HRC Agenda 101311AGENDA
GOLDEN VALLEY HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Golden Valley City Hall
Council Conference Room
October 13, 2011 — 7 pm
A = Action D = Discussion
Call to Order
Open Forum
Chair's Report
A - Approval of the minutes from September 8, 2011 regular meeting.
Committee Reports:
I. Executive Committee Report
II. Nomination and Governance Committee Report
III. Human Rights Community Issues Report from GV Police Dept.
Old Business
D/A - Bill Hobbs Human Rights Award
New Business
D- Community Meeting Planning
Adiournment
This document is available in alternate formats upon a 72 -hour request. Please call
763-593-8006 (TTY: 763-593-3968) to make a request. Examples of alternate formats
may include large print, electronic, Braille, audiocassette, etc.
THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS
4100 Lakeview Avenue North, Robbinsdale, MN 55422 Telephone (763) 535-1059
0
TO: All members of the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions
1`61.
w1(Y-3-16 FROM: The League Board of Directors Awareness and Outreach Team
W.
RE: Lobbying against the 2012 Constitutional Amendment
DATE: September 26, 2011
Moorhead However, courts have held that public funds belong equally to the proponents and
New Hope`°" opponents of a proposition. Minnesota law prohibits local government entities from
Nortfie
Northfield spending _public funds on campaigns to promote the rejection or adoption of
Olmsted County
Owatonna amendments to the Minnesota Constitution. Op. Att'y Gen. Statein'ent of Position,
Plymouth -a; Expenditure of Public Funds on Ballot Issue Advocacy (July 2008). Therefore, local
Richfield commissions cannot lawfully spend public money on 'opposing, the "constitutional
Roosevilleale amendment. For example, a local commission probably should not spend money in its
St Cloud
St Louis Park r budget on publishing an ad in the" local paper on opposing the constitutional amendment
St Paul ti
s P* i xs N x1 wY" r: Yx Yr.r f•
St Peter
Shakopee Notwithstandingwthis resttiction; tl ere is still s loty,a local commission can do to"help' :'
Shoreview
Stillwater .i! z1?, �{r�X s s ,', L
Virginia "defeat: this'`amendment Ivlariyj of our locahhuman-.:rights ,ordinances -define human }
Willmar ' nights commissioners as^"persons_known to favor the principles of equal opportunity and '
Winona o hers in formation nondiscrimination" — like supporting the MN Human Rights �Act,'prohibition against
discrimination based on someone's sexual orientation. As advocates for human rights,
you can take a stand against this discrimination.
[OVER]
As you are probably aware, in May of 2011, the Minnesota legislature approved putting
Board of Directors:
Cameron Cegelske, Pres., St. Paul
a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex - marriage to Minnesota voters in
Ada Alden, Vice Pres., Plymouth
Dave Gallus, Treasurer, mile Lacs
November 2012. League members have contacted us recently, asking us if we had any
Beth Burrows, Co.,Sec., New Ulm
Virginia laevom, Co -Sec.,. Plymouth
information on lobbying against the proposed amendment.
Sam Abdullai,Shoreview
Carol Bannister, Lake Elmo
Arnold Bigbee, Edina
Since 1993, Minnesota has prohibited discrimination in public services against people
Elizabeth Emerson, St. Paul
Libby Fairchild, Chaska
because of their sexual orientation. The League's mission is to assist its members —
Peg Flaherty, New Hope
Georgette Gray, Robbinsdale
local human rights commissions -like you — to enhance the rights of all groups of people
Louisa Hent, Minneapolis
Molly Koivumaki, Chaska
protected under the Minnesota Human Rights Act. So, we felt it was necessary to
Thelma McKenzie, Roseville
Sonja Peterson, Minneapolis,
update you on lobbying against the amendment.
Evelyn Staus, Brooklyn Park
Scott Yeazle, Duluth
Nancy Haugdahl, Financial Coord.
