2006-08-28 Jt Mtg Agenda PacketAGENDA
GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
AND
PLANNING COMMISSION
Joint Meeting
Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Conference Room
Monday, August 28, 2006
6:00 PM
Joint Meeting
I. Lighting Plan/Ordinance (Attachments)
Individual Commissions Adiourn to Separate Rooms
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes — June 26, 2006 (Attachment)
III. Results of Trash Receptacle Inventory (Attachments)
IV. Publicly Acknowledge, Recognize and Thank Tracy Pharr for her
Service to the Environmental Commission
V. Inflow and Infiltration
A. Municipal Utility Code Revisions (Attachments)
B. Communications Plan (Attachment)
C. Response to MCES regarding Surcharge
VI. Program/Project Updates —
A. Sunnyridge Lane Soil Contaminants
B. Three Rivers Park District Trail (Regional Bicycle Plan)
C. Ad Hoc Deer Task Force
D. Lighting Plan/Ordinance
E. Proposed Developments
1. LOGIS
2. Miner/Olympic Printing Site (Attachment)
3. Duke Development/St. Louis Park/AUAR
F. Open Space & Recreation Commission Minutes — June 26, 2006
(Receive and File)
GAEnvironmental Commission\Agendas\2006\082806.doc
VII. Commission Member Council Reports
VIII. Other Business
IX. Adjourn
Date: August 21, 2006
n�
ire t t: o r a n d u
Planning
763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax)
To: Golden Valley Environmental and Planning Commissions
From: Aaron Hanauer, Planning Intern
Subject: Outdoor Lighting Ordinance
Summary
This memo contains a draft outdoor lighting ordinance to be reviewed by the
Environmental and Planning Commissions at the August 28, joint meeting. The draft
ordinance, which incorporates input from the March 27, Joint Planning and
Environmental Commission meeting (March 27 Summary below), would create
outdoor lighting standards for private property.
To help understand the technical information and proposed standards, the attached
document includes illustrations, explanations, and research information within the
proposed ordinance. If you have questions prior to the August 28 meeting, please feel
free to call.
March 27 Joint Environmental and Planning Commission Meeting Summary
Selected Meeting Minutes
Strong agreement on the following:
Ensure safety is not sacrificed
Implement restrictions on uplighting (exception flag poles and perhaps
lighting that shines completely onto building)
Allow athletic events and venues to have some protection from ordinance
Survey Results
Nine of the 12 members completed surveys that asked what Commission members
want addressed in an outdoor lighting ordinance. Below are the compiled results.
Rank the outdoor lighting issues in order of importance (Top 4)
1. Overillumination
2. Wasted energy
3. Up lighting/sky glow
4. Height of poles
2. What zoning districts do you want addressed in the ordinance
• All zoning districts 44 %
• All zoning districts excluding low density residential 44%
• Commercial only 11%
Attachment:
Draft Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (19 pages)
outdoor Lit4.41111
Standards
0
INGOldclValicy
Draft outdoor lighting ordinance for Planning and Environmental Commission review
Outdoor Liahtinp- Ordinance (Section 11.73)
Table of Contents
Subdivision 1.
Purpose. 4
Subdivision 2.
Definitions. 4
Subdivision 3.
Applicability. 7
Subdivision 4.
Prohibited Lights. 7
Subdivision 5.
Method of Measurement. 8
Subdivision 6.
Nonconformities and Nuisance. 8
Subdivision 7.
Lighting Plan Requirements. 8
Subdivision 8.
Requirements for Residential (R1 and R2) Zoning Districts. 9
Subdivision 9.
General Requirements for other zoning districts (Non R -I and R-2 Proper
ties). 10
Subdivision 10.
Specific Requirements for Parking Lot Lighting. 11
Subdivision 11.
Specific Requirements for Service Stations. 14
Subdivision 12.
Specific Requirements for Auto Sales Areas. 14
Subdivision 13. Requirements for Uplighting and Accent Lighting. 18
Subdivision 14. Temporary Lighting. 18
Figures
Figure 1.
Cutoff Angle Illustrations 5
Figure 2.
Light meter readings in GoldenValley 6
Figure 3.
Fixture Shielding 7
Figure 4.
ParkingLot Photometric Plan Proposed Basic Level
Figure 5.
Parking Lot Photometric Plan Proposed Enhanced Level
Figure 6.
Service Station Proposed Lighting Level Illustration.
Figure 7.
Auto Dealership Photometric: Rudy Luther 17
Figure 8.
Auto Dealership Photometric: Carousel 18
Notes
Note 1. Importance of Uniformity Ratio 7
Note 2. Parking lot lighting level explanation. 12
Note 3. Service station lighting level explanation. 15
Note 4. Autodealerhsip lighting explanation 15
13
14
16
Figurel
Cutoff Angle
Illustrations
Subdivision 1. Purpose.
The purpose of these regulations is to create standards for outdoor lighting which will provide for
nighttime safety, security and utility while reducing light pollution, light trespass, and conserving
energy for residential and non- residential properties.
Subdivision 2. Definitions.
For the purpose of this Section the following terms shall have the meanings given.
A. "Cutoff' — The point at which all light rays emitted by a lamp, light source, or
luminary is completely eliminated (cutoff) at a specific angle above the ground.
B. "Cutoff Angle" — The maximum angle formed by a line drawn in the direc-
tion of emitted light rays at the light source and a line perpendicular to the ground from the light
source.
Cutoff Ansoe of 94 " cmnff .angle oW 0 lie -Cutoff la mlaake
C. "Flood Lighting" —Any light fixture or lamp that incorporates a reflector or a
refractor to concentrate the light output into a directed beam in a particular direction with a wide
or narrow beam.
D. "Footcandle" — The American unit used to measure the total amount of light
cast on a surface (illuminance). One (1) footcandle is equivalent to the illuminance produced by
a source of one (1) candle at a distance of one (1) foot (See Figure 2 for footcandle measure-
ments in Golden Valley. )
E. "Full Cutoff -Type Luminary"—A luminary constructed or shielded to direct all
light at a cutoff angle of less than 90 degrees.
F. "Fully Shielded" — The luminary designed and installed where no light is emit-
ted at or above a horizontal plane running through the lowest point on the luminary.
G. "Glare" — Direct light emitted from a light source which causes eye discomfort.
Page -
Figure 2.
Light meter
readings in
GoldenValley
Page 6
UgM JlM& ReadhW on YLOe and PrNalb FlmperV
Location
Where Measured
Footcandles
Car Dealerships
Crorsel
Frmd row
73
Rudy L.uRKr
Frord roti
49S
Co nrnercral
aV_ [:bnwr ons
Under Doublp
123
fdenaffds
Under srIe
Trmh Shoppng (krdor
underioor heed
3,5
ErdnUER
31
Fast Food
mcc umids
Under 4ngle
30
Tem 9d1
Under double atdriw thnu%4jh
17.1
Wends
under double
17.1
Public Uses4m6tubons
Break
Under double
Q75
CHH "a end F'aice Sirl;m
Under single
3,5
Underdorbte
3.7
Gilden "k LuHwan Di rch
urrderdouble
dLSB
FznA Sean. LiUtrl
Under s4e
1.9
Puss Ofiee
Under DorbAe
133
sheetwd
Under H S 25D Bret
2.$
Across Hie sbml
Q.fi
Office
Ferre Fig
Unrkr do bie
23
Genre 11�
Under single
1-2
Gaklen Fiffs
Underdorble
12Jd
YV- th Q..s,ivess QrJor
Under sidle
1_12
Restarxanfs
Perthes 55
U nder derbie
1.7
Pas6 138#
Under doable
3
Servk-e Stations
BP
under Canopy
37
SWerAma® 384
28
I H. "IESNA (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IES or IES -
NA))" — The professional society of lighting engineers, including those from manufacturing
companies, and others professionally involved in lighting.
I. "Lamp" — The generic term for an artificial light source, to be distinguished
from the whole assembly (the Luminary). The lamp is commonly referred to as the "bulb".
J. "Light Pollution" — The shining of light produced by a luminary above the
height of the luminary and into the sky.
K. "Light Trespass" — The shining of light produced by a luminary beyond the
boundaries of the property on which it is located.
L. "Lumen' —A quantitative unit measuring the amount of light emitted from a
light source.
M. "Luminary" — A complete lighting unit consisting of a lamp or lamps together
with the parts designed to distribute the light, to position and protect the lamps and to connect the
lamps to be powered. A luminary is commonly referred to as a "fixture."
N. "Partially shielded" — The condition where the luminary incorporates a trans-
lucent barrier, "partial shield," around the lamp that allows some light to pass through the barrier
while concealing the lamp from the viewer.
O. "Shielded(ing)" — When the light emitted from the fixture is projected below
a horizontal plane running through the lowest point of the fixture where the light is emitted. The
bulb is not visible with a shielded light fixture, and no light is emitted from the sides of the fix-
ture. Also considered a "full cut-off fixture."
Figure Fully Shielded Fixture
3. Fixture
Shielding
Partially Shielded Fixture
Unshielded Fixture
P. "Uniformity Ratio' — A description of the smoothness of the lighting pattern or
the degree of intensity of light and dark areas in the area to be lighted. Uniformity is expressed as
a ratio such of the maximum footcandle measurement to minimum footcandle measurement. The
lower the ratio the more uniform the lighting design.
Note 1. niform lighting is often more important t—fin tie amount of lighting when establishing the
Importance ense of a safe, well -lit area. Non-uniform lighting can reduce visibility with the presence of
of Uniformity ark spots and shadows.
Ratio
Q. "Uplighting" — Lighting that is directed in such a manner as to shine light rays
above the horizontal plane.
R. "Wallpacks"— A light fixture that mounts on the wall.
Page -
Subdivision 3. Applicability.
A. Except as otherwise provided, the lighting standards of this Section shall be
applicable to all residential and non-residential uses.
B. The regulations in this Section do not apply to the following:
eral or state agency.
1. Lighting required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other fed -
2. Public right-of-way lighting.
3. Temporary lighting for authorized special events, theatrical, television,
and performance areas.
4. Lighting of public and existing outdoor recreational facilities, such as
but not �imited to ball fields, tennis courts, soccer fields, hockey or skating rinks, golf courses,
golf -ball driving ranges, and special events or play areas. Lighting for these outdoor recreational
uses shall be shielded to minimize light from spilling over onto adjacent residential properties.
Public recreational facility lighting is prohibited after 10:30 pm, unless a later completion time is
approved by the City Manager, or his/her designee.
5. Lighting within swimming pools.
6. Temporary lighting used for the construction or repair of roadways,
utilities, and other public infrastructure.
7. Vehicular lights and all temporary emergency lighting needed by the
police department and fire protection district, or other emergency services.
8. Sign lighting which is governed by Section 4.20 of City Code.
9. Decorative Seasonal Lighting.
Subdivision 4. Prohibited Lights.
A. The following lights are prohibited:
1. Mercury Vapor lamps.
2. Low pressure sodium. Low Pressure Sodium lights are prohibited unless
the City Manager or his/her designee finds that the color distortion effect of low pressure sodium
lighting will not create a hindrance to crime prevention and investigation.
3. Lighting fixtures mounted to aim light only toward a property line.
Page - 8
Subdivision 5. Method of Measurement.
A. Any light measurements shall be taken with a light meter with cosine, color
correction. Measurements shall be taken with a light meter that has been calibrated within the
year. Any measurements shall be measured by positioning the meter horizontally at finished
grade (ground level).
B. Any light measurement taken at the property line shall be measured at the
greatest point of illumination of said property line. If measurement on private property is not
possible or practical, light level measurements may be made at the boundary of the public street
right-of-way that adjoins the property of the complainant or at any other location on the property
of the complainant.
C. Any light measurements to determine the minimum and maximum lighting
levels internal to a site will be taken at the greatest and least points of artificial illumination.
Subdivision 6. Nonconformities and Nuisance.
A. Any new outdoor lighting installed after the effective date of this ordinance
shall comply with the requirements of this Section. Lighting in existence before the effective date
of this ordinance that does not comply with the requirements hereof shall be considered legally
non -conforming to the extent provided by the terms of Section 11.90, subd. 2.
B. Any nonconforming luminary which is injurious to health, or offensive to the
senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoy-
ment of life or property is hereby declared to be a nuisance. Evidence that a nonconforming
luminary directs glare to other private property located in a residential zoning district at a level of
illumination caused by the luminary equal to or greater than 0.5 footcandles on the other private
property creates a presumption that it is a public nuisance. Such fixtures shall be altered to re-
duce the level of illumination in the residential zoning district to less than 0.3 footcandles within
30 days of receiving a written notice from the City Manager or his/her designee. If the owner or
occupier of the property containing the nuisance fails to correct the level of illumination within
such 30 day period, such failure to correct shall be deemed to be a continuing violation of this
section.
Subdivision 7. Lighting Plan Requirements.
An outdoor lighting (photometric) plan shall be submitted in conjunction with application for any
non R-1 or R-2 development for review by the City. No building permits shall be issued for, nor
construction commenced of, any multiple -dwelling or nonresidential development until a photo-
metric plan has been submitted to the City and approved by the City as being consistent with the
terms of this Section. A photometric plan shall include the following:
A. The location and height above grade of each light fixture.
Page--
B. The type (such as incandescent, halogen, high pressure sodium) and luminous
intensity of each light source with points no greater than 30 feet apart.
C. The type of fixture (such as floodlight, full -cutoff, lantern, coach light).
D. Estimates for site illumination resulting from the lighting, as measured in foot-
candlesb should include minimum, maximum and average illumination. Comparable examples
already in the community that demonstrate technique, specification, and/or light level should be
provided if available to expedite the review process.
E. Hours of illumination.
F. Certification by the property owner or agent and the preparer of the plan that
the extgrior lighting depicted on the plan complies with the requirements of this Section. Once
the plan is approved, the exterior lighting of the property shall conform to the plan.
G. Other information deemed necessary may also be required by the City Man-
ager or his/her designee to document compliance with the provisions of this Section.
H. If deemed necessary, the City may require the applicant's outdoor lighting plan
to be reviewed by a lighting consultant at the applicant's expense.
Subdivision 8. Requirements for Residential (R1 and R2) Zoning Districts.
The provisions in this Subdivision apply to the R1 and R2 Zoning Districts.
A. Lighting Levels. The maximum power of any light source shall be 150 watts.
B. Light Trespass. All outdoor lighting shall be designed and located such that the
rnaximum illumination shall not exceed 0.3 footcandles at the property line.
C. Security Lights. Motion activated security lights and unshielded floodlights or
spotlights are permitted. However they must be mounted and aimed in a manner that minimizes
up -lighting, glare, and meet the light trespass requirements of Section 8B.
Page - 10
Subdivision 9. General Requirements for other zoning districts (Non R-1 and R-2 Proper-
ties). The following provisions apply in all areas except for R1 and R2 zoning districts.
A. Lighting Fixtures. All exterior lighting shall use full cut-off luminaries with the
light source downcast and fully shielded, with the following exceptions:
1. Luminaries that have a maximum output of four hundred (400) lumens
per fixture, regardless of number of lamps (equal to one forty [40] watt incandescent light), may
be left unshielded provided if the luminary has an opaque top and is under an opaque structure.
2. Luminaries that have a maximum output of one thousand (1,000) lu-
mens per fixture, regardless of number of lamps (equal to one sixty [60] watt incandescent light)
may be partially shielded provided the lamp is not visible, and the luminary has an opaque top or
is under an opaque structure.
3. If the design of an area suggests the use of parking lot lighting fixtures
or building fixtures that are of a particular architectural style, the City Manager or his/her desig-
nee may permit alternatives to full -cut off fixtures. The developer shall demonstrate that unde-
sirable off-site impacts stemming from these light sources are reduced by the fixture design or
location of the lighting fixture.
4. Uplighting/Accent Lighting described in Subdivision 13A.
B. Light Trespass. Outdoor lighting shall be designed and located such that the
maximum illumination shall not exceed 0.5 footcandles at the property line.
C. Mounting Height. For the purpose of these regulations, the mounting height of
a lighting fixture shall be defined as the vertical distance from the grade elevation of the surface
being illuminated to the bottom of the lighting fixture.
1. Free-standing luminaries used for driveways, parking, and transit are
permitted to be a maximum of thirty (30) feet in height. If a raised foundation is required in
parking areas to protect the poles from automobile front bumpers, the raised foundation and pole
may not exceed thirty-three 33 feet.
2. When a luminary is located within five hundred 500 feet of an R1 or R2
residential property, the maximum permitted luminary height, including base, shall be twenty-
five (25) feet.
3. Exceptions for pole heights. The top exterior deck of parking garages
shall be treated as normal pole mounted lighting rather than as lights mounted to buildings. The
maximum height for light poles shall be twenty (20) feet.
4. Free-standing luminaries used for walkways, plazas and other pedes-
trian areas are permitted to be a maximum of eighteen (18) feet.
Page - 17
I
D. Timer, Dimmers, and Sensors. Wherever practicable, lighting installation shall
include timers, dimmers, and/or sensors to reduce overall energy consumption and eliminate un-
needed lighting.
E. Curfew. Lighting systems for non R -I and R-2 properties shall be extinguished
or reduced in lighting by at least fifty (50) percent beginning one hour after close of business and
continuing until dawn or start of business, whichever is sooner. The reduction shall be deter-
mined 's an overall average for the site. Given that a certain minimum lighting level is recom-
menZ for safety and security purposes, this provision does not require parking lot lighting
levels to be reduced to less than 0.2 footcandles.
Subdivision 10. Specific Requirements for Parking Lot Lighting.
The following specific lighting level requirements apply only to parking lot lighting.
A. Open-air parking lot lighting shall be designed to provide for uniform lighting
throughout the facility with no dark patches or pockets.
B. For multilevel parking facilities, the roof level shall be considered an open-air
parking lot.
C. Open-air parking lot lighting standards. The table below establishes open-air
parking lot lighting standards.
*The City Manager or his/her designee may increase from Basic to Enhanced Security light-
ing levels, when personal security is an issue, such as where the parking facility is used during
all hours of the day and night, where special security needs exist, or where vandalism or crime
levels are greater than the average. The City Manager or his/her designee may consider specific
site characteristics, level of vehicle and pedestrian conflict, special security needs, and history or
likelihood of crimes in making its determination.
Note 2. Figure 4 and 5 provide examples of how two developments would fair under the proposed
Parking lot parking lot lighting standards. Figure 4 shows compliance levels based on the basic level
lighting level requirements, and Figure 5 illustrates compliance levels with the enhanced security level
explanation. requirements. Figure 5 also shows light trespass levels, which is a requirement of the pro-
posed ordinance.
Page - 12
Basic Level
Enhanced Secuhty Level'
Nrimm lloo mmles an
pwimment
0-2 fic
0_5 fc
Nbximim foolk2ndes on
4-0 ft<
7,5 fc
Urilormity Ratio
NUAmi t_ nkirnr.rin
213=1
15.1
*The City Manager or his/her designee may increase from Basic to Enhanced Security light-
ing levels, when personal security is an issue, such as where the parking facility is used during
all hours of the day and night, where special security needs exist, or where vandalism or crime
levels are greater than the average. The City Manager or his/her designee may consider specific
site characteristics, level of vehicle and pedestrian conflict, special security needs, and history or
likelihood of crimes in making its determination.
Note 2. Figure 4 and 5 provide examples of how two developments would fair under the proposed
Parking lot parking lot lighting standards. Figure 4 shows compliance levels based on the basic level
lighting level requirements, and Figure 5 illustrates compliance levels with the enhanced security level
explanation. requirements. Figure 5 also shows light trespass levels, which is a requirement of the pro-
posed ordinance.
Page - 12
Figure 4.
ParkingLot
Photometric
Plan Pro-
posed Basic
Level
C; c; .6 .6
..1; .1z
A'.2 d.-
41—
QI; c-;
.6 C5
4M .6
C
�c
14
. . . . ..... . . .
O
& . . . . . . .
Compliance PFOjOd P4TrKww GUVMXffd GNM*
Non-compliance Drives'Ind Parking Average Maximum Minimum AveragelMin LUX/Min
1.55 5-a 05 3-1 112
Fage -77
Figure 5.
Parking Lot
Photometric
Plan P;
posed l
hanced
Compliance
F777-1 Non-compliance
i --i Light Trespass
Page - 14
Project New Sam's Club (Saint Louis Park)
Drives and Parking Average Maximum Minimum Average/Min Max/Min
1.3 15.5 0.2' 6.5 77.5
Note': Actual minimum is 0
Subdivision 11. Specific Requirements for Service Stations.
The following specific requirements apply only to service stations:
Note 3. Ser- Service stations often have some of the righest outdoor lighting levels. The high lighting
vice station lighting levels are beyond what is needed to see well, or to provide a safe and secure environ -
lighting level ment. The proporsed standards for this ordinance are taken from other communities that have
explanation. a comprehensive outdoor lighting ordinance and permit service stations to have greater outdoor
,,lighting levels than parking lots. Figure 6 provides an illustration of the proposed standards.
A. Canopy Lighting.
1. Lighting fixtures mounted under canopies used for vehicle shelter shall
be aimed downward and installed such that the bottom of the light fixture or its lens, whichever
is lower, is recessed or mounted flush with the bottom surface of the canopy. A full cutoff light
fixture may project below the underside of a canopy. All light emitted by an under -canopy fixture
shall be substantially confined to the ground surface directly beneath the perimeter of the canopy.
2. Lights shall not be mounted on the top or sides (fascias) of the canopy,
and the sides (fascias) of the canopy shall not be illuminated.
3. Light levels shall not exceed twelve (12) footcandles average main-
tained at the perimeter of the canopy and measured at ground level.
B. The minimum illumination beyond the perimeter of the canopy shall be one (1)
footcandle and no more than five (5) footcandles. At the discretion of the City Manager or his/her
designee, increased lighting levels may be permitted for enhanced security purposes only.
Note 4. Subdivision 12. Specific Requirements for Auto Sales Areas.
Autodealerh- A uto dealerships, like service stations, often have some of the highest outdoor lighting levels.
sip lighting Similar to service stations, auto dealership lighting levels are sometimes argued on the basis of
explanation enhanced security. However, as Figure 6 and 7 illustrate, the highest outdoor lighting levels are
�on the perimeter of the lot which is for advertisement purposes. Due to auto dealerships' unique
'circumstances of having most of their retail environment outdoors, the proposed standards al-
low auto dealerships greater amounts of light and higher uniformity ratio.
The following specific requirements apply only to auto sales areas:
A. Lighting Levels. Lighting levels shall not exceed a maximum of twenty (20) footcandles any-
where within an auto sales area.
B. Light Uniformity. The maximum uniformity ratio (maximum illumination to minimum illumi-
nation) throughout an auto sales area shall not exceed 30:1.
Page - 15
rIg" ic v.
Service Sta-
tion Proposed
Lighting
LevelIllus-
tration.
0
E
Page - 16
SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS
Outdoor Lighting - Canopies for Gas and Convenience Stores
ROADWAY
A
r---------------1
I �
i
I
A i': :: i A
L #
A
CAS STATION OR
CONVENIENCE
STORE
own of uary
A LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 12 FC
(average maintained under canopy)
REF SEC:
REVISED:
DETAIL NO:
LG -2
anuai
LTG -5
- -a --- - -
Auto Deal-
ership Pho-
tometric:
Rudv Luther
Compliance
Non-compliance
1
pmkild RWY i LORY %O&
Drives and Parking Average Maximum Minimum AveragelMin #AaxlMin
U 'rm 49.8 02 tk*,rn 249
Page 77
Figure 8.
Auto Deal-
ership Pho-
tometric:
Carousel
Page - IS
0
Compliance MOO'd CmMular/kAb a I 1
Drives and Parking Average Maximum Minimum AveragelMin Max/Min
Non-compliance U km 73 13 Uhki3wn 5
Subdivision 13. Requirements for Uplighting and Accent Lighting.
A. Uplighting/Accent lighting.
1. Architecture features may be illuminated by uplighting, provided that
the light is effectively contained by the structure, the lamps are low intensity to produce a subtle
lighting effect, and no glare or light trespass is produced.
2. For statues, public art, or other objects of interest that cannot be illumi-
nated with downlighting, upward lighting may only be used in the form of confining the illumi-
nation to the object of interest.
3. Uplighting of flags is permitted with a limit of two (2) fixtures per flag
pole with a maximum of one hundred and fifty (150) watts each. The fixtures must be shielded
such that the point source is not visible outside of a fifteen (15) foot radius.
Subdivision 14. Temporary Lighting.
A. Lighting used to illuminate temporary uses shall be reviewed, and if necessary
conditioned, through the Temporary Use Permitting process.
