Loading...
2003-01-27 EC Agenda PacketAGENDA GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Regular Meeting Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room Monday, January 27, 2003 7:00 P.M. I. Call to Order II. Approval of Minutes — October 28, 2002 III. 2003 Meeting Schedule IV. Program/Project Updates - Natural Resources Inventory ➢ NPDES Phase II ➢ BCWMC Second Generation Plan Boone Avenue & Trunk Highway 55 Project Proposed Developments V. Review Pavement Management Program and Storm Water CIPs — Outline of CIP Process VI. Breakdown of Recycling and Storm Water Revenue Sources VII. Report from Richard Baker on Discussion with City of Plymouth's Environmental Commission Chairperson VIII. Suggestions to Commission by Council Member LeSuer — Regular Rotating Attendance at Council Meetings Regular Report to Council IX. Other Business X. Adjourn G:\Environmental Commission\Agendas\012701doc GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Regular Meeting Minutes January 27, 2003 Present: Richard Baker, Dawn Hill, Alan Kuentz, Sara Peterson City Staff: Al Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator; Jeff Oliver, City Engineer; Tracy Pharr, Administrative Assistant Absent: Sue Hess Call to Order Kuentz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. Approval of Minutes — October 28, 2002 No changes. MOVED by Hill, seconded by Peterson, and the motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the October 28, 2002 meeting as submitted. III. 2003 Meetina Schedule The 2003 meeting schedule was reviewed. Hill asked if any of the dates conflicted with Jewish holidays. Pharr did not think so, but would review the Jewish calendar. Kuentz suggested changing the November and December dates to one week earlier, due to possible scheduling conflicts surrounding the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. MOVED by Hill, seconded by Peterson, and the motion carried unanimously to change dates for November and December meetings to the third Monday of the month. IV. Program/Project Updates: Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) — SEH presented a sneak peek of what the data format will look like. This information will be provided to the Environmental Commission in either February or March. Portions of the NRI may be available on the Web when complete. ' NPDES Phase 11 — Cities (with population larger than 10,000) scrambling to finish their permits by the March 10 deadline. This is an EPA mandated program, enforced by MPCA. Baker arrived at 7:20 pm. GAEnvi ron mental Commission\Minutes\ECMinutes012703.doc BCWMC Second Generation Plan — Flood damage reduction project tentatively approved with approximately 70% funding by the Commission. Kuentz noted the attached Executive Summary (included in Commission packets). He commented that funding options were discussed at the Council meeting. Kuentz stated that Council Member LeSuer brought up whether these CIP projects were worth doing. He suggested this as an area for the Environmental Commission to get involved. Oliver noted that the CIP includes all potential projects watershed -wide. He continued that each project had to be evaluated for feasibility. Baker commented that the cost -benefit of the feasibility study and specifics of the projects would be things for the Commission to submit comments on. Oliver stated that this was part of the purpose of the Program/Project Updates on the Commission's agenda. Kuentz requested information on the Wirth Lake management plan. Lundstrom to provide this. He asked about the WTH 1, 2 and 3 projects. Oliver responded that the Minneapolis Park Board is undertaking these projects, and Golden Valley will be participating. Kuentz asked what the City's contribution is. Lundstrom responded that the City's share is $5,000. Baker concluded that he would like the Environmental Commission to review the five Golden Valley projects listed on the BCWMC's CIP. Kuentz asked staff on the best way to accomplish this. Oliver answered that staff would pull the project information together, and will add the projects to future agendas when at the comment phase. Baker asked for this information as far in advance as possible. Boone Avenue & Trunk Highway 55 Project — City considering major changes in storm water management in this area, primarily relating to flood storage. Meeting scheduled for discussion of the project with the City's consultant, WSB & Associates. Proposed Developments — Central Bank project, at Lewis Road/101h Avenue intersection, was approved. V. Review Pavement Manaaement Proaram and Storm Water CIPs Lundstrom noted that the Pavement Management Program (PMP) CIP will be available on the City's website soon. The City Council approved the 2003-04 PMP. Lundstrom and Kuentz stated the issues of note discussed at the Council meeting. These included the change from concrete to bituminous streets; project cost; the pond at Harold and Winnetka Avenues; vegetative buffer strips and impacts to small wildlife from construction of medians on Winnetka Avenue. The potential impacts to wildlife in this area will be monitored in the future. Lundstrom reviewed the Storm Water CIP. A proposal has been requested to evaluate the Bassett Creek Park Pond Project (noted on the CIP) for erosion control. To date, the creek has been dredged annually by the City's maintenance staff. Lundstrom to bring copies of the draft proposal from the City's consultant to the next meeting. G:\Environmental Commission\Minutes\ECMinutes012703.doc VI. Breakdown of Recycling and Storm Water Revenue Sources Handouts were provided in Commission Members' agenda packets detailing revenue breakdown. Lundstrom briefly reviewed the handouts. VII. Report from Richard Baker on Discussion with City of Plymouth's Environmental Commission Chairperson Baker called the Chairperson from the City of Plymouth's Environmental Commission to discuss their Commission's involvement with the City Council. Following are the highlights arising from that discussion: ➢ In Plymouth, a City Council representative attends almost every Environmental Commission meeting as a non-voting member. ➢ Council Members are assigned as a liaison to every City Commission. ➢ Commission Members only attend City Council meetings when specific issues need to be addressed. ➢ Plymouth's Commission has a voting student member, elected through the high school's science program. ➢ The high school's environmental group is affiliated with Plymouth's Environmental Commission, and works on elementary school education. ➢ Issues that the Commission has worked on in the past include: organics, composting, reducing solid waste, light pollution, erosion control and phosphorus -free fertilizer. ➢ Every few months, proposals are submitted to the City Council requesting guidance. ➢ Commission Members develop an annual work plan. ➢ Subcommittees are assigned to report on specific issues, gather information and form focus groups. ➢ The Environmental Commission mans a booth at City events. VIII. Suggestions to Commission by Council Member LeSuer — Regular Rotating Attendance at Council Meetings, Regular Report to Council The agenda topic was briefly discussed. Baker recommended rotating attendance by Environmental Commission Members at City Council meetings. Baker requested a copy of the 2003 City Council meeting schedule. Pharr will provide this information in the next agenda packet. Further discussion is planned for the February meeting. IX. Other Business Items of Other Business: ➢ Baker asked the status of filling the Commission's two vacancies. Pharr to check with Judy Nally on this. GAEnvironmental Commission\Minutes\ECMinutes012703.doc 3 Kuentz asked why City Council meeting minutes are no longer available on the City's website. Pharr to inquire as to why they are not. Lundstrom noted that staff would be updating two items of current City Code. These include exemption of native grasses from the tall grass/weed ordinance, and restructuring and clarification of illegal grass/yard refuse dumping in Bassett Creek. Lundstrom to provide draft copies of these updates to the Commission at a future meeting. Y Hill questioned if the City of Golden Valley and the State of Minnesota standards and requirements pertaining to the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) were more stringent than those at the Federal level. Oliver and Lundstrom noted that this is the case. ➢ February agenda topics — Program/Project Updates, Commission interaction