The URL can be used to link to this page

07-25-06 BZA Agenda e e e Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, July 25, 2006 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - June 27,2006 II. The Petitions are: 303 Sunnyridge Lane (06-07-13) Kenneth & Kimberlee Linden, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 16.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 18.4 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Poplar Drive. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a sunroom addition 341 Westwood Drive North (06-07-14) Robert Allen Olson, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(1) Front Yard Requirements . 8.5 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 26.5 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Westwood Drive North Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition 3225 Lee Avenue North (06-07-15) Betty McCool, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(2) Accessory Structure Front Setback Requirements . 19.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 15.40 at its closest point to the front yard property line along Adell Avenue North Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition III. Other Business IV. Adjournment . . . Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 27, 2006 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Landis called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Members Landis, McCarty, Nederveld and Planning Commission Representative Waldhauser. Also present were Director of Planning and ent Mark Grimes, Planning Intern Kristin Gonzalez and Administrative Assistant Sell was absent I. Approval of Minutes - May 23, 2006 Waldhauser referred to paragraph 5 on page 7 and stat that the home was constructed before (not after) the which created the nonconforming situation. nce should read sho eland ordinance MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by McCa May 23, 2006 with the above noted correct" ied unanimously to approve the II. The Petitions are: 540 Cloverleaf Drive (06-0 Sharon Arndt A lic Request: .21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Setback required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 5 ft. at its closest point to e (west) yard property line. for the construction of a second garage stall survey of the property and explained that the applicants are proposing nd garage stall. She stated that the finished garage would be 22 ft. x 22 ft. ed 5 feet from the side (west) yard property line. McCarty referred to survey and stated that the depth of the proposed garage stall is 29 ft. Sharon Arndt, applicant stated that the existing garage is 29 ft. deep because the back part of it is part of the kitchen. She said the new garage stall will be 29 ft. deep as well but part of the space will be for storage. She said that she is the only one with a single stall garage in the neighborhood and that her neighbors very much approve of the proposal because it will enhance the neighborhood. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 27, 2006 Page 2 . Waldhauser asked the applicant if she had considered any other options. Arndt stated that if she were to build a garage on the east side of her property it would be closer to that neighbor and it would be on the opposite side of the property from the existing garage. McCarty said that the proposal seems to make sense. Grimes added that it would be very difficult to construct a detached 2-stall garage on this property that would meet setback requirements. Landis opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to closed the public hearing. la build the faces the backyard of Nederveld stated that there is clearly hardship with this proposal has only one garage stall. He added that the proposal would n on the lot and he is glad to see that a 5-foot setback area is b Waldhauser concurred that this location would be the m proposed garage. She added that the side yard on t . the adjoining neighbor. MOVED by McCarty, seconded by Waldhau variance request for 7.5 ft. off the require the side (west) yard property line to allow ied unanimously to approve the of 5 ft. at its closest point to I n of a second garage stall. . Request: .21, Subd. 10(3)(a) Side Yard Setback required 15 ft. to a distance of 5 ft. at its closest point to e yard (north) property line. for the construction of a new tuck under garage with living space Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (E) Accessory Structure Requirements . 361 sq. ft. more than the allowed 1,000 sq. ft. of accessory structure space . Gonzalez referred to a survey of the property and explained that the applicants are proposing to build a new two-stall garage with living space above. She explained that the proposed new garage would be located 5 ft. from the side (north) yard property line and that the total Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 27, 2006 Page 3 . accessory structure space would exceed the 1,000 sq. ft. limit by 361 sq. ft. (including existing garage space. Nederveld noted that there would be 4 garage stalls. Gonzalez concurred. Landis referred to the survey and asked if the area referred to as heated storage is included in the accessory structure square footage. Grimes stated yes and explained that the staff would consider the heated storage area accessory structure space because the access is through the garage not directly through the house. Waldhauser stated that the actual parking space area is less than 1,000 proposed storage areas are making it go over the 1,000 sq. ft. limit. Heyer referred to the side yard va order to accommodate the a to the property survey and the proposed living space to addition will fit in with es stories and won't be to the side yard set r She referred to t are the stee buildable applicants the t wher said she spoke wall. She asked if Grimes noted that this is a very unique home and the applicants so the obvious solution is to put the new living space above the Waldhauser referred to the retaining wall on the north side of t with the neighbor and found out they have rights to use that changes the view of the setback requirements. . Kristene Heyer, Keith Waters & Associates, archit original designers of this home and that it wa that Scott and Cyndi Barrington purchase are also planning a kitchen expansion an requirements. ject, stated that they were the ith no children. She stated d explained that the applicants on at do meet the setback stated that they need the variance in er who will soon be living with them. She referred a very steep slope and that they are trying to get e mal evel of the home. She stated that the proposed home and that it will all be contained within one and a half existing home. She explained that if they were to meet fiey would only have a 10ft. sliver of land to work with. pp ication and explained that they feel the hardships with this lot triangular shape, the large front yard setback area, the restricted Iveway access and the limited parking. She added that the sked by the City not to park on the street because of the blind curve at iveway comes out on Westwood Drive South. Heyer sta ey have really looked hard at this proposal and they feel the proposed garage/livin ce addition is in the least obtrusive location, it is screened by trees, it stays within the original design of the home and it is the only feasible way to get more living space on the main level in this home. . Heyer referred to the variance request regarding the amount accessory structure space and explained that they feel some of what is being called accessory structure space really isn't. The back part of the existing garage will be converted to a hallway and a coat closet and part of the proposed new garage space will be for mechanical equipment and storage. She added that there really is no basement in this house so they need the storage space being proposed. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 27,2006 Page 4 . Grimes referred to the triangular shaped storage space in the back of the existing garage and stated that if there is a door installed between it and the proposed new hallway leading to the new garage then it could probably be considered part of the house and not accessory structure space. McCarty said he thought the proposal would still have over 1,000 sq. ft. of accessory structure space. Grimes suggested that maybe they build a new one stall garage. Heyer stated that would also be too close to the side yard property line and it is the living space above the proposed new garage that is really their main concern. A one stall garage would not cre h living space above. Gonza for their this proposa pace next to it id they would still need Scott Barrington, applicant, stated that because of the slope of th the garage they need the additional space in order to turn their forward out of their driveway. Landis suggested having a one stall garage with an ope which would still allow them to have the living space the side yard variance. Cyndi Barrington, applicant, stated that they' any objections to their proposal. the neighbors and no one has . Waldhauser referred to the retaining be built and asked how the hill will stated that the back wall of the gar always work with structural e where the proposed addition would hose retaining walls are removed. Heyer b e the retaining wall. She added that they ke sure what they are building is built properly. Waldhauser asked if the dri same. e. Heyer said the driveway would remain the Waldhauser refe driveway. Mr. Bar it is very har driveway down the d d stated that it looks like five cars could park on the that the whole house was built back in the corner of the lot and of their driveway. He stated that they need the space on the eferring to in order to turn their cars around and drive forward ause it is not feasible to back out of the driveway. d that the applicants could change the interior of the house to make space yer explained that there would be too many stairs for her to climb and that the living space they need on the main level. McCarty suggested that since they already have to excavate they could build additional living space behind the existing home. Heyer stated that there is only approximately 10 feet in that area behind the home and if they were to expand the house in that direction the roofs would not meet or drain properly. . Grimes asked how visible the proposed addition would be from the street. Heyer stated that they feel that it will be very hard to see the proposed addition at all from the street. She stated Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 27,2006 Page 5 . that she doesn't know what the City's intent is regarding the 1,000 square feet of accessory structure space, but she assumes it is because they don't want to see a bunch of garages lined up in a row. She said they agree with that and they've tried to design the new garage space with that in mind. Landis opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Landis closed the public hearing. Keith Water to the rea it wouldn't e desire in this 'ance request for more n es that can't be y buy a home. McCarty asked if there were any provisions not allowing variances when originally subdivided. Grimes said he didn't think so. He added that in t . pretty good justifications for variances from a topography standpoint McCarty said he is having a hard time allowing that much build' property line. Waldhauser said she understands that the extra garage proposal; it is the living space so she has less conce accessory structure space. She said however, that expanded and that is something people should re . Heyer stated that aft~r the proposed addif which is under the 30% allowed by the CI ratio is still only at 25 or 26% Nederveld stated that additionalliv' the Board is limited by state statut hardship criteria, ecessarily a hardship, He explained that hink this proposal meets the state statute Mr. Barrington said he hea said he thinks they've itt what alternatives they City Councilor ta rd sa g no and asked what alternatives they have. He asonable proposal that is unobtrusive and wants to know Id explained that they can appeal a negative vote to the equests in order to come up with a different plan. project, stated that the further they try to build up into the slope ore lateral pressure there would be against the retaining walls so that the location they are proposing to build in is really the only place on ing could be built. She said that she'd be willing to grant the variance to allow more t he allowed accessory structure space because there is no basement storage space. She added that sometimes houses like this one aren't suitable for a growing family. Mrs. Barrington said that is like saying peoples lives are never going to change and she thinks that the City would want to keep taxpayers in Golden Valley, . Waters stated that there is a clear hardship in this case. He said they've done the very best they can to try to stay within the setback area. They are not going any closer to the neighboring property and no precedent would be set if the variances were granted. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 27, 2006 Page 6 . McCarty said it seems to him that there are other options that wouldn't encroach so far into the setback area. Mr. Barrington said that on a normal lot that would be true, but not on this lot. He said they have gone out of their way to make this addition unobtrusive and that it has to be located in the spot proposed because the living space needs to be on the main level for his mother-in-law. McCarty said he understands the applicant's proposal but the Board has limitations and is trying to be flexible. MOVED by McCarty, seconded by Nederveld and motio requested variances until a full Board is present. ave the inded rd were Ir request Grimes noted that there was one member absent and told the applican option of tabling their request in order to present their proposal to a f them that they also have to option to make their request to the Ci to deny their application at this meeting. Mr. Barrington asked until it can be heard by the full Board. 319 Hanley Road (06-06-12) Bruce Fraser & Michelle Bi elow.J . Request: 0(A)(1) Front Yard Requirements d 3 0 a distance of 27.2ft. at its closest point perty line along Hanley Road. Purpose: Request: ction 11.21, Subd.10(A)(1) Front Yard Requirements ff the required 30 ft. to a distance of 19 ft. at its closest point to ront yard property line along Hanley Road. allow for the construction of an open front porch Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(3) Side and Rear Yard Requirements . 