02-21-12 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA
Regular Meeting
of the
City Council
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chamber
February 21, 2012
6:30 pm
The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6
prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm
1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES
A. Roll Call
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Board/Commission Oath of Office and Presentation of Certificate of Appointment
D. City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) 2011 Project of the Year 3
E. Receipt of 2011 Police Department Annual Report 4-16
2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Consent Agenda -All items listed under this heading are considered to be
routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which
event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its
normal sequence on the agenda.
A. Approval of Minutes - Council/Manager Meeting - January 10, 2012; and Joint 17-20
Meeting of the City Council, Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and
Open Space and Recreation Commission - January 30, 2012
B. Approval of Check Registers:
1. City 21
2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 22
C. Licenses:
1. Rental Property Licenses 23-25
2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Northwest 26-29
Suburban Optimist Club
D. Bids and Quotes:
1. Manhole Covers - Quotes 30-32
2. Van - Quotes 33-34
3. Air Compressor - Quotes 35
E. Letters, Emails and/or Petitions:
1. Email Regarding Breck School 36
1. Letters and Emaiis Regarding Theodore Wirth Park/Bottineau Transit 37-60
F. Minutes of Boards and Commissions:
1. Planning Commission - January 23, 2012 61-67
2. Human Services Foundation - November 14, 2011 68
3. Joint Water Commission - December 7, 2012 69-71
4. Open Space and Recreation Commission - November 28, 2011 72-73
5. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission - November 16, 2011 74-80
G. Approval of Conditional Extension for Filing of Plat and Submitting Final PUD Plan 81-84
Application - PUD #107 - The Towers at West End - Southwest Quadrant of I-394
and Highway 100 - Duke Realty, Applicant
3. CONSENT AGENDA - CONTINUED
H. Authorization to Sign Agreements with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 85-87
for Relief Lift Station and Forcemain Project
1. Segment 1 Cooperative Agreement 88-127
2. Segment 2 Amended and Restated Cooperative Agreement 128-163
I. Authorization to Sign Agreements for 2012 Pavement Management Program 164-184
Sanitary Sewer Repair Program
J. Receipt of January 2012 Financial Reports 185-191
K. Second Consideration - Ordinance #478 - Amendment to Section 6.35, Expanding 192-193
Commercial and Institutional Recycling Program
L. Second Consideration - Ordinance #479 -Amendment to the 2012 Master Fee 194-195
Schedule - Commercial and Institutional Recycling
M. Authorization to Sign Purchase Agreement for 1850 Toledo Avenue North 12-11 196-198
N. Letter of Support for Shelter Corporation's Application for HOME Funding 199-201
O. Authorization to Sign Agreement with the Metropolitan Consortium of Community 202-209
Developers for Open To Business
P. Establishing Limited Clean-up and Property Damage Protection for Sewer Back-ups 210-213
and Water Main Breaks for Water and Sewer Customers 12-12
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM
A. Public Hearing - Preliminary Design Plan Approval - PUD #88 - Breck Addition - 214-243
Amendment#1 - 123 Ottawa Avenue North - Breck School, Applicant
B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #480 - Final Design Plan Approval - PUD #66 - JLO 244-274
Addition -Amendment #4 - 7200 Wayzata Boulevard - Jeff Lupient - Infiniti, Applicant
5. OLD BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Approval of Response Letter to Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority 275-280
Regarding Bottineau Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement Scoping
Booklet
B. Announcements of Meetings
C. Mayor and Council Communications
7. ADJOURNMENT
�
�a r ��' �
:=,ur ��._ .. 6
o � � �� �, e Public Works -
763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
1. D. City Engineers Association of Minnesota Project of the Year Award: 2011 Trunk
Watermain Rehabilitation Project, City Project No. 11-05
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Mitch Hoeft, EIT, Engineer
Summary
The Cities of Golden Valley, Fridley and Hutchinson were recently awarded the City
Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Project of the Year for its 2010/2011 Trunk
Watermain Rehabilitation Project. The award was issued to the cities for their cooperative
agreement to structurally rehabilitate watermain in the three communities using a new
trenchless technology. The locations that were rehabilitated in Golden Valley included Boone
Avenue (Golden Valley Road to Plymouth Avenue), Legend Drive (Golden Valley Road to
Bassett Creek Drive), and Brunswick Avenue (under Duluth Street).
Only a minimal number of contractors are able to complete this type of repair in the country.
Utilization of the cooperative agreement generated increased quantities that lowered the bid
prices in each city. Other highlights of the project include the project's ability to limit
neighborhood traffic disturbances, project communication, and the reduction in greenhause
gases compared to the traditional open-cut method of watermain replacement.
The City of Golden Valley served as the lead agency and the contracting authority for the
project.
Recommended Action
Recognize Jeff Oliver and Mitchell Hoeft for receipt of the City Engineers Association of
Minnesota Project of the Year Award: 2011 Trunk Watermain Rehabilitation Project.
��� �
�
=:: =:�
o �W� a e
�M�q�Y �� Public safety Police Department
P�L�CE
� 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax)
F �
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
1. E. Receipt of 2011 Police Department Annual Report
Prepared By
Stacy A. Carlson, Chief of Police
Summary
Chief Carlson will present an overview of Police Department operations during 2011. Topic
areas include crime rates, productivity, community outreach efforts, staffing, budget and
oversight boards.
Attachments
2011 Police Department Annual Report (12 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to receive and file the 2011 Police Department Annual Report.
� � �
":��� e��� ��`', -� � � �� 3� � ��^' :. �
� �' � � � � �� �r �
��� � r �x,�, x�;�, � ���
s
� � � ,� �� �; � z � h�� �y� �
��' t� ���4a � �:,� a� � ��.x z.�p�b.��'�; �u�,��° �� .
4��� F �;^ � K
� � � y � �`� N 3a'�5 i f`"'` "'�E
�;�. :g ,� ' : ' ,, - y w �,� �x,_ �.
., t f� � �tl� #;f ar
s , r �
. ui ����� ',fl � %��'�'��'�%w � '� � � �
r r{r m , �e a� '��
��� ���"`,�'�� � , �+�"�,p �`' � �`�'��ka.: s ��. �#£����.a���,� .
. "�n'""� .� e - �l , `,-��`,`'�'�,�c��� ,��r a_
� � � �, , �;,, ��� ���`�- � � � �` �'`
W'�` m,,^,.��, � , � � �.
�� r � � � a� � � �
` _, „rF r ����E��� k f,y� '"� +,�p �,.' ,� , r
��
F
k Q a
��° � ,��y'�.a �� � .y ,�'�����q� ��` . , . �
_ � ��� � 9y�c �„w ' . �,
�� '�� !;�. .� � �s,��,�,°'.r��z,s�'���a � � . . . �
�'$ � � ��-��
� s?„�� xk s A�� y, z �rc�Y ... :.r �` ��� ,� ti
�y �e. ^ � , �ae ""�' .x� . � � ' . v .n�
t �'� ,a +� ,��"�`' � �'� �� �� �� � ,��, , �a
' �� �s�'t�'`� ��C�'a� � � � '�
3. i H
� u�3� �z � e'`�-'� ��#^ a°.,m 'ys1b . �,� � . ..
�r'-��� � < €� �� �`'��'�i� '�" ss��, ?�''� '�',� i� . � � -:.
� �,
�'"� r� 3 � ����-�� ��'` � '� s�'au � � �
��.s ,� :�� � � � ��p#�° �. � ��,
; � � ���� �
� � � �,t > �` " �,��' �" � �� � .� � �� ��,r° �
� �°§+� � � '° n�+ �"° � � `�'
� ,, Yz �`+z" . ;•? -�� �° ,� ' r �����,'`
.s � .� '#�"a,.�� e�'t��. , ,� �' ��,,``rs� , � �''�
^�� ����"?,. �- � ?5 � � �, . � -�` i��: � 37{�'cg'�b�,v5��": K � ���� ��
� $� i�y 2; � � .. ��.� r���'�� '�"' '� ?.��� �f��.
� � �(�-r� �� �. N �'.} .�; "�
x'�ky�� -Y�RSS.w _ "� w „-.�'d
, ; a��''� 4 ��-��;�'�i. � ' �gsyy.."a .
���� � ,.�.,��� �:,1 � "� �.��''.r r� � .
_ �s �"r°��,e„. � '���z�`�� �.�, "�,�,�4+�� ., � . .
��� ����� ����.���� � �
_� - ; � `.�-� s�� ��
� � = , �`�< .-n:,
z�� ,��,� ;;, � :�.�
,,,.
: � ��
, : `�,�n'�^ . . .
f�.,4 �r5��.',� � .� .
�` '��.y.� � ..#� . .
r
���� � 3
r -�' a, :x -.-
� €�.., ' .. � �:°�:..
X� . . . . . ���� _
� >,_
's' . � �
ii
, ,
,:�, �
, ,, ,
�; � ��-n ��'' +
�,� � � ,� ��� [�' �4° i �
� �"`�'�'
, , '. . . ` � �. .'.
' > ' s
. . . ' �`t ',.�'qe'���. +�' -
. �� _ � ��� ��� �� I I �'I I.
. �� � .}� § j }� �� � �� �
Z?v. �: a{ �n Q" :3k= �'.
. ,s'.� t� :, +44�s�*'p��.- p''" q� x �"
�
. ��F,�� r x x*.�,N x, „� .,.�,. � � �,�8 r
� � � ��
. .. �"'.. �,; � '��4 �.�i ,�3b� s
F a� � �`a �
� � � ; ���� � �
. c. �
_� ' 9„ �.�"� e x"���,�_. ��'"� �` .��"�a.� _-,' . �* u��,,.�s����"��� ' __
' 1 I
� 1
�
GOLDEN VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Mission
In collaboration with the community we serve, members of the Golden Valley Police Department take pride
in delivering timely, impartial and professional police services,while reducing crime
through prevention education, community outreach and criminal justice partnerships.
Values
Valley Values are the things Golden Valley employees do, put into phrases that are easy to remember when anyone
asks, or when we wonder what's important. Six core values, called Valley Values, provide the City of Golden Valley
and its employees with the well-being of shared meaning and purpose:
Customer Focus
Open Communication
Positive Attitude
Know How
Teamwork
Work/Life Balance
Dear Citizens:
7he Ciry of Golden Valley once again saw crime decrease in 2011—down 5.8 percent for
serious felonies (Part 1 Crimes) and down 13 percent for less serious crimes.While 2010
had the lowest crime rate in more than a decade, to come in even lower than those historic
crime rates is quite satisfying. It speaks to the high level of community crime prevention
efforts, continued partnerships with criminal justice agencies, and deployment of staff
resources based on crime analysis and intelligence data about criminal activiry.
In 2011, the Golden Valley Police Department had its first full year of 911 dispatch services
through the City of Edina. This new partnership proved to be operationally seamless, and at
the same time it saved the City more than $100,000 in dispatch costs.
Community outreach was once again a high priority for the department, including the
Citizen's Academy, Bike Along, Night to Unite, Neighborhood Watch, Bike Rodeo, Police
and Fire in the Parks, Masters Safety Seminar, and 7-he Crime-Free Multi-Housing program.
Our Investigative Unit proved relentless in solving a one-man burglary ring involving more
than 60 metro burglaries!Additionally, it worked collaboratively with metro agencies to
solve an armed robbery spree by another one-man show.
While the high-profile crimes garner attention and media coverage, I would be remiss not
to mention the daily diligence done by our support staff in data entry, front desk and phone
coverage, Breck traffic control, records management, and countless actions that wrap up and
package the work of front-line staff into successful prosecutions and help keep the Ciry safe.
We welcome your participation in our efforts via attendance at one of our public education
courses and through continued diligence to crime prevention measures for yourself and your
neighbors. Or, simply call or email us with questions or concerns.
It is a privilege to work for and with this great Golden Valley communiry—thanks for your
help during 201 l.
Sincerely,
Stacy A. Carlson
Chief of Police
� .. ,�����°� a��'"<"� „"„�
��,, �
� v,��,
.., �� � .y
� � z�
�
�� �
� �;�
� � ��"�,�
�"
� - �
;�
,_.�:
�iu �i � � \
�.a � `� � �.� � � �e^ �y'
�. �1 _ � . ::� � � _ �. .
r a�.j ' � �� � ��
��' � `.. . .�� .
.K. � � i �y�'" Y
� 1& - .'_r3f..,
, �z��Ma�af � . # � .
.:� � a
� .,�� I II x�__.�c_... �.ua. �:s,.s. � ��"�
�s� �L a .a , �
ti.. �
8'
y .-. .-.
V � 00 �
'b � n. � n.
� � a- 0 � � 0`� �
� � k � � � � V �
�' o w a' �nz a'� z
C� c„ O
� �
�.� o ^ �
� �•� �, `�--' �
¢�'�' � � O �
� � �w � �
� Uz
V �
�
� ^
� �
1" � ,n n,
U � a� �
a� � � x
� w �v c
� � z
�
A
U
� rn y �"
•� � °' � � n. � � � � � �
•.. v�
� � x •� � � � � v a� �
.�'y � na� W � � � 00 �
�� z pv Qc� z � z
� �
�
��. ��
•�,� � � �O
� +-+ � �� °� a
� � v � �w° �
.� ,n z .�H o
�� ��� z
�
Ao
PROFILE OF POLICE OPERATIONS
The Golden Valley Police Department (GVPD) is comprised of several functions that work together to provide qualiry
customer service, including 911 response, investigations, and crime prevention. The organizational chart on page 2
illustrates how the department is structured.
Chief of Police
The Chief of Police is responsible for creating an organizational structure most conducive to maximizing resources for ef�ec-
tive and excellent delivery of police services to che Golden Valley community. The Chief must also ensure and maintain a
work environment for employees that fosters professional growth, career opportunities, and mentoring.
Patrol Division v "��
� , �� �
The largest function of the department is assigned to the Patrol Division, which � ,�� �
is responsible for handling a11911 and non-emergency calls for police service. � :� ' � I �����
... j°
Officers respond to all reports of crime and possible crime, medical situations, `��:.
and reports of animals at large or injured. !
� �
-� ��
Investigations Division 4��„�,� ��
4����N,�-�-�f . �«my.
The Investigations Division reviews all police reports of criminal incidents, and �
� � .�,
the cases are assigned based on solvability and investigator workload capaciry. {''��` z � 1a�J�
=q.:
The Investigations Division includes an officer assigned to the Northwest Metro ________ '
Drug Task Force (a collaborative narcotics investigation group staf�ed by of�icers
from Golden Valley, Plymouth, Robbinsdale, Crystal, New Hope, Hopkins, and St Louis Park) and an officer assigned to
the Hennepin County Violent Offender Task Force.Yet another officer is assigned as a School Resource Officer with the
Robbinsdale School District.With the closing of Sandburg Middle School at the end of the 2009 school year, Golden
Valley was asked to help staff Robbinsdale Middle School with a half-time employee for the 2011-2012 school year. The
assigned employee spends half his work day at Robbinsdale Middle School and the other half working as a School Resource
Officer for Independent School District 287,which is temporarily housed in the Sandburg Middle School building for
2011-2012 school year while the school's permanent home in New Hope is built. The salary for this position is reimbursed
via contracts with both school districts.
� Crime Prevention Unit
The Crime Prevention Unit coordinates a multitude of community and neighborhood
,,� �i meetings; special events such as Minnesota Night to Unite, the Bike Rodeo, the Public
� Safery Open House, and Junior Safery Camp; and public education courses offered on a
number of safery and crime topics. This unit conducts regular crime analysis and crime
` �� mapping and issues crime alerts relating to crime patterns or specific criminal actions. It
-' also conduas home safety checks and inspeas child car seats for proper installation. This
year the second Citizeds Academy was held for citizens interested in finding out about
the work, equipment, training, and procedures of Golden Valley police officers.
Support Staff
Support stafFserves a critical role in daily police operations, handling all data entry of police reports, documents, and state-
ments as well as data practices requests for police reports. Staff members also answer all non-emergency phone calls, assist
with calls involving animals, handle walk-up requests in the building lobby, provide fingerprinting requests by appoint-
ment, and assist officers with administrative issues. Through an agreement with Breck School, funding for a Community
Service Officer is provided in exchange for daily traffic control near the school twice per school day.
DEPARTIV�ENT PRODUCTIVITY
A call for service includes any police response to a 911 call,a non-emergency call that requires a police response, a traf-
fic stop, any criminal activiry spontaneously witnessed by an ofFicer on patrol, any self-initiated of�icer activity, assistance
provided to another agency, any walk-in request at the police station that requires officer involvement, or any incident
for which an officer is flagged down for help by an individual. Some factors thar can affect the number of calls for service
include an increase or decrease in the crime rate, or a public campaign encouraging residents to call 911 when they see
something suspicious in the interest of crime prevention.
'The number of calls for service in 2011 are listed below (2010 and 2009 are listed for comparison purposes).
1 - 1 1 11
17,971 19,166 18,129
Of all the calls for service during 2011 (generated either by a 9ll call or self-initiated by an officer), the four most frequent
call rypes were traffic stops, medical emergencies, alarms (residential or business), and suspicious activiry/vehicle/person.
7hese were the same most frequent calls for service for 2010 and 2009 as well. Friday was the busiest day of the week for
calls for service, followed by Thursday and Tuesday. The top three hours for calls were 4 pm, 9 am, and 1 pm.
REPORTED CRIME
When looking further into total calls for service, events that are not crimes can be culled to reveal a better understanding of
total crime. The figures below represent only the number of actual crimes reported from the total number of calls for service
for the year (all misdemeanors, gross misdemeanors, and felonies combined).
1 _ 1 1 tl .
2,678 3>162 3,204
CRIME BY CATEGORY
Gime is categorized by level of seriousness and by the elements of the criminal action. The lowest level of crimes are
misdemeanors, the next most serious are gross misdemeanors, and the most serious are felonies. Further, the FBI collects
monthly, quarterly, and annually reported crime from cities across the nation for general public safety, crime trending, and
comparative purposes. The eight most serious felonies are the crimes of murder, rape, assault, robbery, burglary, theft, arson,
and vehicle theft. The FBI calls these"Part 1" crimes. All other less serious crimes are categorized as "Part 2" crimes. The
totals for the Part 1 crimes in Golden Valley are listed below,along with a breakout of crimes by category.
Part 1 Crime Totals
1 1 1 - 11
496 527 665
Part 1 Crime By Category
�� � : - � � ' � � � � �
9 2 93 6 5 362 19
(51 residential, (55 shoplifting,
42 business) 110 from vehicle,
197 other)
Pazt 2 Crime Totals
■�_■ � � - 11
1,479 1,610 1,346
ARRE S TS
During 2011, Golden Valley police officers made 1,197 arrests, a decrease of 15 percent from 2010. Of those arrests, they
breakdown by crime level as follows:
- � � � - � � � � ���������
101 arrests 95 arrests 920 arrests 81 arrests
For more than 20 years, Golden Valley has been represented by prosecutors Frank Rondoni and Mark Schneider, of the
Chestnut&Cambronne law firm. While officers work hard to develop strong cases and arrests, those are ultimately only
as effective as the prosecution that follows. The Golden Valley Ciry Attorneys work diligently to pursue prosecution against
suspects in driving and criminal cases and ensure those perpetrating crimes in our community or on our roadways are
brought to justice.We are very fortunate to have such a talented and committed legal team working toward the livabiliry
and safery interests of Golden Valley.
RESPONSE TO CALLS
Golden Valley police officers pride themselves on providing a prompt and professional response to calls for service.To that
end, the GVPD staffs of�icers at a level assessed to be appropriate to respond to emergency calls within law enforcement
average response time standards. When a 911 call comes into the dispatch center, it is categorized as either a Prioriry 1, 2,
or 3—the prioriry level is determined by the nature of the crime or actions described in the 911 call. For instance, a car ac-
cident with known or possible injuries or a burglary in progress will be categorized as a Priority 1 call—those deemed most
in need of an immediate police presence. Other 911 calls with a less serious nature will get coded as a Priority 2 or 3, again
depending on the circumstances of the incident. A call describing an individual begging for money would be coded as a
Priority 2,while a call to report a barking dog or to report a crime that happened several days ago would be a Prioriry 3 call.
GVI'D response times for 2009-2011 are categorized below.
Priority 1 Priority 2
1 1 1 � 11 1 �1 1 � II '
4 minutes 5 minutes 4 minutes 7 minutes 6 minutes 7 minutes
Priority 3
� � � ��� � *The Edina dispatch system does not calculate our Priority 3 call times
in the same manner as our previous system, thus this figure is an esti-
8 minutes* 5 minutes 5 minutes mate, as it is notpossible to compare identically with our older data.
�
TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
The GVPD places high value on maintaining the safety of our roads and highways, and strong emphasis on traf�ic enforce-
ment and driver education is a main component of our Patrol operations. Educating the public about driver and pedestrian
safery has proven to save lives. In 2011, Golden Valley ofFicers made 4,146 traf�ic stops, issued 2,203 traffic citations, gave
2,534 warnings, were involved in seven motor vehicle pursuits, and arrested 125 people for DWI (driving while intoxi-
cated).
Of all the traf�ic citations issued to motorists in 2011 by Golden Valley Police Officers, the top three most frequently cited
violations were driving after suspension, driving while intoxicated (DWI), and driving after revocation.
1V�EDICAL ASSISTANCE
Golden Valley police officers are trained as first responders so as to provide intermediate medical assistance as part of their
regular duties.Absent a full-time Fire Department, most suburbs follow this model in rendering medical assistance to citi-
zens. During 2011, officers assisted 1,487 people in response to a request relating to a medical issue.
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
Connecting with the community in a wide variery of ways is a high prioriry for the GVI'D. Crime prevention,communiry
meetings, education, and partnerships are part of the foundation of building a strong police/community relationship. The
GVPD continually strives to increase collaboration with Golden Valley residents, business owners, and visitors.
Neighborhood Watch
° NE��NB GVPD employees conduct monthly crime prevention meetings by geographic/neighborhood zones to
CRIIU�E�RNOpp offer safety tips to residents as well as present the latest crime statistics for the respective zone. Resi-
wAT(H dents are encouraged to form or join a Neighborhood Watch group and work as a large team to keep
° their home and neighbors' homes safe by being observant and reporting any suspicious activity. `Ihese
. meetings serve as a forum for dialogue relating to public safety, city services, statute/ordinance ele-
ments,and resource availabiliry. They also of�er residents a chance to meet a number of police ofFicers.
Weimmedi��� r In 2011, the GVPD conducted nine Neighborhood Watch meetings throughout the ciry.
all SUSPICIOUt
activities�o o PE�S°"d .
�I'olice Dept. t
�' ' � �" ;� Crime Free Multi-Housing Program
�'�4� Golden Valley is home to a number of multi-housing units, and the GVPD conducts quarterly meet-
��� ��_
'�' !'� ' :R ings with the managers and/or owners of apartment complexes. �The purpose of this partnership is
� '�'� � �:' ro build relationships and offer best practices for rental leases, background screenings, evictions, and
� -.• `�'•^` nuisance tenants, among other issues. Golden Valley police officers also reach out to youth living in
r_
` �-�����,,,� apartment complexes to foster police/youth relationships, encourage school attendance,and reward
good school behavior. In 2011 the GVPD held four Apartment Manager/Owners group meetings.
Crime Prevention Training For Businesses
There are numerous businesses in Golden Valley, and the GVPD holds training sessions for business owners and employees
on topics such as premises safery, fraud and forgery, and common business crimes, to name a few. In 2011, the GVPD
conducted 24 training sessions for area businesses.
CounterAct
The GVPD pursues positive police/youth interactions through the CounterAct drug abuse prevention program. OfFicers
taught roughly 100 fifth graders at Noble Elementary and Good Shepherd Elementary about the dangers of drug use and
dealing with peer pressure to use drugs or alcohol. The six-session program culminates with a graduation ceremony, includ-
ing skits developed by students depicting scenarios of drug/alcohol use and appropriate resistance techniques.
Bike Rodeo
The annual Bike Rodeo is a collaborative effort with the cities of New Hope �
and Crystal. Participants interact with area police officers, receive bike safety ^•:• `"
. . :
tips, and get discounted bike helmet rates. About 350 area youth attended the "'ti�.�a�''�'`�'"''�'V<. �`1.<� � .
�� r
2011 event. "`��� '�4�'�'��'•* .,,�
�, �< �F.
,�.
Open House �,:
Each June, the Golden Valley Police and Fire Departments host an Open
House and invite the public to tour the building facilities,watch a controlled
fire burn, get inside police and fire vehicles, meet police officers and firefight-
ers, and learn of many police and fire operations and programs.
��;
Ride-Along Program �v Li y �
The GVPD offers the public the opportuniry to ride along with a police
of�icer for part of a shift. This can be arranged in advance and provides a first-
hand experience about what it is like to be a Golden Valley police officer.
Bike Patrol &More
Throughout the warmer months,officers pedaled their way through more than a hundred hours of bike patrol,which
proved to be successful both from a birycle safety enforcement standpoint and a youth outreach aspect. Police and Fire per-
sonnel coordinated many events in Golden Valley parks and apartment complexes, providing pizza and water relief on hot
days courtesy of the Fire Department truck hoses. 1he connections made with area kids and parents proved to be invaluable
in building positive police/youth relationships. For the second consecutive year the GVPD offered a bike-along with two
officers that covered many points of interest in the ciry. About 20 residents participated.
. _ _ --- `
4 � �-;
�'� ■'�...'$ ��- `".`:i�5
� ..■iy� � ■■■���
R
I
fa
���� ,[ ��� . •���� . �..9 K��r��el�+"/A,�""° ... �'�� �v
� �� � c
x i
" ... ��� ... � � v �� �.. .. . .
� .s.�.i.�a...
�� ..... �. .. '..-. . .
A�
4 � � ...a
': . ��L{y� �M�IMYI�4��,i`�M���.��.... _..
��. .. ��� �i'S � ` �, �
�j _ � s+�r,:sti�� �.., ,te�s.
�� .. . . �- ... . .
,. .
� �
�,.��+�,. ,,.�..,.. .� ...
�
-��
. , _ ,..., , � :.: A . .
,..� �-, ,.. `. .,.,.,,��,. . .u.n.. . ..� . � . .�..
� ,' �.,
� ,. ..,,� . ,. .,
��� . . . . � . �- ,
:-
i �-
�
-�. . . . .. ,:. �s ..
��-.. .: vfi.�,�.a.,.., ;,� !, ,� . .
'+4... ' - a.:,:..,,7 . � :
. . IIMa�'M��1� ., a
� . � u..'F;� * '^a _�.. � ...
�
2011 POLICE BUDGET
. , � � , , � . . . , -,
Personal Services
6l l0 Salaries-Regular Employees $2,927,790
6l 11 Overtime-Regular Employees 143>480
6l 50 Employee Insurance 436,975
6160 Retirement 260,215
TOTAL Personal Services 3,768,460
Supplies and Services
6320 Operating Supplies 41,800
6324 Clothing 30,500
6327 Range Supplies 11,700
6340 Professional Services 154,000
6341 Dispatch Services 306,635
6343 Telephone 15>000
6344 Use of Personal Auto 9,045
6371 Electric Service ----
6382 Contractual Maintenance 20,500
6390 Rentals 12,150
6411 Conferences and Schools 31,000
6413 Dues and Subscriptions 2,560
6440 Other Contractual Services 72,200
TOTAL Supplies and Services 707,090
Vehicle Maintenance
7401 Maintenance Charges-Labor 95>000
7402 Maintenance Cliarges-Parts 33,000
7403 Motor Fuels 91,770
TOTAL Vehicle Maintenance Charges 219,770
� ' �, 1
2011 GOLDEN VALLEY POLICE STAFFING
Administration Police Detectives Police Sergeants
Chief Stacy Carlson Detective Sergeant Dennis Arons Sergeant Dave Born
Patrol Commander Nate Gove Detective Laura Gould Sergeant Jef�Johnson
Operations Commander Mike Detective Mario Hernandez Sergeant Steve Johnson
Meehan Detective Dave Larson Sergeant Mark Persons
Sergeant Jim Roberts
Administrative Assistants Police Oi�'icers Sergeant Jason Sturgis
Stacie Budig
Amanda ohnson Officer Matt Boelter
J OfFicer Tom Buf�ie Police Reserve Ofi'icers
Nanry Stebe Kyle Anderson
OfFicer Lance Evans Joe Gibbs
Officer Dan Feldman
Community Service OfI�-►cer Scott Goebel LeAnn Hrncir
Officers (CSO) Of�icer Kristin Hoefling David Killeen
Steven Blaha Officer Dave Kuhnly Michael Lau
Dana Bokusky Ofricer Randy Mahlen Trent Prince
Shawn Eberle OfI�icer Ryan Matthew Shawn Rydell
Phil Ozmun Officer Dan Pacholke B�ad Soderling
Scoct Peterson OfFicer Jennifer Sleavin �drew Zappa
Andrew Zappa OfI�icer Terry Sleavin
Officer Christine Sloat Resignations
Crime Analyst and Support Of�icer David Staaf Andrew Jelle, Communiry Service
Services Supervisor Officer Kyle Toavs Officer
Joanne Paul OfTicer Dan Wilcox Charley Roemhild, Community
Officer Rob Zarrett Service Officer
Mike Smith, Communiry Service
Officer
OVERSIGHT BOARDS
Civil Service Commission Crime Prevention Fund
The Golden Valley Police Department uses a Civil Service The Gime Prevention Fund,which is managed by a
structure for specific positions relating to personnel.A nine-member board of directors, establishes and oversees
three-member Civil Service Commission meets periodi- a reward fund for specific Golden Valley crimes. It also
cally to discuss and review requests for approval relating funds a number of communiry crime prevention and
to a variery of personnel issues, including hiring processes, outreach initiatives via a budget funded by public and
promotional processes, and other police human resource corporate donations.
issues. Nanry Azzam Rhonda Hammons
Gloria Kumagai Harriet Betzold Paul Haun
Ben Peterson Betry Crews Jennifer Moreen
Marshall Tanick Mark Friederichs Judy Mustard
Georgia Goodwin Ralph Schulz
u f{ 'N�ry - :'
�' i :.4.� >w..�
�;i'�3 _.-T;. , � � �� � <-, � �� _
� i ��"«� cc� � d� �,�.'�?,. .
s}`�-`� ..�; � ��
�-
,. ,,
� f. "''a'
a�
SPECIAL THANKS
The Golden Valley Police Department would like to thank the residents
and business owners of Golden Valley for being partners in ensuring the
public safery of Golden Valley. Our thanks and appreciation also go to
the many private and corporate donors of our community initiatives,
and to the countless volunteers who donate the gift of time to the City
of Golden Valley. Lastly, thanks to the Hennepin Counry Sherif�'s Office
for crime lab and patrol services, the Minnesota State Patrol, and the
Minneapolis, St Louis Park, Edina, Plymouth, Robbinsdale, Crystal, and
New Hope Police Departments for assistance throughout the year.
�.� ;� . �G. . __ .
r - �_ �r�� �� ,.��4
. _; .
� . . � � - � ,
� ,. ,
� �
�- "
��� _ �- ����z � .-
� - '`��:�.�;✓-
�il � �� �
_ �',�
� ;� �`��`'�� ' � � ��
�� ��
���� ,�
��,, z� ������.
yp, z�,
,._ . r._ - �. �
:., , �-:�. r
,,s" ' � ,' '�€...'.
�'���, � � ".. 't' �Fp
§
� �g. � R?", : �'�c
� ����§ i ��'� �a��� :. � °�. ��'� `
. � �` ��,a �G� ., ��,� a '�;�rs`�
"b�''�r �' ��:'«, • � � ;`ke �`�A a`k
'.
K +� '
^# . "`�„ �� .te" . §a R h �
���.�5 F ` �' _ . �� �� t,
� « .n<
,
, }<..�� r.� �.ab . -�; "� ,� ;'��'.�.5�,�4i���r,
,.< � .., . . .. ,.- ._ . _ .
.. ,S .... . . � . . � . . �
"� �.�,� 's. �� ��� ... ..,,; .. . . .. , ,.. ,�"s,H��.�
g�
t' Y'tn'�`�s��� � s v��� ���� .
'�':,�^.�W.�b,.,�..���� . .< �.wr.��.k, ,
Council/Manager Meeting Minutes
January 10, 2012
Present: Mayor Harris and Council Members, Clausen, Freiberg, Pentel and Scanlon, City
Manager Tom Burt, Director of Public Works Jeannine Clancy, Director of Parks and
Recreation Rick Jacobson, City Planner Joe Hogeboom and Graduate Engineer Mark Ray
Also present were Manager of Engineering and Transit Planning-Hennepin County, Joe
Gladke and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman.
The meeting began at 6:45 pm in the Council Conference Room.
Bottineau Transitway Project Update
Joe Hogeboom introduced Joe Gladke, Manager of Engineering and Transit Planning at
Hennepin County who was in attendance to give the Council an update on the Bottineau
Transitway Project.
Gladke explained that the project is currently in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) phase which builds off of the alternative analysis study. During this phase of the
project some of the issues analyzed include effects on neighborhoods, noise and
vibration, effects on historic resources, and the effects on parks, water resources and the
climate.
Gladke referred to a map showing different alignments and discussed some of the key
issues with alignment D1 which would run through Golden Valley. These issues include:
wetlands, flood storage, poor soils, trails, shared operations with BNSF railroad, Xcel
towers and station locations. He added that the project considers a station location at
Golden Valley Road or possibly further to the east at Plymouth Avenue. Both potential
station locations have issues regarding parking and grading that will need to be
addressed.
Gladke stated that there is an open house scheduled for Monday, January 23 at 4:30 at
the Theodore Wirth Chalet and encouraged the Council to attend. Hogeboom added that
he also invited the Planning Commission, the Environmental Commission and the Open
Space and Recreation Commission to attend the open house.
Hogeboom added that staff would also like to have a joint meeting with the City Council,
Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation
Commission on January 30 at 6:30 pm in order to get comments and guidance on the
resolution being sought from the County in mid-February. The Council consensus was that
a joint meeting with the Council and the Commissions would be a good idea. The Council
also directed staff to submit an article to the SunPost newspaper and Go/den Valley Patch
encouraging residents to attend the open house.
Golden Valley Little League Fundraising for Honeywell Field Expansion and Naming
Rick Jacobson introduced Peter Birkeland and Pat Dale from Golden Valley Little League
who attended the meeting to update the Council on their fundraising efforts. Birkeland
stated that they have raised $40,000 of the $67,500 that they've committed to raise for
their project. Birkeland asked the Council if they would consider a no-interest loan to allow
Council/Manager Meeting Minutes
January 10, 2012 — Page 2
them to complete their payment to the City. After discussion, the Council consensus was
that the Little League Association is a value to the community and they would be
supportive of a no-interest loan.
Birkeland noted that the last time they came before Council regarding naming rights for
the Honeywell Fields the Council expressed concern about selling naming rights for city-
owned parks. Birkeland stated that the Little League Association would now like to discuss
the possibility of renaming the Honeywell Fields after long-time coach Dick Isaacson who
recently passed away.
Rick Jacobson gave a brief history of the various areas throughout the City where the
Little League association has played. After discussion, the Council consensus was to
consider a resolution allowing for the re-naming of the Honeywell fields to Isaacson Park.
Burt stated that staff will work on preparing the no-interest loan and the resolution for re-
naming the fields and will put it on a future City Council agenda.
MnDOT Local Road Improvement Program Application
Jeannine Clancy discussed a potential funding opportunity through MnDOT's Local Road
Improvement Program for a portion of the Douglas Drive Corridor Project. She referred to
a map of Douglas Drive's "Priority 1 Area" and stated that staff has determined that
eliminating the intersection of Country Club Drive with Douglas Drive and converting
Country Club Drive to a cul-de-sac east of the Optum Health driveway would be a good
candidate for this funding opportunity. '
The Council consensus was to go forward with consideration of a resolution of support of
the application at the regular Council meeting on January 17.
2012 Legislative Priorities
Tom Burt noted that the Legislative Policies approved by Council in 2011 were Fiscal
Disparities and Metropolitan Council Inflow/Infiltration (I/I). The Council discussed some of
the 2012 City Policies from the League of Minnesota Cites and the 2012 Metro Cities
Legislative Policies.
The Council requested that the following policies be considered as 2012 Legislative
Policies: organized solid waste collection, impaired waters, unfunded mandates, speed
limit control, Metro Cities I/I policies and complete streets
Council Assignments
The Council discussed their preferred assignments to various boards, commissions and
committees. They referred to the appointment on the Bassett Creek Watershed
Management Commission and discussed whether that appointment should be an elected
official or possibly a resident who may have an interest and the knowledge to be on the
Commission. After discussion the Council consensus was to interview two or three
residents and appoint one of them at a future City Council meeting.
Council/Manager Meeting Minutes
January 10, 2012 — Page 3
Council Communications
The Council discussed processes and procedures they would like to use during meetings
in order to keep them civil and respectful. Some of the issues discussed included trying to
refer to people by their last names, the use of laptops during meetings and whether or not
to set time limits when people are speaking at a public hearing. The Council consensus
was to take the limiting of people's speaking time on a case-by-case basis.
Conflict of Interest
The Council discussed what could potentially be determined a conflict of interest, what
could be perceived as a conflict of interest and the importance of keeping discussions out
in the open. Tom Burt reminded the Council that if they feel they have conflict of interest
on an item being discussed they should let him know in advance.
The meeting adjourned at 9:27 pm.
Lisa Wittman
Administrative Assistant
Council/Manager Meeting Minutes
January 30, 2012
Present: Mayor Harris and Council Members, Clausen, Freiberg, Pentel and Scanlon, City
Manager Tom Burt, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman.
The meeting began at 8:50 pm in the Council Conference Room.
Proposed 2012 Legislative Priorities
2012 Legislative Policies
The Council continued their discussion from their last Council Manager meeting regarding
potential 2012 Legislative Policies. A new policy was suggested regarding the re-opening
of the Deputy Registrar (Motor Vehicle Licensing) Office and the Council consensus was
to put them in a different order. Also, some policies were removed and some revisions
were recommended, as follows:
Policy 1 — Deputy Registrar— Consider adding a policy asking the Department of Public
Safety to work with the City to help re-open the Deputy Registrar Office as soon as
possible.
Policv 2 — Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) —Add the same language found in the Issue section
regarding capital assistance and Clean Water Legacy Act appropriations.
Policy 3 — Impaired Waters — No change.
Policy 4 — Organized Solid Waste Collection — Consider revising language making it
easier for cities to have an organized waste hauling system.
Policy 5 — Market Value Homestead Credit and Homestead Market Value Exclusion — No
change.
Policy 6 — Unfunded Mandates— Remove
Policy 7 —Voter ldentification — Remove
Policv 8 — Complete Streets — Remove
Policy 9 — City Speed Limit Control — Remove
Staff will work on the suggested revisions and bring the policies to the February 6 regular
Council meeting for review. Staff will contact legislators regarding their availability to meet
with the Council at either the March or April Council/Manager meeting.
Honors/Recognitions
The Council discussed Mayor Harris' suggestion to honor and/or recognize local schools
organizations and businesses at Council meetings. Some of the concerns expressed
included inadvertently leaving someone out, the amount of time it would take to honor and
recognize people during a Council meeting and the fact that the City currently has Visi
awards as a part of Envision. After discussion the consensus was to recognize and honor
people when it is City related.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 pm.
Lisa Wittman
Administrative Assistant
���
��
�/ P Finance
o � �4 �/ 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. B. 1. Approval of City Check Register
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Approval of check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley.
Attachments
Document sent via email.
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
��� ;�����
? ���E� �:: .
t� �/ P Finance
0 '� � N� �/ 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax)
� .
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. B. 2. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Approval of check register for various vendor claims against the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority.
Attachments
Document sent via email.
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
m,° '
� � ������ ��
Q -:��� a � Fire Department
�
�� �� 763-593-8079/763-593-8098 (fax)
' �' snserr° .
Executive Summary for Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. C. 1. Rental Property Licenses
Prepared By
Jill Lund, Administrative Assistant
Summary
As per City Code, some businesses are required to be licensed by the City. Listed below are
the license number, applicant, and fee of those who have submitted an application for
approval for multiple family rental licenses.
Mayfair Apartments
#5034 5307 Circle Down $ 100.00
#5035 5311 Circle Down $ 100.00
Valley Village Apartments
#5000 600 Lilac Drive North - Building 1 $ 100.00
#5001 600 Lilac Drive North - Building 2 $ 100.00
#5002 600 Lilac Drive North - Building 3 $ 100.00
#5003 600 Lilac Drive North - Building 4 $ 100.00
#5004 600 Lilac Drive North - Building 5 $ 100.00
#5005 600 Lilac Drive North - Building 6 $ 100.00
Golden Valley Townhomes
#5008 2120 Douglas Drive North $ 120.00
#5009 2108 Douglas Drive North $ 140.00
#5010 3354 Lilac Drive North $ 120.00
Calvary Center Apartments
#5024 7650 Golden Valley Road $ 100.00
Laurel Terrace Apartments
#4991 250 Turners Crossroad $1,132.00
Laurel Estates
#4990 5610 Laurel Avenue $ 880.00
TriPlex
#4989 6212 Golden Valley Road $ 190.00
Dover Hill Apartments
#5011 2400 Rhode Island Avenue North $1,320.00
#5012 2414 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 140.00
#5013 2436 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 260.00
#5014 2438/2440 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 120.00
#5015 2458 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 260.00
#5016 2476 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 260.00
#5017 2486 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 140.00
#5018 2520 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 260.00
#5019 2522/2524 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 120.00
#5020 2542 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 260.00
#5021 2544/2546 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 120.00
#5022 2564 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 260.00
#5023 2566/2568 Rhode Island Avenue North $ 120.00
Crosswoods Apartments
#5007 5601 Glenwood Avenue $1,150.00
Mallard Creek Apartments
#5029 8300 Golden Valley Road $ 832.00
#5030 8400 Golden Valley Road $ 832.00
Westbrook Manor
#4999 6200 Golden Valley Road $ 352.00
Valley Square Commons
#5006 759 Winnetka Avenue North $ 350.00
Copacabana Apartments
#4982 1725 Lilac Drive North $ 688.00
Stonehaven Homes
#5036 1400 Douglas Drive North $ 208.00
#5037 1450 Douglas Drive North $ 172.00
#5038 1500 Douglas Drive North $ 196.00
#5039 1600 Douglas Drive North $ 166.00
Valley View Apartments
#4993 6533 Golden Valley Road $ 100.00
#4994 6535 Golden Valley Road $ 100.00
#4995 6537 Golden Valley Road $ 100.00
#4996 6539 Golden Valley Road $ 100.00
#4997 6541 Golden Valley Road $ 100.00
#4998 6543 Golden Valley Road $ 100.00
Trentwood Apartments
#4981 9110 Golden Valley Road $ 460.00
#5025 9140 Golden Valley Road $ 460.00
#5026 9200 Golden Valley Road $ 280.00
#5027 9210 Golden Valley Road $ 460.00
#5028 9240 Golden Valley Road $ 460.00
Colonial Apartments
#5031 5743 Glenwood Avenue $ 220.00
#5032 5745 Glenwood Avenue $ 220.00
#5033 5747 Glenwood Avenue $ 220.00
Southwirth Apartments
#5041 501 Theodore Wirth Parkway $ 700.00
Valley Creek West Apartments
#5040 1370 Douglas Drive North $ 100.00
Golden Valley Arms Apartments
#5043 6150 St. Croix Avenue $ 610.00
West End Apartments
#5044 241Yosemite Circle $ 490.00
#5045 251 Yosemite Circle $ 760.00
#5046 261 Yosemite Circle $ 760.00
#5047 271 Yosemite Circle $ 760.00
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the issuance of licenses as recommended by staff.
C ,:.- -
�., .�
_��
� , o; City Administration/Council
O �, e 763-593-8006/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. C. 2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Northwest
Suburban Optimist Club
Prepared By
Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant
Summary
As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit
an application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or
denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the
City to waive the 30-day waiting period.
Attachments
Application for Exempt Permit (2 pages)
Letter from Northwest Suburban Optimist Club requesting waiver of 30 day waiting period
(1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice
requirement for Northwest Suburban Optimist Club.
Minnesota Lawfu!Gamb/ing �a9e� ot 2 si��
LG220 Appfication for Exempt Permit Appiication fee �
r '
An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: less than 30 days ore than 30 days
- conducts lawfui gambiing on five or fewer days,and before the event before the event
- awards less than $SQ,UUO in prizes during a calendar year. �I00 $�p
ORGANIZATiON INFORMA'fI�N chedc# $
Organization name Previous gambting permit number
NORTHWEST SUBURBAN OPTIMIST CLUB X-04230
Minnesota tax ID number, if any Federal employer ID number,if any
yj- � v37s�-3
TY�of nonprof'rt organization. Gheck one.
Fratemal � Religious � Veterans � Other nonprofit organizatian
Maiiing address City State Zip Code County
7001 Golden Valley Rd Golden VaNey MN 55427 Hennepin
Name of chief executive officer (CEO) Daytime phane number Email address
Casey A. Larson 763-546-8864 Casey.Larson�a edwardjones.com
Attach a copy o�of the foilowing far proaf of nonprofit sta#us.
Do nat attach a sales tax exempt status or federal emptoyer ID number as they are not proof of nonprofit status.
1„`.�onprofit Artides of Incorporation OR a current Cerfiticate of&ood S#anding.
Don't fiave a copy? 7his certificate must be obtained each year from:
Secretary of State,Business Servic�Div., 180 State t)ffice Bui{ding,St.Paui,MPI 55155
Phone: 651-296-28U3
�IRS income tax exernption[501(cj]letter in your organization's name.
Don'# have a copy? To obtain a copy of yaur federat income tax exempt letter,have an organization af#'icer
rnntact the IRS at 877-829-550Q.
�IRS-Aff'iliate of nationa#,statewide,or ieternationai parent nonprofit organization(charter)
If your organization fa11s under a parent organization,attach mpies of both of the following:
a. IRS letter showing your parent organizatian is a nonprofit 501(c)organization with a group ruting,and
b. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate.
GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION
Name of premises where the gambling event will be canducted. For rafftes,iist the site where the d�awing will take piace.
Golden Vatiey Go{f�Country Ctub
Address {do not use PO box) City or township Zip Code County
7001 Golden Vatiey Rd Gotden Valley 55427 Hennepin
Date(s) of activity(for raffles,indicate the date of the drawing)
May 24, 2012
Check the box or boxes that inditate the type of gambiing activity your arganization wiil conduct:
Bingo* � Raffles Paddtewheeis* Pull-Tabs* Tipboards*
* Gambting equipment for putl-tabs, bingo paper,tipboards, and
paddlewheeis must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the
Gambfing Contro{ Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and
bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another
organization authorized to conduct bingo.
To find a ticensed distributor, go to www.gcb.state.mn.us and click
4n list of Licensed Distributors, or call b51-639-400D.
LG220 Appiica#ion for Exempt permit
Page Z of 2 5/11
LOCAL UNTT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNQ1AtLEDGMENT
It the gambiing premises is within city fimits, If the ambtin
a city officiai must check the action that the city is coun official mu�e k the ad ontt at thet ouns��Pr a
taking on this applicatio� and sigrt the application. � ty is
���9 a�this appiication and sign the appiicatio�.
A townsfiip o�cial is not reqoire�i to sign the
applica#ion.
The appl�cation is acknowle�iged with na waiting The apptication is acknowledged with no waiting
period.
period.
The appiicatian is acknowleciged with a 30 day The application is acknowtedged with a 30 day
v+raitin9 period,and allaws the Board to issue a waiting period,and allows the Board to issue a
peRnit after 30 days{60 days for a lst dass city). Perm�t after 30 days.
The application is denied. The application is denied.
/� �/ Print county name
Print city name �(101�f f�l �GC�/�'y
On 6ehaJf of the county, I acknow/edge this application.
On behalf af the city, I acknowlerlge this app/ication, Signature of county personne! receiving app(ication
� of ci ers n el recei�ing application
�
Title Date
T� D��e � (Optional) TOWNSHIP: On behalf of the township,I
acknow/edge that the organization is applying for exempted
gambling activity wfthin the township limits. jA township has no
statutory autfiority to approve or deny an appiicatfon[Minnesota
Statute 349.166)j
Print township name
Signatare of township official acknowledging application
Title Date
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE P���fo�'m and have CE+D sign
The information pravrded in this application is m and accurate to the best of my knorvJedge. I acknosvledge
that the financial repart wi/1 be comp/eted return to the d withln 30 days of the date of our gambling
activity,
Chief executive officer's signature .�L � Date � ( 5\ ���
Complete a separate appl�cation for each gambl9ng event: Fi�anciat report and recordkeeping
• ane day of gambting activity required
• two or more consecutive days of gambling activity A financial report form and instructions wrill
• each day a raffle drawing is held be sent witfi your permit, or use the oniine
Send application with: filhin form avaiiabte at
www.gcb.state.mn.us, Within 30 days of the
• a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and activity date, complete and return the
� application fee for each event tinancial report form to the Gambiing
Make check payable to"State of Minnesota," Control Board.
To: Gambiing Control Board Q�sest+ons?
1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South ���� �Q Licensing Sectfan of the Gambling
Roseviile, MN 55113 Controi Board at 651-639-400Q.
This fortn wiN be made available in altematirne fiortnat(i.e.la►9e Prirrt.8raille)upon rr+eque�,
Oa#a privacy notice: The information Yaur organization's name and p�y�de#a aba�t your organizalion are availat�le
requested on this form (and any add�yw�����i��� to, ��m���������Q��ork
a�rr�r+ts) wiN be used by the Gambl�g wt�en r+eoeived by the Board. Ali requires aaess to the information;Minnesota's
Controf Board(Board)to determine your �er infiorrriation provided wiN be p�rtrnent of Pubiic Sa
°�����5 Q�fica#ions to be involved private data about our �'��`���%
in iaw[v1 Y Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota
9�mbtsn9 a�vities in Minnesola. orqanization until the Soard �aq��&g�d�,and Reyenue;�j;slative
Your organization has the�yh���� issues the permit. When the Auditor, nationaf and intemational gambling
supp}y the inforrnation; howeve r, if your Board issues the permit, ali �gutatcxy agendes;anyor►e pursuant ta court
organizatian refuses to supply this ��tr� ���yw��� �. ������a��a���
iM�on, the Board may not be able bo pubtic. If the B�M does not
d���e �r�n�ti�s��afiats issue a permit, all informatton � ��po�tr•��i�1 and agenpaes�for�
a�����ence,maY r�use 1��sue provided r�emains private.vuitl�tl�e which !aw�tegai order autha�iaaes a neyv us�e or
informafion��nization suppiies the exception �ya�r organization`s shar#ng�information af6er this nakioe avas 9h+en;
requested,the 9oarct wili be name and address which will and anyone with your vvritten oonsenG
able to process your organization s rematn public.
appiication.
Reset Farm
NORTHWEST SUBURBAN OPTIMIST CLUB
7001 Golden Valley Rd, Golden Valley, MN 55427
Date: February 15, 2012
Golden Valley City Offices
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Re: Gambling license application for 5.24.12
Gala raffle at the Golden Valley Country Club
Attn: Mayor and Council
For the attached application, the Northwest Su6urban Optimist Club(formerly Optimist Club of
Golden Valley) respectfully requests a waiver of the usua130 day waiting period.
Thank you.
Sincerely
----�----._..
Casey son, Pres.
Phone: 763-546-8864
Q�� �����„�,.;:
O�L� � e Public Works
=� 763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. E. 1. Purchase New Solid Manhole Covers
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager
Dave Lemke, Utilities Maintenance Supervisor
Summary
The 2012-13 Adopted Biennial Budget, Utility Maintenance, Sewer Maintenance budget
(7122-6320, Operating Supplies, page 77), includes $30,000 budgeted line item for the
purchase of solid manhole covers to aid in the reduction of inflow and infiltration of clear
water into the sanitary sewer system throughout the community. The new solid manhole
covers will replace existing manhole covers that have open pick holes. It is anticipated that
this purchase of solid manhole covers will substantially complete the manhole cover
replacement project.
Staff has received the following bids for 200 solid manhole covers:
Ess Brothers and Sons, Inc. $24,795.00
Neenah Foundry Company $27,291.25
Attachments
Quote, Ess Brothers and Sons, Inc. (1 page)
Quote, Neenah Foundry Company (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the purchase of 200 solid manhole covers, including Minnesota sales tax,
in the amount of$24,795.00 from Ess Brothers and Sons, Inc.
Quafiat�on �►TTN: BERT TR�ICY
s�nrc �s� $rothers �nd �c��ns, �nc.
18fi7 935�Court'ty R�ad 19
: ,, �.oretto, MM v5357
T63-478-2027'or Outstate 800-478-202?
I�ax 763-478-8868
C17Y; Gt}E.DEN VALLEY,MN
PRt7JEC�NAME�NUM�ER: L1C3 REPGACEMENT
t7ATE C)�B!E?i3PE�31(�IG:
ENGIN�ERI�'H�NE#:
UNi7 UNiT UNtT PR1GE+
Q���� p�$��ip�p�( WEIGH7 SURCt�AR RRICE SURGHARGE TOTAL
200 301 City af'Golden Valley laga-Sanitary lids $11s.00 523,300.00
FREIGHT �'�
-raTa�.w�icrn°a�sM�pan�nrr �
PREFAR�D SY: TRENT ESS
surchar�e ra�e per Zds: $0.�0 Subtotai $�3,200At�
Tax rate: 6.875 % Tax $4,595.00
Quantitfes are appro�mate,changes couid atter price. To�at $24,795.00
Freightis estimated on one singte shipmer+t.
Quotes Valid for 60 days
**'SPECIAL f3Rt3ER ITEMS ARE NON-RETURNABLE Accepted By:
Ess Bra#hers anc! Svns, Enc.
Jab�1Umber.
Date:
��:�r,,
��������� � � � � � �
F�G►A.1Nt3URY GC7rl�PANY -
a.. .,�st'3'f 1 C;
s' > . . _
CI'�'Y Q�'tUtJ1.D�N�'Ai1LEY
C3AT�: J�nus�ry 30?2�}i2
RE�'ERENCE:
Aftn: [)att�i�emi�e
�s�x#: �7G3}593-39b$
We are plsased fo submii fite folknvi+79 quo£afion in$ccorda�� nce wilh Yflur request. .,,�.._�
-------.—.� �xch VV� P'rice L:nits i
� L�uantity^ Cataing No. Deser�ption
125� �12:s.Q�J Eaci� !
� ?tti(} [;ach R-17�; SQLiI?PI.tiT?"'�1 LD,typc K;'S.AN3TARY SFWFR", �
machined:self-seal,{i1, no pc�s.lu�.2 dep.ci lift �y4,60U.t}0
' 3'OTAL.flF 2UU �ach R-1733 ,, �
t `
. . . �.J��i7?/,-.,'r .r �j�'�'y .'' !
!`
� �,�,Y/.� ��� t
' /a��` �
�
k �
� �
�
� �
�
f
� �
� j
� t
� �
j WEiGHT: 2.�5,Qfi0 llss �
� T4TAL.ES7'l1tilA.TEIJ i
{Exci�din�Skid�) 3
i �... �_.__—_—•--._-- ._...1
��n�h;���unun �;�'m>�,Ca,zditiurjs�.�pli•and�re ai�aii,�ale b� +:ix r.r rtk3:I ttpon'�'q�e���l�il'e ba�d above I'��� l of 1
unpai�tted.Quantities��pmxim�e.chanees eoutd alter unit}�ric�.s.�;sorn��d s�pF
�ua�rtiTias shi�ing in one cocnpl�e shipment Any orclar submitted pursuant to th"rs qual;ation shail not res�ult in a
oond�t uatil i#isatx:c�ted and�knowledgc�in�riting by Neenah Foundr�Cam�xany(SELL�R).
Pric�are 1�lid on adersLn:c:��ittsin 3�1 da5's f'rom date �scr�cl t status�Stand�d terms� �EE(�Atf�'t)tJ`1�RY CUMPANY
E2�ClIi�SL flV�I321l�iLS". :4f!ordc�s are�bjectro t�e»e��t�f bu�
ea
fdr qualitied cn�'.c�mers are Net 3�l�ays. Frices do noi inc{ude t�x. if tax exc�t a��alid t�u ._..__
e�:em�rtic�zr cer�ificate�requir�d�time t�f�order ar�.����Pplicabke tau:will be cfuirgca �Y ;f �,,,,,,...
��vu!Me.sler
Re�ional Sat�Ilireetor
� �.� �`�`.�
�,.�e:v '�"��' � .
�' �. ����.
� :
�� 3`� ��y�"v::.
2;
�� ����� Public Works
o .��: e
.- 763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. D. 2. Purchase One Dodge Van
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Rick Jacobson, Park and Recreation Director
Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager
Steve Loomis, Vehicle Maintenance Foreman
Summary
The 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program includes $25,000 for the purchase of one van
(V&E-042, page 29).
The Park and Recreation Department van meets replacement criteria set forth in the City's
vehicle replacement policy and Vehicle Condition Index (VCI). The VCI index is a tool utilized
to assess all vehicles and equipment scheduled for replacement, and any vehicle/equipment
scoring 28 points meets the category of"Needs Immediate Consideration." The 1999 van due
for replacement scored 31 points. This vehicle is in poor condition from a mechanical and
structural standpoint, and the replacement has been delayed since 2009.
The van is utilized for transporting supplies and staff to playgrounds for recreation activities
and transporting staff to training and other meetings. The van is also utilized for
transportation of elected officials, City-appointed commissions and staff as needed.
The purchase will be made under the State of Minnesota Van Contract #35446, Dodge of
Burnsville. The contract is on file in the Vehicle Maintenance Division.
The Minnesota Materials Management Division has awarded the following contract:
Contract No. Item Vendor Amount
35446 Dod e Van 7-Passen er pod e of Burnsville $21,190
Metro Transit Im rovement Excise Tax $20
TOTAL PURCHASE $21,210
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the purchase of one Dodge Van 7-passenger from Dodge of Burnsville
for $21,210.
� _�.; =� ���'��`°:,
��� � Public Works
o � ae
���- 763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. D. 3. Purchase Air Compressor Mounted on a Trailer
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director ofi Public Works
Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager
Steve Loomis, Vehicle Maintenance Foreman
Summary
The 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Water and Sanitary Sewer includes
$25,000 for the purchase of one air compressor mounted on a trailer (W&SS-047, page 88).
The City's existing 1997 air compressor meets replacement criteria set forth in the City's
Fleet Operation, Maintenance, and Replacement Policy and Vehicle Condition Index (VCI).
The VCI index is a tool utilized to assess all vehicles and equipment scheduled for
replacement, and any vehicle/equipment scoring 28 points meets the category of"Needs
Immediate Consideration." The 1997 air compressor due for replacement scored 30 points,
which meets replacement guidelines.
The air compressor is utilized for operating air tools for field maintenance, such as jack
hammers, hydraulic hammer and irrigation.
The purchase will be made under the State of Minnesota Air Compressor Contract#444983,
Zeigler Caterpillar Inc. The contract is on file in the Vehicle Maintenance Division.
The Minnesota Materials Management Division has awarded the following contract:
Contract No. Item Vendor Amount
444983 Sullair 260 Air Com ressor Zei ler Cater illar Inc. $21,094.75
Tax $1,450.26
TOTAL PURCHASE $22,545.01
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the purchase of one Sullair 260 Air Compressor from Zeigler Caterpillar
Inc. including Minnesota sales tax for$22,545.01.
From: Juliana Clarkson [julianaclarkson@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:45 AM
To: Harris, Shep; Clausen, Joanie; Freiberg, Mike; Pentel, Paula; Scanlon, DeDe
Subject: Breck Expansion Concerns
Dear Mayor Harris and GV Council Members,
We live near Breck School and have some concerns I'd like to address.
* What are the hours that construction will take place?
We are strongly against it taking place before and after M-F, 8am - 5pm & anytime
during the weekend.
� Which days of the week can construction occur?
* What is the expected process of the demolition of this building? This will be the
noisiest portion of the process that may interrupt your "home office" schedule during the
year and the enjoyment of the summer, from early in the morning through evening hours
out of doors.
* The construction process will effect not only the privacy of your home but also the
enjoyment of the park where your children enjoy their summer days. What is the plan for
construction traffic as they enter and exit the site?
* This is understood to be "Phase 1" of a two stage process. What are the far reaching
plans for Breck's structural expansion?
* With this massive expansion, essentially doubling the existing site, this would
imply that enrollment for the school could and should increase. As a neighbor,
traffic is an issue in our residential area. You have experienced one traffic "accident" as
a result of a Breck family. Will the litter along the off ramps and side streets leading in
to Breck School continue to increase?
* What will be the compensation to the change of your site line to the school? Will there
be investment made to small wooded area on the furthest eastern portion of the campus
along Natchez North?
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely, Tim & Juliana Clarkson, 331 Burntside Drive
763-377-0090
February 13, 2012
Cris Gears
Superintendent
Three Rivers Park District
Administrative Center
3000 Xenium Lane North
Plymouth, MN 55411-1229
Dear Cris,
I'm writing this letter to show support for year-round bike use,operation and maintenance of the Luce Line
Regional Trail.
As a resident of Golden Valley and a bike commuter, I use the Luce Line Regional Trail to commute to my job in
downtown Minneapolis. I enjoy and appreciate the ease of my commute during the warm months when the
Luce Line Regional Trail is not covered in snow and ice. During the months when snow and ice cover the Luce
Line Regional Trail, I need to find alternate routes from my home to the Theodore Wirth Parkway trail.
Fortunately,the distance from my home to the Theodore Wirth Parkway trail is less than a%:mile as the crow
flies. Unfortunately, I have Highway 55 and a rail road bed and bridge in my path. This winter I have had to try
many routes, depending on road and weather conditions, in order to continue commuting. None of these
routes are as safe as commuting on the Luce Line Regional Trail, because each of these routes requires me to
commute on frontage roads, city streets and/or Highway 55 with car traffic. As we all know,this has been a
wonderful winter for winter bike commuting. I worry that next winter I won't be able to commute the entire
season.
I am a strong supporter of bike commuting, including winter bike commuting. Ethically I support taking my car
off of the road during a daily commute which decreases my gas consumption, but my real reason for bike
commuting is selfish. I am a mother of two who works full time. Bike commuting allows me time to exercise my
body daily and also clear my mind before and after work. Bike commuting makes me a better employee,
mother, spouse, and person.
I hope that you will consider winter maintenance of the Luce Line Regional Trail for all of us who will enjoy and
appreciate using it year round.
Sincerely,
Gretchen Snope
1320 Unity Ave North
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Cc: Shep Harris, Mayor, Golden Valley
Joanie Clausen, Council Member,Golden Valley
Mike Freiberg, Council Member,Golden Vatley
Paula Pentel, Council Member, Golden Valley
DeDe Scanlon, Council Member,Golden Valley
Rick Jacobson, Director of Parks& Recreation, Golden Valley
Joan Peters, Park Representative, Golden Valley
From: Emily Aiverson
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2p12 11:16 AM
To: 'planning@goldenvalleymn.gov'
Subject: Theo Wirth Park/ Bottineau Transit
Importance: High
Joe Hogeboom,
I left you a voicemail and also wanted to send an email.
I recently received your letter indicating the city is considering routing the proposed
Bottineau LRT along the border of Theodore Wirth park (option D1 of the Bottineau
Transitway Plan). I live on Xerxes Ave N and experience on a daily basis the nature
and animal life that exists in the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Corridor.
Routing a train every 7 minutes through this nature area for the "travel time
convenience" of the north suburbs does not seem to justify the permanent damage to
the environment and community surrounding this area.
A few specific questions for you:
• What is your perspective on this topic?
• Will you be present at the meeting on Monday, January 23�d at 4:30pm at
Theodore Wirth Chalet?
• Was this project option already approved by the Park and Rec board?
Golden Valley's uniqueness is centered around its dedication/commitment to nature. I
would expect you would support and respect the community on this initiative and _
protect further develapment of our natural resources.
Thank you in advance for a prompt response.
Emily Alverson
Huron Healthcare
550 W Van Buren St ( Chicago, IL 60607
P 612-636-8792 ( F 503-684-4203
ealversonCa�huronconsultingqroup.com
www.huronconsultinq,qroup.com
From: ealverson@huronconsultinggroup.com [ealverson@huronconsultinggroup.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 2:48 PM
To: Planning; Harris, Shep
Cc: bottineau@co.hennepin.mn.us; Clausen, Joanie; Freiberg, Mike; Pentel, Paula;
Scanlon, DeDe
Subject: RE: Theo Wirth Park/ Bottineau Transit
Hi Joe, Shep and GV Council,
Me again. Are you aware of the specific proposal for the BNSF golden valley option?
According to the RFP I am reading the current freight rail will need to be moved to the
West in order for the new rail to be constructed (in Theo Wirth wetland/weak soil). This
is major construction —much less than what is being perceived by the public I think.
The notices I have seen to date sure make it sound like the train will run on the current
track... which is not the case. I also read that the county and railroad is stating that the
D1 Golden Valley option is cheaper and they support it. I would appreciate access to
this data as frankly I just do not believe it. In addition to moving the freight raif, the
county would be purchasing half of the land that the railway owns. How moving a
freight rail and laying new rail in a wetland (impacting our water shed) be cheaper than
laying rail on a concrete foundation in a developed area?
In general, the more I read, the more helpless it feels. There seem to be some larger
political interests (BNSF, Target, folks afraid of North Minneapolis) in control of this
decision. It makes me feel like a "list of concerns" from Golden Valley will even make a
difference. Please reassure me that it will....
Thanks again for your time.
Emily Alverson
Huron Healthcare
550 W Van Buren St � Chicago, IL 60607
P 612-636-8792 � F 503-684-4203
ealversonCa�huronconsultinqqroup.com
www.huronconsultinqgroup.com
From: Robin Price (robinhannah@gmail.com )
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:28 am
To: City Hall
Monday, February 13, 2012 7:45 pm
Dear Mayor Harris & City Council Members,
I love Golden Valley. I moved here 18 years ago from beautiful northern California and
have happily made my home in this wonderful city. I chose Golden Valley for it's
diversity: population, housing & wildlife. The proposed light rail line through Theodore
Wirth Park, Mary Hifls & Sochacki Parks wi!! destroy the qualities that I hold dear. Bald
eagles, fox,deer,owls all make Golden Valley a unique rustic retreat from busy city
life...they will disappear with the praposed lite rail.
As a first ring suburb, Golden Valley is already well served with direct roadway access
to the Twin cities, and plenty of bus service. I have taken an informal poll of my
neighbors (we all live within walking distance of the proposed rail station) and not one of
them said they would need / nor want to use the light rail. Our neighborhood will be
negatively effected by people parking on our neighborhood streets and by the constant
vibration & rail traffic on the line. The wildlife will flee.
The proposed D1 plan for the lite rail will severely detract from our whole city, our
population does not need this mode of transportation. It will not enhance any
businesses, it will only detract from my property value and that of my neighbors.
I strongly urge you to NOT allow the D1 lite rail proposal to go through Golden Valley.
Golden Valley is a gem of a small city with great housing, small business, wildlife &
charm...the lite rail through our city will take of all that away. With the lite rail, Golden
Valley could become a city that I no longer want to live in.
