The URL can be used to link to this page

06-21-11 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber June 21, 2011 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Receipt of Community Partnership Grant from CenterPoint Energy 11-32 3-4 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda -All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting -April 20, 2011 5-12 B. Approval of Check Register 1. City 13 2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 14 C. Licenses: 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement -TwinWest 15-17 Chamber of Commerce Foundation D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Planning Commission - May 9, 2011 18-25 2. Human Services Foundation - May 9, 2011 26-27 E. Authorization to Sign Agreements with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 28-52 (MCES) and Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. for MCES GV-461 Reliever Project F. 2011/2012 Pavement Management Program: 1. Amend Feasibility Report 11-33 53-59 2. Authorization to Sign Agreement with SEH G. Authorization to Sign Letter of Support for the Bassett Creek Regional Trail Boone 60-62 Avenue -TH 100 Transportation Enhancement Grant Application 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Public Item - 2010 National Pollution and Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 63-70 Phase II - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Annual Report to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 11-34 B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #459 -Amending Section 11.23: Medium Density 71-78 Residential Zoning District (R-3) Regarding Allowing Senior and Physical Disability Housing as a Conditional Use C. Public Hearing - First Consideration - Ordinance #460 - Interim Ordinance Imposing a 79-89 Twelve Month Moratorium - Portion of Douglas Drive Corridor- Block 1 and 2, Expressway International Park and Approve Summary Publication 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. On-Sale and Sunday Sale, Liquor License Renewal 90 B. First Consideration - Ordinance #461 -Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council 91-92 Members C. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT oZ� ? 0 �� a e Fire Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098 (fax) , . ��,,� Executive Summary for Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 1. B. Receipt of Gommunity Partnership Grant from CenterPoint Energy Prepared By Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire & Inspections Summary The Fire Department made application for a $500 Community Partnership Grant offered by CenterPoint Energy. The grant will be used toward the purchase of traffic safety cones and safety vests. The safety equipment will be used at highway incidents to alert drivers of the hazard zone that firefighters are working in. A representative from CenterPoint Energy will be at the meeting to present the check. Attachments Resolution Accepting Donation from CenterPoint Community Partnership Grant (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Accepting Donation from CenterPoint Community Partnership Grant. Resolution 11-32 June 21, 2011 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM CENTERPOINT ENERGY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP GRANT WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 04-20 on March 16, 2004 which established a policy for the receipt of gifts; and WHEREAS, the Resolution states that a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. A cash donation must be acknowledged and accepted by motion with a simple majority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accepts the following donations: $500 from CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant, for traffic safety cones and safety vests Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. R �gular Meeting of the ity Council pril 20, 2011 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Hennepin County, Minn sota was held at 7800 Golden Valley Road in said City on April 20, 2011 at 6:30 p.m. � The following members were present: Fteiberg, Loomis, Pentel, Scanlon and Shaffer. Also present were: Thomas Burt, City Manag r; Allen Barnard, City Attorney; and Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant. Approval of Aqenda MOVED by Pentel, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to approve the agenda of April 20, 2011 as submitted. Approval of Consent Aaenda MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Sca lon and motion carried unanimously to approve the . consent agenda of April 20, 2011 as su mitted. *Approval of Minutes - Citv Council IV�eetina - March 1, 2011 and Council/ManaAer Meetinq - March 8, 2011 , MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Sca lon and motion carried unanimously to receive and file the City Council Meeting minutes of arch 1, 2011 and Council/Manager Meeting of March 8, 2011 as submitted. *Approval of Check Reqister MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Sca lon and motion carried unanimously to authorize the payment of the City and Housing an Redevelopment Authority bills as submitted. *Solicitor's License - Clean Water Ac ion MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Sca lon and motion carried unanimously to approve the solicitor's license for Clean Water Actio�i. *Solicitor's License -Window Conce ts of MN Inc. MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Sca lon and motion carried unanimously to approve the solicitor's license for Window Concepts of MN, Inc. Regular Meeting of the City Council April 20, 2011 Page 2 *Minutes of Boards and Commissions MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to receive and file the minutes as follows: Planning Commission - March 14, 2011 Joint Water Commission - February 2, 2011 *Email from Christopher Jordan Reqardina Resiqnation from Human Riahts Commission MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to receive and file the email from Christopher Jordan, dated March 31, 2011, regarding resignation from the Human Services Foundation; and request the Mayor send him a letter of appreciation in recognition for his service to the community. *Email from Joel Shinder Re_yardinct Street and Storm Sewer Issues on Maior Drive MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to receive and file the email from Joel Shinder, dated March 31, 2011, regarding street and storm sewer issues on Major Drive. *Asphalt Overlav - Quotes MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to award the bid for asphalt overlay to the lowest responsible bidder, Midwest Asphalt Corp. for $375,015.15. The bids are as follows: Midwest Asphalt Corp. $375,015.15 Valley Paving, Inc. $401,186.03 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $410,011.54 Rum River Contracting $416,870.60 North Valley, Inc. $429,496.78 GMH Asphalt Corp. $434,781.10 Ace Blacktop, Inc. $442,991.14 Hardrives, Inc. $442,476.98 Astech Asphalt SurFace $473,544.75 C.S. McCrossan, Inc. $503,124.75 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $471,274.20 Regular Meeting of the City Council April 20, 2011 Page 3 '"Sealcoat- Quotes MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to award the bid for sealcoating to the lowest responsible bidder, Allied Blacktop Company for $169,650.00. The bids are as follows: Allied Blacktop Company $169,650.00 Pearson Brothers, Inc. $179,044.50 *Proclamation for National Public Works Week - Mav 15-21 MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to adopt the Proclamation for National Public Works Week. . *Authorization to Sian Third Amended and Restated Joint and Cooperative A�reement for Public Safetv Purchasinq Member Freiberg introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 11-12 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTERING INTO THIRD AND RESTATED JOINT ARID COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURCHASING The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Scanlon and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Freiberg, " Loomis, Pentel, Scanlon and Shaffer; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. *Appointments to Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission and Northwest Communitv TV Board of Directors MOVED by Freiberg, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to appoint Mike Freiberg as the City's representative on the Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission and Tom Burt as the City's representative on the Northwest Community TV Board of Directors. Regular Meeting of the City Council April 20, 2011 Page 4 Continued Public Hearinq - Ordinance #458 - Conditional Use Permit 130 - 7550 Wayzata Boulevard - Neptune Societv, Applicant The following ordinance was MOVED by Pentel, seconded by Freiberg: ORDINANCE NO. 458, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Approval of Conditional Use Permit Number 130 7550 Wayzata Boulevard Neptune Soclety, Applicant David Zavadil, applicant, reviewed the conditional use permit and answered questions from the Council. Les Eck, Planning Commission, presented the Planning Commission report and answered questions from the Council. The Mayor and Council acknowledged Les Eck's service on the Planning Commission and thanked him for his many years of service to the community. Joe Hogeboom, City Planner, presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. Allen Barnard and Thomas Burt answered questions from the Council. The Mayor opened the meeting for public input and persons present to do so were afforded the opportunity to express their views thereon. Hearing and seeing no one, the Mayor closed the public hearing. MOVED by Pentel, seconded by Freiberg and motion carried unanimously to approve Ordinance #458, 2nd Series as amended: Condition #9 to read: There shall be no cremation or embalming on the premises. Upon a roll call vote, the vote was as follows: FREIBERG -YES LOOMIS - YES PENTEL -YES SCANLON - YES SHAFFER - YES Public Hearina - Preliminarv Plat Approval - 6210 and 6224 Wavzata Boulevard - Venture Bank, Applicant Cory Bergman, MFRA, representing the applicant, reviewed the plat. Les Eck, Planning Commission, presented the Planning Commission report. Michael Simmons, Planning Intern, presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. Joe Hogeboom, City Planner, answered questions from the Council. Regular Meeting of the City Council April 20, 2011 Page 5 Public Hearinq - Preliminarv Plat Approval - 6210 and 6224 Wavzata Boulevard - Venture Bank, Auplicant- Continued The Mayor opened the meeting for public input and persons present to do so were afforded the opportunity to express their views thereon. Hearing and seeing no one, the Mayor closed the public hearing. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Freiberg and motion carried unanimously to approve the Preliminary Plat for 6210 and 6224 Wayzata Boulevard lot consolidation subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. The conditions found in the City Engineer's memo, dated March 21, 2011, will become part of this approval. Public Hearinq - Special Assessments - 2011 Pavement Manaqement Area Sue Virnig, Finance Director, introduced the agenda item and answered questions from the Council. Jeff Oliver, City Engineer, Allen Barnard and Thomas Burt answered questions from the Council. The Mayor opened the meeting for public input and persons present to do so were afforded the opportunity to express their views thereon. Brian Anderson, 5160 Colonial Drive, feels he was erroneously lumped into the project because of his address; stated the gas company said he was getting a new gas lines but he is not on the street and his gas line is completely separate from anyone else's; stated his address has changed three times and at one time he had a Glenwood Avenue address; stated if his house had a Glenwood address he would not have to pay for the street because it is a County road; stated he still has the same access to Glenwood that it had 30 to 40 years ago; stated he doesn't own a driveway as he has easements to drive on two properties to get to the street; and stated when he first bought his house he checked to see if he would have to pay for pavement management and thought that because his house had no connection to a street he didn't have to pay; wants to contest the special assessment; stated he has zero feet of curb and gutter; and submitted a written objection contesting the special assessment. MOVED by Freiberg to assess the property at 5160 Colonial Drive at half the value comparable to what some of the corner lots are at $2,875. Motion died for lack of a second. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Regular Meeting of the City Council April 20, 2011 Page 6 Public Hearina - Special Assessments - 2011 Pavement Manaaement Area - Continued Member Pentel introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 11-13 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR STREETS IN THE 2011 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AREA The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Scanlon and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Freiberg, Loomis, Pentel, Scanlon and Shaffer; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. Authorization to Sign Amended PUD Permit - Menard Inc. - PUD No.75, Amendment No. 4 Aaron Morrisey, Menards, reviewed the request to amend the PUD permit and answered questions from the Council. MOVED by Pentel, seconded by Freiberg and motion carried to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the amended PUD permit for PUD No. 75, Menard, Inc., Amendment 4. Council Member Shaffer voted no. Authorizinq Issuance and Sale of: $1,840,000 General Obliqation Improvement Bonds, Series 2011A, $655,000 General Obliqation Equipment Certi�cates of Indebtedness, Series 2011 B and $5,110,000 General Obliqation Improvement Refundina Bonds, Series 2011C Sue Virnig, Finance Director, introduced the agenda item. Member Pentel introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 11-14 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $1,840,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2011A The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Freiberg and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Freiberg, Loomis, Pentel, Scanlon and Shaffer; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. Regular Meeting of the City Council April 20, 2011 Page 7 Authorizinq Issuance and Sale of: $1,840,000 General Obliaation Improvement Bonds, Series 2011A, $655,000 General Obliaation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2011 B and $5,110,000 General Obligation Improvement Refundinq Bonds, Series 2011C - Continued Member Pentel introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 11-15 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $655,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2011B The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Shaffer and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Freiberg, Loomis, Pentel, Scanlon and Shaffer; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. Member Pentel introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 11-16 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $5,110,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2011C The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Scanlon and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Freiberg, Loomis, Pentel, Scanlon and Shaffer; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. Announcements of Meetinqs A Bassett Creek Water Management Commission will be held on April 21, 2011 at 11:30 am. The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Citizen Advisory Committee for will meet at 6:30 pm at the Theodore Wirth Park par 3 course for a walking and/or golf cart tour of portions of the Theodore Wirth Park. The Hennepin County Open Book Meeting will be held on April 26, 2011 from 4 to 6 pm at City Hall. The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Citizen Advisory Committee for Theodore Wirth Park will meet on April 26, 2011 at Minneapolis Park and Recreation Building to discuss the beach area and dog park. Regular Meeting of the City Council April 20, 2011 Page 8 Announcements of Meetinas - Continued Some Council Members may attend the Ron Hammer Retirement on April 29, 2011 at 9:30 am at the Park Maintenance Garage. Some Council Members may attend the Neighbors Helping Neighbors - Spring Cleaning Blitz on April 30, 2011. The next City Council meeting will be held on May 3, 2011 at 6:30 pm. The Bike Rodeo will be held on May 4, 2011 from 6 to 8 pm at the Crystal Community Center. The Step To It Challenge starts May 9 to June 6 and encouraged the citizens to participate. Mavor and Council Communications No action/and or discussion took place. Adiournment The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 7:58 p.m. Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant a� ',� �.. �; ,.� �� ` �/ P Finance O �� N� V 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 3. B. 1. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By � Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments Document sent via email. Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. :o �r /� P Finance O ` .V� N� V 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 3. B. 2. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of check register for various vendor claims against the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Attachments Document sent via email. Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. ;�� \ � . 4. \ City Administration/Council O � �� , e 763-593-8006/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement -TwinWest Chamber of Commerce Foundation Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City to waive the 30-day waiting period. Attachments Application for Exempt Permit (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for TwinWest Chamber of Commerce Foundation. Minnesota Lawfu/Gamb/fng Page 1 of 2 5/11 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Appllcation fee I r An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: less than 30 days ore than 30 days - conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days,and before the event before the event - awards less than$50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. $100 $50 ORGANIZ14TION INFORMATION check# $ Organization name Previous gambling permit number TwinWest Chamber of Commerce Foundation x-04697-10-004 Minnesota tax ID number, if any Federal employer ID number, if any 41-1435676 Type of nonprofit organization. Check one. � Fraternal �� Religious � Veterans �� Other nonprofit organization Mailing address City State Zip Code County 10700 Old County Road 15 Plymouth MN 55441 Hennepin Name of chief executive officer (CEO) Daytime phone number Email address Bruce Nustad 763-450-2220 bruce@twinwest.com Attach a copy of�of the following for proof of nonprofit status. Do not attach a sales tax exempt status or federel employer ID number as they are not proof of nonproftt status. �Vonprotit Articles of Incarporation OR a current Certiticate of Good Standing . Don't have a copy? This certiflcate must be obtained each year from: Secretary of State,Business Services Div., 180 State Office Building,St. Paul,MN 55155 Phone: 651-296-2803 ✓�IRS income tax exemption[501(c)]letter in your organization's name. Don't have a copy? To obta(n a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter,have an organizatlon officer contact the IRS at 877-829-5500. 1, .__'.IRS-Affiliate of national,statewide,or international parent nonproflt organization(charter) If your organization falls under a parent organization,attach copies of 1�th of the following: a. IRS letter showing your parent organfzatlon is a nonproflt 501(c)organization with a group ruling,and b. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organizatlon as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted. For raffles,Iist the site where the drawing will take place. Golden Valley Golf&Country Club Address (do not use PO box) City or townshfp Zip Code County 7001 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley 55427 Hennepin Date(s) of activity(for raffles,Indlcate the date of the drawing) Monday, August 1, 2011 Check the box or boxes that Indlcate the type of gambling activity your organlzatlon wlll conduct: Bingo* � Raffles Paddlewheels* Pull-Tabs* Tipboards* * Gambling equipment for pull-tabs, bingo paper, tipboards, and paddlewheels must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.gcb.state.mn.us and click on List of Licensed Distributors, or call 651-639-4000. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 2 of 2 5/11 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT If the gambling premises is within city limits, If the gambling premises is located in a township, a a city ofFicial must check the action that the city is county official must check the action that the county is taking on this application and sign the application. taking on this application and sign the application. A township official is not required to sign the application. The application is acknowledged with no waiting The appllcation is acknowledged with no waiting period. period. The application is acknowledged with a 30 day me application is acknowledged with a 30 day waiting period,and allows the Board to issue a waiting period,and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days(60 days for a lst class clty). Permit after 30 days. The application is denied. The application,�is denied. Print county name � Print city name ` �� On behalf of the county, I acknowledge [his application. Signature of county personnel receiving appiication On tieh f of the city, I acknowledge this application. Si 'natu e of cjty_pe n I iving applicat(on �� Title Date Title '"` Date � `�' ' � (Optional) TOWNSHIP: On behalf of ti�e townsbip,I acknowledge that the organtzatlon!s applying for exempted gambUng activlty wlthln tbe township limits. [A township has no statutory authority ta approve or deny an application [Minnesota Statute 349.166)] Printtownship name Signature of township official acknowledging application Title Date CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S 5 TURE Print form and have CEO sign The information provided in this applic 7r i mp/ete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be com I r�med [o the Board within 30 days of the date f ur gambling activity. C � /J Chief executive officer's signature Date Complete a separate application for each gambling event: Financial report and recordkeeping • one day of gambling activity required • two or more consecut(ve days of gambiing activity A financial report form and instructions will • each day a rafFle drawing is held be sent with your permit, or use the online fill-(n form available at Send application with: www.gcb.state.mn.us. Within 30 days of the • a copy of your proof of nonproflt status, and activity date, complete and return the • application fee for each event financial report form to the Gambling Make check payable to "State of Minnesota." Control Board. To: Gambling Control Board Questions? Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South Control Board at 651-639-4000. Roseville, MN 55113 This foRn will be made available in altemative forznat(i.e. large print,Braille)upon request. Data privacy notice: The information Your organization's name and p�ate data about your organizatlon are available requested on thls form (and any addness will be public information to: Board members, Board staff whose work attachments) will be used by the Gambling when received by the Board. All requires access to the informatlon; Minnesota's Control Board(Board)to determine your other informaUon provided will be Department of Public Safety;Attomey General; organizatlon's qualiftcatlons to be involved private data about your Commissfoners of Administration, Minnesota in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. organization until the Board Management&Budget,and Revenue; Legislative Your organization has the right to refuse to issues the permit. When the Auditor, national and international gambUng supply the information; howeve r, if your Board issues the permit, all �gulatory agencles; anyone pursuant to court organizatlon refuses to supply this informatlon provided will become order; other Individuals and agencles specificalty informatlon, the Board may not be able to public. If the Board does not authorized by state or federal law to have access determine your organlzation's qualifications Issue a permit, all information to the informatlon; indivfduals and agencies for and,as a consequence,may refuse to issue provided remalns pHvate,with the v�rhich law or legal order authorizes a new use or a permit. If your organization supplies the exception of your organization's sharing of Informatlon after this notice was given; information requested,the Board will be name and address which will and anyone wfth your written consent. able to process your organizatfon's remain public. � application. ��Qt FO�'f'1'lG; ��._..�.�_.�:i Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, May 9, 2011. Chair Waldhauser called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Cera, Kisch, Kluchka, Schmidgall, Segelbaum and Waldhauser. Also present was Director of Planning and Development Mark Grimes, City Planner Joe Hogeboom, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioner McCarty was absent. 1. Approval of Minutes March 28, 2011 Regular Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Cera, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to approve the March 28, 2011 minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Amendment—Adding High Density Senior and Physical Disabilifiy Housing as a Conditional Use in the Medium Density (R-3) Residential Zoning District Section of City Code —ZO00-86 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To allow higher density senior and physical disability housing with a Conditional Use Permit in the Medium Density (R-3) Residential zoning district Hogeboom explained that as a result of the Comprehensive Plan update in 2008 there are several areas in the City designated for High Density Residential. There are two areas in particular that would have to be rezoned to High Density Residential (R-4) which might not be appropriate for the levels of traffic associated with a high density use. He stated the consensus of the City Council is that senior housing may be a good option for these areas because there is typically less traffic and it is not at peak hours. As a result, staff is recommending that the Zoning Code be amended to add High Density Senior and Physical Disability Housing as a conditional use in the Medium Density (R-3) zoning district so that these areas could be rezoned to R-3 instead of R-4. Grimes added that this proposed change allows the City to require a traffic study as part of the Conditional Use process which is another reason staff feels comfortable with this recommendation. Kisch asked if there were additional constraints considered beyond height limitations in the R-3 zoning district. Hogeboom said there aren't any additional tests that developments have to meet beyond the tests already required when considering a Conditional Use Permit application. Grimes stated that a development would still be subject to setback requirements, impervious surFace requirements, parking requirements, and other R-3 zoning district requests when applying for a Conditional Use Permit. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 Page 2 Larry Kueny, 7303 Ridgeway Road, said there is talk of a developer wanting to build senior housing at the corner of Harold and Winnetka. He said his main concern is if the developer owns the properties in question and if the property owners have been contacted by the City regarding the rezoning of their properties. He said he is also concerned about the area being "pigeon holed" for senior housing and he does not understand the process. Hogeboom explained that there is a developer who has an option to purchase six of the approximately 18 properties in the Harold and Winnetka area, but they have not submitted an application for development at this point. He explained that there will be a public meeting/open house for residents on June 23 and notifications will be mailed in advance of that meeting. The meeting will present road improvements for Harold Avenue and the impact of higher density housing on the proposed and existing street system. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public hearing. Waldhauser asked if the City could deny a request or place further restrictions such as height limitations on developments if they are required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit. Grimes stated that conditions could be added as part of the Conditional Use Permit application process. However, there would need to be good reasons and findings in order to deny an application. Waldhauser said the proposal seems to be a good solution to providing more housing options and will give the City more latitude and control when considering Conditional Use Permit applications. Segelbaum noted that the definitions for Senior Housing and Physical Disability Housing should be capitalized when they are used in the Zoning Code. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of amending the City Code to allow High Density Senior and Physical Disability Housing with a Conditional Use Permit in Section 11.23, Medium Density (R-3) Residential zoning district based on the following findings: • Senior and Physical Disability housing creates lower levels of traffic than does intergenerational housing. • Traffic generated from Senior and Physical Disability housing residents and employees typically occurs during off-peak times. • Dwelling units in Senior and Physical Disability housing can be smaller, on average, than dwelling units in intergenerational housing. (As would be the case in memory care and assisted living communities.) • Senior, Physical Disability, and lifecycle housing is identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a needed housing product type in the City of Golden Valley. • Allowing higher density Senior and Physical Disability housing to be built in the Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) would provide more opportunities to increase the housing type in the City. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 Page 3 3. Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map Amendment— 9110 Golden Valley Road — CPAM-45 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Address: 9110 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Light Industrial to Medium High Density Residential Hogeboom referred to the General Land Use Plan Map and explained that there are four separate areas that need to be redesignated due to the Comprehensive Plan update done in 2008. He explained that the City Council has reviewed these four areas and has determined that they do not wish to rezone the properties at this time. Therefore, the Land Use Plan Map has to be changed back to how it was before the 2008 Plan update so that the Zoning Map and Land Use Plan Map are consistent. He referred to the first area in question which is 9110 Golden Valley Road and stated that it is being recommended that the land use designation be changed from Light Industrial to Medium High Density Residential. Cera asked what would happen if the property were changed to an office use. Hogeboom stated that the Zoning Map and Land Use Plan Map would have to be amended at that time. Kisch asked if changing the land use designation back to what it was before the Comprehensive Plan update would be going against what was already decided by the public process. Kluchka expressed concern about "spot zoning." He asked about the possibility of allowing apartments as a conditional use in the Light Industrial zoning district. Grimes explained that the apartments on this property provide a number of affordable units and the City Council has stated they'd like to maintain it. Segelbaum asked about the impact to the property if it were to become a non-conforming use. Hogeboom stated that the property could continue to be used as a multi-family property. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public hearing. Kluchka said he is not in support of the recommended action to redesignate the property to Medium-High Density because it appears to be "spot zoning", the apartment buildings are allowed to remain, and there is the clear ability to improve the property. He added that his preference would be to have something non-residential on this property. Cera said he feels conflicted because if the designation is changed, the apartment buildings could be removed which he doesn't want. If the designation is not changed, an Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 Page 4 applicant would have to come before the City to ask for the property to be redesignated and rezoned if they wanted to redevelop this property for a different type of use. Kisch said keeping the property as it is would be a disservice and ultimately the market will dictate what will develop on this property. Waldhauser added that the process to amend the Zoning Map and the General Land Use Plan Map is lengthy and she speculates that re-designating the property now is an easier way to allow senior housing. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend denial of changing the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Light Industrial to Medium High Density Residential for the property at 9110 Golden Valley Road based on the following findings: • Having one residential parcel in the middle of a business/industrial area could be considered "spot zoning." • If land use remains "light industrial", existing apartment complexes can remain in place as legal non-conforming uses, and can be improved or replaced as needed. • Reverting the land use designation to residential would go against the planning process that was involved in the Comprehensive Plan revision of 2008. 4. Informal Public Hearing —General Land Use Plan Map Amendment— 2040 Douglas Drive —CPAM-46 � Applicant: City of Golden Valley Address: 2040 Douglas Drive Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Medium-Low Density Residential to Office Hogeboom referred to a map of the property located at 2040 Douglas Drive. He stated that the recommendation is to redesignate the property from Medium-Low Density Residential to Office so that the property will not become a non-conforming use when the property is zoned Residential. Kisch asked if this properiy was designated Medium-Low Density Residential before or after the Douglas Drive Corridor Study. Hogeboom said the property was designated Medium-Low Density before the Study. Kisch noted that the Study calls for this area to be mixed use. Grimes stated that the City may have to look at the zoning in the Douglas Drive Corridor in the future as land uses change. Waldhauser stated that the current designation for this property is Medium-Low Density Residential which is what is intended for the areas surrounding this property according to the Iong-term future uses identified in Douglas Drive Corridor Study. She added that she has the same concerns with this property as the area previously discussed. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 Page 5 Kluchka said he is not in favor of this recommendation because the original direction for this property was identified through the Comprehensive Plan public process and the Douglas Drive Corridor Study directed the area for mixed use. He said he is not sure he wants to consider the Douglas Drive Corridor Study over the Comprehensive Plan but the request for office use is neither mixed use or residential. Hogeboom explained that the Douglas Drive Corridor Study is part of the Comprehensive Plan but is not reflected on the General Land Use Plan Map. Kisch stated that maintaining the property as an office use seems to fit with the vision of mixed use as stated in the Douglas Drive Corridor, so while it seems to be spot zoning he would support an office use for this property because it fits with the larger vision. Segelbaum agreed and said he thinks office is an appropriate use at this property. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried 5 to 1 to recommend denial of changing the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Medium Low Density Residential to Office for the property at 2040 Douglas Drive based on the following findings. Commissioner Segelbaum opposed. • Having one office parcel in the middle of a residential area could be considered "spot zoning." • If land use remains "medium-low density residential", existing office building can remain in place as a legal non-conforming use, and can be improved or replaced as needed. • Reverting the land use designation to Office would go against the planning process that was involved in the Comprehensive Plan revision of 2008. • The Douglas Drive Corridor Study identified this area as primarily residential in character. 5. Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map Amendment— 1100, 1170, 1200 & 1300 Douglas Drive and 6200 & 6212 Golden Valley Road — CPAM-47 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Address: 1100, 1170, 1200 & 1300 Douglas Drive and 6200 & 6212 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from High Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential Hogeboom referred to the properties on a location map. He stated that this property is currently designated for High Density Residential and is being proposed for re- designation to Medium-High Density. He explained that the City Council has stated they feel this site would be suitable for high density senior housing, but may not be suitable high density non-senior housing because of the traffic impacts associated with High Density residential uses. If high density senior housing is allowed with a Conditional Use Permit, as previously discussed, then this site would still be able to accommodate high density senior-oriented housing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 Page 6 Cera referred to the single family properties in this area and asked if they would become non-conforming if they are re-designated to Medium-High Density Residential. Hogeboom said they would become non-conforming. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public hearing. Kluchka asked how this area was identified in the Douglas Drive Corridor Study. Kisch noted that the Study calls for residential in this area but doesn't specify the density. Kisch stated that he believes designating the property Medium-High Density would mitigate the traffic issues in this area and he also believes in this case re-designating the property to Medium-High Density would not constitute "spot zoning" because it fits well with the current General Land Use Plan Map and the adjacent land uses. Kluchka agreed that re-designating the properties to Medium-High Density meets the original intent of the research done for the Comprehensive Plan Update. It also fits with the Commission's recommendation to modify the R-3 Zoning District to allow Senior and Physical Disability Housing as a Conditional Use. Schmidgall said he is also in favor of this recommendation and he hopes to avoid another Applewood Point type of project at this location. MOVED by Kisch, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of changing the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from High Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential for the properties located at 1100, 1170, 1200 & 1300 Douglas Drive and 6200 & 6212 Golden Valley Road based on the following findings: • High density senior housing may be appropriate for this location. • High density non-senior housing may have traffic levels that cannot be sustained at this location. • The City Council has identified this area as an appropriate location for long-term medium-high density residential use. 6. Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map Amendment— 5635 & 5701 Glenwood Avenue— CPAM-48 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Address: 5635 and 5701 Glenwood Avenue Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Medium-High Density Residential to Low Density Residential Hogeboom referred to a map of the properties located at 5635 and 5701 Glenwood Avenue. Fie stated there are currently two single family homes located on these properties. He explained that there are multiple family dwellings nearby so it was originally thought these properties should also be designated for a higher density use. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 Page 7 Upon further review it was realized that these properties are not large enough to support a multi-family development so the recommendation is to re-designate the properties to Low Density Residential to reflect what is currently there. Kisch asked about the limitations of expanding the homes on these properties if the designation is changed to Medium-High Density. Hogeboom said the homes could be expanded if they meet the requirements of the Zoning Code. Kisch asked if a condition could be placed on these properties stating that no expansion would be allowed. Hogeboom stated that conditions cannot be placed rezoning applications. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment Waldhauser closed the public hearing. , Segelbaum said he is in favor of keeping the density low in this area. Cera said he thinks keeping the properties designated Medium-High Density Residential is in keeping with the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and it would allow the existing properties to remain. Kisch said he doesn't want the properties to become non- conforming. Grimes explained that if a developer wanted to develop these properties they would have to come before the City Council and ask for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Rezoning. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Cera and motion carried 5 to 1 to recommend approval of changing the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Medium- High Density Residential to Low Density Residential based on the following findings. Commissioner Kluchka opposed. • Rezoning this area to Medium-High Density (R-3) Residential would render the homes as non-conforming uses. • The City Council has identified this area as an appropriate location for long-term low density residential use. --Short Recess-- � 7. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authorifiy, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Grimes reported that the adult day care on Boone Avenue will be coming to a future Planning Commission meeting to amend their Conditional Use Permit to allow for more clients. Segelbaum handed out the recently passed state statute regarding the new variance language and discussed the new language regarding practical difficulties. Hogeboom stated that the Council will be discussing the consolidation of the Board of Zoning Appeals with the Planning Commission at the May 10 Council/Manager meeting. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 Page 8 8. Other Business Waldhauser stated that the Commission needs to nominate a new Secretary since Les Eck chose not to be reappointed when his term ended. MOVED by Schmidgall to nominate Cera to be Secretary, Segelbaum seconded the nomination and the motion carried unanimously. 9. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 pm. David Cera, Secretary Golden Valley Human Services Foundation (GVHSF) Meeting Minutes May 9, 2011 Present: Dan Blumb, Hilmer Erickson, Brenda Hayle, Elissa Heilicher, Chris Monroe , Diane Nimmer, Connie Sandler and Toots Vodovoz. Also present: Mayor Linda Loomis, Dean Penk, Golden Valley Community Foundation, and Jeanne Fackler, Staff Liaison. Call to Order: Chairman Blumb called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. March 14 minutes: Heilicher moved and Monroe seconded the motion to approve the minutes of March 14. The motion passed unanimously. Communifiy Foundation Update: Blumb welcomed Mayor Loomis and Dean Penk. Penk gave an overview of the GV Community Foundation (GVCF). The GVCF will be the umbrella foundation and will contact businesses within Golden Valley for contributions. The GVHSF will continue to raise money for human service needs through Run the Valley, the Golf Classic and Taste of Golden Valley. The GVHSF inay also apply for funding through the GVCF. The GVCF will send the solicitation letter to all residents on behalf of the GVCF, the GV Community Events Fund (Valley Days) and the GVHSF with the option for residents of giving to any or all of these groups. GVHSF will have one seat on the Board of Directors. GVHSF Name: Members discussed changing the name of the GVHSF. Suggestions should be sent to Fackler. Discussion will be at the June meeting. Election of ChairNice-Chair: Heilicher nominated Sandler as Chair and Blumb as Co- Chair, Nimmer seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Evaluation of Run the Valley: Members evaluated the event. The event was successful raising $19,707. There was plenty of food, water and volunteers. Suggestions for 2012 include: Greeters at the door to answer questions Helpers at the registration tables Person to guard the food area Runners needed for t-shirts and tabulating table Registration people need to clarify race and number at registration. If the runner is changing races they need to receive a new number Race date was discussed. The first weekend of April is Passover and Easter. Heilicher will contact religious community members and report to Fackler. Date will be set by June 1St. Calendar Review: Golf Classic-Friday, July 15th: Sponsor letters are going out this week. Brochures and posters are being updated. Fackler will contact Davanni's for prices. Taste of Golden Valley: The Commission discussed the event and want the event to continue. Sandler will contact The Metropolitan, Blumb will contact GV Country Club for for fee and possible dates. Ideas discussed: Raising the ticket price to $25 Contacting the VFW or Legion to sponsor a raffle portion of the evening Give tickets away at city events i.e. Neighborhood Watch meetings Contact restaurants who have participated previously in May Other Business: GV 125th Anniversary: Vodovoz is the GVHSF representative. It was decided that the Golf Tournament would not meet the criteria set by the 125t" Committee. Fackler will contact Tom Cook to see if he has an antique golf display for the luncheon. Solicitation letter. The GV Community Foundation will mail the solicitation letter. Adjournment: Sandler moved to adjourn the meeting, Erickson seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. RespectFully submitted, Jeanne Fackler, GVHSF Staff Liaison �7� _ ,y �ii'h i�� .. k. .:. . � ��.,'. . ..:: t �. w d'in Nti �J � 0 :, �� e Public Works - 763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 3. E. Authorize Cooperative Agreement with the Metropolitan Council Environmental S�rvices (MCES) and Professional Services Agreement with Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) for the MCES GV-461 Reliever Project Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Jeff Oliver, P.E., City Engineer Mitchell Hoeft, EIT, Engineer Summary The proposed alignment of the MCES GV-461 reliever line includes installation of an 18-inch sanitary sewer forcemain along the Circle Down corridor. The 2012 Pavement Management Program (PMP) also includes reconstruction of the street surface and utilities along this corridor. In order to minimize the disturbances to our residents as well as decrease overall project costs to the City, staff would like to enter into a cooperative agreement with the MCES to combine these projects. Under this agreement, SEH will be asked to design the placement of the sanitary sewer reliever along with its current design of the 2012 PMP. Future amendments to this agreement may also allow for the City general contractor to install the sanitary sewer forcemain for the MCES in conjunction with their own PMP work on Circle Down. The City would require compensation for the installation and restoration. A professional services agreement also needs to be authorized with SEH to include the design of the GV-461 reliever line with the 2012 PMP project. Authorization of this agreement will also allow SEH to begin design on this project. The not to exceed cost included in the SEH proposal is $39,529.00. The professional services agreement with SEH will become Exhibit C of the cooperative agreement with the MCES. The MCES has agreed to reimburse the City of Golden Valley up to an estimated $10,000 for its administrative and management costs for the design of the MCES forcemain, as outlined in the June 15, 2011 memorandum from Jeff Schwartz, MCES Project Manager. Please review the attached agreements. Staff will present all amendments to this agreement as they are developed with you at a future Council meeting. Attachments Professional Services Agreement with SEH dated June 8, 2011 (4 pages) MCES Cooperation Agreement (18 pages) Memorandum from Jeff Schwartz, MCES Project Manager dated June 15, 2011 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to authorize entering into a Cooperative Agreement with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and Professional Services Agreement with Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. for the MCES GV-461 Reliever Project. . "�,�� -- ;�'.. �. �� r� � o �ot� �� I��_ --_ 1_ -`-_=-,_-_� June 8,2011 RE: Golden Va11ey 1-GV-461 Relief Station and Force main City Project on Circle Down SEH No.GOLDV 110544 Jeannine Clancy Director of Public Works City of Golden Valley 3400 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley,MN 55427 Dear Jeannine: Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City of Golden Valley and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES)to provide professional design services to the City of Golden Valley for the Circle Down segment of their larger 1-GV-461 Lift Station and Force ma.in project. This letter serves as the Supplemental Letter Agreement in accordance with the Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Golden Valley and SEH. Background The City of Golden Valley has completed the design and intends to reconsixuct Circle Down as part of their 2012 Pavement Management Program. The Metropolitan Council, as part of its metropolitan wastewater treatment facilities,proposes to design and construct a lift station and 18 inch diameter force main through the City to improve their interceptor facilities in the Golden Valley and St. Louis Park service azeas. Part of the proposed force main route is located on Circle Down.Metropolitan Council is entering into an agreement with the City to have SEH revise their current street reconstruction plan to incorporate construction of the force ma.in. Scope of Work Data Gathering Suswey SEH will obtain additional field surveys for the areas outside of the current project area, genera.11y at the connection near TH 100 on the east end, and then approauma.tely 200 feet on the west end near Turner's Crossroad from the Circle Down intersection going north and west. The proposed survey work will include obtaining vertical and horizontal control, available property corner and monument control, and the gathering of topographic,profile and x-section information. Geotechnical SEH will review the e�risting subsurface information and coordinate the location and number of additional soil borings with Metropolitan Council. SEH's geotechnical engineers will be providing the geotechnical boring coordination, evaluation and technical assistance with the project.They will coordinate the boring locations and material testing program and pipe bedding recommendations. SEH will review the subsurface materials and borings, identify potential problems, develop an additional boring program {if necessary) and . make recommenda.tions based upon the information that is available. The recommendations will be summarized in a memo for your information and project file. Soil borings and La.b Testing services will be performed by a separate contractor through Metropolitan Council. Short Elliotk liendricksoee Inc.,3535 Vadnais Center Drive,St Paul,MN 55110-5196 SEH is an equal opporcunity employer � www.sehinc.com � 651.490.2000 � 800.325.2055 � 651.490.2150 fax Jeannine Clancy June 8,2011 Page 2 Existing UndeYground Utilities SEH will review record plan information supplied by the City and will send the additional project location information to Gopher One for a design locate. Meetings We e�cpect to attend two design meetings with City and Metro Council staff through the course of the design work for the Circle Down force main segment. The first meeting would be held at the conclusion of the preliminary design. The purpose of this meeting will be to decide on the approach for installation method of the force main and review the participating cost methodology, check in on the scope and schedule, receive direction and assign tasks. The second meeting is proposed to be held when the final design is 90 or 95 % complete. The purpose of this meeting will be to review the plans, discuss the construction agreement, make revisions, and discuss the bidding and award schedule and construction services. Preliminary Design Phase SEH will layout the preliminary alignment for the force ma.in in Circle Down,proposing beginning and ending connection points for the next pha.se of the work. The majority of the preliminary design effort will be evaluating open cut or directional drilling options for the pipe installation.Risks and costs will be reviewed and then discuss with City and Met Council staff. The estimate will be used as a basis for the methodology used for the cost participation agreement between the City and Met Council. �inal Design and Plan Preparation SEH will prepare force ma.in plans in the format required by the City of Golden Valley and include these plans with the completed plans created for the street and utility reconstruct project. SEH will work with the project partners to include design details and requirements in the plans and specifications that will satisfy both agencies. SEH will deliver design CAD files to MCES and plan to prepare record plans for the City of Golden Valley as part of construction services. Project Team Sue Mason and Dan Erickson will be the team that prepares the force main design and plans.Don Lutch will assist the team as the directional drilling expert and provide QA/QC review of the plans and specifications. Sue Mason will be the Project Manager; Dan Erickson is assigned to the project as the Project Engineer, providing preliminary and final design details and technical production work Ron Farmer will provide the geotechnical analysis and evaluation. Schedule We expect to begin working on the preliminary survey as soon as the contract is signed. The subsurface soils investigation field work will begin immediately as well.The preliminary design phase is expected to be completed in July with final plans and specifications following in September/October in order for the construction agreement to be ready for an early December Council meeting. Compensation SEH proposes to be compensated for the scope of work proposed in this Agreement on an hourly basis. Compensation will be based on the hotuly cost of personnel plus reimbursable expenses,including reproductions,mileage and equipment.We have estima.ted the services described above to cost a total of $39,529.This estimate is not a fixed fee or a not to exceed fee.The City of Golden Valley will be Jeannine Clancy June 8,2011 Page 3 invoiced for actual labor and reimbursable expenses incurred by SEH to complete the work.The person/hour task budgets for each phase of the work are attached. This agreement is an understanding of the project to date. If this document satisfactorily sets forth you understanding of our agreement,please sign in the space below and return one copy to our office. We look forward to working with you, your staff and the community on this project. Thanks for the opportunity to continue to work with the City of Golden Valley. Respectively submitted, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. � vv�� Sus M.Mason,P.E. ' cipal Approved this day of ,2011 City of Golden Valley,Minnesota By � C: Don Lutch,Alva Rankin s:�t'jlglgoldvlcommon�2011 pmpVetteragteeme¢t2011adoc Metropolitan Council 111031 IYICf+.S 1-G't�-461 Relief Statlon and T+'orce Main Hle:s:1Fnc+cowvtcommontpropomrstt.�ctearlvefmce,mtnl�scFS tvoricrosks.xts City of Goldeu VAlley • S�T3 No. 110544 -CiYlbl RcIIeJSlaiion aad NaceAfaln(June Z021) rabl�: Il"xI7"Plane and SpeeUteniions[er City and ikICES rerie�v nar1 construcpmr plans for blddtng. Baglneer's esUmal� lask Pro}tctblacsger �� PL' ��, LtadTeth Admtn Sur4tpCrew 1 Dala GaWering �A Pre11ml 5un�e 2 Hmizmmai CoWrol ' 3 Perform lkld sarre - va1,horiz,x socUon 12 Tsansfer andrtdace 8eld dala I CanerlAioaYSearch 3 ltiavd 3 ]B Ceofeeh�aIServt� 22avlsa+e�dstin sub-sudaceiafomaUon 2 2 Hada coadinaUonepdmvlaw 1 • Sv6sudaca r�cwmiwudattoas end menq 1 4 IC C1nd rouad U81111es 1 call 2 Recwd dra� revJa�v and basertn ta 2 z at�uo�s a� �eao n z s z rs�� e 9s�s>�i»,�un�1 a s 2 3 Pr Dcsl 4 1 call 2 4 2 Recmd dmtivIn review�xl basoma te 4 8 forccmain ' nt 2 4 8 au ns.d'uectia�al drlll�vaulaflm cost asitaato 8 16 16 4 Rinal Aestga and Plan Prn nratton Addmss MCRS Commmts Z 8 16 AL m lau 2 8 Detat7 s6cet 1 sheet) 2 B UdUt sLeetrev3alms imks2ffi�vabeets) 4 20 ' ahextievlsiom(inciudes 1 new aLea 4 12 Re- construc8oa lan 8 Pinal cost esUomta 2 8 8 S ' 'ons 2 12 Dea coardinatton S 4 CAD 61es�n riCL3 4 Tdalhoms Z86 20 8 44 12 12 22 NroJerl labor cost tkis pkase $35,106 Bqutpment charges Dfileage SSD Compulets 9L1 ltepioductions Z,OOD Smcey Yart a�Bq+ilpmmt 9�9 �'Wal oroJec�cns►rhlstask S39.S29 Uniuue rnmuonents or assumutMns: CiiY pays fm hiU:id�Yrtisiqg. Estimated City Administrative Costs: $10, 000. 00 Total Estimated Metropolitan Council Costs : $49,529.00 W(d'tH I Pagt f Of 7 RI 1546} Met Council#11I031 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Design Services for 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain Project THIS COOPERATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of day of , 2011, by and between the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and the Metropolitan Council, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota("Council"). WITNESSETH: RECITALS 1. The City has authorized and intends to start removal and replacement of a street named Circle Down as part of their Pavement Management Program on or about April 1, 2012. Construction will include full width pavement removal and replacement of approximately 1750 lineal feet of street, stormwater drainage improvements, and landscaping. For the purposes of this Agreement, this project is called the "City Project". The location of the City Project is shown in Exhibit A of this Agreement. 2. The Council, as part of its metropolitan wastewater treatment facilities, proposes to design and construct a lift station and 18-inch diameter forcemain through the City to increase capacity and improve redundancy and reliability of its interceptor facilities in the City and St. Louis Park service areas. Construction will include installation of a 5 million gallon per day (MGD) capacity lift station in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Interstate I-394 and Hwy 100 and 18-inch diameter forcemain from the lift sta.tion to the Council owned Plymouth Forcemains north of Hwy 55. Part of the proposed forcemain route is Circle Down as shown in 1of14 Exhibit A. For the purposes of this Agreement the Circle Down segment of the 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain Project is called the"Council Project". 3. The Council has determined that it can best utilize its staff and financial resources by providing for the design of the Council Project by the City. 4. The Council is authorized by Minnesota Statutes § 473.504 to construct any interceptor or treatment works determined to be necessary or convenient for the collection and disposal of sewage in the metropolitan area and, under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 471.59 (providing for joint or cooperative action between governmental units including the Council and City), contract with any governmental unit for the performance on the Council's behalf of any service the governmental unit is authorized to provide for itself. 5. The 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain Project is duly authorized by the Council and is included in Council's 2012 Capital Improvement Plan. 6. The Council and the City agree that each is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, Metropolitan Council Action No. 2011-134 and City Council Resolution dated , and that the Council Project may be carried out by the parties hereto as provided by this Agreement under the provisions of Minnesota Sta.tutes § 471.59. 7. This Cooperative Agreement is for design services only and shall not be construed to permit construction in the City's right of way without a City right of way permit. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2of14 AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which has been agreed to by the parties,the Council and the City agree as follows: I. PURPOSE . The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions under which the City will combine the design of the Council Project and the City Project. The Council will reimburse the City for all costs associated with the design of the Council Project,including City staff costs for project coordination and management. The Council Project Scope of Work and Council Estimate of Costs are included as Exhibits B and C of this Agreement,respectively. II. CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT 1. In accordance with the terms of this agreement the Council hereby consents to and appoints the City as its agent to design the Council Project and incorporate the Council Project into the City Project. 2. The City has contracted Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. ("Consultant") to provide engineering services for the City Project. The City shall obtain a proposal including range of work and a fee for engineering services from the Consultant to provide engineering services for the Council Project including design and production of Construction Documents in accordance with the terms of this agreement. Construction Documents will include plans, specifications, bidding documents, and a proposed schedule. If the Consultant's proposal is not acceptable to the Council, the Council sha11 have the right to terminate or amend this Agreement in accordance with the terms of this agreement. 3of14 III. COUNCIL PROJECT DESIGN PHASE 1. E�ibit B contains the Scope of Work for the Council Project. Upon full execution of this Agreement, the City will engage the Consultant to prepare Construction Documents for the Council Project based on the Scope of Work. 2. � The City shall provide the Council notice of and the Council shall participate in progress meetings with the Consultant to confirm that the Consultant is proceeding in accordance with the Council's Scope of Work and the Council's requirements. 3. The City shall require the Consultant to prepare and submit Council Project Construction Documents to Council for review. The Council shall perform review and approval in accorda.nce with the Consultant's proposed schedule. 4. The Council sha11 have the right to require modifications to the Council Project Scope of Work and Contract Documents by written notice to the City identifying the required modifications. If the Council requests a modification that is an additional service under the Consultant's contract with the City, the City shall submit the required modification to the Consultant and solicit a proposal from the Consultant identifying the cost and schedule impact associated with performing the additional service. The City shall not order the Consultant to proceed with modifications until the Council has agreed in writing to the Consultant's proposal and until the City determines that the modification will not adversely impact the City Project, including the City Project schedule. The cost of modifications required and approved by the Council shall be the responsibility of the Council unless otherwise agreed in writing by the City and the Council. 4of14 5. The Council agrees that acceptance of the Council Project Construction Documents by the Council for bid shall be deemed to be a representation by the Council that the Council has reviewed the Council Project Construction Documents and found them complete. 6. The Council and City each have the right to terminate this Agreement by written notice to each other. IV.COSTS AND PAYMENT 1. The Estimated Council Project Design Cost is shown in E�chibit C. 2. When the Council has accepted the City's recommended Consultant professional engineering services fee for the Council Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the City and Council agree to substitute, without the requirement of a formal amendment to this Agreement as long as Estimated Council Project Design Cost is not exceeded, a new Exhibit C showing the actual professional engineering fee and City contract administration fees for the Council Project. 3. The Council will reimburse the City in the amounts provided in this Agreement monthly, within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoices submitted by the City based on the progress of the Council Project and approval of the invoices by the Council unless the Council contests the invoice by written notice within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the invoice. If the Council provides timely notice of contest, the Council shall pay all uncontested amounts and may withhold the contested amount pending resolution of the amount actually due. 4. At the completion of the Design Phase of the Council Project, the City shall submit to the Council the City's Final Cost Statement for the Council Project, invoices showing the Council's final costs, evidence of payments by the City to the Consultant as of the date of the Final Cost Statement, and statements of amounts payable to the Consultant as of that date. The Sof14 Council shall have thirty (30) calendar days from the receipt of said invoices to review and pay or contest the amount due. The amount due shall be final, binding and conclusive, and the amount shall be immediately payable, upon expiration of the aforesaid thirty (30) calendar day examination period unless the Council has contested the amount pursuant to this paragraph. If the Council provides timely notice of contest of the final invoices, the Council shall pay all uncontested amounts and may withhold the contested amount pending resolution of the amount actually due. 5. The City shall administer all contracts associated with the Project in such a way as to keep separate the costs of the Council Project from the City Project. 6. The City shall not submit any invoice to the Council for Payment until the City has determined, in the City's reasonable discretion, that the invoice is due and payable for the Council Project. V. RIGHTS OF ENTRY AND PERNIITS For purposes of design of the Council Project, the City (including its employees, consultants and contractors) may enter upon the property or property interests owned by the Council. For the purposes of design of the Council Project, the Council (including its employees, Council's consultants and contractors) may enter upon the properly or property interests owned by the City. 6of14 VI. RECORDS AND DATA 1. All records kept by the Council and the City with respect to the Council Project shall be subject to examination by the representative of each party hereto. 2. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose by the activities of the City and the Council pursuant to this Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as amended, and the Minnesota Rules implementing such Act now in force or hereinafter adopted. VII. EMPLOYEES 1. All employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the Council, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged, on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, sha11 in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the Council. 2. All employees of the Council and a11 other persons engaged by the Council in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the Council shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State o�Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made �ofia by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged, on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. VIII. RESPONSIBILITY AND INDEMNITY 1. Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by the law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The Council's maximum monetary liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Sta.tutes Chapter 466. The City's maximum monetary liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. 2. The Council warrants that it is able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through a self insurance program and have minimum coverage consistent with the liability limits contained in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466; the City warrants that it is able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through its insurance program and have minimum coverage consistent with the liability limits contained in Minnesota Sta.tutes Chapter 466. , 3. The City further agrees that any contract let by the City for the performance of the Council Project as provided herein shall include clauses that will require the contractor to: a) defend, indemnify, and save harmless the City and Council, its officers, agents and employees from claims, suits, dexnands, damages,judgments, costs, interest, expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attomey fees, witness fees, and disbursements incurred in defense thereof arising out of or by reason of the negligence of said contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors; 8of14 b) provide and maintain insurance as required in the contract between the City and the contractor and to provide the Council, also as required in the contract between the City and the contractor, with Certificates of Insurance naming the Council and the City as additional insured; c) being an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the work provided for in this Agreement. IX. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 1. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between parties is conta.ined herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement including the Recitals are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. 2. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. X. INCORPORATION OF APPLICABLE LAW Applicable provisions of Minnesota. State law, federal law and of any applicable local ordinances shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. Specifically, City and Council agree to comply with all federal, state and local laws and ordinances applicable to each of them, respectively, relating to nondiscrimination, affirmative action, public purchases, contracting employment, including workers' compensation and surety deposits required for construction contracts. 9of14 XI. SEVERABILITY The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. If any part of this Agreement is rendered void, invalid or unenforceable, such rendering shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement unless the part or parts which are void, invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire Agreement with respect to the parties. One or more waivers by said party of any provision term, condition or covenant shall not be construed by the other parties as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same by other parties. XII. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS The covenants of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto,their successors and assigns. XIII. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement is entered into in and under the laws of the Sta.te of Minnesota and sha11 be interpreted in accordance therewith. XIV. NOTICES Any notice of demand, which may or must be given or made by a party hereto, under the terms of this Agreement or any sta.tute or ordinance, shall be in writing and shall be sent certified mail or delivered in person to the other party addressed as follows: 10 of 14 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT SERVICES William Moore, General Manager 390 Robert St.N. St. Paul,MN 55101 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Jeannine Clancy, Public Works Director 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley,MN 55427 XV.TERMINATION The Council can terminate this Agreement with or without cause at any time with 30 days notice. If the Council terminates this Agreement,the Council shall reimburse the City for all costs expended for the Council Project to the date of termination. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY By By Its Mavor Its City Mana�er METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By Its Re�ional Administrator 11 of 14 � - , �� t � , � ��, .y�,��.�.� � � �. ; .��. � ua a � •ls_'�.'R s s+n� � � � ��I t ' . `� r� +��r'�....-.yt�_r� i� :� 11� I� � . 4 '4 -�. 0. �� hi � �P� �,` " .� ��'' �'r -�� ;�� e ' . , , r+► .� � ' �fiti..:� ' '.; '� !4� i ' . . yE,.;+�.. � `:..L ..: . _ . 4. '� � . � e'�„�•.p, . i �` � , . , �.. . ,... . "�- .�-_�1 ---4-�.,, .,i i'�A�` ,'�.t,, ' � __ — . ' .....- - �� : -- �- y-� � :� " ��' * � ... . p . � iT� , :, . . ., � #. � L �• ..� _ . . �� . . . . . �� ,.� �. ' / ��d , . � ; .� `� . �K .�rt +�M � - � ,°. t�. �: � '�+..� . '.�' i ' I V,K� � g �•�, �" ^N ,�}7 •' , � ��. ��J�� ' } �� +i y�� •r'�� ` � " �l.�C, ,rst�. ' .r ;� ,��b��i+r�'�'M � 1�w - :�- '✓'']J!�',''';� �� ,�j(�I '�►'�� ;i�jy"•. _rr�,'� ;�Xy�t•�, �r '�� ..��,, l, � 't Y ' "i` '�. -- ��,�t��,3��,� r "'Ph i.. al'�j�. ��;' '�,� � ,�,�� 1 � ��.�A�'!-- .�-..r�. �z t�'r�, .��w�� ' � y,��,J,,��. ,�, A� �F �'r A "�jy ��„,'��,`�'�n'.t +� ` r _ Y = � � ' �♦ �� ,��,�.!�,,�.t ,�. ��!' �:4 �`i.��,f •' � �I- - , �ai�o�i.� .;� ,«. :` a. +A4�� ' !�; .,; � ��,.•A.! - �a"'�p!�*'_ �, ; ''' �!:�'�,' :,�-,� �,"• �% '• ;r �� 3f � � _ , ; . !+-� ! �� . t�;,. �'�„ ��d0 �a '� - r�;�r.�h „ '•r, , ' ` i�� ~� '� ' -. �,�� `, �►p :i { ` # !t• +";+�.� `�aa @ �I� .r-r. ' ' '� �,, �,.. a �'''��A�, !'� �� y� •# .- �� ,..w '� � � '� �* .+ l�j�. e�""f'� �p/ '�„� , � i ��, , :�. � t - '►w ' :'� 4 I f � � �O�c r J-L i � � ^� . { �� .. �-n.�►r . ' '' .) �►! � � '�` �• :C�r .1 ,��,,� � - :� `q�---r'� R -a #. a. _ s��"! - t,.�.�V � � t`r� � ' � ..S't`A�' � a 4 � '_f -�� Proposed ',`� � r ' � �► �. ,� ,.�.'/��: d` ±�N�.� �" a::�+ �- �. . ��- �•• .'F ". ' �! :� 18 Force Main ,,-,�;� . . � . , .�� ,� � ,,; ^�+� R,._* t.J „o .. r r�, • � ..d ►,� �-��' .,.a r�x} ..�,��. �t, ��:�•�� ,'` 1�".�.'• ,��.. �y, yI '},* ?� r. a*, �.�a+ �, � � ��q�� 4'+ f y 1 ��. � •� � �'�•l�'�"r. 6 �1�.��:.w-'� �� J�' - n ,• �� ,. - 1F ��•I��+1.- f�'.C ♦I � .� �� f ,�+-� ��,� �`t. - �r. _ ..r.,, �, "-'� [.� � -c � .� :� �r-- +� ,- ,. . : . � �� , �„ dr • ��!�L �•`� (i ,�� • ��• �" _� 1 ♦ . >� � � ;� . ;�.�w+ P�i �t� !'"""_ �, ' � i '�, L fi_.,. �� , '� _. '4.�_�N ' �� Circle Down Project `' .� ; �� y:1 � �t� _E , ti,r '� ,�, - , .. _ f� �_��'�p �" �}� �� i� � i. �_ ' .r ! ` '�'�l*�' : '`T . �� , � �'�# _ �` ; .�� .�'' .._• , .�k �' O � � ""�`�11 *t.'�� f r�, ,��'' � . � . � . t 11 �' �"�1! 4~ �w, , .f ,; `4 � ;�� t ¢� ,� �'� v .o� � ;�,� �� '� �� ' i1�� y� - �� ry t� ��.._.... .� :�Y� �' ' � ��,. '� '�y� �� . '�'. 1 -- _ r.� «�+ � �S�"� � �� iyy�,� �fe . . . .._ J ---. � _ _ - .v"'�-��t�. .i.-_�' b'+-- •-4�!,4, �w � ..- �.-�r _..._ _ — , , '\-" �.` �_r . �� - ' . � .... _ ..��__ '�r�_ � ... - - _` �4• ��-�,� �^.�.� .--.. �fy'„� J� - ��f.�s` p•`� �.. . :�'-'Ir1t �S' 1 s-� . � . (y (7 ,.�,p�� }y— .�� J� 1. . �I �.Z.,� �'�� r ,,�. �`"-} ', lS a,F,LY'�,,l'1!�.�1�:.I��"� r- •,:- � • ..ti'f,:.�,.. , . �,.;�.f,.. ...�►i° t � �, J�"�'e ,� .!�,,'�,�,, _ . ',,,;�- ;# - ' ��' , ' ��" '' ;. � � . �� I d � `' ��' s.� '♦ �.r ��R ��r�: �• _. ,�!�.� , � � rs `� .� � S�"�� ' • C �L *� � ' 1 � a � � �M''��w��d ��. . ♦.�f+,�i�. � i f • .., • � ,� . . .r'"�. ' ��. � i � ,� , �f'�i / -� �r '��T i , , '�� ,, '�� . ,a� ��'� ��'"'�.. �� ,js .� :� r� � � � 1 r, ��!�t n-�.!* . �' � - r ♦ �, r �w+• - •►_� j � !. ' J f �►a �t�syb, R r .. . � , , . � ' � � � y��i � 7 � y � . � . ��r ' � w �� .�� , � 4 � `�r� � _'• �i ; _.'�'�_-� _ _��,,. __ -___ __ k= r ' ' �, ,, f—,�--, i � ; . / W �' ��,: �." , ,�. � . .i '�.� �. �.•,�yq• •L� - . � � � .�� ' r �-` ;.r �,�� ?.�' . . � ` ."_ �.' ' �y '' �� i.- . � �' J''� �•. '�ly�d �1`�,'�`�'r �^ �• �'_.��= if� — � �k t. •M �4' '� .y�� '. �� ti st ti' '. � !� r- ' ' �� _ �� i}L _ _, ,�• -,` �� f � � FIGURE 1 Exhibit A o 500 �,000 � Proposed 18" Force Main Feet St Louis Park/Golden Valley Circle Down Projed /� 1-GV 461 Q Municipal Boundaries �y�� 1HRGSPN4SbatalCAD1825840J�GIS1GotlenVale acPlanlEANf�Fi ueslF'ure 2 Pro�ect Locatim Ci 7l109 12 t8mxd �Metropoli�tan Council Technical Services Me�noYahdum DATE: May 5,2011 TO: City of Golden Valley FROM: JefF Schwarz, MCES Project Manager SUBJECT: 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Force Main Project 805700 Circle Down Forcemain Requirements As requested during our April 29, 2011 meeting, MCES has prepared the following minimum requirements for forcemain pipe installation to be incorporated into the Circle Down design by the City's consultant. A detail showing PVC pipe bedding and trench backfill is attached. Ezcavation • If classified material as defined by MnDOT 2105.2 is encountered in the Pipe Bedding Zone, CONTRACTOR shall over-excavate as directed by the Engineer. Fill and Backfill • If classified soils were not encountered in the Pipe Bedding Zone, Place Bedding Material in 9- inch lifts to the limits shown on the detail and compact each lift to a minimum 95 percent Modified Proctor Density as determined by ASTM D1557. Use hand held rammer or vibratory plate compactors in the Pipe Bedding Zone. • If classified soils were encountered in the Pipe Bedding Zone and over excavation was directed by the Engineer, conduct the following Trench Stabilization activities: 1. Line the bottom of the over-excavated trench with Geotextile Fabric. 2. Backfill with 1%2" minus sorted, washed, crushed rock free of clay balls, debris, and organic materials meeting MnDOT 3149.2H gradation requirements to the upper limit of the Pipe Bedding Zone to provide proper pipe bedding and lateral trench support. 3. Compact crushed rock with excavator bucket. 4. Place Geotextile Fabric over crushed rock before placing Backfill Materials in the Trench Backfill Zone. 5. If groundwater is present, install trench dams. • Install tracer wire, #12 AWG type THWN, continuously along the centerline of the Forcemain a m�imum of two feet above the crown. � Install marking tape, green Allen Markline or equal, continuously over the centerline of the Forcemain a minimum of four feet above the crown. • Install and survey Passive Electronic Markers (PEMs), green 3M Scotchmark Electronic Ball Marker model 1403-XR or equal, 3 feet below grade at minimum 200-foot spacings along the pipe alignment and at crossings with other utilities, bends, and valves. Provide an electronic spreadsheet file containing unique numbered identifiers for each PEM and county system based survey coordinates. PVC FORCEMAIN PIPE • AWWA GC905,ASTM D1784. • Nominal Pipe Size: 18-inch. • Dimension Ratio: DR-18. • Mechanical Joint Restraint: EBAA Iron Series 2000 on every pipe bend. All bolts, tie rods and hardware sha11 be stainless steel. • Minimum 6 feet of cover over pipe crown. • Joint deflection: Less than 75%of the maximum allowable. • Provide thrust restraint at locations where unbalanced forces exist. • Deflection test by pulling a mandrell through the pipe by hand. • Pressure test pipe by plugging ends and applying 100 psi pressure for two hours. Test fails if leakage is observed or if pressure drop exceeds 5 percent of test pressure. �Metropolitau Cou�cil Technical Services Memorandum DATE: May 31, 2011 TO: City of Golden Valley FROM: Jeff Schwarz, MCES Project Manager SUBJECT: 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Force Main Project 805700 Circle Down Horizontal Directional Drilling for HDPE Pipe Requirements As requested during our May 27, 2011 meeting, MCES has prepared the following minimum requirements for horizontal directional drilling for HDPE pipe to be considered during evaluation of the forcemain installation method on Circle Down design by the City's consultant. ASTM Requirements � • F1962-OS Use of Maxi-Horizontal Directional Drilling for Placement of Polyethylene Pipe or Conduit Under Obstacles, Including River Crossings. • F714 Polyethylene(PE) Plastic Pipe(SDR-PR)Based on Outside Diameter. • D2657 Heat Joining Polyolefin Pipe and Fittings. Other • Nominal Pipe Size: 18-inch. • Minimum 6 feet of cover over pipe crown. • Deflection test by pulling a mandrell through the pipe by hand. • Pressure test pipe by plugging ends and applying 100 psi pressure for two hours. Test fails if leakage is observed or if pressure drop exceeds 5 percent of test pressure. • Plug each pipe end and survey with GPS prior to backfilling. • [nstall and survey Passive Electronic Markers (PEMs), green 3M Scotchmark Electronic Ball Marker model 1403-XR or equal, 3 feet below grade at minimum 200-foot spacings along the pipe alignment and at crossings with other utilities, bends, and valves. Provide an electronic spreadsheet file containing unique numbered identifiers for each PEM and county system based survey coordinates. Ezhibit C Estimated Council Project Costs 14 of 14 �Metropolitan Council Technical Services Memorandum DATE: June 15, 2011 TO: City of Golden Valley FROM: Jeff Schwarz, MCES Project Manager SUBJECT: 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Force Main Project 805700 CiTy Administrative Costs for Circle Down Forcemain Project MCES estimates that City of Golden Valley costs to administer the referenced project will be approximately $10,000. MCES will reimburse the City for actual costs incurred in accordance with ' Section IV - Costs and Payment of the proposed Cooperative Agreement for Design Services. �fy �� ; � Public Works oe ae 763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 3. F. 2011-2012 Pavement Management Program 1. Amend Feasibility Report 2. Amendment to Engineering Services with SEH, Inc. Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Summary The City of Golden Valley 2011-2012 Pavement Management Program (PMP) included Turners Crossroad between Interstate 394 (I-394) and Golden Hills Drive. However, the feasibility report for the project recommended removing the subject portion of Turners Crossroad from the projects due to the unknown nature of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) 1-GV-461 Reliever project. The MCES project is intended to extend an 18-inch diameter forcemain from the vicinity of TH 100 and I-394 northward to TH 55, with the anticipated route crossing I-394 at Turners Crossroad. The final route for the MCES reliever project will cross I-394 immediately adjacent to TH 100 and proceed toward Turners Crossroad along Circle Down. Therefore, staff is recommending that the portion of Turners Crossroad that was deleted from the 2012 PMP be placed back into the project. An amendment to the original feasibility report will be prepared and a public hearing will be required for the addition of Turners Crossroad to the already approved 2012 PMP. Staff has received a letter of proposal, dated June 6, 2011, from the consulting engineering firm of SEH, Inc, for the preparation of the feasibility report and final design of Turners Crossroad. This outlined scope of services will be perFormed at a not to exceed cost of $35,500. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Resolution Authorizing Amendment of the Feasibility Report for the 2011 and 2012 Pavement Management Program to Include Turners Crossroad Between Interstate 394 and Golden Hills Drive (1 page) Letter proposal to Jeannine Clancy from SEH, Inc., dated June 6, 2011 (3 pages) Recommended Action 1. Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing Amendment of the Feasibility Report for the 2011 and 2012 Pavement Management Program to Include Turners Crossroad Between Interstate 394 and Golden Hills Drive. 2. Motion to authorize a contract with SEH, Inc. to provide professional engineering services for the 2012 Pavement Management Program, Turners Crossroads, in an amount not to exceed $35,500. ona . avis Community Center ��ac enwood Ave � , . , _._�y, � � � ��ty Rd 4 , �-� � y 4 ai � Q � L .� L U � Turnpik�, � K��' �c-�' N a 3 ti� � � J y� O � � � N N O L U �, Colonial Dr L � � L O � O �5�. Laurel Ave d - Turnpike R R�,� 1 � son Rd �pike Rd O Golden Hills Dr � � Circle Down 0 �. v� � N ,y o � � y Alley N L � c L � ��__—__��__—__��__��_} � ;...... ,..�::._-= �*^^'�a� '.�;_..,. ..,..,,, _.. . ___-. Hwy 394 � • , ,..�„� -------------- -------------1 � g �rontage Rd ; A°'�,� `�9 � GL � � ♦ � �� `�� e% I � � � I � I , � I Locat�on Map e 2012 PMP - Turners Crossroad S. NottoScale Resolution 11-33 June 21, 2011 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE 2011 AND 2012 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE TURNERS CROSSROAD BETWEEN INTERSTATE 394 AND GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE WHEREAS, it is proposed to reconstruct the street listed below and to assess the benefited properties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 for the following street: • Turners Crossroad, between Interstate 394 and Golden Hills Drive. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota that the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvements are feasible and as to whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvements, and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. �� J �-��f ; (//��, J' .' ��, ?o,; _ , �-� �- `�.` i' _\, June 6,2011 RE: Golden Va11ey 2012 Pavement Management Program Turner's Crossroad Amendment City Project No. 1201 SEH No. GOLDV 110544 7eannine Clancy Director of Public Works City of Golden Valley , 3400 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley,MN 55427 Dear Jeannine: Now that the Metropolitan Council has determined the alignment of their 18 inch diameter force ma.in,the work to rehabilita.te the portion of Turner's Crossroad from Circle Down to the southern terminus can be completed. Tlus letter serves as an amendment to the original Supplemental Letter Agreement for design services for the 2011 and 2012 PMP, in accorda.nce with the Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Golden Valley and SEH. Background In 2010, The City of Golden Valley proposed to reha.bilitate streets in two neighborhoads to design in 2010 and 2011 and then construct in 2011 and 2012.At tha.t time,the portion of Turners Crossroad from . Circle Down to the southern terminus at I394 was proposed to be included. It was eventually removed from the project because of the unlmown route and schedule of the MCES force main project. Now that the alignment for the force ma.in has been determined,SEH has been asked to add the 625 foot segment to the plans proposed for constcuction in 2012. Scope of Work Preliminary Survey Additional survey will not be needed.Survey was obtained at the same time as the other work in the area. Public Involvement Additional public involvement in terms of neighborhood meetings or newsletter is not anticipated. We ha.ve included meeting time to meet with adjacent property owners. For the purpose of this proposal, we have included time for the PM,to attend three separate meetings with each property owner. Project Communication/Meetings We propose to arrange meetings for this additional work as needed, coordinating them as much as possible to coincide with the force main meetings.For the purpose of this proposal we have estimated the need for two meetings;one to review the preliminary design and then one at the end of the design. Geotechnical Street Analysis and Report A boring was taken on this street segment along with the other nearby work. No other geotechnical work is anticipated. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.,3535 Vadnais Center Drive,St.Paul,MN 55110-5196 SEH is an equal opportunity employer � www.sehinc.com � 651.490.2000 � 800.325.2055 � 651.490.2150 fax Jeannine Clancy June 6,2011 Page 2 Sidewalks and Trails There are some existing sidewalks on this portion of the Turner's Crossroads that we will need to evaluate and discuss with the City and property owners. Preliminary,Final Design and Plan Preparation SEH will prepare preliminary street and utility design for the azea.. Existing profiles and alignments will be reviewed and optimized for drainage,storm sewer added as needed,and driveway grades reviewed and improved if possible. The condition of the water main and sanitary sewer is not lrnown at ttus time, but we included time for some replacement and repairs if needed in addition to the routine maintenance and adjustments because of the new consiruction. The plans will be prepared according to City standards and submitted to the City staff for review and approval and then incorporated into the 2012 PMP set of plans Project Team Sue Mason and Dan Erickson will comprise the team, attending the project staff ineetings and property owner meetings as needed. Dan Erickson is assigned to the project as the Project Engineer, providing preliminary and final design,concrete evaluation and technical production work. Schedule The feasibility report is anticipated for September/October 2011,public hearing in November, with fmal design and plans following for a bid opening in early 2012. Compensation SEH proposes to be compensated for the scope of work proposed in this Agreement on an hourly basis. The attached ma.n hour task worksheet details the scope of work proposed. Compensation will be based on the hourly cost of personnel plus reimbursable expenses, including reproductions, mileage and equipment.We have estimated the services described above to cost a total of$35,500. This agreement is an understanding of the project to date. If this da�ument satisfactorily sets forth you understanding of our agreement,please sign in the space below and return one copy to our office. We look forwazd to working with you, your staff and the community on t}us project. Thanks for the opportunity to continue to work with the City of Golden Valley. Respectively submitted, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON IlVC. �° l ' ' l�`''P'''\ Su M.Mason,P.E. cipal Approved this day of ,2011 City of Golden Valley,Minnesota By , s:�fjig\golAvlco�n�2011 pmpVe[teragreement2011a�4n Tarners Crossroad(June 2011) F'ile:S:�F.I�C,\Go1dvlCommon�pmposals\Tinneis CrossroadlTumeis Worktasks.xls City of Golden Valley SEH No. 110544 Turners Crossroad(June Z011) Deliverables: 11°z17°Plans and SpeeificaHons for City review and constructlon plans for biddtng. Engineer's esHmate. Task �ager PE Lead T�h Admin 1 Public Involvement Pro owner meetings(3 meetings) 12 10 2 Z Pro ect Communtca8on/Meetings Desiga c�ordination meetings(3 meetings) 12 10 Ci lan review m�tin (1 meeting) 2 8 2 3 Side�valks aad Tralls Sidewalk evaluation 2 4 Z City croordinadon 4 2 4 Prellminary,Final Design and Plan PreparaHon Record drawing review and basemap update 4 12 Storm sewer design 8 4 Horizontal geometrics 2 8 Giading sheet(includ�setting gcades) 8 12 Uh7ity sheet 4 10 Stocro sheet 4 10 Alignment lan 2 8 SWPPP 2 8 T ical S�tions 2 8 Struct�ue schedules g Signingtabula6on 4 Intecsection deta�ls 8 2 Cm�sections 4 8 Design coordinaiton 2 4 4 Feasi'b7ity Report 8 16 16 4 Total hours 276 38 116 114 . 