12-20-06 BZA Agenda
Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular Meeting
e Wednesday, December 20,2006
6:30 pm
200 Brookview Parkway
Brookview Community Center
I. Approval of Minutes - November 28, 2006
II. The Petitions are:
4125 Beverly Avenue (06-12-27)
Brad Colehour, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(2) Rear Yard Setback
Requirements
. 14 ft. off the required 22 ft. to a distance of 8 ft. at its closest
point to the rear yard (south) property line.
e
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home with an attached
garage. (The existing home will be demolished.)
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(c) Side Yard
Setback Requirements
. 3 ft. off the required 7 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point
to the side yard (west) property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home with an attached
garage. (The existing home will be demolished.)
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(c) Side Yard
Setback Requirements
. 7 ft. off the required 11ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point
to the side yard (east) property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home with an attached
garage. (The existing home will be demolished.)
.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 9 Building Lot Coverage
Requirements
e · 9% more than the allowed 40% of lot coverage.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home with an attached
garage. (The existing home will be demolished.)
900 Angelo Drive (06-12-28)
Jeffrey and Tammy Schweigert, Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(a) Side Yard
Setback Requirements
. 8 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 7 ft. at its closest
point to the side yard (south) property line.
Purpose: To allow for the re-construction of an existing deck.
III. Other Business
e
IV. Adjournment
e
2
Minutes of a Regular.Meeting of the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
.
November 28, 2006
A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday,
November 28, 2006 in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden
Valley, Minnesota. Chair Boudreau-Landis called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
e applicant is requesting a .6 ft. variance from the side yard
ents in order to bring the existing home into conformance. The house
was re mpleted and it was determined by the "as built" survey submitted to the
Inspections Department that the foundation was off by .6 feet.
I. Approval of Minutes - October 24, 2006
Those present were Members Boudreau-Landis, Morrissey, Nederveld,
Planning Commission Representative McCarty. Also present were Dir
and Development Mark Grimes, Planning Intern Bryan Gadow and A
Assistant Lisa Wittman.
McCarty stated that he should have been listed as ab
meeting. .
MOVED by Nederveld, seconded by Sell and m
the minutes with the above correction.
unanimously to approve
.
II. The Petitions are:
101 Lawn Terrace (0
Golden Home Bu'
Request:
e required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 11.9 ft. at its
est point to the side yard (south) property line.
ing the existing home into conformance.
Gary Irene, Applicant, explained that he had the lot surveyed before he built the house,
but he is guessing that when the cement footings were poured they were off by .6 feet.
.
Sell stated that he doesn't think the City would gain anything by placing this property
into a non-conforming status. McCarty said he agreed.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
November 28, 2006
Page 2
.
Nederveld asked if during the building process there were inspections done on the
footings. Grimes stated that there were inspections done and that is how staff found out
that the footings were put in the wrong location.
Boudreau-Landis opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to
comment, Boudreau-Landis closed the public hearing.
MOVED by Sell, seconded by Nederveld and motion carried unanimously to approve
the variance request for .6 ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 1 its
closest point to the side yard (south) property line.
ting Verizon Wireless, explained the reason for the proposed new
that they will be removing the old air conditioning units that are
on the east side of the building and replacing them with new ones
along t side of the building. New ducts would run along the east side of the
building to ring the air conditioning into the bu"ilding on the east side. The duct work
must be covered to protect it from the elements. He said the property will look better
with the units covered as well.
2510 Mendelssohn Avenue
Verizon Wireless, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.30, Su
Requirements
. 7 ft. off the required 20
point to the side y "
e of 13 ft. at its closest
line.
.
Purpose:
Grimes referred to a location m
northwestern corner of the C'
that they are proposing to
would be located within
steep slope on this prope
proposed duct encl
; . J this property is located in the far
-"':ii~':'-:
ed to lMe applicant's request and explained
closure on the east side of their building that
t property line; He stated that there is a fairly
ecaus of that it will be very difficult to see this
Boudreau-Lan
should be ft.
yard (e
pplicant would like to clarify their variance request. It
ed 20 ft. to a distance of 11 ft. at its closest point to the side
.
Boudreau-Landis asked the applicant if they had looked at other locations for the duct
work. Buell said that they looked at a number of other locations but that the location
"they are proposing would work and look the best. He added that the new awning will
match the existing building.
-.
.
.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
November 28, 2006
Page 3
McCarty asked if the new air conditioning units could be placed on the roof. Buell
explained that the existing duct work is already located on the east side of the building.
Sell asked if the building has a flat roof. Buell said yes. Sell expressed concern about
placing the air conditioning units on a flat roof.
Boudreau-Landis opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to
comment, Boudreau-Landis closed the public hearing.
Nederveld said he looked at the property and the area in question is v
hard to see from any street. He stated that the applicant currently ha
conditioning units themselves on the east side of the building with t
because they are not structures. It seems reasonable to allow to In
or canopy over the duct work in the same location as where c iti
are now located.
