12-27-05 BZA Agenda
.
e
e
Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, December 27, 2005
7pm
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chambers
I.
Approval of Minutes - November 22, 2005
II.
The Petitions are:
6410 Glenwood Avenue (05-11-25)
Dale & Kim Lampe, Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 1 0(A)(1) Front Yard Setback
Requirements
. 17 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 18 ft. at its closest
point to the front yard (east) property line.
Purpose: To allow for a garage/home addition.
III. Other Business
IV. Adjournment
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
.
November 22, 2005
A regular meeting of the Golqen Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday,
November 22,2005 in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden
Valley, Minnesota. Sell called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
.erty on a location map and explained that the applicant is
two stall garage. She stated that currently the property owners are
Plymouth Avenue right-of-way and that the City will be constructing
ymouth Avenue in the near future. She stated that there is also a steep
slope 0 perty so the location being proposed for the new garage is the best place
in order to not have cars parked on the right-of-way. Grimes added that there would still
be approximately 22 feet from the new garage to the front yard property line so that cars
would not hang into the sidewalk right-of-way.
Those present were Members Duff, Landis and Sell and Planning Commission
Representative Waldhauser. Also present were Director of Planning a opment
Mark Grimes, Planning Intern Kristin Gonzalez and Administrative As
Wittman. Member McCarty was absent.
I. Approval of Minutes - October 25, 2005
Waldhauser referred to paragraph seven on page two and n
should be removed from the sentence "She said wond
"said"
MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Landis a
the October 25, 2005 minutes with the above n
nanimously to approve
II. The Petitions are:
.
Request:
on 11.21, Subd. 10(A)(1) Front Yard Setback
the required 35 ft. to a distance of 21.8 ft. at its closest
front yard (north) property line.
Sell pointed out the elevations on the surVey and stated that there is a 10 to 11 foot
difference from the top of the hill to the curb.
. John Wilson, son of the applicant, stated that they would like to build a two stall garage
and that they are asking fora variance due to the fact that the City is putting in a sidewalk
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
November 22,2005
Page 2
. which will deprive them of some of their current parking area. (The portion of the parking
area on City right-of-way.)
Sell stated that where the applicants are proposing to build the garage is the only place to
put it and that there is no way to come in to a garage from the rear of the lot. He asked if
the garage is going to be a basement type of garage and if they were going to dig into the
hill. Wilson said yes.
Waldhauser said she thinks the proposal makes sense. Theoretically a 99,69ge could be
n(:':;)P'~W::i}it:-:?'>
placed in the back of the lot, but it wouldn't be as accessible and it wo'd6e?\ ch more
trouble to build. She added that the garage will be less noticeable be it WI e built
into the hill.
rap ched roof. Wilson said
to remove approximately six
Duff stated that there are two hardships with this lot, one is
garage and the other is the problem with the sidewalk. He s,,,,
reasonable solution and that it would not be reasonab to ha~ili+ ac
the property.
Landis asked if the proposed garage would hav
it would have a pitched roof. He added that the
large trees in order to build on the back
.
MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded
variance for 13.2 ft. off the requir
front yard (north) property line i
carried unanimously to approve a
istance of 21.8 ft. at its closest point to the
two-stall garage.
ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 12.5 ft. at its closest
oint to the front yard (east) property line.
To allow for a garage addition.
Gonzale red to a location map and pointed out the property located at the corner of
Glenwood and Xenia Avenues. She explained that the applicants are proposing to build a
garage into the front yard setback on the Xenia Avenue (east) side of the property. She
stated thatthe applicants believe their hardship to be the irregular shape of the lot and
the fact that theIr property was affected by the construction of Xenia Avenue, which has
limited their options because of the right-of-way.
.
Waldhauser asked how much property was lost when Xenia Avenue was constructed.
Grimes stated that approximately 3,800 square feet was involved.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
November 22,2005
Page 3
. Melissa Nelson, applicant explained that they traded property with the City. The City gave
them additional property on the Xenia Avenue side in exchange for some property on the
Glenwood Avenue side.
Grimes referred to a garage shown on the survey and asked the applicant's if they would
be removing it. Ms. Nelson said that it has already been removed. Grimes referred to the
attached garage space located at the front of the house. Ms. Nelson said that is going to
be removed as a part of this proposed project.
Sell asked the applicants how long they've owned the house. Ms. Nel
owned the house since 1993.
on the
a fireplace
om. Ms.
order to save
Sell asked the applicants why they are proposing a 3D-foot wi
basically a 3-stall garage. Ms. Nelson said that a 3D-foot wi
site because it has an odd angle. She added that there are
that they don't want to block. Sell asked if part of the inc
Nelson said yes: Waldhauser asked if the mudroom i
t~e windows and the fireplace. Ms. Nelson said
Grimes asked about the height of the existin
tall and that the City installed it. Ronald
approximately 3 feet.
Ison said the fence is 8 feet
e City raised Xenia Ave up
.
Waldhauser asked the applicant
the lot. Ms. Nelson said they di
the angle of the lot they wo
red etting the garage further back on
the garage further back but because of
ceo
Grimes stated that there
without a variance. e ad
probably considere
area on this lot where a garage could be built
when t e house was built, the Xenia Ave. side was
Sell noted that
is square e
ute triangular shaped lot and that every other lot near it
Waldha proposed project would still work if the garage was narrower
th 30 fe ked the applicants to elaborate on why the garage needs to be 30
fee 'de. M n explained that the proposed mudroom is the entrance to the house
and t e stairs in that location. Ms. Nelson added that although the proposed
garage I et wide they are only putting in two garage doors and using the rest of the
space for storage.
Waldhauser said she initially had a hard time seeing the need for a 36-foot addition. She
said she is still having some trouble with that, but she also realizes that it won't impact
any neighbors so she sees no problems with the proposal.
.
Duff stated. that he too has some reserVations, but because of the odd shaped lot and
issues with the property lines they are left with only one small area that they can do
anything with so in this circumstance, this seems to be a reasonable request.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
November 22, 2005
Page 4
. Sell agreed that it is a tough, odd shaped lot. He added that because of the way Xenia
Ave. drops off, the proposed garage won't be noticeable. He said it is a good plan that
will increase the value of the neighborhood.
.
.
MOVED by Duff, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to approve
the variance request for 22.5 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 12.5 ft. at its
closest point to the front yard (east) property line in order to build a garage addition.
6410 Glenwood Avenue (05-11-25)
Dale & Kim Lampe. Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 10(A
Requirements
ack
. 17 ft. off the required 35 ft. to
point to the front yard (east
Purpose: To allow for a garage/home
Grimes stated that the applicants are re
living space and construct a new gara
closest point from the property line
was some confusion regardingt
thought Edgewood Avenue wa
applicants are trying to avo'
the existing curb cut. He
this lot that the Board sh
eir existihg garage into
n angle and be 18 feet at its
it",venue. He explained that there
this property and that the applicants
d a side yard. He stated that the
mature trees and they are proposing to keep
are some other options with construction on
Sell referred. to the
corner of the h
Applicant, stat
29.8 feet.
shed t
ed that the dimension from the existing south east
line along Edgewood was not listed. Kim Lampe,
as an updated survey. Grimes stated that the dimension is
e applicants have said thatthey will be moving the existing
on as well.
M$~~,tkampe at they were not aware that the property has two front yard setbacks
and<t t the k f that asa hardship. She explained that the reason they are
propo t e garage be set at an angle is because they want to utilize both of the
homes en es.. She stated that adding onto the front of the house cuts off the front
entrance and that adding onto the back of the house cuts off the back entrance.
Sell asked if the existing deck would be removed. Dale Lampe, applicant said yes. He ~
stated that the existing garage is only 16 feet wide so they can't get two cars in it.
Waldhauser asked the applicants when they purchased the home. Mr. Lampe said they
purchased it in May 2005.
Ms. Lampe stated that their house is almost 40 feet away from the neighboring house so
it wouldn't feel like the proposed garage is so far into the front setback.
.
Waldhauser asked the applicants if their
getmore kitchen and dining room spa
apart from the need for a double gar
the hardship in this case. The ho
addition but she doesn't think t
hardship and it would be fea
Sell clarified that by angling the proposed garage it would come approxi
closer to the east property line than the existing house.
Waldhauser stated that the proposed 30 ft. x 25 ft. garage is rea
Ms. Lampe said the garage would only have two garage door
ge.
Waldhauser asked the applicants about the possibility of jus
garage into a full two-stall garage. Ms. Lampe explain that
is currently located. She said that the proposal is to c
kitchen and dining room space and that becaus
problems and angles it wouldn't work.
t"'r existing
heir back door
istin garage into
various other
ing this garage addition is to
es. Waldhauser said that
sary she has a hard time seeing
se cently and this would be a nice
~JI?nal kitchen and dining room space is a
n to tfle existing garage.
Duff stated that he is als
he thinks considerin cor
hard time finding tr
. e seeing a hardship ih this instance. He said
s a hardship is too inclusive. He said he also has a
and that for him trees are more of an economic issue.
ause corner lots have two 35-foot setbacks and that he
g a tree. He said he sees this corner as being a hardship. Duff
orner lots to be a hardship is too broad in his opinion.
any years this house has been considered non-conforming. He said
st was along the Glenwood Avenue side of the property he would
oblem with it. He stated that if this were a proposal just to get a bigger
garage t toys and lawn mowers he would say no, but this proposal is to create a
better living space. He said he looks at it like it is already a non-conforming situation that
would be a little bit more non-conforming and the next house is 75 to 80 feet away so he
would, in this case, support the variance request.
.
Grimes stated that existing home was built before 1982 so it is considered conforming.
He asked the applicants why they couldn't keep the same setback as the current garage
and remove the tree in the back. Waldhauser noted that the tree in the front makes too
severe of an angle forthe driveway.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
November 22, 2005
Page 6
. Landis asked about the height of the existing tree in the back yard. Ms. Lampe said she
did not know the height, but that it is approximately 30 inches in diameter and the tree in
the front is 80 years old. Landis said he agreed with Sell. Waldhauser said that this
proposal would be increasing the intrusion by quite a bit.
.
.
Duff stated that no one is stating anything unreasonable and this is a positive plan but for
him there has to be a hardship and he doesn't see one in this case;
Grimes stated that since there are only 4 Board Members present they c
this request in order to have a full Board present.
Sell asked the applicants if they would like to table their request
2005 meeting.
0,
Mr. Lampe said they would like to table their request.
MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Duff and motion
variance request for 6410 Glenwood Avenue un .
Zoning Appeals meeting.
III. Other Business
Sell asked the Board if they woul
The Board discussed dates. Gr"
the City Council about what
e B annual holiday party this year.
he;..yld poll the Planning' Commission and
ould b~'J available.
IV.
.
05-11-25
6410 Glenwood Avenue
.
Dale and Kim Lampe, Applicants
.
.
.
.
Planning
763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax)
Date:
November 15, 2005
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Kristin A Gonzalez, Planning Intern
Subject:
6410 Glenwood Avenue
Dale & Kim Lampe, Applicant
The Lampes own the house and property at 6410 GlenwoodAvenue. The applicants are
requesting a variance from Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1), Front Yard Setback, in order to
construct a new garage addition. A survey was required to obtain information regarding the
existing structures on the property. The proposed new garage addition to the house will
bring it to within 18 feet of the east front property. line. The existing garage will be turned into
living space.
The applicants state that their hardship is the fact that the house is on a corner lot and
therefore subject to two front yard setbacks. Another hardship is the placement of the
existing home on the lot. Also this option will protect several mature trees.
The project requires a variance from the following City Code:
· Section 11.21, Subd. 10 (A)(1), Front Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the required
front yard setback shall be 35 feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way
line. The requested variance is for 17 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 18 ft. at its
closest point to the front property line.
A review of the City file indicates that the house was built in 1952. No othermajor additions
have been made to the house since that time.
6S01l
9~ 6448 119
6454
W1!:!ffERtt AVf.
100 (I
-=::A uo(~J US
.... ~~ ~
--~ ~~
Ili
'~
~ /6716 6706
.,~ 6630
"i ~~ 662016610 20S
215 I "" .... ~
6701 ~ ~~
.~
340
315 325
330
320
28
~
310
'---
24S
2,",
235
tI'l
" In
o
~
tI'l
!i:
)0
:;
:z
220
230
.
225
210
1-
I'
_fi
:it
~
- ri
e
-
r---
6633
6620
5
6623
1-
1-
6530
6600
::-'
WEsrER~ AVE "
28
6670
6560
6630
6530
~
f.OI:
tl
:it
~ 6695 6665
:5
~
66U 6630
28
... CORT'LAWN ems..
28
6655
329
319
309
301
231
221
215
.209
125
105
111
15
lit
~
o
~
:z
6401
--
'-
il
\
~
\II
110
120
130
6615 6565 6535 6515 6495 6415 64S5 6445
(1)
.
124
---/120
110
6330
105
320
316
300
240
230
220
210
146
130
6324 6320
115
125
135
145
2IS
6237
245
2SO
23$
2V
~.
14.'0<:#
,~~O
2U
217
221
20S
117
~ 124
'ilr A~ ...
i'" "?~
~qV:
~
109
25
26
15t \
.~.!
100'
.
6140
6145
120
125
,
145
II!
~ 20S
<(
~
0
lIlI 225
~
. 245
140
200
220
240
309
305
300
320
325
320
43llf1
:J24
~~K""'"'... ~
~<l"'" .
"
\.' >
\ ... .
. ..\
"'
55
75,
/ i/
:r:
~
....
a
. f~
r--:-
105
6100
6101
120
~ 125
i
145
III
...
~ 20S
S m
I
ill
. 245
305
I m'
I
140
200
220
240
City of Golden Valley
Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) ,
Zoning Code Variance Application
, For Office Use Only:
Application No.
Date Received
BZA Meeting Date
Amount Received
1. Street address of property involved in this application:
b 110 GrlElVLUcc>.D 4t/s.
2. Applicant: &'-: {,,:, f {c-ltM Lafl4r
A~fs erI4lto/d>d.A-w-- JGb/d~ V~/!JtMfs!ate;;:-1q.l
-~
Business Phone Home Phone
J?I f1Il , f,./k1V/ f6Al (;,c;>McP61' . 'NET
Email Address
3.
Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site
plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be
approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued.
Ne:w ADt71r/~ or:: A"rrAc.l-fe1;;> zq )(;72 c;,~e '17./ rp.XIGTIAh, .'0,6'2-
p...;xf/l1~u;r2.. e)<l~TfrJc;., lib' tAtr:;;e ~~~ ~At..-v &' (25ML)""171J1.,~
,
1J.J'f1!? lAv'/~ SPAce.
.
4. A brief statement of the hardship which provides legal grounds for the granting of this variance
(see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs,
or other evidence, if appropriate.
f~Pf'~ ~e AW1-not-l WuJtl,f7 ~ 1$' bpP ff0~ lIAC J:;uE" 1D
POlLOlJ/JJ~ ~lfS;~ tar tJJ1"(f e. "P(Zo1JT~s. j ftAceNeNr
t:::P qt.t6.IAlkt- Hf,~~ ~ n cur,: ..,kNp' SI!:V~ fv1M74.f2E 7fZ1E.fdS _
5. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also
understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted,
is not taken within one year, the variance expi s.
.
6. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the
owher of this property:
l&-
Print Name of owner
Signature of owner
Variance Application Submittal:
The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete
application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted:
X' Completed application form,including signatures of surrounding property owners.
...x A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey
requirements.
~ A brief statement of the hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see
Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
/\
You may submit detailed description of bUilding(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in
this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of
any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit
is issued.
~
Variance application fee, as follows: $125 - single family residential; $225 - other
Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners
Note to the variance applicant:
As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all
surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly
across the streeLlf on a corner, this means across both streets.
To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them
about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them
sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your
project and gives them opportunity to comment.
If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at
home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then
write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the
time and place of the BZA meeting.
Note to surrounding property owners:
This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of
i/ii.y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be
.eiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting.
By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that
you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project.
Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other
statements regarding the project.
rint Name IJ-L-b-ee..-r-r-(LICic-
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
.int Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
13t? etv 4-0U , '7e 0
AA4-T/( _QL.X
'" - . .. ,
Address ( I dJ t:I..l'/~~ tvz:'t")p ..Jit'P#i?
C A f2. Cz,AJ l-be t:~
G~... t::> /
C~ 724;(-
t:DLJ/ftY GR~ jI-
G t> d J- .1 d e ~
~
Address f{"O t[.J ,~ .....oo~ tJ
Address
{p33d ~
t7(~l/ 1bM~/AI~~
~~_.-
Address lU? ~~A-,~
~fOaJl/:J1 Ti~~FJ
---rt81- he J4,;te. -
Address fb+l8 C:/enWD~d ~
Print Name ~ 4tk.f'/P?
Comment --ne::r-f h~-
Signature Address 41nl c;;,1ep,IA)l:!red~
Print Name
.mment
Signature
(L/
AddressbLfG4 W~rJ Ave-
.
.
.
~\)\),
~
-......:;:
\v\o
~.
GOL
CERTIFIC. OF SURVEY
FOR: Dale W. & K erly S. Simpson-Lampe
6410 Glenwood Ave,
Golden Valley, MN 55427
LEGAL DESCRIPtION: That part of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No~ 322, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
South of the North 130 feet thereof.
'V!
<0'
,,0
'7
w,
~
\
\
!~o ' .' 1.'
~.'~,.Sb(Jfh Line ofrhe Nor I h
I ~tf> I '. Ma' .\
lY ~l~o:. I. -141JO -S 8~ 7' 09 E-
')(..... I (14<1.&Ph',;I)
'- Mef-t\, L'rne o~ le. t 4-
'tf-
-' 1+1-,~-
'-'I
. ~! ' N)~l~~
f70 f~bi of-Loi ~ ~ ~\{'C<~(1)~
Aud, 51J btd , No. .., 2.7.. \ rv':">/
\. All
-, \._1~ __ ,
" .
\
.<ZI:J
-r:
tit::::
tl/
"V~
'c::>
-f!
'^.
'"
€,
'J
If.
~
\"
;.-."
,
W
o
~
\.1"
t...l
00
Z
\,
\
..~
,
.
\
c
q
v--
o
',,-
...
//
/
'\
. ~o.:
,./
/
\
l
o
(
fN
<>
--
,)
"..-..'-........11<.
/
I
r
, I
"I I
f.
.... .,..; ~
I
\
\
o
<.r
.
c--1 /'
a-:
(--J
J\j
Ie
0-
'~
tv.
-;J: ~ ..
',0
,.~ ><0
J~
~~;>~
/\"'1 r1l\! "
'"
\, ,
~o 'f\ .
~~ ('
".&'
< (r1:;{i.....;1})< ~..,
,,>~~':.>~:',
a -,; "'\.,.. ,
.,,~ " - - - ~" ... - #I
.;s-Q . t -'"
'- \/ o. i
-~. \
--
LO I
r
~"0'
~~.
~~.
WESTERN
AVE.,
~o
\,
,
,
LLl
""-
,/'" .
<C
Q
o
33
w
\D
a
u.l
roo
.
'.' i..,,,?)
~
I
(""J'
-
I'D
v1
if)
~
a
I--
o
:J
"'<C
't,
LEGEND:
Scale: I inch = 30 feet
Bearmgs as shown are assumed
· Denotes Iron Monument Found (I)
o Denotes Iron Monument Set (3}[Capped by RLS No, 10948]
M - Current M.ment
P - Originlll Me ement
.'
Y/J~.
and Surveyor, Mn,LI nse No. 10948
1\T"t(l' nl("t'1""f'"f'l(' ';'II'" ,-;.'\""("',,....,...;.1 '"l'"' :~.., r~_,",,, 4 ".l-L'1 ~~_", J f 1. .L' r,. j
.
14"1JO se<l.56'oq'E
'1
I I
I
I
I
n
I~WL-
I
I
",-
I'
I
,
.
I
I
I
ILU
I~
lQ
2
8
I~
I
I
I
.,,---.....~
I' ,
I' \
/ \
I 0' I d
\ , J
\ /. '"
, I
" I'
......----/
"
I
,
I
\
\
"..... //
----
--...
.... ~
,
\
\
I
"
f
I
",1'
.....---
0.
--
,.----.....~
" ~
\1
\
:.
,
f
I
"
"
",
/,,--- .....,
,
f \
, \
:, -,])
I "_....]
--..... "
/ \( o"r- ""',
( 0 : ""-1'" \
\ --I... \ ,
~.,.~_/ ,-'\,-..... /'
{ 0,"1 .... ",
\ I I 0 \
_J( J
\ I'
.
~
I h....eby certify that this drawing was
prepared by me or under my direct
supllr'/lslon and that I om 0 duly
Registered Profesalonal Architect under
the Iowa of the Slate of Minnesota
Registration No. 23589
Dote 11 /5/05
Drown By KSL
O1ecked By 0 WL
Commlaslon No. 200509-0
Prolecl location:
LAMPE RESIDENCE
6410 GLEN WOOD AVE
GOLDEN VALLEY, MN
-
....
" .
,
'\'~
10
IZ
II
IW
/i
",,,/ ~
Q
i
W
I
I
I
~....
BRICKBOXGROUP
DALE LAMPE. AlA .L
8410 Gl.D<WOOO AIlE
GOLDEN VAllEY. tiN !l!H27
T, 7e3-54lI-104Q
.
...-
,,-
\ /
,,,/'
~ /
/
/
/'- ./
/ .........._--;
.
.......
.......
"
,~
, .
\ I /
S~ ~ /\~/
-~/ ,
",/ I
",/ ,.
,,/ I
/' /
,,-
/
,,-
/
,,-
,,-
,,-
/ ./
/ ...-
~------ ..
p
-----
..... .......
/ ,
/ \.
/ \\
I \
, 0 I(
\ , I
\ i
\ /'
, /~
'- ./.-
.......... - - -""
35' FRONT SETBAc.K
25' FRONT 5ETBAGK
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
---
..... .......
/ "-
/ \.
._._._.,(._._._._._._._._._._._.~-
I \
,
\
\
\
o
t
IS' side 5etbaGk.?
._~._._.-._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.-.
, --.......
,/' "-
, / ,
/'7"....... t
'-'-'---'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'~;(~~~.:J:'~I~_._.
(352.'10 Soodei~IE " /
, \ \.~ / /.
\. 1:..~..L. _ __ /r
I CURBLINE
~
'- /h'
..........----
/
\. /
" :/,6i
" /.
....... .....
~--._---'.,..
-~
EDGEWOOD AVENUE NORTH
.
~
ProJoct Location:
LAMPE RESIDENCE
6410 GLEN WOOD AVE
GOLDEN VALLEY. MN
I hereby certify that this drawing was
prepared by me or und.- my direct
supenllslon and that I om 0 duly
Regrst.-ed Profesalonol Architect under
the lows of the State of Minnesota
Registration No. 23589
Dot. 11 /5/05
Drawn By KSL
DALE LAMPE. "'A
Checked By D WL 8410 CUNWOOll .ow:
~ VAU.EY. tI" 55427
Commission No. 200509-01 T: 783-&Q-l040
BRICKBOXGROUP
.L