2.5 ft. off the required 5 ft. to a distance of 2.5 ft. at its closest point to the side (south) yard property line. . Purpose: To bring the existing shed into conformance with setback requirements Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 27,2006 Page 7 . Gonzalez referred to a survey of the property and explained that the applicants are proposing to build an addition onto their existing home and an open front porch. There is also an existing shed that is located too close to the rear yard property line. Waldhauser asked if a variance to allow the shed to remain where it is were to be granted, would it be permanent. Grimes explained that if a variance is granted for the existing shed it would only be good for this existing shed and not for any future sheds. Bruce Fraser, applicant, explained that the proposed open fron over the existing stairs and that there is a foundation wall und old well room below. plain the home's ion. Fraser referred to tic system used to be located. s why they aren't proposing to ed that they are trying to avoid pro sed addition can not be moved then butt up against an existing e planning a phase 2 construction project hat would also prohibit moving the xisting home. Bigelow added that there are also a swell. Grimes referred to the proposed open front porch and explained that typi porches are allowed to be built to within 30 ft. of the front yard property home built in 1941 was only built 25 ft. away from the front yard pro . Waldhauser referred to the application and asked th previous septic field that lies near the end of the pr the survey of the property and pointed out the are Waldhauser asked if they could build over th build the addition further back. Michelle Bi hitting any underground pipes. She expla back toward the rear yard because t bedroom in the house. Fraser expl and that a staircase is proposed t proposed addition further to t lot of mature trees they are Grimes stated that he . in 1941. He said also t problems with se City had setback requirements when this house was built streets are built after the houses so that can cause d that if the home were to be built today, it could meet the y need the variances requested because of the way the home riginally. see how they are going to avoid hitting the sewer lines when the build r stated that they aren't going to have to dig that deep and there are ways of er lines. McCarty asked the applicants if there was any flexibility in moving the addition back toward the rear of the lot so that it would meet the front yard setback requirements. Bigelow explained that if the addition were moved back there would be no hallway and the addition would be butting right up against a bedroom. She stated that it would look horrible to add an addition farther to the south because it would look like a second house was attached to the existing house with a hallway in between. Fraser added that they have looked at many other options. . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 27,2006 Page 8 . Grimes explained that this proposal is different from the last proposal because Hanley Road probably wasn't built when the house was. McCarty said he is struggling with allowing this large of a variance. Bigelow stated that they have talked to their neighbors and they want to see the neighborhood revitalized and that this house has never been renovated. McCarty asked the applicants about their plans to add onto the kitchen. Bigelow explained phase 2 of their plans and where the kitchen and new stairway would be I McCarty said he was concerned about th request from the neighbors across th neighbors at 322 Hanley Road are' ere it is It as alk eeliminating a Landis asked why the entrance from the proposed new addition had being proposed. Behr explained that if the opening in this phase 1 proposed it would eliminate the phase 2 kitchen plans because through the kitchen every time they wanted to get to the stairw proposed bedroom which is why they are doing the this whole r Bigelow stated that the hardship is the fact that the e' . yard property line and that if it were built at the 35 any variances. Fraser added that if they built the a right at the neighbor's deck from their bedroo s built at 25 ft. to the front e would have no need for r back they would be looking . the Board ruled on the variance y Road. Bigelow stated that the oposal. Landis said he is still struggli said that if the house were would look very bizarre. Beh and how the addition slopes down more the addition cannot be moved further back. Bigelow ould stick out beyond the existing garage and conc n about pushing the addition back is the roof lines hed to the existing house. Fraser added that the property eygo. ting structure is non-conforming and that it doesn't make sense back to today's setback requirements. He said he is comfortable ouse were conforming they wouldn't need any variances. Grimes at he is also concerned about the architectural integrity of the house if .he new addition back 8 ft. further from the front of the house. He added -N he City needs to do what is best for the neighborhood and that the City did e built in its current location. Landis opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Landis closed the public hearing. . Waldhauser said she is alright with the proposal because of the placement of the existing home and she can see that it would be easier to tie in the roof lines if the addition were not setback further to the rear of the lot. . . . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 27, 2006 Page 9 McCarty said he has no problem with the variance request regarding the location of the existing shed, but he does have concerns with the other requests because of all of the room elsewhere on the lot. Nederveld said he is in favor of granting the variance requests. He said he thinks it's a reasonable proposal and he likes that the proposed addition is setback a couple of feet from the front of the existing home. He said that pushing the addition further back would cause real structural problems. He said he his also alright with the proposed open front porch because of the well room foundation underneath it and the problems they've seen wi W ell rooms. McCarty said he would like to vote on the variances separately. MOVED by Nederveld, seconded by Waldhauser and motion c variance request for 7.8 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance the front yard property line along Hanley Road to allow for the c home. McCarty voted no. The hardship for the construct placement of the existing home. ve the est point to n addition to the the original MOVED by Nederveld, seconded by Waldhauser the variance request for 11 ft. off the require the front yard property line along Hanley porch. The hardship for the construction existing home and the fact that there . the proposed porch. rried unanimously to approve of 19 ft. at its closest point to onstruction of an open front ont porch is the placement of the undation walls already underneath MOVED by Nederveld, seco variance request for 2.5 ft. side (south) yard property Ii requirements. rty and motion carried unanimously to approve the ft. to a distance of 2.5 ft. at its closest point to the isting shed into conformance with setback III. IV. djourned at 8:55 pm. . 06-07 -13 303 Sunnyridge lane . Kenneth & Kimberlee linden . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 25, 2006 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Kristin A Gonzalez, Planning Intern Subject: 303 Sunny ridge Lane Kenneth & Kimberlee Linden, Applicant Kenneth and Kimberlee Linden own the home and property at 303 Sunnyridge Lane. The applicants are requesting a variance from Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1), Front Yard Setback requirements, in order to construct a sunroom addition. A survey was required to obtain information regarding the existing structures on the property. The proposed addition will bring it to within 18.4 feet of the south side property line along Poplar Drive. The applicants are planning an addition to their home. This new addition will consist of a sunroom and basement space. This addition will be located on the rear of the home. The applicant states that the hardship is the current placement of the existing home. The house is already 16 feet into ttle 35 ft. front yard setback on the south side. With the current home design, this is the best placement for this addition. The project requires the following variance from the following section of the City Code: Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1), Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the required minimum front setback shall be 35 feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. The requested variance is for 16.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 18.4 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Poplar Drive for the addition. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1956. The lot received a variance from the Council in 1953 to waive the setback along Popular Drive to allow for the construction of the home. No other major additions have been made to the house since that time. 4U1i 125 4121 41U 4A9 . 4200 4124 4la 41Ol!l BEVERLY AVE~^ 41H In 4111 4113 315 l ~J:II-l 245 41Z5 . :w. m 219 :lfi5 201 \I"""!""""l"'1hkd\lS ^ C~tCfl.03lSW:m5 . 401 z 3 I % . WOODSTOCK AVE 4U 420 4U 405 416 401 3D 404 i m 400 i 317 !Z no 3U. 3D au - .ua - 408 4n 411 480 401 324 m no 4015 .~. .. ....~ POPlAR DR NO 235 no 2llO Statement of Hardship . Kimberlee's parents built the house at 303 Sunnyridge Lane in 1957. At that time they received a variance from the city to build the house facing Sunnyridge Lane instead of facing Poplar Drive. The front of the house is approximately 37 feet from the property line and the Poplar side of the house is 18' 4" from the property line. The back of the hOuse faces the alley, 60 feet from the property line. The location of the four-season sunroom is the only logical place that would keep in style and character of the house. Placing it off the dining room and kitchen would not extend the building any closer to the Sunnyridge or the Poplar property lines but would only extend out 13.5 feet toward the alley, still allowing approximately 55 feet from that property line. It is the only location that would allow access from the main level of the house and allow the expansion of the basement. In addition, it is the only location that would not endanger the many mature oak trees on the lot. We are adding this sunroom to enable us to enjoy our wooded backyard year-round without having t() worry about the weather, outside allergens or disease carrying insects. Please feel free to visit our home to view the site. Respectfully Submitted. . Kenneth and Kimberlee Linden July 3, 2006 . City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Varianc~ Application 1. Street address of property involved in this application: .3 0 3 S l4 N NY RID 6-J;; L A-tJ E. 2. Applicant: K \ rY\ BE:42t.r;:,;;: (LYSNE:) L \N DEN ~ k'ENNo-H- 1-JN DEN Name 303 c<S LANNYR,) f)(rE LANE.. 6-0L~ VA-I-1G-Y NtJ.m2 Address ' City/State/Zip / ( 9S"2.- R'57-ijJ2J.J, 763-3 7L( -'-I(i~1 76~s- ;23/-I-Oo?:>6 Business Phone Home Phone Cell Phone k'IM_ L \NOE"IJ (Q) (j()w1c.Arr, NET Email Address 3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. FGul2.. SSA$thJ SLANR~M D.J ,TIt Fu.J-L- >>'f\SEMEklr A-r-Ji) ExPA.MJ)ED BAG~t+ALL CJ'JEI<.. ~)() S'\\ 1J G- o . It L~L-l- R. 06 (Y) , (~6" 6- ft."..-oc \-\- E. b -Pl- tt N) 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 5~E- ArrA(!.,NIEI) 5. To the best.of my knowledge the statements found in this application aretr.ue and correct.. I also rrdeTsLc:llld LIJaL ante~~ GUflstllJctioTTUf the action applicable-m4hiS\7ariance request,1f--grantEm, is not Iaken within one year, the variance ex~ Ail ~/ 12, ~ ~~~r~licant By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told abQut the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. PrintName--rc.VV\ ~ ti'tAM. ~ Comment C::Jo ~orl."" tt ! Signature ~ 1:. ~~ Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature rint Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name omment Signature Address ~oo ~'(l nyfJ I)bt '-.AWe ~t'\T OC.,C .lAf>lc::P JI DA-\{~ ttLM Pr<.5PS.R:ry Address l~ ~()..N AJY~I DOE ~ bkJV\.o~ ~ ~NGG.~1-CQ.'J6 .s--rR.\.Y'IV( !\\ot:;ol o~\ - CA-S ~ \0- Add ress 7..:3 6 ~ V'f\.'^' '1rl -1 -..L"'> k-V\ . \~ ~ce t--ItJ Address Address Address LEGEND LEGEND cont'd AC Denotes air conditioner OHC Denotes overhead communication line BE Denotes building entrance OHE Denotes overhead electric line DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED CB Denotes catch basin PP Denotes power pole CS Denotes curb stop TC Denotes top of curb Lots 303 and 304, GLEN WOOD, DB Denotes decorative brick pavers WV Denotes water valve EM Denotes electric meter Hennepin County, Minnesota. r. Denotes gutter ~ GM Denotes gas meter CED Denotes Cedar tree GW Denotes guy wire TR Denotes deciduous tree MH Denotes manhole LOT CERT/RCA TE FOR: RENAISSANCE EXTERIORS LINDEN RESIDENCE NOTES: I.) Visible above ground evidence of utilities is shown hereon per field location. This survey does not purport to show any underground utilities. \ :ri v \a> CJ (127.20 N89025'//''E KEYSTONE WALL 843.5 ~ PLA T) /27./9 w a.. 0:::1") zL[') OC e::0l Cl~ )0:: 2.) Contact GOPHER ST ATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 for precise on site location of utilities prior to any excavation. LlJ <: ~ I---J 30 t840.6 -]. 840.7 I 4 30 I g40.2 \ LlJ :, 840.61 I (:) x 842 \ lD I.. It) .4\ /-"a:.~.. 8406 1 Q vI-CO .:::, l a>N't) C) I 1\ ~ .., ( "~ ~.t: ......... C R ,\..-Jo, 8<0.5 > ,~ ASS <:::::> TC ra> Cr:: I n~ ",. ~ L V I ,n A '" 8<"- - ,.... l./ 4..1'" . CS' r-.... ..... I . 0 845.5 '" ~ ~ ... !;;:.s:,mm'o.~'~n..~~.5.~:. v, I"'" r 8<'.0 _! ./ 30 ,"'" , r- " ' .1' c:;;, -] : (\. : ~ > ~.., 5 30 , : I 845.' SET IR . >"1, 8'"-' ,'- "76'" RLS IS';,"SOP I PE ' ~ J 840 0 I' <: }'j OJ ce' "^ ' ' ''-to" ~ 8"'9 .: L .8422 840.3 4-5"CED.8....' l-.,!*;CEO jlX Cf). L , ,> . 0 ' . I 'v,./' ~48.1 \ ~. .../' I ____ I "35 _ _ _ _ _ ..,.~ 1....2 B " U U I N 0 U TC . ' ____"8458 S I _____~~4.6 ---- ".." ' _____ . 0841.4 I _ _ _ x 842 3 . MH _ _ -=-- _ x 8<.1.7 ____ F840.5 -,--__ x MH _ _____ _1.I::. __ U - -e- I I I I ~ W~845'9 - a.. ",- '- a.. . -z: 845.8 Cl 0 I I.L.~ C:J / /1 T ::; /" Q L L/ / ,.... l./ ..t:- 840.8 TC ~ 3.) This survey was prepared without the benefit of current title work. Easements, appurtenances, and encumbrances may exist in addition to those shown hereon. This survey is subject to revision upon receipt of a current title insurance commitment or attorney's title opinion. ............., :>.... LlJ "'N~ ~ c:i ...::J..~ ~\ ~ ~ ~ 1:\46.0 ~ II " 845.4 x~>< ~I \ 4 FT CHAIN LINK FENCEJ C J 16.2 x 846.0 C) 8...... C) 46.3x ",,::,. >'::C::) GRA-::" '1:1- S S ----./'.....,.''<.-=.,~> ,J -< / n T ::; n ::; 8847.1...... L L/ / ,.... l./ ,.... . 42;~OAK <-'~1' pj 84;': l..1 J 846.7.-./.:~..._...-OHc-..x.--'''-''8' 479 ....~L, . -', \, i> 846'.5 846 9 '{ 27"OAK . <2" . 'It/i~,.j ~ l<: <( C) a/? C) 'tO~ . {(~_I_~N'\ x 846.2 , , I I rr j 842.6 Vi 30"oAKi>. .~ -") ---';"'-,--- ,< BE 844.1 842.4'" . 44.1 C) ~ BITUMINOUS~ ~ C::) u '1:1- ~ 844.3 842.7 tl ..-,r........"'