01-30-12 Special CM Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA
Joint Meeting
of the
City Council, Planning Commission, Environmental Commission
and Open Space and Recreation Commission
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chambers
Monday, January 30, 2012
6:30 pm
Pages
1. Bottineau Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Comment 2-8
Formulation Exercise
Special Council/Manager Meeting
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Conference Room
Monday, January 30, 2012
6:30 pm or immediately following Joint Meeting
1. Proposed 2012 Legislative Priorities 9-19
2. Honors/Recognitions 20
Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed for the Council to
obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and provide general directions to staff. No
formal actions are taken at these meetings. The public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and
listen to the discussion; public participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council.
TtiisNdr�c�im�r�t i�a�ai�a�i6e i��It�rn�te f€�rm��u��r�a 7�=1ic�ur r��c��s�..P(e�se c��l
7�3=��3-8f��16�`�':���-�9�����8�tt�,rr�ak����t�c�est. Exampl�s�if�I��rr�at�f�rr��ts �,
m�j��r��l�d�t���e�rint,''el��tt�s�r�ic, �r��11e,audi�c�ssette;�tc.
�Am �. >
��
�s'��
Planning
O �, e 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Joint Meeting of the City Council, Planning Commission,
Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission
January 30, 2012
Agenda Item
1. Bottineau Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Comment Formulation
Exercise
Prepared By
Joe Hogeboom, City Planner
Summary
A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) is currently being done to study the possible
impacts associated with the proposed Bottineau Transitway alignment. A primary part of the
DEIS analysis is the "scoping process." The scoping process is the method used to
determine what content should be a part of the DEIS and further study.
As part of the DEIS scoping process, Hennepin County is collecting comments from
impacted government agencies along the corridor as well as from the general public. For this
process, all comments are due to Hennepin County on or before February 17, 2012. The
County would like a resolution from the City Council stating whether or not it supports further
study of the Bottineau Transitway D-1 Alternative. The resolution may go on to provide more
specific comments or direction to the County.
To aid in developing comments, the City Council has requested that the Planning
Commission, Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission
provide input on the Bottineau Transitway. More information about the Transitway, including
possible alignments, can be found in the "Scoping Booklet", located online at
www.bottineautransitway.orq.
At the meeting, staff will present a short video that highlights the Bottineau Transifinray project
and next steps, walk Council Members and Commissioners through the Scoping Booklet and
guide a discussion that wi{I aid in developing formal comments on the Bottineau Transitway
DEIS.
Attachments
Memo from the Public Works Department dated January 23, 2012 (6 pages)
. • � �� �
�
o ��
�� :Yh � e Pubfic Works
�� 763.593.8030/763.593.3988 (fax)
Date: January 26, 2012
To: Tom Burt, City Manager
Through: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
From: Mark Ray, PE, Engineer
Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist
Subject: Bottineau Transitway - Initial Staff Comments
The Bottineau Transifinray is a proposed high frequency transit service that could include
bus rapid transit (BRT) or light rail transit (LRT) to serve the northwest area of the Twin
Cities. Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) has requested that
communities potentially impacted by the proposed Bottineau Transitway submit
comments as part of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) scoping
process. The scoping process allows communities to provide input on preferred
alignment and station location, and identify local issues that require further study.
Alignments
LRT
Alignments involving the City of Golden Valley include the D1 (BNSF Railway-Olson
Memorial Highway) which travels through the northeast portion of Golden Valley, and
the D2 (West Broadway-Penn Avenue) which travels through North Minneapolis,
bypassing Golden Valley. If selected, the D2 alignment has very little, if any, effect on
Golden Valley.
BRT
HCRRA indicated that the D1 alignment would be the preferred route, should BRT be
chosen for the transitway.
Station Location
If the D1 alignment through Golden Valley is selected to be evaluated in the DEIS, one
station location must be chosen. The potential station locations for the D1 are Golden
Valley Road near Wirth Parkway and Plymouth Avenue near Wirth Parkway. Both
potential stations are located in the City of Golden Valley and require the acquisition of
property owned by the City of Minneapolis (Wirth Regional Park managed by the
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board).
