07-05-23 City Council Agenda July 5, 2023 — 6:30 PM
Council Chambers
Hybrid Meeting
1.Call to Order
1A.Pledge of Allegiance and Land Acknowledgement
1B.Roll Call
1C.Proclamation Recognizing July as Parks and Recreation Month
2.Additions and Corrections to Agenda
3.Consent Agenda
Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by
the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items
unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general
order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
3A.Approval of City Council Minutes:
3A.1.Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 20, 2023
3B.Approval of City Check Registers
3C.Boards, Commissions, and Task Forces:
3C.1.Receive the Open Space and Recreation Commission (OSRC) 2022 Annual Report and
Approve the 2023 Work Plan
3D.Bids, Quotes, and Contracts:
3D.1.Approve Agreement with Bituminous Roadways, Inc. for the 2023 Scheid Park Tennis and
Hybrid Pickleball Court Reconstruction Project
3D.2.Approve Agreement for Yosemite Park Play Structure Replacement and Shade Structure
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
City Council meetings are being conducted in a hybrid format with in-person and remote options for
attending, participating, and commenting. The public can make statements in this meeting during
public comment sections, including the public forum beginning at 6:20 pm.
Remote Attendance/Comment Options:
Members of the public may attend this meeting by watching on cable channel 16, streaming on
CCXmedia.org, streaming via Webex, or by calling 1-415-655-0001 and entering access code 2463 155
5683 and webinar password 1234. Members of the public wishing to address the Council remotely
have two options:
Via web stream - Stream via Webex and use the ‘raise hand’ feature during public comment
sections.
Via phone - Call 1-415-655-0001 and enter meeting code 2463 155 5683 and webinar password
1234. Press *3 to raise your hand during public comment sections.
City of Golden Valley City Council Regular Meeting July 5, 2023 — 6:30 PM
1
Addition with Minnesota-Wisconsin Playground Inc.
3D.3.Authorize Agreement for DeCola Ponds SEA School-Wildwood Park Restoration Project #23-
14 with Landbridge Ecological
3D.4.Authorize Agreement for Referendum Communications & Consulting Services with Rapp
Strategies, Inc.
3E.Adopt Resolutions 23-058, 23-059, and 23-060 Approving Transfer of Home Ownership
Program for Equity (HOPE) Properties to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
3F.Adopt Resolution No. 23-061 - Reimbursement Agreement for the Remote Fire Station
3G.Adopt Resolution No. 23-062 Approving Amendment to Compensation and Classification
Tables
4.Public Hearing
4A.Adopt Ordinance No. 765 Approving Zoning Map Amendment for 208 Meander Road
4B.Public Hearing for HOPE Property at 4707 Circle Down - Ordinance No. 766 and Resolution
No. 23-063 - Zoning, Land Use, and Preliminary Plan for Subdivision
4C.Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat for Minor Subdivision and Subdivision Variance - 5317
Glenwood Ave
4D.Adopt Ordinance No. 767 Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 175 to Allow for a Drive-
thru Facility at 8240 Golden Valley Drive
5.Old Business
6.New Business
6A.Review of Council Calendar
6B.Mayor and Council Communications
1. Other Committee/Meeting updates
7.Adjournment
City of Golden Valley City Council Regular Meeting July 5, 2023 — 6:30 PM
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Parks & Recreation
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
1C. Proclamation Recognizing July as Parks and Recreation Month
Prepared By
Sheila VanSloun, Parks & Recreation Administrative Assistant
John Stutzman, Recreation Supervisor
Summary
National Parks and Recreation month is July 1–July 31, 2023. The month celebrates the vital role parks
and recreation plays in bringing people together, providing essential services, and enhancing the
quality of life through recreation programming, events, leisure activities, community amenities, and
conservation efforts. Additionally, it is a time to recognize the vital contributions made by community
volunteers who generously provide countless hours of support and commitment advocating for green
space, keeping our parks clean, and supporting activities for youth.
Financial or Budget Considerations
Not applicable
Legal Considerations
Not required
Equity Considerations
Providing unbiased programs, services and facilities through infrastructure that supports and advances
diversity, equity, and inclusion in all Golden Valley parks.
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt a Proclamation Recognizing July as Parks and Recreation Month.
Supporting Documents
Proclamation Recognizing July as Parks and Recreation Month
3
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING PARKS & RECREATION MONTH
JULY 1 - 31, 2023
WHEREAS, parks and recreation is an integral part of communities throughout this
country, including the City of Golden Valley; and
WHEREAS parks and recreation promotes health and wellness, improving the physical
and mental health of people who live near parks; and
WHEREAS parks and recreation promotes time spent outdoors and in nature, which
positively impacts mental health by increasing cognitive performance and well-being, and
alleviating illnesses such as depression, attention deficit disorders, and Alzheimers; and
WHEREAS parks and recreation encourages physical activities by providing space for
athletics, trails, playgrounds, golf courses, community gardens, and many other activities
designed to promote active lifestyles; and
WHEREAS park and recreation programming and education activities, such as summer
programming, youth sports, environmental education, and creative arts, are critical to childhood
development; and
WHEREAS parks and recreation increases a community’s economic prosperity through
increased property values, expansion of the local tax base, increased tourism, and crime
reduction; and
WHEREAS our parks and open spaces ensure the ecological beauty of our community
and provide a place for children and adults to connect with nature and recreate outdoors; and
WHEREAS the U.S. House of Representatives has designated July as Parks and
Recreation Month; and
WHEREAS the City of Golden Valley recognizes the benefits derived from parks and
recreation resources.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Golden Valley do hereby proclaim July 2023 as Parks and Recreation month in the City
of Golden Valley. We call upon all citizens and civic organizations to pay tribute to the
value parks and recreation brings to our community, and to recognize the substantial
4
contributions Parks & Recreation professionals make to our health, quality of life, active
lifestyles, socialization, and the building of community.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the
City of Golden Valley to be affixed on this 5th day of July, 2023.
___________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
5
June 20, 2023 —6:30 PM
Council Chambers
Hybrid Meeting
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
City Council meetings are being conducted in a hybrid format with in-person and remote options
for attending, participating, and commenting. The public can make statements in this meeting
during public comment sections, including the public forum beginning at 6:20 pm.
1.Call to Order
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:50 pm.
1A. Pledge of Allegiance and Land Acknowledgement
Mayor Harris led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance and read the City’s Land
Acknowledgement statement.
1B. Roll Call
Present:Mayor Shep Harris, Council Members Sophia Ginis, Maurice Harris, Denise La Mere-
Anderson, and Gillian Rosenquist
Staff present: City Manager Cruikshank, Community Development Director Flores, Housing and
Economic Development Manager Shoquist, Planning Manager Zimmerman,
Assistant City Engineer Kakach, Finance Director Virnig, and City Clerk Schyma
1C. Receive Award for the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
Finance Director Virnig introduced Joel Merry, State Representative for the Minnesota
Government Finance Officers Association and Assistant Finance Director from Minnetonka, who
presented the award to the City of Golden Valley for their 2021 Financial Report.
Mayor Harris thanked Finance Department staff for their important and thorough work in
budgeting and financial reporting.
2.Additions and Corrections to Agenda
Motion by Rosenquist, Second by Ginis to approve the agenda as submitted.
Motion carried 5-0.
3.Consent Agenda
Approval of Consent Agenda -All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine
by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these
items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the
general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
6
Motion by Rosenquist, Second by La Mere-Anderson to approve the Consent Agenda as revised:
removal of Items #3D.1. Adopt Resolution No. 23-045 Accepting Donations for the 2023 Bike
Rodeo Outreach Event and Promotional Items from the Golden Valley Crime Prevention Fund;
#3D.2.Adopt Resolution No. 23-046 Accepting a Donation for the 2023 Summer Concert Series at
Brookview Park from the Golden Valley Federated Women’s Club; and #3D.3. Adopt Resolution
No. 23-047 Accepting a Donation for a Park Bench to be Located at Brookview Park Honoring
Heather Reichmalmberg.
Motion carried 5-0.
3A.Approval of City Council Minutes:
3A.1. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 6, 2023
3B.Approval of City Check Registers
3C.Bids, Quotes, and Contracts:
3C.1.Approve Contract for Scheid Park Shelter Roof Replacement with KRJ Incorporated
3C.2.Approve Contract for Traffic Signal Maintenance with Traffic Control Corporation
3C.3.Approve Contract with Intereum for Audio and Video Improvement for the City Hall
Council Conference Room
3C.4.Approve Purchase from AIM Electronics for the Electric Sign Board Replacement for
City Hall
3D.Grants and Donations:
3D.1.Adopt Resolution No. 23-045 Accepting Donations for the 2023 Bike Rodeo Outreach
Event and Promotional Items from the Golden Valley Crime Prevention Fund
3D.2.Adopt Resolution No. 23-046 Accepting a Donation for the 2023 Summer Concert Series
at Brookview Park from the Golden Valley Federated Women’s Club
3D.3.Adopt Resolution No. 23-047 Accepting a Donation for a Park Bench to be Located
at Brookview Park Honoring Heather Reichmalmberg
3E.Adopt Resolution No. 23-048 Assigning 2022 Fund Balance to Remote Fire Station
3F.Adopt Resolution No. 23-057 Approving Modification to PTO/Vacation Maximum
Accrual Cap for Sworn Peace Officers
3.Items Removed From the Consent Agenda:
3D.1. Adopt Resolution No. 23-045 Accepting Donations for the 2023 Bike Rodeo Outreach Event
and Promotional Items from the Golden Valley Crime Prevention Fund
Council Member Harris thanked the Golden Valley Crime Prevention Fund for their generous
donation.
Mayor Harris announced the Public Safety Open House on June 21 and thanked public safety staff
and the Crime Prevention Fund for their hard work on this fun community event.
Motion by M. Harris, Second by Rosenquist to adopt Resolution No. 23-045 accepting the
donations from the Golden Valley Crime Prevention Fund for the 2023 Bike Rodeo outreach event
and promotional items.
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
7
3D.2. Adopt Resolution No. 23-046 Accepting a Donation for the 2023 Summer Concert Series at
Brookview Park from the Golden Valley Federated Women’s Club
Council Member Harris thanked the Golden Valley Federated Women’s Club for their donation
and continued support of community events in Golden Valley.
Motion by M. Harris, Second by Ginis to adopt Resolution No. 23-046 accepting a donation from
the Golden Valley Federated Women's Club for the 2023 Summer Concert Series at Brookview
Park.
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
3D.3. Adopt Resolution No. 23-047 Accepting a Donation for a Park Bench to be Located at
Brookview Park Honoring Heather Reichmalmberg
Council Member Harris thanked the Goldenberg family for the addition of a park bench honoring
Heather Reichmalmberg to be located at Brookview Park. He further commended all donors
whose contributions help make parks in Golden Valley more inclusive and accessible.
Motion by M. Harris, Second by La Mere-Anderson to Resolution No. 23-047 accepting the
donation from the Goldenberg family for the addition of a park bench at Brookview Park honoring
Heather Reichmalmberg.
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
4.Public Hearing
4A.Adopt Resolution No. 23-049 Approving a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax
Increment Financing District within Valley Square Redevelopment Project Area
Housing and Economic Development Manager Shoquist discussed the staff report including the
project site, phased plan of development, and Mixed Income Housing Policy. She noted that
Municipal Advisor Tom Denaway of Baker Tilly, Attorney Ron Batty of Kennedy & Graven, and
Developer Brian Woolsey were in attendance to answer any questions the HRA may have.
Mr. Denaway provided information on tax increment financing (TIF) including financial analysis,
Renewal & Renovation TIF District eligibility, limitation on use of TIF revenue in Renewal &
Renovation District, Renewal & Renovation TIF District duration, TIF revenue projections and
proposed TIF assistance budget.
Mayor Harris opened the public hearing.
Cathy Waldhauser, 3220 Orchard Avenue, stated her support for the project and the creation of a
TIF District. She asked staff for clarification on a few points regarding TIF, affordable housing, and
the development.
Ruth Paradise, 8515 Duluth Street, stated her support for the project and the creation of a TIF
District to provide affordable housing in Golden Valley. She believes using TIF for this project is
necessary and is beneficial for the City and for the developer.8
Mayor Harris closed the public hearing.
Housing and Economic Development Manager Shoquist discussed the typical timelines for bringing
affordable housing developments to completion. She stated that the ultimate goal is to improve
the diversity of affordable housing stock including additional developments that have a higher
ratio of units with multiple bedrooms.
Council Member Ginis stated her support for affordable housing opportunities and stated that
while this particular project will not provide many units with multiple bedrooms, she hopes that
this project is a starting point for more diversity in housing stock and options for individuals and
families that want to live in Golden Valley.
Mayor Harris and Council Member La Mere-Anderson agreed with Council Member Ginis and
added that this project helps the City make a huge leap forward on the Council’s commitment to
affordable housing.
Council Member Rosenquist further agreed with the comments of Council. She added that there is
currently an affordable housing crisis so to be able to move quickly on this project is important
even though it won’t check every box on the City’s wish-list.
The Council thanked staff for being aggressive and making affordable housing options a possibility
in Golden Valley.
Housing and Economic Development Manager Shoquist stated that per Minnesota Statutes, the
Council is required to consider certain findings regarding TIF.
The Council consensus was to adopt the following TIF findings as part of Resolution No. 23-049:
The TIF expenditures are necessary and desirable for the sound and orderly development
of the Redevelopment Project Area and of the community as a whole, and for the
protection and preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare;
The proposed redevelopment would not occur but for the use of tax increment financing;
The TIF District qualifies as a renovation and renewal district;
The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole; and
The objectives of encouraging development and redevelopment within the Valley Square
Redevelopment Project Area will be advanced by adoption of the TIF Plan.
Motion by M. Harris, Second by La Mere-Anderson to adopt Resolution No. 23-049 Approving a
Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District within Valley Square
Redevelopment Project Area.
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
4B.Approve Vacation of Easements for Sentinel Development (640 Golden Valley LLC)
1. Vacation of Easement Platted Drainage and Utility Easement Golden Valley State
Bank Addition (Lot 1, Block 1), Resolution No. 23-050
2. Vacation of Easement Golden Valley Road (Maren Lane), Resolution No. 23-051
3. Vacation of Easement Golden Valley Road (Vermont Avenue), Resolution No. 23-052
9
4. Platted Drainage and Utility Easement Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley Drive, and
Wisconsin Ave N (Lots 1&2, Block 2), Resolution No. 23-053
5. Deeded Sanitary Sewer Easement Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley Drive, and
Wisconsin Ave N (Lot 2, Block 2), Resolution No. 23-054
6. Vacation of Golden Valley Drive Right of Way, Resolution No. 23-055
Assistant City Engineer Kakach discussed the staff report, the need for the vacation of each
easement, and the six separate public hearings that are required for the process.
Mayor Harris opened the public hearing for the vacation of platted drainage and utility easement
Golden Valley State Bank Addition (Lot 1, Block 1). As there were no comments, the public hearing
was closed.
Mayor Harris opened the public hearing for the vacation of easement Golden Valley Road (Maren
Lane). As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Harris opened the public hearing for the vacation of easement Golden Valley Road
(Vermont Avenue). As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Harris opened the public hearing for the platted drainage and utility easement Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley Drive, and Wisconsin Ave N (Lots 1&2, Block 2). As there were no
comments, the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Harris opened the public hearing for the deeded sanitary sewer easement Golden Valley
Road, Golden Valley Drive, and Wisconsin Ave N (Lot 2, Block 2). As there were no comments, the
public hearing was closed.
Mayor Harris opened the public hearing for the vacation of Golden Valley Drive right of way. As
there were no comments, the public hearing was closed.
1.Motion by La Mere-Anderson, Second by M. Harris to adopt Resolution No. 23-050 Vacating
Platted Drainage and Utility Easement Golden Valley State Bank Addition (Lot 1, Block 1).
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
2.Motion by M. Harris, Second by Rosenquist to adopt Resolution No. 23-051 Vacating Golden
Valley Road (Maren Lane) Easement.
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
3.Motion by Rosenquist, Second by M. Harris to adopt Resolution No. 23-052 Vacating Golden
Valley Road (Vermont Avenue) Easement.
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
4.Motion by Ginis, Second by La Mere-Anderson to adopt Resolution No. 23-053 Vacating
Platted Drainage and Utility Easement Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley Drive, and Wisconsin 10
Ave N (Lots 1&2, Block 2).
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
5.Motion by M. Harris, Second by Rosenquist to adopt Resolution No. 23-054 Vacating Deeded
Sanitary Sewer Easement Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley Drive, and Wisconsin Ave N (Lot
2, Block 2).
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
6.Motion by Ginis, Second by Rosenquist to adopt Resolution No. 23-055 Vacating Golden
Valley Drive Right of Way.
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
5.Old Business
6.New Business
6A.Adopt Resolution No. 23-056 Approving Final Plat for Sentinel GV
Planning Manager Zimmerman briefly discussed the staff report, timeline of the project, and
details of the final plat.
Motion by M. Harris, Second by Rosenquist to adopt Resolution 23-056, Approval of Final Plat for
Sentinel GV.
Motion carried 5-0 with unanimous approval.(In Favor: S. Harris, Ginis, M. Harris, La Mere-
Anderson, Rosenquist. Opposed: N/A)
6B.Review of Council Calendar
Mayor Harris reviewed upcoming city meetings, events, and holiday closures.
6C.Mayor and Council Communications
1. Other Committee/Meeting updates
7.Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:23 pm.
________________________________
ATTEST: Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
________________________________
Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk 11
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Administrative Services
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
3B. Approval of City Check Registers
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Approval of the check register for various vendor claims again the City of Golden Valley.
Document is located on city website at the following location:
http://weblink.ci.golden-valley.mn.us/WebLink/Browse.aspx?
id=1000913&dbid=0&repo=GoldenValley
The check register(s) for approval:
06-23-23 Check Register
Financial or Budget Considerations
The check register has a general ledger code as to where teach claim is charged. At the end of the
register is a total amount paid by fund.
Legal Considerations
Not Applicable
Equity Considerations
Not Applicable
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
12
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Parks & Recreation
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
3C.1. Receive the Open Space and Recreation Commission (OSRC) 2022 Annual Report and Approve
the 2023 Work Plan
Prepared By
Sheila VanSloun, Parks & Recreation Administrative Assistant
Rick Birno, Parks & Recreation Director
Summary
At the June 13, 2023 City Council work session, OSRC Chair Linden Weiswerda and Parks & Recreation
staff, presented the 2022 OSRC annual report and 2023 work plan.
Financial or Budget Considerations
Not applicable
Legal Considerations
Not required
Equity Considerations
Providing unbiased programs, services and facilities through infrastructure that supports and advances
diversity, equity, and inclusion in all Golden Valley parks.
Recommended Action
Motion to receive the Open Space and Recreation Commission 2022 annual report and approve the
2023 work plan.
Supporting Documents
2023 Work Plan & 2022 OSRC Annual Report
13
2022 ANNUAL REPORT | 2023 WORK PLAN
THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYOPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSION
14
2 City of Golden Valley
PURPOSE, MISSION,
& PRESCRIBED DUTIES
The Open Space and Recreation Commission provides advice and recommendations to
the Council regarding recreational programs, parks, and open space in the community,
including:
• the portion of the Comprehensive Plan relating to open space needs, parks and recre-
ation programs, and trail systems
• policies and plans for parks, recreation programs, use of open space, and trail systems
• assessment of current programs regarding open space, parks and recreation, and trail
systems
• assessment of future needs regarding parks and recreation, open space, and trail sys-
tems
• cooperative agreements, policies with other public and private agencies, youth sports
organizations, groups or individuals relating to recreational programs and facilities
• budget and capital outlay needs for parks and recreation, Brookview Golf Course, and
the park improvement fund
15
OPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSION / 2022 Annual Report 3
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
4 2022 Overview
8 Five-year summary:
2018–2022
COMMISSIONERS
Linden Weiswerda, Chair (May 2024)
Roger Bergman (May 2025)
John Cornelius (May 2025)
Bill Delaney (May 2026)
Matthew Olson (April 2026)
Matthew Sanders (May 2025)
Scott Seys (May 2024)
Dawn Speltz (May 2026)
Brian Wright (May 2024)
Youth – Vacancy
Note: Terms run May 1-April 30
COUNCIL LIAISON
Maurice Harris
CITY STAFF
Rick Birno, Parks & Recreation Director
Sheila Van Sloun, Administrative Assistant
16
4 City of Golden Valley
2022 OVERVIEW
• Worked with staff to review and provide insights
for reestablishing recreation programming, park
usage, and facility rentals due to COVID.
• Reviewed and recommended the 2023–2032
Parks, Brookview, and Golf Course Capital Im-
provement Plans.
• Continued to support and provide guidance to
staff for the growth of enterprise and revenue
funds within the Parks & Recreation Department.
• Reviewed golf course operations and procedures,
including fees, leagues, lessons, rules and regula-
tions, schedule, curling, disc golf, and lawn bowl -
ing.
• Reviewed and provided guidance on the annual
report and work plan presented to the City Coun-
cil.
• Worked with staff and joint powers agreement
partners to provide guidance and support for
proposed Sochacki Park improvements.
• Participated in the annual Joint City Council/Com-
mission meeting.
• Represented the Open Space & Recreation
Commission on the Brookview/City Hall rotational
public art selection committee.
• Continued to meet with youth athletic associa-
tions for program updates and discussions on
present and future facility needs.
• Reviewed seasonal recreation programs, leagues,
classes, and events.
• Supported the continued partnership with Golden
Valley Arts and St Louis Park Friends of the Arts
to offer the Artist Showcase at Brookview. The
successful event was hosted at Brookview the
evening of Jan 14, 2022.
• Reviewed and provided guidance for Brookview
room use, rental fees, and operation guidelines.
• Reviewed the annual nuisance wildlife removal
processes and data. Recommended to staff to
Medley Park Community Garden
17
OPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSION / 2022 Annual Report 5
2022 OVERVIEW
explore an additional option to assist with needed
removals when USDA removal team is not avail -
able due to other priorities.
• Reviewed proposed play structure plans for an
all-accessible playground at Brookview Park in a
partnership with Arc of Minnesota.
• Provided input to Three Rivers Park District staff
for the initial link of the CP Rail Regional Trail.
• Monitored staff updates regarding the progress
of the irrigation replacement project at Brookview
Golf Course as well as any patron concerns
during installation.
• Provided guidance on new park improvements,
including:
• tennis court resurfacing project at Seeman
Park
• new outdoor hockey rink and internal park trail
improvements at Medley Park
• South Tyrol Park update
• tennis court removal and east ballfield update
at Scheid Park
• outdoor LED lighting updates at multiple park
locations
• Community Garden construction at Medley
Park
• Supported the implementation of a mobile sum-
mer program to bring youth opportunities and
resources to underserved areas in Golden Valley,
with the goal to expand in 2023.
• Partnered with staff and the Environmental Com-
mission to finalize plans for the flood water reduc-
tion projects at Wildwood Park and Medley Park.
• Worked with staff on the annual bike and pedes-
trian improvement recommendations.
• Discussed caterer changes at Brookview, park
picnic shelter use issues, park use policies, a
naming/renaming process proposal, park dedica-
tion opportunities, and the winter warming house
staffing plan.
• Reviewed and supported final plans for the new
Community Garden at Medley Park. Partnered
with Golden Valley One Good Deed, H&R Block,
and the Men’s Shed group on the development of
the Community Garden amenities.
• With staff, hosted neighborhood input processes
to update and add new park amenities at Scheid
Park and South Tyrol Park.
• Supported a new partnership with the Golden Val -
ley Garden Club to provide programs and events
with the Parks & Recreation Department.
• All Commissioners participated in the 2022 golf
course tour to view improvements in progress as
well as planned updates in 2023.
Watch Me Go triathlon
18
6 City of Golden Valley
• Review, provide input, and recommend 2024–
2033 Park, Brookview, and Golf Course Capital
Improvement Plans.
• Continue to explore possibilities for additional
parkland, open green space, and the expansion
of park amenities in historically underserved
areas and high-density areas of the city to pro-
mote environmental justice.
• Work with staff to explore opportunities to in-
crease park dedication funding.
• Support and provide guidance to staff for the
growth of enterprise and revenue funds within
the Parks and Recreation Department.
• Continue to evaluate and recommend changes,
enhancements, and additions to community and
neighborhood parks.
• Monitor park shelter accessibility and general
building improvements at Wesley Park, including:
• ADA and access improvements
• bathroom updates
• replacement of flooring, frames/doors/win-
dows, LED lighting, and furnace
• Plan with Three Rivers Park District staff for the
final link of the CP Rail Regional Trail south of Hwy
55 for eventual recommendation of preferred
route.
• Continue to provide guidance working with staff,
MNDOT, and Three Rivers Park District to add a
trail connection from the Schaper Park intersec-
tion on Hwy 55 to Theodore Wirth Parkway.
• Continue to work with staff and joint powers
agreement partners on the development of So-
chacki Park.
• Monitor scheduled improvements at Schied Park
and Yosemite Park.
• Solicit community input regarding amplified music
and alcohol in Golden Valley parks as requested
by the City Council.
• Explore a partnership with the Minneapolis Park
Board for the addition of an off-leash pet exercise
area to be located in the northeast area of Golden
Valley close to Theodore Wirth Park.
• Begin initial discussions and develop a public in-
put process for the proposed park improvements
at Natchez Park scheduled for 2024, including:
• replacing basketball court and adding an ad -
justable hoop system
• neighborhood selection of a new play structure
• updating all internal park trails requiring main-
tenance
• updating youth ballfield
• Work with Three Rivers Park District team on the
design development of the Basset Creek Regional
Trail from Douglas Dr to Theodore Wirth Parkway.
Summer sand volleyball
2022 OVERVIEW
2023 PROPOSED WORK PLAN
19
OPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSION / 2022 Annual Report 7
2022 OVERVIEW
• Work with staff to provide input for proposed
bike and pedestrian improvements scheduled for
2024.
• Continue to work with staff to expand the spon-
sorship program for adopting dog bag stations in
Golden Valley parks.
• Provide guidance to staff to develop strategies
for improving participation and implementing
new programs, events, and opportunities for
underserved populations and communities in
Golden Valley.
• Continue to review recreation, golf, Three One
Six, and Brookview fees, programs, events,
leagues, and facility operations.
• Continue to support the partnerships with St
Louis Park Friends of the Arts and the Golden
Valley Garden Club.
• Review and approve Golden Valley recognized
youth athletic associations providing programs
for the community. Continue work on associa-
tions’ program updates and discussion on future
facility needs.
• Continue to participate in the annual Joint City
Council/Commission meeting, the annual park
system tour, and represent the Open Space &
Recreation Commission on the Brookview/City
Hall rotational public art selection committee.
• Continue working with staff and partnering with
the DEI Commission regarding discussions for
the development of a naming process policy for
Golden Valley community assets to be recom-
mended to the City Council.
• Receive updates and review annual nuisance
wildlife removal program to provide guidance to
staff.
• Continue to support community events, includ-
ing Run the Valley, ice Cream Social, Winterfest,
etc.
• Explore developing two tennis courts at
Brookview Park into six pickleball courts.
• Work with staff and Golden Valley One Good
Deed for the design and implementation of a new
play trail around the loop at Brookview and Lions
Park.
• Support staff to initiate and lead a programming
partnership with northwest municipalities to
expand and grow opportunities for youth with
unique physical and cognitive needs.
• Work with staff on the addition of WIFI in park
shelter buildings.
Winterfest
20
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Parks & Recreation
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
3D.1. Approve Agreement with Bituminous Roadways, Inc. for the 2023 Scheid Park Tennis and Hybrid
Pickleball Court Reconstruction Project
Prepared By
Sheila VanSloun, Parks & Recreation Administrative Assistant
Rick Birno, Parks & Recreation Director
Summary
A request for proposal bids was advertised on April 6, 2023 for court reconstruction at Scheid Park.
Improvements include the replacement of two tennis courts with hybrid Pickleball lines, new court
fencing, fence privacy slats and ADA appropriate access gates. A pre-bid meeting was held onsite on
April 12, 2023 and two bids were submitted on April 26, 2023. Staff is recommending moving forward
with the court construction bid and alternate #2 for the addition of fence privacy slats. Bituminous
Roadways, Inc. was the low bid and is the contractor recommended by staff.
Bid totals are as follows:
• Bituminous Roadways $197,910.00 $39,700.00 (Alt.#1) $4,500.00 (Alt.#2)
• T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. $225,600.00 $40,300.00 (Alt.#1) $4,800.00 (Alt.#2)
Financial or Budget Considerations
$275,000 has been budgeted in the 2023 Golden Valley Parks CIP budget P20 for the tennis court
reconstruction.
Legal Considerations
Agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney and approved to move forward.
Equity Considerations
Providing unbiased programs and services through infrastructure that supports and advances diversity,
equity, and inclusion in all Golden Valley parks.
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute agreement with Bituminous Roadways,
Inc. for the 2023 Scheid Park tennis and hybrid Pickleball court reconstruction project in the amount of
$202,410.00.
Supporting Documents
21
2023 Contract with Bituminous Roadways - Scheid Park
22
FC - 1
AGREEMENT FOR 2023 SCHEID PARK TENNIS COURT PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), entered into the 5th day of July, 2023 between
the City of Golden Valley (the “City”), a municipal corporation, existing under the laws of
the State of Minnesota, and Bituminous Roadways, Inc. a business corporation, under
the laws of Minnesota (“Contractor”).
ARTICLE 1. The Contract Documents. The Contract Documents consist of: this
Agreement, the Proposal and Bid of the Contractor, the Contractor’s Bonds, the General
Conditions, Special Conditions and any supplementary conditions, drawings, plans,
Specifications, addenda issued prior to execution of this Agreement, other documents
listed herein or in any of the foregoing documents, and Modifications of the same issued
after execution of this Agreement (collectively the “Contract” or “Contract Documents”).
A Modification is (1) a written amendment to the Contract signed by both parties, (2) a
Change Order, (3) a Construction Change Directive, or (4) a written order for a minor
change in the Work issued by the Engineer.
In the event of a conflict among the various provisions of the Contract Documents, the
terms shall be interpreted in the following order of priority:
1. Modifications to the Contract
2. This Agreement
3. Special Conditions
4. General Conditions
Drawings shall control over Specifications, and detail in drawings shall control over
large-scale drawings.
All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Agreement, but defined
elsewhere in the Contract Documents, shall have the meaning set forth in the Contract
Documents.
ARTICLE 2. The Work. Contractor, for good and valuable consideration the sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, covenants and agrees to furnish all materials, all
necessary tools and equipment, and to do and perform all work and labor necessary for
the 2023 Scheid Park Tennis Court Project (the “Project”) according to the Plans and
Specifications and all of the Contract Documents.
Contractor shall commence and conclude the Work in accordance with the Contract
Documents. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Accordingly, Contractor shall
complete the Work in accordance with the time schedule for commencement and
completion of the Work set forth in the Contract Documents. Contractor shall complete
the Work in every respect to the satisfaction and approval of the City.
ARTICLE 3. Contract Price. The City shall pay the Contractor the Contract Price in
current funds for the Contractor’s performance of the Contract. The Contract Price shall
23
FC - 2
be $202,410.00, subject to additions and deductions as provided in the Contract
Documents.
Installment payments, if any, on account of the Work shall be made in accordance with
the provisions of the General Conditions. Final payment shall be due and payable on or
before thirty (30) days after issuance of a Certificate of Final Completion issued by the
City Engineer confirming that the Work has been fully completed and Contractor’s
obligations fully performed by Contractor.
ARTICLE 4. Contractor’s Bonds. Contractor shall make, execute and deliver to the
City corporate surety bonds in a form approved by the City, in the sum of $202,410.00
for the use of the City and of all persons furnishing labor, skill, tools, machinery or
materials to the Project. Said bonds shall secure the faithful performance and payment
of the Contract by the Contractor and shall be conditioned as required by law. This
Agreement shall not become effective unless and until said bonds have been received
and approved by the City.
ARTICLE 5. Acceptance of the Work. The City, through its authorized agents, shall
be the sole and final judge of the fitness of the Work and its acceptability.
ARTICLE 6. Records. Contractor shall keep as complete, exact and accurate an
account of the labor and materials used in the execution of the Work as is possible, and
shall submit and make this information available as maybe requested by the City.
ARTICLE 7. Payment. All payments to Contractor shall be made payable to the order
of Bituminous Roadways, Inc., and the City does not assume and shall not have any
responsibility for the allocation of payments or obligations of the Contractor to third
parties.
ARTICLE 8. Cancellation Prior to Execution. The City reserves the right, without
liability, to cancel the award of the Contract at any time before the execution of the
Contract by all parties.
ARTICLE 9. Special Assessment Contingency. The City’s obligation under this
contract is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds, including funds
derived from special assessments, from which payment for contract purposes can be
made. The City shall not be legally liable for any payment under this Agreement unless
the special assessment appeal period under Minn. Stat. § 429.081 has passed and no
appeals have been received.
ARTICLE 10. Termination. The City may by written notice terminate the Contract, or
any portion thereof, when (1) it is deemed in the best public, state or national interest to
do so; (2) the Special Assessment contingency has not been met; (3) the City is unable
to adequately fund payment for the Contract because of changes in state fiscal policy,
regulations or law; or (4) after finding that, for reasons beyond Contractor’s control,
Contractor is prevented from proceeding with or completing the Work within a
reasonable time.
24
FC - 3
In the event that any Work is terminated under the provisions hereof, all completed
items or units of Work will be paid for at Contract Bid Prices. Payment for partially
completed items or units of Work will be made in accordance with the Contract
Documents.
Termination of the Contract or any portion thereof shall not relieve Contractor of
responsibility for the completed Work, nor shall it relieve Contractor’s Sureties of their
obligations for and concerning any just claims arising out of the Work.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, both parties hereto have caused this Contract to be signed
on their respective behalves by their duly authorized offices and their corporate seals to
be hereunto affixed the day and year first above written.
THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
BY
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
BY
Timothy J. Cruikshank, City Manager
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS, INC.