From: carmen dougherty-heim (mn1 heim _aol.com}
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:28 am
To: City Hall
My husband Erv Heim and I have attended Bottineau transit meetings so we are writing
to express our concerns and the hopes that you will support our wish for the line to go
on C corridor not D. We have a lavely area here in GOlden VAlley that we dont want
LRT going thru it. We feel the incomes on C can use the line, the businesses wifl be
helped & it will stop at North Memorial as they expressed at the meeting and the people
went to the meeting becasue they want it. We do not want or need the line to go thru the
wet lands and sparce pop D area just because they can go higher speeds and cost less.
We moved to Bassett Creek Drive for the wet lands, wilflife and not more transit hoping
to go high speeds every few minutes if you let this pass. I spoke with B. Shaffer when
he was in office we discsused wet lands have to be replaced but not in the same area.
Please support not having the transit go throu Golden Valley. Please send to all of the
councel members ta get involved for their support. THank you Carmen and Erv Heim,
3840 Bassett Creek Drive
From: Clark Meyer [clarkmeyer@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 6:34 PM
To: bottineau@co.hennepin.mn.us
Subject: Support for D1 Alignment (through Golden Valley) of Bottineau Transitway
To: Brent Rusco, Hennepin County
cc: Golden Valley mayor and city council members
I would like to offer my support for the D1 Alignment (running through Golden Valley) of
the proposed Bottineau Transitway. The benefits of running a LRT or BRT along a
dedicated right-of-way far outweigh the D2 option of stopping at North Memorial
Hospital and then through a residential section of north Minneapolis. The principal
benefits of D1 are the following:
• Maintaining fast travel time over the entire route. I would envision travel along
Broadway and Penn Avenue to be painfully slow, worse than the Hiawatha line
running down 5th St. in downtown Minneapolis.
• Right-of-way purchase costs and construction costs I would think would be
significantly less along an established rail line.
• Ongoing operation would be far less disruptive to the residents of north
Minneapolis.
I also think it would make sense to consider moving the proposed Golden Valley Road
station to Plymouth Avenue as recommended by the Theodore Wirth Park Master
Planning effort. Transit projects traditionally focus on where people work and shop, but
providing frequent public transit access to one of Minneapolis' premier parks also has
value.
I understand there is some opposition among some of my Golden Valley neighbors
about running LRT or BRT near or through parkland. Certainly during the construction
phase it would be disruptive; however, both LRT and BRT are quiet and vibration free. I
do not believe it would negatively impact my enjoyment of Wirth Park. From personal
experience of extended visits to a residential home that is one block from an above
ground Washington Metro subway line, I can report that electric trains are relatively
quiet and they create no noticeable vibrations —very different from freight trains and
heavy rail commuter lines.
Thank you for your work on the Bottineau Transitway and the well written draft
environmental impact statement.
Sincerely,
Clark Meyer
4947 Culver Rd.
Golden Valley, MN 55422
763-529-2630
From: Nancy Killian [nancylouise@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 6:54 AM
To: Scanlon, DeDe
Subject: Keep LRT out of Golden Valley
Dear Ms. Scanlon,
I want you to vote AGAINST any LRT coming through the Mary Hills and Sachacki Park
area. This is a beautiful nature area enjoyed by many of the local residents. It really is
one of the main gathering places for walking, biking, and meeting and greeting
neighbors of all ages. One cannot just get these nature areas back after they are gone.
What about the whole parkway situation? A light rail just doesn't fit in with a parkway
and I am sure it is not what our city pioneers envisioned when they planned for and
created Victory Memorial Drive and Theodore Wirth Parkway. I walk with several
women in the evening on the parkway 3-4 times a week. Do you know how many
people are out there with friends, family, dogs, bikes? It really is one of the only places
left in/near North Minneapolis that it is "safe" and peaceful to walk. A parkway is not a
parkway with Light Rail zipping by. The ongoing noise pollution is of great concern to
me.
The argument that is it cheaper to put in the LRT in this area is very short sighted.
Money is not the only measurement of value.
We have built and owned our home in Golden Valley since 1982. The nature areas are
a major attraction and selling point for property in our neighborhood. You may not live
by here but make you vote as if you did.
VOTE NO FOR OPTION ONE.
"They paved paradise and put up a parking lot" Joni Mitchell
Nancy Killian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keppen Kettering [mailto:keppenk@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 3:55 PM
> To: Clancy, Jeannine
> Subject: I'm a Terrified Home Owner in your city
>
> Dear Ms. Jeannine Clancy,
>
> Running the disruptive Bottineau train through multiple cherished
> parks is unacceptable in my eyes. All of the valued community events
> and the peaceful joy these parks bring to a hectic city is something I will fight to keep
—they are the reason I bought my house where I did. And it's not just about the
disruption to wildlife; it's also about the people this will affect. There has to be a better
(urban) rout that this train can take. With so few parks left in a big city, we really need to
fight to preserve the ones we have. Even a minimal disruption is not okay.
>
> I also have another issue with that is destroying me. My house is located on Kewanee
Way, and this will be IN my front yard. This is the first house my husband I have ever
bought, we bought it to start our famify in. We have already gotten the tar beaten out of
us for its value during this recession. We purchased this property for $240,000. This
past winter we were trying to refinance and it was valued at $170,000! Could you image
what this project would do to our already shattered home value?!? This would be a
devastating blow to our lives and I don't see how we would ever be able to recover.
The bottom line is this would destroy us financially through no fault of our own. This
home is already a toxic asset, and will get even worse with the train, so much so I don't
see how we would ever be able to sell. It doesn't leave us with any good choices.
>
> This community and I are owed an explanation and a plan for the future. Like I said,
this project will most certainly devastate my life. I don't see how 1 could ever recover
from this.
>
> I know the central corridor is doing a lot to help businesses that will be disrupted due
to the light rail, so what will Hennepin County do for the home owners along the
Bottineau rail? How will you help us? How will you make it so we are not the ones
paying dearly for this project?
>
> Will there be compensation for our home's decreased value from a result of the rail
location?
> What about sound proofing for our home?
> What about a safely/ privacy/ sound barrier fences?
> But even that would not save the peace outside the home that we are able to enjoy
today.
> This is a nightmare for me.
>
> I feel I have expressed my fears and concerns.
> I expect solutions.
> Thank you,
> Keppen Kettering
>
> Your communication is encouraged:
> Keppen Kettering
> KeppenK(a�qmail.com
> 651-307-2700 (Mobile)
> 2350 Kewanee Way, Golden Valley, MN 55422
From: Laurel Larsen<dzll(�a,comcast.net>
Date: February 16,2012 11:49:01 AM CST
To: <sharris(a��goldenvallevmn. ov>
Cc: <jclausen ,goldenvallevmn.�ov>, <mfreibergr�,�oldenvallevmn.�ov>,
<ppentel(u��oldenvalleymn.gov>, <dscanlon ,�oldenvalle mn.�>,
<j clancvna��oldenvallev�.�ov>
Subject: BOTTINEAU TRANSITWAY
Dear Mr. Mayor, City Council Members, and Director of Public Works,
The purpose of this letter is to express our opinion about plans for the Bottineau Transitway. We
live at 2540 Dresden Lane next to the Mary Hills and Walter J. Sochacki parks. We believe that
the light rail would have a negative impact on these parks as wild life and recreational areas if
the Alignment D1 route is chosen. It seems clear to us that the Alignment D2 is preferable for
several reasons:
• It serves many more people because it goes through a more heavily populated area.
• It serves more businesses and workplaces—North Memorial Hospital, Broadway/Penn
and Plymouth Avenue. Many more workers commute to these areas than to Golden
Valley road.
• The three proposed stations on this route are heavily used and have good parking
capabilities available.
• No infringement on a local park with it's walkways, bike paths, and wild life.
In contrast,the D1 route is through a park surrounded by low density residences and no
businesses. The one station proposed for this route (the Golden Valley Road station)has no
parking adjacent to it except St. Mary's church a block or so away.
In summary,the choice seems clear. Why build a system that few would use and which reduces
the quality of our parks?
Sincerely,
LaureClarsen DavidZook
i
-----�riginai ries5age-----
From: wtsteacker@netscape.net [mailto:wtsteatker@netscape.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:09 PM
To: Harris, Shep; Clausen, 7oanie; Freiberg, Mike; Pentel, Paula; Scanlon, DeDe; Clancy,
7eannine
Subject: Bottineau: NO on D1. YES on D2
Dear Council Members:
My wife (Robin Price) and I are strongly opposed to the D1 line and station proposed for
Golden Valley. We have lived on 8assett Creek Drive for 17 years, just about 12 minutes from
downtown.
Establishing a rail line parallel to the existing line will not only disrupt this park
setting with its wildlife and serenity but will create neighborhood issues of on street
parking, unnecessary vehicular traffic and noise and vibration issues for all our homes along
Bassett Creek.
I have not seen any studies regarding noise and vibration level effects on our homes. The
current rail movement on the existing line can be felt and heard in all our homes.
Robin and I urge you to vote NO on the proposed D1 line. It seems absolutely preposterous to
have a station established here when, as we have heard at meetings we have attended, that
very few people in our area will use the line. Traffic congestion, noise, destruction of a
natural environment so close to the city (something we all cherish) and home prices will
undoubtedly have a negative impact on the quality of life we all find so special living here.
We urge you to vote NO on the D1 line.
William Steacker
Robin Price
3900 Bassett Creek Dr.
1
To: Brent Rusco/Mark Stenglien
Hennepin County
417 N. 5�` Street Suite 320
Mpls, Mn 55401
Re: Bottineau Transitway
Gentlemen,
I am writing this to express my opinion on the above Light Rail Transitway. Under
consideration is the D1 route,which would run through Theodore Wirth, Mary Hills and
Walter J. Sochacki Parks.
Minnesota has long been a proponent of Parks and Nature areas. As the population grows
this will become harder to maintain and keep the property set aside as parkland.
Considering the D 1 route would disrupt and ruin what we already have, beautiful park
and nature areas that everyone enjoys.
The people surrounding these areas moved here because of the parks and tranquil
surroundings that were present. Routing a train that will travel every 7-15 minutes will
disrupt that and will take away what we have enjoyed for years and in the future will
lower our property value of what we have worked hard for, not what we need in these
times of declining home values.
The D2 route is more preferred. Does it cost more money? Yes, but it will be traveling in
an urban area that already has the traffic and noise. The people who live in these areas are
used to this,not to mention that a number of riders would love the North Memorial Stop
as they are a large employer in the area. In addition,the other stops would allow the
people in this area great transportation to Downtown Minneapolis.
When we built our house we picked a location in the inner ring suburbs because we
wanted a short commute to both work and the Downtown area. Others wanted to be out
further to be away from this area, now I am being asked to give up my park land so these
people can have a easier and faster way to work. I don't think that is fair. If they want an
easier way they can take the bus which has worked great for many years and will
continue to do so for many years in the future. If they don't want this they can move back
into town,where there are a lot of houses for sale.
Being"Minnesota"is about caring for our environment. Our park lands are part of this
and why would we want to destroy what we have worked hard to develop. Once we
change this we will never get it back.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mike Rocheford
2420 Dresden Lane
Golden Valley, Minnesota
The Honorabie Shep Harris ' February 12, 2012
Mayor of Golden Valley �g 1 � 2��2
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Dear Mayor Harris,
I am writing to express my opposition to a light rail transit corridor running through
Theodore Wirth, Mary Hills and Walter J. Sochacki Parks. My opposition is based on the
following points:
1. Like many long term residents of Goiden Valley, we moved here 28 years ago to
escape noise, sight pollution and crime. We wanted amenities within walking
distance, such as the above three parks, and the quiet and peace that they provide.
Our neighbors value these parks, whether or not they use them. The parks provide a
buffer of silence and visual rest, which wili be compromised should light raii run
through them. Residents of Robbinsdale and North Minneapolis value them as well.
The academic literature finds that people place a value on parks'very existence.
2. Hennepin County may consider the above route a viable alternative because the land
is cheap. It is cheap, maybe even free, as it is parkland! Yet there are likely better
alternatives and development possibilities along current commercial areas, such as
Broadway Avenue, where high traffic is aiready reflected in locai land values and the
need for development is great. People are aware of the traffic when they move there.
It is not foisted on them after the fact.
3. The"park" route seems a politically expedient alternative to a bus route down
Broadway, given Minneapolis North Side residents' opposition to Hennepin County's
proposed service center in their neighborhood. If so, why should Golden Valley,
Robbinsdale and North Minneapolis residents pay the price in lost peace and quiet?
4. Given the radial nature of major transportation arterials and their increasing density
the closer one lives to downtown, the greater the need for the calming that green
spaces and wetlands provide. Why should residents of Golden Valley, Robbinsdale
and Minneapolis be asked to give up scarce park space to support residents who
chose to live in a more distant suburb with far less tra�c density?
I ferventiy wish that the City Council will join the residents of Golden Valley and oppose the
expropriation of the Walter J. Sochacki Park and the two adjoining parks.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
//Z��/�-� /�
Robert R. Hagen
� /
�l� ���- %���
� �`����
February 17, 2012
Brent Rusco Hennepin County Bottineau Transit way, Projec�Management
701 Fourth Avenue South,Suite 400
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Re: Dedicated High-Frequency Transit Corridor to Northwest Suburbs
Wirth Park/Golden Valley Segment
Project Manager:
As a resident of Golden Valley for over thirty years I encourage the development of good light rail service to our
community,and to the entire northwest suburban region. The development of light rail is good public policy for many
reasons invoiving the environment,economics,traffic congestion, housing affordability, improved urban neighborhoods
and the curbing of urban sprawl.
We do not need any more highway improvements like the I-394 gorge. It is a monument to days gone by. Such
highways are massive and environmentally destructive; and they are increasingly unaffordable. We need alternatives.
The immediate dilemma for commuters is highway congestion, and there is no realistic way of paving our way out of the
mess that has been created. In partial alleviation of our problems, light rail should help to concentrate residential
growth at key inner city and inner suburban locations. That concentration should make housing more affordable and it
should help to curb urban sprawl.
Furthermore, light rail would make it easier for all of us—particularly seniors—to use down town and local-area sports,
entertainment,and restaurant venues. If we did not have to make nerve-racking drives,we would travel more often
iocally, and feel safer and more secure in doing so. This is particularly the case during the winter months and at night.
This is all very healthy for our cities and our future.
We should not be parochial about new transportation initiatives, but critics of the Wirth Park segment of the 8ottineau
lRT have some gaod observations. First, local observations regarding the impact of any large public works project on
iocal property values and the quite enjoyment of immediate neighborhoods needs to be given considerable weight.
Greater weight should be given local views than that of others who live beyond the immediate corridor. Near-by
residents should not have a veto, but they should have a very significant say.
The community as a whole should be heard as well. The proposed "Wirth Park route"does not serve the greatest bulk
of Golden Valley residents,and at the same time it does further bisect our community and the adjacent park land.
Some years ago an unswccessful candidate for Golden Valley City Council proposed that a light rail line should be
constructed in the HOV lane of I-394. That was an eminently good idea that would have made the best use of that costly
and ill-u'sed ribbon of concrete. But the idea was probably ahead its time. Such a project would have served a large
purtion of Golden Valley,St. Louis Park,and communities beyond,all the way to Wayzata. That is the type of light rail
our community needs,though it is an idea that is till beyond the imagination of the concrete and highway crowd that
still dominates our transportation policies.
Tom Zins
Golden Valley, MN
�815 Culver Road
Golden Valley,MN 55422
02-12-12 �B 1 � 2012
Honora.ble Shep Harris
Mayor of Golden Va11ey
7800 Golden Valley Rd.
Golden Va11ey, MN 55427
Dear Mayor Harris:
I am writing to express my concern about Hennepin County's possible plans to construct a light rail
line in Golden Valley. The proposed line would cut through Theodore Wirth,Walter J. Sochacki and
Mary Hills Parks, wildlife and recreation areas.
A light rail line through these areas would have a tremendous negative impact on these areas and the
surrounding neighborhoods. The people that designed these parks and other parks in the city were very
wise. T'hey knew that in order to have a healthy city,we needed places where people could feel a
connection with na.ture and have some quiet. Light rail through these areas, although relatively quiet,
would be very disconcerting to hear and to see.
1. Nature areas play an essential part in the physical and emotional health of people living in
the city. Sochacki and Mary Hills pazks aze profoundly quiet and are used by many people
every day for exercise and relaxation. A light rail line would cut off access for the residents
living on the East side of the park,would be a danger to wildlife that live in the pazks and to
children playing in the pazk. If the lines were fenced,this would be an added negative
visual impact.
2. There would not be a benefit to this area. We already have good express bus service to
downtown within walking distance. The possible stop at Golden Va11ey Road would not
make sense, as people would have to drive there and there is no room for parking. The stop
would be below grade and would be isolated and not secure.
3. Theodore Wirth is also such a treasure and is used by people from a11 over the city in every
season. When I tell people that a light rail line could be going through this park,their jaws
drop and then they say, "I can't believe it!" We need to fiercely protect this pazk for future
generations.
4. When we moved here twenty-eight years ago,we specifically looked for a house in a quiet
neighborhood with bus service my husband could take to work doumtown. Although we
support light rail generally,we do not think it should be used to encourage more urban
sprawl. People should be encouraged be more responsible and to live nearer to their place
of work,but in order for this to happen,we need cities to be livable and this would have to
include parks and nature areas. We love our neighborhood and do not feel the need to race
out of town every weekend to escape to a cabin. This is another type of"rush hour"traffic.
2
5. Light rail is costly;it needs to be built where is can do the most good and the least harm.
I supported light rail construction down Hiawatha and University Ave.,but these already
were busy corridors. I do not support putting light rail through residential neighborhoods
and wildlife areas. This is excessively punitive for people living in these areas.
6. Some might say,"Well,you already have a rail line rnnning through these parks". Yes,but
I believe there is only one train that runs through once a day in the middle of the night. The
effect is negligible.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope tha.t an alternative route for the light rail can be
found that will be beneficial for the areas through which it passes. If not, I hope that other options will
be found.
I encourage the Mayor of Golden Va11ey and City Council Members to do their best to protect our city
for this and future generations.
Sincerely,
S��''�-�, r���s�. _1
Sheila Bahl
From: Tammi Hall <btnhall(a�yahoo.com>
� Date: February 17, 2012 9:21:15 AM CST
To: "bottineau ,co.hennepin.mn.us" <bottineau(a�co.hennepin.mn.us>,
"brent.rusco(c�co.hennepin.mn.us" <brent.rusconae,co.hennepin.mn.us>
Cc: "iclancy��;oldenvalle� o�v" <jclancvna��oldenvalle mn. o�v>,
"m i�r mesna,goldenvalle�_gov" <m 'mes ,goldenvalle�gov>,
"tburt(�a,�oldenvalle�gov" <tburt(c�goldenvalle��>, "sharris�a�oldenvallevmn.�ov"
<sharris(�a,goldenvallevmn.gov>, "jclausen(�a,�oldenvalle m .gov"
<iclausen(a��oldenvallevmn.gov>, "mfreiberg�,goldenvalle�gov"
<mfreiber�n,�oldenvalle m .gov>, "ppentel(cr�,�oldenvallevmn.gov"
<ppentel(�p,goldenvalle�_�ov>, "dscanlonna,�oldenvalle�mn•gov"
<dscanlon(c��goldenvalleymn. o�v>
Subject: Light rail
Reply-To: Tammi Hall <btnhall�,vahoo.com>
We are thrilled that the north and northwest metro will be gaining access to the light
rail system through the proposed Bottineau Transitway.
That said, we are opposed to the option of running the light rail along the existing
railroad through Theodore Wirth Park for the following reasons:
1) The park is a wonderful recreational and natural area utilized and appreciated by so
many residents. To disrupt this natural area with light rail running every 10 or 15
minutes all day, not to mention the development of stations, would be a tragedy. I am
shocked that the county would even consider running light rail through a park. I realize
that trains run on the existing track through the park but the current disruption to the
park from the railway is very minimal due to the low number of trains utilizing the
track. This utilization is very different from a light rail train running every 15 minutes all
day every day and the attendant people traffic with a light rail system.
2) There seems to be several drawbacks to a station on Golden Valley Road - access to
the station given the current railroad is way below the road and the lack of space
for arn� parking. For most Golden Valley residents who plan to utilize the light rail a
station in Robbinsdale that offers more parking and better access would be more
convenient or at (east as convenient as the Golden Valley Road option. There is
currently a large unoccupied space (the former Robbinsdale Farm and Garden) that
would provide an excellent location for a light rail station. It might also have a positive
impact and bring traffic to the many local businesses in downtown Robbinsda(e vs.
bringing traffic and disruption to a natural park area. There are also severaf senior living
complexes in Robbinsdale that would benefit from close proximity to the light rail.
3) At the community meeting we were told that due to the potential drawbacks of the
station on Golden Valley Road a second option under consideration was Penn Avenue
directly across from the Theodore Wirth clubhouse building. We strongly oppose this
option
as the development of a station would bring even further disruption to the natural area
in the park.
The option of running light rail along Broadway through north Minneapolis seemed a
better choice to us for the following reasons:
1) The Broadway route seems to be a better solution for meeting the goal of providing
transportation to residents without their own means of transportation. According to the
presentation at the community meeting there are, in some north Minneapolis
neighborhoods, up to 50% of residents without transportation. It seems to me that for
these residents close proximity to the light rail would be a huge plus. A route through
the park and a station at Golden Valley Road is too far away for many north side
residents as they would need transportation just to get to the light rail line and station.
2) With light rail comes development of stations and adjacent areas. It seems to me
that the Broadway and north Minneapolis communities could greatly benefit from this
development, especially considering the damage to the area from the recent tornado.
The light rail should offer the opportunity to re-develop and invest in this area to create
a better neighborhood for all.
We appreciate the opportunity to learn of the light rail proposals and provide feedback.
We look forward to the positive impact light rail could bring to our community and the
opportunity to leave our car at home and utilize this great community transportation!
Robert and Tammi Hali
2936 Perry Avenue North
Golden Valley, MN 55422
z
From: Dave Bucher [mailto:dkbmd@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:53 PM
To: Harris, Shep; Clausen, Joanie; Freiberg, Mike; Pentel, Paula; Scanlon, DeDe; Clancy, Jeannine
Subject: Bottineau Transitway
Dear Council Members/Mayor,
Thanks for taking input on the various proposals for the extention of light-rail to our area. While the D 1
proposal would be geographically more convenient for myself and partner(we routinely take the 14 bus to
Downtown to ride the Hiawatha light-rail to the airport),the D2 alignment appears to make better sense for
serving a much more dense neighborhood and greater population base,many of whom would be well served by
the train. The stations at North Memorial and along Penn Avenue would undoubtedly be much busier than a
more isolated station on D1 at Golden Va11ey Road.
We would like to voice our support for the D2 alignment in your deliberations in representing our
neighborhoods of Golden Va11ey.
Dave Bucher
Bill Cooper
4000 Bassett Creek Drive
i
� �� � ,�� ��� �
a�������� `��� � � _ /
F � Z � �e � .� �
G�� �� 1��� �
�� � � �
� C� ;,�� �f-- ���L� --� � ��� �-� ��. �� w,-�
kJ �1 C� �11�1,�.,�Q
U� �c�C✓C� � c� ,,� �.� ��-�
� `� �� �
� � G� � �� ��/ �� b �x�-� `— ��`�-'f ����.�
�..�.� � �.-�
lf ,��., �, - . � c,c,��i.� �-� `�'�'�`� .�-� c��
���
�� 's c�C.� , c,,� � l�c,� �`� , G� ��.cti� �; �'�'�
,
� �c.� (.�-�. � � � `��i� � t
• � � �� C� �`� � Gra
��� � �� � ,
' 4'�.� r-��1�,�
� �'� r�,��-� ��--, � �=�� C[�..�,t.P � �r��
� � � ""V
Gc� �— �- c.,c�� � � �o�,��C'e ,
{ u�.�' (,� G , �r, �c to��� C'.,�Ccc tn cv
�� ��� � - , , � �
�;�,. ��-uc�--- �-e-�� �r.�.� �-�t�,e Cc�o �- - ,�.�.;
�� J �
� i
� �� ��� L�a�� �� �,� ����
� ,
+�� l. �� G:t3�c�'C'� G� �Cn-r1r�c � G� C�-�
�" ���
�c-�' �cc,�'�.'` C�`r��s �� S� � ��=:,��I
� � ���
�
�����
�ea�
�� ���
�����
�
..
Stop the light-rail obsession. (We'tl save money if we get ott�.) � Star'1'ribune.com Page 1 of 5
.......................................... ._
YOUH�3IIIDETOTI-I67WINCITIES Logln Register Help SubscriberSarvfces BuyAds Store Silelndex �archthe,SlarTtlbune , +, . �
.:,.:�. v.•: :�..:�.�...:: :.;;5•��5:�:>::�v ti• ..M1. ;,...:.;..,.,,;.. �
:<<;:'i'':;:k;:;:��:tj:��ti�:i c;�.''.;%::;:i;;��
K. } � ..:,...:., ..... �::,;::;
t t '� . }^ :�r�':;:'�
:i S;j;i!:7�`.C�E'''',�3`��i°�5�:�'i'3:°w,1,s'a�''�,��3,i:%;:;::
�����"��1�� � Comrnentaries :,:: ,;;,.v: ,::... �. ,.�, .:. ..
<t:.;�N� ��'� ���¢ ����:::,:;::<.�:::>:.
� . . . ����>�..�:���:������:�>
�.,,... ,.:.r
N�vs Local Sports Buslness Politics Opinlon Lifestyle Entertainment Obituaries ciassineds nutos Housinfl .�ot t�
EdkpdrN OwColumnlots CommeMarfa� Cartoon� Leriars --' .
------------.._...�-------------. __..._/ —
►�m� Opinion at����s�. • Stop the light-rail obsession. (We'll save morn
StoK� the light-rail obsession. (We'll save money if
get c�ff.)
Article b��:DAVID OSMEK Updated:February 1,2012-8:32 PM 194 comm�m� �resizo texf 'j3 priM buy raprinta
..:...:.:....
' �''
:.,.n,,,., edll �•.r;,;, afd .
: �
: ..........
� :x:;,a a� ^ $ '„ ba
I+ :.� -�:�
'� . � . . L•'S6C�.4c9t?�xwi.:%.:i:;�; .
::.. . . _ . .. . ,. .,
:.. :
,,�.
<'•,..��``>. � •; :.....::.:.,.,.:::.,.:.�.....I's ' a sinEt:::.::..::...;:.,..:
niawama ugnt=refi i�ne is . 99 cenis bi'[n�s'cos
,� � , °�%.::.=:'<; :�°` leaving almost 60 perce�t to be subsid'¢ed by the public.
k .. �,, �,..
< t:£;;<;..
'��"'��.,'�., i
:;
,�. ; But ihis is not the true cost of a ride,as it does not include the 3U-
; ::••::�..
......,. ......,
� �..':' ' ��`��j� year amoAized costs of 6ondi�g for the build-out of the line.Adding
"^:{r ' �:^;;;��;'�'• ...� those costs in,at a 4 percenl bond interest rete,a single ride actuall
�� ::f ;<;::sr;�sa'��� cosis$6.42,which means eech ride is subsidized b 85 ercent.
::i>':;:3::, r Y p
:�,�;;::
N a(amily of tour rid�s the Hiawatha Line to a Twins game,ihe publ
is paying a lotal o!543.36,while the dders are coniributing$3.96.
Right now,we are peying over$15 miilion each year to keep the
Hiawatha Line operating.Adding in the amortized cosis of building
Ihe line,iPs more than$56 millron in laxpayer dollars each year.Ye:
some of the costs were federaily(unded,and other revenue stream�
are bearing some o1 the burden.Bul wilh frillions of dollars of deficit
spending,do we reaMy want to add to the debt thet tuture generatior
will pay/or decades to comeT
Using the Hiawatha Line es a model,let's project the costs o(ihe
Cenlral Comidor and Southwest qnes.Assuming the same level of
revenue irom ridership and operating costs,the Cent�al Corridor will
require more than i17 m�lion each year in operating subsidy and
more than a55 miliion a year for the amo�iized costs.The new
5outhwest line will require more ihan$12 million in operating subsid
wilh more than S72 millio�in amo►tized costs.And don't(orget abou
' Northstar commuter raN,which has an annual operaNng subsidy oi
over$13 million,wlth emoAized costs of over$18 million.
Once all four lines are in operation,the public wili pay more than$51
million each year lo just operate Ihe lines.The actual cosls.with tne
I , amortized buildout cosfs induded.'s just sAOrt of a quar�r W a tilr
�s MCh jYef.
I� � 11Ms is tor a mode of transpottalbn A�at,in nN cpinlan,h�t•
�agligibta effect on traflic congestion and would be more
eaonomically provided by existing bus servbe.Even worse,we are
teking money away irom building or rebuilding crilioa!highway
� in/raslructure needs to operele this incredibly expensive mode of
trensportation.5tarving tha res!of our transportation system in(avoi
d a mo�e expensive,less efflcienf and totaliy inflezible lighl-rail
aysiem is the epftome of polilics trumping common sense.
Propo�e�is will cite the fact lhat light rad will create jobs.But sa will
building lane miles and b�idges.Minnesota Depariment of
Transporlation studies have proven that raads have a benefd/cost
ratio greaterthan one,mea�ing that the economic benefil of a projei
outweighs the actual cost of the improvement and wfll pey for NseK
over lime.Most road and bridge projects have ratios of three or four,
mea�ing that S3 or$4 ot ca�ulated value is retumed tor every doliai
oi costs.The Hiawetha Line was projecied at 0.42 in f 999,meaning
ihat for every dollar spenl,we receive 42 cents i�vatue.
When you look at Ihe cosis,building more ligfit rail lines is nothing
shorl ot a money pN that will bank►upt our state and our nation.It is
time to cut our losses and stop Ihis madness.
David Osmek is a member of the Mound City Council and a
Republicen candidate for t��state Senate.
http:/i�vww.startribune.com/opinion/otherviews/13 8524389.html
H.��.�.E.�.�, ��1 C. Ac�ess To Emplayment
W��r�viefe quality�ervices to assist indrviduals in achieving their g�uls trr Iive and u�ork in the c�mmunity.
Corporate Office 2950 Pfetro �r,;Ste.308 5801 Duiuth`S#.,Ste.3d5 19'14 Ueiversity kve.,Sie. !65
3001 Metrt► {3r.,Ste. 300 Blunmington,MN 5�425 Golden Valley,MN 55422 St.Paul;MN 55104
Bloomington,MN 55425 phane 952.253.IOSQ phone 763,t31A260 phone b51.64SSZ3t
phone 952.252.I p44 €ax 952.252.1452 fax 763.231.02b9 fax 651:645,5969
fax 952.252.1048
February 3,2012
Dear Mayor Harris and Gdiden Vailey City Councii members:
My name is Pam 1'essmer. I am the Chief Pragram Qfficer of H.O.M.E.S. Inc.and Access To Emplayment.
i am writing in support of the Li�ht Rail line proposed in Galden Valley.
We,are a socia)service agency loca#ed here in the Metro a'rea and in Virginia,Hibbin�and Grand Rapids,
Minnesota. We support peopte in achi�ving their goals to live and work in ihe community. tn the Mefiro
area,the majority of the support provided is vacatit�nal services to individuals to find and maintain
commun�ty ernployment: The individuals ave support rely aimost exclusively an public transportation to
get to and from wbrk. Since we have people working directly for comrnunity business,we do not
provide the::tran$portaCion to the individuais we serve. Last year,we served 11�ind`rvidual throughout
Hennepin from our Golden Valley offfc�'and just aver 300 throughout the'Metro area.
Adding the light Rail line,in my opinion,just makes sense. it links Goiden Vailey to other Metro suburbs
and MinneapoGs. It gives peopie wha rely an public transportation another option to get where they
need to go. This'is especiaUy true for those with disabilities and seniors. We have offices in
Blaomingtan andSt Paul both near#he current and soon to be Light Rail iines and have seen firsthand
the impact ta the communi#'tes where the lines exist. In my opinion, it has been a positive one,
increasing businesses and revitalizing neighborhoods:
Thank you for considering rny comments in rnaking your decision about LigMt Rail: tf you have any
further questions or need further ciarification, piease do not hesitate to cal!or email. My phone
number is 952 25Z-1044 and my email is ptessmerCa�homes-mn.org.
Sincerely, :
°----..,,>
f�����-'�(�='"
Pamela K Tessmer
Chief Pragram Officer, H.O.M.E.S., Inc and Access Ta Employment
pt
�05 i,12th Ave.W,Ste.6 ZOQ NW 1st Ave,Ste.7 401 7th S�$E,Ste. I 3535 9th Ane.W,Ste. 138
Virginia,MN 55742 �ra�d Rapids,MN 55794 Graad Rapids,MN 557�4 Nibbing,MN 55746
phone 218.749:Q$44 phone 11$.3�b.�03b phane 21$.327.15Q0 phone �1$.Z83.$911
fax 218.741.06$2 fax 218.32b.2b$5 fax Il$.327.2117 fax 218.1d3,71bQ
City of Golden Valley
Attn: Public Works-Jeanine Clancy
7800 Golden Valley Rd
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Subject: Light rail in Golden Valley
Dear Ms. Clancy,
I am writing you today to protest the light rail initiative in Golden Valley that
would run through the parks of Theodore Wirth, Mary Hills and Walter J. Sochacki.
The parks and green areas of Golden Valley are what set it apart from other suburbs.
There is an abundance of wildlife in these parks, including deer, red fox, squirrels, rabbits
and an occasional coyote. Additionally there are grasses, wildflowers, soaring birds,
walking paths, picnic areas and a general sense of peace and harmony.
These parks are heavily visited by the local residents and provide a place of
recreation for our young adults and teens. I have personally taken on the responsibility of
keeping these parks clean and picked up for the last 23 years. You will be hard pressed to
find a discarded container or other debris anywhere between 36�' Street and Golden
Valley Road. There are many residents like me that love, respect, and value the unique
experience these parks offer.
The equipment needed to build the light rail will flatten the vegetation(look at the
dredging project this past suinmer for flood abatement), drive off wildlife and will disrupt
the peacefulness and tranquility of the parks and surrounding suburbs. The light rail is
scheduled to run every 7-15 minutes during rush hours and every 30 minutes early in the
morning and late at night. At present the only traffic through these parks is the BN
Railroad 2x a day(l0am and 4pm).
Clearly, surrendering this precious asset to a light rail project that primarily
benefits those in oiher communities is a loss to the residents of Golden Valley that is
uncompensated. Living close to this corridor, I will see the value of my property diminish
as will my neighbors.
Please, you must say no to this project and save a big part of what makes Golden
Valley the special place it is.
Sincerely,
William Linder&
Sue Linder
2640 Kyle Ave N
Golden Valley, MN 55422 �
�,!_l.� ,�`JVIi�.r°�� 1�-',�'�.�r'f1� �'�'"'e"!2=r... .:�.i.�l.ss�'L.P.�! C 3. (j'�!�,���, � `j �; �.
� i,� �.r � ,� �!' � /
`�' .--4./�'�/��t�.,/�� ���,s;.^ ,L `L�':tX `�.'"i,^'^��r:'..'a-^'-�Y-„-.,��-y-^�, j .
) . � •n! r s v./�� 7 L'� (.71,�.
�%t..¢!i/Vl�-- J�{./,_.�.. �...ti, l.V�".�;'--<_k.-C'�'t,,, '�°'!�':n_�l7-�'...G'.'�..�-- �.t.� G�.�•�/
� l'��(J;l,i•:.�.r �/`�-�.�C- / �a�_�..�, ` f ;i .
� J�-. ! , 't.a✓ C:�-�y�, t_�C.� ,� � .�,,!;�'.�,., : %
,
,
;Y ��,.� � c�--�:�...�.�....
; z , . -, _.__ -
; , _ -• , ._r .
c/"�'�-- .Z,.. �..r.2_..-r :�.-;..,:;.� c.k--trt.-�:` ��.:.-.,...1 � . f� .
' ^....C.../"t...'l-,4 'L.,.l-�'!-'�:..-.. /
(R..�
C\if�...s`•C�s� f.i'-'i �� `..+1.•t"�Y�°' ��:...j �..�.L/��-N"1�/�'_f^�L.+����4 l��J,{ �l�"'i"i/�4�
Y `
�y'L�,��"�.��� *l.V.,..i�:_.. ��j, �I� .,:-'� �.'- . � . . ..
� `l�f� ,(�-C.,1-t,� � —'l!'��..c.,L_� Y�.`.�
.1 � �~`"
�.��:�.�_,n=��. ��.- �.�r�.- �:� `> �l _
�---- �'f�.�_t.
� �-� �i. 'r^.-�-�.—:�.,_ (^,-cr...:,��...�� „�_ cr,.��� f -
.. � ���
�� �� r��„�.� ��.�� �:� �,�� �,� .�,...�:.�.,.;`�,'
,;, ` ���(, �=c �.,.�..� :�1
;=i---���..:-�.:z..��._::.: , C,��:�1.�,. �;t..�:..�ti.. �-�---� ��--��.��,,� :
/ {r,
,
l,i.*""t.�:��'Y.'Y'Y.--L"v�Vrij{,..d �'4rL...''�., ,��..,.�.,`� .y`L�� .
Y
\�"' �i�il;4'4 ���N- V��"4'S��y �� tA°�- �'�'�fL.,�.C� �°�/-�..�'� Jy,:�ti"�L�.� . .
r
:
��� '��`'�� b �
�
� - ���� � �� � . . . . . . .. ..
� 1�-c:.�.�.���.
� i � o r��'i �°�� ��-� �` ,
, �.--' u -�K.t-:',-�
�
�:�.-��� V t°.,IL��...� y'�-,�� ��:�, �j c� �{ r1.._ �2_
� l
�,
-���--�.�v�Z. -G'�:.._.t_� � ft,.�--s�-�-a.,.�,�.— �`"'l.`Z��-c,�
�
' _-r�''Z1✓k.1 ' .o
\ , �.-�`l�l�'+`Z-'"^•L`
v
�`7
��yvr..t. C`ai},'v; � �'� � �- / �
� :
��1�.��� ��f���_�,-- ,���-��
� ,/ . 1
��� � �
f:��. �.�`-�-, �'�:.�.C ,� �� ,� �-��_ �JAN 3120�?
��' G c:� v.=�,,:_��.��v� �G`�� �C,�.
� 1� L. f
._L�^��'�2� `�u.,� � f,, � �� � ��
G'
,�/�'�G�- <�.� ����.�,� �
� ,
_�/ �� R2zG� --����..-���-t_... �c.� �' �, , ..�:�..,�i..;:c� _...-2�' •x�'
�
�a�--s'�-�'�-.c�--� �- J>��ca.� �.,,�, ���.c�� �.c_%z�.� ��� -�'<<� ��-�.
�� /
..� _L..�� 1 Ci�yi /�-�i(_.�.
G`L _���-G�•�
. l> ., ".�. C..� 1 _� �L. �z_.Z.'� C,. -
, 1 � �%
�`�'
.
f, /{/ / • � a� �``..
.�/ "�� .. �. J� _�', l✓� l� G'��.-��✓��l:.i (/
� ����'i_-�--���,[- G� _���(...-G� _�'zi-' �,y w� �
�r G
�
/� dL�yr es
' �C:-�� C'•. /"`�.
���-'�'',.��c� - C.��.-.-c.�� �''�.--� ��-�P �,�-
�i�-�22. ,F��I.�s.1' f,��-"' "`._``'�-- . �� -�'�-t'i ��G%-�-'e~ C•'_1�< _.�! G2-�.�
c�-Y2iL.--
t�t� r�
� /� �" (�'y � � , � �`......e_ ` �f� �-+2... . ��'� �
"r' �J."L/�--�•(.� �LL_/Z../ ��lJ' w-1/�/ G'✓�� .G.-�✓�'L•L�—
/ . .n�
a� �� i'
...�,�j ' __�__ < ' '�_C..l,r� �� °'."���....
L•
�2-�--- —��--� .--r� -�-�--�=.-�L ,..�-y �`.__,<".�Z�• � � �
`` �� . .
_�� ��
c�G,� �--v`.-E-.�' �� �-C. ,,�i .�.��,.,�, �i��-" �` � ..�- -�-r'�--��-�-.,' ��
��t:,� � ,- �� .,r ✓
, �
�, , C.. ��
G� �Z.z.-�� ~ �t�'-a...�� � ��-� �'—z`�-'��-- .,.y�-� v�-/`'cti- .�z�i __.��'Yt a--4-�
c'i
' ,�r+ • ,
/j , , .f�/'--�--✓�-d�L
//� �A �� fj/(/// �( /� 2 _ / / /!/� �...�',��'.
C. 4" ���� :�.•�y�../ { ..y./ �..G'�� /�` i �L/l/
/ /
/ �' 1
J fj ^ ' � GL�/U�✓�� '-�,,�H�.[,4..Z,
t�2� ' ,r;-1-. C-�Y-C- !�'�"'� �
.-Y//�• _��jL��C�2LC t�,•�-� �3 �ic...L_..• �L,�-�.iGc. v'"� �
/f ��
` ti'^ �-- �G C`_�.t_-�—rtJ •
/ %/��y� �t, �,,_-tie.�t./ �yyz-[_=
.��-i�.di-.'� �l. E•ti'l./ �� / ^
� !�
/ G.j` ! � 7
' ' ��:�,..u��� �
;
, � , .
���- � �/ � �� �
a-'4 ��-L`�� '� .
,
�� �7.
.�� � =�C���.�. �--�� �
/, ., /.�.,,, �`�n ��'..� �/�ti .�`�"�� •2
Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall,
Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday,
January 23, 2012. Chair Waldhauser called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Planning Commissioners, Cera, Kisch, McCarty, Schmidgall,
Segelbaum and Waldhauser. Also present was City Planner Joe Hogeboom, Planning
Intern Bryanna Vidden and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioner Kluchka
was absent.
1. Approval of Minutes
November 14, 2011 Regular Planning Commission Meeting
MOVED by Schmidgall, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to
approve the November 14, 2011 as submitted.
2. Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development Amendment— Final
Plan — 7200 Wayzata Blvd, Lupient Infiniti — PU-66 Amendment#4
Applicant: Lupient Infiniti
Addresses: 7200 Wayzata Boulevard
Purpose: To allow for the expansion of the showroom and entry of the Infiniti
dealership plus a car wash addition to the north end of the building.
Hogeboom reminded the Commission that they reviewed the Preliminary Plan for this
proposed PUD Amendment at their November 14, 2011 meeting. He referred to the site
plan and noted that the applicant has added the striped walkway in the parking lot as
requested by the Planning Commission and that they've also submitted a landscape plan
per the City Council's request.
Segelbaum asked if staff has looked at the maintenance of the private roadway as was
discussed at the November 14 Planning Commission meeting. Hogeboom said the road
was inspected and that there were some potholes, but no major maintenance concerns.
Segelbaum asked if staff wrote a review of the landscape plan recently submitted.
Hogeboom said staff did review the plan but did not write a staff report.
Ken Nordby, NAI Architects, showed the Commission pictures of the existing building and
pictures of how the building will look with the addition of the car wash, expanded entry
way and glass feature wall.
Waldhauser referred to the west side of the building and asked if there has been any
thought given to installing deep-rooted plants to help with water run-off issues.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 2
Jeff Lupient, Applicant, stated that five or six evergreen trees were planted on the west
side a couple of years ago to help with the water issues.
Waldhauser opened the public hearing.
Stacy Hoschka, 6400 Golden Valley Road, asked if the rain spouts on the building are
directed toward the green space.
Lupient explained that most of the water goes to the west toward the green space. He
stated that they also put in a curb along the west side of the property and there is a
culvert that runs into a rock basin and then into the street.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public
hearing.
Kisch stated he feels the applicant has incorporated everything that was asked of them.
The Commissioners agreed.
MOVED by Kisch, seconded by Schmidgall and motion carried unanimously to
recommend approval of PUD #66, Amendment #4 to allow for the expansion of the
showroom and entry of the Infiniti dealership plus a car wash addition to the north end of
the building subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These
plans were prepared by NAI Architects and include the following: existing and
demolition site plan, proposed site plan, existing floor plans, orientation plans, floor
plan — building A, floor plan — building B, exterior elevations and landscape plan.
2. All recommendations and requirements outlined in the memorandum from Deputy
Fire Marshal Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
dated September 27, 2011 shall become a part of this approval.
3. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code.
4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations,
or laws with authority over this development.
3. Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development Amendment—
Preliminary Plan — 123 Ottowa Ave. N., Breck School — PU-88 Amendment#1
Applicant: Breck School
Address: 123 Ottawa Avenue North
Purpose: To allow a portion of the existing two-story building (the upper school)
to be demolished and replaced with a new four-story building.
Vidden gave a brief history of the site and explained the applicant's proposal to demolish
and rebuild their upper school building. The proposed new building will include a
renovated media center, consolidation of administrative services, additional small-group
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 3
meeting space and updated mechanical and electrical systems. She stated that horizontal
expansion of the buildings is limited by wetlands, floodplain and the existing athletic fields.
She added that there is no planned increase in enrollment and this is the first phase of a
larger project. She showed the Commission a rendering of the proposed new building and
noted that the new building will be 70 feet in height compared to the existing chapel bell
tower which is 96 feet in height.
Segelbaum asked if staff believes Breck manages traffic satisfactorily. Vidden stated that
the amount of traffic should not change as a result of the proposed construction because
Breck's enrollment is expected to stay the same. Hogeboom added that the Public Safety
Department works with Breck regarding traffic management and the construction traffic
will be managed during the building permit process.
Segelbaum asked if staff requested the proposed green roof. Vidden stated that the City
did not request the green roof, Breck proposed it. Hogeboom added that because Breck
is not proposing to expand the footprint of the building by more than 10% they will not be
required to go to the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission for review.
Wendy Engelman, Business Manager, Breck School, said they are very excited about this
project. The proposed changes will better fit their curriculum and they will work with the
City to address any traffic and safety concerns.
Waldhauser referred to an email sent by a neighbor concerned about the hours of
construction. She asked if that issue will be addressed during the building permit process.
Hogeboom said the hours of construction can be addressed during the building permit
process and the City will work with Breck at that time, however, the City's noise ordinance
typically allows noise from 7 am to 10 pm.
Cera asked about the next phase of the project. Engelman stated that future plans call for
a similar addition to the west for the middle school.
Kisch asked if there is any way to shrink the floor to ceiling space so that the building is
not so talL
Dick Strassburg, Owner's Representative, explained that they have been working with
their architects regarding the height of the building because they have the same
concerns. He explained that the future phases will be kept at the same height and the
buildings will "step back" so as not to feel overwhelming. Engelman agreed that the height
of the building is a concern and noted that the chapel is the main focal point of the school.
Kisch asked about the type of construction being proposed. Strassburg stated it will be
steel construction. He explained that the classrooms will have 10-foot high ceilings with
an additional 2 feet for mechanicals.
McCarty questioned the need to double the space if the enrollment is not expected to
increase. Engelman reiterated that the proposed addition will have small group meeting
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 4
and tutorial space, seminar rooms and media space as well as additional classroom and
lab space.
Schmidgall questioned if it is within the Planning Commission's jurisdiction to question
Breck's design and program issues.
Waldhauser opened the public hearing.
Barbara Busick, 4736 Glenwood Ave, said she assumes construction will start in the
summer and asked how long construction will last and if there would be construction on
weekends. Hogeboom said construction would probably start in June.
Busick asked if there is a process to inform the neighborhood about the time construction
will occur. Hogeboom said there is no process however staff will be working with the
applicant on construction hours and traffic issues. Busick asked if it would help to call the
City with her concerns before building permits are issued. Waldhauser suggested Busick
email or write her concerns to Hogeboom. Waldhauser also noted that there will be three
more public hearings with opportunities for neighbors to express their concerns. Busick
suggested that Breck use multiple streets for their construction traffic in order to spread it
out.
Douglas Weiss, 400 Natchez Avenue North, said he is concerned about the building
height and his view being changed. He said he would like to see drawings of how the
building will look and that he would rather see a three-story building instead of a four-story
building.
Stacy Hoschka, 6400 Golden Valley Road, asked if Breck will be required to submit a
Stormwater Management Plan and who would review the plans. Cera noted that the City
Engineer will require Breck to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and obtain a
Stormwater Management Permit.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public
hearing.
McCarty said he is concerned about the height of the building. He said he thinks the
proposed height would be more appropriate if their enrollment was increasing. Kisch
agreed that the proposed height is a concern, but he doesn't share McCarty's concerns
about enrollment. He commended the design and said it is a great project to move
forward on, but he would like Breck to push their architect to reduce the height. He said
he would also like to see more articulation on the east and west sides of the building.
Segelbaum said he supports the proposal and is pleased to see Breck investing in the
community. He added that he is concerned that traffic may increase with the amount of
added space.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 5
Cera said he doesn't believe that the construction traffic will be anywhere near the current
morning and afternoon traffic. He said he is in favor of the proposal and he likes the green
roof and that the footprint of the building is not expanding.
MOVED by Cera, seconded by McCarty and motion carried unanimously to recommend
approval of the proposed Preliminary Plan for PUD 88, Amendment#1, Breck School
subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These
plans were prepared by Holabird & Root and include the following: G1-3 site plan, G1-
9 green roof& ground coverage diagrams, G1-10 overall 100, 150 & 200 level floor
plans, A2-1 foundation floor plan, A2-2 100 & 150 level floor plan, A2-3 200 level floor
plan, A2-4 300 level floor plan, A2-5 400 level floor plan, A2-6 500 level roof plan,
penthouse plan & 600 level penthouse roof plan, A2-7 150 north classroom renovation
floor plan, A4-1 and A4-2 building elevations, A4-5 building sections, new upper
school elevations and diagram comparing height of existing chapel bell tower and
proposed new building.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Deputy Fire
Marshal Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated
January 10, 2012, shall become part of this approval.
3. The.recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Public Works
Specialist Eric Eckman to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development, dated
January 13, 2012, shall become a part of this approval.
4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code.
5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or
laws with authority over this development.
4. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendment—Amending Section
11.70 "Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations" —ZO00-89
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Purpose: To consider amending the amount of parking required for certain
uses.
Vidden stated that she studied the City's parking requirements in response to a request
by the Planning Commission to determine if Golden Valley requires too much parking.
She discussed her study which included comparisons with other cities and explained that
staff is recommending to amend the parking regulations to require fewer parking spaces
in nine of the use categories.
Waldhauser asked for examples of which properties would be impacted by the proposed
amendments. Vidden stated that her study showed that Golden Valley is on par with other
gimilar cities.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 6
Waldhauser referred to the parking requirements at ball fields. She stated that ball fields
are heavily used and there may be complaints about there not being enough parking
spaces. Kisch agreed and said currently the City tends to approach parking as requiring a
minimum amount rather than a maximum amount. He referred to Walgreen's recent
variance request for fewer parking spaces than required because they didn't feel they
needed as many as the City Code required them to have. He said he likes parking
language that puts more emphasis on a use and puts a cap on the number of spaces
allowed rather than a minimum.
Segelbaum asked if comments or complaints regarding parking could be examined.
Hogeboom stated that comments or complaints are dealt with on a case-by-case basis
and that there isn't a data base kept on file.
Cera referred to the requirements for ball fields which states that 1 space is required per 6
seats. He questioned how "seats" are considered when there are no benches or
bleachers. He also questioned the requirements regarding gas stations and if a service
stall or a space at the gas pump is counted in the parking totals. He questioned if the
numbers proposed for gas stations were inadvertently raised instead of lowered. He
suggested ball fields and gas stations be looked at again.
Hogeboom said he would talk to the Park and Recreation Department about the parking
at ball fields in order to get a better idea of how many spaces to require.
McCarty referred to the "adequate plan" language and asked how that is defined because
it seems ambiguous.
Schmidgall said he thinks this draft was a nice effort and is moving in the right direction.
He added that the City almost always reduces the amount of parking required for
developments when asked to do so. He said he would be inclined to recommend approval
of these proposed changes and take another look at it in the future if needed.
Waldhauser opened the public hearing.
Stacy Hoschka, 6400 Golden Valley Road, referred to Meadowbrook School and stated
that it is unique because it is also a community center. She questioned the number of
parking spaces required for those two uses. She added that parking is a really big
problem at Meadowbrook and there aren't nearly enough parking spaces.
Hogeboom explained that the regular parking requirements in the Zoning Code don't
apply at Meadowbrook because it is a PUD. Therefore, the PUD Permit would dictate the
parking requirements.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public
hearing.
Waldhauser said she would like to have staff provide some examples of properties where
adjustments could be made and examples of properties where there aren't enough
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 7
parking spaces or where there are too many parking spaces. Hogeboom said that staff
will assign specific businesses to Pl�nning Commissioners to review over the next several
weeks. Commissioners will be asked to look at whether or not there is adequate parking
onsite, whether or not snow is stored in the parking lot and if parking lot usage increases
or decreases at different times of the week. Staff will revisit parking regulations with the
Planning Commission at a later meeting to see whether or not the Commission
recommends making additional changes
MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Kisch and motion carried unanimously to table the
discussion regarding amending the Zoning Code Section 11.70 "Off-Street Parking and
Loading Regulations"
5. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City
Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings
Waldhauser reported on the Bottineau Transifinray open house she attended on January
23 and reminded the Commission that there will be a joint meeting with the City Council,
Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission on January 30.
6. Other Business
Waldhauser stated that she attended Planning Commissioner training and she would like
to share the MnAPA Citizen Planner Handbook with the rest of the Commission at a
future Planning Commission meeting. The Commission agreed that meeting on a
scheduled meeting night would work best.
7. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 pm.
David A. Cera, Secretary
Golden Valley Human Services Foundation (GVHSF) Meeting
Minutes
November 14, 2011
Present: Daniel Blumb, Hilmer Erickson, Elissa Heilicher, Brenda Hayle, Chris Monroe,
Diane Nimmer, Connie Sandler, Toots Vodovoz. Also attending: Jeanne Fackler, Staff
Liaison.
The meeting of November 14t" was called to order by Chairperson Sandler via conference
call.
October 10 minutes: Sandler moved and Monroe seconded the motion to approve the
minutes of October 10. The motion passed unanimously.
Other Business:
Council presentation: Sandler will be attending the Council meeting on November 15tn
updating the Council on the following:
2011 Name Change
2011 Events (Run the Valley and Golf Classic)
Community Foundation Solicitation Letter
Sponsors and Supporters of the 2011 events
Approval for 2012 budget and funding allocations
RespectFully submitted,
Jeanne Fackler
GVHSF Staff Liaison
JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES
Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope
Meeting of December 7, 2011
The Golden Valley— Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission meeting was called
to order at 1:30 pm, in the City of Golden Valley Council Conference Room.
Commissioners Present
Tom Burt, City Manager, Golden Valley
Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal
Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope
Staff Present
Tom Mathisen, Director of Public Works, Crystal
Randy Kloepper, Water and Sewer Superintendent, Crystal
Paul Coone, Operations Manager, New Hope
Bernie Weber, Utilities Supervisor, New Hope
Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Dave Lemke, Utilities Supervisor, Golden Valley
Pat Schutrop, Administrative Assistant, Golden Valley
Minutes of November 2, 2011
MOVED by Norris, seconded by Burt, and motion carried unanimously to approve the
minutes of the November 2, 2011 meeting.
Countv Road 9 Forcemain Replacement (Mathisen)
Stantec/Bonestroo submitted a proposal in the amount of$715,000 for the total
estimated construction cost for the project that includes installation of a 24-inch pipe.
The TAC recommended approval of the pre-design field work ($7,150) and the
engineering portion ($50,050) for a total of$57,200.
MOVED by McDonald, seconded by Norris, and motion carried unanimously to approve
the Stantec/Bonestroo proposal for pre-design field work and engineering in the amount
of$57,200.
Discussion took place regarding the inspection of the watermain work during
construction. The TAC will discuss the best approach. Stantec included $7,150 in its
proposal for inspections, but that amount is for on-call issues that might arise during the
project construction.
A recommendation from the TAC regarding the inspection will be brought to the JWC.
Joint Water Commission
December 7, 2011
Page 2 of 3
Water Interaction Studv Update (Clancv)
The TAC has not received an update from Barr Engineering Co. Clancy will follow-up
and contact Brian LeMon at Barr.
Air Conditioninq Proiect Update (Lemke)
Currently, there are operational difficulties at the Golden Valley pump house during the
summer due to inadequate cooling systems. Environmental Process, Inc. was retained
to develop options, prepare construction documents for mechanical and building
modifications, and complete construction project management. Two quotes were
received for the project, excluding electrical. The low quote received was from
Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors in the amount of$18,323. An electrical quote was
received from Detail Electric for $8,300. Completion will be done in 2012.
Golden Valley staff is requesting $10,000 to be moved from the Replace Pump, Motor
and Starter (JWC 2011 CIP project#8) to Replace Air Conditioner (JWC 2011 CIP
project#11).
MOVED by Norris, seconded by McDonald, and motion carried unanimously to move
$10,000 from the Capital Project Financing from #8 Replace Pump, Motor and increase
$10,000 Starter to #11 Replace Air Conditioner. CIP #8 will be $37,000 and CIP #11 will
be $40,000.
MOVED by Norris, seconded by McDonald, and motion carried unanimously to approve
the quotes received from Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors in the amount of$18,323
and Detail Electric for $8,300, for a project total of$26,623; and appropriating funds as
proposed.
Other Business
1. Burt indicated that the Minneapolis Park Board may be interested in building trails
near the reservoir in Golden Valley.
2. Cost of services and the Minneapolis contract. This item will be discussed at the
next meeting.
3. The backup water supply well at New Hope has a floor drain that needs to be
addressed.
4. The JWC would like to have a tri-city council meeting in March or April 2012 to
discuss the backup water supply plan.
5. Golden Valley staff met with Bernie Bullert, Minneapolis Water Works, and staff from
Stantec/Bonestroo on Monday, December 5, at the JWC Golden Valley pump house
to discuss meter replacement. Stantec will provide Golden Valley with a proposal
involving digging a new pit and filling in half of the old pit so that Minneapolis can
install its new meter.
Next Meetinq
It was the consensus of the JWC to cancel the January 4, 2012 meeting.
Joint Water Commission
December 7, 2011
Page 3 of 3
Adiournment
Chair Burt adjourned the meeting 1:50 pm.
Thomas D. Burt, Chair
ATTEST:
Pat Schutrop, Recording Secretary
GOLDEN VALLEY OPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSIQN
Regular Meeting
Minutes
November 28, 2011
1. Call to Order
Sandler called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.
2. Roll Call
Present: Roger Bergman, John Cornelius, Brad Kadue, Kelly Kuebelbeck, Bob
Mattison,
Emily Piper, Anne Saffert, Jerry Sandler, Dan Steinberg, Rick
Jacobson, Director of Parks and Recreation; Jeremy Foreman, Golden
Valley CommonPlace; and
Damon Struyk, Golden Valley Resident.
Absent: None.
3. Aqenda Chanqes or Additions
None made.
4. Approval of Minutes — October 24, 2011
MOTION: MOVED by Mattison and seconded by Kadue to approve the
October 24 meeting minutes. Motion carried unanimously.
5. CommonPlace Golden Vallev—Jeremv Foreman
Foreman gave the commission a description of the new website, which is in its first
year of operation. He explained the site's primary function is to serve as a
community bulletin board for news, events, announcements, services, group and
organization information, discussion groups, etc. Anyone can subscribe to the free
site to begin receiving the daily informational email messages. Foreman explained
other cities are beginning their own CommonPlace website but are separate from
one another. Foreman said there are currently about 9,000 users across the
country.
Sandler asked if the content is monitored. Foreman said there are 2-3 field
organizers monitoring all content. He said they have been very lucky and not had
any issues with posts and content.
Mattison suggested getting the athletic associations on the site. Foreman said he
does have plans to meet with staff to get that set up.
He encouraged all Golden Valley boards and commissions to subscribe.
6. Wirth Park Update— Damon Struvk
Struyk, Golden Valley Representative for the Wirth Park Redevelopment
Citizens Advisory Committee, said the project is in its second year and started in
the Wirth Lake area. Last year, it expanded to the entire park with concern over
the effect on Theo Wirth Golf Course. Staff and design experts met in early �
November to brainstorm ideas and produce a master plan for the entire park.
Those plans are close to be finalized.
Steinberg asked about a potential location for a dog park. Struyk said a location
behind the Golden Valley Humane Society is being looked into as a potential
location. Potential parking options were then discussed.
Struyk said a new Welcome Sports and Education Center may be added and will
consolidate winter recreation and golf operations into one building.
Sandler asked how much longer the committee plans to meet. Struyk said they
may wrap up by January or February.
Bergman asked there were plans for additional rest stops or drinking fountains.
Struyk said he was not aware of any plan to do so.
7. Honevwell Little Leaque Proiect
Jacobson reported that the field will not be ready for opening day, but may be
ready for the fall league.
8. Updates
Jacobson reminded the commission that the December meeting will be
cancelled due to the holiday.
11. Adiournment
MOVED by Bergman and seconded by Steinberg to adjourn at 8:00 PM. Motion
carried unanimously.
BCWMC November 16,2011,Meeting Minutes
���� � ,�z�
Bas�c����ilh, ���ree�k��V�'ater�hed���nagem����c���sion ::
� G
� i �� � �
5r ,��� ,_� d
� ���i1�E',S i��������Il�O����`BI�I�?�T�� `��.�� �� � I U�� ;
w°�U , a . . . ., �� �',.���� �_.t°.�P . . �� �.. . � . .!i,''�" � . . ., .M�a w�'�IiiD��!�a '. . .
� �i�o-l� ��ii �� ����� �'i�'.
� '�1����'�u�����:- � i i �� �-s � p�
''� r':�
c� �u }r i,k �a� ri
. . .,. rru.er�r . _ . . .. , . .... . . �s „ r , . . .. .. e°�n,r_�i , ,._, . .
The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission(BCWMC)was called to order at 11:30 a.m.,on
Wednesday,November 16,2011,at Golden Valley City Hall by Chair Loomis.Ms.Herbert called roll.
ROLL CALL Counsel Charlie LeFevere
Crystal Not represented Engineer Karen Chandler
Golden Valley Commissioner Linda Loomis,Chair Recorder Amy Herbert
Medicine Lake Commissioner Ted Hoshal .
Minneapolis Not represented
Minnetonka Commissioner Jacob Millner
New Hope Alternate Commissioner Dan Stauner
Plymouth Alternate Commissioner Judy Johnson
Robbinsdale Not represented
St.Louis Park Commissioner Jim de Lambert,Secretary
Note: Crystal Commissioner Pauline Langsdorf arrived after roll call
Also present: Laura Adler,BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee,St.Louis Park
Derek Asche,BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee,Plymouth
Jeannine Clancy,BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee,Golden Valley
Christopher Gise,Golden Valley Resident
Ferdousi Gramling,BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee,Medicine Lake
Dave Hanson,Alternate Commissioner,City of Golden Valley
Dan Johnson,Crystal Resident
Tom Mathisen,BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee, Crystal
Liz Stout,BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee,Minnetonka
��.;� '
4 2.AFPI�q"�ANL'p���,����EI�A A�h�b'��UN�ENT AGE.�}� ' ' ° � n;
�. ,���� �iu i� �� .
Chair Loomis asked if the Cooperative Agreement for the Main Stem Restoration Project,Irving Avenue
to Golden Valley Road,was ready.Mr.LeFevere said he is still waiting for comments on the draft from the
1
BCWMC November 16,2011,Meeting Minutes
City of Minneapolis.Chair Loomis said that the discussion of the agreement should be pulled from item 7A
on today's agenda.Commissioner de Lambert moved to approve the Agenda as amended and the Consent
Agenda.Acting Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion.The motion carried unanimously with six
votes in favor[Cities of Crystal,Minneapolis,and Robbinsdale absent from vote].
,�,
-� ti '�r t � �u,i �
�:'i��`i'�'��T, ,��IPT.�`�'Ql��TU��r ��FI�A IT�NIS
� i�. � .,.. z .. .
No citizen input on non-agenda items
�� laplaq ,1� ��� 6 ��Oh'' � , � 1�4 la � '
, � .°����������M�}l�; , �"�.� �. } • . � , . . h� .. . . . '��h�i�Y i� � .
I
4A.Presentation of October 20,2011,Meeting Minutes.The meeting minutes were approved as part of the
Consent Agenda.
4B,Presentation of Financial Statements.The BCWMC's November 2011 financial report was approved as
part of the Consent Agenda.
The general and construction account balances reported in the November 2011 Financial Report are as
follows:
Checking Account Balance $505,601.79
TOTAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE $505,601.79
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION CASH& $2,305,754.74
INVESTMENTS
Investment due 9/16/2015 $512,059.83
TOTAL ON-HAND CONSTRUCTION $2,305,754.74
CASH &INVESTMENTS
CIP Projects Levied—Budget Remaining ($2,263,755.52)
Closed Projects Remaining Balance $41,999.22
2011 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $431,859.17
4C.Presentation of Invoices for Payment Approval.
i. Kennedy&Graven—Legal Services through September 30,2011—invoice for the amount of
$3,991.90.
ii. Barr Engineering Company—Engineering Services through October 28,2011—invoice for the
' amount of$19,207.07.
iii. Amy Herbert—October Secretarial Services—invoice for the amount of$2,531.73.
iv. D'amico-ACE Catering—November 2011 BCWMC meeting catering—invoice for the amount of
$361.52.
2
BCWMC November 16,2011,Meeting Minutes
v. Judy Arginteanu—Yard Clean up Education Article—invoice for the amount of$300.00.
vi. Lakeshore Communications—Public Communications—September hearing notice—invoice for the
amount of$149.60.
vii. Sun Newspapers-Public Communications—September hearing notice—invoice for the amount of
$388.84.
viii. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission—WMWA Workshops—invoice for the
amount of$532.05.
ix. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission- WMWA General Expenses—invoice for the
amount of$25.93.
x. Watershed Consulting—Geoff Nash Administrator Services through 9/15/11—invoice for the
amount of$1,301.35.
Commissioner Hoshal moved to approve payment of all of the invoices.Commissioner de Lambert
seconded the motion.Bv call of roll the motion carried unanimouslv with six votes in favor[Cities of
Crystal,Minneapolis,and Robbinsdale absent from vote].
4D.Reimbursement Request from the City of Ptymouth for the 2010 Plymouth Creek Project.Ms.
Chandler reported on the reimbursement request,the status of the project,and the Commission Engineer's
review of the reimbursement request and supporting documents from the City of Plymouth.She stated that
the Commission Engineer recommended reimbursement to the City of Plymouth at the requested amount
of$250,263.44.Ms.Chandler also stated that the Commission's�nancial report needs to be updated to
reflect the correct approved budget amount for the project.
The Commission directed Ms.Chandler to call the BCWMC's Deputy Treasurer to discuss the correction.
Acting Commissioner Judy Johnson moved to approve the reimbursement to the City of Plymouth in the
amount of$250,263.44.Acting Commissioner Stauner seconded the motion.Bv call of roll the motion
carried unanimouslv with six votes in favor[Cities of Crystal,Minneapolis,and Robbinsdale absent from
vote].
4E.Reimbursement Request from the City of Golden Valley for the 2010 Main 5tem Restoration
Project.Ms.Chandler reported on the reimbursement request from the City of Golden Valley,the status
of the project,and the Commission Engineer's review of the request and supporting documents.She stated
that the Commission Engineer recommended reimbursement to the City of Golden Valley in the requested
amount of$222,788.32.Acting Commissioner Stauner moved to approve the reimbursement to the City of
Golden Valley in the amount of$222,788.32.Commissioner de Lambert seconded the motion.Bv call of roll
the motion carried unanimouslv with six votes in favor[Cities of Crystal,Minneapolis,and Robbinsdale
absent from vote].
Ms. Chandler stated that currently when a reimbursement request comes in to the Commission,the
Commission Engineer seeks direction from the Commission before reviewing the request,which adds time
to the process.She asked if the Commission would want to streamline the process and give general
direction to the Commission Engineer to work on the reimbursement requests as they are received.The
Commission and TAC members commented on the idea.Commissioner de Lambert moved that the
Commission authorize the Commission Engineer to review the reimbursement requests for Commission-
directed projects as the requests come in to the Commission.Commissioner Hoshal seconded the motion.
3
BCWMC November 16,2011,Meeting Minutes
The motion carried unanimouslv with six votes in favor[Cities of Crystal,Minneapolis,and Robbinsdale
absent from vote].
4F.Status Update on Grant Expenditures for the 2010 Plymouth Creek Restoration Project and
the 2010 Main Stem Restoration Project.Ms.Chandler explained that just this morning she heard from
the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources(BWSR)that the two Commission projects that had
received the 2010 grants are far enough along to be considered complete by BWSR,which means that the
Commission will not need to apply for grant extensions.Ms.Chandler said that there are several tasks that
do need to be done regarding the grants before the end of the year.She said the Commission needs to get
the eLINK reporting done,needs to update the water stories and add pictures,and next month Chair
Loomis will need to sign some financial items.Ms.Chandler said that after those tasks are completed,the
Commission will be able to get back its ten percent that had been retained until project completion.The
Commission directed Barr to complete the necessary tasks on the grants.
-� . "� �.. - : . �i��(4i0i n&' �i�'�4� a"`"" "' _ -�ri�S
�a.����4����kJ. . �`��i�j���i�! �' n � ���i�i���� ��t
�
� ���` �'�`r�� ��� � ��� �� �
. . . . . . .. . . . . , . x.n�. . . . �
Receive comments regarding the proposed Sweeney Lake Outlet Reconstruction Project in Golden
Valley,a proposed BCWMC Capital Improvement Project.Mr.LeFevere commented that this public
hearing is not required by state law but is required by the Commission's Joint Powers Agreement to allow
the member cities to comment on the proposed project. Chair Loomis opened the public hearing and called
for comments.Hearing no comments,Chair Loomis closed the public hearing.
�. i oii �. .,,....: :. .� ir P �itii';��U n ; M1��
`�� � a'3'�i� s - ' « 71 S..,.
�. �..�C!�8������� I i ��^ -
�.. �
-'. -'' .. ���..� �i('_;. :.' .
A. Resolution 11-10 Ordering 2012 Improvements—the Sweeney Lake Outlet Reconstruction
Project-and Approving the Cooperative Agreement with the City of Golden Valley for
Construction of the Project. Acting Commissioner Stauner moved to approve Resolution 11-10.
Acting Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion.The motion carried unanimouslv with six votes in
favor[Cities of Crystal,Minneapolis,and Robbinsdale absent from vote].
� e'� �� s d��.� �
��� ��4�.�',�'"��°����"3 h�4�l��a�����i���il���a���� Iii(�.i 4� .'�IV i ' t .
}�"":�r � � i"° � . � �
A. Cooperative Agreements for the Main Stem Restoration Project(Irving Avenue to Golden
Valley Road)and the Wirth Lake Outlet Structure Modification Project and Resolution 11-11
Approving the Cooperative Agreement for the Wirth Lake Outlet Modification. Chair Loomis
commented that the agenda had been amended to remove the Cooperative Agreement for the Main
Stem Restoration Project since the agreement was still being reviewed by the City of Minneapolis.
Mr.LeFevere commented that the draft Cooperative Agreement for the Wirth Lake Outlet Structure
Modification Project has been revised per the Commission's direction at its last meeting.Mr.LeFevere
discussed the changes as indicated in the marked up copy of the agreement handed out at the meeting.
Acting Commissioner Stauner brought up a question about the de�nition of major maintenance.Mr.
LeFevere provided the de�nition as written into the agreement.
Commissioner de Lambert moved to approve Resolution 11-11 approving the Cooperative Agreement
for the Wirth Lake Outlet Modi�cation.Commissioner Hoshal seconded the motion.The motion
carried unanimouslv with six votes in favor[Cities of Crystal,Minneapolis,and Robbinsdale absent
from vote].
4
BCWMC November 16,2011,Meeting Minutes
B. TAC Recommendations.
i. Pressure Transducers.Ms.Chandler said that since volunteers were offering the use of a
pressure transducer for the winter and volunteers were offering to install the transducer,the
TAC decided it could ask the volunteers to move forward and install the transducer on
Medicine Lake. Commissioner de Lambert reported on the installation of the transducer and
provided details about the data collection such as the potential pitfalls of the site.
Ms.Chandler said that the TAC recommends that the Commission evaluate the performance of
the transducer after ice out and if it has worked as the Commission expected then the
Commission could consider purchasing one or two transducers and using them to collect the
lake level data.
The Commission discussed who would take care of the data and reporting and wondered about
the costs involved in the reporting.Ms.Chandler said that Barr Engineering typically has put
the lake level data into a table but that she didn't have a cost for that work.Chair Loomis asked
how the data is used.Ms.Chandler said it is used for historical data and for verifying
watershed modeling results.Mr.Asche said that the TAC is interested in seeing the results.
ii. Evaluation of RFQs and Recommendation on Providers of Engineering and Technical
Services.Ms.Chandler reported that the TAC evaluated the qualifications of the eight�rms
that responded to the Commission's request.She said that the TAC ranked the�rms and
provided the Commission with a list of the following three firms,in addition to Barr
Engineering as the fourth firm,based on the rankings: Wenck,WSB,and SEH.Acting
Commissioner Stauner moved to approve the Commission accepting the TAC's
recommendation of the�rms as providers to the BCWMC for Engineering and Technical
Services.Acting Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion.The motion carried unanimously
with six votes in favor[Cities of Crystal,Minneapolis,and Robbinsdale absent from vote].The
Commission directed Ms.Herbert to send letters to the respondents notifying them of the
Commission's decision.
iii. Next TAC Meeting Agenda.Ms.Chandler said that the TAC will need to meet to discuss the
channel maintenance proposals in either December or January.She said that the only other
month that the TAC is scheduled to meet is April in order to review the Commission's CIP.The
Commission discussed some of the items that may be on the Commission's upcoming agendas
and decided it needed to discuss its Next Generation Planning Process before making a decision
about the TAC's next meeting,in case there is something the Commission would need TAC
input on by December.
[Commissioner Langsdorf arrives.]
C. Next Generation Planning Process.Ms. Chandler said that the Commission received an inquiry
from Brad Wozney of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources(BWSR)asking about the
status of the Commission's Next Generation Planning Process.She said that she learned the request
was due to BWSR wanting to make sure that the Commission didn't complete its issue prioritization
process without getting input from its stakeholders.She updated the Commission on the work that has
already been done in the process and outlined some of the next steps that the Commission could take
such as having the TAC review its responses about issues and finishing the last questionnaire about the
issues.Ms.Gramling volunteered to work with Ms.Chandler to organize the TAC and Commission
responses that have already been completed.Ms.Chandler said that there wouldn't be enough time
5
BCWMC November 16,2011,Meeting Minutes
before the possible TAC meeting on December 15`to get the information organized and out to the TAC.
Acting Commissioner Stauner said that the Commission also should consider the new standard GASB
54 that has been adopted by the Government Accounting Standards Board.He explained that it
requires governmental entities to adopt a policy designating fund balances and needs to be in place by
the end of this�scal year.
The Commission discussed whether it needs to meet in December.
Commissioner Hoshal asked if the Commission was interested in forming a committee to investigate
hiring another administrator.Chair Loomis said that the Administrative Services Committee is trying
to sit down and meet with Doug Snyder from the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization to
see if instead of the Commission hiring another administrator it could contract with another watershed
for those services.Chair Loomis said the Committee is trying to schedule a meeting.She said that she
didn't know if the Commission ever directed the Committee to meet and this topic is something that the
Commission should discuss in terms of what does the Commission want to do to explore options.
Commissioner Hoshal asked if the Commission should discuss the succession of the Chair.Chair
Loomis discussed the end of her term as an elected of�cial to the City of Golden Valley and the end of
her appointment to the BCWMC.
Commissioner Hoshal moved to direct the Administrative Services Committee to explore the review of
a new administrator position and a review of the succession to the Board of the BCWMC.
Commissioner Langsdorf made the friendly amendment that the Commission give authorfzation to the
Executive Committee to pay the December invoices if the December meeting is cancelled.
Commissioner Hoshal approved the friendly amendmen�Acting Commissioner Johnson seconded the
motion.The motion carried unanimouslv with seven votes in favor[Cities of Minneapolis and
Robbinsdale absent from the vote].
Acting Commissioner Stauner moved to schedule the next TAC meeting for January 5`h and to
authorize the Chair to cancel the December meeting if there is insuf�cient business for the Commission
to meet.Commissioner Millner seconded the motion.The motion carried unanimouslv with seven votes
in favor[Cities of Minneapolis and Robbinsdale absent from the vote].
D. Draft BCWMC Policy Manual.The Commission reviewed and made edits to the remainder of the draft
Policy Manual starting at Section 3 ExternaU Internal Operational Policies on page 16.The
Commission identified language in speci6c policies that needed revising and directed Ms.Chandler and
Mr.LeFevere to revise those policies.
E. BCWMC Meeting Calendar for Remainder of Fiscal Year 2011.See discussion under agenda item 7C.
��sI�.`� `� 3 ` �;����dl'i ,. yv r �i�� �� a
�':�(����������� i i
. .a,. P,9 "a�i'���id.�� '
Chair:
1. Chair Loomis reported that the BCWMC would be participating in the Honeywell Sustainability
Fair tomorrow at Honeywell.
Commissioners:
1. Commissioner Hoshal announced that the BCWMC has been sent a letter from the Medicine Lake
City Clerk communicating that the City has appointed Ferdousi Gramling as the City's Technical
Advisory Committee member to the BCWMG
6
BCWMC November 16,2011,Meeting Minutes
2. Commissioner Hoshal announced that he had received a communication from Terrie Christian of
AMLAC[Association of Medicine Lake Area Citizens]that today is Give to the Max day for
charities and that she highlighted the Minnesota Lakes Association.
3. Commissioner Langsdorf reported that she received an e-mail from Hennepin County Green
Partners with its e-newsletter.She said she would like the e-mail forwarded to the Commission.The
Commission directed Ms.Herbert to forward the e-mail to the Commission and TAC.
Committees:
Education Committee
1. Commissioner Langsdorf asked the Commission to authorize Ms.Herbert to go through the
billings from the Commission's watershed education partners and identify which partners still
haven't submitted invoices for the Commission's 2011 fiscal year.
2. Commissioner Langsdorf moved to approve the Commission participa�ng in the City of
Plymouth's Yard and Garden Expo in the spring and to pay the$60 registration fee.Acting
Commissioner Stauner seconded the motion.The motion carried unanimouslv with seven votes in
favor[Cities of Minneapolis and Robbinsdale absent from the vote].
.. � q si ,r� t ;,iv�6^9 aill�i�W� ( „i
���������� ' '..: _ ih i� _ :' t J(a
. . ,. ',.. - � '; � i i
. . . . . _ .. , x�.a `�..- . . �i � i � . .�^:.rte G i�,W- . . �°, _ .
The meeting adjourned at 2:00 p.m.
Linda Loomis,Chair Date Amy Herbert,Recorder Date
Jim de Lambert,Secretary Date
7
�
�� �: . ..
Planning
0 �,� � � �, e 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
.�.
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. G. Approval of Conditional Extension for Filing of Plat and Submitting Final PUD Plan
Application - PUD #107 - The Towers at West End - Southwest Quadrant of I-394 and
Highway 100 - Duke Realty, Applicant
Prepared By
Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Summary
At the March 3, 2009 City Council meeting, the Council approved the Preliminary PUD Plan
and Preliminary Plat for The Towers at West End PUD No. 107. The Council has approved
five 180-day extensions since the original Preliminary PUD approval.
The Preliminary PUD Plan and Preliminary Plat provide for the construction of a 4,000+
space parking deck attached to several office buildings that are located in St. Louis Park. Due
to market conditions, Duke is requesting an extension for the filing of their applications for the
Final PUD plan and the Final Plat.
When the PUD was last extended, the City Council required the following:
"Duke shall cooperate with the Metropolitan Council Environment Services (MCES) in
the construction of the 1-GV-461 Reliever project. The Reliever project is required to
be constructed by MCES to increase sanitary sewer capacity to serve Duke's West
End development and other future development in certain parts of Golden Valley and
St. Louis Park. The cooperation may include the dedication of property easements for
the construction of a lift station, forcemain, air relief, or gravity lines as outlined in the
MCES plans for 1-GV-461. If the City or MCES determines that there has not been
adequate cooperation from Duke, the City retains the right to place additional
conditions on future extensions to the Preliminary PUD Plan for the Final PUD Plan."
At this time, staff recommends that the extension of the PUD approval be a conditional 180 �
days. Staff will monitor the efforts by MCES and Duke to reach a conclusion on the
permanent location of the lift station, the forcemain alignment, and all other appurtenances
needed for the construction of the 1-GV-461 force main within the vicinity of the Duke
property. All temporary and permanent easements shall be identified, and all land shall be
transferred in connection with the project.
Duke shall demonstrate to the City of Golden Valley its good faith efforts to act in accordance
with the requirements of the PUD. Staff will report the status of Duke's progress with the
MCES in 60 days. If adequate progress is being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the
Council may extend the PUD for an additional term not to exceed 120 days. If adequate
progress is not being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the Council may revoke any further
extension of the PUD preliminary approval beyond the first approximate 60 days.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Email from Duke Realty requesting an extension dated January 9, 2012 (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve an extension for submittal of the Final PUD Plan application and the Final
Plat for The Towers at West End, PUD No. 107 until August 20, 2012, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Duke shall submit cash deposits as requested by the City to cover legal and engineering
costs incurred by the City for consideration of the Preliminary Plan.
2. Duke will be financially responsible for road construction under TH 100 and intersection
improvements on the east side of TH 100 and traffic calming along the frontage road east
of TH 100, to occur at the time building permits are applied for by Duke.
3. Duke shall cooperate with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) in the
construction of the 1-GV-461 Reliever project. The Reliever project is required to be
constructed by MCES to increase sanitary sewer capacity to serve Duke's West End
development and other future development in certain parts of Golden Valley and St. Louis
Park. MCES and Duke to reach a conclusion on the permanent location of the lift station,
the force main alignment, and all other appurtenances needed for the construction of the
1-GV-461 force main within the vicinity of the Duke property. All temporary and permanent
easements shall be identified, and all land shall be transferred in connection with the
project. If the City or MCES determines that there has not been adequate cooperation
from Duke, the City retains the right to place additional conditions on future extensions to
the Preliminary PUD Plan or the Final PUD Plan.
4. Duke shall demonstrate to the City of Golden Valley its good faith efforts to act in
accordance with the requirements of the PUD. Staff will report the status of Duke's
progress with the MCES in 60 days. If adequate progress is being made to meet the
terms of the PUD, the Council may extend the PUD for an additional term not to exceed
120 days. If adequate progress is not being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the
Council may revoke any further extension of the PUD preliminary approval beyond the
first approximate 60 days. If Council finds that adequate progress is being made to meet
the terms of the PUD, the Council may permit the extension of the PUD preliminary
approval to continue for the remaining approximate 120 days.
I.-1 t I l � -.:r .. , , � � a17 � � � I�
12d Z1G
$10 CflLflNUlI_DR � 3�eIT -1— ' �jZ13 :D �9i 4316
�� ` 316 8I5 45AD �45I0 q� e� 309 � 4308
5221��,�$y;�l 5I11 St1�i �
'� , �`svs �oo �... _� o;�t►1 ado r �t�!tic�t��:
��7 �so '�s . vs; rvesT��rra t,r[ 3�
Oq
ar.o :�� � 517 ,52553s ,�xi ` �' ai� aos aos ��4srias�s� aao an� aoa . "�t� a�os
• 1 � � ., �.� `� 4 � , niia
' _ Tt7RAtPTtif,Rt? . 'Clj . � � 4�3 416 n� u�;417 a� ' � Sif B7S
\� � 7�, � SDi 451Q 5{l� �:�
�� 540 St16 SS� 5+� rk��' � � ,'S�� �4t8 `W„ 45�45�E!
Spp - ._. ...
6fiD t�
>. +�1�'6pg !�
,�;� eza �� 6oi �i � � ssg s�.s � su
�x+ �s � � as�� asuasa�. sit�
_ . �y �5 ` � � sof �
._ . . ` t� Gf4 � �4532 �
621639 t�fi29 825 < ; � � 642
S�� 517 6Il3 � �� � �_4T�0 4700 �� .�r � �
Cb{+7iti�1 A�td� � �� �� 4fi4Y''� �� "� 708
sszs ,Notth Tyro!Park �s.�
S3DD 5230 5220 5210 5�p ; LIRGLE DN� ;+l��bBrty Atl/id ,. ,
I ( Si20:51A8`5024 ,:" .. 453�
= 81y
_.,l� .I.��_._ Ab16 �� „- �.; � 402
CfRCLE 1)kS -. �'� ;� , ` �.
_.�,.�._.��....._...� �� "� 5�i4 � �.-' 4fi17 � �� 810
� �� „:
530i 5�315221�� 'SBdintell#BasfR ` '�� ' 815
.
I ,i �Y1��52Ui S32` �" �-. a � �. �g � �'- `824
�
51bi
��<�A5�10:4414: qq�,p�� `.'
� �631f SDii ,�i qq,
1 ,
� � � � �
, 4'S61 ��� ��. ����
nr►�a.�r�.,e : � .ss:� -: �
,7g � Nf laop Aovad asrs (,�,�( � �' ��
,_
� �` ... �85 �'�j.�. ';
M8}1WYi00 S 1"L�LNS i384 _ W8 I3S4 TtJ SB!{Wy30D S
SB HWY1�10 S T��'181394
�
L.J � �
_ _ '_.INTER&TATE 394 _
394 NDV LN ...,.
__ _ ..
_.,...
EB 339�i IA{�B HWYia�'� SB F1WY10U S TO EB L3+p4 I
"�'re,srnr��ga
" _ _ . wa►��a�cun
o _
City of St. Louis Park ' � ' ��-��� `
. � �.�► .,�:�4��0 �
�►
i �zs �
,% f � ' ,,�r�`' i�� �t, L__�
r' E. �Ci ` _,. �1 ,. �l. i345 4A50 T� L C �
RO.. Rs�"'^�
3075 gtt ��Q ' ; 1340 I•� �g43Z5� I i3Z3
'�,!` � � /} 1345 qq}� #3f5°. L....._
/ f , i ��4� lAiO 74Y5 �+ 140i
r� -'•,� ��, � 11fl5 � .
437t1
�• ,/ . C� , 142514Zt1 t4iS 14Z0 452fY'45fl0 433U 'f,�
Subject Properties ';��,,� �-� ��s ����,� ��� �,�" ���'�.�a �.�
�,; �',f �� xa�t � }� i,�u' �sss����..'"°° , ,�,°a2s Ye�23
f ,
� �g f45D : 1A45 �asa i� _ ��a �—
�,.• K �iaa's i .... � a�i
+ r;� �� ' 151i1 �ji5U5 15111 N;Y� 151A �� •ti417��`� #���iW0' .�
'/�,f� � �� 4 q� i515 1520 �15YS 15� �jI5i5 �� t524�� �'�� 431Z4#30�'�
". d510 '
,�, °�' � a Lszs s.s�l �SsY9 �� _ '�' ,
i i Vq. �, � "�15s�S 153t) . 453�(1 �� 4410 4$2f' ..
.� ... ... .. .
?'�f,.rf �-Q � w�`� iS3S 154fl �3545 l5pi1 . 2535 � _ . _bOUGUkS p}fE
/ � �? �`' isas .�w � is� a� � , .._i.... � as�sa�ts
,•' p : _ x�� - �S I�l asz�sa�!f�!�� L 1�
� .
i�u�,�w„�;��;�+s c�,-;y,:c+._a�;c�a-�'.� c s�:
Wittman, Lisa
From: Gary Gleason <Gary.Gleason@dukerealty.com>
Sent: Monday,January 09, 2012 10:13 AM
To: Wittman, Lisa
Cc: Grimes, Mark; Hogeboom,loe; Pat Mascia
Subject: RE:Towers at West End - PUD Extension
Attachments: image001.gif
Please consider this e-mail Duke Realty's request for a 6 month extension to submit the final PUD application for the
Towers at West End project.A$150 check will be sent to you in the mail.Thanks
Gary Gleason, PE
VP Consfiruction
1600 Utica Avenue South "
Suite 250
Minneapolis, MN 55416
952-543-2970 ( direct)
952-543-2975 ( fax )
�ary.�leason(�dukerealtv.com
From: Wittman, Lisa [mailto:LWittman@goldenvalleymn.gov]
Sent: Monday, )anuary 09, 2012 10:06 AM
To: Gary Gleason
Cc: Grimes, Mark; Hogeboom, Joe
Subject: Towers at West End - PUD Extension
Hello,
On August 16, 2011, the City Council approved an extension for you to submit your Final PUD application for the"Towers
at West End" project. We are approaching that deadline(February 26) and I would like to know if you are intending on
asking the Council for another 6-month extension. If you would like to ask the Council for an extension to submit your
Final PUD application please send me a letter or email requesting another extension and a check for$150 for the
extension fee by February 6, 2012 and I will make sure the request gets on the February 21 City Council agenda. If you
have any questions, please feel free to call me or Director of Planning and Development, Mark Grimes at 763-593-8095.
Thanks,
Lisa
lisa Wittman � Administrative Assistant � City of Golden Valley � `����`��� n����=
7800 Golden Valley Road (Golden Valley,MN 55427�763-593-8095 �763-593-8109(Fax) �763-593-3968(TTY)� s��-�������
Iwittman@aoldenvallevmn.sov ���:�-����
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended
1
�
�af:.: 6
� � 4 Public Works
. � o ���� � � a e
�
_. 763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. H. Cooperative Agreements between the City of Golden Valley and the Metropolitan
Council Environmental Services (MCES) for the Construction of the 1-GV-461 Reliever
Project
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Mitch Hoeft, EIT, Engineer
Summary
The City working with MCES to install an 18-inch sanitary sewer forcemain through the City
of Golden Valley to help address capacity concerns with the MCES system. A location map
showing the location of the forcemain construction is attached. The City and MCES have
negotiated two agreements that help to reimburse the City for its expenses in the project's
implementation and general oversight. A brief summary of each agreement can be found
below. The complete agreements are attached for further review.
The first agreement (Cooperative Agreement for the 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and
Forcemain Project) addresses Segment 1 of the project, which is being designed and
constructed by the MCES (see attached map). This agreement provides the City with
financial reimbursement for the assistance it is providing the MCES on the implementation of
this project, primarily in the areas of communication as well as design and construction
coordination. The City wiN use this money to pay salaries of current employees and to hire a
temporary full-time engineer to help manage the project on the City's behalf.
The second agreement (Amended and Restated Cooperative Agreement: 1-GV-461 Relief
Lift Station and Forcemain Project) amends the July agreement that provided for City design
of Segment 2 in conjunction with the 2012 Pavement Management Program. This
amendment addresses construction cost sharing and construction services.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Cooperative Agreement: 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain Project (Segment 1)
(40 pages)
Amended and Restated Cooperative Agreement: 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain
Project (Segment 2) (36 pages)
Recommended Action .
1. Motion to authorize Cooperative Agreement: 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and
Forcemain Project (Segment 1).
2. Motion to authorize Amended and Restated Cooperative Agreement: 1-GV-461 Relief
Lift Station and Forcemain Project (Segment 2).
-2� ��.... sea► .�r r .. �i j . . • _ .._ .� . . Y�b� - �
:..".,,i�',a.�__--�-�:..�.�-x. .. . t '�� ��.1` . ' ;a .. ,°x „ �� , . . � .; aeoo_:
.�.... __""'-.-�"_ -- . ��:`� � __ r. +ni � :� - . ., .. .
��'--�..._ +�fl �, �- '°°°g T�
.
� ,
. ._ . �-.. � . _ . .
,_ ��. ....,...... ,,. 1 .Y ''. ,._�t�
. --� � _ - •- .w�.
.._.. ..,_._ . ..._.. .,._� ._— __�.,�.- .
.. - _..- :�-- '__.—
Cs sm. '' , - . ��-- ._. .
� e'.� �A :at ll' . . �� �. • ,.._ � . . . . ..
515 u � � A 5 �`�.�s_ . , . 6 � '�'e� d'�3'�ed�n�t' �. � J� 4 ui '"n` .. ,t� �M1'.¢ �� uo
61t5 6� �� J9D �:, � �� I S��c.' �.�5� .M �j � � _�Slbl P �i•�° & :"� . .. � � � :_�
515
45 � !a •at , - � j;a , w!��' ,:� ti �dr ,p . T"� � +sro. � 'K-,. ' .:�s�. asc�. .,���o
, ��- . •
�n . - �,s k
, C +{ w y - @ n* +tn�y .£s' ' ��. � y� �,. - , .. � � � . � _�.;� ,. ,*
t . . :� 8 ,�tt^�'� ,�. � yp . z';�. '°n � .e�* e.n9;�Y
T � ��� , ��3� �� ' p �'„ , .. . .. 1 ,
. �
-'L y � h.��p 51 � r R ��rA � � 01�� � � � �T ?�'� ... ��
, q a .
.ti�..�.....' k � .. .h �' A . +01 ��N{� yb �' ��� 4A�Ow ...e � .,q;� • ,5.
, �'y� �J ' `115 � � 'M9 � � �'{�
+, .
�
.� � , �'
�. �..,�e a e k .Y � $ � .f61 ��., � � 5 )1_ . � . ::. .... .. k ... �c��
� '
° , , , . � . ,�p tnoewra k1�
, .zq ' �S'�f'�"P..r,d'a&p .� ,..� , . � .� ' . ' 1.� ' '�#` il . �ie
�re . � e .6�' .-� � * d..�y�+ '.
. �u°° �'., zet � §� � �. ' :'� � .�.�!:� ' ��oii � ... . '''�,��. °: . . � � � .. � �3�,�
_ � � s�6 �'� w� aa ,�
x
' � sis � # � R S�`�:5 �' ., � �� `� .. . ., . ,a+o
�-*� .' , . .`»` , ., ,, ' ' �- ' °, � �` , ,'�� --. ,. . ,. _ x-s�:. ,,5m mr -w.. '3o�'
y, .r'
�}" �
p»+. ., �1•. T5 .G 'a` �', .ry� $ �9�7C0 •.�� .. � - •§� � I.
4Cd � ,� `� � ` � � �J ,.i '� r/:
a
r � � . � , ti�. 'Ea+�� � � a3 r���za .
+� 2•
�� 9 �
{ , d � tse • �� � �o�' " �,1 i�a� a�� .��x, mc
" `i ,���� � . " ' - �� 'Gx� � , � ,s�
r�.� q t �::, ` ��� t� �� ��_ 'me � , �
�- � �: ti ` �a°" q'°- ��
�N , ,- �,�
� 'F�'� dtd,� ..., . � g , x ! � , � D �=� t]5}•
� t"
� � �� Section 1 B _ �'� �: =',�� "' � t3� � ;,z � �
, � & .����
� . , -� _ . . �x ,� �.
91,. .�:, '�y'1 I .1W6', xg ^x' si.'��,.: � . _i1�.
�
' �� � " . . ,.� :. . „}�'E , . ��.
� , ..... � . � �� ..... ��. . �'� . .. j , .. js . ' • '
v � � �
��B4 W .� M5� SeiO ' !in f � �. 3P5- � �. � ,
� - . _ . _ .. _ . . _ r'a.,risa�v .`--�,y r` � c�r..wv � . m ._ ..r �' S�, ,'^S; iw..
. . ', . ,:
,A ,r� iw � ns � .. ;atat. � ��:�i°°' #S�eO . 75- • ,a . �., . �
t.�)c. � iyl '�a - ,- � - ..h ' •+� , 5 �s '�N 6 ��p`.. �.
.... � �� . , �T �'S�f7 -._.__.�..ti . . , ta]��-a:6J -�6]n._:SS ��*" .i-,
l� " ¢ . ` . � , '
.
. � �1!� '�y ` �� � "_- n t� '�a.�.R . ., r . " . . .. _ - •
..16I" .°-2�G •'7fl. � � °,. � - 3 S 1 '�a y�' M� �R�� . 190. 1 y�iT '. '.� �B . �' 1 't3 � �S
� i � � ,'
� �.. �^` "�� . • � !�f . �� .� , � �` �rUC s02 ' -.1Lr ..- •�
ro� a � . - ,m • ia
� ,f� .,�. ,� .. wu �i_ . 'as t , .` +w in ja � . +w - �
�,;�� _ � . [�-- �Q N; ro i r. 6�w � , n' � � �.
Jf}�'O'i§T j}'3 � �� {{iVv . ^�� � � 2;1 SM • t•,i ' " . �f11 x9 �� ".'
4.� .,� iC `x` � ' [. �°" •..� � •� . - . 90! : iM , �SC'
Y
� � � + � �' i , .3; z�. .�m ro _ II 4 � y,,� ���oa ' '�'_ �- . ,..
. �"'+t g a!&; ,, �.`"_ .� . . x.i . . . w: � - .�i39.� 'm:
r� ��9 .
� 90 � � . . � 90y • ��'
�'d ,3,� . q.�; .,. . $•,. v, . ..; � . - � .� _� � �,� r��_ � f� sR OP �o �.
�' °4 .x i � . . . � MC .. �",;:.� t .�•.a:: fM boat . l6:0 : 3t5 f : . .
��`47i'ix C'3L'� F.. 18q _ � • S11! ��xJ:� ' �_ � .- . � � ", -' • ..
:101
�. . �3 10! � �^ EZ � bD' �3:5 � �pn ' +OB� - .� � a�p �
- -�� d '� . Y..N � s
. , a. ..+. �.l .�� ... . -. , . .
... � . . .�. - � , � �
. t., a
. �-
i .Rr.�. ., , ,. . � �1 � ' . � � . . 311 . . 97i �19_ ' .. ����..
�' ." '. �'- " ' ':. '!Gt Km Gt0�5uB
w . � ...<..:.... . ,a . . 3.�. . a� . . � � . . .
� fOL�'9tl1 /1N y�� W�� � ���.�G Sp!.
8� a.,. 2 jy i . ' , � . . � -St! a5:0 •,SI
` . �{ � ` � � HB U^ B:a tf6 . 9p1 ' N 5r6- '
,� 7 � e � -N3 a5:1 ♦
�w...m� . ,..t . �. 8� , � !i I .. ., . . �GE . Y1S ' '/A' �' H'+•
�.. . ` ...7r� c(r, �2�� e i � � 4 t� ' . ' ' L�96 Att�s ��8+0
wea eceo: aoo ��� � !�� � -a2, °:' e�, e�.� 0p° �ijyl �p . ..xsi
��. �� a.' , Section 2 , �„ ;
�z�;�_.. . �... � M� "�' �'�,° �`o � - . . .. „ & . '�t�s ' .e2�
.
x � . : : � �� � �
_ ,� � �eaw "" ..
xn z
..�„r 5 ,; � q � . . .� 1�, C Ct � ��k�. .�.kw�
�:, .1 . ;'�7i� S'�. . .. . . k^.� . � 95..^0
a. ay .
, x x � . . ,, _ �
�
� . ' 'd�� ei}'Y' .
lWU;� .. i . ._. .:, . �., .., . � •. . . . '' .
.f �p
._.X_`,.:qn s � a � �..���:� .y°eeaovYw,.a•.bwn ��.n� . � .. .. ^ �s` �
..,
�,. �-_
_.._� � • •� ..::.� , . .,,. ^ m �.
_ . .. . . . ._. " � ... � . .. . ' � �"'+,..w.�„�._
ri
, .
. .___`.�..`z:�:.,,�.�,�, �y�n;="' . .. � � �
��, -� ����� � � � Section 1 A � �-���
�=f, � . � �� � ���- .� � .W �- `�s� �� .�:
•� �=#' � � /j N� � .;�� �1 , ,�:
: . .
, / ,
k l ,�� �"�.:� .t� f'� 1Y 11�5 .
,�p�.a��. � t �e.�, � �'+t.,. . , . � � � �1�1 � I5�1 i �.:':�. , ,.� is�s uo -�� «ee�
•iOC,
� �� � � � ��I ' � � �� r. � . as�'�ii�. � �ai� ��'� �s°j���R ,�'
>
r�� - - �. . • � . _, . - Iix �
, . . .. i � ... � � 1�35 Il3p �'{.1� _ w� !�,
fs:{' � ��� '
tm .- 4su .aSG �•'
imo
7 . � IMS� � �' �.
+t ., . � ., . �SO � 15M IMO� yA� tS�O � �T .'
// a". 1505 . �y
� �° f i. ��1♦ . � �' � .� � ' : C'7 ' � �� i5i5 .�6.'0 15L 1S•u l5�!�. tS10 ' \29 q £ 9�, s
k�C f _i j _ ' ,y'� t5� i . a $ 7�i
+�_ �i � 4 , . � . - � 149'] � 1517 15Y
.. 1 a Y ti4 /
rY t ' ' F
♦ 'tlf e R'��r (�.. r ' .�� . �� - : ' � '. �f 1S4'� • iLi 1"r10 15SS"�lOO •. '.4 . .
f�+ .
♦
�,,.��n _r' _ , , � � �-- � � I .� iK� �sm �rsw iss: a�o ' .f A =,5�N
�y i.i: `. .. � " . , t . ; � . ' � _ __ ��355 � �
r
`3F� . . � �6-.� ♦
_f�� , - .
: . _ °- ' - _. ..
.� «� �-. � ,: �
1-GV-461 _ �.E, ,,,,o , e
Sanitary Sewer Reliever Corridor ������ ����� ����
SEGMENT 1
CODPERATIVE AGREEMENT
1 -GV-461 Relief Lift Station and
Forcemain Project
This is the agreement that covers the MCES portion of the work (non-Circle
Down). Under this agreement Golden Valley will:
• Assist MCES in land acquisition, permitting, input and assistance during
the design phase, communication, and construction inspection (R.O.W.).
• Be reimbursed from MCES for up to $360,000 in employee hourly
expenses on a pass-through basis.
• Use this funding to hire a temporary Project Engineer for finro years.
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain Project
THIS LAND ACQUISITION, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of , 20_, by
and between the City of Golden Valley("City") and the Metropolitan Council ("Council"), both
public corporations and political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota.
BACKGROUND RECITALS
1. The Council, as part of its metropolitan wastewater treatment facilities, proposes
to design and construct a lift station and forcemain (1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and
Forcemain) through the City to increase capacity and improve redundancy and reliability of its
facilities in the Golden Valley and St. Louis Park service areas. For the purposes of this
Agreement the 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain project shall be hereinafter referred
to as the "Project."
2. A segment of the Project, consisting of 1,800 feet of forcemain installed on Circle
Down, will be installed by the City under Council Agreement #11I031. The forcemain segment
to be installed on Circle Down by the City, and the potential lift station location and forcemain
route for the remainder of the Project are shown on E�ibit A.
3. The Project will pass through a well developed section of the City affecting many
residents, businesses, and agencies other than the Council. City staff has existing and well
developed relationships and communications channels with these residents,businesses, and other
agencies. Several Project tasks involve interactions with residents and businesses, such as access
to private property, easement acquisition, public information and involvement, street restoration
and traffic control planning. The Council has determined that the Council could best utilize its
staff and financial resources by seeking City staff support and coordination for these tasks,
design and construction tasks, and execution of other tasks.
4. The Council has contracted with Foth Infrastructure and Environment, LLC
("Consultant") to perform engineering and construction consulting services for the Project. The
Consultant's Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines for the contract between the
Council and the Consultant is attached as Exhibit B. The Proposed Project Schedule is attached
as Exhibit C.
5. The Council is authorized by Minnesota Statutes 473.504 to construct interceptor
or treatment works determined to be necessary or convenient for the collection and disposal of
sewage in the metropolitan area and, under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 471.59
(providing for joint or cooperative action between governmental units including the Council and
City), contract with any governmental unit for the performance on the Council's behalf of any
service the governmental unit is authorized to provide for itself.
6. The Project is duly authorized by the Council and is included in the Council's
2012 Capital Improvement Plan.
7. The Council and City agree that each is authorized to enter into this Agreement
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 471.59, that the Project may be carried out by the parties hereto
as provided by this Ageement.
2
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which has
been agreed to by the parties, the Council and the City agree as follows:
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions under which the
Council and City will support and execute certain tasks related to the Project and under which
the Council and City will reimburse each other for costs associated with these tasks.
II.ADDITIONAL STREET WORK
Traffic capacity improvements are planned by the City at the intersection of Xenia
Avenue and Golden Hills Drive and the intersection of Wayzata Blvd. and Quentin Ave. The
Council project may disturb significant portions of these intersections. The City has requested
that the Council construct street improvements at these intersections as part of the Project
("Additional Street Work"). This Additional Street Work is not required to install the Project.
The Council's Contractor will construct these improvements. Cost sharing of this work will be
determined based on project related impacts and will be determined and amended to this
Agreement as the final design and project impacts become more available.
The Council will advertise for and receive construction bids for the Project, including
Additional Street Work, and will recommend award of the construction contract in accordance
with Council procedures. The City will review the bids with respect to the Additional Street
Work and advise the Council in writing within three business days if it does not want the Council
to include this work in the Council's award of the construction contract for the Project. If the
City advises the Council to exclude the Additional Street Work from the Council's award of the
construction contract, all references to Additional Street Work included in this Agreement shall
become null and void and the Additional Street Work will not be conshucted. The Party to
whom the Project Construction Contract is awarded is hereby referred to as the "Contractor."
III. CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT
In accordance with terms of this Agreement, the Council hereby consents to and appoints
the City as its agent to support the Consultant and to execute specific Land Acquisition, Design
3
Phase, and Construction Phase tasks that will be determined and amended to this Agreement as
the design is completed and project impacts become more available.
IV. LAND ACQUISITION,DESIGN,AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE TASKS
1. The Consultant and Council responsibilities for the Land Acquisition, Design
Process, and Construction are defined in the Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines of
the contract between the Council and Consultant attached in Exhibit B.
2. The Council sha11 provide the City notice of, and the Council and City shall
participate in, progress meetings with the Consultant to confirm that the Consultant is proceeding
in accordance with the Consultant Contract and the Council's reasonable requirements.
3. The contract between the Council and the Consultant for design of the Project,
and all agreements, covenants, obligations, warranties, guarantees, and indemnifications of the
Consultant shall be for the benefit of, and may be enforced by, the Council. The Council shall
pursue claims for defective design, if any, directly against the Consultant. The City shall
cooperate in the prosecution of any claim by the Council against the Consultant, but the City
shall in no event be responsible for design defects arising from the Council Construction
Documents or construction defects arising from performance of the work designed by the
Consultant.
V. COST AND PAYMENT
1. The Council's construction contract will include separate line items in the bid
form to complete Additional Street Work for the City. Associated costs will be determined by
the City and amended to the Agreement by the Council at a later date once project impacts are
clearly defined.
2. The Council shall reimburse the City for land acquisition, input and assistance
during the design phase, and construction tasks at the City-staff hourly and fringe benefit rates
and for mileage, equipment,printing, copying, and postage rates defined in Exhibit D. City costs
for providing the Construction Inspector will be reimbursed by Council on a pass-through basis.
3. City reimbursements by the Council will be capped at a maximum of$360,000.
4. The Council will reimburse the City in the amounts provided in this Agreement
monthly, within twenty-one days of receipt of invoices submitted by the City based on the
4
progress of the Project and approval of the invoices by the Council unless the Council contest the
invoice by written notice within fourteen calendar days of receipt of the invoice. If the Council
provides timely notice of contest, the Council shall pay all uncontested amounts and may
withhold the contested amount pending resolution of the amount actually due.
5. The amount due stated in the final invoice shall be final, binding and conclusive,
and the amount shall be immediately payable, upon expiration of the aforesaid thirty calendar
day examination period unless the Council provides timely notice of contest. If the Council
provides timely notice of contest of the final invoice, the Council shall pay all uncontested
amounts and may withhold the contested amount pending resolution of the amount actually due.
6. If the Council determines the need to amend the contract with the Consultant and
the amendment results in increased cost to the City to fulfill its tasks as defined in the
Agreement,the Council hereby agrees to adjust the City's costs accordingly.
7. The City will reimburse the Council under the same conditions described in Items
V., 3,4 and 5, above.
VI. RIGI3TS OF ENTRY AND PERMITS
1. For purposes of performing its duties or obligations or exercising its rights under
this Agreement, the City (including its employees, consultants and contractors) may enter upon
the property or property interests owned by the Council.
2. For the purposes of performing its duties or obligations or exercising its rights
under this Agreement, the Council (including its employees, consultants and contractors) may
enter upon the property or property interests owned or provided by the City.
3. The City and Council shall assist the Consultant in applying for and obtaining
construction permits and encroachment permits required for construction of the Council Project.
VII. PROGRESS MEETINGS
The Council shall conduct and the City shall attend regularly scheduled progress
meetings and provide input. Meeting minutes will constitute progress reports.
5
VIII. RECORDS AND DATA
1. All records kept by the Council and the City with respect to the Project shall be
subject to examination by the representative of each party hereto.
2. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose
by the activities of the City and the Council pursuant to this Agreement shall be governed by
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as amended, and the Minnesota Rules implementing such Act
now in force or hereinafter adopted.
3. City shall receive copies of all record drawings prepared by the Council's
engineer. The Council will provide the City with digital and paper copies of these record
drawings. Digital forms are to be turned over as Auto CAD and PDF files.
IX. EMPLOYEES
All employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance
of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be
considered employees of the Council; and any and all claims that may or might arise under the
Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota
on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties
as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged, on any
of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the obligation or
responsibility of the Council.
All employees of the Council and all other persons engaged by the Council in the
performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the
Council shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that may or might
arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the
State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made
by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while
so engaged, on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the
obligation or responsibility of the City.
6
X. RESPONSIBILITY AND INDEMNITY
1. Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof
to the extent authorized by the law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and
the results thereof. The Council's maximum monetary liability is governed by the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. The City's maa�imum monetary liability is governed by the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.
2. The City and the Council each warrant that they are able to comply with the
aforementioned liability requirements through a self insurance program and have minimum
coverage consistent with the liability limits contained in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.
XL ENTIRE AGREEMENT
1. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between parties is contained
herein and that this Ageement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the
parties relating to the subject matter herof. All items referred to in this Agreement including the
Recitals are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement.
2. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this
Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this
Agreement signed by the parties hereto.
XII. INCORPORATION OF APPLICABLE LAW
Applicable provisions of Minnesota State law, federal law and of any applicable local
ordinances shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
Specifically, the City agees to comply with all federal, state and local laws and ordinances
applicable to the City relating to nondiscrimination, affirmative action, public purchases,
contracting employment, including worker's compensation and surety deposits required for
construction contracts.
7
XIII. SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. If any part of this
Agreement is rendered void, invalid or unenforceable, such rendering shall not affect the validity
and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement unless the part of parts which are void,
invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire Agreement
with respect to the parties. One or more waivers by said party of any provision, term, condition
or covenant shall not be construed by the other parties as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the
same by other parties.
XIV. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
The covenant of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto,their successors and assigns.
XV. GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement is entered into in and under the laws of the State of Minnesota and shall
be interpreted in accordance therewith.
XVI. NOTICES
Any notice of demand, which may or must be given or made by a party hereto, under the
terms of this Agreement or any statute or ordinance, shall be in writing and shall be sent certified
mail or delivered in person to the other party addressed as follows:
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
William Moore, General Manager
390 Robert St. North
St. Paul, MN 55101
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
8
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By: By:
Patrick Born
Its: Its: Regional Administrator
By: Approved as to Form:
Its:
Office of General Counsel
9
EXHIBIT LIST
Exhibit A Project Location
Exhibit B Council Consultant Project Delivery Guidelines
Exhibit C Proposed Project Schedule
Exhibit D Estimated Costs of City Services to Council
Exhibit A
Project Location
. ' � a � , _. . . 1 , �� � a�5 � ��.'t�1i�ra\ �� lr ,.' ys
�"i' ..� A �s"` j`++;`' ���� a�� � �• .4' ,. . . .��hld �s�_'�s;`+�� ,i II�: �AF�� � i.�.
.� � � ...s �3 � '►,.. �Y �� �j� P;' � t_�► ` �h+� S
n4"'�.. .. - i P £ § } �� �?� k � � �i' �!:
_ . . �sJ s.4. ,�C�� . . I r� �� ,K'f ,�� _�..� '# :�7'�,� �_ �.�;�'��'t
_-.. _—�.,�JJ �� I -._"�,'. _ ... � . . sr�• r —
-..r' .�`"�`" ), -fs�► '�;�� �
e�. ,I�s�t�►+r, .:r � �_ Y � R _ - "' �+" �.",�+
e M� '� "t'` '� �`� � � 1�- �
� ' �� r; - .-t; ,i�"`� .� � _ -4'-� 4'�-`�s�+t� - `
# ' .�;, � � �� >. � � .J� ,�~ ,� �
. '
. _.
. . `..
.'- ' � , . �,� t ,., ��
:
w C .� ,��
•� �..� � ��p� . . { 'i+�� t.� � ��; -
� r � {d .� y
t :} �` � `-#.�.�^� *3".f i ' s � ��'�:'��1�'� '�,} ,,.. �, ,� , � �',��'!T
� �� �.♦ �'ti.. q� y� �S . � �,w ;. �� • '•+�,���„'�;•l��•,+�., .S"
.+ -� �_' , .�! f -•* } ��
.�; �. �� ��� �' a,. -�' ��� ,:a.f-' -."� � t ��� ���t� � �
t�' ..: 'a. � ' `� . � �� ? � � ' ' ; � �i~ � �T
,� , � U .y y.. � ,� 'tiv� '�,d.►E',��„ � � ' S r� '� � .���!i�1.bi y''� '�
. � ��"�„��,� 1 �c�e�e'a"� � 4` �"` ,t�q�,�� � + ��� ��
�' *'. ��` � :�R _ 4�.� +� ► r, k' .�' y� st'.\. - I
s �� ii.T . .���� �: �
�4� ��""'�;,�. y.����Y� .' k a,. .:�•,',!� A ��'„�t� _x,� - ��� �, ,�
!� �a'� � r .� ��`� �'+�,T ,. ��'1 �,f�'�.�$ . �� �►` .��1
�,"�. j, � � �'► _�� �°? ,� ,� '` r •�;
a `'�• � p '",r..,., �;1"�}r 4,' � �� " �p e "`� �;.. .�,� '�� �
,
. .� }��� ' , , � �r r
♦� ^ '.
. S' � i `�
�����4 Y�w� � � � � � j,� � .,.�, '��� ,�� �#��' � � '� �
!"�!hf,���'!'�,�F�W,�.y ��.`� �i� �.�-� '��+ R' , „�. '��• �►�« r
,yI . ,.
i 'M'�P'T F'�'e �r���`�� ��MM'�"'°iiM� y�� , �y� .r' r4, �,y`�, e� �' . ���� � � .
� f��.'�;�t.�r��`r�; �_�.�� � ��•,� �♦'�r ,y��{'.�.� .,�... :E 1; ';_� *,�. ��,� :`±�'r,'
� ' ,a
+°°�� ,���'� �'� ' �� ��` .� Proposed ' �, _ w�`� �r+ ��i '�
�.. � .
. r . .
�,`> .4 4�. �'� $�� � , �r� �t�� �t#�
_ ry ,
, . J�! w
. � � x•'. '� +r E"` ''w+. .. y.�. �i�t�t�+�i�,�.la. �,-
. ,
, .
1 Force Mam �,,.� '�
� ,. . . , . .
�_:: � a
. . , . . , - P, '� .
,
,>s;
� �� ;` r.:. � � ' . 1,�,;;3, �� �.y� .��s -�.. +N�" : . �.s , `L.
`�'y, ��, �,_,�` �. ?� �� -�F,Yy.,i��. � =a L `y � ,�, -x'! � ` j���1 � ��
�..� ; � ,
� , .
, 44 ..
� � }� : � ,.{�' �, 4 �,�, � '� _� ,,. .R r #.
� �,. t _ � �.' �• "�`�'�,,,�,, r r t� �
� :�; � ,.����`�� •� ; � ����� �.��h��,�� t i,ir�t� ,�#� .��� r�
+ L,i�.�i�`�t �;�, L.��,�; _c ..,.�t� �,,,�a�,,��4� '' �
�.:.,� ' ��i+a ,,'�,� `` '� �. ,:
� �
_�� `� - - '�
. �1 ,:
, . ,
- - � "�`�'�`a+'� r �;
�
�_�z .
:
.. - --
� - -
' ' ��R"!
�.r.�.ji..�y�:���y ' } .. .� te....���!!r �"��. '���, !r._ , y':.'� ' �
� • . y� [ � ��
- .
.
. � � _. � ' : � � � .,; ���,! Circle Down Project
� .
E � . �' - - -
. ,
. . � . e
, . . . '
. . r :
�
.
, - i,,.r��, � .
, ,,.. .. � ,..t� �'`�► y,�
j �� � _ _
�
. .. . , � . �: ^K� � � _� ! , , _ + � T ,. i - y�" i _�a , �I
�;�r'M►ta+aty�[,� �S11V4! + � - � . � .. .. � � .'� .
t _ � ,..�. ,....,. ..b .'S'�-�.. f.rf �� r �*.
� € _ . �� �,,, f, ., , t. �� �� �
3 .: � � ` � , ,! , ��_ yw
, ,
,.
..
� .
�' ' ikr� � -.;t � ��►�h:a - .. � �� i � �M
� � �'� �'� 4' 6 � .i� '�!r�,�r..... r. „� r_ '.� r . �.
� � A � �.� ,R's`` � a t r''' t,�� "Ga^ S�
+ .� R` � 44
_.��� �.'�{; � .�c_„- ��' ���,. � -� � � �
.
=`-.:s:-, -.• �� • '��;:�"�� . �� '�*t� � � +�
. , .
_ , - rt�w �- �
_ _ _ .< _ , .
.
� __ _ . �v..x �r �
" .' . , - . .i�...�. � - _ ' � `''—�_� �
k�,A �� d �o `4'� � ,`,y 't ;: '�� � . �R�M ' '"5�4�`�z•i 'x�� - .x.�
��' �'" � d • t, '.� '-y��
� : r.� . , -� g
1�_. . � �s ; 'C� �. !#Y r I� .��; r f .+k4'i�, +�'•.'.
r � . .y�,,
Sf r O�\�� ��''s� �1�,. 1 ��q .. � .i "� �''�� � -,`.,.`«yr »� j
��r t �i �. ,�� �,�` � i�;,y., � _ .,� .7�4.''� d�•;?';r'+�`' r* u
r :,,c,�,�,�� F_. , .� ;�,� . ��.. ,F,�. .
+ r �� � � � •�s a^#� �+it, r' � . �( .m`�.;. r}`�'; T �.�sc�x r.w
�� "`'•� ' i
��� � ir s '' F �C.. . � a�` �:. !� � � *� `�� ,
� � �i ��r*�!,s'" . - _ +.,W�,»�u � J/ � �*�; � K �.: .-
�t� , �ry, � • �s� ���t �/ .� � > r> s
.`�,' � y+r'# ��"�f"'f a'4 1 _ , �S I ,J` *�� '�+�P � � +_}.�'�'�� ` � �
3 �, � � �# � y
�J � ' ; •.��` � � �-.�, � �t ��. r ��jr 1 . �; ♦ +n�}� • . ,�� r �A
'. `e� ,i: � 1. J I t- !"•�: y t� +�t'+� ,,,.t► �i
i
t i�R„ tl� .+> E� � '�'�► h'. :� '1� t- 'r�'.�!����€���_�: �
'i .k�lf-tr�!��. -_: �+"���- '� ,`'4�a� . I ��� : � �L; �� :! •�� w� �-#'°'"-�yrt'ti. .—'►'"""'" ,�►
� �� � , ,j
M�� A " -1 � � L � f.:..������ A .�.�
� �
.r � . ` c. � � i _ * Rri.�t �:_k � w�":
� 5� � � .. ;}Y '� `, r _n ��� ��� ,n,. r-- ` 7k . .�i
��� � �.�.�,�` t�+y.�., S ��� _ F,+� ^i` � - � �?'!�» .,.a';rt"_L,��>���:1..�
� �.��fi.r'��" fi: '_� 4 ,i�°! •�J+�r � J. { e, �y�j'.� �f , s��1�� « �.�w. ` .4� �i �`�
�'�� � l�•�,'y��► t ` i �r„�. - !rC y'- j� `''' ,� � � , � 1-
'a �''•'�' � .�.� ��?`'t.'�'�' "' a � a • r �f.�� ��f�''�?�� ��. !�� �J �� x;� �
Ir;x°I� +^�I � (��P� �
FIGURE 1
Exhibit A o 500 �,000
= Proposed 18" Force Main Feet
St Louis Park/Golden Valley Circle Down Project /�
1-GV 461 �•i
Q Municipal Boundaries �
MHRGSPN4SbatalCAD1825840,�GIS1GotlenVale acPlanlEAlMFi v�s1F'ure 2 Pro'ect ocatim Ci 2009 12 18mxd
Exhibit B
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
On
General, Project Administration, Preliminary Design
(Facility Planning), Land Acquisition, Design Phase,
Construction Phase
TABLE OF CONTENTS
0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2
1 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 2
Task 1.1 Project Administration 2
Task 1.2 QA/QC 4
2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE 5
Task 2.1 Preliminary Design Workshop 5
Task 2.2 Preliminary Data Review 5
Task 2.3 Development of Project Alternatives 6
Task 2.4 Public Involvement 7
Task 2.5 Facility Inspection and Condition Evaluation 7
Task 2.6 Wetland and Floodplain Review 8
Task 2.7 Evaluation of Project Alternatives 8
Task 2.8 Technical Review 8
Task 2.9 Recommendations and Implementation 9
3 DESIGN PHASE 9
Task 3.1 Public Involvement 9
Task 3.2 Survey and Mapping 10
Task 3.3 Utility Locations and Mapping 10
Task 3.4 Wetland Delineation and Mapping 11
Task 3.5 Geotechnical Review and Base Line Report 11
Task 3.6 Environmental Site Contingency and Site Safety and Health Plans 12
Task 3.7 Mid Course Design 13
Task 3.8 Technical Review Panel-Mid Course Design 14
Task 3.9 Final Design 14
Task 3.10 Technical Review Panel-Fina1 Design 15
Task 3.11 Bid Ready Contract Manual and Drawings 15
Task 3.12 Support of Securing Permits and Regulatory Approvals 16
Task 3.13 Consultant's Estimate of Construction Cost 17
Task 3.14 Bid Phase Support 17
5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 18
Task 4.1 Utility Meetings 18
Task 4.2 Weekly Progress Meetings And Site Visits 18
Task 4.3 Review of Contractor's Submittals 18
Task 4.4 Construction Inspection Services 19
Task 4.5 Construction Surveying 19
Task 4.6 Review of Field Orders and Change Orders 19
Task 4.7 Draft Facility Manual 19
Task 4.8 Final Facility Manual 20
Task 4.9 Operator Manual 20
Task 4.10 Interactive Facility Manual 21
Task 4.11 As-Recorded Contract Drawings 21
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 1
0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
In addition to the quantities and formats of deliverables provided in the Scope of Work for each
task, a copy of all final memorandum, reports,plans, and other submittals will be delivered to the
Council's Project Manager on CD-ROM. Text, figures, and tables will be in WORD, EXCEL,
JPG, DWG or other Council format.
All drawing files, maps, or record drawings created by the Consultant shall conform to the
Council's standards and procedures. The standards and procedures are specified within the
Council's documents "General Requirements for Preparation of Bidding Documents/Record
Drawings" and"MCES CAD Drawing Standards, Policies, and Procedures".
Incomplete documents provided to Council will not be accepted as draft. Documents provided to
Council intended as final deliverables will not be accepted if Council or regulatory comments are
not addressed in a satisfactory manner. Documents provided to Council which do not meet the
completeness as determined by the review level content defined in the Quality Assurance
Review Plan will not be accepted. These deliverables will be returned without a change in status
or review level. Additional document submittals are at the expense of the Consultant and do not
constitute a basis for change in the project schedule.
1 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
TASK 1.1 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Objective: Provide ongoing management, administration, and coordination of the project,
keeping Council fully informed of the project status for the entire length of the Contract.
Description: This task will be ongoing. The Consultant's Project Manager will be responsible
overall for this effort.
The Consultant's Project Manager will promote open and frequent communication to keep the
Council fully participating in and informed of the work progress, major issues, and potential
problems and their resolutions. This communication is not only essential to successfully
completing each project but will help ensure the best available data and expertise is employed.
In addition, the Consultant's Project Manager will be responsible for internal performance of the
project team. The Consultant's Project Manager will help ensure proper staffing, completion of
tasks on schedule and within budget, and implementation of quality control and technical review
procedures.
Project Status Meetin�s
The Consultant's Project Manager and appropriate project team members will attend project
status meetings every two weeks to discuss timely issues and milestones, and to review project
status. The Consultant's Project Manager, in consultation with Council's Project Manager, will
prepare an agenda for each meeting.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 2
The Council's Project Manager will identify the Council personnel to be present at each meeting
based on the proposed meeting agenda. Minutes of the rneetings will be prepared and submitted
to Council.
Project Schedule
At the onset of the project, a detailed project schedule will be developed showing all major tasks
and subtasks and estimated submittal dates. The Initial Project Schedule shall be submitted with
the Quality Assurance Review Plan (QARP) but prior to initiating the first meeting. The Project
Schedule will be updated during the biweekly project status meetings. The Project Schedule will
show target start and finish dates, start and finish constrictions, critical paths, and percent
completed by task.
Project Administration
Project administration is a function that will occur throughout the project. This work element
includes:
• Monthly progress reports
• Monthly submittals for progress payments
• Records management
• Project initiation tasks
• Control of project budget and schedule
These work items are described below.
Monthly progress reports will be submitted to the Council. Each report will include, at a
minimum, the following information:
• A narrative description of work completed during the preceding month
• A discussion of any key issues and the parties responsible to address them
• A forecast of major work elements to be undertaken in the coming month
• A timetable for input of decisions required from Council
• A billing and payment status
• A earnings versus earned value statement for each task
Monthly submittals for progress payments will be prepared and submitted to the Council in the
format required. The submittals will include a "Payment Claim for Engineering Services" form,
a list of all employees charging to the projects with complete billing detail, and an MBE/WBE
progress report form. The monthly progress report discussed above will be submitted in
conjunction with the monthly submittal for progress payments.
Project records will be maintained in a neat, organized fashion, in accordance with any
requirements in the agreement with the Council. As indicated in other sections of this Scope of
Work, project meeting minutes will be recorded and submitted to Council. Project
correspondence and calculations will be submitted to Council as required or requested.
The initiation of the project will require certain administrative tasks. These items include
opening internal job accounts for tracking project costs, preparing an internal project
memorandum, setting direction for the work, and preparing agreements with subcontractors.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 3
Control of project budget and schedule will be achieved through monthly reviews of labor and
other direct cost expenditures, periodic schedule updates, monthly progress report preparation,
and periodic cost-to-complete projections. An earnings versus earned value statement for each
task will be provide with each payment request
Deliverable: Copies of project status meeting minutes, initial project schedule, and periodic
updates, monthly progress reports, monthly submittals for progress payments, and project
correspondence and calculations if so requested.
TASK 1.2 QA/QC
Objective: Conduct internal QA/QC peer reviews during the project. Provide efficient means
for Council's quality assurance reviews during design during the entire length of the project.
Description: Consultant shall submit a written QA review plan (QARP) with the Project
Schedule and prior to the first meeting. The QARP and Project Schedule are considered part of
the Contract Scope of Work. The QARP shall detail specific review levels and document review
content for all meeting minutes, studies,reports,plans, drawings, specifications and other project
deliverables provided to the Council. The Project Schedule shall reflect the review dates for each
review level, meeting dates, and anticipated Council review duration. The Consultant shall
provide separate written responses to comments for all review levels.
The Consultant shall conduct deliverable review meetings with Council for each project
deliverable at each review level. The Consultant's Project Manager, in consultation with
Council's Project Manager, will prepare an agenda and identify the personnel to be present at
each meeting.
QA/QC team should be disclosed and can not be changed without Council approval. A single
QA/QC coordinator may assist the consistency of the documents.
The following review levels should be used as a guide. Each level will require a Draft and Final
SubmittaL•
Preliminary Design
Midcourse Design
Final Design
Bid Ready Contract Manual and Drawings
Internal QC Review
The Consultant will conduct its own internal peer review during the planning, design, and
construction phases. The Consultant shall not submit documents for review prior to completion
of the corresponding internal QC review. The process shall be described in the proposal. The
Consultant shall conduct internal QC reviews that as a minimum correspond to the Council's QA
review levels.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 4
The purpose of this review is to ensure the discipline design concepts are correctly applied, the
design computations are reviewed and checked, and potential problem areas or coordination
conflicts are identified to assure high quality and consistent products.
This review will be accomplished by Consultant senior project managers and/or senior design
group heads. The Consultant shall provide a list of names of the QC team. The QC team will
review the entire design to help ensure coordination between Consultant and its subconsultants,
and product quality.
Deliverable: Three (3) copies of all quality assurance review submittals. Three (3) copies of the
minutes of all meetings. Written response to Council's review comments.
2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE
TASK 2.1 PRELIMINARY DESIGN WORKSHOP
Objective: Gain a full understanding of Council stakeholders'— (Council's Operations, Design,
Maintenance, Planner groups) goals, objectives, and concerns for the project. Present work
processes, criteria, and schedules for the Design Report phase. Solicit feedback from Council
staff.
Descri tp ion: Discuss and identify various alternatives that may be available. Review Council's
operational views and requirements relative to alternative evaluation. Discuss and determine the
methodology by which the proposed methods, alignments, and alternate configurations will be
evaluated and compared. Present work plans and schedules and solicit feedback for the
following:
• Aerial mapping
• Geotechnical investigation
• Wetland and flood mapping
• Utility mapping
• Property acquisition
• Life cycle cost estimating
• Public involvement
Deliverable: A workshop agenda will be prepared and detailed minutes will be taken. A
written summary of the workshop will be prepared and three (3) copies will be delivered within
five(5) working days of the workshop.
TASK 2.2 PRELIMINARY DATA REVIEW
Obiective: To obtain and compile aerial mapping, utility, geological, natural resources, and
environmental site data of all potential interceptor corridors to facilitate planning.
Description: Prepare a preliminary data review utilizing the following sources of information:
• The most recently available aerial mapping from City, County, or MnDOT sources. Recently
collected aerial photography compiled at greater than 1:600 scale may be used for the
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 5
preliminary data review, however, base mapping for record drawings should meet the design
requirements.
• Corridor topography collected from available topographic maps, record drawings, or other
survey sources along potential corridors.
• Record drawings for public utilities from the City, County, and MnDOT.
• Schedules for street and highway improvements from the City, County, and MnDOT.
• Record drawings for private utilities.
• Surficial and bedrock geology information from the County Geologic Atlas along potential
interceptor corridors. Supplement the geologic information with any site-specific sources
available from the Minnesota Geological Survey, local well drillers' 1ogs, or other sources.
• Regulatory agency file review of identifiable sites along the comdor to include: site specific
spill, Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST), Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup
(VIC), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Minnesota Environmental
Response and Liability Act(MERLA) files
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodway and National Wetlands
Inventory (NWI) wetland mapping. Supplement with any available County or City mapping
of floodways and wetlands.
• Regionally Significant Ecological Areas, Regionally Significant Natural Resource Areas,
Significant Natural Areas, and Wildlife Management Area mapping from the DNR.
Deliverables: Plan and profile strip maps for all potential interceptor route corridors and a
written summary of concerns for transportation corridors,utilities, and environmental risks.
TASK 2.3 DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
Objective: Prepare a technical memorandum of project alternatives.
Desc�tion: Prepare a study of alternatives for the project that includes:
• Descriptions including plan and profile figures for alternative gravity or forcemain facilities
and alternative alignments.
• Preliminary geotechnical conditions review.
• Utility location and conflict review.
• Preliminary environmental risk review.
• Preliminary right-of-way acquisition assessment. This work should be interfaced with
project staffresponsible for Acquisition Planning under Phase 2.
• Life cycle cost estimates for all project alternatives.
• Schedules for implementation of project alternatives
• A feasibility analysis summary of project alternatives on the basis of constructability,
operability, and costs.
Deliverables: One (1) copy of the memorandum outline prior to development. Three (3) copies
of the memorandum.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 6
TASK 2.4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Objective: To engage the impacted residents, businesses, and organizations and respond to their
specific concerns. This process is to keep the public informed and to draw out, solicit, identify,
and manage issues proactively.
Description: The Consultant shall contract with a communications consultant that is acceptable
to both the Council and the Consultant. Consultant will work with the Council and local
communities to inform area residents, businesses, and organizations of the project, to solicit
comments and to respond to those comments. Prepare for and conduct public information
meetings and also meet with businesses and individuals (in-group settings and individually) as
necessary during the facility planning to inform and receive input from the stakeholder
community regarding the improvements. Consultant to make all necessary arrangements and
preparations including the following:
• Preparation meetings with Council to discuss specifics of ineeting content and
responsibilities.
• Obtain mailing list from the County, include organizations and agencies involved, and
prepare meeting notice mailing labels.
• Draft Public Information Meeting Notice with Council's input.
• Prepare meeting agendas.
• Secure and make arrangements for the Public Information Meetings locations.
• Create all exhibits and MS Power Point slide presentation for the Public Information
Meetings.
• Conduct Public Information Meetings.
• Record Public Information Meetings minutes and public comments.
• Distribute Public Information Meeting minutes and public comments within 15 days.
Deliverable: Exhibits, Power Point slides presentation, written record of Public Information
Meetings minutes and comments.
TASK 2.5 FACILITY INSPECTION AND CONDITION EVALUATION
Objective: Assessment of existing interceptor and lift station conditions. Determination of
the feasibility to rehabilitate and reuse the existing structures.
Description: Review existing maintenance information and CCTV inspection tapes. Determine
critical inspection information gaps. Review existing information and physically inspect lift
station sites. Assess rehabilitation needs and methods in addition to a recommended
rehabilitation schedule. Summarize the results of the reviews.
Deliverables: One (1) copy of the memorandum outline prior to development of the
memorandum. Three(3) copies of the memorandum.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 7
TASK 2.6 WETLAND AND FLOOD PLAIN REVIEW
Objective: Identify wetlands and flood plains that will be impacted by construction of the
interceptor facilities and determine whether any wetland or flood plain mitigation will be
required.
Description: Review wetland and flood plain mapping included in the Facility Plan and
conduct a field reconnaissance of areas potentially affected by the construction of proposed
facilities. Meet with local governing units and the DNR as necessary to identify and avoid
wetlands if possible or to evaluate and determine the need for potential mitigation if avoiding
them is not possible.
Deliverable: Three (3) copies of the findings of the wetland and flood plain review will be
prepared including recommendations for further work.
TASK 2.7 EVALUATION OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
Objective: Prepare a technical memorandum evaluating project alternatives.
Description: Conduct an evaluation of alternative solutions incorporating the findings of
geotechnicai, environmental, wetland, and flood plain reviews, the results of facility inspections,
and public response. Include findings from the Preliminary Data Review and Development of
Project Alternatives tasks.
The evaluation should be based upon criteria of costs (including capital, operating, and life
cycle), sustainability, environment impacts, operation and maintenance concerns, and ability to
implement. The evaluation should be summarized in a matrix of project alternatives and criteria.
Deliverables: One (1) copy of the evaluation matrix and one (1) copy of the memorandum
outline prior to development. Three (3) copies of the memorandum.
TASK 2.8 TECHNICAL REVIEW
Objective: An independent review of the project alternatives evaluation and proposed
recommended plan.
Description: The Council will select the members of the technical review panel. The Consultant
shall be responsible for the coordination of the technical review panel. This includes:
• Provide review materials. Consultant shall provide a copy of the project alternatives
evaluation, recommended plan proposal, supporting materials, calculations, and reference
materials to each of the technical review panel. Consultant staff shall be made available for
interviews by the technical review panel.
• Schedule and conduct the technical review panel workshop. Solicit comments and prepare
meeting minutes.
• Provide comment responses. Consultant shall review the technical review panel's findings
and provide a written response to the technical review panel and Council. The consultant will
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
, Page 8
incorporate findings (as determined by the Council) into the project alternatives evaluation
and recommended plan.
Deliverables: Ten (10) copies of the review materials, meeting minutes, and comment responses.
TASK 29 RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION
Objective: Prepare a technical memorandum incorporating Technical Review comments for
Council use in preparing the Preliminary Design Report(PDR).
Description: Develop the recommended plan in sufficient detail to allow proceeding with the
preparation of plans and specifications, including the following:
• Forcemain alignment and profile
• Hydraulic design basis
• Site plan and property requirements
• Constructability concerns and solutions
• Specialty engineering design criteria
• Utility conflict solutions
• Operation during construction/bypass requirements
• Optimization opportunities
• Schedule and cost
• Operations and maintenance considerations
Upon Consultant submission of the technical memorandum, Council Project Manager
completion of the PDR, and written approval of the PDR by the Council Engineering Manager,
project elements will be under a design concept"freeze".
Deliverables: Three (3) copies of the memorandum.
3 DESIGN PHASE
TASK 3.1 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Objective: Prepare for and conduct public information meetings and/or workshops to inform and
receive input from the stakeholder community regarding construction of the project. Engage the
impacted residents and businesses and respond to their specific concerns in order to gain public
acceptance of the proposed interceptor implementation.
Descri tion: The Consultant shall contract with a communications consultant that is acceptable
to both the Council and the Consultant. Consultant will work with the Council and local
communities to inform area residents, businesses, and organizations of the project, to solicit
comments and to respond to those comments. Prepare for and conduct public information
meetings and also meet with businesses and individuals (in-group settings and individually) as
necessary during the facility planning to inform and receive input from the stakeholder
community regarding the improvements. Consultant to make all necessary arrangements and
preparations including the following:
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 9
• Preparation meetings with Council to discuss specifics of ineeting content and
responsibilities.
• Obtain mailing list from the County, include organizations and agencies involved, and
prepare meeting notice mailing labels.
• Draft Public Infortnation Meeting Notice with Council's input.
• Prepare meeting agendas.
• Secure and make arrangements for the Public Information Meetings locations.
• Create all exhibits and MS Power Point slide presentation for the Public Information
Meetings.
• Conduct Public Information Meetings.
• Record Public Information Meetings minutes and public comments.
• Distribute Public Information Meeting minutes and public comments within 15 days.
Deliverable: Exhibits, Power Point slides presentation, written record of Public Information
Meetings minutes and comments.
TASK 3.2 SURVEY AND MAPPING
Objective: Update and verify the ground control surveys, topographic survey, and engineering
base map and incorporate survey data collected from land acquisition activities completed by
CounciL
Descri tion: Update survey and mapping necessary to produce an engineering base map for the
design. Include the following:
• Conduct any required ground control surveys for aerial photography.
• Obtain aerial photography of sufficient quality and accuracy for 1:600 scale mapping.
• Map found or placed monuments; easements; locations of buildings, walls, fences, streets,
driveways, alleys, sidewalks, parking areas, and other structures; trees and landscaping, and
location of water features.
• Prepare two-foot elevation contours.
• Reference project coordinates to existing horizontal and vertical control points.
• Tie-in locatable property corners.
• Map property and easement lines. Include property owners' names and property ID
numbers.
� Map boundaries of all property interests to be acquired
Deliverable: One AutoCAD� drawing file and one (1) paper copy of the engineering base map
using a county coordinate system. One set of aerial photographs.
TASK 3.3 UTILITY LOCATIONS AND MAPPING
Objective: Determine the type and location of existing utilities within the construction corridor
for design purposes. Show existing utility locations on the plan and profile sheets.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 10
Descri tp ion: Conduct utility surveys at the quality level necessary as defined by the Standard
Guideline for Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data (CUASCE 38-02,
2002). Prepare mapping and conduct meetings with utility owners in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, section 216D.04. Submit Gopher State One Call Design Locate tickets, investigate and
map all utilities in corridor. Obtain invert elevations, size, and materials of storm and sanitary
sewers. Contact utility companies for maps of their utilities in the corridor. Map water lines
using City plan sheets from field locations of valves and hydrants. Map gas, electric, telephone,
fiber optic, and cable TV from utility maps and field marks from design locate tickets and
markings made for soil borings during the geotechnical investigation. The horizontal location
and vertical elevation of the utilities will be determined. Existing utilities will be shown on the
plan/profile sheets.
Make arrangements for and conduct meetings with utility owners to communicate the project
design and coordinate utility relocation. Either the Council's Project Manger or a representative
of Council shall be present at the meetings.
The engineer will indicate the indicated quality level (A, B, C, or D) for each noted area on the
plans according to CUASCE 38-02. Areas of mixed quality level will include a written summary
with the line code, description, quality level, utility attribute, and notes. All Quality Level A
data will be summarized similar to the example supplemental data form in CUASCE 38-02 and
attached to the contract documents.
Deliverable: One AutoCAD� drawing file and one (1) paper copy of the survey and utility
mapping engineering base map.
TASK 3.4 WETLAND DELINEATION AND MAPPING
Objective: Identify wetlands that will be impacted by construction of the interceptor and
determine whether any wetland mitigation will be required.
Description: Meet with local governing units and the DNR as necessary to identify and avoid
wetlands if possible or to evaluate and determine the need for potential mitigation if avoiding
them is not possible. Wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed alignment/corridor will be
delineated. The x, y, and z coordinates of the delineated boundaries will be surveyed and
mapped on the project digital map base.
Deliverable: Three (3) copies of wetland delineation study report and findings. One (1)
AutoCAD�drawing file and one(1)paper copy of the wetland delineation mapping.
TASK 3.5 GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW AND BASE LINE REPORT
Objective: Define soil types and groundwater conditions along the proposed alignment and
construction corridor. Determine soil parameters and groundwater conditions for the final
alignment's design. Prepare Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR) for tunneled, directionally
drilled, and jacked interceptor segments.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 11
Descri tp ion: The geotechnical investigation program will review available information. Jacked
or tunneled segments shall be particularly investigated for the presence of cobbles or boulders.
Define areas of poor soils, bedrock and high groundwater along the proposed alignment for
purposes of completing final design.
The GBR will be prepared in general accordance with the guidelines and practices presented by
ASCE in a special publication entitled "Geotechnical Baseline Reports for Underground
Construction" and will include:
• An evaluation of the subsurface conditions encountered including description and
engineering characteristics (strength, compressibility, permeability, etc.) of the strata
encountered will be presented as design parameter values for basis of all design issues
regarding shafts, directional drilling, and tunneling.
• Groundwater levels and groundwater conditions expected and a quantity of groundwater
delineated along the tunnel (station to station) that needs to be appropriately controlled by the
contractor.
• A discussion of appropriate construction techniques necessary to properly construct the
project with supporting rationale and stating specifically methods that cannot be used, if any.
• The behavior of the ground with regard to appropriate methods of excavation, installation of
excavation support, directional drilling, tunneling and impacts on adjacent facilities will be
presented as means of establishing a bid price to cover the cost of this work.
• A discussion of sources of potential difficulty or hazard that could impact the construction
progress, such as boulders, nested boulders, mixed face soil/rock, contaminated ground,
groundwater, soil behavior, and subsurface obstructions will be presented. Quantities of each
item will be established so that they can be accounted for in the appropriate bid item.
• The reasons for important or unusual construction specifications or requirements will be
presented.
The GBR will be signed and sealed by the lead geotechnical engineer and a Minnesota registered
professional engineer and provided for incorporation with the construction Contract Documents.
Deliverable: Three(3) copies of the geotechnical baseline report.
TASK 3.6 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE CONTINGENCY AND SITE SAFETY AND
HEALTH PLANS
Objective: Prepare Site Contingency and Site Safety and Health Plans to protect public health
and the environment.
Description: Prepare plans and reports required to protect workers associated with construction,
protect the public, and mitigate potential environmental impacts identified in the Facility Plan.
Planning and reporting shall be conducted under the authority of the MPCA Voluntary
Investigation and Cleanup program.
Prepare and update Site Contingency Plans and Site Safety and Health Plans for the project. Site
Safety and Health Plans shall meet the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120. Consultant shall gain
approval from the MPCA for all Site Contingency Plans.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 12
Deliverable: Three (3) copies of draft Site Contingency and Site Safety and Health Plans.
Prepare the Site Contingency and site specific Site Safety and Health Plans for all work and for
inclusion with the Contract Documents in the numbers required for each site.
TASK 3.7 MID COURSE DESIGN
Objective: To provide a Mid Course Design Report.
Description: The mid-course design process is a continuous process where the Consultant
identifies issues or details that may differ from the approved PDR. As these issues or details
arise, the Consultant shall initiate a dialogue with the project manager to address those changes.
Once the issue or detail has been resolved, an approval document shall be prepared and signed
by the Project Manager, and approved by the Engineering Manager, to place the revised project
elements back under the design concept "freeze". Resolution of issues shall be based on
"Business Case Evaluation"principles.
All revisions to preliminary design submittal shall be documented in the project record. It is
anticipated that this process will continue throughout the final design schedule and may require a
number of approval documents to be issued.
The Mid Course Design Report will be prepared to include the following information:
• Horizontal and vertical location of structures (lift stations, diversion structures, etc.),
forcemains, and gravity sewers
� Site plans and requirements
• Building layouts and requirements
• Engineering design basis for geotechnical, hydraulic, mechanical, electrical, and HVAC
elements
• Proposed designs/construction methods for dewatering, soil corrections, foundations, and
specialized construction (foundations, soil corrections, tunneling,jacking, and/or directional
drilling)
• Utility conflict solutions and utility relocation plans
• Proposed designs for odor and corrosion control
• Requirements for operation during construction/bypass requirements
• Schedule, construction cost, and operation and maintenance costs
• Operations and maintenance considerations
The Mid Course Design Report shall also include draft Contract specifications and drawings
associated with major elements of the project. These items include:
• Major equipment selections for pumps, valves, meters, controls, and generator sets. Select
piping materials and related sewer appurtenances.
• Major specification sections for equipment, piping, and specialized construction (tunneling,
jacking, and/or directional drilling).
• Preliminary Bid Form (Section 00410) and Summary of Work(Section 01010).
• Preliminary drawings.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 13
Deliverable: Four (4) copies of the draft Mid Course Design Report with drawings, graphics,
tables, and appendix containing supporting documentation for Project Manager review and
approval. Ten (10) paper copies of the final Mid Course Design Report for Technical Review
Panel Review.
TASK 3.8 TECHNICAL REVIEW PANEL—MID COURSE DESIGN
Ob'ective: An independent review and value engineering assessment of the Mid Course Design
Report.
Descri tp ion: the Council will select the members of the technical review panel. The Consultant
shall be responsible for the coordination of the technical review panel. This includes:
• Provide review materials. Consultant shall provide copies of the final Mid Course Design
Report as described in Task 3.7. Consultant staff will be available for interviews by the
technical review panel.
• Schedule and conduct the technical review panel workshop. The workshop may be divided
into two sessions as required. In the first workshop session, the technical review panel will
critique proposed designs, sewer alignments, locations of structures, design basis, property
and operational requirements, and project schedule and cost. In the second session, the
technical review panel will critique, specialized construction (foundations, soil corrections,
tunneling, jacking, and/or directional drilling), set bid document requirements, provide
recommendations for qualifying construction firms, and develop risk-sharing concepts.
Consultant will solicit comments and prepare meeting minutes from all sessions.
• Provide comment responses. Consultant shall review the technical review panel's findings
and provide a written response to the technical review panel and Council. The consultant will
incorporate findings (as determined by the Council) into the Final Design Report.
Deliverables: Ten (10) copies of the review materials,meeting minutes, and comment responses.
TASK 3.9 FINAL DESIGN
Obictive: To produce complete Drawings, Specifications, and a Final Design Report.
Descri tp ion: In addition to preparing complete Drawings and Specifications, the Consultant
shall prepare a Final Design Report including the following.
• Contractor qualification requests and selection requirements
• Project specific Division O documents
• Permits
• Floodway and wetland mitigation plans
• Environmental contingency plan
• Construction precondition assessment, vibration monitoring, settlement monitoring, materials
testing, and survey plan
• Operation and maintenance requirements during construction
• Construction cost estimate
• Construction schedule
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 14
Detailed construction Drawings will include all drawings and elements required to accurately
depict the project, including:
• Plan views
• Profiles
• Sections
• Elevations
• Details
• Schematics
• Schedules
� Typical Details
Drawings will be prepared in accordance with MCES AutoCAD� Standards and MCES General
Requirements for Bidding Documents. The drawings will be consistent with Federal, State, and
local codes, rules and regulations, accepted professional design standards, MPCA, and EPA
criteria. The drawings will be certified by an engineer registered to practice in the State of
Minnesota and will meet the technical requirements of the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority
(PFA) Loan Program.
Calculations required for the detailed design will be maintained in a neat and orderly fashion in
accordance with Council's requirements, with all calculations identified by date, subject, and
design and reviewed, and will support the information shown on the drawings. Calculations will
be made available for review by Council's staff.
Specifications will be prepared in Council's standard format utilizing Council's guide
specifications. The Consultant shall prepare concise and clear descriptions of each process
system operation. The descriptions will be incorporated in the specifications where appropriate
and will be submitted in digital format to Council for later incorporation into the operation and
maintenance manuaL
Deliverable: Four (4) hard copies of the draft Final Design Report, one (1) AutoCAD�and (4)
half size paper copies Drawings, and one (1) Microsoft� Word file and four (4) paper copies of
the Specifications for Project Manager review and approval. Ten (10) paper copies of the final
Final Design Report, Drawings,and Specifications for Technical Review Panel Review.
TASK 3.10 TECHNICAL REVIEW PANEL—FINAL DESIGN
Objective: An independent review and value engineering assessment of the Final Design Report,
Drawings, and Specifications.
Descri tion: the Council will select the members of the technical review panel. The Consultant
shall be responsible for the coordination of the technical review panel. This includes:
• Provide review materials. Consultant shall provide copies of the final Final Design Report,
Drawings and Specifications as described in Task 3.7. Consultant staff will be available for
interviews by the technical review panel.
• Schedule and conduct the technical review panel workshop. The workshop may be divided
into two sessions as required. In the first workshop session, the technical review panel will
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 15
critique proposed designs, sewer alignments, locations of structures, design basis, property
and operational requirements, and project schedule and cost. In the second session, the
technical review panel will critique, specialized construction (foundations, soil corrections,
tunneling, jacking, and/or directional drilling), set bid document requirements, provide
recommendations for qualifying construction firms, and develop risk-sharing concepts.
Consultant will solicit comments and prepare meeting minutes from all sessions.
• Provide comment responses. Consultant shall review the technical review panel's findings
and provide a written response to the technical review panel and Council. The consultant will
incorporate findings (as determined by the Council) into the Bid Ready Design.
Deliverables: Ten (10) copies of the review materials,meeting minutes, and comment responses.
TASK 3.11 BID READY CONTRACT MANUAL AND DRAWINGS
Objective: To produce a bid ready Contract Manual and Drawing set.
Description: The bid ready Drawings will incorporate Final Design Technical Review
Committee comments and be prepared in accordance with Task 3.9.
A two-volume Contract Manual will be developed. The Contract Manual will be prepared in
accordance with the Construction Specification Institute (CSI) "Manual of Practice", as modified
by the Council's General Requirements for Bidding Documents. The manual will be prepared
for bidding and award to one(1)prime contractor.
Volume I of the Contract Manual will include the front-end documents and technical
specifications. The Consultant will prepare project specific Division O documents. The Council
will furnish a completed master documents paper copy subsequent to the Bid Form (Section
00410) and preceding the Summary of Work(Section 01010).
For developing technical specification sections, the Consultant will use the Council's Guide
Specifications, modifying and supplementing them as necessary.
Volume II of the Contract Manual will include the following:
• List of submittals specified in the Contract Manual to be furnished by the Contractor
• List of tests to be furnished by the Contractor and Council
• Geotechnical information used for the Geotechnical Baseline Report
� Copies of permits
• Other items identified by Council
TASK 3.12 SUPPORT OF SECURING PERMITS AND REGULATORY APPROVALS
Ob'ectl ive: Apply for and secure the required permits and regulatory approvals.
Descri tion: The Consultant will assist the Council in securing the required permits and
approvals for each interceptor branch by providing supplemental documents as needed for
applications, attending meetings with responsible authorities and preparing written responses to
agency and public questions.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 16
Permits include but are not limited to:
• City and County Right of Way(ROW) Permits
• Mn/DOT ROW Permits
• MPCA on EAW
• MPCA Sewer Extension and NPDES General Stormwater Permits
• MPCA Approval of Plans and Specifications
• DNR Permit to Work in Protected Waters or License to Cross State Lands or Waters
• Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
• Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit to Install Underground Utilities
• Railroad Crossing Permit(s)
• Local Government Unit Wetland Permits
• Local Government Conditional Use Permits
Deliverable: Supplemental documents in the form and number requested by the Council.
TASK 3.13 CONSULTANT'S ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COST
Objective: Prepare a preliminary Estimate of Construction Costs (ECC) at the Preliminary
Design, Mid Course Design, and Final Design phases. Prepare a final ECC, including all
addenda items, five (5)days before bid.
Descri tion: The Consultant will prepare a detailed ECC for the facilities included in the
bidding documents at the intervals described above. The ECC will reflect local pricing
conditions and will have a target accuracy of within 10 percent of the Contractor's bid price.
The minimum detail provided will include an estimate for each line item of the unit bid price
schedule.
Deliverable: One (1) electronic and four (4) paper copies of ECCs at the intervals described
above.
TASK 3.14 BID PHASE SUPPORT
Objective: Support the Council's staff in soliciting bids for constructing the project and
preparing addenda.
Description: The Consultant will assist the Council by:
• Responding to plan holder questions
• Preparing and certifying addenda for distribution by Council
• Attending a pre-bid conference and project site tour
Deliverable: Copies of the addenda in the format and number required by the Council for each
Project.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 17
4 CONSTRiJCTION PHASE
TASK 4.1 UTILITY MEETINGS
Objective: Meet with utility owners and construction contractor to review utility protection and
relocation plans.
Description: Make arrangements for and conduct meetings with utility owners in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, section 216D.04. Verify that utilities are shown correctly in the
Contract Drawings. Review the project design, protection measures, and relocation plans with
affected utility owners. The Council's Project Manager and the Council's Authorized
Representative(CAR) shall be present at the meetings.
Coordinate utility location work to be conducted by the construction contractor. Review
example supplemental data forms for Quality Level A utility location work.
Deliverable: Three (3)paper copies of the meeting minutes. Provide copies the CAR, Council's
Project Manager, and the construction contractor.
TASK 4.2 WEEKLY PROGRESS MEETINGS AND SITE VISITS
Objective: Support weekly progress meetings, attend meetings, and make site visits during the
course of the construction project as requested by CounciL
Descri tion: The construction contractor will provide construction staking and that the Council
will provide for full-time construction observation and construction administration. The
Consultant will assist the Council with construction administration by attending the weekly
progress meetings, assisting with interpretation of the intent of the design documents, and
providing technical assistance during the course of the construction project. The Consultant will
periodically visit the project site and update Council on observations.
Deliverable: Letters, reports, and supporting documentation as necessary to assist Council to
administer the construction contract for each project.
TASK 4.3 REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR'S SUBMITTALS
Objective: Provide technical review of all contractor submittals required by Section 01300 of the
Contract Manual.
Description: The Consultant will review all submittals required by Section 01300 of the
Contract Manual including shop drawings and submittals for materials and equipment, working
drawings, and submittals for specified construction methods and quality control testing reports.
Deliverable: Return the shop drawirigs, working drawings and test reports with acceptability or
non-acceptability notation and appropriate comments with timeframe stated in construction
contract documents.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 18
TASK 4.4 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES
Objective: Provide construction inspection services.
Descri tp ion: The Council will provide Council Authorized Representative (CAR) Services. The
Consultant shall provide two (2) full time resident inspectors during construction activities to
support the CAR.
Deliverable: Three (3) copies of inspector resumes for Council review and approval. Three
copies of field reports submitted on a weekly basis on forms approved by the Project Manager.
TASK 4.5 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
Objective: Provide construction surveying services.
Descri tp ion: Plan and implement construction surveys for the project. Work shall include
surveying and staking of Construction Limits prior to starting the construction; surveying to
measure quantities for payment; and surveying and staking of surface improvements including
pavements, storm drainage lines, catch basins, concrete curb and gutter,walks,trails, and grading.
Provide immediate updates of all field collected data to the Council's Authorized Representative
(CAR) at the project field office. Immediately inform the CAR and Council's Project Manager
of survey locations that fail the requirements of the project drawings and specifications. Provide
a weekly summary to the CAR prior to the weekly progress meeting indicating what survey work
was completed and the results. Maintain copies of all data compiled into a single file.
Deliverable: Three (3) copies of the construction survey plan. Provide weekly work summaries
and results. Organize and provide the data in the manner as required by the CAR.
TASK 4.6 REVIEW OF FIELD ORDERS AND CHANGE ORDERS
Objective: Review field and change orders as requested by the Council Project Manager.
Provide written analysis and recommendations for action.
Descri tion: The Consultant will review field orders and change orders, and will provide written
analysis and recommendations for final action within 5 working days.
Deliverable: Written analysis with recommendations for each field order or change order for
each project.
TASK 4.7 DRAFT FACILITY MANUAL
Objective: Production of draft Facility Manual.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 19
Description: Format, write, assemble, and deliver the draft Facility Manual. The Facility
Manual shall follow format, organization, and contain similar features, graphics, photographs,
and content as the sample manual provided by the Council. Consultant shall make site visits to
obtain supplemental digital photographs of equipment and facility features not contained in the
construction photographs.
In addition,the following subtasks shall be completed the following subtasks:
• Provide hydraulic grade line and system/pump curves graphics and calculations in written
and electronic formats. Calculations shall be prepared using Excel spreadsheet software.
• Prepare clear and concise descriptions of the operation of each major process system in
written and electronic formats.
• Provide CAD drawing files in preparing Facility Manual graphics.
Council Responsibilitv: Council will provide construction photographs for incorporation into the
manual.
Deliverables: One (1) copy in Acrobat� PDF format and one (1) copy in Microsoft� Word
format of the draft Facility Manual for each Project.
TASK 4.8 FINAL FACILITY MANUAL
Objective: Production of final Facility Manual.
Descri tion: Format, write, assemble, and deliver the final Facility Manual. The Facility
Manual shall follow format, organization, and contain similar features, graphics, photographs,
and content as the sample manual provided by the Council. Consultant shall make site visits to
obtain supplemental digital photographs of equipment and facility features not contained in the
construction photographs. The final Facility Manual shall have all Council's review comments
and additions fully reconciled and incorporated.
Deliverables: One (1) copy in Acrobat� PDF format and one (1) copy in Microsoft� Word of
the final facility manual for each Project. One (1) original and two (2) bound copies of the
complete Facility Manual for each Project.
TASK 4.9 OPERATOR MANUAL
Objective: Production of Operator Manual.
Description: The Operator Manual is a document specifically designed for operations
personnel. It contains only information from the Facility Manual essential for operators to
optimize facility operations. The Operator Manual is intended to serve as a reference document,
to be used in the field, providing quick access to the vital information. The Manual shall follow
similar format, organization, and contain similar features, graphics, photographs, and content as
the sample manual provided by the Council.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 20
Deliverables: One (1) original and three (3) copies of the Operator Manual for each Project.
One (1) copy in Acrobat� PDF format and related files on CD-ROM for each Project. Provide
one (1) copy in Microsoft�Word and related files on CD-ROM for each project.
TASK 4.10 INTERACTIVE FACILITY MANUAL
Obiective: Production of an interactive Facility Manual.
Descri tp ion: An Interactive Facility Manual shall be prepared using the Final Facility Manual
and the Acrobat� PDF format document management system. The Manual shall be provided on
CD-ROM with document search capabilities, interactive links, and other features to facilitate
easy access to select information. The Interactive Facility Manual shall follow format,
organization, and contain similar features, graphics, photographs, and content as the sample
manual provided by the CounciL
Deliverables: Final Interactive Facility Manual on CD-ROM for each Project.
TASK 4.11 AS-RECORDED CONTRACT DRAWINGS
Obiective: Prepare as-recorded contract drawings.
Description: The Consultant will obtain surveyed x, y, z coordinates for all structure rim and
invert elevations and enter this data on the as-recorded contract drawings. All pertinent notes
compiled from the Council's construction observation field drawing sets will also be entered on
the as-recorded contract drawings.
Deliverable: One (1) set of AutoCAD� drawing files, one (1) full-size set of Mylar prints, and
three (3)paper copies of as-recorded drawings for each Project.
Professional Services Project Delivery Guidelines
Page 21
Exhibit C
Proposed Project Schedule
EXHIBIT C
PROPOSED PROJECT SCI3EDULE
1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain
GENERAL PROJECT SCHEDULE
Consultant NTP December 2011
Construction Bids Received Se tember 2012
Construction Contractor NTP October 2012
Construction Com lete June 2014
CONSULTANT CONTRACT MILESTONES
Prelimina Desi n Re ort Com lete March 2012
Mid Course Desi n Com lete Ma 2012
Final Desi n Com lete Jul 2012
Bid Ready Contract Manual and August 2012
Drawin s Com lete
Attachment to the Proposal Instructions: Scope of Work
Page 1
Exhibit D
Estimated Cost of City Services to Council
M� � �
N V N Q (O
F M � � �
�� � �
O
U
N
a
N �
C �p �� p�°v\j� �M
O
�M tt N M(V M� n .
2 ����
J �
N
C� O
Z U
�
O c`,
U �
O '�
� w
�Nj J O O O O O O O O O O O O O N��N�p
� '� ��d' d' (O V d' V CO W lD fD �p (''p��
' O �f9�fA
� a
W c
p fA FL°
H
m V o
_ � � o 0 00°o�°n �
W � � d°.�oo o°oN o00o v ���
M
� �� ����
� Q
�
C� N
c o 0 0
0 0
O � O O O O �O O O O O O O ��0 O O
W cOaDODOD NcO�F V N MM� � '� mCOQ)
FW,. '� �N���
Q U
�
~
� �
W c o�a�Ov
� O O O O O O O O O O O O �°��M
W t0 Cfl o0 00 c0 R V N a0 N a0 V �����
T �69 EA
U
`o
N V
r
O L
0. U
d C �
d' O
C �
O
M
O _ V N
a �`' � °�
in �n a ° � U
5 z
N j `��iS �+ ._�.
� y 3
C � � Vl N C � �
O �
C �- G. C� � � G U
� �p� a C a m�W N �O m N� N
•w N N fOd O �� dU� � � Oe CN ��
� L
c�i °-�o ��m� � NC� $ = ��r K°� �-�
A W �
.a €� � °' > °�� y O�' c �° '�g a`m � m��0
J rn c >.� p c o �°tS V a d '�� H o p d � ��°v>
�� �-o �-��� �� Y� u a� �o= a m a°1i �n@)@)c in
i�ic� ao v�«� � via�= ��Z o a� «m � mmrna� o
a� m � °U m 3�- a�a m�w EY = m R 1° m a� rnc E U
�an.a� �a�1-� � o E a� R � d£ c � m a'� '.3
= �NaO� t.- MOD LNO 0 � O 01 > fA 'C G7 � •— O Q O
a M M M c'� a �t �'�d' a 1n op U � F�a Q W LL � LL T2 U W f-
SEGMENT 2
AMENDED AND RESTATED
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
1 -GV-461 Relief Lift Station and
Forcemain Project
The City of Golden Valley will be responsible for the design and construction of
the Circle Down portion (cul-de-sac to Turners Crossroad) of the forcemain
installation. Under this agreement Golden Valley will:
• Hire Consultant to design this forcemain and be reimbursed by MCES up
to $40,000.
• Hire Consultant to complete all construction engineering on this segment
and be reimbursed by MCES up to $110,000.
• Receive $41,000 in reimbursement for contract administration assistance.
• Receive $10,000 in reimbursement for land acquisition assistance.
• Be reimbursed by MCES for the majority of the Circle Down/Turners
Crossroad street reconstruction items up to $1,378,000.
• Pay for curb installation and public utility improvements on Circle
Down/Turners Crossroad up to $262,000.
Met Council#11I031 Amendment#1
AMENDED AND RESTATED COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain Project
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ("Agreement")
is made and entered into as of ,by and between the City of Golden
Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and the Metropolitan Council, a public
corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota("Council").
BACKGROUND RECITALS
1. On July 13, 2011, the City and Council entered into a design services Cooperative
Agreement (the "Initial Agreement") which set forth the terms and conditions under which the
Council and City would support and execute certain tasks related to the design of the Circle
Down segment of the 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain Project, referred to in the
Agreement as the "Council Forcemain."
2. The parties now have determined that it is in their best interests to continue to
design and construct the Council Forcemain and therefore to amend and fully restate the Initial
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION THE RECEIl'T OF
WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, the parties agree to amend and fully restate the
Initial Agreement as follows:
° Page 1
AMENDED AND RESTATED COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
RECITALS
1. The City has authorized and intends to start removal and replacement of a street
named Circle Down as part of their Pavement Management Program on or about April l, 2012.
Construction will include full width pavement removal and replacement of approximately 1750
lineal feet of street, stormwater drainage improvements, and landscaping. For the purposes of
this Agreement, this project is called the "City Project". The location of the City Project is
shown in Exhibit A of this Agreement.
2. The Council, as part of its metropolitan wastewater treatment facilities, proposes
to design and construct a lift station and 18-inch diameter forcemain through the City to increase
capacity and improve redundancy and reliability of its interceptor facilities in the City and St.
Louis Park service areas. Construction will include installation of a 5 million gallon per day
(MGD) capacity lift station in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Interstate I-394 and
Hwy 100 and 18-inch diameter forcemain from the lift station to the Council owned Plymouth
Forcemains north of Hwy 55. Part of the proposed forcemain route is Circle Down as shown in
Exhibit A.
3. The Council has determined that it can best utilize its staff and financial resources
by providing for the design and construction of the Council Forcemain by the City.
4. The Council is authorized by Minnesota Statutes § 473.504 to construct any
interceptor or treatment works determined to be necessary or convenient for the collection and
disposal of sewage in the metropolitan area and (under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
§ 471.59 (providing for joint or cooperative action between governmental units including the
Page 2
Council and City)), contract with any governmental unit for the performance, on the Council's
behalf, of any service the governmental unit is authorized to provide for itself.
5. The 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Forcemain Project is duly authorized by the
Council and will be included in Council's 2012 Capital Improvement Plan.
6. The Council and the City agree that each is authorized to enter into this
Agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, Metropolitan Council Action No. 2011-134
and City Council Resolution dated , and that the Council Forcemain
may be carried out by the parties hereto as provided by this Agreement under the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes § 471.59.
REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Page 3
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which has
been agreed to by the parties, the Council and the City agree as follows:
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions under which the
Council and City will support and execute certain tasks related to the City Project and the
Council Forcemain, and under which the Council and City will reimburse each other for costs
associated with these tasks.
II. CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT
l. The Council hereby consents to and appoints the City as its agent to design and
construct the Council Forcemain and incorporate the Council Forcemain into the City Project.
2. The City has contracted Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. ("Consultant") to provide
engineering services for the City Project. The City shall obtain a fee quote for professional
engineering services from the Consultant to provide engineering services for the Council
Forcemain including design, production of construction Documents, and construction support
("Engineering Services"). Construction documents will include plans, specifications, bidding
documents, and a proposed schedule for the Council Forcemain (collectively the "Construction
Documents"). Construction support will include staking, project representation, observation, and
production of record plans for the Council Forcemain. If the Consultant's fee quote is not
acceptable to the Council, the Council shall have the right to terminate or amend this Agreement.
3. The City shall engage a construction contractor ("City Contractor") to construct
the Council Forcemain in accordance with the Construction Documents prepared by the
Consultant and in accordance with this Agreement.
Page 4
III. COUNCIL FORCEMAIN DESIGN PHASE
l. Exhibit B contains the Scope of Work for the design of the Council Forcemain.
Upon full execution of this Agreement, the City will engage the Consultant to prepare the
Construction Documents based on the Scope of Work.
2. The City shall provide the Council notice of and the Council shall participate in
progress meetings with the Consultant to confirm that the Consultant is proceeding in accordance
with the Council's Scope of Work and the Council's requirements.
3. The City shall require the Consultant to prepare and submit the Construction
Documents to Council for review. The Council shall perform review and approval in accordance
with the Consultant's proposed schedule.
4. The Council shall have the right to require modifications to the Scope of Work
and Contract Documents by written notice to the City identifying the required modifications. If
the Council requests a modification that is an additional service under the Consultant's contract
with the City, the City sha11 submit the required modification to the Consultant and solicit a
proposal from the Consultant identifying the cost and schedule impact associated with
performing the additional service. The City shall not order the Consultant to proceed with
modifications until the Council has agreed in writing to the Consultant's proposal and until the
City determines that the modification will not adversely impact the City Project, including the
City Project schedule. The cost of modifications required and approved by the Council shall be
the responsibility of the Council unless otherwise agreed in writing by the City and the Council.
Page 5
5. The Council agrees that acceptance of the Construction Documents by the
Council for bid shall be deemed to be a representation by the Council that the Council has
reviewed the Construction Documents and found them complete.
6. The Council and City each have the right to terminate this Ageement by written
notice to each other.
IV. COUNCIL FORCEMAIN CONSTRUCTION PHASE
l. The City shall administer the contract with the Consultant for Engineering
Services during construction of the Council Forcemain. The Council will inspect Council
Forcemain for progress and compliance with the Construction Documents. Except as otherwise
provided in this Agreement, the City shall require the Consultant to provide services in
accordance with the Scope of Work and shall not make or allow any changes to the Scope of
Work.
2. Upon receipt of the Council approved Construction Documents, the City will
incorporate the Construction Documents into the construction documents for the City Project in
such a way that the costs of the Council Forcemain will be differentiated from the costs of the
City Project. The City will solicit bids from qualified construction contractors for the Council
Forcemain pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.345. Upon receipt of bids, the City shall tabulate
bids, differentiating the costs for the Council Forcemain from the costs of the City Project, and
submit to the Council a recommendation for selection of a bidder and award of contract to the
lowest responsive, responsible bidder based on lowest aggregate bid for the City Project and the
Council Forcemain combined. The Council shall have three (3)business days to review the bids
and the City recommendation, and either accept or reject the bids and the City's
recommendation. If the Council rejects the City's recommended bidder, the City may choose to
Page 6
either rebid the project or award the contract and eliminate the Council Forcemain items, via
change order, and proceed with the award of the project. If the Council rejects any or all bids
and/or the City's recommended selection of a bidder, the Council will provide to the City, in
writing, the reasons for such rejection. If the City chooses to award the contract and move
forward with construction of the City Project excluding the Council Forcemain items, this
Agreement shall automatically terminate. Subsequent to the Council's rejection of the City's
recommendation for selection of a bidder and/or award of a contract, if the Council and City
mutually agree, the City may re-advertise for bids. Immediately upon opening the second set of
bids, the City and Council shall follow the procedure set forth in this paragraph with respect to
tabulation of bids, recommendation for selection of a bidder and acceptance or rejection of
bidder by the Council. If the Council again rejects any or all bids and/or awaxd recommended by
the City, this Agreement shall automatically terminate. In the event this Agreement terminates in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the Council shall pay the City for design and
administrative fees actually expended by the City for the Council Forcemain in accordance with
the terms of this Agreement.
3. 'The City acknowledges that the Council's decision on whether to accept the bids
and the City's recommendation for selection of a bidder and award of contract may require
approval from the Council due to statutory, regulatory, or policy restrictions on Council
contracting authority. The Council shall endeavor to identify and obtain any such approvals
within the time allowed in the Council Forcemain Schedule for review and approval. The City
shall endeavor to reasonably accommodate any unanticipated Council approvals.
4. The City shall not award the contract for the City Project incorporating the
Council Forcemain unless the Council has approved the award in writing.
Page 7
5. Not less than seven (7) calendar days after the Council has approved the City's
recommendation for selection of a bidder and award of contract, the City shall give written
notice of the pre-construction conference and commencement of the Council Forcemain
construction, said notice to be directed as follows:
General Manager—Environmental Services
Metropolitan Council
390 Robert Street North
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
6. The City shall administer the contract with the City Contractor selected under the
bidding process described above, for construction of the Council Forcemain. Except as provided
by Article 12 of this Section, the City shall require the City Contractor to construct the Council
Forcemain in accordance with the Construction Documents and shall not make or allow any
changes to the Construction Documents. An allowance will be established in the Construction
Documents to pay for costs incurred if changes are required as provided by Articles 12.(a) andlor
12.(b) of this Section.
7. The Council shall appoint a Council's Authorized Representative (CAR), the
person designated in writing by the General Manager of the Council's Environmental Services
Division to represent the Council during construction. The City sha11 notify the Council in
writing of the person it appoints as its representative during construction.
8. The CAR shall make periodic visits to the construction site to determine whether
the Council Forcemain is being constructed in accordance with the Construction Documents and
be responsible for observation of the work. The CAR shall not direct the City Contractor. If the
Council reasonably determines that the work is not being properly constructed in accordance
with the Construction Documents, the Council through its CAR shall immediately inform the
City's authorized representative in writing of such defect.
Page 8
9. The City's authorized representative will inform the CAR in writing when the
City considers the Council Forcemain complete in accordance with the Construction Documents.
Within seven (7) calendar days thereafter, the Council will inform the City in writing of the
Council's determination regarding whether the Council Forcemain as constructed is complete
and whether it does or does not conform to the Construction Documents. The Council will
further inform the City of specific reasons for non-conformance to the Construction Documents
and what steps must be taken by the City to make the Council Forcemain conform to the
Construction Documents.
10. As between the Council and the City, the final decision on conformance of the
Council Forcemain to the Construction Documents will be made by the Council. Evidence of
determination by the Council of the conformance of the Council Forcemain to the Construction
Documents will be in writing by letter from the General Manager of the Council's
Environmental Services Division. The Council will not unreasonably withhold its determination
of conformance of the Council Forcemain to the Construction Documents.
11. During construction of the Council Forcemain, Council shall have the right to
require modifications to the Construction Documents by written notice to the City identifying the
required modifications. The City shall require the City Contractor to make the required
modifications to the Construction Documents. If the Council requests a modification that has an
associated cost or schedule impact under the City Contractor's contract with the City, the City
shall submit the required modification to the City Contractor and solicit a proposal from the City
Contractor identifying the cost and schedule impact associated with making the required
modification. The City shall not order the Contractor to proceed with the modifications until the
Page 9
Council has agreed in writing to the City Contractor's proposal and until the City determines that
the modifications will not adversely impact the City Project, including the City Project schedule.
12. The City shall submit any proposed amendments to or material changes in the
Construction Documents, including the construction schedule, to the Council for review and
approval. Such amendments to the accepted final Construction Documents and/or changes in the
construction schedule must be submitted for approval to the Council's CAR at least three (3)
business days prior to the implementation of such change. The City shall not proceed with
amendment to or changes in the accepted final Construction Documents or construction schedule
until the Council has consented to such change in accordance with Council's procedures and has
approved such change in writing as evidenced by letter to the City from the CAR,provided:
(a) with respect to any proposed amendment or material change to the
Council Forcemain which the City finds in its reasonable judgment is necessary to
avoid imminent personal injury or property damage, the City shall have the right
to proceed with such amendment without written approval from the Council; and,
(b) with respect to any proposed amendment or material change which
the City finds in its reasonable judgment is necessary to avoid delays in the
orderly progress of the Council Forcemain, or avoid defects in the Council
Forcemain, the City shall have the right to proceed with such amendment or
material change if the Council has not responded within 24 hours.
13. During construction, the City shall have the right to require modification to the
Construction Documents. However, such modifications shall not adversely impact the Council
Forcemain schedule and all costs associated with modifications not requested by the Council but
otherwise required by the City shall be borne by the City.
Page 10
V. COSTS AND PAYMENT
1. The Estimated Council Forcemain Design and Construction Costs are shown in
Exhibit C.
2. When the Council has accepted the City's recommended Consultant's
professional engineering services fee and the City's recommended construction contractor and
bid for the Council Forcemain in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the City and
Council agree to substitute, without the requirement of a formal amendment to this Agreement as
long as the Estimated Council Forcemain Design and Construction Cost is not exceeded, a new
Exhibit C showing the actual professional engineering fee, actual Council Forcemain
construction phase costs including construction contractor costs and adjustments of the
contingency, and City contract administration fees for the Council Forcemain in accordance with
the percentages stated in Exhibit C.
3. The Council will reimburse the City in the amounts provided in this Agreement
monthly, within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoices submitted by the City based on the
progress of the Council Forcemain and approval of the invoices by the Council unless the
Council contests the invoice by written notice within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the
invoice. If the Council provides timely notice of contest, the Council sha11 pay all uncontested
amounts and may withhold the contested amount pending resolution of the amount actually due.
4. At the completion of the Council Forcemain, the City shall submit to the Council
the City's Final Cost Statement for the Council Forcemain, invoices showing the Council's final
costs, evidence of payments by the City to the Consultant and City Contractor as of the date of
the Final Cost Statement, and statements of amounts payable to the Consultant and City
Contractor as of that date. The Council shall have thirty (30) calendar days from the receipt of
said invoices to review and pay or contest the amount due. The amount due shall be final,
Page 11
binding and conclusive, and the amount shall be immediately payable, upon expiration of the
aforesaid thirty (30) calendar day examination period unless the Council has contested the
amount pursuant to this paragraph. If the Council provides timely notice of contest of the final
invoices, the Council shall pay all uncontested amounts and may withhold the contested amount
pending resolution of the amount actually due.
5. The City shall administer all contracts associated with the Project in such a way as
to keep separate the costs of the Council Forcemain from the City Project.
6. The City shall not submit any invoice to the Council for Payment until the City
has determined, in the City's reasonable discretion, that the invoice is due and payable for the
Council Forcemain.
VI. RIGHTS OF ENTRY AND PERMITS
1. For purposes of design and construction of the Council Forcemain, the City
(including its employees, consultants and contractors) may enter upon the property or property
interests owned by the Council. For the purposes of design and construction of the Council
Forcemain, the Council (including its employees, Council's consultants and contractors) may
enter upon the property or property interests owned by the City.
2. The City and Council shall assist the Consultant in applying for and obtaining
construction permits and encroachment permits required for construction of the Council
Forcemain.
VII. RECORDS AND DATA
1. All records kept by the Council and the City with respect to the Council
Forcemain shall be subject to examination by the representative of each party hereto.
2. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose
by the activities of the City and the Council pursuant to this Agreement shall be governed by
Page 12
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as amended, and the Minnesota Rules implementing such Act
now in force or hereinafter adopted.
VIII. EMPLOYEES
1. All employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the
performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City
shall not be considered employees of the Council, and any and all claims that may or might arise
under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of
Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any
third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so
engaged, on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the
obligation or responsibility of the Council.
2. All employees of the Council and all other persons engaged by the Council in the
performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the
Council sha11 not be considered employees of the City, and any and a11 claims that may or might
arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the
State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made
by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while
so engaged, on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the
obligation or responsibility of the City.
IX. RESPONSIBILITY AND INDEMNITY
1. Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof
to the extent authorized by the law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and
the results thereof. The Council's maa�imum monetary liability is governed by the provisions of
Page 13
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. The City's maximum monetary liability is governed by the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.
2. The City and the Council each warrant that they are able to comply with the
aforementioned indemnity requirements through a self insurance program and have minimum
coverage consistent with the liability limits contained in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.
3. The City further agees that any contract let by the City for the performance of the
Council Forcemain as provided herein shall include clauses that will require the contractor to:
(a) Defend, indemnify, and save harmless the Council, its officers,
agents and employees from claims, suits, demands, damages, judgments, costs,
interest, expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney fees, witness
fees, and disbursements incurred in defense thereof arising out of or by reason of
the negligence of said contractor, its officers, employees, agents or
subcontractors;
(b) Provide and maintain insurance as required in the contract between
the City and the contractor and to provide the Council, also as required in the
contract between the City and the contractor, with Certificates of Insurance
naming the Council as additional insured;
(c) Be an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the
work provided for in this Agreement.
Page 14
X. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
1. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between parties is contained
herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the
parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement including the
Recitals are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement.
2. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this
Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this
Agreement signed by the parties hereto.
XI. INCORPORATION OF APPLICABLE LAW
Applicable provisions of Minnesota State law, federal law and of any applicable local
ordinances sha11 be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
Specifically, the City agrees to comply with all federal, state and local laws and ordinances
applicable to the City relating to nondiscrimination, affirmative action, public purchases,
contracting employment, including worker's compensation and surety deposits required for
construction contracts.
XII. SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. If any part of this
Agreement is rendered void, invalid or unenforceable, such rendering shall not affect the validity
and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement unless the part or parts which are void,
invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire Agreement
with respect to the parties. One or more waivers by said party of any provision term, condition or
covenant shall not be construed by the other parties as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the
same by other parties.
Page 15
XIII. SUCCESSORS AND A5SIGNS
The covenants of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto, their successors and assigns.
XIV. GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement is entered into in and under the laws of the State of Minnesota and shall
be interpreted in accordance therewith.
XV. NOTICES
Any notice of demand, which may or must be given or made by a party hereto, under the
terms of this Agreement or any statute or ordinance, shall be in writing and shall be sent certified
mail or delivered in person to the other party addressed as follows:
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT SERVICES
William Moore, General Manager
390 Robert St.N.
St. Paul, MN 55101
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Jeannine Clancy, Public Works Director
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Page 16
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
By By
Its Mayor Its Citv Mana�er
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By
Its Re�ional Administrator
17
Exhibit A
Project Location
� � � � ��,d ��� �I` � "'t �`,- ��r� �, `� .�� -
� � , *M � ,. � .. -�. � ��� � �'4 �'>, � �
�� � d � �'�� . .eK . .��r � + s� �I Y` ��� fA
�" �_��, � �, t �f �w 1 , � ',T
, , ... �
� • . -� �,e h n ,�' � � .�' �:+�`y � �b-T e' �..
. _ y�
� •
. . iF � �� i . .4. � � ��; �: �' � ���� ��
, u
�'" .
, �'4f e ��� � �� :..' �=�r ��� � �� !�t..�� �, ,��� " !'►. .,,�*ar'
f�� �� :1 1 . i� ����.►��+ `- F� x" � � ..�.�r� �a , . '�r
A � ��� � � �.�`.� r� ( ' � �� � � t �-3�. - .
a , ► -;� � ��
' ,,; �'' -=*; =' ,�.` ��; �_ .t�f- �',{��=(._��+ ..� ,�.11� ��� �o-��."�� . :
.� . . °' •� _ • „ .
4 � • � �j�� �,�`�y.,� 1f. .�«w'
, � _ � . . 'F�n� �,,,ye<.
r
r � " . ��"
Y .
�,��R� � ���' � f`". " ��, . `ai�.�' + ,{�'#�� . -. `� �.. -�'t
s i_+� .�+.. -�. � .�� ,�. .� . 11 .�..•r V p ..
��� �� I �,s � a •. ..� ' �` �� � +i - �`!
� � �r � ':�
� �; Ri�� �� �,;. '"a. �,,• �y� ,rf � �P „+ �e, � , ( �,,:�_
,� � ..,
_ _ , �.. , _
�.�,.�� . :'a �
.
� ��µ♦. :� .�ki ' � ^�,,��� y� .tn ���� yrR� �'. ��,��.,.�"+�� ��� .
^_R��� M ..6 ia�' '� ���, ��� ���t'�:�� „��'' +rtn �`�y� -
� ��.. . . ».� . '
.�. . �, , �� ,�
_ -- , ,
_... . _. e .� t w sm.
� �, y y/
r�� i�#�r �rA�
.�
_ ._� _... .._�. �!° ��'`r �� ` d�� •i
' ( �F .� �x� Q �,� i� ` �.i¢ ,'� ;•.Y:`_
�� � � -� �.a _ ��`: # � I
E' � �' � � '�'" °,bi � _ + � f+,��.
� ,�; + �i r �. , ' Council Forcemain ' • � ��
t , t'".. �+ �.� ;� � �• '� . , �-°'
�T . : " � �: �,i,►�` i �� _!�_ .
. ,.
� .� "'- � � �: .. ,�; �� ,�_ :r�
_ . ,
� ,
��''� e� �r � ,�.. ,� # ��� � � . �.
- .
'� � F � � • �a�.+, n�a; t .a- �� • �,�.
_
�� T Y n � + w '� ..�..� �� . , µ� `.,� .,., .2"F.r ' + t� �s�� .
,
.� e
� � l " T ,'
i 'r s t.� _ ...; � _ M �* � � � �'.� � , A A .! �.
' �
�.� � ��� ��.. � " `�. , ;� City Project '�";.
� y ,�° � `
.
_�� �.:Y� �k�V��1. _� .��.': . ����*q�•
-
.
T _ � ��-= �," •�. ,� �a'
. �.,
► �4•�
. � • � « �
— r�•„ -� ,� ',' �'1
�. f �' —�� 'a �� � ),�+s,�;,� �
� .r_t_"�. ��� 1 { MI,iy�' � .'�F �
./°� � ����+��� ��* �,.`"`�_`�_ �~•�' i ..
, �` �r ;.���� . J��*•. .
p C. '��-t,. .
• � . .. `�. i � .� .. � '
� �� j� � '�`��I� ��� ��, ���+�� � .
' m� -_ . ' � � 1 #� .J��. �' * � 1y�..+'°��"f�4�'"�����a+�,.
g I � �''! , .'+It �,� ��
J � � � �
. , �,... +tt . •.� «, - ;�+
. • .: ,.
. ,,. _
, r.,,�, � . � r. � .,, '�"����_,�,�� �f
� � -- ;� _ o- ,s �, ,�
_ � .,�,�' ��' �
. . . �, �''
i `�" — p e, . . � �_ " .. . ,;�''` �.,° �r,i"'%'`
y( y `�.Y "��� ''�'T';4 � . ' . � . .._ �` s.J��'.. � �t �J� t� I
1 �� - .w�- �� �,"� 'x,,�i., � M �'
. . � , �� � .. . .
-�f � . .. - �,,. ..,.n��s M� '�f .
i =
a' � -: �`� - � � � + •� �!
-: �. � � ,� �� �
., , , j�
�4 �i: �, r,� �r� �,1''�.E �i �S� ` ►F►,t,bf` �� „�1�1` .� ��! ,1�X"° �� �� ;§"!!'�
� ��F $*, ` ,,�p�� y r�
.�-t f � ,..�_ .i � •ii�x�.i�IR���• a � _ �.. t�����YS`=<,,.�y�',.,.. - -!4 ,„� �, S �,.
t_'� � ti M/FfC4'tf"�.N �� { �.
� f
, ..
• 1� :��__ - . __..
.
. � . ,
�:��. . . r _., . _ e
..�._ .,;. _, • + - '
....„ . ..'._._ . A _ . - - '� . � � . .. — - ...
. . - � ..' . '� '
, . _. �—. _ ,......,, �-
. .-. __..._ ._.. -'�$'n�'
__ .. . � _, ry . —' . 4 „ y
. . _ .. . ` � � �
. l *' _.. . .. , ...
` . � a. • . . __.. �,,..��,._ � " �� a...•»:
_
.o �rr* - .. . . ,... ... - � �y„��m.
� ` �q " �
�,� � �.Er _...� . .. � { [`1�"� �/ f . •
w!' _ _
.i. [`' ", ' t .�rw. � .'�"9 ��..��e�� ,'� . ,!1�.+��' :� ��� }/,� ��..
'�. '��`�'.• Y.rF � . i� �.1� ! � �' K 1 1 R `� .,��j � #+ �,
` �w��� � �- 1.�r7'� �, i ~ �` a (y ! �` .�� �
A�.. �i' � �y 1 . � ��. v _ ., � '�•
�' � :�� � �•��'� � �. �� .�_� ,} � '��i, _ .._
:�, �. �� � . _
`S, ` ,� ;#' ,, ;i� �-, 9' ; , , � ��
F K ` � ��" :►.�'�i \ �!: � � 1,j i -
�' ' ��� - M;: �� t � � �. .. w � �q; T�, �.��
FIGURE 1
Exhibit A
� Council Forcemain ,/�
City Project Location Circle Down Pro'ect ����
� ��i
11HRGSPNASI�ata1CAD1625840J1GIS1GddenVaUe FacPIon1EAWIF eslF ve 2 R�ed Lxatbn Ci 2009 12 18mzd
Exhibit B
Council Scope of Work
�Metropolitan Council
Technical Services Memorandum
DATE: May 5, 2011
TO: City of Golden Valley
FROM: Jeff Schwarz, MCES Project Manager
SUBJECT: 1-GV-461 Relief Lift Station and Force Main Project 805700
Circle Down Forcemain Requirements
As requested during our April 29, 2011 meeting, MCES has prepared the following minimum
requirements for forcemain pipe installation to be incorporated into the Circle Down design by the
City's consultant. A detail showing PVC pipe bedding and trench backfill is attached.
Excavation
• If classified material as defined by MnDOT 2105.2 is encountered in the Pipe Bedding Zone,
CONTRACTOR shall over-excavate as directed by the Engineer.
Fill and Backfill
� If classified soils were not encountered in the Pipe Bedding Zone, Place Bedding Material in 9-
inch lifts to the limits shown on the detail and compact each lift to a minimum 95 percent
Modified Proctor Density as determined by ASTM D1557. Use hand held rammer or vibratory
plate compactors in the Pipe Bedding Zone.
• If classified soils were encountered in the Pipe Bedding Zone and over excavation was directed
by the Engineer, conduct the following Trench Stabilization activities:
1. Line the bottom of the over-excavated trench with Geotextile Fabric.
2. Backfill with 1'/z" minus sorted, washed, crushed rock free of clay balls, debris,
and organic materials meeting MnDOT 3149.2H gradation requirements to the
upper limit of the Pipe Bedding Zone to provide proper pipe bedding and lateral
trench support.
3. Compact crushed rock with excavator bucket.
4. Place Geotextile Fabric over crushed rock before placing Backfill Materials in the
Trench Backfill Zone.
5. If groundwater is present, install trench dams.
• Install tracer wire, #12 AWG type THWN, continuously along the centerline of the Forcemain a
m�imum of two feet above the crown.
• Install marking tape, green Allen Markline or equal, continuously over the centerline of the
Forcemain a minimum of four feet above the crown.
• Install and survey Passive Electronic Markers (PEMs), green 3M Scotchmark Electronic Ball
Marker model 1403-XR or equal, 3 feet below grade at minimum 200-foot spacings along the
pipe alignment and at crossings with other utilities, bends, and valves. Provide an electronic
spreadsheet file containing unique numbered identifiers for each PEM and county system based
survey coordinates.
PVC FORCEMAIN PIPE
• AWWA GC905, ASTM D1784.
� Nominal Pipe Size: 18-inch.
• Dimension Ratio: DR-18.
• Mechanical Joint Restraint: EBAA Iron Series 2000 on every pipe bend. All bolts, tie rods and
hardware shall be stainless steel.
• Minimum 6 feet of cover over pipe crown.
• Joint deflection: Less than 7S%of the maximum allowable.
• Provide thrust restraint at locations where unbalanced forces exist.
• Deflection test by pulling a mandrell through the pipe by hand.
• Pressure test pipe by plugging ends and applying 100 psi pressure for two hours. Test fails if
leakage is observed or if pressure drop exceeds 5 percent of test pressure.
�Metropolitan Council
��: ,
�
� re�c,.�..:,.,..., �r�c Dr,.:o„��,r.,r
.. . .r a�.vvu rr uaci� TiLTJTFpJp�7LZ�'IRIICC�Tir
�i�� ; ��� n�� n oi;o�r;�x e�.,+;,... .,,,a �,.«„o a,r..;., D....;o.,� 4!1 C'7!1!1
V ♦ -fV1 1\
.� �-�1�4�-�,--�P���e6t�i,.g���E� t,.,� ..o�a�t�o �,.17,,..,;,,,�
� e.,..., „ ;r�� i� �•;.,, ,.,o,.�.,.a ,.� �:..,.�o n;...,., a • �. ,+t,o n;,�,�� ,.,,��„t�' ,:
.��...,�..� ....,c.va�-crrcn.�vvvn-ac�r6a-vT�ita� cz-cJ .
�
�—�-�-�1-�'e�e���e{$�nj-�z��;,,n;,.o�cr�n n�`� �., oa ,... n„��;ao n• �
�
` T7�G'1 LIa..�.T D,�1�.,,1e�,� D;,.o .7 �;++;«..A
.... .�.b z ve y va�rnarrPc-aiiarrccra��:
��
��il��-8�6a�-P�-B&�'t�n•i � e .,;s'4. !'3D�iv-vuv��i'zi iiiir`�g
�
�
� � •
�e'S- _
S� •
Exhibit C
Estimated Council Forcemain Costs
000090/480568/1448233_2
EXHIBIT C
COUNCIL PROJECT ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost
Desi n Phase
Contract Desi Engineering $40,000
City Contract Administration $10,000
er A reement 11I031) Total Desi n Phase $50,000
Land Ac uisition Phase
City Obtained Waiver of Trespass $10,000
Total Land Ac uisition Phase $10,000
Construction Costs
Construction Cost $1,400,000
Contingency $140,000
Total Construction Cost $1,540,000
Contract Construction Engineering $110,000
(7%of Construction Costs for
Staking, Inspection, Shop
Drawings, RFIs, Meetings, Record
Drawin s
City Contract Administration(2% $31,000
of Construction Cost
Total Construction Phase $1,681,000
Total Estimated Pro'ect Cost $1,741,000
�
N
N
O
U
c
0
'p y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o in o o v�o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �
�� o000000000000000000000000noocy000000000000000000000000000
FO o0000000000irioo 0000000000rioo��i0000000vivi0000000000000000o H
QU oe»f»�nf»oe»rnaiFSarsrwinen�e�af»f»v�oorAeioornu�sn00PfROf9fAfAfAf9NNOfAp raoe>f»esie»ravsov3u9v►f»ct� c
O f") t0 fA N c0 N W O W c0 N M In �OD� f0 W O O
G � p (rj fA� fA V CO t0 h�07 f� �fA fR f9 C�
� N
Q F- � di _
� W � � ��� � � � � � c
m '
� � v°
O V
V Z �
W
N a t0
W pW� E
0 0 �n o w
� �Q O a � � �� 0� 011�� �nN N ��C � N p �N
� N N C� N�
O
W� �.
�V
C
Q F O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
�y y o 0 0 0 o tn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 o h o o�o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o V
!-O O O O O 1n(V O O�1n O O O O O 1/j O O C O V O O fV O O N�O O O O O O O 1q ip C O O O p C O p O O O O a�O�O O �
�V .O O O in O�V N 07 N N(O �t0 O p N c0 O M V V O O t0 p� 1�f0�1J O a0 O tD O P N fA tfl O�1n(O M o�p O O N O O O N O p
O NNO� C7c0�fAfA�l�7tAtD01�f9f9N NN t0�V a Ol")(O W O? N aDON� O N MODE9f0 W b 00 fhNi�aO U
C f7 lh fA�r fR f9 tA fA tA� t9� �M d3 fA f9 b4 f9 t9 b9 ..
� l�'1'(O O Ih O 1c'1 47 P') O N N7 t0(V N a0 N cV �
Vl O�fA(N� fA E9 � H9 EA a0 M O t9 M EA c� t0 N fA��fA N t9 t9 f9 f9 fA
. W d9 4i � tA Vi ffi Vi vi f9 't
Z W
C U °
W 2 O
U a �
U Oa Z a�D t0(D��j 1nM�h ��N 00(Or. ��ON 00�I�M 010 �ON � !!�O O Oc0 ON 00��n �O O
�Q C °('7f7��M��MN��tO�N `-�010.-TCO�N�Na t0�07��Nafp)MOO��V�N�(O�fO�M•-a-On 7
�1n OD� N N �fp �
W d d
~ �
� U
p �W o000000000000000000000000�noo�n0000000000000000000 000000o y
U ZV 0000�nin00000in0000000000000noon00000000v>v>000000000g000000o y
O O O C7 V iG In 1n O�C'7�N O O p�O O CM N�N a�O C7 f")1n O O O�O O O sl'Il>O O O 1n In In O if1 O O aD O N O�G O
ZO �� OOOfAMf9tAt9N N NfAfAf9 �p N aDOfA� fAfAfAO f9h.-f�.- O�NMfA�N i sT�V fA� di0 f�ON O� LL
a OO�N� tA fA f9 H9�fA f9 fA O H9 N� E9 fA Y!N N fA(A fA�fA fA fA fA f9 O E9 l�fA�fA
F d' d9 fA �N t9 tl9 V3 � V! di �
U � �
V� � �
�� F W W S 2 S =2= 2 2 S S S 2 S S m �`
��ZO Z J d'�J J(A(}/If}/I Q Q Q JJ J JJQ QU J V}I(/IUJU(/I�Q O aOOOO�UUQfLL/�(LL/7 JJ��}1I(LL/�Q QJ JJ VIJ UI W W W� O
mac> > F-�- www wwug �°�'����� ugu�w urw � �
J J
w o 0 3
0
U U c
O �` V 3
W Z Z �
Q U � �
� Q Z �
N a w �
W vi o ¢ o
J �.J � (� �� �
O �a �m�a °°°° W Z�? m
aw ww� �� � �ot� O
a �' w0 �} �pmj�U' mm 0 F-W W W a
�J ~ �Z Z Z U � W J �
� k ��c9ZC� io � �pp p����Z c9c?�� aa¢a v �
y �� z ogo c� � ¢ v�u> a a
W � � ?c7— �� ¢ a � �F� �H wwZZ ac)VUrn W
� � ZF� F-U' pV' � �z � 0=m VX�y W w tn00�� yV)ptn� � E
� ° Wz zwwWwO �w � �'na ag����� a��ww o��ZZ> w �
� Qz �W a a J � ?a � � o�W� � W¢¢ xZJga �
�hw�w w aww >3x,n ww
— m—YWg c9��wa a a> Z> c��o Qa' �aau> ogY �` �
(�J�W W W�Q¢Q= U— W O U�0 2� J U J
� Q> NY U tA Wda QWa�a<nu_ X p�7 t4a�y YY U
oa >ac� V aN � »c7�>> }>w � U
� � �o�g o wc7c� �_v c�c� wzzz i�
w aa w�aa Nrno acn � � � aaz 0—
c�W3yac��¢av>o°oz Na�w�Z m3 avv?NO�- m aoo Q�ao��� c7c7c9
waw�wwa�w�zZZa wc9p>��U��U�C7C7a0�� >YY¢¢WWaa00000��WOOW
t-a�p� z�� � x � a
wvwZw FZWag g zaw¢� ZWWZZWZWWXJJJ »wawwwww ui wwLL
UNU�U W 4''?yYYm �>mg—�~-- U' OQQQmm����(7U' C7U' C7���U' U' U
qa v ga�Y�Qa�aa¢��3�Qam>33��aooNaaaa¢►-Waaaw
Z '. Z O Z�Z Z W U�V U J Z Z�7 U�V LL Z W m 2 Q Q Z>>Z m W W W�_�J � Z Z
� OZO�O�F�pI_���QC�C�¢~�OXW WWfnWWO�J �FH UVI-�OOJJ�JJZQI'�JJN
��c��g�m��ncnx �mm��nu� mmmw�a�3��33zma��aw�i wwwwmaaaaa�aw¢a
Q c�m Z a vi � cncncnrnmv wmv��n
Z Z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Z �N��d'��">d' �V���W W��F J Z� Q
N—m»»)»>U� U� C9C9C9C9C7C7�C9C�C7O�FF-W?J�JJJhhI--UU�a.UUQaJ�JJJV�FJJ
mamOOOOOOOO??>;j>j�Ojj��F-WW��WaWaWpW�a»>OOVVOOZ�aaaaaLLN�a4�
� O��wwwwwwwwa¢aa¢aaaw¢aaoww���}}a}y�oo�UVOOVV����N����+���i
W �UU' �RK����K Wtnt�(qtqtA(Aa>Ktntq<pUC7 V1V1QmF-FFI-?QQQvioUU�ci�I-LLZZ222FLLLL??tq
� Nf� ch�In����(n M Mf�1 cYCOaD V Of O N N �QONNN h P aDNNC�C]P7 c0 C�NN N
~ O O O O O O O O p N N N N N N O p O O O O O O O O p p O O O O O p O O O O O O O C7 C�p O O
�2O N ��N 1f11nN1ntn��lnK7�1n1nN�1�Nt0(OtOf01nf0(D(01nuJ�t�� if7�OtOfOfO���[f1n1� �(Of0(O(O(O�Of0001n1ntOf0(O
F2 ��a�«st sT�t a�V st V V sf R<R V'N In�fh�h O O O O�-st V� O O O C O O fh R<�7 V'
� Q N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N K)f0(O�p f0 p O O N N l'7 M CO lY7 M V� f0 t0�O<O(O f�
O N M f7 f'7 t'7 M V 1[J 1n 1n 1(�In In 1n�[1 tn In In������LL7 1C1�fJ 1n In
Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
�
W C� Oe-Nfha'�tOh CO�O Nfhsl'1n(Of�aD Wp N C7 1nfOf�pp�O N (ha�<Of�aD�O Nf�1�f��p �
Z W '-NMStN(OI�aO W� �NNNNNNNNNN MMM M�MMM(hch0�c� ��y������1nLL71n1n1n a
J N m
v
ci
N
O
N
�
a
�
N
N
O
U
c
0
p F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �
W(p O O O O O O O O O O O O� 1n
H�OOC O�0000 O(C t0 c0 N �W
�()fA fA�fA�fA fA H9 f9 f�0� N I� � O
O
Q � � N� rcOi r`ri � V
� w �ss ci3 i» c
� �
y j U
� U p
U Z m
W
a' �p E
7 �Z N O N
W
f. �Q C � N
�
W� a
.�
p F-O O O O O O O O O O O o p O O o O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O o �
W(p O O O O O O O�O O N N aD O O O O O O O O O O O O O� � O O O O O O U
F-Q O O O O�O�I�In N W .I� Of C O O O O O O C O O p O N N O O O O O O �
Q V OOOtON Of�M N �1� P(O C7 tA i9 E9 p000 01n 1n�p O 00 O N �l1
� OCOlO W f��V:N f�N ON c'� N�O� iL1� V'c0 lh O OR V OD N U
O�� ��N� � N'Q 1�O� tG a{!�!n fV O�Ih f7 O �V a V O� f`')O '7 �
F fA �M N b9 d9 � W V 'Q fA M Hf N lh �t� � �N N aD O
W � � H� � EA fA fA � � uN9 � � L
z W
� V o
rn
.W.� W U
c� a n n n n n n n u n n n n u n n n n n n n ii �
(Y O p J Y }F 1- J� �-1- 1- J Y T F- F- J� }!- F Y
QU VU �q QU f)U M QV VU (A QC> UU �q
V IW-� p �2 2 W O �"2 Z W O �2 Z W O o F'Z Z W O S
aZ.000�opa��� OW WO-' U OW WG.' U oo��OO OW W0.' V p OW W0.' U �
�aMN p���the- mC7 C7Q 1� mC7 U� Q K �N N� mC7 C7Q Z mU� U` Q Q,' �
F� c0 �2 ZZ W �Z ZZ W �Z Z2 Q c�i �2 ZZ W
W d yF F— W yF F— 3 (f7� F— IA� �— c
W Z Z 3° a' 2 Z e W Z 2 e � Z Z e d
I-�- ijp pa ~ �O O� m ZO O� � � O'� uJ �
� W� �+ N W� �; � a� �+ � W� �+ �- �
p F-w o 0 0 0�o 0 0 0 �� + 0 � + o 0 0 0 � + 0 3
0000n,o��no w we � o00o a° a o we * � N
C) Z V �O J �- O J �O J O J Q N
O f7 O tV V O N N 1n (�r ��- 0 �O O N � O y� F
Z �K OfA0E9f9�(fl�� a Q Q F- fA0 O N W� a � a
� d M O .fA MfA + � � �+ � Vl MNdi �+ ~ � �+ H Z LL'
F f9 � � F O � 0 fA fA Q 0 � � Q � Q N
y E
F-> > W (~p � ~ � � 2 � � a>
U K (A J Iq a M W �
W~ r W � � K � Z VFi y K 4 Z'
V OZ W LLu�I�YZLL>-l� W O W y I�UUu. Q W � W�j �. R
F-p.'O �Q.'JJ J(A OJfn J � f � W JQ Q-� � J J i �- C.
maU � � i++ � ww � Fa, u+ m
=JJ �!1 � r W � y W �
wzz � o a ~ � a y
00 � ~ 3 � O o
U U � a � °c_
'� N 3
o �
a Q
� U
H �
W �
O
J
f0
Z ip
a Z w U n
� U U
J ~ �
4! W fA Q R L
W�
� Oy=O V} W j L�
X a U ai
a Z �
F �a�3w�ww W a i�
� Z �pp �
o a�0 3�o�� �o c�n Y Q
W WOZQ,�W�=
V�Zt~i�¢W�a�W WQOW W
r �aH� U
ai�V Wr~�Q-� ''5��� O
tq�Z Z��Z�O W N O W LL
¢pow?=g=o maa
wav��-oc> c� o��a j
W�O F�J�J!7 ��o o a
�w��O�aS�. UUU -
FH Wfqfn�lL�N � �
NO'J N��(h V'N �
O O O O O O p p O O O O O
r2 t0 f0�1n�tn(O(O In �fD t0 tD f0
W O 'Nf`MChlnlf�lnlnN 'aa�V ' C7
�Zr�nnnnnr�r�ao . °�i�i�i �i
— �n�n�n�v�in u�in�n
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Jif N�<O10��c�0� �a�D a�00�i � Q
�
a
�
N
O
N
�
a
N
�
O
U
c
0
W y o°o °o°o 0 0 °o g 2
�V e°9°e� e�i° °vi° °o °o c
0 0 0
� y � � �
� W U
y � `o
U
�
V W E
� pc� w
� Q� m
� �Z S
r- �� a
W� c
�
O
U
p F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w ao 0 0 0 0 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W fA o 0 o O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n n� aD N o 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 o V
F O O O O C o O O O � C�a 0 o O O G R 1 n o O o O C O 1 N O 1�� m 1 n f�C C C G 1 n C O O C V C p O .-.
�() OfA 00 00 O O [7aDM 000(0�000000 f�O �� �� W W N ON ON O�OOCO0000 �
O O f0 t0 W O in N h f9� a0 W N P N CD O�O a0 f7 O)f`') M�i(1 � N fh C� N N O N/h M t0 O)N
E9 f9 � t/i Vi Vl H!�.,(A Vi tfJ�Vi i9 X
� c0 t0 M 01� aD f� �q a N fh'R 1f1 (O f7 ch t0 O h h N N N
� � � � N� � d9�9 E9 fA N�Vi Vi V3 Vi EA�di V) � �r- � fA (y (y f/i H'> W
Z W O
H
�
G U (�j
�
J W �
p a n n u u n n n n n n n Y
K op �r >1- � � �� >F- F _°o
V W� �C) U U 2 V1 <U U U �p �
Qf- °o OW W� ~ U v oonr� OW W� U �
Z �p O f' _ ��N I��00 Nfh�N�1[I Nc0�� F' �N a-��fhN NNN�000
�a ni mZ ZZ C9 W �NNr'd'm�n�� mZ ZZ �K �"� r�r�,� a�i
V1> >1= F— J W� �F �— c
W� F"O O� C� i' oCZ Zu+ W U
F W U U} W ❑ W V U+ � d
� ZV o°o, �� + C7 w °oi°n°o°o,°o,og°o,o°OO,°o,°o,°o°o,°o,°o°o, W� + � �°n°oo°o,°o°o°oog°oo°o,°o,°o LL
0 �� CO (p� Q Z f' 1�Natp 1l7 cOaO N�00000 N O y� J � a01nON O�O�L'J Opp ON N y
U N } W� a fHyliry(hNE9N/hM pOOO�PO a F fA1�0 Of�ON�tnf'�h MfA
Z . a t9 tH � � � fA f9 f9 f9 fA�Of O �aD d'f� �+ � (A lh fA N fR N f9 N9 f9 C
p � w F ds._��sv�usus K O � i»vi i»iR�i `m
F m v w vs v� o m �y u> ua �
U U�' y x � N 7N Q �
O� oC ~ LL l L W O LL Y}Z Z LL LL 1 L LL LL U U U U U U U W (A LL U U Z U U U U U U LL 1 L�-m a
O.'� Vi Z J J W F J f/1 U I��J J J J J Q Q Q Q Q Q a � W J Q Q�Q Q Q Q QQ J J N J �
a p'�� � 1�- ~~ W W W W W W W W J W W~W W W W W lL �
�V a y y Q
Z� o � O �O
�V ° O F' �
�LL� � 3
o �
W y
Q �
� Z �
W � U
F � J
a Q N �
W �
2 ap cp W�j W n
a °°r° J www� o- o d
V (JC9 F DO�� W
y y� ZZ wwwy� Z ¢ E
RQ:Q:W WW Q V �
� oo �n�o»==_v�c~ia�� x � � � �
��
W W W W >>>Z J O W W �N Z
r a>>W J�J J J J J�
— �� aww¢m�UUUUF���aOZ W00 � a,N'nOO�. U
00 W����?��°r°�iC�'Jt�')U�' �mcN7V Za �oH �VUi»
zz 3UC���qau�viv�v>aaaz�zW ur zm�n zway
a¢ W--c�oowwwwzzz�w�F- a3� �ogt�Faaz?
mm �mma�`w0000---Ny�X� �>z Zpzamzu�aZWk
�� �a a K Y a���K����a uJ a � Y o�X z p Z LL .
» �ILLLW VaW W W W��O Ww w zW0
UU O �O C7 F- �FO(��S�Z_ ��wZ
F-J J J Q'U����H F H 0 Z 0 W a Q�z�W�a a o_W o
�� �--FLL >wwwwc�c>c> � 3�xo YacnaE-w���
ww w�X wwamcnrnrn���c~.�v~ic~.�? w�J = �u�
�� �W W fA S H F F W Q W O 1>W p J Q 7 I-H W J—
LLaaaa c�w��wZZV�c,�y�
� zz �00¢�a����zzzzUZ� ��Jw�Xa��Z�°�~
w00 www0�_ �„���00o0^�O— ww a���°>�oo- a�
Wc�c� �c�c�c�c��o��NNUUUUILU� ��aia?LLmxxc>iorvo
� Ya0101 �.-��NNNNfOCV O �M�NNNNNNM('�V OD
N O O O O O O O O O O p O M O O N p p ppp���p�p
�O 1�1n 1�tD<O<O t0�LL�u'/�In 1n 1f1 1A i0 in�O In 1lI 1n K1 f0 t0 t0 t0 CO f0 f0
F�2 ( 'sf 1n� N fh M 17f7f0t0�p fG�O�DM '�O sf V'�st sf a`7�7<sl'
� Q C'1 � O O O N 1n O p p O O O O O O O 1� O O�in O O O O O p O p O O
�tn <V In.In 1�t�LLY�1i ff1 1�In In�lA V IA In in In In!n!n In lf�In
`l N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
�
?W C� O tOf�c0�0 Nchd'�(Of�aD�O N C��tOhaO� �f7PaD�0 �
W vv m�o�om��i.i.r�nni.n�mmm aoaorommao�irn�irnrnrnrn° ¢
(/) M
N
O
N
O
N
�
�
a
�
�
0
U
c
0
w°� 2
Q V �
� o
a � �,
K W U
� � o
a� �
U
v z �
W
K Q G y W
� a� �
� ga a
F�
W Q c
�
O
U
p!-o�[7 1n O� a o O o 0 o O o 0 o O o 0 o O O o� � p �
W(q�t0 e-N d� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N 1n h p U
HO�Ep � �p Op N01flOO�C 0000 N N O aD N ...
�(�(O W c+DP 1n �O O NOODIn00000 NC� u)aD V � �
�N N 10 aD `7 Nt9N N t0�W aptn0 MN u7 M � �
� N� �O') f� � �� �V N f�1n N N N N f�` � L
tn i» i» vi in f» i�i u>vi a v3 E»vs u�u9 �n � x
� � � � �
Z W
� F o
O � o
C U �
J W �
R' O J} }H F 11 II 11 II 11 �� Y
��QU C�U VJ 4U VU �~A �
U aF-OW WK (� O O> OW W� V � �
�Q mZ ZD Z e-NMN��N��N oJ.-f mC7 U� G a' C� N
Z W �
W��2 2e � y2 Z2° 3 0
Z� �� W W �+ � N
� �w�� ++ �' o000000000000 3V + °7
� a o 0 o O O O O O O o O O O W� � IL
2 V�o J
� �ar W Q � O O d'1n h O O O G C In O O M o J F �
U } ��M'-N O� C70N Op a
a F� h G �'- fA fA N fA�fA�.P In 1n �+ � Z E
Z Q 0 W Vi Yi t9 !9 EA N f9 Q � Q 07
� � LO Q Vi f!) f, fn C
W 7 c y � Q fq W m
aZ � � � a Q W V}7��U W JJ J UUU N W S E
� ��u� 3 � d
H
�� a W O y W �
Z E < ~ a Q �O
oVo 3 ~ � �
vLL� Z � �
o a �
F �' �
� Q
� �
� �
w �
J
O
f0
�W p
O �a g
a �,.�W w �
� Mo3 0
y z :W N E
w 0 ��}
o �� xF� �
W Jll�,l� �O ZjH =
= O�W m~ c��l W�Z V
.Z�U� FO J� Ztntq
Q 0 �� �� �J�
� W Z
2
>a�?OZ Q W C9>=F-
¢Z m�y a �3?V Z tn
F-FIai WU�Iu F W Jaty�W �
2�Wm0�>jNW�F,,,O
(aqUJ��Q��W aZU�"
»��=��za��=w
00�--zv��aojWUV�iz
wwwga�axw°�wasoo
��C9t7Ucpao�"v�nLLUU
>
m OJ'p7 W�NN Mfp70 tONN
� ���O f�0(�O(�O(�Ot�OtO�1L)f�0(�O
Fi a�i.-�rioiririacd�d�c
_ � �oown0000W��o
N N N N N N N N N a N N N
N
W NM�In(Of�ODmN�O� �
Z O O O O O O O O O� Q
J M
N
O
N
O
N
�
N
�
�
��
January 5,2012 RE: City of Golden Valley,Minnesota
2012 PMP Construction Services
SEH No. 110544, 115792, 116899
City No. 12-01, 12-02
Ms. Jeannine Clancy
Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley,MN 55427-4588
Dear Jeannine:
Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City of Golden Valley to provide professional engineering
services to the City of Golden Valley for the 2012 Pavement Management Program(PMP)
construction season. This letter serves as the supplemental Letter Agreement in accordance with the
Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Golden Valley and SEH.
Background
The City of Golden Valley has completed the design and intends to reconstruct their 2012 Pavement
Management Program(PMP). The proposed 2012 PMP improvements include three distinct project
areas, likely completed in the following order,however with some overlapping of schedules:
1. Circle Down and Turners Crossroad
2. Welcome Avenue and King Hill Neighborhood Streets
3. Harold Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue
Each project includes construction of storm sewer pipe,drainage structures, sanitary sewer repairs,
and isolated water main improvements. All of the streets will be reconstructed including concrete
curb and gutter. 'The work on Circle Down includes an 18 inch diameter force main which is a part of
MCES' larger 1-GV-461 Lift Station and Force main project.Metropolitan Council is entering into
an agreement with the City to have SEH provide construction services for construction of the force
main in conjunction with the City's 2012 PMP. Harold Avenue is part of the City's Municipal State
Aid System.
The City will be providing overall construction administration of this project. SEH prepared the
plans and will be providing construction staking services, a full time Resident Project Representative
(RPR),construction observation services, and record plan services as described below and detailed in
the task summary.
Scope of Work
Construction Staking
SEH will provide a survey crew to provide the construction staking of the proposed improvements
for the neighborhood streets included in the 2012 program. Staking tasks for this project will include
placement of horizontal and vertical control, sanitary sewer stakes,water main stakes, centerline
access road stakes, curb and gutter stakes,blue tops after curb is in place,utility staking for private
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.�3535 Vadnais Center Drive�Saint Paul MN 55110-5196
SEH is an equal opportunity employer � www.sehinc.com � 651.490.2000 � 800.325.2055 � 651.490.2150 fax
Ms. Jeannine Clancy—2012 PMP Construction Services
January 5, 2012
Page 2
utility companies, and sidewalk stakes. In addition,time has been included to provide full time
survey as-built observation"as needed"during the force main installation.All survey coordination
for construction staking and observation will be between the survey crew chief and the City.
Resident Project Representative(RPR)
The on-site representative for Resident Project Representative(RPR)is the Engineer's agent at the
site and will act as directed by and under supervision of the Engineer. The RPR shall serve as the
liaison with the contractor, working principally through the contractor's superintendent. They will
assist in helping the contractor understand the intent of the Contract Docuxnents. The field personnel
will review the progress schedule, shop drawings, and required submittals, Schedule of Materials
Control and consult with the Engineer concerning acceptability. The RPR will be responsible for
maintaining job site files, for correspondence,meeting reports, field orders,and supplemental
agreements. They will keep a daily diary or log book. Records pertaining to quantities and
applications for payment will be the responsibility of the RPR. The RPR will also keep information
pertaining to record plans and will schedule the survey crew based on the staking requests from the
contractor's representative.
Observation
SEH will provide observation services including attendance of the pre-construction meeting and shop
drawing review on drainage structures for all three project areas.A budget has been included for each
project area for minor technical support if needed for geotechnical or traffic control issues that may
arise.Time has also been included to assist with project closeout activities.
On Harold Avenue,because of the potential for contamination adjacent to Lion's Park,we have
included time for an environmental scientist to coordinate potential disposal with the land fill and
time(3 days) for an environmental technician to be on-site to screen the soils as they are excavated.
Work that may include additional analytical testing or time beyond this initial screening will be
considered extra work and addressed separately if necessary. We have also included two field visits
for the landscape architect to work with the tree planting contractor and residents for the planting
proposed on Harold Avenue in front of the Vallee D'OR townhome complex.
Record Plan Services
SEH will perform a record survey of all project areas,which includes providing final top of structure
and invert surveys on new sewer structures. Benchmarks will be reestablished in the construction
areas in conjunction with the record survey.
In addition, SEH will obtain record drawing information and complete the record drawing plans for
the force main portion of the work according to the City's Standards. The City will complete the
record drawings for the remauung streets.
Project Team
Daniel Erickson will manage coordination as required between city staff and the surveying and will
provide administration of our contract with the City. He will also be available to answer design
related questions and will attend the weekly project construction meetings as necessary. Greg Tvedt
will be the lead Survey Crew Chief assigned. Mike Kotila will be available to provide traffic
engineering support as necessary. Brent Theroux wi11 be available to provide geotechnical field
support as may be required with the force main installation and subgrade correction work.A1
Ms. Jeannine Clancy—2012 PMP Construction Services
January 5,2012
Page 3
Sunderman will coordinate the environmental soil screening wark and provide the coordination with
the landfill.
Schedule
We anticipate the majority of construction services to take place within the months of May to
November. The record plan survey will follow completion of the construction.
Compensation
SEH proposes to be compensated for the scope of work proposed in the Agreement on an hourly
basis. Compensation will be based on the hourly cost of personnel plus reimbursable expenses,
including reproductions,mileage, car allowance,and equipment.Additional services required beyond `
the tasks and estimated hours as described can be negotiated or provided as extra work on an hourly
basis. We have estimated these costs to be:
1. Circle Down and Turners Crossroad $ 107,600
2. Welcome Avenue and King Hill Neighborhood Streets $ 65,400
3. Harold Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue 78 700
Tota12012 PMP Construction Services $ 251,700
The City of Golden Valley will be invoiced for actual labor and reimbursable expenses incurred by
SEH to complete the work. The person/hour task budgets for each phase of the work are attached.
This agreement is an understanding of the project to date. If this document satisfactorily sets forth
your understanding of our agreement,please sign in the space below and return one copy to our
office. We look forward to working with you,your staff, and the community on this project. Thank
you for the opportunity to continue to work with the City of Golden Valley.
Respectively submitted,
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
�l�'��A�-L-" �v
�
Susan M.Mason,PE Daniel P.Erickson,PE
Principal Project Manager
amc
Enclosures
s:�ij�g\goldvV 10544\1-genl\]0-wntracts\j.clancy const service 2012 pmp.docx �
Approved this day of , 2011
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
By:
Title:
F rn N N N�O N V m O �
U
t .
� '
N • �
a .N
v,�
i� .:.
�
8 '
'e •
�c«,n� °a ',\°o
v
� '
� ,e
'�
Ci �
a
� a
C �
F L
m�o o a o .�,o 0
�b O N .l�
ib m
y�j u
� � a�
g � ,o'
9 0
E � ,�
� OI � �•� r � C �
'� «r
� � � �� "�
F h
� � � �
c �
� W i si
o �! y
e y 3^�,� c
° ° �e 3
.' � « ��
y y » °a
a � F � � ���
; � o o $ � « 3
� � � � x
o g 2 a � � p � L
� s ° _
` U � � �o " "�"�"� 6a c�8
o�, u dp� � a c' s ° W�-'�� � �''� o x Q �s �a
c �3 � C� y V C � C' � °' � `' { °�,W � `�°^ o L,;
p L �j� O{c �Y C ••e• �p� '�'��
3 • O � � � r S }-o p C J � � L� �•Y �I � { �p C Q,� �j �j �
F 9 y � � y �i ] �
v �•FR V 'O.0 � �.�• � fj }"" �y p+ .� �' p g �j � ^'� r e�p �p�
c . ' 'L .g d o � 0 2 � o � '=��o E B 7 i.,� m a, � S h,�.9
', x�v,ww ��n �x>(n3v�UC�W 5rn' �v�o4 ` u� i .� e c ' �
C � �•O in U OL _•� $ �'�"m � 'C`�2 '�'�
� ' '� �` g �' � �'�
N N e� e�' . O � � ` �C � Q � �
. F W t= Dm Vm�
i <C�O O nf b O O N
U
Ye
%
.p p
�
< •
�e
a
^o 0 0
N
�
z
�
�
ci 3
v . Q `o
C �
w` �
C �
F �
�n�D O N O
�, N O
� �
�
� z 3
� '� 4
: � ° • ° ?
� o
�e '� c
N a � �
v ,� g �
t � � ° � �� $ �
� � � �
� e 3
C 'j V
� � U
Z VJ Y �
� C � �
�C 'C ��
z 2 m v
° �
° x �
� � m 3 � ti�
; ° F �
m � � 3
r � �
� � g 8 �° �
8 d ��
u
3` ' � - �
u � s � ' � �
` � � �.Y '� � � e a�
C ;e e, 0 2�
�� � sg_� �'�` `� � �'� . a �°W s 'S a
� � C3 � $ a o o � g, r' " s �'. �' u
� �'� `u $ V ° y ° � ° � °' �i� ` ' �£
l .�L C 9 y m 'i' �p W� � � ttl Q � •� v i 0'S O R� y G4.,�.�
> p p ry CW e q
C °� L O.0 V � L� � Y 0.f � Q > >'L Q Z � ` ��' 4 p 9 t �
4 .'. g�rnw a �x>Um3mc+w� ,em°ae ,$ `Y �' 3 e.6
� . O V pG ' � � �'k,"y � �j��i,�
a .: � �� e
� ' ����
N a � � '.H° ��W� t.° arn'ci� �
N N o0 V N OO O O O oD ' O
B �.N.-.
�
U
L
�
:� ;�
�
<
H � N
��
a
s c�
a
w
�o .,c
�
E z
��
�
� �
3�
.,�c . °o
v
�
L
'�
�
¢ Y
V �
O •�y r
p� '�
0
� L
M V N pp O
� �O
� �y
� z 5
6
C • O ' � �
S 5 �
0
� � u
a � �
� � , e N o
0
= � '� � s �3� ^ �
l� H
� _ �
z
' � u
Q e
� � "o
' ~ a
m` a
°1 e �
c .� O �
� � a
a �o
a � � � � vs
d S F x
`Y y C � q O
' � � x�
�
� � � w fi � � �
' � `s � q �S � � a �v
�d g-� �—g_�� �,��� „ �'s � m
C � � u VE1 � F O � � �' �� E ~ y �� C ? � �
� � ,�\u V .6 � f� � �r
C'� � "'� g¢ `�•4 W h ep�,
i "t e `� � d •a° °g°'d % � � g� �"� q �o � �'� a � d����`
� o�'` 2'f �'� � �'� �u� Z $ o �° � o o m
d _' �LC fsiJ Vr 0. �y L � C «v '� 4'Z �aTi � C,u
r�i 7 U N 3 V�i U�p��.�1. N p VJ{Il ti Y
4 ':O U' w�' .�� �° ��vi : U t'�
e� i Y..Q �� �
^' a e� � . F �,klo- t` .GV�U�
�� �� � m .
r�� � �,
d �„� „ �.
O � � e Public Works
763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. I. Master Agreements for 2012 PMP Sanitary Sewer Repair Program
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Mitch Hoeft, E1T, Engineer
Summary
The City's Pavement Management Program (PMP) includes a voluntary program to allow
residents in the project area to rehabilitate their sanitary sewer service, with the goal of
becoming compliant with the Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance. This program allows property
owners to obtain competitive bids from pre-approved contractors, and provides the property
owners the opportunity to have the costs of sewer rehabilitation specially assessed against
the property if they choose.
The prequalification process for private sewer service repair contractors incfuded the ability to
perform excavation and/or liner repairs, the contractor's history of performing service repairs
in Golden Valley, the availability of equipment, and financial resources. Based upon the
criteria, the following four private sanitary sewer service repair contractors have qualified for
this program:
• Gene's Water and Sewer
• Highview Plumbing
• Minneapolis Suburban Sewer and Water
• Ouverson Sewer and Water
Each of these contractors is required to enter into a Master Agreement with the City of
Golden Valley to perform private repairs as part of the PMP program. The contractors will be
responsible for contacting each of the residents in the PMP who are interested in having their
repair costs specially assessed, and providing them with estimates for the repair. When
property owners have selected a contractor for their repairs, a three-party agreement
between the City, property owner, and private contractor is signed by all parties. Following
completion of the repairs, the property owner may opt to have the costs specially assessed to
the property.
Attachments
Master Agreements for Sanitary Sewer Service Repair between the City of Golden Valley and
Gene's Water & Sewer, Highview Plumbing, Minneapolis Suburban Sewer &Water, and
Ouverson Sewer & Water (16 pages)
Sample Private Sanitary Sewer Service Work Order agreement between the homeowner,
City, and contractor for 2012 sanitary sewer repair (3 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize entering into Master Agreements for the 2012 PMP Sanitary Sewer
Repair Program with the following companies:
1. Gene's Water and Sewer
2. Highview Plumbing
3. Minneapolis Suburban Sewer and Water
4. Ouverson Sewer and Water
CONTRACT NO. 12-1 A
MASTER AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND
GENES WATER &SEWER
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE REPAIR
THIS MASTER AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made this 3�`�"day of
_ .��'� , 2012, by and between the City of Golden Valtey, a municipal
corporation ("City"), and Gene's Water & Sewer ("Contractor"), under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
WHEREAS, City operates a voluntary sanitary sewer inflow and infiltration ("I &
I") program along with its Pavement Management Program each year;
WHEREAS, in 2012 the Pavement Management Program will result in the
reconstruction of several miles of City streets along with the sewer and other utilities
within the street rights-of-way within the following roadways:
Circle Down (Turners Crossroad to T.H. 100), Turners Crossroad (Circle
Down to 1394), Harold Avenue (Winnetka Ave to Glenwood Ave), Rhode
Island North (Harold Ave to T.H. 55), King Creek Road, King Hill Road,
Phoenix Street, Welcome Avenue North, Welcome Circle.
WHEREAS, a homeowner residing within the above-described boundaries and
availing themselves of the voluntary I & I program may wish to repair their lateral sewer
line or related items in connection with their sanitary sewer system;
WHEREAS, this Agreement, Special Provisions and General Conditions attached
hereto as Exhibit A and made a part of this Agreement, provide certain terms and
conditions for: (i) special assessment of an owner's real property for repairs necessary
to bring property in compfiance with the City's I & I ordinance; and (ii) payment by the
City for the performance by certain pre-qualified private contractors in making
necessary repairs, replacements or reconstructions of private sanitary sewer service
lines generally from residences to the sanitary sewer main line in the street right-of-way.
WHEREAS, a Private Sanitary Sewer Service Work Order ("Work Order"), a form
of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, shall be executed by Contractor, City and the
property owner and shall incorporate via reference the terms and conditions of this
Agreement including without limitation the Special Provisions. Once a residential
property owner selects the contractor from the City's list of pre-qualified contractors to
make such repairs to the owner's sanitary sewer service line, the owner and the
Contractor shall agree on the Work Order and it will be attached to this Agreement and
made a part hereof with respect to the Properry named in the Work Order to form the
entire Agreement affecting the City, Contractor, and property owner and the Work
(defined below) on the Property identified.
WHEREAS, the Work covered by the Work Order shall be completed by the
Contractor in a timely and professional manner and in accordance with all applicable
laws and regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between City and Contractor that each
2012 I & I related project to be specially assessed which is undertaken by Contractor
shall be subject to the following terms and conditions including without limitation the
Special Provisions and the terms of any applicable Work Order between Contractor,
City, and the owner of the subject properry:
ARTICLE 1. The Contractor hereby covenants and agrees to furnish all materials, all
necessary tools and equipment, and to do and perform all the work and labor necessary
to complete the work in accordance with this Agreement, the Special Provisions,
Standard Details attached hereto as Exhibit C, and any applicable Work Order.
The Plans and Specifications, the proposal of tMe Contractor (the "Proposal") and the
Contractor's bond, the Work Order and the Special Provisions, together with this
Agreement, shall together constitute the entire Agreement between the parties as if set
forth herein.
ARTICLE 2. The Contractor agrees to commence said Work and conclude the same in
accordance with the Proposal heretofore filed with the City and in accordance with the
Work Order executed by the City, Contractor, and the subject property owner, including
without limitation the Bid Price as set forth in the Work Order and in accordance with the
time schedule for commencement and completion of the Work set forth in the Special
Provisions, time being of the essence in this Agreement, and to complete said Work in
every respect to the satisfaction and approval of the City and the property owner.
ARTICLE 3. The Contractor further agrees to make, execute, and deliver to the City,
corporate surety bonds, or letter of credit, approved by the City Attorney in the minimum
sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) which are hereby incorporated into this
Agreement for the use of said City and of all persons doing Work or furnishing skill,
tools, machinery or materials under or for the purpose of this Agreement, to secure the
faithful performance and payment under this Agreement by�aid Contractor and to be
conditioned as required by law for work undertaken in 2012 in connection with the 2012
PMP. The Contractor also agrees that any time the value of the work performed under
this contract exceeds the $25,000 contract limit, the City shall have the option to modify
this contract and adjusted upwards in $25,000 increments and the Contractor shall
provide new corporate surety bonds, or letter of credit, approved by the City Attorney, in
the amount that the contract has been increased and neither this original Agreement nor
the upwardly adjusted agreements shall become effective unless and unfil said bonds
have been approved by the City Attorney.
ARTICLE 4. In consideration of the covenants and agreements stated above, the City
agrees to pay the Contractor as set forth in Section 12 of the Special Provisions.
ARTICLE 5. It is understood and agreed by the Contractor that the City, through its
authorized agents and the property owner shall be the sole and final judges of the
fitness of the work and its acceptability, and no payment shall be made to the
Contractor hereunder until the work shall have been found acceptable by the City
through its authorized agents and the property owner.
ARTICLE 6. It is understood and agreed by the Contractor that, with respsct to all work,
the Contractor will keep as complete, exact, and accurate an account of the labor and
materials used as is possible, and in submitting the final statement will itemize and
allocate the costs of said work.
ARTICLE 7. All payments to the Contractor shall be made payable to the order of the
Contractor and the City does not assume and shall not have any responsibility for the
allocation of payments or obligations of the Contractor to third parties.
ARTICLE 8. The City reserves the right to cancel the award of any contract at any time
before the execution of the Agreement by all parties including without limitation any
subject property owner without any liability against the City.
ARTICLE 9. The City may by written notice terminate this Agreement or any portion
thereof when it is deemed in the best public, state or national interest to do so; or the
City is unable to adequately fund payment for the Agreement because of changes in
state fiscal policy, regulations or law; or after finding that for reasons beyond the
Contractor's control the Contractor is prevented from proceeding with or completing the
Work within a reasonable period of time.
In the event that any Work is terminated under the provisions hereof, all completed
items or units of work will be paid for at the Agreement Bid Prices. Payment for partially
completed items or units of work will be made in accordance with the procedures
attached at Exhibit D and as otherwise mutually agreed to by both parties.
Termination of this Agreement or any portion thereof shall not relieve the Contractor of
responsibility far the completed Work, nor shall it relieve the Contractor's Sureties of
their obligations for and concerning any just claims arising out of the Work performed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duty authorized, made and
entered into as of the date first set forth above.
THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BY
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
BY
Thomas D. Burt, City Manager
CONTRACTOR:
�
�
BY
ITS �l-�.�
BY
ITS
CONTRACT NO. 12-1 B
MASTER AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND
HIGHVIEW PLUMBING
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE REPAIR
THIS MASTER AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made this�day of
cc.vtv�,�vt , 2012, by and between the City of Golden Valley, a municipal
corporation ("City"), and Highview Plumbing ("Contractor"), under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
WHEREAS, City operates a voluntary sanitary sewer inflow and infiltration ("I &
I") program along with its Pavement Management Program each year;
WHEREAS, in 2012 the Pavement Management Program will result in the
reconstruction of several miles of City streets along with the sewer and other utilities
within the street rights-of-way within the foliowing roadways:
Circle Down (Turners Crossroad to T.H. 100), Turners Crossroad (Circle
Down to 1394), Harold Avenue (Winnetka Ave to Gtenwood Ave), Rhode
Island North (Harold Ave to T.H. 55), King Creek Road, King Hill Road,
Phoenix Street, Welcome Avenue North, Welcome Circle.
WHEREAS, a homeowner residing within the above-described boundaries and
availing themselves of the voluntary I & I program may wish to repair their lateral sewer
line or related items in connection with their sanitary sewer system;
WHEREAS, this Agreement, Special Provisions and General Conditions attached
hereto as Exhibit A and made a part of this Agreement, provide certain terms and
conditions for: (i) special assessment of an owner's real property for repairs necessary
to bring property in compliance with the City's I & I ordinance; and (ii) payment by the
City for the performance by certain pre-qualified private contractors in making
necessary repairs, replacements or reconstructions of private sanitary sewer service
lines generally from residences to the sanitary sewer main line in the street right-of-way.
WHEREAS, a Private Sanitary Sewer Service Work Order ("Work Order"), a form
of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, shall be executed by Contractor, City and the
property owner and shall incorporate via reference the terms and conditions of this
Agreement including without limitation the Special Provisions. Once a residential
property owner selects the contractor from the City's list of pre-qualified contractors to
make such repairs to the owner's sanitary sewer service line, the owner and the
Contractor shafl agree on the Work Order and it will be attached to this Agreement and
made a part hereof with respect to the Property named in the Work Order to form the
entire Agreement affecting the City, Contractor, and property owner and the Work
(defined below) on the Property identified.
WHEREAS, the Work covered by the Work Order shall be cornpleted by the
Contractor in a timely and professional manner and i� accordance with all applicable
laws and regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between City and Contractor that each
2012 I & I related project to be specially assessed which is undertaken by Contractor
shall be subject to the following terms and conditions including without limitation the
Special Provisions and the terms of any applicable Work Order between Contractor,
City, and the owner of the subject property:
ARTICLE 1. The Contractor hereby covenants and agrees to furnish all materials, all
necessary tools and equipment, and to do and perform all the work and labor necessary
to complete the work in accordance with this Agreement, the Special Provisions,
Standard Details attached hereto as Exhibit C, and any applicable Work Order.
The Plans and Specifications, the proposal of the Contractor (the "Proposal") and the
Contractor's bond, the Work Order and the Special Provisions, together with this
Agreement, shall together constitute the entire Agreement between the parties as if set
forth herein.
ARTICLE 2. The Contractor agrees to commence said Wark and conclude the same in
accordance with the Proposal heretofore filed with the City and in accordance with the
Work Order executed by the City, Contractor, and the subject property owner, including
without limitation the Bid Price as set forth in the Work Order and in accordance with the
time schedule for commencement and completion of the Work set forth in the Special
Provisions, time being of the essence in this Agreement, and to complete said Work in
every respect to the satisfaction and approval of the City and the property owner.
ARTICLE 3. The Contractor further agrees to make, execute, and deliver to the City,
corporate surety bonds, or letter of credit, approved by the City Attorney in the minimum
sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) which are hereby incorporated into this
Agreement for the use of said City and of all persons doing Work or furnishing skilt,
tools, machinery or materials under or for the purpose of this Agreement, to secure the
faithful performance and payment under this Agreement by said Contractor and to be
conditioned as required by law for work undertaken in 2012 in connection with the 2012
PMP. The Contractor also agrees that any time the value of the work performed under
this contract exceeds the $25,004 contract limit, the City shall have the option to modify
this contract and adjusted upwards in $25,000 increments and the Contractor shall
provide new corporate surety bonds, or letter of credit, approved by the City Attorney, in
the amount that the contract has been increased and neither this original Agreement nor
the upwardly adjusted agreements shall become effective unless and until said bands
have been approved by the City Attorney.
ARTICLE 4. In consideration of the covenants and agreements stated above, the City
agrees to pay the Contractor as set forth in Section 12 of the Special Provisions.
ARTICLE 5. It is understood and agreed by the Contractor that the City, through its
authorized agents and the property owner shall be the sole and final judges of the
fitness of the work and its acceptability, and no payment shall be made to the
Contractor hereunder until the work shall have been found acceptable by the City
through its authorized agents and the property owner.
ARTICLE 6. It is understood and agreed by the Contractor that, with respect to all work,
the Contractor will keep as complete, exact, and accurate an account of the labor and
materials used as is possible, and in submitting the final statement will itemize and
allocate the costs of said work.
ARTICLE 7. All payments to the Contractor shall be made payable to the order of the
Contractor and the City does not assume and shall not have any responsibility for the
allocation of payments or obligations of the Contractor to third parties.
ARTICLE 8. The City reserves the right to cancel the award of any contract at any time
before the execution of the Agreement by all parties including without limitation any
subject property owner without any liability against the City.
ARTICLE 9. The City may by written notice terminate this Agreement or any portion
thereof when it is deemed in the best public, state or national interest to do so; or the
City is unable to adequately fund payment for the Agreement because of changes in
state fiscal policy, regulations or law; or after finding that for reasons beyond the
Contractor's control the Contractor is prevented from proceeding with or completing the
Work within a reasonable period of time.
In the event that any Work is terminated under the provisions hereof, all completed
items or units of work will be paid for at the Agreement Bid Prices. Payment for partially
completed items or units of work will be made in accordance with the procedures
attached at Exhibit D and as otherwise mutually agreed to by both parties.
Termination of this Agreement or any portion thereof shall not relieve the Contractor of
responsibility for the completed Work, nor shall it relieve the Contractor's Sureties of
their obligations for and conceming any just claims arising out of the Work pertormed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly authorized, made and
entered into as of the date first set forth above.
THE ClTY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BY
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
BY
Thomas D. Burt, City Manager
CONTRACTOR:
.��
BY c�.;�� 3C���
ITS ��r���r ��� T
BY
ITS
CONTRACT NO. 12-1 C
MASTER AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER, INC.
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE REPAIR
THIS MASTER AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made this��day of
�u,��.�-� , 2012, by and between the City of Golden Valley, a municipal
corporation (`City"), and Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, Inc. ("Contractor"),
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
WHEREAS, City operates a voluntary sanitary sewer inflow and infiltration ("1 &
I") program along with its Pavement Management Program each year;
WHEREAS, in 2012 the Pavement Management Program will result in the
reconstruc#ion of several miles of City streets along with the sewer and other utilities
within the street rights-of-way within the following roadways:
Circle Down (Turners Crossroad to T.H. 100), Turners Crossroad (Circle
Down to 1394), Harold Avenue (Winnetka Ave to Glenwood Ave), Rhode
Island North (Harold Ave to T.H. 55), King Creek Road, King Hill Road,
Phoenix Street, Welcome Avenue North, Welcome Circle.
WHEREAS, a homeowner residing within the above-described boundaries and
availing themselves of the voluntary I & I program may wish to repair their lateral sewer
line or related items in connection with their sanitary sewer system;
WHEREAS, this Agreement, Special Provisions and General Conditions attached
hereto as Exhibit A and made a part of this Agreement, provide certain terms and
conditions for: (i) special assessment of an owner's real property for repairs necessary
to bring property in compliance with the City's I & I ordinance; and (ii) payment by the
City for the performance by certain pre-qualified private contractors in making
necessary repairs, replacements or reconstructions of private sanitary sewer service
lines generally from residences to the sanitary sewer main line in the street right-of-way.
WHEREAS, a Private Sanitary Sewer Service Work Order ("Work Order"), a form
of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, shall be executed by Contractor, City and the
property owner and shall incorporate via reference the terms and conditions of this
Agreement including without limitation the Special Provisions. Once a residential
property owner selects the contractor from the City's list of pre-qualified contractors to
make such repairs to the owner's sanitary sewer service line, the owner and the
Contractor shall agree on the Work Order and it will be attached to this Agreement and
made a part hereof with respect to the Property named in the Work Order to form the
entire Agreement affecting the Gity, Contractor, and property owner and the Work
(defined below) on the Property identified.
WHEREAS, the Work covered by the Work Order shall be completed by the
Contractor in a timely and professional manner and in accordance with all applicable
laws and regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between City and Contractor that each
2012 I & I related project to be specially assessed which is undertaken by Contractor
shall be subject to the following terms and conditions including without limitation the
Special Provisions and the terms of any applicable Work Order between Contractor,
City, and the owner of the subject property:
ARTICLE 1. The Contractor hereby covenants and agrees to furnish all materials, all
necessary tools and equipment, and to do and perform all the work and labor necessary
to complete the work in accordance with this Agreement, the Special Provisions,
Standard Details attached hereto as Exhibit C, and any applicable Work Order.
The Pians and Specifications, the proposal of the Contractor(the "Proposa!") and the
Contractor's bond, the Work Order and the Special Provisions, together with this
Agreement, shall together constitute the entire Agreement befinreen the parties as if set
forth herein.
ARTICLE 2. The Contractor agrees to commence said Work and conclude the same in
accordance with the Proposal heretofore filed with the City and in accordance with the
Work Order executed by the City, Contractor, and the subject property owner, including
without limitation the Bid Price as set forth in the Work Order and in acxordance with the
time schedule for commencement and completion of the Work set forth in the Special
Provisions, time being of the essence in this Agreement, and to complete said Work in
every respect to the satisfaction and approval of the City and the property owner.
ARTICLE 3. The Contractor further agrees to make, execute, and deliver to the City,
corporate surety bonds, or letter of credit, approved by the City Attomey in the minimum
sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) which are hereby incorporated into this
Agreement for the use of said City and of all persons doing Work or furnishing skill,
tools, machinery or materials under or for the purpose of this Agreement, to secure the
faithful pertormance and payment under this Agreement by said Contractor ar� to be
conditioned as required by law for work undertaken in 2012 in connection with the 2012
PMP. The Contractor also agrees that any time the value of the work performed under
this contract exceeds the $25,000 contract limit, the City shall have the option to modify
this contract and adjusted upwards in $25,000 increments and the Contractor shall
provide new corporate surety bonds, or letter of credit, approved by the City Attorney, in
the amount that the contract has been increased and neither this original Agreement nor
the upwardly adjusted agreements shafl become effective uniess and until said bonds
have been approved by the City Attorney.
ARTICLE 4. In consideration of the covenants and agreements stated above, the City
agrees to pay the Contractor as set forth in Section 12 of the Special Provisions.
ARTICLE 5. It is understood and agreed by the Contractor that the City, through its
authorized agents and the property owner shall be the sole and final judges of the
fitness of the work and its acceptability, and no payment shall be made to the
Contractor hereunder until the work shall have been found acceptab(e by the City
through its authorized agents and the property owner.
ARTICLE 6. It is understood and agreed by the Contractor that, with respect to all work,
the Contractor will keep as complete, exact, and accurate an account of the labor and
materials used as is possible, and in submitting the final statement will itemize and
allocate the costs of said work.
ARTICLE 7. All payments to the Contractor shall be made payable to the order of the
Contractor and the City does not assume and shall not have any responsibility for the
allocation of payments or obligations of the Contractor to third parties.
ARTICLE 8. The City reserves the right to cancel the award of any contract at any time
before the execution of the Agreement by all parties including without limitation any
subject property owner without any liability against the City.
ARTICLE 9. The City may by written notice terminate this Agreement or any portion
thereof when it is deemed in the best public, state or national interest to do so; or the
City is unable to adequately fund payment for the Agreement because of changes in
state fiscal policy, regulations or law; or after finding that for reasons beyond the
Contractor's control the Contractor is prevented from proceeding with or completing the
Work within a reasonable period of time.
tn the event that any Work is terminated under the provisions hereof, all completed
items or units of work will be paid for at the Agreement Bid Prices. Payment for partially
completed items or units of work will be made in accordance with the procedures
attached at Exhibit D and as otherwise mutually agreed to by both parties.
Termination of this Agreement or any portion thereof shall not relieve the Contractor of
responsibility for the completed Work, nor shall it relieve the Contractor's Sureties of
their obligations for and concerning any just claims arising out of the Work performed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly authorized, made and
entered into as of the date first set forth above.
THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BY
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
BY
Thomas D. Burt, City Manager
CONTRA OR:
BY �
ITS C� s =e��
BY
ITS
CONTRACT NO. 12-1 D
MASTER AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND
OUVERSON SEWER & WATER, INC.
SANITARY SEWER SERVtCE REPAtR -
,� THIS MASTER AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made this Z� day of
J�^u 4'y , 2012, by and between the City of Golden Valley, a municipal
corporation ("City"), and Ouverson Sewer &Water, Inc. ("Contractor'�, under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
WHEREAS, City operates a voluntary sanitary sewer inflow and infiltration ("1 &
I") program along with its Pavement Management Program each year;
WHEREAS, in 2012 the Pavement Management Program will result in the
reconstruction of several miles of City streets along with the sewer and other utilities
within the street rights-of-way within the following roadways:
Circle Down (Turners Crossroad to T.H. 100), Turners Crossroad (Circle
Down to 1394), Harold Avenue (Winnetka Ave to Glenwood Ave), Rhode
Island North (Harold Ave to T.H. 55), King Creek Road, King Hill Road,
Phoenix Street, Welcome Avenue North, Welc�me Circle.
WHEREAS, a homeowner residing within the above-described boundaries and
availing themselves of the voluntary I & I program may wish to repair their lateral sewer
line or related items in connection with their sanitary sewer system;
WHEREAS, this Agreement, Special Provisions and General Conditions attached
hereto as Exhibit A and made a part of this Agreement, provide certain terms and
conditions for: (i) special assessment of an owner's real properiy for repairs necessary
to bring property in compliance with the City's I & I ordinance; and (ii) payment by the
City for the performance by certain pre-qualified private contractors in making
necessary repairs, replaeements or reconstructions of private sanitary sewer service
lines generally from residences to the sanitary sewer main line in the street right-of-way.
WHEREAS, a Private Sanitary Sewer Service Work Order ("Work Order"), a form
of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, shall be executed by Contractor, City and the
property owner and shall incorporate via reference the terms and conditions of this
Agreement induding without limitation the Special Provisions. Once a residential
property owner seiects the contractor from the City's list of pre-qualified contractors to
make such repairs to the ovmer's sanitary sewer service line, the owner and the
Contractor shall agree on the Work Order and it will be attached to this Agreement and
made a part hereof with respect to the Property named in the Work Order to form the
entire Agreement affecting the City, Contractor, and property owner and the Work
(defined below) on the Property identified.
WHEREAS, the Work covered by the Work Order shall be completed by the
Contractor in a timely and professional manner and in accordance with all appticable
(aws and regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between City and Contractor that each
2012 I & I related project to be specially assessed which is undertaken by Contractor
shall be subject to the following terms and conditions including without limitation the
Special Provisions and the terms of any applicable Work Order between Contractor,
City, and the owner of the subject property:
ARTICLE 1. The Contractor hereby covenants and agrees to furnish all materials, all
necessary tools and equipment, and to do and perform all the work and labor necessary
to complete the work in accordance with this Agreement, the Special Provisions,
Standard Details attached hereto as Exhibit C, and any applicable Work Order.
The Plans and Specifications, the proposal of the Contractor (the "Proposal") and the
Contractor's bond, the Work Order and the Special Provisions, together with this
Agreement, shall together constitute the entire Agreement between the parties as if set
forth herein.
ARTICLE 2. The Contractor agrees to commence said Work and conclude the same in
accordance with the Proposal heretofore filed with the City and in accordance with the
Work Order executed by the City, Contractor, and the subject property owner, including
without limitation the Bid Price as set forth in the Work Order and in accordance with the
time schedule for commencement and completion of the Work set forth in the Special
Provisions, time being of the essence in this Agreement, and to complete said Work in
every respect to the satisfaction and approval of the Gity and the property owner.
ARTICLE 3. The Contractor further agrees to make, execute, and deliver to the City,
corporate surety bonds, or letter of credit, approved by the City Attorney in the minimum
sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) which are hereby incorporated into this
Agreemenf for the use of said City and of all persons doing Work or furnishing skill,
tools, machinery or materials under or for the purpose of this Agreement, to secure the
faithful performance and payment under this Agreement by said Contractor and to be
conditioned as required by law for work undertaken in 2012 in connection with the 2012
PMP. The Contractor also agrees that any time the value of the work performed under
this contract exceeds the $25,000 contract limit, the City shall have the option to modify
this contract and adjusted upwards in $25,000 increments and the Contractor shall
provide new corporate surety bonds, or letter of credit, approved by the City Attorney, in
the amount that the contract has been increased and neither this original Agreement nor
the upwardly adjusted agreements shall become effective unless and until said bonds
have been approved by the City Attorney.
ARTICLE 4. In consideration of the covenants and agreements stated above, the City
agrees to pay the Contractor as set forth in Section 12 of the Special Provisions.
ARTICLE 5. It is understood and agreed by the Contractor that the City, through its
authorized agents and the property owner shall be the sole and final judges of the
fitness of the work and its acceptability, and no payment shall be made to the
Contractor hereunder until the work shall have been found acceptable by the City
through its authorized agents and the property owner.
ARTICLE 6. It is understood and agreed by the Contractor that, with respect to all work,
the Contractor will keep as complete, exact, and accurate an account of the labor and
materials used as is possible, and in submitting the final statement wiil itemize.and
allocate the costs of said work.
ARTICLE 7. All payments to the Contractor shall be made payable to the order of the
Contractor and the City does not assume and shall not have any responsibility for the
allocation of payments or obligations of the Contractor to third parties.
ARTICLE 8. The City reserves the right to cancel the award of any contract at any time
before the execution of the Agreement by alf parties including without limitation any
subject property owner without any liability against the City.
ARTICLE 9. The City may by written notice terminate this Agreement or any portion
thereof when it is deemed in the best public, state or national interest to do so; or the
City is unable to adequately fund payment for the Agreement because of changes in
state fiscal policy, regulations or law; or after finding that for reasons beyond the
Contractor's control the Contractor is prevented from proceeding with or completing the
Work within a reasonable period of time.
In the event that any Work is terminated under the provisions hereof, afl completed
items or units of work will be paid for at the Agreement Bid Prices. Payment for partially
completed items or units of work will be made in accordance with the procedures
attached at Exhibit D and as otherwise mutually agreed to by both parties.
Termination of this Agreement or any portion thereof shall not relieve the Contractor of
responsibility for the completed Work, nor shall it relieve the Contractor's Sureties of
their obligations for and concerning any just claims arising out of the Work performed.
!N WETNESS tNHEREOF, this Agreement ha� b��n duiy authorized, made and
entered in#� as �� the date first set f�rth above.
THE Ci�Y �F GOLDEi� 1lAL�EY
�Y
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
BY
Thamas D. �urt, Ci�y Manager
COt�TftACT�Fi:
t
_ . ��.f-
�Y
CTS �"/'�'cic�-,. �
BY
ITS
PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WORK ORDER
Property Owner:
Property Address:
I "Propertv Owner" hereby acknowledge the information I have provided is complete and
accurate and that I am the fee owner of the property. I also acknowledge that I desire
that the work contained in this document be perFormed on the Property identified above
(the "Property"), and on the sanitary sewer service line providing service to the Property,
by Contractor identified on the attached Pavement Management Program - Private
Sanitary Sewer Service Work Order ("Work Order"). I grant permission for the
Contractor to perform this work on the Property.
I acknowledge that I have read and understand the following restrictions, limitations and
requirements of the sanitary sewer service replacement program.
1. Contractor will remove any obstacles, including but not limited to
sidewalks, trees, landscaping, gardens, private lighting, irrigation systems,
electric dog fences and retaining walls, as necessary to perForm the work
described in this document and that certain Master Agreement befinreen
the City and Contractor including without limitation the documents
attached thereto and made a part thereof. I also understand that the
Contractor will restore any excavated areas with sod or seed and that
reinstallation of all other items will not be performed by Contractor, and
that I will be responsible for any restoration of any of said items.
2. I understand that the sod or seed installed on my private property will be
my responsibility to maintain, including watering; and Contractor will not
provide any warranty for sod or seed.
3. I understand that the sanitary sewer service repairs included in this work
are intended to address the inflow and infiltration of clear water into the
sanitary sewer system only. I also understand that I may choose to make
repairs to address other issues such as settlements or sags in the sanitary
sewer service line which services my home that if not addressed, may
result in blockage of the service line, and potentially result in backup of
sewage into my home. I will not hold the City of Golden Valley or its
agents or contractors liable for any sewage backup resulting from any of
my decisions related to repairs to address non inflow and infiltration
defects.
I further acknowledge this Work Order is subject to a Master Agreement between
Contractor and the City of Golden Valley including without limitation certain Special
Provisions as described therein.
I understand that I will be responsible for 100 percent of the cost of the authorized work,
plus an administrative fee. Both are payable in full to the City of Golden Valley following
completion of the work or through a special assessment certified to my property taxes at
the interest rate established by the City Council over a period of up to ten years. I also
hereby waive my rights to a hearing and appeal of the special assessment for all work
related to sanitary sewer service repairs as outlined herein according to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429.
By signing this document I attest that I have read and understand the above information
and related information. As the undersigned property owner, I release the City of
Golden Valley, its employees, agents and contractors, from any claim or causes of
action in connection with the work authorized herein.
Property Owner's Signature: Date:
Accepted by: Date:
Contractor
Accepted by: Date:
City
� . � � •�
PROPERTY OWNER
ADDRESS
ADDRESS OF SERVICE DAY PHONE NIGHT PHONE
CONTRACTOR
ADDRESS PHONE
Total Cost of Work Constructed:
Administration Fee: 7% of Total Cost up to $250:
� ��� � � �� � ��,y � w��h��i� � �� � �
�; � , § � � �� x��� � � �3; �#�� n
�
�r z �� _ ,.; . � ` � . ,��-r ,� �'�r r.k,. s,� � � `��;r�> �
� �+ `f;/y �
��'�¢ �� , Al+ii��1��✓�� . � �., � .T ��,.��� :� �' i '�� �� � ,�� � ' � _ � � f
, � c . ��� � �
��1��1'1'i� ���" ..,. - - �
�r � � �
�.r, �� ` _.����, . .�,r �� �. ,� , � � ��` ��'�
_ _ , �� ;;.�a �-_
� �: _:. �
�.: ..:. :
:
r: .-.:.;� i
� ...
�� (� Finance
�..
v 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. J. Receipt of January 2012 Financial Reports
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
The monthly financial report provides a progress report on the following funds:
General Fund Operations
Conservation/Recycling Fund (Enterprise Fund)
Water and Sewer Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund)
Brookview Golf Course (Enterprise Fund)
Storm Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund)
The revenues and expenditures show current month actual and year-to-date actual compared
to the 2012 approved budget. As of January 2012, the City General Fund operations is using
$1,052,875 of fund balance to balance the General Fund budget.
Attachments
January 2012 General Fund Financial Report - unaudited (2 pages)
January 2012 Conservation/Recycling Fund Financial Report (Enterprise Fund) - unaudited
(1 page)
January 2012 Water and Sewer Utility Fund Financial Report (Enterprise Fund) - unaudited
(1 page)
January 2012 Brookview Golf Course Financial Report (Enterprise Fund) - unaudited
(1 page)
January 2012 Storm Utility Fund Financial Report (Enterprise Fund) - unaudited (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to receive and file the January 2012 Financial Reports.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Revenues
January, 2012 (unaudited)
Percentage Of Year Completed 8.30%
Over %
2012 January YTD (Under) of Budget
Type Budqet Actual Actual Budget Received
Ad Valorem Taxes $11,702,050 0 0 ($11,702,050) 0.00°/a (1)
Licenses 173,800 3,325 3,325 ($170,475) 1.91%
Permits 628,070 62,216 62,216 ($565,854) 9.91%
Federal Grants 0 0 0 $0
State Aid 10,500 0 0 ($10,500) 0.00% (4)
Hennepin County Aid 0 0 0 $0
Charges For Services
General Government 43,550 645 645 ($42,905) 1.48%
Public Safety 181,745 7,494 7,494 ($174,251) 4.12%
Public Works 125,000 989 989 ($124,011) 0.79%
Park& Rec 395,350 23,336 23,336 ($372,014) 5.90%
Other Funds 1,001,500 0 0 ($1,001,500) 0.00%
Fines & Forfeitures 260,000 0 0 ($260,000) 0.00% (2)
Interest On Investments 110,000 0 0 ($110,000) 0.00% (3)
Miscellaneous Revenue 182,700 2,381 2,381 ($180,319) 1.30%
Transfers In 86,810 0 0 ($86,810) 0.00%
TOTAL Revenue $14,901,075 $100,386 $100,386 ($14,800,689) 0.67%
Notes:
(1) The first half taxes will be received in July.
(2) Fines and Forfeitures first receipt will be in February.
(3) Investments will be booked at year end.
(4) State Training will be received in August.
January, 2012 (unaudited)
Over %
2012 January YTD (Under) Of Budget
Division Budget Actual Actual Budget Expend.
Council $287,755 24,423 24,423 ($263,332) 8.49%
City Manager 697,925 47,508 47,508 (650,417) 6.81%
Admin. Services 1,572,160 80,203 80,203 (1,491,957) 5.10%
Legal 120,000 0 0 (120,000) 0.00% (2)
General Gov't. Bldgs. 570,855 5,662 5,662 (565,193) 0.99%
Planning 317,035 23,469 23,469 (293,566) 7.40%
Police 4,701,500 372,730 372,730 (4,328,770) 7.93%
Fire and Inspections 1,554,480 113,683 113,683 (1,440,797) 7.31%
Public Works Admin. 315,365 22,662 22,662 (292,703) 7.19%
Engineering 663,425 14,870 14,870 (648,555) 2.24%
Streets 1,386,530 99,646 99,646 (1,286,884) 7.19%
Community Center 75,355 3,814 3,814 (71,541) 5.06%
Park& Rec. Admin. 646,275 43,580 43,580 (602,695) 6.74%
Park Maintenance 996,780 76,065 76,065 (920,715) 7.63%
Recreation Programs 410,925 22,099 22,099 (388,826) 5.38%
Risk Management 290,000 2,075 2,075 (287,925) 0.72%
Transfers Out 294,710 0 0 (294,710) 0.00°/a (1)
TOTAL Expenditures $14,901,075 $952,489 $952,489 ($13,948,586) 6.39%
(1) Transfers are made in June.
(2) January legal fees would be paid in February.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report-Conservation/Recycling Enterprise Fund
January, 2012 (unaudited)
Over
2012 January YTD (Under) %
Budget Actual Actual Budget Current
Revenue
Hennepin County Recycling Grant 51,425 0 0 (51,425) 0.00%
Recyc(ing Charges 276,000 0 0 (276,000) 0.00%
Interest on Investments 5,000 0 0 (5,000) 0.00% (1)
Total Revenue 332,425 0 0 (332,425) 0.00%
Expenses:
Recycling 453,605 0 0 (453,605) 0.00% (2)
Total Expenses 453,605 0 0 (453,605) 0.00%
(1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end.
(2j This includes no ourbside services billing as of YTD.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report-Water and Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund
January,2012(unaudited)
Over
2012 January YTD (Under) %
Budget Actual Actual Budget Current
Revenue
Water Charges 4,022,955 88,965 88,965 (3,933,990) 2.21%
Sewer Charges 3,236,245 85,428 85,428 (3,150,817) 2.64%
Meter Sales 5,000 0 0 (5,000) 0.00%
MCES Grant Program 0 0 0 0
Penalties 120,000 2,868 2,868 (117,132) 2.39%
Charges fqr Other Services 220,000 2,035 2,035 (217,965) 0.93%
State Water Testing Fee Pass Through 43,000 179 179 (42,821) 0.42%
Certificate of Compliance 60,000 3,750 3,750 (56,250) 6.25%
Interest Earnings 65,000 0 0 (65,000) 0.00%
Total Revenue 7,772,200 183,225 183,225 (7,588,975) 2.36%
Expenses:
Utility Administration 1,913,620 (265,297) (265,297) (2,178,917) -13.86% (1)
Sewer Maintenance 2,441,390 355,331 355,331 (2,086,059) 14.55%
Water Maintenance 4,098,800 36,826 36,826 (4,061,974) 0.90%
Total Expenses 8,453,810 126,860 126,860 (8,326,950) 1.50%
(1)Contract work that was worked in 2011 has not been paid in 2012. (Audit payable)
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report-Brookview Golf Course Enterprise Fund(3)
January, 2012(unaudited)
Over
2012 January YTD (Under) %
Budget Actual Actual Budget Current
Revenue
Fees and Lessons 879,100 0 (879,100) 0.00%
Driving Range Fees 107,700 0
Par 3 Fees 195,150 0
Pro Shop Sales 82,000 254 (81,746) 0.31%
Pro Shop Rentals 235,200 0 (235,20Q) 0.00%
Concession Sales 218,200 50 (218,150) 0.02%
Other Revenue 69,000 1 (68,999) 0.00%
Interest Earnings 15,000 0 (15,000) 0.00% (1)
Less:Credit Card Charges/Sales Tax (38,000) 0 38,000 0.00%
Total Revenue 1,763,350 0 305 (1,763,045) 0.02%
Expenses:
Golf Operations 649,565 18,252 18,252 (631,313) 2.$1% (2)
Course Maintenance 721,620 25,876 25,876 (695,744) 3.59%
Pro Shop 111,600 8,344 8,344 (103,256) 7.48%
Grill 176,190 1,324 1,324 (174,866) 0.75%
Driving Range 44,320 0 0 (44,320) 0.00%
Par 3 Course 29,730 (30) (30) (29,760) -0.10%
Total Expenses 1,733,025 53,766 53,766 (1,679,259j 3.10%
(1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end.
(2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end.
(3) Course has not opened yet.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report-Storm Utility Enterprise Fund
January,2012(unaudited)
Over
2012 January YTD (Under) %
Budget Actual Actual Budget Curirent
Revenue
Interest Earnings 40,000 0 0 (40,000) 0.00% (1)
Storm Sewer Charges 2,228,920 129,905 129,905 (2,099,015) 5.83%
Bassett Creek Watershed 1,080,200 0 0 (1,080,200) 0.00%
State Grant-Other 2,920 2,920 2,920
Total Revenue 3,349,120 132,825 132,825 (3,216,295) 3.97%
Expenses:
Storm Utility 2,777,630 69,782 69,782 (2,707,848) 2.51% (2)
Street Cleaning 121,780 1,117 1,117 (120,663) 0.92%
Environmental Control 240,050 11,050 11,050 (229,000) 4.60%
Debt Service Payments 435,125 0 0 (435,125) 0.00%
Total Expenses 3,574,585 81,949 81,949 (3,492,636) 7..29%
(1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end.
(2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end and 2011 PMP is not complete.
� -, � :.;.
� �
�-.,
O << t ��� e Public Works
..� 763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. K. Second Consideration - Ordinance No. 478 -Amendment to Section 6.35, Expanding
Commercial and Institutional Recycling Program
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Mark Ray, PE, Engineer
Summary
On January 1, 2012, the City started a new curbside recycling program contract with Allied
Waste. Under the old contract, churches were provided with free recycling service, with the
City paying the cost to process the materials. Staff was not aware of any churches
participating in this free service and as a result this provision was not included in the nevv
recycling contract.
The proposed revisions to the City Code are to clarify that multiple family, commercial, and
other institutions may participate in the City's curbside recycling program and be charged for
this service. The proposed revisions to the City Code specify that multiple family residences,
commercial and institutions may contract with either the City or a licensed private hauler for
recycling services. By specifying that these types of properties may contract with either the
City or a private hauler, there is no ambiguity about the ability of such property owners to
avail themselves of either the City service or the services of a private hauler.
In addition, multifamily recycling is no longer required to be a weekly service. The recycling
industry as a whole is moving #oward every other week service (using larger carts inste�d of
bins). Revising this item in the code will make it consistent with current industry practic�s.
The City Council approved the ordinance on its first consideration on February 6, 2012. If the
Council adopts the ordinance on its second consideration, it will be effective upon publication.
Attachments
Ordinance No. 478, Amending Section 6.35, Expanding Commercial and Institutional
Recycling Program (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt on Second Consideration, Ordinance No. 478, Amending Section 6.35,
Expanding Commercial and Institutional Recycling Program.
ORDINANCE NO. 478, 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
Amending Section 6.35, Expanding Commercial and Institutional Recycling Program
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. City Code Section 6.35, Subdivision 11(A) is hereby deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following language:
A. Curb�side Recycling. The City shall contract for curbside recycling to all single and
multiple family residences of four (4) units or less. Cost of said program will be billed on
a quarterly basis to all such property owners, based on the cost of providing the service
less any subsidy provided by Hennepin County.
Section 2. City Code Section 6.35, Subdivision 11(B) is hereby deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following language:
B. Commercial and Institutional Recycling. Commercial and institutional entities
within the City shall contract, through a licensed private hauler or the City, for
recycling for a minimum of every other week collection, the cost of which shall be
paid by said commercial or institutional entity.
Section 3. City Code Section 6.35, Subdivision 11(C) is hereby deleted in its entirely
and replaced with the following language:
C. Multifamily Recycling. Owners of multifamily dwellings containing more than four (4)
dwelling units shall provide a recycling collection service, through a licensed private
hauler or the City, for their residents with a designated on-site collection area. Owners
shall contract for a minimum of every other week collection of the recyclables from the
on-site collection area, the cost of which shall be paid by the multifamily dwelling
owner. Such collection shall include, at a minimum, all materials collected in the City's
curbside recycling program maintained in accordance with this Section and shall meet
applicable Hennepin County requirements.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions
Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 6.99 entitled
"Violation a Misdemeanor or Petty Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by
reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage
and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 21st day of February, 2012
/s/Shepard M. Harris
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/Susan M. Virnia
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
� ����
�� : .x.; ,
� ,
p � � � P Finance
0 � �' �/ 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. L. Second Consideration - Ordinance #479 -Amendment to the 2012 Master Fee
Schedule - Commercial and Institutional Recycling
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Commercial and Institutional entities within the City will be able to work with the Public Works
Department to evaluate their recycling program. Some entities may want to contract with the
City's hauler. If feasible, and agreeable, the account will be billed with the City's utility bill.
The fee will be $3.33 per cart/per month if approved by staff and Allied Waste. Multiple Unit
Dwellings are covered under the residential recycling fee.
The City Council approved the ordinance on its first consideration on February 6, 2012. If the
Council adopts the ordinance on its second consideration, it will be effective upon publication.
Attachments
Ordinance #479, Amendment to the 2012 Master Fee Schedule - Commercial and
Institutional Recycling (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt on Second Consideration, Ordinance #479, Amendment to the 2012 Master
Fee Schedule - Commercial and Institutional Recycling.
ORDINANCE NO. 479, 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
Amendment to the Master Fee Schedule for
Commercial and Institutional Recycling
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains:
Section 1. The Master Fee Schedule in Chapter 25 of the City Code is hereby
amended by adding the following:
Commercial/Institutional Recycling per cart 1-Feb $3.33/month
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions
Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in
its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 21 st day of February, 2012.
/s/Shepard M. Harris
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/Susan M. Virniq
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
� - .
��.. � � �
���
Planning
O �'��F e 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax)
���
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. M. Authorization to Sign Purchase Agreement for 1850 Toledo Avenue North
Prepared By
Joe Hogeboom, City Planner
Summary
Todd Richardson, representative of the Estate of Lawrence M. Richardson, has agreed to sell
the property at 1850 Toledo Avenue (Lot 17, Block 2, Scheid's Terrace) to the City. The
home on the property is completely surrounded by Scheid Park. The Comprehensive Plan
sets the acquisition of the property for the completion of Scheid Park as one of its long term
goals.
The seller has agreed to sell the property for $200,000. The property was appraised by
Hennepin County in 2010 for $254,000. However, an independent appraisal conducted on
behalf of the City appraised the property between $160,000 and $170,000. The seller will
conduct an estate sale later in the spring. Then, the City will demolish the home and in-
ground pooL
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Resolution Approving the Purchase of the Real Property Located at 1850 Toledo Avenue
North and Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement.
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution Approving the Purchase of the Real Property Located at 1850
Toledo Avenue North and Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to Execute a Purchase
Agreement (1 page)
Location - 1850 Toledo Avenue North
, _�_
,� �� � 1871 . , � 1931
�i 1851 �i �'�/ � z
l� 1831 ` 1841 � �� � i �\ � �
.''.` '' :-' ,�
i
\, `� 1i - "p P�e N ` .,, �
1827 •,,�1 _�to`ed !"l� \�,,,� $'
� �
-- �' ` �
i
� --_- " �
1850 1 '
,
�
�
�' i
� � � � ,.. ,.v_ _ �
��
Scheid Park i �f
1856 , - _
r"�
/
1735 �'
-__� / �,�� :.\
- �--.` ' r 5061
� - /
, ,...
� �--�._�l �...
�
5308 1 5300
r ` 5101
� 5218 ,� �.
� ��' . � � ��a st�� `�''..., 1;
, � ,; �a
_ -St Crobc Aw N — — — — -`_ _. .� �
�
-.--T- _ \c . 5020
`� 5010
Resolution 12-11 February 21, 2012
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF THE REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1850 TOLEDO AVENUE NORTH AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PURCHASE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the property located at 1850 Toledo Avenue (Lot 17, Block 2, Scheid's
Terrace) is surrounded by Scheid Park; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan states the acquisition of this property is a goal
of completing the master plan for Scheid Park; and
WHEREAS, the real property consisting of Lot 17, Block 2, Scheid's Terrace has
been offered to the City of Golden Valley for sale for $200,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves the
purchase of the real property located at 1850 Toledo Avenue North, Lots 17, Block 2,
Scheid's Terrace (P.I.D. #18-029-24-32-0046), for $200,000 and authorizes the Mayor and
City Manager and to execute a Purchase Agreement therefore.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
. ��
� :� � � � �'
Planning
0 ��� �, e 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. N. Letter of Support for Shelter Corporation's Application for HOME Funding
Prepared By
Joe Hogeboom, City Planner
Summary
The City has been asked to support the Shelter Corporation's application for funding through
the Hennepin County Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) program. In its
request, the Shelter Corporation seeks funding to make improvements and renovations to the
Golden Valley Townhomes, located at 2100 Douglas Drive.
Attachments
Letter from the Shelter Corporation dated February 13, 2012 (1 page)
Letter of support from Mayor Harris dated February 21, 2012 (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign the letter of support on behalf of the Shelter
Corporation's application for rehabilitation of the Golden Valley Townhomes, located at 2100
Douglas Drive.
� J��J[.:r .�.r�� �.
� ��
������� ��[��"�
February 13, 2012
Shep Harris, Mayor
City of Golden Valley
78Q0 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
sharris@goldenvalleymn.gov
Dear Mayor Harris:
We are pleased to inform you that we are applying for Hennepin County HOME funding
to rehabilitate the Golden Valley Townhouses.
Located at 2100 Douglas Drive in Golden Valley, Golden Valley Townhouses includes
eight 3-bedroom family townhomes. All of the townhomes are affordable to households
earning less than 50% of the area median income, with rental assistance available for
100% of the residents.
The project was built in 1982, rehabilitated in 2000 and is now in need of renovations
and code updates, both interior and exterior. Shelter Corporation plans to use Green
Certified products which will result in lower costs for energy, water, maintenance and
repairs over the lifetime of the structures and increase the return on the investment
made by the funders. The impact of the Golden Valley Townhouses' clean and green
housing will be a significant benefit to the families that it serves and to the community.
Golden Valley Townhouses have been providing quality rental housing to low income
families in Golden Valley for over 30 years and we look forward to being an important
part of this community for another 30+ years.
Sincerely,
John Q. Hunsicker
Housing Developer
1600 Hopkins Crossroad, Minnetonka, MN 55305 • (952) 358-5100 • jhunsickerQsheltercorp.com
� �it�'��mf �
� ��.����� � ���.
�.. "
7�00���d����r'�y����
�cst���t��I��y,d�T�s.�A27
February 21, 2012
Mr. Phil Eckhert, Director
Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works and Transit
701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
Re: HOME Funding for Improvements to the Golden Valley Townhomes
Dear Director Eckhert:
The City of Golden Valley has recently been made aware of the Shelter
Corporation's application for Hennepin County Home Investment Partnership
Program (HOME) funding. The funds would be used to make improvements
to the Golden Valley Townhomes, located at 2100 Douglas Drive. The
Golden Valley Townhomes, originally constructed in 1982, provide workforce
rental housing opportunities for the community.
The City believes that renovations to the Golden Valley Townhomes meet
the criteria set forth by HOME. Maintenance and repair to the property is
critical, so that it can continue to serve families in the community. As a
component of the proposed renovation project, the Shelter Corporation plans
to incorporate Green Certified products whenever possible. This helps meet
the sustainability goals of the City.
High-quality, sustainable affordable housing opportunities are a priority to the
City. Golden Valley is committed to enhancing its existing affordable housing
through projects such as this. Please consider the Shelter Corporation's
request for HOME funding for renovations to the Golden Valley Townhomes.
Sincerely,
Shepard M. Harris
Mayor
7�3�5�3�$��� _��763-593-�109 -�,z,763-593-396� �uv�.�t�1d�r�w�l�ey��,���
�at
��.�, ��� ����& ��
� . .
� � City Administration/Council
� � ° µ � �, e/ 763-593-8014/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary for Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. O. Authorization to Sign Agreement with the Metropolitan Consortium of Community
Developers for Open To Business
Prepared By
Jeanne Andre, Assistant City Clerk
Summary
The City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the submission of a request for matching
funds through the 2011 Hennepin County Economic Development Initiative, to participate with
the City of New Hope in the Open To Business program. Hennepin County subsequently
approved this request, with a starting date of March 1, 2012.
The next step in the process is to approve an agreement with the Metropolitan Consortium of
Community Developers (MCCD) for services from March 1, 2012, through February 28, 2013.
The project has been structured so that the $10,000 annual service fee for Golden Valley and
New Hope will be provided for by a contract with each of the cities that calls for each city to
pay a fee of$2,500, with a second $5,000 payment to be made by Hennepin County on behalf
of the cities. The City of New Hope has already approved this agreement. Hennepin County
has executed an agreement with MCCD to make the second $5,000 payment on behalf of
Golden Valley and New Hope.
Attachment
Contract for Services Between the Cities of Golden Valley and New Hope & Metropolitan
Consortium of Community Developers for the Open To Business Program, dated March 1,
2012 (7 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the City Manager to sign the Contract for Services Between the Cities of
Golden Valley and New Hope & Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers for the
Open To Business Program.
Contract for Services
Between the Cities of Golden Valley and New Hope
&
Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers
for the
Open to Business Program
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into as of the 1 St day of March, 2012, (the "Effective
Date") between the Cities of Golden Valley and New Hope, (herein collectively referred to as
"GVNH") and Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers, (herein referred to as
"MCCD").
WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley and the City of New Hope wish to retain an entity with
the capacity to provide small business technical assistance to existing businesses and those
parties interested in opening a business in Golden Valley and New Hope; and have elected to
jointly promote and market such a program to be called the Golden Valley and New Hope Open
to Business Program (referred to herein as the "Initiative");
WHEREAS, MCCD has represented itself as competent to provide the services required to
administer and carry out the Initiative; and
WHEREAS, GVNH wishes to engage MCCD to provide said services necessary to carry out the
Initiative.
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties hereto that:
1. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The service to be provided by MCCD shall commence upon execution of this Agreement
and shall tertninate as of February 28, 2013 unless earlier terminated. All services,
documents, and information to be furnished or performed by MCCD in order to carry out
the Initiative shall be furnished or performed as promptly as possible, and with the fullest
due diligence.
2. COMPENSATION
Total compensation to MCCD shall be $10,000 for a one year period (the "Contract
Amount") to manage the Initiative. The Contract Amount will be paid in two equal
installments: the first installment will be $5,000, which shall be comprised of a$2,500
payment due and payable by the City of Golden Valley and a$2,500 payment due and
payable by the City of New Hope upon execution of this Agreement, and on or about 6
months from the Effective Date, MCCD shall invoice each city which is a party to this
Agreement for the second installment, each such invoice shall be in the amount of
$2,500.00 and shall be payable by the Hennepin County Housing Redevelopment
Authority.
1
3. SCOPE OF SERVICES
MCCD will provide technical assistance to existing Golden Valley and New Hope
businesses, residents and parties interested in starting a business in Golden Valley and
New Hope; (See Exhibit A Scope of Services-Golden Valley and New Hope Open to
Business Program).
4. REPORTING
MCCD agrees to submit quarterly reports related to its operation of the Initiative. Items
to be reported on include,but are not limited to, the following:
, ➢ Number of inquiries
➢ Hours of technical assistance provided
➢ Type of assistance provided
➢ Type of business
➢ Annual sales revenue of businesses served
➢ Number of businesses opened
➢ Number of business expanded/stabilized
➢ Number and amounts of financing packages
➢ Demographic information on entrepreneurs
The required reporting schedule is as follows:
lst quarter January—March, report due Apri130tn
2°a quarter April—June, report due July 31 St
3`d quarter July—September,report due October 31St
4th quarter October—December, report due January 31 St of 2013
MCCD will provide additional reports as requested by the GVNH.
5. PERSONNEL
MCCD represents that it has, or will secure, at its own expense, all personnel required in
performing the services to carry out the Initiative. Such personnel shall not be employees
of or have any contractual relationship with GVNH. No tenure or any other rights or
benefits, including worker's compensation, unemployment insurance, medical care, sick
leave,vacation pay, severance pay, or any other benefits available to GVNH employees
2
shall accrue to MCCD or employees of MCCD performing services under this
Agreement. The MCCD is an independent contractor.
All of the services required to carry out the Initiative will be performed by MCCD, and
all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized or
permitted under State and local law to perform such work.
6. INTEREST OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY,EDA AND OTHERS
No officer, member, or employee of GVNH, and no member of its governing body, and
no other public official or governing body of the locality in which the Initiative is situated
or being carried out, who exercises any functions or responsibilities in the review or
approval of the undertaking or carrying out of the Initiative, shall participate in the
decision relating to this Agreement which affects his/her personal interest or the interest
of any corporation,partnership, or association in which he/she is, directly or indirectly,
interested or has any personal or pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement
or proceeds thereof.
7. ASSIGNABILTY
MCCD shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest
in the same without the prior written approval of GVNH thereta
8. COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL LAWS
MCCD agrees to comply with all federal and state laws, statutes and applicable
regulations and the ordinances of the GVNH.
9. INSURANCE
MCCD agrees to provide proof of workers' compensation in the statutory amounts, auto
liability (hired, owned and non-owned), and comprehensive general liability insurance by
providing certificates of insurance, naming the city as an additional insured, not later than
ten(10) days after execution of this Agreement. Comprehensive general liability and auto
liability insurance shall be in the minimum amount of$1,500,000.
10. HOLD HARMLESS
MCCD agrees to defend,protect, indemnify and hold harmless GVNH, their elected
officials, agents, officers and employees harmless from and against all liabilities, losses,
damages, costs, and expenses, whether personal, property, or contractual, including
reasonable attorney's fees, arising out of, or related to the provision of services under the
Agreement or with respect to errors or omissions in performance of professional services
related to the Initiative, and from any act of negligence of MCCD, its officers,
employees, servants, agents, or contractors.
GVNH agree to defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless the MCCD, its agents,
officers and employees harmless from and against all liabilities, losses, damages, costs,
and expenses, whether personal,property, or contractual, including reasonable attorney's
fees, arising out of, or related to the administration and operation of the Initiative, and
3
from any act of negligence of GVNH, their officers, employees, servants, agents, or
contractors.
11. NOTICES
A notice, demand, or other communication under the Agreement by either party to the
other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by mail,postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, or delivered personally; and
(a) In the case of MCCD, is addressed or delivered personally to:
David Chapman, Director of Lending and Operations
Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers
3137 Chicago Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55407
(b) In the case of the GVNH:
Jeanne Andre
Assistant HRA Director
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Curtis Jacobsen
Director of Community Development
City of New Hope
4401 Xylon Ave N
New Hope, MN 55428
or at such other address with respect to any party as that party may designate in writing
and forward to the other as provide in the Section.
12. MODIFICATION AND GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota law and may not be modified, changed,
or amended in any manner whatsoever without the prior written approval of all the parties
hereto.
13. TERMINATION
The City may by written notice terminate the Agreement or any portion thereof when it is
deemed in the City's best interest to do so or the City is unable to adequately fund
payment for the Agreement because of changes in State fiscal policy, regulation or law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day
and year first written above.
4
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY METROPOLITAN CONSORTIUM
OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS
By: By:
Tom Burt, City Manager Jim Roth, Its Executive Director
CITY OF NEW HOPE
By
Curtis Jacobsen,Its Community Development Director
5
Exhibit A
Scope of Services
Open for Business Technical Assistance Services
MCCD will provide intensive one-on-one technical assistance to Golden Valley and New Hope
businesses, Golden Valley and New Hope residents and aspiring entrepreneurs intending to
establish,purchase, or improve a business in Golden Valley and New Hope. Technical
assistance includes, but is not limited to,the following:
➢ Business plan development
➢ Feasibility analysis
➢ Marketing
➢ Cashflow and other financial projection development
➢ Operational analysis
➢ City and State licensing and regulatory assistance
➢ Loan packaging, and other assistance in obtaining financing
➢ Help in obtaining competent legal advice
MCCD will also provide technical assistance on a walk-in basis at least monthly in the City Halls
of the cities of Golden Valley and New Hope or as requested at a place of business within
Golden Valley and New Hope.
Open for Business Access to Capital
Access to capital will be provided to qualifying businesses through MCCD's Emerging Small
Business Loan Program (see Exhibit B Small Business Loan Program Guidelines below).
MCCD also provides its financing in partnership other community lenders, banks or both.
6
EXHIBIT B
Small Business Loan Program Guidelines
Loan Amounts•
• Up to $25,000
• Designed to leverage other financing programs as well as private financing provided by
the commercial banking community.
Eli�ible Proiects:
• Borrowers rr�ust be a "f�r-profit"busirless.
• Business must be camplimentary to the existing Golden Valley and New Hope business
community.
• Borrowers must have equity injection as determined by fiind management.
Allowable Use of Proceeds:
• Loan proceeds can be used for working capital, inventory, equipment ar►d general
business operations.
Interest Rates:
• Loan interest rate is normally fixed at 10%.
Loan Term Len�th:
• Loan repayment terms will generally range from three to five years.
Fees and Cha�es:
• Borrowers are responsible for paying all customary legal and other loan closing costs.
000090/480568/1452494_1
7
C �
�� � ��� �� s.
�. ���
Finance
o � ��:� � e
763-593-8013 I 763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
3. P. Establishing Limited Clean-up and Property Damage Protection for Sewer Back-ups and
Water Main Breaks for Water and Sewer Customers
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
In 2007, the City received No-Fault Sewer Back-up Insurance coverage from the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. In 2012, the League expanded that coverage to include
water main breaks. The City is required to adopt a new resolution including water main break
coverage.
Attachments
Resolution Establishing Limited Clean-up and Property Damage Protection for Sewer Back-
ups and Water Main Breaks for Water and Sewer Customers (3 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution Establishing Limited Clean-up and Property Damage Protection
for Sewer Back-ups and Water Main Breaks for Water and Sewer Customers.
Resolution 12-12 February 21, 2012
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LIMITED CLEAN-UP AND PROPERTY DAMAGE
PROTECTION FOR SEWER BACK-UPS AND WATER MAIN BREAKS FOR
WATER AND SEWER CUSTOMERS
WHEREAS, the City provides water and sanitary sewer services to many of the
property owners within the City; and
WHEREAS, water main breaks may cause water to enter into property causing
damage; and
WHEREAS, blockages or other conditions in city sanitary sewer lines may cause the
back-up of sewage into properties that are connected to those city sanitary lines; and
WHEREAS, water main breaks and sewer back-ups pose a public health and safety
concern; and
WHEREAS, it is often difficult to determine the exact cause and responsibility for
water main and sanitary sewer back-ups; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to encourage the expeditious clean-up of
properties that have encountered damage from water main breaks and sewer back-ups;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to minimize the potential of expensive lawsuits
arising out of water main breaks and sanitary sewer back-up claims; and
WHEREAS, the City is a member of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
(LMCIT); and
WHEREAS, LMCIT has offered the City limited "no fault" sewer coverage and water
main break coverage that will reimburse property users of the water and sewer system for
certain clean-up costs and property damage regardless of whether the City is at fault; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council pf the City of Golden
Valley, Minnesota, as follows: the City, as part of the contract for providing water and
sewer services to the customers of the City, and in consideration of the payment of water
and sewer bills, agrees to reimburse water and sanitary sewer customers for up to $10,000
of clean-up costs and property damages caused by a water main break or sanitary sewer
back-up, regardless of whether the City is negligent or otherwise legally liable for damages,
subject to the following conditions:
Resolution 12-12 - Continued\ February 21, 2012
I. Sanitary Sewer Back-Ups. For Sanitary sewer back-ups:
A. The back-up must have resulted from a condition in the City's sanitary sewer system
or lines, and not from a condition in a private line.
B. The back-up must not have been caused by catastrophic weather or other events
for which Federal Emergency Management Assistance is available.
C. The back-up must not have been caused by an interruption in electric power to the
City's sewer system or to any City lift station, which continues for more than 72
hours.
D. The back-up must not have been caused by rainfall or precipitation that would
constitute a 100-year storm as determined by the National Weather Service.
E. Neither the City nor LMCIT will reimburse any costs which have been or are eligible
to be covered under a property owner's own homeowners' or other property
insurance, or which would be eligible to be reimbursed under a National Flood
Insurance Protection (NFIP) policy, whether or not the property owner actually has
NFIP Coverage.
F. The maximum amount that the City or LMCIT will reimburse is $10,000 per building,
per year. In this regard, a structure or group of structures served by a single
connection to the City's sewer system is considered a single building.
II. Water Main Breaks. For water main breaks:
A. LMCIT will pay for claims presented by the City for water main break damage to
property of others which was not caused by the City's negligence.
B. Neither the City nor LMCIT will pay for damages or expenses for which the property
owner has been or is eligible to be reimbursed by any homeowners' or other
property insurance.
C. The maximum amount that the City or LMCIT will reimburse is $10,000 to any
claimant, regardless of the number of occurrences or the number of properties
affected.
D. Neither the City nor LMCIT will pay more than $250,000 for water main break
damages resulting from any single occurrence. All water main break damage which
occurs during any period of 72 consecutive hours is deemed to result from a single
occurrence. If the total water main break damage for all claimants in a single
occurrence exceeds $250,000, the reimbursement to each claimant will be
calculated as follows:
1. A preliminary reimbursement figure is established for each claimant, equal to the
lesser of the claimant's actual damages or $10,000.
2. The sum of the preliminary reimbursement figures for all claimants will be
calculated.
3. Each claimant will be paid a percentage of his or her preliminary reimbursement
figure, equal to the percentage calculated by dividing $250,000 by the sum of all
claimants' preliminary reimbursement figures.
Resolution 12-12 - Continued February 21, 2012
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
�t �� ���`k'�=: y+
�} .- ,°y. � "�" v I
� Planning
O �� �== _ � �, e 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
"60 Days" Deadline: February 24, 2012
Agenda Item
4. A. Public Hearing - Preliminary Design Plan Approval - PUD #88 - Breck Addition -
Amendment#1 - 123 Ottawa Avenue North - Breck School, Applicant
Prepared By
Bryanna Vidden, Planning Intern
Summary
At the January 23, 2012, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission held an informal
public hearing on the Preliminary PUD Plan for Amendment No. 1 to Breck School PUD No.
88. The amendment would allow Breck School to expand the portion of its building known as
the Upper School. This amendment proposal calls for the demolition and rebuilding of a two-
story portion of the school, to be replaced by a new four-story building.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval. However, residents
expressed concern about the height of the building, as well as the presence of construction
traffic and noise throughout the construction process. The Planning Commission addressed
the issue at the meeting, and it is on the record that this issue will be addressed through the
building permit process. As part of this approval, recommendations from the Planning
Commission can be found below within the "Recommended Action" section of this report.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Applicant's Narrative (1 page)
Planning Commission Minutes dated January 23, 2012 (4 pages)
Memo to the Planning Commission dated January 5, 2012 (2 pages)
Memo from Public Works Specialist Eric Eckman dated January 13, 2012 (3 pages)
Memo from Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson dated January 10, 2012 (1 page)
E-mail from Daniel and Kristen Charette dated January 13, 2012 (1 page)
Site Plans and Graphics comparing the current building height to that of the proposed
building (15 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the Preliminary Design Plan, Amendment No. 1, PUD No. 88, Breck
Addition, subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These plans
were prepared by Holabird & Root and include the following: G1-3 site plan, G1-9 green
roof& ground coverage diagrams, G1-10 overall 100, 150 & 200 level floor plans, A2-1
foundation floor plan, A2-2 100 & 150 level floor plan, A2-3 200 level floor plan, A2-4 300
level floor plan, A2-5 400 level floor plan, A2-6 500 level roof plan, penthouse plan & 600
level penthouse roof plan, A2-7 150 north classroom renovation floor plan, A4-1 and A4-2
building elevations, A4-5 building sections, new upper school elevations and diagram
comparing height of existing chapel bell tower and proposed new building.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Public Works
Specialist Eric Eckman to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development, dated
January 13, 2012, shall become a part of this approval.
3. All recommendations and requirements outlined in the memorandum from Deputy Fire
Marshal Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated
January 10, 2012, shall become a part of this approvaL
4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code.
5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws
with authority over this development.
�? i � �
�� �� � s-- .. ,
� �j } �„ \`°- __. _ ,_ � ;'Stha�ret�a/ifield Po»cf i
= j� --�
�°} i o � � Schaper Park ,a
J r,�, 4 s � �' schaper Parxd �;
{ ° t1 � F � ��
� 'C�`� � � Q t'F� . .. � — � �r%� ��SCPtB�f�Lf.�..�, � ��' .
G�t � 1 1 � � �i � f ,}=
.�..� ��. I S � � � � r' r,'...1_
`' 3 1 Lffa�F+crrd� �`.st
,,. __ _ .- ^° ,i i t\ ;.-�..- .r ''��t � E� �
_--° � f
-��H"�Y�5 E�to H►vy 10�N6��-„ ^-- �Staie H�NorSS H��_- ��..� _ _� _ ,. ,_C?tsan�AsmariaE-Hwy� � �, � _
�
- -� _.._...._
> >, �� g�n y f,� �'a__ _ _ _ ,. " - _ .s .._ _ St�t�Hwy�No:35�- -__ _ _ -„ _,w_,. �,
� `ti„� � � �P�tl C�Q Olson Memorial Hvty� ,�- -- -. — - 9,_. _ _
�
, � � s� �.,. i r
, , � _
� �� �
r ��e�iin Te�
�� - ' 4; � �� Subject Property „ ,-%�t ��
�a �,. Pw,d , ,�, ' r `'� ,,Y��, y t �
1� �� t L_J''+' I 1 � /� �,�/�i i a,'�� ���.J L,,..=--''
.T t � � �- ° �- .._ _1 ;'. i ' ��' i'/� i > f' \ ��
! � ii i r r v \"*
"' -^� C ti y l � .�,i ��i�i ��i �Q f t'+.
=WoocMstack Aue " � i t > � ,,: ° `4 �; i%�%/,�� « r �
� � r �� ,/,,,!,;,,;',�',�',
� ��y t t `{r�. . f� f�/� ��/�/�� � /l � � y
;1 y %i i i i i i i i i � � F
� t�144,# ���...� s � .' .'���. : ��������� x �`\
, � ,r,�f/ ; ; ��� �r.�, ,/ /.� � �'
tn 1 1�� iri.i��/. �i���� ���i�� �r � m
" l.arin�La.- -., ri S 1 � , ,�,�/, /, . . ,/,�.�/. . .J . i
� � ��� �i�//' ���/�'����i���r�j�/�� S S9 `''�
� � l , /1��� f�/�/�� ' � / /f
�� �
� �` x r i i /�/f/rr �i� ii N�C�l�tt�t! "" �f
a+ �i 4�tt1:JI~ ' i���'�//�fl�/�l"���i r`� ii,� t`1°._ � --{- L:o[ing L8
,;� a ��,D, BreCk PG�a� �%/%//��j%/•'���/�,� ��� , � 3
�,,, � �j'� �� :''% 'r/r,,�,r'%�ff�,�/.� �;/// '
y� � � �!/� �i /i%��/f,/i�// f'`�/ i i i� . 1 �
�`��C ! t /!���i� i''//f�i���r'�J�'�;i�f��l i�✓/ri'; " ! 'rs.'
�- � .:.��;'r .'�..'.�f,% �'%.� :�'���'�/N�tchez F�ark �
,, u.��.- ; S,��\ ��/�/ii�i��� r�i�i� �/ i ii�ir f��� r,��i' ;. � � �� �{
; ;- > � �%r� ,� � ���!,�r�',, „ ;� �.
� � � , , , , r � o
' Fsrrnenc Fnndl tti. �,`a .'i " .�.�` %%,%��; ' �e�� � �
,�`� ,�a.. � � /,�,/,/,�,�/. ;r!.,/, . �:.�
(/' p. q! � ,,� � f,�..,��%,�i�,, i 1
`'.:��`""----=� i�,� `1, `t, a •, %/'`,//,f,;'fi,�/��r ' '�._ _ -- °�,. �§t
--"'] 0 z
�..�-�--^' "�^. �. , /� ���: '�' `• f.i�AG�f� ,� s� i i1 r � ��� ,4
=.,GI'e».1 Pan�f 3 �S'��r�,� .,. .. .f��� �, � Z Rflonc+k�Rd
"`'�"" - ` -- � „�, ti Gler7t�taOd Tylii�ti�. �o i
�^ � ti �,=�,�"i� � �" -
_-. � �J-,� .� ; �� ,�4 �, I �
� _ �-��; � a�d ti ., � ��3 3 r
�, � �- .'� _ �1� ��G[s�r�wootlAve, _. ... _ ��..__l _.. _ _ ..,�.� b. .. _�_._ � �._ _ _
,� _ 5 k � � ♦� ,�sb t � i
r � � � .
a r""°"i �
�'� � # � `•.�y�`1l3L'tt7W�Ol7d y � ,� �
�r � c � ��� �, �� � ��,� �?
�XEVtle Mi#f�!o»Pavttl � � % � .`�8,,��� `•�, � � �'-` - _�.
� �
t� � � � ����, ti � m �
{ �° �` ��o�ei�tC7c `-��-._.- -- '��4\ ` � � �.
� I �'�+;t 4 1 y
,� 1 a � 1 �tt y�l�t t ( fi
°," } tn 1 � �� ,� ,� 1 �"Jestwoodl.a
�:��«�a,.,s�a�fus.c.�,,,��fi�lzocase�sans ...'.�ti i ,� ''o ras�i � � � �1
Breck School
Request for Amendment of P.U.D. No. 88
Overview of Project:
Breck School has submitted a request for the amendment of P.U.D. No. 88 to pursue the first phase
of a strategic renovation of the facilities located at 123 Ottawa Avenue North in Golden Valley. The
planned renovation represents a long-term commitment to remain in the Golden Valley community.
The current building presently supports the educational and extracurricular activities of 1200 students
in pre-school through grade 12. The scope of the first phase will encompass a complete renovation of
the portion of the building known as the Upper School (grades 9 through 12). Site restrictions make
it difficult for Breck to expand the current footprint of the building, so the current Upper School will be
demolished and re-built. Key highlights of the planned construction include the following:
• Updated electrical and mechanical systems
• Consolidation of Upper School administrative services
• Two additional floors to support Breck's math and science curriculum
• Renovated Media Center that will support the increasing use of technology in education
• A greater number of smaller classrooms, new faculty spaces and new small-group
meeting spaces.
• Two environmentally friendly "green" roofs that will also support Breck's real science
curriculum
• Constructed following the principles of sustainable design
• No planned increase in enrollment
Timeline:
Subject to successful fundraising, the demolition is planned for Friday, June 9, 2012. It is anticipated
that the project will be completed in August 2013.
Project Team:
In addition to the Breck School administration, the project team will consist of the following:
• TEGRA Group — owner representative
• Holabird and Root— architect
• McGough Construction —general contractor
The Breck community is excited to partner with the City of Golden Valley on this project and will be
happy to respond to any questions or concerns.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 2
Lupient, Applicant, stated that five or ix evergreen trees were planted on the west
side couple of years ago to help with th water issues.
Waldhau r opened the public hearing.
Stacy Hoschk 6400 Golden Valley Roa , asked if the rain spout n the building are
directed toward t green space.
Lupient explained that st of the water oes to the wes� � oward the greet�.=�pace. He
stated that they also put in curb along t e west side ��the property,�ntl�the����s a
culvert that runs into a rock b 'n and th �into the. ���reet. ` ?�- �
�F;.
�t ;;
Seeing and hearing no one else wi ing co ent, Waldhau�er clos�d tfie pubjic
hearing.
._£ ;;;
�a3, .�.;.
Kisch stated he feels the applicant has '� �� orated ev�rything?#hat vi���s=�sked of them. � �
The Commissioners agreed.
5 F,
�
MOVED by Kisch, seconded b �� ��chmidg II and rfi � ion c���ied unanimously to
recommend approval of PUD 66, Amen me,nt#4,to � Ilow for the expansion of the�
showroom and entry of the� finiti dealer .'ip�p���s a��ar � a�� addition to the north end of
the building subject to th following corrdi ions:; �� ��
�< ° ;; ,;;
1. The plans submi d with the a�p��i��� n shall become a pa �� of this approval. These
ptans were pre �red by NAI���chite� anc����clude the followi�� � exis#ing and �
demolition si plan, pro������d���t����p1� n, existing floor plans, orien tion plans, floor
plan — buil g A, floo��pian � �uir �� B, exterior elevations and lan cape plan.
2. All reco endations a�d rec���reme s outlined in the memorandum f Deputy
� � Fire M ���shal Ed�Anders������Mark G imes, Director of Planning and Dev pment
date ' eptembe� �7,£2011 shall bec e a part of this approvaL
3. All ��gns on,#he pri�perty"�ust�rreet t e requirements of the City's Sign Code.
4. T ��s approva4>is su�je�t to a`f��other s te, federal, and local ordinances, regulations,
r lawsww�th authority,t�ver this devel ment.
�:
�i � :'
3. In�� . �I�Publ�c��learing — Planned Unit Development Amendment—
��� ,��
Preli���a-r'y;,Plan — 123 Ot�owa Ave. N., Breck School — PU-88 Amendment#1
��a�
Applic���: Breck School
.,,,
Address: 123 Ottawa Avenue North
Purpose: To allow a portion of the existing two-story building (the upper school)
to be demolished and replaced with a new four-story building.
Vidden gave a brief history of the site and explained the applicant's proposal to demolish
and rebuild their upper school building. The proposed new building will include a
renovated media center, consolidation of administrative services, additional small-group
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 3
meeting space and updated mechanical and electrical systems. She stated that horizontal
expansion of the buildings is limited by wetlands, floodplain and the existing athletic fields.
She added that there is no planned increase in enrollment and this is the first phase of a
larger project. She showed the Commission a rendering of the proposed new building and
noted that the new building will be 70 feet in height compared to the existing chapel bell
tower which is 96 feet in height.
Segelbaum asked if staff believes Breck manages traffic satisfactorily. Vidden stated that
the amount of traffic should not change as a result of the proposed cons�uct��n because
Breck's enrollment is expected to stay the same. Hogeboom added th�;���he Pu�lic Safety
�.�
Department works with Breck regarding traffic management and the ca�astruction��raffic
will be managed during the building permit process. �`�
x��a
s
> r ;
Segelbaum asked if staff requested the proposed green roof �`dder�`���ated th�t the City
did not request the green roof, Breck proposed it. Hogeboom��ddec�a#hat b���use Breck
is not proposing to expand the footprint of the building��y3more���an�10°lo��t�iey will not be
required to go to the Bassett Creek Watershed Managerrient�Co�missio�n for review.
�
s;,
Wendy Engelman, Business Manager, Breck Scf�ool, saic�'t�ey are very excited about this
project. The proposed changes will better fit their�aurriculum..and they will work with the
City to address any traffic and safety concerns
Waldhauser referred to an email sent,�y a��ighbor;co:ncerned about the hours of
construction. She asked if that iss�ue �ivi��;be a�dressed during the building permit process.
Hogeboom said the hours of con�,tructiQi�'can�bex addressed during the building permit
process and the City will wq��k��+u�th�;Br�ck at that'time, however, the City's noise ordinance
� typically allows noise fror����am��t� 1�`�m.
'�:� ����� ���,,
Cera asked about th�.next�p���� of the project. Engelman stated that future plans call for
a similar addition to��ie�we,st fo��he middle school.
g � ��t
. 4(�. kS�E.j �# x .�n
Kisch asked if tfiere is��n�'way�o shrink the floor to ceiling space so that the building is
not so tall ���, ,� ;�
_��� f �.
�} Y ;;. �.;:
Dick Stras�bur���Owner`s�Representative, explained that they have been working with
__��
th��r archit��ts reg�=rding the height of the building because they have the same
con�e�;ns. He e�plained that the future phases will be kept at the same height and the
buildings�will ��#ep back" so as not to feel overwhelming. Engelman agreed that the height
of the building�is a concern and noted that the chapel is the main focal point of the school.
Kisch asked about the type of construction being proposed. Strassburg stated it will be
steel construction. He explained that the classrooms will have 10-foot high ceilings with
an additional 2 feet for mechanicals.
McCarty questioned the need to double the space if the enrollment is not expected to
increase. Engelman reiterated that the proposed addition will have small group meeting
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 4
and tutorial space, seminar rooms and media space as well as additional classroom and
lab space.
Schmidgall questioned if it is within the Planning Commission's jurisdiction to question
Breck's design and program issues.
Waldhauser opened the public hearing.
Barbara Busick, 4736 Glenwood Ave, said she assumes construction wi!!��tart in the
summer and asked how long construction will last and if there would b�`constru;ction on
weekends. Hogeboom said construction would probably start in Ju�ae. , �s .
��g; :�.
��,�
Busick asked if there is a process to inform the neighborhood.a�out the�,tim�;co�istruction
will occur. Hogeboom said there is no process however staff,�nrit( ���w,brking,wi�h the
applicant on construction hours and traffic issues. Busick asked if it=would t;i�lp to call the
City with her concerns before building permits are issug�� Wal�c��aus�?r��u��gested Busick
email or write her concerns to Hogeboom. Waldhauser a�l�a �aote�,that there will be three
more public hearings with opportunities for neighbc���s�tt�;��pre�� f�eir concerns. Busick
suggested that Breck use multiple streets for their construction traffic in order to spread it
out.
Douglas Weiss, 400 Natchez Avenue Nq�rth, s�j� he is'�oin'cerned about the building
heig�ht�and his view being changed F���s�id ���rvouldz;like to see drawings of how the
building will look and that he woulda�atfier see;,a three-story building instead of a four-story �
building. �
:; � _., f,�
Stacy Hoschka, 6400 Golc��n Va�11"ey RQ�d, asked if Breck will be required to submit a
� Stormwater Managemen��l��an ���I wh�'uvould review the plans. Cera noted that the City
Engineer will require;Eireck�d�,�i��mit a Stormwater Management Plan and obtain a
Stormwater Manageme�t,Permitw,,
fi
( A
Seeing and hea���� no�p�� els��wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public
hearing � � ��
�z f �; '
���
�S.y��a4iS�e��T a{g, � �
�� � ��� a �'t�������r��a�� ��;
McCarty s��d ���gis concerned about the height of the building. He said he thinks the
pro�osed h+���ht��uld be more appropriate if their enrollment was increasing. Kisch
agre�d, He co�me`nded the design and said it is a great project to move forward on, but �
he wo�rld,like,€�m�eck to push their architect to reduce the height. He said he would also like
to see mor����iculation on the east and west sides of the building. � �
Segelbaum said he supports the proposal and is pleased to see Breck investing in the
community. He added that he is concerned that traffic may increase with the amount of
added space.
Cera said he doesn't believe that the construction traffic will be anywhere near the current
morning and afternoon traffic. He said he is in favor of the proposal and he likes the green
roof and that the footprint of the building is not expanding.
Minutes of the Golden Valiey Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 5
MOVED by Cera, seconded by McCarty and motion carried unanimously to recommend
approval of the proposed Preliminary Pian for PUD 88, Amendment#1, Breck School
subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These
plans were prepared by Holabird & Root and include the following: G1-3 site plan, G1-
9 green roof & ground coverage diagrams, G1-10 overall 100, 150 & 200 level floor
plans, A2-1 foundation floor plan, A2-2 100 & 150 level floor plan, A2-3 200 level floor
plan, A2-4 300 level floor plan, A2-5 400 level floor plan, A2-6 500 level roof plan,
penthouse plan & 600 level penthouse roof plan, A2-7 150 north clas�i-oom�r�novation
floor plan, A4-1 and A4-2 building elevations, A4-5 building sectic�n"s,�,new upp�� �
school elevations and diagram comparing height of existing ch,��el bel[�tpwer �rid
proposed new building. : ��' � �����
�_: , �.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the rr��m� frot� Deput� Fire
Marshal Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Plannin�'�nd`D�velQpx�°ent dated
January 10, 2012, shall become part of this approvaa �� ��� _- ��'
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined,in tfie rr��m�%�,from 1�ublic Works
Specialist Eric Eckman to Mark Grimes, Directar�df`�lannin��r�n�y Development, dated
January 13, 2012, shall become a part of this�pprovaf`�� �� �
4. All signs on the property must meet the r��uir��nents of��ie City's Sign Code. � �
5. This approval is subject to all other st,�#e,'����ra����nd I�aral ordinances, regulations, or
laws with authority over this developr��nt. ` �`��"
` :t � �,; _.;
Informal Public Hearmg �Z �'`ir�g C�.de Text�Amendment—Amending Section
11.70 "Off-Street Parkiri j`�an l;oadin'gz�2egulations" —ZO00-89
f
Ap 'cant: City of G`olde�;V l�y
,�ya..
Purpos . To consii��rFame ding the amount of park�i.��'required for certain
��s ��
� �
�r`
Vidden stated th�#yshe�� died�fhe �ity's parking��requirements in response to a request
by the Plar��in� Cor`��iss� ; to det mine if.���lden Valley requires too much parking.
�� �.: �k �'
� ; °; �
She discuis�ed �er stutly�which �� I ����d�comparisons with other cities and explained that
sta�f is recamsmending to amend arking regulations to require fewer parking spaces
in nir��,of the U�e categories.�
� :�� ���
z .. s a r �� �
Waldhaus�r�asked for amples of',�vhich , operties would be impacted by the proposed
amendments. Vidd stated that h �r study s wed that Golden Valley is on par with other
similar cities. ;
Waldhaus referred to the parkin requirements at all fields. She stated that ball fields
are hea ' used and there may b � complaints about there not being enough parking
spac . Kisch agreed and said cu irently the City tends to approach parking as requiring a
mi � um amount rather than a m ' imum amount. He referred to Walgreen's recent
riance request for fewer parking paces than required because they didn't feel they
cif�j o.f � �=�, . . <
�;
� � �� Planning
� �-���� 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
�
Date: January 5, 2012
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Bryanna Vidden, Planning Intern
Subject: Preliminary PUD Plan — Breck School PUD No. 88—Amendment#1
(123 Ottawa Avenue North.) — Breck School, Applicant
BACKGROUND
Breck School has applied to amend its Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit for the
purpose of expanding the existing onsite building. The proposed expansion will include the
addition of two floors, as well as a renovation of the current media center. The proposed
expansion has been requested by Wendy Engelman-Breck School Business Manager.
Breck School moved to its current Golden Valley location in 1981, after a fire destroyed the
chapel at their former Minneapolis location. No changes were initially made to the property,
with the exception of the construction of a chapel. PUD No. 88 was first established on April 4,
2000, to allow for an expansion to house the educational and extracurricular activities of Breck
School's growing enrollment. Since the establishment of the PUD, no amendments have been
made. Since Breck School is proposing changes to the current site plan, the PUD amendment
process is now required to take place.
Breck School is an Episcopal, coeducational, college-preparatory school which enrolls
students from pre-school through 12th grade. Breck was established in 1886 in Wilder,
Minnesota, with an initial graduating class of five students, and has since grown to enroll 1200
students annually at its current Golden Valley location.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
This request for the amendment of PUD No. 88 represents the first phase of a larger
renovation and expansion throughout the coming years for Breck School. This first phase of
renovation calls for the demolition and re-building of the Upper School, which houses grades 9
through 12. The site is currently zoned at I-1, which contains a height limit of three stories. As
the renovation calls for a total of four stories, plus a mechanical penthouse, with a height of
seventy (70) feet, the PUD must be amended.
The proposed addition to the building will include four floors of classrooms, with the
mechanical penthouse above. The height of the new building is proposed to be 70 feet,
consisting of four stories plus the penthouse. The additional floors are intended to better serve
the math and science curriculum of Upper School students.
Since the horizontal development of structures within the site is limited by wetlands, floodplain
and recreational facilities, the footprint of the building will not be greatly altered. The newly
constructed building will consist of 70,205 square feet, with additional ground coverage of
1,820 square feet, in comparison to the existing building. To compensate for this loss of green
space, the construction of finro green roofs totaling 3,700 square feet are also proposed as part
of the expansion. Also, the 556 existing parking spaces will not be impacted, and no additional
spaces will be created, since enrollment is to remain consistent at 1200 students.
Other proposed�renovations to be contained within the new building include, updated electrical
and mechanical systems, a renovated Media Center, small-group meeting spaces, a greater
number of smaller classrooms, the consolidation of the Upper School's administrative services
and new faculty spaces.
Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson has commented on the proposed plan. His memorandum,
dated January 12, 2012, is attached. ln addition, Jeff Oliver and Eric Eckman from the
Department of Public Works have reviewed and commented on the proposed plan. This
memorandum dated January 13, 2012, is also attached. These memorandums are
incorporated into staff's recommendations.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Amendment No. 1 to the Breck School
PUD No. 88. The proposed remodel and expansion represents a long-term commitment by
Breck School to remain in the City of Golden Valley. Staff recommends the following conditions
of approval:
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These
plans were prepared for Breck School and include the following: site plans consisting of
13 pages total.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Deputy Fire Marshal
Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated January 10,
2012, shall become part of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Public Works
Specialist Eric Eckman to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development, dated
January 13, 2012, shall become a part of this approval.
4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code.
5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or
laws with authority over this development.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Applicant's Narrative (1 page)
Memo from Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson dated January 10, 2012 (1 page)
Memo from Public Works Specialist Eric Eckman dated January 13, 2012 (3 pages)
E-mail from Daniel and Kristen Charette dated January 13, 2012 (1 page)
Site Plans (13 pages)
2
�i�' �� u
o en a e
Public Works
763.593.8030/763.593.398$(fax)
Date: January 13, 2012
To: U�lark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
Through: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
From: Eric Eckman, Public Works pecialist �(�
Subject: Review of PUD 88, Amendment 1 — Breck Upper School Addition
Public Works staff has reviewed the preliminary design plans for Amendment 1 of the
Breck School Planned Unit Development (PUD). The plans are for an interior classroom
renovation and a new upper school addition at Breck School located at 123 Ottawa
Avenue North.
Site Plan:
Due to the significant amount of floodplain and wetlands present on the site, the plans
call for a vertical expansion of the school, and only a small horizontal expansion.
According to the plans, the footprint of the building will be expanded 1,820 square feet.
For this reason, the impacts requiring Public Works review and comment are minimal.
It is staff's understanding that the purpose of the renovation and expansion is to
improve the conditions and maximize space to better accommodate the current student
population. Therefore, parking, access, and traffic management were not considered as
part of this review. If increased enrollment and vehicle trips are anticipated with this
project, additional information may be required as part of the final plan submittal.
Utilities:
As a requirement of the PUD application process, the City requires that a property bring
its sanitary sewer service into compliance with the City's Inflow and Infiltration (I/I)
Ordinance. Records show that Breck School has completed an inspection of its sewer
facilities and is currently working toward compliance. As such, staff recommends the
PUD application process move forward subject to the following:
1. A compliance certificate should be obtained prior to final PUD approval; or
2. A compliance certificate should be obtained before a Certificate of Occupancy is
issued for the building. This option would include the posting of an escrow prior
to final PUD approvaL
Storm Water Manaqement:
This proposed project is located within the Sweeney Lake sub-district of the Bassett
Creek Watershed. The proposed land disturbance (1,820 square feet) is below the
project thresholds listed in the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission's
(BCWMC) Requirements for Improvements and Development Proposa/s, and therefore
project review is not required by the BCWMC. However, the preliminary design plans
propose 7,400 square feet of"green roof° storm water treatment as part of the project.
Staff recommends that the green roof details, specifications, and treatment calculations
be submitted to BCWMC, through the City, for informational purposes only. This
proactive approach to storm water treatment is encouraged by the City and BCWMC
and may help contribute to the implementation of the Sweeney Lake total maximum
daily load (TMDL) study.
Because the proposed project involves excavation and foundation work, the developer
will be required to obtain a City of Golden Valley Stormwater Management Permit and
submit a Stormwater Management Plan as part of its final PUD plans. The permit must
be obtained prior to issuance of building permits, and the developer will be required to
implement construction best management practices during construction.
This development is subject to the City's Floodplain Management Ordinance due to the
presence of floodplain on the site. The FEMA floodplain elevation in this area is
approximately 840 feet above mean sea level. Review of the preliminary design plans
shows that the lowest floor of Breck School is 845 feet above mean sea level, which is
well above the 2-foot regulatory flood protection elevation required by ordinance. These
elevations should be confirmed and shown on the stormwater management plan, and
signed by a licensed engineer or surveyor.
Tree Preservation:
Because the footprint of the existing building is expanding by less than 10 percent, the
City's Tree Preservation Ordinance does not apply to this proposal.
Summary and Recommendations:
Public Works staff recommends approval of the proposed PUD 88, Amendment 1 —
Breck Upper School Addition subject to the comments contained in this review, which
are summarized as follows:
1. The developer must submit a stormwater management plan and obtain a City
Stormwater Management Permit as discussed in this memorandum.
2. The sanitary sewer service must be brought into compliance with the City's Inflow
and Infiltration Ordinance consistent with the options outlined in this
memorandum.
3. Subject to the review and comments of the City Attorney, Building Official, and
other City staff.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
C: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire and Inspections
Mitch Hoeft, Engineer
Gary Johnson, Building Official
C�i ' �� ��� ����
�� ��� ���� �
� ���� �� ��� � Memorandum
�.-��� �a �,. -
��� � Fire Department
�, 763-593-8065/763-593-8098(fax)
�
To: Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Zoning
From: Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal
Subject: PUD 88 Amendment#1 Breck School
Date: January 10, 2012
I have reviewed the PUD Amendmen application packet for the Breck School located at 123
Ottawa Avenue North.
Listed below are the fire department omments regarding the proposed construction site, fire
department access water supply/fir flow requirements and other fire life safety construction
features in accordance with Minneso a State Fire Code and other recognized fire code
standards. A fire protection engineer pproved by the fire code official will be required to
evaluate design and commissioned a required by the fire code official.
1. The current water supply syst m shall be calculated to meet the proper fire flow rating
for the new proposed building ite. The fire flow rating information shall be submitted
to the fire protection engineer nd reviewed by the fire code official.
2. The fire department access ro d and the surface of the roadway shall be maintained
during the construction phase.
3. The design and operation of t e chemistry and laboratories using chemicals shaH be in
accordance with National reco nized fire code standard, including but not limited to,
fire protection equipment, mechanical system and required temporary storage of all
chemicals located in all scienc chemistry and biology classrooms. The fire protection
engineer shall review the abo e information and submit to the fire code official.
4. The design of permanent stor ge areas for all flammable, combustible liquids and
other chemicals shall be in ac ordance with the Minnesota Fire Code and fire code
standards. The fire protection ngineer shall review the above information and submit
to the fire code official for revi w.
5. The staging of construction eq ipment including trailers, vehicles and other
construction related equipmen shall not block or hinder the fire department access
road or access point to the bui ding site.
If you have any questions, please co tact me at 763-593-8065, or e-mail
eandersonCc��goldenvallevmn.gov.
Ho eboom, Joe
From: Daniel and Kristen Ch rette [dkcharette@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2 12 4:15 PM
To: Harris, Shep
Cc: Freiberg, Mike; Pentel, Paula; Scanlon, DeDe; Clausen, Joanie; Hogeboom, Joe
Subject: Breck School expansi n--PUD No. 88 Amendment No. 1
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
We reside at 327 Burntside Drive and w 11 be impacted by the requested (PUD No. 88, Amendment
No. 1) Breck School demolition and reb ilding of their Upper School to a four-story facility.
I spoke this afternoon to 7oe Hogeboom who visited with Breck today in anticipation of the
1/23 GV Planning Commission Meeting.
As we understand the early rendering o this plan, we have no problems with Breck undertaking
this construction. HOWEVER, we will ve emently oppose any permit that allows Breck to begin
construction activities prior to 8AM o weekdays, or 10AM on weekends. The noise and ground-
shaking from this anticipated construc ion will greatly impact 3-6 months of our lives here
on Burntside Drive. It needs to start ND stop at a reasonable hour on weekdays and weekends,
even if this impacts the cost of the p oject to Breck School.
It is very early in the process, but p ease consider neighborhood homeowners concerns as you
review this PUD request from Breck Sch ol.
Thank you in advance for your consider tion of this request.
Sincerely,
Dan and Kristen Charette
327 Burntside Drive
Golden Valley, MN 55422
dkcharette(alcomcast.net
763-381-9660 (Home)
1
� _
� � �� �
• � N w
. �� ,�:� $�� �y - y Q �
�� W.� �_� ��� �� „ � � a ��
�m ' �a� � od�o� ° a 3 � M
. e� > ��� ���� � ����s� A � � � g �� '�^
� Es $ ���� E��x � ^=��: m U �� v
� �� E ��� ���'� � ���`-��'a o '� w`� U '$ z �
• � � �� ��$�� � 8y '� m y � � $
$� ; g
3 ����m ���� i � � ` 6 � fA � �
�
O`
r/ �
V
�
� N
- Z
� O
C�
�
O
_ . --: "r., 31N13AtlZ3H�1tlN . . '
�. -.- ' — � v -�' :-ca-' � - cs'�' (� — aruanr w
� V' —�. Z3H�ltl �
� c�m ���-c#f�cr�Rf- °--S -�<T--�—m--'!��-J � � � � � �, �
� ��' _ _ � �� ° c� � �
�-. � � � ,,�--- ; � � v � o i � v _ � Z
. V U U ,� i V U �
\U ���-I _�0�� i �� . ..0 U u
� � ;i' �GNE.. /'� v�� U V U O 1 U n U
\ f .0 U Q �
1 � U/
. ` \ � � � U U � � I J V U
� \\ /��' J _� 'p � � � �
v �,� • �� � �a
d ry U
\ � `s� � �g Ig �I .
\ t\�\ U ��` � ' U Fa ' L� V
� U
\\ \ �a
� \. �. �`Y' � an.� 1 '
� � � � ci v- ��� 1`\� � � �4 �------------- --�---�---�
{�, u �
\\\ � *"��. , ��%` � U
� \ \ �i7� U . -- �s U (9
\ Y � `= `'\`' V � - _ 3M13AtltlMVllO
\ � \ `�,� m. ��L�J /U U
\ � .` - � � '.'�"7-
�` \ 0 u��1A�,T'�?� n Cl
\�\ y I �O:
\V m�. � w � U �+
��\ � `� . � � m � 1
t,� � V 1
�\ �'bb �� �' � U � . �
\ ° n� yb1!° U I ''S` "' (9 () � (�J
\\ - o U . () I U ei U I
o J � � �
�I � § � � u
�� � � N � a � v � � �
�a � �
.� v �V U U V U U V U / �
ti
\ � U u w �.5� / I ruc�U
U � U (U U�
��� / I �.
. �2� °U U ' �U
< py
� U U � V r_____�,_ �
_�
� . U � � � j�/ . _"__�U '\�� - o ' ..
� � U V � � U Y '�
, w `� __� • UU V�. �V .
. � � � ________� '11I Y � 'U U 1 �U �
� � O � �—._ \\\ 5 1 � � � �
. ` � 'o � U V Q U I \\ 3 I � � � V C:�. w
� \ z I a w�� � �
m ° � � � " � � � � � � � � � �
F �,°� � a �o�� � � � '`, � ,I � � � .
I U
� U I � �\ -� � �.
� r� V /W '
� Z I � 4� Ir 'U 1
I
� o � o � � ';,� �� � .
o r � I i� .' y
� o � �� - � f1 0 �r a • � , i
� � la i/ ��
z ¢r-w �y I'��� '�`' .
� pZ-Q.Z `5 U � JI I��U .
= N - u -�� �
-�-��_S
� vUi O� � D � _...--'�Ud n\��__.��-U IU
�� a h n : �ct���—u�-c�-�°_`°��`°—Li`-`�'—°��c���`?�<�ve,_:�u—�—�-��� o .
cS�—�—.—c3-------
p� �N A � �—��—� � � v'�'� �'�.°.cU���? w . 2
zwa' z � � � I O • � � � gl'
\ o r U � O � I
1� � � Y � I
\ , 9 9 I � � � � �� Y/� .�.
� I g y �W v I
V r � a � � y
� \\\ � I � ' � (� ��\\\� r$ � /
��U �' � � Id
�� �uaa�� I �� /
��:v=� H� I �
✓ U`\' � /
� � Ea' l �c�v �' �
� - �j ���� . � � /
� ���`, v /
p \ U 1
o ° � � � ;��.` ��
� \ ' -�
� ,/ ��
' � � � ', �,� �- �
� _ � � ,
F U/� � \\ /
�\O � \ � U�/ / �
\U � U i, � /
\a f/�y/: �� �
�f � /
� �� ��
� � . s � Z
apNO o e Nin � � � d
� MO��Ot01� \ �� \
1�1i�1�L��aO�nL�� U � . H$
11 II I� 11 II II II 11 II 11 N�
� �� m
Fm
C7 Ffn-- lL 'u5 P'�
Zy w U �
fn K� N �U
ulaa�' Z � .
Wc� �'°-� o ��
zao ���" a
�n=, �no? /
�Zm mmmaa¢ ��
�w N O w w W V W w
LLaZ W�Q-O-'0-'fn2'K
?a��a»>Z�a
ZC7�OLLOOO Z
?�-F-ODUU��_
W x w O��a���a¢� ,
�wxak¢¢aa¢z
�
: ��' ��� w
� �� £�� ��� � � a � o
...�� � � �� � � � d ip Z�n
�^ �+�'+ � � oc 8 � � � �� O� Q�
� $� y '�'&� ��� � °8� � � c� °�5 pO a g Cd''J� �
�a a '^
■ � R ��.�� g U �� � V
� �P. 8 V�� Ez�'g � " m `� �+F �w
� �9� E �j e:��� � C.�ug s g V � �C�
$� e ��� g��� �ao g � � m zga � �
• �R� ` ��� $ �' � � � �, °° o � �� $ P
; ��� ���� � � �
, Sv ;
Z
0
�
U
I �
� \ ;.:.;.;. , �
a-- -�- --- — I w ; � � z
� � � o
� � - � o
� � � W �
G-- ---_ ; - ;- -I � o
� ::': W o
O—- , — , ::�-� ,� z
� � �: � �
a-- - - -- - - �
� ' � : � o
� �
�---- -�_ -- -- - -, �
� �
a-- -- - -
� � �
t� t� i ::::::; �
��- -�- � --- - - - -
�-- -�-� � -- - -�- -�
� s
i � n,
�V- I . I LL
CnC/� _—_ __— _
C�--- --:-� S
�° - - Z
.-M ' � w
II II �
J �- � � � ' I �
� �� � � � � WQ
� °� � f� � I o�
W w� <=
o � x �---— -� — -LL, - -� �„�m
U N TM. I �
� j�
Z
�
�
� o� I I I I
c� ?Z � : � �
� °"' .� j �
L.ZL � J� laj � , � �
O Q J _,
� O�
� �O
� �
Q O
Q
. . . I I "
i �� � � � � � ��
,
� � � Q- '-� - - - -
'\�"_'_ '_'_ _'__ __ ' _' ' ' __ '_ _ __ __�— __ _—- _ — :1..,,.
I ,� ��� - I-—i ::;:.:; �
� � �q ...
Cn CA � . � N � F._{ I .t,,:;,, O
i
� °o i I I i � bo I O � I •b.•.•. �
op � � i :{:'::�: z
� I � � � ;�;,:�;; w
_, I � �--- ---- — - ---- — - .i:::,-' - R
,�l _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ __ —__ _ LL �, I i ';'','� �
, � � � � � � , �� �� ::�� �
�� - - - ----�- � � °° - - --- — - - � � __ '�� w
, , I ., . Z
� o_ - 1--r :;,,.::.:
�� � � � � � � � � ;,,. LL-
� � � � � � � � ...... o
� ��- --��:•r.
, —I ' ' `n
�` -- I - --- - �- �r---- - - --�� - --- � i I '�'�'�'� o
'�� � , � � i �- � � '� o
� i •
� I o �j �p�p ' �i i � '{,;;;:; rn
� I I I °O —- - ��i LP Lp —-— - -I—- �1�:� _
��' —� ---m -- --- - �}----- ±± .r,,.,
�� -- - - o i i � . .
-- -- - I � i :�
,� ° � � � � - (�-- --- - ---- --- - — -�-- :C.?:.; -
'�_J--- - —r— ----— �
n •I•i:•:
� i i � i � � � i i�' i ;�.,.,:,
� ! I I � � I I i i � �1•:•:•:
Q LL j � � i i I 'C•»
,. � � ' ——� --- --— - - ��-- - -— -, - —-- —,-;-;-; —:;...:- -
,J---- � o � � � � :,:.:..
.,_�.�_
-----_�- � I------! -- --- - ' �- ---- ---- ------, �'�-, - :,::;>
� U i i i
, i i ��'�'�'
Z i I I � �� I ...
LL
� I � I � Z I � '� �j:::>:
r' `n � --� — ----- � --' -- � g �------- -- - -- -- � --��— -- ;I;.:,�
�-- - --� — i �-
�; w p w I I :1:•:•:•
� I � I � � � :,<:.<
� � � , '� ,:�>:�
�'� -- --- — - -- ' -- w - ---- ---,,-..: — Z
` I I _ U � --- �-- - -- -- .. J
- - --- --- — l—- , o I :r.�.�.• a
i � I i •1.,;:;: �
z i t :i.;.;.; o
I I /� _ ,�'..� �
I � " I -- I -- --I -I ���", w
� , __—_ _ __ _ _ _— _�— J �—_—_'_-— _ .I.�.�• 2
!___ __— _ ---____ . w C7
�
� i � � ..'.•.'
_� � I
I I � I �... W
1 I J I
I � W 4
� I �4 � � I I I � �^
I � II ' oo' I I ' I i $m
� I � I � S� i I I I i �n-
i i i �� � � i , i i N�
J ;i ; � i � � i � �
i ; I I �' i � � � � �:��
�,:� �� � � CO)�
i � �� q�4 W >
. �� s�� ��� x x Q m �
., d� ..��� �F�'s ��5 �d �op a �tig °o �
. � �V �S$3' y� 4 °_, i '�ia Q J S¢af � ��
� S m ; �j C g�� � � °� � U U' � �3� p' '�1��
, Eq�` � U�.� ��$� � m = �� o� V
Y]� � E g o � Y N� o z
� a� E ��� �'��" � p � � w f('� E J� pt
� N� c �,�8 ���A � ' � � m ° �O Z
3� 3 ��m ���� � € � � $� � oLL �
�
\
\ �
F
� O y
� > U
i �
, � �
a " o
O � a
y
0
w � �
w
J
�
B ' 1 LJ O`
r— r
B �^
8 � J
�`
r
N
. . Z
O
� � U
� - � �
. . . O
�
. . . �
_ ,��, O
��� �� z
�-i
?- ;,---��
i ..1=:
- �,.1�l_ IL�
, . �
. .- .. '__' �lll.,a_�.a�...r:..:.
� 3
0
m
_ �y'`Si
I
�
_ �
€,�;
. - _ V�t-V....."'��,
�i�� ) � �`:L
;�v LJ�,„i 5 _
, . T.. v..._�.�_,-... .. _
_'-.+_�._�'
�
_S �
`'�I
i.
L.—�1
�
��
K Z O �
O � � i�'
f-
0 (�i�
Z ¢ a i �y w
J O _...� 'f�' �Z
O O ` ` �J
c� �a
�Z �n � qQ�s
go � W w��
� w a >o�
c�a aa � oLL�
�
z� z � Z N �;
— l
. . . . — �
� w
w
J
O
�
HS
o Z
J d
Q O 4
K
�� j O r
O u''.�
�
r
i�
• � ��' �� _
� � Y
� �� g �$�, ��� �N �
�� _ _ _ � �
M� WI w.�„�� ��M ��� s3ogh ° � � � a �� � �
' � Y > �� ��� � � �>��s tt � � " " g �� S c�
�� g � ���� � � � J ¢
� �n 3 ���� E��� � '��" m � �� O
� �� � ��� ����-� �g �����o � � w �c� € a
�n g �� ���€g�� S ' � � � z i �
g� , g 5y@ � � � p
• ; ���a ��w0 � � � m � LL � e
Z
O
�
U
�
�
�
N
❑ o� Il—J ���_ I � �
I
( ��b��� � � � � �
i w � i i i i �
---- , - , -
lmnaaom �
� . � � Z
i � � ,i: � i �� i I i
- --- --- �I ------ -��--- - - I i� I- --- -I -(�----
I
--- � '----- � '----- �� '---- �
,1-----. 1----. C----I i-----� � I
�I I �� I � I '
� � x� � � � I
I I aao I I I I
�
ti F
� 3`g'
"'"'�_____` '_____�__'__• N '_""'�___'J, ."""__�'__ "
I I ��� I li I —I
_ —_--__ I� __
�'I ------ -i Y--- - - j j; �i--�--- -�
� � � �
, , , � , ,
�---------. �-------,. .----;----: �
'___ .._'____' I I
_ _ � _-_-_� :I I J "_"1"_'ii . I I I
I I I I
!�I I �; I �; I I
� - -�------� .; ------ -�----- oe- �--i- ---f--- - - --
�
� I
I I� �
.
� � ---- ---
� ----; ---- ----.
,
,f- ,- �y � ,; -1-
b I I� � _� 1� � I
- -�------�; �� — ---- -��--- �°- - �--I� � --- -� - --
-.� , ��_�
, ,
� , � � � „ �
; � : � �
� � . .
,
� -- �I----. � ---I- -- = �----I---'' '-----�- : � I
--- � � � � , �
� -- ,
.
� , �
O > IQ ' 4_ � I_____' "_____!_____' �___ _I____�' I I
'.� � � li � I �
_ ___——— —_'__— _�r_—_ _ _t—--�—I� _�f___—_ ' _ —_
I i I 1� � I
i � � i
� � � � � ._'_'_ ; I
o �
' .-----} ' �___ _: ; � i; ; �---- -� -—
- ------ —�--------�---- - -T-�--�� ---�--�---
I '
I , � I
� , ,
, � w �-- --r----,. :--- -t- -� �
::I � I � � I ; I ' I
e � I
� a
�
:� __, � . ---� ----, w �.-- - ----�. � ,
- :�-- � j ,' ' I
- ------ ------ -�------ - - -Q--,� ----r----- -I - —
� . , �
,. , , �
a � , � ��
, ,
° ---. : I i, ,----}----;
b• 3 � i � I
'----I----' ------I- , ,�
i i i i
- ----- t------�----- - - -�---i- --�------ -� - --
� � � ,, � I �
� , ,
. :---- ,. �-- -�---: � I
�I I 1----I I
_ , , , , �
� .
-� ;-----
.-- ..f ---; t- --, .---f----�; � �
: :,
� � I
- ------ � ------ -�--:--- - -�—�� ----C----- -,-- --
� , --
, � .
, �
�
, , � � ;
� � , ; ; : , , � , �
�
a �----�-----� �-----�-----. . � .-- -----
o I I � w i I
, � I
= w3 � � -- --I --- �
3w � I a�c I I I
- - -�� -- �--------I----- �N ---I—i ----�--.---- -� - ---0
ag . � � LL� � � � �
� � . � �
� � . . ,
M =., � ' I
�z :��I I zp I i .: "____}"'__' � I
o° � I
~ ;I I I � �
a
_�° `� I � ! � ' �
�
---- �r-----, ;-----f-----; , , .-----,-----; I �
� � , ,
. , . .--- --
__, �
, ---- ::, ---- -��--- - -- t - i -�-�----- ' -� - ,=-
� ,
_ _ . -� �
, . , � , � � �
' � � ,
� � ; � �-- --
' ' I
, � I , r i , � �
� � � ---� �----+ - - �I— ' �
�-- -- -----�
� � , = _ �
� �
irvrn Mwm
' . , . ,
I � g
- ---
I � I a
O
i i i I � �
I I -- I �
r i i I i o§
I I I i + g�
, � � � � ��
� � � � � �
.Z"RZ S'.L6 .9"�81 .H".tf
b b b b ° b
� � _ ^
• �� � �
� �
• �� g ��:�' �g� 'h y � _ � a
=� �I �'-=�� ��� ��� �� o g o o a �
>- � 5 ��o � � s � �� °o N
� 8m Y r �S g�g � :h�8ge S� � � c� d O �� � N
� �x Y � ��� gm wi�R� _ �, W
$� o ��� �'2g�Q� .g+� ^=��F m Y �> > �
� �^ D � a. �'8°� � �����o '� �`' W '� O� e
� �� ; ��� ���� � � � � � m � °� r �
Ss s ���g ���5 z� -'$ � °
s
Z
�
�
�� o U
> J/�/
y i W li.
�� � �3 y
°° W �m Z
��� „ � „ a� � �� O
� N ~ �z
�� __
N�= w�
-- , �_
w �w
� g> �
� , ° gw�y � �
p -< ^< �� �e�� < w�g� ,�
�N
��
_� `� -----o�o= �Q a �o H
� ---- --�--- ----, ---, --- �e �- , LL- 1_ �
-----
----- ---- -_-- �
__ _ __�
LL — , ., . , � ��a �No
> ; �_ �, ---u, , �---, I ; - �_ � - °< �w= N o=
- i y ti �s I I � $�,, n�,'�, _ „ w� ��o�
o ^ _ • � < I ; "' '--- __ � _ �,�_i �i �""'�g ��
,: __�?e
I i �° �� z
-- ----- � Q - �� � --- — __ �-- �$ - �'��" �:� 8
; _ o� _ i �1-t� o�;�� ; - ; i -r!_ w �%=�i�U
� � :
�
; � , .
� .�< r i ' `"--'-' � /�� ma A b��u��c
� _o�•-_ O `'___' I 1 �I I 0 � i �"i/ � 0 N o m w m a
� � I _
I
_ r, _ �----- --' � , Z
� , w �--�--- ��
.
; i-," K P `.�y� �,--- - - -------�-� 1'r=t) w
� " _'___� �3 '_ __ I -� 'I ��1 '�n, '� Y a o 0
� �~ - - - ,'� � � O � � ' ' ^ }�%
� - � � , — 'ti3 �� J��(
� I `-i �' ���q_A� ` -_-___ i .' /Q 9•�l ; ; I ' 1\ V �
^ � 'i
w y�.__ \.I'\� y
ww � --.-.__�_'_;. I� w� __!___ __ __ ___ 1 I I 1 1 1 � � �
o� 1 �`'' i �� �ca� � � � _ � � ( �
��� ; --�_�---� �-� �y �==r�_:. o��o � ; _�_, � i �.--� �.-_� �--� ��o � � o =p
o$w ; =� �'=' e �' � ��_ � ' - - °�i ; <�--��i� �y _=� << "�' g � o �o
, Q � � " �j� °� ' � � - �' -— � � a 4
� ��
- -- ----- � � - _ � -=f---- ;-- --i oi e � � o � � ��
1 � `"�T" 1 -..� � 3�i
- - ' ���rrn __ � a I _____ o I � �� � � d � i}� LL vi o Z
Y' „ o� � �1 �-� I � r� ,� \\ / �¢ W � � �x
'_ �-� � � w�`-- ° t�t� {sr� O� i �-� i � `i--`------t-Ti-------�' i s o w � a�
. ,
m � _ _ �
> � � I
<� , 6_�` "a� I I � � �S � 1 .�:.:�w}:.7":.. °o Z „m o P
m ° ' ' a _
� � i
� '
� ,fi � �� °
i { � -- .
(�, 7, I
. . �� �� Y+ � �e�Y� � S T i T "S T � � 'a � 1 a � � �_
� _
- '� o �9 V
- i ---- .--�' ±�:-, � ---- ------ ----- ------� � w `� 3 -
,
� � s � _�__ __—; ^ . I -! +— ----(�}�i—- -i i - — w � s ��
^ � e � IJ-- - -- --------'------ - ------�----� i � I<�- � c9 � _ �
N� � � � � s
o ��. o t � --, �'_ .� ,
e �, _ � ��`,� y.�� �
' �' �-- � � J � � � � i � i i ' �
C °� _ __________ _______1_� _____ 1_____ � I � 1 � �.J- `�._ -�
r ° I -- � 1� - �__i _ )__�Li _—_—_ _— � ��
� � 1 - - - ___>_
/ I ' �T'___T�_� T�� m ���r__i_'_i- � 4 j. �_��j I '� I ^h,J^a'� '^ I I $
�—ti m '_
. � I m " ' �o
a ' > ' �t'_'�_ � I I � � '° � ' " "1'_'��r�' 1 �"�� I i�'_'�__"��_/!.._ �a LL 9�
+ +
�+i
' '_ ^ __ + � � �
� � - _ � � �;�� {� `�i"..�"i__�' 'E3� 1 �` I 1 n�I � I 9 I%, N� � 3
' A"AZ � �� I � � � 1 �"'T___i{i
' � � j� I ts �-.ii �-`_'.a."i-_._'�3� � � �u:�:�C��i:
' T T + __ "___
�
�' a I _
-. ...-�
�� � � '^'`.��, "w�' "�,^� a'� � --- -- -_3_ _i__r�;�� I � ' `�'c _ � _ �
- -— —- -—- � =�=--=�'-�:-�--`��� � ���,F _i � g�
� 8 � - --�-�---' � f- � � ' ,
� ' �-� � � . � � i
' ' �+ ,yy
� �/^(� F-e�cFaa �� I'--Y.. + �'�3� I � Yj h m � '�� � � �i� � `_ a (�-�t� c+
_ ___ _______ � ^�._ �� y �� 4� � 1 J� �_ _�� __ �_ ' � � .
��_�^'°""^� �T�-�_�'_1'_{�3� -r- , i —��L i i i �.e
i �_� •Tir —v" �`"9 w� `-�- � � � ��
�, 1 �I FF3 ki ki k3 �.y}. " _ __ _� � I 1 ' I � I
- 1 ('}-{� n +_`__1"'i�_ „ � � a � " I
i Vv .v� 1 � __��1 1 0 1 � \ �!___' �
b . 1 _ � � � �_� � $ 1 ;_f__;_"_y, i I a
, ��__==? �_�_; �_=__� i , , �o , ; �� �,_�:�_, , i �LLQ
, , �-� , � � -�� �� �
, :_�_� LL---. , , i ; ,._��_r:._, �_.-----r
i � � �; -r[r��.d;-- �
�� Q �---� U LJ �--� � w� i O � � i � 7`� ' �
� ._,,�,_�
� "'____^ ' � i � T""_r > 1 _�_ � J•�j8` 1
n a .:ik8_.
_-__-_- .--t._�__ C��� 1 � �1 __- _ - �
_ -__ � �_� �— -__ � -t�i�i..� � _ - (�
.; i 1 F��Fi Fi„�,_,-�F,�,�j � � �L��e !h_�JF� ___i_ ____� gy�
-�y � _''" LL'� y uT-'^J $y I �}� 1 t�/gb �Y-� F 1 `�� � � �� t� ' �I 9a
.`°, ' t �`'�
.i t=it'i' ki ki _t3 k3_ n � �1>'_ ,- - --
______ � —�_'-�:J i�3 —r- -—fl� — �
=1 -- � 4-�+ FyF� F��� ��Y �-�O� i I ` �, ' m w�
_. - 5�.0 1 tl[�j'I �J 4°�Ji �J Vy �� 1 ��'°� ; � I��r ��\\�6/�„=�-[�� I I �
f`'._ �w� i "__^ 1 Ej ti� t ti!i I �I 1 �h � 1 1 �__'�____�__"'±__'__y
� t_S `*'I �'N � -� I � -�-�-�.�"��:�.." I
"{; � I ' :�; ,!C i �_� � ,r �
e
� � � �'.�..��.. LL�
, L
�
�� r*: m r,. .1' �� dl-' � �� �°1 i
.- � ,;, �� � ,a� � a � a
_ `b ,; -_�- _-_-»�__-__- - -
��m � I !t, i+� '�� �+� ;"«�� � _ �
- ----- � �i- ��� �+� ' � --- -1-a --_--- —_ ---'y h - �j �� --�_�� � �Q
— ,_` � �. ' :i:-T;� � i i , �t-T-t; , � i;
�� i � �� � y � ; rr-tr-?� �
� [A7 �a � ' � N� 11_ I _ i i Wlsl I I � II i{_i_}� F� 1 Y'
f � Fi�,.� Fi ^ _ _ .� ��i '��' {-;"';
� „� m;�` r„ � i _ i � -i--r ��t_7 �T___� � II -i_'r li� i
e � � �� ti'.�� v�. �.�.� ��. � � o � �.r
p,�°'� � I � � � i � ��
� tiJ /4y ltJ.e.�.Me'__�� c =r��v� '' I� � F; _�_ 2 7 y 1 I L
�$� � � � kj ti3 °r� � � - ��1 -�� � - �1 \ I - 2
_-__ ____�-_� _1�L�p� ' - -� 1 �� L �� � 1 m 1__ .�. 7 -�_
b ' � V, O I � 1 N 1 � ` � ��
r �'
� 1 � 1 � II � � I
1 I O I 1 I'I
� �
� ���, ���� ����� i i -4----------`------=----;
� `V ti" "�' Y' '4 S"i °a �� -'"�'-.:^�:.� �
� w�'� �°.�+� �+"''«°i � w�'1 � I Y 1 �� Z� s l C�'`C.'.�.7-.��,. � �� ��
� 'r' 11",,' .'�w' I O � r-_ I � _�_____T_____T�__,_-'_____; .n
� � � � � - ;^-�.�LZ��.�: �i �
�a �`��� �`��d ����' �� � ��C�'��: ��
� - °� � I � � �{ ,Sr� � �� � ,I —
---------'�j �- - - ' ' - - - -� - - - �
--T
` LL ���� _�___ �__�_���__W_ _ �_ _�i__ _-� �� A.6
_ � o � � � _ li
8.- O� 1
�< I �� '` I � � — g
i � - --- - a
_ i
�
� i o
� rl � ` __� , ' I o
�o aYq �� �� �� '— - - --- ------- 0 I — � >
�U'w� ��(�N� (�h� ��-� � J
I � o � �
I I �4
, � 1----- � � � o�
� , n , ��
i , , _ � �
� � I
�irn.o-s '�'rna-.e
i � i i i
.z-,ea .9-,u .e-.e� .e-ta
.Z-b8 . .9-,LE
V p p W
a m
� � _ �
• `� �� �� �
��� �y w
. �� g ��:€ �m� �q x x
• dn } •,�� ���g d.� ��.o o ad o o a �� Z
� am YI r ��� ��� �g$X� 3 � � � � s� � M
• 6ti � � � ��,�� � ��_�°_- � � � Q
�� �^ g ��.w ��. � ''`f' „ ' � �m o
. �� p "�� '���€ � ���c�� � a cYi �� w
�� � ��� �€ � ��a�o g � . w m > � o
• �Rn i ��� �� �' � � � � m $ Jo � �S
$� _ ��g �'��a 2 � � � g s °
�
g��; � �
�UO� V
W°�� _
3��� y
wWy� Z
a� �
��°a V
� ���o� �
W w°w O
o �MN�°
Z " °��
Y e °� � � ¢ � H
--- � � i 0
- - --- „ . ,
°;
- _, " Z
K Z {^� '� ' a .f. R ...� � .��.
r� . 1
/� �� I ���r
0� ? \y' /- _ ____ -�-
�--�-�r____'�
LL O 1 1 ___'��l.ri��=.�'�'�iLI�i i'
K d I 1 � �.��..� f I� g�
O W �
LL� � i � ----------tr�---�i-� �
�� � � � --�,�.,,-�C 7�.�'
Q-'LL I I 1. u� �
� � Fi�J
�w4 I j �° �
�2' + i.' � " I $ kj L u
� �_ :X � � .� j�_C�^��_1,d.:tL_V��C� I
7.- , -- `'___�_____�___".�"__J
V w p o i � �
> `�._,... -' -�
� `=r,==-y V='=-� �
�w - �_:''-"'
'----i--- -� �
N w i ry-'-.�- - ��
J� �1 6 � �
Q� �" N � I .�. \
r
�g — — — --- ----- —
Z� � �s �� �� �� ��
m � ,-'g� �
� � om �
- �� ,%��. �w � �� e� e� 00
� o
-�-=a '/�i .o;- --- --
i���_ I ti� �
' ' -i— —��-,�{^'�— —
I� _I I I, � I ._'._C�y�_�y ���7-.'�:�_., K e
•`_ __ _—_ .•ti,����r�=l=�J- � � ��
� — �
� �
� __'_.�____"� `_"__
� ;� o \\\\\ I /�g 3� R � 1 I ^i�
� � �\ ',� om `<
' �p �,J j\� �� � 1 � �/ I
. .
a � ww
« \ o� 1 �
� �
� � � �' � ��� � - --�; 'r_,.-,=,�.
a �$ __ �� --- -�.K 'R: '
-ea�/-- -' - - —_—_—"TJ_,-
� y_� �� � � �_ a
o � �~ g - �:.�..:. �� C.t�:. rb °s?
a ,
. ���W I _-`/) I i� --_ Vl` _ _ I�csi
+ �p ���1\ / j -— � �Q '
p
':� �� / � N=+-`f'� I
' .' \ /�{ $� __'__i F'""_ _____i p
` m `\ � p m u-i.�i 4i.i-F�1 t��J p
�/ I �
� / � � 1 l �R
�
� / ♦I o f'..,u F_'•_•_i i 1r-��-'��
^� � �� ���. � � �'--l-J'
� � i w�
p�� `. .'na�-- ---
-�-;, —/,%\r I -}-- —-°' ----
�
.� I �
y, `
I I j � �� �i I
�i I �,�i� 'y,) i h � �� ? ' g-?-?,
_ '�'.' -�___ y/ __ _�{'a.�-- ! -��,
/ �
q �• , ,� C�-�-{' :i,;-r� ���-f' �a
, U
j� `• g� ��_�_r �'t�i_�; �a_._�
��\� om „ I
, v.
�, i �. �� � �
a _ ,' I ` � i
� � ��
wq I�
a � -F' \ � � I
..__ � ---- _ —�,�T��T�
�� i - � -—- w�-`-v---�-, �i-''"��'� o
�,, ----- — , � o
,; � �° � ; �._�.:�:; r=�::�.-- g
w� , P,
_ ��
�i N , '
�----�------.' �-=--�----� �
�I ; � � � = �
-- -- � ,a � �,
��''' -- � - ---
� N -
� o -- � — N ---�
. '
� � rn � � �
----- -------- � , �
� � _____ ___�' ___
� � i �� � i ..'��... ..��c^�'.'��
� , ya i ;� i ----- ----'�� -----_�---, g�
� ; , � , ��:�r_:_; �;:_��:_�; , �o
' '� � ���•.::.•'.. �'t�crt�•:"
�._� � �°� `
- --+ --- �- —�--
i
_._ �= � C) Q] �a
----- -
b �r , -� �
.�,�� �� � iC7 L] C3 C7 CJ �
°- ,I o � - �
=-_ �
z
� li �� � � - - - � 5
� � � � � � � � `$ �
' o
� � � � i I �i o
LL
I � � � � �� � I I W
�
<v b 1 ': -1 � j�t
_l � � '
—" 1 :�. i I I.. I N e
' � . �� ' � , I � N�
I � � I
i '
i � ` � i i
�
� I .0".� � .9'.Lf w
i � d
n 0
� � 1 I �
1 I
��
� �� � ���' ��� �q - - w
( �� a �
=� y ..��,� ��� ��� �oqQO o � o�e � a ;°
� g&m Y � � 53 �o �z�o" a a -i �� d �
• fi� •� � �gE ��� � ��g�8 � � � � � oo a� � N
N E $ � ��.R c��,� � `"'^ m N �� � Q
� �� P ��� a:�g� � �c��°c� � Y �� �
— � „�_ $ $ €' c� w
° �� .� �`a � —��'ac � � � w �
� g� 3 ��� $���, � � � � � °° � ° � �
��� ���� 2
O
0
H
�
� �
H
0 2
� O
f
a �
Z gs �e � O
Y � �
>,�i$� �a a N� � �
`s � 1 "` � '`------- I-a I
, , � o, .
�� .. ::
�Z � .- �. �:�:�:�:�:�:
gLL --- ------- ------- ° _- - - --- - -- �,.�;;�:.:
LL� � � ' J I ' �
� �'���'���..•�'�'�
�� I I � 1 I � ;.;�;�'
�LL I I I I I 1
m 0 � .'.'.'.'.'.'.
wH Y � ���' N�m ' I 1 ..
_ � .......
�
�� - ' y �oa ::. ......
J� � a . ..
�_ _ � - a " �� ' -- --- -----------� ��, .;;�:::;:;::�::
, _ , , J� ::•�:;.:•;•::,:::
U W � � —— . . .
?� ^ � � � � � N I � ......
�C.J
� � �p au.o-.�aae.en'��:<>?>.
u~i� �, � �-L,7 � 'a � 4� � '•'�'•'•'�'�:�:�:
�� c •..
a~ --- - e ----- - ---��-- - - -- --
LL �:�,�,
00 s °a a �� r� :�:1:�:•:•:•:•:•:
O � i (
z� I .o a� _� t� t� �� I 1 1 I `..,...
1 I '•'`'•'•'•'•'�'�'
- I I � � I .•.h•.•.•.�.•.•.
°o � ��� �1 I
�_ I I - �" -�° -- --- --�---�-� -----� , y � � --- - '::::�:::;:
� � , , � :..:
-T - --- , , �t ::::.:�.
S��p,� , , `
E- �i � I &i I 3 �'`" I 1 1 I '�•l'•'•'•'•'•'•'
I E � I � � LL I �� ' 11 1 � :;.�:::::::::::::
1 1 '�'�•�'�'�'�'
1
--- - � - � -i- -.�.-�.-"�� -��--I ----- , -, ----- ::::::::-:::
� , $ , , �, , , , � :::�:.:::::::.:.:
� „
y� 1 1
e ' % � ��� �I �og� � � � � � �, �:{:;:':'�':�:�:
',Qg ' � z�� � � 1 I � �:V:•'
J y I d �(�} I 3 ' . .'.•.•.•.•
o � ¢ I I� �' L--7' I __'___'� 111 I' I ,..,.,•,,'•.•
1 I
_ _ _—_—_ �. I -� �_ I _—_ _—_T____ � 1 1 � _— :•:t:•:•:•:•:�:�:
— _ _ _-1— _ I _ ...
, �8� � � � 1 ' ...
y � 1 1 1 I J- �.�':.
b �� I I � � � �� � � o �;•[�;�;•;.;%�;.
� � i i �o 'au.o-.�aaa.w��
1 I 11 0 �
-—_ _—-_-—_ I �'._C?,r'_'Luy;_C,y:_C'7. � � ""_ ___ _ ; -�-I i -�_o z _—-— ::�,.:�.I�:,.
I r�zi___�_'Ll.�___'_..__F"�, I �_____�____° l� I ti 1 11 ¢ � :..
11 �, �� �.".'.
T ' i / i ' � ��i 1� a I j 11 O I � �.�.�:'�.•.'.•.
� :}_+ ' �_�; � ; __ F-{; o� 'LL � � i i �� i � :;i.:;.�:�:�:�:
i � � � i � aR I I � �1 '�o t�.•r.•.
� � `I �r 13 ,,��T� � � I � � 11 �w I ;.�...•�.':�.•.
$ I m' i I 3 _� I ; I j I 1 i-' ..
m� ,�1 I s I` r'0 F_{;" i ; � i "!ii I '.�.'.•.'.
x '� z •
_—_ __'__ —__}�_ _ _—_ _1—� jJ ----- ,�',
0 1-� __-" '_ ; 1 � I 11 �i I �.1.•r.�.
� `{ ' i � 1 1 0 ':•r:
- �� y � � � :; � ,, � ......�� 3 ' I , f _ � T �.�����.�.:...:.
--- -------- � `}-` -�',F:�;u-i -1--------�---- �--� -- -- ��:F;�:��:..
�I � i i i ( � I 1 I .�r:�:....:.
i �}i ��1 ___-�__ � 11 :�i:•.•:•:•:
T � O � i ,� � �'��•'•:•;•;•,�.
b I �}-{ `�-i r�-� `-___.�"".i � � '� .• .
8� � �' I F I I 1 I � ::`.;:::��::;:..
$�� � `;_, ��_, �-' O � ,F_f, i i i1 i '•I'.
— — -----�� — --- ---, �ti- — --- � --- ,1� I --- ,;�..`_"_`.;.::'•.•
— y �, , �� , � � _/ t� � � ��� f.......
I , ' �r r / I I ':{:�.�.�::�:�
�&� i - +-' e �-----T-----� � ... ,
� i �fi- ��,�.�'� � ° � �����:-��-i'� ' ::�:;:;:;:;;:;.
s --� � � ;:�, � 3 1 d o •
�}-i ��-i �}-i o au.o-.�aaa.w��d��:;:;:;:;.�:
� `' ' `' i :t ; I I o � �� � � :•.r::::::::::::.
-- ----- �-�f�-�11�— —� ----- � - -- � ---- k • --
1 � ' °< � TI:.:�::^�:
� ��_. �_, ,_, '° � s ; � ----- � � •;t:;:;;;�:�:�
�°� � � 0 i i E '•
�s� .� 1 1 g I � I ,'1;.�.�.�.,.'., Z
� r�i O � � 1 � d � ''�.'.." �
1 OR � � I Q'
I �#'i ���+r�3'�/ � I 1 � �'�'�'•'�'•'• O
I 6 i I � I I I ''�1.....'.'. LL
. i i�`- 1 i ' ' —�— J .
__-_-- _—J. y-{ l.� ` W
-_- �� ,�i-rtTi-1� � J I � / 1 ___ •.�•.•.'. w 4
� i i i 1 ' i 1 1J � __ I � I a .'.1.'.'.'.;.,.'. o ��
� `�i� I r}i f}-i `}'i - __ _�_ -' � I I. `... .
a a ti_� `{_i i_i u�i 1 / 1 y '�`�'�'�'�'�'�'� r`�
a � r—�r—�i � �
I
i i i i i �
N ?,5 o�.. o I I pN I I
s
'a I �� g��-`�I?'A Q� i�� �R .c-� � I `a I I
� � I�a
i i i i i i
� .Z".BZ � .Z'.Z9 � Al•dl � S�.IE I I
Q � S"bB � . o � �
w
0
• � �' �� �
• �� -Q= �y W
Z �. �� � �
� �"r� � ".'` ���' ��� "�o 0 0 � � � a �� Z
I n J
• Y � ��� ���� � ����$'� � � � � ° `� � N
. �E: ' ��yp t� � � � g a
� Y� 8 ��5 F�' '� '� ��c�,Q�� m fn �� LL
, �� Y ��Q ����i' �i`�'�� E W W `U9 E �l
�^ -O � � � � � a' m W e �
� : ��g ���� � � � � � m � � � �
3s ;
�
�
s v
� �
w �
� � �
� � , z
� � o
w ��� �
� oo� O
Z ° �
r � �
Y � O
z
�
N
h Q I m uS y
Na 0Q
'� I
1 ���� �
� � �al � � °a C7
0---~ -—- -—-—-—- ---—- - r ' ';',','' P ' -—
\ '.•.•.'. �Z
—� �— O O
i t� ' ' I ':�:,:,: �I �a
fl ' ' ' �� 3 i � ''�•'''•' o w
� F_{� F_�� � � � � � r�W.•.•. 1 LL,�
�P7 0." K LL
� I _i_i i �� f-{� 1 I � •,••�•j, I
} .'�T.'.' m 0
�_fl F-{�i � w
I � ,_.i i - I 1 •���•'•� W HQ
�'-" ;h L�-; F-}i \ � � � •:,W'.•'.•: �K
o F_{, F_�, i 1 1
ayo - � i � _ �-}� --- - .. :::::::::::::::: i �_
� � � � . :_}� � . � � ��
�� � � ,r � ;�:;:`::::::::: �>
�W
� � o � �U
I R� � I � i ��
i�� C'.•.' J� .
Q H
o--- = --- --_-- - , - - — , -, --
LL
-- LL� � � i z�
I •'•'�;:;:::
i `�=�=�' "'4:::::•....•. i
��� � 0 �°�:�:�:
�o� � �.�.
� -- -- m � ::�:;::: �
�N ,;�.. _
�--- —- -— n I :.g�:�:�: `�
w =
��o � � � wo
a-b �as � � � �
°�--- - --��--�.- � <<' ;,�-' r�' — n - - --
�o� i __ � i � t_{� F_�� ;_}� u i :�:;>:;: i
�a �� � i � -��,_ � �� n i ::�.:.d:..:.
% � Y _ ,�r u ..u.•.�.•.'.
°� � � � W� , '.Y.'.:-... I
u i, � � j
� � _ ; ; ; ;� �-�i ���������:': I 0
F .��/v/ .�..•.• LL3
��� � � h-�i F-Y� F-{� � T � 'w.'.p.':'. �
--�;t�;�}, ���.;.�...;.
�_ _7_ _�_ _—_—_ _ _— .
� � I
o � .•...':•.•.•.•.' '�
o-�- - - ------ -�-�- a�:.:.��.:.:.; -, --
� ��o i N � ::::::::::�� �
� _ � � .�:.:.:.:�:�. �
�qg
� �� ' � � --- a �............. i
, o � o ----------- ..
� � _ --'" ° � a ' ':'��:''' '
u 3 .•.�y.•.'.
o-- -- � � _ ... _ --
_, _��- � n .���_ �_ o �:�.�::::::
, i —,, .� , i a....; ,
��� � I t "�, �° � �:�•..•.
r , p �:��;•>'•
� � �i I �l�_ 'h> � I •:w�.�.�. I
o--= --- -�--�- , � - �- � — o � - = -� --
,
��t:r �
I � 3 $ I
� 1 1 :.....:.
I 1
o Q _Il_ I � � '�:�.'.�
_ � :��.:.;.; � U�
$ � [;� , ---�a---- - ; ;� � :;.�....:. �
� �� �3 ,.���'r I
g3 � �1Cir�v. �` J ��:::::
a-- -—- 5. . ,- �2� - - _° _- - _ .s.;.:. _ -—
�.��,--�r— .�:�.•.•.
?'1' ce71�"�y `d w� � I �
m` ��� � � I I
�_ _ o =___- _-___- � ��'�;:;: c �
�
�� �'a.,.,.>' '�
-gL'�- - -----�- -� �� �
�s � �
�� U � � i _ " ' - -—
1 I n,�
� 1 1
� � O � � I
I $ 1 �g I � I
og 1 r� �•��'��• Z
� � � I 1 .•.n.'.'. g
,�1 � � � 1
:�:�''�' a
P.'.'.'
�- � ' O � 1 � ''�•'•'•' I Q
_ al I 1 � .�.i'.•.,. �
'-_ III � �� � � I •.'�.4L . �� li
� �ul � � � P'�'�'
i '
� t Y 1 '�� �..... _ _— >
!, _ -__ _ ( 0 1 0 ����_���_'_ '_ I 1 � .'.'.'.•�.'.'.' W 4
� o � m�y, �; L JI = i po
s�� I I ¢ 1 ,a.�
IQ � I ��
I 1 - ��
y f ' ��� � � �
!� I I � `a I
i � y t
.Z•,5y .B".l9 ./"Rl
.2"�69
Q m U 0
� �� _
• ; �� - ;
� gs Z ��� � �� � w
' - 3 °� �x � x x � J
8� �I �xr � � ��� �� o � a �'v gg
' w ��� �' yg b�'�o� ° �3 � a �� gwa CO
� #$' Y T� ��� ��� R � g ffi o : � u Z t� � O a� LLQ� N
• O; E g�� ��o$� �t _>_�°,� � �' oa� a
�� �� $ ��'� E � � '''�� Po m Y �s ��tW
� �,�, E �='Q ���� 0 ����a� � �5 w '� W O O
�n °e ���� � � � � � � w��€ g
• 9R � ��� ����� � � � � � �' m e °wws �
Ss ; a �z �aay
��� ����
3 � � O
�=a � w � � N � H
�o � p o �� V
°�� � � �
� � ° � � o o� �
� ���y < `� � s � wo �
a ° o� ° � � F—
d�m- LL �
� � yw " � � < � w _ �� _� N
ag s �, � ia
� i�go 0 00 � �� a o � > 6 g ? � �i ° � � 3= O
� °_�� &� �� � �� g � � � = g � g 8� � .� ° �° C�
Zc+ rc a i s o W a � 3 U N
J iorn� Q� 00 O �e t/j O
� � �� U » g0 m � ❑ � J � � � � � � 6— �
2
z °�$`� g� __ > �t � � � � ~
w
� « � �, � �
Z
� � I a a� I I I � I
1 I I I I I I
_ __ "�I
1
1 I ' I � 1 N i
°p o
--- -------1-:� �,5 - ; -- ; -- o-� -�----�- - 1 --
� � � � , � � �
I I ; I ; I I
� _ � , � , � �
N I I � � � I � I I � I
I I � _ � I I
I
'dA1.0-.L tl3d.0/l3dOlS �
I --3 �I I m 3dOlS
I I �I I � � � I
I w II I N I
--- I ------- I —�—� — �-- -- o--- —i----- o .�--i --
b
, , : � � � � �
- I I = ��0 I I T I
, � _ - � � � ' —1
--- ------r oo �- - --- -- o-- -�—�---- - - --
I I I b I � I
-- ------ -- o—� , ----� --
, , - --- ,
I I �c : I I
i i i r � i i
I I I b I I
� � � � I ���$ I
___ _—_ _— _—___�__—`_ —_ _ _T — _�_—_ E— —_
. � I I I I
b I —� b"� I I _.�__ _J .
_—__.�——___ _—
_ -- --- —�— -- � I o--- � I -- I --
�
� . � � � �
. ' b I 2 I I LL 4 R I I
� ' � � S x� �
--- � ----- � ----- � - �--- � � ----� --
I I I - � �
, , a � , � ° �
--- ----- -- --- -- a--! y--- - --1 --
-1—�T �o,s -�—�
� � � � � �
_ i I ��$� I a I W �
I I I I I ^ I 3 m d I
�
_—_ I __—_—__ ' —_ __ — � —_ �_ I _— _ _ _ I __
_ _I__ T1
, yw0' � � �
I au,a,�a��aaois I I
z i � �
I I � -I
i
--- ------ - - - - � -- � a-- -I------ - -� -- g
_ � _ �-� � �
, �, _ � � a
� � ~ � � �
W o
� �
� � I u0 � 3 ` `�' I N
� I I g I � �
I � _ _ �
� a =
� � � � � i � Z
� I a � —J w
-_-L. J � - -- g -�------ - - -- W
J
--- W
__-_ I __ ' oo __ ______ I W§ f I J 4
I I I J O:�
N �� I T I ��
I
� � � �Q I � Nv
�
I � � � � I I
I I I I I I I
� I I I � � �
��� � I I � I I I
L .Z•bL I .9".ZZ .Z'bL I 3"•ZZ .Z"b{
�. 1 I L .B'.{
b � .o�.A� b b b � b
• �' _
• �� � �$ "� � �
• g� Z ��z� EE� g N a � Z
S a .»..v't �s � o� � o a �r �a
.� WI �a� ��� oBSo° g ° � 4 � �� g� 1�
� Y s � �F � � wu��� ° � a5 `c� c� O `Y rn� �
� �� �8g = � �>.. .°•z°� c px <� tno a
E E ���9 �.5� � U �� UZ
�� $q� $ �5,� � � :�`, :=�": � 0
� d� a ��� 8°��� ���a�'a'� � U �� �Q
• �� r �p�5i� ��€� � � � a m � zZ z� �.
3 w t
�Z ; R_�� ���� � � � F � � u�ia. �
S
Z
O
H
U
_
�
H
N
Z
�
U
�
O
�
H
O
Z
s� � o�
g �3 S 3i
� �g �o y �a
� �� O ¢ �
p y2 �1- 2
a Uo O= � p ���
� oZ � � � O�� " �
1
>
Q�j >2 � O � mal� � O
W ZK n0 � LL �i x u�� .� 00 � •
r ��
y ^ ws3 � �
�C �n �. /\'_�
� ; Ys
� __-- �- --�- � .
1 , 1
��1�g'�_ � ��_ 1`����� �_� �� _—_
�'O 1 a� � 1 � � �
1 i�,,, I °� � � I iO
o�� � �
1 � � �
1 1 S`, ` � �q'�
1 \,/`
b 7,?_ _ _____ - � i �
� �SN�[i ' � t'� � --- --' --r; '_
1°'r,Yg� �{�Y �� � � ---� J�-J,6J .
,�+, �� g���-..�.-� _
r-��,� -�-�, ' „,..r �
� i � , p�r7�" �_t
`�i:�% � ,�r% 0 ',
n � � ' ��
' � ' CJ' CJ� ] �r �
� �
x �
`; ', `{ i ' jS � �m �
.}"� r�-i r�-i � f� ---------�'T-- � �
, ��0 0 0�` -t,
� , ;� � � -:::�...�..�r -
�, ; , ; �
.; � ., � �, � �
, N . .
„_, �{_, �{_, �� �- �
� , -
� �;-, r-, "��,--_�,��,�
��� ;,-; ;� a t„f�
�`' -,�,1 `,}-i
� `{_; :{_'``{� `s a � � �}; �}; ��; �
m � �� &- t ' t4 1 ' �
� � �� F-f; �-{: '-f; �
� � �'-_�V�_-� . - --�=� �-r'' '�-}'' „� �, �
�----�-----, °�---1---� � -'_-- ^� �
l�
�rt _ _�; ;' �-;-'t=-`i ; i ; {};_r};
- gl�r-,---'�-----J; `�-y-.--' '� �-{, F-'�, F-F,`
LJ
�c� -- --`=� r-11[=4"-�-�ti
.Cti,^
. i �i � .. i �
, e � � � �
"_'__1"'__ � L_a_�""" i �i � �� i n
� � i_i �_'r L_}'
� 1 0
� i .e ° _iG-L
- ��m ��LLo�� �m :
_ 'e°SryJ, g s =` r
� p ((�~ �" �
° ' ``��
�� ' �� y C:7C��~ � �__ _�,tT _ .
1 I ,._"__�'___
F � I � o � � , _11:,a'
�`-._�,i_._�_.r�+ �
-- �r-- --r=� g � -t----J
�.�,�.�. � ;'�!;
r_�_�_,,._..
ti � , R
`____�i_____' f_____i_____.+ V t„�.��`/�y._`\y
� ���i��r
�
� p 1'_�_T_'_�.ti I r�._�_�+_`_y O� �_____�_____ _____1�
�y.m _____i____' ____+_____� �; �f �
ttt��� `1 �
��L _i�i i y� r r-i=yi_P 1 ��
b ��
r r �
`_____�_____�1 �_____.a._____� � C
m � � �
� � � g
2
' ' a
J
a
S'.ZE S-�8 S'SZ .l'b �
w �
o . .0'tL �
ii� O
w��� � ¢
oa ry
>
�'��`�� W
�pLL� �
�w�� �
��yH �
- �
�
ya
J
U
2
H
�
- O
Z
�
>.
J Q
t�@
tf)
��
• '� �� �
� �� ��� "g� ;q - - a m
. �� ...� ��.� ��.� LL� o o a �� �, �
� �� � g � � � J �� o ,
� " - ��F ��� � ����g tt � � � � g
, €� Q �
�� ¢ � ��.�� m � _ � Q
E a ��� .�� M y � U �� W
� $� �� E.��.' Q � �C�P.- Y g,•E W
� �" E ��Q �� � � �����° � � � � E Z E
� �a � ,�n ��� ' m � o � a
gr ; �;�� a��� g � � � � � € � m � �
x ��w e
x � �i. _ c,�.� � �
, i;
;„' U
�,
�'�. �
� --- --� N
�� ` O
��: v
: ,. .
; "; __ ..__. �
�w O
3� ti i i� LL'
� g a� �' �,�' .,�.�_, � F �_ �
�� �, � �
� �� � � -,, I �al = g'I Z'
�� �
i< s� 4 _� � �o
a� 0 8� c '_ �� _. � °w3� p �.�� �
�� a �� � ` I ��I � �3I �
s s 3 3 s.� �`n
t� �c '" s1
, ,
? m'�p�,:`'�' '�y�. �1a # _I 1 I � 1�.
ti-:;
'.v# t x.ti:"�' E1 }x � � I� �- � i i I
_ i� ��i � #:k {�, �..������ty � , ^ � I 1 �; 'I . ( � �� t r
.. � '�. < il�� �� ' . � .
Y �. I� I! ��.
�� t � �7�� � s:��d r��� ip � �.�p � � r i � � II . �j� � ,� � � � i���
_ f:..,_ { _..._I I ;� a r'C �t t ?t� � I ; I 1 ��.
p ! �
�-'t I-- i--- i_'-.--'i � 9'�u,.� i:��`� � i�': �� ��� �� r � � `�} s �'} ��� �:
, � `� I i
' 1 I � ?4����� i�I � h �zf
i
' i. .;_._.._ � � �� �
: i ._ � ,`_�. I _ � �.a I � � i�I k if3�..�i� �'�Y g ��a
�� . � �_ �t �__._ � ��� ...� w,.,- � ��j ':.�� �, ���.. � . �� _ � {�- �� �� ��"�
i �
_.�i� - �� 4 � ��, r a:1; 7 � i � c*a�,.i� .
�,�� .,�. ..._ � I. k Y". , ._ � �E.. �` �#t _� a * ' � �."��
� �'� ��� U '', i ,i i� .�
� �a�� �� � t
� �� � � � � ���� � �A} . �� r a" o I ; I �iI I�� �I ` {� s ��t r ����r.F '. ��F`,�
I � _�___ �# �&�t� �f �` ��'y � i ': I I I , � �. +y ,}, ,
� _'II �. I
_. __
� - � _ + i� � '�� yi� q +{��t * � �i �l I �� k: r: `s� f i:.
�� � i � 9S 3�} i�Y e � .il ��� � �s � . . �
� v �� '
r
r� ��.���rl �a r.� #�,� � � � ; � �rr} �r.'� ��� � -
�.J I� � z i i _"— ��3 w t a ��2 j� �z.+��� i I I � j� l i I� � £�'���i ,;'� S i �� '_
-r-- �°°-,-°' ,?�S
i;� ' ---T � r� ��� ,:�s� " �,..� I I I :f � 'I �i -' '�� 3`� � � a'�'c] i',—r.
'�� ` .�.�.�.._�,. `.-'i s ��+, x j, �I , 1 �� � ri�� i� a ,
=_ �° ���� � . i; ___ � t �� ,, � , � I �, �.�� �� f � —
�; T- _� -_ ��� �` � * �� _ � . , � � y.
� , :;�� � �r� �3 , .,-
,i, __ ;,_m. �, .— �_, ,, ��� �� _ � , I � I; � �
��= x
�.t ; Ls�, '� .��;_ �,� � ' ' I , ;; �� J�
. _
� , I �__.i`—. ' � . ., < .. � %�� I� i ��'���' �� �.���o-�... —
, , �.
, � � F _ k .. �� i � i ,
I � '-7` �� ��� � �i� . - � �I I � ; I ika �uS-�*�,;§��-7 � .
i
��(� � - z ' � ��y��'ti I� i �I� I � M��r � e �---
�_ � � �-_ �� � 'a �'���1 `'��`� i � � �� �i 1� ��'� c r���
, , -- fi ..
' .. � � ; l�h �#�� �� y, 4 I I I� x��� ! .
� 1 �, �___.. i },4 {k� +� �+�� �' _ t.l-« � I t� �tr 'h� � �'_—.._
'' .�:. ,� -..,_' ' , ��� ��1{� ta i �
I I I � �?
�I`� � �+,.�,.... � —_� �.��� �� i� i.3 y_M # � i� ��� '� �}�� .
I i ...�,�....�»,. }.1 g�i{� F��t� y.'�.::.q I � f X tE F
i I �i1`� � t �h 4 y�g1 .'�'4'�� I;.. � ; �4 f �k y .
,._A� 1 � C.� r+� ����� ��, ,�-b,.< ` I T. y!1 $"i �{� 3'� �!13# � � ,
j i ��-'-.« i --- ;.� s� ��::}� y� � � �I��:�i j i i�I I' �I �j � #r�'��� .. r �4 �'�$�' J��''
�� .......,_..��.�__ ;. .�a �-�x,r�r�} .� I' I j I I�; I �i. � �`rT � � ,y .�a - �—
�I � � � a.��i�� �� �� � b �� I� I s���� --
o ; . . � p�,
I I I,II I , � �
_ , �.�.. ,.�...�.�._ -_ , � — ----
�!� "� t£,- -� (}�e` �:'r•�{ . � I�� �� I ( � I � �" A s
� �t ' i § � �Y�* �
�,�k...a�, � ---- �}e��,,... i �E i� � �� �i�� i�l �i � s�-�K n :-a'Fr
�I� � ---�- - i�F �� ���i 1 � i' 'I � �' a�� `�x
r- i'._ -- - .���+ �ir� ����'�` t� °+�p: b I � �i j i� I I t ����'# �'��
y �.2` '# 1: : 1k' A . ..
� � �'= -��— `��t��,i���� �T�, 'y �� - � i,� � �i i � s ` � v r j�� _._I_ � . . —
i!�I �...,.�. i — �.� ,� ^�"s�� ��t :.�'��� i i i ��I ��� �y�.,* [ r. .C;,E+ Sa 9�.� yi ct '
� � f;q} F. ]] �#,��^C,�
� 'I d..�-�-�,�a.� ! '�. �,:. 8 f'� � �T5 {F _ i� � ��j �� �t :..P t y �r �r !.x�'+y .
m
II yy
F I I 4 . �
i � � :'e��f� x��kf� � � �� � �li i � i �f��, t -
�. I f � {F�� , �f i I at .�� Y .. � � .
�
- 1 -- � � £�h�� }.�„G��}'f+'� . I �I I�i� j � .�� ., ��.��,� f� ` r Y, �i �
° } � �
�1— �I -r-_�,�.�._� — '' �.+��}1 � I I� �}��.a°` M� : ,�.
Lj , . q p I I i I ' �� � � ��, c,
���(��--- ..,, r,{`� +t n # Ea �. . I; j I� I- aj$- > ., � d.p . �:'�
'I � q I .. .��&.�'� ?� 3�{�R�Y?r° - -F +: �� ,.
�. + . .,J5 �' '?_ :+ ?} � .
_ I , x
I I 3 _ i �. 3 a. { .
1 [ •.,�i� }a� b 1 � �,� r ��a 4 i 'l-
�',i I ," +' � ${ . q � (I t - .
( � .:��� �]ky� � :��'��{'� � I i I � � '' ; }}�,j, � � {�# - '-t f+,:
b 7'� i- � 3EF°i � F3� ���[�tl: I i (i .I � Rt'+"' i3. .
,� -,_- .�..� — �� g�"� r�h�': �'�. ���_ - '* � �1� i �� � f, �'}�¢�
, , _�w� � ��� , ,'( , �; ¢���$ , t k}t �
� i y 3 ,� �
i, ,� }
� �;� i 7�; � �
I 7 }"^ �_�..,. I I I( I I � ��
�. ' —�— 1 --'Y Po 1 ��}� }�) I s, �I �i � �� . � �`
: r:�. t-� '_-... } t
i; � i I x c r 'C -s-- � j i I i � i� � r � } i * .
� � �
� � ' � '���� ����# � �- � .I � � ��� � �
,I I� , � ._ �- � {�� t��#�'�. ���F:° I ��! � �)� �� I ��� $ � �.. �
i �. 3..�, __ ������ ;��f,� ��k� � _ 1 � �f '; F .` � y�� _
z .� _ *x � � � .�M ,� �. .
��,;� �� ; : �� ��, , � ��f� �'�i� : i� ,� � � �;�� {���� � �
� I �
a ,; , �� t ����, �.
-�_ � ��� � � �
� �.�I � -G�i . ��kt�' I I I : I � 1 '�+',��'��'' �9 �,�{-"..`.."
..'I ������i���;��_��-- �� �t �t} �... I ( ' I . ' ��� � �.ir f 1 i�'}�Li�$!�-.,.�- 'b
r l£ � _.. �� � ; u��^�i j - I i I ' � �
� i .. � �� -` �k k h t�'��
i i y �� � �p'� �'Fe L�Nx���h � !� � I i �� ��:�,r ��Sa �
c
i I� � y�� � � � .tv� �jfi��� ? f��; I I
E , . i :u� �-�.^�, 't �f� .:F�Ne�.
W� _._...,. �g
� � 1 t �� r � ��;�
�'�.�� �. � . �i . � ��'�i`� # '��'. � '�� "� I i �� � ���.�f g�„ x t'��' � 1
,_ �. .. �� 3�7� r�� ����. ,; � �� � �� � i �� � � k � �� �" .f�" �
.,� `_.>...._1 I �sTr k f� �I� I �.�I ... �� t ,� ���r �+�
r ..�...�� �` �. � 1 �I I� g X't t � s
a� � I i
I`� j � -a� � �* ' �II � .i y3�r �t � � � 3 ,� �t
� S � ___ °Pt � I �;'� I i� r��.:�y t� � � � � i�''+.
O— ' � �— — t fi� � �' � � I �� fx��c r� � ��� �t; h•
i �� . W t .�..� e#t � � �-�Aa t� j s n. C � n g4 .i?E y�f .;k z .
'��� , t=.�,1�� _�...�"t, r=- � E I ,: i�' � p - �fi +� +v ' ' � O
� � i� ; � �� ' d �'- � � [� �. '�� ¢ �I � ..��) �I �� �I�� II � i� =,n >
� j fr— � �,�.� t � �._...��' � � � � i�.� � :� � I hw��. �%`� �
'� » . �:..,.. ,i,: r .,... ,. V+, ,.�:: W
;1 I I . � 3�� , ` :. �'�Yfl�.+4 i� f �- w _
. . ._'. . _ .' �,:. ., t
�
ll-'
1—Q .'n � Z2'4
I� I I I — ,I t� I-- �; � � � p.
� � � � �� s � , �� o� � � � � ��
I I I i �: 1 ;�� I �I � e � � � � __ � �
� � � �
A-.6l .0-,Yl .�'�9L .9-.ZL ` A•1 .Y-5 � .0-Al A•.Yl A-9L 4'SL�
1 �H1V101A.OG I I � � �
o �I �NI I I I
0
WI 1 I I I I I
oIm w=lm wl wl wI w� wI �I w�l w� wl wl
�m �m W' wa ��
s` xm �u wm N�
°� �n� °� b �� �� °� °� ��� � � �
��
• � �� _
• �� m�� ��� �� h x = �
M1� »�.��th� �$� �� °W o � o � n. �� cn N
a � b�o g � � � � o
� .c ry� r�� ��a �ax a� ^ � o a� � �
� �� � �. 5 ���� � —>g�8 � � m = �� � ¢
� � ��� g .� N�_�� uvi > �
�� Y V� E��� � S��5� m V � �
°c g ffi Y w
• �n °_a ��� ��€� � �da� � � m � ZO � �
• g s ; ���b ���� z� •- a '�' � � '� g m � �
Z
O
F=
V
�
�
N
N
Z
O
c..�
�
0
�
�
0
z
�
��
�-- w -------------
�
___-_'_f'_"'_
Q _____ _ __ � ____ __-__ I -__TI._._ __.-�
/4( . � I
�Y � ��
� 9u, I 4�:�" ��
��h7 � �
_� lqji�I,�, ;I
_ ��� i�
`a 7� i� �
w3 � I
?� �'k���� ��t _—_�_� ��—_ —_ �,i __ _
�I��'6 ` � � `�1iu1� °� � �I
�..i.. .is xa �� �—�.
_ �,_.I� i I' -- <� �� �.
I � I -� I ��usl��`YauYk��;. �� gLL �_ �____-'_
, ,;�- �� =3 � � Q��.
i,,�i,�„ Ijj ,'� �i I
!�I�� �� i '� ��'� -- -- – �,
� �
�i� � , – ----f - –—
I I I� il I ..�i� �'�ii
I �k ; u�
I,I��I���
��I I i i:TTI i , �.- � ,� ---
- , -- -
� � � � �� � ' � � � �.
I ' �`.
� �e �. � � �, � � �
p ,�. ;; � _ �______� � _�
� � I I I iJ
�aa n�
� I i � ,
i I � yu^�
:���_ �I I �I! �` I
,i .
V - I �I •.:.��
I� I ��,
� � ��
� �;I I N �� �a
o �� � � I� n,7 � �y�,�nt}p1F v�' m — I�1_ ���1. ��^ ' ���� __
�Oi
.� �aw w �� � � , ;
Y% _�¢a � ���. ,��' '�v���YI { � '?I
� --------- --- il �� � iW�4�
_ � ' 4� '�� �� I�
P
'R,{'�� G[+��.� � � �� h �N^
�.. ed��4�� � �MNi. -_ ���.
I ✓�� ��.�'� _".. ��+ 1_
ti �I
� k� ��
.. � �.��n�;..:
p �f�u 'IV �„ I.�:�� � a ----- z
o ------°----- — O �''�' ��f �
U � �'�,?� " � d W
� � � +ir .
w �n
� Z
� i � z� ,n-r� .a•.ro� A-Al .9-Zl .�-1 r•s p
�
.0-AL A"AL A"Al J•.Zt Y .0-1 .6•S > I i I I I I I W
01 1 I I I I 1 I � I I I w
¢ Q
ol_ �OI,� jI, jl. jl. >I, wlo a� �I �I N '
� � �I WI WI G31 WI WI ��
�I°i Q�I. �I: �I`.° w�° -w'�e �' W f w� ��� �°v�� �� o� �� o�
� a� � � � � � �� N <
� < v
• � _
�
• $� ��� �g� �N � � a
�� �..,�,� ��� ��.� ��000 a � � � a ��
� g� m � �,�� ��� ���Xg � � � o a� Z �
8p 8 _
E �. � ���� � y ��� � _ �� ° a
�� �� E , "�� Ea��&� �, ^'o�� � ,°,�Q N
� $� ��� �'� € � ����ao g ` w � E z
§» o g ��@� � � � m m o i a
• °� ; ��€ ���� � _z �' E � 'g � m � �
Z
�
H
V
_
I �
H
N
� Z
�
�
�
LL
H
Z
I '` I I I I
i i i i i
I ^�---------I---------I----- ------ I
i i
I j i I I � j I
Q ___L__f __ __ _ _ �—I--'—
I ( �
I � _ '___' _ ______ ' _'__ ____ I
�
I g $ � I
I � U O I
Y
I � � � I
I 6 I
'__ —_ __ _ —_—I-___
I
Fg � i
S U I
��� �� ����� ��� � �� � ���I ���
�- - r -�--
m -- , g r�. , ,
, g . �:-- ,
, � ... ,
� ; � 1 ' �
�
---- ,
� I� '
�� �
�
— -' --r-' i
� i �
o — � �- -- ---- —F---
_ _—_ '
� L________1_____l.__ � '' 'J ` �
� � � ,�� �
� �
; �-�' �
� � � �
m¢ � � � -- ---- - � � �
� �
� , �i i ��, � ;
o ' _ —L--—
_—_ _ _ ,_ —
T'__� �i�' "'___'_ __ �'.." _ " '�)
I
1 I I �
___�_��� � �
I I �a I :
i i i �
I I I S O
�
� � � � W�
�LL
----�-----►----�---- -- --- ��
� � o
� � � � �
�§
---I---�-----I--- -- -- om
� � � , Z�
LLI I I I I � � a
0
=I .o•.a� I .o•.ot I .o-.et JI .r•z� .o-t JI 't sJI
w� w wl
i�m i�m wl°� wl^? �< w�a wl�
�� �a� � �� � � �
i�
{��[^} c �
i¢�/� � t � �� w� ��� .u'. .
`,��� i
7��.� � �pa edr r j��
����'� `� :e � � ��� }�{�
� .�� �r i
$ �� v# �`���{ � �#,!� ��4 'i6�liFi��� A'BZ
� � � � � ,� ::i . . .� I
' � ;.. � �a � . ' ' ' �
. � �` , ]� x �...p —__' _
I � I
- � M� �
� # , � i —� > ,
� � � ��t
;
�
f � � k
^
� � � f�f���� � �� � �1 ��.� �f � -
c�� � " � �r ���' �
���,��;� � � � '� ' ��� ----�
a � f �' ti � �
a � � � +��- � � ��� ,
� q 4C�r.''� � '� A � �� Y� � .� } .... __ _ _ .
S : � ��� `.:� � "*..
C 0.;S x � �`.���b ..� � .- .
� �� �� � � � r� � �� �'.
k � L
7 4
$ 3 t
4 Z�W r � � � �����, , .t ; ,
��. S�v.,,. � � r - -�� �� �f�
6 �
..
n ;�
z
�.� .b .., . i�� , a. e�w�a � � — —
4 { � �„ t�.' .�'�.� i�y, � i _ '�
}#R�{¢�9� �,h f.�� �j � { �� �t �*}.��j���.. �, i . —' li, I , r
4
��t t �
� { � � +�t +8 k� f k�• �
?t� � � � �� f 4� � � j .Aj[ ���i �� {�� ' ` �, .
{ `. � J `� r A rS ' h' . m�^
¢ � � A:
faY� �f ��r��� t�:� � . �v; ���� : �'. '3�e. . � _ j�-�� ot�,��i,"� '..f; +F$!� �µ�� y:�:;� �, � k.�{ {� � ; "� .
; .,. . . �.. . .�""
i� r;������ � � {S �,"n� �� t"�' i � �. — `���k '� {aW #Y� ��
F �
a, a ; �,�: , — � , o-
i f � ���.� r � f � #� i I �, I , �� ,� � � � �,
� ° ,� � F� s , � .- { �� Qz. �,
_ � i� _ , � `;�� j���. � - .��s ��# �E
�I t�r � ���� v� _ s �.tss i 1 k i� a � � s
�,_ ti u-��} � -_ _ __ x � �� �x ���
: .,�FE�� ��� � __-- ._._ •� .` ��� �.
� Y , r;,
, 8.Y 2 '�,{ ..
�s" � I
. ��� i- V` ��,' w§
t � }`^ ' i] %vC k � 4 � �r 7��
�.) �� t��.x1M . ���• 'i fM1 P�i r� �t
t
,��� C � � �t� � _� ��, . -�� - �} � - �
� h�l�r 4� ... E _.� �_..____' t� � S{ 7 I i � -,�_�.'�: j:` I �� �� ���� i�� "k�� .
�:.
� -�
.rr����� ! � S�p ti I I� h i t �
��? tit i �
�? ,�
� .
�F ��� � O O }� � . ' �r __�- :� � �x�.d f��+$ '��� �};, .
� Q� $ a � � . �;y n��' �� ;� s
v�u 3 x w {,#r �. ; � ,� '� ,� r:.�r t.
�y yt�f U� t� y� yt��� •��� �'� T'1 .,�„� f'�.
gk � � I ���� C"�r� I — �.�� �� �� � �i
b _ _ '_ w p .f � � - � � .��• � � .t��,�
F$ ' �a§ �� I ,�� �s ;y�y ?��� ,
�
F , {$ W J ',, .. .. _
: � � > ; , � I �i _ 't k��
`� z w �
I I I t�'.�Yx '� . t _,.�°� � �w� I� SF �� .� ' , �. —,-�'�-..... � ��...�� � r. �� -x°
� � � '� � � � � � �� i l,. . � , � � �
� � __— :.__ k� . ,' �
� � i � � :�� � � ?� ��
u .0'Al .0".4L .0'.4l �4 .4'Zl� .0'1 .6"5 ' { ��� � .i -���
�I I I 1 I I I { { __ � 7�
OI. W OI: jl_ jl_ jl. jlp jl. �� � S �:' ���I � Y'M1��'{�� � Y��� ; .
xl" oxim wi� �im wl' �I� �I°• . 7��y�h r� I ��� . . _ ���f � � Y
aJI�w �a m �f,I,m�o }I ( i� u��- i I I `� •� K� .
v � � v � � v f � �x..x �. .. s� t,
' �
. �.. Ta_ I �� � � � �x .
"�� '� � , . , � : �����'�'�f"� �y a* };
� Y ) � � I ..._.
� � M1 f ` .\ � . .. �. {4 A�t.� ��f� ,f}���.
, --- ' �?
� �{ { � s Y�'F ��' 'g :t�: .
� �+' ?" E i
� r � � �s
__�__ �t�:� k4 � �-��� '. _ �A� �{�� fi}
{ # � '_
�i � � � ' � �R'�. 1� �- •j�}�Y 1�,� �j'+?{
",y�, � ,, � .�.�1"'._._._ }�'.•�..-...n �.� � T $ � 'hM f"'_"�"
p, : ..' . � I _ .J.�.�_ —_ �4F�� I y�}A.�\ .
'` :� { � -�- �-�`C , f }��
„ �
� ,� �; ��, :T
} � � � � �� �� �� � � € �
� ��� x � � � i � ��
� � � � � � �
� � 5 �� '� � �� �.; —��'� =- �� 3��� ; ��.r� ��� a{�
� �. � 4� �� � �. I �\ ( i-- ` �" � ���� �� ���a
�� 1 � ' �`�_ _ _ r ����� _.�:
� : ` ! � , � �,� � �„ � ���« E� ��
. ��� 3� �
�x � - — � � �
t�.,� � �•;_ � �a��' � � ' _ - �, { � �� �� -` � �
� " ���i 'r� #
St� � i �� � . �" , � �� 4
�
�.." �.'.% �� �r'��-' ���� �_'?� _._. �.��� aa � ���5 : r
� R� �'5 i +,1 ���" 'i p " '�.� r ��+
..� i�.�;; _..§ � .. -a ,'.��. t�,; z
} ��
.d h�.# :s'.. [�'. �." __.
s � ;
'�r � ;� . R � �'4 1 � .... �� 'h`�r� �„i ���
� '1 }� y��� �_
' � `N r.z, dU' � r ._ . � $�3PV_ 7'�t'.C4
y, i � } �;,,� r F ��-� � � _ �}� ; f �
f 7` {
N f'.{� k £.`t ��",k��t3�^s�?: I i — �`,.. r ., �p �'t � �� �{ �C.<
O �'�� = � �u�Stw�`���� � '— ��`� '�f e �,f�
N � r � # r � � m4 Y` ._� � `� �5�k
OD {..�� � , , �.— �¢ �yrt�{��'a� _. v _ �� ��}y�� � .
L L I F a�}�kT�h�� - \. `.: Y I ('''y t_
L__ y
� x �.,. ����.��fi i E S _ '° i�`e� �t }a D�� R �
Q � �� � ���� ��#�. ��{{:- i r_`_ �.�_ i . =N��� �� �'�� ��"k
+ a.
Z �'' � v i � � k'��a �': x� s��i � � � � a a..
r
Q �, { ` { �'�{' ��# A" �� �kt� t��'������{�p$�.' ��{
—� '-' �:� r �� �°�" � �� — . Fn� 7 ��„t�y� t� #
°R � ,�fi r t , ff
� �� .._I �. ,��til' ���t � 4- ' �r,f� � 1A 3� T-���? �{;r{,�.
� �; � , j ���� r_ 1_ ' :�3��k `�����
z �: �- - + � : �' $ a � �� ��,_ £ r��; r� ��� � '
Q � � � a'�F T-` � �,h i� Y, P a . ,
!— � if� " � � P tv�j���i;` '� q ��"'�'f � � '��a '��d ,rt
Q �,. �3f �.� �� p � I � �r � �,pr G �'�, +s + "�
� ..,�.. t��i �-�°' _ {]V�{� .�i 4 a�dY�. _
w +� �� i I
� I I� . .h�; . 1 :,. _ j� � i{'; ."
w k'�, �.�U � & y ¢ h �. € �.\.:�- i \ '� ��1 �:.1 "�
�d }� "� ., w i F d �*"r` �. I �_. . '� '4'� �
` � . � �. J ��{y � [ O I. � I 1 ,n �uY
3 �' ��`}� � I p '� Y? , O �r- 'v�`� - :} }� .i( .�. I C' .
J � �� '� t�•� �7���. 2 Z t '� ' ` S } � s �t� �z
_ �,,� F�L a3 c�F�Y�"��7.� �w � � '� r��x'. w p ',� . ,��. I ... I; ��1 .y � � a ��� a O O
V ;� �r � * � a cn �' a a ��� _�;��t r�'t ` �>
� a � , ��:� ��u �' �� M . � � �
Cn ��.." ' �Z W
�
Y �O c�w �_ii!:.. `� »1:. '� �x a
W ,� �. �� �>§ i F� ��4 I i i �,' � Y �
,� .�� z � � �` � i � Kk ���
f��. +S I�.,,, �.'s, x �} �� w O:�
� - —w. ,� — �:i. a�. A t., �
X O` :�� ..�:,.
� z
J m � fn�
� X �". � 1& . � *#� ..
m I I I W w� �,; Sk �.� �� w cn� I I I I f r.��; i � �:.
�>
I 1 I �' x('u d`0.`F_$r 1`.� ' t'� � x
� � x '� �_' h�� G�r�3:. M �
.0'AL .0-Al A'.9{ .6'�4 .0'1� .>6,.
O .0-.eZ A-.ZZ `JI3H N101 A.O[
O ,� O
�I �I I I �I �I I I �� I I I I I I
� � �
�I� RI_ wl. wl_ . �I. RI_ wI� w= slm �ilm wlm wlao w�e wl= wlo
yI� yI1O I°• �I°. y�m yi� I� �I°. ZI' o i�� �I- I- Ih I-' -'I.'
� W� �� V � W� W� � � a� Na� V � � � �
�
Q
J
0
2
,_.-- --- ---
- �- -=_-�_
�
�
�
i
�
,
;
�
I�
1�
� _.�i
�
�
. � ,
� j
j
� ,�
i
i
�
I , . _
�
I
i
-- --�
� O
� _ _. _
, �
�
I
I
I
j ta
�
����b�ii ,M' � ��''ij(..
�� ''"�" � Planning
� ����� �� � ��''�� �, 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 fax
e � �
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
"60 Days" Deadline: April 10, 2012
Agenda Item
4. B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #480 - Final Design Plan Approval - PUD #66 - JLO Addition -
Amendment #4 - 7200 Wayzata Boulevard - Jeff Lupient - Infiniti, Applicant, Applicant
Prepared By
Joe Hogeboom, City Planner
Summary
At the January 23, 2012 Planning Commission meeting; the Commission held an informal
public hearing on the Final PUD Rlan for Amendment No. 4 to Lupient Infiniti PUD No. 66. The
amendment would allow Lupient Infiniti to expand its building by enlarging the dealership's
showroom and entry as well as adding a car wash to the north end of the building. The
Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval. The Preliminary PUD Plan
was approved by the City Council on December 6, 2011.
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plan subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These plans
were prepared for Lupient Automotive Group and include the following: existing and
demolition site plan, proposed site plan, existing floor plans, orientation plans floor plans -
building A, floor plans - building B, e�erior elevations and landscape site plan.
2. The applicant shall stripe a pedestrian walkway from its handicap parking stalls to the front
entrance of the building, as shown on the site plan.
3. All recommendations and requirements outlined in the memorandum from Deputy Fire
Marshal Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated
September 27, 2011 shall become a part of this approval.
4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code.
5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws
with authority over this development.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Applicant's Narrative (1 page)
Memo to the Planning Commission dated January 18, 2012 (2 pages)
Planning Commission Minutes dated November 14, 2011 (3 pages)
Planning Commission Minutes dated January 23, 2012 (2 pages)
Memo from Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson dated September 27, 2011 (1 page)
Existing PUD Permit No. 66 (4 pages)
Amended PUD Permit No. 66 (4 pages)
Ordinance No. 480, Approval of Amendment to Final Plan of Development, JLO Addition,
P.U.D. No. 66, Amendment No. 4, Jeff Lupient - Infiniti, Applicant (1 page)
Proposed Site Plans (10 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 480, Approval of Amendment to Final Plan of Development,
JLO Addition, P.U.D. No. 66, Amendment No. 4, Jeff Lupient - Infiniti, Applicant.
Pa»'d A'�� ;� � � � � � �� � .; ' 1 i i i
��� ��rq ANe,�e MarsM ����::. �� �,� L€ans P�rk�' `` i [ � � � �s��
' .�� � � � �_;�� ��x
� . , �
? -�- � .... _.C._ ._.Wes#ern Aue - -�- - _. „1 c+s ��.�-- _ _ .,�_ _ .,. �, ...Western Aue"�
, � �; r�
a� �. ,� � _. _ _.� _
t � �1 1 � o� a,. S � ( t
� y� � ''x ti� in i ��
� � � � -{'t' �,. ,� � GortEawnCErFl:,�
�-- ,, � '$,. r'� � t� J,3 � '
! `e �.:.,:0i f 1 ��-�. R L� ;t(, di. � . ( '`� ..
. ,� � �.�8;1�� � ��✓' � � �� � �G. Y .L ����
�� � I � � F �, t ��� �� � � �-:Cc�rt�wttG�S.=
,a � t f � j � � +�c
� y l t � �� � � �� z
r F. -�-- ^"�` 1 a+
��w.. Rd_ - � ��� � `
_�_�td8ev+aY 7 t �s� r { Gatonisl Rd°-- -+ �K�
�.IJ ! 1 � �u
`�' � r _ ...! �iNeStlt`ltlg�+ti�rid �� ������„�,�{,.�,i S CtutfBW�
1 ' I t � � .�wr�� � �;���,�?.`��,,, ; E'�tR!lJ�j N0�7ld;4 + � �
r ,� t ��,� t�ue��e!Av�i_�ireenbelt(��&W�tt���Pontls}t
i � � - ��� � ._.,..
g - - -3 --- --� m_ - _ - _ _ ._ ... _ �Lat±cetAv_e_ , ' _ _. �
f � � �
P � Subject Property
� y , �
r > ; ;� � �>
µm 4 ; a
o � r ,� � �
1� � ! — -- -�—r�s���t se- —. �� ,
� 1777___�ttt,,,SSS��� � /�/i��� , �� ' ��� � � i
�t i� � �����/j / /��'� r�` � 1�
`'ti � � � ��/ii/ii���/! 1
`" 1 �i ��i ,�,�i i 1 { 1 !
"`°�. � J � ���/'�/��i� � '� _ _ � _ .�_ -t _ _ /
�°-^. �.. � �� r r � — ':..:'"`i=` -..-t_.._ ._ .....,. ,_..�. ,.. � ��2,�� �
«. .` YU'ByTatB BtVd_ ..r _»_. .o ... �.. _ _ ... ... r _ .. .:`�... ` _. ._ _ �"tl
..' ~° �� °` -- ...... ......, � +.. _� °._ ...... .' -�� _ _ iaxterst�t�Hwy 394° _ _ $ _ e. _ ...,_ 4 �
-.�,.� lsrt�rstate HwY,:394_ '"'"�
=��c -..,.. _ _ � �"�rpr �. , .., _.,. �R ,_..._ ...__. - _„ t -.. ... _
ur � I '� � .-'� 1� i
� �,.. -i 3TFi LA '^ � �� I �„�1j � � vj
vt ..13Tki LA '-� � "- -- - ... .�._ .... �,M_. «-° �` t i �
�`�� � ,� ! t, i �l �
= I � i i �
� � �- t�1/2 STVY- �� � 1 i � x
4 a � ris u�
_ ..a ..f �� � ...,.�_ � .� , ��� ,.�... �� ��-!4?k�S71+�#_ _ -. .� Q
�
,,�z � I i � I 1 p �
�. .'�.'f4TN S"F W_ _-` x� � r I I I ? q
( °' � i I 1 ? f � � �
O cn ,
t � � v� � � � 4
� ! u�i a y �' w i � �
�
a # � � a � � � �
�� L_. .... _ � .� _ _ �_ __ �_. - ._ .� � � � !
t ! � `L y, � x � � 1
� � � � � ' ;
J � 1 z a� t� _ _. ._�, _ �. _�_ _ ....�d... _ ... ..�..6w
�� ! � 1 t 1 1 f !
� 1 � 1 1 1 I i 3 ���'
r i � ! ! I t C I
l�
a�mt.�,a,.;s,a.�,+s ct,ar*�Kt���.ocisu^asa� i f i I t o :?92sa 1
INFINITI OF GOLDEN VALLEY
PUD AMENDMENT
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011
NARRATIVE
The present Infiniti Facility is in an existing "PUD Land Use" and this is a request for an
amendment to that PUD.
The Owners of the Infiniti Dealership have been informed by the Parent Infiniti Company that
they must bring their Dealership into compliance with the new"Image" of In�niti, which is
comprised of a new"Glass Wall" at the front of the building and a new entry vestibule. The
Owners would also like to add a car wash to the rear (north)of the building for restricted use
for customer vehicles.
The new "Glass Wall" is part of a minor extension of the Showroom (640 Sq.Ft.) and the new
vestibule adds only 315 Sq.Ft. These two items alone would allow us to submit for a "minor
amendment to the PUD", however the car wash at 1,150 Sq.Ft. puts this into a full PUD
amendment.
The additions have little or no effect to the existing parking lot except the car wash will reduce
the amount of inventory parking on the site. This car wash is not a public wash and is only used
by the Infiniti employees. There will be no changes in the grading or storm water control on the
site and a minor change to the landscaping at the front of the building.
The exterior materials on the additions shall match the existing and the only noticeable change
will be the "Glass WaIP' image which faces I-394.
The additions total 2,128 Sq.Ft. resulting in a totat building footprint o#21,528, an increase of
10%.
������)� �: ��- k 2"�. , lr ; . � �� �f, t . .
� ��
��y ������ Planning
�� � - 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
�
Date: January 18, 2012
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner
Subject: Informal Public Hearing — Final PUD Plan — Lupient Infiniti PUD
No. 66 —Amendment#4 (7200 Wayzata Blvd.) —Jeff Lupient, Applicant
BACKGROUND
Lupient Infiniti has applied to amend its Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit for the
purpose of expanding the building onsite. The expansion will include enlarging the dealership's
showroom and entry as well as adding a car wash to the north end of the building. The
proposed expansion was requested by the Nissan Motor Company, which administers the
Infiniti brand.
PUD No. 66 was first established in April, 1995. It allowed for three auto sales and service
buildings. The PUD was first amended in 1996 to allow for the addition of the Infiniti
component as well as exterior repairs to the existing buildings. In 2003, a second amendment
to the PUD was approved to allow for an addition to the Infiniti building. A third amendment
was granted in 2007 to allow a barbershop to operate onsite. PUD amendments are required
whenever a change is made to a site plan within a PUD.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
The proposed addition to the building's showroom will include a glass wall which will extend
slightly beyond the existing footprint of the building. The addition will replace the existing glass
triangular feature on the south side of the property. This project will add 640 square feet of
space to the building. The showroom addition will not reduce customer parking.
Lupient Infiniti also requests to construct a car wash on the north side of the building. The car
wash is proposed to be 1,150 square feet in area. The car wash would only be used by
employees and would not be open to the general public. To accommodate the car wash, a
portion of the parking lot would be restriped. Currently, there are 216 off-street parking spaces
on the site. Restriping the lot will result in a net decrease of four spaces:
At the November 14, 2011 Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval
of Lupient Infiniti's Preliminary PUD Plan. As part of its recommendation, the Commission
added the requirement of striping a walkway in the parking lot befinreen the handicapped
parking stalls and the building's main entrance. The Planning Commission also asked Lupient
Infiniti to produce a landscaping plan. On December 6, 2011, the City Council voted
unanimously to approve Lupient Infiniti's Preliminary PUD Plan, which included the
recommendations from the Planning Commission.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plan for Amendment No. 4 to the Lupient Infiniti PUD
No. 66. The proposal will result in the improvements and modifications to the building that are
consistent with the City's desire to promote redevelopment in the I-394 corridor. Staff
recommends the following conditions of approval:
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These
plans were prepared for Lupient Automotive Group and include the following: existing
and demolition site plan, proposed site plan, existing floor plans, orientation plans
floor plans —building A, floor plans — building B, exterior elevations and landscape
site plan.
2. The applicant shall stripe a pedestrian walkway from its handicap parking stalls to the
front entrance of the building, as shown on the site plan.
3. All recommendations and requirements outlined in the memorandum from Deputy
Fire Marshal Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
dated September 27, 2011 shall become a part of this approval.
4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code.
5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations,
or laws with authority over this development.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes dated November 14, 2011 (3 pages)
City Council Minutes dated December 6, 2011 (2 pages)
Existing PUD Permit No. 66 (4 pages)
Proposed Site Plan (1 page)
Proposed Landscape Site Plan (1 page)
2
Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission
November 14, 2011
A regular eting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall,
Council Cha rs, 7800 Golden Valley R ad, Golden Valley, Minnesota, onday,
November 14, Chair Waldhauser ca ed the meeting to order .
Those present were Plan ommissio rs, Cera, ' uchka, McCarty,
Schmidgall, Segelbaum and ser. Iso pr as Director of Planning and
Development Mark Grimes, City Plan eboom and Administrative Assistant
Lisa Wittman. ___
1. Approval of Minutes
October 24� egular Planning ommission Meeting
Waldha ferred to the first paragraph n page 3 and asked that it be clarified to
ex at the process to re-designate th properties "on the General Land Use Plan
, in the Comprehensive Plan" could ta up to six months.
2. Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development Amendment— 7200
Wayzata Blvd, Lupient Infiniti — PU-66 Amendment#4
Applicant: Lupient Infiniti
Addresses: 7200 Wayzata Boulevard
Purpose: To allow for the expansion of the showroom and entry of the Infiniti
dealership plus a car wash addition to the north end of the building.
Hogeboom explained the applicant's proposal to amend their existing PUD in order to add
a car wash bay and expand the showroom and entryway. He noted that this proposal
could not be considered as a Minor PUD Amendment because the footprint of the building
will be expanding more than 3%.
Hogeboom stated that staff is recommending approval of this request. He referred to the
PUD section of the City Code and read the criteria used when considering approval of
PUD proposals. Segelbaum stated that the criteria Hogeboom referred to applies when
considering a new PUD proposal. Hogeboom agreed and said it is still helpful to use the
criteria as a guide.
Cera noted that the property is zoned Mixed Use and asked how this proposal fits within
that zoning district. Hogeboom stated that that PUD is considered to be a separate zoning
district and since this PUD already exists the Mixed Use requirements wouldn't apply.
However, if this were a new proposal (not an amendment) it would require a Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) because uses that require a CUP in the Commercial Zoning District
also require a CUP in the Mixed Use Zoning District.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
November 14, 2011
Page 2
Kluchka asked who is responsible for the maintenance of the road on the front side
(south) of the building. Grimes stated that the road along the south from Pennsylvania to
Louisiana is privately owned and maintained by Lupient. Kluchka asked if the Planning
Commission can add a conditional of approval stating that the road must be repaired.
Grimes stated that the City can require that the road be maintained however, he knows
that there are poor soil conditions in this area which makes maintenance difficult. Kluchka
said he would like staff to review the condition of the roadway before this proposal goes to
the City Council.
Ken Nordby, NAI Architects, representing Lupient showed the Commission photos of the
existing building and renderings of the building after the proposed additions are complete.
He explained that as a result of the proposed addition they will lose four of their inventory
parking spaces, but no customer parking spaces. He referred to the maintenance of the
roadway and noted that Lupient spent $11,000 this year on maintenance due to the soil
conditions.
Waldhauser referred to the parking area south of the proposed new glass wall feature and
said she is surprised there is no landscaping proposed for that area. She asked if the
parking spaces in that area are necessary and if it could be used instead for green space.
Nordby stated that is a convenient spot for customers to park and added that the parent
company mandating the design will not allow landscaping in front of the proposed glass
wall feature because they want a clear view from the outside into the showroom.
Kisch asked about the rationale of moving the handicap parking stalls from where they
are currently located to the south of the building. He noted that in the proposed new
design people will have to cross the driveway to get to the entryway. Nordby explained
that the proposed new location (on the east side of the building) for the handicap parking
stalls will be more accessible and are actually closer to front entry door. Kisch suggested
that a crosswalk be added from the handicap stalls to the front door.
Kluchka referred to the existing trees located between the showroom and the service area
and asked if they are being removed and if the applicant has submitted a landscaping
plan. Nordby said they have not done a landscaping plan, but that they would be willing to
do one. Waldhauser agreed that there is very little green space and what little there is will
be removed.
Kluchka asked if the site is in conformance with the lighting ordinance. Nordby said the
lighting on the site is not changing. Hogeboom noted that since the lighting is not
changing a lighting plan is not required.
Cera asked about the barbershop idea that had been proposed in the past for the main
Lupient dealership building to the east. Nordby said that Lupient never went forward with
the barbershop proposal.
Waldhauser opened the public hearing. See and hearing no one wishing to comment,
Waldhauser closed the public hearing.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
November 14, 2011
Page 3
Schmidgall said he is in favor of the proposed PUD amendment because it will be an
improvement to the area. However, he would like to see more green space on the site.
Kisch agreed and stated that he would like to add as a condition of approval that the area
between the handicap parking stalls and the front area be striped. Segelbaum also
agreed and said he thinks the proposal meets the criteria in the PUD ordinance.
MOVED by Cera, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to
recommend approval of PUD #66, Amendment#4 to allow for the expansion of the
showroom and entry of the Infiniti dealership plus a car wash addition to the north end of
the building subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These plans
were prepared for Lupient Automotive Group and include the following: existing and
demolition site plan, proposed site plan, existing floor plans, orientation plans floor plans —
building A, floor plans — building B and exterior elevations.
2. All recommendations and requirements outlined in the memorandum from Deputy Fire
Marshal Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated
September 27, 2011 shall become a part of this approval.
3. A landscape plan showing some restored green space shall be submitted before the
Preliminary Plan goes to the City Council for consideration.
4. The walkway befinreen the handicap parking stalls and the front entry shall be striped.
5. Staff will review the condition of the private roadway along the south property line to
determine if any maintenance is required.
6. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code.
7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws
with authority over this development.
3. Infor I Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 1100, 1170, 1200 and 1300
Doug s - . North — Rezoning fr ingle Family (R-1) Residential to
Medium Densi -3) Residential 012-17
Applicant: City of Go Valley
Address: 1100, 1170, 120 nd 300 Dougl ive North
Purpose: To consider rezoning erties from Single Family (R-1)
Residential to Mediu sity (R-3) Residential in order to bring the
se Plan Map.
Hogeboom referred to a map o e prope ies and lained the proposal to rezone them
to Medium Density (R-3) R ential in or r to bring t oning Map into Conformance
with the General Land Plan Map. Th land use design ' n on the General Land Use
Plan Map for these p erties is High De ity Residential.
Kluchka aske out the mailing list for th public hearing notifications. Hogeboom stated
that the pr rty owners received individu I letters and property owners within 500 feet of
the subj properties received notification r this public hearing.
Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall,
..C�ci hambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, M' nesota, on Monday,
January 2 , 9�,1, . Chair Waldhauser c Iled the meeting to er at 7 pm.
Those present were Plan ' Commis ioners, C ; Kisch, McCarty, Schmidgall,
Segelbaum and Waldhauser. re nt F ity Planner Joe Hogeboom, Planning
Intern Bryanna Vidden and Adminis �-�ssistant Lisa Wittman. Comr�i�si�n�r Kluchka
was absent.
1. Approval of Min
£:
Nove � '14, 2011 Regular PI nning Commission M�eting ����� �
�.
� i ){�
MOV by Schmidgall, seconded by gelbaum and rn'Q�ion carried u�animously to
approve the November 14, 2011 as su mitted. , e� ��� y,, � ���<_ � _�..
� �� ��, �R� >�.
tz� ���
���.
2. Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit bevelopr�i�nt Amendment— Final
Ptan —7200 Wayzata Blvd, Lupien�slr�,firn�i - PU-6����Amendment#4
Applicant: Lupient Infiniti
� � Addresses: 7200 Wayzat�:�oulevard � �
Purpose: To alloyu��fbra�he e�pansion of the showroom and entry of the Infiniti �
�.,.
deale��hip plu� a �ca�,wash addition to the north end of the building.
f��,;
, , , `
Hogeboom reminde�l,�the Cori��ission that they reviewed the Preliminary Plan for this
proposed PUD Amendr�rcn� at their November 14, 2011 meeting. He referred to the site
plan and noted �hat tH���a�p�i'�ar�t,�lias added the striped walkway in the parking lot as
requested by the��Plann��� Commission and that they've also submitted a landscape p�an
per the City£C�unci�`5 req�est.
4
SL
Segelbauti��asked if staff has looked at the maintenance of the private roadway as was
dis�ussed afi��he�`I�vember 14 Planning Commission meeting. Hogeboom said the road
��,. >
was�t����pecte���nd Ythat there were some potholes, but no major maintenance concerns.
�,�- �
�� sr; 'p �
Segelbaur�'��Sked if staff wrote a review of the landscape plan recently submitted.
Hogeboom said staff did review the ptan but did not write a staff report.
Ken Nordby, NAI Architects, showed the Commission pictures of the existing building and
pictures of how the building wilt look with the addition of the car wash, expanded entry
way and glass feature wall.
Waldhauser referred to the west side of the building and asked if there has been any
thought given to installing deep-rooted plants to help with water run-off issues.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
January 23, 2012
Page 2
Jeff Lupient, Applicant, stated that five or six evergreen trees were planted on the west
side a couple of years ago to help with the water issues.
Waldhauser opened the public hearing.
Stacy Hoschka, 6400 Golden Valley Road, asked if the rain spouts on the building are
directed toward the green space.
Lupient explained that most of the water goes to the west toward the gre�rt;�pace. He
stated that they also put in a curb along the west side of the property:a�nd�there;is a
culvert that runs into a rock basin and then into the street.
� �s�
Seein and hearin no one else wishin to comment, Waldhau;�er clos�d the� �ki�ic
g 5 9 �., p
hearing.
, �:�, ,.
Kisch stated he feels the applicant has incorporated evs�!thing that viY�s ��ked of them.
The Commissioners agreed. �� �e �z �
�_ �
x,
MOVED by Kisch, seconded by Schmidgall and �iiotion car`��ed unanimously to
� recommend approval of PUD #66, Amendme�t#� to allow�;qr the expansion of the
showroom and entry of the Infiniti dealer��i���I�� aa��r wa��i addition to the north end of
� ' �� t � ,.,,�;,
the building subject to the following con�litions
` '` f z�� ,.
1. The plans submitted with the �p�ic��i,on4's`hall become a part of this approval. These
plans were prepared by NAI'Ar:�hite��s an�-�n,clude the following: existing and
demolition site plan, pro�os�d�site;p�`an, exis�ing floor plans, orientation plans, floor
plan — building A, floor;plan �buildi�� B, exterior elevations and landscape plan.
2. All recommendations at�� reac�t��rem�nxs outlined in the memorandum from Deputy
Fire Marshal Ed Andersd�r���i�`�Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
dated September�2'7,�2011 'shall become a part of this approval.
3. All signs on��he prdpe ��rt�us��neet the requirements of the City's Sign Code.
� ��.
4. This approva��Br�� su������to al1�other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations,
or laws�v�r t aut�igrity�bver this development. �
� � 4 �', �.Y.
;:�, f ��.; .
4� 5 �#::7 _ � .
3. 1 far�mal��?ubl�c Hearing — Planned Unit Development Amendment—
� P Iirn�na�ryr Plan — 123 Ottowa Ave. N., Breck School — PU-88 Amendment#1
Applic °t: Brec School
,_,,
Address: 123 awa Aven orth
Purpose: To portion of the existing finro-story building (the upper school)
to olished and replaced with a new four-story building.
Vidden gave . rief histo of the ite and explained the applicant's proposal to demolish
and rebui eir upper sch ol buil g. The proposed new building will include a
reno d media center, c nsolidation of administrative services, additional small-group
C�.
° �� � �� -= Memorandum
Q ���
_ $
A�, e �� s�E�r� " Fire Department
�F i r e D e p a r t m e n t 763-593-8065/763-593-8098 (faxl
To: Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Zoning
From: Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal
Subject: PUD Amendment— PUD 66— Lupient Infiniti
Date: September 27, 2011
I have reviewed the application packet for the PUD amendment— PUD 66 for Lupient Infiniti located at 7200
Wayzata Blvd. Listed below are the fire department requirements.
1. The current fire department access road shall be maintained in accordance with the MN Fire Code.
The fire department access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire
apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all weather drivina capabilities.
2. The fire department access road shall be posted "No Parking Fire Lanes"with the required signs and
stationary steel posts, in accordance with the City of Golden Valley City Ordinance.
3. The current fire suppression system located in the building will be required to be extended, altered or
augmented as necessary to maintain and continue protection whenever the building is altered,
remodeled or added to. Alteration to the fire protection shall be done in accordance with applicable fire
codes and standards. Plans, permit application and necessary permit fee would be required, reviewed
and approved prior to the installation.
4. The current fire alarm system located in the building will be required to be extended, altered or
augmented as necessary to maintain and continue protection whenever the building is altered,
remodeled or added to. Alteration to the fire protection shall be done in accordance with applicable fire
codes and standards. Plans, permit application and necessary permit fee would be required, reviewed
and approved prior to the installation.
5. The proposed car wash building will be designed and constructed in accordance with the MN building
and fire codes. A fire suppression system would be required to be installed in accordance with MN
State Fire Codes and Fire Code Standards.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065 or eandersonCc�qoldenvallevmn.qov.
ea/jl
�.
Jim Lupient Oldsmobile PUD 66 Amendment No. 3
City Council Approval: February 20, 2007
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Use Permit
for
Planned Unit Development
Project Name: Jim Lupient Oldsmobile - JLO Addition, PUD 66 Amendment No. 3
Location: 7100 Wayzata Blvd. - Located north of Interstate 394 and west of
Louisiana Ave.
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Addition PUD No. 66
Applicant: Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Company
Address: 7100 Wayzata Boulevard, Golden Valley, MN 55426
Owner: Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Company
Address: 7100 Wayzata Boulevard, Golden Valley, MN 55426
Zoning District: Industrial
Permitted Uses: The PUD Permit allows three auto dealership buildings with auta
service and outside display of vehicles on one lot and an 8 ft. x 16
ft. barber shop
Components:
A. Land Use Component:
1. Land uses permitted within P.U.D. No. 66 shall be as indicated on the approved site
plan prepared by RLK and dated 9/10/03 and the site plans prepared by NAI
Architects dated 1/26/07 which is attached to the PUD permit by reference.
6. Construction
1. Proof of recording for the plat must be provided to the City before any construction
permits are issued.
2. An as-built survey shall be completed for the structure as soon as the foundation is
substantially in place. 1f there is an incomplete match befinreen lot lines and unit
walls, the developer shall either relocate the foundation or request City approval of
a PUD amendment to replat the affected lot. No certificate of occupancy wili be
issued for a building that fails to align with an underlying lot boundary.
3. Except as otherwise specified in the conditions of General Plan appraval, all phases
ofi site development shall be subject to the standards, approvals, fees, and other
requirements that would arise in connection with a similar project outside of a PUD.
4. The building shall be constructed as per the floor and elevation plans prepared by
RLK and dated 9/10/03, which are attached to the PUD permit by reference. The
building plans shall be reviewed by the Building Board of Review prior to issuance
of any buirding permits.
5. The developer shall comply with all instructions outlined in the recommendations of
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal, in the Inspections Department's General Plan of
Development review memo dated July 22, 2003.
6. All signs must meet the requirements of the City's sign ordinance prior to the
construction of the Infiniti building.
7. There shall be no outside signage or display for the barber shop.
8. There shall be no signs on any vehicle on display other than the sign required by
state law. No signs shall be painted on the window or surface of any vehicle. No
balloons or other inflatable shall be attached to vehicles or buildings.
9. All outside storage and garbage dumpsters shall be properly screened.
10. The landscaping plans prepared by RLK and dated 10/08/03 shall be made a part
of the approved PUD permit, subject to final review and approval by the City's
Building Board of Review. If the Building Board of Review requires additional
changes to the landscaping plan beyond those indicated here, such changes shall
also be made part of the approved permit in narrative form or via an amended plan
sheet signed and dated by the City's Chief Building Official. The developer shall
provide a landscaping performance bond in the amount and for the period of time
established by the Building Board of Review.
11. There shall be no exterior public address system for any uses on the site.
12. The lighting in the main parking lot areas shall conform to the requirements of the
City's Inspection Department, Lighting shall be deflected away from residential
areas and be turned down to security level lighting befinreen the hours of 10 pm and
6 am.
13. The approximately 8 ft. by 16 ft. barber shop shown on the attached Lupient Auto
Mall Plans prepared by NAI Architects and dated 1/26/07 shall become a part of this
approval. This barber shop may be relocated to another location within the south 96
ft. of the building as long as all necessary City and State permits are obtained and
the space is approximately the same size. (The south 96 ft. of the building is the
office/indoor vehicle display area and not the senrice portion of the building.) No
more than one barber or employee shall work in this shop.
C. Utilities and Gradinq
1. Before any grading or utility permits are issued, the developer shall provide the City
with acceptable plans, information, and other submittals as identified in all points of
the "Utilities" and "Grading and Erosion Control" sections of the Engineering
Department's General Plan of Development review merno dated September 29,
2003 and attached to the PUD permit by reference.
2. During and after construction, the developer shall comply with all instructions
outlined in the "Utilities" and "Grading and Erosion Control" sections of the
Engineering Department's General Plan of Development review memo dated
September 29, 2003
D. Circulation Component:
1. If the property north of the Benihana Restaurant is no longer available for emplayee
parking, the number of display or inventory parking shall be reduced to provide for
adequate employee parking on-site. All parking (display, customer, inventory and
employee) shall be in designated spaces as shown on the attached site plan
prepared by RLK and dated 9/10/03.
2. Cars shall be parked on paved surfaces only, not in landscaped setback areas.
E. Services and Facilities
1. The hours of operation shall be from 7 am to 1 Q pm, Monday through Thursday, 7
am to 6 pm on Friday and 8 am to 6 pm on Saturday.
2. The hours of operation of the barber shop shall be 9 am to 7 pm on the days that
the deafership is open.
3. Any changes to the drainage plan shall be approved by the Bassett Creek Water
Management Commission prior to issuance of any building permits.
4, All applicable local, state and federal requirements shall be met.
5. The Board of Barbers and Cosmetologists Examiners shall issue the necessary
license for the operation.
6. All necessary building permits required by the City of Golden Valley shall be applied
for and issued prior to operation of the barber shop.
It is hereby understood and agreed that this Use Permit is a part of the City Council
approval granted on October 7, 2003 and February 20, 2007. Any changes to the P.U.D.
Permit for JLO Addition, PUD 66 shall require an amendment.
, JIM LUPIENT OLDSMOBIL COMPANY
Witness: By: �
Title: ����. l'�?����Q,
Date: 3- I �' ' �vo�
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Witness: ( � B r
Y• -
�Linda L. Loomis, Mayor
Date: �` ��" a�
Witness: �� B : 7 •
Y
Thom s D. Burt, C ager
Date: � ��s' ��
Warning: This permit does not exempt you from alt other City Code provisions,
regulations and ordinances.
Jim Lupient Oldsmobile PUD 66 Amendment No. �-4
Amendment#3 City Council Approval: February 20, 2007
Amendment#4 City Council Approval: February 21, 2012
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Use Permit
for
Planned Unit Development
Project Name: Jim Lupient Oldsmobile - JLO Addition, PUD 66 Amendment No. �
4
Location: 7100 Wayzata Blvd. - Located north of Interstate 394 and west of
Louisiana Ave.
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Addition PUD No. 66
Applicant: Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Company
Address: 700 Wayzata Boulevard, Golden Valley, MN 55426
Owner: Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Company
Address: 7100 Wayzata Boulevard, Golden Valley, MN 55426
Zoning District: �r+a�-I-394 Mixed Use
Permitted Uses: The PUD Permit allows three auto dealership buildings with auto
service and outside display of vehicles on one lot and an 8 ft. x 16
ft. barber shop. Amendment#4 allows for the expansion of the
showroom and entry and the addition a car wash on the north end
of the buildinq.
Components:
A. Land Use Component:
1. Land uses permitted within P.U.D. No. 66 shall be as indicated on the approved site
plan prepared by RLK and dated 9/10/03, the site plans prepared by NAI Architects
da#ed 1/26/07 and the site plans prepared by NAI Architects dated 9/22/11 which
are attached to the PUD permit by reference.
B. Construction
1. Proof of recording for#he plat must be provided to the City before any construction
permits are issued.
2. An as-built survey shall be completed for the structure as soon as the foundation is
substantially in place. !f there is an incomplete match befinreen lot lines and unit
walls, the developer shall either relocate the foundation or request City approval of
a PUD amendment to replat the affected lot. No certificate of occupancy will be
issued for a building that fails to align with an underlying lot boundary.
3. Except as otherwise specified in the conditions of General Plan approval, all phases
of site development shall be subject to the standards, approvals, fees, and other
requirements that would arise in connection with a similar project outside of a PUD.
4. The building shall be constructed as per the floor and elevation plans prepared by
RLK and dated 9/10/03, which are attached to the PUD permit by reference. The
building plans shall be reviewed by the Building Board of Review prior to issuance
of any building permits.
5. The developer shall comply with all instructions outlined in the recommendations of
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal, in the Inspections Department's General Plan of
Development review memos dated July 22, 2003 and September 27, 2011.
6. All signs must meet the requirements of the City's sign ordinance prior to the
construction of the Infiniti building.
7. There shall be no outside signage or display for the barber shop.
8. There shall be no signs on any vehicle on display other than the sign required by .
state law. No signs shall be painted on the window or surFace of any vehicle. No
balloons or other inflatable shall be attached to vehicles or buildings.
9. All outside storage and garbage dumpsters shall be properly screened.
10. The landscaping plans prepared by RLK and dated 10/08/03 shall be made a part
of the approved PUD permit, subject to final review and approval by the City's
Building Board of Review. If the Building Board of Review requires additional
changes to the landscaping plan beyond those indicated here, such changes shall
also be made part of the approved permit in narrative form or via an amended plan
sheet signed and dated by the City's Chief Building Official. The developer shall
provide a landscaping performance bond in the amount and for the period of time
established by the Building Board of Review.
11. The landscapinq plans prepared by NAI and dated 11/01/11 shall be made a part of
the approved PUD permit for Amendment#4.
12. There shall be no exterior public address system for any uses on the site.
13. The lighting in the main parking lot areas shall conform to the requirements of the
City's Inspection Department, Lighting shall be deflected away from residential
areas and be turned down to security level lighting between the hours of 10 pm and
6 am.
14. The approximately 8 ft. by 16 ft. barber shop shown on the attached Lupient Auto
Mall Plans prepared by NAI Architects and dated 1/26/07 shall become a part of this
approval. This barber shop may be relocated to another location within the south 96
ft. of the building as long as all necessary City and State permits are obtained and
the space is approximately the same size. (The south 96 ft. of the building is the
office/indoor vehicle display area and not the service portion of the building.) No
more than one barber or employee shall work in this shop.
C. Utilities and Gradinq
1. Before any grading or utility permits are issued, the developer shall provide the City
with acceptable plans, information, and other submittals as identified in all points of
the "Utilities" and "Grading and Erosion Control" sections of the Engineering
Department's General Plan of Development review memo dated September 29,
2003 and attached to the PUD permit by reference.
2. During and after construction, the developer shall comply with all instructions
outlined in the "Utilities" and "Grading and Erosion Control" sections of the
Engineering Department's General Plan of Development review memo dated
September 29, 2003
D. Circulation Component:
1. If the property north of the Benihana Restaurant is no longer available for employee
parking, the number of display or inventory parking shall be reduced to provide for
adequate employee parking on-site. All parking (display, customer, inventory and
employee) shall be in designated spaces as shown on the attached site plan
prepared by RLK and dated 9/10/03.
2. Cars shall be parked on paved surfaces only, not in landscaped setback areas.
E. Services and Facilities
1. The hours of operation shall be from 7 am to 10 pm, Monday through Thursday, 7
am to 6 pm on Friday and 8 am to 6 pm on Saturday.
2. The hours of operation of the barber shop shall be 9 am to 7 pm on the days that
the dealership is open.
3. Any changes to the drainage plan shall be approved by the Bassett Creek Water
Management Commission prior to issuance of any building permits.
4. All applicable local, state and federal requirements shall be met.
5. The Board of Barbers and Cosmetologists Examiners shall issue the necessary
license for the operation.
6. All necessary building permits required by the City of Golden Valley shall be applied
for and issued prior to operation of the barber shop.
It is hereby understood and agreed that this Use Permit is a part of the City Council
approval granted on October 7, 2003, February 20, 2007 and February 21, 2012. Any
changes to the P.U.D. Permit for JLO Addition, PUD 66 shall require an amendment.
JIM LUPtENT OLDSMOBlLE COMPANY
Witness: By:
Title:
Date:
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Witness: By:
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
Date:
Witness: By:
Thomas D. Burt, City Manager
Date:
Warning: This permit does not exempt you from all other City Code provisions,
regulations and ordinances.
ORDINANCE NO. 480, 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
Approval of Amendment to Final Plan of Development
JLO Addition, P.U.D. No. 66, Amendment No. 4
7200 Wayzata Boulevard
Jeff Lupient - Infiniti, Applicant
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is
amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, and Section 11.47, by approving a Planned Unit
Development Amendment for a certain tract of land at 7200 Wayzata Boulevard thereby
allowing the existing Lupient Infiniti Auto dealership to expand its building by enlarging the
showroom and entry as well as adding a car wash to the north end of the building . The
property is located in the I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District.
This Planned Unit Development Amendment is subject to all of the terms of the
permit to be issued including, but not limited to the following specific conditions:
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. These
plans were prepared for Lupient Automotive Group and include the following: existing
and demolition site plan, proposed site plan, existing floor plans, orientation plans floor
plans - building A, floor plans - building B, exterior elevations and landscape site plan.
2. The applicant shall stripe a pedestrian walkway from its handicap parking stalls to the
front entrance of the building, as shown on the site plan.
3. All recommendations and requirements outlined in the memorandum from Deputy Fire
Marshal Ed Anderson to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated
September 27, 2011 shall become a part of this approval.
4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code.
5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or
laws with authority over this development.
Section 2. The tract of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as follows:
Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Addition P.U.D. Number 66
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions
Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 11.99 entitled
"Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though
repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 21 st day of February, 2012.
/s/Shepard M. Harris
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/Susan M. Virniq
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
���� ,��r � � (,�
4 �'Y �� ('� �f�;.
�- � ,� ;� �
�4�� *�m� „ . . . ��+ .r,
a�
. . � . 3�� . . i
' �,. x;-�� �' �.' ' p
�'��Mk
i � C Y'
� i
1
��� . �
a. � y
� �r j
� �
�. ' � ,..�.�
. ��
u �1;
o ���� ,
N
■��i� _
■���■
, ■�r�■
� ■���■
� ■���r
� ■��tM
_ � ,
. . �
_. �
. ,
. :� . _
i 1�4 1
., "�' .. .� �
� ±
� �
t;
�; 3.,.
,'����,���� . . . . . � _
� �' t�.p '�% 1l�
Ms,:�` � " # 4j�
� ��� ' _
�� � x' � .___ �
r��„ ' ` �
,.rT � �• �w+. .
#� A
��� �r+�w�«.�,�� f .g�
'�- �p rf � �, , a
s�r� d� � � .,� `'�r,.
�� � � , ,r : "�a
. _
.
.
� ��,
,�,� ,� .
,
., M�K ��,, ' M.�
? � �^.
.'".w'4��.FL'��� '
3 . .. ... . � ..
. .: ��t. : :..:�.
'..�. . � . / �.. '..� �.�._ � �..
_ . . . �#. � :�.
. � �„#�t' � .. ' � .
�➢* 2 ['a �,*�� � �� 3 . . . .. „��"� x ,� e ,. x
��Y4 t C .� s�� V+ �,
���� � a �,�� �
�a'�-� ;ti� . . . �. � . . P,� r,a �� _ �� ���
.t ` � ' ''�..
cz �a ,„f�� �1,�' �,. � � .
���. � . � � � . .
�
� � �
�+�„'�`a. t � � � � }..
�';���� �e �4..w1^i ..Y��'� I A N
n r ��
¢" ^i
5, t k*
+�s
-��� � �,�,��- .
:��, �: � � .: � �
- ��'� ,`� � ,�, � :�
�� �
f ? xy`� ''- �•• ,,. 4 ts
� ��' � � � ,� s'� :i��"��i°���"� �� ��` � �
�' �,�> = � � � � r r �v&g �`e���,� �� !��rt�� i �'�
�t�.,��'� r .a � � '�, �� +5:.,� +/ .
�
� ' ., �:.�i �,' � ,y�'�� �
� �,,��" , �f,
� ., , a • �
. ,. �r
° � rA��h � � �
�' W.� � . . ...t. . �,,...wn . ���� �..> R:a.. m. . �'�.q'� .
s... �:�
� . - �. .... .
.�• . . . . . . r
�
� y
i � � �� }
! �
.. \ � - ._ , .: . �a r.�� �
Vr *.
Z �
t ' Y}. � r�
s`
�, k i
.� 4 �'. �� ,a � ��..
P;, ��t
�f� �' � '�41f+'�Y���1`�:f�`� ^� � 5;•
��� I F.� �� .
.�-, A�
I
y��c
'f'i.
..�i�� _ .�',
� �
..'4.a �-Y .
fr` ^?-7t ��� , .
..X�• `�To ���a . .
y$�d-
5��S�lY-e� . .. . -�'
M.
d"
r� �1
�
�i. {
1. '
���4'
���
4
8
�
�,,: ....:...a:, ..,n� ....... _._. . ..
�� � .
f ��
.�' � A, � ���� �����; � �,k'�k����
r.�... ,' �, ������
�,� � . . � , ��-� ���'� `� .J� N1 .��
�. . ... � . . . . � � � ;� a �Y.�
.. . � � �'i''Z ,� � .;.-�
.. • . . . � � _ - � �`t � F� : :. .
�, s'a -.i.. . �:����aari
• ,�.�, ., �.,,. .
;,;.
i •� -
�v._.�,....._._ .,.o..:n.__....._.._.�._.._..._..e._......._._�_ >,..,�.,�;:4. " ►"" .
• � - ° �_
j
°" ''r. '
, '
. .
...,...,�.. . � � .." . '
... .. ._ _.. � ��.. , �- ..�-..�.�..-.-....—» .-+ . _
.,...,,.,,�..r.._..,.. .
< .. -•wyuo..oa„� i
.
1:..:rrw.... ���^�wr� i
�' � � �. � � . _�..
��- '
--�.i.. _
. � .
�. , °�-{ .._
. , __.. , �...�r..
.... •rt
� .. - ,...- ,.,,.,,
� . '� _ ., �� �.,��,�,,,�:�a�m„�z �� �
�--.�
,r �w'`0 ' � _�.�. �! "-`" a'�.
. � ' • � � .i.., � ,"'�-��"'�iii'.
Mr'� � '��
��.s�ii�11► ° t��, :�,tt...��;�i��#� j}i!` ��� ' "
�'' ��";� ..
..,.,,,,�1" � �rr �.
�r r 'III�� � � ,.; rtt +t
�.i ,
_ ��W��.� � << �����
, v .,,.
,� ,
. �..�..
.. , _ ._
.. ;
. : . ,,�
. . . _ - -� .��� .
<� � �.�p�. ��4 ,�"„�� : -�,
R'.� " - . ��� a',�, b
�
. ; .
,,
. ; � .
� '
.... �
wr� .. ' . . � , .. � � �4 d s. ,_�. S6'�4 r . .
� 3��'
a�� ?'!��� .. .,
,� �.�� .:, +�,,�.
. � p . � �
! �'"� �� i •_�� �, ar � . '� F . �V�. ' . .
�`-- `�• ,s'�J��.r" r Kx"•r"„ ; Y' '`^���"
:. . ;�1+". '�,� igi,;• . �J't �� =.:i�
. . - - � . 1 {' � �`�� �
�; �� w � . � E !� �, t � ft i � �"
� ,
: . -- . � .a�a- ���
. �
.
a: �"' - � .
����� _
� '
._
�
s ., .. .s�. . ., � "'!gw
i. . , �`w,w,. i L�:�. ' j' b d ... .,. .. � 5 t' 'Y�;,< � •��.,.
� .
.. �• r '�
�
' � � ;,y A4, ,y :
.
� ,. .
y. ... . � . �"- .��, .t . _ . .
p bA.::
;�. . ._. . . _ �' � � V� J' . ' .. � ���
� , . � . � , -i�'�'i.>�`�^M����i`� � �'�"`�''��'� .'�'6 .
JY
s?�' t l��$.X'`�1'�� .� a�1�1u d."'"'�/�8� '
, � x °#.��',. +�� �-��z' t��t'^i." . .
, � .� �.. . . . � , . _. . .
4; 'e � „ r �': ; �.�� ��7 f ��l - yN j� . . . •
. -�, "�'f,: ' w; yp, , `2'�t
� � �;�' $ �': `
. . . ,,
� s{
w�
, _ �
,.. .., , ., ., , �+r�� ,
_ .
n 9�`� •
-.. t ;. ��_', M ' �, ..,�, �
. �*.. �� �„'" „�^� nr� ... � � *� _�+ ,
's� r �, � .�..
� � _ ��s r�.'���'. � { `h'�y �� � w Y f:���
's �{.� 'h ` ~ �
. . , }��+ i � 5lh '.,y �M1A�"1�j` ,�v a.�.stYk� �
. +,, ... 'F ��� �, ,y,,.��„ �:*.{.q�i JRT'�,}�; � � "+P' �� ,,° J
��� " �A X� . '45 'IM��.k .�'� x �
h
r�..��'a� „ �"'' ;�'� A r� : . a�� � .
.� �.�, .
� , ,� s� � n� �'� ,
.. n . vt� ht,+ d
� : , ,
�" F � S"�f T ' ..i r� A �{y ry p". N � :.. � �..
. . . �. �. .� k} �f S� 4 • h o- rt' E. r t v�4y 'M1�y,,
��y rc ' � . � � :. � � .
.; , _ , , y .."9
,�
�".F,d+' '" � , Y"� �`t . � ^'� ' �lYs,C���Y bx }'�•�k�' �-�"����
, ' - �• -• -° ..
, , . . . : $ .. { .
A
�... � . � r "�� ,,,.�. ^ '..4 `j."' ""'1;.:�� i^"".�„�.� �+.�'t�' .
, .�__ .. _ .. . . . .,� .. . .. .�,�.. v . ti4':?a1` ..�.'.:rw.._..�°,.t.:�. .... , ,...... � .
� m �
s„ _ �€ � 3 � .� d V E N p��i�i � � � 2 �
sl��liH �ad � � �� � o � � o z
�� � � � � ' � � mZ � Q� " � , O
�� s� ���� ,e i � C � c� � m '�� o � i a
� �� �� �a�� � _ � d � � � �.� � =� W � �
� � ; � �� � � �� � � y �
� ���� � � � 3 � . aE � � p a . g � � � �
���� � � � a g Ca9 � J� �� l�L�dtt � � � � � �
I � fZ'6SZ
o;, M�•9Z�OS.bOS
%� m�o . . _ � _�.. �1 �--� �
n ��� ` M„LL 6f 80S �—��
I "W�-- e- . \ -
I t� # a $ �
I ��� •y��psf�.
�\ •pS�B�';
z�
� ``b °
I . w � . � R g� ��
� �� �n 4n
� � _ �° �"_"�`
I c� �N � ����$ �����° �
� � ��� b ����u-�
� fi� �
� �� �� �� ��� �� �� �� �� .�� �� �� .
I � _ �� ��� ��
I � .
� # �
# #
I � f a
-R:�s I � ' {r . .
�a_'_'� I . W
� O�
� � 1 °o
O d
Z
O
„^��� / '_
��� I #
_�- e' {}
���
�m
3 p�'eW'£
� __
\�\. . �
�. � \\ �� �
\� �,. � \.�\ �\���, �:�`�� �. -
s
\
� �
\
I \ � \ 1
'��
?b �
, m t�p #
� U d� d'
T�W O . ,��, N � � �\�
� � �v I
��, p
� v�� w �
.�o � �
�� NQ� � # \
C) \
\
w
� o0
#
�� a�
� '��
, � �'`-,����.�VA` V � �
\ ��� � \ \.�\�,.�
IN�d�d^S \�� m6A
s�: �' # �d�=�= O
__ o ��e ��w �m5& I �
0p N �.� .� � � � _� � �� s �� � W£„ �� �
M� ;; ) I
��,i �W �,
Z 3� . # � W
� � �
� �
# W 0
r^ mm 'n o
I �CJ
N
V \ \ '� �rn N
Z
� � � � Q �
� \ �� ��i��# � 1�
�a � � -��----
�� �, � �� w �'@ � �
---�---- � �
I N°� ° \ � ���3 `1
' ----��--- �m�°a \ � R�� �I I'
N r
' ___�o�_ `p`Tf00 \\ \ �. � L__JC N —�# �
� � �
_���I���� . �O�t�N � � T I I
G��N � �
----,�---- ��� N \. ��
----,---- � � r�-w� � , I
___—�—_,_ \\�9 � I
. ������ I
1 �� � "�— '#
"— ns°xu -------�J / I
16��OZ . �60'CLC -a-+���,,,wn�s� � j t— — — —
� 3„L4,6£.00N ' � 3„8£,6£.00N
�e��.�,nW,,�.ia�.--�
rn m
S1�311H ��1`d ���� � N �N � � �
s € s .� � L � p a „° � � N N
�„ ^ � ��g a o � V � ; � p Q v�i o o W
_m O
�§ =�� �E°� � � � _ '� � m g � „� N � c� � Z
s� n� -s"�'"� € o •� � � w '� m � �; t � a �
�` w � ��� � E `� � � � Y ;,m � � o � a �
�� a�= sg� � � � ' ♦ �,� w o �> � .. � �
. . . � �P3m� � � � y 3 C � � m C �o Y � z .. E Q ..
8��° @ = v� N L O 4 N �3p�Ry R '° m i °
���g� � S 8 p O O C 7 7 �O �'�Ei�B� � � d O N N
3a o a t� G � J Q �U' g;a3 f o
�
�
s
�d � � u, �
Q � �
� � q N 0 W
� �- �'� a�
X x �p �ZQ
W � N u W F ?�
N - N u
� � �m =� w
�
� Q Q° �,W �
_'JZUZdO O OC N�
�apaa��CaW� �,
W�Q��aZ��a
W
N J oo"'a�� .
� �
w������F�o�
z . . . . �l �L �L �L �L o
� � � � � �
N � � O N
� �O N N �-
r= �= N
� . N
� # �
I — � #
� 1
I 9 Z � 1
�cexm � � a Z � � �
�.�r. I O � � F=
����£�o ~ O 0 O
I � QC� OpZ
" ' D � QQ p
� " ��' � pp � = p� Q
� _ Wp � �
�o
o<
m
z C7 � O � � � Q Q
��n�n° / Z �
$x�° ( '� �— O a O CY Q �
=xaW � . � 0 � = W Q � Q
~ >c � � t� > UO \
� LLI
:�
��ma�
g��
:�_�
._ � _
€
s
I � ,
I \
N
'�h 1
?� 1
� � #
m „Y 2 m
�� ° �N � � \
d �
i
� ��� w
� o � �
s� ��z� �` # �
U \
' W
'N r
# O O
N�p
<N
\ 1�s
Z
I \ I
s
I � $mn �
�aa�x� "x�
�� c^ �
aw�� �o �: �:W=
-_- � �?x� �°"� ��ms � �
w __ W�` �
OON n __
O�p ` I
�N � �
M p� m�y
mN ,
� � � �
Z ��
�
� ° J
� m � J I
� � � 0 I
a # W m
U � �n
� m q N O I
I � � MN
u'z w uZ rn N
a � �� � W J O Z
�U� � a �� UZ I
�a' W a� I Q
w I �
� � id 4° � `�� cv J# I
z � z0[ `� 0.+ l�- I
``` W O �� \ I
`` Z LL Z V��Il
0 '" ; � O x
� - �°,� °'_ �
\ �fD�� \ � 'Y �
o Z r 7 \• � .. a W� / I
I ��\\'�, ^�.T� � \,` \\\� . � �_ U Q E _JI{�� �
�3_"wi \ I ��i'� � 3 I �
j4 b N�-p
� \ ��m�` � W a W Q
�I�U N�> � I
4�i a N � r o �
� I � I
°� '�` �#
1 w�o � I
-------�J
I
— — l6'fOZ — — — — 60'f L£ -a�^"°�•r^°�-�" � — y— — —
�� 3„L4,6£.00N '� � 3,.9C,6£.00N
-a-w^mwu.
� J
� � m �
sl��iiH �ae g �� � ._ � L �N ;�� � N o !•
�� �� ���� � � = � � 2 � �Z N � Z � f� O
� � � �� °�o F_ gZ �
� � �� �a�� � � m � �� '� �'� ¢ � � � a
�� �i� � V 3 � '� � `� ; � �
� � � � �
���� � � � t!� .
� a $ U' �IJ � �� ! 4�tP1 � � � � � �
I I I I
� � � �
� � � �
� � � �
i i i i - g
p— — — — — .�-� �
�' � � � ° - Z
� i � i
� �� � �q
�s � � � � � ��
� � . m
a � � �e
�� _ � � �
� — . — —. � - _ _ _ _p � ' �a _ � � �
�I I J
, � �t �
/ u — J
\\� � / � I W
/ ( � � �
o ' 4
L J I I I I N o
I � I I
I � �
I I
I
r � I I
� �
� �
� �
� I L �
� �
� �
r � � �
LJ I I i
I I I Q
- ---- - - ---- - -- - - -�--- - �- - - - I- --- - -- - - - - _�,���
'�,a'iou' � o �
� — — — — —' — � — —\ � I — — -� —
/ `� �i;. o,'a I
r , I I � I � �°-
� I
, " � � � �- -�� ���
� � � �L �� y-`- °,, C
�
��°�.'
( � �� I �
o- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ � � - -
�� �� � ! , .
. �= i .� i \ ;;
i i �
i � � ��
� ; i � i �
� �
L I � i r � r �
L J L J
o-. _ . —. —. t.—. �I _ —. _ . —._. —
I /
I __ � i g � I I ;% \
_ , \
a—. _. _. � _� _ . _.I_ � � — oo— — — --
, �o
I � � I ��` `�-- o I
� �
I ,� �,�' I I
I /4 I I I
A I
I � � � I =�� I I �
i I � I I �
I I � I � g4
I � ,�� `� � �N
I �. � j ,�' I I Z m
� � I �
I I ��� ��' t � �
i � I ��� I i � �
I I I I p
I �
I I I
I l I � o��
i I I
o._ _ _ � _ _ _ �_ _ � _ _�_ _ _ _ _ �. _ _ _ o
I � I I I �
�
z
�� a� m �—
S1� 311H �2�b g € � � •� d �. � � a`�N � N � 2 �
� , x r
�� �� � � � � V � m � �icT o � o
� sg ���� � �' ,� � .� � � g � �� N o Q 2 O
s
` � �� $aE� � � � °�° � � �= W a �
�� �'� ���; � � d �� ��o e� � � �
�� � � � V 3 a► � �` c � a � � �E' � 0 � �
� y�c $ � �� $ a���iri .� i �
_��� � G' � PU' � J� I�� � d � � w
4 4 4 4 4 •
_ — — — =Y�91 .F.bl J"�9 .m•�fl „0-�Q '�� .
I � � \ \\\�\ \� \�\��
� � � �' �� ' :���` 2
� � ���\�\� o g
i � i ,�� ., � \ � � Z
� .�-� o
° o _ a
� I � � I � I �9 � �
� W �
a
� � I �� � �I I � � �M
lo I � � � � � �
I _ I_ _ °' . � � � �
- - - - - � - � �� _ �
� , �
i � i i i i i �
i �� ' i i i ��
�
� LJI I i � I I
� I I "<
�
m I i L J
s I I I
a
I I
r �
� � �I I I � ��wLL�
vi �i vi�i vi�.
� I I I � $N�N
I � I I � � N
I I I
I I ���
00 , $ �� �
r �� � � �� ����E
LJI I I � "� ������
I I I I � a �x
�
�,�� - - - - - - � - - - - - - � -- --�- - - - - - - -- � - -- - -- - -- - -�,�.�N
0
� � .f-,�
W — - - ' — ��i —�- I _ _ —� _
o °
r �� / � � Y � � � �`'•.` �
� � �� I
e� � � Ir �
� � � � �� � � � � �
I I � ����. I �°-,� °Y'���a
� •r � I I — — - - - - -T -=�- -
I �I. � � � �
, °�
I I m � I
� i � I
I I �� � � � �
� ��I I r � r �t
L J L J
� _. �� — — — — — — — —
, I � I, 9_ �� g � i/ \`\
,
� / �,
m � —. I .TL� . I — —• � �_ — _ \ I — oo— —\' — — _
�\ _� � I
� I �� �� I i��
� ( `�\ � �
I � \
� �� `\ _\;''
! ��9. �� �9 � ,� ����.� z
� �I �-`�'I ��� g
�
�
� ��9 I I� g� � �� d
I I �� p4
� � �� � N
� � ��� � /�� ~ �
� W
� � � �\.,y// � �
�� ,'
i �� I \��,� I �
�'F o
I -I�y I I .�� �� o
� ��� � �� � �� �
�
I ��� I i � � �
I I I �
i � —q�� — — �� ^s
� � �, \ � ,.���\�\ ��
<
� .\�., ,�` � `\ '
I � ,�� I � `
Q _ _ , �� .
\. \ � a
� �.. � Z
�
.f�9 .B•,6 � .7•,6 d'A ..
a
� � �
sl��liH �ad $ �� � •- d � � ��� � �' � z N
�� � � � � � � � �� �� o �
� �s .���� ,� �' .� �� •— +�+ $ � � �� N o a � �
� �� �a�� � y= � � � � > ��; � ° �
' �� �� ���� ��E � C m � 3� '0 � E �' � � � p m
�� ¢ � � ' a O �� R � a � � � � �
���� � � � g C9 �I J� �C1 !•i��!! � � � � � �
I I
� �
O— — —
��
�� �� g '
;
�� °�
�
0
0
��o �
�
� �� �� �
O— — W
u — d Jg
� ` � x
I N o
`
� I
���jbW
'�uv+�lvw - - -- --- - -I- -- - -- - ---�j\ --- - r - - - --- - --- -o - ---- - - - -- -- - - - i-
j� �� � �
� — — _ — — —. —.� . —
—� _ _ _ — �._ _ � T _. o� I
_ , I i l� �� � j I
i i / °
� _ J I I � O I �
o a,.
� � � �� i; - ; � �� I
I I I �` - � _��� ��..
�� o
I i ' �
� / .�� I �
/� �. '�AL�A .9•�f �O, �
�(�►_. — . — . _ ' . � " _ ' —���-I — /� .— '_ ' _ _. _ . � \�'z.a. —. _
`! � � I I '�� � I ! a \\
0
� � I '9'�' :
� � �. — J— � �'�/
I l
I I � a� Y � �
�f•,9 �
I � I � I � I �
� ; � �
� ► - i � - , � - ,
� � � � �
�— - - - — � � - �— - — _� _ _ `_,_ _ _ _ _
� �- � � � � ��
ii _ � � �,
�
� .�� � a,t i �
i ---, � i � �p . � � \
,°, •�, ,L . - �
� � .r,a �
m _ ._ — .� —. � �'. —:a-,c— . -,¢ — . — . _ — . _. — . —. —. — — — —
� o 0 0
� $� � � a �° ,� �
�
I s� �� �� � I �� � .�,_ _ � �
,
j .w-.� m ��� _
I � :o �3R"�S .B- � .M",H � " �
m
I ��� �� ��� I " �
� �
I � � � '' �
� ,� � c
I X ai
}p�y �
� I ilal� i S/dl'�6 .I'AI ,� e � y w � 6r` .
p 1 a
'S9 A,�° � � ,. �y,�
� °. � � .
� �
� � ��� i �'�se ` e�.e,�.
� �� �� � .�'
;; �
� � � � �?
� � ' ��� � � � M
�
� � �
� ��� � �� � �` Z
5
ml I I �
� I ��� I I $
� � I I I
�
�- - - -�p - - ,- - �p- - - — � �
= § I ��� I I IQ .'° _ ^o
_\
I I _d_ f I `
� � I f � '\
9,�. 9'-0'
9-0' I 9-�" ��
.4'�91 .Y•�G •� .Y"�9 � .
� m v
� � m �
S1�311H �?�b' g a� � 3 ._ �i L �� ;�� � `� � Z m �
� v d � Q
�� ��� � � g � '� P ��' N � � c� O
� g$ �€�� � � � � ... .M,� $ � � �� o a z
� C . � � �
� �� �� ���� � C � d �m � �,� � o �
� ���� _ � � 3 � � E �� � ' ' � � o m � �
���� � � � $ � �I�a �� e ��a�i � � � � � �
4 4 4 Q Q �
o- - - - + - - - �.
� �
� �
� � - �--- , - - -- o :
, �
� � e � � � ; ; �
� � �
� ; ; - _ .m.,� � �.9 .m.,�
Q_.�, .�-.� � _e_
� ! ! , Y ��
�a I I m ,� ,\ �, ,\� ��
� _ _ _
o .
�,� °
I � i �� I �� �A
�,.�r I
�� I �a � i
I �� I ��I I
� � � I
�'� �
� I I > �
L � o
� _ _ _ _ _ _ ��\ _._ _ _ o —
I ,/( �
I �� I /� I �
I \ I / I I
� ;� �
� - , I I i
� �
� _ , � � ���
I � a��
I I �I I I
/J� � _ � O
I dQg ' I m •II
I �$ I I Z �
_ �� I I �
� _ ; I � I I �
I I I °°
�
� � � � - , �
I I I ` - 1 O
J
� � � LI'
� � N �
�
� � � o o �j. �
I — ,I I I I I m
` _ ' � I I � ^ a
I I I j
- - - - --- - -I- - -- - --- - i - I � 'Z`
'�rn�aivu — -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -aru�rnldw
��
a� � � � � �
si��liH �ae g ���� 3 •- d � �� �'�� o �' � � z �'`
�� ��� ��.� � � = v � �' P �� N � o o O
�€� _ — —
� g C '� � � � m �� o W Q N
._
� �� �� ���� ° � c d v �� �� �W � � � .. � W
� �
�� � � � g � � � �� ������� � � � � � � �
���� � .- � a r. U' �I J� �.C9
� �
O._ . _. — 5
� �. _ — ��� �� � �� �
' � � �� � � ���
� � �_ _ ��� �� ��� �� ��
�� � �g�i � � g �� �R� �R� �R�
� 3�3 � ���� �
o— ��---- � ►'` ������� ���� ���� ����
�� � � � � �
;`-.� � 8 � � ��
w
� � � � � �
� � �� ;;� � ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� �� �
� � �—. — �� :.. �� ��� � � � � � � �
� � �� � ��� �� �� �� � ��
� � �� ; � �� � � �� ��
���� � ���� � ���� � � ��
������� ������� ��a��� ���
� � �
g s
� �
8 8 8 8
� � ��� � �'� � � �
m ��� � ��� a � � �
o- _ '��e '� � � � �
� ����� ���k � � � �
� — � ��� � �
� �� � ���� � �� ���
� � � � � ��� ���� �
� � ��� ��� ��� �
� � � � � �
�� R � � 8 � 8 8
�� ;
�� � �
;
.�
�8 0 �� �� ���
° �� ���
� �
a � �- � ��� �� �� ��� �
, . � �
� � W � ��� �� �e� �
� � ��� � � �' �����
� � p— — ��� �� �� ��� �����
W � �� ���� ����� ����
m � ~� o-- � 6 8 8
�� ��
w
QW OW
, � ..:.�:� _ �. .-
�
O— - �� O-
�:: �
� ,: �
�w
�� o-- — o-.
w ,�.::
o— — o— — — ��
. � �.
���
o— � �a
� o—
w �
��� � �
�--��� � � � - �8 � _
d ! a
�" f- Q �? � 4
� Z � ^
� _ � �� , �� p �
O T �� n N rNi1 \
�i
� {L m � �f m ^�i m
Z Z
p Z � a O
� T > �j a �W �
� � � J � 41 � �� W
� W �W W
$ � �= W � N _ � �
z
� � �� � � � €� � � o
W
o- - _ � � � _ — „ � 3 z�
�-,� , , �
^� "'� �� W "�� �`
a— ��
a S4 Y �
�� �� �°�� � � _ ��— ������ ���—
2 a>a> a>a>a> > >
Q� Q a�gW a� Q Q a'� 4�4'�
rn m
,�'° � L N v�j N O � O
S1� � 11H �2� `d $� ���� � . � G� L � � _ �� � � z , N
� ._
N� °� 3E�� �2 � 3i � •� }r m � (' 1O� o N O Q z 0 O
� �� ` _ � � � � �
� ;„� _"$�� � g � � � � � > �� a � � a o �
A♦ :� � E � o
�i �LL� =$F£ � � � W , 1 m> c ° `c j Fx s a �, .: � Z �
e3� a �A v :
' n;,°a9 � i o V� � N L• � 0 a � Ed`eR a _ � m '� � �
t8�� „ � - 0 D ; a 7 �a �7ae;g= _ � � °' � �
_,�a N o d f� U' OIJ Q f�U' �.xa,$E$ _ u fi o w
O
�
� � � � � � � � � � � �
g � rc� � � r � r �
w
w
�
� �*J �3* � t�oe =aa
7 Z
� � � w� o ZO
X — �
p �� I 11
L1J �
Q D�LLB=(S)�3�1 w w
� � � 0"LLB=(M)�3�1 � Q Q
� � � `2 � £'6LB='3'a F
W � � � � � � W � iwe� ea 8=a�� � � � � cn — —I p (n fn
U c ao a� � � �a � � � u�xi � � cv W � � I �
� � � � � � � � � or = � �J� `��� � �
Z � j LL � � Q � O � � Y I �
J F N � � � V � r J � � � �j I � ^ �
=31� �
3.a �L N W
� YIBJ Q I
— �11 dJ V Y V — — — $ .t ^ lL
Y� � �
� �
�
::�y
� Q W U q W u, l7 2 � Y -i F -
NI / +;--?Y o
�
c� �. ��/�� ^m� , o
���// , �W
�,�� --
, . ,
m �
, �
am
,
I �
� X
�ll W
N
_9s(N)'3'I �
'_8-(S)'3'I p Z
39=3'a ��
~m W
Z�J
LL Q¢
J
�¢z J
w�o ��
�op tQ
�nC� x
W
rzes a a
NIV 0„8
�
_
�
Q
�
�
Q
U I
I
�°� ��� �^
; Planning
O Y� �, e 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax)
� 1
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
February 21, 2012
Agenda Item
6. A. Approval of Response Letter to Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
Regarding Bottineau Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Booklet
Prepared By
Joe Hogeboom, City Planner
Summary
A letter to the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority has been drafted that responds
to issues associated with the Bottineau Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) Public Scoping Process. The letter reflects matters discussed at the January 30, 2012
joint meeting of the City Council, Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and
Open Space and Recreation Commission as well as issues discussed at the February 15,
2012 Council/Manager meeting.
Attachments
Bottineau Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Response Letter
(5 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve and sign the Bottineau Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Scoping Response Letter.
February 21, 2012
Hennepin Regional Railroad Authority
A-2400 Government Center
300 S. 6th St.
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Honorable Chair McLaughlin;
Thank you for allowing the City of Golden Valley the opportunity to review and provide
comments to the Bottineau Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
Scoping Document. The City appreciates the opportunity to be a partner in the study
process. The City supports alternate transportation modes and appreciates the County's
commitment to analyzing transit corridors in the northwest metro area. While the
Bottineau Transifinray would be an important tool in providing mass transportation to the
region, the City has significant concerns surrounding the D-1 Alignment, which is shown
to cross through northeast Golden Valley along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe
(BNSF) railroad corridor.
The City has received feedback from several of its commissions, as well as residents of
the community. In general, most of the comments pertain to concerns over the potential
impacts that the D-1 Alignment would have to natural areas in the city, as well as
potential impacts to surrounding properties. Further, it appears that the proposed D-2
Alignment, which would travel through North Minneapolis, would serve a larger
population and provide a greater opportunity for economic development.
If the County chooses to continue study of the D-1 Alignment, the City of Golden Valley
requests that the following comments and concerns be addressed:
Natural Resources
The D-1 Alignment is proposed to be located within and adjacent to Theodore
Wirth Regional Park as well as the Mary Hills Nature Area and Glenview Terrace
Park. These areas are invaluable and unique natural and recreational amenities
to the City as well as the northwestern Twin Cities region. The Comprehensive
Plan for the City establishes clear goals that provide protection of these natural
areas. The City requests that it be involved in all decisions that impact the parks.
The City is interested in the comparison between the carbon footprint associated
with building a transit facility in a natural area versus the carbon footprint that
would be associated increased transit usage as a result of the Bottineau
Transitway.
Any impacts to the floodway or floodplain must be mitigated in accordance with
the laws and policies of the regulating agencies. The City recognizes that
mitigation within the existing railroad corridor will be challenging, and it
encourages the County to work closely with the Bassett Creek Watershed
Management Commission (BCWMC) and its member cities to identify potential
flood storage areas outside of the railroad rights-of-way.
Wetland impacts will need to be mitigated in accordance with the laws and
policies of the regulating agencies. The City of Golden Valley is the local
government unit responsible for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act.
The County is encouraged to work with its local partners to identify potential
mitigation solutions outside the railroad right-of-way, if needed.
The Transifinray project will need permits or approvals from all agencies
regulating stormwater, including but not limited to the City, BCWMC, and
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. At a minimum, best management practices
addressing erosion and sediment control will need to be implemented during
construction. It is possible that rate control and stormwater treatment that
reduces pollutants and runoff will be required, especially with the development of
a transit station, park and ride facility, BRT, or other impervious surface.
The natural areas located within the D-1 Alignment are home to vast array of
wildlife. Care should be taken to avoid impacts to the habitat and travel ways of
all wildlife, including endangered, threatened, or special concern species.
As the proposed project has the potential to impact areas within large parks and
natural areas, and areas adjacent to Bassett Creek, the corridor would need to
be studied for the presence of historic and cultural resources. The historical
significance of the Theodore Wirth Park Chalet should also be considered in this
study. The City requests to be contacted if archaeological discovery is made.
Station Location
If the D-1 Alignment, consisting of either Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Bus Rapid
Transit (BRT), through Golden Valley is selected to be evaluated in the DEIS,
one station location must be chosen. The potential station locations for the D1
are Golden Valley Road near Wirth Parkway and Plymouth Avenue near Wirth
Parkway. Both are located in the City of Golden Valley and would require the
acquisition of property owned by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board.
Prior DEIS information indicates that the Golden Valley Road station would serve
mostly Golden Valley residents and businesses and the Plymouth Avenue station
would serve mostly Minneapolis residents, businesses, and Wirth Park facilities.
Businesses served in Golden Valley include regional destinations (Courage
Center, Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Regency Hospital of Minneapolis, Wirth
Park) and local destinations (Church of St. Margaret Mary, Unity Christ Church,
The Family Partnership).
While a station located at Plymouth Avenue would likely have less effect on
Golden Valley neighborhoods and community resources, the Golden Valley Road
station would provide more direct access for Golden Valley residents and
businesses. In addition, the Golden Valley Road location is on an existing bus
line with potential feeder bus connections, and has planned regional trail
connections.
The City would like more detailed information about how buses would be
incorporated into the station areas, including the amount and frequency of feeder
buses serving the stations, and information about how bus drop-off and pick=up
would function at the stations.
The City does not envision parking options at either station location. The location
of both proposed stations within natural areas seems to preclude possible
parking options. The City would like more detailed information about how parking
is being studied to function at the station locations, as well as potential costs that
are associated with parkland acquisition for parking. The City would like to know
how many parking spaces would be necessary at each location and whether or
not parking ramps are being considered for the sites. If there were to be
insufficient onsite parking at station locations, and transit riders park on the
surrounding streets, an access and traffic management plan should be
considered as part of the project.
As the City understands it, there are no plans for a park and ride facility at either
station location. Current land use and zoning controls that are currently in place
at the proposed station location sites do not allow parking that is not associated
with park uses. Changes to land use and zoning controls would need to be made
by the City Council. Surrounding landowners have expressed concerns about
their existing parking conditions so the integration of public and private parking
improvements could be an opportunity for further study.
The trip generation from the proposed station or a future park and ride facility
may result in the need to modify, enhance, or expand the nearby transportation
system, which includes roads, trails and sidewalk facilities. It is expected that the
County would partner with the appropriate road authority to address and mitigate
any traffic concerns.
Sidewalks currently serve both station locations. The existing sidewalk system
may need to be upgraded or expanded to meet accessibility design requirements
and the needs of the community. It is expected that this would be accomplished
as part of the site access evaluation and implementation. The City of Golden
Valley owns and maintains concrete sidewalks on both sides of Golden Valley
Road (CSAH 66) at the intersection of the proposed Transitway. In addition,
Three Rivers Park District has identified the Golden Valley Road corridor for the
proposed Bassett Creek Regional Trail which would connect French Regional
Park and the Medicine Lake Regional Trail to Wirth Regional Park and the trails
along the Grand Rounds National Scenic Byway. This network of trails and
sidewalks would complement LRT or BRT to improve multimodal transportation
in the area.
The City owns and maintains an asphalt trail near the BNSF railway in the Mary
Hills Nature Area. This trail provides an important north-south connection from
Golden Valley Road north into Robbinsdale via Sochacki Park. It is anticipated
that a new Transitway may impact this trail and the City requests that it be
actively involved with any reconstruction or realignment of this trail.
The costs to reconstruct Golden Valley Road and the existing multi-modal
facilities discussed above, in addition to any facilities deemed necessary to fully
meet the anticipated needs, must be considered in evaluation of the potential
station location.
Property Impacts
The Bottineau Transifinray would impact surrounding properties. There is
information that addresses property value impacts for properties located adjacent
to transit station locations. However, there is no comparable data that
demonstrates impacts to properties along the Transitway with no convenient
access to a station. Data should be provided that shows how the Transifinray
would impact single family residential properties along the corridor.
The potential noise and vibration impacts from the Transitway and the freight
track are a significant concern. While current and possible future freight rail traffic
also create noise, it is different from constant and consistent noise associated
with a regional transit system. BRT and LRT may yield different noise and
vibration levels in surrounding neighborhoods. These effects should be studied in
greater detail. The City would also like to have more information about the
presence of potential sound walls and other barriers that may cause visual
obstructions to surrounding properties.
With high frequency transit service, the potential Transitway and transit station
will have a visual impact on surrounding properties. Most notably will be the
addition of lights and lighting that does not exist with the current freight rail. The
effects of lighting should be studied and the screening of adjacent neighborhoods
and park areas should be considered as part of this project.
Community Resources
The proposed Transifinray and transit stations would likely require an increase in
community resources such as police, fire, public works maintenance, and traffic
management. Since the proposed transit system is managed by the Metropolitan
Council, it is anticipated that Metro Transit Police will be the primary law
enforcement agency at the station.
The City of Golden Valley owns watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer
facilities in the area of the proposed route. Some of these facilities cross under
the existing BNSF railway. Record drawings and other information are available
in the City's engineering office to assist in the planning and design of the project.
The City requests that it be consulted on all design and construction
considerations and field decisions involving City-owned utilities.
The City of Minneapolis owns a 48-inch watermain which passes under the
BNSF railway north of Golden Valley Road and Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services owns a large sanitary sewer interceptor which parallels
the BNSF railway in Wirth Park. The City requests that it be consulted along with
the custodial agency on all design and construction considerations and field
decisions involving these utilities.
The County's project consultant estimated that as many as fifteen Xcel Energy
transmission line towers may need to be relocated as a result of the proposed
Transitway. The City's Right-of-Way Management Ordinance currently requires
that any proposed reconstruction, relocation, or replacement of overhead utility
lines over 300 feet be buried underground. This code requirement may apply to
this situation.
Many areas of Golden Valley have substandard soils which are unsuitable for
construction without proper correction or engineering. A good portion of the
Transitway corridor through Golden Valley is located within floodplain, lowland, or
wetland areas. In addition, there are areas in Golden Valley that were found to be
filled with construction debris or hazardous materials in the past. The City
requests that a careful and detailed analysis of the soils be included as part of
the project.
The City of Golden Valley respectfully requests that these concerns be addressed in a
sufficient manner, and that they become part of public record associated with the
Bottineau Transifinray Draft Environmental Impact Statement. As stated before, the City
recognizes the regional significance of transit in the northwest metro area, but remains
concerned over the significant impacts that the D-1 Alignment would have on Golden
Valley. Thank you for working with the City to address these concerns.
Respectfully,
Shepard Harris, Mayor
Mike Freiberg, Council Member Paula Pentel, Council Member
DeDe Scanlon, Council Member Joanie Clausen, Council Member