The URL can be used to link to this page

04-23-02 BZA Agenda . . . Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room I. Approval of Minutes - March 26, 2002 II. The Petitions are: 2700 Regent Avenue North (Map 4) (02-3-13) Evergreen Remodeling, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks . 3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Regent Avenue North. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. 4500 Chatelain Terrace (Map 8) (02-4-16) Bernt and Deanna Grosberg, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 8.17 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 26.83 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Westwood Drive North. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. 5360 Lowry Terrace (Map 3) (02-4-17) David Ralev, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . .024 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.76 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Lowry Terrace. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. . . . 5380 Lowry Terrace (Map 3) (02-4-18) David Ralev, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . .06 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.94 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Lowry Terrace. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. 1840 Spring Valley Circle (Map 6) (02-4-19) Bill Knuth and Monica Panizo-Knuth, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Spring Valley Road. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks . 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the east side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. III. Other Business A. Election of BZA Chair B. Discussion of May 28, 2002 BZA Meeting IV. Adjournment 2 ) . . . Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals March 26, 2002 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, March 26, 2002, in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair McCracken-Hunt called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Commission ecording Those present were members McCracken-Hunt, Sell, Smith an Representative Shaffer. Also present were Staff Liaison Da Secretary Lisa Wittman. Member Cera was absent. I. Approval of Minutes - February 26, 2002 MOVED by Smith, seconded by Sell and motion February 26, 2002 minutes as submitted. imously to approve the The Petitions are: 3301 Major Avenue North (M Dale and Elizabeth Kislin Request: Front Yard Setback ff the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.4 feet for the ome's front entryway at its closest point to the front erty line along Major Avenue North. g the existing home into conformance with front yard ck requirements. aiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings . .8 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 9.2 feet for the existing detached garage at its closest point to the existing home. . 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet for the existing detached garage at its closest point to the front yard property line along Adell Avenue. Purpose: To bring the existing detached garage into conformance with accessory building requirements. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 26, 2002 Page 2 ( Olson stated the applicants are proposing to build a room addition to their existing home. He stated that during the construction process it was discovered that the existing home and detached garage do not meet the setback requirements, however, the proposed new addition would meet the building setback requirements. . McCracken-Hunt questioned if the back southwest corner of the addition would meet the setback requirement of having ten feet between the house an arage. . 5.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a dista feet for the existing home's front entryway at its closest point to the froperty line along Major Avenue North. . .8 feet off the required 10 feet to .2 feet for the existing detached garage at its closest point to th orne. . 10 feet off the required 35 fe i ~e of 25 feet for the existing detached . garage at its closest point t t yard property line along Adell Avenue. to approve the n must meet the 10- Dale Kisling, applicant, stated that he was aware of the ten-fo t and that the new addition would conform. MOVED by Sell, seconded by Smith and motion carrie following variance requests with the condition that the r foot setback requirement from the detached garag 4840 Westbend R David and Michel Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.2 feet for the roposed front entryway at its closest point to the front yard property line along Westbend Road. . .8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.2 feet for the existing home and for the proposed second story addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Westbend Road. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements and to allow for the construction ofa front entryway and second story addition to the existing home. Olson stated that the applicants are proposing to build several additions to the existing home. He stated the proposed rear addition meets building setback requirements. . 2 . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 26, 2002 Page 3 j ,/ However, the existing home, the front entryway addition and the second story addition do not. Smith asked if the second story addition is only an issue because the first story of the existing house doesn't meet setback requirements. Olson stated that was correct. . MOVED by Sell, seconded by Shaffer and mor feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 2 its closest point to the front yard property line required 35 feet to a distance of 34.2 fe second story addition at its closest p with the condition that the entrywa . setback because Hunt added isual conflicts at he thinks dditions and o be closed in Shaffer stated that in this case it makes sense to go into the front of the shape of the lot and the fact that they are on a corner. M that there would be a lot of yard left to the east; so there woul and that the house doesn't currently have a front entry. Se the board is going to be seeing a lot more requests for fr porches in the front yard. He stated as long as they ar structures, he is not concerned about these requests. nimously to approve 5.8 r the proposed front entryway at tbend Road and .8 feet off the ng home and for the proposed t yard property line along Westbend ain an "open" entryway. 2237 Noble Avenue No David Osber A Request: Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (e) (1) Side Yard Setbacks ff the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the posed garage addition at its closest point to the north side d property line. To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. Olson state at the applicant is proposing to build a garage addition to the existing home, which would require a variance from the side yard setback requirements. McCracken-Hunt stated she was concerned about how the garage addition would be integrated to the house. David Osberg, applicant explained that the garage would be tied in with a hipped roof. . Smith asked the applicant if the new garage stall would be accessible from the existing garage. Osberg stated that he intends to make one, or maybe two, passageways into 3 Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 26, 2002 Page 4 ( '. the new garage addition. Smith asked if excavation would need to be done. Osberg stated that a slab for the garage addition was put in five years ago. . McCracken-Hunt asked how wide the garage addition would be. Osberg stated it would be approximately 19 feet wide. McCracken-Hunt stated she was concerned about the addition being 19 feet wide because that is really a garage and a half. She stated that if the garage were 12 feet wide instead of 19 feet than the applica' quest would be for a 5-foot variance instead of the 1 O-foot variance requested. Shaffer stated that in the house and then the s' don't have any pi ns t back. Shaffer st usable and f addition d garages tha peals has Id extend the orage space. Shaffer explained to the applicant that in the past, the Boar considered a single car garage to be a hardship, but in thO garage addition off the back of the existing garage and Osberg asked how big of a garage the Board typic Board generally allows for 12-foot wide single garages. Osberg stated he would like to add order to have enough room. He stated the a and improve the aesthetics and he beli emergency vehicle access. Shaffer stated that the e d 22-foot wide double car 14-foot wide garage addition in Id increase the property value d still be enough room for Sell stated that he would be willi of.10 feet because the bearing the proposed addition. I feet off the required 15 feet to a distance e existing garage would take some space from . he neighbor could decide to add an addition onto their be really tight. Osberg stated the existing neighbors 'to the side because they have already expanded in the 12-foot wide garage addition would be tight, but it would be he applicant in this case has the option of building the ed that he thinks 12 feet is the maximum width for single car rd should allow in these types of requests. ere are any requirements for how deep the garage can be. Shaffer . he setback requirement would be 20% of the lot depth. MOVED by Sell, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to allow 3.1 off the required 15 feet to a distance of 11.9 feet at its closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. 2017 Independence Avenue North (Map 19) (02-3-12) Terrance Avery, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 4 "' I ./ . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 26, 2002 Page 5 . 27.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 7.6 feet for the proposed home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Duluth Street. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home on a vacant lot. d Setbacks Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C . .68 feet off the required 13.38 fee the proposed home at its close property line. of 12.7 feet for south side yard Purpose: To allow for the constructi me on a vacant lot. t lot and is also a corner lot. He s home on this vacant lot and is equirements. Olson stated that the need to request a variance for the north if ity has any plans for the unimproved City stated that the City has no plans to improve or Olson stated that the property in this request stated that the applicant would like to c requesting a variance from the front y applicant has recently indicated he side of the lot. McCracken-Hun right-of-way along Duluth Stree vacate that street. McCracken-Hunt asked if Avery, applicant stat re any proposed plans for the new house. Terrance 't any plans for the house yet. Avery stated that that he woul ' low and to additional fi s a legally conforming lot before Duluth Street was there and riance if Duluth Street weren't there. He stated that the land is se back on the lot it would need a substantial amount of pould cause drainage problems. applicant how he came up with 46 feet for the width of the proposed house. Ave explained that the house is going to be a 46-foot wide, two story house with a 22-foot wide attached garage. After discussing this, the applicant stated he was mistaken in withdrawing the south yard setback request, and would like that request reinstated. Shaffer stated that if Duluth Street were to ever change the home would be quite close to the street. Avery stated that it would still be in line with the other houses in the area. Sell stated that the Board has to grant the variance because there are two houses next . to this one that are just as close to the property line. 5 Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 26,2002 Page 6 \ \. Shaffer stated that typically the Board doesn't approve variances for new construction but that this situation is unique because of the site topography and the fact that it is a corner lot. . MOVED by Smith, seconded by Sell, and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 27.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 7.6 feet for the proposed home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Dulut eet and .68 feet off the required 13.38 feet to a distance of 12.7 feet for the prop at its closest point to the south side yard property line. McCracken-Hunt Gardner stated it 2700 Regent Avenue North (Map 4) (02-3-13) Evergreen Remodeling, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21 , st; . 5.6 feet off the requir proposed garage add yard property Ii t to a distance of 7.9 feet for the closest point to the south side Purpose: To allow for th home. ion of a garage addition to the existing . Olson stated that the appli home all of which confor addition on the south side Iicant how wide the proposed garage addition would be. a 12-foot wide garage. eighbor to south feels about this proposal. Gardner stated they they think it will help enhance the property. McCrae asked if the material being used would be kept in line with the existing house. Ric everson, General Contractor, stated that the material, including the brick veneer, would match the existing house. Shaffer referred to the survey and stated that the applicant would also need to request a variance from the front yard setback requirements because the proposed garage is less than 35 feet to the front property line. The Board discussed the survey, the dimensions and the lot lines. Shaffer asked Olson if the applicant could add the front yard variance request to this agenda. Olson stated that he couldn't because the neighbors would need to receive a new notification. . 6 ) . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 26, 2002 Page 7 Sell asked if the applicant could sign a hold harmless form. Olson stated that hold harmless forms are signed only if the variance request is for existing conditions, not proposed additions. Severson asked if they could proceed with the additions to the back of the house. McCracken-Hunt suggested they go through the permit process and proceed with the work that is in conformance, but to not proceed with the garage ad .. ,which doesn't conform to setback requirements. MOVED by Sell, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried u feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7.9 feet for at its closest point to the south side yard property line. approve 5.6 garage addition MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Smith and motio front yard setback variance request until the A . Meeting. nanimously to table the ard of Zoning Appeals 1525 Jersey Avenue North (Ma Paul and Judith Carns A Ii Request: 21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback uired 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet for the o t its closest point to the front yard property line sey Avenue North. existing home into conformance with front yard k requirements. er from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks . 7.45 feet off the required 12.25 feet to a distance of 4.8 feet for the proposed room addition at its closest point to the south side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a room addition to the existing home. Olson informed the Board that the variance request for 1525 Jersey Avenue North has been removed from this agenda per the applicant's request. It will be on the agenda for the May 28, 2002 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. 7 Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 26, 2002 Page 8 ( MOVED by Smith, seconded by Sell and motion carried unanimously to table the request from Paul and Judith Carns, 1525 Jersey Avenue North until the May 28, 2002 Broad of Zoning Appeals meeting. . 2004 Hillsboro Avenue North (Map 19) (02-3-15) Roy Smith, Applicant Olson explained that Zoning Appeals a en home and a vari the applican time, but h the Board to . 2.5 feet off the required 35 feet to proposed garage at its closest po' line along Hillsboro Avenue No .5 feet for the yard property Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Setback Purpose: To allow for the construction 0 home. Request: . 7 (C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks . 6.5 feet off th proposed yard pro .5 feet to a distance of 7 feet for the ition at its closest point to the north side . Purpose: struction of a garage addition to the existing riance request was on the January 2002 Board of t time the Board granted variances for the existing ild a garage addition further away from the property line than asked for. The applicant agreed with these variances at the idered what was approved in January and would like to ask variances for the proposed garage as originally requested. is was a new submission. Olson stated yes. Emery Starkweather, representing the applicant, stated that the last time Mr. Smith came before the Board, he didn't have any of the facts or figures relating to the proposed garage addition. He stated the door on the existing garage is a non-standard sized door and a new one wouldn't match the existing one. He stated the applicant would like to continue using the existing tuck under garage for storage and add a19- foot wide garage addition. Shaffer asked the applicant for clarification on whether he was requesting a 16-foot . wide garage or a 19-foot wide garage. Starkweather stated that they would be 8 ., . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 26, 2002 Page 9 installing a 16-foot x 7-foot standard door, which would mean the addition would be 18 feet wide on the outside. McCracken-Hunt referred to the survey and stated that it shows the addition being 16 feet wide. Starkweather argued that a 19-foot wide double garage is not a big garage. Olson stated he was told the garage addition would be 16 feet wide also. Shaffer stated that the existing garage is small, but it is usable. He has concerns about the applicant originally requesting a 16-foot wide single garage and now, at this meeting, he is requesting a 19-foot wide double garag e suggested to the applicant that he put a detached garage in back of his hous e' e the addition would only be 4 feet from the property line. Roy Smith, applicant, stated that the house next door to 3.3 feet from the property line. Olson explained that th a variance to build a garage because they didn't have a told the applicant if he were to add a double garag variance to be t door did receive a all. McCracken-Hunt really bea triple garage. request because first the est and now the applicant is at the original request was wrong equest came to the Board the first id he wanted a 16-foot wide garage door. Shaffer stated it was his inclination to deny thO request was tabled, then it was back to the or asking for a different variance. Starkw and that there was a misunderstandi time. He stated that Mr. Smith has Shaffer stated that he asked M going to be a single stall ga applicant was told that th Hunt added that the origi is a standard single at the first meeting if the garage addition was n or a double stall garage addition and the ou approve a single garage addition. McCracken- est for 16 feet was negotiated down to 12 feet, which 'n to the neighbor to the north and stated that they had a tuck d it to living space and then built a new double garage. ch variance request is looked at individually and that he 9-foot wide garage. Sell added that the lot to the north was ouldn't have put a garage in back. McCracken- nt stated that the Board needed to act on what was noticed to the neighbors. She explained to the applicant that he could come back to the Board with a new variance request for a 19-foot wide garage, which would probably be denied, or the original approval for a 12-foot wide garage would stand. Starkweather stated that he would talk to an engineer about building a 16-foot wide garage. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Sell and motion carried unanimously to deny the request for 2.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32.5 feet for the proposed 9 Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals March 26, 2002 Page 10 garage at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Avenue North and 6.5 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the north side yard property line. III. Other Business The Board discussed the possibility the Council approving an ordi Board's wish to keep front entryways 6 feet in dimension and to remain open structures. IV. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 9:05 PM. 10 ( . . . , io ~ " . 2700 Regent Avenue North 02-3-13 . Evergreen Remodeling . . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2700 Regent Avenue North (Map 4) (02-3-13) Evergreen Remodeling, Applicant Date: April 17, 2002 Evergreen Remodeling, representing the property located at 2700 Regent Avenue North, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11 .21 ). As you are aware, the applicant received variances from the BZA at last month's meeting for a proposed garage that encroached into the south yard setback area. At that time, it was discovered that the applicant would also need to apply for an additional front yard setback variance for the proposed garage. Notices have been sent to the neighboring properties for this variance request. The following is the variance requested for this proposed garage: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed attached garage is for 3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Regent Avenue North. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in May of 1957 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . . . Subject Property: 2700 Regent Avenue N Evergreen Remodeling, Applicant 1 ~. I ",;;~",,,';',\,,. 10 -;:,"iJr:. ~ '~~"ir.: 1 ..~ ..~~~.. ---.L~f ..... ",& ,.....- m. - q "t~l: 1!t1I~~~"',~,~":~"~~Rf?/~ {~{T":/ii_'~_~ifJJ-~~ ..~:~. , ,. · ~'!~oo.'" .482: DRIV 320 Ssr/Clt ~!'O i" 'I.1.~. fC>, 10S !l:-~2 ~ ~;r\~'J ~I::. ~.~ S.~f iL"-~~"~:'l \ ... ~o "~ ,:..4t III ~ "~:l\ ~.:" 2~.;;;,;.N"::w'i1:1 ~i'?'lJ' ",q:.:. s ~,~ . ~j'l:4i>'I=' -/ \,~:'~~5 ,if "\'''~\.1~\\9.1 !l~'~!~" ~~ ~'r;'1~ : . "",.. . ~ .It'." " "'.. 7Y"" . t.. "i 494'. '49 ~~I '.. v "'1 ~'.r.'\ 10+ _ .~. ...' 1(11":.,"10...... 4 b~~1;,"5 f....' = ...' G. I""'" '~,..:: HI ...~ '. I 0:'/1 of 1'," .~.'~./ToI!,,),,/!to ICI 1\\1111 ~ s!: ... ., .. ,00;. -. 'OZ.4 'M) ~ ~"'.'I'n:.J ~""!'l'= In& 10, ~ ~-... TdU 1$ ~ ;., 4 ~ ; r-e Zf r- ... ~ . ..d: u._ ~J~z.. %D%.44 ~ "3\:ff-J1 ," .~ . .:-. ,.14. ;J ~ ~ 3 '!~ 1\ ..."\ bJ ij ~ oq /__"''7 ~ <:. ,tz-",.s,. 7 ~'\ ;. c.....'.1" '" I. ~ -s .":!: 1 e' ,\ l~ It ;'~':-=,'~" .~~. ~ ,0 o'r.;,~<,,'.. ',~, o~ I.. io' '-'l{r .~ :! 1 .~' .\~. ,.s~ I ~>- ". %0 -r O 2 z. .. ZJl '" Ice; ...VI 2 '0.., -$J~' "'....tl ......:'" ~ l . 1!, t'" :! ...-- (J ,,~'c4.~ "'~ ISO ~ ~>.w ~ .o'!' ~i~A/ ~,~ I' . ""~4 ~" ,s '.- ~ : 11 ~ ,.!.. ';-'-~---'; .... ~. ...-.5 0 ~-:-'h "'~ a~ :. t ~ \:~; 1Il" \ ~,,, ,w:~~:~.."O'i) .r,o:-, r 'i' E '~4-:" ,~ I' ..I~ ~ "::....,. <> ~. ~ · Q. , .,~. '~\O'l I' ",rl~ '~'" ~.., -", ~_.,.\l '\.....:'-"r; ; ...._'---':?I~. ~ ';;.:.~ 4 c IS,:" ~ so, -. ~.~'O ~ ~o.p.,," ~ t 1l. ,~... ..,.. II ~ 10 ~,. ~ ," ..0 14900' 3:. ___.- ~ ~. .. ~ '~I 'I'~' ,\,,,,_ ..'1~, 4 'h" .....'!.,..' 4 '9~\..:9~~".,:8 =--la~1-- '. ~: :"-9~"l 3..~tJ S~~~~?'~'f~ .';~ .-Q.t.,t ~. .' ~o,.. ~~: :..."l.'f'\pN.W/~.;''':I'':,:;.''q .~.-~--~--. <l"'ou)oC..:l''co~~''; ~ > M^"" .7._ WOo. I", S" .... &r.:4S4Bt-lQ'i1"l\ ~'~\'L~~ I _-~~I, . ~.;~'" ;-i~;~ <t,,~ ,o~ .~~fl ~ttY~' "-o._11r.i..';.f ;7~'Jwi'-"~'~'~'T:r~~-t5'!"r':" ~!.. F_L4!i--...... ~ :..-...-,:--~ .',," '~"'1''''. :;;:::11' "'-Il . 'S 0 ,-.,,'" '" ,.!i'" 'i';':;' ;0 "':' I' · /1, "t.. rTt4f:Z ,; ::;. ,~~ .. - .. ~ .:;~.IO, .. '0/" ~,';' '41.1 .... " it ~. 1)0 ,,+ ::'7.~..t.. 1:;' ._-~_ !Jf-'f--,; ":'!,!''' . ...1~"-.<' . ~.~. 10 J1E:i.n-i-"~ · ...-.-.---1 .. ,..,. ~. !~'!';,~,.t. ',E -lIi~ ~~ \. 14 .'S'-- ,. :i ~ ".tot , ~ 7. ~ '." . '" . "" ;: IS ..... 4 i 5 ":l"'. :0'" 01", '" . "u___.f ,~. '~,'l"'i: '1"'7.... -~ ~ ~..~'Im ol;-.-......I:!~ --"'--! ~ ~ . . ~i?:, ;-.;,'" ) ~ ..,- --~1~\---')-~l!~J.-rl---~~>>~'''''''' 1!"..1:~~ .~., ~'\'I'4 4 ~ki!:5;e. 14 ~ f-~~ ~~ ~"':N~~ ~ .... I~~~. 13. ,"0, ......8 . A:s=--.;:y "'~~.J". 1%1'!. Yo! ~'\ << I '\l\ '~3n-jl. ..... 12 ) ',,1 ~ . :-~ ,~\.---~ ~-- -- ~'''-'''-~' "r......~, 0:, ..ft-....~_., ~ - I . 1\ . 'Ii,,,. ."'.-- 0.-....- 4.....ii.~~ ..' ~ 8"";. . L.I 3 'oS' - ;;:"t.,"-'''' 110.. I .. . ~~. 11 ,._"\~1... j , .. "'<1 ~'fi ~ "t;.:':' , \i;' -~.' .; -: ~,.i~ _.ll !,l;;!k.}I,.,~~ . _-;~' ._.';;": ~.\........J.'" I1U~": "".~" "c .... l:\ 1'1 . 1 .~,~" Q .";l~--- ,&\.- --- ~,' 7~'_ .:- 8 ~ ~l' "'::''''I:'~'T..~3 ~ 14b."\ . ~ II >.. '. ..' ~...- -.' .-_..-~..t., ,.~c;" .IZ : . ".'JI' _, <(...~.T,t..: :.a;<i.l.i:f;of'IID ',~J.;,t,~),. ""'\l.,M.!' :,/ ::- fO i i:'.:.... 0 ": ""'t r .5."..:12" &~"....: 1:'''''1'\'' ''1~'l." 11.14: 4:"" b' . \ ~.'.,' ~l.t.", UHf; ~~..... . .,.... 'z. ",. No 1--"11 ~ p: :: ' I' . 1%.1 ".'~ "~i ~~~I .,~:' ~,{~;. ~~~R'L~S.l(~O'~I{ ~,,~ ~0.;S;017 500 '016 6~1 4...cULY~R 4.27 ...BOAOM7 ~4.^1 ~.'7 i "4815 _ '5'H ~ ~~iM~n"J" "'" '. '" ~ ~-".l7 78 ZOl "" ,.77 "'\' ,. J"'U7 17 .". . '. .87 . .'0. .. .. ?4,!'~:'~'h":.''"~'' ....~~' RJ . IS. .:: }'Zc.II. . ,~,_, .: .T''':~ '" }....,! . . t.. 0: _ ;; ." .0 };' _"'.I~ 4\.1 !.... !!!~eC~ I . J A. !:' ::., - 7. all 4; '.;; :: I'~ 1!!. 3 i 4 ~ S ~ ,;; 1 ~ ~"I"- ... \ I.' 0 ~ IO~7.' "",::; · ". ,,- if'~ . ' t.iol./. ~ , ]' 0 ' .. 30.,.... 78 ,jo T7 ,- 11. 8T ,oa 8 ~ 4 . -;.,~/!~ ~cei 0 ;;;01 ~ I '4~"~ ~It. ~ ':;5 N 1 ~ .. i ~ ':.S '" . ~ ,.:~" !l "";7'%0 'W. 5 6 3 ~ ..ll. " ',l.:: ~!:! - <", , It.~. - _ ill . G",,.: . ",,_" _ ,.Z _.3 . . . . 3 ~ ~ I 14" Ifq.oa.:t' ..... .;:., loi., I :;.. T'~ '..- It." 101.'-' .. .. .. .. ..-:" I <6 .%0 5040 $030 502 5010 4950 ",930 "9Z0 4910 4900 ~gS' A~ 4ft ~ .,.. \ ~i+~;::Q,~)'INVIEW (I:;:'.i~~:' l;~~" ,;;" '.~:~:\ m5 4'" ~~,. 490' ~0^1 TE~I1li'CE , SN ":' 4 ~ LtP"" ,. . ," .:1.0. '00, TT~rJli!'; '~.- ~J:;;"~ .,.... \. yo' . :~'~ .L!~"g\ '07.85 . . . '. '. I: ' '4;1' -0 * .....O~'. .,., fI' ~ ol:~~., . 51: ~..... '0 \. . ,"\"." . ',.' '" 12 oG'1\ ~ 10". ~-:"'!.'ife..Or, 1\ ~12l;;. i'!' .. I!! Z 3 4 5,' 7'/ ~r~~o1' "'" ' :..,.,:~.~~~~~.~~~~~,-::~~~~;1"~:"4"','~"~\~': ~~. ~\, ~ ~;.. 18 ,', I'~ '15; 1'4~~ W' , ~-:\'" H'~' a G ~.< " ." ..".... 1 0 ." ~ 8- ,-'\:"', . ". - '~ ., r. 11v~~ "':... 0 ,,;.'....,,; - . . . . . tN$\ . 2755 Jl1.41-~ 144JU" .~ .-"" ~ . 1 -:u.1 101.11: .. . .. .. .; ~ (,..,\. . ~ "~'-&:i..~.~ ,-y>9 ",~~.....,~! 4960 4950. 4920 A,:~Wf. 490vnONA,4m>-.J -:~ J:.~ oo~..~~~ '\ I'-'~ 'ON. . 8 ~ f0.-{~ ~<i'~~Tfk ..- I :.:'1: ~;~: I o.~ .. 86/ <IS. l! ~ ,.:;" ~"....Ii- S. "1. IS' IT ~~~.~ :f"""". ~,*.~"~ ~r.' "'. 4901. · -.7.;... :::' '..~:f :l: . n;; , IS ''i~.. " -~;. ~ ' ~... ... oft .!IF ~~_~ c.~ ,=-!' ,'\; ...:: ,-*_.. ~,,:q,. JP.."~ lO' \ = ..::...t!t.13 ii< -~ ~n.l"" . ~:o ~ _, . ",,, /~,~>... ia-.u ~ 10 .. ........ "" "O'.'''~T:~'<> ~~......~ I', .;>. f~-~ ISMS ~TT'"" IV ~ '.!!.. I 0 ,'I; ...,)\9 .....' <to '!~~;.,~.~~es" A I~,.,.,.!! ZO ~ ~ :! ~ ~ 0 ~.)>..,. 11 -..":" :)..~~~. .. ffOo.1.\.11- ",." ". - ~"'. ~ 2. % 3 ...''If.. ,., .0;..... ... 1..!l:.!;1- "li~ ~ .'t'.I' .. ~ ,. 110. W ~:~""'~IC';-30 ',. I"."~~~.w ' 'f-s;.,&; I ~...7 ..-2 ~."-(b.~. ~ B =:::- 4820 o~ ~ S..l ~ ../iI~OMARI',.IiIO"LANEu;'s":'":'~i"i. 58 ~. ~ t~..~ :e~-:''''', ' I ~l;! . E.-.. - r YV.~ &:;. .It.,,,....; ~ ..~ :::/= 18 '.' ';-0; ~\ . V' :, '~{ tt..: 131.l_ r ~;:i:'0 100 10. d;: I l.s~Q'~ ~ ,:'''~t4 1 '..' Z Z,' ,1. ,.....~[~~... ,"" "\l.':' 5125 r 5055 ~'n~-:l - ~ rg~.f6 ;,...,r4.'~r,!:;.~9,..~ S';;: 7'~''''''''~'3.~~~i;..<>~~4 ::~ "."~~~.'O i 17~ ~~ 13~.1I _ ..... - !: . _- ~ C-4' '" ....v.. _ ," :: '\J ... C\f 7' -,r.r,- - 111.:.:1 0: 2. IOn' "-'100 I^'" 0 t.4.~::; ._. ~ -''tf.IO . .. ,... . \ ~ ~3.' ~;'r-~."~. U, · ':-:iJ' ,';(:;..:. '" I. ~l" " I. ir~g~1I ~ ~IJO.Sl i~~ . !: 51! N.~f,.'7Zo,,:-~.4<:.- ... ~ .'f2C;Y"'. .-~ ~ fij . .-' "!' _ _;.~ " :--:' . ....t: 'M J' .." '1-. <>'.. ).~" .. 0 ~ Z -, ...,... HAMPTON505rFRO f ~ z ~, 21.~' = . ~Tz IS S. a::gt: 12:;:~J:\ ~...... ~ - 5025 ~ ... - .. <f '" e'" a:: '" "," ..,.,,'1 .~":< ,. 110 '0 '~"" ',' ItC . "'::> w II.IO~' ..... \<,:.; 5105.., ."~~'!\ ... 0 . 0. ~ . ~ I. ~:l:'~"1 Z~ S = 4T~",~0.' ~~ 2Z~~"8~13 ~ 14~~$caJ3,2 '" . . il " _. 42J'Sl~"W. .. ."'- . 1-", , .....,_,. ,. 0::; . "0 'CO "..'4 Zc I S.I" jic.~i ....1 II' It. ...1 ,U.'l ! \. " '..Zo.J4Chs. (fDyi -- ..... " -..... "..",.,'" --- . -{ ,,"- 4~" fc.~ ",0,,0 )~ ~~ ~ .r~r...~ ~ ~ot" ,"" {'oil ~~-t . . . Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2700 Regent Avenue North (Map 4) (02-3-13) Evergreen Remodeling, Applicant Date: March 20, 2002 Evergreen Remodeling, representing the property located at 2700 Regent Avenue North, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build several additions to the existing home. With the exception of a garage addition on the south side of the home, these additions meet building setback requirements. The following are the variances requested for this proposed garage: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of between 70 and 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 5.6 feet off the required 13.5 feet to a distance of 7.9 feet at it closest point to the south side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in May of 1957 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . . . r (Revised 1/99) Petition Number O}- - 3- } 3 Date Received 3/ b If) .)... Amount Received S- 0,6) ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: f}~h.. ;}.700 r5~.erd-lfv~nu-€./N. e~rh ~eJuso" BZA Petition Date -.8/5/02- $-uJ) Mill l?d./, -5 /;).~A:z- 'ieeh~, Petitioner. ell IU'tf r -U..n if t-f\{ 0 del/^'}-- , Tn C- ' . N~;efO 0 I).e.)) ptflj- fh;L ed/f),^-- /l1AJ SS12':! Ad1~ess . /lv City/State/Zip- ':LS~ q~~ /L-j~~ q5~ q~/;; /)358 Business Phone Home Phone 2. 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: G{)./U/ a/7cl JoafJn (;-ard n-er I 1l>j-,'h'i711er ;'5 Hl.L 9U}er-td wtrl:nLc#7'. 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Lo-/-& I Jj/OL~ g J fi'(~r A-rit:{I'./-I '0 f) /)awn . /tf!-; r g6 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: ~ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional. Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. . G-ara!jL caf.Jlhim +Ad wi/) In fr;~ rm 'iAe- -:-,/h ya ,Sd bCLU/ r-L~~refl1~d ~ $/- q/~ 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the grantin9 of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs. or otheLevidence, if appropriate. ltffacJ? Lei, , . A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 10. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $50,00 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. 0~~ Signature of Ap icant.. ....... ... .... UNI,..ESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name /)ll1.ev f' #//1"5 Xti:i-7nJ Comment ~~ /7' N-/--V'u~ _~ __'.. .-tt, ,:-'/,~ ~~~ p."..A~.-#J~ ~ Signature '. () .a-.-Y-_ Address 7(" to ;y?,~ ' . . · . PrintName J!l;' .'(?~~'-~';;:~ ct/l.f/e.. c1. s. r-' '.~ . Comment /" .{;; d -€ ~ u.~~ ty. , --------- Signature Address -- 7CJS Print Name Comment L<,~ kJ. 'P-e te + L'Vtdq BeL.L L (l'r: e. Gl Yl 1(:.<:: oel d rliW'-- Signature fJtirjh Address ::J.7'J..o Tkj.,..,f-,1,oe" Print Name-G.h It i:li t'I,v 'I-' Ih ~ ('(); e.l k.. Z,) Comment Yrn ~~ tfuU 'h Q/ ~Y1j ;f) ~~h(~: Signature ttllJX0cgiLL Address Cl}~ ~C4J) ~ tJ . Print Name 't...iy"'~~~_~ 'Cst'> C c"~Y\7 .::\.\&.~ Comment LvY\~'(~';-{~~WJi ('v-~\~~\csnl <.St 'f...c ~-\-\:s ,~.~ V"\~\\\-r;,Y\cr)C'~ Signature~~~~ (k\",j,,,~'f\._~.Y~" Address l.:c;'-\.~ C~:0...c\:\ )~~ t-J Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature . Add ress . . . EVERGREEN REMOpELING,INC. 5800 Kellogg Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952)922-1922 FAX (952) 926-4790 PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY SOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 9, Brief statement of the reasons, necessity or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. We are applying for a variance to the side yard setback requirement. For an existing lot between 70 and 100 feet wide, the side yard set back requirement is 15% of the lot width, In our case, the lot size is 90 feet wide which would require a minimum setback of 13'.6", Currently the setback is 19'.9", The proposed garage stall addition is 12'.0"wide. The garage stall addition proposed would infringe on the setback by 5'.9", The side yard setback after the garage is constructed per plan would be T.9" instead of the required 13'.6". The primary purpose of the garage stall addition is to add additional parking space. The house currently has a one.car garage. With the addition, the homeowners would each have a parking stall. In order to provide adequate width for parking a vehicle, the minimum width that could be designed was 12'.0". The secondary function of the garage addition is to provide much needed storage space within the garage for the lawn mower,bikes, sporting goods, etc. The garage is designed at 12'.0" wide by 26'.0" long to provide the additional storage space requested. The length of the garage does not effect the variance applied for, only the width. Because the house is a split level, there were no design options to accomplish the clients goals other than a garage addition. . Because of the split level, a tandenstall was not an option, nor is . there a possiblity of carving out space within the existing footprint of the house to make room for more garage. . . . . . . . . . . =Ci.~Um_vll~ Y 4-9-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 2700 Regent Avenue North Everareen Remodelina. Applicant Evergreen Remodeling, representing the property owner at 2700 Regent Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition to the existing home. This construction project requires a variance from the following sections of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed attached garage is for 3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 . feet at its closest point to the front property line along Regent Avenue North. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, April 23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. " , . 4500 Chatelain Terrace 02-4-16 . Bernt and Deanna Grotberg . . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 4500 Chatelain Terrace (Map 8) (02-4-16) Bernt and Deanna Grotberg, Applicant Date: April 17, 2002 Bernt and Deanna Grotberg, with property located at 4500 Chatelain Terrace, are requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants are proposing to build a garage addition on to the existing home. This would replace the existing attached garage and would not come closer to the east side property line along Westwood Drive North than is currently the case.. The following is the variance requested for this proposed garage: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed attached garage is for 8.17 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 26.83 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Westwood Drive North. Previously, this property received two variances. In June of 1999, variances were granted for this property for a proposed deck addition on the front side of the home and for the existing home on the east side of the home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. Since the building is being changed the variance granted for the east side of the home is no longer valid. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in November of 1949 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . . . Subject Property: 4500 Chatelain Terrace Bernt and Deanna Grotberg, Applicants -4..... 0055 . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number OJ - if - / b Date Received 1/.),/0"" Amount Received 5 D "W ($50 residential- $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 2. BZA Petition Date f\J',otlcA'h~Yll(Af tIt Y!'2./0'l-- B'LA tl1~ JaAe V/Z'3/o~ , . 3. Petitioner. Be I'll t- ~ D€t'I h 11a.. (; rO +he Y"g.. Name 45"00 t: hClt te '(tin 1erl'Dt-ce &€:.JdRn lIallp!j)n1M Address City/State/Zip fo /2 -75""1- "'(!/ ~q . Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: . 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Lo+ ,} 13 JoC/t. 5) (.,Lf;:NOA LE JLI'fy ~t bc{d;n rJqJle~} I-k: nnep'h (OUilt +1 ) M tl1V1est!/C{ 6. Type of property involved in this petition: ~dential: ~e Family ~ouble Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. . . -, Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. . 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota~ The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shalf be shown, The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of$ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~(\{l of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TOTHIS WAIV . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s)of the. City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible .effectthe granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property. will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. . (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name :T CI /fA e So jf. 0 c> /tI1 A.l J3 L ~-:I:~?~ v~/v-Qcf! / / 4/[ CJ C;) CJ ,1/ -_.. Signature/~~~ f/-./2~./ Address .// I ( Print Nk~ ", "'""'''-" '" ~~ '\ ",,,^ _ Comment .?/ IJ 'I/~~~, L/. Comment Si9nalu~ ~ At;fdress rr-O \ (' k~ \C\\C",~ fr . Print Name WI / t 11-">;yl (tJ_ GL+c:)" E2 .. .. Comment ..-j -. ; -U!- =::i:::-:- Si9na!0:.~?~d>~ l 'kt-r~ Address fS/l~~ I.e/(flJ Print Name Comment @(,t-l- cPf t1A vtlf-, ~ Le if Signature . . . SURVEY FOR: Mr. Steve Lenius :Jim !J(y'W t7 :::IIuociaw. {f nc. PAOFE~ALLANOSU~EVORS AND LAND DEVE.LOPMENTCONSUL TANTS (612) 421-9126 13621 VINEWOOD LANE DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 3, GLENDALE, City of Golden Valley, Hennepin County, Minneosta. o Denotes Iron Monuments ~/1~€.'/'''= ZQ I B I r K PlDD./ f~."f ~ ::7~Tc l<' x-y-....r::.-. ~/ J4/ Y /Va. 5S x e;P'- _ lfi,.I../1II01 Clilc II""J' >>0.55 - /&>o.c<::> _ (,) I r-~- l( 0 I . m ~ -L DUft"hra..l U+;li+} LilolU ( ="&dseme"'! ''I toe N.. /0" 72 , I o \I I.. ~ ~ I~ tJ ..... '- ~ C/wJ" l il\Jc. )</ :it . .ft."''' 7- '" --.... ( ~ I ./ 0 / Qf.""t-- 1 (J.t:> ,,'" %.8.'. #0 (,,1$ ~ -# /-5"0 0 IS'Z.S Q 9 .; /It.. IS" '" l~ ...5'; 'Z.':',53 -- ~ " 0.., 11 \. ~ 1$''1r I:l:l tI a <b'HS ~e ~ ,,(1I"'('re/~ a;'f~ I::! ' Or1tle " ---..", ---'<- '\ " /,S'.,i "- \..1 ""-, ,~ \ ~Jk''''1 \ ( tIll1ltl,r/ e~ ~/ //p.&> -- 80' t::> Q (',1..crcle ~....'( l, ,-<l. CLl/?r€~4/AI ~~n'~~ ct!:_ DAYTON, MN 55327 \ \ l, " !WI \) \ I .. .. ... 1: III I:.. o I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and a duly Licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Dated May 8, 1~99. By , ,Minnesota, License No. 12267 . ~ ~ ~ \J \J <;) ~ t ~ ~ . ,".. <.~' I _....._,...._~ . tj ,'il .: ~ J:j !;: !.;:,. .. , . i:l H ,. -~\~-- I ...+~._-.....,.._.,___.._'___m r ;"w("l'H..I:' ~j .. ;..,..'.l';:i .;'.{/;.; . . ~, ~~;. ~'" . :.:-::"~ .:.;,:... ~-.---- "r-'-'--. 1 ' , I . , ,:_t+1 f 1 .i'I'l,. ",' ~:::.' ',i';: ( n f:3,:;1 .. Ii L. ; ~'t " .~ ; t. >(:ri)t:':-j7 //1' o ,- ,'J .;.. ...,w.' ._ Ji i-j I 1 l- V I A;; ~' ';: ,,- ;. "2(,,8 ~' IS.ct' O'(i t.XI!>TIt.l~:~. ....... ,....- ..~. .:,.' \~~.- .:.; ,;'j " i i. ...._..., .... ! .... '.;.. ,"J:.' ....c.'. '. "ft =~ o ui tl' ~ ~ l"l l\:1 :i\.. . (if.- :\l:t.. '(t~ ( {I ".4..''{ '''-'', ..'- ~f~~_:..~:-~::~::J~~.~__......__. _.=~~..__~=i~~~Z~f~~-L_~~. ~~4:~_ I .., ;.'('.'':''1" .--._ "___~____ --:_._..__.~_.":1"''''' (:i-':l:r.i.ty lh~iL 1 !iI''}' d i l'~".; (.". L b:,' Dd:: or un(;;:;t- und~r tht:'. 1,:~:ds g"ur-\reY:J1:- " . ,J :.'" .j" '., !. .,f Lf:(:S0 .\",'i:!S D::;::: f1ar e d Lh t.!] SH!..\.'C-Y . . '. "'?J~().i.."e_~si~\n2L Land l..Ji.ce(~$I:;t.i _~~ _ ;,f'ii :1 d...dy Dat(~(,i 1999,- t.j;:! ~Ol: d. ".;; ~"~ ,-) ....... -: . . \\':\ I , I" ;-, \: S II pe rv'Ls.l. ;:';Yi. I) 1: L l! (~ ~} ~~ a t (; Y/z-/oz- To I-.vhollV\ If J'Vta'f) ttJl1CR r(J: Be YI'l f ,;' ~an nOt- [01?:J the''3 wow / J /, i:; e d-1.... i/qYltrnce ,raafpd . r CU< v jJYop(!JsCJd 2 C C1tr far-c1Y cl f Ys7JO C/ta/e/q,y; 7;Pn'ctc--e-. the.- Y',K/5';'hj / e. r rya~ /qU5 Wt'sfwOP'/ Oplte (E~<') aVIf;1 due f-o ~ .f"deLL ",,f' IN dr{'Vew~~J we Wflttld lite. -1-0 rrlCfct II WI!h PL 2-Cc,j,- ,4c,h~ CMa/-el6if'r- . the C-IAI/r'ttvt ~r-pt~ /5 2&.8-3 ~f, ,L;-oYVt Oi4V Ea.$ f [JYOf?fy!3 Jlrvu- aVic! ./hPl-f d($frtY)<<.- kVlA1d nt/I chPlI1~~ lve. tvOf/t Id /1/4e 10 jYil1?'~ tkrfdfh. Iv 30 I In s #?ld t9~f4e It, zs- I If /5 (fA. rft~~ ct f. -r1 _ /,+-1_ .? f/q r I t>t 11 U i'5 t) 6 /t1 :v, I he::;. If'Ll /v'-t{th, vea50n f-rpy r~~lAe51--(~.5 I Y'.fC . J t'l '1 Ca v 'Yd"'fY- ft;v,t f WP/4 Ie! Iw 1/ e "- 5 q /!e :; y.ul e d n lie i<J<l11' n..., @/1..ev- V<QSO/!1 /5 ~f iNe Vvt/lAld /t/Lc. /71? hrl~ !titS howse;0 to I/l h V' JM. tJ:; WI '-/-1. fhe. tJ IN v h (p f4 ryt 5 n1 --/ke ct f"< P\- 4. t/ltt:l 10 Yl ~ . .htv il/fs _ lfE)ol ChC4/elct,M... /fJr~Clc.e dl-veJ~ k the 5outJ,) A- 6-( S Ct 2- t! 4 v fla V ^ ~e ~ c { h 'i C ha Ie I b. h. I t e:. / +- 0../ {a t1. ~ ../ 0 h. IPL- Co y /L.t. ~ &? as we c:{ re." ! M. ~c-I a II O'? fh.e- h' 0 '. ()y\ 6Glr n€r I I. . t-1 ~ 5 it'i/[ clzCl te (a d.., ulte~~ f) L' brs (lor ntJf) ~ye Wi-fh... 4v,lJevvt'{:;5 C1//ltl r/rcrr~ ~C:'lha CVlOd.e 1ft ,h.. ::J J) fA /-77 fh.e ?:; f -h_ . d fk j1v; f r:>t# ' e c- / nq t (JlAr ~r~~ /;v.:t S Jf.t![I1.' i)'\ 0(, +- t'hx- 2i., .~3 PI, h---Pvvt .-Jhe lY-ofJev~ h~ IVJsko..d 0;:' ~ 3ff' Pf } t.v~ ?ued Po.- V.rYf" Y/u t;y 4.'1/L~ 'J"M:JP erI/15;"'h a.....cf 4:-e I ~(?L f fh 15 IN () (,.i (J b r 1h.J /he. h& fA. S fL I hI-v ~ '"i ~ n"1-1 L 13 i-(/ ,!-it ~ }/i'fkhoI"lVJj ht)C1.~$.. Wt &?t()t) ke-/ {hctf ob!?1(t-1I/17 q 2.c~y {jerrq'je ~ (( /1 ~ Cha. f.e { 6( I M..-- "v 0 fA / J bi! Clift!. /, hJ 4 Vl- A fhe U1 &-0 I- ?o s f- e ;:'fed( ue hvv us. /IV t a/lv,f C if;, fe 4~( C'/ f-l f,t:''l'~fe 7 tP~r' ""l/.,jJY<Pv"",, I. . 1ha""t 'J~j,.< J , 13-f "VJf ,'" DeCO? Y1~ bjzJ ~ rs ' I' ~. It .I t::~ I <1,- ~- ...) \l.I~ l~ I ~.1 -9 1-:- ~ ... \U J~ ~I 149 ~~ \.WuI ::J::.t ~~ ~I ! II I sl J Z I I ~l i !It ~! I ~j 51 I-' ~l I fit :z l3 .,r.. ~ ~ :;l 1{ \-'l ~ 1 ~~~13 ~ ~ :l lli ~;J~~ :I ~ ~ ::t~~J 4ili:{!! " j'/Jl1sf~ ..Oi5l I ..... I. II ~ iJ ~ oD ~ ,0;<;>:; l.l$flq ,O,ZI .P;~ ~ r , " IJ o -;. o .3' -I 1i i ~ q '" r~.1 .J l <:l ";~-::" ,....- z" ~ ~~ u.1 I j""' , e ~ 5 ~ :5 'ti ~I -!F ~ u: ~'9 ~ -et " . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting June 22, 1999 Page 2 \ ~ose: ',,- · 5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 30 feet for a proposed enclosed front entrance, extension of an existing garage and for a proposed garage addition facing Harold Avenue Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback for: · 9.1 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5.9 feet fo proposed garage addition into the east side yard setbac. :1 ,.j ., i! To allow for the construction of a 12 foot wide garage a aition onto the existing garage. ~ ! i! j j U i ;! ii q :\ :1 'i 'I :J l :! i I il ~, i~ ~l ~l u ~ Chair Swedberg re Oold stated that the ap 'cants had presented a variance request the May meeting which had been reviewed and de~ed by the Board. She indicated ththe applicants were given three months'to return with all alternate plan. Oold told the ard the Ruble's have now submitted another garage Pla~a, second garag~ stall t t would infringe mostly into the east side yard setback area. S~e~dicated that the ne plan would enclose, the front entrance into the house and enlarge't~e garage to th ront by 5 feet. Lang asked the applicant if he had con~red "ending the garage to the rear rather than the front. Ruble responded that extending the'g "age to the front was the easiest option since there is a deck and patio in the back. ,J' ~ ' Shaffer asked if the plan had been r:, ie~~d bya ~fessional to determine how the roof lines will be constructed. Ruble state f 'at a professional 'ci,awing has not been done. He indicated that the roof line ma /tleed to be rebuilt and th"at., they will not pursue this option if it proves to be unworkable or; "rohibitively expensive. Shaff~~tated ~hat he ~as concerned that the plans are some at vague and the Board would be aRprovlng a variance for a structure when they ar: not clear as to what the structure will 10 "like when completed. Swedberg stated th the Board would tend to look favorably on a" roval of the variance but .. the applicant ne to provide a more definite plan for the structure. \"" .. Ii II ii ~ 'I " " I l ! I ! I , I ! ! MOVED b haffer, seconded by Polachek and motion carried unanimo Iy to delay action on the requ ted variances for three months to give the applicant an opportunity to seek ' profes anal assistance in finalizing the design. 4500 Chatelain Terrace (M~p 8)(99-6-16) Stephen A. Lenius Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback for: · 12 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 23 feet for a , proposed 12' x 20' deck off the front of the house; and . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting June 22, 1999 Page 3 · 8.2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distcmceof 26.8 feet for the existing house at its closest point to the front property line facing Westwood Drive Purpose: To allow for the construction of a deck onto the front of the house. Chair Swedberg read the requested variances. Stephen Lenius was present. Dold stated that the applicant is proposing to construct a 12' x 20' deck on the front of the house which would infringe into the front setback area. She stated that one of the variances is for the existing house at its closest point to the front property line facing Westwood Drive. Dold added that the steps that go along the house are not considered part of the structure. Mr. Lenius stated that the house currently has no sidewalk access to the front entrance. He indicated that a designer had suggested that a deck be added to the front of the house which would pro\(ide access to the front entrance as well as expanding the living space. Lenius indicated that there is a deck on the rear of the house but it is somewhat unusable due to the shade and the noise from Highway 55. Shaffer asked how the twelve foot width was determined for the deck. Lenius responded that he felt that eight feet was not wide enough to provide a useable area. He added that ten feet would be acceptable but that he felt a twelve foot width was the best option. Lang stated that the narrative provided by Mr. Lenius states that he has restored the house to . the look and feel. of the early 1950s. Lang. questioned if the proposed deck structure will be in keeping with maintaining the 50s look. Lang also stated that Mr. Lenius had provided a list of homes in the neighborhood that utilize the same idea he is proposing for his entry. Lang commented that he had looked at these homes and that in all cases the front area was not used as a living space but as a decorative entry area. Lang stated that he was concerned with approving a variance from the front yard setback for the proposed structure when it will be used as living space. Lenius asked if reducing the width of the deck to ten feet would make the proposal.more palatable. Lang responded that he felt the problem was that the area would be used as living space. Swedberg stated that one of the factors considered in approval of variances is that there be no other viable alternative. Swedberg indicated that the applicant has a large backyard which already has a deck. Swedberg stated that front yards have the greatest impact on the neighborhood and it is the responsibility of the Board to balance the needs of the applicant with the best interests of the neighborhood. Sell asked about the height of the deck floor. Lenius responded that the deck is 10 inches off the ground. He added that the deck wall is 2 to 2.5 feet high. Sell stated that if the proposed structure was 8 inches off the ground, the homeowner would not be required to obtain a variance. Lenius stated that the goal was to have the deck floor even with the front door. threshold. He stated that he felt it would reduce the attractiveness of the structure to lower the height and have a drop from the front door threshold to the deck floor. Lenius added that his contractor indicated it would be hard to engineer a structure eight inches off the ground. He. stated that if the structure were to be eight inches off the ground it would. be better to go to a concrete slab and build the wall around the slab. Sell stated that there is a trend toward . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting June 22, 1999 Page 4 people adding front porches and making more use of their front yards. He added that it makes sense for the applicant to use his front yard due to the location of Highway 55 along his rear yard. Sell stated that the use able property in the backyard is only approximately 25 feet due to the location of Highway 55 and the easement, which is approximately 30 feet. - Polac~ek stated that the proposed structure provides more of a decorative design than a useful design. He stated that he would be in favor of approving the variance. MOVED by Polachek, seconded by Sell to approve the variances as requested. There was further discussion regarding the motion. Swedberg stated he was concerned with the intrusion into the front yard setback. Lenius responc;led that the deck will have a low profile and he felt it would blend well with the house. He added that he felt this provided an aesthetically pleasing addition to the home and access to the front door. Shaffer commented that it is a substantial intrusion into the front yard setback but if the structure had no wall the applicant would not need a variance and he could still create the same amount of living space in the front yard setback. Lang stated that he was opposed to allowing the variance since the structure will be used as living space. Sell responded that the applicant could lower the deck floor by two inches and create the living space without obtaining a variance. Shaffer stated that he would vote to approve the variance as requested but would suggest to the applicant that he consider the possibility of a brick patio. . Following the discussion, the motion was amended as follows: MOVED by Polachek, seconded by Sell to approve the variances as requested with the restriction that the deck floor be no more than 10 inches off the ground and that the deck be Constructed in a manner comparable to the drawing provided by the applicant including a wall that extends no more than 30 inches off the ground with a deck surface that is even with the threshold of the house. The motion was carried. Lang and Swedberg were opposed. Mr. Lenius stated that he would keep aesthetics in mind as much as possible as he proceeds with the proj~ct to make certain the Board does not regret their decision. // /' /' r from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A).rF"ront Yard Setback for: . 5 feet the required 35 fee~~~istance of 30 feet for the proposed ~. tt7st point to Westwood Drive; and Waiver from Section 1 t~1 Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback.for: 617 We Michael ood Drive South (Map 17) (88-6-17) er Request: . . . 7.6 feet off the - quired15leet.!..0. a distance of 7.4 feet for the proposed ached garage at itS"'Olosest point to the side (east) property Ii . . . . . . He wwm d. golden-valley, mn. us Y 4-9-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 4500 Chatelain Terrace Bernt and Deanna Grotbera. Applicants Bernt and Deanna Grotberg, with property at 4500 Chatelain Terrace, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct a garage addition to the existing. home. This construction project requires a variance from the following sections of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed attached garage is for 8.17 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 26.83 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Westwood Drive North. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, April 23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. \ \ . 5360 Lowry Terrace 02-4-17 . David Raley . . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 5360 Lowry Terrace (Map 3) (02-4-17) David Raley, Applicant Date: April 17, 2002 David Raley, with property located at 5360 Lowry Terrace, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant recently moved a previously constructed home onto this property. After the home was moved, an as-built survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the home does not meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicants to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a certificate of occupancy for the home. This was done only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless form is attached. Below is the requested variance: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home is for .024 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.76 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Lowry Terrace. It is unclear from the city's records when the home was built. No other pertinent information was found in the file. ;,.' . Subject Property: 5360 Lowry Terrace David Raley, Applicant . y. ~ . f . , . 'A' l!:.. !.._lC 6' I~ ' ~.,' ...\ .... - ," }oj'. ..' \!> 7 l<:. 10 l!: ?,J _~t~~ 'P ~~'~O 9 ~le'a! ~ ~ ~5:; I:'" ~ .:;: ~ ':l .. .. ~ Z . ~ -; .'-~ "':.. '~I"", ~K' :,: '1~~ · 21 20!!! 19~ Ie! 17! 16= '~' 'l(,~ 13~ ""'2 ", 11~' I '''I. ~ "~"':; u~t ~ .~ ,- :; \ . 8~'~ . . l- II . . .. -. . _;; ,. 111.' Ii "'f ~ y .. (01 '\ . - 9 " !.~ . IE> 2.. 15.l< :<: ~;; h -.. ... Jj ~I ;:: ~t"~ -m ,,' '~ : I ~ . ~ .~It II~ rilO^.... ~ . '4 '- 2 II 4' 5' 6' T' .. 9 10. l2?lL.....: ~ , . ..' . ". . I' ..;... If 12 I! '" ~~. It' ~ 4 J. III 19 . C '" ~ ,j~ 22 21 20'~ 18' 17' 16' 15i 14 'W-"~l~ . ; "."12 . . 4 ~ 12 ~~ if . ../ \C..J/I.1S . II . , .... ,. ,,'" " ;rjI' r _ J. - . 5 6 , i~ 34 1/2 PLACE N. .a :'\i1':/ ~~~~~ ; 1'> 7 = 10 = ~ .~ .. . - -.. '..f:: ":l! 1&.;.. ~~~ ~ ~. ~ ..' t- . 25 J'" 2ll 22' 21' 20' 19 C ~ 17 ;; ~ih~~~DD.'o 14 .:i. 7~'~ l'I3f~ ,,~... ~I "~'4 ~ C. ~ ~ 1 -......, ~_ 15 "i'5 ~" IU.Z"'Y -.-:1\ ':" . .. .",,,rslh'" ", f '" 11 ~ Jo.[ :!A-j .. ~ to ~.--~",--~- -: I 7.. - I. .~l~ ."'.~ 1 ..Illl.1 II :! 'OD 'iJ'HL liD 'Ne~_4 6 '\I' ;:. -~ . -or f't.r la Ja ":".~'ft;~ .- .. "rt'. i w'/I:~ 1il1.~",:e~.t,. 5" I~. ru,:~' . ~ ,:.1\.111 ;;"'~'E[ Off ....". "."6 ....6. 43_ l!. 2 .'~~f~""\ . ,.... . Ft J1 o T AV~- . .!i---, ~. . -.!~oI",,,,,,'d~~ ~ III .~." '-;;-;}f!L,!L .lo~ '''ro..." ....~~1Y.4.. .... . ~ lil1....... .... \t.. N~ "... . . "'.41 I. lOJ ,.. "1'U1: II, "":;,..p . I'. - ~ 2.- IS ~ A .. I ; ; ~ . · i :'I"";" <. P'"i>. 4 ~ ~TOf'LOT ~ I -- 11 ..0\0(\ ! ~:?; ~.:;... . I.J.. ". J" 4 i II AIDD Tl -:. =~-~1-f1~. J! -;:~~,~ .-~ ~ ~ ~.~ Z1-:I:; * Ii>-- ".' .~. :\ ~.,...;: ~ = Jo[. 1m...' to ~(';-: ~.~'" ~ . R; IJ \o-:.~i~..~o'i" '2, I c.ll -~'oj~.8...~ ~ . /(OZ ':C:"'~:.'(~~ft:; " . l . " IIl.iL. ..~~;,. _ ; I."" LI... PART HG LOT S tjO. ~I!!!~. . ~N' '. '~:.M"~~~./ 2M: "2 It -~ 'iI ~ '2 ~~ I. · ~Fl J . ~~'NGEMEtlt~~.) ~ LOTS~ ~"'~~U5,IE ANDI7?~ .~ ~. :l! '" ~~ · .n",_o..~ "./ I 4A . . ~ ~:" ... I '''' . ~.: . ~ '!. f t Port of L UI.1Z O' ~'; --.-;..;;,j(-.... u, ~ ~ . I~. " .' . S ~ ./6'0 e'" ,- : ..~. i:: l .~ 3 ~ ~ if .. '\IIALE II :;ff~. .. ," .J1t". :.. LOT 16 &...~...,' ~,.~.... {.-.J::". ~: ..!!~ .....~.. "~ . I~. (oZ. ;l~" ..~ la '(.z. . ... G:J '60 .... .~ JJC;,: 100 Irj ... \ Ill: l:i I~~ I.. ... J '~..,..:f.&J:-"t...-'- "'. - _~!!r!... - - _ .:... ~~ ......__"'", __II<;- _ _ ~ -u~7r,iYl7- --". - =tif.) ~ t:';:.. -~ "': ~/..IZ~'" -~. OI.!)""--- ~ -----:..t.O.JU..'1-UQI'.:==....-:: ____.zw.. , C( OJ '" li ~ . is.'' "1"1; ... 2"S Itn. j,~ t40 :.. !' "2: . ._..... n. LOT 15 ~ ~...2 GARDEN~':~ i ~ HOMES~H l. ... : ~ '" ~_w.:-__ ~ L.n.SZ ' .. (I~ ,~.II, '". ,;". . .. ,2< -~ IU "': riJ ~ I . \ 4-'. LOT 14,~' :~T-I'r.'1- iI-.E.l.. I' '."C : .\~. \R'2~.ij~!.?"'~~=_~ ~~. 20...."n.R\vt'\!~"l~;;' '" 118;.... ,~& .~.. I.. ~. GOU~~n .;< :l!:r"'ItJ& .. 112" · is I .g;;: Q i ~. '1l-m----- I-I ~ "-' ~ m-" ';rr II ,.' ~ :l! I -, . ..... '. ~ ~;:.r~ "". d~~ ~'-~~ _ ~ _ ~#~ .=~,. ~ f/. ; . ~,'~~ ~ ' ~ :.,-~----~ ~ . . _~ G' . ~.!i. .' · 110 '. 'j : ;::! ~-"l7i-.':= -"i;. ~;:;; ~. ";-"'e "'-lj" ;;:.,.. 11&,..... ~~ ..:,~4 --"~:4-.~ ;', t:". ~ ~ . I . ~r;~ ~ ~ R W.W RMSBECKED .....~&;.....~~1'JI;:i!~~l1!4 S..r,.t,U'''", . I ......~.!. ;;::::-.~~'-.~~--io.'... .4.... "= ~~ .:N~&~ll.;;...~ .i!'1 .tlij~,... ~,.. I 0 ~;;;4 ,......"t":=o:;~ : 31~ 2.,~.''S:i~Ai' '.08" """~ "".;s j '\ ~.po~"'\ ::1"~60 ..~o ,,~~ J D..Dn tC?f;4 ~fi.D;l~!!.: ,<:, ~<r"'4~. . . 14:~UJJJ -.'1('1'. "",..: 4':'..-;: "1.... ':':_ll!_l_._ II l. ..J .~....v _ -'Suo ~:li\"''''v "'zz~ -<t."IV. E"""ZO I<( j~~"ozz_v ....::..___ ........".- -". wcs ..~ ....... ...,0"- .- ;:""<:::- zn.' .----Z773.78 fi'es. _.... :f\=-4'z~~ ,.. o D 0 ". ~: 0 .'0 !~ 1041 h ~~. ~Ia.~. 00 M.. 'V' . \ , -.----"'7"\.-~'" -----,_'J :. C A.."U.J ~ V:;! : ~ 23 ~ ~ ~.'-~Ill' 5W1, I~. ~, o o - .. ~ 5,"'54'101; 5""" O. ~ ,. 5.1"51' W. ~ In.,t - l!: ;; l>i - ~ TS! ;i22= . . . l-i lr:' ~1f ~ I7fh,_I~1 If! - ~ . 1S ~ - 0 .. ~ Z ~2ll' ! 7S I-a IS .~. . .' ;;26 .::! - <( ;:) Or- ". . -e 12 :. 'Q~~CI ," . . . . . a --)-- ~m~ 115 ~ l~!.4. 2: ~: _Jii '1:\.. . .., "f' --------:~. . '!" ~ +4.. I E ~ fREAR ..:::__~.___~ fr~. Industrial . Other . . (Revised 1/99) . Petition Number tJ).. -I.( -/7 Date Received 3 /~ 1/0 t- . Amount Received S-D. 00 ($50 residential -$150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: \j:3t,c/ ~~ 2. BZA Petition Date tJ ~,-~a4- Na~3g'd ~ ::/~ Address City/State/Zip 7&.l- '7t? 7- ,'?d9 t/'P- ---:?~~ _, p-yf/ Business Phone Home Phone 3. Petitioner: 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): 0-'3CCJ rkI'/CJ.~ . 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: vSingle Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Commercial I nstitutionaJ Bus. & Prof. Office . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. . V~~~.~ 3" A> - ~ ~.~ 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ()(hd~ Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If ona corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name ~l'}f - (~ U ~Ci ~ b ~ '( . k,S u ~ Comment Signature ~ Address S3 ~ 4 '-Ol..)"{ 1t4r~ c p c Print Name . Comment Signmure ~r . Mdress 53/0 Print Name lI~/k.v Carn-??///?;'/V ~~f6.>/~r;01/7 flql''; ~ LD~ r--... Ie {rq G-- C" ", l//C=: h Comment Signature /it":-"?-::.~ _ Address 3re>o ('i/-c<: 12,..;"''<< AI- ~ <:1' j:. Ses,J'""'/c,/? <T-o/dse-/1 v~//t':t.Y /rlN.:'j~--y, PrintName ~ <>i-&rla.... 3a1o-c^-~j Comment . "\...\- Signature ~-~. Address ~\& tJ L,. \~c- ~r-llv'--L . . Print Name 00letfL & ~/rJa /1 Comment Print Name Sa. f\ d t; mOD fQ.., Comment Signature ~~9- '(Y\~.....I Signature .d~~ . Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment: Signature Print Name Comment Signature . Address S5CoO l uwry fer . GoldfJ/1 Vc,(.II(y MtU n-q~ Address 5315 '?JQr~ ~ ~ Address 6j1)c:::.I~ Address Address Address . 