10-11-11 CM Agenda Packet AGENDA
Council/Manager Meeting
Golden Vailey City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Conference Room
October 11, 2011
6:30 pm or immediately following the HRA meeting
1. Tobacco Compliance Check Failure Penalties 2-3
2. Accessibility, Design, Policy and Implementation Manual for Public Rights-of-Way 4-30
3. Proposed Amendments to Snow Plowing and Ice Control Policy for City Streets, 31-40
Alleys, Parking Lots, Trails and Sidewalks ,
4. Douglas Drive Project Update 41-42
5. 2012-2013 Proposed Budget- Other Funds 43-139
6. 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program 140-258
Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed
for the Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and
provide general directions to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The
public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and listen to the discussion; public
participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council.
This document is available in alternate formats upon a 72-hour request. Please call �' `
' 763-593-8006(T1Y: 763-593-3968)to make a request. Examples of alternate formats '
may include larg�print,electronic,Braille,audiocassette,etc.
�i' ''��T`�
1',�3�. r
..- --� :� '; :,
xs ,
j � r1
'�������- � Police De artment
p ^� � P u b I i c S a f e t y 763-593-8079/763 593-8098(fax)
�
�
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
October 11, 2011
Agenda Item
1. Tobacco Compliance Check Failure Penalties
Prepared By
Nathan Gove, Commander
Summary
On September 23, 2011 the Police Department conducted compliance checks at all
establishments within the City that hold a current tobacco license. Three establishments
failed the compliance checks by selling cigarettes to the seventeen year-old checker.
City Code Section 6.34, Subdivision 13(B) was revised in July 2011, to state the Council shall
impose a civil fine "not to exceed" a certain dollar amount, and the license shall be suspended
for"not less than" a certain number of days for licensed establishments that fail compliance
checks. Police Department staff is seeking clarification as to the fee and suspension term to
ascribe to these establishments.
Attachments
City Code Section 6.34, Subdivision 13(B) (1 page)
B. Administrative Civil Penalties: Licensee. If a licensee or an employee of
a licensee is found to have violated this Section the licensee shall be charged
an administrative penalty as follows:
1. First violation. The Council shall impose a civil fine not to exceed five
hundred dollars ($500). In addition, after the first violation, the license
shall be suspended for not less than five (5) consecutive days.
2. Second violation within twenty-four (24) months. The Council shall
impose a civil fine not to exceed seven hundred fifty dollars ($750). In
addition, after the second violation, the license shall be suspended for not
less than fifteen (15) consecutive days.
3. Third violation within twenty-four (24) months. The Council shall impose a
civil fine not to exceed one thousand-dollars ($1,000). In addition, after
the third violation, the license shall be suspended for not less than thirty
(30) consecutive days.
4. Fourth violation within twenty-four (24) months. After the fourth violation
the license shall be revoked for at least one (1) year.
C. Administrative Penalty Procedures. No suspension or penalty may take
efFect until the licensee or person has received notice (served personally or
by mail) of the alleged violation and of the opportunity for a hearing before
the Council or a person authorized by the City to conduct the hearing. A
notice that a violation has occurred must be in writing and must provide that
a rlght to a hearing must be requested within ten (10) business days of
receipt of the notice or it shall terminate.
D. Misdemeanor Prosecution. Nothing in this Subdivision shall prohibit the
City from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any alleged violation of
this ordinance.
E. Defense. It is a defense to the charge of selling tobacco or tobacco-related
devices to a person under the age of eighteen (18) years, that the licensee
or individual, in making the sale, reasonably and in good faith relied upon
representation of proof of age described in Minnesota Statutes section
340A.503.
F. Exceptions. An Indian may furnish tobacco to an Indian under the age of
eighteen (18) years if the tobacco is furnished as part of a traditional Indian
spiritual or cultural ceremony. For purposes of this paragraph an Indian is a
person who is a member of an Indian tribe as defined in Minnesota Statutes
section 260.755, subd. 12.
Subdivision 14. Violation a Misdemeanor
Every person who violates a section, subdivision, paragraph or provision of this
Section, when such person performs an act thereby prohibited or declared unlawful,
t t,j� `TM
� T,
�J '',. .,
0\ � �
� � � �, e, Public Works
� 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax)
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
October 11, 2011
Agenda Item
2. Accessibility, Design, Policy and Implementation Manual for Public Rights-of-Way
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Mark Ray, PE, Engineering Technician
Summary
The United States Access Board, U.S. Department of Transportation, and U.S. Department of
Justice have released new regulations and design standards relating to the accessibility of
public facilities for pedestrian traffic. As part of these new regulations and design standards,
local municipalities are required to develop and implement transition plans meet the new
requirements. Staff has prepared a Draft Accessibility, Design, Policy and Implementation
Manual specific to public rights-of-way to satisfy the new requirements and provide a basis
for all of pedestrian system improvements.
The policy is not a stand-alone initiative, but a guide for what pedestrian provisions need to
be included when projects take place. Similar to how the Minnesota Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices dictates what, where, and when signs need to be installed, this new
accessibility and design policy will dictate what, where, and when specific pedestrian
provisions are required. In addition, the plan identifies priority areas for accessibility
improvements of the existing City pedestrian system.
Attachments
Draft Accessibility, Design, Policy and Implementation Manual for Public Rights-of-Way
(26 pages)
•
� P
City of Golden Valley
Accessibility, Design, Policy and Implementation Manual
For Public Rights-Of-Way
Table of Contents
Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1
Accessibility Policy Development and Implementation Process...........................................2
Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Policy Goals...................................................................2
Definitions ................................................................................................................................3
When Are Accessibility Upgrades Required?...........................................................................3
Accessibility Project Request Process .....................................................................................5
Accessibility Grievance Process ..............................................................................................5
DesignGuidelines....................................................................................................................5
PedestrianAccess Routes ...................................................................................................5
Curb Ramps / Blended Transitions.......................................................................................6
Detectable Warning Surfaces...............................................................................................7
Pedestrian Overpasses / Underpasses (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide) ..............8
Accessible Pedestrian Signals (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide)............................9
Street Furniture (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide).................................................10
Trails (Outdoor Developed Areas 1017).............................................................................11
PublicParking.....................................................................................................................12
FrequentlyAsked Questions..................................................................................................13
Sidewalks ...........................................................................................................................13
Curb Ramps / Blended Transitions.....................................................................................13
Signals................................................................................................................................15
Accessibility during construction.........................................................................................16
References.............................................................................................................................17
Notice of Availability of Draft Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines......................17
Special Report: Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Planning and Design for Alterations......19
Resources..............................................................................................................................24
Appendix................................................................................................................................25
G:\PROJECTS�ADA Study(05-8)\GV Accessibility Manual v.2 FINAL.docx
Introduction
Based upon new and emerging regulations, federal design guidelines, and research, the City
of Golden Valley has prepared this Design, Policy and Implementation Manual specific to
public rights-of-way as it relates to accessibility for individuals with disabilities within the
community.
Elements covered in this manual include:
.
Pedestrian Access Routes '�
• Curb Ramps / Blended Transitions
• Detectable Warning Surfaces `r
• Pedestrian Crossings �
• Accessible Pedestrian Signals ��
• Street Furnishings �����
• Trails � �
A review of published design guidelines and technical papers, and case law was conducted
by JQP, Inc. in the spring of 2010. References that were identified and used as part of the
development process included:
• United States Access Board
o Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)
o Outdoor Developed Areas
• Department of Transportation
• Department Justice
• Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Documents
• Minnesota Building Code - Chapter 1341 (July 2007)
In addition to the literature review, the City of Golden Valley conducted a review and site
inspection of the condition of curb cuts and sidewalks and has documented the findings on a
series of City maps. These maps will be used during the planning and implementation
phases.
Additionally, JQP, Inc. met with City staff and reviewed the City's documentation of
conditions. Site visits were also conducted at locations with typical conditions to the
transportation network in Golden Valley.
Fundamentally, any sidewalk, trail, street, development or redevelopment project within the
City of Golden Valley should begin with the intent of fully compliant accessibility and then be
modified while evaluating a balance between access and feasibility. The City may develop a
specific process through which exemptions for a project may be obtained.
This manual is based upon available resources and information as of June 2011. It will be
necessary to update and monitor Federal and State enforcement and case law related to
accessibility of public right-of-way as time passes, and accessibility case law interpretations.
G:\PROJECTS�ADA Study(05-8)\GV Accessibility Manual v.2 FINAL.docx 1
Accessibility Policy Development and Implementation Process
• Finalize Accessibility, Design, Policy and Implementation Manual:
o Determine applicable laws, codes and design standards for pedestrian facilities,
including curb cuts, sidewalks, crosswalks, etc.
o Conduct an assessment of the City's facilities to determine which locations do
not fully comply (noting specific features of non-compliance) - This has been
completed 2007-2008.
o Include clear language in contracting for services with architects, engineers,
contractors, landscape architects, stating that the City of Golden Valley requires
full compliance with American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other provisions
for public rights-of-way.
• Prioritize locations of needed improvements and sort them into two categories:
o Those that could be included with other projects (example: overlays,
reconstruction).
o Stand-alone improvements.
Identify work items for different improvements. ����
.
Long-range identification and budgeting for needed improvements.
• Monitor other construction by federal, state, county and private developers to
coordinate projects; i.e., state bike path project with the City of Golden Valley curb cuts
project.
� ,,:.
Public Riqhts-of-Wav Accessibilitv Policv Goals
Based upon extensive review of accessibility materials available, meetings with City staff, and
review of walkway data/maps provided by the City, JQP, Inc. recommends the following:
1. Partnership between Public Works and Inspections Departments to inform developers
and contractors of their responsibility to incorporate accessibility into their projects.
2. Prepare an informational packet and distribute to developers related to accessible curb
cuts, parking, and sidewalks.
3. Monitor private projects to facilitate accessibility improvements to the extent feasible.
4. Coordinate with developments, remodeling, and construction projects, including state,
and federal projects, to facilitate accessibility improvements to the extent feasible.
5. Proactively implement an access improvement plan using guidelines from the
published materials to improve overall network accessibility with an emphasis on
points of interest such as government facilities, transit stops, special population
residences, healthcare facilities, and public spaces.
2
Definitions
Detectable Warning Surfaces
"A surface feature of truncated dome material built in or applied to the walking surFace to
advise of an upcoming change from pedestrian to vehicular way."
Pc;destrian Access Routes
A pedestrian access route (PAR) is a continuous and unobstructed walkway within a
pedestrian circulation route specifically designed for ADA accessible travel.
Pedestrian access routes consist of the following components:
• Walkways
�.
• Ramps
• Curb Ramps (excluding flared sides) and landings ��
;
• Blended transitions �'
• Crosswalks
• Pedestrian overpasses and underpasses
• Elevators
�;
• Platform lifts
;� .
Program Access '
As required by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
public entities are obligated to not discriminate in the programs or services offered to the
"general public." Parking, sidewalks, pedestrian crossings are a feature or amenity offered by
the City of Golden Valley. It may be appropriate for Golden Valley to create a plan or special
projects to improve or provide accessibility where no work is currently scheduled.
Consideration in planning is to include location of government services, libraries, schools,
specialized housing, health care providers, or other origins or destinations of significant
volumes of pedestrian trips. Inclusion of inembers of the community to establish priorities is
encouraged.
When Are Accessibility Upgrades Required?
The following is a list of typical construction and maintenance activities conducted on
sidewalks, trails, and roads and the degree to which accessibility projects are required for
each activity.
Crack sealing — Not required
Crosswalk installation — Required
Example: Any new midblock or corner (intersection) crossing needs to be compliant.
Concrete and pavement repair— Dependent on scope of work
Example: Isolated, partial or full panel replacement does not trigger larger scale
accessibility work. However, the repair should be consistent with accessibility
guidelines such as slope and no lips over 0.5 inches when feasible. Larger concrete
repair projects may trigger additional accessibility provisions.
3
Concrete joint sealing — Not required
Concrete surface planning/grinding - Not required
Curb replacement— Dependent on scope of work
Example: If the curb replacement is at an existing or proposed pedestrian ramp
location, then it should meet ADA requirements. If the curb is not at a pedestrian
crossing then standard curb (B6-18, etc.) can be used.
Mill and Overlay — Required
Examples: For mid/partial block overlays upgrades are only required in impacted street
areas. Curb ramp must be installed where they are required, but do not exist and any
existing curb ramps must be brought into compliance (see Design Guideline section on
curb ramps).
New construction — Required
Examples: Curb cuts, sidewalks/trails, pedestrian crosswalks, traffic signal installation,
pedestrian tunnels/overpasses, and new development.
Pavement marking — Dependent on scope of work
Examples: Any pedestrian-related pavement markings should be consistent with
accessibility provisions, but do not trigger any additional accessibility projects.
Pavement markings for vehicle traffic do not trigger any additional accessibility
provisions.
Pothole patching - Not required
��
Reconstruction — Required
Examples: Roadway widening, additional vehicle/bike lanes, horizontal/vertical
alignment changes, bridge replacement, total road rehabilitation, installation of
concrete curb and gutter, traffic signal replacement, sidewalk/trail replacement.
Sealcoating - Not required
Sidewalk panel replacement — Dependent on scope of work
Example: Accessibility upgrades should be done to the extent feasible. If only one or
two panels are being replaced, then there may be no opportunity to make changes.
The higher the number of replacement sections, the better the opportunity to obtain
consistency in corridor accessibility.
Sidewalk joint grinding - Not required
Sidewalk panel bituminous patch — Dependent on scope of work
Example: The larger the patch section, the better the opportunity to accommodate
some provisions such as slope, cross-slope, and path consistency.
Skin patching - Not required
Utility patch - Dependent on scope of work
Example: A utility patch in the street or boulevard would not trigger an accessibility
project as the intended user is vehicle traffic, or no traffic. A utility patch along a trail,
sidewalk, or other pedestrian route may require accessibility provisions. Generally
4
speaking, the larger the patch area, the better the opportunity to obtain achieve
accessibility provisions.
Accessibility Project Request Process
The City of Golden Valley has established a Public Sidewalk and Trail Policy that outlines the
process for requesting new access routes. The Public Sidewalk and Trail Policy is included in
Appendix A of this manual.
Accessibility Grievance Process
The City of Golden Valley has established a grievance process for responding to concerns
about accessibility. The grievance procedure is included in Appendix B of this manual.
Design Guidelines
Pedestrian Access Routes (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide)
Minimum Design Standards ����
• Width - 4-foot minimum exclusive of curb width.
• Passing Spaces - If the walkway is less than 5 feet wide, passing spaces 5 feet x
5 feet minimum must be provided at intervals of 200 feet.
• Cross Slope - 2% maximum.
• If the walkway is contained within street or highway border its grade shall not
exceed the general grade established for the adjacent street or highway. The
walkway must be on the roadway and marked or signed as a separate space for
non-motorized travel.
• Surfaces - Firm, stable, slip resistant.
• Vertical Lips - '/4-inch to '/z-inch beveled 1:2 up to '/2-inch maximum.
• Horizontal Gaps - '/2-inch sphere cannot pass through opening.
o Advisory R301.3.1- If horizontal, must be perpendicular to path of travel.
• Horizontal Gaps at railroad tracks — 3-inch maximum.
�
� ,:e. �
� __ r' .
f, ..�
,'
,`
f
t
F
�,
f
60"wide concrete walk from the grass to the
curb/gutter
5
Curb Ramps / Blended Transitions (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide)
Curb Rarr►ps
• Cross Slope - 2% maximum.
• Width — 4-foot minimum.
• Surfaces - Firm, stable, slip resistant.
• Maximum Vertical Lips— '/4- to '/z-inch beveled 1:2 up to '/z-inch maximum.
• Maximum Horizontal Gaps — '/2-inch sphere cannot pass through opening.
• Grade Breaks - Must be perpendicular to the direction of the ramp surface.
• Street/Gutter Pan - Maximum 5°/a slope of the gutter pan/street at the foot of the
ramp.
• Clear Space - At the bottom curb face, 4 feet x 4 feet minimum within the width of
the crosswalk and wholly outside the parallel vehicle travel lane.
• Detectable Warnings - Provided where curb ramps, landings, or blended transitions
connect to a street.
Perperidicular Curb Ramps
• Must be at a right angle to the gutter.
• Running Slope - 5% minimum - 8.33% maximum, 15-foot maximum length.
• Flared Sides - 10% maximum measured parallel to the curb line.
• Cross Slope - 2% maximum, may be warped to meet the street or highway.
• Landing - minimum of 4 feet x 4 feet at the top, 2% slope (maximum) in all
directions.
Parallel Curt� R�mps `
• Have running slopes in line with the direction of sidewalk travel.
• Running Slope - 5% minimum - 8.33% maximum, 15-foot maximum length.
• Cross Slope - 2% maximum.
• Landing — 4 feet x 4 feet at the bottom, may be warped to match the street.
;� ..� ,
- :�
. . ,
. .
�:: ,
r
�.b �
��;� , _ �"� ��� - - _ -
���*��� �' �,",.
d., .� z
+ yw`. �i ^:.+}�
,. ra
��'lil'I# �r+��j� °�
- �._,. 'I � � �ti �r I f;e,��,.. .
F �` - .
���:,;a+. . - .. -
.. f.���.��.«.�-�'
�.���:c. .��,�r.v., .. ,.a�.x.::�:, b.a,�.,.M., �.w��+�e�.a `�`�
Location near Courage Center-asphalt Golden Valley road near the Fire Station
connectivity to new curb has proper cut. - measurement is noting a 48" level
Crossing needs truncated dome. landing at the top of the curb cut.
s
Detectable Warning Surfaces (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide)
l�dvrsory R221
"Advisory R221 Detectable Warning Surfaces. Detectable warning surfaces are
required where curb ramps, blended transitions, or landings provide a flush pedestrian
connection to the street. Sidewalk crossings of residential driveways should not
generally be provided with detectable warnings, since the pedestrian right-of-way
continues across most driveway aprons and overuse of detectable warning surfaces
should be avoided in the interest of inessage clarity. However, where commercial
driveways are provided with traffic control devices or otherwise are permitted to
operate like public streets, detectable warnings should be provided at the junction
between the pedestrian route and the street."
DomE; Sizc
• Base: 0.9-inch minimum - 1.4-inch maximum.
• Top diameter: 50°/a of the base minimum - 65% of the base maximum.
• Height: 0.2-inch maximum.
Dome Spacing
• 1.6-inch minimum - 2.4-inch maximum, center-to-center.
Gor�trast
• The surface shall contrast visually within the adjacent gutter, street or walk light
on dark or dark on light.
Size
• Direction of travel — 24-inch minimum.
• Full width of the curb ramp, excluding flared sides and landings, and matching
the width of the approaching sidewalk. For example a 5-foot wide sidewalk
needs a 5-foot wide ramp, with a 5-foot wide detectable warning surface.
Nate� MnDOT has standard details for detectable warning surFaces. Visit the MnDOT
website for more information: http://standardplates.dot.state.mn.us/
�� �
�
�, . ,. ; .,
� � . ..
� .
- a
F=.�"", _`
���-���, � ���� ��.��
- ��. �
���..
,�. ._-
� . _
—-_ _.--
�_.�- �""`'
�'` �� , ``�
City Hall Golden Valley Road near Fire Station -
Good placement of truncated domes Good placement of truncated domes,
measuring 24"deep, and stretching the curb cuts and pedestrian walkway area.
full width of curb cut "It is in alignment with the pedestrian
path of travel and puts pedestrians out of
the intersection when crossing."
�
Pedestrian Overpasses / Underpasses (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide)
!I pproach
Where the approach slope exceeds 5%, the approach shall be one of the following:
� Ramp with 4-foot minimum width.
• Elevator.
• Limited use/limited application elevator (LULA).
• Platform lift.
Stairs
If stairs are provided in addition to ramp, elevator, LULA or platform lift, they must
comply with R407, including:
� Uniform treads and risers.
• Risers — 4-inch minimum to 7-inch maximum. %
• Treads — 11-inch minimum. � �,, :�
• Open risers are not permitted.
• Tread Surface — 2-inch minimum width of contrasting color on the front edge of
each tread.
• Nosing - curved, '/z-inch maximum or angled.
• Handrails - required on both sides.
• Handrail height — 34 inches to 38 inches above surface.
• Handrail clearance — 38-inch minimum between handrails.
s
Accessible Pedestrian Signals (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide)
Where accessible pedestrian signals (APS) are provided at pedestrian street
crossings, they shall comply with R306. Each accessible crosswalk with pedestrian
signal indication shall include audible and vibrotactile indication of the "walk" interval.
The push button must be accessible (height / approach).
Signal Location
• 10-foot minimum from other pedestrian signals at a crossing.
• Button within reach (48-inch maximum above the ground surface).
• Provide a clear ground spaces 30 inches x 48 inches with a 2% cross slope.
l�udible Walk Indic��tor
• Signal shall be tone or speech message.
• Tone frequency, timing and volume are addressed in R306.
Push Button Locatar Tone
• 2-5 dbs above ambient noise from 3 feet away.
�
�..
�,�
0
■
�;. �
■ . ,,i�
;
`�;.
�,
;
A Y/
City Hall —example of APS unit and
signage
;�.,
s
Street Furniture (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide)
General
• Maintain a 36-inch continuous pedestrian access route around street furniture.
Drinking Fountains
• Drinking Fountains - dual height.
o Spout 1 — 36-inch maximum spout height with knee clearance.
o Spout 2 - 38 inches to 43 inches spout height.
,;�
�
Tables
• Tables - minimum 5% (minimum of one) must be accessible at each location.
Benches
• Benches - 50% minimum (minimum of one) at each location must provide a
wheelchair positioned at the end providing shoulder to shoulder seating.
• Bench design - Seat height 17 inches to 19 inches at front edge.
��, .,,
,,�
io
Trails (Outdoor Developed Areas 1017)
The accessibility guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas apply only to Federal land
management agencies. However, Golden Valley will make reasonable efforts to meet
these guidelines to the extent feasible. The guidelines for the trails are published and
considered a best practice. If full compliance with 1017 is not possible, document why
it is not possible.
General
• Passing Spaces - If the trail is less than 5 feet wide, passing spaces 5 feet x
5 feet minimum must be provided at intervals of 1,000 feet.
• Concrete, asphalt or boards - '/2-inch maximum lips/gaps.
• Horizontal Openings - 3/-inch sphere cannot pass through opening.
• Resting Intervals at least 60 inches long x 36 inches side (provided according to
Table 1017.7.1).
• Slope of resting intervals.
o Concrete, asphalt or boards -1:48 maximum. ``'�'�
o Other surfaces - 1:20 maximum.
Surfaces
� Firm/stable.
• Slip resistant.
Wid th
• Width — 36-inch minimum, may be reduced to 32 inches for a maximum
distance of 24 inches.
Slope
• Maximum 30% of the total trail length can have a slope exceeding 1:12.
• No segment of trail may be steeper than 1:8.
• Where a trail is steeper than 1:20 rest areas must be provided. The maximum
�:,,` length of a segment and spacing of the rest intervals are in Table 1017.7.1 in
the Outdoor Development Areas document.
Cross Slc�>c
• Concrete, asphalt or boards - 1:48 maximum.
• Other surfaces - 1:20 maximum.
Trail Signage
• Must be located at the trail heads.
• Length of trail or segment.
• Surface type.
• Typical and minimum width.
• Typical and maximum running slope.
11
• Typical and maximum cross slope.
Public Parking
Street Parkir�g (Draft Public Right-of-Way document)
Requirements for street parking apply only to marked or metered street parking. When
on-street parking is marked or metered, accessible parking spaces complying with
R308 shall be provided on the block perimeter in accordance with Table R216 in the
Draft Public Right-of-Way document.
Parkinq Lots (MN1341 1106.1, 502) �y�
� Parking Space Width — 8-foot minimum. ""`�'� ���
• Access Aisle Width — 8-foot minimum.
• Access Aisle Markings - striped the full length of the parking space, indicate "no
parking" (sign or painted on surFace).
• Slope- 1:48 maximum in all directions for entire space and access aisle.
• Vertical Clearance — 96-inch minimum.
• Signage
o Centered at head end of the parking space
0 96-inch maximum from head end of the space
0 60 to 66 inches above the parking surface to the bottom of the sign
Note - In Minnesota, all access aisles are 8 feet wide (no 5-foot wide aisles).
,,,���t�.
�„a,
12
Frequently Asked Questions
Sidewalks
Question: A project will be undertaken to connect a series of sidewalk segments near
a schoo/. Must the existing segments of sidewalk be modified if they do not meet width
or cross slope provisions?
Answer: Yes, to the maximum extent feasible within the scope of the project.
Agencies are not required to expand a planned scope of work to include other items of
accessibility.
Question: A new sidewalk is being built along an existing road that contains driveway
access points. Must those driveways be modified if their cross slope exceeds 2%?
Answer: Yes, to the maximum extent feasible within the scope of the project.
Quesfion: A city is rebuilding a sidewalk along Main Street. The distance between the
edge of the right-of-way and the existing road does not provide sufficient room for a
4-foot-wide pedestrian access route. Does the municipality have to acquire more right-
of-way on private property or narrow the roadway to provide the necessary space?
Answer: No, these guidelines do not require the municipality to obtain right-of-way or
to narrow roadways. A municipality may decide to do either for other reasons (for
instance, the roadway may be narrowed as a larger traffic calming effort or as part of a
larger project in the roadway).
Curb Ramps / Blended Transitions
Question: A multi-block length of roadway is being resurfaced. The corners have
curb ramps that meet some, but not all, of the current specifications; for example, the
cross slope may be too steep or the curb ramps do not have detectable warnings.
Must the curb ramps be reconstructed as part of the resurfacing project?
Answer: Yes, if it is technically feasible to provide complying features. The work
should be done at the same time the resurfacing is being done.
Question: New curb ramps are being installed at an existing developed corner. New
construction standards require the curb ramp to be within the crosswalk, but an
existing underground utility vault is located where the ramp should be. Must the utility
vault be moved?
Answer: The scope of this project will determine the answer. If utilities are being
moved for other reasons within the project limits, it may be possible to alter or relocate
the vault. If project construction will not involve the vault, it may be technically
infeasible to locate the curb ramp optimally. It may be possible to widen the crosswalk
markings to include the curb ramp.
13
Question: What if the curb ramp can be placed over the vault, but the access cover
would be located on the curb ramp?
Answer: If the access cover must be located on the curb ramp, it should meet the
surface requirements of the pedestrian access route.
Question: One corner of an intersection is being altered by curb and gutter
reconstruction and paired curb ramps are being installed as part of this project. The
other three corners of the intersection are not being altered. Must curb ramps be
provided at the unaltered corners as part of this work?
Answer: No. The scope of the project requires curb ramps only at the altered corner.
Question: Are concrete paver blocks for sidewalks acceptable for pedestrian access
routes?
Answer: Yes, but considerations should be made to ensure that the route is
comfortably and safety traversable by wheelchairs and individuals with canes or other
walk assisting devices.
Question: Are expansion joints in sidewalks compliant with accessibility guidelines?
Answer: It depends, as long as there is not a gap (where an expansion joint has worn
away) that is wider than 0.5 inches the expansion joints are okay.
Question: Where should a detectable warning device be used?
Answer: Truncated domes are required at all street crossings and discouraged at all
alley and driveway crossings. However, if the driveway access looks and operates like
a street approach, truncated domes should be considered.
Question: What is the minimum Mn/DOT width required for median refuge?
Answer: Mn/DOT is using a minimum width of 6 feet (back of curb to back of curb) for
pedestrian refuges.
Question: When is edge protection required for sidewalk runs?
Answer: Edge protection is required whenever a handrail is required. A detectable
edge is also required for sidewalks adjacent to roundabouts.
Question: When ramps are being reconstructed, does the curb need to be removed
or the ramp retrofitted to the curb?
Answer: The curb should be removed so that the new ramp meets as many
accessibility guidelines as feasible.
14
Question: If the slope exceeds 5%, how far can the walk be built before requiring a
landing?
Answer: A landing is required for every 30 inches in rise for a sidewalk that is
separated from a roadway.
Question: What does features does a compliant ramp need?
Answer: Generally speaking, a rap needs: a running slope less than or equal to
8.3%, meets MnDOT Spec. 2521.3, cross slope less than or equal to 2%, landing
slope /ess than 2% in every direction, landing area at least 4 feet by 4 feet, landing
location at the top of the ramp or at a change in the access route direction, truncated
domes covering the entire curb opening, proper drainage, no vertical discontinuities
greater than 0.25 inches.
Siqnals
Quesfion: Curb ramps are being installed at a signalized intersection as part of a
roadway improvement project. Existing pedestrian signals are pedestrian actuated but
the pushbuttons are not accessible or placed in accessible locations. Must accessib/e
pedestrian signals be installed at the existing pedestrian signals?
Answer: If work on pedestrian pushbuttons is not planned as part of this project,
there is no need to expand its scope to include APS.
Question: The pedestrian signals in a corridor are being replaced with new combined
count-down signals. Must APS be included in the new system?
Answer: Yes. The installation of a new system is an alteration that requires
compliance with the new construction guidelines to the maximum extent feasible.
However, the addition of a new feature, such as a countdown face or larger display, to
an existing installed system does not require that the scope of work be expanded to
include other features.
Question: Count-down signal displays are being added to the existing pedestrian
signal heads at an intersection, but the software and signal controller are not being
altered. Must APS be installed?
Answer: No, simply adding a display to the existing WALK/DON'T WALK signal
would not involve the system changes needed to implement APS.
Question: An intersection is being signalized and will include APS. The installation of
stub poles on the existing sidewalks to mount the new pedbuttons will not involve
disturbing the roadway or sidewalk. Must curb ramps be installed if none existed?
Answer: No. This is a project to install ped buttons; it is not an alteration to the
sidewalk or street that would require the installation of curb ramps, as required by
28 CFR 35.151(e).
15
Question: The pushbutton on an existing pedestrian signal is being replaced with a
sturdier model. Must APS be installed?
Answer: No, but the new pushbutton must meet applicable requirements (i.e.,
location, height, operable parts).
Quesfion: An intersection with sidewalks and pedestrian signals is being widened to
include a right turn lane. Must APS be installed as a consequence of the widening
project?
Answer: No, installing APS is not within scope of the project. Any new pedestrian
pushbuttons installed in the course of the work must meet applicable requirements.
Note that this project is an alteration to the street and sidewalk and thus must provide
compliant curb ramps.
�
Accessibilitv durinq construction
Quesfion: What provisions for accessibility must be made during construction
activities?
Answer: When a pedestrian access route is disrupted, closed, or relocated during
construction, maintenance work, or other temporary conditions, the alternative
pedestrian access route shall include pedestrian ramps to maintain accessibility. See
the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD) for further
guidance on the requirements for establishing an alternative pedestrian access route
for temporary traffic control. See also the "Pedestrian Accessibility Considerations in
Temporary Traffic Control Zones Check List"in the MN MUTCD.
� �� �
�.s:;:�
� �
��;::
16
References
Notice of Availability of Draft Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines
(Highlighted Notes from Original - Summary)
(Page 7) Draft Guidelines for Public Rights-of-Way
R202 Alterations and Additions to Existing Facilities. Text and advisory notes have been
added to this draft to clarify the application of new construction guidelines to an alteration
project. New work put in place within an existing developed right-of-way must comply with
these guidelines to the maximum extent feasible; see Advisory R202.3. Transitional
segments that connect undisturbed improvements with new work can facilitate compliance
(R202.1.1). Where items are places within an existing developed streetscape and the
circulation route is not altered, items required to be accessible shall be located for optimal
usability and access (R202.1.2).
(Page 13) Technical Assistance Q & A for Alterations Projects
Alterations are projects planned for implementation by a jurisdiction. Program access
obligations for existing facilities are not a part of the Board's accessibility guidelines, and the
Board's responses to the following questions do not address program access issues (see title
ll of the ADA at 28 CFR 35.149 and 35.151).
(Page 22) R202.1 General
Advisory R202.1 General. Alterations include, but are not limited to, renovation,
rehabilitation, reconstruction, historic restoration, resurfacing of circulation paths or vehicular
ways, or changes or rearrangement of structural parts or elements of a facility.
The U.S. Department of Justice Title II regulation at 28 CFR 35.151(e) requires that curb
ramps be installed whenever pedestrian walkways on sidewalks and across streets are newly
constructed or altered. A 1993 case, Kinney v. Yerusalim, 9 F.3d 1067 (3d Cir. 1993), cert.
denied, 511 U.S. 1033 (1994), held that resurfacing of a street constitutes an alteration that
requires the installation of curb ramps (for text see http://www.ada.gov/deldot.htm).
Pavement patching and liquid-applied sealing, lane restriping, and short-term maintenance
activities are not alterations.
(Page 30) R221 Detectable Warning Surfaces
Advisory R221 Detectable Warning Surfaces. Detectable warning surfaces are required
where curb ramps, blended transitions, or landings provide a flush pedestrian connection to
the street. Sidewalk crossings of residential driveways should not generally be provided with
detectable warnings, since the pedestrian right-of-way continues across most driveway
aprons and overuse of detectable warning surfaces should be avoided in the interests of
message clarity. However, where commercial driveways are provided with traffic control
devices or otherwise are permitted to operate like public streets, detectable warnings should
be provided at the junction between the pedestrian route and the street.
17
(Page 3) June 17, 2002 Release of Draft Guidelines
In fact, only future new projects would be subject to these guidelines (Accessible Pedestrian
Signals). With respect to APS in particular, only pedestrian crossings that provide pedestrian
signals would be required to include APS.
� , i1�I�po, �
4�i,�;,
��:
�
18
Special Report: Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Planning and Design for Alterations
(Highlighted Notes from Original - Summary)
Introduction
(Page 10) Alterations: Terminology
Federal highway agency nomenclature relies on new construction, reconstruction, and `3R
(resurfacing, rehabilitation, and restoration of pavements)'. Whatever term is used, the
removal of some existing improvements and installation of replacement improvements
constitutes an alteration under the ADA.
Transportation agencies may consider resurfacing a roadway a maintenance item, for ADA
purposes it has been considered an alteration with respect to the special Title ll obligation at
35.151(e) to install curb ramps.
(Page 10) Alterations: Curb Ramps
35.150(d)(2) Transition plan. If a public entity has responsibility or authority over streets,
roads, or walkways, its transition plan shall include a schedule for providing curb ramps or
other sloped areas where pedestrian walks cross curbs, giving priority to walkways serving
entities covered by the Act, including State and local government offices and facilities,
transportation, places of public accommodation, and employers, followed by walkways
serving other areas.
(Page 27) Design Process: Examples
Examples
LeYs use the classic 4Rs of highway design to illustrate how establishing the scope of work
relates to access planning (see Appendix for TxDOT's definitions). Most 4R projects involve
roadway pavement, although many other elements of construction can a/so be included:
1. Reconstruction
Reconstruction of roadway facilities is an ambitious undertaking of comprehensive scope
under which most objectives can be fully realized for both roadway and sidewalk design.
Projects of this complexity should be able to meet or exceed minimum accessibility criteria.
Example: A 1.5-mile length of residential street was reconstructed and re-aligned and water,
fire hydrant, and sanitary and storm sewers rehabilitated as part of the project. New curbs
and gutters were provided throughout. Accessibility features included new aligned curb
ramps with detectable warnings at all crossings. Sidewalks were replaced and driveway
aprons reconstructed where needed to meet cross slope limits.
(Page 27 cont.)
2. Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation projects typically raise subgrade issues. Feasibility is a factor here and `work-
arounds' will require case-by-case design solutions.
19
Example: Storm drainage improvements (new inlets) are planned for one side of an existing
developed streetscape. Sidewalk and roadway surfaces and subgrade facilities are removed
at each corner, but the sidewalks they connect to will remain. When sidewalk segments are
replaced or repaired, the new work must provide accessibility/usability. But it must also meet
the grades of existing sidewalks at the project boundary. Providing intermediate transition
segments between the new and existing work (rather than matching the old) will serve users
best. Future work then need only improve the transition segment and the existing sidewalk. In
addition, the scope of work for this alteration must include new curb ramps (and the
improvement of existing ones, as feasible). The agency should consider adding opposite-side
curb ramps to the scope of work, as well.
3. Restoration
Restoration projects return pavement structure, riding quality, or other roadway characteristic
in an existing cross-section to near-new condition. Because the work affects the usability of
the surface, it is considered an alteration and must include curb ramps at pedestrian
crossings.
Example:An existing rutted roadway surface will be restored. Subgrade structure will be
improved and a new surface added without disturbing adjacent existing sidewalks. Curb
ramps added in an alteration of this limited scope will be usable by many, but may not be
optimal in location, wayfinding, s/ope, width, or other feature until a later alteration to the
sidewalk is undertaken.
4. Resurfacing
Most resurfacing will be viewed as an alteration—a change that affects surface usability.
However, spot patching and liquid-applied seals are described as maintenance not requiring
curb ramps in DOJ technical assistance publications. FHWA guidance distinguishes between
structural and non-structural resurfacing.
,, .� .,;,. � �� �
Funding �H�;,
Resources: Planning and Funding Accessible Pedestrian Facilities Funding
Availability and Design Philosophy(Page 100-103)
The combined funding of Federal, state and local government on surface transportation is
one of this country's largest domestic spending programs. The funding for pedestrian issues
has increased dramatically since 1991. This increase was spurred by transportation
legislation, grassroots support, and accessibility policies. Pedestrian projects and programs
are eligible for funding in almost every major federal-aid surface transportation category.