B. The City Manager or his/her designee may impose specific conditions for the
lighting of temporary uses consistent with the purposes of this section.
Page - 19
GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Minutes
June 26, 2006
Present: Commissioners Tracy Anderson; Richard Baker; Dawn Hill; Christopher
Kaisershot; Jon Pawluk; Siah St. Clair; Mauno Silpala;
City Staff: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works; Al Lundstrom, Environmental
Coordinator; Jeff Oliver, City Engineer; Deb Somers, Administrative
Assistant
I. Call to Order
Pawluk called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. Pawluk welcomed Deb Somers to the
Commission as the minute taker.
II. Approval of Minutes — May 22, 2006
No changes.
MOVED by St. Clair, seconded by Silpala, and the motion carried unanimously to
approve the minutes of the May 22, 2006 meeting as submitted.
III. Nature Area Locations of Trash Receptacles (attachment, for review)
Clancy and Kaisershot attended the June 13, 2006 Council/Manager meeting. The
Council asked staff to verify all the locations of the existing nature area trash
receptacles and do a quick study of the volume of trash. They also requested
information about the City's Adopt -A -Park procedures and if staff felt the volunteers who
have adopted parks would be willing to clean the parks more often. The issue regarding
the possibility of more receptacles will be discussed further during the budgeting
process.
Clancy said the one additional maintenance employee requested was not
recommended for inclusion in the budget by the City Manager. She added that a budget
memo has been prepared that will be forwarded to the City Council. Two years ago two
employees were cut from the Public Works Department. Baker asked if the City
Manager explained his thought process for the denial. Clancy replied his concern was
related to limited tax increases, which would be at 9% if all requests were approved.
Pawluk asked if using additional seasonal staff to empty an increased number of trash
receptacles was an option. Clancy replied that the City's heaviest use of parks is often
during the spring and fall which is when seasonal staff, consisting of college students, is
unavailable. College students are not available until late May and often leave in
Environmental Commission Minutes
June 26, 2006
Page 2 of 10
September to go back to school. Staff typically uses college students because they
have a driver's license and because of the supervision issues.
Kaisershot asked if with what the Commission is proposing requires additional staffing
but the City Manager is not recommending additional staff, it sounds like the proposal
will be dead on arrival once it gets to the City Council if the City does not have the staff
to do it. Clancy explained that two things were going on; the Council is considering the
Environmental Commission's request, and staff also put in a request to have one out of
two staff positions lost two years ago filled. It would be very difficult to take on a new
maintenance activity unless that full time position is funded. Public Works Maintenance
Division is short 4,160 hours of work that needs to be done.
Lundstrom said maintenance work is not status quo each year. With the addition of such
projects as medians with plantings being added maintenance loads automatically
increase just with the development of the infrastructure around City Hall. Staff would like
to increase service levels, but it is a challenge. Kaisershot asked if the map attached to
the agenda was the same map the Commission saw previously; Clancy confirmed it
was.
Kaisershot asked who ran the Adopt -A -Park program. Clancy advised the program is
managed by the Park & Recreation Department. Volunteers are expected to pick up the
parks twice per year. Kaisershot mentioned there was talk of increasing that to three
times per year, while that would be nice, he felt it would not have that dramatic of an
effect. At the Council/Manager meeting, Kaisershot told the Council that the
Commission certainly was not married to any of the potential trash locations. The 24
locations on the map represented prime locations for additional trash receptacles if
money was no object. Council asked staff do an inventory to find out what was being
disposed of in each receptacle and where the Commission would specifically
recommend receptacles be placed.
Clancy advised that the first budget meeting is on the July 11 Council/Manager meeting
and staff would report back to the Commission in August.
IV. Commission's Annual Report Presentation to Council (report by Baker)
Baker reported that there were no questions. Council Member Pentel thanked the
Environmental Commission for their work.
V. 1/1 Comprehensive Communications Plan (for review and feedback)
Staff brought the Communications Plan for Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) back to the
Commission for discussion. Clancy provided an overview of the proposed changes
included in the revised Communications Plan attached to the agenda.
Clancy believes the businesses are probably pretty heavy contributors to 1/1 and the City
is not going to be able to reach them through some of the traditional resources. She
said one strategy not listed, is the possibility of having one-on-one meetings with each
Environmental Commission Minutes
June 26, 2006
Page 3 of 10
business. Pawluk commented that with businesses in the community the City might be
able to take a tougher stance and a more direct approach.
Hill believes that most business owners do not reside in the City and some PSAs
directed at businesses may be a waste of time. She felt a better approach might be
direct mailings and brochures. Clancy agreed and will revise the PSAs to include direct
mailings and a whole brochure directed toward businesses. Hill asked if building
inspectors would be able to go into businesses or would they be conducting the one-on-
one meetings. Clancy explained that should this become one of the elements in the City
Code, any time some one applies for a land use change or building permit, they would
have to submit to an inspection. At the present time the City inspectors cannot go to
businesses to inspect for 1/1 issues unless that business has applied for a permit. Oliver
agreed that most of the data focuses on residential areas and the City would begin the
inspections there first, and then move to businesses.
Baker pointed out that businesses might be worth the extra effort if they have more roof
leaders, etc. Clancy advised that more investigation is needed to determine the extent
of problems for businesses and residential homes. Oliver said the City needs to break
down District 10 into smaller groups. Roof leaders may not be the most common
contributor; condensation coils and some sump pumps may be the more common
problem. The average sump pump can discharge approximately six gallons of water per
minute when it's running.
Silpala asked if there was a time when roof leaders, etc. were sanctioned or
recommended; is it possible to take a systemic approach and look at when an area was
developed. Oliver replied the older the home the higher the likelihood there is a
foundation drain. Typically the majority of homes in the community were built in the
1950's or later and it does not appear foundation drains were tremendously prevalent.
Sump pumps were common from the 1950's up through the 1990's. From the 1950's
and later, roof leaders become more common.
When the Utilities Maintenance staff did the residential meter change out program, all
employees involved were trained to ask the homeowners if they could do a voluntary
sump pump inspection. If homeowners agreed to comply, staff gave them the
educational brochure. Most of the homeowners agreed to comply. However, when the
City is facing a potential $300,000-$500,000 surcharge, its not a department issue, it is
an entire City issue. Clancy believes our City Council, Environmental Commission are
well educated, and that education should be extended to some other City commis-
sioners on our Planning Commission Board, Board of Zoning Appeals, and the Open
Space and Recreation Commission.
School age kids tend to be better educators than their parents. Staff plans to work with
them.
Staff also plans to make sure the real estate professionals practicing in our community
are aware of the seriousness of the 1/1 problem in Golden Valley. Real estate
professionals cross many boundaries, so that will be a real challenge.
Environmental Commission Minutes
June 26, 2006
Page 4 of 10
Hill stated the City does not want real estate agents to direct people away from Golden
Valley causing property values to drop. Oliver said every community around Golden
Valley is facing this issue. Hill asked if the other communities were sharing this issue
with realtors. Oliver said sooner or later everyone is going to be facing this issue in
some shape or form. He would rather lay the bad news out up front than have it be a
surprise to a buyer or a seller.
Pawluk proposed an idea allowing residents the opportunity to budget if in fact they
have to make repairs. He would like to see the homeowner do some self -budgeting to
make the repairs without taking out a loan. If the individual gets approval, the City could
have some sort of mechanism in place that allows residents to move forward with
repairs once they have an amount tucked away in their bank account.
Oliver explained the City has five years to correct the 1/1 issue. During the scope of the
five-year period, it is the City's goal to inspect every building in the community and get
the problems fixed.
Pawluk believes the Council should look at revising the 30 -day window. Clancy advised
that the Council will review the Environmental Commission's feedback and make a
decision. Pawluk suggested the City to get a message out to every homeowner
explaining what the standard will be, the timeframe residents have to comply and give
residents the opportunity to ask the City for the inspection now so they have time to
budget and save because the City is setting up a program to inspect each home.
Kaisershot asked who bears the brunt of the cost. Is there a pool of funds or will each
individual have to pay. Oliver replied that staff will need to discuss cost issues with the
City Council. Once the code is adopted, staff will need to turn the changes around
quickly and finalize just how this plan will work.
Sipala would like to make it as easy to fix as possible, but does not feel those who
followed the rules should have to pay for those who violated the rules. Lundstrom
believes the fall 2006 survey will really drive the Communications Plan. The City will get
a good idea of what people know and don't know about 1/I. He thinks there are quite a
few residents that do not understand that the sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems
are separate.
St. Clair questioned whether or not there would be a fund of money offering low interest
loans available through the MCES. People might be more apt to get the work done if
they could save some dollars. Clancy stated the City will be spending money on its own
system. The utility budget proposed this year includes the inspection program,
replacement of manhole covers, inspections and sewer lining mains has increased
significantly. Setting money aside to help others do repairs on homes is probably not a
reality. The Pavement Management Program is adding a lot of storm sewer and draintile
so residents have the option of hooking up their system.
Environmental Commission Minutes
June 26, 2006
Page 5 of 10
Hill asked if the Environmental Commission was to assign priorities for the potential
strategies. Clancy advised that Weiler would assign these priorities once the strategies
are finalized. These will come back to the Commission for feedback.
Finally, Oliver explained the last component of the Communications Plan is getting the
word out to both private and public inspectors. Sipala asked if City inspectors would
have point of sale inspections. Oliver indicated they would not at this time.
Clancy explained that every CityNews issue would have an article reporting on 1/1. Baker
asked if they would be some kind of mass contact to residents, i.e. notice in the utility
bills. Clancy said there would be announcements made once the inspection program is
final. Focus would be on the upcoming Pavement Management Project area and on
District 10.
Clancy stated that staff had a good meeting with MCES. Staff pointed out to the MCES
that a good share of their system is within the flood plain of Bassett Creek. The MCES
agreed to submit a proposal to the City to repair those areas. A copy of the article that
was in the MCES Newsletter will be forwarded to each Commission member with the
next meeting agenda (the article "Communities Identify Sources of Clear Water Flow
into Sewers," was emailed to all members on July 6, 2006).
VI. Program/Project Updates
Municipal Utility Code Revisions — Oliver explained the four highlights in the revised
code (see cover memo to Council attached to agenda).
All revisions were reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
Kaisershot asked what "discharge" meant. After discussion, it was decided that staff
would review the need to add the definition to the code.
Oliver continued to explain the individual revisions to the code. Kaisershot asked for the
reason behind Section 3.04, Subd. 3. E., that states, `7f the structure receiving service
becomes uninhabitable for any reason". This is in the event of a fire to a structure or a
condemned house, and it authorizes the City to disconnect the water and remove the
meter. Hill suggested removal of the word "If' at the beginning of the sentence. She also
questioned if uninhabitable was an appropriate word to use when talking about a
commercial building. Clancy believes that is defined in the Uniform Building Code.
Oliver will check if uninhabitable is an appropriate word to use.
Oliver continued explaining Section 3.04, Subd. 5, which defines who can go into
dwellings and other buildings on behalf of the City. Pawluk does not believe anyone
should be allowed into one of these structures without notifying the homeowner/
business owner. Oliver will discuss this further with the City Attorney. Section 3.04,
Subd. 6, regarding meter tests was reworded to make it easier to understand.
Environmental Commission Minutes
June 26, 2006
Page 6 of 10
Under Section 3.30, Oliver explained that the City will have a rather large project in the
not too distance future to retrofit District 10 with draintile behind the curb. Kaisershot
asked if there might be an issue of diminishing resources where half the City would be
done this way, but suddenly there are no more funds to continue to do the same for the
rest of the City. Oliver does not believe this issue can be addressed in the code. If there
is a neighborhood that has minimal peak values after major rain events, and there is not
a problem, it might not be necessary to install the draintile.
Kaisershot asked if there is another ordinance that would need to be revised concerning
draintile. Oliver explained that staff will be adding a storm water drainage ordinance to
this chapter of the code. With the addition of this ordinance the City will be able to
address the specifics of rear yard easements, draintile ownership and different aspects
of storm water drainage. This is also where the City will address pumping discharge,
where no draintile exists, into a neighbor's yard.
Clancy advised that the Municipal Utility Code has not been addressed since 1974. It is
in desperate need of being updated. There is no storm sewer section at all. She and
Oliver believe the sanitary sewer part of the code needs to be dealt with first. Water
issues will also need to be addressed, followed by water conservation issues. The Joint
Water Commission (JWC) is having a workshop on water conservation in August. Also
contractual issues will be dealt with. There are too many issues to be dealt with at one
time, so the issues will come before the Commission in a piecemeal way. This code is
the framework to set up the programs.
