08-22-05 PC Agenda
AGENDA
GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chambers
Monday, August 22, 2005
7pm
I. Approval of Minutes
August 8, 2005 Planning Commission and Environmental Commission Joint
Meeting
II. Informal Public Hearing - Final Plan of Development - PUD No.1 00 - North
Wirth Business Center
Applicant: KRJ North Wirth LLC
Address: Lot 1, Block 2, North Wirth Parkway - located on Dahlberg Drive
Purpose: The PUD would allow for the construction of an office condominium
project totaling 31,500 square feet comprised of six buildings, phased
over time
III. Informal Public Hearing - Minor Subdivision - SU09-08 - Lawn Terrace
Estates
Applicant: Peter Knaeble
Address: 25 Lawn Terrace
Purpose: The Subdivision would create five separate lots in order to keep the
existing home and to construct four new homes.
-Short Recess-
IV. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City
Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings
V. Other Business
Advance notice of future agenda items.
VI. Adjournment
.
Joint Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission and Golden Valley Environmental
Commission
August8,2005
Hackett asked if a
Commission. Lunds
that they are n
different a enc .
to give
hearin
A joint meeting of the Planning Commission and Environmental Commission was held
at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Conference Room, 7800 Golden Valley Road,
Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, August 8,2005. Planning Commission Chair
Keysser called the meeting to order at 6 pm.
Those present were Planning Commissioners Cera, Eck, Hackett, Keysse Rasmussen,
Schmidgall and Waldhauser and Environmental Commissioners Baker. . ershot,
Kuentz and Pawluk. Also present was Director of Planning and Deve k
Grimes, Planning Intern, Aaron Hanauer, City Engineer, Jeff Oliv
Coordinator, AI Lundstrom and Administrative Assistant, Lisa
I. Joint meeting with the Environmental Cc>mmissio
interests.
Keysser stated that he and Baker called this joint
common interests between the Planning Commi
and asked the Commissioners to introduce the
s some of the
onmental Commission
.
Baker reviewed the Environmental Co
advisory group to the City Council and
be attended to rather than going s
explained that they are an
or less find issues they think should
nces state.
Waldhauser asked if the Env'
stated that they are not co
year.
omml ion is contacted by citizens often. Baker
. ents frequently, maybe about 3 or 4 times per
. sue if it first goes to staff or the Environmental
t typically, environmental issues go through him and
responsibility, they are sometimes referred to a
ded that the Environmental Commission could also be asked
ordinances such as lighting or parking before the public
anning Commission.
nvision Golden Valley process has given them more marching orders
in the last five years.
.
Keysser exp ained that the Planning Commission is also an advisory group to the Council
that looks at land use and zoning issues. He stated that the Planning Commission has
been taking the Zoning Code, chapter by chapter, and redrafting it. He explained that the
Planning Commission holds public hearings on development proposals before they go on
to the Council for final approval and that a lot of what they do has an environmental
impact. He stated that Golden Valley is fully developed but that there is a lot of in-fill
developments and they want to look at the environmental impacts. He stated that Hackett
has been a champion of trying to develop design criteria which includes environmental
issues.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
August 8, 2005
Page 2
. Baker stated that in addition to the in-fill developments there is also the fate of the
remaining open space, lighting issues, impervious surface issues, parking, bikeways, etc.
Hackettasked who authored a recent Buckthorn article that he read. Hill explained that
the change in the ordinance started with citizen input from residents that wanted to help f
control of Buckthorn. Grimes added that the tree preservation ordinance is another
ordinance that the Environmental Commission helped draft.
Rasmussen asked if the Planning Commissioners aren't specialists, how they would get
input on development projects. Grimes explained that the there is a de t review
process that proposals go through at the staff level and the staff dete ther
agency should review the proposal.
Keysser suggested
each other up to dat
agendas.
Cera asked if it would make sense to add a layer to the proc
to bring their proposals to the Environmental Commission fo
Baker stated that the Environmental Commission has
at agendas and going to meetings and getting in~
added that having the Planning Commission us
be helpful.
about looking
. er and Lundstrom. He
Commission would
.
Keysser said he would like to have mor
He stated that Oliver's staff reports ar
Commission's review process an
come to Planning Commission
ve agenda packets earlier.
d helpful in the Planning
nvironmental Commissioners
at the public hearings.
Kuentz stated that he doe
barrier in the process bu
vironmental Commission should be another
e up with a way to be part of the process.
issioners from each group call each other and keep
'ng reviewed or proposed. Cera suggested sharing
ental Commissioner speaking at a Planning Commission
rily represent what the whole Environmental Commission feels
roposal.
Grim
followe
ordinances.
process.
at there is also a 60-day review process for proposals that has to be
t it is really the Planning Commission's job to implement the City's
eysser agreed that he did not want to add delays to the development
.
Kuentz stated that the lighting ordinance would be a good issue to work on because it is
not part of a specific development project under a time constraint.
Keysser stated that if the Planning Commission does come up with design standards he
would like to Environmental Commission's input. Baker asked how far the Planning
Cera stated that there is nothing wrong with meeting the code requirements, but there is
also nothing wrong with exceeding them and that sometimes just asking the developer
questions can get things done.
.
Grimes explained that the Rudy Luther Toyota development is what
Council to start looking at writing a lighting ordinance. He stated t
working on researching other city's lighting ordinances.
Hanauer discussed some of the information he has learned
discussed how some cities have looked at creating lighting zo
height levels, etc. He talked about the Illumination En .
and the Dark Sky Association and stated that the I
people are used to is not necessarily the amou
Hanauer stated that the cities of Bloomington a
lighting ordinances in place. He stated th
offered to come and give a presentatio
rch. He .
urfews,
cle North America
amount of lighting that
a eeded for safety.
ave the most complex
ke with in these cities have
Hill asked if some of the cities Iigh .
of lighting. Hanauer said yes a
zones that different cities use
designed to minimize the amount
arious types of fixtures, wattage and
Kaisershot asked if any
on howtheir ordinances
from Plymouth said
Commissioners go 0
place.
uer researched had any comments or feedback
ng. Ha auer stated that Barb Sennes, Planning Director
ance is working well. He suggested that the
f some of the cities that have lighting ordinances in
of technical information in the Plymouth ordinance and asked
staff who can analyze their development plans to make sure
. ements. Hanauer stated that the Illumination Engineering Society is
m g their model to make it easier to read and follow such as using
foot candles. Grimes added that staff could require that lighting plans be
ghting consultant.
Baker said he thought working on the lighting ordinance would be a great place to start
and that a presentation to both the Planning Commission and Environmental Commission
would be nice.
. Grimes stated that the City Manager has said that the lighting ordinance needs to be
written by a consultant because no one on staff is an expert but that the Commissioners
should express their concerns to a consultant.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
August 8,2005
Page 4
. Keysser asked if a consultant was going to be hired this year. Grimes stated that there is
money in the budget for writing this ordinance that the Council feels that this needs to be
in ordinance format.
Rasmussen stated that there hasn't seemed to be too many huge concerns about lighting
and she would be interested in knowing what some of the concerns are because she
doesn't want to make it more difficult for people to do developments.
Grimes stated that a lighting plan is something that he can see being required as a part of
a developer's submittal. He said that he would report back to the Coun s that the
lighting ordinance is something these commissions would be looking
The joint Environmental Commi
Keysser asked how they can develop a way to get the Environ
on proposals.
Pawluk stated that he liked the idea of the Commissioners 10
not to be a watchdog group that responds to every de'
he and Oliver do their staff reports based not onl
guidelines and the Bassett Creek Watershed re
y Code and
u om added that
J but also other federal
.
Keysser asked the Commissioners to agr
it would be great to have the Council Li
meantime, they could be looking at ea
about any concerns they might ha
I meeting. Baker added that
. Grimes added that in the
s on the website and talk to staff
g Commission meeting ended at 7 pm.
(19 Commission Meeting
Coun'"!iI Chambers
7pm
I.
'ng Commission Meeting
M
th
conded by Rasmussen and motion carried unanimously to approve
inutesas submitted.
to the APA Zoning Practice article regarding infill developments that was
mailed to t m with their agenda packet. Grimes stated that he would like to have the
Planning Interns study this infill article and ordinances because the Metropolitan Council
has said that we have to be able to house the one million more people expected to live in
the metro area in the near future.
. Keysser asked Grimes if he could get the Commissioners some information on the recent
Supreme Court decision regarding condemnation. Grimes said he would find some
information and get it to the Planning Commission.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
August 8, 2005
Page 5
. Keysser reminded the Commission that at their last meeting they talked about discussing
potential redevelopment opportunities at the Golden Valley Shopping Center and the
corner of Highway 55 and Winnetka.
Grimes stated that the Golden Valley Shopping Center owners have talked about
redeveloping the bookstore part of the property but that they haven't submitted anything
to the City yet.
Hackett referred to a perspective drawing done during the Area B Task Force study and
asked Grimes if he could bring it to the Planning Commission. Grimes ould try to
find the drawings.
Hackett suggested the C'
developing design ard
presentation to the
Rasmussen asked if the City could require PUD applications t
Grimes said yes.
ards.
Keysser stated that the shopping mall was the number one c
asked if there are any funds available to help clean u
any of the tenants.
ision and
r without losing
.
Eck stated that the Golden Valley Shopping Ce
nothing wrong with the stores in the shop
rundown.
other him and that there is
aid it looks out of place and
Rasmussen asked what the City c
didn't know if the City can really
looks. Eck asked what the ow
would still like to see-what
standards. Grimes stated that he
rce the mall owners to change how it
Id be to improve it. Keysser said he
with rry Petit, the former Mayor of Wayzata, about
es thought Mr. Petit would be happy to give a
ission.
-Short Recess-
II.
gs of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City
rd of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings
III.
No other business was discussed.
.
IV. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 pm.
.
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
Date:
August 18, 2005
To:
Planning Commission
From:
Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
Subject:
Informal Public Hearing on Final Plan of North Wirth Business Center-
PUD No.1 OO-KRJ North Wirth LLC, Applicant
At the June 21 ,2005 City Council meeting, the Council unanimously approved the Preliminary
Plan for the North Wirth Business Center PUD No. 100. The Preliminary Plan allows for the
development of six office/condominium buildings to be constructed in phases. The approval of
the Preliminary Plan had six conditions as indicated in the attached copy of the City Council
minutes from the June 21, 2005 meeting.
.
Since the approval of the Preliminary Plan, Rick Martens, developer representative, has
submitted revised plans that address the concerns raised by City staff at the time of
Preliminary Plan approval and the six conditions of approval of the Preliminary Plan. These
revised plans have been reviewed by the staff including City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, and Ed
Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal. Updated memos are included from both ofthem.
.
Recommended Action
The final plans that have been submitted for the North Wirth Business Center PUD No. 100 are
consistent with.the plans recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and
approved by the City Council on June 21, 2005. They will allow for the construction of six
office/condominium buildings in ,phases. However, the construction of the entire parking lot and
utility systems must be completed as part of the first phase of development.
Staff recommends the approval of the final plan for the North Wirth Business Center PUD No;
100 subject to the following conditions (that would eventually become a part of the ordinance
approving the Final PUD plan and the PUD Permit):
1. The following plans shall become a part of this Final Plan approval: Site Plan dated
7/11/05 prepared by the Design Partnership; Landscape Plan dated 7/11/05 and
prepared by the Design Partnership; Building Elevation Sheet dated 7/11/05 and
prepared by The Design Partnership; Grading Plan dated 7/29/05 and prepared by
Paramount Engineering; and Utility Plan dated 8/02/05 and prepared by Paramount
Engineering.
2. The recommendations found in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, to Mark
Grimes dated August 16, 2005 shall become a part of these recommendations
.
.
.
3. The recommendations found in the memo from Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson to
Mark. Grimes dated August 15, 2005 shall become a part of these recommendations.
4. The plantings and sod indicated on the Landscape Plan shall be completed around
each building after construction of the building. Prior to construction of the buildings,all
areas shall be seeded with at seed mix acceptable to the City Engineer. The area that is
seeded shall be maintained in a manner as to not allow the growth to exceed 8 inches
in height.