BY
Pam Hague, Secretary
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
SECTION 324000
PLANS
PART 1 GENERAL
1.01 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Tennis Court Plans
2. Finish Elevations
3. Typical Fence Detail
195
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net 262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCTitle PageProject #22-026Sheet #1Date2.16.2023CAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSScheid ParkTennis ComplexVersion5.02023 Tennis CourtReconstructionTennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422
196
NDirection Of NorthTreesx' x"Diameter Of TreesSingle Head LightDouble Head LightQuad Head LightXXX.XX = Existing ElevationsXXX.XX = New/Final ElevationsElevationsEarthAggregate Base / StoneConcreteBinder CourseSurface CourseLow AreasPeeling PaintStructural CracksSilt FenceExcavationFiberglassSafety FenceGrassSurface CracksSaw CutsCJ - Control JointCFP- Center Fence PostCLF - Center Line Of FenceCNP- Center Of Net PostCOF- Center Of FenceCDT- Center Drain TileCTD- Center Tie DownDT- Drain TileEOA - Edge Of AsphaltEOB - Edge Of BaseEOC- Edge Of ConcreteEOP- Edge Of PostFG- Finish GradeFH- Fire HydrantIEOC- Inside Edge Of ConcreteIEOP- Inside Edge Of PostIOC - Inside Of ConcreteIOF- Inside Of Fence LP- Light PoleMHC- Man Hole CoverAggregate Base / Stone Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net 262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCLegendProject #Sheet #2DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion5.022-0262.16.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422
197
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net 262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCDemolition PlanProject #Sheet #3DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion5.0N22-0262.16.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422Ice RinkInstall MN-DOT Silt FenceRemove Topsoil, (Owner To Remove Trees)Excavate To 15" Below Final GradeInstall 180N In Excavated AreaMove Pulverized Material To New Court AreaMove Topsoil To Old Court AreaSawcut WalkRemove Asphalt1234567112777345100.41100.41 = New/Final Elevations100.33100.1299.96100.64100.1799.8099.8015'102.80102.46102.3199.97100.126699.7199.46100.34100.44100.36100.36100.00B.M.7222198
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCNew Site LayoutProject #Sheet #4DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion5.0N22-0262.16.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422 30'15'30'CIce Rink
15'122' EOA - EOA110' EOA - EOA7'Old Court Pulverized 20221199.4699.7199.97102.31123' EOB - EOB111' EOB - EOB199
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLC
StoneProject #Sheet #5DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion5.022-0262.16.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422 15'31'EOB - EOB15' EOB - EOB123' EOB - EOB111' EOB - EOB7'29'-6" Rink To EOBCONTRACTOR OPTION:IF PAVING CONTRACTOR CHOOSES TO INSTALLSET-DOWN PASS, THEN SURFACE COURSE IS TO MATCH JOINT.COLOR CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALLARMOR OVER COLD JOINTELEVATIONS ON A 20' X 20' GRIDSTARTING AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNERFINISH ELEVATION TOLERANCESSURFACE COURSE ASPHALT - ±0.02LOWER LEVEL ASPHALT-0 TO -0.03DENSE GRADED AGGREGATE -0 TO -0.03GENERAL NOTES:1 - CONTRACTOR TO SHOOT ELEVATIONS ON SAME GRID AS ABOVE TOVERIFY STONE IS WITHIN TOLERANCE. BEFORE PAVING BINDER COURSE,SUBMIT TO CONSULTANT.2 - NET POST AND CENTER TIE DOWN FOOTINGS AND SLEEVES ARE TO BEINSTALLED BEFORE PAVING SURFACE COURSEN101.47 101.64 101.81 101.98 102.15 102.32 102.41101.30 101.47 101.64 101.81 101.98 102.15 102.24101.13102.07100.96101.90100.79101.73100.62101.56100.45101.39101.30 101.47 101.64 101.81 101.98101.13 101.30 101.47 101.64 101.81100.96101.13 101.30101.47 101.64100.79 100.96 101.13 101.30 101.47100.62 100.79 100.96 101.13 101.30100.43101.37100.60 100.77 100.94 101.11 101.2899.97100.34100.44B.M.@ 100.00100.47.83% Slope
.83% Slope
.83% Slope.83% Slope200
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCBinderProject #Sheet #6DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion5.022-0262.16.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422 30'122' EOA - EOA110' EOA - EOA30' EOC - EOC15' EOC - EOCELEVATIONS ON A 20' X 20' GRIDSTARTING AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNERFINISH ELEVATION TOLERANCESSURFACE COURSE ASPHALT - ±0.02LOWER LEVEL ASPHALT-0 TO -0.03DENSE GRADED AGGREGATE -0 TO -0.03GENERAL NOTES:1 - CONTRACTOR TO SHOOT ELEVATIONS ONSAME GRID AS ABOVE TO VERIFY BINDER ISWITHIN TOLERANCE. BEFORE PAVING SURFACECOURSE, SUBMIT TO CONSULTANT.2 - NET POST AND CENTER TIE DOWN FOOTINGSAND SLEEVES ARE TO BE INSTALLED BEFOREPAVING SURFACE COURSECONTRACTOR OPTION:IF PAVING CONTRACTOR CHOOSES TO INSTALLSET-DOWN PASS, THEN SURFACE COURSE IS TOMATCH JOINT. COLOR CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALLARMOR OVER COLD JOINTN101.64 101.81 101.98 102.15 102.32102.41101.47 101.64 101.81 101.98 102.15102.24102.07101.90101.73101.56101.30101.47 101.64 101.81 101.98101.13 101.30 101.47 101.64 101.81100.96 101.13 101.30 101.47 101.64100.79 100.96 101.13 101.30 101.47100.62 100.79 100.96 101.13 101.30100.60 100.77 100.94 101.11 101.28102.32102.15101.98101.81101.64101.47101.45102.49 102.58101.54Pave 2" Binder CourseInstall Net Post Footings After Binder.12Install CTD After Striping (See Detail)3201
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net 262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCSurfaceProject #Sheet #7DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion5.022-0262.16.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422 ELEVATIONS ON A 20' X 20' GRIDSTARTING AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNERFINISH ELEVATION TOLERANCESSURFACE COURSE ASPHALT - ±0.02LOWER LEVEL ASPHALT-0 TO -0.03DENSE GRADED AGGREGATE-0 TO -0.03GENERAL NOTES:1 - CONTRACTOR TO SHOOT ELEVATIONS ONSAME GRID AS ABOVE TO VERIFY SURFACE ISWITHIN TOLERANCE. SUBMIT TO CONSULTANT.2 - NET POST AND CENTER TIE DOWN FOOTINGSAND SLEEVES ARE TO BE INSTALLED BEFOREPAVING SURFACE COURSECONTRACTOR OPTION:IF PAVING CONTRACTOR CHOOSES TO INSTALLSET-DOWN PASS, THEN SURFACE COURSE IS TOMATCH JOINT. COLOR CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALLARMOR OVER COLD JOINT30'122' EOA - EOA110' EOA - EOA30' EOC - EOC15' EOC - EOCN101.77101.94102.11102.28102.45102.54102.37102.20102.03101.86101.69100.75100.92101.09101.26101.43100.73100.90101.07101.24101.41101.60101.58102.62102.71101.77101.94102.11102.28102.45101.77101.94102.11102.28101.77101.94102.11101.77101.94101.77101.67101.60101.60101.60101.60101.60101.43101.26101.43101.26101.43101.26101.43101.09101.09100.92Pave 3" Surface On Walk5" PCC Slab With Epoxy Coated Mesh202
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net 262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCColor PlanProject #Sheet #8DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion5.0N22-0262.16.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422 Cut Control Joints Between Courts And Under Net LineArmor Control JointsApply 2 Coats ARApply 2 Coats ColorStripe White Lines For TennisStripe Lighter Blue Lines For Pickleball123456112255343466203
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net 262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCFencing PlanProject #Sheet #9DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion7.0N22-0263.23.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422N 21' Line - IOF12' Line - Line
12' Line - IOF21' Line - IOF12' IOF - Line42' CNP - CNP6' CNP - CNPDrive 3" SS-40 Posts 5' For 10' High Fence On 8' Centers (Galvanized)Install Top/Bottom RailsInstall 2" Galvanized Fence Fabric123108' IOF - IOF120' IOF - IOF 10'10'204
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net 262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCLandscaping PlanProject #Sheet #10DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion5.0N22-0262.16.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422NN Backfill Around Courts And Old Court Site11111Create Flow To CB205
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCDetails PageProject #Sheet #11DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion7.022-0263.23.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 5542220'44'15'7'1'Pickle Ball DetailAGGREGATE BASEGALVANIZED SS-40 POST10'-0"ASPHALT PAVEMENTEXISTING SUB-BASE60"BOTTOM RAILTOP RAILDriven Fence Post DetailCORE HOLE AND CAULK AROUNDPOST WITH CAULK COMPATIBLETO COLOR SYSTEMBase LineCenter MarkCenter Service LineDoubles Net Line(42' Center - Center)Service LineDoubles Side LineSingles Side Line78'21'21'18'36'4' 6"27'13' 6"3'18'78' Court Detail10'Net Post Detail42"24" Diameter5' Deep ConcreteSurfaceBinderNet Post Sleeve
3.5" O.D. SS-40 Post
Driven 1' Into Augured Hole
Before Pouring Concrete Footing.
Leave High And Trim To Height Before Asphalt 42' CNP - CNPCenter Tie-Down Detail1-5/8" Fence TopRail Driven 5', CutFlush To Surface,And Weld a CrossBar For AttachingStrap1-5/8"206
Fred Kolkmann Tennis And Sport Surfaces, LLC1921 Mayfair Rd. Grafton, WI 53024 www.kolkmanncourtbuilder.com Courtbuilder@ameritech.net 262-685-7507Fred Kolkmann
Tennis & Sport Surfaces, LLCDetails Page 2Project #Sheet #12DateCAD ByPeter K.ScaleNTSVersion5.022-0262.16.2023Tennis Courts @
Scheid Park
1856 Toledo Ave N,
Golden Valley, MN 55422 POST CAPCORNERPOSTCHAIN LINK FABRIC(TOP KNUCKLED)TOP RAILRAIL ENDBRACE RAILTENSION BARTRUSS RODTURNBUCKLECHAIN LINK FABRIC( BOTTOM KNUCKLED)- CONCRETE FOOTINGS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY -LINE POSTGATETRANSOMBOTTOM RAIL MIN 1" ABOVE PAVEMENTCORNERPOSTTOP RAILRAIL ENDBRACE RAILTRUSS RODTURNBUCKLEBOTTOM RAIL MIN 1" ABOVE PAVEMENTTypical Fence DetailEND OF SECTION207
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Parks & Recreation
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
3D.2. Approve Agreement for Yosemite Park Play Structure Replacement and Shade Structure Addition
with Minnesota-Wisconsin Playground Inc.
Prepared By
Sheila VanSloun, Parks & Recreation Administrative Assistant
Al Lundstrom, Parks Superintendent
Rick Birno, Parks & Recreation Director
Summary
The 2023-2032 Capital Improvement Program Park Section includes $90,000 for new playground
equipment and a shade structure (P-003). The Yosemite Park play structure is scheduled in 2023 for
replacement.
The Yosemite Park neighborhood participated in a public meeting on May 16, 2023 with the optional
website survey to select one of five proposal submissions. After review of the five play structure and
shade options, the Yosemite Park neighborhood selected the GameTime proposal in the Water color
format (input survey results attached to report). All equipment conforms to ADA and Consumer
Product Safety Commission guidelines.
The total expense for the GameTime play structure and shade structure from Minnesota Wisconsin
Playground is $90,000.00. Installation of the new play structure equipment is scheduled for September
of 2023.
Staff recommends the purchase of the GameTime play structure and shade structure including
installation, as selected by the Yosemite Park neighborhood.
Financial or Budget Considerations
The 2023-2032 Parks Capital Improvement Program budget P003 includes $90,000.00 for the Yosemite
Park play structure and shade structure.
Legal Considerations
Agreement For Local Improvement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
Equity Considerations
Providing unbiased programs and services through infrastructure that supports and advances diversity,
equity, and inclusion in all Golden Valley parks.
208
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute agreement with Minnesota-Wisconsin
Playground for the purchase and installation of the Yosemite Park play structure and shade structure
in the amount of $90,000.
Supporting Documents
Contract for Yosemite Play Structure with Minnesota-Wisconsin Playground Inc.
Resident Input Survey - Yosemite Park
209
1
CONTRACT FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 5
th day of July, 2023 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Minnesota
Playground, Inc., a Minnesota Company located at PO Box 27328, Golden Valley, MN 55427
(“Contractor”), and the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation located at
7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN 55427 (the “City”):
RECITALS
A. Contractor is engaged in the business of providing and installing play structures.
B. The City desires to hire Contractor to provide and install a new playstructure and shade structure
at Yosemite Park.
C. Contractor represents that it has the professional expertise and capabilities to provide the City
with the requested work.
D. The City desires to engage Contractor to provide the work described in this Agreement and
Contractor is willing to provide such work on the terms and conditions in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed herein, the City and
Contractor agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1.The Work.Contractor shall perform the work more fully described in the attached Exhibit A (the
“Work”). The Work includes all work and services required by this Agreement, whether completed or
partially completed, and includes all labor, materials, equipment, and services provided or to be provided
by Contractor to fulfill Contractor’s obligations. All Work shall be completed according to the
specifications set forth in the attached Exhibit B. Contractor shall at all times keep the premises free from
accumulation of waste materials and debris caused by Contractor’s operations.
2.Time for Completion.Contractor shall commence Work not later than September 18, 2023. The
Contractor shall proceed diligently and shall complete the Work to the satisfaction and approval of the
City’s project supervisor on or before October 31, 2023(the “Contract Time”). Contractor shall to notify
the City in writing of any cause of delay of the Work within 24 hours after such cause of delay arises. If
Contractor fails to complete the Work by the Contract Time, the City may immediately, or at any time
thereafter, proceed to complete the Work at the Contractor’s expense. If Contractor gives written notice
of a delay over which Contractor has no control, the Citymay, at its discretion, extend the Contract Time.
3.Consideration.The consideration, which the City shall pay to Contractor, shall not exceed
$90,000. The consideration shall be for both the Workperformed by Contractorand the expenses incurred
by Contractor in performing the Work. The City shall make progress payments to Contractor as follows:
a. $90,000 within 30 days of the Final Completion Date, as that term is defined in section 9
below.
210
2
Contractor shall submit statements to the City containing a detailed list of project labor and hours, rates,
titles, and amounts undertaken by Contractor during the relevant billing period. The City shall pay
Contractor within thirty (30) days after receiving a statement from Contractor.
4.Extra Work.Unless approved by the City in writing, Contractor shall make no claim for extra work
done or materials furnished, nor shall Contractor do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the
plans and specifications of this Agreement. Any such work or materials furnished by Contractor without
written City approval shall be at Contractor’s own risk and expense. Contractor shall perform any altered
plans ordered by the City; if such alteration reduces the cost of doing such work, the actual amount of
such reduction shall be deducted from the contract price for the Work.
5.Contract Documents.The Contract Documents shall consist of this Agreement; all exhibits to this
Agreement, which are incorporated herein by reference; any supplementary drawings, plans, and
specifications; and other documents listed herein.
In the event of a conflict among the various provisions of the Contract Documents, the terms shall be
interpreted in the following order of priority:
a. Modifications to this Agreement
b. This Agreement, including all exhibits
c. Supplementary drawings, plans, specifications
d. Other documents listed in this Agreement
Drawings shall control over Specifications, and detail in drawings shall control over large-scale drawings.
All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Agreement, but defined elsewhere in the
Contract Documents, shall have the meaning set forth in the Contract Documents.
6.Expense Reimbursement.Contractor shall not be compensated separately for necessary
incidental expenses. All expenses of Contractor shall be built into Contractor’s fixed compensation rate,
unless reimbursement is provided for an expense that received the prior written approval of the City,
which approval may be provided via electronic mail.
7.Approvals.Contractor shall secure the City’s written approval before making any expenditures,
purchases, or commitments on the City’s behalf beyond those listed in the Work. The City’s approval
may be provided via electronic mail.
8.Protection of Persons and Property.Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining
and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the performance of the Work.
Contractor shall take reasonable precautions for the safety of, and shall provide reasonable protection to
prevent damage, injury, or loss to:
a. Persons performing the Work and other persons who may be affected by the Work;
b. The Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein; and
c. Other property at the site or adjacent to the site, such as trees, shrubs, lawns, walks,
pavement, roadways, structures and utilities.
Contractor shall promptly remedy damage and loss to property caused in whole or in part by Contractor
or any of its subcontractors, agents, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them.
211
3
9.Acceptance of the Work. All of the Contractor’s work and labor shall be subject to the inspection
and approval of the City. If any materials or labor are rejected by the City as defective or unsuitable, then
the materials shall be removed and replaced with other approved materials and the labor shall be done
to the satisfaction and approval of the City at the Contractor’s sole cost and expense. Contractor shall
replace at Contractor’s expense any loss or damage to the Work, however caused, which occurs during
the construction thereof or prior to the final delivery to and acceptance of the Work by the City. Any
payment made to Contractor, shall not be construed as operating to relieve Contractor from responsibility
for the construction and delivery of Work. Acceptance of the completed Work shall be evidenced only by
a Certificate of Final Completion issued by the City, which shall state the date on which the City accepts
the completed Work (the “Final Completion Date”).
10.Warranty.Contractor represents and warrants that it has the requisite training, skills, and
experience necessary to complete the Work, is appropriately licensed by all applicable agencies and
governmental entities, and will complete the Work in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill
ordinarily exercised by professionals currently providing similar work. Contractor further represents and
warrants to the City that the materials and equipment furnished under this Agreement are of good quality
and new, unless this Agreement requires or permits otherwise. Contractor further warrants that the Work
will conform to the requirements of this Agreement and will be free from defects. Work, materials, or
equipment not conforming to these requirements may be considered defective. Contractor shall promptly
correct any defective Work. Costs of correcting such defective Work, including additional testing and
inspections, the cost of uncovering and replacement, and compensation for any additional services and
expenses made necessary thereby, shall be at Contractor’s expense. Contractor’s warranty shall exclude
remedy for damage or defect caused by abuse, alterations to the Work not executed by Contractor or its
subcontractors, agents, or anyone hired or employed by any of them, improper or insufficient
maintenance, improper operation or normal wear and tear under normal usage.
11.Guarantee.Contractor guarantees and agrees to maintain the stability of the Work and materials
furnished and installed under this contract for a period of one year after the Final Completion Date (the
“Guarantee Period”). Contractor agrees to perform fully all other guarantees as set forth in the
specifications. If any of the Work is found to be not in accordance with the requirements of the Contract
during the Guarantee Period, Contractor shall correct it promptly after receipt of notice from the City to
do so. The City shall give such notice promptly after discovery of the condition. If Contractor fails to correct
nonconforming Work within a reasonable time after receipt of notice from the City, the City may correct
the Work at Contractor’s expense.
The Guarantee Period shall be extended with respect to portions of Work first performed after the Final
Completion Date by the period of time between final payment and the actual completion of that portion
of the Work. The one-year period for correction of Work shall not be extended by corrective Work
performed by Contractor pursuant to this Section.
Nothing contained in this Section shall be construed to establish a period of limitation with respect to
other obligations Contractor has under the Contract Documents. Establishment of the one-year period for
correction of Work as described in this Section relates only to the specific obligation of Contractor to
correct the Work, and has no relationship to the time within which the obligation to comply with the
Contract Documents may be sought to be enforced, nor to the time within which proceedings may be
commenced to establish Contractor’s liability with respect to Contractor’s obligations other than
specifically to correct the Work.
212
4
12.Termination.This Agreement shall remain in force and effect commencing from the effective
date and continuing until the completion of all of the parties’ obligations hereunder, unless terminated
by the City or amended pursuant to the Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof to the
contrary, this Agreement may be terminated as follows:
a. The parties, by mutual written agreement, may terminate this Agreement at any time;
b. Contractor may terminate this Agreement in the event of a breach of the Agreement by the City
upon providing thirty (30) days’ written notice to the City;
c. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time at its option, for any reason or no reason at
all; or
d. The City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon Contractor’s failure to have in force
any insurance required by this Agreement.
In the event of a termination, the City shall pay Contractorfor Work performed to the date of termination
and for all costs or other expenses incurred prior to the date of termination.
13.Amendments.No amendments may be made to this Agreement except in a writing signed by
both parties.
14.Remedies. In the event of a termination of this Agreement by the City because of a breach by
Contractor, the City may complete the Work either by itself or by contract with other persons or entities,
or any combination thereof. These remedies provided to the City for breach of this Agreement by
Contractor shall not be exclusive. The City shall be entitled to exercise any one or more other legal or
equitable remedies available because of Contractor’s breach.
15.Records/Inspection.Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subd. 5, Contractor agrees that
the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Contractor, that are relevant
to the contract or transaction, are subject to examination by the City and the state auditor or legislative
auditor for a minimum of six years. Contractor shall maintain such records for a minimum of six years
after final payment. The parties agree that this obligation will survive the completion or termination of this
Agreement.
10.Indemnification.To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor, and Contractor’s successors
or assigns, agree to protect, defend, indemnify, save, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials,
agents, volunteers, and employees from any and all claims; lawsuits; causes of actionsof any kind,nature,
or character; damages; losses; andcosts, disbursements, and expenses of defending the same, including but
not limited to attorneys’ fees, professional services, and other technical, administrative or professional
assistance resulting from or arising out of Contractor’s (or its subcontractors, agents, volunteers, members,
invitees, representatives, or employees) performance of the duties required by or arising from this
Agreement, or caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct by Contractor,
or arising out of Contractor’s failure to obtain or maintain the insurance required by this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any immunity or limitation on liability to
which the City is entitled. The parties agree that these indemnification obligations shall survive the
completion or termination of this Agreement.
11.Insurance.Contractor shall maintain reasonable insurance coverage throughout this
Agreement. Contractor agrees that before any work related to the approved project can be performed,
Contractor shall maintain at a minimum:
213
5
a. Worker’s Compensation Insurance as required by Minnesota Statutes, section 176.181;
b. Business Auto Liability covering vehicles owned by Contractor and non-owned vehicles used
by Contractor, with policy limits not less than $1,000,000.00 per accident, for bodily injury,
death of any person, and property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance, and
use of such motor vehicles, along with any statutorily required automobile coverage;
c. Commercial General Liability in an amount of not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence,
$2,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 for products-completed operations hazard,
providing coverage for claims including:
i. Damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, including occupational
sickness or disease, and death of any person;
ii. Personal and advertising injury;
iii. Damages because of physical damage to or destruction of property, including loss
of use of such property;
iv. Bodily injury or property damage arising out of completed operations; and
v. Contractor’s indemnity obligations under this Agreement.
To meet the Commercial General Liability and Business Auto Liability requirements, Contractor may use a
combination of Excess and Umbrella coverage. Prior to commencement of the Work, Contractor shall
provide the City with a current certificate of insurance including the following language: “The City of
Golden Valley is named as an additional insured with respect to the commercial general liability, business
automobile liability and umbrella or excess liability, as required by the contract. The umbrella or excess
liability policy follows form on all underlying coverages.” Such certificate of liability insurance shall list the
City as an additional insured and contain a statement that such policies of insurance shall not be canceled
or amended unless 30 days’ written notice is provided to the City, or 10 days’written notice in the case
of non-payment.
12.Compliance with State Withholding Tax. Before final payment is made for the Work on this
project, Contractor must make a satisfactory showing that it has complied with the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, section 290.92 requiring the withholding of State Income Tax for wages paid
employees on this project by providing to the City Engineer a Certificate of Compliance from the
Commissioner of Taxation. Contractor is advised that before such Certificate can be issued, Contractor
must first place on file with the Commissioner of Taxation an affidavit, in the form of an IC-134, that
Contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 290.92.
13.Performance and Payment Bond – Not required for this project
14.Assignment.Neither the City nor Contractor shall assign this Agreement or any rights under or
interest in this Agreement, in whole or in part, without the other party’s prior written consent. Any
assignment in violation of this provision is null and void. Neither the City nor Contractor shall assign, or
transfer any rights under or interest (including, but without limitation, moneys that may become due or
moneys that are due) in the Agreement without the written consent of the other except to the extent that
the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any
written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or
responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent Contractor from
employing such independent consultants, associates, and subcontractors, as it may deem appropriate to
214
6
assist it in the performance of the Work required by this Agreement. Any instrument in violation of this
provision is null and void.
15.Independent Contractor.Contractor is an independent contractor. Contractor’s duties shall be
performed with the understanding that Contractor has special expertise as to the Work which Contractor
is to perform and is customarily engaged inthe independent performance of the same or similar workfor
others. Contractor shall provide or contract for all required equipment and personnel. Contractor shall
control the manner in which the Work is performed; however, the nature of the Work and the results to
be achieved shall be specified by the City.The parties agree that this is not a joint venture and the parties
are not co-partners. Contractoris not an employee or agent of the City and has no authority to make any
binding commitments or obligations on behalf of the City except to the extent expressly provided in this
Agreement. All Work provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by Contractor
as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City for any purpose, including but not limited
to: income tax withholding, workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, FICA taxes, liability
for torts and eligibility for employee benefits.
16.Compliance with Laws.Contractorshall exercise due professional care to comply with applicable
federal, state and local laws, rules, ordinances and regulations in effect as of the Effective Date.
Contractor’sguests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents, employees, volunteers, representatives,
and subcontractors shall abide by theCity’s policies prohibiting sexual harassment and tobacco, drug, and
alcohol use as defined on the City’s Tobacco, Drug, and Alcohol Policy, as well as all other reasonable work
rules, safety rules, or policies, and procedures regulating the conduct of persons on City property, at all
times while performing duties pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor agrees and understands that a
violation of any of these policies, procedures, or rules constitutes a breach of the Agreement and sufficient
grounds for immediate termination of the Agreement by the City.
17.Entire Agreement.The Contract Documents shall constitute the entire agreement between the
City and Contractor, and supersede any other written or oral agreements between the City and
Contractor.
18.Third Party Rights.The parties to this Agreement do not intend to confer any rights under this
Agreement on any third party.
19.Choice of Law and Venue.This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the state of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement
shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Hennepin County, Minnesota, and all parties to this
Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or
otherwise.
20.Work Products and Ownership of Documents. All records, information, materials and other work
products, including, but not limited to the completed reports, drawings, plans, and specifications prepared
and developed in connection with the provision of the Work pursuant to this Agreement shall become the
property of the City, but reproductions of such records, information, materials and other work products
in whole or in part may be retained by Contractor. Regardless of when such information was provided,
Contractor agrees that it will not disclosefor any purpose any information Contractor has obtained arising
out of or related to this Agreement, except as authorized by the City or as required by law. These
obligations survive the termination of this Agreement.
215
7
21.Conflict of Interest.Contractor shall use reasonable care to avoid conflicts of interest and
appearances of impropriety in representation of the City. In the event of a conflict of interest, Contractor
shall advise the City and,either secure a waiver of the conflict, or advise the City that it will be unable to
provide the requested Work.
22.Agreement Not Exclusive.The City retains the right to hire other professionals, contractors and
service providers for this or other matters, in the City’s sole discretion.
23.Data Practices Act Compliance.Any and all data provided to Contractor, received from Contractor,
created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Contractor pursuant to this
Agreement shall be administered in accordance with, and is subject to the requirements of the Minnesota
Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. Contractoragrees to notify the City within
three business days if it receives a data request from a third party. This paragraph does not create a duty
on the part of Contractor to provide access to public data to the public if the public data are available from
the City, except as required by the terms of this Agreement. These obligations shall survive the termination
or completion of this Agreement.
24.No Discrimination.Contractor agrees not to discriminate in providing the Work under this
Agreement on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, status
with regard to public assistance, or religion. Violation of any part of this provision may lead to immediate
termination of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act as
amended (“ADA”), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act,
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363A. Contractoragrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City from costs,
including but not limited to damages, attorneys’ fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought
alleging a violation of these laws by Contractor or its guests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents,
employees, volunteers, representatives and subcontractors. Upon request, Contractor shall provide
accommodation to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all Work under this Agreement.
Contractor agrees to utilize its own auxiliary aid or service in order to comply with ADA requirements for
effective communication with individuals with disabilities.
25.Authorized Agents.The City’s authorized agent for purposes of administration of this contract is
Al Lundstrom, or designee. Contractor’s authorized agent for purposes of administration of this contract
is Harlan Lehman, or designee who shall perform or supervise the performance of all Work.
26.Notices.Any notices permitted or required by this Agreement shall be deemed given when
personally delivered or upon deposit in the United States mail, postage fully prepaid, certified, return
receipt requested, addressed to:
CONTRACTOR THE CITY
Minnesota Playground, Inc.
Harlan Lehman
Po Box 27328
Golden Valley, MN 55427
harlan@mnwiplay.com
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
alundstrom@goldenvalleymn.gov
or such other contact information as either party may provide to the other by notice given in accordance
with this provision.
216
8
26.Waiver.No waiver of any provision or of any breach of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver
of any other provisions or any other or further breach, and no such waiver shall be effective unless made
in writing and signed by an authorized representative of the party to be charged with such a waiver.
27.Headings.The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of
reference only and shall in no way define, limit or affect the scope and intent of this Agreement.
28.Payment of Subcontractors.Contractor agrees to pay all laborers employed and all
subcontractors furnishing material to Contractor in the performance of this contract. If Contractor fails to
pay any claims and demands for labor and materials, the City may apply the monies due to Contractor
toward paying and satisfying such claims and demands. The City has the right to apply monies due to
Contractor towardspaying any accrued indebtedness or any claim which may hereafter come due against
Contractor. The amount of such payments shall be deducted from the balance due to the Contractor;
provided that nothing herein nor any variation from the amounts and timing of the installments shall be
construed as impairing the right of the City or of those to whose benefit the bond herein agreed upon
shall insure, to hold Contractor or surety liable on the bond for any breach of the conditions of the same
nor as imposing upon the City any obligation to laborers, materialmen, contractors, or sureties to pay or
to retain for their benefit any monies coming to the contractor hereunder.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.425, Subdivision 4(a), Contractor must pay any
subcontractor within ten (10) days of Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed
services provided by the subcontractor. Contractor must pay interest of one and one-half percent (1½%)
per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to
the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or
more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due
to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the
Contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney’s fees, incurred in bringing
the action.
29.Severability.In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be illegal or otherwise
unenforceable, such provision shall be severed, and the balance of the Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect.
30.Signatory.Each person executing this Agreement (“Signatory”) representsand warrants that they
are duly authorized to sign on behalf of their respective organization. In the event Contractor did not
authorize the Signatory to sign on its behalf, the Signatory agrees to assume responsibility for the duties
and liability of Contractor, described in this Agreement, personally.
31.Counterparts and Electronic Communication.This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be transmitted by electronic mail in portable
document format (pdf) and signatures appearing on electronic mail instruments shall be treated as
original signatures.
32.Recitals.The City and Contractor agree that the Recitals are true and correct and are fully
incorporated into this Agreement.
217
9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the City and Contractor have caused this Independent Contractor Agreement to
be executed by their duly authorized representatives in duplicate on the respective dates indicated
below.
MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND,INC.:CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY:
By: _________________________________
Name: Harlan Lehman
Title: President
By: _________________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
By: _________________________________
Timothy J. Cruikshank, City Manager
218
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. Structure shall meet and comply with all current ADA Legislation and ASTM F1487.
B. Equipment areas must meet age related design criteria with a structure or structures suitable for 2-5 year
olds and 5-12 year olds and be IPEMA certified.
C. Play structure quote must include two 8’ swing sets with a minimum of two belt swings, one bucket and one
accessible swing (accessible swing should be appropriately located close to an access cutout or container
edge if possible).
D. Play area must include a minimum of two six foot coated steel benches with backs anchored in the ground.
E. Main 5 -12 year old structure frame can be a single pole center staging area or a multi- coated deck system
structure with a minimum of one (1) covered canopy over a deck area. Poles shall be a minimum of 3.5
inches (wall thickness minimum of 0.120”) to a maximum of 5 inches in diameter and constructed of
aluminum or steel.
F. Amenities may include, but not be limited to, slides, climbing walls/ropes/boulders, ladders, play panels,
transfer decks, fire pole, spinner, overhead glider, play accessories, etc.
G. Container for the play structure is outlined in Attachment B and needs to include the structure(s), swing set
and benches. For onsite visit please contact Al Lundstrom at 763-593-8046.
H. Proposal must also include the installation of a 15’ x 15’ concrete pad (next to the internal park trail - see
attachment B) with a center pole permanent fabric shade umbrella that is designed for all seasons.
Contractor is expected to recommend appropriate size umbrella for the dimensions of the concrete pad.
I.Site shall have signage information provided appropriate for the structure/area. If there are pictures of
future structure users please make sure signage is representative of all community members
J.Provide wear pads in quote for all slides, swings and transfer points (must be a minimum of 2’x4’).
K. Please include blown in engineered wood fiber at a depth 12” or greater for the entire container area.
L. All plastic and coating products must be UV and color stabilized to resist fading.
M. Supplier must be able to provide a tool kit for fasteners, parts manual (both hard copy and electronic
preferred) and touch up paint kit for all structure colors.
N. All parts must have a corrosion resistant finish and be capped on the top end.
219
O. All metal decks must be manufactured from sheet steel conforming to ASTM specification A-569 (or better)
and be finished with a coating.
P. All connecting hardware used must be zinc plated or stainless steel, free of protrusions, vandal resistant and
have a tamper proof design. Service kit for tamper proof fasteners must also be provided.
City’s Responsibilities to Project
Demo and dispose of old playground equipment.
Site rough grading and leveling for both the play structure container and the umbrella pad.
Installation of concrete container curb border (if needed).
Removal of project spoils (contractor to remove all packaging materials)
Finish grading and seeding.
Regulatory Compliance
1. All equipment provided and all areas around and between equipment must comply with most current
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) guidelines and The American Society for Testing and Material
(ASTM) standards. It is the responsibility of each bidder and manufacturer to be aware of these guidelines.
Please list all deviations where you do not comply totally and explain each in detail when submitting the
proposal. Equipment that requires labor intensive measures or modifications, after installation, such as the
cutting of bolts, to bring equipment into conformance with CPSC and ASTM will not be accepted. As
recommended by CPSC, a project specific maintenance manual shall be provided at the end of the project.
2. Playground structure, benches and swing set must meet the current requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act and ASTM F1487.
3. All equipment must be IPEMA certified.
4. All surfacing materials must meet current CPSC guidelines, ASTM F1951 and ASTM F1292 standards, as well
as be IPEMA certified.
5. Once installation is complete on all equipment, supplier must provide a formal safety audit of the
installed equipment. Audit must document that equipment meets all current standards listed above.
Payment for project will not be paid until after the safety audit inspection and document has been
completed and delivered from a certified playground inspector.
6. Supplier must invoice City for all payments.
220
Exhibit B
CONTAINER FOR PLAY STRUCTURE
221
Yosemite Park Future Improvements Survey
1 / 2
30.77%12
5.13%2
0.00%0
12.82%5
51.28%20
Q1 Vote for your favorite color pallet for the new play structure (color
options below)
Answered: 39 Sk ipped: 0
TOTAL 39
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%1 00%
Nat ur al:
Forest Green...
Bright
Primar y: Red...
Jel l ybean:
Burgundy, Bl ...
Circus : Spr ing
Green, Sky...
Water: Bl ue,
Champagne, D...
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Natural: Fores t Green, Beige, Brown, Granite, and Sands tone
Bright Primary : Red, Yellow, Blue, Green, and Purple
Jellybean: Burgundy, Blue, Buttersc otch, Gray, and Black
Circus : Spring Green, Sk y Blue, Red, Butterscotch, and Granite
Water: Blue, Champagne, Dark Blue, Burgundy, and Sky Blue
222
Yosemite Park Future Improvements Survey
2 / 2
41.03%16
25.64%10
23.08%9
10.26%4
0.00%0
Q2 Vote for your favorite play structure (options below)
Answered: 39 Sk ipped: 0
TOTAL 39
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%1 00%
GameTime
Mir acle
Lands cape
Structures
Playw or ld
Play & Park
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
GameTime
Mirac le
Landscape Struct ures
Play world
Play & Park
223
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Community Development
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
3D.3. Authorize Agreement for DeCola Ponds SEA School-Wildwood Park Restoration Project #23-14
with Landbridge Ecological
Prepared By
Eric Eckman, Environmental Resources Supervisor
Drew Chirpich, Water and Natural Resources Specialist
Summary
The City applied and received funding from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR)
Flood Damage Reduction Grant Assistance Program to help fund the construction of a series of capital
projects outlined in the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue Area Long Term Flood Mitigation
Plan. Building onto the construction of the Liberty Crossing flood storage, the first phase of the grant
funded project was the DeCola Ponds B and C Improvement Project funded in part by the 2018 state
bonding bill and completed in 2020.
The current phase of the grant funded project is the SEA School-Wildwood Park Flood Storage Project.
This project was included in the 2020 state bonding bill with an allocation of $1,300,000. The project is
also included in the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) capital
improvement program and BCWMC is contributing a significant amount of funding for the project.
In September 2021, the City Council approved a cooperative agreement with the BCWMC and a
professional services agreement with Barr Engineering Co to design and construct the SEA School-
Wildwood Park Flood Storage Project. The project includes flood risk reduction, storm water quality
treatment, pollinator habitat improvements, and recreation and educational opportunities that will
benefit the community. More information can be found on the City's project webpage at
https://bit.ly/3FJpv0s.
In order to advance the City’s equity goals, complete work in the most efficient and cost-effective
manner, and best meet the scheduling needs of the SEA School, the project was separated into three
smaller, more specialized contracts:
Flood storage at SEA School and Wildwood Park (currently under construction; estimated
completion date August 2023)
Restoration and vegetation establishment at SEA School and Wildwood Park (consider awarding
contract July 5; begin work in August 2023 following construction of flood storage)
Flood conveyance (storm sewer outlet pipe replacement) between DeCola Ponds D and E
224
(currently out for bids; work to begin in September 2023)
The restoration contract was advertised for bids in June. Bids were opened virtually on June 20, 2023.
The following bids were received for the DeCola Ponds SEA School-Wildwood Park Restoration Project
#23-14:
Contractor Base Bid
Landbridge Ecological Inc $245,429.95
RES, LLC $260,750.70
Hoffman & McNamara CO $303,432.33
Low Bid: Landbridge Ecological Inc $245,429.95
Staff reviewed the bids and found them to be accurate and in order. Staff recommends awarding the
restoration and vegetation establishment contract to Landbridge Ecological Inc for the base bid
amount of $245,429.95. Landbridge Ecological Inc is a locally owned and operated small, Woman-
Owned Business Enterprise and is certified as a DBE. As a requirement of the state grant, this contract
requires payment of prevailing wages. Work is expected to begin in August 2023 and be completed in
the fall. This contract includes three seasons of vegetation establishment, management, and
monitoring to ensure the ongoing success of the native environments.
Financial or Budget Considerations
The cost estimate for the entire project (flood storage, conveyance, and restoration) is approximately
$3,100,000. Based on funding allocated in the 2020 bonding bill, the DNR will provide $1,300,000 and
the City and its partners will provide a local match of $1,300,000 plus any remaining funding to
complete the project. There are no special assessments to residents.
Following is an estimate of the funding sources for the entire project:
MnDNR $1,300,000
BCWMC $1,300,000
Hennepin County $ 255,000
City of Golden Valley $ 245,000
Total $3,100,000
As is typical with collaborative projects like this one, project costs will be paid up front by the City and
reimbursed by the MnDNR and its local partners on a regular basis, as project milestones are reached.
The City’s portion of the project funding is included in the 2022 and 2023 CIP as approved by City
Council at its March 7 meeting, as follows:
Stormwater SS-69 $110,000
Park Improvement P-002 $ 95,000
Park Improvement P-017 $ 40,000
Legal Considerations
This agreement is in a form approved by the City Attorney.
Equity Considerations
225
This contract was subject to a public bidding process open to all qualified contractors. Consistent with
the City’s Equity Plan pillar, Economic Prosperity For All , the overall flood mitigation project was
separated into three smaller contracts, which offers more opportunities to a wider array of
contractors.
Increasing community resilience by reducing flood risk and damage, improving water quality, and
increasing native pollinator habitat is consistent with City's resilience and sustainability plan and helps
all people in the community adapt to a changing climate.
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute an agreement with Landbridge Ecological
Inc in the form approved by the City Attorney for the DeCola Ponds SEA School-Wildwood Park
Restoration Project #23-14 in the amount of $245,429.95.
Supporting Documents
PSA SEA School-Wildwood Park Vegetation Restoration Project with Landbridge Ecological
Project Location Map
226
FC - 1
CONTRACT NO. 23-14
AGREEMENT FOR SEA SCHOOL-WILDWOOD PARK
FLOOD MITIGATION RESTORATION PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), entered into the 5th day of July 2023 between the
City of Golden Valley (the "City"), a municipal corporation, existing under the laws of the
State of Minnesota, and Landbridge Ecological, Inc. DBA Wetland Habitat Restoration,a
corporation under the laws of Minnesota ("Contractor").
ARTICLE 1. The Contract Documents.The Contract Documents consist of this
Agreement, the Proposal and Bid of the Contractor, the Contractor's Bonds, the General
Conditions, Special Conditions and any supplementary conditions, drawings, plans,
Specifications, addenda issued prior to execution of this Agreement, other documents
listed herein or in any of the foregoing documents, and Modifications of the same issued
after execution of this Agreement (collectively the "Contract" or "Contract Documents").
A Modification is (1) a written amendment to the Contract signed by both parties, (2) a
Change Order, (3) a Construction Change Directive, or (4) a written order for a minor
change in the Work issued by the Engineer.
In the event of a conflict among the various provisions of the Contract Documents, the
terms shall be interpreted in the following order of priority:
1. Modifications to the Contract
2. This Agreement
3. Special Conditions
4. General Conditions
Drawings shall control over Specifications, and detail in drawings shall control over
large-scale drawings.
All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Agreement, but defined
elsewhere in the Contract Documents, shall have the meaning set forth in the Contract
Documents.
ARTICLE 2. The Work.Contractor, for good and valuable consideration the sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, covenants and agrees to furnish all materials, all
necessary tools and equipment, and to do and perform all work and labor necessary for
SEA School-Wildwood Park Flood Mitigation Restoration Project (23-14) (the "Project")
according to the Plans and Specifications and all of the Contract Documents.
Contractor shall commence and conclude the Work in accordance with the Contract
Documents. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Accordingly, Contractor shall
complete the Work in accordance with the time schedule for commencement and
completion of the Work set forth in the Contract Documents. Contractor shall complete
the Work in every respect to the satisfaction and approval of the City.
227
FC - 2
ARTICLE 3. Contract Price.The City shall pay the Contractor the Contract Price in
current funds for the Contractor's performance of the Contract. The Contract Price shall
be $245,529.95, subject to additions and deductions as provided in the Contract
Documents.
Installment payments, if any, on account of the Work shall be made in accordance with
the provisions of the General Conditions. Final payment shall be due and payable on or
before thirty (30) days after issuance of a Certificate of Final Completion issued by the
City Engineer confirming that the Work has been fully completed and Contractor's
obligations fully performed by Contractor.
ARTICLE 4. Contractor's Bonds.Contractor shall make, execute, and deliver to the
City corporate surety bonds in a form approved by the City, in the sum of $245,529.95
for the use of the City and of all persons furnishing labor, skill, tools, machinery or
materials to the Project. Said bonds shall secure the faithful performance and payment
of the Contract by the Contractor and shall be conditioned as required by law. This
Agreement shall not become effective unless and until said bonds have been received
and approved by the City.
ARTICLE 5. Acceptance of the Work.The City, through its authorized agents, shall
be the sole and final judge of the fitness of the Work and its acceptability.
ARTICLE 6. Records.Contractor shall keep as complete, exact and accurate an
account of the labor and materials used in the execution of the Work as is possible and
shall submit and make this information available as maybe requested by the City.
ARTICLE 7. Payment.All payments to Contractor shall be made payable to the order
of Landbridge Ecological, Inc. DBA Wetland Habitat Restoration, and the City does not
assume and shall not have any responsibility for the allocation of payments or
obligations of the Contractor to third parties.
ARTICLE 8. Cancellation Prior to Execution.The City reserves the right, without
liability, to cancel the award of the Contract at any time before the execution of the
Contract by all parties.
ARTICLE 9. Termination.The City may by written notice terminate the Contract, or
any portion thereof, when (1) it is deemed in the best public, state or national interest to
do so; (2) the City is unable to adequately fund payment for the Contract because of
changes in state fiscal policy, regulations or law; or (3) after finding that, for reasons
beyond Contractor's control, Contractor is prevented from proceeding with or
completing the Work within a reasonable time.
In the event that any Work is terminated under the provisions hereof, all completed
items or units of Work will be paid for at Contract Bid Prices. Payment for partially
completed items or units of Work will be made in accordance with the Contract
Documents.
228
FC - 3
Termination of the Contract or any portion thereof shall not relieve Contractor of
responsibility for the completed Work, nor shall it relieve Contractor's Sureties of their
obligations for and concerning any just claims arising out of the Work.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, both parties hereto have caused this Contract to be signed
on their respective behalves by their duly authorized offices and their corporate seals to
be hereunto affixed the day and year first above written.
THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
BY
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
BY
Timothy J. Cruikshank, City Manager
LANDBRIDGE ECOLOGICAL, INC
DBA WETLAND HABITAT RESTORATION
BY
ITS
229
Ha mpsh ire Po nd
DecolaPond A
DecolaPonds B & C
De colaPondE
De colaPond F
De colaPond D
Golden Meadows Pond
Medicine La ke Road Pond
Dover HillPondLiberty BasinCanadian Pacific Railroad
HampshirePark
PennsylvaniaWoods
WildwoodPark
IsaacsonPark
MadisonPond
156
DeCola PondsOutlet Pipe Replacement
School ofEngineeringand Arts
Duluth St
Olympia StKelly DrDeCola PondsSEA School-Wildood ParkFlood Storage
Duluth St
Olympia StWinnetka Ave NKelly DrMedicine Lake Rd
Sumter Ave NQuebec Ave NPennsylvania Ave NRhode Island Ave NSandburg RdNevada Ave NWinnetka Heights Dr
23r d Av e N
Winsdale St
Sandburg Ln
Oregon Ave NMadison Ave W
Green Valley Rd Louisiana Ave NArcher Ave N
Winsdale St
0 500 1,000250Feet
Print Date: 4/18/2023Sources:-Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines (2023).-City of Golden Valley for all other layers.Location Map
230
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Communications
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
3D.4. Authorize Agreement for Referendum Communications & Consulting Services with Rapp
Strategies, Inc.
Prepared By
Cheryl Weiler, Communications Director
Summary
City staff seeks to hire Rapp Strategies, Inc to provide strategic counsel and communications services
to support a public information and community engagement program related to the City’s sales tax
referendum on Nov 7, 2023.
Staff posted a RFP for these referendum communications and consulting services on the City website,
garnering two responses. Base costs ranged from $39,500 to $164,010. Upon review by City staff, Rapp
Strategies, Inc was chosen for its ability to meet the City’s required elements and deliverables for the
most affordable cost.
The public information and community engagement program will include development of a
community survey and analysis of findings, development of messaging and materials to inform voters
about the referendum using City communications tools, and identification of community input
opportunities.
Financial or Budget Considerations
The base fee for the outlined services is $39,500 and will be taken from the Building Fund.
Legal Considerations
Contract has been reviewed by the City Attorney and approved to move forward.
Equity Considerations
Rapp Strategies, Inc is committed to designing a communications program to help the City reach all
residents in the community.
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize an agreement for professional communications and consulting services with Rapp
Strategies, Inc in an amount of $39,500.
Supporting Documents
231
Agreement for Referendum Communications & Consulting Services with Rapp Strategies, Inc
232
1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR
REFERENDUM COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made this July 6, 2023 (“Effective Date”) by and between Rapp Strategies,
Inc.(“Contractor”), a strategic communications firm based in Minnesota with its principal office located
at333 S. 7thSt. Suite 2120 Minneapolis, MN 55402, and the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, a Minnesota
municipal corporation located at 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN 55427 (the “City”):
RECITALS
A. Contractor is engaged in the business of providing professional communications services and
strategic communications counseling.
B. The City desires to hire Contractor to provide strategic communications counseling and
communications services to support Client’s public information and community engagement program
related to the City’s sales tax referendum on November 7, 2023.
C. Contractor represents that it has the professional expertise and capabilities to provide the City
with the requested services.
D. The City desires to engage Contractor to provide the services described in this Agreement and
Contractor is willing to provide such services on the terms and conditions in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed in this Agreement, the City and
Contractor agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1.Services.Contractor agrees to providethe City with the services as described in the attached Exhibit A
(the “Services”). Exhibit A shall be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. All Services shall be
provided in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals
currently providing similar services.
2.State Statute Compliance: Rapp Strategies specifically acknowledges that City is subject to Minn. Stat.
§297A.99, subd. 1(d) and Rapp Strategies agrees that all work contemplated by this Agreement will be
subject to City’s review and final approval prior to publication so that City may ensure compliance with
that statute and other applicable law.
3.Time for Completion.The Services shall be completed on or before November 30, 2023, provided that
the parties may extend the stated deadlines upon mutual written agreement. This Agreement shall remain
in force and effect commencing from the effective date and continuing until the completion of the project,
unless terminated by the City or amended pursuant to the Agreement.
4.Consideration.The City shall pay Contractorfor the Services according to the terms on theFee Schedule
attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein. The consideration shall be for both the Services
performed by Contractorand any expenses incurred by Contractor in performing the Services. Contractor
233
2
shall submit statements to the City upon completion of the Services. The City shall pay Contractor within
thirty (30) days after Contractor’s statements are submitted.
5.Termination.Notwithstanding any other provision hereof to the contrary, this Agreement may be
terminated as follows:
a. The parties, by mutual written agreement, may terminate this Agreement at any time;
b. Contractor may terminate this Agreement in the event of a breach of the Agreement by the City
upon providing thirty (30) days’ written notice to the City;
c. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time at its option, for any reason or no reason at
all; or
d. The City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon Contractor’s failure to have in force
any insurance required by this Agreement.
In the event of a termination, the City shall pay Contractor for Services performed to the date of
termination and for all costs or other expenses incurred prior to the date of termination.
5.Amendments.No amendments may be made to this Agreement except in a writing signed by both
parties.
6.Remedies.In the event of a termination of this Agreement by the City because of a breach by
Contractor, the City may complete the Services either by itself or by contract with other persons or
entities, or any combination thereof. These remedies provided to the City for breach of this Agreement
by Contractor shall not be exclusive. The City shall be entitled to exercise any one or more other legal or
equitable remedies available because of Contractor’s breach.
7.Records/Inspection.Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subd. 5, Contractor agrees that the
books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Contractor, that are relevant to
the contract or transaction, are subject to examination by the City and the state auditor or legislative
auditor for a minimum of six years.Contractorshall maintain such records fora minimum of six years after
final payment. The parties agree that this obligation will survive the completion or termination of this
Agreement.
8.Indemnification.To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor, and Contractor’s successors or
assigns, agree to protect, defend, indemnify, save, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents,
volunteers, and employees from any and all claims; lawsuits; causes of actions of any kind, nature, or
character; damages; losses; or costs, disbursements, and expenses of defending the same, including but not
limited to attorneys’ fees, professional services, and other technical, administrative or professional assistance
resulting from or arising out of Contractor’s (or its subcontractors, agents, volunteers, members, invitees,
representatives, or employees) performance of the duties required by or arising from this Agreement, or
caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission or willful misconductby Contractor, or arising out
of Contractor’s failure to obtain or maintain the insurance required by this Agreement. Nothing in this
Agreement shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any immunity or limitation on liability to which the City
is entitled.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the City agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, save, and hold
harmless the Contractor, its officers, officials, agents, volunteers, and employees from any and all claims;
lawsuits; causes of actionsof any kind, nature, or character; damages; losses; or costs, disbursements, and
expenses of defending the same, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, professional services, and other
234
3
technical, administrative or professional assistance resulting from or arising out of City’s (or its
subcontractors, agents, volunteers, members, invitees, representatives, or employees) performance of the
duties required by or arising from this Agreement, or caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or
omission or willful misconduct by City.
The parties agree that these indemnification obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this
Agreement.
9.Insurance.Contractor shall maintain reasonable insurance coverage throughout this Agreement.
Contractor agrees that before any work related to the approved project can be performed, Contractor
shall maintain at a minimum: Worker’s Compensation Insurance as required by Minnesota Statutes,
section 176.181; Business Auto Liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence;
Professional Liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence; and Commercial General
Liability in an amount of not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury or death arising out
of each occurrence, and $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for property damage, $2,000,000.00 aggregate. To
meet the Commercial General Liability and Business Auto Liability requirements, Contractor may use a
combination of Excess and Umbrella coverage. Contractor shall provide the City with a current certificate
of insurance including the following language: “The City of Golden Valleyis named as an additional insured
with respect to the commercial general liability, business automobile liability and umbrella or excess
liability, as required by the contract. The umbrella or excess liability policy follows form on all underlying
coverages.” Such certificate of liability insurance shall list the City as an additional insured and contain a
statement that such policies of insurance shall not be canceled or amendedunless 30 days’written notice
is provided to the City, or 10 days’written notice in the case of non-payment.
10.Subcontracting.Neither the City nor Contractor shall assign, or transfer any rights under or interest
(including, but without limitation, moneys that may become due or moneys that are due) in the
Agreement without the written consent of the other except to the extent that the effect of this limitation
may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an
assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under
this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent Contractor from employing such
independent Contractors, associates, and subcontractors, as it may deem appropriate to assist it in the
performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Any instrument in violation of this provision is
null and void.
11.Assignment.NeithertheCity nor Contractorshall assign this Agreement or any rights under or interest
in this Agreement, in whole or in part, without the other party’s prior written consent. Any assignment in
violation of this provision is null and void.
12.Independent Contractor.Contractor is an independent contractor. Contractor’s duties shall be
performed with the understanding that Contractor has special expertise as to the services which
Contractor is to perform and is customarily engaged in the independent performance of the same or
similar services for others.Contractor shall provide or contract for all required equipment and personnel.
Contractor shall control the manner in which the services are performed; however, the nature of the
Services and the results to be achieved shall be specified by the City. The parties agree that this is not a
joint venture and the parties are not co-partners. Contractor is not an employee or agent of the City and
has no authority to make any binding commitments or obligations on behalf of the City except to the
extent expressly provided in this Agreement. All services provided by Contractor pursuant to this
Agreement shall be provided by Contractor as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the
235
4
City for any purpose, including but not limited to: income tax withholding, workers' compensation,
unemployment compensation, FICA taxes, liability for torts and eligibility for employee benefits.
13. As requested by the City, Rapp Strategies will provide website design services using a Squarespace
template to be published on the City’s account on an Internet Service Provider (ISP) hosting service. In
accordance with the Squarespace Terms and Conditions, the City will own the website and the content
thereof. Other than as described in Section Number 1.b. herein, the City will be solely responsible for
maintaining the website and purchasing and renewing the URL(s) and hosting services through the
appropriate third-party vendors. During the term of this Agreement, the City authorizes Rapp Strategies
to access the relevant website account(s) and authorizes the City’s hosting service to provide Rapp
Strategies with access to the Client’s account(s) so that Rapp Strategies may perform design services and
City-approved content may be populated to the website.
14. Rapp Strategies is providing website design services “as is” and makes no warranties or
representations, either express or implied, that the website will be uninterrupted, error-free, free from
viruses or other harmful components. In no event will Rapp Strategies be liable for any damages arising
out of the operation of or inability to operate the website, including, but not limited to, client-approved
content, service interruptions, security issues, or hacking. This section shall survive the termination or
expiration of this Agreement.
15.Compliance with Laws.Contractor shall exercise due professional care to comply with applicable
federal, state and local laws, rules, ordinances and regulations in effect as of the date Contractor agrees
to provide the Services. Contractor’s guests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents, employees,
volunteers, representatives, and subcontractors shall abide by the City’s policies prohibiting sexual
harassment andtobacco, drug, and alcohol use as definedon the City’s Tobacco, Drug, and Alcohol Policy,
as well as all other reasonable work rules, safety rules, or policies, and procedures regulating the conduct
of persons on City property, at all times while performing duties pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor
agrees and understands that a violation of any of these policies, procedures, or rules constitutes a breach
of the Agreement and sufficient grounds for immediate termination of the Agreement by the City.
16.Entire Agreement.This Agreement, any attached exhibits, and any addendasigned by the parties shall
constitute the entire agreement between the City and Contractor, and supersedes any other written or
oral agreements between the City and Contractor. This Agreement may only be modified in a writing
signed by the City and Contractor. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the
referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. If there is any conflict between
Exhibits A and B, the terms of Exhibit B shall prevail.
17.Third Party Rights.The parties to this Agreement do not intend to confer any rights under this
Agreement on any third party.
18.Choice of Law and Venue.This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the state of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall
be heard in the state or federal courts of Hennepin County, Minnesota, and all parties to this Agreement
waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or otherwise.
19.Conflict of Interest.Contractor shall use reasonable care to avoid conflicts of interest and
appearances of impropriety in representation of the City. In the event of a conflict of interest, Contractor
236
5
shall advise the City and,either secure a waiver of the conflict, or advise the City that it will be unable to
provide the requested Services.
20.Work Products and Ownership of Documents.All records, information, materials, and work product,
including, but not limited to the completed reports, data collected from or created by the City orthe City’s
employees or agents, raw market data, survey data, market analysis data, and any other data, work
product, or reports prepared or developed in connection with the provision of the Services pursuant to
this Agreement shall become the property of the City, but Contractor may retain reproductions of such
records, information, materials and work product. Regardless of when such information was provided or
created, Contractor agrees that it will not disclose for any purpose any information Contractor has
obtained arising out of or related to this Agreement, except as authorized by the City or as required by
law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall grant or transfer any rights, title or
interests in any intellectual property created by Contractor prior to the effective date of this Agreement;
however, to the extent Contractor generates reports or recommendations for the City using proprietary
processes or formulas, Contractor shall provide the City (1) factual support for such reports and
recommendations; (2) a detailed explanation of the method used and data relied upon to arrive at the
recommendation; and (3) a detailed explanation of the rationale behind the methodologyused. All of the
obligations in this paragraph shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement.
21.Agreement Not Exclusive.The City retains the right to hire other professional Contractor service
providers for this or other matters, in the City’s sole discretion.
22.Data Practices Act Compliance.Any and all data provided to Contractor, received from Contractor,
created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Contractor pursuant to this
Agreement shall be administered in accordance with, and is subject to the requirements of the Minnesota
Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13.Contractor agrees to notify the City within
three business days if it receives a data request from a third party. This paragraph does not create a duty
on the part of Contractor to provide access to public data to the public if the public data are available from
the City, except as required by the terms of this Agreement.These obligations shall survive the termination
or completion of this Agreement.
23.No Discrimination.Contractor agrees not to discriminate in providing products and services under this
Agreement on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, status
with regard to public assistance, or religion. Violation of any part of this provision may lead to immediate
termination of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act as
amended (“ADA”), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act,
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363A. Contractoragrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City from costs,
including but not limited to damages, attorneys’ fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought
alleging a violation of these laws by Contractor or its guests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents,
employees, volunteers, representatives and subcontractors. Upon request, Contractor shall provide
accommodation to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all Services under this Agreement.
Contractor agrees to utilize its own auxiliary aid or service in order to comply with ADA requirements for
effective communication with individuals with disabilities.
24.Authorized Agents.The City’s authorized agent for purposes of administration of this contract is Cheryl
Weiler, the Communications Director of the City, or designee.Contractor’s authorized agent for purposes
of administration of this contract is Todd Rapp, CEO of Rapp Strategies. Todd Stone, Managing Director of
Rapp Strategies, willsupervise the performance of all Services.
237
6
25.Notices.Any notices permitted or required by this Agreement shall be deemed given when personally
delivered or upon deposit in the United States mail, postage fully prepaid, certified, return receipt
requested, addressed to:
CONTRACTOR THE CITY
Todd Rapp
Rapp Strategies, Inc.
333 S. 7th Street Suite 2120
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Toddrapp@rappstrategies.com
Cheryl Weiler
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
cweiler@goldenvalleymn.gov
or such other contact information as either party may provide to the other by notice given in accordance
with this provision.
26.Waiver.No waiver of any provision or of any breach of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of
any other provisions or any other or further breach, and no such waiver shall be effective unless made in
writing and signed by an authorized representative of the party to be charged with such a waiver.
27.Headings.The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference
only and shall in no way define, limit or affect the scope and intent of this Agreement.
28.Payment of Subcontractors.Contractor agrees that it must pay any subcontractor within 10 days of
the prime contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed Services provided by the
subcontractor. Contractor agrees that it must pay interest of 1-1/2 percent per month or any part of a
month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The
minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid
balance of less than $100, the prime contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A
subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from a prime contractor must be
awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in bringing the action.
29.Publicity.At the City’s request,theCity and Contractorshall develop language to use when discussing
the Services. Contractor agrees that Contractor shall not release any publicity regarding the Services or
the subject matter of this Agreement without prior consent from the City. Contractor shall not use the
City’s logo or state that the City endorses its services without the City’s advanced written approval.
30.Severability.In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be illegal or otherwise
unenforceable, such provision shall be severed, and the balance of the Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect.
31.Signatory.Each person executing this Agreement (“Signatory”) represents and warrants that they are
duly authorized to sign on behalf of their respective organization. In the event Contractor did not
authorize the Signatory to sign on its behalf, the Signatory agrees to assume responsibility for the duties
and liability of Contractor, described in this Agreement, personally.
32.Counterparts and Electronic Signatures.This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be transmitted by electronic mail in portable
238
7
document format (“pdf”) and signatures appearing on electronic mail instruments shall be treated as
original signatures.
33.Recitals.The City and Contractor agree that the Recitals are true and correct and are fully
incorporated into this Agreement.
[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.Signature page follows.]
239
8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the City and Contractor have caused this Professional Services Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below.
RAPP STRATEGIES,INC.:CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY:
By: _________________________________
Todd Rapp, CEO Rapp Strategies, Inc.
By: _________________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
By: _________________________________
Timothy J. Cruikshank, City Manager
240
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
1. Lead weekly planning and strategy meetings.
2. Conduct community survey analysis − working with a polling vendor chosen by the city −
using a 400-sample of adult residents.
a. Present findings and analysis to the City Council and City staff.
3. Develop messaging to inform voters about the projects and referendum.
4. Create a month-by-month communications workplan, including editorial calendar, using City tools
(newsletters social media, email, online video streaming) through Nov. 30.
a. Help identify opportunities to provide information to all demographic communities within
Golden Valley. This would include developing communications materials that
communicate in the top three languages spoken in the City (English, Russian, Spanish).
Rapp Strategies will also work with the city to identify and leverage communications
platforms, community events, media outlets and other opportunities to help reach all
diverse communities within the city.
5. Develop and design a referendum brand/logo.
6. Design and populate a referendum website, including FAQ.
7. Draft one press release announcing the launch of the microsite and the city’s public information
program about the project and referendum. Will include translation functionality with the top
three languages in print provided on the microsite.
8. Draft a series of social media posts announcing the public information plan, and two to three
social media posts a week through Election Day (after debut of microsite).
9. Create two fact sheets describing the project and referendum.
10. Develop one slide presentation (10-12 slides) for community meetings.
11. Create two mailers to all postal customers regarding projects and referendum.
12. Write two guest columns by a government leader for local media.
13. Lead training sessions for council members and key City staff to prepare for public questions and
interviews.
14. Provide post-election communications planning.
241
EXHIBIT B
FEE SCHEDULE
City agrees to pay Rapp Strategies a fixed fee of $39,500.00 for the services described in Exhibit A, including
professional fees, ordinary office expenses and travel to Golden Valley up to twice monthly. Rapp Strategies will
invoice the Client $7,900 per month for each of the five months from July through November 2023.
242
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Community Development
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
3E. Adopt Resolutions 23-058, 23-059, and 23-060 Approving Transfer of Home Ownership Program
for Equity (HOPE) Properties to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Prepared By
Cherie Shoquist, Housing and Economic Development Manager
Summary
This item is the final step in authorizing the transfer of surplus property from the City/HRA to
previously selected developers for the purpose of developing affordable housing. The City Council
approved the Public Land Disposition Ordinance to prioritize surplus public land for affordable housing
on December 21, 2021 (Motion Carried 5-0). In response, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
approved the Home Ownership Program for Equity and authorized the release of a Request for
Qualifications process on June 21, 2022 (Motion Carried 5-0). The HRA approved the following
qualified developers, funding contingent, to develop affordable homeownership options on city-
owned land on August 16, 2022 (Motion Carried 5-0):
Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity to develop a single family home at 1605 Douglas Drive North
Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation to develop a single family home at 4707 Circle Down
Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation to develop a single family home at 208 Meander
Road
The June 21, 2022 HRA approval of the land write down in the HOPE Guidelines and the August 16,
2022 approval of the developers for specific properties satisfied funders requirements for both site
control and funding leverage. The developers successfully competed for development gap funding.
To contribute toward the development, fill the financial affordability gap and leverage funding partner
resources, the City and the HRA will consider providing a land write down to the developers and will
sell each property for $1.
Staff recommends the City resolves to convey and quit claim to the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority the following properties: 1605 Douglas Drive North, 47XX Circle Down, and 208 Meander
Road for the Home Ownership Program for Equity. The properties will be subsequently transfered
from the HRA to the respective developers.
Financial or Budget Considerations
The appraised values are: $165,000 for 1605 Douglas Drive North, $165,000- $170,000 for 4707 Circle
243
Down, and $175,000 for 208 Meander Road. It is standard practice of local governments to write down
the value of the land toward the development of the land for public benefit purposes previously
authorized by the governing body.
Legal Considerations
The properties are currently owned by the City. This action will convey them to the HRA. The HRA will
subsequently convey the properties to the respective developers.
Equity Considerations
The Home Ownership Program for Equity meets the City’s goals to preserve and promote economically
diverse housing options in our community by creating high quality housing in Golden Valley for
households with a variety of income levels, ages, and sizes. Dedicated publicly owned land for more
affordable housing for homeownership is a valuable resource to meet our affordable housing goals.
HOPE recognizes that systemic racism in housing occurs today — Black, Indigenous, and other
communities of color continue to face discrimination and lack of access to affordable housing and
home ownership. There are currently approximately 1,603 racially restrictive covenants in Golden
Valley including 61 covenants on City/HRA owned parcels. The HOPE properties at 1605 Douglas Drive
and 208 Meander Road have a racially restrictive covenant that will be discharged before the
properties are transferred.
Cities must also be more inclusive of populations from diverse populations by creating opportunities
and resources for housing that are accessible at all affordability levels. Given existing racial and
economic disparities in housing, providing both affordable rental and homeownership opportunity is
not only vital to providing all individuals and families with housing choice, but also with access to
stable housing that impacts their health, education, employment, and ability to build wealth.
HOPE prioritized proposals from organizations that have demonstrated success in building
relationships of trust with Black, Indigenous and People of Color populations and in serving first
generation homebuyers. Serving homebuyers with annual incomes at 60% - 80% of Area Median
Income as defined by Minnesota Housing Finance Agency' s Community Homeownership Impact Fund
income limits for the 11 County Twin Cities Metro Area are also a priority of the Home Ownership
Program for Equity.
Recommended Action
Motion to Adopt Resolution 23-058 Authorizing Transfer of 1605 Douglas Drive North to the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Motion to Adopt Resolution 23-059 Authorizing Transfer of 47XX Circle Down to the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority
Motion to Adopt Resolution 23-060 Authorizing Transfer of 208 Meander Road to the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority
Supporting Documents
Resolution No. 23-058 Transfer 1605 Douglas Dr N to HRA
Resolution No. 23-059 Transfer 47XX Circle Down to HRA
Resolution No. 23-060 Transfer 208 Meander Rd to HRA
244
RESOLUTION NO. 23-058
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT
1605 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTH TO THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley (the “City”) recognizes that its current
housing environment severely underprovides affordable options, both in regard to rental
and homeownership housing;
WHEREAS,a shortage of quality affordable housing is not only damaging to the
economic prosperity of the City and surrounding region, but actively restricts low-to-
moderate income households from choosing to live in Golden Valley;
WHEREAS,in addition, high housing costs contribute to both the historical and
ongoing disparities in homeownership rates within the City, gatekeeping this key
economic opportunity from those who might benefit from it the most;
WHEREAS,addressing the affordable housing homeownership gap, through all
means available, is one of the City’s most expedient means of making itself a supportive
and united community, strengthened by the diversity of its residents;
WHEREAS,in recognition of the shortage of affordable homeownership housing,
the City encourages the use of vacant, unused parcels of land located within and owned
by the City or the HRA for the development of affordable homeownership housing;
WHEREAS,affordable housing needs and opportunities shall be considered
before surplusing public lands for other purposes that are non-essential to local
government operation;
WHEREAS, the Golden Valley City Council enacted Ordinance No. 727 Amending
the City Code, Chapter 2 – Administration to Establish a New Ordinance to Prioritize
Surplus Public Land for Affordable Housing on December 21, 2021;
WHEREAS,in response to the City’s enactment of Ordinance No. 727 to Prioritize
Surplus Public Land for Affordable Housing, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
approved the Home Ownership Program for Equity and authorized the release of a
Request for Qualifications process on June 21, 2022, and approved qualified developers
on August 16, 2022;
WHEREAS, the City and the HRA desire to develop certain real property
pursuant to and in furtherance of the Home Ownership Program for Equity, said real
property being described as follows: Address 1605 Douglas Drive North and Legal
Description attached as Exhibit A; and,
245
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Golden Valley:
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota
municipal corporation hereby resolves to convey and quit claim to the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Golden Valley, a body corporate and politic
under the laws of the State of Minnesota, real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota,
legally described on the attached Exhibit A.
Adopted by the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 5th day of July 2023.
____________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk
246
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 1 and 2, Belmont, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
(Abstract Property)
247
RESOLUTION NO. 23-059
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT
47XX/4707 CIRCLE DOWN TO THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
WHEREAS,the City of Golden Valley (the “City”) recognizes that its current housing
environment severely underprovides affordable options, both in regard to rental and
homeownership housing;
WHEREAS,a shortage of quality affordable housing is not only damaging to the
economic prosperity of the City and surrounding region, but actively restricts low-to-
moderate income households from choosing to live in Golden Valley;
WHEREAS,in addition, high housing costs contribute to both the historical and ongoing
disparities in homeownership rates within the City, gatekeeping this key economic
opportunity from those who might benefit from it the most;
WHEREAS, addressing the affordable housing homeownership gap, through all means
available, is one of the City’s most expedient means of making itself a supportive and
united community, strengthened by the diversity of its residents;
WHEREAS, in recognition of the shortage of affordable homeownership housing, the City
encourages the use of vacant, unused parcels of land located within and owned by the
City or the HRA for the development of affordable homeownership housing;
WHEREAS,affordable housing needs and opportunities shall be considered before
surplusing public lands for other purposes that are non-essential to local government
operation;
WHEREAS, the Golden Valley City Council enacted Ordinance No. 727 Amending the
City Code, Chapter 2 – Administration to Establish a New Ordinance to Prioritize Surplus
Public Land for Affordable Housing on December 21, 2021;
WHEREAS,in response to the City’s enactment of Ordinance No. 727 to Prioritize
Surplus Public Land for Affordable Housing, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
approved the Home Ownership Program for Equity and authorized the release of a
Request for Qualifications process on June 21, 2022, and approved qualified developers
on August 16, 2022;
WHEREAS,the City and the HRA desire to develop certain real property pursuant to
and in furtherance of the Home Ownership Program for Equity, said real property being
described as follows: Address 47XX/4707 Circle Down and Legal Description attached
as Exhibit A; and,
248
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Golden Valley:
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota
municipal corporation hereby resolves to convey and quit claim to the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Golden Valley, a body corporate and politic
under the laws of the State of Minnesota, real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota,
legally described on the attached Exhibit A.
Adopted by the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 5th day of July 2023.
____________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk
249
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 2, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the
County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
(Abstract Property)
AND
That part of Tract A described below:
Tract A. Lots 1, 3, and 4, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in
the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota;
which lies northerly of Line 1 described below:
Line 1. Commencing at the east quarter corner of Section 30, Township 29 North, Range 24 West;
thence westerly on an azimuth of 271 degrees 21 minutes 02 seconds along the east and west quarter
line thereof for 2652.57 feet to the center of said Section 30; thence on an azimuth of 00 degrees 21
minutes 23 seconds for 701.35 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an
azimuth of 284 degrees 30 minutes 39 seconds for 34.03 feet; thence on an azimuth of 230 degrees 05
minutes 25 seconds for 2.96 feet; thence on an azimuth of 230 degrees 01 minute 59 seconds for 14.00
feet; thence on an azimuth of 320 degrees 01 minute 50 seconds for 130.14 feet; thence on an azimuth
of 319 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds for 144.27 feet; thence on an azimuth of 320 degrees 28 minutes
03 seconds for 168.10 feet and there terminating.
(Abstract Property)
250
RESOLUTION NO. 23-060
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT
208 MEANDER ROAD TO THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS,the City of Golden Valley (the “City”) recognizes that its current housing
environment severely underprovides affordable options, both in regard to rental and
homeownership housing;
WHEREAS,a shortage of quality affordable housing is not only damaging to the
economic prosperity of the City and surrounding region, but actively restricts low-to-
moderate income households from choosing to live in Golden Valley;
WHEREAS,in addition, high housing costs contribute to both the historical and ongoing
disparities in homeownership rates within the City, gatekeeping this key economic
opportunity from those who might benefit from it the most;
WHEREAS, addressing the affordable housing homeownership gap, through all means
available, is one of the City’s most expedient means of making itself a supportive and
united community, strengthened by the diversity of its residents;
WHEREAS, in recognition of the shortage of affordable homeownership housing, the City
encourages the use of vacant, unused parcels of land located within and owned by the
City or the HRA for the development of affordable homeownership housing;
WHEREAS,affordable housing needs and opportunities shall be considered before
surplusing public lands for other purposes that are non-essential to local government
operation;
WHEREAS,the Golden Valley City Council enacted Ordinance No. 727 Amending the
City Code, Chapter 2 – Administration to Establish a New Ordinance to Prioritize Surplus
Public Land for Affordable Housing on December 21, 2021;
WHEREAS, in response to the City’s enactment of Ordinance No. 727 to Prioritize
Surplus Public Land for Affordable Housing, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
approved the Home Ownership Program for Equity and authorized the release of a
Request for Qualifications process on June 21, 2022, and approved qualified developers
on August 16, 2022;
WHEREAS,the City and the HRA desire to develop certain real property pursuant to
and in furtherance of the Home Ownership Program for Equity, said real property being
described as follows: Address 208 Meander Road and Legal Description attached as
Exhibit A; and,
251
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Golden Valley:
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota
municipal corporation hereby resolves to convey and quit claim to the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Golden Valley, a body corporate and politic
under the laws of the State of Minnesota, real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota,
legally described on the attached Exhibit A.
Adopted by the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 5th day of July 2023.
____________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk
252
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The North 158.8 feet of Lot 4, Block 3, Tralee, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
Being Registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 434516 and 434517.
253
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Administrative Services
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
3F. Adopt Resolution No. 23-061 - Reimbursement Agreement for the Remote Fire Station
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
The following resolution will allow the city to be reimbursed for expenditures related to the Remote
Fire Station that would not be covered by the Local State Appropriation. This reimbursement
agreement will allow the City to make expenditures for this project and then be reimbursed State
Appropriations with shared costs and any remainder needs paid for by bond proceeds. The set sale
time will be after the construction bids are received for the project.
Financial or Budget Considerations
The consideration of this agenda item will allow bond proceeds to pay for any allowed expenditure for
the Remote Fire Station.
Legal Considerations
The reimbursement agreement follows Internal Revenue Code to be able to reimburse the city any
expenditures before the bonds are sold.
Equity Considerations
N/A
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 23-061 Relating to the Financing of City’s Remote Fire Station;
Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Regulations under the Internal Revenue Code.
Supporting Documents
Resolution No. 23-061 Declaring Official Intent - Reimburse Capital Expenditures of Project
254
GL135-49-867656.v1 1
RESOLUTION NO. 23-061
RESOLUTION RELATING TO DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT TO
REIMBURSE CERTAIN CAPITAL EXPENDITURES OF A PROJECT
FROM THE PROCEEDS OF TAX-EXEMPT BONDS AND ESTABLISHING
COMPLIANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER
THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued Treasury Regulations,
Section 1.150-2 (the “Reimbursement Regulations”) under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the “Code”), providing that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to
reimburse prior capital expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements
are met; and
WHEREAS,the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, a municipal corporation and a
political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (the “City”), expects to incur certain
expenditures that may be financed temporarily from sources other than tax-exempt bonds,
and later reimbursed from the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds; and
WHEREAS,the City has determined to make a declaration of its official intent (the
“Declaration”) to reimburse certain capital costs from the proceeds derived from the sale of
tax-exempt bonds issued by the City or another political subdivision in accordance with the
Reimbursement Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
1.The City proposes to acquire, construct and equip a fire station public safety
project (the “Project”).
2.The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures made for certain
costs of the Project from the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds in a principal amount currently
estimated not to exceed $20,000,000. All reimbursed expenditures related to the Project
will be capital expenditures, costs of issuance of the tax-exempt bonds or other expenditures
eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Reimbursement Regulations.
3.This Declaration has been made not later than 60 days after payment of any
original expenditure to be subject to a reimbursement allocation with respect to the proceeds
of tax-exempt bonds, except for the following expenditures: (a) costs of issuance of tax-
exempt bonds; (b) costs in an amount not in excess of the lesser of $100,000 or 5% of the
proceeds of the tax-exempt bonds; or (c) “preliminary expenditures” up to an amount not in
excess of 20% of the aggregate issue price of the tax-exempt bonds that are reasonably
expected by the City to finance the Project. The term “preliminary expenditures” includes
architectural, engineering, surveying, soil testing, bond issuance and similar costs that are
incurred prior to commencement of acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of the Project,
255
GL135-49-867656.v1 2
excluding land acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs incident to commencement of
construction.
4.A reimbursement allocation with respect to tax-exempt bonds will be made
not later than 18 months after the later of: (i) the date the original expenditure is paid; or
(ii) the date the Project is placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than 3 years
after the original expenditure.
5.This Declaration is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the City
based on the facts and circumstances known to the City as of the date hereof. The
anticipated original expenditures for the Project and the principal amount of the tax-exempt
bonds described in paragraph 2 are consistent with the City’s budgetary and financial
circumstances. No sources other than proceeds of tax-exempt bonds are reasonably
expected to be reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to
the City’s budget or financial policies to pay such expenditures for which bonds are issued.
6.The action is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes
of the Reimbursement Regulations.
Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 5th day of July, 2023.
______________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
256
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Human Resources
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
3G. Adopt Resolution No. 23-062 Approving Amendment to Compensation and Classification Tables
Prepared By
Kirsten Santelices, Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director
Summary
City leadership across multiple departments continue to regularly review current positions to ensure
that job descriptions are updated and new positions are added to enhance operational efficiencies.
Over the last several months City staff reviewed and updated three positions within the City, which
resulted in a reclassification.
The Fire department updated the Fire Inspector I and II positions and the Community Development
Director updated the Planning Manager position to reflect the increased responsibilities and oversight
of the Environmental team and the GIS position. The Planning division updates were effective May 22,
2023, therefore staff propose the Planning Manager reclassification be retroactive to May 22, 2023.
The City continues to use David Drown and Associates to grade and classify positions.
Financial or Budget Considerations
The budget impact will be absorbed into the City's 2023 general fund budget.
Legal Considerations
The City contracts with DDA to grade all of the positions and ensure compliance with applicable
Minnesota Local Government Pay Equity laws.
Equity Considerations
This reclassification aligns with the City's equity pillar: Economic Prosperity for All.
Recommended Action
Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 23-061 Approving Amendment to Compensation and Classification
Tables.
Supporting Documents
Resolution No. 23-062 Comp Study Update
257
RESOLUTION NO. 23-062
RESOLUTION APPROVING IMPLEMENTATION
OF 2020 COMPENSATION STUDY AND
ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION GRID
AND CLASSIFICATION TABLE
WHEREAS, in 2020, the City conducted a full compensation and classification study
(the “Study”) to ensure the City is paying competitive and fair wages to its employees; and
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2020, the City Council approved implementation of
the Study; and adopted the compensation grid for the City:
WHEREAS,on December 15, 2020, the City also adopted a Classification Table
that assigned a grade to each position within the City; and
WHEREAS, positions are routinely reviewed and reclassified according to position
responsibilities; and the Council approved changes to the classification table by Resolution
21-13 on March 16, 2021; and by Resolution 21-38 on May 18, 2021; and by Resolution
21-114 on December 21, 2021, and by Resolution 22-048 on May 3, 2022, and by
Resolution 22-120 on December 20, 2022; and by Resolution 23-007 on April 4, 2023; and
WHEREAS, in alignment with the City’s values of communication and accountability,
it is the City’s practice for the City Council to review and adopt the Compensation Grid and
Classification Table annually.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden
Valley, Minnesota, that:
1. The City hereby adopts the following 2023 Full-Time & Part-Time Regular
Compensation Grid effective January 1, 2023:
Grade
Compensation Grid
4.90%4.90%4.90%4.90%4.90%4.90%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 $19.81 $20.78 $21.79 $22.87 $23.99 $25.16 $26.39
2 $20.99 $22.02 $23.10 $24.24 $25.42 $26.67 $27.96
3 $22.25 $23.34 $24.48 $25.68 $26.93 $28.26 $29.64
4 $23.59 $24.74 $25.96 $27.22 $28.56 $29.95 $31.43
5 $25.24 $26.47 $27.77 $29.14 $30.56 $32.05 $33.62
6 $27.00 $28.33 $29.72 $31.17 $32.69 $34.30 $35.98
7 $28.35 $29.74 $31.19 $32.72 $34.33 $36.01 $37.78
8 $29.48 $30.93 $32.45 $34.03 $35.70 $37.45 $39.28
9 $30.67 $32.18 $33.75 $35.40 $37.14 $38.95 $40.86
10 $32.20 $33.77 $35.43 $37.16 $38.99 $40.90 $42.90
11 $36.39 $38.17 $40.05 $42.00 $44.06 $46.23 $48.48
258
12 $38.56 $40.46 $42.44 $44.52 $46.70 $48.99 $51.39
13 $40.50 $42.48 $44.56 $46.74 $49.04 $51.44 $53.96
14 $42.12 $44.18 $46.35 $48.62 $51.00 $53.50 $56.12
15 $44.22 $46.38 $48.66 $51.05 $53.54 $56.17 $58.93
16 $46.88 $49.17 $51.57 $54.11 $56.75 $59.53 $62.67
17 $49.70 $52.13 $54.68 $57.36 $60.17 $63.12 $66.21
18 $54.16 $56.81 $59.60 $62.52 $65.58 $68.79 $72.16
19 $56.87 $59.65 $62.57 $65.64 $68.86 $72.23 $75.77
20 $59.71 $62.63 $65.70 $68.92 $72.30 $75.84 $79.56
21 $62.70 $65.78 $68.99 $72.38 $75.92 $79.64 $83.53
22 $66.46 $69.71 $73.13 $76.71 $80.47 $84.41 $88.55
23 $70.44 $73.89 $77.52 $81.32 $85.29 $89.48 $93.86
2. The City hereby adopts the following updated Full-Time & Part-Time Regular
Classification Table:
Grade Positions
1
2 Guest Services Specialist
3 Administrative Assistant – Fire Department
Brookview Events Coordinator
Community Service Officer
Police Department Office Assistant
Recreation Coordinator
4 Administrative Assistant – Inspections
Administrative Assistant – Parks And
Recreation
Engineering Assistant
Inspections & Development Assistant
Lead Community Service Officer
Lead Cook
Turf Maintenance Assistant
5 Accounting Technician
Assessments/Accounts Payable Technician
Motor Vehicle License Clerk
Planning Assistant
Police Assistant
Public Works Assistant
259
6 Facilities Maintenance Specialist
Executive Assistant - City Manager’s Office
Inspections Administrative Specialist
Community Development Assistant/Deputy
City Clerk
Utility Billing Specialist
7 Golf Operations Coordinator
Maintenance Worker/Mechanic
Park Maintenance Worker
Restaurant & Catering Coordinator
Street Maintenance Worker
Sustainability Specialist
Turf Equip Technician /Mechanic
Utilities Maintenance Worker
Web/Graphic Designer
8 Communications Specialist
Community Connections and Outreach
Specialist
Executive Chef
Information Technology Technician
Public Works Inspector
Utilities Specialist
Vehicle Maintenance Worker/Mechanic
9 City Forester
Engineering Technician II
Police Investigator – Non-Sworn
Park Maintenance Field Supervisor
Street Maintenance Field Supervisor
Utilities Maintenance Field Supervisor
Vehicle Maintenance Field Supervisor
Water Distribution Specialist
10 Assistant Golf Operations Manager
Engineering Technician III
Fire Inspector I
GIS Specialist
Planner
Police Support Services Supervisor
Water and Natural Resources Specialist
260
11 Accountant
Building Inspector
Crime Analyst Supervisor
Deputy Registrar Supervisor
Fire Inspector II
Greens & Turf Specialist
Human Resources Generalist
Information Technology Specialist
Patrol Officer
Payroll Accountant
Recreation & Facilities Supervisor
Recreation Supervisor
12 Deputy Fire Marshal
Golf Maintenance Supervisor
Restaurant & Catering Manager
13 City Clerk
Equity and Inclusion Manager
14 Accounting Supervisor
Assistant City Engineer
Environmental Resources Supervisor
Golf Operations Manager
Park Superintendent
Street And Vehicle Maintenance
Superintendent
Utilities Superintendent
15 Assistant Fire Chief
Building Official
Sergeant
16 Housing and Economic Development
Manager Information Technology Manager
17 Planning Manager
Police Lieutenant
18 City Engineer
Communications Director
Assistant Police Chief
19 Community Development Director
Finance Director
Fire Chief
Parks & Recreation Director
Public Works Director
20
21 City Attorney
Deputy City Manager/Human Resources
Director
Police Chief
22
23 City Manager
261
3. The City hereby adopts the following 2023 Seasonal, Variable Hour, Temporary and
Intern Positions Compensation Grid, effective March 1, 2023:
Steps 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Grade
1 $11.81 $12.42 $13.01 0 0 0 0
2 $12.63 $13.28 $13.92 $14.57 $15.20 $15.84 $16.30
3 $13.16 $13.82 $14.48 $15.18 $15.84 $16.51 $16.96
4 $13.63 $14.45 $15.16 $15.85 $16.57 $17.27 $17.73
5 $13.87 $14.98 $15.71 $16.45 $17.18 $17.98 $18.46
6 $15.10 $15.53 $16.77 $17.33 $18.07 $18.97 $19.44
7 $17.72 $18.54 $19.26 $19.96 $20.75 $21.51 $21.98
4. The City hereby adopts the following 2023 Seasonal, Variable Hour, Temporary and
Intern Positions Classification Table:
Grade Position
1 Starter/Ranger
Warming House
2 316 Restaurant Positions:
Bartender
Server
Dishwasher/Bar‐Back
Election Judge (Step 6)
Indoor Playground Attendant
Park & Reaction Seasonal
Athletics:
Playground Leader
Field Attendant
Sports Instructor
Golf Operations:
Beverage Cart Attendant
Par 3 Cashier
Range Supervisor
3 Election Captain (Step 6)
Pro Shop Cashier
4 Community Center Attendant
Golf Maintenance Operator
Parks and Recreation Program
Specialist
5 Golf Office Assistant
Pathways Intern
6 Community Health Worker Intern
Golf Maintenance Technician
Lead Pro Shop Cashier
262
Park and Recreation Intern
Seasonal Public Works Worker
7 Assistant Senior Program
Coordinator
Banquet and Restaurant Staff
Coordinator
Cook
Community Development Intern
Elections Assistant
Engineering Intern
Golf Staff Coordinator
Guest Services Lead
Human Resources Assistant
Water Resources Intern
5. The City hereby adopts the following paid on-call firefighter compensation, effective
January 1, 2023:
Battalion Chief $25.34 Per
Hour
Captain $23.47 Per
Hour
Lieutenant $21.77 Per
Hour
Firefighter $18.91 Per
Hour
Firefighter-Apprentice $16.07 Per
Hour
Firefighter in Training $12.93 Per
Hour
6. The Council shall approve all classification changes that increase the budget.
Changes to job title and other modifications that do not increase the budget shall not
require Council approval. The most current Job Classification Grid shall be kept on
file with the Human Resources Department.
Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 5th day of July 2023.
______________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
263
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Community Development
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
4A. Adopt Ordinance No. 765 Approving Zoning Map Amendment for 208 Meander Road
Prepared By
Myles Campbell, Planner
Summary
208 Meander Road is an undeveloped property located in a residential neighborhood north of
Glenwood Ave and west of Xenia Ave N. The property is zoned Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas,
and is guided in the future land use plan for Low Density Residential. The property is currently owned
by the City of Golden Valley, which has targeted the property for potential redevelopment as part of
its Homeownership Program for Equity (HOPE). The site has not been identified as an asset for
expansion in the City's system of parks or natural resource areas. In March of 2022, the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA) designated this location as suitable for development and to be
included in the first round of HOPE. For full details on the site, as well as staff's analysis in regards to
the rezoning refer to the attached memo to the Planning Commission from their meeting on June
12th.
The Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend denial of the change in zoning. While they felt that
the site and surrounding neighborhood was suitable for single-family zoning, they wanted to have
more information available to evaluate whether or not the lot could be built on and if the builder
anticipated the need for a variance. Multiple community members also made public comments on the
topic. Most questioned the viability of the site for a home, and asked whether the site could be better
utilized as parkland. For more details on the meeting's discussion, see the attached meeting minutes.
Given concerns from neighbors and the Planning Commission, following that meeting staff reached
out to Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC), the development partner selected for this
property. GMHC drafted a preliminary site plan using one of their typical model homes to show how it
may lay out on the site and to demonstrate any need for potential variances. That site plan is attached
with this executive summary, and shows a potential reduction in the front setback of 6.5 feet, bringing
the required 35 foot front setback to 28.5 feet and leaving roughly 53.5 feet of front yard between the
home and the back of curb. Its worth noting this is not a final design and that this zoning amendment
is not an approval of a specific variance. That said, staff recognizes in this site unique aspects which
typically support a variance roughly at this scale and only impacting the front setback.
Given the previous findings provided to the Planning Commission, and that the parcel is buildable in
staff's opinion, staff remains supportive of amending the zoning map for this parcel to allow for
264
construction of a single-family home.
Financial or Budget Considerations
The goal of the HOPE program is to transfer this land to a partner organization to develop as housing,
and as such the city would not make any significant profit from selling the land.
Legal Considerations
The City Council is given broad latitude in evaluating a rezoning request, but must make findings either
in support of the action or against it.
Equity Considerations
HOPE seeks to develop this parcel as an affordable home through its building partners as well as the
local land trust group, Homes Within Reach. The home would be targeted to a household making 60-
80% of Area Median Income.
Recommended Action
Motion to Adopt Ordinance No. 765 Approving Zoning Map Amendment for 208 Meander Road.
Supporting Documents
Memo to Planning Commission 6/12/23
Planning Commission Minutes 6/12/23 DRAFT
City Zoning Map
Preliminary Site Map
Proposed GMHC Site Plan
Proposed Elevation/Floorplan
Ordinance No. 765 Zoning Map Amendment HOPE 208 Meander Road.
265
1
Date: June 9, 2023
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Myles Campbell, Planner
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment – 208 Meander Road
Property address: 208 Meander Road
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Property owner: City of Golden Valley
Current use: Vacant Open Space Lot size: 13,604 sq.ft.
Guided Land Use: Low Density Residential Zoning: Institutional – Parks & Natural Areas
Adjacent uses: Single‐family Residential (North, West, South), Railroad ROW (East)
2021 aerial photo (Hennepin County)
266
2
Summary & Background
208 Meander Road is an undeveloped property located in a residential neighborhood north of
Glenwood Ave and west of Xenia Ave N. The property is zoned Institutional ‐ Parks and Natural
Areas, and is guided in the future land use plan for Low Density Residential.
The property is currently owned by the City of Golden Valley, which has targeted the property
for potential redevelopment as part of its Homeownership Program for Equity (HOPE). HOPE is
focused on creating new homeownerhip opportunities for households making household
making 60‐80% of Area Median Income (AMI) who would normally be priced out of Golden
Valley. The City has selected a development partner, Greater Metropolitan Housing
Corporation, who would build a new single‐family home at the site.
The property is a little over 13,600 square feet in total area and is of an irregular shape, 80 feet
in depth on the north side and 110 feet on its south. The front lot line is curved to follow
Meander Road, and to the rear of the property is a portion of track for the Soo Line Railroad.
Also to the rear is a large overhead utility line owned by Xcel Energy, a portion of which does
cross into 208 Meander’s property boundary, and for which there is a private easement to
ensure access for Xcel. Previously the lot had included a curb cut and paved driveway towards
the south end of the property but this was removed prior to 2012.
Based on review of City records, the property has been zoned as an open space parcel going
back to at least 1973, which was when the city acquired the property through tax forfeiture.
Prior to this it had been guided for residential development after being platted in 1939 as a part
of the Tralee Addition. From the mid‐1970’s to the turn of the century this property and the
two to the north of it on Meander were zoned for Institutional uses, with the two other
properties for a time being part of the Perpich Center Planned Unit Development (then the
Minnesota Center for Arts Education). These were rezoned to R‐1, Single‐Family Residential, in
2008, leaving 208 Meander as the last non‐residential parcel in the local neighborhood, with
the exception of Paisley Park, a pocket park just to the west.
Proposal
The zoning request would change the designated zoning from Institutional ‐ Parks and Natural
Areas (I‐P) to Single‐Family Residential (R‐1).
Rezoning Analysis
Golden Valley’s zoning code does not set hard standards against which to evaluate a rezoning,
instead Planning Commission and City Council are given broader latitude in deciding if the
request is consistent with the broader zoning map for the city. In making a determination, the
City should take into account the purpose of zoning as outlined in the City code, which is “to
regulate land use within the City, including the location, size, use, and height of buildings, the
arrangement of buildings on lots, and the density of population within the City for the purpose
of promoting the health, safety, order, convenience, and general welfare of all citizens of the
City.” (Sec. 113‐2)
267
3
Zoning District Purpose and Uses
The rezoning request seeks to change the property’s zoning from I‐P to R‐1, the purpose
statements for each are below:
Institutional Zoning
The purpose of the Institutional Zoning District is to establish areas where both
public and private institutional uses such as schools, hospitals, parks, golf
courses, nursing homes, and public buildings may be located.
Single‐Family Residential Zoning
The purpose of the Single‐Family Residential (R‐1) Zoning District is to provide for
detached single‐family dwelling units at a low density along with directly related and
complementary uses.
In term of allowed land uses, both districts are narrowly defined in what is permitted or
permitted with a conditional use permit. For I‐P, permitted uses include:
‐ Parks & playgrounds
‐ Golf courses, country clubs, and other recreational facilities
For R‐1, permitted uses include:
‐ Single‐Family Dwellings
‐ Foster Family Homes
‐ Residential Facilities serving six or fewer persons
Additionally, with a conditional use permit (CUP), a larger residential facility of up to 25 persons
could be allowed, as well as group family foster homes.
In examining the allowed uses, staff feels these are in support of the rezoning. The City parks
plan does not call for or anticipate converting this property into an actual City park to match its
zoning. The local neighborhood is currently served by a pocket park to the west, Paisley Park.
On the flip side, the property was originally platted as part of a single‐family subdivision. Given
its dimensions, and City control over the transfer of the property, staff believe it is unlikely to
ever be considered for any heavier uses that require a CUP, and is instead best suited as a
single‐family home.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area
Another important consideration is whether the rezoning would be compatible with surrounding
uses. In large part this property is surrounded by its neighborhood of low‐density single‐family
homes. The majority were built between 1950‐1970, but with some more recent cases of infill
redevelopment and subdivision of larger parcels. To the east is a stretch of railroad now used by
Canadian Pacific. These are not zoned, given that their use is solely as railroad right‐of‐way.
Approximately 10 trains per week use this stretch of track just to the east. The lower frequency of
268
4
trains and the existing residential properties on both sides of the rail lines lead staff to feel
comfortable supporting this property for rezoning and redevelopment.
Consistency with Principles, Goals, and Objectives
Finally, it is important to consider how this rezoning aligns with the City’s long‐term goals and
objectives, such as those set out in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 208 Meander Rd was guided
in the City’s future land use map for Low Density Residential, and as such this rezoning would
bring the two designations into better conformance. In addition, given the City’s goal of
developing the lot into affordable housing as part of the HOPE program, the following goals and
objectives from the Comprehensive Plan are also relevant.
Housing Goal 3: Increase Housing Affordability ‐ Increase housing opportunities at a cost that
low‐ and moderate‐income households can afford without compromising their ability to pay for
other essential needs
Objectives
‐ Support the production of new, high‐quality, affordable housing in the City
‐ Identify sites in Golden Valley and adopt land use policies that enable the City to meet
the Metropolitan Council’s affordable housing allocation requirement
‐ Support long‐term affordability of single‐family homes through home ownership
programs and the community land trust model
269
5
Land Use Goal 3: Promote High‐Quality Development ‐ Ensure new development meets high
construction and visual quality standards and includes measures of sustainability
Objectives
‐ Encourage developments to respect their surroundings
‐ Recognize and support development patterns that acknowledge the character of
suburban neighborhoods
Land Use Goal 4: Prepare For Targeted Redevelopment ‐ Use public and private redevelopment
opportunities to advance the City’s Future Land Use Map and policies
Staff Findings
In order to provide support for the recommendation below, staff is offering the following
findings of fact related to rezoning the proposed parcel to R‐1, Single‐Family Residential.
‐ City would benefit from utilizing the property for affordable single‐family home as part
of HOPE.
‐ The proposed zoning of R‐1 returns the parcel to a residential use similar to when it was
originally platted.
‐ The proposed zoning would match the guided land use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan
as well as that of surrounding properties.
‐ Utilizing the site for affordable housing is in line with a number of goals and objectives
from the Comprehensive Plan.
‐ The parcel is not planned to be utilized as parkland in the City’s long‐term plans and has
no other role in providing governmental services.
Recommendation
Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Zoning Map,
changing the zoning for 208 Meander Road from Institutional ‐ Parks and Natural Areas (I‐P) to
Single‐Family Residential (R‐1).
Attachments
City Zoning Map (1 page)
Site Map (1 page)
270
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES DRAFT
This meeting was conducted in a hybrid format with in-person and remote options for attending,
participating, and commenting. The City used Webex to conduct this meeting and members of the
public were able to monitor the meetings by watching it on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming it
on CCXmedia.org, or by dialing in to the public call-in line.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm by Chair Brookins.
Roll Call
Commissioners present: A. Brookins, M. McCormick, M. Ruby, C. Segelbaum
Commissioners absent:
Staff present: Jason Zimmerman – Planning Manager, Myles Campbell – Planner
Council Liaison: Denise La Mere-Anderson
2. Land Acknowledgement
3. Approval of Agenda
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to approve the
agenda of June 12, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
4. Approval of Minutes
May 8, 2023, Regular Meeting
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to approve the
minutes of May 8, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
May 22, 2023, Regular Meeting
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to approve the
minutes of May 22, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
5. Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment
Address: 208 Meander Road
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
Council Chambers
Hybrid
271
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
2
Myles Campbell, Planner, started with a summary of the request from the City. The City is seeking
the rezoning of an existing vacant parcel of land in order to redevelop the property into a single -
family lot as part of its Homeownership Program for Equity (HOPE).
The lot was originally platted in 1939 and was intended for a single-family home development. The
lot has been zoned differently since then, is an irregular shape, and to the rear is a railroad right of
way. In 2022 Council identified this and two other properties for the first round of HOPE. Staff would
like to rezone this lot from its existing Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas (I-P) to Single-Family
Residential (R-1).
Rezoning Analysis
Zoning Code gives broad latitude to Planning Commission and Council to determin e if a zoning map
amendment is consistent with the purpose of the zoning code, adjacent uses, and the City’s
Comprehensive Plan. Staff compared the two zoning districts and elaborated on discussions held
with Parks and Rec that this lot was not part of the park system nor was it intended to be. Most
homes in the surrounding area are single-family homes and even though there is a railroad nearby,
there are many homes on both sides of the tracks.
As part of the Land Use Plan for the City, this parcel was gu ided for future use as “Low Density
Residential” and as such rezoning the property would bring the current and planned land uses into
better conformance. HOPE was created in part due to the recognition in the Housing Chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan that the City lacked quality affordable housing options and given the Twin Cities
Metro-wide gap in homeownership between white and BIPOC households. Staff continued on to
explain how this request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the comp plan.
Staff Findings
• City would benefit from utilizing the property for affordable single -family home as part of
HOPE.
• The proposed zoning of R-1 returns the parcel to a residential use similar to when it was
originally platted.
• The proposed zoning would match the guided land use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as well
as that of surrounding properties.
• Utilizing the site for affordable housing is in line with a number of goals and objectives from the
Comprehensive Plan.
• The parcel is not planned to be utilized as parkland in the City’s long-term plans and has no
other role in providing governmental services.
Recommended Action
Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Zoning Map,
changing the zoning for 208 Meander Road from Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas (I-P) to
Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Commissioner Ruby asked if a new build would impact the electrical lines and staff stated it’s
unlikely as the easement is 10ft wide and the home can’t be built in an easement.
272
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
3
Commissioner Segelbaum noted the request and the intention to build a HOPE property, then
clarified the recommendation is on the rezoning regardless of what’s built. Staff affirmed this and
added that the City owns the lot and would need to approve anything built on it and the HOPE build
is the intention. The conversation continued around buildability, setbacks, and rezoning.
Chair Brookins opened the public hearing at 6:40.
Chair Brookins noted there were no Golden Valley Speaks comments left prior to the meeting and
that staff did not receive comments otherwise in advance.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
Melissa Caulfield
4720 Circle Downs
There was a point on the presentation where staff said the City will benefit from this project and I’d
like clarification on that. Additionally, a comment was made about “working around the railroad
tracks” and the area being undesirable and working around that, I’d like to know how that happens.
Linda Gieser
5924 Glenwood
When I moved here 20 years ago, I did so because of the greenspace. 13 houses were built in this
neighborhood since I moved in, there’s little greenspace aside from yards. I don’t under stand selling
this lot and if it was a part of my own property, is it big enough to sell to a builder. It seems like the
building envelope is tricky to meet. I understand affordable housing, I was a single mom and
struggled for the first 40 years of my life. I understand not being able to afford someplace that is nice
but it’s possible if you work hard. I don’t object to helping others, but I think putting them on that
plot of land, one that doesn’t seem desirable to build a house, doesn’t help them or the
neighborhood. I’m also wondering why the newsletter of the month said they were breaking ground
in July if this hasn’t been approved yet.
Mark Westby
204 Meander Road
I live next door to this property, on the south side. I think the current zoning does a lign with the
intended use for this property. The Golden Valley speaks presentation noted that Parks and Rec said
this area acted more as an “open space” and there are several other open spaces and nature areas in
the City that share the I-P zoning code. It would be inappropriate to compare these properties to the
intended R-1 zoning code, it’s absurd to say they can’t fit a golf course on the property so it shouldn’t
be designated I-P. These open spaces are an integral part to our City’s 2040 comp plan, it emphasizes
Golden Valley’s commitment to preserving parks and nature areas. Goal 5 of the Land Use Chapter
focuses on environmental protection and aims to preserve and enhance land that supports existing
trees and plants. The implementation action plan further highlights the prioritization of natural
resources enhancement and protection through the use of inventory of remnant parcels. The project
HOPE documentation states that the preparation on meander would require the removal of a
substantial number of trees and shrubs. Moreover, the two lots north of 208 Meander, used to be a
part of the same natural space and they have been renovated and rezoned within the last 10 years.
273
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
4
The City has already decimated the natural spaces in our area. Suggesting that the Parks Department
lacks plans to create a park justifies this development is disingenuous. They haven’t maintained that
property in 50 years, I maintain the property right now and the owners of my property before me
maintained it. They maintained that lot since 1963 when the house was built and even had a shed on
208 Meander that was placed in 1963 and it stayed in place until December 2021 when we bought
the house.
You cannot build a house on this lot right now. The August 10, 2022 meeting minutes from th e HRA
work session, Cherie Shoquist noted this site would require significant variances to be developed. So
why should we rezone if this property can’t fulfill its intended use.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote callers.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 6:27pm.
Staff responded to the comments and reminded everyone the homes in the HOPE program are
targeted for folks who make 60-80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). Staff went on to stat that
specifically is a household making between 75k/year to 95k/year and the goal of this program is for
folks to gain housing who have been otherwise priced out. Golden Valley home prices have increased
and this year houses eclipsed 400k for the average cost of a single-family home in Golden Valley. This
price point is unattainable for many members of the community.
Yes, the home will be placed near the rail road tracks and there’s no way around that. Staff discussed
the easement, ROW, and there’s about 50-60ft from the railroad. Additionally, this isn’t the only
home in the City adjacent to the railroad ROW, and if the City had other properties available they
would present those options.
The July newsletter was likely referring to 1605 Douglas Drive as it did not have any entitlements to
get through first and Habitat for Humanity has targeted a July state date.
Tree mitigation was mentioned and there are a number of mature trees on the south side of the lot
and it’s also the most buildable area on the lot. There are a number of trees that could potentially be
removed or damaged during redevelopment and we would require the City’s tree mitigation
standards to be put in place. A prospective developer also mentioned adding trees along the ROW to
create a natural buffer. The goal is not to clear cut this lot and not replace trees.
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, noted an email that was forwarded from someone who spoke
regarding pollution related to being near highways and high traffic areas. He supposed the
implication is that living in these high traffic areas may not be especially healthy.
Commissioner Ruby supports HOPE, affordable housing, and his concerns about this particular lot
may not be a factor for this particular recommendation. He asked staff if that was part of the
discussion and he added if it was appropriate to request building plans to assist in a recommendatio n
to Council. Segelbaum added that there have been situations in the past where a builder offers plans
and there have been other situations where the group is to determine if the lot is buildable and
where it’s buildable. If another committee stated it would need variances, we don’t know if that’s
true. Chair Brookins noted that the lots in this neighborhood are different sizes and don’t fit the
274
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
5
current standard. It seems that most of the houses in the area would require variances if they were
built today. There’s also no way to know if this lot will require a variance.
The discussion went on to review the height requirements, building envelope, and how potential
variances could factor in.
Staff noted that if the Commission couldn’t make a recommendation, tabling would be the next
reasonable choice as there’s no way to add a condition to a zoning map amendment.
Commissioners requested a map to see the buildable area.
Staff added that during subdivisions that part of the presentation includes buildable areas; during
rezoning requests it’s less typical. In this situation it could be done since staff knows the setbacks,
and easements.
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum, moved to table this
item until later in the agenda so staff can draw up a buildable area to complete the presentation.
MOTION CARRIED
6. Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment and Future Land Use Plan Amendment
Address: 4707 Circle Downs
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Myles Campbell, Planner, summarized the three pieces to this request:
The City is seeking three related entitlements in order to redevelop a vacant portion of ROW into a
single-family lot as part of its Homeownership Program for Equity (HOPE):
1. Amend the Future Land Use Map to guide it Low Density Residential
2. Amend the Zoning Map to zone the property to Single-Family Residential (R-1)
3. Review and approve the Preliminary Plat that would create parcel boundaries through
subdivision
Staff provided a background of the area, MnDOT acquisition, easements, and the topography.
Proposal
• City Council identified this and two other properties for the first round of HOPE in late spring of
2022, the program targets City-controlled sites to develop homes affordable to households
making 60-80% AMI
• After entitlements are finalized, site would be transferred to Greater Metropolitan Housing
Corporation to be developed as a single-family home
• Redevelopment would require new utility connections to City facilities located in existing ROW
• Tree protection and replacement standards would apply for the redevel opment
• Given the existing stormwater infrastructure on-site and a desire to mitigate highway impacts,
staff expects the home would be located closer to the northeast portion of the lot
Staff Findings on Zoning and Land Use
• The proposed single-family classification is consistent with surrounding neighborhood
275
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
6
• The proposed use would help to achieve a number of goals from the Comprehensive Plan
• The parcel is no longer needed by MnDOT for highway purposes, and has no anticipated use
within city park or public works governmental services
• Utilizing the land for affordable homeownership as part of HOPE would benefit the City’s
variety of housing opportunity
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, guiding 4707
Circle Down to Low Density Residential.
Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, zoning 4707 Circle
Down to Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision and preliminary plat, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall modify the final plat to accommodate corrections form City Engineering
Staff
2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat.
Commissioner Ruby asked staff about stormwater drain and staff responded the drain would remain,
and the buildable area is still a large triangle, not impeding the easement. Staff went on to explain
city easements, private easements, and the homeowner’s property lines. Commissioner Segelbaum
noted the lot’s wooded area, and staff expanded on the tree ordinance . Chair Brookins asked about
the removal of City ROW at the rear of the property and staff responded that it was to increase the
lot size and remove ROW parcel fragments.
Chair Brookins opened the public forum at 7:32pm.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
Melissa Caulfield
4720 Circle Downs
I’ve lived across the street from this property for 30 years and that field hasn’t been touched in that
whole time. It’s disingenuous for the City to say selling this property prevents them from having to
care for it because they never have. I believe the City got this property back from DOT 5-6 years ago
and nothing has ever happened. The area along the south wall is a deer passageway so I’m not sure
what will happen to that if it all becomes private property. It feels like the City is identifying any
green space that isn’t a park and placing something on it. Just because something is a DOT remnant,
doesn’t mean it should be developed. All the vegetation you saw prevents noise and air pollution for
us and it’s not just trees. The urban report said that the effectiveness of noise barriers is up for
debate but are more effective when constructed alongside mature vegetation. Those of us in the
neighborhood know that when a tree comes down, our noise goes up and when that happens, our
property value goes down. The same report says that property values go down 4-10% the closer they
are to a freeway and I think this is hurting current owners by doing anything in that space. You can
276
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
7
talk about not disrupting the part next to the sound wall but anything in the area will be an impact.
According to the Urban Institute there should not be new construction that close to a highway for
reasons of health and home values. Their expertly sourced paper states that with every 1000ft closer
to a highway you are, there’s an 8% increase in stroke mortality and a 5% increase in heart attack,
from pollution and noise. You’re talking about a vulnerable population, families of color, that you
want to put in that house, who are already at increased risk for cardiovascular and pulmonary
disease. Of course, a family wants to take advantage of a discounted house, but at what risk to their
own health. My next-door neighbor put her house on the market last week because her realtor told
her the noise will go up and her property value will go down and she should get out while she can.
She lives in a 1.7 million historic home, she’s been there for 7 years, and it’s now for sale because of
the work of the City. I don’t think that’s the intended effect of this. Have you visited these
properties? On Meander, only a few need to be visited. If you don’t live there you don’t understand
the nuance of noise. Arguments that say this isn’t the first house by a freeway wall or railroad track
are hard to accept because we’ve learned a lot more about noise pollution in the last 30 years. Again,
you’re talking about a vulnerable population, families of color, and putting them in places that will
impact their health. I think Golden Valley can do better than that. I asked someone why we’re doing
this program on these properties and the said because it’s the cheapest. Do we always only take the
cheapest vendor bids? Do we buy the cheapest equipment and vehicles for the police department?
I’m all for diversifying Golden Valley. If a neighbor of mine sold their house and moved, maybe
there’s another program the City can participate in where they can buy that house and use if for this
purpose. I think the City has taken a short -sighted approach to these properties and not using them
well.
Mary Winter
609 Ottawa
I object to this because of what it’s going to do to my property value. The previous speaker is my
neighbor and I agree with everything they said. I want to know how many of you live next to
“affordable housing”. That’s all.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote commenters.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 7:39pm.
Commissioner Ruby asked for clarification on the request and it’s a whole recommendation, there
isn’t an ability to negotiate an aspect of the recommendation. The subdivision is happening.
Staff responded that the requirements for a subdivision were laid out in the memo and unless the
Commission found they were not met, there isn’t a negotiation. Commissioner Segelbaum added
that voting on the subdivision doesn’t occur until the rezoning is approved.
Segelbaum reminded everyone that the Commissioners are volunteers and residents of Golden
Valley, most of whom have lived in the City for a long time. He added that he understands impacts to
a neighborhood and this body’s job is to protect the interests of those coming before them and those
that are not. That consideration is weighed with the City’s interest and they are to find the balance.
Segelbaum continued that he doesn’t have concern about this property other than it is green space
277
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
8
that folks have gotten used to; he understands it’s easy to assume things will remain the sa me
indefinitely. Ultimately it is the City’s choice to do what they’d like with their property and it’s the job
of this body to determine if that use is reasonable based on the factors before them. When the
factors are applied, this meets the standards.
Chair Brookins echoed these statements. The lot is significant, it’s buildable, there are protections in
place for tree mitigation, the buildable area barely has a tree in it. Segelbaum added it’s in their best
interest to maintain trees. The discussion continued on specifics of tree mitigation.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to
recommend approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, zoning 4707 Circle Down to
Single-Family Residential (R-1).
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, guiding 4707 Circle Down to
Low Density Residential.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
approval of the minor subdivision and preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall modify the final plat to accommodate corrections form City Engineering
Staff
2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat
MOTION CARRIED
7. Informal Public Hearing – Minor Subdivision of 7324 Harold and Associated Subdivision Variance
Address: 5317 Glenwood
Applicant: Lake West Development
Myles Campbell, Planner, noted this item includes two approvals, a subdivision and a subdivision
variance. Staff noted the property’s location in the City and reviewed its current zoning. The current
home was built in 1926, on the east side of the lot, and is lower when compared to the topography of
surrounding areas. This slope adds to stormwater and runoff challenges.
The proposal is to subdivide and create two R-1 lots, the existing home would stay but be remodeled
to increase livability. A new home would be built on the other portion and subject to current zoning
standards. Both lots would exceed the area requirements for new R-1 parcels, but both fall slightly
short of the required 80’ in width, necessitating the subdivision variance .
Staff reviewed existing and proposed drainage patterns as well as lot size details.
Staff discussed the public meeting that was held in May and reviewed some of the comments. Staff
noted the subdivision requirements, other staff that was involved in the review, and the Fire
Department did not have concerns.
278
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
9
Staff continued to review the subdivision standards, the conditions, and noted that the Council and
Commission may also consider surrounding uses, resulting population density of the
subdivision/consolidation, and traffic impacts.
Recommendation
Based on the findings, staff recommends approval of a variance of 6.56 feet off the required 160 feet
to a width of 153.44 feet for the lot’s width before subdivision.
If the variance is approved, then based on the findings above staff recommends approval of the
minor subdivision at 5317 Glenwood Ave, subject to the following conditions:
1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat.
2. A park dedication fee of $5,415 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat.
If the variance is not approved, the lot width requirement cannot be met and therefore staff
recommends denial of the minor subdivision with a finding that the proposal does not meet the
Minimum Dimension Requirements of the Subdivision Code.
Chair Brookins opened the public forum at 8:02pm.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
There were no in person commenters.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote commenters.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 8:03pm.
Commissioner Ruby noted he appreciates the ability to maintain the current home, he added he’s
concerned about how approving this request may open to more requests of this nature. Ruby
asserted he’s in favor of this request. Commissioner Segelbaum noted much of the same and added
the approval should specify the circumstances that lead to approval. Chair Brookins said much of the
same and added the benefits that will come to all the neighbors by the improved drainage.
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum, to recommend
approval of a variance of 6.56 feet off the required 160 feet to a width of 153.44 feet for the lot’s
width before subdivision.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to recommend
approval of the minor subdivision at 5317 Glenwood Ave, subject to the following conditions:
1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat.
2. A park dedication fee of $5,415 shall be paid before release of the F inal Plat.
MOTION CARRIED
279
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
10
Commissioners returned to the previously tabled item, 208 Meander Road.
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, displayed an image he created to clarify the building
envelope for 208 Meander Road. Staff discussed the setbacks, the building envelope, and
superimposed other homes in the area that roughly fir within the building envelope for comparison
and clarity. Before this item goes before City Council, the image and measurements could be refined.
Chair Brookins noted that the road is offset from the ROW and that the ROW is larger than average.
He asked if BZA takes those things into account when reviewing variances. Staff asserted they do
take it into account and that Meander was likely reconstructed and there is additional boulevard
space. This particular ROW is around 20ft and the average in Golden Valley is 10 -15ft.
