Loading...
10-11-10 PC AgendaAGENDA Planning Commission Regular Meeting Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers Monday, October 11, 2010 7 pm 1. Approval of Minutes a. August 9, 2010 Regular Planning Commission Meeting 2. Informal .Public Hearing -Planned Unit Development Amendment - Preliminary Design Plan - 6800 Wayzata Boulevard -Menards - PU-75, Amendment #3 a. Applicant: Menard, Inc. b. Address: 6800 Wayzata Blvd. c. Purpose: The applicant is proposing the replacement of the existing Menards store with a new 2-story Menards home improvement center. 3. Short Recess 4. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings 5. Other Business a. Election of Officers 6. Adjournment p This documentis available in alternate formats upon a 72-hour request. Please call 763-593-800b (TTti': 763-593-3968) to make a request: Examples of alternate formats n,;+ nclucie large i~rint, electronic, Braille, audiocassette, elC. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 9, 2010 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, August 9, 2010. Vice Chair Waldhauser called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Cera, Eck, Kluchka, McCarty, Schmidgall and Waldhauser. Also present was City Planner Joe Hogeboom and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Chair Keysser was absent 1. Approval of Minutes July 26, 2010 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Eck referred to the fifth paragraph on page 3 and noted that the word "prejudice" should be "prejudiced". McCarty referred to the eighth paragraph on page 2 and noted the word "and" should be added after the word "neighborhood" in the last sentence. MOVED by Eck, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the July 26, 2010 minutes with the above noted corrections. 2. Informal Public Hearing -Conditional Use Permit - 2530 Winnetka Ave N - CU-129 Applicant: Semper Development, Ltd. Address: 2530 Winnetka Ave. N. Purpose: To allow the proposed Walgreens store to have adrive-through pharmacy window in the Commercial Zoning District. Hogeboom stated that Semper Development, representing Walgreens, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the proposed new Walgreens (to be located at 2530 Winnetka Avenue North) to have adrive-through pharmacy window. He noted that all drive- through window proposals in Golden Valley require a Conditional Use Permit. Hogeboom stated that the applicant has also been to the Board of Zoning Appeals twice. The original request was for a variance from front yard setback requirements to allow the proposed building to be located closer to Winnetka Avenue than allowed. He stated that the Board wasn't comfortable allowing the building to be located closer to the street so they tabled the applicant's request and asked the applicant to come back with a plan that would meet the front yard setback requirements. Per the Board's recommendation, the applicant came back to the Board of Zoning appeals with a new plan that met the front yard setback requirements but required a variance from the required number of parking stalls. A variance for the reduction in the required number of parking stalls was granted. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 9, 2010 Page 2 Hogeboom stated that Hennepin County has reviewed this proposal and they don't feel that this proposed Walgreens store will impact traffic enough to warrant any improvements, however the County will be taking some additional right-of-way from the Walgreens site in order to elongate Winnetka Avenue's left turn lane onto westbound Medicine Lake Road. He added that Walgreens' original plans showed a driveway along the south side of their property and the neighboring property that would access Rhode Island Avenue. He explained that it was ultimately decided that regular traffic patterns on the site and emergency vehicle access would work without that driveway access so it has been removed from the plans. This driveway access would have crossed the south 20 feet of the VFW property. Eck referred to the City Engineer's staff report and asked if it can be assumed that the references to the access road to Rhode Island Avenue are no longer valid. Hogeboom reiterated that that the access driveway to Rhode Island Avenue has been removed from the proposal so any references in the City Engineer's report regarding the access to Rhode Island Avenue can be ignored. Cera referred to the site plan and noted that the northern most driveway shows a right turn only arrow painted on the ground and it also shows the installation of a sign that says no right turn. He questioned if the sign should really say no left turn. Hogeboom agreed that the sign should say no left turn. Cera questioned if there is any contamination on the site given that there are automotive uses currently located on the property. Hogeboom suggested that the applicant respond to the environmental issues. Waldhauser noted that she hasn't seen any comments regarding lighting on the site. Hogeboom stated that this proposal will be subject to the City's lighting regulations. John Kohler, Semper Development, referred to the site plan and noted that the drive- through window will be located on the east side of the building. Kluchka asked if there will be adequate signage from the street showing where the drive- through is located. Kohler explained the traffic patterns on the site and said Walgreens would be willing to put a directional sign on Winnetka Avenue near the southern most driveway. Cera asked Kohler about the environmental issues on this site. Kohler said he is not aware of any contamination issues and added that an environmental study will be done as a part of the purchase of this property. Waldhauser asked if the existence of adrive-through reduces the parking needs. Kohler said yes and stated that approximately 10% of their business goes through the drive- through. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 9, 2010 Page 3 Kluchka asked who will own the property. Kohler said Semper Development will own the property and Walgreens will have along-term lease and Walgreens will do all of the maintenance and management of the property. Kluchka referred to an ex-Walgreens store in Rogers which is now a liquor store and asked the applicant about their building re-use policies. Kohler explained that the building in Rogers was never a Walgreens store and that the City of Rogers copied the look of a Walgreens design. He said the re-use of buildings depends on what type of use is going in to the building. Kluchka asked about Semper's approach to increasing pedestrian visibility as well as bicycle visibility and access. Kohler noted that the building is as close to the street as possible in order to provide better pedestrian access and added that it is Walgreens policy to provide bike racks as shown on the site plan. Schmidgall asked what the store will look like. Kohler referred to a preliminary sketch of the proposed building and said the building would be brick on all sides. Schmidgall noted that Walgreens stores seem taller than they need to be. Kohler stated that a lot of the height is used to screen and block the noise from the rooftop equipment. Schmidgall asked about the Walgreens store in the Spring Gate shopping center. Kohler said there are currently no plans to do anything at that location. He added that Walgreens stores typically serve an area of approximately one mile. Eck asked if the businesses presently located at this site are going to re-locate. Kohler said he doesn't know the details about the businesses relocating. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Bill Norberg, VFW Commander, 2525 Nevada Avenue North, stated that in the original proposal there was a driveway out to Rhode Island Avenue located on the VFW property. He said it was VFW's intent to fight that driveway because there is a garage located in the proposed driveway easement area. He said without that driveway as part of the proposal, the VFW has no objections to this project. Carl Hoffstedt, 2450 Valders Avenue North, said he thinks a new building will be an improvement and he doesn't have any issues with the proposed drive-through, but he is concerned about lighting being aimed at the residential area. He questioned why Walgreens selected this location when the existing businesses seem viable and added that the small restaurant to the south seems to be a more logical location. He said he assumes that there has been coordination between City staff and Hennepin County regarding traffic issues. Victoria Hopponen, 2400 Valders Avenue North, said she can see the lights from the car wash and she is concerned about having more lights shining on the residential area. She also questioned why Walgreens selected this location and why they are taking away businesses that have been there for years when they could go across the street to the Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 9, 2010 Page 4 Midland Shopping Center instead. She asked if Walgreens knows they are building on a swamp and asked if they are going to use pilings during the construction which will create a lot of noise. Grimes explained that the City's lighting ordinance is a lot stricter than it used to be so he doesn't feel the lighting will be an issue. In fact, he thinks there will be a substantial improvement. Schmidgall said his understanding of the lighting ordinance is that there can be no glare from lights at the property line. Grimes agreed and added that the City has little control over the street lighting in the area because it is a county road. Waldhauser said she would like the developer to be aware of the neighbor's concerns about lighting. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public hearing. Kluchka asked Kohler to address Walgreens property selection process. Kohler said Walgreens looked at several properties in the area and added that Walgreens stores are tending to move out of shopping centers so that is why the Midland Shopping Center won't work. Waldhauser said Walgreens decision to buy this property and the owner's decision to sell the property were their business decisions and not really the Planning Commission's business. Waldhauser said the staff summary and the factors used in considering a Conditional Use Permit request make sense. There isn't a similar business nearby, there is very little impact and visually it will be an improvement. She said she hopes the landscape plan includes trees and not just shrubs. Kluchka recommended that there be adequate signage installed regarding the location of the drive-through and that the walkway leading to the public sidewalk be extended and widened to create a plaza feel. MOVED by Eck, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit request to allow the proposed Walgreens store to have adrive-through pharmacy window in the Commercial Zoning District subject to the following conditions: 1. The site plan shall become a part of this approval. 2. The conditions found in City Engineer Jeff Oliver's memo dated June 21, 2010 shall become a part of this approval. 3. The conditions found in Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson's memo dated June 7, 2010 shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage shall meet the requirements of Section 4.20 of City Code. 5. All future improvements to the building shall meet the City's Building Code requirements. 6. All other applicable local, state and federal requirements shall be met at all times. 7. Failure to comply with any of the terms of this permit shall be grounds for revocation. 8. Adequate signage regarding the location of the drive-through shall be installed near the southern most driveway. 9. The walkway between the public sidewalk along Winnetka Avenue and the store shall be extended and widened to provide for better pedestrian access. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 9, 2010 Page 5 3. Informal Public Hearing -Minor Subdivision (Lot Consolidation) - 2530 Winnetka Ave N - SU14-12 Applicant: Semper Development, Ltd. Address: 2530 Winnetka Ave. N. Purpose: The Lot Consolidation would allow the three existing lots to be consolidated into one lot. Hogeboom explained that upon review of Semper Development's Conditional Use Permit request it was discovered that the existing building is located on three lots of record so in order to construct a new building the applicant needs to consolidate the three lots into one. He discussed City Engineer, Jeff Oliver's staff report regarding this proposal and added that Hennepin County has also reviewed it and it is viewed by staff to be a housekeeping item. Grimes asked the applicant if the easement along the south side of the property that was originally proposed to be a driveway will still exist. John Kohler, Applicant, explained that the easement in question is really a lot itself and it will stay as it is. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Carl Hoffstedt, 2450 Valders Avenue North, said it sounds like Walgreens has yet to purchase the property. Hogeboom said it is his understanding that there is a purchase agreement in place. Hoffstedt asked if the applicant will have to come back to the Planning Commission for plan review once the property is purchased. Waldhauser said no and explained that the next step in the process is the City Council review. Hoffstedt said there is little opportunity for residents to get involved in the plan review process. Grimes said residents are welcome to look at the plans. Bill Norberg, VFW Commander, 2525 Nevada Avenue North, said the VFW strongly opposes the easement along the south property line to be used for driveway access to Rhode Island Avenue. Seeing and hearingno one else wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public hearing. MOVED by McCarty, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision (Lot Consolidation) at 2530 Winnetka Avenue North subject to the following conditions: 1. The conditions found in City Engineer Jeff Oliver's memo dated June 21, 2010 shall become a part of this approval. 2. The conditions found in Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson's memo dated June 7, 2010 shall become a part of this approval Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 9, 2010 Page 6 3. The conditions found in found in Director of Transportation and County Engineer James Grube's letter dated June 15, 2010 shall become a part of this approval. 4. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. --Short Recess-- 4. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Cera reported on the July 27, 2010 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting where Walgreens was granted a variance to allow fewer than the required number of parking spaces. He stated that it was the Board's desire not to grant them a variance from the front yard setback requirements but rather from the parking requirements. 5. Other Business Hogeboom stated that there has been a ruling from the Minnesota Supreme Court that appears to make granting variances more difficult. He said he has asked the City Attorney to write an opinion on the ruling and will update the. Commissioners and the Board of Zoning Appeals in the future. Kluchka asked about the proposed Menard's project. Hogeboom said staff is still waiting to receive more information from Menards before their project can proceed. 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:17 pm. Lester Eck, Secretary Golden Valley Date: October 6, 2010 Planning 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: Informal Public Hearing-Preliminary PUD Plan for Amendment No. 3 to Menards PUD No. 75 (6800 Wayzata Blvd)-Menard, Inc., Applicant BACKGROUND Menard, Inc., represented by Aaron Morrissey, has requested a third amendment to the Menards PUD No. 75. The purpose of the amendment is to allow for the demolition of the existing store and the reconstruction of a two-level store on the same site. The plan is to stop operation of this store early in 2011 and build a new store that will open in 2012. According to City files, the existing store is about 128,000 sq. ft. in area on one level. There is also a warehouse along the north property line along with storage of product outside. This warehouse is not heated. The proposal is to construct a two story store with about 250,000 sq. ft. of floor space on two levels. There would also be a 42,000 sq. ft. warehouse along the north property line. There would also be outside storage of product north of the store that is accessed from Hampshire Ave. New to this store is a garden center with both indoor and outdoor display areas located along the east side of the building. This garden center will eliminate the need to sell Christmas trees and landscape material in the front parking lot. The site would have 370 parking spaces or 23 more than the existing store. The property is currently guided on the General Land Use Plan Map for Mixed Uses. This Mixed Use category was created by the City several years ago after the I-394 Corridor Study was completed. As a result of the Study, the City Council created a new I-394 Mixed Use zoning district with three subdistricts. The Menard property is located in Subdistricts B and C. The front (south) third of the property is within Subdistrict C that permits high rise structures up to 10 stories. The rear two thirds (north) portion of the property is within Subdistrict B that permits mid rise structures up to 6 stories in height. However, since the Menards property is located within an existing PUD, it has been determined by the City Attorney that the applicant may amend the PUD to allow for a new Menards store on the site. According to the City Attorney, they are not subject to the requirements found in the Mixed Use zoning district. They have the right to amend the existing PUD to allow for the rebuilding of a similar type of store on the site. The review of the General Land Use Plan Map and Zoning Map indicates that all the property north of Laurel Ave. is designated on the General Land Use Plan Map for Open Space (Laurel Ave. ponds). North of the ponds, there is a single family neighborhood. The properties to the west and east of Menards are guided for Mixed Use and zoned I-394 Mixed Use. Across I-394 is St. Louis Park where the land uses are commercial or office. The PUD was first issued to Menards in1997. Menards has been at this location since 1981. The building was previously a car dealership and converted to the Menards store. When Menards purchased the property, it was zoned Industrial. The zoning changed to Mixed Use several years ago. Within the Industrial zoning district, lumber yards and building supply stores were considered a permitted use. Menards subleased a portion of the building to other users, including COMB (catalog/warehouse business), Zeo's computers, a patio furniture store and MGM Liquor Warehouse. At the time of the 1997 PUD application, only MGM sublet space. At that time, Menards was told if they wanted to expand their store, they would have to get a PUD that would permit two uses on the same parcel. Also, the City insisted that the PUD phase out the MGM store by 2001. In 1997, the Menards store was about 104,000 sq. ft., not including the unheated warehouse. In 1998, Menards received its first PUD amendment in order to permit a reduction in the size of the building additions permitted by the original PUD. (The additions permitted by the original PUD were not started at the time the 1998 amendment was issued.) The 1998 PUD amendment permitted Menards to expand to a building of 128,191 sq. ft. In 2009, Menards received a second PUD amendment to permit the use of a portion of their parking lot for a plant but in order to sell live plans from April to September of each year. The plant but was located at about the same location of the Christmas tree sales area. With the new store, there will be no temporary sales within the main parking lot. DESCRIPTION OF PUD PROCESS and PUD ELIGIBILITY There are two stages of approval for PUD approvals with the exception of minor PUD amendments that may be approved solely by the City Council. This amendment proposed by Menards is not a minor amendment so it must be approved by the two stage process. This is the first or preliminary PUD plan stage. The purpose of this stage is two-fold: to give broad concept approval to the proposal, and to call out issues that must be addressed in detail as the proposal moves ahead to the Final PUD Plan, or the final stage of approval. Preliminary plan approval does not guarantee that a proposal will become reality. It gives an applicant some assurance of being on the right track, and some guidance on how to proceed. In the case of the Planning Commission in particular, the limitation of the preliminary plan approval is clearly laid out. City Code Section 11.55 Subd. 5(C) states that: The Planning Commission shall hold an informal public hearing and consider the application for consistency with the Intent and Purpose provisions and other PUD requirements and principles and standards adhered to in the City. The Planning Commission's report to the Council shall include recommended changes, conditions, or modifications. 2 PUDs are regulated under City Code Section 11.55. In this case, Menards is included within an existing PUD that has been amended twice. Since it is an existing PUD, it has already been determined that it is considered to be eligible to be a PUD and can amended with approval of the City Council. It has been determined by staff that Menards has presented all information that is needed for consideration of the Preliminary PUD plan by the City. This information is a part of the information attached to this memo. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The proposal indicates that the existing Menards structure and site will be demolished. This means that the buildings will be removed and the parking lots removed as shown on the demolition plan. After the site is cleared, Menards plans to construct the buildings shown on the attached site plan dated September 8, 2010. The main store has a building footprint approximately the same size as the existing building (about 125,000 sq. ft.). However, the new store will be two levels with 218,000 sq. ft. of floor space. In addition, the site will have a 42,000 sq. ft. warehouse along the north side of the lot. This warehouse is for the storage of materials sold to customers. The back area will be accessed through the yard gate along Hampshire Ave. The new store also has a yard and garden center that is located along the east side of the store. The two level store has been chosen for this site because the 12.4 acre site is considered small for a new Menards store. The two level design allows for the store area to be expanded by about 100,000 sq. ft. The proposed store is a carbon copy of the Menards store that is located in St. Paul at University Ave. and Prior Ave. I have been to that store many times and find it to function well. The two level store was chosen for that site because of the small site. The information that has been submitted by Menards gives the information and background needed to review the site. There are two memos that are attached from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, and Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson regarding their review of the site. The recommendations from each memo will become part of the recommendation for approval of the preliminary PUD plan. Planning staff has several concerns that need to be highlighted as part of this review. They will be addressed in the following paragraphs: PARKING-The size of the store has been increased by about 100,000 sq. ft. but the size of the parking lot has been increased by only 23 parking stalls to a total of 376 spaces. According to the City's parking code, over 700 spaces would be required to meet the parking standard. Because Menards has been in this location since 1981, the City does have experience with the parking needed for this type of store. Based on discussions City staff has had with Menards, staff will recommend the amount of parking indicated on the site plan (376 spaces). Staff thinks that the layout of the parking is better than the existing parking lot and that the limiting of access points to two driveways from Wayzata Blvd. will make it safer and better functioning lot. However, staff will recommend that if there is inadequate parking on the site evidenced by illegal on-street parking or parking in unauthorized locations within the parking lot, the City will require that additional parking be created within the outside yard area by eliminating some of the display or storage areas. 3 The amount of additional parking necessary shall be determined by the Director of Planning and Development. LANDSCAPING-The new site has essentially the same amount of landscaping as the existing site. However, there are fewer trees on the site due to the creation of bio-filtration basins along the setback areas along Market St., Wayzata Blvd. and Hampshire Ave. Due to the nature of the bio-filtration basins, no trees can be planted in them. As stated in the City Engineer's memo, Menards is required to meet the Basset Creek Water Management Commission's Level 1 standards for water quality. The bio-retention basins help meet these high standards. With the same amount of impervious surface today as there will be with the new plan, the Level 1 standards are met. At the current time, the site does not come close to meeting Level 1 standards because the great majority of the runoff is directed into the storm sewer without any treatment. BUILDING DESIGN-The proposed new buildings are typical for a new Menards. The front of the building facing Wayzata Blvd. is proposed to be made of precast concrete wall panels with a buff aggregate and brick imprint finish. The standard green used by Menards will be used for accent colors. The other sides of the buildings will be precast concrete wall panels with a wide rack finish. Staff would like to see that the rear and two sides of the buildings have similar precast concrete wall panels to the front help improve the visual appearance of the buildings. This is particularly critical along the Hampshire Ave. and Market St. sides that are visible from those two streets. The building will be taller than the existing Menards. As shown on the plans, the building will be up to 36 ft. in height. However, this is much less height than is now permitted in this area by the Mixed Use zoning district (either 6 or 10 stories). The rear of the site will be screened from view by the warehouse building that will be constructed along the north property line parallel to the railroad tracks. The rear wall of the warehouse building will be about 26 ft. high and provide screening from Laurel Ave. similar to the existing fence that now screens the Menards rear yard. Menards is also proposing a 14 ft. high treated lumber fence around the outside storage yard area to screen it from view from the east and west. This is the same height fence that now exists on the site. SIGNAGE-Staff has met with the City Attorney and Menards about signage for this redeveloped property. Menards will be leaving the existing pylon sign along Wayzata Blvd. "as is". The sign is considered to be nonconforming but it can remain as long as it is not moved or expanded. Menards will meet the sign code requirements for the remainder of the site. On the existing building there is now a total of 706 sq. ft. of wall signage. Menards will reduce this to 382 sq. ft. of wall signage on the new building. Staff encourages this net reduction in signage for the site. Menards believes that the reduced signage will still give them good visibility. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the preliminary PUD plan for Menards, PUD No. 75, Amendment No. 3. The proposed redevelopment of the site will result in the construction of a new two-level store with an additional 100,000 sq. ft. of building space. However, the site plan does not show an increase in the amount of impervious surface from the existing 11.2 acres. The proposed site will have the exact same imperious surface area. (The total site 4 size is 12.4 acres.) In addition, the development will meet the Level 1 water quality standards established by the Basset Creek Water Management Commission resulting in a benefit to the water bodies downstream. The recommendation of approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These plans were prepared for Menards and include the following: existing pylon sign, front, rear, left, right and wrought iron fence elevations, warehouse elevations, land survey, grading, drainage and erosion control plan, demolition plan and utility plan. 2. All recommendations and requirements set out in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development and dated October 5, 2010 shall become a part of this approval. 3. A final landscape plan shall be submitted with the General Plan of Development and be reviewed and approved by the City's Environmental Coordinator. 4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code. The existing pylon sign existing on the site may remain but cannot be moved or expanded. 5. All recommendations and requirements set out in the memo from Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development, and dated September 21, 2010 shall become a part of this approval. 6. The precast panels on the east, west and north sides of the building shall be the same buff aggregate and brick stamped design as the panels facing Wayzata Blvd. 7. If the amount of parking on the site is inadequate as determined by the City Manager, Menards will take immediate steps to convert a portion of the outside yard area to the north or east of the store building to create additional parking. Evidence of inadequate parking may be shown by customers parking on-street, number of cars parked in the parking lot, and cars not parked in designated spaces within the parking lot. 8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal and local ordinances, regulations or laws with authority over this development. Attachments: Location map (1 page) Aerial photo (1 page) Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, dated October 5, 2010 (5 pages) Memo from Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson dated September 21, 2010 (2 pages) Applicant's Narrative, dated September 9, 2010 (3 pages) Exhibit "B" Variances and Explanations (3 pages) PUD Permit for Menards Addition PUD No. 75, Amendment No. 2 (3 pages) Preliminary Plans (7 oversized pages) 5 ~~i ~ i ' taa ~fn ~ 30 Li o n s F a t k _- - 7i1i0 7tW0 49a0 X00 ~ _ ~W... 30 35 t ~ ~ 75 ` ' S0 55 c J 110 ' d. ~ 50 ,~ 115 I ~~ C2 i3t1~ ~ t5 €t5 Z +s; ~? 115 110 y 1!5 110 ~ ~ 135 ~ 13CI ~z- X55 i , S0 135 ~ ~, +C 135 is1 ,, 133 150 . 130 , 1 . xss ss0 sss 150 1~.o ins ' 210 '~ -~ ~~ 1t5 ~ 215 310 ~ 215 210 m 1~. 195 -- - }23d yr ., _ J 135 .~35 ~0 210 x15; __, zso ~ ~~. ~ 255 150 255 2'50 / 235 , ~ ~~ z~s- 1~ ctn~rrrn~ ro _ _ - _ West Ring Pond , ~_,~ ~ ` 1 Y ~-- `~ zs ~ + £asi Rfrrg Pond `I L.turt:a Ae~t: Gr~~7b eit (E & W Ring P~nd~)__~ -~ - ~ ` ~ _ _ ___ -J -=- - ~ ~ in5 i1o ~~' ~'~asas ~t~~ i10 I I I ~ 6530 64545324 63Tt/ ---.._. ~ ~ +15 /~40 650b 15 l ESfERNAVE' °°r ~ Yet.. 1 _ ~~ ~ ~LENWCX?6AV 28667fl 6630~856Dt55#tl 19d 1ti5 ~-; 105 g~ i~ ~~ < 12iD GORTtAWM.CIR_N . , li0{~fit5 I10 ~ 115 ~sss- ~ 6s25 ~D° €~ ~,~ 125 1~5 a 6~65~16sae asi~ s~0 i~ ` 35 2€~0 _ 224 28 L'ORTULWNt.3R 5 !R5 ___ ~ ~ 6655655 6615' '6555 653516515 I634564~' 5 ' 1 _ . ! __ 1 ~ ~`_ ~ 320 515 Subject Property: c~oncij 6800 Wayzata Blvd. -- '~ ~ ~° -- ~ numo~ma~us~ gcrxomsc~aa~ is Ys 2~ ~ ~,4~ ~~ ~ -_ e ~ ' ~s -``~'~~-.t ~ _ - ~~ j ~~ Cortlawn Pond 1 ~. ~ sis `+ <~} L;,urel Ave Greenbelt (Cortlawn Pond ) '~ Laurel Ave Greenbelt (E & W Ring Ponds) t f Eas[ Rinq Pand LS *~ ~ ~ ~ `yf fft ~ ~ ~ i ~`a.~ ------ _ - I , 1 , f ~ ;~- ~ ~ Q ~'~ ~ = Subject Property: .. ~ - s.~ .. _` ` "~~'~~ °~''~~ 6800 Wayzata Blvd. _ .. .. tl~ _ _- - - - ~- - ~a. - ~ _ _ _ ,~ . , „~ ~ „~,~~,~ , p ~ ,~ .~ i 4k' - - . I ~rT.- a~.ii- ` 701 fkf ~ F. ~ t ~~ 69~ ' ~~~~ ~- ,. ~.. ~ ~~, . E ~ may,, t- i ,R, ~y„° i s _"t ° t+~~~.. f. i 721 u '. C' ' 2BfYlM~~Flt ~~~Nfh'.. N I t e- _ *k .ryw~ F, tMrfY~l~K~ ~, 44••=,'q /. *`,. H '~.. ~ ~ 'r~ -. ~ K~s`_~.°v..., ,~ t`om' ~ °RtN ~' FI N Y:F fN-.. ~ I 7~ n "R.. !' FKtttl z"a ~ ~r e • _ ~ ~ `"~ ~ F~ tF rf~t F ~ t ., :. ~ p~~~Y I _ _ -,' ~; ~ ; x .. [~ ,+f • ~.~,.~~~,~! ~- ~ ,~ ~ ~fh M, M r 6600 _ t b~, ,3 '. tr`R' ,. r . a. - __.~.._ i'. r. -°. .w 'V 4 r a:&`' F . f '. 9D5 ~. BSD i- ~~ I ,,~.. F - ~ .. ., ~ ' 6925 *. ~ _ '. "'~_ 6953 ~.' ~ ~ 4 _ L r ; - ~- ~ • ~ ~ fHp~r iFr~4~ 1if NAM 90D r T. ;. ~ _~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~* '5--: ~ ~_~~! (off ,. ~ ~ Fw 901. f~ ~ -- - ~ r~ ~'~ «..~ ~'~ ~ k ' ~ ~'.~ ~ i -, _ r r j !`r ~'~ , ~ f r w i _ P 69T Orr ~'~ ,,% •"-~ ',~ / 6 : ~ p +! ~ ~ ~}~ 6660E r tr a, :' F (3 ~ ~ ~ 6934 ^ I r ~ :~ ~ ~~ ~ .{ ~... ~; ' rT _ 6620 ,- ~ ~ i. f . •- _ f w i ~ ti ®r _ -- -~+ ~ _ _'~~-~~_; _-~ (_ J ~y ,fin ~ ~ `~ ~1' ~- I `. +~ ~,,..~ !K! .-, .. ,n ,, _.~._-._.. f w. .. ~ ~I r ° / .. «"- __. - R - ^ - __ a.. .__ -- _ f o~rw , _ _ `Golden Valley Date: October 5, 2010 Public Works 763.593.8030 / 763.593.3988 (fax) To: l~Vlark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Subject: Planned Unit Development 75, Menards Amendment #3 Public Works staff has reviewed the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment # 3 submitted by Menards, Inc. for the construction of a new two-story home improvement center at the location of their existing store. This site is located at 6800 Wayzata Boulevard, which is south of Laurel Avenue, west of Hampshire Avenue South, and north of the I-394 Frontage. Road (Wayzata Boulevard). Site Plan Access to the existing Menards store is provided by three driveways onto Wayzata Boulevard, and two driveways onto Hampshire Avenue, one of which is the access point to the outdoor yard area on the north side of the building. In addition, there is an existing emergency access driveway onto Market Street on the west side of the building. This emergency access is currently controlled with a gate to limit the driveway use to emergency vehicles. The proposed site plan includes elimination of one of the driveways onto Wayzata Boulevard and relocation of the two remaining driveways away from Hampshire Avenue and Market Street. This relocation will improve sight lines and conflicts between turning vehicles and is an overall safety improvement to the public streets. As discussed above, the parking lot access onto Hampshire Avenue is being eliminated as part of the reconstruction. Therefore, the only access onto Hampshire Avenue is into the yard area. This yard area is the location of semi-truck deliveries and customer pick up of large merchandise. The gate and security building for the yard entrance are proposed to be approximately 65 feet from the west curb line of Hampshire Avenue providing limited stacking area for vehicles entering the yard. While the proposed construction of a right turn lane for southbound Hampshire Avenue will provide some staging space, there are no accommodations for northbound traffic turning left into the yard, which may result in queues on Hampshire Avenue, which is posted as No Parking on both sides of the street. Based upon this discussion, staff recommends that the gate G:\Developments -Private\Menards\Preliminary PUD Amendment Review # 2.doc and security building be located as far west as possible to maximize the number of vehicles that can stage for entrance. The proposed site plan also includes reconstructing the emergency driveway onto Market Street in its current location, which is acceptable as shown. All work within the right-of-way for Wayzata Boulevard, Hampshire Avenue, and Market Street must be performed in accordance with the City's Right-of-Way Management Ordinance and City construction standards and specifications. This includes pedestrian ramps, commercial driveway aprons, sidewalk, subgrade correction, curb and gutter, and pavement. The developer will be required to obtain aRight-of-Way Permit for this work. Utilities There is adequate capacity in the City's sanitary sewer and water distribution systems that currently provide service to the site to accommodate the proposed land uses. There is one existing sanitary sewer service extended into the subject property. The existing service must be removed from the property line to the existing Menards building and capped at the property line as part of the site demolition. The remaining portion of the sanitary sewer service is subject to the City's Inflow and Infiltration (I & I) Ordinance. In order to become compliant with the code, the developer must have the existing sanitary sewer service inspected by the City and make any repairs deemed necessary following inspection. The I&I Certificate of Compliance must be obtained prior to occupancy of the new building. The existing water services for consumption and fire protection are extended into the site from Hampshire Avenue. The demolition plan indicates that these service lines will be removed, but the Utility Plan does not include the installation of new services. The developer must include the location of the new service lines on the Utility Plan submitted for the final PUD approval, and must utilize the existing service lines if they are sized appropriately. The Fire Department has identified the need for hydrants for fire protection within the development site. Based upon this need, Public Works staff is recommending that the existing 8-inch water service on the east side of the property be extended to the west in front of the new building to connect to the City watermain in Market Street. A minimum of two fire hydrants must be installed in the front parking lot. The location of these hydrants must be shown on the Utility Plan submitted for final PUD approval. City records indicate that an 8-inch diameter water line was extended under the railroad tracks and into the subject property near its northwest corner in 1988. This service line must be shown on the Utility Plan. In addition, the developer must install a fire hydrant in the yard area north of the building utilizing this water service. The location of the hydrant is subject to the approval of the City and must be shown on the Utility Plan submitted for final PUD approval. G:\Developments - Private\Menards\Preliminary PUD Amendment Review # 2.doc The new watermain and fire hydrants to be installed as part of this redevelopment will be owned and maintained by the developer. The developer will be required to enter into a maintenance agreement for this watermain. This agreement will be prepared by the City and recorded by the City, and the agreement must be signed by the developer prior to forwarding the PUD Amendment to the City Council for final approval. The developer will be required to obtain the appropriate sewer and water permits from the Golden Valley Building Department for installation of the sanitary sewer and water services to the new building. Stormwater Management The property being redeveloped is located within the Sweeney Lake subwatershed of Bassett Creek. The redevelopment is therefore subject to the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission's (BCWMC) Requirements for Improvements and Development Proposals, which requires water quality treatment be provided to Level 1 standards. The developer must submit the plans for this project to the BCWMC for its review and comments. The developer must modify the plans in accordance with the BCWMC comments and submit the final plans to the City for its records. Due to the size of the property and the lack of land availability for a traditional water quality pond, the developer is proposing to meet the water quality goals for the site using alternative methods of treatment that are included in the BCWMC water quality standards. The proposed alternative methods include "bio-filtration basins" and proprietary below ground "water quality units," or sedimentation basins. The stormwater runoff from the parking lot in front of the building currently leaves the site with no nutrient and sediment removal. The proposed plans include surface drainage of the parking lot to the perimeter, where it will drain into the proposed bio- filtration basins. These basins will have amended soils to facilitate drainage and asub- surfacedrainage system that will convey the filtered runoff into the existing City storm sewer system surrounding the site. The basins, as shown on the plans, will be located in the boulevard between the parking lot on the south, east, and west sides. The stormwater runoff from a portion of the roof and the emergency driveway on the west side of the building currently flows into a constructed water quality pond on the property to the west. This drainage and treatment will be maintained following redevelopment. Stormwater runoff from the yard area north of the building currently leaves the site with no water quality treatment. The developer has proposed the construction of underground sedimentation basins in several locations to provide the required nutrient and sediment treatment. Based upon the above discussion, it appears that the BCWMC Level 1 water quality treatment standards will be met for this redevelopment. G:\Developments -Private\Menards\Preliminary PUD Amendment Review # 2.doc The stormwater system being constructed by the developer will be owned and maintained by the developer. Therefore, the developer will be required to enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement for this system, including the water quality improvements. This agreement must be signed prior to City Council consideration of the final PUD. This redevelopment is also subject to the City's stormwater Management Ordinance. Following approval from the BCWMC, the contractor must apply for a Golden Valley stormwater Management Permit. This permit must be approved before any land disturbing activities can be completed on the site. The demolition plan submitted with PUD application indicates that all paved surfaces will be removed.: However, the plan is not clear as to the timing of the pavement removal. Staff recommends that the majority of the pavement on-site be left in place during building construction to minimize the potential for tracking mud and materials onto the adjacent street system. Construction of the new parking lots must be scheduled to minimize the tracking of materials off-site and must be illustrated on the stormwater management plan and the construction plans for the improvements. Following construction, the developer will need to submit construction record plans for the City to retain for its records. Tree Preservation This redevelopment project is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. The developer must submit a tree preservation plan and removal/mitigation calculations as part of the final PUD approval. Summary and Recommendation Public Works staff recommends approval of this proposed Planned Unit Development subject to the comments contained in this memorandum, which are summarized as follows. 1. The developer must relocate the gate and security building at the material storage yard entrance as far west as practical in order to address the potential access issues discussed in this review. 2. The sanitary sewer service to the property must be in compliance with the City's Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. 3. The developer must construct all improvements within the right-of-way for Wayzata Boulevard, Hampshire Avenue, and Market Street in compliance with City standards and specifications and according to the Right-of-Way Management Ordinance. G:\Developments -Private\Menards\Preliminary PUD Amendment Review # 2.doc 4 4. The developer must submit a revised Utility Plan that incorporates the water service and fire protection discussed within this review. This revised plan must be included in the final PUD submittal. 5. The developer will own and maintain the watermains, water service lines, fire hydrants, and gate valves within the property boundaries, and must therefore enter into a maintenance agreement for these facilities. 6. The developer will own and maintain all storm sewer catch basins, manholes, lines, and water quality features within the site boundaries and must therefore enter into a maintenance agreement for these facilities. 7. Subject to the review and comment by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. 8. The developer must comply with the Tree Preservation Ordinance and must submit a tree preservation plan with the final PUD submittal. 9. Subject to the review and comment of the Fire Chief, City Attorney, and other City staff. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Tom Burt, City Manager Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire and Inspections AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator Mitch Hoeft, Engineer Mark Ray, Engineering Technician Gary Johnson, Building Official Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshall G:\Developments -Private\MenardslPreliminary PUD Amendment Review # 2.doc Cii r of ~n n ~ tr1 i+ .yF:~ ~ r ~ o en a e W ~ 3 Fire Department Fire Department 763-593-8065 / 763-593-80981fax1 To: Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Zoning From: Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal cc: Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire and Inspections Jeff Oliver, City Engineer Subject: PUD 75 Amendment #3 -Menards Date: September 21, 2010 The Golden Valley Fire Department staff has reviewed the application for the amendment PUD 75, Menards home improvement site located at 6800 Wayzata Blvd. This review will focus on the fire department requirements on demolition, fire department apparatus access, utilities, landscaping and reasonable level of life safety for hazards of fire or dangerous conditions and to provide safety to firefighters and emergency responders during emergency operations to the site. Demolition 1. The demolition of all the buildings located on the site shall be in accordance with the Minnesota State Fire Code and the City of Golden Valley requirements. 2. The existing underground fire suppression water service lines shall be removed, not to be salvaged or reused for this new development. 3. Removal of all existing fire suppression equipment located inside the building, the main building and outside storage building shall be in accordance with the recognized fire code standards. Utili Plan 1. The current document does not indicate water mains for the on site fire hydrants, fire suppression water mains or post indicator valves for this proposed site. Provide and submit to the Golden Valley Fire Department a utility plan to identify the location of on site fire hydrants and water mains. 2. The installation of the on site fire hydrants located on this proposed site shall be in accordance with the Minnesota State Fire Code and also in conjunction with the City of Golden Valley engineering department. The installation of fire hydrants shall not be installed near the building collapse zone area. 3. The underground water service for the fire suppression system and fire hydrants for the site shall be installed with due regard of the installation under the buildings and dead end water mains and fire hydrants. 4. The location of fire hydrants on the site shall not be obstructed in any manner or materials including, but not limited to, landscaping, electrical equipment, gas meters and other means that would hinder the fire department operation. Vehicle impact protection will be required to protect the fire hydrants and the post indicator valves. 5. The water supply capable of supplying the required fire flow water for the fire protection shall be provided to the premise upon which the facilities buildings or portion of the buildings are hereafter constructed or moved into or within the City of Golden Valley. 6. The fire flow requirements for the building or portions of the building and facility shall be determined by an approved method by the fire code official. The fire flow requirements will be determined by the proposed facility building or portion of the building location, type of construction, type of use of the building and all floor levels. Civil Site -Provide and submit to the Golden Valley Fire Department a civil plan of the proposed site to indicate the following requirements. 1. The fire department access road for this proposed site shall be in accordance with the Minnesota State Fire Code. The fire department access road shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet in the immediate vicinity of any building or portion of the building more than 30 feet in height. The fire department access road shall be posted "No parking fire lanes" in accordance with the City of Golden Valley city ordinance. 2. The fire department access road shall be provided for every facilities building or portion of the building. The access road shall extend to within 150 feet of all portion of the facilities or any portion of an exterior wall measured to an approved route around the building. If the fire department access road cannot be installed due to location of the property or other conditions, an approved alternate means of fire protection or safeguards will be required. Fire protection or safeguards include, but not limited to, fire suppression systems, Class I standpipe systems, fire alarm systems. and any other fire suppression or safeguard approved by the fire code official. 3. The fire department access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. The fire department access to the lumber yard located on the east side of the building site will need to be reviewed by the fire code official for access into the lumber yard after hours. Emergency access gate may be required. 4. The fire department access road shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet -six inches. 5. The inside turning radius shall be a minimum of 20 feet, outside radius shall be a minimum of 40 feet, and shall meet. approval of the fire department and the turning radius shall be identified on the submittal site plan for the fire department review and approval. 6. Dead end fire apparatus access roads exceeding 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turnaround for the fire apparatus. Please submit a site plan to the fire code official with the proposed selection(s) of fire apparatus turn around for approval. Landscaping Plan 1. The landscaping materials that are designed for this site shall not be placed or kept near fire hydrants. Fire department connections, post indicator valves or other fire protection and control valves in a manner that would prevent such equipment or fire hydrants from being immediately deterred or hindered from gaining immediate access. 2. The landscaping materials located on the proposed site shall not be obstructed in any manner or materials including, but not limited to, electrical equipment, gas meters, required building egress and/or other means that would hinder the fire department ground and aerial ladder operations. Please submit the information to the Golden Valley Fire Department for review. Miscellaneous Items 1. The fire department will require fire department rapid entry lock boxes for the proposed site. The rapid entry lock boxes will be installed on all fire. department access exterior doors and exterior gates, identified to this plan. The rapid entry lock boxes can be purchased from the Knox Box Company at www.knoxbox.com 2. The location of fire extinguishers throughout the proposed site will be in accordance with the Minnesota State Fire Code. 3. The proposed above ground fuel tank proposed for this site shall be designed, installed and maintained in accordance with Minnesota State Fire Code, City of Golden Valley requirements for private fuel dispensing. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065 or eandersonCa~ci.golden- valley.mn.us. ea/jl ~~ September 9, 2010 City of Golden Valley Planning and Development Office Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Re: Preliminary PUD Narrative -Menards of Golden Valley Redevelopment Plan -REVISED Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council: This letter is being provided in .support of the accompanying Application for Consideration of Planned Unit Development Ordinance -Preliminary Design Plan. Menards has owned the proposed site for approximately three decades. The subject property is currently zoned as the Menard Addition, PUD No. 75. In accordance with Section 11.55 Sub 5(A)(3) of the City Code, a narrative statement must be provided with the preliminary PUD application explaining how the proposed PUD will meet the purpose and other provisions of the PUD Ordinance including how it will: a. Encourage, preserve and improve the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City by encouraging the use of contemporary land planning principles. The proposed redevelopment of the existing store site will improve the health, safety and general welfare of the people of City by providing an enhanced shopping experience at a new store with expanded merchandising. The proposed redevelopment will also preserve the City's tax base by avoiding the need to relocate to a larger site, potentially outside of the Golden Valley City limits. b. Achieve a high quality of site planning, design, .landscaping, and building materials which are compatible with the existing and planned land uses. The existing store site presented many redevelopment challenges to our design team. The current acreage of the subject property would not fit our latest prototypical single-story Menards store footprint. Their solution was to grow vertically and position our 2-story prototype on site. The proposed site plan, landscaping and building elevations take similar design cues from neighboring properties to ensure compatibility while preserving architectural features identifiable to a prototypical Menards store. c. Encourage preservation and protection of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, water ways, wetlands .and lake. The proposed site plan attempts to preserve as many of the existing trees on site as possible given the limited acreage for redevelopment. However, the proposed storm water management plan includes the installation of bio-retention facilities surrounding the perimeter of the parking lot. As a result, several trees must be removed to accommodate these facilities. We are proposing to replace some of these trees in locations on site that will not interfere with the function of these environmentally friendly facilities. 5101 MENARD DRIVE EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703-9625 PHONE (715) 876-5911 FAX (715) 876-2868 d. Encourage construction of affordable housing and a variety of housing types. Menards is the low price leader in building materials and home improvement supplies. The expanded merchandising that the proposed new store can provide will guaranty more competitive options to the citizens of Golden Valley, which will foster affordable housing and home improvement. e. Encourage creativity and flexibility in land development. The proposed site plan is a creative solution to redevelop an existing store site for a specific use -anew Menards. However, in the event Menards were to vacate, the proposed site plan offers some flexibility to other users. For example, the proposed 2-story building could be utilized by another retailer and the proposed lumber yard could be striped for additional parking that is often necessary with. higher traffic volume retailers. f. Encourage efficient and effective use of land, open space, streets, utilities. and other public facilities. Due to the limited acreage of the subject property, creative design considerations had to be incorporated into the proposed site plan. Construction of a 2-story Menards and subsurface storm water quality facilities were designed to limit any impact to existing landscaping, public streets and facilities. g. Allowing mixing land uses and assembly and development of land to form larger parcels Although a mixed use is not proposed for the subject property, at approximately 13 acres, there is plenty of lot space to accommodate a more traditional mixed use development of the site in the future. h. Encourage development in transitional areas which achieve compatibility with all adjacent and nearby land uses. Menards has a lot of history on the subject property and does not want to relocate despite the challenges it faces with the proposed redevelopment of its current location. Menards has the philosophy of reinvesting in its existing property whenever feasible. This philosophy is often contagious and the proposed redevelopment may encourage the revitalization of the whole area. i. Achieve development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Although the new Menards project does not propose a mixed use, as contemplated within the I-394 Overlay District, the proposed development does contemplate a multistory building and the creative redevelopment of an outdated Menards store. As such, the proposed project brings to light the spirit of the intent of the I-394 Overlay. j. Achieve development consistent with the City's redevelopment plans and goals. Certainly the creative redevelopment of an outdated Menards store is consistent with the City's redevelopment plans and goals, particularly given the history of its corporate citizenship. k. Encourage development that is sustainable and has a high degree of energy efficiency. Menards is proposing to use precast, insulated panels to form the exterior facade of the two-story building. This building system achieves an extremely efficient R-value. The building will also utilize several large skylights to capture natural liglit. Additionally, Menards recycles many different materials both at the store level and at its headquarters in Eau Claire, Wisconsin. Thank you for your time and consideration of this Preliminary PUD Narrative. If there is any additional information that I can provide to aid in your review of this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Menard, Inc. ~~""~, Aaron M. Morrissey Real Estate Representative Phone: (715) 876-2177 Fax: (715) 876-5998 amorriss@menard-inc.com EXHIBIT "B" Variances and Explanations 1. Si Wage (Section 4.20) -Subdivision 9(J)(3)(b) permits a maximum total signage of 400 square feet within Subdistrict "C" on the subject property. Menard, Inc. is proposing to reduce its prototypical wall signage to 381.6 square feet. The existing Menards store has 706.4 square feet of wall signage. However, Menards would. like to continue to use the existing Menards pylon sign with message board and reserve the option to replace the face /panel of the pylon sign. Therefore, Menard, Inc. is requesting a variance to permit the height and total square footage of the existing pylon sign with message board (with existing setback) in addition to the proposed 381.6 square feet of proposed wall signage on the new 2-story Menards. 2. Fences (Section 11.72) -Subdivision 3(B)(1) does not permit fences exceeding eight. (8) feet in height. Menard, Inc. requests relief from the fence height requirements of the Ordinance. The proposed fencing conforms to the 14' height in existence at the current store. The 14' height, combined with the opaque, screening nature of the treated lumber fence, provides external visual protection from Menard, Inc.'s outdoor sales and storage area. As the 14' height is necessary to provide adequate screening, it adds to the aesthetics of Menard, Inc.'s concept and justifies the grant of variance. 3. I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District (Section 11.47) - If approved, the proposed PUD would vary from several code sections found within Section 11.47. Although the proposed Menards store redevelopment does not conflict with the purpose outlined within Subdivision 1 of this Section, the size and character of the subject property presents many challenges. The specific physical conditions of the site and the proposed buildings would make compliance infeasible or inappropriate. Additionally, this Section of the code certainly does not contemplate the redevelopment of a Menards store within the I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District. In fact, on August 6, 2007 the Golden Valley City Council unanimously approved an ordinance rezoning the subject property to the new I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District and Menard, Inc. was present to voice its concerns with the impact the ordinance would have on a potential Menards store remodel or redevelopment project. At the meeting the City stated that Menards would be insulated (or even exempted) from the new zone by virtue of our store's existing PUD and that the City wants to keep Menards at its current location in Golden Valley. With the above reasoning in mind, Menard, Inc. would require variances from the following specific code section of the I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District: A. Subdivision 4(B) B. Subdivision 6(B) the Southwest cor C. Subdivision 6(F) site. D. Subdivision 6(G) E. Subdivision 7(A) -Need PUD to grant conditional use. - Reduction of parking setback to zero feet as required on ner of the site. - Permit one-story warehouse and yard gate buildings on -Increase impervious allowance to 91 %. - Permit a single use on a site exceeding one acre. F. Subdivision 7(B) -Reduce open space to 9% G. Subdivision 8(A) -Permit the building and parking layout as depicted on the site plan. H. Subdivision 8(B) -Permit the building facades as depicted on the elevation plans. I. Subdivision 8(C) -Reduce window and door openings as depicted on the elevation plans. J. Subdivision 8(E) -Permit the building materials identified on the elevation plans. K. Subdivision 8(F) -Permit the bright or primary colors identified on the elevation plans. L. Subdivision 8(G) -Permit off-street parking to be located as set forth on the site plan. M. Subdivision 8(H) -Reduce parking screening to zero feet as required on the Southwest corner of the site and allow the proposed landscaping to satisfy the required level of parking screening and minimum tree requirements elsewhere on the site. N. Subdivision 8(I) -Permit sidewalks and related landscaping as set forth on the site plan. 4. Parkin (Section 11.70) A. Per Subdivision 3, Menard, Inc.'s minimum number of required off-street parking spaces are calculated as follows: Inside (Store and Warehouse) • Retail Store or Service Establishment: 158,263 sq. ft at 1:250 = 633 • Showrooms Other: 49,453 sq. ft. at 1:400 =124 • Warehouse and Storage: 64,075 sq. ft. at 1:3,000 = 21 Outside (Yard and Garden Center) • Outdoor Display: 17,975 sq. ft. at 1:2,000 = 9 • Outdoor Storage: 8,171 sq. ft. at 1:20,000 = 0 TOTAL CODE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES = 787 Obviously, neither Golden Valley nor Menards is aided by Menards constructing a 787 parking space lot. Menard, Inc. often times discovers that city zoning ordinances are not tailored to Menards use when it comes to parking, and variances are necessary almost without exception. The site plan depicts 376 parking spaces in its current form; thus, Menard, Inc. requests a variance to 370 parking spaces to account for any further site plan changes which may slightly decrease the amount of parking. There are currently a total of 353 parking spaces at the existing store, of which, at least 16 parking spaces are currently being occupied by a garden center located in the parking lot (approved via Amendment No. 2 to Menards Addition PUD No. 75). As a result, the existing parking lot has 337 parking spaces and Menard, Inc. is proposing an increase of 33 parking spaces. The nature of Menards' use justifies 370 parking spaces rather than a higher number which would go unused. Menard, Inc. does not desire to pave several acres of land for parking that will never be utilized, just as the City of Golden Valley does not want several acres of unsightly, unused hard surface area paved for parking. Whereas other retailers meet the Ordinance and construct vast parking lots to meet the Christmas rush, Christmas is not Menard, Ind.'s peak sales period. Menard, Inc.'s "busy season" is actually two seasons, spring and summer, during which time we have a steady stream of customers, and not a single spike as other retailers enjoy at Christmas. As a retailer, Menard, Inc. is not about to under-park our use. Menards does not generate the same type of high traffic volumes that would be expected from a general retailer (Wal-Mart or Target). Its total floor area also includes large display and warehousing areas as well as larger aisles for maneuvering bulky items. These features contribute to the large building square footage and make building size a poor indicator of parking needs for this unique facility. In addition, Menard, Inc. finds that typically 15 - 25% of our customers are in the rear yard area at any given time, and do not require the use of storefront parking. Finally, in the event the use of the store ever changed to a more intensive use requiring greater parking, the 3.72E acre yard area could be converted to parking. B. Per Subdivision 2(I), Menard, Inc. is required to have at least four percent of the interior of the parking lot landscaped with vegetation. Menard, Inc. would require a variance to reduce this requirement to zero. Menard, Inc. requests a variance to deem the proposed landscaping bio-retention around the parking lot, as depicted on the site plan, satisfactory. Amendment No. 2 Menards Addition P.U.D. No. 75 City Council Approval: July 15, 1997 Amendment No. 1 Approval: June 23, 1998 Amendment No. 2 Approval: April 7, 2009 City of Golden Vaitey, Minnesota Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Project Name: Location: Legal Description: Applicant: Address: Owner: Address: Zoning District: Permitted Uses: Components: Menards Addition, P.U.D. No. 75 6800 Wayzata Blvd, Golden Valley, Minnesota Menards Addition P.U.D. No. 75, Lot 1, Block 1 Menard, Inc. 4777 Menard Drive, Eau Claire, WI 54703 Menard, Inc. 4777 Menard, Inc., Eau Claire, WI 54703 Mixed Use Lumber yard and building supply store A. Land Use Comaonent: 1. The site/utility plan prepared by Menard, Inc. and dated 5/27/98 shall become a part of the PUD approval. The building elevation plans dated 5/28/98, prepared by Menard, Inc. shall also become a part of the approval. These plans shall be kept in the official City files on P.U.D. No. 75 (Amendment No. 1), and these site and building plans shall be noted by City staff as the plans submitted as part of the General Plan approval. 2. The existing building and the additions to the building shall only be used by Menard, Inc. for use as a lumber yard and building supply store. 3. The landscaping/striping plan shall be completed as shown on the attached landscape plan prepared by Menard, Inc. and dated 5/27/98. This plan shall be submitted to the Building Board of Review for review and approval. Improvements and enhancements to this landscape plan may be made by the Building Board of Review. The final landscape plan approved by the Building Board of Review shall become a part of the General Plan approval. The screening structure shown on the landscape plan along portions of the north property line shall be constructed at the same time as the additions to Menards Addition P.U.D. No. 75 Page 2 the building. The Building Board of Review may require that upgrades be made to the existing fencing along Hampshire and frontage road. 4. The building addition shall be constructed as per the site plan and building elevations that are attached. 5. Any new, outside lighting for the parking or storage areas shaft be approved by the Chief of Fire and Inspections. The Chief shall have the right to modify any lighting. 6. All signage on the site must meet the requirements of the City's sign code. ../Menards may sell Christmas trees in the parking lot as long as no more than 20 spaces re used for the sales lot. 8. mendment No. 2 allows Menards to use a 36 ft. x 72 ft. area for live plant sales including a plant but as shown on the site plan submitted March 27, 2009. The plant sale is allowed to be held from April 1 to September 1 each year. 9. The westerly driveway going onto Market Street from the Menards site, as shown on the site plan, is to be gated and used only for City emergency vehicles. B. Circulation Com,~onent: 1. Access drives, parking and walkways shall be constructed as per the site plan. 2. If the Chief of Fire and Inspections determines that parking is not adequate for customers in the front (south) parking lot, Menards will be required to review its parking arrangement by changing employee parking areas or moving some employee parking off-site. C. Services and Facilities 1. The drainage plan prepared by Menard dated 10/18/96 shall become a part of this P.U.D. Permit. Any new or future connections to the City's storm sewer system shall be done only with the approval of the City Engineer. 2. Any new sewer and water service connections shall conform to the City's utility standards. 3. No outside speaker system shall be used to notify customers or employees. It is hereby understood and agreed that this Use Permit is a part of the City Council approvals granted on July 15, 1997, June 23, 1998 and April 7, 2009. Any changes to the P.U.D. Permit for Menards Addition, P.U.D. No. 75 shall require an additional amendment. Menards Addition P.U.D. No. 75 Page 3 MENARD, INC. Witness: By: ~ ~~~ ~l~ef~c Title: L~ O. d . Date: ~~~~ ~' -•--T--• CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY ,~~y~ Witness: By: _ Linda R. Loomis, Mayor Witness: Date: ~' r' U' U By: Tho aseD. Burt, y anager Date: ~l r w' U Warning: This permit does not exempt you from all other City Code provisions, regulations and ordinances.