5. The areas along Dahlberg Drive (between the parking lots and the street and east of the
southernmost building pad) shall have sod laid at the same time as the landscaping is
done around the first building.
6. The area north of the railroad tracks shall be placed in a conservation easement with
the City of Golden Valley. Development of the area north of the tracks may only occur
with an amendment to the PUD and amendment to the conservation easement.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver dated August 16, 2005 (3 pages)
Memo from Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson dated August 15, 2005 (2 pages)
Minutes from the June 21,2005 City Council Meeting (2 pages)
Site Plan dated 7/11/05 prepared by the Design Partnership (1 oversized page)
Landscape Plan dated 7/11/05 and prepared by the Design Partnership (1 oversized page)
Building Elevation Sheet dated 7/11/05 and prepared by The Design Partnership (1 oversized
page)
Grading Plan dated 7/29/05 and prepared by Paramount Engineering (1 oversized page)
Utility Plan dated 8/02/05 and prepared by Paramount Engineering (1 oversized page)
.
.
I SubjeCfProperty
I:
I:
)i
AL-H
01::8
3l:
m
OLSON MEMORIAL HWY
HIGHWAY 55
N MEMORIAL HWl)LSON MEMORIAL
HIGHWAY 55
HIGHWAY ~5 z
(</\~\(J (J i
. //. ~3:
/ '.' ~ m
//... /~~\ th
~# \ ~
/, \ 0
\ \/\ 0 \ ~
. / " 01 '-----"
/". \ :;10\. ~~____~"'\'
L~%\ ~b~~-~-"'JP()O:~~
\ /~ ~-----+-- RUR~ .... ..,_
HIGHWAY 55
z
z
lXl
c::
:;10
z
....
th
6
m
o
"
~
o
3l:
o
"
m
o
"
i
I,
i,
I.
I!
i
i
I
\/
f----
J II
.
.
'.
.
Memorandum
Public Works
763.593.80301763.593.3988 (fax)
alley
Date: August 16, 2005
To:
Mark Grimes, Director of Planning an
velopment
From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Subject: PUD 100, North Wirth Business
Public Works staff has reviewed the proposed plans for Planned Unit Development
(PUD) 100, North Wirth Business Park. This proposed PUD is located west Of Dahl berg
Drive and north of Trunk Highway 55. The proposed PUD consists of six multi-tenant
office condominiums.
Site Plan and Final Plat
The proposed site plan has been modified to address the comments contained in the
May 16, 2005 review by the Public Works Department. The layout of the proposed site
is acceptable as submitted.
The proposed buildings in the PUD are to be constructed in phases. The proposed
circulation patterns for the parking lots and driveways, and the locations of the proposed
utilities to serve the site, make phasing of site improvements difficult. Therefore,the
developer will be required to install the entire storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main
and parking Iotas the first phase of development.
The final plat for this PUD will be processed following approval of the final site plans.
The final plat must include easements consistent with City Code and the utility plan
dated August 2, 2005.
Utilitv Plan
Sanitary sewer and water are available within Dahlberg Drive to provide service to this
site. There is adequate capacity in these systems to meet the needs of the PUD. The
sanitary sewer mains and water mains within the PUD are to be owned and maintained
by the City following the completion of construction. These utilities must be designed
and constructed according.to City standards, including plan sheets, profile sheets and
record drawings, following construction. The developer will be required to construct
these utilities and will be responsible for all costs associated with the improvements,ln
addition, the developer will be responsible for all costs incurred by the City for
inspection of the utility work during construction.
G:\Developments-HRA\North Wirth Business Park\Corres\Final Review 0816QS.doc
.
.
.
T.he developer will be required to enter into a Public Improvement Agreement for the
construction of these utilities. The agreement will include requirements for securities to
be posted by the developer that are equal to 150% of the estimated construction cost
forthe pubic improvements.
The sanitary sewer and water services, from the. City-owned mains to the buildings, will
be owned and maintained by the developer following construction. It is City standard to
have individual water meters for each office space or residential unit. Based upon the
plans submitted. for review, it. is not clear if this requirement has been met. .. The Building
Official must review the final building plans to insure that individual meters are installed
after this service enters the common space of each building.
Gradina. Drainaae and Erosion Control
The proposed PUD<is located in the main stem sub-district of the Bassett Creek
Watershed. Therefore, the development will be subject to the review and comment of
the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission (BCWMC). The BCWMC's
Requirements fqr Improvements and Development Proposals outlines the water quality
requirements for development. Based upon this policy, the proposed development
would need to provide ponding on site for water quality and rate control. However, the
ponding requirements for this redevelopment project were provided by the City when it
constructed the pond at the intersection of Dahlberg Drive and Meadow Lane.
According to BCWMC policy, this development will be required to implement Best
Management Practices. (BMPS) for storm water runoff during the construction phase of
the project. These BMPs. must be clearly shown on the grading plan for the site.
The development is also subject to the City of GoldenValley's Grading, Drainage and
Erosion Control ordinance. Therefore the developer will need to obtain a Grading Permit
from the City prior to the start of work on site. Grading permits will be required for the
overall grading of the site and for each of the buildings when they are constructed.
The developer must submit a grading, drainage and erosion control plan that is
prepared in accordance with the City standards for such plans. The plans submitted do
notinclude the proposed storm sewer on the grading plan, and the locations of several
erosion control measures, including catch basin inlet protection, turf restoration, erosion
control maintenance. requirements and gravel construction entrances have not been
included on the plan. The grading permit for the site will not be issued until a plan
meeting the City standards is submitted and approved.
The proposed site grading shown on the grading plan that was submitted is acceptable
in concept.
The developer will be required to obtain a NPDES General Storm Water Permit from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) because the PUD site is in excess of one
acre. A copy of the permit application, and a copy of the permit once it has been
obtained, must be provided to the Public Works Department for its records.
G:\Developments-HRA\North Wirth Business Park\Corres\Final Review 081605.doc
.
The 27-inch diameter storm sewer. being extended across the southern edge of this site
will be owned and maintained by the City of Golden Valley following Construction. The
developer will be required to design and construct the storm sewer consistent with the
utility discussion contained earlier in this review. The costs for the storm sewer
construction must be included in the securities required as part of the Public
Improvement Agreement.
All other storm sewer on site, beginning at the point of connection to the existing City
storm sewer system, will be owned and maintained by the developer.
The developer must construct the driveway aprons to this site according to the City's
standards for commercial and industrial driveways.
This development is subject to the City's Right-of-Way Management Ordinance.
Therefore, the developer will be required to obtain permits for all excavation and
obstructions within the right-of-way for Dahlberg Drive. This permit requirement also
applies to any irrigation systems that may be installed following development.
Tree Preservation
This PUD is also subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. However, there are
no significant trees on site, so no tree preservation plan or permit is required.
.
Summary and Recommendations
Public Works staff recommends approval of PUD 100, North Wirth Business Center,
subject to the comments contained in this review, which.are summarized as follows:
1. The developer submits a final plat for review that includes eaSements consistent
with the Subdivision Ordinance and the comments contained in this review.
2. The final building plans must include separate water services and meters for
each of the condominium units.
3. The developer must enter into an Agreement for Public Improvements, including
design and construction of the sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer
systems as discussed in this review. The developer must also post securities. for
these improvements as discussed.
4. Subject to the review.and comments of the BCWMC.
5. The developer must submit a final grading, drainage and erosion control plan,
prepared to City standards, as part of the submittals for a grading permit.
6. Subject to the review and comments of other City staff.
C:
Tom Burt, City Manager
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator
Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator
Eric Eckman, Engineering Technician
Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire and Inspections
Gary Johnson, Building Official
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal
.
G:\Developments-HRA\North Wirth Business Park\Corres\Final Review 081605.doc
.
.
.
PU~Hc Jl~y
Memorandum
Fire Department
763-593-8055 I 763-512-2497 (fax)
To:
Mark Grimes, Director of Planning & Zoning
From:
Ed And~r$on,Deputy Fire Marshal
Subject: PUD.Final Design Plan for North Wirth Business Center located on Dahlberg Drive
Date: August 15, 2005
cc: Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire & Inspections
The Golden Valley Fire Department's Plan Review comments for the final design of the office condos
located in the North Wirth Business Center, Dahlberg Drive and Olson Memorial Highway.
1. The proposed fire line for the fire suppression system for each building shaU be a minimum of
6" with a post indicator valve connected to each fire line. The post indicator valve shall be
installed for each building and be monitored and supervised by a fire alarm control panel in
accordance withnationaflY recognized standards.
2. The fire hydrants proposed for this site shall be installed in accordance with the MN State Fire
Code and the City of Golden Valley's City Engineer's requirements.
3. The turning radius for the entire site and inCluding all driveways shall bea 45 ft. inSide turning
radius.
4. The no parking fire lane signs and stationary posts shall be installed in accordance with the
City of Golden Valley's City Ordinance and the Golden Valley Fire Department's installation
requirements.
5. Address numbers will be required to be mounted on the exterior wall for each tenant space.
The address numbers shall be legible and visible from the street or roadway.
6. The fire department apparatus access road shall be 26 feet wide with no obstructions of any
portion of the building more than 30 feet in height. If the building is less than 30 feet in height
the fire department access road shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide.
7. An approved access walkway leading from the fire apparatus road to all exterior openings will
be required. The.approved access walkway material shall be designed and maintained to
support the transportation of equipment and fire department personnel around the exterior of
the building.
.
.
.
8. The fire department access road surface shall be designed and maintained to support the
imposed load of the fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all weather driving
capabilities.
9. The fire department apparatus access road exceeding 150 feet shall provide a required turn-
around provision in accordance with the Minnesota State Fire Code.
10. Landscaping materials shall not obstruct in any matter or with any materialsinJrontor around
the. circumference of any fire hydrant. post indicator valve and/or the fire department
connection for the fire suppression system for each building.
11. The post indicator valves indicated on the site plan shall be a minimum 40 feet from the
proposed buildings or provide protectedbollards around the PIV in accordance with the
Minnesota State Fire Code.
If you have any questions please contact me at 763-593-8065.
\
.
.
.
Regular Meeting. of the City Council
June 21,2005
Page 3
*Approval of Reauests for Beer and/or Wine at Brookview Park
.~
MOVE, 0 by Freiberg, seconded bY['... rayson and mouon carried. loa. p. p. r.o. '!e.'. 111.. e. ie. guests for
be . ndlor wine at Brookview pan.?" recommended by staff. . '/ .... .'
Public "n - Ordinance #331i!'Final Plan A roval - PUD#91 - Amendment #1 -
Rud Luthe", ota
Jon Baker, Architect, and Don H
questions from the Council.
Don Ke.. ysserLfJa 'g Co
que~tiQtl&'fr5ffi the Cou . "
~ '
Mark Grimes, Direct of Planning an evelopment, prese
answered ques, from the Council. " .
The Mayor op ed the meeting for pu input and persons presen ~o so were
afforded the pportunity to express thei . iews thereon. Hearing and s~i no one, the
Mayor clo the public hearing.
Commission report and answered
'.
MOVE, by Shaffer,seconded by Pentel"~nd motion carried unanimously to ap"
Ord~ce #331, 2nd Series. Upon a roll call vote, the vote was as.follo. ws:
f)"'IBERG - YES GRAYSON - YES LOOMIS - YES PENTEL - YES SHAFFER - YES
Public Hearina - Preliminary Desian Plan Approval - PUD #100 - North Wirth
Business Center
Rick Martens and Darrell Anderson, applicants, reviewed the plan and answered questions
from the Council.
Don Keysser, Planning Commissioner, presented the Commission report and answered
questions from the Council.
Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development, presented the staff report and
answered questions from the Council. Allen Barnard answered questions from the Council.
\.
.
.
.
Regular Meeting oftheCity Council
June 21 ,2005
Page 4
Public Hearina . Preliminary Desian Plan Approval - PUD #100 - North Wirth
Business Center - Continued
The Mayor opened the meeting for public input and persons present to do so were
afforded the opportunity to express their views thereon. Hearing and seeing no one, the
Mayor clo~ed the public hearing.
MOVED by Shaffer, seconded. by Grayson and motion carried unanimously to approve the
Preliminary Design Plan for PUD #100, North Wirth Business Center subject to the
following conditions:
1. The following plans shall become a part of this approval: Site Plan dated November 4,
2004 prepared by the Design Partnership; Landscape Plan dated November 4, 2004
and prepared by the Design Partnership; Building Elevation Sheet dated November 11,
2004 and prepared by The Design Partnership; Grading Plan dated November 4, 2004
and prepared by Paramount Engineering; and Utility Plan dated November 4, 2004 and
prepared by Paramount Engineering.
2. The recommendations found in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, to Mark
Grimes dated May 16, 2005 shall become a part of these recommendations.
3. The recommendations found in the memo from Deputy Fire Marshal Ed Anderson to
Mark Grimes dated November 24, 2004 shall become a part of these
recommendations.
4. The plantings and sod indicated on the Landscape Plan shall be completed around
each building after construction of the building. Prior to construction of the buildings, all
areas shall be seeded with a seed mix acceptable to the City Engineer. The area that is
seeded shall be maintained in a manner as to not allow the growth to exceed 8 inches
in height.
5. The areas along Dahlberg Drive (between the parking lots and the street and east of
the southernmost building pad) shall have sod laid at the same time as the landscaping
is done around the first building.
6. The area north of the railroad tracks shall be placed in a conservation easement with
the City of Golden Valley. Development of the area north of the tracks may only occur
with an amendment to the PUD and amendment to the conservation easement.
ood
ny and Dave. , Landmark Development
the Council.
The Mayor opened the , ing for publi
afforded the opportu' to express their
..
.
alley
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
Date:
August 18, 2005
Golden Valley Planning Commission
To:
From:
Kristin A. Gonzalez, Planning Intern
Subject:
Informal Public Hearing on Subdivision of the Lot at 25 Lawn Terrace into Five
Lots -- Peter Knaeble, Applicant
One of the. unique features of this subdivision is that proposed Lot 1 will have street access
over a driveway .easement over Lots 2 & 3. This driveway easement eliminates the need for a
driveway onto Glenwood Avenue (County Road 66) near the ramp to southbound TH 100.
Hennepin County and MnDOT prefer access to lots off of local streets when possible. The
Subdivision Code only requires that a lot have full frontage on a public street. It does not
require that it have access to the street(s) with frontage.
Staff has heard from a couple of people who live in the neighborhood regarding this
Subdivision. The most common concern is that the subdivision of these lots is "out of
character" with the neighborhood. In the case of Lawn Terrace Estates, each of the proposed
lots exceeds the minimum size requirements for lots in the Residential zoning district. The
proposed lots are very similar in size to the lots along the west side of Lawn Terrace.
.
Staff has spoken to Mr. Knaeble about the development of the lots. The existing home on
proposed Lot 3 will remain. The other lots will be sold to builder(s) or developer(s) that have
yet to be selected. The homes to be built on these 4 lots will be "high end" homes consistent
or greater in value to the homes in the area.
.
.
Qualifications Governing Approval as a Subdivision
According to Section 12.12 of the City's Subdivision Regulations, the folloWing are the
regulations governing approval of subdivisions:
1. The Council may require such changes or revisions as it deems necessary for the health,
safety, general welfare and convenience of the City.
2. The approval of a preliminary plat is tentative only, involving merely the general
acceptability of the layout as submitted.
3. Prior to approval of the preliminary plat by the Council, approval by the City Engineer and
other public officials having jurisdiction will be required of the engineering proposals
pertaining to water supply, storm drainage, sewerage and sewage disposal, roadway
widths and the surfacing of streets.
4. No plat will be approved for subdivision which covers an area subject to periodic flooding
or which contains extremely poor drainage facilities and which would make adequate
drainage of the streets and lots difficult or impossible, unless the subdivider agrees to
make improvements which will, in the opinion of the City Engineer, make the area
completely safe for occupancy, and provide adequate street and lot drainage.
5. No plat will be approved forsubdivision that does not meet the requirements specified in
Section 12.20, Minimum Subdivision Design Standards, and Section 12.30, public. Sites
and Open Spaces.
The City Code requires that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the City
Council on this subdivision. The City Council would then hold a public hearing on the plan for
the subdivision. If the City Council approves the plan, the applicant will then prepare the final
plat. The final plat is then brought back to the City Council for approval.
Staff Findings
The staff has reviewed the request for the subdivision and found it to be acceptable. The
proposed subdivision would create five new lots for single family homes. These lots meet all
requirements for lots in the Residential zoning district. The developer has submitted all
information needed for review.
Recommended Action
The staff recommends approval of the proposed lot subdivision the folloWing conditions:
1. The recommendations of City Engineer Jeff Oliver as found in his memo dated August11 ,
2005 become a part of this approval.
2. Park dedication fees shall be paid at the time of final plat approval. The fee shall be
determined by the City Council.
3. The site plans submitted by the applicant, dated July 7,2005 shall become.a part of this
approval.
4. The site plans submitted by the applicant are subject to review and comment by MnDOT
and Hennepin County.
Attachments
. Location Map
Memorandum from Jeff Oliver PE to Mark Grimes dated August 11,2005 (3 pages)
Letter from James Grube, Hennepin County to Mark Grimes dated August 4,2005 (1 page)
Large Size Site Plans (9 pages)
2
'-
-
-'
- $415
2J.
S3l1
9 15 17
5
:l5
" -
UIl
- SOl
117 116
117
2111 -
20l
- -
-
315 au
-
-
-
327
400
-
.
City of Golden Valley
>, ~,
~~
"''''0
'~,
'" ~
-
\J\,AC:: DR .. "
-
~ '
\
i;.,.
\
,
"I'it-
~ ,
'''; 'J.
~i>, ~<>,
,
'" -,,~.~,- '" - ,.- - ,-
<to
-
112
-
115
-
zzo :au
:no
~1.25 Lawn Terrace I
~, ,v" ~.r"
,,~
~.... '
Ii"",~" ~
',," '
'\
"'...,
0\",
\,
5211
520l 5W
51>>
ID
PID:3002924220003
25 LAWN TER
GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55416
Legend
~ lofightighl9d FlIlalunl
HtMe NIl.....'"
f $_l~.
/tI' cay UmII
. Ope.. WalBt
P SlIuma
. ,Pa_
D PatCUls
.
.
.
"
Memorandum
Public Works
763.593.8030 I 763.593.3988 (fax)
alley
Date: August 11, 2005
To: Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer ~W
Subject: Review at Lawn Terrace Estates
Public Works staff has reviewed the proposed Lawn Terrace Estates subdivision. The
proposed development consists ot subdividing one large lot with a single home on it into five
new lots, including one that will contain the existing home. The proposed subdivision is
located in the southeast corner ot Lawn Terrace and Glenwood Avenue, immediately west
ot Trunk Highway 100.
The comments contained in this review are based upon the plans submitted to the City on
August 5, 2005.
Preliminary Plat and Site Plan
The drainage and utility easements shown on the proposed preliminary plat .are consistent
with City Code.
The existing right-ot-way tor Lawn Terrace is 32 teet wide adjacent to this cjevelopment. The
right-ot-way widens to 60 teet, as required by City Code, at the intersection .0fColonial Drive
and Lawn Terrace. The developer will be required to dedicate an additional 14 teetot street
right-ot-way tor Lawn Terrace with this subdivision. This right-ot-way dedication is shown on
the preliminary plat.
All five lots within this subdivision will have driveway access onto Lawn Terrace. Access to
Lots 1 and 3 will be via a shared driveway. The developer will be required to prepare a
driveway easement tor Lots 1, 2 and 3 in order to assure that access to Lot 1 is maintained.
A copy ot this executed agreement must be submitted to the City as part at the final plat
suomittal.
The street system adjacent to this proposed development has adequate capacity to
accommodate the traffic generated by the subdivision.
Utilities
There is adequate capacity in the sanitary sewer and water systems adjacent to this site to
accommodate this development.
G:\Developments-Private\Lawn Terrace Estates\Review 0811 OS.doc
, t
..
There is one existing sanitary sewer and water service for the existing home. New services
will be required for the four proposed homes. The developer will be required to obtain the
appropriate utility and. right-of-way permits for the installation of these services.
The proposed sewer service for Lot 2 is into the sanitary sewer main in Glenwood Avenue.
The developer must relocate this sewer service to Lawn Terrace, if possible, in order to
avoid excavation of Glenwood Avenue. If the service must be into Glenwood Avenue, the
developer will be required to obtain the appropriate permits from Hennepin County and/or
the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT).
Gradina. Drainaaeand Erosion Control
This proposed development is within the Sweeney Lake sub-district of the Bassett Creek
Watershed. Therefore, the plans must comply with the Bassett Creek Water Management
Commission's (BCWMC) Requirements for Improvements and Development Proposals.
Based upon the size of the proposed development, the developer is required to implement
B~st Management Practices (BMPs) for storm water management.
The developer is proposing the installation of "rain gardens" for each of the new homes in
order to meet the BCWMC's requirements for BMPs. Rain gardens are landscaped basins
that gather storm water runoff and allow it to infiltrate into the ground. This infiltration
minimizes the amount of nutrients and sediment that is discharged into water bodies with
the storm water runoff. The rain gardens also have an overflow to accommodate heavy
rainfalls that exceed the. infiltration capacity of the basin.
. The.proposed rain garden design has been reviewed by Sherri Buss, a landscape architect
with Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, who specializes in rain garden design.
Based upon the Bonestroo review, it appears that the proposed rain gardens will have
nutrient removal consistent with the BCWMC requirements;
The lots within this development will be custom graded at the time each home is
constructed. The final grading for each lot will require a City of Golden Valley Grading,
Drainage and Erosion Control Permit. The grading plans required at the time of permit
application will address the grading of each lot, including final design of the rain gardens.
The final plans must demonstrate that there will be no adverse storm water runoff patterns
created .on adjacent properties.
The developer will be required to enter into a Storm Water Facility Maintenance Agreement
for each of the proposed rain gardens. The maintenance agreement must be based upon
the specific planting proposed for each rain garden. Therefore, the maintenance .
agreements will be required prior to issuance of a grading permit for each home.
The proposed plans are subject to the review and comments of the BCWMC. No work can
begin on site prior to approval from the commission.
.
As discussed above, each rain garden basin has an emergency overflow swale to
accommodate runoff from heavy storms. The overflows from each basin are located to
discharge consistent with the runoff patterns that currently exist on site. The existing runoff
currently flows to Glenwood Avenue, Lawn Terrace or towards the eastern edge of the site.
All runoff eventually flows into the MnDOT storm water management pond located to the
southeast of the site adjacent to the ramp onto TH 100.
G:\Developments-Private\Lawn Terrace Estates\Review 0811 OS.doc
. 4)
5)
6)
.
.
.....-. . .
Tree Preservation
This proposed development is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. A
preliminary Tree Preservation. Plan has been submitted that indicates that no tree mitigation
will be required. An individual Tree Preservation Permit will be required at the time each
home is constructed.
Conclusions and Recommendation
Public Works staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat of Lawn Terrace Estates
based upon the comments contained in this review, which are summarized as follows:
1) The developer must submit a driveway easement covering Lots t, 2 and 3when the
final plat is submitted. This easement must be signed and ready for recording
following approval of the final plat.
2) The developer must obtain a Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control permit for the
construction of each home. The plans for these permits must include the final design
of the rain gardens.
3) The developer must enter into a Storm Water Facility Maintenance Agreement for
each of the proposed rain gardens. This agreement must be fully executed prior to
issuance of a grading permit for the site.
The developer must obtain Tree Preservation Permits for each lot at the time of
home construction.
Subject to the review and comments of the Bassett Creek Water Management
Commission.
Subject to the review and comments of other City staff.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
C: Tom Burt, City Manager
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator
Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator
Eric Eckman, Engineering Technician
Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire and Inspections
Gary Johnson, Building Official
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal
G:\Developments-Private\Lawn Terrace Estates\Review 0811 OS.doc
.
Hennepin County Transportation Department
1600 Prairie Drive
Medina,MN 55340-5421
763-745-7500, Phone
763-478-4000, FAX
763-478"4030, TOO
www.co.hennepin.mn.us
August 4, 2005
Mark Grimes
Planning Department
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
GoldenValley, MN 55427
Re: Preliminary Plat - Lawn Terrace Estates
CSAH 40, Southeast Quadrant Lawn Terrace
Section 30, Township 29, Range 24
Hennepin County Plat No. 2922
Review and Recommendations
Dear Mr. Grimes:
.
Minnesota Statutes 505.02,505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of
preliminary plats abutting county roads. The Plat Review Committee reviewed the above plat at its regular
meeting on August 2,2005. The following comments are provided for your consideration.
. Hennepin County Transportation finds the plat acceptable as submitted.
. Please inform the developer that all proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved
Hennepin County permit prior to. beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, driveway and
street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Appropriate forms can
be obtained by contacting our Permits Section at 763-745-7601.
Please direct any response to Dave Zetterstrom at 763-745-7643.
Sincerely,
~Y7~
James N. Grube, P.E.
Director of Transportation
and County Engineer
JNG:DKZ:dw
cc: Plat Review Committee ~ Byers / Drager / Holtz / Johnson / Lemke / Lindgren / Wiebe / Zetterstrom
RobWied, Hennepin County Surveyor's Office
.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Recycled Paper
Terra
Engineering, Inc.
...
.Nil Engineering
annlng. Consulting
.
.
August 9,2005
Re: Neighborhood Meeting
Preliminary Plat Application for 25 Lawn Terrace
Lawn Terrace Estates (5 Lot Single Family Project)
Dear Neighbors:
We have scheduled a Neighborhood Meeting for our Lawn Terrace Estates project
for Thursday, August 18th at Brookview Community Center at 7:00 pm. We are
proposing a single family development that saves the existing home at 25 Lawn
Terrace and plats four additional single family lots that exceed all of the City zoning
standards.
We welcome you to this Neighborhood Meeting to answer your questions or
concerns. If you have any questions, you can also call me at 763-593-9325..
Sincerely,
p~, /), )(,,~4 ~
Peter J. Knaeble
TERRA ENGINEERING, INC.
CC: Cotty Lowry
Mark Grimes, City of Golden Valley
6001 Glenwood Avenue. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 . 763 593 9325 . Fax: 763 512 0717
"
-
-
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR:
LAWN TERRACE ESTATES
GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
7/20/05
F~ -~-- /~T~---~ -..' '. . '.
I -'--~~----~-"--'//':;' ',. " ,~~,~ '.'
! / .)~"
, .' - I '~-~'-----"""'-------J
~ ," r. . 1.. '"
,i'. :I ~... ~:...{~~;:t..~" ~ 1\ .
.. . < A " ~ "/ Jf '" \\.
,~,"""~--'-'j;C"-"-.. "',/ " 'iT7"--~/~ .:,' L~--j' / ." ">\
~'1 ./ ""... of.., "/ ,~j" ~~-"''''''I
'/ j" j i J~'~; ir- .r, ~~_>,
;-:4 ....... .~;H" "J;; P r.,)' .. " , ... .> " I
i', ..;;~~ ~<~--~~ ~.,~'EN"".',."wo~o' ,4,.,.. ...." ';" j" <. ~,' ,,' ,;~'*";. ".1,/ '/11
., -- .::,,\ J,.,:,/D n, .", ""
il-:' 4' - .,., vt:. """j...., '/
~~ .t~~. - -~::~:~ ~~:~~~.~
'-'" -,' -". ,,'\.]
, "-', I >.;
. ~-' \\
\1
\
/
.
.
.
.,'
-,
I
I
I
I
~
b:Js
40
SHAW
104
MCCLEES
ROOD
HAAPAUA
112
FINK
200
PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR:
LAWN TERRACE ESTATES
GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
~ ~O\ ~
~
GLENWOOD A lIE.
~~
R ::: 1248.19
16116 114
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
ICD
I~
lin
II")
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
161161114
o
I")
...
r.: - 35' FSe
- -
CDi 0 -
Cfl 1-' -
I.&.. w::>co -,
000;) ICD
-~ 2
nIOCfl...J II I~ 10
oi" <I- 18,979 SF
0;) IX) 3: ::t Ol
0;) ~ lin
I")
15 SSB ____...I
o
IX)
10
r...:
ex:>
o
I- .
w::> IX)
000;)
-~o;)
OCflO.E- 0
tDing ~
Ol Cfl
IX) CD
12.5' SSB
12.5' SSB
10
r...:
IX)
CD I-
Cfl ::>
I.&.. 0
in :J
I") 0 ~
00 "
~ IX)
o
o
~ ~
II 0
I- Ol
~ IX)
Cfl
CD
----I
5 \~
15,543 SF \~
OJ
\
----~
12.5' SSB
I
I
I
I
I
CD1
~l
inl
1")1
197.41
S 89'09'31" W
115
BAUER
44
ANDERSEN
28
LDC.t.1ION MAP
NO SCALE
SHEELINDEX
SHEET
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
PRELIMINARY PLAT
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
PRELIMINARY RAIN GARDEN DESIGN / DETAILS
PRELIMINARY NOTES. DETAILS & SWPPP
\ F'a:'N0:
~ B-5 DENOTES SOIL BORING
- - - - - - - DENOTES SILT FENCE/GRADING UlAlT
- -1;)S~- - DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS
-1056- DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS
->_=-- DENOTES STORM SEl\ER
., > DENOTES SANITARY SEl\ER
_' W DENOTES WATERMAlN
, '"",,,23 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
X 1056.0 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ECF.'058.0 DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERF'LOW ELEVATION
N
w
E
s
30
30
o
L::::......
SCALE
IN
WARNING
THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SH~ IN AN APPROXIMATE
WAY ONLY. THE EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE 1HE EXACT LOCATION OF
ALL EXISTING UTlUTlES BEfORE COMMENCING WORK. 1HE CON'lRACTOR AGREES TO BE
fULLy RESPONSIBLE fOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHIClj MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS
fAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTlUTlES.
....
....
....
.. 0
.. ..
. ....
III III
III C')
.. .. 10
::>> '0 ,....
c: en ..
! ~ ~
g~~
l ~ ~
.!! 8. C')
<lI .. '"
.... .. It>
8 ~ III
10 ~ ....
.
iilll
1ICSJQG P..JJC./1CRP.
MAW HU'.
CHCQtD P.,g
t
} ..
.d
z
:5
a.
~
in
>-
~
<
z
:i
:J
LaJ
~
a.
~
o
(/HI)
~LaJ
<Z
I-~
(/):i
LaJ
~
~~
~~
I:!:!z
i9
:58
;
DAre
7/7/05
80 .PRO.JD:T NO.
FEET
05-116
SHeeT NO.
1
-....-.-
'- '. - "-"" -.;"" ~
'\ \...........:= .:::::-""""\...,,,,~
........:::: - "''' """ '-" ,-""
.-=-" "" ,'" '" '" '- " " "
'\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
........
?'
~
XI
-:.~
//1 ,~.4
/' ~
,/ ~
"
l'
\
---fIll
/ /"-//1
I ( r ( \
! \ \ \ \
\ \\ \
\ \ \
'\ \
\ '\
'\
\...
"
)
,/
/'
/
,-
40 ~ \
SHAW I
I \
-- "- &$)
~- '\ ~
104
-'
--
'\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
1-
~
---.---..........
--~ )
../
FINK
200
I
/
(
\
\
\
\
I
\
"..... ---.
./
I
I
\ ~ 208 r)
\
\
\
1iGem:
~ B-5 DENOlES SOIL BORING
_ - - - - - - DENOlES SILT FENCE/GRADING UMIT
- -1056- - DENOlES EXISTING CONTOURS
-I05&- DENOlES PROPOSED CONTOURS
->>->>- DENOlES StORM SEWER
->->- DENOlES SANITARY SEWER
-S'!.-..--_ DENOTES WA TERMAIN
, '050.2> DENOlES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
X '_.0 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
EQF.1058.0 DENOTES EWERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION
N
w
s
30
o
30
E
I"-
...
l"-
N 0
~ ~
:g It)
!l ~ ~
C en ..
! ~ !
... :i It)
Sl .....
~ == ~
.!! 8. ..,
ClJ .. 0>
... ~ It)
8 - m
'" ~ I"-
.
Jilll
I1CS1fIG
_loW
CIG:KD
.
~
Z 0
:5 u)u)
Q. ~~
U) ~Z
Z U)2
~ LLI ~.
Q ~
Z <
o a::
o 0::>
~ ~Z
F= ~LLI
U) ~9
~ :58
;
DllTe
7/7/05
I
GO
,
-.Ef:T NO.
05-116
.--
SCALE IN FEET
WARNING I r NO.
THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOVltl IN AN APPROXlMAlE SI/CC
WAY ONLY. THE EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR SHALL DElERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF
ALL EXISTING UTlUTlES BEfORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE
fULLY RESPONSIBLE fOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS
fAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCAlE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTlUllE5.
2
1611
14
r--
~ ----
~ -----
~I ------
'-1 ----
wi ---.......... ,....,
~I -~
~I ~i
::>1 '"":'1
~I ~I
01 <I
bl 2 lJJ~
NI ::>
.-: 18,979 SF :g .
I . I
1 C!I
CO.J
L____________--------------
o
I")
4
o
eX>
If)
,...:
eX>
10
,...:
eX>
r----------------------
1 ----/~
I (
I \
1 5 \
1 \
I \
I 15,543 SF \
I \
I \
I \
I \
L_________~~_~~~~~~~i~y~J____1
161161114
o
44
SITE INFORMATION
EXISllNG ZONING.. R-l (SlNGl.E F'AMILY)
PROPOSED ZONING.. R-l (SINGtE F'AIoIILY) NO CHANGE
TOTAL SITE AREA (PER ADVANCE SURVE\1NG, 7/16/99) 2.27 ACRES.
TOTAL SITE AREA MINUS AREA OF' EXlSllNG HOME SITE .. 1.55 ACRES
1. R-1 ... STANDARDS
MIN. LOT AREA .. 10,000 SF'
MIN. LOT WIDTH .. 60' (0 F'RONT SElBACK UNE)
MIN. LOT WIDTH (CORNER LOT) .. 100' (0 F'RONT SElBACK UNE)
MIN. LOT DEPTH .. N/A
F'RONT SElBACK .. ;3&'
REAR SElBAC1< .. 20X OF' LOT DEPTH
SlOE SElBACK .. 12.5' (15' F'OR LOTS> 100' IN WIDTH)
2. II1E DATA
TOTAL PROPOSED SITE AREA
NUMBER OF' LOTS
SITE DENSITY
MINIMUM LOT SIZE
AVERAGE LOT SIZE
2.14 ACRES
5
2.34 UNITS PER ACRE
12.644 SF'
18,670 SF'
3. II1E NOlES
TYPICAL PAD .. 60' WIDE X 50' DEEP
TYPICAL FRONT DRAINAGE& U11UTY EASMEMENT .. 12'
TYPICAL REAR DRAlNAGE& UllUTY EASMEMENT .. 12'
TYPICAL SlOE DRAlNAGE& U11UTY EASMEMENT .. 6'
(SEE PRELMNARY PLAT F'OR LOCAllON OF OTHER
DRAINAGE AND U11UTY EASEMENTS)
RIGHT-OF'-WAY UNE
LOT UNE
GARAGE FRONT ELEVA liON
(GARAGE LOCATED ON LOT HIGH SIDE)
PAD TYPE
TYPICAL 60' WIDE X 50' DEEP PAD
BASEMENT ELEVAllON
GROUND ELEVAllON AT REAR
BUILDING SElBACK UNE
T'tP.1.OI
DRAINAGE & U11UTY EASEMENTS (TYP.)
(12' FRONT, REAR TYP" 6' SlOE TYP.)
InsNO!
~ B-5 DENOTES SOIL BORING
_ _ _ _ _ _ - DENOTES SILT F'ENCE/CRADING Ut.lIT
- -1056- - DENOTES EXISllNG CONTOURS
-1058- DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS
_>>->>- DENOTES STORt.I SE\\ER
-: > DENOTES SANITARY SE\\ER
--a' '11--- DENOTES WA TERt.lAIN
, ....... DENOTES EXISllNG SPOT ELEVAllON
X 1056.0 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVA110N
EOF"1059.0 DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERF'LOW ELEVAllON
N
W --- __E
s
30
o
30
SCALE
IN
WARNING
THE LOCAllONS OF' EXISllNG UNDERGROUND UllLITIES ARE SHO~ IN AN APPROXlt.lA TE
WAY ONLY. THE EXCAVAllNG CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCAllON OF
ALL EXlSllNG U11UllES BEF'ORE COt.IMENCtNG WORK. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE
F'ULLY RESPONSIBLE F'OR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH t.lIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS
F' AlLURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UllUllES.
iilll
IJUIG>D
IltAIoti
CHCCI<D
~lsl :ll
tjl~
~l!j
-.U~1
Shi 1'5
Ifill
...
...
...
C'oI C)
C'oI C'oI
... ...
.., ..,
.., ..,
I B ...
o ...
en ..
! ~ of
"S! :i ..,
15 . C'oI
I: .!!! Sl
~8...,
Cll .. '"
... ! ..,
8 .5 m
... == ...
.
PJ,II./NRP.
HIIJ'.
I'.J./G
~
.
~
o
en en
,~~
~~
en2
La.I
I~~
82~
~Z
~9
:58
i
/lATe
7/7/05
60
.,
-.xt:T NO.
F'EET
SHCCT NO.
t-
:3
D..
>-
n:
<
z
~
~
La.I
n:
a..
05-116
.
3
I
I
I
l
"
/
/
/
/
/
/'
/'
",'
./
'-
\
\
\ (
t )
\__/
(01
~
/
",-j. A- -
/' ....:cJ' -- -....
/ "
,
./
/'
'- -.
"
\
\
"
\
\
\
\
\
\
s
&..90
\
- -..
\
\
. \
I
I I
~ \
"- <90
" ~
\
"- \
\ \
\
\ \\1"
\
~
t
L
\..
"- '~ · ror J
" \ 1 I
"
", Iii
~ \ \
\ \ \
\ \
A I % 11"-1-
I
q>
~ \ ~
! I
/ /
( I
- -.
v ~l?_../ 0
JtGJ~ . ~ -0 \"?) oC$
() ..J '" 00 g\
I Ze>> ./ '\ 0 d
w Z / l' 1><
' ll.. 0 / go -'.....~
II-<{I 5 1'],.00 I ) c
~ cr: 1'),.' '?J'J;
~ - Ico0 . ,Q I ,/ "
" I :1 0 / VY-.. \
~ :J I ~ I I RAI~ 1 \.. <>t\ I ( ( / .........
''5 ~t~ CO 1 ~~ GA~E~-) I \ I '"^" '"
I ',-,
,~ I O~ 1 b . 1" I \ I ........,~ ,~
\
~ ro 0 1 \ 1" oO.b \ I \ \
\
\co 791 \ 887.4 970_ I I I
01 l-. " ....--
"
,/
SIll: 1N~A.1l0N:
TOTAL SITE AREA - 2.14 ACRES
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA - 0.95 ACRES
TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA - 0.41 ACRES
NO~
1. SILT FENCE BY BUILDERS
2. RAIN GARDEN BY BUILDERS (SEE DETAIL SHEET)
3. SEE DETAil SHEET FOR GENERAL GRADING NOTES
AND S~PP.
4. WOOD FlBER BLANKET SHALL BE PLACED ON All
SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER (SEE DETAIL).
5. INSTALl TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
AT EACH DRIVEWAY BY BUILDER (SEE DETAIL).
6. All PADS TO BE CUSTOM GRADED BY BUILDER.
7. SEE RAIN GARDEN DETAIL SHEET FOR RAIN GARDEN
DESIGN.
B94CHUARIC:
TOP NUT HYDRANT. SOUTHEAST CORNER Of
GlENWOOD AVE. & LAWN TERRACE.
ELEVAll0N-BB1.92
U:GEND:
~ B-~ DENOlES SOIL BORING
_______ DENOlES SILT FENCE/GRADING UMIT
-. -1056- - DENOlES EXlSnNG CONTOURS
-10M- OENOlES PROPOSED CONTOURS
_>>->>- DENOTES STORM SEWER
->->- DENOlES SANITARY SEWER
-e:--lN- OENOlES WATERNAlN
Xl056.23 DENOlES EXISTING SPOT ELEVAnQN
X 1056.0 DENOlES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVAnON
EQf'.105l1.0 DENOlES ENERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVAnON
N
w
s
20
20
o
SCALE
IN
WARNING
THE LOCAnONS Of EXISnNG UNDERGROUND UnUnES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXlNAlE
WAY ONLY. lliE EXCAVAnNG CONTRACTOR SHALL DElERMINE lliE EXACT LOCAnON Of
AU EXlSnNG ununEs BEFORE CQNNENClNG WORK. lliE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE
FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DANAGES WHICH NIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS
FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCAlE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND ununES.
....
...
....
C'lo
C'l C'l
... ...
.... ....
.. s ~
" 0 ....
e CI) ..
! ~ .!!
g :i ....
iI= ,; l:l
c::: ::: 0)
.!! &. ..,
<ll .. '"
... .. ....
8 ~ ~
'" ::Ii ....
.
iilll
IICS1IINCJI p..JJ<./NRJI.
MA.... tcV.
CI/CO(D P.JJG
~lsl ~
till>
~i:lj
.U~I
Itgll>
nil!
.
E
~
a..
C)
z
~
~
>-
a::
<I(
ii
:E
::J
LaJ
a::
a..
~
o
.~~
~ii
(I):E
'I.IJ
>=
~~
fi~
~z
i9
:58
;
DAre
7/7/05
40 .f'I/OJCCT NO.
1
.
FEET
05-116
$HCCT NO.
4
~
~S
104
MCCLEES
.....
("
\
5 \
\
\
\
r<?
\
\
&U EASE.llYfJ____j
200
115
BAUER
208
u
RELOCA TE EXISTING
POWERLlNE (INSTALL
UNDERGROUND)
.~
ANDERSEN
28
L~~
~ B-~ DENOlES SOIL BORING
_.. .... .. .. - DENOtES SlL T fENCE/GRADING UlMT
- -1056- - DENOtES EXlS11NC CONTOURS
-1056- DENOlES PROPOSED CONTOURS
_>_>- DENOlES STORM SEVER
_: ~ DENOlES SANITARY SEWER
--eo u; DENOlES WAlERMAlN
I '''''''.23 DENOlES EXlSTlNC SPOT ElEVATION
X l~o.o DENOlES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVAllON
BlF.1058.0 DENOtES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ElEVAllON
TOP ElEVAll0N
END OF SERlllCE
INVERT ELEVAllON (AT
EASEMENT UNE)
UT1LnY NOTES:
1. ALL SANITARY SERlllCE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SOR26
2. WAlER SER\IICES SHALL BE 1.0" TYPE K COPPER (LOT 1 - 1.!l" SERIIICE (VERIfY))
N
w
E
s
30
o
30
I"-
~
I"-
... 0
... ...
... ~
It) It)
It) C'l
.. .l!l to
.. .. l"-
e CI) ..
~ ~ .f
... i It)
II ....
i .!! Sl
!8.C'l
ell to 0>
.... l!! It)
8 c: C'l
- to
to ::E I"-
.
Jilll
lJC$J1H31
/lIfA~
CHCOCU
.
~
o
(/)(/)
.~~
~~
(/)::i
I.IJ
I~~
~~
mZ
i9
~8
;
DATe
7/7/05
~
Q.
~
::J
F
::::>
>-
Q:
4(
Z
:i
::J
lIJ
~
Q.
60
I'IlD./CCr lID.
05-116
.
,---
SCALE IN
WARNING Is_r lID.
THE LOCAllONS OF EXIS11NG UNDERGROUND UllLI11ES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXlMAlE
WAY ONLY. THE EXCAVAllNG CONTRACTOR SHALL DElERMlNE THE EXACT LOCAllON OF
ALL EXlSllNG UllUllES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE
F"ULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS
F AlLURE TO EXACTLY LOCAlE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTlUTlES.
F"EET
5
\ I
I I
\ I
\ I
/ t ~ ~ I) (
o ^
/ I
-..____/ /}{ ( \---1
--...... "-"------~/I \
---~ I
006 - - '.J \ -- - ./
..---
----............
ru
o
CD
I
i \
l \
\ l
\
\.
I
I
\
I
J r
I I I
I/l-
II
I
I
I
I
--
I r-
I (
I I
j '\. ----
,
\
\
'-.
\
\
\
\
\0
1 I..j::>.
)>0
~
/--
/
/
/
./
6B --
r.-Jv
...I
....... I;;o
....... )>0
,-." )>0
I V-oO
)>
)>
~
()
()
r
I"'l
I"'l
/ r ~- ~__I
/ /
"\ P.O,..
Q",
/6' A~ ~o~.l I........ ,,<1''' "
\~ ~ / /.. 96'" I ~ \'lb~-,<>. ....P.'\~ '\ -.... ~:CJ "~ '1 W?;
/ 6!fs.." 'b.0./ " I (~O", '\ \, I I I \aJ~~ <P.
/ ..-- / 'lOb ~~ 7~ ("- \ I ,\ I '\ 'bo>. "I ( ~J I ....d -~ ~. "b
0'. _ "'. '<)' \....."'0 ~ ~ ,,~ 0... ... <:)
_ __ -i: ~ ~" \:n. ~ l~o d"f( I \ " \ {, ~.~1q toll" /
g!....... -/- (' ,,\. "'~O,;P" 0~'b.0 ,"r.." '\.1, I) / \. W'b~,,%\<1" ~
~ Ui ( / r - - " '-, " \. \.0', \ \~: ~ O!, ~ \ ~ /' " \~" ~ "( "~\ ""~:\
;;0 , " \. " ,-~ <&~ 0"'- "I ....,
\ O~."" ," 4, ~ -- \ I \ I,q
\ .. .... ~..,O'..ll() " \ \. \ (' ~ '4" " 'd, I clI.~ I
( / I ) \ II ~ - - -siL1rfEN~' \. \ as /~O ::- ...-"'~'O \ I ~ l....bnlJ
/ ! I \ I ~ -01;- -G~ADIPl!G'LTMtr\.'.:- \ q> -;' io V \1'" \...6 ~ ~1''#'_~ /
I (' 'b "" "' .J,.. ,..I.. +" (' I ' '\ \ ~ ~ p r ~ , ~>
I I I I I I / ~ " \ / \ \.,.. '1' ~) }t<! c:: /
It / ~ I ( ~ 0'. \ co J1 J I \. I %'\--j1..I~ ~~
'. r;' if? I / \ ~~. ..)~~ p:\ <p. ~ Cl I , "I \ 1 co I f<1. J5t' {
! I j I I {\ ~....A1~ -t,.,3?0 <b0l~ I ls-~o '&~o t 1 t I I ~ /' ~oJ~ /~/
l1J I {\ o>:X v"'..... "':R I \~. '\ I .:\ L ., 'r51~
I, I ~;' / ./ / / \ 0 J;. ~. ~ ....p~ ~~CfrcP~1 \ ~ \ \ J ,\)' rOo I I I I .' ~......
, J I / I * ~ """f~ ~ 'I' '1',-... ~ <P~ \ ~ .d I { I I / ClJ ~
'\ _ / ~v { .9. ~ "So", ~ ~ d? {""_I\> - 'f.O \. I.... -) I ,. I / I i I "
1// / ,g'l' Q<P.~" ~ --- \ ft./I I
,/ I / / ././ / \. ~". d'. "'. 1- 0lb1. \ -, -..: - ------ ~.; I I I / df.
_ / I . ./ "\, -v. ~' - ~ 0"\ I <1'. I / I
.....- ../ I I \..,.~........ ~ <, fI'- _ ',.'U- "'",.0 ~9 I II 1'~1 J 1 L I
/ .,.. , '. 0'" -.... "1:>0 L _ - / ' I I AP_ j I
- __ / / '----,'" __<-:~~ -~ ,,~;,'"T<i ./ / ./ I I /Qp:~
-- __ ./ __ - - - -.... \. \. \ <' \. - ___ __ !' "'....;0>\/ ~ /' ./ 4~1 I I I IQ{
-....... ~ - '" \ ~ - - ---" /-Jt7 ./ /' ./ ~~ I Ib I I 1('
" .....- / -- - - ~" ' " \ \ r- -,,:'- '-~-.ll'\.. ,- -<1'; - (t' __ / /' ./ /' 7<-< {,.rol
__ _ _ _ ~ / _ _ __ '- \. \. \\ \ " ,,), ~ ~.l1 '" - ~.....- ./ /' ./ _~ 10 I I
.....- /' ......., \. \ "'\" "d"'Q -",,&.01. /....":.> /'./ ./ xr y y.
./ / "" I \ \ I' -; '-. ~ ........ 1- q.t - "'. <Y r ./ /.' J. /' I I
, ./ ./ \ \! \ . \ \ < ': _~: __ :- :.,- ~ ~./ /~./ /' / ./ ,.~~ -=;r.~/ I I "0'.>
/1 (/ ; / 1\\ 1\\ I"", ':-~~~~~i~./ //~..Q/;~/' ~~/ 6'~)
./ J )?pfO, / RJ / J / \ ! ! I " '" <-:.. --- -=\- / t~ /<?".;:-- ~/// /
/ ( ..-" AI(, /.0; / / I ,/ ", - -",X -."".....- \
, A>/ -;.o~ q;' / 'b -. - ~-'-J_:./ / .-P
~ I / ././ ,PS,/,fO/ I r~ --:--~ o~c;~// ~y/ \. I
/ r Ul )> . / / / ' '/ / / co ./~. --...... J """"'" -- _ ,_ "'1<-- ~ "'~6l ~ ,?)'9 0 ~
/ 0....... Z / / ././ ./ / \1 a--- _ - o~. ~ \
/ is 0\ 0 / I /./ / ":/ /' ./ co / ><('-' __ '- ..., / - - - _~ / /' ~ 0. -r-
]>0 Sri //////,I,.,.~/./~~:__/:,---_:"___",,,j ,.- <?".,., I J
I I ~ / / / / / ,'/ ..-::.. ./ / /' .....- gQ, -'- ............. - -- / ~ \ /
. z/ / // ' ./,. /.../ / ...- <;!, -- ---......... - - - - ~ I
/ ,I / //,'///..-/_ ,,\...<6 -/: -- #--.,........ __....... -,./ ~ \ /
/,.// ".' , ,/ V / '" '- ____ , - /
, ./ '// ~.. '/- '/ ,- // ,..- .....--- /' ~ / "........ "- '- - ) /
/ /,..... '- / //1/ ;;/: -:; ~ ;' ~::.. ;::. ,.: :::: ::..- ;'; :: ; / ;-- ....... \ " ~ "'\" '- ,\ / I /
/' / \1/11 /.///, ~/""/ ..-- /' /' -- " -- \ \ ./ /
, .. / / / '/ '/ .' " / / ' r ./ " <9. \ '\ ./
1/./ ,..- - - /~ /// //;'! / /1; ~ /' -::- ' / / /~. // ~- ---. .... "0,, ""\ OJ \ \ ../ ./ 7
,I 1I11 ~///./ ///'l~///'!II//~;;~/r.~/ ,,",2'-\ \%\ I /.// ",,/ /'
- /i / ~/ / - / II " /.,..- --- ...... \ ~ \ ~ /'
I I I _ li~ focoz///~' ~//;j~// / /S~~\ k)$\ Ii / ,cf' .---,l<7 '/
,I I / ) / /1/ C5, ~ ~,./..;., ././ / I x /.---./ )-1/ ~ / ) ) I I II,; / /" '/
! I // /1//III';:/7A~/:";' /~.// /~./ // ,,.( II/I II II 1// / "/
/ / /I///! ~I/ 11/1/;,;;:-/ -: ~~/ / -,-' .. / / /~ // I /I~/ // / 1// /
/ / I II /' /j 1/ I I ! / Ii { 1// / / />;/ /' ./ / /: / I ~I 1// / II / I /
1//'1/1//1/1//1/11//..'/ /' /'< / ,.,.<./ /.//1/ //.: 11/ I
,/,11./(;1/1111////1/11 / / /./ &'/.'111// /1 /
;' if /Uil//:/i/ "11/ /,'/ .< /' 0',////1/// I I I - /
/ ! 1 ! II , II ' ( /I! / II/Ii I,' I' _./ / <' - --< \, / / y' /, 1/';, / / / / /
r-
---
--
,/
../'
/r:#Jg---
\
\
\
/
\
--
"-
"-
I
1
.\.
I
---&%
')
/
---,..,-,...,...,....---...........-........
~FF=~~I
~:::.-
",,,,~~g
d~~:<~
",O()3!~
~~c"''''
fl~Sg~
...("Yt"'>'"
2~:;~~
):>t:l~~
rlz~()()
>; g2
Zzozo
OO~,",!il
~>;r::>~
~~~~~
ilI~~"'o
,..~xc tn ~
~~l~ S
d~~::l
02",,,,~
~;r::o~'"
I--~~!l!
~~,",3!0
O~~I"1~ z
!il ...."'_
gS!~~z
~~l;!:~
O~~g~
3o",,(I))ito::Q
C ....::10
iilatO~~ i:!
"'-<lll > .... g
. ~ ~rI
~L:rttl::$~
Ii i ~ n ! ~ ~
o
0'00000'0000'
\2\212!212!lZ!'2!lZ!lZ!lZ!
0000000000
rIrIrIrIrIrIrIrIrIrI
(I)(/)(I) Ut(l)(I)cn(l)(I) (I)
"'''PI~~(I)'''DI'''I~U'J
~~~~~~~~!:;~
~5l~i!~;r::5liL:r~
Z"''''~-<''''''''Zi!l
~OlllZ ~OO~Z
o~~ !S!il~~~()
~...."' ~ dg~
i!lClJ;i c:"'-
ol"l~ ill"'~
.~::1 C
plg2 !;
~z ....
>
::I
~
~
:m+z
PI
~
~
0\
8~
I ~
...
...
en
t
~ i:I PREUMINARY lREE PRESERVA l10N PLAN
......
~ muCT LAWN TERRACE ESTATES
01 GOLDEN VALLEY. MINNESOTA
.
.......
o
..j::>.
'I'
) ( \
VI //1
I - I r
/
./ foCO I I
C5 ./ J
./ r
./ /'
9:,-- - -
~ 1..,(Q
--
I
-(
/----...
1 '\
{
I
I
1
!
I
I
\
i
\
I
\
\
\
"
I
I I
"'\
"
''-,
'-,
........
"
1>
- -
/
f./
If/
1/1 i( ('
/ //1)
////
////
////
/1.//
///~
//~/J
/I;/-
~/,
/
--
-----
---
I
........
'"
./- \
./ '\
/' I
/ .//, \ I
./ / "-----
/ r ./"-,----
/ .,..~ r -
,. ..- r'_
/ I" /' ,/
~~~~
......-I"U
1"1~::O .
t51"1~
1"1;;::~
~::i~
(;');;0
m)>-<
c=.t
-0-1
5z~
1"1::01"1
::01"1
o"U
~~
::OVl
1"11"1
0::0
-<
)>
-I
6
z
3::
::i
(;')
)>
-I
6
z
......
o
::0
3::
.. Of'
,.port _ ~ by ..... Of'
under my cI..a ...~ and
~~ _ ~ Iowt of the
:f3i. w_~
Pot... J. KL P.E.
Date: a/3/OS Reg. No, 14844
III
~ I ~
. ~
000_
....-. ........
7/20/OS - REVISal PER Cl1Y OOIIMENlS
a/3/OS - RElllSEO PER CRY 00MIIENlS.
NJD RAIN CARDEN DETM. SHEEr
Terra
1IrCJ'"11nc,....
-
6001 Glenwood Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422
7635939325 Fax: 763 512 0717
.
.
878.99
X
--
\.
'---
~ 880.49
.40
e
e
878,0
--........~
w--.-.____-...
--~---880 0
W . -... -- -- __
880.14
-
-
LOT 2 RAIN GARDEN
e
e
e
e
o
ex>;$j ~
~~ -
'r
00
:E
8
887.37 :x:
88(\7.22
LOT 5 RAIN GARDEN
'\
'\
'\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~
~
c?
'0
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
""
\
\
\
\
\
(Xl
-....J
t'J
or
(Xl 0
-....J :E
N
o .........
~ /(r
lex>
\~
\0
e 'J
871.23 \
\
\
:I '1- ~Y'
....__CO
RAIN GARDEN
\
\
I
I
--------------....:.:-.
/
~. //
W//
---
/
- 889.98
- -
-\--f~ ~RAIN,
\~o~
~o '0 GARDEN
'0
(250 S.F.)
e
/
/
/
/
"-
"-
8.>37.92 X "
8
e
/
I
/
/
/
/
cf
<::).
'b'O
//
o
<
cofTl ...
8~ ~
'r
00
:E
e
-'
LOT 4 RAIN GARDEN
L
I' MAX IlEPTIl
I
RAIN GARDEN PLANTS (TYP.)
-RECOMMENDED PLANTS,
SUNNY AREAS SHADY AREAS
NEV ENGLAND ASTER CA'lERPR.LAR SEDCiE
MARSH NAlllGllLD VIRGINIA Il..UEKLLS
cu. VEilS RDIIT SENSITIVE f"ERN
IDIESET
IlLUErLAG IRIS
SVITCHGIlA$$
GI1DEN ALEXANDEIl
RECOMMENDED SHRUBS'
SUNNY DR
SHADY AREAS SHADY AREAS ONLY
Il..ACK CHCICEIlERRY HEADlIV SWEET
RED DSIEIl 1llIG\IIIIID HIGH lUSH CItNlIEllllY
UIW _ ICH:YSUCI<LE
Pt/$$Y WIUDV
T'f'PICAl RAIN-.GARDEN DnAL
DESIGN 1NF'CRUA11ON:
1. RAIN GARDENS DESIGNED TO INFIL TRA TE T'lPE II 24
HOUR, 1" RAINFALL EVENT.
2.INFILTRAllON SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 48 HOURS
OF THE END OF THE RAINFALL EVENT.
3. INFIL TRA liON RATE. 0.05 IN/HR.
(SANDY CLAY SOIL). PER SHERRI BUS. BONESTROO
4. PLAN liNGS TO BE DETERMINED BY BUILDER.
5. RAIN GARDENS TO BE INSTALLED BY BUILDER.
6. ENGINEER TO VERIFY PERCOLA liON RATE PRIOR TO
FINAL PLAT.
I
I
I
L..E:GEND:
o B-~ DENOlES SOIL BORING
- - - - - - - DENOTES SILT FENCE/GRADING UIGT
- -1056- - DENOTES EXlS11NG CONTOURS
-1056- DENOlES PROPOSED CONTOURS
->>->>- DENOlES STORM SEWER
->-->- DENOlES SANITARY SEVIER
--a"----JN- DENOlES WATER"''''N
Xl056.23 DENOlES EXlS11NG SPOT ELEVA110N
X 1056.0 DENOlES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVAllON
EQf'.1C151.0 DENOTES ENERGENCY OVERflOW ELEVA110N
...
...
...
NO
N N
... ...
:g In
~ ~ ~
c CI) ..
! ~ ~
'8 i In
~ ~ i
.!! 8. '"
<::I .. 01
... .. In
o ~ '"
o - Ul
CD ::E ...
.
N
w
iilll
,.JX.AIRP.
~.
'.jX.
.
'V'.
s
~
ffi 0
C ~~
~ I-z
C) ~~
z(/) (I) ~
-.:.J lLJ
~e~~
D::C D:: <
<( ~>
~t5 ~ ~
[am i 9
D::lLJ <C 0
a.c -l C>
:I
o
:I
~
/lATe
7/7/05
.
SCAlE
IN
10
I'IfD..f:CT NO.
FEET
05-116
WARNING
'!HE LOCATIONS OF EXIS11NG UNDERGROUND UllLlTIES ARE SHOWN IN AN
APPROXlMA'IE WAY ONLY. TIlE EXCAVAllNG CONTRACTOR SHAU DElERlllNE TIlE
EXACT LOCA l10N OF ALL EXlSllNG UllUllES BEFORE CONMENCING WORK. '!HE
CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE fOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES VItIII
MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS fAIlURE TO EXACTLY LOCAlE AND PRESERVE ANY
AND AU UNDERGROUND UllUllE5.
88:'
SHCCT NO.
7
I- 10 'it" CRUSHED ROO<
IIEE1Nl REQUIIlOlOIlS OF
IInOOT 3137.2E FOR C,A-I
~
OTY ENQNEER
APPROVED IIAY 1. 2001
~
ROCK CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
~ey
REO 23110
IY.s.070
5.0' .... LENG1H POST
AT &0' IIAX. SPAONG.
~>-
:1
QE01EX11l.E FAIlRIC
'MRE _ REtlFORCDlENT
LFAIlRIC NlCHORAQE 1RENCH.
BAO<F1U. 'MlIt TAMPED
NAMAl. SOIL
- r.r: ~I
i
APPRO~ 2001
CITY ENGINEER REG 23110
SILT FENCE
~ey
gy-1IiC-010
..
r:
pj
~~
~~
~l
0~
~~
!~
~:i
~
I
IIJ;
· ~Ii~
I
I
11
ISI
f I
~ i
~
....-
~~ 2001
CITY ENClNEER REO 23110
SANITARY SEWER SERVlCEI~
WITH RISER ey
(DEEP SERVICE)
IIV.ss.040
..
J
"i
;.
"
\0
....~
I~*
: ~~Ii~
~ ~>- I!!!!!
I Z5~ ~~
~9!:,~~~
11~~:1a!~
~22h>C ~
11I1~et;~;8
~a7i1:"'li-
~ ~ I
In
! ~~
~~ ~~
~~ J~
~!l!"'<
~i~i!
I!!
i
....G!_
i
~
5
I
....
APPROVED III. Y I. 2001
~
TYPICAL WATER SERVICE I~
(ON 6" TO 8" DUCTILE ey
IRON MAIN)
TC7V
CITY EN<lINEER
REG 23110
IY.WM.e30
i
_r~
i~~
lll~c
~d
iii'"
lIldol
ipjl!l
id..
!iil
~
I
m
IIJ;
~ii~
I
I
II
51
ISI
! l
i ~
~ I
-
APPRO'oUlIIAY I. 2001 I 1.~11
P SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UU_l Vdlley
CITY ENQNEER REG 23110
IIV-ss.oao
.. ......-'KIIIJI
PllOPOSEI) CON'RlURS ARE 10 F1NISI€D CRADL SPOT tLEVA1lONS Al.ONG PllOPOSEI) CUllIl OENOTE
GUTTtR G1lADE UNLESS _WISE NOTED.
1HE CON1RACToR IS SP€CF1CAI.LY CAU110NED lItAT 1HE LOCA1lOll ANO/OR tLEVA1lOll OF DI$llNC
UlIUTES AS _ ON 1HESI: PLANS IS BASED ON REOCIRDS OF 1HE VARIOUS U1IU1Y C(lolPAHES ANO
WHERE POSSIIIl.E IltA5UREllENTS TAKEN II 1HE f1[lO. 1HE N'OllIIA1lOll IS NOT TO lit IlE1JEI) ON 10 .
EXACT OR COMPlL1E.
1HE CON1RACTCIR IlUST COfTACT ALL _n: UlIUTY ClCM'AHlES AT LEAST 48 HOURS _ >>IY
EXCAVA1lOll TO REQUEST EXACT f1[lO L0CA1lOll OF UTUllE$. IT SHALL lit 1HE RESPONSI8UTY OF 1HE
CQlTRACTOR 10 RELOCATE ALL EXIS11NO UTUTES lIHIOl CONfUCT 'MlIt 1HE PllOPOSEI) IIlPRO'lDlENTS
SHOWN 011 1HE PLAHS. 1HE CCNTRACTCIR SHALL \ERIfY L0CA1lONS OF EXIS1IlO UlIUTES BY COIlTAC1INO
00PH0l STAn: 0Nf: CALL (800-2&2-11") PlllCIR 10 >>IY EXCAVA11ONS.
1HE CON1RACTCIR SHALL NOT START _ UNll. ALL NECESSARY PERIIITS HAW BaN OBTAlHED. 1HE
CQlTRACTOR IS RESPOHSIllU FOR CClNF'ORWIlC TO THE REQUlRDlENTS OF 1HESE PEIlMTS.
1HE CON1RACTOR SHALL TAl<E ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY 10 AYClO PROPERTY OAIIAQE 10 AO.IACEIIT
PROl'ERlIES OURIHC 1HE CQl5TRUC1lOll PHASES OF 1HIS PRO.ECT. litE CONTRACToR '/ILl. . HELD
SOLn Y RESPOHSIBLE FOR ANY DAlIAGES TO AO.IACEIIT PROPERTES OCCURRING OURINC 1HE
CQlS1RUC1101l PHASES OF lHIS PRO.IECT.
SArrrY N01Ia: TO CCN1RACTCIRS: IN ACCOllD>>lCf: 'MlIt GOOALLY Aca:PTED CONSTRUCTlOIl PftAC1I<%S.
1HE CON1RACTCIR '/ILl. . SCIl.El. Y ANO COloFLETEL Y RESPCIN9IILE FOR ALL COHOI1I0IlS 011 THE JOB SITE.
tICUJllINC SArrrY OF ALL P!RSOIlS ANO PROPERTY OURINC PERFORII>>lCE OF THE -. 1IIS
RE~T Wl.L APPLY CON1INUOUSL Y ANO NOT . I.III1ED 10 NORIIAl. _INC HOURS. litE DUTY OF
1HE ENGINEER OR 1HE 0EYEl0PER TO COHOUCT CONSlRUC11ON REYEW OF THE CONTRACTORS
PERFORIIANCE IS NOT IN1ENOED TO IlCLUOE R[';IEW OF 1HE MiEOUACY OF litE CCNTRACTOR'S SAFETY
IlEASURES IN. 011 OR NEAR litE CONS1RUC11ON SITE.
1HE SITE WORK FOR 1HIS PRO.IECT SHALL IltET OR EXQEED 1HE 0EYEl0PER'$ I aTY'S OR LOCAl.
00'0f:RNIN0 UN"S SPECIF1CA11ON. lIIHCH E'IER IS 1HE IIOST S1RINOENT. THE SITE CONSTRUCTIOIl SHALl.
ALSO ca.Pl.Y WllIt 1HE REQUIROlENTS OF 1HE GEOTECH~ REPClRT.
1HE CON1RACTCIR SHALL COMPLETE THE SIn: CRAOIHC CONS1RUC1ION IN ACCCIROANCE WITH litE
REQUIREMENTS OF litE __S SCIIl.S ENGINEER. ALL SOl. TES1INO SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE
01lllER'S SllILS ENGINEER. 1HE CQlTRACTCIR SHALl. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COOROtNA lING ALL REClUtRED
SOl. TtSTS ANO INSPEC110NS 'MlIt litE SllILS EN<lINEER. ALL SOLS CER1If1CA1IOIlS SHALL BE PROYIDEO
TO 1HE OWNER ANO ENQNEER DURING ANO UPON COMPI..E1IOH OF litE PRO.IECT.
PRIOR TO litE PV<CEIIEHT OF litE _GATE BASE. A lEST ROLl. 'MLL BE REQUIRED 011 litE STREET
!IUBCRAOE. THE CONTRACToR SHALL PROYIllE A LOADED T_ AXLE TRUa< '/IlIt A GROSS WEICHT OF
2& TONs. 1HE OTY >>ID 0EYEl0PER'$ $(IlLS ENGINEER SHALl. . PRESENT DURING 1HE TEST ROU. 1HE
lEST ROlLING SHALL BE AT litE 0fRECTI0H OF 1HE SCIIl.S _ >>ID SHALL BE COMPLETED IN NIVS
AS DIRECTED BY 1HE SllIl.S ENGINEER. 1HE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL OETERIIlNE lIIHCH SECTIONS OF THE
STREET AREA ARE UNSTABI.E. CClRREC1IOH OF THE 9JllCIRAOE $(IlLS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN
ACCOROAN<lE 'MlIt 1HE REOUIREIIENTS OF THE $(IlLS ENGINEER.
1HE CCNlRACTCIR IS RESPONSIBlE FOR PRO\IIOIHC AND IIA1NT_C ALL lRAFF1C CONlROL OE\4GES SUCH
AS BARRICADEs. W_ SIGNs, DlREC1IOHAl. SIGNS I1.ACIlEN >>ID UGHTS TO CONtROL litE IIOYEIIENT
OF TRAFf'lC IlIIERE NECESSARY. 1RAmC CON1ROL OEYICES SHALL CON'ORII TO APPROPRIAn: IIINNESOTA
DEPAJmtENT OF TIlANSPOIlTA1I0Il ST>>IDA/IDS.
AnER THE SIn: CRAOIHO IS COIlPLETED. F EXCESS SOIL III. 1ERlAL ElOSTS. litE CCNlRACTOR SHALL
DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIl. MATERIAl. IN A 11_ AC<lEPTABLE TO 1HE OWNER ANO REGULADNC
AGENCIES 1llYOL'IED.
NO TREES OR SHRUBS ARE TO . flEIIOIIEIl 'MlItOUT 1HE PRIOR APPROVAl. OF 1HE OIlllER.
SAl.VAGED MATERIALS TO .COME PROPERTY OF litE OWNER.
TtIIPORARY ANO PERIIAHENT SEDlIIENTATIOH PONDS SHALl. . CONSTRUCTED WllIt 1HE H1IAl. ORAOINC.
1HE SEDIIENT IIUST . REIIO'IED F1tOII 1HESE POIlDs. AS NECESSARY. PRIOR TO COIlPLE11ON OF 1HE
PRo..t:CT.
ALL SLOPts ARE TO lit _ED TO 3:1 OR nATTtR, lH..ESS 01HER'llSE SPECIF1ED 011 1HESE PLANS.
1HE HA1URE OF 1HIS PRO.ECT 'MLl. BE CON$ISItNT WITH WIll. T IS REPRESENTED IN lHIS
SET OF CIOHS11IUC11ON PLNlS ANO Sf'[CIFICATIOIl!.
1HE IITtNOED SEOUENCINO OF IIAJCIll CONSTRUC1lOll AClMlIES ARE TYPICALl. Y AS
FQLLOWS;
I. INSTALL STAalzm ROa< CONSTRUC1ION ENTRANCE
2. 1NST.<LLA1lOll OF SILT rEIlCE AIlOUIIlI -
3. CLEAR ANO GRUB FOR .-T BASIN I POND INSTALL
... COHSIRUCT IIOIMENT BASIl II'OHO
5. CLEAR ANO GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE
e. S1IlP ANO STOQ<PU TOPSOL
7. ROUOH 0IlA0lNG OF SIn:
e. STA8IIJ2E OENUOEO AREAS AND STOCKPILES
t. INSTALL SANITARY SE1IIR, WATtRIIAIl STORM SE1IEIl ANO SEIMCElI
10. IlSTALL SILT rEIlCE I MET PROTECTION AIlOUIIlI CB'S
11. IlSTALL S1REET SEC1lOH
12. IiSTALL CUllIl ANO QUTTER
13. IlI1UIINOUS ON S1RlETS
14. I'INAL GRADE IIOUI.EYARO. IISTALL SEED ANO WLCH
Ill. REIICM: AOCUIIULATED SEOIIIENT F1tOII BASIN I POND
1e. WHEN ALL COHSTRUCTIOH AClMTY IS cOIIIi1EIt ANO TE SITE IS STABIU2ED. REIICM:
SLT FENCE ANO RESEED Nf'( AREAS _ BY THE REMOVAL
1HE CONTRACTOR ANO ALL SUBCON1RACTOIlS 1llYOL'IED 'MlIt A CQI51RUC11OH AClMTY
1HAT 0IS1URIlS Sin: SOIl. OR llHO _ A POLWT>>IT CCNtROL -
1OENT1f1ED IN 1HE STORM WAlER POLW11ON PRE'l!N11ON PLAN 1_> MUST COIIPL Y
WITH 1HE RE~TS OF 1HE HA11ONAl.I'Ol.WTIOH DlSCHAR<< EUliNATION SYSTtII
0IP0ESl CIIlERAI. PEIlMT (DATED ,IUGUST I. 2003 , ~00001 PA<lES 1-21) ANO >>IY
i.ocAL bcMJINING N1EJJICff HA_ .aJRISDlC11ON CCIlCERNIHC EROSIOIl ANO
SEOIIIENTA11ON CON1ROI..
1HE CONTRACTOR IS RESPON$IlLE FOR KUPIHC A COPY OF 1IIS _ (HAMA1I11!,
PLNlS ANO SPECS> 011 Sin: AT ALL 1IIES OF COIlSTRUC11ON AS WELL AS COPIES OF
API'LICAII.E PERIIITS AND INSPEC110N REPClRTs.
~. ~1ItW AND ~.ftW etlN~
1HE CClN1IlAC1lJft SHALL ASSUIIE CICU'LETt RESPOIlSIlIIUTY FOR COIl1IlOLLING ALL
EROSION ANO .-TA11ON OF 1HE PRO.IECT ArfEA 1HE CON1RACToR SHALL USE
lItlATt'i!R IIEAIlS NECESSARY 10 CONtROL EROSION ANO 5EOIIIENTA1lOll INCl.UOIIIO BUT
NOT IMTED 10 1HE rcuDWNO fl[ST IINlAGEMENT PRAC1ICtS (BlIP'$); ROa< Mac
DAIIS. ROa< EIl1RANCO NII)/CIR SLT fENCES _ ON 1HE 0IlA0lNG NIl) EROSIOIl
COH1RQ. PLAN. EIlOSION CONlRa. SHALL COIIIIEIlCE .lIt Sin: CRAOIHO NIl) CONTtU:
1HROUCHOUT 1HE PRO.ECT UNll. ACCEPT>>lCf: OF 1HE _ BY 1HE OWNER. 1HE
, COIlTIlACTCIRS ~ INCLUlG ALl. OESIOH ANO IIIPl.DIENTA1lOll AS REQUIRED
10 ~ EROSION ANO 1HE DEPOSITIHC OF SLT. 1HE _ IIAY. AT H1S/IlER
0P110N. DIRECT 1HE CONTRACTOR II H1S/IO IIE1HOOS AS 0EDlED RT TO PROTECT
PROPERTY ANO IIPIl<M:IIENTS. ANY OEPOSITIHC OF SILT OR Il1.O ON NEW OR DI$llNC
PAIoGIDIT 011 IN !lCIS1ING S10llII SEWIIS 011 SWALES SHALL lIE IIDICMD AF'lUl EACH
RAIN ANO AFfECTED AREAS CLEANED 10 1HE SA1ISFAC1lOll OF 1HE OWHER. ALL AT THE
EllPENSE OF 1HE CONTRACtat SLT fENCES SHALL BE REMO'IEO BY 1HE CONTRACToR
AnER 1HE 1UlIF IS ESTA8IJSHEI).
ALL OIST\IRBED AREAS SHALL . SEEDED ANO IM.CHED _ATtLY AF'lUl1'INAL
GRMiE IS ESTAIlUSHED IN ANY PAIl11CUI.AR ArfEA ~ NIl) IIUI.CHINO SHALL NOT
WAIT UN11. ALL CRAOIHC IS COIIPLE1ED 011 1HE EN1IRE SITE.
1HE LOCA1lOll OF AREAS NOT TO . _ IlUST . 1OENT1f1ED 'MlIt FLAGs.
STAl<Es. SIGNS, SILT rEIlCE [IC. fl[FCIRE CQl51RUC11OH .GINS.
CONSTRUC1IOH AClMTY - ER080Il PRE'l!N1ION PRACTICES
~ t# .. '" IIAX TIlE UNSEEDEO 'M1HOUT
~1t\#'t v M"INft WWI1tfn
SlEEPER 1HAN 3: 1 7 DAYS
10:1 TO 3:1 14 DAYS
nATTtR 1HAN 10:1 21 DAYS
ON Sl.OPES 3:1 OR CREATER IIA1lTAIl SHEET FLOW ANO _ZE RLLS ANO/CIR CUWES.
SLOPE LIIlG1HS C>>lNOT BE CREAlER lIt>>l ~ FEET.
ALL S10llII CIRAIlS ANO H.ETS IIUST BE PROTtCTED UNTl. ALL SCMlCf:S OF P01Df1IAL
IlISCHARQE ARE STABIU2ED
1DIPCIRARY SOIl. STOa<PLES IIUST HAW EFJECTM: SEmlENT CONTROL ANO CAN NOT
. PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR S10llII WATER CON~>>lC[ SYS1Dl$. TEM'OllARY
STOClCPLES 'M1HOUT SlONIf1CANT _T OF SL T OR CLAY OR CIRGAIIC MAlERlALS ARE
EXEII'T.
MWAW'RIIrIG AHO ILLClIN ~
DEWATtRIlO OR BASIl ~ (Lo.. PI.U'ED OISCHARCES, lRENCH/llITCH CUTS FOR
DRAIlAGE) RELATED TO THE COHSTRUC11ON ACTMTY THAT MAY HAVE TURIIlD OR
SEOIIIENT \.ADEN IlISCHARClE WATER IIUST lit OISCHAROEO TO A TEM'OllARY OR
PERMANENT SEOIIIENTA11ON 8ASIH 011 1HE PRO.IECT SITE WHENE\tJI POSSIIIl.E. F THE
WATER CNftOT . OISCHAROEO 10 A SEOIIIENTA1ION BASIN PlllCIR TO ENTERtlG 1HE
SURFACE WAlEI!. IT IIUST . TREATED '/IlIt 1HE APPROPRIAn: ~ SUCH lItAT 1HE
DISCHARGE DClES NOT AIl\CRSELY AFFECT 1HE RECElWIG WATER. 00W<SlREAM
I.ANOOIINERS OR WETLANDS. 1HE COfTRACTCIR IlUST ENSURE lItAT IlISCHARClE POINTS
ARE AOEOUATtLY PROTtCTED FIKlII EIlOSION ANO SCOUR. 1HE IlISCHARClE IIUST BE
DISPERSal O'I!R NATURAl. ROa< _. SANO BAGs. PLAS1IC SHEA1HING OR 01HEll
ACCEP1ED ENERGY DlSSlPATIOH IIEASUlES. MiEGUAn: 5EOIIIENTA11ON CONtROL
IIEASURES ARE REOUIRED FOR IlISCHARClE WATER lItAT CCNTAlNS SUSPENDED souos.
~"rItW~ >>m u....TF'N~
1HE CQlTRACTOR IS RESPOHSIllU AT ALL 1IIIES FOR 1HE IIAINTEN>>lCE ANO PRClPER
OPERA 1lOll OF EROSIOIl AND SEOIIIENT CQlTROL FACIU1IES. litE CQlTRACTOR SHALL AT
10__ IHSPf:CT. IIA1lTAIN ANO IlEPAlIl ALL 0IS1IRIm SUIIFAa:s ANO ALL EIlOSIOIl
AND SEDRIENT CONTROL FACIl.I1IES ANO SOIL STAIIIUZADON IlEASURES 0IlCf: E'lERY
SE'IEN (7) DAYS _ AC1I'I! CQlSTRUC1I0N ANO WITHIN 24 HCMIS FOLLO'MNG A
RAINFALL OF 0.0 INCHES OR CREATER UNTl. LANO-DlS1IIRB1HC AC1I\4TY HAS CEASED.
THEREAFTER THE CONTRACToR SHALl. PERFORII1HESE RE_TES AT LEAST
lIUI<LY UH1IL 'IEOETA1IW COlIER IS ESTABLISHED.
BASED ON INSPEC1IOH RESULTS 1HE CONtRACTOR NAY 1I000FY 1HE S'/IPPP II ORDER TO
_T POLWTANTS FROII LEAIIlNC litE SITE IlIA STORII WATER RUNCFF. litiS
IIOOIFlCA1IONIIUST BE IIAIlE WITHIN 7 CALEHDAR DAYS OF THE IHSPf:CTlOIl lH..ESS
0_ REQUIRED BY 1HE 1ERIolS OF 1HE PEIlMT. LEGAl., REGULA TORY. OR PH'\'SlCAL
ACCESS CCNSlRAIlTS.
lNSPEC1IOIl REPORTS IIUST lit KEPT 011 FILE BY THE CONTRACTOR AS >>I IlTECRAL
PART OF 1HE SW'PP FOR AT LEAST 3 YEARS FROII 1HE OATE OF COIlPLETIOH OF litIS
PRO.ECT.
~ I Lmtw ~nnN u.u....r.nswr.
1HE CCN1IlACTOR SHALL IIlPLDlENT 1H[ fOI.I.O'IINC POLLV1ION _DOll
II>>1ACENENT IlEASURES ON litE SITE:
SOLI) WASTE: COLLECTED SEDlIolENT. ASPHALT AND CQlCRETE IIIWHGS. FL0A1ING
0EBRlS, PAPER. PLAS1IC. FAIlRIC. QCNSTRUCTIOH ANO DEllOUDOIl DEBRIS >>ID OlltER
WASTES lIUST BE OISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IIUST COIIPl. Y WllIt IIINNESOTA
POLLV1ION CON1IIOL AQIOf(;t (1oI'CA) DISPOSAL REOUIROotENTS.
HAZARDOUS IIATERIALS: OL. OASOIJNE. PAINT ANO ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST
BE PROPERLY STORED. INCLUOINC SECONDARY CCNTAlHIlENT. TO PRE'lEHT SP\l.l.S, LEAKS
OR OlltER OISCHAIlOE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE NIVS IIUST BE PRO\IIOED TO
_T VANOAUSIot. STORAQE NIl) DISPOSAl. OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST . IN
CCIloIPU>>lCE 'MlIt MPCA REGULA1\OHS.
EXTERHAL WASHING OF TRUa<S AND OlltER COIlSTRUC1ION 'I!HKUS IIUST . I.III1ED
TO A 0Ef1NE0 AREA OF 1HE SITE. RUNOFF MUST . CQlTAlNED ANO WASTEWATER
PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DECREASING IS ALl.OYiEO ON SITE.
nNAl GT.dMII7.A.nON'
1HE CCNTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAl. STAlllUZATION OF 1HE SI1E ACCOROlNO THE
0I7INI1lOllS IN 1HE NPOES CENERAL PERMIT PART IV SECTION C. 1HE CONTRACTOR IIUST
SU8IIT A N01ICE OF TtRIIIlA1lOll (N.D.T.) 'Mn.! 30 DAYS AnER FINAl. STAIlUZATION
~J'SI~:g.::?~~::.t~~~: O'I!R ALL
...
...
...
N 0
~ ~
l8 In
.. ~ 12
" 0 ...
c : ..
l:s!
... :lE In
~ . N
j .. ('I)
c:=cn
.!! 8. ('I)
Cll .. '"
... ~ In
8.5&!
'" ::I ...
.
Jil~
IICIIiID
_1M
O/CCI(Q
p..IJVICRP.
1fIU'.
p.JJ(.
.
a..
a..
~ ~
0
.-s (/)(1)
~~
~ ~~
~ (/):E
w
c ~~
~
z mZ
>- i9
~
Z ~8
:i
a ;
It
DAIT
7/7/05
muc7iiii.
05-116
$HCC'7'iG
8
.