Larry Clark, Honorary, Red wing
But the first question we must ask as local government commissions is: Can we lobby
on constitutional amendments? There are some legal restrictions on local government
units from advocating for or against the passage of constitutional amendments. First and
Member Commissions:
foremost, and thanks to the First Amendment, the Minnesota Attorney General's Office
Albert Lea
Anoka
has concluded that:
Arden Hills
Austin
Brooklyn Park
B ook
Public officials are generally free, individually and collectively to announce their
Chakcrystals
views on matters of public interest. Furthermore, it is not likely that local
Du
Prairie
governments or associations can be precluded from taking and publicizing
Edina
Fairmont
positions on such matters, even in those circumstances where the matters are not
Falcon Heights
Fergus Falls
within the jurisdiction of the governing bodies.
Forest Lake
Golden Valley
Grand Hibbing
Op. Att'y Gen., 6/30/06, p. 6. Thus, as individuals and as a commission, you can take a
Op.
ns
st
°ankilCounty
position against the proposed constitutional amendment and encourage others in your
Lake Elmo
Marshall
community to do likewise.
Mille Lacs Area
Minneapolis
Moorhead However, courts have held that public funds belong equally to the proponents and
New Hope`°" opponents of a proposition. Minnesota law prohibits local government entities from
Nortfie
Northfield spending _public funds on campaigns to promote the rejection or adoption of
Olmsted County
Owatonna amendments to the Minnesota Constitution. Op. Att'y Gen. Statein'ent of Position,
Plymouth -a; Expenditure of Public Funds on Ballot Issue Advocacy (July 2008). Therefore, local
Richfield commissions cannot lawfully spend public money on 'opposing, the "constitutional
Roosevilleale amendment. For example, a local commission probably should not spend money in its
St Cloud
St Louis Park r budget on publishing an ad in the" local paper on opposing the constitutional amendment
St Paul ti
s P* i xs N x1 wY" r: Yx Yr.r f•
St Peter
Shakopee Notwithstandingwthis resttiction; tl ere is still s loty,a local commission can do to"help' :'
Shoreview
Stillwater .i! z1?, �{r�X s s ,', L
Virginia "defeat: this'`amendment Ivlariyj of our locahhuman-.:rights ,ordinances -define human }
Willmar ' nights commissioners as^"persons_known to favor the principles of equal opportunity and '
Winona o hers in formation nondiscrimination" — like supporting the MN Human Rights �Act,'prohibition against
discrimination based on someone's sexual orientation. As advocates for human rights,
you can take a stand against this discrimination.
[OVER]
United we stand, but divided we fall: Our country is based on this principle -- and so is the
institution of marriage. Marriage is a public expression of a couple's commitment, love, and
responsibility for oach other and their family. „ Minnesota has an interest in promoting family
units to achieve social stability, eco riof.m c int'e'rdependence; `and a� ealthy environment where
children and adults may prosper. The dimensions of `family'. have ; expanded ,considerably in
recent years, and the 2010 U.S. Census indicates that families headed by or consisting of same-
sex couples reside in every county in Minnesota. By withholding from some families important
legal rights and obligations, a constitutional amendment banning the legal recognition of same-
sex relationships would frustrate the State's goal of promoting families. In addition, the
amendment does not fulfill the intent of Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, i.e., the right to freely choose a spouse.
Constitutions,historically_ have .been designed to protect minorities from the arbitrary; imposition
• - r. r•iit ... r...r r',.. r. rll Y.e A1J w.al
of unjust barriers by the majority. In fact, Arti6le~1 of the Mfffi esota Constitution is the Bill of
Rights, securing the rights, privileges and liberty of the residents of Minnesota. The amendment
would have a direct, negative impact on Minnesota's GLBT community, by denying equal
protection of the law and relegating families headed by or consisting of same-sex couples to a
permanent second-class citizenship status. The amendment would deny spousal benefits to a
specific class because of their sexual orientation. Don't turn Minnesota's Bill of Rights into a
Bill of Anti -Rights!
Here is what the League is. recommending of its members who; want. to take action against
this discrimination: An organization called Minnesotans United for All Families is a coalition
made up of faith organizatioins, small businesses, labor uAions .arts groups, community leaders,
elected officials, Republicans, DFL'ers, Greens, Independents, etc. ' This coalition is sponsoring
more than a dozen trainings all over the state to provide people with the skills, tools and
confidence to talk to their family, friends, coworkers, and neighbors about the amendment. We
encourage our members to attend the trainings, speak to others, and team together to defeat the
amendment. Enclosed is a flyer about the trainings, and here is a site for the events:
http:/hnnunited.org/event. cfin?eventid=l8
You may also contact Minnesotans. United for All Families at 651-330-6852 or
VOLUNTEER(&,MNUNITED.ORG and ask them for training in your community or for other
information on how you may work to defeat the constitutional amendment.
In addition, the League recommends that 'you contact OutFront Minnesota at
http://www.outfront.org/takeaction/volunteer,
or Project 515, at http://project5l5.org/volunteer/ for more information on how you and your
commission can volunteer to defeat the amendment.
Finally, volunteer with the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions, by contacting
Outreach(a,leaQueofinnhumanrihg ts.org.
THANKS FOR SUPPORTING HUMANRIGHTS FOR ALL INMINNESOTA!
MINNESOTANS
UNITED
for ALL FAMILIES ,..;F•..
COMMUNITY ACTION TRAININGS.
Date and Time: ° Sep' 13, 2011- Oct 16, 2011
10:00 AM- 8:30:00 PM
Contact info: volunteer@mnunited.orgor 651-330-6852
Minnesota can be the first state in the country to defeat an anti -marriage amendment!
We're going to do it the Minnesota way: the largest grassroots campaign this state has ever seen.
That's why OutFront Minnesota and Minnesotans United for all Families are teaming up to put on
more than a dozen trainings in every corner ofthe staWmore than *aydebefo'r"e'tlie'first'Votes are cast!
That's where you come in! Whether this is the first time you've ever cared about politics or you're a
seasoned organizer we're ready to help you get to work. You can expect to come out of the training
with the:
• skills
• tools
• confidence
to talk to your family, friends coworkers and neighbors about the anti -marriage amendment'.
RSVP on Facebook or by filling,oiut the form located at
http://www.mnunited.org/event.cfm?eveni*i*d=tg",""
C
Minneapolis
Tuesday, September 13th from 6-8pm
Location: Sabathani Community Center Auditorium, 310 East 38th Street #200
Moorhead
Saturday, September 17 from 10am-12pm
Location: First Congregational UCC, 406 South 8th Street
North Metro Suburbs
Tuesday, September 20 from 6-8pm
Location: TBD
:Duluth.
Saturday, September 24 from l 0am-12pm
Location: Pilgrim UCC, 2310 East 4th Street
Childcare is available for this event. To take advantage of this service, register your own RSVP
before contacting Mel Rexroad (mel.rexroad@familyequality.org or 612-516-4404).
Saint Paul
Wednesday, October 12 from 6-8pm.
Location: Hamline University
Rochester
Thursday, September 29 from 6-8pm.
Location: TBD
Childcare Is available for fhis*ev'dnt. To'take'ddVahtag . e'of this, setvice,-r'eg'l's't-'er."your o"w, ft RSVP
before contacting'* M6"*I-*Rexroad (mel.rexroad@fair'hily'equality.org br642-5 1-81440
Mankato
Saturday, October 1 from l0am-12pm
Location: TBD
South Metro Suburbs
Tuesday, October 4. from 6-8pm
Location: TBD
Alexandria
Thursday, October 6 from 6-8pm
Location: TBD
Bemidji
Saturday,* October 8 from 10am-12pm
Locatiom TBD
Saint -eloud
Tuesday, October 11 from 6-8pm
Location: S.CSU,--'-"
Childcare' i§ available fr'this event. To take advantage of this service, register your own RSVP
before contacting Mel Rexroad (mel.rexroad@fainilyequality.org or 612-516-'4404).'
Marshall
Saturday, October 15 from 10arn-12pm
Location: TBD
Minneapolis
Sunday, October 16 from 10am-12pm
Location: TBD
Childcare is available for this event. To take advantage of this service, register your own RSVP.
before contacting Mel Rexroad (mel.rexroad@familyequality.org or 612-516-4404).
RESOLUTION OF THE
,LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA HUMAN RIC14TS COMMISSIONS
May 22, 2011
Be It Resolved Than...
.Whereas, states,,, ave an interest,in promoting family units as a means toward cchieving
social stability, private economic interdeliendence, and healthier =viroiunents in which
both children and adults may prosper, and
Whereas, the U.S. Census for 2010 indicated that families headed by or consisting of
same-sex couples reside in every county in Minnesota, and.
Whereas, the United. States Supreme Court and others have noted that the dimensions of
"family" have expanded considerably in recent years, and
Whereas, an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution has been proposed that would
ban the legal recognition of sante-sex relationships within the state of Minnesota, and
Whereas, such an amendment would frustrate the State's goal of promoting families, by
withholding from: some families important legal rights and obligations, and
Whereas, constitutions historically have been designed to protect ininorities from the
ar6itraryimposition of unjust barriers by the majority, and
Whereas, this legislation, if approved, would have a direct, negative impact on
Minnesota's GLBT community in particular, by denying equal protection of the law and
.relegating families headed by or consisting of swine -sex couples to a permanent second-
class citizenship status, and
Whereas, the League of Minnesota Human .Rights Commissions recognizes that our ,
society benefits in proportion to its efforts to ensure cultural diversity and maintain an
environment in vdikh all reel welcome and sate, and
Whereas, such discriminatory legislation effectively devalues cultural diversity an.d
promotes an environment in which discrimination against GLBT citizens is not only
encouraged but mandated, resulting in a. community that is neither welcome nor safe,
Therefore be. it resolved toot the League of Minnesota Miman Rights Commissions hereby
states publicly ilrt opposition to changing the Minnesota constitution in order to ban the legal
recognition of same-sex relationships and unions, and
'Be it furthermore resolved that this document will be presented to .members of the press, in
addition to our membership.
Certification
This .resolution was approved by a vote oftli.e Board ofDirectors of the League of Minnesota
Human Rights Commissions on Inlay 22, 2011, ,with a total vote of 13 Board Mcinbers, 13 of
whom votedd in the affirmative, 0 of whom voted in the n4gative, and 0 of whom abstained.
- - _ --League vfMixu�.esQia IIutna�i Ri�lrts Camtnissx4ris�-
By the Board of Director's Secretary
_... "
HUMAN �
• •RIGHTS �7O'
COMMISSION:.
r00
' There is a significant
gap between the fair-
ness Minnesotans value and
what actually occurs under
Minnesota law. That's why
Minnesota volunteers formed
Project 515 and commissioned
its report. At a time when Min-
nesotans are discussing many
other issues that determine
what kind of state we'd like to
live in, it's important to discuss
another important quality -of -life
AL APr; ORE rwww.project5l5.org,
IN
issue — fairness for all Min-
nesotans, including same-
sex couples.
That's why it's critical to talk
about the 515 laws that dis-
criminate against Minnesota
gay, `lesbian, bisexual and
transgendered families, hear
the stories of real Minnesotar
affected by these laws and
take action!
t
• • Please contact
Carolyn Curti
• carolyn.curti@ci.roseville.mn.us %
PHONE: 651-792-7026
Ligkt Refs' j
----------- =-----------------------------,
— ----t------------Many_thanks.to.our Co -Sponsor, ---
Shoreview Human Rights Commissions
-----------------------