8 Projed labor cost thisphase $33,958 Equlpment charges Mlleage 250 Computers 792 ReproducUons 500 Misc. Total aroied cost t1tLc tack $35500 Unique comoonents or assamuflona: City pays for bid advertising. Ylans will be part of'the 1U 12 YMY planset 6/6/1011 Page 1 of 7 P-115963 fy Planning O �� a, e 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 3. G. Authorization to Sign Letter of Support for the Bassett Creek Regional Trail Boone Avenue - TH 100 Transportation Enhancement (TE) Grant Application Prepared By Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Summary The Three Rivers Park District has requested the City of Golden Valley provide a letter of support for its application for a federal Transportation Enhancement (TE) Grant. The grant would provide funding for the construction of a 2.8 mile segment of the proposed Bassett Creek Regional Trail. The proposed trail will ultimately connect Theodore Wirth Park to French Regional Park. This particular grant application would fund a segment of the trail through cities of New Hope and Crystal (see attached map). The segment of trail that would cross through Golden Valley is considered the final phase of this project, and is not yet in the construction planning phase. If awarded this grant, the New Hope and Crystal trail segment construction could begin as early as 2012. Attachments Bassett Creek Regional Trail: Boone Avenue /TH 100 Project Description and Map (1 page) Draft Letter of Support (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to authorize Mayor Loomis to sign a Letter of Support for the Bassett Creek Regional Trail Boone Avenue -TH 100 Transportation Enhancement (TE) Grant Application. Bassett Creek Regional Trail: Boone Avenue � TH 100 Project Description and Map SAFETEA-LU Transportation Enhancement Program (TE) Application Construct approximately 2.8 miles of new multi-use regional trail between Boone Avenue in the City of New Hope and Trunk Highway 100 (TH 100) in the City of Crystal. The trail is proposed within the right-of-way and/or parkland of Boone Avenue, Northwood Park, Winnetka Avenue, 36th Avenue, Nevada Avenue, and 32nd Avenue. Partial road reconstruction is anticipated is selection trail segments to accommodate the trait within the existing road right-of-way. The preliminary construction estimate is $1,000,000. The route is identified on the below map. Robbinsdale :� L ..., ��. � ,�.. .. � ..h r � g � .. ., : - . a _,.. ,,�. . • . , _ � ; ? � . � _ � s _ ,�+».�� . ��.` ..._... ' .. _ f�..,-. . � .t..�,,.. . ,�oa.�.., . i ...... - .•� ,, New Hope ,...r. .�.�. ..... 30: ��w ,.,.a ; , .,. V .. ...y., *Y ..,.,, Crystal _ ° ..,, .,, .,. = ` - ;�o. , . Bassen Creek Reyional Trail Cortidor �±-�,. �i�..�_`�� • � � t � .u.,.,t e.s:rt�creea � � �� { :��: � ,•E° � �� Regfonal Trail . � p , `. F ...�n ° � ' � .�0_ t �="i � ' • 1e . • �oo. ; " 3 ., ., �-� , } ; .,,:...•; _ •• ' 16 _ . : ; r.x � .T . . urw •� � i' . 16 �70� ' ..F..- ..,...�,. Golden Valley Bassett Creek Regional Trail � Site Level Map f_ � ��... _ , . , . . . „ . -..� ' . �t ` T'hreeRivers o.... 1.,.�`�".,..,„u,�. ,.-.. .,._ � o ocs ozs oswd. 3i"'6'°"oarv�..,�.m«rt,�«,r,.�urnA.r.,y�,,. PARK PISTRICT .,..,.r."�a�wa.s.� f, n� �.:�" V r✓ a O✓ f � �»zv�w.ca:golden-valley.mn.us June 22, 2011 ... : ��,eP��a,�,e,,�,, ;C,ry Ha11 Mr. Don DeVeau, Director �,, �-�soo Uo�aen vsuey Road Department of Planning and Development co�ae�v�leY,Mr, ss4z�-4ssa Three Rivers Park District 7G3-593-8000 3000 Xenium Lane North ��3-5�3-ato��e�> PI mouth, MN 55441-1299 �a�7G3-593-3968(T"I'Y) Y a Ntayor aad coun��1 RE: Letter of Support for Bassett Creek Regional Trail :��3-s�3-soo� SAFETEA-LU Transportation Enhancement Program (TE) Application 'C`ry i"Ia"ager Dear Mr. DeVeau: �;763-593-8002 "r Pub1,�safery The City of Golden Valley supports Three Rivers Park District (Park District) � roi;��: ��3-5�3-so�� 2011 SAFETEA-LU Transportation Enhancement Program application for the F�re: ��3-5�s-so�� Bassett Creek Regional Trail: Boone Avenue to TH 100. The proposed project ��3-s�3-so�a tf�� involves the construction of a 2.8 mile, off-road, bicycle and pedestrian regional trail segment between Boone Avenue in the City of New Hope and Trunk Puh�i�Works Highway (TH) 100 in the City of Crystal. Completing this trail gap will ��i�3-s�3-ao3o complement adjacent trail segments currently constructed. ,:763-5933988(faY) ;;Inspe��lons The entire seven mile Bassett Creek Regional Trail corridor connects the ?��3-s�3-so�o Minneapolis Grand Rounds (Theodore Wirth Regional Park) to French Regional ��3-s�3-3��e�� Park through the communities of Minneapolis, Golden Valley, Crystal, New Hope and Plymouth. ; Motor Uehicle Licensing � � u ��3-5�3-slo� The project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and will allow pedestrians and bicyclists of all abilities to safely and conveniently access P1a„n;ng and zon�ng griarwood Nature Area and Scheid Park in the City. The Bassett Creek ��3-s�3-so�s Regional Trail will also provide transportation and recreational connections to .F;,,�n�e the Minneapolis Grand Rounds and the broader regional park and trail network, �:7�3-s�3-s�,3 and access to vital employment and retail centers for a number of communities along the trail that are currently underserved by regional trail facilities. Assessing `��3-s�s-so2o Thank you for seeking funding on this regionally significant project. Park and Recreation Sincerely, y;Z00 Brookview Parkway 'Golden Valley,MN 5542(-1364 �763-512-2345 �763-512-2344(f�) �`��3-s�3-3�ca�TT� Linda R. Loomis Mayor City of Golden Valley ��4 °� � + �..c� ..- ... G' � ! �� , , � Public Works o � ae .- 763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 4. A. 2010 NPDES Phase II, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), Annual Report to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works AI Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor Summary The City of Golden Valley is included in a group of communities with populations greater than 10,000 that are required to obtain a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for managing nonpoint source storm water. Nonpoint source storm water is generally the overland flow of storm water that does not originate from a single pipe. The Phase II National Pollution and Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting process required cities such as Golden Valley to file a Phase II NPDES permit with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency by March 10, 2003. The permit application addressed how the City regulates and improves storm water discharges, and includes a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) addressing all the requirements of the permit. The current permit is scheduled to expire in 2011. A reissuance of the permit is currently undergoing a public review process. Golden Valley's SWPPP addresses the six minimum control measures outlined in the permit requirements. Many of the Best Management Practices, required in the NPDES permit, have already been developed in accordance with the City's Surface Water Management Plan. The six minimum control measures of the permit are: 1. Public Outreach and Education 2. Public Involvement and Participation 3. Illicit Discharge, Detection and Elimination 4. Construction Site Runoff Control 5. Post Construction Runoff Control 6. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping An annual public meeting and preparation of a report is a requirement of the NPDES permit. The meeting has been advertised for June 21, 2011 at 7 pm. The City must create a record of the public comments received, either written or oral. The public input must be considered and a record of decision must be added to the annual report. Attachments Minimum Control Measure Summary (5 pages) Resolution Issuing a Negative Declaration of Need for Revisions to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (1 page) Recommendation Motion to adopt the Resolution Issuing a Negative Declaration of Need for Revisions to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Minimum Control Measure Summarv This section summarizes the existing and planned Best Management Practices (BMP) selected by the City of Golden Valley. 1. Public Education and Outreach (BOLD I.D#S—Minimum Permit Requirements) Existing Planned Responsible Implement I.D.# BMP Description BMP BMP Manaaer Date 1.A.1 Develop a Storm Water Communications X Communication Active Plan Coordinator 1.A.2 Website-Water Resource Education and X Communication Active InforrTlation Coordinator 1.A.3 Water Resource Educational Materials X Communication Active Coordinator 1.A.4 New Resident Packets �( Communication Active Coordinator 1.A.5 Local Cable TV Scroll Education X Communication Active Coordinator 1.A.6 City Newsletter X Communication Active Coordinator 2.B ConductAnnual Public Meeting �( Environmental Active Coordinator 2.D.1 Volunteer Storm Drain Stenciling Program X Environmental Active Coordinator 2.D.2 Adopt a Storm Drain Program �( Environmental Active Coordinator Environmental 3.D �nform Public of Hazards Associated with X Coordinator, 2006 Illicit Discharges Chief of Fire 8 Inspections 6.A.1 Park Maintenance Staff Trainin �( Park Maintenance Active g Supervisor StreeWehicle 6.A.2 Vehicle Maintenance Staff Training X Maintenance Active Su ervisor New Construction and Land Disturbance Public Works 6.A.3 MaintenanceStaffTraining X MManaaer� Active utilities 6.A.4 Storm Sewer Maintenance Staff Training X Maintenance Active Su ervisor G:WPDES PHASE IlWnnual Reports�2010Wlinimum Control Measure Summary for 2010 SWPPP.docx 1 2. Public Involvement and Participation (BOLD I.D#S—Minimum Permit Requirements) Existing Planned Responsible Implement I.D.# BMP Description BMP BMP Manaqer Date 2.A Public Notice Re uirements for SWPPP X Environmental Active p Coordinator 2.B Conduct Annual Public Meeting X Ecoord atoral Active 2.0 Consider Public In ut Re ardin SWPPP X Environmental Active p g 9 Coordinator 2.D.1 Volunteer Storm Drain Stencilin Pro ram X Environmental Active g g Coordinator 2.D.2 Adopt a Storm Drain Program �( Environmental Active Coordinator 2.D.3 BCWMC Public Meetings X Environmental Active Coordinator 2.D.4 Environmental Commission �( Environmental Active Coordinator 3. Illicit Discharge, Detection and Elimination (BOLD I.D#S—Minimum Permit Requirements) Existing Planned Responsible Implement I.D.# BMP Description BMP BMP Manaper Date 3.A.1 Storm Sewer System Map X City Engineer Active Bassett Creek Inventory (outfalls, culverts, Environmental 3.A.2 significant erosion sites and obstructions) X Coordinator Active Environmental 3.g Develop Regulatory Mechanisms X Coordinator, 2007 Prohibiting Non-Storm Water Discharges Chief of Fire& Ins ections Program to Detect and Address Illicit Chief of Fire& 3.C.1 Connections X Inspections 2008 Program to Detect and Address Illegal Environmental 3.C.2 Dumping X Coordinator 2008 Environmental 3.D Inform Public of Hazards Associated with X coordinator, 2008 Illicit Discharges Chief of Fire& Ins ections G:INPDES PHASE IlWnnual Reports�2010Wlinimum Control Measure Summary for 2010 SWPPP.docx 2 4. Construction Site Runoff Control (BOLD I.D#S—Minimum Permit Requirements) Existing Planned Responsible Implement I.D.# BMP Description BMP BMP Manaqer Date Review and Revise Existing Grading, Environmental 4.A.B Drainage, and Erosion Control Ordinance X Coordinator Active PW Project 4.0 Construction Site Waste Disposal and X Coordinator, Active Debris Storage Chief of Fire& Ins ections 4.D Procedure for Site Plan Review Process X Planning Director Active Environmental 4.E Procedure for Non-Compliance Complaints X Coordinator, Active and Reports Chief of Fire& Ins ections 4.F Procedure for Site Inspection and X Environmenta� Active Enforcement Coordinator 4.A.B Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control X Environmental Active BfOChUf@ Coordinator 5. Post Construction Runoff Control (BOLD I.D#S—Minimum Permit Requirements) Existing Planned Responsible Implement I.D.# BMP Description BMP BMP Manaaer Date 5.A Watershed BMP Requirements for X City Engineer Active Improvement and Development Proposals 5.6.1 �atershed Regulatory Mechanisms for X Environmental Active Post-Construction Runoff coordinator 5.6.2 Ordinance Limiting the Use of Phosphorus X Environmental Active Coordinator Tree Preservation Ordinance �( Environmental Active 5.6.3 Coordinator 5.0 BMP Maintenance A reements �( Environmental Active g Coordinator G:WPDES PHASE IlWnnual Reports�2010Wlinimum Control Measure Summary for 2010 SWPPP.docx 3 6. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping (BOLD I.D#S—Minimum Permit Requirements) Existing Planned Responsible Implement I.D.# BMP Descriation BMP BMP Manaaer Date Parks&Golf 6.A.1 Park/Golf Maintenance Staff Training X Maintenance Active Supervisor StreeWehicle 6.A.2 Vehicle Maintenance Staff Training X Maintenance Active Su ervisor 6.A.3 New Construction and Land Disturbance Public Works MaintenanceStaffTraining X MManaaer� Active utilities 6.A.4 Storm Sewer Maintenance Staff Training X Maintenance Active Su ervisor StreeWehicle 6.6.1A Automobile Maintenance Program X Maintenance Active Su ervisor StreeWehicle 6.B.1B Parking Lot and Street Cleaning X Maintenance Active Su ervisor Utilities 6.B.1C Storm Drain System Cleaning X Maintenance Active Su ervisor 6.6.1 D Hazardous Materials Management X Chief of Fire& Active Inspections Public Works 6.B.1 E Road Salt Storage and Handling X Maintenance Active Mana er Vehicle 6.B.1 F Used Oil Recycling X Maintenance ACtive Foreman 6.6.1 G Develop a Spill Response Plan �( Chief of Fire& 2008 Inspections Inspect Annually All Structural Pollution Public Works 6'B'2 Controls X Maintenance Active Mana er 6.6.3 �nspect Annually 20% of OutFalls, Basins, Ponds X City Engineer Active Exposed Stockpile, Storage and Material Public Works 6.B.4 Handlin Areas X Maintenance 2006 g Mana er 6.6.5 Determine Need for Repair of Outfalls, X City Engineer Active Basins, Ponds 6.B.6 Inspection Annual Report X City Engineer Active 6 B.7 Establish Record Keeping System to Track X Environmental Active AGtivities Coordinator 1.A.1 Develop a Storm Water Communications Communication Plan X Coordinator ACtive 1.A.2 Website-Water Resource Education and X Communication Active Infomlation Coordinator 1.A.3 Water Resource Educational Materials X Communication Active Coordinator G:WPDES PHASE IlWnnual Reports�2010Wlinimum Control Measure Summary for 2010 SWPPP.docx 4 7. Additional BMPs (BOLD I.D#S—Minimum Permit Requirements) Existing Planned Responsible Implement I.D.# BMP Descriation BMP BMP Manaqer Date IX.A Discharge Affecting Source Water Environmental Protection Areas X Coordinator 2006 IV.D Impaired Waters Review Process X Environmental 2009 Coordinator G:WPDES PHASE IlWnnual Reports�2010Wlinimum Control Measure Summary for 2010 SWPPP.docx 5 Resolution 11-34 June 21, 2011 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ISSUING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF NEED FOR REVISIONS TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WHEREAS, the City prepared and submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) its permit application for operation of the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) on March 10, 2003; and WHEREAS, the permit required that the City develop a plan for regulating and improving storm water discharge commonly referred to as the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP); and WHEREAS, staff has been working to meet the objectives set forth in the SWPPP and is required to report to the MPCA on the status of the plan's implementation on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, the City has placed notification of a public hearing in the City's official newspaper and has held a public hearing to report on progress made in implementation of the SWPPP and to take public testimony; and WHEREAS, comments made during the public hearing will be incorporated into the City Council record. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Golden Valley has determined that no revisions to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) are required and staff is hereby directed to file the annual report with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATf EST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. �� Planning � `. �� , e 763-593-8095/763-593-8108 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Goiden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #459 -Amending Section 11.23: Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) Regarding Allowing Senior and Physical Disability Housing as a Conditional Use Prepared By Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Summary The Planning Department proposes to amend Chapter 11.23: Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) of City Code to allow high density senior and physical disability housing with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The R-3 Zoning District permits housing with a density of up to 12 units per acre. Under this proposal, senior and physical disability housing would not have a maximum density limit but rather would be regulated through the CUP process. Attachments Planning Commission Minutes dated May 9, 2011 (2 pages) Underlined/Overscored version of Section 11.23: Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) (4 pages) Ordinance #459 -Amending Section 11.23: Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) Regarding Allowing Senior and Physical Disability Housing as a Conditional Use (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #459, Amending Section 11.23: Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) Regarding Allowing Senior and Physical Disability Housing as a Conditional Use. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 A gular meeting of the Planning mmission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Coun ' Chambers, 7800 Golden V' Iley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, May 9, 20 '9+.Chair Waldhauser ca�ed the meeting to order at 7 pm. �_ --, Those present were � ing Coml ission `Cera, Kisch, Kluchka, Schmidgall, Segelbaum and Waldhause�. o pr '�t was Director of Planning and Development Mark Grimes, City Planner Joe H� ` . om, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioner McCarty was. `se t. - F F 1. Approval of nutes Mar 28, 2011 Regular PI nning Commission Meeting M D by Cera, seconded by K ' chka and motion carried unanimously to approve the arch 28, 2011 minutes as subm tted. 2. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Amendment—Adding High Density Senior and Physical Disability Housing as a Conditional Use in the Medium Density (R-3) Residential Zoning District Section of City Code —ZO00-86 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To allow higher density senior and physical disabitity housing with a Conditional Use Permit in the Medium Density (R-3) Residential zoning district Hogeboom explained that as a result of the Comprehensive Plan update in 2008 there are several areas in the City designated for High Density Residential. There are two areas in particular that would have to be rezoned to High Density Residential (R-4) which might not be appropriate for the levels of traffic associated with a high density use. He stated the consensus of the City Council is that senior housing may be a good option for these areas because there is typically less traffic and it is not at peak hours. As a result, staff is recommending that the Zoning Code be amended to add High Density Senior and Physical Disability Housing as a conditional use in the Medium Density (R-3) zoning district so that these areas could be rezoned to R-3 instead of R-4. Grimes added that this proposed change allows the City to require a traffic study as part of the Conditional Use process which is another reason staff feels comfortable with this recommendation. Kisch asked if there were additional constraints considered beyond height limitations in the R-3 zoning district. Hogeboom said there aren't any additional tests that developments have to meet beyond the tests already required when considering a Conditional Use Permit application. Grimes stated that a development would still be subject to setback requirements, impervious surface requirements, parking requirements, and other R-3 zoning district requests when applying for a Conditional Use Permit. Waldhauser opened the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 9, 2011 Page 2 � Larry Kueny, 7303 Ridgeway Road, said there is talk of a developer wanting to build senior housing at the corner of Harold and Winnetka. He said his main concern is if the developer owns the properties in question and if the property owners have been contacted by the City regarding the rezoning of their properties. He said he is also concerned about the area being "pigeon holed" for senior housing and he does not understand the process. Hogeboom explained that there is a developer who has an option to purchase six of the approximately 18 properties in the Harold and Winnetka area, but they have not submitted an application for development at this point. He explained that there will be a public meeting/open house for residents on June 23 and notifications will be mailed in advance of that meeting. The meeting will present road improvements for Harold Avenue and the impact of higher density housing on the proposed and existing street system. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public hearing. Waldhauser asked if the City could deny a request or place further restrictions such as height limitations on developments if they are required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit. Grimes stated that conditions could be added as part of the Conditional Use Permit application process. However, there would need to be good reasons and findings in order to deny an application. Waldhauser said the proposal seems to be a good solution to providing more housing options and will give the City more latitude and control when considering Conditional Use Permit applications. Segelbaum noted that the definitions for Senior Housing and Physical Disability Housing should be capitalized when they are used in the Zoning Code. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of amending the City Code to allow High Density Senior and Physical Disability Housing with a Conditional Use Permit in Section 11.23, Medium Density (R-3) Residential zoning district based on the following findings: • Senior and Physical Disability housing creates lower levels of traffic than does intergenerational housing. • Traffic generated from Senior and Physical Disability housing residents and employees typically occurs during off-peak times. • Dwelling units in Senior and Physical Disability housing can be smaller, on average, than dwelling units in intergenerational housing. (As would be the case in memory care and assisted living communities.) • Senior, Physical Disability, and lifecycle housing is identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a needed housing product type in the City of Golden Valley. • Allowing higher density Senior and Physical Disability housing to be built in the Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) would provide more opportunities to increase the housing type in the City. § 11.23 Section 11.23: Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) is to provide for medium density, non-senior or physical disability, housing (up to ten (10) units per acre with potential for twelve (12) units per acre with density bonuses) along with directly related and complementary uses. Senior and �hysical disabilitv housing is permitted to a density in excess of twelve 12) units per acre or up to five (5) stories or sixty (60 feet in height with a Conditional Use Permit. Subdivision 2. District Established Properties shall be established within the R-3 Zoning District in the manner pravided for in Section 11.90, Subdivision 3 of this Chapter, and when thus established shall be incorporated in this Section 11.23, Subdivision 2 by an ordinance which makes cross-reference to this Section 11.23 and which shall become a part hereof and of Section 11.10, Subdivision 2 thereof, as fully as if set forth herein. In addition the R-3 Zoning Districts thus established, and/or any subsequent changes to the same which shall be made and established in a similar manner, shall be reflected in the official zoning map of the City as provided in Section 11.11 of this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Permitted Uses The following uses and no other shall be permitted in the R-3 Zoning District: A. Townhouses B. Two-family dwellings C. Multiple-family dwellings of twelve (12) units or less per acre D. Foster Family Homes E. Essential Services, Class I F. No more than one (1) kitchen area and one (1) kitchenette shall be permitted in each dwelling unit. Subdivision 4. Accessory Structures The following accessory structures and no others shall be permitted in R-3 Zoning Districts: A. Enclosed parking structures similar in construction and materials to the principal structure Go/den Valley City Code Page 1 of 4 § 11.23 B. Storage structures similar in construction and materials to the principal structure not exceeding five hundred (500) square feet in area. No accessory structure shall be erected in the R-3 Zoning District to exceed a height of one (1) story, which is ten (10) feet from the floor to the top horizantal member of a frame building to which the rafters are fastened, known as the top plate. C. Accessory structures D. Private indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, including but not limited to swimming pools and tennis courts E. Underground parking structures Subdivision 5. Conditional Uses The following conditional uses may be allowed after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: A. Residential facilities serving twenty-five (25) or more persons. B. Group Foster Homes C. Principal structures in excess of four (4) stories or forty-eight (48) feet D. Senior and physical disability housing to a density in excess of twelve �12) units per acre or up to five (5) stories or sixty (60� feet in height E. Retail sales, Class I and II restaurant establishments, and professional offices within principal structures containing twenty (20) or more dwelling units when located upon any minor or major arterial street. Any such sales, establishment or office shall be located only on the ground floor and have direct access to the street. Subdivision 6. Buildable Lots In the R-3 Zoning District a lot of a minimum area of fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet shall be required for any principal structure. A minimum lot width of one hundred (100) feet at the front setback line shall be required. Subdivision 7. Corner Visibility All structures in the R-3 Zoning District shall meet the requirements of the corner visibility requirements in Chapter 7 of the City Code. Subdivision 8. Easements No structures in the R-3 Zoning District shall be located in dedicated public easements. Golden Valley City Code Page 2 af 4 § 11.23 Subdivision 9. Maximum Coverage by Building and Impervious Surfaces Structures, including accessory structures, shall not occupy more than forty percent (40%) of the lot area. Total impervious surface on any lot shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. Subdivision 10. Principal Structures Principal structures in the R-3 Zoning District shall be governed by the following requirements: A. Setback Requirements. The following structure setbacks shall be required for principal structures in the R-3 Zoning District. 1. Front Setback. The required minimum front setback shall be twenty- five (25) feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. An open front porch for each building, with no screens, may be built on the ground level to within seventeen (17) feet of a front property line along a street right-of-way line. 2. Side and Rear Yard Setback. When directly abutting any R-1 Zoning District, the required side and rear yard setback shall be thirty (30) feet. In all other instances, the required side and rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet. B. Maximum Density. Dwelling units shall not be built at a rate greater than ten (10) units per acre, unless they meet the provisions of Subdivision 12. C. Height. No building shall exceed four (4) stories or forty-eight (48) feet in height, whichever is less. Senior and physical disability housing shall not exceed five (5) stories or sixty (60) feet in height. Subdivision 11. Enclosed Parking Structures and other Accessory Uses Enclosed parking structures and accessory uses in the R-3 Zoning District shall be governed by the following requirements: A. Setback requirements. The following structure setbacks shall be required for all enclosed parking structures and other accessory uses in the R-3 Zoning District. 1. Front Setback. The required minimum front setback shall be twenty- five (25) feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. 2. Side and Rear Yard Setback. The required minimum side and rear setback for enclosed parking structures shall be thirty (30) feet when abutting any R-1 Zoning District and twenty (20) feet in all other Golden Valley City Code Page 3 of 4 § 11.23 instances. The required minimum side and rear setback for other accessory uses shall be fifteen (15) feet. 3. Separation Between Structures. Accessory structures shall be located no less than ten (10) feet from any principal structure and from any other accessory structure. Subdivision 12. Density Bonus Multiple Family dwellings providing sidewalks as required by the City shall be granted one (1) of the following density bonuses. A. Underground parking. The provision of one (1) or more underground parking space per dwelling unit shall increase the maximum allowable density by two (2) units per acre. B. Public Transit. Scheduled public transit route within one thousand (1000) feet of the primary entrance accessed by public sidewalk shall result in an increase in the maximum allowable density by one (1) unit per acre and reduce required parking to one and one half (1.5) spaces per dwelling. C. Recreation. Indoor or outdoor recreation facilities such as swimming pools, porches, tennis courts, or other facilities requiring a substantial investment equaling at minimum five percent (5%) of the construction cost of the principal structure shall increase the maximum allowable density by two (2) units per acre. Source: Ordinance No. 372, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 Golden Valley City Code Page 4 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 459, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Section 11.23: Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) Regarding Allowing Senior and Physical Disability Housing as a Conditional Use The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Section 11.23 entitled "Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3)" is amended Subdivision 1. Purpose to read as follows: Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) is to provide for medium density, non-senior or physical disability, housing (up to ten (10) units per acre with potential for twelve (12) units per acre with density bonuses) along with directly related and complementary uses. Senior and physical disability housing is permitted to a density in excess of twelve (12) units per acre or up to five (5) stories of sixty (60) feet in height with a Conditional Use Permit. Section 2. City Code Section 11.23 entitled "Medium Density Residential �oning District (R-3)" is amended by adding Subdivision 5(D) to read as follows: ' D. Senior and physical disability housing to a density in excess of twelve (12) units per acre or up to five (5) stories or sixty (60) feet in height Section 3. City Code Section 11.23 entitled "Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3)" is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of Subdivision 10 (C) as follows: ...Senior and physical disability housing shall not exceed five (5) stories or sixty (60) feet in height. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 21st day of June 2011. /s/Linda R. Loomis Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Susan M. VirniA Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk Git� �� a.f Planning 0 ' �� a, e 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 4. C. Public Hearing - Ordinance #460 - First Consideration - Interim Ordinance Imposing a Twelve Month Moratorium - Portion of Douglas Drive Corridor- Block 1 and 2, Expressway International Park and Approve Summary Publication Prepared By Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Summary In June, 2010, the City adopted an Interim Ordinance which placed a one-year moratorium on development within the area located at the northeast intersection of Trunk Highway 55 and Douglas Drive. The Douglas Drive Corridor Study identified this area to be suitable for the development of a corporate campus. During the moratorium, staff examined ways in which to accommodate a corporate campus setting on the moratorium area site. Staff seeks to extend reestablish a moratorium on the site by for an additional twelve months to allow further study and analysis of the area. Staff anticipates concluding the study in advance of the full twelve months. The anticipated outcome of the study will be the recommendation of a new mixed-use zoning district that emphasizes corporate campus development. Because of timing issues, staff recommends that the Council do the following: adopt Ordinance #460 on First Consideration, Suspend the rules so no Second Consideration is necessary and approve the summary publication. Attachments Ordinance #460, Interim Ordinance Imposing a Twelve Month Moratorium on Certain Development in Expressway International Park (Blocks 1 and 2) in the Douglas Drive Corridor, Golden Valley, Minnesota (7 pages) Summary of Ordinance #460, Interim Ordinance Imposing a Twelve Month Moratorium on Certain Development in Expressway International Park (Blocks 1 and 2) in the Douglas Drive Corridor, Golden Valley, Minnesota (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt on First Consideration, Ordinance#460, Interim Ordinance Imposing a Twelve Month Moratorium on Certain Development in Expressway International Park (Blocks 1 and 2) in the Douglas Drive Corridor, Golden Valley, Minnesota Motion to suspend the rules so no Second Consideration of Ordinance #460 is necessary. Motion to approve publication of the Summary Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 460, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINi4NCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE An Interim Ordinance Imposing a 1"welve Month Moratorium on Certain Development in Expressway International Park (Blocks 1 and 2) in the Douglas Drive Corridor, Golden Valley, Minnesota. The Ci�ty Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Preamble. 1.01. The staff for the City of Golden Valley, and the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Planning Commission and Golden Valley City Gouncil, have had ongoing discussions regarding the development of the Douglas Drive Corridor which area is depicted in "Exhibit A" attached. 1.02. In June, 2010, the City adopted an Interim Ordinance, No. 440, 2nd Series, which placed a one-year moratorium on development within the Moratorium Area (defined below). The Douglas Drive Corridor Study identified this area to be suitable for the development of a corporate campus. During the moratorium, staff has been examining ways in which to accommodate a corporate campus setting on the Moratorium Area site, however the studies and proposals for the Moratorium Area are not yet complete. 1.03. Staff for the City of Golden Valley, the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Planning Commission and the Golden Valley City Council sought to extend the moratorium on the Moratorium Area to the earlier of (i) December 11, 2011, or (ii) that date which is 120 days following the receipt of the final approval or review by any applicable federal, state or metropolitan agency when such approval is required by law to allow further study and analysis of the Moratorium Area. However, due to a deficiency of notice, proper notice was not given to extend the Interim Ordinance and Interim Ordinance No. 440, 2nd Series expired. 1.04. But to protect the planning process and preserve the welfare of the city of Golden Valley, the City Council finds it necessary to again enact an interim moratorium on certain zoning, planning and development in Expressway International Park Blocks 1 and 2 (the "Moratorium Area"), as legally described and depicted in "Exhibit B". 1.05. The City Council notes it has adopted a preliminary study relating to the Douglas Drive Corridor. The preliminary study was published in draft form on November 9, 2009, adopted by the City Council and is pending approval by the Metropolitan Council to be incorporated into Golden Valley's Comprehensive Plan (the "Preliminary Study"). 1.06. The City Council finds it necessary to further study the existing conditions of the Douglas Drive Corridor including without limitation the Douglas Drive and Highway 55 intersection, and immediately adjacent areas to the northeast, to determine the impact of comprehensive zoning changes to the development of the City within the Douglas Drive Corridor (the "Study"). 1.07. The City Council finds the Study necessary to: (i) develop and adopt policies to reinforce employment uses at the south end of the corridor, and provide common functions to serve all of the development, and (ii) develop and adopt zoning and land use control changes that would enhance the Douglas Drive Corridor's south "gateway" with a more campus-like setting, reorganize roadway access to create parcels that are more developable, and create a better link to Zane Avenue. 1.08. The City Council acknowledges that it must enact this new Ordinance to extend the protections of Interim Ordinance No. 440 but agrees in this Ordinance to make the new Ordinance effective only for the time period that an extension would have been available had proper notice been given. 1.09. Therefore, in order to protect the planning process and preserve the welfare of the citizens of the City of Golden Valley, the City Council has determined it is necessary to place a moratorium, for the term set forth in this Ordinance, prohibiting: (i) the issuance of building permits that would increase the footprint of any existing building in the Moratorium Area; (ii) the application for, and construction of, new projects in the Moratorium Area; (iii) the application for, and approval of, rezoning or subdivision of any land in the Moratorium Area; and (iv) the application for, and approval of, a planned unit development or conditional use permit in the Moratorium Area where such development, rezoning, subdivision, conditional use permit or planned unit development would otherwise nullify the import and benefits of such Study until the Study is completed and considered by the City Council and all requisite notices and hearings are accomplished. Without this moratorium, while the Study is pending, people may take actions which are permitted under the present ordinance but would not be under new restrictions. To prevent this from happening and to protect the planning process, the City Council is adopting an interim moratorium as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, Subd. 4. 1.10. This interim moratorium must be adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, Subd. 4 in order to be effective immediately. If the normal zoning ordinance process were used alone, a period of approximately sixty (60) days would elapse before the ordinance could become effective. During this significant time gap actions could be taken to prejudice the planning process. 1.11. The City Council has a substantial government interest in preserving the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Golden Valley, and accordingly, the City Council finds that an interim ordinance is needed for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the public peace, health, safety and welfare of its citizens. Section 2. Backaround. 2.01. Based on the Preliminary Study results published in draft form on November 9, 2009, the City Council adopted the Preliminary Study, its findings and recommendations, and the Preliminary Study is pending approval by the Metropolitan Council for incorporation into Golden Valley's Comprehensive Plan. 2.02. Based on the City Council's adoption of the Preliminary Study, the City Council finds it necessary to: (i) develop and adopt policies to reinforce employment uses at the south end of the corridor, and provide common functions to serve all of the development, and (ii) develop and adopt zoning and land use control changes that would enhance the Douglas Drive Corridor's south "gateway" with a more campus-like setting, reorganize roadway access to create parcels that are more developable, and create a better link to Zane Avenue. 2.03. The City Council is concerned that the City's current zoning ordinance and related ordinances may be inadequate in scope and restrictions to accomplish the goals adopted in the Preliminary Study. 2.04. The City Council finds that City staff needs additional time to conduct further studies so that the City can adopt a set of comprehensive plans and land use zoning regulations, and optimal policies pertaining to the development goals in the Preliminary Study. Such a study will address the palicy goals, land use and zoning issues raised by the Preliminary Study. 2.05. The City Council has directed that such further study be undertaken. 2.06. The City Council finds it necessary to enact this interim ordinance for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City by prohibiting: (i) the issuance of any building permits which would increase the footprint of any existing building in the Moratorium Area; (ii) the application for, and construction of, new projects in the Moratorium Area; (iii) the application for, and approval of any rezoning or subdivision within the Moratorium area; and (iv) the application for, and approval of, a planned unit development or conditional use permit in the Moratorium Area, until such further study has been completed and any modifications to the City's zoning and land use regulations are accomplished. 2.07. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, subdivision 4, permits the adoption of interim ordinances which regulate, restrict or prohibit any use during the planning process. Section 3. Plannina and Zoning Study; Moratorium. 3.01. The City Council authorizes the Study to be conducted by City staff: (i) to develop policies to reinforce employment uses at the south end of the corridor, and provide common functions to serve all of the development, and (ii) to develop zoning and land use control changes that would enhance the Douglas Drive Corridor's south "gateway" with a more campus-like setting, reorganize roadway access to create parcels that are more developable, and create a better link to Zane Avenue The scope of the study should include, but is not limited to, the following: a. the particular permitted or conditional uses allowed in the area; b. the density and concentration of such uses; and c. the effect of such uses on other uses in the surrounding area. 3.02. Upon completion of the Study, the matter is to be considered by the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation to the City Council. 3.03. The City Council adopts this Interim Ordinance pursuant to, inter alia, Minnesota Statute § 462.355, subd. 4, imposing a moratorium for the term set forth in this Ordinance prohibiting: (i) the issuance of any building permits which would increase the footprint of any existing building in the Moratorium Area; (ii) the application for, and construction of, new projects in the Moratorium Area; (iii) the application for, and approval of any rezoning or subdivision within the Moratorium Area; and (iv) the application for, and approval of, a planned unit development or conditional use permit in the Moratorium Area. During the term of the moratorium, no new or existing applications for building permits or approvals under Golden Valley Code, chapter 11 or chapter 12, shall be considered or granted which would result in: (i) development within the Moratorium Area that incorporates an increase in the footprint of any existing building in the Moratorium Area; (ii) any construction of new projects in the Moratorium Area; (iii) any rezoning or subdivision within the Moratorium Area, or (iv) any planned unit development or new conditional use in the Moratorium Area. Section 4. Enforcement. The City may enforce any provision of this ordinance by mandamus, injunction or any other appropriate civil remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. Section 5. Separabilitv. Every section, provision or part of this ordinance is declared separate from every section, provision or part of this ordinance. If any section, provision, or part of this ordinance is adjudged to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall not invalidate any other section, provision, or part of this ordinance. Section 6. Duration. This interim ordinance shall be effective immediately upon adoption and shall terminate on the earlier to occur of: (i) that date which is twelve (12) months from the effective date of this ordinance; or (ii) that date which is 120 days following the receipt of the final approval or review by any applicable federal, state or metropolitan agency when such approval is required by law. Section 7. Penal . City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and 11.99 and 12.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Adopted by the City Council this 21 st day of June, 2011. /s/Linda R. Loomis Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Susan M. Virniq Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk Dougla� Drtive IVlora�or�urn �4rea � � � .� , ,, ,,� � :�;� .::��/i'.'";��,� �, �}�,, �j11..f1�• � �' �.:7,;�/� ,�� is / �! -;�r n��y� �qJ /; .�<;i: ye„`-,�.� ;;,�,,j` i%�;� ,,..�, ii% '� ,<,�;•.�� f'�� /; /: aiso i� i /; . � �s:fo� ,r�.� �r, z. �.';ir %ji y=.�i� ' �%�' � � 8�" �u. ` �/'� �!;�/l.// 'f".'r%�i �i a � �� /i�`�� /��' /.,�:/�•.� w rr%�;� rl ��/.� �� '",� �f�� ` � ��f � :<, ' r r r:!%;y� !; . f l': /. .�! .�� . � �f��/ �� y: �..si� .��. �� f?'.';'. . f`Y � '/i /��-� �%%�� ,//f/��i;� /,Y.,'�!/�� . �.:�' k %r'1 �r l.f� /. /.'>:j M' .� �/ ��. . � `:%, ��.... � � � � �� /�� f � , � fi ;�� „f�,. �/�� , ,� /�:• e�on•�a i;,< j1 - N �.:�� r:�;il 's9oo � ��;'.. f�f//�'.F:, �� // i�/f,�� ¢,<�,;5� i(�� %f�' �-` ��j� �;'% ?%/ 58�8 i/�� /,�� , r�� /:'l.yi l/` /.� ,,,; �f �/ /// fj'ij� i lf � �j�� //� /�" � /. '1��f .:�G��:' �`%� %,/��/��/ •��`�! OL50N h1EMORINL fiFYY COUNfRYCLU9 DR IiiGHWAY S5 `}� EXHIBIT B � a + � � � � �� N � � � � � ,,� • � � � � � �g� � �c� �� ° � �� , �� e ` � i ; � � , (.SVh1H91H '1VIt1oN13Vd SdOS10's] MO'li� S5'OM AVAW9IH 31VJ.S �ao��` � i` �� ,rilri'.�'� = 'rt � i �nn�+aor � �. ��•tLr` e`�. —•OO•o0s—� �i �i -.^OL��..:�� '`� � � a.aaAVea6s�' ��.00•oyqs�t.i—� � Ctmt° S s�o� I � g� ..$.�aa�aa Ie. .�,� 'x'�l�� _ .�ea•iar••- �__-t•� ni� Aa.wstw� r�� ,se.s�.coW-.•..-�, �h . - = --�� t fa • � �ntaa e g� ! � +a+�wuu ma osmi+�w � � ,�`. - =-�s*as.== �'j��_ yn os�----— "�a ssr 1�::� � M� �,w,m�o ,��y7 z i i ' �a'?�� ±��` � ��g�~��g y4' T� I ZZt� 'ON Q9ns '4f1V .. �ero'sn'i'H�o e�n�e srtn F�. Y a�,�� n s�' .. s°,r 09i ___.___ /�/ '�N��nmare �e'tl'ap 1 W roey�t�em sn$Na!do avn 1 e q LL J � �as �~ �'+� Q � M� o I �I ; �ea � I _, '�va �E�. J t� . �`- 'i �$� a �' �8 $i �� O � ' �� n�; t � N�\ �i o I a z , l� � �' �� ' d � 'it t � �' W . � p� � ~ � ( W � $ ,�°''"�' ,—�j- ,� !� W � Z � � ';� D� �. �.�. �3 M �' d _'vI v � � °j oe.su N I� �►`;u+aia a�T� �� m Q •� �� i �� i �w �� I � ' � �� n.n �-� '.c 'f�-4 n � E r..ooeN_...`+. ;.sv aa r 1•sd� � R S � � I�� y1 kadta•-� e ' aost��. � t � � d,j��A i : e asos � f W � •� � ��w�� ,��.a �' � � I�� v= ! � "' � o' f°i{ ` �� '� �� X � � ' � J �ar� a /1 I � �� W � � ' ,• .1/��$` , j�l� yeJ J / � ( � ,�� ! I _ a� � � � ;, , ` � �� :� � . , �� g _es-,'• � �s � p �� \ ��' � - I �� ;, ¢� 1 , � � � ig •�oa � �$ �� g� ¢ <. �t " ------ '�`�y�'+��a / (u aa � � IIa " -- - �'. °'�' � o � `-----_ ___'�.—��,�+ / t �I � +�` `° �� — _' � � �-mr y�ro Y �+. --. ; m � , "Ma° A�q�W� . ■.sa e�0�9 ...__.� -..� Y � ' �'IW�M1II Myy,t�'b�7t{ -� � ' E61 09�� i ��"��,,,,�.;�.�1 ,,w «.« � � ; �a� , • ---------_---.�.. � � � rs�x�eu n�a ms m*wn m q�a enn a.cmn�`—" t . . i � � � J •� g�� ,.�:� I � a EXHIBIT B W w � ,�� I � � � � �� n . d��: � � � .� � � a� �� 8 �� s � �� ' � 1 � a� g z �� ° � �� E � r,�' �'� — � q � � � � � �� s s • �, �� ' � � � �ti �� `�� e �� . $ � g � � � � � � � � � � � � �� I � �� g I �� a�� `�, � �� . g� ��a ., � � � � � �g � �� . '� �� g �� 8 � � 8 � � �� $� �� " # � � � � �� : � � ,: $ �� , � a� � �s �� a '�� e �� " � i � �:-�� ,��4 ��R;�� i � �� ' 'a � � �� g .�� r� e '�'� � ��'e a � �� _ � � � a a- ....� _..; � � 8 � �6� � �� —� 3�� " �� g� � �� . � o � �e � � �� s �� g �� ,. � � � �� W !-- ? �� g � � �s �g } � �j 5��.� :�'�S� � ��5� �� gg�A ��"B � 9 Q � •�� a'� e�� $ �� s�� • � � �� g�� M�� g�� M9g�� _ � '�e S �'g� � �g��Y a �A�� g g'j3� B W �'��g�� .a�•T �� 3�a �� :�=�� :�C� ��a �� TT �� 4��U ��y� � � � a x 3 g §��s� �� g8a� � a e g � � a �a � "� � a�� W g �� l��u� �� p�� , �� . � g• a�8�.� �" ��,�� i� �$9 �� '9��a�8�'� e �� ax�, a,��s � � � �� ... s�s� � N� � �� ' e� ��g�� a � � g� �� ,.s � �� 4 ��.� � �� g; � � •g ��€ g�� '� s� � �g�.�' � � � �3� �"�� j �� a g� ��1.� . 8m �g g S � gd� �$ �� q,��RB ' � 8 � ge ��9g �� R��iB � A�B�� •8 �31�� +� $ � 4� �� ,�A�� $�' �� V$ g 9�I � �8 �8g �� $� �a�9 �9 � � �� $� � g � 8 ��$� �� 4 B � p'� � - � � �� ^ $ � � �b' � r . S �d ,� �� a � . �� e�r� � �g � �� $�Sa a. �$ � ��;��a �9 �� S e$~ g g�A g � '3a � �' � �� a�� - �g g�� 8�,�� . � ��a• � ��'� �� R� � � s � <��te�� 3�� a } �g� �g�a °e �- aos �� g� gg38a�m�� _�- �y�� .� ��a ��_�� 'z � � s� � �� .a� ��88� �$ a ti - ' �g- a,e�.,,� �� -� �� 8$ @�� E. ��"�� _9 8�� 9�� '� �� g � �.3 � � � �� y �� y� � g a �� g � ga��-� � B�'�� ' d � � �6�E � � g_�p $� 8 $ �� it �� g �� u�w�F� � � �� 5� g�� 8�j 2� S �� . Y 8 � g� �g S p��j@�� q g� E� R� ��'� .il�� Ug��B$� � 5 L� .�83�g ��Ga�«$� �� 9 �� ggg g� . � � ��, A�� a� � $ � ..� F�g��g �$ �� a�� t�� SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 460, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Interim Ordinance Imposing a Twelve Month Moratorium on Certain Development in Expressway International Park (Blocks 1 and 2) in the Douglas Drive Corridor, Golden Valley, Minnesota. This is a summary of the provisions of the above Ordinance which has been approved for publication by the City Council. Ordinance 460, imposes a twelve (12) month moratorium prohibiting: (i) the issuance of any building permits which would increase the footprint of any existing building in the Moratorium Area; (ii) the application for, and construction of, new projects in the Moratorium Area; (iii) the application for, and approval of any rezoning or subdivision within the Moratorium Area; and (iv) the application for, and approval of, a planned unit development or conditional use permit in the Moratorium Area. During this twelve (12) month moratorium period, no new or existing applications for building permits or approval under Golden Valley Code, Chapter 11 or Chapter 12, shall be considered or granted which would result in: (i) development within the Moratorium Area that incorporates an increase in the footprint of any existing building in the Moratorium Area; (ii) any construction of new projects in the Moratorium Area; (iii) any rezoning or subdivision within the Moratorium Area, or (iv) any planned unit development or new conditional use in the Moratorium Area pursuant to, inter alia, Minnesota Statute § 462.355, subd. 4. The Ordinance applies to Blocks 1 and 2, Expressway International Park, as identified in the attached map. The Moratorium is adopted to follow up on the Moratorium established by Ordinance No. 440, 2nd Series and the Douglas Drive Corridor Study adopted by the City Council and published in draft form on November 9, 2009, with the following purposes: (i) to develop policies to reinforce employment uses at the south end of the corridor, and provide common functions to serve all of the development, and (ii) to develop zoning and land use control changes that would enhance the Douglas Drive Corridor's south "gateway" with a more campus-like setting, reorganize roadway access to create parcels that are more developable, and create a better link to Zane Avenue. The scope of the study should include, but is not limited to, the following: a. the particular permitted or conditional uses allowed in the area; b. the density and concentration of such uses; c. the effect of such uses on other uses in the surrounding area. A violation of the ordinance may result in a misdemeanor, as provided in Sections 11.99 and 12.99 of the City Code. The moratorium is effective immediately upon adoption until 12 months following the date of publication. Adopted by the City Council this 21st day of June, 2011. Notice: A printed copy of the complete ordinance is available at City Hall. /s/Linda R. Loomis Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Susan M. Virnia Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk �it�y o,� o , �� a e �1 Police De ar#ment "` P u b I i c S a f e t y 763-593-8079/763 593-8098 (fax) � � Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 6. A. On-Sale and Sunday Sale Liquor License Renewal Prepared By Stacy A. Altonen, Chief of Police Jim Roberts, Sergeant Summary The following establishment has applied for renewal of their liquor licenses for the 2011-2012 license term. The applicants meet City Code and State requirements for the renewal of their licenses. On-Sale and Sunday Sale Osaka Golden Valley Inc, d/b/a Osaka Sushi & Hibachi Recommended Action Motion to approve the renewal of the respective liquor license for the applicant listed above for the 2011-2012 license term. Cit^y of �/ P Finance 0 '` �� N� V 763-593-8013/763-583-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Actioni Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Agenda Item 6. B. First Consideration - Ordinance #461 -Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director/City Clerk Summary As per City Code, Council salaries are reviewed every finro years preceding the city election. In 2009, the Council denied Ordinance No. 422 on its first consideration. The last Council salary increase was adopted in July 2003 and has been in effect since 2004 with no salary increases since then. As per City Code, Staff shall provide the percentage representing the average salary or wage increase for City non-union employees for the previous finro years so the Council may consider appropriate increases in its salaries. The percentages are as follows: 2010 0% 2011 1.5% CURRENT SALARY IF ADOPTED Mayor $11,619 $11,793 Council Members $8,696 $8,826 At the June Council/Manager Meeting, the direction was not to increase the annual salary for the Mayor and Council. If the Council does not want to institute a salary increase for 2012- 2013, the attached ordinance should be denied. Attachments Ordinance #461 -Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to deny Ordinance #461, Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members. ORDINANCE NO. 461, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code Section 2.19, Subd. 1., 2. and 4. are hereby amended to read: Subd. 1. The annual salary of the Mayor shall be $11,793.00. Subd. 2. The annual salary of each Council Member shall be $8,826.00. Subd. 4. The salaries provided for herein shall be effective January 1, 2012. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. /s/Linda R. Loomis Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Susan M. Virniq Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk