The URL can be used to link to this page

03-26-02 BZA Agenda . Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - February 26, 2002 II. The Petitions are: 3301 Major Avenue North (Map 3) (02-3-9) Dale and Elizabeth Kisling, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 5.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.4 feet for the existing home's front entryway at its closest point to the front yard property line along Major Avenue North. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings . . .8 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 9.2 feet for the existing detached garage at its closest point to the existing home. . 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet for the existing detached garage at its closest point to the front yard property line along Adell Avenue. Purpose: To bring the existing detached garage into conformance with accessory buildirlg requirements. 4840 Westbend Road (Map 5) (02-3-10) David and Michele Rausch, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 5.8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.2 feet for the proposed front entryway at its closest point to the front yard property line along Westbend Road. . .8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.2 feet for the existing home and for the proposed second story addition at its closest poinUo the front yard property line along Westbend Road. . Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a front entryway and second story addition to the existing home. . . . 2237 Noble Avenue North (Map 5) (02-3-11) David Osberg, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks . 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the north side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. 2017 Independence Avenue North (Map 19) (02-3-12) Terrance Avery, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section .11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 27.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 7.6 feet for the proposed home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Duluth Street. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home on a vacant lot. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (3) Side Yard Setbacks . .68 feet off the required 13.38 feet to a distance of 12.7 feet for the proposed home at its closest point to the south side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home on a vacant lot. 2700 Regent Avenue North (Map 4) (02-3-13) Evergreen Remodeling, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks . 5.6 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7.9 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the south side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. 2 . 1525 Jersey Avenue North (Map 15) (02-3-14) Paul and Judith Carns, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Jersey Avenue North. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks . 7.45 feet off the required 12.25 feet to a distance of 4.8 feet for the proposed room addition at its closest point to the south side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a room addition to the existing home. 2004 Hillsboro Avenue North (Map 19) (02-3-15) Roy Smith, Applicant . Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 2.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32.5 feet for the proposed garage at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Avenue North. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks . 6.5 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the north side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment . 3 .. . . .. . Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals February 26, 2002 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, February 26,2002, in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair McCracken-Hunt called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Those present were members Cera, McCracken-Hunt, Sell, S Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were Sta Recording Secretary Lisa Wittman. I. Approval of Minutes - January 22, 2002 MOVED by Smith, seconded by Sell and motion minutes from January 22, 2002 as submitted. imously to approve the II. The Petitions are: Request: .on 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback ff the required 35 feet toa distance of 29.2 feet for the ome at its closest point to the front yard property line east side of Westwood Drive South. .4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20.6 feetfor existing home at its closest point to the front yard property e along the north side of Westwood Drive South. o bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (e) (1) Side Yard Setbacks . .4 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.6 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the south side yard property line. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback requirements. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals February 26, 2002 Page 2 . Olson stated that the applicant would like to build an addition onto the existing home and that during the construction planning process it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. He stated that the applicant has signed a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit to go ahead with the remodeling project. Smith asked if the proposed addition conforms to setback require that it does. McCracken-Hunt stated that the request seemed to be an atter. MOVED by Sell, seconded by Cera and motion carried following variance requests: . · 5.8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distan closest point to the front yard property lin South. · 14.4 feet off the required 35 feet to its closest point to the front yard p Drive South. · .4 feet off the required 15 fe closest point to the south si or the existing home at its east side of Westwood Drive .6 feet for the existing home at long the north side of Westwood e of 14.6 feet for the existing home at its roperty line. ap 23) (02-2-7) rd Gunderson A licants Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1)Side Yard Setbacks feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 6.5 feet for the roposed garage at its closest point to the south side yard property line. To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. Olson stated that the applicants are proposing to build a garage addition onto the existing home, which would require a variance. He stated that this property received variances in October .of 1999 for a similar project but that the construction of that garage addition has never taken place and the variance approvals granted in 1999 expired in October 2000. . Smith asked what the difference is between the variance approved in 1999 and the one being requested now. Olson stated that this proposal is 2 Y2 feet closer to the property line than the request in 1999 was. McCracken-Hunt asked if the proposed garage is 2 '" Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals February 26, 2002 Page 3 . going to be wider than what was requested in 1999. Olson stated that it would be two feet wider than what was approved in 1999. McCracken-Hunt stated that this proposal seems to be in line with other variances that the Board has been granting. Cera asked the applicants if they had spoken to the neighbors to the. south since they would be the most affected by the garage addition. Richard Gunderson, applicant, stated that during the process of filling out the variance request ap . tion the neighbors to the south were just moving in, but that they have s em since then and they are amenable to it. MOVED by Sell, seconded by Smith and mot" request for 8.5 feet off the required 15 feet to garage at its closest point to the south me this st for a 22-foot erned about how Shaffer stated that he was concerned about how close t proposed addition would be. He stated he understands wide garage isn't out of line, but he wanted it noted that close to the property line the garage will be. unanimously to approve the of 6.5 feet for the proposed rty line. . 2205 Mary Hills Drive (Ma Kathleen Schaaf and Er. Request: .on 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the deck addition at its closest point to the front yard line along Bassett Creek Drive. w for the construction of a deck addition to the existing e. the applicants would like to replace the existing deck on their home i d shape. He stated that the original deck was constructed by a r without a variance or a building permit. Shaffer asked if the applicants are proposing that the new deck would be the same size as the existing deck. Kathleen Schaff, applicant, stated that the deck would be the exact same size and that they want to replace it because it is rotting. . McCracken-Hunt stated that it is bothersome to her that just because someone in the past didn't get a variance or a building permit for the original deck that the Board should grant a variance for it now. 3 . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals February 26, 2002 Page 4 Shaffer agreed with McCracken-Hunt and stated that he doesn't like the idea of awarding a variance to someone because of someone else's mistake either, but in this case the deck has been there for years and there has been no complaints about it. He stated that he would not approve a request like this if it were new construction. Smith stated that there is also a hardship in this case with the steep terrain on the lot and that if the Board didn't approve this request it would leave the e with the existing sliding glass doors up on the second floor with no deck. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried request for 15 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance 0 deck addition at its closest point to the front yard prope Drive. approve the e proposed assett Creek III. Other Business There was no other business discussed. IV. Adjournment . The meeting was adjourned at 7' . 4 - J - . 3301 Major Avenue North 02-3-9 . Dale and Elizabeth Kisling . . . " " Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 3301 Major Avenue North (Map 3) (02-3-9) Dale and Elizabeth Kisling, Applicants Date: March 20, 2002 Dale and Elizabeth Kisling, with property located at 3301 Major Avenue North, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a room addition to the existing home. This addition conforms to the building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home and detached garage do not meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicants to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless form is attached. . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home's front entryway is for 5.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.4 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Major Avenue North. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the detached garage shall be located at least 35 feet from a lot line which is also a street line and at least 10 feet from the home. The property owner is requesting a variance for the detached garage for this requirement. The variance requested is for 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet at its closet point to the front property Jines along Adell Avenue and for .8 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 9.2 feet between the detached garage and the existing home. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in November of 1951 for the . construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 3301 Major Avenue N Dale and Elizabeth Kisling, Applicants ~ Nr ~ 1 ..-::.iJ J__L~.." ... . T"'":: . . ~ R'z~~l ~ ~ ~ . ~.. ._~ fi ~ ~ 0\ . ~ '" ~ .:..~ :;:.~ ., fI) r- ~ Il) ..... . ....... ~ . :;~019 ~ ; 11);;) If) ..- _2~-J.5 _ ~~'" ..... ~ 10 ;::, 018' Il) >- ~ !:: <.J 017 4. . o 9 ]{o.4 >- !::. (..) 1100 10 19 5~, II ~ ~ .... ...; ~.. liZZ ~ ! :;:.,............. '" 18 4 '" ..... ~~.2.2 ---, 6..e. 