Loading...
11-28-06 BZA Agenda e e e Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 28, 2006 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - October 24, 2006 II. The Petitions are: 101 Lawn Terrace (06-11-24) Golden Home Builders. Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Setback Requirements . .6 ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 11.9 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance. 2510 Mendelssohn Avenue Verizon Wireless, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.30, Subd. 6(B)(3) Side Yard Setback Requirements . 7 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 13 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new duct arcade. 8815 23rd Avenue North Eva Neubeck and Lorelei Lussier. Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(1) Accessory Structure Location Requirements . The proposed swimming pool would not be located completely . to the rear of the principal structure Purpose: To allow for the construction of a swimming pool. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd.11(A)(2) Front Yard Setback e Requirements . 7 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 28 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a swimming pool. Request: Waiver from Section 11.72, Subd. 3(A)(1) Fence Height Requirements . 1 ft. higher than the allowed 4ft. to a height of 5 ft. in the front yard along the (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the required 5 ft. high fence around the proposed swimming pool. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd.10(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 5 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 30 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line. e Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new porch addition III. Other Business IV. Adjournment e 2 , Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2006 . A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, October 24,2006 in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Boudreau-Landis called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Members Boudreau-Landis, Nederveld, and Weisberg and Planning Commission Representative Cera. Also present were Director of Planning and Development Mark Grimes, Planning Intern Bryan Gadow and Adminis. ssistant Lisa Wittman. Members Morrissey and Sell were absent. I. Approval of Minutes - September 26, 2006 6731 Golden Valley Road (06-09-18) (c Golden Valle Historical Socie . Ii MOVED by Nederveld, seconded by Weisberg and motion approve the minutes from September 26,2006 as submitted. II. The Petitions are: Request: . ft. to a distance of 27 ft. at its closest st) property line. Purpose: Request: Section 11.46, Subd. 7 Yard Requirements e required 50 ft. to a distance of 42.8 ft. at its closest int to the side yard (east) property line. ow for a building addition. Waiver from Section 11.46, Subd. 7 Yard Requirements . 2 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 23 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for a parking lot addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Subd. 8 Yard Requirements '. . 35 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 0 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (north) property line. Purpose: To allow for a parking lot addition. ~ Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2006 Page 2 . Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Subd. 8 Yard Requirements . 35 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 0 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (north) property line. Purpose: To bring the existing parking lot into conformance. Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Subd. 8 Front Yard Requirements Purpose: . 10ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 2 point to the front yard (north) property line. Purpose: To bring the existing building into confor Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Subd. 7 Y . 19 ft. off the required 50 ft point to the side yard (w . Grimes reminded the Board that these of Zoning Appeals meeting in orde variances requested or to justify requests from last month but th explains their variance req ere tabled at the last Board nt to either minimize the e applicant is not changing any of their new drawings and a letter that better Elena Peltsman, A TS&R, reviewed and analy th showed the Board a buildable area for project, stated that they have carefully tions that the Board made at their last meeting. She 'lIustrated the required setback areas and the that the existing building is non-conforming. Peltsman f the suggestions the Board made last month was to try to align th ition on the west side of the property with the existing building. ge tion was to add 3 feet along the rear of the proposed addition (t e sout iminate the variance request of the building addition to the west. She . this ul not gain them enough space. She explained that they need the protru d the west because that area is for a work room that needs to be located n the museum space. She added that both the neighbors to the east and west have no concerns about the proposed addition. . Peltsman showed the Board a drawing of the proposed floor plan and explained that they are trying to blend in with and compliment the existing church. She stated that the lower level is currently not accessible and in order to make it accessible they need room for stairs and a ramp. She added that the way it has been designed has the most simple and clear circulation plan and it only has the bare minimums the Historical Society needs. , . . . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24,2006 Page 3 She explained that they did look at trying to move the proposed new addition away from the west property line and pushing the south back 3 more feet to the rear, but it just won't work that way. Cera asked if the proposed display area for the antique fire truck or police car on the east side could be reduced. Peltsman said there may be some flexibility to do that, but they need the clearance area around the fire truck and police car that will be housed there. Cera clarified that there were no adjustments made from the applican Peltsman said they were trying to be reasonable but adding on 3 fe doesn't help them at all and they've looked at every possibility. Boudreau-Landis referred to the proposed work room on th far it would extend Out from the existing building. Peltsman s west side would extend out approximately 4 feet from e exi Cera asked about the parking requirements. Gri museums are one space per 400 square feet of case they do meet that requirement. g requirements for 14 spaces. In this Boudreau-Landis opened the public h Don Anderson, 3030 Scott Aven Society, gave a brief history of t profit, public sanctioned mu discussed the various im and said they are ready look favorably on th 'r r ary reasurer for the Historical I 'ety. He stated that they are a non- e bee collecting archives for many years. He have made to their building over the years the lower level and he hopes the Board will other cultural institutions are in Golden Valley. the surrounding communities have active museums. else wishing to comment, Boudreau-Landis closed the t there is the concern regarding the hardship with the property, but plicant has presented constitutes just the bare necessities that the Historic ty needs. He noted that it is a unique structure and it currently exists almost completely in the required setback areas. He added that any type of addition would not be possible without variances. Weisberg agreed and stated that seeing the floor plan and layout helped and the hardship is the goal of trying to shelter the two public safety vehicles. He said he is least comfortable with the variance requests relating to the parking lot and the proposed addition on the west side, but he realizes that the proposed addition only extends four feet beyond the existing building so it feels less enormous. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24,2006 Page 4 . Boudreau-Landis also agreed and added that it is a very unique site and that the Historical Society serves an important purpose and is an opportunity for Golden Valley. Cera said he feels a bit different than the other Board members and that there is a need to have a strict interpretation of a hardship. He said he is comfortable with the variance requests regarding the parking because they need the parking, but he felt there was an opportunity for the applicant to come back to Board with some changes to their plans and none were made. He said he is comfortable with 5 out of the 7 variance requests and asked if they could be voted on separately~ . 35 ft. off the required (north) property s closest point to the side yard n. Nederveld recalled that at the last BZA meeting the applicants had st couldn't have all of the variances, they didn't want any of them, be a wouldn't work. MOVED by Weisberg, seconded by Nederveld and motion following variancefequests. Member Cera voted no. . 23 ft. off the required 50 ft. to a distance of 27 ft. a (west) property line to allow for a building ad . . 7.2 ft. off the required 50 ft. to a distance of yard (east) property line to allow for a . 2 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a di (east) property line to allow fo . 35 ft. off the required 35 (north) property line to ce of . at its closest point to the front yard ing lot addition. distance of 0 ft. at its closest point to the front yard e existing parking lot into conformance. . a distance of 25 ft. at its closest point to the front yard ing the existing building into conformance. o ft. to a distance of 31 ft. at its closest point to the side yard 'ne to bring the existing building into conformance. rado Avenue (06-10-22) WCL Associates, Inc., Applicant Building Setback Variances: Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(3) Yard Requirements . . 15 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 5 ft. at the building's closest point to the side yard (north) property line. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2006 Page 5 . Purpose: To bring the existing buildrng into conformance. Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(3) Yard Requirements . 15 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 5 ft. at the building's closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Purpose: To bring the existing building into conformance. . Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(3) Yar . 15 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distanc closest point to the rear yard (west) pr ing's Purpose: To bring the existing building into confor Parking Lot Variances: Request: Waiver from Section 11.3 . nce of 0 ft. of parking lot ront yard (east) property line. Purpose: Request: n 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(4) Yard Requirements required 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. of parking lot closest point to the side (south) yard property line. existing parking lot into conformance from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(4) Yard Requirements . 3 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 7 ft. of parking lot area at its closest point to the side (north) yard property line. To bring the existing parking lot into conformance Landscaping Variances: Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(4) Yard Requirements . . 35 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 0 ft. of landscaping at its closest point to the front (east) property line. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2006 Page 6 . Purpose: To reconstruct the parking" lot Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(4) Yard Requirements . 5 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. of landscaping at its closest point to the side (north) property line. . Purpose: To bring the existing landscaping into conformance. . Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(4) Yar . 5 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance its closest point to the side (south) p ng at Purpose: To bring the existing landscaping into co Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, . 5 ft. off the required 10 its closest point t e of 5 ft. of landscaping at pertY line. Request: Waiver fro ;dtiiJj,!nto conformance. Subd. 6(C)(4) Yard Requirements Purpose: . ed 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. of landscaping at the side (south) property line. Purpose: Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(4) Yard Requirements . off the required 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. of landscaping at s closest point to the side (north) property line. To reconstruct the parking lot. . Gadow e ed that the applicant is in the process of acquiring the property at 900 Colorado Ave. and would like to bring the building into conformance with the setback requirements. He explained that he broke the requested variances into three groups, building, parking lot and landscaping. He added that the current landscaping is poor and not well maintained and that the applicant has plans to add landscaping to the site. Grimes added that the applicant's proposal does meet the parking requirements. Gadow agreed and explained that they are proposing to add 7 parking spaces inside the building and 33 parking spaces in the proposed new parking lot. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24,2006 Page 7 . Cera clarified that the applicant could have asked for a variance from the number of required parking spaces which would have allowed for more landscaped area. Grimes agreed and explained that this building is going to be used as office space so he thinks it is important for the applicant to have enough parking spaces. Grimes explained that this property is in the 1-394 Corridor study area and that the City is encouraging the upgrading of properties in this area to be more consistent with the goals of the Corridor Study. Clark referred to a site plan with upgraded landscapi property is parking lot fr proposal could mee he could be used for 0 Clark agreed. rties Weisberg asked if this proposal is consistent with what the City expec Corridor plan. Grimes explained that the 1-394 Corridor Study will b Mixed Use properties. He stated that it is not the intent to kick a current location, but if they are going to remain the City would upgraded. . Dave Clark, WCL Architects, Applicant, stated that he least 10 years. He stated that they are currently locat are being evicted from their building because of area. He stated that the building at 900 Colorad any of the zoning ordinances and it encroaches that currently the property is used as a w building and they need the parking in t move into the building right now but' h anything, he would need a varian uilding for at is P and that they proposal in that uilt i 959. It doesn't meet e property lines. He said ould like it to be an office y. He stated that he could -l'~;;~ a tree, or curb and gutter or at he ould like to build a first rate building nd a patio in the front. He said currently the i property line. Grimes clarified that if the t setback requirements then only half of the space her half would have to be used for warehouse space. e curb along Colorado Ave. would be from the proposed d approximately 25 feet. Cera asked the applicant if he ulevard area. Clark said yes. Grimes told the applicant that he t-of-Way permit in order to plant in the boulevard area. Grim d that the history in this area is that there were no setback require nd that virtually every building in the 1-394 Corridor is non-conforming today and it is a dilemma throughout the Corridor. Weisberg clarified that there are 12 variances requested and only 3 of them are for something other than bringing the existing building and parking lot into conformance. . Boudreau-Landis opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Boudreau-Landis closed the public hearing. . . . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2006 Page 8 Weisberg said his biggest concern is if this proposal will set this property up to not be at home in a mixed use environment down the road and if the property owner will have to make changes down the road in order to fit in with the rest of the properties in the Corridor area. Grimes explained that the 1-394 Corridor zoning ordinance has not yet been adopted. The property is currently zoned Industrial and the City Council has no plans to do a re-development district in this area. Cera stated that the existing conditions of the property are the obvious hardships in this case. Nederveld agreed and added that none of the variances being re dare making the setback situation any worse than it has been for decades. MOVED by Nederveld, seconded by Boudreau-Landis and moti to approve the following variance requests: usly Building Setback Variances: . 15 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 5 ft. a side yard (north) property line to bring the exi . 15 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance side yard (south) property line to brin ing's closest point to the into conformance. . 15 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a rear yard (west) property line. e building's closest point to the ing building into conformance Parking Lot Variances: . 35 ft. off the required to the front yard t) dis a of 0 ft. of parking lot area at its closest point line to bring the existing parking lot into conformance. . istance of 5 ft. of parking lot area at its closest point property line to bring the existing parking lot into . d 10ft. to a distance of 7 ft. of parking lot area at its closest point yard property line to bring the existing parking lot into conformance . 35 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 0 ft. of landscaping at its closest point to the front (east) property line to reconstruct the parking lot . 5 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. of landscaping at its closest point to the side (north) property line to bring the existing landscaping into conformance. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2006 Page 9 . . 