11-09-10 HRA Special Workshop Meeting AgendaAGENDA
GOLDEN VALLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Special Workshop Meeting
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Tuesday -November 9, 2010
6:30 PM or immediately following the Council/Manager Meeting
Golden Valley City Council Conference Room
Review of Three• Nine•Four Development Proposals
2. Adjournment
' 't~ '°` This document'is available in alternate formats-upon a 72-hour request. Tease calf
t ~ ~' %b3-593-806 (TTV: 763-593=39b8) to make a request. Examples of alternate formats
.~~ 3 ~ may include large print, electronic, Braille, audiocassette, etc.
~~ _~T,~
'Golden galley
Memorandum
Housing & Redevelopment
Authority
763-593-8014 / 763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary for Action
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Special Workshop Meeting
November 9, 2010
1. Agenda Item
The Three•Nine•Four Development Proposals
Prepared By
Jeanne Andre, Assistant Director
Mark Grimes. Director of Planning and Development
Joe Hogeboom, City Planner
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, City Engineer
Mark Ray, E.I. T
Summary
Global One Commercial has been working with the HRA and its staff on developing the
MnDOT parcel in the northwest quadrant of Highway 100 and I-394. The greatest concern
with proposals that have been presented in the past, is access to the site, both in terms of the
amount of peak-hour traffic flowing through the Golden Hills Drive/ Xenia Avenue intersection
and the lack of street access to the MnDOT parcel. MnDOT has indicated that it would
provide access through the expanded alleyway north of the Metropolitan/Good Day Cafe, .but
this access does not meet public street access called for in the City Code.
Global One Commercial has submitted two new development proposals that incorporate an
adjacent parcel and provide street access to Circle Down. Global One would like to start the
planning approval process with one of these proposals and is seeking staff input on how to
proceed. Staff has reviewed the proposals and identified concerns with each of the
proposals. This review is based solely upon the information provided by the developer at this
time, and does not constitute a complete review of the development. Staff reserves the right
to require additional plans and analysis as the development process proceeds. In addition,
staff reserves the right to modify the comments contained in this review based upon
additional information required.
Staff would like to present the proposals to the HRA at a workshop session to get comments
from the Commissioners.
Option 26 Overview
This option incorporates the original six-story, 165-room hotel and bank facility, asix-story,
160-unit apartment building and adds athree-story, 90-unit apartment building on the north
side of the expanded development site.
Option 27 Overview
This option includes the same hotel and bank facility, but combines all of the apartment units
into one six-story, 261-unit apartment building.
Staff comments are segregated into those that apply to both proposals and those related to
specific options.
General Comments
1. The City's consulting transportation engineer, SEH, Inc., reviewed both Options #26 and
#27 to evaluate whether these options would generate traffic that would create
operational issues at the intersection of Xenia Avenue and Golden Hills Drive. SEH, Inc.
determined that the traffic generated by these two options does not exceed previously
established thresholds for trip generation during either the AM or PM peak hours. SEH's
memo is attached to this document for additional information.
1. The proposed access roadway to the new development appears to be a 36-foot wide
roadway. In general, the concept of separating the traffic from the Good Day
Cafe/Metropolitan site and the proposed Three Nine Four Site is favorable, pending the
resolution of several issues. Due to the nature of the development, this access roadway
will be privately owned and maintained by the development.
2. The developer must include truck-turning movements on the site plan for the new
development. The design vehicles should include a WB (wheelbase) 53 semi, and a 45-
foot long single unit vehicle as an emergency response design vehicle.
3. The developer claims that the proposed uses require no loading docks or
accommodations for large delivery vehicles. Staff is concerned about that semis and
large delivery vehicles will be used at the site. The plan must include potential locations
of delivery and service points within the development. In specific, trash pickup, moving
trucks, and delivery access, along with wheel paths to demonstrate maneuverability of
these vehicles on site must be shown on the plans.
4. Staff questions whether an emergency exit to Circle Down at the east end of the parcel is
reasonable given the elevation changes between the parcel and Circle Down.
5. The developer will be required to meet all applicable stormwater management
requirements of the City and the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission
(BCWMC) for the new development.
6. Both options have a street connection to Circle Down at the west end of the site but also
keep the MnDOT expanded alley access that goes west to Turners Crossroad as a
reliever access. The plan must include the location of all service points to the existing
land uses and the maneuverability of service vehicles on site. This must include the
wheel paths of the same design vehicles discussed above.
7. Both options remove the Mayfair apartments, which include 24 units of affordable rental
housing. The new units are proposed to be market rate.
8. Either of the options would be presented as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) which
allows deviation from Code requirements based on evaluation of the individual
development.
Option 26 Comments
1. A three-story building is allowed on the current Mayfair Apartment site under the
current mixed-use zoning district.
2. A detailed zoning and engineering analysis is required to fully assess requirements
such as setbacks, maximum impervious surface and ponding requirements. The
developer has indicated that all of the ponding for this proposal is in underground
facilities.
3. The parking provided for each use along with the standard requirement under City
Code is as follows: new apartment 154/160, hotel-bank 165/258 and larger apartment
building 234/320. It appears that the parking provided is significantly less than required
by Code.
Option 27 Comments
1. Under the current Mixed-Use Zoning District asix-story building is not allowed on the
current Mayfair Apartments site. In the I-394 Mixed-Use Zoning District, sites that
adjoin single-family residential neighborhoods typically are allowed to have buildings
up to three stories in height, which is the situation in this case. Because there are
multiple buildings, this project would most likely go forward as a PUD, which
establishes its own zoning. However staff generally recommends that the underlying
zoning match that of the PUD.
2. A detailed zoning and engineering analysis is required to fully assess requirements
such as setbacks, maximum impervious surface and ponding requirements. The
developer has suggested that the pond will meet surface water quality requirements.
3. The parking provided for each use along with the standard requirement under the City
Code is as follows: hotel-bank 185/258, apartment building 354/522. It appears that
the parking provided is significantly less than required by Code.
Going Forward
The Global One Commercial designation ended November 1. If the HRA would like to work
with the developer on one of the current development options or a hybrid thereof, this
designation should be extended. If the HRA does not want to proceed with a development.
proposal the designation should be formally terminated. In that case staff recommends
working with MnDOT to secure a permit to allow this parcel to be used for construction
staging for the City's Pavement Management Program and the Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services Division's proposed sanitary sewer project. Further analysis of
appropriate land uses should be undertaken that could possibly lead to rezoning.
Attachments
The Three•Nine•Fourdeuelopment options #26 and # 27 (dated 10-26-2010) 2 pages
Memorandum to Jeannine Clancy from Mike Kotila (dated November 4, 2010) 2 pages
Recommended Action
Provide staff direction on the desired use of the MnDOT parcel.
TURNERS
CROSSROAD
scum -
G ''~
~r~- -
w~:``
""'" ~
`-C~~~~
II
_ _ - _ -
I I
I I
L-._..1-
n rare xr- - °~,7w at` - - ~t V~~°3 -'~P'
80 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
90 UNDERGROUND PARYJNG
64 SURFACE PARKING SPACES
MONUMEM SIGN fOK BLANK
BRhVCX AND DEVEI OPMENi
~A ! ~~
!
_~
- ~~na ~ ! A
° ! ~
e '~( to zsLr ~ _ ~ ~ o
\ ° P
~ ~ asp !
o ~ ` ~ ~rW /
_ ~~ ~ /
- _ ____ __ __ _- -- ~ c /
a -lo io' - - -_ _~ - - - /
- 0 0 is \ ~ io /
I \ /
~ \v/
/ ~~ o v v
\ 16 ~ fiViRGENCY EMRNJCf
Q~~
\ \
5i0R.UWAiE ~
HILTON GARDEN INN
6 STOP,Y- 165 RODM HOTEL
113 UNDERGROUND PARK1NG55PACE5
52 SURFACE PARKING SPACES -
--- --- 0 0 0 -- °
0 0 o a ° ° _ -----
INTERSTATE 394
SITE PLAN -OPTION #26
SrniF i = Fn_rv
GL+~BAL ONE
COMMERCIAL
THE THREE • NINE • FOUR
GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
mouurnENr s~v
NfuvEMKY DwvE CIRCLE DOWN
,-
`_a -k~ ~ -----T-----~---- -
~ I I
i
r--
~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~
\~ I ~ ~
i
~ \~
i ~ m ~ 1
NI'1 /
- _ I ~ I-9 ., rtkrPx~A'Y sC~ _ _ _ .w,. -. w~. -. n~o..Uw,l _. IXISTING 51NGlE FAMIlY f10ME5 I !
160 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING ~° ~
160 UNDERGROUND PARKING SPACES (2 LEVELS)
745URFACE PARNNGSPACES o
/ ,
0 0 -
11WY ~ 00
SITE AREA: PHASE ONE:
+!- 7.06 ACRES 160 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING(6 STORY)
160 UNDERGROUND PARYJNG SPACES (2 LEVELS)
74 SURFACE PARKING SPACES
80 UNIT APARTMENT BUIIDING(3 STORY)
90 UNDERGROUND PARYJNG SPACES
64 SURFACE PARKING SPACES
PHASE TWO:
HILTON GARDEN INN(6 STORY), 165 ROOMS
113 PARKINGS SPACES BELOW GRADE
52 SURFACE PARKIN65PACE5
I STORY BANK BRANCH
OPTION #26 TU9HIE
MONTGOMERY
ARCHITECTS
10/26/2010
TURNERS
CROSSROAD
SoDm
M9NUMWi SIGN
NEWENiRY pWVE CRCIf DOuVN
_ ~
- . - ~_
o ~ I~ ----~-----~-----~ ~-
I I I
ARNNG ,( ~J ~ /
5°AGE ~ I I ( I
~ i
I ~( I I I
I' ~ ~ I ( ~ I ~ ~ l
I ( I ~~~`.
rw~s; t ( IX15TNG SINGLE FAMILY HOME /
' - s~wuuNG P
-- I
{ I
.I~ + + + is'aaeKinG SETB,m;A /~ YP
I _ _ _ _ _ \ \
7 Y~ ~- ~ _ _ _ _wsm~iNC~mAIr _ _ - - ) ~ ~ ~
SV~'NFM1R YARD Butpl
vl _ _ _ _ _ 30N0 FEATURE. _ _ ' ser~cR ~ _ P ~
s~ ~wwsiroNnE nei~r
. a+crcNn,V zs ne /
ENTRY TO i~Jl ~~
~, UPPER LEVEL iz iz ~ P ~
8,- ENTRY TO ~s. N
J-_~ i~ PARKING
--=-~-~ ~~ _ A LOWfR LEVEL ~ ~ i G ~ ~Y, Y
Y ----- _ _ _ PARKING ~ s08,Y, Y
0 `
_ I
~yy
~'Y
n~
a I,
(Ic
_ _ - - -
I ~
I I i h
BANK BRANCH
85 PARKING SPACES
HILTON GARDEN INN
6 STORY - 165 ROOM HOTEL
100 UNDERGROUND PARKING SPACES
85 SURFACE PARYJNG SPACES
MONUMENT SIGN WRBUVK
BRnucn aNO oere~eM
INTERSTATE 394
SITE PLAN -OPTION #27
SCALE I ° = 5d-d'
THE THREE • NINE • FOUR
GLOBAL ONE
COMMERCIAL
GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
3 _ -
71 90 PARKING SPACFS(ljZ~ , ~ I$ "A1`~? \ ~
ENTRY TO UPPER
LEVEL PARKING
261 UNIT65TORY APARTMENT BUILDING
262 UNDERGROUND PARKNG SPACES (2 LEVELS)
905URFACE PARYJNG SPACES ~ ~1
r
- - -----
517E AREA: PHASE ONE:
+I-7.06 ACRf5 261 UNRAPARTMENT BUILDING(65TORY)
262 UNDERGROUND PARKING SPACES (2 LEVELS)
90 SURFACE PARKING SPACES
PHASE 1W0:
HILTON GARDEN INN(6 STORYI, 165 ROOMS
100 PARYJNG SPACES BELOW GRADE
85 SURFACE PARKING SPACES
I STORY BANK BRANCH
~ ~.. ~
OPTION #27
10/26/2010
EMERGE^F,l'ACCE558PART
1WY ~ ~O
T U S H I E
MOIJTGOMERY
ARCHITECTS
a
E
~.
E
8
~~
SEH MEMORANDUM
TO: Jeannine Clancy
FROM: ~ Mike Kotila, PE
Jerilyn Swenson, EI
DATE: November 4, 2010
RE: Global One Trip Generation Option 26 and Option 27
SEH No. GOLDV-108711
This technical memorandum provides trip generation findings related to two potential Global One
development scenarios -Option 26 and Option 27. Findings reported in this memorandum are provided
within the context of the analysis previously performed for Global One development scenarios (see
September 1, 2009 memorandum).
The land uses considered for the current development scenarios are:
O tion 26
• 160 unit apartment
• 80 unit apartment
• 165 (room hotel
• 1 ba~-k (assumed to be 5,000 square feet)
Option 27
• 261 unit apartment
• 165 room hotel
• 1 bank (assumed to be 5,000 square feet)
Based on previous analysis (as reported in the September 1, 2009 memorandum), 189 is the maximum
number of outbound Global One development trips that could be accommodated at the Xenia
Avenue/Golden Hills Drive intersection during the PM peak hour while simultaneously serving existing
and future demands from other planned developments in the area. The threshold assumes that intersection
capacity improvements would be in place prior to full build out of all properties considered.
The Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation Manual, 8`" Edition, was used to develop trip
estimates for the proposed scenarios (the 7"' Edition was also referred to for AM trip generation for the
bank land usei,). Results are shown in Table 1 on the following page.
For Option 2~, it is estimated that a total of 307 PM peak hour trips would be generated, of which 132
would be outbound trips. The outbound pm peak hour trip total is less than the 189 threshold, therefore it
is expected thlat intersection operations would be within acceptable parameters as previously defined.
For Option 2'~, it is estimated that a total of 321 PM peak hour trips would be generated, of which 137
would be outbound trips. The outbound pm peak hour trip total is less than the 189 threshold, therefore it
is expected thlat intersection operations would be within acceptable parameters as previously defined.
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302
SEH i5 an equal opportunity employer- ( www.sehinc.com ~ 952.912.2600 ~ 800.734.6757 ( 952.912.2601 fax
Global One Trip Generation Option 26 and Option 27
November 4,',2010
Page 2
Table 1
Option 26 and Option 27 Trip Generation Estimates
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
', Land Size Unit Volume Volume
~!, Use (CODE)
In Out Total In Out Total
Proposed Gloabal One Office Expansion Option 26
Apartments Building (220) 160 Units 16 65 81 64 35 99
Apartments Building (220) 80 Units 8 33 41 32 17 49
Hotel (310) 165 Rooms 56 36 92 52 46 98
Bank (911) 5,000 SF 10 10 20 27 34 61
Total Vehicle !Trips Generated by Proposed Global One Development Option 90 144 234 175 1.32 307
Proposed Global One Office Expansion Option 27
Apartments Building (220) 261 Units 27 106 133 105 57 162
Hotel (310) 165 Rooms 56 36 92 52 46 98
Bank (911) 5,000 SF 10 10 20 27 34 61
Total Vehicle'Trips Generated by Proposed Global One Development Option 93 152 245 184 137 321
Trip generation estimates during the AM peak period are also provided in Table 1. Trip totals are lower
than those estimated during the PM peak hour. In addition, existing demands on the street system and
future demands from other nearby sites also tend to be lower during the AM period. Therefore AM
conditions artg not anticipated to control the design of the Xenia Avenue/Golden Hills Drive intersection.
When a prefe~red development scenario is selected, it is recommended that a final traffic operations
analysis be p$rformed to confirm preliminary findings and to document the expected intersection
performance delay and LOS) during the AM and PMpeak hours.
p:\fj\g\goldv\108711\gldbal one medical office tis\report\memo - globalone_option26_27_I 10410.docx