The URL can be used to link to this page

04-07-10 JWC Agenda AGENDA JOINT WATER COMMISSION 1 :30 pm - April 7, 2010 Council Conference Room Golden Valley City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes - January 13, 2010 3. Receive and file minutes from the Water Advisory Board 4. Clearwire to locate their Equipment for Wireless Services on the New Hope Water Tower - McDonald 5. Grouting and Sealing Vault at Reservoir - Lemke 6. Air conditioning unit for pump house.- Lemke 7. Reconstruction of CSAH 9 (Lake Drive) between Lakeview and Victory Memorial Parkway, Robbinsdale (scheduled 2013-2014) - TAC 8. Adjournment JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES Golden Valley ~ Crystal - New Hope Meeting of January 13,2010 The Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Joint Water Commission meeting was called to order at 1 :30 pm, in the City of Golden Valley Council Conference Room. Commissioners Present Tom Burt, City Manager, Golden Valley Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope Minutes of December 2 carried unanimously to approve the Staff Present Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager, G Dave Lemke, Utilities Maintenance Supervisor, G~ Paul Coone, Operations Manager, New Hope Bernie Weber, Utilities Maintenance Supervis0ti)~ew Hope Guy Johnson, Director of Public Works, New Hope Tom Mathisen, Director of Public Works, Crystal Other Scott Harder, Environmental Financia MOVED by McDonal minutes of the De ositories for Joint Water Funds ced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ESOLUTION 10-01 DEPOSITORIES FOR JOINT WATER FUNDS The motion the foregoing resolution was seconded by Commissioner Norris and up taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Burt, McDonald, and he following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was decl uly passed and adopted, signed by the Chair and his signature attested by the Vice Chair. Barr Engineering Joint Water Commission Emergency Water Supply Technical Memorandum Update Further updates will be presented to the JWC board after the Technical Memorandum is discussed at the upcoming Technical Advisory Commission meeting. TAC will create a scope on phasing in on the next step, which might include cost estimates and possible well sites. Joint Water Commission Page 2 of 2 Letter to the City of Minneapolis Harder has drafted a letter to the City of Minneapolis regarding costs related to services, Harder will forward the letter to the JWC Commissioners so they can review the letter before deciding on how to proceed. Contract for Services for Environmental Financial Group, Inc Harder submitted a proposal for services based on an hourly basi hich would not exceed $35,000. Invoices would be submitted monthly for services re ardi various issues to include backup City water supply, expanded JWC oversight . governance, emergency interconnections with neighboring cities, and supplemental rrdwater supply. Proposal is being taken under consideration by the Contract for 2009 Audit Services MOVED by McDonald, seconded by Norris to Certified Public Accountants for an amount not to Services for the Joint Water Commis . n. contract with R 25.00 for 2009 Audit Cleanwire Communications Clear Wireless LLC aka CI water tower. New Hope layout was reviewed '''';, ....'0' " :', ~: ire met with. New bout a possible location on their oncerns.about the lac of space for the equipment. The ies. arried unanimously to deny the request ire less Services on the New Hope orth, New Hope, Minnesota. Thomas D. Burt, Chair ATTEST: Christine Columbus, Administrative Assistant Minneapolis Water Advisory Board Meeting Minutes April 28, 2009 - 4:30 pm - 6:30 pm In Attendance Sandra Colvin Roy, Council Member, City of Minneapolis Linda Loomis, Mayor, City of Golden Valley Tom Burt, City Manager, City of Golden Valley Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works, City of Golden Valley Anne Norris, City Manager, City of Crystal Tom Mathisen, Director of Public Works, City of Crystal Jesse Struve, City of Edina Kathy Young, Assistant City Engineer, City of Columbia Heights Chris Catlin, Superintendent of Water Plant Operations, Minneapolis Water Works Rob Verke, Water Engineering Manager, Minneapolis Water Works Brette Hjelle, Interagency Coordinator, City of Minneapolis Allen Dye, Metropolitan Airports Commission Ruth Nelson, City Clerk, City of Hilltop Kathi Hemken, City of New Hope Bob Cockriel, Utilities Superintendent, City of Bloomington Kirk McDonald, City Manager, City of New Hope ReNae Bowman, Mayor, City of Crystal Chris Elvrum, Metropolitan Council Trudy Richter, Richardson, Richter & Associates, Inc. David Wellington, Richardson, Richter & Associates, Inc. Scott Harder, Environmental Financial Group, Inc. The meeting convened at 4:30 pm. Introductions Sandra Colvin Roy welcomed and thanked everyone for attending today's meeting. Over the last couple of years, Minneapolis, Golden Valley and others have been discussing water and the need to provide a sustainable regional drinking water supply. Today's meeting will focus on the background of the cities' regional water supply. Water Advisory Board (WAB) Scott Harder provided a brief overview of the WAB as currently proposed. Backqround The focus of the WAB is drinking water. Two documents attached to the agenda (Drinking Water Advisory Board Bylaws (draft concept) and A Vision for a Sustainable Regional Water Supply) were developed and endorsed by the Joint Water Task Force. The Joint Water Commission cities (New Hope, Crystal, and Golden Valley) also endorsed these documents through separate Council actions. G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting One Minutes.doc In 2004, the JWC negotiated a new water purchase agreement with the City of Minneapolis. In the course of negotiations, a number of issues were identified including: the cost of water, lack of a backup water supply, expanded governance to include cities served by Minneapolis, and overall stewardship of the Mississippi River. The Joint Water Task Force viewed the WAS as a way of receiving input as well as communicating with customers regarding investments made in the Minneapolis water supply. The WAS is proposed to meet about four times a year, including two meetings to review the Minneapolis capital budget and two meetings to review legislative, source protection, and other issues. Mayor Loomis stated WAS participants purchase water in whole or part from Minneapolis and share an interest in the Mississippi River. This group will collectively be more effective in accomplishing goals to guard the water supply than working independently. Powers and Functions The idea behind creating a Drinking Water Advisory Board (VVAB) was to facilitate communication and make recommendations to the Minneapolis Water Works (MWW) concerning matters relating to the MWW. Colvin Roy envisions the WAB to function much like the CLlC (Capital Long-Range Improvement Committee) does to the Minneapolis Mayor. CLlC is a citizen advisory committee that reviews all of the City of Minneapolis capital projects and, from a citizen's perspective, ranks the projects and make recommendations to Mayor Rybak prior to his presentation to the City Council. The WAB would review the Minneapolis Capital Projects Plan and provide input to the MWW from a regional standpoint. Governance The WAB is proposed to provide advisory oversight, review and meaningful input into matters pertaining to the cost of water provided at wholesale by the MWW. These matters include capital investment, operations, conservation, drought management, source protection, and regulatory and legislative matters. The Task at Hand The WAS is proposed to serve in an advocacy role and provide recommendations regarding conservation and improvements to the joint water systems. The immediate task is to review and comment on the Minneapolis 2010-2014 Capital Projects Plan. Mayor Rybak would like recommendations from this group before making his presentation to the City Council in August. Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan Chris Elvrum, water supply manager for the Metropolitan Council, presented the Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (MAWSP). The guiding principle of the MAWSP is to make sure there is a sustainable water supply for current and future G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting One Minutes.doc 2 generations. Development of the MAWSP was advised by a committee of Governor appointees, including Mayor Loomis. One of the Council's interim recommendations to the Legislature was to fund a pipeline interconnection between St. Paul and Minneapolis. The MAWSP focuses on both groundwater and surface water. Outcomes of the MAWSP process include clarifying water supply planning regulatory roles, endorsing the use of a conservation toolkit, and development of a regional groundwater model to better identify potential conflicts in groundwater use. Mr. Elvrum mentioned that a separate effort is underway to develop and implement a drought response plan to address when it is appropriate to release the Mississippi River headwaters reservoir and support source water protection. The MAWSP provides guidance to the local suppliers and supports cooperative efforts for communities in the area of digging wells. The Department of Natural Resources is being more proactive in granting communities permission to drill new wells by letting the communities know earlier in the process what requirements are necessary prior to DNR approval. A groundwater model was developed that identified areas showing a significant decline in aquifer, impacts on surface water (i.e., groundwater withdrawal, wetlands, lakes, etc.), and groundwater quality issues. The model can indirectly help predict what climate change can do to the water supply. Surface water issues identified include source water protection (TMDL process), looking at past low flows in the Mississippi River, measuring base flows in the Mississippi River, and looking to surface water suppliers and groups such as the WAS to help assess surface water supplies. The plan was provisionally approved and the Met Council is now looking at streamlining the DNR requirements for communities, other sources, conservation expectations, and threshold criteria. The master plan concluded there is enough water from the Mississippi River to provide a sustainable water supply and that water can be pumped to areas where the traditional sources become inadequate. The plan did not address a cost assessment of groundwater vs. surface water suppliers. Surface water plans are based on development within a community. The water in Minneapolis and S1. Paul is lower in cost compared to other suppliers. Introduction to Minneapolis Water Works 2010-2014 Capital Plan Rob Yerke presented an overview of the Minneapolis Water Works facilities and water projects in the 2010-2014 Capital Plan. Attached is a list of the five main projects Minneapolis is proposing in order of priority. Minneapolis is proposing to prepare a Master Plan to assess the needs and prioritize the improvements needed for the entire utility system. G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting One Minutes.doc 3 Other Issues and Discussion Items MWW works closely with Minneapolis Finance Department staff to develop a pro forma operating expense projection to determine the rates needed to sustain the operation. Action Item: The WAB requested that they be provided copies of the pro forma to help them understand the capital budget requests. The MWW pro forma will be included in the next meeting agenda's packet. Next Meeting: Review and Comment on 2010~2014 Capital Plan Colvin Roy asked the participants to review the MWW capital projects and budget requests, and consider what other projects can be included in the capital projects list for discussion at the next meeting. Next Meeting Date and Time The next meeting will be held at the Columbia Heights Filtration Plant from 4:30 pm to 6:30 pm. A final date will be determined and communicated to the group well in advance. MWW will conduct a tour of the plant. Final details will be sent via email. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:30 pm. Respectfully submitted: is(~o/ Administrative Assistant, City of Golden Valley G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting One Minutes.doc 4 Minneapolis Water Advisory Board Meeting Minutes June 25,2009 - 4:00 pm - 6:30 pm An informal tour of the Columbia Heights water treatment facility was conducted at 3 pm with Shahin Rezania guiding the tour. In Attendance Sandra Colvin Roy, Council Member and Co-Chair, City of Minneapolis Linda Loomis, Mayor and Co-Chair, City of Golden Valley Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works, City of Golden Valley Steve Kotke, Director of Public Works, City of Minneapolis Shahin Rezania, Director of Water Treatment and District, Minneapolis Water Works Chris Catlin, Superintendent of Water Plant Operations, Minneapolis Water Works Rob Verke, Water Engineering Manager, Minneapolis Water Works Brette Hjelle, Interagency Coordinator, City of Minneapolis Anne Norris, City Manager, City of Crystal Tom Mathisen, Director of Public Works, City of Crystal Kevin Hansen, City Engineer, City of Columbia Heights Bob Cockriel, Utilities Superintendent, City of Bloomington Wayne Houle, Director Of Public Works, City of Edina Ruth Nelson, City Clerk, City of Hilltop Kathi Hemken, Mayor, City of New Hope Kirk McDonald, City Manager, City of New Hope Robert Nelson, Commissioner, Metropolitan Airports Commission Allen Dye, Project Manager, Metropolitan Airports Commission Laurel Reeves, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Walt Fehst, City Manager, City of Columbia Heights Trudy Richter, Richardson, Richter & Associates, Inc. David Wellington, Richardson, Richter & Associates, Inc. Scott Harder, Environmental Financial Group, Inc. Greg Stonehouse, HDR Engineering, Inc. Co-Chair Loomis called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm. Approval of Minutes MOVED by Ruth Nelson, seconded by Kirk McDonald and motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the April 28, 2009 meeting as submitted. Revised Three-Meeting Plan Initially, Scott Harder proposed two meetings to review the Minneapolis Capital Improvements Plan (CIP); however, after further discussion with Steve Kotke and Shahin Rezania, it was determined that at least three