MOVED by Morrissey, seconded by Sell and motion
the variance request for 9 ft. off the required 20 ft
point to the side yard (east) property line.
to approve
11 ft. at its closest
8815 23rd Avenue North
Eva Neubeck and Lorelei Lus
Request:
, Subd. 11(A)(1) Accessory Structure
.
'mming pool would not be located completely
of the principal structure
construction of a swimming pool.
from Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(2) Front Yard Setback
irements
. 7 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 28 ft. at its closest
point to the front yard (east) property line.
Purpose:
To allow for the construction of a swimming pool.
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.72, Subd. 3(A)(1) Fence Height
Requirements
. 1 ft. higher than the allowed 4 ft. to a height of 5 ft. in. the front
yard along the (east) property line.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
November 28, 2006
Page 4
.
Purpose: To allow for the required 5 ft. high fence around the proposed
swimming pool.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(1) Front Yard Setback
Requirements
He referred to the existing deck located on the
r:educed in order to allow for the correct s
be located at least 1 0 feet from a struc
. 10ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 25 ft. at its closest
point to the front yard (east) property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new porch add
Grimes referred to the property on a location map. He explain
proposing to install a swimming pool and to build a 3 seaso
existing home. He. pointed out that the survey submitted by t
proposed home addition drawn on it using an incorrec cale.
variance request listed above has been corrected to r
a distance of25 ft. at its closest point to the east
xplained that it would be
roposed pool. (Pools must
.
Grimes stated that he has receiv
have concerns about this prop
until they have a better und
proposed addition is 28 ft
ft. in size. He added tha
size which would thn re
lis om neighbors who have said they
the requests to be denied or tabled
the sc e of the project. Grimes noted that the
nd the proposed swimming pool is 36 ft. x 16
and the pool could potentially be reduced in
h smaller variances.
Id have to be located to be considered conforming.
t her location they could install the pool that would
ents because the house was placed in the middle of the lot
hern most edge of the deck is considered the rear of the house
d to the house. Grimes said yes.
Eva Ne pplicant, stated that the property is awkward because of the way the
house is situated on the lot. She referred to the neighboring property to the north and
stated that they have a porch similar to the one they are proposing to build.
.
Lorelei Lussier, applicant, showed pictures of their property and explained where the
proposed porch would be built. She noted that the proposed porch would line up
visually with the house to the south and it would be located the same distance to the
front property as the house.to the south.
.
.
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
November 28, 2006
Page 5
Sell asked the applicants if they would be willing to make the porch addition smaller.
Lussier said they would be willing to make the, addition smaller but that they would like
the pool to behind the porch addition.
Sell said he thought that a 20 ft. x 16 ft. porch addition would be better. Lussier noted
that they would still need a variance with a 20 ft. x 16 ft. porch.
Nederveld asked how big of a porch addition the applicants could build without needing
a variance. McCarty said a porch addition could be 18 ft. wide without a
variance.
Sell noted that the house directly to the south of the subject pr
approximately 32 feet to the same front property line (Cavell
would be hard to hold the applicants to a different set of rul
south of them.
Grimes referred to the proposed fence around the
with the neighboring fence to the south. Lussier
Nederveld asked the applicants if they hav
addition. Lussier said they have started
any footings yet.
ootings yet for the
on but they have not put in
Boudreau-Landis asked the ap
explained that the existing dec
feet between the deck and
the plans for the existing deck. Lussier
in order to allow for the required 10
Grimes referred to the su
between the deck e
pool over 5 feet to t
would be willin
they reduced th
variance
fence
state hat it shows that there would be 15 feet
e explained to the applicants that if they moved the
d only require a 2-foot variance. Lussier said they
sed pool 5 feet to the west. McCarty added that if
pool by a couple of feet theywouldn't need the front yard
. I need the variances for the location of the pool and the
G
requ
that he
applicants
the proposed addition were to conform with the setback
re is not much they can do about the neighbors concerns. He added
e to table the requests regarding the pool in order to allow the
e to explain the project better to the neighbors.
Sell stated that if the applicants built a 20-foot wide addition they would still need a 3-
foot variance but it would be visually in line with the house to the south so he wouldn't
have a problem with it. Morrissey clarified that they are considering a variance for 3 ft.
off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 32 ft. at its closest point to the front (east)
property line and then the porch could be whatever size fits within that parameter.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
November 28, 2006
Page 6
.
Boudreau-Landis explained to the applicants that it is up to them if they want to cut
down the size ofthe porch addition. Neubeck and Lussier both said they'd be willing to
make the proposed porch addition smaller. Boudreau-Landis clarified that the
applicants could come back to the Board with the pool proposal.
MOVED by Sen, seconded by Morrissey and motion carried unanimously to approve a
variance for 3 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 32 ft. at its closest point to the
front yard (east) property line to allow for the construction of a new porch addition.
