The URL can be used to link to this page

09-27-05 BZA Agenda e e e Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, September 27,2005 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - July 26, 2005 II. The Petitions are: 611 Sumter Avenue South (05-09-19) Lonnv Phernetton, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 24 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 11 ft. at its closest point to the north yard (front) property line. Purpose: To allow for a 3-season porch addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd.10(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 30 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 5 ft. at its closest point to the north yard (front) property line. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance. 4920 Normandy Place (05-09-20) Peter Lenaah, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 7.3 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 27.7 ft. at its closest point to the south yard (front) property line. Purpose: To allow for an open front porch addition. 1613 Independence Avenue N. (05-09-21) Thomas Menard, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 11(A)(1) Accessory Structure Location Requirements . The proposed garage would not be located wholly to the rear of the principal structure as required. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage. . Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(c) Side Yard Setback Requirements . 2.1 ft. off the required 6.1 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point to the north yard (side) property line. Purpose: To allow for an addition on the northwest corner of the house. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(0) Cornices and Eaves Requirements . .5 ft. off the allowed 3.6 ft. to a distance of 3 ft. at its closest point to the north yard (side) property line. Purpose: To allow the cornices and eaves on the northwest corner of the house to go into the setback area. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(2) Rear Yard Setback Requirements . 17.46 ft. off the required 27.46 ft. to a distance of 10ft. at its closest point to the west yard (rear) property line. e Purpose: To allow for an addition on the northwest corner of the house. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(2) Rear Yard Setback Requirements . 18.46 ft. off the required 27.46 ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point to the west yard (rear) property line. Purpose: To allow for an addition on the south side of the house. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(C) Structure Width Requirements . 2ft. off the required 22 ft. to a width of 20 ft. Purpose: To allow for the existing home to be narrower than required. 3000 Noble Avenue North (05-09-22) Christine Slater. Applicant e Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 O(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements 2 e e e . 11 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 24 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Elmdale Road Purpose: To allow for an attached garage addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd.10(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 26 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Elmdale Road Purpose: To allow for a kitchen "bump out" addition Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd.10(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements . 13 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 22 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Elmdale Road Purpose: To allow for an open front porch addition. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment 3 ,~ I . . . '!' Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 26, 2005 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. McCarty called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Members Duff, Landis, McCarty and Sell and Pia Commission Representative Waldhauser. Also present were Directo Development Mark Grimes, Planning Intern Kristin Gonzalez and Assistant Lisa Wittman. I. Approval of Minutes - June 28, 2005 Waldhauser referred to page two, paragraph six a the visual impact of the front porch be clarified. MOVED by Sell, seconded by Waldhauser the June 28, 2005 minutes with the abo d unanimously to approve II. The Petitions are: 209 Meadow Lane James Mossber Request: Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Setback ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 7.7 ft. at its closest . t to the north side yard property line. To allow for a garage addition. ned that the applicant is proposing to add a second garage stall with ve, onto his existing single stall garage. The proposed addition would be et from the north side yard property line. Waldhauser noted that the proposed second level addition looks like it is set in a small amount above the first level. Gonzalez agreed and explained that the applicant is planning on using the existing load bearing wall and that the proposed second level addition does meet setback requirements, it is just the proposed new garage stall that requires the variance. Grimes noted that the applicant was not present and stated that the Board has heard variance requests in the past without the applicant being present. Duff asked if there is . ( . . . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 26, 2005 Page 2 any procedure for dismissing without prejudice or something along those lines. Grimes said that one option would be to table the request until next month. Duff said he would feel uncomfortable hearing from the neighbor who was present at the meeting if the applicant is not present. Grimes called the applicant to see if he was planning on attending this meeting. The Board decided to have the applicant call in and talk to him via speakerphone. James Mossberg, applicant (via speakerphone) stated that currently garage on his tuck under home that has a 6 foot high garage door. drives a van and it does not fit in the existing garage. He said he two stall garage, coming in from the opposite side so he is 100 that. McCarty asked the applicant if he feels the hardship is single stall garage with a 6 foot door. Mossberg said yes. Grimes reiterated that the proposed second story add requirements. Mossberg agreed and stated that . about the house being so large next to his hous looking down on his house. He stated that after concerns he changed his plans by pullin away from the property line and by tak' house. He explained that the propos the north because he is going to properties, adding more green garage. ee e setback north had concerns ere c Id be windows the neighbor about his art of the addition back, s that would look at his . for both him and his neighbor to e r Inage area between the two the cars off his driveway and into the Duff asked the applicant application. Mossbe sta driveway and that h ~ Duff asked the . tree and tote but the I of the maple tree he referred to his it is located about 20 feet (south) from the edge of the void damaging it. cted any other designs because of the location of the maging it. Mossberg stated that he did consider other plans rage even closer to the property line. re is going to be room under the existing house to install a 7 foot ossberg explained that the grade will be decreased a little bit where will be so that it will fit properly. Sell asked the applicant if he is proposing a 7 foot high door or a 6 foot, 6 inch door. Mossberg said he is proposing a 7 foot high door. McCarty opened the public hearing. Todd Carsen, 201 Meadow Lane South, stated that he has concerns about this proposal and that he has expressed some of his concerns to the applicant. He stated that he moved from Minneapolis to Golden Valley 12 years ago and he loves his neighborhood and the spaciousness of it. He said when he first heard about the applicant's proposal he . . . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 26,2005 Page 3 was adamantly opposed to it and very upset because it would be much more imposing than it currently is. He stated that the applicant's house sits higher than his and even now when he looks out his bedroom window he sees the applicant's garage, main level and an upper level so it is already almost a three story structure. He stated that he was told by City Staff that the Board of Zoning Appeals has been lenient in granting variances to allow second garage stalls into side yard setback areas. He asked if this is the City's policy and said if it is, he might have to think differently about this proposal. He said he bought his house with a one car garage knowing the city's setback requirements and the applicant bought his house with a one stall garage knowing the city's se requirements and there are a number of houses in their neighborhoo garages. He stated that he has a list of things that he would like to make sure that what the applicant has said is actually what hapR McCarty explained that the City has had the view that a on hardship but that applications still need to be reviewed on a decisions are made.as a Board on whether or not to t pe the case he hopes it is consistently done, because he may want to expand someday too. He said he wi'tevat and have the applicant say yes or no to them to ke s project. If, a is and that said if that is sta arage that he his list of concerns tentions with this Duff said that if the idea is for Mr. Cars and wants the petitioner to agree wi could somehow suggest that the He explained that if the Board g parameters. He said he did ' independently enforce a ries of understands he has , that could be misleading and ound each particular concern laid out. it will be within certain specific e the i pression that the City will somehow tered into by these two parties. ance is granted it is granted based on the specific . nce application. In this case an application has been is going to be constructed and that is what the that if an applicant would try and build something t is approved by the Board, the Inspections Department ot what the variance was granted for. M dis is cle of the m variance. en if the applicant's drawings represent what he and the applicant aid he believes it does but he would still like to go over his list so he at is being proposed. McCarty stated that his concerns would be a part ut that they wouldn't necessarily be a condition of approval of the Carsen said that he appreciates Mossberg's consideration and read his list of concerns which are as follows: 1) The living. space part of the addition will conform to setback requirements. 2) There will be no windows on the north side of the addition and the garage space facing his property. . . . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 26, 2005 Page 4 3) The living space of the addition will consist of a walk-in closet and a bathroom as shown on the plans. 4) The roof over the garage will have a slanted roof so as not to have a deck or outdoor living space on top of it. S) The roof of the garage will have gutters installed for run-off and will be properly positioned to direct water away. 6) The garage part of the addition will have siding, not just be cement block. 7) The existing asphalt driveway along the north and the east part of the addition will be replaced with grass, including some portions of his property, in order ake the swale between the two properties correct. 8) The existing asphalt driveway will be replaced and will be three e property line. 9) The .existing retaining wall in the backyard is to remain a s Grimes explained that as a part of the building permit proces control permit will be required to ensure that there are adv properties. He referred to Carsen's concerns about th that the City doesn't have much control over chal stated he was talking about the initial constructi" havin submitted. He asked if the variance approval sa no win means forever, or if someone could rip 0 d that if someone applied for a permit in wouldn't be able to if the variance is erosion n neighboring the ition and stated s in a house. Carsen con to the plans s on the north side if that in a window. Sell stated window on the north side they indows as a condition. McCarty asked Mossberg if he ~ Mossberg said yes and add wall it will be cedar shake show. ..d design addresses Carsen's concerns. w ga~Jge addition will not be a concrete block tated that he intends to do what his drawings Sell stated that he i comfortable wi this complete and hbor came to voice his concerns and that he is ffeels that everything in the application packet is d. - by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to approve e required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 7.7 ft. at its closest point to roperty line to allow for a garage addition. The noted hardship is the t currently has a single-stall garage. III. A. Discuss memo from Mayor Loomis regarding revisions to City Code and Council Guidelines Related to Boards and Commissions. The Board discussed some of the various revisions to the City Code regarding Boards and Commissions. McCarty asked if the proposed revisions were adopted in June as stated in the Mayor's memo. Grimes stated that they haven't been adopted yet. Duff stated that he doesn't see any problems with any of the proposed revisions. . . . Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 26,2005 Page 5 McCarty referred to the Board of Zoning Appeals by-laws and suggested that staff go through them, update them and bring them back to the Board. Duff asked how often they are supposed to review their by-laws. McCarty stated he t~ought it was every three years. Waldhauser stated that she thinks it's common for boards to review their by-laws once a Year. B. Envision Charge to Commissions Duff said when he thinks about Envision and how it appl.ies to the B they are very tightly applying and assessing zoning ordinances. H s one area the BZA may be able to comment on is when they see e resistance to an ordinance such as the fence ordinance or in se 0 garages where most of the houses in a neighborhood may all ga es and then every house would have a hardship. Grimes stated that ent changes made to the zoning code were made as a result of the g nning Commission with neighborhood concerns or things th anged. Waldhauser explained that the Planning Commi defined neighborhoods and then they could 0 t them what they think, but that sounds lik sense if the neighborhood had a vote. covenants in place in Golden Valle~ ked out having well rhood association and ask and that would only make ere are some private Duff stated that he appreciated said that he thinks there is s article in the recent city newsletter and disseminating zoning information. McCarty stated that he t looking for ways to po port back to the Council that they are still .0'$__- Grimes sugges Council about granted. comm .r the Board reports back to Planning Commission or v en throughout the year and the variances they've aybe there is some way they could then report that to the IV s adjourned at 8 pm. , , . 