03-08-04 PC Agenda
AGENDA
GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chambers
Monday, March 8, 2004
7pm
I. Approval of Minutes
February 9, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting
II. Informal Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat (Minor Subdivision) SU14-11
Applicant: Ronald & Victoria Rath
Address: 6909 Medicine Lake Road
Purpose: To divide the one existing lot into two lots in order to construct a
single-family home on the newly created lot.
III. Informal Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat (Minor Subdivision) SU09-06
Applicant: David Alan
Address: 808 Westwood Drive South
Purpose: To divide the one existing lot into two lots in order to construct single-
family homes on the two newly created lots.
IV. Informal Public Hearing - Planned Unit Development - Calvary Lutheran Church
PUD No. 46, Amendment #5
Applicant: Calvary Lutheran Church
Address: 7520 Golden Valley Road
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a 4,300 square foot music wing
addition.
-- Short Recess --
V. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City
Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings
VI. Other Business
VII. Adjournment
.
e
Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall
Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday
February 9,2004. Chair Pentel called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Chair Pentel and Commissioners Eck, Keysser, McAleese and
Rasmussen. Also present were Director of Planning and Development, Grimes
and Administrative Assistant, Lisa Wittman. Commissioner Groger w
Ie
I. Approval of Minutes
January 26,2004 Planning Commission Meeting
Eck noted several miscellaneous typographical and gr
corrected.
MOVED by Rasmussen, seconded by Keysser
approve the January 26, 2004 minutes with the
rri unanimously to
oted by Commissioner Eck.
II.
Informal Public Hearing - Co
Applicant:
Address:
Purpose:
for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a
car wash on the northeast corner of Boone Avenue
ed that in 2001 there was a Conditional Use Permit issued
d rebuild of the existing gas station currently located on the
own and rebuild never occurred so the Conditional Use permit
originally the store was proposed to be a BP company store but that
a franchise store.
Grimes d that the City is reconstructing the Boone Avenue TH 55 intersection.
In order to accommodate the reconstruction, the City needs right-of-way from BP for the
widening of Boone Avenue. BP will need variances issued from the BZA because ot the
need for additional right-ot-way for Boone Avenue.
.
Grimes explained the current proposal and said that it is similar in some ways to the
original proposal. The most significant changes are the traffic configuration and access
points and the fact that they will no longer offer repair service. He said that BP is
proposing a double car wash and six gas pumps as compared to a single car wash and
eight gas pumps in their previous proposal. He said that the City Engineer has reviewed
the plans and said that there is enough room on the site for the double car wash lanes.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
Page 2
He explained that BP is giving the City a 40-foot easement to provide for a berm along
the creek and to help improve the flooding situation in the area. Pentel asked if the
berm is to keep water away from the station rather than to hold it on the station
property. Grimes said yes and explained how the berm and pump system would work
as a levee. He said that there is a need for variances on three sides of the property and
that there will be a sidewalk along Boone Avenue. Pentel asked if the City would
maintain the sidewalk. Grimes said yes.
.
Eck asked how many parking spaces would be taken away in front 0
the fact the cashier's visibility can not be restricted. Grimes said 0 0 0 spa
the most would be taken away and suggested that the applica ress
cashier area would be located in the store. Pentel referred t n
that showed where the cashier area would be located. Grim t th
parking spaces and 12 spaces available at the pumps for a t
feels is an adequate number of spaces for the site.
plans
re 16
s, which he
Pentel asked if there is an outdoor vacuum and
on this plan. Grimes said he wasn't sure and su
e being proposed
sk the applicant.
Pentel asked how much outside storag
foot sidewalk being proposed in the fr .
storage or display is allowed. Grim
limitations on the amount of out .
the pumps and if the five-
re w d be adequate if outside
tlat there should be some
She said she would like a
times. She asked if they
flat lenses that are flush
gas station is desig to
that the car wash doors be closed at all
beer, if the outdoor lighting fixtures would use
anop r lenses that would create spillover and if this
y one person at night.
nting Golden Valley BP explained how this proposal
uested in the past. He said that the convenience store
store with convenience foods and that it would not have the
ean Coffee shop located inside the store. He explained that
o car wash bays in order to keep up with the amount of cars and
.
to the new accesses into the site and said that they didn't like losing
two acces but the right turn in off of Boone Avenue will function quite well and the
turning radius would be fine for the tanker trucks. He talked about the proposed car
wash and said there would be plenty of room to stack cars for the car wash. He referred
to the proposed berm and said it would function as a levee to store water and keep it
from rising and going back on the property and the intersections. He pointed out on the
site plan where they are proposing to put the vacuum system and said it was in the far
corner closest to Highway 55, which is the noisiest part of the site. He explained that
the car wash would operate with the doors closed except for when the blowers are on
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
. Page 3
drying the cars. He said that the canopy is not designed yet but that the intent is to have
area lighting only with shoebox type fixtures and to not have light spilling horizontally.
Pentel noted that the signage being proposed is over the allowed limit according to the
Sign Code and stated that any time there is a lit BP logo it would have to count as part
of the signage on the site. Kosmas said they would work that out with the Sign Code
requirements. Grimes added that directional signs don't count against the amount of
signage they are allowed.
Kosmas referred to the front sidewalk dimension and stated that it w
because the owner was not intending have outdoor display or sal
the store. He asked if the Planning Commission was going to p ..
the size of the front sidewalk that it be seven feet in width in
to use the sidewalk in front for display or sales purposes. P
sidewalk at the front of the store have five feet of open space
because often pallets are put on that front sidewalk ar:d$
sidewalk space being proposed doesn't seem to
pass one another or for a handicapped person t
companies often have stacked storage with fou
that that area is not intended to be used fo
size
of
IIing
like
at the
storage
h feet of
for two people to
Kosmas said that
sidewalk in front of it and
.
Grimes asked Kosmas if there would b
Kosmas said he didn't know, but t
products in that manner.
ed on the pump islands.
ave a tendency to market
Pentel asked Kosmas if th
thought the owners wou
would be stored. Grimes
propane tank. Kos sa'
operations are very
ropane sold at this site. Kosmas said he
d showed on the site plans were the propane
t wou be a propane exchange program or a
would be an exchange program and that his client's
n operations.
Pentel asked if
they woul
typicall
as going to be selling beer and cigarettes. Kosmas said
beer. Grimes said that selling 3.2 beer and cigarettes aren't
K
loca
of the
for securi
he site plans and discussed where the cashier area would be
ained that typically the desire is to have the attendant be able to see all
t that this site would have video controlled cameras at the pump islands
rposes.
.
Pentel asked if the gas station and car wash would be open 24 hours per day. Kosmas
said that the pumps would probably be open 24 hours per day for credit card fueling,
but that they would not be attended 24 hours per day. He said that the car wash would
probably not be open 24 hours per day in case it malfunctioned.
Rasmussen asked Kosmas if he would be amenable to a 7 -foot wide sidewalk in the
front of the store. Kosmas explained that right now the sidewalk is not set up for
.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
Page 4
displaying and storing products. He said that if the Planning Commission were going to
tie a condition regarding outside storage to the sidewalk width he would ask for it to be
seven feet. Rasmussen asked if the sidewalk were 7 feet wide if the parking spaces in
front would have to be moved. Kosmas said that he would probably move the building
two feet to the east rather than moving any parking spaces. Pentel said she would
encourage an eight-foot wide sidewalk in the front of the store.
Keysser asked if the old underground tanks were going to be pulled out and new ones
put in. Kosmas said the old tanks would be taken out and that there wi atform
built underground to store the new tanks on and they would then be n so
that they could not sink or float due to poor soil conditions in the
Pentel asked if the car washes would use treated City water
into the storm sewer. Kosmas said yes, they would use stric
would go into the sanitary sewer system.
Keysser asked if the car wash would be touch fre
said he thinks it will be touch free.
Pentel opened the public hearing. Seeing
hearing.
ntel closed the public
Pentel said she thinks the propos
during the remodeling that the ~
nice that the vacuum is sitting i
driving down Highway 55
vacuuming out their car
concerned about outside
on the site is great the
if She said her only concern is
ed with outside storage. She said it is
r'the site noise wise, but as people are
to be able to see people cleaning and
f life, but is not very aesthetic. She said she is
ut th 'mproving this building and the water storage
Ie car wash will provide a real good service.
ould offer diesel fuel. Kosmas said no.
g the combined projects of the Boone Avenue/Highway 55
y BP work would take. Grimes said that construction would
d that they want to do the project while the access is restricted
ction of Boone Avenue.
Commissioners how they felt about the outdoor storage and display
Keysser he appreciates the point of storage in the front restricting the walkway but he
thinks it is standard to display things like windshield washer fluid on the pump islands.
. Grimes added that he thinks it is a good suggestion to say that if they want to have
sales/storage area in the front of the store that the sidewalk should be 8 feet wide.
Pentel said she thinks the Commission should say what dimension they would like to
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
. Page 5
see the sidewalk to be and have the applicant follow that recommendation if they
choose to display items for sale on the sidewalk in front of the store.