The variances regarding the pool addition will be tabled in order to allo licants
time to redesign the pool plans and/or location and to have further di ut the
pool with their neighbors.
III. Other Business
The Board discussed rescheduling their regular Dece
either December 20 or December 21. Staff will po
which date works best.
g oliday party to
bers to figure out
IV. Adjournment
. The meeting was adjourned at 8: 15 p
.
.
06-12-27
4125 Beverly Avenue
.
Brad Colehour, Applicant
.
.
.
.
Hey
Planning
163-593-8095/163-593-8109 (fax)
Date:
December 14, 2006
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Bryan D. Gadow, Planning Intern
Subject:
4125 Beverly Avenue (06-12-27)
Brad Colehour, Applicant
Mr. Colehour owns the property located at 4125 Beverly Ave., and wishes to demolish the
existing structure and construct a new home. The existing structure is a one and a half story
building with 967.2 square feet of building coverage.
To apply for this variance, a survey was required. Attached please find the survey and an
explanatory letter from the applicant.
The proposed project requires the following variances from City Code:
Buildin~ Setback Variances
Section 11.21, Subd.10(A)(2) Rear Yard Setback Requirements. The Zoning Code
states that the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. The variance
request is for 14 ft. off the required 22 ft. toa distance of 8 ft. at the building's closest
point to the rear yard (south) property line.
Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(c) Side Yard Setback Requirements. The Zoning
Code states that in the case of lots having a width of 65 feet or less, the North or West
side yard setback shall be 10 percent of the lot width, and the South or East side yard
setback shall be 20 percent of the lot width (up to 12.5 feet). The variance request is
for 3 ft. off the required 7 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at the building's closest point to the
side yard (west) property line.
Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(3)(c)Side Yard Setbacks Requirements. The Zoning
Code states that in the case of lots having a width of 65 feet or less, the North or West
side yard setback shall be 10 percent of the lot width, and the South or East side yard
setback shall be 20 percent of the lot width (up to 12.5 feet). The variance request is
for 7 ft. off the required 11 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at the building's closest point to the
side yard (east) property line.
1
.
.
.
Section 11.21, Subd. 9 Building Lot Coverage Requirements. The Zoning Code
states that no lot or parcel in an R-1 Zoning District shall have a lot coverage of more
than 40 percent for a lot or parcel less than 5,000 square feet in area. The variance
requestis for 9 percent more lot coverage than the allowed 40 percent.
A review of the City file indicates that no previous variances have been filed for this property.
2
) S16 ~1
511
S12 Z
Gl ~
509
50S - i
SOlI 42DO I
4215 4211 42U 4205
-......
!
...
8
I
.4U <
14125 Beverly Ave
4200
416
4212
3llO
4216
4200
4212
POPLAR DR.
4125
421S
200
,~l!i4bow~
J'~.
166
M~~:a+-.kciU~, C~{C!'1;.ozaw~
.
~ 519
516 515
512 513
508
$01
SOlI
WOOOSTOCf( AVE
411~
449
4124
41111 4*
401
4W 4113
m
4124
245
221
Z19
425
420
411
40S
416
401
RS
llll
3
I
~
lI:
404
m
400
317
320
316
311
312
lOS
<<m
303
240
221
22ll
2/l$\1
G9~ . ~'
, , l'Yoq,':\ ':~,. eI'
~~~'" ii\ hl .~ lq,~~t
~ 'LlblD ", " , \..~bto,~~ (" {\> , (~~'S,4)
'f NtS>1~'/~"W \, '?'S8g0H~, /,1\
_ t~ 7..0.~~ ' I.. 'l.o.ol', !;/'('6""PrbJ
(, A lle.y f" ~':~i,;1 ,~"'~~~;;:. ~:\'f::,';;. '~,-~..~::-~ '"
N.4 x"frOVEdJi "l~~f_::~-i'{i;~;~r
{~r~5:"":;~~_~ :.~---
",0 -< ~,J'" (J
"",0 ,,'" ",W",'" ,v
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR: Jason Kohls
4125 BeverlY Ave.
Golden Valley, MN.
.EGALDESCRIPTION: Lot 23; '''GEENWOOD''.
LEGEND:
Scale: I inch = 20 feet
,Bearings lis shown are assumed"
'.. Denotes Iron Monument Found
'0, Denotes Iron Monument Set Capped
by RLS No. 10948
It ( ) Denotes Spot Elevations
Note: ~ench Mark is top of Hydrant @ Poplar Dr.
& Meadow La. N. = 856.233 feet (NGVD-29).
Note: Distances as measured are in feet, tenths
and hundredths Of a foot.
