Loading...
04-13-10 CM Agenda Packet AGENDA Council/Manager Meeting Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room April 13, 2010 6:30 pm or immediately following the HRA meeting 1. 2010 Pavement Maintenance Strategies 2. Watermain Rehabilitation Projects 3. Social Host Ordinance 4. 3rd Lair Skate Park Youth Cooperative Agreement 5. Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Section 4.05 - Restricting Exterior Use of Sheet Metal Siding 6. Proposed Moratorium - Douglas Drive Corridor Study Area 7. Organizing Local Business Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed for the Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and provide general directions to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and listen to the discussion; public participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council. This dpcumentisavailable in alternate formats upon a 72-hour request. Please call 763-S93-B006(tTy: 763-593-3968) to make a request. Examples of alternate formats may include large print, electronic, Braille, audiocassette,. etc. Hey Me ran Public Works 763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting April 13, 2010 Agenda Item 1. 2010 Pavement Maintenance Strategies Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator Summary City staff has identified premature deterioration of the asphalt wearing course pavement on several City streets that were reconstructed within the last 10 to 15 years. Of primary concern is portions of St. Croix (Douglas Drive to Duluth Street), portions of Olympia (Winnetka to Douglas), Schaper Drive (TH 55 to Ottawa Avenue), and the North TH 55 Frontage Road (Schaper Drive to approximately 700 feet west). In order to assist in determining the origin of the premature deterioration, Public Works staff met and inspected the streets with a representative of the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT) Road Research Division. MnDOT staff advised that they have seen similar deterioration consistent with the defects appearing on Golden Valley streets in several other areas in the state. In order to determine the cause of the premature deterioration, MnDOT is seeking funding to have the Local Road Research Board (LRRB) perform testing on defective pavements as well as adjacent "control section" pavements where the defects are not present. Funding is expected to be available in the summer of 2010. MnDOT staff has theorized that the problem could be due to moisture collecting under the chip seals that many cities use for normal maintenance, thereby sustaining damage through the freeze-thaw cycle. Another potential cause may be from use of aggregate in the asphalt production that may be susceptible to stripping; in other words, the bituminous material in the asphalt fails to stick to the aggregate and eventually breaks down. City staff has noticed the highest incidence of deterioration in Golden Valley seems to be on higher traffic volume streets where asphalt polymer is included in the bitumen (oil) used for the chip seals to more effectively lock the aggregate in place. Based on the condition of the streets and the unknown concern about the impact of sealcoating, MnDOT and City staff believes it is in the best interest of the City to alter its pavement maintenance strategies for this year. This will allow time for MnDOT to complete the study with the LRRB and will provide additional funding for overlays on streets where the need is justified. Therefore, staff is proposing that funding in the amount of $140,000 that is set aside for sealcoating be incorporated into the overlay budget. As a result, it is recommended that overlays be performed in 2010 with priorities placed as follows: 1. St. Croix Avenue from Douglas Drive to Lilac Drive 2. Schaper Drive from TH 55 to Ottawa Avenue 3. North TH 55 frontage road from Schaper Drive to approximately 700 feet west 4. Olympia Street from Winnetka Avenue to Pennsylvania Avenue 5. Olympia Street from Pennsylvania Avenue to Douglas Drive $50,000 will remain in the sealcoating budget to be used for placement of a sealcoat on Douglas Drive from Golden Valley Road to St. Croix to accommodate the proposed lane reconfiguration on that segment. Attachments Proposed 2010 Asphalt Overlay Location Map (1 page) I I I Z 0 Lindsay St \ ~ ,Ii .~ Cl I I ko. ~ ' o Q ~ -----'---...... 1 ,. ~ I ~ '1\ .!:I, Ql ,!P,l- 01 a I'I' gr N .11\\\\ TH55 ~; I ~_-=..-".==-_ 2-Ji'l\l~ q~ Fr Olson Mexb. -Hwi-- ''7\~?t;?- =~~~~~ - ,I \1\,11 ~onta9'e Rd Z ~\ \ \ \I ~ CJ ~ ~\\\I III 0 ,11\ ,..,.. \\ \\ ~'~ \\\', Y],tl '" 0 L-\\~ -~ [PO- \\ "", \'~. \." '" ' \' ! i i i i I i ',cine Lake Rd ! ~",""",-;,~--!..,..:".l~_""_.!--"'-~==:'-g,.~*_""'=.b=="____."=_~__~~__L"_---7----'" r-.J--~----- I IJ) Ql '---- ~ ~ !' IJ) '"d ctl 'l:I ctl :> Ql , I 123rd ..., ~AV~ ~ t L i I ---~ ~ ~ o Sandburg i i Z' ClJ' ~ nl "', ~ <.-: !::: .~ ~ "" :~: .6 OlYmpia St ~ve :::-- ' ~- , n~ ,/ '-- I :.......... I I ~O" I :\W1 <;::) ~3- o.e~ OJ@: C~untry Club Dr 1J)'t! rg a IJ) '-- -. \~ S Vl ~ Z ,> >' 'I-! . , _ IJ) 0 ==C'=- C?~ 10 ~ if Harold Ave ...... d" p JVestern 1!Ye ;>,'Z Ql ClJ ~ :> ~'~ fI:l ~- ; Laurel Ave D 4 _ ""r- I--.J Proposed Overlays 1111 !I;~. -' 'i- I !, 'I' _.1'-- ! t _ hi ~. - ii II C~lver Rd I \ ~ li!lt. ... __-'____11 I t:) J --"I I ii () \ .I 11\ III \ .'U II 11 II '~ j\\ _ ~ll~~\ D~l'Qth Sf --qiILW- ~ II 'I' ~ , I /I ! 1!6 Ii' \il i'li o \J 2010 Proposed Asphalt Overlay Location Map r 4--.J . - - ~ I _1_.... - -i _ _Z -~ IJ) .... ..Q o Z oJ I ~ r, o 100. l~, I ~il , <\J ~\ " ,\ N A Print Date: 3/26/10 Not to Scale I alley e ra m Public Works 763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting April 13, 2010 Agenda Item 2. Discuss Proposed Watermain Rehabilitation Projects Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Summary The City's existing trunk watermains on Boone Avenue and Legend Drive are structurally deficient. Corrosion problems have caused multiple watermain breaks in these areas over the past few years. In some cases, the watermain breaks have caused property damage. In order to address these issues, the 2010-2014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes a watermain rehabilitation project for these mains (W&SS-021, page 100). The extent of the proposed rehabilitation includes Boone Avenue between Plymouth Avenue and a point north of Golden Valley Road, and on Legend Drive between Legend Lane and Bassett Creek Drive. During development of the watermain rehabilitation project, staff investigated all available methods and technologies, ranging from excavation and replacement to in-place measures such as pipe bursting and lining. Based upon the function and locations of these watermains, it was determined that in-place measures were appropriate. Furthermore, because portions of these watermains are supported by structural piling, pipe bursting methods were eliminated from consideration. Therefore, the use of watermain lining, similar to sanitary sewer lining, was selected as the rehabilitation method. The City Council recently requested that this CIP project be discussed at a Council/Manager meeting. Specific concerns relating to this project include the safety of the lining methods for potable water and the professional engineering services related to the project. These issues are discussed in this memorandum. Product Safety NSF International is an independent, not for profit, nongovernmental organization that certifies products and writes standards for food, water, and consumer goods. Items certified by NSF include food processing products, cookware, appliances, plumbing materials, and equipment utilized in potable water supply and treatment. NSF/ANSI Standard 61: Drinking Water System Components-Health Effects, addresses crucial aspects of drinking water system components to determine if contaminants that leach or migrate from the product or material into the drinking water are above acceptable levels. The NSF 61 Certification covers all products in the processing and delivery of potable water supplies from the well or intake to the faucet. Mr. Dave Purkiss, General Manager for Water Treatment and Distribution Systems for NSF International will be present at the Council/Manager meeting to discuss the safety of the structural watermain lining products being considered for the proposed rehabilitation project. EnQineerinQ Services Public Works staff has solicited a proposal from the consulting engineering firm of SEH, Inc. for design and construction services for this watermain rehabilitation project. SEH, Inc. is among the pool of consultants that the City utilizes for professional engineering services. Under Minnesota law, local governments are not required to "bid" professional services that include engineering, legal, accounting, among other professions. During the preliminary planning process of public improvement projects, Public Works staff determines if specialized engineering services are required. If the need for professional engineering services is present, staff reviews the capabilities of each of the firms in the consultant pool to determine if one of the firms has expertise in the specific engineering area. If that expertise is present, staff requests a proposal for professional services from that firm for the project. Mr. Paul Pasko, PE, Project Manager for SEH, Inc., is widely known for his expertise in the field of "in-situ" (in-place) pipeline rehabilitation and horizontal drilling pipeline installation, will be the project engineer for this project. Among the successful projects in this area include the City of Edina's Country Club, Pamela Park, and St. John's Park street rehabilitation projects. Each of these projects contained in-situ pipe rehabilitation components. In specific, the work in the Country Club neighborhood has been widely recognized in Minnesota and across the country for its successful completion. Attachments Professional Services Agreement from SEH, Inc. dated January 29, 2010 (15 pages) Jt...:'.....: .., .:... ,~ .,~0.. SEH January 29,2010 RE: Golden Valley, Minnesota Boone A venue and Legend Drive / Legend Lane Trunk Water Main Pipe Rehabilitation SEHNo. A-GOLDVII0735 10.00 Mr. Jeff Oliver City Engineer City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427-4588 Dear Jeff: Thank you very much for asking SEH to assist the City of Golden Valley (City) with its Boone Avenue and Legend Drive / Legend Lane Trunk Water Main Pipe (pipe) Rehabilitation Projects (Project). This letter serves as the Supplemental Letter Agreement to provide the City with bid document preparation, bidding assistance, and construction phase services for this project in accordance with the Agreement for Professional Services between the City and SBH. Background We understand the following items to be true in this project area. I. Recent increases in the amounts of maintenance required by the pipes serving the businesses and homes shown in Figures I and 2 enclosed with the Supplemental Letter Agreement has caused City staff to consider rehabilitation of the pipes. 2. The water service pipes and curb stop boxes serving these businesses and homes are in satisfactory condition. 3. Existing subgrade soils along Boone Avenue will not easily support pipe reconstruction by open- cut method. Several hundred feet of the pipe along Boone Avenue is installed on a piling foundation driven to an unknown depth. 4. No records exist detailing how the pipe is attached to the top of the piling along Boone Avenue. Fortunately, recent advances in the cured-in-place-pipe liner method (CIPP) of pipe rehabilitation gives the City an option to rehabilitate these pipes with very minimal excavation and without damaging the existing water service pipes. Several companies now fabricate these liners and know how to install them. Our experience with this method tells us that the City can secure competitive pricing to successfully apply this method to rehabiJitate its pipes in the project area. Therefore, SEH proposes to prepare bidding documents using CIPP to rehabilitate Boone A venue and Legend Drive / Legend Lane pipes as a single contract package. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1090 I Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com I 952.912.2600 I 800.734.6757 I 952.912.260 I fax Mr. Jeff Oliver January 29,2010 Page 2 Project Team Sue Mason is the client service manager for all projects undertaken by SEH in the City. Paul Pasko will be the project manager responsible for successfully executing the work plan for this project. Chad Millner will assist Paul Pasko as our project engineer. Paul and Chad both have extensive experience with CIPP and projects of this type. Compensation For the City's convenience, we prepared a work plan for the Boone Avenue project separately from the Legend Drive / Legend Lane project. Our work plan for each project is enclosed with this Supplemental Letter Agreement as a Task Hour Budget (THB). The table below summarizes the estimated engineering fee for each project. Project Estimated Ene:ineerine: Fee Boone Avenue $100,641 Legend Drive / Legend Lane $56,959 Total Fee $157,600 A conceptual level construction cost for this work is $800,000. Our fees to prepare bid documents, assist the City with bidding, and provide part-time construction phase services will likely cost the City 19.7% of this project's likely construction cost. . We respectfully request compensation for the work described by our THBs on an hourly basis. Compensation will be based on the hourly cost of personnel plus reimbursable expenses, including reproductions, mileage, car allowance, and equipment. Additional services required beyond the tasks and estimated hours as described in the THB's can be negotiated or provided as extra work on an hourly basis. Schedule Our anticipated project production schedule is given in the table below. Work Item Work Work Item Descript~on Work Item Key Item No. Milestone Date I City Council Considers our Proposal at its Regularly February 16,2010 Scheduled Meeting 2 Begin Work on the Bidding Documents February 17,2010 3 Neighborhood / Informational Meeting March 16,2010 4 City Review of Bidding Documents April 12, 2010 5 Post Final Bidding Documents Online May 5, 2010 6 Open Bids June 10,2010 7 Begin Construction July 5, 2010 This Supplemental Letter Agreement, Figure's No. I and No.2, the THBs, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. If this document satisfactorily sets forth your understanding of our agreement, please sign in the space below and return one copy to our office. Mr. Jeff Oliver January 29,2010 Page 3 We look forward to working with you, your staff, and the community to apply this exciting technology in the City. Respectively submitted, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. :ltu/r;L~w Paul J. Pasko Ill, PE, Principal Project Manager Enclosures c: Sue Mason, SEH (with Enclosures) p:lfjlglgoldvlt I073SIIgeolllO\cipp watermain t 29 to.doc Approved this day of ,2010 City of Golden Valley, Minnesota By .t.',':'.. ~ 71 o 100 200 - - 400 Feel 1'" 200' .~- ,. .:~..~ .t."~';' ...., '. .l . tf \0, r'L\ " '. -, j....'4q.~.>" -'. ~.. · lj C::J ,~., f!~ i.,-, ~' ,~"" f : _~. ~ t 1;1.:':.- ~- . .- :t=:!"~IUI"I\'. ....". ,~~'~- ;v];, Ii .11 f'\Q.i;' ~ ' "r." .~- ~I .~1it<. .. ~ "@)\,,,,~--..,.I."'. '.' ' ." !f! ..,.>~;,~~~..~~- , ""'ih' "'i, ;,](:jt. . .... It - ,-- =+ ":;' .~. ,.j~.._,>)f'..~f .~. "'-.JIII U"...II.... ....~" . v 'j<-o'II · 41' 'r .' . , .0 '-to ll-. .. __ . 1 "tU. .. CIil!l!J . ,~ .~ .. ..I. ~"---:, - llU.f If{ I II, ---'" ~ ; 0 r ....... .- "'~I I .r .' ~"',~ . ' .. ~ ,,~. I ~ _-' . .- "'... .... t- " ,'u II III "'fH' I . """, I~. !.. I If- . i ~ Jc .' --.".:.J.. ~ ;'H~;' '" oi .. If! I ~- r: ~ j gf:' t=t . I!....... ';'; 'If; ""'" .q J," . I ! " (t\~\'oIi,' , &:.I .' -"'1 f~. u.IMr- ~ . ~ ~'. . "' .) ~. . I J......J.i. .: ',J. ....:;...r.........I. 'l ',~_ '"\.~ '-. "'i l.i .- ~ fl,';';" , . f~' I- ,:~ ';' ,) ~~ r I ,,;,. ;.... ';~ , ~ .' t, J~~ = .. u. ~ ~ j"j ii ~f'f . .~ ~ lD! :J . i t" ,g :.: .:'~, . ~. := " I r';o ",; ~~.. ~l ',',.".. ."........._"" <;, f .. .- ~.J; ~. . f. '. . . . ,It 1 . ' . .' '",,,,,'iiDJ.f-.~ ,. .> . ,.- ""', ~ SEH Task Hour Budget City of Golden Valley Boone Avenue Trunk Water Main Pipe Rehabilitation January 29,2010 ESTIMATED HOURS ESTIMATED CLIENT PROJECT SENIOR GEOTECH PROJECT STAFF COST PROJECT TASKS SERVICE MANAGER GEOTECH ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER GIS ADMINTECII MANAGER ENGINEER Bid Document Preparation Services (1) 1.0 Data Collection 1.1 Review of Geotechnical Information 1.1.1 Subsurface Investigation (3)(4)(35)(30) 2 2 2 1 1.1.2 Preoare technical memorandum (36) 2 8 12 1.2 City Suoolied Information (5)(43) 1.2.1 City Water Main Break Information 1 1 2 1.2.2 Past geotechnical investigations 1 1 Tabulation of water service pipe diameters per address 1.2.3 in the oroiect area 1 One (1) IIxI7 paper copy of the City's current water 1.2.4 main atlas sheets (40) 1 1.2.5 List of working water main gate valves (37) 1 1 1.3 Gather Pronertv Information (45) 4 4 6 2 1.3 Private Utility Comoanv Atlases (6) 6 8 2 1.4 Field Reconnaissance 1.4.1 Street & utility reconnaissance with oictures (2) 4 3 6 2 Subtotal Labor Cost $9,846 2.0 Bid Document Preparation (8) 2.1 Plans (7)(20)(42) 2.1.1 Cured-In-Place Method Layout (9) 4 4 4 2.1.2 Location mao (41) 2 2.1.3 Suggested Stamng I Phasing Plan (22) 6 6 6 2.1.4 Water Service Plan (19) 4 4 4 2.1.5 Construction Limits (24) 4 4 4 2.1.6 Temoorarv Watermain Layout (18) 4 6 6 2.1.7 Traffic Control (21) 4 4 4 2.1.8 Street I Boulevard Restoration 4 4 4 Subtotal Lahor Cost $11,115 Page 1 of 5 ESTIMATED HOURS ESTIMATED CLIENT PROJECT SENIOR GEOTECH PROJECT STAFF COST PROJECT TASKS SERVICE MANAGER GEOTECH ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER GIS ADMIN TECH MANAGER ENGINEER 2.2 Proiect Manual 28 2.2.1 Proposal Form (26)l29) 10 12 10 2.2.2 Proposal Form (26)l29) 40 40 15 20 2.2.3 Appendix (38)(39) 4 3 3 3 Subtotal Labor Cost $19,1176 2.3 Quantities & Opinion of Probable Cost (23) 2.3.1 Quantity Calculations 2.3.1.1 Water Main 2 2 8 2.3.1.2 Street! Boulevard Restoration 2 2 8 2.3.2 Opinion of Probable Cost (27) 2.3.2.1 Water Main 2 4 8 2.3.2.2 Street / Boulevard Restoration 2 4 8 Subtotal Labor Cost $5,251 2.4 Agency Review, Permitting and Meetin!!;S 2.4.1 Agency Review 2.4.1.1 PrivateUtilityCompanies(ll) 1 2 2 2.4.1.2 Watershed District (I 2) 1 2 2 2.4.1.3 MnDOT (46) 6 6 2 2.4.2 Permitting 2.4.2.1 MDH - Water Main Permit (44) 1 2 2 1 1 2.4.2.2 NPDES / MPCA SWPPP 1 2 2 1 1 2.4.2.3 Watershed Grading and Erosion Control Permit 1 2 2 1 1 2.4.3 MnDOT(47) 1 1 2.4.3 Meetin!!;S (15) 2.4.3.1 With City Staff 2.4.3.1.1 Kick-offMeeting 1 4 4 2 1 2.4.3.1.2 Review 50% Plan set Meeting 1 4 4 2 1 2.4.3.1.3 Review 90% Plan set Meeting 1 4 4 2 1 2.4.3.2 With Affected Property Owners 2.4.3 .2.1 Informational Review Meeting (31) 2 6 8 8 3 4 2.4.3.3 With Fire Department 2.4.3.3.1 Review 50% Plan Set(32) 1 4 4 3 2 Subtotal Labor Cost " ; $15,098 Bidding Assistance SCn'ices 3.0 Biddinr Assistance 3.1 Ad for Bids 1 1 3.1.1 Respond to Bid InQUires 3 3 3 3.1.2 AddendUIIIS 4 4 6 3.1.3 Attend Bid Opening 4 4 2 3.1.4 Prepare Tabulation of Bids (34) 2 6 Page 2 of 5 ESTIMATED HOURS ESTIMATED CLIENT PROJECT SENIOR GEOTECH PROJECT STAFF COST PROJECT TASKS SERVICE MANAGER GEOTECH ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER GIS ADMIN TECH MANAGER ENGINEER 3.2 Preoare Electronic Bid Documents (33) 3.2.1 Plans 2 4 4 6 3.2.2 ProJect Manual 2 4 4 6 Construction Phase Services (17) 4.0 Construction Phase Services 4.1 Prepare Construction Contracts 4 4 4 2 4.2 Pre-Construction Meeting (13) 4 4 4 2 4.3 Construction lnsoection (14) 160 8 4.4 Construction Administration (16) 16 60 16 4.5 As-built Information (20) 32 CLIENT PROJECT SENIOR GEOTECH PROJECT STAFF ESTIMATED SERVICE GEOTECH GIS ADMIN TECH MANAGER MANAGER ENGIN1r.ER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER COST PROJECf COST SUMMARY Bid Document Preparation Services (1) Subtotal Hours 6 141 10 14 155 136 10 50 522 Subtotal Labor Cost $60,386.14 Subtotal Exoenses $300.00 Subtotal $60,686.14 Biddine: Assistance Services Subtotal Hours 11 22 15 27 75 Subtotal Labor Cost $7,818.57 Subtotal Expenses $150.00 Subtotal $7,968.57 Construction Phase Services (17) Subtotal Hours 24 68 200 28 320 Subtotal Labor Cost $30,401.95 Subtotal Expenses $1,584.34 Subtotal $31,986.29 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $100,641.00 P:\FJ\G\Goldv\110735\1Gen~10\lBoone Ave CIPP THB final.x1s1Hours-Costs NOTES I Project will be designed using City GIS utility base mapping, aerial photography, and field reconnaissance data. No topographic surveying is needed. 2 Task includes noting locations of boulevard features possibly impacted by utility reconstruction. Task also includes noting the existence of gate valves, hydrants, curb stops, manholes, and catch basins. Photos wiII be saved in digital format. Snow removal is not included in the scope of this work item. We wiII do the best we can working with the snow cover on the ground. Page 3 of 5 ESTIMATED HOURS ESTIMATED COST CLIENT SERVICE MANAGER I MaI'I"''''''''' I ENGINEER 3 Drilling and testing of core samples is not normal or customary with cured in place pipe lining method of reconstruction. Instead a general identification of the existing subgrade soils is provided to the bidders. 4 Investigation includes reviewing past nearby geotechnical information provided by the City, soil maps, and asking the City what type of subgrade soils they encountered during past watermain repairs. 5 City supplied information includes sanitary and storm sewer, water main, and street as-built plans, airflown contours, right of way, and property lines. DWG base mapping suitable for use as bid document plan sheets. 6 Task includes performing a Gopher State One Call and adding the private utility line work to the base mapping. 7 Task includes determining pipe crossing conflicts, depicting conflicts, and noting previous water main repairs on the plan sheets in areas of excavations. 8 Task include two submittals to the City of plans, project manual, and opinion of probable cost. A preliminary review at 50% complete bid documents and final review 2 weeks prior to posting of final bid documents online. This task assumes the City will coordinate reviews between the engineering and public works departments. 9 Task includes determining suggested locations for equipment staging, insertion pits, fitting removals, gate valves, and wet tap valves for staging. 10 Not used II Task is necessary only if conflicts with private utilities are discovered during the design phase. 12 Task assumes a watershed review of plans. 13 Assumes SEH prepares invitations, agenda, and minutes and facilitates the meeting. 14 Assumes 20 hours per week for 8 weeks of construction for the project engineer classification. 15 Task assumes SEH will not attend any City Council meetings related to this project. 16 Task assumes 6 hours per week for 10 weeks. Task assumes SEH will create the application for payments, weekly property owner notifications, facilitate weekly on-site construction meetings, and prepare meeting minutes. The City will copy and mail property owner notifications. 17 Task assumes no construction staking or survey quality as-builts will be needed. 18 Task involves identifying suggested connection points, valve operation, location of the service pipe, and possible conflicts with traffic necessary to provide continuous water service to the property owners in the project area. 19 While water service pipe reconstruction is not needed using cured in place pipe lining, this task assumes that a few water services will not be able to be reestablished robotically. Therefore this task will design the contingency reconstruction of particular segments of existing water service pipe, corporation stops, and possibly curb stop boxes with direction from City staff. 20 Plans will be created and submitted in AutoCad format. 21 Task identifies traffic requirements on Boone Avenue and access requirements for the properties affected by the watermain reconstruction. 22 Task includes identifYing the need for and location of wet tap watermain valves. 23 Quantities and probable cost will be compiled in a columnar format allowing the City to see the cost of the Legend Drive I Legend Lane project together, yet separately, from the Boone Avenue project. 24 Task includes investigating the means and methods that result in a small reconstruction footprint 25 Task assumes the City will provide SEH with a DOC tile of their standard special provisions as a point of beginning for our work. 26 Task will likely include preparing bidder qualification language. 27 SEH will prepare the opinion in a XLS format. 28 Assume the City's specification is the 2005 edition of MnDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction. 29 The proposal form will feature bid items from the Legend Drive I Legend Lane project as Schedule A and bid items for the Boone Avenue project as schedule B. The proposal form will explain that the City 30 Because the special provisions will direct the Contractor to provide dewatering to match what they encounter in the field, an investigation of water table elevations in not included in this work plan. 31 City will prepare and mail the invitation to this meeting. SEH and City staffwill attend this meeting. The meeting will be held at City Hall. The meeting will be informal and built around up to 2 copies of a color scaled graphic of the proposed improvements hung on the wall for review by the property owners. Property owner comments will be collected at this meeting as notes written on the graphic for possible inclusion in the tiual bidding documents. 32 Meeting will capture comments and "buy-in" from the tire department regarding the staging plan and use oftemporary water. PROJECT TASKS ADMIN TECH Page 4 of 5 ESTIMATED HOURS ESTIMATED COST CUENT SERVICE MANAGER I mAnAb~K I ENGHmER . _ 33 Because the project may be bid by out state contractors we recommend that the City sell the bidding documents and issue any addenda via the internet. SEH can provide this service to the City using its own web site. 34 Tabulation will be in a XLS format. 3S No drilling or sampling will be undertaken as part of this project. 36 The memo will comment on the existing subgrade soil conditions in relation to cured-in-place watermain operations. The memo will be included in the appendix to the project manual. 37 We will use this list during preparation of the suggested staging plan. 38 Include the technical memorandum, including any soils borings from past City geotechnical information, in the Appendix. 39 Include the Ilxl7 bid document plan sheets, Ilxl7 copies of the City's current water main atlas sheets, and pertinent digital photos of boulevard or driveway conditions in the Appendix. 40 Atlas sheet needs to show the profile of the water main pipe 41 Using a Ilxl7 copy of the City's Streets, Parks, and Trails map, show the location of both Legend Drive / Legend Lane project and the Boone Avenue project. Bidders will likely use this map when considering their bid unit price for mobilization. 42 Based on discussions with City staff, no water system modeling will be done as part of this project. It is assumed that the slight decrease in the inside diameter of the water main trunk pipes to be lined will not adversely affect the amount of flow or pressure provided by these trunk pipes. 43 Task includes verifying or correcting public utility information contained in the DWG base mapping file supplied by the City such as pipe location, size, and flow direction. 44 We understand MDH has already reviewed and issued a permit for a similar project in Minnesota. Based on this, we assume a normal and customary amount of effort is needed by SEH to secure this permit on behalf of the City. 4S Task includes creating a matrix of business name, maintenance contacts, type of business, water requirements, allowable times for water shut-offs to connect and disconnect from temporary water service, and possible locations of temporary water service connection points. 46 MnDOT review may be necessary depending on the scope of work needed at TH 55. 47 MnDOT ROW permit may be necessary depending on the scope of work needed at TH 55. PROJECT TASKS ADMIN TECH Page 5 of 5 ~ SEH Task Hour Budget City of Golden Valley Legend Drive / Legend Lane Trunk Water Main Pipe Rehabilitation January 29, 2010 ESTIMATED HOURS ESTIMATED CLIENT PROn:cr SENIOR GEOTECH PROn:cr STAFF COST PROJECT TASKS SERVICE MANAGER GEOTECH ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER GIS ADMIN TECH MANAGER ENGINEER Bid Document Preparation Services (I) 1.0 Data Collection 1.1 Review of Geotechnical Information 1.1.1 Subsurface Investigation (3)(4)(35)(30) 1 1 1 1 1 1.1.2 Prepare technical memorandum (36) 5 7 1.2 City Supplied Information (5)(43) 1.2.1 City Water Main Break Information 1 1.2.2 Past geotechnical investigations 1 1 Tabulation of water service pipe diameters per address 1.2.3 in the proiect area 1 One (1) llxl7 paper copy of the City's current water 1.2.4 main atlas sheets (40) 1 1.2.5 List of working water main gate valves (37) 1 1 1.3 Private Utility Company Atlases (6) 4 6 2 1.4 Field Reconnaissance 1.4.1 Street & utility reconnaissance with pictures (2) 1 1 4 2 Subtotal Labor Cost $4,741 2.0 Bid Document Preparation (8) 2.1 Plans (7)(20)(42) 2.1.1 Cured-In-Place Method Layout (9) 1 2 3 2.1.2 Location map (41) 2 2.1.3 Suggested Staging / Phasing Plan (22) 1 2 3 2.1.4 Water Service Plan (19) 1 2 3 2.1.5 Construction Limits (24) 1 2 3 2.1.6 Temporary Watermain Layout (I8) 1 2 3 2.1.7 Traffic Control (21) 1 2 3 2.1.8 Street / Boulevard Restoration 1 2 3 Subtotal Labor Cost $4,5611 Page 1 of 5 ESTIMATED HOURS ESTIMATED CLIENT PROJECT SENIOR GEOTECH PROJECT STAFF COST PROJECT TASKS SERVICE MANAGER GEOTECH ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER GIS ADMIN TECH MANAGER ENGINEER 2.2 Project Manual (28) 2.2.1 Proposal Form (26)(29) 2 2 2 4 2.2.2 Special Provisions (25) 10 20 8 18 2.2.3 Appendix (38)(39) 3 2 2 2 Subtotal Labor Cost $8,158 2.3 Quantities & Opinion of Probable Cost (23) 2.3.1 Ouantity Calculations 2.3.1.1 Water Main 1 2 5 2.3.1.2 Street I Boulevard Restoration 1 2 5 2.3.2 Opinion of Probable Cost (27) 2.3.2.1 Water Main 1 2 5 2.3.2.2 Street I Boulevard Restoration 1 2 5 Subtotal Labor Cost $3,177 2.4 Agency Review, Pennitting and Meetings 2.4.1 Agency Review 2.4.1.1 Private Utility Companies (11) 1 1 1 2.4.1.2 Watershed District (12) 1 1 1 2.4.2 Pennitting 2.4.2.1 MDH - Water Main Permit (44) 1 1 1 1 1 2.4.2.2 NPDES I MPCA SWPPP 1 1 1 1 1 2.4.2.3 Watershed Grading and Erosion Control Permit 1 1 1 1 1 2.4.3 Meetings (15) 2.4.3.1 With City Staff 2.4.3.1.1 Kick-offMeeting 1 3 3 1 1 1 2.4.3.1.2 Review 50% Plan set Meeting 1 3 3 1 2.4.3.1.3 Review 90% Plan set Meeting 1 3 3 1 2.4.3.2 With Affected Property Owners 2.4.3.2.1 Informational Review Meeting (31 ) 1 3 4 4 2 2 2.4.3.3 With Fire Department 2.4.3.3.1 Review 50% Plan Set (32) 3 3 1 2 Subtotal Labor Cost $8,647 Biddin2 Assistance Services 3.0 Bidding Assistance 3.1 Ad for Bids 1 1 3.1.1 Respond to Bid Inquires 2 2 1 3.1.2 Addendum; 1 2 1 3 3.1.3 Attend Bid Opening 1 1 1 3.1.4 Prepare Tabulation of Bids (34) 1 1 4 3.2 Prepare Electronic Bid Documents (33) 3.2.1 Plans 1 3 4 4 3.2.2 Proiect Manual 1 3 4 4 Page 2 of 5 ESTIMATED HOURS ESTIMATED CLIENT PROJECf SENIOR GEOTECH PROJECf STAFF COST PROJECT TASKS SERVICE MANAGER GEOTECH ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER GIS ADMIN TECH MANAGER ENGINEER Construction Phase Services (17) 4.0 Construction Phase Services 4.1 Prepare Construction Contracts 1 1 1 1 4.2 Pre-Construction Meetinl!: (13) 2 2 2 1 4.3 Construction Inspection (14) 120 6 4.4 Construction Administration (6) 12 40 12 4.5 As-built Information (20) 24 CLIENT PROJECf SENIOR GEOTECH PROJECf STAFF ESTIMATED SERVICE GEOTECH GIS ADMIN TECH MAN~GER MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY Bid Document Preparation Services (1) Subtotal Hours 4 48 6 8 77 82 10 32 267 Subtotal Labor Cost $29,283.31 Subtotal EXDenses $300.00 Subtotal $29,583.31 Biddiu Assistance Services Subtotal Hours 7 13 10 17 47 Subtotal Labor Cost $4,887.96 Subtotal EXDenses $150.00 Subtotal $5,037.96 Construction Phase Services (17) Subtotal Hours 15 43 147 20 225 Subtotal Labor Cost $21,110.29 Subtotal EXDenses $1,227.44 Subtotal $22,337.73 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH TIllS PROPOSAL: $56,959.00 P:\FJ\G\Goldv\110735\1GenMO\{Legend Dr_ Legend Lane CIPP THB finaLxls]Hours-Costs NOTES I Project will be designed using City GIS utility base mapping, aerial photography, and field reconnaissance data. No topographic surveying is needed. 2 Task includes noting locations of boulevard features possibly impacted by utility reconstruction. Task also includes noting the existence of gate valves, hydrants, curb stops, manholes, and catch basins. Photos will be saved in digital format. Snow removal is not included in the scope of this work item. We wil1 do the best we can working with the snow cover on the ground. 3 Dril1ing and testing of core samples is not normal or customary with cured in place pipe lining method of reconstruction. Instead a general identification of the existing subgrade soils is provided to the bidders. 4 Investigation includes reviewing past nearby geotechnical information provided by the City, soil maps, and asking the City what type of subgrade soils they encountered during past watermain repairs. Page 3 of 5 ESTIMATED CLIENT SENIOR COST I PROJECT TASKS I SERVICE GEOTECH MANAGER ENGINEER 5 City supplied information includes sanitary and storm sewer, water main, and street as-built plans, airflown contours, right of way, and property lines. DWG base mapping suitable for use as bid document plan sheets. 6 Task includes performing a Gopher State One Call and adding the private utility line work to the base mapping. 7 Task includes determining pipe crossing conflicts, depicting conflicts, and noting previous water main repairs on the plan sheets in areas of excavatious. 8 Task include two submittals to the City of plans, project manual, and opinion of probable cost. A preliminary review at 50% complete bid documents and fmal review 2 weeks prior to posting of final bid documents online. This task assumes the City will coordinate reviews between the engineering and public works departments. 9 Task includes determining suggested locations for equipment staging, insertion pits, fitting removals, gate valves, and wet tap valves for staging. 10 Not used II Task is necessary only if conflicts with private utilities are discovered during the design phase. 12 Task assumes a watershed review of plans. 13 Assumes SEH prepares invitations, agenda, and minutes and facilitates the meeting. 14 Assumes 15 hours per week for 8 weeks of construction for the project engineer classification. IS Task assumes SEH will not attend any City Council meetings related to this project. 16 Task assumes 4 hours per week for 10 weeks. Task assumes SEH will create the application for payments, weekly property owner notificatious, facilitate weekly on-site construction meetings, and prepare meeting minutes. The City will copy and mail property owner notifications. 17 Task assumes no construction staking or survey quality as-builts will be needed. 18 Task involves identifying suggested connection points, valve operation, location of the service pipe, and possible conflicts with traffic necessary to provide continuous water service to the property owners in the project area. 19 While water service pipe reconstruction is not needed using cured in place pipe lining, this task assumes that a few water services will not be able to be reestablished robotically. Therefore this task will design the contingency reconstruction of particular segments of existing water service pipe, corporation stops, and possibly curb stop boxes with direction from City staff. 20 Plans will be created and submitted in AutoCad format. 21 Task identifies access requirements for properties affected by the watermain reconstruction along Legend Avenue and Legend Lane. 22 Task includes identifying the need for and location of wet tap watermain valves. 23 Quantities and probable cost will be compiled in a columnar format allowing the City to see the cost of the Legend Drive I Legend Lane project together, yet separately, from the Boone Avenue project. 24 Task includes investigating the means and methods that result in a small reconstruction footprint 25 Task assumes the City will provide SEH with a DOC file of their standard special provisions as a point of beginning for our work. 26 Task will likely include preparing bidder qualification language. 27 SEH will prepare the opinion in a XLS format. 28 Assume the City's specification is the 2005 edition of MnDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction. 29 The proposal form will feature bid items from the Legend Drive I Legend Lane project as Schedule A and bid items for the Boone Avenue project as schedule B. The proposal form will explain that the City 30 Because the special provisions will direct the Contractor to provide dewatering to match what they encounter in the field, an investigation of water table elevations in not included in this work plan. 31 City will prepare and mail the invitation to this meeting. SEH and City staffwill attend this meeting. The meeting will be held at City Hall. The meeting will be informal and built around up to 2 copies of a color scaled graphic of the proposed improvements hung on the wall for review by the property owners. Property owner comments will be collected at this meeting as notes written on the graphic for possible inclusion in the final bidding documents. 32 Meeting will capture comments and "buy-in" from the fire department regarding the staging plan and use of temporary water. 33 Because the project may be bid by out state contractors we recommend that the City sell the bidding documents and issue any addenda via the internet. SEH can provide this service to the City using its own web site. ESTIMATED HOURS Page 4 of 5 ESTIMATED HOURS PROJECT TASKS CLIENT SERVICE MANAGER ESTIMATED COST ADMIN TECH 34 Tabulation will be in a XLS fonnat. 3S No drilling or sampling will be undertaken as part of this project. 36 The memo will comment on the existing subgrade soil conditions in relation to cured-in-place watennain operations. The memo will be included in the appendix to the project manual. 37 We will use this list during preparation of the suggested staging plan. 38 Include the technical memorandum, including any soils borings from past City geotechnical infonnation, in the Appendix. 39 Include the Ilxl7 bid document plan sheets, Ilxl7 copies of the City's current water main atlas sheets, and pertinent digital photos of boulevard or driveway conditions in the Appendix. 40 Atlas sheet needs to show the profile of the water main pipe 41 Using a Ilx17 copy of the City's Streets, Parks, and Trails map, show the location of both Legend Drive / Legend Lane project and the Boone Avenue project. Bidders will likely use this map when considering their bid unit price for mobilization. 42 Based on discussions with City staff, no water system modeling will be done as part of this project. It is assumed that the slight decrease in the inside diameter of the water main tnmk pipes to be lined will not adversely affect the amount of flow or pressure provided by these tnmk pipes. 43 Task includes verifying or correcting public utility infonnation contained in the DWG base mapping file supplied by the City such as pipe location, size, and flow direction. 44 We understand MDH has already reviewed and issued a permit for a similar project in Minnesota. Based on this, we assume a nonnal and customary amount of effort is needed by SEH to secure this pennit on behalf of the City. Page 5 of 5 PUblic Jl~y e n u Public Safety Department Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting April 13, 2010 Agenda Item 3. Social Host Ordinance Prepared By Stacy Altonen, Chief of Police Summary Many cities in Minnesota have adopted a social host ordinance, which makes it a crime for anyone to provide a venue for underage drinking to take place. While current laws are in place to make it a crime to provide alcohol to a minor, there is no state law that addresses the issue of providing a place (home, business, or other building) where minors are present and consuming alcohol. Several cities near Golden Valley have adopted a social host ordinance, including Crystal, Minneapolis and Minnetonka. Under ordinances in other cities individuals have been prosecuted for hosting parties where minors were present and consuming alcohol, regardless of whether they provided the alcohol or not. The ordinance is specific in that the person prosecuted is the person who was present at the time the party took place. Conversely, a homeowner who had no knowledge and was not home at the time of the party cannot be held responsible or charged under the ordinance. A social host violation would be considered a misdemeanor, similar to underage consumption. Providing alcohol to a minor is a gross misdemeanor. The goal is to increase public awareness of the problem of underage drinking and social host ordinances have proven to help law enforcement and prosecutors combat teenage drinking. Recommended Action Provide Staff direction on whether to proceed with a draft ordinance for consideration at a future City Council meeting. I alley M mo du Park and Recreation 763-512-2342/763-512-2344 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting April 13, 2010 Agenda Item 4. 3rd Lair Skate Park Youth Cooperative Agreement Prepared By Rick Jacobson, Director of Parks and Recreation Summary For the past several years, the City has entered into a yearly agreement with the 3rd Lair Skate Park to provide free use of their outdoor facility, a tier 2 skate park for use by all Golden Valley residents 18 years of age and younger, for a fee of $3,000. In 2009,87 Golden Valley youth took advantage of the 3rd Lair outdoor cooperative agreement using the park 1,056 times. Funds for this program are included in the 2010 budget. Staff will be present to answer questions regarding the continuation of this program. alley emo d Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting April 13, 2010 Agenda Item 5. Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Section 4.05 - Restricting Exterior Use of Sheet Metal Siding Prepared By Kevin Knase, Planning Intern Summary The Planning Department has been working on a proposed change to City Code Section 4.05: Design Control. The City has received requests from residents seeking to install corrugated siding on their homes. There is a desire among Staff to create language that relates directly to sheet metal (corrugated or plain) siding, making the regulation more explicit. Staff recommends placing this language within the Design Control section in Chapter 4 of the City Code. Because it is in Chapter 4, there is no opportunity to request a variance. The new regulation would restrict but not outlaw sheet metal siding based upon a percentage standard of the building surface that the siding could occupy. Attachments Underlined/Overscored Version - Section 4.05: Design Control (1 page) Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Amending Section 4.05, Restricting Exterior Use of Sheet Metal Siding (1 page) Section 4.05: Design Control Subdivision 1. Purpose It is deemed to be in the best interests of the City to promote the health, safety, general welfare, comfort and appearance by controlling the exterior design of new construction; by controlling the placement of previously used buildings; by regulating congestion and preventing fires and other danger; by assuring adequate light, ventilation and utility systems; and, preserving the value of property and encouraging appropriate land use. Subdivision 2. Prohibited Exterior Facing Except as allowed by proceedings under this Section, no building permit shall be issued for any structure having a front, (either) side, or rear abutting or facing a public street when such proposed structure contains exterior facing materials which tend to rapidly deteriorate or which for any reason are, or tend to quickly become, unsightly. The following are examples of materials which are prohibited by this Section: sand lime brick, concrete brick, unfinished structural clay tile, sheet met~1 (eithercorrug~ted or pl~in) and exposed unfinished concrete. Subdivision 3. Restricted Exterior Facinq Sheet metal (either corrugated or plain) shall be used only as an accent facing material and may not be used as the primary facing material on the exterior of any structure. No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the exterior facing material on anyone (1) side of a structure shall contain sheet metal (either corrugated or plain). Any sheet metal used as accent exterior facing material shall have a factory applied finish. ORDINANCE NO. ,2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Section 4.05, Restricting Exterior Use of Sheet Metal Siding The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Section 4.05 entitled "Design Control" is amended by deleting the words "sheet metal (either corrugated or plain)" from the last sentence in Subdivision 2. Section 2. City Code Section 4.05 entitled "Design Control" is amended by adding Subdivision 3 to read as follows: Subdivision 3. Restricted Exterior Facing Sheet metal (either corrugated or plain) shall be used only as an accent facing material and may not be used as the primary facing material on the exterior of any structure. No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the exterior facing material on anyone (1) side of a structure shall contain sheet metal (either corrugated or plain). Any sheet metal used as accent exterior facing material shall have a factory applied finish. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 4.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this day of ,2010. IslLinda R. Loomis Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: IslSusan M. Virniq Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk Hey m nd Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting April 13, 2010 Agenda Item 6. Proposed Moratorium - Douglas Drive Corridor Study Area Prepared By Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Summary In January, 2010 the City formally incorporated the Douglas Drive Corridor Study into its Comprehensive Plan. The Corridor Study was implemented for the purpose of guiding long- range land use planning along Douglas Drive. Although primarily residential in character, the Douglas Drive Corridor does contain several locations where it is appropriate for other land uses. One such location is the northeast intersection of Trunk Highway 55 and Douglas Drive, identified in the Corridor Study as the TH 55 Campus. This area has been defined as a potential future employment center. The Corridor Study establishes the following goals for the TH 55 Campus: . Reinforce employment uses . Reorganize roadway access and create parcels that are more developable . Create a better link to lane Avenue . Enhance the corridor's south "gateway" In an effort to analyze the goals and objectives of the Corridor Study, as well as to evaluate proper zoning and land use controls, staff is proposing to implement a moratorium on properties bounded by Douglas Drive to the west, TH 55 to the south, the Canadian Pacific Railroad to the east, and the Union Pacific railroad to the north (see attached map.) The proposed moratorium would apply to all properties located within the Expressway International Park plat and be in effect for one year. Attachment Interim Ordinance Imposing a Twelve Month Moratorium on Certain Development in Expressway International Park Blocks 1 and 2 (5 pages) INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. AN INTERIM ORDINANCE IMPOSING A TWELVE MONTH MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT IN EXPRESSWAY INTERNATIONAL PARK BLOCKS 1 AND 2, GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY (the "City") ORDAINS: WHEREAS, the City Staff, and the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Planning Commission and City Council, have had ongoing discussions regarding the development of the Douglas Drive Corridor (described in Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, the City Council of Golden Valley has authorized a study of, and the City Staff, are studying the existing conditions of the Douglas Drive Corridor including without limitation the Douglas Drive and Highway 55 intersection, and immediately adjacent areas to the northeast, and the impact of comprehensive changes to the development of the City of Golden Valley within the Douglas Drive Corridor (the "Study"); and WHEREAS, the Douglas Drive Corridor includes, as an area of influence, Expressway International Park Blocks 1 and 2 (the "Moratorium Area"), as legally described and depicted in Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, based on the preliminary Study results published in draft form on November 9, 2009, the City Council incorporated the Study into its Comprehensive Plan in January 2010, furthermore it has been recommended that the City Council consider the following with respect to the area of the Douglas Drive Corridor lying adjacent to Highway 55, (in the Study referred to as "TH 55 Campus") which area includes land in the Moratorium Area: (i) develop and adopt policies to reinforce employment uses at the south end of the corridor, and provide common functions to serve all of the development, and (ii) develop and adopt zoning and land use control changes that would enhance the Douglas Drive Corridor's south "gateway" with a more campus-like setting, reorganize roadway access to create parcels that are more developable, and create a better link to Zane Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City Council is considering adopting policies and modifying the Golden Valley Zoning Ordinance to incorporate the above recommendations in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, in order to protect the planning process and preserve the welfare of the citizens of Golden Valley, the City Council has determined it is necessary to place a twelve (12) month moratorium on: (i) issuing building permits that would increase the footprint of any existing building in the Moratorium Area; (ii) the application for, and construction of, new projects in the Moratorium Area; (iii) the application for, and approval of, rezoning or subdivision of any land in the Moratorium Area; and (iv) the application for, and approval of, a planned unit development or conditional use permit in the Moratorium Area where such development, rezoning, subdivision, conditional use permit or planned unit development would otherwise nullify the import and benefits of such Study until the Study is completed and considered by the City Council and all requisite notices and hearings are accomplished; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Golden Valley hereby adopts this Interim Ordinance pursuant to, inter alia, Minnesota Statute 9 462.355, subd. 4, imposing a twelve (12) month moratorium prohibiting: (i) the issuance of any building permits which would increase the footprint of any existing building in the Moratorium Area; (ii) the application for, and construction of, new projects in the Moratorium Area; (iii) the application for, and approval of any rezoning or subdivision within the Moratorium area; and (iv) the application for, and approval of, a planned unit development or conditional use permit in the Moratorium Area. During this twelve (12) month moratorium period, no new or existing applications for building permits or approval under Golden Valley Code, ch. 11 or ch. 12, shall be considered or granted which would result in: (i) development within the Moratorium Area that incorporates an increase in the footprint of any existing building in the Moratorium Area; (ii) any construction of new projects in the Moratorium Area; (iii) any rezoning or subdivision within the Moratorium Area, or (iv) any planned unit development or new conditional use in the Moratorium Area. This Interim Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council this day of ,2010. IslLinda R. Loomis Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: IslSusan M. Virniq Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk 1111 -"''''1 EXPRESSWAY INTERNATIONAL PARK BOOK PAGE_ C. R. DOC. NO. 'E.1lOW ax.r. !Ell BY ~ PRE'SElI'l'St Thet lat.un.atl.ond ~pe.r: cc.pany. & WI.... 'Yc>>'k corpoz.t1oA. owner ~nQ ~pd~tor oi tho ~U(JWing deacdbed FC,ptrty ~itust:eCl in the Ccurrty of lien_pin. S't..~ af Hina.&fX&. w 1111t.: 'l1lat pIIrt af tM Ilm:1:twest; ~rtelt' 0: the Sot1~uQuan.er. e.114 t:hlI,t. part af ~ SOIl.t~.t ~ af ~ NOrthwest. 2U8lt'tclli:'1 aU in. Seeti.on '33. 'l'QwIl.shLp lU ~, Jl&J\,g4I 11 ~Irt oi tM 5th 'JtI::oind.pd. Nerial..a.tl. &eeOrcliDg t:o tho 1:1'. $. c;crv.lt'_t wney t;he:t'll:Ot'. ee.scrlbed as toU-: ~i.nnirI9' at the. poiJlt. of ~1on of a 11M ~wn parallel ..,i't.h and. dlsurrt: 150.00 fMt. NCr1:bea:ly af. U "I.I;UAld at a ril3ht..""1k to. t'be .tollovJ.ngo duer1b.d Li_ Fl.. with. l1.fI8 d:n\o'n pnlle1. with aM Clist6nt. 80.00 1''1'11;; we~ly af'. '" _UUJ:04 at: ... rtsbt .f.n9k to. 'the o;enterUmo of tho llidn Un. t;l'aek of ~ ICiZllHlapalu. NO:'~W4 aM. SOUthern bUway riqU of _y as _ constl:UCted.1d opIrl1b:d ClVU' ~ ~II'S ...14 I.a=d.. t:1wnc:e on an aSSUlllGd ~1nq et !Cl1O.%O'SO"W e10/19 said 80.00 fecn: PKG1Lll lUte a ciiatance Of 92<<;.39 faet! thenee S""3t-'4.5"" .. dis't&nee at' 200.21 feet, thfux:e N69'"46'lO"'w a t11..ta~ af 146.OQ feet, tne- SO'"J.J'50"\l a d18t:ance of 91.90 ~r 'tbo~ ~o~'lO"W a \UI.tolru:e. of 11::.00 feat: t:he.nea SOoU'SORIf. cU.t.nce of .114.00 fettr the._ N89O+G'lO-w. 4Ut&llCe of 149.34 feet, t:1'IeftOe $01;th. di&tanee o! 343.75 feet, the.=elSenc.:d.llc] t.o ~ left .lon9' a tarqaldd CU%'"N having <II. rao!h1I. of 150.0G _t, dalt;A .tl'iJle. 9102.1'29", ~ . di.'t4n;:tI g~ 239.1.7 feet" 'theZlCC!l 1lI88-3S'1J,MZ a C1utance ~ atI.06 feat. 'l:bence SO'"'6'2J-E .a cti.a't:._ D~ 10.11 ~t, JIll"' C1' :Le.., 'to ..id Ita. d:r_ p&rl111el with anoa 150.00 fiNe ~l.y of. 1.1I .......~ .1: a ri<j:1tt 8nlJle to, die fo11cNa1l9' c!tl':ICribad Lift.!: Al thenQe &l.lJ'tU1y alOftq said lSO.OO foot p1n:allel .11.ne 'to 'the point: oC M9!.Jming. LJ.ne. A: 811qJ.naiJIq at; . .P3int otl the West IlJle of Mid Sect1.oft 33, 41IUftt:: 32S.70 .feet SOUth of the West 1/4 C'QZ"M.r thencf. thel\CCl rtlwnoq Southweat:eTly a't an .ft<JH d 1010 1.1.' with said _at line. for UO.90 feet; t.o th! poi.m o~ beqinn1.nq of 'tho 1~ to _ 4ncdbod; 'thcf\Cie .%'WU1ilIq NOrtheuterly on the as't .bOO.Nl de.scr1J:rcK1 coarae. tor 100.00 feet; the~ &Iflaetiall to tlte right <m ... 10 d\OR spiral ~ of deen..a1.:lq ndwa {1pJ:.1111\91e 1-07'3()~1 fa:' lSO.00 feet, tMnee defJAetillCJ' 'to tM right Oft. 1'"30' e.1rcIalar CIlZW {delta al'llO'1. 10-18'1 for 686.10 feet; ~DC'e dellectine; w.tha a:iqht on. 10 choW_ -SiNl ~ of increaeinlJ r.cUu' (spit".11lnq1e. 1'"01'30., fQ/r 150.00 .teetl thet:teG on tsRqent to ..14 ~ for SOO.O<l t"ellt &nC thonl tanRiMt:1nq. And IntC!lrNlt:lclnal l'apel' JWIa1'ty Corpont1cn. . DaJ,......re. ~&t.ion., OWMJ: &JKl. prcpr:i.etoJ: of tbll fol1.olw1no1 cillSc:rUocS ,p:operty rlt.ua<bt<< ill. the County of ae-pLll.. st.b! tit MirmeaoU. t.o ..J.1;: '!hilt JlI;rt of the: JIOrtbWe.llt Qr,larbtr of t11e soutbwe..t Quarter. and: that: part of tM Swt.tt-'lIt: prta- of the. No::chwtlat ~tc', 1111 111 seeu.m 33, ~p 11* ~tb.. R.... 2.1 West of the. Sth 1'r1N:i.plll Mer$.t:U.&n. accocclLn9 1:0 'tbl U. $. Ogye.~t lRJroIey thereof, aU lyinq ~her1.Y of' a 1J.rIa; drawn prnllel with aocl. ciUtant 150.00 te.:t. IfDrtberly of. as 1neuared at: . z:isht ar.q~ t:g the a]::IQve dueru..! ~ ,., .U lying Wertez:ly ...f .a 11_ drao.m parall.l wit!l 11M 4!.t.u1t: 80.00 fut 1iI..t:erly at. .s ~ .t . dCJht: _119le' to. ~ ce.1I~1M of t:ha _in lilw neck of 'the Jlbn..paUa, No3:'t.hfl.old..mI SCc.lthoJ:T< JlallW;f *'1<i"lt of _,. .. .cow c:~ qcl ofOdtad c;1Wlt ud &eZOSIll AoLa land, and all 1riAq 15ou'thel:ly of 'the SOIrthe:dy::i')h1: o.t _" l1ne of the M.l.aAl:IlI'CtA Weate.ra hil'way ec.mp.Qyl Deep*:: the. w..t: 50.00 f.Mt. t:benlof' Also ~pt .tbclt: ,put 'th.reot Yhi.c;:h Un SC1tt.hllrlV of' . Line d:ra'tlll pa:r&lle1 with &tiel eli.u.nt 33.00 Cc!et: ~t:M%'lll of.. &II __~ at: .. z:i'itlt &JlI114 'to, 'the t'oUowill9 deac:rUle<l line: &a1Ji.rlA'ing at: .a poillt on W .nt line of ..ic1 SS~m '33, di.st&l1c ~.50 feet..1lOrt:h of chll SClUl:hwc!at corner of uicl seet,1.oa 33. aa _.wA<! along add Weat l:hwlJ thern:e E&:sterlyat an aAl!lle to "-U' with _14 .,.1: line (aa _...und fnm tIorth to Eastl a 41sUtoee of 434.80 fftt 8QI! theft tenI1zJ.ti.ng'; Al&C1 In<c:'Opt . t:d.angul;ar pueal at" the NoI:t~st conor of the U'ect. her.d,Z! 4a.c:dbed. Mid trianqular pez:c:al bao;1nnillCJ .t tM llItenec:t1on of: lIIai.d $QI,1thft'ly r.19ht of way liaa of" tIw r'li_~ WU'ten a.i1'way eu.piIny &J:Id: a line lkavn psn1le.l 'With and distant 80.0.0 teet: wfter1.y Of. as 1lIlluund at . rllJht .a"ll. to, .-ic1 C\enter11ne D'f the gin line. n.ck of the. KL_ap:11ie.. W:n:tilfi..ld a8II Sguthot'n 1la1l_v' ~ Sallt~l.y and panU.l wid! sa1cl. CIHlterllncl of the 'JI&1n lw u.ek . dutaftOt of 200.OCf_t, thanco Nort__tu'ly to a point; Of! add Kinnesota \i;!~arll adlwa.y OMpIny riqb't .~ 'Wall' lJDII . cliat.anc:e of .200.00 t..t llestely or the point of beq!nniJtq of "1c! _i'd,OIl., .. _sured along' Aic3 SCI'Irtbe:rly ri.g.bt. of vay l.i.M: of 'the J'li1l.l!uClta tfIIct:ft'1l b1~'y Ccm,panyl c,._ Ea5terly to ~ paint; of bequtMlUJr And ..lso _pt that pIIrt thenar dBsrcrlbod <IS tollows. B&cl.Lnninc'l.at 1'M point: of irrt:arMCtI.cn crf a lifte t11:&\tD parallel with and dbtant 150.00 f.aa't f<<)rthe.r1y of. all ,",sasured at: . rilJbt Il.ttgle to. 1::he ~ oh~ihl! t.be A .",1't:b a liJlII drAwn pad1le1 with a.ncl di.st.ant 80.00 feet: West.lt:J'ly af, as _~ &t .. dlJl'lt ~1. tc. .aid "nte.diDll ...r the _b 11M trac:k of the. MiMo&poU.s. Mort.h1ield and SOc.l1:ben M11_" z:1g~ of way .a _ ClCIn.truc:tllcl aClc! opented owr aM: cu::roSJi n.icl and: thence. Of! .n o551l1m111d beari."IJ of 1111020'SO~ alonq saU &l.00 fOO't ptll'aU.1 111M a cliat.anee of 926_.~ f...l:. thllm:e. 57'"Jl'45-"'... cli'l1t.a_ of 200_2] ~t:: <thence, N9'!1'"4Ei'10"'l1'. dutanQ8 of 1.441.00 f_tl 't,,",_ SO'"l]CSO~l!I a t1i.e.ta_ of 91..90 -feet, tlleaee 1IB"J.4Ej"l.o.w a dillt:aMtI ot" 113.00 r-t: t.beaee S,,",lS'50~ a aist:al'lce of U4.00 feet:.I thcll~ }Ie9'"oK':L(l.w.. d1sta1>C':8 at" 149.34 hetl ChotKO South a dil't.afte& of )45.75 fMt; the.~ Qef1ec:t;.l.ng 'to tbe. left donq. tangent!.1 CV%Ye bavinq a ra4ia of 150,00 feu.. delUl. &n;'1e 91'"21'2'-, for a disune. ef 239.17 :teet! t.MItClI _038'31"1:: a a1staftClCl of 29.06 feUI tMnal SO-sE'23-E a.dUt:arl.e$ ot" 10.11 ~et. I'IIOre or less. ta n1d lw =AWn plI1".Ue.1 witt.. .nd 1.59.QO re.t JlQrthody of. a. ~c! at. . a:~ht. e.no;1e 1:0. tbe aboYo <Iesc:z:ibe.d: x.!ne A, the_ Eafte2:'ly alDllg' laW lSC.OO foot parallel lu,e to the ~ Qf beg:1nIl.i1lC1. Ka_ caasad the. _ co Ile. ~yec! .nd ~1::~o!l as ElCHlESSWAY ~~ J'ARKo and. de MRby d<lna'tlt &ncl dcrdi.oetll 1:0 t:he public for the pab1Jc 'lift! fo:ewr tbe ltOacl CI4 lk'dl1l:lJe &Jtd ut1l1ty ea._ats &a shown C1ft 1:lda plat. In w.ltllMS ~ sa1l!l Illt:c!l:r.ae1on&1 Papsr CCl1IlpCIlIy. ttle ~ticMc1 ~at1Ml. has Cll'llUa thesa pnaents to be 3!.qned 1rr J.te ~ offi.ea: .and. its ~ate ..,"'1 to be HftlQnto a:t'f1-" f:t!u ~ day of' ....~ l.97.2 .anc1 ...lei. Intat"Mti.oMl P'lI.9U' balty Co,rpclt'&t..1011. toM ~ .;::;r:::a~.::r.1;/::U4II!ld theM )ml19~L~ be. .~ by .11::.$ r oftice:r end h. CCt'pcntcl seal 1:0 be Mz:.unto .af'f'bed. 1:hia C. E. COULTER a ASSOCWES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS S~c1~ In.'t.rna1:.ional PillpI!l1' COilIrpIIllY ~:2i -Z.r _'J ..:- Ml z: .....y -"~ 1l.-"'fJ! r1.,~ =. ~ M;,~~~';." : {/ ~ EorfI<JOl.ng u.s~nt IfS,S IIClaIowlad;~ beton _ l;his ~ 4&1' at .f:!J~ 197/ ,by L~ B. K'IftI..J- ~ M.. fr FL...,~....... CI'f' :I1l<t.on'nlll:icn.&1. ftper Coapaay, 1:;1\0 ccrrpora't1oQ . 1ZI the. fozwvoJ..nq in8ttWii.llt.. 'In behll of ~ CClI:po%Ilt:1on. .<->....:..~~~~:::'::.:,:-. Rotan ~Go-: ~~ County. ~ r ..:.;..~..,,:'" .' ~l"" .1 ~.- '.0:'". I'Iy CCMIIission e:lrpiru .1 1 1L"t {f;flf' ,.........:.....,..?...._..';ol...\ .I . 'u Ci[~tv j'l~ . ,.. gM5< 0"''''1 ~~~~~~ ~ . - -- ~ ~~;-u:ument was ~~=~~ :~:--;:.1ty ~~&t1.o11~.~fCO%;::e~ n-.! 11l t_ ~~Y.ia'=: ~b..~ ":;~ __-u.n. ,~~-:.:~~~:~~i~:~;:, ~~ ...........,,'.~ <::~,..... !'""';~ '1',:/,;:. t!lcUry P\1blle. CQWfI:y. ~'ij~...L..L..... . .. My coaW.ss1on npi;'e__ .56_ I , I hereby c:e.rt.l.ty 'th.t.: I nClVtl s:un.~ and pllot.eed tM propsrty <lftcrUlIU' CtI th1a pJ..t.1: .. ZXIIR2SSIaY IWn:lmIl.~ I'UJC; tl:IA~ thb 111 a eoaact. representation. CIl said surMYI t.ha't .aU dht.l~s aA ctn"nc:t1y she- ia. f'ee.t: aru! hUll&'d-ths of . !aa'tl t.bat aU ~ts hInHr been correet.l',. i'loced in t~ 9:t:'DCDd atI Shewn, t:be.t: the outs1<<e bouncIuy linee a!! c:on~y 4uitMteCI. 6TA'J"S OF 1'1~ ~~O:o~~t: \all Miknaw.1eclgec! bofon .. thts ~ day of --.JU,f,.,'1" 1.91~, by JoM A. "wl:ilcm.. LI.nt:I ~. P'rlInk L Lanz. Jr. . Klrllfeaata 1,1.919 ~rcoTA~':~lbtt~ ~~ HEI:Nu C;,"'jljHf:SorA~ ~","".",~~~;;n,:,~ l..'~ i .,J, GQtl)2R VALIZY, JalQItSOTA 1.'h.ls plat of ~T :ot1'EIUVt.'rIONlII. PARK _a .~4 tlM .cc:egt.ecl~bT 'the cOWiCil of' the C1t:y of. Go14tn VIllley, ~eou., at . %e9Ula= tac'cUng tberoafhe1.l!l t1l1. ~ clay of A ~_ ~. r 151- .~ ern <:Ol:l!CJL (2 jPU'ZR VALIBY. KmEsom ,By "4~, ~ Kaycu' t~~~~ Clork "'. F:tNUlCE DIV%Itmr, Henaeplll COUJI.l:y, /II1nnesota. I her-bV cet.dfy 'thot 'tb.e.n1 <<ro no 4eli....queflt tnes foI: till. Ylllan p:ior to 1S1lY of ~____ 191_. foz land dellC'Uea en Uds :plat:. tl&t.e4 t:his_ V9z:non 'r. HOppe. D1rac:t.C1'. by ,.." Cle%k ~PIlCCD1JRtYSmtVt:YOlt Puz:suillrt. to CMpt.er 610. MiruteSOt.& Laws of 1'69. th1. glllt M5 been app!:o...c 1::his _ day of .191_. Al-ver: R. ~, Kellnel'in Ccwrt1 5une)'O:' CotlN'n'ltBCORIlSR. __pil:l CCItDlt.y. Id.NIoe.8Ota I benrby certify tb.t tile wi.t1\11'1 ,p.1a:t of ZlCHl.ESSWPr.Y IJrmp.P'TIOlll1oL ~ W5 fn.d tor record in tMe oUre. thie. u.y of 197.t o'clock. H, and waa J:eecmSec1: iJl IIOOk of' Plat;lI, i'iilI~ .rA tJwt the 'b<<l copL<<s _re ~ ,,1tb-ihe 'Iu1Cial,p~Wlire ~to'be ttue &nc! conoet ~Il' thenof. - Weyne 10. ,JOi'<.JIsen. ~y ~r. by tlepq~y t<J :x: ::r: H tJj H ..., tJj SfiEET I OF 2. SHEETS ..; EXHIBIT B ;;!; Ki w lei c (,!) ... (t ~OO it f ~ ~ ... ~ d CllQ: il ~ ll' z ::> Z ~ ~ .. li d ffillJ II " " :z ~~ ,. 0 l! !i z 0 ~o .. !!i ga:: ~2 : ~ ~ III !DO ~C( ~ l; 0...1 ~ ~ ::l .. . L LSlo<J,'I. 'ON ':loa NOS10 'g 0,101;) 55 'ON I , , , . . ':!s ~ I"" QO'O"I'''' I I , I ,l,i'/Mli9IH :U'I.L5: ( .WMH 91H '1V1~OI~31M " . ~ I ~~ :1~' I~ ,~ ~:li :;~ 3, :::.:::: a:: ~ ...J <t Z 0 \ ~ 'll . Z . . ~ ,:.\ a:: ~ ..' W i \ l- I- ;; \ ~ .. J Z 1i ~'. ': ... \ :i ~ ~ \ :J ~ , ::If .. c Jf ~ .. (/) , ~ . W .:It \ :' 0:: ,il ~ a. % ) x \ " W 't ' . , \ c,' l , I ~:S:J"-- I . I ~;: " ,..,1.95...95 Q~ .'flIl') ...~ 00'1 'loli 1."1.;;:......1 :)9 ':JHi.' : .,- ~ I ~ f I; ~ .p _ ,1 '1 ,.' t ,~li L,J~j 1'1 ''tIIQII'J. \~ ''';>>'5 ~o ?/'fIN ~o "'Q .w ,"" H~1I0WI' alley M City Administration/Council 763-593-8014 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting April 13, 2010 Agenda Item 7. Organizing Local Businesses Prepared By Jeanne Andre, Assistant City Manager Summary At its February Workshop the Council identified organizing local businesses as one of its goals. A number of Council Members expressed interest in being involved in this activity. Further discussion is necessary to determine the direction of this initiative.