2008-2009 PMP feasibility report
.
.
t
t
,
J
.
It
.
t
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
Feasibility Report
2008 and 2009 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 08-01 and 09-01
FEASIBILITY REPORT
CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 08-01 and 09-01
2008-09 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under Minnesota State Statu s
Section 326.02 to 326.16.
..
Jeffrey A. Oliver, PE
Reg. Number 23110
Date: FefS. 1ft ~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction............................................................................................................ Page 1
Project Legal Description....................................................................................... Page 1
Existing Conditions................................................................................................ PClge 2
Sanitary Sewer................................................................................................... Page 2
I nflow and Infiltration....................................................................................... Page 2
Sewer Mains................................................................................................... Page 3
Sanitary Sewer Services................................................................................ Page 4
Water Main......................................................................................................... Page 4
Storm Water Drainage....................................................................................... Page 4
Bassett Creek................................................................................................. Page 4
Lilac Drive....................................................................................................... Page 6
Scott A venue Extension................................................................................. Page 6
Duluth Street Storm Sewer............................................................................. Page 6
Bassett Creek Drive Area............................................................................... Page 6
Streets................................................................................................................ Page 7
Street Widths.................................................................................................. Page 7
Pavement Sections............,............................................................................ Page 7
Subgrade Conditions............................................ .......................... ................ Page 8
Environmental Concerns................................................................................ Page 8
Concrete Curb and Gutter.............................................................................. Page 9
Pedestrian Facilities....................................................................................... Page 9
Proposed Improvements....... ..................... ...... ........... ......................... ............... Page 10
Project Phasing............................................................................................ Page 10
Public Participation....................................................................................... Page 10
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main ...................................................................... Page 11
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation ...................................................................... Page 11
Sanitary Sewer Service Rehabilitation.......................................................... Page 12
Watermain Rehabilitation............................................................................. Page 13
Storm Water Management............................................................................... Page 14
Water Quality Improvements........................................................................ Page 14
Scott A venue................................................................................................ Page 14
Regent A venue and Westbend Road........................................................... Page 15
Other Water Quality Measures..................................................................... Page 16
Streets.............................................................................................................. Page 16
Pavement Overlays ............ ........................ .... .......... ... ......... ................. ....... Page 16
Street Widths..............................................................................................;. Page 17
Traffic Control............................................................................................... Page 18
Subgrade Corrections................................................................................... Page 18
Concrete Curb and Gutter............................................................................ Page 19
Alternate Curb Types................... ....................................... ....... ................... Page 20
Traffic Issues and Intersection Layouts ........................................................ Page 20
Triton Drive and Scott Avenue:..................................................................... Page 21
Quail Avenue and Dona Lane: ..................................................................... Page 21
Orchard Avenue and Ordway: ...................................................................... Page 21
Westbend Road and Ordway: ...................................................................... Page 21
Regent Avenue and Westbend Road ........................................................... Page 22
Pedestrian Facilities..................................................................................... Page 23
Culver Road: ..................... ........................ .............. .............. ....................... Page 24
Regent Avenue:............................................................................................ Page 25
Street Lighting.............................................................................................. Page 27
Tree and Landscape Impacts....................................................................... Page 27
Driveway Reconstruction Program ............................................................... Page 28
Estimated Costs and Project Financing........................................................:...... Page 28
Estimated Project Costs................................................................................... Page 28
Sewer and Water Costs................................................................................ Page 29
Storm Drainage Costs.................................................................................. Page 29
Street Reconstruction Costs......................................................................... Page 29
Total Project Costs........ ....................................... ........................................ Page 30
Proposed Project Financing ..................................... ............................ ............ Page 30
Special Assessments................................................................................... Page 30
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund .................................................................. Page 31
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund.................................................................. Page 31
Street Improvement Funds ........................................................................... Page 31
Financing Summary...................................................................................... Page 31
Summary and Recommendations....................................................................... Page 32
Utility Improvements..................................................................................... Page 32
Storm Drainage Improvements.................... ... .... ........ ........... ....................... Page 33
Street Improvements.................................................................................... Page 33
Recommendations............................................................................................... Page 33
11
Introduction
At its October 3,2006 meeting, the Golden Valley City Council authorized preparation of
a feasibility report for the rehabilitation of streets for the 2008-2009 Pavement
Management Program (PMP). The proposed project includes rehabilitation of
approximately 7.5 miles of residential streets and 0.5 miles of Municipal State Aid Street
(MSAS) that are located east of Trunk Highway 100, north of Duluth Street, west of
Noble Avenue and south of the City Limits. The proposed project is shown on Exhibit 1:
Project Location Map.
Culver Road between Noble Avenue and Lilac Drive (east TH 100 frontage road) is the
MSAS street within this project. MSAS streets are eligible for funding from the State of
Minnesota if the street is reconstructed according to State Aid standards. These
standards include street widths, parking restrictions, structural requirements, as well as
vertical and horizontal alignment.
This feasibility report will discuss the existing conditions of the sanitary sewer, water
mains, storm sewer and streets within the project area. In addition, the report will
discuss the proposed project design, estimated project costs and the proposed
financing, including a preliminary special assessment roll.
The proposed 2008-2009 PMP will include the overlay of existing asphalt pavement on
several roadways outside of the project area. Mendelssohn Avenue betw~en Plymouth
Avenue and Medicine Lake Road; and Scott and Toledo Avenues adjacent to the
southern portion of the project are briefly discussed in this report, but are not included in
the financial sections of the report because of separate funding sources for these
projects.
Proiect Legal Description
The proposed project includes:
All properties in Sections 7 and 18, Township 29, Range 24; within the City of Golden
Valley, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that are adjacent to the following streets:
. Bassett Creek Drive: Regent Avenue North to Noble Avenue North
. Cherokee Place: Culver Hoad to Normandy Place
. Culver Road (MSAS): Lilac Drive North East Frontage Road to Noble Avenue North
. Dawnview Terrace: Lilac Drive North East Frontage Road to Scott Avenue North
. Dawnview Terrace: Regent Avenue North to Noble Avenue North
. Dona Lane: Quail Avenue North to Orchard Avenue North
. Drake Road: Quail Avenue North to cul-de-sac
. Glenden Terrace: Triton Drive to Scott Avenue North
. Hampton Road: Scott Avenue North to Regent Avenue North
. Lowry Terrace: Lilac Drive North East Frontage Road to Quail Avenue North
1
. Marie Lane East: Perry Avenue North to Orchard Avenue North
. Marie Lane West: Scott Avenue North to Regent Avenue North
. Markay Ridge: Windsor Way to Orchard Avenue North
. Minnaqua Drive: cul-de-sac to Regent Avenue North
. Normandy Place: Quail Avenue North to Perry Avenue North
. Orchard Avenue North: Ordway to Markay Ridge
. Orchard Avenue North: Marie Lane East to Dawnview Terrace
. Ordway: Golden Valley Road to Noble Avenue North
. Perry Avenue North: Westbend Road to Markay Ridge
. Perry Avenue North: Bassett Creek Drive to Marie Lane East
. Perry Avenue North: Culver Road to Triton Drive
. Quail Avenue North: Bassett Creek Drive to 34th Avenue North
. Regent Avenue North: Golden Valley Road to 34th Avenue North
. Scott Avenue North: cul-de-sac to Regent Avenue North
. Scott Avenue North: Dawnview Terrace to Triton Drive
. Scott Avenue North: Lowry Terrace to Lilac Drive North East Frontage Road
. Sorell Avenue: Regent Avenue North to Ordway
. Triton Drive: Lilac Drive North East Frontage Road to Regent Avenue North
. Westbend Road: Scott Avenue North to Ordway
. Windsor Way: Westbend Road to Markay Ridge
. 33rd Avenue North: Scott Avenue North to Noble Avenue North
Existing Conditions
Sanitary Sewer
Inflow and Infiltration
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) provides wastewater
treatment and interceptor collection services for the Twin Cities metropolitan
area. The MCES has recently undertaken a major effort to eliminate excess peak
flows in its system that exceed the capacity of the collection and treatment
facilities. These excess flows can and do result in overflows of raw sewage into
the Mississippi River. Inflow and Infiltration (III) is defined as clear water that is
either directly discharged (inflow) or indirectly discharged (infiltration) into the
sanitary sewer system. Among the most common sources are improperly
connected sump pumps or foundation drains discharging into the sanitary sewer
and the infiltration of ground water through defects in sanitary sewer mains,
services and manholes.
The City of Golden Valley is one of approximately 46 cities that have been
notified by the MCES that there are excess peak sanitary sewer flows being
generated by their community.
2
The peak flows in Golden Valley typically follow heavy rainfall events, indicating
that improper connections to the sewer system may be present, and that sewers
in low areas may allowing ground water and surface water into the system
through cracked pipes, leaking manholes and substandard castings.
Sewer Mains
The existing sanitary sewer system within the project area is primarily local
lateral sewers that were constructed in the late 1950's when sanitary sewer was
first available in Golden Valley. These lateral sanitary sewer mains are typically
nine-inch diameter clay pipes. However, there are isolated areas of cast iron and
ductile iron pipe sewers, primarily within the portions of the project area where
there are poor soils and the sanitary sewers were installed on piling.
There is a 3D-inch diameter MCES interceptor sewer that passes through the
project area. This pipe enters the project area near the west end of Minnaqua
Drive where the line passes beneath Bassett Creek. The MCES trunk line is
within the Minnaqua Drive right of way between Bassett Creek and Regent
Avenue, where it continues eastward along the bank of Bassett Creek. The
MCES line leaves this project area as it continues eastward under Noble Avenue
along Bassett Creek.
There is a City of Golden Valley trunk sanitary sewer line within Regent Avenue
in the project area. This 12 inch diameter concrete pipe begins at the MCES
interceptor line near Minnaqua Drive and extends northward to Triton Drive. The
entire project area north of Minnaqua Drive is tributary to this City trunk sanitary
sewer.
A closed circuit television inspection was performed on all the City's sanitary
sewer mains within the project area as part of the preliminary project design. This
inspection was intended to locate the extent and severity of the defects to the
sanitary sewer system to determine if repairs are needed as part of the street
reconstruction project. The television inspection has identified distresses within
the City system that are consistent with the age and pipe material. The defects in
the clay pipes include cracked pipes, root intrusion and offset joints. There is also
evidence of groundwater infiltration into the sewer system.
The sanitary sewer inspection identified a significant sag, or pipe settlement, in
the sanitary sewer pipe on Lowry Terrace near the intersection of Scott Avenue
on the north side of Gearty Park. This sag, which is estimated to be in excess of
six inches, is in a portion of sanitary sewer that was constructed on piling when it
was installed in 1958. Furthermore, there were problems with this sanitary sewer
and a portion of the pipe and piling was removed and replaced in 1968. Based
upon the available information from the sanitary sewer inspection it appears that
the settlement identified at this time is within the portion of the pipe that was
previously repaired.
3
Sanitary Sewer Services
As part of its III Reduction Program, the City is offering the residents within this
project area an opportunity to have a Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)
inspection performed on the sanitary sewer service at their home. The property
owners are not being charged for this voluntary inspection, which is identical to
the Point of Sale Inspections required by City Code. The intent of this inspection
is to identify III issues present in the private sanitary sewer services and allow
property owners to make informed decisions regarding rehabilitation of the
service lines, including voluntary participation in the repair program offered as
part of the PMP project. This sewer service repair program will be discussed in
more detail later in this report.
Water Main
The majority of the existing water main system within the project area consists of lateral
mains that were installed during the 1960s. These six-inch diameter cast iron pipe
mains are typically within the existing City owned street rights-of-way.
There is one City-owned trunk water main located within the project area. This main is a
12-inch diameter pipe that is located within the City owned right-of-way for Culver Road.
A review of water main maintenance records within the project area indicates there are
several areas with greater than anticipated water main break frequency. These areas
include in the vicinity of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road; and the area near Scott
Avenue, Hampton Road and Marie Lane West.
The watermain within Scott Avenue between Culver Road and Triton Drive was
replaced in the late 1990's. This watermain replacement was an emergency repair that
was required due to a significant number of consecutive water main breaks, including
several breaks within a one day period. There have been no watermain breaks or
repairs needed within this portion of Scott Avenue since the pipe was replaced.
Storm Water Drainage
The entire proposed project area is within the Main-stem sub-district of the Bassett
Creek Watershed. With the main stem of Bassett Creek passing through the southern
portion of the project area, this project also has a significant number of trunk storm
water facilities within its boundaries. The following is a brief discussion of the existing
storm water facilities within the project area.
Bassett Creek
Bassett Creek enters the project area near the intersection of Dawnview Terrace
and Lilac Drive (east frontage road of TH 100). The creek flows towards the
south parallel to TH 100 until it reaches Minnaqua Pond, where the flow heads to
the east under Regent Avenue just south of Minnaqua Drive. After passing
beneath Regent Avenue, Bassett Creek continues eastward until it leaves the
project area when it passes under Noble Avenue.
4
There is an extensive flood plain associated with Bassett Creek within the project
area. The Briarwood Nature Area, south of Culver Road and west of Regent
Avenue, is a major flood storage area for the Bassett Creek Watershed. This
flood plain extends southward from the Briarwood area to include Minnaqua
Pond and the intersection of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road. This
intersection is closed on a regular basis due to flooding.
Until recently, there were also approximately 12 homes within the project area
that were within the 1 % Flood Plain of Bassett Creek, and therefore were subject
to frequent flooding. A number of other homes within this area had previously
been removed from the flood plain due the efforts of the Bassett Creek Water
Management Commission (BCWMC) and the US Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) flood control project. At the time the project was implemented it included
structural flood proofing of individual homes, but this aspect of the project was
eliminated by the Corps due to a low benefit/cost ratio.
In 2002, the City of Golden Valley and the consulting engineering firm of SEH,
Inc. completed a Flood Damage Reduction Study that re-evaluated the flood
proofing of the homes remaining in the flood plain. This study included
recommendations for protecting these homes from further damage. Following the
completion of the Flood Damage Reduction Study, the BCWMC and the City
initiated a program to assist homeowners financially in the structural flood
proofing of their homes. Seven of the owners of flood prone properties in the
project area participated in this program.
In addition, during the process of evaluating structural flood proofing of individual
homes, it was determined that acquisition and demolition of four homes was the
best method available for flood damage reduction. Based upon this
determination, Flood Damage Reduction Grants from the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources were obtained, and four homes were acquired and
removed. Three of these homes were within this project area on Scott Avenue
near the intersection of Hampton Road.
Based upon these flood damage reduction efforts, there is currently one home
within the city and project area that is still within the flood plain of Bassett Creek.
However, there are a number of homes that are marginally above the base flood
elevation. Therefore, the minimization of flood plain impacts with this project is of
high importance.
There are no existing water quality ponds or facilities within this project area to
treat storm water runoff before it is discharged into Bassett Creek.
5
Lilac Drive
There is an existing 84 inch diameter storm sewer located within Lilac Drive
immediately adjacent to this project. This storm sewer, which conveys storm
water runoff from the Cities of Crystal and Golden Valley to Bassett Creek, was
installed by Golden Valley in 1976. Existing lateral storm sewer extensions flow
into this trunk facility at Scott Avenue and Lowry Terrace.
In the late 1990's, the BCWMC and the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MNDOT) installed a low flow diverter in the 84 inch trunk storm sewer. The work
was started by the BCWMC as part of the flood control project in Crystal's
Bassett Creek Park, and completed by MNDOT as part of the TH 100
reconstruction project. This diverter directs runoff from smaller, more frequent
rainfalls under TH 100 into Bassett Creek Park pond for nutrient and sediment
removal. These small, frequent storms typically carry the majority of the nutrient
and sediment loading that impact our water bodies. High flows within the culvert,
which typically have less water quality impact, are routed directly into Bassett
Creek.
Scott A venue Extension
In 1987 the City of Golden Valley installed a significant trunk storm sewer
through the northern portion of the project area to address localized, historical
drainage problems. This trunk storm sewer extends from Bassett Creek near
Lilac Drive and Dawnview Terrace to the north along Scott Avenue, then along
Lowry Terrace to the north of Gearty Park. From the Gearty Park area the storm
sewer extends northward through the center of the project area. This trunk storm
sewer provides storm water drainage for much of the project area north of
Dawnview Terrace.
Duluth Street Storm Sewer
There is an existing 58 inch diameter trunk storm sewer in the southern portion of
the project area that conveys storm water runoff from Duluth Street and portions
of TH 100 into Bassett Creek. This storm sewer is located in rear yards between
Regent and Toledo Avenues, and in the right-of-way of Scott Avenue, and
discharges into Minnaqua Pond at the intersection of Scott Avenue and
Westbend Road.
Bassett Creek Drive Area
The portion of the project located north of Bassett Creek, between Noble and
Regent Avenues and south of Dawnview Terrace is drained via an existing storm
sewer system that discharges into the creek in the vicinity of Bassett Creek Drive
and Perry Avenue.
6
Streets
The streets within the proposed project area are local streets that were originally
constructed as development occurred. The original date of construction varied from the
late 1940's along Culver Road, to 1950's and early 1970's in the rest of the project area.
Culver Road between Noble Avenue and Lilac Drive is included within the City of
Golden Valley's Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) system. The Municipal and County
State Aid systems were created by the State of Minnesota in 1959 to help provide
funding to cities and counties for important non-highway portions of the transportation
system, typically the collector and arterial roadways that connect to the highway system.
In order to insure that these MSAS roadways meet the goals of the State Aid program,
the State has provided funding from a portion of the gas tax to finance construction,
provided certain construction standards are met.
Regent Avenue, which parallels Trunk Highway 100 and Noble Avenue through the
project area is not on the MSAS system. However, based upon its connections to the
City of Crystal and Duluth Street (County Road 66), it carries higher than anticipated
traffic volumes than most local residential streets and can be considered a local
collector street. Traffic on Regent Avenue varies between approximately 900 and 2000
vehicles per day, which is within the anticipated traffic range for local collector
roadways.
The first pavement on the streets built in the 1940's and early 1950's was likely a "road
mix" pavement consisting of oil sprayed on the gravel surface that was mixed and
compacted. This road mix pavement method was commonly used in this area during the
time frame that some of the earliest streets in this project area were constructed. As
utilities were installed under these roadways in the late 1950's, the road mix was
patched or replaced with a paved asphalt surface.
Street Widths
The majority of the streets are between 26 and 30 feet wide. However, street
widths can vary depending upon the location on any given roadway. The
narrowest portion of street is approximately 23 feet wide on Culver Road
between Regent and Quail Avenues, and the widest street is approximately 34
feet on Regent Avenue in the vicinity of Gearty Park.
Pavement Sections
All the streets within the proposed project area have existing bituminous
pavement. The depth of the existing pavement varies from approximately 1.5
inches on Windsor Way; to a maximum thickness of 9 inches on Regent Avenue
near Westbend Road. The average depth of existing pavement is approximately
four inches.
Properly constructed asphalt streets are built with the pavement placed on a
granular (gravel) material that is considered to be part of the pavement section.
7
The soil borings taken within this project appear to have a consistent presence of
a granular base material, although there are streets north of Culver Road where
there is no identifiable base present. Much of the material deemed to be granular
base is silty-sand and silty-gravel, which is an indicator that the material was "pit
run" gravel that was commonly used for base material during the general time
frame these streets and the utilities were constructed. The presence of silt
material makes the granular base susceptible to deflections due to moisture and
frost. Consequently the base tends to be unstable under traffic loads when wet,
especially during freeze/thaw conditions.
The pavement distresses present within the project area are consistent with the
age of the streets. Common pavement distresses include longitudinal and
transverse cracking, alligator cracking, edge cracking and patching. Patching is
frequently used to cover severe distresses such as alligator cracking, and is
therefore indicative of poor pavement quality.
Subgrade Conditions
As part of the preliminary design for the proposed project, a series of 61 soil
borings were taken to determine the suitability of the existing subgrade materials
for street construction. These soil borings were also the source of the pavement
and base thicknesses of the streets.
The soil borings indicate fill was placed beneath the base material throughout the
project area. The use of fill is common during the development of subdivisions
when streets are built. This fill material generally consists of silty sand, clayey
sand and sandy clay.
The soil borings identified possible buried topsoil in five locations. The presence
of topsoil indicates that the streets were constructed by placing fill or granular
material directly on native soils with no regard for long term street performance.
Topsoil typically has a high presence of clayey and organic soils that are
moisture and frost susceptible.
Organic soils and swamp deposits were identified in seven of the soil borings.
The locations with organic soil or swamp deposits present are near the
intersection of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road, and on many of the streets
west of Regent Avenue. The swamp deposits typically consist of mixtures of
peat, organic clay and organic silt; all of which are typically water bearing and
considered to be highly compressible under loading.
Environmental Concerns
While the soil borings were being taken for this project, a chemical odor was
detected in the boring on Scott Avenue near Hampton Road. Buried debris was
also identified in this boring. It is recommended that the extent and nature of any
possible contamination at this location be determined prior to removing fill or
excavating.
8
A study to determine the cause and extent of this odor is currently being
undertaken. Findings from this study will be incorporated into the project design.
Buried debris was also encountered in one of the soil borings on Regent Avenue
north of Bassett Creek Drive. There was no chemical odor detected at this boring
location.
During past PMP projects there have been several occurrences of buried debris,
primarily construction related materials such as brick, concrete, asphalt and
timbers, have been encountered. This material is typically encountered in low
areas that were filled as development occurred. The contract and specifications
for all PMP projects now include a contingency plan for dealing with buried debris
should it be unexpectedly encountered during construction.
Concrete Curb and Gutter
There is very limited existing concrete curb and gutter on streets within this
project area. The vast majority of these streets have a rolled bituminous curb that
was typically constructed by pouring extra asphalt off the edge of the paver when
the street was originally built.
Pedestrian Facilities
There are currently no existing sidewalks within the proposed project area.
However, there is an existing asphalt trail located south of Dawnview Terrace
between Lilac Drive and Scott Avenue. This existing trail is located within the
City's Briarwood Bird Sanctuary, and extends south along the east side of
Bassett Creek. After the trail crosses Bassett Creek it extends north and south
along Lilac Drive, and connects to the Trunk Highway 100 pedestrian bridge.
The area surrounding the proposed project area has a number of existing
pedestrian facilities. Among these facilities is:
. the pedestrian bridge crossing TH 100;
. an asphalt trail extending from the pedestrian bridge southward along
Lilac Drive, Unity Avenue and along the west side of Minnaqua Pond;
. a pedestrian bridge across Bassett Creek at Minnaqua Drive;
. sidewalks and trails along Duluth Street/Golden Valley Road;
. sidewalk on Noble Avenue.
. sidewalk on the west side of Regent Avenue north of 34th Avenue in the
City of Crystal.
The existing pedestrian system adjacent to the project area is shown on Exhibit
4: Existing and Proposed Trail System.
9
Proposed Improvements
This portion of the feasibility report will focus on the proposed design of the project. The
estimated project costs and project financing will be discussed later in this report.
Proiect Phasinq
Due to the size of this project, which consists of approximately 8 miles of streets,
it is proposed to construct the project over the 2008 and 2009 construction
seasons, using two separate construction contracts. As shown on Exhibit 3:
Proposed Construction Phasing, the portion of the project area that includes
Culver Road, Scott Avenue and Dawnview Terrace near Lilac Drive, and all the
streets north of Culver Road, is proposed for construction during the summer of
2008. All remaining streets located south of Culver Road are to be constructed
during the summer of 2009.
The proposed 2008 portion of this project will continue to be City Improvement
Project 08-01; and the proposed 2009 portion of the project will become City
Improvement Project 09-01.
Public Participation
As part of the preliminary design process for the 2008-2009 Pavement
Management Program, two sets of project open houses were held. The first open
houses occurred in May of 2007, and the second was held in November 2007. At
the first meetings, residents were provided with general information regarding the
Pavement Management Program, and were able to express concerns and ask
questions regarding the proposed project. Residents who were not able to attend
the first open houses were mailed all the information that was distributed at the
meetings.
It should be noted that open house attendance, and all written comments
received at or following the open house meetings, is summarized in Appendix A:
Summary of Resident Comments. Written comments that were contained on the
curb surveys, which will be discussed later in this review, are also included in
Appendix A. These written comments are an important tool for staff to identify
issues that need to be addressed as part of the project design.
The comments received by staff relating to the proposed sidewalk on Culver
Road are contained in Appendix 0: Regent Avenue and Culver Road Sidewalk
Comments.
At the second open houses, residents were able to view the preliminary project
design, including anticipated impacts to landscaping, trees, driveways, etc. The
results of the curb preference survey were also available for property owners to
review.
10
Information regarding the Driveway Reconstruction Program and the Inflow and
Infiltration Sewer Service Inspection Program was also available at these
meetings.
Additional issue specific meetings for residents located in the project area were
held during the preliminary design process. These meetings are discussed in
more detail later within this portion of the feasibility report.
The proposed project improvements that are discussed in this portion of the feasibility
report are shown on Exhibits 2A through 2V: Proposed Project Layouts.
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
As discussed earlier in this report, a television inspection of the existing sanitary
sewer system was performed during the preliminary design portion of this project.
Based upon the results of this survey, it has been determined that approximately
40 percent of the sanitary sewer mains within the project are in need of repair.
The nature of the defects present, primarily cracked pipes and root intrusion,
does not indicate a need to excavate and replace most of the sewer mains. It has
been determined that sanitary sewer lining will be effective in repairing the
defects in most of the sewer mains, and will be effective in addressing the
infiltration issues within the City system.
In addition to lining the sanitary sewer mains, this project will incorporate other
measures to reduce the amount of Inflow and Infiltration being introduced into the
City's sewer main system. These III reduction efforts include the replacement of
all sanitary sewer manhole castings and covers; the reconstruction of many
sanitary sewer manholes, and the sealing of sanitary sewer manholes. These
measures have been implemented in past PMP projects, and are consistent with
the City's efforts to address all sources of III.
As previously discussed, the sag identified in the sanitary sewer on Lowry
Terrace east of Scott Avenue is significant enough that more that half of the pipe
is submerged. Therefore, this portion of sanitary sewer, estimated to be 120 feet
long, must be removed and replaced as part of this project. The replacement of
this sanitary sewer will include the installation of new piling to support the pipe
and greatly reduce the risk of future settlement of the sewer.
In order to best address the inflow and infiltration issue, it is desirable to
maximize the lining of sanitary sewer mains within the project area. Therefore,
the construction contracts for 2008 and 2009 will include a per foot bid for
sanitary sewer lining, which will provide the City with the ability to add additional
lining if bidding is favorable and as the budget allows.
11
Sanitary Sewer Service Rehabilitation
As discussed earlier in this report, property owners within the 2008 project area
were given the opportunity to voluntarily have their sanitary sewer service
inspected as part of this project and the City's ongoing Inflow and Infiltration (1/1)
Reduction Program. Approximately 55% of the property owners in the 2008
portion of the proposed project have chosen to participate in this sewer service
inspection program. The intent of this voluntary inspection, which was provided at
no cost to property owners, was to identify sources of 1/1 on the privately owned
sanitary sewer services. It was also intended to let the property owners know
what they would need to repair on their sewer service in order to become
compliant with City Code. Each of the property owners can use the information
provided in the inspection to plan for future sewer service repairs, including
participation in the sewer service repair program offered as part of the proposed
project.
Residents in the 2009 portion of this project will be given the opportunity to have
their sanitary sewer service inspected beginning in March of 2008.
Each property owner, including those who did not participate in the voluntary
inspection program, will be given the opportunity to have repairs performed on
their sanitary sewer service as part of the project. The repair program includes
the opportunity to have the 30 foot long portion of the service from the sanitary
sewer main towards the house repaired by the City's contractor, and to have the
option of having the cost for this 30 foot long repair specially assessed against
the property. If repairs are needed on the sewer service that are outside of the
scope for the City program, the contact information for the City's contractor will
be forwarded to the homeowner. Each homeowner wishing to have additional
repairs done must contact the contractor independently and make arrangements
for these repairs.
The primary method of sanitary sewer service repair included with this project will
be pipe lining. The pipe lining method is preferred due to scheduling concerns
and the risk of trench settlement on new streets when excavation and pipe
replacement is utilized. However, excavation and pipe replacement will be
available for instances where it is determined to be the appropriate sewer service
repair method.
12
Based upon the concerns with removal and replacement sanitary sewer service
repairs, this type of repair will only be offered to homeowners in instances where
a sewer service liner cannot be installed. The typical situations where service
liners cannot be installed include crushed pipe and dropped connections to the
sewer main. If excavation repairs are offered to property owners the costs will
include all removals needed for the work, but will not include replacement of any
trees, shrubs, landscaping, walks or other privately owned items removed or
impacted. Each homeowner will be responsible for the replacement of these
items if they choose.
Watermain Rehabilitation
Based upon water system maintenance records, it has been determined that the
existing six-inch diameter cast iron water main on in the vicinity of Regent
Avenue and Westbend Road must be replaced as part of this project. The
proposed watermain replacement includes portions of Westbend Road, Regent
Avenue, and Scott Avenue as shown on Exhibit 2N. The replacement of this
water main will utilize high density polyethylene pipe that can be directional bored
into place if needed, is flexible and not susceptible to corrosion, making it an
ideal pipe material in locations with poor soil and where settlement is likely. In
addition, a temporary water supply system will be required to provide water to the
homes in this area during water main replacement.
In order to further minimize the potential for future watermain breaks, leaks and
maintenance issues along Westbend Road, it is recommended that the portion of
watermain on Westbend Road between Regent and Scott Avenues be relocated.
The City of Golden Valley owns a tax forfeit property in the southwest corner of
Regent Avenue and Westbend Road. As discussed later in this report, it is
proposed to utilize this City owned property for water quality improvements.
However, the proposed storm water quality improvements will utilize
approximately the northern two-thirds of the property. Therefore, it is
recommended that the Westbend Road watermain be relocated into the southern
portion of the City owned property.
As shown on Exhibit 2N, the proposed watermain extension across the City
owned property will be approximately 20 to 25 feet north of the south property
line. In order to provide access for future maintenance of the watermain it is also
recommended that the pedestrian trail connection, to be discussed later in this
report, between Minnaqua Pond and Regent Avenue, also be placed within the
City owned property and over the watermain. The actual location of the
watermain installation on the City owned property will be determined in the field
in order to minimize the removal of trees.
In addition to the above water main replacements, localized repair and
replacement of gate valves, hydrants and water main fittings is anticipated
throughout the project area.
13
As with past PMP projects, a sump discharge drainage system is proposed
throughout the project area as needed. This sump discharge drainage system
consists of a piping system behind the curb and a service stub for potential
connection of private sump pump discharges. The sump discharge drainage
system is proposed for locations where a significant number of sump pumps are
present and an alternative to above ground and sanitary sewer discharge is
needed.
Storm Water Manaaement
The entire 2008-2009 Pavement Management project is located within the main stem
sub-district of the Bassett Creek Watershed. Therefore, the construction project will be
designed in accordance with the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission
(BCWMC) Requirements for Improvements and Development Proposals. This includes
the implementation of storm water best management practices (BMPs) as part of the
project design and during construction.
The proposed storm drainage improvements within the project area are shown on
Exhibits 2A through 2V. The proposed improvements are primarily lateral extensions of
the existing storm sewer system to facilitate drainage of streets, rights-of-way and
adjacent properties to the extent possible. In addition, several opportunities are present
within the project area for water quality improvements.
Water Qualitv Improvements
As part of the preliminary design of this project, opportunities to improve the
water quality of Bassett Creek were investigated. This investigation began with
the locations identified in the Golden Valley Surface Water Management Plan,
which include the tax forfeit properties at Regent Avenue and Westbend Road,
and within Gearty Park. The preliminary project design concluded that several of
these locations were appropriate for water quality improvements, and identified
another location that was not included in the Surface Water Management Plan.
The water quality ponding identified in Gearty Park was eliminated from
consideration due to the extent of recreation programming in the park and
potential flooding issues.
Scott A venue
As discussed earlier in this report, the City of Golden Valley recently purchased
and demolished three homes in the flood plain along Scott Avenue near
Hampton Road. The storm water ponding in this location was not identified in the
Surface Water Management Plan. However, the Flood Damage Reduction Grant
funds used to acquire and demolish the flood prone homes included a stipulation
that the properties be converted to a permanent open space use, which is
accomplished with the storm water ponds.
As shown on Exhibit 2V, there is existing storm sewer within the streets adjacent
to these now vacant properties.
14
The proposed project includes realignment of this storm sewer to discharge into
a new nutrient removal pond prior to discharge into Bassett Creek.
A nutrient removal pond is designed to include a specified wet pool volume,
calculated based upon the make up of the tributary watershed that allows
sediment carried in the storm water runoff, and the nutrients attached to the
sediment, to settle in the excavated area. The proposed Scott Avenue pond will
be constructed to industry standards for nutrient removal ponds, and will remove
an estimated 52% of the total phosphorus loading in the storm water runoff. The
typical phosphorus removal efficiency goal for a nutrient removal pond is 60%.
Reaent A venue and Westbend Road
As previously discussed in this report, the City of Golden Valley owns two vacant
tax forfeit properties at the intersection of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road
where water quality improvements are proposed as part of this project. These
properties have also been identified in the City's current Comprehensive Surface
Water Management Plan as potential locations for water quality facilities. Due to
the poor structural stability of the soils in the area, and the resulting flat slopes
the soils will support, the construction of standard nutrient removal ponds is not
feasible. However, the construction of shallow water treatment features with
flatter slopes is feasible.
As shown on Exhibit 2V, a shallow "wet meadow" is proposed for the property in
the southeast corner of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road. This water
treatment facility will be a "dry" pond that will receive storm water from the south
and east of the intersection and will discharge to the west towards Minnaqua
Pond and Bassett Creek. The ponding area will hold storm water runoff for a
short period following rainfalls, and will be dry at most times. The proposed
ponding area will be vegetated with wetland grasses and wildflowers.
The southwest corner of the intersection of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road
is a wooded area that has an existing wooded flood plain wetland along
Westbend Road. The proposed improvements on this property include expansion
of the existing wetland and routing storm water runoff through the newly created
ponding area prior to discharge into Bassett Creek. This proposed plan will
preserve the trees nearest Westbend Road and along the south property line
within the existing wetland. As shown on Exhibit 2V, a number of the existing
trees in the central portion of the property will be removed for pond construction.
However, this area will be replanted with tree species that thrive in wetland
environments.
The proposed water quality improvements at the intersection of Regent Avenue
and Westbend Road cannot be constructed according to typical water quality
removal volume requirements, and therefore will not achieve the removal
efficiencies that are expected with typical nutrient removal ponds.
15
However, the water quality features at Regent Avenue and Westbend Road will
remove an estimated 29% of the phosphorus carried in the storm water runoff.
The construction of these facilities is consistent with the past practices of the City
to achieve incremental water quality improvements when possible, with an
overall goal of improving the water quality of Bassett Creek.
The vegetation in both of the ponding areas at the intersection of Regent Avenue
and Westbend Road will be managed under the City's ongoing buffer and native
vegetation contract.
Other Water Qualitv Measures
In addition to the proposed storm water ponding improvements discussed above,
storm sewer sump manholes will be installed throughout the project area. These
sump manholes allow larger debris and sediment in storm water runoff to settle
out in the sump, where it is cleaned out on a regularly scheduled basis as part of
the City's maintenance program.
The minimization of impervious surfaces such as pavement, which generate
higher volumes of storm water runoff than vegetated surfaces, is a goal of PMP
design. The existing impervious surfaces within the City owned street right-of-
ways totals 28.59 acres for the entire project area. The post construction
impervious surface area will be 27.92 acres, which includes streets and
sidewalks, for a total decrease of 0.67 acres.
Streets
The City of Golden Valley Pavement Management Program stresses the use of proper
pavement rehabilitation measures for each street. Staff has reviewed the streets within
this proposed project area and determined that reconstruction of the roadways to City
standards is the appropriate rehabilitation measure for all of the roadways within the
project area. This section of the report will discuss proposed rehabilitation measures
being recommended, as well as the structural and geometric concerns encountered
during preliminary design.
The reconstruction of Culver Road, the MSAS street within the project area, is
discussed in the Pedestrian Facilities portion of this report.
Pavement Overlavs
The Pavement Management Program approaches street rehabilitation on a
neighborhood basis in order to maximize economic benefits of adjacent work,
and to minimize the disruption to any neighborhood to the extent possible. Scott
Avenue North between Toledo Avenue and Westbend Road; and Toledo Avenue
North between Duluth Street and Minnaqua Drive were reconstructed during the
early 1990's and are adjacent to the southern portion of this project. The existing
pavements on these streets show distresses typical with streets of their age, and
the pavement lifespan could be extended with an overlay of the pavement.
16
Therefore, these streets will be included in this project for an overlay as shown
on Exhibit 2U.
An overlay of Scott and Toledo Avenues will allow the City to consolidate future
maintenance efforts such as sealcoating within the portion of the City east of
Trunk Highway 100.
The City of Golden Valley 2008-2012 Capital Improvement Plan includes funding
for the overlay of Mendelssohn Avenue between Plymouth Avenue and Medicine
Lake Road. This overlay will be included in the construction contract for the 2008
portion of the project. However, the funding for the Mendelssohn Avenue overlay
is not included in the construction costs or financing for this project.
As outlined in the City of Golden Valley Special Assessment Policy, there are no
special assessments for properties adjacent to residential streets being overlaid.
Street Widths
The Pavement Management Policy strives to maintain existing street widths
when a roadway is reconstructed. The policy outlines exceptions to this goal for
streets where high traffic volumes or unsafe traffic conditions are present that
could be resolved with additional street width. This portion of the Pavement
Management Policy has been adhered to in this project to the extent possible.
The proposed street widths for this project are 24, 26 and 28 feet wide
throughout the project area. The proposed width of each street is shown on
Exhibits 2A through 2T. The proposed street widths were determined by
selecting a proposed width that most closely fits the average of the street, while
also considering potential impacts. Therefore, at any specific point on a street,
the proposed street width may be narrower, or wider, than the existing roadway.
Regent Avenue, which parallels Noble Avenue and Trunk Highway 100, carries
up to 2000 vehicle trips per day, and operates as a local collector street as
discussed earlier in this report. In order to improve safety and accommodate the
need for on street parking near Gearty Park, a parking bay is proposed on the
west side of Regent Avenue adjacent to the park. The width of Regent Avenue in
the vicinity of the park is 28 feet, expanding to 34 feet for the parking bay as
shown on Exhibit P.
During preliminary project development staff received comments regarding traffic
speeds on Regent Avenue. In order to address these concerns a series of traffic
speed counts were performed. The average speed of traffic at each of the speed
count locations was below 30 miles per hour, but the 85th percentile speed, which
is used in the determination of speed limits, was at or slightly above the 30 mile
per hour speed limit. While these results do not indicate a significant speeding
issue on Regent Avenue, there is reason to be concerned about some cars
traveling over the speed limit.
17
In order to address this issue, there are several locations where the proposed
street width is to be narrowed to 24 feet wide to provide traffic calming. These
"chokers" provide drivers with visual incentive to slow down due to the varying
street widths, and are shown on Exhibits 2N through 2P.
Traffic Control
There is one proposed change to the existing traffic control within the project
area. The intersection of Regent Avenue and 33rd Avenue is currently a two way
stop intersection, with stop control present on Regent Avenue. However, due to
limited sight distance to the west at this intersection, drivers stopped on Regent
Avenue do not have time to adequately assess the speed of traffic approaching
from the west. Therefore, it is recommended that stop signs be installed on 33rd
Avenue in order to provide adequate sight lines on all legs of the intersection.
Subgrade Corrections
Based upon the subsurface conditions encountered within the project area, it is
recommended that subgrade correction occur beneath each street with
structurally substandard subgrade materials. Subgrade correction is performed
by removing soft, moisture-susceptible soils that are structurally unsuitable, and
backfilling with clean (minimal silt) granular material such as sand or gravel. The
subgrade correction planned for this project includes subcutting up to four feet
and replacing the excavated soils with three feet of sand and the City's standard
bituminous and gravel street section. The depth of subcuts to be constructed will
be determined for each street in the field based upon actual soil conditions
encountered.
The use of geotextile fabrics for additional subgrade stabilization is anticipated in
several locations within the project area, typically in areas where silty subgrade
soils have been identified. However, the actual need for geotextile fabrics will be
determined during construction based upon materials encountered in the field.
As previously discussed within this report, there are several areas within the
project with deep underlying swamp deposits and organic soils. Standard
subgrade excavation and backfilling with granular materials is not feasible in
these areas due to the high potential of long term street settlements. Therefore,
the use of lightweight aggregate is proposed in these areas. The lightweight
aggregate has a lower unit weight than the granular soils typically used, which
reduces the risk of settlement of the new street, curb and gutter and utilities.
18
The locations within the project where the use of lightweight aggregate is
proposed include:
. Approximately 300 feet of Regent Avenue at Westbend Road;
. Westbend Road between Regent Avenue and Perry Avenue;
. Scott Avenue between Hampton Road and Marie Lane West;
. Triton Drive between Glenden Terrace and Regent Avenue;
. Regent Avenue between Triton Drive and Lowry Terrace;
. Lowry Terrace between Scott Avenue and Regent Avenue;
. Culver Road between Scott Avenue and Regent Avenue.
The proposed subgrade correction issues on Westbend Road between Scott
Avenue and Regent Avenue will be discussed later in this section of the
feasibility report.
Concrete Curb and Gutter
The installation of concrete curb and gutter is preferred by Public Works staff
because of its engineering and maintenance advantages. However, the
Pavement Management Policy recognizes that some people do not like the look
of concrete curbs. Therefore, the policy includes a survey process to allow
residents to "opt out" of concrete curb and gutter, with some exceptions, if a
significant majority of property owners wish to have it removed from a project.
As outlined in the Pavement Management Policy, a project survey questioning
property owners on their preferences regarding concrete curb and gutter was
mailed to each resident. The survey asked homeowners to check one of the
following options.
1) I prefer that the streets in my neighborhood be reconstructed with
concrete curb and gutter.
2) I prefer that the streets in my neighborhood be reconstructed without
concrete curb and gutter.
A total of 554 surveys were mailed to homes within the project area. A total of
306 of these surveys were returned (55.2%) prior to the second neighborhood
meetings. The survey results for individual streets are shown on Appendix B:
Street Survey Results. The overall survey results for the entire project area are
as follows.
1) A total of 258 responses, or 46.6 percent of the total, prefer that the
streets be reconstructed with concrete curb and gutter.
2) A total of 41 responses, or 7.4 percent of the total, prefer that the streets
be reconstructed without concrete curb and gutter.
3) A total of 7 surveys, or 1.3 percent of the total, were returned with neither
of the two options selected.
19
Based upon the criteria for concrete curb and gutter in the Pavement
Management Policy and the results of the project survey, staff recommends that
concrete curb and gutter be installed on all streets in the project area.
Alternate Curb Types
The standard type of concrete curb and gutter on Golden Valley streets includes
a 6 inch barrier curb and an 18 inch gutter, and is therefore type B618 curb and
gutter. Several residents in the Windsor Way, Markay Ridge, Perry Avenue and
Orchard Avenue portion of the project expressed interest in an alternate style of
curb in their portion of the project. The 0412 type curb is the surmountable curb
that was last installed as part of the 2007 PMP on Spruce Trail just east of Noble
Avenue. A total of five property owners, out of a total of 52 properties, expressed
an interest in the surmountable curb and gutter.
Because the issue of surmountable curb and gutter is discussed with nearly
every PMP project, processes for determining when it should be considered are
needed. This issue was discussed at the December 14, 2007 Council/Manager
Meeting, along with several other PMP related issues. At this meeting the City
Council directed staff to establish a 75% acceptance rate of surmountable curb
from the property owners included in any area considering the 0412 curb. In
addition, because streets with surmountable curb experience significantly more
turf damage due to snow removal, which is repaired by the City, homeowners
who opt to have surmountable curb would also need to agree to assume all
responsibility for lawn repair due to snow plowing.
Based upon the Council direction at the December 14th meeting, and the total of
five property owners expressing an interest in surmountable curb, varying from
the City standard B618 curb and gutter in this project area is not proposed.
Traffic Issues and Intersection Layouts
As part of the preliminary design work for all PMP projects, City staff and the
City's consulting traffic engineer review street intersections in the project area for
alignment, safety and operational issues that should be addressed during street
rehabilitation. If potential modifications to intersection alignments are identified,
new concepts to address the issues are presented to residents at the open
house meetings. If needed, separate meetings with property owners in the
vicinity of an intersection are held.
There were four intersections identified during this review process that alternative
alignments were prepared for and meetings were held with adjacent
homeowners. The following is a summary of the intersection locations and the
proposed layout of each.
20
Triton Drive and Scott Avenue: The existing conditions at Triton Drive
and Scott Avenue include large pavement surfaces and a non-
perpendicular intersection that presents concerns for safety. Alternatives
for maintaining Scott Avenue and Triton Drive as through streets were
prepared. Based upon input from the adjacent property owners, the
proposed design shown on Exhibit 2Q includes maintaining Scott Avenue
as the through street. In addition, the radii of the intersection were reduced
to provide a perpendicular intersection and to minimize storm water runoff
from the pavement surface.
Quail Avenue and Dona Lane: The existing conditions at Quail Avenue
and Dona Lane include a large intersection with a sweeping curve on the
west side of Quail Avenue providing through traffic on Quail Avenue. The
non-perpendicular intersection also contributes to unclear assignment of
right of way and encourages free flowing and higher speed traffic on both
streets. Based upon alternate layouts and discussion with the affected
property owners, the project includes intersecting Quail Avenue as a "tee"
with Dona Lane, as shown on Exhibit 2E. The proposed alignment also
results in Dona Lane being the through traffic movement and minimizes
impervious pavement surface.
Orchard Avenue and Ordway: The existing intersection of Orchard
Avenue and Ordway includes a triangular island in the intersection. The
existing island presents some traffic flow issues that could be marginally
improved by creating a single, perpendicular intersection at this location.
Based upon several potential intersection modifications and discussions
with adjacent property owners, the proposed project includes maintaining
the existing island, reducing the impervious pavement area and making
the island slightly smaller as shown on Exhibit 2L.
Westbend Road and Ordway: The existing conditions at the intersection
of Westbend Road and Ordway include a large sweeping curve in the
northwest corner resulting in traffic safety concerns related to unclear
traffic right of way. Based upon alternative alignments and discussions
with affected property owners the proposed project includes maintaining
Ordway as the through traffic movement and creating a perpendicular
intersection with reduced impervious surface. The proposed layout is
shown on Exhibit 2L.
There are numerous intersections within the project area that have wide
pavement areas that create poor sight lines and encourage high traffic speeds.
These intersections are generally acceptable from an overall perspective, but
needed minor modifications to improve safety and reduce impervious pavement
surfaces. These improvements included reducing intersection radii and
formalizing the existing perpendicular intersections.
21
The extent of these modifications was not significant enough to warrant
additional neighborhood participation.
Reqent A venue and Westbend Road
The intersection of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road is within the flood plain
of Bassett Creek and must be closed frequently due to flooding. This road
closure, and its impacts on traffic patterns and emergency response, results in a
need to raise the elevation of the intersection as much as possible as part of this
project.
The preliminary design for this project also identified several other issues at the
intersection of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road that impact the roadway
design. Among these issues is the need to replace the watermain and the
presence of approximately 30 feet of highly compressible organic soils beneath
Westbend Road west of Regent Avenue.
As previously discussed, lightweight fill is typically used for subgrade correction
where highly compressible soils are encountered. However, the cost of installing
lightweight fill on Westbend Road west of Regent Avenue is approximately
$340,000, for the benefit of maintaining approximately 150 vehicle trips per day.
Based upon these issues, alternative designs were investigated to minimize the
costs of reconstructing this block of West bend Road.
The alternative designs investigated for the intersection of Regent Avenue and
Westbend Road included:
. Closing Westbend Road west of Regent Avenue;
. Relocating Westbend Road to the south in the City owned property,
. Minimizing the subgrade correction on Westbend Road.
One of the primary factors influencing the design of the intersection of Westbend
Road and Regent Avenue is traffic patterns, including access to Duluth Street for
residents west of Regent Avenue. At a neighborhood meeting held to discuss the
potential intersection changes, residents from the neighborhood west of Regent
Avenue stated that the route along Scott Avenue, Westbend Road and Regent
Avenue is frequently used to safely access Duluth Street. Staff and the City's
consulting traffic engineer have confirmed these access issues through field
observations.
In addition to the existing Duluth Street access issues, a review of potential future
upgrades to the intersection of Duluth Street and Toledo Avenue was
undertaken. Based upon current design standards and Hennepin County access
control guidelines, it is likely that turns from Toledo Avenue onto Duluth Street
will be limited to right-in/right-out in the future. This possibility further reinforces
the need to maintain access to Duluth Street from Westbend Road and Regent
Avenue.
22
The cost of a potential relocation of Westbend Road to the south was also
investigated. Although the soil conditions on the southern portion of the City
owned property are better, there is still approximately 14 feet of highly
compressible organic soils present in this location. This reduced depth of poor
soils would allow the organic soils to be excavated and replaced, with the
potential savings estimated to be approximately $20,000.
Based upon the above factors, the reconstruction of Westbend Road west of
Regent Avenue in its current location with minimal subgrade correction and no
concrete curb and gutter appears to be the best overall design. In addition, in
order to minimize the potential for street settlements, the width of Westbend
Road will be decreased from its existing 26 foot width to 24 feet. This alternative
will require pavement overlays or replacement, and possible subgrade correction
work, in the future as settlement of the roadway occurs. As a result, staff
recommends that annual budgets and the Capital Improvement Plan be adjusted
to include monitoring of Westbend Road and overlays of the existing pavement
as needed.
Pedestrian Facilities
The City of Golden Valley Sidewalk and Trail Plan identifies the need for new
sidewalks and trails within the proposed project area. The facilities identified in
the Plan include:
. A concrete sidewalk on one side of Culver Road between Noble Avenue
and Lilac Drive;
. A concrete sidewalk on one side of Regent Avenue between Duluth Street
and the north City limits.
. A Three Rivers Park District's future regional trail on Westbend Road
between Minnaqua Pond and Regent Avenue;
. And completion of the future regional trail along Regent Avenue from
Westbend Road to Duluth Street (coincides with sidewalk).
The existing pedestrian facilities adjacent to the project area and the proposed
pedestrian facilities are shown on Exhibit 4: Existing and Proposed Trail System.
The pedestrian facilities shown on the City of Golden Valley Sidewalk and Trail
Plan were presented to residents in the project at the first open houses held in
the spring of 2007. The response to these proposed sidewalks resulted in
significant public comment and discussion.
23
A summary of the discussions regarding sidewalk on Culver Road and Regent
Avenue is as follows.
Culver Road: As discussed above, the Trail and Sidewalk Plan identifies
the construction of a sidewalk on one side of Culver Road connecting the
existing sidewalks on Noble Avenue to Lilac Drive. Although the Trunk
Highway 100 pedestrian bridge was not planned at the time the plan was
developed, it is a significant pedestrian feature to be connected to. The
preliminary project design included the placement of this sidewalk on the
south side of Culver Road in order to minimize the total project impacts.
A neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed sidewalk on Culver
Road was held on July 18,2007. This meeting was held to provide
residents with background information on sidewalk and trail planning in
Golden Valley, and to discuss the specific proposal for Culver Road.
Residents were also able to ask questions and make comments regarding
the proposed project. Among the comments by the property owners was a
request to have the City's Sidewalk Committee re-evaluate the need for a
sidewalk on Culver Road.
Following the neighborhood meeting, the City Council called a meeting of
the City's Sidewalk Committee to review the need for sidewalks on Culver
Road and Regent Avenue. The Sidewalk Committee, with members from
the Planning Commission, Parks and Open Space Commission, and the
Environmental Commission, was formed by the Council to evaluate and
make recommendations regarding the City's pedestrian connections and
facilities.
The Sidewalk Committee met on August 2,2007 to consider the sidewalks
within the 2008-2009 Pavement Management Program. After
presentations by staff and public comment, the Sidewalk Committee made
a recommendation to the City Council to develop alternative sidewalk or
trail options to make an east/west connection through the project area,
and if no viable alternatives were available, to eliminate the Culver Road
sidewalk from the Pavement Management project.
The City Council met in a special City Council/Manager work session on
August 21, 2007 to consider the Sidewalk Committee recommendation.
After discussion regarding alternative routes, the City Council directed
staff to eliminate the Culver Road sidewalk from the project, and to
construct Culver Road as a 28 foot wide roadway with no parking
restrictions.
24
As part of the August 21,2007 City Council discussion, the Council also
directed staff to vary from the City of Golden Valley Special Assessment
Policy for Culver Road due to the deletion of the sidewalk and varying
from the MSA parking standards. The Special Assessment Policy includes
a decreased special assessment rate for residential properties on MSAS
routes, with each home subject to an assessment that is 25% of the local
street residential rate. The City Council directed that Culver Road
properties be subject to the special assessment rate for local streets,
which has been set at $4400 per unit for this project.
ReQent Avenue: As discussed earlier in this report, the Golden Valley
Sidewalk and Trail Plan identifies a sidewalk on one side of Regent
Avenue between Duluth Street and the north City Limits. This identified
sidewalk connects with a walk in the City of Crystal on the north, and with
the existing sidewalks and trail system on Duluth Street to the south. In
addition, the plan also identifies a Three Rivers Park District regional trail
along the portion of Regent Avenue between Duluth Street and Westbend
Road.
Based upon the extent of discussion generated regarding the Regent
Avenue sidewalk following the first neighborhood open houses, a
neighborhood meeting was held on July 11,2007. This meeting included a
presentation by staff regarding the background of pedestrian planning in
Golden Valley, discussion regarding the specific sidewalk proposed for
Regent Avenue and an opportunity for residents to ask questions and
make comments.
As with Culver Road, the discussion at this neighborhood meeting
included requests to have the City Council re-evaluate the need for
sidewalk on Regent Avenue. The Sidewalk Committee discussed the
Regent Avenue sidewalk at its August 2,2007 meeting. Following
discussion, the Sidewalk Committee forwarded a recommendation to the
City Council that included approval of the Regent Avenue sidewalk, with
efforts to minimize the width and the impacts to the neighborhood
incorporated into the design, and to make the connection to the Trunk
Highway 100 pedestrian bridge through the right-of-way for the non-
existent portion of Dawnview Terrace west of Regent Avenue. The
sidewalk through Dawnview Terrace would connect to the existing trails in
the Briarwood Nature Area discussed earlier in this report and shown on
Exhibit 4.
The City Council directed staff to implement the Sidewalk Committee
recommendations at its August 21,2007 work session. Based upon this
direction, the sidewalk on Regent Avenue is included in this project.
25
The Regent Avenue sidewalk is proposed on the west side of Regent
Avenue for its entire length. The proposed walk will be five feet wide with a
two foot wide shoulder separating the walk from the curb and gutter. This
shoulder will have a surface treatment applied to provide visual separation
between the walkway and the roadway. The proposed surface treatment
for the boulevard area is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1
In order to comply with the accessibility requirements of the American with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and to further minimize impacts due to sidewalk
construction, the project design will incorporate three foot wide driveway
aprons and a four foot wide sidewalk at the top of each driveway apron.
The specific details of the proposed Regent Avenue sidewalk are shown
on Exhibit 5: Regent A venue Sidewalk Details and on Exhibits 2N through
2P.
As previously discussed in the Utility portion of this report, it is
recommended that the proposed trail connection between Minnaqua Drive
and Regent Avenue be constructed over the watermain in the City owned
tax forfeit property at the southwest corner of Regent Avenue and
Westbend Road.
26
All comments received by the City on comment cards, e-mail and
correspondence relating to the installation of sidewalks on Culver Road and
Regent Avenue, as well as design newsletters, neighborhood meeting minutes
and other related information is included in Appendix 0: Regent Avenue and
Culver Road Comments. Additional comments are also included in Appendix A:
Summary of Resident Comments, of this report.
Street Lightinq
There are existing decorative street lights in several locations throughout the
project area. The fiberglass light poles used for the decorative street lighting are
in poor condition due to their age. Therefore, they will be replaced by Xcel
Energy Outdoor Lighting as part of this project. The estimated cost for
replacement of these street lights in the 2008 portion of the project is $46,500.
The estimated 2009 street light replacement cost is $173,900, which may be
subject to change based upon the year the lights are replaced. City staff and Xcel
Energy Outdoor Lighting are currently working on this issue.