Grimes asked how high things being displayed on the sidewalk in front would be
stacked. Kosmas said that that the window line is sitting at 32" above the sidewalk
surface, which is standard and that has been part of the reason that the owners were
against displaying and storing products on the front sidewalk.
Pentel elarified that if there were outside storage and display, the mini
open sidewalk space should be five feet and that storage and displa
be stacked more than three feet high.
d that
canopy
f Review.
Grimes stated that the Building Board of Review would be re
the review of the lighting plan would be done by that Board.
design would be done by the time this proposal goes to the
Kosmas said yes.
.
MOVED by Keysser, seconded by McAleese an
approve the request by Golden Valley BP to op
and car wash facility in the Commercial Z .
McAleese added for the record that this
are required for a Conditional Use Per
animously to
ation, convenience store
e conditions listed below.
ts the ten conditions that
1. The site, building and engin
become a part of this approv
Design and dated 1/12/
1/12/04; Preliminary
Anderson Engineerin
Anderson Engin g a
and dated 1/12/
dated 9/12/
itted by the Golden Valley BP shall
elude: Site Plan prepared by KK
Elevations prepared by KK Design and dated
e and Erosion Control Plan prepared by
e / 04; Preliminary Utility Plan prepared by
ed 1/12/04; Landscape Plan prepared by KK Design
urvey prepared by Egan, Field and Nowak and
2.
. ns between the gas station attendant and the customers,
outdoor speakers.
3.
itations on hours of operation.
4.
endations of City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, as found in his memo to
es dated January 29, 2004, shall become a part of this approval.
5. The recommendation of Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson, as found in his memo to
Mark Grimes dated January 29, 2004 shall become part of this approval.
.
6. Any signage for the building and site shall meet the requirements of the current City
Sign Code.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
. Page 6
7. Outdoor lighting shall be designed and used in such a way to minimize unnecessary
light spillover.
8. The variances requested by Golden Valley BP must be acted on by the Board of
Zoning Appeals before this recommendation is sent to the City Council for action.
9. Prior to the issuance of the actual CUP permit and building permits, BP Products
North America and/or EFP LLC (dba Golden Valley BP) shall execute and deliver
the Easement Agreement to the City.
is proposed subdivision would take the 20 to 30 small lots that are
iew Heights now and consolidate it into three lots. Two of the lots would
then be r ed when the Golden Ridge PUD is finished. He stated that the north 1.65
acres of the site would be maintained as open space and that the part of the site that
was primarily used for the shooting range is where the housing units are to be located.
He added that as a part of this plat a section of Wheeler Blvd will be vacated at the
request of Hennepin County.
10. Five feet of sidewalk area in front of the store shall remain op
type of stacked display items or for sale items (such as fire
windshield washer fluid, etc.) Also, items in this area sha
three (3) feet.
11. All other state, local, and federal requirements shf4
12. Failure to comply with one or more of the ab
revocation of the CUP.
.
III.
Informal Public Hearing - Pre!'
Applicant:
nsolidation) SU20-03
Address:
on the north, Flag Avenue on the east,
outh and Hillsboro Avenue on the west
Purpose:
of epin County property into three lots. (Two of
come a part of the Bullseye Development, LLC for
sal is to consolidate all of the County's t~x forfeit and
er Sheriffs Pistol Range site located in the northwest
hat the Sheriff site will be block 1 and that it is where the
nter s currently located.
.
Keysser asked about the County's potential use of the northern half of Block 1 for
residential purposes in the future. Grimes said that the County could decide to sell the
property but that he didn't anticipate that happening because there are some drainage
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
. Page 7
issues and a pond on the site and that the trail system is connected on that property.
Rasmussen asked if the sale of the property has gone through yet. Grimes said the
sale is still pending but that the County Board is expected to approve it this month. He
said that the City has permission from Hennepin County to be the applicant for this
proposed subdivision and to go forward with this request.
Pentel opened the public hearing.
.
Ginger Zoubek, 9345 Naper Street, stated that the neighborhood do
to preserve as much natural land and tree space as possible and t e of t
have changed their minds regarding the development of the S s site
g.
Pentel asked if there were any changes proposed for lot 1.
communications area and there are no changes anticipated
additional space if the would have to add to the buildi m
Bill Berquist, developer for the Golden Ridge pr .
County Board meeting the previous week and t
the City.
was at a Hennepin
oved the sale of the land to
Andrew Geier, 1800 Independence Av
yard and asked if the there are pia
that Wheeler Blvd. is only a stre
because there is no need for it.
Wheeler Blvd. is his back
'more houses. Grimes explained
hat the City is vacating the street
Andrew stated that ther
that he doesn't anticipate
property in the nort t
the City thought it w
homes would
and water problems in the area. Grimes stated
ty dOl anything with that triangular piece of
of the site because of the soil conditions. He said that
te that portion of Wheeler and that only one or two
cation.
eler Blvd. is vacated it would make it easier for the County
ouses on the site in the future and that leaving Wheeler Blvd.
uld mean that houses could not be located on that portion of the
'd that the property is zoned Institutional and in order to put homes
ve to be rezoned.
McAleese fied that the County could ask for Wheeler Blvd to be vacated at any time
if they wanted to change anything in the future.
Seeing and hearing no one, Pentel closed the public hearing.
.
McAleese stated that the consolidation is pretty straightforward and complies with State
laws.
MOVED by McAleese, seconded by Eck and motion carried unanimously to
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
. Page 8
recommend approval of Lakeview Heights Plat 2 subject to the following conditions:
1. The final plat of Lakeview Heights Plat 2 will be consistent with the preliminary plat of
Lakeview Heights Plat 2 prepared by Bonestrooo Williamson Kotsmith and dated January
12, 2004.
2. The comments in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, to Mark Grimes, Director of
Planning and Development, and dated February 2, 2004 shall become a part of this
approval.
Grimes stated that this is
just discussed for vie
approval of the prell
consists of 16 s a
two single-fam' ,
family ho ' .
the Cit
of the si
3. The City Council will determine the amount of a park dedicatio e
to final plat approval.
4. A variance from the Subdivision Code requiring that all p
standards be issued for Lakeview Heights Plat 2 because
on Lot 1 does not meet zoning code standards for
t Zo' Code
rking lot setback
zoning district.
IV.
Informal Public Hearing - Planned Uni
Applicant:
olden Ridge PUD No. 98
.
Address:
Area bounded by
Naper Street 0
rth, Flag Avenue on the east,
llbIUsboro Avenue on the west
of 7 twin homes and 2 single family
Purpose:
that I be located on the same property that was
ts Plat 2. Grimes explained that this is the request for
sign approval for Golden Ridge PUD No. 98 which
treet (Gettysburg Court). He said that there will be
mes and that the remainder of the lots would be two
. h will be developed by Habitat for Humanity. He added that
deed from the State of Minnesota to use the northern part
oses.
d at each half of a lot has its own property line and that the property
amily Residential and is guided for Low Density (less than five units
e Comprehensive Plan Map.
.
Pentel asked why Lot 2 isn't being rezoned to park land. Grimes explained that the City
will have a conservation easement over that lot and that the State's use deed allows it
only to be used for public purposes. Pentel said this thinks that in order to count it as
park space it should be zoned properly. Grimes said the City would like the area to be
passive green space rather than an official park space because very little is going to be
done to that part of the property.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
. Page 9
Grimes said there would be homeowners association and referred to the draft bylaws
that the Commissioners received with their agendas. He added that the neighbors
wanted to that have a homeowners association to create cohesiveness with the rest of
the neighborhood.
Keysser referred to the draft copy of the homeowner's association document and asked
if any of the property on the site was going to be commonly owned by the residents.
Grimes said none of the property would be commonly owned but that the City has
recommended having an association to be sure there is continuity in th . cture
and to take care of common issues such as garbage haulers, snow treet
maintenance.
.
Rasmussen said she felt like the association is slightly discri
the fact that there are going to be Habitat homes. Pentel sa
of the things prohibited in the proposed bylaws such as no cl
Grimes said that Habitat for Humanity has said that s f
associations similar to the one being proposed. H
surrounding neighborhood all would like to see
added that she thinks an association is way to h
Eck referred to the Habitat for Humani
design, materials and quality of constr
Grimes stated that there is a repre
this meeting and suggested tha
the developer, would want to m
rate homes as well becau
ow the City knows that the
Sl liar to the market rate units.
at for Humanity in attendance at
issues. He added that Mr. Berquist,
uality is comparable to the market
Pentel stated that she kn
asked if the ones b r
Grimes said they ha
ablt omes don't always include garages and
as part of this development would have garages.
ave two car garages for each unit.
Pentel asked if
Grimes s
individ
ance of the yards would be done by the homeowners.
rstanding that the yard maintenance would be done by the
e trails located on the site. Pentel asked if the proposed trails
Grimes said that it hasn't been decided yet. He stated that there would
'ees planted on each lot and that the pond on the site would be
he pond already on the Sheriff's site and then they would drain to the
.
Rasmussen asked if the existing trees on the east side of the site were going to be
preserved. Grimes showed an aerial photo of the site and said he wasn't sure how
many of the trees on the east side would be saved once construction starts.
Pentel asked if there would be a park dedication fee required. Grimes stated that park
dedication is usually a factor when new lots are being created but that in this case the
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
. Page 10
number of lots is actually being reduced and that is something the City Council would
need to decide because a major part of the PUD would be dedicated as open space.
Pentel asked if the proposed homes would have basements and sump pumps. Grimes
said he believed there would be basements and that there has to be a place provided in
order to install a sump pump.
Berquist stated that he is a 35 year resident of Golden Valley and that he is one of three
investors in the Golden Ridge Development from Golden Valley. He s . ey are
preserving as many trees as they possibly can. He explained that th d to
have some market rate housing in it to offset the cost of the land ed
dramatically from when they first started looking at the site. He n a
volunteer with Habitat for Humanity for several years and th s with
the quality of work they do. He added that all of the window by
Andersen Windows and that there are several professional c the area
that would be volunteers.
.
Pentel asked how the Habitat homes would be
homes. Berquist recommended that Ryan Karri
address that question. He said that the Ha .
market rate homes.
rom the market rate
Habitat for Humanity
blend very nicely with the
Pentel asked which lots would hav
the site plans and stated that th
that the first homes on the right
said the remainder of the I
single-family will be at th
on them. Berquist referred to
r Street would be Habitat homes and
nt he site would be Habitat Homes. He
r the market rate two family homes and the
ul-de-sac.
Pentel asked if the
going to be a trail ri
that want to bu
buying the market rate homes know that there is
house. Berquist said yes, and that he has 12 people
eowners association bylaws and asked for the definition of
uist explained that they created the draft bylaws using bylaws
t development and that "common element' is a common wall or
. w,e added that having a homeowners association keeps things like
om becoming a City issue.
.
Eck aske e homes would have different appearances from each other. Berquist
said there wouldn't be a significant noticeable difference and that the exteriors of the
homes would be virtually the same. Eck asked what would happen if a roof needed to
be replaced. Berquist said that something like that would have to be approved by the
homeowners association. He added that there would be eight votes by the Habitat
homeowners and eight votes by the market rate homeowners in the association.
Grimes asked if the intention is to have an assessment to maintain things like roofs and
driveways in case they would need to be replaced at the same time. Berquist said yes
because they want to keep the same look throughout the entire project.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
Page 11
.
Ryan Karris, representing Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity stated they have over 17
years of experience and have constructed 550 units of housing. He said they are a
licensed general contractor and utilize licensed trades people and they utilize volunteer
labor where appropriate. He stated that this homeowners association does offer a
variation since it does not have any common property and therefore the focus is on the
architectural details and use controls fol" the entire area. He added that Habitat has
participated in 22 of these types of developments, six of those have associations and
three have mixed income housing.
.
Pentel asked whatthe usual tenure is of a Habitat homeowner an ' 0
maintenance issues are handled. Karris said they are seeing a ntion
90%. He said that Habitat for Humanity does retain the mort ha
about 2% of the homes come back to them and that there i % f
rate. He explained that Habitat homeowners must do 300-50
partly to achieve a higher understanding of how a ho 0
maintenance escrow account that can only be us
beyond the building code requirements and inst
energy efficient appliances in their houses.
r
ee
c osure
t equity
ey require a
s and that they go
ventilation fans and
Pentel asked if Habitat for Humanity e
Karris said they have both in house ar
Pentel asked if the houses bein
build basements wherever they
have basements. Karris said they
nd showed pictures of a similar unit.
Pentel asked how many
can be two, three or four
t l[oposed units would have. Karris said there
s by c:~nging the floor plans slightly.
Keysser asked Kam
"common ele "
shared drivew
associati
ommon element" and asked if a driveway is a
one of these proposed houses will have common,
id they are open to discussion about the elements of the
. concerned with the association and particularly them not having any
. erquist said that their lawyers are discussing that topic. Grimes
of subdivisions have covenants. Keysser said he thinks that the bylaws
are a pretty intrusive set of standards that he finds troubling. Berquist
d take that under advisement.
.
Eck asked if Habitat for Humanity remains the owner of the homes. Karris said no, the
mortgages are written and held by Habitat for Humanity. Eck asked if owners have to
sell their homes back to Habitat for Humanity. Grimes said that a Habitat homeowner
could live in a house for thirty years and pay the mortgage off or pay the mortgage
early.
Keysser asked if the homeowners would be getting equity build-up. Karris said yes and
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
. Page 12
that the loans are given at zero percent interest so every payment goes toward principle
and that the sales of the homes are based on the appraised value.
Pentel opened the public hearing.
hat part of the reason the density increased is because of the City's
uch open space on the site. Pentel said she thinks maintaining
is crucial and she still has questions as to how that open space should
s said he could talk to the City Attorney and see how he feels about
rezoning I . ntel said the City has other recreation areas that aren't parks and that it
seems cleaner to her to have the property zoned park land.
Ginger Zoubek, 9345 Naper Street, asked if a Habitat homeowner were to pay their
house off would they have to sell it back to Habitat for Humanity. Pentel said it is her
understanding that if they payoff the mortgage they could sell their home privately.
Zoubek said that the neighborhood still feels the same as they always d that
most of them don't want anything built on the property. She said ther a 10
reservations specifically with having such a high concentration of bl orne
that the task force agreed on 12 single-family homes. She add at
homes being proposed is not reasonable.
Seeing and hearing no one. Pentel closed the public hearing.
Keysser said he thinks this is a fine project and it
Rasmussen said she agreed with Commissione
see the City require the homeowners asso .
that she would not like to
is PUD.
.
McAleese said he would be against re
but historically for the zero lot line
in place to solve disputes.
he woe project have an association
o be some sort of a mechanism
Eck said he knows the us
for a long time. He aske
increased the density. G
this proposal and t
funds.
ent of this site has been under consideration
'Iy the increase in the cost of the land that
It wa ifficult to find other funding assistance for
no costs the City is bearing other than some CDBG
selling the land to the applicants at its cost. Grimes said
.
Keysser asked if the City is spending money on Block 2 for the proposed trails. Grimes
said there may be some City funds used.
MOVED by Eck, seconded by Keysser and motion carried unanimously to recommend
approval of the preliminary design plan for Golden Ridge PUD #98 with the following
conditions: .
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
February 9, 2004
. Page 13
1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval.
These plans consist of the following: Golden Ridge PUD No. 98 Preliminary Plat
prepared by Bonestroo and dated January 12, 2004; Setback Drawing prepared by
Bonestroo and dated January 12, 2004; Existing Conditions Plan prepared by
Bonestroo and dated January 13, 2004; Preliminary Grading Plan dated January
13, 2004 and prepared by Bonestroo; Preliminary Utility Plan dated January 13,
2004 and prepared by Bonestroo; Preliminary Landscape Plan dated January 13,
2004 and prepared by Bonestroo; and Parking Plan dated January and
prepared by Bonestroo.
V.
2. The rough draft of the Bylaws of Golden Ridge Homeowne
become a part of this approval for initial review by Planni
City Attorney. Additional changes may be required.
3. All recommendations and requirements set out in t
Engineer Jeff Oliver to Mark Grimes dated Fe
this approval.
o from City
all become a part of
.
4. The final landscape plan shall be revie
Review or the City's Environmental
5. Only one solid waste hauler shall b
Golden Ridge
by the Building Board of
e 16 housing units within
6.
irements of the City's Sign Code.
7. The approval is subj
or laws with authority
tate, federal and local ordinances, regulations
ment.
-- Short Recess --
s o the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City
oning Appeals and other Meetings
I the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting and requested a
ode.
VI.
Grimes stated that due to the Envision Summit being held on February 23 the Planning
Commission meeting scheduled for that night would either need to be cancelled or
rescheduled. He said he would talk to the applicants to see if they have any problems
with changing the meeting date.
.
VII. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned 9: 15 pm.
.
Planning
763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax)
Date:
February 27, 2004
To:
Golden Valley Planning Commission
From:
Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
Subject:
Informal Public Hearing-Preliminary Plat of Rath White Addition -6909
Medicine lake Rd.-Ronald and Victoria Rath, Applicants
Ron and Victoria Rath are the applicants for the minor subdivision of the proposed Rath White
Addition. The Raths have entered into an agreement with the owner of the property (Patricia
. White) to subdivide the property into two lots. Proposed Lot 2 is the location of the house
owned by Ms. White at 6909 Medicine Lake Rd. She plans to continue living in this house.
Proposed Lot 1 is the proposed vacant lot where the Raths propose to build and house and
live. The property is located at the intersection of Medicine Lake Rd. and Sandburg Rd. along
the City's north border with Crystal.
