The URL can be used to link to this page

06-28-05 BZA Agenda e e e Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, June 28,2005 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - May 24, 2005 II. The Petitions are: 1500 Zealand Avenue N. (05-06-13) Vince Brama, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 14 ft. off the required 30 ft. to a distance of 16 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the addition of a front porch. 7004 Knoll Street (05-06-14) Paul Jaeger, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Setback Requirements . 1.6 ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 10.9 ft. at its closest point to the east side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the reconstruction of a deck 1200 Orkla Drive (05-06-15) Daniel Makev, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 15 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line. Purpose: To allow for a garage addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(3)(b) Side Yard Setback Requirements e e e . 2.5 ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 10ft. at its closest point to the side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for a deck addition. 7400 Western Avenue (05~05~17) Byron & Debra Wieberdink, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(a) Side Yard Setback Requirements . 4 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 11 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (north) property line. Purpose: To allow for the reconstruction of a deck. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd.10(A)(2) Rear Yard Setback Requirements . 9.3 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 15.7 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a three season porch. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 0.2 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 34.8 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (west) property line. Purpose: To bring the existing house into conformance. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment 2 Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals . May 24, 2005 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, May 24, 2005 in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. McCarty called the meeting to order at 7 pm. . Those present were Members Duff, McCarty and Sell and Planning Commission Representative Waldhauser. Also present were Director of Planning a opment Mark Grimes, Planning Intern Aaron Hanauer and Administrative As t Lis Wittman. Member Zinn was absent. I. Approval of Minutes - April 26, 2005 MOVED by Sell, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carrie the April 26, 2005 minutes as submitted. II. The Petitions are: 117 Paisley Lane (05-05-12) Robert Kolasa & Lois Lenarz A Request: . 3(A}(1} Front Yard Fence the allowed 4 ft. height to a distance of 7.5 ft. at, the front yard for the arbor gate. The fence struct re is proposed to be 6.5 ft. at its highest point construction of an arbor/fence in the front yard. rd that this request was tabled from their last meeting. He s changed his request from an 8 foot high fence to a 6.5 foot t the noted hardship is the irregular shape of the property and hboring property could put a 6 foot high fence on the same property Sell agr the property does have an unusual shape and that theoretically this proposed fence is in a front yard, but it "acts" more like a side yard. Waldhauser asked how close the proposed fence would be to Paisley Lane. Sell said he would guess that it is 50 feet from Paisley Lane. He said that this lot is unique and that they also have a deer problem and that the applicant is going through a lot of trouble to maintain this yard. He thinks this new proposal is a good compromise and thatthis is a really questionable front yard. He said he would support this variance request. . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals May 24, 2005 Page 2 . Waldhauser asked if they still need to discuss the proposed pergola. Grimes said that he discussed it with the Inspections Department and that pergolas are not considered structures, however, they should still meet setback requirements. Robert Kolasa, applicant, explained that when he originally talked to his designer they were thinking that the fence structure had to be 8 feet high in order to keep the deer out. Since then he has decided that 8 feet would be too high so he decided to scale it back to the requested 6.5 feet. He showed the Board some pictures of his new proposal and discussed the changes he made from his previous request. He reiterate t the current fence ordinance doesn't address the type of fence/structure he is pro . McCarty asked the applicant if the reason he is proposing the 6. the 6 foot height is so he would be able to stand under it. Kol that the part that is 6.5 feet high is because of the grade an proportional. McCarty said he was concerned that if they grant this want to build a 6.5 foot high fence in order to blo wondered if the applicant's proposed fence cou then the BZA would be granting him what he'd b Kolasa said that the current ordinance and that if anyone wanted to put up have to get a variance. Waldhau the garden is a garden structur apply just to the fence part. the fence to be 6.5 feet h' hitectural