The URL can be used to link to this page

05-27-03 BZA Agenda e e e Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - April 22, 2003 II. The Petitions are: 7900 Wesley Drive (03-05-12) Dale John & Claire Joseph. Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 12.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 22.01 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Wesley Drive for the existing garage. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a deck addition to the existing home. 2012 Mendelssohn Avenue North (03-05-13) Jill Robbins, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setbacks . 4.44 ft. off the required 23.44 ft. to a distance of 19 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed deck addition. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed deck addition to the rear of the existing home. 1301 Zealand Avenue North (03-05-14) Carv Lee, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 29 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Plymouth Avenue for the proposed addition. . 0.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 34.1 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Zealand Avenue North for the proposed addition. . 4.1 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 30.9 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Zealand Avenue North for the existing home. e Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a proposed addition. 1336 Quebec Avenue North (03-05-15) Gary Goetz, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 19.7 ft. off required 35 ft. to a distance of 15.3 ft. at its closest point to the front (west) property line for the existing house along Quebec Avenue North. . 17 ft off required 35 ft. to a distance of 18 ft. at its closest point to the front (west) property line for the proposed mudroom and garage addition along Quebec Avenue North. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a mudroom and garage addition. e 255 Louisiana Avenue South (03-05-16) Dan and Mindv Ribnick, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(8) Rear Yard Setbacks . 2.8 ft. off the required 26.8 ft. to a distance of 24 ft. at its closest point to the rear (east) property line for the proposed 2-story addition. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed 2-story addition. 1600 Rhode Island Avenue North (03-05-17) Duane Hamilton, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . 0.2 ft. off required 15 ft. to a distance of 14.8 ft. at its closest point to the north side property line for the existing home. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks e . 0.5 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 34.5 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line for the existing home. 2 e e e Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a conforming 3- season porch addition to the rear of the home. III. Other Business A. Election of Officers IV. Adjournment 3 . Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals April 22, 2003 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Monday, April 22, 2003, in the Council Conference Room 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Sell called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Chair Sell, Members McCracken-Hunt, Ovsak, Smith and Planning Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were Director of Pia d Development Mark Grimes and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittma era was absent. Chair Sell introduced Crystal Ovsak who is the new a r member and will be replacing Bob Lang. I. Approval of Minutes - March 25, 2003 MOVED by Smith, seconded by Shaffer and mo March 25, 2003 minutes with the above no The Petitions are: McCracken-Hunt referred to page three, paragraph tw . "implied" should be changed to "applied". II. . 2900 Cherokee Place (0 Dan and Lisa Jacobso Request: n 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks required 35 ft. to a distance of 17.2 ft. at its closest . e property line along Culver Rd. for the addition. e required 35 ft. to a distance of 21.3 ft. at its closest the side property line along Culver Rd. for the existing 14.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20.1 ft. at its closest point to the side property line along Culver Rd. for the existing house. To allow for the construction of a dining room, mud room, family room addition to the existing home. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings · 4.5 ft. off the required 10ft. distance between the house and garage at its closest point. . Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed addition to be too close to the existing garage. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 22, 2003 Page 2 . Grimes explained the variance requests. He suggested the Board grant the second variance request listed (13.7 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 21.3 feet at its closest point to the property line along Culver Road for the existing garage) with or without the first variance request being granted to make the garage legally non- conforming which would permit conforming additions to be added to the property in the future. Grimes stated that the property has a shed on it located in a utility ease has talked to the applicant about moving it five feet away from the pr would move it out of the easement as well, and that the applicant s Sell asked the applicant if the proposed addition needed to b is shown on the survey they submitted and if the south side in line with the existing house and garage. s fir t and then she es of the variances ddition back four feet in the n to the back in order to get ddition shown on the survey e maple tree there. Daniel lines up with existing bedrooms. . Lisa Jacobson, applicant, stated that she is askin plans on hiring an architect to design the additio she is granted. Sell asked if they could move th front so that it would line up with the garag the same square footage. She explaine doesn't line up with the house becaus Jacobson, applicant, added that th McCracken-Hunt asked how la Jacobson said it does not shown on the survey are stated that they did keep about the size of th rop p is and if it went over the garage. Lisa age. McCracken-Hunt asked if the dimensions lans. Lisa Jacobson stated no. Daniel Jacobson f a dining room table, etc. when they thought level. Lisa Jacobson stated yes and that they want the g architecture of the house. has given some variances in the past for garages being too bu ey are usually for existing conditions, not when granting the ates the issue. He said that that he also did not want to make the setback condition worse than it already is. He stated that he thinks this in line with the garage and the house which still requires a variance but one. Smith asked the applicants if they had some flexibility since they don't have a plan. Lisa Jacobson stated that they do have flexibility, and that the character of the house and neighborhood are important to her but she wants to make her home more livable and she doesn't think that the addition they are proposing would put the home out of place with . what is in the neighborhood. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 22, 2003 Page 3 . Shaffer asked the applicants if they thought it would be to their advantage to table their request in order to hire an architect or designer to draw up some more concrete plans. McCracken-Hunt said that the Board is usually reacting to plans and that the dimensions they are requesting now may change. Lisa Jacobson said that they want to see the area they can build in before they hire an architect to draw the plans. Smith asked the applicants if they could move the addition back four fe Lisa Jacobson said that would cover up two bedroom windows. closest point to the side McCracken-Hunt said that she would also feel more comfortabl addition aligning with the house and garage. MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Smith and motio the following variance requests: . . 15 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 2 property line along Culver Rd. for the additio . 14.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a dis property line along Culver Rd. for t . 4.5 ft. off the required 10ft. to and garage at its closest po' between the proposed addition Shaffer voted against the garage is a Building Co se the need for ten feet between a house and a from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Setbacks ~ off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 9 ft.atits closest point to the rear property line from the proposed attached garage expansion. . 2 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 23 ft. at its closest point from the rear property line to the existing attached. garage. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed garage expansion. . Grimes stated that there are two variance requests for this proposal in case the Board doesn't approve the first variance request for the proposed attached garage expansion the other request would make the existing attached garage legally non-conforming. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 22, 2003 Page 4 . Grimes discussed the requested variances and stated that this property is unique because it has streets on three sides and that the rear yard acts like a side yard. McCracken-Hunt asked if statt had talked to the applicant about how the City views variances for third stall garages. Grimes stated yes. Douglas Pagenkopf, applicant, said he understands that the Board is not so inclined to approve a variance to go from a two-stall garage to a three-stall garage are from a one-stall to a two-stall. He stated that he has a boat outside t like to store in a garage. He stated that their current garage is small at 2 e feet long and even with the proposed expansion it wouldn't be an ov bu . He said that the existing house has one bedroom and that the pr monumental. He said having the third garage stall would gi and would make the house more marketable in the future an neighborhood a lot. He added that the neighbor next to would be 57 feet away from the proposed garage Smith asked the applicant if he planned to build Pagenkopf stated no and that it would be t urse. Pagenkopf said it of concrete in his yard. . Ovsak asked the applicant if the drive would change minimally because h Shatter stated that typically the garages into side yard setb hardship is that the appli for that. He said he likes but that he could note f far beyond what the o roved variance requests for third stall he is concerned in this case because the only t the boat inside and the code does not allow at it does look good with a three car garage ause it doesn't meet the Zoning Code and it goes too ed to do. t esn't appear that any expansion of the garage could hatter stated that he didn't have any problems with the 2nd on the property. McCracken-Hunt suggested acknowledging ar property line, but it feels like a side yard it so as to not set a . g a third stall garage into the side yard setback. Shatter said he ould be enough to help the situation but he would agree with that. would allow him to build more. McCracken-Hunt said it would allow the lid up to 15 feet to the property line. . Shatter asked the applicant if that would help him. Pagenkopf said that's not going to help and that if he bought a half a million dollar home he would get a 3-car garage. He said that there are some 3-car garages already in his neighborhood. Shatter said the City doesn't have anything against 3-car garages. McCracken-Hunt added that they just have to be within the setbacks. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 22, 2003 Page 5 . Smith said he could sympathize with the applicant wanting a 3rd garage stall but that hiding a boat isn't considered a hardship. Rick Christensen, architect for the project, asked if anything could be built in the setback area. Shaffer said that no building structure could be built. Christensen asked about roof overhangs. Grimes said 30 inches of overhang can go into the setback area. Christensen said he is concerned with the way the architecture would work with the way the house is laid out. MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Smith approve the following: t to feet. Sell asked Christensen if the Board were to allow the applicant to the property line how much space that would give him. Shaffer Shaffer noted that there should also be a front yard setbac Major Avenue. Grimes agreed that that variance was missed. . · 4 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance property line to the existing attached · 10ft. off the required 25 ft. to a d' property line from the propos st point from the rear its closest point to the rear nd 2nd story expansion. Shaffer amended the motio unanimously to approve distance of 25 ft. at its closest point to the front yard e for the proposed garage expansion. er from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks 15.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 19.4 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Parkview Terrace for the proposed porch addition. · 9.6 ft. off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25.4 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Parkview Terrace for the existing house. . Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed porch addition to the existing home. \j Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 22, 2003 Page 6 . Grimes explained that the applicants are requesting to build a covered porch addition that would be about 19 feet into the setback area. He stated that the other homes in the area probably aren't setback 35 feet either, but that this one is a little closer. He said he is recommending that if the variance isn't granted for the porch that the second variance request listed above be approved so that the existing house will be made legally non-conforming. Shaffer asked the applicant to address the hardship. Dolan stated that hardship that they want to add more curb appeal to make it fit the ne' make more use of their front yard. Shaffer said the fact that curre is currently 25.4 feet from the front property line could be consi that the Board has been approved open porches. Smith stated that the fact that the proposed por less in regard to the site line, than if it were a cl makes it stick out McCracken-Hunt said her concern is that the house is very c and that the proposed porch addition will bring it c10s . Shaffer asked the applicant if he could proposed six by bringing all of it back house steps in a bit and questione . said the porch could step in too. eet wide instead of the age. Dolan stated that the till look right. McCracken-Hunt MOVED by Smith, second request for 15.6 ft. off th the front property line alo nd motion carried unanimously to approve the to a distance of 19.4 ft. at its closest point to ace for the proposed porch addition. r from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks · 5. . off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 29.4 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Rhode Island Ave. N. for the existing home. To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements. . MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by McCracken-Hunt and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 5.6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 29.4 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Rhode Island Ave. N. for the existing home. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 22, 2003 Page 7 . 4112 Poplar Drive (03-04-11) Rvusuke and Merri Lvnn Jono. Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . 7.13 ft. off required 15 ft. to a distance of 7.87 ft. at its closest point to the side (west) property line for the existing house IV. Adjournment Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance wit requirements. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Ovsak and motion carried the request for 7.13 ft. off required 15 ft. to a distance of 7. the side (west) property line for the existing house. III. Other Business Sell discussed the re-election of the Chair positi election at their next meeting. Shaffer sug the agenda next month and then switc . . Sell asked Ovsak to introduce her members introduce themselves Board should hold an lection at the beginning of beginning. . .'; ~.. . 7900 Wesley Drive 03-05-12 . Dale John & Claire Joseph . . . . Hey Planning 763.593.8095 I 763.593.8109 (fax) Date: To: May 19, 2003 Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development 7900 Wesley Drive (03-05-12) Dale John and Claire Joseph, Applicant From: Subject: Dale John and Claire Joseph own the house at 7900 Wesley Drive (northwest corner of Wesley Dr. and Winnetka Ave.). They are requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21) in order to allow the construction of a conforming deck on the rear of their home. When the applicants came to the Inspections Department to get the building permits necessary for the construction, it was determined that a survey was needed first to indicate the existing location of the buildings on the property. A survey was prepared and submitted indicating that the existing house and shed do not meet building setback requirements. Therefore, variances would be needed prior to construction of the deck. As part of preparation for this memo, staff visited the site. Digital photos were taken. In this case, it was determined that all buildings were not shown on the survey despite directions given to the surveyor. You will notice when you visit the site that there is a second shed along the west side of the house. This shed does not meet setback requirements. The applicant has indicated that the shed in the rear of the yard will be moved to a conforming location prior to the issuance of any building permits for the deck. Staff recommends the same requirement for the second shed along the west side of the house. (Sheds must be located behind the main dwelling, at least ten feet from the dwelling, at least 35 ft. from any street, and at least five feet from a rear or side property line.) The Planning staff has asked the Inspection Department to look at the site to determine if there are any violations related to outside storage. The recreational vehicle appears to lack a license. Recreational vehicles must be properly licensed in order to be stored by the owner on their property in the Residential zoning district. These matters will be addressed outside the variance process. The variance requested is as follows: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 ft. from the front property line. The variance requested is for 12.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 22.01 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Wesley Drive for the existing home. The City's file on this property reveals that the house was constructed in 1956. The City approved the location of the house at that time. 8030 Cedar Avenue South Suite 228 Bloomington, UN 55425 . Phone (952) 854-4055 Fox (952) 854-4268 'e> ^ 1"" Scale: 1"=30' I I \" V I W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. WOODROW A. BROWN, R.L.S. President NORTH Survey For: Dale John 916.7 x r3.0 o.~ 135.30 ~161~ I 26.2~ ~.7~ ---i 920A'.t. 2.3.8 iri d _ _3'L 924.3 O! I \01 0.2 30 I- C)) 00 O~ "":0 OT"'" ..... T"'" w ::) Z W > <( <( ~ I- W Z J __43.~__ _ ~6.54_ _ ../' 914.9 \ 921..3 ~ 30 TC 913.9 o ,., - - o ,., )( Fence . Denotes Iron Monument Found o Denotes Iron Monument Set Benchmark: Top Nut Hydrant @ Winnetka and Olympia Elevation=926,4 7 WESLEY DRIVE NOTE: No Search Was Mode For Any Easements. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION All of Tract "J" Registered Land Survey No. 13 Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lying south of the North 3.0 feet thereof I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om 0 duly Registered Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. . WZ~::J Woodrow A. Brown. R.L.S NO. 15230 Dated: April 30, 2003 54-03 SO/56 "-,I of . . -10 ..s::> o c;.. L- g- .; ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ " a g. ~ ~ iI ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ 'j ~ i:i \-," ~~.,~~-- ~~~r 'u'_'" 1 ./ ! ... \ ~ i i i , ,; ii /-' ". (, "J \ . . . ~ ~ .- '" t-:;' 'i.: ~ ~ . ..- w 3.1X!O GREEN TREA'l'ED BEAM SITS ON 6X6BOLCIC ANKO:RED TO CEMENT.WALL OF BOUSE r- l'-2I... :~ 1'~ 1+'" I I I ~ j~ I h~-b [:'1 = r- ~~ 1m DREEN FOR DECK 81 1'.4~ _ -!!!::!l.18~ L . roo GREEN TREATED u:DOER wrm 318"X 4 112- LAO WlTB:JJ8" WA.SBBR.16- o.c. 2X10 01U!:BN TREATED ItIMNAJLED TO 10JST (NO BANaERS) ...!!::!JI!l" __JL ~ -~- _29'.!.!!!:- . WINDOW ~~t.. 'tJ. 2Xl2 GREEN TREATED STRnfGElt. ,'2X4 aIiUQ!N T.R&4.TBD POI. PINCH BLOCX ::L=~TED I =~~~AO:~l:; AND A TRlADl011l~1 AND THE TREADS WllLBE TWO DECKBOARDS TOTALmO 11~. lBAV1NO 1/1- UP ~I- "..3318" I P~Yi~ ~ t-: ~ .J' ~ V / -'" -i ~ ~ r J~ I i EXISTING PATIO L.._.._.._ . . . . ill lit l!l :;,* A deckwouid [II ~'fa.Gew..h, ero{. :~! J ... +h . i]l CrAr1 [lCt e r !ulv.L fine ~D 1 C"-I.. . II~Our: home 'i5 0.. {o.w. level 5fL f hOtd5e, If i5 iil t:7;~~::,~e 11~/Ot)u:~!:~1~d ~5 cYJe !i!LeJ~L'j;'o~-f~/ ry1floor -IfJ;o'A arL {~m;', ill film 'ii.....lJi pN d If 15 ~ Ui Ie fA WiJ/!z -l5f"'la, t i~r ~n Adv,0 or Sic~ Fuson '" . , , ilf*' ~ deck. _.{)Jo~/d rid0 Jrn roue ti flow -tfu.62u..f- .Ut 1:l~ ruor>lJ~f Ou.. ,home' . 111*. A deck "wOuJ[muCllsu j (}CI~e<-t Se Tk- u~lu-e. of...... II! Illourho:-M5-e. Q./}-'"t"J. ~1'ljr'Lh vlt~ {v ~ U(AJL{~ 1/\ oJ ..O~lY- .l1e,~c)hbor\1QQcI.. III J J il! m li! ijl Ill. lif II, lit .._,,'!.! ii ':-1 .. it-I IP i1i .. .-r'r.. Iii ,!i iiiR lil r &ASonS \ii- !!! 1 ~ ~ ! I ~ tit 'iill !IU"IYle r S I, !11..A 'd' PC: 55. ..,(j. . ~q II! i 1 ~ jU i!l I!; .rt ;d fDr Fr r~u~S+ihJ It dec-(. Cl ~r'lo.. nee... llile :kh h 1 Cjc{,r~ 79 DO We.sJelj J>1Z ' Go IJ.e h Vctlle-~I /VIAl 7{Q'j ~5-f' 2 - q 017 . Lse.ll.- 55/j'27 frol/ij~ a 'l>lwd needed the. -{(11011) t . and {rlends ()41d t tljO :;1: A e Sea.. 50 (1-' Q f Jh~ k i~"' :DC\/e Jtht1 CJaice. JOSLf~ J\, City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application No. . Date Received BZA Me.![ltlngDate Amour'll ~eceived.. 1. J!1oo 7qoo f)('s!<, L1 Address J UIJ- 57'6- )) 8' 6 Business Phone Jas91-- Va J I~ M iJ fp/d- 7 ty/State/Zip 7'f3 Jj 1/- - '10-'17 Ii /J.. - 518' - Z I '6'0 Home hone .. Cell Phone ) r;lrlLh 2. 3. If the applicant is not the o.wnf' of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: . II / IJ . , . Print Name of owner Signature of owner To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. /1 / 1 t~ j Variance Application Submittal: The following information. must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete ap7on. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: _ Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. ~current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. ~ brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. J - Variance application fee, as follows: $50 - single family residential; $150 - other .. Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the, signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the, I time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ceiving a written. notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. LI~NlQr1N1~ ~ ~nrvJ ~ ~ ~ Signature ~~ ~ t/4J.1 j). J/~L ~I @ Print Name Comment Address I ~ f6 tulY)f7efkn- I1zJ A) Print Name Comment .nature Jdilf~'P~~ Address 7950 tVfjeu t+ ,'tf0 -'" omment #t-evt -F 0150Vl .J)z.c.k tS GyaeiX .. Print Name Signature ~~4~ Address i12LJ V~ , /I / (\'/1 Print Name -1V41)f'-/-k lLQI/ r7 Or Comment Le-/-. +hPn1 ,'~ (JrrJ Lie L! j), I Signature Y~#i!?/J1P"J /1 f I I a " / :-tl ey !AlQ /1f . Address / 7D / ~ irlrf3: fl-w printName!HeN~ 1111. V A.w. Comment L;:: 1 [v\s../\/"\ {-:://v :ru~ .jv~ ( vl\.lVt'1 e t/ \ d -/-- U\i\; NN-.J2 ~o~ A 0- Signature ell ~vr1lf Address 1ft ( I tv i~rNfrt4 Ar.F rl, Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment .gnature Address " , . 2012 Mendelssohn Ave. N. 03-05-13 . Jill Robbins . , . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: May 19, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. <;3rimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 2012 Mendelssohn Ave. N. (03-05-13) Jill Robbins, Applicant Jill Robbins owns the house at 2012 Mendelssohn Ave. N. This home was constructed last year and was recently occupied. The landscaping on the site has not yet been completed. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The rear yard setback variance would permit the construction of a 10ft. by 12 ft. deck off the second level of the house. The survey clearly indicates that a proposed 10ft. by 12 ft. deck would extend into the required rear yard setback. The applicant was told by the Inspections Department thata small landing area extending five feet into the rear yard off the second level patio door would be permitted without a variance. The applicant has decided that she would like to have a larger deck off the patio door in order to provide enough space for a table and chairs. The variance request is as follows: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(8) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states that the rear yard setback shall be 20% of lot depth. The variance requested is for 4.44 ft. off the required 23.44 ft. to a distance of 19 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed deck. The City's file on this property reveals that the building permit for the construction of this house was issued last year. 0> <D """'" o z >- ~ :r: w I- ~ I- (J) o fie Z G52,25 . r W )... I :::> ~ 1 Z)... I ~!,L I W!:ct"5 I 4'J~ I > ~~ 1 <(?E- I CI: I Z ~~ I o ~li: I (J) k~ I W Q::l( I ~ f(.~ ..). o ". j.' Z~~.. 1 W I "<::: l_.._ ..,e;. 954,10 t/c /-" \ \ " \ \ I \ \ I \ \ I \ \ I \ , ~ 1 \ I r 'Zi. +~ I \ I / \ 1 -J I " 1, ....'" I 8..tree-..,~q4J.4)j '-....__ I "I ---fl4i?~--/-' "I ".- ~, ! r::::::::l - --9# j ,~...._-- I -~.... WI 1 , I ( ....)-J..I . I I I! -J I Jt garage -r- \ '8"<l~~~L~f~~;".'l <( I \ -", ""''''''- --..." I -,\ 1__- ~ 9.7 /,~Ii -~---- " I 1\ --- I \ I -- \ I ~ 'I '.9~ \! ~1l '" I shed I \ i",- \ 'f ~--___ \ \ IF--- R.. \_-...1.:_ '.U". garage :le' I I I I I " I -..a"'L') , ./ ~~'C7-____ ___- - -- .CI ... ::J <..1 /.--------- top b I k 958.1 1/2 S FRAME N 0.2008 I~\4{ "~~'.DvD Lot 19, Block 4, LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS except that part of said Lot taken for road right of way purposes, located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by chen I We hf'reby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a surver of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments. if any. from or on said land SignedQlO 1 C1Cl?~ . Charles F. Anderson. Minn. Reg. No.21753 or Gregory R. Praseh. Minn Reg Na...24992 Su rvey. bv IJ!': t his._YHh day of _~pril .__.____. 20. 02 ;+- e . . . ~~lt, eJ .. (iVH..JJl tJ~ "~t.. r\ftfJ6Q3 ~--, NfHLS " ,.. ~{.... i~,1 2 Gn ~ W'e.., C\o;~ ~\-' -..-t:J--tj.- ----- '14:: .! ,. \ -- ,.- -- ..~~.>- ,: ".;I ~ 10 3. GFtl. \(p.O lZ'\ o...c,,- l;'Kb POS"1> z..x '2.. ~, 'S('l vJ)!..e '" 4t,~ 'I'M, \~ ~ ~t1C\~~ !' I tl ~ I i I i ~ I ! ~- ~\fo~r ~ f\~\ tz to(rrl\U~ '-rZ' ~ lb" ~e.5 F'\ -1 ! ' ~,~ ,,~ ~~ ;,;,-; ;". t~ 1 jY)frY t., ( 2003 . i-f,j '111 i.1 %-~! In J'~':I m O:'j-'l l~;:i C IT,( 0 F <OOU:>oU \.IY'\U.-O( . il i PLJ!.It-SE... ftU-O t.U ~ 'TO Pvr 01\J ft- . +~ti In . (0)< \2.. 0Bcr oFF (Yl '( LJ ppce.. LQ/a.. (.>M1 0 ::ro t'V'\ n. . r -~'i 'j '-VF- ... 1[1 ! ~; 1M '(. Ll.I:<t. # N"P' i . ~ ~().~"",~1'"1""') ~, ~. ~ __..., !-ii';:~ I#L _ rlvv~ fJV"'"'1<";> ~T7I";'~ ~~ V~ ~c:.. 't#* iJl (5'-( ~~ €'UIU)Ci?. ()1,t:e,. ~ _ 'TTte ~~5' m Pur It llP(>CL LQJa...... Pm-ro ()OOl!:. eJf=F TlfC5 l']-~ ;:: ~I TQ10J '1l> Pu-:Jf.J ~.4 tJB:tC- . III wtfOV s /7PPLXar(J FOe- ff PC/U1 IT- ::J;" l).fi5: i ;:;,~ ;q {Ow ~ a-;vt..l) ()AJC( l~ A-. 5" pee~ Ii) oFF eerte... DEcAt7sc cP se.r ~1!Cc.. m It 5 I lJEtv ..:cs tit) A '( 1"""0 ~(Yl fit.J- trJ. l:~.:j 'H PUT f+ ~13 (L fJ-te.J() cr-tfit2.S C '-.J 'TO &'>Q't)t(. in m .::r: )-(fltJe.. 'THe. WAU- OIJ /(;,9 OIJ' Ttt5 ;\t:i lU we~T oF- M v J~e f7tJ().. I r l~. U~y Hi N6ISE..Y TO ~fT It) '71tE-. .~ (j~ Tl~ ~. l~;~ m ()~e:. &u.c>Wtl1e. TO PlfrQu. A lOXI<?:.. III O~. 0-..> 'Tl-fC. Caacrr S.loe Od.A_~r."\ ~ f11 "" it~~ s;;::...I l?' ~<...z.:J~ I l~N Ul \-fc>~ fOe-THIS ~ " ~S<''''' ~1n J::~tt '.i4 UJ ';till,:,: ~ 1ft .~ . ....~il . T~L{oCJ ~~~(JtU$ . .,. .- City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office .Use Only: . Application No. . Date Received ... .... ~. BZA Meeting Date S .;'~> Amount ~eceived. ... .~ 1. Street address of property involved in this application: dO/J- !Yfz~. .. <)~f] 1t.~)J, bn/PJ/J ~ liIIt.55. 'V~( J f;B .! . Applicant: f. 1// obi} / fl<S .. . . .' Name 2. dO/d~ Address ~~) Business Phone Home Phone 1- 001/Jf/1{Oq Y Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: .' Print Name of owner Signature of owner To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. Variance Application Submittal: The following information. must be submitted by the application deadline to mqke a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: JcomPleted application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. /A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. /A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship Which provide grounds for th~ granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. / You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s)invblved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the. basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit . is issued. Lvariance application fee, as follows: ~- single family residential; $150 - other . Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the, signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property, and directly across the street. If on a comer, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meantonly to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, OWner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the,. time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: ~iS.. is an application by your neig. hbor for a variance from the City Zoning COde.. Please be aware Q.f .y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You. will also be receiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regardi~he pro;ect. Print Name b-/i / / /-. /l X -5 tJ fr Comment Signature JJ(taj)d),c7f~J A~r~~ 1 Ji'~;J~1~A~ I/v Print Name C~ r-t . I'W ~\I Comment .nature Address ~llL --t1uJ,J ~kv. .... , Print Name omment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment .gnature w/z,~/> I . /1IjA'~ ~fc 'Address ,,{&CJ f 'HGl1~~ ~\:?~ ~ AddressPfJ!J ~ _ ~ p Address Address Address .,," . 1301 Zealand Ave. N. 03-05-14 . Cary Lee . . . . Hey Planning 763.593.8095/763.593.8109 (fax) Date: May 19, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 1301 Zealand Ave. N. (03-05-14) Cary Lee owns the house and property at 1301 Zealand Ave. N. (northwest corner of Zealand Ave. N. and Plymouth Ave.). He came to the City to apply for a building permit in order to construct a 20 ft. by 24 ft. addition to the south end of his house. Because there is no current survey for the property, a survey was required to determine if the construction could be done without the need for a variance. The survey submitted by the applicant indicates the proposed addition will require a variance from the Zoning Code (Section 11.21). Also, the survey discovered that the existing house and detached garage do not meet building setback requirements. Staff also discovered that there is a shed on the property that does not meet setback requirements. The shed is attached to the house and deck and is adjacent to the house. Sheds are required to be located behind the house and at least 10ft. from the house. Sheds must also be located 5 ft. from a rear or side property line and at least 35 ft. from a front property line. The applicant has indicated that the deck and shed will be removed this summer and replaced with a patio. The following are the requested variances: · 6 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 29 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Plymouth Ave. for the proposed addition. · 0.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 34.1 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Zealand Ave. for the proposed addition. · 4.1 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 30.9 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Zealand Ave. for the existing home. A review of the City file on this property indicates that the home was constructed in 1963. H Cl vJ 5 ~1 ipS l' 0.1 e Vv1 e VI l' C Qlty Lef 130 ( 2 e a I a", J fJ lie. . OUV' f'l'ope.,iy ts Ovt a Cov-lIIe;- w/f~ fwr; Si tJeJ afoul' Slvee1s. The side o'F + Lte fv-e fosecR. aMi i,of,l, Is fo i ~e S'CItA1 t., of' f ,^e ..I2)Ci sj; /It?lttOH1~ a {Ok? f I)' IA1d/)jir Ifve. Duv ~o VI1e g {15 o ill {}till a"fypica/ lot-. T~e lof /5' Q iffciok)ul()v s/;tofe INrit. T~e ~lt'eaiev leh1fh heilftr fvoV&t S'1'ole 10 stcte //let fvol/lt fo b()ch~ 1~'5 lof slAafe fVld hOP'ke fOSihtJh lI!1a/1es coVls'fvL/.cfro", to fhe Ileal( of fhe heJuSe ..f.ktVlw.ely dtf'(rc.'vJ"f. COVtS 7V'ftc1-rov. 10 fhe I{'eav (rr f ~e [;.fJUS( woulJt >l11II! f~e ~ouJe ollM.o.rt lAf fo the veav Iliff Ii he of fhe 10 'f. Th;s would cui OUr alv-eQJy lt10V"'OLv D~c1 9'('tuJecR boctc yara j/ll half. [ollls7vucftClv. ]0 f~e V10lrth (5 l~pOSlible oI.ue Yo fke pvope'l'1y hl/fe 10 close 10 ft.e b-tovse. Also) ac1cPiHy fo . T~e Vtc>v'llA of fhe ~OLue woufd /Aofhe a f,,()c'ftral o clcli'/ltlVl 'fa f~e ..eY;Sif'lAy layout of f~t IttOV.5f. (ol-tsfvwjJolA 10 ihe .fas 'j- lA!o/..llcl V'E~(.IiVe a 9V'i()i~ va viClwce {vc//II.1 crly .Pe1bochs. At ih~5 fO/l"d we l-tOUf Ct /o",?e QIMOf)IA't of /ItflOlAey Qiltot. lime illlves'lecl Ill!. fla~S' Ct",d Suvvey5 fo'l' COv,s7vut1lok. '/0 ilte scw:j h. Fov f~e)e V't>aJo\otS w~ Clve ash;.,.? 1'0V' a. VOvr'CifA(f fvo~ c.l'/y sef hocltJ. Tha"., If YOlA1oV' YOUii' tOIllSH) fret iJo VI! . ~WUA Car y L.~e Ct...cl f~vw;ly . . . . . . City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: . . .. Application JIIO. . Date Received 5 "'(,.,>d~o3. BZA MeetingDateS <z..:-r '. Amount ~eceived .~Oi.'J GA$ '- 1. Street address of property involved in this application: _(301 2ea{0\t1d IIVf, ;1/ )Gofde~ Applicant: Ca rv W f 1/; a WI Lee Name / Vall~y ) /'1 AI' S~.>Y2 7 2. {jOt 2eo tOl1el Address !/vp ,AI ~. l/ I / /1 /l/ )5'Lf 2- ? City/State/Zip G /2- '-flq~ filJ Business Phone 7~J- ~-YO- 0fy'f Home Phone Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: II Print Name of owner Signature of owner To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. ~~ Signature of Applicant Variance Application Submittal: The following information. must be submitted by the application deadline to mGlke a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: J Completed application fOnTI, including signatures of surrounding property owners. ~current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey req uirements. J A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for th,e granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. J< .- You may submit detailed description of building(s}, addition(s}, and alteration(s} involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the. basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. ~ Variance application fee, as follows: G single family residential; $150 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the I signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property, and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the II time and place of the 8ZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of .y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You, will also be ceiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. Print Name ~{ut L. R I le,rUVl/l , Comment Signature ~~ Address J 305" 2 i!C/C(VlJ !lvp, AI Print Name 7)41//9) 5#1/"/4 Comment .nature ~.!ft ~:Jt~ Address ~52~- fIY~o~d h /+ve. tJ , ,Print Name Comment Ctu/l<~ ~- c4r~1eo I Signature ~..-,-. F (!~ Print Name Comment Signature' I r!r(1'1ff1A b, T/+lYrLtJ.sOFJ , Print Name ( 'b}'N\ \B kl- '""" J Comment Signature J~wv PoL Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment t1gnature 'Address 5r'S-(~ Pit VV\.CJlA.-rZ 4u-- Address ;3t'):) {!ff$I---U; e;-r Address t;(540 PI Y ktfT vd/" ;1,,/, N, Address Address . . . . ......-......" \--- (...;/,1' Corner of Lot ././ ~ \ ~ '-1 \<::)~ ~(:) L~ ~ ~ ~^I ~ 98.![J ~7 r \--)}() I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY - PHEPABEDJiVR. June & Cary .Lee o~ l(, ~llJ il' ~(\('I f '\ /(J.l~ I '- Y r-- ~~. '-. SOO~O~5~ ./' 06? 00 () J ~ ~ .57 9,"~ r.{....." il~;; I */ ,,+ ~. q ~ ~~ ~~ "''-1 ~ (:) .~ -...: ~ ~ ~ .... ~~ .. ~ t\.. 'q; ~~ ,,... ~ ~~ ~I\. vs~ <:s ~ c:::> .~ R) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I eft? f"o(lCr . v '"ewor [Jr'v ~ l~~ /; ID ~,~ ,/~ iX ~~ ,/ ,/ ~ \.,.... I ~f . - ., .v- qfJ'!J' d X 34.1 ; ~ : t~!fo~~r~ 0 j -J \ #" , .1899-2 ", f:~ t ~0 ~ I C \ if \\ J"E Corner <9...9,s '\ ti::t) 0'" Lot 9- .~ ~ _ ~ L ~ 'v' \ ~ (> \ .....cS>~ - S~ line of .Block :.;;; - - ~~ fence X---- X 89~.2 -' X ~ "onlJ"enteu th Ave. as '30'19' of Ply"OlJ . I'Y 78 t1:: 6- N'ly lIne [r::: 8 r · R::77:J.17 36.6 ~ ~t099.9 'i '0 \~ " , "1 <:s:) ...0 U\ ~ ")C.. I I _I 28.8 --,soD--- _ - --- <:& ~ ~ Ave. + --=::::=:= \ 1- Area .= .IE: 475. 7 Sq: Ft. --- . .lJeDotes found frooO LDO.DumeoOt o .De..Dotes set..irr:J.D JDOJ:Jume..Dt xtJtJD.tJ .lJeDotes erbt.l.1w e./ev: --- -- ulP plydlO .==-~ ----- w . .Denotes deciduollS tree ----- .oenotese Ti'ergreen tree -- ----- -- -- --- -- UClA.[, .o&5'CREPrION AI.I that part of 1:ois II and.l4 B.lock 4 Cl.lenWDod Yie1l; and tbat part of P./ymoutb Avenlle vacated, described IlS .1'000"9.: Commencing at the Nortbrest corner, of 1:ot.l.1, said Block 4' tbence SoutberJy along tlJe /YesterJy one of said 1:ot 1.1, a distance of 820 feet,. tlJence angle left 110 degrees, a distance of 1187.0 fe~t, to tlJe point of belinning of tlJe land to be described,' tbence sout.IJerJy pars.lle.l to tlJe westerJy .lie of said 1:ot.l.1, Il distance of .1;/0.25 feet. :more or .less, to tbe J.JortberJy lme of PlymoutlJ AveJ.Jlle, as no.". laid Ollt and opene4' tlJence nortlJeasterly along said nortlJerJy li.ne of P./ymOlltlJ Avenue, extended soutber./y; tbence nort.lJerJy 8/0.01 said eztended .line andtbe easterJy ..line of sllJa 1:ot ~ to a pamt on said ellsterJy.Ii.De, said pamt being a distance of .1011. 85 feet nortberly from tlJe soutbeast corner of sa.id 1:ot~. tbence nortlJerJy from tlJe soutiJeast corner. of SIlJa 1:ot~. tbence nort.lJwester.(y; a distance of .1.10. 0 feet. more or .Ies.s; to t.lJe paint of beginning. N DBJIARS-GABRlBL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. Pqmoutll. JIN tHU47 PhoDe:('1tJ3) 659-0908 Faz :(763) 659-0479 1 hereby certif;y tIlat tbis survey plaD or report 1r8S prepared by me or under my direct supervUdoD aDd tIlat 1 am a du.(y Reptered Land Surve;yor UDder tile Ian of tile State of .Jlbmesota. As surveyed by me tbls 6t1l d8)' 01 118)', 2003. File No. 18100 (B) LD.Q{.~ Boolc-P86e 413-42 Da'Vld B. Crook Jlbm. ReI. No. 88414 Scale 1-=80' . . . ! ,~ . 1336 Quebec Ave. N. 03-05-15 . Gary Goetz . See Large Size Plans and/or Survey in Planning Department . . . Hey Planning 763.593.80951 763.593-8109 (fax) Date: May 19, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 1336 Quebec Ave. N. (03-05-15) Gary Goetz, Applicant Gary Goetz owns the house and property at 1336 Quebec Ave. N. (southeast corner of Quebec Ave. N. and Knoll St.). The applicant came to the Inspection Department to apply for a building permit. In this case, it was obvious that the existing house and proposed mudroom/garage addition would not meet the front setback requirement of 35 ft. found in Section 11.21 of the Zoning Code. A survey was required to determine the exact location of the home on the lot and the location of the proposed mudroom/garage addition. The survey indicates that the side setback on the east is met by the existing house and proposed addition. The rear setback (south) is also met by the proposed addition. It should be noted that the existing shed on the lot would have to be removed in order to make room for the addition. This home is one of a few in Golden Valley that does not have a garage. The following are the requested v~riances: · The first variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the setback from streets (front or side) shall be 35 ft. The requested variance is 19.7 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 15.3 ft. at its closest point to the front (west) yard property line along Quebec Ave. for the existing house. · The second variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the setback from streets (front or side) shall be 35 ft. The requested variance is 17 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 18 ft. at its closest point to the front (west) yard property line along Quebec Ave. for the proposed mudroom/garage addition. The City's file indicates that the house was built 1941. The file indicates that there was a 20 ft. by 20 ft. garage constructed along with the house. 'CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: Gary Goetz 1336 Quebec Ave. N Golden Valley, MN Legal Description: Lot 5, Block 9, WINNETKA. rt /(#0/:/. STReET x 1/1,59 '/If, /p . (WI. 0C- t . +l Q) Q) 4-1 I' M N N 0'1 II I:: 0 or-! +l Itl > Q) ...... ZQ) ''0 Q) Q) >+l <m ::I Oor"'l Q)'O ..Q1tl Q) . ::10'1 ON 0'1 .... .... 0 -=r .. ....0 . C!b> . C1)C,!) ~ . E-4Z .. ,.!( J.I Itl e <"1/8,'12- ..c:: 0 1::' Q) ~ ~ "l -6tl,dtJ .!tlf'.5' 7' 4tJ" ,Z----,=- I I I ,iii ,iii 1M I I _ _ _'X<12Q,'f 1$",3 0 21... S Np, 15~t:. 1.- 51y ~ fTtNCO J./PtlSC ~,5 , ' . , (f,/~oH/np#S , VI , . ,'" M I : /klVe.iV41 , xfzo.t. (, ...- I NP, 7~2~ ONe: $TDJIly P;rIA/JIt; Ii~JSE.. ~~\ sb\ Y\j ('" "" '0 ' ()' ~ tJ !f~ _ , ' . . . ' ,': .. ~"", ,:',:) , 5dJi",II'I#IIs'" 1/"",,, '_ '.0 . ... '., ",DR~.t/,~W-4'( , ( T/M~&f( OECK ID r!IfEP joo xQ20 .. "l ~ -'~-- ~ ~ ~ / _,{ /1 ~ I ...., .._ ~ !._.V I ~ ~ ......... I <s l' I ~ I~ t ~ ~ " ........ \ I 6 II ~O I ~R~L!ZOo SQ>Ff,l 1 Scal.e: 1" = 30' o penotes iron monument XOQO.O = ExistLng elevation Bearings, are assumed ...C\ ,~ \ri ;c" le,''1 I 1/b',?~_ 9/8. f'1 6o.()o _11/110;7 ''t'D''W L-'" / ", ,- ( L__ l.../ I , I / I ("; -r 1-"'\ 1_- .. L" I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation ofa survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, encroachments, if any, from or on said land. I " As' surveyed by me this 14th day of April, 2003. and all visible . T(/~ It ,Ln, , Herb F'." Lemire % Minnesota Reg. NO. 13349 4416'Abbott Ave.N Robbinsdale, MN 55422 Phone: 763.537-0497 . CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: Gary Goetz 1336 Quebec Ave. N Golden Valley, MN . I . i (I) 4-l I"'- M N N 0'1 " l:: o .,-i +J It! :> (I) .r-f :2;(1) . ''0 (1)(1) :>+J <rn ~ 0-.. (1)'0 ..Q1t! (I) ~O'I ON 0'1 .... .... o "'" -. .....0 , . (9):>- . Cl)t!) IXI . E-lZ .. ~ ,.... It! e ..c:: o l:: ' ' (I) IXI . '/If, I ~ Legal Description: Lot 5, Block 9, WINNETKA. t k,A/O!:.L STReET ]( 'ffl.JCl 9/'/.0(. -6at1tJ J,ff'S 7/40" '1/B.7'2.. I I , I , III ,iii 1M I I - - - - I~9Z().'f 1::P:..'!>. _ 15",3 2L.S 1!l.2.. Alp.IH~ i-Sly fjt/(co p! I/PI#st i t I II fS I~ ,~ j I 10 ~ ~ '" ~"' l l' I I 6 9/9. f'f ! I 60,1)0 - fl/ISOf7 ''fD'''''1 I 1 1 /' I I 'I _/L -; 2.0 I '; -;- , t.-. l...,... t L_ L. 0. hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation f a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of he location of all bUildings, if any, thereon, and allvisi~le ' . nc;roachments, if any, from or on said land o.'f U IJ, L s'surveyed by me this 14th day of April, 2003. ~ ~ Herb F~ Lemire~ Minnesota Reg. NO. 13349 4416 Abbott Ave. N RObbinsdale, MN 55422 Phone: 763.537-0497 .!€:~ - ',~ ~ rtc. '/ Lor) I A 1l!!A:: 1'4 ZtJo .sQ. Ft. l;:) "I I . . , ~/uh?/nu#s I VI , . lr. 1M I : J';JRIVCiV47 I X'1a;,.t. ,,~ ". '" I\j Alp, '7>2~ ONe 5Tt.)I(l y F'/Z!/I:J/I;. J!"d Sc. , 7//I/fIiJEI( OEt::1< PfOpOs:J '0 . \I' ~ '(J '\'. f Ct' ~ /It__ ~' ~ ~ ~ /.0.1 4 ~ ~ ........ I '1j.~ , I Scale: 1" = 30' o penotes iron monument xooo.o = Existing elevation Bearings are assumed I ~~- ",.r.'''U~- c':'C\, u F (;::,.c Lo.) :1-.. ' , ~ ~':z:C.~...-;,.(-.. Mi'pJ'lL.S 2.oN ,.....(.... c.... J) 12 t.J A ~..I'W\J C 5 -- .u____ n_ --",'. _m""". __._ ____.m_._ ...~.. _"'_ ..~'S __~_:_..J.~.'_'\. 2. c..'O::S . - ~,,-- .~..--.- -..--------....-.--- ---- __...__u__.__ _____.___._,._.,__._.__._.._._..~_.,,____.__+____._.___,_...._____.'.___.______.__".._. .___.____n_._.._._.._ '" __...._. ,_,__, . .:t::"_-P,-\r.z.,.<:'H'-\5~J__n:~__.e(~~.~~"~_m~"!".m.j33f. . . <::_,",,,&i:3 \'1(' . .J5Y.L..N~~a:r}1_.__~_'1~S__m!:\~;0._. .. -TJt~_._.tt~",:~_~__J;:t:~5m,,'~_oid.-:f!y1._.__J.~Q_ -_~..f.:~~':\f3., . . n_.__k~!'__~~_.~__. L lJ~..:...'I~m_.,J:~m{'t2. !m~!~_.._.1:!'~'_M~~l~.6. ..11 'i. .__._m~2g,~.C;-:':. ----~---...~~~~:~:.~~-A.---~.._~~g___(_~... G.-'hi{'iVt.'v"". '._ _.._.____...........__..._.n _..__.._._ -- .-._- --.----.--.-.--- --.-.--.-.,.-.-----.. _h___ --.--..-.-....--__.,_ ..__________.._,.__;._+.__.______~"_._____.__.____k_..__.___~._._____~_______..___.___....__..____,_--_._.-.---- n_.____.____. _ 3,,"'::: Do",,"i C", s~ :J:. "'-'I. L \"... S4i.:r """'P",,,....u<""\ .~~_.--~-='~~~~.-..._~.=.___~.~_..__~_~1~.~_~.~~'::"\_~~"':?{.-t1"\~i t~.. ... \ s.__~."'_c,. . ..~.E_._ P ~~.....!y-'I.c::'.':~_..~_._S:>&~<\~_}. .._ c- 'L. ~....... .t"& (.. -\ (r~ (aN l>",~"~G~ . --.----.-..---------~.--- .-.---.---.-----.---.---------.-.--------...____ .~.~-t. ...f2 (i ~.. t:ft:- un__. .-........n.n-___.._~_n_n~___C n------n-.)j7n'fLl~ . _.~.-.._..-..... ..-- ..-....-----.-..------..-.....~.---.-.-.-.---.-......-.-.----.--...-...-..-....-.----..__..___JJ:,:J_<..S.4..Ci ..,_.~1. 'JS.._ . _..-.--.- --..-.. ._- .._--_._._--_._~---_._._.._~.._._-.- _._-.__.._..._-_..~.._-_._----_._-~._._-------_._----..-._----_.--_.....-.._-_......_...-.-~-_._-~._--.--~..... -. --.. .-..-.. ...---...----.-.---... _.._...----~....- ...---.---'. -_....._..~._---_.. _....._._---._-.__.._--_._--.~----_._._------._._-------~._....._--_.__.~._--~._._-----_..__._-~--_.....-.._..._.-.--------.-----......---....-.... _.__..n..______ .. .------- -.~.-..-..---.-.--~.-..-.---..- ___.._._._.____......,___...__._._._.__..____._..~~________.____.~_~________-:-._..._______._____.~____....._.......__ .__'___0._ .._ _ . . .. . .. , City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application No. Date Received . . BZA MeetingDate$'~e'".~ Amount Received :So 1. Street address of property involved in this application: J33& Q\.;\~8S(' .Av~v\e. "'ce.:\\-\ 2. Applicant:' bAR.'i E. C... OE:~Ti Name 133b Q ~i'3 G' <.:. A ,);10: #.J M..iZ- UU ~ "i\-\ Address ~;Il(O!!."-l v ALL>,., O'V\o'-l 5'5427 City/State/Zip Business Phone 763.544.27,5 Home Phone b/2 .3C'j(. .32( 7 Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: ~\A Print Name of owner Signature of owner 4. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. ~ .[ /J~' Signat re of Applican Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: ./ Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. ...../ A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on suryey requirements. ./ A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. -.::::'/ You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. Variance application fee, as follows: $50 - single family residential; $150 - other " Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: s part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all rrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be receiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. .,oomments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other WJatements regarding the project. Print Name .$ f P-. f- c> f:-J A. "( i' 0 /'J Comment Signature ,. J ~6,j\e-(.-1;1 vr> cL7f'b7/f.-- &-:: ! ft1;)Lc ~')J\ y / Address A 1'1 ;;c? C<.J t-t (..: l~ . c. .t!fv,/ /l-I.:::, - .e Comment ...<-;~ - - ./" / , >:1"r/~? .--;'?'./ / -' f /~.~~ (-' C." .,-" ...r"O- ,.--::::-/ .- 1337Qv~J~) . c- E: ./ /' / // ,,~" Print Name ,r--. ( 1.Dr':5hV)~j l1 LJ~ Comment Signatum C~6- ~. Address-=r(X<6i~~ /ll,llvltJ.\ Ct '\r) , )", " PlIa - .Ie 0JU,J2;NZ::;l( I-I~YDH Comment ~ eo< ~~4J1 UIl',clo-< Print Name ~I I He-Lidd ,JI]I. d300 ?lJf:jS€:C A..~/i.. Comment Signatum /~L~~ Address ~ca70 Print Name =r A.... So ~ W '(. &- Comment Signature Address /S"L6 P\."(~ +c,.J. Print Name Comment Signature Address