Transportation legislation, including the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act:A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) calls for mainstreaming pedestrian (and
bicycle) projects into planning, design, and operation of our nation's transportation system.
Transportation facilities must include features that will allow people of all abilities to use them.
The federal-aid highway program can work hand-in-hand with the ADA of 1990, which
requires all pedestrian facilities be accessible for people with disabilities. Accessibility is not
an exclusive or separate issue.
20
Rather, accessibility design is fundamental to the walking environment because all
pedestrians with or without disabilities benefit from accessibility design. Accessibility is an
intrinsic part of planning, retrofitting, and constructing pedestrian facilities, along with safe
accommodation and good design. Accessibility is a safety issue because if a facility is not
accessible, then it is not safe for more than 54 million people in this country who have some
form of disability. The USDOT's policy on accessibility states, "Accessibility is a civil right.
The key function of transportation, at its most fundamental level, is to provide basic mobility
to society. It is our responsibility to strive to ensure that transportation systems are not only
safe and efficient, but also usable by all-including persons with disabilities." The USDOT's
Accessibility Policy Statement can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/accessibility/polfin.htm.
Accessibility requirements are not new and these obligations have been around long before
the ADA in 1990. States and localities were first required to place curb ramps at street
crossings in 1973 by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Also, the DOJ has ruled that
resurfacing a roadway (beyond filling pot holes) is an alteration, thus triggering the
requirement to place curb ramps at roadway intersections. Funding Sources for Pedestrian
Projects Pedestrian projects are broadly eligible for funding from almost all the major federal-
aid highway, transit, safety and other programs. The matrix at the end of this section denotes
the FHWA and FTA funding programs that can be used to fund pedestrian projects and
activities.
Federal-Aid Highway Programs National Highway System funds may be used to construct
pedestrian walkways and facilities on land adjacent to any highway on the National Highway
System, including Interstate highways.
Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds may be used for either the construction of
pedestrian walkways, or non-construction projects (such as maps, brochures, and public
service announcements) related to safety. TEA 21 adds "the modification of public sidewalks
to comply with the Amerrcans with Disabilities AcY'as an activity that is specifically eligible for
the use of these funds.
Ten percent of each state's annual STP funds is set-aside for Transportation Enhancement
Activities (TEAs). The law provides a specific list of activities that are eligible TEAs and this
includes "provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles, provision of safety and
educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists,"and the "preservation of abandoned
railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian and bicycle trails)."
Another 10% of each state's STP funds is set aside for the Hazard Elimination and Railway—
Highway Crossing programs, which address pedestrian safety issues. Each state is required
to imp/ement a Hazard Elimination Program to identify and correct locations that may
constitute a danger to motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Funds may be used for activities
including a survey of hazardous locations and for projects on any publicly owned, shared-use
path, pedestrian pathway or trail, or any safety-related traffic ca/ming measure.
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds may be used for either the
construction of pedestrian walkways or non-construction projects (such as maps, brochures
and public service announcements).
21
Recreational Trails Program funds may be used for all kinds of trail projects. Of the funds
apportioned to a state, 30% must be used for motorized trail uses, 30% for non-motorized
trail uses and 40% for diverse trail uses (any combination).
Provisions for pedestrians are eligible under the various categories of the Federal Lands
Highway Program in conjunction with roads, highways, and parkways. Priority for funding
projects is determined by the appropriate Federal Land Agency or Tribal government.
National Scenic Byways Program funds may be used for "construction along a scenic byway
of a facility for pedestrians."
High-Priority Projects and Designated Transportation Enhancement Activities identified by
SAFETEA-LU include numerous pedestrian, trail, and traffic calming projects in communities
throughout the country.
Safe Routes to School funds are provided to the states to substantially improve the ability of
primary and middle school students to walk and bicycle to school safely. The purposes of the
program are:
1. to enable and encourage children, including those with disabilities, to walk and bicycle to
school;
2. to make bicycling and walking to school a safer and more appealing transportation
alternative, thereby encouraging a healthy and active lifestyle from an early age; and
3. to facilitate the planning, development, and implementation of projects and activities that
will improve safety and reduce traffic, fuel consumption, and air pollution in the vicinity
(approximately 2 miles) of primary and middle schools (Grades K-8).
Each state administers its own program and develops its own procedures to solicit and select
projects for funding. The program establishes two distinct types of funding opportunities:
infrastructure projects (engineering improvements) and non-infrastructure related activities
(such as education, enforcement, and encouragement programs
Federal Transit Program
Title 49 U.S.C. (as amended by SAFETEA-LU) allows the Urbanized-Area Formula Grants,
Capital Investment Grants and Loans, and Formula Program for Other Than Urbanized Area
transit funds to be used for improving pedestrian access to transit facilities and vehicles.
Eligible activities include investments in "pedestrian and bicycle access to a mass
transportation facility"that establishes or enhances coordination between mass transportation
and other transportation. SAFETEA-LU also created a Transit Enhancement Activity program
with a one percent set-aside of Urbanized-Area Formula Grant funds designated for, among
other things, pedestrian access and walkways.
Highway Safety Programs
Pedestrian and bicyclist safety remain priority areas for State and Community Highway
Safety Grants funded by the Section 402 formula grant program. A state is eligible for these
grants by submitting a performance plan (establishing goals and performance measures for
improving highway safety) and a highway safety plan (describing activities to achieve those
goals). Research, development, demonstrations, and training to improve highway safety
22
(including pedestrian safety) is carried out under the Highway Safety Research and
Development (Section 403) program.
Matrix of FHWA and FTA Funding Opportunities for Pedestrian Facilities
SAFETEA-lU & de/Pedesvi�n fur►din 0 rtunioes
IHA STP NEP RN[ TEA (MAQ ATP FTA TE B�I 402 PU TCSP OBS FlH Bl'W
�ryde and pedesvian pbn = _ - _
� �IC ��KS lnl ��{j�f� i 11[ i[ Y i it Y i[ f[ ][ i
gved shoukltn � � x Y li Y iL f[ X
ned bikt route = x � = Y -
�1iRd-U3t �Vdl� " " '� ' " x " '
Sn k mck hike/bict trzil =
t im ovement o r�m = _ _ -
� . . ,�
8ke ncks on buses x - _ - -
8 d! �cin (acikoiES • _ _ - _ �
hiUhi hw intersetonn = x = _ _ � - -
g tk stan e/strrict ctnur Y = _ _ _ _ _
Sdewtlks,new or rettofit Y Y x ,� � � ,� . � . .
GosswaNu,roew or rtvo6t = = Y = = Y Y Y .� .
SAFETEA-lU & ck/Pedesuitn Fundin 0 nioes
IHA STP HEP AH( TEA (MAQ RTP FTA TE BAI 402 PU TCSP OBS FlH BYW
S nil im ovemenu " ' ' " : '
(Lrb tuts and rim ' ' � % � �
Trlffit plmin = '� '� - '
{oordinator sition '� � �
Sa(e /e�aaan sio�n x � Y
Pol�ia ornl = � Y
Helmet omation � � x
S�h brochurelbook � x - Y
Tr�inin Y =
�r
NNS Nitioal N�Srstem (fWQ (aa�estioa MMitintioa/Air Q,u�itr Projnm T(SP inasporutioa iad tormw�j ind STstem
STP Surita� 3rinspaution Projnm flN kbertl luds Ni�hrr�ri Pro�run Prestnitioo P�ot Projrun
NEP Huud Elimi�ttion Pro�nm 84W Sa�ac B�a�s p81 Acuu to)osslAerene tanaext Pro�rim
RN( I�i«a7•MqArny trossrq Prognm Btl Brx4�e �TP Aeanuio�al Tnis Projnm
TEA &�sponitt;on f�oaeaxn�Acivities 102 Suce s�i tam+uary kt�c S�4ry Pro�rim FU kdenl Tnmic(apipl.U�sn i I�fued►
PU SutdMetropoYtia PhiriK Fuads TE Tr�sit Ednacemeats
23
Resources
28 CFR 35
http://www2.ed.gov/po I icy/rig hts/reg/ocr/28cfr35.pdf
Accessible Rights-of-Way: A Design Guide
http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/guide/PROWGuide.htm
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)
http://www.access-board.gov/adaag/html/adaag.htm
Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (ABA)
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2007-06-20/pdf/07-2979.pdf
Hennepin County Program Access and Transition Plan
http://www.hennepin.us/
Minnesota Department of Transportation �
http.//www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/
Public Rights of Way Access Advisory Committee (PROWAAC)
http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/alterations/guide.htm
Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)
http:Uwww.access-board.gov/prowac/ /
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
http://www.access-board.gov/enforcement/rehab-act-text/intro.htm
The Access Board
http://www.access-board.gov/ ;����'
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
http://www.ada.gov/
US Department of Transportation Department
http://www.dot.gov/citizen_services/disability/disability.html
24
Appendix
� , ;,
,
,
&,.
� s�
;,
25
`�� � �
� �
� , s��,
;�.
< � �' �K
a, :
�
� �� Public Works
� c :�
��_�:-� 763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988(fax)
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
October 11, 2011
Agenda Item
3. Snow Plowing and Ice Control Policy for City Streets, Alleys, Parking Lots, Trails and
Sidewalks
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager
Charles Perkins, Street Maintenance Supervisor
Summary
In January 2009, the City adopted its Snow and Ice Control Policy for streets and a separate
policy for trails and sidewalks. This proposed revision to these documents includes the
following:
1. Combines the two documents;
2. Reflects the City's current practices and procedures; and
3. Addresses the issue of mailboxes when damaged.
The policy is based on recommendations from the League of Minnesota Cities. If Council
finds the policy acceptable, it will be placed on the November 15, 2011 Council agenda.
Attachments
Draft City of Golden Valley Snow Plowing and Ice Control Policy for City Streets, Alleys,
Parking Lots, Trails and Sidewalks (redline/strikeout version, 5 pages)
Adopted City of Golden Valley Snow Plowing and Ice Control Policy, dated January 20, 2009
(4 pages)
� �jl
��r�en � ,
Snow Plowing and Ice Control Policy
for City Streets, Alleys, Parkinq Lots, Trails and Sidewalks
January 20, 2009
Amended November 15, 2011
1. Introduction
The City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, finds that it is in the best interest of the
residents of the City to assume basic responsibility for control of snow and ice on
City streets. Reasonable ice and snow control is necessary for routine travel and
� emergency services. The City will attempt to provide snow and ice� control in a
safe and cost-effective manner, keeping in mind safety, budget, personnel, and
environmental concerns. The City will use City employees and City-owned
equipment, and private equipment when necessary. This policy does not relieve the
operator of private vehicles, pedestrians, property owners, residents and all others
� that may be using public streets, alleys, parkinq lots, sidewalks and trails, of their
responsibility to act in a reasonable, prudent and cautious manner, given the
� prevailing st�ee�-conditions.
2. Initiation of Snow and Ice Control Operations
The Public Works Maintenance Manager, or his designee, will decide when to begin
snow or ice control operations. The criteria for that decision are:
a. New accumulation of two (2) inches or more;
b. Drifting of snow that causes problems for travel;
c. Icy conditions which seriously affect travel; and
d. Time of snowfall in relationship to heavy use of streets.
I Snow and ice control operations are expensive and involve dedication of a
siqnificant amount of +"o ,��^ ^f ��m�+�,� personnel and equipment. Consequently,
snow plowing operations will not generally be conducted for snowfall of less than two
(2) inches. However, an accumulation of consecutive snowfall events of less than
two (2) inches may constitute initiation of snow plowing operations.
3. Plowing Method
Snow will be plowed in a manner so as to minimize traffic obstructions. The center of
the roadway will be plowed first. The snow shall then be pushed from left to right.
When a plow goes on a bridge, the driver shall slow down so snow does not go over
the bridge, if possible. In times of extreme snowfall, streets mav not be �e�
��immediately -cleared of snow. Plowinq �#�eSe
procedures will be adapted to address field conditions.
, ,
,
���p����o �n���i ���r�ne �rc�.+ �uill ho I�n.+�orl c�� r+� �� minimi�o
y
4. Maintenance Priorities and Schedule of Streets, Alleys, Municipal Parkinq
Lots, Sidewalks and Trails
5.A. Streets, Alleys and Municipal Parkinq Lots
The City has classified city streets based on the street function, traffic volume
and importance to the welfare of the community. Those streets classified as
minor arterials and collectors will be plowed first. These are high volume
routes, which connect major sections of the City and provide access for
emergency, fire, police and medical services. The second priority streets are
those streets providing access to schools and commercial businesses. The
third priority streets are low volume residential streets. The fourth priority
areas are alleys and City parking lots, except for those parkinq lots needed
for Public Safetv and Public Works functions.
Each year the Public Works Department prepares a map of the City showing
the City's streets svstem. m�;^+�;,,o,� �+ro�+ �.,�+o�.,. The City is divided into
routes, in which ice control and snow removal will be performed. The routes
are periodically revised to correspond to budgetary, equipment and personnel
resources. Within each route, the major streets are designated as well as
areas of steep grades (hazardous areas) that require extra care. Equipment is
assigned for the control of snow and ice.
� The start of snow and ice control operations for any storm is dependent upon
immediate and forecasted weather conditions. The most critical time periods
I are weekday mornings and evening rush hours. Collector and arterial streets
under the Citv's jurisdictional authority are the first priority. When feasible, the
City will attempt to remove snow and ice from the City's collector and arteriat
streets prior to the rush hour periods.
. Once the collector and
arterial �+er+t�-streets a�ea�are plowed and opened, the remaining streets
and cul-de-sacs in the residential, commercial and industrial areas will be
I plowed and de-iced. The qoal is to complete this work within 8 hours of the
end of the snow event.
� During significant and severe storms, the City must be prepared to move
personnel and equipment to maintain priority routes first. In fulfilling the need
to have all collector and arterial p�+e�i#�streets safe and passable, when
resources are limited, plowing of all other streets may be suspendedste�e�
at any time so resources can be shifted to the priority routes.
� Unforeseeable circumstances may cause delays in completing assigned plow
routes. Such circumstances may include weather conditions that endanger
the safety of snowplow operators and/or safe and effective operation of
equipment, commuter traffic, disabled vehicles, poor visibility conditions,
parked cars along streets, assistance to emergency response vehicles,
equipment breakdown, and personnel shortages.
B. Sidewalks and Trails
The Citv will maintain some of the sidewalks and trails in the Citv. A map of
the trails and sidewalks is prepared annually and the sidewalks and trails
have been prioritized based on function and use. As there are a limited
number of personnel available, the City will only maintain these sidewalks and
trails in accordance with qersonnel and equipment availability.
a. Priority 1 and 2 trails and sidewalks are typically plowed within 24
hours after a 2-inch snow event occurs, if resources allow.
b. The Citv mav plow onlv Priority 1 trails if a snow event occurs with
excessive accumulation (qreater than 2 inches), in the event of an ice
storm, or if equipment or manpower issues require an adjustment in
the City's schedule.
c. Prioritv 3 trails are plowed only after the maintenance effort for
Priority 1 and 2 trails has been completed. This mav tvpically be 48 to
72 hours after a 2-inch snow event. The trails mav not be completed
if consecutive snow events occur, or if manpower or equipment
issues do not allow for plowinq.
5. Haulinq Snow from Riahts-of-Wav
The Public Works Maintenance Manaqer, or desiqnee, will determine if and when
snow will be removed from Citv-owned parkinq lots and riqhts-of-way. Such snow
removal will occur in areas where there is room on the boulevard for snow storaqe
and in areas where accumulated piles of snow create a hazardous condition. Snow
removal operations will not commence until other snow plowinq operations have
been completed. Snow removal operations mav also be delayed dependinq on
weather conditions, personnel and budqet availability. The snow will be removed
and hauled to a snow storaqe area. The snow storaqe area will be located so as to
minimize environmental impacts.
6. Work Schedule for Snowplow Operators
In severe snow emergencies, operators may have to work in excess of 12-hour
shifts. Operators are allowed a 10-minute break every 2 hours with a 20-minute meal
break after 4 hours. Except for special emergency situations, the operators will be
replaced after a 12-hour shift if additional qualified personnel are available. Ideally,
snow removal operations should be conducted during early morning hours to avoid
interfering with traffic, and allow property owners the time to clear their driveway
� approaches before travelinq �ea�+r�gto work.
7. Traffic Regulations
The City recognizes that snowplow operators are exempt from traffic regulations set
forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 169, while actually engaged in work on streets,
except for regulations related to driving while impaired and the safety of school
children. Pursuant to this authority, snowplow operators engaged in snow removal or
ice control on City streets have discretion to disregard traffic laws set forth in
Chapter 169, except for laws relating to impaired driving and school children safety,
when in their judgment, it is safe to disregard such laws. The privileges granted
herein to operators of snow removal and ice control vehicles shall apply only if the
vehicle is equipped with one lighted lamp displaying a flashing, oscillating, or rotating
amber light placed in such a position on the vehicle as to be visible throughout an
arc of 360 degrees.
8. Weather Conditions
Snow and ice control operations will be conducted only when weather conditions do
not endanger the safety of snowplow operators and equipment. Factors that may
delay snow and ice control operations include: severe cold, significant winds, and
limited visibility.
9. Use of Sand, Salt, and Other Chemicals
The City will use sand, salt, and other chemicals when there are hazardous ice or
slippery conditions. The City is concerned about the effect of such chemicals on the
environment and will limit its use for that reason. With the exception of Winnetka
Avenue, south of TH 55, the City of Golden Valley does not strive to achieve bare
pavement. Sand, salt, and other chemicals are not placed on City trails and
sidewalks, except for those which immediately service a City building that is
programmed for use during the winter.
. c-s
,
��
1�!.10. Mailboxes
jMailboxes, which are enerall an obstruction in
City's riqht-of-way, are sometimes impacted bv snow removal operations. +s�-a
. The City will
conduct a review of each mailbox incident to determine whether a snowplow came
into direct contact with the mailbox or support structure. The City will only repair
mailboxes actuallv hit bv a snowplow and installed to United States Postal Service
Residential Mailbox Standards (see detail below). The City will not be responsible for
damage to mailboxes or support posts caused bv snow or ice cominq into contact
with the mailbox.
Based on the Citv's review, the City will repair the mailbox to an operational state, or
if the mailbox is unable to be adequately repaired, the City will replace e�e�e
roimh��rc�omor�} {�r the mailbox with a standard size, non-decorative metal mailbox.
The City may also replace the support post as necessary with a 4" x 4", decav
resistance wood support post, if necessarv. Dents, scratches, or other superficial
damaqe that does not prohibit normal use of the mailbox will be considered normal
wear and tear and will not be repaired or replaced bv the City. ces
,
. ,
,
„ „
, ,
NOTE:
BOTTOM OF MAIIBOX SHOULD BE 47-45 INCHES �
ABOVE ROAD 3URFACE.FACE OF MAILBOX
3HOULD BE BETWEEN 8 AND B INCHES FROM FACE , I'� 8'TO FROM
OF CURB. � FACE CURB
ROAD SURFACE �
� 12.1.1. Complaint Procedure
Complaints will be recorded on telephone logs. Calls requiring service will be
transferred to a work request and forwarded to the appropriate supervisor for
scheduling. Emergency complaints will be handled in an expeditious manner as
resources are available.
. ,
� ?^.12._Suspension of Snow Removal OperationsNVeather Conditions
The Public Works Director, or designee, may suspend plowing operations.
Generally, suspension of plowing operations will be considered only when weather
conditions endanger the safety of City staff and equipment. Factors that may
suspend snow and ice control operations include: severe cold, significant winds and
limited visibility, or the weather forecast calls for temperatures of 40 degrees within
12 hours.
�,v� /�
4 -
\ �� . ��....
�\ .
Snow Plowing and Ice Control Policy
January 20, 2009
1. Introduction
The City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, finds that it is in the best interest of the
residents of the City to assume basic responsibility for control of snow and ice on
City streets. Reasonable ice and snow control is necessary for routine travel and
emergency services. The City will attempt to provide such control in a safe and cost-
effective manner, keeping in mind safety, budget, personnel, and environmental
concerns. The City will use City employees and equipment. This policy does not
relieve the operator of private vehicles, pedestrians, property owners, residents and
all others that may be using public streets, of their responsibility to act in a
reasonable, prudent and cautious manner, given the prevailing street conditions.
2. Initiation of Snow and Ice Control Operations
The Public Works Maintenance Manager, or his designee, will decide when to begin
snow or ice control operations. The criteria for that decision are:
a. New accumulation of finro (2) inches or more;
b. Drifting of snow that causes problems for travel;
c. Icy conditions which seriously affect travel; and
d. Time of snowfall in relationship to heavy use of streets.
Snow and ice control operations are expensive and involve the use of limited
personnel and equipment. Consequently, snow plowing operations will not generally
be conducted for snowfall of less than two (2) inches. However, an accumulation of
consecutive snowfall events of less than two (2) inches may constitute initiation of
snow plowing operations.
3. Plowing Method
Snow will be plowed in a manner so as to minimize traffic obstructions. The center of
the roadway will be plowed first. The snow shall then be pushed from left to right.
When a plow goes on a bridge, the driver shall slow down so snow does not go over
the bridge, if possible. In times of extreme snowfall, streets will not always
immediately be able to be completely cleared of snow. These procedures will be
adapted to address field conditions.
1
4. Snow Removal
The Public Works Maintenance Manager, or designee, will determine if and when
snow will be removed from the area by truck. Such snow removal will occur in areas
where there is no room on the boulevard for snow storage and in areas where
accumulated piles of snow create a hazardous condition. Snow removal operations
will not commence until other snow plowing operations have been completed. Snow
removal operations may also be delayed depending on weather conditions,
personnel and budget availability. The snow will be removed and hauled to a snow
storage area. The snow storage area will be located so as to minimize
environmental impact.
5. Priorities and Schedule of Streets to be Plowed
The City has classified city streets based on the street function, traffic volume and
importance to the welfare of the community. Those streets classified as minor
arterials and collectors will be plowed first. These are high volume routes, which
connect major sections of the City and provide access for emergency, fire, police
and medical services. The second priority streets are those streets providing access
to schools and commercial businesses. The third priority streets are low volume
residential streets. The fourth priority areas are alleys and City parking lots.
Each year the Public Works Department prepares a map of the City showing the City
maintained street system. The City is divided into routes, in which ice control and
snow removal will be performed. The routes are periodically revised to correspond to
budgetary, equipment and personnel resources. Within each route, the major streets
are designated as well as areas of steep grades (hazardous areas)that require extra
care. Equipment is assigned for the control of snow and ice.
The start of snow and ice control operations for any storm is dependent upon
immediate and forecasted weather conditions. The most critical time periods are
weekday mornings and evening rush hours. When feasible, the City will attempt to
remove snow and ice from the City's collector and arterial streets prior to the rush
hour periods. Collector and arterial streets under the City's jurisdictional authority are
the first priority. �nce the priority areas are plowed and opened, the remaining
streets and cul-de-sacs in the residential, commercial and industrial areas will be
plowed and de-iced.
During significant and severe storms, the City must be prepared to move personnel
and equipment to maintain priority routes first. In fulfilling the need to have all priority
streets safe and passable, when resources are limited, plowing of all other streets
may be stopped at any time so resources can be shifted to priority routes.
2
Unforeseeable circumstances may cause delays in completing assigned plow
routes. Such circumstances may include weather conditions that endanger the
safety of snowplow operators and/or safe and effective operation of equipment,
commuter traffic, disabled vehicles, poor visibility conditions, parked cars along
streets, assistance to emergency response vehicles, equipment breakdown, and
personnel shortages.
6. Work Schedule for Snowplow Operators
In severe snow emergencies, operators may have to work in excess of 12-hour
shifts. Operators are allowed a 10-minute break every 2 hours with a 20-minute meal
break after 4 hours. Except for special emergency situations, the operators will be
replaced after a 12-hour shift if additional qualified personnel are available. Ideally,
snow removal operations should be conducted during early morning hours to avoid
interFering with trafFic, and allow property owners the time to clear their driveway
approaches before heading to work.
7. Traffic Regulations
The City recognizes that snowplow operators are exempt from traffic regulations set
forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 169, while actually engaged in work on streets,
except for regulations related to driving while impaired and the safety of school
children. Pursuant to this authority, snowplow operators engaged in snow removal or
ice control on City streets have discretion to disregard traffic laws set forth in
Chapter 169, except for laws relating to impaired driving and school children safety,
when in their judgment, it is safe to disregard such laws. The privileges granted
herein to operators of snow removal and ice control vehicles shall apply only if the
vehicle is equipped with one lighted lamp displaying a flashing, oscillating, or rotating
amber light placed in such a position on the vehicle as to be visible throughout an
arc of 360 degrees.
8. Weather Conditions
Snow and ice control operations will be conducted only_when weather conditions do
not endanger the safety of snowplow operators and equipment. Factors that may
delay snow and ice control operations include: severe cold, significant winds, and
limited visibility.
9. Use of Sand, Salt, and Other Chemicals
The City will use sand, salt, and other chemicals when there are hazardous ice or
slippery conditions. The City is concerned about the effect of such chemicals on the
environment and will limit its use for that reason. With the exception of Winnetka
Avenue, south of TH 55, the City of Golden Valley does not strive to achieve bare
pavement. Sand, salt, and other chemicals are not placed on City trails and
sidewalks, except for those which immediately service a City building that is
programmed for use during the winter.
3
10.Sidewalks
The City will maintain some of the sidewalks and trails in the City. A map of the trails
and sidewalks is prepared annually. As there are a limited number of personnel
available, the City will only maintain these sidewalks after the streets have been
p�owed.
11.Mailboxes
Coming into contact with a mailbox is a common obstacle snowplow operators face
during storm activities. The City will conduct a review of each mailbox incident to
determine whether the City will replace or provide reimbursement for the mailbox.
Only mailboxes actually hit by a snowplow will be the responsibility of the City. The
City will not be responsible for damage to mailboxes or support posts caused by
snow or ice coming into contact with the mailbox. At the mailbox owner's request,
the City will replace the mailbox with a standard size, non-decorative metal mailbox
and replace the support post as necessary with a 4" x 4", decay resistance wood
support post, both installed by the City.
12.Complaint Procedure
Complaints will be recorded on telephone logs. Calls requiring service will be
transferred to a work request and forwarded to the appropriate supervisor for
scheduling. Emergency complaints will be handled in an expeditious manner as
resources are available.
13.Completion Goals
It is the Public Works Department goal to have all streets and cul-de-sacs plowed
within eight hours of the end of the snow event. Trails and sidewalks are cleared in
priority order: priority ones the first day, priority twos the second day and priority
threes by the third day. City-owned parking lots should be cleared prior to regular
business hours.
�14.Suspension of Snow Removal OperationsNVeather Conditions
The Public Works Director, or designee, may suspend plowing operations.
Generally, suspension of plowing operations will be considered only when weather
conditions endanger the safety of City staff and equipment. Factors that may
suspend snow and ice control operations include: severe cold, significant winds and
limited visibility, or the weather forecast calls for temperatures of 40 degrees within
12 hours.
4
����� � ^'��i ii��i �5�.
F4�
��
�� ` ����� �°��� � �� � Public Works
o �, � � e
���_����� 763-593-8030 l 763-593-3988(fax)
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
October 11, 2011
Agenda Item
4. Douglas Drive Project Update
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator
Summary
At the January 5, 2010 City Council meeting, the Council formally authorized the Mayor to
request that the Douglas Drive Project (TH 55 to Medicine Lake Road) be placed in the
Hennepin County Capital Improvement Plan for right-of-way acquisition in 2015 and
construction in 2016. The estimated concept level cost of the project is approximately
$20 million, and the City's portion will be about one-half of the project costs. A new cost
estimate will be prepared at the completion of the preliminary design phase.
Background
Since January 2010, the following activities have occurred:
1. The City received notice from Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) of an award in
the amount $1,050,000. The City is utilizing these funds for the preparation of
preliminary design and early right-of-way acquisition.
2. In November 2010, the City Council authorized a contract with WSB &Associates, Inc.
to prepare the preliminary design and develop the necessary environmental
documents. In order to complete the environmental documents, a Cultural
Resources/Architectural History Investigation will be perFormed by Summit
Envirosolutions, MnDOT's authorized vendor. The cost to perform the investigation is
up to $31,137.57 for both Phase I and II portions of the investigation. The City's share
will be approximately 20% of the actual total cost or$6,228. The final cost will depend
on results of the Phase I portion with the remainder paid by MnDOT.
3. In early 2011, Xcel Energy began collection of the franchise fee ordered by the City
Council which will assist in paying for the City's portion of the project.
4. At the Council/Manager meeting on July 12, 2011, the design consultant presented the
project layout to the Council for a preliminary review. Based upon the City Council
consensus, the design was forwarded on to the TLC and Hennepin County, both of
whom have approved the project in concept.
5. On September 22, 2011, City staff met with property owners whose property will be
impacted by the project to the extent that the property needs to be taken in total.
6. In late September 2011, the City purchased one home that was available and had
been identified as a total take.
7. On October 5, 2011, an open house was held to review the project with the corridor
property owners.
Next Steps
1. At the October 11, 2011 Council/Manager meeting, staff will update the Council on the
status of the Douglas Drive project prior to officially presenting the preferred layout to
the Council at its November 15, 2011 regular meeting for authorization of Municipal
Consent. Once Municipal Consent is attained, the environmental documents can be
submitted to MnDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for their
approval and release of the remaining funding available from the TLC grant. That
funding is expected to be utilized to acquire necessary right-of-way along the corridor
that is critical for the advancement of the project. The remainder of the acquisitions will
be made as funding is available through the Xcel franchise agreement funds and other
sources.
2. Xcel is in the process of preparing a preliminary design for the relocation of overhead
utilities underground.
3. The City will be entering into an agreement with Hennepin County regarding right-of-
way acquisition and other project management issues.
:G' - �
'.O� \`\ r`"'�a...
4
:1 l� �1
- �/ P Finance
0 '�f ;�� W V 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fau)
�
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
October 11, 2011
Agenda Item
5. 2012-2013 Proposed Budget- Other Funds
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
At the Council/Manager meeting, the Council will be reviewing the following funds:
• Water and Sewer Utility Fund (Enterprise)
• Storm Sewer Utilifiy Fund (Enterprise)
• Vehicle Maintenance Fund (Internal Service Fund)
Appropriate staff will be in attendance to discuss the proposed budgets for these divisions
and answer questions from the Council.