5 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. of landscaping at its closest point to the side (south) property line to bring the existing landscaping into conformance. . 5 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. of landscaping at its closest point to the side (west) property line to bring the existing landscaping into conformance. . 5 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. of landscaping at its closest point to the side (south) property line to reconstruct the parking lot. . 5 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. of landscaping at it the side (north) property line to reconstruct the parking lot. 5900 Olsoli'Memorial Highway (06-10-23) Pictura Graphics, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.36 . 2 ft. off the required point to the front e of 33 ft. at its closest . Purpose: To bring the e . Request: Subd. 6(C)(4) Yard Requirements . ired 20 ft. to a distance of 5 ft. at its closest est) property line. isting building into conformance. rom Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(4) Yard Requirements the required 10ft. to a distance of 5 ft. at its closest point to the side (west) property line. To allow for the "future 22 stalls" located at the south end of the property. Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(4) Yard Requirements . 3 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 7 ft. at its closest point to the side (north) property line. . Purpose: To allow for the reconstruction of the parking lot at the north end of the property. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24,2006 Page 10 . Grimes referred to the requested variances and explained that the applicant has decided not to request the third and fourth items listed above. Therefore, the variance requests that are left both concern bringing the existing building into conformance. Cera noted that there is a truck trailer and some pallets being stored on the property and asked if that is allowed. Grimes stated that he has not received any complaints about this property, but that permanent outdoor storage should be screened in the Industrial zoning district. He noted that the Board could make that a condition of approval if they wished but that it is already stated in the Zoning Code t tdoor storage is not allowed without proper screening. . 15 ft. off the req property Iin Id their Grimes stated that Pictura Graphics has been successful in Gol like to expand their building. He stated that the applicant has proposal not needing any variances. Reed Robinson, Architect for the project, stated that t will be brought inside when the proposed addition is c west corner of the property and stated that he th' property at some point so the building probably red outside refe d to the south quired some of their rmance. Boudreau-Landis opened the public hear" comment, Boudreau-Landis closed th ring no one wishing to . MOVED by Cera, seconded by the following variance requests: tion carried unanimously to approve . 2 ft. off the required 3 property line to bring e of 33 ft. at its closest point to the front (east) ,ing into conformance. distance of 5 ft. at its closest point to the side (west) g building into conformance. III. . . '. . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax)- Date: November 13, 2006 To; Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Bryan D. Gadow, Planning Intern Subject: 101 Lawn Terrace (06-11-24) Golden Home Builders, Applicant Golden Home Builders owns the property at 101 Lawn Terrace. The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 O(A), 3(b), Side Yard Setbac~, in order to bring the existing home into conformance. The existing structure is a single family residential home with attached garage, and 5,183 square feet of building coverage. A permit for the construction of a deck addition was granted on September 8,2006. A survey was required to obtain information regarding the existing structures on the property. The applicant states that his hardship is that the new house was placed six and one-tenth (6 & 1/10) inches too far south near the property line during the surveying and construction phases, which caused the home to be out of conformance with the side yard setback requirements within a single-family residential zoning district. The applicant contends that there was an error on the survey that caused the house to be incorrectly placed. Please see the attached surveys, dated 11/18/05 and 10/18/06 for the difference in side yard setback distance. The project requires a variance from the following City Code Regulations: . Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(3b), Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the required side yard setbacks are determined by the lot width at the minimum required front setback line. In the case of lots having a width greater than 65 feet and less than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 12.5 feet. The requested variance is for 0.6 ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 11.9 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 2006. Prior to Golden Home Builders' submittal, no previous variances have been filed for this property. / 5430 54Ol) 1101 Lawn Terrace 25 .-1 c; ~ G: )( ~ III 1tIO 101 104 109 112 117 2llO 2DI) 2.01 - - e! I 209 Utl l20 m ~ 301 :!Il'l8 no lI09 400 - 315 319 327 4()9 . " \ .~~ 'i~, \\,''''~)>o . "'~ 'l'~ '~Oq wo S300 ~, ~~ ''f}. ,;. ...~o ....~~ ~, 1'$0 (l'~ ,,~ ~'" ~<> .p Gl.l!NWOOf) AVI! ~' ~, ~ 't';. " ....~ "J- .p ~ <$< 115 2U 5212 COLONIAL DR ,!I.'U1 SU1 52.01 Sl21 5111 S031 sot 509 517 sou 5Ol) soo 516 632 Ga4 (l City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address of Zrty involved in this application: ,J IJ I Itt.(,.. . ~./JA.4 <--' 2. Applicant: .~~ N.~ 11~ Name .F/lf- ~ J~ ad a~ Address ~ ~ -I I ~"" Ss.2Lc. . C~S(.{telZiP 9.rJ- lJ>(,~ d:lJ) Business Phone Home Phone Cj..r J-l/) t, - ();J.:J , Cell Phone Email Address 3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. =J Iu. h4/.~M< .~ <l-k~<~1 --.J~ ~ ~ I ~~4- ~ .A.1-UJ, ~l~ t1A1 jAAdJ::, ~ tfJ -~LM;""' ~ ~J~4 . 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. . Jj~{). -J~ Signature 0 Applicant 6. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner .b~() ~. Signature of wner Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. A brief statementpf the hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation" of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. Variance application fee, as follows: $125 - single family residential; $225 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans)and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be receiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comrnent on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements rega~l"g the Pro.tr' Print Name jVl t; -+ .J- ~ k 6kM Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Address 2 y ~.., '1'~ ~fuJtA- Me-0(ee (. aM;~ ~r<(~1\ Q~~rS((\ ]r;ti~ Address ~ U.va V1 --r:e W~ C-L-, Address 5/ 6 () t;o'o/lla.k Jr Address Address Address Address Established in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 7601 89.3. .3 GOLDEN HOME BUILDERS FF;L tl99.0 Minneapolis, Minnesot.a 55428 Property located in Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota ~uru!rY .ors TC SIT 890.49 ~ ~ tl3 "- "- ~ Q1rrtifirat.r ~ ~ r I \ I I I I I I , LB94. 8 15'4- 'l.; I I I \ \ I I I I ~4,~ I C) ~ "AS - BUILT J GRADING SURVEY" ....- 10 ?51 /--.... / -... ~ ~. ~ --J TC SIT 892. :26 TC SIT tl97.7.3 I / I I I 8'l3.$. ,. \ "'<i . Ssrv~ f\'S~\ \ ,I ! I ~b;1- "'8&<\.", I \ \I gq4t> ~,l. qriVSW,sy I I I I I I I ~~.~~~ I ....... . . . I . s1'6.0 ~RI \ L_----------L---~--l----~ ~I II,.." ! W.1 ' ~ --...;" " ~6li &&<<.~ "- -~------------~~ " 6B~.1 800$-\;- , ~ - .... -- -.....;.- \00,00 t ... ~ \ \ o ~ I -b ~ .,;::;;"-,-- f?op F;J r The only easements shown are fram plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of 011 buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. . INVOICE F.B.NO. SCALE: NO. 7~37-g 1029-24 1 " = 20' . o Denotes Iron Monument o Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation @ Denotes Proposed Elevation ......, Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading pion before excavation and construction. ~"k.' 8'~~ >1' A$-"19u,d+ Top of Block ~sr.-~.iicl4i Garage Floor I!Js'!:'~i!i+ Lowest Floor WafhkJ Type of Building Full13a&ement Walkout Denotes existing contour line . fI/D aB7.7 S;goed eM t of October 2006 Drawn By g. ~ Lot 4, Block 1, LAWN TERRACE ESTATES Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 or Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 File Name Ite- 4-1 fb 101 601 inv 7 3056.dwg . ) 0 I ~w"-t ~ n r; () I I ( I F Signed ~ SCF\f~NED Established in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 219$.3 GOLDEN HOME BUILDERS Property located in Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota FFt. e99.0 7601 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55.428 ~urur!J orz Q1rrtifiratr TC 6fT 2190. 49 IF;" Pine ~.21 .,. ~ I I I I ~ / 1~.OO Note: Garage dropped a total of 2.0 feet (3 courses) per building plan. Top Iron Se!>.60 Qj \.) ~ \... \... Qj \-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I f 12'0. ',~"""""" ~/'>.~ / " / " / " ..... ,.. : / ::xtension of .....'....."',.. @ . / )-. ~ w811 ......... .? ~~~~ .... ............... <'l A ......... Gl ,.. '" ..... .. / '.... / "" / ~ r.p " ","'-wall ~..... 219$.5 Top T,' Willi Ii w1:t 'T~ 4 895.2(/ 219~.2 S .. g> - 890.21 1J)"v ti I I / 2196."3"" : ............/10.0.. l~ ",/ 0 : .... // :q. ~ iI'i /",/ 1.0',e; I i ~ ~ / I 2'0. n;'Pine ,..' .. :.Je92.9,-,"" """.5 : / /ll%.. 054./ 1}'6" r @: ~ ""2. ~_. I. ....,.....-.J ~"'''''''*. p' ~"89$.0 t ~-_......; I . >>,4" /- -~-- ..: . 2195.7;\ }. .}...J-......~..,(..<...J . _____---- ~ ~ . /. 893.0 ,../' 1 ~ ". :N---.---- - - -- / ~: __- .. =~ ,_ . ..' r------~- ...",.10 tr-....' 1--- ... / N: . /. ,,'&5.;' / - . * 20' Pi'lt!1 e9ib. 9 I I I .1.. \ 1'rJVt1WiI!J( I I I ~ ' 16 7.% I I . r::> \ I \ I \ (VI~ ~ Ia ~ ~ ~ -l TC 61T 2192.26 I / I I I I I I t \ I I . ,89:;'.2 ~rv I TC 61T 2192.7$ 7 21219.9 ~o/ Iron 2195.$1 f'l2.of> oC; ao ~IL.\~ V .4 CAN T 8217.4 x ~ 'i. The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. . We hereby certify thot this is a true and correct representotion of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of 011 buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 31 st day of October 2005. Rev 1{-o5-0S ~EE LoCA;rlln.J> IDrawn By ff. ~ )q File Name Ite-4-1 fb1 01601 inv73056.dwg Lot 4, Block 1. LAWN TERRACE ESTATES (Not a recorded plat) INVOICE F.B.NO. SCALE: 73056 1016-01 20' . NO. 1 " o Denotes Iron Monument CJ Denotes Wood HUb Set for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation ~~ Denotes Proposed Elevation .- I;lenotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades ore subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan ond development or grading plan before excavation and construction. 8c:l8. So 8c:lb.O 86c:l. 8 Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Full BCl$ement walkout ....-'....._- Denotes existing contour line . .... - - Denotes proposed contour line ~ " .1; // i!' :- rl I f /"-"'. (oF"" f l ~ i ~ i tJ..Iv.kiu-- . Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 or . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: November 13,2006 Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Teresa Murphy, Planning Intern 2510 Mendelssohn Avenue Verizon Wireless To: From: Subject: Verizon Wireless is the owner of the property located at 2510 Mendelssohn Avenue. The property includes an existing 11,995 sq. ft. main building and 388 sq. ft. accessory building. Verizon Wireless is proposing a 1,455 sq. ft. addition on the south side of the existing building (no variance needed). They are also proposing an awning or canopy be placed along the east side of the existing building to provide climatic protection to the newly proposed HVAC ductwork which will be mounted to the east side of the building. The variance request has only to do with the placement of the awning or canopy along the east side of the building. According to the applicant's submittal, the hardship with this property is that greater HVAC ventilation and cooling i'g needed. Due to space limitations and in order to maintain. continuous cooling capability, the ductwork for the new equipment will need to be located on the east side of the existing building. The variance request is to allow for the construction of a new duct arcade. The proposed project requires the following variances from City Code: Section 11.30, Subd. 6(8)(3) Side Yard Setback Requirements. The Zoning Code states that side yard setbacks in the Commercial Zoning District shall be at least 20 ft. if it adjoins another commercially zoned premise. The variance request is for 7 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 13 ft. at its closest point to the side (east) property line to allow for the awning or canopy to cover the new HV AC ductwork. In October 2001, variances were approved for this property to allow for the construction of a new front vestibule and to bring the existing building and front canopy into conformance with front yard setbacks. The following variances were granted; 2.3 ft. off the required 75 ft. front yard setback requirement to a distance of 72.7 ft. forthe existing building at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Avenue North, 10.38 ft. off the required 75 ft. to a distance of 64.62 ft. for the proposed vestibule at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Ave North, and 25 ft. off the required 75 ft. to a distance of 47.7 ft. for the existing front canopy at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Avenue North. In September 1993, a variance was approved for this property for 5.5 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 14.5 ft. from the north side property line so that a new radio tower could be built. \ \ \ 16 ~ ~ \ ~ iP ." l! ~ I "-'l l! ~ ! ~__~,"'_IS. ~.ilt<(C'<03lSllISWS i Iu !lit s Ii flu J: F lil: , 1 2510 Mendelssohn Avenue HmAVf!N MfOIaNe lAKE RD W o 2S04 o <l> '~:y~" .~~ ~202.. \n&\ " ,;0, 1 . City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For OffIce Use Only: Application No. Date Received BZA Meeting Date Amount Received 1. Street address of property involved in this application: 2510 Mendelssohn Avenue 2. Applicant: Verizon Wireless Name 180 Washinaton Valley Road Address Bedminster. NJ 07921 City/StatelZip 913-344-2833 Business Phone Home Phone Cell Phone _Lisa.Rogers@VerizonWireless.com Email Address 3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. The variance reauest involves only the placement of an awnina or canopv alona the east side of the existina buildina. This canopy is desianed to provide moderate climactic protection to the newly proposed HVAC ductwork which will be mounted to the east side of the buildina. 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. As the capacity needs of this switch facilitv increase so has the need for greater HV AC ventilation and coolina. The new HVAC eauipment will be housed within an addition to the south of the existing building (does not require a variance). Due to space limitations within the existing building and the need to maintain continuous cooling capability. the ductwork for the new HVAC eauipment will need to run alona the east side of the building utilizing existina building penetrations from the current ductwork scheme. The canopy is necessary to provide a level of protection for the ductwork necessary to assure consistent trouble free operation and reauires placement within the 20 foot setback. 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. .3v. L ~t!)N.rV~ nN,? ~61::.""'Nr FI!J~ 1/~7f!.~ZIPN' vqJtrlrr..r 6. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner Signature of owner Variance Application Submittal: . The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: _X_ Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. _X_ A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. _X_ A brief statement of the hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. _X_ You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. X_ Variance application fee, as follows: $125 - single family residential; $225 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ceiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. .. Print Name "De. 6 y'" c\.. 0 { $.0 1""\ ("" m.' . .J _____ ~i\.SoN S <=- ~~-<f v.-) e.. s+W I -e.-U. 1 Ll'f LJ 0 r ~ Print Name Comment Address oJ SOD Me ~~\ ~ 'S 6~\.{\ Signature Print Nam Address Comment Signature L. -e. -e P rc: l)~' i+t~\~(t Lf Comment .\],1......-1' / " Kl _.~,I >""'_ '. <- \~,.... ~ '1 .; / e~d el{5oh '-'\ AddressfYl ed lp~ ~ ctr ~ ~f' l>\ ttl. \ 0 fA c~ Signature Print Name CVl~l-!::l .5+- ~t'Q().f'"fj tv\ ~ +- - 1111 t.j(,l/IN1~ II -/1;~()b Comment n~ GU\ (I (.i€r 0+"0 So st-o.ll))~\ h'\aft \..;,).(1[ i II +&1I~" ,~Vk Address ~ +05"' MeJltc.IV1(f' L~k M Si.gna.ture ..L.V'lC, lnr IQv"Lt!ljM)(,. - "5,{oppJ b.j . k.vtl...t. - IIt/\ alii, u.~ Address .,;( 4d~ ~Yl~kl~e.I:;~ ~ .~ (', Print Name ((.) V\ oL 0 I..'}'I ( '^ i' ~ W'< <S Comment \'\Q t:J<<\"~4,. - j"h')p)) ~\2.e 4..+- a-. 4 0 4- -- iAo alii. ~~-.er Signature Address ~ 40_4- I4llls~ .. Q Print Name Comment Signature Address . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: November 13, 2006 From: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Bryan D. Gadow, Planning Intern 8815 23rd Avenue North Eva N!