HCRRA studies show that the Golden Valley Road station would serve mostly Golden
Valley residents and businesses and the Plymouth Avenue station would serve mostly
Minneapolis residents, businesses, and Wirth Park facilities. Businesses served in
Golden Valley include regional destinations (Courage Center, Minneapolis Clinic of
Neurology) and local destinations (Church of St. Margaret Mary, Unity Christ Church).
No matter where the transit station is sited, the neighborhood impacts of the freight rail
and transifinray would be unchanged. While a station located at Plymouth Avenue would
likely have less effect on Golden Valley neighborhoods and community resources, the
Golden Valley Road station would provide more direct benefit to Golden Valley
residents and businesses. In addition, the Golden Valley Road location is on an existing
bus line with potential feeder bus connections, and has planned regional trail
connections, giving it a significant advantage over the Plymouth Avenue location.
Following are staff's recommendation along with initial comments regarding the
potential impacts and benefits of the Bottineau Transitway project.
Staff Recommendation
Staff acknowledges that a bus rapid transit (BRT) or light rail transit (LRT) facility
located in Golden Valley would have a significant impact on the community. After
preliminary review of the project scoping information, it appears that a transitway line
and station would bring forth opportunities for multi-modal transportation and
redevelopment that may otherwise not exist in this area of Golden Valley. Based upon
the information available at this time, staff believes that the D1 alignment (through
Golden Valley) with a station location at Golden Valley Road be evaluated in the DEIS.
The comments below reflect this recommendation.
Comment on Project Impacts
At this stage in the scoping process, HCRRA desires feedback on the potential project
impacts to be addressed in the DEIS. Following are staff comments on key issues
identified by HCRRA and the City.
Noise and Vibration
The proposed D1 alignment through Golden Valley will pass through a residential
neighborhood and a regional park. The potential noise and vibration impacts from the
transitway and the freight track are a significant concern. If a transit station is located at
Golden Valley Road, there may be additional noise and disruption that has not yet been
studied or anticipated. Staff understands that BRT and LRT may yield different noise
and vibration levels in surrounding neighborhoods. These effects should be studied in
greater detail.
2
Visual and Aesthetics
With high frequency transit service, the potential transitway and transit station will have
a visual impact on surrounding properties. Most notably will be the addition of lights and
lighting that does not exist with the current freight rail. The effects of lighting should be
studied and the screening of adjacent neighborhoods and park areas should be
considered as part of this project.
Neiqhborhood and Community Resources
The proposed transitway and transit station would likely require an increase in
community resources such as police, fire, public works maintenance, and traffic
management. In addition, neighborhood groups may be affected. A benefit of the project
is that the residential neighborhoods do not appear to be permanently fragmented,
divided, or disconnected.
Safety and Security
Both of the proposed transit stations are located in the City of Golden Valley. Since the
proposed transit system is managed by the Metropolitan Council, it is anticipated that
Metro Transit Police will be the primary law enforcement agency at the station.
Parks and Public Land
The existing rail line runs along the edge of Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Mary Hills
Nature Area, and Glenview Terrace Park. These parks and the experience of park users
are extremely important to the community. It is anticipated that any impacts to the parks
will be mitigated to the satisfaction of the park owner. Golden Valley requests that it be
involved in any planning or decision that affects its parks.
Historic and Cultural Resources
As the proposed project would impact fringe areas of large parks and natural areas, and
Bassett Creek, the area would need to be studied for the presence of historic and
cultural resources.
Transportation
There are two proposed locations for a station in Golden Valley. Based on the analysis
of the area served by either location, the Golden Valley Road station would provide
better access to Golden Valley residents. Existing bus service and existing and planned
pedestrian facilities also make this station location attractive. Providing and maintaining
good access, via multiple modes of transportation, is essential in realizing the full
benefits of a transit station in Golden Valley. In order to fit into the community, additional
transportation improvements and enhancements may be needed. Other transportation
considerations include:
1. Construction Impacts - During construction, there may be additional wear and
tear on the surrounding transportation network, it is expected that construction-
related impacts would be addressed as part of the project.
3
2. Parking - In the event that transit riders park on the surrounding streets to access
the new transifinray, a traffic management plan should be considered to outline
the procedure for communication befinreen agencies to respond concerns.
Currently, there are no plans for a park and ride facility as part of this project.
However, this should be considered if a station is planned for Golden Valley
Road. Surrounding businesses have voiced concerns about their existing parking
conditions. The integration of public and private parking improvements coupled
with redevelopment should be further studied.
3. Traffic - The trip generation from the proposed station or a future park and ride
facility may result in the need to modify, enhance, or expand the nearby
transportation system. It is expected that HCRRA would partner with the
appropriate road authority to address and mitigate any traffic concerns.
4. Trails and Sidewalks - Sidewalks currently serve both proposed station locations.
The existing sidewalk system may need to be upgraded or expanded to meet
accessibility design requirements and the needs of the community. It is expected
that this would be done as part of any site access evaluation and implementation.
The City of Golden Valley owns and maintains concrete sidewalks on both sides
of Golden Valley Road (CSAH 66) at the intersection of the proposed transitway.
In addition, Three Rivers Park District has identified the Golden Valley Road
corridor for the proposed Bassett Creek Regional Trail which would connect
French Regional Park and the Medicine Lake Regional Trail to Wirth Regional
Park and the trails along the Grand Rounds National Scenic Byway. This network
of trails and sidewalks would complement LRT or BRT to improve the multimodal
transportation in the area.
The City owns and maintains an asphalt trail near the BNSF railway in the Mary
Hills Nature Area. This trail provides an important north-south connection from
Golden Valley Road north to Robbinsdale via Sochacki Park. It is anticipated that
a new transitway may impact this trail and staff requests that it be actively
involved with any reconstruction or realignment of this trail.
The costs to reconstruct Golden Valley Road and the existing multi-modal
facilities discussed above, in addition to any facilities deemed necessary to fully
meet the anticipated needs, must be considered in evaluation of the potential
station location.
Water Resources, Wetlands, and Habitat
1. Flood Storage -Any impacts to the floodway or floodplain must be mitigated in
accordance with the laws and policies of the regulating agencies. Staff
recognizes that mitigation within the existing railroad corridor will be challenging,
and it encourages HCRRA to work closely with the Bassett Creek Watershed
4
Management Commission (BCWMC) and its member cities to identify potential
flood storage areas outside of the railroad rights-of-way.
2. Wetlands -Wetland impacts will need to be mitigated in accordance with the laws
and policies of the regulating agencies. The City of Golden Valley is the local
government unit responsible for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act.
HCRRA is encouraged to work with its local partners to identify potential
mitigation solutions outside the railroad right-of-way, if needed.
3. Stormwater Management - The transifinray project will need permits or approvals
from all agencies regulating stormwater, including but not limited to the City,
BCWMC, and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. At a minimum, best
management practices addressing erosion and sediment control will need to be
implemented during construction. It is possible that rate control and stormwater
treatment that reduces pollutants and runoff will be required, especially with the
development of a transit station, park and ride facility, or other impervious
surface.
4. Endangered Species - Care should be taken to avoid impacts to the habitat and
travel ways of endangered, threatened, or special concern species.
Utilities
1. City-owned - The City of Golden Valley owns watermain, sanitary sewer, and
storm sewer facilities in the area of the proposed route. Some of these facilities
cross under the existing BNSF railway. Record drawings and other information
are available in the City's engineering office. The City requests that it be
consulted on all design and construction considerations, and field decisions
involving City-owned utilities.
2. Other Public Utilities - The City of Minneapolis owns a 48-inch watermain which
passes under the BNSF railway north of Golden Valley Road; and Metropolitan
Council Environmental Services owns a large sanitary sewer interceptor which
parallels the BNSF railway in Wirth Park. The City requests that it be consulted
along with the custodial agency if any changes are proposed or issues arise as a
result of the proposed project.
3. Xcel Energy - HCRRA's project consultant estimated that as many as 15 Xcel
Energy transmission line towers may need to be relocated as a result of the
proposed transitway. The City's Right-of-Way Management Ordinance currently
requires that any proposed reconstruction, relocation, or replacement of
overhead utility lines over 300 feet be buried underground. This code
requirement may apply to this situation.
5
Soil Conditions '
Many areas of Golden Valley have substandard soils which are unsuitable for
construction without proper correction or engineering. A good portion of the transitway
corridor through Golden Valley is located within floodplain, lowland, or wetland areas. In
addition, staff has witnessed the excavation of areas in Golden Valley that were filled
with construction debris or hazardou5 materials in the past. Staff recommends a careful
and detailed analysis of the soils as part of the project.
6
i
� �.
City Administration/Council
O ` � �, e 763-593-3989/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Special Council/Manager Meeting
January 30, 2012
Agenda Item
1. Proposed 2012 Legislative Policies
Prepared By
Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manger
Summary
For a number of years the City Council has adopted Legislative Policies in order to share
local priorities with area legislators and seek their assistance in forwarding these priorities.
Based on direction provided at the last Council/Manager Meeting, staff has drafted proposed
2012 Legislative Policies in eight (8) areas: Unfunded Mandates, Market Value Homestead
Credit and Homestead Market Value Exclusion, Voter ldentification, Inflow and Infiltration (I/I),
Impaired Waters, Organized Solid Waste Collection, Complete Streets, and City Speed Limit
Control. Copies of the proposed policies are attached.
Attachments
City of Golden Valley 2012 Proposed Legislative Policies (10 pages)
Discussion Issues
The Council should discuss the proposed 2012 policies and determine whether they wish to
make any changes.
city�f
�
v�. le
�
2012 Le islative Policies
g
Presented to the City Council February 7,2012
Policy 1. Unfunded Mandates
Issue
The cost of federal and state mandated programs substitute the judgment of Congress,the presi- �
dent,the Minnesota Legislature,and the governor for local budget priorities.These mandates
force cities to reduce funding for other basic services or to increase taxes and service charges.The
passage by the Legislature of reporting requirements for new state mandates,the Office of the
State Auditor program for local governments to register their ideas for mandates reform,and the
passage by Congress of legislation restraining new federal mandates,should help address the
problem,but other steps are necessary.
Although the Legislature discussed mandate relief during the 2011 legislative session,the final
resolution yielded very little in actual mandate relief.In recent years,the focus ha.s switched from
mandate relief to government redesign,and in 2010 legislation ultimately passed creating the
Commission on Service Innovation,and the Collaborative Governance Council.
Response
The City of Golden Valley recommends its legislative representatives seek flexibility for local agen-
cies to establish policies and priorities based on local needs as the most effective way to be fiscally
responsible and accountable,including the following:
• Existing unfunded mandates should be reviewed and modified,or repealed where possible.
• No additional statewide mandates should be enacted unless full funding for the mandate is
provided by the level of government imposing it or a permanent stable revenue source is es-
tablished.
• Cities should not be forced to comply with unfunded mandates.
• Cities should be given the greatest flexibility possible in implementing mandates to ensure
their cost is minimized.
• The different government redesign groups should consider the various unfunded mandates as
they look at local government reform and redesign and make recommendations for the next
session.
7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 1
Policy 2. Market Value Homestead Credit and
Homestead Market Value Exclusion
Issue
The 2011 Legislature and governor passed a law that repealed the existing market value home-
stead credit effective for taxes payable in 2012.To buffer the effects of this change on homeown-
ers,the Legislature enacted a new homestead market value exclusion system that reduces the
value on which qualifying homeowners pay property taxes.This new exclusion system will shift
tax burdens to other property types including businesses and apartments that do not receive the
value exclusion.These property tax shifts have raised concerns and suggestions that the former
system should be restored.