garden structures ~hat is higher than 6 feet they would er understanding that the archway into . ht requirement of 4 or 6 feet would at she hares McCarty's concern about allowing McCarty said he do does act more like ardshipin this case even though the area in question ard than a front yard. still proposing the cabling between the fence posts. like to have the cabling for trellising. ic hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, he aring. she appreciates the work Mr. Kolasa has done but she is still concerned g his request. . Duff stated that the City has a new fence ordinance and that the BZA has to be careful about granting variances from it. He said he would like to see a more defined hardship and the fact that the neighbor can have a 6 foot fence but the applicant can only have a 4 foot fence isn't a hardship, it's an oddity. He said that this property is on a cul-de-sac and that there are all kinds of properties in Golden Valley that are odd shaped. He said he- agrees that there is a deer problem and that the ambiguity of the code makes it hard address the issue of garden architecture but he just doesn't see a hardship. . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals May 24, 2005 Page 3 McCarty asked Duff if he would think differently if the proposed fence were 6 feet high instead of 6.5 feet. Duff said no because the hardship has not been articulated. Sell stated that he doesn't think much thought was put into the fence ordinance regarding 6 feet versus 6.5 feet in height. He said the hardship in this case is not with the land but with the placement of the house on the lot. He said Golden Valley is struggling to maintain beauty and value and keeping people here so we need to do something to help people. He added that he has never been afraid of granting a variance with the thought that someone else might ask for the same thing. He said variances are t on a case- by-case basis and this is an area that supports gardens. . Sell stated that he agrees that a gar fences, such as the 20-foot high MOVED by Sell and seconded by Waldhauser to approve the v McCartyasked the applicant if he would like to table his req for a full Board to be present. Kolasa said that he has done everything he can do to said he wants to go forward with the vote and if project he wants to be able to design it how he opportunity to address garden structures in the property line fences and that he would b nt and said that there are a lot of higher than allowed by the code. Waldhauser said that the 0 were to say that this is a uld ap rove the variance request is if the Board that has a pergola on top of it. Duff said that he tho structure is a fence. points but they Board does as the new f mination has been made by staff that the proposed t the applicant and Sell have made many excellent e said the problem he has is that he views what the code when there is a hardship. He agreed that maybe uld use some fine tuning. e. The request to allow 3.5 ft. higher than the allowed 4 ft. of 7 .5 ft. at its highest point in the front yard forthe arbor gate was , cCarty and Waldhauser voted no. Sell voted yes. 3 nor Drive (05-05-09) Peter Steichen. Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Setbacks . . 8.7 ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 3.8 ft. at its closest point to the side yard property line for a garage addition. Purpose: To allow for the addition of a 2-stall garage. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals May 24, 2005 Page 4 . Hanauer referred to a survey of the property and stated that there is a one-car garage and a breezeway currently on the property located 5.8 feet from the side yard property line. He explained that the applicant would like to tear down the existing garage and breezeway and build a two-car gar:age located 3.8 feet from the side yard property line. Waldhauser asked if staff suggested to the applicant that he make the new garage narrower than the requested 22 feet. . Peter Steichen, applicant, stated that he has lived in this house for 5 ye been broken into twice. He said he wants to eliminate the breezeway dated and breezeways tend to collect junk. He referred to the widt 0 garage and stated that he really wants to have two single-car ga one big door because it would fit in better with the time period d it has looks d of Sell asked if the entryway into the house would be in the sa breezeway entry. If so, a 22 foot wide garage makes se b to be required in the new garage for a landing or ste e existing space is going use. McCarty asked if the neighbor to the east is ok ok with it. McCarty opened the public hearing. S closed the public hearing. one wishing to comment, he Waldhauser said she understa that is not a hardship. appeal of having two garage doors but Duff said he thinks the e reasonable plan tha is co supports the reque rage stall is the hardship and that this is a with other variances that have been granted so he Idhauser and motion carried unanimously to approve est: 8.7 ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 3.8 ft. at its d property line for a garage addition. The noted hardship is currently has a one-stall garage. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 11(A)(1) Accessory Structure location . . Detached accessory structures shall be located completely to the rear of the principle structure. The waiver would allow the shed to be built in the side yard. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a potting shed in the side yard. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals May 24, 2005 Page 5 . Hanauerreferred to a survey of the property and explained that the variance request is for an 8 ft. x 12 ft. shed to be located in the side yard, rather than the required rear yard. He showed the Board some pictures of the property and stated thatthe hardship is that there are retaining walls and a fence in the rear yard that make it impossible to access the backyard without walking around the entire house. McCarty asked if the proposed shed would have footings. Grimes said no and explained that if the proposed shed had footings it wouldn't require a variance. Waldhauser said there is a need and access to the back yard is about different storage opti in with the neighborhood Troy Auth, applicant, stated that the primary reason he wants the she where he is proposing it is because there is a severe slope on the ot property and this is the only place they can put it. He said that th a severe autism so they have to have a 5-foot high fence and it . at of the property and their garage is only 19 feet wide. He sai part of a total landscape plan and it will make the patio more noticeable. McCarty said his biggest concern is that it looks . stated that 6 inches of concrete will be poured . McCarty opened the public hearing. Seei closed the public hearing. ne wishing to comment, he it ap ears that the garage isn't an option ked the applicant if they had thought no be ause he wants the look of the shed to fit Sell stated that ther mes in Golden Valley that have sheds in the side yard. Duff stated tha yard. He said u requests. a charac . case is the son's disability and the access to the back eral statute cities are to accommodate reasonable . h the nature of the lot, this proposal won't take away from the od. onded by Duff and motion carried unanimously to approve the c 0 allow for a shed to be built in the side yard rather than the required oted hardship is the fact that the applicant's son has a severe disability. 1500 Zealand Avenue North (05-05-11) Vincent Brama, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(1) Front Yard Setbacks . · 15 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line for the construction of a home. ; Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals May 24, 2005 Page 6 . Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home. Hanauer referred to a survey of the property and explained thatthis same variance was granted back in 1999. It has since lapsed and now the new owner of the property is requesting the same variance in order to build a home. He noted that the hardship with this lot is the steep slope. Grimes stated that the lot to the north received essentially the same variance. Waldhauser confirmed that this proposed house wouldn't be any closer front property line than the existing house to the north. Grimes said that w . Rick Brama, builder for the project, representing the applicant, s drawing of the front of the house. He stated that the foundatio in size and the house will cost approximately $450,000 and He added that if they move the proposed house back any fu cliff. Grimes noted that the applicant would also have Inspections Departments regarding sewer, wate code issues. ngineering and 01 and any building Waldhauser said she assumed that th house on this lot with such a steep houses on lots like this, but the e of during the building permit pr re not interested in building a the City used to be scared about erosl n control measures are taken care McCarty opened the pub!" closed the public hearin 'ng and hearing no one wishing to comment, he e hardship scenario and they can't deny the ded that the City already granted the same variance in " by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to approve the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20 ft. at its closest point to the ine for the construction of a home. The noted hardship is the steep III. Sell referred to some of the survey's submitted with the applications at this meeting and stated that he would like to see more details on the surveys. . IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 pm. . 05-06-13 1500 Zealand Ave. N. . Vince Brama . See Large Size Plans and/or Survey in Planning Department . Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: June 21,2005 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Aaron Hanauer, Planning Department Intern Subject: 1500 Zealand Avenue North (05-06-13) Vincent Brama, Applicant Vince Brama is the buyer of the property at 1500 Zealand Avenue North. The applicant is requesting one variance from Section 11.21, the Single Family Zoning District of the Zoning Code. The applicant proposes to construct an open front porch. The proposed addition would extend 14 feet into the front yard setback to a distance of 16 feet at its closest point. The requested variance will allow for the construction of the porch. . The applicant was granted a variance from Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1) Front Yard Setbacks at the May 24, 2005 BZA meeting to allow for the construction of a single-family home on the vacant lot which allows the home to extend 15 feet into the front yard setback to a distance of 20 feet at its closest point. . The open front porch requires the following variance from City Code: · Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(1), Front Yard Setbacks. City Code states the required front yard setback shall be 35 feet from any front property line along a. street right-of- way line. Open front porches, with no screens, may be built to within 30 feet of a front property line along a street right-of-way line. The requested variance is for 14 feet off the required 30 feet to a distance of 16 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line. City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application No. Date Received BZA Meeting Date Amount Received 1. Street address of property involved in this application: J5"OO ZeAL,,^,O ~I ao'-'~~ VA-LL~ 2. Applicant: \}.'NLf!,.-(, -S~fi~ e.. &t'2AN\A CCt.c"3eA..) Name ~e-A- U~i!IL) ~3,~ Address -:39 '"'It c. "r "" s..r. ~~.~ ?AI\.. tC- City/State/Zip "', 2.- q~, . 0<.,1 c, Business Phone Home Phone Cell Phone Email Address 3. - Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. , (j(-'EjV S , ,".) e::..o I ('ouEl'\. ~~ FAo^","" Polt.C.. ... Eooc ~o r roll.'-IM.O 4 ~cE-r I~T"O 'D~,.'C....""4...e:o Se.-T- BA-c,tc... , 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, .if appropriate. :r F= t..AJfL [)o fUOT .:r1'U~~.a!... .:t""""rO S~..,.. - & Ac.. (c.... -~e. 1-tW':.e.. &.AJ,\..~ ,-M...,L -rv . i\ ~ ft.f$~ BAl..<... 4 Fe.e:..-r. I &.Vt+.c...H tAl, L. '- (7",A c.R_ -n.-fE- ....~ c:.. DveJ\... "'T1+E- C &..,. FF: 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. I- -. r~~ Signature of App lcant ~ ) U i\l. (1, L U U :; I L: I ~ nVI t K b L UUIVlll~ (i I U I~ I~U, jj~ ~, 4 1'- 6. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: ko IJ J; r:~{7J1t~,- Print Name of owner Vj~t ~~ . t!!i/~ ~P(j4 ~ S gnature of owner 'Y@V~ ..- Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify 'that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: Thjs is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be .eiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. I".c:. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. ~66.~~# Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature 2- ------ -- 9fJ li>g ~J coitQ D---I2f / y,,) f' J- <L. ~e0~ I'V\ Address ISD L :z..,..~"( C"t... d ~(?J1J Address '11: Print Name ,^-F<Cr- Comment Signature rint Name Comment Signature Print Name >- Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name .mment Signature 7}J (;&/1 c/-~~ I ct ...;.... ;t/4n~. r:!/I~"" ~J Address Li" f 7->Ot{,/c.uJ1 dl?/ '\~V7~ ~/ltr,;L ~ ~., ~ /Sa-. -Jf Address 16?1 ,.-:; Z.e" &" d 4tH' /v < PI! u.j NI"~ ~ P> {~ Address Address 'n ..,0 !'"'"f Tim jZ j!! . ~o )2: ~~ m ')i(J'J )m ~o "'::D tJ> .. :E ~z )G> 7CfJ 'CfJ t:x: )> .r- . r- '% ~> !< .m '''0 ::n m 'm ,m ,10 m z (") m ~lJ Il/ :f\) 1> I ....l v ~ 'I~ , \J '\ L ~\ o >- / ./ 1\ (\J ~ ~ 1; - r L (lI I-{ ~I 4-:: (T\ \\ \ \- (T\ \)~ ~ ,/ 1-\ j- '.'C' , / I,L .- , I' 'f' '/' j I "I ,'-: :! " ! :': '::j t : '1 f::l.C.~'~:~':~./P'~;t'~~~ a::::rr- I (-:ji::"II::,;I.::': , ~'I::..'~'. :'l~i: :.) <:r1.;~~~..{1!fJ[.':: II I" /'/ ,:",::jl\":'..'l~"li: i I ~:: :.jl. '~~J~)n:. I II' I ::.::.:'ii...:f,::':.>r--Ifil:; II' jl I I . I' _.- . ..", '-I . I '~:"-,J"';l' f..J....1 i j 'i! : I : '. ,- ..:.: :.~. I , (- \. !. ; I I I I I I! i i II I I I I I I I , ,I I bJ I I I I I I I i I: -+-J [JJ I I I I Ir:J I , I U LI Pi H 'tn~4,: ~li~ ~H l ~. r-11f// !VII , i I; 11 I LA /1. V \'~ . 01 --i IT\ - (\ L Lp_ \> I ,-l V r ~ fIl "'-, .,"' ~ ~ -\. ,,-I II r=- - r - \ \J (f ~ ~ r - I I~ ~ ~ 1-0 11> - vJ_ IlL- \ ~ - . " 1 f' I, ~- I G'" I ~ I J .",1 - a ,- o j ,- Q ::- j) ,- Ci :: " 'ilil IlL-==- ==- _J Lb-.~ n .~ ~ !I 1 I~ Ij\} " ',.,i'.'I'I. ' I --'I , I l~ r:!:... ; - . -.... .. II ,I ~~ ~:' (~jY -111,1 /' _n.....~... I . ~ ~ j 'I III ~' I Z^" / -r o,e, I ',- -.J__. I I i II II ), 'I ~ I, II ~ , L:: ...,C=",' '.Co ''''-', I l.t'~-li ~ /, .. ..' i!! i , I' hi '.111 I iif ql I r:li! tj :;1 ! 1....,..1,.11.:/ l' ..1/' ''''I .' Ini.;,.: ;.:.:;.;11 I ,j/ 8i;iFj ~~i fir'i:; J I !i"'f"IL .. I niiiui i d r; - !/iili'i - ---1 ;1; I t;;~=~f~j:f~RY,;z=~~~1i:~,~n:~; ..=---~.-- 'jIl\'\\ ''f., =+ 7\ l~ l\ '1 >- ~Q VI \:..;:: r .~ <:;:;. " 117/8' '..y ~7 I JST5 / / @ CD 1\ i=- I':; L f .J 8 ~ ""'I" - V I \'/ [))~ I /n l t 1//1' I ~\ ,/1 ~ [/ t II ,,~ . 05-06-14 7004 Knoll Street . Paul Jaeger . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: June 22, 2005 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Aaron Hanauer, Planning Department Intern Subject: 7004 Knoll Street (05-06-14) Paul Jaeger, Applicant Paul Jaeger owns the house and property at 7004 Knoll Street. The applicant is requesting one variance from the Single Family Zoning District. The applicant proposes to reconstruct a 16 X 20 ft. deck, the same footprint as the former deck. The survey indicates that the proposed deck would extend 1.6 ft into the side yard setback to a distance of 10.9 ft. at its closest point. The requested variance will allow for the construction of the deck. The project requires the following variance from City Code: · Section 11.21, Subd.10(A)(3)(b), Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states the required side yard setback for lots having a width greater than 65 feet and less than 100 feet, shall be 12.5 feet. The requested variance is for 1.6 feet off the required 12.5 feet to a distance of 10.9 feet at its closest point to the side yard property line. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1954. GERALD T. COYNE 300 BRUNSWICK AVE. S. GOLDEN VALLEY, MINN. MINN. REG. NO. 47.' . - -',- "'--. .:."." -, .,. ',- ," .. --:.: . LAND'SURVEY()RS)<i LOT SURVEYSiCOMPAN'Y" "-'"""'-"";:.' .":"1"_:,,',:', REGISTERED UNDER LA WSOF STATEOF MINNESOTA LICENSED BY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF' MINNEAPOLIS 5H7 W. Broadway 533-9922 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55428 INDUSTRIAL - JUDICIAL COMMERCIAL - TOPOGR,APHICAL CITY LOTS - PLATTING ~urtttynr!i ~trtifitatt RICHARD DEMPSEY .r '. '-. ~.-. ._..~ - . 1 ! --1...-. '" " --. ....- , J' ~ '. 't ,. '\ ---r' '-~ ! . I ?/.4 l' --11 f . 1 -) '_.1. ~i.-':i '.. ',' , t ..~) ('{ .~( /7 ~ "1~ '-~l""d:J~ 20.3.5 01- ! ~ . rJ 1- FOUI-'kj';'! 0" ~l ~ ! I I 29.4 :L 2M,.sJ_ J I~ ." 'I .1;:;- . . f I", ;.' 1-! .. . . ~-' ...,;.:;:. - ~:.". ~ ~_. ~ ,... .' . ;;....,...~;:i..:?.:.'___.._~:_..__.~ -:.,8. _:..~. . .~ 71.1- " ~) -:::r- '-'" ~ "0 ~ I\j K " ,. . 0 ) .f \ . V ,.... "f .;.......... ,! ~ Lot 2JS, except ;4';" \,-','-,". ,,':, ,:"_",C: '-C'-':;-,! ",,":r'" RAYMOND 'A.PRASCH' ..... ..' 6917 IDAHC)^VE~:N>:' .' . BROOKlYN<PARK;' MINN~~ . .,' M.'_~~~!---~~~?::.,~q~" .~1-1:~::;',{ \-". ';",'.--; .. ., -'';''"''.,.-',,;,:--,,.,", .-..4260:.:.... 149;"18 30' DENOTES IRON, 3. . . City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application No. Date Received BZA Meeting Date Amount Received 1. Street address of 700iyolved in tmtion:S t. ~ (i~\ Name 7 00 ~ Ma-II Address bJ~-J7()-4sJJ- 7/)- 5~/- 74rB Business Phone Home Phone ..l ~~I1\ 150 D-ctwest. h~ E iI ddress 2. ~. 5 Q@ ev st: ~~ City/State/Zip ~)o~- fJD.~ /367" Cell Phone Applicant: Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. \\oi- 20 ~u\c~ 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 1U1&...'~ \~t +0 Rf"te. ~t t,'+P''i1J\ oh-\tOrij,~LJeJ. ~l)tJl~ t\e Jeck WoW~ l'&tk~ Jo\oU'I~ 14JSl~ '~ ~4(IA~f; ~ ~ei~ <is 1Ut.1\ 42 "'~~~J. if"'~__ d- ~p'\1Q /. tK?5. 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expire 6. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. A brief statement of the hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. -- Variance application fee, as follows: $125 - single family residential; $225 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a comer, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of a possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be Weiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statement~ regarding the project. Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment _ ~,-:'l'A L,; jH -[/f-~) rf!2{{ cL, /""", \ (, I, i/) I (/\ 1:1 , '/ ,,' , ) (t/L-r!(Lc-tf-';y.t, c~ (J ~ '>. '+; Address 7(~ I ('.l C,-,J/il,) (:t.alJL Si /ei ~-\ ,,-', ,( .,' --\, /~, - l \}~' (. / )/-~~ 'r - 1.' -:\/) - _ .Jl ,"""'!7 ,_' -.,./"') \" .J \ l~ · c LJlf / ( ~,l<f \:.c-..,<~/\<::/ /,1P L . f " "~ " I ~~ " ::-.\ / " ~n c Address ,O( A \, JAj.c{1~;)Q", ,';\-1\ ;p,; "', ,1;\ ~. ~ -. \1,\ ". I" , , I. "''', L/C\&Lv'_ lDJllL~ i ,~\ ,) -/ Signature 't:13.,/', , i,:7tr1f~d ,,~'0jl,U;Y:'(d<, ','-', "\', / Address " T" ".. I> ~ /) /} .int Name lJ~i'MSB4 (yf!)EL-lY,S Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Int Name Comment Signature ",:') J ~'~ -' '1 /' / 1 '..' , ! '\ (.,(, " ( A, " I, - -17,,-.- LrtL-t.;,/ ,A..tt....-/ / "'/ L/ ~~;I t.J /:7<).;J ,- / / ,', , -, ,[...// ~1 --x A/. '/ 1vtL~ <j .r,::'{'d'c., i f'7 :fe:... ' ~ .... ('./ Y5 V1 t1...0.~... .~:::;.::.,-:) , (~ ,,---) " L,"-'"./f -"!I... \.. f ~' .-" .. ._ c::~~~...~7 ',~ " ($i'5~-<(/ J /' Address J; f50 i:t~/i7l- _ , /',~ f''''V1 , 'I [.il/") ../' !l ~ / , / YI:.p, ,7 M /'-':::; f /, )' !---7f'j ,f ./":'_;/;/ r L /)/."'/ , , .:x//:.,t>} -7 , , Address /' c:c//)/ 7<::::// j~'-/--, ,;,:;-/'- Address , 'I . 05-06-15 1200 Orkla Drive . Daniel Makey . . . . Planning 763;.593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: June 22, 2005 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Aaron Hanauer, Planning Department Intern Subject: 1200 Orkla Drive (05-06-15) Daniel Makey, Applicant Daniel Makey owns the house and property at 1200 Orkla Drive. The applicant is requesting two variances from Section 11.21 Single Family Zoning District of the Zoning Code to allow for the following constructions: two-car garage, deck and addition to the home. The proposed two-car garage would consist of tearing down of a single-car garage and breezeway and replacing with a two-car garage. The survey indicates that the existing home is 43.53 ft. from the front property line at its closest point. .The proposed home and garage additions will extend 15 ft. into the front yard setback to a distance of 20 ft. at its closest point. The requested variance from Section 11.21, Subd.1 0 (A)(1) Front Yard Setbacks will allow for the construction of the home and garage additions. The proposed deck would have a setback of 10 feet at its closest point and therefore extend 2.5 feet into the side yard setback. The requested variance from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(3)(b), Side Yard Setbacks will allow for the deck addition. It was determined with this pie-shaped parcel that the front yard property line runs along Orkla Drive and the other two property lines were side property lines. It was also determined with the odd shape of the lot that the Side Yard Setback requirements fall under Sudb. 10(3)(b) (side yard setback of 12.5 ft) and not Subd. 10(3)(a) (side yard setback of 15 ft.) The project requires the following variance from City Code: · Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(1), Front Yard Setbacks. City Code states the required front yard setback shall be 35 feet from any front property line along a street right-of- way line. The requested variance is for 15 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line. · Section 11.21, Subd. 10(3)(b), Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states the required side yard setback for lots having a width greater than 65 feet and less than 100 feet, the side yard set back shall be 12.5 feet. The requested variance is for 2.5 feet off the required 12.5 feet to a distance of 10 feet at its closest point to the side yard property line. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1954 and that no other additions have been made to the house. , r-. . City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application No. Date Received BZA Meeting Date Amount Received 1. Street aqdress of property involved in this application: A\ I ( .1\ n Url<.c\ Uf'\\}f I ''). uf'" r>. 14, V 2. :"\ ' , I I J {tili \ t' , Name /n ( fvtt\ ke \/ ! Applicant: ,It.' ... ,I fU~ < J. .~ f'1~/1clr'! "- Ieee 2)tl Address 6 5l- .); 0-75 }t; t) ) i - 75<L(,- ,{,96 5 Business Phone Home Phone Cell Phone i'J v1A uke y @j~S-f rJa L( (+1'6- Vf 1<< r<; t Cc )-11 Email AddresS' I &\f{ e 3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building.permit is issued. hi'eeUWL'i tilAJ S;lJ\'1I.. (ft"'-1';':\ir~'r~f" ~ lIVIolLP \J,;)fl'{ ~v' ,WI (AA"\;~~L'\ to ~p ""NJ:,Q (\\1\.1 C\\-t<-,(C\.tedZ-(;C\v~v'4.)e t.,;....;.ti''> VI.'J \-c ">CC\L tJ.. ~Ct.~ II.l"''-e.. 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. -Ie.. 35' <;e\-' <'te\l.., '\liIe ,^Dl< ".. ."t." .x,\-' c~ s-hraw1L t\.V\6J\e, '"" \\~'.", -t,^e \0-\- <S~ tl~,t \- Ow' W'!'IIU of- '\\.u \1QCI..t.- ot t\At ,""vU!;e i~ 3"\. "\:(,,t 5. ~ ~,,^d t'^- ,,~e'f '-"~\\o?v', (.\.",''6' \\e. "!\.,r,,\ce \)a."e\' Cl..~e.o\N\IAAC.\ ~t.> ollie i!.c..v', I ~ Illl\.\.l';,\:l.o..i '>'^<.\p-c G\- t~,e tot \,W\\t"J ttU-r o\>*iOJ\s To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. ~ " r-" By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. rint Name 0L /Ie: .;J IllY II"~r61-er'/v Comment ) I Address 1/49 Ot:.t.-i )1- f/J12.i~ UF Signature Print Name . SA {J D '/ .J 0714(. ,:-' 7?flfJV Comment 6kJ- d/PL( .! ~f!~ALil Signature \~ -4 ?~,~ Print NamefhUPrJ C1 ~ ;~ h Y1 ( Cj'//"L l'r1rf_J I . /J Address //1 (){~k.L( , fZU1.~ .' Comment ') Signature Address /14() 0,/1</0. Dr. .int Name Comment L es I feR u ()' s e /1 Signature rJ<<..~.Ru4<Uu. Address II V- S () r k I a- D,. Print Name ~Fi< \ IL- AND G (2.,f:(; W \?;\ <S 'S I Comment Signature CJk^.vf- .. C00A'4() Address ()')..o OK~LA ))tZ Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Imment Signature Address . CERTIFICATION 3 14 AS-BUILT SURVEY RESIDENCE FOFt DAN MAKEY 1200 ORKLA.. DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN LEGEND PLA T <k . Denotes Found Iron Monument o Denotes Setlron Monument @ @ e . Denotes Sanitary Manhole Denotes Sanitary Manhole Denotes Tree Denotes Evergreen STREET It. ALIGNMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 15, Block 1, GOLDEN OAKS Hennepin County, Minnesoata 17 I \\ ~~ ,\ \\ \ \ ~\"T \( CB B ,\ ~ ..~. '. ~ ''\ ~. ~ ~, " ~ ;;RJYE~~ ~ ~. ''''~.. ""~ -:-"" ~. 0 ~~ ___ ~ "".. -=.. ">-... .:::::, ~.- ..- -----=-- '- .,~ --- ~ cc=--. ' ',- ~. - ~". "--, --------. . ~-=-=--- --- -;;;;;;;. .;:... ~. ~ ' - - ~ ~ ~~ ~ -----;;::::- .- .........-.== 13 SCALE 1"=30' 6486 Wayz~ Boulevard:, Mmn~ap~li~,MN S54U..lno ;l;"4l.. .'ph~ei.' (7G3)545..28(l()F~:'.. (95+) 3.77~7?OQ '~"" .E"'ll'lah:mfO(tpedS!nn;com~WElb Si~: tittp:/iedBlllfLCOOl, D......E.i<S.......... .... .... S.,.,.r........"'."i'\. ...... ......; .. ..' .~IGN ..'~ !,;.'"~}~~F..i~ I.NC-.r WOODEN RET. WALL GENERAL NOTES 1. All lot line Bearings are assumed. 2. No title work was furnished for the preparation of this survey to verify the legal description or the existence of any easements or encumbrances. E N o A s I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ve(;:tc! . S ('Ii .~~ ~ e.y: Dated: ~31511 05- VLADIMIR SIVRIVER, LS MN Reg. No. 25105 '''\ ~ CERTIFICATION 3 . . AS - BUILT SURVEY RESIDENCE FOR: DAN MAKEY 1200 ORKLA DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN ( LEGEND PLAT <t . Denotes Found Iron Monument o Denotes Set Iron Monument @ @ e - Denotes Sanitary Manhole Denotes Sanitary Manhole Denotes Tree Denotes Evergreen STREET <t ALIGNMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION 17 + \ I \\ \\ \~\ \\ . CB",\\ " '\ \ . ' ....- B', ' _____ ~~~,'~ .. , · .~~~ I(l-^~ .0, '\~, '" '~ ~ 0\\_ ' '" '''-" ~ .~ ~~ . :,. . . "." ", ,.'.. ~ '-.c. ::c"----'-~ ~ -1~ '''', ~~"~, ._'_ CI "" _ "" '",- -'~ "''-... --------- - ,- 13 . Lot 15, Block 1, GOLDEN OAKS. Hennepin County, Minnesoata SCALE 1"=30' . GENERAL NOTES . ..~/J... M "'_""'~""-"''<l~~''''':vo.:';'~''.' F~NO:INEtEil IN (; ''I': .6480 Way:zata--B';l1.b,~i~clMnme~11l1is,MN554Z6.4710 N'. ~llf:Jrie; (763)54;5-2800 F~: . '. . {~S2r 377-/?9Q e . ~>mai1;'.tilfb(~d,~In:n~COUl WeQSit~;http://edsmn.ccrm D. '.' ':. 'E' ~~Sir ~'~...k"l' .:~. ~ '1fT 'I-'j, "IE' .~.'. '"IIi.." I ~i':r'.' .' ..._ .I.. JIU!I' .I.""'lj. It..... ~ 'it.: ,v;...... .:N;. ........ 'I1Oe" DEN \{:/ (006 <;,;'1 n. If , fl:J'd o A s 1. All lot line Bearings are assumed. 2. No title work was furnished for the preparation of this survey to verify the legal description or the existence of any easements or encumbrances. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. \/eC{{/c..,~"I'~'viVf, Dated: ;J311f!)~ VLADIMIR SIVRIVER, LS' MN Reg. No. 25105 ~~ -~-~-::::::::;~~~ ~;~ , --~- ~;;==o-;;;;=== . .. . 05-06-17 7400 Western Avenue . Byron & Debra Wieberdink . . . . l! Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 ~fax) Date: June 22, 2005 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Aaron Hanauer, Planning Department Intern Subject: 7400 Western Avenue (05-05-17) Byron & Debra Wieberdink, Applicants Byron and Debra Wieberdink own the house and property at 7400 Western Avenue. They are requesting two variance from Section 11.21, the Single Family Zoning District of the Zoning Code. The applicant proposes to construct a three season porch and deck addition. The proposed three season porch would be a southern addition to the current deck. The porch would add approximately 11 ft and 1 in. to the deck. It would also extend 9.3 ft. into the rear yard setback to a distance of 15.7 ft. at its closest point, which is the same setback distance as the current deck. The proposed deck addition would square off the northeast corner of the deck. The deck corner would therefore extend 4 ft into the side yard setback to a distance of 11 ft. along the side property line. This corner would also extend 9.3 ft. into the rear yard setback to a distance of 15.7 ft along the rear property line. The applicants received two variances from Section 11.21 on May 12, 1997 to construct the existing deck. The Rear Yard Setback variance granted was 9 ft off the required 25 ft. The Side Yard Setback variance granted was for 4 ft. off the required 15 ft. The project requires the following variances from City Code: · Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(2) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states that the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. The depth of this parcel is 125 ft, therefore the required rear setback is 25 feet. The requested variance is for 9.3 feet off the required 25 feet to a distance of 15.7 feet at its closest point to the back yard property line. · Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(a), Side Yard Setback. City Code states the required side yard setback for lots having a width greater than 100 feet shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 4 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 11 feet at its closest point to the side yard property line. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1996 and that the current deck, approved in 1997, was the only other addition to the home. City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application No. Date Received BZA Meeting Date Amount Received 1. Street address of property involved in this application: 14-D 0 \;Je0t BV Vt-fn/ vVllA e ) Go \. tlie V\- VO-- \ \ c1 ) ~ ~ . 2. Applicant: N~~VOVL- .;+~d 1&Vo W~io?VJi ",L 1400 vYt0ta ~ . -AJe.Vt\AL- GolJe~ 1",11"''-1 P\~ S9f2:j Address. City/Stateliip 'l~o- 0:?fr-/PSl\ 1[.;?J-5ti \._~ 44B ~l2 -SQD-4g3<9 Business Phone Home Phone Cell Phone b VOl/! vV\C/0ev?"Uvt~ @., 0tl: ~o VD?1 uc.+.:;, ~DVVL E ail Address 3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. 1)~\LILj,:-CO NE CDvvrev 0 .g.-t.(.?j-h lilP d.ec k:- Mtd ade-\ tL~71::>v-v)(\'wv~f-cl'-rI~/iil to d~ck- C soV+~,-e~pl )+he: ~a~rvl-c le~~/~'-; whev-t e)Ci~tr~~7t-arVS Ctv<;: P7I1vI>\Tol. ~ vv.vU'tt\\k n r\~c.-C:- Vv. ?~Yl~/Il :3 "'-}--c~'7CVl ?ovtVt..OV\~-fOVtWV1 D~k-Wi4-1,l 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance'~ (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. ~e~~ a t-tz'i-ch-e.:,l . l 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct I also understand that unless construction of the action appl" able to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance~ . :3 C(~V Vl+ ) J... pov[i'\~ IU, Oi. (' C .{' I.:j S I v\. c\{ v, I v'J v'--v 0 tlV1 w ~"'.e- V:..e_ \N {.-- \/110 v \ d 1\ k .to flit (-e [;t C (<:[7 C~;>~., ~ .eC ~, -~Jt/jI! D!O(:'f!S -tv be- F)l~(f't'l WI Vtc,{ rJ VI.F:> tl v-c. (tA,lrYe Hi-'i' 01ICl,,') doo..- ~V>1. p,,'ck />.-.1 '7 () . J .~v-~ +. . . . Golden Valley Variance The lot is located on the NE corner of Western Avenue and Ridgeway Road. The corner lot 35' setback supports safety and clear lines of site for street traffic; however, they negatively impact buildable square feet. Our home is setback per Golden Valley ordinances. We did choose to orientate the home to the year of the property for two reasons: 1. Maintain the corner visibility with children in the neighborhood 2. Existing landscaping to support engineering draining concerns made the area not usable for family activity. Currently we have a variance for the existing deck on the east (defined as rear) side of our home. The variance is necessary as the corner lot ordinance creates a 26' rear setback, just 9 feet short of a corner lot requirement. The deck today extends 10 feet into the 26' setback, maintaining a setback larger than the 15' side setback on the north (defined as side) of our home. We desire to convert 3' ofthe decks south side and add 10' more parallel to the home for a 3 season_porch while maintaining the existing 16' (variance approved) setback on the east side of our home. Existing ordinances create a situation where the rear setback on our home is 65% large than the side. Based on our lot orientation and existing ordinances we are only allowed 21 to 25% (2,700 sq. feet) of buildable space on a lot that is approximately 12,700 square feet in size. Contrast that to a square lot that is 20% smaller (99' x 99') not orientated on a corner.. Based on existing ordinances the lot has 33% (3,300 square feet) of buildable space, with significantly less green space. Our request maintains the front visibility, does not further encroach on the existing variance and leaves 70% green space. Respectfully submitted, ! Byron and Debra Wieberdink 6. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: t---""'" ",' ./ ;.V 9-.' Signatu \, of owner < . _ ~~~J\ , /' ,. , . . l ." '. .... .'. . .;A Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. A brief statement of the hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs,or other evidence, if appropriate. You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. __ Variance application fee, as follows: $_~_25 - single family residential; $2~5 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of Clny possible effect the granting of thrs variance could have on your property. You will also be eeiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. rint Name ... j(l/e,~f? (,JiIJr/c:h /y? Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature int Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name emment Signature ') \$\\\ e\ ~~ <l=~5€f"~\ q \ ,aft- 1\ . , '~.. ~ (J Address~"tl\5 v.(~,,~ . .~V-/ Address ---1~b5 ~I,J~ ~~/ C' ~j ft"th"6\ -,13 Db t<. / her-lsu V1 ~~~115 - r eJ I vYl "'".\ tFt-},l (l.ilL L -( op( K~l4{~ Address Address 70 (, ~ O<7\Tf'.- J "15 /:. J D \ 0<- .. . ()7< ;"c, e 11 r~J\r <.. ..... Address~S C--&Qh)~\k Address . . . Established in 1962 INVOICE F.B.NO. SCALE: NO. 71884 1007-41 1 " 20' LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560....3522 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55428 o Denotes Iron Monument o Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only ~urUf'yorz BYRON WIEBERDINK ill f'rtifi ra if' xOOO.O Denotes Existing pevotion (QO~~ Denotes Proposed Elevation .. Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Property located in Section 32, Township 118, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota Address:7400 Western Ave. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building l2J(iSt- 1119 COf1dit' 10l1S ~ rf ?> ~ 0') . (j , tf I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L___________________ B:>'H.t:>~ll Cl' .... ...> *1 ~Tf'll '.)1,:' 11 ~,J,.:ll t --- --- 50. 00 -.;.-- ........ --- \) ....... .,d<tl . ".ea. ."! 4;. 4 .., . 4' 4'<1 '" . od,<I'. . '4 . .4 ~ . ,,'. '.4 <1 , " . .... . " ,,, ? '. ,d' Wes tern A venue Lot 3, Block 1, SIRNY ADDITION The only easements shown ore from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and. correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 9th day of June 2005. Rev Drown By g. J1~ -,fl1 /~(/, Lv&:L .. I / "" iI, 1 / A' / ) ( ~ 1 / \_A---v,,",(.J...., Signed File Name 50-3-1 fb 100741 inv71884.dwg Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 or Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 2499 The only easements shown are from plats of record or information proviqed by client. We hereby certify that this is a true, and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of 011 buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by LIS this 9th day of June 2005. Rev' Drawn By :J..Al~ ~ rf ~ ~ .G~) fi( Established in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560~3093 Fax No. 560-.3522 INVOICE F.B.NO. SCALE: NO. 71884 1007~41 1 " 20' Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 o Denotes Iron Monument o Denotes Wood. Hub Set for excavation only g,ururynrz BYRON WIEBERDINK QIrrtifirutr xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation @O~~ Denotes Proposed Elevation .. Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades ore subject to results of soil tests. . Proposed building informotion must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Property located in Section 32, Township 118, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota Address:7400 Western Ave. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Pro '/JOSe etCo netif; OnS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L__________________ L;> ,!:;.r.'I)U7~ll .tl~Tf:lI,}I:.H! ~t1..1 t.L --- --- --- so. 00 ..;....,.:.;...- ........ (J --.... ~ :<1. ~ .q. ~ ~. . 41, ..,. .'4' " . .a "! .~ . ~ . 'fl' " Western .~ A venUe Lot 3, Block 1, SIRNY ADDITION ('IU/\ t . /1 Sfgned .~ !{k .I / (' / I ) ( I / ,.:<'L.~ File Nome Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. .No. 21753 or Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 50-3-1 fb 1 00741 inv71884.dwg