~beck and Lorelei Lussier, Applicants To: Subject: . Eva Neubeck and Lorelei Lussier own the property at 8815 23rd Avenue North. The applicants are requesting variances from Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(1), Accessory Structure Location Requirements; Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(2) , Front Yard Setbacks; Section 11.72, Subd. 3(A)(1) Fence Height Requirements; and Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1), Front Yard Setback Requirements, in order to construct two additions to their home. These additions include the construction of an in-ground swimming pool and porch addition. The applicants were informed that a current survey is required as part of the variance application, however it was not included as part of the application. This staff report is based upon the 08/17/1996 survey submitted for a previous variance request, and the applicants' renderings submitted with the current application. According to the plans submitted as part of the application, the owners desire to construct an in-ground pool that is 576 sq. ft., which would be located 10ft. to the southeast of the existing house and setback 10ft. from the south property line. The proposed new porch addition will be attached to the east side of the existing house, and is 448 sq. ft. The porch addition will be set 30 ft. from east property line. A staff review of the city file indicates that the applicants received a variance to Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback, to permit the construction of a 675.12 sq. ft. conforming deck on the south side of the house. The applicants plan to reduce the size of this deck to 200 sq. ft. to provide space for the proposed in-ground pool. The applicants contend that their hardship is that the property was originally erected facing the wrong street, 23rd St. as opposed to Cavell Ave. The house location creates a large side yard, which the applicants claim impinges on their ability to utilize their property. A review of the 1996 survey indicates that the house is 40.7 ft. from the north property line. As the driveway is located on north side of the property, the applicants desire to utilize the open space on the east and southeast portions of the site for their expansion projects. However, they note that the current zoning requirements for Front Yard Setbacks and Accessory Structure Locations prevent them from utilizing this space. . . . . The project requires variances from the following City Code Regulations: . Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(1), Accessory Structure Location Requirements The City Code states that a detached accessory structure shall be located completely to the rear of the principal structure, unless it is built with frost footings. The requested variance is to waive the rear siting requirement, as due to the location of the existing deck structure, the proposed pool cannot be located completely within the rear of the principal structure. . Section 11.21, Subd.11(A)(2), Front Yard Setback Requirements The City Code states that accessory structures shall be located no less than 35 feet from the front property line along a street right-of-way line. The variance request is for 7 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 28 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line to allow for the construction of the proposed pool. . Section 11.72, S~bd. 3(A)(1), Fence Height Requirements The City Code states that fences in the front yard shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. The variance request is for 1 ft. higher than the allowed 4 ft. to a height of 5 ft. in the front yard along the (east) property line. This would allow the applicants to meet the city standard of a required 5 ft. high fence around the proposed swimming pool. . Section 11.21, Subd. 1 O(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements The City Code states that accessory structures shall be located no less than 35 feet from the front property line along a street right-of-way line. The variance request is for 5 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 30 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line to allow for the construction of the proposed porch addition. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1963. The only previous variance request for this property is noted above. No other major additions have been made to the house since that time. 234ll 2385 tlMS 025 ~75 ~ 2380 .ZHS z ~ i IIn1 Z!l4iI 2380 2380 ~ D2S 233l) 2340 .2335 2!l4iI U2D nas U2D tl94S lJ90S III 8845 g U45 Z24!l n45 OZ5 ~ 2240 " 2200 ~ 2.2Z5 m :lit 2230 2225 ms :uos 2210 22:tO 2.150 2165 :uos 216S 2160 Z 21t'iO Ii 2UI) nss 'It 2.150 215S :i nss Ii ;j 21liO I!tcm J>t III ;wo 214!:l :1145 tlMS n2!:l 88t'iO 884lI 8810 2125 2110 2115 ~ ELGIN J>l N U2D 8815 23rd Avenue North nos uoo ... not noo ll540 . i '\l I I ft?~:?P'''A/:/t?b?~~/ : ;' - -. /t?tf! t7? : m~4S " / ~ ~ / ~ ~J I I~- ~ "\\ /I\ ~"j ~ .' ~) '\) I'~:...., ~~\ ((\ i ~ ~ kJ ~~\ ) ~ ',"; 7', ~ ~ ~, ' ,,~, (' c' ,,)' ," ~..., >, !> . "-, .j '1. " ~ ", " T1 : ~r\ " \ " \; , I ;P.? , ~p I.is--:~ -,';:--- ~;-,\s--. --- . '~ I~ ~, ....~ I " ,~ " r G~_, "~"-?Q , .;P . -:'::y y$ I ~!o(:a I ~.-o ~.-- -.-...-..--- ~. --------.--- ~....-O.."l'; , --'-- ~~ c.<>~, ~~ --.........---..-.. ~~~ --... - ~ ... --.. - '4- _. ~ t ~ ~ f\ f ~' ~~ l ~ ~\S. \) I '\{ .j Ii &~I --- .f"O;' - - R~:.j ) ~ ~ l' ~~ 'i ~~~ ~ '~. .~~'~ ~~~. ~ ~ '\) ~ ~, ~ ,). ~ ......, ~ _ rt?.2 ~ f - --- ~ ~ ~r - ~'~ '\. '~t; ~ ~ ~ '\, c. t 'w, , .~ $~ . '~ b ~~"< ,i~, ~ ~~ ~ ; ~ <:\' -0 '\ ~ - - l ;~ - - - '" - 'j l~ \ ~ ~ ~ '\ ~ ~ ~ V\ ~ ~~ 1 (' ~-. , fill -.i ~p '\ ~'\)~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~v.. ftl~~= ~ \J ~ \~ \~ \, ~ ~ ,. \ -."'_"_"~",.----..,.-.. :" I ~ ~ " ~ I '~ ~ .. ~ ,," ,\, 1,' l\ ~ \' n ~,,'t t J~ .~ tJ Q~\ .\..\ f~ \' ~g 0 . \/',..," ~ ~~ ~ ~\;\ </;! ~~ \.. .,.,~ ~.,.. .,...~".m_,__._....,...._."._~.~_~_ 1 -r ~.~ ~~l V.J ;, if" t Il't V '\ ~ I"~', t-.,. -- ~ G\ - - - /J/t;? 410/:?e::J t!" .?'? /6 .-- ... .... ~-' o '-< ;------ -'''";.;::'~''':::-:-:-::=';..;::::..-:::--:-:---=.;;:-.~..:;:;....:...,~ :-~,:::_--...- - ~cf'Q1ff~ #J1!!-AI ~ :. . . .': ",;~~-~':'.:~-"~:. --,J~~~>>t;..z;\,;'.~.:~~~J.;~::; (' .,..~,:....-~\~/~;., ~~'" '. ":,''''');,<,, <,,,;,,"0) .t" ';':';:;:'--} ,,..', ,..,';"., ' ~':.~ :""";":" :.>~.: ... . ..~t;..,.~~-. ",-.'~,.,<.~..-..;' ': ,:~:!, ~t.q'.;.'117{':'. ,. . .. ., ' ',. . ~ "t:~:'~t~~ft;~F.~,:::, ,,' ,"; ,.,-/ ~t. .