05-09-19 611 Sumter Avenue South . LonnyPhernetton, A.pplicant . . . . Hey Planning " 763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: September 27, 2005 Golden Valley Board. of Zoning Appeals To: From: Kristin A Gonzalez, Planning Intern Subject: 611 Sumter Ave.S. LonnyPhernetton, Applicant Lonny Phernetton owns the house and property at 611 Sumter Ave South. The. applicant is requesting. two variance from Section.11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1),. Front Yard Setback, in order to construct a 3-seasonsporch off his home and bring the home into conformity. A survey was required to obtain information regarding the existing structures on the property. The current house is within 5 feet from the north property line and proposed 3-seasons porch addition to the house will bring it to within 7 feet of the north side property line. There has been a long standing issue of where the north property line is located. The. home currently sits on lots 23 and 24, but the property once included lot 22. All three lots were platted to be 50 feet along Sumter Ave. The property files show that in the early 1960's the property was reviewed and the property actually had 137.8 ft along Sumter Ave, which would bring the north property line 12.2ft south. Lot 22 is now separate from lot 23 and 24, and has 50 feet along Sumter Ave,. which decreased Mr. Phernetton's property to 87.2 ft along Sumter Ave. Because there was a conflict between what the City found and what the property owner believed the lot size. was, the City decided to pay the owner for an easement for the north 12.2 ftof lot 24. . The easement is for roadway purposes. This easement was obtained within the last couple of years as part of the Laurel Ave improvements. This change in the northern property line brings the home to 5 ft at it closest point to the roadway easement. The City has a policy and considers a roadway easement the same as a street right-ot-way. The applicant mentions a few hardships with this property. The first is the .fact he liVes on a corner lot and therefore has two front yard setback. The proposed porch would not stick out farther then the current garage. Also, due to the layout of the house, this is the best and only location for a 3-seasons porch. This is the side the door is on and on the other side is where there is already existing windows. The project requires a variance from the following City Code: · Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)( 1), Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the required tront yard setback shall be 35 feet from any tront property line along a street right-of-way . . . line. The requested variance is for 30 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 5 ft. at its closest point to the side property line. · Section 11.21, Subd.10 (A}(1),Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the required front yard setback shall be 35 feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. The requested variance is for11 ft. off the required 35 ft. to.a distance of 24ft. at its closest point to the side. property line. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1951. No other major additions have been made to the house since that time. f I I s:ao m ~ - -". ~. "- .~. - .....: - .~- LAueL Ave". IlOO 642 I In J i 123 116 I i 7R 143 ~__~>~iCh.olllll~ms . (I n2 mID not 648 116 - I {I) ~ 'C t i I f ! 1 I \ .I ~ kJ C). \'- ~ . ,~ ,.) \. l~ ~ ~~ 't ~{l l . . -... ~~~~ .11'::-~;:~ ;: . . ..... ... .CE..T.FICATE OF SURYEY \' . "tri"For GU.:N BROWN 'cJ to- ~ ",. , i4l.~/k?EL // Vi? N' L-"~E.;:- 23 151.7'; {of' , JirE' 0o~ Qi't ~dJ.....-M< ' ~('Y" .. ?2 , O\!.t,f,.q) .~'" ..~. ~b~,\~ ~. .\V-'DV rf' 1.P \<' oil .. ...' ,'tE', . WE HERESY CERTIFY THAT ft.U a 18 A TRUE"ANO'CORRECT"LAT OFA SURVe:YSF LOT8 22,' 23 AND 24, BLOCK " CoNFERANO E:,ncK8oN BOULEVARD GARDENS: A8SURVEYED SYU.8 orHI829TH DAy 0,. AuIilV8T. '956. . ScALE: ,It _ JOI EGAN, F'ELD & NOWAK SURVEYORS , "-r---- , . r ' -- 4. 5. . City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoni'lgCode Variance Application 1. Street address of property involved in this application: G /I 5 UYY\- -I- ~ y- 4\1 ~ ~D v-l- h 2. Applicant: L onrtf LPhe rYJ e Yon Name I (p II .5uWl kr At/~ .$GD rJen \Jo.II~" /t;r;hJ1 S"sY. ~ ' Address '. i ..City!Slate/Zip ., (P1:J~(P71-d7'?S- 71/J3-&tn-1o 5CaS- Business Phone Home Phone Cell Phone E;a~~d~J.~s~R.ern~ileJ.1tLA)\A?F}' (0 rn Detailed description of buildipg(s),addition(s), and alteration(s)involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. ~ Pi!- Ci +4-mL hC!-d (3 ,<jeQ3on ~orchJ , A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions.for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 5 ee Ci +-I-a ch eeL To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and-correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted; is not taken within one year, the variance expires. ~......~ . nat~PPlicant , - t6. If the. applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: .. .. L.""-l ph ~"I'\d-+ OVl.- Print Nam of owner . . '............~ ~OfQ ner.\/- ~ Variance Application Submittal: Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance appHcant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the. signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain. these signatures,. youy/i11 need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you · have. attempted to contact a pr()pertyowner on two separate occasions and not found them .at. . home, you may simply write something to the ~effect"made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the tim.e and place 'of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of .At possible effect the g. ranting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ~eiving a written notice informing you of the time and plate of the variance meetihg. . r f By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project,not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or oth~r ~:::::::eregzgl:!:ct ..~..~lb::-- .. - l Comment Signature Address Print Name A!U\lVVI; 6 'fOV./\'!~Gf\r!J Comment ()\< Signature Print Name Comment Signature .intName Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature .tName.. Comment Signature 11.1mN\~...~ Address A'fV\'Iw"G-RerJ O\,-- M-~ ~......~ Address Address Address Address Address ']m(W~ lolt:5 StM~...~S. 5..2' 'S~~S. . . . Lonny L. Phemetton 611 Sumter Avenue South (Comer of Sumter and Laurel) Golden Valley, Minnesota 55343 763-607-6365 City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Septeniber29,2005 DearBoard of Zoning Appeals, I am writing in order to attain a variance so I can build a 3-season porch on the back of my house. It is my understanding that I cannot build within 35. feet of my property line without this variance. This was brought to my attention when. trying to apply for a building permit. Hardships: 1.) My fIrst hardship is that I live on a comer. Even though I have a large lot the porch would be within . the 35-foot area. Given this fact,! still would not be building beyond a present structure (garage). (See pictures) 2.) Another hardship is that I cannot build the other direction due to existing windows on both the upstairs and basement, The door that exits to the back is also on the proposed porch side. 3.) There has also been someanibiguity over the property line created by the previous. owner. This.was somewhat settled (whew!) during the Golden Valley Pavement Project but may still be part of the equation. (See legal documents enclosed. Drainage, utility, roadway easement) Sincerely, Lonny L. Phemetton \A 'I- \'1' . . . DRAINAGE, UTILITY, ROADWAY AND WALKWAY EASEMENT This Easement granted this day of single, ("Grantor") in favor of City of Golden Valley, ("Grantee") . , 2004, by Lonny L. Phemetton, a Minnesota. municipal corporation WHEREAS,. Grantoristhe fee owner of certain real property legally described as: Lots 23 and 24, Block l,.'Confer and Erickson's Boulevard Gardens", Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, Grantor wishes to grant to Grantee a non-exclusive easement for the installation and maintenance of drainage, utilities, roadway and walkway across a certain portion of the Servient Property. NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, received from Grantee, does hereby agree as follows: 1. Grantor does hereby grant and convey unto Grantee, its successors and assigns a permanent, non-exclusive and appurtenant easement for the installation and maintenance of drainage, utilities, roadway and walkway across that portion of the Servient Property described as: Commencing at a point in the West line of Lot 24, Block 1, Confer and Erickson's Boulevard Gardens~ 87.8 f~et North of the Southwest comer of Lot 23, Block I, Confer and Eiic~son's Boulevard Gardens, thence East to a point in the East line of said Lot 24, distant 88.2 feet North of the Southeast comer of said Lot 23, and the~e terminating. 2. Grantor hereby reserves unto himself, his heirs and assigns, the right to use the said easement for other purposes not inconsistent with the rights granted to Grantee under this easement agreement. , . . .. . 3. Grantor will defend, indemnify and hold Grantee harmless from and against all actions, causes of action , claims, costs, damages, expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and expert and other fees and expenses), fines, judgments, liens, penalties, obligations, and suits arising out of, relating to or resulting from Grantor's, his agents, representatives, licensees, and invitees, and his successors and assigns use of the easement, except for the negligence or misconduct of Grantee, its employees, board members, agents, representatives, licensees, and invitees, and its successors and aSSIgns. 4. Grantee will defend,. indemnify and hold Grantor harmless from and against. all actions, causes of action, claims, costs, damages, expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and expert and other fees and expenses), fmes, judgments, liens, penalties, obligations, and suits arising out of, relating to or resulting from Grantee's, its employees, agents, representatives, licensees, and general public, and its successors and assigns use of this easement, except for the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, his agents and/or invitees, and his successors and assigns. 5. Grantee agrees that it shall pay for the cost of the design. and installation. of the sidewalk and retaining wall, including maintenance and snow removaL 6. . The.Grantor,his heirs, successors or assigns and the . Grantee from time to. time will execute, acknowledge and deliver such further assurances of the Easementas 111aybe necessary, convenient or desirable for the purposes of the clarifying, better locating, releasing or further defining the nature, extent and location of the Easement. [THE NEXTP AGE IS THE SIGNATUREP AGES TO BE EXECUTED IN COUNTERPARTS] . .. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this Easement to be executed as of the date first written above. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN } SS. Lonny L. Phemetton The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of Lonny L. Phemetton, single, Grantor, ,2004, by Notary Public .' . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantee has caused this Appurtenant EasemenUobe executed as ofthe date first written above. City of Golden Valley By Its Mayor By Its City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA } ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -'- dayof , 2004, by Linda R. Loomis, the Mayor and Thomas D. Burt, City Manager of the City of Golden Valley, . a Minnesota municipal. corporation on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public This instrument drafted by: Best & Flanagan LLP (MVP) 4000 First Bank Place 601 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402-4331 ~. . . Scheduling Construction Preconstruction o Obtain permits. ~\\ ~"-o o Order materials with long delivery dates. Foundation o Prepare site. o Dig holes and get inspection. o Pour footings. Completion of Shell (Exterior) o Ameriprise e Financial GOfher I .t:/= S""O'f. ~.~ I J>-~ AV~1I5r II =-=....=-:....""::..-=.---- ........- . ... el.-I'\,,"~O ro"+' g./Il.. . \ i \ 'Trus':a Ai-L.... if 11- 3.1h.- 161 t L ~~, jl~ub \,~ /iVc..ll ~ ~ .. ~ Sol" . Z 0 '- ~\wY ..-.~ - b~ . \ pa-H ) Ro.l \ '. s"--uil..... 11/... ~ ~'\ 5k..~~.'d ~~ CSB \\ Slo....~ ~ Tr Co D~ ~ . t', j', i : 'i ~~.... :11>> r ,~ fI...:(k~r- b.,~~....-- ~1t.~....~U "., "I ,))r b \ \ ; \ /P' I.. clv \ i'o'#-d VClor <r f6~{\ tr?-, "....c, , .&,' , " I (, , I t,'}" L f7Q ~~ ..::ro~ ..-\-, I' ,. 02k/O I ~'O c: , ,I ,,, POz.f {,~ .(p jt... "'4 F't>" L~() '> /"2.. "i-..lo.. kk 'Z.I{ oJto-ro~ t 'f ch... .. CS" ~ . <"'f> " &t.o.1I\o\. ,;).. - .:J >do Gr044..... Tf'l4A.+- ~ .~ ...{;~ .'. ~,,~ \.. """-- ~ (~ ,.,' b II Surnt-~r' AVe . .' (,\' Su.,-nt-er Ave . b" 5 uyy)t~ Ave . 6l\ Su~+ey Ave . . Sumtev Ave bl J Sumtev Ave . , ,4 . 05-09-20 4920 Normandy Place . Peter Lenagh, Applicant , . " " . lIey Planning 763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: September 27, 2005 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Kristin A Gonzalez, Planning Intern Subject: 4920 Normandy Place Peter Lenagh,Applicant Peter Lenagh owns the house and property at 4920 Normandy Place. The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1), Front Yard Setback, in order to construct an open front porch addition. A survey was required to obtain information regarding the existing structures on the property. . The proposed open front porch addition to the house will bring it to within 27.7 feet of the north side property line. The code also states that an owner can build an open front porch 30 feet from the property line. With that, Mr. Lenagh's proposed design would be 2.3 feet over that exception. The applicant states that his hardship is the fact the house is 33.8 feet from the property line. Mr. Lenagh states that because of this, he cannot build a front porch. The existing garage was built in 1950 and is located 4.6 feet from both the side and rear yard property lines. The Code allows accessory structures that were built before 1982 to be located no closer than three feet of the rear and side yard property lines. The project requires a variance from the following City Code: · Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1), Front Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the required front yard setback shall be 35 feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. The requested variance is for 7.3 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 27.7 ft. at its closest point to the side property line. . . A review of the City file indicates thatthe house was built in 1948. The property has had a few additions over the years. In 1950, a garage was constructed in the back left part of the lot. Then in 1960, the owner added on a family room and bath. Another addition, meant to be a family room, was added in 1970.. No other major additions have been made to the house since . that time. 5051 294S 2931 2RS 2913 2901 ~___'~iC}\OOlSGlS_ . 4900 3125 3115 48Z4 3101 302Ii 3025 , Subject Property I ",0 3016 3013 2944 294S ZHZ 2:M3 ZNO 2Mt lit U3t 2937 5 i 1924 2RS ! 2f11Z 2913 Z900 2901 ~..... lit ! c I 31AO 3124 3114 3100 302Ii 3Ol4 JIIOO ZMG ZNZ 2940 U3t 2f11Z Z900 FRONT LEFT Design I Quality DAVID SCHWEICH CONST. 21716 KENRICK AVE. LAKEVILLE, MN. 55044 PHONE: (952)469-3222 FAX: (952)469-3920 L1C.