, PROPOSED ELEVATIONS:
(869.01 ft.)Top of Current Block
(860.00 ft.) Top of Basement Floor
Note: Proposed top of basement tIoor elevation is subject to
change to fit final construction plans. The Land Surveyor is
not re.sponsible for changes made on el~;v.ations during foUndation
c,onstruction. Said elevation is shown for proposed elevation only
and is; to be established and 'checked by the contractor. ~ ~
1t-' Q.I Co V
<) ...J,;.) "13""
C'l -+- ,~ I'll
.q- ... ' u !i!i
:If ~~~
....:....-:":'\
<..l-~
- N'\
~....,
, 1) ....
<Y"-'
G)
.'
/.....
Q
..-V
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
I hereby 'fy that this survey was prepared by me and that I am a d~y~"
.ist ed d Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota.
s eye by me this ~day of ()"r~;." 2006.
d
:~~'-s~'^~
\\ So.<< 1'\1<-'(.,
, : C~"o).
o ' '
ERLY AVE. ~
(~s<<1.q) co~,b>
@ ,~
:\ 3:'sh~~~
, I "! To'll..J.='( U~i:}7 ' , ~b
0- ,I '0 . P"'7'", ..sI
__ _ I,. N8f1 ovflfw N,8Cf6'1f.'rf.W: tf
'! ,~ 'Z.Mrl ' ,'1.:6;;0' , f ~ -:-:-
~ ", ~ ~
'"e'/.;- ~'t-<7~ '.~,"
, ~.~ 1:& ~~. I' ~
':11'... .~ ")z --e ~
'!;I ~ !/ OG" ~ .r.-
~ '~.-
",-,"'" ,-: a:.
~...c c-l
.+ ~
o \. .
"- 0 0 (
- -:z. ~ (\
, ~t:~;J)
I).~ '
"
,~
J
~
~'
,~
$ 1f>8'
^-
, 5:-,?::\ 0
l~'O V
$
N'
N
~ ~e
~\
,~ \,
'(9 ___' ~
11>o!
'lA-
To,~I!l/"ck: ~Wf,{}1
6st. fl.: 8"1, '11
1'rD. f.l. :: .j...1J>.00
L.\\J
...{;'f.N.:'
V'\ .~, ~
~.....
'::3- lL
~,
-1l
\,..
4-
>-..
,i...
'~
.If"
i1:.
-v
3
~
~
" \C.~'
lV
..>>
-0
~Q'tb
~ 2-
~
c!...,
"",
ci
+
t.+
~
~'^ "::'
......
/0.'2.
N"
\,J) ~
~..
~
'-w
"':t- I
. N' kC':
0....0
0.0
o _
O~
Z,
..;,
N
...
".
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR: Jason Kohls
4125 Beverbr Ave.
Golden Valley, MN.
II
.LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 23;'''GLENWOOD''.
LEGEND: .
Scale: I inch = 20 feet
. Bearings lis shown are assumed' .
... Denotes Iron Monument Found
. o. Denotes Iron Monument Set Capped
by RLS No. 10948
. ( ) Denotes Spot Elevations .
Note: Bench Mark is top of Hydrant @ Poplar Dr.
& Meadow La. N. = 856.233 feet (NGVD-29).
Note: Distancesas measured are in feet, tenths
and hundredths Of a foot.
. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS:
. (869.01 ft.)Top of Current Block
(860.00 ft.) Top of Basement Floor
Note: Proposed top of basement floor elevation is subject to
change to fit firuiJ. construction plans; The Land Surveyor is
not re.sponsible for changes made on el~vations during foimdation
c.onstruction. Said elevation is shown for proposed elevation only
and is, to be established and checked by the contractor.
I A lle.y ."
\NbT J/'l'fl'"oved)!
~'tI<!.r" MH-'Top
. (S-t':,o)'
,0 0 .
.~ B EVE. R L Y A. V E. ~
( gW,q) 6~ol~
- ~
.. ~r. .' ~J
1\ . ,..lz-4--~'VJ b
, .. , . I "!" I To(lll,J,= (8"'$,ll-1)';""<y I ~
-",-. '.__ 1:~N8ft'd1 , 'w N.8ti"",.i'w:f
'.! - '2,.6.01 ,1.:6:io' ~f ~ ---:-:-
~. , . ~. Cf'~
~-/'; ~i;'7_ ..~
. iSC"" 1:'& i ~. I '1J.
':/r_ ."" ",l!': -.e A
!/ ~ V' <>00" l-
~
'\,
"
. Yi. '
A..
o.
V
~
l
('I
I"
~...g
IJ'- Q! ~ Qj
Q ...;J . ~ '''''\1"'
C"l-+- .~ 11'I
...,. t.:: . tl .\;1
:If ~.~~
'.. ,
>-
,l...
~
-V'''
5t..
.
J....
o
,,-V
~
-..D,c-J
~..
~
"
...
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:.
I hereby . fy that this survey was prepared by me and that I am a duly..
'gist ed d Surveyor under the,' laws of the State of Minnesota.
s eye bymethis~dayofO"r-~_ 2006.
-\
<
",,0
, I
.. .~. .~:.~('~::..
,<
.
We are asking for a Rear Setback variance. The site's front to rear distance is 110' which
would require a Rear Setback of 22'. We would like use an attached garage with a Rear
Setback of 8' -0". The location of the attached garage will help provide a smoother
transition from the alley to driveway. The house is located at the end ofthe block's alley
and directly to the east is a house with a similar Rear Setback. Our garage location also
provides a longer side yard along this adjacent house which will create a buffer zone
(light and.air) between the properties as well as providing a natural means for rainwater
absorption.
.
.
City of Golden Valley
Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA)
Zoning Code Variance Application
1.
Street address of property involved in this application:
if I;) 5 Bever-l'7 A.Ye..
Applicant: f3~ Cole-Ao vY
2.
Name
(L(d7 lee vi evJ 5 ~z.; /b
Address City/State/Zip
(;;1- ~~ ~Lf ~/t}- 3)/. 9~3
Business Phone (c-el( Home Phone eell F'11111111&
~c()leJ.. oi./Y'@ 11\5 11- Co~
Email Address
3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site
plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be
approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued.
4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance
(see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs,
or other evidence, if appropriate.
5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also
understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted,
is not taken within one year, the variance expires.
~
Signature of Applicant
By signing this form, you are. only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that
you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project.
Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other
statements regarding the project.
.rintName ~t2H~i} U6J1/S1J3/J
Comment
% (~--cl
Address f20Ub t/e.,eLy
/
Signature
Print Name
IVE.Al, k-I }SI-Ai-
Comment
Signature
G-.~
Address '1-'1.,1 &fll~/t..J.,,}
.
Print Name Lt.-cJt-1f7 -J~
Comment
Address
4-ZtJo J3~
1-1 /7 f5.~ LI'
Signatur.
Print Name
Comment c: rn PL
~ 1/ Cer1;f:3)(,td
~dT ~ln-le;-)
Signature
Address Lf;;(oS;- Bever! '-
~
PrinlName 1(u.~e/ K. S"'yJev
:~::::~ ~!f. -
Address q fA '-I Po /J 10..(/ 7)v*, 'u e
I
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Wittman, Lisa
From:
Sent:
4t:
Jaroslav Cervenka [Jardace@earthlink.net]
Tuesday, December 12, 20062:51 PM
Wittman, Lisa
Dear Ms. Wittman: Mr.Brad Colehour applied for a variances to build new home on 4125 Beverly
Ave. We object, forcefully, to the enlargement of his lot westwards by 3 feet. This enlargement will
leave only 4 feet from the future new house to the border of our lot, which is very close as it is. Thank
you in advance for considering .
our objection. Sincerely ypours, Jaroslav and Alexandra Cervenka
(Residence: 4205 Beverly Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422, tel: 763377
8872)
.
.
1
.
.
r------ -
~
--------------.
4'-ff lrt-ft'
~
~
;!:
I~
I
I ~
..
.....'" ", ~..
n
;
R
-
n
I
I
. .1-
.
40\"\"
if
1\0"0
{7 \f!;J
(}-:hb
r.jJ.jJ
'vO~ /" '
"7 {7
';7
N~ . I
W~ '1\1'
f /~ 1; i
~'/
SITE PLAN
LOT - 4400 SOIFT
SITE COVERAGE NOT GREATER THAN 40% OF LOT - 1760 SOIFT
HOUSE COVERAGE - 1550 SOIFT
REAR SET BACK 20% OF LOT DEPTH - 22'
SIDE YARD SET BACK (NORTH OR WEST 10%) - 4'
SIDE YARD SET BACK (SOUTH OR EAST 20%) - 8'
BASEMENT - 1225 SOIFT.
FIRST FLOOR (L1V1ING) - 1010 SOIFT.
GARAGE - 482 SOIFT
TOTAL - 1492 SOIFT
SECOND FLOOR - 1336 SOIFT.
MASTER BEDROOM DECK - 210 SOIFT.
TOTAL INTERIOR FIRST AND SECOND - 2346 SO/FT.
HOUSE TOTAL (INCLUDING BASEMENT AND GARAGE) - 4053 SO/F"
.
.
.
..vJ
~ lIft- C.
\~/\ \.if)
\ (,'\' \z,J-
\Y I--?
-Stl
r - -.---- - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -...., --,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
~..o- ...0- I
! 113'..0- 13'..0-
I I I
I ..-zt ..-r r-et I
I 1
C - - .-. J...
- ]
I I~--- ~
I I[~-=:== I
11-.... ..-- .-..--
---- -
II .
II I ~
I ~
~
I "
...
- - - .a:L- - . - .-
~ I UP
=
....J>>.- _ . ~ I
I ~ :: I
-.. .......... ... I
.. . ..._. M_
- -- -
f---
1--- I
I f--- I
.m .......... .
- ---. -
---
- - .- - - .....-
I I
I
I
.~ I
I
I
I
I
r--------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ I ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--- I-
---
-
I
~ I
I
I
L__. ~------------ 1--- ----'--- __...I
~..o- 21'..0- $..0- t..o- ~..o-
~
-
BASEMENT PLAN
1/8" - 1'-0"
-
.
.
.
i
-
~
III
~
,..
,:.
h
tl.
~
l
-......- - - - - - - - - - - - -"'--,
1
.
4II-t"
r------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~-t"
aW-
1.:r-V-
r-1' t-1' $-t" $ rr
r 1 T 1
I
I
I ~
"'-'"
-
! III I I::JJ
II! I
I
II [[JJ [Q]
""\
if
"
._.J"
r-tf
"-1 .
-1..
~
r1 'r
! 'IN
1[",
I ~ ,:.
I ... -
I
i
L
h
!2
!-,-
J3
ED-------lP-
01
I;
I
01
. I 1 I 1 I
I I
"" I I _I I I
I... 1 I V "'" I 1 1 'r
\l; I I \l I I 10
+- I I ~ / I I I
S-ll"l 1 ~ 1 1 J
T 1 1 1 I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I 1 I I I
I I I I I
T I I I 1
I
.)
<<:
e..,
b
t>>
~II
_I' 'r f- ...;:-- $-tf ~-r r
( \ ""f- ~ '-I
'- ./ I .to.. . () r---...
: ~ -0 [jJ I \ r
I I I
I:
~
r-- .,
I
I
I
I
....! -
I
~
~
!
0;
1......._ .__ ...._... ...__ _.
:)
00'1 J
~i )
~~
-LJ
<<:
I
01
01
I'
01
...../
I
.
I
~---
r ] ('ff
"
" ......
~
~ G1
IT
-- ---
-
~
-
---
1
I
I
I
.J.I
r
I
I
I
I
"--
';
10
~
.
I
I
I
I
'1'-If
1\
-- I----o--__________~-
~-If
'If-lf
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"
-
l.,..J'?""
IllI
~
~
i\
I---
I'-If
'1'-If
~
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
*
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
T
....
~-If
.
.
.
r - - - - - - - -- -.. ------ -- - -- - - - --I
,,/-0'
114' 114'
1'-10" 14 1-4' 14 t t .-i' 1'-tt
I I I I I
I ;!: ~ ,2
I ~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~
I r-l n- -
1 ~
I .......- \ !
I ~ ~ -
1
1 n~ 0....-
1------ -------
- - .,.. ~ . -
, ~ g~ ,
~
:
'..
.J~.... ~
I !
(q D>
- ((1 b)
....j I....
~ I ~
I
I
I
- -I, - - . - ON I--
~
1 ~ ~
I ~
.. ...
1-
\J .
1 QJ[T] ~
I
(-\I~ - X -
~ 8 '"
~ -
" ./1 ~
1
I
I I I
~ 1 ~
I -
~ @] DOl@] ~ I
I
1 ~ --'-'-"-'j -
I
1 I
I~ ~ i ~
i
I
I
I '" ~ -
1 ~ g
I ~
,?
. V
I I
1 I
~ I
I I I
I
I
. .
I \
I
1 ~
I
'---- ~------_...- ---- I
11'4 rl4
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
1/8" = l' -0"
..
-
.
.
.
.
.
--\. z:
~o
CO;o
~--f
II :J:
--\.rrl
_I
Irrl
0<
~)>
--I
o
z:
l
I i
I
I
I
"T" .-- .........
I
I
I
I
L,,_
..
.
.
. . .
~ rr1 := I ; I ;9~ .p ., I ;11
~)> .Ii . ~ '" .& ! i !
co (.f) ~ r
:::--1 r i~ II I
II rr1
I
~ rr1 I I I I I
- <
I)>
0_--1 -.. -
- - -I I I I
0
:z
..-4' ..-4' 1'-1" ..-4'
o
...-...."....,
(,j
-~
o
~
o
I
q
I
I
I
L
I
o
, a,
t ,
D
I a,
1- I
I I
i a!
1'"........
::i I Ii!
rf~ )..~
/ I I : I I
( II /::
r. I I JJ' I,,'
,..i I I
I I [
II /
i
I I ,.J..'
I I r/
IIJ
qi
D
CJ
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
: r(
I
LJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L....
P.
~
~
I I
I I
~
di
~
I.
1:1 '.'-"-
..
.
.
.
.
.
-..
P-
I
~~ p-m ;'1 "iI "' i~
!!! t .s ! i !
~fTl '"
OJ (J) ~ II
::: --f I ,
II fTl
I I ~ ~
~ fTl ~t
~< t-G' t-G'
I)>
O--f I I I I
:::- ~ I
0
:z:
CJ
I
I
,
I
,
,
I
,
I
1
,
,
1
!
/,
~I
I.
: I
, .
if
D
~
~
o
1
,
, !
I
1
I i
1
I
I
I
B
I
--r-..-.
I
I
I
I
o
A
.
.
.
..
.
.
~ (J)
'-....... 0
COc
:::--1
II ::c
rrl
~r
-rrl
'<
0_)>
---I
o
:z:
~~ %
~~ ~% '\
dh iZl. ~h?S-' rg
~4h ~~ .~~ ~
" ~ ,a~ I
· .BI1 .1 i-" '" \ '"', ~ l K :.' -2
~roi ~~I i~~ !-i! r ~ '^'~ ~V
-n l~ ~ ii I I ~.~ n 0$'1 n I~ ffq,
'I 'I ~ I~ ~~~~~~~
-L" - '1"'~-t~----;;;;~~~0M~\~:i~ '\,,~
L )~ J '_ r;')J> 'D ~ 'V (41 (;ff
I - . I 50 y" ~\ l'?:;}:'is'~ J'(,
I , [] I jf!i I /.:t1lh C';<J,J ;?\ "
I l: I J~h ~~~~~ ~~
I 'I <i" ,i 9" S 1( 7 S"1'}, '!1\J '4,.
I W' 1":Jl., N J"
I, , v ~
I I
II ~ t !
i
I !
,
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
06-12-28
900 Angelo Drive
.
Jeffrey and Tammy Schweigert, Applicants
.
.
.
.
Hey
Planning
763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax)
Date:
December 8, 2006
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Teresa Murphy, Planning Intern
Subject:
900 Angelo Drive
Jeffrey and Tammy Schweigert, Applicants
Jeffrey and Tammy Schwigert are the owners of the property located at 900 Angelo Drive. The
Schwigerts are proposing removal and reconstruction of their existing deck.
According to the applicant's submittal, the hardship with this property is that the existing deck
poses safety concerns due to a missing railing and steep step downs from the sliding door
entry and from the back entry to the ground. The existing deck does not conform to side yard
setback requirements. The variance request is to make the new proposed deck conforming.
The proposed project requires the following variance from City Code;
Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(a) Side Yard Setback Requirements. The Zoning Code
states that side yards in the Single Family Zoning District (R-1) on lots with a width of 100 ft. or
greater shall be 15 ft. The variance request is for 8 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 7
ft. at its closest point to the side (south) property line to allow the new proposed deck to be
conforming.
1141.
11M) U41 1140 1141 11-40 1141
1130 Wt 1130 1131
1130 1131 1130 un
E
11m 1121 ~ 1120 U2l
UlO 1121 UlO 1121
1100 1101 1100 5104
5340 sno S300 1100 .SlOO
DU
s:m
1030 1025
~
t'\
~
~~
'ftlOTLAND ItD
Z
5301 !
i
::::l
~
1041
1040
5131
5111
sost
1030
1031
1900 Angelo Drive
(1)
HOLm" Y I.N
110O
1010 lOOt
931
9!10
921
1)01
82lI
Ma:t~'o'1l\~~'a\fS.' ~~.(I~-~S~:.~~~,~~
.
SChaper Park
631
2B
110O
o
Jeff Schweigert
Subject: 900 Angelo
e?ate: Tuesday, December 5,2006 11:53 AM
From: Jeff Schweigert <jeff@boomisland.com>
Conversation: 900 Angelo
12/5/06
We purchased the house in late 2005 from it's previous owner in it's "as .is" condition. The
deck (being referenced) on the south-east side of the house was missing a railing entirely,
not to mention it was never built to code. Because we have to two small children we added
new custom metal and stainless cable railings to address the safety issues. Then other
problem is that there was a steep step down from the slider to the deck and an even worse
steep down from the back entry to the ground. These step downs are also out of code.
Raising and connecting the two sliders would address these safety issues, creating a safe
unified s c.
r
. ~J2 ~ ~,,~ - ~'1::r'i <kQp
.
Page 1 of 1
City of Golden Valley
Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA)
Zoning Code Variance Application
1. Street address of property involved in this application:
10 D A-1\JG~'-() [) tl tiE J (,oL-oeN Jltu€'j J M~ ,,5'S"</2:2--
2. Applicant: J"'e~F,2.e-'-f /tN.(J JlTty\ m'-f 5:C'# w-el &-CfL-r
Name
9()iJ I+/V G et...o Dfl..1 U-;::
Address
Ol)cDcN \h4u.t'f 6 IAAN <;;f;t.f2-2-
ity/State/Zip
~ r2-';'~ tis - 00 <f 2
Business Phone
?-fR 6- 6rL!-ID20
Home Phone
i (,/~- ~lp5-7YJ'f
Cell Phone
Email Address
jet.f@ bODm is\ 6\-h~.~OW1
3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site
plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be
approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued.
'23~ It.,' ~ ~ ~.e.I'vli!~-U\lb+t"'3 "kc..k- ~ r4~~\~
',t ~ ~ ~>( ~~+.
4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance
(see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs,
or other evidence, if appropriate.
~ pr ~""'+() II\- t-
5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also
understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted,
is not taken within one year, the variance expires.
6. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the
owner of this property:
JE~Y J". $c\N6l&EI2.T
Print Name of owner
Variance Application Submittal:
The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete
application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted:
J Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners.
..J A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey
requirements.
-LL:. A brief statementpf the hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see
Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
J
You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in
this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of
any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit
is issued.
J
Variance application fee, as follows: $125 - single family residential; $225 - other
Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners
Note to the variance applicant:
As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all
surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly
across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets.
To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them
about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them
sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your
project and gives them opportunity to comment.
If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at
home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then
write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the
time and place of the BZA meeting. .
Note to surrounding property owners:
This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of
any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be
receiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting.
By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that
you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project.
Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other
statements regarding the project.
Print Name K",r<:..'v\. C-o... "'- 0 V)
Comment
Signature
~C-
,
Address q ~o A vyjel 0 ~h)-e...
Print Name
Comment
~ MaJ~ ~ Q~~-~p-k - OwUU ~~~ ~
. . AddressY!IP JrNL~U> JJaJ v-€
q~\
-.....
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
a
900 ANGELO DRIVE
. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422
EXISTING DECK .
SOUTH SIDE LOOKING NORTH
.
'1/
900 ANGELO DRIVE
. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422
EXISTING DECK
LOOKING EAST FROM INSIDE
.
"?
900 ANGELO DRIVE
. GOLDEN. VALLEY, MN 55422
EXISTING DECK
SOUTH EAST CORNER
.
t
900 ANGELO DRIVE
. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422
EXISTING DECK
~.,
. ~~
EAST LOOKING WEST
.
900 ANGELO DRIVE
. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422
SOUTH EAST VIEW - SHOWING STEP DOWNS FROM SLIDERS
.
.f.'
~':';l'
~:~;' '1'.
~i)r
;l',:
.: \\ ~
.""~ ~ ~
:~ )I.....
:~J'~
::t' \ \fl,
~.~~
~ r~
'\ \"
~:. ~. t-- .
:.~.~
" ,Il,~
,'.h .~~.~~ >
',1/;' ".~
:.w,~"'~
::~"I'"
;>{ :.
!~.'.~:: :..,' .
~.. .
... ...
, "::"t'"
'.. ......
~".,..
.' . . .
~: ~. '..:~' : ~
,,, .' .~
'f" .',.
~':;" ;"::i:~.~
.' ~:~'~.':' ':"~{:
...: '," ~. . :" '".
'.
,.,'
'J
." "
':. ~.
.
:##.'; ,"::,;';!,.::'<' ';:'
!.
,',
:'<d .,:,.:.
'. "
..t'.
.,
. .'
. .. :;'::',':';', t')
:t
· Ill'
"1
~
"
,1,fI
.,....:. .
. ."' .,.
,..'. .
~
"-
.~
,
~
~
... '<:
't
k
,13
~' ,
\'. .
o '.,
l ...
" .
..'
~ . ~ 'r(,.. .' '.
,,~~~J}t.(.\:, _ ...,;
~ ..1 ..
.....&..
.
.
~
~
"
;"
~
~
~
,
If..
~ ~
~^
..' / ~
I ~
. .I ,"
I -.I
I ~
/q. I ",
~
7-
<:;;;::-
~
<'
, <:::>
."
$.
, ~
~\Ii
~
,~' I
~ ~
L\
\
\
\
\
I
I
I
\
\
"\.
.,
''-i/'#-e
Ill.
~
~
"-
" If/I
<
. ~.
"""'-.......
,.....
,. .
,\,,'
, . ..
...:\: '. ".
, \: .
.' \:'
\'
1 .
: \
\
~.".----- ,'., \
-.., "
'2,&:0' . - ,.;..\
'. ....,. .;~..
. . ~l" .
t~
~~
. ~~
. ~l" .:
.'1 "
....
'." .'
- I \
I \ +' 1
I '- /'
1..1'
. ~ ~ ~+-
~ iIi ,l
...':1. l .
I t ~t
, ~. ~
~
.';
40.0'
..t..
,;':.
( .
1 :'
oil
:\ ....
II.',.
- ..t~.,):>"
. . ,..-'
",' .y.':
.' . ;. ~, '
.; . "'~.
, - ~:.:
....
.
.
$:)\ ..
j,..
.:, .
.....'
.,.....
;.' .
.,.'
',; "
" .
. ;\~,.: .
.~
)oi
~
~.
~...,
t'
. ':"~"" .
:.t:~..' .
'fl~l'-
~~ ~. .
, -~~
. ~\fI ~t
'" !:: ~..
't[\
.~.~~
~i~
~'5~
It ,~
,,~
~~..
'; ~~
.~~
~~
.\ .t;
~t
L
.:,. '