Kaisershot asked if there was any consideration for preventing discharge onto
neighbors' property with this past term. Oliver stated there was not. Clancy agreed this
is an issue and staff advised the City Manager and the Council that this is program that
staff can take on if given the resources to do so.
Section 3.30, Subd. 3. E. addresses the surcharge to be assessed by the MCES. Oliver
went over how this section would work. When a homeowner is found to be non-
compliant and the City issues them a correction notice, the resident will have 30 days to
resolve the issue. If, upon re -inspection, the problem is repaired, no surcharge will be
assessed. Because there is a history of a problem, the City will return within the year. If
within that year the homeowner is again in violation, the City will add a $500 per month
surcharge to their utility bill. The people who are violating would then be paying, instead
of the compliant homeowners. However, because it has been a year, and staff does not
know when the homeowner switched their sump pump back to discharging into the
sanitary sewer, the City will retroactively charge them that surcharge back to the date of
their last compliant inspection.
Hill asked if charges to the homeowner follow the property. Oliver commented that this
is one thing that needs to be addressed. Kaisershot questioned the second sentence in
paragraph "E". Is the code stating that any residential property that had been inspected
and non-compliant and then became compliant and now again became non-compliant,
does this sentence and the first sentence need to have commas instead of periods.
Oliver will confer with the City Attorney for the correct wording. Clancy stated that this
Environmental Commission Minutes
June 26, 2006
Page 7 of 10
clause came from reviewing ordinances from other cities. Most communities are
charging residents with a $100 surcharge. She said the reason staff decided to increase
the amount to $500 was because of past history with the residential meter replacement
program.
At the Council/Manager meeting Clancy discussed financial aspects of the surcharge
with the Council. The current surcharge is based upon one violation of our peak
allowable last year, which was a dry year. Golden Valley may already have had two
violations this year.
Pawluk pointed out that a lot of the provisions in this code, particularly the more punitive
ones, are geared for people who change from compliance back to non-compliance.
Oliver believes it is easy for do-it-yourselfers to modify sump discharges. Kaisershot
explained that if these people have gone to the trouble of making a change that allows
you to pass the code inspection, why would a resident want to reverse it. Lundstrom
explained that when resident is dumping clear water into your own yard it can cause a
mosquito problem.
Pawluk believes the 30 -day re -inspection could be an unreasonable amount of time to
get the repairs completed, especially during high construction season. He sees two
problems homeowners may have; one being they cannot afford it; and, two they cannot
find a contractor within the 30 -day time period. Pawluk suggested the timeframe be
extended to 60-90 days.
Oliver expressed two concerns with giving residents too much time to comply. One
being it is a public health issue due to discharge of raw sewerage to the Mississippi
River, and if actions are not taken to comply, the MCES has the authority to say no to
new development.
St. Clair asked if the $500 per month surcharge is meant for a person who came into
compliance and then purposely reconnected to sanitary sewer so they went out of
compliance. Oliver agreed it was and added it might also be the person that refuses to
come into compliance.
Hill asked how long the homeowner (compliant or non-compliant) that was non-
compliant, but made the correction would be subject to future re -inspections. Oliver
cannot answer that question; it is a detail of the program to be developed. Hill stated the
first inspection seems to drive the re -inspections. Oliver agreed. The code states
residents are subject to an annual re -inspection, it does not say it goes on into
perpetuity. Pawluk sees a problem with a situation where a resident is being re-
inspected this year and then there is no inspection the next year, but the following year
the re -inspection shows a problem. Would the surcharge be retroactive 24 months or 12
months because the City failed to come back the in between year.
Oliver explained that the City has to manage this program. If a resident has a history of
non-compliance, the City will re -inspect the house every year. If someone is in
compliance 4-5 years its possible they can be dropped from the re -inspections list. This
Environmental Commission Minutes
June 26, 2006
Page 8 of 10
is something that has to be worked out yet. Pawluk would like a statement added to the
code that the City will use discretion in re -inspections. Oliver stated residents can count
on the fact that they will continue to be subject to re -inspections. If you apply for a
permit for any remodeling, addition, etc, an inspector will come out and look for
violations.
St. Clair inquired about a situation where somebody buys a house, which has been non-
compliant, and suddenly an inspector arrives and it has been 24 months since an
inspector was there and you owe $12,000, who pays. Anderson asked if there was a
final adjustment done on the water bill when you leave your residence. Clancy advised
that there is a final billing.
Kaisershot gave a solution for St. Clair's question about when the surcharge begins. A
person that does not allow you to re -inspect, does not necessarily fall under this
provision. He suggested the following changes to paragraph "E", page 32, second
sentence. Any residential property found not to be in compliance upon re -inspection, or
any person refusing to allow their property to be re -inspected within 30 days after
receipt of mailed written notice from the City, shall be
subject to a nonrefundable surcharge of $500 per month, to be imposed on every sewer
bill. Oliver agreed. He will update the code with the changes and forward it to the City
Attorney for review. Oliver believes that adding a mandatory inspection when residents
call to shut off their water service, or switch it over to the new owner when you sell,
should cover the above as well. That way if the person selling the house is non-
compliance they would get billed for the surcharge; not the new owner.
Kaisershot suggested putting a cap, of up to $6,000, on the surcharge for non-
compliance residents. Oliver explained that if a person is not in compliance, they should
be paying for the 1/1 discharge they are causing. Anderson asked if any of the
surrounding communities prorate the discharge. Oliver said it is very difficult to do.
Oliver next went over Section 3.30, Subd. 4 Winter Discharge, and Subd. 9 Ownership
of Sewer Service Lateral. Kaisershot asked what a sewer service lateral was. Oliver
explained it is the service line from the main in the middle of the street to where the pipe
enters a home. There was a discussion about the interpretation of the city code defining
the homeowner's responsibility for the sanitary sewer lateral. Oliver explained the
homeowner is responsible for the sanitary sewer lateral from the home to where it
connects to the main in the street. This is the case in the vast majority of metro cities.
Pawluk and Hill asked who would be responsible for any damage to a line in the street.
Clancy said this would be rare since the line is 6-8 feet below the street. Kaisershot
asked what could happen to the pipe besides the usual wear. Oliver and Lundstrom
said damage could be caused by a crushed pipe, tree roots, joints in the clay did not
seat quite right or sag from settling soils. Clancy explained that the lateral line has no
benefit to the overall public; it serves that particular homeowner only. There is no
justification for the City at large to pay for repairs to the lateral.
Concerning Section 3.30, Subd. 10, Unmetered Water Supply, Pawluk asked what this
section referred to. Oliver explained that if you have a well and are discharging into the
Environmental Commission Minutes
June 26, 2006
Page 9 of 10
sewer that is prohibited. There are some wells within the City; however, the County
keeps the records.
Oliver advised that the next step for the code revision is to take all discussion into
consideration, the Environmental Commission comments as well as the City Council
comments. Staff is hoping this will be on the July Council/Manager meeting for
additional discussion. The City Council will make some recommendations on moving
forward. Pawluk asked to have a revised version emailed to the Commission after the
Council makes their recommendations.
Kaisershot asked if this revision of the Municipal Utilities Code was something the City
Council said they want the Environmental Commission to review and how things land on
the Environmental Commission's agenda as far as reviewing some ordinances and not
others. Clancy explained that two or three months ago she met with the Mayor and City
Manager to discuss 1/1 issues. Staff then took the entire 1/1 program to the Council and
explained all the issues needing input from the Environmental Commission for this as
well as the Comprehensive Plan, which is budgeted for 2007.
Sunnyridge Lane Soil Contaminants — Staff is waiting to hear from Hennepin County
Environmental Services regarding the funding.
Three Rivers Park District Trail (Regional Bicycle Plan) — Staff received plans for the
first phase of the trail on June 23; staff is in the process of reviewing these. The trail will
be built this fall from TH 169 to Douglas Drive.
Ad Hoc Deer Task Force — The public participation meeting will be held on July 13 at
Brookview Community Center. There is a website that has a comment area in it, and it
is also being advertised in the SunPost. Once comments are in the Task Force will meet
again in August to discuss and move forward with a recommendation for the Council.
Lighting Plan/Ordinance — Lundstrom advised that a meeting is scheduled for July 24 at
6 pm with the Planning and Environmental Commissions to review the draft ordinance.
Property Maintenance Code — The Inspections department staff had three open houses.
A total of 75 households attended. Of those who attended, most were in favor of moving
forward with the Property Maintenance Code.
Proposed Developments — Oliver stated the City has 4-5 smaller lot splits that are in
various phases of approval. As far as large-scale development, already approved is the
next phase of Rudy Luther Toyota that will be starting soon. Staff is getting closer to
approving the development at Xenia Avenue North and Golden Hills Drive. Nothing is
immediately pending, but staff continues to follow the progress.
Hill asked if the lighting ordinance would be in place for the Rudy Luther Toyota
Phase 2 of the development. Oliver advised this development was a two-phase
approval and both were already approved.
Environmental Commission Minutes
June 26, 2006
Page 10 of 10
Open Space & Recreation Commission Minutes — These are attached to the agenda for
your information.
VII. Commission Member Council Reports
Baker mentioned there would be a meeting of the Planning Commission and the
Council to discuss the possibility of setting up a task force to look at changes to
ordinances to deal with the rapid redevelopment that the City is experiencing.
VIII. Other Business
A. July Agenda Items
• Joint meeting with the Open Space & Recreation and Environmental
Commission on July 24 at 6 pm, followed by the regular meeting of the
Environmental Commission at 7 pm.
• Results of the trash receptacle inventory and data collection.
• Review possible City Council revisions to the Municipal Utilities Code.
B. The Environmental Commission would like to publicly acknowledge, recognize
and thank Tracy Pharr for her service to the Environmental Commission.
MOVED by Pawluk, seconded by Hill, and the motion carried unanimously to publicly
acknowledge, recognize and thank Tracy Pharr for her service to the Environmental
Commission.
IX. Adjourn
MOVED by Baker, seconded by Kaisershot, and the motion carried to adjourn.
The next scheduled meeting will be on June 26, 2006 at 7:00 pm. The meeting was
adjourned at 9:22 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
y
Debra K. Somers
Administrative Assistant
Department of Public Works
"Golden galley
Date: July 20, 2006
To: Environmental Commission
Public Works
763.593.8030 / 763.593.3988 (fax)
From: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Subject: Environmental Commission's Recommendation to Install Additional Trash
Receptacles at the Entrances to Nature Areas
At the July 11, 2006 Council/Manager meeting, the City Council discussed the Parks
Maintenance Budget. Given the desire to limit budget increases, the request to
increase the number of trash receptacles in the nature areas was not approved.
If you have questions, I will be in attendance at the August 28 Environmental
Commission meeting.
GAEnvironmental Com miss ion\Correspondence\Memos\2006\AddFrashReceptaclesDenied.doc
Nature Area Trash Receptacle Inventory
General Mills Research
Boone Avenue entrance - 1/4 full
Duluth Street entrance - 1/4 full
Mary Hills
Bonnie Lane entrance - 1/4 full
Medley Bridge
Receptacle at bridge entrance was removed this year for drainage construction
Pennsylvania Woods
In 300 -feet from Rhode Island entrance - 1/4 full
Rice Lake
At bridge off Bassett Creek Drive - 1/4 full
Schaper Park
At bridge to wood chip trail - 1/4 full
St. Croix Park/Trail
Entrance to trail from park (also acts as park receptacle) - 1/3 full
Notes
➢ All receptacles on map are in place for Medley.
➢ All receptacles were checked and emptied weekly for two weeks, and averaged 1/4
full (55 -gallon receptacle)
➢ Dog waste bags were the majority of the contents along with some litter.