- . ~ ~J ~-l City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address of property involved in this application: ::;->815 d. 3!5 AvE !'it) 2. Applicant: EVA Name NEfJBECK l LVRE:.LE' d 3\'5 AvE NO Lf;LSS Ie R <18/5 Address 6<-OL/i;7)! Y/ IfU1::I / 1)/'1 05- ~y A 7 City/Stite/Zip Business Phone 7&'6-SCll-/'f~3 Home Phone Cell Phone ej()eu..beck e f\etsCCi..{el ()e-J Email Address 3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. &~ (&~h~) ~~e.S+ ~ \to..nCLv>.""- ~ i) 6u.:L<l "..~ ~ 2) b\-\.-\ \a ~\I)~'jV'ol~ g\.~l W\NU ~ ~ot . 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. &~~ Signature of ' pplicant 6. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Evtc /JeiLktk ,l.iJalei lusSier Print Name of owner ~Jt/~t~~ Signat of owner Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. A brief statement~f the hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. Variance application fee, as follows: $125 - single family residential; $225 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be receiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily ag'ree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. } Print Name !<. a +h \ c.~V1 E. O/~ u' I . Comment J Signature ~f4' CJ)UJ-- /71()/)C1 meMeY ~~~ j(~ rf}, ~ t<,(Jf>~ 't'T b v "Z ;V\ ~ ~ JOO ,'6 tJ /1(\ '-.4 I f2rJ{I~ ~ , , Address;(,2 '/0 ~ ~.. l fU;-.., Print Name Comment Signature Address~CXJLNed/avl( -flo Print Name ?-' ~ 0 '.-; (' -$ (../6<-\... :4- V f .AJ Comment Signature Address ).. 30'-'- <. ,d ;.,It ;Cf... h-JirJ:: / Print Name :.JlAJ '1 A '3 (1'"\\0',' e. Comment it~\ ~ 'jcn\A- ~~rr.~L b.J_.ph61U- +1/oiR Signature '~ hl1lv'lM-{'>J' Address ;t;)-')..<; Print Name ~A)J.,J *7c~f?'1Trnn ::::~ J:~ {o~-J-c \ \ -;~L2 iJo Address ~L(5 2~ct I\Je, lJ. .' f' Print Name ...~) u d ; J-11 A. Pas + u r1-, CJ . Comment /- 4J Ifl, ~ Signature 7'& {! - ,~ ,-- - 1110/ J I v Print Name ~a M d ~c/Zl.~~ {,VtA:... {lid I Address - Comment Signature Address t~C,~t '7 3D ~ AC)t,fCAll- .,. v..,Jut~ t\<U..M 'I~':~ . 4. -:. \ 2- 'Set <S4of. s ~U'75 . "7 " ';;:'.'~.'! J ". /Ly- "0\;\11:.." () (iY .f,~".Ii!: F l.y lA)6od --1'. I . ~._.iZ !~1/ !ce SeP-J ?J; ~L ?J I \Y 6y~ ~ ~r "f t,,~~t'~. 41 r tJ'~A~. S tA) ~ ~r+;e"r I~t? ktt. (;"';~ f?)~,...ti!~ ,/ ;t'~t~~ /4> c.. . ~ llll! 0 C J:(" 1).,,,,\.1.. (~' Q> ", /i if ~-l ~ '13/1, ~ j:.I\7Vt( ,i:'#'\' ;> SIc~:1-1 if , ~ ! I P#~ yd\ I ';; &,,' f'<C"'~ '. . z. / ~ ," 1'y.) ef'. \ .___ I,,;! n' !.....1 / '1-.. ! - . !" ~I.) (, 11> (J' .;:- f ! -..'-< .._,-...,..._.~~.~---.,..- tZ;' -P ~tf'l1'~ n _ /;) 0 6;n__L_ . ~" ,A / SCI SSl>1?S T12u<;s . I I ; , i I I ___ Zf X 6' L/i) I bll De 10' I II i ' , )1' I Olf({iJ I f/ 0 C -~7 JOIsT K ' I 6' . pore h 1-1"') f) L~ c:: f(" \ . __"f-/ ,J"" . PLA~ . ....- 9C AlE- fit / II . /7 v \ '71"10". \--IQt) $>L vJp,lJ ~. , ~Q(l .. }JeX' (1... '. ! <.,,-~1.." ~- ' \ .3z";<90 f':-. //~ \Y 7?: 'f. ~fI r ) VI 0'0 ~..J -Pt'e#> ~IX If! b' ~k'f ~ I b~ (!It tA)';"~(AouJ 441 ~~t .f'r-om ~~(AL1' fiful>) ,6{ . 22-1 __t(x /1./ 2! 51 ~~; r' I -> I I I ,,'" I I 1/ ' ~'.lx t:f .I f b' . 'F)o~' ~ f /..;Q_()(< PLh ~ --,--- .. ."-,-,-"._-"""",,~.,.,.,,."^-,_...-- _sc~~ /:4- I.. ,/ ~ .--~~ _.---~.c.. _._.<~__M_.",-'."."-'" . , .,;' 0) .A";'!5\ \ { tr:?U ,~..,\P'l V'! / t l CDf\(,er.lt -... "- -tJ ! '\p.. J .. . aJI tJ (; A MO\). I;.~. VJ tIff Y. Sf' ~ ('j' ~ '. ,f, thllO ,U M .,.."'" n ,) 'L~ . . _~ (~f""':\ /:::? ..::so' i7 ,,,,,- ,e. t;("7 {\ , ,,'V L,..'... ...,.. ,Yo:" ~ 77 . ,- t ! j I I I I I I I I ! I I I ! ! I I i t i I I I I I ! I I I \ i \ ; ; I t r , , I i t ~ j , I f ~ 1 \ I i t , I I i I I I ~ I I i i , i , I i ! I ! , r ! l . l: \ IIf' , rel)l , :2 I i , I ~ i I I i I ; i , I I I I I I i f i t i , 1 f t I ! 11././ ~ l ~ ~ , (It.!t.1 t I I I I I r t I I fl 1 i f n 1 ,./1/ , , i z. '>( :> 'll ~', . [..:Jo 7:~t c;. 21'" 10,. Jl! . '..- ,() .. ", ,-t' I b C'4'},oh ft" '\ ~. I"~ ~~~,;. J.I'l;(J.'~"'..'. rl~' ...... ..' ~.. .' . IJ'.'>II' w $;,~,( 9'1 f"st .., ,'%." 0 .."" J ,/?" { . t., 'V/ X 1/ tE:u , '$."tf,.,.t ~Mii .,v ...,;; V~.' ." .0') ~~h , '.. <:-1' 'X.'O I f::_~-I, ~ t I .,.. ","W'. .'. "'" II. ~ j )" (J to' 'IJ) '; (11:, Y 41h dlit"~' <. 1 (U"S 'C' . $.... ......1 ,.... ! <. 'i'lli'. " " ",' ,..,. <;~ ..d J' r" 1 I" i )<to r l? , ::..t;; .; IX ,.) )( ! ; AU L'vIM \?.t.~ 'Ir'i!,(,ted \/) <:. t 1;~ . ;'fIp.\\ '0 t,.'.' ~~t': ...,-...,.... /I ,I. . "-, '..,,~ '" " "- "'. .-,.~",,,,,.."_.,,,.,.."-~....,-~'" ; _._-~.,._,." .~\ ...."...,.---. -_.-~ tt.' --~ \.~- -=- ~=-~-==~=- ~-,............_._.._''''-,.__._...- \ ._-----=,,,.==="..=_._.~,:..=~~...~ \' .....- ---"""".... "' E'" -" ..-" ,...--' .. " I =-~=_.=. .~-_.=.: \ ~-"" ' "".-.".. r'" - ..................-.- _. <~ -'-"~- t- -. 1= r~1 -.=-ffi'- 1~:.1 -=~"_..- ,,,--='--=f- -~...,.~I_..,.,.,-",.".,-,."" -_........"-~._---- ----.........,..-.- ".~..=....._,.,..',._.'..~,...,....., .--.,--",.,...".,...- ~..~.,.,~-,......_.-...>~........."""-'-"'~"""-" . _~"~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,_,-",""_"'.'"__''''"'''_' ....... .~..~r. .," "" ,.".,-'"! ! -.,."."""-.,,,,, ,,,... ."..,.._~ ~-\ "'''~'''''''' ! I ! ~"~'."-"~ Ir",.,....,.. i I ""-_..~......~.',-"--,_.~---- . r.... \ 1, \ JI I L-..- ___,",^"., I ,._ ,"'___' I -, "'''."......__...... I *...,....................,.,-... ..n'"''' ,,,.,,. ! . \ I ._""" ...." I ~"""'..,,'_,......,.~,;.. ~..._- t '. """""---''''.-''-'' . \ _.<.".".,~ _........._"_.~...__"......._<__............_..v,,"'_...~~ ! .,....~---~;"..._.. .~~.., -r:----.-.--..-.-. - .., J ..c___ ....____"__~ ,.,..-,-"""."..". . . ~- "-. ..... . ......".__.". c -'-'" .-..-- . ----1 i ---I ._..,L . \ ~ -~---- ~ -----_..,- . -- ..--- ~ """w....,,,. .......-~.... -" . -"-;" '>OijIl'rr _..............~__.......---...;o,.....- .- lB--\ ~;::;:;? -====-==-~'.l~ . -----='"~'~H I /' #fi'"'~/ j' ~~,..~.~"..~._- / /' .,/, ;,,~ / .'../ ;' I "-:'1/ '., Y%< .-".--.- t, I " ~,-+';>/~/ :~<'. /;~.. _~:-~ \ J/~_,_~ >~/:;// ' _. " /" / ' ------..-..-."." ,..../.... //. _.............._._,~......~.~,-,..~'""~-- .-1/'.. ,''''/ J .~/ './/,,/ // / ./ -"'~"'----"~--'"'~"'>'--'""-'~''''''''''''''''''''''''''"''''''''''''''''''''''---''',-- ~:=_=:~',t\,':fJ;~\' l.. ':"'''"-''''-~ -~="""O!''''''-'''''',' \: ......,.---- \ .._-'",,"-.. .".,,- . , ) - \ \ I \,p\ A,) '1' ,/ i