>~ ) co"'.O . '* ":J'I:>\ ( x 845.0 BRICK WALKWA Y x 844.2 4 FT CHAIN LINK FENCE 35.8 , x 842,1 \ \ , 846.9 'x ..........J ~ 4.) Area = 10,184 Sq. Ft. or 0.234 Acres 5.) Survey coordinate basis: Assumed 6.) Benchmark: :::e :::, I-... BM#I) Double spike in the southwest side of the power pole in the alley. Elevation = 849.43 feet r ,1\ -' Cll W CL CL o zro o'<t 0:: If) ( -- t We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, from or on said land. 847.5 847.3 f Dated this 15th day of June, 2006 CONCRETE 846.8 o I") - OJ OJ I.L. o N :~N~~~22f{~Zll:~~_~~~~~~_~ 848.1 x 847.0 G Mark S. Hanson, P.L.S. Minn. Lie. No. 15480 POPLAR DRIVE W -l <r () (j') Sunde Land Surveying, LLC. 2006-119 700/47 T.29, R.24, S.19 200611900l.dwg TSS . . . 00.*' 3;f.. - Four Seasons Solar Products LtC More.. ~CO,jf, (t'!JIl' .p~ S'e.A.~o.J1l ....c . ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS t ~ MODEL WSL T -1 OBW i. - WITH 3-3/8" X 5-3/8" ROOF RAFTI!'RS A T36" ON CENTER SPACIN~ FOR THE LINDEN RESIDENCE~ LOCATED AT 303 SUNNY RIDGE LANE 1j GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 SYSTEM 9 SUN AND STAR STRAIGHT EAVE DESIGN . DATE: 4/11/2006 v ~ ::; :i r,; t:: 0 To'~ {~ E~ ~~ ~. ~. ;.~ \~~ .9; g (b ~. ~ ~ .~ ,.Sf ;," 0_~j ~-- -.. fJ :i .~~~~ . ~~~ ~ ;:;. ~.: 5~ g <5 ;:t..; ;l~~;~ .:r . v: ..,~ '-~ ~ t'Il .... ';; 'n ,,~ o ,~ lot ...- ~ (;' <: "0 2:- t,l') ;nf nJ ~ ~ -,...... ('D ..... 0 ~ "CI o _ - - o :J -' (i ~ """l~e! 0..= ~mc.g":Il ::s' :::I So '< ~ ~ f9. ~ a _. I;n = ... n :'! i 0 - 0 I III ... ~ ... . :; THE ABOVE INDICATED PROJECT HAS BEEN EXAMINED FOR 40 PSF ROOF LOAD 90 MPH EXPOSURE B '3-SEC GUST' WIND LOAD SEISMIC RESPONSE SPECTRAL ACCELERATION (S5 )=1.0g AS PER THE 2003 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (2003 IBC) AND EITHER MEETS OR EXCEEDS THESE LOADINGS NOTES: 1. THIS SUMMARY PERTAINS TO THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF OUR UNIT UP TO, BUT NOT INCLUDING, THE CONNECTIONS TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND/OR ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION. ALL SUBSTRUCTURE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND CONNECTIONS TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE FOUR SEASONS PRODUCT, AND MUST BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS 2. THE ENGINEERING DESIGN SCOPE FOR THE FOUR SEASONS PRODUCT DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR SPECIAL LOAD CONDITIONS CREATED BY ATTACHMENT TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. THESE MAY INCLUDE SNOW DRIFTING OR UNBALANCE SNOW LOADING. ANY SPECIAL LOADING CONDITIONS MUST BE EVALUATED BY OTHERS. . 5005 Veterans Memorial Highway * Holbrook, NY 11741 * Telephone(631)563-4000 * Fascimile(631)563-4010 * www.FourSeasonsSunrooms..com An Ul TRAFRAME PlC Company . . . Renaissance Exteriors,ln. 7351 Kirkwood Lane North Maple Grove, MN 55369 MN License# 20220285 Joe Lucas 612-290-7988 , Prepared - for: Ken & Kim Linden 303 Sunnyridge Lane Golden Valley, MN 55422 Res. 763-374-4691 Sunroom Specifications: Approximate Sunroom Size: Roof Glazing: Vertical Glazing: Four Seasons Sunrooms Model WSLT10GG System 9 Post & Beam Straight Eaves 5 - 36in bays long unit to be System 9 Straight eave lean-to model beams to be laminated pine, stained with finish coat for beauty and strength inte~or and exterior aluminum glazing system for beauty and a maintenance ~ extenor WI glazing system to have integral double drainage to channel any moisture outside all aluminum to be fully thermally broken to prevent cold transfer only marine grade Stainless Steel Fasteners to prevent rust and staining all glass sandwiched between EPDM gaskets to allow expansion & contraction aluminum to be finished with Bronze Baked-On enamel for long-lasting beauty all glass to be fully tempered for your security and safety 17' 6" long 13' 0 1/2" projection 9' 93/8" high code 78 high performance glazing to be CONSERVAGLASS1M (MC-16) multi-coat glazing technology, Easy-Clean II Exterior coating technology argon filled, 82% of the sun's radiant heat will be reflectedlow visible reflectivity it has an R4.0 insulation value stainless steel warm edge spacer, dual seal silicone fully tempered double insulated safety glass code 74 high performance glazing to be CONSERVAGLASS1M (MC-56) multi-coat glazing technology Easy-Clean II Exterior coating technology argon filled, 62% of the sun's radiant heat will be reflected t low visible reflectivity, it has an R4.0 insulation value stainless steel warm edge spacers for less conductivity, dual seal silicone fully tempered double insulated safety glass Home Betterment Center 7351 Kirkwood Lane N., Suite 130 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Phone: (763) 780-2000 Fax: (763) 780-2003 Ken & Kim Linden 303Sunnyridge Lane ~oldenValley, MN 55422 763-374-4691 Existing House Innovative Solutions in Home Bettennent www.homebettennent.com ""' . Cut opening beneath existing Window Header opening 6' l' 6" ( >( >~ 16' 3 1/8" T Pin to Existing // and Block / // / ,/ // Footings \ //1 20' 10~8' /// // G~~ Block ~dows / 18" x 36" / / / New Full// / Basement' / // / / / / 88" Existing Basement Old Well Room 1 . few Full Basement .. N - ~ o I (v) ~ Match Exsiting Basement Height Perimeter 8' x 20" Cont. Footing 8" Cement Block Waterproofing Exterior R-10 Insulation Board 4" Cement Slab R-10 Beneath Slab Vapor Barrier Beneath Slab Interior Drain Tile & Basket I 5' 8 1/2" sump baa I // ,,1/ /" R-10 Foamboard .. .. Landir Post Fooring For 12" Sona Tube 18" Footing Pad 42" Min. Depth Treated 6x6 Post Galv Brackets \ .. o 1 in 1 b 161..3 1/8" Sunroom Front Wall 17'6" < > Existing Foundation To Sunroom 18' t . 6' j / "" Existing Foundation to House Corner . 7'4" . Cedar Deck Landing 5 f X 6' . ~ /f"'W ~/ Existing House 1 7' 9 1/8" < 6' >< > J I !J1JL ~ ""', Floor Framing over Existing Foundation Treated Rim Joist Treated 2x8 Joists Treated 2x8 Plate tr. III I II I I I I I I New Cedar Landing & Steps Double Treated 2x8 Rim Treated 2x8 Ledger Treated 2x8 Joists Treated 2x8 Step Framing Cedar 5/4" Deckboards First Floor Framing . Ken & Kim Linden 303 Sunnyridge Lane Golden Valley, MN 2x12 Ledger 1/2" Lags 16"OC ~ LP 32 Engineered 9 1/4 Joists I I~ Joist Hangers ~ Spaced 16" O.C. LP Insulated Rim Joist Treated 2 x 10 Plate Foundation Bolts 3/4" Plywood T&G Sub-Flooring . Projection 13' 1/2" "J/ . Home Betterment Center 7351 Kirkwood,LaD.e N., Suite 130 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Phone: (763) 780-2000 Innovative Solutions in Home Bettennent Fax: (763) 780.2003 www.homebetterment.com . Mudroom Addition Hand Frame Shed Roof 2x8 Rafters 7/16" aSB sheathing ~ Ice & Dam Protection Matching Shingles R-38 Fiberglas Insulation Vapor Barrier 5/8" Sheetrock Wall Construction 2x6 Construction Dbl 9 1/4" LVL Header ~aSB Exterior Sheathing Tyvek Building paper Matching Cedar Shakes R-19 Fiberglas Insulation Vapor Barrier Sheetrock ~ Treated Floor System on top of the existing Slab of WellRoom Treated Floor Joists 3 layers of R-10 Foamboard 3/4" Plywood Sub-flooring . Existing Well Room Foundation New Full Basement Foundationl ~ 88" 7 . Ken & Kim Linden 303 Sunnyridge Lane Golden Valley, MN Grade Cedar Landing Cedar Steps Innovative Solutions in Home Betterment www.homebetterment.com . .Home Betterment Center 7351 Kirkwood Lane N., Suite 130 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Phone: (763) 780-2000 Fax: (763) 780-2003 . . . . . Ken & Kim Linden 303 Sunnyridge Lane Golden Valley, MN GRADE Innovative Solutions in Home Betterment www.homebettennent.com ;f Shed Roof Tie In Triple 1 3/4" X 15" x 17' 6" LVL Beam Hand Framed 2x8 Rafters 7/16" OSB Flat 2x6 Ledger on roof Remove 3 courses of shingles Install WR Grace Underlayment Install second layer Construct Primary Ridge Flashings Install New Shingles Insulate Cavity with R-38 Fiberglas / / / ~ ~ . Construct Side walls Construct 2x4 Side walls beneath soffit R-15 Fiberglas, vapor Barrier, Sheetrock 7/16" OSB Sheathing Install Matching Cedar Shakes Install Tyvek Building Paper / 13' 3" Construct 9 3/4" Basewall Construct 2x4 Basewall R-15 Fiberglas Vapor Barrier Sheetrock 7/16" OSB Sheathing Tyvek Building Paper Matching Cedar Shakes . Home Betterment Center 7351 Kirkwood.Lane N., Suite 130 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Phone: (763) 780-2000 Fax: (763) 780-2003 . Home Betterment Center 7351 Kirkwood Lane N., Suite 130 Maple Grove, MN 55369 . ~ _ "" _ ~~ "" _ ~ __"""""""'''''"'_ """"'(763)180-200) ~ _ "" _ ~ I III' II ' II ' II ' II ' II ~.homob<tt<nnffi'=m F= (763) 780-2OOJ . Axonometry ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 IS '0'-33/16' 0'-33/16' M ~ r3/4" 3'- 3/4" 3'- 3/4" 3'. 