meetings would be necessary for the Water Advisory Board (WAS) to consider the plan and agree on what recommendations to make to Minneapolis Mayor Rybak. The objective for this meeting is to gather background information starting with staff recommendations and priorities G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting Two Minutes.doc and then create a draft recommendations report to be sent out to the WAS prior to the July meeting. Steve Kotke described the Minneapolis budget process and the timeline for submitting recommendations to the Mayor. The WAS recommendations should be submitted to Mayor Rybak at the same time the Capital Long-Range Improvement Committee (CLlC) submits their CIP recommendations, which is in July. The mayor gives the recommended budget to the City Council (both capital and operating) by mid-August and the Council usually adopts the budget in December. The process this year is somewhat different due to local government aid cuts. The program will be accelerated and a preliminary budget will be submitted in October. Conservation Rates Laurel Reeves, DNR, attended today's meeting to discuss compliance with the State statutes regarding conservation rates for public suppliers. In 2008, the State legislature amended the statute requiring suppliers who serve more than 1,000 people to adopt a rate structure that would encourage conservation. The conservation rate structure needs to be in place by January 2010. The Joint Water Commission's (JWC) Water Supply Plan does include a plan for water conservation. At this point, the DNR will not be enforcing the conservation rate, but asking communities to show a conservation rate plan and be accountable and responsible for implementing those plans. Communities will also submit a permit to the DNR that will include information regarding the community's conservation rate. Conservation plans that show one flat rate would not be considered a conservation rate. The spirit of the statute change was to encourage water conservation. The DNR perspective is that surface and groundwater are inseparable. There are about 1,200 water facilities in Minnesota. Minneapolis has looked at other states and some cities depend on surface water. The water supplied by Minneapolis comes from the Mississippi River and the water usage has not reduced the flow of the Mississippi River. Staff questioned why the same conservation requirements are necessary for surface water facilities. Specific guidelines for industry users are not currently in place and the DNR recommends communities require both industry and residential to have a conservation rate defined. Some government officials want to make sure there is a lifeline rate included for low or fixed income residents. One of the issues Minneapolis has is going back in history to the connections that use only one meter. The city requires only one meter for single and multi-family homes. The statute does not require individual water meters for each residential unit within a multiple-family dwelling, but the conservation rate must reflect the number of units within the multi-dwelling home. A similar issue exists with mobile home parks. G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting Two Minutes.doc 2 Minneapolis is investigating winter/summer rates. If Minneapolis decides to go to a winter/summer rate and one rate for wholesale customers, what would the DNR think about that method? The JWC has a contract with Minneapolis with a peak amount of usage allowed, which is essentially a summer and winter rate. Mayor Loomis asked if the DNR would view this as a conservation rate. Because the JWC makes conservation decisions, it would be beneficial to discuss the conservation issue with the DNR. Reeves directed members to send conservation rate questions or inquiries to the regional hydrologist or Dale Homuth, Central Region Director. MWW Asset Management Shahin Rezania gave an overview of the sustainability of the Minneapolis Water Works (MWW). Maximus software was implemented that produces data to help maintain Minneapolis' approximate $1 billion in assets. Every year, staff reviews projects that are removed, added, or moved up in priority on the CIP list taking into account redundancy issues, equipment that has failed, return on investment, etc. Due to the complexity of the overall system, the difficulty is understanding and weighing projects, and balancing the needs. The proposed Master Plan will help address issues and apply the same standard and condition assessment to the entire system and compare projects on an equal basis. MWW Historical.lnformation David Wellington provided a brief overview of historical information and a matrix of MWW actual appropriation costs from 1999 to 2008. Years showing zero costs are due to costs carried over from previous years or the project is completed. Building the Columbia Heights plant started in 1999 and was completed in 2005. Minneapolis City Council approved $142 million. About $70 million was spent on the Columbia Heights plant and some money was used on the chemical building and the design of the Fridley filtration plant. Construction of the Fridley ultrafiltration plant was halted about 30 percentthrough the design process due to cost issues. Minneapolis also determined that the level of treatment achieved for the water from the Mississippi River was sufficient and that the Fridley plant could function for another 20 years with ongoing maintenance. Clancy recommended the WAB continue to encourage Minneapolis to improve the treatment process to address the taste and odor issue. [An American Water Works Association video called "We Treat Water Right: The Basics of Water Quality" was shown during the break.] G:\JWC\WAB\M1NUTES\WAB Meeting Two Minutes.doc 3 Consideration of MWW 2010w2014 Capital Improvement Plan Scott Harder briefly stated the expectations for the group from this segment of the meeting. The group will look at the Minneapolis staff priorities and discuss whether they are in agreement with those priorities or identify priorities that should be reset. A document will be drafted that includes the group's comments, issues identified, and future recommendations and submitted to WAB members to review prior to the July meeting. One of the purposes for a list of prioritized projects is that in order to receive consideration for State funding, a project needs to be shown on a capital improvements plan. The following is a discussion of the MWW 2010 CIP projects presented in order of priority: Priority' 1 - New Filter Presses - This project is already underway. Minneapolis is applying for $2 million in grant funding from CFA. If construction starts in 2009, the project will qualify for the grant. The expected fund amount will be approved in August 2009. With the improvements, the cost savings will be $500,000 to $1 million a year in sludge reduction costs. It was the group's consensus that MWW staff prepares a project summary and email to WAB members to use in a formal submission of support to the City of Minneapolis confirming their agreement with this priority. Priority 2 - Water Distribution Improvement - Annual program to rehabilitate or replace portions of 1,000 miles of old pipeline Approximately 10 to 15 miles are worked on annually. This priority does not directly affect the WAB. Priority 3 - Treatment Infrastructure Improvements - This project is proposed to avoid system failure. Project start is 2010 at a cost of $3 million. Priority 4 - MWW Facilities Security Improvements - Ongoing security improvements implemented annually at a cost of $250,000. Priority' 5- Hiawatha Water Maintenance Facilitv - Bonded initiative projected for 2014 at $3 million. This priority does not directly affect the WAB. Priority 6 - Minneapolis/St. Paul interconnect - Project projected for 2014 at a cost of $500,000. The Minneapolis/St. Paul interconnect project was not included in the priorities submitted to the CLlC this year and.Minneapolis communicated that information to the WAB at the last meeting. St. Paul does not have it included in their 10-year plan. Even though there is a placeholder for the project in 2014 for $500,000, the City needs to carry debt that will need to be repaid. St. Paul does not intend to pursue the interconnect project unless it receives money from the State of Minnesota. Mathisen would like to see the Minneapolis/St. Paul interconnect stay on the priority list and move it ahead of Priority #5. Most of the members agreed. The assumption is that this group can comment on the priorities, but not change the priorities. Any changes would be for future considerations on future priorities list. G:\JWC\WAB\M1NUTES\WAB Meeting Two Minutes.doc 4 Kotke acknowledges the importance the WAS has on addressing the taste and odor issue and suggests that the appropriate priority to address it would be in Priority #3. Catlin emphasized his support and the importance of the master plan and how it will assess the entire system and comprehensively compare the needs and help prioritize between all facilities. This is an operational budget item and currently has a study budget of $300,000. It would be appropriate for the WAS to make a recommendation to Minneapolis to move ahead with the study and have it underway by the end of the year. There was general support from the group to collaborate with Minneapolis to get the St. Paul interconnect project moving again and present it to the legislature. The group suggested working on the partnership as early as 2010 and recommended it be moved to the top of the priorities list. Issues the WAS would like to be addressed by Minneapolis include: . Taste and odor . Study backup water sources (other than interconnect) . Cost reductions (such as labor-can be addressed at the next meeting) . Existing wells . Transmission, redundancy, reliability Next Meeting Date and Time The next meeting will be held at the Columbia Heights Filtration Plant from 4:00 pm to 6:30 pm, on July 23, 2009. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:40 pm. ReSP)ClfUny submitted: ~i"AA~~ Pat Schutrop Administrative Assistant, City of Golden VaHey G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting Two Minutes.doc 5 Minneapolis Water Advisory Board Meeting Minutes August 27, 2009 - 4:00 pm - 6:30 pm In Attendance Sandra Colvin Roy, Council Member and CowChair, City of Minneapolis Linda Loomis, Mayor and CowChair, City of Golden Valley Tom Burt, City Manager, City of Golden Valley Steve Kotke, Director of Public Works, City of Minneapolis Shahin Rezania, Director of Water Treatment and District, Minneapolis Water Works Chris Catlin, Superintendent of Water Plant Operations, Minneapolis Water Works Roger Simonson, Finance, City of Minneapolis Brette Hjelle, Interagency Coordinator, City of Minneapolis Anne Norris, City Manager, City of Crystal Tom Mathisen, Director of Public Works, City of Crystal Bob Cockriel, Utilities Superintendent, City of Bloomington Wayne Houle, Director of Public Works, City of Edina Ruth Nelson, City Clerk, City of Hilltop Kathi Hemken, Mayor, City of New Hope Kirk McDonald, City Manager, City of New Hope Guy Johnson, Director of Public Works, City of New Hope Robert Nelson, Commissioner, Metropolitan Airports Commission Allen Dye, Project Manager, Metropolitan Airports Commission Scott Harder, Environmental Financial Group, Inc. Greg Stonehouse, HDR Engineering, Inc. CowChair Loomis called the meeting to order at 4:10 pm. Approval of Minutes MOVED by Kirk McDonald, seconded by Anne Norris and motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the June 25, 2009 meeting as submitted. Minneapolis Water Works (MWW) Budget Presentation (Steve Kotke) Steve Kotke discussed the budget trends and challenges. The budget presented was received by Mayor Rybak in early August and submitted to the Minneapolis City Council. Water Fund revenues come from utility bills and other water charges. The Water Fund is unique because its revenues cannot be used to fund other activities (such as street projects). The three major trends contributing to the challenge in developing the budget are a decrease in water consumption and revenue; increase in energy, chemical, and other operational costs; and fund balance requirements. Operational costs have increased significantly since 1997 largely due to energy and chemical costs. Sludge hauling costs have increased due to labor and increased fuel costs. MWW received $2 million in stimulus funding for the dewatering plant project. The new dewatering plant G;\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting Three Mlnutes.doc will greatly decrease sludge hauling costs. MWW continues to contain those expenses it has control over, such as constructing the dewatering plant, staff reductions, looking at different ways to treat water that use less chemicals, etc. The financial policy of Minneapolis is that the enterprise funds have a fund balance equal to three months operating fund in reserve. The MWW fund balance has fallen below that level due to decreased revenues and higher treatment costs. Every year, the city council adopts a 5-year plan that includes projected water rates. The rate increase for 2010 is 4.8%. It should be noted, however, that while rates have increased, total operating revenues did not due to decreased consumption. The budget will be adopted by mid-December. Kotke described the Water Fund Pro Forma (projected out to 2020) as reflecting the recommendation by the Department of Public Works to Mayor Rybak. The pro forma does not require approval by the Minneapolis City Council. One of MWWs goals is to get the water rates under control by evaluating ways to manage expenses and cut back in the distribution system. Selling more water helps to reduce rates. Mayor Loomis commented that the only way to sell water is if the customer does not have an alternative water supply, therefore increasing the sales to reduce expenses will not likely occur. Capital Recommendations (Sandra Colvin Roy/Linda Loomis) Since the last WAS meeting, the wholesale customers met as a group to discuss issues that were not addressed in the proposed capital plan and the lack of input early enough in the process to take a position on it. There was little consensus among the wholesale customer group as to the 2010 capital priorities proposed by MWW. Rather than take a position on the 2010 capital proposal, the wholesale customer group would like to be involved in next year's planning process before the plan goes to the Citizens Long Range Improvement Committee (CLlC). The group expressed an interest in addressing the following issues: taste and odor, lack of a backup water supply, and long-range capital planning. Moving forward in developing the 2011 capital proposal, the wholesale customers would like to meet at the start of the process to address those issues. This group would like a better understanding of the context and available trade-offs to make a more informed recommendation to the Mayor and Council. Kotke stated that the St. Paul interconnect and backup water supply matters would likely be stand-alone issues rather than integrated Into a 2011 capital proposal Mayor Loomis sees two separate customer interest groups: wholesale and retail. Wholesale customers are concerned about treatment, transmission and long-term viability and not distribution via small diameter pipelines. G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting Three Minutes.doc 2 Old Business: Water Conservation Rates (Steve Kotke) The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) gave a presentation at the June meeting concerning conservation rates for public suppliers. Areas of concern for the W AB include high water rates, drop in water usage, and using a water source that is more sustainable than the aquifers. A conservation rate proposal is required to be in use by January 2010. Wholesale customers will need to submit a conservation rate statement individually. Colvin Roy distributed a draft Drinking Water Conservation Rate statement for the group to consider. Questions to address are: 1. Would the group agree with the statements presented? 