Attachments
2012-2013 Water and Sewer Utility Proposed Budget (39 pages)
2012-2013 Storm Sewer Utility Fund Proposed Budget (42 pages)
2012-2013 Vehicle Maintenance Proposed Budget (15 pages)
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
DIVISION: Utility Malntenance(082)
2012% 2013%
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 OVER 2011 OVER 2012
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT ADOPTED PROPOSED
Personal Services
6110 Salaries-Regular Employees $537,774 $548,742 $581,160 $603,220 $581,160 $623,600 $623,600
6111 Overtime-Regular Employees 18,226 19,377 18,000 21,500 18,000 23,000 23,000
6130 Salaries-Temporary Employees 27,171 33,074 36,250 36,250 36,250 36,250 36,250
6150 Employee Insurance 98,831 129,924 130,500 150,810 130,500 157,940 157,940
6160 Retirement 73,283 77,452 99,305 86,450 99,305 90,450 90,450
TOTAL Personal Services 755,285 808,569 865,215 898,230 865,215 931,240 931,240 7.63% 0.00%
Supplies and Services
6320 Operating Supplies 143,583 212,234 175,950 192,950 175,950 176,250 158,800 0.17% -9.90%
6324 Clothing 6,355 6,266 6,500 6,500 6,500 7,100 7,100 9.23% 0.00%
6331 EquipmentParts 3,586 3,943 15,250 16,750 14,250 16,750 14,750 9.84% -11.94%
6340 Professional Services 190,292 106,504 147,200 148,150 147,200 143,695 144,180 -2.38% 0.34%
6343 Telephone 6,467 5,845 9,680 9,680 9,680 9,750 9,750 0.72% 0.00%
6371 EledricService-NSP 2,151 2,123 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 0.00% 0.00%
6411 Conferences and Schools 13,752 7,164 13,550 13,550 13,550 15,245 13,245 12.51% -13.12%
6413 DuesandSubscriptions 1,423 1,148 1,530 1,525 1,530 1,580 1,580 3.27% 0.00%
6440 OtherContractualService 1,872,323 2,006,921 2,279,190 2,281,640 2,490,890 2,605,420 2,605,420 14.31% 0.00%
6840 MerchandiseforResale 2,754,535 2,130,612 2,731,000 2,890,465 2,841,000 2,764,180 2,889,190 1.21% 4.52%
TOTAL Supplies and Services 4,994,467 4,482,760 5,382,450 5,563,810 5,703,150 5,742,570 5,846,615 6.69% 1.81%
Vehicle Maintenance Charaes
7401 MaintenanceCharges-Labor 47,637 40,108 40,000 40,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 2.50% 0.00%
7402 MaintenanceCharges-Parts 39,535 31,270 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 0.00% 0.00%
7403 Motor Fuels 27,143 34,346 32,000 32,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 3.13% 0.00%
TOTAL Vehicle Maintenance Chgs 114,315 105,724 112,000 112,000 114,000 114,000 114,000 1.79% 0.00%
Capital Outlav
6960 CapitalOutlay 1,421,549 663,704 2,242,000 2,264,320 732,000 1,391,000 1,485,000 -37.96% 6.76%
TOTALCapitalOutlay 1,421,549 663,704 2,242,000 2,264,320 732,000 1,391,000 1,485,000 -37.96°/ 6.76°/
Transfers
7110 Permanent Transfer-Reserve Fund - - - - - - -
7220 Overhead Transfer-General Fund 275,000 275,000 290,000 275,000 305,000 275,000 275,000 -5.17% 0.00%
TOTALTransfers 275,000 275,000 290,000 275,000 305,000 275,000 275,000 -5.17°/ 0.00%
TOTALS $7,560,616 $6,335,757 $8,891,665 $9,113,360 $7,719,365 $8,453,810 $8,651,855 -4.92°/ 2.34%
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2072-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
DIVISION: Utility Maintenance(082) PROGRAM: Administration(7121)
2012% 2013%
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 OVER 2011 OVER 2012
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT ADOPTED PROPOSED
Supplies and Services
6320 Operaling Supplies $21,385 $30,103 $25,700 $25,700 $25,700 $27,300 $29,300 6.23% 7.33%
6324 Clothing 6,355 6,266 6,500 6,500 6,500 7,100 7,100 9.23% 0.00%
6331 EquipmentParts 3,586 3,943 15,250 16,750 14,250 16,750 14,750 9.84% -11.94%
6340 ProfessionalServices 89,067 26,812 29,200 30,150 29,200 25,195 25,680 -13.72% 1.92%
6343 Telephone 4,637 4,280 7,680 7,680 7,680 9,250 9,250 20.44% 0.00%
6411 Conferences and Schools 13,752 7,164 13,550 13,550 13,550 15,245 13,245 12.51% -13.12%
6413 DuesandSubscriptions 1,423 1,148 1,530 1,525 1,530 1,580 1,580 3.27% 0.00%
6440 OtherConlractualServices 1,222 620 1,200 1,200 1,200 6,200 6,200 416.67% 0.00%
6840 MerchandiseforResale 4,304 18,766 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL Supplies and Services 145,731 99,102 125,610 128,055 124,610 133,620 132,105 6.38% -1.13%
Vehicle Mainlenance Charaes
7401 MaintenanceCharges-Labor 47,637 40,108 40,000 40,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 2.50% 0.00%
7402 MaintenanceCharges-Parts 39,535 31,270 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 0.00% 0.00%
7403 Motor Fuels 27,143 34,346 32,000 32,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 3.13% 0.00%
TOTAL Vehicle Maintenance Chgs 114,315 105,724 112,000 112,000 114,000 114,000 114,000 1.79% 0.00%
Caaital Outlav
6960 CapitalOutlay 1,421,549 663,704 2,242,000 2,264,320 732,000 1,391,000 1,485,000 -37.96% 6.76%
TOTALCapitalOutlay 1,421,549 663,704 2,242,000 2,264,320 732,000 1,391,000 1,485,000 -37.96% 6.76%
Transfers
7220 Overhead Transfer-General Fund 275,000 275,000 290,000 275,000 305,000 275,000 275,000 -5.17% 0.00%
TOTAL Transfers 275,000 275,000 290,000 275,000 305,000 275,000 275,000 -5.17% 0.00%
TOTALS $1,956,595 $1,143,530 $2,769,610 $2,779,375 $1,275,610 $1,913,620 $2,006,105 30.91% 4.83%
Administration- Utilities Program 7121
6320-Operating Supplies
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Sho Su lies&E ui ment 1,638 6,201 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 4,000
Tools 2,263 2,080 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 2,000
Paint&Su lies 690 100 800 800 800 800 800
Safet E ui ment 3,094 1,242 2,500 1,700 2,500 2,500 3,000
Re lacement Parts 5,711 3,350 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000
Re air Materials 4,355 4,496 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100
Markin PainUlocate 1,770 900 1,000 1,000
Office Furniture 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Metal Locator 1,006 2,254 1,500 1,600 1,500 1,500 1,500
Office Su lies 730 1,680 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
Cement Mixer 3,000
Generator 3,130
Printer 1,131
Meters for City Buildings
2009 Moved to 6340
Water Qualit Re ort 767 800 800 800 800
Re lacement of Com uters 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
S ecial Assessment Char es(Henn Ct 600 600 600 600
$21,385 $30,103 $25,700 $25,700 $25,700 $27,300 $29,300
Administration- Utilities Program 7121
6324-Clothing
2009 2010 2011 2071 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Uniforms for Crew 3,200 3,290 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,900 3,900
Safet Shoe Reimbursement
10 em lo ees$150/calendar ear/ erson 1,437 1,457 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
Safet Clothin
Rain Suits,Vests, Hard Hats Rubber Glove 1,718 1,519 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,700 1,700
$6,355 $6,266 $6,500 $6,500 $6,500 $7,100 $7,100
Administration- Utilities Program 7121
6331-Equipment Parts
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Hose for Sewer Jet 3,586 4,000 3,800 4,000 4,000 4,000
Nozzle for Sewer Jet 2,000 4,500 2,000 3,000 3,000
Grease Release 1,400 2,900 1,400 2,900 2,900
2 Broom Heads sidewalk machines 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350
Misc Su lies 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Manhole Blowers 2 1,000 1,000
Confined S ace Ent Tri od 3,000 3,000
Confined S ace Ent Monitors/Software 1,500 1,500 1,500
3"Trash Pum 4,500 3,200
Mixer 2,340
Generator 1,603
$3,586 $3,943 $15,250 $16,750 $14,250 $16,750 $14,750
Administration-Utilities Program 7121
6340-Professional Services
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Go her One Call 4,864 6,029 6,000 7,000 6,000 7,000 7,000
Water Qualit Re ort 800 555 800 600 700
Hi hwa Technolo ies 500 500 500 500 500
AGT International electronic o her locates 1,224 1,224 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400
Plumbin at Cit facilities
Meter U rades Moved from 6320) 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000
Misc. Printin 620 620 620 620 620
800 Mhz. Radio Maint. 16 Radios 2,880 2,352 2,880 3,075 2,880 3,075 3,460
Tree Trust Reservoir Wall 9,109
MCES Foundation Grant Pro ram 70,990 15,658
revenue to offset ex ense)
Carte ra h Technical Su ort 1,549 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000
$89,067 $26,812 $29,200 $30,150 $29,200 $25,195 $25,680
Administration- Utilities Program 7121
6343-Telephone
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Cell Phone Usa e for De artment 2,762 2,505 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800
Ceil Phone Re lacement/Parts 100 100 100 100 100
Com uter Wireless Modem 1,875 1,775 3,060 3,060 3,060 4,650 4,650
6 X$42.5/month X 12 months
Net Motion for 2 La To s 2 X$200 1,000 1,000 1,000 600 600
Two more in 2010
GPS Cell Phone $90/month X 12 months 720 720 720 1,100 1,100
$4,637 $4,280 $7,680 $7,680 $7,680 $9,250 $9,250
Administration -Utilities Program 7121
6411-Conferences&Schools
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Concept Proposed Conce t
AWWA National Conference 2,000
Suburban Utilit All Utilities Sta 90 180 200 200 200 200 200
MN De t of Health water school 3 da 1,120 1,162 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
Five Utilities Staff
MN Pollution Control sewer school 3 da 568 560 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
Six Utilities Staff
MN Rural Water Association
One Da &Annual Conference 1,275 1,325 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
MN Wastewater O erators Conference Lemke 517 140 800 800 800 800 800
MN AWWA Section Conference 1,500 1,149 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600
Trac , Lemke
Public Works Leadershi Academ Lemke 1,300
Misc Trainin O ortunities(All Utilities Sta 5,494 4,900 4,305 4,900 4,000 4,000
Safet Trainin All Utilities Sta 1,387 1,485 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700
Trainin Materials All Utilities Sta 42 500 500 500 500 500
Audio Metric Onsite Testin 162 168 250 250 250 250 250
CPR Trainin 297
Defensive Snow Plaw Trainin 400
Utilit Mana ement Institute 595 595 595 595
$13,752 $7,164 $13,550 $13,550 $13,550 $15,245 $13,245
Administration-Utilities Program 7121
6413-Dues,Subscriptions and Certifications
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
MN Wastewater O erator Dues (Trac , Lemke 140 200 50 55 50 50 50
AWWA Membershi Trac , Lemke 557 310 600 590 600 600 600
APWA Membershi Trac , Lemke 283 205 290 290 290 290 290
Certification Costs All Utilities Sta 20 100 100 100 100 100
SUSA Membershi Trac , Lemke 200 200 250 200 250 250 250
MN Rural Water Membershi (Cit , Lemke 200 188 200 200 200 200 200
Boiler License Renewal McCall) 23 45 40 90 40 90 90
$1,423 $1,148 $1,530 $1,525 $1,530 $1,580 $1,580
Administration-Utilities Program 7121
6440-Other Contractual Services
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Miscellaneous Contractual Fees 1,222 620 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
Clean Fill Dis osal 5,000 5,000
$1,222 $620 $1,200 $1,200 $1,200 $6,200 $6,200
Administration -Utilities Program 7121
6840-Merchandise for Resale
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Radio Read Meters and Parts 4,304 18,766 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
$4,304 $18,766 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
Administration-Utilities Program 7121
6960 Capital Outlay
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Conce t
Utilit Buildin Re airs
Air Com ressor 185CFM Unit 637 W&SS-01 15,011
Utilit Truck, Unit 669 W&SS-020 30,684
Portable Generator W&SS-041 23,409
GPS Unit 8,712
Utilities Tractor W&SS-031 Moved From 2010 108,402
San Swr&Wtr Line Re air/Reconst 987,184 275,718 1,000,000 1,000,000 400,000 400,000 1,100,000
I&I Surchar e Pro ram 216,304 185,316 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
Sewer Debris Collector 5,419
Door Re lacement 8,800
H dralic Breaker 5,268
Utilit Buildin Roof Re lace-Wold Priorit #1 21,068
Portable Generator
SCADA Connection on All Lift Stations 26,858
Dum Truck W&SS-017 64,677
Picku Truck W&SS-019 25,970
Water Main Re lacement-Boone Ave 88,089
Sidewalk Swee er W&SS-034 10,056
Mill and Overla Outdoor Stora e Area W&SS-046 50,000 50,000
Utilit Buildin Re airs W&SS-045
Vactor Truck W&SS-033 390,000 390,000
Trailer Mounted Welder W&SS-049 20,000 7,337
H dralic Dewaterin Pum W&SS-055 20,000 30,940
Water Main Rehabilitaion-Le end Dr 540,000 470,000
-Bru nswick 70,000
Structure and Pi e Ins ection Pole Camera 22,000 19,185
Trailer 12,000 12,000
Air Com ressor Mounted on Trailer 35,000 25,000
Picku Truck 35,000 45,000
Utilit Buildin Floorin U rade 50,000 50,000
Guide Rail S stem 5,166
Er onomic Work Stations 20,000
Meter Readin S stem U rade 100,000 100,000
Sidewalk Swee er W&SS-044 15,000
Picku Truck 85,000
Harold Ave Reconstruction 500,000
Sewer Televisin E ui ment 24,000
1,421,549 663,704 2,242,000 2,264,320 732,000 1,391,000 1,485,000
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Plan
Data in Year 2012 and 2013
PROJECTS BY YEAR
Project Name Department Project# Priority Project Cost
, 20�
Sanitary Sewer&Water Line RepaidRecon. Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-001 nla 400,000
inflow/Infiltration Study and Improvements Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-002 n/a 200,000
Utility Building Flooring UpgradelReplacement Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-032 nla 50,000
Pickup/Utility Truck Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-035 nla 45,000
Sidewalk Sweeper Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-044 nla 15,000
Air Compressor Mounted on Trailer Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-047 nla 25,000
Televising Equipment Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-053 nla 24,000
Trailer Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-054 nla 12,000
Harold and Rhode Island Reconstruction Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-057 nla 500,000
Work Stations Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-059 n/a 20,000
Radio Meter Reading System Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-063 n/a 100,000
Totai for 2012 1,391,000
2013
Sanitary Sewer&Water Line RepaidRecon. Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-001 n/a 1,100,000
Inflowllnfiltration Study and Improvements Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-002 n/a 200,000
Pickup Truck Water&Sewer Systems W&SS-062 n/a 85,000
Radio Meter Reading System Water 8 Sewer Systems W&SS-063 n/a 100,000
Total for 2013 1,485,000
GRAND TOTAL 2,876,000
Page 1
Project# WcXLSS-OO1 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name Sanitary Sewer& Water Line Repair/Recon. Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
i Description
Major repairs and reconstruction on the Ciry's sanitary sewer and water systems as needed. Repairs will be done in conjunction with the City's Pavement I
Management Program(See S#1). i
Justification
To maintain City's water mains and sanitary sewer mains. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 400,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 4,800,000
Total 400,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 4,800,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 400,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 4,800,000
Total 400,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 4,800,000
I Project# w&SS-��2 ' Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name Inflow/Infiltration Study and Improvements Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description !
IResults of an enginnering study in 2005 and 2006 identified the sources of clear water inflow and infiltration(1&1)into the cities and the Metropolitan Council I
'Environmental Services(MCES)sanitary sewer systems.Beginning in 2006,the sources identified in the study will be addressed. J
Justification '
Consistent with the MCES requirements that the City's 1&I problems must be addressed to avoid the surcharge and pending demand charge from the MCES.In
2013,unaddressed flows were to built into the rates from MCES but will now be used for rehabilia[ion of the system. I
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000
Total 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000
Total 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 7,000,000
Page 1
I Project# w&SS-032 i Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
I Project Name Utility Building Flooring Upgrade/Reptacement I TyPe Unassigned
Llseful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
� Description �
___ _
Utility Building tile flooring in the main roll call room,restroom,offices,kitchen,steps and entry. J
I Justification
'Utility Building flooring withstands heavy abuse from employee tracking and has exceeded its life cycle. 1
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 50,000 50,000
Total 50,000 50,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 50,000 50,000
Total 50,000 50,000
Department Water&Sewer Systems
Project# w&LSS-�35
Contact
Project Name p�cku /Utili Truck
j� �' Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description
IPickup/Utility truck for the Utility DepaRment to replace Unit#673,a 2002 Ford F-150 pickup. �
--- ____---- --
� Justification
Increased repair and maintenance on Unit#673,which will be ten years old. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 45,000 45,000
Total 45,000 45,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 45,000 45,000
Total 45,000 45,000
Page 2
i Project# WBiSS-O44 Department Water&Sewer Systems
i� Contact
, rro�ecc Name Sidewalk Sweeper I Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description
_- - _ __
�Gravely side�valk sweeper for complex snow removal and various sweeping duties. _ _�
� Justification '
- ----__ --- ----_ ---------- �
Ilncreased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 663,a 1998 Gravely sidewalk machine.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 15,000 15,000
TOt81 15,000 15,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 15,000 15,000
Total 15,000 15,000
� Project# w&SS-04'] '�� Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name Air Compressor Mounted on Trailer Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
� Description
IAir compressor on trailer to replace Unit 662, 1997 Ingersol Rand. �
Justification ',
ilncrease repair and maintenance expenditures on Uni[662,which will be 15 years old. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 25,000 25,000
TOtal 25,000 25,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water 8�Sewer Utility Fund 25,000 25,000
TOt81 25,000 25,000
Page 3
�, Project# w&SS-�53 Department Water&Sewer Systems
' Contact
'I Project Name Televising Equipment Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
IDescription
Sewer televising camera and transporter for televising sewer mainlines.Main Line Televising equipment to replace equipment purchased with truck#680.The
equipment will be four years old and the computer software will be not compatible.
� Justification '
IiThe equipment will be four years old and the computer software will be outdated.In 2016,all equipment will need to be replaced.. I
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 24,000 50,000 74,000
Total 24,000 50,000 74,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water 8�Sewer Utility Fund 24,000 50,000 74,000
Total 2a,o0o 50,000 7a,000
Department Water&Sewer Systems
� Project# w&SS-054 �
Contact
Project Name Trailer
Type Equipment
llseful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
IDescription '
_ __- _�
Trailer to haul trench box for water main breaks.This is one of two trailers. __ _
Justification
'This would replace Unit#652 that will be 21 years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Furnishings 12,000 12,000
Total 12,000 12,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 12,000 12,000
Total 12,000 72,000
Page 4
Project# wa�ss-�57 I Department Water&Sewer Systems
' Contact
' Project Name Harold and Rhode Island Reconstruction T
ype Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
I, Description
'Major repairs and reconstruction on the City's sanitary sewer and water systems as needed.Repair will be done in conjunction with the City's Pavement I
�'Management Program on Harold Avenue.This project is in addition to the 2012 PMP project area.
' Justification
__ __- �
To maintain City's water mains and sanitary sewer mains.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 500,000 500,000
Total 500,000 500,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 500,000 500,000
Total 500,000 500,000
� Project# wc�ss-0$9 ��� Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name `7�701'k Stat1011S Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description ,
-
�Ergonomically correct work stations to replace olde style desks that were purchased prior to computers.
Justification
'Utility work station replacements due to age and ergonomics.This would include four workstations.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Furnishings 20,000 20,000
Total 20,000 20,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 20,000 20,000
Total 20,000 20,000
Page 5
Project# w8iss-0O2 �� Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name PjCkU Truck '�'
� ype Equipment
lJseful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description
Pickup"I'ruck for the Utility Department to replace Unit#683,a 2008 F-350 4X4 with utility box,lazge crane hoist and plow.Unit#683 will be transferred to ,
'Vehicle Maintenance. i
Justification
Ilncreased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#683. I
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 85,000 85,000
Total 85,000 85,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 85,000 85,000
Total 85,000 85,000
Project# wc�iLss-0O3 I, Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name Radio Meter Reading System Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
' Description
IFixed base radio metering reading system. �
Justification
IExisting FCC radio frequency utilized for reading city water meters has been banned by the FCC and city is forced to comply with the rule changes. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Furnishings 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
TOtal 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
Page 6
Administration- Utilities Program 7121
7220-Overhead Transfer-General Fund
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Transfer to General Fund 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000
15,000 30,000
$275,000 $275,000 $290,000 $275,000 $305,000 $275,000 $275,000
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
DIVISION: Utility Maintenance(082) PROGRAM: Sewer Maintenance(7722)
2012% 2013%
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 OVER 2011 OVER 2012
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT ADOPTED PROPOSED
Personal Services
6110 Salaries-RegularEmployees $245,768 $247,181 $290,575 $301,610 $290,575 $311,800 $311,800
6111 Overlime-Regular Employees 3,452 5,083 3,000 5,500 3,000 6,000 6,000
6130 Salaries-Temporary Emptoyees 12,403 16,509 18,125 18,125 18,125 18,125 18,125
6150 Employee Insurance 44,742 61,915 62,250 75,405 62,250 78,970 78,970
6160 Retirement 32,969 34,674 47,950 43,225 47,950 45,225 45,225
TOTAL Personal Services 339,334 365,362 421,900 443,865 421,900 460,120 460,120 9.06% 0.00%
Supplies and Services
6320 Operating Supplies 81,125 84,158 87,250 89,250 87,250 70,950 51,500 -18.68% -27.41%
6340 Professional Services 48,538 18,552 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 0.00% 0.00%
6343 Telephone 1,830 1,565 2,000 2,000 2,000 500 500 -75.00% 0.00%
6371 ElectricService 2,151 2,123 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 0.00% 0.00%
6440 OtherContractualService 1,613,203 1,592,657 1,669,390 1,669,840 1,736,090 1,842,220 1,842,220 10.35% 0.00%
TOTAL Supplies and Services 1,746,847 1,699,055 1,826,240 1,828,690 1,892,940 1,981,270 1,961,820 8.49% -0.98%
TOTALS $2,066,181 $2,064,417 $2,248,140 $2,272,555 $2,314,840 $2,441,390 $2,421,940 8.60% -0.80%
++ O (h N N O
N M d � � � M 0�0
N V
� O (O N
� N Q N a N M
E V v3
m
� N M
p � M
d � N
(n O
� �
S °-
y O M N N o
�`1 y N t� � M 0�0
O
p m o f0 U7 �
N O N V N
a N M
�
G7 M
� M
� �
N
y o
� a
S
+• co v v u�
N N � � O� m N
N C N V � � �
V N N
M
N
N
R'
y
�
2
G7 O M N O � O
� N (O 00 ul (O �
E � n a co co
p ,_ W O (O N N
N N N � M
W fA
d �
r �
R
R� N
0
� �
_
� � aD � N I�
� � � m � �
p 0 OD O (O V O
N � N � N
Q fA
N
N
�
�
�
2
W OD (O V M
U o � � � �
Z � m ch rn o �
Z N Q � � � � N
W tfl
H
Z y
� �
�
W
W �
f� _
N � V � 00
� � W � � I� �
� � V O N V U�
N Q OD Q N
V3
N
l0
�
N
�
_
W �
N \
N �
N �
O �
C
c6
� W � �
� U U L �
N - f0 (6 3 C N �
d U C M C �
'@ H N N N N 0 Vl u� � I�
y C � � C "N � �y O
� � @ O � O � N "O
y � � � Q � �
R y N � � � p j E
O N @
m >� � >� c £ � d U
� > N > � � 0 �n O N
V � � V �' C E �
� 1] - 1] U �
� _ = 7 � �
ao a � a � Q
o °
NI " o
M N O �
� NC � f0
O
£ U
�a
rn °7
o �
a
�
�
x
� o 0
0
N y 0 O
O � � �
N p
�
a
d
A
�
N
�.'
2
o °
" o
N d � O
O C � �
N p
U
a>
io
�
N
�
S
a o °
0
� o ,�
� E u' u'
o ._ �
N y
W
N
N
�
�
�
S
.o 0 0
� d a o
Q O M M
N �
Q
d
i0
R'
y
�
2
W � �N
U o � o 0
Z � � u'i
0
Z N Q
W
F
Z y
� �
�
W
W �
!� _
N N
O �0 � V
7 � M
O V
N Q
N
l0
�
y
�
S
rn
N N
d �
N �
O �
a �
a W
W O V
� c
� « �
� �v �
rn
� y C
� (0
N �
E �,
� Y
GI j
> ]
O �
a
�
co a
NI N � �
N � �
� M y
� C � �
N
m U
rn
o �
a` @
�
�
�
2
� u'
N N� N �
O � �
N p
a`
d
R
�
�
�
x
N N
N y � �
O C � �
N p
U
a�
«
R
�
N
�
2
ai in `�
N N
� F �
o E ao
N y
W
N
N
�
�
Q'
2
� � �
d � �
0 � ao m
N �
Q
d
N
R'
N
�
2
o � v°� v°,
o � '° co
N Q
N
l0
�
N
�
2
� � o 0
o � � �
p V N N
N Q
d
N
�
h
�
_
y1 O
N -
N -
A
y N N
r � o
� —
o �
a w
m '6
� o
O N
M �
� �
SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7122
6320-Operating Supplies
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Sewer S stem Re air Parts 18,565 19,949 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
includin : manhole covers/castin s
cement rin
cement sections
sealants
lift station re airs
ie
Landsca e Materials 2,929 6,458 3,000 5,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
includin : beddin rock
it run ravel
black dirt/sod
as halt/concrete
cement
Televisin Camera Parts 2,170 3,353 3,500 3,500 3,500 4,000 4,000
adlocks
Grease Release 2,625 2,746 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,200 4,500
Solid Manhole Covers, I/I 15% 47,348 48,482 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 10,000
a rox 2900 manhole covers throu hout cit )
Drivewa Clean Out Covers, 50 1,341 0 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 2,000
New Sewer Pumps-H 55 lift station emer enc )
Lift Station Su plies 3,173 2,000 2,000
Jetter Hose 2,974 3,170 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500
Sewer Flow Meter Re air Parts 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
$81,125 $84,158 $87,250 $89,250 $87,250 $70,950 $51,500
SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7122
6340-Professional Services
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Sewer Line Groutin /Sealin and Linin 35,000 35,000 35,000 32,000 32,000
Manhole Re airs/Flex Seal Chimne s 9,212 13,412 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
40 X$390 each
Carte ra h WSB 493 970 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Sewer Service Re airs 12,038
Le al Fees 2,760 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,000 1,000
To Hat 17,800
Install Transformer 6,235
Lift Station Re airs 3,991 2,000 2,000
Emer enc Service Call 179
3,000 3,000
SCADA Maintnenance
$48,538 $18,552 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000
SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7122
6343-Telephone
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Concept Proposed Conce t
Lift Stations Phone Line 1,830 1,565 2,000 2,000 2,000
Lift Station SCADA Cell Phones 500 500
$1,830 $1,565 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $500 $500
SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7122
6371-Electric Service
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Concept Proposed Concept
Electricit at Pum Stations 2,151 2,123 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600
$2,151 $2,123 $2,600 $2,600 $2,600 $2,600 $2,600
SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7122
6440-Other Contractual Services
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
MCES wastewater 1,585,847
2010 Flow Total 84,519,050
GV-801.14 or.947881%
2011 FlowTota185,293,980 1,586,844 1,650,545 1,650,545 1,716,570 1,824,000 1,824,000
GV-814.78 or.955261%
Surroundin Cit Sewer char es
Trans Alarm 1,424 1,248 1,600 1,600 1,700 0 0
New Ho e 3 service addresses 1,227 1,475 1,325 1,475 1,400 1,500 1,500
C stal 1 service address) 180 135 220 220 220 220 220
Manhole Re airs
Claim 5,879
Bank/cc Char es-I&I 2,170 2,212 2,200 2,500 2,200 2,500 2,500
Lea ue of Minnesota Cities 12,830 13,500 13,500 14,000 14,000 14,000
sewer backu covera e
Life Safet S stems 185
Miscellaneous Concrete Re air 3,056
Cit of Bloomin ton Sam le Anal sis 405
Ra id Gra hics 391
Under round Piercin 382
$1,613,203 $1,592,687 $1,669,390 $1,669,840 $1,736,090 $1,842,220 $1,842,220
M "' O M N � O
NI M V � � � M a0
� O C � O CO tn
N p N V N �
£ V N c�
A �
p� d M
a � N
O
Q' O
_
G7 O M N � O
N Vl (O e0 � O O
� O �n 1� M o0
O m O (O �
N 0 N V N �
a N M
d M
� M
� �
N
(n O
� �
= O
O � � � �
N N � � 6� � �
� U
N C N � � � m
� N N
U
d
�
�
�
�
2
d O M N O ln O
� /0 � a0 � V [O (O
O £ 6� O c0 N N
N y N V O
W N M
� M
M
i0
� N
� N
Q�' �
_
'O O ln ln ln �
� � � � � � �
O p O� O � V O
N -p N V �
Q N N
d
N
�
�
�
S
LL1 aD (O V M
Z � j N th � O U
Q O V O O In In
Z N Q V V O
w N M
H
Z �
� �
Q'
W N
Q �
� _
� � u) (D
� �p CO a0 N O
0 3 � m m O
O V O O � V N
N Q M � �
N N
N
10
�
�
�
_
m �
N N
N �
N � I�
p @ O
c w
W � � L
c �
� U U L L
c c 3 c o
G7 � C N N C C y6 �
y N N N O rn v� y
f0 � C � �' G .N � '(n L
lO � '� � '@ � N
� � �°n � Q 3
m Y � Z Y a�o > a�
� o o a� o � � m.E
rn
N 3 N � � 0 N .C y N
Q' U � U "' � O 'C �
� 1] - 1] U �
7 - 7 N 'p
�o a � a � Q
CITY OF GOLOEN VALLEY
2012-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
DIVISION: Utility Maintenance(082) PROGRAM: Water Maintenance(7123)
2012% 2013%
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 OVER 2011 OVER 2012
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT ADOPTED PROPOSED
Personal Services
6110 Salaries-RegularEmployees $292,006 $301,561 $290,585 $301,610 $290,565 $311,800 $311,800
6111 Overtime-Regular Employees 14,774 14,294 15,000 16,000 15,000 17,000 17,000
6130 Salaries-TemporaryEmployees 14,768 16,565 18,125 18,125 18,125 18,125 18,125
6150 Employee Insurance 54,089 68,009 68,250 75,405 68,250 78,970 78,970
6160 Relirement 40,314 42,778 51,355 43,225 51,355 45,225 45,225
TOTALPersonalServices 415,951 443,207 443,315 454,365 443,315 471,120 471,120 6.27% 0.00%
Supplies and Services
6320 Operating Supplies 41,073 97,973 63,000 78,000 63,000 78,000 78,000 23.81% 0.00%
6340 ProfessionalServices 52,687 61,140 53,000 53,000 53,000 53,500 53,500 0.94% 0.00%
6440 Other Contrac[ual Service 257,898 413,644 608,600 610,600 753,600 757,000 757,000 24.38% 0.00%
6840 MerchandiseforResale(Water) 2,750,231 2,111,846 2,706,000 2,865,465 2,816,000 2,739,180 2,864,190 1.23% 4.56%
TOTAL Supplies and Services 3,101,889 2,684,603 3,430,600 3,607,065 3,685,600 3,627,680 3,752,690 5.74% 3.45%
TOTALS $3,517,840 $3,127,810 $3,873,915 $4,061,430 $4,128,915 $4,098,800 $4,223,810 5.81% 3.05%
�"1I ~ O O
N M V O O
n NC I� I�
O
£ U
ta
rn °:
o A
a` �
�
a
x
d o 0
N O O O
O 0 1� I�
N `
a
a�
m
�
y
�
_
0 0
N d O O
� V
NC � �
O
U
a�
ia
�
�
�
_
� o 0
� � o 0
0 0
o E � �
N N
W
N
A
�
N
Q'
2
r, a�i °o °o
0 0
o p ui ui
N �
Q
N
i0
0.'
�
�
_
W
Z � j N N
Q O V '7 R
Z N Q
W
H
Z �
� �
�
W y
Q �
� _
� � r r
O �
O V V V
N Q
N
A
0.'
N
Q'
2
rn
a`�i
N �
� O
T E
a W
E c �
W O U
� c
.. @
� '� c
� � �
� y c
d � �
� �
� O
> �
O �
a
�
ic d
� �
M d N �
� V
O C � W
N p
U
r>I
N y
r q
�
E
m
rn �
o =
a
N � N �
O 0 QO o0
N
a
d
A
�
N
�
x
y � �
N y � �
� V
N � � �
O
U
m
m
�
�
�
2
d � �
� m � �
o £ oo ao
N N
W
N
R
�
N
Q'
2
� N N N
O p eD op
N �
Q
N
N
�
�
Q.'
_
Z � � � �
Q N V (O (O
Z Q
W
H
Z �
� �
�
W N
Q �
� _
O � � �
N V V V
a
d
�
�
�
�
x
N O
N —
N —
j0 U N
� y N
d �
�' � O
N —
O E
a W
E m
F c
0
M �
t0 �
Water Maintenance Program 7123
6320-Operating Supplies
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Water S stem Re air Parts 23,316 7,584 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000
H drant Re air Su lies 4,267 9,819 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Landsca e Materials/As halt 13,490 79,469 25,000 40,000 25,000 40,000 40,000
Water Meter/Parts and Su lies 1,101 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
re lacement batteries
ortable interro ator-reads meters
$41,073 $97,973 $63,000 $78,000 $63,000 $78,000 $78,000
Water Maintenance Program 7123
6340-Professional Services
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Water Connection Fee State of MN 45,267 45,238 46,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 46,000
Bad er Service Maintenance 989 1,057 1,000 1,200 1,000 1,200 1,200
Water Re air/Leak Detection 3,513 5,211 3,500 3,500 3,500 4,000 4,000
Utilit Permits 215 215 500 300 500 300 300
Miscellaneous Concrete 1,663 536
Misc.Traffice Control, Hi hwa Technolo ies 200 2,398 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Plumbin 1,022
Bacteria Anal sis moved to 7123.6440 840 1,178
Pum Rental Dewaterin 4,285
$52,687 $61,140 $53,000 $53,000 $53,000 $53,500 $53,500
Water Maintenance Program 7123
6440-Other Contractual Services
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Concept Proposed Conce t
Joint Water Contractuat Services 252,007 410,764 605,000 605,000 750,000 750,000 750,000
re air um s
electricit
hone
misc contractual services
facilitate Cit of Minne olis Governance Task Force
re air to Reservoir
Contractual Re airs Misc. Concrete and Street 4,091 2,100 1,500 1,500 1,500
Bacteria Anal sis Twin Cit Water Clinic 1,800 3,600 3,600 3,600 4,000 4,000
WSB Carte ra h Mana ement 780 1,500 1,500
$257,898 $413,644 $608,600 $610,100 $753,600 $757,000 $757,000
Water Maintenance Program 7123
6840-Merchandise for Resale(Water)
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Water Purchases from JWC 2,750,231 2,111,846 2,706,000 2,865,465 2,816,000 2,739,180 2,864,190
Minnea olis Rates
2013-2.67
2012-2.56
2011 2.46
2010 2.37
2009 2.27
2008 2.12
2007 2.06
$2,750,231 $2,111,846 $2,706,000 $2,865,465 $2,816,000 $2,739,180 $2,864,190
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA
WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FUND REVENUE DETAIL
Aetua12009 Actua12010 Adopted 2071 Estimated 2011 Concept2072 Proposed 2012 Concept2013
Percent Percent Parcent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Revenue Amount o(Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total
WaterCharges (1) $4,130,996 52.6% $3,809,608 51.1% $4,304,300 53.9% $3,932,585 50.8% $4,450,000 53.9% $4A22,955 51.8% $4,103,415 51.8%
SewerCharges (2) 3,168,607 40.5% 3,149,569 42.3% 3,210,000 402% 3,145,620 40.6% 3,325,000 40.3% 3,236,245 41.6% 3,300,970 41J%
Meter Sales 5,336 0.1% 3,793 0.1% 5,000 0.1% 5,800 0.1% 5,000 0.1% 5,000 0.1% 5,000 0.1%
MCES Grant Program 70,643 0.9% 13,286 02% - 110,790 1.4% - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
LatePaymentPenalties 119,687 1.5% 149,544 2.0% 100,000 1.3% 123,450 1.6% 100,000 1.2% 120,000 1.5% 120,000 1.5%
ChargesFOrOtherServices 74,892 1.0% 52,866 0.7% 150,000 1.9% 236,000 3.0% 150,000 1.8% 210,000 27% 210,000 27%
StateWaterTestingFeePassThrough 45,234 0.6% 45,657 0.6% 43,000 0.5% 43,000 0.6% 43,000 0.5% 43,000 0.6% 43,000 0.5%
Miscellaneous Revenue 49,717 0.6% 104,140 1.4% 40,000 0.5% 7,655 0.1% 40,000 0.5% 70,000 0.1% 10,000 0.1%
CertificateofCompliance 63,850 0.8% 80,325 1.1% 45,000 0.6% 70,000 0.9% 45,000 0.5% 60,000 0.8% 60,000 0.8%
InterestEamings 91,096 12% 41,210 0.6% 85,000 1.1% 65,000 0.8% 100,000 1.2% 65,000 O.Bk 65,000 0.8%
TOTALS 57,820,058 700.0% 57.449,998 100.0°/a 57,982,300 700.0% 57,739,900 100.0% f8,258,000 t00.ONa 57,772,200 700.0% 57.977,385 100.0%
Water Rates(1): 4.05/M Gallons
RES up to 79,000 gallons up to 79,000 4.18/M Gallons 4.34/M Gallons 4.45IM Gallons
RES 80,000 gallons and over 4.21/M Gallons 4.37/M Gallons 4.45/M Gallons
IRR all consumption $6 meter+4.21/gallon $6 meter+q.37/gallon $6 meter+4.45/gallon
Sewer Rates(2): 56.10
over 20,000 62.00
Winter Quarter Water Consumption:
0-5000 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00
6000-15,000 56.10 56.10 56.10 56.10
16,000-19,000 62.00 62.00 62.00 62.00
20,000-25,000 65.00 65.00 67.40 69.00
26,000-39,000 72.00 80.00 80.00
40,000-79,000 78.00
40,000-59,000 86.00 98.00
60,000-79,000 92.00 104.00
80,000 and over 84.00 100.00
80,000-99,000 115.00
100,000 and over 127.00
26,000-99,000 68.00
100,000 and over 72.00
Commercial Sewer 3.25 3.37 3.47 3.57
per thousand gallons
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FUND
NET ASSETS ANALYSIS
Net Assets-01/01/11 $7,482,899
Estimated Revenue-2011 $7,739,900
Estimated Expenses-2011 9,113,360
Change in Net Assets Over(Under) Expenses (1,373,460)
Net Assets- 12/31/11 6,109,439
Proposed Revenue-2012 7,772,200
Proposed Expenses-2012 8,453,810
Change in Net Assets Over(Under) Expenses (681,610)
Net Assets- 12/31/11 $5,427,829
Concept Revenue-2013 7,917,385
Concept Expenses-2013 8,651,855
Change in Net Assets Over(Under) Expenses (734,470)
Net Assets- 12/31/13 $4,693,359
Inventory and Accounts Receivabie is $1,959,010.
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
Division: Storm Sewer Utility Maintenance(093)
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT
Personal Services
6110 Salaries-Regular Employees $183,157 $154,555 $180,485 $135,980 $180,485 $154,615 $154,615
6111 Overtime-Regular Employees 8,049 12,224 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
6130 Salaries-Temporary Employees 3,677 4,636 3,300 4,600 3,300 4,600 4,600
6150 Employee Insurance 30,721 34,839 34,850 32,460 34,850 37,230 37,230
6160 Retirement 25,075 22,371 27,995 20,615 27,995 23,690 23,690
TOTAL Personal Services 250,679 228,625 256,630 203,655 256,630 230,135 230,135
Supplies and Services
6320 Operating Supplies 8,395 14,371 16,600 18,600 16,600 19,600 19,600
6324 Clothing 150 176 150 50 150 - -
6334 Street Maintenance Materials 7,781 8,656 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500
6340 Professional Services 129,550 75,314 246,500 190,000 171,500 171,700 171,700
6342 Postage - - 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250
6343 Telephone 218 209 1,100 125 1,100 - -
6344 Use of Personal Auto - 40 200 - 200 - -
6352 General Notices and Publications - - 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500
6371 Electric Service 175 294 500 400 500 500 500
6372 Gas Service 244 146 670 400 670 500 500
6375 Waste Disposal - - 500 500 500 500 500
6382 Contractual Maintenance - 4,450 195 - 195 - -
6390 Rentals - 254 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
6411 Conferences and Schools 951 1,220 2,145 220 2,145 400 400
6413 Dues&Subscriptions 181 - 325 150 325 - -
6440 Other Contractual Services 112,052 103,256 109,230 109,230 113,000 140,915 140,915
TOTAL Supplies and Services 259,697 208,386 396,365 337,925 325,135 352,365 352,365
Vehicle Maintenance Charqes
7401 Maintenance Charges-Labor 6,046 9,684 13,250 13,250 13,250 13,250 13,250
7402 Maintenance Charges-Parts 6,817 9,626 8,750 9,750 8,750 8,750 8,750
7403 Motor Fuels 4,480 4,550 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760
TOTAL Vehicle Maintenance Chgs 17,343 23,860 30,760 31,760 30,760 30,760 30,760
Caoital Outlav
6960 CapitalOutlay 675,673 818,916 1,623,500 1,521,660 2,776,000 2,376,200 1,525,000
TOTAL Capital Outlay 675,673 818,916 1,623,500 1,521,660 2,776,000 2,376,200 1,525,000
Transfers
7220 Overhead Transfer-General Fund 100,000 100,000 106,000 100,000 112,000 150,000 150,000
TOTAL Transfers 100,000 100,000 106,000 100,000 112,000 150,000 150,000
Debt Services
7310 Debt Service-Principal 270,000 280,000 295,000 295,000 305,000 305,000 320,000
7315 Debt Service-Interest 164,250 147,134 140,300 140,300 128,125 128,125 115,140
7320 Fiscal Charges 976 7,263 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
TOTAL Debt Services 435,226 434,397 437,300 437,300 435,125 435,125 437,140
TOTALS $1,738,618 $1,814,184 $2,850,555 $2,632,300 $3,935,650 $3,574,585 $2,725,400
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
DIVISION: Storm Sewer Maintenance(093) PROGRAM: Storm Utility(7307)
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT
Personal Services
6110 Salaries-Regular Employees $50,684 $42,003 $52,615 $52,615 $52,615 $52,615 $52,615
6111 Overtime-Regular Employees 711 4,412 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
6130 Salaries-Temporary Employees 3,677 4,636 3,300 4,600 3,300 4,600 4,600
6150 Employee Insurance 10,127 12,029 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,600 12,600
6160 Retirement 6,767 6,345 7,895 7,895 7,895 8,500 8,500
TOTAL Personal Services 71,966 69,425 77,910 79,210 77,910 80,315 80,315
Supqlies and Services
6320 Operating Supplies 7,384 14,371 11,000 13,000 11,000 14,000 14,000
6340 Professional Services 7,475 14,368 88,500 86,500 13,500 13,700 13,700
6371 Electric Service 175 294 500 400 500 500 500
6372 Gas Service 244 146 670 400 670 500 500
6375 Waste Disposal - - 500 500 500 500 500
6390 Rentals - 254 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
6440 Other Contractual Service 112,052 103,256 109,230 109,230 113,000 140,915 140,915
TOTAL Supplies and Services 127,330 132,689 211,400 211,030 140,170 171,115 171,115
Caqital Outlav
6960 CapitalOutlay 675,673 818,916 1,623,500 1,521,660 2,776,000 2,376,200 1,525,000
TOTAL Capital Outlay 675,673 818,916 1,623,500 1,521,660 2,776,000 2,376,200 1,525,000
Transfers
7220 Overhead Transfer-General Fund 100,000 100,000 106,000 100,000 112,000 150,000 150,000
TOTAL Transfers 100,000 100,000 106,000 100,000 112,000 150,000 150,000
TOTALS $974,969 $1,121,030 $2,018,810 $1,911,900 $3,106,080 $2,777,630 $1,926,430
Y � �
MI M V (O f0
r O C N N
N p u� �
E
U �
�a
rn °'
o �
a
�
�
x
N � �
N O c0 cp
N Q � �
a �
d
A
�
�
�
x
« u, u,
� � � �
O C CV N
N p �n in
U �
d
.,
R
�
N
�
2
d � �
� io � �
O E N N
N y � �
W �
N
N
�
W
Z
W
F � � �
Z � � c0 c0
Q � r
� N � � �
� Q Uf
W
� d
W ip
(� a'
�
�
o �
v�i =
M (h
� j O O
N Q V V
Uj
N
N
�
�
�
_
� �p � W
O 3 � �
O V O O
N Q � �
�
d
A
�
�
d'
2
N
N
O
�
C W
O v
c
N c0
N C
' V N
.� N C
@ N
N � �
lC N
Y
� O
T >
Q' �
U
O �
7
�o a
O O
M N � �
� V
O C � V
N O EA
V
MI N
l0
E �
m
� y
o �
a` _
N O c0 tp
N 0 � �
a
m
A
�
N
�
x
0 0
N d M M
� V
N C M M
O �
U
d
m
�
N
�
2
d o
0
•- m c�o �
o E v v
N y fA
W
d
ie
�
y
�
2
v o 0
� a� o �
N � � �
�
Q
N
A
G.'
W
U y
Q 2
Z
W
~ M M
Z O � (O c0
� N V � �
Q
�
W
� d
W jp
� �
�
Q'
� �
!� _
r r
r n
O � � �
O V M M
N Q EA
N
N
�
N
a'
x
N O
N -
N '
� V N
N y N
r o 0
� —
o �
a W
E �
F c
0
M �
t0 (n
STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7301
6320-Operating Supplies
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Sewer S stem Re air Parts 1,436 7,307 10,000 9,000 10,000 9,000 9,000
re airs from revious PMP ro rams
includin : catch basin castin s
cement rin s
i e/culverts
Landsca e Materials 5,948 7,064 1,000 4,000 1,000 5,000 5,000
includin : ri ra
black dirt
as halt/concrete
cement
sod/ lantin s
$7,384 $14,371 $11,000 $13,000 $11,000 $14,000 $14,000
STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7301
6340-Professional Services
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Professional Services 500 500 500 500 500
Tra Beaver
Contractual Re airs, Liners/Re lacement 10,140 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500
Golden Valle Count Club Sum 4,012
Professional Services 2,140 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Boone Storm Lift Electrical Re airs 1,323 500 500 500 500 500
NPDES Phase II Pond Anal sis NURP Ponds 75,000 75,000
New Shaft-Wisconsin Control Gate 2,860
Commitment and Search Packa e 748
Henne in Count Recordin Fees 269 200 200
Towin Stuck Loader 351
$7,475 $14,368 $86,500 $88,500 $13,500 $13,700 $13,700
STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7301
6371-Electric Service
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Concept Proposed Concept
Electric Service on Pum s 175 294 500 400 500 500 500
$175 $294 $500 $400 $500 $500 $500
STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7301
6372-Gas Service
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Boone Avenue Lift Station 244 146 670 400 670 500 500
$244 $146 $670 $400 $670 $500 $500
STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7301
6375-Waste Disposal
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Ti in Fees 0 0 500 500 500 500 500
$0 $0 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500
STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7301
6390-Rentals
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Small E ui ment for back ard work 0 254 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
$0 $254 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7301
6440-Other Contractual Services
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Bassett Creek Watershed Mana ement 112,052 103,256 109,230 109,230 113,000 140,915 140,915
Commission
$112,052 $103,256 $109,230 $109,230 $113,000 $140,915 $140,915
STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7301
6960 Capital Outlay
2009 2010 2071 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Conce t
Pavement Mana ement Pro'ects and
various other ro'ects included in CIP.
2009:
Residential Storm Sewer Im PMP 639,546
Storm Water Ponds PMP 30,753
Storm Water Dred in 5,464
2010:
Residential Storm Sewer Im PMP 718,914
Storm Water Ponds PMP
Streambank Stabilization 57,749
Storm Water Dred in 42,253
2011:
Residential Storm Sewer Im PMP 600,000 600,000
Streambank Stabilization 786,500 786,500
Storm Water Dred in wait until 2012 105,000
Groundswee er 35,000 32,700
Tandem Axle V-Box Sander(combined 39,360
Tandem Axle V-Box Sander 23,000 0
Sin le Axle V-Box Sander 20,000 0
DeCola Ponds Storm Water Stud 54,000 54,000
Little Lea ue Fields 9,100
2012:
Residential Storm Sewer Im PMP 650,000 800,000
Picku Truck 26,000 26,000
Bassett Creek Streambank Stabilization 1,650,000 730,200
Sin le Axle V-Box Sander 40,000
Sweene Lake Outlet Structure 250,000
Decola Ponds Storm Water Stud 100,000
Wirth Lake Outlet Structure 250,000
Anti Icin Production E ui ment 65,000
Heav E ui ment Mounted Winch 20,000
Fla Avenue Draina e Stud 35,000
Sum Manhole Retrofits 60,000 60,000
2013:
Lakeview Park Water Qualit Im rovements 150,000
Brookview Golf Course Buffer Stud 30,000
Residential Storm Sewer Im PMP) 1,100,000
10th Avenue Culvert Re airs 185,000
675,763 818,916 1,623,500 1,521,660 2,326,000 2,376,200 1,525,000
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Plan
Data in Year 2012 and 2013
PROJECTS BY YEAR
Project Name Department Project# Priority Project Cost
j 2012
Residential Storm Sewer Improvements Storm Sewers SS-Ol nla 800,000
Bassett Creek Stream Bank Stabilization Storm Sewers SS-20 n/a 730,200
Pickup Truck(Storm Water Utility) Storm Sewers SS-22 nla 26,000
V-Box Sander(single) Storm Sewers SS-26 n/a 40,000
DeCola Ponds Storm Water Study Storm Sewers SS-28 n/a 100,000
Sweeney Lake Outlet Structure Storm Sewers SS-29 n/a 250,000
Wirth Lake Outlet Structure Storm Sewers SS-30 n/a 250,000
Winch Mounted on Heavy Equipment Storm Sewers SS-31 n/a 20,000
Anti-Icing Brine Production Room and Equipment Storm Sewers SS-32 n/a 65,000
Sump Manhole Retrofits Storm Sewers SS-33 n/a 60,000
Flag Avenue Drainage Study Storm Sewers SS-35 nla 35,000
Total for 2012 2,376,200
20�
Residential Storm Sewer Improvements Storm Sewers SS-Ol nla 1,100,000
Lakeview Park Water Quality Improvements Storm Sewers SS-10 nla 150,000
Brookview Golf Course-Buffer Zone Study Storm Sewers SS-12 nla 30,000
10th Avenue North Culvert Repairs Storm Sewers SS-24 n/a 185,000
Sump Manhole Retrofits Storm Sewers SS-33 nla 60,000
Total for 2013 1,525,000
GRAND TOTAL 3,901,200
IProject# SS-�1 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
�I Project Name Residential Storm Sewer Improvements Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
' Description
Construction and repair of storm sewer system in conjunction with the Pavement Management Program(see S#1).. I
Justification
Provide an improved storm water runoff drainage system in conjunction with the Pavement Management Program to facilitate surface water runoff;minimize local
drainage and flooding issues and protect pavement.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000
Total 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000
Total 800,000 1,100,000 1,700,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000
Project# SS-lO Department Storm Sewers
' Contact
Project Name Lakeview Park Water Quality Improvements I Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
' Description
Water quality improvements in Lakeview Park to improve water quality in Medicine Lake.The scope of this project is to be determined during preliminary project I
design. I
Justification '
�To reduce nutrients and sediment from storm water runoff in the Lakeview Heights area that drains to Medicine Lake.This project will be consistent with the
Medicine Lake Total Maximin Daily Load(TMDL)Implementation Plan. I
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 150,000 150,000
Total �so,000 �so,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 150,000 150,000
Total 150,000 150,000
IProject# SS-12 I Department Storm Sewers
� � Contact
i, Project Name grookview Golf Course-Buffer Zone Study , TyPe Improvement
Useful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
Description
Perform a study in 2013 to identify locations for the development of native vegetation buffer areas in Brookview Golf Course.Construction of the buffer areas in I
2014. I
Justification
Removal of nutrients and sediment from stormwater runoff entering golf course ponds and Bassett Creek. I
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 30,000 250,000 280,000
Total 30,000 250,000 280,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 30,000 250,000 280,000
Total 30,000 250,000 280,000
Project# SS-20 ' Department Storm Sewers
Contact
� Pro�ect Name Bassett Creek Stream Bank Stabilization T
ype Improvement
Useful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
Description
IStabilize banks along sub reaches of Bassett Creek Main Stem.Need is based on the Bassett Creek Inventory which was completed in 2001 and is updated on an
annual basis.
I
2012: Main Stem(Between Duluth Street and 26th Avenue)-Subreach 2 I
Justification
The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission has additional funding for stabilization of the stream banks thorughout the watershed.Based upon the
availability of funding the Commission has added the portion of Bassett Creek in Golden Valley between TH 169 and the north City Limits just north of Westbrook
Road.The project funding is available beginning in 2011 and 2012.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 730,200 730,200
Total 730,200 730,200
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Bassett Creek Watershed Mg 580,200 580,200
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 150,000 150,000
Total 730,200 730,200
, Project# SS-22 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Project Name p�ckup Truck(Storm Water Utility) ' TyPe Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description ��
'One half ton pickup truck 1br the Storm Water Management and other environmental activities to replace Unit#501 (2000 Ford F-150). I
Justification
IIncreased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 1�501,which will be twelve years old. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Furnishings 26,000 26,000
Total 26,000 26,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 26,000 26,000
Total zs,000 26,000
Project# SS-24 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
'�, Project Name lOth Avenue North Culvert Repairs i TyPe Improvement
Useful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
'�Description
I�Repair Culverts that convey Bassett Creek under l Oth Avenue North and the Union Pacific Railroad.
' Justification
These culverts are technically classified as a bridge by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and are inspected regularly.The last inspection identified high
'level corrosion of the culverts at the base flow level.Although not a high risk for collapse,the corrosion needs to be addressed soon.These culverts are owned by the
lirailroad.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 185,000 185,000
Total 185,000 185,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Union Pacific Railroad 185,000 185,000
Total 185,000 785,000
I Project# SS-26 ' Department Storm Sewers
� Contact
Project Name V-Box Sander(single) Type Equipment
Useful LiTe
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
, Description '
__ -
V-Box sander with hook frame for the single axle dump truck#778.
i� Justification
V-Box sanders are the most efficient and cost effective way to apply the de-icing chemicals for winter operations.V-Box sanders will reduce the impacts of de-icing ',
chemicals on local lakes and streams. '
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 40,000 40,000
TOtal 40,000 40,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 40,000 40,000
Total ao,000 40,000
Project# SS-2$ I Department Storm Sewers
�� Contact
Project Name DCCOIa POII(IS St01'Ill Watel'StU(�)' Type Improvement
l�seful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
Description '
Perform a Hydrologic,Hydraulic,and Flood Mitigation Study of the DeCola Ponds subwatershed,located in the north central porlion of the City.This study will '
develop the storm water runofTmodels for this area,including inflows from New Hope and Crystal,and will investigate storm water management strategies for the
Winnetka Ave and Medicine Lake Road intersection and residential areas around the DeCola Ponds.
Additional study is needed in 2012 to further identify measures to mitigate flood damage at Decola Ponds and the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue areas.
This study will examine future land uses,retrofitting existing land uses,structural floodproofing and other measures to reduce and mitigate flooding impacts.
Justification
This study will give information to proceed to make appropriate improvements.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Planning/Design 100,000 100,000
Total 100,000 100,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 100,000 100,000
Total 100,000 100,000
Project# SS-29 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Project Name Sweeney Lake Outlet Structure I Type Improvement
Useful Life
Cate or Storm Sewer
g Y
Priority
Description
Reconstruction of the outlet structure from Sweeney Lake to a permanent weir. �
Justification
Based upon a request by the City of Golden Valley,the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission has included the reconstruction of the Sweeney Lake
outlet in its CIP.The current strucwre is hand placed concrete that is subject to modification and erosion around each end of the structure.The new structure will
include engineering cut off walls to prevent flow around the ends of and under the structure,greatly reducing the threat of erosion. I
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 250,000 250,000
Total 250,000 250,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Bassett Creek Watershed Mg 250,000 250,000
Total 2�0,000 250,000
Project# SS-3O Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Project Name w��h Lake Outlet Strueture Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
'Reconstruction of the outlet structure from Wirth Lake to prevent high water backtlow from Bassett Creek from entering the lake. I
� Justification
The Total Maximum Daily Load Study for Wirth Lahe iden[ified the backflow of flood waters from the Bassett Creek into Wirth Lake as the primary phosphorus �
load to the lake,resulting in failure to achieve water quality goals.A backflow prevention device was identified as part of the study and has been included in the
Bassett Geek Water Management Commission CIP.The City of Golden Valley will be the lead agency in implementing this project.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 250,000 250,000
Total 250,000 250,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Bassett Creek Watershed Mg 250,000 250,000
Total 250,000 250,000
Project# SS-31 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Project Name w�nch Mounted on Heavy Equipment Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
IDescription '�
�A winch that mounts on heavy equipment for storm tree damage removal from Bassett Creek
�
, Justification
_---- �
IDowned trees obstruct the flow in Bassett Creek creating flooding situations and require removal from the creek to establish flows.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Furnishings 20,000 20,000
Total 20,000 20,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 20,000 20,000
Total 20,000 20,000
�� Project# SS-32 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
I� Project Name Anti-Icing Brine Production Room and Equipment TyPe Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
, Description
IConstruct a room at the I Oth Ave storage to house brine production equipment and storage tanks. I
I, Justification '
'Anti-icing brine production for reducing anti-icing/de-icing chemical application on city streets to reduce the impacts of de-icing chemicals in our creeks,lakes and
wetlands.
The brine production equipment was obtained at no cost from another city.This community replaced and upgraded their equipment to increase de-icing capacity.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Furnishings 65,000 65,000
Total 65,000 65,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 65,000 65,000
Total 65,000 65,000
Project# SS-33 ii Department Storm Sewers
I Contact
� Pr°�e�rNa'"e Sump Manhole Retrofits ��� Typ� [mpro�emen�
vger���ire
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
Description �
Installation of baffles to increase the removal efficiency of existing sump manholes in the storm sewer system. '
Justification
Manhole and ca[ch basin baffles will improve the removal efficiencies for suspended solids and phosphorus.Installation priorities will be in the Sweeney Lake and
Medicine Lake sub-watersheds,where TMDL studies have been completed and approved.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 300,000
Total 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 300,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 300,000
Total so,000 60,000 60,00o so,000 so,000 300,000
, Project# SS-35 � Department Storm Sewers
Contact
P�o�e�t Na'"e Flag Avenue Drainage Study TyPe Unassigned
LJseful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
_ __ --
Preparation of a drainage study in the vacinity of Flag Avenue between Earl Street and Duluth Street. �
Justification
�IThis study will address surface water runoff and ground water issues prior to the scheduled 2015 Pavement Management Program.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 35,000 35,000
Total 35,000 35,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 35,000 35,000
Total 35,000 35,000
STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE Program 7301
7220-Overhead Transfer-General Fund
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Transfer to General Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000
Transfers to Storm Utilit Fund 6,000 12,000
$100,000 $100,000 $106,000 $100,000 $112,000 $150,000 $150,000
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
DIVISION: Storm Sewer Utility(093) PROGRAM: Street Cleaning(7302)
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT
Personal Services
6110 Salaries-Regular Employees $57,463 $37,203 $52,000 $52,000 $52,000 $52,000 $52,000
6111 Overtime-Regular Employees 7,338 7,812 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
6150 Employee Insurance 11,287 11,711 11,800 16,120 11,800 16,120 16,120
6160 Retirement 8,150 5,731 8,150 8,150 8,150 8,150 8,150
TOTAL Personal Services 84,238 62,457 79,950 84,270 79,950 84,270 84,270
Suaplies and Services
6334 Street Maintenance Materials 7,781 8,656 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500
TOTAL Supplies and Services 7,781 8,656 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500
Vehicle Maintenance Charqes
7401 Maintenance Charges-Labor 5,488 9,222 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500
7402 Maintenance Charges-Parts 6,631 8,893 8,000 9,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
7403 Motor Fuels 4,136 3,955 7,510 7,510 7,510 7,510 7,510
TOTAL Vehicle Maintenance Chgs 16,255 22,070 28,010 29,010 28,010 28,010 28,010
TOTALS $108,274 $93,183 $117,460 $122,780 $117,460 $121,780 $121,780
0 0
�I M V O O
�` N C ln lN
O �
E V
�o
rn d
o �o
a` �
�
�
x
N O O O
N � � �
a �
a,
io
�
N
�
S
0 0
N d O O
� t1
O C N N
N p �n �n
U �
N
10
�
N
�
S
N p
O
� � O O
O E N N
N y � �
W �
N
ie
�
N
�
_
� � o 0
N � � �
Q �
N
N
�
�
�
_
� � N N
� O I� 1�
Z N Q M M
ZQ �
J d
U �
F
W
W y
� �
H =
�
o � � �
N Q �i �i
�
m
m
�
N
�
2
a`�i
a�
0
E rn
c W y
� V N
C
N C �
U
N � C �
ip � �W
y
N
� Y�
7
� � N
U(n
O �
7
�o a
STREET CLEANING Program 7302
6334-Street Maintenance Materials
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Concept Pro osed Concept
Brooms for all Swee ers 7,781 8,655 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500
$7,781 $8,655 $9,500 $9,500 $9,500 $9,500 $9,500
CITY OF GOLDEN VAIIEY
2012-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
DIViSiON: Storm Sewer Utility(093) PROGRAM: Environmental Control(7303)
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT
Personal Services
6110 Salaries-Regular Employees $75,010 $75,349 $75,870 $31,365 $75,870 $50,000 $50,000
6150 Employee Insurance 9,307 11,099 10,950 4,240 10,950 8,510 8,510
6160 Retirement 10,158 10,295 11,950 4,570 11,950 7,040 7,040
TOTAL Personal Services 94,475 96,743 98,770 40,175 98,770 65,550 65,550
Suaplies and Services
6320 Operating Supplies 1,011 - 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600
6324 Clothing 150 176 150 50 150 - -
6340 Professional Services 122,075 60,946 158,000 103,500 158,000 158,000 158,000
6342 Postage - - 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250
6343 Telephone 218 209 1,100 125 1,100 - -
6344 Use of Personal Auto - 40 200 - 200 - -
6352 General Notices 8 Public Information - - 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500
6382 Contractual Maintenance - 4,450 195 - 195 - -
6411 Conferences and Schools 951 1,220 2,145 220 2,145 400 400
6413 Dues&Subscriptions 181 - 325 150 325 - -
TOTAL Supplies and Services 124,586 67,041 175,465 117,395 175,465 171,750 171,750
Vehicle Maintenance Charqes
7401 Maintenance Charges-Labor 558 462 750 750 750 750 750
7402 Maintenance Charges-Parts 186 733 750 750 750 750 750
7403 Motor Fuels 344 595 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250
TOTAL Vehicle Maintenance Chgs 1,088 1,790 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,750
TOTALS $220,149 $165,574 $276,985 $160,320 $276,985 $240,050 $240,050
.J o 0
M M N O O
O V
� N 0 � �
U �
E
m
rn d
o m
a` �
�
�
x
y o 0
N N O O
� O
� O � �
N �
a
a
A
�
�
�
x
+-' o 0
� �
� �
N C r r
O �
U
a>
«
R
�
�
�
_
N u� in
� N (h M
o E - -
N y M M
W �
�7
!0
�
y
Q'
_
� � O O
� W
O p � �
N �p I� I�
Q �
d
N
�
J �
� �
�
H
Z O� rn
O o � � �
v C7 M
J O V � �
Q N a n EA
H
Z
W Ci
� m
Z �
O
� �
> �
z =
w
0 0
°' 10 0 0
o �
O V � �
N Q I� f�
�
N
N
�
y
Q'
2
c
0 0
� @
� •` C
� t� �
A � �
� Q 0
y U
�o �0
� c
� N C
� C �
O C
O
� _
C C
t0 Ll.� 11.�
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6320-Operating Supplies
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Office Su lies 25 0 200 200 200 200 200
Presentation Su lies 100 100 100 100 100
Storm Draina e Stencilin Pro'ects 300 300 300 300 300
Buckthorn Pro ram 222 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Com uter 764
$1,011 $0 $5,600 $5,600 $5,600 $5,600 $5,600
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6324-Clothing
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Safet Shoes/Safet Wear Env Coordinator 150 176 150 50 150 - -
$150 $176 $150 $50 $150 $0 $0
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6340-Professional Services
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Professional Services for addressin NPDES 3,387 5,869 44,500 44,500 54,500 54,500
Phase II Water Qualit and Water Quantit
Concerns. case contested in 2011)
Native Buffer Zone Maintenance for Ponds 20,981 20,278 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000
Wetland Bankin Monitorin Re ortin 5 Years 2,238 2,700 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500
General Mills and Minna ua Natural Area
$4,000 First ear-2007. 2,000 for each
of the remainin four ears
S ecial Assessment for Ponds 71,061 32,099 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000
U date SurFace Water Mana ement Plan for 23,126
Com letion of Cit Com rehensive Plan
Develo Storm Water Ordinance 1,282 10,000 10,000
$122,075 $60,946 $158,000 $103,500 $158,000 $158,000 $158,000
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6342-Postage
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Water Resource Education 0 0 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250
Fertilizer Brochure
Newsletter Articles
NPDES Phase II Education
$0 $0 $2,250 $2,250 $2,250 $2,250 $2,250
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6343-Telephone
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Conce t
Environmental Coordinator 218 209 1,100 125 1,100 - -
$218 $209 $1,100 $125 $1,100 $0 $0
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6344-Use of Personal Auto
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Milea e Reimbursement 0 40 200 0 200 - -
$0 $40 $200 $0 $200 $0 $0
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6352-General Notices and Public Information
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Water Resource Education: 0 0 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500
Gradin Permit cover
Fertilizer Brochure
Sum Pum s
Phase II
$0 $0 $5,500 $5,500 $5,500 $5,500 $5,500
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6382-Contractual Maintenance
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
800 MHz Radio Environmental Coordinator) 0 195 0 195 - -
K le Avenue Storm Sewer Pro'ect 4,450
$0 $4,450 $195 $0 $195 $0 $0
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6411-Conferences and Schools
2009 2010 2011 2071 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
MPWA S rin Conference 500 500
U of M Tree Ins ector Certification 165 165 125 165 125
Mana ement Workshops 311 200 200
Environmental Trainin 250 680 1,100 1,100
MPWA Fall Conference 225 220 220
MN Societ of Arboriculture 40
Erosion Control Trainin Ins ections De t 375 400 400
LMC Safet Trainin 15
$951 $1,220 $2,145 $220 $2,145 $400 $400
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Program 7303
6413-Dues and Subscriptions
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
APWA Lundstrom 141 0 145 150 145 0 0
Water Resource Periodicals Lundstrom) 50 50
Erosion Control Periodicals Lundstrom 45 45
MECA Membershi Lundstrom 35 35
International Societ of Arboculture 40 50 50
$181 $0 $325 $150 $325 $0 $0
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
DIVISION: Storm Sewer Utility(093) PROGRAM: Debt Service(7304)
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT
Personal Services
7310 Debt Service-Principal $270,000 $280,000 $295,000 $295,000 $305,000 $305,000 $320,000
7315 Debt Service-Interest 164,250 147,134 140,300 140,300 128,125 128,125 115,140
7320 Fiscal Charges 976 7,263 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
TOTAL Debt Services $435,226 $434,397 $437,300 $437,300 $435,125 $435,125 $437,140
Program 7304
7310-Bond Principal Payments
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
2004 C Storm Sewer Utilit Bonds 170,000 175,000 185,000 185,000 190,000 190,000 200,000
matures 02/01/2019
2006 C Storm Sewer Utilit Bonds 100,000 105,000 110,000 110,000 115,000 115,000 120,000
matures 02/01/2021
$270,000 $280,000 $295,000 $295,000 $305,000 $305,000 $320,000
Program 7304
7315-Bond Interest Payments
2009 2010 2011 2010 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
2004 C Storm Sewer Utilit Bonds 94,343 87,656 80,456 80,456 72,837 72,837 64,670
matures 02/01/2019
2006 C Storm Sewer Utilit Bonds 69,907 59,478 59,844 59,844 55,288 55,288 50,470
matures 02/01/2021
$164,250 $147,134 $140,300 $140,300 $128,125 $128,125 $115,140
Program 7304
7320-Fiscal Agency Costs
2009 2010 2011 2010 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
2004 C Storm Sewer Utilit Bonds 531 845 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
matures 02/01/2019
2006 C Storm Sewer Utilit Bonds 445 431 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
matures 02/01/2021
Arbitra e Re ortin 5,987
$976 $7,263 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
Actua12009 Aetua12010 Adopted 2011 Estimated 2011 Concept2012 Proposed 2072 Concept2013
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Revenue Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total
StormSewerCharges (1) $2.265,937 93.9% $2,279.838 982q $2,212,150 74.3% $2,228.920 747% $2,212,150 56.0% $2.228,920 66.6% $2,228,920 982%
State of Minnesota 56,081 2.3% - 0.0%
Bassett Creek Watershed
Commission 0 0.0% - 0.0% 715,000 24.0% 715,000 24.0% 1,500,000 38.0% 1,080,200 32.3% 0.0%
Other - 568 - - 185,000 4.7% 0.0% 0.0%
Trensfer From Conservation/
Recyling Fund 7,000 0.3% - O.Oq - 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% - 0.0% - O.Oq
InterestEamings 85,045 3.5% 41,575 �.8% 50,000 1.7% 40,000 1.3% 50,000 1.3% 40,000 �2% 40,000 1.8%
TOTALS 52,414,063 100.0� 52321,981 100.0% E2,977,150 100.0% 52,983,920 700.0% j3,947,150 700.0% 53,349,120 100.0% E2,268,920 100.0%
(1)Storm SewerRates 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Residential Property per Quarter $22 $22 $22 $22 $22
Commercial Property per Acre per Month $110 $1�0 $110 $110 $110 �
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
NET ASSETS ANALYSIS
Net Assets @ 01/01/11 $4,217,997
Estimated Revenue -2011 $2,983,920
Estimated Expenses -2011 2,632,300
Excess of Revenue Over(Under) Expenses 351,620
Estimated Net Assets @ 12/31/11 4,569,617
Proposed Revenue-2012 3,349,120
Proposed Expenses -2012 3,574,585
Excess of Revenue Over(Under) Expenses (225,465)
Projected Net Assets @ 12/31/12 $4,344,152
Concept Revenue-2013 2,268,920
Conceptd Expenses-2013 2,725,400
Excess of Revenue Over(Under) Expenses (456,480)
Projected Net Assets @ 12/31/13 $3,887,672
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2013 OPERATING BUDGET
Division: Vehicle Maintenance(070) Program: Vehicle Maintenance(8200)
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT
Personal Services
6110 Salaries-Regular Employees $189,437 $172,650 $198,740 $173,810 $202,715 $186,110 $186,110
6111 Overtime-Regular Employees 1,527 3,511 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
6130 Salaries-Temporary Employees 7,279 2,429 5,860 16,455 5,860 5,860 5,680
6150 Employee Insurance 32,169 29,567 38,900 35,600 39,370 39,370 39,370
6160 Retirement 25,343 23,384 30,845 30,845 31,845 31,845 31,845
TOTAL Personal Services 255,755 231,541 277,345 259,710 282,790 266,185 266,005
Supalies and Services
6320 Operating Supplies 8,106 5,148 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700
6324 Clothing 1,935 2,284 2,650 3,200 2,650 3,200 3,200
6331 Equipment Parts (1,682) 238 5,000 4,000 5,000 4,000 4,000
6343 Telephone 320 209 400 400 400 300 300
6382 Contractual Maintenance (306) 3,728 10,700 10,275 10,700 11,300 11,350
6390 Rentals 23,213 23,300 23,200 23,300 23,200 23,300 23,300
6411 Conferences and Schools 462 283 870 620 870 870 870
6413 Dues and Subscriptions - 135 310 310 310 310 310
6414 Licenses and Taxes 123 123 240 450 240 225 225
TOTAL Supplies and Services 32,171 35,448 51,070 50,255 51,070 51,205 51,255
Caoital Outlav
6960 CapitalOutlay - - - - - 8,000 -
TOTAL Capital Outlay - - - - - 8,000 -
Vehicle Maintenance
7401 Maintenance Charges-Labor 1,701 2,595 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
7402 Maintenance Charges-Parts 1,682 1,431 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
7403 Motor Fuels 706 921 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
TOTAL Vehicle Maintenance Chgs 4,089 4,947 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
TOTALS 292,015 271,936 334,415 315,965 339,860 331,390 323,260
0 Y O M � � �
N M V M O I� � �
� N C � O O � a�O
E V v�
m
� d � �
o io
a � N N
(A O
� � V
S v
N W N O � O
N O M f�
N O M O I� �
O �(7 O O (p
N � I� 0 a0
a �,
m �n �n
m °° °°
� N N
Q' � V
2 �
� N a0 �
N d � O V f�
� U
O C V' O a0 N
N O � O
U �
N
N
�
�
�
_
d a0 � 1� p O
r, � O M [O
M I� I� p 00
O £ � f� O M
N N I� m 0 �
W fp
N � �
� W aD
� N N
R'
= M �
'C � N M O
G7 m M
� +• o �n n
o p V o R o0
N -p f� �
Q �
N � �
� V V
� � �
N N
y c°o v
_ � �n
� 7 � M I� tl')
O In (p
O V V O N
N Q I� I�
�
G7 �
N �
Q' (O
N
N �
� �
S �
� N O I�
� a � O N �
O � �
O V V O � �
N Q 1� N
�
N �7 �
� V V
� (D (O
N N
(n O (O
� � �
_ �
N
U
� @
� C
O �
L C
N
�
� E
C N p �
@ N —
C E N � @
� N � W N
C
� _ � � V N
'[ U N � C i
m p m a� a�i O
N � � � �
m c � � �
� m a� �
m � � �
� � � d c
o L � a� =o
r —
m > a O m'
a o 0
N � V W a�0
pp O C � �
N p (A
� U
ta
rn °i
o �
a
�
�
x
N Q � �
�
O a � �
N � EA
a
d
a
a
N
G.'
_
M
a
0
� � � �
NC � �
O
U
d
.+
eo
�
N
�
2
d o � �
� m � � �
�
N y � O CO
W �
y r
M
� N
N N
K �
S
� « � �
� a °°• °°-
o p �n v�
N y fA
Q
W
A
�
N
�
2
rn rn
o � � �
� �
N V N �
Q
N
16
�
N
0.'
_
rn rn
� � � r
� � N N
o � r �
N Q EA
d
l0
�
N
�
_
N
O
C �
� � W
•� 3
� N N Z
N y � �
� � o �
1� — <p
a � N
� W
y N �9
~ O �
M � �
t0 (n H
Program 8201
6320-Operating Supplies
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Weldin , Grindin , Machinin 259 476 600 600 600 600 600
Medical Su lies 85 200 200 200 200 200
Tools/Parts 1,682 2,080 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400
Sho E ui ment 2,000 4,000 2,000 4,000 4,000
Su lies 1,283 1,200 2,500 2,500
Used Filters 621 512
Plasma Machine Air D er
Com uter 1,382
Carte ra h S stem 2,794 880 500 500 500
$8,106 $5,148 $7,700 $7,700 $7,700 $7,700 $7,700
Program 8201
6324-Clothing
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
3 Mechanic Rental Uniforms 1,791 2,114 1,800 2,200 1,800 2,200 2,200
Additional Clothin Items: 200 200 200 200 200
Safet Boots 3 em loyees X$150/em l0 144 144 450 450 450 450 450
Gloves 26 100 250 100 250 250
Weldin A arel 100 100 100 100 100
$1,935 $2,284 $2,650 $3,200 $2,650 $3,200 $3,200
Program 8201
6331-Equipment Parts
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Parts that are needed to re air 1,682 238 5,000 4,000 5,000 4,000 4,000
vehicles that are not billed directl to
the vehicle.
$1,682 $238 $5,000 $4,000 $5,000 $4,000 $4,000
Program 8201
6343-Telephone
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Cell Phone for Steve Loomis 320 209 400 300 400 300 300
Vehicle Maintenance Foreman
$320 $209 $400 $300 $400 $300 $300
Program 8201
6382-Contractual Maintenance
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Proposed Conce t
Contractual Work to Sho Area 1,266 3,146 10,000 9,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
hoist re air, cranes, etc.
800 Mhz Radio Maint. Henn Co$175/Radio X 960 582 700 575 700 600 650
Used Oil Filters/Floor D lTire Rec clin 700 700 700
moved from 6320
$306 $3,728 $10,700 $10,275 $10,700 $11,300 $11,350
Program 8201
6390-Rentals
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Conce t Pro osed Concept
Rentai Char e for Sho Buildin 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000
Miscellaneous E ui ment Rental 1,213 1,300 1,200 1,300 1,200 1,300 1,300
$23,213 $23,300 $23,200 $23,300 $23,200 $23,300 $23,300
Program 8201
6411-Conferences and Schools
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Conce t Proposed Concept
Su ervisor Trainin Loomis 100 91 100 100 100 100 100
Safet Trainin All Vehicles Sta 36 185 185 185 185 185
Mechanic Trainin Fadden, Goddard 95 100 100 100 100 100
APWA National Conference
MPWA S rin Conference Loomis 250 250 250 250
APWA Snow Conference
Fall Maintenance Ex o 75 75 100 100 100 100 100
Audiometric Examinations 56 60 60 60 60 60
Minnesota Truckin Assoc 75 75 75 75 75 75
CPR Trainin 81
MSSA 61
$462 $283 $870 $620 $870 $870 $870
Program 8201
6413-Dues and Subscriptions
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Concept Proposed Concept
APWA Membershi Loomis 0 135 135 135 135 135 135
Sho Manuals All Vehicles Sta 100 100 100 100 100
MSSA MN Street Su erv Assoc Loomis 75 75 75 75 75
$0 $135 $310 $310 $310 $310 $310
Program 8201
6414-Licenses and Taxes
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Concept Proposed Conce t
Hazardous Waste License Henn Co 53 53 100 60 100 60 60
Hazardous Waste Tax 70 70 70 70 70
Boiler License 20 45 20 45 20 45 45
Fuel License 25 25 250 25 25 25
Fuel Tax License 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
$123 $123 $240 $450 $240 $225 $225
Program 8201
6960-Capital Outlay
2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013
Descri tion Actual Actual Ado ted Estimate Concept Pro osed Conce t
Picku Truck - - 0 0 0 0 0
S ecialt Tor ue Wrench 8,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $0
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
Actua12009 Actua12010 Adopted 2011 Estimated 2011 Coneept2072 Proposed 2012 Concept2013
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Revenue Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total
Charges To Other Funds (1) 292 015 100.0% 27�783 100.0% 334 415 100.0% 315 965 100.0% 339 860 100.0% 331 390 100.0% 339 860 100_0%
TOTALS 5292.015 100.0% E273.783 100.0% f334.415 100.Oh 5375.965 100.0% f339.860 700•0% 5331.390 100.0% 5339.860 100.0°/,
(1)Per hour labor rates charged to departments: 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
$72 $76 $BO $82 $85
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
NET ASSETS ANALYSIS
Net Assets @ 01/01/11 $184,757
Estimated Revenue - 2011 $315,965
Estimated Expenditures - 2011 315,965
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures 0
Estimated Net Assets @ 12/31/11 184,757
Proposed Revenue - 2012 331,390
Proposed Expenditures - 2012 331,390
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures 0
Projected Net Assets @ 12/31/12 $184,757
Concept Revenue - 2013 339,860
Concept Expenditures - 2013 323,260
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures 16,600
Projected Net Assets @ 12/31/13 $201,357
Inventory at 01/01/11 was at $150,348
��t ;'
��' . ,, .a �fler�orandum
31..A° / ,
� �`� �/ Finance
� ``�. ��� N+ � 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fa�t)
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
October 11, 2011
Agenda Item
6. 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Staff will be present at the October 11 Council/Manager meeting to answer questions on the
2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The Planning Commission will review the
document at their October 24 meeting. Those minutes will be shared with Council before the
Council/Manager meeting on November 9. The document will be presented at the December
6 Council Meeting for approval. After approval, the document will be bound and distributed.
Attachments
2012-2016 CIP (118 pages)
� � �� ��
.�
olden
$
va e
..
:��_
� �„��_ .�,� .� : _
_ , , _ : _
.� . ._
� � � �
� __ �
� _ �:�..-�_
.�
, �. ;
� .. , �� 1
` ' ��, �s
; . _ _
. : �. ,_� �I
, ��
,' , „ C�
�
� ��. � �,.� �
��� . .. � ��f�f����yJ"...1 4 v� � �� ��� 7 .� `��� / { '�.
�.
o �,
t � �
e
� t + '} `� ^
�
(� ,{ � �, ,ye � �r_� -� � J,� �L�� 1 � � �
Y �.,�.-^��"" �'� ' x '� �� ��� �� 4�/
5� �°; ,,,, .l�� � � , � ('i'�,. �
�. . � <
�,.:_ � ;�� A � � �a� ,
�. n � e N4
� ' �� V ki � ��� X� � . ,� ' x' � .��M.
�� � �.�f � .�' = � ;f�'� ""f p_' !tt` �
�� --� � � ����;K /� � �'� "
�� �i �� 'i
� �� — — �— �� ' � r�, —�'� �,� ..,,
�,'�° � ,,,,,,,..�•• f
� � ,��� ' � '� .ii'{`li� �r
.
� '.� ¥�' �i�� ....: � ..,. �
I4 0 � �^"�_ �fi3ft Y
,�i r f
. � ^$� �., ���e ��
�S .__.�--....�.- ___"«� � '.� f�
�. t � ,�,�,.,..�,.�. .� .. " x. -
"� � Y,� „°.�,"""".'..
. E ,
,��....:�� � , � �k � , I I �,h
..,�...�.-� �
,.�, .�. M, :�.
� ..�.�--..�..--.•�. �. : �. Il�
. �I
� ..".�.��„'-' "" " "�
, � �.—°- ' _ '� .
:
F 4
�� �
, ,
'� =--_"`" ,s
_ . .
----,.-.� - �„�
. �----_--^ �
; .
_..,_.—.,._. �� � .�
.. � � :
r �
i�, " __. � _
, ,� .
._ --- .
_ � , � � .... ._
�....�a -_ •.�� � ,: �' -
�,� ����.��_� . ..... � �
',, �"„---- '' �- � � , a��
�. �
�'�, `-- `-- : .
__ —.,._�, : .e_
�,, _�_�e_. __=.� . _. .. �__
..� -�,��_.�:.,..,�---�----�-� ,
� . .., . , . .
�__ , , .
-�-�.—+.., a�:
�
s •'+�
p� , y �
�^...� �w��'��� Iltl t
� ���r � 4.:�il�i � � �
£r�.'�:..'°" .
■3 t
5� � �
2012-2016
Ca ital Im rovement Pro ram
p p g
�� �;
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
2012-2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Number
Introduction 1
Financing 3
Exhibit I - General Fund Projects 7
Exhibit II -Water& Sewer Utility Fund Projects 8
Exhibit III - Brookview Golf Course Fund Projects and Working Capital Projection 9
Exhibit IV - Equipment Replacement Fund Projects and Cash Balance Projection 10
Exhibit V - Building Fund Projects and Cash Balance Projection 11
Exhibit VI - Park Improvement Fund Projects and Cash Balance Projection 12
Exhibit VII - City Municipal State Aid Street Fund Projects and Cash Balance Projection 13
Exhibit VIII - Capital Improvement Fund Projects and Cash Balance Projection 14
Exhibit IX - Storm Sewer Utility Fund Projects and Cash Balance Projection 15
Exhibit X - Douglas Drive Corridor Fund Project and Cash Balance Projection 16
Exhibit XI - General Obligation Bonded Debt Tax Levy Projections 17
Exhibit XII - Summary of Capital Improvement Expenditures by Category by Year 18
Exhibit XIII - Financing Summary by Source by Year 19
Vehicles & Equipment (V&E) 20
Buildings (B) 50
Parks (P) 56
Golf (GC) 63
Storm Sewers (SS) 71
Water & Sanitary Sewer Utility (W&SS) 82
Streets (S) 93
Douglas Drive Corridor(DD) 102
Appendix 105
Special Assessment Policy
Fleet Operation, Maintenance, and Replacement Policy
£.
�,y.
� ''��,
-':��, �"��',�.n�.., . �
c ✓'`�
f,,
� �
.�:��� ; '. ��, . ���
�,_;._. .-. . � �,. �
Proposed
2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program
December 6, 2011
Reviewed by Council
October 11, 2011
November 9, 2011
� Reviewed by Planning Commission
October 24, 2011
Mayor
Linda R Loomis
Council
Mike Freiberg, Paula Pentel, DeDe Scanlon, Bob Shaffer
Management Team
Tom Burt City Manager
Stacy Carlson Police Chief
Jeannine Clancy Director of Public Works
Mark Grimes Director of Planning and Development
Rick Jacobson Dire�tor of Parks and Recreation
Chantell Knauss Assistant City Manager
Mark Kuhnly Chief of Fire and Inspection Services
Sue Virnig Director of Finance
Cheryl Weiler Communications Manager
October 11, 2011
The Honorable Linda L Loomis, Mayor
Members of the City Council
Dear Mayor Loomis and City Council Members:
The Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for years FY 2012-2016 is presented with
this transmittal.
The Capital Improvement Program is a five-year fiscal planning instrument that is used to
identify needed capital projects and to delineate the financing and timing of the associated
projects. Generally these projects exceed $10,000 in cost and require long-term financing. An
annual capital improvement budget, encompassing the projects outlined for the first year of the
CIP, is presented to the Council with the City budget. The capital improvement also identifies
bond issues necessary to fund the year's improvements. Each project is brought forth in the
upcoming year for final approval by Council.
The adoption of a CIP is a requirement for each city in the metropolitan area. As part of the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act passed by the State legislature in 1976, each city is required to
adopt a Comprehensive Plan. In 2009, the City's Comprehensive Plan was approved and
accomplished:
• Updated zoning and subdivision codes;
• Housing implementation programs;
• Capital Improvement Program related to transportation, sewers, parks and open space
facilities
Because of its relationship to the Comprehensive Plan, the CIP is reviewed by the Planning
Commission.
The CIP should be viewed as a vehicle to accomplish the goals outlined in the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The goals in the plan cover housing, sanitary and storm sewers, public
facilities, transportation and parks and open spaces. An orderly expenditure of funds on capital
items is a means of accomplishing the Plan.
A complete CIP is an indispensable tool for the City Council and the City staff as they manage
and control the timing and financing of capital improvements needed to maintain the current
high level of City services. A CIP is also used by the bond rating agencies to not only evaluate
the current and future financial condition of a city, but also to evaluate the quality of a city's
management. Adoption of this comprehensive CIP for 2012-2016 will enhance the City's ability
to maintain its current Aa1 bond rating.
Finally, a CIP is a valuable document for commission members and individual citizens to use to
gain an understanding of how their City works and the means to accomplish its overall plan.
The process for completing the 2012-2016 CIP was much the same as the process for the
2012-2013 Budget. Project requests were submitted by all the divisions and reviewed by the
Page 1
Management Team and appropriate supervisors to establish the feasibility and priority of the
projects, and match with available financing.
The CIP is a planning document or guide for the future capital improvements in the City which in
no way constitutes formal approval of the various projects. All of the projects will be formally
approved through the City's purchasing or public improvement process.
Each section lists the upcoming projects, project overview, and an estimated cost of the project.
The Financing section includes a narrative analysis of financing sources involved in the program
along with exhibits analyzing some of these sources, with special emphasis on the City's Capital
Project Funds. Also included is an exhibit which provides an analysis of the estimated future tax
levies needed to finance the City's current general obligation debt and the future general
obligation debt identified in the program. There are also two exhibits which summarize projects
by year, source of financing by year and the category for each project. The sections are:
Financing
Vehicles and Equipment
Buildings
Parks
Golf Course
Storm Sewers
Water& Sanitary Sewer Utility
Streets
Douglas Drive Corridor Study
I look forward to completing these important projects in the coming fiscal year. As we move
forward with this FY 2012-2016, I hope that this CIP meets your approval and provides a useful
tool for the Council as it makes decisions regarding these projects.
Thomas D. Burt
City Manager
Page 2
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
2012 -2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FINANCING
The 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which is detailed on the following pages, is financed
from a variety of sources. The purpose of this section is to describe and analyze these sources, in as much
detail as possible, so that the users of this CIP can be certain that the program as outlined can be financed
from available�nancing sources.
General Fund
The General Fund is the main operating fund of the City, and as such contains most of the City's operating
divisions. The main revenue source for this fund is real estate taxes. Large, non-recurring capital outlay
expenditures are usually made from one of the City's capital project funds. Level annual transfers from the
General Fund to these funds help to even out the annual budgeting process. The General Fund fund balance
as of December 31, 2010 was $9,003,423. Exhibit I lists the General Fund transfers to Funds for projects in
the CIP.
Water�Sewer Utilitv Fund
The Water 8� Sewer Utility Fund is an enterprise fund, which is involved in the operation and renewal 8�
replacement of the City's water and sanitary sewer systems. The main sources of revenue for this fund are
the user charges to those residential and commercial/industrial customers connected to the systems. Per
City policy, new lateral water and sewer system projects are assessed at 100% of cost unless there are
unusual circumstances involved, in which case the City would pay for the difference from the reserve
account. Since the City is essentially fully developed, there should be fewer and fewer of these projects in
future years. These lateral water and sewer system projects are usually requested by property ow►ners, so it
is very hard to project when they might occur and the total cost.
The trunk water system is owned and operated under a joint powers agreement with the cities of Golden
Valley, New Hope and Crystal. This organization is known as the Joint Water Commission. The operating
and capital improvement expenditures of the trunk water system are shared by the three cities. The trunk
sanitary sewer system is owned by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services to which the City makes
monthly payments for the operation of and the capital improvements to the trunk system. Exhibit II is a list of
projects in the program financed by the Water& Sewer Utility Fund.
The retained earnings or net assets of the fund at 12/31/10 was $7,482,899. This amount is down
significantly from prior years primarily because of the improvements to the system with the pavement
management program and inflow/infiltration (I/I) improvements to reduce the flow into the sanitary sewer
system. The financial position of this fund is extremely important because the City is facing large
expenditures in future years for the renewal and replacement of aging water and sewer lines.
�rookview Golf Course Fund
The Brookview Golf Course Fund is an enterprise fund, which is involved in the operation and improvement
of the City's golf course. The main revenue source is green fees paid by the golfers. The golf course
consists of an 18 hole regulation course, a 9 hole par 3 course and a driving range. Many of the
improvements to the course are part of regular course maintenance, but where specific projects can be
defined and costs estimated, they are included in the program. Major pieces of equipment used by the golf
course are also included in the program. The working capital in this fund as of December 31, 2010 was
$1,007,118. Exhibit III is a list of the major course improvements and equipment included in the program and
the projected working capital balances of this fund.
Page 3
Storm Sewer Utilitv Fund
The Storm Sewer Utility Fund is an enterprise fund, which is involved in the maintenance and improvement
of the City's storm water system including storm sewers and holding ponds. The fund is financed from
charges to all the property in the City based on the level of estimated storm water runoff from a given class
of property. Projects funded are those related to the Pavement Management Program, the City's adopted
Storm Water Management Plan and projects constructed in conjunction with the other cities that are
members of the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission. Exhibit IX is an analysis of the projected
revenue, expenditures and cash balances in this fund. Projected expenditures include the annual debt
service payments on the storm water revenue bonds that were sold in 2004 and in 2006. The proceeds of
this issue were used to finance the storm water costs of the T.H. 55 & Boone Ave. project.
Eauipment Replacement Fund
This capital project fund is used to finance major vehicle and equipment purchases for General Fund
divisions. One of the revenue sources of this fund is the proceeds of the sale of Certificates of Indebtedness.
These are short-term general obligation debt instruments issued for a term of four years and repaid from
annual tax levies. Exhibit IV is an analysis of the projected revenue, expenditures and cash balances in
this fund. The estimated future annual tax levies that will be needed to repay the debt service on current and
future certificates of indebtedness issues are detailed in Exhibit XI. Current legislation has allowed cities to
extend the term of these certificates up to ten years if the life of the asset is that in length. We may extend
the term for those certificates that will finance fire pumper replacements.
Buildina Fund
This capital project fund is used to finance major improvements to buildings used by the General Fund
divisions. Wotd Architects completed a city facility analysis in 2006. This plan has been incorporated into the
Building Fund and the 2012 General Fund Buildings Budget as funding permits. A major source of financing
in this fund is transfers from the General Fund. Exhibit V is an analysis of the projected revenue,
expenditures and cash balances of this fund.
Park Improvement Fund
This capital project fund is used to finance major park and open space improvements. One of the revenue
sources in this fund is an annual transfer from the General Fund. Exhibit VI is an analysis of the projected
revenue, expenditures and cash balances of this fund.
Municipal State Aid IMSA) Fund
This fund is used to account for moneys held in account both by the City and the State of Minnesota for use
in the maintenance and improvement of municipal state aid streets located in the City. Streets are
designated as municipal state aid based on criteria established by the State. Each city is allowed a maximum
number of miles of these designated streets. Every improvement project involving these streets must first be
approved by the State. If approved, a certain portion of the projected cost is advanced to the City from its
MSA account at the State, with the balance being paid upon completion. The monies that finance the City's
MSA account at the State come from the State gasoline tax.
The City's MSA account at the State is essentially the City's money, and the amount in the account at any
one time is included as an asset of this fund. The State also participates directly in various street and storm
sewer improvement projects with the City, when the particular project benefits or involves State highways
and rights of way. On the worksheets for street and storm sewer projects, the designation under the
financing analysis of MSA refers to the City's MSA account at the State, and State of Minnesota refers to
Page 4
direct State participation. Exhibit VII is an analysis of the projected revenue, expenditures and cash balances
of the Municipal State Aid Fund.
Doualas Drive Proiect
In October 2010, the City passed an ordinance requiring a franchise fee with Xcel Energy. The franchise fee
will provide one funding source for improvements related to the Douglas Drive project. The City shall use the
franchise fees collected by the Company only for infrastructure costs of the Douglas Drive Project which
include City expenditures for the project, including those financed by bonds. Franchise fee revenue will start
being received in 2011 and will be accounted for separately in this capital projects fund.
Capital Improvement Fund
This fund is the old Debt Redemption Fund that was previously used to finance the special assessment debt
of the City that was sold to finance the initial infrastructure improvements. Now that the debt has been
entirely paid off, the assets of this fund can be used for any purposes designated by the City Council. Monies
in this fund finance infrastructure improvements. Exhibit VIII is an analysis of the projected revenue,
expenditures and cash balances of this fund.
The scheduled transfers from the General Fund to the various capital project funds, as detailed in the
program, are outlined in Exhibit I.
General Obliaation Bonds
To finance certain projects the City must borrow funds extemally by issuing general obligation municipal
bonds. The method(s) of financing the repayment of these bonds differentiates the various types of bonds
used in the program.
Tax Increment Bonds
The proceeds of these bond issues are used to pay for public improvements in specially designated tax
increment districts. The debt service on the bonds is repaid from property taxes on the increased value in
the district over a base year's value. The property taxes on the increased value (increment) are not
distributed to the various taxing jurisdictions, but are retained by the City to pay off the debt service on
the bonds. The increased value in the district comes from the increased commercial/industrial
development made possible by the public improvements financed by the bonds. The City currently has
one tax increment district with the following bonded indebtedness as of December 31, 2011.
District Bonds/Interest Pavable as Of 12/31/11
Golden Hills 14,572,731
The CIP does not include the land acquisition, building demolition and relocation expenditures projected for
these districts. It includes just the basic municipal improvements such as streets, utilities, etc. A pay-go note
was used to finance the North Wirth District No. 3.
Special Assessment�onds
Per State Statute, if at least 20% of the bond principal for a public improvement is financed by special
assessments against benefited properties, the balance can be financed from tax levies against all the
property in the City without the need of a bond referendum. On the project worksheets, if special
assessment bond financing is involved, we have indicated the amount of bonds to be repaid from special
assessments and tax levies.
Page 5
The pavement management program uses special assessment bonds for financing along with
assessments from benefiting properties. These street projects will extend over a longer period than is
included in the 2012-2016 CIP and will be financed by annual special assessment bond issues. On the
project worksheet for the pavement management program, the method of financing is indicated as just
Special Assessment Bonds.
Municipal State Aid (MSA) Revenue Bonds
MSA bonds were sold in 2007 for the first time for the City of Golden Valley. The project was Golden
Valley Road and Bridge replacement. The debt service payments will be repaid over twenty years with
State Aid Allotments used to improve and maintain Municipal State Aid roads.
Tax Abatement Bonds
These bonds will be repaid from the abated City taxes on the General Mills' headquarters expansion,
which has been completed. The abatement agreement was signed between the City and General Mills in
2001 and the bonds were sold in 2004. The City taxes generated by the expansion will not be used to
�nance general City operations, but will be used to pay the debt service on the bonds. The term of the
abatement agreement is fifteen (15) years. On the project worksheets, if tax abatement bond financing is
involved, we have indicated the amount of bonds to be repaid from the annual tax abatement.
Exhibit XI is an analysis of the projected tax levies needed to finance the current and projected general
obligation bonded debt of the City of Golden Valley.
Page 6
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2011 -2015 CIP
GENERAL FUND (FUND 1000)
EXHIBIT I
EXPENDITURES
PROJECT (1) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Transfer to Building Fund $189,970 $189,970 $250,000 $275,000 $300,000
Transfer to Park Improvement Fund 104,740 104,740 250,000 250,000 250,000
Totals $294,710 $294,710 $500,000 $525,000 $550,000
Notes•
(1) The individual building and park projects funded by these transfers
are included in the Building and Parks Sections of the CIP.
Page 7
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FUND (FUND 7120)
EXHIBIT II
2072 2013 2014 2015 2076
Unreserved Cash Balance @ 1/1 $6,109,439 $5,427,829 $4,693,359 $3,984,918 $2,991,465
Revenue�
Water Charges 4,022,955 4,103,415 4,144,449 4,185,894 4,227,753
Sanitary Sewer Charges 3,236,245 3,300,970 3,425,970 3,550,970 3,675,970
State Water Testing Pass Through 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000
Late Penalties 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000
Other 285,000 285,000 285,000 285,000 285,000
Interest Eamings 65,000 65,000 100,000 100,000 900,000
Total Current Revenue for Operations 7,772,200 7,917,385 8,118,419 8,284,864 8,451,723
Total Available 13,881,639 13,345,214 12,811,778 12,269,781 11,443,187
Exoenditures:
Operating Expenditures:
Administration (3%increase) (522,620) (521,105) (536,738) (552,840) (569,426)
Sewer Maintenance (3%increase) (2,441,390) (2,421,940) (2,494,598) (2,569,436) (2,646,519)
Water Maintenance (3%increase) (4,098,800) (4,223,810) (4,350,524) (4,481,040) (4,615,471)
Sub-TotalOperations (7,082,810) (7,166,855) (7,381,861) (7,603,316) (7,831,416)
Capital Outlay:
2012 (1,391,000)
2013 (1,485,000)
2014 (1,445,000)
2015 (1,675,000)
2016 (1,470,000)
Sub-Total Capital Expenses (1,391,000) (1,485,000) (1,445,000) (1,675,000) (1,470,000)
Total F�cpenses _ (8,453,810) (8,651,855) (8,826,861) (9,278,316) (9,301,416)
Retained Eamings(Net Assets) @ 12/31 $5,427,829 $4,693,359 $3,984,918 $2,991,465 $2,141,771
Page 8
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
BROOKVIEW GOLF COURSE FUND (FUND 7150)
EXHIBIT III
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Working Capital @ 1/1 $1,003,768 $1,034,093 $1,069,758 $902,978 $827,198
Revenue:
Total Course Revenue 1,763,350 1,763,350 1,763,350 1,763,350 1,763,350
Total Available 2,767,118 2,797,443 2,833,108 2,666,328 2,590,548
Exaenses:
Operating Expenses: (1,668,835) (1,650,555) (1,742,130) (1,754,130) (1,770,000)
Capital Outlay
2012 (64,190)
2013 (77,130)
2014 (188,000)
2015 (85,000)
2016 (136,000)
Total Expenses (1,733,025) (1,727,685) (1,930,130) (1,839,130) (1,906,000)
Working Capital @ 'i2/31 $1,034,093 $1,069,758 $902,978 $827,198 $684,548
Page 9
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND(FUND 5700)
EXHIBIT IV
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cash Balance� 1/1 1,802,088 1,275,893 1,205,652 820,708 749,915
Revenue:
Proceeds-Certificates of Indebtedness 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000
Proceeds-Certificates of Indebtedness 500,000
Sale of Assets(Auetion proceeds): 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Interest Eamings(Beginning Balance) 26,805 12,759 12,057 8,207 7,499
Total Available 2,613,893 2,073,652 2,002,708 2,113,915 1,542,415
Expenditures:
Bond Costs (8,000) (8,000) (8,000) (8,000) (8,000)
2012 (1,330,000)
2013 (860,000)
2014 (1,174,000)
2015 (1,356,000)
2016 (667,000)
(1,338,000) (868,000) (1,182,000) (1,364,000) (675,000)
NetAssets 1,275,893 1,205,652 820,708 749,915 867,415
Page 10
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
BUILDING FUND(FUND 5200)
EXHIBIT V
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cash Balance @ 1/1 $876,866 $728,220 $608,652 $428,217 $376,428
Revenue•
Transfer From General Fund 189,970 189,970 250,000 275,000 300,000
Cable Capital Grant 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000
Insurance Reimbursement
Interest Eamings 4,384 5,462 4,565 3,212 2,823
Total Available 1,093,220 945,652 885,217 728,428 701,252
EXqenditures:
Cable Equipment (22,000) (22,000) (22,000) (22,000) (22,000)
2012 (343,000)
2013 (315,000)
2014 (435,000)
2015 (330,000)
2016 (330,000)
Total Expenditures (365,000) (337,000) (457,000) (352,000) (352,000)
Estimated Net Assets @ 12/31 $728,220 $608,652 $428,217 $376,428 $349,252
Page 11
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND(FUND 5600)
EXHIBIT VI
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cash Balance @ 1/1 $702,581 $406,190 $225,777 $201,325 $166,625
Revenue•
Transfer From General Fund 104,740 104,740 250,000 250,000 250,000
Park Dedication Fee
Pertormance Area Donation
Interest Earnings 5,269 3,046 1,693 1,510 1,250
Total Available 812,590 513,977 477,470 452,835 417,875
Exuenditures•
2012 (406,400)
2013 (288,200)
2014 (276,145)
2015 (286,210)
2016 (288,450)
Total Expenditures (406,400) (288,200) (276,145) (286,210) (288,450)
Estimated NetAssets @ 12/31 $406,190 $225,777 $201,325 $166,625 $129,425
Page 12
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
CITY STATE AID CAPITAL PROJECT FUND(FUND 5100)
EXHIBIT VII
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cash Balance @ 1/1 $2,942,163 $2,060,831 $2,171,687 $2,311,651 2,451,014
Revenue:
State Aid Bond Payments 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Annual Construction Allotment From State 1,500,000
Annual Maintenance Allotment From State 274,727 274,727 274,727 274,727 274,727
MMAP Agreement(Mn/DO�-Winnekta/55 702,000
Special Assessments-State-Aid Bonds(Harold) 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Special Assessments-State-Aid Bonds;
Golden Valley Rd.-Douglas Dr.to T.H. 100 12,520 12,520 12,520 12,520 12,520
Interest Eamings (%of Beg. Bal.) 29,422 20,608 21,717 23,117 24,611
Total Available 5,560,831 2,488,687 2,600,651 2,742,014 2,882,872
Expenditures:
Maintenance 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Overlay Program 366,000
MSA Debt Service(ends 2027) 189,000 189,000 189,000 191,000 192,000
Harold Avenue Reconstruction 1,500,000
Count Down Pedestrian Signals 25,000
Reconstruct Railroad Crossings 20,000 28,000
Winnetka Ave and Trunk Highway 55 1,300,000
Total Expenditures 3,500,000 317,000 289,000 291,000 292,000
Estimated Net Assets @ 12/31 $2,060,831 $2,171,687 $2,311,651 $2,451,014 $2,590,872
Page 13
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (FUND 6100)
EXHIBIT VIII
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cash Balance @ 1/1 $1,275,840 $1,122,398 $967,422 $810,897 $652,806
Revenue•
Charge to Street Reconstruction Projects to ,
Finance CAD&Pavement Management Systems 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Interest Eamings (1%of Beg. Bal.) 12,758 11,224 9,674 8,109 6,528
TotalAvailable 1,308,598 1,153,622 997,097 839,006 679,334
Expenditures•
CAD Application (11,200) (11,200) (11,200) (11,200) (11,200)
Street Signs (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000)
City Hall Campus Sidewalk Renovation (75,000) (75,000) (75,000) (75,000)
Sidewalk and Trail System Upgrades (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000)
Total Expenditures (186,200) (186,200) (186,200) (186,200) (111,200)
Estimated NetAssets @ 12/31 $1,122,398 $967,422 $890,897 $652,806 $568,934
Page 14
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND (FUND 7300)
EXHIBIT IX
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cash Balance @ 1/1 $4,522,167 $4,289,932 $4,080,838 $3,371,383 $3,050,548
Revenue•
Storm Sewer Charges 2,212,150 2,279,000 2,279,000 2,279,000 2,279,000
Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission 1,080,200 285,000 1,300,000
Union Pacific Railroad 185,000
Interest Eamings 50,000 64,349 81,617 67,428 61,011
Total Available 7,864,517 6,818,281 6,726,455 7,017,811 5,390,559
Exuenditures•
Operating Expenditures:
Storm Sewer Maintenance (401,430) (413,473) (425,877) (493,708) (508,520)
Street Cleaning (121,780) (121,780) (125,433) (145,412) (149,774)
Environmental Services (240,050) (240,050) (247,252) (286,632) (295,231)
Debt Service-Revenue Bonds(2019;2021) (435,125) (437,140) (431,510) (431,510) (431,5'i 0)
Sub-Total of Operations (1,198,385) (1,212,443) (1,230,072) (1,357,262) (1,385,035)
Capital Outlay:
2012 (2,376,200)
2013 (1,525,000)
2014 (2,125,000)
2015 (2,610,000)
2016 (1,335,000)
Sub-Total of Capital Expenditures (2,376,200) (1,525,000) (2,125,000) (2,610,000) (1,335,000)
Total Expenditures (3,574,585) (2,737,443) (3,355,072) (3,967,262) (2,720,035)
Estimated Net Assets @ 12/31 $4,289,932 $4,080,838 $3,371,383 $3,050,548 $2,670,524
Page 15
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
DOUGLAS DRIVE CORRIDOR (FUND 6200)
EXHIBIT X
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cash Balance @ 1/1 $0 $57,650 $462,127 $201,748 $3,304,915
Revenue•
Transit for Livable Communities 375,000 675,000
Hennepin County 1,357,000 9,254,500
MnDOT Cooperative Agreement 1,000,000
Franchise Fees 610,000 610,000 610,000 610,000 610,000
Street Reconstruction Bond 7,608,250
Interest Eamings (1%of Beg. Bal.) 0 577 4,621 2,097 33,049
Total Available 985,000 2,343,227 1,076,748 9,779,095 13,202,464
Expenditures:
Douglas Drive Improvements (675,000) (1,881,100) (875,000) (6,474,100) (13,169,550)
Internal Loan (252,350)
Total Expenditures (927,350) (1,881,100) (875,000) (6,474,100) (13,169,550)
Estimated NetAssets @ 12/31 $57,650 $462,127 $201,748 $3,304,915 $32,914
Page 16
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2072-2016 CIP
GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT TAX LEVY PROJECTIONS
EXHIBIT XI
Principai
Balance
1?J31/17 Maturitv 2012 2013 2014 2015 2018 2017 2018 2019 2020
Current Pavement Management General Obliaation Special Assessment Debt
2000A(2009C)Street Improvement Bonda 3,810,000 2016 $831,925 $838,800 $820,050 $832,550 $824,000
2002A(2009D)Street Improvement Bonda 5,465,000 2018 845,250 831,750 901,500 908,550 914,700 914,950 915,200
2003C SVeet Improvement Bonds 4,870,000 2019 1,019,740 1,002,540 968,360 842,855 715,875 721,475 730,875 728,875
2005C Street Improvement Bonds 5,945,000 2025 302,662 305,537 308,200 310,650 402,887 401,087 399,075 396,850 394,412
2006B Street Improvement Bonds 7,320,000 2028 371,165 373,500 375,630 377,555 379,275 500,790 497,180 493,365 574,290
2007C Street Improvement Bonds 4,105,000 2027 185,255 220,255 218,855 227,455 230,655 233,655 281,455 287,150 292,320
2008A Street Improvement Bonds 6,680,000 2028 279,250 279,250 334,250 342,325 345,050 342,600 344,975 457,162 454,562
2009A Street Improvement Bonds 6,990,000 2029 548,569 548,169 545,669 547,419 198,919 543,919 548,569 547,769 547,594
2010A Street Improvemant Bonds 3,845,000 2030 342,490 169,790 119,290 119,290 946,690 567,590 768,590 107,340 105,840
2011A Street Improvemerrt Bonds 1.840,000 2031 40,160 141,475 129,775 168,275 125,975 174,475 146,975 158,975 165 525
Total 50,870,000 $4,766,466 $4,711,066 $4,721,599 $4,676,924 $5,084,026 $4,420,541 $4,632,894 $3,177,486 $2 534.543
Current Certificates oF Indebtedness General Obliaation Debt
Certificates of Indebtedness�20088 255,000 2012 262,650
Certificates of Indebtedness-20098 505,000 2013 257,965 259,462
Certificates of Indebtedness-20108 685,000 2014 233,115 235,865 233,335
Certificates of Indebtedness-2011B 655,000 2015 4,668 221,565 225,060 222,860
Total 2,100,000
CurteM Tax Abatement Bonds
2004B Tax Abatemerrt Bonds 2,750,OD0 2019 448,675 440,062 430,825 416,375 406,925 397,262 386,950 370,975
General Obliaation Revenue Bonds
2004C Utility Revenue Bonds 1,775,000 2019 266,756 268,918 265,418 266,706 267,568 268,006 267,725 279,700
2006C Utility Revenue Bonds 1,400,000 2021 172,642 172,928 173,007 172,882 172,552 172,018 176,227 175,127 173,695
3,175,000
Currern State Aid Street Bonds
2007A State Aid Bonds 2,190,000 2027 188,831 189,831 190,631 191,231 161,631 186,631 187,032 187,031 186,832
General Obliqation Tax Increment Bonds
2005A Golden Htlls TI Bonds 1,200,000 2015 126,571 128,915 546,877 533,282
20058 Golden H81s TI Bonds 3,690,OD0 2095 407,991 402,710 1,756,910 1,686,475
2006A Golden Hills TI Taxable Bonds 7,845,000 2015 1,242,250 2,294,750 2,492,500 2,950,500
12,735,000
Total Govemment Wide Principal 73,820,000
8 378 580 9 326 072 11 036 162 11 117 235 6 092 702 5 444 458 5 650 828 4 182 319 2 895 070
Page 17
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY BY YEAR
EXHIBIT XII
Category 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total %
Vehicles&Equipment $1,330,000 $860,000 $1,174,000 $1,356,000 $667,000 $5,387,000 7.0%
Buildings 365,000 337,000 457,000 352,000 352,000 1,863,000 2.4%
Parks 406,400 288,200 276,145 286,210 288,450 1,545,405 2.0%
Golf Course 64,190 77,130 188,000 85,000 136,000 550,320 0.7%
Streets 5,420,200 4,839,200 5,146,200 6,069,200 5,403,200 26,878,000 34.9%
Douglas Drive Corridor 920,000 1,881,100 875,000 6,474,100 13,169,550 23,319,750 30.3%
Storm Sewers 2,376,200 1,525,000 2,125,000 2,610,000 1,335,000 9,971,200 13.0%
Water&Sewer Systems 1,391,000 1,485,000 1,445,000 1,675,000 1,470,000 7,466,000 9.7%
Totals $12,272,990 $11,292,630 $11,686,345 $18,907,590 $22,821,200 $76,980,675 100.0%
Page 18
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012-2016 CIP
FINANCING SUMMARY BY SOURCE BY YEAR �
EXHIBIT XIII
Source 2012 2013 2014 201� 2016 Total %
External Sources:
Bassett Creek Water Mgmt Comm 1,080,200 0 285,000 1,300,000 0 2,665,200 3.5%
Union Pacific Railroad 0 185,000 0 0 0 185,000 0.2%
Franchise Fees 610,000 610,000 610,000 610,000 610,000 3,050,000 4.0%
MN DOT 702,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,702,000 2.2%
Transit Livable Communities(TLC) 375,000 675,000 0 0 0 1,050,000 1.4%
Hennepin County 0 0 0 1,357,000 9,254,500 10,611,500 13.8%
Total Extemal Sources 2,767,200 2,470,000 895,000 3,267,000 9,864,500 19,263,700 25.0%
Internal Sources:
Equipment Replacement Fund 1,321,000 860,000 1,174,000 1,356,000 667,000 5,378,000 7.0%
Brookview Golf Course Fund 64,190 77,130 188,000 85,000 136,000 550,320 0.7%
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 1,399,000 1,485,000 1,445,000 1,675,000 1,470,000 7,466,000 9.7%
Building Fund 365,000 337,000 457,000 352,000 352,000 1,863,000 2.4%
Park Improvement Fund 406,400 288,200 276,145 286,210 288,450 1,545,405 2.0%
Capital Improvement Fund 186,200 186,200 186,200 186,200 111,200 856,000 9.1%
Municipal State-Aid(MSA)Fund 2,798,000 317,000 289,000 291,000 292,000 3,987,000 5.2%
Storm Sewer Utility Fund 1,305,000 1,340,000 1,840,000 1,310,000 1,335,000 7,130,000 9.3%
Street Improvement Fund 934,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,134,000 2.8%
Street Reconstruction Bonds 0 0 0 7,608,250 0 7,608,250 9.9%
Special Assessment Bonds 1,600,000 3,836,000 4,171,000 5,092,000 4,500,000 19,199,000 24.9%
Total Intemal Sources 9,570,790 9,226,530 10,526,345 18,741,660 9,651,650 57,716,975 75.0%
Totals All Sources $12,337,990 $11,696,530 $11,421,345 $22,008,660 $19,596,150 $76,980,675 100.0%
Page 19
city of
o�den
g
va e
Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016
Vehicles and Equipment Replacement Section
This section includes all capital equipment and vehicles that help employees have the tools to fulfill
their job requirements. The Vehicle Maintenance department maintains all equipment and vehicles
except for the Golf Course Fund. The City's Information Technology Coordinator maintains the
computers, printers and phone system. Each year each piece of equipment is reviewed before
replacement. This schedule allows the City to finance upcoming purchases for the next five years.
Financing for this fund comes from selling Equipment Certificates. Most certificates are paid back in
four years by a debt levy.
20
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Capital Imp�ovement Plan
2012 tt►ru 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Vehicles and Equipment - -`
Marked Squad Cars(Police) V8E-001 Na 60,000 60,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 420;000
Computers and Printers(Finance) V8E-002 n/a 55,000 60,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 305,000
Imaging System(Finance) VB�E-003 nla 15,000 15,000 26,000 15,000 15,000 86,000
Chipper(Street) VB�E-0O6 n/a 35,000 35,000
Passenger Vehicle(Fire) V&E-011 nla 35,000 35,000
Computer Servers(Finance) V&E-019 Na 35,000 35,000
Portable Computers(Police) VB�E-020 n/a 50,000 50,000 100,000
Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) V�E-024 Na 30,000 30,000
Rotary Mower(Park) V&E-027 nla 90,000 90,000
Rotary Mower(Park) V8E-030 n/a 90,000 90,000
Streetscape Banners(Street) VB�E-038 Na 50,000 50,000
Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) VB�E-041 Na 30,000 30,000
Van(Park and Recreation) V8E-042 Na 25,000 25,000
Pickup Truck(Engineering) VB�E-044 n/a 25,000 25,000
Fire Pumper(Fire) VS�E-U46 n/a 500,000 500,000
Pickup Truck(Park) V8E-047 n/a 25,000 25,000
RotaryMawer(Park) VB�E-04S nla 90,000 90,000
Asphalt Cold Planer(Street) VB�E-052 n/a 15,000 15,000
Pickup Truck(Park) VS�E-056 nla 43,000 43,000
Pickup Truck(Park) V8E-057 Na 40,000 40,000
Fire Hose(Fire) V&E-058 nla 13,000 13,000
Rescue Vehicle(Fire) VB�E-060 Na 100,000 100,000
SidewalklMaintenance Tractor(Stre.et) VB�E-064 n/a 154,000 154,000
Tandem Axle Dump Truck(Street) V&E-066 n/a 260,000 260,000
Utility T�actor Mower V8�E-069 n/a 20,000 20,000
Single Axle Dump TNCk V&E-070 n/a 205,000 205,000
Pickup Truck(Park) V8E-071 Na 45,000 45,000
Pickup Truck(Engineering) V&E-072 nla 25,000 25,000
SidewalkfMaintenance Tractor V8E-073 n/a 158,000 158,000
Uti►ity Tractor V&E-079 Na 72,000 72,000
CSO Vehicle(Police) V8E-081 nla 35,000 35,000
Fire Pumper(Fire) V&E-082 n/a 575,000 575,000
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus(Fire) VB�E-084 Na 300,000 300,000
Utility Vehicle(Fire) V8E-085 Na 45,000 45,000
Pickup Truck(Fire) V8E-087 nla 40,000 40,000
Single Axle Dump Truck(Street) V8�E-088 n/a 235,000 235,000
Page 21
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
SidewalklMaintenance Tractor V8E-089 Na 158,000 158,000
Single Axie Dump Truck(Street) V8E-09d nla 205,000 205,000
Pickup Trudc(Park) V&E-091 n/a 43,Q00 43,000
Marked Squad Digiitaal Recording System(Police) V8E-092 Na 80,000 80,000
Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) V&E-095 Na 30,000 30,000
Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) VB�E-101 n/a 30,000 30,000
Pickup Truck(Fire) VB�E-102 n/a 40,000 40,000
Speed Trailer(Police) V&E-104 n/a 18,000 18,000
Polaris 6 X 6(Fire) V8�E-106 n/a 15,000 15,000
Bobcat Utility Truckster(Park) VB�E-107 n/a 45,000 45,000
Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) VS�E-108 nla 30,000 30,000
Dump Truck(Street) V�E-111 n/a 80,000 80,000
Portable Traf�c Programmable Message Sign V&E-115 Na 25,000 25,000
Bobcat Toolcat(Park) VB,E-117 nla 45,000 45,000
Snow Blower(Street) V&E-118 nla 145,000 145,000
Tasers V8E-121 Na 17,000 17,000
Police Vehicle(Police) V&E-122 nla 30,000 30,000
Vehicles and Equipment Total 7,330,000 860,000 1,174,000 1,356,000 667,000 5,387,000
Equfpmettt Replacement Fund 1,321,000 860,000 1,174,000 9,356,Q00 667,000 5,378,000
Sto�n Sewer Utiltty Fund(7300) 9.� 9.0�
Yehicles and Equipment Total 1,330,OOD 860,000 1,174,000 1,356,000 667,000 5,387,000
Grand Total 1,330,000 860,000 1,774,000 7,356,000 667,000 5,387,000
Page 22
Project# V&E-001 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Cont�ct
rro�ect Name Marked Squad Cars(Police) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
Marked squad cars for the Police Deparhnent per replacement schedule for the City's nine squads.
Justification
IEach year a11 nine squads are looked at based on the number of miles,accidents and overall safety.l'he number replaced may vary based on these factors.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 60,000 60,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 420,000
Total 60,000 60,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 420,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 60,000 60,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 420,000
TOt81 60,000 60,000 9D,000 100,000 110,000 420,000
Project# V&E-002 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
ProjectName Computers and Printers(Finance) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Computers
Priority
Description �
Replacement of computers and printers in the City. Most computers are scheduled to be replaced every four years and printers every eight. The City has a total of
130 computers and printers. Also includes upgrades to the City's computer network system,which includes switches,hubs and fiber connection hazdware.
Justification �
Technology chauges make personal computers obsolete after five years for business purposes. The computers will be replaced on the basis of need.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 55,000 60,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 305,000
TotSl 55,000 60,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 305,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 55,000 60,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 305,000
Tot31 55,000 60,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 305,000
Page 23
Project# V$tiE-0�3 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
rro�ecc rtame Imaging System(Finance) Type Equipment
-- --- -- ------
—----------- -
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Computers
Priority
Description �
The purpose is to scan records digitaily to reduce paper copies and reduce the need for additional storage space for records.
711St1�1Ca1'lOII
Permanent records take up space in City Hall. There is no additional space for filing cabinets,etc.in the City Offices. By imaging documents,all information can
be gathered on the computer instead of digging through cabinets,etc and will be stored in one location.This server is scheduled to be replaced every three years.
Every thrid year a server is purchased.
Eapenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Furnishings 15,000 15,000 26,000 15,000 15,000 86,000
Total 15,000 15,000 26,000 15,000 75,000 86,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 15,000 15,000 26,000 95,000 15,000 86,000
Total 15,000 15,000 26,000 75,000 95,000 86,000
Project# V&E-006 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Chipper(Street) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description
New brush chipper for Street Department to be used in disposal of tree branches removed from the rights of way and parks. The mulch can then be used on the
trails,planters,etc.
-- ---— ---
Justification
Increased costs for hauling and disposing of brush at sites outside the City. —�
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 35,000 35,000
Total �,000 �,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 35,000 35,000
TOtal 35,000 35,000
Page 24
Project# V&E-Ol l Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Pa338IIgCt VB�IIC18�F1C8� Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
New passenger vehicle for the Fire Departrnent to replace Unit 346(2007 Ford Crown Victoria).
�1l3hfiC3110II � — -- ---
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#346.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 35,000 35,000
Tota1 35,000 35,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 35,000 35,000
Total 35,000 �,aoo
Project# V&E-019 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Computer Servers(Finance) Type Equipment
Uaeful Life
Category Equipment:Computers
Priority
Description
Replacement of the City's four servers for the city-wide network computer system. The servers run all City applicaYions and need to he replaced every three years.
Justification
IAdditional disk space will be needed and current technology will be needed for speed and operating systems will need to be updated.
L� - ---- __-- - --
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 35,000 35,000
Total 35,000 35,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 35,000 35,000
Total 35,000 35,000
Page 25
Project# V&E-020 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name portable Computers(Police) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Computers
Priority
�Description — —I
Replacement of portable computers in syuad cars. There are currently ten Toughbook PCs with docking stations.
7ustifiCatiOn
I1'he current machines were acquired in 2008. Increased repair and maintenance occurs as machines age. In addition,new technology requires current hazdware.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 50,000 50,000 100,000
Total so,000 �o,000 700,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 50,000 50,000 100,000
Total so,000 so,000 700,000
Project# V&E-024 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
One new unmacked police vehicle to replace Unit#800(2007 Dodge Charger). 1
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance e�cpenditures on Unit#800,which will be eight years old.
Expendituees 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 30,000 30,000
Z'ptgj 30,000 30,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 30,000 30,000
Total 30,000 30,000
Page 26
Project# V&E-027 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
r�o�ect Name Rotary Mower(Park) Type Ec{uipment
Useful Life
Catcgory Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description —�
16'hydrostatic tractor rotary mower for the Park Departrnent to replace Unit#471(2007 Toro Groundsmaster 580D).
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#471,which will be eight years old. Large mowers of this type are the most cost-effective approach to 1
mowing large open azeas such as pazk land. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 90,000 90,000
Tota1 so,000 90,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replac�ment Fund 90,000 90,OU0
Total so,000 so,000
Project# V&E-030 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Coutact
pro�ect Name Rotary Mower(Park) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description
- --- -- -- — -
16'hydrostatic tractor mower for the Patk Department to replace Unit#472(2008 Toro Groundsmaster 580D). _�
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#472,which will be eight years old. Large mowers of this type are the most cost-effective approach to�
mowing large open areas such as park land. __ _
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 90,000 90,000
Total so,o0o so,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 Z015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 90,000 90,000
Tota1 so,000 so,aoo
Page 27
Project# V&E-038 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Streetscape Banners(Street) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Categoty Equipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
Description �
Replacement of banners for streetscape along Winnetka Avenue and Golden Valley Road. There are two different sets of banners with 216 banners in each set. The
two sets(summer and winter)were purchased in 2007.
Justification
Fabric deteriorates and wlors fade after weathered conditions..
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 50,000 50,000
Tota1 50,000 50,000
Funding Sources ZO12 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 50,000 50,000
. Tota1 so,000 �o,000
Project# V&E-041 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
New unmazked police vehicle to replace Unit#881(2005 Ford Crown Victoria). �
Justification
�Increased repair and maintenance eacpenditures on Unit#881,which will be 7 years old. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 30,000 30,000
Total 30,000 30,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 30,000 30,000
Total 30,000 30,000
Page 28
Pro,ject# V$tiE-042 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Van(Park and Recreation) Type Equipment
Usefal Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
New van to replace Unit#152(1999 Ford Windstar). This van is used to haul supplies and staffto playgrounds for various pazk and recreation programs.
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#152,which will be thirteen years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 25,000 25,000
TOta1 25,000 25,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Pro,ject# V&E-044 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
r�o;ect Name pickup Truck(Engineering) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Velucles
Priority
Descriptioa 1
New pickup truck for the Engineering Department to replace Unit#229(a 1999 Ford F-150 pickup).
Justification
Ilncreased repair and maintenance eacpenditures on Unit#229,which will be 13 years old.
Egpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Page 29
Project# V&E-046 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Coatact
Pro,ject Name Fire Pumper(Fire) Type Equipment
----- —_— _-- -------
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description �
Replace Fire Pumper#338(1999 IntemationaUToyne).
Justification
Fire pumper truck is not dependable enough for an emergency response piece of equipment.Repair and maintenance on Unit#338 exceeds all other Fire pumper
trucks in the fleet.Unit#338 will be 13 years old and would have been due for a refurbishment if it was dependable.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 500,000 500,000
Total so0,0o0 500,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 500,000 500,000
Tota1 soo,000 500,000
Pro,ject# V&E-047 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
rro;ect rtame pickup Truck(Park) Type Equipment
Usefal Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description �
3/4 Ton Pickup iruck for the Pazk Departrnent to replace Unit#452(2000 Ford F-150).
Justification
Increased repa'v and maintenance�penditures on Unit#452,which will be thirteen years old. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Funding Soueces 201Z 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Page 30
Project# V&E-048 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
rro�ecc Name Rotary Mower(Park) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description �
16'hydrostatic tractor rotary mower for the Park Department to replace Unit#460(2002 Toro Groundsmaster 580D).
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#460,which will be eleven years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 90,000 90,000
Total 90,000 90,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 90,000 90,000
TOt81 90,000 90,000
Project# V&E-�$2 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name A,ypbalt Cold Planer(Street) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description
Cold planer attachment for Bobcat T-190 skid streer loader for Street Departrnent to replace Unit#784(MT trackless implement).
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#784,which will be seven years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 15,000 15,000
Total 75,000 15,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 15,000 15,000
TOtal 15,000 15,000
Page 31
Project# V&E-056 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Pro,ject Name plCkup TruCk(Park) Type Equipment
--— ---- ---
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
One half ton pickup truck for the Pazk Department to replace Unit#455,a 2001 Ford F-150.
JUSL'1�Cat10II
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#455,which will be ten years old
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 43,000 43,000
Tota1 43.U0o 43,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 43,000 43,000
Total a�,000 a�,aoo
Project# V&E-057 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Pro,ject Name piCkup Tl'uCk(PaTk) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
3/4 ton pickup truck for the Park Department to replace Unit#456(2001 Ford F-150).
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#456,which will be eleven years old.
Egpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 40,000 40,000
Total 40,000 40,OOo
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 40,000 40,000
Total 40,000 40,000
Page 32
Project# V$tiE-�58 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Fil'e HOSB�F1Y8� Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Ec{uipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
�escription -�
1-3/4",3",and 5"hose. ------- -- -- ---
Justification -�
Replace hose that failed during annual testing.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 13,000 13,000
Tot31 13,000 13,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 13,000 13,000
TOtal 13,000 73,000
Project# V$tiE-060 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
r�o�e�t Name Rescue Vehicle(Fire) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
New Rescue Vehicle to replace Unit 339,a 2001 Ford Excursion. __
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance eupenditures on Unit 339,which will be ten years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 100,000 100,000
Total 100,000 100,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 100,000 100,000
Total 100,000 100,000
Page 33
Project# V&E-064 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Sidewalk/Maintenance Tractor(Street) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heary Equip.
Priority
�Description —�
Sidewalk maintenance tractor for the Street Depariment to replace Unit#753,a 2000 Trackless MT.
Justification —�
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures which will be twelve years old. -�
Eapenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 154,000 154,000
Total 154,000 154,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 154,000 154,000
TOt31 154,000 154,000
Pro,ject# V&E-066 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
r�o�ect Name Tandem Axle Dump Truck(Street) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
�escription �
Tandem aacle dump truck for the Street Deparpnent to replace unit#762(2000 Sterling L-750 dump truck). �
Justification
-- __ -—
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures which will be twelve years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 260,000 260,000
Tota1 2so,000 2so,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 260,000 260,000
Total 2so,000 2so,aoo
Page 34
Project# V$tiE-069 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Utility Tractor Mower Type Equipment
----------—- -------- Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description
Utility Tractor Mower for the Pazk Department to replace Unit#463(2003 John Deere Tractor Mower). —�
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on which will be eleven years old. —�
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 20,000 20,000
Tota1 20,000 20,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 20,000 20,000
Total 20,000 20,000
--- ----- - -
Pro,ject# V&E-�7� Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Single Axle Dump Truck Type Ec�uipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description �
Single Axle dump truck for the Street Department to replace unit#761,a 2003 Sterling dump truck.
Justification �
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on which will be twelve years old. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 205,000 205,000
Total 205,000 205,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 205,000 205,000
TOtal 205,000 205,000
Page 35
Project# V&E-071 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name piCkuP Ti'uCk(Pal'k� Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description 1
Three quarter ton pickup truck for the Pazk Department to replace Unit#466(2004 Ford F-250 pickup).
Justification
Ilncreased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 466,which will be ten years old. __
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 45,000 45,000
TOta1 45,000 45,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 45,000 45,000
Tota1 a5,000 a�,000
Project# V$tiE-072 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
rro�ecr Name pickup Truck(Engineering) Type Equipment
---- -----------------
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description 1
One half ton pickup truck for tt►e Engineering Departrnent to replace Unit#231,a 2004 Ford F-150 pickup. —�
Justification �
�Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 231,which will be ten years old.
---- — — - — ---
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 25,000 25,000
TOt31 25,000 25,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 25,000 25,000
Tot31 25,000 25,000
Page 36
Project# V&�+-073 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Sidewalk/Maintenance Tractor Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description
Sidewalk maintenance tractor for the Street Department to replace Unit#767,a 2003 Trackless MT.
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on unit 767 which will be twelve years old. �
Ezpenditures ZO12 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 158,000 158,000
TOtal 156,000 158,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 158,000 158,000
TOtal 158,000 158,000
Pro,ject# V&E-079 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Utility Tractor Type Eqnipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description �
Utility tractor with broom and flail mower for the Park Department to replace Unit#459
(2001 John Deere Utility Tractor).
�Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on which will be 15 years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 72,000 72,000
Tota1 �z,aoo �2,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 72,000 72,000
Total 72,000 72,000
Page 37
Project# V&E-Ogl Department Vehicles and Equipment
Coatact
Pro,ject Name CSO Vehicle(Police) Type Equipment
Uaeful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
Vehicle for the Police Department Commiu►ity Service Officers,to replace Unit 896,a 2006 Ford Expedition.
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 896,which will be seven years old. 1'his vehicle is used to pick up stray and dead animals �
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 35,000 35,OU0
TOtal 35A00 35,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 35,000 35,000
Total 35,000 35,000
Pro,ject# V&E-082 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
rro�ect Name Fire Pumper(Fire) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description
New fire pumper to replace Unit 331,a 1990 Peterbilt.
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance on Unit 331,which will be twenty two years old. Comply with NFPA standazds.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 575,000 575,000
Total 575,000 575,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 575,000 575,000
TOt41 575,000 575,000
Page 38
Pro,ject# VBtE-084 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus(Fire) Type Equipment
Usefal Life
Category Equipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
Description 1
Replace(40)self-contained breathing apparatus(S.C.B.A)
Justification
Cuaent Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus was purchased in 2003. New S.C.B.A will meet NFPA standard.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 300,000 300,000
TOtal 300,000 300,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 300,000 300,000
Total 300,000 300,000
Pro,ject# VBLF.-�8$ Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Utility Vehicle(Fire) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description l
New vehicle to replace Unit 343,a 2004 Ford Expedition. _
Justification �
�creased repair and maintenance. — - --- — - - �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 45,000 45,000
Total 45,000 45,oU0
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 45,000 45,000
TOtal 45,000 45,000
Page 39
Project# VBiE-�87 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name piCkup Tl'uCk(Fi1'e) Type Equipment
----____
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
New pickup truck to replace Unit 348(2005 Ford F-150). �
Justification �
Ilncreased repair and maintenance on Unit#348,which will be 10 years old.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 40,000 40,000
Tota1 40,000 40,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 40,000 40,000
Z'p� 40,000 40,000
Project# VBLE-�8g Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Single Aale Dump Truck(Street) Type Equipment
— --- - --
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description 1
Single axle dump truck for street depaztment to replace unit#755(2001 Steding L-750 Dump Truck).
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 755,which will be twelve years old.
This expenditure was$205,000 in the 2011-2015 CII'.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 235,000 235,000
Total 235,000 235,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 235,000 235,000
Total 235,000 235,000
Page 40
Project# V$ti�+-089 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Sidewalk/Maintenance Tractor Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
Descriptioa —�
Sidewalk/maintenance tractor for the street department to replace unit#763(2002 Trackless MT). 1
Justification
IIncreased repa�r and maintenance expenditures on Unit 763,which will be twelve years old.
I�__ _
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 158,000 158,000
Tot31 758,000 158,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 158,000 158,000
TOta1 158,000 158,000
Project# V&�+-09� Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Pro,ject Name Single Axle Dump Truck(Street) Type Equipment
— - -- Usefal Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description
Single aacle dump truck for street department to replace unit#755(2003 Sterling L-750 Dump Truck).
�Justification �
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 755,which will be eleven years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 205,000 205,000
Totfl1 205,000 205,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 205,000 205,000
Tot21 205,000 205,000
Page 41
Project# V&E-091 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name plCkup Ti'uCk(Park) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Misceltaneous
Priority
�Description �
One 3/4 ton pickup for the Pazk Department to replace unit#470(2005 Ford F-250 4X2 pickup).
711St1fiC811011 �
IIncreased repair and maintenance expenditures on unit 470 which that will be ten years old. �
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 43,000 43,000
Tota1 43,000 43,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 43,000 43,000
'rp�j 43,000 43,Q00
Project# VBiE-092 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
r�o�ecc Name Marked Squad Digital Recording System(Police) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
Description -I
Install digital video recording equipment in ten mazked police patrol vehicles and associated communications and computer infrastructure to support storage and
maintenance of recordings. _ ___
Justification
�--_
Video recording in a police car is invaluable for any officer-citizen contact,citizen transport in police car,and probable cause related questions. Typical benefits are
increased conviction rates,less time in court proceedings and reduced litigation,increased officer awareness of the'v conduct,training situations and reinforcemen�
and overall easier understanding of any(recorded)situation. Many officer-citizen contacts are one-on-one situations,resulting in factual disputes when citizens
challenge officer conduct. In car video would have proven invaluable in evaluating the facts in several recent citizen encounters. In car video recording capability is
fastly becoming standard equipment in most squad cars.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 80,000 80,000
Total 80,000 80,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 80,000 80,000
Total so,000 80,000
Page 42
Project# V&E-095 Deparlment Vehicles and Equipment
Coatact
Project Name Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) Type Equipment
----------- ----- --
Usefal Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
New unmarked potice vehicle to replace Unit 888(2004 Ford Crown Victoria).
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 888,which will be eight years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 30,000 30,000
Tot81 30,000 30,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 30,000 30,000
Tot31 30,000 30,000
Project# V&E-1�1 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) Type Equipment
Usefal Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
New unmarked police vehicle to replace Unit 893(2005 Ford Crown Victoria) �
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 893,which will be eight yeats old.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 30,000 30,000
Total 30,000 30,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 30,000 30,000
Total 30,000 30,000
Page 43
Project# V&E-102 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name plCkup TTUCk(Fire) Type Equipment
---—-- --- ------ -- Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description —�
Four door pickup truck with storage box for equipment.
Justification
Vehicle to transport fir�ghters to emergency calls and training.Current(y they are taking a fire engine out of service to these calls.
Eapenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 40,000 40,000
Totsl ao,aoo ao,aoo
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 40,000 40,000
Total 40,000 40,000
Pro,ject# V&E-104 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Pro,ject Name Speed Trailer(Police) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
�escription �
The speed trailer was purchased sometime in the eady 1990's and is unit#872. _ _ _
Justification
—- -- ---- -- -�
1'he trailer has aged and needs to be replaced.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 18,000 18,000
Total 18,000 18,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 9,000 9,000
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 9,000 9,000
Total 18,000 18,000
Page 44
Project# V&E-106 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
rro�e�t rtame polaris 6 X 6(Fire) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
Description
One new 6X6 off road rescue vehicle to replace unit#341.
Justification
This unit is utilized for off road rescue operations and fire fighting.This unit was donated in 2004 from Poloris.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 15,000 15,000
Total 15,000 15,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 15,000 15,040
Total 15,000 15,000
Project# V&E-107 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Bobcat Utility Truckster(Park) Type Equipment
-- ----- ---_ ---
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description 1
New utility truckster to replace unit#469(2005 Bobcat).
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#469,which will be nine years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 45,000 45,000
Total 45,000 45,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 45,000 45,000
Total 45,000 45,000
Page 45
� Department Vehicles and Equipment
Project# V&E-108
Contact
Project Name Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Categary Vehicles
Priority
Description
New unmarked police vehicle to replace Unit 899(2007 Ford Crown Victoria)
Justificarion �
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 899,which will be seven years old.
Eapenditures ZO12 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 30,000 30,000
Tot31 30,000 30,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 30,000 30,000
TOtal 30,000 30,000
Project# V&E-111 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Dump Truck(Street) Type Equipment
---------
- - - - — -
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
New Ford 550 dump truck with swaploadet hook system for the Street Departrnent to replace Unit#769(2004 Ford F550).
Justification
-- —-- ----- - --�
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#769,which will be twelve years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 80,000 80,000
Total 80,000 80,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 80,000 80,000
Tota1 ao,000 so,000
Page 46
Pro,ject# V&E-115 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
rro�ect rtame portable Traffic Programmable Message Sign Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
Programmable message sign for traffic control,maintenance work and events for the Street Division.
Justification �
In house programmable message sign for street maintenance activities and city events.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
-- ---- — --—
Pro,ject# V&E-117 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Pro,ject Name Bobcat Toolcat(Park) TyPe Ec{uipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
Description �
Replace Sand Pro Field Drag for the Pazk Division Unit#467(2004 Toro Sand Pro).with a Bobcat Toolcat for versitility of various projects for the depamnent.�
7ustification
Increased repair and maintenance on Unit#467 which will be nine years old.
This exendihue was$15,000 in the 2011-2015 CIP.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicleslFumishings 45,000 45,000
Tota1 a�,000 a�,0oo
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 45,000 45,000
Total 45,000 45,000
Page 47
Pro,ject# V&E-118 Departmeot Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Snow Blower(Street) Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description �
Snow Blower for the Street Division to replace Unit#712(1989 Root Snow Blower)which hooks up to the large Cat loaders for clearing snow from the right-of-way.
Ju.stification
Increased repair,maintenance and parts availability on Unit#712,which will be 24 years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 145,000 145,000
Total 145,000 145,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 145,000 145,000
TOta1 145,000 145,000
Pro,ject# V&E-121 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
Project Name Ta3e1'3 Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
Description —�
30 Tasers were purchased in 2005.These tasers have no warranty peiod left on them for repairs.This amount would allow the Police Depariment to purchase 19 new
units.
�ustification ---- -- —--
Maintenance on each taa�er mns azound$800 per time after the wairat►ty exp'ves.This will allow new units to be purchased and less maintenance costs due to the
warranty period.The police department believes that the use of the Taser both through deployment and threatened deployment continues to rednce the incidence of
injuries to both officers and suspects.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 17,000 17,000
Total 17,000 17,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 17,000 17,OD0
Total 17,000 17,000
Page 48
Project# V$tiE-122 Department Vehicles and Equipment
Contact
rro;ect Name police Vehicle(Police) Type Fquipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
�escription -�
New police vehicle to replace Unit 804(2010 Dodge Caravan).
7i13t1f1C1110II
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 804,which will be eight years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 30,000 30,000
TOtal 30,000 30,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Replacement Fund 30,000 30,000
Total 30,000 3D,000
Page 49
city of
olden
g
va e
Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016
Building Improvement Section
The City owns and or/maintains the following facilities for the purpose of carrying out its mission of
providing needed services to the community and bringing people together by fostering inviting public
spaces where people work and play, encounter their fellow citizens and discover common interests.
This has incorporated the Wold Architects and Engineers city-wide comprehensive facility
assessment building analysis that was completed late 2006.
Golden Valley Buildings
Total S uare Feet
Ci Hall 26,350
Public Safe Police and Fire Station #1 28,000
Streets and Park Maintenance 29,100
Utilities Maintenance 12,950
Vehicles Maintenance 12,500
Warehouse &Animal Im ound 11,490
Golf Maintenance 12,050
Fire Station No. 2 5,785
Fire Station No. 3 6,030
Communi Center/Golf O erations 17,900
A transfer from the General Fund is the main source of revenue.
50
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Capital Imp�ovement Plan
2012 thru 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
�uildings
CableEquipmentReplacement 8-009 Na 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 110,000
Carpet Replacement City Buildings 8-011 n/a 80,000 50,000 160,000
Generators B-012 nla 85,000 85,000
General Buildir�g Repairs and Maintenance 8-025 n/a 210,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 960,000
Replace City Hall Campus Parking Lot B-026 nla 395,000 315,000
Communit�r Cer�er Facility Needs Assessment B-031 nla 100,000 100,000
Vehicle Maintenance Hoist Installation 8-035 Na 120,000 120,000
Fire Departrnent Washer 8 Dryer &037 Na 13,000 13,000
Buildings Total 365,000 337,000 457,000 352,000 352,000 1,863,000
Budldin�Fund(5200) 365,000 337,000 457,000 352,000 352,000 1,863,Q00
Buiddtngs Total as�,000 �i,000 a�i,000 �Z,000 ��,aoo �,sa,000
Giand TOta1 365,000 337,000 457,000 352,000 352,000 1,863,000
Page 51
Project# B-U�9 Department Buildings
Contact
Project Name Cable Equipment Replacement Type Improvement
- _ -._- -----
Useful Life
Category Buildings
Priority
Description _
Replace aging equipment in cable TV control room with updated equipment employing digital technology.
Purchases for the cable equipment is funded from franchise fees on cable usage.If not needed,the remaining monies will be designated for future equipment when
needed.
Justification �
As equipment ages,the use for compatible software and hardwaze changes over time which requires new equipment.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equip/Vehicles/Fumishings 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 110,000
Total 22,000 22,000 22,000 ?2,000 22,000 110,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Building Fund(5200) 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 110,000
Total 72,OD0 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 110,000
Pro,ject# B-Ol l Department Buildings
Contact
Pro,ject Name Carpet Replacement: City Buildings Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category Buildings
Priority
Descriprion �
On-going progam to replace worn out carpet in City buildings. Decision as to which carpet to replace in a given year will be based on an annual inspection of the
condition of the carpets in the various buildings.
-2015 General Services/Finance/Motor Vehiclel Manager's Office-Individual offices only(has been delayed since 2006);City Hall Lunch Room/Council
Conference/Council Chambers/Hallway
-2016 City Hall Lower Level Plan Review Room/Lower Level East Wing Office,Golf Maintenance Offices,Public Safety Detective Offices/Public Safety
Lower Level will include chairs,drapes and carpet in the City Ha11 Conference Raom
1
Justification -� -- --- -
Carpet wears out over time,and an on-going program to replace it is a better altemative than a lazge expenditure in a given yeaz when a number of carpets have to be
replaced.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 80,000 80,000 160,000
Total 80,000 80,000 160,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Building Fund(5200) 80,000 80,000 160,000
Total 80,000 80,000 160,000
Page 52
Project# 8-012 Department Buildings
Contact
Project Name GeneratOps Type Improvement
Usefnl Life
Category Buildings
Priority
Description
Install generated power to the Brookview Community Center,Park&Recreation and Golf Operations Building.
Ji1Sh�CRt1oII
Brookview Community Center,Park&Recreation and the Golf Operations Building currently do not have back-up power.The Community Center is identified as a
location for emergency housing if necessary.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 85,000 85,000
Total 85,000 85,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Building Fund(5200) 85,000 85,000
Total 85,000 85,000
Pro,ject# 8-025 Department Buildings
Contact
rro�ecc Name General Building Repairs and Maintenance Type Improvement
-----_- -- - ----
Useful Life
Category Buildings
Priority
Descnphon
As exterior work is completed,this funding source will address life safety and functionality issues in the interior of city buildings. _�
JUSt1f1CS11011
Repairs will primarilty include roof and siding replacements and other building envelope projects to maintain the integrity of the buildings.Interior improvements
include construction of an office for the Assistant City Forester in the Pazks Maintenance building and providing computer work stations that aze ergonomically
acceptable for staff in the Public Works maintenance departments.In addition,staff will continue to implement the security system projects as identified in the
analysis completed in 2011.
Building and Pazk Shelter Roof&Siding Repairs $125,000
Secuity System Implementation $65,000
Five work stations $20,000
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 210,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 960,000
Total 210,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 960,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Building Fund(5200) 210,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 960,000
Tot81 210,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 9fi0,000
Page 53
Pro,�ect# 8-026 Department Buildings
Contact
rro�ect Name Replace City Hall Campus Parking Lot Type Lnprovement
Useful Life
Category Buildings
Priority
Description —�
A mill and overlay is needed at the City Hall Campus Parking Lot.
Justification —�
This will maintain and preserve the existing parking lot pavements.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 315,000 315,000
TOtal 315,000 315,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Building Fund(5200) 315,000 315,000
TOt81 315,000 315,000
Project# B-O31 Department Buildings
Contact
Project Name Communi Center Facili Needs Assessment T
�' ty ype Improvement
Useful Life
Category Buildings
Priority
Description _]
Currently Brookview houses the City's Park&Recreation Deparlment offices and its Senior Center,conference and community/banquet rooms,a catering kitchen,
and a deck and patio for outd�r events.It also houses tt►e Brookview Golf Course operations offices,grill,locker rooms,and pro shop.In 2014,the original portion
will be 95 yeazs old.
Justification —�
7'he current needs of the building need to be evaluated before plans are drawn for possible construction of a new building.l'his amount involves hiring a consultant
to work with possible groups on the space needs of the building.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Planning/Design 100,000 100,000
TOtal 100,000 100,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Building Fund(5200) 100,000 100,000
Total 900,000 100,000
Page 54
Project# 8-�35 Department Buildings
Contact
Project Name Vehicle Maintenance Hoist Installation Type Improvement
-- ------- ---- ----- —
Useful Life
Category Buildings
Priority
Description 1
Staff completed the wall removal project in order to install a new vehicle hoist for larger equipment to be serviced in-house.
fU3t1f1C8110II
The new hoist system is needed to efficienUy and safely maintain all of Golden Valley's fleet vehicles.The exisitng aged hoist system dces not properly
accommodate the larger eyuipment such as fue trvcks and larger Public Works vehicles that the City operates. Installation of the hoist will take place in 2012
($120,000).
Egpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Furnishings 120,000 120,000
TOt81 120,000 120,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Building Fund(5200) 120,000 120,OU0
Total 120,000 120,000
Project# 8-037 Department Buildings
Contact
Project Name Fire Department Washer&Dryer Type uaassignea
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
Washer and dryer for cleaning protective clothing.
Justification
Current equipment is appro�cimately 20 years old and is requiring increased maintenance.OSHA standazds requ've cleaning protective equipment a minimum of
twice a yeaz.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 13,000 13,000
Tot81 13,000 13,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Bpilding Fund(5200) 13,000 13,000
'rp� 13,000 13,000
Page SS
city of
olden
va e
Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016
Park Improvement Section
The City Council reviews the submissions from the Open Space and Recreation Commission, Park &
Recreation, and Public Works staff for the development and improvement of the City's park system.
The commission consists of nine members that are appointed by the City Council and serve as an
advisory board to the City Council.
In 2006, as part of the City's parks planning initiative on park facilities, the City Council focused this
year on developing a vision for Golden Valley parks and recreation facilities. The City solicited citizen
input via information meetings in parks, a survey of youth athletic association leaders and a citizen
survey was created with the help of the Open Space and Recreation Commission. All information will
be gathered to help plan the future of the park improvements for the next five years. The City will also
use the results from the building survey and ADA consultant.
56
Golden Valley
Parks Activity Areas
rn
c
fp C N ; p� 'O
� .L' � � 'O O � V 7 �
�o �- E d U �O v r w Y c m :; �
O' O d Nl � � � O 'Y C � C d +. _
r � y a, � R .� LL LL V � � 2 J '+�7 � N f0
M N N N LLJ 3 d 07 � � y N Y C O Hl L V � d
� � �
Parks/FaCil' � � t0 ° �0 f0 � � �o o m a�i o �°— � '� a�i � � o
c� x a � m m m �n F- c� x v� c� c� � a m
Brookview Park 33 L 1 2/4L 2
Brookview Golf Course 944
Gea Park 4.7 L 1 1 L L L
Glenview Terrace Park 5 2L
Golden Oaks Park 2 L 1
Ham shire Park 14 L L 2 L L
Hone ell Little Lea ue Fieid 11 1 L/2
Lakeview Park 5 L L 1 L
Lions Park 19 L L 4 1/1F 2 L L
Medle Park 13 L L 2 3L L L
Pe ich Center for Arts Field 1.5 7
Natchez Park 6 L L 1
North T rol Park 9.4 1
Sandbur Ballfields 20 2 3
St Croix Park 1.4
Scha er Park 11 2L
Scheid Park 9.8 L 1 1 1F 2L L L
Seeman Park 4.6 L 1 2
South T rol Park 3.6 L 1 L
Stockman Park 1.5 L 1
Sweene Lake Park 0.5
Wesle Park 20 L L 3 1l1F 3L L L
Wildwood Park 4.2 2 2
Wirth Park M Is Park Board 517 2
Yosemite Park 1.4 L 1 L
Nature Areas
Adeline Nature Area 1.2
Bassett Creek Nature Area 7.6
Briarwood Bird Sanctua 99
General Mills Nature Preserve 27
General Mills Research Nature 57
Golden Rid e Nature Area 1.6
Laurel Avenue Greenbelt 33
Ma Hills Nature Area 14
Penns Ivania Woods 23
Rice Lake Nature Area 9
Tree Farm 1.5
Westem Avenue Marsh 22
F=Fall Use
L=Lighted
*Recreation building restrooms are open seasonally during program hours
57
�
o w
0
0
N �
i
�1 r .. � � '- ' .
� 7 r'3XU� � � u3/� J>�fdC '�_�J ��...:,i,"N?: "'
:C �,\ �1 _ � ...i�, ��� } j
�� , �4 J[�I711AVfN t b. /r j 1 , � ..
O � ,. �� + �i�%/ ��...+�/�)
' \ N� °1 ;Gf � V �
O � �'\,?� � i''' ,I, , � � � I �
, ae I �
"°"'� �
O •.,�P`o � �i Y v` �w \ '
.. �Q�� 4�' .. �
� � `�\� ..,.. . �
�•
O +�.. . 4 ',. .. , ,
_ .
O .� � ri. `�!` ._',., , ... �.. _. ... .. :.t*.pf �_.........� �.
,.... ` f+Q-�,7/NAMI�� ,�,f `J��Ib P'.��Ow � 1 � AV3�� d �� 1� 31 M31�NW 1tl��/.V3 11�'1
N �� a � Hl `3 : NNYRIOGE W i� p(� f �
h I ) d ,�0\'S �
,s.. , �"�J, 5 � f
\ ^'` I 11 Jl MO V31^F�8 }i ¢( 1�Nl �Op4.ry l" / yy . J"'�}
IJ3AYtl `O �\ � � 0.�UIi 1 [d� " f f � r y_• . ,��':.SSVd3..../ '
`....,t .. . ...� ,�. � UIJ3�31 ,� ��� I p��{LBB �I� [ t ? � n ;ra � �iio��t v waiv
. . � ity"v�iinr ,,.�_ �{�`� � ! . aa3yow v� `� � ��• �3/V3Nf1.
i "''�i t N 3AV uN f `�y }I�av,� ", �� � � j�7`' �ruivrrvr� � ` t
" � �3AV33� ii wi� ., / dAa"�e°Ni ,'� � ' ��r�,�. ` �c � ` �- � lSaa'�oo���I�, � ' � I
��� � � .. -� (f
'rl' � a N3AtltlolVlY��� W� �� ,�t_ ? t'' �.--! t , �;•:,w \�,� aa`ao�siiu�iiie� Ej` �,. "
m .:�.
W�'� • � S i �h13�tl3190N � �1 ; Q� �a� � B� ��:' �...^ L�.. f \' ���"X 1 �f 53AV23Fq1YN a
I ORG iARQ:WE N ' 1� ,
1 ;
:�. Z� j �� �'��� � � k� ,i.�T� �°�{�aa�j;�o,�a r � , y�'HA��i'�jyuo � ��r J ��.�„�,r �
.�.`� ��
f Z ._ �� s}�nvvMVUO g� i.:
` � `o;.--^S• z�..�t �w � n3nvnaaadW ! �{��anvaaaa.� (N�rvv ` �F ``� � � a f�� .�e4�h� P � ""`''�,�r,�n
� _� °- �,•. � . -�
o..��i�anri��na`���l .;3' �� Nanviivrw i\^'aosorod� � �5 � . ' _
� � � � : �� °� �
..�.� !- z �o[" '�_ ;� vtna:,�u J.,.'.,. � � naioi3oHd� ..r.. �C' v , # „n � �O
� � i...` �� ' �''�`J i �x' �- "� � � ; . ;�. �� �
� '�._. j 1 ' � h' of °t� f��7l � � �a Q
�� �/ � ✓� ��N3AV003�01 -I�� � �[5! � '
..� f 3 P ��,UNITYAVEN� �'1' � . � . � �- Q I y""�l.—�F,' u ��`.
N �Vll OS yy��,�yp
G� 1 1 '� � � ��� D \ �W N 3AVA1Mf1 � �'�b�tn 1 f II�Y�I�' - �c� , (t � J � ]I""<< ..
..F . _ . . . .._ ((' � � K
�. � . i�,iq:�v7�. . . � .� w`i . : c°;nOl7vM1IM�il7* d �-0G�j4Jlotli,� G� Nu :wut � ~�1Jdxs�N •.?1�'r ' sa �stf3 � a i�tl
W�N3/�Y0731jNIM p1 � � �� . { � '� � ��
N � � �' �'� �r.en �vei1 pj �il z i �� ,., .an!,u.�n� .
�� �� = b; "'�� �� �
�' >( ° r�G3
� � '' ,�'• �i 1. � , �,r �� �.
= � ri anJ a�oiaHOOa • �y�' �.. �
�` 'V �s` Q ;ri3i�� i 2_.l��aov cw ��' anr�vz = pp.� , �� ' l�
� � � (... . N3Atl IFOVI .'� Z ��y �-.,�.
� �- �� � � `_ �' r ' . " N � ,�� � _,�� ,�
� V !N 3AY N�IMSN B � � p�StE�W p
? ��rq,� 3 � � �.tdoa�irvi � ` �� J �) !: �( �:;�:
� � a Q�j � �;;....7 .. � -dt,�. . ` .I ',-,�" uu' -1� ,�i 4 if
�. q $'�
� O m -� $ ' I r I � I , Cl i Nanvaowaa�i; �i �II,.
.� ��°m p (:h"� i s i+�n'v�aiaq}� M � , �
� � Z cQ ., >r_�j � �i Q�\, �i,. z r�fandrroev�� � '
� � �,� N�¢ V( �y'f J� � . �f N3Atl3kXH5��; 5 .v3tlC18� p� .
� �� � � IL_ I �� d} N3nvotro � ��' •�aiaoinuk '�"� t �
a�%` � � � � ( � ��n.��v��ee : ,�y,t�.��y-��
� � �, I � � C� N� �� � p��:.
y'�� + ._-�--/ f � 3� d� I •� .IN3AtlA3Stf31'(S3AVA3 '7�� lu., .
( � ¢ � I
� �� N AtlVNVISI��iI �. 1...�:� �. ' � O . 8�tlAN�fllN 1 �� 1�-r�l t
/
� I. �����
f(Ap � ICrI___N ii'. � xIt ��gnvnmswwi 1J � 'ri3r rowrl:iiini�
� � �If � � � � � � �"N�`YaNtlUWW i \ , �ElE�9� �I .. �._ �� �' �� � .
��� � I N 3nvVOVnSH � !�. p � f.. --1.
� tlO:ATL7N z) C � �I�� 1 Sr9/�Vtl0VA3t� ' .
� �iOAll3:1 � ' � �
� � y 3 0���` }�� ,�t.-�.°� �,T'*. . .���f �� � 3 • 3 �� � ���, `�; �
L V' m `m N rND'O �a bNV 3 i
� � gm� a� � C Hanrri m,� rr�e;� 'S ' � o g ��
/4� � ��a �� ��� f� ;[ � �IJ3�X�3B�o� Ht �� �,. ' � (.id' p f . fy�
Fyy $m� a;�� � 3ndoririsi 3o0�� �1 �� N 3nvdtid�si 3�QHa I r r s v"'° I��1.
° �^aNn'
[, � ' ' o S SI3ar�1
..
� m � .. ,z �' la YH311'HI6f �� ''�'I� .�_.^�t. � �' �'r,,
, dmcicuJu:c�=_-i !..� a . a . . �. �_. , ti , _ ,.. rI �: �3`nv�airvne` /�C
. �3 W3AYtlA13FINIHi.. � .� '. .. I . . T "-� ! i�./ � ( �'.�I s3 H �/��.
! C . �Y�i�wM ,� �
!�) j � `�e'3qrsuaoivn t � 1. "'b �� 11� s`a
� �I{W631B �$ � �i � JVK�DR � � $f `� � 1 /�� �nl" � � AYHy� %��/
,�a' � $ zraaviHao i �f �', �� .z��/'i � vI � .
// � � I
�I 1�,. i � l', ' D • �.naAaiNrH 'i
V/ g .�6 i�ao Hao �. �� { ` <� / . i .. J
1�1 J i3 �1 � ��' . . .
IYr{ � �ro ay Nan`vr�UX'� g ; ���'��;� —f�"�� ` ��n�vi�s��siM� r'� �> ,y d�i i .noye `%' i.�' S
� ' ' r '� :- �, .f ` �� �f `.
6 � � , 1
� �,� �� ��� �• �'a"r°n}nv�• i ��� � I� ��a`wE�� � �� � �S �� � `� �:,� 1
, .
�� � ��� � � : .� .._.�_. .� �—": : � , � t
� � �.� �� _ _ I .
NN�NN3�i?�mm �t 1 Z N3ANY1f10V N3hY3N009 j` NN3AY3NOOB.. . _._.. . A ; .
t���b aD��a� N t� N3Atlpl3AWJ I t� /ti . � � �� �it0A18511q �� �. �.
/u[ �c� ��N � � o i!, � �,
h�l (� �. n3nr�nir�a� �! L� � � r7�nvUniGdaa' a'i, > /r �(�, w, I.
� � �� �,�-�A�� �i '� . { I �� �t t'3.. y�rr !'C �` C_:� S�. I
� a �a ����� �i ���ir) �Ff. .� �� "N�row � � ��1 t� �E�,,i . 1 °,.t �:::v '--�)
p'�� �-- 9 .a � _ i � i , . '��;.c O�' {
� � ��� ���Z�y� �;. �` � ��: . ��-_ �� ; a �. .. �► � ;�.���L � � ,
d .�� �:> � � �� ���� � � ' �� :, .
� .�civivu�or�mo.�F � ` . �
� �: 11GI��A�'/:.11J111 N3r�YMi�t:9'ift(llf�tl II.OJI IYI�NI'1q1 � ' C J/�'•,yh V. 54^�!.V�A�1:�IF1 � '
1 'Fr
£
�
a�
d
Z°i
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Capital Imp�ovement Plan
2012 thn, 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Parks - ----`
Resurface Courts and Hard Surface Areas P-001 n/a 24,000 24,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 123,000
Asphalt Ovedays:Parks,Walkways,Courts,Lots P-002 n/a 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000
Nsw Playground Equipment&Area Curbing P-003 n/a 225,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 625,000
Special Assessments:City Parks P-004 n/a 87,400 94,200 76,145 86,210 88,450 432,405
Park Shelter Building Improvements P-005 nla 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Chain Link Fence RepaidReplace P-007 nla 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 90,000
Parks Total 406,400 288,200 276,745 286,270 288,450 1,545,405
Park Improvement Fund(5600) 406,400 288,200 276,145 286,210 288,450 1,545,405
Parks Totad 406,400 286,2Q0 276,145 286,210 288,450 1,545,405
Grand Total 406,400 288,200 276,145 286,210 288,459 7,545,405
Page 59
Project# P-001 Department Pazks
Contact
rro�ect Name Resurface Courts and Hard Surface Areas Type Lnprovement
Useful Life
Category Park Improvements
Priority
Description �
Resurfacing of City's 23 tennis courts and 17 hard surFace areas in City parks on an"as-needed"basis.
Justification -�
To maintain quality,safety,and usability of City parks. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 24,000 24,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 123,000
TotSl 24,000 24,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 123,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Park Improvement Fund(5600 24,000 24,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 123,000
Total 24,000 24,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 123,000
---_ -- --- ----
Project# P-OO2 Department Parks
Contact
ProjectName �phalt Overlays:Parks,Walkways,Courts,Lots Ty� Improvement
- ------__ __ -- -- . .
Useful Life
Category Pazk Improvements
Priority
Descriprion 1
Asphalt overlay or reconstruction of tennis courts,hazd surface areas and pazking lots on an"as-needed"basis in the City's pazks. Also includes the rehabilitation of
trails in certain parks and open space areas.
-____- _ _--- ---- --
�Justificatioa �
Maintain quality,safety and usability of City parks for a lifetime active sport. Unpaved Vails are deteriorating,with certain segments subject to serious erosion.
Also,certain walking trails are being used year round and paved trails are easier to clear of snow.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000
TOtal 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Park Improvement Fund(5600 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000
Total 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000
Page 60
Project# P-003 - ------ - ---- - Department Pazks
Contact
r�o�ect Name New Playground Equipment&Area Curbing Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category Pazk Equipment
Priority
Description
New playground equipment and area curbing on an"as-needed"basis in the City's parks.
Justification
Old playground equipment is wearing out and will eventually become unsafe. The City is required to meet Consumer Product Safety Commission(CPSC)
quidelines,as well as the requirements of the Americans With Disabilities Act(ADA).In 2012,Brookview Pazk playground equipment will be replaced.Brookview
Pazk has two shelters that are rented and have many events throughout the summer.This park is Golden Valley's premier park.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 225,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 625,000
Total 225,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 625,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Park Improvement Fund(5600 225,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 625,000
Total 2'15,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 625,000
--- ----
Pro,ject# P-U04 ---- Department Pazks
Contact
Project Name Special Assessments: City Parks TyPe Lnprovement
Useful Life
Category Pazk Improvements
Priority
�Description �
Payment of special assessment installations,levied annually to finance improvements to City streets adjacent to the various City pazks. Each special assessment has
a term of ten years. In 2003,Brookview Pazkway,which is adjacent to Brookview Park,was reconstructed,with the first installment of the special assessment was
paid in 2004.
Justification
Special assessments are levied against properry benefiting from the street improvements,including City park property.
-- --- -- ---------- -__ _ --�
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 87,400 94,200 76,145 86,210 88,450 432,405
Tot31 87,400 94,200 76,145 86,210 88,450 432,405
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Park Improvement Fund(5600 87,400 94,200 76,145 86,210 88,450 432,405
Total 87,400 94,200 76,745 86,270 88,450 432,405
Page 61
Pro,ject# P-005 Department Parks
Contact
rro;ect Name park Shelter Building Improvements � Type Lnprovement
Useful Life
Category Pazk Improvements
Priority
Descriprion
This on-going program includes various repairs needed,including repairs to interior door frames,sky light replacement and/or repair,e3rterior wood replacement
and/or repair and time clock upgrades for lighting systems.
Justification
Repairs need to be made to keep cucrent buildings usable and accessible.In 2011,the City completed a building condition analysis of all park shelters for future
planning of improvements.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Tot81 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Park Improvement Fund(5600 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Total 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Project# P-OO7 Department Parks
Contact
Project Name Chain Link Fence Repair/Replace Type Improvement
- ----
---------- --.
Useful Life
Category Park Lnprovements
Priority
Description
Repair and Replacement of chain-link fencing at various softball fields,baseball fields and tennis courts. �
Justification �
To maintain safety and functionability of fencing in City parks.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 90,000
Total 15,000 15,000 20,000 Z0,000 20,000 90,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Park Improvement Fund(5600 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 Z0,000 90,000
Total 15,000 75,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 90,000
Page 62
city of
olden
va e
Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016
Brookview Golf Course Section
Brookview Golf Course is owned and operated by the City of Golden Valley under the auspices of the
Park and Recreation Department. The Brookview golf facility consists of an 18 —Hole Regulation
Course and a 9-Hole Par 3, a Driving Range and teaching area, and a Golf Shop and Grill.
Brookview's Regulation Course is a challenging, mature course with some tree-lined fairways, 28
moderate bunkers, fairly small greens, and an abundance of water hazards. A maintenance building
at 100 Brookview Parkway and Clubhouse are rented from the City.
Green fees are the main source of revenue.
History:
Brookview Golf Course was a private country club until the late 1960s, when the City of Golden Valley
purchased the facility to operate as a municipal golf course. In 1976-77, the course underwent major
renovations with the addition of the Par 3 nine-hole course and Driving Range. In 1984-85, extensive
work was done to bridge the fairways and enlarge the ponds to alleviate flooding. The Regulation
Course was closed in 1990 to redesign and rebuild the greens. That same year, the clubhouse was
enlarged and remodeled.
63
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Capital Imp�ovement Plan
2012 thru 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Golf Course --`
SpecialAssessment-Street GC-U01 Na 17,190 16,130 33,320
GreenlTee Mowers GG003 nla 26,000 28,000 29,000 30,000 31,000 144,000
Rough Mowers GC-010 n/a 65,000 75,000 140,000
Sand Trep Rake GC-013 Na 23,000 23,000
Five Plex Fairvvay Mower GC-014 n/a 44,000 44,000
Cooking GriIVOven GC-020 Na 10,000 10,000
FreezerNValk-in Cooler GC-021 Na 25,000 25,000
Bridge Approach Improvement GC-023 n/a 30,000 30,000 60,000
Hole#14 Renovation GC-024 Na 50,000 50,000
Verticuts for Fairvvay Mower GC-025 n/a 6,000 6,000
Irrigation System Upgrade GG026 n/a 8,000 8,000
Radio Equipment GG027 n/a 7,000 7,000
Golf Course Total 64,190 77,130 188,000 85,000 136,000 550,320
Brookvlew Golf Coutse Fu►td 64,190 T7,130 188,000 85,000 136,000 550,320
GodfCou►se Total 64,190 T7,730 188,000 85,000 136,000 550,320
Grand Total 64,190 T7,730 188,000 85,000 136,000 550,320
Page 64
Project# GC-001 Department Golf Course
Contact
Project Name Special Assessment-Street Type Lnprovement
Useful Life
Category Street Construction
Priority
�scription �
Special assessment for the reconstruction of Brookview Pazkway from Western Avenue south to the driving range,including the parking area The special �
assessment will have a term of ten yeazs at an interest rate of seven percent. The project was completed in 2003.
�Justification
Street was reconstructed as part of the City's pavement management progam. This street provides parking for the golf course in the area adjacent to the Community
Center.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Other 17,190 16,130 33,320
Total 17,190 16,130 33,320
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 17,190 16,130 33,320
TOtal 17,190 16,130 33,320
__-
P%ject# GC-0�3 Department Golf Course
Contact
Project Name GPCC11/TeC MOWC15 T
ype Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
�Description �
- - -- -- -
Green/Tee mowers to replace current unit. One unit to be replaced in each year shown._ �
�Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on current units.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 26,000 28,000 29,000 30,000 31,000 144,000
TOtal 26,000 28,000 29,000 30,000 31,000 144,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 26,000 28,000 29,000 30,000 31,000 144,000
Total 26,000 28,000 29,000 30,000 31,000 144,000
Page 65
Project# GC-010 Department Golf Course
Contact
Project Name ROUgh MOwePS Ty�►ee Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Heavy Equip.
Priority
Description
Rough Mower to replace current unit.
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on current units.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 65,000 75,000 140,000
TOt�1 65,000 75,000 740,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 65,000 75,000 140,000
Total 65,000 75,000 140,000
Project# GC-013 Department Golf Course
COOGRCt
Project Name Sand Trap Rake Type Unassigned
—_ —--— --- Usefal Life
Category Equipment:Electronics
Priority
Description �
Three wheel machine that rakes thirty-two sand traps every day of the golfing season.
Justification 1 --_- -
The sand trap rake was purchased in 2002.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 23,000 23,000
Z'p�j 23,000 23,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 23,000 23,000
Total 23,000 23,000
Page 66
Project# GC-014 Department Golf Course
Contact
rro�ect Name Five Plez Fairway Mower Type unass�gnea
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
Description �
Mows the Golf Course Fainvays five times a week during the gotf season.
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on cwrent unit.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 44,000 44,000
Tota1 aa,000 aa,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 44,000 44,000
Total 44,000 44,000
Project# GC-O2� Department Golf Course
Contact
Pro,�ect Name Cooking GrilVOven Type Unassigned
-- ---- — -- -- -- --------
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description �
Food is offered and sold at Brookview Golf Course.The Cooking GrilUOven has had many repairs and needs to be replaced.
Justification
This giWoven has had many repairs and needs to be replaced.This grilUoven was purchased in 1987.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicies/Fumishings 10,000 10,000
TOtal 10,000 10,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 10,000 10,000
TOtal 10,000 10,000
Page 67
Project# GC-021 Department Golf Course
Contact
Project Name Freezer/Walk in Cooler Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
The Freezer/Walk-in Cooler is a necessary appliance to serve food at the Brookview Grill.
Justification
The existing freezer/walk-in cooler needs to be replaced.
Expenditures Z012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 25,000 25,000
Tota1 25,000 25,000
- - - -- —--- Department Golf Course
Pro,ject# GC-023 Contact
Pro,ject Name Bridge Approach Improvement Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
Improve the approaches to certain bridges on the Golf Cowse.
�Justification
Improvement to the a�thetics and safety of bridge approaches.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 30,000 30,000 60,000
Total �o,000 ao,000 so,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 30,000 30,000 60,000
TotSl 30,000 30,000 60,000
Page 68
Pro,ject# GC-024 Department Golf Course
Contact
Project Name Hole#14 Renovation Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description � 1
Improve Hole#14 flooding issues.
711SC1fiC2t'lOri
Renovation to Hole#14 flooding issues.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements � 50,000 50,000
Total 50,000 50,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 50,000 50,000
Total 50,000 so,000
P%ject# (iC-OZ$ Department Golf Course
Contact
Pro,ject Name Verticuts for Fairway Mower TyPe Unassigned
-- ---- — ___- - ----...- — -
Useful Life
Category Unassigaed
Priority
Descriptioa �
Verticut attachment for the Fairway Mowers to allow thatching of the fa'vways.
Jusrificarion
IFairways need to be groomed to help assist with play.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicleslFumishings 6,000 6,000
Total s,aoo s,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 6,000 6,000
Total s,000 6,000
Page 69
Project# GC-026 Department Golf Course
Contact
rro�ecr Name Irrigation System Upgrade Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Computers
Priority
Description —�
__ — ----- ---------- -
1'he imgation system needs an upgrade to the hardware that runs the system.
�Justification
Properly run irrigation system helps maintain gceens,fainvays,and tee boxes. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 8,000 . 8,000
Total s,000 s,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 8,000 8,000
'rp�j 8,000 8,000
P%ject# GC-OZ7 Department Golf Course
Contact
Pro,ject Name �dio Equipment Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment:Miscellaneous
Priority
�Description
Federal Communications Commission is reyuiring govemmenal units to cease use of the frequency that allows for communication.Along with employee contact
this equioment will also run the irrigation zones.
- --- _ - - ---
Justificarion �
---
Supervisors need a system to communicate to their employees throughout the day due to workload and weather conditions.Radio equipment will need to be
— �
provided that will allow monitoring. ___
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 7,000 7,000
Total 7,000 7,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Brookview Golf Course Fund 7,000 7,000
Tota1 �,000 �,000
Page 70
city of
olden
g
va e
Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016
Storm Sewer Section
This section includes the storm water infrastructure improvements and the flood damage reduction
program for the next five years. Most of these improvements, which include both rate control and
water quality projects, coincide with the Pavement Management Program (see section on Streets).
Improvements will be funded either through the use of current reserves or the issuance of revenue
bonds. The goal is to have enough reserves to account for 50% of the current revenues.
71
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Capital Imp�ovement Plan
2012 thru 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewers
Residendal Storm Sewer Improvements SS-01 Na 800,000 9,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000
Street Sweeper SS-04 Na 150,000 15D,000
Street Sweeper SS-05 n/a 150,000 150,000
Lakeview Park Water Quality Improvements SS-10 Na 150,000 150,000
Brookview Golf Course-Buffer Zone Study SS-12 n/a 30,000 250,000 280,000
Bassett Creek Stream Bank Stabilization SS-20 Na 730,200 730,200
Pickup Truck(Storm Water Utility) SS-22 n/a 26,000 26,000
Storm Water Pand Dredging SS-23 Na 280,000 175,000 455,000
10th Avenue Nortli Culvert Repairs SS-24 nla 185,000 185,000
V-Box Sander(single) SS-26 n/a 40,000 40,000
DeCola Ponds Storm Water Study SS-28 Na 100,000 100,000
Sweeney Lake OuUet Structure SS-29 n/a 250,000 250,000
Wirth Lake OuUet Structure SS-30 n/a 250,000 250,000
Winch Mounted on Heavy Equipment SS-31 nla 20,000 20,000
Anti-Icing Brine Production Room and Equipment SS-32 nla 65,000 65,000
Sump Manhole Retrofits SS-33 nla 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 300,000
Flag Avenue Drainage Study SS-35 n/a 35,000 35,000
Bassett Creek Ponding Areas SS-36 Na 285,000 1,300,000 1,585,000
Storm Sewers Total 2,376,200 1,525,000 2,125,000 2,610,000 1,335,000 9,971,200
Bassetl Creek Watershed M�mt Cohun 1,080,200 285,000 1,300,000 2,665,200
Storna Sewer Ut�lit�Fund(7300) 1,296,000 1,340,000 9,840,000 1,310,000 1,335,000 7,121,000
Unlon Paci/�c Rallroad 185,000 185,000
Storm Sewers Total 2,376,200 1,525,000 2,725,000 2,670,000 7,335,000 9,971,200
Grand Total 2,376,200 1,525,000 2,125,000 2,610,000 1,335,000 9,971,200
Page 72
Project# SS-OI Department Storm Sewers
Contact
r�o�ect rtame Residential Storm Sewer Improvements Type Improvement
---- -- --- -- -..
Useful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
Description �
Construction and repair of storm sewer system in conjunction with the Pavement Management Program(see S#1).. ___ �
Justification �
Provide an improved storm water runoff drainage system in conjunction with the Pavement Management Program to facilitate surface water runoff,minimize local
drainage and flooding issues and protect pavement.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Inftastructure Improvements 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000
Total 800,000 1,100,000 7,700,OD0 1,100,000 7,100,000 5,200,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000
Tot31 800,000 1,100,000 7,700,000 1,700,000 7,700,000 5,200,000
Project# ss-O4 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Project Name Street Swee er
�1 Type Equipment
-- --- ---
— —-- -
Useful Life
Category Stortn Sewer
Priority
Description �
- __ _ _._ ._.. _
New street sweeper to replace Unit#504,2006 Elgin Sweeper.
Justification �
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 504,which will be eight years old.
__ __-- —
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 150,000 150,000
Total 150,000 750,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 150,000 150,000
Total 150,000 150,000
Page 73
Project# SS-OS Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Project Name Street Sweeper Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Stonn Sewer
Priority
Description
New street sweeper to replace Unit#505,2006 Elgin Sweeper. �
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#505,which will be nine years old.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 150,000 150,000
TOtal 150,000 150,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 150,000 150,000
Total 150,000 150,000
Project# SS-lO Department Stotm Sewers
Contact
rro�e�c Name Lakeview Park Water Quality Improvements Type Improvement
__- — --- ---
Useful Life
Category Stonn Sewer
Priority
Description �
Water quality improvements in Lakeview Park to improve water quality in Medicine Lake.The scope of this project is to be determined during preliminary project
design.
Justification
To reduce nutnents and sediment from storm water runoff in the Lakeview Heights area that drains to Medicine Lake.This project will be consistent with the
Medicine Lake Total Maximin Daily Load(TMDL)Implementation Plan. -�
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 150,000 150,000
Total 750,000 150,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 150,000 150,000
TOtal 750,000 150,000
Page 74
Project# SS-12 Department Stonn Sewers
Contact
Project Name Brookview Golf Course-Buffer Zone Study Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
Description �
Perform a study in 2013 to idenNfy locations for the development of native vegetation buffer areas in Brookview Golf Course.Construction of the buffer areas in
2014.
Justification
Removal of nutrients and sediment from stormwater runoff entering golf course ponds and Bassett Creek.
� — -- —
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 30,000 250,000 280,000
TOt21 30,000 250,000 280,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 30,000 250,000 280,000
Tota1 30,000 250,000 280,000
Project# SS-20 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Pro,ject Name Bassett Creek Stream Bank Stabilization Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category Stotm Sewer
Priority
Description �
Stabilize banks along sub reaches of Bassett Creek Main Stem.Need is based on the Bassett Creek Inventory which was completed in 2001 and is updated on an
annual basis.
2012: Main Stem(Between Duluth Street and 26th Avenue)-Subreach 2
Justification 1
The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission has additional funding for stabilization of the stream banks thorughout the watershed.Based upon the
availability of funding the Commission has added the portion of Bassett Creek in Golden Valley between TH 169 and the north City Limits just north of Westbrook
, Road.The project funding is available beginning in 2011 and 2012.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 730,200 730,200
TOtal 730,200 730,200
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Bassett Creek Watershed Mg 580,200 580,200
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 150,000 150,000
TOtal 730,200 730,200
Page 75
Project# SS-22 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
rro�ect Name pickup Truck(Storm Water Utility) Type Ec{uipment
Useful Life
Category Vehicles
Priority
Description
One half ton pickup truck for the Storm Water Management and other environmental activities to replace Unit#501(2000 Ford F-150). �
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#501,which will be twelve years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 26,000 26,000
Total 26,000 26,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 26,000 26,000
Tota1 26,000 26,000
---- — -----_- ------- -
Project# SS-23 Department SWmi Sewers
Contact
Project Name Storm Water Pond Dredging Type Maintenance
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
Conrinuation of the pond dredging pmgracri for 2014 and 2016.1'he following ponds are proposed for each year:
2014
Medicine Lake Road between Rhode Island and Nevada Avenue
Golden Ridge Pond at Naper Avenue and Gettysburg Court
Perpich Center West Pond
Bassett Creek Park Pond
2016
Hidden Lakes Pond 2B
Golden Meadows
----- - --- -
--- - --- -- -
Justification �
- ---- — -- — __ _--- —�
Dredge existing waYer quality ponds to remove accumulaYed sediment and restore nutrient and sediment removal efficiency.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 280,000 175,000 455,000
Total 280,000 175,000 455,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 280,000 175,000 455,000
Total 280,000 175,000 455,000
Page 76
P%ject# SS-24 Department Stom�Sewers
Contact
Pro,ject Name lOth Avenue North Culvert Repairs Type Improvement
-- - ------------ — -- --- --
Useful Life
Category Stom�Sewer
Priority
Description
Repair Culverts that convey Bassett Creek under lOth Avenue North and the Union Pacific Railroad. �
JUSL1�C31;lOII
These culverts are technically classified as a bridge by the Minnesota Depaztrnent of Transportation and are inspected regularly.The last inspecrion identified high
level conosion of the culverts at the base flow level.Although not a high risk for collapse,the corrosion needs to be addressed soon.These culverts aze owned by the
railroad.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 185,000 185,000
Tota1 185,000 185,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Union Pacific Railroad 185,000 185,000
Total 185,000 785,000
Project# SS-26 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Pro,ject Name �1-Bog Sander(single) Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
Description ]
�V-Box sander with hook frame for the single axle dump truck#778.
Justification
V-Box sanders are the most efficient and cost effective way to apply the de-icing chemicals for winter operations.V-Box sanders will reduce the impacts of de-icing
chemicals on local lakes and streams.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 40,000 40,000
Total 40,000 a0,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 40,000 40,000
Total 40,000 40,000
Page 77
Project# SS-2g Department Storm Sewers
Contact
rro�ecc Name DeCola Ponds Storm Water Study Type Improvement
Useful Life
� Category Storm Sewer
Priority
Description �
Perfonn a Hydrologic,Hydraulic,and Flood Mitigation Study of the DeCola Ponds subwatershed,located in the north central portion of the City.This study will
develop the storm water runoff models for this azea,including inflows&om New Hope and Crystal,and will investigate storm water management strategies for the
Winnetka Ave and Medicine Lake Road intersection and residenfial areas around the DeCola Ponds.
Additional study is needed in 2012 to furtt►er identify measures to mitigate flood damage at Decola Ponds and the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue areas.
1'his study will examine future land uses,retrofitting existing land uses,struchual floodproofing and other measures to reduce and mitigate flooding impacts.
Justification
------- -- --- -
IThis study wili give information to proceed to make appropriate improvements. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Planning/Design 100,000 100,000
Total 100,000 100,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 100,000 100,000
Total 100,000 100,000
Project# $5-29 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Project Name Sweeney Lake Outlet Structure Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category Stoan Sewer
Priority
Description
Reconstruction of the outlet structure from Sweeney Lake to a permanent weir. �
Justificarion �
— _--- -- ------- -_
Based upon a request by the City of Golden Valley,the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission has included the reconswction of the Sweeney Lake
outlet in its CIP.The current structure is hand placed concrete that is subject to modification and erosion around each end ofthe structure.The new structure will
include engineering cut offwalls to prevent flow azound the ends of and under the structure,greatly reducing the threat of erosion.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 250,000 250,000
Total 250,000 250,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Bassett Creek Watershed Mg 250,000 250,000
Total 2��a� 250,000
Page 78
Project# SS-3� Department Stom►Sewers
Contact
Project Name wirth Lake Outlet Structure Type Unassigned
-- - --— — --- _ Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description �
Reconstruction of the oudet swcture from Wirth Lake to prevent high water backflow from Bassett Creek from entering the lake. �
Justification
The Total Maximum Daily Load Study for Wirth Lake identified the backflow of flood waters from the Bassett Creek into Wirth Lake as the primary phosphorus
load to the lake,resulNng in failure to achieve water quality goals.A backflow prevention device was identified as part of the study and has been included in tt►e
Bassett Creek Water Management Commission CIP.The City of Golden Valley will be the lead agency in implementing this project.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 250,000 250,000
Total z5o,0ou 250,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Bassett Creek Watershed Mg 250,OW 250,000
Total 250,000 250,000
-------- ----- ----..
- - - --- -----_ ___ _ .
Project# SS-31 Department Stom►Sewers
Contact
Project Name winch Mounted on Heavy Equipment Type Unassig►ed
- —-- _ _ __---- —_ -
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priorily
Description
A winch that mounts on heavy equipment for storm tree damage removal from Bassett Creek.
Justification- l - – —
Downed tress obstruct the flow in Bassett Creek creating flooding situations and require removal from the creek to establish flows.
Eapenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 20,000 20,000
Total 20,000 20,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 20,000 20,000
Total 20,000 20,000
Page 79
Project# SS-3Z-- --- ----------- Department StormSewers
Contact
rro;e�c Name Anti-Icing Brine Production Room and Equipment Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
�Description
Construct a room at the lOth Ave storage to house brine production equipment and storage tanks. —�
Justification
Anti-icing brine production for reducing anti-icing/de-icing chemical application on city streets to reduce the impacts of de-icing chemicals in our creeks,lakes and
wetlands.
The brine production equipment was obtained at no cost from another city.This community replaced and upgraded their equipment to increase de-icing capacity.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 65,000 65,000
Tota1 s5,000 65,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 65,000 65,000
Tota1 s5,000 65,000
Project# SS-33 neparnneor Stortn Sewers
Confact
ProjectName Sump Manhole Retrofts Type Improvement
------ --
Useful Life
Category Stortn Sewer
Priority
Description
Installation of baftles to increase the removal efficiency of existing sump manholes in the storm sewer system. —�
Justification
Manhole and catch basin baftles will improve the removal efficiencies for suspended solids and phosphorus.Installation priorities will be in the Sweeney Lake and
Medicine Lake sub-watersheds,where 1'MDL studies haue been completed and approved.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 300,000
Total 60,000 60,000 60,000 fi0,0U0 60,000 300,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 300,000
Tota1 so,000 so,000 so,000 so,000 so,000 soo,000
Page 80
Project# SS-35 Department Storm Sewers
Contact
rro�ecr Name Flag Avenue Drainage Study Type unassignea
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Descriprion
Preparation of a drainage study in the vacinity of Flag Avenue between Earl Street and Duluth Street.
Justification
This study will address surface water runoff and ground water issues prior to the scheduled 2015 Pavement Management Program. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 35,000 35,000
Total s5,000 35,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Storm Sewer Utility Fund(730 35,000 35,000
Total 35,000 35,000
Project# SS-3G Department Storm Sewers
Contact
Project Name Bassett Creek Ponding Areas Type lmprovement
Useful Life
Category Storm Sewer
Priority
Description �
Improvements on the Bassett Creek Watershed Area in Golden Valley.
Justification
The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission's Capital Improvement Program includes construction of water quality and rate control ponds adjacent to
the main stem of Bassett Cr�k in 2014 and 2015.The BCWMC funding includes preparation of a feasibility report and construction of these ponds.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 285,000 1,300,000 1,585,000
Total 285,000 1,300,000 1,585,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Bassett Creek Watershed Mg 285,000 1,300,000 1,585,000
TOt81 285,000 1,300,000 1,585,000
Page 81
city of
olden
va e
Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016
Water and Sanitary Sewer Utility Section �
A five-year projection of the Water and Sanitary Sewer Fund reveals some potential financial
challenges the City may have to address. The contract pricing with the City of Minneapolis and
Golden Valley-Crystal-New Hope Joint Water Commission is up for renewal in 2013. The
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) surcharge program related to inflow and
infiltration will have a direct affect on rates as it requires the City to make improvements to the
sanitary system that will reduce the rate of inflow and infiltration into the system.
Fees from the City's utility bill are the main source of revenue.
82
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Capital Imp�ove�nent Plan
2012 tt►ru 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Systems
Sanitary Sewer&Water Line RepaidRecon. W&SS-001 n/a 400,000 1,100,000 1,100,o00 1,100,000 1,100,000 4,800,000
Inflow/lnfiltration Study and Improvements WBSS-002 Na 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000
Toro Dingo with Attachments W&SS-006 n/a 45,000 45,000
Pickup Truck WBSS-014 n/a 30,000 30,000
Utility Building Flooring Upgrade/Replacement W&SS-032 n/a 50,000 50,000
PickupNtility Truck W&SS-035 Na 45,000 45,000
PidcupNtility Truck W&SS-U37 Na 40,000 40,000
Sidewalk Sweeper WB�SS-U44 n/a 15,000 15,000
Air Compressor Mounted on Trailer W&SS-047 Na 25,000 25,000
Televising Equipment W&SS-053 nla 24,000 50,000 74,000
Trailer WB�SS-054 Na 12,000 12,000
RubberTired Excavator W&SS-056 nla 225,000 225,000
Harold and Rhode Island Reconstruction WS�SS-057 n/a 500,000 500,000
Work Stations WB�SS-059 nla 20,000 20,000
Step Van WBSS-060 n/a 45,000 45,000
Pickup Utility Truck W&SS-061 nla 55,000 55,000
Pickup Truck W&SS-062 n/a 85,000 85,000
Radio Meter Reading System WBSS-063 n/a 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
Water&Sewer Systems Total 7,391,000 1,485,000 1,445,000 7,675,000 1,470,000 7,466,000
Water&Sewer UnlitV Fund 1,391,000 1,485,000 1,445,000 1,675,000 1,470,000 7,466,000
Water&Sewer Systems Total 1,397,000 1,485,000 1,445,000 1,675,040 1,470,000 7,466,000
Grand Total 1,391,000 1,485,000 7,445,000 7,675,000 1,470,000 7,466,000
Page 83
Project# w&SS-001 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name Sanitary 5ewer&Water Line Repair/Recon. Type unassignea
----- — ----- --- --— Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
�Description �
Major repairs and reconstruction on the City's sanitary sewer and water systems as needed. Repairs will be done in conjunction with the City's Pavement �
Management Program(See S#1).
Jli3L1$C1hOII
To maintain City's water mains and sanitary sewer mains. 1
Egpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 400,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 4,800,000
TOtal 400,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 9,100,000 9,700,000 4,800,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 400,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 , 1,100,000 1,100,000 4,800,000
Total 400,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,700,000 1,100,000 4,800,000
Project# WBiss-�OZ Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
r�o�ect Name Inflow/Infdtration Study and Improvements Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description �
Results of an enginnering study in 2005 and 2006 identified the sources of clear water inflow and infiltration(I&n into the cities and the Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services(MCES)sanitary sewer systems.Beginning in 2006,the sources identified in the study will be addressed.
J119t1f1CSllOII �
Consistent with the MCES requirements that the City's I&I problems must be addressed to avoid the surcharge and pending demand charge from the MCES.In �
2013,unaddressed flows were to built into the rates from MCES but will now be used for rehabiliation of the system. J
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Inftastructure Improvements 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 9,000,000
Total 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water 8�Sewer Utility Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000
Tota1 2oo,aoo 200,00o zoo,000 2oo,aoo 2ao,000 �,000,000
Page 84
Project# WBLSS-OOG Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name TOTO D'lugo wlth AttaChmellts Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description
Toro Dingo walk behind skid steer loader for removal of snow from the City Hall complex sidewalks. Dingo will be purchased with snow blower and sweeper
attachments. The Dingo can also be used as a stump grinder,post hole auger,trencher etc.This unit was purchased in 2006 and is unit 676.
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Gravely sidewalk machines. Gravely no longer produces the sidewalk machines currently used by the City. The
Dingo's multi-use makes it the machine best suited to replace the Gravely machines. The Dingo will be utilized yeaz-round as a skid steer loader and with the
rentaVpurchase of additional attachments,it will be utilized as a multi-task piece of equipment.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 45,000 45,000
Total a5,000 45,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 45,000 45,000
Total 45,000 45,000
--- —---- --- - -- -- - - -
Pro,ject# W&SS-014 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Pro,ject Name p1Cku Truck
p Type Unassigned
-------- --—
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description _�
- - —- - ---- —
PickupNtility truck for fihe Utility Department to replace Unit 681,a 2008 Ford F-150 Pickup. 1
Justification
- --- ---- --- --- __ - ---__ —
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit 681.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 30,000 30,000
Tot81 30,000 30,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water 8�Sewer Utility Fund 30,000 30,000
Total 30,000 30,000
Page 85
Pro�ect# w$tiss-�32 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name Utility Building Flooring Upgrade/Replacement Type Unassig►ed
-— ____—_ _-----. —._.
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
�Description
Utility Building tile flooring in the main roll call room,restroom,offices,kitchen,steps and entry. �
Justification
Utility Building flooring withstands heary abuse&om employee tracking and has exceeded its life cycle. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 50,000 50,000
Total so,000 so,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 50,000 50,000
Total 50,000 50,000
Pro,ject# WBzSS-035 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Pro,ject Name piCkup/Utlllty T1'uck Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description �
Pickup/Utility truck for the Utility Department to replace Unit#673,a 2002 Ford F-150 pickup. 1
Justification ---�
Increased repair and maintenance on Unit#673,which will be ten years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 45,000 45,000
Total 45,000 45,000
Funding Sources ZO12 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 45,000 45,000
Tota1 45,000 45,000
Page 86
Project# w8tss-�37 Department WaYer&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name piCkup/Utility TruCk Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category WaYer and Sewer
Priority
Description —�
Pickup/Utility truck for the Utility Deparhnent to replace Unit#677,a 2006 Ford F-350 Utility truck.
Justification
Ilncreased repair and maintenance on Unit#677. _ __ _ �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 40,000 40,000
Tota1 ao,000 ao,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 40,000 40,000
Tota1 40,000 40,000
Pro,ject# w&SS-044 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Pro,ject Name 5idewalk Sweeper Type unassignea
__
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description �
----- - - ----- - ----
Gravely sidewalk sweeper for complex snow removal and various sweeping duties. _ _
Justification -----�
Increased repa'v and maintenance expenditures on Unit 663,a 1998 Gravely sidewalk machine.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 15,000 15,000
Z'p� 15,000 15,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water 8�Sewer Utility Fund 15,000 15,000
TOt31 15,000 75,000
Page 87
Project# WBiSS-O47 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name �r Compressor Mounted on Trailer Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description �
Air compressor on trailer to replace Unit 662,1997 Ingersol Rand.
Justification —I
Increase repair and maintenance expendihues on Unit 662,which will be I S years old.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 25,000 25,000
Tot31 25,000 25,000
Deparlment Water&Sewer Systems
project# W&SS-053
Contact
Project Name Televising Equipment Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description �
Sewer televising camera and transporter for televising sewer mainlines.Main Line Televising equipment to replace equipment purcHased with truck#680.The
equipment will be four years old and the computer software will be not compatible. _ _]
Justification �
- - --- -- ___—--- -- —
The equipment will be four years old and the computer soflware will be outdated.In 2016,all equipment will need to be replaced..
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 24,000 50,000 74,000
Total 24,000 50,000 74,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 ZO15 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 24,000 50,000 74,000
Z'p�j 24,000 50,000 74,000
Page 88
Project# W&SS-054 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Pro,ject Name Tl'�i]ep Type Equipment
--- -- — - -- ---- — -
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description �
Trailer to haul trench box for water main breaks.This is one of two trailers.
Justification
This would replace Unit#652 thaY will be 21 years old.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 12,000 12,000
TOtSI 12,000 12,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 12,000 12,000
Total 12,000 12,000
project# W&5S-056
Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
rro�ect rtame Rubber Tired Egcavator T
ype Equipment
Useful Life 15 years
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description
Rubbet tired excavator to replace Unit#671,which will be 15 years old. �
fUSt1F1CSllOri �
Increased repair and maintenance on Unit#671,a tractor backhoe that will be 15 years old.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 225,000 225,000
Total 225,000 225,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 225,000 225,000
Total 225,000 225,000
Page 89
Project# w8iss-�57 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name garold and Rhode Island Reconstruction Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
Major repairs and reconslruction on the City's sanitary sewer and water systems as needed.Repair will be done in conjunction with the City's Pavement �
Management Program on Harold Avenue.This project is in addition to the 2012 PMP project area.
7USt1fiCSt10II
To maintain City's water mains and sanitary sewer mains.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 500,000 500,000
Total 500,000 500,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 500,000 500,000
Tota.l 500,000 500,000
Project# w8tss-059 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name work Stations Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description �
Ergonomically wrrect work stations to replace olde style desks that were purchased prior to computers.
Justification
Utility work station replacements due to age and ergonomics.This would include four workstations.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 20,000 20,000
Total 20,000 20,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 20,000 20,000
Tota.l 20,000 20,000
Page 90
Project# W$tiss-�(0 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name Step Van Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
Step Van for the Utility Deparlment to replace Unit#674,a 2002 Work Horse Step Van.
Justification
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#674.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 45,000 45,000
Tota1 45,000 45,000
�nding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water&Sewer Utility Fund 45,000 45,000
Total 45,000 45,000
Pro,ject# W&SS-061 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Cootact
Project Name pickup Utility T1'uCk Type Unassigned
——- -- — _ --— Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
�Description �
Utility Truck to replace Unit#677,a 2006 Ford F-350 4 X4 with utility box.
Justification --- --- - --
--- --_------ ----- —
Increased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#677. _ _ _
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 55,000 55,000
Tota1 55,000 55,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water 8�Sewer Utility Fund 55,000 55,000
TOt31 55,000 55,000
Page 91
Project# w&SS-062 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Pro,ject Name piCkup Tl'uCk Type Equipment
-- --— --------- -
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description �
Pickup Truck for the Utility Department to replace Unit#683,a 2008 F-350 4X4 with utility box,large crane hoist and plow.Unit#683 will be transferred to
Vehicle Maintenance.
7113t1fiC8'110II
�lncreased repair and maintenance expenditures on Unit#683. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 85,000 85,000
Total 85,000 85,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water 8�Sewer Utility Fund 85,000 85,000
Tota1 85,000 85,000
Project# W&SS-063 Department Water&Sewer Systems
Contact
Project Name g�dio Meter Reading System Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Water and Sewer
Priority
Description
�Fixed base radio metering reading system.
Justification
Existing FCC radio frequency utilized for reading city water meters has been banned by the FCC and city is forced to comply with the rule changes.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Fumishings 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
Total 100,000 700,000 100,000 700,000 400,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Water 8�Sewer Utility Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
TOt31 700,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
Page 92
city of
olden
g
va e
Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016
Streets Section
The City of Golden Valley has over 120 miles of streets. The city is responsible for 90 miles of local
streets. Municipal State Aid streets account for the remainder or 30 miles. As streets deteriorate,
roads need to be reconstructed or repaired.
The City's Pavement Management Program has outlined all roads to be reconstructed by the year
2015. The bond payments on the debt will go until 2036. This plan has been included in the five year
program.
The revenue sources are city-wide street reconstruction debt levy, state aid debt, benefiting properiy
owner assessments and Municipal State Aid Allotments.
93
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Capital Imp�ovement Plan
2012 tt�ru 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Streets
PavementManagementProgram S-001 Na 1,600,000 3,836,000 4,171,000 5,092,000 4,500,000 19,199,000
Pavement Management Ovedays S-013 nla 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000
Count Down P�estrian Signals S-016 n/a 25,000 25,000
Municipal State Aid(MSA)Street Maintenance S-017 nla 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
City Hall Campus Sidewalk Renovation S-018 n/a 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000
MSA Debt Service S-019 Na 189,000 189,000 189,000 191,000 192,000 950,000
Reconstruct New Railroad Crossings S-023 Na 20,000. 28,000 48,000
Replacement of Street Signs S-024 nla 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Winnetka Ave and TH 55 Improvements S-025 nla 1,300,000 1,300,000
Reconstru�tion of Harold Ave and Rhode Island Ave S-029 n/a 1,500,000 1,500,000
Sidewalk and Trail System Upgrades S-030 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
AutoCADApplication 5-032 n/a 11,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 56,000
Streets Tota1 5,420,200 4,839,200 5,146,200 6,069,200 5,403,200 26,878,000
Capttallmprovement Fund(6100) 186200 186,200 186,200 186,200 111,200 856,000
MN DOT 702,000 702,000
Mun�'cBpal S'tate Add(MSA-5100) 2,798,000 317,000 289,000 291,OD0 292,000 3,987,000
Special Assessme�at Bonds 1,600,000 3,836,000 4,171,000 5,092,000 4,500,000 19,199,000
StreetlmprovementFund 134,000 500,000 500,d00 500,000 500;000 2,134,000
Streets Total 5,420,200 4,839,200 5,146,200 6,069,200 5,403,200 26,878,000
Giand Total 5,420,200 4,839,200 5,146,200 6,069,200 5,403,200 26,878,000
Page 94
Project# 5-001 Department st�eers
Contact
Project Name pavement Management Program Type Improvement
--- --
- — — - Useful Life
Category Street Construction
Priority
�Description �
On-going program to upgrade the quality of all of the City's non-MSA residential streets to City standards with adequate drainage.Rehabilitation will involve either
reconsiruction or overlays.The method selected will depend on the quality of the individual street surfaces,the sub grade and the uNlity work required.
Justification
Provide a high quality street system in a long term cost effective manner in accordance with the Pavement Management Policy.The 2012 feasibility study was
prepared with the 2011 PMP.
2012-1.2 miles
2013-2.2 miles
2014-23 miles
2015-2.5 miles
2016-2.6 miles
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 1,600,000 3,836,000 4,171,000 5,092,000 4,500,000 19,199,000
Z'p� 9,600,000 3,836,000 4,171,000 5,092,000 4,500,000 19,199,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Special Assessment Bonds 1,600,000 3,836,000 4,171,000 5,092,000 4,500,000 19,199,000
TOte.l 1,600,000 3,836,000 4,171,000 5,092,000 4,500,000 19,199,000
Page 95
Project# 5-013 Department sve�
Contact
Project Name pavement Management Overlays Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Street Construction
Priority
Description
Includes mill and overlays of local and State Aid streets that are constructed to City standards to maintain streets to their pmjected life-spans. The projects include
localized replacement of curb and gutter as needed.
2012: Wesrivood Drive:Ravine Trail to Glenwood Avenue
W�stwood Lane:End of Street to Weshwood Drive
Strawberry Lane:Cul-de-sac to Westwood Drive
Maddus Lar►e:Westwood Drive to Glenwood Avenue
Mendelssohn Avenue:Golden Valley Road to Plymouth Avenue
Golden Valley Road:Mendelssohn Avenue to Decatur Avenue
Meadow Lane:Trunk Highway 55 to Cul-de-sac
North 1'H 55 Frontage:West of Meadow Iane to Meadow Lane
Dahlberg Drive:TH 55 to Meadow Lane
2013 Wisconsin Ave:TH55 to lOth Avenue North
Golden Valley Road:Boone Avenue to Wisconsin Avenue
Zenith Avenue:Golden Valley Road to 26th Avenue North
Rhode Island Avenue North:23rd Avenue North to Medicine Lake Road
23rd Avenue North:Winnetka Avenue to Rhode Island Avenue North
2014: To be determined
2015: To be determined
2016: To be determined
rJustification
Provides high quality street system in a long term cost effective manner in accordance with the Payement Management Policy.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000
Ta� �oo,000 5ou,000 �ou,000 soo,000 �oo,aoo z,soo,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Municipal State Aid(MSA-51 366,000 366,000
Street Improvement Fund 134,000 500,000 500,000 500,OOD 500,OOD 2,134,000
Tota1 soo,oao soo,000 �oo,000 soo,000 �oo,000 z,�oo,000
Page 96
Project# 5-016 Department Sireets
Contact
rro�ect rtame Count Down Pedestrian Signals Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Street Construction
Priority
Description �
Installation of count-down pedesirian signals at traffic signals in the City.This is a five yeaz progam beginning with the eight signals in the downwwn azea
Justification
Count down signals haue been shown to be safer and more understandable method of providing pedestrians information about the time available to cross sigaalized
intersections.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Municipal State Aid(MSA-51 25,000 25,000
Total 25,000 25,000
Pro,ject# 5-017 Department streets
Contact
r�o�e�t Name Municipal State Aid(MSA)Street Maintenance Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
Allotment of a portion of the City's annual Municipal State Aid construction funds to be used for maintenance of designaYed State Aid routes,including maferials
and salaries.
--------
--- -- --
Justification ------ _�
---
- ------- - -
Maintenance of Municipal Stafe Aid street system. ___ _
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
TOtcil 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Tatal
Municipal State Aid(MSA-51 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
TOtal 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
Page 97
Pro,ject# S-01S Department Streets
Contact
Project Name City Hall Campus Sidewalk Renovation Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Street Construction
Priority
Descriptioa �
This project will perform a comprehensive analysis of the Winnetka Avenue Streetscape and sidewalks,as well as the City Hall campus.l'his analysis will
investigate potential ADA compliance issu�s such as pedestrian ramps,and sidewalk cracking.The study will determine the remaining functional life of all
landscaping and streetscape materials,determine the estimated costs for rehabiliitation and/or replacement and provide a prioritized schedules for rehabiilitation.
Justification
Maintenance of existing streetscape materials and pedestrian facilities to provide compliance with ADA requirements and provide an acceptable environment in a
cost effective manner.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 75,000 � 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000
Total 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Capital Improvement Fund(61 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000
Total 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000
Project# S-019 Department Streets
Contact
Project Name MSA Debt Service Type Unassigned
- -- - _ ----- - - -
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
Debt Service payment on Municipal State Aid Bonds ending in 2028.
--- - ------- - ------
-- ---
---
Justification
-- - -- ----- ---- �
Necessary funding for Staie Aid roads to construct projects needed for safety.
Ezpenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 189,000 189,000 189,000 191,000 192,000 950,000
Total 189,000 189,000 189,000 191,000 192,000 950,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Municipal State Aid(MSA-51 189,000 189,000 189,000 191,000 192,000 950,000
TOtal 789,000 189,000 189,000 191,000 792,000 950,000
Page 98
Project# 5-023 Department Sireets
Contact
rro�ect Name Reconstruct New Railroad Crossings Type Lnprovement
Useful Life
Category Street ConstrucNon
Priority
Description
Reconstruct euisting substandard railroad crossings with concrete crossing.
2012-Pennsylvania Avenue North(north of Golden Valley Road)
2013 Florida Avenue South(south of Laurel Avenue)
Justificarion
Lxisting substandazd crossings,construction of rubber and timbers,can no longer be patched._ _ _ _ �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 20,000 28,000 48,000
Total 20,000 2e,000 as,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Municipal State Aid(MSA-51 20,000 28,000 48,000
Total 20,000 28,000 48,000
Project# 5-024 Department Streets
Contact
r�o�ecc Name Replacement of Street Signs Type Unassigned
-- ----- ---- ---- -
Useful Life
Category Unassigted
Priority
Description
ADA requirements for public rights-of-way require that a plan be adopted to maintain minimum reflectivity and visibility standazds be adopted for all street name
and traffic control signs.This inclucles replacement of all street name signs that are not replaced with PMP projects.
First year of tt►e project(2010)includes purchase of equipment to determine sign reflectivity,gather data and implement a data base and management plan.
Following years include inventory of all signs and start replacement of non-compliant signs.
Justificarion
Compliance with Federal ADA requirements.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
EquipNehicles/Furnishings 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Tota1 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Capital Improvement Fund(61 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Page 99
Project# S-O25 Department Streets
Contact
Project Name winnetka Ave and TH 55 Improvements Ty� unassignea
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
The intersection of Winnetka Avenue and Trunk Highway 55 currently experiences significant delays for northbound traffic during the PM Peak hours.The addition
of a new northbound to westbound tum lane,other lane modifications and signal modifications will reduce the overall delays eacperienced.
�J113t1f1CSt10II
IReduction in overall intersection delay and reduction of congestion. _ _
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
ConstructionlMaintenance 1,300,000 1,300,000
Total 7,300,000 1,300,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
MN DOT 702,000 702,000
Municipal State Aid(MSA-51 598,000 598,000
Total 1,300,000 1,300,000
Pro,ject# 5-029 Department stre�
Contact
Pro,ject Name Reconstruction of Harold Ave and Rhode Island Ave Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category SVeet Consiruction
Priority
Description �
Reconstruction of Hazold Avenue between Winnetka and Glenwood Avenues to current Municipal State Aid standards and Rhode Island Avenue north of Harold
Avenue to current City standards.
Justification
---- ---------_----- -- -- ---------
Upgrade roadway to current Municipal State Aid and City standards consistent with the Pavement Management Policy. _
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Infrastructure Improvements 1,500,000 1,500,000
Total 1,500,000 1,500,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Municipal State Aid(MSA-51 1,500,000 1,500,000
Total 1,500,000 1,500,000
Page 100
Project# 5-03� Department Streets
Contact
Project Name Sidewalk and Trail System Upgrades Type Unassigned
--- -- ---- - Useful Life
Category Street Construction
Priority
�escription
Upgrading the deficient portions of the City's sidewallc and trail system to current standards and to be compliant with State and Federal standards for handicap
accessibility.l'his will include the elimination of barriers to access,providing required clearances,installation of stu►dard ramps and pedestrian acrivated push
buttons.This work will be performed in association with oveday projects and as independent projects based upon priorities estabished in the Right of Way
Accessibility Plan.
Justification
Provide an accessible pedestrian system that is compliant with the State and Federal Requirements.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Construction/Maintenance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Total so,oao �o,000 50,000 �o,000 so,aoo 2�0,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Capital Improvement Fund(61 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Tota1 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
- --- __ _ ._ _ -- ---
Pro,ject# 5-�32 Department Streets
Contact
Project Name Auto CAD App6cation Type Unassigned
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority
Description
AutoCAD is a CAD design,drafting,modeling,azchitectural drawing,and engineering software that helps with design and as-built drawings of infrasiructue�
7USt1f1C�lOri �
IThis software is the maintenance and upgrades for software to manage ow street and utility systems. �
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Other 11,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 56,000
Total 17,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 56,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Capital Improvement Fund(61 11,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 56,000
Total 11,200 91,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 56,000
Page 101
city of
olden
va e
Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016
Douglas Drive Corridor Section
The City of Golden Valley initiated a study of the Douglas Drive Corridor that took place in 2008 and
2009. Following that study the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) took initiative to develop
a Redevelopment Plan for the segment of the corridor from Medicine Lake Road to Trunk Highway
55. The City's Comprehensive plan is in conformance with the Redevelopment Plan.
In early 2011, Xcel Energy began collection of the franchise fee ordered by the City Council which will
assist in paying for the City's portion of the project. Hennepin County, MnDOT, Transit for Livable
Communities and the City are working together to fund and complete this study.
102
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota.
Capital Imp�ovement Plan
2012 thru 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Douglas Drive Cooridor
Douglas Drive Improvemen� DD-001 n/a 927,350 1,881,100 875,000 6,474,900 13,169,550 23,327,100
Douglas Drive Cooridor Total 927�350 1,881,100 875,000 6,474,100 93,189,550 23,327,100
Franch�se Fees 610,0� 610,000 610,a00 610,000 610,000 3,050,000.
Hennep�'ia County 1,357,000 9,254,5� 10,691;500;
MNDOT 1,000,000 1,000,000
Sheet Reconstructdon Bonds ' 7,608,250 7;608,25U
Trans�t Ldvable Com�rtundtdes(TLC) 375,000 675,000 7.050,000
�
Douglas Drfve Cooridor Total 985,000 2,285,000 B90,000 9,575,250 9„864,500 23,319,750
Grand TotPil 927,350 1,881,100 875,000 6,474,100 73,169,550 23,327,100
Page 103
Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhYU 2016
Department Douglas Drive Cooridor
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota cao��t
Type Unassigned
Project# DD-001 Useful Life
Project Name Douglas Drive Improvements cate�ory Street Construction
Priority
Desctiption
Reconstruction of Douglas Drive to current standards.Franchise Fees will pay for any internal or external borrowing
needed to fund the project.
Justification �
Reconstruction to current state and county standards to address pedestrian safety and promote multi-model
transportation.This is a cooperative agreement with Hennepin County.
In July 2008,the City officially began a study of the Douglas Dr corridor.The study,funded by a grant awarded by
Tra.nsit for Livable Communities in parhiership with the Federal Highway Administration,and the Minnesota
Department of Transportation,focused on a redesign of Douglas Dr and on establishing a long-term vision for the
corridor.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Land Acquisition 675,000 2,454,000 3,129,000
Construction/Maintenance 1,881,100 13,169,550 15,050,650
Other 252,350 875,000 4,020,100 5,147,450
Total 927,350 1,881,100 875,000 6,474,700 13,169,550 23,327,100
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Franchise Fees 610,000 610,000 610,000 610,000 610,000 3,050,000
Hennepin County 1,357,000 9,254,500 10,611,500
MN DOT 1,000,000 1,000,000
Street Reconstruction Bonds 7,608,250 7,608,250
Transit Livable Communities(T 375,000 675,000 1,050,000
Total 985,000 2,285,000 610,000 9,575,250 9,864,500 23,319,750
Page 104
city of
olden
va e
Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016
Appendix Section
105
Exhibit A
Special Assessment Policy
for
The City of Golden Valley
January 17, 1995
Amended February 21, 1995
Amended June 7, 2005
Amended July 18, 2006
Amended January 20, 2009
General
Minnesota State Law, Chapters 429.010 to 429.11, provides municipalities the ability to
make public improvements such as installation of sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer,
sidewalks, and street improvements (including grading, curb and gutter, surFacing, and
lighting). The procedures that Cities must follow, including reports, notices, and public
hearings, are well defined within the laws.
The Statute allows municipalities to assess all or portions of the costs of any
improvements to property owners based on the benefits received from the project. The
Statute is not specific regarding the determination of benefits to a property, or how to
apportion the costs to the benefiting properties. Rather, the law makes the municipality
responsible for developing an equitable method of cost sharing among the benefiting
property owners.
The purpose of this special assessment policy is to provide a guide, to be used by City
Staff, for preparing assessment rolls for approval by the City Council. This policy is
meant to assure uniform and consistent treatment to all properties within the City as
improvements occur.
The special assessment policy will not cover all possible assessment situations. Special
cases and variations of standard cases that are not specifically discussed under this
policy will be evaluated during preliminary project studies, and assessments will be
determined that do not violate the benefit principles as required by Statute.
No special assessments will be levied against designated floodplains, municipal storm
water ponds or wetland areas on private property as determined by criteria in the
Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 and the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources. The limits of wetlands will be determined by the City on a case-by-case
basis at the time of preliminary project design and feasibility report preparation.
No special assessments will be levied against railroad, county highway or state highway
rights-of-way. Properties fronting County Roads and County Highways will be subject to
special assessments for reconstruction projects based upon this policy.
106
Special assessments levied by the City will include an administrative fee, to be
established annually by ordinance, to finance indirect costs associated with the
assessment that are incurred by the City.
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Assessments
Reconstruction and Repairs
No special assessments will be levied for repair and reconstruction of existing
sanitary sewer and water main systems, except for properties that have not been
previously assessed for these utilities.
For properties not previously assessed that are adjacent to sanitary sewer or
water main reconstruction projects, the amount of special assessments will be
calculated on a case-by-case basis at the time of preliminary design and
feasibility report preparation.
Property owners are responsible for maintenance, repair and replacement of
sanitary sewer services from, and including the connection to the main, and the
building being served. Pavement Management street reconstruction projects will
include an opportunity for property owners to reconstruct or repair their sanitary
sewer services. All costs, including construction, administration and other indirect
costs, will be specially assessed to the property being served by the sanitary
sewer service.
The City is responsible for maintenance, repair and replacement of water
services from the connection to the water main up to and including the curb stop
or valve on the service line. The property owner is responsible for maintenance,
repair and replacement of the water service from the connection of the service
pipe to the valve or curb stop, to the building being served.
New Construction
In instances where property is developing or redeveloping, public sanitary sewer
and water main may need to be installed. The construction of City sanitary
sewer, water mains and storm sewer to serve these properties will be
constructed as public improvement projects, unless the City opts to have the
developer design and construct the improvements. The developer of such
properties will be responsible for the entire cost of public utilities, including
construction, administration and other indirect costs, whether construction is
performed as a City Improvement Project or by the developer.
At the time such a development project is proposed, the Public Works
Department will determine if the project is to be constructed publicly or privately.
If the utility installation is to be constructed privately, the developer will be
responsible for preparing construction plans and specifications consistent with
City standards. These construction plans and specifications must be reviewed
and approved by the Public Works Department. The utility installation must also
be inspected by the Public Works Department during construction. The
developer will be responsible for 100% of the costs of City construction
io�
observation and plan review, which will be billed directly to the developer. Any
unpaid costs incurred for these services will be assessed against the developing
properties. An irrevocable letter of credit must be posted by the developer in an
amount equal to 150% of the estimated construction costs to ensure timely
completion of the project.
If a public sanitary sewer or water main project is to be installed as a City
Improvement Project, the developer will be responsible for 100% of the direct
and indirect costs incurred by the City. These costs may include, but are not
limited to: feasibility report preparation, preliminary survey, preliminary design,
final design, construction staking, construction observation, as-built surveying
and drafting, and administrative and legal costs. The developer may ele�t to
have these costs assessed against the property being developed or pay the
costs directly to the City.
Storm Water Drainage
Street Storm Sewer
No special assessments will be levied for construction or reconstruction of storm
sewer systems within the City right-of-way as part of the Pavement Management
Program. However, in instances where storm sewer construction is incorporated
into Pavement Management Projects to resolve rear yard drainage issues, as
discussed in this policy, the costs associated with these improvements will be
specially assessed to the benefiting property owners.
In instances where storm sewer installation is required for development and
redevelopment projects, it shall be specially assessed to the property being
developed according to the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Assessments
section of this policy.
Rear Yard Storm Sewer
In certain instances, storm sewer is necessary in rear yard areas to correct
existing drainage problems. City staff will visit such problem areas at the request
of a homeowner to evaluate the situation and provide engineering assistance to
encourage property owners to remedy the drainage problems without City
involvement.
If a property owner or owners cannot remedy the rear yard drainage problems,
they may petition the City for installation of storm sewer. Upon receiving a
request for petition for rear yard storm sewer, engineering staff will determine the
properties that contribute storm water runoff to the problem area. The petitioner
must then circulate the petition to the contributing property owners for signatures.
Each contributing property owner must be made aware that special assessments
will be levied against their property for the corrective storm sewer work. A
minimum of 35% of the contributing property owners must sign the petition for
the City Council to consider the project. Upon receipt of the petition and after a
public hearing, the City Council may either deny the request or order the storm
sewer improvements. If the improvements are ordered, the contributing property
ios
owners will be assessed for 100% of the construction and indirect costs for the
storm sewer installation. The method of assessment and the pro-ration of costs
will be determined on a project-specific basis.
Affected property owners in rear yard drainage projects will also be required to
dedicate all drainage and utility easements for the installation of the storm sewer
at no cost to the City. If the City must purchase or condemn in order to obtain the
easements, the entire acquisition costs will be included in the project costs for
assessment or the City may decline to undertake the project.
Street Improvements
DevelopmenURedevelopment Prolects
When property is developed or redeveloped that has street frontage on
roadways that are scheduled for construction or reconstruction, the development
will be required to pay an escrow for the future street rehabilitation. The escrow
shall be based upon the assessment methods and land uses contained in this
policy, and shall be based on the assessment rates in effect at the time the
development is approved. The property or properties within the development will
not be specially assessed at the time street rehabilitation occurs.
Sidewalks
No special assessments will be levied for sidewalk construction that is in
accordance with the goals and recommendations of the City of Golden Valley
Sidewalk Committee. Requests for sidewalks that are not on the current
Sidewalk and Trail Plan will be forwarded to the Sidewalk Committee for
consideration. The Sidewalk Committee will forward its recommendations for the
requested sidewalks to the City Council, which will determine if the proposal
should be included in the Sidewalk Plan.
Street Lighting,
Street lighting is available to the residents of Golden Valley on a petition basis
according to the Street Lighting Policy.
New Street Construction
As property within the City develops or redevelops, it may be necessary to install
public streets. The Public Works Department will determine if the project is to be
installed publicly or privately. The procedures, policies, and requirements for
street construction will be the same as discussed for new sanitary sewer
installations.
Sealcoatina
No special assessments will be levied for street sealcoating.
Bituminous Milling and Overla�rs
No special assessments will be levied for bituminous milling and overlays.
109
Street Reconstruction
Special assessments for street reconstruction projects will be in accordance with this
policy and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The total amount of the special
assessments will be a minimum of 20% of the street reconstruction costs not to exceed
the benefit received by each property. Special assessment rates for all land uses and
street classifications will be determined annually by ordinance.
Local Streets
1. Properties with residential and duplex residential land use, parks and other City-
owned properties subje�t to reconstruction will be assessed on a per-unit basis,
with one unit assessed to each property unless the property has the potential to
be further subdivided into two or more lots that each meets City subdivision
ordinance requirements. Such lots that may be so subdivided shall be assessed
for the number of units that equals the number of such lots that the property may
be subdivided into. However, residential properties that are subject to multiple
unit assessments will have all but one of such unit assessments deferred at the
time of the initial assessment. Such deferral will be made each year until such
time as the property is subdivided. At that time, the deferred unit assessments
shall be due.
2. Special assessments against properties with Multiple Dwelling land use will be
on a front-foot basis, with 100% of the frontage being improved subject to
assessment.
3. Properties with church, school and other tax exempt land uses will be assessed
on a front-foot basis, with 100% of the frontage being improved subject to
assessment.
4. All other land uses, including commercial, industrial, business and offices will be
assessed on a front-foot basis, with 100% of the frontage being improved subject
to assessment.
5. Residential properties adjacent to local streets being reconstructed may
participate in voluntary programs to have their driveways reconstructed and
sanitary sewer service repaired or reconstructed at contract unit prices.
Residents will be notified of these programs at informational meetings for each
street project. If a resident participates in these programs, staff will coordinate
construction with the contractor and will measure the quantities installed. The
construction costs, along with an administrative fee, established annually by
ordinance, will be assessed to the property owner.
6. When a corner residential lot has frontage on two local streets, it will be
assessed for one-half unit assessment for each street subject to reconstruction.
No more than one total unit assessment will be charged against a parcel for
street reconstruction. Corner properties adjacent to State Aid and local streets
will be charged one-half of the appropriate unit assessment at the time of
reconstruction of each street.
iio
7. Corner residential properties adjacent to a local street and a state or county
roadway will not be subject to special assessments by the City for state highway
or county road reconstruction. However, these properties will be assessed the
appropriate number of unit assessments for the entire frontage along the local
streets when reconstruction occurs on the local street.
8. Residential properties adjacent to frontage roads of state highways will be
considered to be on local or Municipal State Aid streets and will be assessed
consistent with this policy.
9. Special Assessments for properties not specifically covered in any of the above
cases will be addressed on a parcel-specific basis at the time of the feasibility
report.
State Aid Streets
1. Properties with residential and duplex residential land uses that have frontage on
a Municipal State Aid Street will be assessed on a per-unit basis. The per-unit
assessment rate will be approximately 25% of the standard residential rate for
properties on local streets. Assessments for oversized parcels with the potential
for subdivision are to be consistent with the previously discussed policy for local
streets.
2. Properties with Multiple Dwelling land use that front on a Municipal State Aid
Street will be assessed on a front-foot basis for the frontage being improved.
Properties with church, school, and other tax-exempt land uses that front on a
Municipal State Aid Street will be assessed on a front-foot basis for the frontage
being improved.
All other land uses, including commercial, industrial, business and offices that
front on a Municipal State Aid Street will be assessed on a front-foot basis for the
frontage being improved.
3. Special assessments for properties not specifically covered in any of the above
cases will 6e addressed on a parcel-specific basis at the time of the feasibility
report.
4. Residential properties adjacent to State Aid streets being reconstructed will be
given the option of having their driveways and sanitary sewer services repaired
or reconstructed under the same terms discussed in the local street
reconstruction portion of this policy.
Coun Roads
1. Properties with residential and duplex residential land uses adjacent to county
roads will be assessed according to the previously discussed methods for local
streets, except for corner lots with local streets, which will be assessed in full at
tt�
the time the intersecting local street is reconstructed. Special assessments to
residential properties will be at State Aid street rates.
2. All other land uses, including commercial, industrial, business, and tax-exempt
uses will be assessed on a front-foot basis, with 100% of the frontage being
improved subject to assessment. The assessment rate shall be the rates used
for State Aid streets as established by ordinance.
Low Income Senior Citizen and Disability Deferments
As required by Minnesota Statute, the City has a special assessment deferral policy for
low income senior citizens and disabled persons meeting all of the following criteria:
1. The property upon which the assessment is deferred must be homesteaded;
2. The property is owned by a person at least 65 years of age on January 1 st of the
year in which payment of the first installment of the subject assessment is due; or is
owned by a person who is retired due to permanent and total disability.
3. The applicant must have a "financial hardship" defined as:
a) An annual income at or below a level established annually by ordinance and;
b) The aggregate total of all special assessments levies will exceed one and one-
half percent (1-1/2%) of the applicant's annual income.
More information is available at General Services Office (763.593.8020).
Street Reconstruction Special Assessment Rates
Special assessment rates as discussed in this policy will be established yearly with the
Annual Fee Resolution. The rates will be based on the percentages of construction and
indire�t costs as discussed above. Indirect costs are estimated to be 30% of the
constru�tion costs and include administration, engineering, construction observation,
and legal fees. These rates will be subject to revision each year based on the actual
construction costs in the City from the previous year and for inflation based upon the
ENR Index for construction costs.
112
�it�r- __
��f �\
,— , \ 11
o , � � e
VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GUIDELINES
Public Works Department Vehicle Maintenance Division Management
Methodology
To manage the City's fleet in a manner that theoretically all of the City's motorized
equipment and vehicles are maintained and disposed of by the Public Works
Department Vehicle Maintenance Division. The Vehicle Maintenance Division has full
responsibilifiy for vehicle and equipment maintenance and the equipment users are
charged an hourly repair rate for all service and repairs.
1. Expected Life
When new vehicles or equipment are purchased, it is given an expected life (years
in service) based on a variety of factors. Below are the estimated life expectancies
for some of the significant pieces of equipment:
a. Engine Pumpers 20+ years (refurbish half way through life cycle)
b. Tandem Dump Trucks 12 years
c. Single Axle Dump Trucks 12-14 years-some longer
d. Wheel Loaders 15-18 years
e. Backhoe/Excavators 10-12 years
f. Jet Truck 10 years
g. One-Ton Trucks 9-10 years
h. 3/ and '/Ton Pickups 10 years-some longer
i. Skid Steers 8-10 years
j. Street Sweeper 8 years
k. Tractors Varies (15 years average)
I. Vactor Truck 10 years
m. Mowers Varies (6-10 years)
n. Sport Utility Vehicle 10 years
o. Passenger Cars/Vans 10 years
p. Squad Cars 100,000 miles/4 years
q. Trailers 15 years
r. Sidewalk Machines 10-12 years
113
2. Replacement Factors
When a particular piece of vehicle or equipment achieves its expected life and
reaches its anticipated replacement year, it is analyzed to determine if it should be
replaced based on the following factors:
a. Critical nature of the equipment or vehicle and the availability of a backup or
alternative equipment or vehicle. For example, the Sewer Jet is a critical piece of
equipment for which there is no backup except to contract for those services. It is
important to have this equipment operational with minimal downtime.
b. Use of the equipment or vehicle (hours and/or miles). The duration and intensity
of use are also important factors. For example, squad cars typically achieve their
expected life of 100,000 miles and are retired in approximately 4 years while
other vehicles (cars and light trucks) may never achieve 100,000 miles and can
last for many years.
c. Appropriateness of the equipment or vehicle for the assigned tasks. Public Works
and the user examines whether the equipment or vehicle is still capable of doing
its intended work, whether it is the right equipment, and determine if the work
changed causing the equipment or vehicle to be obsolete.
d. Repair history, costs, and downtime. Mechanics provide critical input and
assessments of the overall condition of the equipment. Near the end of the
expected life of the equipment or vehicle, repair costs can exceed the value of
the equipment or vehicle and replacement is appropriate.
e. Suitability of the equipment or vehicle for other tasks. Other departments provide
input regarding the ability to reassign equipment and vehicles to other less
frequent or intense duties. For example, Public Works have re-assigned used
marked squad cars and light pickup trucks to other departments.
3. Life Cycle Costing
This accounting method is used as much as possible in managing the City's fleet
management. Life cycle costing includes the purchase cost of the equipment or
vehicle, lifetime maintenance and operation costs, and the residual value at the time
of disposal. This is the true cost of equipment or vehicle ownership. The goal is to
replace the equipment during its economic life. This is the period when the
maintenance costs are the lowest.
4. Fire Department Vehicle Replacement Practice
Fire apparatus is historically refurbished half way through its life cycle
(approximately 10-12 years) and replaced after 20 to 24 years of service, or a couple
of years longer depending on condition. This general rule applies to "major"
apparatus, engine, and ladder trucks. The replacement of a particular piece of
apparatus is based upon several factors including the general mechanical and
structural condition, required vehicle and safety upgrades, technological changes,
114
current and anticipated use, anticipation of future mission changes; and the current
mechanical history (including mileage).
The apparatus replacement schedule is revised to refle�t a philosophy of validating
the replacement of a vehicle, as opposed to replacement based solely upon the age
of the vehicle. To this end, vehicles have been moved back in the replacement
schedule and not replaced at the time mark historically associated with replacement
schedules. Refurbishing pumpers and ladders to extend the "life" of fire apparatus is
a common practice. Refurbishing pumper and ladder fire vehicles extends vehicle
life.
- 115