The Raths have submitted all the information that is required as part of a preliminary plat. The
plat indicates that both lots exceed the minimum lot area requirement of 10,000 sq. ft. and the
lot width requirement of 100 ft. for a corner lot and 80 ft. for an interior lot. The preliminary plat
indicates that the lot for the existing house with proposed garage will meet the setback
requirements for the Residential zoning district. Proposed Lot 1 where the new house will be
located is triangular in shape with streets on two sides. The lot is almost 15,000 sq. ft. in area
but due to the streets and shape, there is a relatively small area for the construction of a house
that meets the setback requirements. However, an adequately sized house with tuck-under
garage can fit within the setback lines as shown on the preliminary plat. The garage now on
proposed Lot 1 will be relocated to Lot 2 prior to approval of the final plat.
There was an attempt to subdivide this property in a similar manner in 1993 but it was not
completed. However, a variance for the existing house was approved in 1993. This variance
makes the house legally non-conforming. It was determined at that time that the house was
into the front setback by .5ft. Because this variance was granted, the property can go forward
with the subdivision assuming that the existing garage is moved prior to final plat approval by
. the City Council.
There is no indication in the file when the house at 6909 Medicine Lake Rd. was constructed.
However, there was a building permit issued on the house as far back as 1956. The property
.
is currently zoned Residential (single-family) and guided on the General Land Use Plan for
Low Density uses. The property directly to the south is zoned Light Industrial and guided on
the General Land Use Plan map for Light Industrial uses. The property to the north in Crystal
is low density residential. About ten years ago, Sandburg Lane was made a cul-de-sac to
eliminate traffic using Sandburg Lane through the parking lot of Sandburg Middle School to
Sandburg Road. Sandburg Road now has access only from Medicine Lake Road and
provides access to several houses and businesses.
Factors for Consideration and Approval
Considerations for approving or denying minor subdivisions are set out in the Subdivision
Code, Section 12.50, Subd. 3. Staff findings on each of the nine points are as follows:
1. Proposed lots must meet requirements of the applicable zoning district. As stated
above, each of the two lots in the proposed subdivision exceed the minimum lot and width
size requirements for the Residential zoning district. Both lots will have full frontage on a
public street. The existing house at 6909 Medicine Lake Road is considered legally
nonconforming because a variance was granted in 1993 to allow the house into the front
setback by .5ft.
.
2. Minor subdivisions may be denied upon the City Engineer's determination that
steep slopes or excessive wetness encumbers the buildable portion of the
resulting new lot. City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, has written a memo to me dated
February 24, 2004 regarding this subdivision. The issue of steep slopes or excessive
wetness was not addressed in his memo because these concerns are not present on the
property.
3. Minor subdivision may be denied if public sewer and water connections are not
directly accessible to each proposed lot. As stated in the City Engineer's memo, there
are two sanitary sewer services available to the two lots. The existing house already has
water service. Providing water service to the new lot will be a challenge but it is possible.
4. Approval of minor subdivisions shall be conditioned on the applicant's granting of
easements for necessary public purposes as determined by the City. The City
Engineer has stated that standard easements along property lines will be required. In
addition, the property owner(s) will be required to provide a 12 ft. wide bike trail easement
to the County along the north side of their properties. This easement will have to be
granted prior to the approval of the final plat by the City Council.
5. When public agencies other than the City have some form of jurisdiction over an area
including or directly affected by a proposed minor subdivision, approval of that minor
subdivision may be conditioned on the requirements of the outside agency. In this case,
Hennepin Council has asked for the bike trail easement and the City will make sure that it is
provided as part of the platting process.
.
6. If the applicant is required to submit a review of the property's title, the approval of the
minor subdivision shall be conditioned on the applicant's resolution of any title issued
raised by the City Attorney. Prior to final plat approval, the City attorney will determine if it is
necessary to review title information.
2
.
7. Minor subdivisions of non-residential properties may be denied if the City Engineer
determines that adequate public facilities are not available to serve the site. This is
residential property so the provision does not apply.
8. Approval of a residential minor subdivision shall be conditioned on the payment of a
park dedication fee in an amount established by the City Council. The City Council has
the right to assess a park dedication fee at the time of final plat approval. Staff will recommend
that the City Council charge a park dedication fee of $1 ,000 at the time of final plat approval.
9. Refers to minor subdivision for double bungalows. This is not applicable in this case.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision of the Rath White Addition with the following
conditions:
1. The final plat of the Rath White Addition will be consistent with the preliminary plat
submitted with the subdivision application. The preliminary plat is dated Oct. 29, 1992 and
prepared by Lot Surveys Company, Inc.
2. The comments in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, to Mark Grimes, Director of
Planning and Development and dated February 24, 2004, shall become a part of this
approval. This includes the granting of easements to the City and Hennepin County.
. 3. A park dedication fee shall be paid in the amount of $1 ,000 prior to approval of the final plat
by the City Council.
.
4. The garage on proposed Lot 1 shall be removed prior to the approval of the final plat.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, dated February 24,2004 (3 page~)
Photos (3 pages)
Letter from James Grube, PE Director of Transportation Department, Hennepin County, dated
February 9,2004 (1 page)
Preliminary Plat (1-11 x 17 page)
3
..
.
----~-____J
.
z
m
~
------~___r c
)>
~
m
z
/;.\
,
",
z
m
~
)>
~
m
z
\
\
, /\
\, / \
\ / \
, //\
\ / \
\'( ~\
\\ \.
, '.
/"\\, \\~\
.\ \ \
",' I ,
I Subject Property:
MEDICINE LAKE RBEDICINE IUILUI
IEDICINE LAKERD MEDICINE LAKE RD MEDICINE LAKE RD MEDIC
SANDBURG RD
SANDBURG RD
\,
'......'
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Public Works
763.593.8030 I 763.593.3988 (fax)
Date:
February 24, 2004
To:
Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Enginee~
Review of Rath White Addition
From:
Subject:
Public Works staff has reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed Rath White
Addition, which is located on the south side of Medicine Lake Road and east of
Sandburg Lane.
Preliminary Plat
The property included in this subdivision currently exists as a single family lot with a
home on the lot. The driveway access for the lot is onto Medicine Lake Road. The
. proposed preliminary plat includes removal of the existing garage and installation of a
new garage south of the existing home. Driveway access for the existing home will
therefore be relocated to Sandburg Lane. In addition, driveway access for the new lot
being created by the subdivision will also be from Sandburg Lane. No driveway access
onto Medicine Lake Road will be permitted from these two lots.
The existing driveway aprons onto Medicine Lake Road must be removed and replaced
with concrete curb and gutter. The developer must contact the Hennepin County Public
Works Department for technical and permitting information regarding work in the
Medicine Lake Road right-of-way.
The developer will be required to obtain a City of Golden Valley right-of-way permit for
installation of the proposed driveway aprons on Sandburg Lane. The application
information for this permit is available in the Public Works Department.
The preliminary plat must be revised to include easements on all lot lines consistent
with the Subdivision Ordinance. According to the code, the drainage and utility
. easements on all street sides of the lots must be 10 feet wide, with 12-foot wide
easements centered on the common lot line between Lots 1 and 2, and a six-foot wide
easement on the east line of Lot 2.
G:\Developments-Private\Rath White Add\PrePlat Review 022404.doc
-
..."...
. This proposed subdivision has been reviewed by the Hennepin County Public Works
Department. County staff has indicated that Medicine Lake Road is identified in the
County bicycle plan as the location for a future bike trail. In order to accommodate this
trail, the developer will be required to dedicate a 12-foot wide trailway easement along
the Medicine Lake Road frontage of this plat. The developer must submit a legal
description for this easement to the City. The City will prepare the easement document
for signing, and have it recorded after the developer has signed the document. The
easement must be signed and be prepared for recording prior to forwarding the final plat
the City Council for approval.
Utilitv Service
There are two sanitary sewer services available to the property included in this
proposed subdivision. One of these services is currently being used by the existing
home. The second service is available for the new home that will be constructed.
The existing home on this property currently receives city water from Medicine Lake
Road that is connected to a water main owned and maintained by the City of Crystal.
There is no existing water service to the proposed Lot 1 .
.
Although there is a fire hydrant located at the intersection of Medicine Lake Road and
Sandburg Lane, water service for the proposed lot cannot be provided from the hydrant
lead. The minimal flow through a service from this line would not insure that fresh water
would be available to the home. Therefore, an alternative connection point to the
municipal water system must be provided.
There are two primary points where a water service could be extended from to this new
lot. The first location is a new tap into the existing water main in Medicine Lake Road.
This connection would require a wet tap into the main, coordination with the City of
Crystal, directional boring of the service under the street and a permit from the
Hennepin County Public Works Department. The second water source is a service
extension from a Golden Valley main that is located on the east property line of the lot
immediately west of the existing home. This service source will require a City utility
permit and a City right-of~way permit. In addition, the developer would need to submit
calculations indicating that the proposed service would provide sufficient flow into the
new home.
Other Issues
The construction of a new home on the proposed Lot 1 and the construction of a new
garage on Lot 2 will both require a City of Golden Valley Grading, Drainage and Erosion
Control Permit. Information regarding this permit is available atthe Public Works
Department.
.
G:\Developments-Private\Rath White Add\PrePlat Review 022404.doc
- """IIIIIIII"
.
.
.
Recommendation
Public Works staff recommends approval of the proposed Rath White Addition
preliminary plat subject to the comments contained in this review. Approval is also
subject to the review and comments of other City staff.
C: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Mark Kuhnly, Chief for Fire and Inspections
Gary Johnson, Building Official
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal
AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator
Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator
Eric Eckman, Engineering Technician
"
G:\Developments-Private\Rath White Add\PrePlat Review 022404.doc
.
Hennepin County Transportation Department
1600 Prairie Drive
Medina, MN 55340~5421
763-745-7500, Phone
763-478-4000, Fax
763-478-4030, TDD
www.co.hennepin.mn.us
February 9, 2004
Mr. Mark Grimes, Planning Director
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Re: Proposed Plat - Rath White Addition
CSAH 70, Southeast Quadrant Sandburg Lane,
Section 29, Township 118, Range 2,
Hennepin County Plat No. 2795
Review and Recommendations
Dear Mr. Grimes:
Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of
proposed plats abutting county roads. The Plat Review Committee reviewed the above plat at its regular
meeting on February 3, 2004. The following comments are provided for your consideration.
.
. The developer should dedicate a 12-foot wide trail easement, in conjunction with the typical drainage and
utility easement from and along the 33 foot CSAH 70 right of way. This action will help accommodate a
future trail, as designated on the City-approved Hennepin County Bikeway Plan, plus utilities, signage,
snow storage, etc.
. Hennepin County strongly supports the developer's proposal. to access Lot 1, and to close and relocate the
existing Lot 2 driveway, via Sandburg Lane. Minimizing turning vehicle conflict points on the County
Arterial System helps maintain motorist safety and roadway efficiency.
. All proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to
beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to access, drainage and utility construction, trail
development, and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 763-745-7601 for the appropriate permit
forms.
Please direct any response to Dave Zetterstrom at 763-745-7643.
Sincerely,
~Y),~
James N. Grube, P.E.
Director of Transportation Department
. JNG:ebalrqb
cc: Plat Review Committee - Byers/JohnsonlLindgren/HoltzlSmrckalZetterstroml Abene
Rob Wied, Hennepin County Surveyor's Office
Jay Oliver, Golden Valley City Engineer
An Equa/ Opportunity EIlIP/oyer
Recycled Paper
.
.
.
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
INVOICE NO. 32930
F. a. NO.
SCALE I." 50'
0... DENOTES I RON
MINOR SUBDIVISION
REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
7601 . 73rd A.enue North 560-3093
Minneapoiia, Minnesota 55428
APPLICANTS
RATH WHITE. ADDITION
~gDfJl QtrrflIua1t
Ronald R. Rath
Victoria A. Rath
Patricia J. White
PRELIMINARY PLAT
-NW ltqz.HC11. ~ HE: 1/4 -sev. 7.9 "1\\11'" 1Ie-,F ~ , . !
ic:z'-- ,...._I. __ .. . -1/7'--- :~~~~ . ----.e:~~u,. .. "~-'I<, *'_"'__ ___ _j _~ __ ,
,,~, · 1____ ,:
"",\~ 1<( I ~..~;~=:~T-~;~ ~~ 7,i:':~~~~~:'~c~ , ~.c c~I.~7~~~-
~, , . \ "j /, iiff B H~'"UM """'''''' :~ I'!~'
"I ,\!'-li ~ , 113 <7C-re>.v:.-1l. 1-ltlE--.
~ I "-i.. S41.'IS'5?>"e '~-_L..
"- / :";.'- . . LOT I Ie.
'" ;' '~ -"'.
~ ,. / . ~~-;,;. oj
.", I --..::......
MEDICiNE
LAKE.
ROAD
&:
"
"4
fl'q"~D
-rUt-1L -
Urioep.
28 15
li"l~
.~
;-.
LOT -2l
~ H"':;:-O!; =' r;:i~
. i ~ ~ ~ '~1----n~
..."- -~ I
\
i
.~
..;
\U
'"
1"Of'O g:;41"
U\y . ,,-z~. \0
..".........
5~
e:..~i'
\1)
I -z.
!~,..:
~S:~
<::l"r
~a .
..1l0~
"7 -.t-J
'.
-----.......... -
LOT AREA
D~
, L
C>
, ill
:z
:;
LOT I
14,926 SQ. FEET
l-
\!'
<I
....
LOT2
12,838 SQ. FEET
GARAGE TO BE RELOCATED
/'
/
'<...
~----!A t~ ;~ ,..::;;: ~;-:.- ~'C,2::;'';.~ '=::J:::.;;;=J:.:-~:t-g.-- :" ~
.. . ~ . 0' ~.
". I , tift: ..
'f.-. '<:
~ Idl~.". 1.13
~~..-
" .
"-, </0 ';'"c-
;;;~ N",;:. .~.
5 '~""-,. l'1t
....
/
I r _. . " ,.-
~. i
)i ... .~
III r'
"> ... .i
ii
c,
'24.0
o lJ
.J) ..J
.. ..
7.4-.0
"".6
EXISTING
n.~-
....~~
~I
:..t ('J
-=-C)
SlJi
.~
G_
\!"
'The only easements shown are from plats of reeotU or infonnarion provided by
cllenL
We t.enmy certify thaI this Is . 'RHl and _I _tlttion 01. su""'y 0' ,he
bounclari"" 01 lhe ahoYe descrlted land and the location 01 all buildings and vi..
Ibla """""""h.......,s. II any, from Or on salt! land. .
Sutveyedbyualhla~dayo/ O::tober 11 92
G.:l....p
&"'R~
'-...-..
~~~.....~
~""'.. "
-~(f...':
""'~(J~""",
'- . " 1//
SilD"d
".
I"~
.
.
.
.
.
.
lIey
Planning
763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax)
Date:
February 27, 2004
To:
Golden Valley Planning Commission
From:
Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
Subject:
Informal Public Hearing -Preliminary Sketch Plan to Subdivide 808
Westwood Drive South-Dave Alan, Applicant
Description of Minor Subdivision
Dave Alan of Dave Alan Homes recently purchased the house and property at 808 Westwood
Drive South in the North Tyrol neighborhood. The property is now part of the Kennedy's West
Tyrol Addition. Mr. Alan has applied for a minor subdivision in order to subdivide the property
into two lots with the purpose of constructing two new homes. This week, Mr. Alan demolished
the house that was formally located at 808 Westwood Drive South so the property is now
vacant. The house was built in 1941 with a garage addition added in 1950.
Mr. Alan has submitted the required information that is shown on the attached Certificate of
Survey prepared by Survey Specialists. The survey indicates that the property will be divided
into two lots that will be about equal in size. The total area of the property is 39,970 sq. ft.
Therefore, each lot exceeds the 10,000 sq. ft. minimum size requirement. In addition, the
proposed lots each are more than 80 ft. wide at the front setback line (35 ft. from the street) as
required by the zoning code. Each of the lots is large enough for houses similar to others in the
neighborhood.
Factors for Consideration and Approval
Consideration for approving or denying minor subdivisions is set out in the Subdivision Code,
Section 12.50, Subd. 3. Staff findings on each of the nine points are as follows:
1. Proposed lots must meet requirements of the applicable zoning district. As stated
above, the proposed two lots will exceed the requirements for lots as permitted in the
Residential zoning district.
2. Minor subdivisions may be denied upon the City Engineer's determination that steep
slopes or excessive wetness encumbers the buildable portion of a resulting new lot. A
memo from the City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE,to me dated February 27,2004 is attached. In
that memo, he does not refer to any problems related to steep slopes or excessive wetness.
In the case of these two proposed lots, there is a significant drop off from the front to the back
of the lots. However, the City Engineer does not think that this is a significant problem. Issues
related to site development concerns should be addressed as part of the Grading, Drainage
and Erosion Control permit that will have to be issued prior to construction starting.
.
.
.3.
3. Minor subdivisions may be denied if public sewer and water connections are not
directly accessible to each proposed lot. The City Engineers memo to me covers the
issues regarding sewer and water availability. One of the lots can use the existing sewer and
water connections formally used by the 808 Westwood Rd. house but a second lot will require
new connections.
4. Approval of minor subdivisions shall be conditioned on the applicant's granting
easements for necessary public purposes as determined by the City. In this case, the
City Engineer is recommending that the standard easements required by the Subdivision
Code be shown on the final plat.
5. When public agencies other than the City have some form of jurisdiction over an area
including or directly affected by a proposed minor Subdivision, approval of that minor
subdivision may be conditioned on the requirements of the outside agency. In this
case, there is no outside agency with any jurisdiction that would have any interest in this
subdivision. As indicated in the City Engineer's memo, the Metropolitan Council may have to
give permission to allow direct access to one of its trunk mains depending how sewer access
is provided to the second lot.
6. If the applicant is required to submit a review of the property's title pursuant to Subd.
4(C) of the Subdivision Code, then approval of the minor subdivision shall be
conditioned on the applicant's resolution of any title issues raised by the City Attorney.
Prior to final plat approval, the City Attorney will determine if it is necessary to review title
information.
7. Minor subdivisions of non-residential properties may be denied if the City Engineer
determines that adequate public facilities are not available to serve the site. In this case,
the provision does not apply.
8. Approval of a residential minor subdivision shall be conditioned on the payment of a
park dedication fee in an amount established by the City Council. The City Council has
the right to assess a park dedication fee at time of final plat approval. Staff will recommend
that the City Council charge a ,park dedication fee of $1 ,000 at the time the final plat is
approved. The recommended fee is $1,000 for each new lot created in excess of the number
of lots that were previously located in the area of the new subdivision.
9. Refers to minor subdivisions for double bungalows. This is not applicable in this case.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision of the property at 808 Westwood Drive
South into two lots with the following conditions:
1. The final plat of 808 Westwood Drive South will be consistent with the Certificate of Survey
prepared by Survey Specialists.
2. The comments in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, to Mark Grimes dated
February 27, 2004 shall become a part of this approval. The memo includes the requirement
to dedicate certain easements.
The fences that are not correctly located on the Dave Alan property shall be removed prior to
final plat approval.
4. A park dedication fee shall be paid in the amount of $1 ,000 prior to the approval of the final
plat.
2
.
.
.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, dated February 27,2004 (2 pages)
Preliminary Plat (1 page)
3
.
~
UJ
w
3:
~I
I
STRAWBERRY LN
JANAL YN CIR
/
//
-f
/
/
--.
\
SUN8~,.
~~G
UJ
tr
Q
Q
o
o
"~
~94 r.
o N8 Li
'7&1(Y100 8
VY100 S
'.",
~^. ..
I~
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Public Works
763.593.8030 J 763.593.3988 (fax)
Date:
February 27, 2004
To:
Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer ~
Preliminary Plat Review: 808 (f;:~od Drive South
From:
Subject:
Public Works staff has reviewed the proposed preliminary plat for 808 Westwood Drive
South. The preliminary plat is located on the west side of Westwood Drive between
Strawberry Lane and Ravine Trail. This proposed subdivision consists of splitting a
single lot into two separate lots. The existing home on the lot will be demolished, and
two new homes will be constructed.
Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat must be revised to include drainage and utility easements on all
property lines as outlined in the subdivision ordinance. This includes 10-foot wide
easements along the plat boundaries and a 12-foot wide easement centered on the
property line between Lots 1 and 2.
The driveway access for both of the new lots will be from Westwood Drive. The
developer will be required to install City standard driveway aprons for both driveways. A
City right-of-way permit must be submitted for this work.
The preliminary plat indicates that the existing fence surrounding this property
encroaches beyond the southwest property line into the adjacent North Tyrol Park and
onto private property to the south. The developer will be required to remove this fence
from park and private property as part of this subdivision.
Utilities
The existing home on this property is connected to city water with a service from
Westwood Drive. Sanitary sewer service is provided by a service lateral from the
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) trunk sewer main that is within
the park just west of the property. These are currently no sewer or water services
available for a second home. In order to provide water service to the second lot in this
subdivision, a service must be extended from the water main in Westwood Drive.
G:\Developments-Private\808 Westwood\PrePlatRvw022704.doc
..
.
.
.
There are two options available for second sanitary sewer service. The first option is to
tap into the MCES trunk main in North Tyrol Park. Installation of this service would
require a permit from MCES, and a City right-of-way permit, and includes the potential
for impacts to the existing trees on the lot due to trenching.
The second sanitary sewer option is provided in Westwood Drive. Based upon the utility
records for the sewer in Westwood Drive, it appears that the main is deep enough to
provide a gravity service to the southern lot in the subdivision. Because the developer
must excavate Westwood Drive to install a water service for this lot, the installation of
sanitary sewer in the same trench may also be the most economical alternative
available.
The developer should investigate both of the sewer service options discussed above to
determine which will work best for this subdivision. The specifics for the sewer service
plan must be included in a plan submitted at the time an application is made for sewer
and water permits.
Other Issues
The construction of homes on the two lots being created by this subdivision will be
subject to the City's Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Ordinance and Tree
Preservation Ordinance.
Recommendation
Public Works staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat at 808 Westwood
Avenue South subject to the comments contained in this review, and the comments of
other City staff.
C: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Mark KUhnly, Chief of Fire and Inspections
AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator
Gary Johnson, Building Official
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal
Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator
Eric Eckman, Engineering Technician
G:\Developmen~-Private\808 Westwood\PrePlatRvw022704.doc
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY\
./~
./ ./ ./ ...\
./ 1\
./ e
./ 0 I
./ ~
./ 0
././ I
./
, ./
./
./
./
I ././
\ ././
./
I ././
\ ././
./
\././
f
I
\
\ ..
I"
I
I'
I
AS-SURVEYED DESCRIPTION:
LOT 8 AND lHE SOUlHERLY 1/2 LOT lD.
ffl(lIIT Ie REAR. IllOCK 12, ~YS
'/lEST nllOl HIUS, HENNEPIN COUNTY.
IAN
LOT MlfA:' 38.840% S.F. (0.817 AC)
lNFORIIATlON PROWlED BY QJENT.
T OR COUNTY TAX INFORIIATlOII:
1LE RESEAACH COIIDUCTEO.
LOT ~?-'O
'1-"''''
..~
.~,
:S~...
<:P
,/
,/
/
COT ,.A;
'y//@
/ {j
/ '"
. / '"
,~ '" '"
"~
.\-,.
"
'"
'"
'" %
'y/
~ / ->~"-
~ FENCE ~/-- i' ":>
//~~---; ~i" #'
~ I \ / ~~
~/ \ / J .J.
/ V ~n"
I
I
I
LOT
'"
"
-.
\
\
llQIa1HlS SURVEY IS FOR lHE SOLE BENEFIT or
_._ ................ ~ ,.nr.nI'\DATlnid~ Aun/nA PII.ATlF'SNAUm lHEREON.
AND STANDARD or WORK FOR SUR'IEYOR BASED UPON
"HORIIAL" STANDARD of CARE REQUIRED BY LAW
@ ~~s;t~~ ~J1:~
\
5 0
z
8
t
d
(II
.
==
(II
0>
U.
(II
::E
1
I
\
\0
'~
..;....
p-FR
~
N
~
8
~FJ.RING c:.~ A~JUm
SCALE IN FEET
o
20
40
.
60
WlWl-
X SPIKE (NAiL) SET
. IRON MONUMENT FOUND
o IRON PIPE SET
;IS.. NAIL Ie BRASS OISK SET
X88.0 SPOT ELEVATION (ADD 800 FT)
VERTICAL DATUM, NOVO 1,928 (~0WJm BY CI~
DAVE ALAN
ADD
CITY
PHONE
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
1241
I HEREBY CER1I'Y lHAT 1HIS DRAWNC REPRESENTS
lHE RES.R.1$ OF' A SUIt\'E"t PREPARED BY WE
at BY THOSE UNDER NV DIRECT SUPER'ttSfOH
AND I AM A DULY uc::E1i5ED Pft(ftSSKlNAL SURVEYOR
UNDER mE LAWS Of' 1IE STA1EOF' t.t\NNESOTA
~&lJn>n
lI\ RPIlr.rAlJS'l'S
.\NC\~ _lNlOllElICRlI'lIONS
.~ln'AlCIllG.SI&lMII(IfPt.A1'S
KEHNElH G.' HOl.MBECK
UltMESOTAREGIS1RA1lOH "!lQ. 188ID
~xu."a"""""'AlIIl3ID)lI4-Ol11
CBdllIt.... ...-n P.G. toll-...
"ME1IlO- _ IfIoo9l7t MIl ...........,.
"fit
--;;
.
lIey
Planning
763.593.8095/763.593.8109 (fax)
Date:
March 1, 2004
To:
Golden Valley Planning Commission
From:
Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
Subject:
Informal Public Hearing on Preliminary Design Plan for Amendment No.5,
Lutheran Church-Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 46
.
Background
On October 21,2003, the City Council approved Amendment NO.4 to the Calvary Lutheran
Church PUD No. 46. The purpose of Amendment NO.4 is to allow for the construction of a
four-story north wing to be used for offices, classrooms and childcare; removal of the existing
administration wing on the east side of the building in order to allow for an expanded narthex
and gathering space outside the main sanctuary with more space for youth ministries on the
lower lever; and changes to the parking areas necessary due to the new construction.
Calvary will begin construction on these improvements later this week after they are issued
building permit for demolition and foundation construction. As part of the review of
Amendment No.4, it was noted by Calvary and shown on their plans that they had several
future additions planned for the campus that they were not prepared to go forward with last
fall. These additions include a new chapel near the intersection of Golden Valley Rd. and
Pennsylvania Avenue, a columbarium, a parking deck over a portion of the parking area
north of the building along Pennsylvania Avenue, and the construction of a music wing
attached to the southwest corner of the building.
At this time, Calvary is now ready to go forward with the music wing and they are requesting
an Amendment No.5 to PUD No. 46 to allow its construction. It is anticipated that the
construction of the music wing will occur at the same time as the other improvements to the
church. The music wing will be added to the southwest corner of the church adjacent to the
sanctuary. It will be a one-story, 4,300 sq. ft. addition without a basement. It will contain offices
for the music staff and replace the basement auditorium being demolished by the overall
Calvary improvements. The new auditorium will seat 100 choral members and be primarily
used for small performances and rehearsals.
. Qualification as a PUD
Because this is an amended PUD, the City does not have to go through the process to
determine if the proposal meets the test to be a PUD. In this case, this determination was
made in 1984 when the site first became a PUD. Since that time, four amendments have been
.
made that have permitted expanded uses at the Calvary campus consistent with the overall
nature of a large church campus. However, with each change or amendment, the City has the
right and obligation to review the proposed changes to insure that they are consistent with
good planning principals and the proposal will have a positive impact on the community as a
whole.
'"
Planning Issues for Amendment No.5
In this case, Calvary did provide the City with information about possible future expansions
with Amendment NO.4. At that time, it was noted that a music wing would probably be
proposed in the future to help Calvary enhance its strong music program. The future came
more quickly than originally anticipated and they are now ready to amend the PUD to allow its
construction.
As part of the review of Amendment NO.4 that will take the building square footage of the
Calvary campus from 97,000 sq. ft. to 245,000 sq. ft., there were many concerns that were
addressed including parking, traffic generation, noise from outdoor worship services, design
of the building, landscaping, tree preservation, water quality and storm water retention, utility
issues, and fire department issues. The proposed Amendment No.5 will have a minor impact
on the campus and the issues discussed by staff; Planning Commission and City Council as
part of the Amendment NO.4 review are minimally impacted by the music wing.
The affect of Amendment No.5 on the following issues are discussed as follows:
.
Traffic Generation-The issue of traffic generation was discussed in great detail at the time
of Amendment No.4 consideration. At the cost of Calvary, the City hired Glen Van Wormer,
PE, from Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) to prepare a traffic study. The study found that the
overall expansion of the Calvary campus would have minimal traffic impacts on the existing
street system in the area. The internal site circulation was also reviewed by SEH and the City
Engineer to insure that it was work as smoothly as possible at peak time.
The proposed music wing is replacing an existing basement auditorium that is used for
practice. It should not significantly increase traffic to and from the church campus.
Rehearsals are already taking place in the church. If this space is used for performances,
they will be small and not held at the same time as the church services.
Parking - Parking spaces in the lot south of the church will be reduced by one as a result of
the music wing construction. This is a very minor change and will not have an overall impact
on the church parking situation. With the reduction of one space, the church will have a total
of 300 spaces on their campus with another 172 spaces off-site with long-term lease
arrangements for a total of 472 spaces. Code requires a total of 466 spaces for a church with
a sanctuary seating 1,400 persons.
The parking lot and driveways will have to be altered in order to accommodate the music
wing. The parking area will be moved about 12 ft. to the south. New curb will be placed in
the area along with the restriping of the lot.
. Design and Placement of Building - This will be a one-level building with no basement. It
will be made of similar brick to compliment the existing church building. All roof top
mechanical equipment will be screened. A building elevation will be presented at the
2
.
Planning Commission meeting. The building will be setback from the west property line the
same distance as the existing church building.
'.
Landscaping - A revised landscape plan for the area around the new music wing will have to
be provided as a part of the General Plan of Development. This will consist of mostly
landscaping around the base of the building.
Engineering Department Issues - City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, has written a memo on
issues related to public works issues. His comments will become a part of the
recommendations of this memo. His memo does recommend that no additional ponding be
required for the church campus due to the new 4,300 sq. ft. music wing. However, he is
recommending an environmental manhole to help reduce sediment runoff from the site. There
is also a recommendation regarding directional signage for the driveways coming off Golden
Valley Rd.
Fire Department Issues - Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson has attached a memo to me
dated February 19, 2004 listing his comments regarding Amendment NO.5. These are
standard comments and they will be made a part of the recommendations of this memo.
.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The plans for the 4,300 sq. ft. music wing will be an important addition to the church in
order to provide new space for music rehearsals that will be lost when the basement
rehearsal space is eliminated as part of the overall improvements to the church. The music
wing will seat up to 100 persons and will be primarily used for rehearsals by the choir and
other musical groups from the church. It will not add to the seating capacity of the
sanctuary on which the parking requirement for the church is determined. The parking lot
and access to the front of the church off Golden Valley Road will be changed slightly to
accommodate the music wing. Two of the driveways from Golden Valley Road will be made
either one way in or one way out to improve traffic circulation in the area. Staff is
recommending the following conditions:
1. The plans submitted with the application and prepared by BWBR Architects shall
become a part of this approval. The plans are dated February 2, 2004.
2. The findings and recommendations found in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver,
PE, to Mark Grimes and dated March 1, 2004 shall become a part of this memo.
3. The memo and comments from Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal, to Mark Grimes and
dated February 19, 2005, shall become a part of this memo.
4. The conditions of the PUD approval for Amendment NO.4 shall remain in place and be
included in final approval of Amendment NO.5.
Attachments
Location map (1 page)
Memo from City Engineer, Jeff Oliver dated March 1,2004 (2 pages)
. Memo from Deputy Fire Marshal, Ed Anderson date February 19,2004 (1 page)
PUD Permit #46, Amendment#4 (4 pages)
Site plans prepared by BWBR, dated February 2,2004 (8 oversized pages)
3
.
//
/' /\,
./~,,~
/.~<\)~
/;::~O
/~~;/~~/.,
-- --- . ./
--------=:~_.::---~
------::=-----===-----
~-~:.-----
~,r\to>/
\. . . - -:"...--G'"" '.
i'--~- . __ I~"
hi !, I ~ "1 \, ,;\ --<o~C€-i
01. ~ . .'~ ~ _,'-==-6€ll)J
~ L ~ ~.-'O)----:'GO~
{\' ~ '" ___ / D,
~ -.. i . I > I. _~~-:~-~~~~.UI \
I . ~. /' /- 1C.~
QI _J--" m \---.---- '__-. o\.9~
.---.t ~a O~)' .
"ii~i!>Y~;T""'~~--- . . ~
[I jl~~~.
1 ~, j~
J - _! ~I~ I ~
---. ZI '-- r-:lJk<
'. m - "- (m
'-f --- ----.-.-, ) Z
-- -- --------~
-- .-----.. > .----~ HiGHW'- ~__
---~-< ..- ___~~~__~,_~x Ss--:::::.-~_.__, __.___,_~_
--~---------------~ ljIl -- --
t: [----______ ----___________ -
~ 1--~1"----'r--,-~WAY55'
'. / !1~~~~='[--f- CLJ f-~I--=i EE ~
"..... I I: ~. ,HO rs rH6EiJfSt~ {HOENIXM ~~ 1
t <- > or- /~/.
" /~---. cic. ~ . 0 <i: V./ /z
' ./--~-- J ~ '.~ ~ ~ / />*
/ ! r I w--'-l~--~ -- ~ ttl / /~/ ~
~'r( /_U~I.:ti - "~-. . . '. ...... ~..;::~/- J
JI~r.~~E- -=:::--. -. /-,f>iIC ~
" -'- f> ~ /.;;/ L~L
-. - "- . - T~ RIBAUL 1 51 :::.~/ '11 FARIBAUL T St
_~~~~z~ , z
c-Cj,'OffiAVE N I,~~=====-?~
I. '//' 10
; ~~/' m
I ! ~- J.
/~ ! 1/' C!n
/~ l:e
.;g, - I
~" 'z 1
~~ / ~ r-
......y m
" Z .
)
(/
)
......'.,
/
'l. /___.
( /
.",---~.-,/--"""-------",,/
r:::::-
~I Subject Property:
au lRUW"-D ~l~....~ /f"JiCLUTt,
rr~1ilt~}.~/~L
I ~-~ r:G'~fi4>"'.. ,
f-_tr I f-'1' ~
---- ,- r- _ ,- r /~ ~~~~""~1
c L -1 ---~~~-Hf~.
HIG~-::~~-5~:'------- - .- ---- __~:_-~'__~..~
---"- y '\-
,-------,-----"l _______ ~ \
L
.
,.
.
lley
Memorandum
Public Works
763.593.8030 I 763.593.3988 (fax)
Date:
March 1, 2004
From:
Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer ~
Preliminary Design Plan ReVi~ned Unit Development No. 46
Amendment Number 5, Calvary Lutheran Church
To:
Subject:
Public Works staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Planned Unit Development
(PUD), Amendment Number 5, for Calvary Lutheran Church. The church is located on
the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Valley Road and Pennsylvania
Avenue.
.
Site Plan
The proposed PUD amendment consists of an addition to the southwest corner of the
existing church. Minor modifications to the parking lot on the south side of the building
are also proposed. The proposed parking lot revisions include relocation of the curb line
closest to the building further south into the parking lot, and minor modifications to the
curb islands and radii within the lot.
Staff has been working with Calvary on installation of three on-street parking stalls
between the eastern driveway entrance and Pennsylvania Avenue. The parking stalls
were approved by the Council with the condition that Calvary limit turning movement in
and out of the three parking lot driveways. In the most recent correspondence with
Calvary, the Public Works Department has offered to install the required signs and bill
the labor and material costs to the church. As of today, staff has not heard from Calvary
regarding the installation of the signs, including the offer for staff to install them. Based
upon this information, staff recommends that the Preliminary Design Plan for this PUD
amendment not be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration until the signing
issue at Golden Valley Road and the Calvary driveways is resolved. A satisfactory
resolution would be for Calvary or the City to install the agreed upon signs.
Utilities
. The sanitary sewer and water services to the existing Calvary facility are adequate to
provide service to the proposed addition included in the PUD amendment.
G:\Developments-Private\Calvary PUD Amendment\Amendment 5\Prelim Review 030104.doc
. Gradina. Drainaae and Erosion Control
This site is within the Mainstem subdistrict of the Bassett Creek Watershed, and is
therefore subject to the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission (BCWMC) Water
Quality Policy. This policy includes installation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for
the removal of sediment and nutrients from storm water runoff before it is discharged into
Bassett Creek.
As discussed in the October 16,2003 PUD review, runoff from much of this site will be
routed through a water quality pond located in the northwest corner of the church
property. However, runoff from the portion of the site that is included in this PUD
amendment is discharged into the City storm sewer system without any treatment for
nutrient or sediment removal. Therefore, the church will be required to install an
environmental manhole on the existing storm sewer line prior to its exit from the site. This
environmental manhole should be located as close to Pennsylvania Avenue as possible
in order to aid in maintenance. Calvary will be required to enter into a Storm Water
Facility Maintenance Agreement for this environmental manhole.
The existing storm sewer on the southern half of the site is shown incorrectly on the base
maps used for the PUD plans. The discrepancies in the existing storm sewer system
must be shown correctly on the plans submitted for the PUD General Plan.
.
A Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Permit will be required for this work. This permit
must be obtained prior to the start of any work on this portion of the site.
Summary and Recommendations
Public Works staff recommends approval of the preliminary design plan for the proposed
Calvary Lutheran Church Planned Unit Development, Amendment Number 5, subject to
the following conditions:
1. Installation of signs at Golden Valley Road and the Calvary driveways is
resolved prior to forwarding the Preliminary Design Plan to the City Council
for its consideration.
2. The existing storm sewer system is illustrated correctly on the plans when
submitted for the General Plan review.
3. Subject to the review and comments of other City staff.
C:
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Mark Kuhnly, Chief for Fire and Inspections
AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator
Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator
Eric Eckman, Engineering Technician
Gary Johnson, Building Official
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal
.
G:\Developments-Private\Calvary PUD Amendment\Amendment 5\Prelim Review 030104.doc
.
.
.
Public J!~y
Memorandum
Fire Department
763-593-8055 I 763-512-2497 (fax)
To:
Mark Grimes, Director of Planning & Zoning
From:
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal
Subject: PUD 46, Amendment #5, Calvary Church Preliminary Plan
Date: February 19, 2004
cc: Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire & Inspections
The Golden Valley Fire Department reviewed the preliminary plans for PUD 46, Amendment #5 for
the music wing addition. Listed below are the fire department's comments:
1. The proposed music wing addition shall be designed and constructed in accordance with
The 2003 Minnesota Fire Code.
2. According to the proposed plan, the painted fire lane curbs shall be painted yellow and the
"no parking fire lane" signs shall be installed in accordance with the city ordinance.
3. The proposed music wing addition shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler
system and be interconnected with the building fire sprinkler system.
4. The performance and rehearsal proposal for this music wing space shall meet the
requirements for an A assembly occupancy.
5. The turning radius and access for the fire department access road for the south parking
lot shall meet all current fire code standards.
.
.
.
P.U.D. #46, Amendment #4
City Council Approval October 21.2003
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Use Permit for
Planned Unit Development
Project Name:
Calvary Lutheran Church of Golden Valley
Address:
7520 Golden Valley Road, 831 and 835 Pennsylvania
Avenue North. Golden Valley. Minnesota
Legal Description: Lot 1,2, 3,4,5, Block 1, Calvary Lutheran Church, P.U.D.
No. 46
Applicant:
Calvary Lutheran Church of Golden Valley
Address:
7520 Golden Valley Road. Golden Valley. Minnesota
Owner:
Calvary Lutheran Church of Golden Valley
Address:
7520 Golden Valley Road. Golden Valley. Minnesota
Zoning District:
Institutional (1-1)
Permitted Uses:
Uses permitted in this Planned Unit Development are a
church, church offices, child care facilities, and parking
related to these uses.
Components:
A.
Land Use Component:
1. Land uses within P.U.D. No. 46 shall be limited to those uses indicated
on the approved General Plan P.U.D. Plans for Calvary Church
. prepared by BWBR Architects and dated 9/12/03. Principal uses shall
include all those uses normally considered as part of the operation of a
large church congregation including a child care center (including
"drop-by" child care.) Until final construction is completed on the main
church buildings, the two child care houses at 831 and 855
Pennsylvania Avenue North will continue to be used for child care
houses will be removed and the area converted to the use shown on
the General Plans.
.
2. No outdoor use of amplification for voice or music will be permitted
except as follows:
a. Outdoor services using amplified voice and music will be permitted
on a trial basis during the year 2004. During this year, up to three
services may be conducted each week between the hours of 10 am
and 9 pm. Additional outdoor events or services during 2004 may
be permitted with notification given to the City at least 72 hours
prior to the event with assurances from the Church that noise levels
would be consistent with other outdoor services in 2004. Such
services are permitted for the purpose of determining whether it is
possible to develop such reasonable, objective and measurable
noise standards as are needed to protect nearby residential uses
from the adverse effects of amplified sound that have been
experienced in the past. The Church will also notify all property
owners located north of the railroad tracks between Pennsylvania
Avenue North and Sumter Avenue North up to and including
Phoenix Street.
.
b. Upon development of such proposed objective and measurable
noise standards, the applicant may submit proposed standards to
the City Council for administrative approval. If the City Council
determines that such proposed standards, or any modifications to
such proposed standards deemed appropriate by the City Council,
are adequate to protect nearby residential uses from the adverse
effects of amplified sound, the Council may administratively amend
this condition to allow the use of amplification for voice or music on
such conditions as the Council determines are reasonable and
necessary. During the testing the consultant will involve the
residents, Church and City in the process.
3. The use of any of the church property for a columbarium would require
an amendment to the P.U.D.
4. The General Plans indicate future uses for a chapel, music auditorium
and parking deck. These and other expansions would require an
amendment to the P.U.D.
.
5. Parking for P.U.D. #46 shall consist of 301 open parking spaces on
site as shown on the attached General Plans and 172 parking spaces
on the United Properties office building site across Golden Valley Road
from the P.U.D. site area made available from Calvary Lutheran
Church by means of a cross parking agreement concluded with the
Northland Company, dated November 28, 1979.
.
.
.
6. Landscaping materials shall be adjusted or trimmed to maintain
visibility of windows and doors for security purposes.
7. Special precautions shall be taken during and after construction to
protect against erosion, silting, excessive grading, or any other
conditions detrimental to the area. Grading shall be done in a manner
so as to avoid dirt storage, disturbing of trees, or other activities
beyond the prescribed construction limits.
8. Signage shall conform to the City of Golden Valley Sign Code.
B. Circulation Component:
1. Drives, parking areas and walks shall be located as indicated on the
attached General Plans. The findings and recommendations found in
the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE to Mark Grimes, Director
of Planning and Development dated October 16, 2003 shall become a
part of this approval.
C.
Subdivision Component:
1. All requirements of the subdivision component have been completed.
D. Services and Facilities Component:
1. The P.U.D. shall meet all requirements and recommendations of the
City Building Inspector, City Fire Marshal and City Sanitarian. The
memo and comments from Ed Anderson, City Fire Marshal to Mark W.
Grimes, Director of Planning and Development, dated September 25,
2003 shall become a part of this approval.
2. The findings and recommendations of City Engineer, Jeff Oliver, PE,
as related to construction of services and facilities found in his memo
to Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated
October 16, 2003 shall become a part of this approval.
It is hereby understood and agreed that this Use Permit is a part of the City
Council approvals granted on October 2, 1984, April 5, 1988, September 5, 1989,
August 6, 1991 and October 21, 2003 relative to Planned Unit Development #46.
..
.
.
.
Witness:
Witness:
Witness:
Calvary Lutheran Church of Golden Valley
By:
Title:
Date:
City of Golden Valley
By:
Linda R. Loomis
Title: Mayor
Date:
By:
Thomas D. Burt
Title: City Manaqer
Date:
Warning: This permit does not exempt you from all other City Code provisions,
regulations and ordinances.