2. Does this group want to assist Minneapolis Water Works in preparation of its response to the DNR? The following comments were made for consideration in preparing a statement to the DNR: . List the individual cities agreeing with the statement versus calling it the "Minneapolis Advisory Board Member" statement. . Is there a differentiation in the legislation between wholesale and retail customers? Inquire about wholesale users being charged a conservation rate as a purchaser of Minneapolis water. . Look at winter and summer rates and what the differences are and do water restrictions affect the conservation rate. . Bullet No.1: Consider changing u".Water is a finite resource..." to "".Water is a valuable resource..." . Bullet No.3: Bob Cockriel sees a downward trend in non-essential water (sewer flow). He is not sure how many cities would agree with the statement on a per capita basis due to different water usage patterns. . Bullet No.4: Omit this buJlet. Encourage DNR to consider differences between the consumption of groundwater and surface water. Bullet No.4 recognizes differences In ground water and surface water usage. The DNR views ground water and surface water the same. Bloomington would abstain from voting on this statement. Loomis and Colvin Roy will refine the statement and send to the group in resolution form for the members to present to their city councils for adoption. Governance (Sandra Colvin Roy/Linda Loomis) Mayor Loomis asked how the WAB fits in with the CLlC. She views the WAS as a wholesale users group and the CLlC as a retail users group. The group discussed forming a technical advisory and a policy committee. Mayor Loomis does not favor forming two subcommittees and recommends that an ad hoc committee could be set up with the appropriate technical and policy expertise as necessary as well as provide representation on an advocacy group as the need arises. G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting Three Minutes.doc 3 The consensus of the group is that all WAB representatives would like to continue as members and receive agenda information with the understanding they will decide which meetings are appropriate for them to attend. Tom Burt sees this group as an effective tool to give input early in the process and over the long term develop a product that might attract more customers. Involvement of technical and policy participants contributes to a better partnership relationship. Next Steps (Sandra Colvin Roy/Linda Loomis) The group discussed frequency of meetings. A quarterly schedule may not fit with the timeline for the City of Minneapolis' budget submittal process. The next meeting will be in November and the agenda will include the taste and odor issue and options, associated costs and impacts those options will have on the rates; and backup plan options. Burt said rates are the first priority above taste and odor issues. A comment was made as to the value of proceeding with taste and odor projects as compared with the projects forwarded to the city council. How do taste and odor treatment improvements weigh against other projects that are on the list of priorities? Colvin Roy stated that Mayor Rybak welcomes the WAB's input and that the value of this group will be to add valuable Input as Minneapolis weighs its priorities. Another concern to address is how capital projects affect rates and that there are impacts associated with delaying projects. Kotke described the budget timetine and recommended a meeting be scheduled in January/February In order for the WAS to give input prior to the capital budget submittal in early March. Brette Hjelle will work out the schedule for the group. Next Meeting Date and Time The next meeting will be held sometime In November. HjeJle will communicate the date, location, and agenda to participants. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:20 pm. Respectfully submitted: JlcM~ P Schutrop Administrative Assistant, City of Golden Valley G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting Three Minutes.doc 4 Minneapolis Water Advisory Board Meeting No.4 Minutes December 9, 2009 - 4:00 pm to 6:30 pm In Attendance Sandra Colvin Roy, Council Member and Co-Chair, City of Minneapolis Linda Loomis, Mayor and Co-Chair, City of Golden Valley Tom Burt, City Manager, City of Golden Valley Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works, City of Golden Valley Steve Kotke, Director of Public Works, City of Minneapolis Bemie Bullert, Interim Director of Water Treatment & District, Minneapolis Water Works Chris Catlin, Superintendent of Water Plant Operations, Minneapolis Water Works Brette Hjelle, Interagency Coordinator, City of Minneapolis Anne Norris, City Manager, City of Crystal Tom Mathisen, Director of Public Works, City of Crystal Bob Cockriel, Utilities Superintendent, City of Bloomington Jesse Struve, City of Edina Kathi Hemken, Mayor, City of New Hope Kirk McDonald, City Manager, City of New Hope Guy Johnson, Director of Public Works, City of New Hope Allen Dye, Project Manager, Metropolitan Airports Commission Greg Stonehouse, HDR Engineering, Inc. Co-Chair Colvin Roy called the meeting to order at 4:12 pm. Approval of Agenda and Minutes Colvin Roy reviewed the agenda with those present and asked for additions. Receiving none, Mayor Kathi Hemken MOVED to approve the agenda and the motion carried unanimously to accept the agenda as presented. MOVED by Kirk McDonald, seconded by Anne Norris, and motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the August 27,2009 meeting as submitted. Housekeeping Items (Kotke) Introduction of Bemie Bullert. Interim Water Treatment and Distribution Director Shahin Rezania has been reassigned and Bemie Bullert will serve as Interim Director until April. Minneapolis is searching fora new director and anticipates the position will be filled by the end of February. Bullert will help with the transition. Fox 9 News Story on Untrafiltration Plant Fox 9 News interviewed Minneapolis staff regarding some issues (mainly with the membrane filters) at the Columbia Heights filtration plant. The intent was to communicate that it is common for the plant to go down in the winter months for maintenance purposes. Minneapolis staff consulted with suppliers and designers to understand the problem and made the decision to replace all of the membrane fiber filters in the plant with next generation components. The City agreed to a settlement of $1.5 million in exchange for all G:\JWC\WA8\MINUTES\WAB Meeling Four Mlnutes.doc new filter membranes and a new warranty period. Fox 9 News may be doing a follow-up segment in a few months. Budoet and Capital I mprovement Prooram (CIP) Update Minneapolis will indefinitely postpone the Fridley Ultrafiltration program from the CIP. The City contracted with one vendor and in settlement negotiations for the work performed to date. The Fridley filter press project is undelWay. Minneapolis received about $3 million in stimulus dollars, which is more than anticipated. The project is scheduled for completion in 2011. Minneapolis City Council passed the 2010 budget. Staff anticipates the 2009 water fund to end with a positive balance of about $2 million. Taste and Odor Cantrall Alternate Water Source (Catlin) Catlin presented a preliminary overview of options to address alternate water supply and taste and odor. The options will require additional engineering study. A duration plan should also be addressed. Because the two issues are interrelated, there may be similarities in the solution. Changes made to the water system will be required to meet compliance and regulation requirements. Alternate Water Supply Events driving the need for an alternate water supply are contamination of the Mississippi River, severe drought, or a treatment plant outage or malfunction. For most failures related to a treatment plant outage, recovery would be possible because of backup components available. A risk assessment would be necessary in order to prioritize the outages that could occur. Bullert recalled that a risk assessment was done when the St. Paul interconnect was studied in 2002 or 2003. Historically, the event with the highest risk is drought. Options for a river contamination event would be off-line storage, groundwater well drilling, or aquifer storage and recovery (A5R). Some contamination issues would need to be solved before the Fridley and Columbia Heights plants could be used. Off-line storage and ASR could be distributed throughout the system or clustered at existing facilities. ASR would be a huge water storage reservoir where finished water would be stored underground and the water would be recovered and fed out to the system. The water could be softened and also address the taste and odor issue. ASR has never been done with surface water in Minnesota. Additional options for an alternate water supply include connecting to other Utilities and other cities' utilities, and pursuing the 51. Paul Interconnect. Taste and Odor Control Taste and odor Issues are basically caused by two naturally occurring organic substances: methyl isobomeol (MIS) and geosmin. The concentration levels detected by a human nose are trace quantities (parts per trillion) and generally cyclic. Most of those trace quantities need to be removed to get good tasting and smelling water. Some technologies can make the problem worse with bacterial re-growth occurring in the system. Currently, Minneapolis G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting Four Minutes.doc 2 treats the water with a powdered activated carbon at a cost of about $1 million annually. Groundwater typically has no MIB or geosmin. Minneapolis would be seeking capital to address these Issues. The interconnect would benefit the group, but it is a costly project (about $42 million). Minneapolis would request state and federal funding if the inter:connect is pursued. At this point, Minneapolis has not added an interconnect cost to the CIP. Bullert recently attended the legislative session and the St. Paul Interconnect was discussed again. Both St. Paul and Minneapolis said this is not the time to pursue investing in the project due to funding. Bullert suggests looking at other options that may be more viable such as the off-line storage (earthen reservoir). He recommends further study of this option. Another option is taking a long succession of conduit, running wells along the conduit pipe, and directing the water source to the plant. An engineering study would need to be conducted to answer some of the questions (such as cost, economic, and nonmonetary comparisons). Colvin Roy asked that before an engineering study is requested, the group define which emergency to prepare for. The water stored in off-line storage would be untreated river water and algae would be a primary concern. Currently, Minneapolis' appropriation permit is for surface water and therefore Minneapolis would need DNR support for groundwater appropriation. Coupling with the use of groundwater, the aquifer recovery system could be in place with no increased appropriations projected. Mayor Loomis added thatthree of Minneapolis' customers have groundwater appropriation permits from the DNR. The Joint Water Commission is currently investigating wells as a backup supply to use for temporary water service. Mayor Loomis recommends that aquifer recovery may be a better backup and it would address the taste and odor concem. The Board discussed political ramifications in requesting the use of an aquifer for an alternate water supply. The Department of Health may question the procedure more than the DNR because of groundwater contamination concerns. The use of softened water may offset those concerns. Iowa and Wisconsin have used this method and there are many systems like this across the nation. The St. Paul regional system uses groundwater wells as a backup supply, but will continue to use surface water as its main source. Master Plan/Asset Manaqement Plan Minneapolis has been evaluating and prioritizing improvements necessary at its facilities. Many of the facilities are very old and are in need of upgrading. High failure and payback items will be evaluated first. The initial effort will focus on improving production (first quarter 2010). The outcome will be a 10-year plan and will be updated annually during the budget process. The plan will take about 6 months and a draft is expected by July 2010. Minneapolis is also looking at the distribution system and updating the modeling of the system. Kotke said the City would like to have this information available for planning the 2011 CIP; however, it is not likely that it will be ready for the Capital Long-Range Improvement G:\JWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeting Four Mlnutes.doc 3 Committee review (CLle). Therefore, staff will discuss It directly with the Mayor and City Council and the CLlC will be informed of this beforehand. Mathisen added that although finding an alternate water supply independent of the 8t. Paul interconnect is appealing, he would like a commitment from Minneapolis to solve the backup supply question and/or the taste and odor concern. Golden Valley receives many complaints about the taste and odor problem; however, addressing a backup supply is always a main concern. Colvin Roy asked which Issue is more urgent - the engineering study for an alternate water supply or taste and odor. Kotke said the solution for one could also be a solution for the other and makes sense to do them concurrently. Mayor Hemken said a priority for the cities is to have cost estimates so that the cities can plan their CIP budgets. 2010 Meeting Schedule I Topics (Hjelle) The 2010 meeting schedule was distributed with milestone dates. The proposed schedule is to help the WAB get on a reoccurring schedule that is in line with the Minneapolis budget schedule. The January 28, 2010 date is to provide input for Minneapolis' 2011 budget. Hjelle asked the Board to confirm the meeting dates with him Old Business: Water Conservation Rates (Kotke) According to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) website, water conservation rates are to be in place by January 1, 2010. The City of Minneapolis reviewed the DNR goals and In all categories, Minneapolis fell or exceeded those goals. Minneapolis interprets the rates currently in place as conservation rates. The City Council is In the process of adopting a resolution (a copy was included In the meeting packet) to submit to the DNR communicating that Minneapolis meets the legislative intent of the law. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 5:40 pm. Respectfully submitted: t1r~MJ1! Administrative Assistant, City of Golden Valley G:\lWC\WAB\MINUTES\WAB Meeling Four Minutes.doc 4 <j CLEAR 4400 Carillon Point I<irkland, WA 98033 p: 425.216-7600 f: 425~216-7900 www.clear.com March 22, 2010 Attention: Mr. Kirk McDonald City Manager City of New Hope 4401 Xylon Avenue New Hope, MN 55428 RE: Revised "Letter of Intent" from Clear Wireless LLC, also known as Clearwire to locate their Equipment for Wireless Services on the New Hope Water Tower, which is located at 2801 Hillsboro Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota. Dear Mr. McDonald, The purpose of this letter is to express Clearwire's interest in locating their Equipment on the New Hope Water Tower located at 2801 Hillsboro Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota. After our meeting on March 11, 2010, you had asked for a revised proposal from Clearwire. Below you will fmd a summary of that meeting, also attached are the Revised Clearwire Construction Drawings. 1. The JWC will Invoice Clearwire for $15,000.00 to cover Engineering and Attorney Fees incurred by the JWC. In addition, the JWC will provide Clearwire an Electronic Copy of the Proposed Lease Agreement for Clearwire Legal Review. 2. Lease Agreement Terms: $1,500.00 a Month Rent. 3% Annual Rental Increases. Initial Term of Five (5) Years, with (5) additional Five Year Options. 3. Clearwire will secure a Separate Utility Easement from KMS Management, which is responsible for the Apartment Complex where Clearwire will be required to pull Power to their Equipment. 4. Clearwire will move their proposed Equipment Location to the Northwest Comer of the Water Tower Compound; in addition Clearwire will Fence the North side of the Compound and Install an Access Gate for the other Carriers to use for Access to their Equipment. 5. Construction Concerns: Clearwire will make sure that the Compound for the Water Tower is Secure every night during Construction process. In addition, Clearwire will provide "As Built" Construction Drawings to the JWC after Clearwire has completed their Installation. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Chris Traiser Clearwore Minneapolis SSC Real Estate 2900 Thomas Avenue S. # 2431, Minneapolis, MN 55416 Cell: 612-701-4955 CONSULTANT TEAM PROJECT CONSULTANT: TERRA CONSULTING GROUP. L TO. 600 BUSSE HIGHWAY PARK RIDGE. IL 60068 (847) 698-6400 SURVEYING CONSULTANT: WIDSETH SMITH NOLTING 610 FILLMORE STREET. ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308-1028 (320) 335-5055 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: KRECH OJARD & ASSOCIATES 101 PUTNAM ST. EAU CLAIRE. WI 54703 (715) 552-7374 VICINITY MAP if ~t~~~> IIf1 ,~ ~lh " " ~. ~... 11 PROJECT ~ . . . CR" ii." , '"'''''''''''''' LOCATION :. ~..'" C R11I... . '. '. .)' .if............',:Jr. ".... ""'.'':.'. ' "'" ',.lli. "nlA\I"" . '< . iiil ""~.J:'::., ~ III. ;~,",,;", \ <,~ APPf-<OVALS CLEARWIRE CM CLEARWlRE RF CLEARWIRE PM CLEARWIRE MW LANDLORD clearw.rsM a simpler way to internet SITE NUMBER: MN-MSP0080 SITE NAME: GOLDEN VALLEY -169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. PROPOSED ANTENNAS ON EXISTING WATER TANK TOWER WITH RELATED RADIO EQUIPMENT AT BASE REGIONAL MAP i .N'i~oP'!o~:~'):'~o.~~~:;;;'; "" ,"; ..: ._~.\~' '~l il ; '. .I GO(d,:~.v.ni . I(lO ,.'~) .,:-; i: ..' F'~~jE~t I m<IVING Dlr-<ECTIONS t '~~. ~ ,>,,) DATE I FROM MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP) START OUT GOING NORTHWEST ON GLUMACK DR. 0.4 MI. TURN SLIGHT LEFT TOWARD RENTAL CAR RETURN. 0.4 MI. STAY STRAIGHT TO GO ONTO GLUMACK DR, 0.5 MI. MERGE ONTO MN-5 WTOWARD 1-494/BLOOMINGTON. 1.2 MI. MERGE ONTO 1-494 W/MN-5 W VIA THE EXIT ON THE LEFT, 9,1 MI. MERGE ONTO US-169 N VIA EXIT lOA. 10.3 MI. TAKE THE MEDICINE LAKE RD/CR-70 EXIT. 0.3 MI. TURN RIGHT ONTO MEDICINE LAKE RD/27TH AVE N/CR-70, 0,1 MI. TURN LEFT ONTO HILLSBORO AVE N, 0.1 MI. ARRIVE AT SITE. PROJECT INF'ORMA TION SITE NUMBER: SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY - 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN. 55427 APPLICANT: CLEARWlRE 8800 HIGHWAY 7 ST LOUIS PARK. MN. 55426 CLEARWlRE PROJECT MANAGER: MATT SONKE (303) 859-9696 TOWER OWNER: OTHER UTILITY PRIVATE LL / // LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: SPECIAL NOTES HANDICAPPED REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS NOT REQUIRED PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY HAS NO PLUMBING SHEET T-1 C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 A-1 ANT-1 ANT-1.5 ANT -2 ANT -3 E-1 E-2 E-3 SP-1 SP-2 S-1 S-2 10F2 20F2 SHEET INDEX DE.SCRIPTION TITLE SHEET SITE PLAN ENLARGED PLAN SITE DETAILS & CONCRETE NOTES H-FRAME! EQUIPMENT DETAILS DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA INSTALLATION DIAGRAM TOWER ELEVATION ANTENNA PLAN & ANTENNA SCHEDULE ANTENNA SUPPORT DETAILS & NOTES IF CABLE NOTES UTILITY ROUTING PLAN & DIAGRAM SITE GROUNDING DIAGRAM! PLAN LOAD CENTER DIAGRAM & DETAILS CONSTRUCTION NOTES ELECTRICAL NOTES STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENTS GENERAL NOTES & DETAILS DETAILS SUFNEY ATTACHMENTS PLAT OF SURVEY ANTENNA INVENTORY EXHIBIT REVISION ~Q) i g~g E ~~~ '- .e w~~ . c: '" xw '" F'./\""i ~.- ;J, "F~ r--U') ;;:<.", o ,..~ ll1~iw ;, i", lll'l": s.... ~ ~~ a~~~ '" '- ~~ ii~i \U 0)" ~l'jF Q) - l;; ~"'~~ 0. ~,,~ E ~iI!g - .- g~1 " (/) ~~ \oJ (0 ;;; L_.__.___.____.__ ~---- ~~ -=~:~ 0000 ",0... ;;; .c<O\!) I .2' .J I 0:) i I:-~cn a:1 <V qj(O~ WI ~ ~;::-~ mo:;1;o:) t- O-C..x o OJ: 0 (()(LQ.k ~~~ 9 ~-.-.n-;;r~m$! I- .,.. in [3 ~ ~ 1 1 1 z o ~ u ;: 0 ~ ~; Q g ~ ~ ~ !h rr. g" > IX 0 ::J ~ ~ ~ tI Ul W oc Q ~ ~ '!l 0 w \!'I ill '" ~I . I,' MN-MSP0080 1 1 iGOLDEN VALLEY .1 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE. MN 55427 [---.-.-----.-----8 DRAWN BY: . JLRILS _~_........_._____h__.h._.....~"_______._ CHECKED BY DM .----------..-------..------------.---- DATE 12111109 ---------.------.-.---.-.-::---.------. PROJECT # 43281 ----.-...-.---..-..--.----...... SHEEr nTLE TITLE SHEET SHEfiT NUMBER I Y-1 PROPOSED CLEARWlRE 7'xT LEASE AREA SEE SHEET C-2 FOR ENLARGED PLAN EXISTING RETAINING WALL (TYP.) EXISTING T-MOBllE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM EXISTING RETAINING WALL (TYP.) --- EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT SHELTER EXISTING SPRINT EQUIPMENT PLATFORM / ~~~~'OSED 12' WIDE DOUBLE ACCESS GATtl / r-{~~OPOSED CHAIN-LINK FENCE MATCH TO ~] ~_............_..._--_._-~ ..... PROPOSED 4' WIDE SWING GATE .'~'~~___________'."h'.___ APPROXIMATE R.OW I -- - - _._-.-.-----.....- - - ~- -..-..{~!~r~~~~~~r~!J ~ ~~~~R~~~~:~~LE -. - _.._-_........-=;:~--.....- ~ ;~~.~~~~~~~DE I .~ .'_",._ ._ '.._',_,._" 1/ "77';""...,..-_.*._._-7(-_...*~_.~,:;;f- ------------------------ ?,7/,7/,7////////////~77~/,77~/,7,?,?7/,77~~$ff$/,7,?,?77~;;01f W~/,7,?,?7;W7~?,?;W/,7,?,?7~/,7,?,?7ff~~.i% ~ . ~ - ...--.---............ - - ... ---~r .. '.. - _........ ....- - - . -.......-........-...... ... - . --........-...--- .. . EXISTING BUILDI1G ~ EXISTING BUILDING I / ~ I ~-_. EXISTING PARKING AREA~ ["P'ROPOSED CLEARWlRE DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS .._......._............ & PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON EXISTlpG WATER TANK TOWER. SEE SHEET ANT-1 F R ANTENNA PLAN & ELEVATION -....-.---------"--..-- I --------------~-- ~- EXISTING GRASS AREA....-~ THIS SITE PLAN WAS CREATED OFF OF FIELD MEASUREMENTS BY THE DESIGNER. AS BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS NOT SUPPLIED FOR PURPOSES OF SITE LAYOUT & UTILITY ROUTING. .-----.------ --~--- ----- _ _ __ _._._____u__."..~__..,I14~ EXISTNG BUILDING ~...... EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING GRASS AREA _.....~ 8fim'TE PLAN -- .._.~-*- ~~ SCALE: 1'" 50'.0" . , iE _....Z..__ W > <( o 0:: o a:l (f) -' -' I: 1:> '" II . ~ ~ ~ I ~-.-......-1 I o 12.5' 25' 50' SCALE IS FOR 11117 MEDIA (USE HALF SCALE FOR 24>36 MEOlA) :ll .... l1)~ '-.s . c ~ :>'0 ...~ ::=-..., ~~ ), ,. . . tIl?i~ ... ~ _x~ I"PIl l. ~ g '''' Q) ., (J.) ~ "' -,- 0: 1sill~ 5~: ~~li' "''"w "r.~~ ;~i~ l:\~"d x.~ b ~\\~" ~~",F t'5i",~ l~l';i! !:c~il I~~ ~~~ ~I II ~'(~ .. ~.+..-------_..- OJ ~ >,<DOo 000... ,,0,",(0 C<D~ I 'I2' =! OJ ~ . .01 <0 <lJ lj)<O" 1J)~t'- ~~~-<t mO::roro '" .. o-\.".. X 00.<: 0 <0 O. a. IL lUl~lg .- .... t() <( ~ .,.- (j ~ ~ z 0 fi " C/) a1 9 z 15 ;; !Z 0 w w iii i= er: :t 0. 0: Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ n:: (/) (,) W l'J ~ '" ~ ~ ~- 0 w "' '> Ul a: !i! I 'I ,c MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY - 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY. DATE P"OJECT IF. SHEE'llrlLE SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C-1 _~~~~?.SED L1GHT--' - --------''.....-.----.. I PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA --.---------......-.. l-~I f... \I ( --U II " II 'I I, I, II II II II II '\ II I, " I, II II II II II \1 II 1\ \\ \\ \~ ", -\ \\ \, \\ \\ \, \\ \\ \\ \\ ------ ~;--- \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ EXISTING GRASS AREA ~ THIS SITE PLAN WAS CREATED OFF OF FIELD MEASUREMENTS BY THE DESIGNER AS BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS NOT SUPPLIED FOR PURPOSES OF SITE LAYOUT & UTILITY ROUTING. *-*j ------------.)f---)( )(----~------ E.XISTI:~ T_-~OBILE-j EQUIPMENT PLATFORM *--.-.--...---- ----._._..--*..--..._~--.*--)( )( )( )( )(- * ---..,--T"/"'-r""r-r-T--y-r---; / / / / / / / / / // // / / / / / / / / / / / EXISTING NEXTEL / / EQUIPMENT SHELTER --~ / / / / / / / / / ./ / / ,/ / / / / / /' / ~f Lr~ EXISTING SPRINT EQUIPMENT PLATFORM _________________{;~!~~~;~.g~~~~~~OUND ~~~;~~~~~~~~~ ----,,-.------.- ---------.- -] PROPOSED CLEARWlRE DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS & PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON EXISTING WATER TANK TOWER. SEE SHEET ANT-1 FOR ANTENNA PLAN & ELEVATION -_.-*---_..._...---.- .......--_... .-.-- ~/' ~~ /' EXISTING WATER--------.-.---~-----------------.------ TOWER COAX PENETRATION ~.--- EXISTINGWATER TANKTOWER ~ { ---.--.---------------- PROPOSED CLEARWlRE WATERTANK PENETRATIONS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS. FOR DETAILS -~------ EXISTING PARKING AREA ~ (----.-.1. ~_~JTF;_.P_bAti - :7 SCALE: 1"= 10'.0" \? " ~ ~ ~ I ~--I_______----1 o 2.5' 5' 10' SCALE IS FOR 11x17MElllA 1 lI!SE tlAlF SCALE FOR 24x36~'^.l_ EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE (TYP.) -PROPOSED CHAIN-LINj ______--.-.--., FENCE MATCH TO . __-- EXISTING p---------.---- ~ __..;:",...--...\ ROPOSED 4' WIDE I ,/' SWING GATE ./ -----'---' ," .___.__ ~ ~~~~~~ UTILITY tr:/ [PROPOSE'o"uTiLiTYl .. _ !l-FRA~~ .--J ]J ------,,--- *-.-.-)f- EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER i11'\ Qj :;;iIJ~ "'"' E fi~i . !I:!i'l!i _ Q) if;J&: . ~ '" J!lllw :>.- ~ ",~~i :>.e ;; i\~!~ .... ". !tt~~ """ Ii filO s... to ~< "'~!ll! ~ go. ;i-g'" CO ",,'!l ~15~ loo "'5 . ~I!: Q) ~ 0.. (],) - :;; ll'l!s~ Q. ,-~~ E ~ . - .- ~~~ (.) : ~~i ~i il ~'(~ 9 >,i2 0 (; 000,.. ,,0"'<0 .l: <0<0 I .C!'..Jd, co r:Ol~ OJ 0)(0",- UlCfi'....r--- ~:2!;;: ... mfr:coCO .:I. " 0...., x 00<::0 <O(l.ll. U. l'!1~1~ .q .,. ~ o ~ (ry <f) 5 55 ~ <r z Q ~ ffi S z '> !;: ~ ~ ~ IX f2 ~ ?6 0 III ~ ~ ffi :Jl (L - fiI "' '> W << gl ,1.-' MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HllLSBORO AVE, N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 MILS OM 17)11109 43281 SHEET TITLE ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NUMIlER C-2 I PROPOSED CLEARWlRE WATERTANKPENETRATIONS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS. FOR DETAILS RF & BACKHAUL CABLE ENCLOSURE ,---'h'__ EXISTING WATER TANK ________ REFER TO STRUCTURAL ........---______ DWGS. FOR ROUTING ........--- DETAILS PROPOSED CLEARWlRE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. EQUIPMENT CABINET 3" EMT DOWN TO WEATHER PROOF ENCLOSURE. CONTRACTOR IS TO CONNECT USING 3" WATERTIGHT MYERS HUB OR EQUAL GRADE ,\, ,\, \' \ \' \"-~ PROPOSED UNDERGROUND . "" ~ (2) 3"0 EMT CONDUITS / II ~~, /ij ~ ~= = - = = = ~:= == =-=.:::.=' = = == =:.:~~~ C"J:V--.PIQ~L EQl!!PMJ;!'lT~1.E:.Y~J!QtII ~ SCALE: N.T.S. e:... 3" SCH. 40 x 9'-0" ...............__ ........... LONG GALV. PIPE W/ GALV. CAP C-~6' .....METER _ c~d = 91 ... <0 r.... [;::3 ~..- DISCONNECT .. .............. ..... UNISTRUT ~1 #2 BCWTO EQUIP GROUND . ... .....~...C3..~QE ..1-' I \ (TVP. OF 2) r J I.. 1'1 \ .___...1 #2,3/4" C " ~) 1-,1 'JI (I I, '<t' _ I I . <014 .11114.....h-< TO EXISTING t .:; U.' LIGHTNING RING ...1 -<I _ _..__4__!.._ 5/8"0 X 1 0' COPPERCALD ROD (TYP.) NOTE: ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED BY CONTRACTOR LU...H~FRt\.M.!;J!E.!~.P.e~JCABL~l ~~7 SCALE: N.T.S. I I I I I U I L. ..... .......1 ... PROPOSED LIGHT. CtEAffif~RE KIT #CWR-FLOOD-T ........ PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA ....... PROPOSED H-FRAME SEE SHEET C-4 FOR DETAILS GENERAk~OTES~ 1. THE BASIC WIND SPEED UTILIZED FOR OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS IS 90 MPH PER IBC (LATEST EDITION). 2. INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS WAS OBTAINED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. S. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND HIS SUBCONSUL TANTS SHALL BE RESPONSIB'L€ fOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED FOR loWE WORK. 4. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AISC SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL BUILDINGS. ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN AND PLASTIC DESIGN INCLUDING THE COMMENTARY AND THE AISC CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE. 5. STRUCTURAL STEEL PLATES AND SHAPES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM AS6. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL PIPES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A53 GRADE B. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL PIPES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM MOO GRADE B. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL COMPONENTS AND FABRICATED ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. 6. WELDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AWS) D.1.1.96. STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE-STEEL WELD ELECTRODES SHALL BE E70XX. FIELD TOUCH-UP WITH ZINC RICH PAINT (ALL EXISTING AND NEW AREAS) AFTER WELDING IS COMPLETE. 7. ALL THREADED STRUCTURAL FASTENERS FOR ANTENNA SUPPORT ASSEMBLIES SHAlL CONFORM TO ASTM A307 OR ASTM A36. ALL STRUCTURAL FASTENERS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAMING SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A325. FASTENERS SHALL BE 5/8" MIN. DIAMETER BEARING TYPE CONNECTIONS WITH THREADS EXCLUDED IN THE SHEAR PLANE. ALL EXPOSED FASTENERS, NUTS, AND WASHERS SHALL BE GALVANIZED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHORS SHALL BE HIL TI KWIK BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL ANCHORS INTO CONCRETE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 8. ALL COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTORS AND TRANSMITTER EQUIPMENT SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE OWNER AND IS NOT INCLUDED IN THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL CONNECTION HARDWARE REQUIRED TO SECURE THE CABLES. ETHERNET CABLES SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE TOWER WAVEGUIDE LADDER USING UV-RESISTANT TIE WRAPS OR STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE. 9. NORTH ARROW SHOWN ON PLANS REFERS TO TRUE NORTH. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY NORTH AND INFORM ENGINEER ANY DISCREPANCY BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 10. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM 615 GRADE 60, DEFORMED BILLET STEEL BARS. 11. CONCRETE FOR THE EQUIPMENT PAD SHALL BE 4000 PSI NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE WITH FIBERMESH ADMIXTURE. CONTRACTOR MAY USE APPROVED PRECAST EQUIVALENT. 12. LUMBER SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF TIMBER CONSTRUCTION AND THE NATIONAL FOREST PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION'S NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION. ALL LUMBER SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED AND SHALL BE STRUCTURAL GRADE NO.2 OR BETTER. 13. IT IS THE OWNERS RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE STRUCTURAL CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING TOWER AND ITS FOUNDATION TO RESIST THE WIND/GRAVITY LOADS FROM THE PROPOSED ANTENNAS. 14. ALL FIELD CUT METAL WILL BE SCRAPED OF ANY RUST AND COLD GALVANIZED. 15. RUBBER CAPS WILL BE PLACED ON ALL EXPOSED UNISTRUT ENDS. '" .... '"Q) Q) t-E ! . c '" ;:.- :.;! o ,...:H .... >.~ ), g . . III:'~ __ ~ J:~ ca .. ~1i Q)" 0)0. :;; _E c.:>: ~l ml ~~~ V~ l!!1~ ., ~ o \! (f) ~ a Z > - 2 ll! !!! !l. 0: Gi 5&: 0:: <fj 0 '" '" o :l <fj !!1 ~llIg ~~i ~~~ /1m" ~~.:,,1lI :.J:<a~ n~~ aifilt> ~t-,;~ n~i ~'l!,F ;;_:::F ..ll..iS ~~g ~~~ ~ ~ to ~ ;';{goo ~o~~ .<::<0<0 I Q>..J I 00 I--.ij;~ <Il <IlID, Ul~!,- UlU!'-<;j- ci5n:;ijro " .. O''L.. x o O.c 0 r.on.Cl.IL. MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY - 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 f....--...........__......_-~.. DRAWN BY: JLR ...~~~~KEO ;~:......._...........~~ ~-.-_-.:_----_..._.._-------_..... OATE: 12111109 ---------_..._.__._.~---.--_.... PROJECT II; 43281 -----.....---....--------.. SHEET -nTLE SITE DETAILS & CONCRETE NOTES SHEET NUMBER C-3 ELECTRICAl PANEL 1/4"x3"x24" PLATE- ....................-...-..-........--.......-E, -.- ELECTRICAL PANEL I- I RF & BACKHAUL CABLE ENCLOSURE SITE SUPPORT CABINET ..... RF & BACKHAUL CABLE ENCLOSURE . o '" 1/2" 0 GALVANIZED BOLT (TYP.) . o l() 3" 0 STD. wr -..-......... GAlVANIZED PIPE UNISTRUT P1000 (TYP. OF 3) . . 1/2" 0 U-BOLT .. "'1~ FOR 3" 0 STD. wr. PIPE (TYP.) -..-.......-......----...........- ...---PLA TFORM ASSEMBLY DDB MODEL # PMS-3030 -....-.-..-- PLATFORM ASSEM8L Y DDB MODEL # PMS-3030 Z ...I~ ......-EXISTING GRAVEL COMPOUND EXISTING GRAVEL COMPOUND it< it< ",I~ :; ...........VIRGIN SOIL OR COMPACTED BACKFILL WITH A MINIMUM BEARING CAPACITY OF 2,000 PSF, TYP. BACKFILL WITH A MINIMUM BEARING CAPACITY OF 2,000 PSF, TYP. ",I~ :; it> oq: --#3 TIES@12"O.C. (TYP.) it> oq: .....-.....(4) #5 BARS EQUALLY SPACED (TYP.) -CONCRETE PIER (TYP.) CABINET ELEVATION B _____h_h..... .._______...____._.___.____ L-....-.....-............-..---.- --.-..--------..--..- CONCRETE STRENGTH: .---.---------------------.-- ----.. f 'e = 3,000 PSI Rebar: Grade 60 ---...--.-.----.-.----...-...----------- .------.-.--....-.-.-.--.-.------ 1I4"x3''x24'' PLATE ~.--~~~AC /if- -CONCRETE PIER (TYP.) 1/2" 0 U-BOL T ----------.-- L_J L__...1: --- - 3" 0 STD. wr ~~~~rowr. S-.;~~~J~k~ ~~L=':.:~ / - - , / ,,(TYP. OF 3) / \ 0> ~J \ --.-.-....-.O-------..,-[J1 0\_/1 ~~--ELECTRICAL ~)' / PANEL / /' U .-..-.-------..---.--.-----...-...-.--..----....-.-.-] NOTE: THEH-FRAME DESIGN WAS PROVIDED BY CLEARWlRE & IS A KIT WHICH CAN BE PURCHASED THROUGH CLEARWlRE. .....-----------.......---..----.--....----------..... RF & BACKHAUL---- CABLE ENCLOSURE --- E.-.J~ J;;~_SLNJ;I..e18N.JEQ~J 1~..9~E"J~~Q_!.JJ~I) 7 SCALE: N.T.S. " .... f-Q) G) '-~ . .... c '" ~'- ;;; o "", .....~j >. " - '- ~ j,it ;> g~ CO I.. ::l(l G) .. 0)0. In _E (.) ': ~ill~ e;s~ &'" Il:d :gili'l! !a~f-1i! ~i~! '.i!~J'-d i\;;~~ ~~g~ ~~,,~ ~g!i~ ~"'~~ f" di if; ~ Ie I1l ~ ;j >,WOo oOo.q. ;:0...", .cW<D I .2'_J I <Xl i r.--~~ ~ I ... OJ"',,- iJl~" Wi ~['U.;;~~ /Xl ~. ro 1< .. 0...." x L.. OOLO r- <0 0.. 0.. It_ ~~~ .~ '__.'_'_.__~-.Y_h_.'.' _.... ~__~_ ~I~ " 5 (j) ~ ~ 5 ~ 51 If. l5 li! ~ ~ ~ i d I' Z MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 [---....--..----...----.----..- DRAWN BY: __ ,.IlR ..._._____......____.....:..i.......__._____ CHECKED BY: OM .h___....._._____.____._.~..__.. DATE: 12111109 _.__h.__...__............ ___ PROJECT #; 43281 -----.----.--.-.--.---------- SHEET TiTlE H-FRAMEI EQUIPMENT DETAILS SHEET NUMBeR C-4 DRAGON WAVE RADIO .....~ ~~.~~~ ~~~~~~s;.~.......~ill-.. .... 3402.17.C N FEMALE .. .. TO N MALE . ---.....---.........---.-.- .l 'f ~.--~ ...... COMMSCOPE FXL780 Cj ~ ~~L~~~~~..~~..B~E ..J....~.-m DRAGONWAVE IOU 7=I ...... -... d I .- .............-;--..._) .~~ERNET; SERIAL HUBER SUHNER SURGE .J SUPPRESSOR 3402.17.C N I FOUNDRY NETWORKS FEMALE TO N MALE FAST EDGE 2402 ---~.....+-~-------- .. ANDREWS OR RADIOWAVE MICROWAVE DISH Q.----.--- OMNITRONIX S~~~=L~~~~ .h hE~~;~~;~~~'~~:;'1-- --[ VALERE I ______h 6U$Pll1 POWER ___.___ _._..______b__,.... GROUND BAR IN-------------..- TELCO BOX . NOTE: THE SFX RF JUMPER CABLE MAY BE OMITTED ALLOWING THE MAIN FEED LINE TO BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO THE HUBER-SUHNER SURGE SUPPRESSOR LOCATED ON THE DRAGONWAVE RADIO. THE TOWER TOP "N" FEMALE CONNECTOR ON THE MAIN FEED LINE WILL BE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH AN "N" MALE TO ALLOW CONNECTION TO THE SURGE SUPPRESSOR. DRAGONWAVE ARCHITECTURE MOTOROLA PTP 400 OUTDOOR UNIT r'~~N~~~~o"RE} .. $.h f(~_ 'CAT5E I~\ ~;( BELDEN '----~ MPER CABLES 7919 .,,---.---___...~._ RF JULE TO N MALE) (NMA .----- ANDREWS ANDP2F25NXA ANTENNA TELCO ENCLO~~RE r- ~l~=----l I ..T JI ...-.l ETHERNET r--'O~-~;:;:~-;;~~"l --- --.-------- c:7h--_.~.h_.______________l LSNMP.L1NK ~ ~===- VALERE TRANSTECTOR -, [FO~~O"o~:J'{~dLp~W""J MOTOROLA ARCHITECTURE - (ORIH9GOl\il DRAGON WAVE HORIZON TRANSCEIVER/MODEM CAT 5 __h BELDEN 7919A ANDREWS OR RADIOWAVE ",.;;# MICROWAVE DISH ~:~~J-~L ETHERNET]]OUT-OF-BAND 1\ ________.__.__ w~~ I MANAGEMENTI~"~~6'~J:~~E I-h_hhh-- ~ ~ -hIT-----h-----.-- FOUNDRY NETWORKS I --. ----------.--.---] FAST EDGE 2402 __ ~",d VALERE.~~~.~. L__.________~.~_.______h_...._+___h__+____ . DRAGONWA VE COMPACT HORIZON ARCHITECTURE POL YPHASER (LSXL.ME) LIGHTNING ARRESTOR (N MALE TO N FEMALE) /.-.- REDlINE T58 TRANSCEIVER POLYPHASER(103-1125T-A) -..----. I I.-ANDREWS LIGHTNING ARRESTOR ANDP2F25NXA (F FEMALE TO F FEMALE) (---7) ANTENNA BELDEN 7916 (0-225') OR ----. '- l RG11 CABLE (225'-300') '- I (F MALE TO F MALE) '" . ['. - ---- .---] . 1l r -. --' .--... .----~.-. .--7.--- }1} .-----. . ~S~"_.. -----18" RF JUMPER CABLES (N MALE TO N MALE) C" 6' LMR 240 CABLE 4.'..--.'E---mm ~~E::::::~EI 7----. ---- .------.----.----- ----.-- -----..------ __._..________ ____.__~ ------ ETHERNETDsERIAL ~-------------------~-- CITEL PSAX09 F'^"FF -- .---.--- OMNITRONIX _ VVI ----------- SNMP-L1NK SL81 UGHTNING ARRESTOR l FOUNORY NElWlRK1l r':~=-~=:---'} 1~---------'-'~ (F FEMALE TO F FEMALE) FAST EDGE 2402 -- OMNITRONIXPOWER ---- VALERE ----- BIJS P61 POWER GROUND BAR IN -----------------.--.- ...---.----------.--- .-.---.-.----. '------------.-. TELCO BOX REDLlNE ARCHITECTURE (MOD(:M CONFIGURATION) THE AIR SYSTEM CONSISTS OF A MODEM UNIT MATCHED WITH DRAGONLlNK RADIO. WHEN USING THE SPLIT IDU/ODU CONFIGURATION. THE MODEM UNIT IS LOCATED INDOORS OR WITHIN A WEATHERED RESISTANT ENCLOSURE. AN IF CABLE IS CONNECTED BETWEEN THE MODEM UNIT AND THE RADIO ASSEMBLY WHICH IS TYPICALLY MOUNTED DIRECTLY TO THE DISH ANTENNA. THE ODU CONFIGURATION CONSISTS OF AN OUTDOOR UNIT CONTANING ALL MODEM FUNCTIONALITY. SINCE THE ODU IS TOWER MOUNTED. THE IF CABLE CONSISTS OF A SHORT JUMPER CONNECTING THE ODU DIRECTLY TO THE RADIO/ANTENNAASSEMBLY. IOU (MODEM) 6J:.__._.______.__,g;;;;gJ,".."...".....".--. ~=--...""".,.'..."-",,,.,'=..,,"!.,..'..-""""""~'I;;.~. DRAGONWAVECOMPACT HORIZON ARCHITECTURE MOTOROLA PTP 400 - OUTDOOR UNIT ----. ANDREWS ANDP2F25NXA ANTENNA POL YPHASER (LSXL-ME) .- LIGHTNING ARRESTOR (N MALE TO N FEMALE) '-'1 --J~'-'--- .---------.--.--..----------- ~ r----.---- .-. CAT 5E .....__.___. BELDEN 7919 SHIELDED BLACK CABLE SHIELDED RJ45 CONNECTOR RF JUMPER CABLES (N MALE TO N MALE) TELCO ENCLOSURE r" t}-:..~-~-- .1 ____________.__~--J U J ETHERNET -..------.-------- POECABLE ..1--. - -- -r.----------..---.L..-------..----.-)11~;;.,~~~t81 FOUNDRY NETWORKS ------ POWER INJECTOR---- FAST EDGE 2402 . OMNIT:~~:,:;OWE. ,~..--~.~-----_.~.~.__.,._"+._-----~ .+...__.,._.-.--~----_. REDLlNE ARCHITECTURE (POE CONFIGURATION) '" .... "(1) Q) s....E 11 .~.5 ~ o r-.~ ..... )-..z ~" s.... >- ,Ji" iU z~ '" ~ g~ \U '- ~:J Q) 3 (])o.;;; _E 0": blll~ ~g~ i~~ ~Jiww ;~::~ -fc~~ ~5~d ~'g ~ ~!I~ !Iii,,!; ~a(l\~ ~g&1~ ..~" ~'"S ~\l''' o"!! ~dif: ~ III ig ",:gOO l . 000..;- a. 3'0. "'0 I .cID!l) I .2" _I J. to I :r:-.o;~ '" "'ID'-., WI ~ .ii;:::-~ ciJCl:;I;tO I- O.:C..x o a.c 0 IDO.a. ... ~"(~ . .-........----------- IL~J ~. . h.'____.'____..____..____ rJ) 5 in ~ 0:: ~ z > ~ lIi! !1 '" 5 f:2 "' 0 w w o :J "' !!! 01 I Z MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY - 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBOROAVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 DRAWN BY' JtR CHECKED BY' OM DATE: 12/11109 PROJECT #: 43281 [---------.---------.---.---J SHEET TITLE --._--I.~~~~~~~~.--_.- [-......----....----.....--J SHEET NUMBER A-1 -.--....-----------...-----."- NOTE: PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL! PANELANTENNAS~LLBE POSITIONED BASED ON PENDING DIRECTIONAL DESIGN AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. CLEAR~RE CM IS TO VERIFY ANTENNAS AND MOUNT~TH STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. " ... 'Q)Q) ~~ E /.:ltl s... ~~; . 2 ll~i 3:.5 ~ ~;~! g :~ ffiii )0. ~'" ~~. s... as G~ l'i"~~ ~ 5:.. '.i~ ~ CO .. I~ iJ!~ (1).92 };; ~ €Iii 0. _i!!~ E ~. -'(ij ~II (.) as ~~lii r-.---...- NOTE: ADD ANY STABIUZA TION OF THE DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS PER THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS .~~-_.._.--_....--_..~- -------.- ~---- ~I ml ~'{~ .. ---.------..-- n:J >,f!)oo oOo-<t "ovlO .cf!)(j) I .2'..lei:, a) I-.(jJ~ (l) <lJ<D'.... \:l.g"....1'- "...1'- 'f (lJCC;;!)n:J ot"x o o.c 0 <Dll.o..l... ~ NEW HOPE gl~11 -1 o <C i.n 00 +1 . (/) ~ EXISTING CARRIER m ANTENNAS .... z <( ILl a::: ~ a::: lti -l (.) o I I PROPOSED CLEAR~RE (2) ~ 2" INNERDUCT CONDUITS 2 AND RET CABLES. o a::: 0- :5 a::: I , PROPOSED CLEAR~RE ~ GROUND KIT AT BASE z ILl (.) g WROPOSED CLEAR~RE w EQUIPMENT CABINET ON A............... 1_~R~:~~~~E~~_r_~_ ,----,/ [; ~_.._.- PROPOSED CLEAR~RE - GROUND KIT AT RAD CENTER -----_.~-_..._-~..--_.._.--- ~ o iii 5 w 0:: z: o ~ () :;: 3 z ~ !i: o UJ UJ i= u: :E Q. a: fb 5 f? a I/) 0 ill lU W '" o :;, UJ ~ "- - fil !II Gi lY. ~~R~~~;1t~~~RE ] ANTENNAS o z ~ EXISTING WATER / TOWER MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE. MN 55427 GRADE ___.:.:-_:::::::':::::::::-..:l..._~__~__~_.___...__.___...__.._~ DRAWN BY' JlRILS CHECKEOSY' OM DATE 12Jl1/ll9 PROJECT it 43281 I.........---.--.---J SHEETTITlE TOWER ELEVATION h.~.~__.~.._____--"_'~_h' ......--.- ---....-j SHEET NUMBER ANT -1 ..-._..-~ --- ~_.,-_._----~_._-- E.--j~..IQ~.F;B...E;.b!;_Y't\I!.Q.N '7 SCALE: 1" :: 20'-0" ~-_._.............._._................. NOTE: PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL! PANEL ANTENNAS WILL BE POSITIONED BASED ON PENDING STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS _'~._~'+________'k'~'"'.+_+_._______________'h'+'~..__ ~~~OSED"PANEL ANTEiij"NA". Li~__...+.~_____....+^+_.___.___ ...._- ~ IsEESiiluc':'N,\^':'NA _ &. Il~~~i-~~AILSJ"':".~:L ~ l!/I~/ m 0/0/ )> ~..,..'-."-....-" N _..._..___._~"-- II .._ l!o m ~ , . ~. ~"VO~ ~ ~ -~;1j ~ -P.HEM(rv~ /I ~ ~ IPROf'OSED"'_........_)} ~ ~ Ww :;l- c:r::c:r:: 1-0 #- OF WHITE I TRANSMIT I AZ I ODU I MODEL #- '-- ~ pORBANDS PATH TYPE _..__.~.+._._-_.._- .-.---.-.._+ SECTOR. 1 DIRECTIONAL 1 I TBD I TBD' I I TBO ANTENNA ...._.---_..~.- _.~m __ , SECTOR - 2 EXISTING ANTENNAS ._.L....--...---...---.----. v-y-:::'~. ie ''-do. DIRECTIONAL I 2 I 45203 I 183.769' I I VHlP2-18 ANTENNA _".____h__+_.____h__ ~~~=R-m_~ /~ SECTOR - 3 DIRECTIONAL I 3 I 45322 I 353.5315' I I VHLPl-23 ANTENNA ----.-----.....- I I SECTOR AZ I MODEL #- COLOR CODING I I j SECTOR-1 I RED I I KATHREIN PANEL ANTENNA 30' 840 10054 [~~~~~:~~~~!.~:}- I I :~0~tJ~~~*:t-. ~1~~ NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY FINAL RF & BACKHAUl DESIGN WITH ClEARWlRE CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO INSURE NO UPDATES WERE MADE SINCE TIME OF FINAL ISSUANCE. .--..----.-1-..-E.............- RECEIVE RAO COAX CABLE TABLE DIA QUAN -....---... ..-- ......-......--.. ... ......-- _. _Jm S"".m "-EN":'. .\.'.^"~ USEJ.'RUNSrOOEJ# ~.ii~I.:EN~:~ TBOor.?) I MN-MSPTBO I :!:85' 1 - 1 -- 112 I :!:175' :i[;:t-:~I~+ .m~t~.~..i .~~~f:: :::: .....__.......__i.__~...[..._.~._...............__~___......-.....-...-.... RAO CENTER COAX CABLE TABLE ~E!~~~~~: . 1 I - I 112 :!:175' QUAN LENGTH :!:85' :!:175' :!:85' :!:85' 112 :!:175' EB-~~~~~~&:9~J~~~~~N1&IiQN L~~~E~?!~~~~~f~~~~-~~~H~.RJ)LE;. O~i.__.-..-.._..........._.-.._-_...--_.__.._- ~ .... Q)G> s...E S . c: '" ~.- 9; o r--,lll .... ~~ >. j!. '- to \f~ CO ~ ~~ ... .,8 G> J Q)a ~ _E (..,.: ~i!ig iit;i ~.!; f~" ~~i ",1\ ~ ;~~~ ~~~:'J ,~~ h~~ r~~ ;~1i~ ..i!!~ii1 ~~~ ~~g ~~~ ~G f I ml ~~~ -,y .....__...Y_.~.....____._. (() ;>,:ggo go,,;,!; ~: <O(() I .2'...1 J, U) r:....~m . .0'> <0 '" (\)"''' m <fi',.,1'- ~:2';;:... mIXo:JOCl .:i. .. o \.. -, X 00<:: " tOQ..fl.lL I!!I~ <( .. o ~ '" 15 iii ~ a:: ~ B Gj ,- '" S\, '" 0: l2 M 0 ul 'u o ::> ~ 6 z MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY -, 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 DRAWN BY JLR CHECKED BY: DM MTE 1~1m PROJECa 43281 [...---.....-........--....] SHEET 11TlE ANTENNA PLAN & ANTENNA SCHEDULE ._~.~_.,..----_..._--_....__...- SHEET NUMBER ANT -1.5 ~ SIDE VIEW '__~+__.._.___h'___...._ {--------- -- PROPOSE ---- _______::~~:~~------ 0 GALV. PIPE c~~- 1 PR~~.:r:~~~"NA]~ I [ SUITABLE FOR MOUNTING TO 65mm-115mm (2.5' TO 4.5') PIPE (NOT SUPPLIED) L-_~~fg~~~L:~~-~_::]----- [-------------------------------------} PROPOSED RADIO -----------------_._ - ....- '~'-.- ---.{;i~~~~~~D~~~~~~;;.~~_ ------{~=D~~;~~~~~~;~~;r.l NOTE: ADD ANY STABILIZATION OF THE MICROWAVE ANTENNAS PER THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ~.---....----12"i5TSHANTENNA.--~- _.QI.r\Jli;:f!~JQ.~S IN mm (IN~!:l.E.~ . A _______.__~~ll___.{1~:~.QL.._____._ _____~_____ ________._ 35~~QL___.__ ___.9____ ._..__ 72 (2.8QL_.___ _ D _____._____1.<1:~___(5..601___.____ 1._'1"J'!1EL._...J SIDE YIE..\f.l HORIZONTAL COMPACT ODU UNIT BOLT TO MW ANTENNA REAR AS REQUIRED E t--- I ~-----~';--i5iSH--ANfENNiC-------l __~!r..4~~~I.Q~~ IN mm (1_~_9_!:lg~1 ____;-.---r.__________~~}.-t~~~1~=~==.- ----tt::---.:=kl~:::~~:k:---~-.-~~=::: SCALE:NTS e-:J_PIRJ::PlQt-!ALJ\l'IT!;i'lNA.QET AII.,~ ~7 SCALE. N.T.S. TYPICAL ANTENNA SUPPORT DETAIL --........-.--.......----- SEPARATION IN FEET, MEASURING FROM ANTENNA EDGE TO ANTENNA EDGE 1. All ANTENNAS FURNISHED WITH DOWNTIL T BRACKETS. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REQUIRED MECHANICAL DOWNTIL T FOR EACH ANTENNA WITH RF ENGINEER.) 2. ANTENNA CENTERLINE HEIGHT IS IN REFERENCE TO ELEVATION 0'-0". ANTENNA HEIGHTS ARE SHOWN ON TOWER ELEVATION 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANTENNA TYPE, CABLE TYPE, AND AZIMUTH WITH RF ENGINEER AND/OR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION_ 4. LOCAL MAGNETIC DECLINATION FACTOR, PER THE NATIONAL GEOPHYSICAL DATA CENTER IS 500'W BY 007'W PER YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ANTENNA SEPARATION ISOLATION TO AVOID PATTERN DEFORMATION FREQUENCY IN MHZ (WIRELESS CARRIERS) 746 TO 606 (UPPER 700 MHz BAND, FUTURE USE) 606 TO 946 (SPRINT iDEN, ATT, VERIZON) MINIMUM I PREFERRED HORIZONTAL HORIZONTAL VERTICAL 2 4 EX: THIS ANTENNA ~.~~~ 60' 2 2 4 2 1710 TO 2000 (SPRINT, ATT' VERIZON, T-MOBILE, CRICKET, METRO PCS) 2 2 2 2 2496 - 2690 (ClEARWIRE INiMAX, OTHER BRS BAN OPERATORS) MICROWAVE BACKHAUL REFER TO MICROWAVE BACKHAUl SECTION BELOW ANTENNAS WITHIN THIS RANGE SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN THE YELLOW SECTOR ANTENNAS WITHIN THIS RANGE SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN THE BLUE SECTOR CAVEAT: USING THIS APPROACH, THE "VERTICAL" ANTENNAS MUST BE EXACTLY VERTICALLY ALIGNED. ANY OFFSET Will REQUIRED ADDITIONAL SEPARATION: THE RECOMMENDATION THEN IS TO USE THE HORIZONTAL SEPARATION VALUES * MINIMUM 2 INCHES (15 INCHES PREFERRED) OF VERTICAL SPACING, AS MEASURED FROM RADOME EDGES ffiAfiT!=l'INA_~I"AG1t4G MA TRI~EQ8.AeBJI!TENi'lAS 180. ~i'lIEN1'l_A_~EGTOR ~AMI.f\lG SECTOR --KiiARKING'METHOD 1 COLORED BANOS J!;~t~:~i.~; :--~_----~~~~=:__=-------~-: NOTE: 1. MARK-CABLES @ TOP & BOTTOM. 2. CABLES SHALL BE ROUTED IN 2"0INNERDUCT & ATTACHED TO TOWER WAVEGUIDE LADDER USING UV-RESISTANT BLACK CABLE TIES WITH 40LB MINIMUM BREAKING STRENGTH OR IN TOWER. W~_QLq~__~.9DIN~__(~N!~_~N~l. C7SCALE: N.T.S. # OF WHITE BANOS 1st DIRECTIONAL FROM 00 GOING CLOCKWISE ._~-~-~.-_._~.~.~-_.~---- 2nd DIRECTIONAL FROM 0 GOING CLOCKWISE ~~_._._------~.._--_._._~. 3rd DIRECTIONAL FROM 0.' GOING CLOCKWISE --.~-----_.~...,--~--_._...-_. 4th DIRECTIONAL FROM O' GOING CLOCKWISE ...___h.~_____.________.~.+ 5th DIRECTIONAL FROM 00 GOING CLOCKWISE 2 3 4 5 e__DCOL~~O!:)IN(3JDIREc:'!I()N~L) - SCALE: N.T.S. ~<D Q) L..E 2 . c: '" ~.- ~ o ~'." ... >- z >. ~:1E L.. lU ~~ CO :> 0"- ;> t:'Jt/1 '- ~?3 Q) .J Q) 0. t;, _E t): <!Iwi!i ~o~ !i~ Il'~~ "'''w "~i!!~ i~. .~~ ~"'<l 'l!", un '<:g5i ~~51~ _h, ~ ' ~!i ~! =1 w~ t-I ~~~ ~. _____h...._.,. --....--------- ~"r~- <( ~ o i'! fO >>'noo 000<1' ",0"<0 {i,tO ~ I i=J(!)~ .())<.o ~ ~"- "'lJl'l' .,.-.;- .;- tiJll::<.(J<O ().C., X Gaco <DO_ iL u. C/) ~ C/) ~ a:: ~I , MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY -, 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HlllSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE. MN 55427 DRAWN BY; CHECKED tlY; DATE; PROJECT II; 43281 c---.-----.---.-....---------- SHE_TTITlE ANTENNA SUPPORT DETAILS & NOTES ---- [-.---.------------------. ----- SHEET NUMBER ANT -2 ----_._.~....__._--_.- - ----"- ..... -- '" .... ~~~ >-0) ~ HORIZON DUO IF CABLE LENGTH NOTES "i1~ s....~ I!;~ ~~ TO DETERMINE THE MAXIMUM CABLE LENGTH FOR A GNEN CABLE, THE FOLLOWING CALCULATION MUST BE PERFORMED AT . 1: "" ~~w BOTH THE TX IF FREQUENCY AND THE RX IF FREQUENCY, AND THE LOWEST OF THE TWO RESULTS USED AS THE MAXIMUM ~- ~ ;~~I LENGTH. S ~: i~Ii'" ~.. THE DRAGON WAVE HORIZON DUO IS AVAILABLE IN SEVERAL VARIANTS THAT HAVE DIFFERING REQUIREMENTS FOR s.... ~ G~ ~~{;ll'> MAXIMUM IF CABLE LOSS. THE IF CABLE LOSS SHOULD BE CALCULATED INCLUDING ALL IF CABLE LENGTHS, (TX IF ALLOWED LOSS - CONNECTOR LOSS)/ CABLE lOSS PER 100' "100' (ALL AT 700 MHz.) ::t~ ~~ ~ s: ~;:; ~,"-~j::: CONNECTORS, SURGE ARRESTORS AND JUMPERS. THE TABLE BELOW DETAilS THE 3 MAJOR HORIZON DUO VARIANTS (RX IF ALLOWED LOSS - CONNECTOR LOSS) / CABLE LOSS PER 100' " 100' {AlL AT 1900 MHZ.) ctS... ~ ~~"'~ AND THEIR MAXIMUM ALLOWED IF CABLE LOSS IN DB. NOTE THE PART NUMBER (PN) SHOWN ON THE LABEL CD Q) ;~ ?'~51i ~ ail DRAGONWAVE HAS DETERMINED THAT THE OWl SUPPLIED PATCH CABLES (ONE 6' AND ONE 15') 'PlUS TWO SURGE 0. '" >15~ _ .5 ~~r.i ARRESTORS CREATE UDB OF CONNECTORS LOSS@ 700 MHz, AND 2.0DB IF CONNECTORS LOSS@ 1900 MHz. ~~~ ALLOweD TX IF ALLOWED TX IF 0: *~~ HORIZON DUO TYPEILABEL CABLE LOSS CABLE LOSS THE EXAMPLE BELOW USES TIMES MICROWAVE LMR-600 CABLE, THE MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS INDICATE (-100 MHz) (-1900 MHz) THAT THIS CABLE HAS LOSSES OF 2.16 DB/100'@700MHzAND3.9DB/l00'@2000MHZ. (THE HIGHEST TEST POINT --"---------------------~--~ DATA IN THE EXAMPLES.) --r~~' SINGLE MODEM, SINGLE IF (NO INTERNAL COMBINER) THE SYSTEM WE'RE DOING TO CALCULATE CABLE LENGTH FOR IS A HORIZON DUO, DUAL MODEM, SINGLE IF. THIS VARIANT ;.j >,<000 . 000,;- OF THE HORIZON DUO CONTAINS AN INTERNAL COMBINER SO HAS DECREASED CABLE LOSS AllOWANCES COMPARED TO ~O.q.t.O )j) OTHER VARIANTS. i -5,<D<!> I HORIZON DUO IOU a: i.~~~ DragonWave (6.5DB - 1.108) /2.18"100 = 247 (FEET) I ~~~ PN: 60-000367.01 I I (13.5DB - 2.00B) / 3.19" 100 = 294 (FEET) Wi ~~.~ 10.0 DB 17.0 DB 247 FEET OR 75 METERS IS THE LOWEST RESULT, AND WILL BE THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED CABLE LENGTH FOR LMR-6oo. m to ot..x 00.\:0 MTH YR NOTE THAT HORIZON DUO UNITS IN DUAL MODEM, DUAL IF CONFIGURATION MAY USE AN EXTERNAL COMBINER, IN THIS CASE t-- <D fl. U. l,_ THE EXTERNAL COMBINER'S LOSS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE LOSS CALCULATIONS. www.dragonwavelnc.com MADE IN CANADA ~"(~ SERIAL NUMBER DW5Dxxxx, SYSTEM CAPACITY 1 ~ OUTER HORIZON DUO HORIZON DUO HORIZON DUO =Clr'-cr;= SINGLE MODEM, SINGLE IF (NO INTERNAL COMBINER) CABLE TYPE DIAMETER SINGLE MODEM, DUAL MODEM, DUAL MODEM, OF CABLE SINGLE IF SINGLE IF DUAL IF ......::.......- - .-.-. - ~ HORIZON DUO IOU DragonWave TIMES MICROWAVE 3/8" 250' OR 76M 142' OR 43M 250' OR 76M LMR-400 I PN; 60-000361.02 I I 6.5 DB 13.5 DB TIMES MICROWAVE 9/16" 385' OR 117M 223' OR 68M 385' OR 117M LMR-600 I MTH YR TIMES MICROWAVE 7/8" 510' OR 174M 328' OR 99M 570' OR 174M g ~ LMR-900 z ,. www.dragonwaveinc.com MADE IN CANADA iii ~ 1'<' ANDREW 5 !l. <x 7/16" 290' OR B8M 167' OR 51M 290' OR 88M <x 0 LU () u. SERIAL NUMBER DW5Exxxx. SYSTEM CAPACITY 2 LDF2-50A '" <II 0 W W o " ANDREW <II 5/8" 462' OR 141M 265' OR 81M 462' OR 141M !!J LDF4-50A SINGLE MODEM, SINGLE IF (NO INTERNAL COMBINER) ANDREW 7/8" 615' OR 1B7M 362' OR 110M 615' OR 1B7M LDF4.5-50A ))) HORIZON DUO IOU ANDREW 1 1/16" 806' OR 246M 471' OR 144M 806' OR 246M DragonWave LDF5-50A EUPEN -~ - .-- PN: 60-000361-03 I I 3/8" 235' OR 72M 135' OR41M 235' OR 72M o , 10.0 DB 17.0 DB EC1-50 --....- =-. ..... -- .... - EUPEN 7/16" 326' OR 99M 186' OR 56M 326' OR 99M MTH YR EC2-50 www.dragonwaveinc.com MADE IN CANADA EUPEN 1/Z' 462' OR 141M 265' OR 81 M 462' OR 141M MN-MSPOO80 EC4-50 SERIAL NUMBER DW5Fxxxx, SYSTEM CAPACITY 3 BELDEN 318" 212' OR 85M 116' OR 35M 212' OR 65M GOLDEN VALLEY - 9913 169 & MEDICINE CABLE OPTION DESCRIPTION LAKE RD. " MANUFACTURER:COMMSCCPE " PART NUMBER: 5731 2801 HILLSBOROAVE. N. RG6 " F CONNECTOR: THOMAS & BETTS # LRC-SNS-6 MICROWAVE CABLE DISTANCES " MAXIMUM CABLE lENGTH: 225 FEET WITH 2 IF LIGHTNING ARRESTOR NEW HOPE, MN 55427 3 MAXIMUM CABLE A TTENUA TION AS DISPLAYED ON REDlfNE GUI: 11 DB EQUIPMENT DISTANCE MANUFACTURER PART NUMBER " MANUFACTURER: BELDEN REDLlNE UP TO 300' BELDEN BELDEN 7919A CAT 5 REDLlNE UP TO 200' ANDREW FSJ1-751/4" SUPERFLEX 75 OHM DRAWN BY' 7919 CAT5 " PART NUMBER: 7919A " F CONNECTOR: CAT 5 SHIELDED CONNECTOR REDlINE 201' TO 300' ANDREW LDF4-75A 1/2" HELIAX 75 OHM CHECKED BY, DRAGONWAVE 0' TO 250' COMMSCOPE SFX500 DATo, 11 MANUFACTURER: BELDEN DRAGONWAVE 251 TO 350' COMMSCOPE FXL540 ,. PART NUMBER: 7731A DRAGONWAVE 351 TO 700' COMMSCOPE FXL780 PROJECT It RG-11 '" F CONNECTOR: FP-C71A BY CANARE '" MAXIMUM CABLE LENGTH: 400 FEET WITH 2 IF LIGHTNING ARRESTOR DRAGONWAVE OVER 700' COMMSCOPE CONTACT ENGINEERING SHoE! TIRE .. MAXIMUM CABLE A TTENUA TION AS DISPLAYED ON REOLlNE GUI: 12 DB MOTOROLA (ORTHOGON) UP TO 300' BELDEN BELDEN 7919A CAT 5 IF CABLE NOTES 'II MANUFACTURER: ANDREW CORP " PART NUMBER: LDF4-75 [----- HElIAX .. N CONNECTOR: L4NF-7550 (FEMALE) SHEoT NUMBER 11 MAXIMUM CABLE LENGTH: 750 FEET WITH 2 IF LIGHTNING ARRESTOR .. MAXIMUM CABLE ATTENUATION AS DISPLAYED ON REDLlNE GUI: 12 DB ANT .3 -. ._-~ ...... --...---.-... NOTES: 1. LEAN CONCRETE, RED-COLORED TOP, MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF COMPACTED SAND. 2. BURY CONDUITS 6" BELOW FROST LINE AT 42" BELOW GRADE FINISHED GRADE, OR GROUND COVER MATCH SLOPE AND THICKNESS OF EXISTING 3. CONDUIT SIZE, TYPE, QUANTITY AND SEPARATION DIMENSION TO BE VERIFIED WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS UNDISTURBED SOIL ----. CAUTIONARY TAPE ~I 'r -t CONDUITS FOR -......--- ELECTRICAL & ANTENNA SHARING WlHERE APPLICABLE 6" (MIN) -------- (TYP) ... COMPACTED SAND BED (SEE NOTE 1) - 4" MIN. TO SECONDARY ELECTRIC 12" MIN. TO PRIMARY ELECTRIC LliJJ_TI.kJIY..IB.~~.QtI DETAIL O'SCALE: N.T.S. GENERAL ~P.I::.gl.fICA TIONS 1. WIRING SHALL BEAWG STRANDED COPPER WITH THHN OR EQUIVALENT INSULATION. #12 MINIMUM INSTALLED IN 1/2" MINIMUM CONDUIT. SIGNAL WIRING SHALL BE INSULATED #22 AWG. NO BX OR ROMEX CABLE IS PERMITTED. CONDUITS SHALL BE SURFACE MOUNTED. 2. WIRING DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ULlISTED SPECIFICATIONS GRADE. 3. MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW AND CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED FOR EACH ITEM BY THE ORGANIZATIONS LISTED BELOW. -AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TESTING MATERIALS (ASTM) -UNDERWRITER'S LABORATORY (UL) -NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION (NEMA) -AMERICAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (ASA) -NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) 4. INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH REGULATIONS OF: -THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NFPA 70) -THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL SAFETY CODE (ANSI C-2) -THE LIFE SAFETY CODE (NFPA 101) -LOCAL BUILDING CODES 5. THE ENTIRE SYSTEM SHALL BE SOLIDLY GROUNDED USING LOCKNUTS AND BONDING NUTS ON CONDUITS AND PROPERLY BONDED GROUND CONDUCTOR. RECEPTACLES AND EQUIPMENT BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL BE GROUNDED WITH A FULL-SIZED EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR RUN IN THE CIRCUITS CONDUIT. 6. OUTLET AND JUNCTION BOXES SHALL BE ZINC-COATED OR CADIUM PLATED STEEL NOT LESS THAN 4" SQUARE AND SUITABLE FOR THE TYPE SERVICE AND OUTLET. OUTLET AND JUNCTION BOXES SHALL BE SURFACE MOUNTED AND LABELED WITH BRANCH CIRCUIT BREAKER NUMBER. 7. LABEL ALL EQUIPMENT SERVED FROM CLEARWlRE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PANELBOARD WITH PHENOLIC LABELS SIZED IN RELATION TO USAGE. 8. INDOOR CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN EMT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. OUTDOOR CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WlHERE EMT IS USED. IT SHALL BE WITH ONLY LISTED COMPRESSION FITTINGS. NO SET SCREW FITTINGS SHALL BE ALLOWED. 9. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL ENGRAVED LABEL ON THE CLEARWIRE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. METER SOCKET ENCLOSURE. THIS SITE PLAN WAS CREATED OFF OF FIELD MEASUREMENTS BY THE DESIGNER. AS BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS NOT SUPPLIED FOR PURPOSES OF SITE LAYOUT & UTILITY ROUTING. NOTE: CONTRACTOR IS TO FOLLOW EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS THE PROPOSED UTILITIES. ~ PROPOSED 1-112" 0 UNDERGROUND CONDUIT WITH (3) # 1 & #6 GROUND CONDUCTOR FOR ELEC. SERVICE FROM PROPOSED METERI DISC. TO PROPOSED CABINET (145:1: LF.)_._... '" " . a ~ I ~~.""'.L.._J o r z ~ ~"'."""""""-'-""'J SCALE IS FOIll1x17 MeDIA (USE HALF SCALE FOIl2Ax36 MeDIA) _.~--_._----,..__._-----_._.. .. I .. I .. I .. l "".. EXISTING ENCLOSED FENCE EQUIPMENT COMPOUND ~ " EXISTING WATER TANK TOWER ~ PROPOSED UTILITY H-FRAME WITH 100 A, 120/208V SINGLE PHASE METER ~..... ~ PROPOSED 8' WIDE ......-- UTILITY ROUTE -..----..++------- ~ I (""""-'-"1 I o 7.5' 15' 30' ~..__...................j SCAlE IS FOR 11.17 MEOlA (Use HAI.F SCAlE FOR _ MEOlA) -.---.-.---....-----..'----- PROPOSED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE FROM EXISTING TRANSFORMER ON EXISTING UTILITY POLE TO PROPOSED UTILITY H-FRAME AND EQUIPMENT. ROUTE IS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH LOCAL POWER COMPANY. ------------------------------------------------------------, r-r-c-c-rJ--c--'-c-r-c-r-c_c_r_r_c_c_c_Cx=.~.~+..)(.. --------------____L__________~~~~~---~~ ~~ ~---~---~~~____~___~_______~~ .-'L_._.*..__*- )( )( ..............~ r~:~~~~CL.EARWiRE. TX:J EXISTING UTILITY POLE WITH TRANSFORMER ~///////;;7~P/7m7)0Tm7m77m_~P/7)/W77;W77~7/77///47P/7;;7WP;W7~j ~ ~~~ip~E~~~~~R~::l PROPOSED H-FRAME :...-J EXISTING BUILDING /' L=~.-:J UTlk.IJY ROUTING ....E.L..AN ~ -']SCALE: 1"= 30'-a' )( K...... .x......... )( )( )( ...........-. )( )( -..---x...... ._~.~.._.._..~...~ L.___.._. {..-.............-.....-.....-:J PROPOSED CLEARWIRE Tx7' .. LEASE AREA --.<..---------.-----------...---------- =.f.~~';i~REl ON A PROPOSED H-FRAME ..._____________...__.w__ ['--"'-.-"-' EXISTING T-MOBllE EQUIPMENT _~~TFo:_J /EXISTING NEXTEL / EQUIPMENT / SHELTER // / / / / / / / / / / E::::r TANK TOWER C-C-I:_C-(C_.....- --......-...............-...............-..........t PROPOSED 1-112" 0 UNDERGROUND CONDUIT WITH (3) # 1 & #6 GROUND ~~~f~if~;I~i~~~~.:~~~~:.~~~~.. '.'Q~..~IlbIIY RQ~I!~.G_..P1t\.M ~~ SCALE: 1"'" 10'-0" -C-:II__:II_ ----r-c ~ ~(l) i s...~ . C l!l ~'- .. .s ~~ "'" :>. "'. '- to ~~ CO ~ ~~ t'I, Q) ;:: \1.1'5.'" _ .5 0: I!l Z ~1Il1!! l'l~~ lfd 'l'iiw ~~;:!!I ;C:o(.;:')i ~ni'J il~61!l r:~:Sg ~~~;> ;~~i ~i!i~ ~~~ ~~g ~i'J~ (ft a:1 11 ~~~ .._~._--.. >,:200 OOO"l' "O"l'lO {5.'or ( '-;::llX)g; I .0> lO <1> <l>lO" (f) 0"-..." ~:t2'::t'>/' mll:OC)OCl .:< .. O\,.,..X o OJ: 0 <00.0..1.... WI~I~ 1-- 'l"'" ~. <( """ 't"- Cl ~ M 5 ~ ,~ ~ (/) Yl I- 5 ~ ~ ~ ijj .. '" Q. ~ ~ 12 ~ 0:: if> 0 W ~ ~ ffi ~ :; W if> ~ '" ~ I ,I <' MN-MSP0080 iGOLDEN VALLEY 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILlSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 ORAW'iBY JLRIt.S CHECKED BY OM DArr: 12111109 PROJECT #: 43281 ...._--_.._.................~ SHEET'l1TtE UTILITY ROUTING PLAN ..._..----_...._-+---_.._~~.._._--_......----_..._. SHEET NUMBER E-1 LEGENQ;. . EXOTHERMIC WELD (CADWELD) (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) ___ NEW INTERCONNECT __------------- ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE .- ANTENNA GROUND, USE SINGLE HOLE LUG PROPOSED BOTTOM BUSS BAR ATTACHED TO GROUND RING, PROPOSED TOP BUSS BAR CONNECTED TO BOTTOM BUSS BAR WITH A HOME RUN LEAD / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXIST, TOWER ~~ / GROUND RING ! I I '" I ",'" I ",'" .-'" I I I EXISTING "--;Z'---~/ WATER TAN I TOWER ! ~ I / 0- .......--.-.-. ..... I /'" .___.._.._m..'__ " ~____Z___.......__. I .._ ~-'--_.P-- -_..........- GROUNDING WIRE -- NEW 6"x2"x1/4" TINNED ANTENNA ~ GROUND BAR ATTACHED f/ DIRECTLY TO TOWER ------~ - EXOTHERMIC WELD . ~~~~gnoN UL TRAWELD __- HIGH PRESS "C" TAP -- ------ TIE TO SUITABLE GROUND, -RUN NEW #2 AWG GROUND WIRE TO TOWER BASE GROUND BAR _------ NEW GROUND KIT ANDREW _--- MODEL # UGBKIT-021 0 AT TOWER TIE INTO NEW TOWER BASE GROUND BAR NEW CABINET N H . ~ ,... I r;J- L.___..___J Q .5 l' 2' SCALE IS FOR 11xf7MEOIA (USE HAlF SCALE FOR 24x3Il MEOlA) -, (Q$)) GROUND TEST WELL -.;;... .,.-, ( .) ~"X 10' COPPER CLAD STEEL GROUND '-'" m__. 6" AWG STRANDED GROUND WIRE c::::::J GROUND BAR GROUNDING PLAN AT WATER TANK .-...--.....-. ..--....... -_..------.. SCALE: 1"= 2'-0" ~ NEW PLATED GROUND BAR ~ #2 AWG SOLID TINNED /' GROUND WIRE ...--.- #2 AWG SOLID TINNED GROUND WIRE FROM CABINET GROUND BAR TO BCW GROUND RING -~.. -----*----*---.-)(-.-*-----*----*-'-;><----7(,-----:><-----)(----7(-...-;><-..*..- ---..- #2 GND.TO GROUND RING FOR H-FRAME TYP. OF 2 GROUND TEST WELL SITE GROUNDING DIAGRAM SCALE: N_T.S_ -'---------- /"- --\~-fJ------- ./-' /~' I _-.-- -- ,+,-'----- I - \ ~ -'" _____L I ' 1 -....- GROUND I' ' TVP. ROD,-\ I ~ ' l!~ #6 GND. FOR ~' / _ X GPS ANTENNA I // I ( , ~ I I f'.:' - I ~ ' ' I , ,/ , I I , " I , ' \ . r' ~. \+,\ , ,'/ , ->- ' , -1-_ , - GROUND lEAD TO I 0 /_ ~BINET, .4' 'NSlDE #2 GND. lEA \ ,0 / "OT NNECllDN BY , CABINET GR 0 FOR '-1_~-t \ I " HERS DUN"''''' "I I ' I -- #2AWG '__.- ,.-, ,I I TINNED --.....C_--''J ' BCWGROUND RING _"J / -------,,/ //// EXISTING GRAVEL <:> 1 0"x42"GROUND TEST WELL WI HDPE COVER. HARGER MODEL # 3609942 MASTER GROUND BAR INSIDE TELCO ENCLOSURE _ J:.ROST L1!:-1L <0 [ ..-.....----.....-.----.--.-.------.] . i~~~~~~~~;~~~_.~____ -Hf.:lt u_____________.__._ EXOTHERMIC ~::~I= WELD :=_.11 :::Ul~ --.-.--- DRIVEN COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD -:~lff :~;:---- (518"0 X 8'-0" LONG) HARGER MODEL # 588 1-::: 11'-'-- CD. TESI--"l~l~1J~.J2_I;IA'_~ r:::.~-SCAlE: NTS ~OTE:-------------....-.--.-----...-----...-.--------------.....-.--, SE"fTEST WELL COVER 1" BELOW TOP OF GRAVEL LEASE AREA ....____.____.............__.._______h............._................ (2) #2 GND. LEAD FOR GROUND BAR (:4.U._~BQU~_QJtI.~__P.bA~._AI_!;_Q_lJtEM~.~Il:~\gE.;.8. \. '7 SCALE: 1"= 2'-0" ~Q) i ~1Il~ E /:: - ~~i '- .e I!:~~ . c: w :;:; 3: .- N M5~1 o ,,~ ;;~j .... >-z ;~ w )0, ~'" 'g"d ~ . ~ '- (11 ,,~ ~~I~ CO ~ ~r ~~ ~ i ~ \< f5~ (]) - In ~ El~ 0. _)1" (.) .m II! 111 ~ ~ ~! '1.1 ~I ~'{() . [-----.....! '" ~ ~ r---r-T--'- 1-- .... i3 "( ..- '<"w C1 ~ (;2;, i-~___._h_h...... >-.i:500 000-4- ;:0-4-<<) .cl.O<<) I Q'I..J I (l) 'i-(l)0l .01 <<) ~ g,~;:: ~:2';: ... 1llCl:(l)(l) ::.r. .. o \-.. X o OJ: 0 lOa.a. iJ.. is ~ '-' (fJ ;i] '3 ... z z '> Z 0 o UJ UJ (j) ~ a: :! 5> ~ ~ f5 w '-' CJ <r '" Cl UJ tU UJ cr. o :) UI 3l .. -- Cl UJ '" G; '" o z MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 DRAIM'l BY CHECKED BY DATE, PROJECT #, SHEET TITLE SITE GROUNDING DIAGRAM! PLAN SHEET NUMBE.R E-2 Siemens load Center W0816ML 1125 125 Amp, 8 Spaces 1 Phase, 3 WIre 120/240 VAC NOTE: Lights of America Model 7000 plugs into one outlet. The other three outlets are for service personnel only. Receptacle, Duplex Outlet 120 VAC:..~_~mps ._--J........ Safety Ground ~ lJl ~ o co C) I . ""~- Q;) r" Neutral @l'-~~_. ... ---' ,-. . ! ~- "'N~ III <II :> c: c: <Il ::J::JZ ~Q) Q) s....E .m -3: .5 ~ o ...~ .... '>-2: iP s... ~ h I'I"C ~ g::; \rU It.. ~g Q)Q) ~ 0. '" _E t) ': ~1lJ~ ~g~ [~i ~;~bl _.,...\Ii ~~~~ ~~I"~ ~~ 11 5~'~ ~~~!J ~'l!!i1~ 'z":';:;I ~wg ~~~ ~ ~ :iJ (1). All wiring 12 GA unless specified otherwise, except service entrance (2). Light of America IS 18" Florescent Light - Attached to inside roof (3). A230 ABD 02100 held in place by retainer clip. ~ci co ~ >,t.Ooo . 0000 <t . ;: 'It t.O II .c: t.O<(} 1 It .<:1'..J},lXl a:e I-.m~ <Ill\l<O" gj.g;::r--- ~ J'- 'It' 'It' W::J [lJCt::COlXl " .. I Oi....x L.. 00'<:0 r-- to (L (L u. ~~~ ~~.... ....--. ---'-'" .--.......... ~.~ " .~....~_...- _..\~......... 10GA f ~ NEMA, L 14-20L r;;1 Single Locking, 3 Pole 4 wire ____ ,O~ e- _'''I250V30Am, ~~=~:1_J -----..---~tJ -............€...t 8......... NEMA, L 14-20R 1 Single Locking, 3 Pole 4 wire 125/250V 20 Amp __"_~..__~_____..._.__.___...______.....________.______...i._______4-___ _...... 1 0 G~..........I...--..._.i-........ Wired directly to AC Unit in a 4 square Junction Box -Ice Cube, Model No,: 1Q400VS, 4,000 BTUs, 220 VAC, 4.7 Amps ......--......1.0 GA .........-.. .........-..... "'.. -Alternate, Ice Cube Model No,: 1 Q600VS, 6,000 BTUs, 220 VAC, 5.8 Amps I........ ........ -Alternate, Kooltronics, Model No.: K2A4C4RP22RF, 4,000 BTUs, 220 VAC, 5.8 Amps I L___...._~.._-_ ............__f!l.!1.Q!:l!l!C?~l,l.r~___......... ._ Part Number Oeser! tlon __.......~p.p~y.!I.llI..__ Siemens Electrical Distribution W0816ML 1125 Load Center Nama 3R UL File E10703 Siemens Electrlcal Dlstribulion 'Q12irQ2100~Q23fi;'Q2202ij-" ..cfiCiiifsrea"ker.........................._............ TIt. File E82615......--_... SIemens Electrical DIstribution QML12--........--..-......---....--- "lVlecliiiiiiCiif[iiCHjiifBiir'"-''-'''-'''-''' "UL File E10703-........_.... Pass Seymour . Tf,j:.2OR................................_.. .Siiiijiii.Recep.20AMPTwist'Lock-....... UL 4~'--''''''''''-'''' Siemens Electrical Distribution" fi!7iC-....-.-....................- .BaCkFooiflVliifii.BriiiikerEiuss.-...... UL File E10r03.........._.... Levitron lco~ted _.__._.: ]:rjIfj~Iril~C~=..=:=~::. 31tiiiigJ:2..'QY~~~.P]~iiiiQctor UL File E1~i~~~~.:=~: E_.-1~..bQ8_QJ~.!;NTE..R WlBJ~G -7 SCALE: N.T.S ~ Type GT THROUGH CABLE TO TOP OF GROUND ROD. ~ Type VN HORIZONTAL CABLE TAP TO VERTICAL STEEL SURFACE OR THE SIDE OF HORIZONTAL PIPE ~ Type HS HORIZONTAL CABLE TAP TO HORIZONTAL STEEL SURFACE OR PIPE. CABLE OFF SURFACE. -go ~~ Type GY . THROUGH CABLE TO SIDE OF GROUND ROD ~ Type NC THROUGH AND TAP CABLES TO GROUND ROD THROUGH VERTICAL CABLE TO VERTICAL STEEL SURFACE OR TO THE SIDE OF EITHER HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL PIPE C1~..!;~_QII:::l.I;..8.MtQ...'lY.~_bP DET AJ.b.~._ C7 SCAlE: N.T.S. ~ Type GR CABLE TAP TO TOP OF GROUND ROD ~ CD Type QP. 100 Amp. 2 POLE, 120/240 VAC @ @ @ @ '" z o iii ~ a: in z :;; g ~ ~ ~ rz fil o '" !il Type QP, 30 Amp, 2 POLE, 120/240 VAC Type OP, 20 Amp, Twin POLE, 120/240 VAC Type QP, 20 Amp, 1 POLE, 120/240 VAC Mechanical Interlock, Siemens Part No. QML 12, used to lock 1 for back feeding electrical service o z MN-MSP0080 ~ Type TA TEE OF HORIZONTAL RUN AND TAP CABLES. GOLDEN VALLEY - 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBOROAVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 ~ Type XB CROSS OF HORIZONTAL CABLES. LAPPED AND NOT CUT DRAWN BY. JLR CIiECKED BY; OM DATE; 12111!lJ9 PROJECT /I: 432131 S~IEET TIllE CENTER DIAGRAM & DETAILS r-.-..-....-.......-.---J. SHEET NUMBER E-3 --.......-.--......--.......... Type VS CABLE TAP DOWN AT 45" TO VERTICAL STEEL SURFACE OR SIDE OF HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL PIPE. NOTES: 1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER. WATER. GAS. ELECTRIC. AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK. SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES. AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) TRENCHING & EXCAVATION. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 4. IF NECESSARY. RUBBISH. STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS. STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 5. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER. WATER. GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED ANDIOR CAPPED. PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR, OWNER AND/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. 6. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE. 7. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. 8. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS. SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 9. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. ANY SETTLING OR SINKING FROM POOR COMPACTION WILL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 10. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER, EQUIPMENT OR DRIVEWAY, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED IN THE PROJECT SPECIACATIONS. 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHAll BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROl. SITE"W.QB!S.~ENERAL NOTE~_: NOTES: 1, ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A36 UNLESS OTHER'MSE NOTED. 2. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70XX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AISC. WHERE ALLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN. PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC "MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION". PAINTED SURFACES SHALL BE TOUCHED UP. 3. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A325 BEARING TYPE (3/4"0) CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5/B" DIA. ASTM A 307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSIONIWEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES. SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. ~IB.~.gTURAL STEEl.:. NqIg~:_ CONCREI!;..t\J~tD REINFORCING. ST!;gb..N.QI!;.~.:. 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301. AC1318, ACI336, ASTM A184, ASTM A185 AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE. 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SLAB FOUNDATION DESIGN ASSUMING ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 2000 PSF. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 60. DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL BE CLASS "B" AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD, UNO. 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH........3IN. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: #6 AND LARGER ..........................2 IN. #5 AND SMALLER & WNF.........1 1/2 IN. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: SLAB AND WALL........................3/4IN. BEAMS AND COLUMNS............1 1/2 IN. 5. A CHAMFER 3/4" SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE, UNO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4. GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION"6AAWiNG~ TH-EFOLLOWlNG DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: CONTRACTOR - OWNERS CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CONSTRUCTION) OWNER - CLEARWlRE OEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURE 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS. THE 8l0DUllG SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ANY DlSCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF CONTRACTOR. 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES. REGULATIONS, AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES. ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 4. DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO SCALE AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY. 5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS. EQUIPMENT. APPURTENANCES. AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. . 6. "KITTING LIST" SUPPLIED WITH THE BID PACKAGE IDENTIFIES ITEMS THAT WILL BE SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR. ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE BILL OF MATERIALS AND KIITING LIST SHAll BE SUPPLIED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR. 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 8. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CONTRACTOR. 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT. POWER AND T1 CABLES. GROUNDING CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWING. 10. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHAll PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS. LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL lEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION. 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION. ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLS _._-~._.----_..._-_. I SIC I SOLID GROUND BUS BAR I SIN I SOLID NEUTRAL BUS BAR =,J:l~~"J;t,=> SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND CONDUCTOR on. 2-POLE THERMAL-MAGNETIC ^ CIRCUIT BREAKER o 0 __ SINGLE-POLE THERMAL-MAGNETIC o 0 CIRCUIT BREAKER AGl BTS (E) MIN N.T.S. REF RF T.B.O. T.B.R. TYP REQ EGR AWG MGB EG BCW SIAD GEN IGR RBS ABOVE GRADE LEVEL BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION EXISTING MINIMUM NOT TO SCALE REFERENCE RADIO FREQUENCY TO BE DETERMINED TO BE RESOLVED TYPICAL REQUIRED EQUIPMENT GROUND RING AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE MASTER GROUND BUS EQUIPMENT GROUND BARE COPPER WIRE SMART INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICE GENERATOR INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) RADIO BASE STATION @ [!] [:!l OJ DISCONNECT SWITCH METER EXOTHERMIC WELD (CADWElD) (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 5/8" x 10' COPPER CLAD STEEL GROUND ROD 5/8" x 10' COPPER CLAD STEEL GROUND ROD WITH INSPECTION SLEEVE EXOTHERMIC WELD (CADWELD) WITH INSPECTION SLEEVE GROUNDING WIRE ~ . i'!" '\ Q) 'U E s.... Cl) . .... c: '0 3=,- N o r--~ ... >-z ~" s.... ~ 15~ ~ x::; ctJ... ~cl Cl) .. Q)a. l;; _E U ': ~lli~ ,- Ii ~~~ lE~1i' <j!0i," ;a~;:~ ~"''''.'i ~~i;j ~>!&1~ ~~~~ ~~l')~ ~~~~ t:ib I!~ ~ ~ - (B =1 ml ~~~ V4Y ........-.-.. vJ.............:~-;.::::.::_._........... ,----,,-: il! ~ 5 IX) ~ ",lOOo 000 " JOg;:; \0 ~..J I ch }....oo 0) .. .(II\O 'lJ<l.l'l)'-..... ~.~~':;; ~!r;;; (0 "" .. o L.. X o Q.C 0 tOQO.lL <Il 15 u; ~ 0: ~ ~ ~ 2 fl ~ fiJ o ;:) m !!l -+-u"tt.- "j-f- l..........lL~L. ..'" .._ ... ...J..... MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY - 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE. MN 55427 [......--.....---..l DRAWN BY, JLR _....._---_..__.~---_......_---_._. CH~CKEO BY OM ....;;;;;-....._...__._.~;.;;;;~..... . -----_._.._--------_.--~...._--_.~..- PROJECT It. 43281 _..---_.~~_.-._-~..._--_._---~ [.-.....-.........-...........-] SHEET TITLE CONSTRUCTION NOTES ----_......_-_..._----~.._--- ~..-...sHEEr NUMBeR".....-.....] SP-1 ~._._.-_._--_._---~._-_.. ~; '" !)j) .:::: .~ ~i 61 '.;::1 gl "'I .:::, 01 Ui .---1 ";Ii .... .E!: 0' EI rill a 1'1' '~I e!1 01 61 001 ~ ~I <1>1 ~i <1>1 1'1, 'ui :Si 0)' ""'I ""'I ~: 0\' 101 -I ~ ~I '. ~ !;j~ ~~I .. 0\1 0\ 01 I (J;! 0\ 131 0....., ~~Il 00\ ~9 ~! GENERAL . DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CODES: 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE . DESIGN LOADS: WIND LOAD (ASCE 7-05) BASIC WIND SPEED (3 SEC. GUST) = 90 MPH WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR: I = 1.0 WIND EXPOSURE: B WIND GUST FACTOR: G = 0.85 NET FORCE COEFFICIENT: Cf = 1.85 WIND DIRECT/ONALlTY FACTOR: Kd = 1.85 VELOCITY PRESSURE EXPOSURE COEFFICIENT: Kz = 0.89 TOPOGRAPHIC FACTOR: Kzt = 1.0 VELOCITY PRESSURE: qz = 15.7 PSF ANTENNA & MOUNT WEIGHT = 200LB (INCLUDES %"0 RADIAL ICE) - CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXISTING BUILDING UTILITIES, STREETS, EQUIPMENT ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE TEMPORARY PROTECTION AS REQUIRED. . FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO FABRICATION. . ANY HOLES CUT IN THE EXISTING OR NEW STRUCTURE WHICH ARE NOT DETAILED ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE REVIEWED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITH THE ENGINEER. . CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND FASTENING REQUIREMENTS WITH MANUFACTURER. - STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCALED FOR DIMENSIONS, COORDINATE WITH THE ! ENGINEER IF DIMENSIONS ARE NOT CLEAR. I . ALL ANGLE ADAPTORS MUST CONTAIN A NEOPRENE OR RUBBER PROTECTOR WITH METAL SHIM ~ BENEATH THE CLAMP TO PROTECT THE COATING AND PREVENT MOISTURE TO THE STRUCTURAL "=!! STEEL. STRUCTURAL STEEL AND MISCELLANEOUS METALS . ALL STRUCTURAL TUBING TO BE A500, GRADE B. . ALL OTHER STRUCTURAJ STEEL SHAPES TO BE ASTM A36 - ALL WELDING ELECTRODES SHALL BE E70XX. . FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS IS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AISC CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE. - ALL WELDING TO BE PERFORMED BY QUALIFIED WELDERS AND SHALL CONFORM TO A.W.S. D1.1. . ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL AND MISCELLANEOUS METALS EXPOSED TO EXTERIOR CONDITIONS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. TOUCH UP ALL DISTURBED AREAS. WELDING . ALL WELDING SHALL BE BY A CERTIFIED WELDER. . ALL WELDING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE AWS STRUCTURAL WELDING CODES, INCLUDING ANSI/AWWA 0100-96 "AWWA STANDARD FOR WELDED STEEL TANKS FOR WATER STORAGE" AS MODIFIED TO DATE. - MAKE ALL WELDS TO THE TANK WALL WITH E7018 LOW HYDROGEN ROD. WELD SMOOTH AND AVOID UNDERCUTS AND BURRS. GRIND SMOOTH ALL WELDS SO THAT NO SHARP PROTRUSIONS REMAIN. SMOOTH IS DEFINED AS NO CUTS OR ABRASIONS OCCUR WHEN RUBBING YOUR HAND OVER THE WELD. . DO NOT WELD WHEN THE AMBIENT TEMPERATURE IS BELOW 320F UNLESS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AWWA D100, SEC. 10.2.1 ARE FOLLOWED. . BEFORE WELDING, REMOVE ALL COATINGS WITHIN 6" OF THE AREA TO BE WELDED. PREPARE EXISTING STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SURFACES WHERE WELDING IS TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SSPC-SP-10 WHITE METAL BLAST CLEANING CODE. . DO NOT WELD GALVANIZED COMPONENTS DIRECTLY TO THE TANK SURFACE. GRIND GALVANIZED SURFACES FREE OF GALVANIZING PRIOR TO WELDING. PREPARE EXISTING STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SURFACES WHERE WELDING IS TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS CODE. . COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE AWWA D-100, AWS 01.1, ANSI, ASTM STANDARDS, ACI, AISC AND FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES DURING CONSTRUCTION DESIGN AND FABRICATION. PAINTING - SEE TERRA CONSULTING GROUP GENERAL NOTES SUBMITTALS - STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS, INCLUDING CONNECTIONS, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE STRUCTURAL STEEL PRIOR TO FABRICATION. DETAIL 2A FULL PEN EXISTING EXTERIOR SURFACE z ZOCf) O-W i=!:i:...J <COO C:::Z~::;j 1-::>Cf)W wocaco ffiu.OW Il.Wa:::CI) w6<ciii ~Lt.'I~w U4:00 0'0(;5 ...Jll-~ PROVIDE BOOT AT END OF INNERDUCT CONDUIT. \\ \\ EXISTING FOUNDATION \ \ \\- TYP. @ OUT PAN i . -_.._...._......~...........1.' i\ i (2) 2)2"0 SCH. 80 PIPE BilL (TYP.) DETAIL 2A NOTE: WATER CAPACITY OF TANK SHOULD BE REDUCED TO 50% OR MORE PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE STIFFENERS. SHAFT/BELL WALL PENETRATIONS ARE TO BE PERFORMED AFTER STIFFENERS ARE IN PLACE. REQUIRED INSTALLATION SEQUENCE: REDUCED TANK CAPACITY 50% CUT HOLE ONE WELD IN PIPE NECK CUT SECOND HOLE WELD IN PIPE NECK. CABLE PENETRATION AT BASE N.T.S. INTERIOR VALLEY FACE OF FLUTED COLUMN INTERIOR RIDGE FACE OF FLUTED COLUMN ANGLE ADAPTER It :','; _';;;~:./.... ,.' _,,,' \ -1---(2) 2" INNERDUCT CONDUIT EXISTING INTERIOR LATERAL STIFFENER WALL MOUNT INNERDUCT VERTICAL SUPPORT BRACKET N.T.S. ANGLE ADAPTER V ~ ANDREW HORIZONTAL Z-BRACKET 1/ CABLE SUPPORT @ 2'-O"OC ,.,...,.,...1 ~. LP---SNAP-IN HANGER AT EA HORIZONTAL CABLE RUN @ INTERIOR FACE (E) MID-HEIGHT TANK LEG STIFFENER HORIZONTAL CABLE SUPPORT DETAIL N.T.S. il< .... 'Q)1Il '-~ . .... >.~ J ::>... >-1 '- ~ b CO .. I~ (1)! t; _E U ': r--" , , ! , , I i , w>!Jl 1-""' i51~ I :: I (Jl Ii :;: . Z 'z !lJ ., 0 6i , ~ I!!;: 0: ~ II!~ ~ ~ 'w fiI o :J 11l ~!:2 :j SITE MN-MSP0080 GOLDEN VALLEY - 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE. MN 55427 DRAWN BY: RLB CHECKED BY: 8MB DATE: 12/09109 PROJECT#: 43-281 SHEc,TITLE General Notes Details I .1 " " SHEET NUMBER 51 i 1 ~ ~, 'T.:/' - 1Zl, ~ .511 ~ 01 .,8; 0' E1 ""I 51 WI ..-' e; ;a/ 0' EI lZli --, "", bll 1':1 '~i ~i 61 001 g '1 ~I "01 ~I ..lo:: <'IS ~l 11)' '~I ~i ::EI <I<l, 0,1 ~j ~ 'I ~' 11)1 H 0,1 ij ~I ~~! 6\ gJ , <iiI 0, ..c, g .Q: N=i 0\ 1i 00,1 ~~ A >-i EXTERIOR VALLEY FACE OF HYDROPILLAR EXTERIOR RIDGE FACE OF HYDROPILLAR 3"0 MOUNTING PIPE (SCH. 40) x 6'.0" (1) VALMONT ONE PIECE 4" INTEGRAL BOOT (B535A) AT EACH PENETRATION P 4"0 PENETRATION IN TANK WALL FOR EACH COAX PENETRATION, REINF W/3-1/2"0 SCH. 80 PIPE X 5"L ~ W6X25, TYP TYP. EXTERIOR ANTENNA SUPPORT ELEVATION SCALE: N.T.S. INTERIOR VALLEY FACE OF HYDROPILLAR BEYOND INTERIOR STIFFENER BEAM TANK WALL PENETRATION SCALE: N.T.S. " ... ~Q.) ~ s-Gi · :E ~ >o...:fl >;i!li s.... ~ ;f CO .. I~ Q)!t;; _E c..)~ ...~ I ~II ,I J~5 Illf~ ~~~ ".4- " i' ! i , " t/) z 0 1ii ~ i r:r: 'SITE MN-MSP0080: GOLDEN VALLEY - 169 & MEDICINE i LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 DRAWN av: RLa CHECKED av: 5MB DATE: 12109109 PROJECT II: 43-261 SHEET TITlE Details SHEET NUMaEfl 52 LEGEND GUY ANCHOR SIGN SINGLE POST '0_, ELEC POLE >----- -9-- ELEC METER {'lJ TELE PEDESTAL @ SANITARY MANHOLE [J STORM CATCH BASIN r>r WATER VALVE ~ WATER HYDRANT rnril--rm ' EDGE OF WOODS -o---<}<.-o-o--o-- FENCE CHAIN LINK l: -;'21 CONCRETE SURFACE _.- OHE---.-- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC lear '.' ~ I '" CD ~ .._n___ ~ 0 1; :z ~ >- <( ;; ~ ~ :J: I (9 :J: .n :;; L- of the 5W 1/. Southwest e~:;;:r 118. Rng. 21 of see. 19. -'':<~i!'f~T~;=''-<''~<'F~VC'_-EXl~I~~'';J-'''- :~--- __WAIJ,.____ h'.__.__.__. ,-' ~Ow~T I i ~:;:_:_.c.-;'~.~ ~~~~...., !iI BRICl<RErAlNlNG-x/71--' --r'" ~ ROCK J WAll 0'/ ' .: -""-" "'- lANOSCAf'1NG ,/, [) "-",, /;:/ .' ~~ /::/ ~- ~ ) ~,~ . ", ' ~- /j/ DRAIN""'" \ C\ ' , // if ~ SITE SURVEY 1 'II' cfi>--o- ~-<>-rl)-- -0--0- --<>,.16h:u:: ~~=OlHl:>-;:!O - 8!lf. . - ~---. Q!I5--=O+- _ .------ Ol-l.. .LU;, ~." --.----=~~-.:----~ .- ;-<:.:-:::----- ---L.-~~~~Z-~~-~'--ti::~---- ---------- -:~-~+_=~---==~------- - ~~-:~--~~:~~.. " --" - '" ~,"G smEE~f"~"~ ... ~... . .. ~m" I /,/'/I~ "..-/?<',NO or'I",/"/~!'/"U'/".."//n,//,,h';I"'//I'/;h'//.;/"h/I''''''',O'''',,'-'/".,,""~;/ '//11h'~h'''h'''''''~ " " , , , , ~ I ~ / ElaSnNG GARAGCS ~ ~-1 E~ I i (~; ~-1 ~r ::) -1 I ' . 03060 Iiz_______ ' -------------=.J SCALE ( IN FEET ) OfUEHrAllON OFlH1S BEARING SySTEM IS eASED ONTHt!HSHNEPIN COUNTY COORDlNAlESYSTEM NAo&S{~66) . = DENOTES A. FOUNa IRON MONlJMENT @" OENOTES A FOUND SECTlON CORNER MONUMENT SITE #: MN-MSP0080 SITE NAME: GOLDEN VALLEY 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. t------ Northwest eorner or the SW 1/4 of See. 19. Twp. 118, Rng. 21 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HQPE. MN 55427 No. Dete REVISIONS EXiSTING SPRiNT EaUIPMENT PLATFORM ! , , --~---~._.~. - ---...-----.-.- ...:,,--------.--- -.. \ ---------\ ~. , BiTllMfNOOS ------1____ , , , , , , ~ $' o 10 20 l.~, '. I I ./ '>Ii> J ..-<>._o_-{)--.o---o---~"'-<>-~-~::;::.:,;:;,..-.o---o---o--o--o---'r-<;>--o----o----o---'o--o--o--o----0_.-0- ~ {'lJ ~ SCALE ( IN FEET ) DETAIL ,-. J.") 6Q , , !'~1 I I --. : , .... ~ o ll:l j :f , \ I ~ z i 'w l ~ 'IE ---,---iLjOHE ,-,____.~ : ~ ~ EXI$l1NG GARAGES so ~-- South line of the $W 1/4 ----jL Soulh.us\ COf"'" of the SW '/4' --...1 of Sue. 19, Twp. 118, Rnq. 21 " By CHI< IAPP'D I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMEti,I,1VAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER~Ol :r~RVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSE RVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE Sl: NESOTA # SIGNATURE, ~\,; BRYAN r. BALCOME;-CS:--- DATE: 1g9709 LICENSE # 42594 @ :won W10SETHSMlTH NOL itNG . FULL SCAlE ON 2~. MEDIA HAlF SCALe ON 11-x17" MeDIA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS LAND SURVEYORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AU:::lWOORfA,MN BaWJ), tnl SAAlNf!mI.l.lN C~.MN GM.1l) fOAK1. NO REOWIHG. !.W -". SiOUltF,w.$,$O 0494A0123.000 BASE ELEVATION TOP RAIL ELEVATION TOP TOWER ELEVATION TALLEST APPURT. ELEV lear EXISTING WATER TOWER - ANTENNA INVENTORY EXHIBIT S R CJ <::1 937.9 = 1083.8 = 1082.0 = 1099.9 SITE #: MN-MSP0080 SITE NAME: GOLDEN VALLEY 169 & MEDICINE LAKE RD. 2801 HILLSBORO AVE. N. NEW HOPE, MN 55427 TAlLEST APPURT. ~ 10".!> 010 ELEV=937.9 No. Date NEW HOPE 1024.1 ~025'4 A * 102M i~02M foze'5 Jb02L2 'OZ1'~017'7[ 1019['6 1017'6f~;~3 1009.6 1009.9ll,009.6 F 1026'0 N 1026.2 1025.4~ ;t. . -1021.2 lr I ..-1022.6 IOZ1.3' . 10Z1. ~019.4 1018.0l J0l7.6 0018.4 11..1--1009.' 1009.9 . J tOOS).9- 102:1, SOUTH FACE 1022.6 1019,"1'-'0 ELEV=937.9 I HERF.llY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TliAT I AM A DULY LICENSED lAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE tAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: BRYAN T. BAlCl5iK.'T.S. LICENSE /I 42594 REVISIONS By CI1K I APP'D DATE: 11/19/0~ 1} 1022.' )( 1019.6 P 0494AOI23.000 TALLEST APPORT. 1099.' TOP tIGHT 1086.9 ANTENNA BASE 1078.8 NEW HOPE 1025.4* 1021.3Jl: Q (025.5 1'026'5 1,oz7., 1025.0 ~ 1021.2 1020.1 1020.6 1021.2 1017.6~ 1017.9~ 1009.9~ 1009..~ 1018.' 1009:9 NORTH FACE lJ 2009wtDS!HH SMITH NOLnNG !IUU. SCALE ON 22"x34- MEOlA HALf' SCALEQtoI 11'x11"MEOIA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS LAND SURVEYORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES J\!.'EXA.'il)AAI\\'l: nEt.'iO..'l.MU 6RAlNEllD.IV/Il CAOOKStOM.ltft I3!Ul;OI'(lfll($,NO REO W~G. tiN ROCW:;lm:!'lMH I$IOUXMt.U).W