09-12-23 City Council Work Session AgendaSeptember 12, 2023 — 6:30 PM
Council Conference Room
Hybrid Meeting
1.Naming and Renaming Process Discussion for Publicly Owned Assets
2.Home Occupation Regulations
3.Review 2024 Audit Report and Management Letter
4.Review and Continue Discussion of 2024-2025 Proposed Budgets and 2024-2032 Proposed
Capital Improvement Program.
5.Council Review of Future Draft Agendas
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
City Council Work Sessions are being conducted in a hybrid format with in-person and remote options
for attending.
Remote Attendance: Members of the public may attend this meeting by streaming via Webex, or by
calling 1-415-655-0001 and entering access code 2630 546 6658 and webinar password
1234. Additional information about attending electronic meetings is available on the City website .
Discussion Item(s)
Council Work Session meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed for the
Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and provide general directions
to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The public is invited to attend Council Work
Session meetings and listen to the discussion; public participation is allowed by invitation of the City
Council.
City of Golden Valley City Council Work Session September 12, 2023 — 6:30 PM
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Parks & Recreation
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
September 12, 2023
Agenda Item
1. Naming and Renaming Process Discussion for Publicly Owned Assets
Prepared By
Sheila VanSloun, Parks & Recreation Administrative Assistant
Rick Birno, Parks & Recreation Director
Brian Erickson, Recreation Supervisor
Summary
The City Council requested staff to develop an initial proposal to review for the development of a
naming and renaming process for City of Golden Valley publicly owned assets. Staff has met with the
Open Space and Recreation Commission (OSRC) and the Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity Commission
(DEIC) to review a group of key questions and provide input for staff recommendations in preparation
for discussion and direction from City Council to gather resident input. Staff has also developed step-
by-step process proposals and a general information outline.
Financial or Budget Considerations
None at this time.
Legal Considerations
Not required.
Equity Considerations
In order to uphold our commitment to inclusive and effective community engagement, we strive to
ensure the decision-making input for our naming and renaming process is representative of our
community’s diversity so that it reflects the collective wisdom and consensus of our community, with
an emphasis on equity and inclusivity.
Recommended Action
Staff is asking for direction from the City Council on each of the key questions, proposed processes and
general guiding information to develop an initial summary for a proposal to solicit resident input.
Supporting Documents
Naming and Renaming Input, Process Proposal, and General Guidelines.docx
2
Naming and Renaming Input,
Process Proposal,
and General Guidelines
September 2023
3
Naming-Renaming Publicly Owned Assets
Input Results
QUESTION OSRC DEIC STAFF
RECOMMENDATION
NAMING-RENAMING
Should publicly owned assets be
named or renamed after
individuals or community
organizations?
If yes, should there be a clear
affiliation between the
individual or community
organization and the City of
Golden Valley?
No support going
forward.
No support for this
Yes
Give priority to GV
affiliation, however,
not required.
Yes
Would prefer a clear
affiliation between the
individual or community
organization and the City of
Golden Valley, however not
mandatory.
When a naming/renaming
request is submitted, if there are
potential expenses and impacts
to residents, or the community
as a whole, should this be a
consideration when determining
naming or renaming?
Yes Yes Yes. Potential expenses and
resident impacts should
always be considered when
naming or renaming a
publicly owned asset.
Should non-residents be eligible
to request a naming or renaming
recognition?
No. Must live or
work in GV.
No. However, a
resident can make a
request on behalf of
a non-resident.
No. However, a non-
resident’s request could be
brought forward by a
resident of GV.
BACKGROUND CHECKS
Should background reviews be
conducted on individuals or
organizations that are being
considered for naming or
renaming?
Who should conduct the
background check - staff or an
independent consultant?
Yes
Independent
Consultant
Yes
Independent
Consultant
Yes
Independent Consultant
4
Based on the background
review, if there is information of
concern, who should be
responsible for determining if it
should eliminate the naming
consideration?
Consultant –
Guiding
Commission –
City Council
Recommend creating
a Naming-Renaming
Committee formed
annually in May
with Commissioner
appointments.