Tree and Landscape Impacts
The proposed project outlined in this feasibility report includes minimizing
impacts to landscaping, trees and shrubs as a major design consideration. As a
result, the impacts have been minimized to the extent possible.
The Environmental Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project to determine
the extent of the construction impacts and potential indirect impacts to trees. This
review is included as Appendix C of this report. The Environmental Coordinator's
review also outlines steps to be taken during construction to limit unanticipated
impacts. The tree and shrub replacement program is also discussed in this
review.
As noted in Appendix C, the Environmental Coordinator has estimated that there
are approximately 21 trees and 95 shrubs that are likely to be removed for street,
sidewalk and utility construction. These anticipated removals are for the entire
eight miles of streets contained in this two year project. The City's policy for
unavoidable tree and shrub loss during PMP projects is also discussed in
Appendix C.
In addition to the tree removal for the street reconstruction, there will be tree
removal required for the construction of the water quality and storm water
ponding as discussed earlier in this report. The majority of the trees being
removed for storm water ponding construction are not considered to be
significant trees according to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. However,
there are several large cottonwood trees that are being removed within the
wooded flood plain wetland in the southwest corner of Regent Avenue and
Westbend Road.
The Environmental Coordinator also notes that the Scott Avenue and
Regent/Westbend pond plans call for reforestation as part of the project.
27
The extent of the potential tree impacts due to the reconstruction of sanitary
sewer services cannot be quantified at this time. Because maintenance of
sanitary sewer services is the responsibility of the individual homeowners, the
removal and replacement of trees and shrubs due to sewer service repairs will
also be the homeowners' responsibility. Any such tree removals will be included
in the assessable costs to perform the sanitary sewer repair, but replacements as
part of the project will not be included in the private work. The potential impacts
to trees, shrubs and landscaping is one of the primary reasons that lining of
sanitary sewer services is the preferred method of rehabilitation.
Drivewav Reconstruction Program
As with past Pavement Management projects, homeowners within the project
area whose driveways are impacted by street reconstruction will be given the
opportunity to have their driveway completely replaced as part of the project
using the contract unit prices included in the contract. As part of this program,
residents have the option of having the driveway reconstruction costs assessed
against their property for a period of 10 years.
It should be noted that the City may deny homeowner participation in the
driveway replacement program in situations where the reconstruction is
excessively complicated or additional liability is incurred by the City during the
reconstruction of the driveway. This type of construction includes pavement
removal or installation against the base of retaining walls, foundation or
basement walls or very flat or steep grades.
Estimated Costs and Proiect Financina
Estimated Proiect Costs
The estimated costs for the improvements outlined in this report are separated by the
type of work, funding sources, and the proposed year of construction. These categories
include utility work, storm drainage improvements and street reconstruction costs. The
estimated project costs include construction costs and an estimated 25 percent of the
construction costs as indirect costs. These indirect costs typically include project design,
surveying, construction administration and legal costs.
Discussion on the financing and funding sources for the proposed improvements is
included in the next section of this report.
28
Sewer and Water Costs
The estimated sewer and water costs include all water main replacement,
sanitary sewer repairs and maintenance as outlined within this report. As
discussed earlier in this report, the estimated utility costs are calculated to the
budgeted amount in order to allow flexibility to perform additional sanitary sewer
main repairs if favorable bids are received.
2008 Costs 2009 Costs
Estimated Construction Costs =
Estimated 25% Indirect Costs =
Estimated Sewer and Water Total =
$ 880,000 $ 880,000
$ 220.000 $ 220.000
$1,100,000 $1,100,000
Storm Drainaae Costs
The estimated storm drainage costs include all storm sewer installation, water
quality measures, and erosion control. In addition, the 2009 costs include the
construction of the water quality ponds discussed within this report.
2008 Costs 2009 Costs
Estimated Construction Costs =
Estimated 25% Indirect Costs =
Estimated Storm Drainage Total =
$720,000
$180,000
$900,000
$1,078,000
$ 269.500
$1,347,500
Street Reconstruction Costs
The estimated street reconstruction costs include all subgrade correction,
pavement, curb and gutter, vegetation restoration and landscaping costs. These
costs also include $46,500 in 2008; and $174,000 in 2009 for the removal and
replacement of decorative street lights within the project area. In addition, the
street reconstruction costs include quantities for an estimated 20% participation
in the private driveway reconstruction program.
2008 Costs 2009 Costs
Estimated Construction Costs =
Estimated 25% Indirect Costs =
Estimated Street Sub-Total =
Xcel Street Lighting Replacement =
Estimated Street Reconstruction Total =
$4,363,000 $5,220,300
$1.000.500 $1,305.700
$5,453,500 $6,526,000
$ 46.500 $ 174.000
$5,500,000 $6,700,000
29
Total Proiect Costs
2008 Costs 2009 Costs
Estimated Sewer and Water Costs =
Estimated Storm Drainage Costs =
Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs =
Estimated Total Project Cost =
$1,100,000 $1,100,000
$ 900,000 $1,347,500
$5,500,000 $6}00.000
$7,500,000 $9,147,500
Proposed Proiect Financina
The proposed financing of this project is a combination of special assessments to
properties abutting the streets being improved, street improvement funds, the Sewer
and Water Reserve Fund and the Storm Water Improvement Fund. The following is a
brief description of each of these funding sources and a summary of the estimated
amount to be funded from each source.
The funding for this project does not include Municipal State Aid funds from the
Minnesota Department of Transportation for Culver Road, a designated MSAS street.
Special Assessments
The proposed special assessments for the 2008-2009 Pavement Management
Project are consistent with the City of Golden Valley Special Assessment Policy
and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. As outlined in the Special Assessment
Policy, residential properties are assessed on a per-unit basis for each single
family or duplex unit. Oversized lots that may potentially be subdivided into
additional conforming lots are assessed one unit assessment for each potential
lot. However, only one unit assessment is levied with the project; with the other
assessments being deferred until the property is subdivided.
Corner residential lots are assessed one-half unit for each of the lot's frontage
being improved, with no more that one full unit assessed, unless the lot could be
subdivided.
The residential special assessment rate for 2008-2009 has been established by
the City Council in its annual Fee Ordinance. The residential assessment rate
that has been established for both years of this project is $4,400 per unit. As
discussed earlier in this report, the special assessment rate for properties on
Culver Road is to be the local street rate.
The City of Golden Valley Special Assessment Policy includes assessment of tax
exempt properties on a front foot basis for 100% of the frontage being improved.
Therefore, all of the City of Golden Valley properties within the project area are to
be assessed on this basis. The City owned properties within the project area
include Gearty Park, the Briarwood Nature Area, and several vacant lots.
30
The total special assessment to City owned property is $232,098.25 as outlined
in Exhibit 6: Preliminary Special Assessment Roll.
As shown on Exhibit 6: Preliminary Special Assessment Ro". An estimated
$2,729,117 of the street reconstruction costs will be financed through special
assessments. The total special assessment includes $1,339,635 from the 2008
portion of the project and $1,389,482 in 2009.
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund
The Sewer and Water Reserve Fund will be the funding source for all sanitary
sewer and water main work discussed within this report. The estimated amount
to be funded from this source is $1,100,000 in 2008 and $1,100,000 in 2009, for
a total of $2,200,000. As discussed earlier in this report, the estimated utility
costs are at the budgeted amount in order to allow the flexibility to address inflow
and infiltration into the sanitary sewer system to the maximum extent possible.
The Sewer and Water Reserve Fund is financed from sanitary sewer and water
utility fees.
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund
All storm drainage improvements, including lateral storm sewer extensions, drain
tile, water quality ponds, erosion control and storm water BMPs are funded from
the Storm Sewer Improvement Fund. It is estimated that $900,000 of the 2008
project costs; and $1,347,500 of the 2009 project costs, will be funded from this
source. The Storm Sewer Improvement Fund is financed from storm water utility
fees paid by all properties in the City.
Street Improvement Funds
All street rehabilitation costs not funded by special assessments will be funded
using street improvement tax levies. These levies are used to repay bonds sold
to finance the project. An estimated $4,160,365 of the 2008 project costs; and
$5,310,518 of the 2009 project costs, will be funded from this source.
Funding for the overlay of existing asphalt pavement on Mendelssohn Avenue,
Toledo Avenue and Scott Avenue as discussed in this report is accounted for in
the 2008-2012 Capital Improvement Plan.
Financinq Summary
The following is a summary of the amounts to be funded from each of the
sources discussed above.
Special Assessments =
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund =
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund =
Street Improvement Funds =
Estimated Total Project Cost =
2008
$1,339,635
$1,100,000
$ 900,000
$4.160.365
$7,500,000
2009
$1,389,482
$1,100,000
$1,347,500
$5.310.518
$9,147,500
31
Summary and Recommendations
This feasibility report for the proposed 2008-2009 Pavement Management Project has
been prepared in accordance with the Golden Valley City Council's authorization on
October 3,2006. The proposed improvements are part of a city-wide Pavement
Management Program adopted by the City in order to provide a high-quality street
system in a long-term, cost-effective manner. The Pavement Management Program
also includes the replacement and rehabilitation of the existing sanitary sewer,
watermain and storm sewer systems as needed with each project.
This report discusses the proposed improvements to streets illustrated on Exhibit 1:
Project Location Map. The improvements outlined in this report are to be constructed
over a two year period under two construction contracts. The streets included in the
2008 and 2009 construction contracts are shown on Exhibit 3: Proposed Construction
Phasing. A summary of the proposed improvements is as follows:
Utilitv Improvements
The sanitary sewer work proposed with this project will include limited
reconstruction of the existing sanitary sewer on Lowry Terrace. All other
anticipated rehabilitation is limited to lining of existing sanitary sewer mains to
repair existing defects to the sewers; and an optional sanitary sewer service
repair program that residents may choose to participate in to rehabilitate their
sanitary sewer services. The costs of the private sanitary sewer service repairs
will be specially assessed to the benefiting property.
Watermain work proposed with this project includes removal and replacement of
the existing facilities on portions of Scott Avenue North, Westbend Road, Marie
Lane West and Regent Avenue as discussed in this report. Other watermain
work will be limited to localized repair of gate valves and fittings, relocation of fire
hydrants and painting of all hydrants in the project area.
The estimated cost for the proposed sanitary sewer and watermain work
discussed within this report is $1,100,000 in 2008, and $1,100,000 in 2009 for a
total of $2,200,000 for the overall project. The estimated totals include
construction and indirect costs. This portion of the project will be funded from the
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund and special assessments for sanitary sewer
rehabilitation.
32
Storm Drainaae Improvements
The storm drainage improvements proposed as part of this project consist of
extension of lateral storm sewers to provide adequate drainage on all streets
within the project area, installation of a sump drainage system behind the curbs
throughout the project area, the construction of storm water ponds near Regent
Avenue and Westbend Road and on Scott Avenue, and installation of sump
manholes and erosion control items as discussed in this report.
The estimated cost of these improvements is $900,000 in 2008; $1,347,500 in
2009 for a total $2,247,500 for the overall project. All storm water related costs
within this project are to be funded from the Storm Sewer Improvement Fund.
Street Improvements
The street improvements proposed as part of this project include rehabilitation of
approximately 7.5 miles of local streets and 0.5 miles of Municipal State Aid
streets. Culver Road between Noble Avenue and Lilac Drive is the designated
MSAS roadway. However, as discussed within this report, properties on Culver
Road will be assessed at the local street assessment rate of $4,400 per unit.
The proposed street reconstruction within the project area has been designed
according to City standards including the installation of concrete curb and gutter
and asphalt pavement. The proposed street widths have been minimized to the
extent possible to avoid and minimize impacts to trees and landscaping.
The improvements to all streets within this project are shown on Exhibits 2A
through 2V: Proposed Project Layouts. The recommended improvements include
the installation of concrete curb and gutter on all streets being reconstructed,
except Westbend Road between Regent and Scott Avenues, where settlement of
the roadway is anticipated.
The estimated costs for street reconstruction and overlays as discussed in this
report is estimated to be $5,500,000 in 2008; and $6,700,000 in 2009; for an
estimated overall project cost of $12,200,000.
Recommendations
Public Works staff has determined that the improvements outlined in this report are
feasible from an engineering perspective. These improvements are consistent with the
City of Golden Valley Pavement Management Program and will benefit the community
and those properties abutting the proposed improvements. The cost-effectiveness of the
proposed improvements should be determined by the City Council.
Staff recommends approval of City Improvement Projects No. 08-1,2008 Pavement
Management; and No. 09-01, 2009 Pavement Management as discussed within this
report. Staff further recommends that the City Council authorize advertising for bids to
construct the projects.
33
EXHIBITS AND APPENDICES
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1
Exhibits 2A - 2V
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6
Project Location Map
Proposed Project Layouts
Proposed Construction Phasing
Pedestrian System Map
Regent Avenue Sidewalk Details
Preliminary Special Assessment Roll
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Summary of Resident Comments
Street Survey Results
Environmental Coordinator Review
Regent Avenue and Culver Road Sidewalk Comments
iii
Z
II:
,Q
U.
:'i
:;
t
--l
Location Map 2008-2009
Pavement Management Program (PMP)
Exhibit 1
BASSETT CREEK DRIVE
<i;,EX~IB\ITr~ ~ '"
.-- W I i \ ~
~ I I I ,~,
....... I \ I /' /)
I I / ,
'>/~o'
f..:}"-" _ _ _
SEE EXHIBIT 2N
pu~
t=~J
~
lD
"
11
12
r-------ri-~ II!<)
~ Lm-----1-t- : ~
is, I
~ ~ ) I
SEE EXHIBIT 2N
/
5
4
:I
'"
6"
o
/' pMO
O. tr i \
.1 0 I' I
- ~ -- I i
I
#780
#7,
r---,
I '
r.\8D3P-'\
-t;;;y" . I I
#800 I I
ILuJt
, ,
u~
g
w
m
w
w
VI
Kf"_~ 6" 30"
~ ~ 10u('Y-
~95
T~7.
7
4
6
5
8
:I
\_-
- ~
@
DAWN
ACRES
SECOND ADDN.
f::,I
3-
-
BASSETT CREEK DRIVE
, ~
: ~
'~2"
0"
'\'"
~''''''
, ,
,,' ,..'
'/'/'(!J/ .10'
, .
. .
5
4
:I
,
,
I
I
#780
r--,
I '
r.\80:1f.~
----cr. . I I
'" .
/' ~
0" .r I i
., <:} \, I
- ~ - - I i
#800 l..~
\L__~_
6"
o
~
o
m
oct:
w
W
VI
7
4
6
5
8
\
--10
9
@
DAWN
ACRES
SECOND ADDN.
-+3
Nt'
9
2
WI
~I
<(,
W: I
....I,
g I .
I
,
L
GIlAPHlC SCALE
50 ~50 100 200
k........ I I
( IN FEET )
P7~ " 1 p700
I \ ,--j
. t""-...L, : I
/ \ r,E ~---< ~---j
tJ ~=-4 ~ - ij-
'" LEGEND '"
->
-> >-----
EXISTING CURB '" GUTTER
PROPOSED CURB III GUTTER
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WA 1ERl.IAIN
PROPOSED WAlIRMAlN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
2
-I 1-
->> >>-
->> >>-
:I
EXISTING PAVEMENT
26'
.
DEHOlIS PROPOSED STREn WDlH
DEHOlIS ENVIRONMENTAL MANHOLE
::=:==---
EXHIBIT 2A
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
CULVER ROAD
SEE EXHIBIT 2Q
SEE EXHIBIT 2P
\
,
! I ~
~
] ,
v
~ I 10
~] ! ~
~
v
]"
II
I II
i fi
I \~.
I , '" in
I '"
I 11-,.,,~.,-,
I rh~
I ___~
I I : :
I r ' "
I I
I 'I
VII ;:5J8.5
, f" I ,.." ~ ,
\ 11 I
I I'll
I II
I 11
, 11
I v 11
I III
I 1\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
@Ii WOOD LA WN It PARK
---------------4 ------------
I
.::i
_ 0
- 0
o
~
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------~
I
,,! i
I I
j L---
...
-------------
--------
------
---------
---------
PA'RK l1f
, I
I I
L ,
WOODLAWN
SECOND
ADDITlON
6
@
7
~
8
9
pJ80
~o
~
...-----,
\ \
\ \
I
--,
-,----
I
,S?; I L..l..L___
I u.'. r-_
SEE EXHIBIT 2F
~
r-----l'-~ L ! ! 0
\ s~-E1HIBI! ~
LAJ/! I: ptH7
C:::,tf! : I I 1
! I VII
L-j ~ I I
I D' ~--------------
<>, V I
------W-i ~ I' :
------4-~ I
,
"saJ7
2
pQ27
3
B
A
O.
1057
~---
SEE EXHIBIT 2C
~ ~
~
//" , , \
~
", \
~U\
----y ~ \~
~ "'
- - - - - ~
~
.. \
SEE EXHIBIT 21 CULVER ROAD
-~~~j=d I=k i i
~ ~ I , ~ ~
I I
~ ~ I I
~ <( I I ~ <(
I I ~ I ~
...J I I ~ ...J
0 I I 0 ~
I I ~
0 , I 0
0 I I 0
I I
~ ! ! I I ~
~
0-
"
II.
II
II
II
II
II
ill
II
II
II
II
~ ::? III
~ ,II
, .11
II
--------=========j ::
II
III
II
II
II
~
~
i
~
"
:>
:t
"
:;
c
:>
:>
~
"
"
~
ri
"
-
c
i:
<
"
::i>
;:
"
Ii
D
i:
<
u
c
:>
:>
"
/
>-
:;;
"
"
:;.
~
~
"
/
:>
:>
:>
:>
/
>
"
:;
,
/
/L
-, (lJ
L -
/0
" ::l
f) .~
w
::>
z
~
<(,
Cl
a::
<(
I
()
a::
o
~
9> ..,
~ -
::?
~ ~
~
~ ~
_______________________.J
-, I ,..--------------
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
in
'"
~ N
~ -
=~
~
I
i
I
I
tL.---1
J
~
~
ptlJ7
2
;<1927
3
;<1915
4
;<1907
5
P90'
6
p827
7
;<1815
;<1801
;<I7~7
;<1715
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i~...
,
,
PARK
@ I WOODLAWN
~
pQI5
4
pool
5
I
i~.
j
..j
w
::>
z
w
>
<(
~ I'
(Ill
01
Zl
I
I
GRlO.PHIC SCALE
~ ~O 100 200
~- I I
(IN FEET)
~ LEGEND ~
->
->
EXISllNG CURB '" GUTIER
PROPOSED CURB '" GUTIER
EXlSllNG SANITARY ~
PROPOSED SANITARY ~
EXlSllNG WA TERMAIN
PROPOSED WA TERIAAIN
EXISllNG STORIA ~
PROPOSED STORM ~
>-
>-
-I
1-
>>-
>>-
->>
->>
EXISllNG PA-.a.!ENT
26'
.
DENOlES PROPOSED SlREET W1DlH
OENOlES ENVIRONMENTAL IAANHOLE
EXHIBIT 2B
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
:;;
~
C
::J
::J
"
"-
"
~
)
"
c
E
<
"
:j,
~
"
Ii
c
E
<
u
C
::J
::J
"
.--
>.
:;
:r.
"
JJ
:;.
"'
:;
x
JJ
.--
::J
::J
::J
::J
.--
>
"
~
:-
,
.-- ~
" "
~-
.-- ~
Ii .~
l
~
'" ~
"
@
::E
o
o
o
r
)>
~
~ l
~
'" ~
"
SEE EXHIBIT 2B
CHEROKEE PLACE
~
SEE EXHIBIT 21
~
" 0\
... o.
l. ~ tf-\
~
8)
" (;
...
...
P9J6
P!HO
11
p.9f.2
8
p.9.2-i
9
10
o
WOODLAWN
PARK
------------ ----------------
.-_____---------r--- __________-t--------~--
I I I
i V/OO\)LAVII'I i P ARK I
i :0 I
: 5 I :
I I 4 !
I
: 3
,-------------- ,..
I '
I I
I I
I '
I '
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 2 I
, !
SEE EXHIBIT 21
DRAKE ROAD
SEE EXHIBIT 2M
~----- --
-,
-j
N~
e
r--T--
I I
L__l__
n~
----i
-__d
--------!~
-------J
....----
.-
"
~ =1
--J
~
~
""
ADDIT10N
CD
ADDIT10N
4
3
pg.20
pg,o
P850
,
I
/
I
I
I
H'
;.,
N
;.,
N
w
=>
Z
~
<(
~
I
p8.2f
~f
P9ft
pgo,
~
~
I
b
SEE EXHIBIT 2M
DAWNVlEW TERRACE
SEE EXHIBIT 2Q
"
t,
Z
N
I-
iIi
J:
x
l.LJ
l.LJ
l.LJ
Vl
,
I
8 III 9
I
I
I
II! SECOND
I
0i
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
<(
....J
:J
P8.2O
.1"'7.90 3
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 J 25 50 100 200
~_ ~ I I
(IN Fro)
"
"
",
"
"
",
""':"'" CD
ROSE~A"">"" HEIGHTS
....... '....
...'............:'............
....... ......
_____________________________~:~:.~..........J
~ LEGEND ~
->
->
>-
>-
EXISllNG CURB '" GUTlER
PROPOSED CURB '" GUTlER
EXISllNG SANITARY ~
PROPOSED SANITARY ~
EXISllNG WA TERMAIN
PROPOSED WA TERMAIN
EXISllNG STORM Se:v.ER
PROPOSED STORM ~
.PBO'
4
-I
->>
->>
1-
>>-
>>-
/'18ft
EXISllNG P A '<alENT
26'
.
OENOlES PROPOSED STREET WlOTH
OENOlES ENVIRONMENTAL MANHOLE
EXHIBIT 2C
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
SEE EXHIBIT 2C
=
~.:.S.
In~
nON
:
I ~ ~
~ ..
~
~
12
o DAWN
2
JH.9JO
p920
p910
.-,
i I
_I- : I 18lj :
ii' I -1____(XU." t
-GP-~
o
((
~w--o
L___J .#925
I I
, I
~--~
~'51 :
L__...1
pgo5
5
J
4
p77/J
1
<D DAWN
0:;:::1-::_-
ACRES
Q)
DAWN
5
p900
-4, -
1.. --- I I
- \ \ / /
\ \...-......1 /
\ I
. f
p901 I
I
6
@ DAWN
DAWNVlEW TERRACE
^
SEE EXHIBIT 20
I
SEE EXHIBIT 2E
O.
@II WOOD LA WN
PARK
1057
ACRES
@ DAWN
ACRES
2
'!{
\
4
~
JI5tW
r--'
, I
1 I
6" I 1
..
;;:
I'
11
e
#fOJ5
"
/---
SEE EXHIBIT 20
DAWNVlEW TERRACE
ACRES
6
8
l'
9
10
p800
,-1700
'---~ ,D, .
I, .I .I
.ttN75tJ I I 36- , ,
36" ! : 24 0 / /~A.~"
~- I. L_~_
-~-t- r--/ I .
. ,.,--...-..
_0
p750
r--,
I I
I I
, I
I I
24- ,l!_ _
'--~l
p8.JtJ
I
I
I I
2" 1-__ j'
___~~ ~8"
~'T'-
~
..
...
:>
.~ . 48"
u~0--
~--1
,--1
.#821
0~~ 61 ~
I
\!::1:-.-
I
I
,
, ,
L..__J
P801
pasl
~ r---~
, L____<*
0'
0::'
~+I
0::
o SEE EXHIBIT 2J
10
7
8
9
ACRES
I~
<(
W
...J
al
o
Z
:it
o
...J
w
m
w
w
VI
GRlt.PHIC SCALE
50 ~50 100 200
~_ \ I
( IN FEET )
LEGEND ~
-> >-
EXISTING CURB a. GUTTER
PROPOSED CURB a. GUTTER
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WA TERIoIAlN
PROPOSED WATERlolAIN
EXISTING STOIllol SEWER
PROPOSED STORlol SEWER
-I 1-
->> >>-
-:>> >>-
EXISTING PAVEIoIENT
26'
.
DEH01ES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH
DEH01ES ENVIRONMENTAL lolANHOLE
EXHIBIT 20
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
18
17
pg.5Q I !
" f--j
016 ~-~
. r-i
-;......+-
pfl20 : I
I I
_ -GP~ _ \--1
7
~
SEE EXHIBIT 2L
~1'
...I
N
I-
iD
:E
x
I.lJ
I.lJ
I.lJ
III
%~
I':'> , _
~~':= ~ .
~
., w)
Z'"
:-0-
....J.
I
I~)
I ZOi }
1'_?-'._ ~~
I I I
! I !
~
SEE BELOW
QUAIL AVENUE
SEE EXHIBIT 2D
I
I
o
I ~ ~ '"
-1*___,'"
~ I
_____J
()
::0
I'T1
III
...
'"
"
f'
e
DONA LANE
@ DAWN
16
is
2"
r--,
I I
#910 : '*
I l
~ i ........._
---~
P900 i i
~--f
I I
I I
-^ ~--i
--!-"i--
P!lO.5
6
...........,~' .
, - ..
1--- . .
I I
~-1
L_J p!lOl
5
@
DAWN
ACRES
14
13
',2
P860
pe.5(J
36"-1
'.t::~~
.~
.~~
.7 j~ 1._001 =^-_ _\....
1---, 'Y
~--i
~--1
L__JJH861
HI'
--=:;n~1- - --:-
I I I
I I I
I I I
#851 I . #80' I
2
4
3
ACRES
~
SEE EXHIBIT 2B
~ I r 'r11. :
.~ I'
l' !\,
I ~
:~
:~'i
"U
)>
::0
^
... ~
<J\
~ l
~-?I. .'
j \
~
- .1-
;- '"@.
It~
~
\.
..
'" ~
,.
"'h1!
~O ;~
,~.
!~J
SEE EXHIBIT 2B
r--,
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1-
SEE EXHIBIT 2J
'\ l_____*l
W'
~ "
~J~
01
e:::
<(
:J:
U
e:::
p7.5Q r--, g. J i.'.
110 I
I I
I I
11
SEE EXHIBIT 2J
~
'"
GRAPHIC SCAlE
50 ~5O 100 200
k.r-.. I I
( IN FEET )
~ LEGEND ~
>-
-> >-
-I 1-
->> >>-
->> >>-
.
26'
.
EXISllHG CUllS II GUT'lER
PROPOSED CURS " ClUTIER
EXISTING SANITARY SDlO
PROP05[D SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING .ATERMAIN
PROPOSED .A TERIoIAIH
EXlSllHG STa'!M SEWEll
PROPOSED STORM Sl:WER
EXISTING PAVEMENT
DENOlES PROPOSED STREET WlD1H
DENOlES [HVIR()NM[NTAL MANHClLE
EXHIBIT 2E
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
0:::
N
I-
iD
J:
x
w
w
w
VI
""
::
~
r----
! ----,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
! /5JOO
I
,
I
,
,
,
"
I'
"
"
"
" ,
Ii I
~.++.
o
[II
<(
~ '\---I'
(f) ~,~' ~
).' --
---1
I
----i
I
____J
o
5
"
n-
~
::;
c
E
~
oJ
~
Ii
c
E
~
~
"
"
"
"
>,
is
:;;
"
"
;-
'"
is
x
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
~
~
::-
pJf5
1
HIRD ADDITION
" ~
-, "
~ -
/3
ii .~
GLEN DEN TERRACE
~..t'>~
SEE EXHIBIT 2Q
'"
"
//
tl
,"
~
i!
(f)
s~
r
"......
>f~l;td
'"
"
LOWRY TERRACE
-------------------,
r------------------
,
,
,
,
,
, ...
, ...
i - ~
,
,
!@
-----------------1
I
I
I
,
,
~I
II
t.:ll
wI
I'
3
~
I
t.:l
GJ
I
r
W
...J
...J
:;
~ .,
~
<::>
~ ..
...
1;;
~
e
~.fO
ri
W'
:::11
<('
>1
,
,
I
i
,
,
,
,
~~
i
;
i
~
N ~
I
,
I
I
J*~
I
,
I I
, I
I ,
-e'
~L..J
(>
'"
?
I~~(>
I
~ --=::
I
e
\
\
GEARTY PARK
><
0;
r+-----
LJ-_",
SEE EXHIBIT 2P
LOWRY TERRACE
I r----------
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
I
II 5
,
, AJ8<J
,
II I'
II III
II ,
II I i ~
:: ~ :!
\\ I ~I
,\...l' ~
==.::1:1
-------------------------------------------~---------------,
R. W. WORMSBECKER ADDITION
CD
4
pJ60
3
pJ.fO
,
,
,
i I _) _
: I ~_?f-"
: \
<Cm5
~
~
~
_SEE EXH'.': ,2M ~_
~r r 1'. .--
~~I ~ ~
~ * .~~~ ~ .
L.. ? 0
___;;i: _ """"'---/?'-"''-- ~
::::l "'.-
__O_\-_ f?' ~
- <(
0:::
~ 0:::
~ ~~
~
~
~
;-5022
~
~
<<
<<
;l5Mf
J2
'"
~
/ _ {;i; 4J'
'i ------~-- '" ,::;, "
-- -----n<; t
_ .:s: -- l
SEE EXHIBIT 2:::::s::::.---- (.:) "< !!
'"
~
~
~
......
3
r-----------,
I
,
I
I
I
I
#JJO
;I5.JtJO
z
o
f=
Ci
o
<(
\
\
pJ25
2
pJI5
1
CD
WOODLAWN PARKI THIRD ADDITION
o
z
R
GRAPHIC SCAlE
50 ~ 100 200
~- I I
( IN fEET )
'" LEGEND '"
->
->
EXlSTlNG CURB '" GUTlUl
PROPOSED CURB '" GUTlUl
EXISTING SANITARY SEVwUl
PROPOSED SANITARY SEVwUl
EXISTING WA lERloIAlN
PROPOSED WAlERloIAIN
EXISTING STORIoI S~
PROPOSED STORIoI SE\\ER
>-
>-
-I
->>
->>
1-
>>-
>>-
EXISTING PAVEMENT
26'
.
DENOlES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH
DENOlES ENVlRONIoIENTAL IoIANHOLE
EXHIBIT 2F
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
SCOTT A VENUE
->lL
4
8
CJ
)>
~
5
PfJ75
6
p725
7
/$85
~
~
0,
r--,4:,.,
I 0: ~
L--O::...._;
.g-r'
,_,1 ~T1
I :::?:, I
I ,<(";-1
.- ::r:JtJ
~ I
r:----
-~T~T--l~
.J..l__l_J ~
: ~
I
~
~
--t
0",
~
'"
,.
~ :--1-::
~ L_.L.J......,U.
r
1-1
(/)~I,
~ W
, Z
~ <(C)
r--~T or
, <(,
t _:FJ...
I
t
I .
I .
Ql
I
)0_
I;
. .
....~--,
r-r' f I \
,~:-"-__..J ~
1 ~ <'
@
CJ
)>
~
'"
D-4
.0
~.
/'
/\
+---"'\
~,
, ,
+--_ r'
I ""'--,
.... I
SEE BELOW LEFT
I
-_. -~
)>
(')
;0
[']
SEE BELOW RIGHT
SEE EXHIBIT 20
7{=:
-_/~
'l..
N ~
~
=
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 ~5O 100 200
k..__ I I
( IN FEET )
'" LEGEND
a~ c:
~. ,I
'e jf
EXIS11NG CURB & GUTTER
PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER
EXIS11NG SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXIS11NG WA lERlAAIN
PROPOSED WA lERMAlN
EXISllNG STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORlA SEWER
-> >-
o
N
~
m
I
x
w
w
w
Vl
-I 1-
->> >>-
->> >>-
EXIS11NG PAVElAENT
26'
.
DENOTES PROPOSED STREET W1D1H
DENOTES ENII1RONlAENT AL MANHOLE
c_-
;5/'",
HAMPTON 'ROAD
MARIE LANE WEST
\ 7
""9'0\ /
1 ~ \ \~
o!5fro ~""'
,..--, .(' .....
o I
I I 10.
16 d4\--' 1A" rf:) 4'
_0j~tf-.--0---- l~___
r.-. _ l
SEE ABOVE
/$70
SEE ABOVE
2
) ~
r_e'60
o 0
I ,
.....--....
o ,
o ,
~--l
+-
pI51:'
~-~
tJ !
-::>'---~
2.,
.!$: ;:,
<( ~
1"::'
~2\
I~
I lU---,
To:: :
------~
30"
o
"::.-.--( <
~
~
~:;O
- ---......
o I
~--i
, I
I---~
, ,
1..__J
- -n-- ~.~
, 0 'B
, , .(5(J25
-r- -48 -
L-__.J.I":"\
, ~
t---- ~...
~"'\.___J ~/O!J
2
~
-~
~
24"
o
r------,.-Tl
, I I'l
L-------l_1t I
~ L.
SEE EXHIBIT 20
!:>
,tISf25
~=i---1-
I----j
I \
I \
, 1
, I
L.____.l
.s>
/.5005
6
7
,
I I
) I
Ja:--
SEE EXHIBIT 20
@ DAWN
ACRES
EXHIBIT 2G
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
MARKA Y RIDGE
o I WESTURBAN
\
20 I 19
ootlI. f
30"
o
I
I
,
, I
t--1
1&
17
...
",
~
"
,/
'-.../
\
'"
i3
~
~
\
I
~
.
~
.'-
~ao ~
::
~
...,
~ : 6-
h~---l
J-lt-----J
SEE EXHIBIT 2K
SEE EXHIBIT 2K
SEE BELOW
ORCHARD AVENUE
SEE ABOVE
~
J205S
3
ss
- ~
'-,
0,"
---L-
>
pI21
pUJ
.-2157
A~
Q'
iE~
;;>... ~
~'<;(
.'~"
0:";
1:t'=.
~ ----,
GRAPHIC SCAlE
50 ~50 100 2'
k-""- 1 I
( IN FEET )
~
PfJ..'f
r~
I'
I ,-
I
,
I
r---,
1 1
1 I
, ,
I I
I I
'.----:... -~r-
~.) I
1"--.,
, I
, I
I ,
I I
1----1
, I
-@r----tT - --
~
tv LEGEND tv
~ 0.
.> "t, A':~)
<,/'/).0--
'.......... .
~
~ ~_\
SEE EXHIBIT 2L
Q''';;Tir~-F
I , I
Pl35 I L__J PIJ8 I i ,..J I I
L_.I ...._--1
3 14 I '5
11 I 12
01 WESTURBAN
->
>-
EXlSllNG CURB III GUTJDl
PROPOSED CURB a: GUTTER
EXISllNG SANITARY S[ll[R
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WA TERMAIN
PROPOSED WATDlMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM S[ll[R
J
-I
->>
-:>>
1-
>>-
:>>-
EXISTING PA'JDI[NT
(
26'
.
0ENC1TtS PIlClFOSlD STREET WIDTH
DENOTES DM!lClNlllIEHTAl MAHHOl[
EXHIBIT 2H
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
i
~
,.,
"
ii
"
:;
Q
~
~
"
"-
"
:::-
o
C
<
u
,;,
3
:J
Ii
o
C
<
u
Q
~
~
"
/
>-
:;
:ii
:J
"
;;.
'"
x
"
/
~
~
~
~
/
>
:J
:;
,
/
~
/ ~
., "
~ -
/ c:
.. OJ
n .~
L.
"0
)>
;:0
^
NORMANDY PLACE
SEE EXHIBIT 2M
SEE BELOW
I
I
~ ~
" "
" "
"'" ...
------
pf>.RI<.
~
~
~
~
____1_
~
I ~
-----------\--------
~
<0
\
~ ~ ::.:
fl::
<{
0...
e
~ 0 ~
l( - <{
--l
Cl
0
~
'"
----------~--------
~
~
N
~
~
(5)
~
~
lD
\__&----------------C-e3
. \\ <!. '" :II
\\ 0- ~ U.
'"' I:' \
a
::.:
fl::
<{
~
'"
SEE EXHIBIT 2M
SEE BELOW
SEE EXHIBIT 2C
PERRY AVENUE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
____________J
SEE ABOVE
"--\
\
\
OIl
'" l
"
1'LYfA/
I-'AKK
8
7
'\ '"
~
--
8>
~ '"
%
-~t---
-----; f>.RI<. i
I
I
I
I
I
I
4 I
I
~25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/29J7
P9fl
_____----r---
.--~~OOLA '/IN 10
I
5 '
6
3
P.901
P91J
'" l
...
'"
~ ~I b+ V~\ I r i 11-'~i-1VII I! II I " ~I
I
I I I I ~-j
'" I I I f-4 I " I
I I : ~ " I -4 i , I i
" I, , I ! ! I ,
I I : I I
I I I : I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
i i i pg.J6'! I I I I I I
/2.9O(J I I P.912 /2.92" I /2.9~ Ji2.9.f2 lPgH pooo ;:J015 ;:J025
I I I I I I
12 I I 13 14 I 15 I 16 I 17 I 18 I 19 20 21 22
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
} II 28.lpl I I I I I I I
I I
I WOODLAWN I PARK i@ I I
I I I I I
I , I I I
'" I I I I I
____________J L..._________ _
F------' .------------- -
---- I I
I I G) WOODLAWN I PARK
I I
I I
~ ----- I I
I
I 11! I 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
-----~.L....I !
SEE EXHIBIT 2B
~
~
4
~
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 ~O 100 200
k..""_ I I
( IN FEET )
'"
y,
'" LEGEND '"
->
->
>-
>-
-I
->>
->>
1-
>>-
>>-
26'
.
EXISTING CURB ole GUTlER
PROPOSED CURB ole GUTlER
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WA TERMAIN
PROPOSED WA TERMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
EXISTING PAVEMENT
DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH
DENOTES EN\IIRONMENTAl MANHOLE
EXHIBIT 21
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
PERRY AVENUE
~
SEE EXHIBIT 2A
J
2
I
I
---J____
.,. " /
peOS 11f2555
r--, #2575 po95
I I
'"
L
~ k~"'-"
- -1- -;*::--- .
d I;;; 1 . ",0 '. t-
. I' I q" q q I
r- 1;2600 ) p"'"
I I ,
I , ., ,
'-. "~ . ,
14
5
r---,
~ \ p#-~ 1 1-'
. \ I i ,2-185
. I I
J.=.:l-L- - - -. ~ ~
" _n___ _ _ l-- ,)- co,
a
r--'
I I
I I
1---1 p5~
,I l
:.l. i<l__~
-----g .eg. ~-
" ---- ----
n ' ' -- -
" " __~ . . I I
, ' 'It- I '" at---1
~" " -J q "1. 12440 I I 0 p.j80 I- I
. ", ','.... U' ,"-',
, "" . ' ' .-
, q
I
,
LOa:
~ I
SEE EXHIBIT 2A - I 1. DAWN
9
10
ACRES
SECOND ADDN.
o
1
'"
SEE BELOW LEFT
MARIE LANE EAST
~
!<i
\:i
22
SEE RIGHT
~~Il ~r
~ .1 L
<Cr:
ORCHARD AVENUE
,H750
It)
SEE EXHIBIT 2E ~,.EE EXHIBI~~~
SEE LEFT I.' _ G_ T-'W,
W,,; I ~ 0 I'" 0'
I- I ......i: .... Z;, = I ~ .-,,c(.
VlJ" <(I I )c'!Q::',
<( J ...J . ----, p751 21' 0::>-
' -Till1 ~ I .~_
I I Vol :7..:'" <( \ r---' .
I I I ". _--' I I I
L--....Iii , , Z) I I ,
~ ~~l . I oJj0~' ~...~L;.~-i*,r~ ~i l
!!! ' q ~=-'. ~ , ..",
~ . I (.. <( .. -'<e----,
'<(tI('II ~' I
~ . \ , . --__1
. . . +---~---. " -'-'. r I~ ,."
. \ ' . - - ';, lel'_ 1--.' . ".~ '0_. ...
~~-_!~1--e~ffp?70~r' ~~! I - '1", \-\P77O r '~7;;*' )-, --
.so 1 1 .I~700 I I I, ~75(J I . I 0 ...
/ I ,.~, I, I I ....... ^ " '" ..
/ / \ \ I < 1 r",:". ~
m I ~I I, ~
/ 4 ~ \..:..i '-l,.'
5 ~E EXHIBIT '20
LEGEND '"
s,
DAWN
ACRES
P9CJO
20
2J
21
~
,
~
((-
((
9l
~
-- 0
~,~.._- .
v-v j I
t----<,
I I
PB01 L___J
6
P8"
'0
Q
B
7
@
DAWN
ACRES
SEE ABOVE
->
->
EXlSllNG CURB at GUTTER
PROPOSED CURB .!l GUTTER
> - EXlSllNG SANITARY SEWER
> - PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WAlERl/AlN
I - PROPOSED WAlERl/AIN
>> - EXISTING STORM SEWER
>>- PROPOSED STORM SEVIER
-I
->>
->>
~
EXlSllNG PAIIDIDIT
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 ~50 100 200
~~_ I I
( IN FEET )
)
26'
.
DENOlES PROPOSED STREET VIl1llH
DENOlES ENVlRONIoIENT AL MANHOLE
EXHIBIT 2J
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
WINDSOR WA Y
Sf
~
'"
'"
28
o
WESTURBAN
~)"''''>
27
26
pUJ
pf57
#2f'10
15
PERRY AVENUE
SEE EXHIBIT 2T
T'
--- - --- --L.
.---
----
-----.....
I
--.
I
@
WESTURBAN
~/JI'
5
I I
I j
-J~:
,- ..
L --~
pUf
Q---
0-
~
pf~
3
f5)
WFSTIJRAAN
25
6
3
pf6J r----'
I I
1------1
,J.d :
~'i'1
0.4==7
to
14
"
~,
23
22
.0.9"0
;.222-1
~
7
~
~
r
~ ~
'"
.,...
"W
~:I'",.,
..'-J......::::.
"t:)
'iE'.
;).;
,'"
I r.~'-,
1 ~Q:' "
S
,:. -
SEE EXHIBIT 2H
2
/220J
,--,
! \ ~--- i!i
1----1 .
~-'=1--- 4. . ~
-; _ _ _____ :I:
:'l /,/ X
'_ _/~ ~ UJ
t!I ' /~
->
-I
->>
-:>>
26'
.
..... LEGEND .....
EXlS1ING CURB o!l GUTIDl
PROPOSED CURB o!l GUTIDl
EXIS1NG SANITARY SEWER
>- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISllNG WA lERMAIN
I - PROPOSED WATERMAIH
>> - EX1STIHG STORM S[W[fl
:>>- PROPOSED STORM SEWER
EXISTIHG PAIIDI[NT
DEN01E5 PROPOSED STREU WIDTH
DDI01E5 DMROHlolDITAL MAN)l()l.[
EXHIBIT 2K
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
QUAIL AVENUE
~
*-
2
/
(
\
\
\
<(
N
I-
iD
~
X
lJJ
lJJ
lJJ
VI
4
J
#505
5
6
p~
&585
22
2'
r----- i
, ,
,..,45 ~ 1
, I
a I "
'_..l.._i---~-
- -~. '--""'......... >-
\ / ~ i !
I,' ~__-j
: r ~__-j
~--1-*~.lt--~
,(2505
2"
P625
ps,s,s
'9
18
P575
12~~,
\ .
~
o~
q
- ,.....--r*-
I ,
, I .
t--_.j
, I
, ,
1..__..i
r---
1'0
I , .
Ii'"
I / '
, /
, /
L__" -I25~
12
"I
,/
I
I
: ,
/ ,
L__../ P580
l'
-,. -.. -f',_...,.._.,.;-<; J
~--i \:J.
~--i coa
I I
, I
I
9
;'2500
11
o
-'-.'f<JO
B
I
I
a
~ r
, I
,0
"- ....
'--5'.
'........ ,"
! -'- '--''t
w
z-
oo:(
.l.J
.lc
IZ,
'O'~
o~
:.,
L.
0'2600
13
-<DAWN
16I
ACRE;< I SECOND ADD;<'
SEE EXHIBIT 2A
SEE EXHIBIT 2E
ORDWAY
l-
N
l-
iD
~
X
lJJ
lJJ
"
/
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 ~5O 100 200
k,..... I, I
( IN FEET )
.,
*"~. f-~
'..1.~_ - --r--J,
"... I \
I I
, ,
no.J{i; I
'--_J
~-
jI2050
~ LEGEND ~
4
---.>-
-> >-
EXISlING CURB & GUnER
PROPOSED CURB & GUnER
EXlS1ING SANITARY SEllER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXlSlING WA TERMAIN
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
EXlSlING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM ~R
3
o
"
G'Ol.Dci\t
~'t
~~
'11,-
-I 1-
->> >>-
->> >>-
EXlSlING PAVEMENT
p7Jo
;<#720
,
,
,
26'
.
DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WlDlH
DENOTES DMRONWEHTAL MANHOLE
."
..
EXHIBIT 2L
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
QUAIL AVENUE
~-'~
.
. \
\'~ \~' \ \ \ \ plJ1f
\ ~~\ pl00 \ P12O\ \ 9
\\"\\\ \ 7 \ \f9I
\ \I II 0 \ , \ \V
II \ , WOODLA,
\ "\ \ \ _-------L---------- ----_'1._________
" L-- ----:.-- -----------T----------- ----1
~ -----------..-..--=-------r WOODWA WN I
--- \ II. ....--- ------ I I, 9, I
--- '\ ' ------ I I I
\ I ~ I 3 :
'" I pts :
I I I
pl0l , I I
I I ,
\ I !
' I ,
I , I
t I r---7 :
II \ [--....~/ I : ( :
\\ I ' -'....' I I,.r--, ~--i I
\\ I 1/-..---1--1
'\
.~--,- ~
..............~ ~
"
..cr,z,~
~o
10
----------
PARI<
2
iCl..rg
CD
N
I-
iD
:E
X
w
W
W
VI
W
N
I-
iD '
:E
X
w
W
W
VI
SEE EXHIBIT 2B
SEE EXHIBIT 21
SEE EXHIBIT 2S
QUAIL AVENUE
~
~
-------
FREY ADDI;ON1l r-------------------
CD~ L J
G
I
.1
IIv
III
. ff
~ ).. v
- _, - n,f,;j
)"ii]
fiOOl I A
I
ALFRED
3
.;aJ~
,.'
.L_
'1
"
"
.
':i
~
...
.;aJ1S5
.;aJ1S
PJ07
PJOl
~
, r
, I
\ I
I I
I I
I I
H
I I
P2S1
I
I
rlQi
I I
LI
I I
p261
.13271
p281
o
co
co
"
....
n
~
:
~
"
.13201
o
i:
<
(]
co
co
"
"
>-
----
v
o
i:
<
~
, .
, '
o 0\\
~i:;;
o N
~ I..- " \ fi
4~1
~ \I ~
VI " ,..~\
\I "
'\,v.
~
, ~
~
.......
~
"7-
\~
""
SEE EXHIBIT 2C
,;,
~
ri
28'
(l
"TJ
fTI
o
~
io
N
.;aJ12
.;aJ20
:s
;;
"
v
;;-
:;
PROPOSED IRETAINING WALL
Il~T
...
)>
o
2
=l
o
z
)>
o
o
::i
o
z
l
:::
:s
.,l
"
~
~
l
"
~ ~
<s
x
V
"
co
co
co
co
"
>
"
~
;/
pSl6S
p270
p260
1
( TERRACE ADD.
SEE EXHIBIT 2S
" ~
-, '"
L -
" "
ii .~
SEE EXHIBIT 2F
pl~
\
\
~
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 ~50 100 200
k.r- I I
( IN fEET )
'" LEGEND '"
->
->
EXISTING CURB '" CUTlER
PROPOSED CURB '" CUTlER
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WA TERMAlN
PROPOSED WA TERMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
>-
>-
-I
->>
->>
1-
>>-
>>-
EXISTING PAVEMENT
26'
.
DENOlES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH
DENOlES ENVIRONMENTAL MANHOLE
EXHIBIT 2M
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
>>----- ~~~ -
))
8
,.--,
, ,
l I
, ,
I Jlf931
I I
- - +---+-,.-
! I . ----
-----..,
r- \
, \
, '
P9~^,3 \
\ ,
\ I
\ I
_ ___' -L- '>IL
... "I --7f'C_
, ...
~~. ~'~'-:
. I
q ".900: i
, ,
l__.J
_ _ --+-+- -v--
I I -0--
""ki .-
I~ I ...
" .
l__J
I
I
I
f
'"
%. . - .
SEE EXHIBIT 2T
~
~
8l
35
37
~-~ ~)>
r--,
, I
I ,
A95/ t I
, ,
, ,
I '
: l'
r I
-t-
,
i-'
~
ry>~
AUD.
SUBD.
NO.
SUBD.
NO.
361
7
r--'
! ! -"20tH
I ,
I ,
I I
~---j *-
~--~
,_..a_
~--~
5
plOI
P021
~
\
\
\
~--
~
RL~ I N~ 150 ,
~2//5
'2157
---D~.
:--1
U' ~
- ~---~-
! "~
bh
-" ';.
0-
~
IS
SEE EXHIBIT 2T
REGENT AVENUE
-----
~-~:r=--
r--, 5 j . I ____, 3
I i PM5 r--7 I! :5~
I I n~5 " '---1 P-
I : L I' L___4
I I ,__. r I 0
,--~ I I ,---. N
~t=,'------ -4Ce--t=14_1---_, ~
~ -:--= -..: . -..: CD
":: ->>- ->>- ->>-- ': -> -: ~
~ 1'---/ ~ W
,- -, - /':'\-1_ - -<.~ -r--tl- - i - '. -, O. w
,I>..:.J. "" "II)
~--l "l I I I I ~
I : P~O P~O I IiI,
L -' I L____.
- L__J P500
~~
--------
P~~5
8
;-- \ f242:J
\ \
10
9
I
-a-i~
, 0
: I p<l-lO 1
L__.J
1~
11
12
13
G)
DAWN
ACRES
;;;
4
3
~
32
3"
L
~
GRAPHIC SCALE
~ ~ 100 200
~_ I I
( IN FEET )
LEGEND ~
-> >-
EXlSlING CURB 1Io GUTTER
PROPOSW CURB 1Io GUT1ER
EXlSlIHG SANffAfN SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY S[~
EXlSlING WA lERIrlAIN
PROPOSED WATERIrlAIH
EXlSlING STDRW SEWER
PROPOSW STORM SEWl:R
-I 1-
->> >>-
-:>> :>>-
EXIS1ING PAVEMENT
26'
.
DENOTES PRCPOSED S1Rfi1 'MDTH
DENOTES EtMROIIrIDITAL MANHOLE
EXHIBIT 2N
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
..
~,..,
.?fa,- - -b+--I_ _
. I I
I I
I I
I '
I I
1 l__J
0500
(4)
DAWN
ACRES
0.,
...
o
o
.---, ~ 2 ~ I 0
i I r-l ~.
f----; P.5a5 I I {'?5~
I I . I
1-----4 .... I
I I 01 I
1----.., f tt-' .
--<--- -,-- Q
"'---1 ~ I I o..~u', {.
~ " _ 1::")_ , ,_ '.~ '-
~--<., ::::::--= ~'1' := - =-==--=
->>--=- ,- -)
"'--,
P-185 I ,
r f
>----1
~ - - - L_-*...- _ .+-..J
., 0, ~--i
I- - =---= .
m :::..>>--= ~>>-
J:
X
IJJ
Itl )-
Vl 0;
/2585
'':'--1--r-u
I __
, , '
I I 0>
" .
I \
I \
1..-___..1
/2.500
I
I
p~:
I ,
f f
, ,
L__...1
- ---r- .p"- ~
, rq-.,;- ,
I .
I I .,
, \ a>
P.sJo--.1 .
- - -)-
-{rl
I-l
f I
L__....I
"
p.5tJO
13
,..
'5
cr
DAWN
ACRES
'SECOND ADDN.
- -+---
I
I
REGENT AVENUE
"
SEE EXHIBIT 2D
I
O:s: Ol.
'*:
II
J~ .=
~
,
(
',./
CD ----JT~ ,.
--". I
~ ! I' --.p;=
/2650 I " '>.:l_ I
I ' v.i
L : ~~-~
__...I ~7 I t
.3 ~--~
I
I
~
REGENT AVENUE
SEE EXHIBIT 2G
'"
P6.50
5
~
)>
()
::u
rrI
Vl
,
,
"
,,/
\...'
.0
I'
-'
/(
6
~
/\\
L,{~~ \'
/( \ \
\ \
\ \.,
/
1/
Vl
SEE EXHIBIT 2B
o
(Jl ,
'"
~'=-:i- -
~
;; ~
----t-lJ j l po; ~
O} J- Jl-f*-m--,~
SEE EXHIBIT 2D
...,
~
~
~
~
9
o
)>
~
., ~
'oj
.,
@
)>
()
::u
rrI
Vl
~
o
o
o
r
)>
~
'" ~
"
'"
-0
)>
"T1
"
SEE EXHIBIT 2B
EXHIBIT 20
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
~
GRAPHIC SCALE
so ~so 100 2'
k..-. ' I
( IN FEET )
..... LEGEND .....
~
EXlSlIHG CURB & GUTTER
PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER
EXlSllNG SANlT ARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXlSTlHG WA TERIolAIH
PROPOSED WATERUAIH
EXlSllNG STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
- -->-
-> >-
-I 1-
->> >>-
->> >>-
EXlSlIHG PAIDIEHT
,0
26'
.
DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH
DEHOTES EIMRClIlIolEHTAl MANHOl.E
tfl
" \YI\~'ij
~ "'~\<. (1)
p925
lD
C'l
I-
iD
:I:
x
w
w
w
Vl
lD
rt)
I-
iD
:I:
x
w..--
~)
'\
.....
\
'..
.~\.
SEE EXHIBIT 2B
REGENT AVENUE
,0
",\li)\~O~
129ft
"tJ.
J- ~
~
~
~
G~"I'-'\"'< 'i'"I'-'i-
~101
W
-"Ow
Vl
1
..qY
PARK
9
2
:3
REGENT AVENUE
~-
~
i
,LLEY IIjSlGHTS _-.1
PROPOSED RETAINING WAlL
GOODRICH ITERRA~~'--l
-----
r--
1
-1
i
1
,
1
I
,
,
,
i
1
QI
=<! Q
!;ll =<
"I 0
01 ..,
~: !6
zi Vi
~I ~
~l r
1-<1
I '
I I
1 ,
I ,
1 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 ~ 100 200
k..f.... I I
( IN m:r)
::-
CD ------,
I
,
I
,
,
1
I
I
,
,
I
I
,
I
I
1
1
i
I
,
I
I
1
p2Jf
2
~~f
1
P2"
o
"
"
,
;-
~2f
L
,
!]
E
<
~
o
lD
<,
:0
WN
W,
Vl
~
Ii
!]
E
<
u
52
:)
,
.--
>,
)
~
"
;-
:n
? I ~J200
P2.20
~J(J
~~
"
~
.--
,
.-- ~
-, "
~ -
.--~
ii .~
DENOTES PROPOSED SlREET WIDTH
DENOTES ENVIRONMENTAL MANHOLE
~Al
011'1
:..>
mAl
Al
P:>>
Z
:J::::j~ ~~g
0-<;::
;::>1'1
I'1rZ
VlI'1-1
,,0
>"TJ
Alr
00
1'1-1
ZVl
/,r-- REAR~ANGEMENT OF LOTS
/<~_______15,16 ~ 1 ~OIfE~E GARDEN
J//
PJ55
2
.PJ~
:3
.PJ"
~
p.J.JJ
.PJ2f
~
P2~
,..--,
~--~
, 1
Ol--~
1 1
...--04
-r
!---
~r--' I
1 I
I ,
: '
. I
,
1
tn
1
1
10
N
~ LEGEND ~
~?j} If
, ,
1 1
1 ,
'-__...J
>-
>-
EXISTING CURB '" GUTTER
PROPOSED CURB '" GUTTER
EXISTING SANITARY ~
PROPOSED SANITARY S~
EXISTING WA TERMAIN
PROPOSED WA TERMAIN
EXISTING STORM ~
PROPOSED STORM ~
o
->
->
-I
->>
->>
1-
>>-
>>-
pJJO
<4
i
___ ALF~~
.PJ20
. CD~
I
1 GODFREY ADDI
~------
------~
FREY ADDITION!
.-----------------------
I
I
26'
.
.PJf2
EXISTING PAV9AENT
P2~~
p2N1
ALFRED G
J,
SEE EXHIBIT 2S
EXHIBIT 2P
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
SEE EXHIBIT 2B
~ ~
"'~ 1 r-------------=-~~~=
I I
1 1
I I
1 I
L .
~
Ol
p.905
5
\
u!
N~
l-
iD
I
x
w
w
w
en
pOl5
t!
p910
PART or 12
SCOTT AVENUE
fJ""
14
---,
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
WOODLAWN
PART OF 12
pl5
11
PARK @ THIRD.
p25
10
ADDITION
p9J5
Z . .
I ,
, I
I I
, I
I I
, ,
I I
I ,
\ I
I I
I ,
, I
I ,
I ~::::--:::::::::::--:::::::------------
,
I
\
,
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
p05
. I
r--.l,
I !
SCOTT AVENUE
~
~
SEE EXHIBIT 2F
I
------------,
"
;:
~
:;
2
c
"
"
...
n-
~21
PN5
~J1
~'"
1
p211
::-
r--'"
1 I
I I
I 1
1----1
I 1
1----1
1 1
"----I
,--,
...--~
"
i:
<
oJ
w
u
<(
~
~
W
l-
>-
~
o
...J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
____ P!~--Jfl ,.~# I
........ I
-----:::::::--J
GOODRICH ITERRACE --1
::i>
~
"
Ii
"
i:
<
oJ
C
"
"
-.
/'
"
1
1
I
I
,
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
,
1
,
1
________Y-~~~Y1t:1.;1QtL"!:~______J
~
;;
;;
"
~
:;.
~
,-51-10
p210
~20
p2J2
<>
3
4
;;
x
~
/'
"
"
"
"
/'
>
"
;;
o
/'
t
SEE EXHIBIT 2F
/' ~
.., "
~ ~
/' "'
ii .~
SEE EXHIBIT 2R
,
,
WOODLA WN
~ffJ
'"
I
i
1
I
I
I
I po20
I 1
I I
L_~g!i~JQL~pgJ
p050
:E
o
o
o
r
~
Ol ~
// \
,/ W
>
~
o
po.lO
8
7
z
o
l-
~ --
SEE EXHIBIT 2R
:-----CD-,-------l
I 1
I 2 ~
I 1
I ~"'~ r'
~
fTI
SEE EXHIBIT 2S
-G---~~~~~~=:
~"9
~
~
'"
SEE EXHIBIT 2R
-'
o
z
2
PJ21
~-J7
PARK
~ '"
<:s
'1l
)>
e~
~
;0
o
)>
o
o
:::i
o
z
~ ..
I:l
.<~<-
C'l
'"
,.
'"
~
."
,.
'"
~
o
o
r
)>
~
~
~
28'
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 ~ 100 200
k."'\. I I
( IN FEET )
28'
1
1
--'
~
~
4
CD
jCJ20
1
------------------~---------------------------
/,r-- REARANGEMENT OF LOTS
I' ..,....,.. .. ...... "...... ..... ........_..
SEE EXHIBIT 2S
,... LEGEND ,...
->
->
-I
-I
->>
->>
>-
>-
1-
>>-
>>-
26'
.
EXISllNG CURB '" GUTlER
PROPOSED CURB '" GUTlER
EXISllNG SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISllNG WA TERMAIN
PROPOSED WA TERMAIN
EXISllNG STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
EXISllNG PAVEMENT
DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH
DENOTES ENVIRONMENTAL MANHOLE
EXHIBIT 2Q
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
I
""""E<
~ r
~
I;~ Q'l~v-
It It' Ji I
II II
~
~
Cl
U
<(
...J
:J
:<
~
"
l'
I
]
!
) I
!t~L
I WI!. ====
I 2: 0--->
I a::: r""O-==
CljV/1. .,.--
, t I I
U r I I
<{ I I :
::::! I \ I
...J ' I
I . ·
y
..
'i
o
~
~
~
"
"
"
i
"
o
E
<
oJ
t
"
Ii
o
E
<
oJ
o
~
~
~
./
>-
"
:;;
"
:u
;;-
::
~
:u
./
~
~
~
~
./
>
"
,
./
./~
-, <lJ
~ -
./ "
n .~
SCOTT AVENUE
6
p,J52
pJU
o
4
~
~
~
~-----------------------
DAHINDEN'S THIRD
~
~
~
PJ55
pJ55
4
3
2
ADDIllON
REARRANGEMENT OF LOTS\~\
15,16 & 17 YALE GARDEN \ \
HOMFS \ '.
:.:: CD
0::
<( 3 4
lL /.U20 /.UfO
~
<(
..J
0
0
3 ~
TRITON DRIVE
~
\
GEARTY PARK
OUTLOT A
on
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 ~ 100 200
k........ I I
( IN FEET )
'" LEGEND
~
...
I
_____J
!.\l
~ "'
->
->
>-
>-
-I
->>
->>
1-
>>-
>>-
26'
.
SEE EXHIBIT 2P
q~!
oM
J
J
,
~
p55 I P-15
6 , t ~M
WOODL~WN @ 4
PARK 2 r, IRD A[
ill
"> r9
f
~
- ~
~
~
...
/5J85
~
~
N \
~
~
Sl
SEE EXHIBIT 2F
EXISTING CURB '" GUTTER
PROPOSED CURB '" GUTTER
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WA lERMAIN
PROPOSED WA lERMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEVtER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
EXISTING PAVEMENT
DENOTES PROPOSED SlREET WIDTH
DENOTES ENVIRONMENTAL MANHOlE
ti: ' ,
.s::- I I
= I'
3 i f--.~
. Q//ifi
_______ [] , I 0
~ --~-------iiE--J / ~
_:>. " I I
I -- '<{'__ ~ I i
- I I
~___ . I I
" I I
I I
I I
, t-----
, --.
co
<:5
---4J
~I Q: -------;--------------1
o ,. I
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.--....
~",.,., = ~ <<----<< <<-
r<-<_<_<_
(
" $
~
/"l'...
<("
....../ /~
on
LAYOUT
SEE EXHIBIT 2R
a:
N
I-
iD
:i:
x
W
W
w,
VI
?
~
~
SEE EXHIBIT 2M
:IIffP! I lJ~{------
:J I I' 1
Z
W
>
i
~
"
~
~
:;
0
"
"
"
"-
"
:
Ii .....,
" ::z:
- C)
0 iE
E .
< ~
u
,;, 0
;:
::J
Ii
0
E
<
u
0
"
"
"
..-
>-
:5
:;;
::J
"
..-
'"
:5
x
"
..-
"
"
"
"
..-
>
::J
:5
"
..-
..- ~
.., lV
~ -
..- c:
::J
ii .~
is
~
.S7:
I
l:J~
,J
-. !
- . :
,
115007
!ii
~
THIRTY THIRD AVENUE
~
r,(jJ
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
<'
"', /
" '\,
" ,
~' "
O"s,'>" ",
Q-~i0
Q-<:k
'b_
~
~-
THIRTY THIRD AVENUE
III
~
~
p.920
p.9fO
p850
plIf2
I
I
I
I
!
,
I '
"-~
,(2 QU
~l:
.SZ
r.-.,
.,& )):.., >:'
N
_.---L~< (<
l.......JY <<.
0 ltref
:
I
I
t
, \
I \
I \
~,
PROPOSED IRETAINING WALL
p927
p9ff
P<U5
pa.Jf
R
~
1""-------------
!
--~
,
r----------------
,
SEE EXHIBIT 2M
SEE EXHIBIT 20
j
t ,'"fT--l
W--'
I~
o
U
8
t
~
I15fSO
...
--,
I
io
N
W
~l
I
!
~
SEE EXHIBIT 20
I15fJ9
1-----------.,
I ' '
... l /
c>
p7~
WALL
~
~
THIRTY THIRD AVENUE
r------TTT[~
I I I I I I
t I I I , I
L______..L..L...L ..J.
1 ,
SEE EXHIBIT 2P
~ II I
I
~>-~
wr--:r:
C)~
z
<(
J:i::
a: 10
<(--:
WI{)
a:~
,
I I ....
l l""'~ ~
, ,
'. \
, ,
, ,
'. \
\ ,
, ,
, \
\ ~
z
~
<:1
- ~I
@
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 1 ~
i ~
!REARRANGEMENT OF LOTS
115.16 & 17 YALE GARDEN
1 HOMES
--------------------~
io
N
SEE EXHIBIT 2P
1:;
~
~
p8tM p7SO
~ PROPOSED RETAININ
I , , ,
~
(( ((
(<.
"'"
~
1\
II
II
Will
:J II
Z (
~
<:
0
0::
P807 <:
I
U
0::
0
tit
II
II
l r I \
p72f I p70f
~
"
~
~
~
O,t
:~
~
o
...J
W
In
r"""",,~
--,-w
W
VI
1f5OO7
GRAPHIC SCALE
~ ~ 100 200
~- I I
( IN FEET )
'" LEGEND '"
->
->
>-
>-
-I
1-
->>
-)CO
>>-
)CO-
26'
.
EXISl1NG CURB & GUTIER
PROPOSED CURB & GUTIER
EXISl1NG SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISl1NG WA lERMAlN
PROPOSED WA TERMAIN
EXISl1NG STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM S~
EXISl1NG PAVEMENT
DENOlES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH
DENOlES ENVIRONMENTAL MANHOlE
EXHIBIT 2S
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
SORELL AVENUE
G)
WESTURBAN
MINNAQUA DRIVE
I
~Ii
"--..
'" ~
\
NO. 462
~
-- R.l.S.
I
I
I
_l
.
I
I
A I
6~4'.d$' oj
:.
3 III
~
4
)..~4'
~.
~
C I
0:::'
,., : <:/P -It!'
, ,v._.>---.-'12d
"II ~.1
/5100
'r
,
I
..J.
-
....
-0
"
,.,
'"
~
<::>
pg#
fi9J6
d2
P880
r-,
I '
I '
I I I'
I , 10 12'
r,-j ~-I"'"'\
f:-~--~-___~
.;.. ----
;'4.955
24~-1
p~
P.925
.l'M75
- ~
I")
o
I")
,
W ~ ,...
-::> " ..
LZ.J
-I~
'<(
'"~ 'J~f.
. I W~.
tCk!
I
L------]
I
6
5
4
3
2
@
WESTURBAN
ci
z
fl,
// '
/ ~
/ '
,r.'
M
of8
,
_l.___
,
A------j
SEE EXHIBIT 2N
/
<t
~
:..------
------ \j ~\..\..~'<
\:P"'\)~~
~
,>
vi
-i
0:
~
SEE EXHIBIT 2N
./"._ ~n-
",~ .,~ ~>(
---{, ~ 'K~'" ,.\
\ T ?5:>~
/" )~
I ~ r
~\-;
I
.'
~i~
1"\ '..
SEE EXHIBIT 2N
- ct. II 11 r:..~
:0
WESTBEND ROAD
~
~
--
---j
:
29
~
I
f
8
~/'o...>
;-
I
I
I
!
'--
GRAPHIC SCAli:
50 ~50 100 200
~'"\- I I
( tHEET )
------------------
I
I
,
//
~J
7/;
II L=l
SEE EXHIBIT 2U
0'
'" LEGEND '"
5
. --.---. IDASlJlG CUIl8 .at GUTIlR
PRQPOS[I) CUil8 .at GUTTER
EXl'S~ SANITARY srW[R
>- PRQPOS[D SNlTARY SE\lIEll
EXl'S1JlG WATDiNAlH
I - PROPClSED WATEJiMAIH
> - EXlSTJfG STORM SE\lIEll
>- PRQPOS[D STOflM SE\lIEll
[XlS1lNG PA\lDlDfT
DDIOTES F'RCflOS[l) STREET 'MOTH
DDlOT[S EIMFlOINEHTAL MANHOlE
ci
z
~
p.9,~
48'
'~-
1-- 0 .u_
t,
" pg25
10
I")
7
ci
!!!
~ I
26'
.
6
..'......, J
'-,.
SEE EXHIBIT 2L
EXHIBIT 2T
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
c
#
o
t
~
<:i
/
/
/
-))
-,
I
I
I
1.......
))
8
f.... -----'1
I \
\ \
7j"~ T \
\ \
----
---- --- .
-----
~
~\
~'
\\
~\
~ \
/~/
/f
~.v'v // /1
.jJ / I
{_ /1 I
<:P I
50~ /1 \
.. -" :,
\ \ \
\ \\
\\
---
--
\
\
\
\
\
'\
~ --))
))-------
AUD.
('"--"'l
I I
I I
"~f/l :
, ,
I ,
I '
, I
r----,
I I POOl
I ,
I I
I I
I ,
~--..I
/' / /~
, . \0//>/
/ //
/' h'/
/'" -//
--- /,
-- ~ /'
~//
---- ~ (
-- ---
- -r--
MILL AND OVERLAY
TOLEDO AVENUE AND SCOTT AVENUE
...~
------
~:-~----~---....~
'-
'\
('"--,
! I
"-
....
'-
----
- -:-::--
--..:::::::::-
,
/
~
~
\
,
""
"
/
/
/
SUBD.
361
1
I NO. 150
[
NO.
SUBD.
361
R.L.S.
NO.
7
4
~,
0-
";
r---l
P"5
t'2.(7,
-7
SEE EXHIBIT 2T
~
GRAPHIC SCAlE
~ ~~ 100 ~
k..""_ ' I
( IN FEET )
/
/
/ I
// /
./,/
~
'"
~
~
",
~
9.
-------
R.L.S. NO
"
,
B
12"
"
'" LEGEND '"
.--.--- EXISllNG CURB'" GUTTER
PROPOSED CURB '" GUTTER
- ~ - --- - - EXlSllNG SANITARY SEWER
-> >- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXlSllNG WA TERlotAIN
-I 1- PROPOSED WATERlotAIN
- >> >> - EXlSllNG STORM stWER
->> >>- PROPOSED STORM SEWER
EXlSllNG PAVEMENT
26'
.
DENOTES PROPOSED S1REET WIDTH
DENOTES ENVIRONMENTAL MANHOLE
EXHIBIT 2U
PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT
'<
{p
x~
't't?
~~
,j,
I,
I.
DI~
~ I I
1 I
W
:::> II
Z n ,
IJr:I.~
>,,:u
<t: I,
~''\
o
(;)}
V)
1111
REGENT AVENUE PONDS
\
\
\ ~
\ 0 l("\ "-
m ~
:::::>
(f)
SEE EXHIBIT 20
-f ~r--- I
I , /
~ t /
1- ----------1
f - --3-6~---J
o ~ 0 /
, '''''
, 30"~
:iIITIO
o
:::::>
<{
r"---,
I I
1 I
-- \,
."."<'7<'0 '. i
.l ,
, I
-" ;
rJ I
...~ I !
~... I
I .... _ I
/ 1
I :
29
,
,
,
~
..---
ill
1"1
o
z
..[
I _:
I ~1\
I J
I ,9te~
----
I
I
(
I
I
I
o
m
:::::>
(f)
+.
ii "I _
! ~08"
I :
, I
SEE EXHIBIT 20
1'-.
~
~
"'.
o
J
SCOTT AVENUE POND
#2670
9
""
')
~
~
i
,
j
I I
: ~ I
I Z I
(.P~ '
- r~ --~
I ~ I
,0
,t)
,v)
I 1 I
: I
I
I I?" I
([) - r~~66/} I
t I
i: 1
~. -----4
v~ ~)O'H~~PT+ _ROAD ;~
,....--,. C)
N
I-
m
:E
x
w
w
w
V>
T,
:28'
I"
<<
.-'"
;'--f~--- - - ~-=---t-- - -
1 I
}--- --.!
I I
I ~
26CC r-----i
? I
L____.;
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 I~ 60 120
~~_ I I
( IN FEET )
'" LEGEND '"
--------- -..------------- EXISnNG CURB & GUTlER
PROPos[[) CURB oll GUTlER
- - - > - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
-> >- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
- EXISTING WA TERMAIN
- I I - PROPOSED WATERMAIN
- >> >> - EXISTING STORM SEWER
->> >>- PROPOSED STORM SEWER
POND BENCH - 10: 1 SlOP[
EXlSnNG PAVDlENT
26' DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH
. DENOTES ENVIRONMENTAL MANHOlE
EXHIBIT 2V
PROPOSED PONDS
2008 CONSTRUCTION SEASON
w
'-'
o
0:::
rn
I
S98 sgO s8'1ss161~S68 SS601aS6~ /, \ 33SS , fa,8 s66 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ as,1 SSII $
'h /4" ~/o,' S Z Ii) ~ ~ ~ ~_ .:i---:.nu " ~ L
.SCOTT~AVE-N~"""'SY'l: 33~SqSS8 >j56~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \~ 1.80 ~"3.9 SSIO SJ
lI~A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~st 3333 .q9jO .'9/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~yY ~ ~ 333&' SSSS SJ
"--S3/S ~ as asIS.>j5.... r:s~1I J3H .-DRAKE-R[ ~"''' - ~SS.3;
'. tl~ iJ 99to 9S15 33JP ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.61?" '" 3JJ? F---;;;; :::...
6 .~0,.n ...Jf--~~ !\S!\S~ SS.3uS~
sr.1"".p&! S3PP 33H SJlY J3H aalt n"'l? ~ J3".J' ~ ~ ~ ~ i/
.,/9 ?"_.p S OJ"" :J~V -' ::)l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 33H Z SSJ $
~ ~~~PJ33d" 616U 33/" ..,jOO a9:[133~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~?Pd ~ ;
33~P "'--4liiiiiil\r .J..3E 1! I N '#i :;
3.J'SPtlt5....7i 3.J'~.9_ ~"3.9 3.J'~.9 3.J'~9 SPd?? ~.9.?? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~?o" 4 ~
p' I' .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1-=-2- ~l:
3.J'~S I ~,JW j.f.J'~S ~ 3.J'9" ~ ~ ~ Z 3$0 I 3.J'~.9 ISIO $
3.J'~" J'.J'~4' 3.J'~" 3.J'~0 3J?" Q .... Sl> 3.J'SP ~ -
r.;-;;::;:; r--. J$P .... \ 'i' ~ ..40 -- 3.J'~S ,..---
13.J'3/ 3.J'3.J' 3.J'3" ~~ 3$" ::::!~~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ ,ll' \ 3.J'~P 16to a,
3.J'H b ~ 3.J'H ~ <( ~1,~ ~I'( \3.J'JP 3.J'~" '";;;i8Jl:.
~ ~ ~ 13H" (r) 3HP 3H" ~_ 3.J'S" I"'; ~ ~ ~ I ~ 3H"\ 3HP 3.J'3&' ~ 7,3t
~ ~ ~ l5J3O I S"~P S"JP <(~ 60~ S?fJ1 ,966 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~LOWRY <( ~ fJ.
ITR ~y!
~ ~ >9999~ &'"dS" L3"~S) 3/~6' ~~:;J!~ t!~
\cS \cS ~ ~ ~3/3.9f12 <:. 3/~.J' - 3/.M<(3j.J'~fj.J's ~~
~ 9 9 9 ~ ..1'''39 'l3"J19 , ~ 3/"~ ,.,,"s Si,l 9;
~ ~ ['?\ t?\ 0 f?\ ~ .J'/JP 3/.J'S 3/.J'~ ?fJ ~.9dd ~8~ 3/0" 3/Pd up" =;too ~
~ ;...>:~~ 3/P" 3"Pd ,9 ~ DR Jf"-
~~ ~ ,6 ~~ 3/Pd , \I\\a~ ~ jOtB jOt5 IjOtB gUts ~ ~
4~ 0 6S,6 ~ ~ \! 6' 6~' ';3tJ?J '1 3d3~ 3P~ I' ~ -r ~ ~ ~ I q(J16 1.q(J13 1.'10'6 .q(Jf/ ~ ~
o '~l ~ ~ ~ 300P ~.J 'j ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ilO .nOl .nnIJ q(JOI ~
Z $ ~ ~ ~ I ~ *.1"" ~ '-!:. "%i "....;;-~ Sl> ~ ~ > .quu- :r !JUv' -
~ \\) ~ ~~~ 3d3d ~~ ~~'((1 -- ~~'t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '> <( t911 t915 t916 8915 .J'N~
~ 60 \0066 ~ ~ ~ ~s /1~::! c.P~ s M~~ 191~ tOl:! ~ g9/~ 1910J ~ ~
= rp 'C.ns6 ~ ~ ~ H~ J I :.P.9......p - 'IJ~;;' ~ ~ I 8910 t911 58910 t911 0 ~ '
w H~P \SU ~R__"" :.P.9J1:r '.39-" sr-... -'nl: HJ'? >- nJ: ,'1 0::: '/ Z g996 ~
I- \, 3P.J'S ~ H.J'&' ~l Zi3DI..l9JS7 .9P" 0::: 9.qjv 999, 0 S618991 ;;;jl_
~ HJP I ~1 ~1U\ ~1 :::;5 \ ~~~9J~ ~=~I ;;:::: :,t ~ ~ ~
~ ~ I ~ ~ V 100 z906~ SP39 ..P.9O" y.. '~~~l6lg900 t901 tgOU t901 ggUO t90t 2~
-CULVER RD CULVER_
~~95 ~ ~f L ~ '8JP N8S o,1llo'V\ot'rI I A9~~! " ,sJf'~9~ i If l' pp,1 ~,
s~&t?, ~ ";.6I?S ~.J'BdO .J'8el'S 6II'016ll~ 60rJJ 6010 ,960,9S0 ,9?fJ ,910 ,900 ,pO ,8S0 ,800 ,160 ,1601,100 ~
~ ~ ~ "b , DAWNVIEW lER tBfJ
r--::~~~~~ :r.:::: II ~! ~W\ \11.1 "Ii ,gt! I'IJ1 ,f " i. ,1~:fI" ~.
c.:i :;/"'7 ~ ~r,-s J?ss ~6:~~.96'P j960 ,9'Pl ,910 IjgOO jpO ,860 ,sOD 1 j1fP f<!.l/'/O '7 .
~ w 9 G 9 f .~ 'V(~O'<(J?~ [ IN. I A ,., #50 L,
l~ CL AAA U3S ~.J'~~/5 \~.9"~nl~~~I~:~~ 86~nI18~: 18~~/~:~1t110 r9G5~~
I I 34TH I I
I I AVE I LJL
-
-
-
J>.J'~P
3.J'30
3H8
~ ~ I ~
.......OWRY
~
I>)
r-
o
o
-
-
2009 CONSTRUCTION SEASON
(SEE PAGE 2)
.
.
.
~
NO SCALE
ey
EXHIBIT 3
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PHASING
(PAGE 1)
G: \DWGS\CITYMAPS\ADDRESS.DWG
~ ~ ~
2008 CONSTRUCTION SEASON (SEE PAGE 1)
w
G
o
0:::
t!l
l Of i ." I '''1 ---L--""
ULVER
RD
- - CULVER -
U -mm
nn ~ ~ 6".JIIIS" 6 9"~"'9~ 916~gd' tlJ ~&i'li ,sOl i ,'fI6 l
9h:- --..... ~, II Ilh~;"IItf111
~" DAWNVlE !!!!!!!!!!
. ~ 1~~;;'~.~ ,.M?ljg6" ,9 ii'ljl l'i'll'll} ~
'9:: 9 ~~~~ ""If" - ....1........ ....... ... ~
I?'H ~ 60 '\. / ~ -~6 ~ J ~.;."" gto ,00 ~?". g'fOO
ee~- <(~! y-- t6tJfJ 11,6 ~{e695 .M. (I~ LA ~_o~
e e ~ ! ..,0 I~' rI ~ t61f1/6J15 g6'IO p5 II; 18f' l,of l,~.,6 Z
8 ~ C f- sO ~~ ~ ~ '1655, 1110 1155 t
9 :ii dIi2 ,. "'" JI6' P "" 'lit
~~~ 1~06 ~lll "."~ ~ l!l
.JPl~\ ,'C1~~' ~!!!!!. , pe5~ lij
8m e~eG~ 15101515 piO!pl5 piO
~( ~91~ ....1".1....... l!!
~;:-:@ ~C:. pF jl8fJIJ1D5 I' pP p,o
J33 "fH. ~ C ~ ~ 1116 ~6' pl5 l,t110 ~
~~I~ j ee;iiII ~~/5R ~~ ,i'iO l ~sO ,1,0,.,00 <(
~ ~ fBJj - tje~ N.II?~ 1150 -- 6 U6 DR_
~~ t\\111{' 99.....~~/1
~~ ~roP Jm ~ee~ , ~ /".-c:?
~ \.~\~~ ;r I i- -
" 4Y.T17 \ ' r~.M ,,~ .eN3
~ ~ 5111 N.M..PA2l ,4al..... IV'
HP/-.P .N.I'I? .uu ~ - - j.,r.6'P6'" ~ #l'
i-- ...- ~ .N/!7/.I'A'/P htF3 htF,
, ~ .N/!7/ Z -:;;; H6YI Hn b6'P -;;,;; :;;;; Hn p60 p6"
1164 I, HH __ H" H,3 H" hU -;;;; JN3 pll piS
pp p#8 .wtI?7<~~ ~ W.II?'.Ih'?, ~H.II? JH? It;;;- HH 1;J'fb ~'
"" tJII' -J'SI._ ';... i'iii;;; :. ~? 8WJ~ .
"" "'" -~~" I.~ ~.... AU< ~~
\ ---:;1- ~ N._ .RD_~
ty" ~~ ..ll?PP ~ ~.II?H 'lj9,1 9' ,,,S" '.6'6 ~ l?~ ~ :>
, ~ '< A?P/ ,sO 0.' ~"'/~r V
~J\'1..~ ----:;;w~' n h',1 - .... ~
DULUTH ~zr.f.lW /N/-3 ~ ,161 ,,6 9' 9' ,816 '.6'6 . di6 fI f
I~I~ ~~~~'
_ "\.\.~~ ~;y~ ~i~~ "....---.'..,.....
~ 0>.tb 6'6' fgtJIJ ~ .!. z Il1 /.6'.w /~.6'N
~R.M' . ~ t:?\ t?'\ l.' ~:!.\ . 51 M. . "._ "._ I ...",~IY.t11
~
~
NO SCALE
2009 CONSTRUCTION SEASON
EXHIBIT 3
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PHASING
(PAGE 2)
ey
G: \DWGS\CITYMAPS\ADDRESS.DWG
.y.n..-.o..T':y'-Qf-C~~~f~~ ~1-' I -------I-----"'!4f~~E"R.-.l----.--~-------+.."'!.f1'R"'.Jrn.---4------.....tI
\1: I 11\; 7 .' \.. ..- ],-..., Ii: r': ' IT')-- r'- r-'-l .01(----',.. .0 ~
i re.,., A E'N '.,- / , ,.1"1 I I I I , '. j , I ,.-- ..; - I ' 'j ~ 1 --I L --- l. cr
SCOTT V, -<,' I ' In.. , " I I 'I' ~
6'- ... --, " \ I IZ 'J I' I \ ,- __..L.,.. I.. - ,I 1
v . J. -..UJ I ,I I .' I I'
\ \._ ..j \ I I .' \ "-"1 i!i:( .' 0 KE"RD .. . A -. I : i i -/ I roO .- I
I , , l I '-, -.. " , . J ' ' -- I 1-
, ,J I, --- " --: ___L; . -'-1 Ii' . -- J;;r . I I 'I I I -- -- I I i -1 I '
I \ " I I I'" \ J -... -. --,.., I ~
I I n~";--"~' . ~---..--oot ; 101_ 1--1-1'[-,1. I I - I "I,' I.' L ...!- J f~- ll~.,
,.......,...r~'"I I ,i I ;! . i, I! I - - -1 -' 1 . : -. ,: j -- I I" n_ ~ -
I ,_ .n.L.._ . ve . _._ .._ -.. - , --' I, I.' ,
115' : N-._ .- ..- -!'''' ',' _.,33Rr>AVE N, 'r'-j; : ICflOSSLA..!.-. -- I I --~ <
m' -- , I 'J 'Z, : I I , . ...., I ~\ \ ( It - ~
, I . i'." I I l . ..-...-.., "
II -- .oo- ml --. ; I . T--.> ' t,., i I I ;.. ; -..I .-'1 ,S ockman- \' I' I r '.. 0 0
z t ,< ~ I 1>' " I . I I . . ZI I . [
I J'- woo..,-, '.. \"" }-,I,'-...;." .-.. '. Park ,\ .W ,IJ' r""
I _ _ _ _ _ '>1 t- _ ' , . I' ~' . I -. - -' >. . \I J
I' " ,"", I - W ,. - -,' - --I \ \ ! ,\ .. , I I . . "10'" .'- . "" '1' z
, . . ..-- I . I-I"'~- C> nnl I:;: \ ' \ . L.\... ,.. i i ~n-A-J"-. . l'~ \
I 1-1 I W ' -=u "i,ER \ ~ ..- -,,;--,' l>-~- '
Il: - -- . T' .. I -. , r -- ,8, ---, -- - :i~ i _JOI 2o~~r 'r j'- i .! ! j I. . j -- 'Il . l I><! L..J ..~ -
, I I ---. m - 1.-11. I I ',- I I .' roO .1._ ~ I I, I" r Iii"'" "'"
, , I I ' " I( I , .: 'I, - z' -- ..'" . -, I I' - I --
. ,I III 1 ' ' I; : 1, , I I .
:::::..:-_J -'-'i.OWRYiE~--r' )'" ': .'.! I LrOitiR.Y,TI;R I ~ - I --~ I' Ii t.. J1j t:J ~
-- - roO / ; J _. i __ ...Loo! .,<;(! .1.. ,-\ _ ..J: i It r 0
Valley , Gearty I" ! f I 7 ' ,: I b," , '~; I ! I -T -- .
[community . I -f . !,., ,i - !. . '. '-'0"'''' i ;<t....1 ~- ,-_. 'I. -. ~
, Park (. --..' " ,. I '.., ,''''' ' , I .' \r
Presbyterian I - . I,' ;" I' ..~.- 1 \ :",,' , 'w, ._, - .1 .
I I . 'I' I: I, " I '51 \ ,'WI' \ I ....
Church "-'- __.1 '1. --I t. .... . .oj--"'" ,"'''-'\.\ .,. .,...
l- I 7 .~ Ii, __.' }: '{~\t6'~,\)1'-., i ; I r- .,..\ \.. \ . "'" \ \ .~
__.__ .,~.~ \: I, . .' ,.,-f 1, II ZI--1"" __ j._ ~', \- .J.;. I I
-- ~ ...'-- .1,1 "I' , J 'I' I" I .' \
~...~.~.n ( .'..... ' .", ! I \ . .' I ,'-!lJJ"- .-. - I I.. ---, J \ i I Of
I \ = _ _/ ... /. ~I I ...~ '-\ lz! ~>I I ...' . E,-:~Q,Ai." I' .. - I ~ ,1.
I \ '. . ' "".'~. '/. - '.. \. ' '.' --, -- .''''' -.- - -- '.' ; e 11:0" , I I " !:.
"'(;)\ 'I n' ~ I , I, i I 'Wi : !. I !' I I . ." I'" I
..~ f ,..P' ., '....:', "'-'pi i;(j 101. --,.. . 1----, --, ' ;! I
''1- . , ::! "''-'iM''''o'i. . ,0::, I :' , ,I . Of
-01;": __ .~.. . ;' ~ . HOR " I :>-'" -- ;<!, - It, .-. -, : J,.
Iv 'J. . ~.'~...J '0: !:I:l I , J I
I '1'\ '. "If -- -t! i' ,0-, ; ,ll.., I iffi .~: ' ". t. ~
. I ~ "', . 'Q. 0 . , N it
. __ '::}, I 0
! II " ~. ~ <& ~ ; I - i: i I Rice'~
. I w' , UJ, ~ I I: . !
.. I ~,. :r, ,,' i I . Pond
..:. ,< . C:ULvr;;R kD u' CULVER RD
t. I, \ ~LVE~II.O..~"....if..."'...'1.I..."......-........I.."................,.....
Ii ---I ~ I 0 I I I '~ j t : ~ I' .: ~ 1 I' I !
. . U - ,: - I ,. . " , . , - , '~
I , en 'I i I I" '- '
~. \ ' 'I ,DAW~VIEW TER' _.' I ,,: : '~:!
L . I \ I' I t I ' , ZI' , J> I I~
. .' . .," 1 1 .. ~ I I 1: i~
. " ~ I' < 1'-, ,1
. ! OONA LA '0' ' ~
__ .__..\ . . ~ 27TH'AVE N '
f .1 I ' ;'. i:t
. : I ! .Z: ;. .... - ~
.L' .1."-, g; \. . 0
. ; t I CJ ,"" MARIE LA we, MARIE LA E ;Z z
..---~ ,._-~-"11"' I' ...'. ' W g; w
.'1'i' b -t'; <: <::;
, , , ret ' U . , . 0::
'"RE1'l1'!.~'~ II . m W ; :0 -. 1 u!..
, I' I I P P' -', ..., W
,. . , I I-jAMPTON RD ,"" Z;z ~,~ I -' ..
III ./12: !;' W' Noble z .
II II , ..,...,..,. N - I '.~ : \~...., Elementary HljMPTON Rr> '1- +
"i: . "'f f;;: 0: 0 School ' III
l r ::J a:: I I ?
, .' II " . , I a WI; "" . ...
W : \' I '.. Q. . ui I
~. \! ~, CJ . ~ : I MERRiBEE D~ 3. I
rd 't t . . t:l .'
G: . t ~ ·
Z I'. I i ~ ~I
~ !!! '. . , . I
. i ! ' .. ·
; \ ,f . :,' .'
lr\' q ;.\
;'II,,~ ~
I ' I,
i, ! .
II :' I
" i it
'. WESTBROOK RD .... II ~I'\' 'lc'''''''/>-'
, ! \I '.
, ~., Ii,
,. .'e
....!I i i:
d:.! II \,\\
Ii'" It'
fi . H z
MNDOT District Office & I ,r I Ii'. g;
State Highway Patrol ,I" l~ .\ . ;:
",. I \' ~
Iki4 t \ , ~
,'l; th~ l'rth
,'fJ 0 . I-
(.\)~ lion . ,,,-,,I \-
IJ~f/ac I. .)'J \-- r.~:"-""". .'.
~,., <~~--,~.
Si~cla iPon~ t~' ! 11} JJullith Pb~d .~~
. ":';.~~ .1\ ! 'II V'i I . . ,
~\\' I ..
\,ttt I . l
I I 6 .-<
. I I' St. Croix ~<<' ..
I . I ! ~-~~ ()-~
Three Rivers Park District Master Plan
New Hop~f!ysta1fGold~ VaHey Corridor
"
_.._...... . I .1~'
- --. - :i~"~J~~".:--~ --~=~.
i
~,/>-N~l-te8TER DRr
~ ~1' )>
m 0:: "1.. ~
~ '" "'c. 'i,
~. ,t, 1-",,,,, -Y1"i:R v
.< IA~~ <<. .
~ '<,'<-'<$' ,oz z
,~ I1l
i:(
I1l
Z
~.
Hall
ah'.
es
n
e
,r-
e
~
g
e
'fvi;N
Po'4-
"'~,
;' 1-
WYNNWOOD Rll
-/0
lU
'"
""
WESTBROOK RD
., .
"
<3
~
m.
Z'
'"
'"
.to
WEhMORE WAY'
KENNETH V;'AY
I
'Z
'W
<;(
><
U
~.
if,
Z
'"
l<
.CO:
W~lI f~ERlfy tA,
Z
W
'"
""
~
I-
m
W
0::
o
~
<<
.,.
C"
f
1:
~
('
t"
,.
..t
,e CITY OF R
l' I .
--:;r---.--.+--.-----.~~1iV
U,
"'-'''1-
"'1p
"1"
BASSETT CREEK LA
! , .
, ,
Z
I1l
'"
"",
W
W
-'
z
W
>
'"
W
-'
>-
'"
(JJ-
^ 1'6
'ft~
",.
"
~~ '
'r
W
'1
",'
-l'Oi\l
!~,
!~i
-'
,-,
,,,,,.
,>
.".
jZ'
0::
13
.>'
W
-1
g
"
Z
"
HE"'THBROOKE
1 CIR :
1:
olS>
<;,.
.0
;0.
,) - Courage
t Center
I /1 ~ ~
.l. \ '\. . 'lt~v
sweeiPefl; ~ 'S........I ~0 ~(
ark, ~el1eyL.~
I
1.
Q::
."
Q::
o
."",
;.i'~~~:";
Hey
EXISTING AND PROPOSED
TRAIL SYSTEM
Existing Trails and Walks
Concrete Sidewalks
Asphalt Trails
Concrete Pavers
-- Unpaved Trails: Agg-Lime, Woodchip
-- Private Walks - some with public use
Public Property (City and other agencies)
Community Facilities
c
c
Sidewalk Committee Plan
"- - Priority 1
Priority 2
Priority 3
Comprehensive Plan 1999-2020
(Parks, Open Spaces and Trails Plan
and Transportation Plan)
. . .... Proposed Local Trail
Three Rivers Park District
Existing Regional Trail
Proposed Regional Trail
Hennepin County
Bicycle System Plan
Primary System:
Bikeway (On/Off Roadway)
Secondary System
Independent Corridor Trail
C f_ L
III
Date: November 2007
Source: City of Golden Valley Engineering
700 350 0 700
1,400
Feet
N
A
- -
-- - ----
Exhibit 4
5.0'
2.5'
J
BROOM ED
FINISH
4" TROWEL MARKS
(SMOOTH FINISHED-
TROWELLED AFTER
BROOM FINISH)
EXHIBIT 5: REGENT AVENUE
SIDEWALK DETAILS
2.0'
3.0'
4.0'
2.0'
3.0'
ACTUAL DRIVEWAY I,
(MIN. 14.0' MAX. 25.0') ----I 3.0
7.0'
4.0' WALK
3.0' APRON
2.0% ---
-. ....". . .. . .-.. <i.. . .:......: 4!11. .:4..... \ 6"
..,.....'.4... . P////~
.' .., : :.> '; <~ ...~. ...>:. . .......
. . . ., .
APPROVED FEBRUARY 1, 2008
.~
CITY ENGINEER REG 23110
SIDEWALK WITH 2'
SAFETY BUFFER
(AT DRIVEWAY)
ey
GV-SM-022
EXHIBIT 6: PRELIMINARY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2008-2009 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 08-1
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT RA TE= $4,400.00
RESIDENTIAL - DOUBLE BUNGALOW RATE= $8,800.00
RESIDENTIAL FRONT FOOTAGE RATE= $62.28
MULTIPLE DWELLING LOCAL FRONT FOOT RATE= $74.88
MULTIPLE DWELLING STATE-AID FRONT FOOT RATE= $66.70
COMMERCIAL FRONT FOOTAGE RATE- $74.88
STATE-AID STREET RATE= $1,100.00
STATE-AID FRONT FOOTAGE RATE= $80.99
RES. L~EDASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITY/STATElZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
1802924210001 4700 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAMES SCHAUB 249.95 1 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
1802924210066 4735 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 VALLEY OF PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH 500.65 2 0 $31,180.48 $31,180.48 $31,180.48
1802924210002 4740 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P TARNOWSKI & P TARNOWSKI 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210003 4780 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THOMAS P COX & OKSANA M COX 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210004 4800 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JEROME L WHALEN 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210005 4840 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 W P MEYER & P K MEYER 109.81 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210046 4865 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C & C MISNER 100.53 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210006 4880 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 N & B BIZUSKY 238.88 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210047 4895 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J K & L B DICKSON 100.53 1 $4400.00 $4 400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210018 4900 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SHELDON J RESIG ETAL 251.01 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210048 4905 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J T VERTIN & M C ROCHAT 108.53 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210049 4925 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 K Y MILLER & A M OTTAVI 110.76 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210019 4950 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GLEN A ACKERMAN 239.44 3 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210050 4975 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P E JOHNSON & G P JOHNSON 120.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210032 5000 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DOROTHY J JOHNSON TRUSTEE 231.19 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210051 5005 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D A COSSI & P M MCGOVERN 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210033 5050 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M G SCHOMMER & E M GERARD 247.24 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210052 5055 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 T B HENDRIX & J A HENDRIX TR 227.44 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310053 2900 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D J JACOBSON & L J JACOBSON 205.20 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310062 2901 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KATHLEEN MARIE SCHMITT 190.10 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310054 2912 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M COONEY & A CLARK COONEY 98.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310061 2913 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P S HANSEN & K K HANSEN 77.25 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310055 2924 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GENE T BERGLUND 90.04 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310060 2925 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 WARREN E LEVAKE 95.38 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310056 2936 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R & S EDWARDS 89.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310059 2937 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RONALD L TAYLOR 76.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310057 2940 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DARREL G RATHJE ETAL 231.55 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310058 2941 CHEROKEE PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C D LINDQUIST ET AL 200.93 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340101 4715 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CLAUDIA J ARONSOHN 100.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340002 4747 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KATHLEEN MARY BURT 100.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340003 4801 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CAROL F PENDZIMAS 100.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340004 4815 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R R HAGEN, JR & S R BAHL 100.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340098 4827 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THOMAS J MCMULLEN III 87.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340097 4901 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JUDY KAY CROCKER 87.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340096 4907 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 A B & D D CHRISTENSEN 87.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340095 4915 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M T BERGER & A M BERGER 87.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340094 4927 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BRIAN T KRON ETAL 87.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340093 4937 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LA TRISHA A HILLMER 87.00 42 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340092 4947 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C D MEYER & J L MEYER 212.99 4,42 1 $4,400.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $4,400.00
0702924340100 5001 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOSEPH A GOOLEY 213.99 4,42 1 $4,400.00 $2,200.00 $2 200.00 $4,400.00
0702924340099 5015 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M S ERNST & C D ERNST 77.00 42 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330048 5027 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D L COLEMAN ET AL 85.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330045 5037 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M P SCANLAN & A B SCANLAN 78.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400,00 $4,400.00
0702924320005 5038 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KEVIN D COURTNEY 280.92 5,42 2 $8,800.00 $13,200.00 $13,200.00
0702924330044 5047 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R B ERICKSON & B DERICKSON 213.08 442 1 $4,400.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $4,400.00
G:\PROJECTS\2008~9 PMP (08~ 1 )\Mai/ing Usts 2008-09 PM? Project No. 08-1\2008AssessmentRoll
Revised 05/18/07
RES. LEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITY/STATElZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non.MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
0702924330047 5305 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C A FRANZ & L L FRANZ 271.60 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4400.00
0702924320026 5320 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LUANA J BALL 105.31 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330056 5325 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 E & S VOELLER 130.82 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320027 5360 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S R KINNEY & S 0 KINNEY 104.84 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330055 5365 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MICHAEL HOULE 130.00 42 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320028 5380 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 B J DORN & M J STANG 105.00 42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330052 5385 CULVER ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J W & B L ANDERSON 252.00 6,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924340018 4700 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GREGORY ROBERT JONES 223.40 1 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924340017 4750 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KEVIN D ELF STRAND ET AL 102.61 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340046 4751 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 K M & V R FLORENCE 209.27 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340016 4760 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G MOHINANI ETAL 102.61 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340015 4800 DAWNVIEWTERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S L HOWE & B K POHL 102.61 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340045 4801 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D L1NELL & P L1NELL 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340044 4821 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D KITCHELL & K KITCHELL 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340014 4830 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P&RWEBER 102.61 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340043 4851 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ANN BROOKE CHRISTENSEN 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340013 4860 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 E A FREEMAN ET AL 102.61 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340012 4900 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J A VEIGEL & C L VEIGEL 102.61 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340042 4901 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 L P FONNEST & J H NEPP 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340041 4905 DAWNVIEWTERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MITCHEL WACHMAN 107.85 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340011 4910 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P & M PRANGHOFER 102.61 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340040 4915 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S K O'DONNELUD P O'DONNELL 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340010 4920 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 T G LEPPKE-HENNIG ET AL 102.61 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340039 4925 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 K D WHITE & K K WHITE 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340009 4930 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J A WILKER & M C WILKER 102.61 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340038 4935 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M S NILSEN & A C L NILSEN 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924340008 4950 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAMES J BRENNY 214.03 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924340007 5010 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CINDY L AURNESS 214.92 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924340008 5020 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 HAROLD E WALTERS 103.50 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330005 5030 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R R BLOMQUIST/C L BLOMQUIST 103.50 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330040 5035 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SOPHIE TEENER TRUSTEE 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330004 5040 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R J LAGERMEIER ETAL 214.92 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330039 5045 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 E K LANGHUS & H L LANGHUS 226.32 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330017 5125 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PEDRO 0 & JUDITH E DUELO 101.02 7 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330049 5300 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 EDNA L MILLER 140.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330050 5320 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CHARLES ALEXANDER 153.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330051 5360 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 A W ANDERSON & B A ANDERSON 145.51 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330053 5380 DAWNVIEW TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R C NELSON & K A NELSON 151.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340047 4750 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SARAH J HAUSAUER 189.27 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340056 4751 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J T WEIGLE ETAL 211.42 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340048 4800 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J H OPATRNY & C M SMALL 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340057 4801 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 EDMUND J MACK 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340049 4850 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 W R GRAMOWSKI & K R STONE 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340056 4851 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 FERN R KENISTON 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340050 4860 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D J BRINSON & A I L BORZI 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340059 4861 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JANET L NELSON-SCHWARTZ 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340051 4900 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J WOZNIAK & M RUDOLPH 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340060 4901 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DAVID L GRIGGS 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340061 4905 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ISABEL V LEAF 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340052 4910 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R WVAN AUKEN ETAL 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340062 4915 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G T WILEY & A D WILEY 311.45 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340053 4920 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CAROL A HUNTIDOUGLAS T HUNT 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340054 4950 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KATHRINA RAMNARINE ET AL 107.85 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340055 4960 DONA LANE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C NOERENBERG & K FORD 193.44 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240021 4790 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 H W NICHOLS, JR & A L NICHOLS 89.71 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240103 4800 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAMES PATRICK REYNOLDS 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240022 4801 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DANA E EVANS 89.20 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240044 4810 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S R GARREN & K A GARREN 94.93 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240101 4811 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KAREN ROBERTA WIESE 104.35 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240045 4820 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D M & M A GRAZIANO 165.19 9 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Mailing Lists 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\2008AssessmentRoIl
Revised 05118107
RES. LEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITY/STATElZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
0702924240048 4821 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 D J & l l YAlCH 143.09 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240057 4831 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 D H FREEMAN, JR & C T FREEMAN 100.16 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240042 4850 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 M A & W A KRANZ SR TRUSTEES 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240046 4901 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 V G & P A BLONIGEN 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240040 4910 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 ANDREW ROCHELEAU 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240086 4911 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 JENNIFER BENTRIM 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240009 4920 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 MATTHEW F BAilEY 79.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240010 4950 DRAKE ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 N C JOHNSON & l l JOHNSON 79.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924310075 4960 DULUTH STREET GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 JlllENE M PICKETT 15.00 10 0.5 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924310076 4962 DULUTH STREET GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 JOHN l GORDON/HOllY M GORDON 15.00 10 0.5 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320024 3015 GlENDEN TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 l R & lAJOHNSON 284.64 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320023 3025 GlENDEN TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 WILLARD C NICHOLS 106.34 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320017 3030 GlENDEN TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 CHRIS D l FLlKKE SUBJ/l E 144.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320022 3035 GLEN DEN TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 MICHAEL AllEN & HEIDI BOLTON 100.38 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320018 3050 GlENDEN TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 MARY KAYE FOLEY 125.04 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320021 3055 GLEN DEN TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 P&Kl TAFFE 100.38 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320020 3065 GlENDEN TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 TERRANCE R MACDONALD ET Al 246.67 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
07029243200.19 3070 GLEN DEN TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 E RUTHERFORD & A MCCONNEll 228.80 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330025 5000 HAMPTON ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 BRIAN l PATTERSON 216.48 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330021 5005 HAMPTON ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 JOE & SARA S MciNTOSH 217.99 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330020 5025 HAMPTON ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 METROPOLITAN COUNCil 110.00 11 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330024 5050 HAMPTON ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 TROY A BURTON/HEIDI E BURTON 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330019 5105 HAMPTON ROAD GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 G N GEISER & K M GEISER 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330023 5110 HAMPTON ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LAURA E NEDVED 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320029 2900 LILAC DRIVE NORTH GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 B l & M V BUTTERFIELD 280.20 8,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320001 3100 LILAC DRIVE NORTH GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 VAllEY COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 720.00 12 0 $18,684.00 $18,684.00 $18,684.00
0702924230020 3370-4 LILAC DRIVE NORTH GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 TASK UNLIMITED lODGES 286.05 13,14 1 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00
0702924240018 4965 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 J & J ZORAWSKI 255.76 15 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2.200.00
0702924240100 5022 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 PAUL THOMAS ETAl 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240095 5042 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 SCOTT D MCMilLAN 223.84 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310104 5051 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 E C CROUCH & G ANNE ZUBICH 347.10 16 2 $4400.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00
0702924230047 5120 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 M E OPIOLA & K E OPIOLA 230.00 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230048 5140 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J M & H BICK 230.00 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230051 5220 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 GRAHAM M WOOD 211.00 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230052 5240 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 K & S FINICAL 100.00 1 $4400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230041 5300 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 C N YEAGER & C A YEAGER 102.81 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320035 5315 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARY ALICE LUTZ 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320036 5325 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 JOANNE l MACKEY 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230042 5330 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 H J BURKE & D D HANSON 98.00 17 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230043 5340 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 P M HAUTMAN & M l LOGUE 179.97 18 2 $4,400.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00
0702924230044 5360 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 DAVID K RALEY 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230045 5380 LOWRY TERRACE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 D K RALEY & S A MOORE 276.54 8 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340084 4725 MARIE LANE EAST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 C & R BROOKINS 65.66 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340078 4750 MARIE LANE EAST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 D J JONES & P M JONES 202.83 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340085 4755 MARIE LANE EAST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 G M WANZEK & P M WANZEK 129.34 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340077 4800 MARIE LANE EAST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 R OSCAR CIBUZAR ETAl 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340086 4801 MARIE LANE EAST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 J T SOUTHAM & M A SOUTHAM 120.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4400.00
0702924340076 4810 MARIE LANE EAST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 WILLIAM G HOFSTAD 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340087 4811 MARIE LANE EAST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 DORIS l SENSTAD TRUSTEE 120.00 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340075 4820 MARIE LANE EAST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 VIRGINIA DESMOND 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340074 4900 MARIE LANE EAST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 P D SIEWART & N A ROGNESS n07 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330027 5005 MARIE LANE WEST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 SUSAN MARIE VINGE 223.76 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330028 5055 MARIE LANE WEST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 J & K DE ZIEl 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330032 5100 MARIE LANE WEST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 T P HART ETAl 157.30 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330029 5125 MARIE LANE WEST GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 V E & N P ROONEY TRUSTEES 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330031 5150 MARIE LANE WEST GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KYLE SABOT 226.42 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240047 4800 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GENEVIEVE G lEVERONE TRUSTEE 105.60 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240063 4805 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J l MillER & A l K MillER 256.19 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210057 4810 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 E R BARENBURG/B F BARENBURG 129.30 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210058 4820 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 STEVEN J MCHUGH 120.50 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
G;\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Mailing Usts 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\2008AssessmentRoll
Revised 05118/07
RES. LEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITY/STATEIZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
1802924240077 4825 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 K B HALVERSON & L A FENEIS 266.05 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210059 4840 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R W MARRS & R E MARRS TRTEES 116.57 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210064 4855 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G M SEITER & J A SEITER 226.05 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210060 4660 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GREG BORDON 100.70 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210061 4900 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JEROME N THORSON 100.00 1 $4 400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210062 4930 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G J VANHEEST & A E VANHEEST 97.10 1 $4,400.00 $4 400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210063 4940 MARKAY RIDGE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RICHARD EDMUND KORAB 97.10 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220166 5100 MINNAOUA DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S C HOLM ERIK C MANN SUBJ/LE 217.83 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220185 5101 MINNAOUA DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 F & F NAB ETA 109.08 19 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220187 5110 MINNAOUA DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 W R LOVE & P J NEIMAN 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220188 5120 MINNAOUA DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 N J LARSON & S M FRIDLEY 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924230020 5125 MINNAOUA DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KENNETH L HEDBERG 190.55 18 2 $4,400.00 $8,800.00 $8800.00
1802924220189 5126 MINNAOUA DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C J & S B CONDON 100.00 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
1802924230019 5129 MINNAOUA DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D & S BISTODEAU 199.77 18 2 $4400.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00
1802924220190 5130 MINNAOUA DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MICHAEL T DAY & SUSAN M DAY 139.89 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240008 2107 NOBLE AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J L SALlTROS & S J WARNER 240.28 1 0.5 $2200.00 $2,200.00 $2200.00
0702924340102 2841 NOBLE AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P A & P A RIKKE 240.64 1,42 0.5 $2,200.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $2,200.00
0702924310018 2901 NOBLE AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CLAUDIA J ARONSOHN 201.10 20,21,42 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924310073 4900 NORMANDY PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ERIC S CONZEMIUS 242.00 3 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924310074 4920 NORMANDY PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P J & C F LENAGH 75.00 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310114 4930 NORMANDY PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J K GIBSON & S L SAVAGE 73.91 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924310113 4940 NORMANDY PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ANN T SESSOMS ET AL 76.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310077 4944 NORMANDY PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ANTON W RIEMENSNIDER ET AL 102.94 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310078 4948 NORMANDY PLACE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CAROLYN S JOHNSON 316.43 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240068 2055 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROBERT J MARKS ETAL 148.45 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240067 2121 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PATRICIA F PENNINGTON 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240066 2135 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J J LINDHOLM & E E LINDHOLM 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240043 2136 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LOIS C SJOGREN 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240065 2143 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 TONY J MACDONALD 100.00 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240044 2148 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 A L MAJERUS & M B MCCARNEY 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240064 2157 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DAVID ELTON HOBERG 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240045 2160 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CHRISTINE E CARLSON 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240046 2200 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DELORES M SAVELKOUL 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340063 2700 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 K L & D K GRAVES 105.42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340082 2710 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 N 0 ADOGA & B U ADOGA 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340081 2750 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CHARLES M PETERSON 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340080 2770 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 B ESCOTT & S R SCOTT 100.00 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340079 2790 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOHN W ROWLEY ET AL 314.27 22 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924310019 2900 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PATRICK CHUNG 221.05 23,42 0.5 $2200.00 $2,200.00 $2 200.00
0702924310037 2901 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J A WORRE & P D WORRE 221.00 23,42 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2200.00
0702924240059 3270 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J R MATHES & K K CHEE 216.61 24 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
1802924240014 1960 ORDWAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 o D GROSSMAN & L M GROSSMAN 333.91 25 2 $4,400.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00
1802924240013 2000 ORDWAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SHARI R BRANDHOY 110.00 1 $4 ,400. 00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240012 2018 ORDWAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 EDITH MAROUERITE JACOBSON 125.18 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240011 2030 ORDWAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BRUCE G RAHMAN 110.00 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240069 2035 ORDWAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 F S BLAISDELUL R BLAISDELL 255.02 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
1802924240010 2050 ORDWAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RICHARD H PLANTZlILA SAXENA 110.07 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240009 2070 ORDWAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BRUCE A OLSON 110.39 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240042 2075 ORDWAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 B G SULLIVAN & D M SULLIVAN 225.00 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
1802924240041 2091 ORDWAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DONNA GODEJOHN 225.00 1 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
1802924240084 2107 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JEANNE K HARO 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240071 2110 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MATTHEW BERRY 100.00 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4400.00
1802924240083 2117 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PATRICK J O'ROURKE 100.27 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4400.00
1802924240072 2120 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S D HILLSON & K H HAUGAN 100.13 1 $4,400.00 $4 400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240082 2131 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G BUSH & M BUSH 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240073 2134 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 STEVEN G & WENDY L BAUER 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240081 2141 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 L R NELSON-MAYSON ET AL 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240074 2142 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G D LUND & S LUND 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240080 2151 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M A & M B WILLIAMS 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240075 2154 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 WARD GARMS 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
G:\PRQJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1 )\Mailing Usts 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1 \2008AssessmentRolI
Revised 05118/07
RES. LEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITY/STATElZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
1802924240079 2163 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J H STROBEL & N J STROBEL 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240076 2164 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J H LAWRENCE & J TIJO 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240078 2203 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M P KUNNICK & S M KUNNICK 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210007 2440 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R H MENDENHALL ETAL TRUSTEES 100.00 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210017 2445 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 IONEL COSTEA 104.52 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210008 2480 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DAVID M JACOBS 100.01 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210016 2485 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C E GRUNEWALD/M M GRUNEWALD 104.52 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210009 2500 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 B REMPEL & D REMPEL 100.35 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210015 2505 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KAREN L ANDERSON 100.09 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210010 2540 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SUSAN K RAIN 100.35 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210014 2545 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D A & R SCHWANDT 100.09 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210012 2580 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 TESFAYE H WOLDEMICHAEL ET AL 94.74 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210011 2582 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 281 10.00 26 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
1802924210013 2585 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J A ALMQUIST & B V ALMQUIST 101.78 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340091 2600 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 T & R HARRITY 100.55 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340069 2605 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G & T BARLOW 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340090 2620 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D A KUBALL & J S KUBALL 110.61 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340070 2625 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C W&J H BOLDT 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340089 2640 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 E C GLASS ETAL 120.67 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340071 2655 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LUCINDA J COMMERS 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340088 2670 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THE S W FRICK LIVING TRUST 214.72 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340072 2675 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THOMAS E & BERTIE L KRAFT 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340073 2695 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J W LOVITT & J L LOVITT 95.88 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310038 2900 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 B A SIEGFRIED & J A J SIEGFRIED 221.00 4,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310052 2901 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DEAN B VAN HORN ETAL 207.00 4,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310039 2912 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J J MCCAAN JR & D L MCCAAN 76.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924310051 2913 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BRIAN SCHAEFER 99.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924310040 2924 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ELWOOD H. LARSON ETAL 95.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310050 2925 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ELLEN D FOLEY 99.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310041 2936 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R WHALL & T L HALL 76.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400,00 $4,400.00
0702924310049 2937 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J A HAWKINSON ET AL 99.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310042 2940 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D E WRIGHT & K M WRIGHT 95.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310043 2942 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GRETEL M HERMANSON ETAL 76.00 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310044 2944 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DWAYNE B BEIDELMAN JR ETAL 95.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310048 2945 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 A N JONES & J S JONES 228.83 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310045 3000 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R S GULLICK & P J GULLICK 95.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310046 3016 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PAUL L YOUNG, ETAL 76.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310047 3026 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DAVID J/BARBARA L GAASEDELEN 216.11 27 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
1802924210020 2430 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RAYNARD P NYBERG JR 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210031 2445 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 T W CUMMINS & B H CUMMINS 105.44 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210021 2460 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 AMIR & ADMIRA DERANJIC 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210030 2475 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MATTHEW K KALLENBERG 105.44 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210022 2490 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 REM MINN COMMUNITY SERVICE INC 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210029 2495 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAN BUSHY & BRADY STORHAUG 100.06 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210023 2500 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P J MACDONALD TRUSTEE 100.35 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210028 2505 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D J lINNIHAN & J I lINNIHAN 100.99 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210024 2540 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JORGE ENRIQUE S FIGUEROA 100.35 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210027 2545 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 W G HAMERSTON ETAL 100.99 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210025 2580 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROBERT J MCGINTY 100.22 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210026 2585 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MELANY ALLISON BARTH 100.34 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340088 2600 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 VEVA ANN ARNOLD TRUSTEE 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340036 2605 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 T C & J M ROEHL 98.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400,00 $4,400.00
0702924340067 2620 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARK B HOORNBEEK ET AL 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340035 2625 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D L RICHOZ & K A COE-RICHOZ 98.00 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340088 2640 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BROCK A & TERESA R MATTER 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340034 2655 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ABDUL 0 MOHAMMADZADAH ET AL 98.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340065 2670 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARGARET R HUNEGS TRUSTEE 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340033 2675 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ARLENEIBERUS 98.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340064 2680 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 B J AHLBRECHT/K L AHLBRECHT 100.20 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340032 2685 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 IRA J HACKNER 95.84 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
G;\PROJECTS\2008.9 PMP (OB-1)\Mailing Lists 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\2008AssessmentRoll
Revised 05118/07
RES. LEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITYISTATElZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
0702924340063 2700 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PAUL PETERSON 100.53 1 " $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340031 2735 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CHRISTINE ANN MIELKE 105.72 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340030 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CHRISTINE ANN MIELKE 38.85 26 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
0702924340029 2745 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KIRSTEN M CARRIZALES ET AL 163.08 9 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340028 2755 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PAULINE ROSE SONIFER 108.94 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340027 2765 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R & B KRAMER 96.57 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340037 2770 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JUDITH G BONAR 280.74 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340026 2775 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 T H HANSEN & C A BARTH 211.30 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310063 2900 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C A CAHILL & C A CAHILL 179.40 4,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310108 2901 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROBERT D MADSEN ETAL 285.80 4 9,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310064 2912 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SUSAN R TOLLMAN 80.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320004 2915 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 EDWARD W ZINN 116.40 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310065 2924 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOHN H & CATHERINE A MAMER 88.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320003 2933 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LANCE C COMO 104.38 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310066 2936 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J W WILLIAMS & M A-WILLIAMS 80.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924310067 2940 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARK E & GRETCHEN W NOORDSY 220.70 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320002 2943 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 L H ANDERSON & C G ANDERSON 121.50 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310107 3001 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M T &S M MCILROY 112.54 1 $4,400.00 $4 400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310106 3015 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R & M GELDERT 98.33 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310068 3030 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D R KIVLAHAN & E B R KIVLAHAN 223.56 27 0.5 $2200.00 $2 200.00 $2,200.00
0702924310105 3035 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BRIAN S RUNMARK ETAL SUBJILE 273.65 27 0.5 $2 200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924310086 3100 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 VIVIAN C NELSON ET AL 342.79 27 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924310099 3101 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 SHERYL DIANNE MAlONE 236.85 27 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924310115 3124 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 K MUCHEMORE & C H CHAN 85.89 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310110 3125 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R A SHAFFER & M T SHAFFER 118.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924310116 3138 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 ANDREW J & DONNA TIRPAK 77.30 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310096 3139 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BRUCE J KITTILSON ET AL 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310117 3142 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R A & C J ANDERSON 80.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310095 3145 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D L STEPANEK & J M STEPANEK 259.74 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310118 3146 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 FRED A REITER 107.63 1 $4,400.00 $4 400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240077 3201 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAMES M & SONIA M CASEY 236.43 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240017 3250 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 K W ECKEL & P MECKEL 243.76 15 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924240078 3251 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 TRICIA L FLEMMER 9007 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240079 3260 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 KAREN L WATSON 90.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240074 3261 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J H BROWN & S L BROWN 90.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240080 3270 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M J NEIBLlNG ETAL 90.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240076 3271 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PETER F WUNSCH 90.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240075 3281 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P K O'ROURKE & S D O'ROURKE 117.00 1 $4,400,00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240082 3300 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 P E & M M JULIEN 200.03 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240087 3301 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 TARA S KRIEDERMACHER 237.05 3 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240089 3307 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J KACZMAREK & M I KACZMAREK 100.00 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240083 3312 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SANDRA DEE ERICKSON 91.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240088 3315 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GARY A HAUGlGLENDA M HAUG TR 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240084 3320 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D P DUFFY & N I DUFFY 220.02 3 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4 400.00
0702924240003 3345 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D M KEDDIE & M A KEDDIE 80.00 1 $4,400.00 $4 400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240011 3350 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOHN J OLINGER ETAL 204.76 3 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240002 3355 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 STEVE GAMACHE 98.72 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240001 3365 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KEITH RANDOLPH ANDERSON 255.67 28 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
1802924310005 1900 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PRICE N JONES & WIFE 228.20 29 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
1802924310003 1920 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 A L & S T FREEMAN 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4400.00
1802924320044 1931 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 L W SUSSMAN ETAL 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924230067 1941-3 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 TROY W SKELTON 150.00 30 1 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00
1802924230007 1951 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DARA L WALTER 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924230006 2001 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R PITSCH & M MURPHY-PITSCH 118.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924230004 2021 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DANA PERKINS 115.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924230003 2101 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G V & L M SPAULDING 95.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924230001 2115 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 P M GOOD & J A LEITH 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240055 2120 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J R RODRIGUEZ I J M RODRIGUEZ 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,40000 $4,400.00
1802924240056 2132 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DA& KC SMITH 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,40000 $4,400.00
1802924240057 2144 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J J LANDRY & T LLANDRY 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP {08~ 1 )\Mailing Lists 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1 \200BAssessmentRoJl
Revised 05/18/07
RES. LEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITY/STATElZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
1802924230061 2157 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R W SIMONS & L F SIMONS 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240058 2160 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 I R WESTRAY & VL WATSON 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240059 2200 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ANDREA JEAN VOLLMER 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924230060 2201 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J T & D S FITZSIMMONS 214.00 9 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240060 2224 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOSEPH J DASZKIEWlCZ 100.00 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220184 2225 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 H ADAMS & F SMILEY 236.33 3 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210067 2244 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 FELIX R NORMAN ET AL 140.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210068 2280 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 B P SZWED & L SZWED 99.50 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220183 2285 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SANDRA M JOHNSON 105.46 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220182 2355 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 H C DOUVIER & S P MOSER 110.43 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220181 2405 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G E & C A MALINOWSKI 100.20 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210034 2420 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GLORIA J OLSEN 100.69 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220180 2425 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R I GODFREY & J R GODFREY 100.41 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210035 2440 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROLFE A & KATHLEEN A WORDEN 102.28 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220179 2445 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J E JOHNSON & N N JOHNSON 100.86 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210036 2460 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S M ELIAS & T J SMITH 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220178 2465 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JON S & QUEEN W SWENSON 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210037 2480 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R ANDERSON & MANDERSON 100.35 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220177 2485 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M S BARTEL & S C BARTEL 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210038 2500 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THOMAS A MEUWlSSEN 101.52 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220176 2505 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 L 0 & J L TORKELSON 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210039 2540 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 VIRGINIA H BACKE 101.35 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220175 2545 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARK EDWARD PLOOSTER 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924210040 2580 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PHILIP WORTHINGTON & WIFE 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924220174 2585 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 W F TRUESDELL ET AL 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340019 2600 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BURNELL A HAMlIlN 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340020 2650 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 MATTHEW J HAIKER 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340021 2660 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LAZARO R ROBlES-ORDONES 99.44 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924330026 2665 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 A J KORMAN & J M KORMAN 98.04 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340022 2670 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M M SHADDUCK & D A MANKOWSKI 98.38 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340023 2680 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 AVIS M RITLAND 99.39 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340024 2700 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GARY R & JOANNE K GARDNER 112.22 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330033 2705 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 GERALD FIELDS ETAL 290.81 3 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924340025 2720 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 L J BELL & P D BELL 112.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330034 2725 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J A SHERMAN & B J SHERMAN 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330037 2740 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 o MARIE COLLINS TRUSTEE 116.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330035 2745 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAMES PAUL WALKNER 236.85 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330038 2750 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G M KNOBEN & D L KNOBEN 114.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330015 2775 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 AVIDIGM CAPITAL GROUP 206.84 31,32 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330003 2805 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 H L TRESTMAN ETAL 260.50 31 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330057 2885 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C M UPHAM & C L UPHAM 279.98 4,42 1 $4400.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $4,400.00
0702924320053 2905 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 WW&ABARBERG 287.45 4,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320006 2912 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 E V & D l BEBAUL T 109.10 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320051 2915 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ANNE M RADOllNSKI ET AL 104.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320007 2924 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 M BEAM & R BEAM I TRUSTEES 142.89 1 $4400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320049 2925 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAllEY MN 55422 E J HERSTEIN & K K CARLISLE 100.50 1 $4,400.00 $4 400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320048 2935 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 F AZMOUDEH & M AlIABADI 100.50 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320055 2936 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S B WALLACE & M M C WALLACE 136.24 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320010 2940 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 L G ANDERSON & E G ANDERSON 139.72 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924320057 2945 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R J SCHMIDT ET AL 70.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320039 2955 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R & C MARTENS 98.90 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320011 3000 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VAlLEY MN 55422 MARK & MONICA ROCZNIAK 98.31 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320040 3005 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D & T PETERS 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320012 3014 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MICHAEL J & VALERIE HERRING 96.69 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310109 3034 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RYAN GOULD 211.20 27 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924310100 3100 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 T F VOSSEN & J L VOSSEN 275.80 27 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924310101 3120 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THAI ANTHONY XIONG & PA YANG 115.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4400.00
0702924310111 3138 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S & E SIMIAN 115.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240094 3206 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DIANE WEBBER 75.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230046 3211 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 XAVIER G & MARL YS HARO 80.76 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1 )\Mailing Usts 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08.1\2008AssessmentRoll
Revised 05/18/07
RES. LEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITY/STA TElZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
0702924240093 3220 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LEAH A MOONEY TRUSTEE 80.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230055 3221 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROBERT S RUUD ETAL 92.10 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240097 3230 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 R C RINGLlEN ETAL 100,00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230058 3231 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DAN E CRAGG ET AL 107.70 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240096 3240 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RICHARD CARL HOBUS 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230022 3241 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DENIS PLASTER 89.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240098 3244 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J & J LIEN 81.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230021 3245 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CYNTHIA L MUNDAHL 75.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240099 3248 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J M HOUK & M L HOUK 207.15 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230039 3249 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 D WLORD & S E LORD 269.20 33 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240092 3300 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROGER L SUESS ETAL 189.00 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230029 3311 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SUSAN GAIL STEIN 269.20 33 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240091 3312 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SCOT R LARSON 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240090 3320 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LAVINA ANDERSON 104.51 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230028 3321 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOSEPH D TOMKO JR ETAL 131.20 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230068 3329 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 E A NETZINGER ETAL 93.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240004 3330 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GA&MWAHL 80.00 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230069 3333 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROGER A SILJANDER 100.12 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240005 3338 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S M PETERSEN & K A STREIT 100.40 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230002 3345 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 S J BE SERES & J M BESERES 101.17 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240006 3348 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C R BLAKELEY & S B BLAKELEY 217.66 28 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924230001 3355 REGENT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 E K WNOBLE & J G WNOBLE 101.95 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330018 2600 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROBERT J VOLLEN 216.42 3 1 $4,400.00 $4 400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330022 2660 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 NATHAN GOLDSBY & ALBERT J GUPTON SR 216.42 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330030 2670 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 IRIT 0 VINITSKY 214.59 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330009 2675 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOSE S BATTIG & V C SADDI 83.99 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330010 2685 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RACHEL L ROBINSON TRUSTEE 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330011 2725 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LYNN M ELMER & JULIE E TESSIER 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330012 2735 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ABDELlLAH BOUTHIM 99.72 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4400.00
0702924330036 2740 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROXANNE S OSWALD 160.76 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330013 2745 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JEFFREY T & CARHOLEEN M VICK 80.91 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330014 2755 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DIEYNABA N'DONGO 230.87 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330002 2800 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARGARET B PILE TRUSTEE 269.00 31 1 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924330048 2805 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 EDWARD F JEFFREYS 162.99 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924330058 2820 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RICHARD E & CAROL A CONRAD TRUST 279.50 4,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320052 2900 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MAX B GOLDBERG ETAL 245.04 4,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320025 2905 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PHILIP & MARY SMITH 275.85 4,42 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320050 2910 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SAMIR A & DINA A BOTROS 102.27 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320016 3005 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DUANE A & JANICE A JOHNSON 269.83 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320056 3020 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RONALD J SCHMIDT ETAL 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320046 3030 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DONALD B ANDERSON ETAL 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320045 3050 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MICHAEL L & RITA A ANDESON 100.30 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320015 3055 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RONALD H STOVER 169.82 9 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230049 3210 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SCOTT D BAUER & LISA M BOHL 80.73 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230050 3211 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THEODORE N MATSUYAMA ETAL 80.72 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230056 3220 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 STATE OF MINNESOTA 89.10 34 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230054 3221 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARK A HENSINKVEID & LORI M OPSAL 89.10 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230059 3231 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARTIN D & MARL YS J COUGHLIN TRUSTEES 74.25 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4400.00
0702924230057 3232 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BRITT RUSSMAN 74.75 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230023 3240 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DEBRA WACHMAN 89.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230072 3241 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 TIMOTHY D VANTASSEL 81.96 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924230024 3244 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CRAIG L CHING 74.94 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230025 3245 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOAN M CARLSON ETAL 81.96 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230037 3249 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THE BARNES TRUST 256.49 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230033 3301 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 HERBERT G PURDY ETAL 243.10 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230027 3320 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CRAIG A HESS 131.16 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230032 3321 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAN W & KIMBERLY A VAN OPPEN 131.15 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230003 3328 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MICHAEL R & KIMBERLEE K JANSSEN 87.62 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230013 3335-7 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DAVID J & MICHELLE M ROMANS 228.31 9 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230004 3336 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOHN A & LAUREL L JOHNSTON 90.00 1 $4400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1 )\Mailing Lists 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\200SAssessmentRoll
Revised 05118107
RES. LEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITY/STA TEIZlP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
0702924230005 3344 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARK & B HOCHHAUSER 85.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230006 3352 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DARLE L BLADE ETAL 88.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230014 3355 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GARY L SMITH ETAL 131.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230007 3360 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KRISTEN SOBANJA & J EFFLER 83.00 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230015 3365 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BENJAMIN J & LEE A SCHULZ 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230008 3368 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SCOTT A & 0 K WARD 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230009 3376 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CHARLES 0 & J MELANIE CHRISTIANSON ETAL 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230010 3384 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 FRED E & ALICE J HAHN 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230017 3385 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROBERT HAWES 241.97 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230011 3390 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PATRICK & KATHERINE BYRON 110.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924230012 3398 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 VALERIY KOLESNIKOV 110.00 8 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240015 4835 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MICHAEL G DIERKS 235.80 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,4oo.0Q
1802924240024 4840 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROBERT L & J V LEWIS 275.61 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240016 4875 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SHAWN T SWEENEY 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240025 .4880 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LORRAINE M MURPHY 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240026 4920 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 o SAYARAJ & D SAYARJ 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240017 4925 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GERALD J & KATHERINE CANFIELD 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240018 4935 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 T W SKELTON & A C SKELTON 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240028 4936 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARY I JOHNSON TRUSTEE 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240031 4944 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 REED & SHEILA GILKEY 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240019 4945 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 RICHARD E & MARJORIE OLSON 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240020 4955 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CHAS R STONE ETAL 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240032 4960 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KEITH A & MIRIAM L QUEENSEN 100.05 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240021 4975 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 FRANK W AINSWORTH ETAL 250.05 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240034 4980 SORELL AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAYHCAHOW 257.05 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924310072 4901 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JILL K TROUTMAN & JANISE L HOLTER 258.40 27 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2200.00
0702924320041 5205 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAMES L & NANCY E HUSNIK 280.78 3 1 $4.400.00 $4,400.00 $4 400.00
0702924320042 5225 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 LON A WRIGHT SR 120.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320043 5245 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 EUGENE C & KIM BUELL 135.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320044 5255 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THOMAS A & TARA L DORSETT 272.62 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320038 5310 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CECELLlA R MILLER 102.33 1 $4,400.00 $4400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320037 5320 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 SCOTT M & JENNIFER M SONDRALL 106.22 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320014 5325 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 J M STOLDORF & K L MAURSTAD 321.98 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924320013 5340 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 VALLEY COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 215.47 35 0 $13,419.47 $13,419.47 $13,419.47
0702924320034 5350 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 VALLEY COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 388.62 36 0 $19,220.85 $19,220.85 $19,220.85
0702924320033 5385 TRITON DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KARl ZAKARIASEN ETAL 303.00 37 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240023 4835 WESTBEND ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DANIEL J WILLIAMS 308.57 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240070 4840 WESTBEND ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DAVID J RAUSCH 282.90 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240022 4875 WESTBEND ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MICHAEL J DRAKE 140.07 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240085 4920 WESTBEND ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JUDITH M STARK ETAL 235.40 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240027 4925 WESTBEND ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C A GELDERT & AMY A WINK 100.06 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240029 4935 WESTBEND ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARY I JOHNSON 102.18 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240030 4945 WESTBEND ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ROGER W & NANCY L BERGNER 108.18 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240033 4955 WESTBEND ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 HARRY S CRUMP 112.69 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924230002 5000 WESTBEND ROAD GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DANA J & JUDITH E BARAT 279.50 43 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
1802924240086 2100 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ANTHONY B & JUDITH W SHINK 264.38 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240054 2107 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 C L & L M WIESE TRUSTEES 415.70 38 2 $4,400.00 $8,800.00 $8.800.00
1802924240087 2110 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PENELOPE M SWEITZER 101.88 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240053 2117 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DEBRA L & JOSEPH A GARTNER 10200 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240088 2120 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEYMN 55422 ERIK E ANDERSON 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240052 2131 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 BRADLEY A LOBASH 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240089 2132 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 TROY A CLEMENS 100.17 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240051 2143 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 STEVEN S SCHREURS & M K SIEGLER 100.20 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240090 2144 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 E DAVID JOHNSON 100.18 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240050 2157 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GARY J & DANA L ELFERING 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240091 2160 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KAREN A SWEET 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240092 2200 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 G S & LAURA G MONCRIEFF 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240049 2201 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 HOWARD 0 & MARY A CHRISTENSON ETAL 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
1802924240048 2223 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GORDON J TVEDT & BETTY KAMPEN 100.00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400 00
1802924210065 2224 WINDSOR WAY GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GLEN A FULLER ETAL 282.47 39 2 $4,400.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (OB-1)\Mailing Lists 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\2008AssessmentRolI
Revised 05/18107
RES. LEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREeT CITY/STATeIZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
0702924240054 4700 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ERIC M & CYNTHIA C WESTBY 281.74 40 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924240062 4701 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 VERNA T JOHNSON 241.09 41 0.5 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
0702924240060 4721 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JAMES W MELICHAR & K MCCORMICK 100.00 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240053 4740 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JOHN P ARMSTRONG & BARBARA M MCAFEE 100.27 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240052 4750 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MARY C & SCHUYER WOODALL 100.27 1 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240050 4806 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 EARL WARD 80.00 1 $4 400.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240067 4807 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KEVIN M MONOGUE & J L LEONHART 274.85 24 0.5 $2,200,00 $2 200,00 $2,200,00
0702924240049 4812 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 CAROLYN A RASK 120,54 1 $4,400,00 $4,400,00 $4,400,00
0702924240066 4831 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 HENRY G PARSONS, JR 100,00 1 $4,400,00 $4,400,00 $4,400.00
0702924240064 4845 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THOMAS E & MARY F RYAN 100,00 1 $4,400,00 $4,400,00 $4,400,00
0702924240056 4850 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 TODD H & BETH T LUTGEN 100,54 1 $4,400,00 $4,400,00 $4,400.00
0702924240058 4910 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 THOMAS MURRAY JONES 100,00 1 $4,400,00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00
0702924240065 4911 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 WILLIAM H ANDREL 100,00 1 $4,400.00 $4,400,00 $4,400,00
0702924240085 4920 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 HEATHER M SHAW & MICHAEL J NEIS 100,00 1 $4,400,00 $4,400,00 $4,400.00
0702924240081 4927 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MICHAEL R O'ROURKE 265,50 3 1 $4,400,00 $4,400,00 $4,400,00
0702924240073 5007 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 ANTHONY G & LOUISE R HALEK 207,39 3 1 $4,400,00 $4,400,00 $4,400,00
0702924230040 5139 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 WILLIAM A & MARY J KOPPES 231,16 3 1 $4,400,00 $4,400.00 $4,400,00
0702924230030 5150 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 GREGORY W & KAREN 0 SCHINDLER 231,16 3 1 $4,400.00 $4,400,00 $4 400,00
0702924230038 5225-7 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 TIMOTHY J BERGQUEST 197,32 30 1 $8,800,00 $8,800.00 $8,800,00
0702924230034 5240 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 KEVIN J BOEDIGHEIMER 221,21 9 1 $4,400.00 $4,400,00 $4,400,00
0702924230031 5300 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 PAUL E BUKOSKEY 165,10 30 1 $8,800,00 $8,800.00 $8 800,00
0702924230036 5301-3 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 JEANETTE A MSERUD 159.58 30 1 $8,800,00 $8,800,00 $8,800.00
0702924230018 5315 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 MATTHEW T & J M DONAGHUE 104.21 1 $4 400,00 $4,400,00 $4,400.00
0702924230016 5330 33RD AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DENNIS M & GLORIA L FRISKE 308,68 16 0 $23113,96 $23,113,96 $23,113.96
0702924240007 5001 34TH AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 DAVID R FEDYK ET AL 262,67 28 0.5 $2,200,00 $2,200,00 $2,200.00
0702924330001 DAWNVIEW TERRACE Briarwood Bird Sanctuary CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 788.16 0 $49,086,60 $49,086,60 $49,066.60
0702924330016 5115 DAWNVIEW TERRACE Vacant Land CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 100.00 0 $6228,00 $6,228,00 $6,228.00
1802924210053 REGENT AVENUE NORTH Outlot 1 Dawn Acres 2nd CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 96.10 0 $5,985,11 $5,985,11 $5,985.11
1802924230005 2021 REGENT AVENUE NORTH Vacant Land CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 310.10 0 $19,313.03 $19,313,03 $19,313,03
1802924320045 1856 TOLEDO AVENUE NORTH Scheid Park CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 127,50 0 $7,940.70 $7,940,70 $7,940,70
1802924240035 4981 WESTBEND ROAD Vacant Land CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 334,79 0 $20,850.72 $20,850,72 $20 850.72
0702924320054 5300 TRITON DRIVE Geartv Park CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 1574,15 0 $98,038. 06 $98,038,06 $98 038.06
0702924330006 2605 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH Vacant Land CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 100,00 0 $6,228,00 $6 228,00 $6,228,00
0702924330007 2655 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH Vacant Land CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 100.00 0 $6,228.00 $6,228,00 $6,228.00
0702924330006 2665 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH Vacant Land CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 100,00 0 $6,228,00 $6,228,00 $6 228. 00
0702924230066 3300 LILAC DRIVE NORTH Vacant Land CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 95,89 0 $5,972.03 $5,972.03 $5,972.03
TOTALS $2,693,917.02 $0.00 $1,339,634.97 $1,389,482.04 $2,729,117.02
G;\PROJECTS\2008.9 PMP (08-1 )\Mailing Lists 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08--1 \2008AssessmentR.o"
Revised 05118107
RES. lEVIED ASSESSMENTS 2008 2009 TOTAL
PID HOUSE NO STREET CITY/STATElZIP PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS Non-MSAS MSAS TOTALS TOTALS ASSMTS.
NOTES:
1 Comer lot on local street and State Aid street, local street will be reconstructed, State Aid street was assessed $300 0.5 Units in 94 S110, assess 112 residential unit assessment.
2 Comer lot on local street and State Aid street, local street will be reconstructed, assess at residential front foot rate (@ $62.281FF .
3 Comer lot on 2 local streets, both streets will be reconstructed, assess 1 full residential untt assessment.
4 Comer lot on a Iocat street and a State Aid street, both streets will be reconstructed, assess 112 local residential unit and 1/2 State Aid assessment.
5 Oversized comer lot on a local street and a State Aid street both streets will be reconstructed, lot is subdividable into 2 lots, assess 1/:2 local residential untt & 112 untt State Aid assessment, defer 1 full unit State Aid assessment.
6 Comer lot on State Aid street and State frontace road, State Aid street will be reconstructed, assess 1 full untt State Aid assessment.
7 Driveway access off Dawnview & Scott 1 full residential unit assessment.
8 Comer lot on local street and State frontage road, local street will be reconstructed, assess 1 full residential unit assessment.
9 Oversized lot on local street, street will be reconstructed, iot is not subdividable, assess 1 full residential unit assessment.
10 Condominium with frontace on a local street and a County Road, local street will be reconslr1.Jcted, assess 112 Double Buncalow rate assessment.
11 Property Owner Address - Family Affordable Housino Prooram, 390 Robert St. N., St. Paul, MN, 55101
12 Comer lot on local street and State Frontage Road, local street will be reconstructed assess at residential front foot rate (@l $62.28/FF).
13 Residential Double untt wtth frontace on local street and State Frontace Rd., local street will be reconstructed, lot is subdividable into 2 lots,
assess one-haW double bunaalow unit and defer one haW untt..
14 Property Owner Address: 2419 Nicollet Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55404.
15 Comer lot on 2 local streets, one street was assessed $1,000 (0.5 Units) in 98 511, assess 112 residential unit assessment.
16 Residential triolex unit on 2 local streets both streets will be reconstructed, lot is subdividable into 2 lots, assess at mulliole dwellino local front foot rate (@ $74.88/FFl.
17 Property owner address: P.O. Box 1056, Yorba Linda, CA, 92885.
18 Oversized lot on local street, street will be reconstructed, lot is subdividable into 2 lots. Defer 1 full residential unit and assess 1 full residential untt.
19 Lot has frontage on 2 local streets, both streets will be reconstructed, assess 1 full residential unit assessment.
20 Comer lot on 2 State Aid Roads, one State Aid road will be reconstructed, the other State Aid road was assessed $1,000 0.5 Unit in 97 5117, assess 1/2 unit at State Aid rate.
21 Property Owner Address: 4715 Culver Road, Golden ValleY, MN 55422.
22 Corner lot on 2 local streets and a State Aid street, both local streets will be reconstructed, State Aid streets was reconstructed in 94 5110 (No assessment), assess 1 full residential unit.
23 Comer lot on local street and State Aid street, local street was assesSed $1,000 0.5 Units} in 97 51 2, assess 1/2 State Aid rate.
24 Comer lot on :2 local streets, one street was assessed $1,000 CO.5 Units in 97 51 2, assess 112 residential unit assessment.
25 Oversized corner lot on a local street and a County Road, local street will be reconstructed, lot is subdividable into 2 lots defer 1 full residential untt and assess 1 full residential untt.
26 Unbuildable lot, no assessment.
27 Comer lot on 2 local streets, one street was assessed $1,000 CO.5 Untts in 98 512, assess 1/2 residential untt assessment.
28 Comer lot on 2 local streets, one street was assessed $1,200 (0.5 Units in 01 511, assess 1/2 residential unit assessment.
29 Comer lot on local street and County Road, local street will be reconstructed, assess 1 full residential untt assessment.
30 Residential Double unit, lot is not subdividable, assess 1 full Double Bungalow rate.
31 Corner lot on 2 local streets, one street will be reconstructed, the other street is undeveloped assess 1 full unit residential assessment.
32 Property Owner Address: - P.O. Box 837, Lake Elmo, MN 55042
33 Oversized comer lot on 2 local streets, both streets will be reconstructed, lot is not subdividable, 1 full residential unit assessment.
34 Property Owner Address: - MSOCS/DHS, 444 Lafayette Rd. N. St. Paul, MN 55155
35 Lot with frontaoe on 2 local streets both streets will be reconstructed, assess @ residential front foot rate $62.28/FF
36 Lot with frontaoe on local street and State Frontace Road, local street will be reconstructed, assess @ residential front foot rate $62.28/FFl
37 Oversized comer lot on local street and State Frontace Road, local street will be reconstructed, lot is subdividable into 2 lots, defer 1 full residential untt and assess 1 full residential unit.
38 Oversized comer lot on 3 local streets, all local streets will be reconstructed, lot is subdividable into 2 lots, defer 1 full residential unit and assess 1 full residential untt.
39 Oversized comer lot on 2 Iocat streets, both streets will be reconstructed lot is subdividable into 2 lots, deferr 1 full residential unit and assess 1 full residential unit.
40 Oversized corner lot on local street and State Aid street, local street will be reconstructed, lot is not subdividable, State Aid street was assessed $400 0.5 units State Aid rate in 2005 PMP 05-1, assess 1/2 res. unit assessment.
41 Comer lot on local street and State Aid street, local street will be reconstructed, State Aid street was assessed $400 0.5 units in 2005 PMP 05-01, assess 112 unit residential
42) Per City Council direction, no State Aid assessment rates for Culver Road, All assessments are based upon current local unit assessment.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Mailing Usts 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\2008AssessmentRolI
Revised 05/18/07
PID
HOUSE NO
CITY/STATElZIP
TOTAL
ASSMTS.
STREET
43) Comer lot Regent and Westbend, Westbend previously assessed, asses one ha~ unit for Regent Avenue.
G;\PROJECTS\2008.9 PMP (08-1 )\Mailing Lists 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\200BAssessmentRolI
Revised 05/18/07
PROPERTY OWNERS
RES.
FRONTAGE NOTES UNITS
LEVIED ASSESSMENTS
Non-MSAS MSAS
2008
TOTALS
2009
TOTALS
Appendix A
Summary of Residents C()mments
2008 - 2009 Pavement Management Program
l!! " c ~
c: "
N '" ;;
" " &! 0
Address Street 3 " Comments
" ... ...
c: c: ~ 5!
~ ~ :!
;;
!~ ii1) Please protect evergreens (spruce trees) on 33rd with snow fencing - as per AI Lundstrom - Thanks! - 2.
i33rd AVE NORTH II iiOur preference in being phased in is for you to begin the work with our end of the project - Thank you!-
4700 H x X iiPlease for Jeannine Clancy return ourt $200 fee for III inspection - we had been told we had to pay and
.1 iihave had the inspection, We susequenlly learned we only had to pay if we were selling the house and not
II
;, iiiust as Dart of the stree work. - Thank vou.
4701 ,33rd AVE NORTH ii H
4721 i 33rd AVE NORTH
Ii I Jeff Oliver has agreed to replace my existing retaining wall with a fall timber retaining wall running from the
4740 i33rd AVE NORTH li X X
"drivewaveast. Thank vou! John
4750 i33rdAVE NORTH H .,
n
4806 i 33rd AVE NORTH H d
"
4807 i 33rd AVE NORTH H jj
4812 i 33rd AVE NORTH II II
4831 i33rdAVE NORTH ':
4845 i 33rd AVE NORTH l] 11
li
4850 i 33rd AVE NORTH oi I:
H
4910 i33rd AVE NORTH ii
,I 118 It wide sidewalk along Regent Ave is excessive and wasteful of public monies. Stormwater flows from
II
4911 i 33rd AVE NORTH X X Isuch a surface should be reduce. I Public works employees are entenng confined spaces (hand dug holes)
lito do sewer lateral inspection without following OSHA Standards. PW director told me to report the
!lproblems to MN OSHA. II have a mature elm tree in my yard that must be protected from root damage
4920 i 33rd AVE NORTH r' X ,i
4927 i 33rd AVE NORTH H
'i ilWe would really like to save our trees (8.5 It from curb). We put Christmas lights on them every year and
u
, Hthey help keep our dog from always having people who walk their dogs coming up to the fence. Plus our
l,
5007 i 33td AVE NORTH Ii ilneighbors like the look and we enjoy them also. The bushes hopefully are small enough to work with - they
l' ilare 6 feet in. Thank you - we really would like to keep our fine trees. We also know the road is in need of
;, iirepair. We will take out a loan in lieu of putting it on our taxes. 30% interest is very high. This tells me the
iiciIY would like thev monev in a lumD sum. Tonv Halek :1
5139 i 33rd AVE NORTH n
5150 i 33rd AVE NORTH l!
5240 '33rd AVE NORTH
III am concerned about the cums and gutters. I think by raising the level of the runoff from my front yard will
iihurt the lawn - It already gets flooded in the spring from the constant melting and re-freezinf of snow and
5300 . 33rd AVE NORTH li X lirain (I think the street level is already higher than my yard) - I am also concerned about the leve ofthe
, ilstreet compared to the driveway - I have 2 garages adn I will be lower than the street level (I think) please
'< '!take this into consideration.
5315 i 33rd AVE NORTH 11
5330 ,33rd AVE NORTH ;i
5225-7 33rd AVE NORTH n ,!
5301-3 33td AVE NORTH n
5001 i34thAVE NORTH
4700 BASSETT CREEK DR H
4735 ! BASSETT CREEK DR 'i X ttn Steve Hoae - 952 404 2496
4740 1 BASSETT CREEK DR I
4780 iBASSETT CREEK DR "
.,
4800 1 BASSETT CREEK DR l! 1
4840 iBASSETT CREEK DR Ii X
4865 i BASSETT CREEK DR X I X
4880 1 BASSETT CREEK DR l! I
4895 i BASSETT CREEK DR
4900 iBASSETT CREEK DR ii X
4905 i BASSETT CREEK DR n
11 1) Concerned about the quality of water that runs into Bassett Creek. 2) What about storm sewers -
4925 BASSETT CREEK DR H X X t~metirnes when it rains hard, water backs up and forms a lake in the street. 3) The force of the water
H om the culvert into Bassett Creek is causing the bank to erode on the opposite side. Will there be repair
~, r that? 41 What about the culvert from the street to the creek, will that be checked for leaks?
4950 'BASSETT CREEK DR "
;j
4975 'BASSETT CREEK DR li X , We have a bush and spruce within 10 feet.
,;
5000 'BASSETT CREEK DR " ,
"
5005 BASSETT CREEK DR H
11 1. I am interested in having a stop sign on Bassett Creek Or at Regent due to heavy traffic on Bassett
,;
li Creek in the 8-10 AM and 4-6 PM hour; the blind spot on Regent just south of this intersection due to the
li hill at that location; the fact that this intersection carries significant traffic from the preschool at Bassett
i ....reek & Noble; the safety needs of school children who stand at this intersection waiting for the school
i
'" bus; and accidents we have observed ( as well as property damage to our lawn and our neighbors'). A
5050 'BASSETT CREEK DR '1 X
[] very serious accident is bound to occur if this precaution is not taken. 2. My husband and I would both like
li
li ) see a crosswalk at the intersection of Regent and Duluth in order to promote accessibility to Scheid
ii ark, along with removal of the pedestrian bridge, which is an eyesore in this area since it is not
n oaintained and is rusted (as are the unattractive chain link fences on both sides of the street, which also
" ut off park access in addition to beina an aesthetic deficit for the arealstreetscapel.
: 11:1~:rea would be redesigned with beautification in mind, along with promoting neighborhoods that are
n able and healthy; more children - especially those in strollers (i.e. cannot use the bridge) and elderly
,;
i will be able to move safelv throuah the neiahborhood if these needs are addressed.
5055 BASSETT CREEK DR " X
n
BENCHMARK TRAIL, H We will pay the city, when you bill for 2107 Windsor Way - home, so it will not be put on taxes. Interested
951 H n determining if water and sewer services have been extended far enough to lot to avoid street impacts if
BELTON TX 76513 I! ot is divided. Interested in filling low spot in lot to provide drainage to street.
2900 CHEROKEE PL ii X - larae trees, 1 -Iona hedae want to keep. . no sidewalk needed.
2901 CHEROKEE PL ii
2912 CHEROKEE PL H i
2913 CHEROKEE PL iI i
2924 CHEROKEE PL ,.
,
2925 CHEROKEE PL ii Ii
2936 CHEROKEE PL 11 X X ,.
"
J!l " c ~
c .. ~
N '" "5
" i ~ u
Address Street -ll " ... ... Comments
c c ~ 1i1i
~ ~ i!: i!:
2937 CHEROKEE PL
2940 CHEROKEE PL X
2941 CHEROKEE PL
To the payment management program participants: I was filling out the enclosed forms and thought how
wonderful it would be if the five questions covered all the intricacies of this project. This morning I walked
~:n Culver Road and thought of all the beautiful trees that would be ripped down; all the decorative
dscaping proud homeowners have put on their property to make it look like someone cared about the
>roperty. It is unfortunate that the City does not feel that way about Culver Road and the taxpayers who
4715 CULVER RD oot a lot of the bills. When I first read the information, I figured there would be a little more thought put into
Jestroying a road before going ahead. A three-hour meeting hardly could cover anything important that
nust be addressed. Culver Road goes no place and the chances of it ever going someplace are quite
emote. With the creek on the east side and Highway 100 on the west, why would a City spend so much
:ime, money, effort and paper on something that is, at the most, one mile long.
seems very suspect that there is not an underlying motive. I am against this (I hate to use
improvement" as it is exactly the opposite) program as if there is money available to widen a road that
oes not need widening, perhaps the City could see if there is money available for something that would
enefit the Culver Road residents -like street lighting. I am extremely disappointed in the elected official of
olden Valley that they would even consider this flagrant destruction of a neighborhood when there are so
nany streets in other parts of Golden Valley that need the attention. Sincerely, Claudia Aronsohn.
~y first concem is safety. Cars travel very fast on Culver now. If the street is widened they will accelerate
eir speed. Culver Road will become a Regent or Noble Avenue. I have a 10-year-old son who plays in
e front yard/driveway all the time as do his friends. I am very concemed that widening the street will
crease traffic and speed. My second concem is the sidewalk. A sidewalk will damage the aesthetic
4747 CULVER RD X X quality of Culver Road. When I bought my home 16+ years ago I bought in August. The grass and the
ow of the property were stunning. Each lawn flows to the next, and the mature trees gave it charm and
lass. (Something new developments don't have). This was a very big factor in my decision because I
idn't like some features inside the house. The actual property helped me decide to buy. Dissecting the
'ront lawn for a sidewalk will remove that characteristic from our beautiful neighborhood. I have lived in the
ouse for 16 vears. There is no need that I have observed for a sidewalk on Culver Road.
oot traffic on the road is minimal on any given day. There are less than 5 people each night walking,
here is several that bike. On weekends there are approximately lOa day. The sidewalk on Culver is
Jesirable to the City but the residences (majority) are opposed. I am concemed and realize that my
>roperty value will drop. You will remove my majestic elm in the front yard, one that graces my property
nd provides shade to my home and yard. This tree is over 50 years old. When I came to the open house
representative stated we don't know what side of the street yet, but we have some very conservative
Ids on the sidewalk committee that take removing trees very seriously. My home will not have the same
urb appeal that it does now with a side sidewalk and a retaining wall. I do not have to worry now of the
bility of someone slipping on my sidewalk and suing me. A sidewalk will encourage people to drive
ter. A sidewalk will dissect the beautiful flowin~ landscape. It will make it look like Noble. Have vou
o longer has the subur1>an appearance due to the blazing white sidewalk (which isn't constant in its
earance with altemating boulevards). In Summary: SAFETY: Increased speed caused from widened
ception that people are safe on sidewalk to speed by. Increased traffic. Increased liability to residents.
ED: There is no justifiable need for sidewalk. The residents do not want a sidewalk. Use the money for
nething residents really need or want. Property Values: Will drop due to the encroachment of property
's by a wider street and sidewalk. Sense of privacy will be lost. Aesthetically unpleasing. Why make it
k like a city? Increased City costs: This will increase the others cost to maintain the sidewalk. Why
uld a decision be made to do this when there is no benefit to the City to do this? Deforestation: There
many fine trees that will be removed for the sidewalk. In this time of heightened awareness, you
uld rethink this. Kathleen M Burt 6/23/07
4801 CULVER RD X X j X .ioht pole and driftwood not sure if it'S within 10 feet
4815 CULVER RD X I X . . See additional text box at end of document. . .
4827 CULVER RD I ,
4901 CULVER RD X X i X
rom Mr. Christensen: My concerns are as follows: 1. appearance - Our neighborhood will change from
leighborhood to city (cold, hard, ugly). 2. safety - In the 60 years since our house was built there have
>een NO pedestrian/auto accidents!! 3. drainage - There have been no drainage problems through the
. City streets with cur1>s have frequent clogged drains with pooling of water. Statistics show this to be
4907 CULVER RD X 4. Expense - The cost to the property owners will be a tremendous burden forced upon us. The
epairs to Culver Road since its first being paved have been minimal with minor patching and once being
esurfaced. How many city streets have survived 60 yealS with so little maintenance and expense? 5.
ncreased traffic and crime. 6. Abuse of power. This is our neighborhood. A decision of this magnitude
hould be determined bv the people who live on the own property on Culver Road and the immediate
rom Mrs. Christensen: I bought a home in woodland Park in 1948. It was one of 100 homes project.
here were farms all around us. Golden Valley has grown to become a city. I love Golden Valley! But
~xnes have risen so high I can barely affOrd to live here. Taxes keep rising, and retired income stays the
me. I have lived on Culver Rd for 59 years. It hasn't had an accident all these yealS as it is safe to walk
.n Culver Rd. We do not need cur1>s or sidewalks in the 59 years. Why start now. It costs too much.
)on't drive me out of GV with vour hiah taxes please!!!! Verv sincerelv, Deloris A Christensen
4915 CULVER RD
4927 CULVER RD X
Ne were not available to attend the open house, but we are not supporting any plan to Culver that would
equire the loss of green space. Widening the road, adding a boulevard, and adding a sidewalk is not an
4937 CULVER RD X ~:rovement to the neighborhood or city in our opinion. We have not seen any details from the city that
mmunicate the true impact of any proposed project. It is imperative that they city listen to the feedback
the citizens before anv actions are taken.
'letaining walls on both sides of driveway and end 5 ft from street. Walls are in poor condition and we hope
o replace with this project. Tree roots in sanitary sewer have caused problems in past. We now clean out
>nce every 2 years and that controls problem. Large elm tree is 4 ft from street, will it be cut down?
4947 CULVER RD X X Sidewalk recommendation for Culver Rd came as complete surprise and we have many concerns: loss of
rees and shrubs, significant reduction of front yard, special assessment, and need based on Culver Rd
~:~;~. Our daughters walk on Culver to Noble Elementary School daily. I walk to NOble daily to catch
tro Transit bus. We have not had safety concerns.
5001 CULVER RD
5015 CULVER RD
:! " " ~
..
~ .. >
N 1 :;
" " 0
Address Street -3 -t: .. .. Comments
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ;:: ;:
,I am not in support of this project and am concerned regarding the process utilized to pursue this proposed
:CULVER RD !I X program. We have lived in the neighborhood for 16 years and are unaware of a large number of residents
5027 II X ing a sidewalk for Culver Road. I have recently discussed this issue with many of my neighbors and
[1 hat I have met with) have the same concems. I look forward to discussing this matter in the future.
really enjoy Golden Valley and would be very upset if you decide to put a sidewalk on our quiet street.
Noble and Regent a much busier roads this is certainly what our road would become. We don't want
5037 :CULVER RD X e on that type of road. We would never live on Noble or Regent for that reason. We also don't want a
cause people will be waling right in our front yard 10 It away from our door. It would be very
cling to our three small children to have people walking that close to our house not to mention loud
talking and dogs barking. Thank you!
5038 ICULVER RD
We are very opposed to a sidewalk and street widening project on our street. We are in the center of this
5047 ,CULVER RD X X X neighborhood and feel that not only is this un-necessary but it would ruin the look of the street and curb
::~al of our home. There is simply NO NEED for a sidewalk on Culver Road, Please stop the plans and
.Iv do the road at the same width and without disturbing our homes. Thank vou!
5305 iCULVER RD X
am among the vast majority in my neighborhood - specifically Culver Road - who are NOT IN FAVOR of
5320 iCULVER RD X laving a sidewalk installed on our street. Curbs-yes, sidewalk-no. It will decrease the green space we all
ove in our neiahborhood and there just isn't enough foot traffic to support the need! Luana Ball
5325 'CULVER RD x X Ne request protection fence around clump of mugu pine and spruce located next to driveway.
5360 'CULVER RD X
5365 iCULVER RD X X
5380 ICULVER RD X X X
5385 ICULVER RD !
4700 DAWNVIEWTER !
4750 IDAWNVIEWTER
4751 DAWNVIEWTER X !
4760 ,DAWNVIEWTER
4800 ,DAWNVIEWTER X 1
4801 'DAWNVIEWTER
4821 iDAWNVIEWTER
4830 i DAWNVIEW TER X
4851 'DAWNVIEWTER ! X
4860 iDAWNVIEWTER i i
4900 ,DAWNVIEWTER ,
4901 !DAWNVIEWTER X x I When the timing is appropriate well would like to talk to a city staft person about our driveway and cost
estimates for replacement. Thanks, Jim Nepp/Larry Fonnest(?)
4905 I DAWNVIEWTER !
4910 i DAWNVIEWTER X X
4915 I DAWNVIEWTER
4920 'DAWNVIEWTER i !
like the idea of the reverse curve on Regent Ave (at Scott Ave) - I would love to see path/sidewalk plowed
4925 DAWNVIEWTER X ~~~~e winter along Bassett Creek (through the Nature reser) are they planning to plow the proposed
ewalk west of Dawnview?
4930 'DAWNVIEWTER I o concerns - we're excited to get a new street
4935 'DAWNVIEWTER X
4950 iDAWNVIEWTER X I X
5010 I DAWNVIEWTER 1 I
5020 iDAWNVIEWTER 1
5030 I DAWNVIEWTER X I
5035 'DAWNVIEWTER ,
5040 DAWNVIEWTER X X 1. White, wooden fence on west side Of house. 2. lilac bushes.
5045 'DAWNVIEWTER
5115 DAWNVIEWTER !
5125 IDAWNVIEWTER X
5300 DAWNVIEWTER ,
i
5320 I DAWNVIEWTER I
5360 'DAWNVIEWTER
5380 I DAWNVIEWTER X
5400 iDAWNVlEWTER
: DAWNVIEWTER
4750 IDONA LANE X i
4751 i DONA LANE X , X
,
4800 ,DONA LANE
4801 : DONA LANE !
4850 iDONA LANE I
4851 ,DONA LANE
m interested in further discussion concerning the intersection of Dona Lane and Quail Ave N. I've spoken
If ~.- - ~., ,,~. -, .....,(~""").~".......... ...._,
4860 ,DONA LANE X section. I've seen 2 solutions proposed and if those WElre the only options, tIlen the one delineated in
w (Dona would "T" onto Quail) would be my preference. Still, I think it might be good to have a
versation about this. Thank you for this wondefful opportunity to see the plans and talk to the city's
ft. EverybOdy'S bElEln really hEllpful.
4861 : DONA LANE
4900 i DONA LANE I I
4901 'DONA LANE i i
4905 : DONA LANE X
4910 ,DONA LANE !
We are interested in thEll1I program concerning our sanitary sewer. We are currElntly cleaning out tree
4915 DONA LANE X oots every 6-12 months. 'Part of our currElnt driveway is on our neighbo(s property. WEllive on thEl
comer of Dona LanEl and Quail Ave so are concerned aboutthEl redesign of that intElrsection. Thank you,
Andrea & GrEla VVilev
4920 ,DONA LANE i X
4950 iDONA LANE
4960 IDONA LANE X x
4790 iDRAKE RD X X
4800 'DRAKE RD X X am SEllf emploYEld fulltimEl profElssional acoustic musiC and voice over rElcording studio. I am concElmEld
ith thEl Elftect this will have on my customers and income since my studio is in mv home.
.. ... c ;
c w >
N '" J
... ... ;;.
Address Street -3 w Comments
... o. o.
c c ~ ~
w ~
II ;:: ;::
4801 DRAKE RD X Discussed this at open house. Would like to keep/protect small plum tree next to driveway. should be out
f access area. Would like to transolant some olantinas at front of drivewav.
Ne have a landscaping circle which includes 3 large boulders, landscape rock, bushes and shrubs and is
::~ded by custom cast (molded) cement curbing. This was an expensive landscaping project and of
4810 !DRAKE RD X rse we would like to keep it as undisturbed as possible. Can you let us know what will happen? We
the photo (with your intern) that you have of our front yard. the landscaping circle can be seen on
e photo - Although, will limited detailed - especially the custom cast concrete curbing that surrounds the
c1e. Thank you! Karen Garren
4811 'DRAKE RD
4820 ; DRAKE RD ,
4821 'DRAKE RD
4831 ; DRAKE RD
4850 ,DRAKE RD X 1 X 1
4901 iDRAKE RD 1 Driveway - We will prefer to replace the asphalt driveway as one "complete" unit without any construction
I ioint. We will obtain vour bid & others from orivate installers. Thank vou! Verdi G. Bloniaen
4910 ,DRAKE RD X I
4911 'DRAKE RD I
4920 iDRAKE RD I' ,
4950 ,DRAKE RD 1I i
4960 'DULUTH ST I, I
4962 'DULUTH ST li ,
I
2000 ;GETTYSBURG AVE N 1 None of the above items aoolv to me.
3015 ,GLENDEN TER X X nd of driveway may be too close to neighbors properly lines - prefer to chanae it when street is done
3025 iGLENDEN TER ,
3030 'GLENDEN TER ,
3035 ;GLENDEN TER ~ believe that a neighborhood modification to the general drainage has occurred over the past 20 years
3050 ;GLENDEN TER I
3055 ,GLENDEN TER ur back yard and our neighbor to the north annually during spring thaw have up to 18" of standing water.
would be nice to review and usuallv insoect the drainaae near Glenden, Triton, Lilac. Cdrawina included).
3065 ;GLENDEN TER 1
3070 ;GLENDEN TER
5000 'HAMPTON RD
5005 iHAMPTON RD
5025 'HAMPTON RD
5050 ,HAMPTON RD
5105 ,HAMPTON RD 1
5110 iHAMPTON RD 1
2516 ,LEE AVE , , X
2900 ,LILAC DR N X 1
3100 ,LILAC DR N X ,
3300 ,LILAC DR N 1
3370-4 ; LILAC DR N il
4965 'LOWRY TER [1
5022 ,LOWRY TER " would like to reolace mv drivewav. After readina this information, I hesitate.
"
5042 i LOWRY TER l1
5051 i LOWRY TER ii Sewer] line is about to crack . from house to main line.
,1
;1
5120 'LOWRY TER !I X
5140 ; LOWRY TER n X x
5220 'LOWRY TER 11
11 urrently parking for Gearly Park occurs on both sides of the street. This is dangerous for park patrons as
II can be difficult to see as they cross the street getting to their car when they step out from between
ii ed cars and SUVs. Parking on the residential side of the street makes it difficult for home owners to
Ii when they are backing out of their driveway; and cars parked on both sides of the street (Lowry) does
5240 . LOWRY TER II X )t allow for traffic to flow freely from both directions. Parking limited to the park side of the street would
H iminate these risks. Another way to reduce the risk would be to create nos...in parking at various points
il ound the park. The ground in this area continues to settle year after year. We are concerned that the
I! Jrb and gutter will shift or tilt in relation to the paved road. This could cause eany deterioration or unsafe
Jrfaces.
i; bush, lilac trees and a small fence decorative only with irises, tulips, etc surrounding it. If our
n
5300 !LOWRY TER H X liassessment already covers the fee to reinstall some of these things we would like the fence area replaced.
H Hlf it is a seoarate fee then reolacina is not necessary to us.
5315 ; LOWRY TER j X
5325 'LOWRY TER ,I x Ii
5330 : LOWRY TER
5340 LOWRY TER il "
5360 : LOWRY TER J1 H
5380 i LOWRY TER >, X x
4725 'MARIE LANE E x
4750 'MARiE LANE E II X
4755 MARiE LANE E
4800 ;MARIE LANE E X a
4801 IMARIE LANE E ,i II
';
4810 MARIE LANE E II X X
4811 ;MARIE LANE E " X [i
"
4820 'MARIE LANE E " !,
t
4900 IMARIE LANE E II li
5005 IMARIE LANE W H Ii
5055 'MARIE LANE W II II
5100 'MARIE LANE W n X ii
5125 'MARIE LANE W I X d
ii I
5150 iMARIE LANE W 'i
4800 ;MARKAY RIDGE il ?
li
4805 IMARKAY RIDGE li !!
" iiPlease keep the wide curves at Perry and Westbend and Markay Ridge. The 90 degree corner is not
lj
4810 ;MARKAY RIDGE 11 X iineeded for safety. I've never heard of an accident there. Also we prefer the low curb (like the curb at
H iiSoruce Trail).
:1 " c ~
.Ei & :;
'll " .l! u
Address Street ~ Comments
" " ... ...
" " ~ ~
~ ~
li ;:: ;::
4820 :MARKAY RIDGE ,
4825 iMARKAY RIDGE X X We are on a comer lot I have sprinkler heads along the roads - we DO NOT WANT TO PAY to have them
moved. The citv should oav if the need to be dealt with to out the roads in.
ro?~Ual sprinkler - I strongly prefer the surmountable concrete curb as it was installed on Spruce Trail in
7 - I do want to discuss placement and style of the concrete aprons at our house and our neighbor to
4840 ,MARKAY RIDGE X East - 4820 Markway Ridge because the survey lot stake is located beneath the asphalt apron of our
neighbors driveway - Also please retain the STOP signs on Regent Ave and Westbend Rd. I prefer opton
A for this intersection. COMMENTS FROM 2ND OPEN HOUSE - I would like surmountable curb
4855 :MARKAY RIDGE X X Want to talk about curb
4860 ,MARKAY RIDGE X Want to replace sanitary service and coordinate with our plumber for inside sewer line replacement.
Would like to widen drivewav curb aoron to 22' or 24'. Interested in reolacinQ whole drivewav.
4900 MARKAY RIDGE X andscaoe edaina around Maole tree to contan lanscaoe mulch
4930 ,MARKAY RIDGE
4940 ,MARKAY RIDGE i
lease let me know if retaining wall would be replaced with project. Also advise if a new wall would go up
5100 ,MINNAQUA DR X X on Regent next to property. We are at comer of Regent and Minnaqua. West side of Regent will have
sidewalk and not sure where it would QO. Thank YOU, Stu Holmer
5101 ,MINNAQUA DR I
5110 ,MINNAQUA DR I i Our main concem is with our front landscaoe and the imoact of the oavement.
5120 ,MINNAQUA DR I i
5125 ,MINNAQUA DR I I
5126 IMINNAQUA DR
5129 I MINNAQUA DR , i
5130 IMINNAQUA DR :~~
2107 ,NOBLE AVE N .
2820 :NOBLE AVE N " X X
2841 ,NOBLE AVE N [i
2901 :NOBLE AVE N ;1 i ,:
I i
I jj
4900 : NORMANDY PL i II
" I
4920 iNORMANDY PL ~, i !I
;;
4930 : NORMANDY PL i i "
i
Ii ! IIWe have an elm that we'd like you to do every1hing possible to save. We have been treating it against
4940 I NORMANDY PL " Iloutch Elm Disease for many years. We also have a silver maple in the right of way. It's had some storm
l~ : ,Idamage and if it needs to go, take it.
4944 NORMANDY PL ': l!
4948 I NORMANDY PL 'i 1]
6601 10L YMPIA 5T ., i X H
[,
2055 !ORCHARDAVEN X !:Please put in the new streets and Qutters ASAP. RJ Marks
,; IjMainly concerend with preserving (expensive!) retaining wall and evergreens - You've done an excellent
2121 ,ORCHARD AVE N H X !~ob of keeping home owners informed - very impressive and much appreciated. The "re-do's" of the
n i!streets near us look very nice - I'm sure it will be a mess and annoying for a while - but the end resulsts
!: ,
i' , ilshould be excellent. Thanks
2135 !ORCHARDAVEN " X i l!
2136 ,ORCHARD AVE N ~, X i i i
2143 :ORCHARDAVEN Ii , i
2148 ,ORCHARDAVEN l1 iiwe have 2 shrubs near the fire hydrant fjuniper and "othe(' shrub). We would like a "children at play" sign
H !ion Orchard Ave before the tum onto Markay Ridae.
2157 ,ORCHARD AVE N if X x ! i
::
2160 ,ORCHARD AVE N l! X I X l,no issues
2200 !ORCHARD AVE N " H
2700 iORCHARDAVEN li x n
2710 :ORCHARDAVEN If i
2750 I ORCHARD AVE N r
2770 I ORCHARD AVE N I
2790 iORCHARD AVE N ji X i liHave a concem for 1 or 2 trees near street on Dawnview Terrace.
,
2900 IORCHARDAVE N 11 i !;
; .,
2901 :ORCHARD AVE N H H
3270 IORCHARD AVE N i j ~!
II I
1960 iORDWAY DR I 11
II : IIWould prefer the low rise curb like was used on Spruce Trail - Have huge Maple Tree pratically on top of
2000 ,ORDWAY DR X I ,Isewer line WII15' of street. It may need to go. - Sewer line has been inflitrated by tree roots - Why didn't
II , I ,Ivou have a contract sewer rate like vou do from drivewav? Whv iust 30' & stoo.
2018 ,ORDWAY DR [1 I H
2030 !ORDWAY DR , j 11
';
,i ,:Comment regarding intersection visibility OrdwayiOututh intersection has a sightline problem: enter Duluth
;i ! jj(GV Road) from Ordway, hedge to left blocks view of oncoming Duluth traffic (westbound) - We support
2035 jORDWAY DR II x II"jogging" the Westbend I Regent intersection to slow traffic on Regent - We support narrowing the entry of
1 nWestbend to Ordway to slow traffic. - We support and understood the need for sewer line inspection.
,. ! !:
2050 !ORDWAY DR H
2070 !ORDWAY DR II I
H IIWe would like to keep the triangle island the same configuration. It works just fine this way. Also would
l! :Inot like a catch basin at the southwest corner of my lot. There is currently not one there. Second
Ii Ilcomment card 11/16/07 They are proposing 2 catch basin in the radius at the southwest corner of
n I
Ii limy lot. This may not be necessary for it is not a low pt. There also is a 8" sugar maple tree right there in
JORDWAY DR li
2075 l! X I X he raidius area. the one C.B. proposed on the Ordway side would not pick up any water because the
i~ i
il , drains to east towards Noble. The one proposed on Orachard would only be a flow through C.B: if it
>i be positoned across Ordway on the west side of triangle. Ilthis situalion could be looked at and
,; i
l; i zed more closer, I would not like loosing the tree. If somebody would like to meet there and look it
II I j
i lover, I would be also available. Please check it out.
2091 !ORDWAY DR n X I
2107 'PERRY AVE N " X X I
2110 ,PERRY AVE N I. i I
"
2117 :PERRY AVE N ;<
2120 :PERRY AVE N t, I I
,
2131 :PERRY AVE N II X I I
2134 'PERRY AVE N Ii i I
:1 ... c ~
!:i u
'" ;;
... ... ~ <.>
Address Street u u Comments
... ... .. ..
c c ~ ~
i i ;:: ;::
2141 ,PERRY AVE N I Ii
2142 'PERRY AVE N 'i
2151 'PERRY AVE N '!
2154 'PERRY AVE N " H
2163 IPERRY AVE N ,) x Ii
2164 IPERRY AVE N II H
2203 IPERRY AVE N H
2440 IPERRY AVE N Ii III live at the above address. Will you be putting in sidewalks on Perry Avenue? We don't have anv now.
2445 IPERRY AVE N l! ,1
,~
2480 IPERRY AVE N l! n
,;
2485 'PERRY AVE N 11
2500 IPERRY AVE N li Ii
2505 IPERRY AVE N l! X X l!
2540 IPERRY AVE N lilnterested in havina sidewalk location stated in vard - opposed to sidwalk like the rest of the proiect.
2545 'PERRY AVE N H X l!
2580 IPERRY AVE N [j g
"
2582 ,PERRY AVE N H n
2585 PERRY AVE N '! n
l!
2600 IPERRY AVE N li !i
"
2605 IPERRY AVE N l1 X n 4801
2620 'PERRY AVE N l! X n
2625 'PERRY AVE N :1 l!
2640 ,PERRY AVE N Ii
2655 IPERRY AVE N " "
l!
2670 IPERRY AVE N n
"
2675 IPERRY AVE N n X "
"
2695 IPERRY AVE N n ,
2900 'PERRY AVE N 1! X X X "
f'
11 liTo Mayor loomis and members of the Golden Valley City Council: Re: Sidewalks on Culver Road. Our
jlcomer lot intersects with Culver Road and Perry Avenue North. We have lived here for 43 years, during
II Iwhich time our children have walked the neighborhood and to Noble School without sidewalks. We never
'; . U a safety issue was involved; therefore this unnecessary expense on our residential street seems
l!
2901 PERRY AVE N ,I X lcalled-for. The planning widening of Culver Road and now the proposed adding of a sidewalk are
n rocious for such a residential neighborhood, when considering the projected loss from citizens' lots and
dra cost to them. Besides the dollar cost to everyone (especially those who are retired and elderly), we
el that the City of Golden Valley simple cannot afford the citizen cost for something so questionable. In
jdition, the removal of so many trees resulting from both actions will do nothing to beautify the city. We
re adamantlv oooosed to what we consider the unnecessary and disruotive proposal. We sincerelv hope
2912 IPERRY AVE N
2913 :PERRY AVE N
2924 IPERRY AVE N I
2925 IPERRY AVE N
2936 'PERRY AVE N X
2937 'PERRY AVE N ,
2940 IPERRY AVE N ! X
2942 'PERRY AVE N
2944 PERRY AVE N Saw mv drivewav at the top of the slope approx 10-12 ft. Have had root problems in the past.
We have 9 trees within just a few feet of the existing street. Many of the trees are 50+ years old. Two
2945 'PERRY AVE N maple trees, 1 honey locust, 1 elm, 2 ash and 3 evergreens. Also, on the comer there is a shrub massing.
Please protect all of the root zones (and trees)!
3000 'PERRY AVE N X
3016 'PERRY AVE N
3026 PERRY AVE N
2430 ,QUAIL AVE N
2445 'QUAil AVE N X X
2460 QUAIL AVE N
2475 IQUAIL AVE N Is the city going forward with this plan? The information sent out did not cover sprinkler systems enough,
what is ooino to happen to mine, who is ooino to pav for it?
2490 IQUAll AVE N :
2495 IQUAll AVE N
2500 IQUAll AVE N X i X I Mv problem bia Maple treet near curb edoe
2505 IQUAIL AVE N X I X i aroe everoreen (planted in last 5 vearsl mav be withino 10 ft -I don't want it iniured - it's a beautv.
2540 IQUAll AVE N
2545 IQUAIL AVE N !
2580 IQUAIL AVE N 1
2585 IQUAIL AVE N I
2600 IQUAIL AVE N X
2605 'QUAil AVE N X
2620 'QUAIL AVE N X
2625 IQUAILAVEN :
2640 'QUAil AVE N
2655 'QUAIL AVE N , !
I I::~i~er clean out is accessible easily despite the fact that there is a toilet near it. Some years ago the
2670 ,QUAILAVEN X I nder the street was photographed - everything was correct. I wish my neighbors did not use
: icides for green lawns -I'm concerned about their entering our water supply. Hope the inspection will
,
j 'be pre-Scheduled by at least a couple of weeks - and orefer afternoon.
2675 :QUAll AVE N X I I
2680 'QUAIL AVE N :
2685 QUAIL AVE N j :
2700 'QUAIL AVE N X I No problems. I prefer the "blue" traffic management plan for the intersection of Dona ln and Quail Ave.
Thanks.
2735 ,QUAIL AVE N ,
2745 :QUAIL AVE N ~' I
2755 'QUAIL AVE N
2765 'QUAIL AVE N When will we be able to get advanced notice to move plants. Will access path from Perry to Noble school
e uporaded?
2770 :QUAIL AVE N X :
2775 QUAIL AVE N H
2900 QUAIL AVE N II X x X
!!! ... c
c: ~
N co
"l: ... ~
Address Street ~ Comments
... ... ..
c: c: ~
~ ~ ;:
2901 ,QUAIL AVE N l! X X
2912 ,QUAIL AVE N l!
2915 ,QUAIL AVE N H
2924 iQUAIL AVE N X X
2933 ,QUAILAVEN , 11
2936 'QUAIL AVE N '1 X [:
!! ,1* I would like infonnation on the proposed (if any) changes to the intersection of Quail and Nonnandy (#2),
H 11* Driveway drainage (see attached) (#6), * I would like more infonnation on the video inspection and the
2940 ,QUAIL AVE N ~i X
II I,ramification of agreeing to it. * Assessment history - each year - (#4) [there is a print out of a 5/28/07 email
!'attached to this comment cardl COMMENTS FROM 2ND OPEN HOUSE - drivewav is lower than street
2943 iQUAIL AVE N II li
3001 ,QUAIL AVE N H
3015 ,QUAIL AVE N ,i li
"
3030 ,QUAIL AVE N l! 11
"
3035 iQUAIL AVE N ,I l!
!I ,IWe have a fence within 10ft of the street. We feel that the drastic changes to Culver Road are
3100 'QUAIL AVE N H Ilunnecessarv. The traffic does not warrant it and environmentallv it seems the wrona wav to 00.
"
3101 'QUAIL AVE N H x i
3124 'QUAIL AVE N H i'
3125 ,QUAIL AVE N , X !iThank you for such a thorough explanation of the project. Please explore the safety at the intersection of
i\ X [:Quail & Culver. Thanks!
'I
3138 'QUAIL AVE N II X (
3139 'QUAIL AVE N x H
3142 'QUAILAVEN i~ X X
i,
3145 QUAIL AVE N X X
3146 QUAIL AVE N
3201 ,QUAIL AVE N ~,
3250 'QUAILAVEN
3251 'QUAIL AVE N
3260 ,QUAILAVEN I
3261 iQUAILAVEN ,
3270 ,QUAIL AVE N , X II
3271 iQUAIL AVE N i x 'Thanks for orovidino infonnation to us. The staff was very heloful!
3281 iQUAILAVEN
3300 ,QUAIL AVE N X ,
3301 iQUAILAVEN X ,
3307 ,QUAIL AVE N i
3312 ,QUAILAVEN
3315 IQUAIL AVE N IIThere are grade problems with the driveway and it needs to be done at the same time as the street. The
"floor drain in mv basement backs UP.
3320 'QUAIL AVE N 1 ,;
3345 ,QUAIL AVE N l1
3350 ,QUAILAVEN X , X
,QUAILAVEN I~orry for the delay in this matter, but I have a slight concern/request. My current driveway has a very wide
3355 ,!flair when it meets the street. I was hoping when the city of Golden Valley goes through the the street
liimprovements vou could make the end of the drivewav striahterf'nonnaler". (See below)
3365 iQUAILAVEN j
'QUAIL AVE N
1900 iREGENT AVE N
1920 'REGENT AVE N
1931 ,REGENT AVE N X X IiStairwell drain (contact Alva Rankin @ SEH)
1951 ,REGENT AVE N ;
2001 ,REGENT AVE N 'i
IIWe live at the lot adjacent to the woodeded area. South of Westbend Ave. On November 13th the City
II staff showed my wife and I several proposals for the City's plan to "develop" that wooded lot. The
Ilproposals are - 1. Leave Westbend where it is now located, North of the wooded lot, and develp the
Ilwooded area into a wooded pond area. (The new bike trail would run along the north side of Westbend
2021 'REGENT AVE N X X X Ilwith this new plan.) 2. Remove Westbend and route the new 8 foot wide asphalt bike trail along our
Ilproperty line. 3, Move Westbend so it runs along our property line, on the South side of the woods,
II0ption one is the only proposal that is environmentally and fiscally acceptable. The front of our property is
Ilalready going to be ruined by an 8 foot asphalt path. We opposed this sidealk plan, as do the majority of
lithe residents living along Regent Avenue. To add a second trail, or worse yet, a road, on the North side of
I'our propertY is arosslv un'usl! When we purchased this propertY twelve vears aoo, we were drawn to the
2101 'REGENT AVE N , 1)
III am supportive of the proposed pavement management program. Lease consider reducing the sidewalk
2115 ,REGENT AVE N X X ,Ian Regent width to less than 8 feet since your snow removal equipment is less then that and concrete is
Illess than attractive and unnecessary in residential areas.
2120 'REGENT AVE N X ..
li
lilt is our opinon that an 8 foot wide sidewalk is excessive and unnecessary. We strongly urge the city to
2132 'REGENT AVE N Ilreconsider the size of this sidewalk plan. It seems to us that a 4-6 foot wide sidewalk is all that is needed
I,for this street. Pedestrian traffic safety is important to us, however it should be appropiate to the level of
Ilusaae. This is a heavilv traveled vehicle route, but pedestrian traffic is moderate at best.
2144 'REGENT AVE N H
2157 'REGENT AVE N X "
n
2160 iREGENT AVE N X ! li
2200 'REGENT AVE N i ji
2201 REGENT AVE N X x X , ;j
2224 'REGENT AVE N i )1
2225 ,REGENT AVE N i il
IIWe have 3 pine trees near the street which have been deisnated to be removed by the city. These trees
2244 'REGENT AVE N X X 'Iare in the middle of a slope which we had landscaped for us three years ago. The landscaping consists of
1122 Juniper plants measuring approximately 3 to 3 and a half feet in diameter, one lilac bush and 2
ilhvdranea plants and a larae amount of cedar chipmulch all inside of an in-the-ground border.
2260 'REGENT AVE N X li
2285 iREGENT AVE N X , ;1
2355 ,REGENT AVE N X Ilwe are quite plesed about the planned curb and gutter and the sidewalk. I consider Regent unsafe for
ilpedestrians and am thrilled there will be a safe place far them.
111 ... 1: ;
~ .. >
N .. '3
... ... ~ ()
Address Street .. ~ Comments
... .. e
~ ~ S!
~ ~ ~ ..
i!:
do not want sidewalks. I am not convinced we need them. It is expensive - and will need continuiuos
2405 ,REGENT AVE N x X maintenance & tax $ - It takes out gree space. It change the street. There is a huge loss of privacy. No
one moved in requesting sidwalks. Most moved in because there were no sidewalks or fences. This does
not connect trails. Most people think it is safe enouoh
2420 ,REGENT AVE N X
2425 'REGENT AVE N X X
2440 'REGENT AVE N X i
2445 'REGENT AVE N X , x ,
2460 ,REGENT AVE N :
2465 ,REGENT AVE N ,
2480 'REGENT AVE N ,
2485 REGENT AVE N X ,
2500 'REGENT AVE N ,
2505 ,REGENT AVE N X X , Don't have sump pump, but would like to put one in. 1) Concerned about the addition of the proposed
, sidewalk. 2\ Concerned about damane to naved driveway durinn construction.
2540 'REGENT AVE N i X X Please send sidwalk "ves" or "no" survev, as vou did with curb & outter - thanks Robert
2545 ,REGENT AVE N X
~ -.. ....... "'.., '".~"... ",,,. .. ...,'"..~ _ "'.. ""',. ..,-
ve concrete curbs and a sidewalk on the West side. The street will be 28' wide, curb to curb and the
,REGENT AVE N will be 8' from the curb. This plan will create serious problems for our dirvway which is quite steep
2580 X X present. This plan will also create many problems for neighbors and their landscaping, tree and shrubs.
uld it be possible to simple add a layer of asphalt on the present pavement? This could save a huge
ount of money and keep the neiohbomood as it has been since 1974!
2585 'REGENT AVE N X ,
am opposed to the planned sidewalk for Regent Ave. I have attneded several meetings on this project -
2600 : REGENT AVE N X X X made my position known and each time, told that the policy maker were not present and they are the only
persons capable of makin a decision. No sidewaks on Reoent!
2650 'REGENT AVE N X may be interested in petitionino to remove the stoD siDn at Reoent and Hamoton.
2660 ,REGENT AVE N ,
2665 ,REGENT AVE N , X ,
2670 ,REGENT AVE N i X ,
2680 ,REGENT AVE N I
2700 ,REGENT AVE N
2705 ,REGENT AVE N X I
2720 'REGENT AVE N X X
2725 ,REGENT AVE N X i
2740 'REGENT AVE N X X X
have lived here for over 25 years. There are not enough pedestrians in our area to need a sidewalk at all.
2745 ,REGENT AVE N X n fact, not having one makes our neighbomood different and more nature-like. I really just wanted to let
'ou know that my neighbomood and I oppose the sidewalks. Thank you and pleased consider not putting
em in. Rebecca Walkner 7-1-07
is ironic that the words "Suburban Tranquility" appear on the cover of the brochure that contains
nformation about the pavement management program. Yes, we have that tranquility right now, but with
oUr sidewalk and gutter plans, that will be destroyed. Concrete does not bring tranquility; it destroys it!!
s to the sidewalk issue, I have lived on Regent Ave for over 30 years and I can tell you - we don't need a
2750 :REGENT AVE N X :f~" ,- '"" , ~. ""." .~". "~ .. "" w".,. """" """ , ".. ~. "'" ..
ber in one or two days! Please do your homework before you DESTROY our tranquility. As for gutters,
never seen any standing water anywhere. Please: no sidewalks; no curb & cutter. Thank you from
he neighbors. 2nd comment card - On behalf of myself and 5 of my neighbors we are opposed to the
nstallation of a sidewalk along Regent Avenue. There is absolutely no need for one. I am retired and
ome most of day and eveninn and I have never seen more than one or two neoole walkinn bv mv home.
2775 ,REGENT AVE N l
2805 ,REGENT AVE N
1. Sidewalks are unneccesary, traffic will only speed up and increase safety concems; 2. Reducing street
ize (traffic calming) and putting in only curbs will suffice for road improvement; 3. Sidewalks, based on
merous studies, often result in significant property value reduction 5% - 10%; 4. Residents will likely be
Ie for any accident, injury if there is ice/snow removal delay - despite the city claiming they will keep
2885 ,REGENT AVE N X X X ; 5. Adding sidewalks urbanize our quiet neighbomood. 6. Almost the entire street's residents are
ntly and passionately opposed to having sidewalks. /I COMMENTS FROM 2ND OPEN HOUSE -
Mere is the data to support the efficancy of repair/ replacement of homeowne(s sanitary sewage pipes on
!he amount of I & I? Have you seen any data from any municipality showing more than a slight effect by
replacing these? Much more, the I & I problems come from sump pumps and businesses. Increase
mpervious surfaces will increase 1&1. (comments from Cathv\ 8' wide sidewalk is absurdlv excessive-
2905 ,REGENT AVE N X
2912 ,REGENT AVE N
2915 ,REGENT AVE N
2924 ,REGENT AVE N 1,
2925 ,REGENT AVE N
2935 ,REGENT AVE N X X I~f:~fer Regent with sidewalk minus boulevard. Due to maintenance problems in summer, salt and sand.
in winter.
2936 'REGENT AVE N X X need to replace a sewer line - I do have some concers
2940 ,REGENT AVE N X ,
Everyone on our block agrees that if we have to have a sidewalk on our side of Regent (west side), we
'certainly don't want to have a boulevard for the following reasons: 1. Water will be conserved by not
Nasting it on the sidewalk. 2. Fertilizer will be conserved by not being wasted on the sidewalk. 3. Less
Tlaintenance for home owners by having one edge to trim instead of three. 4. Having the sidewalk abutting
2945 REGENT AVE N X X X :he curb will help keep street salt and sand off the lawn. 5. With the sidewalk installed this way, it will
Tlatch what Crystal has done beyond our north border. 6. Lastly, if you have a neighbor who doesn't care
:0 spend the extra time on a well-kept boulevard, you end up with an eye-sore that wall passers-by will
'notice. An improvement that would be especially appreciated at 2945 Regent would be to install a catch
,basin of some sort that would intercept sand and debris that comes down from the hill on Triton Drive and
,collects in front of our driveway all vear.
:! " 'C ~
.!:i ~ ~
'"
" " & ~
Address Street ~ ~ 0 Comments
" .. ..
c c ~ ~
~ ~ ;:: ;::
Also, we are very concemed about keeping the radius of the curb cuts at our driveway the same as they
~~: now, and have been, for the past 40 years. If a decision is made to change the radius at the street
tlet, we need to discuss this with the planners. Because of the way our house is situated on our lot, it
uld be difficult to back our 22-foot camping trailer (which we keep in the garage) in and out of our
riveway if the flare at the street were changed. Second comment card sent 11/16/071 - WE
ave lived here for 40 years and have never... had a problem with our sewer. I saw no problem (no roots,
o broken pipe) when the TV camera wentthrou my sewer line but, as per the city report, the contractor
.aid it would cost $5000 to satisfy the city.
s a retired city of Minneapolis plumbing inspector of 30 years, I feel these repairs are unnecessary. 2 -
Another thing that concerns us is the 7% administrative fee for repoairs to the first 30 feet of sewer line.
This is an unnecessary burden for long-time homeowners like us. The cost of these unneeded repairs is
more than enough for us to pay. In our opinon, the city should only be concerned about illegal drainage
ltO the sewer from sump pumps, etc. 3 - This is a floow-up note to a letter sent to the Engineering Dept to
ish running the sewer line up to the city property line at the lot at 3020 Scott Ave. This would eliminiate
~~:~ to open up the new street when a house is built on this lot. 4 - WE have been assured by the
sultants and Engineering Dept. that the curb cuts (flares at the end of our driveway) will be located just
they are now. This is very improtant for us so we can back our travle trailer into the garage (where we
re it) without coinc over the crass.
2955 REGENT AVE N X X x e would orefer a 6 inch vs an 8 inch sidewalk. We do suooort havinc sidewalks.
3000 REGENT AVE N
"'y wife and I were undable to atlend the July 11 meeting regarding sidewalks along Regent Avenue. Our
>pinion is that we would like to see a sidewalk with a strip of grass between it and the street. It looks betler
3005 REGENT AVE N X x n the summer and provides a place for snow storage during the winter. Thanks. Toni and David Peters-
lO05 Regent Ave N II comments from 2nd open house - I am ok with putling sidewalks along Regent but
ot ok with an 8 It walk. It distracts from the "neighborhood" look & takes too much green area out of all
he yards. Please consider a 6' walk like the one on G.V. road near the golf course.
3014 REGENT AVE N
3034 REGENT AVE N
3100 REGENT AVE N
3120 REGENT AVE N
3138 REGENT AVE N i
3206 REGENT AVE N
3211 REGENT AVE N i
I don't think a sidewalk 8 feet wide is necessary. I don't know whose wild idea that was, but I'll bet they
3220 REGENT AVE N don't live on Regent. I'd go for a 4 or 5 foot sidewalk (Wide) As far as sewer and drainage, I've had no
serious oroblems. I look forward to a less bumov street - as I'm sure everyone livinc on or near recent is.
In regards to the sidewalk on Regent ave. I orefer not to have a sidewalk- especially a 8 foot sidewalk.
- bus Lines - Can !untion with 4 foot sidewalks. Apparently the 2 petitions that circulated
3221 REGENT AVE N X ve been ignored. Also, in regards to the sewer project, we have tried to cooperate by digging up
basement floor and yard. But now a expensive line is suggestedl As senior citizens living with cancer
stroke this will wipe out our savings. This whole project is a extreme hardship on many senior
esidents.
3230 REGENT AVE N
3231 REGENT AVE N X i X X
3240 REGENT AVE N l
3241 REGENT AVE N
3244 REGENT AVE N
3245 REGENT AVE N X X
3248 REGENT AVE N
I concern is the hill on the north side of our lot. Our garage and driveway are approximately 6' away from
3249 REGENT AVE N X X X e street. The grade of the hill is steep. Will some sort of retaining wall be needed? And if so, are we
l Ie to helD decide how it looks? [ohotos included]
3300 REGENT AVE N X i X X j
3311 REGENT AVE N X X i
3312 REGENT AVE N X :
I have been hospitalized and not home until lately. 1st of all I'm against a sidewalk. I moved out of the
cities to get away from all this. 2. Regent Ave does not need a sidewalk. 3. Regent Ave is wider than a
great of an street in Golden Valley. What is wrong with the present street width? Ig it is for dog walks, they
3320 REGENT AVE N can take the dogs to the park. Are the residents going to be taxed earch year for G'v. to plow the
sidewalk? Who will pay for the up keep of the sidewalk? Being damaged by lawn mowers and city snow
plows (like my front yard) Thank you fo repairing my lawn each year. I have nop problem with garabge
cans in mv drivewav. A 4 foot sidewalk is steader size and the size is aoorooiate for the cause.
3321 REGENT AVE N X i X ,
3329 REGENT AVE N 1 X X
3330 REGENT AVE N X
3333 REGENT AVE N i X I
3338 REGENT AVE N i
3345 REGENT AVE N X X
3348 REGENT AVE N i
3355 REGENT AVE N 1 j
1941-3 REGENT AVE N
REGENT AVE N
2600 SCOTT AVE N
2605 SCOTT AVE N
2655 SCOTT AVE N i
2660 SCOTT AVE N i
2665 SCOTT AVE N
2670 SCOTT AVE N i
2675 SCOTT AVE N
2685 SCOTT AVE N
2725 SCOTT AVE N r i
2735 SCOTT AVE N ,
E! -g ~ ;
.. >
N .. :;
'C 'C ~ u
Address Street .. .. Comments
'C 'C .. ~
c c ~
.. ~
II ~ i!:
hung onto this for a few weeks to consider the question, but I cannot think of any issues to point out.
2740 : SCOTT AVE N hank you for forwarding the packet to me. I am very likely to take the opportunity to replace my blacktop
drivewav.
2745 : SCOTT AVE N ,
2755 : SCOTT AVE N ,
2800 'SCOTT AVE N l ,
2805 ,SCOTT AVE N 1 x
2820 : SCOTT AVE N j X
2900 : SCOTT AVE N
2905 : SCOTT AVE N
2910 : SCOTT AVE N !
heartily approve the construction of sidewalks on all blocks. However, they must be constructed on all
3005 : SCOTT AVE N X through streets and trails that are a part of streets. I also look forward to no more water puddles in the
street after a rain.
3020 !SCOTT AVE N
3030 : SCOTT AVE N X X , We appreciate your efforts to continue making our city one of QualilY - Thanks to all of you!
3050 !SCOTT AVE N jj j
3055 : SCOTT AVE N
3210 ',SCOTT AVE N X !
3211 SCOTT AVE N
Group home with 4 mentally challenged men at Day Programlwork . leave 8.9 AM and return 3-5
PM. 2 men have mobility problems and vision problems, one of which uses a walker from the van
3220 lSCOTT AVE N X X o the house and a hand pushed wheelchair for longer distances. My concerns are access for the
home clients and staff parking (we have 2 house vans and usually have 1.3 employee vehicles
arked out frontl.
3221 'SCOTT AVE N
3231 'SCOTT AVE N X
3232 ,SCOTT AVE N X ,
3240 SCOTT AVE N i
3241 SCOTT AVE N X
3244 SCOTT AVE N ! H
3245 'SCOTT AVE N
3249 !SCOTT AVE N X
3301 SCOTT AVE N X
1:1 have a stone planter at SW corner of lot that is partially in ROW, but back 6-8' from edge of street. Also, I
I:have 2 spruce trees at NW corner of lot that have branches within 1-2 feet of street and probably trunks in
3320 lSCOTT AVE N X x IjROW of course, I would like to see all of these remain undamaged. These were existing when I bought the
l!house so not of my doing. In spite of what SEH traffic engineer said to me about speeds on Regent Ave, I
iibelieve the stop signs at 33rd Ave on Regent do slow speeds down and should be kept.
3321 'SCOTT AVE N ! [1
3328 : SCOTT AVE N l!
3336 'SCOTT AVE N , l1
l'
3344 'SCOTT AVE N X , li
3352 !SCOTT AVE N X i!Should storm sewers be added now rather than the future? Water forms a lake at the end of our driveway.
3355 'SCOTT AVE N X , l!
,
3360 ,SCOTT AVE N X I lIStatisticaly complaince with III will have very little impact on the total amount of sewer. I makes sense to
, Iltarget complance for sump pumps and gutter drainage, but not for tree toot problems.
3365 : SCOTT AVE N I !!
I 111) Driveway has split at approximately 10th ft from street; would like this 10ft section replaced with rebuild
3368 ,SCOTT AVE N X ! X ::of street. Otherwise will have 3 floating sections instead of 2. 2) Will new section be connected to old
, :Isection? 3) Cottonwood tree at approximately 15 ft from street. [diagram included]
!
3376 !SCOTT AVE N , !I
3384 : SCOTT AVE N I
3385 : SCOTT AVE N X
3390 : SCOTT AVE N ,
3398 : SCOTT AVE N 1
3335-7 I SCOTT AVE N !
4835 I SORELL AVE
4840 :SORELL AVE I X
4875 :SORELL AVE
4880 !SORELLAVE : none ofthe above
4920 I SORELL AVE
4925 : SORELL AVE ,
4935 : SORELL AVE X i
4936 'SORELL AVE X
4944 'SORELL AVE X
4945 :SORELL AVE : am handicaooed and must have access to and from mv drivewav.
4955 :SORELL AVE ,
4960 ISORELL AVE
4975 'SORELL AVE ,
4980 !SORELL AVE X i : X
1856 !TOLEDOAVE N !
4901 !TRITON DR j
5205 :TRITON DR X X I
5225 'TRITON DR : ,
5245 :TRITON DR !
5255 !TRITON DR I
5300 !TRITON DR !
5310 :TRITON DR X 1
5320 !TRITON DR H
5325 :TRITON DR X ,jdiscarges in back yard - street light reQuest Triton I Scott Ave
5340 ITRITON DR ! :j
5350 :TRITON DR ! ,
5385 !TRITON OR i i H
4835 WESTBEND RD J
4840 WESTBEND RD , JWe live on a comer and have sprinkler heads approximately 6" from curb on both sides.
4875 WESTBEND RD 'II have 2 pine trees with the trunks of the tree about 12 to 13 feet from the street that I am concerned about.
4920 :WESTBEND RD : l,
4925 lWESTBEND RD X i!
~ ." C ~
..
c .. >
.. '" 'S
." 'll ~
Address Street .. 0 Comments
." ." t- t-
C C ~ ~
~ ~ i!:
4935 ,WESTBEND RD II l!
4945 :WESTBEND RD I i ! I:
4955 'WESTBEND RD II I II
!WESTBEND RD !! ,
4981 1 I ~
5000 WESTBEND RD H 11
if I ,
!i I ill am concerned about the pine trees in my yard as well as some of the other landscaping - they are at or
2100 :WlNDSDR WAY !!close to 10 feet of the street. How will this be handled? Will the city replace trees, plants, etc., that may be
;: i I :Ikilled during this proiect? Penelope M Sweitzer
l' I
2107 :WlNDSOR WAY i
2110 :WlNDSOR WAY B l ..
I
2117 !WlNDSOR WAY ,; I;
2120 :WlNDSOR WAY H
,; lione sprinkler head north side of driveway. Retaining wall 3' from curb supply line for backyard goes in
2131 'WINDSOR WAY :: I
'i II between wall and street. {this one came with illustration of vardl
,~
2132 !WlNDSOR WAY q ! h
2143 !WlNDSOR WAY l! X I I:
2144 !WlNDSOR WAY Ii j
2157 'WINDSOR WAY n I 11
2160 :WlNDSOR WAY ;i I H
i
H I IIWill be extremely upset to lose old elm tree approximately 10ft from street, some bushes and small
2200 :WlNDSOR WAY li X X
l! Ilaarden.
" :IWe're interested in infor about burying electirc's phone wires - different options on curbs - not rounding
2201 :WlNDSOR WAY II I x
l! I jlcomers so sharplv 1901 in our neighborhood.
2223 :WlNDSOR WAY 11 X X i ji
i1 ! 'I
II J I:we built (had built) our house on the comer of Windsor Way & Markay Ridge in 1961. I did the elevation
Ii i !!work myself so that we could drive onto our back yard if we wanted to. Over the years this "plan ahead"
II ! ! ilhas become very importlllnt to us - to unload heavy groceries, to permit easy access to our own house to
II , ,Ihandicapped people, etc. Where the street and our back yard match elevation I request a "mountable
i
1j l Icurb" about 1 0 feet long to facilitate our use of this arrangement. Thank you - Glenn & Marlys Fuller /I
2224 :WlNDSOR WAY X X I II COMMENTS FROM 2ND OPEN HOUSE - Homeowner has question about street grades and yard
Ii I Ilimpacts - would like someone to call him to explain - sent question. 2nd response card - 1. The sanitary
Ii i
! Ilsewer servicve compliance inspection was done on 10/30/07. As yet we have not heard back from Golden
,
l! i ::Valley one the city's reaction to our inspection. 2. We prefer the low level curbs as were put into the spuce
!
II i Iltrail area across Noble Ave from us. 3. Where Westbend is being closed off just west of Regent Ave -
,i , liThe trail should be brought over to Regent along the "frormer" Westbend Radway - not south of this area clo
H
I
i ,
4815 Culver Rd - BOB R HAGEN. JR & SHEILA R BAHt.
Please review the following attachment. It explains in more detail our concerns listed below: 1 )drainage concerns, 2)impact on trees and greenspace 3)design and aesthetic
concerns 4)environmental concerns 5) re-grading concerns 6)overall impact to the neighborhoods - Thank you. Our first concern with the city's proposal to widen Culver Road
and add up to an eight foot sidewalk involves our driveway drainage both near Culver Road and away from our garage door. The driveway has very little slope and we worry that
near Culver Road, regardless of its eventual width, the Road may at slope away from the driveway enough to provide adequate drainage. We know there are plans to put in
storm drains that may keep water from spilling into the end of the driveway as it currently does, but reamin concerned at the grade at the end of the driveway. At the garage end
of the driveway we are concerned that a sidewalk, of one is built, would create a dam and that water would flow back into ourgarage, and ultimately our basement, as we have a
tuck -under garage. Our main concern is the loss of our trees and green space stemming from a wider road and possibly the adition of the proposed eight foot sidewalk. WE
have two hugee 55+ year old Evergreen trees near the road that would be removed and another 55+ year old Honey Locust tree that will be damaged or killed by the necessaryy
re-grading of the front yard. This would be a loss not only to us, but also to the rest of the neighborhood. Many residents and poeple who visit our neighborood often comment
on the beau1y of our large trees and how this feels more like a rural area. \Mthy many in the neighborhood working dowtown (according to the 200 U.S Census, 29 percent of the
Golden Valley workers age 16 or over work in Minneapolis or St. Paul), our nieghborhood serves as a refuge and oasis from the noise, congestion, and visual hardness of the
asphalt and concrete of the central cities. The addition of an 8'sidewalk seems totally out of place on such a small, quiet residential street. It would be out of scale with our
houeses and would seem more suitable in front of a hospital. SChool. (even the sidewalk on Noble Avenue by Noble School is only five feet wide) or large office building.
Moreover, it would create the impression that this is a faster street, than it is, encouraging faster traffic speeds. Visually, a large sidewalk placed about 15' cioser to our front
doors would create a great deal of visual tension that would be disconcerting. The neighborhood's lot size just aren't large enough, and our homes are too near the street, to
handle this scale Of sidewalk. Peronall, having a road and sidewalk 15' closer to our front door would impact our sense of security and privaCy, particularly since we would lose
our trees. As it is, one evergreen tree blocks our view of an asphalt intersection to the west and another hides a neighhorhood's car-laden driveway to the east. The trees also
privide shade to walkers, reduce runoff and waste water processing costs and reduce our need for air-conditioning. We need to start thinking about the affect Global Warming
will have opn the livability of Golden Valley. Adding more asphalt and concrete, unless absolutely necessary, seems unwise. We understnad that asphalt and concrete does not
"cause" Global Warming, but climate change needs to be considered, It is not longer a 1970s world. The loss of many mature trees and additional acres of asphalt and
concrete would also contriute to more runoff into Bassett Creek. We, and many of our neighbors, would be interested in working with the city to do our part to help find local
solutions to help mitigate climate change. We are aware that we can only do so much on the local level, but we think it is our dity to do what we can. Whatever happanes with
the Culver Road project, we would still be excited to work with the city on this issue. We are very organized as a neighborhood, so we hope you will make use If all these
intelligent well~ntended people. this is a great opportunity to get people engaged in something truly worthwhile. We also have concems about plans to re-grade our front yard
and the yards of selected neighbors. We dislike the looks of retaining walls. but also find the idea of increasing the slope of our front yard unacceptable. It is hard enough to
mow as it is, and as we get older, we think this Will be a hardship. Also, we think this would necessitate the construction of steeper steps to our front door, which could be
Regent and Westbend Meeting Comments
pn reI Closing Westbend between Scott and Regent. 1) Access restricted from Toledo east onto DUluth Street
rxtremelY dangerous especially during snow searson ooften it is difficult to turn west from Toledo onto Dulith phor to
snow plows and/or snad/salt. 2) Group home on 19th and Toledo w parked cars and care pickups narrows street to
2000 :Toledo Ave N one lane of traffic. 3)whater backup from drain on 19th and Toledo will prevent direct access to local homeowners
'due to flooding in heavy rain. 4) Convenient to access Regent and Noble via Scott with out entering Dulith St to travel
east. 5)North trun from Duluith from the west very dangerous. 6) Safety - Safety - Safety - WE need Westbend 7)
Received NO notice from Public Info Open House 8)Build up Regent Posibly 1 and 1/2 ft with slope to Westbend
I probably more water problems for Resident on Scott
, I live across the street from the group home which is currently a one lane road drive up to the ars parked in the street.
I I' already have difficulty getting out of my dnveway and getting into it. I wait behind the parked cars for the cars to get
1821 'Toledo Ave N i through coming toward Dulith St in the morning. I sit in my drive waiting to get out from traffic going both ways. We
need regent available fr some of this traffic specially turning left on Duluth. The line of cars front of my home will be
I iexcessive, the cars on Duluth DO NOT make a full stop at Regent so there are few breaks to get into the traffic, or
I Iturning in at night.
I
I Thank you for inviting us inviting us to the meeting: Our thoughts: Please keep the 4 way stop sign at
2001 I Regent Ave N i Regent and WestBend if you keep West Bend - We would be in favor of either: 1) scott as a cul-de-sac - or
i 2) leave west bend where it is. . I am NOT in favor of moving West Bend South - PS Re: Sidwealks - love'
I em! - But...would also love a Boulevard!
I Patricia Roelofs, 1910 Toledo Avenue (comer of Duluth Street) called. She is very strongly opposed to
'closing Westbend east of Regent. She currently goes through the intersection during rush hours to access
1910 ,Toledo Ave N either the stop signs at Regent or the signal at Regent to get onto Duluth StreeVGolden Valley Road. She
I stated that too many access points have been closed in the past and this will cause too many problems for
her and her immediate neighbors.
, I
, I : ,
! ." C i
c u >
N .. "S
." ." &! u
Address Street u u Comments
." ." .. ..
~ c ~ ~
~ ;: ;:
1
l i
I IWeb Responses:
I From: Kathy.Haiker (mailto:Kathy.Haiker@target.com]
I i : Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:45 PM
I I To: Cityhall
, Cc: Kathy. Haiker
;
1 i Subject: Side Walk decision
1 I
I , We have owned our house in Golden valley now for 9 years and love the area. We have considered
i moving multiple times and have chosen to stay for the many great things Golden Valley Can offer us. We
i have been hearing about the plans for the new sidewalk & curb which is fabulous! We are excited about
I i
i the thought of having a sidewalk to use and eniov.
i !
.i
I am writing to you because I have just become aware of the news that the city is contemplating putting in
Ian 8 foot sidewalk, when the standard required sidewalk is 4 feet. I am hoping this is just a rumor as it
,seems ridiculous for our currently lovely neighborhood. According to the letter I received the city is looking
I into an 8 foot Sidewalk for the following reasons;
, I> GV purchased new snow removal equipment that is 5 feet wide
I
10 Sounds like this was a case of very poor planning that the residents shouldn't be punished for. I think
the city needs to make the right decision for long term city growth, and then figure out how to make the
equipment work. If this is even a deciding factor then we have the wrong people in office making bad short
Iterm decisions.
I> Extra room for garbage cans
0 Residents currently put their garbage cans at the end of their driveway. There is no reason this will, or
should, change.
I I> Extra room for signs
I 0 You're kidding right? A sign? At the base as sign is what - 2x2?
> Extra room for open car doors
0 What a joke. We don't have anywhere near the traffic level of pedestrians, pets, or parked cars, to
need this. Anyone that thinks we do should step out of their office and visit our street.
,I think this 8 foot sidewalk is thewrona decision for so many reasons including;
I > Eco friendly - most corporations are making the right decision for our environment & I expect the
same for our city. This is a waste of unnecessary concrete & there is no reason to ruin living
I plant/grass/trees in the process.
I > Visually - Our neighborhood is one of cozy atmosphere, with big trees, and lots of plants. This would
I . detract from this and take away the reason many of us live here.
! > No Reason! I have not been presented with one single good reason why the city would even
I contemplate such a bad decision. Quite frankly - the fact that the city is even entertaining this
, preposterous thought makes me want to move out of Golden Valley.
I j l
I I : Please respond asap and let me know where this decision is at. I will do everything possible to fight this
I bad decision and those who are making it. I think we need to work together to make Golden Valley a
I !strong community that everYone wants to live in. This tvpe of decision is steering us in the wrong direction.
1 i I
i
I i IThank you,
I Kathy Haiker
12650 Regent Ave N
1 Golden Valley, MN 55422
- avemen anagemen rogram
Street I Homes I Replies I Question 1 I Question 2 I No Choice
33rd Avenue North 25 15 11 4 0
Bassett Creek Drive 18 15 11 3 1
Cherokee Place 10 5 5 0 0
Culver Road 29 19 14 5 0
Dawnview Terrace
Regent to Noble 26 16 14 0 2
Lilac to Scott 7 4 4 0 0
Dona Lane 16 12 11 1 0
Drake Road 14 6 5 1 0
Glenden Terrace 8 4 3 1 0
Hampton Road 6 4 4 0 0
Lowry Terrace 14 6 6 0 0
Marie Lane East 9 7 7 0 0
Marie Lane West 5 1 0 1 0
Markay Ridge 11 4 4 0 0
Minnaqua Drive 8 5 3 0 2
Normandy Place 6 4 3 1 0
Orchard Avenue North
Ordway to Markay 9 5 4 1 0
Marie Lane East to Dawnview 5 3 2 1 0
Ordway 10 4 4 0 0
Perry Avenue North
Westbend to Markay 13 6 5 1 0
Bassett Crk Dr to Marie Lane W 20 16 12 4 0
Culver to Triton 16 9 7 2 0
Quail Avenue North
Bassett Crk Dr to Culver 29 13 13 0 0
Culver to 34th 43 17 16 1 0
Regent Avenue North
Duluth St to Culver 55 30 24 6 0
Culver to 34th 44 20 18 1 1
Scott Avenue North
Hampton to Regent 10 5 4 0 1
Dawnview to Triton 11 7 5 2 0
Lowry to Lilac 29 13 11 2 0
Sorell Avenue North 14 11 10 1 0
Triton Drive 11 5 5 0 0
Westbend Road 8 7 6 1 0
Windsor Way 15 8 7 1 0
Appendix B
Street Survey Results
2008 2009 P t M t P
TOTAL
TOTAL PERCENT
554
306
55.2
258
46.6
41
7.4
7
1.3
Survey Questions:
Question 1: I prefer that the streets in my neighborhood be reconstructed with concrete curb and gutter.
Question 2: I prefer that the streets in my neighborhood be reconstructed without concrete curb and gutter.
Appendix C
Hey
Memorandum
Public Works
763.593.8030 I 763.593.3988 (fax)
Date: January 3, 2008
To: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
From: AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator M
Subject: Tree and Shrub Impacts: 2008/2009 Pavement Management Program
Based upon the preliminary design for this project, staff has established an estimate of the
potential tree and shrub impacts for the 2008/2009 Pavement Management Program.
The majority of the impacts to trees and shrubs in the 2008/2009 project area will be related to
water quality pond and wetland installations. A limited number of significant trees will be
removed due to street reconstruction, sidewalk installation or curb alignment. A significant
number of trees located in the right-of-way have been designated for tree protection. This
protection may include fencing and directionalized boring or tunneling under these trees when
new gas mains and gas services are required.
Most of the tree and shrub removal decisions will be made in the field during construction. The
following is a breakdown of the potential tree impacts:
~ Approximately twenty one (21) trees and ninety five (95) shrubs may need to be
removed and replaced for the proposed street, sidewalk, utility and concrete curb
installation.
~ Approximately fourteen (14) trees are proposed to be removed for installation of a water
quality pond/wetland adjacent to the 2600 block of Scott Avenue N (Additional plantings
are planned)
~ Approximately thirty five (35) trees are proposed to be removed for installation of a water
quality pond/wetland adjacent to Regent Avenue Nand Westbend Road.
~ Impacts to trees and shrubs due to utility service repairs are anticipated to be low.
Recommended repairs for sanitary services will include lining in most circumstances as
apposed to removal and replacement.
The City Forester and Assistant Forester will be responsible for monitoring and inspecting tree
and shrub impacts during the entire project. If tree or shrub removal is required, each will be
replaced on a 1-to-1 basis. Additional trees or shrubs are added for larger removals. A color
photo list of replacement trees and shrubs with information regarding their characteristics
including mature size, fall color and growth habits is provided to each resident.
The replacement shade trees are 2-Y:z inches in diameter at the base and balled in burlap.
Replacement evergreen trees are six feet high. The trees are furnished, installed and
warranted for two years by the contractor. Replacement trees and shrubs can be located
G:\Forestry\Pavement Management Program\2008 PMP\Memo's\Appendix C Feasibliity Report.doc
Address
street
. 1900 I REGENT AVE N
;. -"-'-'-__'_"'l_...o-..-~"";"""""_'V"~'~'~'
i 1920 iREGENT AVE N
..........'............-........-..........1__...":._...._.._..........
! 1931. ,REGENT AVE N
e- 1e51:-']REGENT A~-'
1..~2.~L..I~!oQ~~!.!-~Jl_..~_
2021 I REGENT AVE N
f-..
I
I
i
........."...........t-.......
. .
'..b.__.~__~_,_...._....,._......__._.....________.
r.:'
, ........210i..."...1REGENTAVE..N..........-
j_.._.._-~-_...~_.~-_..!'......_.~_._-_.......--_.:._---..
i i
I 2115 iREGENT AVE N
I
t.-.-.-...._.__.....____.~..,.I._._..............._............_......__._.............
i 2120 : REGENT AVE N
(--'''-1'
I I
i
2132 I REGENT AVE N
2244
!:.::::li:....~:.J~~f~Hv1K=-
2355 'REGENT AVE N
2405
jREGENT AVE N
j
i .........._._...._.....__...................,.......
i 2420 REGENT AVE N
! --''2425-'- EGENT AVE N ..
. 2440 . EGENT AVE N
[.::::::::1~.C:]~E.'~g..~~~_r~C.....
t._~!l..Q..__.L~EGE~.~~~_.._..__
:!
"
.
"
j
"
c
'"
"
'3
j
Comments from Comment Cards
x .. --_..__._..i~.~!Y!'~!l~~i~l~~ff6!yi~~~jri~i..~~BL::==:::..::::::::::::::..':::::.:::..':::==:::::::::::='"
.._' ............-_-.1....-.... ---i--.--.----_....._.. .......-----.-----.........'1
---- - ,- ..._...~.._...!..__......._.~.._......u..........'^.~.~,_..~~~_'_...~_~._._....~..___...~_....~~._.....~._~~..~_~..,,~._...~.........~...._~.~,....._...__....~.."._......_...._M._~.__..'^_,. _....._.._.~__..~...~_~~.u.........
I !We live at the lot adjacent to the woodeded area. South of Westbend Ave. On November 13th the City I
istaff showed my wife and I several proposals for the City's plan to "develop" that wooded lot The I
i Proposals are - 1. Leave Westbend where it is now located, North of the wooded lot, and develp the
jwooded area into a wooded pond area. (The new bike trail would run along the north side of Westbend !
x Iwith this new plan.) 2. Remove Westbend and route the new 8 foot wide asphalt bike trail along OUr I
lproperty line. 3. Move Westbend so it runs along our property line, on the South side of the woods. !
10ption one is the only proposal that is environmentally and fiscally acceptable. The front of our property I
I is already going to be ruined by an 8 foot asphalt path. We opposed this sidealk plan, as do the majority I
i of the residents living. along Regent Avenue.
x
I
I
......_...1..............
" To add a second trail, or worse yet, a road, on the North side of our property is grossly unjust! When we
purchased this property twelve years ago, we were drawn to the natural feel of the yard and that it isn't a ,
I corner lot. To be forced to live on a lot with streets rUMing on three sides of our property will destroy the i
! natural beauty, and the v1aue 'of the house. We fought to preseve these same woods in 2001. At that _I
!time, we sbumitted a petition with 100's of names from all over the nieghborhood to protect the woods. I
I 1 (That petition is a matter of public record.) .
...._...-r---I~~=i~~~~b~=::~:~~:i:~:o~~~:~~i:~~~:=~:r-:::~~~~.Iot "1
! by Westbend. We used to love our property and have great pride in it and our neighborhood. Now we I
i only wish to leave this house and this City. The City is determined to destroy the homes and it taxes and i
i return the land to a weUand. At the conclusion of the meeting I asked that the City consider another !
joption. Buy our house and destroy it, with the trees. You'll gain that much more land for asphalt and
iweUand$. Dana and Joleen Perkins
i
_.........._......-....j-~._..._.....~......._.__...._...-.............-._._......~..~-~_.-...~........~.....~~._..._.._..__.~....;.----~......_..........'_...._.......~_......_._..._......._.~.._~...-...._...._."'._,.~......-_............~....._.-...............
....-.^;...'^..----~--~..._,-...-,..,.__..-...".___".~..__.~.._"._._fi__...._..._....._'A."_."._..._.._._.,...~~,~.~....___._.__......."..........,.__.~_.._....,_r_....__..........
I II am supportive of the proposed pavement management program. lease consider reducing the
xl.' X Isidewalk ~n Regent width t~ less than 8 feet sin~ you~ s~ removal equipment is less then that and
. I concrete IS less than attractIVe and unnecessary .n reSIdential areas.
...._....l~~......=r-----::.=====~=:....."-"._._====:-...---.-.... ...---..--"-....... .........._~-_..__...."..._... _I
I ! It is our opinon that an 8 foot wide sidewalk is excessive and unnecessary. We strongly urge the city to i
I : reconsider the size of this sidewalk plan, It seems to us that a 4-6 foot wide sidewalk is all that is 1
I !~:~:~ :~~~~ ~:~~ =~~~~~;~~~S~;;!~!;~;.~~~~~~;~~~;t;~~~~te to the I
I
..._.-=:...::::~~:~=.=.._....._.~=:.=::::::=::::::::::::::::~=____..._..___.~:::::::.:.:=:::::==:=.-=:::::::::.:::=::::::=::::::,:::::::==:::"1
.........."'-""'-~~!
___1.._->>
;
;
.~....~._.....~-i.....-~._..~..............~_...M_...._...,__..._......_._.._....".,~._~...._.._."...~_.~y_................_...~.......""...._...""'......__..._.~........_~._...._..........___...n......._'..........~........._,_..'__'''_'.
-.._......!.-._.-..}.,........................._.~.--.._-_....._..-......_.........._-_..._..............._.....-..~....._._. ....................._..__...._..................................,......_...M................__..."...................__...._..........._....~.... ... ..............._..J
_....-.-.-.............-.....;..j....~,....~;..,................._.......,.._-__............._,_................_................-.......,__........._...-..............m.-................-......m..'-.._......._-_..."'"...."..........................................._...-.._.............~.............."'J
. . ! !
------[we ~_;~_;~ trees near the ;;;which have been ~~;snated ~~ be remov;;~~ the ci;. These t~~l
X iare in the middle of a slope which we had landscaped for us three years ago. The landscaping collsists I
!Of22 Juniper plants measuring approximately 3 to 3 and a half feet in diameter, one lilac bush and 2 I
! __Jhyd~~~~~~:.~~_~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~ c~~~~~~~I~..~~.~ o~~~~~~~~~~~~.~rde~.._.......
x
are quite plesedliboutthe piannetrCiJiband gutter'andtheSidewaii<:reonslderRegenl"iiiisatefo
._!!!!.~!I.IJHm;!.!.mJhril!!c! the~.~YL!?~.!!I.!l!.fl!.I!!!~19!. the'l1c....__...__...__..__................
do not want sidewalks. I am not convinced we need them. It is expensive - and will need continuiuos
& tax $ - It takes out gree space. It change the street. There is a huge loss of privacy. N
moved in requesting sidwalks. Most moved in because there were no sidewalks or fences. This
not connect trails. Most people think it is safe enough
....._.................._....:..........._......._........................:===......=.........:".............~=::=:...........=-~=::~=...J
. I
: AA._.~_..._--...-._..._._.._--..._..l
,.--; -1 Don't have sump pump, but would like to put one in. 1) concem~ about the addition of the proposed .'1
I isidewalk. 2) Concemed about damage to paved driveway during. construction.
C-jr=lplease send sidwalk "yes" or "ncfs"'UiVey,"as you did with cufi)"&gUtter - thari"k'SROtiert-.--.----..J
i ! .'
---- -- ..---.~.f..--.----_.-._-_......--_..._._........,..........._.._.,~..-,--.....".-...---.....-....--.-...-.--.............-...
I IAS I understand the situation, based on a visit with Brad, the decision have already been made. The
! !street will have concrete curbs and a sidewalk on the West side. The street will be2S' wide, curb to curb
jand the sidewalk will be 8' from the curb. This plan will create serious problems for our dirvway which is
x !quite steep at present. This plan will also create many problems for neighbors and their landscaping,
.1 ltree and shrubs. Would it be poSSible to simple add a layer of asphalt on the present pavement? This I
~~_j~~__. -'-bJ-~-:---~:==_:=____J
I' ! I am opposed to the planned sidewalk for Rege~t Ave. I have attneded several meetings on this project -I
2600 IREGENT AVE N X X jmade my position known and each time, told that the policy maker were not present and they are the !
,.! ,I !only persons capable of makin a decision. No sidewaks on ~egentl I
............_......-m~~~~r~~~::.::::;C:::..f-:.J.::~~.=:=:I!.'.!Ii.!yjit~lJ!!!.!.~~:!ii~1l1n.i!iiiffiQ~]Ii!~i.i9~~Ht~9!!!iii!~n!~i.!i.Pio..il~::....:::=::::=::.:=::::~:::::::=:::::::l
iREGENTAVEN . n. .......' ..!. ... . ... .. ..... ...... . .... ... .'
ENTAvEN' ....... =:~_=.! =..:::::1=:.... .__. .......::=~::..:~~~ --::---...-... .................._....._..........._....^".__......._.=:::=_.-..~..== I
AVE N I X .._..__......_..._.._........_._._.......__......_.___........__....................._.._......_._....._........_......._......._..................................................1
ENi~~~"" i ............... ..' . ...-.............................................................................................--..-.-...-............................-................. ............................-.................. ...............--...........!
.._.....i~~~~~ ~~~_~~~ ..._~..~I..~::=F~~....--..~~.:==- ___~-~~=~.~~==~=~==.~~~=~=.:=~~~~~.~=.=~~"...~...~=~~.~..~..~~]
!__....P40:~j.~~~~~~.:__.... .. ....2........1_..____==..........................======:::==.=-.....--==-.........c.....=::~=:::~=::::..~~..:::~::==:::.1
I I! I have lived here for over 25 years. There are not enough pedestrians in our area to need a sidewalk at
2745 I REGENT AVE N X II' iall. In fact, not having one makes our neighborhood different and more nature-like, I really just wanted
ito let you know that my neighborhood and I oppose the sidewalks. Thank you and pleased consider not
! putting them in. Rebecca Walkner 7-1-07
.., ' '." ...........___. i
...----"'I---'It is~roniC ~. t the words .Suburban Tranquility" appear on the cover of the brochure that contains .,
!information about the pavement management program. Yes, we have that tranquility right now, but with
iyour sidewalk l!!nd gutter plans, that will be destroyed. Concrete does not bring tranquility; it destroys itll
iAs to the sidewalk issue, I have lived on Regent Ave for over 30 years and I can tell you - we don~ need
!a Sid~~~...~~~..~~~...~~.r.~.~~.~~~~~..~..~~.~~~..~~~~~~~:............................._................._...._..............................~..........
! Never have I seen more than that number in one or two days! Please do your homework before you I
! DESTROY our tranquility. As for gutters,.. I have never seen any standing water anywhere. Please: no
!sidewalks; no curb & cutter. Thank you from all the neighbors. 2nd comment card. On behalf of myself .
iand 5 of my neighbors we are opposed to the installation of a sidewalk along Regent Avenue. There is I
i absolutely no need for one. I am retired and home most of day and evening and I have never seen more
jthan one or two people walking by my home. The cost does not jUstufy the minimal use it will serve. we!
i are also opposed to teh crub and gutter. PLease leave our tranquil setting as it is. Do not destroy our
! neighborhood. Thank you I
1. f
i =..~:~~r=-=r~~~~~.~~:~::~=-:~.=--.._...- ~..=~..==..~::::==:::.:~===:..::.........=..=:.=:~:=:=..~........:::.:...=======:.:::..::==~~==::=:==:..=.:.:=:=:::...=..::=:..'~..l
i i 1. Sidewalks are unneccesary, traffic will only speed up and increase safety concems; 2. Reducing stree1
jsize (traffic calming) and putting in only curbs will suffice for road improvement; 3. Sidewalks, based on
2885 IREGENT AVE N X : n..umerous studies, often res.. ult in signifi~nt property value reduction 5% -10%; 4. Residents will likely
i be held liable for any accident, injury If there is ice/snow removal delay - despite the city claiming they
I will. keep it clear; 5. Adding sidewalks urbanize our quiet ~igh~rhood. 6. Almost the entire street's I
.... iresldents are adamantly and passionately opposed to haVing sidewalks. ,
!!.~...._~"..._~,...~.. .~--_.....^""',.....f.___._..-...._Ah_..-,___.__~__..__.....____...........:-._'..-__m_...........____....__.~....,.._~..,.__.........:...._,.c,..__.-.~...!
jCOMMENTS FROM 2ND OPEN HOUSE - Where is the data to support the efficancy of repairl
!replacement of homeowner's sanitary sewage pipes on the amount of I & I? Have you seen any data
jfrom any municipality showing more than a slight effecl by replacing these? Much more, the I & I
i problems come from sump pumps and businesses. Increase impervious surfaces will increase 1&1.
i (comments from Cathy) 8' wide sidewalk is absurdly excessive - there are no residential n'hoods where
ithat width is needed. 4-5' Sidewalks are more than adequate. There is no data supporting the decision
!to even put in the sidewalk, much less put in one wide enought to drive a truck down. please consider
! reducing the size of the walk or eliminating it altogether. The city should provide financial incentives. for
1-"-""'2905 "'-'-i'REGENTAVE N ...-.-11.....- 1~~~~S:~:e =.:~~:'~s~ecessary repairs - which will us a lot of $. in a timely mannerl
,......--....... .._-_.~--............. -~=~:~::=:=~==:=~=:~---=~~::~~==:::====1
, 2912 ; REGENT AVE N. . i. j
i-- ""2915'-iREGENTAVE'N'- ..:'==-.......T.--..-l.--..---...-...----.---..--.-----.------....--...-..-.--.--..............-.--....j
.. 2465 ._JREGENT AVE N
2480 iREGENT AVE
l_.. 2485........TREGEN.f"'AVE......
! 2500 iREGENT AVE N
L___
2505
2580
j
iREGENT AVE N
2750
!REGENT AVE N
i
;
!
l....._..~....
t=:~~~.;:=~~::=:l~~~~~.~~ ~ '-"'-i~--- ---- --...------.-----
;.. 2935 I REGENT AVE N x -----YA~:~.sideWalk.mfiiiisbOUieiia-rd....D~~.io.maj~~~~prob~~sin.~~~~~~:~~i~~~~:==:::l
I-=: -'-f=~ -:::"CI====t~~.~':..'=:...":.:::==---=.=:::::=--=~
Ii EVel)'One. on .our block agrees that if we have to have a sidewalk on our side of Regent (west side), we I
! certainly don't want to have a boulevard for the following reasons: 1. Water will be conserved by not
Iwasting it on the sidewalk. 2. Fertilizer will be conserved by not being wasted on the sidewalk. 3. Less I
i maintenance for home owners by having one edge to trim instead of three. 4. Having the sidewalk
x !abutting the curb YAII help keep street salt and sand off the lawn. 5. VWh the sidewalk installed this way,
i it YAII match what Cl)'stal has done beyond our north border. 6. Lastly, if you have a neighbor who
idoesn't care to spend the extra time on a well-kept boulevard, you end up YAth an eye-sore that wall
!passers-by will notice. An improvement that would be especially appreciated at 2945 Regent would be
Ito install a catch basin of some sort that would intercept sand and debris that comes down from the hill 1
: on Triton Drive and collects in front of our driveway all year. I
iAlso, we are .vel)' concerned about keeping the radius of the curb cuts at our driv.eway the same as they I
lare now, and have been, for the past 40 years. If a decision is made to change the radius at the street
loutlet, we need to discuss this YAth the planners. Because of the way our house is situated on our lot, it 1
!would be difficult to~ck our 22-1oot camping trailer (which we keep in the garage) in and out of our I
!driveway if the flare at the street were changed. i
2945
j
iREGENT AVE N
x
H
..~_.~..-.....~.- ......-....-..-.., .
iCOMMENTS FROM 2ND OPEN HOUSE1 - WE have lived here for 40 years and halle neveL.. had a
i problem with our sewer. I saw no problem (no roots, no broken pipe) when the TV camera went throu
! my sewer line but, as per the city report, the contractor said it would cost $5000 to satisfy the cily. As a
i retired city of Minneapolis plumbing inspector of 30 years, I feel these repairs are unnecessal)'. 2 -
!Another thing that concerns us is the 7% administrative fee for repoairs to the first 30 feet of sewer line~
.......... j ......... ._......N....."_...N.~........,......_..___............._..._...__......~.y..~.~.~_._...__....._._......_......"......M.~...,..._...__...._~...._.._........y._._.......__._...._..._.....~'...._.........y.._....__..............._...... ,
!This is anunnecessal)' burden for long-time homeowners like us. The cost of these unneeded repairs is I
1 more than enough for us to pay. In our opinon, the city should only be concemed about illegal drainage I
i into the sewer from sump pumps, ete. 3 - This is a fioow-up note to a letter sent to the Engineering Dept !
ito finish running the sewer line up to the city property line at the lot at 3020 Scott Ave. This would \1
! eliminiate having to open up the new street when a house is built on this lot. 4 - WE have been assured
i by the Consultants and Engineering Dept. that the curb cuts (flares at the end of our driVeway) will be I
i located just as they are now. This is vel)' improtant for us so we can back our travle trailer into the
[garage (where we store it) YAthout going over the grass. 1
--x-'-"lWe wOuld.i?i!~!~:!!j9.E-::y~~J~li.!i.l;!!~ig;=~.~Q.i!lJ?P.Q!!-':!~Y.!.~Il~~d~~;:=::==:::.:::::~:=:~:::~:=:j
l
,My w~an~~:e und:~I~to a~~~;::-~;-;::~~~reg::i~ skjewalks akln~;;~~;~~:::~-]
i Our opinion is that we would like to see a sidewalk with a strip of grass between it and the street. It I
x 1 looks.better in the summer and provideS a place for snow storage during the YAnter. Thanks. Toni and ;
! David Peters - 3005 Regent Ave N /I comments from 2nd open house - I am ok YAth putting sidewalks
lalong Regent but not ok YAth an 8 ft walk. It distracts from the "neighborhood" look & takes too much
19reen area out of aU the yards. Please consider a 6' walk like the one on G.V. road near the golfcourse.
1......301"4.... ....IREGENTAVE N I m ..........1.....-..............-.......-..... ....... .........m......m................ ........_.._.m_.................................m.m..'.........................--....
l..._...__n............~__.-.-.-..,..............._.._. .n_...~...._...;;._.........mR.~"_.~_:._____~_~..n...__......<.._......__....,-,-,~__,,,,,,,,,,,,_,_,,_'~_"'''_'____''''''''''''''''_'.__.......__....~..........~__......_.. .................,.~n............h....
r ~~ . l::~~~~ ~~ ~ +---l ------
. ., .. __ __ ....._...._~...........~.j___...._....._...__....~~._~..~._...~__....._.....___.._.._."........_.........-....~y_._...__...._;_.............______yy. ._.__...__.._._H.Y........_.._,......_.._~....~_._...m.__.__..__..y._.._...~..~.._..__......._.....
1.:::::J*I.~::.:]~~g~~..~~-~~===~lt:=:-::::=:=:J.=:~:.::=~::J==.:=.....==:.==:....===.====..==.=.=:::=-=:=.=:===.:==:.=:~:=-.....__.:::::=:=.._:..=~~~=..:.:.~.":=:':._
! 3206 !REGENT AVE N J!
, 3211 iREGENT AVE N l
r .....--..--..j.---.--------.-........... '-'-...'."-'1"'-..'-'.-'
;
!REGENT AVE N I
i
[----.- 295s'.-'."IREGENT"JWEN---".
L_:~~::=TREGENT~VE'N_..
i i
x
3005
;
;
iREGENTAVEN
;
j
x
I don't ttiiiika'Sldewa"ii< 8 feet widels necessary:.fCiOn'tkOOw whOSeWlld ideathat"was, bi,thlbiiiniiey'!
don't live on Regent. I'd go for a 4 or 5 foot sidewalk (Wide) As far as sewer and drainage, I've had no I
serious problems. I look forward to a less bumpy street - as "m sure evel)'one living on or near regent I
,.~__.___.____._..._.._.__.....___.__.._.__...".__.....~_...._.......____.__......__mo......,.........._.._._._....._. .._..........._......!
3220
I
r-~"""
3221
;
I REGENT AVE N
[In regards to the sidewalk on Regent ave. I orefer not to have a sidewalk- especially a 8 foot sidewalk.
iMain streets - bus Lines - Can funtion with 4 foot sidewalks. ApparenUy the 2 petitions that circulated
x !earlier have been ignored. Also. in regards to the sewer project, we have tried to cooperate by digging
! up our basement floor and yard. But now a expensive line is suggested, As senior citizens living YAth
i cancer and stroke this will wipe out our savings. This whole project is a extreme hardship on many
! senior residents.
........._~.;_.--~~
~~~~~~~~
. 32301REGENTAVEN
~:.==~.?~1..=:=:J~2.~.~T.~~E:=:=:=:
; 3240 iREGENT AVE N
t--.. 3241"--lREGENT AVE N ---
j
r-
!
i 3249
!
!
iREGENT AVE N
x
!______31.OO ~AVE ~q=l
!.~:::j~1~____,:~~~~~.~::~==jL=:=::t .
3320
iREGENT AVE N
;
j
;
! i
t~= ~JaFt-=r=t X
i=~"-'!!==I~:=l!====r
3345
"-3348
iREGENTAVE N
VEN
,REGEt!! AVE N _..._
iREGENT AVE N
iREGENT AVE N
i
x
L~.!:.~
i
.
Is the hill on the north side of our lot. Our garage and driveway are approximately 6'
xtrOm street. The grade of the hill is steep. Will some sort of retaining wall be needed? And if so, are
we able to help decide how it looks? [photos included]
have been hospitalized and not home until lately, 1st of all I'm against a sidewalk. I moved out of the
cities to get away from all this. 2. Regent Ave does not need a sidewalk. 3. Regent Ave Is wider than a
great of an street in Golden Valley. \Mlat is wrong with the present street width? Ig it Is for dog walks.
they can take the dogs to the park. Are the residents going to belaxed earch year for G.V, to plow the
Who will pay for the up keep of the sidewalk? Being damaged by lawn mowers and city snow
plows (like my front yard) Thank you fo repairing my lawn each year. I have nop problem with garabge
! cans In my driveway. A 4 foot sidewalk Is steader size and the size is appropiate for the cause.
"
i
.
.
.
."
5EP 4 2007
9-4-2007
Dear Mayor Loomis and Cily Council Members, a f \ LE
As 17 year residents at 24XX Regent Ave. N, we are concerned with the proposed
sidewalk project for 2008. We moved here to enjoy' suburbia' on the edge of the city of
Minneapolis.
At a recent city council meeting there was an overwhelming vote (48:5) by the Regent
Ave. neighbors NOT to have this 8 foot sidewalk implemented. We want our community
to be a proud one where our government listens to its people compared to overall apathy
nationally.
We respect the desire to improve accessibility for people with needs, our park system and
general street improvements. We believe widening the street and putting in a sidewalk
that is 8 feet wide is totally unnecessary. We do not want to have cars and pedestrians
encroaching into our yard. Existing natural beauty is another concern. Our street has
beautiful established trees and gardens that will need to be removed to do this project.
It is also stated that the city wHI remove the snow from our sidewalks. We have lived in
S1. Paul, Minneapolis and S1. Louis Park. Sidewalks were NEVER shoveled during the
winter. How can we believe that Golden Valley will do this and in a timely manner?
Who is liable if a walker slips on sidewalk ice in front of our home?
The proposal to widen the street on each side will only make Regent Ave. a faster
speedway than it is already. When Blair Tremere was Mayor, we worked with him
and other neighbors to push for stop signs at Westbend and Hampton Roads to slow the
traffic that sped toward the stop sign at Gearty Park. When people walk, bike, skate, etc.
on the street we see vehicles slow down. Why not identify a walking/biking path in the
street like on the west side of Noble Ave?
8 feet wide is excessive. We have heard stories about a wheel chair, walker and car door
converging at one time, justifying the need for an 8 foot wide sidewalk. Why is that
necessary? Why can 'tpeople move to the side, or wait their turn?
Have there been accidents to justify this project? Not on our block in the past 17 years.
Where will the money come from to fund this project? We want to see morejustification
for this project other than "it was proposed years ago and needs to proceed".
Please keep Golden Valley government a city by & for the people.
Tami Smith and Stephen Elias
Aron and Jacob
Regent Ave. Residents
Regent Rascal Neighborhood Community Watch Group
Dana and Joleen Perkins
2021 Regent Ave N.
RFr.'{) NO \I 20 2.007
We live at the lot adjacent to the wooded area, South of West bend Ave. OnNovember
13th, the City staff showed my wife and I several proposals for the City's plans to
"Develop" that wooded lot.
The Proposals are:
I) Leave Westbend where it is now located, North of me wooded lot, and develop
the wooded area into a wooded pond area. (The new bike trail would nm along
the north side of Westbend with this plan.)
2) Remove Westbend and route the new 8 foot wide asphalt bike trail along our
property line.
3) Move Westbend, so it runs along our property line, on the South side of the
woods.
Option one is the only proposal that is environmentally and fiscally acceptable.
The front of our property is already going to be ruined by ~m 8 foot asphalt path. We
opposed this sidewalk plan, as do the majority ofthe resident<i living along Regent
Avenue. To add a second trail, or worse yet. a road, on theNorth side of our propeliy is
grossly unjust!
When we purchased this property twelve years ago, we were drawn 10 the natural fec.1 of
the yard and that it isn't a corner lot. To be forced to live on a lot with streets running
on three sides of our property will destroy the natural beauty, and the value of the house.
We fought to preserve these same woods in 2001 . At thattime, we submitted a petition
with 100's of names from all over the neighborhood to protect the woods. (That petition
is a matter of public record.)
Once again the City is attacking this neighborhood, first by forcing a ridiculously wide
sidewalk on everyone, and now by focusing the destruction on the handful of neighbors
that surround the wooded Jot by Westhend.
We used to love our property and have great pride in it and our neighborhood. Now wC'
only wish to leave this house and this City. The City is determined to destroy the homes it
taxes and return the land to a wetland.
Atthe conclusion ofthe meeting I asked that the City consider another option. Buy ou/'
house and destroy it, with the trees; You'll gain that much more land for asphalt and
wetlands.
Dana and JOleen. ~ pen<e.rk'i-i ._
~.qt-~
763-521-4533
~
Dana and loteen Perkins
2021 Regent Ave N.
RFr.'n NO V 2 0 2.007
We live at the lot adjacent to the wooded area, South of Westbend Ave. On November
13th, the City staff showed my \\-ife and I several proposals for the City's plans to
.'Develop" that wooded lot.
The Proposals are:
]) Leave Westbend where it is now located, North of the wooded lot, and develop
the wooded area into a wooded pond area. (The new bike trail would run along
the north side of West bend with this plan.)
2) Remove Westbend and route the new 8 foot wide asphalt bike trail along our
property line. '
3) Move Westbend, so it runs along our property line, on the South side of the
woods. '
Option one is the only proposal that is environmentally and fiscally aCCel)table.
The front of our property is already going to be ruined by an 8 foot asphalt path. W t:
opposed this sidewalk plan, as do the majority of the residents living along Regent
A venue. To add a second trail, or worse yet, a road, on the North side of our properly is
grossly unjust!
When we purchased this property t\velve years ago. we were drawn 10 the natural fed of
the yard and that it isn't a corner lot. To be forced to Jive on a lot with streets running
on three sides of our property wilJ destroy the natural beauty, and the value of the house.
We. fought to preserve these same woods in 200]. At that time, we submitted a petition
with 1 00' s of names from all over the neighborhood to protect the. woods. (That petit ion
is a matter of public record.)
Once again the City is attacking this neighborhood, first by forcing a ridiculously wide
sidewalk on everyone, and now by focusing the destruction on the handful of ne'ighbor~
that surround the wooded lot by Westbend.
We used to love our property and have great pride in it and our neighborhood. Now we
only wish to leave this house and this City. The City is determined to destroy the homes it
taxes and return the land to a wetland.
At the conclusion of the meeting I ac;;ked that the City consider another option. Buy our
house and destroy it, with the trees. You'll gain that much more land for asphalt and
wetlands.
Dana and Ja.leen ~er~ "
~q-~
763-521-4533
~
~ {)O g -0 qf2 M.,1
Gena M. Gerard
S050 Baisett Creek Drive
Golden VaDey,.MN 5542.2.
August 27,2007
ftC1J huG 29 2007
Mayor Linda Loomis and City Council Members
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Dear Mayor Loomis and Council Members,
I am writing to commend Golden Valley for developing repavement plans for Regent Avenue that include
a sidewalk south of Culver Road. My husband Mike Schommer and I have lived at the corner of Regent
and Bassett Creek Drive since 2003 and have been following the rehabilitation plans these past 4 years.
I understand there has been some resident opposition to the plan, and even a potential petition against it.
We would like city leaders and planners to know that this sentiment is. not universally held,.as most
neighbors we have talked to in fact support sidewalks to make our community more walkable, neighborly,
and child-friendly. Attendance at the July 11 neighborllood meeting may have disproportionately
represented the opposition, in that people who favor the sidewalk plan had little reason to attend. . We
have two preschool children who cannot bikeltrike, take a walk, or access playgrounds in our
neighborllood due to the lack of sidewalks, so we m.ve a vested interest in this essential improvement. . In
fact, we are even considering leaving Golden Valley and moving elsewhere so that we and our children
can have greater mobility, opportunities for exercise, and chances to meet and greet neighbors.
It bas come to our attention that plans for a sidewalk connecting Regent to Noble Avenue along Culver
Road may be tabled. lam writing with a particular request that the city instead connect Regent to Noble
with a sidewalk along Bassett Creek Drive for these reasons:
1. There is heavy traffic to and from Valley of Peace Lutheran Church located on this stretch of
Bassett Creek Driye, with rush hour drop-offs and pick-ups by SO families whose children attend
the church's child care program Monday through Friday. Church-related traffic in the evening
includes weeknight Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, Boy Scout meetings, music classes, and
church groups. On weekends, the church draws traffic for Saturday and Sunday services.
2. Quail Avenue and Perry Avenue add to the traffic impact on this .section of Bassett Creek Drive
because both of these streets dead-end on Bassett Creek, which is the only.tboroughfare for south-
bound drivers: As . illustrated on the map below, Quail and Perry drivers must use Bassett Creek
to reach Noble or Regent going south toward Duluth/Highway 100 or Golden Valley
RoadIMinneapolis. The reverse is also true as people return to homes on Quail and Perry going
north on Regent or Noble; they have no choice but to drive on this stretch ofBasseU Creek.
3. There is a bus stop for school children at the southeast comer of Bassett Creek Drive and Regent.
This is a very busy. intersection for the reasons described above, but it has neither.a stop sign nor
a sidewalk. Although a traffic study of this intersection has not been done, according to tbecity
engineer, I believe a study is warranted to review the public safetY need for both a sidewalk and a
stop sign. The heavy usage of this t-intersection without a stop sign, combined with a major blind
spot facing south (a hill on Regent), has produced many Close calls, leaving skid marks ten feet
across our lawn, skid marks. on our neighbor's lawn (requiring professional services for lawn
repair), arid broken headlamps on our property. The children who use this bus stop would be
safer if they had a sidewalk to reach their stop and a safe location to wait.
Thank you for your consideration of this request, and thank you for producing plans for public comment.
We are happy to see Golden Valley moving in this direction. If you wish to speak with me directly, I can
be reached at 763-522-6112. .
Ac<-~
Gena Gerard
Golden Valley Resident
: MAPavt ~1.
t!
Mcsr~ In ViI
w
i
~
t1l
Z
Hampton Rd
St'littWCOd
Natf.lreAfeCi
c:
=-
"
~
IJ
2
,,'lie
.,..,.l\1AtJi
. ~ Of
.".....to ('3Pi
Cl2PO? MapOuest Inc.
cc: Sidewalk Committee
Jeannine Clancy
Tom Burton
~1--
z
l
..;;
f
0'
I
l
z
f
..
Ii
z ..t
~
t
.t)
~ #
,~
2-
J'
>-
I
\
.:!r
&
oq'
I
.lIIm
· 3IID ft
"'arle Ln oJ
tiiirnpti.vl
Hem
. . ~. A..__ . ..
- ... ... .. ~.. C1eE
V_of~
,CIIan:II tI;
'ADOod'.
ChiIdreD '
LeemiDa CeDter
"'!lnc.)' RcIg
i
B.
)lo
'<
II>
Z
Or~"'ay ~
I
IJ
r
:2
~\
-I
:,
C 200?NAVfEQ
Page 1 of2
Oliver, Jeff
..-................,..-...~....._....""'"....""""....._.._,_. ._...._.."....................<-........-........~,..,-~............"'",."'-....- ......--.._..._.....,:--.__......,(..._........_.._.......~_......--.",...-.-,..--..................--.............-..............--...."..,..'--.-..-....-........-.........-.....-"'.-,....."...-"'---.............--
From: Clancy, Jeannine
Sent: Tuesday, July 24,2007 5:18 PM
To: Freiberg, Mike
Cc: Eckman, Eric; Columbus, Christine;'mkotila@sehinc.com'; Oliver, Jeff
Subject: RE: Regent Avenue Sidewalks
Hello Mike:
The traffic committee will review his concemsabout speed. His comments about the sidewalk will be forwarded
on the sidewalk committee.
Jeannine Clancy
Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Phone: 763.593.8035
Fax: 763.593.3988
TTY: 763.593.3968
Email: jclancy@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
__:............................_... ...............______..._...___.............._. ....M.................._............. ......._.................._.................. ...C'..-......-.--....-.........--..-.._.._..................__.......__........_....M.......P._........._._.M.......,P....M.._.............._".. .P....._.~.._.___..._.._.___..~..._._._'.."._m...H._____.._~.... ..._-..-... ..
From: Freiberg, Mike
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:06 AM
To: Clancy, Jeannine
Subject: FW: Regent Avenue Sidewalks
Jeannine: This resident has some recommendations about changing the dimensions of the proposed sidewalk on
Regent so that it is narrower. Could you forward this to the Sidewalk Committee so that they consider not only
whether there should be a sidewalk, but what the dimensions of it should be if there should be one? Also, he
raised some concerns with traffic on Regent. Is this something the Traffic Committee could consider? Thanks in
advance.
Mike Freiberg
Golden Valley City Council
..........~......_M._ _....... ..~_.___.. ........_..~.... ~"_....H._..".~.._..... ....__... ._...._H...~M~_..".~...H_..........._..._. ....H...... ._........ .....,...._.. "'M. ... ....H."."..._.'. .......... .. ..._...."..._.............."................-_._..__.....__._..".._..... ..M" .... ._........"...._...._.."..............._...~..........".""..H_.__"........-...'-."...--.. .--,..~........
From: Fitzsimmons, Jim [mailto:frt:zsimm@BIWORLDWIDE.com]
Sent: Thu 7/12/200711:40 AM
To: Freiberg, Mike
Subject: Regent Avenue Sidewalks
Mike,
My family and I (Spouse-Debbie, Children-Andrew, Sofie, Steven and William) are residents at 2201 Regent, an
area slated for new sidewalks in 2009. As you know, the city is presenting a plan that is asking us to go from
no sidewalks to an 8-footwide piece of concrete right across aU the front lawns of dozens of homes on the west
part of Regent. The sidewalk would possibly eradicate two 70 foot tall Colorado Spruce trees right in the front of
my yard that help define the look of our block.
I am certain one of the reasons you selected your home in Golden Valley is the unobtrusive and peaceful
environment.
Just imagine how you would feel if a committee was telling you that you are possibly losing two of your tallest
trees-right in front of your house and they are pouring a massive slab of concrete in its place. Sounds dreamy I
doesn't it?
Oliver. Jeff
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Columbus, Christine
Monday, July 23, 2007 1 :39 PM
Oliver, Jeff
FW to Jeff Oliver - Sidewalk on Regent Ave North
-----Original Message-----
From: Weiler, Cheryl On Behalf Of Cityhall
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 12:39 PM
To: Columbus, Christine
Cc: Weiler, Cheryl
Subject: FW: Sidewalk on Regent Ave North
-----Original Message-----
From: sandy.M.Johnson@co.hennepin.mn.\ls [mailto:Sandy.M.Johnson@co.hennepin.mn.us]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 12:40 PM
To: Cityhall
Subject: Sidewalk on Regent Ave North
I attended the meeting in the Council Chambers on 7/11.
I want it noted that I DO NOT want a sidewalk on Regent Ave N.
I live at 2285 Regent Ave N
Sandy Johnson
sandy.johnson@Co.hennepin.mn.us
Benefits Unit - Human Resources
Mail Code: 070
Benefits Intranet Site
612-348-3766
Fax: 612-348-9638
http://www.hennepin.us/
1
Page 2 of2
As I discussed with Ms. Clancy last night, I am not against sidewalks at all. I grew up in Chicago where
sidewalks were a path to the rest of your block. I feel that toot traffic on our block is severely impeded (especially
in Winter) due to lack of sidewalk. I am certain a smooth path for wheelchairs would be great. But to go from
nothing to this 8-toot wide strip of cement is too much!
The CitY needs to go back and rethink this proposal and come up with something that better suits the
neighborhood. How about 5-foot sidewalks? It would be more cost effective and based on the low amount
otpedestrian traffic already, would be more that adequate to handle the expected traffic. I am not asking for no
sidewalks, just a better plan.
In addition, how about a plan for the street that would incorporate some speed reducing measure tor the street.
At the open house a month ago, reference was made by members representing Golden Valley that certain things
could. be done to help reduce speed of traffic. However at last nighfs meeting, nothing like this was detailed. The
design firm seemed surprised by this type of request.
I thank you for listening and hope that you can understand my concerns and those of our neighbors. Please vote
no on the Regent Sidewalk plan as it now stands and come back with a new, better plan!
James Fitzsimmons
2201 Regent Avenue North
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
763-521-7121
This e-mail message is being sent solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by phone or reply bye-mail, delete the original
message and destroy all copies. Thank you.
Page 2 of3
From: aaney, Jeannine
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:52 AM
To: 'Fitzsimmons, Jim'
Cc: Altonen, Staey; Johnson, Roger
Subject: RE: Regent Avenue Sidewalks
Jim:
Thanks for your email. As you noted, we will continue to work on a design which limits the impacts of the
sidewalk on the improvements located within the right of way. All of the ideas that you listed will be considered.
Your participation in th~ process has been helpful and appreciated.
I will send your email on to our Police Department staff. Please feel free to contact the Police Department directly
as they will know first hand about their efforts to address the neighborhood's concern regarding speed on Regent.
Sincerely,
Jeannine Clancy
Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Phone: 763.593.8035
Fax: 763.593.3988
TOO: 763.593.3968
~,____,,,,,-,,-,---'-~'~~'-'__""M"_'_"~'~"."_""h"'_""-',,,,._~.~_..~.......,.~_.__ .h._Hh......MNH.....__..,.._~~.b.M.....__.._w__.________
From: Fitzsimmons,. Jim [mailto:fitzsimm@BIWORlDWIDE.com]
sent: Friday, August 03,200711:15 AM
To: aaney, Jeannine; Freiberg, Mike; Loomis, Linda
Cc: debfitzavs@earthlink.net
Subject: Regent Avenue Sidewalks
Thanks for your time and energy all of you have put into this project to date. Although I still would have preferred
no sidewalks, (purely selfish), I can definitely live with sidewalks on Regent if we all work toward a compromise
on:
1.Si dewalk Width
2.Cent ering of the Mass
3.Lim iting tree loss.
I was a little taken aback when Linda began the meeting with the admonishments of the audience and tactics
used to get what the homeowners wanted. It's funny isn't it that the group who used those tactics (assuming it
was the Culver group) got exactly what they wanted (no sidewalks), and the less verbal group (Regent) was much
less talked about during the meeting and wound up getting sidewalks. Hmmm, what does that say?
Anyway, I think the decisions last night were solid and I look forward to seeing the revised plans in October.
PS...Don't forget to remind the GVPD about the enforcement of the speed limit on Regent. As the one sidewalk
committee member stated "I went to see Regent and Culver regarding the proposed plans and had two separate
cars tailgate me on Regent, and I was going the speed Iimitl" If you need our help in making this case to the PO,
please tell me and we can start doing something to help justify Cildditional enforcement.
Thanks again.
Page 1 of 1
Columbus, Christine
"'--~---'_._"""""'._---------------..~_.".--y_.__..
'-~--~--------
(I: r~ ,
Ct.. ()'l h: t
Ii JI'.t
From: Clancy, Jeannine
Sent: Tuesday, September 18,200712:25 PM
To: Columbus, Christine
Cc: Oliver, Jeff
Subject: RE: comment on Regent Ave Sidewalk.
Thanks Christine. Please put in the comment file for this project. All of these comments will need to be part of
the feasibility report.
Jeannine Clancy
Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Phone: 763.593.8035
Fax: 763.593.3988
TOO: 763.593.3968
From: Columbus, Christine
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 10:56 AM
To: Clancy, Jeannine
Subject: comment on Regent Ave Sidewalk.
September 18,2007 at 10:50 AM - Shelly Rausch of 4840 West Bend Road called and said she was thrilled
about a sidewalk on Regent Ave N., she has two small children and worries about the safety of not only her
children but everyone else kids as well.. Regent Ave N., is a very busy street and with the hill she feels walking on
the road is unsafe. She also believes that the connection to Scheid Park will benefit everyone.
SEP 4 2007
9-4-2007
Pear Mayor Loomis and City Council Members, 0 Fl . E
As 17 year residents at 24XX Regent Ave. N, we are concerned with the proposed
sidewalkproject for 2008. We moved here to enjoy 'suburbia' on the edge of the city of
Minneapolis.
At a recent city council meeting there was an overwhelming vote (48:5) by the Regent
Ave. neighbors NOT to have this 8 foot sidewalk implemented. We want our community
to be a proud one where our government listens to its people compared to overall apathy
nationally.
We respect the desire to improve accessibility for people with needs, our park system and
general street improvements. We believe widening the street and putting in a sidewalk
that is 8 feet wide is totally unnecessary. We do not want to have cars and pedestrians
encroaching into our yard. Existing natural beauty is another concern. OUf street has
beautiful established trees and gardens that will need to be removed to do this project.
It is also stated that the city will remove the snow from our sidewalks. We have lived in
St. Paul, Minneapolis and St. Louis Park. Sidewalks were NEVER shoveled during the
winter. How can we believe that Golden Valley will do this and ina timely manner?
Who is liable if a walker slips on sidewalk ice in front of our home?
The proposal to widen the street on each side wiJI only make Regent Ave. a faster
speedway than it is already. When Blair Tremere was Mayor, we worked with him
and other neighbors to push for stop signs at Westbend and Hampton Roads to slow the
traffic that sped toward the stop sign at Gearty Park. When people walk, bike,skate, etc.
on the street we see vehicles slow down. Why not identify a walking/biking path in the
street like on the west side of Noble Ave?
8 feet wide is excessive. We have heard stories about a wheelchair, walker and car door
converging at one time, justifying the need for an 8 foot wide sidewalk. Why is that
necessary? Why can't people move to the side, or wait their turn?
Have there been accidents to justify this project? Not on our block in the past 17 years.
Where will the money come from to fund this project? We want to see more justification
for this project other than "it was proposed years ago and needs to proceed".
Please keep Golden Valley government a city by & for the people.
Tami Smith and Stephen Elias
Aron and Jacob
Regent Ave. Residents
Regent Rascal Neighborhood Community Watch Group
Oliver, Jeff
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
City hall
Friday, July 13, 200710:56 AM
Oliver, Jeff; Clancy. Jeannine
FW: Regent Avenue Sidewalks -- Clarification?
From the city web site.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Westray [mailto:ianwestray@comcast.netJ
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:31 AM
To: Cityhall
Subject: Regent Avenue Sidewalks -- Clarification?
Hello Public Works person,
My name's Ian Westray, and I attended the Regent Avenue neighborhood sidewalk meeting last
night. Can I ask for a simple clarification?
I think we heard, at the start of the meeting, that the width of the added sidewalks would
essentially be shared between the two sides of the street. A~ I understand that, it would
mean that (for example) an additional 11-foot sidewalk area would wind up moving 5 1/2
feet into the right of way on both the east and the west sides of the street.
The street would be moved over to even things out, essentially. Is that correct? Or does
the right of way system essentially require that all the space be taken up on one side?
Just for the record, I was one of the five "for" votes at the meeting, and upon reflection
I'm even more convinced that the objections last night were quite disp~oportionate. (I'm
just trying to do the math, here, on how many feet closer to our picture windows potential
criminals have to be in order to case our houses more easily and spark a wave of
burglaries. Is it 11 feet, or only 5 1.2?
If we narrowed the street itself, would that cut crime? Or what assertion was being made,
exactly, implicit to that first objection?)
Thanks,
Ian Westray
2160 Regent
1
Page 1 of2
Clancy, Jeannine
From: Ian Westray [ianwestray@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 2:22 PM
To: Clancy, Jeannine
Cc: Oliver, Jeff; Sue Mason
Subject: Re: Regent Avenue Sidewalks
Thanks folks,
I appreciate the response.
-- Ian Westray
On Jul13, 2007, at 1 :53 PM, Clancy, Jeannine wrote:
All of these comments need to be included in the Feasibility report.
Jeannine Clancy
Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Phone: 763.593.8035
Fax: 763.593.3988
TTY: 763.593.3968
Email: iclancy@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
From: Oliver, Jeff
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1: 11 PM
To: lanwestra~mcast.I1~J;
Cc: Oancy, Jeannine; Sue Mason
Subject: Regent Avenue Sidewalks
Ian:
Page 2 of2
Your e-mail the City of Golden Valley web site was referred to the Public Works Department for response.
Thank you for your participation in the Regent Avenue sidewalk discussion. One of the alternatives that is available is
moving the street and sidewalk to be centered within the street right-of-way. We call this practice acentering the mass.,
We have used this method on in the past and found it to be an effective compromise with the property owners. City staff
will continue to work on the preliminary design of this project and it is likely that the process will include additional
neighborhood meetings to discuss the potential design of the project.
Please feel free to call me if you have any additional questions regarding this project.
Jeff Oliver, PE
City Engineer
City of Golden Valley
Phone: 763.593.8034
Fax: 763.593.3988
e-mail: ioliver@cLgolden-valley.mn.us
Clancy, Jeannine
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Pentel, Paula
Friday, July 13,20075:56 PM
Clancy, Jeannine
FW: Regent Avenue Sidewalks
Paula Pentel
Golden Valley City Council
paula.pentel@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
763-593-8001
-----Original Message-----
From: Fitzsimmons, Jim [mailto.: fitzsimm@BIWORLDWIDE.com]
Sent: Thu 7/12/2007 11:27 AM
To: Pentel, Paula
Subject: Regent Avenue Sidewalks
Paula,
My family and I (Spouse--Debbie, Children--Andrew, Sofie, Steven and
William) are residents at 2201 Regent, an area slated for new sidewalks in 2009.
know in your own neighborhood, sidewalks are not currently part of the landscape.
you know, the city is presenting a plan that is asking uS to go from no sidewalks
8-foot wide piece of concrete right across all the front lawns of dozens of
homes on the west part of Regent. The sidewalk would possibly
eradicate two 70 foot tall Colorado Spruce trees right in the front of my yard that help
define the look of our block.
As you
And as
to an
Because you are on the sidewalk committee and have okayed the direction to date, I can
only hope you didn't check the plans to see the impact the sidewalks would make in our
neighborhood. I am certain one of the reasons you selected your home in Golden Valley is
the unobtrusive and peaceful environment. You are surrounded by trees--no sidewalk.
Just imagine how you would feel if a committee was telling you that you are possibly
losing two of your tallest trees--right in front of your house and they are pouring a
massive slab of concrete in its place.
Sounds dreamy, doesn't it?
As I discussed with Ms. Clancy last night, I am not against sidewalks at all. I grew up
in Chicago where sidewalks were a path to the rest of your block. I feel that foot
traffic on our block is severely impeded (especially in Winter) due to lack of sidewalk. I
am certain a
smooth path for wheelchairs would be great. But to go from nothing to
this 8-foot wide strip of cement is too much!
The City needs to go back and rethink this proposal and come up with something that better
suits the neighborhood. How about 5-foot sidewalks? It would be more cost effective and
based on the low amount of pedestrian traffic already, would be more that adequate to
handle the
expected traffic. I am not asking for no sidewalks like you have in
your neighborhood, justa better plan.
In addition, how about a plan for the street that would incorporate some speed reducing
measure for the street. At the open house a month ago, reference was made by members
representing Golden Valley that certain things could be done to help reduce speed of
traffic. However at last night's meeting, nothing like this was detailed. The design
firm seemed surprised by this type of request.
I thank you for listening and hope that you can understand my concerns and those of our
1
neighbors. Please vote no on the Regent Sidewalk plan as it now stands and come back with
a new, better plan!
James Fitzsimmons
2201 Regent Avenue North
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
763-521-7121
This e-mail message is being sent solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intende~ recipient, please contact the
sender by phone or reply bye-mail, delete the original message and destroy all copies.
Thank you.
2
Page 1 of2
Oliver, Jeff
From: Comcast. net Ucahow@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 20072:21 AM
To: Clancy, Jeannine; Oliver, Jeff; smason@sehinc.com
Cc: Loomis, Linda; Freiberg, Mike; Pentel, Paula; Scanlon, DeDe; Shaffer, Bob
Subject: Regent Sidewalk Proposal Meeting Followup and Observations
I first want to thank you for inviting me to the meeting about the new Sidewalk Proposals on Regent Avenue North
which took place on Wednesday night July 11, 2007 at City Hall. I think you have some wonderful ideas to
improve the safety and quality of my immediate area even if the majority of the meeting attendees did nothing but
complain about perceived costs and impacts and try to shut those Sidewalk Proposals down.
I wanted you to know that I was disturbed (but not surprised) by the wanton lack of short and long term insight
that most oUhe attendees showed. It seemed that most people that attended were the ones that were going to
be directly effected by the sidewalk placement and wanted it anywhere but in their yards or did not want one at
all. Alot of unsubstantiated claims and figures (lower property values, lessened local security, more yard
maintenance, lack of use) were brought forth by attendees which only made the situation worse. It seemed that
the sponsors of the meeting lacked substantial answers to some of the questions asked regarding pedistrian use
studies, similar sidewalks in other cities, possible property value changes, which might have alleviated the
situation somewhat.
I was the only one (other than the meeting sponsors) who spoke in favor of the sidewalk proposals and tried to
point out that most the points priorly made by attendees were just not experienced in my 30 years of priorly living
in heavily used sidewalked South Minneapolis (where the sidewalks are even narrower). I tried to make clear that
these proposed sidewalks would be there long after most of the people in the room had moved or died and that
the neighborhood was transitioning from the older original families to newer ones, many with younger children.
On a personal note my father now requires a walker to get around and uses the sidewalks in his South
Minneapolis area daily to go for walks so they benefit older individuals as well,
I live at 4980 Sorell Avenue North which is just one block North of the Scheid Park and I see many children now
riding their bikes in the street on the way there or parents pushing baby carriages. It is also dangerous in the
Winter with no sidewalk as you are forced to walk up Regent in the dark at night due to the snow on both sides of
the street. There are also numerous children who go sledding at the park in the Winter and drag their sleds up
the street.
I have lived in Golden Valley at this residence for 20 years and was surprised when I moved in that we did not
have a sidewalk on at least one side of the street already with the traffic levels Regent experiences. I always fully
expected that someday the streets in this area would be redone and that and that a sidewalk on Regent would be
added at that time and have no pity for those that want the world to stand still.
I am sorry that a more balanced attendence of the area was not present at the R,egent Sidewalk Proposal
meeting. Although I am sure that there are strong feeling by many whose yards would be directly effected (they
referenced a Stop the Sidewalk petition) I am sure that if a wider area was polled you would find other families (off
Regent itself) that would appreciate a sidewalk to use year around in their area.
The vote some attendees wanted to take showing a large lack of support for the Sidewalk Proposals is highly
dubious at best due to: 1) selected nature of the meeting attendees (people who had issues mainly attended), 2)
that no effort was made to identify household residents (multiple people from the same residence voted negative),
3) open voting requirement (which due to negitivity of the environment probably scared some people from
expressing their true opinion), 4) unsubstantiated prior statements which could have biased the vote (scare
tactics), 5) limited base of attendees (limited or no off Regent residents),
I hope in the future that the entire area gets involved in these Sidewalk Proposal meetings (it was never made
clear how many people were actually invited to this specific meeting or from what general locations (how far off
Regent itself where many users would live). I think you will find support for these Sidewalk and Trail Proposals
will rise dramatically if you get away from the people whose yards are directly effected. Everyone does not have
such limited point of view or foresight as many of the meeting attendees had.
Page 2 of2
I would like to think that our elected Golden Valley officials look out for the entire city and try to do what is best for
the most people even if they have to make some locally unpopular decisions. I am a big supporter of the areas
Trial systems and just want to reiterate that I along with some of my less vocal neighbors think it would be a wise
decison to have a sidewalk on Regent Avenue North. I am not sure of the exact type of sidewalk that should be
present but I think something should be done and now is the time.
I really want to stress that I think the whole Regent Sidewalk Proposal issue for my location also really needs to
be highly tied to the restructuring of the comer of Duluth and Regent by Scheid Park. Installing a sidewalk up to
this comer is only going to make a bad situation worse as there is no easy way to currently cross this street using
the existing pedistrian bridge for wheeled traffic or gain access to bridge from the existing bus stop. I know
Golden Valley is looking at this situation as well from prior conversions with the people at your sponsored
meetings and I look forward to some future meeting on this subject.
Please let me know if I can help in any way to create a better designed local Sidewalk or Trail system.
Jay H Cahow
4980 Sorell Avenue North
Golden Valley, MN 55422-4138
763-522-4581 (Home)
612-432-9998 (Cell)
Regent Avenue Neighborhood Meeting
July 11, 2007
6:30pm - 8:30 pm
.:. Welcome & Overview
.:. Presentations
.:. Questions & Concerns
.:. Summary/Conclusion
Introduction
Bonnie Morey - Facilitator
Jeff Oliver - City Engineer
Mike Kotila - Transportation Engineer
Sue Mason - Project Engineer
AI Lundstrom - Environmental Coordinator, City Forester
Jeannine Clancy.- Public Works Director
Questions/Concerns
.:. How to replace mature shrubs that provide a buffer (lilacs that provide
privacy?)
Response: Staff discussed the City's tree and shrub replacement program
if impacts to existing landscaping cannot be avoided.
.:. This new sidewalk will change my privacy/security - people can see in my
windows.
.:. How much will this increase pedestrians and vehicle traffic?
Response: It is the City's experience that once a walk is constructed, it will
be used, but we cannot predict the number of users. There will not be an
increase in the number of cars due to the presence of a sidewalk.
.:. Why are six-foot sidewalks necessary? Walk on two sides (bike
commuter)?
Response: One of the reasons is to accommodate the City's snow
removal equipment, which is five feet wide, therefore minimizing damage
to lawns. The six foot.width also provides additional space when users are
passing.
.:. Are you recommending six-foot walks for bikers also?
Response: The six foot width is for all users, including bikers who may use
the sidewalk. Most serious bicyclists will use the roadways and not the
sidewalk, most likely bike users on sidewalk are children.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1 )\Regent Ave\Regent Ave Neighborhood Mtg 071107 .doc
.:. Does City have studies about potential pedestrian traffic? Ped and bike
counts?
Response: There is no study projecting the number of users, or any
counts of existing pedestrians in the area.
.:. Why not offer a lower cost proposal to residents; not do the sidewalk?
Waste of money without knowing.
Response: The special assessment to property owners represents
approximately 20% of the total cost to reconstruct the street, and does not
include the sidewalks. Sidewalk construction is funded separately.
.:. If Regent were a state aid street - what would assessment be?
Response: The special assessment for state aid streets such as Culver
Road, is 25% of the residential assessment on local streets.
.:. Has Golden Valley checked with Crystal on statistics on their sidewalk
use? Has there been an increased use there?
Response: The City has not contacted Crystal.
.:. What is the timeline for project? What else do you do with the project?
Response: The 2008 portion of the project will include Culver Road and
the streets to the north. All streets south of Culver Road will be
reconstructed in 2009. All City utilities are investigated as part of the
project and repairs or new construction occurs as needed. This includes
sanitary sewer repairs, watermain replacement and storm sewer.
.:. Is not having a sidewalk an option? What is the alternative to a six-foot
walk? Can we compromise on a six-foot width? Can we decline City
maintenance?
Response: Not having a sidewalk is an option if the City Council
determines that a sidewalk should not be included with this project. The
six foot width is a minimum for snow removal, but more importantly so the
design can comply with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) for
handicapped persons, including wheel chairs. There are challenges to
meet so all people can use the facilities.
.:. Can the sidewalk be placed next to the street? Option to have at back of
curb?
Response: Placing the sidewalk at the back of curb is an option, but it will
require an eight foot wide walk.
.:. Why is the City Council not here to hear comments?
Response: Staff discussed the open meeting laws and allowing the
established process to proceed to the public hearing, where the City
Council will hear all those who have concerns about the project.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PUP (08-1 )\Regent Ave\Regent Ave Neighborhood Mtg 071107.doc
.:. Are sidewalk committee members here [at the meeting]?
Response: No.
.:. Neighborhood is concerned about safety - nobody from the City has
asked us about our opinion. It's not used in Crystal.
.:. When does the City make a decision on General Fund Decision?
Response: General Fund budget process for 2008 is already underway
with adoption to occur in December.
.:. There is an active. petition against the project.
.:. Why is there nothing done about accidents at 36th Avenue/Noble [in
Crystal]? Counts are wrong, so much traffic.at 36th, people using Regent
to bypass. .
Response: The.intersection is in the City of Crystal and decisions
regarding it are not the responsibility of Golden Valley. The traffic counts
taken this year are. typical for this type of street with volumes higher at
each end and lower in the middle.
.:. Something needs to be done about accidents at 36th & Regent (Crystal).
.:. Concerned about salt on blvd - difficult to maintain in grass in blvd strip.
Sand and salt makes blvdllawn difficult to maintain. Can't trim Colorado
spruce. Irrigation system will spray across walk.
Response: Salt is not used on all streets, the City does not have a bare
pavement policy for residential streets. Salt and sand are used on curves,
hills, intersections and problem areas. City's experience is that a
minimum boulevard between a sidewalk and the curb is four feet for grass
to grow.
.:. Bassett gets plowed into his yard. Blvd will be maintenance problem.
When will we get fined for not clearing snow?
Response: Boulevard area is important for snow storage during snow
removal. The City performs snow removal on a priority basis for sidewalks
and trails through out the City. Therefore, residents will not be fined for not
removing snow from sidewalks.
.:. Why is the City encouraging bikes on sidewalks?
Response: The sidewalks are for all users. Serious bicyclists will use
streets and bikes on walks will likely be children.
.:. Do sidewalks change speed of traffic?
Response: There are no studies that link increased traffic speed to the
presence of sidewalks.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\RegentAve\Regent Ave Neighborhood Mtg 071107.doc
.:. If the council chooses "no sidewalk" does that mean no new street?
Response: The sidewalk is being proposed because it is in the City's
plans and construction during the PMP is the best time to do the work.
The PMP project will move forward as determined by the City Council.
.:. I prefer a sidewalk - never had a problem with maintaining a blvd - very
surprised we do not have a sidewalk on Regent. Highly recommends'the
necessary safety provided by a sidewalk.
.:. Do not want to lose 11 feet of my property - is the City going to survey the
neighborhood?
Response: All the sidewalk improvements will be located with the existing
public street right-of-way and there is no acquisition of private property
needed.
.:. Prefer sidewalk without blvd. Did not think the Crystal sidewalk was a big
impact.
.:. How much will the City Council weigh a petition against the sidewalk?
Response: Staff will forward any petitions to the City Council and they will
weigh the petition along with the feasibility report and all other input. Staff
cannot speak for the Council on the weight given to a petition.
.:. Not in favor, no users. With peds off-streettraffic speeds will increase.
Response: No studies to support increase in traffic speeds because of the
presence of a sidewalk.
.:. Three Rivers system - do not ride bikes on sidewalks, no option of moving
to east side.
Response: The sidewalk is for all users, serious bike riders will likely use
the street. The recommended location is on the west side of Regent to
help reduce impacts and to facilitate connections to existing systems at
Duluth Street and the pedestrian bridge.
.:. Speed on Regent; half going over speed limit. What happens when walks
go in?
Response: Traffic volume and speed counts were taken this spring. These
counts indicate that 85% of traffic is going under 30 - 32 miles per hour or
less. There are no studies that indicate traffic speeds increase when
sidewalks are present.
.:. More stop signs! Cars slow down when vehicles parked on street.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Regent Ave\Regent Ave Neighborhood Mtg 071107,doc
.:. Does not agree with most of what has been said. Amazed no walks.
Parents in. Minneapolis. Younger families, more users. Design for how
things should be and enforce. How it impacts them versus community
"appalled and offended", death.
.:. Active in getting stop signs installed. Neighborhood agreement to walk on
lawns if problems. Nobody asked them if they wanUhem. Don't train kids
to ride on walks. Peak traffic not when kids use streets. Not talked about
walks at any previous point.
.:. Petition - what percent needed against to make walk go away?
Response: Staff cannot speak for the City Council on this.
.:. Decision will be a "typical" poliUcal process. Report won't express
sentiment and anger, council won't listen to people.
.:. Resident recommends others to contact their council members.
.:. How wide is the Crystal sidewalk? How will connection be made?
Example of eight-foot walk in residential area.
Response: Staff is not sure, but believes that the sidewalk in Crystal is five
of six feet wide. Connection will be made with a transition. Examples of
eight foot wide sidewalks (at back of curb) on Golden Valley Road near
Schied Park, Noble A venue, Meadow Lane, and other locations were
discussed.
.:. Give example of residential street with eight-foot walk?
Response: Golden Valley Roadnear Schied Park is not a state aid street
and the walk is eight feet wide when at the back of curb.
.:. Were does water go? Run-off? Guarantee on trees?
Response: Staff discussed typical reduction of impervious surfaces during
PMP projects in recent years, with a corresponding reduction in runoff.
Although it has not been a significant issue, the City will work with property
owners to replace trees that may die due to construction impacts.
.:. What happens to trees that die a few years later?
Response: Although it has not been a significant issue, the City will work
with property owners to replace trees that may die due to construction
impacts.
.:. Any traffic-calming elements into the design? Related issues? None
included. Eight-foot walk in intrusive.
Response: No traffic calming included at this time. The proposed street
width combined with allowing on-street parking should keep speeds in
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Regent Ave\Regent Ave Neighborhood Mtg 071107.doc
check. There are pros and cons to traffic calming measures. Regent
Avenue serves the most traffic of any local street in the area. Some traffic
calming treatments (like speed humps) do not work well in those
situations.
.:. Possible to vary sidewalk width block by block? Noble varies.
Response: Sidewalk widths can val}' block by block, or within a block to
avoid impacts. This is the situation on the north portion of Noble Avenue.
.:. Concerned about home value being affected by sidewalk.
Response: Staff cannot comment on property value impacts because they
are not appraisers.
.:. Resident requested a vote at this meeting.
.:. Doesn't think pedestrians will use sidewalk.
.:. Council and sidewalk committee should hear the constituents.
.:. Access to school.
Votes
How many for sidewalk: 5
How many against sidewalk: 48
Don't care/undecided: 2
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1 )\Regent Ave\Regent Ave Neighborhood Mtg 071107 .doc
al
"Valley
~, 1I~"'i.t d't, lit' -,!'t1; jg~1..mi. ~ III ~,'V);
~i~~ri~'~ ~<AieU~~E&1
Public Works
763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 21, 2007
Agenda Item
4.F.2. Receive and File:
A. Lett er from Farrokh Azmoudeh and Maryam Aliabadi, 2935 Regent Avenue North
regarding 2008-2009 Pavement Management sidewalks.
B. Petition from Regent Avenue North residents regarding 2008-2009 Pavement
Management sidewalks.
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Summary
Public Works staff has received two pieces of correspondence from residents on Regent
Avenue North, regarding the sidewalk proposed as part of the 2008-2009 Pavement
Management Program.
Attachments
Letter to Golden Valley City Council from Farrokh Azmoudeh and Maryam Aliabadi, dated
August 2,2007. (1 page)
Petition opposing sidewalks or bike paths on Regent Avenue North (3 pages)
Recommended Action
Receive and file correspondence and petition regarding the proposed sidewalk on Regent
Avenue North as part of the 2008-2009 Pavement Management Program.
G:\Executive Summary\2007\Council\2008PMP-R&F-Regent.doc
Aug. 02, 2007
City Council
City of Golden Valley
Ref: Regent A ve.N. street re-construction
Dear Council Members,
As a resident of Regent Ave.N. since 1998, we are absolutely against having sidewalk, let
alone side walk with boulevard
We suggest Regent A ve.N. to be re-constructed similar to Westwood Drive South with
curb and gutter only.
With all due respects.
Farrokh Azmoudeh & Maryam Aliabadi
2935. Regent A ve.N.
lJ Cl..1""\ c... ~ v~ i". ~
. 7(p3- 5~\- 45:).3
( /3
---rk\='"" \\.OW~~ ~ ~"JQ..(J')<9f ~Q,/\,.tkQ.~
a:e.- O~~~'2-~-k ;~~k~_~_
sk ('v"--'~\..'-'a(>.l.~ .~61 ~~b...a-:s.~r
~ ~. PKP# ... "._. _ _.
~O~( ._....d3~~.... .- f~ .- Q;'S!07'
sot/o \W.+bwl .... ~ t?#ff 4~ t(~?
~L?t~9-~Z . . jJrMtJ ~ 1/I1/or 7A?('
::;? ..WJl:J.. ~/~~~;
~~~5 .
>/DO Mfl:l~~ .
;';1.85 .. .V;~ ~
J- :3 55 . .J{I1dH If 'JId-, . fl?~
J.40S . ~ *aiy~
~4~5 .
j~1~ ~/
~ I..f 8:5 '..
~. 505. .. .~~ )rNf..tPeJ- . 1- /tJ -01
).54.5 .. .. ~ 6-zr-oj
),585 j.. ~ .J-VJ;.~ L-v-JM;J 6 ''-~-o1
S 005 f/ ttfr..,l",\ _
;,c.105 .M ~~.
5"00.5 '.J/{or\(. ~ W\..~\~
J.70 5
(, - .2f ~ () 7
~ "'es; -0-7
~-2)--67
k - l. I)"-C:1J
1 ( lOt 01
^ "'" 1'\ r-
f') . /1 __
" - .,,-.-,....,
J. 90 5
J./1 ~S .
~24~~ u~-
:3 8:u -$ffd..._- ~y ~
332. J
~?5-1
3333
833Q .
3;~:~1~~07F
~ 1 4 () . 11.1tl./u-r<- ~ ~
I~ J \. 6t Ii '" ~~~ ~~~
3311 .... ~
33r I ~
()s<!o. ?~-A~{ t
s'J$,( 'lRlThNtn. ~~//-tJ
~ I')v() L _. '-r~ . v tw'\N .. I
~~~- d111
~ 0,4...
J/3
V -;;5 - Of
19 "' J-s- - 61
7 ( {O (01
--;//010 r
&, /;2.5 )D7
t -'-S""' -C r
1 J 10 Ib 7
7/' o! tJ;)
1;(6/D7
7/10/0 7
1 \ It> I 01
7-/0-c57
r(tu/~7-
7//0/0 7
VIOI!)j
7( If) I Jl'
1'//o!()7
177. j, I 01101
i/II 07
7 II/a 7
71(~}
~~It/r7-
1/Ji tl1
7 ,-/ I --0 7
7-~~ 7
-'
3/3
.-z#o ~@>P\l ::;I l?7~ 7/a~
:S-to . ~ ~~ fUn.' r/ruay
~~~~ 13:en-tf~ 7d!c.L~ 7Ie~
;2QSf? ...~e.wr e.-.~~. 7'. 7,..n, 07
;5'14S ..<5<~ 'fk.-...-z}.'-' - ~ 1/<<~J(J7
}~~~C:lf;~/k7 ~? ;~~>~~~
>~ If 1 Z,vvr C4tl./~ '" 5.-(..0: L4' BLA-(t;. "" ~;C .." 7 - ~ ~ - ~;;-
!PI ~/1ff;1,^f rll1r.<. 1 r:/Ik'';1J 7~; -6-;r
d-boo .&-~GTV/ ,Z?~~ rZ~67
3Z4C1 . RCCSt~tU, S~e. t' l)qI\J ~otZO 7-25-C
alley
Memorandum
Public Works
763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 21, 2007
SPIlt
COPY
Agenda Item
4.F.2. Receive and File:
A. Letter from Farrokh Azmoudeh and Maryam Aliabadi, 2935 Regent Avenue North
regarding 2008-2009 Pavement Management sidewalks.
B. Petition from Regent Avenue North residents regarding 2008-2009 Pavement
Management sidewalks.
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Summary
Public Works staff has received two pieces of correspondence from residents on Regent
Avenue North, regarding the sidewalk proposed as part of the 2008-2009 Pavement
Management Program.
Attachments
Letter to Golden Valley City Council from Farrokh Azmoudeh and Maryam Aliabadi, dated
August 2,2007. (1 page)
Petition opposing sidewalks or bike paths on Regent Avenue North (3 pages)
Recommended Action
Receive and file correspondence and petition regarding the proposed sidewalk on Regent
Avenue North as part of the 2008-2009 Pavement Management Program.
G:\Executive Summary\2007\Council\2008PMP-R&F-Regent.doc
Aug. 02, 2007
City Council
City of Golden Valley
Ref: Regent Ave.N. street re-construction
Dear Council Members,
As a resi4ent of Regent Ave.N. since 1998; we are absolutely against having sidewalk, let.
alone side walk withboulevar4.
We suggest Regent A ve.N. to be re-constructed similar to Westwood Drive South with
curb and gutter only.
With all due respects.
Farrokh Azmoudeh & Maryam Aliabadi
2935 Regent Ave.N.
'\1nlley
Memoral1dum
Public Works
763-593-8030 1763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 21, 2007
S"'lt . .
COPt
Agenda Item
4.F.2. Receive and File:
A. Lett er from Farrokh Azmoudeh and Maryam Aliabadi, 2935 Regent Avenue North
regarding 2008-2009 Pavement Management sidewalks.
B. Petition from Regent Avenue North residents regarding 2008-2009 Pavement
Management sidewalks.
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Summary
Public Works staff has received two pieces of correspondence from residents on Regent
Avenue North, regarding the sidewalk proposed as part of the 2008-2009 Pavement
Management Program.
Attachments
Letter to Golden Valley City Council from Farrokh Azmoudeh and Maryam Aliabadi, dated
August 2,2007. (1 page)
Petition opposing sidewalks or bike paths on Regent Avenue North (3 pages)
Recommended Action
Receive and file correspondence and petition regarding the proposed sidewalk on Regent
Avenue North as part of the 2008-2009 Pavement Management Program.
G:\Executive Summary\2007\Council\2008PMP-R&F-Regent.doc
Aug. 02, 2007
City Council
City of Golden Valley
Ref: Regent Ave.N. street re-construction
Dear Council Members,
As a resident of Regent A ve.N. since 1998,. we are absolutely against having sidewalk, .let
alone side walk with boulevard.
We suggest Regent Ave.N. to be re-constructed similar to Westwood Drive South with
curb and gutter only.
With all due respects.
Farrokh Azmoudeh & Maryam Aliabadi
2935 Regent Ave.N.
l:) ~ 1"'1 ~ \) Q..,\"'~ 'C"'\ ~
7(P'3- 50..,\- 4533
l/3
. -rk t,,\\OW'c,,~ ~~JQ.f\\:\8f' ~o.I\-lk~,_
... a.r-e- <2~~o~~'CL -:k,.. ;~~L~~_
. .s:k U/.vtk"'aAJ .<i!)1. .0.. . b; ~~-\h.._K'S.~.t.__
. ~ ~ PKP~ . ..... .---. .-
.
.;tO~1 .......~ C>- ._.. f~ .d;'S/07 .
SODO ~~n. . _. ~ t1~ff 4./F/C~ C/20? .
~lfl~~~Z' fJ~ ~ 1/11/0r ~~
AI5171D~J ~/~~~~
.d,..JJJ .., .... . .. . ~ 7
~J. ~ 5 .
>IDO M,r~~n._
.;lP-85 ...Jr1J ~
,),355 . 4MH. f-~.fit~
d.40S . ~ -rcfiy~
~4 .)..5
~l-.t4S . d /.
~H 105 /tY/4v//..
~ '18.5 '__
;;'505. . '. . ~~. -;;;r-.tP..) -- . 1-. / () -01. .
)54.5.~ 6-zr-o'7
)..585L(). ~ .J-YJ.~ ~Jl&J 6'l.~-o7
S 005 f/tt/O-Ifb." .
). (,,10 ~ M ~t\,M ,
5"005 Vt{ot\<- ~ W\,~\~
J.70 5
~.-.2r-07
~ '"zs;-o-;
~-2~<>7
k - 2..:';- - ~
-r ( to l01
1\"""" r-
(l ,. II.. ~I" """_^ _
l A"'-"1:: - (,7
01745 .~W~
.~\J d&.v\q~.
~75S
dol7S 17~ ]~ ;; ~cL1
J<ao5
~~85
~CfoS
~.q~~ ..
d-~ 3S- ..
3a1~
33Jj
?3ZJ
'7?~1
333:3
8330
33/ ().. . 9f nrvie (7[~
~1~:)J-~~~
I ~j\;]Jt '\'~CW\!l ~~a,y1
33lt ....... ~
33r ( ~
(}5f!o.. ?~'A~.t t
S1P( iR(Th~ba.. ~.,. ~.. ,
~/:fvD L -.' 'r.Rf'.J' V ~ .. ....
~i Re. ~...
~(,6a... M .
~. -
...y~
d/3
V -)5 --(J1
G "' d~ - err
7{{o[Ol
711010]-
[; I-::z.s ! () I
t, ~s- -c 7-
7 /10 I b 7
7/' (} I 11/
,!r6!o7
1//0 jo 7
1 \ (~ I oJ
7-./6-CJ7
-r-fo/;rf
7//0/07
7/;011) 7
7(/tJ/J;7
1'/10107
717 f, I 0//01
1/11 07
7 /1/ tJ 7
7~/~l
f7-~/.lllr 1-
1 . . 1
II t2 .
7 ~/ I -0 7
7-~-f) 7
'7 -/~ -/J 7
3/3
--zf/o &@uJ\i ~ ~~ 71/.t~7
:no .~. ~a.wJI PUfi-.'-. 7(rUt3'Z__
~~~ 13:;enft~7i:!cLfUJ.7I~jh
~~t; ._.~~ ~~ ~ '" 7,.n.t>7
5''5'f~ .. 'Z,vvr C#~(f" 5&'A,L4' fjLA-t.t:-'C"-X--7 7-"Z.3 - ~7
~I ~/XfJt'Cf rldl.L r (;/ .~'';iJ 7?>-6~
ch?Poo ..&~G7J/;r . ,Z?~~ 7-Z~67
3Z4C1 .. Res;~tU\ S~e;:>t' OaI\J ~orZ.O 7-7..5-c)'-
M\ [e' m;; " 0"; "-a n' "' -Jl fE~ l~
,:~.: . : . ; - " It, -- ", : i U Wii I~ Ii (,
Public Works
763.593.8030 1763.593.3988 (fax)
Date:
December 6, 2007
LJ FilE
To:
Mayor and City Council
Tom Burt, City Manager
From: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Subject: December 11 , 2007 Council/Manager Meeting
2008-09 Pavement Management Issues, City Project 08-1
During the public participation process and preliminary design for the 2008-2009
Pavement Management Program (PMP), several issues have been identified that
require resolution. Staff has prepared background information on each of these issues
for discussion with the City Council.
Intersection of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road:
The intersection of Regent Avenue and Westbend Road is located below the 100 year
flood (1%) elevation for Bassett Creek, and must be closed frequently due to flooding. In
addition, soil borings have identified up to 30 feet of highly compressible organic soils
beneath Westbend Road; and it has been determined that watermain within the vicinity
of the intersection must be replaced as part of the PMP project. An analysis of potential
solutions has resulted from these issues. The potential closure of Westbend Road
between Regent Avenue and Scott Avenue, and relocation of this block of roadway, has
been examined.
The consulting engineering firm of SEH has prepared a summary of the potential
modifications to streets in the vicinity of Westbend Road and Regent Avenue. This
analysis is attached to this memorandum for reference.
ReoentAvenue and Westbend Road Discussion:
Staff will be prepared to discuss the issues present in the vicinity of Regent
Avenue and Westbend Road, and would like direction on how to proceed.
Regent Avenue Sidewalk:
The City of Golden Valley Sidewalk and Trail Plan identifies the need for off street
sidewalks on Culver Road and Regent Avenue within this project area. . These identified
sidewalks were included in preliminary project discussions with property owners.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Corres 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\C-M Issues 121107.doc
Following extensive discussion with property owners on both streets, the City Council
called its Sidewalk Committee into session to review the need for these sidewalks. The
Sidewalk Committee made a recommendation to the City Council to eliminate the
proposed Culver Road sidewalk from the project and to continue developing the
sidewalk on Regent Avenue.
The City Council considered the Sidewalk Committee recommendations at its August
21, 2007 Council/Manager meeting. At this meeting, the City Council directed staff to
remove the Culver Road sidewalk from the project and to keep the proposed Regent
Avenue sidewalk. This direction also included pursuing a six foot wide sidewalk, with a
two foot wide concrete shoulder area, (total concrete width of eight feet) to be located at
the back of curb on the west side of Regent Avenue. Furthermore, the direction included
centering the total width of the sidewalk and street within the street right-of-way to the
extent possible, with variations as needed to minimize impacts to trees and
landscaping. Finally, the Council asked staff to investigate altemate designs for the two
foot wide shoulder to lessen the visual impact of the facility. This recommendation is
consistent with the City of Golden Valley Public Sidewalk and Trail Policy, which is
attached to this memorandum for reference.
Staff from the Public Works Department and SEH has completed a preliminery design
for Regent Avenue consistent with the August 21st Council direction. This design was
presented at the November open houses. Staff received numerous comments at the
open houses; as well as comment cards, e-mails and letters, since the open houses
regarding the proposed eight foot wide concrete sidewalk and shoulder. Based upon
this public input; Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements; the ability to install
traffic control signs; and snow removal and maintenance requirements, two sidewalk
width alternatives were developed. These alternatives are shown on the attached
Regent Avenue Sidewalk Details, along with potential transition areas at driveways and
signs. These options are as follows:
Six foot wide sidewalk with two foot wide shoulder:
As shown on the attached exhibit, this is the behind the curb sidewalk design that
is included in the City's Sidewalk and Trail Policy. This design would include the
tooled edge concrete shoulder shown on the exhibit. This design also meets ADA
requirements at driveways without modifications, and allows for the installation of
signs as needed.
Five foot wide sidewalk with two foot wide shoulder:
This proposed design includes a five foot wide sidewalk and a two.foot wide
shoulder with a tooled edge. This proposed design would require width
modifications at locations where signs are present and at each driveway in order
to meet ADA minimum width requirements for sidewalk widths. The needed width
transitions can be done with the tooled shoulders as shown on the exhibit.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Corres 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\C-M Issues 121107.doc
Due to the need to transition at driveway and sign locations, this proposed design
may have less visual impacts in front yard areas, but will match the proposed
standard designs appearance at driveways, intersections and street signs.
It should be noted that the anticipated tree and shrub removal are the same for
each of the alternative designs.
Reaent A venue Sidewalk Discussion:
Staff would like direction from the City Council on which sidewalk design to
include in the feasibility. report.
Intersection Modifications:
During the preliminary design phases of each PMP project, a review of the geometric
layout of each intersection in the project area occurs. This review looks for alignments
and conditions that are potential safetY COncerns, may be problematic for maintenance,
and may promote higher than desired vehicle speeds. This review usually results in
minor modifications and a number of intersections, and major proposed modifications at
some intersections.
The intersection review for the proposed 2008-2009 PMP project resulted in four
intersections where major modifications were considered. Several alternative layouts for
each of these intersections were developed, and a neighborhood meeting was held for
property owners in the immediate vicinity of each intersection. At these meetings staff
discussed the benefits and concerns of each proposed layout with those attending, and
a favored alignment was agreed upon. These revised.alignments were then
incorporated into the project design and included in the layouts for the second project
open houses. The four intersections are illustrated on the exhibits attached to this
memorandum, along with several intersections where minor modifications have been
made..These four intersections are as follows:
Triton Drive and Scott Avenue: The through movement from Scott Avenue to
Triton Drive was maintained and pavement area was reduced as shown.
Quail Avenue and Dona Lane: This intersection was modified to reduce
pavement area and intersect Quail Avenue asa "Tee" with Dona Lane.
Orchard A venue and Ordwav: The alignment of this intersection, including the
existing island in center of the intersection was maintained, with minor
modifications made to reduce pavement area.
Westbend Road and Ordwav: This intersection was modified to greatly reduce
pavement area and create a perpendicular intersection of Westbend Road with
Ordway.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Corres 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\C-M Issues 121107.OOc
The intersections where minor modifications are proposed are located through the
project area. Typically, these minor modifications include realignment to perpendicular
intersections to maximize visibility, reduce impervious pavement area, calm traffic and
minimize Wide open intersection that require multiple passes for snow removal. For the
purposes of illustration, several of these intersections have also been included on the
attached exhibits.
During the second open houses for the proposed projects, a number of residents were
opposed to these minor modifications, with the most common objection being the
degradation of the character of the neighborhood.
Intersection Modification Discussion:
1. Staff will recommend that the four proposed intersection alignments
discussed above, and as agreed to by the adjoining property owners, be
incorporated into the project design.
2. Staff would like direction from the City Council on the extent of minor
intersection modifications that is left to staff's professional judgement without
neighborhood meetings and public participation.
Surmountable Curb and Gutter:
During the public participation process for the proposed 2008-09 PMP, staff received
questions and comments regarding the potential installation of surmountable (drive
over) concrete curb and gutter. In particular, four residents of one neighborhood, and
one resident from the rest of the project area, discussed surmountable curbs on the
Comment Cards distributed at each of the open houses.
Although the number of requests for surmountable curbs does not warrant additional
neighborhood participation for this project, staff feels that the issue of surmountable
curb within PMP projects needs to be further discussed and procedural issues need to
be addressed. The first topic for discussion includes the number (or percentage) of
residents from a defined area that would like surmountable curb installed. As outlined in
the Pavement Management Policy, a minimum 75% of affected property owners must
agree to "opt out" of concrete curb and gutter on their street.
Public Works Maintenance staff has indicated that the streets that have surmountable
curb and gutter installed as part of PMP projects receive significantly more snow plow
damage to boulevards that those with City standard barrier curbs. Consistent with City
practice, sod damage from snow plows is repaired by the City each spring. Therefore,
these streets require higher maintenance efforts and costs due to the presence of the
surmountable curb.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Corres 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\c-M Issues 121107.doc
Surmountable Curb Discussion:
1. Staff will recommend that the Pavement Management Program be modified to
require 75% acceptance by residents of a street or neighborhood prior to
installation of surmountable concrete curb and gutter
2. Staff will recommend that property owners who have surmountable concrete
curb and gutter installed as part of a Pavement Management Project be
responsible for all repair and maintenance of snow plow damaged boulevards
adjacent to their property.
Special Assessment for Corner Lots at FrontaGe Roads:
Several property owners, including Valley Community Presbyterian Church, located on
Lilac Drive between Lowry. Terrace and Triton Drive, have expressed concerns
regarding special assessments for local streets that were partially reconstructed by the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) during the upgrading of Trunk
Highway 100. There property owners have indicated that there should be no special
assessments because the streets have already been reconstructed.
During the reconstruction of TH 100, the east frontage road (Lilac Drive) was completely
reconstructed at MnDOT expense. In addition, each of the intersecting streets received
a varying degree of reconstruction based upon the specific conditions at each
intersection. Concrete curb and gutter was typically installed in order to facilitate
drainage, but subgrade correction beneath the curb and gutter was not as consistent. In
most instances subgrade correction was tapered out from its full depth on the frontage
road to no correction at the end of the new curb and gutter. Therefore, the structural
capacity of these intersection roadways is not as reliable as desired, and the long term
performance of the street may not be consistent with other streets in the area.
The 2006 PMP project, which was located between TH 100 and Sweeney Lake, also
included comer properties with Lilac Drive. In each of these cases the subject properties
were assessed full local street reconstruction assessments for the local street frontage.
Frontaae Road Assessment Discussion:
Staff recommends that each of the comer lot properties adjacent to Lilac Drive
and local streets within the 2008-2009 PMP are assessed a full local street unit
assessment, as long as the property has street frontage being improved as part
of this project.
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Corres 2008-09 PMP Project No. 08-1\c-M Issues 121107.doc
Appendix D
Culver Road SIl;lewalk Comments
2008.2009 Pavement Manaaement prooram
~ ...
c:
N
... ...
Address Street -3 .. Comments from Comment Cards
...
c: c:
i i
; H ! j To the payment management program participants: I was filling out the enclosed foans and
i ii i ithought how wonderful it would be If the fIVe questions covered all the intricac:ies Of this
H , !project. TJ:'is moming I walked down Culver Road.and thought of all the beautiful trees th~
" \
t i 11
H
jwould be npped down, all the decorative landscaplllg proud homeowners have put on thelf 1
jproperty to make it look Uke someone cared about the property. It is unfortunate that the City
! does not feel that way a,bout Culver Road and the taxpayers Who foot a lot, of the bills. When
!first read the information, I flllured there would be a little more thought put into destroying a
!road before going ahead. A three-hour meetlng hardly could cover anything important that
!must be addressed. Culver Road goes no place and the chances of it ever going someplace 'I
! are quite remote. With the creek on the east side and Highway 100 on the west, why would a
ICity spend so much time, money, effort and paper on something that is, at the most, one mile
I long.
lit seems very suspect that thare is not an underlying mollve. I am against this (I hate to use I
!"improvement" as it is exactly the opposite) program as if there is money available to widen a I
J road that does not need widening, perhaps the City coulcl see if there is money available fOf I
!something that would benefllthe Culver Road residents - like street lighting. I am extremely I
!disappointed In the elected offICial of Golden Valley that they would aven consider this I
! !fIagrant destruction of a neighborhood when there are so many streets In other parts of
t----le~:~=,~~,"~l.J
! lconcerned that widening the street will increase traffIC and speed. My second concern is the
I !sidewalk. Asidewalk will damage the aesthetic quality of Culver Road. When I bought my
X ' !home 16+ years ago I bought in August. The grass and the flow of the property were I
istuMing. Each lawn flows to the next, and the mature tre8$ gave it charm and class.
j(Something new developments don't have). This was a very big factor in my decision
jbecause I didn't like some features inside the house. The actual property helped me decide I
Ito buy. Dissectlng the front lawn for a sidewalk will remove that characteristic from our
I beautiful neighborhood. I have lived in the house for 16 years. There is no need that I have
! observed for a sidewalk on Culver Road. I
I Foot traffic on the road is minimal on any given day. There are less than 5 people each night
!walking, there is several that bike. On weekends there are approximately 10 a day. The
i sidewalk on Culver is desirable to the City but the residences (majority) are opposed. I am II
lconcerned and realize that my property value will drop. You will remove my majestic elm in .
Ithe front yard, one that graces my property and proVid,es shade to my home and yard. This \.
ltree is DYer 50 years old. \MIen I came to the open house a representative stated we don't
I know what side of the street yet, but we have some very conservative folds on the sidewalk
j committee that take removing trees very seriously. My home will not have the same curb i
i appeal that it does now with a side sidewalk and a retaining wall. I do not have to worry now I
'jof the tiability of someone sUpping on my sidewalk and suing me. A sidewalk will encourage i
,people to drive faster. A sidewalk will dissect the beautiful flowing landscape. It will make it !
1 look Uke Noble. Have you driven down Noble? I
! It no longer has the suburban appearance due to the blazing while sidewalk (which isn't I
jconstant in its appearance with allemating boulevardS). In Summary: SAFETY: Increased I
! speed causad from widened perception that people are safe on sidewalk to speed by. !
! Increased traffic. Increased tiability to residents. NEED: There is no justlfl8b1e need for ,
! sidewalk. The residents do not want a sidewalk. Use the money tor something residents i
lreally nead or want. Property Values: Will drop due to the encroachment of property lines by I
ja wider street and sidewalk. Sense of privacy will be lost. Aesthetically unpleasing, \MIy I,
!make illook Ukea city? Increased City costs: This will increase the others cost to maintain the
I sidewalk. Wny would a decision be made to do this when there is no benelit to the City to do I
,I,,'.i,.,' lthiS? Deforestation: There are many flOe trees that will be removed for the sidewatk. In this I
, itlme of heightened awareness, you should rethink this. Kathleen M Burt 6/23107 t
L.'==:.:.:.:~~::.:.::~=.::.-:::.t9.qL.~.!:~J[:===:.:.:::~:::::::=!t.:T".t--'"-"x.:.=-=::J!JB!!t.I!2!!'i~~.I~iiDi~~jr~i~TnT9..!~~C==-=~.::.:=~=::~="._-=:.:::::_.::.=..~:.~.==::.::j
, I Please review the following attachemtn: It explains in more detail our concerns listed below:
i 1)drainage concerns, 2)impact on trees and green space 3)design and aesthetic concerns
i4)environmental concerns 5) re-grading concems 6)overall impact to the neighborhoods.
!Thank you. Our fll'st concem with the city's proposal to widen Culver Road and add up to an
jeight foot sidewalk involves our driveway drainage both near Culver Road and away from our
!garage door. The driveway has very little slope and we worry that near Culver Road,
I regardless of its eventual width, the Road may to slope away from the driveway enough to
........._..!provlde adequate drainage.
4715
i
I
ICULVER RD
t...
4747
iCULVER RD
i
4815
,
ICULVER RD
i!
:'
......M.H....'.._.._.JL
X
IThiS would be a loss nol only to us, but also to the rest of the neighborhood. Many residents
! and people who visit our neighborhood often comment on the beauty of our large trees and
I how this feels more like a rural area. With many in the neighborhood working downtown
!(actording to the 200 U.S Census, 29 percent of the Golden Valley workers age 16 or over
iwork in Minneapolis or SI. Paul), our neighborhood serves as a refuge and oasis from the
t---'v_..__.~._~...._v.__.~...'-__,_,__"___,_,,,v.....v____._ .._.___.<____v_...__.. I noise, congestion, and visual hardness of the asphalt and concrete of the central cities.
; 1
IVisuaUy, a large sidewalk placed about 15' closer to our front doors would create a great deal
jof visual tension that would be disconcerting. The neighborhood's lot size just aren't large
ienough, and our homes are too near the street, to handle this scale of sidewalk. Personally,
lhaving a road and sidewalk 15' closer to our front door would impact our sense of security and
jprivacy, particularly since we would lose our trees. As it is, one evergreen tree blocks our
Iview of an asphait intersection to the west and another hides a neighborhood's car-laden
! driveway to the east. The trees also provide shade to walkers, reduce run-ff and waste water
jprocessing costs and reduce our need for air-conditioning. We need to start thinking about
; Ithe affect Global Warming will have on the fivability of Golden Valley. Adding more asPhaft
_"'_.. ;..............._....:and concrete, unless absolutely necessary, seems unwise.
. iWe understand that asphaft and concrete does not "cause" Global Warming, but climate
ichange needs to be considered. II is nol longer a 1970s world. The loss of Il1llny mature
!trees and additional acres of asphaft and concrete would also continue to more runoff into
! Bassett Creek. We, and many of our neighbors, would be interested in working with the city
Ito do our pari to help find local solutions to help mitigate climate change. We are aware that
iwe can only do so much on the local level, but we think it Is our dity to do what we can.
!\Mlatever happens with the Culver Road project, we would stili be excited to work with the
I. city on thls Issue. We are very organized as a neighborhood, so we hope you will make use If
; all these intelligent well-intended people. this Is a great opportunity to get people engaged in
isornethlng truly worthwhile. We also have concerns about plans to re-grade our front yerd
........ .land the yards of selected neighbors.
iWe dislike the looks of retaining walls. But also find the idea of increasing the slope of our
ifront yerd unacceptable. Ills hard enough to mow as it Is, and as we get older, we think this
jwill be a hardship. Also, we think this would necessitate the construction of steeper steps to
lour front door, which could be treacherous in the winter. We are also concerned about
lmaintainlng a sidewalk. Even though the City Attorney says the city would be responsible
ishould someone be injured on the sidewalk, our Insurance agent assures us that we would be
,: 1 jthe ones that would be sued.
r"-- ---------i.-------...--.-.- r----.~'-...iOther neighbors have conflmled this wiiji' their iii5i:if8nce a9ents. Overall, welhinkthecons"j
i jof having asidewalk and wider road far out-weigh any possible ben efits. We were told thatif 'I'
. jthe road were widened to 32' and a sidewalk added, we would lose 23-26 trees from this short
!stretch of road. This would be a disaster. If a tornado came down our street and caused this
Imuch destruction it would be considered as such. Since there really is no need for a Sidewalk!
!on Culver Road and there is a consensus on Culver Road and in the rest of the Woodlawn
;Neighborhood thai a sidewalk Is nol wented and would nol be used, the idea that this
lsidewalk would connect the trail system to Noble Ave is not a logical one. I
......u~..;..._.___.~..___.w._~J..w._..~~_~y_______.~.__H"'_"~~"_.~'W ,__u,_,y"_,~,,,_,,,~,,__~,,~u"'_Y''';''_' . __ ....1
, ; IPeOj)ie would ncitbedraWn to"useCulv8r Ro8d'Wheii there are moredirectand'pleasiiOi"
ioptions that people naturally use. We think that the money from the General Fund that would
i be spent on this sidewalk would be better used on other projects, such as planting trees. For
iexample, Mayor Bloomberg has proposed planting 1 million trees in New York City. We know
lthat discussion surrounding Culver Road project is nol all about what we want, but the plan
...........ldoesn't seem to be positive change for us or our city.
i
. .
. .
..,...---.......,.---.--..--,- ----.-----.-....--..-.---.. ..-..-.....--.... ...._,......~,..,....J
----=.==:=:=.:.~=:==~::.:=.:.~=.:.~.=:.~:::::==:.::=:---..~:.~.=.::.=~~.=:::..=~=.::.::.=:===::==::=~.=::~.~:..:.:::.::::::.:~!'
rom Mr. Christensen: My concems are as foUows: 1. appearance - Our neighborhood will
ange from neighborhood to city (cold, hard, ugly). 2. safety - In the 60 years since our l
house was buiit there have been NO pedestrian/auto ac:cidentsl! 3. drainage - There have I
. been no drainage ProblemS. through the years. City streets with curbs have frequent clogged
idrains with pooling of water. Statistics show this to be true. 4. Expanse - The cost to the .
i property owners will be a tremendous burden forced upon us. The repairs to Culver Road I
lsince its fll"St being paved have been minimal with minor patching and once being resurfaced.
I How many city streets have survived 60 years with so I.ittle maintenance and expense? 5. ,.
llncreasad lrafIic and crime. 6. Abuse of power. This is our neighborhood. A dectsion of this
lmagnitude should be determined, by the people who live on the own property on Culver Road I'
i and the Immediate community.
.....--.-.......---.T'..........-..
_.____..~..~..~~..~..~...~._'~...ww.:"-"'-w-.
i . !
!-............~_.._....-._...-..-._....._.....-.~..t-_..-....----.-..~_...
I !
I
. .... ...,._.... 'H"'_-""_'-_':' .._..~.."..._._~,_..__..._....._._..~_._.~~
;
;
.__.......1..-....~.
t.....-.-...........-....
I'"
t...
4907
CULVER RD
"T""---' '--'j We knOW there are plans to put in storm drains that may keep water from spilling into tne end
i lof the driveway as it currently does, but remain concemed at the grade at the end of the
I driveway. At the garage end of the driveway we are concerned that a sidewalk, of one is
! built, would create a dam and that water would flow back Into our garage, and uIlimately our
! basement, as we have a tuck -under garage. Our main concem Is the loss of our trees and
'1' green space stemming from a wider road and possibly the addition of the proposed eight foot
sidewalk. We have two huge 55+ year old Evergreen trees near the road that would be
I removed and another 55+ year old Honey Locust tree that will be damaged or killed by the
..Jnecessary re-greding oftha front yerd.
;
;
4937
ICULVER RD
,
,
~,,:===.._._~~.::.=::::~=::.=.::=.:..==:~~~~:=:.:.===.~._~.======~===.=.."...J
, !We were not available to attend the open house, but we are not $UPporting any plan to CUlveq
: ithat would require the loss of green space. Widening the road, adding a boulevard, and I
:adding a sidewalk is not an improvement to the neighboltlood or city in our opinion. We have I
I !not seen any details from the city that communicate the true Impact of any proposed project.
l lit is imperative that they city listen to the feedback of the citizens before any actions are
_._.____.___._L..... . ;taken. !
ii ..-. .-..----lRetain~-~lIs;; ~ Si;~-; ~~::; ~ ~~~-;;from~. WailS;" --;~;or con;;;'l
iand we hope to replace with this project. Tree roots In sanitary sewer have caused problems !
i in past. We now clean out once every 2 years and that controls problem. Large elm tree is 4 !
1ft from street, will it be cut down? Sidewalk recommendation for Culver Rd came as comPlete'l
isurprise and we have many concerns: loss of trees and shrubs, significant reduction of front
lYard, special assessment, and need based on Culver Rd traffIC, Our daughters walk on I
iCulver to Noble Elementary School daily. I walk to Noble daily to catch Metro Transit bus. I
lWe have not had safety concerns. '
.......".._..._._....,..__..""....."..............".".....__.................__...... ......._..........._...............".._........._....._.....___......._........__....w.._...".'''' !
....... _.. .............._.._'_HM_.._H__~_...._ . . M"_" ,.... -.". j
....L..._.._._..:::.=::::.~::.:=-~=~~:=.:::.~:~:~=:~:=".~:::::=':.=:.:~====:::=""....=:..................._-...._"...........~::::=:.:::":
if am not in support of this project and am concemed regarding the process utilized to pursue i
Ithis proposed program. We have lived in the neighborhood for 16 years and are unaware of al
X !~e n~ber of residents. seeking a. sidewalk for Culver Road. I have recently. discussed this II
IISSIIe with many of my nelllhbors and all (that I have met with) have the same concerns. I
..... ..,...".........I1ook forward to discussin.ll this Illl!!!.~Mure. ... ....._.._.."~...__._~...,,._.... _""""'_'"
iWe really enjoy Golden Valley and would be very upset if you decide to put a sidewalk on our!
I quiet street. With Noble and Regent a much busier roads this is certainly what our road would I
ibecome. we don't want to live on that type of road. We would never live on Noble or Regent I
lfor that reason. We also don't want a sidewalk cause people will be waling right in our front
!yard 10 ft away from our door. It would be very distracting to our three small children to have
i people walking that close to our house not to mention loud with talking end clogs barking. I
__....; .,_,.:=:::~=:'::1:.*'~~L.=::=:=:=:..-=.===:."..........:::~.=::~:.'''''''='.'''.-'':=======:=~~:~::='=:::::'!
i lWe are very opposed to a. sidewalk and street widening project on our street. we a re in the '1
i center of this neighborhood and feel that not only is this un-necessary but it would ruin the
X I look of the street and curb appeal of our home. There is simply NO NEED for a sidewalk on
,Culver Road. Please stop the plans and simply do the road at the same width and without .
r:!!!I.ll2.!!r h~.:rhank Y9\11 ,__._._.........................._......._...._...._._...........
IFrom Mrs. Christensen: I bought a home in Woodland Park In 1948. It was one of 100 homes I
Jproject. There were farms all around us. Golden Valley has grown to become a city. llove
!Goldan Valleyl But taxes have risen so high I can barely afford to live here. Taxes keep rising,
iand retired income stays the same. I have lived on Culver Rd for 59 years. It hasn't had an
iaccident all these years as It is safe to walk on Culver Rd. we do not need curbs or
!sidewalks In the 59 years. Why start now. It costs too much. Don't drive me out of GV with
your high taxes ~asel!!l ve.'Y.~!!'~~ Del~ A Christ~nsen ____......._......... _"..... .
. .
. .
i j
r........-...";jin5 ..._- -!cUi.\iEFniD"'--"-:
,....::=.~~~~?i:::=..=]fP.IY.!:.~..~~.:==~:-.
4947
!
!
iCULVER RD
X
r-
i..
....... ... ._._~._-_._.._-- ...., !_~-_._-~_..._.~-_.......
:.~t::::::~=::I~~~~~:~~::....:~..~:::~:::.........
5027
iCULVER RD
5037
;
!CULVER RD
.._....~~......~....~..~..5038~~~.___.,,:-= I~uLVE~..~._~.:~~.
5047
!CULVER RD
!
!
1_.............
::.~f.~:.=.:=:=:.....![q~~~.~!?:.....
"j I am 8IIlOIl9'iiiev8SimajOriiYkI'myneighbOihOOd"~"'speeiiiCiiiiy"'cliiiier R08ej'::-WhOareNOi'....
IIN FAVOR of having a sidewalk installed on our street. Curbs-yes, sidewalk-no. It will
idecrease the green space we all love In our neighborhood and there just isn't enough foot
..................." ........._..................,........"...................."',..,j!![~ to ,!.,!p~-,.!!!..!!!!!!' Luana Ba.~."......................_....._...._.........._........_....__.._....
i ! '
5325 iCULVER RD x iWe request protection fence around clump of mugu pine and spruce located next to driveway.
;~-~~E~~p~rf~~~~~~~~~~~~~1
t."......... ....................."'....... ............................. . .....................l................. ..... ...............-............................................................."........ ................................"'..... ..............................-.................................... .;......... .............\
. .............................. .....................,1................................_...................."'.....................,:'...... ......i........................i..._........... I
i ! !. j . ,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,., ................"'.........................-...."............ ..........................................................................-............................."'......................."''''........1
r-"....._..-~..A.....~~_......._,._....---H.~.B..[._.^.-.,...-...~~..,_..~.-_._........~~.._..'_ ..,..-._..~~.,_h."'.--_...,.........,-.~...i._...-- .......~_._.~"m._._~...___.,._.,__.....~-.."...._...__.__. ........____.-'-__._".........~h.<___...__~._..._'__ft.._.....___...~... ,
!. .."'......................"'............."........... !.......................................... ...... .......... !...................... ......'..................... ...... ....."........................................................................................................._."........__...._........................... I
,........................ ......... .........................,......."................... ................".........j..... .............J..............................."...I.........."................ .................."..".....................j
...................L........................................................................................i....__"............._................__....:::.::.:~::.::~.::'::~:~:::::.:::.::=.::=:=:~~.:~~:=:.:::::::.::.:~:::::=:~~::=..::::~::::.::::~:::=i
j ......................................................i..........--.... .................-......--..........."',..............i. ........-.................1..--......."'...............................-.----.................. -........"'...... ...............-...-.....................---.........-.--......................
, ... .... ..... ............"........... .................................___.................--;..'__...........,.-..............................j...............,......... ........._..._...."'.................._........"'...."'....... ............................................."'.........................................................."..............".............. .....1
E:.~..~:~.~.=':.~::~::=:=~=:::J:::~:=::::::.:::=~:.::.~=::=:::::::.:=::J:~::~:.'.................:.................:.:.::.::.::~:::.::::::~::::.::::=:~:=~:=::...~:.:.:..::~:::.::.:::~:~:=.::::.~.:::=:::===:.:~:::::::::=~:::==..::.:::.:.:=:::~:-:.::~.::~.::......l
I. ._~..___._.:._..._.._.~m_'....,..._.~.~hj..___.........__.__.,._...__.._.~.....~.^.._...l.~-.---- ._h_...>h..~____~.~__<..._.,.~____._,.. _,____..__~._._..A..^..~...,;,_~..<_.........~...__.....__.'----_____.___,..._~,-~.....,.-.,.--._.~.- '_,.___~........._M._" i
"..v~.v.._._~...y....'v~._.~.~_y..~..__.....,'...,...._"'. ... ....f
....._l.......n
5320
!CULVER RD
X
RECTI JUL 1 0 2007
RL6
ce;o:::t Pn1 P
JUt. 'iJ1J7
To Mayor Loomis and members of the Golden Valley City.Council:
Re: Sidewalks on Culver Road
Our comer lot intersects with Culver Road and Perry Avenue North. We have lived here
for 43 years, during which time our children have walked the neighborhood and to Noble
School without sidewalks. We never felt a safety issue was involved; therefore this
unnecessary expense on our residential street seems lDlcaJled-for.
The planned widening of Culver Road and now the proposed adding of a sidewalk are
atrocious for such a residential neighborhood, when considering the projected loss from
citizens' lots and extra cost to them. Besides the dollar cost to everyone (especially those
who are retired and elderly), we feel that the City of Golden Valley simply cannot afford
the citizen cost for something so questionable.
In addition, the removal of so many 1l'ees resulting from both actions will do nothing to
beautify the city.
We are adamantly opposed to what we consider this unnecessary and disruptive proposal.
We sincerely hope you will abandon this proposal.
Dean and Ruby Van Horn
2901 Perry Ave.N.
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Ih-ese two
7r.e..es
W (J v../ ~ h e
{ es1..
Re: GoldenValley public meeting - City Hall- Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Page 1 of3
Clancy, Jeannine
_.......-............."~........_~.""'-_~........._,~_._.,.._.."...:.-,,.,_;,..._._._......__.........._..._........~_.._y.._".".,.,,,..._,.......--........,,... ._........' M._'_.....___.'.,.~..__'.~..... ...~_.._..._.~.........._..,.......N~h._ _~.,_...._.__..-......._._.......~...._._..._"-_..._.-----,....._......._-,.__........_."'...---......._.,.~.",..,_......_----,...
From: Clancy, Jeannine
. Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 5:57 PM
To: Freiberg, Mike
Cc: Burt, Tom; Oliver, Jeff
Subject: RE: Golden Valley public meeting -City Hall- Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Mike:
Most of these topics were either addressed at the in the neighborhood newsletter, at the meeting, or were discussed by Jeff with
Bret and his wife after the meeting. Jeff told me that he specifically asked Bret if he had any additional questions, which he
indicated that he did not. It should be noted that Bret is asking us to undertake additional research which is beyond the scope of
the project, which we don't have the staff resources or funding to do. Please also note that the newsletter indicated that its
purpose was to address these frequently asked questions so that the entire neighborhood would have access to the information,
as.opposed to responding to individual emails.
I will forward the email to the sidewalk committee. I wQuld suggest that you encourage Bret to continue to contact Jeff or me with
his questions and we will be happy to visit with him about the project.
If there is research that the Council wishes staff to undertake on any of these topics, please contact the City Manager so that we
can budget accordingly.
Jeannine Clancy
Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Phone: 763.593.8035
Fax: 763.593.3988
TTY: 763.593.3968
Email: jclancy@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
"""...............__.___,_...,.",....._.____""__,~",..,.....~,_,~._........._.__=__,..-.~,,,.~______-" .."',...___....._.._-__.....__-..-__...~........~___...'w........
From: Freiberg, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, July 25,20077:57 AM
To: Clancy, Jeannine
Cc: breterickson@gmail.com
Subject: FW: Golden Valley public meeting - City Hall - Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Jeannine: Could you forward this e-mail to the Sidewalk Committee? Also, the resident wrote to you and Jeff on July 15 (with the
councilcc'ed). Has he got a response yet? Thank you in advance.
Mike Freiberg
Golden Valley City Council
H...-...._._.._V.,._.._..H...__......H....__.,.V.........~..._.....,..__..._.~~.,__.~,............~~-v..'_...N....._...."........._.. ........_.............._................ .........,.. ...,."......._~..._......~...v.......--.................._........._..._.._......._.,......y.....,........~.....v_"......_._".....__......._..................... H....,....'H........',.._..._.......,;,.,.._..."...-......,........._, '___'-'''''_'__''V'''''' .,_.-.............,-'..
From: Bret Erickson [mailto:breterickson@gmail.com]
Sent: Sat 7/21/200712:47 PM
To: Freiberg, Mike
SUbject: Re: Golden Valley publiC meeting - City Hall- Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Mike,
Thanks for the reply.
No I have not heard from the Public Works Director yet.
I came away from the open house realizing what a tough spot everyone
Re: Golden Valley public meeting - City Hall.,. Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Page I (
Clancy, Jeannine
_....._.__...~........._,._..".._....,....~.......-'-...,..~....<~.,~.,._..'""_'''^''~'''''''.''''''''''';'''.''''''''''''''__''_''''''''''''''''''''''''''.__.,,_''''_~_''_'_..._N..........~.._~......__~._._......,.............-.~,..~..____.._......._._._......~..,"__...._._....~__..___...._...w~._,_.__.___...........""'.-._..,...
From: Clancy, Jeannine
Sent: Thursday, July 26,2007 5:57 PM
To: Freiberg, Mike
Cc: Burt, Tom; Oliver, Jeff
Subject: RE: Golden Valley public meeting - City Hall- Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Mike:
Most of these topics were either addressed at the in the neighborhood newsletter, at the meeting, or were discussed by Jeff wit
Bret and his wife after the meeting. Jeff told me that he specifically asked Bret if he had any additional questions, which he
indicated that he did not. It should be noted that Bret is asking us to undertake additional research which is beyond the scope (
the project, which we don't have the staff resources or funding to do. Please also note that the newsletter indicated that its
purpose was to address these frequently asked questions so that the entire neighborhood would have access to the informatior
as opposed to responding to individual emails.
I will forward the email to the sidewalk committee. I wQuld suggest that you encourage Bret to continue to contact Jeff or me wi
his questions and we will be happy to visit with him about the project.
If there is research that the Council wishes staff to undertake on any of these topics, please contact the City Manager so that w.
can budget accordingly.
Jeannine Clancy
Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Phone: 763.593.8035
Fax: 763.593.3988
TTY: 763.593.3968
Email: jclancy@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
From: Freiberg, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 20077:57 AM
To: Clancy, Jeannine
Cc: breterickson@gmail.com
Subject: FW: Golden Valley public meeting - City Hall - Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Jeannine: Could you forward this e.,.mail to the Sidewalk Committee? Also, the resident wrote to you and Jeff on July 15 (with tt
council cc'ed). Has he got a response yet? Thank you in advance.
Mike Freiberg
Golden Valley City Council
N...."_..___... ._.........,...'....._..._~_..............~..,.."........,.,_..._.._.......~...M._..._.__.._.............._..._....,.._. ........................_.........,._.._.......__.__,__..........__.__..__...................._"'._....v..... ..,.__......_.."............,...............__ ..._......._._._.__-_....,.................._.".._...........-_.___.........-___.............._.._.~....._........_...~............-..
From: Bret Erickson [mailto:breterickson@gmail.com]
Sent: Sat 7/21/2007 12:47 PM
To: Freiberg, Mike
SUbject: Re: Golden Valley public meeting - City Hall - Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Mike,
Thanks for the reply.
No I have not heard from the Public Works Director yet.
I came away from the open house realizing what a tough spot everyone
07/27/2007
Re: Golden Valley public meeting - City Hall- Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
is in. Apparently the Culver Road sidewalk was promised to someone
(the State, Mn-l)ot?) in return for the pedestrian bridge going in
several years ago. It's part of a long tenn "connect the city" plan
and Culver is a state aid road that comes with requirements. I can
see how this is complicated and seemingly unavoidable.
Page 2 0
Stepping away from that truth; you end up with the following view from
this resident:
It's too much. The city and SEH is talking about widening a 22 foot
street in some places to 40 feet of street and concrete. That's 18'
of someone's front lawn. There is no way that won't, one, hurt the
neighborhood look, and two, hurt our property value. By the way, I
don't think it's the sidewalks that hurt property value, I think it's
the land they tend to chew uP that does. Put a sidewalk on a 60-80'+
front yard and you might just increase property value. Take over a
third of my 47' of house to street distance, come as much as 16' into
my yard with asphalt and concrete, and you can't possibly get
residents to believe that's not going to hurt their MARKET value. Tom
May came in and explained to residents that it won't hurt our
assessment value because the county doesn't count property outside of
the "right of way" and they don't use sidewalks as a determining
factor in assessments. So what he is basically telling us is that our
appraised value will not drop, therefore our taxes will not drop, yet
our market value stands to come down significantly. This is not due
to a sidewalk, but due to the size of my front yard and the look of
Culver and Regent, post-project. One of the first things your told as
a kid is "life is nQt fair", but councilman, this is not fair!
You just can't have both. We must have parking on Culver and
therefore with state aid the street must be 32-34 feet wide. Already
a drastic change from my 24' width in front of my house. That would
be overkill enough for such a quiet little street as ours. Then, an
8' sidewalk? It's piggish. No offense but I can't think of a better
descriptive word. It's like taking the Queen Mary to get from Big
Island to Lord Fletcher's.
We have such a great alternative on Dawnview. It's perfect! A direct
connection to the trail to Briarwood and then the bridge over 100. A
good portion of it through wooded areas. Oawnview is already wider
street with no state aid size restrictions. This lack of state aid is
where I think we are stuck. This is why I've been told it won't even
be considered. Too much money. On the same note. I live on the
south side of Culver which is where the bulk of the land would be
taken. Why wouldn't they go north a bit? We are told because there
are obstructions such as shrubs and landscaping. Huh? And that
overrides gigantic trees? The real reason is the telephone lines.
They would need to be moved and that's not covered by the state. The
city would have to pay. We don't have the budget for that? So
therefore I stand to lose almost my entire right of way.
In 1970 when they drew up the sidewalk plans, did they know we would
plan to build 8' sidewalks? Absolutely not. They had cute little 4
foot sidewalks and tiny little boulevards. Did they realize the state
aid requirements and know they would be putting a "landing strip" down
the middle of a very quiet road?
To me and everyone I speak with, this is very irresponsil>le. Most of
my friends and family don't believe us when we try and explain to to
them. I think that's also why we've gotten so much interest from
Channel 4,5,9,1 ] and ]2, the Star Tribune, the Sun Post and City
Pages. It makes no sense. There has got to be something else
involved here. A hook. A reason. A driving factor. It just doesn't
make common sense and the city staff / SEH doesn't seem to have any
sympathy.
07/27/2007
Re: Golden Valley public meeting - City Hall- Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Page 3 (
Thank you so very mueh for your interest and willingness to listen.
Please forward this on to the sidewalk committee.
Sincerely,
Bret Erickson
Bret Erickson MCSE+I, CNA, SA VCE, A+
Certified Network Engineer
763A38.0976
breterickson@gmail.com
07/27/2007
Clancy, Jeannine
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Bret Erickson. [breteriCkson@gmail.com]
Sunday, July 15, 20076:06 PM
Oliver, Jeff; Clancy, Jeannine
Loomis, Linda; Pentel, Paula; Scanlon, DeDe; Shaffer, Bob; Freiberg, Mike
Golden Valley public meeting - CityHall- Wednesday, July 18th 6:30 PM
Jeannine Clancy, Golden valley Director of Public Works Jeff Oliver, Golden Valley City
Engineer
cc. Honorable Golden Valley Mayor Linda R. Loomis and our Golden Valley City Council
My name is Bret Erickson. I live at 5047 Culver Rd. My wife at I were at last
Wednesday's meeting for Regent Ave. It was difficult to get all of our questions answered
due to the number of people in attendance and everyone's desire to speak. I have prepared
a few questions, hoping you may be able to touch on these subjects during your opening
presentation or perhaps via email.
Respectfully:
J.. Have we explored continuing the nature trail from Briarwood that ends at Scott Ave and
Dawnview Terrace up through the strip of city owned land adjacently east of that point and
then create a sidewalk up Dawnview to Noble Ave? Would that accomplish all of the city's
goals even better than a sidewalk on CUlver?
2. Please provide an estimate of the additional cost that will be incurred to add a
sidewalk to CUlver.
3. Have you done a pedestrian study as to actual foot traffic on CUlver?
4. When you did your traffic study on CUlver, did you include Saturday and Sunday in your
average?
5. Have you taken a look at what the traffic numbers are on CUlver outside of morning and
evening rush traffic?
6. To reduce the severe impact on property, trees and shrubs on the south side of Culver,
wouldn't it make more sense to bring the border of this project equally towards the north
side of CUlver? I've been told this is due to the telephone poles. If the city has the
money to take on a sidewalk, why don't we have the money to bury the phone lines and
center the project? If we don't have the funds to do it right, why are we proposing it?
7. It seems all we hear about lately are "green" homes in new construction, "green"
neighborhoods, ,and the "green" movement. So many cities throughout the country are taking
a position of "green cities." Is this where the city of Golden Valley has its position?
Envision Golden Valley says Golden Valley is proud to be a "Tree City." Have studies been
done relative to this project and its effect on the environment, the urban heat blanket
and ultimately global warming? Run off into Bassett Creek? Please provide these studies.
8. Are there national standards that are recommended when it comes to making decisions
such as sidewalk needs and placements, resident opinions, tree and greenery removal and
consideration of degradation to property and neighborhood values? Are we following them?
Are there studies to be done in these categories that are recommended nationally? Have we
done them? Please provide examples.
9. It seems to be the national trend to reduce street widths to make them safer. The
numbers are staggering for accident and speed reduction. A simple web search finds scores
of reports, studies and examples of towns implementing this technique. At the Regent
meeting I didn't see any reference to this and your initial communication regarding Culver
does not indicate plans for this. Please explain why Golden Valley is going against the
grain. Please cite studies, reports or opinions on this topic.
10. When our property value dips 4-15% as is documented in national study after study
1
when large amounts of frontal property are taken to add sidewalks and boulevards, how long
will it take for by appraised value for property taxes to reflect that drop? Can we
request that be done immediately so I'm not paying higher taxes than my property is worth?
11. Please help me understand the 6-8 foot sidewalk explanation.
Apparently the equipment we have is built to handle 6 foot sidewalks.
Although I see very few if any 6-8 foot sidewalks anywhere in Golden
Valley. And we seem to maintain all of them just fine. I'm lost.
Secondly, if we did create a smaller sidewalk, wouldn't the money we save on the extra
feet. of concrete poured and labor involved easily pay for the equipment we need to
maintain it?
12. Are there national guidelines and standards in regards to the size of sidewalks in
relation to the level of traffic and impact on a quiet residential neighborhood? Could
you please cite these?
13. We are most confused by the following: The Golden Valley City Council ultimately
votes on this project and these meeting are being held so they can hear the concerns of
the citizens. Why was this not recorded to video? I understand the quorum requirements
and why they are not present. Well, actually I don't understand it, but I am aware of the
laws. At the meeting on Wednesday I listened to scores of intelligent, educated and well
spoken people. The people who make this community what it is today. They sited reason
after reason why a sidewalk on Regent is a bad idea. They asked hard questions that staff
was unable to answer. I watched our mediator (who seemed quite nice, so this is no
disrespect to her) summarize each of these passionate speeches into one or two cold
sentences on apiece of paper. I don't see how this could come close to having the City
Council understand our needs and concerns. The question is not only is this meeting not
recorded but also why is it not broadcast on public TV?
Please forward this email on to the sidewalk committee?
Please provide a link to the place on your web site where you will be posting the meeting
time and place of the Sidewalk Committee. Will this be televised? If not, why?
Sincerely,
Brat Erickson
2
Page 1 of:
Clancy, Jeannine
~'-'-'-"'''''',~''-'~'''_~_~'''''_'''W''''''''''''''~H_V.'''''^'''''''__'~''.........,_..~_~,._...._.~"..;__........_.4V~'_.~.......'._'""'_._,_~__.._.....-,.._____.........__........,..,v~....___...v.......____.,....;......~~._..~,.."........._.._..."".___.._..._..."......_..............._.-.-...~,_..__..__..._.___....__.--..,_.,.............~
From: Duane Coleman [duanelcoleman@msn.com)
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 200710:25 AM
To: Clancy, Jeannine; Oliver, Jeff
Cc: 'Bob Shaffer'
Subject: Culver Road PowerPoint Presentation and Virginia Tech Property Value Study
Attachments: Virginia Tech Valuing The Suburbs Report.doc
Jeannine and Jeff,
I attended the Culver Road presentation last night and appreciate your willingness to share your preliminary recommendations
and listen to the concerns of the citizens in attendance. I'm hopeful that a plan can be worked out that will address neighborhood
interests and provide the connectivity that the city desires.
Regarding last nights Powerpoint presentation, we discussed disseminating copies for those who are interested. It might be
helpful to have a link in which individuals can download copies. I would expect document size to be an issue for some. Please let
me know when we can obtain the PowerPoint or if another format is more convenient.
Also, attached is a study written by Robert E. Lang of Virginia Tech. The title is "Valuing the Suburbs: 'Why Some
"Improvements. Lower Home Prices. The study overviews various elements that impact property values. This is the document
that provides insight into the 4.5% decline in property values, due to sidewalks, that was mentioned prior to last night. The study
incorporated Mid Atlantic suburbs and mayor may not be fully applicable to Minnesota. I had hoped to bring this up in the
meeting, but didn't want to take away from the question that I asked. You mayor may not be aware of the study and Council
Member Bob Shaffer asked me for a copy.
Please feel free to contact me with questions. I understand and respect that you are proceeding accorclng to the direction that
was provided. I sincerely enjoyed meeting you both and want you to understand many.in the communlr view this as a
collaborative effort and want this to be a win/win for all involved.
Take care and enjoy this beautiful day.
Duane Coleman
Telephone: 763-242-2454
E-mail: duanelcoleman@msn.com
07/27/2007
Valuing the Suburbs:
Why Some "Improvements" Lower Home Prices
Robert E. Lang
Virginia Tech
Abstract
A recent effort to precisely gauge how much a particular improvement will add to a
home's sale price reveals some surprising insights about the nature of the suburbs. It
turns out that not all home improvements pay off-even some rather expensive ones.
Hedonic modeling of recent sales data shows that characteristics such as professional
offices and in-law suits can lower a suburban home's price.
This article explores the reasons for why certain property elements actually devalue a
house. It argues that the neighborhood context may determine the relative value of some
housing characteristics. In general, features that add to a property's "urban intensity" can
lower the sales price of single-family detached suburban homes. The paper examines
why suburban residents mostly resist changes that make their environment seem more
like a city. It also considers what implications this resistance has for developers using
New Urbanist design.
Keywords: Suburbs, House Prices, New Urbanism, Homeowners' Associations
Introduction
Pity the poor guy who puts a fence around his property only to have a homeowners'
association tell him to tear it down. Such horror tales are by now legend in the suburbs. I
But in an odd twist on the story, it turns out that the homeowners' association may have
been doing our victim a favor-a new study that looks at the way housing characteristics
affect sales price finds that having a fence knocks 2.8 percent off a home's value
(Sirmans and Macpherson 2004).
Economist William Fischel (2003) argues that the homeowners' associations seek to
preserve home values through covenants such as ones preventing fences. Fischel (2001)
developed the "homevoter hypothesis," where suburban homeowners behave "rationally"
to protect their house equity by carefully excluding land uses that could reduce property
values. It turns out that homeowners' associations, through their extensive and .
enforceable covenants, are an excellent means to this end. This is one reason that
homeowners' associations are so popular (Lang 2003).
I For a recent article that describes the power ofbomeowners associations see (McKenzie 2003).
It is inte,resting to consider exactly what types of land use and housing elements
homeowners' associations often prohibit. Research describing homeowners' associations
and gated communities (which are homeowners associations with walls) are filled with
examples of strict rules against seemingly trivial things (Blakely and Snyder 1997, Lang
and Danielsen 1997, Low 2003, McKenzie 1994). Residents are mostly prevented from
showing any hint that their property is used for purposes other than residential use. This
includes prohibitions against any advertising, or even parking a vehicle in the driveway
with a business name or advertising on it.
This paper addresses why a host of seemingly innocuous property characteristics are the
scourge of suburbia. It uses a secondary analysis of recent hedonic modeling of on home
prices by Sirmans and Macpherson (2003). The findings from the home price research
are interpreted using socio-cultural approaches to the suburbs, especially the work of
historian Robert Fishman (1987). The conclusion is that most conventional suburbs-or
more specifically, suburban home buyers~evalue many property elements that even
hint at an urban intensity or utility.
Hedonic Modeling Data: Some Counterintuitive Findings
Reporting on the work by Sirmans and Macpherson, Washington Post real estate
columnist Ken Harney provides a simple explanation of hedonic modeling. He notes that
hedonic regression "is designed to isolate each physical or locational attribute of a house,
and quantify its relative effect-positive or negative-on the sales price of the property"
(Harney 2004, p. FO 1).
The power of hedonic modeling is that it allows one to gauge the price impact of a
specific house characteristic, while screening out the effects due to other qualities of the
property. Thus a homeowner looking at these results can say ''what is the value of
putting a new full bathroom in my house?" The answer is-quite a lot, or about a quarter
of its value.
Using hedonic modeling, Sirmans and Macpherson (2003) analyzed 28,828 home sales
during two periods: 1996-1999 and 2000-2003. The sample covered only single-family
detached homes, and not farmhouses, condos, or rowhouses. The typical home analyzed
matches the profile of a mid-range suburban dwelling:
... the average selling price was $213,335...the average house had 3.5 bedrooms,
1.80 full baths, and 0.68 partial baths. About three-fourths of the homes had a
regular garage... Two-thirds of the homes had central air conditioning..."
(Sirmans and Macpherson 2003, p. 3).
The Sirmans and Macpherson study looked at home sales in 21 counties, in a region
stretching from central New Jersey.to northern Maryland.2 The study area comprises a
2 The counties in the study are Kent, New Castle, and Sussex in Delaware; Cecil in Maryland; Burlington,
Camden Cumberland, Gloucester, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, Salem, and Somerset in New
2
smorgasbord of Mid-Atlantic suburbs. Almost 9.5 million people live in the region,
which reaches into seven metropolitan areas, including New York and Philadelphia.
With the exception of Philadelphia County, the counties can be described as mostly
suburban and include such places as Mt Laurel, NJ, which is famous for a court decision
that ruled against the town's use of exclusionary zoning practices to keep out affordable
housing (Haar 1998).
While the study area is large, it does not cover all single-family suburban housing types
in the nation. For example, some of the houses' physical characteristics (e.g., basements)
are not found in places such as Florida. Also, there were also not enough homes in the
survey with features such as carports-a common element in California-to measure
their impact on house price. But the study's overall findings do have broad relevance for
much of the eastern US.
The Sirmans and Macpherson study, which was commissioned by the National
Association of Realtors, provides real estate agents with accurate information on what
features improve house values. Armed with this information, an agent can now tell a
seller to go ahead and put in for example a sprinkler system because it will lift the price
by almost nine percent. But buried in the data, along with useful nuggets of information
on which home improvements payout, is a striking pattern that shows a distinct bias
against housing elements that make a single-family home more utilitarian.
Consider several housing characteristics that actually bring down home value. Sinnans
and Macpherson report that an "in-law suite" (or a granny flat) drops a house price by 5.2
percent (see Table 1). Likewise a ''professional office" can shaveS percent off the price.
Believe it or not a sidewalk can cost a homeowner 4.5 percent of value at sales time,
while fencing shaves off 2.8 percent.
On face value all of these elements would seem to be "improvements," in that they allow
for more complete use of a house: an in-law suite lets extended families live together, a
professional office certainly shortens commutes, a sidewalk improves access and safety,
and a fence demarks property lines and keeps strangers out. But in the market for
suburban single-family detached dwellings all these features count against the price.
Even being on a corner, a location favored by businesses but apparently not by home
buyers, lowers value by 1.8 percent.
Now consider things that increase home values. Having a wooded lot (as opposed to an
open one) lifts home price by 3.3 percent. Having a paddock (or a fence to pen in grazing
horses) add a whopping 24 percent to house values-this is even more surprising
considering that no farm houses were analyzed. Apparently when it comes to suburban
home buyers, all fences are not created equal: fences to keep people out-small minus,
fences to keep horses in-big plus.
Jersey; and Berks, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Lancaster, Montgomery and Philadelphia Counties in
Pennsylvania.
3
Table 1. Value of Selected Home Characteristics
Home Characteristic
In-law Suite
Professional Office
Sidewalk
Fencing
Corner lot
Cul-de-Sac Lot
Irregular Lot
Wooded Lot
Water View
Pond
Sprinkler. System
Paddock
Source: Sirmans and MacPherson (2003)
Estimated % Change
in Selling Price
-5.2%
-5.0%
-4.5%
-2.8%
-1.8%
1.5%
2.2%
3.3%
7.8%
8.1%
8.7%
24.0%
Housing characteristics that promote greater privacy and contact with nature also add to
home values. For example, being on a cul-de-sac (essentially a quasi-private street)
improves house prices by 1.5 percent (which is the opposite for sidewalks and comer lots,
or features that can diminish privacy by encouraging strangers to walk past a property).
Water views adds 7.8 percent to a sales price, and houses built next to ponds are worth
8.1 percent more than a comparable home absent one. Even an irregular lot, which can
make landscapes look more natural and formal spaces, adds 2.2 percent over a square or
rectangle parcel.
What is Going On Here?
The finding that some major improvements to a house actually subtract from its value
begs the question: what is going on here? What may be going on is a bias by purchasers
of single-family detached house against property characteristics that violate a suburban
ethos. Such a bias is better explained by socio-cultural analysis than economics,
especially by historians who have studied the rise of American suburbs.
Historian Robert Fishman's (1987) book Bourgeois Utopias about the origin and
evolution of Anglo-American suburbs provides a good context for understanding for why
some housing elements lower value. Fishman traces a suburban ethos to the mid-19th
century, when suburbs emerged as a kind of antidote to cities in both Britain and
America. Cities of the era overwhelmed their residents-both socially and physically.
The 19th century city effaced all remnants of village life as they became concentrated
centers of commerce that were filled with crowds of industrial workers.
4
The middle class reaction to the ''profane'' world of the city was to construct a "sacred"
one in the suburbs (Lang 1995). According to Fishman, suburbanites used nature (or
more specifically, natural settings) as the alternative to the human-made city. Seeking
refuge from cities overrun with strangers, the original suburbanites also turned inward to
the life of the nuclear family and sought greater privacy (Fishman 1987).
Thus suburbanites from the beginning have rejected land uses and housing types that
smack of the city. The vigor of this disdain may have weakened over the many decades
since its origin, but even in vestigial form it can still show up as evidenced in the hedonic
modeling of home prices. Uses that add intensity or utility to a property run counter to
the suburban ethos. By contrast, features that imply a less intense, or natural use is still
preferred. In suburbia, woods and horses are good, and access (read: sidewalks and
comer lots) and work (or at least professional offices) are bad. In sum, country is in, city
is out.
Obviously not every. suburban setting meets this ideal-but the more . expensive ones
usually do. The people who set up the rules in suburban homeowners' associations
intuitively know this. They restrict most uses that even hint of the city; Take just one
case: clothes drying on a line. Most homeowners associations strictly forbid any outdoor
drying, including even pool towels hung over porch rails (Lang and Danielsen 1997, Low
2003). Consider that during the recent California power shortage, associations strongly
resisted relaxing this rule even though it would have lessened electric demand from
dryers (Scheibe 2001, Rasnow 2001, Garofoli 2001). A news account of this odd
situation has one resident was quoted as saying "when you see [clothes drying] you think
of slums. You think oflow-class areas. You think of poverty" (Garofoli 2001, AI).
Thus in the middle of an energy crisis-in an arid climate conducive to drying-hanging
one's laundry out in a homeowners' association-governed community is not an option.
Dual Suburban Housing Markets
Yet not everyone has an anti-urban bias. In fact, cities regained some popularity in the
1990s, especially their downtowns (Simmons and Lang 2003, Sohmer and Lang 2003).
Even many new suburban developments are getting denser and more urban in look and
feel (Danielsen, Lang and Fulton 1999). There is some evidence that people will pay a
price premium of about 15 percent to live in a New Urbanist (or noo-traditional)
community over a comparable conventional suburban subdivision (Eppli and TuI999).
How do these facts reconcile with the house price data presented above?
The most likely answer is that dual housing markets exist: one for conventional low-
density suburbs, and one for cities and denser suburbs. Lang, Hughes and Danielsen
(1997) developed the concept of "suburban urbanites" (using target market data) to argue
that some suburbanites show a preference for city living, including higher density
housing. Myers and Gearin (200 I) find that a large share of older households also seek
denser built and more compact housing units than is found in low-density suburbs.
5
The evidence appears to indicate that a distinct housing niche exists for cities and city-
like suburbs. A key issue is how large is this niche, and how does the demand for denser
homes stack up against the supply? Myers and Gearin (2001) argue that despite being a
medium-sized niche market, demand for desirable denser homes may outstrip supply. In
such a market, people may pay a price premium to live in some denser (including New
Urbanist) neighborhoods. This may help explain the finding by Eppli and Tu (1999) that
New Urbanist communities have higher valued dwellings than a typical lower-density
suburb with comparable housing characteristics.
While a good New Urbanist or city neighborhood may attract plenty of buyers, suburban
homes that have some urban elements may not be in high demand. Many places with
urban feel and amenity, including mixed uses, attract city lovers. But a granny flat
slapped on to the back ofa single-family detached suburban home does nota city make.
In most conventional lower-density suburb~, the market favors (as evidenced by ho.use
price analysis) properties that are decidedly un-city like. Houses that have city features
(even just sidewalks)are neither fish norfowl-they can be out-citied and out-countried.
The key implication for those developing neo-traditional communities, which feature
denser housing, alley ways, and mixtures of single and multifamily units, is to not go
halfway. There seems to be no value (or perhaps negative value) in just incorporatiD&
some neo-traditional features, and yet keeping a mostly conventional suburban land use
pattern. Most New Urbanist builders would agree-they want to build total communities
and not just typical suburban homes on smaller lots (Sohmer and Lang 2000). They also
fear that some developers will just grab some New Urbanist design elements such as big
porches and forgo other key ingredients such as grid street systems and mixed land uses
(Sohmer and Lang 2000).
Future Research
The Sirmans and Macpherson study was not intended to test a specific hypothesis but
rather generate useful house price information for realtors. However, future hedonic
house price research could be designed to address the ideas raised in this paper. What
would be especially useful is hedonic modeling that comparatively samples the dual real
estate markets described above. Based on the analysis presented here, it is predicted that
two types of results would occur. "Urban," or more utilitarian home features would lift
the value of city and neo-traditional properties and subtract from the prices of
conventional lower-density suburban homes.
Finally, homes in other parts of the nation would need to be included in future research.
It would be interesting to see if suburban houses in Southwestern metropolitan areas such
as Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Las Vegas exhibit the same price effects as those in the
Mid-Atlantic region. Given that these places have more densely built suburbs than the
Mid-Atlantic area (Lang 2002), there may be less negative impact on home prices from
more intense and utilitarian property characteristics than found in the East.
6
Author
Robert E. Lang is the Director of the Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech and is an
Associate Professor in the schools graduate Urban and Public Affairs program. He is
also Co-Editor of Opolis. The author thanks Karen Danielsen, Dawn Dhavale Jennifer
LeFurgy and Jessica Stine for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.
References
Blakely, Edward 1. and Mary Gail Snyder. 1997. Fortress America: gated Communities
in the United States. Washington, DC Brookings Institution Press.
Danielsen, Karen A, Robert E. Lang and William Fulton. 1999. Retracting Suburbia:
Smart Growth and the Future of Housing. Housing Policy Debate 10(4):513-540.
Eppli, Mark J.and Charles C. Tu. 1999. Valuing the New Urbanism: The Impact of the
New Urbanism on Prices of Single-Family Homes. Washington, DC: ULI-The Urban
Land Institute.
Fischel, William A, 2003. The rise of Private Neighborhood Associations: Revolution or
Evolution. In DickNetzer (ed.) The Property Tax, Land Use and Land Use Regulation,
Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar. pp. 273-286.
Fischel, William A. 2001. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence
Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policy. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Fishman, Robert. 1987. Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia. New York:
Basic Books.
GarofoJi, Joe. 2001. Bay Area Hung up on Clotheslines. San Francisco Chronicle, AI,
April 22. .
Hamey, Kenneth R. 2004. Sum of its Parts? What its Worth. Washington Post. February
7, Page FOl.
Haar, Charles M. 1998.. Suburbs Under Siege: Race, Space and Audacious Judges.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lang, Robert E. 2003. From Virtue to Value: Redefining the Role of Homeowners hip in
America, talk presented to the University of Southern California Annenberg School for
Communication Gimme Shelter: Affordable Housing and Homeownership. Conference.
Los Angeles, CA, March 31. Talk available at www.mi.vt.edu.
Lang, Robert E. 2002. Open Spaces, Bounded Places: Does the American West's Arid
Landscape Yield Dense Metropolitan Growth? Housing Policy Debate 13(4): 755-778.
7
Lang, Robert E. 1995. Hallowed Homes: The Emergence of "Sacred" Suburbs in Great
Britain and the United States." Paper presented at the Eastern States Sociological
Association Meeting, Philadelphia, April 1.
Lang, Robert E and Karen A. Danielsen. 1997. Gated Communities in America: Walling
Out the World? Housing Policy Debate 8(4):740-775.
Lang, Robert E., James W. Hughes and Karen A. Danielsen. 1997. Targeting the
Suburban Urbanites: Marketing Central City Housing. Housing Policy Debate 8(2):437-
470.
Low, Setha. 2003. Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in
Fortress America. New York: Routledge
McKenzie, Evan. 2003. Common-Interest Housing in the Communities of Tomorrow.
Housing Po/icy Debate 14(1): 203-234
McKenzie, Evan. 1994. Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential
Private Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Myers, Dowell and Elizabeth Gearin. 2001. Current Preferences. and Future Demand for
Denser Residential Development. Housing Policy Debate 12(4): 633-664.
Rasnow, Tina..2001. Ban on Air-Drying Should be Hung Out to Dry. Ventura County
Star, B8, July 15.
Scheibe, John. 2001. Airing a Grievance: Sun Touted as Best Clothes Dryer. Ventura
County Star, AI, July2.
Simmons, Patrick A. and Robert E. Lang. 2003. The Urban Turnaround, in Bruce Katz
and Robert E. Lang. eds. Redefining Cities and Suburbs: Evidence from Census 2000.
Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 51-62.
Sirmans, G. Stacy and David A. Macpherson. 2003. The Value of Housing
Characteristics. National Association of Realtors, Washington, DC. December.
Sohmer, Rebecca R. and Robert E. Lang. 2003. Downtown Rebound, in Bruce Katz and
Robert E. Lang; eds. Redefining Cities and Suburbs: Evidence from Census 2000.
Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 63-74.
Sohmer, Rebecca R. and Robert E. Lang. 2000. From Seaside to Southside: New
Urbanism's Quest to Save the Inner City. Housing Policy Debate 11(4):751-760.
8
Page 1 of2
Oliver, Jeff
"""'--~.....__..~....__..,.. '._..~_.._..__......'_~......... ..._.........................-...._ .__......_......._ ................ ...~._....,......~...._._....._._......_____.__~.............,_.._ _.__ .._....._ ...........; ..........._..._.,.~..,.".... ............ . ..."........,.__.N..._..._._...._.-.._._... .____......._.._.__........_........w........_....._
Clancy, Jeannine
Friday, June 29,200710:36 AM
ROBERT R HAGEN; Loomis, Linda; Freiberg, Mike; Scanlon, DeDe; Pentel, Paula; Shaffer, Bob;
Oliver, Jeff; Burt, Tom
Subject: RE: Culver Road Project
From:
Sent:
To:
Mr. Hagen:
I am writing on behalf on the Golden Valley City Council. The Council has placed this item on their July 10
Council- Manager meeting. At that time the Council will decide whether or not they will convene the Sidewalk
Committee.
Jeannine Clancy
Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Phone: 763.593.8035
Fax: 763.593.3988
TTY: 763.593.3968
Email: jclancy@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
-...-.....................--..-......-----.................-__.._...._...............,..'"........--..-_~_........._......_._.,....._._'._ ...__......_......_............~_..._.. ...;.........,.. ..,.;..._.....,~_.P.....H..P.._.,"_____.........._.HM._....__._............__..............M...........__._..........,_-.;.___.M_.............._...._"_........_.._
From: ROBERT R HAGEN [maiJto:ROBERTR735@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 6:32 PM
To: Loomis, Linda; Freiberg, Mike; Scanlon, DeDe; Pentel, Paula; Shaffer, Bob; Clancy, Jeannine; Oliver, Jeff
Subject: Fw: Culver Road Project
Has a decision been made on reconvening the Sidewalk Committee?
It has a been a week since my original enquiry and I have heard nothing. I would appreciate a
prompt response to the below questions.
Thanks very much for your attention to. this matter.
Sincerely,
Robert Hagen
-- Original Message -
From: ROBERT RHAGEN
To: !l.nQ!iI.Loomis@ci.g91den::Y~H~y .ml],.us ; miKe~fr~ib~rg@.c.1.99Jg~rl-.Y.fMleY,.!I!!J. us ; gede~~[Ilon~~golden-
yalleLrnrLus; pau~,p~n.1e!@ci,g.Q!g~n-yal{~y..mn.!!!~ ; e.Q!;>-'S{:l.il.ffer@cL9.Q!g~!J-valle~JJJn.us ; iclancy@ci,gQlden-
y~lIeY.mn.y$.; QJjy~r.. Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 8:02 PM
Subject: Culver Road Project
Dear Mayor Loomis, Council members and staff,
Thank you for listening to my neighbors' concerns tonight. I would appreciate it if you would inform
me of the meeting time and place of the Sidewalk Committee as soon as it becomes known.
I noticed that there were traffic counter and speed strips on Culver last week. I would like the
results stemming from their installation as soon as possible.
Thank you for your openness to my neighbors' opinions and your attention to my requests.
RespectfUlly,
07/27/2007
Page 1 of2
Oliver, Jeff
From: ROBERT R HAGEN [ROBERTR735@msn.comj
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 1 :47 PM
To: Oliver, Jeff
Subject: Re: traffic counts
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Red
Thanks very much Mr. Oliver.
Please send the traffic counts and speeds stemming from the counters placed on Culver Road
between Perry and Oliver within the last 2 weeks as soon as they become available.
Also please forward the dates during which all the traffic counts you've sent so far sent were
collected and any associated speeds, If speeds were also calculated.
Again, thank you for your cooperation.
- Original Message -
From: Oliver. Jeff
To: ROBERT R HAGEN
Cc: Clancy. Jeannine
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: traffic counts
Bob:
Staff has looked back in our files to find the additional traffic counts you requested. These counts are as
follows:
Culver Road at Lilac:
1969: 459 ADT
1983: 290 ADT
2001: 150 ADT
Culver Road at Noble:
1969: 489 ADT
1983: 560 ADT
2001: 450 MDT
There are no other traffic counts, other that those that were previously sent to you, on Perry Avenue,
Normandy Place or Orchard Avenue
Jeff Oliver, PE
City Engineer
City of Golden Valley
Phone: 763.593.8034
Fax: 763.593.3988
e-mail: joliver@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
From: ROBERT R HAGEN [mallto:ROBERTR735@msn.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 20078:43 PM
To: Oliver, Jeff
Subject: traffic counts
Dear Mr. Oliver,
07/27/2007
Page 1 of3
Oliver, Jeff
.._.._._....._._u...,v..~~_.u..........""v_.__._....,.,.""M~_....__...,."""..._.......;........................_....4.__........"......._.................,..,............... .._..."..._... ......,~.."._...~.,.._"...""...._"."~,,. ,_..........y...._.........._.........._........,..._..._.".......__....._......_._._______.......__....._..__..,...
From: Oliver, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 200710:31 AM
To: 'ROBERT R HAGEN'
Cc: Clancy, Jeannine; Mike Kotila
Subject: FW: 2008-2009 PMP Traffic Counts-Corrected
Bob:
Noble Avenue south of Culver Road was reconstructed in 1995, with the final paving done in 1996. As stated in
the original e-mail, any traffic counts performed in those years were taken after construction was completed for
the year.
Jeff Oliver, PE
City Engineer
City of Golden Valley
Phone: 763.593.8034
Fax: 763.593.3988
e-mail: joliver@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
from: Oliver, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10:05 AM
To: 'ROBERT R HAGEN'
Cc: aancy, Jeannine; Mike Kotila
Subject: 2008-2009 PMP Traffic Counts
Bob:
Your e-mail request for traffic count data along and near Culver Road was forwarded to me for response.
As you know, Culver Road is on Golden Valley's Municipal State Aid system, so there are mOre counts there.
However, on local streets, traffic counts are only taken when there is some sort of analysis done, such as a stop
sign request or concerns from neighbors regarding speeding. All traffic counts are taken over a 48 hour period
during the week and averaged to provide average daily traffic (ADT). Therefore, an ADT of 10 indicates 10 trips,
both directions, at that point. The following is summary of the traffic counts we have available in the areas you
requested.
Culver Road
West of Noble Avenue
1985 = 580 ADT
1987 = 560 ADT
1993 = 500 ADT
1995 = 500 ADT
1997 = 511 ADT
2001 = 502 ADT
East of Lilac Drive
1985 = 280 ADT
1987 = 300 ADT
1993 = 270 ADT
1995 = 300 ADT
1997 = 272 ADT
2001 = 168 ADT
2005 = 120 ADT
East of Regent Avenue
1987 = 337 ADT
West of Regent Avenue
07/27/2007
1987 = 385 ADT
Page 2 of3
East of Quail Avenue
1987 = 414
West of Quail Avenue
1987 =442 ADT
2005 = 380 ADT
Orchard Avenue
Mid Block between Culver and Triton
1994 =159 ADT
South of Triton
1991 = 112ADT
1996 = 147 ADT
North of Triton
1991 = 118ADT
South of 33rd
1994 = 103 ADT
Quail Avenue
North of Culver
1987 = 106 ADT
South of Culver
1987 = 70 ADT
Regent Avenue
South of Culver
1987 = 1087 ADT
2007 = 1320 ADT
North of Culver
1987 = 636 ADT
2007 = 960 ADT
North of 33rd
1988 = 635 ADT
2007 = 1200 ADT
South of 33rd
1988 = 526 ADT
2002 = 1370 ADT
2007 = 880 ADT
South of Duluth Street at Scheid Park
1996 = 1256 ADT
Noble Avenue
At Triton
1994 = 2884 ADT
South of 33rd
1985 = 2825 ADT
1987 = 2850 ADT
1993 = 2800 ADT
1995 = 3100 ADT
2005 = 4200ADT
South of 34th
1985 = 3750 ADT
07/27/2007
1987 = 3450 ADT
1995 = 2914ADT
1997 = 3611 ADT
2001 = 5293 ADT
Page 3 of3
Golden Valley Road between Lilac Drive and Toledo Avenue near Scheid Park
2005 = 421 ADT
It should be noted that Noble Avenue south of Culver Road was reconstructed in 1994 and north of Culver Road
in 2005. Any traffic counts taken on adjacent streets during those reconstruction projects were taken after
reconstruction was completed in the fall.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this e-mail, or the 2008-2009 PMP projects.
Jeff Oliver, PE
City Engineer
City of Golden Valley
Phone: 763.593.8034
Fax: 763.593.3988
e-mail: joliver@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
07/2712007
Page 1 of3
Oliver, Jeff
"'~~..~...._-,..-...._---"..,_.""..,.~-,-_..""...-........._,-~~---_.-----..._.....v.~....,~.__.....~...,.~...'_.".O....__._......_.._.M....._.......w.._._.__._"_._......._~_...__.._....._........_..._'_..___........_....-.._.___._......,.....".~..._"_..h.....H_".....~~_.._.
From: ROBERT R HAGEN [ROBERTR735@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June OS, 2007 4:49 PM
To: Oliver, Jeff
Subject: Re: proposed changes to Culver Road
Mr. Oliver,
thank you for your response.
Please direct all future email correspondence to my home email address: BOBERTR735@MSN.ce>ffi
Thank you.
- Original Message --
From: Oliver. Jeff
To: ROBERT R HAGEN
Cc: Bob.Hagen; Clancy. Jeannine; Nims. Ron; Mike Kotila
Sent: Tuesday, June OS, 2007 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: proposed changes to Culver Road
Mr. Hagen:
The following is a response, in numerical order, to your May 30, 2007 e-mail regarding the proposed 2008-
2009 Pavement Management Program (PMP) and Culver Road.
1) Staff anticipates that the proposed sidewalk on Culver Road would be located on the south side of
the street in order to minimize any potential impacts to trees, landscaping, etc.
2) At this point in the preliminary project design a boulevard width has not been determined. The width,
or presence, of a boulevard will be determined based upon resident input, the need for on street
parking, potential impacts, and safety. The minimum boulevard width to have vegetation survive is
four feet.
3) The City standard for sidewalk width is six feet if the sidewalk is separated from the street and eight
feet if the sidewalk is located at the back of curb.
4) All sidewalk improvements will be constructed within the existing 60 foot wide street right-of-way for
Culver Road, therefore, no property will be taken from your lot. The amount of the existing boulevard
between the existing street edge and your property line that is incorporated into the project design will
be based .."on the factors discussed in 2) above.
5) At this time we cannot tell you if the tree in your front yard will be removed as part of this project. It is
our goal to preserve as many of the existing trees as possible with any street reconstruction project.
However, if the final design requires removal of any trees, the City has a tree replacement program
that includes the ability for affected property owners to plant the replacement trees anywhere on their
lot.
6) We have not received any requests to widen Culver Road. Because Culver Road is part of Golden
Valley's Municipal State Aid system, the final street width will be a function of the need for on street
parking that residents feel is needed. This information will be discussed with residents at upcoming
meetings.
7) Staff is not aware of any requests to construct a sidewalk on Culver Road.
8) As discussed above, the final street design has not been determined yet, and it is expected that all
improvements will be constructed within the existing 60 foot wide street right-of-way.
9) The final street width is not expected to have an impact on traffic volumes on Culver Road. Although
street width and the presence (or lack of) on-street parking can impact vehicle speeds, it has not been
our experience that a significant increase in traffic speeds occurs following street reconstruction.
There are measures that could potentially be incorporated into the design to help control traffic
speeds. These measures can be discussed at future meetings regarding this project.
10) To our knowledge, there have been no studies performed investigating interrelationships between
construction of sidewalks and global warming.
11) There is additional storm water runoff created by the construction of sidewalks. However, it has been
07/27/2007
Page 2 of3
the City's practice in the P$st to minimize widening of streets and reduce impervious surfaces to the extent
possible with street designs. As discussed above, the need for on street parking on Culver Road also
has an impact on street width, and the amount of storm water runoff. These factors are always
considered in the design of a street.
12) Sidewalk construction has occurred for a number of years within the City. of Golden Valley I both as
separate projects and as part of PMP projects. Examples of sidewalk construction near your home
include Noble Avenue both north and south of Culver Road, and on Golden Valley Road south of
Duluth Street (near Scheid Park). Other recent examples can be seen on Meadow Lane (south of
Highway 55), Olympia Street (between Douglas Drive and Winnetka Avenue), and Plymouth Avenue
(west of Winnetka Avenl,le).
13) As discussed above, it is anticipated that all improvements will be constructed within the existing 60
foot wide right-of-w$y for Culver Road. Therefore, there is no compensation for loss of property.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, permits City's to specially assess properties in an amount no
greater th$t the benefit to a property. Therefore, if you feel that the constructed project h$s a negative
impact on your property value, you may appeal the special assessment in the courts.
One of the gO$ls of street reconstruction projects in Golden V$lIey is to design $ street that best meets the
needs of the residents on the street and the City as a whole. In order to work towards that goal the City will be
scheduling meetings for property owners along Culver Road to discuss the proposed sidewalk, street widths,
the need for on-street parking and other project issues in the near future. You will receive a letter in the mail
inviting you to that meeting. In the mean time, if you have any additional questions regarding this project
please feel free to call me at the numbers below, or any member of the Public Works staff at 763.593.8030.
Jeff Oliver, PE
City Engineer
City of Golden Valley
Phone: 763.593.8034
Fax: 763.593.3988
e-mail: joliver@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
From: ROBERT R HAGEN [mailto:ROBERTR735@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:24 PM
To: Nims, Ron; OliVer, Jeff
Cc: Bob.Hagen
Subject: proposed changes to Culver Road
My wife and I were sorry we missed the open house meetings the city held last week on the
above. We wanted to be there but had to go out of town.
We are 23+ year residents of 4815 Culver Road where we have built many lasting friendships
and a strong, crime-free community. It is truly with great sadness that we read of the proposals
that would dramatically alter the nature of our street and our neighborhood.
If the proposals are fully enacted, CUlver Road will be turned into a major thoroughfare, akin to
Noble Avenue. Those living on Noble Avenue knew the basic nature of their immediate environs
before they moved there. If fully realized, the proposals for Culver Avenue would put a sidewalk
eight steps within our front window. This is not acceptable. It is tantamount to turning Culver
Road into 36th Avenue in Crystal. Have you seen how close to the sidewalk the houses are?
Would you like to live in such proximity to a sidewalk, much less a road? We certainly don't.
With these thoughts in mind, we would appreciate your prompt response to the following
questions:
1.1 f you add a sidewalk to Culver Road, on what side of the street would it be placed?
2.Ho w wide would a boulevard be, if any?
3.Ho w wide would a sidewalk be?
4. What I s the maximum number of feet that would be taken from our lot if the road were
widened to the fullest allowable extent, a gutter and curb added, a boulevard added and a
sidewalk added?
07/27/2007
Page 3 of3
5.Woul d this necessitate the removal of any of our 55-year-old trees In our front yard?
6.Hav e you received any requests from neighborhood residents to widen Culver Road?
7.Hav e you received any requests from neighborhood residents to add a sidewalk?
8.What wo uld be the maximum number of feet taken from our lot if a boulevard and
sidewalk were added on our side of the street?
9.We experience a substantial number of cars speeding on Culver Road. What would the
affect be on traffic volume and speeding were Culver Road to be widened?
10. Since scientists expect higher temperature and more droughts due to global warming,
have you considered the impact of added heat sinks to our quality of life?
11. How much more hard surface runoff will be created by the addition of a sidewalk, curb and
gutter, and possible widening of the road?
12. Where have similar projects been completed in Golden Valley? What has been the
differential affect on property values of adjacent residences?
13. To what extent would the property owner be compensated for reduction in useable lot size
and the reduction in property value due to this loss or the damage to the property's
aesthetic appeal, including damage to mature trees?
Thank you for your prompt response to these questions.
Sincerely,
Sheila Bahl and Robert Hagen
07/27/2007
Page 1 of]
Clancy, Jeannine
,..................MM_.........'.:-~.M."._.'_..M._........._...,..._..._... .,~_..........,......._;,.......... ~...__..__.__.....,___..__.......,...._..~.~_.__..._.............._..__....._.......-..._......"._...._.P.....__......,,__.....~.._....._.._......__..~...,....................,...."......,._..__............_._""H..........._.............P...,._.___.._...._.._..._...._,...._........__._.....~._..__.__"
From: ROBERT R HAGEN [ROBERTR735@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07,20075:45 PM
To: Clancy, Jeannine
MS. Clancy,
Thank.you for your response.
I would like to request the most recent car/truck traffic volumes that DO NOT indude the interval when Culver
Road was used as a detour for Noble because of Noble's reconstruction and DO NOT Include intervals one month
on either side of the reconstruction interval for the following streets. I would appreciate it if you would provide
the time interval used in the measure for each street.
. Culver Road
. Orchard Avenue
. Perry Avenue
. Noble Avenue
. Regent Avenue
. Quail Avenue
. The street by Scheid Park referenced in Tuesday night's Council discussions
If possible, we would like the traffic volume on Culver between Noble and Regent and volumes between
Culver north to 32nd street for the remaining streets listed.
If this is not exactly possible, but you have traffic volumes for these streets elsewhere, please provide the
volumes specify the location at which the traffic was measured.
Thank you very much.
Robert Hagen
07/27/20(17
Page 1 of
Clancy, Jeannine
From: ROBERT R HAGEN [ROBERTR735@msn.comJ
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:22 PM
To: Clancy. Jeannine
Subject: meeting minutes of the Sidewalk Committee where Culver Road project was discussed
Good evening Ms. Clancy,
Thank you for getting back to me this afternoon. I was sorry I missed you.
I would appreciate it if you would send the above to me at this email address:RI::IAGf.N735@M5-fi.~QID
If you have any questions, I can be reached during the day at 612-348-7465 or in the evening at 763-521-
3043.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Robert Hagen
q /27/2007
Page 1 of3
Oliver, Jeff
From: Clancy, Jeannine
Sent: Tuesday. July 10,2007 7:57PM
To: Burt, Tom
Cc: Oliver. Jeff; Nims. Ron
Subject: RE: Proposed Pavement Expansion and Sidewalk Construction Along Culver Road - Second Letter
Tom:
The Culver Road newsletter addressed these questions:
1. That it is anticipated that the sidewalk would be constructed within the public right of way;
2. The County Assessor indicates that sidewalks have no negative impacts on property values; and,
3. The sidewalk will connect to a walk on Noble, not to the east. The trail that he notes was recommended in
the Parks Trail Plan after the street was reconstructed. The trail system that he refers to really
underdeveloped.
We will review these at the neighborhood meeting.
Jeannine Clancy
Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley. MN 55427
Phone: 763.593.8035
Fax: 763.593.3988
TTY: 763.593.3968
Email: jclancy@ci.golden-valley.mn.us
..,.- . _..,.._...~... ""._.,. ....h...._.~_......__~..,.~__...~_".........w~.__..,.,.............~_..........~".._.- . ..~-~...~.,-~.,-...,_. _.__.-, .,~._,....,.."._,__...v .......... ~.r.-_._..,...... _..... ~__'_'__"'.'"~'_'_''''' .~....._......... .... .._Q.........._............_..._n.. ......_._..:_............,......,;.__................ Y' ...~......__..........~_..."w,..._......'...._M.._.,"'~...__w..
From: Burt, Tom
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:44 PM
To: Claney, Jeannine; Oliver, Jeff; Nims, Ron
Subject: FW: Proposed Pavement Expansion and Sidewalk Construction Along Culver Road - Second Letter
Importance: High
Has anyone responded to this? This same individual had ) 0 more questions at the Tuesday Council Meeting.
Tom
.~,w...,_._~......... ~~.~"",,,._~..._..'._.vw..,.._~.."""._..._~ _,..,.. ", ~.__,,__.. .
From: Freiberg, Mike
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:44 AM
To: Burt, Tom; aaney, Jeannine; Nims, Ron
Cc: berger451@msn.com
Subject: FW: Proposed Pavement Expansion and Sidewalk Construction Along Culver Road - Second Letter
Importance: High
Tom:
This is the e-mail that was mentioned at the council meeting on Tuesday. Could you or Jeannine or Ron respond
to the resident? Thank you in advance.
Mike Freiberg
Golden Valley City Council
.. -..- . .. '. ..- ._. .. . ' ..... -.... _.. .__..,....~ . ..' ..- .... ..... .........._..........~...... ....... ......,.~._.. ..h...._. _"'~""'h"_'~"""'_""'''~'''__'""""_,,,,~,_,,,,,,,, ~..._.._._..........~ ...~
From: MICHAEL BERGER [mailto:berger451@msn.com]
Sent: Sun 7/1/2007 5:03 PM
07/27/2007
Page 2 of3
TO: Loomis, Linda; Freiberg, Mike; Pentel, Paula; Scanlon, PeDe; Shaffer, Bob; Nims, Ron
Subject: Proposed Pavement Expansion and Sidewalk Construction Along Culver Road - Second Letter
To the Mayor, City Council and Staff of Golden Valley.
Thank you for YO\Jr June 28 Update Letter addressing proposed pavement expansion and sidewalk
construction projects along Culver Road. Even with this Update letter, I have concerns and serious
reservations.
Repavement and Sidewalk Construction Scenarios Will Take Residential ProDerty
In e-mail correspondence dated May 31, 2007 from Ron NimstoJanell Siegfried, Mr. Nims stated
the Minn. Dept. of Transportation (MnDOT) geometric standards for an undivided urban street were
as follows:
No Parking on street - 28' from face of curb to face of curb
Parking on one side - 34'
Parking on both sides - 40'
Mr. Nims went on to state that although these were not minimum widths (minimum is 2' narrower
for each scenario) these were MnDOT recommended widths. Mr. Nims also indicated the Culver
Road right-of-way (ROW) was 60' wide and existing pavement was approximately centered within
the ROW. Mr. Nims continued by stating the City's standard for sidewalks is 6' wide, with a
minimum of S'of space between the curb and the walk to place driveway aprons. Further, Mr. Nims
anticipated the proposed sidewalk and bOl,Jlevard would be placed on the South side of Culver Road
to avoid overhead utilities.
Assuming existing pavement is centered within the 60' ROWand expansion cannot occur on the
North side of the Culver Road ROW due to overhead utilities, proposed expansion scenarios would
take private residential property. With a 60' ROW centered along the existing roadway, only 30' of
ROW Is available South of the ROW centerline for proposed construction. Culver Road is currently
28.5' wide, edge of asphalt to edge of asphalt, In front of my property (approximately 14 feet
North and South of the ROW centerline). If Culver Road is repaved to 28' wide, requiring 14' on
each side of the ROW centerline, and 11' feet of boulevard/sidewalk Is added to the ROW's South
side, then expansion could fit within the existing ROW (14' feet pavement and 11'
Sidewalk/boulevard fits within 30' ROW South of centerline). However, if Culver Road Is repaved to
be 34' wide, requiring 20 feet of pavement South of the ROW centerline, and 11 feet of
sidewalk/boulevard is added, then proposed construction would take l' of adjacent residential
property. Further, if Culver Road is repaved to be 40' wide, requiring 26' of pavement South of the
ROW centerline, and 11' of Sidewalk/boulevard is added, then proposed construction would take 7'
of adjacent residential property . Even using the slightly different street measurements provided in
the June 28 Update Letter, the third scenario would result in a residential property taking. As one
of many potentially effected residents, do I need to have a private property appraisal conducted or
take any actions to protect my property Interests?
Culver Road Repavement ProJects. Have B_e.en-Im;onsistent
I understand Culver Road is a State Aid street and proposed construction project is designed to
meet State requirements in order to obtain State Aid funding. Culver Road, just East of Noble
Avenue, was repaved within recent years to include curb and gutter additions, but not sidewalk or
boulevard. This section of Culver Road is 29.8' wide from top of curb to top of curb, but is not
designated as a "No Parking" area. Is this portion of Culver Road also a State Aid street? If so, why
does it not meet MnDOT geometric standards? If not, was it "de-listed" from State Aid? Was State
Aid funding used for any repavement or construction along this section of Culver Road? Why have
there been apparent inconsistent approaches to proposed paving and construction projects along
Culver Road?
07/27/2007
There is an existing sidewalk and trail system along both Westbend and Minnaqua that link the
Highway 100 pedestrian footbridge to Regent Avenue. The proposed sidewalk expansion along
Culver would not connect with these developed systems and would seem to serve no purpose.
Moreover, if the stated intent of the proposed sidewalk construction along Culver Road is to link
trail systems,. then why was a sidewalk and boulevard not constructed along Culver Road east of
Noble Avenue to link to the adjacent wooded park and trail system?
Loss of Apparent Lot Size and Increased Traffic Flow Affects on Property Values
In the June 28 Update Letter, the claim was made that Mr. Robert Winge, the Hennepin County
Principal Appraiser, did not see the market reflect a positive or negative value for a sidewalk. Does
this claim address sidewalk expansions or additions into established neighborhoods? Does this
claim account for losses in apparent residential lot size or increased traffic flow patterns? What
data supports Mr. Robert Winges' claim?
Sidewalk and Boulevard Maintenance
The June 28 Update Letter indicated the City would clear snow from the proposed sidewalk. Who
will be responsible for future sidewalk maintenance and repair? Who will be responsible for
maintaining any boulevard, including noxious weed control? Who retains liability relating to
accidents or injuries within the sidewalk and/or boulevard areas?
I appreciate the City's efforts in making information available to its residents. I would appreciate
responses to issues raised in this and my previous correspondence. I look forward to our continued
involvement with this project.
Sincerely,
Mike Berger
4915 Culver Road
07/27/2007
-hL6 GJ~
e ~I d{ (Jf/J1. P
Culver Road Neighborhood Meeting
July 18, 2007
6:30pm - 8:30 pm
. Welcome & Overview
. Presentations
. Questions & Concerns
. Summary/Conclusion
Introduction:
Bonnie Morey - Facilitator
Jeff Oliver - City Engineer
Tom May - Hennepin County Assessor
Mike Kotila - Transportation Engineer, SEH
Sue Mason - Project Manager, SEH
AI Lundstrom - Environmental Coordinator, City Forester
Jeannine Clancy - Director of Public Works
Paul Olson - Engineering Technician
Devin Kubik - Engineering Intern/Note Taker
Presentation: Jeff Oliver, Mike Kotila, Sue Mason)
. Expected outcome? To figure out what sidewalk/road design best suits
residents
. Staff will be recommending sidewalk in feasibility report because it is included in
the City's Comprehensive Plan.
. Council will have final decision as to whether the sidewalk is built or not.
. Sidewalk must meet Americans with Disabilities Act standards.
. City removes snow from sidewalk
. Sidewalk is in ROW so it is City's liability for any injuries
. Traffic Volume: No reason to expect traffic flow increase due to proposed
improvements.
G:\PROJECTS\2()()8.9 PMP (08-1 )\Culver Road\Culver Rd Neighborhood Mtg 071807.doc
. Traffic Speed: Currently 85% drivers at or below speed limit
. Safety: 2002-06 only 3 vehicular crashes, sidewalk gets pedestrian out of the
road and is safer
. Sidewalks have not been shown to increase/decrease property values according
to the Hennepin County Assessor
. Northwest suburbs of Minneapolis are examples of area with sidewalks
. Culver Road is a Municipal State Aid (MSA) street. Therefore if MSA funding is
used, a 26 foot wide street will have no parking with sidewalk on south side
. 32 foot wide street would have parking on the north side of street
. 26 foot road with sidewalk would have 10 trees and a number of shrubs affected
. 32 foot road with sidewalk would have 23 trees and a number of shrubs affected
. Staff would like to further work with the neighborhood to reduce the impact of the
proposed improvements on trees and shrubs.
. Possibility of a "parking bay" like one constructed on Golden Valley Rd between
Douglas and Hwy 100
. There will be tree and shrub replacement if there are any impacts. One large
tree would possibly get two 2.5" shade trees in return. One small tree would get
one 2.5" tree in return
. Trees would have a warranty of two years
Questions/Concerns:
. Resident at 5037 Culver
Can there be a smaller sidewalk and street parking?
Response: ADA requires that there be 4 feet of sidewalk behind the 4 foot
concrete driveway aprons. It is possible to make it smaller, but more challenges
with the driveway aprons and sidewalk slopes to meet ADA standards.
. Resident at 5325 Culver
Sidewalk on Lilac not used, and it is dangerous. How are the trails connecting?
Why was the path considered?
Response: Concrete strip along Lilac is not a sidewalk, but a maintenance strip.
Use of Dawnview/Scott is apossibility for tie-in with trail and pedestrian bridge.
. When the Culver Road east of Noble Avenue was redone why was there not a
sidewalk?
Response:. A sidewalk or trail was not recommended on Culver Road east of
Noble until after the reconstruction was complete.
. Resident at 4937 Culver
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Culver Road\Culver Rd Neighborhood Mtg 071807.doc
When was the last time the sidewalk plan was feviewedlrevised?
Response: 1998.
. Resident at 5037 Culver
Wouldn't losing size of lot increase/decrease value?
Response: Road and sidewalk construction is in the City's right-of-way (ROVlt?
and you won't be losing any actual size to lot. Also sidewalks have not been
shown to increase/decrease property value.
. Resident at 4815 Culver
Between Regent and Quail how can you handle the steep grade? Sand/salt in
winter? Why wouldn't you extend a different trail?
Response: The sidewalk would be used at the user's discretion. Sidewalks are
plowed, but not sanded or salted.
. Resident at 5027 Culver
Would sidewalk be closed in wi~ter on steep grade?
Response: Unlikely.
. Does the community count? Don't want sidewalk. Why is city recommending
one?
Response: Staff must follow Comprehensive Plan. Council has decision to vary
from adopted plans and choose to eliminate sidewalk.
. Resident at 2905 Regent
Is there an estimate of square footage of concrete? How will it affect water/rain
runoff etc?
Response: Don't have an answer right now. In general there is a decrease of
impervious surface during PMP projects.
. Resident at 5360 Culver
Why change street if it's already safe?
Response: It was not suggested the street would be less safe. Need for
sidewalks is more of a "system wide" need. It is an opportunity to get
pedestrians off the street. Can't predict future traffic affects.
. Resident at 5047 Culver
What's the point of the feasibility report?
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1 )\Culver Roacl\Culver Rd Neighborhood Mtg 071807.doc
Response: The neighborhood or staff does not make the final decision on
project. Elected council members will take the information from feasibility report
to make decision. Staff cannot change Comprehensive Plan. Staff is
recommending this design to see if it's feasible. Staff is about 25% into the
design process.
. Resident at 5365 Culver
Have there been any pedestrian counts done?
Response: None.
. Resident at 5305 Culver
Has anyone requested a sidewalk?
Response: Unknown.
. Resident at 5027 Culver
How can you make a recommendation without knowing how many people use
the walk? Can you predict new walkers so you can figure out the cost per
walker?
Response: Cannot predict new walkers. Need to provide off stre.t access for
pedestrians and provide connections. Past history suggests that as sidewalks are
built in the community they are used.
. Resident at 4815 Culver
Without state funds what would be the cost of construction for the city be?
Response: Unknown
. Minimum width for roads to receive state funding?
Response: 26 foot wide absolute minimum. 28 foot recommended minimum. If
you do not meet absolute minimum, will not receive funding.
. Resident at 5325 Culver
What would happen if Council takes Culver off street aid?
Response: The City would need to new location for mileage. Not many streets
meet requirements for MSA designation.
. Resident at 2905 Regent
Total cost of 8' sidewalk?
Response: Unknown at this point.
. Resident at 2085 Regent
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1)\Culver Road\Culver Rd Neighborhood Mtg 071807.doc
How much of citizen's concerns are brought to consideration? How will proposal
affect citizens.
Response: Staff and consultants are not stakeholders. It is negligent to not
advance plans. Everything will be submitted to the City Council, who will make
final decision regarding building the sidewalk.
. If streets are kept same width etc will city loose funding?
Response: Not building to MSA standards will cause loss of construction funding
for the project.
. Comments: Reconstruction is what triggers MSA road design minimum widths
and standards. Staff does not have the power to change adopted
Comprehensive Plan.
Community Input on Parking and Street Width:
. Would like road as narrow as possible
. Parking is good. Needed with so many single lane driveways.
. Would like parking on both sides
. Would like parking on one side
. Don't like aesthetics of sidewalk along curb
. Narrow as much as possible without parking
. Surmountable curb
. Narrow as much as possible. No sidewalk
. Have staff consider a pervious sidewalk
. Want speed bumps so drivers stop going through stop sign
G:\PROJECTS\2008-9 PMP (08-1 )\Culver Road\Culver Rd Neighborhood Mtg 071807.doc
.,
'_-"":"',,~~.':, :;,;;-.~...:~:...-:,-
~ PDf:'-\-
q/13J01
~~y
.A
~ \C/,Ol
~
~ (}t:f - bt{ P /11,p
1
Triton Drive
o Challenges. . continued .
-;,> now stop si;J!l~ or uncontrolled crossings
Impasts
.. I S.:'~1::;tC:; ? j'{-(- ?,"j :~~. ~~:l:U::~. [;"" c::\'
p':lpe'i)
. Hem:w,' aq(j 11"1" '~e eSllfll?t'od 10,)' of 8'''St1Qg
rGtalilJ:l~ \",a!'
o 1 steEp d'IVe\'.',.))'
. Relocate apflrDXrmatc:l}' .GO of woo:! fe"ce
. Relocate apP'D'''l11atel,' 50' of wood fence and
planlrngs
Dawnview Terrace
Challenges
-- No traffiC control at Regent
. New stop sign or uncontrolled crossing
- One new stop sign or uncontrolled crossing
at local street
- Impacts
. Eslimated Ii trees and 12 shrubs on city
propert y
. 4 steep dnvewal's
. Eslimated 325 feel of retaining wall on city
propert,'
Triton Drive
o Challenges
Noble frontage Road
. f\etalqlng Wall
. No Crll' Proper11' (1Igill-of-way) for off street
s!dc\Val~
- On-street to north and south
. NOI1h:
- Nc-.': m:ci-bI8::k, ulronlrDlied C10SS'llg 01 N;Ju!c' or ne\'.
stor' 5191\
. South
- [),fi,CUI! Cf05SI~lg at NJblc.;.!j rentage an.j CIJ:Vc', can
bE- addressed
-- Reconstructed and restored in 1998 without
sidewalk
2
Bassett Creek Drive
o Challenges
- Existing uncontrollrod crosswalk at !\Joble, or
add new stop sign
- Uncontrolled crossing at Regent or add
new stop sign
-Impacts estimated 2 trees and 8 shrubs on
city property
- On-street handicapped parking at church
- 3 steep dnveways
"- Estimated 25. of retaining wall on city
property
- Relocate fire hydrant
Pervious Concrete Sidewalk
. Disadvantages
Mus: use qJalifled hstalle!. !lot tl'picallnstaliation
More than double tile cost of typical concrete waif,
. Cu:~'.::-r SjO';.O~O p~'v;a,JS vs S4'~.O~)Q tW'J!ca:
Requires extensive under drainage sl'stem
adjacenllo streel (Included above)
- [<0 ugh surface
-' When voids are salurated. freezino can cause
severe damage in only a few cycles
- Open structure may make it more susceptible to
salt damage
- North Carolina & 1 ennessee have 10 years of
historl'. Minnesota has little history .
- Clogging from sand - needs routine maintenance
. Prc5surcv:ash and VC3::ULJ:11
. New equipm::nl would h8VC to be purchased or ten"led
3
Special Assessment History
State Aid Streets with Sidewalks
. History
- Jcr-sey fwc,nuc (L2urcl to G!onwood)
~ H(<;";:-."u--:~c:-,; l'-' j;):i: I;] us', S:d~lda~o:-,
e S:](:\...'ak C"; CC:l~l ~..jt..:
o h~SA f J:1:L use,:,
.. fv1SA r(-;~.Idl'n!;al rate CiSSC:SS0d
- Noble fwenue (Golden Valle)' Hoad to
Culver f-\oad)
. R8consl: uc:ted In 199[, to MSf, standards
.. Sid8\\'ali-. on \V2St side
. MSA lunds used
.. MSA residential rate assessed
Special Assessment History
State Aid Streets with Sidewalks
. Special Assessment Policy adopted by
Council in Februarj! 1995
- Per unit assessment for residential property
- State Aid . credit' of 75% for homes 011
mUlllClpal stale aid (fIliSf-\) streets due to
traffiC volumes
- TI18refore 110n18s on flliSf\ streets pay 25%
of tile amount paid by homes on local
streets
Special Assessment History
State Aid Streets with Sidewalks
. Hlstor-y
Olylllr1a Str8et (F'Cllll",ylvi-mla to J(~rsey
ind Fi::wd2 tel Douglos)
~ f-~C'~.)'l:;~' ,~-:-:~.~':, :~~ ;:Ll.ll~,-=.d !0 L1S/\ Sl2~"darjs
. SidC::\'\'dlh 0:; SClU:ll ::Ic1l'-:
g ~l} 'ight-cr-\'.'~} I OU:S<~fla to D~)uQlas
. f~o r.1Sf, f,JIlj" usej
~ 100{}" 1~)C;1! re::;lde:lll?1 fale ass[~ssC;d (no r~~Sf~
cred::)
Recommendation
. Regent Avenue
- 28- wide street
- 8- wide sidewalk adjacent to west curb
. Sidewalk Width Icdu2ed wherc pOSSible 10 avoid
Impacts
-- Centering mass in City right-of-way to the
extent possible to minimize impacts
4
Recommendation
. Culver Road
- 26" wide street
. State aid standalds and assessments need to
be determined
- 8" wide Sidewalk adjacent to south curb
. SidewalK Wldlh reduced wheee possible to avoid
impacts
- No sidewalk on Culver between Regent
and Lilac DI-ive
- Connection to Highway 100 pedestrian
bndge t11rougll existing city property
(Dawn view alignment) between Regent and
Scott Avenue, cOnnecting to existing
asphalt trail
5