The URL can be used to link to this page

06-09-09 CM Agenda Packet AGENDA Council/Manager Meeting Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room June 9, 2009 6:30 pm 1. 2009 Pavement Management: Request for Secondary Driveway 2. Bremer Grant Submission 3. Discontinuation of Valley Square Tax Increment District 4. Parking Restrictions in the Vicinity of Lions Park 5. Neighborhood Process for Design of Wayzata Boulevard (France Avenue to South City Limits) 6. Commercial Recycling 7. Council Salaries 8. Minneapolis Charter Commission Letter 9. 2010 Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Budget Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed for the Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and provide general directions to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and listen to the discussion; public participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council. This document is available in alternate formats upon a 72-hour request. Please call 763-593-8006 (TTY: 763-593-3968) to make a request. Examples of alternate formats may include large print, electronic, Braille, audiocassette, etc. Hey emorandum Public Works 763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting June 9, 2009 Agenda Item 1. 2009 Pavement Management: Request for Secondary Driveway Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Summary Public Works staff has received a letter from Mr. Sheldon Resig, 4900 Bassett Creek Drive, to retain a secondary driveway to the rear of his home. Mr. Resig's May 28, 2009 letter is attached to this memorandum for reference. The subject property has a full driveway into a double garage from Bassett Creek Drive. The secondary driveway, which is surfaced with gravel, is from Perry Avenue and extends to the back door of the home. Photographs showing the two driveways to this home are also attached to this memorandum for reference. Staff has investigated the Resig's request following receipt of the attached letter and made the following findings: 1. There are no handicap vehicle licenses or permits for any of the vehicles licensed to the Resigs. 2. The home is a rambler, with both driveways accessing the same floor of the home. Therefore, equal access is available into the home from both driveways. 3. The homeowners have the ability to have trashcans and recycling containers taken to the street from both driveways. 4. As previously directed by the City Council, staff has consistently eliminated secondary driveways to rear yard areas as part of PMP projects. Based upon these findings, staff determined that no hardship is present at the Resig residence and the request to retain the secondary driveway was denied. The Resigs have requested that the City Council review their request. Staff is requesting guidance from the City Council on this issue. Attachments Letter addressed to Jeff Oliver, City Engineer, dated May 28, 2009 (1 page) Photographs of 4900 Bassett Creek Drive (3 pages) Letter addressed to Mr. Sheldon Resig, dated June 3,2009 (1 page) SI-IELDON RESIG 4900 Bassett Creek Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 763-588-3696 RECEIVEL; . MAY 292009 I) BY: May 28, 2009 Jeff Oliver, PE City Engineer 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427-4588 Dear Mr. Oliver: Re: Your letter of May 20, 2009 and phone conversation of May 26, 2009 Elimination of my secondary driveway will be a hardship for me and my wife. My wife had cancer surgery about three years ago that took the muscle from her right leg. we installed a hand rail to assist her walking down the back stairs to access the yard and driveway. The driveway is used for access to the house for deliveries and service calls for repairs. CenterPoint Energy used the driveway during the current Pavement Management Program to move the gas meter from inside the house to outside the house. The driveway is the only way I have to get my trash container to the street for weekly pick-up. I can site many other uses over the thirty-seven years that I have occupied this house. My secondary driveway appears to meet the criteria of item three of your letter. I do not understand how my driveway meets your definition of a boulevard. Sincerely, > )~ ({tM1 t Sheldon Resig, PE " "lle WWIJP.d.gokkn-w/ky.mn./IS Y EJ f I LEe c ;~ 'I HAND DELIVERED June 3, 2009 Mr. Sheldon Resig 4900 Bassett Creek Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 Subject: Secondary Driveway 2009 Pavement Management Program Dear Mr. Resig: City of Golden Valley staff has reviewed your request to retain the secondary driveway to your property. This secondary driveway is the gravel driveway located on the Perry Avenue side of your property, and provides access to the back door of your home. Consistent with City policy to eliminate secondary driveways and boulevard parking areas, staff has determined that no hardship is present at your property, and your request has therefore been denied. The City's contractor will be installing concrete curb and gutter across this driveway and restoring the boulevard area with sod. If you wish to appeal this decision to the Golden Valley City Council, please contact Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works, at 763.593.8035. eff Oliver, PE 6ity Engineer Cc: Tom Burt, City Manager Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Brian Dahlberg, Engineering Technician G:\PROJECTS\2009 PMP (09-01)\Correspondence Project 09-1\Resig Drwy 060109.docx alley Memorandum City Administration/Council 763-593-8003 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting June 9, 2009 Agenda Item 2. Bremer Grant Submission Prepared By Thomas Burt, City Manager Summary Mayor Loomis asked that this item be placed on the agenda. Attachments Draft - Minnesota Local Human Rights Project Grant Form (3 pages) DRAFT Minnesota Local Human Rights Project Grant Form Instructions You may fill out this form in Adobe Acrobat Reader (digitally), or print it first and then fill it out by hand. Make sure you keep a copy for yourself. Mail your completed form to: Mario Hernadez, Minnesota Department of Human Rights, 190 East 5th Street, Suite 700, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or fax to: 651-206-9042. Direct your questions to: Mario Hernandez by phone: 651-197-5091; or my email: Mario.hernandez@state.mn.us. NOTE: If you choose to fill this form in digitally, be sure to print it before you close the document. Once you close this document, all your entries will be cleared. General Information Name of Commission Golden Valley Human Rights Commission Location City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 763-593-8000 Fiscal Coordinator Email address Chair of Commission Commission annual budget from city/county Statement of Need Summary Statement of Need The City of Golden Valley has requested assistance from the Human Rights Commission to educate, inform and encourage participation in the upcoming 2010 census. a. Goal The primary goal is to reach as many residents as possible with information about the census process and the means by which they can participate. Special efforts will be made to reach traditionally undercounted citizens in the community such as apartment residents, English-as-a- second-language speakers, and newer residents of the city. 1 DRAFT The secondary goal is to engage and provide a learning experience to young people in schools about the census and it's value to democratic process. b. Expected Outcomes 1. Targeted strategies designed and implemented to reach out, educate and engage traditionally undercounted citizens in the community so that they participate in the 2010 census at the same rate as the general adult community in Golden Valley. 2. Broad strategies designed and implemented to reach out to Golden Valley citizens with the intent to educate and engage them in participating in the 2010 census. 3. Engagement of high-school age youth in designing innovative marketing and publicity campaigns to educate the above populations in the reasons for the census and to motivate them to participate fully in the census process. c. Budget (itemized) 1. Materials and Media Budget, ""We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" Campaign 2. 1st prize: "We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" High School Media Competition 2nd prize: "We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" High School Media Competition 3rd prize: "We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" High School Media Competition Public Recognition of all winners and their campaign ideas. $1,100 175 125 100 d. How does this positively impact the community? The positive impact on Golden Valley ofsupport for a complete and accurate census is: 1. An accurate data base of the Golden Valley population to use by planners of city services over the next decade. 2. An accurate data base of the Golden Valley population to use by county, state and federal planners over the next decade. 3. Greater understanding and inclusion of city residents in a fundamental process of our democracy. 4. A reality-based learning opportunity for high-school students about community diversity and composition, statistics and planning processes necessary for democratic representation. Capacity Building and Outreach Relate the project to your mission or long-term plan, human rights audience, and capacity building. Capacity Building 2 DRAFT By working with the City Council and Planning Department, the Golden Valley Human Rights Commission will forge new skills, contacts and processes in joint planning for the good of our community. By building on the strength of our youth, and engaging them in the census process, the project will build capacity to involve them in concrete issues of ensuring Human Rights. Both of the strategies above build capacity to penetrate barriers and obstacles in understanding our community and thereby foster a civic dialog that will strengthen Human Rights in Golden Valley. Strategic Planning The process of planning and cooperation with the City Council and Planning Department as well as the engagement of various segments of the population and the subsequent census data base will increase the strength and accuracy of future strategic planning by the Golden Valley Human Rights Commission. Social Justice An accurate and complete census of all residents of Golden Valley is fundamental to their inclusion in city services and for solving issues of social justice based on representation Education and Outreach Describe your involvement in this area. How does it relate to capacity building development and/or activity development, for example. The Golden Valley Human Rights Commission will use the following capacity-building strategies and development activities to educate, engage and reach out to the community during the "We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" Census Campaign 1. Meet and coordinate census outreach efforts with the City Council and City Planners of Golden Valley. 2. Develop a spirited competition among high school students to design elements of a media campaign to encourage participation of residents to actively engage in the census process. The competition would solicit high school students to produce and post a one minute Public Service Announcements (PSAs) informing residents of the importance of the census and explaining how they can participate. Media to be considered: radio, i-neighbors, twitter, Community Access TV, posters, utility-billing banners, school-to-home bulletins, brochures, 3. Meet with members of groups who are traditionally undercounted in the census, such as speakers- of-English-as-a-second-Ianguage, apartment residents, group retirement residents, renters, housing for transients, to determine how best to include them in the census. 4. Meet with apartment building owners, social service providers, church and religious leaders, civic groups to expand outreach for the census. 5. Meet with other groups as needed. 3 Instructions You may fill out this form in Adobe Acrobat Reader (digitally), or print it first and then fill it out by hand. Make sure you keep a copy for yourself. Mail your completed form to: Mario Hernadez, Minnesota Department of Human Rights, 190 East 5th Street, Suite 700, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or fax to: 651-206-9042. Direct your questions to: Mario Hernandez by phone: 651-197-5091; or my email: Mario.hernandez@state.mn.us. ftrnende d V e (~rD' f'- I)t~fr1,bL0t7J tlr fo/q/Oq DRAFT Crone, / /rna/l/ljJ,(4(Y Minnesota Local Human Rights Project Grant Form . . J tneel1 (\5 NOTE: If you choose to fill this form in digitally, be sure to print it before you close the document. Once you close this document, all your entries will be cleared. General Information Name of Commission Golden Valley Human Rights Commission Location City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 763-593-8000 Fiscal Coordinator Email address Chair of Commission Commission annual budget from city/county Statement of Need Summary Statement of Need The City of Golden Valley has requested assistance from the Human Rights Commission to educate, inform and encourage participation in the upcoming 2010 census. In each of the five cities the 2000 census had an undercount, missing many persons of color or whose primary language was not English. In the past 5 years our city has increased its diversity both ecumenically and culturally. While there has been increased mobility in the rental apartments, there has been a significant increase in individual home rentals due to the economic downturn. The immigration from Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Liberia as well as the resettlement of the Hmong and Latino populations into this first ring suburban area requires preparation for the census. 1 a. Goal The primary goal is to reach as many residents as possible with information about the census process and the means by which they can participate. Special efforts will be made to reach traditionally undercounted citizens in the community such as apartment residents, English-as-a- second-language speakers, and newer residents of the city. DRAFT The secondary goal is to engage and provide a learning experience to young people in schools about the census and its value to democratic process. b. Expected Outcomes 1. Targeted strategies designed and implemented to reach out, educate and engage traditionally undercounted citizens in the community so that they participate in the 2010 census at the same rate as the general adult community in Golden Valley. 2. Broad strategies designed and implemented to reach out to Golden Valley citizens with the intent to educate and engage them in participating in the 2010 census. 3. Engagement of high-school age youth in designing innovative marketing and publicity campaigns to educate the above populations in the reasons for the census and to motivate them to participate fully in the census process. c. Budget (itemized) 1. Materials and Media Budget, ""We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" Campaign 2. 1st prize: "We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" High School Media Competition 2nd prize: "We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" High School Media Competition $1,100 175 125 3rd prize: "We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" High School Media Competition Public Recognition of all winners and their campaign ideas. 100 d. How does this positively impact the community? The positive impact on Golden Valley of support for a complete and accurate census is: 1. An accurate data base of the Golden Valley population to use by planners of city services over the next decade. 2. An accurate data base of the Golden Valley population to use by county, state and federal planners over the next decade. 3. Greater understanding and inclusion of city residents in a fundamental process of our democracy. 2 4. A reality-based learning opportunity for high-school students about community diversity and composition, statistics and planning processes necessary for democratic representation. Capacity Building and Outreach Relate the project to your mission or long-term plan, human rights audience, and capacity building. Capacity Building DRAFT By working with the City Council and Planning Department, the Golden Valley Human Rights Commission will forge new skills, contacts and processes in joint planning for the good of our community. By building on the strength of our youth, and engaging them in the census process, the project will build capacity to involve them in concrete issues of ensuring Human Rights. Both of the strategies above build capacity to penetrate barriers and obstacles in understanding our community and thereby foster a civic dialog that will strengthen Human Rights in Golden Valley. Strategic Planning The process of planning and cooperation with the City Council and Planning Department as well as the engagement of various segments of the population and the subsequent census data base will increase the strength and accuracy of future strategic planning by the Golden Valley Human Rights Commission. Social Justice An accurate and complete census of all residents of Golden Valley is fundamental to their inclusion in city services and for solving issues of social justice based on representation Education and Outreach Describe your involvement in this area. How does it relate to capacity building development andlor activity development, for example. The Golden Valley Human Rights Commission will use the following capacity-building strategies and development activities to educate, engage and reach out to the community during the "We ALL count in Golden Valley 2010" Census Campaign 1. Meet and coordinate census outreach efforts with the City Council and City Planners of Golden Valley. 3 2. Develop a spirited competition among high school students to design elements of a media campaign to encourage participation of residents to actively engage in the census process. The competition would solicit high school students to produce and post one minute Public Service Announcements (PSAs) informing residents of the importance of the census and explaining how they can participate. Recruit representative high school students from Golden Valley who also represent the diversity of the community who would become a planning team that will design approaches including the internet, my space videos, radio, i-neighbors, twitter, Community Access TV, posters, utility- billing banners, school-to-home bulletins, brochures, and door to door visitations to build trust and openness FOR ALL RESIDENTS IN THE COMMUNITY with the US Census process. Form teams who will recruit others to help deliver flyers, be advocates for the census at shopping centers and do door to door visitations where deemed appropriate. 3. Meet with members of groups who are traditionally undercounted in the census, such as speakers- of-English-as-a-second-Ianguage, apartment residents, group retirement residents, renters, housing for transients, to determine how best to include them in the census. 4. Meet with apartment building owners, social service providers, church and religious leaders, civic groups to expand outreach for the census. 5. Meet with other groups as needed. 4 alley M m ran Finance 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council Manager Meeting June 9, 2009 Agenda Item 3. Discontinuation of Valley Square Tax Increment District Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Staff recommended at the March Workshop the possibility that the City may be able to close the last portion of Valley Square Tax Increment Area called Area B early. It was scheduled to end after 2010 taxes payable for payments of debt in February 2011. Two resolutions need to be passed in order to close the district early. One would call the 2003A and 2003B Tax Increment Bonds for payment in February 2010 and the second resolution would discontinue tax increment payments after taxes payable 2009. Both resolutions would have to be approved on June 16 for submittal to Hennepin County by June 30. With the approval it does make the City liable to make all debt service payments in February, 2010. Currently the district has two delinquent residential parcels for the first half taxes payable 2009. If one commercial property is delinquent in October, the City may need to help pay the last debt service payment. alley Memorandum Public Works 763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting June 9, 2009 Agenda Item 4. Discussion Regarding Parking Restrictions in the Vicinity of Lions Park Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Summary In December 2007, the City Council adopted parking restrictions in the vicinity of Lions Park. These restrictions were in response to neighborhood concerns, which were expressed regarding recreation activities programmed for the facilities in Lions Park. Council directed staff to review the effectiveness of the restrictions and to report to City Council accordingly. Based upon field observations by City Police and Parks and Recreation staff, the parking restrictions appear to be working as anticipated. There were recently complaints regarding failure on the part of the United States Postal Service to deliver mail. Residents have been mailed a follow-up letter from Chief Altonen addressing that concern. Attachments Correspondence from Golden Valley Chief of Police, Stacy Altonen, dated June 1, 2009 (1 page) Lions Park Parking Restrictions map (1 page) June 1, 2009 The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the City of Golden Valley received some complaints about parking around Lions Park in recent weeks. As you may recall, in 2007 the Neighborhood Traffic Safety Committee conducted a comprehensive review of parking-related issues near Lions Park, including meeting with residents to obtain feedback. The current parking restrictions (or lack thereof) are the result of that review and citizen recommendations, all with the goal of providing enjoyment of Lions Park without unreasonably disrupting the livability of area residents. In the event you do encounter perceived parking violations, I would again like to remind you of some common parking restrictions: "Parking is prohibited on a sidewalk, in front of a public or private driveway, within an intersection, within ten feet of the point of the curb nearest the fire hydrant, on a crosswalk, within twenty feet of a crosswalk at any intersection, in a sign-posted fire lane on a public or private property, within thirty feet upon the approach to any flashing beacon, stop sign or traffic control signal located the side of a roadway, at any place where official signs prohibit or restrict stopping, parking or both, on any boulevard, or in public parks between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. except at Brookview Community Center." Residents who believe cars are illegally parked based on one or more of the ordinances listed above should report violations by calling 911. When officers respond, they will assess the situation to determine if a violation exists, and issue a citation and/or have the vehicle towed if applicable. Additionally, it is not illegal to park a vehicle in a manner that blocks a mailbox. However, the United States Postal Service web site indicates postal carriers are expected to make delivery to a blocked mailbox except if the blockage is a persistent occurrence on the part of the resident. The Police Department cannot take any action in the instance of a blocked mailbox, but you should contact the Postmaster if your mail is not delivered due to a vehicle parked in front of the mailbox - according to Postal rules, the carrier is still supposed to make delivery. The City of Golden Valley is committed to encouraging citizen feedback by taking all concerns seriously, to ensure continued safety of our streets and a high livability level within our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Stacy Altonen Golden Valley Chief of Police 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 763-593-8059 saltonen@ci.golden-valley.mn.us Hey Parking Restrictions . . No Parking Print Old.: 1.18'128. 200Q SolCCe.s: Hennepin County Surveyors Offlee for Property Lines (2008). CIty of Golden Vaney for an other Jayer& F:\Uaera\Englneering\ProJects\PartUng Restrictiona\P.~Realrictlon..mxd alley emorandum Public Works 763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting June 9, 2009 Agenda Item 5. Discussion Regarding Neighborhood Process for the Design of Wayzata Boulevard (France Avenue to South City Limits) Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Summary Discussions with neighborhoods located south of Wayzata Boulevard have occurred regarding the appropriate design of the Interstate 394 frontage road in light of the development that is underway in Saint Louis Park (The West End Project). Recently, the City Council received an email from Gary Cohen regarding a process to design the improvements. Staff wishes to discuss Mr. Cohen's request and the status of funding sources for the proposed study and improvements with the City Council. Attachments Email from Gary Cohen, dated May 22,2009 (1 page) From: maccohen@comcast.net [maccohen@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:54 PM To: Loomis, Linda; Shaffer, Bob; Scanlon, DeDe; Freiberg, Mike; Pentel, Paula Subject: South Tyrol traffic meeting - some ideas I've been meaning to send this to all of you since the day of the Golden Valley RunJWalk when I chatted a bit with the mayor about this topic. As of part of the ongoing DukeIWest End development issues - we've still got the South Tyrol traffic issues to deal with. As a part of the latest approvals that traffic meeting is an outstanding requirement. As you may recall, the January 2008 meeting really didn't take us anywhere. That meeting was mostly a "here are the things the city will look at doing" versus a two way discussion on the issues. For the "next" meeting (since we do still have to have one) - here's a thought on a different way to run the next meeting. Rather than have a "here's what we're going to do meeting", I would suggest a more open ended meeting along the lines of the following: 1 ~ AAfter a general introduction period, break the residents in attendance into small groups versus a large group meeting. 2. Have a series of selected topics that each individual group can work on - some suggested topics could be: a. traffic calming devices - speed bumps, cut outs, etc. b. cui de sac concepts - closing of full access from some streets to the frontage road c. intersection signs/signals - use of traffic lights, stop signs to control/direct traffic flow (might need a MnDot type to be involved in this group since we've been told that only MnDot can make some decisions on these items. Each small group would have some time limit to discuss their topic (45 - 60 minutes?). Each small group would need a non-neighbor facilitator to make this work best (bring in some bridge builders to help in this role??). 3. Have each group report back to the larger group as to the ideas discussed in their group. This meeting would certainly be thought provoking and might better serve to see what the neighborhood really thinks. about ways to work with current and future traffic issues. As you know from the various meetings and hearings over the last couple of years, the Duke development merely adds to the already troublesome traffic issues in South Tyrol (from the Kennedy's addition to the east). I know this would be a very different public meeting than most - but this topic is far more vexing than most. This type of format worked during the Envision process.. so it might be worth a try for a neighborhood traffic meeting. Given that summer is upon us soon..,and the retail area is scheduled to open in September...this next meeting does need to take place sooner rather than later. Thank~ for your consideration! ~. . Gary Cohen 4530 Douglas Avenue alley m n u City Administration/Council 763-593-8003 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley CouncillManager Meeting June 9, 2009 Agenda Item 6. Commercial Recycling Prepared By Thomas Burt, City Manager Summary Council Member Scanlon asked that this item be placed on the agenda. Hey Me 0 n m Finance 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting June 9, 2009 Agenda Item 7. Council Salaries Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director/City Clerk Summary As per City Code, Council salaries are reviewed every two years preceding the city election. In 2007, Council proceeded with first consideration of Ordinance No. 368. It did not get a second consideration. Staff is asking for direction on this ordinance again. The last increase was approved in July, 2003 for years 2004 and 2005. Staff provides to the Council the percentage representing the average salary or wage increase for non~union employees for the previous four years. 2006 3.0% 2007 3.5% 2008 3.0% 2009 3.0% Mayor Council Members CURRENT SALARY $11,619 $8,696 If there is direction to proceed, the impact will be reflected in the 2010 and 2011 budget. The Council could so chose to add Health Insurance coverage. This would be considered at the June 16 and July 7 City Council meeting. Attachments City Code Section 2.19 (1 page) Ordinance No. 281 - Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members (1 page) Council MemberSuNey(1 pag~ Mayor SUNey (1 page) 92.19 Section 2.19: Salaries of Mayors and Council Members Subdivision 1 The annual salary of the Mayor shall be $11,619.00. Subdivision 2 The annual salary of each Council Member shall be $8,696.00. Source: Ordinance No. 281, 2nd Series Effective Date: 7-18-03 Subdivision 3. Approved Additional Meetings In addition to their salaries, the Mayor and Council shall be paid $50.00 for each meeting they are directed or designated to attend, up to a maximum of $150.00 per month. The method for approval of meetings shall be outlined by resolution of the Council. Source: Ordinance No. 63, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-25-91 Subdivision 4 The salaries provided for herein shall be effective January 1, 2004. Source: Ordinance No. 281, 2nd Series Effective Date: 7-18-03 Subdivision 5 In April of each odd numbered year, the City's staff shall provide to the Council the percentage representing the average salary or wage increase for City non-union employees for the previous two years so that the Council may consider appropriate increases in its salaries. Source: Ordinance No. 63, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-25-91 Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 281, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code Section 2.19, entitled "Salaries of Mayor and Council Members" is hereby amended to read: Subd. 1. The annual salary of the Mayor shall be $11,619.00. Subd.2. The annual salary of each Council Member shall be $8,696.00. Subd. 4. The salaries provided for herein shall be effective January 1, 2004. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 1 st day of July, 2003. Is/Linda R. Loomis Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Is/Donald G. Taylor Donald G. Taylor, City Clerk Search Results for Council Member. No comparison salary provided. o 00 .00 $7,424.42 $8,696.00 $8,664.00 $5,018.00 $11,500.00 $10,827.00 $9,000.00 $7,266.00 $6,000.00 $7,020.00 n.a. He $40 None N/A NA HealthPartners PEIP $0.00 $0.00 NA $0.00 EDA - $4,299/Yr IAndover IApple Valley I Bloomington I Brooklyn Center I Brooklyn Park I Burnsville IChanhassen IChaska IColumbla Heights ICottage Grove I Crysta I I Eden Prairie I Fridley IGolden Valley I Lakeville I Uno Lakes ! Maple Grove I Maplewood I Minnetonka I Richfield I Rosemount i Roseville I Shakopee I Shoreview I South St. Paul 1St. louis Park I Stillwater I West St. Paul $10,947.00 $17,100.00 $12,000.00 $6,000.00 $8,208.00 $9,000.00 $9,216.00 $9,983.07 $9, $10,2~~. $11,619.00 $9,996.00 $6,272.00 $13,500.00 $12,302.00 $12,000.00 $9,360.00 $8,000.00 $9,300.00 $7,854.00 $8,712.00 $10,200.60 $12,417.00 $9,000.00 n/a 35 pto $40 None None 0 NA $0.00 EDA - $4,299/yr $100 per EDA mtg hlley M mo ndu Public Works 763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting June 9, 2009 Agenda Item 8. Minneapolis Charter Commission Discussions Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Summary Mayor Loomis was contacted by Minneapolis Council Member Paul Ostrow about a proposal before the Minneapolis Charter Commission to replace the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board with an advisory board to the Minneapolis City Council. Mayor Loomis has asked staff to draft a letter that could be sent to Council Member Ostrow pending Golden Valley City Council discussion of the matter. Attachments Draft Letter to Minneapolis Council Member Paul Ostrow, dated June 3, 2009 (2 pages) June 3, 2009 Council Member Paul Ostrow City of Minneapolis 350 S. 5th Street City Hall, Room 307 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Dear Council Member Ostrow: Thank you for this opportunity to com Minneapolis Charter Commission di the Golden Valley City Council wo ssing an native, inneapolis Pa(~(and dvisory board that aspects of park ncil has discussed rk planning and ga ng maintenance , majority of Theodore aries of the City of Golden ected officials are keenly which would best manage nts from Golden Valley, Minneapolis and oth ofte mented on the current state of disrepair of sev h Par . Examples include the condition of the trails, str ing, and parkway roads. In addition, drainage issues affe and Glenwood Avenue, which is a county road, have been an Ifficulty. Because replacement of the Plymouth Avenue Bridge t anticipated on a timely basis, a weight restriction was placed on the ridge for a period of time, thereby creating traffic and public safety concerns. These restrictions were in effect until the City of Minneapolis reconstructed the bridge. In 2007, the City of Golden Valley attempted to work with the MPRB regarding the traffic operations at Theodore Wirth Parkway and Glenwood Avenue. Golden Valley proposed to make improvements that would address the issues. However, Golden Valley was not permitted to implement the improvements, even after each G:\Mpls Park Board\Charter Commission Discussion.docx respective agency's staff seemed to have reached consensus on the course of action needed to improve the intersection. Another infrastructure issue affects water quality. While the City of Minneapolis is a member of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, the MPRB is not. Bassett Creek, Sweeney Lake and Wirth Lake are all on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Impaired Waters list. Furthermore, the water quality of Twin Lake ecently shown signs of degradation. While the MPRB appears to b ested in undertaking a portion of the best management practices ' to protect these water bodies, there does not seem to be a cone 0 undertake what is necessary to address water quality iss oordinated effort has .impacted the ability to obtain St ~ality projects. C: RT Ryback, ayor, City of Minneapolis Don Samuels, City of Minneapolis City Council Member, Ward 5 Golden Valley City Council G:\Mpls Park Board\Charter Commission Discussion.docx alley Mem randum Public Works 763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting June 9, 2009 Agenda Item 9. Proposed 2010 Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) Budget Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Summary Mayor Loomis has requested that the proposed 2010 BCWMC budget be discussed at the Council/Manager meeting. Attachments Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission 2010 Budget and Levy, dated May 2009 (9 pages) Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission www.bassettcreekwmo.org . Crystal . Golden Valley . Medicine Lake . Minneapolis · M1nnetonka . New Hope · Plymouth · Robbinsdale · St. Louis Park June 1, 2009 Ms. Sue Virnig City Clerk City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Dear Ms. Virnig: Pursuant to Article VIII, Subd. 5 ofthe Joint and Cooperative Agreement which establishes the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, the proposed budget for 2010 is hereby submitted to the municipality. Also included as part of the proposed budget is the proposed 2010 assessment as called for in Article VIII, Subd. 3, regarding the City's contribution to the Commission's general fund. The Joint and Cooperative Agreement provides that each municipality has until August 1 to object to items in the budget or to otherwise offer comments on items contained therein. Comments should be directed to Mr. Michael Welch, Chair, Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, c/o Barr Engineering Company, 4700 West 77th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803. Sincerely, CJrwru,~~ . Amy Herbert, Recording Administrator, Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Enclosures c: Mayor Linda Loomis Mr. Charlie LeFevere 248883 Michael Wekh, BCWMCChair do Barr Engineering COInJHIny 4700 West 71h Street Mbmeapolis, MN 55435 612-385-6885 Charlie LeFevere, Attorney Kennedy & Graven 470 US Bank PlaZll, 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-337-9215 612-337-9310 (fox) Leonard Kremer, Engineer Barr Engb'eering Company 4700 West 71h Street Mim,eapolis, MN 55435 952-832-2600 952-832-2601 (fax) Bassett Creek Water Management Commission 2010 Budget and Levy May 2009 The Joint and Cooperative Agreement establishing the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission (BCWMC) sets forth the procedure required to adopt the annual budget. Article VIII, Subdivision 3, provides that each member agrees to contribute each year to a general fund to be used for administrative purposes and certain operating expenses. Half of the annual contribution of each member is based on assessed valuation of property within the watershed and the other half on the ratio of area of each member within the watershed to the total area of the Bassett Creek watershed. Subdivision 5 of Article VIII further provides: "On or hefore July 1 of each year, the Board shall adopt a detailed budget for the ensuing year and decide upon the total amount necessary for the general fund." Budget approval requires a two-thirds vote (six Commissioners). Further, the Secretary "shall certify the budget on or before July I to the clerk of each member governmental unit, together with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each member." Each of the nine members then has until August 1 to file an objection to the budget. The 2010 budget was prepared by a Budget Committee consisting of Commissioner Michael Welch (BCWMC Chair), Commissioner Ginny Black (BCWMC Vice Chair), Commissioner Linda Loomis (Commission Treasurer), and Commissioner Pauline Langsdorf (Commission Secretary). The BCWMC's "Second Generation" Watershed Management Plan was approved by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources on August 25,2004, and adopted by the BCWMC on September 16, 2004. That plan includes a capital projects budget, which is funded by ad valorem taxes and has been amended to include channel restoration projects. Commission activities have focused on implementation of the Watershed Management Plan. The proposed 2010 budget of $463,000 was adopted by nine commissioners voting in favor of the budget at the BCWMC meeting on May 21,2009. The proposed 2010 budget is enclosed. Specific items in the budget are discussed below. 1. Engineering services are budgeted at $256,000 in 2010. Many of the individual items have remained the same from the 2009 budget. The following paragraphs summarize each of the Engineering budget items. . Technical Services-this item covers the day-to-day technical operations, such as preparing for the Commission and T AC meetings, performing preliminary site reviews and correspondence, and communications with the Commissioners, watershed communities, developers, agencies, and other entities. The proposed 2010 budget is $110,000, which is the same as the 2009 budget. . Plat Reviews-at its December 15, 2005, meeting, the BCWMC instated a permit fee effective January 1, 2006, and revised as of January 1,2009, to cover the expense of reviewing development plans and improvement projects. The proposed 2010 budget for plat reviews is $60,000, which are largely funded by permit fees. These expected permit fees are shown in the 2010 budget under "2010 Assessments and Fees;" it is estimated that the BCWMC will receive $44,780 in permit fees in 2010. . Co1J1II1ission and T AC Meetings- this item covers the cost for the engineer to attend 12 monthly Commission meetings and six bimonthly T AC meetings. The proposed budget for 2010 is $13,000, the same as 2009, but more than the $9,506 spent in 2008. Previously, this budget item was called Commission Meetings and not all TAC meeting were charged to this 2010 Budget and Levy. May 2009 1 item (including 2008). The increase from 2008 spent to 2009 budgeted reflects the engineer's attendance at all Commission and T AC meetings. . Surveys and Studies-the proposed budget for 2010 is $20,000. The intent of this budget item is to cover the costs of conducting special studies, and addressing unanticipated issues, questions, etc. that can arise during the year. Water Quality/Monitoring-for 2010, this budget item includes detailed lake monitoring of Medicine Lake, as part of the four-year monitoring cycle. Three Rivers Park District and the City of Plymouth typically perform annual monitoring of Medicine Lake at one location. The BCWMC detailed monitoring program includes monitoring two locations on Medicine Lake on six to twelve occasions for selected parameters. Three Rivers Park District will collect and analyze the total phosphorus, soluble reactive phosphorus, total nitrogen, pH and chlorophyll a samples. Three Rivers Park District will collect the phytoplankton and zooplankton samples, and Barr will analyze the samples. Barr will perform an aquatic survey on two occasions and will prepare the final report. . Water Quantity-this item covers the work associated with the BCWMC's lake and stream gauging program. The proposed budget for 2010 is $11,000 (the same as 2009). The readings have proved valuable to the communities for planning future development and as documentation of the response of surface water bodies to above normal and below normal precipitation. The 2010 lake gauging program will consist of measuring water levels on Medicine Lake, Sweeney Lake, Parkers Lake, Westwood Lake, Crane Lake (Ridgedale Pond), Northwood Lake, Bassett Creek Park Pond and Wirth Park storage area. Two readings per month will be taken during the period April 1 , 2010 through September 30, 2010. One reading per month will be taken during the other months of the year. The 2010 stream gauging program will consist of periodically reading stages or gauging the stream at the new tunnel entrance, at the Theodore Wirth ParklT.H. 55 outlet structure, at Highway 100 (main stem), at Wisconsin Avenue, at Sweeney Lake, at Medicine Lake, at Winnetka Avenue (north branch), at 26th Avenue (plymouth Creek fish barrier), and at other selected locations if periods of high flow occur. The program also includes periodic surveys of benchmarks to ensure consistency with past readings. . Inspections-there are two separate budget items under this task: o Watershed Inspections-this item covers the BCWMC's construction site erosion control inspection program. The proposed budget for 2010 is $8,000; permit fees offset a portion of the watershed inspection cost. The inspections have been valuable for correcting erosion and sediment control practices which are not in conformance with BCWMC policies. The inspections also verify that sites are developed in accordance with approved plans. The program consists of inspecting active construction sites in the watershed once every month. Erosion control inspections will begin April 2010 and extend through October 2010. Selected sites may be inspected on two-week intervals to verify that requested erosion control modifications have been completed. Critical work such as . wetland or creek crossings and work adjacent to lakes and sensitive wetlands will be inspected as necessary. BCWMC staffwill continue to coordinate the inspections with respective contacts from each city. Following each inspection, a letter listing construction projects and the improvement needed for effective erosion control will be sent to the inspection department at each city where improvements are required. 20 I 0 Budget and Levy - May 2009 2 o Project Inspections--this item covers the BCWMC's annual inspection of the flood control project system. The proposed budget for 2010 is $10,000. The inspection program covers the flood control project features completed by the Commission between 1974 and 1996. The objective of the inspection program is to find and address erosion, settlement, sedimentation, and structural issues. In accordance with the Bassett Creek Flood Control Project Operation and Maintenance Manual (except as noted), the following project features require annual inspection: Minneapolis: · Conduit (Double Box Culvert) - inspect double box culvert every five years (2004,2009,2014,2019...) · Deep Tunnel - dewater and inspect tunnel every 20 years. This inspection was performed during 2008; the next inspection will be 2028 · Old Tunnel (gQ! included in BCWMC inspection program) · Open Channel Golden Vallev · Highway 55 Control Structure & Ponding Area · Golden Valley Country Club Embankment (Box Culvert, Overflow Weir, and downstream channel) · Noble Avenue Crossing · Regent Avenue Crossing · Westbrook Road Crossing · Wisconsin Avenue Crossing · Minnaqua Drive Bridge Removal Crystal . Box Culvert and Channel Improvements (Markwood Area) Edgewood Embankment with Ponding Highway 100/Bassett Creek Park Pond 32nd Avenue Crossing Brunswick A venue Crossing 34th Avenue Crossing Douglas Drive Crossing Georgia Avenue Crossing 36th-Hampshire Avenue Crossing Channel Improvements . . . . . . . . . Plvmoutb · Medicine Lake Outlet Structure · Plymouth Fish Barrier 2010 Budget and Levy - May 2009 3 · Municipal Plan Review-this item covers the cost to review the member cities local water management plans for conformance with the BCWMC Watershed Management Plan. The proposed budget for 2010 is $4,000, which will cover the costs for reviewing up to two local plans. 2. Administrator-this was a new budget item in 2008. The Administrator services budget was reduced in 2010 to $15,000 from $35,000 in 2009. In 2008 the BCWMC underwent an operations analysis conducted by an independent firm. The results of the analysis are guiding the BCWMC's direction for addressing its administrator needs. The Administrator services budget reduction reflects the BCWMC's recognition oftight city budgets, the likely inefficiencies that would be realized early in the process of adding a new administrator, and the BCWMC's determination to use a variety of contract providers (including current consultants) and board members to provide critical assistance in priority target areas identified by the 2008 analysis. 3. Legal-this item covers basic legal services, which are budgeted at $18,500 for 2010. 4. Financial Management-this item covers services provided by the Deputy Treasurer at the City of Golden Valley, which are budgeted for $3,000 in 2010. 5. Liability Insurance, Auditing and Bonding-this item is budgeted at $15,000 for 2010, reflecting an increase in auditing services directed by expanded auditing regulations. 6. Administrative Services-this item covers administrative and secretarial services, including mailing and copying, which are budgeted at $45,000 for 2010. 7. Public Relations & Outreach-there are three separate budget items under this task: · Publications/Annual Report-$4,000 is budgeted in 2010 for preparing the BCWMC's 2009 annual report . Website-$4,500 is budgeted in 2010 for maintaining, updating, and making improvements to the BCWMC website . WOMP-$10,OOO is budgeted for 2010, which covers the BCWMC's costs related to the Watershed Outlet Monitoring Program (WOMP) station on Bassett Creek. The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board has been running the WOMP station for the last several years in a cooperative effort with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. The MPRB handles the sample and data collection tasks, MCES performs maintenance, and Barr provides assistance with the rating curve. The 2010 budget includes $5,000 for MPRB to operate the WOMP station. 8. Demonstration/Education Grants- this item is the BCWMC grant program, which is managed by the Education Committee; the budget for 2010 is $5,000. 9. Watershed Education Partnerships-this was a new budget item in 2009 and includes participation in the Metropolitan Council's Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP), the Hennepin Conservation District River Watch Program, Metro WaterShed Partners, the Blue Thumb program, and the Metro Blooms Rain Garden program. The budget for 2010 is $15,000. 10. Education and Public Outreach-the 2010 budget for this item is $4,000, which includes anticipated expenses for brochures, fact sheets, native seed packets, and the Joint Education and Public Outreach Committee administrative costs. 11. PublicCommunications--the 2010 budget for this item is $3,000 and covers costs related to the publication of hearing and special meeting notices in newspapers and journals and the publication and distribution of other required communications that may be necessary and would be separate from the Web site or education and public outreach communications. 2010 Budget and Levy - May 2009 4 12. Erosion/Sediment (Channel Maintenance)-these ftmds are for creek and stream bank erosion repair and sediment removal projects that are not ftmded as a channel restoration project through the BCWMC's Capital Improvement Program. The amount budgeted for collection in 2010 is $25,000. The money collected goes into the BCWMC's Creek and Streambank Trunk System Maintenance, Repair and Sediment Removal Fund (the Channel Maintenance Fund). There is currently $172,000 in the Channel Maintenance Fund; to-date about $3,000 of the ftmd has been used on channel maintenance projects. The BCWMC Watershed Management Plan (Section 7.2.2) calls for the BCWMC to use the Creek and Streambank Trunk System Maintenance, Repair and Sediment Removal Fund to finance the: . Maintenance and repairs needed to restore a creek or streambank area to the designed flow rate. . Work needed to restore a creek or stream bank area that has either resulted in damage to a structure, or where structural damage is imminent, based on an assessment of benefits. . Portion of a project that provides BCWMC benefits, including reduced potential for flooding, mitigation of water quality impairment, or minimizing the potential for water quality impairment. . BCWMC's share of maintenance projects to be applied for by the cities that have a regional benefit, or to partially ftmd smaller, localized projects that cities wish to undertake. 13. Long-Term Maintenance (Flood Control Project)-these ftmds are for projects to repair and maintain structures associated with the BCWMC Flood Control Project. The BCWMC Plan calls for annual assessments of $25,000 to the fund, and for the ftmd balance to be maintained at (but not exceed) $1 million. The current fund balance is about $750,000. The proposed 2010 budget! assessment is $25,000. 14. TMDL Studies-this item was added to the 2005 budget ($35,000) in anticipation of the state mandate to prepare Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies on impaired waters within the watershed. This budget item includes ftmding for BCWMC participation in TMDL studies not otherwise funded through other sources and also includes BCWMC preparation for future TMDL studies that likely will be necessary. The TMDL Studies ftmd is currently at $58,000 and another $10,000 will be added to the fund in 2009. The 2010 budget amount for TMDL studies is $10,000. TMDL studies for Medicine Lake, Sweeney Lake, and Wirth Lake are underway. Northwood Lake and Bassett Creek in the watershed are also listed as impaired waters (parkers Lake is also listed as impaired for mercury). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is encouraging watershed districts and organizations to address multiple impairments within their jurisdictions where possible. The BCWMC is determining the feasibility of a watershed-wide TMDL for 2010 to address multiple impairments of Bassett Creek. Additional data may need to be collected from Bassett Creek in 2010 in support of TMDL activities; these could include E. coli and streamflow data. 15. Proposed 2010 Capital Projects-For 2010, the cost of the Plymouth Creek channel restoration project (PC-I) is estimated to be $965,200 and the cost of the Bassett Creek Main Stem channel restoration project (Highway 100 to Regent Ave) is estimated to be $780,000. The total estimated cost of the projects expected to start in 2010 is $1,745,200. For the projects expected to start in 2010, iUs proposed that $1,000,000 be assessed for 2010 and $745, 200 be assessed in 2011. Note that other proj ects are proposed to start in 2011; the costs (or partial costs) of those projects would be in addition to the suggested $745,200 assessment. 20 I 0 Budget and Levy - May 2009 5 At its May 21,2009 meeting, the BCWMC Commissioners also considered the assessment on the cities. The 2010 assessment was adopted by nine commissioners voting in favor to levy $414,150 for the 2010 fiscal year, as compared with the $449,875 for 2009 adopted in 2008, based on the following: Funding Needs: 2010 Administrative Budget .... ............. .............. .................... ........... .................... ............. $463,000 Funding Source: 2010 Assessment .......... ...................... .......... ......... ......... ........ ...... ............ ...... ........ ............. $414,150 2010 Estimated Permit Review Fees..................................................................................... $44,780 Assessment for 2010 Capital Projects (Hennepin County) ..............................................$1 ,000,000 The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission's 2010 Operating Budget and 2010 Assessment per community are enclosed. Enclosures: 2010 Operating Budget 2010 Assessment 2010 Budget and Levy - May 2009 6 G IHI A I ElF r-J- Proposed 2010 Operating Budget -2. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission - May 21, 2009 3 $159,570 $10.000 110,000 $394,339 For Information (AdminIstrative Account)- i-: Financial Information ~ Audited fiscal year 2008 fund balance at January 31, 2009 Expected income from assessments in 2009 hi Expected interest income in 2009 t":2 Expected income from project review fees t...:. Estimated funds available for fiscal year 2009 ~ Estimated expenditures for fiscal year 2009 m Estimated fund balance as of January 31, 2010 t4 2010 Budget Iti Proposed 2010 Capital Projects t::!; Proposed 2010 Operating Budget I'" proposed total 2010 I:ludget 2010 Assessments and Fees 2010 Operating Budget Estimated 2010 permit fees (81% of permit expenditures) Assessment proposed for 2010 Operating Budget Proposed Budget Reserve on January 31,2010 (1) Will be. transferred to Channel Maintenance Fund ~ (2) Will be transferred to Long-Term Maintenance Fund ~ (3) Will be transferred to a TMDL Studies Fund )- (4) Grant program for demonstrations and education I ~~ (5) Includes brochures, fact sheets, miscellaneous education products, etc. ~ (6) Review two cities municipal comp plan. 63 (7) Blue Thumb ($1,500); CAMP {$4,500);MetroBlooms ($2,OOO); RiverWatch ($2,OOO); Watershed Partners ($5,000) 4 5 ENGINEERING t:I Technical Services 7 Plat Reviews (funded by permit fees) 2008-$42,900 8 Commission and T AC Meetings 9 Si;u:vevs and Studies 10 WaThr Quality / Monitoring 11 Water Quantity 12 Inspections 13 Watershed Inspections 14 Project Inspections 1 b Municipal Plan ReView 1 t:I Subtotal Engineering 17 Administrator 1 B Legal 19 Financial Management 20 Audit, Insurance & Bond 21 Meeting Catering Expenses 22 Administrative Services 3 Public Outreach :4 Publications/ AnnuaJReport Website 6 WOMP Demonstration/Education Grants Watershed Education Partnerships Education and Public Outreach Public Communications Erosion/Sediment (Channel Maintenance) Long-Term Maint. (Flood Control Project) Item . 28 29 30 31 32 ~~ ~4 ubtotal ~b 'MOL StUdies ~t:I ubtotal TMDL Studies 37 GRAND TOTAL Unaudited 2008 Actual 2009 Budget 2009 Estimated 90,187 56,687 9,506 2.250 19.921 7.117 110.000 55,000 13,000 20,000 49,000 11,000 110.000 55,000 13.000 20.000 49,000 11.000 6.378 20,387 12,336 $224,769 8.170 14,428 3,000 14,149 4,219 43,084 8,000 10,000 6,000 $282,000 35,000 18,500 3,000 13,000 5,100 45.000 8.000 10,000 6,000 $282,000 35,000 18.500 3.000 13,000 5,100 45.000 2,473 4,503 1,685 11,634 o 2,157 68 25,000 (1) 25.000 (2) 4,000 1,575 10,000 5,000 11,500 8,200 3,000 25,000 (1) 25,000 (2) 4,000 1,575 10,000 5,000 (4 13,200 8,200 (5 3,000 25,000 en 25.000 (2) (3) ~212,875 ~10,OOO (3 $10,000 $504,875 $214,575 10,000(3) 10,00lr ... $506,575 301,615 ..................................................................................---------449~8j5-. ..................................................................................----------'1~6'l515-. ..................................................................................----------44~11il5-. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~-------~~~]i~-' ..................................................................................---------2'911;6'gg.' .....................................................................................----------------. ...............................-.................................................. ................................................................................... 1,000,000 ...................................................................................--------.iiE;47!rl5o-' .................................................................................. ',404,bUU 463,000 --------------------...................-..............----------411~g-5ef' --------------------..................................... 414,150 --------------------_........;..............................--------------.. ................................................................................n. I J K IL Proposed 2010 Budget 110,000 60,000 13,000 20,000 20,000 11.000 8,000 10,000 4,000 (t)) $256,000 15,000 18,500 3,000 15,000 5,000 45,000 4,000 4,500 10,000 5,000 4 15,000 (7 4,000 (5 3.000 25,000 (1) 25,000 (2) $ 97,000 10,000 (3) 10,000 $463,000 Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Proposed 2009 Assessment June 2009 5 2 7 Community For Taxes Payable In 2009 Percent Current Area Percent Average 12008 Assessmen 2009 Assessmen Proposed 2010 2009 Watershed Assessment Net Tax Capacity . of Valuation In Acres of Area Percent $455.501 $449.874 $414.150 4 Crystal $8,240.630 5.60 1,264 5.09 5.34 $23,176 $24,067 $22,131 8 Golden Vallev $34,195.815 23.24 6.615 26.63 24.93 $121,287 $112,052 $103,256 9 Medicine Lake $1,017.060 0.69 199 0.80 0.75 $3.649 $3,298 $3.090 1 Minneapolis $11,462,538 7.79 1,690 6.80 7.30 $30.986 $33,246 $30,216 4 Minnetonka $8.722,988 5.93 1,108 4.46 5.19 $20.315 $23,031 $21,510 Ii' New Hope $8,648,145 5.88 1,252 5.04 5.46 $22.956 $24,445 $22,605 :> Plymouth $65,106,644 44.24 11,618 46.77 45.50 $213,018 $205,093 $188,453 4 Robbinsdale $3,227,666 2.19 345 1.39 1.79 $6,326 $8,077 $7,417 6 St Louis Park $6,540,867 4.44 752 3.03 3.74 $13,788 $16,565 $15,472 TOTAL $147.162.353 100.00 24.843 100.00 100.00 $455,500 $449,875 $414,150 3 8 4 4 4' -8.04% -7.85% -6.31% -9.11% -6.60% -7.53% -8.11 % -8.17% -6.60% -7.94%