Committee would
work directly with
consultant for all
naming/renaming
recommendations for
the City Council. All
requests would be
considered at one
annual meeting.
Consultant and Naming-
Renaming Committee will
make recommendation to
City Council for final
decision.
Note: If a previously named public
asset is determined to have historical
implications or attributes misaligned
with the city’s core values, the City
Council will take action to begin the
renaming process
RUBRICS
Should staff have initial review
criteria/rubric to determine if a
naming or renaming request is
appropriate to move forward for
committe review and
recommendation?
Should there be an application
fee to offset the expense for
review and naming?
Yes
Yes
Yes. Regardless if
minimums are met,
still send to
suggested Naming-
Renaming
Committee for
review.
Yes. Suggested $25.
Yes. A rubric is
recommended to ensure the
minimum requirements are
met before advancing the
naming/renaming request.
Yes. $25 non-refundable fee.
Should a rubric be used by each
commission, with a related
point scale, to determine if a
requested naming or renaming
should move forward to city
council for approval?
No No No.
However, final
recommendation to Council
should include criteria from
the recommending body –
i.e. consultant, Naming-
Renaming Committee, etc.
PUBLIC INPUT
Should public input be taken for
naming a new publicly owned
asset?
Yes
Yes
Yes, both in person
and online.
Yes, both in person and
online.
5
Should public input be taken for
renaming a publicly owned
asset?
Yes, both in person
and online.
Yes, both in person and
online.
FISCAL SPONSORSHIPS OR DONATIONS
Should the city accept fiscal
donations or sponsorships for
naming rights of a specific
publicly owned asset?
If a donation or sponsorship is
accepted, who will determine
the value of the fiscal
commitment?
If a donation or sponsorship is
accepted, who will determine
the time span the name remains
with the asset?
No, but extenuating
circumstances may
allow for some form
of sponsorship
Council with
Consultant
Council with
Consultant
No, however, accept
using “made possible
by” or “funded by.”
Consultant
Consultant
No, not for naming rights.
Consideration could be given
to some form of donation or
sponsorship such as “made
possible by” or “funded by.”
Consultant recommendation
to City Council for final
decision.
Consultant recommendation
to City Council for final
decision.
MEMORIALS
If the naming/renaming will
serve as a memorial, should
there be a waiting period prior
to consideration?
Yes No. Submit to the
Naming-Renaming
Committee for their
annual consideration.
No, if there will be just one
annual meeting pre-
determined for
naming/renaming
consideration.
ROADWAYS
6
Should Golden Valley roads be
considered for renaming?
Should co-naming or honorary
street names be considered
rather than formally changing
the name of streets?
Note: Street renaming has a number of
specific parameters that impact potential
requests for renaming. Examples include:
State highways cannot be renamed by local
municipalities. County roads cannot be
renamed by local municipalities. Generally
roads that are contiguous through many
communities will not be renamed as an
independent section of road.
No
No
Stay open to request
only when needed.
Would consider,
however, not an
automatic fallback.
Yes, if the current name has
negative impact or causes
potential harm, as identified
by residents, the Naming-
Renaming Committee,
Consultant, and City
Council.
Consideration should be
given to co-naming or
honorary naming of streets
with careful review of
rationale. It should be clearly
identified through the
application process whether
it’s a formal or honorary
naming request.
Proposed Naming – Renaming Request Process for
Currently Owned Public Assets
1. Application is available at City Hall (hard copy) and online.
2. Application requires a $25.00 non-refundable fee.
3. Application must be submitted by a resident of Golden Valley.
4. Completed application is submitted to the City Manager’s Office.
5. City Manager office staff reviews application utilizing the rubric to determine if the naming/renaming request
meets minimum requirements to move forward.
6. If application does not meet minimum requirements, letter is sent informing the resident.
7. All applications meeting minimum requirements are then held until the annual meeting of the consultant and
Naming Committee
8. The Naming Committee will meet once annually -an advertised public meeting similar to Commission meetings -
with a pre-determined date, time, and location to review all requests.
9. The Naming Committee meetings are open for residents to attend similar to commission meetings.
10. The consultant will be provided naming applications in advance of the annual meeting to conduct reviews,
research, determine potential impacts, and implement background checks if needed.
11. The Naming Committee will be made up of one representative from each city commission and members will be
appointed annually at the May meeting where the annual commissioner appointments/reappointments are
made.
12. The Naming Committee will work with the consultant liaison to review all requests and research information
provided. The Naming Committee makes recommendations to the City Council to support or not support naming
request(s).
13. City Council will review all recommendations from the Naming Committee. If the recommendation is initially
supported by the City Council, request(s) will be summarized and shared with the residents of Golden Valley for
input and comment on both the website and in hard copy (available at City Hall and Brookview).
14. If the City Council does not support the recommendation, Council will direct staff to gather resident input or
conclude the process.
15. All resident input/comments will be organized and submitted to the City Council for review.
7
16. Based on the resident input, the City Council will then make the final decision on all naming and renaming
requests.
Proposed Naming Process for
New – Recently Acquired Public Assets
1. The City Council requests public input for the naming of a new or recently acquired public asset.
2. Communications advertises for resident input regarding naming ideas for the new public asset. Resident input is
gathered through the city website and through hard copy at City Hall and Brookview.
3. All resident naming input ideas will be organized and provided to the consultant/Naming Committee for the
annual review meeting.
4. The Naming Committee will work with the consultant to review all name submissions and narrow the list to no
more than six options.
5. The consultant will conduct reviews, research, determine potential impacts and implement background checks,
if needed, on the final naming options recommended by the Naming Committee.
6. Final list of naming options with background information will be provided to the City Council for review and
discussion.
7. City Council will then make the final decision on the naming of the new or recently acquired public asset.
General Guidance
1. Golden Valley will consider naming public assets after individuals. The preference would be to have a clear
affiliation between the community and the individual, however this is not mandatory.
2. Potential impacts to residents must be considered when determining the naming or re-naming of a public asset.
3. The independent consultant conducts all research, background checks, and acts as liaison for Naming
Committee meetings.
4. Resident input will be taken on all new naming and renaming of publicly owned assets.
5. Donations and sponsorships will not be accepted for naming rights. City will support fiscal commitments for
recognition when presented as “funded by” or “made possible by”.
6. If needed, the consultant will provide research to guide City Council on the appropriate value for a fiscal
commitment.
7. Naming and renaming requests will only be considered once annually on a pre-determined date.
8. Roads can be considered for renaming only if current name has negative impact or causes potential harm as
identified by residents, appointed officials, elected officials, and staff.
9. Honorary names can be considered for streets however, this should not be an automatic fall back option.
10. Street renaming also has a number of specific parameters that affect potential requests. Local municipalities
cannot rename state highways, interstate freeways and county roads. Generally, roads that are contiguous
through many communities will not be renamed as an independent section of road.
11. Private developers who add new roads in a development generally recommend street names to staff for
approval.
12. If a previously named public asset is determined to have negative historical implications or attributes misaligned
with the city’s core values, the City Council will take immediate action to begin the renaming process.
8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Community Development
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Work Session
September 12, 2023
Agenda Item
2. Home Occupation Regulations
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Summary
The City’s home occupation regulations have remained substantially unchanged since they were
introduced in 1985. Recent advances in work-from-home capabilities following COVID-19 may provide
motivation to revisit and update this section of code.
Background
Until 1985, the official regulations of Golden Valley prohibited any type of home occupation – but in
staff reports from the time it was acknowledged that a number of them existed with little to no
enforcement on the part of the City. A request from a resident to the City Council in 1981 to relax the
regulations generated both wariness from the staff (who felt it was inappropriate to consider
modifying regulations that could impact the city’s residential neighborhoods based on the appeal from
one resident) and interest from the City Council and Planning Commission (who recommended that
staff look into the possibility of making provisions for some home occupations).
In 1984 and 1985, staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council went back and forth for many
months developing language that ultimately allowed home occupations in the Single-Family Zoning
District subject to a number of performance standards (limiting external appearance, hours of
operation, parking, etc.) and specifically permitted or prohibited certain uses. Any home occupation
not listed could be considered only via a conditional use permit. One standard that was clearly
expressed was that no home occupation would be permitted in an accessory building or garage and
that nothing indicative of the home occupation would be allowed outside of the home.
These regulations were amended slightly in 2004 when the list of permitted uses was removed, along
with the option to consider certain uses by conditional use. However, the performance standards
remained (that the occupation take place within the principal structure was one of them). These
standards have not changed in the past 20 years.
Analysis
A stated rational for allowing home occupations when they were first considered in 1984 was the
availability of home computers, which were seen as potentially expanding the ability for individuals to
provide services from their own homes. In a similar vein, the increased capacity to work from home
9
spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 has led to questions of if additional accommodations
should be made to ease limits to home occupations across the city going forward. Being able to
conduct business from an accessory structure or detached home office is one point of consideration.
Staff conducted a quick audit of home occupation regulations across ten metro communities often
viewed as peer cities to Golden Valley. The majority of the standards are very similar to those included
in Golden Valley’s zoning chapter, and eight of the ten had language that specifically restricted the
home occupation to the principal structure. One was less direct but did prohibit external modifications
that changed the residential appearance of the lot, while the other only allowed a home occupation to
locate within an accessory building via an approved conditional use permit. None allowed home
occupation activities to take place outside of a building.
Equity Considerations
Should the Council decide to move forward with an update to the home occupation regulations, staff
believes a robust community engagement process would be necessary to ensure that the views of all
single-family property owners and renters are heard, as the impacts of any changes would have the
potential to be felt across the entire city.
Recommended Action
Staff is looking to the City Council for direction on the home occupation regulations of the zoning
chapter should be evaluated for a potential update.
Supporting Documents
Golden Valley Home Occupation Regulations
Peer City Home Occupation Regulation Audit
10
Home Occupation: An accessory use of a dwelling, excluding an atached garage or other accessory
structure, which is conducted en�rely within the dwelling. (In-home child care licensed by the State is
not considered a home occupa�on.)
Sec�on 113-88. - Single-Family Residen�al (R-1) Zoning District.
Subsec�on (d) Accessory Uses. The following accessory uses shall be permited in the R-1 Zoning District:
(4) Home occupa�ons, as governed by the following requirements:
a. The use of the dwelling for the occupa�on or profession shall be incidental and secondary to the
use of the dwelling for residen�al purposes.
b. The exterior appearance of the structure shall not be altered for the opera�on of the home
occupa�on.
c. There shall be no outside storage or display of signage or anything related to or indica�ve of the
home occupa�on.
d. An accessory structure, including a garage, shall not be used for a home occupa�on.
e. A permited home occupa�on shall not result in noise, fumes, traffic, lights, odor, excessive
sewage or water use or garbage service, electrical, radio, or TV interference in a manner
detrimental to the health, safety, enjoyment, and general welfare of the surrounding residen�al
neighborhood.
f. No physical products shall be displayed or sold on the premises those incidental to the permited
home occupa�on.
g. No signs or symbols shall be displayed other than those permited for residen�al purposes.
h. Clients, deliveries, and other business ac�vity where persons come to the home shall be limited
to the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
i. No more than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the dwelling shall be used for the home
occupa�on.
j. Parking related to the home occupa�on shall be provided only on the driveway of the property
where the home occupa�on operates.
k. A home occupa�on shall not generate more than eight client trips per day and serve no more
than two clients or customers at a �me.
l. There shall only be one outside employee allowed on the premises at which a home occupa�on
is located.
m. All other applicable City, State, and Federal licenses, codes and regula�ons shall be met.
n. The following uses are prohibited home occupa�ons:
1. Repair, service, building, rebuilding or pain�ng of autos, trucks, boats, and other vehicles
2. Repair and service of items that cannot be carried by one person and repair and service of
any item involving an internal combus�on engine or motor
3. Retail sales
4. Medical/dental clinic or similar
5. Restaurants or cafes
6. Animal hospital
7. Veterinary clinic
8. Stable or kennel
9. Funeral home, mortuary, or columbarium; and
10. Sale or repair of firearms.
11
Peer City Home Occupa�on Regula�on Audit
The language below reflects how the loca�ons of home occupa�ons are regulated within the zoning
chapter of ten peer ci�es.
Bloomington: “conducted within a dwelling unit on the premises”; Type 1 may not use or be located in
accessory buildings or garages, Type 2 may have ac�vi�es in accessory buildings or garages if approved
by the Planning Commission via CUP
Edina: “no exterior structural modifica�ons shall be made to change the residen�al character and
appearance of the lot or any buildings or structures on the lot”
Hopkins: “must be conducted en�rely within the principal residen�al building or an allowed accessory
structure”
Minnetonka: “not permited to conduct any of the business in an atached garage or a detached
accessory building or outside of any building”
New Hope: “shall not be allowed in accessory buildings”; registra�on required
Plymouth: “conducted en�rely within the principal dwelling” (but some storage in an accessory structure
allowed)
Richfield: “conducted within a fully enclosed building”
Robbinsdale: “all ac�vity related to the home occupa�on be contained within the principal structure and
not in an accessory building or garage”
Roseville: “shall be conducted en�rely within the dwelling”; registra�on required
St. Louis Park: “no por�on of the home occupa�on is conducted within any atached or detached
accessory building”
12
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Administrative Services
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Work Session
September 12, 2023
Agenda Item
3. Review 2024 Audit Report and Management Letter
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Bill Lauer from Malloy Montague Karnowski Radosevich & Co. will be in attendance to discuss the
2022 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, Management Report and Special Purpose Audit
Reports. His main focus will be reviewing the Management Report document.
2022 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
2022 Management Report
2022 Special Purpose Audit Report
13
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Administrative Services
763-512-2345 / 763-512-2344 (fax)
Golden Valley City Council Work Session
September 12, 2023
Agenda Item
4. Review and Continue Discussion of 2024-2025 Proposed Budgets and 2024-2032 Proposed Capital
Improvement Program.
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Staff will give a presentation on the 2024-2025 Proposed Biennial Budget and 2024-2033 Capital
Improvement Program. This amount will be used for the Proposed 2024 Property Tax Statement that
is sent out Mid-November to all parcels. The preliminary levies will be discussed along with the
proposed tax impact on the median home value. From this discussion staff will prepare the
preliminary levy and budget to be approved on September 19, 2023. The final levy and budget will be
approved on December 5, 2023.
Recommended Action
Council should give direction to staff for the 2024 Proposed Levy and 2024-2025 Proposed Budget.
This budget and levy will be approved on September 19 for the 2024 Proposed Property Tax
Statements.
Supporting Documents
Resolution 23-XX Adopting Proposed 2024-25 Budget and Proposed Tax Levies Payable in
2024.pdf
14
RESOLUTION 23-XX
ADOPTING THE PROPOSED 2024-25 BUDGET AND
PROPOSED TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2024
WHEREAS, State Law requires the certification of a proposed budget and proposed
tax levies no later than September 30, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has met and discussed the proposed budget and tax
levy; and
WHEREAS, the debt service levy as established in the bond documents for the
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016C (B2822), the amount of $393,710.63 will not be
levied in 2024 due to the utilization of the franchise fees collected from gas and electric
utilities, and
WHEREAS, the debt service levy as established in the bond documents for the
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017B (B2825A), the amount of $21,276.77 will not be
levied due to the utilization of the internal state aid monies, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that there is hereby levied upon all taxable
property located within the City of Golden Valley the following amounts:
General Tax Levy $26,778,525
Bonded Debt Levy:
Brookview Center 1,214,600
Street Improvement Bonds 5,129,305
TOTAL Tax Levy $33,122,430
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Clerk shall certify to the Hennepin County
Auditor a copy of this resolution approving the property tax levies for collection in 2024 for
the City of Golden Valley.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed 2024 budget of the General Fund
is $30,110,690 and the proposed 2024 budget is approved in concept only.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council declares its intent to take all
necessary actions legally permissible to the submission and approval of the City’s budget
and property tax levies both proposed and final.
_____________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
15
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following
voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
16
Review of Future Draft Agendas
Meeting & Item Info
September 19, 2023 Special City Council Meeting (commission interviews) (tentative) - Time TBD
Commissioner Interviews
Discussion Regarding Appointments
Adjournment
September 19, 2023 HRA Meeting - 6:30 PM
Consent Agenda
Approval of HRA minutes
Receive and File Previous Quarter's Financial Reports
Public Hearing
Old Business
New Business
Public Input and Approve Proposed HRA Fund Budget & Levy
September 19, 2023 City Council Meeting - 6:30 PM
1A - Pledge of Allegiance and Land Acknowledgement
Presentation
New Employee Introductions
Proclamation Honoring September 15 - October 15, 2023 as Hispanic and Latine Heritage Month
Consent - City Check Registers
Approval of City Check Registers
Consent - Licenses
License - THC Retail Establishments License Renewals
Consent - Boards, Commissions, and Task Forces
Board/Commission Appointments
Amend Planning Commission Work Plan
Consent - Bid, Quotes, and Contracts
Approve Preliminary Engineering Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad for Crossing Replacement at Golden Valley Road
Approve School Resource Officer Agreement with ISD 281
Consent - Grants and Donations
Consent - Miscellaneous
Set Date for Proposed Property Tax Levy Payable 2024 and 2024-2025 Budget
Approve Update to City's Data Practices Policies, Resolution
Appointment of Election Judges and AB Ballot Board for Municipal Election - Resolution
Public Hearing
Old Business
New Business
Public Input & Adopt Preliminary Budget and Tax Levy - Resolution
October 3, 2023 Special City Council Meeting (Closed Session) - Time TBD
Discussion regarding real estate negotiations for the fire station (Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, Subd. 3(c))
October 3, 2023 City Council Meeting - 6:30 PM
1A - Pledge of Allegiance and Land Acknowledgement
Presentation
Proclamation - Recognizing October 10th as Indigenous Peoples Day
Consent - Council Minutes
Approval of all September Council minutes
Consent - City Check Registers
Approval of City Check Registers
Consent - Licenses
17
Meeting & Item Info
Consent - Boards, Commissions, and Task Forces
Consent - Bid, Quotes, and Contracts
Minneapolis Water Agreement
Consent - Grants and Donations
Resolution to Accept Donation from the Golden Valley Crime Prevention Fund for Trunk or Treat Event
Consent - Miscellaneous
Adopt Resolution of Support for the CP Rail Preferred Route
Appointment of Additional Election Judges and Student Judges for Municipal Election - Resolution
Approve Waiver of Public Hearing and Certification of Special Assessments 2023 PMP Sanitary Sewer Repairs
Approve Waiver of Public Hearing and Certification of Special Assessments 2023 PMP Driveways
Public Hearing
Special Assessments - Delinquent Utility Bills - Resolution
Special Assessments - Miscellaneous Charges - Resolution
Old Business
New Business
October 10, 2023 City Council Work Session - 6:30 PM
Reconsideration and Recommendation for South Tyrol Park Play Structure
Annual check in with GVCF
Annual Fee Schedule Review
Discussion - Cannabis
Council Review of Future Draft Agendas
October 17, 2023 City Council Meeting - 6:30 PM
1A - Pledge of Allegiance and Land Acknowledgement
Presentation
New Employee Introductions
Minneapolis Regional Chamber Update
Consent - City Check Registers
Approval of City Check Registers
Consent - Licenses
Consent - Boards, Commissions, and Task Forces
Consent - Bid, Quotes, and Contracts
Consent - Grants and Donations
Consent - Miscellaneous
Approve Pavement Management Policy Revisions
Public Hearing
Outdoor Service Area Extension for 7345 Country Club Dr (Schuller's)
Old Business
New Business
18