11-27-07 BZA Agenda
e
e
e
Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, November 27,2007
7pm
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chambers
I.
Approval of Minutes - October 23, 2007
II.
The Petitions are:
1801 Independence Avenue North (07-08-24)
Sandra Gunderson, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(c) Side Yard Setback
Requirements
. 2 ft. off the required 6 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point to
the side yard (north) property line.
Purpose: To amend the variance that was approved at the August 28,2007
Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to allow for the construction of a
larger main floor closet addition
III. Other Business
IV. Adjournment
763.593.8006 (TTY: 763-593-
may include large print,
'"
.
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
October 23, 2007
A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday,
October 23, 2007 at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota.
Chair Boudreau-Landis called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Members, Boudreau-Landis, Hughes, Morrissey, S
Commission Representative McCarty. Also present were Director of 8
Development Mark Grimes, Planning Intern Joe Hogeboom and A m
Lisa Wittman. Member Nederveld was absent.
II. The Petitions are:
675 Rhode Island Avenue South
General Label - Michael Bask
I. Approval of Minutes - September 25, 2007
MOVED by Sell, seconded by McCarty and motion car' d u
September 25,2007 minutes as submitted.
.
Request:
d. 6C(3) Rear Yard Setback
ired 20 ft. to a distance of 2 ft. at its closest
ard (south) property line.
Purpose:
xisting building into conformance with rear yard
ments.
r from Section 11.36, Subd. 6C(3) Rear Yard Setback
ements
. 2 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 18 ft. at its closest
point to the rear yard (south) property line.
To allow for the construction of an electrical/mechanical room
addition.
.
Hogeboom referred to a survey of the property and explained that property owner is
proposing to construct an 8 foot by 16 foot electrical/mechanical room addition on the
east side of the existing building that would encroach into the rear yard setback area.
He stated that the hardship noted by the applicant is that if he were to build the
proposed addition in a conforming location it would eliminate existing parking spaces.
He stated that the existing building also needs a variance because it was built too close
to the rear yard property line. He noted that this property received a variance in 1990 to
allow for a parking lot to be constructed into the front setback area.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
October 23, 2007
Page 2
Michael Baskfield, Applicant, explained that the proposed addition is needed because
they are upgrading the power in the building and they want to move the electrical and
compressor into this proposed new addition. He stated that they don't want to lose any
parking spaces because it would force his employees to park on Rhode Island Avenue.
McCarty asked if the proposed addition could be moved 2 feet toward the north so it
would not require a variance. Baskfield said that the proposed addition could probably
be moved 2 feet toward the north but he doesn't want to lose parking spa s which
would force employees to park on the street and would disturb the nei
M , seconded by Sell and motion carried unanimously to approve the
for 18 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 2 ft. at its closest point
to the r (south) property line to bring the existing building into conformance with
rear yard setback requirements.
ber of cars shown in
rkin t. Baskfield said no,
'ng spaces would be
ation. Baskfield said at
ked if cars could park in
w. He said that he is just trying to
up too many parking spaces,
Boudreau-Landis referred to the site plan and asked about the 10
addition. Baskfield explained that they are proposing the addif
because that is where the electricity comes into the building
doors are open neighbors have complained that they can he
putting them in the new addition would help with the n ise.
.
McCarty referred to a photo of the parking lot an
the photo would be an accurate number of cars
the parking lot is usually full. McCarty asked ho
eliminated if the addition was constructed'
least 2 or 3 spaces would have to be e .
front of the new addition. Baskfied sai
maximize his space and use it eff'
Boudreau-Landis opened th
comment, Boudreau-Lan .
Ing. ing and hearing no one wishing to
public hearing.
Grimes said he feels that
that would be okay
Sell agreed and said
problems in th
,,',,-',
nce for 2 feet would save a couple of parking spaces
uld prefer that people not have to park on the street.
:;,port this variance request to avoid on-street parking
sed addition could be shortened by 2 feet. Baskfield said
space.
.
MOVED by Sell, seconded by Morrissey and motion carried unanimously to approve
the variance request for 2 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 18 ft. at its closest
point to the rear yard (south) property line to allow for the construction of an
electrical/mechanical room addition.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
October 23, 2007
Page 3
\.