GAPark Maintenance\Miscellaneous\NatureAreeTrashRecepinventory.doc
Community Parke
Brookview FI7i►tne1ka &. Brookvinv Pkivy
Strandc/MacKrell an-iilies
Gearty 3101 Regeni
Retired Volunteers
Hampshire Olympia &. l.oulslana
Kirsch Family
Lakeview Olympia & Hillsboro
Gresser Family
Lions llarokl &. Glenwood
Jan Motari
Medley breign & 23rd Ave
Golden Valley Federated
Women's Club
Schaper Hwy 55 &. Ouawa
Golden Valley Police Reserves
Scheid Puluih & ?'oledo
Cub Scout Pack 350
Wesley (north) H'esley Ur & Orkla
Moore/Gasparini Families
Wesley (south) Plv►nourh Ave &. Orkla
Jack Stratton
Neighborhood Parks
Glenview Zenith & A4an0r Df-
Elephant
rElephant Park Book Group
Golden Oaks i1olders & Plynioutlt
PEND MG
Natchez 201 Natchez
Hanscom & Dritsas Families
North Tyrol 4300 Sunsel Ridge
Osborne Family
Seeman 1101 Florida Ave
Northwest Suburban Optimist Club
South Tyrol 1501 Kalrern In
Robby McCabe & Family
St. Croix 5350 Sr. Croix elve
Covenant Village
Stockman Adell &. Uz or
Thompson Family
Sweeney Lake
Hidden Lakes Association
Wildw6ad Duluth e4r Pe.►iNsylunnia
Robertson Family
Yosemite 3s1 Yaxemire
Eric Johnston (BSM)
Special Use Facilities
Brookview Golf Course
200 Brookview Parkway
Honeywell Little League Area
Louisiana &. Sandburg Rd
Nature Area9
Bassett Creek (north of Duluth)
AVAILABLE
Bassett Creek Guth of Dulurh)
2130 Zane Ave
Covenant Village
Bassett Creek (west of Wisconsin)
PENDING
Driarwood 2300 Unity
Girl Scout "troops 2316 & 1670
General Mills Headquarters
Nature Preserve
GMI Grounds Crew
General Mills Research
Nature Area
The Gannon
Laurel Ave (castorFlorldo)
Laurel &..lersq
AVAILABLE
Laurel Ave (west of Florida to Jcrscy)
Hearthstone of Minnesota
Laurel Ave
(west of Jersey to Pennsylvania)
Jerry & Joan Monson
Maty Hills Golden Valley ltd &. Bonnie Ln
John & Pam Goranson
& Barb Osborne
Pennsylvania Woods
23rd & Rhode Nand
PENDING
Rice Lake 4120 Bassen Creelt Dr
Dawidoff Family
Western Ave l{resrern & Wometka
Ilo cot. Peggy Leppik;
wv
OWN
11 !�Nil
r
Golden Valley
Date: August 28, 2006
To: Environmental Commission
Public Works
763.593.8030 / 763.593.3988 (fax)
From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Subject: Revised City Code, Chapter 3, Municipal and Public Utilities
At its June 24, 2006 meeting, the Environmental Commission reviewed draft revisions to
Chapter 3, Municipal and Public Utilities, of the Golden Valley City Code. The proposed
changes are in response to a pending sanitary sewer surcharge to the City from the
Metropolitan Council for peak sanitary sewer flows above the maximum permitted for
Golden Valley. The excess peak flows are a result of inflow and infiltration of clear water
into the sanitary sewer system.
Following the June 24 review, the proposed code revision and the Commission's
recommended modifications were reviewed by the City Council at the Council/Manager
meeting on July 11, 2006. The following is a summary of the modifications the City
Council directed staff to make in Chapter 3 based upon input from the Environmental
Commission and staff. A draft copy of the portions of Chapter 3 that will be considered
by the City Council in September is attached to this memorandum for reference.
Issue: Should a provision be made to include a sump pump inspection at the time
of final meter reading to prevent new owners from being responsible for previous
owners' actions?
Council Direction: The City Council directed staff to include a section in
the ordinance to establish a "Point of Sale" inspection program. This
revision has been included as Section 3.31 Certificate of Sewer
Regulation Compliance, which requires an inspection and compliance with
Chapter 3 provisions regarding sanitary sewer prior to placing a property
on the market or transferring the title of a property.
GAPROJECTS\Inflow and Infiltration\Code Revision\EC Memo 082306.doc
Issue: Should the proposed surcharge amounts of $500 per month for residential
property and $1, 000 per month for non-residential property be lowered?
Council Direction: The surcharge amounts contained in the first draft of
Chapter 3 should be retained.
Issue: Should the proposed retroactive surcharge for secondary non-compliance
(after first inspection and correction) be included?
Council Direction: The Council directed staff to revise the ordinance to
eliminate the retroactive surcharge provisions, and to double the
surcharge amounts for all violations beyond the first. Therefore, if a
property is subject to the $500 per month surcharge for non-compliance,
corrects the non-compliance, and is found to be non-compliant in a future
inspection, the surcharge amount would be $1,000 per month.
CHAPTER 3
MUNICIPAL AND PUBLIC UTILITIES - RULES AND
REGULATIONS, RATES, CHARGES AND COLLECTIONS
SECTION 3.01. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Chapter, the following words and
terms shall have the meanings stated:
1. "Consumer' and "Customer' mean any user of a utility.
2. "Draintile" means a subsurface drainage and conveyance system of clear
water and groundwater into the storm sewer system.
3. "Interceptor Sewer' means that portion of the sanitary sewer system that
extends outside of the City of Golden Valley and is owned, operated and maintained by
the Metropolitan Council.
4. "Inspector' means any person duly authorized by the City, including the
Building Official or representatives of the Department of Public Works, or companies
under contract with the City to inspect connections to and enforce regulations relating to
the public sanitary sewer, storm sewer or water distribution systems.
5. "Joint Water Commission (JWC)" means the commission established
through a joint powers agreement between the cities of Golden Valley, Crystal and New
Hope to provide potable water to customers in the three cities.
6. "Minneapolis Water Works (MWW)" means a municipal water system
owned and operated by the City of Minneapolis.
7. "Municipal Utility" means any City -owned utility system, including, but not
limited to water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer service.
8. "Owner" means the person or entity that owns or holds the title of a
property served by a municipal utility.
9. "Sanitary Sewer System" includes all street lateral, main and intersecting
sewers and structures by which sewage or industrial wastes are collected, transported,
treated and disposed of; provided that this shall not include plumbing inside or a part of a
building or premises served, or service sewers from a building to the sanitary sewer main.
10. "Service" means providing a particular utility to a customer or consumer.
11. "Sewage" means water -carried waste products from residences, public
buildings, institutions or other buildings or premises, including the excrement or other
discharge from the bodies of human beings or animals.
26
12. "Sewer Service Lateral" or "Service Lateral" means that portion of the
sanitary sewer system that generally is perpendicular to the sewer main and extends from
the sewer main to the structure being served.
13. "Sewer Main" means that portion of the sanitary sewer system that is
owned, operated and maintained by the City. The City portion of the sanitary sewer
system is typically within street rights-of-way or easements.
14. "Storm Sewer" means a subsurface drainage facility that conveys storm
water runoff and snow melt runoff into surface water bodies.
15. "Trunk Water Main" means water mains larger than 12 inches in
diameter that distribute water throughout the distribution system and are owned by the
JWC and maintained by the City.
16. "Utility" means all utility services, whether public, City -owned facilities, or
furnished by public utility companies.
17. "Water Main" means that portion of the potable water distribution system
that is 12 inches in diameter and smaller, and is owned, operated and maintained by the
City.
18. "Water Service" means that portion of the potable water system that is
generally perpendicular to the water main that extends from the water main to the
structure or group of structures being served.
SECTION 3.02. FIXING RATES AND CHARGES FOR MUNICIPAL UTILITIES. All
rates and charges for municipal utilities, including, but not limited to, rates for service,
permit fees, deposits, surcharges, fines, connection and meter testing fees, disconnection
fees, reconnection fees including penalties for non-payment if any, shall be fixed, by the
Council and adopted by ordinance.
SECTION 3.03. CONTRACTUAL CONTENTS. Provisions of this Chapter relating
to municipal utilities shall constitute portions of the contract between the City and all
consumers of municipal utility services, and every such consumer shall be deemed to
assent to the same.
27
SECTION 3.04. RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO MUNICIPAL
UTILITIES.
Subdivision 1. Billing, Payment and Delinquency. Each customer shall be
billed regularly for all municipal utilities. All utility charges shall be delinquent if they are
unpaid at the close of business on the due date shown on the bill. If the due date shown
on the bill falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, the time shall be extended to the
close of business on the next succeeding day on which business is normally transacted. A
uniform grace period may be set by the City Council in the annual fee ordinance. A penalty
shall be added to, and become part of, all delinquent utility bills. If service is suspended
due to delinquency it shall not be restored at that location until a reconnection charge has
been paid for each utility reconnected in addition to amounts owed for service and
penalties.
Subdivision 2. Application, Connection and Sale of Service. Application
for municipal utility services shall be made upon forms supplied by the City, and strictly in
accordance therewith. No connection shall be made until the appropriate permits have
been received from the City. All municipal utilities shall be sold and delivered to
consumers at the current rates established by the City. Applications shall be granted, and
permits issued, only to licensed master plumbers who have provided evidence of liability
insurance, including products liability coverage, with limits consistent with current City
limits or statutory requirements, whichever is greater.
Subdivision 3. Discontinuance of Service. All municipal utilities may be
shut off or discontinued whenever it is found that:
A. The owner or occupant of the premises served, or any person working on
any connection with the municipal utility systems, has violated any requirement of this
Chapter of the City Code, or,
B. Any charge for a municipal utility service, or any other financial obligation
imposed on the present owner or occupant of the premises served, is unpaid after due
notice thereof, or,
C. There is fraud or misrepresentation by the owner or occupant in
connection with any application for service or delivery or charges for these services, or,
D. The owner, occupant or tenant of a premise served has denied entry for
the purpose of repairing water meters or inspecting sump pumps, drains or other facilities.
E. The structure receiving service becomes uninhabitable for any reason.
Subdivision 4. Ownership of Municipal Utilities. Ownership of all
municipal utilities, plants, lines, mains, extensions and appurtenances, shall be and
remain in the City or jointly with other municipal corporations or public bodies, and no
28
person shall own any part or portion thereof, except for sewer service laterals, water
services and draintile service stubs referenced in this Chapter.
Subdivision 5. Right of Entry. By applying for, or receiving, a municipal
utility service, a customer irrevocably consents and agrees that any Inspector. may enter
into and upon the private property of the customer, including dwellings and other buildings,
at all reasonable times under the circumstances for the purpose of inspecting, repairing,
reading, and exchanging meters or connecting or disconnecting a municipal utility service.
Subdivision 6. Meter Test. Whenever a consumer requests that the City
test any utility meter they are currently using, the request shall be accompanied by a cash
deposit, in an amount to be fixed by the Council and adopted by ordinance, for each meter
to be tested. If the meter is found to be inaccurate the meter shall be replaced with an
accurate meter and the deposit refunded. If the meter is found to be accurate in its
recordings or calculations it shall be reinstalled and the deposit shall be retained by the
City to defray the cost of the testing.
Subdivision 7. Unlawful Acts.
A. It is unlawful for any person to break, damage, deface, disturb, or
in any way interfere with any building, attachment, machinery, apparatus, equipment,
fixture, or appurtenance of any municipal utility or municipal utility system, or commit any
act tending to obstruct or impair the use of any municipal utility.
B. It is unlawful for any person to make any connection with, opening
into, use, or alter in any way any municipal utility system without first having applied for
and received a permit to do so from the City.
C. It is unlawful for any person to turn on or connect a utility when the
utility has been turned off or disconnected by the City for non-payment of a bill, or for any
other reason, without first having obtained a permit to do so from the City.
D. It is unlawful for any person to tamper or circumvent, by any means
or device a municipal utility meter, or to knowingly use or consume unmetered utilities or
use the services of any utility system, the use of which the proper billing authorities have
no knowledge.
Subdivision 8. Municipal Utility Services and Charges a Lien.
A. Payment for all municipal utility services and charges shall be the
primary responsibility of the owner of the premises served and shall be billed to the owner
unless otherwise contracted for and authorized in writing by the owner and the tenant, as
agent for the owner, and consented to by the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota. The City
may collect all charges, penalties and surcharges in a civil action or as otherwise provided
in this Subdivision.
29
B. Each utility account is hereby made a lien upon the premises
served. All such accounts which are more than forty-five days past due may, when
authorized by resolution of the Council, be certified by the City Clerk of the City of Golden
Valley, Minnesota, to the County Auditor, and the City Clerk in so certifying shall specify
the amount thereof, the description of the premises served, and the name of the owner
thereof. The amount so certified shall be extended by the Auditor on the tax rolls against
such premises in the same manner as other taxes, and collected by the County Treasurer,
and paid to the City along with other taxes.
(Sections 3.05 through 3.19, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.)
(Sections 3.21 through 3.29, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.)
SECTION 3.30. RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE. The following apply only to sanitary sewer service.
Subdivision 1. Metered Water Not Discharged. If a portion of the water
furnished to any premises is consumed and not directly or indirectly discharged into the
sanitary sewer system, the consumer may request a separate water meter for the portion
of the water consumed and not discharged in the sanitary sewer. There shall be no
sanitary sewer charges associated with the water meter account for water consumed but
not discharged to the sanitary sewer system
Subdivision 2. Deleterious Substances. Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services standards shall control disposal of types of substances
discharged.
Subdivision 3. Unlawful Discharge. Except as otherwise expressly
authorized in this subdivision, no water from any roof surface, sump pump, footing tile or
drains, swimming pool, any other natural precipitation or groundwater, cooling water or
industrial process shall be discharged into the sanitary sewer system. Dwellings, buildings
and structures with sump pumps or footing tiles or drains shall have a permanently
installed discharge line which shall not at any time discharge water into the sanitary sewer
system, except as provided herein. A permanent installation shall be one which provides
for year-round discharge capability to either the outside of the dwelling, building or
structure, or is connected to a city storm sewer or draintile. It shall consist of a rigid
discharge line without valving or quick connections for altering the path of discharge or a
system otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works.
A. Any person, firm or corporation having a roof surface, groundwater sump
pump, footing tile or drain, swimming pool, cooling water or unpolluted industrial process
water now connected and/or discharging into the sanitary sewer system shall disconnect
or remove the same. Any disconnects or openings in the sanitary sewer system shall be
closed or repaired in an effective, workmanlike manner with the proper permits and
inspected by a representative of the City. If a city draintile or storm sewer system is
available to the property, connection of said discharges to these systems shall be
mandatory.
30
B. Any property owner or consumer applying for a plumbing permit
(excluding permits for water heaters), variance, minor subdivision or other action from the
City shall agree to an inspection of the structure's sump pump, footing or foundation drain
discharge for compliance with this code. Requested actions shall not be forwarded to City
boards or commissions or the City Council for review until the discharges are in full
compliance with this section of City Code.
C. Every person owning improved real estate that discharges into the City's
sanitary sewer system shall allow the City or a designated representative of the City to
inspect the buildings to confirm there is no sump pump or other prohibited discharge into
the sanitary sewer system.
D. All new structures with sumps for which a building permit is issued shall
have a pump and shall be piped to the outside of the dwelling, and connected to a city
draintile or storm sewer system, if available, before a certificate of occupancy is issued.
E. Any property with a sump pump found not in compliance with this Code
but subsequently verified as compliant shall be subject to an annual re -inspection to
confirm continued compliance. If that property is found not to be in compliance upon re-
inspection, or any person refusing to allow their property to be re -inspected within 30 days
after receipt of mailed written notice from the City, that property shall be subject to a
nonrefundable surcharge of $500 per month, to be imposed on every sewer bill. All
properties found during any re -inspection to have violated this section shall be subject to
nonrefundable monthly surcharge that is double the previously charged surcharge. The
nonrefundable surcharge for all properties which are not single family residential (or
owners thereof) shall be $1,000 per month.
Subdivision 4. Winter Discharge. The Director of Public Works is
authorized to allow a property owner to discharge clear water into the sanitary sewer
system. Prior to issuance of the permit the Director of Public Works must verify one of the
criteria to issue the permit has been satisfied. The fee for this permit shall be in an amount
to be fixed by the Council and adopted by ordinance. The permit shall authorize such
discharge only from November 15 to March 15, shall require the owner to permit an
inspection of the property on March 16 or as soon thereafter as possible to determine that
discharge into the sanitary sewer has been discontinued and shall subject the owner to a
$500 monthly non-refundable surcharge in the event the owner refuses an inspection or
has failed to discontinue the discharge into the sanitary sewer. The non-refundable charge
will commence with the April water billing and continue until the property owner
establishes compliance with this section. A property owner is required to meet at least one
of the following criteria in order to obtain a permit:
A. The freezing of the discharge from the sump pump, footing or foundation
drain is causing a dangerous condition, such as ice buildup or flooding, on either public or
private property.
31
B. The property owner has demonstrated that there is a danger that the
sump pump, footing or foundation drain pipes will freeze up and result in either failure or
damage to the sump pump unit or the footing or foundation drain and cause basement
flooding.
C. The water being discharged from the sump pump, footing or foundation
drain cannot be readily discharged into a city draintile or storm sewer system or other
acceptable drainage system. Following ten (10) days written notice and an opportunity to
be heard, the Director of Public Works may require the owners of the property to
discharge their sump pump or footing or foundation drain into the sanitary sewer from
November 15 to March 15 if the discharge is causing an icy condition on streets.
Subdivision 5. Separate Connections. A separate sewer service
connection shall be provided for each building, except where one building stands at the
rear of another on an interior lot and no such separate connection is available. Provided,
that more than one service may be connected to the sewer system through one
connection where a manhole is provided and the City has specifically approved the
arrangement.
Subdivision 6. Materials. Where any pipe or other material is found in
repairing a sewer service which does not then meet the requirements of the State Building
Code or current City standards and specifications, the non -conforming pipe or material
shall be removed and replaced at the expense of the consumer.
Subdivision 7. Elevation. Wherever possible, the sewer service shall be
brought to the building to be served at an elevation below the floor of the lowest level in
the building. No such service shall be laid parallel to or within three feet of any bearing
wall. The depth shall be sufficient to afford protection from frost. To the extent possible,
the sewer service shall be laid at uniform grade and in straight alignment. If the service is
too low to afford gravity flow, an appropriate device shall be installed for lifting sewage to
the service.
Subdivision 8. Connections. Wherever possible, the sewer service shall be
connected to the wye provided or the stub at the lot line. If such connection cannot be
used, the main may be tapped upon the approval of the City and at the expense of the
owner. All connections must be constructed in accordance with the current City standards,
be appropriately permitted, and be inspected by the City.
Subdivision 9. Ownership of Sewer Service Lateral. The property owner
shall own and be responsible for the maintenance of the sanitary sewer service lateral
between the sanitary sewer main within the street, including the connection point, and the
building being served.
Subdivision 10. Unmetered Water Supply. The discharge of sewage into
the sewer system from water sources other than the City's water supply is prohibited
without a permit from the City and shall include metering of the water supply or discharge.
The metered supply or discharge must use meters purchased from the City.
32
Subdivision 11. Additional Rules and Regulations. The Council may, by
resolution, adopt such additional rules and regulations relating to placement, size and type
of equipment as it, in its discretion, deems necessary or desirable. Copies of such
additional rules and regulations shall be kept on file in the office of the Director of Public
Works, and uniformly enforced.
Section 3.31. Certificate of Sewer Regulations Compliance.
Subdivision 1. Required. No person shall sell, advertise for sale, give or transact
a change in title or property ownership of real property with or without one or more
buildings or structures, without first obtaining a certificate of sewer regulations compliance
from the city.
Subdivision 2. Application; fees.
(A) The owner or owner's representative is required to make application for a certificate
of sewer regulations compliance before any property is offered for sale, gifted or
transferred, and before the owner or owner's representative enters into any contract
for deed or other transaction changing the party responsible for the property.
(B)At the time of application, the applicant for a certificate of sewer regulations
compliance must pay the application fee appropriate for the type of property the
request is for. Such fees shall be set from time to time by the city.
Subdivision 3. Inspection. The applicant for a certificate of sewer regulations
compliance is responsible for requesting an inspection of the property after making
application and payment of fees. An inspection shall be made by the city to determine
whether the property use is in accordance with city sanitary sewer service regulations, as
provided in section 3.30 of this chapter. The entire property and all buildings on the
property shall be made available for inspection.
Subdivision 4. Compliance; expiration.
(A) Upon inspection, when the property use is in accordance with city sanitary sewer
services regulations, a certificate of sewer regulations compliance will be issued by
the city.
(B) A Certificate of sewer regulations compliance is valid to be used for the transfer of
property for a period of one year from the date of issue. The certificate of sewer
regulations compliance may only be used for property transfer by the owner named
on the certificate or the owner's legal representative.
(C)The certificate of sewer regulations compliance must be conspicuously displayed
on the premises at all times when the property is being shown for sale and the
owner is responsible for informing any potential buyers, gift recipients or other
persons to whom he intends to transfer title as to his receipt of the certificate of
sewer regulations compliance.
If, within one year of the issue of a certificate of sewer regulations compliance, the
owner named on the certificate of sewer regulations compliance does not agree to an
inspection, as required by section 3.30, subdivision 3(B) of this chapter, the certificate
33
is immediately void. Such inspections trigger the administrative sanctions found in
section 3.30, subdivision 3 of this chapter.
Subdivision 6. Temporary certificate of sewer regulations compliance. Upon
inspection, a temporary certificate of sewer regulations compliance may be issued by the
city permitting the transfer of property, providing;
(A) An agreement by the buyer, seller or other responsible person has been executed
with the city, whereby the buyer, seller or other responsible person agrees to
complete corrections to the property necessary to bring it within compliance of the
city sanitary sewer service regulations, section 3.30 of this chapter within thirty (30)
days of the transfer of property.
(B) A security to ensure completion of any corrections to the property must be posted
with the lender in the form of an escrow, or with the city when a lending institution is
not involved with the transaction. The security shall be in an amount at least equal
to twice the retail value of the work necessary for compliance with this article. The
escrow must be fully maintained until a certificate of sewer regulations compliance
is issued. In no case will a temporary certificate of sewer regulations compliance be
issued for more than One Hundred and Eighty (180) days following the first
inspection of the property.
Subdivision 7. Sanctions. At all times during the certification process, the owner is
responsible for any sanctions or surcharges under section 3.30, subdivision 4 of this
chapter.
Subdivision 8. Repeated Inspection. Upon inspection, when the property use is not
legal in accordance with city sanitary sewer service regulations, the owner shall be entitled
to a second inspection to be scheduled within thirty (30) days of the original inspection. If,
at this inspection, the city inspector determines that all violations of city sanitary sewers
regulations have been corrected, the city shall immediately issue a certificate of sewer
regulations compliance.
(Sections 3.32 through 3.98, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.)
SECTION 3.99. VIOLATION A MISDEMEANOR. Every person violates a section,
subdivision, paragraph or provision of this Chapter when such person performs an act
thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, or fails to act when such failure is thereby
prohibited or declared unlawful, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as for a
misdemeanor except as otherwise stated in specific provisions hereof.
34
CHAPTER 3
MUNICIPAL AND PUBLIC UTILITIES - RULES AND
REGULATIONS, RATES, CHARGES AND COLLECTIONS
SECTION 3.01. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Chapter, the following words and
terms shall have the meanings stated -
4 1. "Consumer" and "Customer" mean any user of a utility.
2. "Draintile" means a subsurface drainage and conveyance system of clear
water and groundwater into the storm sewer system.
3. "Interceptor Sewer" means that portion of the sanitary sewer system that
extends outside of the City of Golden Valley and is owned, operated and maintained by
the Metropolitan Council.
4. "Inspector" means any person duly authorized by the City, including the
Building Official or representatives of the Department of Public Works, or companies
under contract with the City to inspect connections to and enforce regulations relating to
the public sanitary sewer, storm sewer or water distribution systems.
5. "Joint Water Commission (JWC)" means the commission established
through a joint powers agreement between the cities of Golden Valley, Crystal and New
Hope to provide potable water to customers in the three cities.
6. "Minneapolis Water Works (MWW)" means a municipal water system
owned and operated by the City of Minneapolis.
7. "Municipal Utility" means any City -owned utility system, including, but not
limited to water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer service.
8. "Owner" means the person or entity that owns or holds the title of a
property served by a municipal utility.
9. "Sanitary Sewer System" includes all street lateral, main and intersecting
sewers and structures by which sewage or industrial wastes are collected, transported,
treated and disposed of; provided that this shall not include plumbing inside or a part of a
building or premises served, or service sewers from a building to the sanitary sewer main.
10. "Service" means providing a particular utility to a customer or consumer.
11. "Sewage" means water -carried waste products from residences, public
buildings, institutions or other buildings or premises, including the excrement or other
discharge from the bodies of human beings or animals.
26
12. "Sewer Service Lateral" or "Service Lateral" means that portion of the
sanitary sewer system that generally is perpendicular to the sewer main and extends from
the sewer main to the structure being served.
13. "Sewer Main" means that portion of the sanitary sewer system that is
owned, operated and maintained by the City. The City portion of the sanitary sewer
system is typically within street rights-of-way or easements.
14. "Storm Sewer" means a subsurface drainage facility that conveys storm
water runoff and snow melt runoff into surface water bodies.
15. "Trunk Water Main" means water mains larger than 12 inches in
diameter that distribute water throughout the distribution system and are owned by the
JWC and maintained by the City.
16. "Utility" means all utility services, whether public, City -owned facilities, or
furnished by public utility companies.
17. "Water Main" means that portion of the potable water distribution system
that is 12 inches in diameter and smaller, and is owned, operated and maintained by the
City.
18. "Water Service" means that portion of the potable water system that is
generally perpendicular to the water main that extends from the water main to the
structure or group of structures being served.
SECTION 3.02. FIXING RATES AND CHARGES FOR MUNICIPAL UTILITIES. All
rates and charges for municipal utilities, including, but not limited to, rates for service,
permit fees, deposits, surcharges, fines, connection and meter testing fees, disconnection
fees, reconnection fees including penalties for non-payment if any, shall be fixed, by the
Council and adopted by ordinance.
SECTION 3.03. CONTRACTUAL CONTENTS. Provisions of this Chapter relating
to municipal utilities shall constitute portions of the contract between the City and all
consumers of municipal utility services, and every such consumer shall be deemed to
assent to the same.
27
SECTION 3.04. RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO MUNICIPAL
UTILITIES.
Subdivision 1. Billing, Payment and Delinquency. Each customer shall be
billed regularly for all municipal utilities. All utility charges shall be delinquent if they are
unpaid at the close of business on the due date shown on the bill. iflf the due date shown
on the bill falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, the time shall be extended to the
close of business on the next succeeding day on which business is normally transacted. A
uniform grace period may be set by the City Council in the annual fee ordinance. A penalty
shall be added to, and become part of, all delinquent utility bills. If service is suspended
due to delinquency it shall not be restored at that location until a reconnection charge has
been paid for each utility reconnected in addition to amounts owed for service and
penalties.
Subdivision 2. Application, Connection and Sale of Service. Application
for municipal utility services shall be made upon forms supplied by the City, and strictly in
accordance therewith. No connection shall be made until the appropriate permits have
been received from the City. All municipal utilities shall be sold and delivered to
consumers at the current rates established by the City. Applications shall be granted, and
permits issued, only to licensed master plumbers who have provided evidence of liability
insurance, including products liability coverage, with limits consistent with current City
limits or statutory requirements, whichever is greater.
Subdivision 3. Discontinuance of Service. All municipal utilities may be
shut off or discontinued whenever it is found that:
A. The owner or occupant of the premises served, or any person working on
any connection with the municipal utility systems, has violated any requirement of this
Chapter of the City Code, or,
B. Any charge for a municipal utility service, or any other financial obligation
imposed on the present owner or occupant of the premises served, is unpaid after due
notice thereof, or,
C. There is fraud or misrepresentation by the owner or occupant in
connection with any application for service or delivery or charges for these services, or,
D. The owner, occupant or tenant of a premise served has denied entry for
the purpose of repairing water meters or inspecting sump pumps, drains or other facilities.
E. The structure receiving service becomes uninhabitable for any reason.
Subdivision 4. Ownership of Municipal Utilities. Ownership of all
municipal utilities, plants, lines, mains, extensions and appurtenances, shall be and
remain in the City or jointly with other municipal corporations or public bodies, and no
person shall own any part or portion thereof, except for sewer service laterals, water
28
services and draintile service stubs as ent Red OR ' this erdinaRGe referenced in this
Chapter.
Subdivision 5. Right of Entry. By applying for, or receiving, a municipal
utility service, a customer irrevocably consents and agrees that any Inspector. may enter
into and upon the private property of the customer, including dwellings and other buildings,
at all reasonable times under the circumstances for the purpose of inspecting, repairing,
reading, and exchanging meters; or connecting or disconnecting a municipal utility service.
Subdivision 6. Meter Test. Whenever a consumer requests that the City
test any utility meter they are currently using, the request shall be accompanied by a cash
deposit, in an amount to be fixed by the Council and adopted by ordinance, for each meter
to be tested. If the meter is found to be inaccurate the meter shall be replaced with an
accurate meter and the deposit refunded. If the meter is found to be accurate in its
recordings or calculations it shall be reinstalled and the deposit shall be retained by the
City to defray the cost of the testing.
Subdivision 7. Unlawful Acts.
A. It is unlawful for any person to break, damage, deface, disturb, or
in any way interfere with any building, attachment, machinery, apparatus, equipment,
fixture, or appurtenance of any municipal utility or municipal utility system, or commit any
act tending to obstruct or impair the use of any municipal utility.
B. It is unlawful for any person to make any connection with, opening
into, use, or alter in any way any municipal utility system without first having applied for
and received a permit to do so from the City.
C. It is unlawful for any person to turn on or connect a utility when the
utility has been turned off or disconnected by the City for non-payment of a bill, or for any
other reason, without first having obtained a permit to do so from the City.
D. It is unlawful for any person to tamper or circumvent, by any means
or device a municipal utility meter, or to knowingly use or consume unmetered utilities or
use the services of any utility system, the use of which the proper billing authorities have
no knowledge.
Subdivision 8. Municipal Utility Services and Charges a Lien.
A. Payment for all municipal utility services and charges shall be the
primary responsibility of the owner of the premises served and shall be billed to the owner
unless otherwise contracted for and authorized in writing by the owner and the tenant, as
agent for the owner, and consented to by the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota. The City
may collect all charges, penalties and surcharges in a civil action or, O^ the alto m ativo aR d
at the GPtiOR of the , as otherwise provided in this Subdivision.
29
B. Each utility account is hereby made a lien upon the premises
served. All such accounts which are more than forty-five days past due may, when
authorized by resolution of the Council, be certified by the City Clerk of the City of Golden
Valley, Minnesota, to the County Auditor, and the City Clerk in so certifying shall specify
the amount thereof, the description of the premises served, and the name of the owner
thereof. The amount so certified shall be extended by the Auditor on the tax rolls against
such premises in the same manner as other taxes, and collected by the County Treasurer,
and paid to the City along with other taxes.
(Sections 3.05 through 3.19, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.)
(Sections 3.21 through 3.29, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.)
SECTION 3.30. RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE. The following apply only to sanitary sewer service.
Subdivision 1. Metered Water Not Discharged. If a portion of the water
furnished to any premises is consumed and not directly or indirectly discharged into the
sanitary sewer system, the consumer may request a separate water meter for the portion
of the water consumed and not discharged in the sanitary sewer. There shall be no
sanitary sewer charges associated with the water meter account for water consumed but
not discharged to the sanitary sewer system
Subdivision 2. Deleterious Substances. Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services standards shall control disposal of types of substances
discharged.
Subdivision 3. Unlawful Discharge. Except as otherwise expressly
authorized in this subdivision, no water from any roof surface, sump pump, footing tile or
drains, swimming pool, any other natural precipitation or groundwater, cooling water or
industrial process shall be discharged into the sanitary sewer system. Dwellings, buildings
and structures with sump pumps or footing tiles or drains shall have a permanently
installed discharge line which shall not at any time discharge water into the sanitary sewer
system, except as provided herein. A permanent installation shall be one which provides
for year-round discharge capability to either the outside of the dwelling, building or
structure, or is connected to a city storm sewer or draintile. It shall consist of a rigid
discharge line without valving or quick connections for altering the path of discharge or a
system otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works.
A. Any person, firm or corporation having a roof surface, groundwater sump
pump, footing tile or drain, swimming pool, cooling water or unpolluted industrial process
water now connected and/or discharging into the sanitary sewer system shall disconnect
or remove the same. Any disconnects or openings in the sanitary sewer system shall be
closed or repaired in an effective, workmanlike manner with the proper permits and
inspected by a representative of the City. If a city draintile or storm sewer system is
available to the property, connection of said discharges to these systems shall be
mandatory.
30
B. Any property owner or consumer applying for a bu+I plumbing permit
(excluding permits for water heaters), variance, minor subdivision or other action from the
City shall agree to an inspection of the StrUGtUresstructure's sump pump, footing or
foundation drain discharge for compliance with this code. Requested actions shall not be
forwarded to City boards or commissions or the City Council for review until the discharges
are in full compliance with this section of City Code.
C. Every person owning improved real estate that discharges into the City's
sanitary sewer system shall allow the City or a designated representative of the City to
inspect the buildings to confirm there is no sump pump or other prohibited discharge into
the sanitary sewer system.
D. All new structures with sumps for which a building permit is issued shall
have a pump and shall be piped to the outside of the dwelling, and connected to a city
draintile or storm sewer system, if available, before a certificate of occupancy is issued.
E. Any property with a sump pump found not in compliance with this Code
but subsequently verified as compliant shall be subject to an annual re -inspection to
confirm continued compliance. If that property is found not to be in compliance upon re-
inspection, or any person refusing to allow their property to be re -inspected within 30 days
after receipt of mailed written notice from the City, that property shall be subject to a
nonrefundable surcharge of $500 per month, to be imposed on every sewer bill. All
properties found during any re -inspection to have violated this section shall be subject to
nonrefundable monthly surcharge that is double the previously charged surcharge. The
nonrefundable surcharge for all properties which are not single family residential (or
owners thereof) shall be $1,000 per month.
Subdivision 4. Winter Discharge. The Director of Public Works is
authorized to allow a property owner to discharge clear water into the sanitary sewer
system. Prior to issuance of the permit the Director of Public Works must verify one of the
criteria to issue the permit has been satisfied. The fee for this permit shall be in an amount
to be fixed by the Council and adopted by ordinance. The permit shall authorize such
discharge only from November 15 to March 15, shall require the owner to permit an
inspection of the property on March 16 or as soon thereafter as possible to determine that
discharge into the sanitary sewer has been discontinued and shall subject the owner to
t#ea $500 monthly non-refundable surcharge in the event the owner refuses an inspection
or has failed to discontinue the discharge into the sanitary sewer. The non-refundable
charge will commence with the April water billing and continue until the property owner
establishes compliance with this section. A property owner is required to meet at least one
of the following criteria in order to obtain a permit:
A. The freezing of the discharge from the sump pump, footing or foundation
drain is causing a dangerous condition, such as ice buildup or flooding, on either public or
private property.
31
B. The property owner has demonstrated that there is a danger that the
sump pump, footing or foundation drain pipes will freeze up and result in either failure or
damage to the sump pump unit or the footing or foundation drain and cause basement
flooding.
C. The water being discharged from the sump pump, footing or foundation
drain cannot be readily discharged into a city draintile or storm sewer system or other
acceptable drainage system. Following ten (10) days written notice and an opportunity to
be heard, the Director of Public Works may require the owners of the property to
discharge their sump pump or footing or foundation drain into the sanitary sewer from
November 15 to March 15 if the discharge is causing an icy condition on streets.
Subdivision 5. Separate Connections. A separate sewer service
connection shall be provided for each building, except where one building stands at the
rear of another on an interior lot and no such separate connection is available. Provided,
that more than one service may be connected to the sewer system through one
connection where a manhole is provided and the City has specifically approved the
arrangement.
Subdivision 6. Materials. Where any pipe or other material is found in
repairing a sewer service which does not then meet the requirements of the State Building
Code or current City standards and specifications, the non -conforming pipe or material
shall be removed and replaced at the expense of the consumer.
Subdivision 7. Elevation. Wherever possible, the sewer service shall be
brought to the building to be served at an elevation below the floor of the lowest level in
the building. No such service shall be laid parallel to or within three feet of any bearing
wall. The depth shall be sufficient to afford protection from frost. To the extent possible,
the sewer service shall be laid at uniform grade and in straight alignment. If the service is
too low to afford gravity flow, an appropriate device shall be installed for lifting sewage to
the service.
Subdivision 8. Connections. Wherever possible, the sewerservice shall be
connected to the wye provided or the stub at the lot line. If such connection cannot be
used, the main may be tapped upon the approval of the City and at the expense of the
owner. All connections must be constructed in accordance with the current City standards,
be appropriately permitted, and be inspected by the City.
Subdivision 9. Ownership of Sewer Service Lateral. The property owner
shall own and be responsible for the maintenance of the sanitary sewer service lateral
between the sanitary sewer main within the street, including the connection point, and the
building being served.
Subdivision 10. Unmetered Water Supply. The discharge of sewage into
the sewer system from water sources other than the City's water supply is prohibited
without a permit from the City and shall include metering of the water supply or discharge.
The metered supply or discharge must use meters purchased from the City.
32
Subdivision 11. Additional Rules and Regulations. The Council may, by
resolution, adopt such additional rules and regulations relating to placement, size and type
of equipment as it, in its discretion, deems necessary or desirable. Copies of such
additional rules and regulations shall be kept on file in the office of the Director of Public
Works, and uniformly enforced.
Section 3.31. Certificate of Sewer Regulations Compliance.
Subdivision 1. Required. No person shall sell, advertise fersatefor sale, give or
transact a change in title or property ownership of real property with or without one or
more buildings or structures, without first obtaining a certificate of sewer regulations
compliance from the city.
Subdivision 2. Application; fees.
(A) The owner or owner's representative is required to make application for a certificate
of sewer regulations compliance before any property is offered for sale, gifted or
transferred, and before the owner or owner's representative enters into any contract
for deed or other transaction changing the party responsible for the property.
(B)At the time of application, the applicant for a certificate of sewer regulations
compliance must pay the application fee appropriate for the type of property the
request is for. Such fees shall be set from time to time by the city.
Subdivision 3. Inspection. The applicant for a certificate of sewer regulations
compliance is responsible for requesting an inspection of the property after making
application and payment of fees. An inspection shall be made by the city to determine
whether the property use is4ega4 in accordance with city sanitary sewer service
regulations, as provided in section 3.30 of this chapter. The entire property and all
buildings on the property shall be made available for inspection.
Subdivision 4. Compliance; expiration.
(A) Upon inspection, when the property use is4ega4 in accordance with city sanitary
sewer services regulations, a certificate of sewer regulations compliance will be
issued by the city.
(B) A Certificate of sewer regulations compliance is valid to be used for the transfer of
property for a period of one year from the date of issue. The certificate of sewer
regulations compliance may only be used for property transfer by the owner named
on the certificate or the owner's legal representative.
(C)The certificate of sewer regulations compliance must be conspicuously displayed
on the premises at all times when the property is being shown for sale and the
owner is responsible for informing any potential buyers, gift recipients or other
persons to whom he intends to transfer title as to his receipt of the certificate of
sewer regulations compliance.
If, within one year of the issue of a certificate of sewer regulations compliance, the
owner named on the certificate of sewer regulations compliance does not agree to an
inspection, as required by section 3.30, subdivision 3-.43(B) of this chapter, the
33
certificate is immediately void. Such inspections trigger the administrative sanctions
found in section 3.30, subdivision 3-:43 of this chapter.
Subdivision 6. Temporary certificate of sewer regulations compliance. Upon
inspection, a temporary certificate of sewer regulations compliance may be issued by the
city permitting the transfer of property, providing;
(A) An agreement by the buyer, seller or other responsible person has been executed
with the city, whereby the buyer, seller or other responsible person agrees to
complete corrections to the property necessary to bring it within compliance of the
city sanitary sewer service regulations, section 3.30 of this chapter within thirty (30)
days of the transfer of property.
(B) A security to ensure completion of any corrections to the property must be posted
with the lender in the form of an escrow, or with the city when a lending institution is
not involved with the transaction. The security shall be in an amount at least equal
to twice the retail value of the work necessary for compliance with this article. The
escrow must be fully maintained until a certificate of sewer regulations compliance
is issued. In no case will a temporary certificate of sewer regulations compliance be
issued pFier tefor more than One Hundred and Eighty (180) days following the first
inspection of the property.
Subdivision 7. Sanctions. At all times during the certification process, the owner is
responsible for any fres or sanctions or surcharges under section 3.30, subdivision 4 of
this chapter.
Subdivision 8. Repeated Inspection. Upon inspection, when the property use is not
legal in accordance with city sanitary sewer service regulations, the owner shall be entitled
to a second inspection to be scheduled within thirty (30) days of the original inspection. If,
at this inspection, the city inspector determines that all violations of city sanitary sewers
regulations have been corrected, the city shall immediately issue a certificate of sewer
eat+eregulations compliance.
(Sections 3.32 through 3.98, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.)
SECTION 3.99. VIOLATION A MISDEMEANOR. Every person violates a section,
subdivision, paragraph or provision of this Chapter when such person performs an act
thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, or fails to act when such failure is thereby
prohibited or declared unlawful, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as for a
misdemeanor except as otherwise stated in specific provisions hereof.
34
Document comparison done by DeltaView on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 3:25:41 PM
Input:
Document 1 Powerpocs://DOCS/463620/2
Document 2 Powerpocs://DOCS/463620/3
Rendering set standard
Legend:
125 ORMS
I ON ON -74 .
Format change
? 4c��c deletiei=
Inserted cell
Deleted cell
Moved cell
Split/Mer ed cell
Padding cell
Statistics:
Count
Insertions
14
Deletions
16
Moved from
0
Moved to
0
Style chane
0
Format changed
0
Total changes
30
1/1 Comprehensive Communications Plan
1. Focus Areas
• Problems caused by cross -connected sump pumps
• Problems with aging City -owned sanitary sewer facilities and with an aging and at -capacity interceptor
system
• Changes in laws regarding the building code, the environment, etc
• Impact on Golden Valley (costs, surcharges, demand charges, effects on future redevelopment)
• Need for public education about cross -connections and related issues
• Responsibilities of property owner, City, and Met Council
• Responsibility to the environment
2. Mission
The City of Golden Valley must reduce its 1/1 into the sanitary sewer system to comply with Metropolitan
Council requirements, minimize and eliminate the surcharge, and remain friendly to the environment. To
accomplish this, the City must raise public awareness about 1/1 and related issues, and generate public support
for and compliance with the City's program to reduce 1/1.
3. Goals and Objectives
• Help public understand 1/1 and related issues and how they impact the community and the region.
• Explain sanitary sewer system in general and the aging and capacity issues with the City and Met Council
system in particular, and problems caused by cross -connected sump pumps
• Educate public about City's efforts to reduce 1/1.
• Build public support for City's 1/1 reduction efforts.
• Explain individual property owners' responsibility for helping reduce 1/1.
• Build public support for individual property owner responsibility for helping reduce 1/1.
• Encourage property owners to participate in and comply with 1/1 inspection program.
• Educate public about City's efforts to be responsible stewards of the environment.
• Encourage citizens to consider and act upon their responsibility to the environment.
• Educate real estate professionals about financial impact to community.
4. Potential Strategies (1 = high priority, 2 = medium priority, 3 = low priority)
• Educational video that provides overview of problem and solution (for use on cable TV, neighborhood
meetings, etc)
• Short video PSAs for cable TV and Web site to encourage action
• Include questions on City survey (Fall 2006) to determine level of public awareness, anticipated
cooperation level, etc)
• Web site material
• Informational flyers, handouts, brochures
• Neighborhood information meetings
• City newsletter articles
• Press releases to SunPost and Cable 12
• Increase awareness at Pavement Management information meetings
• Share case studies of 1/1 problems in other parts of the US
• Use "Leak Ericson" as a mascot and symbol for 1/1 program
• Work with MCES to develop ads for metro -wide TV
• Work with other Cities to share resources
Communications Pian
4.1
Strengths
4.2 Challenges
•
Legitimate issue
7. Real estate professionals
Population's lack of knowledge about problem
•
Knowledgeable staff
Desire to buy way out of problem
•
We're building a plan
Population's lack of knowledge about system and how it
•
Established City information outlets (publication,
works
cable TV, web)
Costs to property
•
Community paper and community TV
Lack of funding
•
Engaged community
Blamestorming
•
High level of City service
Distrust of government
•
Success of meter change -out program
Working with other Cities (New Hope, Robbinsdale, Mpls)
•
Success of pavement management education
•
5. Audience Identification
1. Golden Valley residents (homeowners)
5. City Council and Commissioners
2. Businesses (building owners and managers)
6. School -aged kids
3. Apartment Owners
7. Real estate professionals
4. City staff
8. Inspectors (private and public)
6. Key Messages
• Cross -connected sump pumps are illegal and harm homeowners, neighborhoods, and the entire
community.
• Illegal sump connections dump clear water into the sanitary sewer system, which sends it to the waste
water treatment plant. Treating this clear water is unnecessary and increases your sewer charges.
• Cross -connected sump pumps add water to a sanitary sewer system that wasn't designed to handle it.
Overflows can cause sewer back-ups in people's basements—maybe even your own.
• Properly connected sump pumps discharge to the lawn or the storm sewer system, not to a drain or
sanitary sewer pipe in the house.
• During the rainy season (March through October), cross -connected sump pumps increase the flow of clear
water through Golden Valley's sanitary sewer system two -fold.
• Cross -connected sump pumps aren't the only 1/1 culprits—roof and foundation drains also contribute to the
problem.
• If Golden Valley doesn't get its 1/1 under control, its utility customers will pay $380,000 to $500,000 (or
more, depending on actual 1/1 levels) per year in additional sewer charges starting in 2008.
• You can help reduce 1/1 in Golden Valley by making sure your sump pump is discharging properly to your
lawn or the storm sewer system.
The City of Golden Valley's 1/1 inspection program will help citizens determine if their sumps are properly
connected. This is a long-term process.
0 1/1 causes serious problems for the metro -wide sanitary sewer system.
7. Potential Resources
• MCES
• Consultant community
• Other cities (local and national)
• Environmental agencies (EPA, MPCA)
8. Communication Vehicles and Strategies for Target Audiences
1. Golden Valley residents (homeowners)
City newsletter and Web site articles
•
Press releases to SunPost and Cable 12
•
City survey (Fall 2006) questions
•
Neighborhood information meetings
•
Informational flyers, handouts, brochures
•
Educational video
•
Increase awareness at Pavement Management
information meetings
•
Use "Leak Ericson" as a mascot and symbol
•
Short video PSAs for cable TV and Web
•
Remodeling Fair
2. Businesses (building owners and
Press releases to SunPost and Cable 12
managers)
0
One-on-one meetings
•
Direct mailings if informational flyers, handouts,
brochures
•
Educational video
•
Increase awareness at Pavement Management
information meetings
•
Short video PSAs for cable TV and Web
3. Apartment Owners
0
Press releases to SunPost and Cable 12
•
Neighborhood information meetings
•
Existing programs for multifamily code compliance
(Star Program)
•
Informational flyers, handouts, brochures
•
Educational video
•
Use "Leak Ericson" as a mascot and symbol
•
Short video PSAs for cable TV and Web
4. City staff
0
Neighborhood information meetings
•
Educational video
•
Case studies of 1/1 problems in other parts of the US
5. City Council and Commissioners
0
City newsletter and Web site articles
•
Informational flyers, handouts, brochures
•
Educational video
•
Case studies of 1/1 problems in other parts of the US
6. School -aged kids
0
Neighborhood information meetings
•
Informational flyers, handouts, brochure
•
Educational video
•
Use "Leak Ericson" as a mascot and symbol
0
Short video PSAs for cable TV and Web
7. Real estate professionals/Title companies
• Informational flyers, handouts, brochures
• Educational video
• Use "Leak Ericson" as a mascot and symbol
• Short video PSAs for cable TV and Web
• Workshops
8. Inspectors (private and public)
• Informational flyers, handouts, brochures
• Educational video
• Case studies of 1/1 problems in other parts of the US
9. Evaluation Techniques
• Monitor reductions in peak flow
• Measure number of requests to inspect sump pumps
• Track number of cross -connections found and corrected
• Eliminate Met Council demand charge by 2011
10. Updating the Communications Plan
Staff should regularly review and update the communications plan as needed.
Gunmunicabons Plan
Timeline/Calendar
Notes for 2006
June 2006
•
Environmental Commission reviews draft ordinance
July
2006
•
Cit News article
•
City Council reviews draft ordinance
•
Conduct MCES interceptor manhole survey
•
Initiate closed circuit television inspection of 1/1 Area 10
August
2006
•
Environmental Commission reviews draft ordinance
•
Mail Met Council the surcharge credit verification letter
•
Continue closed circuit television inspection of 1/1 Area 10
•
Develop inspection program brochure
•
Write newsletter article
.
Write script for inspection program video
September
2006
•
City Council considers final ordinance first and second considerations
•
Strate izequestions for citywide survey
•
Begin storm water compliance inspection program in 2007 PMP area
October 2006
November 2006
•
Citywide survey
December 2006
Begin storm water compliance inspection program in 2007 PMP area
LO
Wo
z
Q
CD
—i
Ji
Ji 70
L==
U) m
Q' —j
Ji :_-
0
U