'dIlL__ \<-. - ~ ~ ~ 2.1 . "" ~~ Cl ~ 4 ~ )4 '--"-2bZ$.34- . . . . . (Revised 1/9~) Petition Number IJ). - 3 - 9 Date Received d J), I t) 2~ , . Amount Received 5"0,00 ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 330 , /hat' ~ ftv-l- Norfl..) {-.crl~ v~ '~ 2. BZA Petition Date rn CV'rc.J-,. Z-G:,. ,;200 ~ , 3. Petnioner: n ""-/ e. CUY\ d. C u Za.A.e.'iL kl5 6.,.... q Name . U -=? :3 0 I f'nCLf Srr A V~ No rt-h C~dl!/rt.~ Address v City/State/Zip mtv S-~~ &/ d . .34 <?'d J75"7~ 3, S-~? - c? 791 Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): ,(0 f /0; 6locl: 10) I"'ohle - {-rrove.. 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: ~. Single Family. _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling .~ Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. Vo....r.,O/Y'CL ~~,u~~.1J ~l~':j. 5vIbo.Jc. ~. b 35~ ~s... ;.., ,a.&J-b=-*-- :!:.?:"r~ Ltk LA. Y\.t. Pu.. tf,' n a.oL~i-; ~ ~ b~c.k.. of ~~. l'"hAo;:. va.-t"ianu. UJ .fv .e-K.l~h' ~ C+r"f:j~, 8. {Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity .or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or .other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota~ The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ SO. - representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~~~~~~. Sigflature ~PPlicant . . .~ UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their. views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. . . (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name Sh.(,\L~ -n....o~o~ . ~ ~~(- Comment ~ ~ ~.J\ 0.-.... Signature ~ Address ~(O ~Clve--1Ik G. lJ. ~::;= !f!)~ tt::~<)~f~d qt/;tkmv f-IJ ~ /lIl1ik~v Signature ~ ~/L,JI ~QQress ~ Mr Itu. b .l~ (J 11\ Print Name . G 1'-"j. H-e< A!J e Comment Signature ~s;. iM 4'~ () 0 Address 330 1 I'1t 'Li ~ Ii ~ ,..J Print Name Comment Signature Address . . .330 ( /h~ -- ;4-v~ I~r-IA Street Address . ,Co r /0,. B loc-k... JO, NobJe- &rove "HOLD HARMLESS' I, ~ J<ts 1,""0. am requ~sting the City, of Golden Valley to allow to proceed with a{n) FJ/"e:/.4n~Q.. ~V~ onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmlessft letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans... I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what lam doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. . Sc.;.~~ft... ~ fbAe I:.<s itA r Print Name .~~. Signatu . . a: ~~. 2. , /.?aoz-' Date \)o~~ City of Golden Valley Staff Signature . I ! ~1 Eslablished in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 'l3rd Avenue North 612-660-3093 FlU No. 560-3522 ELIZABETH SYLTE & DALE KIslING -- ~ MilU1eapolis. )finne.ot.. 55426 ~ur\1 ry ars mrr! if indr li~"''''t.. e i 'I 1-(;l ,-........---,----~v 0.; l -ZC;.OO () 1~ ~I.~ ~ t Q ~ .~ ~ ~("OL-_, --- ~. - +, I 1 1.4 .. /d." ., ,- J 'Z-j-' f"''''r''~''' t ~ A"'Pl-r'Do-l ~ ,.~ III 'I ~. ... '! . t :~ 'l' .\ :.,-r: 1.\ , ~ 'r:: 1...,: :z o 'ti j ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~I Cl ~I I j.: ! I { ~:I'/ bi' ~/, I ./'1 ~:/I' : I " .... '-..._~-- lOC:>,OO ----- ;f- #') I __._.L_.._... ... ....-.._.;._-_.,_._.-'~.. ,/// / The- .o'nly eose:.ne~ts -shown ore from plots of record or information provloed by cuen\." -.. .""0- ~'.~'" We hereby certify tnot this is 0 true cnd correct representation of a survey af the boundaries of the obove described land and the location of 011 buildings and visible encroachments. if any. from or on' said land. ,3rd Au ust . 1 ' . Surveyed by us thIS _ day of 9 200_ . ....rD"'.E. :-----------.h7"f A . L L...__. _ J+.Y _~__.. . . INVOICE NO. 60375 F .B.NO. 891-58 SCALE: 1" = ZO' ~ '\ ! o Denotes Iron Monument ::l Denotes Wood I-+.Jb Set for excavation only xooo.O Denotes Existing Elevation @ Denotes Propoeed Elevation ~ Denote, Strfoce Drainage NOTE: Proposed groQeS ore subject to r~s of sea tests. Proposed buik1in9 informalion must be checked with approved building plan O1d development or grading plan before excavation and conetruction. _Proposed Top of Block <:: -----'- Propo~ _9!r.~ge. F100r _Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building ~ \) ~ Ul >i """t! ~,o ,C{ a "7 <t 2: d-'I..., , JI. l ~ \' . " " Cot 10. Block 10. NOBLE-GROVE / / JlM4GJL OIorles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No.21753 or Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 . . . . . www.dgoUm_vll~ Y 3-12-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 3301 Major Avenue North Dale and Elizabeth Kislina. Applicants Dale and Elizabeth Kisling, with property located at 3301 Major Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct an addition onto the existing home. This addition meets all applicable building setback requirements. However, as a result of this construction, it was discovered that the existing home and detached garage do not meet current setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home's front entryway is for 5.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.4 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Major Avenue North. . Section 11.21, Subd.12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the detached garage shall be located at least 35 feet from a lot line which is also a street line and at least 10 feet from the home. The property owner is requesting a variance for the detached garage for this requirement. The variance requested is for 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet at its closet point to the front property lines along Adell Avenue and for .8 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 9.2 feet between the detached garage and the existing home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, March 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. I ,. '. . . . 4840 Westbend Road 02-3-10 David and Michele Rausch .! . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 4840 Westbend Road (Map 5) (02-3-10) David and Michele Rausch, Applicants Date: March 20, 2002 David and Michele Rausch, with property located at 4840 Westbend Road, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build several additions to the existing home. The proposed rear addition meets building setback requirements. However, the existing home, the front entryway addition and the second story addition do not meet setback requirements. The following are the variances requested: . The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed front entryway is for 5.8 foot off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.2 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Westbend Road and for .8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.2 feet to the front yard property line along Westbend Road for the existing home and proposed second story addition. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in December of 1953 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 4840 Westbend Road David and Michele Rausch, Applicants Z4Z. .~~~ .... ~~:;i.~~w~. 16 . 155.. . . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number ();) -:3 ~ J 0 Date Received a-/-:J-. 7 / D 'A , , Amount Received t;" D. (j) ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property.involved in this petition: 4- \S '-\ 0 W ~f€t-J.t> \20 ~t> 2. BZA.Petition Date 3. cv \\\,~ ~~ ~ V<u~ I h~ 6S4~ City/State/Zip J~3 -5"S'b-SoB=b Home Phone 0#)1...... rhQ;lC ':7 &3 - lfo'f -h56~ (Df. /;.Gf) If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: rJ/Pt Petitioner: \)f<J1 ~ Name 4<g40 Wcu.~D U Add ress -, (Q "b - 'h -g' -'-\oSd3 LtL~-~l3 -<':'1'\+ eM.) Business Phone 4. 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): O<:Jl1eJ \ N ~:-n-e~'16Y\ II 1;UJtl skp 2_(\ R~~- ~-4 \ It'l\l\ ~) M N 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: ~single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waive'r. Attach le~er, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the prc;>perty must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota." The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 9] .00 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name Comment ((Iv /) (1 vJ .~~~ t? J,m?; ~ ...JtJvj I 7"1LIJ/tn ,r _ tJ~~ //Yn.n.r<'?./.4/d/..:2 . ~ j --- f 4'-- CJ.? ~ rt1 Cl~- 0';?'1.-'(, I) I.LI//~h?" Address f{P//~~li'7;/~-1/ . ??L. . ~v, -/ 'a LJ-J Signature Print Name . !lv'tLL..IAM E=3. -f-tc-? VE Y Comment ,f A:rp<Ra>\/E; Signature t/r/db (lkUi CZ'}1m:ftJddress . :2/10 -?~ Aw: .N, Print Name Comment t-iou: On corner of LJe~J~nd Rd t o,cAl.U.A Jio\Y~ UuCClil+ Signature Address Print Name-d'lxl \\.~ ~ DPJPK.. UbJui! w t' ) Comment liJ()~1 i)~ ~ l ~ ~I ~I ~/ I'-! t, r f. i f &1 tJ 111 M P tUl\! ~ I , Signature~__)n-j.jJ~hji Address 49>~') uJ9.s'fl")fUO ~. )Z;;~~ v' c7' . . David & Michele Rausch Request for Variance at 4840 Westbend Road We are requesting a variance for the addition of S feet by 9 feet covered entryway on the south side of our home, at a new proposed front door. In terms of space, we are requesting as.8' variance to 29.2' setback from Westbend Road, instead of 35'. The request does not include any new livable space. We are planning to expand our home to accommodate our growing and aging family. The variance request involves a change in the entrance of our home. Our current entrance is in the southeast comer of our home - facing east and tucked behind a half-wall (See Photo 1). These are some reasons for making our request: Safety . Our elderly parents/grandparent, an older Sibling and other in-laws have difficulty with the distance from the driveway to the front door. To enter our home, they must go up 8 stairs, then follow a 30 foot stone and grass path slightly uphill to the southeast comer of our home, then step up toa covered entrance area and head west 8 feet before stepping into our front door. We would like to minimize the distance and create a safer means of going up/downhill. . We are expecting our first child inJune and we would like to minimize any difficulty we may have in carrying a baby into and out of the house. . The existing entrance feels unsafe, because there is a half-wall where burglars can hide without being seen from the street. We would like to have our entrance more visible. Visibility . The entrance cannot be seen from the street, making it difficult for people to find our home. Again, we would like to have our entrance more visible. Functionality . By moving the entrance, we are able to use the existing entrance space for our family/living room without expanding the footprint of our home. We envision the proposed familyjliving room area as a play area for our infant, which will be very visible to us from the kitchen and familyjliving room. . The current entryway is structurally very Slllall and does not allow for more than one person in the entryway at a time or the coat closet door to be open when guests are arrivinglleaving. Our proposed entryway would allow more room for our guests. In investigating expansion options, we were made aware that the only area where we could expand house footprint without a variance is east. As you can see in Photo 1, an eastern entrance is farther away from our driveway than our existing entrance. Our home faces south, so we would like to have a southern entrance. Our other alternative is to incorporate the new entrance into our existing footprint, which would mean thai we would lose family room/living room area and according to our architect, cause problems in exposing pmi of our low(_~r level lo wal(~r ;.md oi.her wcai.h(~r conditions. \V(~ would have llKTcascd wai.erproofing and inslIlalioJl isslles in Ihis oplion, t:()Inhiflecl wilh less an:hiiedHml appeaL 0., ., f ,..,. f . , ... 1 , 1...1 ... '} '_ vel' IHe penon 0 IWO yeaJ"S, we nave Hlveshg;-1It':(J ophons 0 expaflsH)JJ ;-11111 we leel we n;we 110110,111111 y choSt':1I lIlt': opiioll ihai '"t':(lllin:~s ihe leasl ;nllOIlIlI of v;n;am:r. am} CTeaies gl"t':alt':J' an:hiit':duml appe-tt vVe wOIf},1 aplll"t':ciak yom' cOlIsi,lt':J..diou iu gJ'allliug om' vaJ;allct': J"t':'l"esi. VVt': IImlen;laml ihat SOlUt': of OIl1" lIt':ighhOl'S have het':1I glall\t"AI variaJlct':s fOl' oiht':I' 1'1II'i'OSt':S (g;uag"t':S, ell:.) amI W~ are hop~ful of the !\alllt': ouln>Jlle. Thank yon if)r your consideration. Sincerely, . David & Michele Rausch E -lot/Cert/W8-5inv61648 . . Esla blished in ~~62 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS INVOICE NO. 61648 F.B.NO. 913-56 SCALE: 1" = 30' REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 Denotes Iron Monument 7601 73rd Avenue Norlh (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 Minneapolis. Minnesola 55428 xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevotion g,urut>yors (!!t>difirafl' JIM CRAOIT Property located in Section 18. Township 29. Range 24. Hennepin County. "Innesota :>-.t .~ & Q, ~ ,fj :::.. -o::r: 869'8~ no"" 870.3 :e, ,'. !Cli. . jf ~ i l/).> I ~.! ~9.9 ; . .....:c.>.i,_. . I J:Jf1M /' iJ.' 1:;, .::) 1/'1. 865.4~ HOUSE 865. 6;~5..3 _._.-w_ 141.0 '-~-w-'-'-'-.overliiOdwrr'e*"' 85616 cone. cur 8611f6 WESTBEND ROAD hydront W 'nh-866. 96 Benchmark: Top nul of hydrant al SW quadranl of Ordway and ll'estbend Road Elevallon = 886.98 feel Lot 8, Block 5, WEST URBAN . The only easements shown are from plats of record or Informalion provided by client. We hereby cerlify lhal lhls is a lrue and correcl representallon of a survey of lhe boundaries of lhe above described land and lhe localion of all buildillgs and visible encroachmenls. If any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us lhis 12th day of .December 20..lU.- _OM ~ OiL Charles F. AndersQn. Minn. Reg. No.21753 or Gregory R. Prasch. Mlnn Reg No. 24992 . . . . . . -<1 .~ o & - ~ z S " i ~ l -=~::~~~l1.I.-c.~. :~-~w. - .- . - -~~""'~"" :z.~ ~9"ln::~::;ll)"::;.o,::$t'f~:~~ ,.,.. f.!.:l {~ Ai a ~:Ii J~; -I,:: .......... Ii.. ~ ~ ~l! r- r-j ~ n i~ :iJ ...1..... ,.,: . . . ,. 1 I' r.. . " \ , \1 ._.'l-'-~-------_. . ,N .~ \. j -- -.- d! . 'l , I II ..\ ...;,.>.- \, \ ~- ..... . ..O';itfr'" . _C'/ . ~ . ';,;-' . ~. T '~~..r . ".,.: ''ll . 11: "l',f. . 1.oJ. " ; 'd" / -I' ......; ~ _".d ....f' 1'1'.' .,:, ...- : # I;," I .~ .1 t _.1. :Iii.' '.--~...-..,.,,'ow. . :+! ..-=---rQH.:,,,,,;,t;_..:,, . . t ~ /.Jt'/kP .,(>;"Z3 .- "~-,,,--,,--'~-,.. ',.-.~-,; .: . Ii . 3 1. OC'. '6.; f i.l-:f 'i.~;'J, ...........1.l....!..;.......... i' f ".~ ,\J..:" . :." '. t. f{,t I"~' t. .' ','" .., "." ... '\f:'."" >~~,,;,jl \1: .',It . jllJ' :.l:f. .!...~..:.....l....,. :f.:. ",", :, ;;" '1' . .' '.' "j .... . ot';i":'o/ .~.....,,,t:.:.... ' .'.f' ; ~ .' . . . "~ at! .' ",' '.I ~ >>v- .':.:,~ l :j. ~~. "..,. .~ ~ .tIUJl'i1 o ., O;~J ~ . ~o~:.-..,t!;f;;l . .. 1 / ! ~'- . .:. ij f; 11 .1 , j .l, ;j il.' _ it'.'. - ;-- - " ;1 :( !II.I! ..~ .!i- ft i!! .. ~: -.....-,.. I I I I .j....-- J:~ ~i ~.'''...' .~~: ,.' 'j i i II , . u....~.,..,..,.,.:.:".,,_ '*:1 "~/.u~; 4 t;J:i Q . . . . ~ 4 .I ..!.. 0 o ~ 1 t ~.t!~.~ . . \ ~. ~W.7 ."";-'"1 ~ I " 0;-01 ! .., I; .,,; 'J- , -~ -4 ~" .1 ... i I '~ ! "- ~q l'- . .q Sq ~. -f' .~ \:. ~ ..~ :" I I -l-. I ..,...-1 www.ci.~Um.vlt~ Y 3-13-02 **** REVISED **** HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 4840 Westbend Road David and Michele Rausch. Applicants David and Michele Rausch, with property located at 4840 Westbend Road, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct an entryway addition onto the front of the existing home, as well as adding a second story to the home. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed front entryway is for 5.8 foot off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.2 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Westbend Road and for .8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.2 feet to the front yard property line along Westbend Road for the existing home and proposed second story addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, March 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. . . 2237 Noble Avenue North 02-3-11 . David Osberg . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2237 Noble Avenue North (Map 5) (02-3-11) David Osberg, Applicant Date: March 20, 2002 David Osberg, with property located at 2237 Noble Avenue North, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a garage addition to the existing home. This construction project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. . · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width over 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. . The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in August of 1956 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 2237 Noble Avenue N David Osberg, Applicant . "" 4740 4700 EA T ..: ... !~.14 ,j '" > It i:~?s.; r.O'SI.J'0 4235.2: . 5.-2 . . I 'nl'. "'-''"1'-c:..t:Jt:Jc. J..~....)O ~!IY Ur uULUcN VHLLcY 5938109 P.04/06 (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0 ). - 3 -II Date Received ~ I ; / D '1 . Amount Received SO. OJ) ($50 . residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: /, ,j --;: .--; 1\' , fA.it::::. -) / ! )() i'Ur/ rJ 2. 3. A-~ Y\.) 6-cJIJcJII Vulle,! :"f ~ City/State/Zip .. . . . G?;ti:J.-'2. I~ 3 - 5 <?"i)-~~5 Home Phone . 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: . fY\'{ w;fe- ClV\!2 1- Q,r<:..- th~ (Ji'Dpe:v"t-y OWlle[S 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): -.LoT .~ Blo6tL ~l VJG6t U Y-[)Q y\ 6. Type of property "Olved in this petition: Residential: .J! Single Famiiy _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . . I' IHt'(-Uq - .:::UU.::: 1':::: -5b CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 5938109 P.05/06 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may b,eapproved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. Jh e.. QRdl'~i()Y1 o-f GL :.L 5 tQ Ii 0--tJLV'C1ZJ! e--- 8. (Staff will complete this item) n e.. u.J alfL{ 6h -eN Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the r@.asons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for tfl~ granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs. or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey ot the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The surv~y: must be prepared by a regi!$- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must sl)ow all property lines. buildings, and stre~ts. The distance from the house and ill! other bt.dlcjings to the front and side property linel ~hall be shown. The rear distance c)f any build;ngs from the property line will bft needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show ~n apllloximate location of illl)! J2yildings on adj~k1~nt properties relative to the side(s) wbere the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies elf the survey for use by tlJ~ aQal:d.a 11 . To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ b'r::::J. representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~fft12oe'(JZ( UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . . MRR-04-2002 12:36 CITY OF GOLDEN VRLLEY 5938109 P.06/06 The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT eBOPERTY OWNE~: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any Possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name 6I+R~{ NrrJ</tfJ Comment Q t ~. Signature ~ iJ'/P- Address 222-J )}J,le Nbl/l PrintName Na..nc y A-ZZCL/V) ,\- ))~ 1-,6, f1"L.~ Comment () I k ' Signature ~ C-- ~~ Address {!rJ#w/9- V J300 f\J O~/Jc-e- AT Print Name A/II-Ale/ O,/(, Comment Signature {)&4(<~ ~ ~ Address ;;).;;l Cf3 ~ av ~ Print Name Comment Signature Address TOTRL P.06 ~1.,1 -~ .: I ~" -.i .,' lJ'! ,:. (51 :;., ....' I:. .:: I. ,:' - v .:' --......-- ," 1,." .:: \ ...., , :. \ ..ti.: I t" I .. Esta bUshed in 1962 LOT SUlrVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fu No. 560-3522 1-S-Fr #2243 ltinneapolil, ltinnelotl 55426 g,Uf'\fegars <!Ierttfirate '1.(" _F_ 11,,1. 5 ~EAf,. 166.67 PI.A1" ,I ~ Existing '2.0 Residence\/> Uo. '2.1.;1 ~ .R 125.00 The only easements shawn are from plats of record or information pravidld by cfient. , We hereby certify that thil II a true and carrect representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of aI bundings and visible encroochments. if any. from or on ~~~~J' by UI thi. 14th day of Februarv ?0...Qg,. Rev ~ Drawn By 5. .u.......... ,ne Name wu3-4fb91618inv62011.S90 ... .' tont. ~ . D riv -;. way: . ;.. .." . .' , I" I':' .. 'j .,' . . .. L ..... / -<r ..&1 -I #2223 1-S-Fr 4J.5 ---...... %4 ~ ..t:" t., ....II .: " "'1': .t. . ':. ;.~;; I" .1 .: o I~ .... o .',&. . <;)'1 o h. ~ :~:;.. ~Ii' .' !t '. ~~.. : I ~ .. f I I J ':, .... ,.'~. :j:.~ ~, 1:. ..o' -.il ':. ,:' ':, ~" ..:: .q -t...l s... ~ Il.l :::l c: Il.l ~ ~ 62011 916-18 - 20' INVOICE F.B.NO. SCALE: 1" o Denotes Iran Monument [J Denotes Wood Hub Set far excovotion only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevotion 8 Denotes Proposed Elevotion __ Denotes Surface Drainoge NOTE: Proposed grades ore subject to results of sail tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or groding pian before excavation and construction. _ Proposed Top of Block _ Proposed Garoge ,loor _Proposed Lowest ,loar Type of Building Property located in Section 18. Township 29. Range 24. Hennepin County, Minnesota Il.l """l ..Q ~ Cot 3, 8lock 4. WESTUR8AN ....(!w1(VL-- Charles F, Anderson, Minn. Reg, No.21753 or Gregory R. Prosch; Minn. Reg. No, 24992 . Memo Date: 3/5/02 Oan Olson, Go~lanning Board David oSberg~ Hardship Explaination for Variance Applicaiton To: From: RE: I'm applying for a variance to add another garage stall to my home. Currently, my home is a single tuck-under garage. My claim of hardship is based on three factors: 1. Lack of vehicle and personal property storage accommodations. 2. Significant reduction in resale value because of a single car garage. . 3. Lack of storage for boating or other recreational equipment. I will attend the Board meeting on 3/26/02 to answer any questions you or the board may have. If you need to contact me before that time, my home phone is 763-588-8655. . . . . . . . . . wwmci'~Uro~ll~ Y 3-12-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 2237 Noble Avenue North David Osbera. Applicant David Osberg, with property located at 2237 Noble Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition onto the existing home. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width over 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, March 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. . . . , 2017 Independence Avenue North 02-3-12 Terrance Avery . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2017 Independence Avenue North (Map 19) (02-3-12) Terrance Avery, Applicant Date: March 20, 2002 Terrance Avery, with property located at 2017 Independence Avenue North, is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a new home on an existing vacant lot. The following are the variances requested for this proposed home: . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed home is for 27.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 7.6 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Duluth Street, which is an unimproved City right-of-way. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of less than 70 feet, the south side yard setback shall be 20% of the lot width. The requested variance is for .68 feet off the required 13.38 feet to a distance of 12.7 feet at it closest point to the south side yard property line for the proposed home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property:2017 Independence Ave N Terrance Avery, Applicant . .. ~ 2G ~ .111).01 lIIil.50 :in'"!( f"r:. ".I~ ~ ~ o~ ,ricO'c ... . onlO &... ; -; >= 3= ::c PAR ... ~ \. \.: C-J r;o"': Cf..f l:iJ " t"~ (J) . :::> r ~ ::> o ;!: ~ lL v ~'t',. <3 ~ . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number L' ). - 3 - / 2.. Date Received 3/5/0,L Amount Received ,s-O,OD ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: ' 2. ao \1 l-r-\c\-e.rc.Nd ~N(..~ P\\i~" No. BZA Petition Date "3 \ a.\.., \ 0.').. 3. A ve..r ' LO\.k~ Dr. ltl1cvf~ City/State/Zip 7b3. 553- 930Lj Home Phone f\1tJ 1.55 if '/ Petitioner: ~(rC\.NC~ Name \l-\bS \N. M~d\"'\N~ Address 7fo3 - 5 '1'/-1 '1 '17 Business Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: \-\d~N s. ~~VWe.N Cte<.e,,-sec{). Pdit.c"~ vr lh(...s~cl ro .~(t (O(Y\' h-<- '4<<.. \~N S. -r:;:e.v~~ €.,$~+e. 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): L.o --r \ i e,\cc.k Y , LiAk€-v;e.lV lie0/,h 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: i Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prot Office . Other . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be~pproved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. . fro D)'\i~C' N~vU hCfV\~-\-O 'be bv, \1'. -R't u"-~+ kt~r.) 8. (Staff will complete this item) o~r I C"N <-€.... Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ SQ. 00 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. .~ UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effectthegranting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing,at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) fi if< Print Name /' C"'fe,j I If Ie,,/ / Comment ..1 .,..,. ,,, / Signature LL:'>~L:; /(~ " /'" !',/,<r ./ ,. Print Namt ,S'{ {S/+ll,'} Comment Address .21'J fIn Nf'1ie l-SS{)~I t1 (l:tl fe lX~tL-~ . .. - it c 1 ,,-- / ~ f r..:? /' , Signature ,~.,d,ILJ(i 111 -1ft ~ w: U - v -- ~ - - ,- .~' I....::;.._,;/._,,~'*" . Address a&l(, .. / rtlftndt{f.t0f . 1f\J l \ ./,,>" r\ t./ 't ' Print Name 1Z. \ r\~""\ V\ Comment \,,/ I I . l' ("/, ' " i ~r-... Lt " I [' q,\;i I'\. . \.vli Signature , \'" . i ",' }.-, t" . '-~. .J" i f I ~( . t:J , ,,\, ,LL'V\iL V,- '~\...L\t'lL{j 2, Address ~ ~ - ,..', _t.~ -1 /"~?!.. / I " " -, .;( un " i I\/'~d J'1..U) (0713<- ;. - { ;4ve. AI;. Print Name Comment Signature Address . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s} of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacentto the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told.about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name (:;<:..7!f /'f-l /) V. AI /?- t.J~" C {~ Comment Signature _ ~~p v /J:~.. ~~Address ;/0 / j.-:z:;,w~e~ ~~_CT Address d.cnJ. l\\eNJ~( sSohrJ Ave. /0. Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . AVERY HOMES I I I I I -------L--__--________ ~ I STREET I I I I I I I , I wlZ UI ZI WI Olw Z I::::> WZ o...lw wi> 01<( ZI -, I LOT SURVEy~OMPA"yt INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North 612-560-3093 Fax No. 660-3622 Establi Minneapolis. Minnesota 66428 g,Ut"'lt!>yarsmertifirab DULUTH ----------.------------------------ -----------~T------l~-------, ::/ ca."'. I . . . . :>- .# I , '? . , EXISTING HOUSEl " . IW I ~ I !E I 0 :2 1 """ Cl. I I . I.C'l ,--' (() to 1 (() <.0 I , 1--1 I I I , I 1<( I I 132.22 }..t () 'y r..---i-o;-o;,------t-........... ':35.0'"' ..... '.. : : :: i '0 . :0 0 ! iN ~ ! ____.J ~ . I ! 6' 0" OJ 0 f ! fj eo: i ~ ~ v f !~ ~ ! I ~ a. ! ! i . I : 26' 0" : r------.------.--------' :r- i~ .\ o Q).D . ~ (()8 (() r...................................... f~ 1-----132022 ! ' We hereby certify that this is 0 true and correct representotjo~ -' of /" ,/ " '" o survey of the boundaries of the above described land and th ~ . location of 011 buildings and visible encroachments. if any. from or on GARAGE soid land. Surveyed by us this 1st day of March 2002. EXISTING HOUSE Description: LOT 1, BLOCK 4, LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS INVOICE. .62126 F.B.NO 17-47 SCALE: 1" ==20' o Denotes Iron Monument r----------------T--------- I , . 1 J .. "1/ I .. N I EXISTING HOUSE & (1A f)/) Signed {M~. t ( ~~ Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No.21753 . . . March 5, 2002 TO: City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 RE: Variance request for: 2017 Independence Ave. No. Lot 1, Block 4,Lakeview Heights To Whom it May Concern, Terrance E. Avery has entered into a purchase agreement with the estate of Helen S. T eeuwen to purchase this lot contingent on the City of Golden Valley approving this variance requested. The reason for the variance request is as follows: (1) This is a legal lot with city sewer and water already in and paid for per the City of Golden Valley's engineering department. Lakeview Heights was developed many years ago and most of the lots have been built on. I believe Duluth Street was proposed after this development was completed. Duluth Street (which mayor may not ever be completed) reduces the buildable width of the front of the home on Independence to only approximately 18 feet. It would decrease the value of this lot substantially if you could only build a home 18 feet wide. Most garages alone are at least 20 feet wide. (2) The existing home behind this lot is only 11 feet from the property line and the shed is only 7 feet from the property line which would also be on the proposed Duluth Street. I feel the lot at 2017 Independence should be grandfathered in to meet the variance requirement that were in force prior to the Duluth Street proposal. (3) In the event Duluth Street is ever completed this home would still be approximately 26 feet from the corner of the garage to the concrete curb on Duluth Street which should give ample space to see around the corner. (4) This lot is also very low and if you do not keep this home as close to Independence Street as possible and built it further back on the lot you would need a substantial amount of additional fill which mayor may not cause drainage problems, problems with existing retaining wall and also be very costly for building purposes. I am asking for approximately a 28 foot variance on the north side setback from 35 feet which it would be because of the proposed Duluth Street to 7 feet which is more than what it would have been prior to the Duluth Street proposal. I feel the proposed home would fit nicely on the lot and blend in well with the neighborhood. T~~ . Terrance E. Ave8-- . . . . . . . . =.(i~Uro_vll~ Y 3-12-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 2017 Independence Avenue North Terrance Avery. Applicant Terrance Avery, with property located at 2017 Independence Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a new home on a vacant lot. This construction project requires variances from the following sections of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed home is for 27.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 7.6 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Duluth Street. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of less than 70 feet, the south side yard setback shall be 20% of the lot width. The requested variance is for .68 feet off the required 13.38 feet to a distance of 12.7 feet at it closest point to the south side yard property line for the proposed home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, March 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. . . . ~ 2700 Regent Avenue North 02-3-13 Evergreen Remodeling . . . Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2700 Regent Avenue North (Map 4) (02-3-13) Evergreen Remodeling, Applicant Date: March 20, 2002 Evergreen Remodeling, representing the property located at 2700 Regent Avenue North, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the Cityto build several additions to the existing home. With the exception of a garage addition on the south side of the home, these additions meet building setback requirements. The following are the variances requested for this proposed garage: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of between 70 and 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 5.6 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7.9 feet at it closest point to the south side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in May of 1957 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 2700 Regent Avenue N Evergreen Remodeling, Applicant 1 . ~. I. ..;"., ...'S' ,\\." " ";;''lJr:. " .. dt'l~ 1 ../!!.<3 ";lo~~"---.!~H -." 1& ",,,.''-, .. - q \"\,t~ I"';\'~~\ " . .~ ...."'~;..t n/:)/~t:o 17 {i~ p; , _I~ --:ffJ.3it"j2.~~~. , -,., ,. ~.,,'''4B2T ORIV ,,,,,A . 3rO ..c:,4'i1.tO' I : 5~.t' c; ,4o'9,,"!t"'j.. - - - ..a:: ~~~ -~~.;" . ,., 4900 : 320 st'~l...$...; \>'" 10, 10S $Co? .J'?'~(.J' ~. ~J~5 .- w -';:.;;.:'1 ~ ~, ~ oj ,.... IIJ ~ ~~:'" ~.5\ 2;.~;;;.N":.W:.iJS:!'~lZ'W t.,q:.." s ~,~ ';;~'1T''''I~' "/III"~"~~'~,~ --I"~ "" ~,\"\.I)".~! ~J~t::%;~ ~.. ...., ti ",. "I f)' .~.. 'I ~o,:'7 .-t.. . - "4S4# 'of 0 1 " te I 1- .'4--'-" 10'" . t. tw, II"'-I.,.t:j 4'~ ?_,,'S << ': 3, ". ,. .: ,r,. , ,e" /4' '., .. " D~.':' m" .i:~.,,,,,.."','... ~ '. '0 \tlA.~ ~ S';~ ~ \ \'iP~ - "Z."" I IDO ~ ~ -..: 1.'lioH . t.'""T- z, IO~'::"';',. ~-..- t.lI. ,S'" ~ 4 ~ ,... ZI r . ~ .. ---~ _u_ .,z.. %0%44 ~ '3l'4f.it ." ."7 " . 0- 'fl'Z4."JV. ~ ~: 3 0:1" I laJ ~ _.~.I: ~ 1'"",,'; ',"1'"I1('S,.. ~ ~. \ of< .. lot J.. '''~T''Z..~~..' I. ;...:J: ->> . . ~~~I -~ lVg-" . ~~.("" zil;:;. ~ ,0 ....~"",.. 0' ., %0 "if.)' '~~ .., I; \ . . ,'S~ i ~ ".20 r -l-'- 0 2 ~~'.: Go ~s. ~ '1>~~;... 2.'~ ' ,~.l' \ V,f, "- V ." . -'...... t -o! ,; i . I ~u_~____>;__" i . Os ~~.~.. ~~ act 11 ~ l:t~ '''4;' 0,. \ v(t , w,,;;,'l.. ~~ ~,""':-'..: I to 1 ~.~ ~ ~ I' ,J";l o. ... I.. t;I It) ~ -0. .. .,,":-....., '!l.: S~lcl'i",~ ..' ..., ~l ~~ ,L-. \- 'f'-! ~'" ",IV ~ -;.::t ~- II ; IS. .'~ % ' "''ll I' "I'lr.~ .," ~ :: 10" :.,,\1, il. 1....-'..;:. . ----.---.. U' :(> r,:,,,, 4 D ,.~ ~ so ~~~~ .P. '" >f ' il. " 1I.1:~" \: ' ' ,~. 11."0" ~I:f ~.'':; . ~ 1':,\ I <.f~;" '-I".'~ 'h' 0' """'l: ~ 9~ ,'~~'.20,.., i'" :: I ~ '. ,.; . D. ~ .;q 3: II . ~ ~~~",Q...~_oJ · <r.r., . . ", '<_ .9 0' ~ . "I' .",. . ~.-~--- u. ,,'o;oTo';'<o~9'>r1 ~ W> S~..~I~".~.!.t'.~ . '" it-" I' I"~ ~~ fl.. '..,;"':~~~Q~ ".,..'i\'(....~;;' I _..~.. '';--, II .~?:-"d' .,~~. ::;;iI.'~ .....15 ~A...",1"4 r-li",,~'~.:'JoIS.'11 ''e:l141 ~"lI\I II') ""' ..... ~. ~ <l 0 _ ~ e,t- .. ~ . ---l.e ~ . ~.... ,., I." jI.. ..~. -------- ~ ...--..--- n. 3 ..:;t~"'~lili '4 'l~IO~ 'l"U~. IS 0 O'~-':'::J~~:~:l :"\.~~~9~R= "..~~ 1 ~~ ~t. I' ~ ~, . ,. ~R~C~ ,::." ......,. . {::. r:e.-Jc",,i " :- . "~~'. . '>f n ~: _ ~ 10 ;. __-'!l.tJ._)~ '---,.---. il ~ .1 'J~,.,)~ ;i:. 7 :....~..I.. ':ii ~___ !n-r-~' b>!'!'. _.:J~,",,-y''I._..... \:--~---!:'o:.,. t ,.,. .. !':.~=:.t!_u. I c: 11{~~~ \' ~ 14 .&-- 1.:: i "" t-t , .,.. 1 ~ - _~-..... I I . I~" !'\ : ~ IS ..... 4 : Ii:: ~~. ;JE 0".;'" 1". ,,~;-' _ _.f ~. .:. o:,,~ 0,1""':10\. _ - - :-:l- "" '-<"<$1 0 u_____._ ~ ~ - -.,,--~ 6!i ~ --~.~N ~'" ;) ~,.. :of .-- 1~~~._J-lt.U--~~~~8" ,;1f",! r~~:}~4 4' te. 14 ~ ?:'~\II" ~tw0J-i..:;~~2 ).t~:~>~j~~---_ ~c..'-l~~~-~~'_l....J f$,:-s. .,~;:'f--J!J~--! w . - 10S " ;;~'iI--,_til' "',. .~. - -. 11 : '..'}.;,,~.!-: -, ''OJ ::fi ~I '(..~:. J. ~ ,~~. 13r .. ,.;;b: -IIZ ":M.!:S".~ 'l:.~~. _-;~ ' , ~ jj.. ~ {.~ "u.~ ;. :: ""~ II' . III "2, ~ 7 ~ .. "'~,~~. I>c .~~ ---- - ,&\ ----- jl;! . ,if 7~ - ~. S ~ ~~ll "';'<;:;l'~ ::: 14 b.-. II '.. '- --- 'l"~--e 'i:C.' .- ,..-~~:t.l : ,.~;; .,~. It : ,....",.. .''':',T''%: :.a;:;;. _ " ,.J.:J"?'i. ..,:.t T'I,." ',i' . 10 ;- ~~u 0 ": '.,ut r S,.1O~' ~ .,"" .."'''' ~'~ ',T"',., II.~l 4:':~f b" . \ . ~.~. Hl~c~"'" 't.\.'. .~.... ,A".:I '" J 0,:"", ~ "I .-."...1 U' ~ jl:.:: -.., I'" ",. 11% I 53" '~~.~:':~' ~~lS",. .,,; I~ ~ R.LS, ~i5' .JAO' ill . \ ~ .: 5038 CU' """R DO'AO': . <""'-- ~O: 5320 05",A . 1"'.... . -,..1:1"''''''; Iz 5047 50s? CJ'l" 5015 5001 4-7 '-.10& 4921 -U~ '.;.- '4'''./ .,....7 j- -,I: ... '5P5 53.. ~ ;H1l'/..n,'J +. '6'0 ..::",1 78 A so .,71 nJI ,. ~"'''''1 17 -" - - . 17 .'.. .. " 1.4"~:.L.\~::r~., N~~ RJ is . T...". . - J. , . .T''':! c. ~T>I"'I . ,"-. 0 , is , ~, : ~.' · 0,"'01, +\'.~. ~l~ tk ~7~'; ~ ~'I; t ~ II 4 ~ ,~ ; l'~ '/. ~ d. 4 ~ 5 ~ ,;; 7 ~ f.Lof./. ~ --r:' . 0 ",-...1':;.. L~ ..... 3D. ... 71 zJ! a. 71 11 11 .' - I' 100 8;: 4 .~! % ~ ",f{J! 14',.1 14"01~."M - l' ..,.. ,.,... .."..,... w, . ~.::--~- t$ II. I ~I 2.." '~~..I ~ 1 ~ i ~ <4 ~ g I 0 Z 3 4 5 62 - ..u.. ,to J- - '...., !~..,.,. .~. '" ~.,'~.;!, -. . . .~. ~ ',,;; ~ 14~ 1%9. 01 ~ -~~- ..re' lo;'e I ;; c:,. r:.- -f I." lot. I ~ ....- .-"; .. . c6 . .Z05040 SOJO 502 5010 4950 .S"CI 492D 4910 4900: ..~~., 4. . 1-1.~. '~j~{~~QAjVNVIEW. .(l:;:"'''.91..S:!L.' ;C, T:\:. 49'5 40'~' . 905 Ao.,TEI1tv,'CE.' S !. ~.", ;..~~;~. :,"~"~ii:'~l G'':''' 1T~~:~'~ii~;t~5 :I'~J'T~~;~J'-..:;' 101.15 '3..;'~ .' , -. ."" ',' 0 12' II ~ 10 0 ~~0..;,~'0<; 1\;;1IZ";'; ..~,_~~ I! Z' 4 1 , "1' I ~~~:\~t "'" " "' '."'~~'~R~~. ~~?~:, .~~~~~~:;1\~"4;'. .'S' ,~\7!~ ~f~~\ ~ ~;~ f .11 ; - i~ l-J!,...' I; S. ~,,1t'.\~~ .~g,. ., ~"~;~ ~:.'. ~~~~~'.::: .18 ~'~ ~4 tN" . .$" c.::t' '.t!755 JI,.41V -IU.-, '" I"" :It . 2 "~U:l 101.' ~.... ...~ "".... I' '.'.'....... .~, . :~ . :;.. G . .,~ I 4960 49SO 4920 . _!W,y, --"'ON ^ '85D'" I,. ;.. .Il" IIi. II. M . 8 ". '/. . "* T.'" Jt .... .., t.~~' ......y ~B" 'os, -;~.;:;.~ \. 0" ~. ~ ~'\. ~.... "'"'~ .~ I:J!.I ~,,"" ~~ :!,;:"" .~:\P S. I~ ISl.n'- ,;.fo;, ",r..,,:,"o . ~.~.6. ~,.... tf9011 . -.7....0;::: ...~..." ov -;; or"?Jf' -"/:" \" ,.:; 4 ~ . =r ~t: .;~~ ~ ~ '\: /. ~ . IS :,\\a.aY... ". .: ....~,,,..-j ;;5: '~;;,"... f': '~"O 7.1 . ,,'..-~. . I...." ',,0 .. --. -"=' - .....,.~ . n." ... - 1'____ ' ..... - 110 . 1> ..- ~ \ C' -. ~_::o; ISt.'\ ~"'II" --niT . , ! 0 ,,,, ' .. >to .....-.. ';o~..-o; /. I'! .... Z ~ .~OI: ~ I. ::;,. ~>>." 17 ..i~ !l.~~;'t-", '".'~'l"g 0 .' l:t,." ti.. -...0 po . ~ 2 . ~ 3 :~ .V;~ci 1~'lI U !::.~ ~~ ... - Z .. .. ~ t.. 110. IJJ '~:'\"fJ~ .IC'-30' ,"II ~".J ~ . .'$.w... ..' o. {-.~ ,:::.~k~Zo' ~ S~:; 48201 o~ ~ 5... ~ ..PI'ifMARI.....IO<\ANE-M,.".z.::'~3."" 5 8 ~ ,.o'Jl",._ :er;:z,,,.,,; I ~il' " _ E...... - r YV.- I:. L.. .l5a?S....:~'ir.> 1:':: IS-,i't:;:e.' 0 .. l/"'4:.J ".4.I!I,l_... ":>''' '00 100 1~'41.1:Q." ',. ~.14U+ I"." 2: IZ" It.;' .....J[:~. ' t;~,. ".;.... !: Sf25,!: 5055, =tL.~..\ --:: .~ lEl_ ~ .. rg :.; . rd ~ 00/4. .~. !;.<","; 8::i 7 ",i'l:.~u,~. ~.....~~ 4':';: " ,~~g.JO 17~; ~I~ "i,,, :; ~; 0' '. - ~. C~41. ~....... - o":e ~- '\l..: r' ~J ,- '.I.n O' - IOn" ,., 100 101'l;: t,,~__ __~~ . 1%S.Ja LIJ. ... ~r. ~ l' U' III I'- ,j · ~ ..- !"-.. > . ~ o~ I ~ ~ :$. M'r:l'~.'~.:. z ~ a .~~ :{:.~~!:" %o~. <t ~ 1/ n I' ~,~ ~-:elt :" It. ST ~ -" ,." . ~. , ~" .4 ... .wi' ..... ... ,. .J( . ~ \; $110 A!.l .~7ZII~. ~ ~... . . . ~ ...t., n,"; f'M It'. "I. . >-;;" '.. '0 ; ;,z('\.. 3..,.. J( HAMPTON"'''o R ~'g Z 2, 21.0I:.:::!. ~ IZ IS ~, a:: g~ IZ~~:l\ ..... 5025 - 12< .. <t .... .... a:: 1l1.,~~ '2'. I .~'-_"" ". NO .2'" ::> lJJ I. -- .'(:;-:. 5105,.. .., ... 0 ". !l Q. "'. : 1.11l ..:;-""..1 Z", 3 = 4 ,"'~o.l ; 1t~:;.. g~J3 ~ 14i~'" ~13.3 ~17"n r,o "" ~ . Uo 100 ... 'G...;!! %: rS.I~.Gl'~:c.~ ..tIJ-f\l,tll ItCe -, ,II -~za..t \. " -Zo.",Chs, q#Yf. -- ....' " _.... <?..,,,,.,.,d,....... , , .",'" ~~"', f<,~ ,.';) <,0 )'< ~1r ~'l'~.I'.I'~ ~ ,~ -ot" "',' "oil ~~>t . , r (Revised 1/99) . . . Petition Number 0 J- - 3.- } 3 . Date Received 3/ b jo,)- Amount Received 5"0, Ci) ($50 residential- $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: ~ 700 IffLj.enf &.~n~~.N. BZA Petition Date --8/0/02- $-t(j] 114/ If ed/, -3 j?-k/o:2- l1j'eeJ:i~, Petitioner: el/(U'gr~n !fe-fl.{OJeJt'^'t1 TnC-. .. N~;egO 0 f).e-/ / D tJ:t M'L -ecft'f1f1.- !I1tV SS1zf Ad~~ess . v City/State/Zip- 1S~ q~~ ICfd:A q5~ q~(;; :;'358 Business Phone Home Phone fj c; rb f}.(,h, -, S e J.f rSOt" 2. 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: G{').JlA-/ arJclJoat1 f) G-tu"d n-er I lM-,'h.'1n1 er /5 +r,L ?tn €/ytl Uttrl:rtLc-/-rJ-r, 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Lo+-& I 5/ocf- g J /Jawn ~r..e-6 fi'r~r A-{erf..I'.-j, '0 t} 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: ~ Single Farnily _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. Gtm1~ aU,hoYi TAd w,'11 Irdr/~ M~-5I'k 'ICl -Sd f](LU/ (,LFrerv/&YLt Ixt $/_tJ/~ 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or otheLevidence, if appropriate. ItfftL~ LcL , . 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey qlust show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $50,00 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. 0~~ Signature ofAp icant... .. .... .. . UNI..ESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicanfs property and directly acr()ss the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) . Print Name ./If;1/2V of' #1/'/-5" 7~il-t7nd Comment '0.~ /Y' b,-I/YM~ /~ .,-tt;, ,~<~ ~~/~~~~~A~.~~ ~ Signature h7 ~ Q... ~a--.JL/ Address:?t;,. BoR:::.1 r~ cl!0 ~::;::e Z1;t~~'.ti;~~- ---/ Signature Address --- 7CJS Print Name Comment 'P-e te + L l~dC(1SeL..L l.~~kJ. Lrlce.. Gl Y1TCe odd rl~ Signature ?Jfft-p. Address ~ 7~o th.j""'* tf...e . _ Print Namelli Y !sH(\0 ~~orvm Comment l . & ' 4 p I'YlQ Signature . Print Name 'i-.l y-'~~ :0. ~ h) C c'~r\ 7 .c:\. \~f:> Comment. LyY\~'(~?1~\V~ (''-.C~'~'-+\dn: '-5<. M ~~~:s .~.~ ~\'~;'YK:r"r) Signature~~~lI'o.. (~I...j",'r-o.. ~~_~St~" Address 1.:v,,\~ c~ili\:\ ~~s.... '" Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . . . . EVERGREEN REMODELING, INC. 5800 Kellogg Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 922-1922 FAX (952) 926-4790' PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 9. Brief statement of the reasons, necessity or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. We are applying for a variance to the side yard setback requirement. For an existing lot between 70 and 100 feet wide, the side yard set back requirement is 15% of the lot width. In our case, the lot size i$90 feet wide which would require a minimum setback of 13'.6". Currently the setback is 19'.9". The proposed garage stall addition is 12'.0"wide. The garage stall addition proposed would infringe on the setback by 5'.9". The side yard setback after the garage is constructed per plan would be T-9" instead of the required 13'-6". The primary purpose of the garage stall addition is to add additional parking space. The house currently has a one-car garage. With the addition, the homeowners would each have a parking stall. In order to provide adequate width for parking a vehicle, the minimum width that could be designed was 12'-0". The secondary function of the garage addition is to provide much needed storage space within the garage for the lawn mower, bikes, sporting goods, etc. The garage is designed at 12'.0" wide by 26'-0" long to provide the additional storage space requested. The length of the garage does not effect the variance applied for, only the width. Because the house isa split level, there were no design options to accomplish the clients goals other than a garage addition. Because of the split level, a tandenstall was not an option, nor is. there a possiblity of carving out space within the existing footprint of the house to make room for more garage. . . -./"..,- . . . . . . . . www.ri.gOMmlt~y 3-12-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 2700 Regent Avenue North Everareen Remodelina. Applicant Evergreen Remodeling, representing the property owner at 2700 Regent Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley. Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition to the existing home. This construction project requires a variance from the following sections of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of between 70 and 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 5.6 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7.9 feet at it closest point to the south side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, March 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. . . . " . 1525 Jersey Avenue North 02-3-14 Paul and Judith Carns . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 1525 Jersey Avenue North (Map 15) (02-3-14) Paul and Judith Carns, Applicants Date: March 20, 2002 Paul and Judith Carns, with property located at 1525 Jersey Avenue North, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant have approached the City to build a room addition to the existing home. This addition does not meet building setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. The following are the variances requested: · The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home is for .3 foot off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Jersey Avenue North. · The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width between 70 and 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 7.45 feet off the required 12.25 feet to a distance of 4.8 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed room addition. Previously, this property and the property to the north, 6909 Olympia Street, were the subject of a Minor Subdivision that was approved by the City Council in 1999. The minutes from the Planning Commission meeting on May 10, 1999 and the City Council meeting on June 1, 1999 discussing this Minor Subdivision are attached for your information. Also attached is a fax from Mr. Brad Beisel, who now owns the home at 6909 Olympia Street. In this fax, Mr. Beisel provides an agreement between the Carns and Howard Gilbert, former owner of 6909 Olympia Street, regarding this Minor Subdivision. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in April of 1987 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . . . Subject Property: 1525 Jersey Avenue N Paul and Judith Carns, Applicants '-'UU/7"/, 1).~'Uf~~' ~.I.\i:,' ,.;v.p. .~.n ~.;." " ,,~. I., AiQ'~ ',,': 'JJiJt..:. ,,...~~ ~ - C'~~- e ~.' ,,~.. e. ~?''''''''''-.r_.1 .~: N._ --;J .... - If: - . .' '''"''-I <foP" ':"",<\:>' t ,t." Z. . .~.,. ,( IS l:> "".~. e e1 ,,---.,. Iu ) 7.: ~Sh,. "- ,-l' "'.' 11 ~ . . S2. .':""$ . I I. /~..' ""_______ . ___ !S 4'l:. -~~;~ 2~~ ~ '.. I ~...: . ~\. '~41v.~~~' .~,. \ . - 77. """"-- ______. . ~.. . 1\1. ~ OJ ...-.. ,. ,. , ,,'-f....A......~, ::. \ /0--- ~ _ '_ ;' ;:.: 9"';;;~' ~ \ C' E" ". 1'.> 5 1i"",~~~. \'" .~::! \ II ~'O.. /~ _ _________.g~: . .,~.~. ~ ;: ... 3 ,. "" 6.,S . .. .. ... .. ~~ " ~ . -: ' lj....."'... . t. ...., ~ ':4'e., z. -- ,....c. '1'< ,~C' ....,g., '" //~ ~, ":'.n,.' __, It . ; "',,:'t*f '1 ~ . .J2Q., I-ft's ~. 8 ,srf' '. : i''''~,... -:: .... ;I .ii;~ ~ ~;;;: ~_ _,It \ ~"6S3" ~r · 7 '; '. ~"" '~. ,.... )( , ~ I~ "F~ ... \ ib ~--...: ~ '., " ;~..z~~ I~J/.,J I ~ ~- I s A~!JS"4 :: ~Rj Oldfl:~"$",'" ~;:-!I:'nSI ;S ~ El;. C /1'f . "'" !\} · ' ~;;;' 1js ~{:.~i~'" "'7~ "'~ - ~. , ~ ~ ~- ~ 5:)' J- ~ Ii t . ,~s . - I~~ :l . .. "e : -~..~~,!~d'I{f;.:J-. . '~ 'Wq-_ '" y~~l- l*~. I .,.., ''"~:i-.- s :' .~ .....;:~.t/>-,._ 'lie....oI" . ',r, ~... I --:~~~l":"~ ~ \.~ q.. ~ l~>lt... 55 ~ "'oi}. : '" \ ~__' ". ~ ~~ ~.. ~ 2 l;1~ <::: So ~,. .... ~ . ': '0 1>= ~ 4.. ~~ ~~: . '_ ~-Ili o~" 2. ~Ic GOl-otfi '" . j.,' "0. '- I~ - 'zI'!!!;. . / >10' .,- !! "~~-'.S . ~J~60 ~.. UHf/" : ~~. ~j.Z"''''}~. .~I:" ZI'-Offt J .~~' 171.1 ~ ;:'~R AVE.': i pllP-1: z~ J~ II~ \.. I~" ... ~ \'~ffi.--1 . ~ r\ . I ql-l?b' :.'~'J11. f..., ~ 3 ~... 1 Jow.}>'",,', ' ~'. , 1ST ~~ .~!!'"~. "A , i""! ,.. I.... 11. ~~~~'"' ~~ ,...~.-.'" 14'.04 ~.Il"." 0 I!: 's,.~ 4 . , .~,' 1, " "'. ... . ~,~ ..:.. . ',; I' . Z V'" ... I . ,. ~'I:.l5 2.:. ii; Iis~. - s .. ,.: · 11 s"'~:i.t ' \ ~~.,.~~ lr ,.~ ~'" f~ ~,g. Z~ 04 ~,!l 10. J ~ ~~J~ 4 ~ '0 14l}."T"'\ 0"" r.,-;;-....."'r.,-r. 0;. ~ ,8.'; "" 0 . . . '_' I.... .. .0 "I$'''~' So -~ 'S~"51 50 . . ',' . S. G ..... ~ . .. .. I~ :;1 : ~ I;!;' : S: 1 al ~ 'il ~ .. o~. l!! I ~ I ~ :: l ~ :. !i"~ '" 4' '~:-1; ~ ~ l41~ ~_: 4f!4i: 4~ 41,..t 4~ 4DJ 3'f:" ~~ ~~~E~ 3~ i.i 33 : l~ 3d II Z'JJ z!' Z1 z"" zIs~ 1~4" z~_, z~ Zr:2~ I'~ 18. 111;; "J I~ 14~ I~~. ~ I-III:: k5l,. ! if : 31 ::;{' 1 ~ 1::1, 1 _, ~ ~!.~ ;;' ~. !l'. ~I'.~ . ;s:,. .:I:. It :i. ~. ~. ;:J.' ,~. ~ 1,So;'-" ."".1.-,.1."".1. So;:~'8.15 So~. .-. .~. .~I. ..:;....'..:'.s. ''''i_So ~.;!\,il15. .:;;. .>lj. .:!I50 ii.,:~;... 1\,c..II_..,." ...,... ~ "'" ~ _ . all v. '0 'A6824 6800 6746 67S8 6740 6 fZ4 6700 6620 6610 ~ ~I ti!Sls 8412 ~ . - ~o_\\1iit ~ "'i '" :J.:J: b&J1 68/7 6801 674$ 6l'37 672$ 662/ ~11SM'.9 I:.ID4 oIM14 6436 64/1 :l2!_ '..J .J...... :',~ . ....-i" -. oe.1'.50 .. . .~. '0:' .,.. ., .. 'o;:!" ".. . '~!:.)~i'~ ..~.... - I:"'-. . li-!!:[]"': TO.. . " ~F ,:II ,,:tI :;J,~Jf~ ~.;:;: __:i I.:; ! ~:: ~I&J ~.If!. .: -. ~: ..;~ 5 !.E : ~ 50 5'. s~ ,~~ it. 5S S, S'F'i... E ~ _ '. IS ~~ '30:,~ ,S '~'T '8_: ,f 10~ l'S 1~ lr.l4,.:.lf ~ ~'tll..:tJ. 1~'~ I ~ 8~! r.i'ij I~": 84, 8S18:~' llll 88..: I' ::t 1;;;; :. ;;;. .. <<I b fl ~. .~.. a. ~. :"'~ .; : ~. ~:i .~: . ... .~: .--: ' , :. ~'. So;" ."1. ."-.. ..... s.. EW2 ~ ~A.'I~ 5. . ."'. ...... .::!I. ."'. .". I.~:g;, fl;;';l'....:,o' . ._., ~50 I.~.._...",!.. : ;: I ~ I J::tl :; 11-,.. ~I.J. 1 '0 ;lJ .: ~I ~. ~~I: ';l 1 ~ i' II ~I :;t: ~ 1 lO. ~ ;1 I i ;143 14r'l 1~1~14; 1~t..H:I38:l'31!1~~ I~S.. I~ I~~ 'j.ai '.! ~1'''~IIl IIZ'!lllS Ili'lll~ Ilf Il.~f Il~ ,,9':111 1I~1~:I"1'1I4 1Ii}li~: II~ 1I0~: 101 ~'of:lo' 'o'I,,:J~!.:lo ;oa. ea: .......~: ....,.">..:.:~..;;; ..l1 .~ .~.. "I :)e!! ~T~i,,~. u~: ::. 15+:. ~:::e ~-$.lt!;s. ..- ....;:.1.. !;.. I~.f<( ., ;:-5.. .:!:.."f.. ". ..~ ..T..~,.. ..:!.. ..:tiSo ~'~'Sl.."'. IG.~bs:S'.~!So ~J50::: 5'., 25-S. rasa ,VtCV 7008 6{J~8 #1916 Ct8WI 684'\A, ~ 6812 6800 6742 6730 61'" 6620 s~ tm28 6500 S424 6401 7057 7tUl 10/9 roOI B!MI 6935 6921 6905 fi!l:l:- 6809 6'," S,4. S7,D G?25 717 6621 i:Jr;~~ 1#:;' SSIF G4M l r!;I~~'II'''''I':;r~d.il'i;I- . ",'f'. ".~SoI'N-"li\"+~:r:]'t:"..-~I.~'O'~'OI50.. t';,l"'~I;"!! '!:';s.~ ~,. '::0" ,""!- :;!I< :; ~w! 0;; ..,J... i;I ~~ ,ij I:: ,; -tz. ~ I,:; ~I . ; ; :;" ~ "I.~ iI 1; "1 _:; . ~ ... 14': 111\4 114. f ~ sril,I 'J1f,! IS4 Ism-s S" IS1'" IS!,: \59' "0: I" "Z :T"r: ,,~: I~~ ","' "f "8 ,'" 'XO'Inrl f"ilm IJ4II:'~S: n, 111 1'18"11:":136 ~ ~RI8,i'l18~ 18jj,18~ IS ;e~ 't-::l'. .~i li;Ji, ::r'."i.;-l4- 8. .';;' ~!e.;l. :2'. J ." . .:~. e:,. ;.lI" , ~ , oJ I~.' 1f.'.!:I. ':!".'i~'I;"''':'~~I;;;It':05':!'' .:!l. -"" '-~~J[:.... .4.. ,. S.I:.~s. .~. ''"'SO :~^~. ....~ ~~ U,~:~, ~qll ~~pt ~ a: ~ ~ U L .~ ,IYI V ... ~ ~;:1': ~ : ~ .~. ,j S. ~~~l'j:t~~~lflrll1~ll1~~~~'Z!4]~1 !Jl~1230-1 l' ~Z'lZZ1 Zl'1ZZS Z14im ZZZlnl no m liS 1111~" ZI;:ZI4 ~t1~ZJ, 21f;zliJZo' 203:201 to' Zos~ ~l~4 203 zoi to, I Ze !il .. ~ ~ '...1 1 l:1I ..;; ~ F- .' ~ ";l . ~ . ~. e't;. ':, .3 i '" a,..:: 'Ill ~ i .:;. , ~I"~,.,, I III! . .~. , 5 ~... I .:!l 0 .;iI." .5!:!. ~." .' 'f1l rZ~.IS "0 . 'T.:! . ,.s . ,. " .~ ~~ .--tlI.;;; ...i1;~ ,"4\:19-' 50 'f,,'i'J,.. _~. r:; 5. 15;';." . fib< 70Z4 7004 6/1SO 6SH 6920 6900 -'lNnl' ,,<'4 _.... 6800 6 ~ 67:186730 6718; Id 661q,,~ 652fJ 6$08 . 64.sz-.6418 6. JrX't 7/JP" '?nm "lM"' 011:'0.'" 69.21. S8O!J "01 ~"39 6733 ST23tlTIT a: #:.~~ 1:44" I. 6!12S. 6$1$ II ''', h::. I":!; SO~;:f'r$1 s.~ s. P' ~ So >- ~~.II :>D i'l;: so "_' '" '::,' -.... "':1 . ,5. - 1'I.:;!l"'i"I~" ';!!' . JI!o' 50 ~~ 1m,s. , t 14< -::,. ., st. ~.L' j ., ~. l&J ~.~. ~..!:=I. ~. ~ ~I. .a. ~ ~H:t: il',!.L~' ~ ~. ~~.s: . 110 . Ilt4! Z4.i!Z S:Z4~ 141 1 Z131Z4' Z5~ll Tlm~!?zs. z~1,;511~Z5f :..Zj58Z~':Z'0 Z'IIZ'! m Z'4 's Z"'l'l~ l,'i:~Z10IZ..1~1 llZ,Z13 .Z141Z1~ l1'q , ~ .. 6 1 ~ 1::1 I l:# :3l I. ('1.J ~ :;jj~I'", I": ~ ~ :% :E!;' J ~ ii, l: . I ~ '" 1 A s.-..... ..~ .. :"'Ii! s. ...=,,, ", 50" ., 1".lS 50"1 ;. . '- .'.l;. 1 .'3. -~. ''''''0 ct \i!LlIl'!d . I. . ., 5. -' '.lJ ,.. :: ,~ 3l' 1 ~ I;;~ ~ 68$,1;a ~: ~ i"l~i ~ ~I. :i::q .;!~l ~ !S1"l-~"I', ~ 1&.., lrrZ1~4'~ 1~;334 mu.:m:I~~~ !~fjl'~ ':'18' Jz:,j~'1n\ ~ !!l?~1f- ;ur'12'i'l11 ~Zo'"l'~I9I!'18~ !11 !!I't'fl;l,S 3141 m 31r.~11 310 ~ ' ~ 1,30' lor: >>J30~5].!j'1:30~ ~ S~jt ~d ~.~ 5 ~ .:t .;;l · ;;1' .:::. .I.. ~~.,. ~ =.. ~ .'<;I.'~ J. ~ .;. ~ . . ~ ""'e';' .1. ~.I :;.:! .. F-j.., . =:!I ~ I ~ 1 ~I ~, I f=: - - ~ -~!! I ~ Oftt.T ~ 't'!! ~ ....1.....':'1 - I"~ ;\ - I -.;- f . ~ < ~..'. r ,. s.. -..... S'-. "" So ".11 s. uu ...0:. . ""'l' .......... ..~. .~. "-'0 7-ii"'-'1 , ~."-" .",.. IS 1.'0 " I... ,. N ." 7054 7024 700' 69$0 6934- 6920 PLYMOUTH' ...... .,_ 6',. .,~ I .... .~u ,,,,,6540 6$14 ~', ,. . ~~ 6741 67~1 6721 ~717 6709 . <<""I . I=- . 65/5 6609.1t r):. ,V ',": ~.' i a": ~~.. :' ~.. :50~ Im5: ~.~. : - ~ ":"~ ::!'.'; ~ ~;!~ "$~ ~l:i~~'~'~ l~' :~:, ~~\i3103~1 ~~.~. . 11 . i~ ~ ~~,.. l,I53!1~134!.J34r:34~134~!4!J34Z-:341J54f ~34'j!J3S~!5Ii3szhs),JJS4:5S~~S~ 1;1.1'58 35' ~ ~l 3'fl3'~ ~ ~.~ I. ~'~ ~ .r.~. \ il\. ' '~7 'PI. . ~ ~ 1;;11 1 ~ ,:>> :;;if i!' ~ 1 "!I ~ ;;a : l;l ~ ~ 1/; 1" '~' "l ~ ~ ' . _. ... ." - 51S",I.-T S 1"-:1' """1-:'),' '.~. ..J:!.l.'" So ".4'.lSol"S;.I.::.".L-:1,' ,,-. ."'. .".. !.,.~ ,".' ."" JY:. . -, ~tJ/4.: '~!" , - --.1._4_ - _4_"'_..1._ -...... -- - _...._J._ - - - '-/~_j ~l;';~ :.l ~,-,/ ,,, I.~ . - i ""----- - !811~si'y':i~lll1 31' ~'f1n4 51?c }to 1" m m 1 . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number tJ;2... - 3 - I ]t Date Received :~ /5"/ ()~ Amount Received 5""0. a:.> ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 1525 ::r2SlS~ \\"l3'\)"~ ~ 2. BZA Petition Date ~~ 2Cc, 1...001- 3. Petitioner: ~uL ~ ~-:::S-~\1'\\. \\. C\\~ Name \... \~~ ~~.. ~~E. ~ ~~\.)~~ ,~~ ~~1.'.~ Address I O::X~\T" Gity/Statelt1p ~.. bU.. ,,10' ob~~ ~ to\1.c;~4' b\\).., 'b~.5AY .S\o1 Business Phone Home Phone 4. o~ LorS ~, \ \0 \\~~ 5. 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential:"\, Single ,Family /_ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . , . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before o~ after the building permit issued. . .. 4// /~~~ ~~ 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section . : l . , Waiver of Section Subd(s). "il ''''". ;-', ~ 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the. granting of this waiver. . Attach leUer. photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10: , ".J<. .,,'..... ..-'1." : '{" ...--1",",. J A current or usable survey of the pr.operty must be attached. Proposed surveys are.not acceptable. Th~survey_musfbe prepared-by.a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, . ifin question.- Also. ttie survey should show arFapproximate lOcation of any . b~i1di..,gson adjac.ent propertiesrelative.to the side(s) where the c'onstruction will take place. .If the survey-is larger than 11" x 17". theapplieant will supply seven additio!1al copies of the survey for use py the Board. ; ..' , . to ;. ..1 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 5 0 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application E UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. -;0.' . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's propertY and directly across the ,stre~t. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . - - . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition "is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, afwhich they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name ~\C\t~ WeLLEll. Comment Aa,leE: Signature5~~ Address lS3'=' .j~IZ~ME ~ Print Name Comment 7n/J~ . Gr'Ib& p~;j' Signature .~ b~ Address t tift) W~;j"X; Print Name Comment 17"--(> "''7 c 2:'~ . r ~A ~~~~ Signature ?~ -V~ Address /i50S -:/~~y &ve-A Print Name -::,D;..ttd ge J ~ -t ! ~ . < Comment .....L t5 VJPd.Sr: 1-Ju.5": I v Signature Address ~9tJ? CY~;"'LJ/tA- , v . Signature Address Print Name Comment ~9/? ~_dl~/dA7~.. Signature Address . Print Name Comment . ' . " Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . , . . 1, . . We would like to put an 8-foot addition on the North side of our home only. This addition would be the full height of the existing home and would be the same in appearance. We currently have a very small living room and dining room that are very difficult to furnish because of room size. The 8-foot addition would almost double the size of these two rooms. The addition would allow us to install a fuel efficient fireplace (the existing fireplace is not now and to our knowledge, never has been used) which would rid the home of "cold pockets" experienced during the winter months. There are presently no windows on the north side of the house and as a result, there is limited natural cooling during the summer. We would like to install additional windows on the west side of the house and one on the north side of the house to help with natural cooling and air flow in general. The proposed addition (including the installation of additional windows and installation ofa fuel efficient fireplace) will tie in nicely with our plans for landscaping of the front yard. The addition and related improvements we want to make will enhance the street appeal of the home. They will also make it a more efficient home and one where the living room and family room could accommodate moderately sized furniture. . . . . . . . . . . . Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 10, 1999 Page 2 III. Informal Public Hearinq - Minor Subdivision Applicant: Howard Gilbert Address: . 6909 Olympia Street and 1525 Jersey Avenue North Request: The subdivision will reconfigure the existing two lots by adjusting the location of the property line between the two lots. Director of Planning and Development Grimes briefly reviewed the proposed minor subdivision. He stated that the subdivision involves two lots on which there are two homes. He indicated that the purpose of the subdivision is to move the property line between the two parcels 10 feet to the south. Grimes stated that the existing north lot was created in 1978 in order that Mr. Gilbert could build his home at .6909 Olympia. He indicated that the City approved the creation of these two lots by a waiver of the platting code. Grimes stated that in 1986 Mr. Gilbert purchased the south lot and built a new house for his mother and sister. At this time, he discussed with the Building Department his desire to move the property line between the two lots 10 feet to the south. However, he did not go through the entire process necessary to formally change the property line. Grimes stated that in 1998, Mr. Gilbert sold the house on the south lot to the current owners, Mr. and Mrs. Carns. Grimes indicated that the Carns have agreed to the minor subdivision to create the new property line since it was their understanding when they purchased the property that the proposed property line was the official property line. Grimes stated that Mr. Gilbert is now selling his existing home at 6909 Olympia and the new buyer (who happens to be a real estate attorney) noticed that the legal description of the property is only 74 feet wide since the property line was never officially changed. Mr. Gilbert now wants to go through the proper minor subdivision procedure to move the property line. Commissioner Eck indicated that the house on Lot 2 will be 12.8 feet from the proposed property line and asked if this meets the setback requirements. Grimes stated that the setback requirement is 15% of the lot width. He indicated that it was determined at the time the home was built that it met the setback requirements. Mr. Gilbert and Mr. Carns were in attendance. Mr. Gilbert stated that when he bought the south lot in 1986 it was his intention to move the property line. He indicated he had spoken with. the City and completed the necessary survey of the property. He indicated he was unaware that anything further needed to be done to change the lot line. Mr. Gilbert stated that approval of the minor subdivision will make the property line official. He stated that both property owners thought that the proposed line already was the property line so nothing will change physically on the property. . . . Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 10, 1999 Page 3 Chair Pentel opened the informal public hearing. There were no comments. Pentel closed the informal public hearing. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Eck and motion carried unanimously to recommend to the City Council approval of the minor subdivision as requested. Reports on Meetin~s of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. City Council and Board of Zoninq Appeals' Chair entel stated that she would be the Planning Commission repres HRA m ting on May 11th. V. Jeff Oliver, City workshop reviews. Grimes provided a brie ackground on the Wast ater Plan. He indicated that one of the main purposes of the Ian is to ensure tha. e City is in compliance with the Metropolitan Sewer Syste Commissioner Hoffman aske he reas for the recent increase in residential water and sewer rates. Thorne respo ed at the City rates reflect the rates charged by the Metropolitan Sewer System (for s . er) and the City of Minneapolis (for water). City Planner Knoblauch stated that ~ s harged to the City Oy the Metropolitan Sewer System have decreased but City quired additional funds for repairs in the system. 9, number 3 I the Wastewater Plan, regarding Trunk Sewer Reconstruction. Ther as general discu ion regarding reconstruction of this line in conjunction with the enia Avenue extensio project. Commissioner, artens asked about replacem t of sewer lines in connection with the street repavi project. He asked if the City con iders replacing lines that are old, even if they are III functioning, when the street is torn . City Engineer Oliver replied that steps ar aken to correct any problems in the lines hen the streets are under constr tion for repaving. He stated that most of the ewer line in the City is clay pipe whi will last for a hundred years if it is not damaged. However, he indicated that it is v susceptible to damage. He stated that most of th sewer system is televised so e City can effectively monitor and repair lines as need . He added that the City also . . . . ' Regular Meeting of the City CoUncil June 1, 1999 Page 4 * 'nutes of Boards and Commissions MOV by Micks, seconded by LeSuer and motion carried unanimou to receive and file the minu s received as follows: Board of Zoni Appeals - April 27, 1999 Planning Commi ion - May 10, 1999 Human Services Fo dation - May 10, 1999 - Bassett Creek Water Mana ement MOVED by Mi s, seconded by LeSuer a motion carried unanimously to receive and file reek Water Management Commission minutes of April 15, 1999. Public Hearina - Preliminary Plat Approval - 6909 Olvmpia Street and 1525 Jersev Avenue North Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development introduced the agenda item. Bradley Bisell, 6909 Olympia Street, reviewed the preliminary plat and requested the Council approve the plat. Lester Eck, Planning Commission, presented the Commission report. The Mayor opened the meeting for public input and persons present to do so were afforded the opportunity to express their views thereon. Hearing and seeing no one, the Mayor closed the public hearing. MOVED by Johnson, seconded by Micks and motion carried unanimously to approve the preliminary plat for 6909 Olympia Street and 1525 Jersey Avenue North subject to the following conditions: 1. The owner(s) will grant the City any easements that are necessary as required by the City Engineer. The applicant will now prepare a final plat that is consistent with the sketch plan for the minor subdivision. Because no new lots are being created, a park dedication fee will not be required. 2. 3. 11~ . . . ~~/~~/L~~4 ~~;~O O~4,;l~OOO~~ MUC.:>I..oML..C.r:; 1-11'11.1 Oc. ~ :>c.L.. Bradley N. Beisel 6909 Olympia Street Golden Valley, MN 55427 76a~544~9608 (home) 612-436-2222 (work) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION L TO: DI:ln Olson; City Planner Fax: 76~1.593-8109 FROM: Ibad Beisel DATE: March 11, 2002 RE: CallIS Application for Variance on 1525 Jersey TOTAL 'l'mMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING nus COVER PAGE: 4 (If you d~~ not receive aU of the pages as indicated abov~ please caD 612436-2222) rl-ll.:lc. ~~ MESSA4;E: Here is an Agreement between theCarnses and the Gilberts that explains the bound81) mistake and shows that the present boundaries are the ones that were originally supposeel to have been sold to Cams. This Agreement was signed before I bought the property and was II, condition to my buying the property. If you m'te any questions please call. UNLESS O' 'HERWJSE lNDICATED OR OBVIOUS FROM THE NATVRE OF THE TRAN$l'dlTTAJ..., TfIE JNJ:ORMATION CONJ'AlNEI.' IN 11DS FACSJMILE MESSAGE IS AnoRNEY 'Pruvn.EGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMA.TION INTENDED FOR. THE 'I:'SE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENITIY NAMED ABOVE. If THE READER OF nus MESSAGE lS NOT THE 1NTEND6D :tECJPUiNT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR. AGENT RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER. II TO THE IN1'ENDED REClPIENT, YOU ARE HEREI! ~ NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION. DISTRIBtmON OR COPYING OF nus COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHJBJ:I'BI'. IP YOU RECEIVE THIS COMMUNICATION AND ARE NOT SURE WHE'IHBR IT IS PRIVILEGED, PLEASE IMMBDJATI'LY NOTIP'l US BY TELEPHONE. AN]) RS'1'URN 'I'HE OJUGINAL MESSAGE TO us AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA TBB u.s. PI: ISl'AL SEIlVJCE. '1'HANK YOU. -/.. - . . . ~~/llIL~~L ~~;~O OlL~~OOO~~ nuCo::lI...Ml...Cor:: 1-\1'11.1 CCO J. ::lCoL. !"""1-\\;lCo tlL :. .e Agree.,.ent Th. s Agreement is entered into by and between Paul E. Carns and Judith A. Carns, husband 3J: id wife, ("Carns')) and Howard W. Gilbert and Judith A. Gilbert, husband and wife ("Gilberts~ ) W] IEREAS) Cams are the owners of property located at 1525 Jersey Avenue North, Golden V~I ney, Minnesota, the true and correct legal description for which is as follows: Tb ,at part of the East 25.00 feet of Lot 58 and that part of Lots 59 and 60, "B ,~lmoDt," lyiDg South ofthe North 84.50 feet thereof. Tb ~ North 23.00 feet of Lots 133 and 134, "Belmont". ("1!'he Carns Paroel", see survey attached); and W:I IEREAS, GiIberts are. the owners of property located at 6909 Olympia Street, Golden Valley, Mi mesota, the true and correct legal description for which is as follows: TIJ I~ North 84.50 feet ofthe East 25.00 feet of Lot 58 and the North 84.50 feet of:..ots 59 and 60, "Belmont." ("'] he Gilbert ParceP', see survey attached); and W] 'IEREAS, prior to June 15, 1998 Oil-son, a partnership substantiall:y owned and controlled by OOberts) was the owner of both the Carns Parcel and the Gilbert Paroel, and WJIEREAS, through error and inadvertence, when the Carns Parcel was conveyed to the Cams the 'illstnunents of conveyance incorrectly descnbed the Carns Parcel as: Thd part ofthe East 25 feet lying South ofthe North 74.50 feet of Lot 58, aUIR that part of Lots 59 and 60 lying South of the North 74.50 feet thereof; aDln also the Northerly 23 feet of Lots 133 and 134, all in "Belmont."; (":1 'he Incorrect Legal Description"); and W1IEREAS, the Incorrect Legal Description of the Cams' Parcel was listed in the mortgage: 'or the Carns Parcel given by Cams to Southern Pacific Funding Corporation on June 15, 1998, . ,vhich mortgage was recorded July 1, 1998 as document number 6922777, and WIIEREAS, Gilberts and Cams wish to take the necessary steps to correct the above described I 'Q.Tors. ~~/~~/~~~~ ~~;~~ ~/ o~~~~~oo~~ MU~~~ML~~ ~NU ~~~~~L t"'~\:l~ ~~ .,l.l. . N')W THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and undertakings set forth hereinafter, evn. and Gilberts hereby agree as roBot 1. Carns will give a Quitclaim Deed to berts for the correct legal description of the Gilbert P:~ reel. 2. Gilberts will give to Cams a Quitclaim Deed for the correct legal description of the Cams par. ~eI. 3. Carns agree to take aU steps reasonab necessary to secure from Southern Pacific Funding <: oIporation, or its successor, a Partial Rele e of that portion of the Gilbert Parcel . inadverte:r tly encumbered by the Cams' mortgage. or Amendment to said mortgage of same or similar efJ: ::ct. 4. Gilbert's agree to render all reasonable help and cooperation to Carns, and to reimburse Cams for any and all out of pocket expense reasonably and necessarily incurred jn connectioll with obtaining said Partial Release ofMo gage or All.lendment to Mortgage. 5. In the event that the deeds need to be proved by the City of Golden Valley prior to recording, Gilbert's agree to take all steps neces and reasonable to obtain said approval, at their expe:lSe, and Cams agree to render reasonable c operation to Gilbert's in that effort. . 6. Carns and Gilberts agree and underst d that Gilberts intend to sell the Gilbert property tel a new buyer. The terms and conditions 0 this Agreement shall survive any sale of the Gilbert pr<1perty and shall enure to the benefit of any chaser of the Gilbert property. vY'\ IN.WITNESSES WHEREOF, th~ parties here accept their hands this l(g<lj day of Ll!. ;J.t-J.. ..'J 1999. .;~ J ith A. .: .:cans ated:~.!&- ,99' Paul E. Dated$"!~ . Page 2 of t ;) L.I !) I L. J ~ ... J :a :a ~ [ / j J ) 1 J ~ N I';' I: '- '(~" I ...,1. . Ie'.." . --- OL YMPIA STREET ~E;~'...~~ ----I ~ Il ~." 1\ Il . {::: : \. ,(!; (~ I ,,} ~ 5 : I': rr";;, "....j:;~1; I · . -'.1---1.Y:;:;;;....-;...-;;,=;:L;.:.I;;::.....;.;" --, J'~ u, : 'T." . I "......'. .,...~ ,........ . t .}: .-....., ;.1...1) '~ ~~ II ~ - - , l".,Lt~+_=_--t _.J ,\' ~ . . ~~"',l~ ~::..r II - - t ~ I I:. II'.'''' ~ll:~ 'r " .. i . ~ ". '\ ': ,I' ,:a - /- ~ ;.... .~~ . f: lid:. /;..<.,.~,..t~ . 1/." . I ., i , I . I i 15':' ;;"-'1" :..:: '.' :'~' ",' , . f' :. " : .. ,."7.,' . ~ ,.u... I .'l~ Ii' 't: -- " J'1 tr-- ~:?_~!H "', ."'''" "'f.""~.I''''=~ ~,;.,-b .,; 1 , , . -'- t . ~...;t.. ".' . .,,_...:.._, '. t'.. 1'!:'.~1 ~ l 'I, I ~...~. r=-=~ :; :h ;...~. ."t~ - \ ., , I:' _,' --r,.'; ,. --!~., ,. :'l. o . " ..&i ..., .::.i,~:'. It .; .....,.. ....'" ,.." . Id~6D t 1.../10 I..., ,IIA. "..11. I'" .1 "..... I" ,.. 4 I~I :", :\. ~:} '\.~.- ........ '.J! ~.~".I'" \ : ~"{.."'A If; 71 ":/ (, ... - ,,:,_" \ · h 1 . &;1 btr1 fOlr ct I a .. ~ ... .. .. i '\1 " fl,t ,.... ~ 3i ,I .[1 Ii \! \lj ~ ~ ).: ~ >... ~ ~ ~. '-tJ ':I ~ '\ . S":RVrv 'OR: HO\VARO GllDERI DE sell I PlI O~I S. lIl(Ulhuly Parcell I he Ito'rlh 8.s..s0 Icel III I.." llI~ll,. UIII~Pl 01 Lol ~8 and lite lIorlh 34. SO leel or Lois ~9 amf 611, "Ut 1 mo nL .. Ana' 10, )62 Iquale Irrl. ISolllbelly rarull Ihal pari or Ihe [.51 15. ODlcrl ollol U amI Ihal pnl 01 lols 59 aod 60, "&elmoRI." lyill9 Soul" 01 Ihe /lGrlll S~. 50 letl IMrn!. 'lte ~erlll 7J,OO Inl ollols IJ) Jld B". "Otlmonl." Mea" 9,6)6 iquaft he\. lYe hereby torllly Ihalllli, il a lruc '11 tOl re,I .epruenl"Iion or 3 IU' vey 01 Ihe boundaties 01 Ihe land bovc dp It Ilhed and 01 Ihe localion 01 all bulllli",I, iI any. Ihere- n. alld all vhiblf t'1Ir.roach. menll, it any. "o~ or on said land. Daled Ihls Ulh day 01 M.u'h. 193'. E G ^':. E L D & /I 0 ,\' A K. I ~ f.. Sur Yfye n " ., ' I 1J)'_H~-L -. . _~ ......:.:.___.. -' . . lie e\\'. G r Ivna Mi.." ola lIce"~e 1.0. 112$) NOH, hlsling ''''ge on 101l1l1lHI~ ..llcr.1 nol ,110";10 hcreGn '10 be let.lovedl. CG\1'hS pfhrc e \ i ~'~,,~1 t. f' Jd' It" . 0" ..-..- .--. -.' .--...---- ..-.---- WWW'd.goUm-ll~ Y 3-12-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 1515 Jersey Avenue North Paul and Judith Carns. Applicants Paul and Judith Carns, with property located at 1525 Jersey Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct an addition onto the existing home. This addition requires a variance from building setback requirements. Also, as a result of this construction, it was discovered that the existing home does not meet current setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home is for .3 foot off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Jersey Avenue North. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width between 70 and 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 7.45 feet off the required 12.25 feet to a pistance of 4.8 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed room addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, March 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. . . . l' 2004 Hillsboro Avenue North 02-3-15 Roy Smith . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2004 Hillsboro Avenue North (Map 19) (02-3-15) Roy Smith, Applicant Date: March 20, 2002 Roy Smith, with property located at 2004 Hillsboro Avenue North, is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). In January, 2002, the applicant had approached the City to build a garage addition. This addition, as well as the existing home, required variances from building setback requirements. At the January BZA meeting, variances were approved for the existing home. In addition, the BZA approved variances to build the proposed garage addition farther away from the property line than the applicant had originally asked for. Although the applicant agreed with these variances at the time, he has now reconsidered what was approved and would like to ask the BZA to approve variances for the proposed garage as originally requested. Below are the current requested variances: . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed attached garage is for 2.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32.5 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Hillsboro Avenue North. · The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width between 70 and 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 6.5 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed attached garage. A friend of Mr. Smith's, Carl Starkweather, has attached a letter explaining why he feels the BZA should reconsider granting these variances as originally requested. The City's file on this property does not contain the original building permit for the home, but Hennepin County's property record system states that the home was constructed in 1950. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 2004 Hillsboro Avenue N Roy Smith, Applicant - ... : ':..:\.! ;;I VI 1<> ..J~ :; . ct,,,, x:~ ~ :">oJ () ~ .. ~ 2 V Q..~ >= 3: :c .I$4.D/ 1,61.50 sue 30'5'''[ r =~ 0 ~ ""~O ,~ : ;;}: C;J le)' OUTLOT 21 It ! N8" ~sf!'w 1L.! - _ 31".i:: OL. I ...:~ I ';.4-11'... PARK' ... ; ~ ~...! r:...: r. r-t' ..1..' . ".~j :..:... ~. :-," - en - ::>. x: .... " o Z ~ 0. " ~-j >- _.-t- O. 0 \('!;." ~ ," ~Ve / 1Y4/ ~U ~ -4 ~q . ..... ,U,l$MRe$. -.- . . . . (Revised 1/99) Ill: '" " Petition Number 01- 12 - 56 0'> -?-/} Date Received 1/1/1/ iN . 0'g. ~,. Amount Received ~.:) 50, (JO ($50 residential- $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: / :1.. (J D Lf ~tnr'~ ~.;;{;/. BZA Petition Date r 1- I cr - :2 C>.(J' J , Petitionerl .-.A ~ ~f'~-j-Iv (.:r~s~ Lj (" iZL~ ~-A). ~ %Stg~~~~~Y \, . 7 t: 5 - ~ l/-C.,.. 3) 70 Business Phone Home Phone J 2. 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. { Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found o~y): ~E "J I ~T I fl/ 0 P n llS ~ #2.004 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: i Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. n- /.. J JOIA-IaI ( Car 'I {l.r~ <:1 e " - 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. - f --cR 7Y)- ~-<f~~;tjL , Signature of Applicant - UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s)of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waivercould have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name Comment r;;l(b sf 1f'(lIL kuAll'€ -( SIJ4Nt:>S G'~ / . Signature ~~ ~ ~_ Address CXJ/~ H1t...(SgOl C> AVE', Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Ju.. ..1(,,,,, & .A-a.,. ~ LAND.u1tVEYOllttl AND LAND HYl:LO""I:HT CONauLTAN'Q ICI2J 544-'..7 3357 WlIlCONSlH AVII, No. MlNH.ANUS. MINN. SN27 SURVEY FOR: ROY SMITH . '100 J/ HILLSBORO r AVENUE 2S.0 -,-- r'---.- -- - - - 90.00 _. ~ I . ai'll, I I I~., ZS,o ".- -.-.-..- ----:-- "--'- \f"O" ,..--- j", ~ I:>" '1- Z<l.oT: /0.r. . ~ I '.1'0 Ii- / ,/ ..<.- -, ../ (~/ - .; .,- --- '" - ./ Iro,., ~.t:) h.o .;. 9tJ.oo- .vae.;J f~ ;jl/eyj 1>.( 1-\14 . .(;.0 . \J ~ ~~~ ~ ..... \;. ~ ~l Z~) ,. <:Y/:, ......... Or '" '--o,<_:!/ Z'5.o1: 11 NORTH "" .. .... 'i- \ ~ '" ~ l\l \ ~ '" o rI- , ! Iron ~.Q ,1..0 DESCRIPTION. . Lot 1'7 and that part of Lot 18 lying South ot the North )0.00 "feet there~f including the West half of.the adjoining vacated alley, Block 2, LAKEvIEW HEIGHTS, City ot Golden Valley, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1":::.. I hereby..mly that ,hillUfVey woo prepared by.... or under my supertilior and that I am a duly Regist....d Professional Surveyor under the laWs of tht Stote of Min_ / ./ ~QtZ?-~ ~O DoIod ~/Z?/8tf- 1!.og...",/lZ&7 JQ .(2(' ef- F 8~:I . . . Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals January 22, 2002 ar meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tues , January , 2, in the Council Conference Room, 7800 Golden ValleyHo , olden Valley, Minnesota. 'r McCracken-Hunt called the meeting to ord :00 p.m. I. MOVED e I, seconded by Smith and motion carried unanimously to approve the D er 11,2001 minutes as submitted. II. The Petitions are: 2004 Hillsboro Avenue North (Map 19) (01-12-58) Roy Smith. Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback · 2.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32.5 feet for the existing home and proposed garage addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Avenue North. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (e) (1) Side Yard Setbacks · 6.5 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the north side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. Olson stated that this same petition was on the December 11, 2001 agenda, and the applicant wasn't present at that meeting, but is present for this meeting. He stated that the applicant is proposing to build a garage addition that would require variances for both the existing home and the proposed garage addition. Roy Smith, Applicant, stated he discussed the proposal with neighbors and that they are in favor of it. He stated that he would like to have another garage and that right now he only has a narrow tuck-under garage that isn't suitable to his needs. . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals January 22, 2002 Page 2 McCracken-Hunt asked the applicant if it is the width of the current garage that is the problem or if it is the height. She stated that the height seemed to be adequate. Smith stated that it is the width that is inadequate and that he would like the new garage to go all the way from the front to the back of the house. Shaffer asked the applicant how wide the door is on the existing garage. Smith stated it was 6 feet 8 inches high, by 12 feet wide. Shaffer asked how deep the existing garage is on the inside. Smith stated that he didn't know, but that he could barely fit his vehicles in the garage. Shaffer asked the applicant if he was planning to add a single garage bay with a door. Smith stated he would like to put in a double door. Shaffer stated he was concerned about the size of the variance request from the side yard setback. He stated he has no problems with the applicant adding a second garage stall to the house, but he feels a 12-foot wide stall would better and therefore would change the variance request to 2.5 feet off the required 13.5 feet instead of 6.5 feet off the required 13.5 feet. Cera asked the applicant if he was planning to keep the old garage. Smith stated that he would keep the old garage because it is a tuck-under. Shaffer asked the applicant if he would be willing to make the garage 12 feet wide, with a 10-foot door, instead of building a 16-foot wide garage in order to maintain a side yard. Smith agreed. Cera stated that would be keeping in line with the Board of Zoning Appeals allowing two stall garages. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve 2.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32.5 feet for the existing home and proposed garage addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Avenue North and 2.5 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 11 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the north side yard property line to allow for a 12 foot wide garage addition. Westwood Drive North (Map 8) (02-1-1) Behza Caroline Mazloom A Iicants Request: . (e) (1) Side Yard Setbacks off the required 1 distance of 11.55 feet for the existing home at its closest point . rth side yard property line. 2 . . . From: To: Date: "Carl Starkweather" <carlstarkweather@hotmail.com> <dolson@ci.golden-valley.mn.us> 3/8/027:09AM Dan This is the first draft of what Roy wants to communicate to the P&Z Commission Carl Starkweather You made a good decision with the information that you had but now with all of the information hopefully you will be able to see your way clear to make the right decision, both for Mr. Smith and for the city of Golden Valley. The last time that Mr. Smith was here he was unprepared to offer you the information that you need to make a decision. He was here to visit with you about the plans for his garage but because someone from the city had visited his property he was not aware that he would need specific dimensional information about his home and property. With this application we hope to clear up that problem. As you can see from the attached photos Mr. Smith has a tuck under garage. The height of the door of this garage is seventy-eight inches. Its width is ninety-five inches. It isa non-standard height door that does not allow vertical clearance for his pickup truck to enter the garage. The depth of the garage is also non-standard and does not allow parking of large cars. Mr. Smith was able to park his full sized Cadillac in the garage but the only way that he could close the door was to park the vehicle against the wall of the house. At best that was an accident waiting to happen, one day he would slip and find himself parked in the laundry room of the home. He was forced to sell his full sized car and buy a smaller vehicle, which he still cannot park and walk around to the service door with the garage door closed. I offer this as background to begin to show you his situation and why he is making the request that is before you. On an every day basis Mr. Smith drives his pickup truck. He uses it to get to work, go shopping, visit friends, and all the other things he does daily as part of his active life style He is now seventy-two years old and 1.4:11 say a pretty spry seventy-two. But as he has lost a step or two over the last couple of years it has caused him to start thinking and planning for his more advanced years. One thing he has noticed is that he is as not as sure footed as he once was. His driveway slopes and in winter it is easy to loose ones footing and fall. Wanting to stay in the home that he raised his family in for as long as he is physically able, and to avoid the possibility of serious injury Mr. Smith needs to build an attached garage that can house his pickup truck. Mitigating his need to traverse his sloped and sometimes icy driveway during winter months. The variance that you granted him previously would allow him to do this but there are some flaws in how it could be executed. The largest one is that if he were to just add another garage stall on the end of the house he would be faced with the decision to use a standard door that would allow him to park his pickup truck, or use a non-standard door that matched the door on the existing structure. If he were to get any use out of the new structure he would have to use a standard door but this would adversely affect the appearance of the home. In short it would be unbalanced and ugly. It would, as any ill-advised modification be very unpleasing to look at and cause a decline in property value. Another dilemma, to get to the new stall through the existing stall he would . . . P have to raise the door to be able to get past the parked car, or not park the car in the garage. Let me reiterate, this is all information that you did not have the last time that you saw this application. Mr. Smith and I have investigated the possibilities of other designs for attached garages including attaching it to the rear of his home. Although it might be possible it would be very hard to navigate, and because of the need to move the existing electrical service it would be very expensive. That is why Mr. Smith would like a variance that would allow him to build twenty feet closer to the property line than the home is currently. His plan would be to remove the existing garage door and reside that area. Add a double car garage with a sixteen foot wide by seven foot high door. MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/supportlworldwide.aspx cc: <emery.starkweather@udlp.com> . pr~l . . ];'&1 . . F&l . . . . n - P1010058.JPG . . . . WWW.d.~Um~!t~y 3-13-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 2004 Hillsboro Avenue North Roy Smith, Applicant Roy Smith, with property located at 2004 Hillsboro Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition onto the existing home. This construction project requires variances from the following sections of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed attached garage is for 2.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32.5 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Hillsboro Avenue North. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width between 70 and 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 6.5 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed attached garage. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, March 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification.