Loading...
04-22-03 BZA Agenda Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, April 22, 2003 - 7 pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room I. Approval of Minutes - March 25, 2003 II. The Petitions are: 2900 Cherokee Place (03-04-07) Dan and Lisa Jacobson, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks . 17.8 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 17.2 ft. at its closest point to the side property line along Culver Rd. for the addition. . 13.7 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 21.3 ft. at its closest point to the side property line along Culver Rd. for the existing garage. . 14.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20.1 ft. at its closest point to the side property line along Culver Rd. for the existing house. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a dining room, mud room, family room addition to the existing home. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings . 4.5 ft. off the required 10ft. distance between the house and garage at its closest point. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed addition to be too close to the existing garage. 4500 Hampton Road (03-04-08) Doualas W. Paaenkopf, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Setbacks . 2 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 23 ft. at its closest point from the rear property line to the existing attached garage. . 16 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point to the rear property line from the proposed attached garage expansion. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed garage expansion. 700 Parkview Terrace (03-04-09) Tom and Jennifer Dolan, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 9.6 ft. off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25.4 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Parkview Terrace for the existing house. . 15.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 19.4 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Parkview Terrace for the proposed porch addition. . Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed porch addition to the existing home. 1111 Rhode Island Ave. N. (03-04-10) Jane Rivezzo, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 5.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 29.4 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Rhode Island Ave. N. for the existing home. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements. 4112 Poplar Drive (03-04-11) Rvusuke and Merri Lvnn Jono, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . 7.13 ft. off required 15 ft. to a distance of 7.87 ft. at its closest point to the side (west) property line for the existing house Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment 2 , . Minutes 9f a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals March 25, 2003 , A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Monday, March 25, 2003, inthe Council Chambers 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Sell called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Chair Sell, members Cera, McCracken-Hunt, Smi Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were Staff Liaiso Recording Secretary Lisa Wittman. . I. Approval of Minutes - February 25, 2003 II MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Cera and motion approve the February 25, 2003 minutes as submitted. II. The Petitions are: 9015 Elgin Place (02-11-68) Paula and Michael Watkins A . Request: Rear Yard Setbacks · 8.2 feet off th proposed ee a distance of 7.8 feetfor the est point to the rear yard property line. Purpose: item was tabled at the November 26, 2002 Board of that since then the applicants have looked at different sed rear deck. He explained that the ,applicants now would be built in the same location as was done in 1980, which is roperty line. the last request was for a family room addition instead of a deck, est now is for a deck. Paula Watkins, applicant, stated that in Novem ariance request for the enclosed portion of the family room deck combination was not approved so now they are just requesting the deck. Smith asked the applicant if the deck addition was going to be along the same line as what she proposed in November. She stated that it would be the same or less than what she requested in November and that she is just looking for approval to build a deck in the same location as the prior owners in 1980 did. . '. Minutes of the Board ot'Zoning Appeals March 25, 2003 Page 2 Shaffer stated that the concerns he had before are now gone because the deck will be an open structure, the same thing has been built in the past and building the deck won't make conditions worse. MOVED by Smith, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to approve the request fqr 8.2 feet off the required 16 feet to a distance of 7.8 feet for the proposed deck at its closest point to the rear yard property line. . Olson explained that the applicant's contractor the property line without a permit and th issued a stop work order and required to the applicant that according. to the the property line but that the dec which at this point would mean . 12 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance deck at its closest point to the north si yar 1566 Rhode Island Avenue North (03-03-04) Doua MacLauahlin, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Purpose: To allow for the construction of ad ction of a deck, right up to partment discovered it and e. He said that he explained e retaining wall can stay right on er n three feet to the property line, . n of the deck. Doug Maclaughlin, appli build a deck on the nort attached to the hou e an decided to do. He s only sporadical an t in August his contractor told him that he could without a building permit if it was not s than eight inches off the ground so that is what they e that time the contractor has come to the job site d to get a hold of. rk still needs to be done. Maclaughlin stated a small portion the fence around the deck still need to be done. 's any space at all from the property line tothe deck. Maclaughlin is set back a couple of feet from the prop line. Cera reiterated that amount that would have to be removed from the deck. Maclaughlin said that the deck will enhance the value of the home and the neighborhood and that his main concern is safety. Sell asked the applicant if the contractor would now be willihg to take out a building permit. Maclaughlin stated that he hoped so but that he has consulted with another . contractor as a back up. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 25, 2003' Page 3 . Olson stated that the City doesn't like to approve structures located right on prop~rty lines because then people have to go onto neighboring properties to maintain them. Cera asked the applicant if he thought his contractor would fix the problem if th~ Board voted against this variance request. Maclaughlin said that he would have to rely on his actions and his work in the past. McCracken-Hunt stated that there is a potential safety issue with the gap retaining wall and deck oncethe portion of the deck was moved. Sell a gate~ . Shaffer stated that he would be willing to appro property line for the deck. He said he doe circumstances and he can see where t too far. ,I Shaffer stated that the real issue is that the setback is suppos the City allows the deck to be three feet from the property Ii the applicant's responsibility. Maclaughlin said he understo Sell asked how deep the gap between the deck and re Maclaughlin stated that it would be approximate t for three feet to the e understands the ng, but that he went a little Cera stated that he also under cerned about setting a precedent. . ecause the contractor did come to the City to eceive. Sell stated that this situati talk about the project an hard time connecting this request to any type of a sonable use of the, property. oncern is that approving this request says to people go gets caught and then it's okay. . it was in the back and it was sitting low to the ground it would be n and tear the deck out and put in pavers with a fence around it he same thing. He said he is looking at it logically and trying to come line. McCracken-Hunt said the information they received from the City was incorrectly implied. . Shaffer said that he is not usually in favor of things being built wrong but in this case he can tell what the contractor was trying to do. '. . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 25, 2003 . Page 4 MOVED by Shaffer and seconded by Smith to approve the request for 12 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance . of 3 feet for the proposed deck at its closest point to the north side yard property line. The motion was approved 3 to 2. Members McCracken- Hunt and Cera voted ,to deny to request. 532 Clov~rleaf Drive (03-03-05) Kal Hoaenson and Carolvnne Trout, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) Side Yard S . 3.3 feet off the required 11.7 feet td a distance 0 garage at its closest point to the east side yar Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garageadditi Olson explained that the applicant currently has a sin build another single stall. Carolynne Trout, applicant, stated that they wo Cera asked ifthey would be tearing do be tearing down the existing garage house. ge. Trout said they would uld be integrated with the Shaffer stated that this prop request. ip requirements and that it is a modest Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the 11.7 feet to a distance of 8.4 feet for the proposed st side yard property line. r' frbm Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks .7 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.3 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Wesley Drive. . 5.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.6 feet for the existing garage at its closest point to the front yard property line along Wesley Drive. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements. . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 25, 2003 Page 5 Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12(A) Accessory Buildings I · To allow the existing detached garage to be located beside the existing home, instead of behind the home. Purpose: To bring the existing garage into conformance with accessory building requirements. Olson stated that the applicants are building a deck behind their home a variances they are requesting are to bring the existing home into conf setback requirements. Sell asked if there are some cases where a building permit is ' Olson explained that that is for sheds, not decks. Brian Hoefer, applicant, explained that the deck is 14 an inspection done. He said it was his understandin deck without a permit. .1 MOVED by Smith, seconded by Cera and motio following requests: · .7 feet off the required 35 feet to closest point to the front yard · 5.4 feet off the required 35 f closest point to the front . To allow the existing d instead of behind the eet for the existing home atits ng esley Drive. f 29.6 feet for the existing garage at its line al g Wesley Drive. to be located beside the existing home, III. Olson announc eliminate get constraints, his position with the City has peen oard of Zoning Appeals meeting. IV. ,,~ ~ 'it . . 2900 Cherokee Place I 03-04-07 . Dan & Lisa Jacobson . . . II '. . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: April 1.1, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Mark W. Grimes, Director of Plannjng and Development From: Subject: 2900 Cherokee Place (03-04-07) Dan and Lisa Jacobson, Applicant Dan and Lisa Jacobson own the house and property at 2900 Cherokee Place (the northeast corner of Cherokee Place and Culver Rd.). They came to the City to apply for a building permit in order to construct a large addition (dining room, mud room and family room) to their house. It was determined by staff that variances from the Zoning Code (Section 11.21) would be necessary in order for the construction to occur. Also, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing house, garage and shed do not meet building setback requirements. The following are the requested variances: · The first variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the setback from streets (front or side) shall be 35 ft. The requested variance to the proposed addition is 17.8 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 17.2 ft. at its closest point to the property line along Culver Rd. · The second variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. The requested variance is for 13.7 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 21.3 ft. at its closest point to the property line along Culver Rd. for the existing garage. (This variance could be granted with or without the above variance being granted. This would make the garage legally non-conforming and permit conforming additions to the property in the future. ) · The third variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the setback from streets (front or side) shall be 35 fh The requested variance to the existing house is 14.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20.1 ft. at its closest point to the side property line along Culver Rd. for the existing house. (The Board may want to consider this variance if the first variance is not granted in order to make the existing house legally non-conforming. This would permit conforming additions in the future.) . . . , · The fourth variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12(A) Accessory Building. City Code states that accessory building must be located behind the house and at least 10ft. from the house. If the proposed addition is built,4he garage will be located too close to the addition. The requested variance is for 4.5 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 5.5. ft. between the proposed addition and the garage at its closest point. As for the existing shed in the rear yard, staff told Mrs. Jacobson that the shed mu'st be moved because iUs currently located within a utility easement as shown onthe survey. Staff recommends that the shed be moved prior to the issuance of any building permits for the addition. The shed should not be that difficult to move since it is not located on a foundation. A review of the file indicates that the house was built in 1948 and the garage in 1959. Some remodeling has been done to the int~rior of the home including basement improvements in 1999. " . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number Date Rec-e1ved 3/'-1/03 Amount Received 5. O. d) i ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this peti,tion: 2q()Q r ~Qn1)~O P}()J ~ 2. ' BZA Petition Date ~ .. 25 - O.:s 3. Petitioner: D();n.J.- / DJrJ... ,\0..('--0 beY!} - Name Aq(X) · r ~-O ~Al\o L ~l(J.Q G-o 59-f"LL Address.' . ()u......' City/StatelZip 71r-,~. ~~h. hBR ~(-:f"'llb~~) i-b"2;. $8. -+~)1.1"::J... Business Phone Home Phone l.o \ '2. .6 ':f.h . q 6'3'5 - L..r.:,o... lJ-)cr". 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please ~ame property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): I X>f '::J- J F:d6(\ X, Y I Looc:rj,Jfu0f"') ~ , 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: i Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other :: . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in 'this petition. The site plans and drawings sUbmitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. /~ 1f1J'1()1/~ V4VefL /Wfu~ 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. " 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the hoyse and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 5"0.00 representing the I Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~"k~ · gnature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. '. . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties 9butting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. , NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property ,owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name Comment Y~tJ Vn J1 i-I-oRN Signature \0.. .i..1L Address 2<fo I 7 e.rt.t1.y A-Vl::...- tJ Print Name Comment jV'~ It li,1I) CD 01116'"'1 J Signature~ r,. Address '2.'1' I L CIJGiYJ I( r;; 7; Il.. Print Name p 1- 1) C"h ~ (~'21 '(\ S ~ f) Comment Signature ~ ~ Address .r/9o? (1J?~/J &_ Print Name /-~-A'E;~/ - I1lvv f~~ ~AJ Comment Signature ~~. ~ - Address yq I ~ {~/.A / ~. ?/~ , Print Name (YJ1tt< JC. AI AU L r . Comment . . Signature jV\oi, f\~ Print Name~1f! ~1f1Jt ,.,-r Comment Signature~7~ Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment: Signature Print Name Comment Signature Address t?-~/3 fillp. '1 AVENatzT,-l (y.V.S9 1).:J- , Addres~9"1 ~L ~f ~ -B~~ PuLL ,- /J4c... 55"'1L Address Address Address Address ,I , 'e. Waver request for property: Description: Lot 7,' Block 4, Woodlawn Park Address: 2900 Cherokee Place Resident: Daniel & Lisa Jacobson As property owners we would like to request a I waver allowing us to encroach into the required setback of 35 feet from the side of our house. Which by code also falls under front setback guidelines. We wish to remove the existing sun porch from the house and expand upon that by 4 feet, to add a dinning room, family room, and mudroom. Currently the houses dinning room is very small and is more of a hallway than a dinning room. The house currently does not have any type of mudroom or main floor family room. The following applies to our request .:. e .:. .:. .:. .:. .:. We will not be infringing on any utility easements. Neighbors do not have any issue with our request. Two large trees and a row of bushes will screen the addition from the side road. The addition will stay flush with the front of the house that is 35 feet from the property line (west facing). Comer visibility will not be affected. This would not be out of place in the neighborhood; other homes ,seem to encroach into the setback requirements~ In addition, there is an'existing requirement that a new addition has to be at least ten feet from an existing structure. We would like to request a variance, so we can build within 4 1/2 feet from the existing garage. Without the variances the addition will not be possible. Other locations considered woul4 require us to remove trees, and would prohibit the use of our back yard. Our backyard is fenced in and is the children's play-area. We would hate to lose that use, by building on it. " e Please, grant our,waver request. The current front setbacks applying to 2 sides of our house, has put us in a difficult position, one that we would like to resolve. We thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Established in 1962 N ~ LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LA WS OF S1 A 1E OF MINNES01 A 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 550...3093 Fal{ No. 560-3522 INVOICE NO. 65212 F.B.NO. 949-25 SCALE: 1" == 20' N It') c:o > c: ~ I l' 0- ~ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 ~urury.ors <!!rrtifiratr o Denotes Iron Monument C Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation anly xOOO.O Denotes EKisting Elevation <eoo:'yoenotes Proposed Elevation . Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades ore subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plon before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building SURVEY FOR: DAN JACOBSON Property loeated in .Secti on 7, Township 29. Range 24. Hennepin County ,"i nnesota I I I I I I I '},. 1ge. '. l;~~=t~::.",.. f . (..,l,,'h~ ~'. '. ~.."'... .....:......... .....~. ..:........::/..,}:::.~... . .... ~.., NOTE:Elevation datum 8$sUlled ? 7.0 twlL.t1'1 E.A% t-fft-P- " 115.9 \ \ . \ ~ll7JJ.- \ .shed carner ,/ clear 0.3' / / : 1 99' I I , :ge. ,"4 ( ...i'::;, ......:~~. ..~.. .t ....'1.) ;. ..........:r.h ., '. corner of fence .....on line 01 ge. J 1r-- : It') _- __.-.!l'O' ~ :-.ti I '- * : I 96.9 ;oOd fenee_ _99'\ t'") .j. C'4 II -J 6 ge' , 24,0" I 1""1?o l>'rlt..t-ry , I ISA$6He.l'1" . J:";a::I t.) < .....:3 P... o~ 9'0' \ ge. ~ z:.: -' . J:";a::I r:Ll ~ o ~. r:Ll r.t: u <n. ..q' . ~ {:&'I. ::I! 99'r, 1.0. g, 0 >-< CI:! to . t:t:: 0, '.q< 10 oZ ~ t; gas ~ ,.'.." _____--u--~~J-"--"--:~:~r'. i.o. ' 9~r : 0. . . : (t) " . . : 0.6 . . . .' J..: o T & ..t i~.j: .. "':?~'~::?:::~'.::. iJverheod ",'ires . .-.-w--.-.-_. 11.3 PROPOSED ADDITION . . . .. .. . . O. . . . 10. N: . . power. 91.1'1. 9 9'O~ -- .~. .: () C.. ~> ,~ 0) 5.2 l.'1 .-4 N Gl ..... Gl ~ > o .- c: .... 0-0 o 00.0 .\ .........-......-- 96.0 power po~ ._ __._._._.-It<-._~l'U.. ._. ...........___---. ----.-- .__.-w--- . wires ...--.-,,-...--.- power pole '},.Ir ge' edge of bituninous 1'0 99' CULVER ROAD Lot 7, Block 4, WOODLAWN PARK ThE!cmlyeasements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a surveyot the boundaries otthe above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments. if any. from or on said land. $i9~~ QQJL{ Surveyed by us this 17th day of March 20.m... ~ Charles l.Anuerson. Minn. Reg. No.21753 or Cregory R. Praseh. IUnnReg No. 24992 , , , 4500 Hampton Road. .1 I 03-04-08 . Douglas W. Pagenkopf ...... See Large Size Plans and/or Survey in Planning Department Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) . Date: To: April 14,2003 From: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 4500 Hampton Rd. (03-04-08) Douglas W. Pagenkopf, Applicant ,I Douglas Pagenkopf owns the house and property at 4500 Hampton Rd. (northeast corner of Hampton Rd. and Major Ave.). He is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (S~ction 11.21) in order to allow for the expansion of the garage to three-stalls and living space. The proposal will include a second level addition. Staff has determined that the proposed addition is being added to the rear of the house. (Although the hou.se is addressed on Hampton Rd., the front of the house is Lee Ave. according to the Zoning Code. When the property is on a corner lot, the front of the lot is the narrow side.) The survey that was submitted as part of the variance process indicates that the existing.garage does not meet the rear setback requirement of 25 ft. The following are the requested variances: . · The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(8) Rear Setback. City Code states that the rear yard setback shall be 20% of the lot depth. In the case of the Pagenkopf Jot. thjs setback was determined by staff to be 25 ft. The requested variance is for 16 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point from the proposed attached garage expansion. ' · The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(8) Rear Setback. City Code states that the rear yard setback shall be 20%of the lot depth. In the case of the Pagenkopf lot, this setback was determined by staff to be 25 ft. The requested variance is, for 2 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 23ft. at its closest point from the rear property line for the existing attached garage. (If the Board chooses not to grant the first variance, the Board may grant this variance in order to make the existing house with attached garage legally non-conforming. In the future, conforming additions could then be constructed without any additional variances.) There is an existing shed in the rear yard that is located five feet from both the rear and side property line as indicated on the survey. This is a somewhat unusual lot due to its location along three streets. Although the west side of the property is "legally" the rear property line, it appears more like a side property line. If this were considered a side property line, the setback would be 15 ft. J .. , ,For Office 'Use Only:, ..., " ''1.-.'. . .~;,~. ',i, '. Application No~ ; '. ' , , .' :-':. .' , Date Received'JS~ ...~ ". BZA Meeting.Date..,.'Zz,.., ' Amount Received> "Sb 'City. of Golden Valley !~. . Board Qf Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address Of property involved in this application: If S' 0 () J/ o./f) pt 0 F) Rc<<. cJ "I APPlican~:' . QofICJ. lets ~ %'1GiilkDPP Name . , . t.f&/X) JJ~mpt (1) QoJ 1Jo1c!e>l V~l~nvo~f.?Z Address City/State/Lip ~5' l-bgl-~iJif ,7t:/3-5<i'&cPlL/t...j 'J2-21 O-/~/S- Business Phone Home Phone Cell Phone 2. 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please, name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner 4. To thebestofmy knowledge t/1e statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. ~i~aru~pb1\ Variance Application Submittal: . The following information .must .be submitted by the application deadline to make a ,complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: 1 Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. -L -L A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. i/' A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked QUestions, for an eXPlanat, ion of a "hardship"). Att~h, letter, photographs, Or other evidence, if appropriate. (~ - ~ ~ - cu ~ You may submit detailed description of bU=~).~i~~b~n J/,' this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the. basis of ,any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. . Variance application fee, as follows: @ single 'family residential; $150 - other j .lIIIII '.;;- i \0- .. '. Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the ..signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property ,and directly across the stre~t. If on a corner, this means across both streets. o obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meantonly to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you, have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address; City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the ",. time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be receiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not thatyc:>u necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain 'language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. t1~ 1ff\IS int Name f}~s CJ tt~;C;J.C Comment Signature ~/ JL~~ess Jue~e. ~ls:et~ ~j,?O Jl11'iflJ1\ !it Print Name Comment Signatureq& ~.L{) ~jkJ Address 4~;2. '3 1-1 ~pt-o-n cC.o dcJ .- Ai , Pdnt Name , I .' -; 0 A-N/E {J-L./1<<.5"ElU Comment Signature Jt~ \Addres~S7~ ~~ '. . I, Print Name -1:J~h' 2-12t:JA",\ Comment signature-tk~Q .()-- Address Z G [) ~ Av,-z... 'l---C Print Name /<oN 5od6~a& Comment signatu~ ~M;J{f Print Name L4,^";;\ g "- tt : SSe-I Comment Address 9503 HlrlY1lJliuJ ~d Signature lIQ.n~ i " Address :;;} &,00 f-A~ "u.;"- f\~ ~ 0 Gif/~~ VcJ.f~ ~1~ Print Name r0Ak/ t/[U;~ h . . u/ // . ~/ / / ~.. ~ OtJ2. 1) / , Comment Signature .-. March 31, 2003 . To: City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Jane and Douglas Pagenkopf We would like to do a significant remodeling project on our home at 4500 Hampton Road here in Golden Valley. Because ofthe severe setbacks on our property, we are very limited in our options. We would like to add both living space and garage space. We can add the living space by "going up" with a small "bump-out" in the back of the house. However, with our current restrictions (severe setbacks and an unusual lot shape), we cannot expand our garage space. Therefore, we are requesting a variance on the western side of our property so that we can enlarge our current space which, at only 20 feet, is smaller than standard size and very cramped. We would like to make the garage wider and a little deeper to better accomodate our two vehicles and also be able to enclose our boat, which is currently stored on the side of the garage. Besides practical reasons for an enlarged garage, there are also aesthetic reasons. As you can see from the accompanying drawing, the additional garage space provides a better roof line and more mass on the ground level to better balance the partial second story so that it does not look awkward. Even with the additional garage space, there will still be significant distance to the lot line and our neighbor's house on that side of the lot. Unless we are able to get this variance, we cannot build the project as designed, a project that has received several positive comments from our neighbors, and that we think not only enhances our lives but will benefit both our neighborhood and the City of Golden Valley. It is our chance to positively invest in the future of both. Thank you. " . - ';;~l.l6"'''''" .\ig<n~opi ',,",,:'" , ~, "' . ~1. ., .".'....-''oJ ~31-~ ;/ 1/....,..., l' F. C. cJACKSON L.AND SURVEYOR RE~ISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE WC~!I;D' IlY ottQtNANCl;orr MINNESOTA - .. JOttL Hay As ,.URV_YEO BY ME TH1S_.______DAy 01'___ 1975 A.D. ----:l / / ~- "~/ F c. J,(CKSON. /J , // /'-'1 J ///JIJ! Y/.? t ."....-:?t/ '\., / ~~~' 1,>, /'.' . t~ .:,' ,. r~~ Mll'INE90TA ~GJSTRAT10N. No. / :1 ':_~~ ~~ .---;.......-......-- '.:n-24 SIGNED 3600 .i .-. ~5~2 .. ~ t]J' l'\ 1,,'\ fiT ' :d 10 ~ V\ . / / "!'" tz. f). Ii :" . .,.. , JIl l $. . $~"~~ t . I .f(..__ ___......"~ , . ..' I ~D t.-.ee AVE: . - II::; U' \j .. I ;) ~ '. I i ~- ~ V\ i~ if ~\U )~ ---- (j \J\ m::i U~ ^' m '^ a m Z ~ II .~~~ a~~ ' ~~~ ~.tI\ < 4 , . . . . II .. , ' . , 700 ParkviewTerrace,. , 03-04-09 ,I . Tom & Jennifer Dolan . '. . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: April 14, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning anCt Development I From: Subject: 700 Parkview Terrace (03-04-09) Tom and Jennifer Dolan, Applicants · The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 ft. from the from the front property line. The requested varlance is for 9.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 25.4 ft. at its closest point to the front property line for the existing house. The Board may grant the variance if the Board chooses not to grant the first variance. This would make the existing house legally non-conforming and permit future conforming additions to the house. The applicant has submitted plans and a letter explaining the reason for the request for the variance. The plans indicate that the porch is not enclosed but covered. Staff has provided photos of the existing house in order to provide a perspective of the front setba<;:k of the adjacent houses along Parkview Terrace. A review of the property pddress file indicates that the home was construct~d in 1942. In 1972, an addition was built along with the garage. More recently, two dormers were added in 2001. Staff believes that the stone was added to the house since 2001. If the same policy were in force in 1972 as today, a variance would have been required in 1972 to make the existing house legally non-conforming before the addition and garagewere constructed. ~ . I City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application . . 0- . Application No~:. Date Rec. eived...~...... BZA Meeting Date . . . .. ... . Amount Received. 50.- 1. tklJSSVIG 2. Business Phone .-]17-d-~J Home Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: ~ (j. ~ Print Name of owner Signature ofowner ,. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction oftheaction applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. L ({,~ .... Signature of Applicant Variance Application Submittal: The following information. must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: V Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. ~ A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey \/' requinlmenls. . - A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. V You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. V' Variance application fee, as follows: $50 - single family residential; $150 - other ,Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners ' Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, YQI,J will need to attempt to obtain. the signatures of all surrounding P,roperty owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. t, To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them abol;Jt your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your. project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you .may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ceiving a written notice informing you of the ti~e and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the proje,ct, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. Print Name J(/YJ1JtYIJ..Jv' SebD 'Comment Signature Address 16/ ~ 1 i;},.J {eOL ~."'-."" C', (-feJ{UVl d Print Name Comment _nature 1) fl.. C -JIJJ---~\ .j/~ t~ \ . 2' ?-:; (Yl eo',Lvv LfAr1~. ~,' Address SignalureJY\. ~J E,'r:.~er- ~ .~ Print Name omment Print Name Comment Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment ignature \ k \ -I~'St)~ ''-J~be-~J . "' ~(>,~ ~ <::'~~~?J I' Address '" ~ Pb...rk..V;'e.w kr~ Address 9/1 /IIt~) ~~ ~ !I Address Tt" A'e.,~ i...,~~ ~.. tv\', c r'i\~ \ J t S' ~Q vr\/ ~.-.""^ I c~ \.. S ~/ Address Address rJU fk ~-!<J (~ tV . March 29, 2003 City df Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals RE: Requested Variance Dear Board Members: yv e request a variance from the city of Golden Valley tQ add a covered, un-enclosed front porch to the front of our home. . This porch will greatly enhance the appearance of our home. We have felt that the exterior needed some improvements to increase the level of "curb appeal." We believe this improvement will not only be a benefit to us, but will benefit the neighborhood as well. Homeowners in the North Tyrol neighborhood have a long history of prid~ of ownership, maintaining their homes and making the necessary improvements to maintain or increase their property values. This remodeling job will contribute to the beauty of our home and support the efforts of our neighbors. It will also increase the enjoyment and functionality ofthe home for our family. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, r/~~ Tom and Jennifer Dolan, Homeowners 700 Parkview Terrace Golden Valley,MN 55416 . '. . . WILLIAM D. SCHOELL REGISTERED CIVIL. ENGINEER SCHOELL &. MADSON, INC, ENGINEERS a: SURVEYORS 74130 //8.z':fJ CA~LIS.LE MADSON REGISTE,RED LAND lflJRVEYOR MINN. NO. 4374 SO. OAoK. 7.' WIS, NO. 5..74 IOWA NO. 3705 I NO. OAoIC. II OS MONT. NO. 1742.. .4 ~ ~ }\(.' ~ . I' . . . ~ ,~ ....... ....... ~ \ . ~ MINN. NO. 2aSS SO. OAK 7115 WIS: NO. E..'7S FLORIOA NO. 8271 NO. OAK. .23 MONT. NO. IBIS.it !SO NINTH AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS. MINNESOTA PHONE:~a.. 938.7601 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR:6'Ch'NABEL / RE"/OEL . , . /- = 40' .-_.............. f?/4f ....Zoo ...... Meat? /"". B...... , -........ \ ....... S? '~ ,t\( tt C) (:) ":-- i ," , , ( ; . , ..' ........ \ \ ~,... . ~,,,- \ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY 9F THE BOUNDARIES OF: 'LQf Z/ and The norTh /0 /'1.' or Lor 3J 15/oc.f ~ Pv'415f 7f.r~/ ;0//5'/ AND OF THE LOCATf9N OF ALl,;; BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND. -?:? -d / 7.0 AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS' c;.~ n . DAY OF o../une 19~ If" a/so $I?~ws f-he /ocar/on 'or rile daK4'S as ser .fbr a proposed add/non, '~"" 3";:'..8..---- . ,(J )-" i ; . . M6'4'So ~~~ ..0/41-"/00 Q . \.. .... ~9.._. ,--,\ , \ '....J -\ \._\ ~ . - D6'/7oT-es iroh n7<::V7unupnr se>r o -OC'/7t:1r6's iran /77o/'7urnenf round II -OenOTe.5 JlVooa' .sTaKe (. \~) '-' ~~~7h~~ REGISTERED '-AND SURVEYOR . . & STONE 1 ELEVATION ALE I/S"=1'0" 1/2" SHEETROCK " MIL POL Y MOIST SR R38 KF FG INSUL 2X6 CLG JST IS"OC 2XS ARFTERS IS"OC 15/32"OSS SHTHG 1511 FELT ASPAHL T St:lINGl.ES IX" PINE BEAOEO CLG 2XS Cl.G JST 2XS RAFTERS 15/32"OSB 5HTHG 1511 FEL T ~Hl. T SHINGLES GUTTER lX3 FJ CEDAR FRCIA ---IXS FJ CEDRR FRCIA lXS 113 PINE SUBFACIA 3/S"RC FIR SOFF IT "'-2XI2 BM IX R CEDRR WRRP -I> <I-u.. ,- ,a: 30"X 30"X .....S TONE LOOK CAP 2XS S"'S f':FnAA Tnp AI'lIl VRUL T TO WALL: PINE LOG SUPPORT & BRAC ING '~'""'"', ,_...1 cc DO [JO FRONT ELf~V A TION SCALE 1/""=1'0" NOTES: -CONTRACTOR TO. VERIFY ALL -ADJUST HEIGHT OF PORCH CLG TO ALLOW PORCH ROOF-TO FLOW UNDER UPPER LEVEL OOAHER WNOS -OPT ION ROOF SUPPORTS WI PINE LOGS VS 2X12 (SIZED BY SUPPLIER> - "~:;;~--rLl 'j B ~ -. ......I_..J~:..~-_.J_.J......'-.;:;a:; _ .J: "'J::T L:"~: : .. . . ., ~L',,::Ci.:'.. "~:Ist~f"t1*~f;~SZ5~~~:: EXISTING HOUSE RIGHT ~~LEVATION SCALE I/S"=I'0" '. . . 1/2" SHEETROCK 4 MIL POLY MOIST BR R38 KF FG INSUL 2X6 CLG JST IS"OC 2X8 RRFTERS 16"OC 15/32"OS8 SHTHG IS*, FEL T RSPAHL T SHINGLES . STONE VENEER SYSTEM 7/16"OS8 SHTHG A19 FF F6 INSULI w 2XS STUD (/) 4 MIL POLY MOISTBR 5 U2"SHEETROCK J: l!) ;g; I- !l? x W 30"X 30"X 4"S TONE LOOK CAP 2XS S4S CEDAR TOP RAIL .2X4 S4S CEDAR SUBRAIL 2X2 S45 CEDAA SPINDLES SPACED NOT MORE THAN 4" 2X4 S4SCEDAR BTM RAL '\ lX12 RCEDAR SKIRT 2-2X12 TR.i0 8M _ GRADE POST ~"6 CEDAA DECING 2X~ TR 40 LEDGER t =' ~ TR.i0 JST 16"OC R38 KF FG INSUL I I W,fD8L' 3/8"GAL V r .J:--20"X 20" (4 CS) 1-II2"THERMAX L ~AGS IS"OC '-, CONC BLK COLUMN 1I2"TR.S0 SOFFIT L-l- _ 12"X 42"CONC PIER FT~ 28"X 2S"X 12"CO~C\ FLRIR TO IS"@ BASE FTG W/REBAR S a::W Wu wa: z...J Wo... >w ~o: U.. Ol!) 0:1-_ :1:- WI- >:1: ~(/) ~.!l lX4 PINE BEADED CLG 2X6 CLG JST 2X8 RAFTERS 15/32"OSB SHTHG IS*' FEL T ~HL T SHINGLES GUTTER lX3 FJ CEDAR FACIA lX8 FJ CEDAR FACIA lX6 "3 PINE SU8FACIA 3/8"AC FIR SOFF IT 4-2X12 8M . IX A CEDAR WRAP NOTES: ~CONTRACTOR TO VEf -ADJUST HE IGHT OF I TOALL.OW PORCH R( UNDER UPPER LEVEl -OPT ION ROOF SUPPOI PINE lOGS -VS 2X12 ~ r, . .' . , ' . 1111 Rhode Island Ave.' N. 03-04-1 0 " Jane Rivezzo , , '. . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: April 11 , 2003 Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planlling an1d Development 1111 Rhode Island Ave. N. Jane Rivezzo, Applicant To: From: Subject: Jane Rivezzo, owner of the property at 1111 Rhode Island Ave. N., is requesting a variFlnce from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant came to the City with plans to construct a deck on to the rear of the house. The proposed deck meets building setback requirements. However, a survey was submitted for the property that indicated ~hat the existing home does not meet the front yard setback requirement of 35 ft. City staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in order that a building permit can be issued and construction commenced prior to the issuance of the variance. A "Hold Harmless" letter is permitted only after the applicant has submitted the required survey and application materials. The "Hold Harmless" form is attached. The variance request is as follows: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 ft. from the front yard property line. The requested variance is for 5.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 29.4 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Rhode Island Ave. N. for the existing home. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled for the construction of the house in September 1958. No other pertinent information was found in the file. t I City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office '~se Only:, . " Application No. ; Date Receive,d, ',,3, ~'~, :t', '.' " , BZA Meeting Date ,.z, " , Amount Received" o.'(JIo CASk. 1. Street address of property involved in this application: _JI II lblYiRJ ~ JVp tV . Applicant:' ~ve2-2D Name 2. ~ T~tln1' Y1Vf ~ Address l;~?;}~ {)Q5ZJ Business Phone /w3 -/5L/l/ -l.f5Q1 Home Phone fi:1im lflt~ MJJ!J31f+ City/State/Z' I () [};}15-Cftj{)Q , Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Ja-n ~, (W-e- &W Print Name of owner ,I ~ . Signature of ner -- To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. " JtJvih V~l~ . -- --- Signatur of Applicant Variance Application Submittal: 'The following information, must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: L Completed application form, including signatures of surro~nding property owners. .d1L A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. V A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. ~.s+;.~ ~~ V:>- ~q I +0 r{6pe-y-ti L;l'\.C , A:J.ji~ con~jY'5 ~ to Rtt.VL. You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. /' Variance application fee, as follows: $50 - single family residential; $150 - other ~ ~ I. Slgn~tures of Surrounding Property Owners ' I Note to. the variance applicant: I I As part of the varian~e application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding J?roperty owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across' the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. I, To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to commen~. I If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you ,may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and.place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be eceiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. Print Name -Krn~r:ly f?tide~ Pau.-l PCL,'cier;,( 'Comment Signature Address IW~ ~ait T6~JJGs Print Name Comment r , \ .natur\ Address /1/< '1?hdo I~/u~Gl ;{(/ 1 ~. . ~. Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment ignature . / I' .' . .. I I t 'j s-tlpfX I~ (l..~ i\ IlC1~Lk , -J~-u; . ~) '. i0 ) -js---O]. Address Address Address Address Address t, J ~ S~ . . . .- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FO~: Anthony & Jane Rivezzo 1111 Rhode tsland 'Ave. .tiJ :.1 'Description: 6, Block 13, "W~NNETkA." f I I I "'> 7~ 1.:2. ",-.L- ,JI I / 91~,(, 7 I 1 I / ;'. r ~_. L- , ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ '" , I - 1.5 if ",/,;' '3 f 1/_ l ",r t I . --~. ' Benchmark: , I r / ~} --, --""" / J )10./115 ' TWI7 5T*'~Y F/!/Flm& .HPK~~~. "'_ _ _ _'2.-7 _ _ __\ /605 ~ <111-,1 "", ' I ~: , 15.~ I 911>"7 ~ UJ \ tll ~ tlJ ~ '" 7.0~ ~ ~ C:) < -.:t " ~ I ~ Q ~ ~ q,,,," , -\i1 4/~,9 lC, , I '" /#.I/f-otrS'$9PJI/3oq~ -i · Q , il'l ~IIIIW LINK FE",€.JF ' ! ,xfl/,; I L':/q. __ _' 1.(..'} '1..() .~ I hereby certify that this is ~ true and correct representation of a. survey of the boundaries df the above described land and of the location of all buildings, lif any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or pn said .land. As surveyed by me this ~~~f~~ 2003. r F. !Lemire RLS r Minnesot~ Reg. NO. 13349 4416 Abbbtt Ave. N Robbins~le, MN 55422 Phone: 7163.537-0497 . \ '~~ \ rf\V. VJ _ ;j ......... I.", /."'''f ,",-; '" \ ChI." VI""t Ct'J T/MBL:/.'f D!:,/{ -t=---- - tfo./J/i C~ + _:=-_.~ Me fry'f _-___..~.~ '___ - - "uJ~:' I L 0 f C. I~, - - '" ' ~ I AIJE/4= e+% J(}.rf,I,t " : . .:' ~ :".:" __ --!.:I : --'.J' Ji.;~K.' .'.' ' , '.l'P~""'~.' : l::i. j '-C&Il!l~ '. . 9/~,7 :6tfJm-;I1~US:.:'!IC'iW,-r, ;.".,: ,,"'" ft#1'f....:. " " !.f~>~~.;,.:.:-:. :~\;:<}.:;\::;.~..8~~!,~~...~:.~ J -. iItM,#!P FENCE I I I.n - /H.oo-#i'?P~~(/W - .L J' I <://1..... ... - / ~ j~ {.o- ....' I 211- 110, I (O? TiJIIJ fr'l' FltA/11S IINIC -; .. ! . , 1 j Scale: 1" = 30' o Denotes iron mon~ent xooo.O = Existing elevation Bearings shown are !assumed TNH, NE, N.G.V.D. ; i i Rhode Islabd Ave. No. at Phoenix Street. 1929 adjusfed e~evation = 911.69 feet. '\0 . . 1[1/ /2htxlt. :r:~llveN Street Address - I . . "HOLD HARMLESS' I, \.1..a.Nf2j /ftl-'bO. , am reqr,estil19 the City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) ... (' Qa. . onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. " ---=--- Jam/ RiWZ-2 [) Print Name ~f1'v-f1J1 Signature · 3}Jf:7 LJ ~ Date . City of Golden Valley Staff Signature Ii MK. tv. CrftU(EJ OV<t4r if' ".......,'1 . , '-< ,-... . 4112 Poplar Dr. 03-04-11 ,I . Ryusuke & Merri Lynn Jono ' . . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763~593-81 09 (fax) Date: April 11, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Mark W. Grimes, Director of Plann,ing and Development From: Subject: 4112 Poplar Dr.. (03-04-11) Ryusuke and Merri Lynn Jono, Applicant Ryuskuke and Merri Lynn Jono own the house and property at 4112 Poplar Dr. They a~e requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant came to the City to build an addition to the west side of their house. The addition meets building setback requirements. However,a survey was submitted to the Inspections Department and it was determined that the existing house does not meet the side setback requirement. City Staff has allowed the applicant to sign off ,on a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the construction prior to the issuance of the variance. The City agreed to the "Hold Harmless" letter only after the applicant submitted the required survey and application materials. The signed "Hold Harmless" form is attached. - The variance requested is as follows: The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd.. 7(A) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the side yard setback for lots greater than 100 ft. in width shall be 15 ft. to a side property line. The requested variance is for 7.13 ft. off the required 15ft. to a distance of 7.87 ft. at its closest point to the side (west) property line of the existing house. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in June 1958 for the construction of the house. The gara~e was constructed in a conforming location in 2001. , i ,City of Golden Valley Soard of Zoning 'Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application Application No~ . Date Received ~..ZJ't, . BZA Meeting Date 4.. Zit' Amount Received. . ~"~" 1. 2. Applicant: ' \<. 'l uS LA. \::.e.. Name 1-\\'2- Address Street address of property involved in this applicatio'1: Po-p\o..r Dr-,' V ~ os,J Me v- r \ L'1 flY, Y \\ L 3C",o Business Phone Po ~ \ Ct r br 1 (,--0 1 d~ (\ Val \.e i,M J\J 554;)) " (',CitY/State/ZiP ~12) <g'SC{ - 453::2.- t!~3) 3<g 1-91;{~ C&l~) /4,-8/5C] , Home Phone' 'Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please.name the owner of this property: ' II Print Name of owner Signature of owner To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction ofthe action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. ~'~_~Ir Signature of plicant Variance Application Submittal: The following information, must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application.' If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: ~ Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. ./ A currentor usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handouforrsurvey requirements. ,,/ A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter" photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. -rh.e... hol'Y\~ was 0 ~fncdl~ loL4il w{i-h1f\ IS -H:.tt o~ ~ pr(){}e'-~ l(Y\~ O~ ~ w-e".>t- 'Sld.~, ~~ctt1)"",- <ln~~r:;. ~;: - You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in - this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of .any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. ~ Variance application fee, as follows: $50 --single family residential; $150 - other t. Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners ' I Note to the variance applicant: As part of the varianc;e application process,. you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes an properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. \ To obtain these signatUres, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to ~erify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment~ If you have attempted to conta'ct a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you ,may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of .y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ceiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object.. to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. Print Address 4-2-C() flr..~ Print Name 'Comment Comment _nature . Address 41~> . 16/l~J4~ ..~ ':.' , Print Name ..t?~S~eAr:. S;~k Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name COll;lment Signature Print Name Comment ignature \[);~~~-~ Addres/f/~~ Y~rJ'&V ~\ \J <And V ic to r i Ov \-tCAVV\VV\CH',d No+hDfYle.. ( ~ 0.. It--evV\.-\?\-s ) Address ~ ea..dOL0 La.()B II .......-- '-) {,I, /2 !111: IL tAJ /-; () I . y )/~;b)f Address 3/CtfpJ1 f)J ~;(/j-/Ve 1<: f s [i n j fan1 j I '-i J Not- home.. OY\ c:t a tkmr~ Address ')03 Me Cldow LCl() e... Address . . ~ lIZ' Po?l~ OlL-. , Street Address "HOLD HARMLESS' '. ...l1 e V' r. \ L J (I t'l Jono . am requesting the City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n). onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. . J'1e. (' r I h,nnJDnO Print Name .~'~.r Signature ~L/~L\ / CIty of Golden Valley / Staff Signature 14~~ tv. W {It( Br- '"' J)I~-. ;n--P~l.tl] ;:F-Oe~o/~~, Lf-i-03 Date . '\ t '1 j ~'\ '~ .~ [ ..-.. C/) <( .W 5::E Gi ......." if' ..., ...- )( . "0 ~N en"'- In :!:: '1 r, I\...) ....; -a BW o. ::: en ' ...,rot') 0" ...If' ....N 00 "0 ~o 3iC/) \ " , 120.09(PLAT) N88012' 43"E 120.12(MEAS) .-......-.; ---- - - ---- ~ ~~---- ~--<Io-Q 3. ._-J~JJ(I~""t1.J..Jl.,.. ... ~~ - ..:-.~.~I""IO~ II I I. II ...0...- - - ..-.. (J) '<( W ~ '-' Ll). "1'0 ~ . In ~j ,)( ...- ' ., ,.~ en In . ..., !- '1A I L.t W! "ti :: C 010 0'" o. .- 0.. 0..0 '...I o .... 00 0., Z'C ,'.= LEGEND @ DENOlES SANITARY MANHOLE .~ DENOlES HYDRANT ii DENOTES CATCH BASIN S DENOlES SANITARY SEWER W DENOlES WA TERMAlN ST DENOlES STORM SEWER @ DENOTES. STORM MANHOLE c-o.., DENOTES. POWER POLE 20 10 0 10 20 '40 I. ,I - SCALE I N FEET ; o DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14- IRON PIPE SET IN THE GROUND AND JlARKBD BY LICENSE NO. 24764 · DENOTES A FOUND IRON MONUMENT GARAGE FLOOR IS ASSUJlED TO BE 89.05 --- 000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation +. 000.0 Denotes Existing ElevatIon +(000.0) Denotes Existing ElevatIon Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: LOlS 11 AND 12, GLEN WOOO , TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHERLY 5 FEET. OF FOURTH A VENUE NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS POPLAR DRIVE. NOW VACATED, ADJOINING SAID LOlS 11 AND 12 AND LYING BETWEEN THE EXTENSIONS SOUTH OF THE WEST UNE OF THE SAID LOT 1'1 AND THE EAST UNE OF' SAID LOT 12 ACROSS SAID AVENUE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LOT 13, INCLUDING THAT PART OF THE ADJOINING VACATED NORTH 5 FEET OF FOURTH AVENUE ,LYING BETWEEN EXlENSlONS ACROSS THE EAST AND WEST UNES OF SAID LOT .. 13, GLENWOOD, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. o ,., And the location of all buildings, If any, thereon. and all visible encroachments. if any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me 1hZ day of ~.... . _ ~ R ....."../ Gary R. Gennond Ucensed Land Surveyor. Minn. Uc. No. 24764 REVISIONS I BY c.)1~ lS~ It, t \ \mTi. I.. ;'>.00\'3 T ffE..;."l ~ z ~ji >- 0 C,;. I.IJ Z<~ >~OO ~~~=;)i :;:) CJ)Cr.:lZ~ >-1.IJl::&dZ ~~P>C <<UJ~ co.. z~~~~ 5o..~~~ In ~D )1 DRAWN DAVID SERRANO CHECKED GRC . DA~ 07/17 00 SCALE (AS SHOWN) , JOB NO. 4346-001 .