# 20262622 www.bruce@david$chweichconstruction.com I i I , ! I I I I I I I I PLANS FOR: I Peter Lenagh I 4920 Normandy Place II Golden Valley, MN 55422 ; I' 763-529-6047 . ---l , IP- 51 i l__J I Service Trust David Schweich Cpnst assumes n9 respoosibility fur structural pr dimnsiooal ermrs ()f omissioos. The cpntractur and I or h9fn& owner must verify and check all notes. dimenskms. detailS. elevations. sectioos and ncor plans prior to the start 01 coostruclion and be respoosible for the same. II II Ii i! II II II II II \1 I! ,I ii li It ,I I' ,i II II I' I I I II I I i! I PROPOSED PORCH b I <0 12'-0" 20'-0" 45'-0" 3'-4" b I b '<:t NEW SIDEWALK Design 1 Quality DAVID SCHWEICH CaNST. 21716 KENRICK AVE.. LAKEVILLE, MN. 55044 PHONE: (952)469-3222 FAX: (952)469-3920 L1C.# 20262622 Service Trust Date: 06120/05 David Schweich Const assumes no responsibility for structural or dimnsional errors or omissions. The contractor and I or home owner must verify and check all notes. dimensions. details. elevations. sections and floor plans prior to the start of construction and be responsible for the same. PLANS FOR: Peter Lenagh 4920 Normandy Place Golden Valley, MN 55422 763-529-6047 ININ'N. bruce@davidschweichconstruction.com P- 4 City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address of property involved in this application: 4920 Normandy Place 2. Applicant: Peter Lenaah Name 4920 NormandY Place Golden Valley. MN 55422-3003 Address City/State/Zip Business Phone 763-529-6047 Home Phone 763-670-6048 Cell Phone Email Address PeterLenaah@comcast.net 3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. LeJ-f ~ '+- G,~/y Z.O p~ ..J L~.f <6' '5!t,ct 7 w,,()~w.... ~"..~ -I' v--" 1'\' (1 r-('\L I !~O {,~ }'" ( -,' v 20' ! j 11\ f \ ~\'" 1,j~!1 rL ,(, H \- 'f--:'f\ ." J ~,I I 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. f)~~ +0 ~ ke-.J Y-L I..OrA.$~ 1$ ~3~ q:d +T'OvtA. ~ ,::>".t'~ '":11_,.4/ /, V\~. r Ce. V1 041:/'1 buttl ~ f;f1~-I >',.d._ ( I / . ' f 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. . " By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. rintName E-f~C;' 6uJel\ Ct>^7~M ~ u S Comment Signature Print Name .mment Signature tr.Jo . 1 ;j~J 0~ Address WOO xhr~a'tV ik~ Address 2q qo C/J~o ~L r Address 4~ 21 T;~~ '"' .~. ~ 19 ~ v"[ llecy ,>"ItJ $)12Z Address . '-\~2.0 AhYYYl~no\~ \>l . L.\92.0 Noy-mcmo\'j PL . y <) 2.0 Ncw"(Y'G\ nd.'j ~L . . lAND SURVEYORS 347-21 . -- ~ c Z l'l o ." 5 -l Z\ 0' -...1-" .N (jl(O -'" w-...1 ~-...1 ~, : \ ~ Existing House #4930 . \ \ \ ... o (". 1+ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ -- -- CERT/FICATE.OF SURVEY Survey for: PETER LENAGH " 'H 770'}.1'33 S __77.24-- ---....... \ \ \ I -- ,(j) \0 -" -...1 ~ci Y'o ~ w COO , 0: \(T1 /' _/ . ---- -- -- Existing House #4900 \ \ I I I I I I I I I VI !Xl -l>- ft- I I I I i --1- ...... - Retaining Wall ...1 , . . :./:::::.:::: ..... -''''.;. . .-:~. ;~-~.;. _15.1...- N SCALE: 1" = 20' . Denotes Iron Monument Found o Denotes Iron Monument Set DESCRIPTION: Lot 7 & Easterly 200 feet of Lot 8u SIock 7, WOODLAWN PARK ~.. '. 1f. . :. ~.:JI. "'!. . frof69"J oren .(1.x:rtt f'c((h VI ?l .... Yard ~ VI VI ~ \ \ \ \ \ I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I om 0 registered land surveyor under the lows of the State of Minne a. Doted ..~.l~~a;,{; _AugUst, 2005. ~;;~~~N. INC. .r:: R,j,.t.~-:~~~: / Tele. No. (952) 888-2084 Minnesota License No. 9018 U'Jh I 1);'\ I \ \ \ \ .-" -: :-..; . ~ L==75.0 R==587 ..02.. D.==701916 ...... . .. " '. t.~?:..i:.-. J,ttfb\...'~.'; NORMANDY PLACE . . i -~ , f' . 05-09-21 1613 Independence Avenue North . Thomas Menard, Applicant . -<. ~J Cl) ~--~>~lCH.oGllil(li$a:m . 1716 1111 1113 NAPER ST ~" -" "" - ~'w ~'" c,,_, 1700 1101 1636 9345 1G36 ~,eR 51 1i132 11m 1630 Z "' 1629 I 1628 1628 1629 I 1624 1624 1625 1624 1625 ~ 1622 1621 1620 1621 I 1620 z i ~ ! 1616 1616 1611 ~ 1616 -< J Subject Property ... 1612 ~ Z Z 16118 1609 16IIB 1609 1608 t604 1605 1604 1605 1t04 lI450 1601 l600 1601 9200 1112 1104 1105 i ! 153% 9405 -< ... ~ Z 1528 1S29 1524 1520 15%1 1516 1511 1512 15U l10t " . . . Hey Planning 763..593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: September 27,.2005 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Kristin A Gonzalez, Planning Intern Subject: 1613 Independence Avenue N. Thomas Menard, Applicant Thomas Menard owns the house and property at 1613 Independence Avenue N. The applicant is requesting several variances for home additions and a new garage. The variances are from Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(1), Accessory Structure Location; Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(3)(c), Side Yard Setback; Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (D) Cornices and Eaves; Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(2), Rear Yard Set Back; Section 11.21, Subd.1 O(C) Structure Width and Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(2) , Rear Yard Setback. A survey was required to obtain information regarding the existing structures on the property. The proposed location of the garage would be located in front bf the house. The applicant is requesting a variance from the accessory structure location guidelines. The applicant is also proposing two additions to the home. Because of the current location of the home, both additions would need variances. The first addition is to bump out the northwest corner of the house, no farther then the current exterior walls. This will bring the structure within 4 ft. of the side yard property line, within 10ft. ofthe rear yard property line, and with the cornices and eaves it would bring the structure within 3 ft. from the property line. The other proposed addition is to the south side of the house, and would bring the structure within 9 ft. of the rear property line. The existing house is14 ft. wide. After the proposed bump but of the northwest corner of the house is constructed the home will be 18 ft. wide. The zoning code requires homes in the R-1 zoning district to be at least 22 ft. in width therefore a variance is required. The applicant states that his hardship is the placement of the house. The home is currently 2 ft. too close to the north lot line and 17 feet too close to the west lot line. He also states the home has no garage now. The project requires variances from the following City Code requirements: · Section 11.21, Subd. 11 (A)(1), Accessory Structure Location. City Code states a detached accessory structure shall be located completely to the rear of the principal structure, unless it is built with frost footings. In that case, an accessory structure may be built no closer to the front setback as the principal structure. -1 .' . . . If an addition is built on to an existing principal structure that would create a situation where an existing garage or accessory structure would not be completely to the rear of the addition to the principal structure, the addition to the principal structure may be built and the existing garage or accessory structure may remain and be considered conforming as long as there is at least 10 feet of separation between the existing principal structure with the addition and the existing garage or accessory structure. Additions may be made to the existing garage or accessory structure as long as the 10 feet of separation can be met. The requested variance is because the proposed garage would not be located wholly to the rear of the principal structure as required. , , · Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(3)(c), Side Yard Setback. City Code states that in the case of lots having a width of 65 feet or less, the North or West side yard setback shall be 10 percent of the lot width, and the South or East side yard setback shall be 20 percent of the lot width (up to 12.5 feet). The requested variance is for 2.1 ft. off the required 6.1 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point to the north yard side property line. · Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (D) Cornices and Eaves. City Code states that cornices and eaves may not project more than 30 inches into a required setback. The requested variance is for .5 ft. off the required 3.6 ft. to a distance of 3 ft. at its closest point to the side property line. · Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(2), Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear yard setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. The requested variance is for 17.46 ft. off the required 27.46 ft. to a distance of 10 ft. at its closest point to the west yard (rear) property line. · Section 11.21, Subd.10 (A)(3)(c), Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. The requested variance is for 18.46 ft. off the required 27.46 ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point to the west yard (rear) property line. A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1940. In 1964, a basement was added to the house. No other major additions have been made to the house since that time. , , City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application No.. Date Received 8ZA Meeting Date Amount Received 1. 2. Applicant: Street address of property involved in this application: I to 13~T)JDt:t>EfJ DE,JC6!cJ tJ .-- I HOM/t~ M Gi'J It-~f) Name Jr.o 13 "IiJ.DePGN D~CE /)J' A.L Address Business Phone 7~3') 5 i.f 5 -' I B 31 Home Phone City/State/Zip fu(2)~/8.- 153'-1 Cell Phone Email Address 3. 4Deta~1fc:tr~tion !ft,uifi~(sr. ad~onfs).";;nJi!fe~tlbmS) involved in this pt)tition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. tN L4a..(~ fN G TW G" &, 5 r oJ G J10v) E:, 51.( S'TP.fi-I(;.J1 TblJi IJ f.:; R-. ~o ~ 110 'TVIe: N u) eo fl.. "list<, It D D I t<J (;, /7- CfrN rp-e v ~'L J-b TW~ S W/tl-L t- /1-0 DI IVv /} f4c t='" 0 VCtf_ 'rt:lt= E~t5T' NC, fi~c.1-f. [l II AS~rie'fll1t~me~f of \t\~ ~~rd~t~ ~hi~; PJ;~id~~~I;:rt~dSfu~ ti,'i:' gr~lin~ ~rih~ Jri~.fc~Ck (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. '--n;~ !-PO uSG IS Lf' MOM TIle; N ur It/'J /) 'f S 10 ' FRoM.7U E W LeI . Lor ftA-s. tJ (J (g I'rll dlP 6 4 No oJ l~ LItJ r;, (z I 'TOo Ci..O s c WIVe (J1' '700 - 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. . · ~~~O Signature of Applicant 'l By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other sta.tements regard~e prOject"..,. . ) . r1nt Name ~~,b ~&N'tJo Comment Signature Print Name ~ (\(\0- ~. \0 Z> ~s~V\ Comment . SignaturO:: cY"'C\ ~() rc.: W\ Print Name --y'cvr \< fl1o{"-e.~ Comment Signature X~/ P11~ ~ bQbS'b~ rint Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature' ~rc?~ fI Print Name Comment Signature Print Name amment Signature Lo;q L~ La/(9 ie ffi,X~5S.'r h~"~&v~ ~, ' v( .~- \ \o()S~0~~Q~-Q\(v~~ Address 1j\J '('NI\ ~ 5 4-:~ ~ /~o;rlL~ci~~df#tc ~ 4-v~ Address. Gorrle,.'l lli1l71' ~A) , .fY;rLi) M/6y~dA.~~ Addres~~ 0~ 1I.,U,fNt! 1Lda.& ..r:.R4. 7J:::Ve. . \ Address 7"de4. V.. ~ /hA;I ;;r-<.J-<.. '\V\ Address 8 . I . , . . . ~P'ElJ~ tt~ fM4iJ (rJorl.J fNbEi\lEtJ t b f ip ::r~""f)&J D~ ftV'C. rJ ~ L~,v, MN ! boB ~~ ("I.I \ iJ(.jf,v1 1- tJ. tJrrI MiN' rry--\1 r l<AIY18'1I C"{. 1AlC,@/-rM . I / LO r /2 / /, ,....- , -'( .// , , I '" I I , / "l 7- J:; _"-"'., ,-f ..,. - 'I t:/?4n-1e- I::A~~.s! 20 / ".1_ ~ _.(./ I / - J('7P~,~- 'it) 7,5' )I /, /Y'(),/p/? /-.1-/= ,,",'N~ 5 G ~'I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: Tom Menard 1613 Independence Ave. N Golden Valley, MN 55527 ). ~ ~ "< ~ Xqo~. Z "'. ...". - . '.. ..... . .,; :. $/.,I-k'/?7/~t? h'.i . " '-II: - /32/9 -586tJZP't.jNe I x I F!F/C,-~ "CO-.' SHEf) ~ 3r .S"z K I T .~~ / - ~ , I 1.....--8Mk!.Dh ~ -/37.23-J}?60ZP'Z9,/,.1 1"9~/' r- I ., E",~ . '</ - .- ( " " /- " [' , . . '-_ " i <.-:: :: .;- 1 ~ 9C(,..c /- 5 -,c /../c;w 5~-: ./' /'10.10::>0:; - I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Survevor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Surveyed by methi.th day of August, 2005. , ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ " " ,~; -1. I , \ ~.r:.?'" !~L I I ~ ... ~ ~s .//0. /~ /~ ON,c 5"n:>Jt!t,/ ~ ,..:=''pp",.>,..;&; #"'f/~~ ' .5t. .....::.- -~ J( 8'9<1-3 if) t'>.0'7 <' r- r-:, I J c.r~ "-"_ L.. l .4 !: !:/'/. l( '11>$1, " I Lot:; I ARDf;;~.3 ~sJtpp", Legal Description: Lot 5, Block 13, "LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS" HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA including adjacent one half of vacated alley. Scale: 1" = 20' o Denotes iron monument xooo.O = Existing elevation Bearings are assumed . /.:? ~ t-/ ~~.4 f7- ;r:.;"z$G,t:! Rsr;Q/,v,..../" ~.>?'./ 1 I C) ::- .J .t:'~t.;~ yt10 -;. 17 7- - , \' , ~ ~~'7t:J7&t:;. ~ ~ .~ ~I sSj ~, ~,.I .~ ,~l ~J.. ~ ----.,'. x ";,. oJ.. a',.~ 1'..../., c.,j:""t.,.,.... I ,.,~~ 5 .... .'~~,~.::.I:&c:.~~~ C!:~,r- /'O.R7?CA/' .r:.--~-:-..... -PrJ vc::' t..<-'t'J.'C-1 . -... '\ X 1~6.tJ(. - I iI '" ~ 11 ~ iI ":i- ~ :T) I '\. I ~. :\ ~ I " " ''''' 'j01.5 ~ \.;. '..: ~ I I : '9o;t. 7" -k QS_J - -"I I (1J.e.~ L:tH; k 25 Benchmark: TNH, SW, Olympia St. @ Independence A....e. 1\. N.G.V.D. 1929 adjusted elevation = 901.95 feet. 44f -;;?,L"~ Herb F. Lemire RLS Minnesota Reg. No. 13349 4416 Abbott Ave. N Robb~dale.~5422 Phone: 763.53~97 I / , ~ / '1 7- / -<; I -'-<", ~ 'foB7 --~ -,.. ".," U lOP'.::- _' 6" LJr-r/' , .:. -__. t... ,"' ... -::. 1-, .---". // , , I I / Lor/2 ----- ----- ~ 5"i/Ef) <;) 1 ' , I ~~2. 'I ;::~4n-1 e- t;;A~C::.s 20 I ,".1. /f L.<'.//7- 9c7_~ )I ,- /Yt'./ p/? I-J-p #l?q5G 2.'1 J I CERTIFICA TE OF SURVEY FOR: Tom Menard I 613 Independence Ave. N Golden Valley, MN 55527 X<1CJ$'. Z ...... ". '.. ..... . '.: :, i7d-~/77/~p #-./ ~~ -13l.Z9-.586tJgp1tPt;e I x. _ y- ~ :2..$ /'h. / d. ; ~ ON,c >J""D.t!t.';/ ~ , "- ..-'=',P..4/.17'..... 4'.:1'1/;";: 5~ Jiq'P:f: 7- :~i '/'f7-3 Fh.yt\ <:rtf , ' t:\J .../.L /)' '. -. Y("'(~lfl('-'I I ~~AT n~ -- --/)~r! , A..occ:.Ii':$/_.,)':' ..J":".. /' ~ ------ ~ I E3' /"".5 ,"-<icc.' sflCiJ '<) Sf .S'z ~~ (../~~4 tY-_ .~_ J/"19GA'! KEr",r;/#/;./c, ~!?I,,: X '\ .... '1:::7'.'7"" t'T~~ I ":::-~.~ I _ .... 24; -PI-I v'c !"<"--:~JJC-I '. ..... '\, r~1:7.& C!': ~,.q;,~R::~'.::..""/!/ ~._- ~-...;~ ~1 r - '2,/. - " I . -)' ~' .' /. ~. .' I.., . ! --8"'-1/;:!'..:;J h ./ -/37.Z3-j).p.!.o?/\,? -..- I (u{) ()(p/,f I =-.......,,;:;.:-____ -"'.,;.Y 01/,,1 , 9"/" Y .,_J c' ,_ .-' l.(/ - .~ 'I' . , I L ," 7- (., r' _, _ · ~ ~ - 1 ~ 9~(,..c 1- $ ~,c .<./""1'" - I' v.:"..;...... . /'IO.It:70J - ! Legal 'Description: Lot 5, Block 13, "LAKEVIE\\O HEIGHTS" HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA including adjacent one half of vacated alley. Scale: I"::::: 20' o Denotes iron monument xooO.o ::::: Existing elevation Bearings. are assumed . .Y tiC'7. I" ). ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- .1.:, --J -""" l'",; ~ .~ ~-""it:'i'.", " ~ ~ ~ ~ ;S l.;' ~I ~, ~ '~ ~ l,.. ~ " --- '..........1 ''', ~ qe'S".~5' X 7C6_c!C. , II -.... 11 "" ~ :1 "* :T\ , ;',; I ~" !I ~ I 5:.: " " ~ I I ..,~, I I 9~. 11,>__, -, .. - l.cUI!.:.- /.,jfiJ5 , I;K I 25" -;'::>",:' 5":; ( . Benchmark: TNH, SW, Olympia St. @ Independence Avc, K N.G.V.D. 1929 adjusted elevation == 901.95 feet. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under O1Y direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Surveyed by methisi day of Angus!, 2005. ~-!a-L~ Herb F. Lemire RLS Minnesota Reg. No. 13349 4416 Abbott Ave. N Robb~d~e,:~~422 Phone. 76.J.537W57 , , . . fl- I I <;< ~ I l_LI I.... '1' OHOU O..OU OUOU \V m - 1-'?- .2 e.O ,J. . ,J o ... o "C"J. '.~,."'..,".\.',\,'.." ... '.. , "<\1 . I 9 en , 999Z " <--I . ~l ! '" g Q; ~ 18 ~ N ~ ( .,~.,\ l (~) , \( . ) I ~. . ,"-~J l~'-' ~~ ~~ '1~ -c~-"~r~ I ' . ( /{ '. /)! f( ~j T[L-~~~ (~ ..0-.6 < ~ ~ '-~: · [(t~])J ~ ~ " '1:::::r/ ~. ... .... I I ~.o oi' I t_":'J.~_=-J - ~ Ik ..W O~. I~.< ~, i ~ L' ~ ~ '~ ~ 1-- 990t ~ ~ /" 1 // dl II ) ,I z ~/ i I Cl II I II I OSOI> 990t ~ ~ I: II II I r : : II II I ~ ~ (( i~ en 11 '---- Z Cl ..O-.O~ 9 ;,. 11 '-I c ..O~-.!H \', i j i I u :( :........ .j ~ s I I / 1 b '3 I. nck.~n cAerce Nt:... . \ b 1'3 J:Y'\cAe?enoienc..€- Ave.. . . . '6\3 I~d~n~en~ AMe . s 5e'1e'-L511...Z5b N6'.rS.:?~ :ElNI7!1n71l *~ 'S.,W..:?Jr..:?.:Y17tP..:?.:Y ..:?dY':y$ dNY "S..:?dO..? $Nfd7f17ii'dNY "S7fYDd 7Y.:Y17.t:J17.:Y.1S" SNOfSN..:?Jrfd 77Y A:::If.:Y..:?A 0.1 .<:YO.t:Jy.:Y...wO..?!7 .:Y..:?NAlO..:?JrOH >~ . :.?O{ . . ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ t!i~ ~'i\ ~, ~ " ~~ ~~ lij~ lij~ ~~ ~V\ lQ . N#' ~77YANgd709 '.a'AY.a'..?N.a'dN.a'd.a'dN.r 9ftf .a'..?Ngd.rSg~ d~YNg#, :aU/eN 13a!O,lt/ . --- :A8 N81S30 ~~ ~ " ~~ ~..~ ~~ l(j~ ..~~ ~~ ~ . h Sii'Iii'-L5/;-Z'Sb NPfSg(/' !1NI7!11J'I1I ~". . . 'S..N:7IY:7cYh&':7cY :7dYcY6J dNY "S:7d0.7tJNfd7fh8 dNY "S7fYDd 7YcYh.1:JhtY.1S"SNOfSN:7IYfd 77Y A::1'fcY:7A 0.1 .arO.l.7YcY.l1IO.7 !iT .:Y:7NAlO:7WOH ffi ffi EJg EE] EId . .N'w ~77YA N.:i"d706' '.:i"AY.:i".?N.:i"dN.:i"g.:i"dNr 9/~1 .:?.?N.:i"drS.:?.:Y d.:YYN.:?,W :aU/eN 13a!O,ltl [] . :,,8 N81S30 ~~ ~' ~ ~" ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 'i\ e-- Sel.t-~SI1-,rS6 N&.rS.;rd :ilN17an7B *~ . 'S..w.:1"Jr.:1"4'I7d'.:1"4' .:1"dY~$ dNY "S.:1"dO..? $Nfd7fl7$ dNY "S7fYEd 7Y4'I7.I.::JI74'..IS"SNOfSN.:1"Nfd 77Y A:lf4'.:1"A 0..1 .arO.I.::JY4'..wo..? ~ 4'.:1"NAlO.:1"NO# r NJ1I 'Ai177YA N5d70& -gAY g.?NgdNgdgdNf 9/Zi/ 5.?NgdrSg~ d~YNgJ1l :aUl1!N l:la/OLd :,,8 N81S30 ,- - ~ - - - -- - - - -, ~ - - - - - - - - - --1 I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ I I ~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ I I I I I 0 'I : I : I: I' I 'I :1 : ~ I: I' 10 ~ 'I :1 : CJ I: Ii i i l, Ii ~ I, ~ I ~ II ~ . :1 ~ : - ~ 1_ II. ~ I, I ~ ,~ I l I ~ I ,,~ ,oc: I I ~ ~ ~ ~, :1/' : ~ I ~ II : r-- / I ~ ~ :! I --- I ~~. L~_~-'V __=1=_ "_J ~ ,. I: :: .~.~ ~ ~. ~ :: ~ .~ '" I: : 5 ~ I ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'I ,I ,I I II I II I' I II I II II I ,I II I II I II I ,I II I " I I L ~ ~ ~ ~5- I I ~I ~I ~I I I I I _J 1< "O-,O~ 9 ~ ~ ::.1..:: "OhS~ . SZl/Zl-LSIt-.!'Sb 1V.9.TS.:i"d gNI7gn711 9 Co (") ~. I I, I I g "'I ~ f II :1 II l i I I II II I, II I) II II I: ~ "I I I' II I- II :1 I I ~ . 's.uv5ff5~nd75c:Y 5dY~9 dNY 'S.::1dO.7 9N,rd7,rne dNY 'S7,rY..Bd 7Y~n.t:Jn~.1S'SNO,rSNgN,rd 77Y A::I,r~5A 0.1 'a'O.t:JYc:Y.uvO.7 !7 c:Y5NN05NOH "O-,L~ ,,0.,8 ~ NJr 'E77YA Ngd706' :7AY g.?NgdNgd'gdNI 91tl g.?Ngd.iSgc:Y dc:YYNgJr :aUl1!N /3a!O.ltl Y'.-. .:,,-._ "O.,V -(Hrn~ oTIO~F unor=- - ~-= -=-= -1' II II I I I II ~:--- \ \ \ \ \ \ --~------r L_____ ;' 1890E I I I I I I I 890E --.,-------- -"- -1_ - - - - -"- L - I I I I Cf> Co I I I I 899l --1, rq B :;"8 NOIS30 "z o , Co l I: II I: II I: II I I II I I II 9 I: ~ ~ II I ,,_IJ I ';> Co (") ~. . ~, ~ " ~"~ ~.~, ~"~ ~....~ ~.~ ~ ~ ---------~&-- " ~.,9~ ~ SEIE-LSI1-Z'Sb N6'.TS5d 31NI731n711 *~ 'S.t1I.:1ff.:14'I7d'.:1c:Y .:1dY4'$ dNY "'S.:7'dO..? $Nfd7fnHdNY "'S7fYSd 7Y4'I7.t:JI74'.IS"'SNOrSN.:1ffrd 77Y A:7f4'.:1A 0.1 ':::YO~Y.:r'.t1IO.7 !7 .:r'.:1NNO.:1ffOH Nff ~77YA Ngd709- -gAY g.,NgdNgdgdNf 91&'1 g"NgdrSgK dKYNgff :all1l!N 13a!O,lt/ :A8 N81S30 /1 = un/! -:;'7Y:JS 7587 ./N5W5SY$ d5S0d'O~d' s - ----.\- _. '- - ,------ I' ;0 s 'I ~ - ~- -- -- -- -- -., ~"9-'L _ I ~. t · . ... ,7"""", ,l{()7,7H : M uZ'h t!1' 6'N.T..IOO:/<Y5.Td uZ'/ J ~-------- -, - \> I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I> I I l ll=_____ <1 .d ~ en '-.- ~ - - - - - - -----1 <I- I ().-. I I I I I I I> I oJ I I I I I I I> I .- - - - - - - - ,.-.' I <1_ <l- J ,,-----_._- c.. ::::> 7 J.//J ,,8-,L "l/~ 8-,L ~ >1 w ~ ~ ~ 56'JI'tYCJ.1S /1 = 'A/! -:;'7Y:JS 75A57./N5W5SY$ 6'NI.1SIX5 I I I I I I I 5'1 C') ~I I I I I I "O-,Ol _.............:. '~"- - - - - - -. - - - ~ - - -.~ - ~ - - ---,..- -.- ~ -- -.-- ,,0-,8l ,,0-,8 . . , ;1-' .f'-30 ('3,) t.AYE~S 2" .f'IGIP FOAAI 3/~ Sf/EATf/ING At.UAlINUAI SOFF.lT 1{8" CANT 2"X 8" CEIt.ING JOISTS 2~ O.C. .f'-I{I{ CEIUNG INSUt.ATION P APO,f' BA.f'.f'IE.f' 5/8" PI?YWAL.L.CEIUNG ASPf/At.T Sf/INGEt.S FEt.T PAPE.f' ICE G WATE.f' Sf/IEt.P . 1/2" Et7"E.f'IO.f' Sf/EATf/ING I" COM': AI,f'SPACE ~ ~ ~. ~ .I~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ _.~ ~ - EXPoSEP ,f'AR"E.f' TIES P.f'IP EPGE I" % G" FASCIA 2H % G" SUB FASCIA PENTEP SOFF.rT 2H X 28 SOFF.lT NAIt.E.f' 31/28 WAt.t. STUPS IG" O.C. 31/2" WAt.t. INSUt.ATION P APO,f' BA,f',f'IE.f' 1/28 PI?YIYAt.t. DOUBLE 2" X I.j" TOP PLATE 12H t.AP SIPING f/OUSE W.f'AP ('BUIt.PING PAPE.f',) 1/28 EffE.f'IO.f' Sf/EATf/ING ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ \S ~~b: ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ .~~~ \4t "\~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~RS'~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ 31/28 WAt.t. STUPS IG"O.C. 3 1/28 WAt.t. INSUL.ATION PAPO.f'BAWIE.f' I/28PI?YWAt.t. 2" X I.j" BOTTOM PLATE 3/~ T G G Pt.YI1'OOP Ft.OO,f'ING 28 X G" Ft.OO,f' JOIST IG" O.C. ,f'IAI JOIST INSUt.ATION 2" X S" RIM JOIST 1/2" EXTERIOR SHEA THING r .~ 8" X 20" COM': CONC.f'B"E roOTING .f'E-BA.f' ('2,) ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ , -. ~ ~~ ~~~~ !tt~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ .~~ Sf).~ ~~~~ Q.; ~.~ ~ ..... ..... ..... ..... 13/~ X G" t.pt. 2.0E PI28 O.C. 1'-6" .- .''''>:;/";~I'H.'(:.. I~ ... T'.I~II~;;lllln~~~~;~tl.I;:lr;";t I -111==111 III III 111- 1-111-111-111-111- ~ P,f'AINTIt.E SECTION f/IEf1/" HOUSE seAL&'- 3/8" = 1/ ;>.: co z c; CiS w o .. ~ . . 05-09-22 . 3000 Noble Avenue North Christine Slater, Applicant . .. . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 1763-593-8109 (fax) Date: September 23, 2005 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 3000 Noble N.(05-09-22) Christine Slater Christine Slater owns the house and property at 3000 Noble Ave. N. (The property is located at the northeast corner of Noble Ave. N. and Elmdale Rd. in the northeast portion of the City.) The applicant is requesting three variances from a requirement of the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21) in order to allow the construction of a new garage and expansion of living space on the south side of the house. The applicant has submitted a survey that indicates the proposed construction and the location of the existing house. The house was constructed in 1950. Records in the file do not show that there have been any additions done to the house since that date. When it was constructed, it was placed on the lot so that the house is 29 ft. from Elmdale Rd. at the farthest west point and 27.6 ft. at the farthest east point. The current setback requirement for new construction is 35 ft. from any street right-of-way line. There are no records in the file that show a variance was granted for the house to be located closer than 35 ft. from Elmdale. Perhaps Elmdale Rd. was platted after the house was built or the setback requirement at that time was less than 35 ft. In any case, the existing house is considered conforming because it was constructed prior to 1982. The required front setback for houses constructed prior to 1982 is 25 ft. The applicant now wants to add several features to the south side of the house and bring it closer to the right-of-way line for Elmdale. In the case of any new construction, it must meet. the current setback requirement of 35 ft. The new construction includes a new 24 ft. by 24 ft. attached two car garage, a 2 ft. by 10ft. "bumpout" for kitchen expansion, and a 6 ft. by 11 ft. open front porch (portico). The attached garage would be located no closer than 24 ft. from Elmdale Rd. The 2 ft. by 10ft. "bumpout" for the kitchen would be located no closer than 26 ft. to Elmdale Rd. The 6 ft. by 11 ft. open porch would be located no closer than 22 ft. from Elmdale Rd. The survey indicates that there is an existing shed on the property that is located 4.1 ft. from the east property line and 4.9 ft. from the north property line. This shed is considered in a conforming location because the City allows the distance from the structure to be "rounded up" to the next whole number. The required setback for shed is 5 ft. from rear or side property lines. . . . As noted on the survey, this property is not exactly a rectangle because the frontage along Noble Ave. N. (west property line) is slightly greater than the width of the property as measured along the east property line. The proposed additions require the following variances from ~ity Code: · Section 11.21, Subdivision 10 (A) 1 Front Yard Setback. City Code requires that the front yard setback for all new construction be 35 ft. The variance request is for 11 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 24 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Elmdale Rd. for the proposed attached garage addition. · Section 11.21, Subdivision 10 (A) 1 Front Yard Setback. City Code requires that the front yard setback for all new construction be 35 ft. The variance request is for 9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 26 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Elm dale Dr. for the proposed kitchen "bump out". · Section 11.21 Subdivisions 10 (A) 1 Front Yard Setback. City Code requires that the front yard setback for all new construction be 35 ft. The variance request if for 13 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 22 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Elmdale Dr. for the proposed open front porch. No other variances have been granted or applied for at this location. 3139 .. 3125 3115 3101 ~ ~_~ml LOWRYTl!R 3140 3200 3129 3126 3201 3135 3U4 312$ 3120 3125 3114 3115 3114 3115 3100 3101 3100 3101 'TIU'TON DR .. 302i> 13000 Noble Avenue North , 3001 294S 2943 2941 2937 292$ 2913 z r Q CI: ~ ~_....._s. ~(jIl;cl1.OGlSGlIS200S . 3000 2946 2942 2940 2936 2912 302$ 3025 3016 3001 294S 2944 2943 2942 2941 ~ Iii ,. ~ :z 2940 2936 2937 2924 2925 2913 2912 302S l!\.MDAUl Rt) 2931 2925 2913 o 3011 4600 4601 294S 2941 3200 3126 Z ~ ~ 3120 :( :E 3U4 2944 2942 2924 2912 3201 3m 3125 292S 2913 4$Dl 294S 2941 i lit ~ ... ; 2937 . \ City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application NO. Date Received aZA Meeting Date Amount Received 1. Street address of property involved in this application: ?-!m ~Cl~k~eJ,\J(j I 6o\d~Va.\~ Applicant: f1nst-IYu_ S\~ Name ~ ~cHo !w<-'~f Address 2. Business Phone 7~5-~Z~" 4kf D Home Phone Q~t.J/(l.l~ . f1~. [;SC{ZL City/St e/Zip 7~~- L(ll.,- 704~ Cell Phone Email Address 3. . 4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or ther evidence, if appropriate. &V Mh C.O~ () . 5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I ~Iso understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. ~'~ Signature of Applicant ~,& ASSOCIATES ~N~' SURVEYING. ENGINEERING 72' OlD HJGHWA Y 8 N.W. NEW BRIGHTON. lIINNESOTA 55112 651-631-0351 rAi< 651-631-8805 INC. . VIEW FROM SOUTH . , 1r> nn T T"1 T,.. l ", T"1 '" y-, r-...y T~T{"T"""1"'(:.T PtiwER- - - - - - ""'" \ \ I \ ~" THE SLATER RESIDENCE LOT 12, BLOCK 11, NOBLE-GROVE 3000 NOBLE AVENUE NORTH CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADJACENT RESlOEHCE fJOI6 .;.;.,;,", I I I I I I """" 1fT _PIPE" '~! ~~ <rm- ------ ~ SHED ~, < 15. < =- UNES .Eo .. . ,.'OAK ADJACENT ....... ~..~. ...... ow' LOi ,2. N 89'54'59" E 134.7, .'MEAS' too (PLAT) - --fT', WOOD I PffIYACf I;, FEN~. ~" N , I :~ DCIOI1RAL . ARUNlT 'Iii' ~ <!$ 27.99 3000 NOBLE AVENUE NOR SINGLE STORY FRAtJ.f: RESIDENCE lIUI.DlNG FQCmIRlNT NIE'A .. M.I;5 sa. FT. , ' I NOBLE-G~O\JE 1/2' IRQN PIPE ... ST<lP 9SICN .~. =-~~~E1J~OAL$R6.A.Q~~'~ . ,,<"(60'RlCHTOf'WA'f.30'EJ1HER~~.~):. .,." .... ." ..:......~:~.~.:. ...~ 'F'OUND1/T -- LOT 10 ~ ...., \ \ \ .-...---\ U.uTY UNES \ \ ....1....... \ 1.............'............. ..... . :......'... . L POlE ........., ...... I I ~ I . o-~~ 1 INCH EQUALS 10 FEET BASIS FOR BEARINGS: EAST UN[ Of' lOT 12 ASStNED TO SEAR SOUTH FOR POOf"OSES CF THIS SlJIM:Y. REFERENCE DOCUlAENT: DEED DOCUMENT NO. 6004011 . PREPARED FOR: CHRISTINE SlATER 3000 NOBLE AVENUE NORlH GOlDEN VAllEY. MINNESOTA 55422 763-529-9210 . ......\..\\\\\;I~:I~~'II/,///',. CERTlFlCAlIOlI ...~~tt-f(\ ..........4r~-:~ I HEflEB'f'CER1IFY THAT 'IllS SURVEY. PI.AH. /' ....... .......'9 ~ ::.o:r:T=CTPRfPE~:OOR ~ ... PROFESS ".;; I AM A DUlY UCENSEO -..sIONAI. - ( tA \. LANOSUA~.J J ~.=o~ Ttlf LAWS Of THE . ;:,l..... 18407 ....J...~ j -r-.._ 1\ tr\ ~1"1.'. ........;:oJ~J h.. P .. ----- . ... '-- :...:...... ',... "-_.......~ ~I___ELd.Q-K......-?L-lt.~... ~.K~.....~-LA:WU- ~b€.~e~. ~y . . . J3roROQ-.t1-.--- ~ ~I N I' - -- I I I- _ _~T1f'-J.G- fAt1~ L'1.~_C?M P I .... . .... 6 :::J-- " I "- .... ,:>< :J- ~.. N .- I . I I I C-< .1\ RA-Gf....-- . _At)tJ \ TLQhL______.__ . 00 ob r- I 1 , _LI \Ill'" &- ~(X;jj I L _ _ , bJ!liJTL I (I ~/ )1., b \3Z.-~<:,.,~__.~E.k--r _n~.~_\:::L\C>b.l. ~~ ~ +~ ~ \A.. ~ -".' ._lll~lLn t'--_~\)t:>,r1 oN f 27 _0" /f , , ;;, y 01 I , " ~ z~ -0 ~/ Van Heel Construction 2375 Orkla Drive Golden Valley MN 55427-3435 Lie. #1592 763-542-9058 . . $, l-z, [/ -10'-1" /" f J't ,I Ii yr,.. . 9 \) Tt-\ f ( L VfcT\6\J . CUDl ~ /L.ITT8.~ ---;-C-l\7.... '<;;;;'\...........".' \~.. .....'.'-"-1 I!"" 'A V f',J" 2~"")" 1.[''-.1 O~~ r;... ", _,_,;:.:-;2~j . VA lJ-L L{ . . Van Heel Construction 2375 Orkla Drive G.~!den Valley MN 55427-3435 . Lic. #1592 763-542-9058 ~CALL;~~~L~:~,_ _ By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. rint Name '6 Comment Signature Address ?:i) ) ? 1\)0 b fe '" Print Name 9,./ II ,'A- Comment ~-'"'- ~ Ci t> L u ~--' J.! - T u ~ ID 6 i I - Signature ,~L if. _~~k~ Prillt Name j E l~~ CFiIf ('( "- Comment &' tn>-'b, L~ (.. I( Signature 9AtJff/tJ- ~ -: .nt Name et1 R.,~ 1 ~. r ol"N\ t0tl~i)v\' Comment So ~ - ~~'l0'tb~" I ~ ~(~M > ~~ Address 4(, ~ ul((jJ~~~e~ Print Name _k~it\ . CSSG ~ ::::~~ lr:AA~e\ I . . Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name .omment Signature ty\ It... Ir- e y l) dJ ~/A-I / 4- /J1 )J /-4Pr Address ~t/.)ZJ/ /!dA a~ "- \ ~ Address 29f~ ~aflu'&e N~ l.D. L L I . LQoc (,ttlZtU- Address sa Ie.:. (\Jo<&u; /AV6 N 5e.s 5e Ku.In" j" ,\{ .'~' pCchlffl\~ (SLw ~.J( L'. /It/t</f (;,,;y ~ ;:Z. -rN'r~/:::. Ir 4n&-t:- ;f~4 v;,?,uL % ~""p AAerd'k""'~A'-..<? ~.... ~ Address r1.~~V If/#<<..tt I'ft.-IC ""'. -" . -Fb'-~..rL~.. /~/1!>' -[...cd' . ....... I -'.' "" .... ", ,,- ~~Att.... , ., "~..1ill_ t.:...o n',.' , . . I .-....IimI;t-". . . .~ .- . , , '- . . . f............'. .... .....>.\ r f ,"_... A., .,..,. . ,~r"') f';'~'\ ..-...." '-t..~i. "'~'.- i . .~. ,J,'" S ,I .L.,I~ "f' It' It, f. C I. ~ ... It'. MINNEAPOLIS 43 Main 51""" 5E '~IO Mblne.-.polis; MN, 55414 TEL: 16121 379-3037 F^X: 16121379-0001 EXCELSIOR 4~ 5e<:ond Slr_ Excelsior, MN 5533! fEl: 19521 380-~817 F^X: 19521 380-4818 STlLLWATEIt 9Q.4 South Fourth Str... 5lillw;oter. MN, 55082 TEL: 165 II I5 1 'O'J61 f^X-:-t1l51135f-7J27 wwW.5AlAarc.com .. o o ., ul dj S-~~%5!~ Proj~dNurnber: C3Z0 z..b ~hitect: Drawn By:ta- -' . Sheet ,.No,