3/4" 3'. 3/4" - I". 110 ,. o .... Plan Four Seasons Sunrooms System 9 Pine Interior Sunroom Ken & Kim Linden Renaissance Exteriors, Inc. . . ~~III~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~" IIII ~ i 3'..C)ro sof6ro 3'..C)" ~" 3'.I(l" I '~*~ I~ ~ .~ . . I '0''''12" I L 1....,18. j I ,0''''/2" I I ..4'+ I:I.."",H,," J:..,...... 1:1.."",+;,.." Dinht 1:1.."""tinn G~S SIZES TRAPEZOID SIZES - PART PART NUt.lBER WIDE HIGH NUt.lBER SIZE CHART " 861 86" 80" Z-1 8-1/4" :J: 86" :J: 12 1/4" 86" 60-5/8" 12-3/4" iJt: 36" iJt: 21-8/4" UNrr SPACE AT 86J z-z WIDTH GABLE END 86K 86" 50-1/2" Z-8 Z2 8/S" iJt: 86" iJt: 81-1/4" 3' 0' 86L 36" 41-1/4" Z-4 81-7/8" iJt: 86" iJt: 40-7/8" 6' 3/B' 861/ 86" 81-1/8" 10' 13/16" 13' 1 3/4' SYSTEM J J 9 GLAZING Jt.lIN' 19 3/4" BASEWAI.l. ..... """"" "" . """"" '"'" Home Betterment Center 7351 Kirkwood.Lane N., Suite 130 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Phone: (763) 780-2000 Fax: (763) 780-2003 Innovative Solutions in Home Betterment www.homebettennent.com GLASS SIZES FOR CURRENT SYSTEM 9 OPTIONS I DESCRIPTION ITHICKNESsl SIZE I ALUM I NUM AIINING 3/4' II I NDOIIS 16 3/4' 9 1/2' x 24 5/16' 32 (BII) 3/4' 24 7/S' x 24 15/16' 2 x 3 SUB SILL 47 (GG) 3/4' 40 5/16' x 24 15/16' (BY OTHERS) ALUMINUM t SLIDING 314' IIINDOIIS 32 (BII) 3/4' 26 3/S' x 2S 114' * 47 (GG) 3/4' 41 3/4' x 2S 1/4' * ..... x ALUMINUM " W SLIDING :c DOORS :2 5 FT IIIDE 3/4' 2S' x 75' ** 8 6 FT IIIDE 3/4' 34' x 75' ** '" z ALUM I NUM ::> 1I1 COMMERCI AL ~ DOORS 3D' IIIDE I' 24 5/16' x 71 5/16' 36' IIIDE I' 31 5/16' x 70 15/16' e; 59' IIIDE I' 23 112' x 70 15/16' PATTERNS * * OLD THICKNESS liAS s/S'. NEll 3/4' THICKNESS FITS IN SAME FRAME JUST CHANGE THE MARINE GASKETS. NEll GASKETS PIN DRKGLBD3-4 5 FT IIIDE DOORS. DRK6GLBD3-4 6FT III DE DOORS. (2 REQUIRED FOR EACH DOOR) GASKETS FOR SINGLE GLAZED SLIDERS PIN DRKGLBDI2s. 6 REQUIRED PER 5 FT. OR 6 FT, DOORS. * NEll 28 1/4' IIIDE GLASS FOR IIINDOIIS IIITH EQUAL GLASS PANELS. OLD IIIDTHS IIERE 27 3/4' SLIDING SIDE & 2S 3/4' FIXED SIDE. (1IINDOIIS IIITH NEll SIZE GLASS BEGAN SHIPPING AUGUST 1992) "- EXTERIOR J RNISH GABLE ~HING IRK4s6891 ~ ii: :2 8 '" z ::> 1I1 7/B" INSULATED GlASS SILL ~HING ~" FROi'IT SILL TRIt.l 3/4 x 3 3/S" ClEAR *~ FROi'IT BEAM SHOE rnrn t.lOLOING l.At.IlNATED GABLE t.lUWON *~ 7/S" INSULATED GlASS 1 I I #10-24 x 3/4" PP t.lS NS ~ GABLE MUNTIN TRIM~* - GROSS MUNTIN 1M GlAZING TAPE IHK10091 GlAZING CAP ~ GABLE CROSS MUNTIN DETAIL "E l.At.IlNATED GABLE MUWON *~ r 7/S' INSULATED GlASS -~~ ('l II II II II II EPOt.l INSERT IRK5RII ^ , I , I GABLE SILL ~ #10 x 5/B" PP t.lS NS IHN20251 SAt.lE AS FROi'IT (IN SILL TRIt.l) FRONT SILL ~ CAULKING " L FASTENER (BY OTHERS) 1 1/2 RING SHANK NAlL...J SHAI.l. BE FLUSH WffH 12" O.C. ~ TOP OF 2 x 4 l- OVERALL SUNROOt.l WIDTH-J'--/ +0" FOUNDATION WIDTH -3/S" N FRONT SILL DETAIL HC" #14 x 1 1/4" PP t.lS NS Effi2miI (2 AT EACH SIDE OF BEAM SHOE) REFER TO COVER SHEET FOR MEMBER DESIGNATIONS SElTlNG BLOCKS IHK10231 ~ TAPE ~ (TYP) I _J. - OVERAll SUNROOM LENGTH ---J .--,- +0" H FOUNDATION LENGTH -3/S" ~~L~ SILL DETAIL HDH I hereby certify thaM " pI n. 5peclfr- cation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct superv~sion aDd that f am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the law:; of the SLQte of Minnesota. Date REVISION lEY CD.... .............. '" - 0- CD'" \I \I g~ ~ ~ Cf.l ~ 0 0 U 0 Q:; z U) ~. Cf.l ~ Cf.l U z ~ :>< 0 Cf.l ~ -< ~ ..... r"'l = """ Cf.l 0 ~ l'- - ..... Q:; ~ = ..... ~ ~ ....:l . 0 =s ::.:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 < :::!1 Ii=: Cf.l l""l ~ :::!1 l""l 0 Cf.l Z W. ~ :i u o -< ifl l""l o ~ Eo< ~ ~ Z ~ e3 ~ 0 o ~ It':I == U) 0 ~ < 0 ~ It':I ~ Cf.l U) Q:; r"'l Z ~ c.!:l ..... ~ Cf.l r"'l 0 ~ ~ ~ O~ - REVIEWED BY: LD CHECKED BY GP DATE 12-06-02 DWG # SYS9-1 PAGE 1 OF 2 1l~"\Il\l \l 1\\15 p.)IC~ fRO ~ 0\51 \l\l~ \ _C~CSS SASH MUWON ~ r~ \ I \ CAVE H~ I2Q!J '\ I I \ 1. 3/B" '\ 33/B" -\j " ~~ ::,...... ...:: I I in'io U II ~e> "'e> l~ *~RooF BEAM ~FR * ~ ONT BEAM #10 . 1 1/4" PP SM NS IHN20301 2 PER BEAM) SUPPORT TO BE DESIGNEO BY OTHERS H OVERALL SUNRooM WIOTH -l ATTACH SOLAAIUM TO DETAIL "s" RIDGE r:P~'rT.WITH 1/4 x 3" 1/2 x 9" HX LG GV IHN21121 DETAIL "A" EAVE .Home Betterment Center 7351 Kirkwood Lane N., Suite 130 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Phone: (763) 780-2000 Fax: (763) 780-2003 Innovative Solutions in Home Betterment www.homebetterment.com ~1;'TEO ROOF BEAM DETAIL " I " GABLE MULLION * MOLDING:::----...... ~ (BY OTHERS) ~ I '.--^v GABLE MUWON s~~ C. GLAZING CORD ~ ~ 30 '" 0 0 GLAZING CI>F '" z ~ ::> III BCAUlY CI>F ~ ~ ~ 5: (4) #10 . 5/B" PP SM NS ~ 3" ! I4JI .L-- MUWON STRAP IT f--I ICN61041 ${ JL Ii IA Jy- I I r- I I I f I I I I ~ I hn . lr' GAB: :Wg~~ ... ~ ~ -11 11~16"~ lAMINATED GABLE MUWON #14. 1 1/4" I * 16PGMI PP SM NS IHN}V51 DETAIL "J" MULLION & ROOF CONNECTIO 2 x 3 SUS SILL *FRO~ ~(BY OTHERS) .. 1I4.x 6" LAG ! 16" O.C. INTO ADEQUATE FRONT BtAN SHOE STRUCTURAL COLUHNS ~ SUPPLIED BY OTHERS 11$-1 . I /I h fa:: VGABLE SILL- .~ T \ I~J- ..;--.J> ~~ #10 x 2 1/2" rp SM2~S HN20 e ~SILL FLASHIN7 . GLAZING g,..J~. . F"" w '-." , '1'- IIDJ """" 7/B" PP SM NS PP SM NS FRONT Sill SEAUTY CI>F TYP ~ ~ mID ~ . 33/16" - 37 3/4" C.C. lY.P. OVERALL SUNRooM LENGTH If - .J>R F. .J> .J> I~ t-----W-7/B" INSULATED ~~ GLASS c..i ~ o .... FLASHING ~ ~ lillI ::,. ~ "'z 7 /S" INSULATED "'I ::> V'lf I GLASS t;:; r-- #10 . 2 1/2" PP MS NS IHN2027I . <0 I r- CORNER CAP ;;;. ?' ~ .., r- SILL END PLATE 1EEIEI ""-- CORNER PLATE ~ "H" RIGHT CORNER DETAIl heiCby certify that this plan. !;pecifi- ~..tion. or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision aud that I am · duly Registered Professional Engineer un er the Jaw,", of the ~ate of Minnesota. r-:-r-- _ '11 Lawrence Fischer DETAIL "G" FRONT BEAM AT WALL Date .fl.1~Reg.jstr8tion No. ""t '3.7/'], ,.. O-i ~ (J) ~ 0 0 U 0 ~ z '(f) ;:::l (J) ~ (J) U z ~ ~ 0 (J) < 0 I!= - (::l;:l :::t:: '<l' (J) 0 ~ l:"- - - ~ ~ :::t:: - ;:::l O-i ~ . 0 ~ l'o.. ~ ~ l'o.. ~ 0 ~ 0 < ~ I!= (J) (::l;:l ~ ~ r:::I r:::I 0 tf.l Z '(f) Z ~. < ~ o ~ '(f) r:::I o ;:::l e.. ~ ~ Z (::l;:l > 0 U':l :::t:: '(f) 0 Q < 0 z U':l < ~ (J) '(f) Q::; (::l;:l z ~ ~ - ~ (J) r:::I 0 Q ~ ~ O~ REVIEWED BY: LD CHECKED BY GP DATE 12-06-02 DWG # SYS9-2 PAGE 2 OF 2 , . 06-07-14 341 Westwood Drive N. . Robert Allen Olson . . . . lIey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 25, 2006 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Kristin A Gonzalez, Planning Intern Subject: 341 Westwood Drive N. Robert Allen Olson, Applicant Robert Allen Olson owns the home and property at 341 Westwood Drive N. The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1), Front Yard Setback requirements, in order to construct a new garage addition. The proposed addition will bring it to within 26.5 feet of the property line along Beverly Avenue. A survey was required to obtain information regarding the existing structures on the property. The applicant is planning to add on to an existing garage in the location where a carport was formerly located but was destroyed by a fire. It will use the existing footings. The carport was constructed into the front setback area without a variance or building permit. The applicant states that the hardship is the topography of the lot and this is the best location for the garage with the layout of the existing home and the topography. The project requires the following variances from the following City Code: Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1), Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the required minimum front setback shall be 35 feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. The requested variance is for 8.5 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 26.5 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Beverly Avenue for the addition. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1949. In 1973, the owner constructed a deck and then in 1976, a porch was added to the home. No other major additions have been made to the house since that time. ~~J ~ 28 HIGHWAY S!$ HIGHWAY 55 520 520 520 ,$36 535 512 z ! i i ... 1m $28- '524- no- sll- Sl~ SOl 500 521 S09 500 4100 SOl 500- 4100 DR 4~1: PLM" 412S 421S 124 21S 100 1. 20S 3I!a11 145 . . . City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address of property involved in this application: "_ 341 Westwood Drive North 2. APPlicant:.Ji(J~fPhi A'//cp? 0/S'07 Name (temporary) 2900 Thomas Ave So # 1928 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Address City/State/Zip 763-528-0510 Cell Phone Business Phone 612-920-0282 Home Phone f<.. 0 I ~ 0 () I J.. 1) ~ a.. 0 (~ CO rY\ Email Address 4. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. This is a reconstruction of a home damaged by fire. The alteration to the previous structure is to include an enclosed garage area in place of a carport. The carport was built 30 years ago, and adjoined the home. The home was built in 1949. The existing tuck-under 2 car garage is small by today's standards. The proposed enclosed garage area will not take require any more additional space than the previous carport. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. ,- The property is situated at the top of a steep hill. The grade of the hill makes winter driving very difficult. The property slope is such that location of the garage area is limited to the area requested. The property's steep front hill necessitated that the elderly and handicapped relatives of the property owner use the side entrance. The design enhances the property and the quality look of the homes in the neighborhood. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, Is not taken within one year, the variance e~ C( Signature of Applicant 5. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other atements regarding the project. Print Name tlhJd ~ Print Name '"bay ~ J/lI\ ( (, ~h ~~/J Comment -h/.-e:: VJi~ us .-h-, do. ~ Signature ~~ 714 tJltL.. Pr."nt Name &!c, VC,,)L', f/:', II /7, I I V ~ _ ~_ IV c:A-j e~ ,hf7 /~ Comment Signature Commenr Signature /}1l~ Address h~ Y;~.7K @t ~v ' -<., I v~ ~ .>!'"tt --- C;;~^j~ ;reV.;) d CVD--(j~ Address LfJ~ lJ-kstWo&1J Dy ~ c; 0 lele,.. ~ I /~YI YL1rJ 5 S' Address ,3.J/ U).eg~",.,~Ce Ll ..'. 'J' C7)~/~ V~/(f11 / ~ GSnL ~/ ~ / " eint Narrie-(;!e2leJ1 "Saj/ rJ! Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature /Ii)~ Address3#7 uettplA- ft/n 6 ~6 .2..2--'"' -~_~ ~e~A~ Address Print Name .DYU('Q./ cU/lrl '~VI()L lttArfWlS Comment d- a tt~p.t5 Signature ~nt Name ~mment Signature Address 3 ~ vJ e <::. t u.J 0 nd 1\ {'. ^)n Vti) MP.... V fA- ~ A. VI T - Po r 5lL [ e.., f)V U I Je...o..-r Address ~J.t, \AJp<.twonA lJv. No . The attached documents indicate dates that construction work was completed at 341 Westwood Drive North. A permit was issued for work on the porch. As the work for the carport was done at the same time, we are not sure whether a permit was required at the time. We do not have access to records of set-backs at the time, or records of building requirements. It seems reasonable that since one permit was requested, the other was not needed. As the porch area was inspected, work on the carport area was being completed. . . . ROOFING AND snEET MEtAL ttlNfRAUOR$ c/t#~ A'. DALSIN ~ .r'on INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL ROOFING CO~JSUlTMns MIIINnrlMJU PROGRMA MEMBRANE WATERP~r;fJFlrIG STEEl ROOF OECKING RUSSELL O. DALSIN . R.OBER.'r M. DALSIN 1"" \JV4Ic1.;! ;lU.~~ \ fl,;;\ I;', ...." . - -:..... 7471 BL99MllltTOfHlffiHH MI1I1I[Af6L1J, MINH. :iH04 NEW ADDRESS: 2830 ~ 20th A VENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55407 . . PHON E 729-9334 May .4, 1976 Dr. & Mrs."Robert A. Olson 341 Westwood Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 Re: Carport IS' x 20'S" and 9' 0" Breeze\'lay Addition 341 Westwood Drive Dear Mr. & Mrs. Olson: We propose to furnish necessary labor, material, and equipm~nt required to do the following roofing and roof insulation and sheet metal work on the above building: BREEZEWAY ROOF ADDITION ONLY 1. Remove the gravel surfacing along roof edge for roofing connection. 2. Apply two layers of ~" rigid board roof insulation nailed over wood deck. Offset joints of second layer with those of first layer. CARPORT ROOF ADDITION ONLY 1. Seal joints in plywood deck with emulsified asphalt plastic cement and felt. 2. Install insulation cant strip at walls. BOTH AREAS 1. Apply over insulation or plywood deck,,, four layers of 15 lb. per- forated asphalt felt set in solid, approxi~ately 23 lb. moppings of dead level asphalt. Gravel in with approximately 60 lbs. of dead level asphalt. 2. Make roofing connection to scupper through roof edge cant on carport roof. 3. Apply felt base flashing at the roof edge cant and at wall. SHEET METAL WORK r:--Install 24 gauge galvanized iron cap flashing and fascia at roof edge cant. 2. Install 24 gauge galvanized iron counterflashing at wall. 3. Install new 24 gauge galvanized iron scupper through roof edge cant at carport roof. See FOllowing Page . . . BUILDING DEPT. ....",_. VILLl.'GE OF GOLDEN VALLEY -':",.;",",,- "~";,..1> DATE ft~;;r! S--:4./ l!A A- OTHER DESCRIPTIONS AMOUNT BUILDING PLUMBING HEATING SEWER SCAVENGER WELL GAS PIPING SIGN WATER METER YOKE "0" RING LANDFILL & EXCAVATION ST ATE SURCHARGE 4% SALES TX. No. REC'D BY COIlTROLf"ORMSC:ORP., MINNEAPOLIS. MIN. . . . Dr. & Mrs. Robert A. O~soh 2 May 4, 1976 We will do all the work for the net sum of One Thousand Seven Hundred Three Dollars ($1,703.00). WLS/lb Accepted By Date Yours very truly, John A. DALSIN and Son 0-. w. L. Sherard . . . z o ~ ~ w t; ~ !Z9 od cei!t u.~ r / / / / / / / / / / / / / / f', / / / / / l.., . . . . Established in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER TIlE LAWS OFSTATE OF MINNESOTA INVOICE NO. F.S.NO. SCALE: 1" = 74812 1026-43 3D' 7601 73rd Avenue North Minnea.polis, MinnesotR 55428 (763) 560-3093 Fax No. (763)560-3522 . Denotes Found Iron Monument o Denotes Iron Monument o Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing,Elevation ~ Denotes PropOl;~d Elevation .. Denotes Surface!Drainage NOTE: Proposed gmdes arE! subject to results of soil tests. Proposed bUildin~' information must be checked with approved bu Iding plar. and development or gmding plan bef ,re excavation and construction. Proposed gmdesi shown on this survey are interpolations of ~roposed contours from the drainage, gmding and/or development plans. Proposed Top of !3'ock Proposed Gamgl;j Floor Proposed Lowest, Floor Type of Building ~urlt ey nrz QJertifir-ate ROBERT OLSON Property located in Section 19, Township 29, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota ,/ ///// ///'/'/// <<"""""""""" '" ""'"",..' ""0/ t'~/) b <:9" ~ /6' 6' '/ ""'",." .,",.."" Lot 12 and that pm of l.ot l11ying Northeasterly of a s~:>""'" line drawn from a point midway in the front or Southeasterly 'v' line of said lot to a point midway in the rear or Northwesterly line of said Lot 11, Block 8 "GLENDALE" Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1><'0 '00' \ ,\~ \ ":)0 :00\ <Q'0 ~ ~ ~ .:1:. ~ ~ <:- ~ fJ ~~ \) / / / / / / / / 00. ~~O ~fJf/; The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 12th day of July 2006. C2~ 1 ClQ~_f Rev Dmwn By :J. .M.Uff//O..A>'n Signed File Name gd-11-12-8fb102643inv74812.dwg Charles F. Anderson, Minn, Reg. No. 21753 or Gregory R. Pmsch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 . . " ' . 06-07 -15 3225 Lee Avenue N. . Betty McCool . . Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 25, 2006 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Kristin A Gonzalez, Planning Intern Subject: 3225 Lee Avenue N Robert Allen Olson, Applicant Betty McCool owns the home and property at 3225 Lee Avenue N. The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 11.21 Subd. 11 (A)(2) Accessory Structure Front Yard Setback requirements, in order to construct a new garage addition. The proposed addition will bring it to within 15.40 feet of the property line along Adell Ave. N. A survey was required to obtain information regarding the existing structures on the property. . The applicants are planning to construct a detached garage on the rear of the home. This new structure will be 24 ft. x 24 ft. The applicant states that the hardship is fact that it is a corner lot. This causes problems with the setbacks. The project requires the following variance from the following City Code: Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(2), Accessory Structure Front Yard Setback. City Code states that accessory structures shall be located no less than 35 feet from the front property line along a street right-of-way line. The requested variance is for 19.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 15.40 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Adell Ave. for the addition. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1952. A second story was added in 1963. No other major additions have been made to the house since that time. . 33n 4700 33ftDAW N 4701 .3249 3245 3241 3US 4700 LOWRY TIlt 3ut 3US 3U11 3m TRITON D1t ~ 33a .3327 3n4 3321 3316 3317 33U .3313 3308 3309 4610 3301 ADELLAW N 4620 322lI 3216 3200 3126 z ~ ~ i 31m 3114 310ll 3026 M"~e~~~flN~$.. C~~{CH.OOtsGts3))5 . 3326 :nn m2 :n:n 3314 :n32 U28 :n8' .ma 3327 3326 3324 3316 3323 332S :n:m :n:m 3311 33Oi' z !: "I: ~ 3310 :DOG 4300 nn 3US .n38 :r.uo 4301 ans ua n3Q 32:15 3216 3218 3215 3215 un not 3201 3200 3201 3201 3lOlI m5 3135 .nu 3135 3135 3124 31H 3124 31H 3114 3115 311" 3115 3100 3101 3100 31m. 31148 3049 3llG 3049 3035 3437 3126 3US 3UO 31H 3115 3114 \~._.... , . . ~~ Gt.2-2~7-.2rS-~. . City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: BZA Meeting Date Amount R~ceived 1. Street address of property involved in this application: 3;JJls ~U- AvL- ~. 2. Applicant: BE1f1 '7I(!~tx::- Name 3us LEE ~LJ0. ~/D&J V~ SS-Yu- Address /J_ /.) ,L City/State/Zip r(.xr{ f1D'lUtE ~w.v~ 7&3 -t.f382-9o() ~~~ (;,12-- 2-t/7-z.eSf. Business Phone Home Phone Cell Phone Email Address 3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. 2'1 J( 24 h.. ",.d. 0 {] II(j ~ o,J RIiM- t:J f J.hd1t; 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. C'oJ!NU 1.-07" ;6.vi(j ~,4 f""t/@ Jl'/Ero(j 3s . fiilcl of w^-(:5t:r ~ !hI:. 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this a ue and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action . a Ie to this variance req t, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance e . s. 6. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application"please name the owner of this property: . '6 8<?~ffy L. MC~a/ Print Name of owner ~a-1i~ Signature of wner Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. ~ A brief statement of the hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance th.at may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. L Variance application fee, as follows: $125 - single family residential; $225 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of ny possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ceiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told aboyt the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other tatements regarding the project. Sht:~ \ KI d v'lCLVt- Signature ~ ~jlYJlb Address3"LJ5 Lee Ave No Print Name ~ {~ fl. ~~. ifr;es ~~f( Print Name Comment Comment Signature ~ ~j~p Address -W~ Le." ,,/ve. II. Print Name E I J' z ;r b15 tf; rE f p f(.SO/J Comment Signature &~a&t{~ ~ Address 3J3o frlr ~N, rint Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name omment Signature Address . CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY . FOR: BETTY L MCCOOL 3225 LEE AVE. NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 ~ EI. 899.05 TOP OF NUT OF HYDRANT AT SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF INT. MAJOR AVE. N. ADELL AVE. N. . .LlGElm . DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENTS o DENOTES SET IRON MONUMENTS X 999,99 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION o e - ~,.~,. ,i~.,'OS: 'II.., ~.,.,.... ':$.........1 .... ...< ~) DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE -Cl-DENOTES WOODEN FENCE '"D...J DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE @ DENOTES STORM MANHOLE ~ DENOTES WATER HYDRANT I DENOTES CATCH BASIN x:x DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES BUSH DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE NOTE * ALL LOT LINE BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED * CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY PROPOSED ELEVATIONS * NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED ON THIS LOT BY THE SURVEYOR Lots 1. Block 8, NOBLE GROVE, Hennepin County, Minnesota ~ . I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om 0 duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the Lows of the State of Minnesota Vka~f S~\/'L/JIU< Doted: 1-112/ ()(; Vladimir Sivriver MN Reg. No. 25105 ~ ---- \',._.-.--;-,-----,---.895.{jil-~--.--..--...-.----'-\ ""'- .,)' I A l A \~ f./fJ}_.o~_";",,, Q ~ ci:l (]\ -.D co > DELL~AVE. N. o CD r' < J ~, .. 'if.! (~}\J ",0,') ~"" i' ,I< SCALE 1"=30' ,I<<?' -----896,00 EXISllNG ATTACHED GARAGE 4.75 o o iii 2 EXISllNG HOUSE JA..t ..... ..... \~. . . . ~ #' 60. ~q1) ~' A"" ~ A"''!1' 6480Wayza.ta,B01l1evardiiMinneapo1i~~ lMN,.5542tJ;.1710 ~..J?,tl.(trle: KZ?~d?45~,~$09 ,. ..... E-ril:,-*hl~~(~~dsltLtiC0h1. .~~..Fax: (J6~J545,.;?801 WebSite:1!!ip:/edsmnf~&W:.!' l~N'C-kINFJ.~~I~IN(I~ . IlEs....:t <:;;N. &: . ISl] l:::'~YJjJYING :~~~~Wt.~__~n~cr.lll~~~_~~ror.&Mrd'_'~'\lij:_r~.I~~i~fmrn~~rlW:.'Tr~~rlr~mitJr.1;..-i -~i;l. -i.l~f-rifrr~.