6466 Westchester Circle (07-10-30)
Fred Bruning, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(a) Side Yard
Setback Requirements
McCarty asked if the exi
brought into confor anc
1982 so it does con
setback.
. 2 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 13 ft.
point to the side yard (east) property line.
Purpose: To allow for a second-story addition above t
.
Hogeboom stated that Fred Bruning of Sawhorse Designer
on behalf of the property owner for a variance to allow for th
story addition above the existing garage. He stated th . the h
applicant is the oddly shaped lot and the fact that ther
less storage compared to a house with a basem
won't have living space encroaching into the set
been an email submitted by one of the neighbo
the variance request. He stated that ther
property. Grimes added that there sho
garage when an addition was built 0 t
explained that the reason a varia
because the measurements on
property line instead of perp
plied
a second-
by the
men hich means
oposed new addition
e no d that there has
owners against granting
r variances granted for this
nce granted for the existing
he home in 2006. Hogeboom
sn' equired for the 2006 addition is
aken from the house diagonally to the
I side red to be conforming or if it needs to be
om stated that the existing garage was built before
ew construction has to meet the 15-foot side yard
rvey and noted that the proposed addition measures 18 feet
om explained that only the living space was drawn on the
s supporting the proposed second story go to 13 feet from the
of the required 15 feet.
Sell s s that there are a lot of homes in that area that don't have basements
and tha them were built on fill or poor soils. Hughes questioned if not having a
basement should be considered a hardship.
.
Morrissey asked if the existing house were built 15 feet away from the property line as
required by current code if the proposed second story addition would need a variance.
Hogeboom said no.
Fred Bruning, Applicant, explained that the living space in the proposed second story
would be 18 feet away from the property line but the trusses for the new addition would
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
October 23, 2007
Page.4
have to bear on the non-conforming part of the existing garage to make the proposal
work. He showed an example of how the trusses would work.
McCarty asked the applicant if any of the neighbors agreed with the proposal. Bruning
said he wasn't able to contact all of the neighbors but the ones he did contact were
generally in favor of the project, they just wanted more information. Bruning noted that if
the variance isn't granted he could do some type of hand built roof line, but it would look
rather odd.
Grimes said there has als
property line so he woul
property line prior to issua
of the property line.
e sunlight
ring house face
d said he thinks the
Morrissey asked how much taller the addition would be to the peak t
now. Bruning said about 6 feet. Morrissey stated that the second
vertical addition going straight up from the existing house, it d
Bruning said they thought about the height of the addition a
windows on the side of the house facing the neighbors.
McCarty referred to the email from the neighbor who
being reduced and said that since both this hous
south he didn't think sunlight would be an isslAe.
new addition will have a negligible difference to
.
Grimes said he lined up two of the dra
difference between the existing peak
proposed new addition will be hig
the elevations was drawn incorr:
aid he thinks the height
peak of the roof of the
g agreed and noted that one of
onfusion regarding the location of the east
ro owner to verify the location of the east
buildi g permit. Bruning agreed to verify the location
.Iic hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to
closed the public hearing.
difference in the distance of the complying part of the house
liant house or the real difference at 2 feet away from the property
roposed addition went straight up from the existing garage she
ntly but if the existing house were 15 feet away from the property line
there w no issue. Grimes said that part of the issue is the odd triangular shape
of the lots in this area.
.
Sell stated that this house has been interpreted to be 19 feet away from the property
line for over 20 years and that the location of the existing house has never been
mentioned during the other 2 or 3 additions that have been done. He said this house is
built to its maxirnum size but this proposed addition won't expand the footprint of the
house and it is a minimal variance.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
October 23, 2007
Page 5
"
MOVED by Morrissey, seconded by Sell and motion carried unanimously to approve 2
ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 13 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east)
property line to allow for a second-story addition above the existing garage.
III. Other Business
Reschedule the December 25,2007 BZA meeting.
IV. Adjournment
The Board decided to reschedule their December meeting to Decem
The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 pm.
.
.
.
07 -08-24
1801 Independence Ave. N.
.
Sandra Gunderson, Applicant
.