53Co )o0/Y Street Address ,./,' 7 er /tio-A- "HOLD HARMLESS' I, .iJ~ · . ,am reque5~l1g the City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) ~c./ #:/cLJ.P onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the varianCe is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. . !lJtJ/d ,f ;($e?, ~)Rt4 Signature J' ; if <J -efl.2/ Date rrJfhA 0 k City of Golden Valley Staff Signature . b300 t.j....'iL't</'\l /1 l_i,.';"'J..;.::/. ~;"--' DESCRIPTION: Lots 4 & 5, Block 1, R.W: WORMSBECKER ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. LEGEND: o . 858.00 . Denotes set iron pipe Denotes found iron pipe Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes existing surface drainage N Bearings are based on an assumed datum. Scale: 1 inch = 30 feet AS-BUlL T SURVEY For: DA VID RALEY ~ ~ ~ ~ Wi i IV D:I:J:I.J.J- I:. N 89"59'33- E - 110.00 (/'kIt) 856. 7 110.00 (/'kIt) .... 859.0 857.21 "- 858./ Found 1/2" 109 80 (M--'J Found 1/2" - - - I · 857.:.- 858.9 ap... /rrIn. N 89:SS'25- E ~ Iron. \ .857.9 t I ".,. 'i / I 857.1 I ".,. .. I ".,. L..VI ~ LeVI ..,. L.VI J ~ 858.06 852.2 861.6 8!S8.4 . \ 24:1 Con_t. III :ill: I:ilI: I :ill: DrlwWtly q Grtrag8 '" . . :ill: :ill: 10t - GA!Ji69.;F~ j~l:< ~ t :" t~ :to .... 861.6 01 :a l.1 ~ 01 ::'f' ; ,,:to ~~ a1 PICi "lOP 857.4 ~1Ci ~~ 858.49 O:g ... 857.5 g ~ ~ g24.16 laD 01 0 IQ :g 0 0- !OJ t po: 0- - 0 :e: 861.1 ~ 867.5 4.lI;;e:e: 22.6 ... :e::e: 1:U 4.6 857.4 .. III Eidtrtlng Hou.. .J 86/..1 ~ EId.tmg H_ r.,1.,... Jo.2 16..1D -- !'l t Story.. 860. 7 I 1 Story ~.;) ...., .. ...... '" LOllE'ST R.OOR l\I LOIl6T R.OOR Gtng8 iC .. aeV.- 854.110 867.6 mv.- ~~: GAR. R.OOR-862.0 86/.6 86/.6 862.0 II) 16.24 8!S9./6 27.:1 .14.6 ~1 2D.1 862./ 861.6" 86/.6 \ 86\,.2 I Bft,u::'~ S I t I!I ~ t I js \ FoUnd 1/2" S 89'58'05- W t Ii: 8- I 669.72 q,... Iron. 8!S7.6 110,11/M-m) (56.0 --- .... 110.00 (/'kIt) _ 859.87 858.85 868./~oncnt. Curb - N SOW'OO- W 857.88 8!S7. 74 - t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~O"'RY -...,,;;; FE./UUCE CERTIFICA TlON: DR41M11 ay: KMM PROJECT NO: 1095.10-101 CADFILE: Base. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct survey of the above described property and that it was performed by me or under my direct supervision Bnd that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. That this survey dOes not purport to show aI/improvements, easements, or encroachments to the property, except es shown hereon. ByQ Merila - Oliver & Associates ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 2781 FREEWA Y BL VD., SUITE 120, BROOKL YN CENTER, MN PHONE: 763-533-7595 FAX: 763-533-1937 REVISIONS: 3-14-02 SPOT ELEVS Date: 3- Ig ~ 02.. . . PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES . . . . lle www.ci.golden-valley.mn. us Y 4-9-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 5360 Lowry Terrace David Raley. Applicant David Raley, with property at 5360 Lowry Terrace, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant recently constructed a new home at this address. After submitting an as-built survey, it was discovered that this home requires a variance from the following section of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home is for .024 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.76 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Lowry Terrace. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, April 23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. '" 11 . 5380 Lowry Terrace 02-4-18 . David Raley . ~ . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 5380 Lowry Terrace (Map 3) (02-4-18) David Raley, Applicant Date: April 17, 2002 David Raley, with property located at 5380 Lowry Terrace, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant recently moved a previously constructed home onto this property. After the home was moved, an as-built survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the home does not meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicants to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a certificate of occupancy for the home. This was done only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless form is attached. Below is the requested variance: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7{A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home is for .06 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.94 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Lowry Terrace. The home at this property was moved from 1645 North Lilac Drive in Golden Valley. The City's file on that property reveals that a permit was pulled in April of 1953 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. , . Subject Property: 5380 Lowry Terrace David Raley, Applicant II .",' V"".",. \ i!> ;;;, 4 't ~.' - ~~. ~-=-- -:- - -1'3Y-~ 23 ::i '.V y~ iii f0- e ".J. ~ t: 5.!5 c I~-~l; ~ = <0 :;;~ I 4:( f- ~ i.< ~'A" _. 6 lC 6 I! :..- .. ~., . .\ .. .~ "I ~: ~, . ~ ,. .1'.' " i J _,~ ~~ ~ ~''i0 9 :: It~ ~ ~ 1= ~ ,:.,,'~ . ',;.. ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~'lf,~ :r;'IZ .;,.... 'i\~ .:: !eVE~' 11 . ~ ""'. -:.". . ~ ~'. ",,~ eL(.~. ~ I.;: ::.f- " . ~ -. i ,. ",." Ii <r !l"" ~ IS . ....:~ ~ '~.~.":! '; I' ~ ~ ~. I~'~ ~ Z' I 4' 5' 6' 7' e' 9' 10:: "%9.11. ~ . ~ f- . -..... .~~IZ~"'~~1 ~ 4 III 2O.~19 C . ~ '" ~~,.. ';5 ,"C"" IZ Z' ZI Ie, 17' 16' 15~1'" 'f:.~...~~.,. .~ 'v~12 J ~ _ ~ .... : ~ . ,. /' '1Z1.l~ ... ... ~ .... ,e ..1_:. al" . /"_ . It 1 5. '~ II '.~ 34112 PLACE N. >8 "~'f (~:{~~1I ; r >> 7:! 10 ll: - ~ . .... "'75.;1&/.~~. ~), ~. ~ .. ~ ~ !I .. 21 22' 21 20' 19~' '17;t, ~i~ k,~~ 14 4 & 7~~~ J. 3,. ~ IJ~" ~ IJ:.... ~ c.!2 . . . . .. .,~ ''Rl:' ii I~Dii \ .IU '35 jr- fo..-~ - ,. . . iN.,,'j7:J.,jf;' 1/' 1I~ Q."1 .11 Ji; ,.., j~ =1'~ F~ ~ ~2 ~ ~I E .10D,ItJ)f.I'f/DJ Ne',; 6..' ~~ 14<'" -:~1~1~m:r:;.~ r';;;I;"~'r.:!;' · . . 1\" -'~ ".1 ~.:~~...~~ !I ., m-':~' ~ .,il.~.J ~I F.EI ^-r~ .....", ....'6.., ...... I... .. 2 .' ...... ....,.._ ill ' SCO\J;~AVFp.:;.C' ~._ N. ~: .' -.i~"''''1''/o"1_ .~ it.' .)r,m~ '5.' .. /41."7 So ./oJ.. . 1.......f'LIl:~ u......")~. ,~. . . ';~~ 'f;. ~- .!I'Ge z.;~r'! ~ J ;,.; ~ : ~~. .."~ Ai'~~D"'''''T.'l-:'' "'..~.:4 ~~~~~_LO !J~ r:!;':~,~ "."~f!.'t\ 'Ii,J~,~ .J 4 'l. 3 Uj .:" ..,!! ..' l."~' ...."~~ ~ 3.:] ~4 t-ii>~'''' ,i' .y -;r:':. c: CI~.2 ~ .' \"....~ .. .o;..~.." ~ 11 I. ~ \ ~~P..... L'S.,.{.:i. Z I ..E." t. 5;1 - ~'oj >- ~ :r.tr----t-& 3' ~ 1f,.,z'(i?.>~.J~-fi;; '''~'' ,15.'''-.. ~~~ ~ "V.i.!' 0.1... PART~LOT . I' l: .h~litf,;- . "U' ~-f; ~ ZIS. 'IC ". ~'O IZSI~ "! tj1 II = . " ~~ . 2../M0l"; ..". / ~ Z ~~ Z I Z!..... . _. RRj NGEME /' ') ~ LOTS~ ~'"2~15,1 ANDI7~' 1':6 . ~~t-- t~ It · .nDr.,,~ '0 ,/ "~A" · !'~ ~ . '%< . ,~. . "i.' '~. ~~~':::i' "Po,lol ~ UI.1Z e," 0:. '~~-I h'::~-~l~t1~ :~~~ ~ 'l \l'.:LE 3 ~ - · ".~,~ ~f~: :l LOT 16 G"'~,.,.{ ~_. ~~.~ ~'I.Y.... ~: .. ~ ':;...~.. ,~I . . " eo" :l~".. ~4~ ,. ~(O.. .' .... o~ I IH lIS ,. \ il~. IJ' .,~,. '-\! ,. .' 1 ~ - "- _<:~~!.. - i. - l. ~~ .....-- ~. --e-. , -.l'L. ---i74l)T;r----~. .:-----/l1 :t ~ "/.~. ~ 1<> .,.~- , w "'''-_ ,-:.IDdU.."l _ ..:;".:;" _____.lil ;; It' j;"- ",'1 ~ .. z'ZS rUJ. J~ .. <<,10 Iio if f,'; ~~JO GARIDEN~)~ i'5 H~ MES~~~ I .' ~. :. ~ " - "'It'~ lUll 1 . ,e. 1"'- u.'~ .,,, """ I i~! ~:~.~~fl;: ~~:;:;:: ~:Z.:~l~' ~..i ii;C' ;.~ ~~ ,,~ GOOyR\v" L~~=~.3 ~ 2.~ 1 ~ ! g .. 3/o.n. r'" - It"~ lit .. ~ ~ .a.1ti; I 1\0--------- /...../ ~ ~i ~ 1"'-', ~ ~ " .. I"ll I;: LOT 13 -. s ~~ ". ." ~o ~ o' .. _-:! ~ . .....- F:.~~ ... -N#.' ,.,,,.... :ti=..... -I ':: c<< :.~ :------~ ~ ~~~..... ,L_ .' . ..." ~ _.,~~'i ~,. . ~~ ..:_- - ~~~~ ~!~. :.~ . oJo'~ I · ~i~ ., '7.-I7D-,-'~ ~ ''''14 .. ,.z.u.,... ~:. II~.~ '..- .'.. "4~-ll~ .~ '" :it I ~ ri.~ ... ~ R rr. W~ RMSBE. KE~~ ,~~, ...t'si ,.:.~~~ l:!4 S~I '.ll~H. ~ I ';i ----~~-- ~;;!I : 'i : 3' -~ 2. :~.I ~~~'fhf;;, "8' . '":..: i ~ ~ /06 :.9. ~ ~ \ ~.pO~'-I\ ~5~60 6{!O ~~~~ J D..15~ ~q~ ~fiDD3 ~t~;: ,~F.o:-""~' .. I.24'-'i,uIJJ~~I'z" -'.1 ~.:;ti;' \,--"'::_11!_l_'_"' LCR" ".0 ."""" _ "''''' ol::lI, ~." 5ZZ~ ~W.RRA"'E.512" ~ \. __ll:::.~ N~5t722 ~ .~ I'............~~_ (,00;12 'ties' I -.-' ........ ",600.- -tt::i v. .-.... ..'_ z. "'-"-Z773,78 li'es. -... ..r! ~..,( I ""t:; ... ~ ., r~i1' m.- "1 g 0 1-' . 1M ~~ ~d... N'::' "',-- oJ ~~ o o - r: .. \~ . 1>8 Ir:' ~lf ~ .'. 110.0_ I~.I ~ - :;;.. 15 ~ - 0 ;. '" . Z ~2lI . I I . 7S , I~ 7S : .... I: . ~26 . ,,":<}:. --)-fZL5T ~ it': ::1:' i:l'- '......~t i;\ , -------- ~. ~ ""......;.. qRE ~ i?~. !:l ~., '''' ~:J . ~ 1) /~ : ',:-.,J.&J::'-~hf-j- < ~ ~ISl '._r fia,. - --~-..,- I ~.~ \ ~'l{'~ . 18'R.2~t'-~!?~ .~~-'~ I .. is' . . 7S~ S22~ S:.,'5oI'1oI. 5l7.3' O. ~ rU"siw, ~ . .n,'l . . ~ r~ ZO~ 19~ le~ II 35th .:! - c( ::> 0_ ~ LOT 15 fL"117 LOT 14 . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number a) - '-I - / 'l Date Received 3 / ;}- , I () ). Amount Received S- CJ . OD ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: S3gcJ kCl//~/.tZr.rClcA0 / 2. BZA Petition D_~a . Petitioner: V~ l' L~ Name fj?~O .JoCJ/Y ~ Address " / City/StatelZip 76.f-777-.7C1CP &./,1-.?c~ .5Yfi?' . Business Phone Home Phone 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: f/It= 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): 5'31/.l MCJ /" Y j.e..rrac.-A- . . , 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: V Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial -Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. 7)or/I!J/C e- fclr fA ,'sf, '~9 / H~i~i:~''',"~ .~ k~ ~ ?;'l:"Y<'(";--' ~~";"'-~,:,;:':"',':~l :'}~:. ,.{t ,~""',:,,, '",,_ ::' i'~ (st~it will col,Plpl~te th is iteni) ;., . . !loa.!" <- Waiver of Section ',:,,, . il,:, ' , Subd(s): Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs. or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must, show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the hous~ and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. !J~~4 Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code~ Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the 'adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the, project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name Comment A? !7~r7 LOJ~~ fe,t~ (~u~'- Signaru~ ~~~/ ~rqcJ-- Print Name l/a/ley C~rn~v/};A/ ~~:r6y.~r;q/? CAv~h ./ . Comment . Signatu~ ..&.-,...,~ ~ c("erk - S"fes:s-'~e::.^ Address 3/ Q<::> L / /4lf <' .0 ~ y~ I\i . <:;>=::_/d"~~ (/"'//"'e'j/.A'1/tJ S$'~ Print Name --rq; <:l-- ~\C-. .s~~ Comment Signaru~ ~~." Address %\,1'; 1\,' L; 1",,,- b,,;~ Print Name Golf-fie.. . Sf ~ iYJ a . Y7 Comment ~~ ..' :~::/ , "i;?~ , " / "..-- ~ '2/' -.J. " ~ / ," .\ Signa~~~;;::::..,,:,:~t'/(.. ~/~..'r.u;r.~ f~ Aadress ~_. L~ S"3fon {awry Hr. (:;diolt'l' V('Uli V ft1A1 SJY((J.. /" \ . . . Print Name -5h("\cl-r ~ ('()'OD~ Comment Signature ~1' .l'rltOl a . .. d fW( W m~(L Address S~ 1 ~ ~ r:o (' Print Name ()~ tJ/JO.)~ /( /? #/e~ , Comment Signature ~ Address 0' .?~., ./00/>- Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address " . 5JreJ #w/y Street Address / -r" 7 fl.-//dc.L- "HOLD HARMLESS' I, I am requestin9 the City of Golden Valley to a low me to proceed Ith a(n) Ve-v/ l:h/fl~ onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Ha~mless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. . fJl7tJ/d J( /ffi1./~ Print Name jJ~~~ Signature ,?-/7-c?Ll Date ~~ ()~ City of Golden Valley Staff Signature . /...v.A a e...c..- DESCRIPTION: Lots 4 & 5, Block 1, R. Lt\I. WORMSBECKER ADDITION, accordingto the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. LEGEND: o . 858.00 x Denotes set Iron pipe Denotes found iron pipe Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes existing surface drainage N Bearings ara based on an assumed datum. Scale:. 1 Inch = 30 feet t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Iii:; ~ "'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Merila - Oliver & Associates ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 2781 FREEWAY BLVD., SUITE 120, BROOKLYN CENTER, MN PHONE: 763-533-7595 FAX: 763-533-1937 REVISIONS: 3-14-02 SPOT ELEV'S AS-BUlL ~URVEY For: DA VID RALEY 1157.21 "- I 11!111.06 lI5II.49 1159.111 1159.72 , I' ,,"',....., If..... t N 89"59'3J. E IL - 11 0. 00 (Plot) lI5II.l ~l ~~ ~cd gl!! ~ Cartnt. Drl'IeWtly - lIBt.I _.c ......... \ I s.t 1/2" /rtJn. '" 1160.9 - 859.87 - DRAIMV BY: KMM PROJECT NO: 1~ C4D FILE: aese. PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES 856.7 Found 1/2" apon /rtJn. N 89"59'3J. E 110, 00 (Plot) 109.80 (II-.d) N 89"58'25- E x /1$7.9 - lI5II.9 " II t LOT 5 II 1162.2 f 1161.6 858.4 . ll43 oll'B57.1 ! I "T' " L.VI ..,. \ 861.11 - J~ ff GcInIge it: it: CAR.n a . . 862./~ ~l - III t '" r,,_ 861.5 I Ol:a ~ ~ ~ ~"QJ .../ P cd . cd P 857.4 ... - 857.5 g l!! l!! 824.18 laD.. oj t" _ ~ 8.57.5:;!: ~ 22.5 .. 1;12 4.5 /157.4 "l III &lilting Hou.. I 1161.J ~ eJtllltlng Hou.. ~2 !'I , story .,../ 86a 7 ~ ' Story "l l:l LO T III LOME'ST R.OOR GDrrIge!l a'1[-1mo 1157.6 ru-v.- 854.70 ... 861.5 8620 ...'5.' ...GAR. FLOOR-862.0 14.8 25./' 2a.L ...r---l... ..32.' '1.1.::: 2z.L- 861.6 r 1 r 1157.6 86'.6 · 861.2 \ \ I enumlnoue I Drl'IeWtly T S 89"58'O~. W ~ ~ 110.11 (II-.d) I 110,00 (Plot) 1158.1~ont:l'Ot. Curb; N 90'OO'Otr W /157./1/1 Found 1/2" apon Iron. 110.00 (Flat) N 90'00'00. W 859.J7 858.85 -- ~ .LO"RY TE./UUCE CERTIFICA TION: Found 1/2" apon /rtJn. .-/ .857.9 18.24 ~ 862.1 ,.. - 859.0 I,..,'" "' L.VI v ~I ::'t- ~~ 8~ ~ l~ ,,::'t IllQl cdP ~g ~ 16.30 S1 ~~t~.o 8.57. 74 - I hereby certify that this is a true and correct survey of the above described property and that it was performed by me or under my diract supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. That this survey doss not purport to show all improvements, easements. or encroachments to the property, except as shown hereon. By.Q~ ..~ Peter M Wagenaar; Land S ayor; License No. 12282 Date: ~-Ig - 02. .. . . ='N.goUm~ll~ Y 4-9-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 5380 Lowry Terrace David Raley. Applicant David Raley, with property at 5380 Lowry Terrace, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant recently constructed a new home at this address. After submitting an as-built survey, it was discovered that this home requires a variance from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home is for .06 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.94 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Lowry Terrace. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, April 23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. ( ,\ . 1840 Spring Valley Circle 02-4-19 . Bill Knuth and Monica Panizo-Knuth . ~ . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 1840 Spring Valley Circle (Map 6) (02-4-19) Bill Knuth and Monica Panizo-Knuth, Applicants Date: April 17, 2002 Bill Knuth and Monica Panizo-Knuth, with property located at 1840 Spring Valley Circle, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants had approached the City to build a garage addition. This addition does not building setback requirements. In addition, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home also does not meet setback requirements. Below are the current requested variances: · The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home is for 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Spring Valley Road. · The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width over 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet at it closest point to the east side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in August of 1953 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. , . . . Subject Property: 1840 Spring Valley Cir Bill Knuth & Monica Panizo-Knuth, Applicants ch.- . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0;;1. - 'f.- I '1 Date Received 3/') g 10). Amount Received !>- 0, CO ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. !tll/ 2. 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): see a--/-hc/v,J SUfl~ '. LoJ / fyhdl aclJ /tOil. 6. Type of propeJ involved in this petition: Residential: _ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . 7. ~ Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. To!,,,, ;tJ C'c/ttltc{,..el JtI rC1.j e 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd{s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regi~ tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) wheretheconstruction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in t~~ amou~ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.' , \ \ \ ,. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name--1_f:'E Comment rJ'h. " . !1: t\ ( U' ''1 /' f \l\:'":}' .i .<.:::- Signature v: .~I/"u ....... f '~'./ v -L ~ " - /f .-!!-H / --./ .A~'d L 0 d 6:-H rf E' iJ Address Print Name Comment 01-( "") / Signature / ./2- A<;idress /' ;' . ,../ . . //' , /..../ . Print U/ 3,.1 pl!/''- I( -e,- /n yJ.....j Comment 0 ~ Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address ~ / f ~ 5 h <5l? /: 'ry L~!t ~ ('..., J . Jj '7 ;) S b~"'N Vfhj~ If!.J 7 J ---------e --------e ------ - - ~ ~ -- - - - - - - - - /lceIJ)J{//J/#C- / -\- - -ne/lre- ~P/Fh! I 6 0 6 0 "c. ~cp 14.8 Ble I/F' PANKONIE CERTIFJCA TE OF SURVEY .~~~ ADDIITON S89"44'58"E10Q.DO ... .; LOT !b!J ,q: .. EXISllNG 1-ST \'rl)-FRAME ~ FF=100.0 ASSUMED DATUM I/F'l. o <( o ~ N II') ,..: Ol UJ . ~I Ill> FENCE b 0 0 0 Z 25.0 0-" TO SIDING ill ~ I L'l. 14.9::i: TO BIT ~':- 'I' 60.0 t\~ DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, GOPHER ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN >- W -.J -.J <( > () Z ~ 0... (/) ~~ ,.. ;l:la .og BUILDING SETBACK REOUIREMENTS (AS PER CITY STAFF) 35.0 FRONT 25.0 WEST SIDE (CORNER LOT) 15.0 SIDE _ REAR 99 co 0 ,,~,..: ~ ~ UJ b 0 b 0 ,>0 0 Z 16.7 I ;U ~ I III I~ i "I ~ ~ ~g as 0: Ii! ~:~ k>4'o 2 o If) C> z is III g ... ill - EDGE BITUMINOUS N90'00'OO"E 80.00 '-... I " I 'x " 1840 SPRING VALLEY CIRCLE 'GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 763-542-3265 (H) 612-296-5346 (W) - 66.> ........... 101 .......... SPRING VALLEY CIRCLE o If) I!IQ!E;. THIS SURVEY IS FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF THE INDIVIDUALS. CORPORAllONS. AND/OR PARllES NAMED THEREON. AND STANDARD OF WORK F~RvEvOR BASED UPON "NORMAL" STANDARD,t$ CARE REQUIRED BY LAW N BEARING SYSTEM ASSUMED SCALE IN FEET o 40 60 20 ~ X SPIKE (NAIL) SEr . IRON MONUMENT FOUND o IRON PIPE SET X25.0 SPOT ELEVA llON ASSUMED DATUM (EXCEPT WHERE NOTED) BILL & MONICA KNUTH 837 ---f-- I ........... @ 2001 SURVEY & MAPPING SPEClALIS1's- REPRODUCllON PROHIBITED I HEREBY CERlIrY THAT THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS THE RESULTS 01' A SURVEY PREPARED BY liE OR BY THOSE UNDER IIY DIRECT SUPER\1SION AND I All A DUlY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS 01' THE STATE 01' IIINNESOTA SURVEY SPECIALISTS t KENNETH G. HOLl/BECK DATE: IIlNNESOTA REGlSTRAlION NO. 18890 . LAND SUR\!EYJNO. 1.AHD DESaIPllONS . CONS1RUC1lOHSTAKINO . SUBDIVISION PLATS ~~MN 1=~:;: ~! fl'>4r.r-0171 1M YE1RO (713) 2.'-0171 SAUIC IAPIDI. UN 51371 . . . . . . . . WWw.ci.~Um-ll~ Y 4-9-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 1840 Spring Valley Circle Bill Knuth and Monica Panizo-Knuth. Applicants Bill Knuth and Monica Panizo-Knuth, with property at 1840 Spring Valley Circle, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct a garage addition to the existing home. This garage requires variances from building setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following sections of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the existing home is for 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Spring Valley Road. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width over 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet at it closest point to the east side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, April 23, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification.