Loading...
07-22-03 BZA Agenda e e e Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - June 24, 2003 II. The Petitions are: 6005 Duluth Lane (03-07-29) Wally & Sue Langfellow, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . 8 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 7 ft. at its closest point to the west side property line for a deck and screened porch addition. . Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed deck and 3-season porch addition. 6610 Glenwood Avenue (03-07-30) Erika & Scott Charlesworth-Seiler, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . 7.4 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 7.6 ft. at its closest point to the east side property line for the construction of a garage and mudroom addition. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed new garage and mudroom addition. 30 Jersey Avenue South (03-07-31) James Bunin & Marcia Kohn-Bunin, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setbacks . 6 ft. off the required 27 ft. to a distance of 21 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the existing deck. . 6 ft. off the required 27 ft. to a distance of 21 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed new deck addition. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new deck addition attached to the existing deck. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . . .4 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 14.6 ft. at its closest point to the south side property line for the house and deck. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements. 6585 N. Cortlawn Circle (03-07-32) Marc Nanne, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 4 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 31 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line for the existing home along North Cortlawn Circle. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new front porch addition. 6510 S. Cortlawn Circle (03-07-33) Joan Thompson & Drew Hamre, Applicants e Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . 0.1 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 14.9 ft. at its closest point to the northwest side yard property line for a deck replacement. Purpose: To allow for the reconstruction of an existing deck to built in the same location. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 2 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 33 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line for a deck replacement. . 0.06 ft. off the required 35 t. to a distance of 34.94 ft. at its closest point to N. Cortlawn Circle for the existing house. Purpose: To allow for the reconstruction of an existing deck to built in the same location. e 2 401 Sunnyridge Lane (03-07-34) Lvnne Gaardsmoe. Applicant . Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12(A) Accessory Buildings . 3.90 ft. off the required 5 ft. to a distance of 1.1 ft. at its closest point to the south side yard property line for a proposed garage addition. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a second garage stall on an existing single stall garage. 1121 Angelo Drive (03-07-35) Cheryl Scruton, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . 6 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point to the north side yard property line for a proposed room addition. . 6 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing home. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd, 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks e . 5 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 30 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Angelo Drive for the existing home. 335 Burntside Drive (03-07-36) Jon Brusven, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . 1.1 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 13.9 ft. at its closest point to the south side property line for the existing garage. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements to allow for the replacement of an existing deck. 7810 Ewald Terrace (03-07-37) Audrev Zibelman & Jan LeSuer. Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks e . 2.4 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 16.6 ft. at its closest point to the east side property line for the existing house. 3 e e e Purpose: To allow for the construction of a conforming family room addition. 3325 Kyle Avenue North (03-07-38) Pat & Dave Nesbitt. Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 0.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 34.1 ft. at its closest point to the front property line for the existing house. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a conforming expanded breezeway. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7C Side Yard Setbacks . 1.1 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 13.9 at its closest point to the front property line for the existing house. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment 4 , . " . . . Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Monday, June 24,2003, in the Council Chambers 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Sell called the meeting to order at 7:15 pm. Those present were Chair Sell, Members Cera, McCracken-Hunt, Smith and Planning Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were . Official Gary Johnson and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittm arrived at 7:30 pm. I. Approval of Minutes - May 27,2003 MOVED by Smith, seconded by Shaffer and moti approve the May 27,2003 minutes as submitted. II. The Petitions are: 5120 Minnaqua Drive (03-06-1 Neil Larsen & Susan Fridle Request: ubd. 7(e) Side Yard Setbacks 14.25 ft. to a distance of 8.18 ft. at its side yard property line for the existing uired 14.25 ft. to a distance of 8.74 ft. at its the west side yard property line for the existing ft. off of the required 14.25 ft. to a distance of 10 ft. at its est point to the east side yard property line for the proposed addition Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a proposed 3-season porch and deck addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks · 7.79 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 27.03 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Minnaqua Drive for the existing home and attached garage. . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 2 Purpose: To bring the existing garage into conformance with building setback requirements. Johnson reviewed the applicant's proposal for a three season porch and deck addition. Sell stated that the lot presents problems because of its trapezoidal shape. He asked the applicant if he had anything to add to his request. Larsen stated that there really is no where else on the lot to put this addition. He the . ssed the flood berm located on his property. He said that the neighbor at aqua Drive was granted a similar variance in the past and that the r about keeping their kids away from the nearby water. . 7.79 ft. off tQ~H front yard pr~ attach ft. at its closest point to Shaffer said that he thinks this is the proper use of a va that the applicant is following the same setbacks of the MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by McCracke unanimously to approve the following varian . . 6.07 ft. off the required 14.25 ft. to the east side yard property line ~ . 5.51 ft. off the required 14. the west side yard propert ce of 8.74 ft. at its closest pointto ting home. . 4.25 ft. off of the req the east side yard pro o a distance of 10ft. at its closest point to e for e proposed addition o a distance of 27.03 ft. at its closest point to the Minnaqua Drive for the existing home and ,urg Avenue North (03-06-19) Carol Leer A licants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks .9.11 ft. off the required 12.51 ft. to a distance of 3.4 ft. at its closest point to the south side property line for the proposed garage addition. . Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed garage addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks ", . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 3 .16 ft. off required 35 ft. to a distance of 19 ft. at its closest pointto the front property line for the garage addition along Gettysburg Ave. N. Johnson explained that the applicantis proposing to construct an attached garage which would require the two variances listed above. McCracken-Hunt asked if staff had talked to the applicant about putting the proposed garage in other locations on the site. Johnson stated th had talk to the applicant about moving the proposed garage to the rear or making it smaller. Mr. Leer said that their goal is to move the p the dining room window so that it willi since day one. He said the home w original survey showed a propos built. He said that there has n they have lived in this home. to build a garage on this it just wouldn't be usa e to Leer, It would be uch retaining Sell asked the applicant why they are proposing to build Gettysburg rather than keeping it even with the front of applicant, stated thatthere is a severe slope on th~ pro almost impossible, cosmetically, to make it look g ,Wii", wall would have to built to make the driveway; . age a foot forward from been a garage there lot in 1969 and that the ,~ame location but it was never e on' the property in the 18 years have looked at every way possible that if they build the garage any other way at the home is a walk-out so if the garage were to same level as the basement floor. Sell ent in the garage as well. Mr. Leer stated that enter into the house. Mrs. Leer said the windows on ost and that she couldn't imagine how the roof lines ee ted it was his hope to match the existing dormers, attach ~]V. ouse and not have to lose any windows. ~$:' it was correct that the applicants had already worked with the City e size of the garage. Mr. Leer stated that was correct. . McCracken-Hunt asked the applicant's if they understood the concerns the City has with the front yard setback and that all of the houses along Gettysburg are setback at relatively the same distance and that this would protrude out into that front yard area. Mr. Leer said he understood that and referred to the photos he submitted and said that it wouldn't be an eyesore or stick way out. Shaffer stated that conceivably putting the garage in the back yard could be done. Mr. Leer stated that he has thought about putting the garage in back and ., . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 4 that they have had engineers and contractors look at putting a garage in the back but there wouldn't be enough room to turn around and they would still have to deal with the slope to the street and that part of the problem is that the lot isn't a rectangle. Shaffer stated that the City tries to maintain the front yard setback and that and that in this particular neighborhood every house is right along the 35-foot setback. He said that he can't allow the garage to go into the front yard this far. Mr. Leer stated that there is only one neighbor on the block that h arage. Shaffer said that he looked at this property and he imagined wh osed garage would be and that he couldn't vote for this proposal. asn't a problem to him if the garage is in front of the house or n connect, it is more of a problem of where the house is i garage and that the garage would end up being too far McCracken-Hunt stated that she couldn't think of variances for garages this far into a front set examples of properties where the Board ha setbacks. v ving granted ted he could show to built into front Smith stated that he feels differentl hardship with the lot, the water He said the Board has tended particularly because it enhan the applicants have coo garage. He said that h front setback looks an said it makes a 10 n and that there is a the fact there is no garage. garage building in Golden Valley u adds to the value and the fact that e City already in reducing the size of the having a couple of cars sticking out into the an ing a little bit of garage sticking out. He he would vote for it. " se as an example and said that there would be no garage on his 50-foot wide lot without using his at if he were to vote for this proposal it would mean ure he could put a garage on the front of his house, his neighbor could too and then there would be 19-foot front ughout the City and that is not what the Board is trying to do. Mr. Leer ed that in order to move the proposed garage addition to any other location it would hurt the character of the home. He said that he has worked on this house for 18 years and that he doesn't want to finish it if it will hurt the character of the home. He added that if he thought if it were going to be an eyesore in anyway he wouldn't do it. McCracken-Hunt said that she doesn't have a problem with the side yard setback to the south even though it is closer than she likes to see but, in order to get a garage it would be ok, but she does have a problem with the front yard . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 5 setback and she wishes the proposed the garage could be shifted back further, to be more in line with the house, maybe slightly protruding into the front yard setback but not the 20 feet being proposed. She said she understands the applicants concerns about the windows being covered up, but many times garages being added to sides of houses result in covering upone side of windows. She said that she also felt when she looked at the property that she would like to see some other options and that she is uncomfortable with the precedent of allowing a garage to project out into the front yard to such an extent. Mrs. Leer stated that this is a very unique block of homes an always wondered why the homes were placed on the lots t She discussed some of the other homes near theirs an on the lots. Sell explained that the reason the homes were pi Gettysburg was to get as much good soil as away from the swampy land in the back. s ey were to to keep them Cera stated that he agreed that the pr front yard setback. Mr. Leer stated t past that are further into the fron McCracken-Hunt said that sh which are considered to hav front yard to be a side y oing too far into the ranted variances in the n what he is requesting. f some situations that are corner lots and the Board has considered one d a variance based on that. MOVED by Smith to a lack of a second. ce appeals as requested. Motion died for by McCracken-Hunt and motion carried 3 to 2 to s as requested. t: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7{A) Front Yard Setbacks · 15 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20 ft. at its closest point to the south (front) property line for the existing home along Knoll Street. · 15ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20 ft. at its closest point to the south (front) property line for the existing garage along Knoll Street. . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 6 · 13ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 22 ft. at its closest point to the south side property line for the proposed addition along Knoll Street. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a proposed addition to the rear of the home. Johnson noted that the variance request listed above for the existi should be changed to 16.4 feet off of the required 35 feet to a d' . feet at its closest point to the south (front) property line for th e along Knoll Street. The reason the request needed to be c dimension on the survey was given from the house to th should have been given from the chimney to the prope . the Jasper, applicant, stated that his neighbor across be the contractor for this project, did a similar 11"; McCracken-Hunt stated that everything alig n yard rather than a front yard. h also going to ne in the past. feels like a side . Shaffer stated that the proposed n existing house and that the only the applicants own backyard. k a little further than the sacrificed in this situation is MOVED by McCracken- to approve the followin . 16.4 ft. off the south (fron r d by Cera and motion carried unanimously r'Wi.~sts: . to a distance of 18.6 ft. at its closest point to the he existing home along Knoll Street. 5 ft. to a distance of 20 ft. at its closest point to the ine for the existing garage along Knoll Street. uired 35 ft. to a distance of 22 ft. at its closest point to the operty line for the proposed addition along Knoll Street. 6250 Wayzata Boulevard (03-06-21) Junior League of Minneapolis, Applicant Dione De Martelaere, Architect Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(A) Yard Requirements . . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 7 . 1 9.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 15.1 ft. at its closest point to the front (south) property line for the existing building alongWayzata Boulevard. Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd, 6(C)(3)&(4) Yard Requirements .0.8 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 19.2 ft. at its closest point to the west side property line for the existing building. . 10ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 10ft. point to the east side property line for the exis . . 10ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance to the east side property line for the exi . 8 ft. off the required 10ft. to a dist to the east property line for th t closest point arking lot. . 4 ft. off the required 10ft to to the west property Ii f 6 ft. at its closest point arking lot. Purpose: To bring the exis . setback requir proposed ne driveway' nformance with the building allow for the construction of the ot a to bring the existing parking lot and ance with the yard requirements. Shaffer noted that ther above listed requ spaces are s be on more variance request added to the ed to the site plan and stated that the parking t by 19 feet, not the required 9 feet by 20 feet. Jr. League, applicant, stated that this Golden Valley ers and that they need to expand the parking lot. She parking has not been an issue but they have various e month which require more parking. elaere, architect for the project explained that the parking spaces d to 9 feet by 19 feet to make the aisles 24 feet wide. Shaffer stated that this proposal is a perfect example of why the City has zoning variances because the applicant is trying to make something right, trying to make the appropriate amount of parking, they are dealing with the drainage appropriately and it is not impacting anybody, it is trying to make something work that doesn't right now. . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 8 MOVED by Smith, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously tb approve the following variances which includes adding one regarding reducing the size of the parking spaces: . 19.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 15.1 ft. at its closest pointto the front (south) property line for the existing building along Wayzata Boulevard. . 0.8 ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 19.2 ft. at its closest point to the west side property line for the existing building. . 10ft. off the required 20 ft. to a distance of 10ft. at its clo side property line for the existing building. east . 10ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of 0 ft. at it side property line for the existing driveway. . 8 ft. off the required 10ft. to a distance of property line for the proposed new parkin . 4 ft. off the required 10ft. to a dist property line for the existing park osest point to the west . 1 ft. off the required 20 ft. parking stalls in the Ind pth to allow for 9 feet by 19 feet 1. (Section 11.30, Subd. 6(0)) ection 11.21, Subd. 7{A) Front Yard Setbacks the required 35 ft. to a distance of 33.8 ft. at its closest . t to the front yard property line for the existing home along hard Avenue North. . To bring the existing house into conformance with existing building setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7{C) Side Yard Setbacks . 11.1 ft. off the required 14.1 ft. to a distance of 3 ft. at its closest point to the north side property line for a garage addition. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed garage addition. . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 9 Johnson clarified that the staff report stated that the front yard setback variance request was for 1.2 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 33.9 ft. and that it should have read to a distance of 33.8 feet. Sell asked the applicants if they were planning to add the proposed second garage stall with wall between the two stalls and a door between them or how they intended to add the second stall. Thomas Grant, applicant stated yes, they intended to add a second stall with a door between and that the existing garage wall will stay. Thomas Grant said that he change his plans to mak the side property line allow the garage to co said he would agr feet deep so that it o c garage to be 22 ng that the garage just racken-Hunt explained ont of the garage for Sell asked the applicant why the proposed garage is 14 feet Grant, applicant stated that originally they had proposed a but that that would have caused it be too close to the pr that adding 14 feet to the existing garage is a lot of gar variances. Dorothy Grant stated that it really doesn't fee usable space because of the wall in the middle. . Shaffer explained that the Board typically co feet by 22 feet. Dorothy asked if the Board be for parking and not for storage or that there would still be approximat storage. ause he was originally asked to d garage come no closer than three feet to rd is asking him to redraw the plans to ser n five feet to the side property line. He the proposed garage to be 12-feet wide by 24- feet away from the side property line. nded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to iance requests: . uired 35 ft. to a distance of 33.8 ft. at its closest point to the rty line for the existing home along Orchard Avenue North. . 9.1 ft. e required 14.1 ft. to a distance of 5 ft. at its closest point to the north side property line for a garage addition. 7225 Country Club Drive (03-06-23) Bradlev W. Doolittle, Applicant . Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 10 . 7.3 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 7.7 ft. at its closest point to the west side property line for a deck and screened porch addition. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed deck and screened porch addition. Shaffer stated that it is not clear where the deck area is compared to the screened porch area. Doolittle referred to the survey and clarified ails of the proposed addition. Shaffer stated that this didn't bother him e neighboring house is so far away and it is going to be difficul he addition is even there. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded b approve the request for 7.3 ft. closest point to the west side addition. seems to inflict the th t and how the lot t she thinks it is also the Sell asked the applicant how long he has lived in this h lived there since 1985. Shaffer said that putting the addition in this p least amount of damage in terms of where it and neighborhood is set up. McCracken-Hu appropriate location for the proposed . ,Jtl carried unanimously to 15 ft. to a distance of7.7 ft. at its a deck and screened porch om Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks ft. 0 the required 15 ft. to a distance of 12 ft. at its closest point e south side property line for the existing garage. 4 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 11 ft. at its closest point to the south side property line for the proposed garage addition. Purpose: To bring the existing garage into conformance with building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a proposed garage addition. . Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 11 . 2 .19 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 32.81 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line for the existing home along Vale Crest Road. .2 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 33 ft. at its closest point to Vale Crest Road for a proposed garage addition. McCracken-Hunt asked what the front yard. Pirzinski expla entry area for the laund even with the front of t of "l" shaped. . 7 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 28 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along Vale Crest Ro 1I0w for a proposed bathroom addition. Purpose: To bring the existing house into conforman setback requirements and to allow for th proposed garage and bathroom additio . Rick Pirzinski, T JB Remodeling and Design, reprefe that the homeowners would like to update th off the master into a bathroom that has at Ie bathtub in it. He said that there is an old has caused moisture problems and t help alleviate that because it would owner stated ge the half bath r or me kind of a nt of the house which of the garage should r extending the garage ten feet into nted to gain the mudroom and rear ey wanted to make the front of the garage house would be more "U" shaped instead ers had looked at other places to put the I ed that the problem is that it couldn't go off the 't enough room and that the other bedrooms are the e master. McCracken-Hunt stated that building off the qUi variance but it would a smaller variance request. !",~t another reason the homeowners didn't want to build to the se"is because they wanted to update the look of the front of the roof line. McCracken-Hunt stated that she doesn't have a problem with the garage addition and suggested that maybe one of the back bedrooms could be changed to become the master bedroom. . Pirzinski said that he didn't think the homeowners would do the bathroom addition at all if it had to be on the side of the home because it would be too hard to do architecturally. . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 12 McCracken-Hunt said that she would prefer the bathroom to be around to the side but that she is comfortable allowing the bathroom addition to line up with the existing home in the front. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Smith and motion carried unanimously approve the following the variance requests: . 2.19 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 32.81 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line for the existing home along Vale Cr ad. . 2.19 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 32.81 the front yard property line along Vale Crest Road to bathroom addition. (The Board's intent is to al line up with the existing home.) oint to oposed addition to . 2 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 33 ft. at its clos Crest Road for a proposed garage addition. . 5000 St. Croix Avenue North (0 David Swanson, Applicant Request: Waiver from S bd. 7(C) Side Yard Setbacks ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point line for a deck replacement. econstruction of an existing deck to built in the eck has been in the same location. Swanson, s been there for 23 years. all of the neighbors seemed to like the deck. MOV affer, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 6 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point to the east side property line for a deck replacement. 4645 Bassett Creek Lane (03-06-26) Joan Kneeskern, Applicant . Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 13 . 6.3 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 28.7 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Bassett Creek Lane for the existing home. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a conforming garage addition, breezeway addition and deck addition to the existing home. Request: . Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 9 Cornices and Eaves . To allow the eaves on the existing home to proje than the allowed 30 inches into the setback a Shaffer referred to the above variance request to allow home to project 6 inches into the setback area and stat word "existing" added before the word eaves. MOVED by Smith, seconded by Shaffer and approve the following variance requests: . 6.3 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a di front property line along Bassett its closest point to the e existing home. . To allow the existing eave the allowed 30 inches in home to project 6 inches more than m ection 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 17.09 ft. at its est point to the front property line for the existing house along naqua Drive. . To bring the existing home into conformance with building setback requirements. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Smith and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 17.91 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 17.09 ft. at its closest point to the front property line for the existing house along Minnaqua Drive. ." . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 24, 2003 Page 14 1817 Hillsboro Avenue North (03-06-28) Ward Blumer, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 11ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 24 ft. at its closest point to the front property line for the existing deck along Hillsboro Avenue North. III. Other Business Purpose: To bring the existing deck into conformance wit requirements. MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Shaffer and unanimously to approve the request for 11 ft. off the re of 24 ft. at its closest point to the front property lin for t Hilfsboro Avenue North. No other business was discussed. . IV. Adjournment . c'ot .. . 6005 Duluth Lane . Wally & Sue Langfellow 03-07 -29 . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 16, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 6005 Duluth Lane (03-07-29) Wally and Sue Langfellow, Applicants Wally and Sue Langfellowown the house at 6005 Duluth Lane (southwest corner of Duluth Lane and Adair Ave.). They are requesting a variance from one requirement of the Residential Zoning Code (Section 11.21). The applicant came to the Inspections Department proposing to construct a deck and three-season porch on the west side of their house. Because no current survey was available, a survey was required to determine the exact location of existing structures and proposed structures on the lot. The survey was done and itwas determined that the existing deck on the west side of the house (for which no building permit or variance was issued) was non- conforming and that the proposed three-season porch and deck were also non-conforming. The. project requires a variance from the following section of City code: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setback. City Code states that the side yard setback shall be 15% of lot width. I n this case of this property, the proposed side yard setback after the three-season porch and deck are added would be 7 ft. The variance requested is for 8 ft. oft the required 15 ft. at its closest point to the west side property line for the deck and screen porch addition. The proposed deck and three-season porch is proposed to be located where there is now an existing deck that is 14 ft. by 24 ft. This deck will be removed and the new construction would be placed in about the same location. The new construction area is somewhat smaller, only 14 ft. by 18 ft. As stated above, the existing deck did not receive either a building permit or variance for construction. The applicant has submitted plans and a statement regarding the proposed addition. The City's file on this property reveals that the house was built in 1962. The only addition to the house was the existing deck that was built without a building permit or variance. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY _______ FOR: Wally & Sue Langfellow 6005 Duluth Lane Golden Valley, MN ,/ _~ O<<L (j)7/_ I A A _(II.. e. L .. --- - kLi -il~73 l Legal DescnptlOn: Lot 4, Block 1, FIRST ADDITION OF BRUNSWICK COURT. a-I ---,..; .~ ..,.... , I I It) II\-) I I I I I ({.f2.' x ~ ..L- - Ii.:j. -- ':p,qItJE WOI/fE 11,.4- g_u,.I."'(u - - - - _. . " -'.~ ~ 1_.01.) ~ ~ , ~ ~ " , -\-- \ 's.I./~- - S g?o/~ ~ ;!.S~~ - -, ~n. 7~ I I I In, I'l) I Scale: 1" = 20' o Denotes iron monwnent xooO.o = Existing elevation Bearings are asswned %75- 7f "- \ Pt?JPO lED P~:;"g_. I IIJfj.{..7 Z/ Ib 1 ~ ~ '1fi7g', Z ~N 25 6,,, \ iflc;( I/,vIJ&R ~AR.I/C& . "'-= C"Alcr~ Ie:- $7S" /Y't:1, ~OO, PA'e ~-kR1 r.e/l"n,f; dpuSE DrlUcwa 51:---- 3'.,:>- . ~ 875',fJ)( '" " .2.1 CAli/TED '" 97'/,1.:!' "If /I;;;('r. C "'J' ;'-/~ './t'"fj?" /,." I I \J I' V _,J I.&""..- I '- J ! , -;,.. , /."""" . :i I ' { _~-.~~,-...>,-l/",1 I Lall . I 41?M;: /??~~8~ .>tf.C~ I I I~-::" 7-.3 ~\.~ - --.. --- -- - _.~- s f't:107 tJ/MI,y',4C~ / (/-I///1. E/I.5E/llC/J/f .. tls:"!t/ 1 _ /~5:'1? AJg'1()/~~25hkJ- ",.. " "7 t'- d- 8L/<. /.1 .rf CIfO/ X ~/i~ // L-- -~ I I. hereby cettify that this Is . true end correct representation of a survey of . the boundaries of the abcMtctescrlbed land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and aI' visible InCfOIChments, if any, from or on said land. "-)10,.(""'_ It ...... .7itIN! . 201l.L. ~~~4/ Benchmark: 1 ~ " In Q' \l\ ~ 0' ~ I ~ ~ " \ -It) i 2-E l( Y7'/. () Spike in PP @ 1880 Adair Ave. N N.G.V.D. 1929 adjusted elevation = 876.41 feet. Minn. Rea. No / -KJ I/C' v' ;/ . . . Vfq I \~t ~ s 14 e... L '" n qteA loev &00'5 D0IIC(~ LctW~ -;"Bo~h+ pY'op'Gl"'ty '\\1 19~3. HC\ve- love.-d IIV/f7j In ." Gf G ld~ VOi J fe-j ctnd uJ CU1t to re.rnq \ n 10 E-f-~ l I,; \-\(}US~ V'S on q c-or-n~ lot OM sloped propert'l '115.\n3\~ star-v 'In +he front - 0( storY-In +h~ bqc:.,!~ ili w.\~ W LAI k D V\ t bO\,s~e,l1t Cind t~0K L<A'\JeA- ~CU--O\je- Ilf LIYI n!}l r--ODWl vJ\+h I (A\^j~ p(~t(Ar0 w \~'\ do u) 0fl1d Z. /1, b~dro0 YV1S r-~1n CAGrt)::>5 the-.' bV\9k ot +h e-- ho lAS G r!ll-<I+cJ,~ IS in +he- ~\"ont o.nd din I ~jroo rYl w,~ ill plAttO door 1'5 at +he- 0\ d~ of +h~ hou~v. . -t14110re, IS Ot devk D-\=f of +he-- d\n\ V\:J ~on1()/h(ch 1113\Uts ~et-,/ l11tl<:,- lAse- be~G\C\se.. d's +00 hot ~J bC\j~ i' T! th I~ \~ +h~ D~l'f plCACe. on +h~ proper-tf fhV\t ~ s fl,l, COn d \.( C I \'"e.J to be< lid I~q '^ vY1 Cllh t' loor 3 - 'Seh\ "So 'l 1;, .p OKJh be Get use Df ~--60'f- Uf1 of -tht"_ hol.(s~, 4J. ~iJ.~ wou f d de VQ llAG + he... hous~C\n dpro pe.r-ty to II, bu,\d ~h~ fOY'vh !n ~h€-b~yk O(\\~ tC1k~ ~WfAY th~ ,H \ 0\V--3.e.. p(G!~r0 WlVldovJ VI~W +~C\t we..- ,enJoy< 1f4 IT,I+ IS C{ pr-1or\ty to hG\v~ +h~ rOOM D\dJC\c.E>nt U, to +h E:-. k 1 tvh €/V) w her t-- It CC1 Yl be lAsed 0<.5 0. h I\fove~~ low -f rOM +he... k, +C/h~ O\h d d I""; n5 OIl-eel. W ~ !Ild Oh t [J/ G\ h t ,C\ t r-CA ft (c.. pq-n-e~11 ClC\"-o 5sth e. wh (te- ,,:Cct~ p0ted l \ V I ~3 r-oo vYl to j~t to +h e. porCJh) !i,e5reG,l~lfy WI~ Cl jrOvvtd~Qns . " W 0 vJ I n 0 U y- Y' e t I r--~. rn e.A1 t w €.- w' q h tap 1, V( c e-l-o h VI ve '" l. I o L-{ y- VYlar-1') \ r13 Co ff e-.e. f , e nJ' 01 +Me- b re.e.--7e-s Ol n d no +- hOt v ~ to f ( j h t- () f f b Uj s, :- .: ,1)0 r I City of Golden Valley Board Qf Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application Application No. . Date Received. aZA Meeting Date Amount Received 1. Street address of property involved in this applicatiolr fp 00 S D' u 1 (A t h L Ct n e- APPlican;:' \N' ",/I Y <N-\J .S u e.. L A- Y\ j -9 e, [l 0 u) Name uOO,t b.dwl-~ LClA0 Gol~ \/v"lIet Mt-l .55q~.' Address I C ty/State/Zip 1&3- 5'-1fo~ ScJ7 f Home Phone ------ 2. Business Phone Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner Signature of owner To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. Variance Application Submittal: 'The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: / Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. L A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. ,/ A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds forthe granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. / You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration{s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. / Variance application fee, as follows: e single family residential; $150 - other .- Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Noteto the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property' owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. ' . If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of "y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ~ceiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. Print Name ~ () \\ ~\\C'?o. ~. ~\..""A~ Comment -L , I 1 c. ",k. I'IOc..f- l ro e + Address ~() ( ~ 'D "" \ '-\.*"'" \ "- ~o\~~'l ve..U~ t'*1(V S-~'i Y k&E{L.- Signature ~ Comment 6cIL ~&GfZ-lj7C) N\at#Aj~_*~ .nature Address de. S G-c.. AP At fZ- ~ ~q-~~ ,; Print Name ~rb G .'f?Z~ omment Signature /lJz: ft,-~ W 'Llr. ft{){J VlPlvtA- To Pu.., 6p e>vD-- f~ VM-Vi-S (dii"ec.tl1 Clc.,~O$ ~e,. S+r~e,t) ~ . &. ~u7rt.;. LAtV~ ~O~ ~ Address 6cJlA{)l.J.../ vMt-lC1 /t1,.J Print Name (h'1JJI6 LOV)j Comment ~ . /~ CU ~ CU~h k Me) ~ ( <\ tn. Hi ~j p'lb ~ty; b eSt ~"J) '51'S~D oltiJerr'i L~. Address .Oro kf~V\ VCf/1ei Signature -PWF ~o- Akly /l)~Jb> 5 ' GrPD~ o~~ ~t5 j\ : Signature CJdi~J0 c.J ~~1 Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Print Name Comment ignature .' J)tlJlG#r I- UiLL S '4Jdt h/d/JUex-d/d Jx:2Ldd;/(H/-t~*/ /. (~b<-\t~ PYO~"+~ek\n~) Address W;oJ Wt)g~\f~ In, . lhre.-e- 3E'45D tl Por~ . . \J a 11y Ou\J Swe... L Yth~ t~( I 0 LV Co 00,5" D"dL{~ LQnt-- Grold~ V~ IJ~I Mf\lSS4J.~ . . . . . . . . ~tree,t from propose-d / , J . L;- , , I I i , , i i ! . ! Bedroom Bedroom , I ! i Ii i , ! ! , i , I I ! If i Batt1room Bedroom I , I! i' , , i i i II : , <Xl , co , >j ---- -- -.-- _.--- '._.-..- ---- -. , Entrance (Cermic Tile) i i ~------ ~_._.._- i I , i i i I', ol i i I I , ! i I , I I , I T I I I ! i I ! I ! I I , i I i I " ; I , I I I '. i I I I " F= , -- Kitchen (Ceramic Tile) I ~-1 I I ! II L I , n Living Room ( Carpet) 1 -- ~ -- -- --- ----F -- --- ---. U , , I! i I , I I I ! E 11 II /" -< I! ~ I /r1 r, i ! 1\1\ / I I ~ I 1\ I I II Existing ! 'I jj 1:::..==1 y- , , " -r~--l' I Dining Room , i , I_.j' i i i 6068 , i i : . -- , I /~- I -- .-- -- , , I! =i , , 4040 ";j --.". .__. L_ -.--- _.,_h_ ---- ......_.u .-. .+. - -~- -----. ---- -~..- _..__n -.-.- ------ ----- ---.. .-.-... ~._- I r- t --,_'. "-_=,-~ .__ 1------ i '" -.-...... ---.- / / / I i ,..---// ..,,-- Project: Three Season P I I ! - i , I Wally and Sue Lang ! I i ! I i 6005' Duluth Ln. N. l:jl GROUND DECK I (no railings) ! i Golden Valley, .... Three Season Mn. ~ 5'-7" x 13'-8~ I I Porch i , ~ , i ! 11 '-0" x 13'-4" ! ~ i .... ~ ! I i I , I I 1 , , i i I i I I \ ! Contractor: i ! ! l ] i I T omco Company In , I i 1425 Andover Blvd. ! I I --.,.- ___~L_ L ~ ! L6.~,-J, -_.-. .----. --" ---. -- Andover, Mn. 5530 12'-0" z Ph: 612-791-4368 g '" -,,---r l:jl fD ~ ~ orch fellow W. 55422 . c. N.W. 4 LIVING AREA 1166sqft -. ~ 'I' "", ~ ~.. '" ".t.. 4. ....1\ -'. , " L ~ , . . . 6610 Glenwood Ave. Erika & Scott Charlesworth-Seiler 03-07 -30 . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 16, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 6610 Glenwood Ave. (03-07-30) Erika and Scott Charlesworth-Seiler, Applicant Erika and Scott Charlesworth-Seiler own the house at 6610 Glenwood Ave. The house is on the north side of Glenwood Ave. near the intersection with Hampshire Ave. N. They are requesting a variance from Section 11.21 of the Zoning Code in order to allow their existing garage to be expanded to the east"and north. In 1978, this property was granted a variance to allow the expansion of the garage to 22 ft. wide and 20 ft. deep. The variance permitted the attached garage to come within 11.6 ft. of the side property line rather than the required 15 ft. The plan now is to expand the garage width to 26 ft. and the depth to 30 ft. The expansion would bring the garage to within 7.6 ft. of the side property line instead of the required 15 ft. The applicant states that the expansion will also incorporate a mudroom adjacent to the existing kitchen. The project requires a variance from the following section of the City Code: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setback. City Code states that the side yard setback for attached garages shall be 15% of the lot width. In this case, the side yard setback has been determined to be 15 ft. The variance requested is for 7.4 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 7.6 ft. at its closest point to the east side property line for the construction of a garage and mudroom addition. In viewing the site, there does not appear to be enough space between the existing garage and the fence (east property line) to allow for a 7.6 ft. setback after the new construction is completed. This could be because the fence is not on the property line. It is the responsibility of the applicant to show the Inspections Department the property line in order to determine that the building can be built as specified by the variance. The City's file on this property reveals that the house was built in 1948. The garage was expanded with a variance in 1978. A three-season porch was added to the west side of the house in 1985 as shown on the survey. Daniel . OF PROPERTY OF ~t8~_ K. 0 \ \3 rie-l"\... LOCATION {;,("IO G\enwoo& A\Je.) Go\clel'\ \I.;ll~ey 'I ~n OESCRIBEOASFOLLOWS Th;l\: pad of Lot q '-yil'\q ~ou.-I::h of" P>--uclitor's SUbdiv\s\c"", No. ~'-"'Z- ~ ot .J 4-1. '- ~~ ! I "I'( 0 ~ov " ~ P> J (\J ., I z....($ r" I ~ I '0 ./ i I "-.. ........... \ ..........\ '" "7 '. ROY J. HANSEN Land Surveyor AND Civil Eneineer , ... I I I . PLAT OF SURVEY 13907 Sprinc lake RNd Hopkins, Minn. 55343 Telephone 938-5678 ~\;e nOMn 4~L feet -tl.ereof, r ,} I I --:r - -.--- ~-I ~ I . , . ; ,J ~~ : (,--. , ' : .... ~ t \11.\ .,. , \ I I I ,- -- . . -, , \ I , .,.' J cr- r- I .... ...,' " 2'" ~ ~ -~ ~~ " \)C=::l'o'tc~.'S, tc-oV\. moV\u.me.V\t Sc..ate. ~ \. -= 40' o ~e. .........~ "}"'J I hereby certify that on (7 -<......L.... / 7 . 192L I surveyed the property described abb';e and that the above plat is a correct representation of said survey. "- "- '" CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY . CERTIFJC~TEOF LOCATION OF BUILDING I hereby certify that on_ ~19_ I made a survey of the local ion of the building(s) on the above described property and-.lhat the location of said building(s) is correctly shown on the above plat. ROY J. HANSEN, REGISTERED SURVEYOR ND'!:2~ j. ~c:! (.. -so ~ f < ~ ~ ~ C> ~ ~ ~ '1 ~ ~ ~ / I I I .. c-;c:::: ~I I : . I i ~ I ---"-'~--~-~~------"--""---"'-::-'==-~:=,=~=-==~.'-:"- :_::.: :.~ :~-'::~- --~=~:. ~=.', =~-~==--==--::-=--------: I' -f- i l --- - -- - ____U i I I ,I II If i I I ; I' I J .)1 : (tJI "- .x I ~ ~A -\ ' '-ll'~ 'I~ I I i I ::;'1 ~ - 1 ~ I j I I'i l~;' r' : i i i i!~11'5L Ii," . .,~,?? rl , , _"'1aV _,__~ g J . .-' c . '----,"-..., i I i <r. I ::'7;) ~. I "'1;..0 _'7'Jr; I /--~I . ' 'S.:.:t--- -..- - - ---,- S ~ ~=-:---------' I 1\ i I j' ~ i t cb I I I le+ II II I J I ' ! I + ( , H f!o/ ,. 'ft rV -:' '''' Ii ; ? i ~ 1;- ! ' i' I ~ - r~'--+--; !: -~'=-::r --=-:-;~' j i i i i ! ! i 1 ! ~-, ~il /~ #)~~~ t_-- I i >1 I I I i I I i I ~. ... 0-'9 ) " ' /I'~ .:;pO/S c".-.:p~' "l"'--1rF.:2"::> 1:'#-'7 "'?!-! ...; "'" 'f'::fl'" ~ r '1 .r'~ :tl. 'V /y NY /",''''1'; /,{~( 9 (7) ~<J & ~ F: b - 'ZIrS-s~t ..Pl.....> ~1?0S:;;/4tf!J i" 5' ;5:fl I?-.> 5 ""':J- . We are requesting this variance in order to be able to add a mud room to our kitchen space. Presently we don't have any space in our living area to utilize as as a mud room/entry way. The exterior door enters directly onto the landing of the stairs to the basement, creating a sometimes hazardous situation. Increasing the width of the garage and bringing the garage forward will allow us to incorporate a mud room in the garage space. It also allows us to have direct access to the house from the garage. Our only other alternative for creating a mud room space is to add onto the house which is not an affordable option for us. . . City of Golden Valley I . Board Qf Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application "'0. · Date Received~... \~6. . BZA Meeting Date 1.. ~'t-'6' AmountReceived "5c> "" 1. Street address of property involved in this applicatiorr ~)IR.1 0 '61(70 (, 'o(?rl Av~> 2. Applicant' ~Y'I')<:tA ~ SiD H- C.bilideSL)DvTt; - ~R ,)<?V Name l.o fo J D (,- Ie (/} Lt J D(7{) Address A-tlK- c;,Jd€Mv{I~ City/State/Z" I ,c:542~ Business Phone 1ws!:>l1 L OJ 3ft, k, Home Phone Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner Signature of owner . To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. Variance Application Submittal: 'The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: ----L"/ Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. ~. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. -L- A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. ~ You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. . v' Variance application fee, as follows: $50 - single family residential; $150 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners tte to the variance ~PPlicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures Of all surrounding property' owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property c:::and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. I To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell thEm about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about Your project and gives them opportunity to comment. I If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the 8ZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of - possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ~iving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. MtWtt1l1 ?vIut- Print Name -- -Comment -- Signature ~~ L~/P/3!1_::i! H-z Address ~(p 70 ~W\rud: ~ _ Print Name Stature ~ ;t::~ Address 20{ .~ h-~fC ~ Comment -; Print Name Comment Signature .~ Address Print Name 1,ft K->1-~ -€I\~C )( Comment Signature J~J~ ; , i \Juci ' &11- '-.(.i, cL ..WtHLf) 61/ Address ~ &OFS"CA ~~ U Print Name 4.//e /J Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment ,",." "'- fignature 4L/-Ir'// ,I Address Address OJ~$~J~ 30 Jersey Ave. S. James Bunin & Marcia Kohn-Bunin . 03-07~31 . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 16, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 30 Jersey Ave. S. (03-07-31) James Bunin and Marcia Kohn-Bunin James Bunin and Marcia Kohn-Bunin own the house located at 30 Jersey Ave. S.(southwest corner of Jersey Ave. S. and Western Ave.). They are requesting five variances from Section 11.21 of the Zoning Code in order to allow the construction of a new deck to be attached to the existing deck on the rear of their house. When the applicant's contractor came to the Inspections Department to inquire about a building permit, it wasdetermined that variances would be required for the project to go forward. A survey was provided by the contractor that indicated the existing deck did not meet rear yard setback requirements. The new deck addition is proposed to have the same rear yard setback as the existing deck. Also, the survey indicated that the existing house and deck do not meet the side yard setback requirement of 15 ft. along the south side of the house and the front setback requirement of 35 ft. along Western and Jersey Aves. The project requires the following variances from the City Code: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. 6 ft. off the required 27 ft. to a distance of 21 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the existing deck. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. 6 ft. off the required 27 ft. to a di~tance of 21 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the existing deck. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(0) Side Yard Setback. 0.4 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 14.6 ft. at its closest point to the south side property line for the existing house and deck. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. 0.2 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 34.8 ft. at its closest point to the north property line for the existing house along Western Ave. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. 0.2 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 34.8 ft. at its closest point to the east property line for the existing house along Jersey Ave. S. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY James Bunin F"OR: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot I, Block I, RING'S COLONIAL ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 881.7 LOT 16 J> ~ o .. ::!. if c .. .. . 882.4 .881.6 Found Iron - ~ ~ tn tI.la QCQ _D:I . tQ tn" 0) c.i- ~Q :~ ~2 ~ - D:I "' WESTERN .A VENUE . 882.5 S 112.20 . BBJ." LOT 1 B85.0 x Drive o :T Q 3' 3' rYC-;~ ; to"> \ "2.- ~ '"",-\' 1- : ~ 0- " '" BB5.1 . _0.5 /7 885." . x-x-x-x It 884. 1 chain link.. fence 23.7 BB7.8 . 22.7 GFf=B87.8 Garage I\l ... ;" Found Iron 88.3.9 . [ 3' ~ deck ~ in J7.7 . B8.3.9 .,,0.2 ,y J7.08 chain link enca ><. o Denotes iron monument X 000.0 Denote;; existing elev. 14." (., 10 o HOUSE 75.8 B8.3.8 . 34.8 C:I tn . - ~ BB7.2 . a z ~ Q ~ Ci tn C:I tn. tn~ . - Q . ~ " ~~ - D:I "' tntry=8B9.5 Found Iron \ \ 887.5 . BENCHMARK: Top Nut Hydrant Elevation=888.21 ~ ~ ~ ~ > i ~ C:\EP\DRAW\1140J.DWG DEMARS-GABRIEL .D SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lone No. Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone:(763) 559-0908 I hereby certify thot this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om 0 duly Registered land Surveyor under the =U~ .S;: of Minnesota. David E. Crook ~ deck 1I'E=8B5. J ~ - 27.0 57.2 ><. BB8.! . :;:1 ~I plat ><. LOT 2 Minn. Re9. No. 22414 File No. 12179 Book-Page 414-54 Scale 1"=30' . . . The existing house was constructed in 1975. An addition to the house was done in 1980. This addition was made to the southwest corner of the house (12 .5 ft. by 21 ft.). A building permit was taken out for this addition and the survey indicated it would be built 15 ft. from the south property line. In 1991, the deck off the west end of the 1980 addition was built. The City did not require a variance for the deck at that time because the applicant submitted a plan indicating the deck was to be built on to the west end of the house prior to the construction of the addition in 1980. With that configuration, the deck met the rear yard setback requirement. For some reason, the Inspection Department did not see that the deck was built on to the 1980 addition and that it was into the rear yard setback area. Because the need for a variance was missed in 1991, a new survey was submitted indicating the current location of the building on the lot. Thesurvey also indicates that the existing house has three slight setback infractions that must be resolved prior to construction. If the BZA does not issue the variance for the new deck, it could choose to issue on the variances for the existing building. . . . .: .. FOR: 30 JERSEY AVE SO GOLDEN VALL Y, MN 55426 OWNERS :JAMES K. BUNIN AND MARCIA KOHN-BUNIN STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP WE HAVE SEVERE SETBACKS BECAUSE WE ARE ONA CORNER LOT WITH TWO BROAD FRONTAGES. THE EXISTING DECK IS NOT LARGE ENOUGH FOR US TO USE IT EFFICIENTLY. WE WISH TO ADD TO THE EXISTINGDECK BUilT 12 YEARS AGO WE WERE UNAWARE THAT THE ORIGINAL BUILDER, SELA, DID NOT GET A VARIANCE AT THAT TIME. ~ . City of Golden Valley I . , Board Qf Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office lJse Only: Application No. ' Date Receivedl...k'bQ" '." BZA Meeting Date'l4'N:3 Amount Received ..' ',. .so .. ,.' 1. Street address Aproperty involved in this aP.Plic~tiorr 60::.Ja ? ~ 4Y1/tJ Address rS d-b ~3J1~(?OO usiness Phone 101-yj3-Y9~ Home Phone Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of a II property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: mMs'~~J Bill n 1.).tj3Vh~~Bunl,J Print Name of owner J)ull--~/c~ Signature of 0 ner - To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction ofthe action applicable to this variance request,ifgranted, is not taken within one year. the variance expires. 'l~.J-~-;!: ~. , '~gnature of Applicant -- Variance Application Submittal: 'The fOllowing information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete applic,tion. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: -.i Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. / A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds forthe granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. .- You may submit detailed description of building(s)) addition(s), anda/teration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. Variance application fee, as follows: $150 - other .-. . t ' Si~n~ttire$OfSurrouncling Property Ow~ers 1 " Noteto the variance applicantj As part of the variance application process, 'you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property' owners; This. includes all propertie,s a,butting the applicant's property and directly acro,s5 the streE!t. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . . . . I To obtain these signatures, you will 'need to personally v,isit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we ,encourage yqu to bring 'along a copy of your building plans) and have them' sjgn the area, below. The signature is meant.only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity toc.omment. . . . . . t If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home'~ and then write their addr~ss. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and. place of the BZA meeting. . . . Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of ny possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be eceiving a written notice informing you of the ti~e and place of the variance meeting. . By signing this form, you are only veri'fying that you have been'to'" about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object. to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regard;,g the project. , Print Name ~kG: O~~ ,~omment Print Name. ( jOa.~J\I\ () Yl 40 n Comment Address 60 tf:s:e~~b / Signature Address ~~ 5.!:J-1~ Print Name ..--:-- ,\ lA~ \/ I S\~~Y, . Comment Signature CJ4b~6Q ~~ Address 3Z;;~c-S~<;' Print Name Comment Signature Address ,I Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment ,gnature Address " .. . 6585 N..Cortlawn Circle Marc Nanna . 03-07-32_____~-c,= . . . . . Planning 763.593.80951 763.593.8109 (fax) Date: July 17, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 6585 N. Cortlawn Circle (03-07-32) Marc Nanne, Applicant Marc Nanne owns the house at 6585 N. Cortlawn Circle east of the Church of the Good Shepard. He is requesting a variance from Section 11.21 of the City Code in order to allow for the construction of a covered porch on to the front of the house. This porch addition is proposed as part of other improvements to the house that do not require variances. A survey of the property at 6585 N. Corti awn Circle was in the City files. This survey indicated that a porch added to the front of the house would require a variance. An updated survey was provided to the City with this variance application indicating the location of the proposed building additions and the front porch that encroaches into the front setback. The proposed covered porch requires the following variance from City Code: . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code requires that all structures be set back at least 35 ft. from a front property line or street right-of-way. Thevariance request is for 4 ft. off the required 35ft. to a distance of 31 ft. at its closest poinfto the front yard property line for the proposed front porch addition. The City's file on this property reveals that the house was built in 1958. No additions to the house other than interior improvements have been made since the house was built. There have been no other variances granted to this property. w. BROWN LAND . . 59/-02 76 36 SURVEYING, INC. WOODROW A. BROWN. R.LS. President SAN MH Top- 891.18 Inv.-8B1.08 890.0x Spot Elevation - 8030 Cedar Avenue South Suite 228 . ~=i(f52j:'-~ Survey For: fox (952)854-4268 '" N NOTE: Utility easement is per marc anne plat of CORnAWN ADDmON 2ND SEC110N. No Sea~h Was made for any additional easements Scale: 1 "=30' ---. - - - o .., 891.4 TC 91.3 Te CORTLAWN oft ~.&.. O! .. ~ \ '\ / I \J I ~cq ~ ~I I ~I U" To~' c ~ l o f 8 J. ,~(,..,.. CI ~ L b"f- l'O ~:;l{ tY' 889 ................ .8 . C\J "': - 0) ......i ~ d (::! 0) cO ~ - 1-- () & V ~'f~:1 10:-5 JC 884.1 . -...I , f-- () - I --.I --1 10 ~-, . Denotes Iron Monument Found Denotes Iron Monument Set o NORTH -x --- Fence PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 3. Block 2. CORTlAWN ADDITION 2ND SECTION. Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. w. BROWN LAND SURVEYING. INC. ~~,..~ Woodrow A. Brown, R.L.S NO. 15230 Dated: June 27, 2002 June 25, 2003. Utility Easement 1 of 1 20d OE12~vSB-2S6 hPOOf'l ~v2:BO EO 92 unf' I I ..~ .. ,woo ,"" mUL I n 3,rJLFJ..QOR -,:L L ..J ~ ___ -' TILEL _ TILE _ I I L. CROSS SECTION SCALE 1/4"=1'0" NOTE: CONTRACTOR/OWNER TO VERI -. ~ = - '-""-'-,- ..,. 'r",' - '~'~.,Tc7'~-----""-'-'-'I~'~''''-:c:-'---r--'~-j '. :r . .-._.-l.=....::r:.~ . - _.1 '- 1.___.1.... .-., -.-.... _~----L. --.--.-.....l.-..--L - .,1 --I. , 'r f!. . _ . ' . I . ., , 1 r , J t I ',' ~ t ' " , 1 , .; --- ,.-' '-IE-'-" '. _.-L-rJ-l__.._c.-J. _'0 .__-.1.____..__ _-J. --- . --1---" - ~ 1 :...' ~ 1 i.'?.l' .. ._.--1 __...J -- '. ., · ....J ---J.._Z-_.J----l .__.L--L I I I -1 ____ ,---L-~._! . --L. -l.- -4...; . .1.-. ~ ' ", . . , I I : I . t , ~ ~ ~ . . ! . I . " , ...-:- '. ' "'-_.-.. "1'- . . - . ..-......-. t .-..........---... '. , .'- .. ,..._ ". ',--:-~ ' . _...._-......--l..-J...~ ...t.....-i (. I · t, . \ . ~--'---1-rJ. " .L-J- ~ _._~'_:=....:r:. J ,I t ~1"';'~J. -::::_.----.-...1.. ' j :: i ~ L J' .i.-:....:......:~ =: ;: ~ i. ~ : : :': '::;~ ::+ ~:~~~~~~....--..~ -l~::::C:_L f' .j'. ... i ' ..' ~ I j :~.' ' ~--L- t .1 1 t ~ ---,..--L :: i ..-L__..L-.JI !., i~ ~. . .---------- ~. . ..........._J.. --l. -l I 1 ,I. J. _-_......l. , .. .;:~: ! ] ~.. I I ' " . , ~ I L _.:__.t....-..J_..!~ . ' ..1" . 'i-- . 1. t.....L I j I . I 1 ! " t I I ~ ., "'1 I 1 t ' · .....--------.......~.. ":Jf'^J~; '-'4 7':--............ ".. ~ :. ~ .-.. ~----'-. ~ .....-.........-.~.. , _-.4.__',.. L'.r"-] .J1'~ ...-.....___ :.:. ~. ~-J I 1 ~ t I ~~~~-:~_; ,_~_l I · I.-::! .J~___, ! :~:2.. ~ 1'~T.L-::::-r:1" -If~f'. J~" ~. .......It:.,., .,.:..t'J.. ::,1. .' .,~. ~ >:'::1 ~ i "---'-.J...[ 1 ;:f:. I I I I · t '1 ' , ---!' ") . . .', . .. _ ~ . '. . .... .~~,. I ---. .--'.-.1... . ----"--'--.........- .--i- . -4,.._ . . .1. . " , ..... . ._ -r '~ . i . . ''', j I ..-L--- I L I l I.!..' I. 1 . a. . _. '. .' .' . _ F7 t ._.1 T:-~----l-.J.....:.:::r:r~-L.-::..L_J....J-:-:-:- !_l.~:~~ ~f"I:'.-A~/4It, \:..-f; ~.~ J~ ...~q~jH t.,,-- '1. .t-;-i-.. .- j .. ""',. ".f.t.. I I I .~. . .....:'.... ...... t~4!- [] [] 'm~1~ D . == !~D.~ r 1iJ.. IQJ.D ~ 1 0 ~ t ]1:1.@'\11;:;:: f~"l rt:! J..Y:1.'~ "d~', ~tJ ~ '7 " r'J jrTfi/1 ..ft!'! j~ t~ D [] ,'," 1 if liD []= 1 ~ U 0 :: 11 . : l. \ .;flt J f f~j '.01 ' IT, j t r-' " '!"'r r . ," Y " fT tf.11.:..}r~~ :' 1- lif 1 J I . 'i ~i U'. '~l ~'.'-Tr '-- -.!i~1' ''1 .... lr': J- M...~'~- 'j-=="P' U' r, /:....1 tU.lL. I r f III U ~ i IH ~ U I! I, 11. 1 / . u.t.. I 1 . -I 1. .'. I .. "ill, '1~~rr!J1'rr ~fJl U i ff 1 J lt~'~l It ; IT f f . tj~ 1 ~1 H J I 1j ff::"~, I UD 1. ..... ~ ~r T,. r'i rvfl..I. ]::. ...-~r'lnnrrT- fTf'J;apll ~r InTI .'tl ! U I .LJ'-g-rTF I~f'!'l' ff'. ifrri'fTITJT 'Im' lj"..l1Il'JII! 1!lIJu ;'.1.. ..' ~.t,~ ~ ' .: r frtH1Tl n~rnJTi ... f I ruf I TIJ IJ 111 ! IPr .1 . _~. "'" FRONT ELEVATI SCALE 114"=1'0" . . .B SITE: - J I I I I I " <S' ~ ii .-. . &,. I~I ~~ I "'~ H .1 I ~ ~ N I I "'~6' UJ ~il" " I Ii . ~xl~~~N~ ___ ~~fJ;{:1'( ~ I KITCHEN ! ~~_=fB~ o~[~ "" DobR---- 'FUR WRLl::~)- p::l Rli-FG I I' ~ I' AS NEEDED'" ~I l '-I If- J I ~ "- _ Il - - - --', -,Lj nE~\Jc- --"" - - ~ -lstRNO- - -.- -- ~+/,_ = ==--:;--~-=---==-"',-=r-= I ~~~~ 'V-STl G....w.flL.L -_........_.::;;;;...-==-.... _ -=--='::""---. - '-:. -' - ',~)' /'\ [. I 23'-7)-GIRDER TRUS~ ::; ~.'Ki ~EMOVE "~6' / ' .' " - Is lid " , z: Xd1'~~NG " ~ ~ ~ G YER "'] '. ;~r;- ~:,--~ <0;'-- -------~:~2--;;/..'1-- '~ !!~~~~-:- ~~:~-::~:!~ ~ ~ flSTING -',~/~il' ~~;) 'DI'-TETTE ,DROOM 4. /'" ' II. I ..... a!p" M.'l i~ v~ / ' '. \. i=...., !~:= ' ~<<:v' , ~i= ~ l: I~ = 10' ~-G OR WI.; Ij, ~(<S')-" _ ~ B'(J QJlOlS_ BENCH.~ i 16 FACIA-~ ~ 2-121~<L ~ ll' __ I . I ~<J~~L_!::_._:..._:.:.: ~ _~.. / ~I.~MF' TRIO" ~ """ I' CFELP243G 111'-0" 'I'i '- _ 1\ CCM2848~2 / (s). ""OC g ", lS)o "t 12'~1\3/4" -f-_m- --~t3;-=-0;' --~-'--::~1~6~-0;?~-::~'~:~ : 5'-113" ~ M M 27''S:11'' FACIA 9'-j I . N. ICOVERED CON9 I ~ N. ;: (S) :;. I S~'~ +b k. Ie I ;: _ _ _ ~ .J'-8A~~J~O~~UL :~ !!~ _ _ JtF~.r~~S'_ I r~ .:::"~ !'l I "" OPTOP CHO - r~~riURL GRBIlE TRUSS ~ 1.~" I "----- T ~~ ~ ~ FACiAlt - - - - I-- -~TAPEAEO COLUMN: - - - - - - - - f- f- f- - -'u. -6X6 TR.60 POST W/2X4 WRLL 24"ABOVE STOOP C\ W/CULTUREO STONE VENE 10 ~; ,. ) I ~F ;1= , ; 1 , . ! . ! ; . FACIA 11" 11" '1'- 0" 7'-8" 11" 11" 1'-~0" 5'-2" 11" 11" 1'- 0" 15" 9'-6" 7'-0" 15" -WRRP 6X6 POST W/TR.40 FORM TRPER; COVER W/3 TRIM W/1X4 R CEDAR; US BRSE TRIM lie 2X8 R CEO 19'-0" 17'-11" . -- - 36'-11" - .. FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4"=1'0" . City of Golden Valley I Board qf Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office .use Only: Application No. Date Received I.e>~ ~ BZA Meeting Date ""1. .'2.")..: Amount Received' Sb 1. Street address of property involved in this applicatior'l: lc~"..<;..N.~A-I~..~;G~(~Vcl\O j ~u. 2. Applicant: I Mfttc ~V\t'k&\~ tJ ~tUL. Name I. (,<;<lC; N. ~{+t~h ~Y^u&- G~~~v~ll~ t-r,J $1'Yu I Address City/gt~te/Zip t-,/'LSg<{"'L~L<6 1k.1-S'Ltl- ~Colfl (~IL)1rc- ~11 \ Business Phone Home Phone Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner Signature of owner To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application. are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. ~, 6,. Y\v Signature of Applicant ~ - Variance Application Submittal: 'The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: i/ V V v .- Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. V". A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanatiqn of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, orother evidence, if ~ppro. priate.. We. v..n \~{<-':l to;, t'-'--1 &-. -(~-+ -i., ..f) f,".d"" Dh -tl..A. Uoi-;'h.~ <."':U0\0 (-'ff -s"""..j\ $L-"'-1\~ <,J......:. tv.. 14..c:-1., ~+~Q. - Ck You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involvecfin 10., "- this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. Variance application fee, as follows: @- single family residential; $150 - other . . I \ \JJ (L \..:~" ~ . . '. i i i \" l<-*,,)X /rW:-:ttll'\J\ Q.'v~4111~ ' , i I r /, IV ,.1 f\" i ~ Iwc;,,--~ 1.:) "-1 -P-{U\lV-'\:- '\ (,-"1\.. \...- P . " I ) O~""';;'- I ""'~f'~-v"'-\~- C 'v-- 0 &- It' I,~ t7 11~ I <U _ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n" L~::-\ b """,0L~ct 1-0"(:< SCh<~- "1, L'''-'-''''-~;C+''l ~ <~u:+,,- ""~ +'N- .~+krY;_ w" "'~ b<4~~ :> + 'f- (,,,"--+ <--t1":)",,,,-l~(.) . -("<,\.~ -t\..-Q.. 5-L-+1 ~,-<..,JL- L\,...., ~\JV'--+ b~ ...f.l1iL -4:\6\;....1)<'_. ~ \.:j. rth L_ \;-' '-'- \ ~ (...\Vd .b ~ '. :-;1JI (t fi.) ....i 10 ..) ,j f ' d C",-,,-,-, , rIJ:...... ~t~ ('t'>v,,- '-V~ L<;3"1 i '-t. J.l/~ ,h....c C'\t.- ,tb i t...{,,-,y' .$'-o we:-' _,.1. c:> t. . .. r.. . '. ":........ ~....... t '-" h b 'b" ''t\) r'" Lv. t'--"'-<..O I..v '-1 L" i I-v s.eA Lb-(:.. L ~ X ct.,\" -4 +>::- v l~ . ......... '...' , L J ;Y.J~ I L \_ Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. ; If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the 8ZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of .,y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ~ceiving a written notice infOnning you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. Print Name E L EltNoR 6t4TT vI:' -Comment Signature ~a~ N~5t{ ~'1 C ,} Address GS~O ()pJ)~)7( M~' , Print Name Comment .nature ~d"~ T!i:JL Address G"~~ 1:: ('q>&nll.""/~( . . Print Name '. Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment .gnature c~ W tiJ -r rn rrtJ - -------- :s fJ1JlJR-4 l~ l GDE ~~cJ~ Address 0)Zr ) , / ~.I A..f . .-r/~ Address b~6:J c:S1 tifi1ii>>J-N Address Address Address " , ~ " . 65108. Cortlawn Circle Joan Thompson & Drew Hamre . 03-07~~33c . See Large Size Plans and/or Survey in Planning Department . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 17, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 6510 S. Cortlawn Circle (03-07-33) Joan Thompson and Drew Hamre, Applicants Joan Thompson and Drew Hamre own the house at 65.10 S. Cortlawn Circle. This house is located just west of the intersection of S. Cortlawn Circle and N. Cortlawn Circle. They are requesting variances from Section 11.21 of the Zoning Code in order to replace the existing deck with a new deck in the same location. When the applicant came to the Inspections Department regarding the deck replacement, a current survey was not in the file indicating the exact location of the buildings on the lot. A survey was then provided by the owner that indicates that the proposed deck (that is in the same location as the existing deck) will not meet both the front and side setback requirements. (The original deck was built in 1978 and received a building permit. However, surveys were not required with building permits at that time and the deck was built in a location thought to meet setback requirements.) The survey also indicates that the house does not meet the setback requirement along S. Cortlawn Circle. The garage is less than 35 ft. from the property line. In this case, however, a variance was granted in 1969 to allow the garage to be built within 33.2 ft. of S. Corti awn Circle. The survey also indicates that the existing house is built to within 34.94 ft. of N~ CorlawnCircle rather than the required 35 ft: The proposed deck replacement requires variances from the following sections of the Zoning Code: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code requires that all structures be set back at least 35 ft. from a front property line or street right-of-way. This variance request is for 2 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 33 ft. at its closest point to the front yard property line along N. Corti awn Circle for the deck replacement. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setback. City Code requires that principal structures be set back at least 15 ft. from a side property line. This variance request is for 0.1 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 14.9 ft. at its closest point to the northwest side yard property line for deck replacement. . . . · Section 11.21, Subd.7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code requires that all structures be set back at least 35 ft. from a front property line or street right-of-way. This variance request is for 0.06 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 34.94 ft. at its closest point to N. Corti awn Circle for the existing house. The survey also indicates that there is a shed located within the utility easement along the west property line. The policy of the BZA has been to require that sheds be removed from utility easements and placed in a location that conforms to the Zoning Code. Staff recommends that a condition of the variance approval be that the shed be moved by October 31 , 2003. The City's file on this address indicates that the house was built in 1962 and the garage was added in 1969. The deck was constructed in 1978. ; . Golden Valley, MN 55426 763~595-9522 July 1, 2003 Board of Zoning Appeals City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Dear Board Members: We plan to replace our existing deck, which is rotting. As you can see in the survey of our lot, the existing deck is over the thirty-five foot setback line at both corners. Our new deck, as indicated in the attached architect's drawing, would use the same footprint as the existing deck. We are asking for a variance in order to replace the deck in its current position. . The shape of our lot constitutes a hardship in terms of remodeling. We have a triangular lot bordered on the north by North Cortlawn Circle and on the south by South Cortlawn Circle. The house sits near the rear of the lot facing the point where the two streets meet. On the south side the house sits on the setback line. On the north side where the deck is located, the northeast corner of the house sits on the setback line. Furthermore, our lot is at a higher elevation on the north side than it is on the south side. For these reasons designing a deck that does not cross the setback line at the corners is exceedingly difficult and thus constitutes a hardship. As both my husband and I will be out of town on the day of the July 22 board meeting, we have asked our contractor, Dave Styba of Styba Construction, to represent us in this matter. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincerely, ~~~ Joan E. Thompson . ,- City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application F . . ... . Application No, Date Received. BZA Meeting Date. Amount Received 1. Street address of property involved in this application: 65/0 SotA7kJ Cor-flawn C;t"C!/L/ 2. Applicant: J 00. y\ Name ----.. I h 0111 P.50y) I ~ Drew He{ mr~ 7b3-5crs-qS~:2 Home Phone G, /I I1tJ 55</1.6 City/State/Zip /:)t'ew , I;). - '1r7- <.j.;2 8'7 Cell Phone (;>/(J S. Address p(HJ b 1.1-3~.b ~~718' Business Phone Co t'f/a. W JIt C ; y, Jr~w~ AaYnYe.@ hr' CO~ Email Address 3. Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition, The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued, We wa"d -to re.p/o. c.(J. OLAr Y'ott/'!.jcrleck w.4eh t</-ecu:lot C\, -tou..y-sea.sor. }OorcA -ro fhe- bOl.c.k. o-f' +he house, Ol.fy oieck. , 4. is JOre.serJ/v av~y" +h-e. se.f/'~ck eJtf 60Th COYJ1ey.$, Ttrel-1ew o-l e 'e. Ie wdu / A. b e -f /, <, .> Cl. 1-'11 -e. c;;. ;' -z.. e. i j,.z T h. e.. .s C(. "'?(e J4/t:t <. e. Tit "t- To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also . understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. +A S t!--tGClC/::. l"'ne&lf'1. fOlAJ,-"seaS6Y1. por-c.h rJ&l~-e./~Y'.e. hoT ever', e req V1.e.s.1"~t!'1, Wovtlt7l i'1af be. IVlvolv"f!.A eh -fAe. Vt:tj'/4~C~ ~ ~Of~P~ - 5. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner Signature of owner .- Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: ~/ Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. L A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. / A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. /' You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit I is issued. _ Variance application fee, as follows: $50 - single family residential; $150 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly cross the street. If on a corner, this means aCross both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and n()tfound them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the 8ZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be receiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. Print Name 2}di-'T;;:rO ReG<>:5 Comment Signature ,~~ Address b J H> Af. {;Rf"L ~wtJ t rJ .. Print Name Comment Ignature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Address II () FIO^lJ~ Ci - -1-ft'YlAtA Address 65'10 {;or/~wn Cr, S ~f-J-1R~AJ :[) .~~IN V-~~ /lJ 01\/ T: 41J;;J1~ 0v 0- v'\." c. D a. ve., <::t-F 0... )I Typo b 'f1' 0 Du~ (!/iflpnJ ~o/lWr Address 6fCl:S7!.tJ~ e~ fi.:8 I v Address &'06 <SUrJjlU1JtW Print Name ~ 0:("\0 \}J c-tj ~ VY\C\ Y\ Signature (6~3 ~ Address "6 d.5 Co r1-lG..Q.J., (\ Print Name H,'/I//f.- Osfyow Comment ~ ~ ~,; o-w7U2--l____ ~ /~ Signature Address 6 S" / 5 ...5 Cort/Q.w 1"'v Print Name /<. ;-f"f. H; l/enbYt:th eX, Comment ~~<l- -tk.nr ~ J' ~ ~ ~ ~ Address /;,5 '3 5" .5 Corf/qwP1 v . ) Comment Signature oyflaWh '-." '. " '. New DeCK OVER EXISTING 91 ~I '- --.'---- @ I ~ 1 - L ~I_ --~ 4'-11' 4-SEA50N PORCH DINING ~I~ ~~ EXG, WOOD ~ UVING REMOVE EXG. CARPET fROM VvOOD flOOR . NEW AA1UNG TO MATCI1 EXISTING ",I 1 1 1 :t' 1 ~l 10' ~I ~I 1 .,1 liZ: 1 ~I UNTOUCI1ED ~I 1 ~, ~I 0, 1 1 iij, 1 1 '21 MASTER. BEDROOM PAUL'S BEDROOM L_____________;__ @ @ L _ _ I 3 MAIN LEVEL PLAN "AFTER" SCALE, 1/4"=1'-0" (24'x3G") OR 1/8'=1'-0" (II"xl?") HAMRElfH0MP5ON WINDOW SCHEDULE m QTY UNIT T\1'E MfGR. 1<.0. (WXH) WI'dJ. 'W' NOTES I 3 CCM3G60 CASEMENT MARVIN 3'-1' X 4'-11 Sta' 2X4 .34 MUNTINS 2 6 CCM32GO CASEMENT MARVIN 2'-S' X 4'.11 S/B' 2X4 .34 MUNTINS 3 2 CGLS040 GLIOE1<. MARVIN 5'-0 1/2' X 4'-0' 2X4 .34 MUNTINS 4 2 CCM32SG CASEMENT MARVIN 2'-S' X 4',7 SIB' 2X4 .34 EGRESS 5. 7 CAWN3624 AWNING MARVIN 3'.1' X 1',11 Sta' 2X4 .34 EE ELEVATION G Kl CAWN4024 AWNING MARVIN 3'-5')( I'-IIS/B' 2X4 .34 EE ELEVATIO 7 I CCM2BS62W CASeMENT MARVIN 4',S' X 4'.7 S/B' 2X4 .34 EGRE5S 8 2 CCM2848 CASEMENT MARVIN 2'.S'X 3'-11 S/B' 2X4 .34 EGRESs S 4 CAWN3624 AWNING MARVIN 3'.I'XI'-IIS/B' 2X4 .34 I5iNGLE-GLAZEc MARVIN SPECifiCATIONS, T\1'ICAL WINDOW TO BE ALUMINUM CLAD. COLOR TO BE 'WHITE.' GlASS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE TO BE DOUBLE-GLAZED, LOW-E WlTIH ARGON GAS, PROVIDE SCREENS fOR All OPERATING WINDOWS. INTERIOR WOOD TO BE SHIPPED UNfiNISHED. HARDWARE TO BE T\1'ICAL 'BRONZE.' MUNTINS TO BE 7/B' 'SIMULATED DIVIDED LITES' (SOL) WITH SPACER BAI<.5 (SEE ELEVATIONS fOR MUNTIN PAffiRN). I'dJ.INTERlOR CASING IS TO BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALlED BY BUIIDEI<. EXTENSION JAMBS W1HERE NECESSARY. TO BE fACTORY~NSTI'dJ.ED. CONTRACTOR TO CONfiRM MASONRY OPENINGS BEfORE ORDERING TIHE WINDOWS. 'f' ON TIHE ELEVATIONS INDICATES A LEGAL EGRESS UNIT. 'f' INDICATES A fiXED UNIT AND 'T' A TEMPERED UNIT. 22 NOVEMBER 2002 " I 1 I 1 I'., I I 1 1 1 1 ,,';>s. oS;:.. '",<,,~J' o . !'~4-J' .,s~~ "'''!C-t " ", STONE WALL 1 L 4'- 1'- @ ~ ~ ou z 2 <J) fUTURE GARDEN I' STONE WALL HAMRE/THOMF50N DOOR SCHEDULE fRONT DOOR TO BE 3'.0' X G'.B'. MATERIAL TO BE PAINT -GRADf WOOD; FINISH TO BE PAINT. A I COLOR TO BE 'EXTERIOR ACCENT' (SEE PAINT SCHEDULE). MANUFACTURER TO BE GENERJC. SEE BELOW fOR HARDWARE. PROVIDE A MATCHING WOOD STORM DOOR WITH A SCREEN INSERT. HINGE fiNISH TO MATCH HAROWARE fiNISH. DINING ROOM AND PORCH DOOl<.5 TO BE 2"6' X G'-I\'. MATERJAL TO BE WIHITE ALUMINUM TO B 3 MATCH WINDOWS. SEE BELOW fOR HARDWARE. PROVIDE MATCHING DEADBOLTS. PROVIDE A MATCHING STORM DOOR WITH A SCREEN INSERT fOR THE DINING ROOMAJECK DOOR ONLY. HINGE fiNISH TO MATCH HARDWARE. GAAAGE SERVICE DOOR TO BE 2'.10' X 6'.8'. SffiE TO BE 5.PANEL MATERJAL TO BE STEEL C I FINISH TO BE PAINT. COLOR TO BE 'OOERJOR ACCENT' (SEE PAINT SCHEDULE). SEE BELOW FOR HARDWARE. PROVIDE A MATCHING DEADBOLT. HINGE FINISH TO MATCH HARJDWARE. OVERHEAD GAAAGE DOOR TO BE 16'-0' X 7'.0'. SffiE TO BE FLUSH. MATERJAL TO BE STEEL D I FINISH TO BE PAINT. COLOR TO BE 'EXTERIOR TRJM' (SEE PAINT5CHEDULE). NOTE HORIZONTA CEDAR 2X2'S ADDED TO THE GARAGE DOOR. FINISH TO BE PAINT ALONG WITH TIHE DOOR. STOAAGE DOOR UNDER PORCH TO BE 3'-0' XG'.B'. STYLE TO BE fLUSH. MATERJAL TO BE E I STEEL fiNISH TO BE PAINT. COLOR TO BE 'EXTERIOR ACCENT' (SEE PAINT SCHEDULE). HINGE fiNISH TO MATCH HARDWARE. fRONT DOOR HARJDWARE TO BE MANUfACTURED BY BALDWIN. MODEL TO BE 'NEW YORK' #6562. fiNISH TO BE 'OIL RUBBED BRONZE' #.102. HING fiNISH AND STORM DOOR HARDWARE TO MATCH HARDWARE fiNISH. T\1'ICAL INTERIOR DOOR TO BE MANUfACTURED BY GENERIC. MATERIAL TO BE fLUSH HOLlOW~ORE WOOD. fiNISH TO BE PAINT. COLOR TO BE 'INTERJOR TRJM' (SEE DOOR SCHEDULE). SEE PLANS FOR INTERIOR DOOR SIZES. T\1'ICAL HARDWARE TO BE MANUfACTURED BY BALDWIN. MODEL TO BE 'ClASSIC KNOB' #5405. FINISH TO BE 'OIL RUBBED BRONZE' # .102. HINGE fiNISH TO MATCH HARJDWARE ANISH. FROVIDE FRJVACY LOCKS fOR ALL BEDROOMS AND BATIHROOMS. UNDERCUT BATHROOM OOORS I' FO~ BmER VENTILATION. 22 NOVEMBER 2002 0" ...., ...., ADD TO EXISTING A:2EI:lALL. -EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVE ~ ',- ~~ 0..02 <0 OUf- ~~ Uo.. i5~ u0 \!)Z zt= f=.!Q l[5 EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN REPAIR EXISTING HOLES IN ASFHAL T - - +- - - - - - --. - - - - . - - - - - - ~ - - -- I __:J - - - - --"-._- --. - - - -------- ----- - -- --- - -: - - -- - - --\"--- - - - - '., 35' STREET fRONT SETBACK ....., " " " " ., " $ ~ ROBERT GERLOFF RESIDENTIAL ARC H ITECTS ll!927.S913 4017 SlUIOIl AYE I" SeUTN .'''IAPOlll,I'U1SOTI55410 ~ o CZi ~ S o ~ '& ...c: 2 ~I ~ c........8<n :: [""'""" ,- c:l ~ U .is ..s:: _!:: S; ~ 1,,\,1 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ a -2 l-:l 6 ~ .., _y u . :: ""O..c: >. .9 <l-I co ~ Q)='== t:i S 0 <'.:I 6 (I)> :: 0 c ~ ~;;:;.g ::c \0 8 ~ (]) ;.... Cl 22 NOVEMBER 2002 :1 ~ .,,?- ~ . 401SunnyridgeLane Lynne Gaardsmoe . 03-07-34 . See Large Size Plans and/or Survey in Planning Department . Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 17, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 401 Sunnridge Lane (03-07-34) Lynne Gaardsmoe, Applicant . Lynne Gaardsmoe is the owner of the property at 401 Sunnyridge Lane. The property is located on Sunnyridge just south of Woodstock Ave. The applicant is requesting one variance from Section 11.21 of the Zoning Code to allow for the expansion of the existing one-car garage located at the west end of her lot. This garage has alley access only. The applicant received several variances in 2000 when she added a second story to the house. At that time, the existing garage received variances to make it legally non-conforming. The house also received afront yard setback variance to make it legally non-conforming. The second story addition received a variance in order to allow it to be built within 6 ft. of the property line rather than the required 8 ft. (20% of the 40 ft.lotwidth.). The second story addition variance was required because of a cantilever into the setback area. Since the existing garage already received a variance for its location too close to the alley (street) and side property line, the proposed garage addition requires a variance only for tht3...~ideproperty line where it will continue the same side setback as the existing garage. . .. .. The following variance is requested in order to permit the garage expansion: · Section 11.21 , Subd. 12 Accessory Buildings. City Code states that accessory building such as detached garages must be set back at least 5 ft. from a side property line. The variance request is for 3.9 ft. off the required 5 ft. to a distance of 1.1 ft. at its closest point to the south side yard property line for a proposed garage addition. A review of the City's file indicates that there is no information about when the house was originally constructed. . "U "..Vff.'''''' . ~ ip , .. . 1121 Angelo Drive . Cheryl Scruton 03-07 -35 . . . . . Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 17, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 1121 Angelo Drive (03-07-35) Cheryl Scruton, Applicant Cheryl Scruton owns the property at 1121 Angelo Drive. It is located just north of Thotland Rd. She is requesting three variances from Section 11.21 of the Zoning Code in order to allow the construction of an addition to the west side of her existing house. The applicant came to the City to discuss the process to receive a building permit for the addition. A current survey of the property was not in the City's file for this property. The applicant was asked to provide a current survey and this was done in order to determine the location of the existing house and proposed addition. The proposed addition is one-story and will be 16 ft. by 30 ft. It fills in the area behind the house and north of the garage. It will be used for a bedroom and bathroom. The survey indicates that the house does not meet current front or north side yard setback requirements. The proposed addition would be built at the same setback along the north side yard property line. The proposed addition requires variances from the following sections of the Zoning Code: · Section f1.21~SlJbd. 7(A)Front Yard Setback. City Code requires that the front yard setback shall be 35ft. from the front yard property line or street right-of-way. The variance requested is for 5 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 30 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Angelo Dr. for the existing house and deck. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setback. City Code requires that the side yard setback shall be 15 ft. The variance requested is for 6 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing house. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setback. City Code requires that the side yard setback shall be 15 ft. The variance requested is for 6 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 9 ft. at its closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed room addition. The review of the City's file on this property indicates no original building permit for the house. The garage was built in 1956 and the deck was rebuilt in 1994. A variance was not required for the deck in 1994 because it kept much of the original decking and footings. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: Cheryl Scruton 1121 Angelo Drive Golden Valley, MN . , I" . 7' ~..(; - ':;- . , .,."r '; :..... t) l " . , -/-,.., , c' 0 .... 'I . -131.lCf-S89057'4-1.."/tI- I . I ~! I j;'i'''~ {b_ - -~ ---I I J- , .'. I I iH{.J/ l,' I Nt), /1.3/ 1-.5 - P ;30 I I I""' -/37.58-'- F..A57- I 'lC I : 1)-. " 1/ ~ /'Ib, II;! /."- 2-s'-F ~ ~ I ,~ , \X:l ,~ t\J <> ~ I ""'" c-... l'r\ ~ 2t1 1'(<;(:; f" ~ 6A1lA6~ '" ... .71 ~eck _ _ ~ _ _4? _ _ i1i.t_J<_ . 2'1 .' '. >.,., " } '~',' '-~: ,.. . ,'. ;~., . U 3-] )( \ t I- I I Lol /() I ARM:r If; 2~7,4- f~frf" ,. 1<.. I I ~ / I',' 'r L: .._. ., I .",.' -:'", r - \~.- f ~':Jb: ~~Wd r;d:rM~' / A6~S$ Legal Description: Lot 10, Block 2, THOTLAND'S TWIN VIEW TERRACE. Benchmark: TNH, SW, Angelo Drive@ThotlandRoad. N.G.V.D. 1929 adjusted elevation = 875.25 feet. "her:by certify ~~t this survey was prepared by me or under ~lY dIrect SUpervISIon, and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Surveyed by me this 9th day of July, 2003. . J(g7b~S- J.L - - --4 -I sO 9 78.7b i7'-/. 76 .10 .~ " " ~ ~ v )I BI.(, I l .. ... ~ \lQ ~ o N ~ '1 I ~ . "'I ~ ,. 8S'Z.c. Jo ~7Z.ll --- Scale: 1" = 30' o Denotes iron monument xOOO.o = Existing elevation Bearings are assumed JL6i Herb F. Lemire RLS Minnesota Reg. No. 3349 4416 Abbott Ave. N Robbinsdale, MN 55422 Phone: 763.537.0497 .~l ~ ~ ~ \:: ~ ';t "" i . TO: City of Golden Valley . . Re:Reasons for hardship as pertaining to variance for addition at 1121 Angelo Dr. Due to the natural topography of our backyard, which slopes steeply towards the backside (west) foundation of the house, we have an ongoing problem of water in the basement, which leaves it totally nonfunctional. We have been removing water since the snow melted Due to house.Iocation, the addition to be completed could only be situated on the backside of the house. Due to the fact we have aging parents, we need to have a bathroom on the main level, as well as a guest bedroom, which would be accessible for their use. Due to prior additions to the house, we have 4 different rooflines adding to the water/drainage problem. This addition would eliminate those problem areas and draw the runofTaway from the foundation. ,. .- City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: . . . - . Application fl,Jo. . Date Received aZA Meeting Date Amount ijeceived . 1. Street address of property involved in this application: 4nj?LQ()1' < 6oue... VA-It,,! Applicant: Rnse-6'tLrne, 11- . / Cleryl SCf'u--+O~ Name / l (~.t 4~ 0~/j~ VA (J" Address Ci J I~ I . 2. Business Phone 7bJ- J'2c; .?J 1 J j Home Phone ~(J. -Jff E: "~JJ.7 Cell Phone 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: We &rflftll-c; dA-l';{/ &-t'~ff1Y\ 71.0 Print Name of ownerS . Signature of ownerS " To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. 9~~titc(jtk Signature of G nt Variance Application Submittal: The following information. must be submitted by the application deadline to mGlke a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property OWners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for th~ granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. . You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. Variance application fee, as follows: $50 - single family residential; $150 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the. variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the, signatures of all . surrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property, and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the,. time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This isan application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of &y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You. will also be ~ceiving a written notice infonnlng you of the time and place of the variance meeting.Ely signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. Print Name ~r-4 tVc fvl A'S~ /If} -!4V\J v\/ -~_._----- Comment J~. 1t1~fin [L'j/{ /71 ~ Signaturel Address / f ~ f Al06-C Lu elL / Print Name i~G<<dt>./fi'.- r N ~ '- 13 '1 ~ IU -(-"'" :) L- ~r 17-1~JV( /7r! D-vt:",,)V--E td; ~T) Address;/5V'~6~ Comment .nature . Print Name omment ~tlr() t\ cJ- B~ b !1a -rf, ~<; on I . ~~~ Sig"ature ~o f!-kt~~ Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment .nature -)~ hn 't }r/tN1 Address lilt{} ~ e{1Q Address -r4 -fj;~d . A:-r~r&O' -[W(!17... ---; /lA9 ~ "C...---'- Address Address Address I/-~ y(~ p~ ~ _JjJ I , <:\ ~ l < 'i ~ 'I The scale is 1/8" : l' o 1 ~ D ~ 2 3 l ( t ~ " .c ~-A) ~. ..s e \c! . ~J "" 5 "'~''''.'.' '\. .... ), .' / L / e( e)Q:( 6 ej I I i Garage 7 )Q~r . '.. .1. . 0" .,~ rl ..' Ell .~ ILabel1 9 I<~ 't: . (1,1) ----.... E~tf;.., j~-.c. furl. ~ .... ---.. ., Lot. P/QhJ 1Ll;+i.~ 1}Jd(~:5j: IlaJ I}n~e:. 10 Or I ("J'.;) &,) I!~ \1,' AI't1'{/ ~ .~ . -" f . , .,r , '. . 7810 .EwaldTerrace AudreyZi.belman & JanLeS.uer . 03-01_"037 . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 17, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 7810 Ewald Terrace (03-07-37) Audrey Zibelman and .Jan LeSuer, Applicants Audrey Zibelman and Jan LeSuer own the house at 7810 Ewald Terrace (southeast corner of Winnetka Ave. S. and Ewald Terrace). They are requesting a variance from one requirement of the Residential Zoning Code (Section 11.21) to allow for the construction of a conforming family room addition proposed to be built on the north side of the house. The applicant came to the Inspections Department proposing to build the addition. Since a current survey of the property was not available, the applicant had a survey prepared indicating the location ofthehouse on the lot. The survey indicated that the house does not meet the side yard setback requirement of15 ft. for the east side of the house. Since the proposed addition is conforming, the City staff allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" agreement form in order to receive a building permit for the construction prior to the issuance of the variance to make the house legally nonconforming. The City staff agreed to the "Hold Harmless" agreement only after the applicant submitted the required survey and application materials. The signed "Hold Harml.ess" agreement is attached. The following is the requested variance: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)5ide Yard Setback. City Code requires that the side yard setback shall be 15 ft. The variance request is for 0.4 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 14.6 ft. at its closest point to the east property line for the existing house. The survey indicates that the addition will be close to the existing pool. The pool is being removed as part of the work done at the house. The City's file on this property indicates that the house was constructed in 1963. The building footprint has not been increased since the house was constructed. No other variances have been granted to this address. City. of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application F # pplicabon No. . Date Receive. ~ 0.3 .. BZA Meeting Date?'" z.z,-d~ Amount Received 5o.;t;b. 1. Street address of property involved in this application: -J-Y3l0 C\lJaJl &~4.(tb/ 2. Applicanl: ..J1vl. ~'1 Z b.J<1<\.6.t\ Name \ 19 it) ErJ.Jl1JJTaYA ell A~r(1~ ?~V - t1-13 (fid-n2l1 '":f6 ~ 1 ~'-D ?-z I Business Phone Home Phone 1 e. Su r{( b () ftR)). (JJ~ Email Address ... ~ .:l: Le-S ttc r G~\J~D~ City/Slale/Zip . .. .,. rold-:J.{, if -J-'1 0 W Id--~':>f- f)~IL~ Cell Phone .... Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and aLteration(s) involved in this petition. The site . plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance thatmay be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. . t-Xf-<Mf2)~ ,,1aJ, ~'" J ~ Ou~ ( "D v/z'., ,:1D ) f) f k~le-lu~h~ ~~~ ~l. N'''J . t..ll~hw. /Ii~: ~ ~D"", ..~~.Jg<L\r'(j <j-- \~cJ>\ ( ""V~ ') <2x1-v-t "J {g' k'1o H. j Lv I' """- t sfrvJt,~, 4. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action apPlict/ b Ie OlhiS. variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires . ~ 5. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: . Print Name of owner Signature of owner Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete plication. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on .survey requirements. A briefstatement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. Variance application fee, as follows: $50 - single family residential; $150 -other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all .rrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly ross the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasionsandJ'lotfound them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner nothome" cind then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be receiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. (::::e Sl".~ j:Le-4tk~s ~'i Signature Address - Print Name -'f0 'An ..f '1 ~Y>\.- \ S """~ .1: 1M- .mment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature ~int Name ~mment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature .int Name Comment Signature -j~ Addre$$1~ b ZttlPH-'Vdt. ',1.. ~ ~(") rf )c J ~\J:'" -t &4-11" - 8%. ~ Addre$$~ I) lZva..)j J ~h~)q Jl~ ) r;#IYl~H gAfFvDPm '-I~Ovki.-r O~7' ~4 Address 7rt1llAh~~ ' ./ .. AddressZ-O. AJI/1Jf.G/~~ /fre... g 6W!~ ~7 hjl'l SSlIJ-b. Address Address Address . . 1-61 0 ECvaJj t~rCL Street Address "HOLD HARMLESS' I, :J::. ~ S ve.Y' . a~uesting the City ll_Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) ~~ (O~ 'i~ I! .. \i ,,"- · . onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. . ~ ~C- ~t-t~ ~1 ~ cb P ii:Nvrvl:j . .... t:J()~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 1s~ ~~ ./ ~~.' II ~ ! ~ ~ 4- U>~Q <t ~~ Q DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor LtuJe No. Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone:(763) 559-0908 Far :(763) 559-0479 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ,/-B96. '" .,. r","'''''''h''' ' " t:SR27Ji7t:ArE OF SUBYEY - PH.8'PARSORJ.JZ- Sa w.l1orse .Design &- BU11ders Lega.! Oescr.ipt.ion .lot ~. B./ock s: ElfA.l1J TERRACE PH.D A.D.D/7'/OH N . Penotes found i.ronmonument o lJeootes set iron monument xooa 0 .lJenotes existi/1$ ele v. 4 9)' j.B Area =- ./8. 773. 28 Sq: .Ft. I \S ! " o<(\6~ ({t6 I G~ \0 (j6 0' .r- /" O. SBO...",: '--\ . ".,c .<?3~ / ..l~o: ~ / . (j~5 P~cllij ,. ~ f a () ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / I I {..,/'} I / / II'Coq .I'~C6 l,; z Lot ~ ~~ ~~ ~'l;s ! lis ir ~ ~~ ~(J-- ~ ~q, .(-j ~ tS~ x898. 7 .8w-a.ld ~- " .?er~ C7D e J bereby cerUly that tb1s survey plan or report "as prepared by me or UDder my directsuperviJlion and that I am a duly Rept.ered Land Surveyor UDder the laws or the State or Minnesota. ..u surveyed by me this 27th day of May, 2003. File No. 12130 '(B) Book-Page 416-2 ~."- David E. Crook Minn. Re8. No. 742414 Scale 1 -.110' .. " ~ . 335 Burntside Drive Jon Brusven . ..J)3-07-36.~ . '. . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: July 17, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 335 Burntside Dr..(03-07-36) Jon Brusven, Applicant Jon Brusven owns the house at 335 Burntside Drive near the intersection of Burntside and Westwood Dr. just south of TH 55. He is requesting a variance from one section of the Residential Zoning Code (Section 11.21) in order that he may construct a conforming deck on the southwest corner of his house. The applicant came to the Inspections Department to begin the process to receive a building permit for the deck. Since there was no current survey in the City's file for this address, the applicant had a survey done. The survey indicated that the existing house does not meet the side setback requirement along the south property line. The proposed deck, however, will exceed the required side and rear yard setback requirements. City staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" agreement form in order to receive a building permit for the construction prior to the issuance of the variance to make the existing house legally nonconforming. The City staff agreed to the "Hold Harmless" agreement only after the applicant submitted the required survey and application material. The signed "Hold Harmless" agreement is attached. The following variance is requested: · Section 11.21 ,Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setback. City Code requires that the side yard setback be 15 ft. The variance request is for 1.1 ft. off the required 15 ft. top a distance of 13.9 ft. at its closest point to the south side property line for the existing attached garage. A review of the City's file on this property indicates that the house was constructed in 1954. No othervariances have been granted to this property. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY fOR: JON BRUSVAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 4, GLENDALE, Hennepin County, Minnesota. / / ".2. N 880.40 ~" 0$. 4J ~O. Et,,~ ~~.. 878.61 . "3~..9"" JJ./ift *" 880.46 / + 879.30 / / .... ~~ .. q; .. '" ..~,,; ~~ ~ OJ' "J I f! q ol! :r f ~ ~ '! '/ Utility Pole ~ 876.75 ~ I I 180.0 plat 159.9 meas. S 89-21'35" E f d. . 878.19 aun. ,ran ~ ~ ~ ~ 878..13 ~ ~ 878.00 ~ ~ o R I V f: 877.85 879.26 879.04 878.83 \ \ o Denotes iron monument X 000.0 Denotes existing elev. - Denotes surface drainage DEMARS-GABRIEL ND SURVEYORS, INC. .30.30 Harbor Lane No. Plymouth. UN 55447 Phone:(76.3) 559-0908 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of ~te of Minnesota. . (.L J David E. Crook Date:~ C:\EP\DRAW\ 12157.DWG File No. 12157 Minn. Reg. No. 22414 Book-Page 416-17 Scale 1"=30' '. . . . TO: City of Golden Valley FROM: Jon Brusven 335 Burntside Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 Ph: 763.208.6633 DATE: June 30, 2003 RE: Variance to replace existing deck I am attempting to replace an existing deck, which was rotted and dangerous. However, apparently the front comer of my garage is approximately 1 foot into the set-back. The proposed deck is no closer to any lot line than 18.7 feet according to the surveyors. Thank you. City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application ....,., "0 ........ "m_, ... .",. ,. . ___ .,,_. "0 .. 'm ..........,. _,_ ... . .. Amount Received 1. Street address of property involved in this application: '"'3 ~ S Bu..l'~.\- ~\d..~ Dt,v.e.. 2. Applicant: ~c>V\E. 'B'l'us.oJ.e..V\ Name hr~vA... b l "l- :1 '+6. t:> Ss , Business Phone -, b3. "2-t)'. Cc.b 3~ Home Phone ColL...l.~O'b~O Cell Phone Email Address . Detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. Rt. f\<\<!.' "J <U<- \ ~,h j--d". k . Lm-'k", <\~ d.. "'J ..r(>L(~') . OV\.blc:k of +M- ~bu..tJt 4. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. 1 also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request,. if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. c ~.... Signatu~ . . ant 5. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: . ~ b ",t:::. l?,r \"\'s".c:... '" Print Name of owner .~gnatur~ ---- Variance Application Submittal: The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete .Plication.lf an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: t./.. Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. L A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey requirements. ~ brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation of a "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. Variance application fee, as follows: ~ single family residential; $150 -other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all Arrounding property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly 'ross the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project(we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told them about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and not found them at home, you may simplywrjte something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not.home" and then write their addr6ss. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be receiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form,you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other ;;~:~;ere;!l:;;;;J~_ Comment Signature Address 3 3\ ~"'f,*s(d~ t).r,'f\SL/ PrinlName ~\A~ ~.~ omment \~\l\JL nt) ~ o/~ ~ r Si!Jnalure tfL,(l..,. ~ Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name .omment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature eint Name Comment Signature :ru 1) J T}./ J) up fl.€ h.~ ~~ Address~2.lo.~rf\~ ~~. Address ~U.V'v\'-rSI ~ Jk.. Address 4515 C~C\t-&t~ uH,A~ Address 4{,().~(!Hltr6 L.A/~ r 'U." Address Address Address . . . 6 33S~U~1A+~1de Dnvz Street Address "HOLD HARMLESS' I, ,~t VI '5V'lA Nt<...lI\' , am requesting the City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) '.e. Ctt.i .e..'I(\ )~I n' onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is n nconforming d that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am dOing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. c Jl) V\.b Yu.. ~ VtZ.V1 Print Name --. .....-........-.... ~ Signqt~ ..- ,)~ ~ '26 '2-00 '2> \ Date ~ /" , /'}'\^ VU.j~ C/.City'of Golden Valley Staff Signature I ! j;:\ ~l J. ...... I ! . IJI' 1.0 (,l ()ft.. . ~'(CVc!('- G7f'1. v_y /', rj ,.' . IJr .~. / ' () jj:"'->i..{J"Cr! (; " h ,:' 11f1ifj c . . ., " " . 332.5 Kyle Ave. N. Pa.t & Dave Nesbitt . 03-07-38 . , . . . Planning 763.S93.S09S/763.S93.S109(fax) Date: July 17, 2003 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Subject: 3325 Kyle Ave. N. (03.07.38) Pat and Dave Nesbitt Pat and Dave Nesbitt own the house at 3325 Kyle Ave. N. (The property is located.in the far northeast corner of Golden Valley south of 34th Ave. N.) The applicant is requesting variances from two requirements of the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21) in order to allow for the construction of an addition. The applicant came to the Inspections Department in order to begin the building permit process. Since there was no current survey available, the applicant was required to submit a survey showing the location of all buildings on the property. The survey indicates that the existing house does not meet front and side setback requirements. The proposed addition (expansion of the breezeway area between the garage and house) meets all building setback requirements except that the breezeway addition will have the same front setback as the house. City staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" agreement form in order to receive a building permit for the construction prior to the issuance of the variances to make the house legally nonconforming. The City staff agreed to the "Hold Harmless" agreement only after the applicant submitted the required survey and application materials. The signed "Hold Harmless" agreernehlTsattached. . The following are the requested variances: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code requires that the front yard setback shall be 35 ft. The variance request is for 0.9 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 34.1 ft. at its closest point to the front property line along Kyle Ave. for the existing house and portion of the addition along the front of the house. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) Side Yard Setback. City Code requires that the side yard setback shall be 15 ft. The variance request is for 1.1 ft. off the required 1.5 ft. to a distance of 13.9 ft. at its closet point to the north side property line for the existing house. The City's file on this address indicates that the house was built in 1948. It appears that the footprint of the building has not been increased. There have been no other variances granted to this address. . . IIJW' LU UOIIJ __. __.- 030213 7/29/24 NESBIIT, DA VID ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 s. Hwy. No. 101 Minnelonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 4747964 Fax (952) 4748267 SURVEY FOR: DA VID NESBITT SUR VEYED: April, 2003 DRAFTED: April 7,2003 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7 and the North Half of Lot 8, Block 4, Noble Grove, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The Scope of our services does EQ! include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent .legal .counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such a'i easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. . 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important. 3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the corners of the property. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: ". " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, unless otherwise noted. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ~In\gA Ji Qrt~!l" am H. Park", P.E & P.S. No 9235 l.t.J, :: , ~~ .;" 'f ~<:::) :--'C\J ~i <' I , \ r~ PInch 7i '-- GRAPHIC SCALE ~ . ~ ~-."f= ( IN FEET ) f I 40 i .- .. .. I I J -- - I , , ! \ l I ~ l<' ~ \ ~. . . \ \..~ S 89"08'27" W 141.11 CantHever ~ \.. (, ,) ~._._-- . South line of the North Half of Lof 8 --148.38-- S 89.08'34" W )... \.. (, ,) ;\ ~ .... " ._A ffi !ro "1'_ ,0 ~a ItJ ' ~ ~ b I'"'J )"' --) ~ ~ I , I --' Drw. No. 030213 . . I City,of Golden Valley Board Qf Zoning Appeals (BZA) Zoning Code Variance Application For Office Use Only: Application No. Date Received., .' '11 (P-z.;1 ~4 ~ BZA Meeting Date 7. .... Amount Received 'So 1. 2. Business Phone J _ Go~.tA/~ ~~~. ,~ JIM 591LL , '. City/State/Zip J{ J- \" ;}-9- 5-; tf l- Home Phone Cell Phone Address 3. If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: . .. __ Pa:::e: 1/7 _ / ~ J-. . 014 V€ f ;Ja.f AJet;13J 1 T r ~ Print Name of owner Signature of owner . To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and corre'" .9lso lJm,Cierstand that unless construction ofthe action applicable to this variance request, if ed, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. Variance Application Submittal: 'The following information must be submitted by the application deadline to make a complete application. If an application is incomplete, it will not be accepted: ~ Completed application form, including signatures of surrounding property owners. ./ A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. See the handout on survey j requirements. A brief statement of the reasons, necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this variance (see Frequently Asked Questions for an explanation ota "hardship"). Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. ~ You may submit detailed description of building(s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this project. The site plans and drawings submitted with this application will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit is issued. _xL'/variance application fee, as follows: @ single family residential; $150 - other Signatures of Surrounding Property Owners Note to the variance applicant: As part of the variance application process, you will need to attempt to obtain the signatures of all surrounding property. owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. To obtain these signatures, you will need to personally visit each of these property owners, tell them about your project (we encourage you to bring along a copy of your building plans) and have them sign the area, below. The signature is meant only to verify that you have told thern about your project and gives them opportunity to comment. ' If you have attempted to contact a property owner on two separate occasions and noifound them at home, you may simply write something to the effect "made two attempts, owner not home" and then write their address. City staff will also send a written notice informing these property owners of the time and place of the BZA meeting. Note to surrounding property owners: This is an application by your neighbor for a variance from the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of .y possible effect the granting of this variance could have on your property. You will also be ~ceiving a written notice informing you of the time and place of the variance meeting. By signing this form, you are only verifying that you have been told about the project, not that you necessarily agree or object to the project. If you wish, you may comment on the project. Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project. Print Name C:olYlqb. .2 Vl~'Jy),t> Y1 'Comment Signature Address 351-& /~/& Print Name il1~HAe~ R:J~ y Comment .nature ~bl2b Address _f1lo K y k f1.e Print Name ,. omment di~. .u .<('( . Lf)tC ,2;6 /7 )jIb Ave- IV I 6 t/ Address55( 7 4~ -r4-~ Signature)j('Jytt~ Print Name J'hA!e/ ~ri-1- ~~ V\~JU~ Comment Signature Print Name Comment . Signature Address j 'jL,/ 4- k. ,.J 0V DtLv~ - /V"f . A-cI tl / I a..h Ie .~-;r5-o~ &-2(,-05 '. Address Print Name GA/ICl_~ ker Comment ,I 33;)1 K~ (c<?_ , AI Of f!-{/uJ.fa hj fJ , -.23-0 3 (;, ~ ~G ~ 0'3 Signature Address 33 LO L-e.:e. Print Name Comment .nature Address . . . JUN 2" 2003 .... "''1 ~..__ / ,/ --, C" .- "." L "- <...==)1""'",'" .' __.-,"3 ('11e_ (J, \~f \0, & Street Address "HOLD HARMLESS' ~-'') " ";J.t t~es bjt-t I am requesting t/:1e City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) l~ C>\::,('"' Ac~a It' en . ' , onto my house. 'understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time' submit this "Hold Harmless"letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what , am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. R?\~ N f sb; tr PrirlEl1ame ..,,' . ~d-l.t)~ Signature (0 Z?> 0,3:. Date /) . (~,;;/':":, ,': \r~J '1+--- cCity of Golden Valley Staff Signature r . '....h:::,(?_ ('-kt,('\:. ,y,<,,:,:> _ ...cL ,r ":If r, J0t"J,t:>f~f;n"'';>I'\I:' I.)', i2e( bJ~ c";,,, r' (oJ. r\ IJ ,. LJ ; A(-C--ti- -:-J. . iLJ,,: ,r'rv-., " f\. , .) -.' C ' r c (I.t-'f' \ t........\ I" f' 1..__4