Commissioner Segelbaum said the building envelope is present but it feels like a stretch since the
depth is narrower. He added that until he sees the detailed envelope, he’s not sure how he can
recommend approval. Commissioner Ruby said the neighborhood is R-1 and if a house can fit there,
it makes sense. The struggle is the building envelope looks like a hallway and it’s hard to see this
development without a lot of variances. The conversation continued around the homes in the
neighborhood, variances, and current regulations.
Staff added that if this item were moved on to Council, there would be more information on the
exact envelope, a conversation with a developer could occur to understand what style of house
would meet the envelope requirements without a variance, or there would be an understanding of
what variances would necessitate a build. The conversation continued around staff’s general
recommendation and how the HOPE program factor’s in to the decision, and that this lot is
appropriate to receive an R-1 designation.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
denial of the amendment to the Zoning Map, changing the zoning for 208 Meander Road from
Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas (I-P) to Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Commissioner Segelbaum added his denial is based on his uncertainty around how realistic it is to
place a home in the building envelope.
Commissioner Ruby echoed that statement, and added that this decision isn’t based on negativity
towards the HOPE project or similar opportunities in Golden Valley.
MOTION CARRIED
– End of Televised Portion of Meeting –
8. Council Liaison Report
Council Member La Mere-Anderson let the Commission know that the off-street parking updates
had been approved by the City Council and that former Planning Commissioner Ginis has been sworn
in as a Council Member. She noted that June was proclaimed as Pride Month and that Juneteenth
280
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
11
was now a city holiday. The Douglas Drive / Highway 55 project had its groundbreaking and
interviews for new Commissioners were scheduled for July.
9. Other Business
None.
10. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned at 8:37 pm.
________________________________
________________________________ Secretary, Mary McCormick
Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant
281
M
edi
c
i
neLakeBranchIkePond
Colonial Pond
Ottawa Pond
Glen-woodPond
EgretPond
LilacPond
DuluthPond
St.CroixPond
Chicago Pond
LilacPond
Pond CTurners PondGlen 1 Pond
DuckPond
Loop EPond
Loop FPond Sweeney LakeWirth LakeTwin LakeB a s s ett C re e k
Hampshire Pond
DecolaPond A
NorthRicePond
West RingPond
Cortlawn Pond
DecolaPonds B & C
Westwood Lake
SchaperPond
SouthRicePond
East RingPond Bassett CreekDecolaPondE
DecolaPond F
BreckPond
NatchezPond
MinnaquaPond
WirthPond
Toledo/AngeloPond
HoneywellPond
StrawberryPond
DecolaPond D
Bas
s
e
tt Cr
ee
k
BassettC
r
e
e
k
Basset
t
Cr
eekBassettC r e e k
BassettC reekSweeney L akeBranchNW LoopPondBoone Avenue PondMain Stem
Pond B
Pond C
Bassett Creek NatureArea Pond
Medicine Lake
BrookviewPond A
Hidden LakesPond 1
Pond 2A
Pond 2B
Pond 3
Schaper BallfieldPond
Pond O
Pond J
Spirit of Hope Church Pond
GoldenRidgePond
Golden Meadows Pond
SoccerFieldPond
WestPond
201GeneralMillsPond
HaroldPond
Medicine Lake Road Pond
Xenia MitigationPond
10th AvePond
SpringPond
Briar-woodPond
LaurelHills Pond
JFB NWPond
LogisPond
BrownieLake
BirchPond
MinnaquaWetland
GrimesPondBassett CreekPark Pond
SweeneyLakeBranchPond M
Pond F
Pond DP
ond E
Dover HillPondLiberty BasinS w e e n e y L akeBranchBrookviewGolf Course
LionsPark
WesleyPark
Sochacki Park
SchaperPark
ScheidParkHampshirePark
MedleyPark
Briarwood
Laurel Avenue Greenbelt
Glenview TerracePark
North TyrolPark
Western AvenueMarsh
Nature
Area
GeartyPark
Sandburg AthleticFacility
NatchezPark
ValleyView ParkPennsylvaniaWoods
BassettCreekNature Area
WildwoodPark
IsaacsonPark
SouthTyrol Park
SeemanPark
AdelineNature Area
YosemitePark
StockmanPark
Golden OaksPark
St CroixPark
LakeviewPark
SweeneyPark
Perpich CenterBall Fields
Ronald B. Davis Community Center
Brookview Park
Westwood HillsNature Center (SLP)
(MPRB)
Theodore WirthRegional Park
Eloise Butler WildflowerGarden and Bird Sanctuary
Wirth LakeBeach
Golden RidgeNature Area
General Mills NaturePreserve
General Mills ResearchNature Area
BooneOpenSpace
GoldenHills Pond
MadisonPond
SouthTyrolPond
LibraryHill
IdahoWetland
GeorgiaOpen Space
ArdmoreNorth&SouthPonds
JanalynPond
MeadowPond
O p e n S p a c e
OrklaOpenSpace
PicnicPavilion
Chalet
SochackiPark (Three Rivers Park Dist.)
Bassett Valley Open Space
Byrd
BluffOpenSpace
→
FishingDock
PaisleyPark
XeniaOpenSpace
DahlbergOpenSpace
Minnaqua Greenbelt
(TRPD)
(Mpls Park & Rec Board)
Plymouth Avenue The Trailhead
456766
456770
456766
456740
456740
4567156
4567102
§¨¦394
§¨¦394
Æÿ55
Æÿ55
Æÿ100
Æÿ100
£¤169
£¤169
34th Ave N
Medicine Lake Rd
BroggerCir Knoll St Lilac Dr NLilac Dr NThotland Rd
Mendelssohn Ave NWinnetka Ave NSunnyridgeCir
Western Ave (WaterfordDr)Hillsboro Ave NZealandAve
N
Aquila Ave NOrkla DrWisconsin Ave N23rd Ave N
KalternLn
Wynnwood Rd
25th Ave N
Bies DrJonellen Ln
Sumter Ave NRhodeIslandAveNPatsy Ln Valders Ave NWinnetka Ave NDuluth St Florida Ave NSandburg Rd HeritageCirKentley Ave
Wynnwood Rd
Kenneth Way
Unity Ave NB a s s e ttC r e e k D rQuailAveNScott Ave NLilac Dr NLowry Ter
33rd Ave N
Noble Ave NCross LnQuail Ave NScott Ave NRegent Ave NToledo Ave NIndiana Ave N(BridgewaterRd)(WaterfordCt)(Hid
d
e
nLnkesPkwy)Meadow Ln NFrance Ave NTopel Rd
Unity Ave NPhoenix St
Parkview TerWelcomeAveNWelcomeC ir
W e l c o
meAveNXeniaAveNZ
a
n
e
Av
e
NLindsay St
St Croix Ave N
St Croix Ave N
Yosemite Ave NWolfberryLnBrunswick Ave NCounty Rd 102Westmore Way
Green Valley Rd
Louisiana Ave NKelly DrMaryland Ave NOlympia St
Winsdale St
Winnetka Ave NYukon CtWesleyDr Wesley Dr
Plymouth Ave N
10th Ave N
Kelly DrVarner CirPennsylvania Ave NFaribault StQuebec Ave NRhode Island Ave NPhoenix St
Knoll St
County Rd 156Jersey Ave NCountryClubDr
P h o e n ix S tDouglas DrGeorgia Ave NCou
n
ty
Rd40
Hampshire Ave NWestch esterCirJersey Ave NGardenParkQuebe
c
Av
e
SWinnetka Ave NWally St
Ensign Ave N7th Ave N
Golden Valle y Rd Decatur Ave N10th Ave N
Natchez Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Olson Memorial Hwy
Cutacross Rd
Olson Memorial Hwy
Earl St
Flag Ave NHampshire
LnJersey Ave NFloridaAveNEdgewoodAve NDouglas DrDuluth Ln
Scott Ave N
Drake Rd
Lowry Ter Kyle Ave NQuail Ave NPerry Ave NNoble Ave NCulver Rd
Dawnview Ter
Dona Ln
Noble Ave NScottAveNGl
e
ndenTer
Culver R d
Marie Ln W
Hampton Rd
RegentAveNPerryAveNLilac Dr N27th Ave N
Merribee Dr Kyle Ave NHampton RdOrchard Ave NMarie Ln E
Lee Ave NKyle Ave NDresde
n
L
n
Kewanee W
ay
26th Ave N
Me
ri
d
i
a
n
D
r
P
a
r
k
v
i
e
w
B
l
v
d Terrace LnManor DrMcNair DrByrd Ave N
B
a
s
s
ettCreekDrMaryHillsDrZenith Ave NVista DrXerxes Ave NYork Ave NS t M a rg aret D rZephyr PlXerxes Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)(SkylineDr)Spruce TrKyle PlW e s t b r o o k R d Noble Ave Frontage RdCircleDownOrchard Ave NPerryAveNWindsorWayWestbendR dUnity Ave NG reenview
LnRegent Ave NSorell Ave
Frontenac Ave Quail Ave NSt Croix Ave N
Winsdale St StCroixCirAngelo DrUnity Ave NAlfred Rd Spring Valley RdN
o
b
l
e
DrMajor DrAdeline LnAngelo DrAngelo DrWills PlToledo Ave NOttawa Ave NKillarney DrZane Ave NWoodstock A v e Woodstock Ave
Loring LnYosemiteAveN
Turners Crossroad NWestchesterCirN
F
r
ontageRdFlorida Ave NHampshire Ave NPlymouth Ave N
Idaho Ave NOlympia StHampshire Ave NArcher Ave NKelly DrPennsylvania Ave NDuluth St Xylon Ave NWisconsin Ave NSumter Ave NBoone Ave NWinsdale St
Meadow Ln N
DahlbergD r
Woodstock Ave
Poplar Dr Meadow Ln NChatelain T e r
Natchez Ave NEdgewood Ave NK i n g s t o n C i r
Glenwood Ave
Country Club DrValdersAveNOrkla DrElgin PlDecaturAveN
Indiana Ave NRoanoke CirWestern Ave Western Ave
Harold Ave
Loring Ln
WestwoodDrNArdmoreDrWinsdale St
Knoll St
Oak Grove CirDuluth St Zane Ave NDouglas Dr27th Ave N
Bonnie
Ln
Medicine Lake Rd
Madison Ave W
Nevada Ave NLouisiana Ave NCounty Rd 70
ValdersAve NValders Ave N23rd Ave N Rhode IslandAve NCounty Rd 156Medicine Lake Rd
Mendelssohn Ave NWinsdale St
St C ro ix Ave N June Ave NLegend DrLegendLn
General Mills BlvdBoone Ave NSunnyridge LnGlenwood Ave
Janalyn CirJanalyn CirGlencrest Rd Meadow Ln SWayzata BlvdWestwood Dr SWestwoodLn
StrawberryLnOttawa Ave NOttawa Ave SNatchez Ave S Tyrol Crest
SussexRdJune Ave SWayzata Blvd
FairlawnWayNatchez Ave SOttawa Ave SPrincetonAve SDouglas Ave
Circle DownTurners Crossroad SGolden Hills Dr
Laurel AveLaurel Ave
Hampshire Ave SDakota Ave SBrunswick Ave SKing Hill RdGlenwood Ave
Colonial Dr
Medicine Lake Rd
FloridaAveSAlley
Market StMarket St
Louisiana Ave SLaurel AvePennsylvania Ave SRhode Island Ave SSumter Ave SUtah Ave SGregory Rd
VermontAve SWi
sc
o
ns
i
n
AveSGeneral Mills BlvdHanley RdRidgeway Rd
Laurel Ave QubecAve S County Rd 102Nevada Ave SColonial RdLouisianaAveSKentucky Ave SJersey Ave SHeathbrookeCir
G le n w o o d P k w y
(Carriage Path)Xenia Ave SFlorida CtLilacD
r
NOlson Memorial Hwy
Schaper Rd
Lilac Dr NG o ld en V alley R dLilac Dr N(WoodlandTrail)(Wat.Dr)
BassettCreek Ln
(NobleDr)France Ave S (Mpls)N Frontage Rd
S Frontage Rd Olson Mem HwyAdair Ave NAdair Ave NWestbrookRd
34th Ave N
Mendelssohn Ave NAlley-Unimproved--Unimproved-
Wayzata Blvd
Wayzata BlvdBoone Ave NG o ld e n
V a lle y D rSchullerCirN F r o n t a g e R d
S F r o n t a g e R d
Rhode IslandAve N Pennsylvania Ave SAlley
Alley
(Private)AlleyAlleyLilac Dr NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Harold Ave WestwoodDr
N
Ardmore DrT
h
e
o
d
o
r
e
Wirt
h
P
k
w
y
Tyrol Tr(Mendelssohn Ln)AlleyS Frontage Rd
AlpinePassBren
n
e
r
PassDou g la s Ave
QuentinAveSTyrol TrailTy
r
olTr a ilSunsetRidge
Westw
oodDrS
RavineTrTyrol
Trai
l
J analyn C irMadd
usLn
MeadowLnS
AvondaleRdBurntsideDr S u nnyridgeLnBru
n
swickAveNLeberLn
C loverleafDrCloverLnCl
overleaf D
r TheodoreWirthPkwyBeverly Ave
B u rn tsideDrSpringValleyRdT
oledoAveN
Duluth
St
GoldenValle y R dSpringValleyCirC ou n ty Rd 66
(Island Dr)(IslandDr)GoldenValley
Rd
TheodoreWirthPkwyW irth P kw y
W
ay
z
a
t
aBl
vd
G le n w o o d P kwyPlymouthAve N (Mpls )ZenithAveNCrest
vi
ewA
ve
By r d A v e N
Hwy 55
Glenwood Ave
Bassett CreekDrLegend DrLeeAveNLeeAveNMajorAveNLeeAveNE l m daleRd
AdellA veM in n a quaDr M innaquaD r
ToledoAveNOrdwayMa rkayRidge Orchard Ave NN o r m a n d y P l
CherokeePlQuailAveNRegentAveNTr ito n DrT r ito n D rL o w r y Ter
3
3rd
AveN
SandburgLn Lamplighter
L
n
BrookridgeAveNValeCrestRdWinfieldAveCounty Rd 66
P
ark
Place
Blv
d
(SLP)I-394SFr o n tag e Rd (SLP )Xeni
aAveSCounty Rd 70
L ilacD rNLilacDrNLilacD
r
NConstanceDrWConstanceDrESandburg Rd
S Frontage Rd
N Frontage Rd N Frontage RdOlsonMemorialHwy
S F r o n t a g e R d
O l s o n M e m o r ia lH w y
OlsonMemorialHwy Valleywo
odCirYosemite CirLawn TerR
adisson Rd
Turnpike
RdA
lle
y
AlleyTu r npikeR
d Col
on
ial
Dr
GlenwoodAve
BrunswickAve NMeanderRd
MeanderRdIdahoAveNHaroldAve
Wayzata Blvd
I-394SFrontageRd
Edgewo
odAveSIdahoAveNCortlawnCirWCortlawn Cir S
CortlawnCirN
Dawnv i e wTerCounty Rd 70
EdgewoodAveSK in gCreekRdKentu
ckyAveNLouisianaAveNMarylandAve SRhodeIslandAveSRidgewayRdEwaldTe rWestern Ter
FieldD r Brookview Pk w y N Harold Ave
HalfMoonDr
RidgewayRdG oldenValleyR d(B a s sett Creek
Blvd)
Lewis Rd
10thAve N
EllisLnPlym outhAveN Plymouth Ave N
Faribault St
OrklaDrCastleCt Winnetka Heights D rKelly
Dr
Maryland
A
v
eNHampshire Pl
Olympia St
Oregon Ave NQuebecAveNValdersAveNOrklaDrKnoll S tWisconsin
AveNWinsdaleSt
Mandan
AveNCounty Rd 102AquilaAveNAquila
AveNZealandAveNJulianne Ter Ju lia nneTerPatsy Ln
WisconsinAveNAquilaAveNWestbend Rd
WinnetkaHeightsDr
ZealandAveNOrklaDrValdersCtValdersAve NWinnetkaHeights Dr
A q uilaAveNZealandAveNS cottAveNRose
ManorDuluthSt
Duluth St CavellAveNEnsignAveNElg in Pl
23r d Ave N
Medle y L n
(Medley Rd)
(Medley C ir)H illsboroAveN(English Cir
)(Mayf airR
d)(Kin
g
sVa l l e y Rd)(K ings
V
al
leyRdE)(KingsVall
e
yRd W )
(
S
tr
o
d
e
n
C
ir)(Tama rin Tr )
(Mar
qui
sRd)
Ski Hill
R
d MajorCirLeeAveNMajorAveNRhodeIslandAveNG o ld en V alleyR d
G o ld e n V a lle y R dG olden V alleyR d
Hwy100H
w
y
10
0Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100
H w y 3 9 4
Hwy 394 Hwy 394
Hwy 394 Hwy 394ColoradoAve NHwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Colorado Ave SGoldenHills DrPaisleyLnPaisleyLn
I-394NFrontageRd I -3 9 4 N Frontage Rd
WayzataBlvd
I-394SFrontag e R d
York
AveNValeryRdW
asatchLn
Hwy 55
Hwy 55
H w y 5 5
O l s o n M e m o r i a l H w yHwy 55
H w y 5 5
County Rd 40
County Rd 40 Glenwood A v e
CountyR d 4 0
CountyRd40
GoldenValley R d
C o u nty Rd 66ManchesterDr
County Rd 156OregonAveS24th Ave N
LilacDrNRoanokeRdLouisianaAveN
Turnpike RdLilacLoop (Sunnyridge Ln)WisconsinAveN
GettysburgCt(Laurel Pt)
(Laure lCurv)Independence Ave NGettysburg Ave NFlag Ave NWheelerBlvdAlleyNaper St
B e tty CrockerDr Decatur Ave N(WesleyCommonsDr)Winnetka Ave S Winnetka Ave SHanley RdBrookviewPkwySWayzataBlvd
I-394 S Fron t a g e R d
Olympia St
Independence Ave NHillsboro Ave NGettysburg Ave NPassG reenwayU n io n P acific Railroad
Canadian Pacific Railroad B
u
rlin
g
to
n
N
o
rt
h
e
r
n
Sant
aFeRailroadCanadianPacificRailroadC anadianP acificR ailroadC anadia n P a c i f i c R ailroad
U nion Pacific R a i l r o a d
Breck School
SandburgMiddle School
Perpich Center for Arts Education
MNDOT District Office & State Highway Patrol
NobleElementarySchool
CalvaryLutheranChurch
Speak theWord Church
10th AvenueCold Storage
School ofEngineeringand Arts
GovernmentCenter &Fire Station #1
MeadowbrookElementarySchool
King of GraceLutheranChurchand School
Churchof St.MargaretMary
Good ShepherdCatholic Church&Good ShepherdSchool
GoldenValleyLutheranChurch
Spirit ofHopeChurch
Oak Grove Church
HennepinCounty SheriffCommunications
Hennepin CountyLibrary
Fire Station#3
Valley Community Presbyterian Church
ChristianLifeCenter
UnityChristChurch
RedeemerReformedChurch
FireStation#2
Valley of PeaceLutheran Church
Golden ValleyCemetery
Golden ValleyHistoricalSociety
BrookviewCommunityCenter
Breck IceArena
WaterReservoir
U.S.Post Office
Loveworks Academy forVisual & Performing Arts
On FireMinistry
C I T Y O F N E W H O P E C I T Y O F C R Y S T A L
C I T Y O F R O B B I N S D A L E
CITY OF MINNEAPOLISC I T Y O F S T . L O U I S P A R K CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF ROBBINSDALECITY OF CRYSTAL
CITY OF CRYSTALC I T Y O F N E W H O P E
CITY OF PLYMOUTHCITY OF MINNEAPOLISC I T Y O FST. L O U I S P A R KCITY OFPLYMOUTH74
83
94
88
7
5
13
34
8
25
78
87
79
6
75
86
27
56
66
90
46
3365
71
6795
51
70
8163
53
22
93
91
76
84
3947
1-A
72
61
59
68
30-B
77
1-B
42
28
44
89 36
24
18-A
55
2658
95 26-A34
14
48
54
41
98
96
97 100
109
121
120
118
115117123
113
114
110
122
124
112
C
C B B
A
A
City of G old en Va lleyCommunity Deve lopment Department7800 Go lden Valley R oadGolden Valley, MN 554 27-458 8763-593 -8095www.g olde nvalle ymn.go v
Official Zoning Map
Zoning Districts
I:\Maps\ZoningMap.pdf
ORDINANCE NO. 244, 2ND SERIES
This is the Official Zoning Map referred to in Section 113.56 of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code of the City of Golden Valley.
Adopted this 20th day of December 2022.
59 Planned Unit Development (PUD)
See the "Official Flood Zone Profile and Map" on file with the City - The collection of floodprofiles contained in the Flood Insurance Study, Volumes 1 of 2 and 2 of 2, Hennepin County, Minnesota, all jurisdictions, dated November 4, 2016, including the Flood Insurance Rate Mapsfor the City of Golden Valley, panels 27053C0194F, 27053C0213F, 27053C0214F, 27053C0332F, 27053C0351F, 27053C0352F and 27053C0354F, dated November 4, 2016.
Flood Plain Management Zoning Overlay District
I-394 Overlay Zoning District (A, B, & C)
Shoreland Overlay District
See Section on Shoreland Managementfor setback distance from protected waters.
A
(R-1) Single-Family Residential
(R-2) Moderate Density Residential
(R-3) Medium Density Residential
(R-4) High Density Residential
(MU-E) Mixed Use Employment
(MU-N) Mixed Use Neighborhood
(MU-C) Mixed Use Community
(O) Office
(C) Commercial
(LI) Light Industrial
(I) Industrial
(I-A) Assembly: Places of Worship,Schools, Libraries, Museums,Cemeteries: Assembly
(I-C) Civic: City, County, and StateFacilities
(I-M) Medical: Convalescent Homes,Nursing Homes, Hospitals
(I-P) Parks & Natural Areas: Parks,Playgrounds, Natural Areas, GolfCourses
Not Zoned
Print Date: 3/23/2023Sources: Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines (2023). City of Golden Valley for all other layers.
0 800 1,600 2,400 3,200400Feet I
Approved Amendments
Most recent amendment: Ordinance 760 on March 21, 2023
Contact the Community Development Department at City Hall for a list of past amendments.
282
13,593 sqftMeander Rd208
204
124
0 50 10025Feet
Assigned Addr ess
208 Meander Rd
by the City of Golden Valley, 3/7/2018 I283
284
285
ORDINANCE NO. 765
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CHAPTER 113
Amending the Zoning Map and Rezoning Properties at
208 Meander Road
City of Golden Valley, Applicant
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. City Code chapter 113 entitled “Zoning” is amended in Section 113-55
Subd. (b) by changing the zoning designation of the property at 208 Meander Road from
Institutional - Parks & Natural Areas (I-P) to Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Section 2. The tracts of land affected by this ordinance are legally described as:
Lot 4, Block 3, Tralee Addition, Golden Valley, Minnesota.
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions” and Sec. 1-8 entitled
“General Penalty; Continuing Violations” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as
though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect form and after its passage and publication
as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 5th day of July 2023.
______________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk
286
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Community Development
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
4B. Public Hearing for HOPE Property at 4707 Circle Down - Ordinance No. 766 and Resolution No. 23-
063 - Zoning, Land Use, and Preliminary Plan for Subdivision
Prepared By
Myles Campbell, Planner
Summary
4707 Circle is the proposed address for an undeveloped portion of right-of-way (ROW) located in the
southwestern most portion of the North Tyrol neighborhood. The City of Golden Valley is the current
owner of this ROW and seeks to plat the land and provide it zoning and land use guidance in order to
be utilized for the construction of a single-family home in partnership with the Greater Metropolitan
Housing Corporation. Given that it is considered ROW, the land currently is unzoned and is not guided
for any particular land use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The three entitlements included under
this agenda item were all heard by the Planning Commission at their meeting on June 12th. See the
accompanying memos to the Planning Commission on more details for the existing conditions and
staff's findings.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the zoning, land use, and
subdivision items, noting that the use of the property for housing was consistent with the surrounding
neighborhood and the goals of the comprehensive plan. Multiple members of the public also spoke on
this topic and raised concerns about the loss of trees and greenspace, along with the impacts of a
home on surrounding properties. For full details on the discussion from that night, refer to the
attached meeting minutes from June 12th.
Staff will note that a previous condition of the subdivision was to provide additional corrections
following direction of City Engineering staff. Some of these modifications have been made by the land
surveyor since the Planning Commission meeting, and as such both copies are attached with this
report for comparison. Staff is still recommending that the condition of approval be maintained in case
further modifications are needed.
Financial or Budget Considerations
The goal of the HOPE program is to transfer this land to a partner organization to develop as housing,
and as such the city would not make any significant profit from selling the land.
Legal Considerations
The City Council is given broad latitude in evaluating a rezoning request, but must make findings either
287
in support of the action or against it. However, for subdivisions a strict set of findings are laid out by
code, and if met, allow for the subdivision. The City Attorney will determine prior to approval of the
Final Plat if additional title review is necessary.
Equity Considerations
HOPE seeks to develop this parcel as an affordable home through its building partners as well as the
local land trust group, Homes Within Reach. The home would be targeted to a household making 60-
80% of Area Median Income.
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution 23-063 Approving Future Land Use Map Amendment, c hanging the
land use for 4707 Circle Down to Low Density Residential, and to authorize staff to forward the
request to the Metropolitan Council for review.
Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 766 Approving Zoning Map Amendment changing the zoning for
4707 Circle Down to Single-Family Residential (R-1)
Motion to approve the proposed Preliminary Plan for Subdivision for 4707 Circle Down, subject
to the following conditions
1. The applicant shall modify the final plat to accommodate corrections from City
Engineering staff.
2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final
plat.
Supporting Documents
Planning Commission Memo 6/12/23 (Land Use & Zoning)
Planning Commission Memo 6/12/23 (Minor Subdivision)
Planning Commission Minutes 6/12/23 DRAFT
Official Zoning Map
Preliminary Plat - First Draft
Preliminary Plat - Revised
Ordinance No. 766 Zoning Map Amendment HOPE 4707 Circle Down
Resolution No. 23-063 Comp Plan Map 4707 Circle Down
288
1
Date: June 9, 2023
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Myles Campbell, Planner
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment and Future Land Use Plan
Amendment – 4707 Circle Down
Property address: 4707 Circle Down
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Property owner: City of Golden Valley
Current use: Vacant Open Space Lot size: 39,578 sq.ft.
Guided Land Use: N/A Zoning: N/A
Adjacent uses: Single‐family Residential (North, East), Highway ROW (South, West)
2021 aerial photo (Hennepin County)
289
2
Summary & Background
4707 Circle is the proposed address for an undeveloped portion of right‐of‐way(ROW) located
in the southwestern most portion of the North Tyrol neighborhood. Originally platted as a
handful of lots within the Moshou Addition in 1965, MnDOT would soon after acquire the
property for highway construction and ROW purposes. It is located east of the interchange
ramp for Interstate 394 and Highway 100. MnDOT would eventually turn back the parcel to City
of Golden Valley to manage the ROW. Given that it is considered ROW, the land currently is
unzoned and is not guided for any particular land use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
As noted, the property is currently owned by the City of Golden Valley, which has targeted the
property for potential redevelopment as part of its Homeownership Program for Equity (HOPE).
HOPE is focused on creating new homeownerhip opportunities for households making 60‐80%
of Area Median Income (AMI) who would normally be priced out of Golden Valley. The City has
selected a development partner, Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation, who would build a
new single‐family home at the site.
If platted (as described in the accompanying memo on subdivision) the property would be
39,578 square feet in total area with frontages along both Circle Down and Natchez Ave S. An
existing underground storm sewer pipe also runs through the center of the proposed property,
which along with the adjacent highway would encourage a potential home design to utilize the
northeast portion of the lot.
Proposal
For this property both the zoning map and future land use map would need to be amended.
The zoning request would change the designated zoning to Single‐Family Residential (R‐1)
The land use amendment would change the future land use to Low Density Residential
Rezoning Analysis
Golden Valley’s zoning code does not set hard standards against which to evaluate a rezoning,
instead Planning Commission and City Council are given broader latitude in deciding if the
request is consistent with the broader zoning map for the city. In making a determination, the
City should take into account the purpose of zoning as outlined in the City code, which is “to
regulate land use within the City, including the location, size, use, and height of buildings, the
arrangement of buildings on lots, and the density of population within the City for the purpose
of promoting the health, safety, order, convenience, and general welfare of all citizens of the
City.” (Sec. 113‐2)
290
3
Zoning District Purpose and Uses
The purpose of the Single‐Family Residential (R‐1) Zoning District is as follows:
Single‐Family Residential Zoning
The purpose of the Single‐Family Residential (R‐1) Zoning District is to provide for
detached single‐family dwelling units at a low density along with directly related and
complementary uses.
In term of allowed land uses, for R‐1, permitted uses include:
‐ Single‐Family Dwellings
‐ Foster Family Homes
‐ Residential Facilities serving six or fewer persons
Additionally, with a conditional use permit (CUP), a larger residential facility of up to 25 persons
could be allowed, as well as group family foster homes.
In examining the allowed uses and the purpose of the district, staff feels these are in support of
the rezoning. The property is currently underutilized as ROW and does not have a planned
future as a recognized park or open space in the City parks plan. Given this and the surrounding
neighborhood context, R‐1 seems the most likely zoning designation for the land. While R‐1
does allow larger residential facilities, the site conditions are not suitable for such a use, and
the City as the property owner can have more control over eventual redevelopment into a
single‐family home.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area
Another important consideration is whether the rezoning would be compatible with surrounding
uses. In large part this property is surrounded by its neighborhood of low‐density single‐family
homes. The majority of these homes were built during the post‐war housing boom in the early
1950s, but with some earlier examples as well as more recent cases of infill redevelopment. A
new single‐family home, if designed to be compatible with surrounding neighborhood would not
be out of place given these characteristics.
To the southwest is an interchange ramp between Interstate 394 and Highway 100. Mitigating
negative impacts from the highway would be a major goal of working with Greater Metropolitan
Housing Corporation to ensure that future residents are not encumbered by the adjacent
roadways. Staff will note however that there are existing cases of homes that abut Highways
elsewhere in the City. In this case the existing vegetation creating a buffer near the sound wall
would be preserved for the benefit of the new homeowner as well as existing residents.
Additionally staff expects the home to be built further away from the soundwall to again mitigate
impacts
291
4
Consistency with Principles, Goals, and Objectives
Finally, it is important to consider how this rezoning aligns with the City’s long‐term goals and
objectives, such as those set out in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds that activating this
property for an affordable single‐family home, as planned for with HOPE, would be in keeping
with a number of land use and housing related goals:
Housing Goal 3: Increase Housing Affordability ‐ Increase housing opportunities at a cost that
low‐ and moderate‐income households can afford without compromising their ability to pay for
other essential needs
Objectives
‐ Support the production of new, high‐quality, affordable housing in the City
‐ Identify sites in Golden Valley and adopt land use policies that enable the City to meet
the Metropolitan Council’s affordable housing allocation requirement
‐ Support long‐term affordability of single‐family homes through home ownership
programs and the community land trust model
Land Use Goal 3: Promote High‐Quality Development ‐ Ensure new development meets high
construction and visual quality standards and includes measures of sustainability
Objectives
‐ Encourage developments to respect their surroundings
292
5
‐ Recognize and support development patterns that acknowledge the character of
suburban neighborhoods
Land Use Goal 4: Prepare For Targeted Redevelopment ‐ Use public and private redevelopment
opportunities to advance the City’s Future Land Use Map and policies
Future Land Use Analysis
Like zoning map amendments, city code does not provide specific standards to review proposed
changes to a property’s guided land use. They are often handled similarly, by examining how a
proposed land use is described in the Comprehensive Plan, whether it is compatible with
surrounding land uses, and whether it is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
For the latter two standards, staff generally holds the same findings as for the rezoning. The
surrounding properties are guided for Low Density Residential themselves, and as such the
same land use classification would not be out of place here. Utilizing this property for housing
would again be consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan previously mentioned.
Land Use Description
The Low‐Density residential land use is one of the most common classifications found
throughout Golden Valley, and encompassing all of its single‐family residential properties, as
well as some historically established duplexes. Single‐family detached homes make up around
90% of all residential uses, which itself makes up a little less than 40% of land in Golden Valley
as a whole. Low Density Residential is described in the Comprehensive Plan as:
This category includes primarily single‐family detached units but may include single‐family and
two‐family attached units in scattered locations as appropriate. This land use should be
surrounded by other land uses with minimal impacts, such as institutional and open space.
Given the city’s goal to redevelop this property as an affordable ownership single‐family home,
this land use seems fitting with the intended use. In addition this location makes sense for the
proposed land use, as it is located in an existing residential neighborhood, and has park access
within a quarter mile walk in the form of North Tyrol Park.
Staff Findings
In order to provide support for the recommendations below, staff is offering the following
findings of fact related to rezoning the proposed parcel to R‐1, Single‐Family Residential and to
guide it towards Low Density Residential.
The proposed single‐family classification is consistent with surrounding neighborhood
The proposed use would help to achieve a number of goals from the Comprehensive
Plan
The parcel is no longer needed by MnDOT for highway purposes, and has no anticipated
use within city park or public works governmental services
Utilizing the land for affordable homeownership as part of HOPE would benefit the
City’s variety of housing opportunity
293
6
Recommendation
Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Zoning Map,
changing the zoning for 4707 Circle Down to Single‐Family Residential (R‐1).
Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use
Map, changing the land use for 4707 Circle Down to Low Density Residential.
Attachments
Zoning map (1 page)
294
1
Date: June 12, 2023
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Myles Campbell, Planner
Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment and Future Land Use Plan
Amendment – 4707 Circle Down
Property address: 4707 Circle Down
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Property owner: City of Golden Valley
Current use: Vacant Open Space Lot size: 39,578 sq.ft.
Guided Land Use: N/A Zoning: N/A
Adjacent uses: Single‐family Residential (North, East), Highway ROW (South, West)
2021 aerial photo (Hennepin County)
295
2
Summary
4707 Circle is the proposed address for an undeveloped portion of right‐of‐way(ROW) located in the
southwestern most portion of the North Tyrol neighborhood. The City of Golden Valley is the current
owner of this ROW, and seeks to plat the land in order to be utilized for the construction of a single‐
family home in partnership with the Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation.
Originally platted as a handful of lots within the Moshou Addition in 1965, MnDOT would soon after
acquire the property for highway construction and ROW purposes. It is located east of the
interchange ramp for Interstate 394 and Highway 100. MnDOT would eventually turn back the parcel
to City of Golden Valley to manage the ROW.
The proposal is to replat the land into one parcel, approximately 39,578 sq.ft. in area. The parcel
would front both Circle Down to the north and Natchez Ave S to the east, making it a corner lot. This
parcel could then be used for the development of a single‐family home, with some practical
restrictions as will be discussed below in regards to the lot’s existing conditions.
Existing Conditions
The subject property has no formal zoning classification or land use given that it is considered part of
the City’s ROW. The land has both sections of relatively flat topography closer to the street
intersection, but does see the topography slope upwards towards the rear of the lot and the
soundwall for the highway. In addition, the lot has both a number of significant trees and other
vegetation both along the boulevard and within the interior of the lot. There are no FEMA or locally
recognized floodplains in the area of the property.
In addition to these natural conditions of the land today, another consideration is the presence of an
existing storm sewer pipe that crosses what would become the center of the property. The pipe
carries stormwater runoff from Natchez Ave S to the east west and underneath highway 100 to
connect with MnDOT’s storm infrastructure. Relocating the pipe is not preferably to City Engineering
and Public Works staff, and so an easement would have to be dedicated over the area of the pipe to
allow maintenance over the long term. Based on the anticipated setbacks for an R‐1 property, these
easements and the pipe’s location would not preclude a reasonable buildable area for the parcel.
Staff Review
R‐1 Lot Requirements
For single‐family dwellings in an R‐1 zoning district, the typical minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet.
However, in this case there are 13 other R‐1 properties within 250 feet of the property that average
over 18,000 sq.ft. in area themselves. This triggers an increased requirement of 15,000 sq.ft. for the
created parcel. In this case the proposed parcel is well above either requirement.
R‐1 parcels that will be a corner lot and created through subdivision must also have a minimum width
of 100 feet at the front setback line, and carry that width to a point 70 feet back from the front lot
line. Given that the frontage along Circle down is the narrower of the two at 256.1 feet, we can apply
this standard of width and depth and meet the requirements for the new lot.
296
3
Finally, lots created via subdivision are required to abut and have vehicle access to a public street.
This requirement is met via the frontage along either street.
Minor Subdivision Eligibility
In the City’s subdivision code there are three conditions laid out for a request to be considered a
minor subdivision action:
1. The land to be subdivided or consolidated must be part of a recorded plat or a recorded
registered land survey (RLS)
2. Consolidations may involve any number of parcels, but subdivisions shall be limited to the
creation of four or fewer lots from one or more original parcels
3. The subdivision or consolidation shall not necessitate any additional public investment in new
roads or utilities to serve the lots.
Sec. 109‐119. ‐ Eligibility for Application.
In the case of 4707 Circle Down, the lot meets all three conditions to be eligible for a minor
subdivision action. The existing lot was part of the Moshou Addition. The subdivision will create less
than four new parcels (1). And since utility services are located along Harold, it will require no new
public investment.
Additional Department Review
As required by the Subdivision Code, an initial inventory of significant trees was performed by the
surveyor. This inventory will be reviewed further by the City Forester and used to calculate any
required tree replacement as the lots are redeveloped.
Engineering staff have been involved early in the review of this subdivision in order to determine that
sufficient easements were dedicated over both the existing stormwater pipe and property
boundaries. It’s worth noting that engineers do have some issues with the preliminary plat showing
portions of street ROW as part of the property and without any dedicated easement. This will need to
updated to meet engineers’ standards before the final plat goes to Cit y Council and is listed as a
condition of approval.
The Fire Department and Building Inspections staff have no outstanding comments or concerns.
Qualification Governing Approval as a Minor Subdivision
According to Section 109‐121 of the City’s Subdivision Regulations, the following are the regulations
governing approval of minor subdivisions with staff comments related to this request:
1. Minor subdivisions shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the requirements of the
appropriate zoning district. The lot subdivision would meet the area requirements of the R‐1
Single Family Residential Zoning District.
297
4
2. A minor subdivision may be denied if the City Engineer determines that the lots are not
buildable. The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable due to the flat areas to build on
outside of easements and setbacks.
3. A minor subdivision may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it
is determined by the City Engineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems by
the addition of the new lots. City sewer and water is available underneath the nearby streets and
so will only require a private hookup for the new home.
4. Approval of the minor subdivision may require the granting of certain easements to the City.
Easements being required by the City are shown on the plat document, and include our typical
easements around property boundaries along with an easement over the existing storm sewer
pipe.
5. If public agencies other than the City have jurisdiction of the streets adjacent to the minor
subdivision, the agencies will be given the opportunities to comment. N/A.
6. The City may ask for review of title if required by the City Attorney for dedication of certain
easements. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of
the Final Plat.
7. The minor subdivision may be subject to park dedication requirements. As the City is the
applicant, a park dedication shall not be collected for the subdivision, however Sewer Access and
Water Access charges will be assessed to the property at time of building permitting to account
for the added draw on these resources.
8. The conditions spelled out shall provide the only basis for denial of a minor subdivision.
Approval will be granted to any application that meets the established conditions. All conditions
have been met.
Recommended Action
Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision and preliminary plat, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall modify the final plat to accommodate corrections fromm City
Engineering Staff.
2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final
plat.
Attachments
Existing Conditions and Preliminary Plat (1 page)
298
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES DRAFT
This meeting was conducted in a hybrid format with in-person and remote options for attending,
participating, and commenting. The City used Webex to conduct this meeting and members of the
public were able to monitor the meetings by watching it on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming it
on CCXmedia.org, or by dialing in to the public call-in line.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm by Chair Brookins.
Roll Call
Commissioners present: A. Brookins, M. McCormick, M. Ruby, C. Segelbaum
Commissioners absent:
Staff present: Jason Zimmerman – Planning Manager, Myles Campbell – Planner
Council Liaison: Denise La Mere-Anderson
2. Land Acknowledgement
3. Approval of Agenda
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to approve the
agenda of June 12, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
4. Approval of Minutes
May 8, 2023, Regular Meeting
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to approve the
minutes of May 8, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
May 22, 2023, Regular Meeting
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to approve the
minutes of May 22, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
5. Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment
Address: 208 Meander Road
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
Council Chambers
Hybrid
299
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
2
Myles Campbell, Planner, started with a summary of the request from the City. The City is seeking
the rezoning of an existing vacant parcel of land in order to redevelop the property into a single -
family lot as part of its Homeownership Program for Equity (HOPE).
The lot was originally platted in 1939 and was intended for a single-family home development. The
lot has been zoned differently since then, is an irregular shape, and to the rear is a railroad right of
way. In 2022 Council identified this and two other properties for the first round of HOPE. Staff would
like to rezone this lot from its existing Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas (I-P) to Single-Family
Residential (R-1).
Rezoning Analysis
Zoning Code gives broad latitude to Planning Commission and Council to determin e if a zoning map
amendment is consistent with the purpose of the zoning code, adjacent uses, and the City’s
Comprehensive Plan. Staff compared the two zoning districts and elaborated on discussions held
with Parks and Rec that this lot was not part of the park system nor was it intended to be. Most
homes in the surrounding area are single-family homes and even though there is a railroad nearby,
there are many homes on both sides of the tracks.
As part of the Land Use Plan for the City, this parcel was gu ided for future use as “Low Density
Residential” and as such rezoning the property would bring the current and planned land uses into
better conformance. HOPE was created in part due to the recognition in the Housing Chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan that the City lacked quality affordable housing options and given the Twin Cities
Metro-wide gap in homeownership between white and BIPOC households. Staff continued on to
explain how this request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the comp plan.
Staff Findings
• City would benefit from utilizing the property for affordable single -family home as part of
HOPE.
• The proposed zoning of R-1 returns the parcel to a residential use similar to when it was
originally platted.
• The proposed zoning would match the guided land use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as well
as that of surrounding properties.
• Utilizing the site for affordable housing is in line with a number of goals and objectives from the
Comprehensive Plan.
• The parcel is not planned to be utilized as parkland in the City’s long-term plans and has no
other role in providing governmental services.
Recommended Action
Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Zoning Map,
changing the zoning for 208 Meander Road from Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas (I-P) to
Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Commissioner Ruby asked if a new build would impact the electrical lines and staff stated it’s
unlikely as the easement is 10ft wide and the home can’t be built in an easement.
300
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
3
Commissioner Segelbaum noted the request and the intention to build a HOPE property, then
clarified the recommendation is on the rezoning regardless of what’s built. Staff affirmed this and
added that the City owns the lot and would need to approve anything built on it and the HOPE build
is the intention. The conversation continued around buildability, setbacks, and rezoning.
Chair Brookins opened the public hearing at 6:40.
Chair Brookins noted there were no Golden Valley Speaks comments left prior to the meeting and
that staff did not receive comments otherwise in advance.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
Melissa Caulfield
4720 Circle Downs
There was a point on the presentation where staff said the City will benefit from this project and I’d
like clarification on that. Additionally, a comment was made about “working around the railroad
tracks” and the area being undesirable and working around that, I’d like to know how that happens.
Linda Gieser
5924 Glenwood
When I moved here 20 years ago, I did so because of the greenspace. 13 houses were built in this
neighborhood since I moved in, there’s little greenspace aside from yards. I don’t under stand selling
this lot and if it was a part of my own property, is it big enough to sell to a builder. It seems like the
building envelope is tricky to meet. I understand affordable housing, I was a single mom and
struggled for the first 40 years of my life. I understand not being able to afford someplace that is nice
but it’s possible if you work hard. I don’t object to helping others, but I think putting them on that
plot of land, one that doesn’t seem desirable to build a house, doesn’t help them or the
neighborhood. I’m also wondering why the newsletter of the month said they were breaking ground
in July if this hasn’t been approved yet.
Mark Westby
204 Meander Road
I live next door to this property, on the south side. I think the current zoning does a lign with the
intended use for this property. The Golden Valley speaks presentation noted that Parks and Rec said
this area acted more as an “open space” and there are several other open spaces and nature areas in
the City that share the I-P zoning code. It would be inappropriate to compare these properties to the
intended R-1 zoning code, it’s absurd to say they can’t fit a golf course on the property so it shouldn’t
be designated I-P. These open spaces are an integral part to our City’s 2040 comp plan, it emphasizes
Golden Valley’s commitment to preserving parks and nature areas. Goal 5 of the Land Use Chapter
focuses on environmental protection and aims to preserve and enhance land that supports existing
trees and plants. The implementation action plan further highlights the prioritization of natural
resources enhancement and protection through the use of inventory of remnant parcels. The project
HOPE documentation states that the preparation on meander would require the removal of a
substantial number of trees and shrubs. Moreover, the two lots north of 208 Meander, used to be a
part of the same natural space and they have been renovated and rezoned within the last 10 years.
301
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
4
The City has already decimated the natural spaces in our area. Suggesting that the Parks Department
lacks plans to create a park justifies this development is disingenuous. They haven’t maintained that
property in 50 years, I maintain the property right now and the owners of my property before me
maintained it. They maintained that lot since 1963 when the house was built and even had a shed on
208 Meander that was placed in 1963 and it stayed in place until December 2021 when we bought
the house.
You cannot build a house on this lot right now. The August 10, 2022 meeting minutes from th e HRA
work session, Cherie Shoquist noted this site would require significant variances to be developed. So
why should we rezone if this property can’t fulfill its intended use.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote callers.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 6:27pm.
Staff responded to the comments and reminded everyone the homes in the HOPE program are
targeted for folks who make 60-80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). Staff went on to stat that
specifically is a household making between 75k/year to 95k/year and the goal of this program is for
folks to gain housing who have been otherwise priced out. Golden Valley home prices have increased
and this year houses eclipsed 400k for the average cost of a single-family home in Golden Valley. This
price point is unattainable for many members of the community.
Yes, the home will be placed near the rail road tracks and there’s no way around that. Staff discussed
the easement, ROW, and there’s about 50-60ft from the railroad. Additionally, this isn’t the only
home in the City adjacent to the railroad ROW, and if the City had other properties available they
would present those options.
The July newsletter was likely referring to 1605 Douglas Drive as it did not have any entitlements to
get through first and Habitat for Humanity has targeted a July state date.
Tree mitigation was mentioned and there are a number of mature trees on the south side of the lot
and it’s also the most buildable area on the lot. There are a number of trees that could potentially be
removed or damaged during redevelopment and we would require the City’s tree mitigation
standards to be put in place. A prospective developer also mentioned adding trees along the ROW to
create a natural buffer. The goal is not to clear cut this lot and not replace trees.
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, noted an email that was forwarded from someone who spoke
regarding pollution related to being near highways and high traffic areas. He supposed the
implication is that living in these high traffic areas may not be especially healthy.
Commissioner Ruby supports HOPE, affordable housing, and his concerns about this particular lot
may not be a factor for this particular recommendation. He asked staff if that was part of the
discussion and he added if it was appropriate to request building plans to assist in a recommendatio n
to Council. Segelbaum added that there have been situations in the past where a builder offers plans
and there have been other situations where the group is to determine if the lot is buildable and
where it’s buildable. If another committee stated it would need variances, we don’t know if that’s
true. Chair Brookins noted that the lots in this neighborhood are different sizes and don’t fit the
302
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
5
current standard. It seems that most of the houses in the area would require variances if they were
built today. There’s also no way to know if this lot will require a variance.
The discussion went on to review the height requirements, building envelope, and how potential
variances could factor in.
Staff noted that if the Commission couldn’t make a recommendation, tabling would be the next
reasonable choice as there’s no way to add a condition to a zoning map amendment.
Commissioners requested a map to see the buildable area.
Staff added that during subdivisions that part of the presentation includes buildable areas; during
rezoning requests it’s less typical. In this situation it could be done since staff knows the setbacks,
and easements.
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum, moved to table this
item until later in the agenda so staff can draw up a buildable area to complete the presentation.
MOTION CARRIED
6. Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment and Future Land Use Plan Amendment
Address: 4707 Circle Downs
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Myles Campbell, Planner, summarized the three pieces to this request:
The City is seeking three related entitlements in order to redevelop a vacant portion of ROW into a
single-family lot as part of its Homeownership Program for Equity (HOPE):
1. Amend the Future Land Use Map to guide it Low Density Residential
2. Amend the Zoning Map to zone the property to Single-Family Residential (R-1)
3. Review and approve the Preliminary Plat that would create parcel boundaries through
subdivision
Staff provided a background of the area, MnDOT acquisition, easements, and the topography.
Proposal
• City Council identified this and two other properties for the first round of HOPE in late spring of
2022, the program targets City-controlled sites to develop homes affordable to households
making 60-80% AMI
• After entitlements are finalized, site would be transferred to Greater Metropolitan Housing
Corporation to be developed as a single-family home
• Redevelopment would require new utility connections to City facilities located in existing ROW
• Tree protection and replacement standards would apply for the redevel opment
• Given the existing stormwater infrastructure on-site and a desire to mitigate highway impacts,
staff expects the home would be located closer to the northeast portion of the lot
Staff Findings on Zoning and Land Use
• The proposed single-family classification is consistent with surrounding neighborhood
303
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
6
• The proposed use would help to achieve a number of goals from the Comprehensive Plan
• The parcel is no longer needed by MnDOT for highway purposes, and has no anticipated use
within city park or public works governmental services
• Utilizing the land for affordable homeownership as part of HOPE would benefit the City’s
variety of housing opportunity
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, guiding 4707
Circle Down to Low Density Residential.
Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, zoning 4707 Circle
Down to Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision and preliminary plat, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall modify the final plat to accommodate corrections form City Engineering
Staff
2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat.
Commissioner Ruby asked staff about stormwater drain and staff responded the drain would remain,
and the buildable area is still a large triangle, not impeding the easement. Staff went on to explain
city easements, private easements, and the homeowner’s property lines. Commissioner Segelbaum
noted the lot’s wooded area, and staff expanded on the tree ordinance . Chair Brookins asked about
the removal of City ROW at the rear of the property and staff responded that it was to increase the
lot size and remove ROW parcel fragments.
Chair Brookins opened the public forum at 7:32pm.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
Melissa Caulfield
4720 Circle Downs
I’ve lived across the street from this property for 30 years and that field hasn’t been touched in that
whole time. It’s disingenuous for the City to say selling this property prevents them from having to
care for it because they never have. I believe the City got this property back from DOT 5-6 years ago
and nothing has ever happened. The area along the south wall is a deer passageway so I’m not sure
what will happen to that if it all becomes private property. It feels like the City is identifying any
green space that isn’t a park and placing something on it. Just because something is a DOT remnant,
doesn’t mean it should be developed. All the vegetation you saw prevents noise and air pollution for
us and it’s not just trees. The urban report said that the effectiveness of noise barriers is up for
debate but are more effective when constructed alongside mature vegetation. Those of us in the
neighborhood know that when a tree comes down, our noise goes up and when that happens, our
property value goes down. The same report says that property values go down 4-10% the closer they
are to a freeway and I think this is hurting current owners by doing anything in that space. You can
304
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
7
talk about not disrupting the part next to the sound wall but anything in the area will be an impact.
According to the Urban Institute there should not be new construction that close to a highway for
reasons of health and home values. Their expertly sourced paper states that with every 1000ft closer
to a highway you are, there’s an 8% increase in stroke mortality and a 5% increase in heart attack,
from pollution and noise. You’re talking about a vulnerable population, families of color, that you
want to put in that house, who are already at increased risk for cardiovascular and pulmonary
disease. Of course, a family wants to take advantage of a discounted house, but at what risk to their
own health. My next-door neighbor put her house on the market last week because her realtor told
her the noise will go up and her property value will go down and she should get out while she can.
She lives in a 1.7 million historic home, she’s been there for 7 years, and it’s now for sale because of
the work of the City. I don’t think that’s the intended effect of this. Have you visited these
properties? On Meander, only a few need to be visited. If you don’t live there you don’t understand
the nuance of noise. Arguments that say this isn’t the first house by a freeway wall or railroad track
are hard to accept because we’ve learned a lot more about noise pollution in the last 30 years. Again,
you’re talking about a vulnerable population, families of color, and putting them in places that will
impact their health. I think Golden Valley can do better than that. I asked someone why we’re doing
this program on these properties and the said because it’s the cheapest. Do we always only take the
cheapest vendor bids? Do we buy the cheapest equipment and vehicles for the police department?
I’m all for diversifying Golden Valley. If a neighbor of mine sold their house and moved, maybe
there’s another program the City can participate in where they can buy that house and use if for this
purpose. I think the City has taken a short -sighted approach to these properties and not using them
well.
Mary Winter
609 Ottawa
I object to this because of what it’s going to do to my property value. The previous speaker is my
neighbor and I agree with everything they said. I want to know how many of you live next to
“affordable housing”. That’s all.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote commenters.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 7:39pm.
Commissioner Ruby asked for clarification on the request and it’s a whole recommendation, there
isn’t an ability to negotiate an aspect of the recommendation. The subdivision is happening.
Staff responded that the requirements for a subdivision were laid out in the memo and unless the
Commission found they were not met, there isn’t a negotiation. Commissioner Segelbaum added
that voting on the subdivision doesn’t occur until the rezoning is approved.
Segelbaum reminded everyone that the Commissioners are volunteers and residents of Golden
Valley, most of whom have lived in the City for a long time. He added that he understands impacts to
a neighborhood and this body’s job is to protect the interests of those coming before them and those
that are not. That consideration is weighed with the City’s interest and they are to find the balance.
Segelbaum continued that he doesn’t have concern about this property other than it is green space
305
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
8
that folks have gotten used to; he understands it’s easy to assume things will remain the sa me
indefinitely. Ultimately it is the City’s choice to do what they’d like with their property and it’s the job
of this body to determine if that use is reasonable based on the factors before them. When the
factors are applied, this meets the standards.
Chair Brookins echoed these statements. The lot is significant, it’s buildable, there are protections in
place for tree mitigation, the buildable area barely has a tree in it. Segelbaum added it’s in their best
interest to maintain trees. The discussion continued on specifics of tree mitigation.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to
recommend approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, zoning 4707 Circle Down to
Single-Family Residential (R-1).
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, guiding 4707 Circle Down to
Low Density Residential.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
approval of the minor subdivision and preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall modify the final plat to accommodate corrections form City Engineering
Staff
2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat
MOTION CARRIED
7. Informal Public Hearing – Minor Subdivision of 7324 Harold and Associated Subdivision Variance
Address: 5317 Glenwood
Applicant: Lake West Development
Myles Campbell, Planner, noted this item includes two approvals, a subdivision and a subdivision
variance. Staff noted the property’s location in the City and reviewed its current zoning. The current
home was built in 1926, on the east side of the lot, and is lower when compared to the topography of
surrounding areas. This slope adds to stormwater and runoff challenges.
The proposal is to subdivide and create two R-1 lots, the existing home would stay but be remodeled
to increase livability. A new home would be built on the other portion and subject to current zoning
standards. Both lots would exceed the area requirements for new R-1 parcels, but both fall slightly
short of the required 80’ in width, necessitating the subdivision variance .
Staff reviewed existing and proposed drainage patterns as well as lot size details.
Staff discussed the public meeting that was held in May and reviewed some of the comments. Staff
noted the subdivision requirements, other staff that was involved in the review, and the Fire
Department did not have concerns.
306
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
9
Staff continued to review the subdivision standards, the conditions, and noted that the Council and
Commission may also consider surrounding uses, resulting population density of the
subdivision/consolidation, and traffic impacts.
Recommendation
Based on the findings, staff recommends approval of a variance of 6.56 feet off the required 160 feet
to a width of 153.44 feet for the lot’s width before subdivision.
If the variance is approved, then based on the findings above staff recommends approval of the
minor subdivision at 5317 Glenwood Ave, subject to the following conditions:
1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat.
2. A park dedication fee of $5,415 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat.
If the variance is not approved, the lot width requirement cannot be met and therefore staff
recommends denial of the minor subdivision with a finding that the proposal does not meet the
Minimum Dimension Requirements of the Subdivision Code.
Chair Brookins opened the public forum at 8:02pm.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
There were no in person commenters.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote commenters.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 8:03pm.
Commissioner Ruby noted he appreciates the ability to maintain the current home, he added he’s
concerned about how approving this request may open to more requests of this nature. Ruby
asserted he’s in favor of this request. Commissioner Segelbaum noted much of the same and added
the approval should specify the circumstances that lead to approval. Chair Brookins said much of the
same and added the benefits that will come to all the neighbors by the improved drainage.
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum, to recommend
approval of a variance of 6.56 feet off the required 160 feet to a width of 153.44 feet for the lot’s
width before subdivision.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to recommend
approval of the minor subdivision at 5317 Glenwood Ave, subject to the following conditions:
1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat.
2. A park dedication fee of $5,415 shall be paid before release of the F inal Plat.
MOTION CARRIED
307
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
10
Commissioners returned to the previously tabled item, 208 Meander Road.
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, displayed an image he created to clarify the building
envelope for 208 Meander Road. Staff discussed the setbacks, the building envelope, and
superimposed other homes in the area that roughly fir within the building envelope for comparison
and clarity. Before this item goes before City Council, the image and measurements could be refined.
Chair Brookins noted that the road is offset from the ROW and that the ROW is larger than average.
He asked if BZA takes those things into account when reviewing variances. Staff asserted they do
take it into account and that Meander was likely reconstructed and there is additional boulevard
space. This particular ROW is around 20ft and the average in Golden Valley is 10 -15ft.
Commissioner Segelbaum said the building envelope is present but it feels like a stretch since the
depth is narrower. He added that until he sees the detailed envelope, he’s not sure how he can
recommend approval. Commissioner Ruby said the neighborhood is R-1 and if a house can fit there,
it makes sense. The struggle is the building envelope looks like a hallway and it’s hard to see this
development without a lot of variances. The conversation continued around the homes in the
neighborhood, variances, and current regulations.
Staff added that if this item were moved on to Council, there would be more information on the
exact envelope, a conversation with a developer could occur to understand what style of house
would meet the envelope requirements without a variance, or there would be an understanding of
what variances would necessitate a build. The conversation continued around staff’s general
recommendation and how the HOPE program factor’s in to the decision, and that this lot is
appropriate to receive an R-1 designation.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
denial of the amendment to the Zoning Map, changing the zoning for 208 Meander Road from
Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas (I-P) to Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Commissioner Segelbaum added his denial is based on his uncertainty around how realistic it is to
place a home in the building envelope.
Commissioner Ruby echoed that statement, and added that this decision isn’t based on negativity
towards the HOPE project or similar opportunities in Golden Valley.
MOTION CARRIED
– End of Televised Portion of Meeting –
8. Council Liaison Report
Council Member La Mere-Anderson let the Commission know that the off-street parking updates
had been approved by the City Council and that former Planning Commissioner Ginis has been sworn
in as a Council Member. She noted that June was proclaimed as Pride Month and that Juneteenth
308
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
11
was now a city holiday. The Douglas Drive / Highway 55 project had its groundbreaking and
interviews for new Commissioners were scheduled for July.
9. Other Business
None.
10. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned at 8:37 pm.
________________________________
________________________________ Secretary, Mary McCormick
Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant
309
M
edi
c
i
neLakeBranchIkePond
Colonial Pond
Ottawa Pond
Glen-woodPond
EgretPond
LilacPond
DuluthPond
St.CroixPond
Chicago Pond
LilacPond
Pond CTurners PondGlen 1 Pond
DuckPond
Loop EPond
Loop FPond Sweeney LakeWirth LakeTwin LakeB a s s ett C re e k
Hampshire Pond
DecolaPond A
NorthRicePond
West RingPond
Cortlawn Pond
DecolaPonds B & C
Westwood Lake
SchaperPond
SouthRicePond
East RingPond Bassett CreekDecolaPondE
DecolaPond F
BreckPond
NatchezPond
MinnaquaPond
WirthPond
Toledo/AngeloPond
HoneywellPond
StrawberryPond
DecolaPond D
Bas
s
e
tt Cr
ee
k
BassettC
r
e
e
k
Basset
t
Cr
eekBassettC r e e k
BassettC reekSweeney L akeBranchNW LoopPondBoone Avenue PondMain Stem
Pond B
Pond C
Bassett Creek NatureArea Pond
Medicine Lake
BrookviewPond A
Hidden LakesPond 1
Pond 2A
Pond 2B
Pond 3
Schaper BallfieldPond
Pond O
Pond J
Spirit of Hope Church Pond
GoldenRidgePond
Golden Meadows Pond
SoccerFieldPond
WestPond
201GeneralMillsPond
HaroldPond
Medicine Lake Road Pond
Xenia MitigationPond
10th AvePond
SpringPond
Briar-woodPond
LaurelHills Pond
JFB NWPond
LogisPond
BrownieLake
BirchPond
MinnaquaWetland
GrimesPondBassett CreekPark Pond
SweeneyLakeBranchPond M
Pond F
Pond DP
ond E
Dover HillPondLiberty BasinS w e e n e y L akeBranchBrookviewGolf Course
LionsPark
WesleyPark
Sochacki Park
SchaperPark
ScheidParkHampshirePark
MedleyPark
Briarwood
Laurel Avenue Greenbelt
Glenview TerracePark
North TyrolPark
Western AvenueMarsh
Nature
Area
GeartyPark
Sandburg AthleticFacility
NatchezPark
ValleyView ParkPennsylvaniaWoods
BassettCreekNature Area
WildwoodPark
IsaacsonPark
SouthTyrol Park
SeemanPark
AdelineNature Area
YosemitePark
StockmanPark
Golden OaksPark
St CroixPark
LakeviewPark
SweeneyPark
Perpich CenterBall Fields
Ronald B. Davis Community Center
Brookview Park
Westwood HillsNature Center (SLP)
(MPRB)
Theodore WirthRegional Park
Eloise Butler WildflowerGarden and Bird Sanctuary
Wirth LakeBeach
Golden RidgeNature Area
General Mills NaturePreserve
General Mills ResearchNature Area
BooneOpenSpace
GoldenHills Pond
MadisonPond
SouthTyrolPond
LibraryHill
IdahoWetland
GeorgiaOpen Space
ArdmoreNorth&SouthPonds
JanalynPond
MeadowPond
O p e n S p a c e
OrklaOpenSpace
PicnicPavilion
Chalet
SochackiPark (Three Rivers Park Dist.)
Bassett Valley Open Space
Byrd
BluffOpenSpace
→
FishingDock
PaisleyPark
XeniaOpenSpace
DahlbergOpenSpace
Minnaqua Greenbelt
(TRPD)
(Mpls Park & Rec Board)
Plymouth Avenue The Trailhead
456766
456770
456766
456740
456740
4567156
4567102
§¨¦394
§¨¦394
Æÿ55
Æÿ55
Æÿ100
Æÿ100
£¤169
£¤169
34th Ave N
Medicine Lake Rd
BroggerCir Knoll St Lilac Dr NLilac Dr NThotland Rd
Mendelssohn Ave NWinnetka Ave NSunnyridgeCir
Western Ave (WaterfordDr)Hillsboro Ave NZealandAve
N
Aquila Ave NOrkla DrWisconsin Ave N23rd Ave N
KalternLn
Wynnwood Rd
25th Ave N
Bies DrJonellen Ln
Sumter Ave NRhodeIslandAveNPatsy Ln Valders Ave NWinnetka Ave NDuluth St Florida Ave NSandburg Rd HeritageCirKentley Ave
Wynnwood Rd
Kenneth Way
Unity Ave NB a s s e ttC r e e k D rQuailAveNScott Ave NLilac Dr NLowry Ter
33rd Ave N
Noble Ave NCross LnQuail Ave NScott Ave NRegent Ave NToledo Ave NIndiana Ave N(BridgewaterRd)(WaterfordCt)(Hid
d
e
nLnkesPkwy)Meadow Ln NFrance Ave NTopel Rd
Unity Ave NPhoenix St
Parkview TerWelcomeAveNWelcomeC ir
W e l c o
meAveNXeniaAveNZ
a
n
e
Av
e
NLindsay St
St Croix Ave N
St Croix Ave N
Yosemite Ave NWolfberryLnBrunswick Ave NCounty Rd 102Westmore Way
Green Valley Rd
Louisiana Ave NKelly DrMaryland Ave NOlympia St
Winsdale St
Winnetka Ave NYukon CtWesleyDr Wesley Dr
Plymouth Ave N
10th Ave N
Kelly DrVarner CirPennsylvania Ave NFaribault StQuebec Ave NRhode Island Ave NPhoenix St
Knoll St
County Rd 156Jersey Ave NCountryClubDr
P h o e n ix S tDouglas DrGeorgia Ave NCou
n
ty
Rd40
Hampshire Ave NWestch esterCirJersey Ave NGardenParkQuebe
c
Av
e
SWinnetka Ave NWally St
Ensign Ave N7th Ave N
Golden Valle y Rd Decatur Ave N10th Ave N
Natchez Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Olson Memorial Hwy
Cutacross Rd
Olson Memorial Hwy
Earl St
Flag Ave NHampshire
LnJersey Ave NFloridaAveNEdgewoodAve NDouglas DrDuluth Ln
Scott Ave N
Drake Rd
Lowry Ter Kyle Ave NQuail Ave NPerry Ave NNoble Ave NCulver Rd
Dawnview Ter
Dona Ln
Noble Ave NScottAveNGl
e
ndenTer
Culver R d
Marie Ln W
Hampton Rd
RegentAveNPerryAveNLilac Dr N27th Ave N
Merribee Dr Kyle Ave NHampton RdOrchard Ave NMarie Ln E
Lee Ave NKyle Ave NDresde
n
L
n
Kewanee W
ay
26th Ave N
Me
ri
d
i
a
n
D
r
P
a
r
k
v
i
e
w
B
l
v
d Terrace LnManor DrMcNair DrByrd Ave N
B
a
s
s
ettCreekDrMaryHillsDrZenith Ave NVista DrXerxes Ave NYork Ave NS t M a rg aret D rZephyr PlXerxes Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)(SkylineDr)Spruce TrKyle PlW e s t b r o o k R d Noble Ave Frontage RdCircleDownOrchard Ave NPerryAveNWindsorWayWestbendR dUnity Ave NG reenview
LnRegent Ave NSorell Ave
Frontenac Ave Quail Ave NSt Croix Ave N
Winsdale St StCroixCirAngelo DrUnity Ave NAlfred Rd Spring Valley RdN
o
b
l
e
DrMajor DrAdeline LnAngelo DrAngelo DrWills PlToledo Ave NOttawa Ave NKillarney DrZane Ave NWoodstock A v e Woodstock Ave
Loring LnYosemiteAveN
Turners Crossroad NWestchesterCirN
F
r
ontageRdFlorida Ave NHampshire Ave NPlymouth Ave N
Idaho Ave NOlympia StHampshire Ave NArcher Ave NKelly DrPennsylvania Ave NDuluth St Xylon Ave NWisconsin Ave NSumter Ave NBoone Ave NWinsdale St
Meadow Ln N
DahlbergD r
Woodstock Ave
Poplar Dr Meadow Ln NChatelain T e r
Natchez Ave NEdgewood Ave NK i n g s t o n C i r
Glenwood Ave
Country Club DrValdersAveNOrkla DrElgin PlDecaturAveN
Indiana Ave NRoanoke CirWestern Ave Western Ave
Harold Ave
Loring Ln
WestwoodDrNArdmoreDrWinsdale St
Knoll St
Oak Grove CirDuluth St Zane Ave NDouglas Dr27th Ave N
Bonnie
Ln
Medicine Lake Rd
Madison Ave W
Nevada Ave NLouisiana Ave NCounty Rd 70
ValdersAve NValders Ave N23rd Ave N Rhode IslandAve NCounty Rd 156Medicine Lake Rd
Mendelssohn Ave NWinsdale St
St C ro ix Ave N June Ave NLegend DrLegendLn
General Mills BlvdBoone Ave NSunnyridge LnGlenwood Ave
Janalyn CirJanalyn CirGlencrest Rd Meadow Ln SWayzata BlvdWestwood Dr SWestwoodLn
StrawberryLnOttawa Ave NOttawa Ave SNatchez Ave S Tyrol Crest
SussexRdJune Ave SWayzata Blvd
FairlawnWayNatchez Ave SOttawa Ave SPrincetonAve SDouglas Ave
Circle DownTurners Crossroad SGolden Hills Dr
Laurel AveLaurel Ave
Hampshire Ave SDakota Ave SBrunswick Ave SKing Hill RdGlenwood Ave
Colonial Dr
Medicine Lake Rd
FloridaAveSAlley
Market StMarket St
Louisiana Ave SLaurel AvePennsylvania Ave SRhode Island Ave SSumter Ave SUtah Ave SGregory Rd
VermontAve SWi
sc
o
ns
i
n
AveSGeneral Mills BlvdHanley RdRidgeway Rd
Laurel Ave QubecAve S County Rd 102Nevada Ave SColonial RdLouisianaAveSKentucky Ave SJersey Ave SHeathbrookeCir
G le n w o o d P k w y
(Carriage Path)Xenia Ave SFlorida CtLilacD
r
NOlson Memorial Hwy
Schaper Rd
Lilac Dr NG o ld en V alley R dLilac Dr N(WoodlandTrail)(Wat.Dr)
BassettCreek Ln
(NobleDr)France Ave S (Mpls)N Frontage Rd
S Frontage Rd Olson Mem HwyAdair Ave NAdair Ave NWestbrookRd
34th Ave N
Mendelssohn Ave NAlley-Unimproved--Unimproved-
Wayzata Blvd
Wayzata BlvdBoone Ave NG o ld e n
V a lle y D rSchullerCirN F r o n t a g e R d
S F r o n t a g e R d
Rhode IslandAve N Pennsylvania Ave SAlley
Alley
(Private)AlleyAlleyLilac Dr NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Harold Ave WestwoodDr
N
Ardmore DrT
h
e
o
d
o
r
e
Wirt
h
P
k
w
y
Tyrol Tr(Mendelssohn Ln)AlleyS Frontage Rd
AlpinePassBren
n
e
r
PassDou g la s Ave
QuentinAveSTyrol TrailTy
r
olTr a ilSunsetRidge
Westw
oodDrS
RavineTrTyrol
Trai
l
J analyn C irMadd
usLn
MeadowLnS
AvondaleRdBurntsideDr S u nnyridgeLnBru
n
swickAveNLeberLn
C loverleafDrCloverLnCl
overleaf D
r TheodoreWirthPkwyBeverly Ave
B u rn tsideDrSpringValleyRdT
oledoAveN
Duluth
St
GoldenValle y R dSpringValleyCirC ou n ty Rd 66
(Island Dr)(IslandDr)GoldenValley
Rd
TheodoreWirthPkwyW irth P kw y
W
ay
z
a
t
aBl
vd
G le n w o o d P kwyPlymouthAve N (Mpls )ZenithAveNCrest
vi
ewA
ve
By r d A v e N
Hwy 55
Glenwood Ave
Bassett CreekDrLegend DrLeeAveNLeeAveNMajorAveNLeeAveNE l m daleRd
AdellA veM in n a quaDr M innaquaD r
ToledoAveNOrdwayMa rkayRidge Orchard Ave NN o r m a n d y P l
CherokeePlQuailAveNRegentAveNTr ito n DrT r ito n D rL o w r y Ter
3
3rd
AveN
SandburgLn Lamplighter
L
n
BrookridgeAveNValeCrestRdWinfieldAveCounty Rd 66
P
ark
Place
Blv
d
(SLP)I-394SFr o n tag e Rd (SLP )Xeni
aAveSCounty Rd 70
L ilacD rNLilacDrNLilacD
r
NConstanceDrWConstanceDrESandburg Rd
S Frontage Rd
N Frontage Rd N Frontage RdOlsonMemorialHwy
S F r o n t a g e R d
O l s o n M e m o r ia lH w y
OlsonMemorialHwy Valleywo
odCirYosemite CirLawn TerR
adisson Rd
Turnpike
RdA
lle
y
AlleyTu r npikeR
d Col
on
ial
Dr
GlenwoodAve
BrunswickAve NMeanderRd
MeanderRdIdahoAveNHaroldAve
Wayzata Blvd
I-394SFrontageRd
Edgewo
odAveSIdahoAveNCortlawnCirWCortlawn Cir S
CortlawnCirN
Dawnv i e wTerCounty Rd 70
EdgewoodAveSK in gCreekRdKentu
ckyAveNLouisianaAveNMarylandAve SRhodeIslandAveSRidgewayRdEwaldTe rWestern Ter
FieldD r Brookview Pk w y N Harold Ave
HalfMoonDr
RidgewayRdG oldenValleyR d(B a s sett Creek
Blvd)
Lewis Rd
10thAve N
EllisLnPlym outhAveN Plymouth Ave N
Faribault St
OrklaDrCastleCt Winnetka Heights D rKelly
Dr
Maryland
A
v
eNHampshire Pl
Olympia St
Oregon Ave NQuebecAveNValdersAveNOrklaDrKnoll S tWisconsin
AveNWinsdaleSt
Mandan
AveNCounty Rd 102AquilaAveNAquila
AveNZealandAveNJulianne Ter Ju lia nneTerPatsy Ln
WisconsinAveNAquilaAveNWestbend Rd
WinnetkaHeightsDr
ZealandAveNOrklaDrValdersCtValdersAve NWinnetkaHeights Dr
A q uilaAveNZealandAveNS cottAveNRose
ManorDuluthSt
Duluth St CavellAveNEnsignAveNElg in Pl
23r d Ave N
Medle y L n
(Medley Rd)
(Medley C ir)H illsboroAveN(English Cir
)(Mayf airR
d)(Kin
g
sVa l l e y Rd)(K ings
V
al
leyRdE)(KingsVall
e
yRd W )
(
S
tr
o
d
e
n
C
ir)(Tama rin Tr )
(Mar
qui
sRd)
Ski Hill
R
d MajorCirLeeAveNMajorAveNRhodeIslandAveNG o ld en V alleyR d
G o ld e n V a lle y R dG olden V alleyR d
Hwy100H
w
y
10
0Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100
H w y 3 9 4
Hwy 394 Hwy 394
Hwy 394 Hwy 394ColoradoAve NHwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Colorado Ave SGoldenHills DrPaisleyLnPaisleyLn
I-394NFrontageRd I -3 9 4 N Frontage Rd
WayzataBlvd
I-394SFrontag e R d
York
AveNValeryRdW
asatchLn
Hwy 55
Hwy 55
H w y 5 5
O l s o n M e m o r i a l H w yHwy 55
H w y 5 5
County Rd 40
County Rd 40 Glenwood A v e
CountyR d 4 0
CountyRd40
GoldenValley R d
C o u nty Rd 66ManchesterDr
County Rd 156OregonAveS24th Ave N
LilacDrNRoanokeRdLouisianaAveN
Turnpike RdLilacLoop (Sunnyridge Ln)WisconsinAveN
GettysburgCt(Laurel Pt)
(Laure lCurv)Independence Ave NGettysburg Ave NFlag Ave NWheelerBlvdAlleyNaper St
B e tty CrockerDr Decatur Ave N(WesleyCommonsDr)Winnetka Ave S Winnetka Ave SHanley RdBrookviewPkwySWayzataBlvd
I-394 S Fron t a g e R d
Olympia St
Independence Ave NHillsboro Ave NGettysburg Ave NPassG reenwayU n io n P acific Railroad
Canadian Pacific Railroad B
u
rlin
g
to
n
N
o
rt
h
e
r
n
Sant
aFeRailroadCanadianPacificRailroadC anadianP acificR ailroadC anadia n P a c i f i c R ailroad
U nion Pacific R a i l r o a d
Breck School
SandburgMiddle School
Perpich Center for Arts Education
MNDOT District Office & State Highway Patrol
NobleElementarySchool
CalvaryLutheranChurch
Speak theWord Church
10th AvenueCold Storage
School ofEngineeringand Arts
GovernmentCenter &Fire Station #1
MeadowbrookElementarySchool
King of GraceLutheranChurchand School
Churchof St.MargaretMary
Good ShepherdCatholic Church&Good ShepherdSchool
GoldenValleyLutheranChurch
Spirit ofHopeChurch
Oak Grove Church
HennepinCounty SheriffCommunications
Hennepin CountyLibrary
Fire Station#3
Valley Community Presbyterian Church
ChristianLifeCenter
UnityChristChurch
RedeemerReformedChurch
FireStation#2
Valley of PeaceLutheran Church
Golden ValleyCemetery
Golden ValleyHistoricalSociety
BrookviewCommunityCenter
Breck IceArena
WaterReservoir
U.S.Post Office
Loveworks Academy forVisual & Performing Arts
On FireMinistry
C I T Y O F N E W H O P E C I T Y O F C R Y S T A L
C I T Y O F R O B B I N S D A L E
CITY OF MINNEAPOLISC I T Y O F S T . L O U I S P A R K CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF ROBBINSDALECITY OF CRYSTAL
CITY OF CRYSTALC I T Y O F N E W H O P E
CITY OF PLYMOUTHCITY OF MINNEAPOLISC I T Y O FST. L O U I S P A R KCITY OFPLYMOUTH74
83
94
88
7
5
13
34
8
25
78
87
79
6
75
86
27
56
66
90
46
3365
71
6795
51
70
8163
53
22
93
91
76
84
3947
1-A
72
61
59
68
30-B
77
1-B
42
28
44
89 36
24
18-A
55
2658
95 26-A34
14
48
54
41
98
96
97 100
109
121
120
118
115117123
113
114
110
122
124
112
C
C B B
A
A
City of G old en Va lleyCommunity Deve lopment Department7800 Go lden Valley R oadGolden Valley, MN 554 27-458 8763-593 -8095www.g olde nvalle ymn.go v
Official Zoning Map
Zoning Districts
I:\Maps\ZoningMap.pdf
ORDINANCE NO. 244, 2ND SERIES
This is the Official Zoning Map referred to in Section 113.56 of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code of the City of Golden Valley.
Adopted this 20th day of December 2022.
59 Planned Unit Development (PUD)
See the "Official Flood Zone Profile and Map" on file with the City - The collection of floodprofiles contained in the Flood Insurance Study, Volumes 1 of 2 and 2 of 2, Hennepin County, Minnesota, all jurisdictions, dated November 4, 2016, including the Flood Insurance Rate Mapsfor the City of Golden Valley, panels 27053C0194F, 27053C0213F, 27053C0214F, 27053C0332F, 27053C0351F, 27053C0352F and 27053C0354F, dated November 4, 2016.
Flood Plain Management Zoning Overlay District
I-394 Overlay Zoning District (A, B, & C)
Shoreland Overlay District
See Section on Shoreland Managementfor setback distance from protected waters.
A
(R-1) Single-Family Residential
(R-2) Moderate Density Residential
(R-3) Medium Density Residential
(R-4) High Density Residential
(MU-E) Mixed Use Employment
(MU-N) Mixed Use Neighborhood
(MU-C) Mixed Use Community
(O) Office
(C) Commercial
(LI) Light Industrial
(I) Industrial
(I-A) Assembly: Places of Worship,Schools, Libraries, Museums,Cemeteries: Assembly
(I-C) Civic: City, County, and StateFacilities
(I-M) Medical: Convalescent Homes,Nursing Homes, Hospitals
(I-P) Parks & Natural Areas: Parks,Playgrounds, Natural Areas, GolfCourses
Not Zoned
Print Date: 3/23/2023Sources: Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines (2023). City of Golden Valley for all other layers.
0 800 1,600 2,400 3,200400Feet I
Approved Amendments
Most recent amendment: Ordinance 760 on March 21, 2023
Contact the Community Development Department at City Hall for a list of past amendments.
310
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AJMJPGAJM05/31/202345507Aaron J. MagesPRELIMINARY PLAT11FEETSCALE03060I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.DESCRIPTIONCHKBYDATEREV. NO.NAMELIC. NO.DATECHECKEDDRAWNDESIGNEDOFSHEET_GOLDEN VALLEY, HENNEPIN, MNPRELIMINARY PLAT OF HOPE ADDITIONLEGENDMONUMENT FOUNDIRON PIPE MONUMENTSETEXISTING CONTOURSCATCH BASINMAILBOXUTILITY PEDESTALSIGNDECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREEWATER VALVESEWER MANHOLESELECTRIC METERUTILITY POLEOVERHEAD UTILITY LINEEXISTING DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENTDEDICATED PER MOSHOUADDITION TO BEVACATEDLot 2, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record inthe office ofthe County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.ANDThat part of Tract A described below:Tract A. Lots 1, 3 and 4, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof onfile and ofrecord in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota;which lies northerly of Line 1 described below:Line 1. Commencing at the east quarter corner of Section 30, Township 29 North,Range 24 West;thence westerly on an azimuth of 271 degrees 21 minutes 02 seconds along the eastand westquarter line thereof for 2652.57 feet to the center of said Section 30; thence on anazimuth of 00degrees 21 minutes 23 seconds for 701.35 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 tobe described;thence on an azimuth of 284 degrees 30 minutes 39 seconds for 34.03 feet; thence onan azimuthof 230 degrees 05 minutes 25 seconds for 2.96 feet; thence on an azimuth of 230degrees 01minute 59 seconds for 14.00 feet; thence on an azimuth of 320 degrees 01 minute 50seconds for130.14 feet; thence on an azimuth of 319 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds for 144.27feet; thence onan azimuth of 320 degrees 28 minutes 03 seconds for 168.10 feet and thereterminating.LEGAL DESCRIPTIONCITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTALOT 2 BLOCK 1, AND PARTS OF LOTS 1,3,&4 BLOCK 1 MOSHOU ADD.10101010
311
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AJMJPGAJM05/31/202345507Aaron J. MagesPRELIMINARY PLAT11FEETSCALE03060I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.DESCRIPTIONCHKBYDATEREV. NO.NAMELIC. NO.DATECHECKEDDRAWNDESIGNEDOFSHEET_GOLDEN VALLEY, HENNEPIN, MNPRELIMINARY PLAT OF HOPE ADDITIONLEGENDMONUMENT FOUNDIRON PIPE MONUMENTSETEXISTING CONTOURSCATCH BASINMAILBOXUTILITY PEDESTALSIGNDECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREEWATER VALVESEWER MANHOLESELECTRIC METERUTILITY POLEOVERHEAD UTILITY LINEEXISTING DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENTDEDICATED PER MOSHOUADDITION TO BEVACATEDLot 2, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record inthe office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.ANDThat part of Tract A described below:Tract A. Lots 1, 3 and 4, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof onfile and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County,Minnesota;which lies northerly of Line 1 described below:Line 1. Commencing at the east quarter corner of Section 30, Township 29 North,Range 24 West; thence westerly on an azimuth of 271 degrees 21 minutes 02 secondsalong the east and west quarter line thereof for 2652.57 feet to the center of saidSection 30; thence on an azimuth of 00 degrees 21 minutes 23 seconds for 701.35 feetto the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 284degrees 30 minutes 39 seconds for 34.03 feet; thence on an azimuth of 230 degrees05 minutes 25 seconds for 2.96 feet; thence on an azimuth of 230 degrees 01 minute59 seconds for 14.00 feet; thence on an azimuth of 320 degrees 01 minute 50 secondsfor 130.14 feet; thence on an azimuth of 319 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds for 144.27feet; thence on an azimuth of 320 degrees 28 minutes 03 seconds for 168.10 feet andthere terminating.LEGAL DESCRIPTIONCITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTALOT 2 BLOCK 1, AND PARTS OF LOTS 1,3,&4 BLOCK 1 MOSHOU ADD.10101010REVISE EASEMENT & RWAJMAJM06/26/20231REVISE RWAJMMH06/30/20232312
ORDINANCE NO. 766
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CHAPTER 113
Amending the Zoning Map and Rezoning Properties at
4707 Circle Down
City of Golden Valley, Applicant
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. City Code chapter 113 entitled “Zoning” is amended in Section 113-55 Subd.
(b) by changing the zoning designation of the property at 4707 Circle Down to Single-Family
Residential (R-1).
Section 2. The tracts of land affected by this ordinance are legally described as:
Lot 2, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in
the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
AND
That part of Tract A described below:
Tract A. Lots 1, 3 and 4, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of
record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota;
which lies northerly of Line 1 described below:
Line 1. Commencing at the east quarter corner of Section 30, Township 29 North, Range 24 West;
thence westerly on an azimuth of 271 degrees 21 minutes 02 seconds along the east and west
quarter line thereof for 2652.57 feet to the center of said Section 30; thence on an azimuth of 00
degrees 21 minutes 23 seconds for 701.35 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described;
thence on an azimuth of 284 degrees 30 minutes 39 seconds for 34.03 feet; thence on an azimuth
of 230 degrees 05 minutes 25 seconds for 2.96 feet; thence on an azimuth of 230 degrees 01
minute 59 seconds for 14.00 feet; thence on an azimuth of 320 degrees 01 minute 50 seconds for
130.14 feet; thence on an azimuth of 319 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds for 144.27 feet; thence
on an azimuth of 320 degrees 28 minutes 03 seconds for 168.10 feet and there terminating.
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions” and Sec. 1-8 entitled
“General Penalty; Continuing Violations” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as
though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect form and after its passage and publication as
required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 5th day of July 2023.
______________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk
313
Resolution 23-063
RESOLUTION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN’S FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP
DESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY AT 4707 CIRCLE DOWN TO LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
WHEREAS, the City Council has met at the time and place specified in a notice duly
published with respect to the subject matter hereof and has heard all interested persons, and it
appearing in the interest of the public that the Future Land Use Plan Map as heretofore
adopted and enacted by the City of Golden Valley be amended; and
WHEREAS,the area affected is legally described as follows:
Lot 2, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in
the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
AND
That part of Tract A described below:
Tract A. Lots 1, 3 and 4, Block 1, Moshou Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record
in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota;
which lies northerly of Line 1 described below:
Line 1. Commencing at the east quarter corner of Section 30, Township 29 North, Range 24 West;
thence westerly on an azimuth of 271 degrees 21 minutes 02 seconds along the east and west
quarter line thereof for 2652.57 feet to the center of said Section 30; thence on an azimuth of 00
degrees 21 minutes 23 seconds for 701.35 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described;
thence on an azimuth of 284 degrees 30 minutes 39 seconds for 34.03 feet; thence on an azimuth of
230 degrees 05 minutes 25 seconds for 2.96 feet; thence on an azimuth of 230 degrees 01 minute
59 seconds for 14.00 feet; thence on an azimuth of 320 degrees 01 minute 50 seconds for 130.14
feet; thence on an azimuth of 319 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds for 144.27 feet; thence on an
azimuth of 320 degrees 28 minutes 03 seconds for 168.10 feet and there terminating.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden
Valley, that pursuant to the provision of Sec. 113-28 of the City Code for the City of Golden
Valley, and subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council for conformity with
regional systems plan as provided in state law, the Future Land Use Plan Map for the City of
Golden Valley is hereby amended by changing the portion of the property at 4707 Circle Down
to Low Density Residential.
Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 5th day of July 2023.
_____________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
314
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Community Development
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
4C. Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat for Minor Subdivision and Subdivision Variance - 5317
Glenwood Ave
Prepared By
Myles Campbell, Planner
Summary
5317 Glenwood is the current address of a single-family property located west of Highway 100. There
is one existing single-family home at this address which would be retained with some minor
improvements completed on the lot. For the new parcel created, a second single-family home would
be built. Due to the existing lot’s width of 153.44 feet (instead of the required 160 feet) a subdivision
variance would be required to split the lots. Please refer to the attached report to the Planning
Commission for full details on the site's existing conditions, the proposed subdivision, and staff's
findings.
At their meeting on June 12th, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve both the
variance and the preliminary plan. They noted that neighbors were supportive of plans to retain the
existing home, and to not see the sizable lot redeveloped into a much larger home.
Broadly speaking, staff is in support of the request to subdivide the property and finds the variance
reasonable given some of the unique circumstances of the property.
Financial or Budget Considerations
The subdivision would trigger the City's park dedication ordinance, and a fee of $5,415 would be
required as a condition of final plat approval.
Legal Considerations
Without approval of the variance, the subdivision would fail to meet the R-1 lot width requirements,
and so should Council deny the variance it must deny the subdivision.
The City Attorney will determine prior to approval of the Final Plat if additional title review is
necessary.
Equity Considerations
Increased supply of housing types will eventually bring area housing prices down creating more
opportunity for all income levels to purchase homes in Golden Valley.
315
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the subdivision variance for a reduction of 6.56 feet off the required 160 feet
of lot width to divide the property.
Motion to approve the proposed Preliminary Plan for Subdivision for 5317 Glenwood.
Supporting Documents
Planning Commission Memo 6/12/23
Planning Commission Minutes 6/12/23 DRAFT
Applicant Narrative
5317 Glenwood Preliminary Plat
316
1
Date: June 12, 2023
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Myles Campbell, Planner
Subject: Informal Public Hearing on Preliminary Plan for Minor Subdivision of 7324 Harold
Avenue South and Associated Subdivision Variance
Property address: 5317 Glenwood Ave
Applicant: Lake West Development
Property owners: Lake West Development
Zoning District: Single‐Family Residential (R‐1)
Zoning District
Lot size: 31,720 sq. ft. (0.73 acres)
Current use: Single‐family home
Future land use: Single‐family Residential
Adjacent uses: Single‐family homes,
Meadowbrook Elementary
2021 aerial photo (Hennepin County)
317
2
Summary
Lake West Development is proposing to subdivide the property located at 5317 Glenwood Avenue
into two lots. There is one existing single‐family home at this address which would be retained with
some minor improvements completed on the lot. For the new parcel created a second single‐family
home would be built. Due to the existing lot’s width of 153.44’ (instead of the required 160’) a
subdivision variance would be required to split the lots.
Existing Conditions
The subject property is zoned R‐1 Single‐Family Residential and is also guided for the same zoning
classification in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Moderate Density Residential. The lot is currently
31,720 sq. ft. square feet and has a width of 153.44 feet at the front setback line. It fronts on
Glenwood Avenue to the north and while the existing lot is hooked up for sewer and water, a second
service will need to be installed if subdivided. The City has utilities located underneath Harold Ave, so
this would not require any new routing for sewer/water service.
The lot does have some sloping topography south of the existing home, causing it to be at a lower
elevation than some lots to the south. This should not impact the buildability of the lot, but may
require some regrading to better manage stormwater runoff for both homes and to avoid impacts to
adjacent properties.
Staff Review
R‐1 Lot Requirements
For single‐family dwellings in an R‐1 zoning district, the minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet. 24
other R‐1 properties are within 250 feet of the property, but do not average over 18,000 sq.ft. to
trigger a higher area requirement for new subdivisions. Both proposed parcels would meet this
requirement.
R‐1 parcels created through subdivision must also have a minimum width of 80 feet at the front
setback line, and carry that width to a point 70 feet back from the front lot line. This is where a
subdivision variance would be required, as the lots created fail to meet the 80 foot standard, instead
being 78.05 feet (west lot) and 75.39 feet (east lot). These widths were selected partly to provide the
existing home on what would be the east lot with a sufficient setback of 12.5 feet from the shared
side property line. The new home on the west lot would be subject to similar setbacks and would still
have an adequate building footprint.
Finally, lots created via subdivision are required to abut and have vehicle access to a public street.
This requirement is met via the frontage along Glenwood Avenue.
Minor Subdivision Eligibility
In the City’s subdivision code there are three conditions laid out for a request to be considered a
minor subdivision action:
1. The land to be subdivided or consolidated must be part of a recorded plat or a recorded
registered land survey (RLS)
318
3
2. Consolidations may involve any number of parcels, but subdivisions shall be limited to the
creation of four or fewer lots from one or more original parcels
3. The subdivision or consolidation shall not necessitate any additional public investment in new
roads or utilities to serve the lots.
Sec. 109‐119. ‐ Eligibility for Application.
In the case of 5317 Glenwood, the lot meets all three conditions to be eligible for a minor subdivision
action. The existing lot was part of the Spring Green Addition in 1941. The subdivision will create less
than four new parcels (2). And since utility services are located along Harold, it will require no new
public investment.
Additional Department Review
As required by the Subdivision Code, a tree inventory was performed in order to document all existing
trees. This inventory will be reviewed by the City Forester and used to calculate any required tree
replacement as the lots are redeveloped.
The existing sanitary sewer line is currently compliant for the City’s Inflow and Infiltration
requirements. At the completion of construction for the new home, the new sewer service would also
be inspected to ensure compliance.
Engineering staff have been involved early in the review of this subdivision, as Glenwood is a County
road. The applicant, City Engineering staff, and representatives from Hennepin County have had a few
early meetings on what restrictions might be placed upon a potential redevelopment. Currently that
County has expressed their interest in having a single curb cut associated with the two properties and
as a result a shared driveway. City Engineering staff are comfortable with such a design so long as
suitable agreements are recorded between the properties to manage shared maintenance
expectations.
The Fire Department and Building Inspections staff has reviewed the application and have no
outstanding comments or concerns.
Qualification Governing Approval as a Minor Subdivision
According to Section 109‐121 of the City’s Subdivision Regulations, the following are the regulations
governing approval of minor subdivisions with staff comments related to this request:
1. Minor subdivisions shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the requirements of the
appropriate zoning district. Both of the lots of the proposed subdivision would meet the area
requirements of the R‐1 Single Family Residential Zoning District, although a subdivision variance
would need to be approved given the lot widths proposed by the applicant.
2. A minor subdivision may be denied if the City Engineer determines that the lots are not
buildable. The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable.
319
4
3. A minor subdivision may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it
is determined by the City Engineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems by
the addition of the new lots. One additional set of sewer and water connections will be
necessary, but without any new extension of city sewer or water lines. Engineering does not feel
the addition of the new lot will place an undue strain on City utility systems.
4. Approval of the minor subdivision may require the granting of certain easements to the City.
Easements being required by the City are shown on the plat document, and include our typical
easements around property boundaries.
5. If public agencies other than the City have jurisdiction of the streets adjacent to the minor
subdivision, the agencies will be given the opportunities to comment. Hennepin County oversees
Glenwood Ave and was given opportunity to provide comments and meet with city staff.
Hennepin County does not have significant concerns with the subdivision but would like to see
street access limited to one curb cut.
6. The City may ask for review of title if required by the City Attorney for dedication of certain
easements. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of
the Final Plat.
7. The minor subdivision may be subject to park dedication requirements. A park dedication fee of
$5,415 (6% of the estimated land value with 50% credit for existing unit) is required for this
subdivision.
8. The conditions spelled out shall provide the only basis for denial of a minor subdivision.
Approval will be granted to any application that meets the established conditions. All conditions
have been met, but only on the basis that a subdivision variance is approved for the lot width.
Qualifications Governing Approval of Subdivision Variance
1. There are special circumstances for conditions affecting said property so that the strict
application of the provisions of this chapter would create an unusual hardship and deprive the
applicant of the reasonable use of his/her land.
Given the oversized nature of the lot and ability to preserve the existing home without issues
from splitting the parcel, staff finds the subdivision action reasonable despite not meeting the
letter of the code for lot width.
2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of
the petitioner.
The absence of a variance from the lot width requirement would prevent the lot from being
subdivided.
320
5
3. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
property in the neighborhood in which said property is situated.
The reduction in lot width would not make these parcels significantly undersized compared to
adjacent single‐family properties. By area they would be still be larger than many along Turnpike
Rd to the south, and the new home would be subject to contemporary zoning restrictions to
mitigate impacts on adjacent properties. Not subdividing the parcels would allow the existing
home to be torn down and replaced with a much larger residence that would not fit with the
neighborhood character.
Recommended Action
Staff recommends approval of the subdivision variance to allow a reduction of 6.56 feet off the
required 160 feet of lot width to divide the property.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed minor subdivision subject to the following conditions:
1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat.
2. A park dedication fee of $5,415 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat.
Attachments
Preliminary Plat (1 page)
Narrative (2 pages)
Tree Inventory (1 page)
321
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES DRAFT
This meeting was conducted in a hybrid format with in-person and remote options for attending,
participating, and commenting. The City used Webex to conduct this meeting and members of the
public were able to monitor the meetings by watching it on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming it
on CCXmedia.org, or by dialing in to the public call-in line.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm by Chair Brookins.
Roll Call
Commissioners present: A. Brookins, M. McCormick, M. Ruby, C. Segelbaum
Commissioners absent:
Staff present: Jason Zimmerman – Planning Manager, Myles Campbell – Planner
Council Liaison: Denise La Mere-Anderson
2. Land Acknowledgement
3. Approval of Agenda
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to approve the
agenda of June 12, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
4. Approval of Minutes
May 8, 2023, Regular Meeting
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to approve the
minutes of May 8, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
May 22, 2023, Regular Meeting
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to approve the
minutes of May 22, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
5. Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment
Address: 208 Meander Road
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
Council Chambers
Hybrid
322
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
2
Myles Campbell, Planner, started with a summary of the request from the City. The City is seeking
the rezoning of an existing vacant parcel of land in order to redevelop the property into a single -
family lot as part of its Homeownership Program for Equity (HOPE).
The lot was originally platted in 1939 and was intended for a single-family home development. The
lot has been zoned differently since then, is an irregular shape, and to the rear is a railroad right of
way. In 2022 Council identified this and two other properties for the first round of HOPE. Staff would
like to rezone this lot from its existing Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas (I-P) to Single-Family
Residential (R-1).
Rezoning Analysis
Zoning Code gives broad latitude to Planning Commission and Council to determin e if a zoning map
amendment is consistent with the purpose of the zoning code, adjacent uses, and the City’s
Comprehensive Plan. Staff compared the two zoning districts and elaborated on discussions held
with Parks and Rec that this lot was not part of the park system nor was it intended to be. Most
homes in the surrounding area are single-family homes and even though there is a railroad nearby,
there are many homes on both sides of the tracks.
As part of the Land Use Plan for the City, this parcel was gu ided for future use as “Low Density
Residential” and as such rezoning the property would bring the current and planned land uses into
better conformance. HOPE was created in part due to the recognition in the Housing Chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan that the City lacked quality affordable housing options and given the Twin Cities
Metro-wide gap in homeownership between white and BIPOC households. Staff continued on to
explain how this request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the comp plan.
Staff Findings
• City would benefit from utilizing the property for affordable single -family home as part of
HOPE.
• The proposed zoning of R-1 returns the parcel to a residential use similar to when it was
originally platted.
• The proposed zoning would match the guided land use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as well
as that of surrounding properties.
• Utilizing the site for affordable housing is in line with a number of goals and objectives from the
Comprehensive Plan.
• The parcel is not planned to be utilized as parkland in the City’s long-term plans and has no
other role in providing governmental services.
Recommended Action
Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Zoning Map,
changing the zoning for 208 Meander Road from Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas (I-P) to
Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Commissioner Ruby asked if a new build would impact the electrical lines and staff stated it’s
unlikely as the easement is 10ft wide and the home can’t be built in an easement.
323
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
3
Commissioner Segelbaum noted the request and the intention to build a HOPE property, then
clarified the recommendation is on the rezoning regardless of what’s built. Staff affirmed this and
added that the City owns the lot and would need to approve anything built on it and the HOPE build
is the intention. The conversation continued around buildability, setbacks, and rezoning.
Chair Brookins opened the public hearing at 6:40.
Chair Brookins noted there were no Golden Valley Speaks comments left prior to the meeting and
that staff did not receive comments otherwise in advance.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
Melissa Caulfield
4720 Circle Downs
There was a point on the presentation where staff said the City will benefit from this project and I’d
like clarification on that. Additionally, a comment was made about “working around the railroad
tracks” and the area being undesirable and working around that, I’d like to know how that happens.
Linda Gieser
5924 Glenwood
When I moved here 20 years ago, I did so because of the greenspace. 13 houses were built in this
neighborhood since I moved in, there’s little greenspace aside from yards. I don’t under stand selling
this lot and if it was a part of my own property, is it big enough to sell to a builder. It seems like the
building envelope is tricky to meet. I understand affordable housing, I was a single mom and
struggled for the first 40 years of my life. I understand not being able to afford someplace that is nice
but it’s possible if you work hard. I don’t object to helping others, but I think putting them on that
plot of land, one that doesn’t seem desirable to build a house, doesn’t help them or the
neighborhood. I’m also wondering why the newsletter of the month said they were breaking ground
in July if this hasn’t been approved yet.
Mark Westby
204 Meander Road
I live next door to this property, on the south side. I think the current zoning does a lign with the
intended use for this property. The Golden Valley speaks presentation noted that Parks and Rec said
this area acted more as an “open space” and there are several other open spaces and nature areas in
the City that share the I-P zoning code. It would be inappropriate to compare these properties to the
intended R-1 zoning code, it’s absurd to say they can’t fit a golf course on the property so it shouldn’t
be designated I-P. These open spaces are an integral part to our City’s 2040 comp plan, it emphasizes
Golden Valley’s commitment to preserving parks and nature areas. Goal 5 of the Land Use Chapter
focuses on environmental protection and aims to preserve and enhance land that supports existing
trees and plants. The implementation action plan further highlights the prioritization of natural
resources enhancement and protection through the use of inventory of remnant parcels. The project
HOPE documentation states that the preparation on meander would require the removal of a
substantial number of trees and shrubs. Moreover, the two lots north of 208 Meander, used to be a
part of the same natural space and they have been renovated and rezoned within the last 10 years.
324
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
4
The City has already decimated the natural spaces in our area. Suggesting that the Parks Department
lacks plans to create a park justifies this development is disingenuous. They haven’t maintained that
property in 50 years, I maintain the property right now and the owners of my property before me
maintained it. They maintained that lot since 1963 when the house was built and even had a shed on
208 Meander that was placed in 1963 and it stayed in place until December 2021 when we bought
the house.
You cannot build a house on this lot right now. The August 10, 2022 meeting minutes from th e HRA
work session, Cherie Shoquist noted this site would require significant variances to be developed. So
why should we rezone if this property can’t fulfill its intended use.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote callers.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 6:27pm.
Staff responded to the comments and reminded everyone the homes in the HOPE program are
targeted for folks who make 60-80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). Staff went on to stat that
specifically is a household making between 75k/year to 95k/year and the goal of this program is for
folks to gain housing who have been otherwise priced out. Golden Valley home prices have increased
and this year houses eclipsed 400k for the average cost of a single-family home in Golden Valley. This
price point is unattainable for many members of the community.
Yes, the home will be placed near the rail road tracks and there’s no way around that. Staff discussed
the easement, ROW, and there’s about 50-60ft from the railroad. Additionally, this isn’t the only
home in the City adjacent to the railroad ROW, and if the City had other properties available they
would present those options.
The July newsletter was likely referring to 1605 Douglas Drive as it did not have any entitlements to
get through first and Habitat for Humanity has targeted a July state date.
Tree mitigation was mentioned and there are a number of mature trees on the south side of the lot
and it’s also the most buildable area on the lot. There are a number of trees that could potentially be
removed or damaged during redevelopment and we would require the City’s tree mitigation
standards to be put in place. A prospective developer also mentioned adding trees along the ROW to
create a natural buffer. The goal is not to clear cut this lot and not replace trees.
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, noted an email that was forwarded from someone who spoke
regarding pollution related to being near highways and high traffic areas. He supposed the
implication is that living in these high traffic areas may not be especially healthy.
Commissioner Ruby supports HOPE, affordable housing, and his concerns about this particular lot
may not be a factor for this particular recommendation. He asked staff if that was part of the
discussion and he added if it was appropriate to request building plans to assist in a recommendatio n
to Council. Segelbaum added that there have been situations in the past where a builder offers plans
and there have been other situations where the group is to determine if the lot is buildable and
where it’s buildable. If another committee stated it would need variances, we don’t know if that’s
true. Chair Brookins noted that the lots in this neighborhood are different sizes and don’t fit the
325
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
5
current standard. It seems that most of the houses in the area would require variances if they were
built today. There’s also no way to know if this lot will require a variance.
The discussion went on to review the height requirements, building envelope, and how potential
variances could factor in.
Staff noted that if the Commission couldn’t make a recommendation, tabling would be the next
reasonable choice as there’s no way to add a condition to a zoning map amendment.
Commissioners requested a map to see the buildable area.
Staff added that during subdivisions that part of the presentation includes buildable areas; during
rezoning requests it’s less typical. In this situation it could be done since staff knows the setbacks,
and easements.
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum, moved to table this
item until later in the agenda so staff can draw up a buildable area to complete the presentation.
MOTION CARRIED
6. Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment and Future Land Use Plan Amendment
Address: 4707 Circle Downs
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Myles Campbell, Planner, summarized the three pieces to this request:
The City is seeking three related entitlements in order to redevelop a vacant portion of ROW into a
single-family lot as part of its Homeownership Program for Equity (HOPE):
1. Amend the Future Land Use Map to guide it Low Density Residential
2. Amend the Zoning Map to zone the property to Single-Family Residential (R-1)
3. Review and approve the Preliminary Plat that would create parcel boundaries through
subdivision
Staff provided a background of the area, MnDOT acquisition, easements, and the topography.
Proposal
• City Council identified this and two other properties for the first round of HOPE in late spring of
2022, the program targets City-controlled sites to develop homes affordable to households
making 60-80% AMI
• After entitlements are finalized, site would be transferred to Greater Metropolitan Housing
Corporation to be developed as a single-family home
• Redevelopment would require new utility connections to City facilities located in existing ROW
• Tree protection and replacement standards would apply for the redevel opment
• Given the existing stormwater infrastructure on-site and a desire to mitigate highway impacts,
staff expects the home would be located closer to the northeast portion of the lot
Staff Findings on Zoning and Land Use
• The proposed single-family classification is consistent with surrounding neighborhood
326
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
6
• The proposed use would help to achieve a number of goals from the Comprehensive Plan
• The parcel is no longer needed by MnDOT for highway purposes, and has no anticipated use
within city park or public works governmental services
• Utilizing the land for affordable homeownership as part of HOPE would benefit the City’s
variety of housing opportunity
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, guiding 4707
Circle Down to Low Density Residential.
Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, zoning 4707 Circle
Down to Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision and preliminary plat, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall modify the final plat to accommodate corrections form City Engineering
Staff
2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat.
Commissioner Ruby asked staff about stormwater drain and staff responded the drain would remain,
and the buildable area is still a large triangle, not impeding the easement. Staff went on to explain
city easements, private easements, and the homeowner’s property lines. Commissioner Segelbaum
noted the lot’s wooded area, and staff expanded on the tree ordinance . Chair Brookins asked about
the removal of City ROW at the rear of the property and staff responded that it was to increase the
lot size and remove ROW parcel fragments.
Chair Brookins opened the public forum at 7:32pm.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
Melissa Caulfield
4720 Circle Downs
I’ve lived across the street from this property for 30 years and that field hasn’t been touched in that
whole time. It’s disingenuous for the City to say selling this property prevents them from having to
care for it because they never have. I believe the City got this property back from DOT 5-6 years ago
and nothing has ever happened. The area along the south wall is a deer passageway so I’m not sure
what will happen to that if it all becomes private property. It feels like the City is identifying any
green space that isn’t a park and placing something on it. Just because something is a DOT remnant,
doesn’t mean it should be developed. All the vegetation you saw prevents noise and air pollution for
us and it’s not just trees. The urban report said that the effectiveness of noise barriers is up for
debate but are more effective when constructed alongside mature vegetation. Those of us in the
neighborhood know that when a tree comes down, our noise goes up and when that happens, our
property value goes down. The same report says that property values go down 4-10% the closer they
are to a freeway and I think this is hurting current owners by doing anything in that space. You can
327
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
7
talk about not disrupting the part next to the sound wall but anything in the area will be an impact.
According to the Urban Institute there should not be new construction that close to a highway for
reasons of health and home values. Their expertly sourced paper states that with every 1000ft closer
to a highway you are, there’s an 8% increase in stroke mortality and a 5% increase in heart attack,
from pollution and noise. You’re talking about a vulnerable population, families of color, that you
want to put in that house, who are already at increased risk for cardiovascular and pulmonary
disease. Of course, a family wants to take advantage of a discounted house, but at what risk to their
own health. My next-door neighbor put her house on the market last week because her realtor told
her the noise will go up and her property value will go down and she should get out while she can.
She lives in a 1.7 million historic home, she’s been there for 7 years, and it’s now for sale because of
the work of the City. I don’t think that’s the intended effect of this. Have you visited these
properties? On Meander, only a few need to be visited. If you don’t live there you don’t understand
the nuance of noise. Arguments that say this isn’t the first house by a freeway wall or railroad track
are hard to accept because we’ve learned a lot more about noise pollution in the last 30 years. Again,
you’re talking about a vulnerable population, families of color, and putting them in places that will
impact their health. I think Golden Valley can do better than that. I asked someone why we’re doing
this program on these properties and the said because it’s the cheapest. Do we always only take the
cheapest vendor bids? Do we buy the cheapest equipment and vehicles for the police department?
I’m all for diversifying Golden Valley. If a neighbor of mine sold their house and moved, maybe
there’s another program the City can participate in where they can buy that house and use if for this
purpose. I think the City has taken a short -sighted approach to these properties and not using them
well.
Mary Winter
609 Ottawa
I object to this because of what it’s going to do to my property value. The previous speaker is my
neighbor and I agree with everything they said. I want to know how many of you live next to
“affordable housing”. That’s all.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote commenters.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 7:39pm.
Commissioner Ruby asked for clarification on the request and it’s a whole recommendation, there
isn’t an ability to negotiate an aspect of the recommendation. The subdivision is happening.
Staff responded that the requirements for a subdivision were laid out in the memo and unless the
Commission found they were not met, there isn’t a negotiation. Commissioner Segelbaum added
that voting on the subdivision doesn’t occur until the rezoning is approved.
Segelbaum reminded everyone that the Commissioners are volunteers and residents of Golden
Valley, most of whom have lived in the City for a long time. He added that he understands impacts to
a neighborhood and this body’s job is to protect the interests of those coming before them and those
that are not. That consideration is weighed with the City’s interest and they are to find the balance.
Segelbaum continued that he doesn’t have concern about this property other than it is green space
328
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
8
that folks have gotten used to; he understands it’s easy to assume things will remain the sa me
indefinitely. Ultimately it is the City’s choice to do what they’d like with their property and it’s the job
of this body to determine if that use is reasonable based on the factors before them. When the
factors are applied, this meets the standards.
Chair Brookins echoed these statements. The lot is significant, it’s buildable, there are protections in
place for tree mitigation, the buildable area barely has a tree in it. Segelbaum added it’s in their best
interest to maintain trees. The discussion continued on specifics of tree mitigation.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to
recommend approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, zoning 4707 Circle Down to
Single-Family Residential (R-1).
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, guiding 4707 Circle Down to
Low Density Residential.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
approval of the minor subdivision and preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall modify the final plat to accommodate corrections form City Engineering
Staff
2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat
MOTION CARRIED
7. Informal Public Hearing – Minor Subdivision of 7324 Harold and Associated Subdivision Variance
Address: 5317 Glenwood
Applicant: Lake West Development
Myles Campbell, Planner, noted this item includes two approvals, a subdivision and a subdivision
variance. Staff noted the property’s location in the City and reviewed its current zoning. The current
home was built in 1926, on the east side of the lot, and is lower when compared to the topography of
surrounding areas. This slope adds to stormwater and runoff challenges.
The proposal is to subdivide and create two R-1 lots, the existing home would stay but be remodeled
to increase livability. A new home would be built on the other portion and subject to current zoning
standards. Both lots would exceed the area requirements for new R-1 parcels, but both fall slightly
short of the required 80’ in width, necessitating the subdivision variance .
Staff reviewed existing and proposed drainage patterns as well as lot size details.
Staff discussed the public meeting that was held in May and reviewed some of the comments. Staff
noted the subdivision requirements, other staff that was involved in the review, and the Fire
Department did not have concerns.
329
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
9
Staff continued to review the subdivision standards, the conditions, and noted that the Council and
Commission may also consider surrounding uses, resulting population density of the
subdivision/consolidation, and traffic impacts.
Recommendation
Based on the findings, staff recommends approval of a variance of 6.56 feet off the required 160 feet
to a width of 153.44 feet for the lot’s width before subdivision.
If the variance is approved, then based on the findings above staff recommends approval of the
minor subdivision at 5317 Glenwood Ave, subject to the following conditions:
1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat.
2. A park dedication fee of $5,415 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat.
If the variance is not approved, the lot width requirement cannot be met and therefore staff
recommends denial of the minor subdivision with a finding that the proposal does not meet the
Minimum Dimension Requirements of the Subdivision Code.
Chair Brookins opened the public forum at 8:02pm.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
There were no in person commenters.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote commenters.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 8:03pm.
Commissioner Ruby noted he appreciates the ability to maintain the current home, he added he’s
concerned about how approving this request may open to more requests of this nature. Ruby
asserted he’s in favor of this request. Commissioner Segelbaum noted much of the same and added
the approval should specify the circumstances that lead to approval. Chair Brookins said much of the
same and added the benefits that will come to all the neighbors by the improved drainage.
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum, to recommend
approval of a variance of 6.56 feet off the required 160 feet to a width of 153.44 feet for the lot’s
width before subdivision.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to recommend
approval of the minor subdivision at 5317 Glenwood Ave, subject to the following conditions:
1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat.
2. A park dedication fee of $5,415 shall be paid before release of the F inal Plat.
MOTION CARRIED
330
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
10
Commissioners returned to the previously tabled item, 208 Meander Road.
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, displayed an image he created to clarify the building
envelope for 208 Meander Road. Staff discussed the setbacks, the building envelope, and
superimposed other homes in the area that roughly fir within the building envelope for comparison
and clarity. Before this item goes before City Council, the image and measurements could be refined.
Chair Brookins noted that the road is offset from the ROW and that the ROW is larger than average.
He asked if BZA takes those things into account when reviewing variances. Staff asserted they do
take it into account and that Meander was likely reconstructed and there is additional boulevard
space. This particular ROW is around 20ft and the average in Golden Valley is 10 -15ft.
Commissioner Segelbaum said the building envelope is present but it feels like a stretch since the
depth is narrower. He added that until he sees the detailed envelope, he’s not sure how he can
recommend approval. Commissioner Ruby said the neighborhood is R-1 and if a house can fit there,
it makes sense. The struggle is the building envelope looks like a hallway and it’s hard to see this
development without a lot of variances. The conversation continued around the homes in the
neighborhood, variances, and current regulations.
Staff added that if this item were moved on to Council, there would be more information on the
exact envelope, a conversation with a developer could occur to understand what style of house
would meet the envelope requirements without a variance, or there would be an understanding of
what variances would necessitate a build. The conversation continued around staff’s general
recommendation and how the HOPE program factor’s in to the decision, and that this lot is
appropriate to receive an R-1 designation.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
denial of the amendment to the Zoning Map, changing the zoning for 208 Meander Road from
Institutional - Parks and Natural Areas (I-P) to Single-Family Residential (R-1).
Commissioner Segelbaum added his denial is based on his uncertainty around how realistic it is to
place a home in the building envelope.
Commissioner Ruby echoed that statement, and added that this decision isn’t based on negativity
towards the HOPE project or similar opportunities in Golden Valley.
MOTION CARRIED
– End of Televised Portion of Meeting –
8. Council Liaison Report
Council Member La Mere-Anderson let the Commission know that the off-street parking updates
had been approved by the City Council and that former Planning Commissioner Ginis has been sworn
in as a Council Member. She noted that June was proclaimed as Pride Month and that Juneteenth
331
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
June 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm
11
was now a city holiday. The Douglas Drive / Highway 55 project had its groundbreaking and
interviews for new Commissioners were scheduled for July.
9. Other Business
None.
10. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned at 8:37 pm.
________________________________
________________________________ Secretary, Mary McCormick
Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant
332
To: City of Golden Valley Planning Division
Attn: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
From: Curt Fretham, Lake West Development
CC: Jason Rud, E.G. Rud & Sons Professional Land Surveyors
Ben Hartberg, Calyx Design Group
Mohammad Abughazleh, Plowe Engineering
Jeff Haydon, Haugo GeoTechnical Services
Kelsey Thompson, Lake West Development
Date: May 8, 2023
Subject: Lake West Development Application – 5317 Glenwood Ave Subdivision
The purpose of this two-lot minor subdivision is to provide a desired home in the wholesome
community of Golden Valley, walkable to Meadowbrook Elementary School and other adjacent,
nearby attractions. The desirable new lot will create one single-family, detached residential
home adhering to all R-1 requirements to help meet the demands of a growing population; with
a land use that fits within the existing land use and neighborhood. No zoning changes or land
use changes are being requested.
Lake West’s plan is to fix up the existing house, improve the stormwater runoff as directed by
City staff, and build a new construction home on the new lot. Both will add value to the
community with an increase in the tax base that benefits the schools, city, and public.
Reasonable Variance Request:
The two-lot subdivision requires a very minor variance for lot width by a few feet. As stated in
Section 109-5., “The granting of” this minor “variance” request for lot width “will not be
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood in which said
property is situated.” To propose a plan that doesn’t require a variance, Lake West explored an
eyebrow public street improvement that’s commonly used to expand street frontage in situations
like this when the property is just a little short of meeting lot width requirements. See Exhibit A
on Page 2 below for an example. Lake West was advised that, with staff support, the minor
variance request is reasonable given the city’s desire to provide additional housing.
We hope that you will find our plans to be acceptable. Please reach out to Kelsey Thompson
with any questions or for additional information at, Kelsey@LWestDev.com, or 651-253-0774.
333
City of Golden Valley Planning Division
April 3, 2023
Page 2
Lake West Development I 14525 Highway 7, Suite 205, Minnetonka, MN 55345 I Phone 952-930-3000
Exhibit A: Eyebrow Public Street Improvement at Roanoke Cir, Golden Valley
334
335
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Community Development
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
July 5, 2023
Agenda Item
4D. Adopt Ordinance No. 767 Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 175 to Allow for a Drive-thru
Facility at 8240 Golden Valley Drive
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Summary
Sentinel Management Company is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow drive-thru
facilities at a new Wells Fargo branch as part of a redevelopment project. The current address is 8240
Golden Valley Drive, but it will become 600 Wisconsin Avenue N upon the recording of a new plat. An
existing vacant office building will be demolished to allow for the construction of the new building. For
more details on the existing site conditions, proposal details, and City staff review, please refer to the
copy of the staff memo to the Planning Commission. This Executive Summary focuses on the
evaluations of findings for the conditional use permit.
Discussion at Planning Commission
At its meeting on May 24, the Planning Commission voted (4-0) to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit. There was no public comment on this item.
Evaluation
The findings and recommendations for a Conditional Use Permit are based upon any or all of the
following factors, as outlined in Section 113-30 (d) of the City Code:
Factor Finding
1. Demonstrated Need for Proposed Use
Standard met. The two drive-thru lanes will be
replacing the current five drive-thru lanes and
free-standing ATM at the existing Wells Fargo
location. Demand remains for drive-thru options,
though not to the extent provided by the current
layout.
336
2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
Standard met. Financial institutions with drive-
thru options are allowed in the areas designated
for Commercial use in the Comprehensive Plan,
and are appropriate for these districts.
3. Effect upon Property Values
Standard met. The investment in a new building
will be an improvement to the site, which
currently contains a dated and vacant office
building.
4. Effect on Traffic Flow and Congestion
Standard conditionally met. Given the number of
anticipated drive-thru transactions, the eight
queueing spaces provided should provide
adequate space. Any back-ups would occur on-
site and would not impact the public right-of-
way.
5. Effect of Increases in Population and Density
Standard met. The anticipated regular drive-thru
transactions will have negligible effects on the
daytime population of the area.
6. Compliance with the City’s Mixed-Income
Housing Policy Not applicable.
7. Increase in Noise Levels
Standard met. Without the use of tellers for the
drive-thru stations, staff does not anticipate that
the facilities will generate additional noise.
8. Generation of Odors, Dust, Smoke, Gas, or
Vibration Standard met. No such problems are expected.
9. Any Increase in Pests or Vermin Standard met. No such problems are expected.
10. Visual Appearance
Standard met. Improvements to the site would
enhance the visual appearance of the lot. Mixed
Use zoning standards require the drive-thru be
located behind the building, providing a more
attractive streetscape.
11. Other Effects upon the General Public Health,
Safety, and Welfare Standard met. No other effects are anticipated.
Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 175, allowing for a
drive-thru facility at 8240 Golden Valley Road (to become 600 Wisconsin Avenue South). Consistent
with State statute, a certified copy of the CUP must be recorded with Hennepin County. The approval
of this permit would be subject to the following condition:
1. A minimum of eight queueing spaces must be maintained in support of the drive-thru stations.
Legal Considerations
The legal standards for the evaluation of a conditional use permit are the factors listed above.
The City must make findings in response to each factor, and may make its approval of the permit
contingent upon conditions as it determines they are necessary in order to prevent or minimize
impacts to the surrounding area. However, any condition must have a “rational nexus” – or a
reasonable connection – to the problem that it is purporting to address. Also, the measure of the
337
solution being advanced must bear a “rough proportionality” to the burden being imposed on the City
by the private action. In other words, the fix must align with the problem it is supposed to be solving.
Equity Considerations
The approval of the new bank facility with drive-thru stations is a key component of the
redevelopment plan which would eventually allow the adjacent multifamily building to be
constructed. 46 affordable units would be created as a result, helping to address a shortage of
affordable housing in the city.
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 767 approving Conditional Use Permit Number 1745 allowing for a
drive-thru facility at 8240 Golden Valley Drive.
Supporting Documents
Planning Commission Memo - 8240 Golden Valley Dr - Wells Fargo - 05 22 23
Planning Commission Minutes 05-22-23
CUP Narrative
SENTINEL SITE PLAN
Wells Fargo Plans and Elevations
Ordinance No. 767 - CUP 175 Wells Fargo 8240 Golden Valley Drive
338
1
Date: May 22, 2023
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Conditional Use Permit No. 175 to allow for a drive-
thru facility at 8240 Golden Valley Drive
Property address: 8240 Golden Valley Drive (to become 600 Wisconsin Ave N)
Applicant: Sentinel Management Company Property owner: Marquette Bank N A and Park
Nicollet Real Estate
Current use: Vacant office building Lot size: 1 acre (to become approx. 0.6 acres)
Guided Land Use: Community Mixed Use Current Zoning: Community Mixed Use
Adjacent uses: Commercial/retail (south, east, and north), office (west) – future multifamily
residential to the east and north
2021 aerial photo (Hennepin County)
v
339
2
Summary of Request
Sentinel Management Company is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow drive -
thru facilities at a new Wells Fargo branch as part of a redevelopment project. The current
address is 8240 Golden Valley Drive, but it will become 600 Wisconsin Avenue N upon the
recording of a new plat. An existing vacant office building will be demolished to allow for the
construction of the new building.
Existing Conditions
8240 Golden Valley Drive is a 1.06 acre property that has a 1966 single-story office building which
until a few years ago housed a Park Nicollet medical clinic. The building is currently vacant. It is
surrounded by approximately 65 parking stalls and has access to both Wisconsin Avenue and
Golden Valley Drive.
Proposal
The applicant has been working closely with City staff for over a year to develop a site plan that
provides new housing within the downtown area while also downsizing the footprint of the
existing Wells Fargo branch.
In addition to a new 303-unit multifamily building in place of the existing Wells Fargo bank
building and parking lots, a smaller parcel in the southwest corner would contain a new one -story
Wells Fargo branch building. The site would include a surface parking lot an d access from
Wisconsin and a newly create cul-de-sac on Golden Valley Drive. The applicant is proposing a
two-lane drive-thru along the east side of the building.
Both properties were recently reguided and rezoned by the City Council to prepare for the
development. The preliminary plat has been approved and a final plat will be recorded with
Hennepin County in the coming months. The redevelopment of the site will be phased, with
demolition of the vacant office building occurring over the summer to allow for construction of
the new bank building. Once Wells Fargo has transferred operations to the new building (likely in
the first half of 2024), the old bank will be demolished and construction of the multifamily
building will commence.
The site plan shows two drive-thru lanes to the east of the building in a location consistent with
the standards of the Mixed Use zoning district (i.e., to the rear of the principal structure). Vehicles
would enter the queue from the north and exit to the south into a newly constructed cul-de-sac
at the terminus of Golden Valley Drive. Wells Fargo has shared usage data from last year which
shows that drive-thru teller transactions averaged 11-12 per weekday and 28 ATM transactions
per day.
Hours of operation are anticipated to be 9 am to 5 pm, Monday through Friday. 12 individuals will
be employed at this location.
Elevations of the proposed bank, interior plans, and ATM design are attached.
340
3
Public Comments
Under the standards of the City’s Neighborhood Notification Policy, no neighborhood notification
was required beyond the usual public hearing notice. Information was also posted on the Golden
Valley Speaks website. Staff will summarize any comments and responses at the meeting on May
22.
Staff Review
Traffic
Space has been provided within the queueing lanes for up to eight vehicles. Should additional
vehicles queue, this back-up would occur within the bank parking lot and not onto public right-of-
way. Given the anticipated level of use (an average of 40 drive-thru transactions per day, or
approximately five or fewer per hour), it seems unlikely more than eight vehicles would be in line
at any point.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations
Staff sees no conflict with the drive-thru lanes and the planned off-street trail along Wisconsin
Avenue. The location of the drive-thru behind the building and accessed via the parking lot
instead of directly from the street provides sufficient separation and safety for bikers and
walkers. Exiting the drive-thru, vehicles will cross a new sidewalk as they enter the cul-de-sac on
Golden Valley Drive. However, this will occur immediately following a full stop at the teller and
therefore is less likely to be a concern.
Teller Speakers
Drive-thru facilities that employ tellers can raise noise concerns resulting from the volume of the
loudspeakers – especially when these are located in close proximity to residential uses. The Wells
Fargo proposal does not employ tellers for the drive-thru lanes, relying on ATM stations only.
Therefore, staff does not anticipate noise will be an issue.
Additional Department Review
The City’s Engineering staff reviewed the proposal for conflicts involving traffic safety and had no
additional comments.
The Fire Department reviewed this proposal for adequate emergency access and public safety
requirements and had no comments.
Evaluation
The findings and recommendations for a Conditional Use Permit are based upon any or all of the
following factors:
Factor Finding
1. Demonstrated Need for Proposed Use Standard met. The two drive-thru lanes will be
replacing the current five drive-thru lanes and
free-standing ATM at the existing Wells Fargo
341
4
location. Demand remains for drive-thru options,
though not to the extent provided by the current
layout.
2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Standard met. Financial institutions with drive-
thru options are allowed in the areas designated
for Commercial use in the Comprehensive Plan,
and are appropriate for these districts.
3. Effect upon Property Values Standard met. The investment in a new building
will be an improvement to the site, which
currently contains a dated and vacant office
building.
4. Effect on Traffic Flow and Congestion Standard conditionally met. Given the number of
anticipated drive-thru transactions, the eight
queueing spaces provided should provide
adequate space. Any back-ups would occur on-
site and would not impact the public right-of-way.
5. Effect of Increases in Population and Density Standard met. The anticipated regular drive-thru
transactions will have negligible effects on the
daytime population of the area.
6. Compliance with the City’s Mixed-Income
Housing Policy
Not applicable.
7. Increase in Noise Levels Standard met. Without the use of tellers for the
drive-thru stations, staff does not anticipate that
the facilities will generate additional noise.
8. Generation of Odors, Dust, Smoke, Gas, or
Vibration
Standard met. No such problems are anticipated.
9. Any Increase in Pests or Vermin Standard met. No such problems are anticipated.
10. Visual Appearance Standard met. Improvements to the site would
enhance the visual appearance of the lot. Mixed
Use zoning standards require the drive-thru be
located behind the building, providing a more
attractive streetscape.
11. Other Effects upon the General Public Health,
Safety, and Welfare
Standard met. No other effects are anticipated.
342
5
Recommended Action
Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 175,
allowing for drive-thru facilities at 8240 Golden Valley Road (to become 600 Wisconsin Ave N),
with the following condition:
1. A minimum of eight queueing spaces must be maintained in support of the drive-thru
stations.
This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with
authority over this development. Failure to comply with the above condition shall be grounds for
revocation of the CUP.
Consistent with State statute, a certified copy of the CUP must be recorded with Hennepin
County.
Attachments
Conditional Use Permit Responses (1 page)
Site plan prepared by Civil Site Group dated April 21, 2023 (1 page)
Proposed interior floor plan (1 page)
Building elevations (2 pages)
ATM design sheet (1 page)
343
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
This meeting was conducted in a hybrid format with in‐person and remote options for attending,
participating, and commenting. The City used Webex to conduct this meeting and members of the
public were able to monitor the meetings by watching it on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming it
on CCXmedia.org, or by dialing in to the public call‐in line.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm by Chair Brookins.
Roll Call
Commissioners present: A. Brookins, M. McCormick, M. Ruby, C. Segelbaum
Commissioners absent: S. Ginis
Staff present: Jason Zimmerman – Planning Manager
Council Liaison: Denise La Mere‐Anderson
2. Land Acknowledgement
3. Approval of Agenda
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum, to approve the
agenda of May 2, 2023.
MOTION CARRIED
4. Informal Public Hearing – Conditional Use Permit for Drive‐thru Facilities
Address: 8240 Golden Valley Drive (to become 600 Wisconsin Ave N)
Applicant: Sentinel Management Company
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, summarized the request was a consideration of Conditional
Use Permit 175, this will allow for drive‐thru facilities at a new Wells Fargo building.
Staff presented the location on a map in relation to the City, listed existing conditions on the lot, and
listed the details of the proposal. There will not be weekend bank operations but the drive‐thru will
have ATMs and that is open 24/7. Staff displayed design and the style.
Staff reviewed numerous factors when looking at the CUP.
Traffic
Queueing space provided for up to eight vehicles
Any additional queueing would take place within the parking lot and not within the City right‐
of‐way
May 22, 2023 – 6:30 pm
Council Chambers
Hybrid
344
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
May 22, 2023 – 6:30 pm
2
At the current level of use (approx. 40 drive‐thru transactions per day, or roughly five per hour),
no problems are likely
Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations
No anticipated conflicts with the planned off‐street trail along Wisconsin Avenue
Drive‐thru would be located behind the building (to the east) and away from bike/ped routes
Exiting vehicles will cross a sidewalk along the cul‐de‐sac, but will be commencing from a full
stop at the ATM station
Separately, bicycle stalls will need to be provided to meet City Code requirements
Teller Speakers
No tellers would be used for the drive‐thru lanes – ATM stations only
No anticipated noise associated with loudspeakers
Additional Department Review
No additional comments from Engineering or Fire
Recommended Action
Based on the findings, staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 175, allowing for
drive‐thru facilities at 8240 Golden Valley Road (to become 600 Wisconsin Ave N), with the following
condition:
1. A minimum of eight queueing spaces must be maintained in support of the drive‐thru
stations.
Commissioners asked if lighting would impact the local residents and staff noted there are outdoor
lightning standards and this development will need to follow those regulations. Staff and
Commissioners discussed traffic: vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle, atm location in relation to the
sidewalk, and bike parking.
The applicant was not present.
Chair Brookins opened the public hearing at 6:43.
Chair Brookins noted there were no Golden Valley Speaks comments left prior to the meeting and
that staff did not receive comments otherwise in advance.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
Joe Komarek
8212 Golden Valley Road
I’m curious if there a ballpark idea which is first, bank or building and what the timeline is for the
project.
345
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
May 22, 2023 – 6:30 pm
3
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote callers.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 6:15pm.
Zimmerman noted the Park Nicollet building needs to be demolished first, the new Wells Fargo built,
then the old Wells Fargo building can be demolished, and the new building built. Best estimate is that
demo with start this summer, new bank construction to start immediately. Then progressing into
2024‐2025.
Commissioner Segelbaum noted that the drive‐thru won’t have the noise of a teller through a
speaker and that is a positive for him.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend
approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 175, allowing for drive‐thru facilities at 8240 Golden Valley
Road (to become 600 Wisconsin Ave N), with the following condition:
1. A minimum of eight queueing spaces must be maintained in support of the drive‐thru
stations.
MOTION CARRIED
5. Informal Public Hearing – Tax Increment Plan Consistency with 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Address: 820 Golden Valley Road and 8240 Golden Valley Drive
Cherie Shoquist, Housing and Economic Development Manager, mentioned her previous
appearance before the Commission and noted this is now the first project presentation under the
City’s new Mixed‐Income Policy. Shoquist noted that the Commission’s role in this analysis is to make
a determination on if the Tax Increment Financing Plan is consistent with Golden Valley’s
Comprehensive Plan. Shoquist noted that the tax increment financing is to benefit the 303‐unit
multi‐family apartment building, 46 units will be affordable at 60% of Area Median Income.
There are preliminary terms of development, some went to the HRA Session in May, today is the
determination on if the TIF Plan is consistent with the Comp Plan, and next will be the June 20
HRA/Council meeting to consider recommendation and approval of Request for Tax Increment
Financing.
Shoquist continued by defining the Mixed Income Housing Policy at the City while detailing what that
means for rental developments and specifically the Sentinal Apartments of Golden Valley.
Shoquist discussed that the City worked with the Municipal Advisor, Baker Tilly, to create an analysis
regarding tax increment financing. This analysis defined TIF, properties within a TIF district, and
developer eligibility. She continued with comparative charts and how the HRA, Planning Commission,
and City Council all play a role in the determinations for this project to move forward and potentially
be renewed in the future.
346
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
May 22, 2023 – 6:30 pm
4
Commissioner Ruby mentioned this TIF is provided for 15 years and then at 20 years the housing
units would return to market rate. Why can’t the units remain affordable because as he sees it, this
project isn’t solving the issue if this potential solution disappears. Shoquist noted that part of her
role is to provide an array of housing choices in the City and the TIF statute allows for some longevity
options as part of the area being developed, redeveloped, or renewed. In this situation, an option
that would increase that affordable housing to even 30 years was not an option. The City’s Mixed‐
Income Housing Policy requires 20 years of affordable so the developer is only receiving 15 years of
TIF Financing and then providing 20. Shoquist continued by discussing hurdles in financing, building,
supply, and demand as all reasons behind this result.
Commissioner Segelbaum asked about the two options for affordable housing in the presentation
and what defines them and how they relate to TIF. Shoquist discussed the requirement differences
for either 15% of the units be at 60% AMI for 20 years and 10% of the units being at 50% AMI for 20
years. The choice the City used was to encourage developers to build without going to the State,
County, and Met Council for additional funding to compensate.
Staff and Commissioners went on to discuss zoning map amendments, developers, TIF requirements,
the City’s Mixed‐Income Housing Policy, and the process for these developments. This conversation
continued so Commissioners could understand the full breadth of requirements and possibilities as
the City moves forward. Staff also broke down the details of other projects, their sources of funding,
investors, and how they relate to the City’s goals. Staff and Commissioners also reviewed the new
Mixed‐Income policy, how developers meet the City requirements, and the City adding a
requirement to their development agreement that they use MN Housing Connections for financial
reporting.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Resolution finding the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax
Increment Financing (Renewal and Renovation) Golden Valley Road and Wisconsin Avenue District
Consistent with the Golden Valley Comprehensive Plan.
Chair Brookins opened the public forum at 7:32pm.
Chair Brookins asked staff if comments were received prior to the meeting. There were none.
Chair Brookins invited in person commenters to speak first.
There were no in person commenters.
Chair Brookins invited remote callers to speak.
There were no remote commenters.
Chair Brookins closed the public comment portion at 7:24pm.
Commissioner Segelbaum said he’s in favor of Golden Valley’s policies to establish reduced cost
housing and TIF is a good way to proceed. He added it’s good to understand the risks to the City and
not overextend. The Baker Tilly report went in depth on the requirements for statutory authorization
and he didn’t see anything other than a statement that it meets the stated requirements. If the City
347
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
May 22, 2023 – 6:30 pm
5
wants to rely on the statement without data to support it, then he suggested the memo should have
included more information on how the requirements were met.
Chair Brookins stated that he didn’t see a lot of data that ties the program into the Comprehensive
Plan and the report didn’t touch on that. He added it would have been nice to see the goals in the
memo that are specifically being met.
MOTION made by Commissioner Ruby, seconded by Commissioner McCormick, to recommend
approval of the Resolution finding the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing
(Renewal and Renovation) Golden Valley Road and Wisconsin Avenue District Consistent with the
Golden Valley Comprehensive Plan.
MOTION CARRIED
– End of Televised Portion of Meeting –
6. Annual Commissioner Orientation
Zimmerman presented the annual orientation and answered questions from Commissioners.
7. Council Liaison Report
Council Member La Mere‐Anderson indicated that Commissioner Ginis had been appointed to the
City Council and would be resigning from the Planning Commission. Her term will run through
January 2, 2024. She noted that the Environmental Commission was fully staffed, but all other Boards
and Commissions had vacancies that needed to be filled.
8. Other Business
Commissioner McCormick was elected as Secretary to replace Commissioner Ginis.
9. Adjournment
MOTION by Commissioner Ruby to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum and
approved unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:05 pm.
________________________________
________________________________ Secretary, Mary McCormick
Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant
348
8200 Golden Valley Road
Conditional Use Permit responses
to Section 113:30 Conditional Uses
1. Demonstrated need for the proposed use:
a. The two proposed drive through lanes will serve customers of the bank. The two lanes are a
reduction from the previous five drive through lanes. Wells Fargo believes that customers
value the ability to drive up to ATM machines, and that it especially helps persons who have
mobility issues.
b. Wells Fargo has shared usage data from the previous year. Drive-through ATM volume
averaged 28 transactions per day, and drive-up teller transactions averaged 11-12 transactions
per business day (7.6 per day).
2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan:
a. The drive through lanes are a small part of the larger development which is overall consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Golden Valley
3. Effect of property values in the neighboring area:
a. The footprint of the bank and drive through lanes are significantly reduced from the current
condition. The drive through lanes are largely concealed from street view and thus should not
affect the property value of neighboring properties.
4. Effect of any anticipated traffic generation upon the current traffic flow and congestion in the area:
a. The existing bank and drive through lanes do not generate excessive amounts of traffic in the
neighborhood, and the right sizing of this facility will not change the anticipated use of the
new facility and its drive through lanes.
5. Effect of any increases in population and density upon surrounding land uses.
a. The proposed bank and drive through lanes will increase the population and density of this
site.
6. Compliance with the City’s Mixed Income Housing Policy. Not applicable.
7. Increase in noise levels to be caused by proposed use:
a. There should be no increase in the volume or intensity of use for the new drive through lanes.
Wells Fargo has experienced a decrease in drive up banking as online banking has gained
popularity in the last ten years but many long-time customers continue to value the drive up
banking option.
8. Any odors, dust, smoke, gas, or vibration to be caused by the proposed us:
a. There will be no odors, dust, smoke, gas, or vibration caused by the two proposed drive
through banking lanes.
9. Any increase in pests, flies, rats or other animals or vermin in the area to be caused by the proposed
use:
a. The drive-up banking use will not increase the number pests, flies, rats or other animals or
vermin in the area with the proposed drive through banking lanes.
10. Visual appearance of the proposed structure or use:
a. The visual appearance of the drive through banking lanes will be largely concealed from the
public right of way by the new bank building itself, thus minimizing the impact of the drive
through lanes. The drive through lanes are oriented to away from adjacent residential
buildings in order to prevent vehicle headlights from shining into dwelling units.
349
WISCONSIN AVENUE N(A Public R/W)(A Public R/W)(A Public
R/
W)Concrete SidewalkConcreteConcreteConcreteConcretePaversPaversned 9" VSP)Abandoned9" VCP (PerRec)Abandoned 8"VCP (Per Rec)9" VSP9" VSP9" VSPSan. Serv.San. Serv.8" VCP8" VCP8" VCP12" RC
P
12" RCPWat. S
erv.(Per Rec)Wat. Serv.(Per Rec)Wat. Serv.(Per Rec)GOLDEN VALLEY DRIVEWat. Serv.[11] Utility & DrainageEasement Per Plat[11] Utility & DrainageEasement Per Plat[11] Utility & DrainageEasement Per Plat[11] Utilit
y
&
Dr
ai
n
a
g
e
Easem
e
nt
P
er
Pl
at
PARCEL BPARCEL A[8] San. Sewer Easementper Doc. No. 54231688" DIP (Per Rec)8" DIP (Per Rec)GOLD
E
N
V
ALL
EY
R
O
A
D
dAbandoned GasLine Per ProvidedMapping[A] Back of CurbCrosses Property LineegeagenaginaainraitDraatDrlat& DPla& r Py &er ty PerlityPetilitt PUtint Uten] Ume1] me11]em[11se[1ase[EasEaESSSaranr Dn.Don. Doocc. . LOT 1134,644 SF664646666664646464466666464646444443.09 AC39000003.0033333333333333...0333333333333333....03.3.03.03.0009AA9A9AA99CC939CC939C3309ACC39A3.ACC39ACCCCCCAA.333CCC900.3.009 AC09 AC0CC0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC09 AC09 AC09 AC222LOT 22226,040 SF22222222220.60 ACCPCPCPppeer88]]e
at
ag
r PlatPer Plt Perent P
ement
asem
U
Ease]]Ea
1[1]]UtUU
& Dr
n geg
CPCPSENTINEL GOLDEN VALLEY600, 640 WISCONSIN AVE, GOLDEN VALLEY MN 554275215 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, #100, EDINA, MN 55439SENTINEL MANAGEMENT COMPANYPROJECTPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER: 222873/14/2023 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL3/17/2023 SCHEMATIC DESIGN4/21/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL......1/23/2023 LUA SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:JR, RB MP, RB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c2023civilsitegroup.com44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.4-21-23REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:NKnow what'sROPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVALALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE OUTSIDEPARKING LOT. WHEN FULL, REMOVAL CO.SHALL REMOVE EXCESS OF-SITETRASH REMOVAL:TRASH SHALL BE PLACED IN INTERIOR TRASHROOM AND REMOVED BY COMMERCIAL CO.WEEKLY.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE FRONTDOOR VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERYVEHICLES (UPS, FED-EX, USPS).SITE DATAZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING C - COMMERCIAL PROPOSED ZONINGMU-C - MIXED USECOMMUNITY SETBACKSREQUIREDPROVIDED PRIMARY FRONT - ALL SIDES 5'-10'BUILDING SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS 303REQUIREDPROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT 48' -PARKING SUMMARY PARKING SPACE SIZING 9'X18.5' COMPACT PARKING SPACE SIZING DRIVE AISLE SIZE24'REQUIREDPROVIDED NUMBER OF PARKING @ 1:1.5455 457
350
MN-Golden Valley proposed plan
8
4,348 GSF (4,103 USF)
Program Detail Qty.
Lobby Teller Station 3
Lobby Teller TCR 1
Platform Stations 8
Consult Room 1
Customer SD Box Vault 10’ x 19’
Lobby ATM 1
Walk-up ATM (vestibule)1
Drive-up ATM 2
351
SLAB0"T.O. PARAPET21' -6"T.O. LOW PARAPET20' -0"EA-1 ACCENT CLADDINGEB-1 STONEEM-1 ACM WALL PANELSACM PANELBY SIGNAGE VENDORET-1 METAL COPPINGET-2 HM EXIT DOOREC-1 ACM CANOPY PANELSEC-2 ACM CANOPY PANELSET-3 BREAK METAL BASE27' - 4 7/8"10' - 11 3/8"ET-1 TRIMES-1 CURTAIN WALL SYSTEMSLAB0"T.O.S14' -0"T.O. PARAPET21' -6"T.O. LOW PARAPET20' -0"EB-1 STONEENTRY DOOR AND FRAMEET-1 METAL COPPINGEC-1 ACM CANOPY PANELSEC-2 ACM CANOPY PANELSEC-1 ACM CANOPY PANELSEC-2 ACM CANOPY PANELSET-1 TRIMES-1 CURTAIN WALL SYSTEMET-1 TRIMET-3 BREAK METAL BASE28' - 5 1/2"11' - 3 3/8"EM-1 ACM WALL PANELSACM PANELBY SIGNAGE VENDOR1/4" = 1'‐0"1SOUTH1/4" = 1'‐0"2NORTHARCHITECT PROJECT NUMBERDATE ISSUED:CONSULTANTSSHEET NUMBERREVISIONSREVIEWED BY:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLEARCHITECTSET ISSUED:FOR REVIEW SET 00/00/0000G:\Wells Fargo\_WF Retail Test Fits General 21-206\22-671 MN, Golden Valley\06 Construction Documents\Support\22-671 MN-Golden Vally ELEV only .rvt12/8/2022 2:26:59 PM22-671GOLDEN VALLEY, MN8240 GOLDEN VALLEY RD.PROJECT #: 399587BE#: 112140Issue DateEXTERIORELEVATIONSA4.00ApproverAuthor-REV REASON FOR ISSUE DATE
352
SLAB0"T.O.S14' -0"T.O. PARAPET21' -6"T.O. LOW PARAPET20' -0"EM-1 ACM WALL PANELSET-1 METAL COPING28' - 7 1/4"EA-1 ACCENT CLADDINGET-3 BREAK METAL BASEES-1 CURTAIN WALL SYSTEMEM-1 ACM WALL PANELSACM PANELBY SIGNAGE VENDORET-1 TRIMEC-1 ACM CANOPY PANELSEC-2 ACM CANOPY PANELSSLAB0"T.O.S14' -0"T.O. PARAPET21' -6"T.O. LOW PARAPET20' -0"ET-1 METAL COPPINGEB-1 STONEEA-1 ACCENT CLADDINGET-1 TRIM28' - 5 3/4"7' - 6"ES-1 CURTAIN WALL SYSTEMEM-1 ACM WALL PANELSACM PANELBY SIGNAGE VENDORET-3 BREAK METAL BASEEA-1 ACCENT CLADDINGET-2 HM SPRINKLER RM. DOORET-1 TRIMEC-1 ACM CANOPY PANELSEC-2 ACM CANOPY PANELS1/4" = 1'‐0"2WEST1/4" = 1'‐0"1EASTARCHITECT PROJECT NUMBERDATE ISSUED:CONSULTANTSSHEET NUMBERREVISIONSREVIEWED BY:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLEARCHITECTSET ISSUED:FOR REVIEW SET 00/00/0000G:\Wells Fargo\_WF Retail Test Fits General 21-206\22-671 MN, Golden Valley\06 Construction Documents\Support\22-671 MN-Golden Vally ELEV only .rvt12/8/2022 2:27:07 PM22-671GOLDEN VALLEY, MN8240 GOLDEN VALLEY RD.PROJECT #: 399587BE#: 112140Issue DateEXTERIORELEVATIONSA4.01ApproverAuthor-REV REASON FOR ISSUE DATE
353
Project ID
It is the Customer’s responsibility to
ensure that the structure of the
building is designed and constructed
being ordered. Please ask PSG
to provide further details if required.
All rights reserved. The artwork
depicted herein are copyright and
are the exclusive property of
cannot be reproduced in whole or
120V
Other
Signature
MM/DD/YYYY
347V
Customer Approval
Date:
Scale:
Sales:
Designer:
Revision Note:
Rev. #:
Date:
Sign Item
Electrical
01-30-2023
NTS
J. Christensen
M. Holman
WF BE 112140
Wells Fargo
8240 Golden Valley Rd.
Golden Valley, MN 55427
RK2-50359
Required:
Final dimensions subject to
site survey and/or technical
Fluorescent, Neon and HID lamps contain Mercury (HG).
Dispose of the lamps according to Local, Provincial, State or Federal Laws.This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign.N13
520 W Summit Hill, Suite 702, Knoxville TN, 37902
www
N13 Island Drive-up - DN490 ENCL-C WF4000
Model Number: DN490 ENCL-C WF4000
The WF4000 island drive-up enclosure with canopy is
comprised of a white aluminum enclosure with a red bezel
that projects out from the enclosure and visually wraps
internally illuminated with white LEDs. The canopy has
red panels that stage similar illuminated white Wells
graphic,” which is applied to minimize visual wear and
354
ORDINANCE NO. 767
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
Approval of Conditional Use Permit Number 175
8240 Golden Valley Drive
Sentinel Management Company, Applicant
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. City Code Chapter 113 entitled “Zoning” is amended in Section 113-55,
Subd. b, and Section 113-96, by approving a Conditional Use Permit for a certain tract of
land (parking lot) located at 8420 Golden Valley Drive, thereby allowing for a drive-thru
facility in a Mixed Use Zoning District.
This Conditional Use Permit is approved based on the application materials and
plans submitted by the applicant, staff memos, public comments and information presented
to the Planning Commission and City Council, and findings recommended by the Planning
Commission. This Conditional Use Permit is approved pursuant to City Code Section 113-
30, Subd. g, and adopted by the City Council on December 20, 2022.
This Conditional Use Permit is subject to all of the terms of the permit to be issued
including, but not limited to, the following specific conditions:
1. A minimum of eight queueing spaces must be maintained in support of the drive-thru
stations.
Section 2. The tract of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as follows:
Lot 2, Block 2, Valley Square 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions” and Sec. 1-8 entitled
“General Penalty; Continuing Violations” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference,
as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 5th day of July 2023.
______________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk
355
Review of Council Calendar
Event Event Time Location
JULY
Tuesday, July 4
City Offices Closed for Observance of Independence Day
Wednesday, July 5
Special City Council Meeting
(Commissioner Interviews)5:15 PM Hybrid - Council Conference Room
Special HRA Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid - Council Chambers
City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid - Council Chambers
Sunday, July 9
Market in the Valley 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM City Hall Campus
Monday, July 10
Ice Cream Social 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM Brookview Park
Tuesday, July 11
Council Work Session 6:30 PM Hybrid - Council Conference Room
Sunday, July 16
Market in the Valley 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM City Hall Campus
Tuesday, July 18
Special City Council Meeting
(Commissioner Interviews)5:30 PM Hybrid - Council Conference Room
City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid - Council Chambers
Sunday, July 23
Market in the Valley 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM City Hall Campus
Thursday, July 27
Golden Valley Business Council Meeting 8:30 AM - 9:30 AM Hybrid
Brookview - Valley View Room
Grand Opening of Old National Bank at 10 West 3:00 PM 10 West End,
1601 Utica Ave S
Annual Taste and Tour of Golden Valley 5:00 PM - 8:30 PM City Hall Campus & various local
businesses
Friday, July 28
Penny Carnival 12:30 PM - 2:00 PM Brookview Park
Sunday, July 30
Market in the Valley 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM City Hall Campus
AUGUST
Tuesday, August 1
National Night Out 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM Various Locations/In-Person
Wednesday, August 2
City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid - Council Chambers
Sunday, August 6
Market in the Valley 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM City Hall Campus
Tuesday, August 8
HRA Work Session 6:30 PM Hybrid - Council Conference Room
Council Work Session 6:30 PM Hybrid - Council Conference Room
Sunday, August 13
Market in the Valley 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM City Hall Campus
Tuesday, August 15
City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid - Council Chambers
Sunday, August 20
Market in the Valley 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM City Hall Campus
356