with the City Council. Baker to inquire on a potential guest speaker regarding stream maintenance/restoration topic for a future meeting. No additional business was addressed. IX. Adjourn The next scheduled meeting will be on February 24, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Tracy E. Pharr Administrative Assistant Department of Public Works GAEnvironmental Commission\Minutes\ECMinutes012703.doc 4 `0q Memorandum olden a e Public Works 763-593-8030 / 763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 7, 2003 Agenda Item 4. C. Department Items Consideration of Proposed Draft Capital Improvement Program related to the Second Generation Plan for the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Summary In response to comments received by member cities regarding the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission (BCWMC), the Commission has issued a revised draft plan for consideration by member cities. After the member cities review the draft CIP, the Commission will take public testimony regarding the document as part of the Second Generation Plan adoption process. The attached memorandum from the Chair of the BCWMC outlines the revisions, options for sharing the cost of the capital improvements, and options for financing the improvements. The Chair has requested that the each city's commissioner review the options with their City Council and staff, and submit comments to the Commission by January 31, 2003. Specifically, the Commission has requested that the member cities comment on: 1. Any concerns/issues related to the proposed 10 year CIP. 2. The proposed CIP funding and cost sharing scenarios. 3. Any additional projects that should be added to Table ii (Draft Water Quality Management Projects/Practices Requested for Consideration by Member Cities. 4. Implementing the option of a watershed tax levy, if it is determined that this option is legal. If this levy is determined legal, the Commission desires comment regarding: a. Should the proposed CIP be financed 100% using this levy, if available? b. Should the Commission pursue legislation to allow such a levy to also be used to fund the Commission's administrative activities? c. If it is not currently possible for the County, at the request of the Commission, to levy a watershed -wide tax, should the Commission pursue legislation that would allow the Commission to use such a levy? GAExecutive Summary\Second Gen Revised CIP2.doc Staff wishes to offer the Council the following comments regarding the proposed revised CIP: 1. Staff has no concerns or issues related to the proposed draft 10 year Cl P, but notes that each actual project scope may change once the project is developed beyond a concept level stage. The final plans should be subject to the approval of the Commission. 2. Based on the cost scenarios developed by the Commission, staff recommends that the City Council support the 0% Commission funding option. This would mean that Golden Valley would be responsible for bearing an estimated $504,800 in costs for water quality improvements associated with Wirth Lake, Twin Lake and the main stem of Bassett Creek in the vicinity of Boone Avenue and Brookview Park. To pay for these projects, the City would need to add approximately $1.00 to the City's quarterly stormwater utility rate raising it from $18.00 per quarter to $19.00 per quarter. 3. Staff recommends that no additional projects be added to Table ii. 4. Regarding the options of utilizing an outside levy authority or county taxing authority to pay for water quality improvements, staff defers to Council for discussion regarding this policy question. Please note that for 2003, the City will pay an assessment of $87,390.00 to the Commission for administrative activities and other studies that the Commission undertakes. The City pays for this assessment through funds raised through the storm water utility charge. Attachments Memo to Commissioners, Bassett Creek Water Management Commission dated November 1, 2002 (10 pages) Recommended Action Motion to direct staff to prepared a letter to the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission indicating that: 1. The City has no concerns or issues related to the proposed 10 year Cl P, but notes that each actual project scope may change once the project is developed beyond a concept level stage. Such changes in scope would require approval of the Commission. 2. The City recommends that the projects be implemented by the member community where the project is located and that the Commission provide no funding to the community for implementation. 3. The City has no additional projects to add to Table ii, Draft Water Quality Management Projects/Practices Requested for Consideration by the Member Cities. Furthermore, staff requests that the Council discuss the options of utilizing an outside levy authority or county taxing authority to pay for water quality improvements and Commission administrative activities. Comments regarding this issue should be incorporated into the letter from the City to the Commission. Barr Engineering Company RECD NOV 2 1 2002 4700 West 77th Street • Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: 952-832-2600 • Fax: 952-832-2601 Minneapolis, MN • Hibbing, MN • Duluth, MN • Ann Arbor, MI • Jefferson City, MO Memorandum To: Technical Advisory Committee — Bassett Creek Water Management Commission From: Pat Schutrop, Recorder, BCWMC Subject: Second Generation Plan — Proposed Capital Improvements and Non -Structural Programs Date: November 20, 2002 Project: 23/27-0512002 c: Steering Committee — BCWMC At the Commission's November 19, 2002 meeting, some of the members of the Technical Advisory Committee expressed interest in receiving a copy of the above -referenced Proposed Capital Improvements and Non -Structural Programs packet that was mailed to the commissioners and alternate commissioners on November 1, 2002. Enclosed is the packet. The Commission set January 31, 2003 as the deadline to receive comments. In the enclosed November 1 memo, the commissioners are requested to meet with their respective city to review and comment on the information presented. The Commission would prefer that the member cities' staff discuss the enclosed information with their Commission representative and submit comments collectively to the Commission. All written comments should be e-mailed to me at pschutrop@barr.com or sent to my attention at the above address. If you have any questions, please contact Len Kremer at 952-832-2781. ::ODMA\PCDOCS\DOCS\237434\ 1 r-tir Bassett Creek Water Management Commission www.bassettcreekwmo.org • Crystal • Golden Valley • Medicine Lake • Minneapolis • Minnetonka • New Hope • Plymouth • Robbinsdale • St. Louis Park Memorandum To: Commissioners, Bassett Creek Water Management Commission From: John O'Toole, Chair, Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Subject: Second Generation Plan — Proposed Capital Improvements and Non -Structural Programs Date: November 1, 2002 Attached to this memorandum are seven tables (Tables 1, IA, 2, 3, i, ii, and iii) related to the proposed capital improvements and non-structural programs that are likely to be included in the Commission's draft second generation plan. These tables are the result of many discussions and meetings with the Commission, Steering Committee, and member cities. I am requesting each Commissioner to meet with their respective city to review and comment on the following: • Proposed capital improvement program (CIP), which is summarized in Tables 1, 2, and 3. Tables 2 and 3 will require ongoing Commission action (along with the capital improvements projects). • CIP funding options — three cost sharing scenarios are depicted in Table IA. • Additional projects that should be added to Table ii. • Watershed tax levy options. Minnesota Statute Chapter 103B authorizes the Commission to request the County to levy ad valorem taxes throughout the watershed for capital projects listed in an approved plan. There is some question as to whether this authority is legally effective. The Commission staff is looking into whether this funding mechanism is, in fact, available. There are a few items for the member cities to consider: If it is currently possible for the County, at the request of the Commission, to levy a watershed -wide tax to pay for projects, then the following questions need to be answered: • Should the proposed CIP be financed 100% using this levy (Yes or No)? n O'Toole, BCWMC Chairman Llo Barr Engineering Company 4700 West 77`x' Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 763-764-2422 Should the Commission pursue legislation to allow such a levy to also be used to fund the Commission's administrative activities (Yes or No)? Charlie LeFevere, Attorney Kennedy & Graven 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-337-9215 612-337-9310 (fax) Leonard Kremer, Engineer Barr Engineering Company 4700 West 77`" Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952-832-2600 952-832-2601 (fax) oop•oznpuEjoUaoW Dg ZOOZ I iagtuanoN\tWid\lgo\LZ\£Z\:d 2IWDI fuinraoaz aV'I gaztAk Jo poogT10" agl pula solnpagos �soilio aq1 slooUar I algla,L •sluauiano.iduq oql ur poiopio pun Buulaaq oilgnd n ploq uoissrmmoD atp miju ,(Iuo ua 1wopun Qq pinom loofoid polsil gong •sjna,C 01 Ixau Oql jo; ,,SluauranoidmT Inlidlao„ Inirilomus posodoid agl jo fuilsil n sr olgnl sigl L algel lun000v uolionnsuoo loafoid IoiiuoD poot3 Dyi_�ADg aqI urojj spun3 luodsu fl 2uis fl sojnlTpuodxg posodozd jo ,CinuuunS — TTT olgla,L SOIJID jagmoW aqI ,Cq uoiiuiopisuoD .roj polsanba-I sooponid/sloafoid luaivafnuuW fQquno ialnAA,— TT olgn,L • suinB id ioiluoD pooid Pun ,Clglano jovA& Innuuy — T olgla L sloafbid Iuauianoiduq InliduD f4ilnna jalnm oinln3 InTlumod — £ olqu l sooilonjd luauragnmW Isag ,(lillano jallaA& IninlanllS-uoX MAOI — Z algn.L • UlUJfOid sluauranoiduq luliduD JUa,T,-OT io.iluOD poold Pun luauraflauuW ,4gnno .zallam ljnijg aqI .ioj suoildp 2uipun3 — di aign.L • urni2o.id sluauianoidull IlalidtD juo T, -OI iorluoD poold Pun luaurafnurW ,Clrinno IQltAA, lJPJG — I olgla,L • :fuimolloj aql olur polqurasslaai puE poluindos atom sloofoid oq,L •sailuoud pun slnof uoissrmmoD pun ,Clio loam of sloofoid pafumilaar aalljurruoo a p `.2uilaaur Ilagl Id •21ilaaui ZOOZ `LZ IsnfnV SIT lla olgnl dIo pasin01 aqI possnosip oalliuzuioD fuuaalS aql 'alglal (]ID aql of pappn azam salon ,Cjolnunldxg •papaau Ion aila anarlaq sailio oql Ilag1 sloafoid pun &D s,,(Iio aql ui Ion we lEgl sloofoid `dID s,,Cllo aql ui am Ingl sloofoid `pololduioo uaaq Xpua qv annq Ingl sloofold Suipnloui `sailio nquraui aqI uioij Nolagpaaj aql 1oollar 01 pasrnai slam <,OlgM dID„ agl s2uilootu ag1 jo llnsoi n sy Ijussooau slam funoora u Iaaj Ion pip n)IuolauuiN pun aNnZ auioipay�I `srlodnauuiW jo sailio aqI 'olupsuiggo d pun `)Ijud sinoZ IS `Ila1s,CiD `glnour,Cld `adog mall `,CaIIuA uaploD Jo sailio 9111 glim laur a0auT2ua uoissiurazoD oq,L •umogs aq pinoo suuld luauzanoiduu XIIIL,nb jolum s,uoissriuruoD 2g1 ui poTjlluopT loofo.id luauranoiduu faQAa Imp os owuzg aural llaa,C-0E P hogs pajanoo 1ng1 alglal o2jul ouo uz umogs aiam sluauranoiduiT Ilaliduo aq1 `aun11ng11d •uuld sluaulanoidurT Ilalidno sailio .iaqu om agI glim 1! ainduroo pula unld sluauranoiduii Inliduo ,tlilunb .ialtm i juip s,uoissTunuoD aqI ssnosip o1 soplo nquiaui g1Tm para of nouTfua SIT p010011p uorssTuiruoD 0141 `21ilaaui ZOOZ `S I XInf SIT Id punoa6)Ioe8 �,Cnal n Bons ass 01 uoissTruuiO3 9141 molls pinom Ing1 uopulsifol onsind uoissT=o:) aqI pinogs `xul opim-pagsiallam n ,(nal of `uoissiunuoD agl;o lsonbaz aqI Ila XlunoD oip jot olgissod illuairno JOUST IIJI •Z Z :aced ZOOZ `I jaqujanoN :aau(l SUM201d IE=3njjS-u0N pus sjuaujanojdmj juatdtD pasodojd — ui!jd uoAej=jD pumas :loafgnS uotssnjnuoD auaumauuLw jalum:jaaj:) Jjasseg `jiegD 'ajoo•j„o ugof :moj3 uoissn=OD luauia2euejN jalrM >jaaiD uasseg 'sjauoissrwwoD :01 To: Commissioners, Bassett Creek Water Management Commission From: John O'Toole, Chair, Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Subject: Second Generation Plan — Proposed Capital Improvements and Non -Structural Programs Date: November 1, 2002 Page: 3 funding; this results in the large CIP expenditure shown in 2003. The projects over the remaining years of the CEP were programmed to evenly distribute the annual project expenditures. Table 1 A Table IA shows three tables depicting the payments by the member cities under three different funding options: • 100% Commission funding option — this table shows the payments by the member cities if the Commission funds 100% of the water quality project costs. • 0% Commission funding option — this table shows the estimated costs for the member cities if the Commission funds 0% of the water quality project costs. For this "city funding" scenario, it was assumed that the city in which the proposed project is located would bear all of the project costs. • 20% Commission funding option — this table shows the effect on the member cities if the Commission funds 20% of the water quality project costs and the cities fund the remaining 80% of the water quality project costs. This "blended" option is included, based on feedback from the member cities and some of the Commission members. "Commission funding" means the Commission would allocate project costs using the same funding formula as the Commission uses for its general administrative levy. This levy is allocated among the member cities on the basis of a formula that is set in the joint powers agreement. The formula is based 50% on the net tax capacity of the property within the watershed and 50% on the land area within the watershed of each city. Each city's total and annual share of the Commission -assessed costs are shown. The city costs were determined according to the rate at which the Commission assessed the cities in the 2003 budget. The 20% Commission funding option would require a 2/3 vote by the Commission, since it would be a modification of the "50/50" as stated above and defined in the joint powers agreement. The city project responsibilities for the "city funding" options are summarized in the following table: P:\23\27\051\p1an\November 12002 BC Memorandum.doc aop•LunpuEioruaW Dg ZOOZ T iagtuan0N\uEid\TS0\LZ\£Z\:d -sloofoid luauianoidun aaglo put, sootlouid luama2uut,m isoq ,Uilunb ialt,m Allsoo -ssal aql Jo ssauantloajja aql olt,nluna of passt,d st,q amid aumoigns iagu ,Cluo sloafoad luammuail mnit, glim pt,aqu anom pinom uotssrmmOD oqj •olqul s'tP ul popnlout cit, put, sloafojd aznlnj lutlualod pataplsuoo ant, `oV-j ganAk joj ldooxo `sloofold luoupuoil mnit, aql jo 11L,`sat�to tagmam aql moth paniaoai uotssmzmo� aql 31ougpaaj oql uo posug •sotpoq ralt,m aql ioj slt,of ,ilzlunb ralum s,uotssu=OD aq; iaaui of suuld luama2uuum oV, put, pogs.talt,m s,uoisstmmoD agl Xq papuounuooai wom sloofotd agl30 llV ,•sloo[OJd oirun3„ pa.taplsuoo aiu put, alqul dlD 02.tul aql moaj panom Wom sloofoid asogl •ut,ld uopuzauai? pu000s aql jo uotldopt, i?utmolloJ siva,C OT a p ut uotlmuamaldua.ioj,ipt,at oq of XIoTI lou am lt,gl sloofoid aql sisq olgt,l siq,l, E algL •sdlg asagl jo ,Cue toy futpung opnlouilou scop la2pnq £OOZ s,uotssnumoD aqj •lafpnq rulnfaz s,uotssu=oD oql jo Ino popunj oq pinogs Xotp jt oumuolap of [Cllunuuu sloofoid osogl matnat llim uotssTurmo:) oql « tapto„ uotsstuitu0 u omnbat i,uop , oql gouts `ss000id 2uTio2pnq lt,nuut, julnfoj s,uoisstmmoD aql jo urd su poluamaldmt oq pinoo sdwq osogl •sluamanozdun lt,lidt,o azul lou puu luimonns-uou cit, Aogj osnt,00q alqul stgl of panom atam puu olqul HD (afrel) lt,ut2uo agp ut aiam (sdlNg) soopowd luomapt,ut,m lsoq asagZ -pound JEOX-OI amt,s aql zano saotloutd luama2uuma lsoq c4llt,nb ialt,m lt,tttjotuls-uou aqi slstl algt,l s1q L Z algel. •2uuuoq otlgnd aql 2utmolloj poUlpom aq llps pinoo ouuuaos 2utpung oql •uousaapisuoa io3 auo ,eau E dojanap io Isotauuam 2utpunj asaq; jo auo asooqa of paau (uoissiuiuio3 aq; Xlaluur!lln'puu) satlta aaquiaui aql (L-1SM) loafoad aiIu-j poomisOM agl Claud slnol •1S loafoad puod sawlj!D agl alupsulggoU (6 --IN IR Z -IN) sloafoad aMul poomglJON aql to oml (9--,W `S-lW ti-lW `6-lW `l-lW) sloafoad eNul aulolpaW aql to Ild glnowAid 4 -WR L -IN) sloafoad aNul POOH ON aql to Oma adoH maN (Z -l0 T8 L-13) sloafad aiIul auujo aql to liv LMuolauulW auoN slloduauulW auoN e� e -j aulolpaW (L-09) loafoad walS u!uW Naaa0 Massae agl (L -Ml) loafoad 9�ul ulml agl (6_ M V Z-lM `L-lM) sloafoad aMe-1 glalM aql to Iib' Aallun uapioE) auoN Iulsko salllffglsuodsaa loafoad �l� aagwaW q :aaud ZOOZ `t iagwanoH :31uQ S=-IfOid F=3npS-130H puu sl—oAoiduq p!&D posodoid - -Id uoquianao puoaaS :;aafgnS uotssnnwo:) luawa8uatN ialum xaa D Uassug `I!EqD `atoo•t„p ugof :wo.IA uotssTw 0D juawaSunuW iaaum xaaiD wSsug `siau0Tssnuw0D :os To: Commissioners, Bassett Creek Water Management Commission From: John O'Toole, Chair, Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Subject: Second Generation Plan — Proposed Capital Improvements and Non -Structural Programs Date: November 1, 2002 Pace: 5 Table i This table lists the annual water quality and flood control programs over the same 10 -year period. All of the programs in this table are included in the Commission's 2003 budget ($92,000). These programs are being implemented as part of the Commission's regular annual budgeting process, since they don't require a Commission "order." Included in the table are new initiatives, such as erosion control and sediment removal along the Main Stem, inspection and short-term maintenance of the flood control project, and long-term maintenance of the flood control project. Table ii This table lists the water quality management projects and best management practices that were requested by the member cities to be included in the Commission's work program. At this time, the table includes only the projects requested by the city of Plymouth. The project information was obtained from the City of Plymouth's Medicine Lake Watershed Implementation and Management Plan and the Parkers Lake Implementation Plan, and from discussions with city staff regarding the year of project implementation. The other member cities need to provide the information on the additional water quality improvement projects that should be added to this table, especially if they are already in the city's capital improvements or implementation program. Additional items may be added to this table as a result of public processes. There are many items listed in the table that have not been funded by the Commission in the past and have historically been the responsibility of the member cities, such as additional/more frequent street sweeping and catch basin cleaning. These projects need to be reviewed by the Commission to determine their water quality benefits. Based on the results of the review, the Commission may fund all, a portion, or none of the projects. The Commission's current 2003 budget does not include funding for these projects. Table Hi This table is a summary of the Commission's proposed use of unspent funds from the flood control project construction account to fund three flood control related projects/programs. This table is for informational purposes only, as it contains projects/programs that are already included in Tables 1, IA, and i. PA23\27\05 Aplan\November 12002 BC Memorandum.doc Table 1 Bassett Creek Water Management Commission DRAFT Water Quality Management and Flood Control 10 -Year Capital Improvements Program November 1, 2002 I Year Ma ID # Water QualityImprovement Option Capital Cost z NOTES: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Medicine Lake ML -1 ° CONSTRUCT WET DETENTION POND FOR SUBWATERSHED BC94B1 (Alt. 48) $0 _. $0 Other potential projects that the cities may implement will be evaluated at the time the projects become more definite. CONSTRUCT WET DETENTION POND AT BC -P40 LOCATION, REROUTE ML -3" FLOWS FROM SUBWATERSHED BC94 TO A LARGER WET DETENTION POND $90,200 Z FOR BC92 (Alt. 9a) & DREDGING OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT -Capital Cost does not include land acquisition costs, but does include legal, administration, and 25% $13.900 $104,100 additional for contingencies. ° ML MEDICINE LAKE EAST BEACH WET DETENTION POND FOR SUBWATERSHED $347,950 a -4 gC107 (Alt. #11) &DREDGING OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT -Already constructed a This project includes dredging of accumulated sediment, as recommended by the City of Plymouth $401,850 $53,900 5 CONSTRUCT WET DETENTION PONDS FOR SUBWATERSHEDS BC98, BC98A$272,540 ML -5' AND BC986 (Alt. 10a) & DREDGING OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT in the Medicine Lake Watershed Implementation and Management Plan. The dredging cost is the $42,200 $314,740 cost shown below the line. ML -6 CONSTRUCT WET DETENTION POND FOR SUBWATERSHED BC94B2 (Alt. #6) $10,800 6 Parkers Lake - $10,800 - MnDO T sound wall construction in New Hope will require relocation & resizing of storm sewer in None -see Potential Future CIP Table and Protects/Practices Requested for Consideration Table this watershed, which could lead to City of New Hope participation in this project. 6 - The Commission will consider including repair of the existing control structure as part of the Wirth Lake WTH-1 6.7 DREDGING SUBWATERSHED, FR -5 DETENTION POND (Alt. #2) $40,000 $40,0001 feasibility study for this project. Project is in City of Golden Valley's CIP. ' WTH-2' HIGHWAY 55 DETENTION POND (Alt. #3) $151,200 $75.600 $75,600 - Project costs may be offset by $150,000 LCMR grant. / 6 WTH-3 IN -LAKE ALUM TREATMENT (Alt #1) $45 ,2 0 $45,600 9 Project is in City of Golden Valley's CIP. SweenO Lake> Project is not included in the City of Golden Valley's CIP. 10 _The Ci of St. Louis Park supports City a scaled-down, less costly project that includes park and playground improvements. The city staff agrees with the Commission's proposed schedule, but None -see Potential Future CIP Table Twin Lake. 9 TW -1 Pond Expansion (AI;. #1) suggests re-evaluation of the Commission's water quality goal for Westwood Lake. `.' _ � ,; Westwood Lake $52 700 $52,700 - The City of New Hope has constructed NB -35A, B, C, but not to the same degree as proposed in the lake and watershed management plan. NB -29A & B have not been constructed. These WST-1 1° FLAG AVENUE DETENTION/SKIMMING FACILITY (Alt. #1) Bassett Creek Park Pond $463 800 $231.900 $231900 , improvements will need to be re-evaluated as part of the feasibility study. Costs shown are for NB- ;. None -see Potential Future CIP Table _ - 29A & B only. �rthwood Lake $0 - The City of New Hope has already constructed NB- 28A & B. The city will be constructing ponds NB-37A & NB -38A in the next year. Pond NB -36A may be constructed in conjunction with a church 11 .L-1 CONSTRUCT PONDS NB-35A,B,C AND NB-29A,B (Alt. #3) NL -2 DREDGE POND NB-07(Alt. #1) $74,300 $74,300 expansion project. These improvements will need to be re-evaluated as part of the feasibility DIVERT LANCASTER LANE STORM SEWER (Alt. #2) NL -L-4 $725,700 a$241,900 $241,900 $241,900 study. Costs shown are for NB -36A, NB -37A & NB -38A only. 1 NL -4 12 CONSTRUCT PONDS NB -36A, NB -37A, NB 38A, AND NB-28A,B (Alt. #4) $45,200 $45,200 "- This project to be completed as part of the Boone Avenue and Brookview Golf Course improvement Bassett Creek Main Stem $141,100 $141,100 projects in 2004. BC -1 " POND BC -10-3 (Att. #4) 14 This project should be feasible as part of the City of Robbinsdale's street reconstruction project Grimes; North,& South Rice Ponds $215,300 $215 300 taking place in the near future. 15 GR -21 4 GRIMES POND WET DETENTION POND #4) -Funding is from remaining flood control project construction funds ($700,000). The floodproofing (Alt. S80,000 $80,000 funds are proposed to be allocated as follows: 2003 - $100,000, 2004 - $200,000, 2005 - $300,000 and Crane Lake :. _ _ 2006 - $100,000. These amounts are the Commission costs, at the 65% level of funding. See CL -1 I RAMADA INN DETENTION,'SKIMMING FACILITY (Alt. #1) CL -2 lJoy Lane Wet Detention Pond (Alt. #2) $89,100 $85.100 $89,100 Table iii. Turtle Lake $85,100 None - see Potential Future CIP Table Lost Lake None - see Potential Future CIP Table Year Map ID # Flood Control Improvement Option Capital Cost Z 2003 20041 20051 20061 20071 20081 20091 2010 20111 2012 - lFlood proofing of homes along trunk system t5 $700,000 Sol $0 $0l $0l TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $3,740;5901 $877,790 1 $216,7001 $215,3001 $184,1001 $242,700 $231;900 $241,9001 $294,6001 $241,9001 $293,700 Revised CIP 11-01-02.XLS Table 1. 1-10 yr CIP 11/1/02 Crystal Golden Valley Medicine Lake Minneapolis Minnetonka New Hope Plymouth Robbinsdale St. Louis Park Crystal Golden Valley Medicine Lake Minneapolis Minnetonka New Hope Plymouth Robbinsdale St. Louis Park Crystal Golden Valley Med:, Lake Minneapolis Minnetonka New Hope Plymouth Robbinsdale St. Louis Park Ta. A Bassett Creek Water Management Commission DRAFT Water Quality Management and Flood Control 10 -Year Capital Improvements Program Funding Options November 1, 2002 100% Commission Funding Ontinn City Share of BCWMC Assessed Costs Per Year Total $157,807 2003 $45,557 2004 $11,247 2005F $11,174 2006 $9,555 2007 $12,596 2008 $12,036 2009 $12,555 2010 2011 2012 $742,208 $214,269 $52,896 $52,555 $44,939 $59,243 $56,607 $59,048 $15,290 $71,912 $12,555 $59,048 $15,243 $71,692 $19,764 $188,213 $5,706 $54,335 $1,409 $13,414 $1,399 $13,327 $1,197 $11,396 $1,578 $1,507 $1,572 $1,915 $1,572 $1,909 $157,807 $45,557 $11,247 $11,174 $9,555 $15,023 $12,596 $14,355 $12,036 $14,974 $12,555 $18,236 $15,290 $14,974 $12,555 $18,180 $168,145 $1,433,030 $48,542 $11,984 $11,906 $10,181 $13,421 $12,824 $13,377 $16,291 $13,377 $15,243 $16,242 $46,217 $413,702 $13,342 $102,131 $101,471 $86,766 $114 ,385 $109,294 $114,007 $138,845 $114,007 $138,421 $127,401 $0 $3,294 $9,080 $3,273 $9,021 $2,798 $7 714 $3,689 $10,169 $3,525 $3,677 $4,478 $3,677 $4,464 �$$s$010p0'I [T$36.779 1g $0 a 2ISQ© X104 J 0 $231,900 i $9,717 $10,136 $12,344 $10,136 2 ;909. $12,306 X93 700 $735 $63,844 $89 3 $869 $1,804 $1,543 $187,554 i"a94f1 $2,027 $2,469 .: < 0% Commission Funding Ontinn City Project Costs Per Year Total $0 2003 2004 2005 2006F 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 $504,800 $0 $161,200 $0 $0 $75,600 $215,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280 $239 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $174,200 $ 215,400 $0 $0 $0 $141,100 $0 $O $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $174,200 $1,602,390 $80,000 $716,590 $0 $0 $0 $104,100 $0 $10,800 $0 $0 $0 $241,900 $0 $241,900 $0 $241,900 $74,300 $45,200 $463,800 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,688 �$$s$010p0'I $2,668 $7,356 1g $0 a 231900 $117 $231,900 i $0 $0 $0 $p $735 $63,844 $89 3 $869 $1,804 $1,543 $187,554 i"a94f1 $2,027 $2,469 $2,027 $ 20% Commission Funding Ontinn City Share of Projects Costs Per Year -----2-0-05-[-F0-06 Total $31,561 2003 $9,111 2004 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 $552,282 $171,814 $2,249 $71,059 $2,235 $182,751 $1,911 $8,988 $2,519 $11,849 $2,407 $11,321 $2,511$3,058 $2,511 $3,049 $3,6 3 $1,141 $282 $280 $239 $316 $301 $11,810 $314 $56,542 $383 $11,810 $14,338 $37,643 $170,921 $10,867 $2,683 $2,665 $2,279 $3,005 $2,871 $2,995 $3,647 $314 $2,995 $382 $3,636 $205,949 $9,111 $9,708 $2,249 $115,277 $2,235 $2,381 $1,911 $2,036 $2,519 $2,407 $2,511 $3,058 $2,511 $142,409 $1,568,518 $656,012 $20,426 $20,294 $100,633 $2,684 $31,517 $2,565 $21,859 $2,675 $216,321 $3,258 $221,289 $2,675 $216,321 $62,688 $73,243 $396,520 $2,668 $7,356 $659 $1,816 $655 $64,560 $738 $705 $735 $896 $735 $63,844 $89 3 $869 $1,804 $1,543 $187,554 $187,463 $2,027 $2,469 $2,027 $ $2?} G00 . 6?t;9©(i 293 709 - Cost includes the city's share of the project costs, according to the assessment rates used for the 2003 budget Revised CIP 11-01-02.XLS Table 1A Funding Options Table 2 Bassett Creek Water Management Commission DRAFT 10 -Year Non -Structural Water Quality Best Management Practices November 1, 2002 Notes: ' The City of Golden Valley has completed inventory for most of the Main Stem. The City of Plymouth is to complete the inventory for Plymouth Creek. Costs shown are for completing the inventory of the North Branch. TBD = To be determined Revised CIP 11-01-02.XLS Table 2. Non -Structural BMPs 11/1 InI Tante 3 Bassett Creek Water Management Commission DRAFT Potential Future Water Quality Capital Improvement Projects November 1, 2002 Map ID # Improvement Option' NOTES: MIOC 1P RI �� � �" " " `. _ :� ' - Other potential projects that the cities may implement will be evaluated at the time the projects become more definite. ML -8 2 CONSTRUCT PLYMOUTH CREEK STORMWATER ALUM" TREATMENT PLANT (20 CFS) (Alt. #14) ML -9 2 IN -LAKE ALUM TREATMENT (Alt. #16) t - Alum treatment projects will be considered "future projects" - the Commission will move ahead with alum treatment only after sufficient time has passed to evaluate the 2 ANNUAL O&M COST FOR ALUM TREATMENT PLANT effectiveness of less costly BMPs. PL -1 3 21 ST AVENUE DIVERSION (Alt. #3) - Since completion of the lake and watershed management plan, Parkers Lake water quality PL 3 ALUM TREATMENT PLANT -2 (Alt. #4) has Improved and is now meeting the Commission's water quality goals. As long as the lake's water quality continues to meet the Commission's goals, these projects will be considered "future projects." PL -3 3 ROUTE SOUTH NIAGARA WATERSHED TO SOUTH POND (Alt. #1) PL -4 3 PARKERS NORTH DETENTION/SKIMMING FACILITY (Alt. #6) 3 ANNUAL O&M COST FOR ALUM TREATMENT PLANT ' -Need to re-evaluate waterualit q y goal for Bassett Creek Park Pond prior to project implementation. The City of Golden Valley is not likely to support this project. SL -1 DETENTION POND ADJACENT TO DNR WETLAND (Alt. #4) 5 - Project Is not included In the City of Golden Valley's CIP SL -2 ALUM TREATMENT PLANT (Alt. #3) 6 - In -lake alum treatment of North & South Rice Ponds may have already been completed ANNUAL O&M COST FOR ALUM TREATMENT PLANT by local residents. W9Of fCreekPaF., . v '! , � �., .al. BCP -1 ° Flow Diversion Alum Treatment Facility Alt. #9 ANNUAL O&M COST FOR ALUM TREATMENT PLANT Noift�Wotic[ Lake%..:" M-, NL -5 DREDGE PONDS NB -19, NB -21, AND NB -24 (Alt. #5) NL -6 CONSTRUCTION OF ALUM TREATMENT PLANT AT NB -07 (Alt. #6) ANNUAL O&M COST FOR ALUM TREATMENT PLANT Ba s DAWN .;� BC -2 BC -2 5 POND HH1111-1 (Alt. #2) BC -3 5 POND BC -111152 (Alt. #8) BC -4 5 RETROFIT POND HH -11 Alt. #1 BC -5 5 POND BC -11112-12 Alt. #7 BC -6 5 POND BC -91-5 (Alt. #5) BC -7 5 POND BC -72-2 (Alt. #6) BC -8 5 POND HH11-0 (Alt. #3) Noft h $360,'tff,%c9�F,�Arl� GR -3 a In -Lake Alum Treatment of North and South Rice Ponds (Alt. #3) TU -1 Dredge North Wetland (Alt. #4) TU -2 Extensive Dredaina of Turtle Lake Alt. #6 LL -1 I IN -LAKE ALUM TREATMENT (Alt. #1 Revised CIP 11-01-02ALS Table 3. Potential Future CIP 11/1/02 Table i Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Annual Water Quality and Flood Control Programs t November 1, 2002 Ma ID # Improvement Option Water Quality<> Level of Commission Funding2003 2004 2005 2006 Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Education program0 100% $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Water quality improvement demonstration projects 10090 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Water qualitv monitoring of major water bodies 10090 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000$20,000 $20,000 Construction erosion control inspection program 10090 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 Commission review of improvement projects and development proposals for compliance with Commission requirements 10090 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 Public relations (operation of WOMP station on Bassett Creek, CAMP, River Watch Program, Annual Report, andpublications) 10090 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Erosion control and sediment removal along Main Stem Flood Control s 10090 $50,000 $50 00 0 $50 000 $50 000 $50 000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 .: r,c " ., Inspection and short term maintenance of flood control project 10090 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Long term maintenance of flood control project' 10090 $25,000 $25,000$25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Lake and stream gauging erogram water level readings) 10090 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 Commission review of improvement projects and development proposals for compliance with Commission requirements ° 100% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST ,-. ; , .. , ;, $62,000 ,. $9T 017 $97;000 � $97,000,.$$7,000$97,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Notes: 1 All of the items in this table are funded under the BCWMC's Administration Budget 2 Cost-sharing provided by the Metropolitan Council for operation of WOMP station. Costs shown include only the BCWMC share of the costs. 3 Funds to be used as needed for long term maintenance of flood control project system. Funding is from remaining flood control project construction funds ($335,000) plus $25,000 annual assessment. The fund balance is to be maintained at (but not exceed) $1 million. ° Cost/funding of this activity is included in the "Water Quality" portion of this table. Revised CIP 11-01-02.XLS Table i. Annual Programs O O C d Gi CD pZ w N 1 i * O c C C 0 7J O (n C O T o O n 0 W �7 D O 3 J Z W D r C N K K 0 T 3 -i D a '1„ 7 3 N w ^Z S y W N '{x O O _. N p 0 Ip o d O N 61 �, n C C d ID n J" N 1 N J O 0 a a 7 N - ' G O a J O 3 tD m r m r W r N CD 2 p a O Al p W n n _. J N N d o 3 N 7 m J Q n J j .". N n n _. g En Irr y m o p a n a m m a d O a oo O r. N J m m m j d m m o m o 3 co m r r m o? J m 3 w w o m o u m m Q 0 0 n 0 C O n N C Ul O fD J D N O N IV N pt N Cn J 3 M 0 3 O< In N = O O C O J 'J 'JJJJ .J J a 3. o m o m O ND a z m no v m m r � z m _ d m d J g `^ v 3 0 fA bi fA fA ER fA f9 d3 bi FA � OO � � Hi N fA O 69 N EA N ER p � m j N p om- A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (WJt O O O O N O O O O N O O N O O O N O = � n Q _; N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 O 0 p 0o p No 0 0 O 0 O 0 3 0 N 0 to _. o 0 0 � 0 w O t O N N N tD O 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 V N N N N p N 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 O 0 0 O O 0 00 O pA O � V � O fN N b9 N UNi EA fA O (Nig �_ N ER di o uNi 6'i uNi fA m � (J O EA N � A N O EA W O O 0 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O O O N p m � N61 A 69 O O 0 O o O O : 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O p� O p p N O 'p O NV 0 O N O N O N V y O � ED O 0 O O 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 N 00 !b N po O O O O O O O cc N O 1a O O A O O I I I i I L I I I I LL I � O O fH V O N O O N O (SII O O N O N N C� G f0 p d Dr v W CD (D fD 0 CD U ;K- oz w d (D ry (D M 1 Q 0 M N d 7 a CD N N .0 CD Q r 3 C) D N N T a 0 0 3 O N J N (A O CL CD d O 7 Q CDS Table iii. Summary of Proposed Expenditures Using Unspent Funds from the BCWMC Flood Control Project Construction Account Funding Item Floodproofing of homes along trunk system Total Allocation from Flood Control Project $700,000 Annual Allocations Annual Assessments 2003-2013 $0 2003 2004 2005 2006 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $100,000 As needed As needed Flood Control Emergency Repair Project $500,000 $0 Flood Control Project Long Term Maintenance $335,000 $25,000 TOTAL $1,535,000 Flood proofing of homes along trunk system The BCWMC will provide funding assistance for homes that were proposed to be floodproofed as part of the original flood control project and those homes along the trunk system that do not have 100 -year flood protection. The allocated amounts are the Commission costs, assuming the Commission funds 65% of the floodproofing costs, not including engineering and design, and the property owners perform the floodproofing work. Flood Control Emergency. Repair Project The BCWMC will establish a reserve fund, to be used as needed for emergency repairs to the flood control project system. Flood Control Proiect Long Term Maintenance The BCWMC will use this fund as needed for long term maintenance of the flood control project system. The fund will be created by using $335,000 from the flood control project construction account, with annual assessments of $25,000 added to the fund. The fund balance is to be maintained at (but not exceed) $1 million. Summary of Excess Revenues A construction account was set up for the flood control project in 1987. Cash contributions to the account totaled over $6.9 million and included contributions from the member cities, MnDOT, MnDNR, Hennepin County, General Mills, and interest earned on investments. After paying for the project and paying back $215,000 owed to the BCWMC Administrative account, there was $1,535,000 remaining in the construction account. The BCWMC decided to use the remaining funds for future work related to the flood control project. P:\23\27\051\plan\Table iii.doc 11/1/02 EXISTING 4 -WAY STOP CONDITION WINNETKA AVENUE SOUTH I -- i .� WINNETKA AV 01. � •,,' I I I I 1 S II II 1 II 11 W I 1 I I I y L— WINNETKA AVENUE SOUTH M-09141 � PROPOSE CONCRETE T ---- ------ rn 1 r 70- 00. 000 L � : 'v /' : i:•I: -•'41r •W+.Mfr � .....•_._ . P"`^, � _ O 1 r _ .s J AVF — ` V - - -- n `U� N PROPO D - - �, • CONCR E I Q• `'� cA"c_ - �. m SIDEWA K I co in vd- N B1 —11 LEGEND Existing Curb & Gutter Proposed Curb & Gutter Existing Sanitary Sewer Proposed Sanitary Sewer Proposed Sanitary Sewer Lining — Existing Watermain — —,— Proposed Watermain Existing Storm Sewer Proposed Storm Sewer Proposed Drain Tile Existing Pavement GRAPHIC SCALE so z5 so too 200 (>Mnas) GRAPHIC SCALE 5025 so 100 200 WINNETKA AVENUE SOUTH FIGURE 32 M I N C' 2�7y Rl'� tl .m r m N WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH TRAIL BROOKVIEW PARK WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH 205 D R o BROOKVIEW PARK O ` 'tz e t [I m F �I C �Im PROPOSED POND L PROPOSED POND I' A LEGEND Existing Curb & Gutter Proposed Curb & Gutter — - - Existing Sanitary Sewer Proposed Sanitary Sewer Proposed Sanitary Sewer Lining — Existing Watermain — Proposed Watermain - Existing Storm Sewer Proposed Storm Sewer Proposed Drain Tile I-1 Existing Pavement GRAPHIC SCALE 50 25 50 100 200 ( DF FM GRAPHIC SCALE 50 25 50 100 200 (INS) WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH FIGURE 33 �GWden ��alley _ 5EN "Cit olden �allev Date: October 15, 2002 Public Works 763-593-8030 / 763-593-3988 (fax) To: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Don Taylor, Director of Finance From: Al Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator LQ\ Subject: 2003 - 2007 Capital Improvement Submittals — Storm Sewer Fund Please find enclosed updated and proposed Capital Improvement Projects for the 2003 - 2007 Storm Sewer Fund. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions. G:WI Lundstrom\CIP Memo.doc CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 2002 — 2006 CIP STORM SEWERS INDEX Pr_ oiect 2- -pf"denti"tewn-Sewer- mpr$vement-(2992-2006) Pond & Flood Storage - Boone Ave. & GV Road (2002&2004) Water Quality Ponding c@ Arts High School Bank Stabilization @ Bassett Creek ar. NaImF ewFee4fweRteryr 2003 Pave 1--------144- 2 -—_--__-_1442 145 3 146 4 147 5 --AA8 Stream Bank Stabilization -Bassett Creek (2003-2005) 6 149 Pond Retrofits — Brookview Park 7 150 Pond Bank Stabilization in Brookview Park 8 151 2004 Scheid Park Water Quality Pond 9 152 2006 A92e-, Gearty Park Water Quality PondAir<+a10 153 Buffer Zone - Golden Hills Drive Pond 11 154 Street Sweeper 12 155 143 PR JE T CATEGORY Storm Sewers PROJECT Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT- DESCRIPTION Residential Storm Sewer Improvements (SS #1) EXPENDITURE TIMING $5,000,000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 000L $1,000,000 I $1,000,000 I $1,000,000 I $1,000,000 I $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: Construction and/or repair of residential storm sewer system, which may include water quality ponds, in conjunction with the annual rehabilitation of various City streets, as part of the on-going Pavement Management Program (See S #1). JUSTIFICATION: Improve storm water drainage system in the City at the same time the streets are under construction thereby minimizing the disruption in the area. Improve drainage to maximize life of pavement. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Reduced repair and maintenance expenditures on City's storm sewer system. 144 PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Sewers PROJECT FINANCING: Tax Increment Bonds TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pond & Flood Storage - Boone Ave. & Golden Valley Rd. (SS #2) EXPENDITURE TIMING $225,000 2002 2003 2004 1 2005 2006 000 1 $125,000 DESCRIPTION: Purchase property in N.E. quadrant of Boone Ave. and Golden Valley Rd. in 2002. Construct water quality ponds on property in 2004, after completion of residential and commercial development in Area B of Valley Square Tax Increment District. Also includes the construction of additional flood storage on the BP Amoco site in the S.E. quadrant in 2002. JUSTIFICATION: Provide additional flood control storage and protect the water quality of Bassett Creek. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Assist in the reduction of flood damage in this area of Bassett Creek during periods of heavy rains. 145 ... . ....... 3AV NIS Of o' I o LJ Ljj 5 CD ry 12 Yp LLJ U) Lj z X7) 0 LLJ -h 0 D 00 CD 0 LL- 3KQQ9 aA-lg silih Lj C:8 0 Lli OO W j > < Lli CL Z 8n-Lvo O lz-101019 3AVdnivO30 IV) m 0 N z LLJ :2 LLJ 0 cr- CL :2 tzllTOW � N 0 0 N PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Sewers FINANCING: Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Water Quality Ponding @ Arts High School (SS #3) EXPENDITURE TIMING ----F $120,000 2002 2003 2004 2005 120,000 1 $120,000 DESCRIPTION: Participate in construction of storm water pond to collect runoff crossing Minnesota Arts School property. Project may require the relocation of City water main. State of Minnesota is doing the engineering design work. City to participate based upon relative acreage of contributing drainage areas. JUSTIFICATION: Ponding required for Arts School expansion, but State will not pay for drainage from other properties. Water quality improvements are required to meet Bassett Creek Commission and local requirements. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: None. 146 .A,- PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Sewers PROJECT _FINANCING: Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Bank Stabilization @ Bassett Creek Park (SS #4) EXPENDITURE TIMING $250,000 2002 2003 1 2004 2005 $250,000 $250,000 M DESCRIPTION: Stabilization of creek bank in Bassett Creek Park to allow for better access to stream pond to remove accumulated sediment. Includes the installation of sheet piling, construction of an access road, bank stabilization and erosion control. JUSTIFICATION: Eliminate annual expense of building a temporary access road into pond. Will also improve the water quality of Bassett Creek. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Reduced expenditures for annual construction of temporary access road into pond. 147 Q r CD O Of n EN Q Q U co O I N O O N CATEGORY Storm Sewers PROJECT FINANCING: Storm Sewer Utility Fund State of Minnesota TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Natural Resource Inventory (SS #5) EXPENDITURE TIMING $25,000 2002 2003 2004 2005 20,000 $45,002J$4�fl00 DESCRIPTION: Develop an inventory of the community's natural resources. Evaluate, rank and grade the natural resources. Develop goals and strategies for preservation and management. JUSTIFICATION: Assist in developing capital improvement projects and maintenance programs to assist in managing and preserving the City's natural resources. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: None. 148 PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Sewers FINANCING: Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 9 I,, PROJECT DESCRIPTION Stream Bank Stabilization — Bassett Creek (SS #6) EXPENDITURE TIMING 2002 2003 2004 2005 $200,000 1 $200,000 1 $200,000 180 DESCRIPTION: Stabilization of banks along various sections of Bassett Creek. In 2001, a detailed inventory of the stream bank conditions along the length of Bassett Creek in Golden Valley was completed. JUSTIFICATION: Reduce stream bank erosion and protect the water quality of Bassett Creek. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Reduced expenditures for storm water maintenance along Bassett Creek. 149 PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Sewers P__RGJECT FINANCING: Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRO ECT DESCRIPTION Pond Retrofits — Brookview Park (SS #7) EXPENDITURE TIMING $175,000 2002 2003 1 2004 J 2005 $175,0001 $175,000 M DESCRIPTION: Modify outlet structures and storm sewers in and around the existing ponds in Brookview Park to provide additional water quality storage. This work to be performed in conjunction with Pavement Management Program (See S #1) projects. JUSTIFICATION: Protect the water quality of Bassett Creek. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: None. 150 PROJECT ATEGORY Storm Sewers PROJECT FINANCING: Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pond Bank Stabilization in Brookview Park (SS #8) EXPENDITURE TIMING $250,000 F2002 2003 2004 2005 $250,OOEJ I $250,000 9 DESCRIPTION: Project to stabilize pond banks in Brookview Park that are currently sloughing into ponds. Also includes the construction of buffer strips around ponds for additional water quality and bank stabilization. JUSTIFICATION: Reduction in pond bank erosion, with resulting improvement in water quality and reduced maintenance of badly eroding pond banks. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Reduced expenditures for pond maintenance. 151 7 W CC _J O U n iJLL- -i n O 0 Qw �inn� !sls��lt! Z! I t Kl S •`'1,•drr i! i! `tt'��t¢�, x�f �fi as ! sf ��S! ! � i! si ►e! i �! �! �tf �! Z! si �t! ! ,if �! S! ��E� ! ,:�� ,t! ! sf �! ,t i �! Kf ii �! i •z i 4i i i if i�l't•ir'ii Ki• iii Rf � - t 0 CD O Cy CL Ld a� LLI '= Q J LLJ> —� O Q CC z > CL Oz_� W J O O F- U CL W O CD O >-- O ~ O CL 0 cq PROJECT CATEGORY S-rc aw" Spy amt) PROJECT FINANCING: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION AMrck LA" Wi4rrJ7— Q jAc- N Zev•pmr(rnne?-4r% EXPENDITURE TIMING 2003 2004 2005----[ 2006 TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES DESCRIPTION: &[. grN V Y'S CcN7.2o aLmop,! fheMMa_&Rae-Is, 43C.WMG. � MM i�o�' "� "�re�Pcwvts� -tom—` WkT�is rr WrRrrf L,4KE'' JUSTIFICATION: EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: 80^C 2007 SI]OdV3NNIV4 30 Al X-1 U.) 3AV A80A tn O CL Ld z M U_ 0 I 0 0 F 0 PRO ECT CATEGORY Storm Sewers PROJECT FINANCING: Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Scheid Park Water Quality Pond (SS #9) EXPENDITURE TIMING $110,000 2002 2003 1 2004 1 2005 110,004 I I $110,000 DES(;RIPTION: ��.� Construction of water quality pond in Scheid Park in conjunction with Pavement Management Program (See S #1). JUSTIFICATION: Improve water quality of Bassett Creek. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Increased expenditures for pond maintenance. 152 Q ry U O ry CL F- W W CD Q z Q F-- W w Q n IQ - O O N n W Q J > Z O Z 1= wQ C) U O U F- O W >-- O U a Q CY U O n W W O ry PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Sewers PROJECT Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Gearty Park Water Quality Pond (SS #10) EXPENDITURE TIMING $110,000 2002 2003 1 2004 2005 $110.000 DESCRIPTION: Construction of water quality pond in Gearty Park in conjunction with Pavement Management Program (See S #1). JUSTIFICATION: Improve water quality of Bassett Creek. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Increased expenditures for pond maintenance. 153 $110,000 W dOOdd iN3N3AOddW1 -, lld`d0 90—ZOOZ �3��VA N3MOO JO J�110 d`d W NO liVOO-1 iO3 O ld NV2J9OiJd iN]NIOVNVVI 1N3W3AVd 9002 PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Sewers PROJECT FINANCING: Tax Increment Bonds TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRO ECT DESCRIPTION Buffer Zone — Golden Hills Drive Pond (SS #11) EXPENDITURE TIMING $15,000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 15100!2j I I 1 1 $15,000 DESCRIPTION: Establish native vegetation in and around the storm sewer pond on south side of Golden Hills Drive between Xenia Ave. and Colorado Ave., just north of Holiday Inn Express. JUSTIFICATION: Provide additional water quality benefits and bank stabilization. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Reduced frequency and expenditures for pond dredging. 154 i I E o �- > of m LLI i > Z LLJ 0 LA I LLJ 4 _�1 < < . ......... . -S-'3AV OOV80100 N30100 ---------- PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Sewers PROJECT FINANCING: Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Street Sweeper (SS #12) EXPENDITURE TIMING $100,000 2002 2003 1 2004 1 2005 100.000 DESCRIPTION: New street sweeper to replace Unit 732, 1995 Elgin Sweeper. JUSTIFICATION: Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 732, which will be eleven years old. EFFECT ON OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Reduced maintenance expenditures and downtime on sweepers. 155 M $100,000 CONSERVATION/ RECYCLING FUND REVENUE DETAIL - 146- Revenue )unty Grant (1) scycling Charges (2) lerest Earnings TOTALS CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY CONSERVATION / RECYCLING FUND REVENUE DETAIL Actual 2000 Adopted 2001 Estimated 2001 Adopted 2002 Percent Percent Percent Percent Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total $59,838 20.7% $61,000 21.3% $60,000 20.9% $60,000 20.9% 213,757 74.1% 215,000 75.2% 215,000 74.9% 215,000 74.9% 15,037 5.2% 10,000 3.5% 12,000 4.2% 12,000 4.2% $288,632 100.0% $286,000 100.0% $287,000 100.0% $287,000 100.0% Based on a $.74 / household monthly reimbursement rate for 2001 and 2002. I Based on the following quarterly charges to residential units: 2001 2002 Single - Family (Up to a 4-Plex) $8.00 $8.00 -147- CONSERVATION/ RECYCLING FUND EXPENDITURE DETAIL mil: CONSERVATION / RECYCLING DIVISION This division, which has been accounted for in a separate fund since 1991, coordinates the City's conservation and recycling projects. Current projects include curbside recycling, brush pickup and leaf drop off. Expenditures: Supplies and Services - Includes under "Postage" and "General Notices & Information" the cost of the newsletter pages devoted to recycling and the special mailings to residents informing them of recycling activities. Includes under "Professional Services" the expenditures for various contractors to perform the following services: Curbside Recycling $183,260 Brush Pick -Up (Spring) 64,000 Leaf Drop Off 8,200 The recycling contract with Waste Management for curbside recycling provides for a monthly charge that will vary with the market value of the various recyclables that Waste Management collects. The 2002 appropriation is based on the highest monthly amount that the City could be charged, which looks realistic given the current depressed market rates for the various recyclables. The cost of the contracted annual brush pickup has increased significantly since 1999, due to the closing of the Maple Grove dump site. This means that the brush has to be hauled to a dump site further out, thereby increasing the cost to the contractor. We are anticipating this same situation in 2002. The City's apartment recycling program was phased out effective 01/01/97. Transfers Out - Includes the overhead transfer to the General Fund to pay for the services provided by the General Fund divisions. Also includes the overhead transfer to the Storm Sewer Utility Fund to pay for a portion of the services of the Environmental Coordinator position. This position responsible for the recycling program among its other duties. -149- STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND REVENUE DETAIL -152- Revenue Storm Sewer Charges (1) Transfer From Conservation/Recycling Fund Interest Earnings TOTALS CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND REVENUE DETAIL Actual 2000 Adopted 2001 Estimated 2001 Adopted 2002 Percent Percent Percent Percent Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total $813,965 92.1% $1,170,000 97.1% $1,170,000 95.5% $1,350,000 95.9% 0 0.0% 5,000 0.4% 5,000 0.4% 7,000 0.5% 69,580 7.9% 30,000 2.5% 50,000 4.1% 50,000 3.6% $883,545 100.0% $1,205,000 100.0% $1,225,000 100.0% $11407,000 100.0% (1) 2002 adopted revenue based on a residential rate of $14.00\Qtr. as compared to $12.00\Qtr. in 2001. -153- STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND EXPENDITURE DETAIL -154- STORM SEWER DIVISION This division maintains and improves the City's storm sewer system. This division includes the storm sewer maintenance, street cleaning and environmental control programs. The environmental control program, which was new in 1999, involves the implementation of the Storm Water Management Plan, the enforcement of water quality and erosion control policies and other environmental matters in the City. This fund will receive a transfer from the Conservation / Recycling Fund to compensate for the time spent by the Environmental Coordinator on the Recycling Program. Expenditures: Personal Services - the salaries and wages in this division are from work done by employees of other divisions, a maintenance employee assigned to this department and the Environmental Coordinator (the reclassified Forester position from the General Fund): Streets $55,000 Water & Sewer Utility 36,000 Environmental Coordinator 36,835 Supplies and Services - Includes under "Rentals" the cost of renting specialized equipment to maintain storm sewers and storm water ponds. This maintenance work is done to maintain the flow of storm water through the system and not for aesthetic purposes. — Includes under "Other Contractual Services" the City's annual payment to the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission. Transfers Out - Includes the overhead transfer to the General Fund to pay for this division's administrative support. Capital Outlay - Pavement Management & Storm Water Management Plan Projects $900,000 Storm sewer improvements are made in conjunction with the annual pavement management projects. Prior to 2001, these improvements were financed from the Storm Sewer Improvement Fund, but the fund balance of this fund has been depleted. Therefore, the Storm Sewer Utility will be the main source of financing for these improvements. - 155- City of o den Valley Open Space & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes Brookview Community Center November 25, 2002 — 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Liz Elder, Chuck Cahill, Tom Kuelbs, Jr., Jim Vaughan, Tom Zins, Jim Johnson, Lance Ness and Jerry Sandler. City Staff: Rick Jacobson, Director of Parks & Recreation Sheila Van Sloun, Administrative Secretary Brian Erickson, Recreation Supervisor Jeff Oliver, City Engineer Others Present: Glen Van Wormer, SEH Absent: Roger McConico III. AGENDA CHANGES OR ADDITIONS None. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —September 23, 2002 MOTION: Moved by Chuck Cahill, seconded by Tom Zins, to approve the minutes. Motion carried. V. BROOKVIEW PARKWAY AND PARKING LOT DESIGN Jeff Oliver, City Engineer and Glen Van Wormer, SEH Representative, presented a proposed parking lot design. The proposed design consists of the following: • 90 degree parking with 20-24 foot drive lanes for two way traffic • Two-way traffic on both the east and west drive lanes • A median on the north end of the lot to split traffic heading south • A new curb at the south entrance to direct traffic into the lot • 20-25 additional parking spaces Jerry Sandler then expressed concern for the seniors, stating that it is easier to get in and out of the current 60 degree angled parking and thought it may be more difficult with 90 degree straight parking. BROOKVIEW PARKWAY AND PARKING LOT DESIGN (cont.) Jerry also said that he thought having two-way traffic would cause more congestion and commotion, especially with golf carts and delivery trucks sharing the lanes. Glen Van Wormer stated he has observed facilities with this type of lot design and felt the proposed would have less congestion and be more orderly. Jerry Sandler asked staff how they felt about the new design. Rick stated that it had been discussed at a staff meeting and the consensus was that with limited space for drive lanes, the angled parking was preferred because it provided easier parking access, then 90 -degree spots. Barb Bailey felt angled parking was much easier for seniors to use. Jerry then asked each commissioner for their opinion of the new design. After additional discussion, the following motion was made. MOTION: Moved by Lance Ness and seconded by Jim Vaughan to accept the new 90 -degree, two-way plan. Motion carried (Ayes -7, Nays -1). It was then requested that the Engineer meet with Barb Bailey to discuss the options. Discussion then turned to Brookview Parkway. Jeff Oliver explained that the Parkway, all park parking lots and Western Avenue will be reconstructed with curbs and gutters. He also stated that parking will be allowed only on the park side of the road. Jeff explained that it is expected that the work will be done this summer. Rick mentioned that timing is critical because of the heavy park use and that with picnic shelter reservations being taken in mid-January, we need to let users know there will be extensive construction in progress. 'I. RECREATION REPORT — BRIAN ERICKSON Brian Erickson distributed a summary of the 2002 summer programs. He explained highlights from the summer and answered questions from the Commission. Tom Kuelbs, Jr. asked why the attendance for Supervised Batting Practice was down. Liz Elder mentioned that she thinks the numbers may be down because the kids remembered waiting around a lot, therefore not getting as much hitting practice as desired. Rick explained that when numbers were higher there was waiting and kids would help field balls. Liz Elder suggested offering Girls Volleyball and LaCrosse. Tom Kuelbs, Jr. suggested a Rock Climbing wall. VII. FEES & CHARGES Rick Jacobson explained the fees and charges for the upcoming year and answered questions. MOTION: Moved by Jim Johnson and seconded by Liz Elder, to approve the fees and charges for 2003. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. BUDGET UPDATE Rick Jacobson discussed Concerts in the Park, explaining that they are cut for 2003 due primarily to the park area construction, but will be added again in 2004. IX. WIRTH BEACH STUDY UPDATE No updated. X. OTHER BUSINESS Jerry Sandler asked about having someone come and speak about tobacco use in the parks. Rick Jacobson explained that he would try and arrange for someone to be present at the January meeting. Tom Kuelbs, Jr. expressed concern about waste receptacles and dog waste on trails in the General Mills Research area. Rick said that he would talk with Park Maintenance about the situation. XI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Lance Ness, seconded by Chuck Cahill to adjourn. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m.