Response
The City of Golden Valley supports the the League of Minnesota Cities position of providing ad-
ditional property tax relief directly to homeowners through an expansion of the property tax relief
(PTR) program.The City opposes the restoration of the market value homestead credit(MVHC)
and encourages the elimination of the new homestead market value exclusion (HMVE).The City
further opposes more complex and cumbersome additions to the property tax system.
Page 2 City of Golden Valley 2012 Legislative Policies
Policy 3. Voter ldentification
Issue
The Legislature has discussed requiring all voters to present identification cards at the polls.
Response
The City of Golden Valley supports this legislation only if the cost of providing identification cards
to voters does not become the responsibility of cities and yet another unfunded mandate.
7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 3
Policy 4. Metropolitan Council Inflow/Infiltration
Issue
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Service's(MCES)Water Resources Management Plan es-
tablished an I/I surcharge in 2007 on cities determined by MCES to be contributing unacceptable
amounts of storm water to the MCES wastewater treatment system.Since the inception of the sur-
charge program,46 cities have been identified as excessive I/I contributors.This number is subject
to change,depending on rain events,and any city in the metropolitan area could be affected.
While Metro Cities recognizes the importance of controlling I/I because it affects the size,and
therefore the cost,of wastewater treatment systems and because excessive I/I in one city can
affect development capacity of another,we are concerned about the potential for cities to incur
increasingly exorbitant costs,and decreasing benefits,in their on-going efforts to mitigate exces-
sive I/L
Metro Cities supported the recommendations of the 2010 I/I Demand Charge Task Force for a
second phase,on-going surcharge program to address I/I mitigation in the region.Metro Cities
further supported adjustments to the flow methodology used to measure excess I/I that allow for
the normalizing of precipitation variability.Metro Cities also encourages the Council to work with
cities on community-specific issues that fall outside the scope of the task force report and recom-
mendations.
Metro Cities continues to monitor the surcharge program,and encourages the Metropolitan
Council to support state financial assistance for Metro Area I/I mitigation through future Clean
Water Legacy Act appropriations or similar legislation.
Metro Cities supports continued state capital assistance to provide grants to metro area cities for
the purpose of mitigating inflow and infiltration problems into municipal wastewater collection
systems.
Response
The City of Golden Valley is a leader in the metropolitan area in addressing inflow and infiltration
from public and private sources.The City has spent millions of dollars to address I/I issues in the
municipal system.In addition,through the City's Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance,significant
investment has been made by property owners to reduce I/I from sewer services.
Because I/I reduction efforts benefit the entire metropolitan area,the City of Golden Valley sup-
ports the Metro Cities position that the state provide financial assistance through future Clean
Water Legacy Act appropriations or similar education.
Pag2 4 City of Golden Valley� 2012 Legislative Policies
Policy 5. Impaired Waters
Issue
Despite the billions of dollars that Minnesota municipalities have invested and continue to invest
in wastewater and stormwater management systems and best management practices to protect,
preserve,and restore the quality of Minnesota's surface waters,the quality of some of Minnesota's
surface waters does not meet federal water quality requirements.The federal Clean Water Act
requires that further efforts be made by the state to reduce human impacts on surface waters
that are determined to be impaired due to high pollutant loads of nutrients,bacteria,sediment,
mercury,and other contaminants.
Scientific studies of these waters must be conducted to determine how much pollution they can
handle(Total Maximum Daily Loads,orTMDLs).The pollutant load reduction requirements will af-
fect municipal,industrial,and agricultural practices and operations along any river,stream or lake
determined to be impaired.
While the source of 86 percent of the pollutants affecting Minnesota waters are non-point sourc-
es,there will also be new costs and requirements for point-source dischargers,like municipal
wastewater treatment facilities.Municipal stormwater systems will also face increased protective
requirements and regulation as part of the state's impaired waters program.
Response
The City of Golden Valley is committed to protecting its natural water features.The City supports
the League on Minnesota Cities'efforts in addressing impaired waters,including increased state
funding for projects and programs intended to protect and improve water quality state-wide and
the design and implementation of Minnesota's impaired waters program to:
• Ensure equitable funding solutions are found,such as the state general fund or bonding,that
broadly collect revenue to address this statewide problem.
• Support legislative appropriation of constitutionally dedicated clean water revenues that
supplement traditional sources of funding for these purposes,not be used to cover budget
cuts,backfill past program reductions,or to otherwise supplant normal state spending on wa-
ter programs.
• Direct the majority of funds collected by the state for impaired waters into programs that fund
municipal wastewater and stormwater projects,and for state programs needed for munici-
pal wastewater and stormwater permitting and technical support,including the Clean Water
Revolving Loan Fund,Wastewater Infrastructure Fund,Phosphorus Reduction Grant Program,
TMDL Grants Program,Small Community WastewaterTreatment Grant and Loan Program,and
other state programs that provide financial resources for city wastewater treatment facilities,
septic tank replacement,stormwater management projects,and other city water quality im-
provement and protection projects.
• More adequately cover the current five-year wastewater infrastructure funding need projection
of more than $2.1 billion.
• Recognize and address the upcoming costs of stormwater management infrastructure and
operation on municipalities from new regulatory mandates and load reduction requirements.
7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 5
• Allow flexibility in achieving pollutant load reductions and limitations through ofFsets or trad-
ing of pollutant load reduction credits for both point and nonpoint load reduction require-
ments within watersheds.
• Recognize and credit the work underway and already completed by local units of government
to limit point and non-point source water pollutant discharges.
• Recognize the diversity of efforts and needs that exists across the state.
• Ensure the best science available is used to accurately determine the sources of pollutant load
in order to maximize positive environmental outcomes and minimize unnecessary regulatory
and financial burdens for cities by correctly accounting for and addressing agricultural and
other non-point pollutant sources.
• Ensure the state requires that the MPCA retain control of the TMDL development process and
that all scientific research related toTMDLs is conducted by the MPCA or qualified,objective
parties pursuant to state contracting,procurement,and conflict of interest laws.
• Clarify state water quality mandates so cities know specifically what they are required to do and
what methods of achieving those outcomes are acceptable to state and federal regulators.
Page 6 City of Golden Valley� 2012 Legislative Policies
Policy 6. Organized Solid Waste Collection
Issue
"Organized collection"is the term used to refer to a situation where a local unit of government,for
any of a variety of reasons,decides that there is a public interest served by limiting the number of
solid waste and recycling collection services available in the area.The reasons for implementing
organized collection can vary but include:
• public safety concerns caused by the number and frequency of large trucks moving quickly
through residential neighborhoods
• reducing wear on public infrastructure from heavy truck traffic
• improving the efficiency,cost and quality of garbage and recycling service provided to local
residents
• cooperating with other local governments to best meet solid waste management and recycling
objectives
• taking local steps to reduce energy impacts of public services
• meeting the requirements of county ordinances and solid waste management plans as re-
quired under Minn.Stat.§ 115.94
Organized collection is also encouraged in state solid waste policies as a means of improving the
efficiency and coordination of solid waste management between local units of government.There
are very specific public procedures laid out in statute defining how such a decision must be pub-
licly vetted and approved and over what time period that can occur.
Despite all of these important and valid reasons for using organized collection,legislation has
been discussed in several recent sessions that would allow special takings claims by the solid
waste industry if local governments make decisions that limit the number of companies that can
collect garbage in a community in a manner that prevents a company currently operating in the
community from continuing to do so through the implementation of organized collection.The
unspecified and ongoing liability this change would create would have the effect of eliminating
organized collection as a waste management option.
This change would also create a virtual monopoly situation for any company awarded a solid
waste contract under organized collection.The local unit of government would have to"buy out"
a contractor in the future to change providers,even if their services were no longer the lowest
bid.Furthermore,this is a precedent that,if applied to other government purchasing and service
contracting decisions,would clearly run counter to the public purpose of government providing
services at the lowest feasible cost to taxpayers.
This issue has generated sufficient controversy that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is
currently conducting a study to attempt to determine whether efficiency benefits of organized
collection can be documented.
Response
The City of Golden Valley supports the League of Minnesota Cities in opposing efforts to apply
inverse condemnation claims to city solid waste contracting decisions.
7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 PdgC' 7
Further,the City supports the current state policy that organized collection is a valuable tool as
part of a comprehensive solid waste and recycling management program and recognizes the
need to protect and preserve the authority of cities to adopt solid waste service contracts that
protect public safety,the environment and public infrastructure.
Pa�e$ City of Golden Valley 2072 Legislative Policies
Policy 7. Complete Streets
Issue
A comptete street may include:sidewalks,bike lanes(or wide paved shoulders),special bus lanes,
comfortable and accessible public transportation stops,frequent and safe crossing opportunities,
median islands,accessible pedestrian signals,curb extensions,narrower travel lanes,and more.
There is increasing public support for the reform of local street design policies to make streets
safer for pedestrians,cyclists,and neighborhood residents.
Response
The City of Golden Valley has adopted a complete streets policy and has demonstrated its com-
mitment to providing transportation options for both motorized and non-motorized users.
The City supports the Metro Cities position that design guidelines include adequate flexibility to
exercise local decisions to provide safe and effective transportation for all modes of transporta-
tion,including walking and biking.The state should also provide incentives such as grants to local
units of government working to advance complete street projects.
The City suports the League of Minnesota Cities'opposition to state-imposed unfunded mandates
that would increase the costs of building streets in contexts where facilities for cyclists and pedes-
trians are unnecessary or inappropriate.
7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Vailey,MPl 55427 763-593-8006 Page 9
Policy 8. City Speed Limit Control
Issue
Toward Zero Deaths is a nationally recognized Minnesota program initiative with a mission to
create a culture for which traffic fatalities and serious injuries are no longer acceptable through
the integrated application of education,engineering,enforcement,and emergency medical and
trauma services.
There has been significant discussion,and legislative action,over recent years to reduce the
default speed fimit on residential streets within the state from 30 mph to 25 mph.On residential
roads,where traffic safety also affects pedestrians and users of alternative transportation modes,
Metro Cities supports a reduction in the state-wide default speed limit from 30 to 25 mph.Metro
Cities also supports design standards that result in slower speeds on local roads.In the event of
a uniform speed limit reduction,Metro Cities supports increased state funding for education and
enforcement.
At cities'or counties'discretion,Metro Cities also supports a year round reduction of speed limits
within 500 feet of any city or county parks and schools.
Response
The City of Golden Valley does not necessarily believe that a new maximum speed limit on resi-
dential streets will result in enough change in driver behavior to significantly reduce accidents.
However,a state-wide speed limit of 25 mph on residential streets can be effective with sufficient
education and enforcement.
The City supports the Metro Cities position that if there is a reduction in speed limits on residential
streets,a state-wide default speed limit of 25 miles per hour be adopted,provided there are no
requirements to install speed limit signs on each block.Furthermore,the City supports the posi-
tion that increased state funding be provided for education and enforcement of a new residential
speed limit.
Pa�e 1� City of Golden Valley 201 Z Legislative Policies
. m. �.
�
� � ° �
O � City Administration/Council
3 ��� �, e 763-593-8003/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Special Council/Manager Meeting
January 30, 2012
Agenda Item
2. Honors/Recognitions
Prepared By
Thomas Burt, City Manager
Summary
Mayor Harris requested this item be placed on the agenda.
Mayor Harris has suggested the Council honor and/or recognize local schools, organizations
and/or businesses. Suggested possibilities for recognition would be Armstrong High School
Band for winning Outback Bowl competition, Armstrong Debate Team (placed second in the
state) and Courage Center presented with the Circle of Excellence Award by the Minnesota
Department Human Services.