Loading...
01-10-11 PC AgendaAGENDA Planning Commission Regular Meeting Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers Monday, January 10, 2011 7 pm 1. Approval of Minutes a. December 13, 2010 Regular Planning Commission Meeting 2. Informal Public Hearing -Minor Subdivision - 240 Jersey Ave N - SU17-09 a. Applicant: Lakewest Maki, LLC -Curt Fretham b. Address: 240 Jersey Ave N c. Purpose: The applicant is proposing to create two new lots for the construction of one new home (the existing home will remain). 3. Informal Public Hearing -Property Rezonings - 8805, 8905, 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Blvd from Industrial to Commercial and 5075 Wayzata Blvd and 1400, 1500 Highway 100 South from Commercial to Business and Professional Offices a. Applicant: City of Golden Valley b. Addresses: 8805, 8905, 9191, 9393 and 5075 Wayzata Blvd and 1400, 1500 Highway 100 South c. Purpose: To bring the properties into conformance with the recently updated Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map 4. Short Recess 5. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council,. Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings 6. Other Business a. Planning Commission Representative to the Golden Valley 125tH Anniversary Planning Team 7. Adjournment °~ This document is avai(ablein altarnateform~fis upona 72-3~aur request.Rleasecall s € 763-593-8006 (TTY: 763-593-3968} to make a request. Examples of alternate fiormats ~ Y; ;~~ may inci~ECle large ~rin~, electronic, Braille, audiocassette, etc. r>,' ~,... _ _w ~ ........., ~,..~ ....... ~ . __.._. _.~.~....,.. ~wY,...~... ~. ... .... ,...~. ......... ~,.___.w Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 13, 2010 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley,. Minnesota, on Monday, December 13, 2010. Chair Waldhauser called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Cera, Eck, Kluchka, McCarty, Schmidgall, Segelbaum and Waldhauser. Also present was Director of Planning and Development Mark Grimes and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Approval of Minutes October 25, 2010 Regular Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Eck, seconded by McCarty and motion carried unanimously to approve the October 25, 2010 minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing -Minor Subdivision - 5360 and 5380 Lowry Terrace - SU03-01 Applicant: David and Sandra Raley Address: 5360 and 5380 Lowry Terrace' Purpose: The applicants are requesting that the property line between the two properties be moved 9 feet to the east Grimes referred to a survey of the properties and explained that the applicant, who owns both properties, is proposing to move the lot line between the properties 9 feet to the east. He stated that both properties after subdividing will meet all of the City's requirements. Cera asked why the applicant is subdividing the properties. Grimes said he thought it was due to a pond that is located on the existing property line. Kluchka asked if the lots would be big enough to divide again in the future. Grimes said no because corner lots need 100 feet of frontage. Segelbaum noted that the new lot line will make the house on Lot 4 (5360 Lowry Terrace) be right at the 15-foot setback line. He expressed concern about the applicant creating a hardship for future homeowners wanting to construct an addition on the west side of the house. Grimes agreed that the existing home on Lot 4 could not add a second story because the side yard setback wouldn't be big enough, but other additions could be made to the house without requiring variances. Kluchka asked how future homeowners would be informed that an addition could not be constructed on the west side of the house on Lot 4. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 13, 2010 Page 2 Grimes said the history of the property would be located in City files and the City tries to educate people about setback requirements, but ultimately it is buyer beware. Cera asked what the size of the lots would be after they were subdivided. Grimes stated that one lot would be approximately 19,000 square feet and the other lot would be approximately 16,000 square feet. David Raley, 5380 Lowry Terrace, Applicant, stated that he has a pond on his property and he would like to move the lot line because he doesn't want to infringe on the adjacent property when mowing or doing maintenance. Waldhauser asked about the age of the homes. Raley stated that both homes were moved onto the lots approximately 9 years ago. Segelbaum asked the applicant if he has any plans to construct an addition on the west side of the house at 5360 Lowry Terrace. Raley said no. Waldhauser reiterated that the implications of making Lot 4 narrower would not impact the City, but it may impact future homeowners. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public hearing. Segelbaum stated that he realizes a subsequent homeowners proposal would stand on its own merit but he questioned if there is a way to Hate that if a future homeowner at 5360 Lowry Terrace were to ask the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance it would more than likely be denied because the hardship would have been created by the property owner. Waldhauser said she doesn't think it's the Planning Commission's place to protect future homeowners. Grimes noted that conditions have been placed on subdivisions in the past regarding new construction but it would be difficult to place conditions on a proposal like this. MOVED by Eck, seconded by McCarty and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the minor subdivision request for the properties located at 5360 and 530 Lowry Terrace subject to the following: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. The City Engineer's email, dated November 24, 2010, shall become part of this approval. 3. The Proposed Sketch, submitted by the applicants, dated March 18, 2002, shall become part of this approval. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 13, 2010 Page 3 3. Informal Public Hearing -Planned Unit Development Amendment -Final Design Plan - 6800 Wayzata Boulevard -Menards - PU-75, Amendment #3 Applicant: Menard, Inc. Address: 6800 Wayzata Blvd. Purpose: The applicant is proposing the replacement of the existing Menards store with a new 2-story Menards home improvement center... Grimes reminded the Planning Commission that they reviewed and recommended the approval of the Preliminary Plan for this proposal in October. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plan in November and now the applicant is back with the Final Plan proposal. He explained that the Planning Commission's role is to decide if the Final Plan is consistent with the Preliminary Plan approved by Council. Grimes referred to a site plan and noted that Menards has made several of the changes suggested by the Planning Commission and the City Council including: creating landscape islands, providing a bicycle parking area, increasing landscaping on the rear and sides of the building and adding approximately 26 parking spaces to the rear of the building to be used if needed. Grimes noted a discrepancy in the plans and the staff report regarding the finish used on the exterior. He said his understanding is that the front of the building will be buff colored, brick stamped concrete panels. The sides will be buff colored, raked concrete panels and the back will be gray colored, raked concrete panels. Because the back of the building will not be visible from the street, the standard gray panel is acceptable. Grimes referred to the City Council's suggestion that a sidewalk be added along Hampshire Ave. He explained that upon review, staff does not feel a sidewalk in that location would be in the City's best interest because of topography issues and the railroad crossing. It is also not identified on the City's sidewalk plan and would reduce the amount of water infiltration and take away from the storm water management efforts being proposed. Grimes referred to the City Council's condition that snow storage shall not be allowed on the site. He stated that Menards is asking that snow storage be allowed unless parking becomes an issue, then snow would be removed. Waldhauser questioned if snow storage is also an aesthetic or a visibility issue. Grimes said it is a parking issue. Eck said he is skeptical of the adequacy of the amount of parking being proposed. He said he has been to Menards several times and the parking lot has been almost full. He also questioned how customers would know about the spaces available in back of the building. Kluchka stated that the parking spaces in the back of the building would only be used for employee parking if needed; it would not be used for customer parking. Segelbaum questioned if the parking lot is being used as efficiently as possible. He asked if there is a Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 13, 2010 Page 4 reduction in the number of parking spaces from what is currently there. Grimes stated that there are approximately 20 more parking spaces in this proposal. Eck asked why staff is recommending that snow storage be allowed if there are no issues with parking when the City Council said there shall be no snow storage allowed. Grimes explained that Menards asked that the condition be changed to allow snow storage unless there is a problem with parking and staff agreed that their request could go before the Planning Commission for review however, he agrees with the Council that there should be no snow storage allowed. Aaron Morrissey, Real Estate Representative, Menard, Inc., Applicant, showed pictures of the color and the texture of the concrete they are proposing to use. He explained how the back of the building would not be visible when looking from the south to the north. He referred to the site plan and noted the area that could be used for employee parking if necessary. Kluchka said he has a significant concern about the view. when driving to Menards from the west. He said it will look like a gray box and he doesn't see that there was any design attention paid to making the southwest corner of the store more pleasing. He suggested a plaza approach or something that matches the garden center area or another way to make "the box" more transparent so it doesn't look like a box or a warehouse. Morrissey stated that the Council had similar concerns and pointed out that only a small corner of that facade will be visible and there will be trees and fencing in that location as well. He said he is not sure Menards would be willing to change their prototype. Kluchka said the design doesn't address the human scale and because this property is a major focal point he doesn't think it is responsible to have the design;look so stark. Morrissey explained that they can't mimic the garden center area on the west side of the building because they are using that area for pallet racking storage. He referred to the site plan and pointed out the pallet storage areas. Kluchka asked Morrissey to address the snow storage issue. Morrissey said he thought the snow storage issue could be handled the same as the parking issue. If there becomes a parking issue then they will remove the snow. McCarty said that if the Council has already said there should be no snow storage allowed than there should be no storage allowed. Grimes agreed. Kluchka added that mounds of snow won't increase the aesthetic appeal in the corridor. Morrissey said his understanding was that the City Council's concern regarding snow was parking, not aesthetics. Grimes reiterated that it is the Planning Commission's job to find if this Final Plan proposal is consistent with the Preliminary Plan already approved by the City Council. Kluchka suggested adding a condition of approval that Menards will have to have a parking plan in place regarding how they are going to handle their parking on busy days. Waldhauser referred to pedestrian navigation within the parking lot and suggested a sidewalk be installed back to Laurel along the west side. Morrissey said there is not enough room on west side of the site to add a sidewalk. Waldhauser questioned the size of the existing pylon sign and said she thought a two story building would provide enough visibility. Morrissey said there will be 381 square feet of signage on the building and the pylon sign is 150 square feet. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 13, 2010 Page 5 Waldhauser referred to the landscaping plan and suggested more trees be placed at the front of the store. McCarty said he appreciates Menards adding a second access on Hampshire. He addressed the issue of aesthetics and said getting rid of the flags, logo and wood columns would be a cost savings and get rid of the "woodsy" look and be more like the Eden Prairie store. He added that this is in the Mixed Use zoning district and is competing with the new West End development in St. Louis Park. Morrissey explained that this front facade is identifiably Menards and is Menards preferred elevation. He added that this store is similar to the Eden Prairie store. Schmidgall agreed that the flags, logos and columns are a part of Menards identity and signage. McCarty said he understands that, but he would strongly encourage that the prototype look be changed. Waldhauser showed a photo of different building that she feels is attractive and also encouraged Menards to update their look. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to speak, Waldhauser closed the public hearing. Kluchka suggested a condition be added as follows: an overflow parking plan shall be filed with the City that proactively redirects customers to legal options to include the employee use of deferred parking spaces. He also suggested there be some communication plan to acknowledge the innovative storm water management that Menards is proposing. Grimes added that the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission may like to coordinate with Menards as well Waldhauser referred to the conditions of approval in the staff report and summarized that condition number six should be modified to state that there shall be no snow storage. Condition number seven should be modified to state that the buff color being proposed shall be used on the front and sides of the building, however, only the front will be brick stamped. The sides and rear can be raked concrete. She added that she would also like to add a condition added to consider a more attractive facade on the southwest corner. Kluchka said he voted no on the Preliminary Plan because it did not meet four of the narrative conditions and he will be voting the same way for this plan to reiterate that point. He said he believes the use of architectural detail would have significant appeal and draw people to the area. McCarty said he understands the Planning Commission's vote is not design oriented but rather to affirm that the Final Plan conforms to Preliminary Plan approved by the City Council. He said he believes the Final Plan does conform to the approved Preliminary Plan but he has issues with the design and the use of the site. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried 6 to 1 to recommend approval of the Final Design Plan for Menards PU-75, Amendment #3 with the following conditions. Kluchka voted no. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this :approval. These plans were prepared for Menards and include the following: existing pylon sign, front, Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 13, 2010 Page 6 rear, right, and wrought iron fence elevations, warehouse elevations, land survey, grading, drainage and erosion control plan, demolition plan, and utility plan. 2. All recommendations and requirements set out in the memos from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated October 5, 2010 and December 6, 2010 shall become a part of this approval. 3. All recommendations and requirements set out in the memo from Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated December 1, 2010 shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code. The existing pylon sign may remain but cannot be moved or expanded. 5. If the amount of parking on the site is inadequate as determined by Menards management or the City Manager, Menards will take immediate steps to implement a plan (which may include off-site parking and the conversion of a portion of the outside yard area to the north or east of the store building to create additional parking as noted on the plans). 6. No snow storage shall be allowed on the site. 7. The precast panels on the sides of the building shall be the same buff aggregate color as the panels on the front facing Wayzata Boulevard. 8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. --Short Recess-- 4. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Waldhauser gave a report on the Bottineau Transitway open house held on November 29, 2010 at St. Margaret Mary's church. 5. Other Business Waldhauser said she would like the Commissioners to be thinking about issues that could be added to a Planning Commission work plan she working on. Grimes invited the Planning Commission to attend the January 11 Council/Manager meeting where there will be a presentation on senior housing. 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 pm. Lester Eck, Secretary Golden Valley Date: January 5, 2011 To: Planning Commission From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Planning 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) Subject: Informal Public Hearing on Minor Subdivision of Property at 240 Jersey Avenue North -Curt Fretham, Lakewest Maki, LLC., Applicant Summary of Request Curt Fretham, Lakewest Maki, LLC., is proposing to subdivide the property located at 240 Jersey Avenue North into two separate lots. The existing home at 240 Jersey Avenue will remain in place on the newly created northernmost lot. The existing detached garage will be removed. City Code requires that each new lot meet the required 10,000 square foot minimum lot size standard set forth by the Zoning Code. For this proposal, the northern-most lot would consist of 11,572 square feet of land and the southern-most lot would consist of 10,376 square feet of land. City code also requires that at least 80 feet of width exists at the front setback line of any newly established lot. In addition, both proposed properties exceed City requirements. Setback boundaries (building envelopes) of the proposed lots would allow generous-sized homes to be constructed without variances. Qualification as a Minor Subdivision The proposed two lot subdivision qualifies as a minor subdivision because the property located at 240 Jersey Avenue North is part of a recorded plat. In addition, this proposed subdivision will produce fewer than four lots and will not create need for public improvements (such as street construction.) The applicant has submitted the required information to the City that allows for the request to be evaluated as a minor subdivision. Staff Review Staff has evaluated this lot subdivision request as a minor subdivision. As previously indicated, this request creates two lots that each exceeds the minimum lot requirements in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. The applicant has submitted a survey for the affected property following subdivision. The survey includes setback boundaries and lot layout following lot division. This document provides the City with information necessary to evaluate the minor subdivision. The document indicates the preservation of the existing home. City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, has submitted a memorandum dated December 29, 2010 regarding recommendations from the Public Works Department concerning this request. Requirements set forth in Mr. Oliver's memo are to be included in the recommended action of this subdivision. Qualification Governing Approval as a Minor Subdivision According to Section 12.50 of the City's Subdivision Regulations, the following are the regulations governing approval of minor subdivisions with staff comment related to this request: 1. Minor subdivisions shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the requirements of the appropriate zoning district. Both proposed lots will meet the requirements set forth by the R1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. 2. A minor subdivision may be denied if the City Engineer determines that the lots are not buildable. The City Engineer has determined that both proposed lots are buildable. 3. A minor subdivision may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it is determined by the City Engineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems by the addition of the new lots. A developer would be required to submit detailed plans regarding the proposed sewer and water locations at the time building permits are applied for. The City Engineer has indicated in his memorandum that the sewer line to the existing home may be used, upon upgrade to City standards. A new sewer line must be created for the home on proposed Lot 2. In addition, it appears that the water service to the existing home on proposed Lot 1 will be partially located on proposed Lot 2 following subdivision. In order to accommodate this water service, the City Engineer has recommended that an easement between the lots be established. This will take place upon approval of the final plat. 4. Approval of the minor subdivision may require the granting of certain easements to the City. The final plat must show all necessary easements as required by the City Engineer and City ordinances. 5. If public agencies other than the City have jurisdiction of the streets adjacent to the minor subdivision, the agencies will be given the opportunities to comment. No other public agencies have jurisdiction of the streets adjacent to this site. 6. The City may ask for review of title if required by the City Attorn~ regarding the dedication of certain easements. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 7. The minor subdivision may be subject to park dedication requirements. A park dedication fee of $1,400 (1% of estimated land market value) shall be paid by the applicant prior to final plat approval. 2 Recommended Action The Planning Department recommends approval of the minor subdivision with the conditions listed below: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. The City Engineer's memo, dated December 29, 2010, will become part of this approval. 3. A park dedication fee in an amount of $1,400 shall be paid prior to by the applicant final plat approval. 4. A Subdivision Agreement will be drafted for review and approval by the City Council that will include issues found in the City Engineer's memo dated December 29, 2010. 5. All applicable City permits must be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. Attachments: Location Map (1 page) Memo from City Engineer Preliminary Plat (2 pages) Jeff Oliver dated December 29, 2010 (2 pages) 3 ..._....~ ~~---.-s------ - 1 ,_~-_,-__-- `° 6657 }' 6495 ~,y~AE.N4fN1~4F1iV~Y.r-,---~ 454 ~ l ~ . ttiGlt'~AV55 t9LS".~-~-.-- 6~E1 '- \..~} ' 6820 ~ `~. 5837 ~~ .,340 5481 t 59x31 5.921 ~' ?(IfiCiSC(3~1C~'kS'Y 5475 ~~ ti~ 7445 7440 7041 ~`.,, X6834 ~` ? 435 430 .- 5484 ~,'~. ~ 5$1"7 5817 5478 ~ r ...°"'` 7'031 565fl ~' } ` 72011 7182 - 28 5840 i,.•`f 425 4~ 5473 5455 15458 690d 6830 415 7155 7145 742,5 _ ~-~---~~ Axa~...~^~,/~sezci ~ aul '"° ~'~~~~,c ~~ 6~4~.,~J. 5855 5845 '.~-~at~ ~ti. ~ -.-~'~sr~'+~c '`- 5814 ~ 5451 6835 - - HI{C::?k©AVE ~._ ___ __,_ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ 6635 340 -:. ~'~ 6910 6904 ~ ~``---r----- 31.5 3Z5 5945 5815 5~5 ~ :.. , 5838 .,4 ry.. 336 ^*.._ "^~.- 5$21'1 "`~ 5929 28 6941 -"•..•--•,._ ~"°•' 245 320 ``• 6736 5925 105 y`"`'~,..w ~t 4~`'~., ~r ~ ~ 5716 I+ Subject Property; ~...,, ~57~ ---- 225 240 Jersey Ave N ,~ Ff!'f~' ~ ~``'-~._ 5634 `'`, 'J~ 549 157'41 ~~ `-.,~ 5614 205 _ "` x15 `''.. 224 231 22<I 243 225 5741 ~'`-,, ~ 2111 151 ~..S~I3~ ~e~l-~ € `*u - of 240 205 ~ 2Wi 131 IfiO ZOS ~ ~~.~ ~`, ~ 200 5573 ~`* t 150 155 1541 rn 145 ."'".. ., .. ~ 1'25 ~` 130 > 140 135 , n 130 ,' i +C 3 y 1~ 135 134 125 125 to ~_~ _: e,~ ~ 1z6 ~ 121 120 6 120 ~." m ~~ ~5a5 m 120 175 120 115 115 ~~~" 110 ~ t 114 ' l0 115 110 101 ' 105 110 ~ j It 6820 / ~- 70411 1+004 4 5944 6900 100 5840 55 ~ ~ j ~~ + G~30 .. c~ Esi'ER.PIAVE m ? .. 1 mm - -. .. ~....-_ -°"'~y~ 35 311 ~ 35 341 ~ ~ 557fl 56311 53G0 ~~ 7 s ~ ~ ~ 5534 w ~ , ~ ~ .-, -; :~ ~ 1x.55 50 ( SS ~ 6 ~.y~ r `Golden Valley Date: December 29, 2010 Public Works 763.593.8030 1763.593.3988 (fax) To: Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Subject: Minor Subdivision at 240 Jersey Avenue North Public Works staff has reviewed the proposed minor subdivision of property located at 240 Jersey Avenue North. The proposed subdivision, which. is located immediately south of Glenwood Avenue, consists of splitting an existing lot into two lots. There is an existing home on the property that will remain on Lot 1, and an existing garage that will be demolished on Lot 2. The property being subdivided was originally subdivided in 1999 and asingle-family home was constructed on the newly created lot at the intersection of Jersey Avenue and Glenwood Avenue. The preliminary plat submitted for review must be revised to include a 10-foot wide drainage and utility easement on the rear lot lines. The existing home on this property is currently served by City sanitary sewer and water. New sewer and water services will be needed to provide service to Lot 2. These services must be extended from the sanitary sewer and watermain within Jersey Avenue, and must be installed according to City standards and specifications. Based upon the information provided by the developer, it appears that the water service to the existing home on Lot 1 will be partially located on Lot 2 following subdivision. In order to accommodate this water service, an easement between the lots will be required. The developer must submit a legal description for this easement to the Public Work Department and an easement document will be prepared by the City. This easement must be signed and be ready for recording prior to forwarding the final plat to the City Council for approval. The existing home on Lot 1 must comply with the Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance. The home has met the inspection requirement and an escrow agreement has been entered into with the City for the repairs to the sanitary sewer service required for compliance. The developer must complete the repairs and obtain the required Certificate of Compliance prior to issuance of permits for the demolition of the existing garage. G:\Developments - Private\240 Jersey North\Review 122910.doc The developer will be required to obtain Right-of-Way Management Permits for the work proposed within the right-of-way for Jersey Avenue. The work includes excavation for the sanitary sewer and water services, driveway construction, sidewalk modifications, driveway aprons, and retaining wall modifications. This development is also subject to the Stormwater Management Ordinance. Therefore, permits will be required for the demolition of the existing garage, construction of a new garage (if applicable) on Lot 1, and new home construction on Lot 2. The construction of a new home on Lot 2 will also require a Tree Preservation Permit. Public Works staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision on 240 Jersey Avenue North subject to the comments and conditions discussed within this review, and the comments of other City staff. C: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator Mitch Hoeft, Engineer G:\Developments - P~ivate\240 Jersey North\Review 122910.doc 1 "w. ~~' ~" ~1 4` `4 1 MH t„J N `j`4,,, ~ I 1 D ~~ ~.. } .~ Hydrant ~ ~ ~ f ~~! BM U ( ~ `r ~ `' ~. ~ catch-~ I Bosr Owner: Carol J Riley, trustee ~~ r.__.J ~~ I i r~ Owner: Bruce K Libby V J i Drive (\~ `e/ ^~ _ Drive ~ Owner; L W Gardino! J Bueghly ~~ _~ 6~ I I C? catch Basin ! ~_ (~ ~~ ~ i ~ ~~~ $g. ai ~ ~' h 91 'b~ ~~ C7 `~ ~ .~. ~J ~ ~.. ~W ~i Iz~ ~W ~~g~ 'I . I ~~ 'i ~ E 1 Son MH 4g~ry r ttt ~' 1 I~ DWI ~~ ~$g~h ~~~~~ c> v a X ~^~ ~,. ~, ~~~ ~~ ~~~ `'~ ~\" ~ ~. ~. ~~ f~ t ~. ~~, Owner: Hammer Residence, Inc ~~ ~~~` House No 30Q o~ntiO ~3 x o,°~' _. x~' __ -_... ~ pQ~~ Q~' 0 M9 ~_ II N __.. °` House No 2 "~ Note: Building height to mld Ypoint of dormer is .y s9'f3. fsmposed building setback of 14.5 feet. rv ~---. - A I ~• ~ a°ry• x 3 0 ~~ `' ~ 9'44 2___'E ~ ~ K 1 ._.. ~ __._ _ bituminous dr ~~ Garage O~ ~. ~~ ~ t to be removed}- . of ~~ ~.~ Y ti t~ _""" "'"' ""-" °~a xg~ x00 ~J __ ~~ IT O tf} C° t i ~ ~ IIw C ~~1 x 1Y V v; v~ ~ ghQ m za. Owner: Steven C Mick r ~~ ~°~ `~,, x Garage ~~ Y V~ ~~\\\/ ~../ rhea ~ 7 6 ,~a'~` x ~ x~ Sao ~~~ 0~6 ~f House Na 220 ,~ 00~ 4r°j~~ O • °} 1 x 0. ~} Owner: Marilyn p Martian x~ x'~ J I i ~~ ~ ~- I ,~~ l ~ `~-- f 1 --c...,., ~c2 ~ _.._.., ._.~ .._,` _. x90 _._._ xg _.,_, ~~ y~ •t ~~ ~__~ ~~ _~ _.,~~ ~~ ~coU~~ ``.,. --,-._.__.~ ~ ~ ~cFiv~,n~aRo,~~ ~~ 1 ~`~~~ Osnu: aerol d Alley. tcu.lea O B8 z ,.. I Ormr a~uca M Lbbt f~ -- - ~ ~ thmx: L w cnc~l a 69 ERETHAM ELEVENTH ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT 6FS6RlPitON ,~~,,\ Lot 2, 91ACfc f, MILLS JERSEY AVENUE A04)iION, occoN'inq to the rccardnd plpk thercCF. \, ~~ TOTAL AREA = 21948 Square Faet n"' a as w ea ~E/~ I ~„ oeamaaw, d p„ aAaape ,~,,,, OWNER: LAKEWEST MAKL LLC `J .`~ en uih bt m+ loved ah ih. r,.t run POST UEVELAPMENl L01 AREAS 15400 HIGHWAY 7 `O) hYEIIUF lD~tgM, rNeh 6 aMImW to 1 ~ a ~t ~ ~ r, ~ MINNEiONKA MN 55,345 aara a DroMp or NOt'97i719. Lot i, 61oek i 11572 Sgacara Feet f i I ~~~~~, Oamr. Rernmer R C Mc ~ Lat 2, 6kCk 9 < 16376 Squara foci 1 7 ~R1 p ? Nwea W 300 dNp ~ >i~ ~~~ t dR ~+ ty ENGINEER: 644RTY CAMPION (a) I a ~! CAMPiON ENGINEERING SERWCES, INC ~~ ~ ~ '~ 'W 65~ > der ~ GOLDEN VALLEY 5U8DNISION STANDARDS 18tlO PIONEER CREEK CENTER ,? p PRESENT ZONING - R i P fl BOX 249 r 1 ~ ~~- R i ~ y MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 ! ~ S fi Onoln.irn mcro~ment io~nd 4 ~',, ~ ! t ~~ ~ $ ~ + [y,~ ~y, ~. ( ' 0 6mrotea t/2 Inr1i py N &~:n uen Arq xt LfUIWUfA B1UtDING SEI9ACIt5 i ~ 33" mmYed bI Uetine Na 2a329. front - 35 led ~GBnp ~ ~ Raus W 9a I~ I a sates - 12.5 icat SURVEYOR: JEFF BAUSCH ~~ ~ ~~, ' to a PELUNEN tAND SURVEYfNG, INC ,,,,, ~ ~ „ bear - 2fi.5 (oat Emu: ~""' ° ~~"'"°" ts6~ a w aePOr) 18488 202ND CIRCLE L -.. -~ ' ~ P D 80X 35 33`11 HUTCHMSON MN 55354 ~'~,~ LflNINUM fA7 RfOtAREAtENiS ~;I~~Wna ` :g +,•..,._ ~' ' ~ d'~~ ~~ ~ N .... CaroDc ~ Corapr ~~~ Ora6ia~ old WAIy emannnta on eharn Oroz Ataa - 10.666 Sgllortl feal 1 ~ I \\ '" '~ Notx Aakidn4 awiw~fp ra. laVsn Iron NaninPn Oa~m4Y ~~ ~ ~'~ ~ I I wfdtn -t~ rtla saeons) r ww. r« v.ar sofa (EWIZ ~ ~ l Z~ ~ ~J ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~~ ~,~~.'~ i~j j ~ shat 76 ~ c e l LEGEN6 } .~ s ..._~ ...r. ,_~ L.--- ~ Oa'°I°' e'deiNp °spai °{'roti°" ~ >~ ' ,~ p ~ Denalaa eshAFg aaiaebr wAaa I r e..,91 I Bdnp B Tee! in titlh aad odll~ka bt Mss -r ~_- t'~ f~ f Hnuu 1~ 77a aM bdrtfi 13 feetin .idC. a~M ndidnln9 06a1.7NAAa - A02 ___^..~... Denotas edeAroh contour Me f , ~ I ~ efreei r~M a> a%s {4 Iaol cnabdr IntnMlj ~„.n raR pW M hydmnt of swdhMderly pCmet I ( ~ er„er. ~3n n uoabn~ ~ ~ j of Jeiuy hwnue tine Ol.nrmtl kNnuw -_ .----- 6wnlea pv6 a {polar 75 ~ ~~' 6+w~ W ndAea _..._ i Denolen Proposed mhirnum bap&aA nllak Ana I __ _ I ~~ ~ _....-~~_~.._.._- Pmaia: smslay uarv { -MM-- Ocmia ratwmain I I 1 kan6S eWy Toot Wa Swwy; Plan w _p._a--:a----p---a Oenain andeN~nd pm Yoe ` 6.pep tt ~d Mme aar~w~dret! I ~•--•••.,.••---~•-...~--,,.~~T..~ 1_j,__.,_.~_.. 5~ vuWer im Mn d an Siola d _t_c-.,c--•a:-...c OereW widrryieuna rircMk Wn I i fib ( ~ dearoy R Rom rM bndan d undue udApn Mrn m tNs sarvy I Ootr oen p: 9070 Ile. No. 2x309 on app,mi3natr and as bred ne Add ipmlkna ~ NcMe aftuetures. mmunpe pbeed nn fin Around ar IMamnOon P~dad b! vadm afiMv avmpanlae rerpundrg to a CapM1U 9tala Ona A, iks,et No. f WOf ia62 `Golden Valley Planning 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: January 5, 2011 To: Planning Commission From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Subject: Rezoning 8805, 8905, 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Boulevard from "Industrial" to "Commercial" Background In May of 2010, the Metropolitan Council approved the City of Golden Valley's Comprehensive Plan. State Statute requires that the City's zoning designations correspond with the General Land Use Plan Map, which is a component of the Comprehensive Plan. By law, zoning designations must correspond with the General Land Use Plan map within one calendar year of its approval by the Metropolitan Council. Based upon the land use designations on the General Land Use Plan Map, there are eight areas within the City that must be rezoned in order to comply with the General Land Use Plan Map. Six of the areas involve residential areas, while two of the areas are involve non-residential properties on or near the I-394 highway corridor. The City Council has directed staff to pursue rezoning the non-residential areas at this time. The Council will continue to study the implications of rezoning residential areas, and pursue that action at a later time. Proposal One of the two non-residential areas that must be rezoned to comply with the General Land Use Plan map is the area in the southeast corner of Interstate 394 and U.S. Highway 169. This area, which includes the properties at 8805, 8905, 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Boulevard, is currently zoned "Industrial." The properties are proposed to be rezoned as "Commercial." By designating this area as "Commercial" on the General Land Use Plan map, the City has implied that it envisions long-term commercial use on this site. Auto dealerships and repair shops, which currently exist in this space, are considered conditional uses in both the Industrial Zone and the Commercial Zone.. Therefore, rezoning the properties will not negatively impact the current businesses or create non-conforming uses. Rezoning will, however, guide future development should the existing businesses leave the area. Recommended Action Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval for the rezoning of the properties at 8809, 8905, 9191 and 9393 from "Industrial" to "Commercial." Attachments Location Map (1 page) General Land Use Plan Map (1 page) ~ ~ m .o ~ Z ~ f _ Va ` 1 v ~-,_- _ ~ ... ~ ~ 1 ~-- ~~ w M Subject Pr ,~ ti ~~ ~ ~~ r~ ~ ~ V1I9I3~,tT 8I3'Jh __ 4V8!'I~Y1~4vTCJW~ ~ IM~~~`S"~~TE E6I~9+~TI~N~ HWY ~`~ K ~ t~y~ ~ f i i' ff ~ '~c~j ,,~ ~l .. ~ fl ~b9~ ~~f ~~/ '~~ ~ if ~ ~., f•,.• f _ 4 r,, Fir ~ ~€ d C; ~,. i~P ^lt:. ~ C1'. ?rcaA4~ Ctgtyryy^@,Ci AvE I r 2U1 General Mills tk~rrd > ..~ q w ~~. C ~`_. k~~ ~ -, r~ J ~~'; ~Srt~~a}c~f~lvd ~t~rr~r~t3rtify C~nt~~r ~ ~~e~[€ Cdiurst+ ~~~ ~ ~ m ~~a ~_~:~ ~, a 1 - ~ _ ~~ ~~i t_~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ w ~ ~-~-L1... iii ~' BOdItB livenste Pond ~-} ~•------t._ operties ~,~~pond ~-. ~~ ~ m 0 ~+V I3~S4'i'43 t36 HWYi G y S ~ `-- "- ~ Pond '~ '~-1 '~4j~ ~ ~~~ I ~ ~~r~.. .]rte Wesdvuood lake 1 ~} l /f . L~_.,~ is s~ss:~:t~ I ~ ' F~I`i!1, I I E ~ a I I ~~;.,e J~ ~' skdo'~w~ I h r.N I : _ I I ~i ~ ~ ~t~ ~, I ~, ~ ~ ~'ill`~-~1 ~ § ~-ib i,~ j I P~ r ~ I i = tho s N t g ~ i 3 ~+n ~ .I '' l I I p] ~ i ~ t° r 1-}, ti I ~ I ~~ I I ~( j I ~ Go,-~ - - OI LY (71 :r 11111'LI .II; i (1111)ltl(151\I t ~„ ~~ ~."-~~- --- -- 117 am - -------- - ~ _ - _ ~ J --- t P v~r, ~ ~. ~,_~, L F ,„I ~ -;n k ~', rII ,I ioult s~1ll ~. }} ~ I { f 3 u ~ a~ -------•-- - I S 9 5. ~ NNa' u. .c ~~ -- f ~` ~ .~,rW,~,~M~ s~~9& w r ~ 1 e ~~. ~ I 9 ~ iI / a mans t, ~,„ F .- ~ ~ , ~,~ fAUMw 1 Z . - w L - ~ ow LOW ~. r 7PaY - I Z T .e q~, ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~e f1 ~ L 'r I - I a I ~ ~' l:_ .. n .earn ~ ~ ~.Tk 1 I <. ~,-a ~. , l l l Z~ - S - s~.u ~, 1~ ~~ I~ y4~L ~~~ a.~..rn ~ ~ MnW.NYe ~ ~ -M ~ Lie ~ e1 Pn4 1 . .. v `s •Y* i PeM ~ ~ _ v V I r -, I - ~ d's" W - a e 3 . x iI 1 ~ - o • ~ ~ Y I I ~oAn.. ..,ICI ; ' - `.. e.-n. ~-~ ~~, ~gCyl % ~0 f. (~Fegional Park j i c-. ; I I i , _ ° M.a ,„an ~1~ ! t _ M s Park 8 Rec Board ~ .. of ',~~ ~~ ~~ 1 w.. 5~ ~ \~V ~ ...psi h I 3 ~ ~~ ~ .,~ ~~~ ~ __ -1 . ._.. , ee,.ma• a~ a ~ ... - a ~ i ~ 3 ~ ~, ,. _ ~~ »~, ~ i .I , E 4 " ~~ ... -- _ __ - _ ; - ,-- __ , , ~' - e ~; a y _ Y}_ Unl JI ~./~ a 4.~ ~~ ~ i I )~ smaw. ~' _ ~ ~ . ~ _. -~ ... S s ~ ~ _ ,., r : i ifi i ~fG`r I n kgrmu WN.M a w' ..,. 56 -~„~~,iw~e _.. e '' i I 4 ~ a°' 2r~ ~ ~ ~~ om"~ r i I ~;, a ,e.. ~~ .,~ I ~ w.~~µ ~ t ~~u~~ ~' t j ~~ Lake - - i ~ v- ~ ., ~% f~~~1//~~\o\~ ~ °°" L~ ~ 4~t p~ w., S ;~. e e ~ vC g~ - s ~ ~1~ ~ ~'~ / i~yeu - ~ ~~ / AaRLauw U _ 4 .,,„ 1 ~ ~ 'J ~ WkAN e ~ i ~ ~R,e J 8 ~ 1 ~ PM r (~y J Subject Properties - ~~_ . - ~~ ~~~~ ; ~: ~ ~ ~ r,.f.a, ~ .,. ~ ~~ a ~ ,. > : , • F _ t swn.e a w... ~ .s' .. c, ~ t ; r ..r ~~. 1 w s.. / ~ ~d O ~.. - - - ~/ / ~ ~;/. ~// ~ ,. 4 w /~ ~ ~~~ ~r r~~ ~ / ~% i/ ~ iii//% ~ h.. ~~,,, G e _ F~~~, , ~ tT.... 5.I A----.--Westwood ~---~.._.._._ ,-,~.,.e. I Lake ahr or sr. hook eaue Ihh. \~ I C O i't ,.V9r~l wn G I I $ ~a'e ~. '' i/ ~..e f ciryoraomanvSlay ~ ~ `•~ ~ S~l~~~., ~ ~ ~r'OWgIB 7edo cameo vanes Raad I , Golden Valley, MN 65427-4588 I Sourh Lake 7835a3~8tle5 i ~..~.. ~' ry~m w.ci goltlen-velleymnus ----+~--.ti_ PeN` J i Z z f~ t~ galley 2010.2030 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN Residential LOW Densty (Less thanSunBSperacre) 0 Medium-Low Density (s to its oohs peracre) MedlUm-Hlgh DenSlty (t2tots.9undsperacre) !~ Hlgh DenSlty (2o or moreunASperacre) Commercial 0 Office ®RetaillServlce (alsoincmdesOffice) Industrial Light Industrial (also includesOfice) ® Industrial (also indudes Ofice) Mixed cUse a Open Space - Puhlic antl Pnvale Ownership Schools and Religious Facilities a PUbIIC F2CIIIt12S - Miscellaneous - Seml-PUbIIC FBCIIIt12S - Miscellaneous Open Watef -eased on z9oeAedal Photography Wetland$ -National Wetlands Inventory, Barr Engineering, and HR Green 1999 SWMP - not fieltl verlfietl D Railroad Road Rights-of-Way -- Private Streets - Municipal Line D t. D h 4.2008 H qnC My Surveyors Office for Property lines t20tl8) -DNR HRG n Bsrt Fng~ering (w Wetlands CNyol Golden Vallayfor aN Olherleyers. 80a BW 16W ? ~ I'.lMapslGeneralLandllsePlan2010-2tl30_24x38.ptlf e Go9den Valley Planning 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: January 5, 2011 To: Planning Commission From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Subject: Rezoning 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, 1400 Highway 100 South and 1500 Highway 100 South from "Commercial" to "Business and Professional Office" Background In May of 2010, the Metropolitan Council approved the City of Golden Valley's Comprehensive Plan. State Statute requires that the City's zoning designations correspond with the General Land Use Plan Map, which is a component of the Comprehensive Plan. By law, zoning designations must correspond with the General Land Use Plan map within one calendar year of its approval by the Metropolitan Council. Based upon the land use designations on the General Land Use Plan Map, there are eight areas within the City that must be rezoned in order to comply with the General Land Use Plan Map. Six of the areas involve residential areas, while two of the areas are involve non-residential properties on or near the I-394 highway corridor. The City Council has directed staff to pursue rezoning the non-residential areas at this time. The Council will continue to study the implications of rezoning residential areas, and pursue that action at a later time. Proposal One of the two non-residential areas that must be rezoned to comply with the General Land Use Plan Map is the area in the southwest corner of Interstate 394 and State Highway 100. This area, which includes the properties at 5075 Wayzata Boulevard and 1400 and 1500 Highway 100 South, is currently zoned "Commercial." The properties are proposed to be rezoned to "Business and Professional Offices." The properties are currently under the ownership of Duke Realty, Inc., and are intended to be used for the development of office buildings as part of the West End mixed-use development area. Duke's Preliminary PUD plans have been approved by the City that reflects this development plan. Duke has stated that the market for office space in the Twin Cities has slowed, and development of this site will occur later than originally anticipated. Traffic analyses completed by Duke at the time of Preliminary PUD approval indicated that this site would be most appropriately used for office development. Commercial/retail development on the site (as currently allowed by zoning) would create a negative impact in traffic in the area. Rezoning the property to "Business and Professional Office" will reflect the plans by Duke and the City. Recommended Action Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval for the rezoning of the properties at 5075 Wayzata Boulevard and 1400 and 1500 Highway 100 South from "Commercial" to "Business and Professional Offices." Attachments Location Map (1 page) General Land Use Plan Map (1 page) 2 .. 5a11 ~ 5$Oi 5231 521 5Y11 5i21 , ~ •-'''+16fi9 ..___ 5311~,~„ ~~ :5111 5101 J'"" '`~,~~/ , 5347' s41i ~: ,~ 54~i4 f~ , ; •... _ ... NS '##1!~'Yi00 5 TCS W81394 __ _ _. ~B 1iWY14~i 3'ffY tAfiO I39~i ^.... 1.N7~R9Td4T~ 394 _ _ 394 ::: ~E~tST/t7`E 394 - 26B FtiVY3t3i1 ~ Tt} EB I334 .. - ..._ _ E8 I394 TCf !~~ Fitl~YSfl4 5 y.~® rb CS "~ ~''%' ~ ~yK ~~ 1915 ~~~ ~~ ~ ~' ~ fr _ ~ f /iaz~u,i~ ta~5 Subject Properties ~ /~,.',,, .;~ ~`/~ ia25 ~~~~~~ ~ .~' ~ ta35 ta~4 ~'~~~ .` ~~ ~ ia35 q~ ~ 1450 laa5 1454 %' yy. i ~ x..~ p ~ 1A45 :'.!,/ r'(~ i ~ ~ "`~ a 1,514 x545 1510 ~" 1.545 f. f ~,/,r,f ~ ,~~ ~ ,~~ ~ 1515 a5m ~~ is25 i ~,: iris l 1540'/x' ~ ~ ap ¢.. ;` ~~~` ~ s' * ~, 15zs 1534 ~ is35 1534 is19 / 'F O `~ r~i f.{~ f"' [Ce~ ~ 1535 i54D Q 1545 1'S4fl i535 ~~fr/` ~ ,zi ~ ,1534 `~ -.''. ~; $' ~ i515 8840 15#9 155th S~'fd1 situ,,:: csyr_d~~t(s:ci+.t ~c ~^.~Cz;~-.te'xii(Gi,~. ~:FJS I i _ i ! - i~ _' I ... I - ~ ~~ ~/ I V'~ u , I i ',~11~Ir b _ I ~ f °j~P ~ ~ - ~~~ I 1 ~. r - ' ~' ~ I ~ ~ `~ I 2010.2030 I~ ' ` _ ~ ' ',~ GENERAL LAND USE PLAN f III tsl '; Ill 11111'1 III 111 "~r1y II~~' i ~ li', ',I ll I ,&am~wtl'. I ~:. ~~ ~ I . ~ ~ ) ~ i~ k~. I~.,, - ~,Ir UI al~~aa ~I:~II _, Residential -. I '..,.~.~` .,,,, ~ ~ ~~, i ~~._ ~ ~. - OW OenSI~+ (Lesslhen6unds per acre) ' w..~ J Q tee, -}- a ., ~; I I r _ ,, r{ ~ ~ ~ I ~ Medium-LOW Density (S IO 11.8 units per acre) I - ~7 ~~ ? r ..,...,. d I ~ I sx.w°~y sa a :. s a z ~ ~ L a I emirWUU w~a, UUU ,1' 8. '•• ray eei ' µW ~1 I ~ E ,~„~, ~~ ~* ~ ", y y It ter j ~ MetllUfTl-Hlgh ~2nSlty (121o199unilsperacref r ~_- " " "^h I ~ ~ @ -.. I mmy~ _ W~y~ ~ ,~~ i ,.rte .,' ~ :,. - I p, y a, "" p I ' ~. ®Hlgh OenSlty (2o or more units per acre) f ~ .. _ y\1 I ~ . L'.~ lV ,: } ro,,, ~ ~ feso'. I ew I - < , - I ~ (j ~ C ~ ,. n Naa y I ' ,~r~.Y .~ r a o, ~ CC (~ CI ~ > ~ 1=1 ~ ;~ '~l ~ ~ f °~~ ~, ' ~ Commercial ~-~ ~ e a,xe~ u oe ~ + ~r ~~ ~ , ~'- ~ e m °~ ~ ~.r ~ ~ Off ce ~, Medicine a~ M - w. ;" rµwarp ',.. T r . ~ Vi y"° ~ Hr Lake I xonmwe ~- ~~II~I~ ~~ = xve,°ro °~~ "~ ' `" ,.-~ ° ~~ RetalliSeNlCe (also includes office) ..~ , - t j , azv ~ ••. - ,w~.,,. , d,~ 1 = u.~°,. J---yll ~ ••JJ//.((LL Industrial .~. p s°a ~ a I. v i ~ ~~,,, . . ~ am°nsaP° ~ fUnwMe ` a<,m eA 3 ' Y~~~ I t _:l w i ~.11i I t~ ~ , aw,a.~ _.. `~~ .' ~~ ~ ~ g Industrial f omdudes0 ~ a ,. ~ ,.~ ~ »~°° ~ LI ht as Bce ,. ( - - .. , J ~i ' IndUStrlal (also includes ORlce) pr ~7~ I, Mixed Use I ~ ~ °~ .,_c.: ~. "'ec' ~ '~-~ ~F ~ I I I ~.I,, if I .~~1 s _ a - ~ _ Ce~ I . t 9~~ ~ Region I Park o ~ as ~ ~ g ~ 0 I I . I ~ a .,> >~m.m ~..e .,~ ~~ ~ h (Mills PerkBRec Board) .: I d-- (-V {^ -~_ ~~ lye V ~ Open Space-Puhlicand Private Ownership I .~ r ,. ~. m.,~ J L ,~", I j a~, ,, I ~ ^ ~/ °~° ~c `"' I' 0 Schools and Religious Facilities Pa~ 'a roo M ~ y I ~"`°'""" ° "Km°-n a 3 3 ~ PUt)IIC F2CIIItIeS - Miscellaneous be. ~;, b ~ f ~I g •. ~ I e°°e, ` ! ' emi Public Facilities M ll I ~ r --., ; ,~ ,,,,, r,~, - Isce aneous n. . e .. ! - .: ~~ I ~ ~ • ~,, ,. _. __.~ v = G -~ -._-. _, _ F ?~~ I 1 ;~ I v.: ~4 C i L I r _.. 4 ~ I I ~ , ., , ~ rt :- ' p n Water ~ ~ ~.e. ' ~.~~ ~ i _ ~I O e - Based on 20E8 Aerial Photography f, V / _ ~ s~~ r ,~ - % Wetlands - National Wetlands Inventory, Barr Engineering, k _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ v `~ and HR Green t999 SWMP-not fieldverifetl u.. I 56 M~. ~,~, ,~~ ~ ~, .>m „, -_ a ~ D Railroad f ~.,., ~ j I ~ I i IQ S -I i - ~ d >s ~. ~' S ~ .~. 55 A ., ~ _ ~ 1_ m p ~,,.,, ~a ,7.rr , Road s-of- y `` ` ~ ~ ~o.ea e,`- I . j < ~,~~ ~ ~ , . ~, I ~, ~ ~ ,~ ~ e ~. ~. Right ,.. „~.: ~~ , j r ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ „.. ~>.. t a. ,~ Wirth I _. Private Streets Wa ~ ~~ a~ ~;, .arrr #~ a - ,, ,~ - ~ ~ a~=s~ ~ # d ~ ~ Lake I _ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ L`r° f - I ^~ m, ~ ~ ~ ~ »,. ,,.~~„ ~ e 1 ~ ~ I Muni p I Line r ~~ ~, - _~.. I : ti~ ~ci a . N~ y . ,~ _ o _ »w _ _ ~ ~~ ~ e0 , , ~ _ ~ ~ ' „~w ~i i n I I. n ` Brwl.~bw ' &a°xrbx '. 1 ~ N ~~ N ~..e: l ~ _ I ~ 1,~ ' _ ymrmmAwnw c t f~ ~ R '. ,~,~~ .. <.. I, ~ 1 + ~ ,. ~ - e _ 0 ! -De°ember4, 2008 -~ - Moray d I1 ~ ~ I - _--- ~ U _ a~ (~ ate ~ ~ _ f I •'~ ~~, ~ _.' ~.., < _ Hennepn coumrsurverors orfice ror Fmperty Lines lzaofil 1 -~-..' ~v.:.,~~.~- - E: "~ ~.. : a ~ '. "e' = r~x 1~dw l"~QJ, ~ ONR HR Green Bart En9neenn9 /w Wetlands _ I D e., I, i~oe ~ - L d. ~.~ ~ aM '°v° ~*"" •~~~~" P~ i -Cltya(G°Iden Velleykr eNOroerlerers. I i ~ ~ _ ~ wo wo ° eoo laoo x.wo e _ I 1\ .: M I _ '~ i I ~, I ~~ a,~ ~~ ~ < i ;,,~ i ~~. app ~~.. - E - eP' w '/ ~ ~ I I I ~ ` ~ ~ .. / I ~$ n4 -. SI. LOUIS f.\I~A WESiW00d w.,A, e.a , Lake ___._~_ i QiY OF SI. LOCIS i'.y G.. ~ I ~: - - ~~~~- I 5<' r _~,., ,y, Ta:a, y ~? IS 4"L ~~efG°I°°nVal~y Subject Properties .~ ~ •J } ' ~'~ ~~ 9x '` ~ Brownie leaoc°menvao a°ad comae vauea luN s6a27 asee I swm Lake 763-5938095 _ - 1fm: I xww ergolden-vallaymn.us ~ e"~ I I.LNapslGeneralLendUSe P1an2010.2030 2dz36.pdf vc~~~ec~ `~,~y,°~~~~, ~~~ n ~~;~'t~ ;q To; Planning Commission Members From` Marshall N. Tanck, .Envision Connecfiion Board of Directors Date: December 28, 2010 Re Golden Valley's 125th Anniversary Golden Valley will be celebrating its 125#h anniversary in 2011. The exact date 'rs December 16. However we are planning to celebrate the anniversary throughout 2011 with a series of events,. culminating with a major celebration at the end of the year. A 125~h Anniversary Planning team. has met three times and has generated a lot of ideas ideas far events range from a logo contest to brand the events, which is underway `now, to a student essay`contest, history programs through the historical` society, a history tour, a volunteer service day and many, many more. Some existing activities will have a 125th anniversary component and will be branded with the anniversary logo.. We would like to invite the Planning Commission to have a representative on the planning team. This is less than a one year commitment, with meetings once a month. However, there may be subcommittee meetings at other times. Please contact Sandy alerts, Volunteer Coordinator at swerts@goldenvalleymn.gov or 763-512-2341 with the name of your representative. To receive updates of the planning and events, you can get on a list by going to; www.QOJdenvaLleymn.AOV/news/subscribe/. Golden Valley's 125 Anniversary option is under the subhead "News and Information, We .hope to see you at the planning session.