,
. 1912 1913 1912 19l5 1912
,
, I
1908 1909 19M 1913 191)8
:It i
It! 1904 1905 li1ll2 1illl5 0 1904
i , ~
I Z
1900 9400 93!ill 9300 9250
i ,
EARlST ,
Z
ll12ll 1821 9385 9345
...
1816 1817 :z 1816
10 1817
...
;g
It
1812 1813 i 11112
~ 1815
I N.t 18i1!l > 1808 $
1 801 Independence Ave. < "","-
m
Z ,~
1804'" ~ r.;,;J'
l8iI5 1804 F'
:t IliIl.
m
,.-. 'l1rrHAVE N I - Z/' -
, 18lIll '/ '/,;;/ ;~/;~';:;; 1800
---
9300
i 172.0 1721
>-
~
;Ie 1716 1717 1720
X i "
...
x I 1713
m 1712
i -<
% ;x; ... 1709
0'1
I "',
:II:
)>0 1104 1705
-< "~.
... NAPER ST
~ ~
Z 1700 1701 1636
I, 9345 1636
;trtHA\te'l'4 NAl'ER ST " "
~ I-----
1632 1633 1630
.---.. ~
1628 1629 -
Ui2lJ 1629 ~
)>0 1624
< -
Hi:/:4 16Z5 m
1624 1625 :z:
<l) ,
, -
, 1622 1621
1620 16,21 162fl
,
M~(.,;~I\'f'i!flh'(:1Y.s~ C<apJ.1'i~:'I\ (C~ t.00ISG.lS~ , , 'ol121t
.
.
.
.
lIey
Planning
763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax)
Date:
November 19,2007
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
To:
From:
Joe Hogeboom, Planning Intern
Subject:
1801 Independence Avenue North
Sandra Gunderson, Applicant
Ms. Gunderson is the owner of the property located at 1801 Independence Avenue North. In
August, Ms. Gunderson received variances from City Code to allow for the construction of a
second story addition and a main floor closet addition. Ms. Gunderson is asking the Board of
Zoning Appeals to amend the original variance request (07-08-24), dated August 28,2007.
In August, Ms. Gunderson was granted a waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(c) of City
Code (Side Yard Setback Requirements.) Ms. Gunderson was allowed two feet off the
required six feet to a distance of four feet at its closest point to the side yard (north) property
line for the construction of a main floor closet addition.
After further consideration, Ms. Gunderson would like to build the main floor closest larger than
originally planned. The approved closet was approximately 2 feet in depth. The proposed new
closet is approximately 5 feet in depth. The proposed plan amendment does not increase the
width of the closet into the side yard setback area beyond the first plan. However, Ms.
Gunderson will need an amendment to the variance, because the proposed plans have
deviated from those that were approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals.
As detailed in Ms. Gunderson's original Zoning Code Variance Application, the hardship with
this property is that the home is currently small and the closet addition would allow for more
storage space.
The proposed project requires an amended variance from the following Section 11.21, Subd.
10(A)(3)(c) Side Yard Setback Requirements. The City's Zoning Code states that, in the case
of lots having a width of 65 feet or less, the north side setback shall be 10 percent of the lot
width. The width of this property is 60 feet. Therefore, the north side yard setback is 6 feet. Ms.
Gunderson requests 2 feet off the required 6 feet to a distance of 4 feet at its closest point to
the front yard (north) property line for the construction a main floor closet addition. Ms.
Gunderson requests re-approval of this variance with consideration of her amended site plans.
As mentioned at the previous Board of Zoning Appeals meeting, two variances were obtained
for this property on June 25, 2002 (in addition to variances approved in August, 2007.)
.
.
.
Upon the construction process of building a deck (which conformed to City Code) it was
noticed that the structure did not meet setback requirements. Variances were obtained from
the following sections of City Code:
Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback
Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(3) Side Yard Setback
Copies of past variance information have been attached to this memorandum.
Wittman, Lisa
~.~.."....~~~ww._",_.~_^_"'.'^'.~"'''",~w'~~.'~_~='.~,'^,.v^,W",'~'..~_'" .,.__~,~~.._.w"_,_','..'~=^~~"N.,~'m'_"_""",",_mm_~'__,~,,,~'.~~v_.~"m,','~",w~v,"_~,'m.__'..._=~,".'_~""'~""_'_~m'+'~~'_'~'~'",,-",,-"'_~'''''''Nm,~.,.,'m'N^~~.~,~,,''''~.'m.w._.~~~^~.w,v'^_"~,~m_".~~__.',"V.,~m~,~...",_,',~vm._.'.~"
't:
From: Gunderson, Sandra L (MN17) [sandra.l.gunderson@honeywell.cqmj
Friday, November 09, 2007 2:24 PM
Wittman, Lisa
Subject: Variance Change for Sandra Gunderson
Reason for changing the main floor bedroom closet.
Closet now is a depth of23" and length of 40".
The first architectural drawing indicated an additional 45" in length w ich was approved by the BZA (depth is still
23").
However, when the bidders looked at the closet all recommended chan ing it again to make it more functional by
adding another section.
I am now requesting approval for the main floor bedroom closet to be hanged/increased. The "bump-out" will be 45"
in depth and 5' in length. It will be attached to the existing closet in an "L-shape".
The bump-out closet, on the north wall, will be pulled in 5" closer to e house (it will not be lining-up with the
existing north wall). The reason for this is to save money when re-sidi g.
I,
Requested
chan ge
Sandra.L.Gunderson I
Honeywell Aerospace
Global Customer Care
612-951-6646
612-951-6516 - fax
.
11/9/2007
l andPlannlng
[and SilFvey,ng
5M5 Te:,flil!)
Clyillr Munidf'C1J
Ehljineerjng
,"f MJineer$
f
f
I
Surveyors
Mortgage Loan Survey for
-,
LL;
<J
( )
_.._J
c::(}
=-~=)
C~
\\J
~...,
I
,,-1"---""-
'r---- ',,.---
! I
I
I
I
I
(-._~ 1
~) !
j
I
I
i
,
:\ I
~ ',' " ' " ' ~
"'-., ...~- .-_.- ---.--..........--. ........ ----... '....~" ..----.--. '
~_. /.:":' /: F:- r-
__ /~.-" _'1 :/..) ....
I~<
,!;o
,
,
,..-.
\ ...1
2~ c.
,- -"~-"'~J
,,(',. '<', [' ~' ,',
\ . - ..l, ._ - ...~
,,' . ~ ~
\', lV...t~~.r-\~:2.:...,~
, "., 9
See-O'/\ .J
&-\of'.'
;;;Jd.. i~ 0\1"
14
).,1
Ij"
--- ... ..._._-_._......~-~./
j
J (
1....".
!', !.
'''...OJ ;.
t
1
I
I
I
I ' "
j t ~7:'; ~ -::::::::;::}:':j.!;,t:m~,! ~NJk:;:'!~~ ::::::~:r.:!~ r;~:~jj~~:;,
( /Je/~r phud lItJ/f1f:/,roperlg!l/Jo'flO lffJb}I'{'11J tJJwrned~(cepfltdbe holtlen(s~ mirkjlJge or~Jl "lUff irderesl"r..yulreu.h.Jf#Je ,~j~i v/ '
. ~'i/,jl ''ll''/~f!o.qf , It 15 f/fJd(;(5f{J{J{/ and ~lrf.t.dIIOm(JIil.J.m~nf...~ hate ken ;loaM;;Y Ihe fvr pIJ5e of e..{lobj,V1~" kJ fme5 . Ir iJ;JlI.!1dor;9tp'-ner5:
1 J>/lJ.'" ....... (1 i\' .... . . . ........ SUBURBAN tNfiJNftJ?JN6.fNC
jkM~. ilff.\ __:_..:..____dtJIj , _._l.__d..-"...:-,...,.......______,_- AJU:1_." , .
[nomcr r:~ grid NJr~f!!;I1lr:5
.j
IJ>~:_..
... _ '" 'b.._ _ ~'."_...."-"-_r~..."o'.~. .,,,,,_,,,~, ....~. _......_"....... . ..... -oF'._'- ...."__.,.., ......... ...,__...~__....,."....__..<. ..._..,;....u<_.<,.-._,_~
.
.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
August 28, 2007
Page 3
to 1 to approve the following
.
1801 Independence Avenue North (07-08-24)
Sandra Gunderson, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(c) Side Yard Setback
Requirements
. 2 ft. off the required 6 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point to
the side yard (north) property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a main floor closet addition
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(c) Side Yard Setback
Requirements
. 2 ft. off the required 6 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point to
the side yard (north) property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a second story addition
Hogeboom referred to a survey of the property and stated that the applicant is proposing
to construct a main floor closet addition and a second story addition both of which would
encroach into the side yard (north) setback area. He stated that the hardship noted by the
applicant is that the current house is a small 2-bedroom home and adding this addition
would allow more storage and living space.
Sell noted that this property received variances in 2002 to bring the existing house into
conformance and asked about the need to grant side yard setback variances again.
Hogeboom explained that the variances granted in 2002 were for the existing conditions at
that time and any new construction has to meet setback requirements.
Todd Knutson, Bruce Knutson Architects, Architect for the project, stated that the first
variance request would allow an existing closet to be extended in order to create a more
usable closet space and the second story addition will use the existing footprint of house.
Grimes stated that eaves and overhangs are allowed to go 30 inches into a setback area.
He asked if the eaves on the proposed second story addition would meet these setback
requirements. Knutson said yes.
.
.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
August 28, 2007
Page 4
Hughes asked about the square footage of the existing house. Knutson said he didn't
calculate the existing square footage but it is probably less than 1,000 square feet.
Boudreau-Landis opened the public hearing.
Eric Johnson, 1720 Independence Ave. N., asked if neighboring properties are affected
when variances are approved. Boudreau-Landis explained that a variance affects only the
property receiving the variance.
Hearing and seeing no one else wishing to comment, Boudreau-Landis closed the public
hearing.
Boudreau-Landis said he doesn't see a hardship in this case, but he doesn't have any
issues with the proposed additions because the footprint of the house will remain the
same.
Hughes said he thinks a 900 square foot home is a hardship in regard to selling the
property and for livability. He added that the proposed addition is not intrusive so he would
support granting the variance requests.
McCarty said it is also a small lot and a more typical sized lot probably wouldn't need
variances.
MOVED by Morrissey, seconded by Sell and motion carried unanimously to approve the
following variance requests:
. 2 ft. off the required 6 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point to the side yard
(north) property line to allow for the construction of a main floor closet addition
. 2 ft. off the required 6 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point to the side yard
(north) property line to allow for the construction of a second story addition
Request:
HogeboQ eferred to a survey of the operty and stated that t
to c ruct a garage addition on to th front of his existing garage.
.
.
.
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2002
A regular meeting of the Golden V ley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday,
une 25,2002, in the Council Cha bers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley,
. nesota. Chair McCracken-Hun called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.
Those esent were Chair McCrac n-Hunt and members Cera, Sell, Smit
Planning ommission Representat e Shaffer.
Olson and cording Secretary Lis Wittman.
I.
29,2002
MOVED by Shaffer,
May 29,2002 minutes
unanimously to approve the
II.
Request:
11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks
isting home into co ormance with side yard setback
Olson state hat the applicants w uld like to build an addition to their existing home.
He explai d that the proposed ad ition would conform to setba requirements but
that the xisting home is not in con ormance with the side yard setb k requirements.
MO D by Smith, seconded by C ra and motion carried unanimously to
est for 1.4 feet off the require 15 feet to a distance of 13.6 feet for the
me at its closest point to the we side yard property line.
1801 Independence Avenue North (Map 20) (02-6-30)
Sandra Gunderson, Applicant
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback
. 8.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 26.6 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line
along Independence Avenue North.
.
.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2002
Page 2
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard
setback requirements.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks
. 2 feet off the required 6 feet to a distance of 4 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the north side yard property
line.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback
requirements.
Olson stated that the applicant would like to add a deck to her existing home. He
explained that the proposed deck conforms to setback requirements but that the
existing home is not in conformance with the side and front yard setback requirements.
MOVED by Smith, seconded by Sell and motion carried unanimously to approve the
request for 8.4 feet off the required 35 feet to'a distance of 26.6 feet for the existing
home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Independence Avenue
North and 2 feet off the required 6 feet to a distance of 4 feet for the existing home at its
closest point to the north side yard property line.
5121 Circle Down (Map 9) (02 -31)
fred Minniti A Iicant
quired 15 fee a distance of 13.95 feet for
point to the east side yard
Purpose:
Olson stated that the ap . ant would like t add a deck to xisting home. He stated
that the proposed de ould conform to s tback requirements that the existing
rmance with the side y rd setback requirements.
MOVED haffer, seconded by Sell and otion carried unanimously to ap ve the
reque or 1.05 feet off the required 15 fee 0 a distance of 13.95 feet for the e . ting
ho at its closest point to the east side ya property line.
2
-~_-------.. \.
=iftlC::rl...II;,~":.._,, '---".'. \ t-
-~.;- ",
~I~i-II--l'\
I 1-" " -
..,. ",", ;..,- - ~-- I11III
""(.1, ~~{~,~~: 1P,'\ I i .~t
h~",'" -'j!j:":<' -', .""rt-" I I ~
r-~',,;-:~;~ (~~i ,1.'1:';; ,,: I. ..~ I
.' 1 .' I.
====1 ill
====l
I
I
,
I
,4
~" ~.r
,.4.?", ,_ ._ '_
,." ~"."
4~1
,",f;
<;~ ;.,0;,
a'l.
':~.~
.,
il'
I
':"".:1.
,'''','(
c"
';:'1
.'" . ~"...
r-
~;..,.
:~.
~'"
':>,
,,-"1
'\. .
.
'!:
..~
"t'~
'~ !
~i
.'!;
y~ ,....,
~~ . ~~ -~"i
~~ .. ~~
:j
.Jr-
, .\..~;
>
< .
.
~J;
'",~
I '~'
l'
"
.,t,~^
1" "~
- ----
:i.
\.., '"
'\
\
\
"
\
\
\
.
7/23120072:22:38 PM
~ ell
:I=- gJ
t:tl-
~5 "'l
~
~ ~
-
~
.
~~
~::t
:t::~
=z
II ,.
~r
~~
.
xz
~~.
ai
Ii
()
z
o
t:=
~
GUNDERSON ADDITION
~JJ
~'l
a;~
t~
~
r
l:~
~~
23
~2
\lI"
~~
~U1
\lIC
y~
Zm
~JJ
(\
{)
\lI
~
it~
DATE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAN SPECIFICATION OR RE.
PORT WAS PREPARED BY ME
OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUP-
ERVISION AND THAT I AM A
REGISTERED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
..... -
00
S
1801 INDEPENDENCE A V. N.
GOLDENVALLEY,MN.S5427.
RIReE
KNUTSON
~
REGISTRATION NO: 11789
530 NORTII 3RD ST. SUIrE 530
MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55401
PHONE 612-332-8000 FAX 612-332-7504
WWW.KNUTSON-ARCIllTECTS.COM
.
.
~~
~
~\
cA
~~J6
~.t~
3 ~~
)>
(i; t:I
~.~
i ~
~
.
..
l07 11 :13:34 AM
~ J>, ~
,~ ~
~ ~
-
:!:~
~':{
:t;:k
=Z-
'II 11
~r
q~
.
J-t:
.0
Z
::'\'
Ii
"
"
1\ - Z
" ,
, ,
, ,
, I
I I
, ,
'-cJ
~"I\
~~
~!
=\X
-<
~l\
~~
~.
~~
~O
~ C'~
... -
~~
0>
.
g DATE: BRlLe) .p~iii ~ ~
GUNDERSON ADDITION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS II'ZIP
PLAN SPECIFICATION OR RE. o~~ ~
~ , PORT WAS PREPARED BY ME ..Jill fa
OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUP. KNUTSON ~~ ~ -;J
, ERVISION AND THAT I AM A
- REGISTERED ARCHITECT -
gg tv
1801 INDEPENDENCE A V~ N. UNDER THE LAWSOFTHE ~ ~
- STATE OF MINNESOTA. 530 NORm 3RD ST. SUITE 530
GOLDEN VALLEY, MN. 55427 MINNF..APOLIS. MN. 55401
PHONE 612-332-8000 FAX 612-332-7504 ~
WWW.KNUTSON-ARCHITECTS,COM
REGISTRATION NO: 11789
.
_ ....AJ
4 18" ENG-TRUSSES~
, @ 19.2" O.C.
4 18" ENG-TRU~g,~
@ 19.2" O.C.
i\i~
.
.