The URL can be used to link to this page

05-29-02 BZA Agenda . . . Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7PM 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room I. Approval of Minutes - April 23, 2002 II. The Petitions are: 510 Valleywood Circle (Map 12) (02-5-20) Robert Thimmesh, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks .. .4 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.6 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the north side yard property line. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback requirements. 3142 Quail Avenue North (Map 4) (02-5-21) Raymond Anderson, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Quail Avenue North. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks . 5.8 feet off the required 13.7 feet to a distance of 7.9 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the north side yard property line. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback requirements. . 3235 Kyle Avenue North (Map 3) (02-5-22) Dennis and Joy Dienst, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 3 feet off the required 35 feet 10 a distance of 32 feet for the proposed garage at its closest point to the front yard property line along Adell Avenue. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. 1425 Rhode Island Avenue North (Map 15) (02-5-23) Peter Ralph, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (B) Rear Yard Setback . . 22.7 feet off the required 28.8 feet to a distance of 6.1 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the rear yard property line. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with rear yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings . 2 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 3 feet for the proposed detached garage at its closest point to the north side yard property line and for .8 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 4.2 feet for the proposed detached garage at its closest point to the rear yard property line. The applicant is also requesting to build the garage to the north of the existing home, rather than behind the home. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition on the property. . 2 2300 Indiana Avenue North (Map 5) (02-5-24) . Daniel Plunkett, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks . 3.1 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 11.9 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the south side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. 401 France Avenue North (Map 8) (02-5-25) Jon and Bernice Swenson, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (3) Side Yard Setbacks . . 9.77 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 4.23 feet for the proposed deck addition at its closest point to the south side yard property line. . 6.3 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 7.7 feet for the proposed room addition at its closest point to the south side yard property line. . 1.77 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 12.23 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the south side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a deck and room addition to the existing home, and to bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (B) Rear Yard Setback . 9.5 feet off the required 25.3 feet to a distance of 15.8 feet for the proposed room addition at its closest point to the rear yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a room addition to the existing home. . 3 6620 Olympia Street (Map 15) (02-5-26) . Shaun Graham, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . .2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.8 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Olympia Street. . 30.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 4.9 feet for the existing deck at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hampshire Avenue North. . 19 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 16 feet for the existing home and the proposed 2-story room addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hampshire Avenue North. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage and 2-story room addition to the existing home, as well as to bring the existing home and deck into conformance with building setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (B) Rear Yard Setback . . 4.7 feet off the required 28.7 feet to a distance of 24 feet for the proposed garage and 2-story room addition at its closest point to the rear yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage and room addition to the existing home. 6808 Plymouth Avenue North (Map 15) (02-5-27) Frederick Jones and Bonita Yurch, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks . 6.6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 8.4 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the east side yard property . line. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with rear yard setback requirements. This would allow a new home to be built on vacant lot 320. . 4 . 925, 955 and 957 Winnetka Avenue North (Map 21) (02-5-28) Robert Venne, Applicant For 925 Winnetka Avenue North: Request: Waiver from Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (C) (3) Side Yard Setbacks . 20 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 0 feet for the existing building at its closest point to the north side yard property line. Purpose: To bring the existing building into conformance with side yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (A) Parking Lot Setbacks . 33 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 2 feet for the proposed parking lot at its closest point to the front yard property line along Lewis Road. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new parking lot on this property. . For 955 -957 Winnetka Avenue North: Request: Waiver from Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks . 21 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 14 feet for the existing building at its closest point to the front yard property line Winnetka Avenue North. . 15 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the existing building at its closest point to the front yard property line 10th Avenue North. Purpose: To bring the existing building into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (C) (3) Side Yard Setbacks . 20 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 0 feet for the existing building at its closest point to the south side yard property line. . Purpose: To bring the existing building into conformance with side yard setback requirements. 5 . . . Request: Waiver from Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (A) Parking Lot Setbacks . 34 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 1 foot for the proposed parking lot at its closest point to the front yard property line along Lewis Road. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new parking lot on this property. Additional variance: Request: Waiver from Section 11.70, Subd. 7 (F) Loading and Parking Requirements . The variance request is to reduce the size of the parking spaces from the required 9 feetin width and 20 feet in depth to 9 feet in width and 18 feet in depth. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new parking lot on this property. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment 6 . Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals April 23, 2001 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, April 23, 2002, in the Council Conference Room, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair McCracken-Hunt called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. The Petitions are: unanimously to approve the Those present were members Cera, McCracken-Hunt, Sell, S Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were Sta Recording Secretary Lisa Wittman. I. Approval of Minutes - March 26, 2002 Shaffer referred to page five, paragraph six and unimproved street" should be added to the en MOVED by Smith, seconded by Sell and March 26, 2002 with the above noted , 2700 Regent Avenue Ever reen Remod ap 4) (02-3-13) ant Request: Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks et off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 feet for the posed garage addition at its closest point to the front yard roperty line along Regent Avenue North. o allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. - Olson reminded the Board that this variance request was continued from the March 26, 2002 meeting because at that meeting it was discovered that the applicant would also need to request this front yard setback variance. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Sell and motion carried unanimously to approve the requested 3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Regent Avenue North. ,- , . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 23, 2002 Page 2 4500 Chatelain Terrace (Map 8) (02-4-16) Bernt and Deanna Grosberg, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 8.17 feet off the required 35 feet to a dis the proposed garage addition at its cI yard property line along Westwood 6.83 feet for the front Purpose: To allow for the construction of a g home. Olson stated that the applicants are requestin build a garage addition on to the existing ho existing attached garage and would not come Westwood Drive North than it currently cause they would like to dition would replace the the side property line along McCracken-Hunt asked if the appli corner lot. Olson stated that wa a 15-foot setback and they wo de to request this variance because it is a Jit weren't a corner lot it would only require d to request a variance. Smith stated that he didn' replacement and is not e c ncerns about this request because it is a ing on anything. MOVED by Shaff request for 8.17 garage addif North. y Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the required 35 feet to a distance of 26.83 feet for the proposed st point to the front yard property line along Westwood Drive Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . .024 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.76 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Lowry Terrace. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. 2 t . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 23, 2002 Page 3 Olson stated that the applicant recently moved a home onto the property and it was later discovered that the home placed on the property did not meet the front yard setback requirements and was off by just a couple of inches. MOVED by Smith, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for .024 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.76 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Low ace. 5380 Lowry Terrace (Map 3) (02-4-18) David Raley. Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. . .06 feet off the require the existing home at i line along Lowry Terr to istance of 34.94 feet for oint to the front yard property Purpose: To bring the exis . setback requir conformance with front yard Olson stated that this is essenti Terrace). It is the same ap same request as the one above (5360 Lowry he same situation. MOVED by Sell, seconde request for .06 feet 0 home at its close 0 ra and motion carried unanimously to approve the d 35 feet to a distance of 34.94 feet for the existing ront yard property line along Lowry Terrace. ey Circle (Map 6) (02-4-19) d Monica Panizo-Knuth A Iicants Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Spring Valley Road. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks 3 Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals t April 23, 2002 Page 4 . . . . 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the east side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. Olson stated that the applicants currently have a single car g build a garage addition that won't meet the setback require discovered when the survey was submitted that the existi setback requirements along Spring Valley Road. uld like to Ition, it was does not meet Bill Knuth, Applicant, added that the proposed gar the property. Cera asked Knuth if he had considered takin whole new garage or if they just wante e ex' ng garage down and building a arages. Knuth explained that the roof in th existing garage down would be r e existing garage is flat and to take the Shaffer asked if the new ga stated it would. n would line up visually with the house. Knuth Smith asked if they Knuth stated that on putting a door between the two garage stalls. et would remain open. e was concerned that it would be too close to the neighbor have any other choices on where to put the garage. the application and stated that the neighbors didn't seem to be the proposed addition. Cera stated that he thought the minimum distance away from the property lines allowed five feet because of fire code regulations. Olson clarified that the fire code requires buildings to be at least three feet from the property line. MOVED by Sell, seconded by Smith and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Spring Valley Road and 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the proposed garage addition at its 4 . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 23, 2002 Page 5 closest point to the east side yard property line because the Board considers a single car garage to be a hardship. III. Other Business A. Election of BZA Chair tion of the MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried to BZA Chair until the members are reappointed by the City C B. Discussion of May 28, 2002 BZA Meeting Olson explained that there is a conflict with the Ma suggested they move the date to May 29,200 PM. Olson stated he would let the Board kno BZA meeting and , r to May 30, 2002 at 7:30 ate would work. IV. Adjournment . The meeting was adjourned at 7. . 5 .. . . 510 Valleywood Circle 02-5-20 . Robert Thimmesh . . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner From: Subject: 510 Valleywood Circle (Map 12) (02-5-20) Robert Thimmesh, Applicant Date: May 22,2002 Robert Thimrnesh, with property located at 510 Valleywood Circle, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to enclose an existing concrete patio. This construction conforms to building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicants to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless form is attached. · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for .4 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.6 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing home. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in November of 1978 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 510 Valleywood Circle Robert Thimmesh, Applicant (P;rI Df 1815) Luf;,. /Jible 1114filvfe . 61Z5 . II i:> ~ ,. !: -6 ~. ~. .... .~". ~ ~ \: /MS:S 111 . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0 ). -5 -")... D . Date Received 4/11/01- Amount Received 5" D. OJ,) ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: S'fo VItLLE")'WooD ~l Rc.l-e 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: 'RDl3E~ F. "1#IIV\MCCSH :::~o :'fr -J ~ q~:s~~p !C~W 6Si 4A ~", 7'3 5~a- 'f74g . Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Ld:. ;)..,. B( ock. :J... )Valle.y Wood 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: V Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. . Ex(~fiItO house (a;; bu)ft ir.. 1't7tt) 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s}. Subd(s}. Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings, and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of$ ':10 ~ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. WJ--~ Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) ofthe City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property . will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name . 2' "t "" Comment l C^~I ] , Signature .:J(J tJ..., 1\ (?, A f/..../l Address .~ M Print Namj!; · &L LEN b (() i00 AI 'I . Comment '. VtJ.-/ (~7c.otJoJ CIrci Address . Print Name ,.t\ I C#f1tE"t- YtJ"'~ Comment O,e /)--r ~W'" <:f- 1't6C avai l ~~b. Signature Address .soo V Prl...l..e(woof> C, ~cLE PrintName Larri. masemQV) Comment Ok Signatur~. :nz~~ Address 6"7d-' {J/"<bn J71eh1.M.tJ . . 510 Vt1:U€y Wa:>O C, RCLE Street Address "HOLD HARMLESS' I, Ro/Jerf- F: "11, t 1M1I'\~'a~ requesting the City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) add r-bot\ onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. . RoBEf<.T 'F:. --ri+IMME.s:H printN;e~ Signature .t{ - (b - ;2.00 d- Date JJ ~ IJ~ City of Golden Valley Staff Signature . L , , , . . , , I , I sr / 0[.-1 o ~I . ::ii OU.! o ~I >- ~I ::> ~I <( t'5/ <( ~/ o I w ~ ':q- I"') b o z FaUN IRON 2515-58 1274 FENCE CORNER 0.40 FEET SOUtH AND EAST or PROPERTY UNE FENct ANGLE 0.20 FEET NORtH or PROPERTYUNE 125.00 UTILITY 'EASEMENT -m- ..f lot. ..---..-.... 1.!)." ....... _i-."- J 0.8 O\IER\'\i'llG '") ~<... I/) -" SET IRON , , '. . . I . . \ ./ ./ ld~.g. --I 9x9 S HED .: I/) .,. o us, B,lUll,N E'/IAY' o R I Y , f ACE , .-/ -- --:;0-'-______ ---- DRAINAGE: AND UTILITY EASEMENT 'ir..... " ---------- \ FENCE CORNER 0.40 'FEET NORTH AND 0.20 FEET EAST or PROPERTY UNE fENct 5.6 FEET SOUtH , OF PROPERTY LINE - _.J , L _ _ BITU"NOUS 2.8 FEET SOUtH or PROPERTY UNE . N88.24'04"W . SURVEY FOR: BOB. THIMMESH PROPERTY ADDRESS: 510 Valley Wood Circle, Golden Valley, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2. Block 2, VA~LEY WOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of d survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Doted this 10th day of July, 2000 Revised this 7th day of August, 2000 ~ t'-1 t'-1 ~ '"-< NOTES: , , FOUND,':' ...._. IRON,' 1.... by. 20281 1. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the west line of Lot 2, Block 2, VALLEY WOOD which is assumed to hove a bearing of North 00 degrees 34 minutes 41 seconds East. 2. The area of the property described hereon is 14,727 square feet or 0.3381 acres. 3. No title . work . was furnished for the preparation of this survey to verify the legal description or the existence of. any easements or encumbrances. , FOUND IRON -- 198.85 -------- ~ "" NORTH SCALE 1" = 20' EGAN FIELD & NOWAK SURVEYORS INC. ~~~E~~iA =~~D TE1.E: (612) 546-6837 25733Rl . . . . . =cL~Um-~ll~ Y 5-14~02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 510 Valleywood Circle Robert Thimmesh. Applicant Robert Thimmesh, with property located at 510 Valleywood Circle, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a room addition onto the existing home. This addition meets building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a variance was submitted for the home and it was discovered that the existing home does not building setbacks. This construction project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for .4 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.6 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday, May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. ~ . 3142 Quail Avenue North 02-5-21 . Raymond Anderson . . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 3142 Quail Avenue North (Map 4) (02-5-21) Raymond Anderson, Applicant Date: May 22, 2002 Raymond Anderson, with property located at 3142 Quail Avenue North, is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). Recently, the applicant was one of four property owners on Quail Avenue North to apply for a redrawing of lot lines for their properties. As part of this subdivision process, Mr. Anderson is also required to request variances from building setback requirements for his existing home. This project requires variances from the following section of City Code. · The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request is for .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Quail Avenue North for the existing home. · The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 70 and less than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 5.8 feet off the required 13.7 feet to a distance of 7.9 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing home. Previously, this property received variances. In October of 1951, a variance was approved for this property for an attached garage. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant received a variance for the garage to be located 7 feet to the north side yard property line. In August of 1983, a variance was approved for this property for a front entryway. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant received a variance for the entryway to be located 32 feet to the front yard property line along Quail Avenue North. . . . On May 7, 2002, four adjacent property owners, including Mr. Anderson, received approval of their Preliminary Plat to redraw the property lines to correct several building and driveway encroachments. The staff memo to the Planning Commission is attached for your information. Because there are new property lines for these lots, our City Attorney has advised staff that Mr. Anderson's previously granted variances become null and void. Therefore, he is required to apply for new variances for the existing home. The other three properties meet building setback requirements based on the new lot lines. Since these variances were previously granted, staff has waived the normal $50 fee for this variance request. At this time, Mr. Anderson is not proposing any exterior remodeling to his home. At this time, the four homeowners have not received approval of a Final Plat for the property. Staff recommends making a condition of these variances that they only go into effect when the Final Plat is approved by the City Council. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in September of 1948 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 3142 Quail Avenue N Raymond Anderson, Applicant . .._, 277J.7! ~<l'$. --, lot/ ,.._ Z..IC!lJ'p,,';; .". ' ~. Jt .., . rS;;:" ~~..":" p"rs oplllf1HlJ u_'. .... I -.::.... "'S I tRV -"',..- T a ~;..: .:.;' J\,<n<,LO,VR'l "T.t'~1 ~ll!ll4' ;;;ttlil,T;', , . 1---"" ,.., I"" 571.#' ,--" 1 .~.;i 'LOT.) ~0l.Z1~ '.J '20 ....-'1--:1.-:-15-'-.'- IIUt:T. .. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY ,f."--- ." ,. '- ?t.. · 'I. -,. A~" I ~...: ~ I .'11/.... I ~Il?, 2 ~ I~.. PARK "" :',. 10 .. I o1l", I~ 14; IS~: ,,;;, 11~ ,,"IU. ~ ~ {;~ '. "., . -..' .t.rl ~ : ,_I "" ;;;. .:: ~~i ; z ' "', OJ;:; 7 II. I'. I'. "l:- Z "I , ~omm.fks".CIJ." 3. /DO ",'/JD C OUTLOT I ~ ;; '1:1:. '11 ""-!$o · ~~1'" 155 -Tor-,-Tol" lOt ..' __'l. L "l: ~"'.:f: . _ Ii:; 55 ..:..c__ ~ N....... II.' ' .to. ,.;;-~ ~ C -', l".. _ ~' v" 'A. '!I =. I: 3..", ,",;"." . - -'II .~ . . . _~ "lo I. '! .... t!!:: ...~In '" ~ C) ~;, ~ 4 ~ . - ::: ,. . 14~~-'.1!,!.y-.t~ -J~ 1'" ". - -;, C) .. ~\~ ..~'S~ ~tt ~;. ~.' ~~~}:~ -l ;:~} .-~- :fA~ ~i&~;zt.l~~ ~.. 8 _.. I"'~'L ~I'J.:',~ ~ 1< qo 1..'~A\ "JI~~~~~",'''!i'Lo~'\le "~~'f; '~I -'~-l~:f.l'.!m-.. ::;~~' ~. ~ !A -~ ~'It .....!'DRIVE- ~zo.."..~ "'; ~,. 10, I.S ~.. ~~. 2. .. ~ 5.~ Ii.t ~...~ \ a ~ ",,00 , ,300 ..~' ~~~ ,,~,,;"P'~'I..~;:";"'r:::,.~Jt'JJ' ,."p:S -1'. L ~J.....~40'::- To'US.::o; ,"'" \~1'O\"'{'"O.~~ ,J"~:'.' IIZ,II, ,r A' .... .:; ,A.fi>'" ~ .?~ ~v~i:~' fS'" "'b , I. .\ 1 ,". "'." -.' q' \ t'~'\ . roJo~ .1.Jo" ': t'".I!" ib~\~\ .'.' 1.'" I'L ,';:,, . ~1'~"'" :"r.-J! ,~ *I .,.' \ . \ \1' , ':...!Z '.:!!! , .' ,.., · '~""I~"~Io1i 4' ~"i' , J 0 it... M'. ",'oll! . . ..,p.~ ". I ." "t~~ 1:1 /00 ."...~ .' " J:.~ ~ ... ~,t..... t "'ll; O~N: l.~.."" ~ . n';hh.;:;' ZoZ.off ~? ~,' ~ ,:~'.."",z.. ...,~,.~~(~,,, .S{---.f. 4~ 5= J~.ZI;! 1.~~ ' '!(' _.~;: I~' s,:. 'n,. 7 ~ '>L<< ~.:"4' ""'Titu , '. .~ OJ .,~ Z ~ 3 -: I 1LI ... r l't4JI.., .. ..~.,<t.. 0 Z.. z1l:::i.:lII: I 0 ~\,..- ~~',. o/;!,.. . 10 "~{' '" "',. "~. ,I ~. ,.s~ . ~>' . ~ .. ..:,......- 2 ~'" "=' .,..~'i oj, 2 5. ,~..". " ;.. '" ',s \ l!.Zo' 3.1!~ ~ ,I ....o;l-.d 05 "',.~ '"~ ~so ~-, ~ ~ .' . , .,, 'V~l " ' ':,.,.4-':".: ,:oj ,_~ .;-___.,.__." h___,U_ ~ - ~ _1i-\~~ .Iij "'''::'~ 8""", i I <e' .~' v~ .."....... ~ ~, '-l~. . I 'r,J~.ot.f, '"'4 ~~' ~i~. "~. ~ ~ ,:: ~ j 'i..."o ,~~ '" I' " "-'.; '.'" .~~, " ;'.o~ , ..l\,..,.\~r II.....~ l ~..~___~ ~___._~~ - ."~'li m.....- 4 ".. ". ~.. . ~~ . ~rP. ~~ "4i1- ",. II m: \. \ "To!~~' !100 i It '., . ~R l 1'. ~ <<.:; 3<~ i ~.' ~~ ~ I.~. ~~ . .'.0: '. . o\'~ Ii' T-"". : .. ~f .,,~~... ," Ij--IS.. -/1".. ";"':B ~"1r./ .t W c;.S:~.~'i b~:d'~I!>, " :1..( :f .M~~ ", ~ ~D"\ ~ .' ".1" "',_ : _._,n~ -___,._" ~ , 'O~ 'to. ...,- > "!!I ' """"'.. .t:>;.S4"N' ~W".\,(i.i 1 ~";~ ~ t .~. ~ <f '-41<>/~ <t" .. ..t-{J if.~'I' ' ::...ISL;1 ....;., \'" 4=. .153 SI 'T.".I ~'" '01 .... . II ~ 'cII ~ ,3 4...",.'l'.~-e~;;-:.:::. '",~IO~ -:_~. 'IO-"~"~:\""'~-" ~l>.";(~."'I~'lii'~. ~!. ~___u__,. 1'''-'-:- ,u__"._,' '!II.. ~\;. 'TIT. '''" 1 ~ - . 15 0 ,. Ii../I '. ,.1(" 1"'''.- .-- .. 2. ~ ~ ," 7' . I g l ~ ~ ., IJp ':""1~' ;j.~_~ ;- i ~ q:~_'O ..., 1.r.:5 ... '4 ~ . I 1<. r~, ~ . Tto<~~ ~':".1; ..'~~' ~----'____"'-'l--' 'Ii ~.' - --~f' \f..:~. 10 ~ .___tUP_~~ . -.-.--- __n.u--. G: 4 .~..'o__.." CII~~~~\.. '4 ~i"" ., T-~~ \0. ~, ~l~'I/,' I" ,J :~ IS I I.~ _, ; & S i:-"": ".-:." i"_._!25.5~'<< ~o\ .~",....... '~_L_1:; "-~:;~-iul ___J!U..!..... c--; -~ ~ ... ~1!li- '""'.", ~ ---- ') I~..--- ~-., ffi..t-- , !lei --.,,-- --...-- - II; ~~ "".:~.........~')'" ~.\.o'~., -of-- :. 8 1--.'S _~. ..\0:.4 + ~l!!.I:il!.'4. ,., . ~'",. ,'\'\1JUl ' .;,j:\':.1~ . ~. ",. -: 3 .- ,u~ I" '" 105 ,.,,.:- \11, ;;.. , ....~~\~;.!\I.~---, 'g,'i'\':1 ".€ i$.:_~"'~-' '~'~~~~l ~'~t.\:--l-;. I:!~ J. '., ,~ . ~ ,.~~~.m !i,lf;!lrl... . ~_-'~' __..~ ~.' J--:- ,.~J~~~~"..~;;' ,0< ':l': i;!.,!;' ~~.': ,'lI' ~ 8 ~,1 ~ . lt~.~o;-_, ~5 : 14~ _ ~-- ~I}---- ...~~ ,11 '- .~ =- I : ~.., ,F . ~T,.,,;;I1?~ ~flW' l:! l" ..II.,>';. "'"~~~_ ,;.r .. 1-::..-. ~ '1 ,.;!~_ .,~_. '2 _ II · · ,f.!V; 4"'''' 1.,I',,-,:,'1SiFl' :;'-i:,~;,,, HI' .,.,~:"'"...~[ ~ .!~ j~'V~;;~!..-"f .~~\O ~. ~ .,T...- '~ _ r".', ~,~ ,.ToI,.,," "" JO lOr ... ~..... ....I!.I ~ If_I "''''W ~ . I M' '" .It ""'t.. Ii, I". 111.-.-:' "80 5J~ : .~' ~;WI' s.. A"'~ ~R.L S. [.:;.;0.512". Iii.: Sln8 ,^'U "-R' ......n' .--ia.it .VE A- t(D~ ~ ~'- ~fl.)I:" _ " ,5047 51>>7 !JOlT 80L< '00' ....J,.\ L'Y..I:.I .927 ..nOA~_ ~ ..~I ~... ! -,,,,"' .._.' .\-. I'=~. f' f~:!.~. L . .'~i~4::.,p _! "ii'" R -6'1' iStD i ... -'r.-~"1 711 ~ 80 .,77 OJl'T '.''-17'1 M ~ ~ -~ -~ . 100 100 I I "l 9 .~~ . b.i..~+~.J ~I=l 'f.eC 1" .' I 'A. ~ :.OJI~ .~.,IJ'I:' . : .t''':~ 50 ~~"'...".~, ., j.~. ~ . ~ . 7 ~ . . " ,?qo , .\,~' O:~h.~I<*f7-' ,~ '.N t~ 1;;4.~i i' ~,,1.!:! 3.~.4!:: s!:: ,!:! 7~l.lOlJi$f).lfllv iJ... '" ~8 ... 't C I' .0 ';;'- , lc>".... .. z...l '.,.. .,' , - , "'M; :::A ~ ~ 4 .~! Z ~ I{!! 14'." 14'.0' , oJ.S .0u "-. ,..." .. '.' . . . '~ 100 I ""~/~ i "L_ .....r.e..::::1.ifJ ~ -, ~ I z ~ ~ "" ! ~~~' ~1 L 2 H 4G~ 50 I ~ J~ Z .,.3 ;s:n:7'l""" 5 3 7 B , ., ../ 5 ,'W' 4' IZ6 0....., "1'~.'. ,ft" .." ! ."''!'' ,lh" .!t" ,!,.. . . ~ ;. ~ . ' < ~~ ," ...' . ~~'on NV .., 50'0 $030 !S02() SOio r. fllsO .~~O I<. " ~ 11;,; ..'.. 4 k'. . ",J' <!i!.'"'If,rgi IEW , '.rl:r.-i;'~:\ ,mfsT'i~;",~~:i.:;.;,' . ms 4918 .:;:5 ::: :;; TE~'bCE .: ~ . (Revised 1/99) . Petition Number tJ) - S -~ , Date Received S/t, /O;L . . Amount Received f< e . """ ;'v~tJ ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 3/42. QUA-It. !ivf, NoeTH J GOLD ~ U4UW 2. BZA Petition Date VVlfr1/. Co ] 2tJO 2 3. Petitioner: -e'{-t-t( V\A...tJV\t) ~ RYt.~ f.(2..5d'h Name 3 I!:! 2.. <Qu fl./l.. &€ A.lo 60LbfM. tJI/lUr,; Address City/StatelZip }'Hilt S'~-'I2,. 7' "1-S7t..f- 5""37~ 7'1-S"Z(-B'IIG, . . Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: Lor 12/ gwC.K- BJ u.JoeD~N/JM2-K. 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: .)( Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. H 0 f). ~ L IYr1 () A-r r & If f,b G f+eA.C:, E, 8. (Staffwill complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposect surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Bo~rd of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~d, IU~~<- Signa re of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . --0. '-_'" 8 ' "- -~ -.......---.,~~---~-"'. ,,------------. -) Q II q l} \ \ . -'_.-~_.-----_________ -.-.----- \ ~~1V' ~ , /.~-..------.---'...~ \ "./0030' .....:--~ . (-;8.60' 1--- ./(JI} . .0..;"1;, ......:--___...... A .I 0 Pl..4.7') \ 7 -....... _'. .8./ -<.:0 _____..... 8 "'"" . '_ _ _ 'I __ '-. ,.. Uv 0.-'. I --'-"-.c I >.. A _____..... u<'.o.' i.) .e /' ---__~ U. 1/;1" q 1-,. _____.---..... J /1, :;:;~~_:e~'-le-'-~ ~~ ~~ \,\~~, "o.";}~ ''e \, \ I~___ n -~ r~ 8$"t-, --,I'Z~\-f------- 80' ~'-lqil{- r ; r" ~ ! I ""....to...~ I ,'""", ," 1 ~1' ~....1:-) : ~c> I \ j / "~'-",::._" I f..- --.L~-----T"-, , ~.. ~ I ",-~,-<, f J '.~i /Ph I i... JrJ I 1 \/ . ,.... ~ --. :;:c.c;: tJ /~t>,?:'J If :~t.l '.'t l/;::;....-'"l:J. ~ ......~ ~~ :~ fit ~ '- q,t- . I _:. ,:. " , " , .... /'P'" _---, ------ I r8'~ \ 192.06 \ \ \ Cc .'J.l ~&;~ ~... 0'0\ l~ ~ .\4 b.o;'"l:J ~gt -""l ..-~ t'>:! 50' 5<'___-....../ . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763.593.8095/763.593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Dan Olson, City Planner Informal Public Hearing on Minor Subdivision of the Lots at 3124,3138, 3142, and 3146 Quail Avenue North - Karen Muchemore, Jay Tirpak, Raymond Anderson, and Fred Reiter, Applicants Subject: Date: April 2, 2002 Background Karen Muchemore (3124 Quail), Jay Tirpak (3138 Quail), Raymond Anderson (3142 Quail), and Fred Reiter (3146 Quail), are requesting that the property lines between their four properties be redrawn to correct several building and driveway encroachments, and to more adequately reflect the perceived property lines for each lot. Qualifications as a Minor Subdivision The four lot subdivision qualifies as a minor subdivision because the properties are part of an existing, recorded plat, create no more than four lots, and do not create the need for any additional public improvements. The applicants have submitted the required information to the City that allows for the subdivision to be evaluated as a minor subdivision. Staff Review of the Minor Subdivision The Woodlawn Park addition was platted in 1947. The building and driveway encroachments were recently discovered when two of the applicants had property surveys completed for remodeling projects on their property. It is unclear how the encroachments occurred. Possibly, the developer of this subdivision decided to revise the property lines from the approved plat when the homes were built in the late 1940s, but neglected to properly follow through with the required city subdivision procedures. The City did not required as- built surveys until about 1980. The new lot lines for this minor subdivision reflect where the homeowners perceived their lots lines to be. Since this minor subdivision is located on an existing platted street with access to utilities, the application is pretty straight forward. The properties do not lie within a floodplain. The City Engineer, Jeff Oliver, PE has reviewed this minor subdivision and has found it to be acceptable, with the exception of the need for additional easements to be shown on the Final Plat (a memo regarding these easements is attached for your review). The site plan . submitted by the applicants have all of the required information as stated in City Code Section 12.50. Section 12.50, Subd. 3 of the Subdivision Code states that lots in a minor subdivision must meet the requirements of the appropriate zoning district. In this circumstance, the Residential zoning district requires that all lots must be 10,000 sq. ft. in area, have at least 80 ft. of width at the front setback line, and meet building setback requirements. With the exceptions (noted below) for the frontage at 3138 Quail and building setback requirements for 3142 Quail, these lots will meet those requirements: 3124 Quail Avenue North: The home at 3124 Quail was built in 1948. Both the existing home and detached garage at this property meet building setback requirements from the proposed new property line. The lot will have 86.03 feet of frontage measured from the minimum required front setback line. 3138 Quail Avenue North: The home at 3138 Quail was built in 1948. Both the existing home and detached garage at this property meet building setback requirements from the proposed new property line. The lot will have 77.2 feet of frontage measured from the minimum required front setback line. This lot does not meet the minimum required frontage. . 3142 Quail Avenue North: The home at 3142 Quail was built in 1948. The existing home does not meet the front yard setback requirement of 35 feet (it is only 34.5 feet from the property line along Quail Avenue North) or the north side yard setback requirement of 13.7 feet (it is only 7.9 feet at its closest point). Although, variances were granted in 1951 and 1983 for these setback requirements (the minutes from those meetings are attached for your review), our City Attorney, Allen Barnard, has advised staff that these variances become invalid once the circumstances for the granting of the variances has changed (in this case, the replatting of the lot). Mr. Barnard has advised staff to have the property owner at this address go before the Board of Zoning Appeals to request variances for the existing building after the subdivision has been approved by the City Council. The lot will have 91.6 feet of frontage measured from the minimum required front setback line. 3146 Quail Avenue North: The home at 3146 Quail was built in 1948. The existing home at this property meets building setback requirements from the proposed new property line. The lot will have 111.8 feet of frontage measured from the minimum required front setback line. . Qualification Governing Approval as a Minor Subdivision According to Section 12.50 of the City's Subdivision Regulations, the following are the regulations governing approval of minor subdivisions: 2 . . . 1. Minor subdivisions shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the requirements of the appropriate zonina district. In this case, one of the lots does not meet the requirements for frontage in the Residential zoning district, and another lot does not meet building setback requirements. Therefore, a variance from this condition must be approved by the City Council in order for the minor subdivision to be approved. 2. A minor subdivision may be denied if the City Enaineer determines that the lots are not buildable. In this case, there are already homes on each of the four lots. 3. A minor subdivision may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it is determined bv the City Enaineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems by the addition of new lots. In this case, sewer and water lines are available to provide service for all of the homes. The existing street system is more than adequate to provide access to these homes. 4. Approval of the minor subdivision may require the arantina of certain easements to the City. The final plat would show all necessary easements as required by the City Engineer. 5. If public aaencies other than the City have iurisdiction of the streets adiacent to the minor subdivision. the aaencies will be aiven the opportunity to comment. In this case, no other agencies have any jurisdiction. 6. The City may ask for review of title if reauired bv the City Attornev due to dedication of certain easement. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 7. The minor subdivision may be subiect to park dedication reauirements. The policy of the City has been that there will be no park dedication required if the new subdivision does not create any new lots for development. In this case, there will be no new lots created by the minor subdivision. Therefore, no park dedication will be recommended. Variance Criteria from the Subdivision Code As stated above, the approval of this minor subdivision will require a variance to the Subdivision Code. The Subdivision Code states that the Council may grant variances as long as there is a finding that the following conditions are met: 1. There are special circumstances for conditions affecting said property so that the strict application of the provisions of the Subdivision Code would create an unusual hardship and deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. Economic difficulty or inconvenience shall not constitute a hardship situation for the purpose of this Code. 2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner. 3. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood in which said property is situated. 3 . . . The Code states that the City shall consider the nature of the proposed use of the land, the existing use of land in the vicinity, and the number of people who will reside in the subdivision, and how traffic conditions will be affected by the additional development in the subdivision. The City may prescribe conditions to the variance. The Planning Commission is expected to make a recommendation on the variance request. Recommended Action The staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision and the variance needed to permit the non-standard lots. It would seem to be in the best interest of the City to allow this minor subdivision to eliminate the driveway and building encroachments. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Minor Subdivision and Subdivision Code variance with the following conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. Easements be shown on the Final Plat as outlined in the memorandum from Ron Christenson to Jeff Oliver dated March 28, 2002. 3. The Certificate of Survey submitted by the applicants, dated March 20, 2002, shall become a part of this approval. Attachments: . Location Map · Meeting Minutes from 1951 and 1983 for the variances at 3142 Quail Avenue North · Memorandum from Ron Christenson to Jeff Oliver dated March 28, 2002. · Photographs of the four properties · Certificate of Survey for the four properties 4 1.. 2. . 3" 4.. . . p ( d. Vlt1,':J q/';!I?S / 41"11\ WI ,') 5("0"'- tIt1 /r-~ +-e S recommendation .t as requested by allow constructi Laive the side yard rerements ~ Lawton, 2936 Majo venue, to ! of an attached g ga. !, ~ed in the PI ing Cmnmission's i. petition t ange the name of Ardmore D . e in Glendale Addition. . / H /./ le1y:: regl'>ade, gravel and n/ ngri-La Addition. a letter from the Planning Com- n reply to our letter of May 18 our street from Xenia to ~ The COLUlcil cone ~~9tion denying t .~. Avenue N. t d. naK!. ol"der of S . ekat 200 ottawa A ar yard setback requi nded by Loughland, car st be postponed until a ot present to e1~lain his as in regard to the req nue S. for waiver of the t ements. Motion by Patterson, ed, that the action on this re- ater date as Dr. Shimek l'J'as hardship. t---MOtion by Hetland" seconded by Ly:nch.\lg~rried, that the l"e- quest of Lo }1. Smith,.~42 QUB:!lAyerll1ew-";;-, to 't\Tai ve the side yard requirements'-beallolrJed so that he can build his garage not close!' than' T'ft. from the north lot line. This request;1IJas. allml1ed taking into consideration that Mr.. 8m! th had a bad drainage pr~blem and that if he placed his garage farther back on the property it would act as a dam and inter- rupt the natural draina..gso Also, Mr.. Smith had a signed statement filed with the administrative assistant from the Ot~er of the property on the north of his lot stating he .... did not object to this arrangement.. The Commission suggested that it would be a good idea for Mr. Smith to build his garage out of.non~combustible material.. Mr. Vi 0 Olsen presented the plat for final approval on the propert .ust north of' he community store district orth of Sixth A ue and jus west of Winnetka Avenu Hotion by LynCh,seco d by Lo ghland, carried, th e plat be accepted \-fith tli 0110 ing stipulations. That 20r"i'; 4 radius.. Drainage across Lot No.. 5. and accepted illage.. ,t; .# Oetober 2, 191)1 . inG notice thereof, a regular meet- il of the Village of Golden Valley, d at the Village Hall in said Village of October, 1951, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following me. Reiss, Stark, and the ~1 " Acting Nayor Pin::::' absence.of Mayor Sta the rove meetinr as read. X I"lr. L. !vI. Smith, 31i~2 Quail Avenue N., presented his request to construct a...'1~ att!:fc1:1ed -gar-~fge 7 ft. from tl16 north lot line. Motion by Putnal'1i seconded by Rei ss carried to con- cur in the Plannin8 Commission's recornmendation as outlined in their ,letter of September 18 allowi ng Hr. Smith to erect his garage not closer than 1 ft. from the north'lot line, and to authorize the building inspector to issue a building permit. . Acting Mayor annolli'"lced tiJ.at this wa n8 time and aco, Inc. to bIG Grove. Affi 11t was presented a legal notice" the Nort~ 3ennepin poke in favor f the vacation.. land and others spoke etition bearing forty osing t' vacation. Letter from the ney suggested that the Parl{ oss Lane on the basis that all park property. Motion by Putna~ to reject the petition to vacate t the Village .8.ngineer to provide north of Cross Lane into Report was on assessors' p discussion of to assessors' other co by Reiss ca ied to set $10.00 per ay for the 1 authorize rmnediate paym a&ninistrative assistant r subur n communities. After sed valua ~ons and payments made nunities, m ion by Putnam seconded he pay for th" village aS~H3ssor at O-day assessmen eriod and to t for the year 1 _ . ion by Reiss seeo ded by Stark carried r 410,389.88 prese ted by Jack E. Welch Co acting Camp y and to authorize e proper officials to sig the cant act for the construct on of' bridges in Shangri-La. .;: .. i i I I I: !: I, Ii r Ii l! !i Board of Zoning Appeals Page 3 August 9 , 1983 . mith could be be reached. standards. said he would really like to see what viable a1tern~tives there so cost alternatives so a possible compatible compromise It 0 nized the present garage is inadequate b s the present proposal and ion of discussion, es. Art Flannagan said he could pot look fav also suggested alternatives be ex . At the Mr. Peterson said he would 0 look further into a eo to defer the proposal to the regular September Meetl Second by Larry Smith and upon vote carried. 83-8-17 (Map 4) Residential 3142 Quail ~enue North Raymond and (Carolyn Anderson The Petition is for waiver of Section . front setback for 3.0 feet off the required 35 foot front setback to a distance of 32 feet from the front lot line at Quail Avenue to the proposed addition at its closest point. Mr. Anderson was present. Consent had been obtained from adjacent properties. 3A.06(1 ) Mr. Anderson explained that they had owned the home for approximately six years. They have planned extensive upgrading and in doing so wanted to improve the front entryway. Mr. Anderson said they had considered adding to the side of the house, however the surveyor found there had been errors made when platting the original subdivision and the side lot lines cannot be located for his house or others without extensive, expensive and lengthy proceedings. The Board discussed the effect on adjacent properties and Art Flannagan noted the street at this point curves, there is a difference in elevations between adjacent properties and in his opinion it appeared there would be no adverse effect on adjacent properties. Larry Smith noted that the house was approximately 30 years old, that the pro- posed entry was over the existing footings and well pit below and the proposed remodel would substantially upgrade the structure. Larry Smith moved to approve the waiver as requested, noting the hardShip of previous survey errors, the 1 ack of other reasonab1 e a 1 ternati ves and a 1 so . the topography and street configuration. Second by Art Flannagan and upon vote carried unanimously. . . . . . WWW.ci.goUm_vll~ Y 5-14-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 3142 Quail Avenue North Raymond Anderson. Applicant Raymond Anderson, with property located at 3142 Quail Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. Recently, the applicant was one of four property owners on Quail Avenue North to apply for a redrawing of lot lines for their properties. As part of this subdivision process, Mr. Anderson is also required to request variances from building setback requirements for his existing home. This project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request is for .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Quail Avenue North for the existing home. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 70 and less than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 5.8 feet off the required 13.7 feet to a distance of 7.9 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday, May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. " :. . 3235. Kyle A venue North 02-5.-22 . Dennis and Joy Dienst . " . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 3235 Kyle Avenue North (Map 3) (02-5-22) Dennis and Joy Dienst, Applicants Date: May 22, 2002 Dennis and Joy Dienst, with property located at 3235 Kyle Avenue North, are requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a garage addition onto the side of the existing home. This project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance requested is for 3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Adell Avenue for the proposed garage. . Previously, this property a received variance. In September of 2001, a variance was approved for this property for the existing home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant received a variance for the existing to be located 33.15 feet to the front yard side yard property line along Adell Avenue. At that time, the applicant believed that his proposed attached garage would meet setback requirements. However, after designing the specifics of the garage, it was decided to apply for the above variance. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in February of 1952 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 3235 Kyle Avenue N Dennis and Joy Dienst, Applicants . I _Z~15 _ 10 ~. el8 '" !II ~: el7 "I l&. 8 o~ }o.,S >- 9 !::. . 310.4- 0 10 ',C. 11 15'- 5 .... ~ II ~ ~.. /jlZ ~ ~ ~ ! C) ~ I 16!~ 4 ~30 .--- Z~Z8. 34 ~ . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number {j ;;- - S - ?2- Date Received 'i/40A Amount Received S"!J. 00 ($50' residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 3d-3S- /LVLE riUt:=/()Ue- A/D/C::J7I 2. BZA Petition Date 3. DEc0D/S c:f)J-ocr DfE.tJ:5,- Name . /' i / 3~3S- .)GtJL.~ . 7lcJe-A-JUE: ./UoeTH ~. l.::7 v. Address City/State/Zip '9-5"d- ~ / '7 '3 3S-~ /0 =3S-d-? tb /cJ-O Business Phone Home Phone Petitioner: 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property ownl9r and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: . , - 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): LbT L.) /3Co CR- ~ #D 81.-1:::- - g I~ Ve- 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: X Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial . Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. . 8. j}-H,qe-I-f1::--rJ ~ 1/ZrH7 e- 7rJ SIDF oF'" Hnt/_5E ~A/{J / ,v-r--t;; 5.e=r-ltyzt-CK- ... (Staff will complete this item) Be TJiJIJEZJ /Z)U/Br 4.//~L BE i1i:3vt/T .3 F/ Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons, necessity. or hardship whictl provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. . Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings, and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shan be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ _ '\0 .~ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fe~ ' ~.. . / . /&; eJ4" Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name /}.<f...+ 1/ 1. (/.;.~_<::~ b6ua-i~ 5"",,;---n+ Comment Signature #~~k~ Address 3.~3D LEt rivE ;-10 Print Name -f.et-- tf ~~ CA~' _~DAJ . Comment .) Signature J6~. CaJ:J-fft Address 3d-dS- /<-tlLe livE AJ 0 Print Name Comment ._~.p~ Signature q ~KI/71-- Address 44t90 riJ)€U- IJc/E Print Name Comment Signature Address -- ~ . AIJELL A VE. SCALE o~" \ 'BUlLOING SETBACK UNE 'v' 108.20 SET IROM 6 =95'37'10" R=18.13 _.--.-----; L=30.25 , , , , , . 6=00'20'37" R=306.90 L=1.84-=;:, ___ -- -ro1RON / ~ I I f\) IROM ^ \ SET IROM w . o ~ n___ 26 -n--l t" o o z ------- 35.59 --.----- if 5 U') ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q NORTH "" <Xl I'i <Xl _nnn_ 35 ____n__ Ii) Ii) <'l " --.;.---- 35.34 --.----- 1" = 20' : , , \ SET tRON SET IRON S88'13'25"W 130.48 . SURVEY FOR: DENNIS DIENST PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3235 Kyle Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, BlockS, NOBLE-GROVE according to the recorded plat thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this 7th day of May, 1999. Revised this 20th day of May, 1999. by. ~ ~ Minnesota License No. 20281 NOTES: 1. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the South line of Lot 1, Block 5, NOBLE-GROVE which is assumed to have a bearing of South 88 degrees 13 minutes 25 seconds West. 2, Area of the property described hereon is 11,367 square feet or 0.2610 acres. . 3. No title work was furnished for the preparation of this survey to verify the existence of any easements or encumbrances. 2605-25 4785 EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK INC, 7:415 ~oto .Boulevord SURVEYORS ~~~eo(6T2~ r~6.:im 25143Rl Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Gorden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals . September 25,2001 Olson stated that the a lica setback requirements. process of submi'lSt'f home does not ar meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, Septem 2001, in the employee lunchroom, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Gol Minnesota. Cha racken-Hunt called the meeting to order at 7:00 P __ Those present were members Representative Shaffer. Also present w Wittman. I. MOVED b ,econded by Cera and motion carried unani es as submitted. II. The Petitions are: 3235 Kyle Avenue North (Map 3) (01-9-38 Dennis Dienst, Applicant Request: : 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks . · 1.85 feet off t point to th re feet to a distance of 33.15 feet at its closest property line along Adell Avenue. Purpose: ng home into conformance with front yard building setback proposing to build an attached garage that does meet the d that this is a fairly administrative variance because during the. ng plans, itwas discovered through his survey that the existing ck requirements. MOVED by te.u secQD1ded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the applicant's request for 1 ;85~fe,gt~ff the required 35 feet to a distance of 33.15 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Adell Avenue. Purpose: Request: . . . . . . . . =m.ci~Um-lt~ Y 5-14-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 3235 Kyle Avenue North Dennis and JOY Dienst. Applicants Dennis and Joy Dienst, with property located at 3235 Kyle Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a garage onto the side of the existing home. This proposed garage requires a variance from building setback requirements. Below is the requested variance: . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance requested is for 3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Adell Avenue for the proposed garage. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday, May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. / ~ . 1425 Rhode Island Avenue North 02-5-23 . Peter Ralph . '. . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763~593~8095/763~593~8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 1425 Rhode Island Avenue North (Map 15) (02-5-23) Peter Ralph, Applicant Date: May 22, 2002 Peter Ralph, with property located at 1425 Rhode Island Avenue North, is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a detached garage to the north of the existing home. This project requires variances from accessory building requirements. In addition, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home also does not meet building setback requirements. Below are the requested variances. . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 28.8 feet from the property line to a structure. The requested variance is for 22.7 feet off the required 28.8 feet to a distance of 6.1 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the existing home. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the detached garage shall be located completely to the rear of the existing home, and shall be at least 5 feet from any side or rear yard property line. The property owner is requesting variances for the detached garage to be built to the north side of the existing home at a distance of 4. 2 feet from the rear yard property line and 3 feet to the north side yard property line. According to the applicant, the existing attached garage will be used as storage for a motorcycle, lawnmower and other similar equipment. According to a database for Hennepin County, the home was constructed in 1920. No other pertinent information was found in the file. v . . . Subject Property: 1425 Rhode Island Ave N Peter Ralph, Applicant I) " 'C ~ l'i ~ ~ .. ~!.II : 8_'~;I."l.'1 ! 8 ~~~2.17;' 8.~ :r;'.17 i e-\~I:.. t4 - . ii! _-..:.--~ . I ~ . /J/.'~ i ~ '~;.IO ~ 9.~tl,.~..c o-i 9 i~i" flIII!,....l..~. -~::: 1_ ~.. ~ ..... -,~'.16.' 9 ,..,~6 9~'!:l1O ;iJ .~.. '''.'' Il:i- _..J.3U'_ . .' "lJ. 11/'" Z ((. It..... I. =: ~~~; '_~_ :::>.1-,:- ~~.... . . ~ .: .'31,4' ___ .~i - - - <(!!! ~ .. 1".IS'f~- . "lilt , . l)"l)~ ..~~': '1$ ~ 2.. . .15 . '0.' . .15 10.!!l . ::. ~~.' ~~6 , \"I\l\::~." v...o. I - . I .nm !! 1'/...' r~. iti.. "'.7& l! .. I :t Lot.) -~' ... ~!!. 6 I! 3.!. ~ t!.6 ~ 34! : l'9. .14, II . ';: . ~ ~ .'4 i. II . ~;: ~ l ..~~ ~~':l b:1 ~~ ~ "L71 ....1'. "'.'z' ,,,,,, I ...... ..... I !II ,.. 0 nu'!! ~.... =~-1 ~ lIS ;l;;C:C! ~.. [) ~~DDlrIOI ';:,'~~' . !2~ 1 .~~ N" ~~I~ ~ ~ i 5 .. 4.~!J .. . 5 4 H I ~!l -:'.'3; 12 .. ~ Io! ! t .'3 ~ 12 : ,..~ It · ~.. 9~ l.iJ ~ I' 1....~.,,~ 1I.,t"r:-""l~llZo",...~ ..,.:. 1":'" ,....,~....~"...~r:. !"'k'lI>'u,. u".,!""t ~~,dNH' -~'ffs4?'1'. ~_A '!i7850. .. '0'''''Z- ,,,,. nl :YUD1A ~... m." ST \i m.., ~ ~ \. .. ~"f"L~!1,!L~!~O u~ ..' 4" I .0 1$0.0' ~~ .,,4,.....:1. 10/:::'/ '\ .33 ~::~.~ 1~\4.a ~ ~ ~'f ~ 't ~ ~~ o'Jf ~ :r~~ ~ a_i44 ~ ~~ . 12:'S(E,:4~ "~~'~~" ~ m_~__. o!! I - "i ::~;j.... "I h((,i--" t.~ ~.15.1 7e~Z-'1..I!.~ ,.%~~;:1..I!.1"...t.~~ 'tj~",~,~.lt5" ~'i.:.~ 1..,lt--.... ..11 :,--: &~ ~~~.ll.-~C-....i!llU :'.\1'. .~_:!.. ~,i':, 32.~..t s.:4.~1J: ." .lft. >3.. . ~ :.(/) ..... ....!!! ;1 .... .& ~""'5" ..... !^....~..), ,,' \1.4 4.. E~ II " ~--ji 3;:; ~ ~~--~ ~-ttlll ffi. II . ~4=1 r\! e...' .- ,.~;: ~~ ~-ti'L- i----- 0 :;) ------ .~----- ..84' ..o~"" ;; ~3.eo-'" -. Il~4' 5..~1' -10 . ~~ '~~lll!. ..5-;3, .10., 5.~ jo !!.f'fi'jf~ ,~!!s. -/lI~~ ". n . :;--:. 0::: \:l ~-.,.~ ..-:-:--;.....a!!l, < ,,, :t. ..' It'. . ~_.II"W '" . '~'.lh' . '.'H'.' .t=~-" C~';:_'1:.....:,_,..<r:..L-,' ,.~. .\'~~,.,;: .'~ll ~,'~:- ~ ~~~..1 1",}.:n~.3!L ~ 'J.~ ~ "~:1 t:4t ~ .1", .1~~f1 IJ ~ iL~~' ~ -:~~ dol. . - :". . . .::7t1.0'WINSDALE!!!~ .7700 ',:';.ST;,..,,; .: ~":; ~ 'mi<t. <~,. !. II ~3ilt~"'!''f.f.'i.....'.'''~ .X'\o1 .at'. .. ..!~~.14'~ 'l.'j"':.i. ,~~.:;rt'~! ;Il~~~ ~ ~:.:: ~~'.. - par. . -'--e- - ---.- .. ----- ---,~ .. -30:. ,<1-0 li'1t\. ~'~f:.~~_~' ___._ ~. .13 "f . -t;~-- __~__l e~.UJ 1~~~ I i;.ll ~. ! ' ~. IN~ ,~.~I'lV &'.' ~~~ 11 'M.".....;. . . ,- _11l~_ . "" to! 4": ~ I ""'7i8..6 ~:_'I~_~)-"~~._~~~~_.~~__ . .~. ~II"','"'-t..: Ip ~~ Jt- 4~~~l_ :~:2~~~~ 1 ;p~ ~~L_" __~...!~. 10.. ___6__:. ~. .10.' ,.. ':S_..f_=,,:_ __" Tl:';'ST. "01'510 ' l~~,?_:; :",t\; , . ' , .~L., ".'h:\t . ~~ .1;t-':~~~"tIt'C 2 "_p!:Z"__ ~-- ~ -..--- --~- ....1-.- -. Z'1i< I~ ~~~ll, -3 ....~..:i ~ 4t.1 .14~ ~ J i-31t4'.'.g 11".o1~~,.' 7. -3 u .so1r. ~~: ~ ~ ~ ~ . ... "'#, tI,:OO KNOLL "'" 77rJ5 -'7 _g"",. ST. '.':' 751< 75'''' ,;.;".~ !....IR21...lU2~~;; 'e'JJ.'- 11.~r;o ". '10'4....'1 ' . . . ~I I)..S!........,'.... .:".' . "1'0" .. N . . r7f" '!'ZI . . . . Ii ..' '..' .. !It .~ ....' :: - , ". .... :':'1 ' Ii I I .,~ -.. ;; .:.~ ~ ,,~..3l! - ;:": . 1141 ,...<..: 1b" I " . . . - a~' ..!.. 1 '4 ,.. ^ .. 1'0 g !ij12~ . '" :if . . ... lOT I I . .., Z !! Q4i:: Jil;;.. _~ . e. I ,I I... . . .... Z . :1Ii.\1 4;t).)j' i1!fj -,'5 ..~I~'~ t ,1 .,....:lIil~.~II"I.IZ ...1.3. """. IJ'\ I '11'1. L2CJ~'~i;" ., '.I'.' ~ li lJJ.I~'1 \~"'~.'. ..... .... '." .:--F!~F,.,_' ... . ..' . I." ~ -.. '. . . ~~~ :;; ll~: ~ ~;'i, I . ; _ 1'728 Tno "'8. I '4b1 . . : ~ .0 t~ ~ ~ '..3133 1i;z C. ,. 10 40 '4 'cj... . . ..l.,iu!..,..! ~ 40 '0 . . .' '0 ':!~ - . l!1~~. \. '.:: -"1- . " PLYMOUTH,i?'Oj MY 76H -. . AV~J'$1275Oj, ; 1#'1..1i :r...;r .....- .....;.. ".. " '.. , ." '1,' l>>itl."4. 'JOIv.. .... 74f)0 .' :: ..' . . . tUZ,OSRes. .... .. i '.' . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0). - .~ ...;;2 ) Date Received ~ / " / () ~ . Amount Received '50.00 ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 14-25 C<hcde..T5\C\.~ A\YU"'ue N crt~. 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: ~t:.er- ~~\~'h Name . \ 4-25 R\1crlQ 'Isb.v1cA A \.lev) ue Nof'\~, C "\J<x\\~ Address City/State/Zip bt2-280-114-0 lh'3-54-S-6P3Q Business Phone . Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: n 10\. . 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): 5001\-\ 4c Pf of I.-6T ~, 'TC6'Ell-tEf.2 (,..) rO-\ l.arS "5 ANP> I-t-. jZl r')CK ~ I WINEl14\, HE.NNE.PtN ClrUl~, N\N 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: v Single Family V'" Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Commercial . Other . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name [;e'YTYL.LcLe L t Il eKey Yl7,{~)1' Comment )1JJ tee.1~~Un,aJ Signature A&~~fJ ~ ItA.t?~~ddress 'I t.l4 7 RI-LJhk )lir/i~r:;) athV '. , ~4""'" : DeA&Jft7J ...."., Print Name -. Comment NO 8 ~je-(..-f I lr\--." j Signature + \ \~~. Address 14L{ 0 s~1eYL Itw- N. -6 9::: ---r--:::' .', ___ . ,,'-) Print Name / On ,f"'\:.z/ E / .~5 ,I J.I 4- c ,t:... _. .. .~ " Comment ND I ;'-::> .:::~ ':r /' ~ I~ . , i J Signature /-~ .i / ~ Address /4u ~/4""'-'C: ,.-<411'. AI /. ..' ,....<;././J...... .j.', /1 J..<.J ,_", c..~.~ // i .','.. ~ ,../ . 'l Print Name j'<~ AvP 7+ t .jfrfi-IP Jtl'-' L9s..&A1 Comment ^ JrO CJ ;1r/ &GrlaN r Signature 12~ Z ~ Address / fCfJ I J2ffpj pi$- /5, A vt!f-, Il/e# t r . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. . 1:A2~che~ ~Dl(j2. 34-' \r.1iPE )c: :2-4' DEEP 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiv~r. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey .of the praperty must be attached. Prapased surveys are nat acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State .of Minnesata. Th~ survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance fram the hause and all other buildings ta the front and side praperty lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the praperty line will be needed, if in Question. Alsa, the survey should shaw anappraximate locatian of any buildings an adjacent praperties relative ta the side(s) where the canstructian will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additianal capies of the survey far use by the ,Baa rd. . 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. p.~L., Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 0 '" I~ lil en <( w ::i co oi It) ... ::= a It) .... 0, ~ o en !:l .. m <f>!> ',.j 4.2"- . r::--(' I ToBo ~' ,.2 '0 1:1 6.'1::t: GllA'<f:L '~"J 1-S WD-FRAME FF=100.0 ASSUMED DA ruM 1'4251 _AI. U1IUlY PRESlAtED E_T BY USER 1- - -1- I ---l ,if N~8'42'20"W 143.9 CALC ~orJ,- 54.2 . (),I Ifill( 0..' --~ -- ):.-0 J- 2- I -I- t:1 ~I ~I I I I PROPERTY AREA: 23,OOO:i: ~.F.I -----__-1-_ GRA'<f:L eOj~ 3 PAVER BLOCK . ~ '---.~ CRAl'CL - ........... --- WI) DECK -- ~9 '" 1';- 116.8 UNE ESTABUSHED BETWEEN NW COR L 1 (IRON MON) at SW COR LOT 5 (IRON liON) '" '" W N " '" <0 " m &"? 40.8 SW COR LOT 5 . LOT 4 " ~ t/.QIE;.THIS SURVEY IS FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF THE INDIVIDUALS. CORPORATIONS. AND/OR PARTIES NAMED THEREON. AND STANDARD OF WORK FOR SURVEYOR BASED UPON "NORMAL" STANDARD OF CARE REQUIRED BY LAW ,~ 51.6 588"33'OO"E 144.1 CALC @ 5 2002 SURVEY &: MAPPING SPECIAU REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED 38.3 - - 51.7 !> 4 0 U -1 Z <( u w 0 :;) ci z CO ~, ...... <( W a Cl 0 Z ..... <( Co -1 op ~ 0 0 W Z Cl 0 :r: a::: 4 0 . ~ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I I I I I I I l- I I I I I I I t- I I I I I I I ~ I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: SOUlH 40 FEET LOT 2, TOGETHER WITH LOTS 3 8c 4. BLOCK 6, WINNETKA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN SURVEY AS PER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLIENT AND/OR AGENT NO TITLE RESEARCH CONDUCTED ~ N BEARING SYSTEM ASSUMED SCALE IN FEET o 40 60 20 WlEW X SPIKE (NAIL) SET . IRON MONUMENT fOUND o IRON PIPE SET X25.0 SPOT ELEVATION ASSUMED DAruM (EXCEPT WHERE NOTED) REV. 05/08/02: Porposed garoge size &: setbock PETER & JULIE RALPH 1425 RHODE ISLAND AVENUE N. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 612-280-1140 871 ~ SURVEY SPECIAUS'l'S. . lAND SIIIt'lalHO . LAND .l'IESCRlP1IlJfS . CQHS1RUC1tON STNCIHO . Sl.IIlMSIOH PLATS ::-.r:rUlf.= =::: ~~ f::l:-c"71 NWYE'ntO ('113)......0171 SALlkR.vm....1U7I . t-,;- - :- - - - - -=- - --- - - -'- ~ --: - - - ~~ . '''l-, ~ ' . '. r~ ' I . I: I I t I I I I " I I, I I I /11 I . I' I I ! I ~l I~ Ii' i I I I 1 I , I .. I I; I' I I I I + I :1 ~ ! II' I Z-I' 7'11" I ~, Itl J u' I I I q ; ! : I 111 ; I I __II, , ~I ~L_ .-- ------- I I ~I ' .>i' +' / / +/ / /... / . / oW A, ~ -i. ." F::--w" F'~' t ! : r-:- IS 1;li' I \6'4~2." 1"'2.' l' ~Yi' DIP>. ANCHO~ iSot.:( SLML PltR\/'l\rr~.Il. " , 2...", '40 TREAlEll PLA,a' --~ ..,.... ; .... ,')). ......' I j --'- -.-",'" I . 17., . ., l> I . . '2..- 'Ii 0/1'1 tl.€Il:: ",AllS. I 19 . . ~,". I' I> .' _ :-... I t> ~_ : . '-' 1 I' 1111'S III:: ~ s! l:> , ". . c.8J I -1111'S/III -I' "~II/S . I . ~I't. 11/=[1'1 D - l>.. - - - -'t- 2.~" lIlOT6 I. CDNCI!(~ "fo BE 4;000 PSI W'ITIl 2.~ :Ii' ~IIllFoCl.!.11\l6 RODS M !'Ef<.W))E1l:l1. AND LDAD B(Al!IN.r. wALl.. !Z'. CONcllt1E 1b Sf: MiXED Wrfll {lEINf'O""NC. IVIlao FIIl.ll(S oA bl<.b 10 -to Wl{lJi( Me:S.H. 3.lfz." CIA. AHCJ.lotl Boers St." 17." rl<OM Al..t. (ollNEaS & M 4:(,," MAl( CEI'(l"tLES -'\' SILL l'WE:.1"O BE 2,..b .40 1'(Z(<;s "'~"Tt.D 8" 1'2." (,....b I'.' \ ~ ii) 1rt..WIR~ME.s'" yi' DI,.. ANCl-loR BOL1' (r~)(" .40 r~'I\rw PLATE. '+ '. '" J:. . I (, ..,:- 2.:_?l':..!?IA-B!lf'J>A~<5 -.~ '-. D. . :>'-"~II '. J. .: t1 .: .' '. ~ II 'o~" ~. . · .-' , {;' . 0 . i ,___ .. I . o. .. ~. o. , D,'_3. '/>.', 9c..~ sU\f> OEiAIL AT INf. gEA.:I.\tJ6 IIJAlt.- . ,- -, .~-.~~.. __.._._....._.......'.... "0'''' -,1,;-;-----'--- . ~(illlllll, I !li7iftW""~"'''-~'''''' ~~!ii {!II" . \PWI' ! !flJ1Ull Illllfl'M. ,'/''// PERSP(C'T1vt /' ~_-:.._.-... ~ __ ..-_.... _.._-:-::::~~:-":l ......-...~\~t~I'f Hflt\'f(l p';,% ./ ~tf/!I' ll.( 1111111 ",r'", IfltH ,.' 'litH'" .~ .... / I%l,~ J!qJ . . NORTH E.lEVMI/)N 80llT" ELEI1^TIOfJ . PHI:R& .TUllE:. RALPH '\4.25 P-HOl>E ISLANb ME N. GOLDE.N VALLEY, MN 5542."; PIlQIiIE G 12. . 2.80 ~ IIlI.O PROPoSED D(1'ACHLD 6ARA( SLAB DE1'AIL & E.LE~A7"lOfoJS ~'.t -r... .r:-r'" . . . . . . . =ri'~Um_wlt~ Y 5...14-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 1425 Rhode Island Avenue North Peter Ralph. Applicant Peter Ralph, with property located at 1425 Rhode Island Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a detached garage to the north of the existing home. This garage requires variances from accessory structure requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, a survey of the property was submitted and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following sections of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 28.8 feet from the property line to a structure. The requested variance is for 22.7 feet off the required 28.8 feet to a distance of 6.1 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the existing home. . Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the detached garage shall be located completely to the rear of the existing home, and shall be at least 5 feet from .any side or rear yard property line. The property owner is requesting variances for the detached garage to be built to the north side of the existing home at a distance of 4. 2 feet from the rear yard property line and 3 feet to the north side yard property line. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday, May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. ~ " ,. . 2300 Indiana Avenue North 02-5- 24 . Daniel Plunkett . . Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2300 Indiana Avenue North (Map 5) (02-5-24) Daniel Plunkett, Applicant Date: May 22, 2002 Daniel Plunkett, with property located at 2300 Indiana Avenue North, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a garage addition to the existing home. This construction project requires variances from the following setback requirement: . · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 3.1 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 11.9 feet at it closest point to the south side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. Hennepin County's database shows that this home was constructed in 1956. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . . Subject Property: 2300 Indiana Ave N Daniel Plunkett, Applicant .~ : ~ . i 3. _ on ." ~ PARK RlCE LAKE .~'l. t:/rr' ., ~ WJ.LGY ?,,-t' , RESERVE t OUTLOT A "'- l'J ri 0)" , (\J f--7 . ~- I . . sa 1l'l:tl'IO"W. ~ -f- - '~"4." f?es.-- . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 02.- ~ - ).. Lf Date Received s-/ tv /0 ')- Amount Received Su, CV ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: :J 300 fr,c/;/1/VP, )]V"f'. Nor t~ 2. BZA Petition Date m'1 y ~ ~ ,,~ ou..2.. 3. Petitioner: (J,q 1\1/ ~_ I v: fJ hI r; ^ e. ii' N~;OQ ~') cl//f;v-1 A Vc, ;lo", '!7/, c,JJptV ~/t'1IJ7/V~~'I>>" Address City/State/Zip ~ / -< - ~ '-) l - /5"'70 "7 ~J -..s-.i / -r~ :J.. Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property'involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): , . .... l01 / G"m.6g~/;;/VcI /J; 14 :Jr- d t<;Q/.JJf;o/Y' 6. _ Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: k Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other ' . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued . /. :.,,:.:i ":-'< -f-; <'~ .. i<.i,~;:,;: :ct" 1., . '''-{::".' .. "..,-/ /,-c; ~...-..:-: .--':'./~'" (. <C' ".~. .:":. f /,' /'. /1/ /')-' ,c. / ,/ " /'~ ~ I,' . ~/ 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- teref,lland surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey r)'lust show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the hous. and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shalll:)e $hown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximat~ location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. . To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $..(0,00 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. N~~ Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONEYEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have.oh your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told aboufthe request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name Comment (/) t< 0 6E ]C:.7 C~EJ"Z DE Signature ~~t...-iL Address ').3L/O .:J'.6i>t;,,<qtl~;V Print Name . G ~. \j)~ \'\A tV'-- Comment Signature d1LW'(WJ.A- Address ~ ~i q.\A" ~).~ Print Name Aft, ~ '0... Wy Comment Signature Address t7d J ~p/,q..N 44 tld .. / Ai Print Name Comment Signature Address " . . ~;.L;~ 1'4 ~i<~ ~ ~ I /~~~ If /2-'-a~~../ ~ W . .~~""^f ./'~~?.: . - ~ C} {a~-vf;/c. ~ votu~ ~.f:;!/ ~ ~ ~. .tJU-0. '7 ~ ~ 4-.? kro ~ 2:b ~~~ ~-L ~ .(~~~ c~ o-rJ ~ ~. CW./~ /T>-o ~ t'o ..t~ ~ ct::.. ~ .~ ~~~A ~ .~ ~~ - ~~-AZ/. v~ .~--. ~ p" .H~ ~A/!A~AAre/ p; ~ I~ ~. ~~-? ~~~-o ~.~~~ CVh~.~ ~ ~./D~ ~~~ ~L~ ~ .c-~.d~ HAo ~; ~m/ ~ .~--s/ ~ ~ 7el~~ . ~:d_ .~ ~~~ crl~ fed f~ ~ ~v( ~ ~ ~. J-LL., ~ V vu-iL/ ~4? rJ _. . .", /~pd"~ ~ ~/A~~ .~f~.~ ~ :5Y. / /717 ~-"h /;4I-fP . zt-v ~,~.~' .~~~ ~ W _ ~ ,k~.R--n ~ ~~ ~ y~ h~'y~ ~~ ~/V~ N~~::tI . R=67.5 6 0 . . CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, CUMBERLAND HILLS ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN - TITLE INfClRMATION PROVIDED BY C1,IENT. AGENT OR COON:rY TAX INfORMATION NO TITLE RESEARCH..",CONDUCTED. UNLESS NOTED "- "- \ z w > <( <( Z <( o z 82.5 :if; Ul I b~t !"J2 s;l"! 8m Ul~ 78.7 TO BRICK .t:IQIE;. THIS SURVEY ,$ FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF \ THE. INDIVIDUALS. CORPORAllONS. AND/OR PARTIES NAMED THEREON. AND STANDARD OF WORK FOR SURVEYOR BASED UPON I "NORMAL" STANDARD OF CARE REOUIRED BY lAW \ " 1- + LOT 2 ,".><J..'J. t>"'~c .. \"!>'2-.0 c ,~" ."!>o~ ~'Orc;,:>'O.<fC" ~~ ~'" '" \ \ \~ r \ \ ., ~tO. LOT AREa. 17,700:1: S.F. (MORE OR LESS) PROPOSED TOTAL. IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3525:1: S.F. PROP SED COVERAGE:20% .f''' :&Rt:lIHG;. AREA OF PRESUMED OVERLAP Of ADJACENT PLATS AS EVIDENCED BY DUAL MONUMENTATlON (UNCAPPED IRON PIPES) .-- __ Jt:..(~- -- LOT l-S WD-FRAME WALK-OUT FIN FLOOR=I00.0 ASSUMED DATUM ~.iPiiQpOSiD 123001 CONe .. ~ o ~I~ 22,0 5' unulY EASEIlENT " N90'00'OO"E 204, o "!1!; NS y/[)-FRAME WALK-OUT @ 29.8 '~ t~ "t;,..~ ~ / v v ~y ""9'0 ~ ~<!>> <::> '( ...0 '/ 1(.. . J' ~!>~~/....Il 17_vlt. ...'..'/.sf}~ u .? ~..;> '/ C$" '0 is. <}:<'/'.' .,,,0 \ ~~ 't,~ / ,4" \ . (\10. ~ \ \1\7 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~~ \ \\~ \ ~~. \ 'b.. \.. ~ \~ ~ \" ~1O W. . \'i ~ \~ ?> \~ ~~ \" III \ \ ---- \ ~ w -------- \ 67.5 _____$''''-___...15 I .. .,,'IJ1.' 1fJ>~ PORCH ROCK PATIO ~~ry /' .~ / N ~ . N BEARING SYSTEM ASSUMED SCALE IN FEET . . I I I I o 20 40 60' l.E.WlIl X SPIKE (NAil) SET . 'RON MONUMENT FOUND o IRON PIPE SET )!!:. NAil & BRASS DISK SET X25.0 SPOT ELEVATION ASSUMED DATUM (EXCEPT WHERE NOTED) REV. 05-04-02: ADDED HSE TO SOUTH: COVERAGE CALC. DAN & SHELLY PLUNKETT 2300 INDIANA AVENUE M. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 612-296-1970 872 :002 SURVEY & MAPPING SPECIALISTS REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED I HEREBY CERlIf't lllAT liltS DRAWING REPRESEN11; ~ S VEY lllE RE L 11; Clf SUR'lEY PREPARED BY lIE UR OR B 0 UN MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND I ;;'f~'f UI~SED PROfESSIONAL SURVEYOR SPF;CTAT.TSTS 'ER llldL'IWS ~!lllE STAlE Clf,.JII~': TA . ~ !ll.JIM'IING . ~ IlESCRlP1KlNS :) , l.I' Z- . CONS11lUC1ION STAIOHO . . SU8OMSION PLA1S KfllNElH G. tfOI..MBECK- - 1[: - 'lOLL fREE (171) 727-ot" FAX (3ZO) 154-011t CE:N1ffIL IIN (DO) 255-0m p.o. 80J 4M t.tINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO. 18890 1M ~ (m) J41-017t SMJ( ,AfII)S. ... !!IU7I . . . . . . ~w.d.gOMm_vlt~ Y 5-14-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 2300 Indiana Avenue North Daniel Plunkett. Applicant Daniel Plunkett, with property located at 2300 Indiana Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition onto the existing home. This construction project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 3.1 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 11.9 feet at it closest pointto the south side yard property line for the proposed garage addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday, May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. -, .. I. f . 401 France Avenue North 02-5-25 . Jon and Bernice Swenson . .. . '". . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 401 France Avenue North (Map 8) (02-5-25) Jon and Bernice Swenson, Applicants Date: May 22, 2002 Jon and Bernice Swenson, with property located at 401 France Avenue North, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a room and deck addition onto the existing home. A variance was granted in 2001 for a rear yard room addition. Now the applicants have amended their building plans and would like to request additional variances for their building project. Also, during the construction planning process, a recent survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home also does not meet setback requirements. The survey submitted for the 2001 variance request was not very accurate because we did not require an as-built survey after previous additions to the home. As a result, it is necessary for the applicant to request some variances for the existing home. This project requires variances from the following section of City Code. · The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7{C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 70 feet or less, the south side yard setback shall be 20% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 9.77 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 4.23 feet at its closest point to the south side property line for the proposed deck; for 6.3 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 7.7 feet at its closest point to the south side property line for the proposed room addition; and for 1.77 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 12.23 feet at its closest point to the south side property line for the existing home. · The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 25.3 feet from the property line to a structure. The requested variance is for 9.5 feet off the required 25.3 feet to a distance of 15.8 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed room addition. . . . Previously, this property received variances. In December of 1980, a variance was approved for this property to construct a room addition to the existing home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant received a variance to build the room addition up to 7.4 feet to the rear yard property line. The requirement is for the building to be setback 25.4 feet from the property line. After receiving the variance, the homeowner did not build the addition. In June of 2001, variances were approved for this property for the existing home and for a room addition to the rear of the home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant received a variance for the existing home to be located 9 feet to the north side yard property line (note: a survey for the property dated May 7, 2002 now shows that no variance was necessary for the north side yard). A variance was also granted for a room addition to be located 18 feet to the rear yard property line. As was previously stated, the applicants have amended the building plans for the 2001 variance request. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in March of 1939 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 401 France Avenue N Jon and Bernice Swenson, Applicants . -- uOI- --j :- - ':""""4 --: i'.!.~:.!- -~~ i-- -llCi+-~\ ..: l! ~ ~ ~ ~ "'~I. -I I , I 1 I I ~_~.U_'!.O!' '----,'&---" ----~ --..I.'t:----:~\!.I:.-:==.:+ _ ~I . ~"':\I~ s: ~l u \M. ,;' I"''''I''.~~'' Z~'.7' I' I........I:~~ ~, . ,,: I ~.;~~. I~~~~~~~' ~~~ :....;:~.~.d-. :11.' f=t: ~- i fii.~~_~~ ~~.....~ ~ ' I I ~ r , 14...401 .~';'$_."I ..~\i' In~~'.... '.I,,\;;'si' III.",.;' ~ 1 I ,.........,-..11'..... ,,_ ,. . Ila . I! lls.;p:r".... J .... '''.r..' i&.i ',..Ill ' ;'L~l~,' & ~ ~ ~ I 11-' "\.) I ~ I "'"..:' I"~<: ~i ' .'lz...., I'lo,~: . ~ ,- ~ ~ 'I~ I" ~ ~*,~,~.i""::~L;~Cl~~;:~tU;.~<LL~.;~:~, . ~ - I: ': i"\ :r .:l: ,"'.. 'lit<.,l!ll . Cl~ ;,~Il' . ,.,,,"3.'!:!; 1'" .... 14 I .1~':'li~~r~ .~t.!~j .~~~.. :SO.~t 1 IIR~H I&~ ni--' -lUt!.l~-, ~ ..."n.l ;i..:u'1~__-. II i.) 1 I '- I, I ! 'I"n~ ~ 'Ils,,~l' '" ~.u~.... "' l'~!,;i =.!,. ..:.~ 1 . "'_I~'''' , '$ 4117 ~U.2~ t'n !~9.P~IOC~ . ~ ~v .: L 1- .L~.. . ., h-~ !";' L':!~-i '~~"t1olifl~ l i.)" r~~~~ hra s': fs~ 54ls3 Sl SII'lo 4'1: '!"'r~ ~~~. p.aa!~~,I~ i':)la l~~ : ".., i -\. ',' . .: . 'I .\ 'I"; . ".... _ ~1I'! ..m""'lGi ~ .i,. ."" - - . . 'i~ ~~~ JlO ":j\' , , '.;I' '-!" - '.. "" i!! ~~: \....1'"' i1&.~~~_ _I' ~ I u.~ !I ,.;I:, "'i ~ !--"" i'll .. . lo~.j' .~"'.; ~ ~. ._~ .~ ~Ilo\. ~"':li S1 :1Il'l~J' 41~. ,4~ "J+S ~ ..~, ' iu...l'~., S :.~':-l~. ,::.~., ~ ~l'! i- .!~ .1 ~ ~ ;-; ;p~ .w.~.. ' 1!'a..: ~ =' ~~~ .. . I~" .,' "~I. ,....1001 ~..~ ... .-;;;.. . - !~i IU . ... r. i '!":. :l1" . 104 . ;"..1" , ~ I." )11 '. ~,..~I_~_ ~ ~' : . 1 ., :J, .. .~; 103m.: . ~JIJJ' "i '. )11",.1 41'1.,;": It,: II ...>>' {II ~1;,,~1' _3~pw.;.~..' ':w.~.:..l :i i ~~p 1~ '~H- ~'.'lol,",~ loo-:-'~' ~...J . il4':,~ i1I...il. ,"f." .i ,Ii.. !t.IiiJ& ..~;1H' ,\,,)01 ' ..II".. "'a . :"..""~. .. ~., , ~ --~ ..1Ji_... l!l i r-'-=.- >>--...- C ~~. I ~~ ' I ~il!J JI-~ '~ i 'i "~"J1 W". 1",11.'; )ol,;'M'. 'Io'.;.~ . 41i."..: ~ . 4J s,~ j," 'r '1111 B" 1411~ ~ 1RuC'! . 1U~3' j !itUl,~o..L' ~t" . . ~ C , '. ,l!i~ . " ~,~ ~ ~J ~/2.! . ~~ ~ '" "1.!.i ~ ~~~,. ~i01';:~ ~ 4"~~ ~ ( ~~.';'f~"M"~. ~ ~ 4f)1. . ""'_..... SfJlfI .~ ( ;;;:: Inltal;'..J,...rvr~ .....: ,"M.R'''('~ " ...... I ~ . -.~ - _..: :....' 8g0'. .:'Jl $ ~'rr .;:;..~ ~q, . .,;:' no ''.. I;!~ t.1.1 5\ (~llf -,...~ --C ! ; l ."o~ ~:;; E. ~~ AA':>~ ~ ~~. fa.. 4 ,;. t';~~ ~::. c:: I. ~. G 2 '( p c... C I ., no -.. ,,_ ~,~." .. c tY',~ qj~!'.. ~O. . 1 ~ "~ ;0;....". .. '~ll.l;""~-- 0" ~..'ir '}~l::.'l! "-'!' Il..~ .~ N ~ .~;;;. ~ s; ... 1 .( ~f'~~"''''~~,r~rJ~ B ~'QI~ 1 St .... ~ '~lC-~ .2-~, !!; : '." ~~:i1i-:~~;lti~ ."'el'~~ ~~ ~~.j;;,~: .. · 1l1.~1 , 1..~'!i ,,~D ~';'~I 1.10 ~. ft.. ~ '......Mjf:~!Jt40 11".6. ~ti i'$.fl I.., ... ~ ,,~ ::) ~-.:R J:..lr. ~ 1~~~~-<o!"~"'1' ~~ ..,.:....,,.. ~'''.I(_ F..q::--JV~. -.. .l\l~'l ~". ,~:'~,':! C.~ =-~. .1..1'\~J!ll.!'I"I. 'TOl.Jdr.ft'~ 'I .." II, '. .. L:t -...... ".2 I ~\ ~). .... ." z]o . 0,. "~ .. , ~ .. ~ . i . \. . ...ll ~":I1u "'.... .i : -.,i.". '~'" ......", ~ '~"i .,~ 'i ~ -f,;.!/4.... ",-i, - i ~ - · i ~~'IO'. . --3 f J .~. ~ 2 I ~ ~ ~ I t\ ~ _ ! ~ J';.,,~~a1.~ /. . :- J~ 11:)/2.7.11' ~IO:.. .. tMEADCW ,.~I" "'~'- .J!"'"Ar,.' I -,,011, tlBi':6..,"E C;. ~$.. ~i,-:- LANE ,.'/MANOf ..L_~~'~ ~ ...~:~~ I ~ V ~ 't....of .- '$:'-; ,p.. zoq ,..' .. j, ~S"~Jo' ~ ,. . ..~';"V: .. - 010.' ;Vl. I.. l . 5 1 -4 ~~. /llnrr\ .i!!~.. Vj Q). ~ ::;: . \ 1 ' I b II "ADON. "l ....zd IA.';,' 1/:. 3C4.$ .44.. no 4" 1#..... 1Io';..j,j.' 13S -SlrtT.tO"E ^-39 .,,- -~ i, ~ ~ ..""-.. ~C;'. "". 135.43 ~ ~V. ___L'tOJ__. I ~ ~ r-....Vi:; ;:"!:S8'.'S'( wc 4..."tV, ~ ~ .~" i -oNlrmO"E _ ~ ~ ~ ~c;~'1 m ~ == 1 ~ .~'ie.'-' 3 ~ u.'.m;:. - ~i40IU:,:O ~~2~:;; ~. . ~ a.... e' '" Se"13'U <t so ;,.!"'i41.80 ~;;;'J'l~ 1,~'4G.1 j:. ::-~- ~ 1I1"""'m rllo14!",SIf:.1 ~2'I'i ...."..,.ll.W.. ~ "'0. ~'O ~ ,I ~TREM~L TT';'~.~~~;.~ . ::~22'o ;~.... m ..\ ~ ;!.,:.-....ii~ ~\1I4.40~/,,~ :i~~<;)' ~;; .. . .../ ' 61"11." 't ~...: '" . - " . ... . -.., - ~ .0,;:; I. ~. ~!\..:.Is.rtlk. l! ~ " ~=:.li"lO""1S.n"89~~'w I~U8 Vi "'$$. IJI....- '. (.I.. .. ~.!1A"""" #0 I .zoO H ,'24'4.'...i"'4 ~ 1lP'1 ~\ ~IO~~~;';t~ 401:$ I '-011 =1 ."". ': S" . ltJ _ ~ i!"~ I ~ =!.~~TE~RAr.F l">>J. - I . ( l ( Industrial . Other . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0 ).. - 5" - ). ~ Date Received 5 '1- 02, Amount Received SO. W ($50 residential- $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 40! PIl A AleE At/E It/ 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: -.JVAJ 4 tsFR"v' IcE _~U/~<~/ Name /./0; r==RAAlC CAvefi/ ~v: MN(~~",2 Address . City/StatelZip (b12- -7Lt3-~~~t!: 7~~- 371-0.373 Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): LCVLf~q ~! 71v couf( ~o~.rd rf Lt)~ LlOf' ' f..,.. /;-/(p ,c fA" Co"! J ".t)A~}{f;"J (,t~! 7n ttJ 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: )( Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration{s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approyedand cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. :"""t... !l~l,; ,1// l\Arl,t..,. <[ ~~,.P ., ~;,(=.., ,. ,,~, 1" ,- i ,.. ""," . I, .;.. I ~'r'l"\ .,e l f'v" C/ 8. (Staff will complte this item) Waiver of Section Subd{s). Subd{s). Subd{s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. . Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. .. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE. WAIVER EXPIRES. . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name GAarle.s ~ ~ '1e~n JJ~I md.rk- Comment q..k ~~ i ~ F.I~ Signalur~~ Address ~/7 -9~~. ~ Print Name . Comment . Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . . . Jon M and Bernice Swenson 401 France Ave North Golden Valley, 55422 To the Board of Zoning Appeals; May 7,2002 After receiving a variance last summer to build a studio on the west end of our house we have tried to re configure the plans. However in order to have an exterior entrance that is in harmony with the flow of the rest of the building and lot we need to have a variance for approximately 2' 6" for the addition and 5'4" for the deck/landing that the door from the new addition will step out to. Bernice meets with museum and gallery curators and collectors to show and discusses her work. It is more professional to have a direct entrance to the studio than to expect a curator to have to traverse through a family home; Furthermore when we have to move supplies, materials, and furniture in and out it is essential that we have a exterior door that goes directly into the space. By having the door face east we can minimize the steps up to the space. The fifteen and more years that we have invested in the south side garden are evident in the elaborate cut and laid paving stones and the lush carefully chosen perennial vegetation. An integral part of this setting is the 14' wide deck that now exists but will be rebuilt in a new long narrow configuration. In order to use the two different doors that open onto this area (one into the new addition and one in the existing house) and be able to use this deck as a seating area it should be 8' wide. This would leave 4' 10" to the property line beyond which is a steep drop to the level below. The south neighbors house is approximately 7' lower than the patio level of our property; We look out at her garage roof. The garage at this point has no windows and there is no danger of infringing on her privacy as this is an out of the way corner that she doesn't use. Without these variances we will have to throw out all our plans and began over which will mean that we may not be able to start this year if at all. As was stated in the fIrst variance request we have to pay a considerable expense in studio rent and we think the only way we can financially afford a studio into the future is by having it as an extension of our residence. Thank you for your consideration; Jon and Bernice Swenson CBRTlFlCATB 01' SVRv.r FOR: Job SJre~OD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 409 and the south 30 feet 01 Lot 408. GLENJrOOD. 'Hennepin Co un ty. Minnesota. LOT North line of the south 30 feet of Lot 408 Cl V .g :3 l/) l/) :3 o o~pop ~ :Q AdjaclInt HouslI 407 I I /417 I 839.2 x ~ _ _ _ ~ S 8~1~7" E __ LOT " x 845.7126 43 u T/x 8J9.4 "03 4 -, . Bricl< '-I1etaining wall x 839.5 I~ I~ F-- . 903 It) 10.6 "! I I can t.........: ....~. I 15.8.0 :t. lQ I 6.0 I b"? - - -~ - -trI ~ EXISTING 13.6 ,~ HOUSE 'b"O~~. 1401 of. U' 49.4 'b"'l-'? 1- 4 0 8 !::r:l o .., 844.6 It of. ~9 'b" 10 ~ 2; , ~~. ~ ,p'? ~ of. 409 49.3 .. I~ ..0' ~ I~ fence x II) 1 /- i ...: 6' fJ ..0' ~ LOT 48.7 Briel< Retaining wall 126.59 S 89012'22" E 410 --..-., o Denotes iron monument X eoo.o Denotes existing elev. - Denotes surface drainage I ~!~ -1 ... It) $)0 .0 If! :d + >c ~ >c !::r:l ~- It i c;::)Q t c;::)~ ~ .Q ... c;::)Q :3 l/) l'-~ l Q e tf) 01 ~ It) - ~ oi " ~I~ :iJ 'I) ~ .., -8'): lQ >c Cl"8 >c .!~ >> ~ i 0_ .E ~ ~ e a, 01 <1..... o 0 BENCHMARK: Invert Sanitary Manhole at Cl Cl France -and WoodstocK-Elevation=825.28 DEIIARS~GABRlEL 1J SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. PlYmouth, UN 55447 Phone:(763) 559-0908 I hereby certify that this survey, pion or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered land Surveyor under the lows of ~e of Minnesota. . <:-~ David E. Crook ~ Date: ..5/fJ' ~~ Minn. Reg. No. 22414 File No. , , 669 Book-Page 399-76 Scale , , =30' . . . ~ Board of Zoning Appeals Page 2 December 9, 1980 explained that the street is not developed to full width and in .t considering the topography, it will not be widened in the Mr. Perssons sf of the house of the front lot lin would still be 40 feet back The longer the driveway 0 is site, the more diffi Mr. ~nd Mrs. Kastor participa in the plan re and in 15 feet existing street. it is to construct. discussions. During furthe scussion, Mr. Perssons described the proposed in depth s approximately 21 feet deep for the garage portion. effe unning from front to back on the property with maximum trees wth maintained. The vote was called on the motion and it carried 80-12-70 (Map 8) Residential 401 France Avenue ~orth Ronald R. Moody The Petition is for waiver of Section 3.07 (2) of the Zoning Code, for rear setback for 7.4 feet off the required 25.4 feet (20% lot depth) to a. distance of 18 feet from the rear lot line to the proposed house addition. Mr. Moody was present, the petition was in order, consent had been obtained from all adjacent properties. Mr. Moody explained in his petition that they were previous owners of a home at 630 Sunnyridge Lane which was acquired and removed in the HRA area. The previous home was on three lots and had a three-car garage. They purchased this smaller home to stay in the area. Mahlon Swedberg noted the proposed addition puts this home generally in Hne with adjacent properties, proposes no signiflcant impact on the areat and also noted the placement of the existing home which requires setback waiver to provide any constructive additions. It was moved by Mahlon Swedberg, to approve the waiver as requested, second by Art Flannagan and upon vote carried. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 26, 2001 Page 3 .. S er asked if the shed being thatclbse to the garage is more of a building code matter and not a zo . g code matter. Olson stated that the City Code states that there has to be 10 feet between the str ures. Roger Ost, licant, stated that his wife had just passed away the previous Thursday an at she is the one 0 wanted the deck and now he would like to have it even more and a d' the board to please c sider his request. McCracken-Hunt aske 'f his intent was to still carry through with his original pi . Richard Banks, 1545 Ottawa Ave e stated that he is the neighbor that would proba be most affected by the proposed deck and sees no problem with it. Hughes stated that the applican entioned that the survey is off by oot in the front. Ost stated that the survey is off by one foot an that the existing home is act y 35 feet from the property line, but on the survey it shows 34 fee McCracken.Hunt state at they should go with the dimension on the registered survey. Sh er recommended' he applicant that he talk to the surveyor and get a corrected copy. Hughes asked if the applicant planned to still ha ramp, or if it would just be a deck now. Ost stated that originally, his plans were to build just ck but as his wife got progressively worse they changed it to a ramp, but now it would pr bly ve stairs. He stated that he may need a .ramp in the future because he is partially h Icapped. ell stated that the Board has turned down requests for decks in the past with' mailer amoun the deck going into the front yard than what is being proposed. Ost stat that there is no othe lace to put a deck. Sell stated that if the applicant were to build the de ith the handicap ramp h ouldn't have a problem with it. Ost stated that he would agree t uild the deck with the ramp on s the original request states. Shaffer stated that the City been allowing open decks in front yard . Ost stated that the deck would only be 18 inches . ,no higher than the steps that are already th Cera asked about th istory of allowing decks in the front yard. Shaffer state looking at each 0 Individually, but distances haven't been clearly defined, and 1I0w front yard variances. ell, seconded by Hughes and motion carried unanimously to approve the re ested with the condition to allow an 8 foot deck to a maximum of a 26 foot front yard se t the deck is to remain open with a handrail only, and not to be closed in. 401 France Avenue North (Map 8) (01-6-14) Jon and Bernice Swenson. Applicants . Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, S'ubd. 7 (C) (1) Side Y~rd Setbacks · 1.5 feet off the required 10.5 feet to a distance of 9 feeffor the existing home at its closest point to the north side yard property line. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 26, 2001 Page 4 . · 8.5 feet off the required 10.5 feet to a distance of 2 feet for the existing deck at its closest point to the south side yard property line. · 3.5 feet off the required 10.5 feet to a distance of 7.5 feet for the proposed addition at its closest point to the south. side yard property line. Purpose: To bring the existing, home into conformance with side yard building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of an addition to the existing home. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (B) Rear Yard Setbacks · The requested variance is for 9.6 feet off the required 25.4 feet to a distance of 15.8 feet for a proposed room addition to the rear year property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a room addition to the rear of the existing home. Olson referred to his memo dated June 20, 2001 and stated this is a request for an addition to the existing home to allow for an art studio. He stated the property owner had received a variance in . 1980 to construct a room addition, however, after receiving the variance the hom. eowner did not build the addition. He stated the existing home does not meet the setbacks. He stated that in 1995 the homeowners did an addition that according to the survey, doesn't seem to conform. Shaffer asked if the 1995 addition received a bUilding permit. Olson stated that it did and it was approved to meet the setbacks, but according to the survey it is a foot and a half off. He stated the survey i$ from 1980 and the applicant probably drew on the existing survey the additions since 1980 and what's being proposed now. John Swenson, applicant, stated that the survey that shows the 1995 addition is the survey they received from the building department and the only thing he drew on the survey is the proposed addition. He stated that both he and his wife are professional artists and they have to have a studio to do their work in. He stated that right now they are renting space and with their anticipated retirement they would like to stay in the house they are in and stabilize that expense. He stated they looked at several different possibilities for this addition and that what they are proposing is the most usable space for them. Bernice Swenson, applicant, stated that if they weren't able to add on to the house, they would have to compromise the existing structure of the house or eliminate bedrooms or garage space which would affect the value of the home. She discussed her teaching career and stated that this studio space is a necessity and that it's not for gallery space or for customer sales, it's more office, work and research related. . MCCracken-Hunt asked if the City' has looked at how ij meets the ordinance regarding home occupations. Olson stated ,it's more of a personal space or home office and they won't have . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals June 26, 2001 Page 5 customers or employees so they meet all the regulations and this really isn't considered a home 'Occupation. Hughes asked why the road in front of the house is not paved and why there is no address on the house. John Swenson stated they have the house numbers, they just haven't put them on the house. He stated he didn't know why the road wasn't paved, but that they like that way. Shaffer told the applicants they are required by city code to have numbers on their house. Sell asked the applicants if they builtthe deck on the south side of the house. John Swenson stated he did build the deck in 1985, but didn't ask for a variance or a building permit at the time. Sell stated that he is concerned about there only being two feet from the existing deck to the neighbor's property line. John Swenson stated there was a five feet drop from their property to the neighbor's property and that there is a fence there now. Hughes asked if under the 20' x 34' ~ddition would be a carport. Swenson stated that it would be more of a parking spot and that they would drive underneath the addition to get into the garage. Shaffer discussed the variance given in 1980 and stated he's concerned now that this proposal goes two feet further out than the original variance. He stated that if the addition went out 18 feet it would.be more in line with the neighboring home, but he's concerned aboutit being bigger and being within 7 feet of the property line that it would encroach quite a bit into the whole area. Hughes stated that he felt that such a large structure so close to the alley would be overbuilding. Shaffer asked what the setbacks are from an alley. Sell stated there are none and it's assumed that 20% of the distance between the structure and the back property line was sufficient as far as the clearance for an alley. John Swenson stated that in the records it showed that the original variance request was for a 20 x 28 feet addition and asked why that's not okay now. McCracken-Hunt stated that the paperwork the Board has shows the variance was granted for 18 feet, not 20 feet, from the rear lot line to the proposed house addition. Swenson stated he would be willing to change his plans to allow for an 18 foot addition instead of the requested 20 feet. Sell stated he would Ii~e to see a new as-built survey and would also like to see an elevation showing how it relates to the existing structures and how imposing the new addition would be. Swenson stated he did submit plans with his variance application. Olson showed the board the plans the applicant submitted. Shaffer stated he would be willing to grant the same variance that was granted in 1980 and to not grant the south side yard variances. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve an 18' variance off the rear yard setback, to approve the variance of 9' to the north side yard setback and no variances granted to the south side yard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . www.ri.~Um_vlt~ Y 5-14-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 401 France Avenue North Jon and Bernice Swenson. Applicants Jon and Bernice Swenson, with property located at 401 France Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct a room and deck addition to the existing home. These building additions require variances from building setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, a survey of the property was submitted and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following sections of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 70 feet orless, the south side yard setback shall be 20% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 9.77 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 4.23 feet at its closest point to the south side property line for the proposed deck; for 6.3 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 7.7 feet at its closest point to the south side property line for the proposed room addition; and for 1.77 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 12.23 feet at its .closest point to the south side property line for the existing home. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 25.3 feet from the property line to a structure. The requested variance is for 9.5 feet off the required 25.3 feet to a distance of 15.8 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed room addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday, May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. .. , ~ io . 6620 Olympia Street . 02-5-26 . ShaunGraham . ... 9 . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 6620 Olympia Street (Map 15) (02-5-26) Shaun Graham, Applicant Date: May 22,2002 Shaun Graham, with property located at 6620 Olympia Street, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a 2-story room and garage addition onto the existing home. In addition, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home also does not meet building setback requirements. This project requires variances from the following sections of City Code. . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request is for .2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.8 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Olympia Street for the existing home; for 30.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 4.9 feet at it closest point to the front yard property line along Hampshire Avenue North for the existing deck; and for 19 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 16 feet at it closest point to the front yard property line along Hampshire Avenue North for the existing home and for the proposed 2-story room and garage addition. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(8) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 28.7 feet from the property line to a structure. The requested variance is for 4.7 feet off the required 28.7 feet to a distance of 24 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed 2-story room and garage addition. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in March of 1946 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 6620 Olympia Street Shaun Graham, Applicant . ~r~~'~-' "'\,;~$ . "'."., 1:: \ s--.____ - ". ~ \" .!3 ~ \ <'! II ~ 0 '9 ' - ---- ,": IZ~ ;: "\1-.. ~ ~. ,g ".. /I~ .,: Ji.i ~. \,.. 11' {:I' B iF ~~'-'~.1 1% \ ~ $So~". 1l', "- . . --- . :--_ \ ff> ' ~ .7, . . :(S4..~.. ~~~O~I~: ~...,> 'If. ,5.~:-... " I .' a. :.; /~ ~,. ,<\; .: '. _ 't:I rs>. . .4 ...t...... ,." S. \ ''''lil --. -~ . n.' 'Ii .1 "- 10 ~ \.~ "IL "'!J ,~~; k ~~ S : .~~'#" \~':-"'>-_ ~ ~'I -' "-. ., ).1~ . \ . .... I'" " '~ t.... "'! - , . - 0 'S! 3''' " ~J: - .: ...os 4 _ ., "I" .'.. ~ I! '.!: !;q.~ I 8" . .-' ~ 9Y:~-'.S ' ..'f"{!I$" 5:' ., : .. i.: Z "'J~'" ... .t!~'" ,.",.fA J. ~ ~ "/.I' 'O';q; .....0 ~ .' ~_' ItS \" Ill!.. c;, ~ \~ ~ :\:. I~~b:.~ '.'" A/..." ,t';:" ~ .~. ~'r~'{o..J~'. 'IST~::---2 .~l!!," ., A. .~ .~~ 51 ! ~ .;1" ~ o. ;;:- ~......;~~ t4".4' 0 '.'^. ~'O . IS.'.. .. 5...~.. '~Q '1; (;J!..... ! .:e....:!!! ~ 10 ~ ~ Z 0 ,... I % .;t .....~.,. "~ ~j,(.'o "'0 i. l I ..~l!~ -:I . ~ IJ' >>/ oS -., ". ~ \.. _ 14 .4 :A . '" ~ li! . \ 'ZI., 4 ,. ,. '" '.41 .j.""'" . .. ,;n,n; N' : "", ~ I !50 . . . I' - !50 W lU.,.." ~. . 1 - "I" .. 150 !Co- t :.;-' ~ -~ ~U~. '! l"~ ~- ~. ...... ...!.:":t'.' ' :7.Z~I~Z~~ t!4" %~_: 2~ z: 1I'f..' 18..11; " : I? 14~ Il'!'~ .~ 11'3'11" I~'. 8~ 1~ ,~S ~4:; 3... Z;~I: .~ ~ ~.. ~:. .. ':;'. 3 ;a.- "i.~ .,s..... . ~~ ;,.:1; .:::!I....u.'s. "~.So rr.1 Ie.. ..:I.. ..~.... ..~'ka n.l~.... 0.. .. ........... ..~. "oSo ::: 'SI1 67S0 . ~ 6700 .~"I(, ... 'r ~/. 6411 ~4'0 .142 11411-8) ~ '7 - 6= ,.::L. .... 6_ HII ._ _ 631S .SDS oR! " "3" "::!':'.~ &&J 'I/,'~ ";.".r;:!:.~ ~~',II~I~ . :"~ " ,"!'1 ..:"I~:'. ";t. ~ "~ 't 1r:.;,t, :,s=~ ~ JJ~ 1~'~ ,$ '\:!! r. i~J~ :,.4"-: ,.~:J ,~,i ~..l,f 9ZJ.~r:'1 'F.r" J ..:: I~ ,~.~"\ I...... .... .--:" o:('l!, ,. ..... tj!e ...,::.., ;~.. 1"'::-1.. 1"-i!io!Q 11:.... ..~t.. I ~~. w. -,. ..~.. .._I.. .....~ 1__:-.3. I ! IJ I d ", ~ - =!,i ~'I S; -; ;1 I ~ : I~ ~ ~ 1~ IZ~'tlllto ",lltn '1'1 IIfJII411~iIZ:,r:\I0:aJ ~'O"'01 'o'hS:'O~'.O!:J:lldf-:IOI'J:" ,Ii,'!. .~.~: ll. fll T . ~ 'T ~ : Ii. ~-.~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ .::. . ~ .. .. ..::!:.. ..~IS. ..I...~.. ".~, Sls.;!~ L~~ $'.i..l:ts. ...:;"z'$e~" ..~... 50;: . .:::0.:' ...7 .~ 1:.:!~. ~SO" .:~ .4Q:40:400 ..~~~. ...-:/~.n7 "SOO.x. ~ '~'~"1 }"~~?~ ~"lS.r" :J' j~~ ."i'" .~".~ '..!il"r:.~":'r~,5o~ Fr"ll~d :", 11~11 t:.' '~1Zoln 114111 (11," 111 11' I19JI.i;l~ II ~Ij.l'~ l.illS~ i'S.I:.'II,' ISfllSlll.'f. I",~,~r:li~ 11 ~ · ...... : ~. e;.,. ....... .. == . i . ,; . - ..l!!l ~~~- E: .1 " ,.J" · I.. !~ Xi s. -:':.. "l;o ~o ~JC' ~.:! . I. '. I. s.'.. ':. ...l;II... .!i:"; ,'" ~ I iY'V I ~ ~ ~~ I ~ : f ;; ~ ~'5 - J ~ ~ .1;; ~I~ :~ 13 ZI~~~ ~ ~ ~IUZ~ 2/ ~Zl 1 ,"f ~i:l .~o~ :s ~ ~ r: j20~ :i :~ Z; ~~ :' :1 It ~'te ,,~,,~ ~.S! ," ~'1i.i.:!J .;,!".- ~~ s. !40~:i.. .!t!" ~~ 50 li1l .;::0, "!!!!" !;. !~. ~s,; ~ 67:>0 67. &&J "Rb' IJ$2O .SOI1 . ..... Hili '....64....... /Ul!()nls ~S11! SSOD' d . Z"'ff" SD .. It 'I'/'SZ. 70 ~ ."il'" 7Z . I C I I, . ... 2'/5.Z5Re$. ... . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0 )... - ).;... :l. f.c Date Received 5/8/0;1, Amount Received 5- 0 . 00 ($.50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: i~ ~)D 0 ~'-(' fI1 //11 5;T Qji,{, BZA Petition Date /I1A't:.LI-I ~, Petitioner: ~fll4v~ (;,br#t4/"1 Na",m,' e I '," ' , (p ftl W uL---Y J?'1t'/ A ' Address , Il -lYl-S-St'3 Business Phone 2. 3. S'T. b~L-/)p.J 1//44U7 / "City/State/Zip' 7 (.o? 3 - S LS- - 7 lt7 i Home Phone SS'lZ7 . 4. If petitio"ner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): 1.01 ~O'~ ~ l& Uvtokf-r 6. Type of property involved in this petition: .i / . Residential: -"/ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling I nd ustrial Commercial Institutional Other. Bus. & Prof. Office 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. ~, The site. plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepar~d by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings~ and streets. . The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. . 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount off~ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. '(\ (' f: ,r,_. . I. /~-...\ .' I ! \ "i' r., ,( \'\.li \ ').' \(,{;v~~ '~gnature ojApplicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. -. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly acros,s the street. If on a comer, this . means across both streets. .' NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application forwaiver of . Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will.r~ceive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the projector other statements regarding the project.) Print Name .-;j:;> ~ L e J.}' J ~ e fl- Comment uJ Q H-I\- II E N cJ f!>'~ J ~-c /7& .'(IV h rtu · I .~ lZ-o J e--e {- Signature 7!J L1.A.1J-,d.uA-J Address ~ 7 () 0 ({)/""y If.(, r I 11- .\ -f l JA'1 . . Ay~~ LI W~ /-I"V;;J /) 61oj-< ~-I-Wt ~ Signature (f:r<;t..~ Address / <,'/ /J IfAl-I'IA;.... J/.J..<. M- Print Name-.Jo /) n n 7 0 b a k Print Name . Comment -J-v -;-)11 ~ Comment SignatureC# ~ , ~ 7l Print Name /rJ, cAn) L HCl AL~15' Comment ""N 0 . t7JiJFJ-Y/a..J< TO T fiLS:. PRCfIECT - OK. ~~" Signaturefi~e'~~. Address 0021 rJ,?~/1 s+ . Print Name-N~t _ A . . Comment ~ ~ ~~~\O~ ~":tlN7. y'h') ()~: $ .-"'\. d-o M; ~ CP-i!~. Signature../~~.f)4~ Print Name '1?'uJy S-rA I1C/l /: iC- lei Comment )I (/ {'}j, 'i ec.. TI 0 n - v " . Address fdc.t;I (!)W'.c-~ "<;t: Signatur~/j;~ALPf~/)tcL Address 6~/o C?~~ C/./.. Print Name Comment Signature Address ':. 'il, .. ., Print Na~ ' . "" Comment - '. ,. \ rII ' ~.... _:-' ." '. _~ . '...;. >," ~ .... ... "':"'1,... \. " ~; :L}..:l.., ~ ....w .. '>~t. _ .....'.... . . . . ,'\ .... ..... , Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . C;Y-la-'O?- . '-'-Co -THE. \SDA~O O~ -ZONI~G AP~G<S I N R~b A€.OS 'TO Iola -W OL-'-(vY\ VJ I t\ ~ T ) LoTS 2..0 ~ -z...l ~ELyY\CN 1 A. () 0 ( 71O'J ' WE.: "TO iHE- ~(Y\rv1ee. -zoo l \CE - fA\JjtJ&i V~o,)~-r .~) il-\8 ~Tetc7 USVAI'U(\J ~-JAS /"'c\'",}E~f) ~ '1 <6 I!'JC+\~.. \)S rEX, 0(: A ~I r-001 bR.\\J€wAl' 14AD 10 OC RUJAA(ED Vo\z AN N...l...xP1ABLE C::HZAD~ VROM ST~-U . A Rt-rAltJ ,rJb WALL \ Wlit-\ ~TePS 'FROM -n--\e. Del\J~yvA-r "'-0 ,He ~IO€ 1))0 (L or: 7H€'"" 14o\JS~) l-\AD 10 AL-~O ~\; ~MCVe:.O.. 'Bt,LAV~~ .,.-l-\e ~-rAI,.JINft 'WAlL- \t.JA~ IVOI LOW EtJOUft 14 -roA~O'(V\ATJA-re; 11-\8 t0€\i0 t:l-WA-rION.. or::- -n.'\~ CorJC\Ge1g S:0A €. ' H \ ~E, \) ., H €V ArJLOI'J c,Ol'JC\et:TE CJ:) TY\VJ AN~ -ro ~Y\'\oVE TH~ ~-rAlrJJN~ WAL\... i. 8l\!-neg- \)~\\JEWA'1' I -ro IHe &;A~~., AGUl2.IVJN &z A UN\ EO~M ~ft \=ort.. iHE D~\\.i~I,-.)AJ' , ,ANO ,A LoVJtt ~LEV AllaN f"ovc.. A tJE,\'J \<-~AJ;.JJtJb, WALL- , ?-e l1...A C\W TH~ 12..E7TAJrJJrJh. WAu....,) ArJD l&ult.;T A oe-L~ O\JE)t. -rK~ WA'-L Wi-rl-\oui A 'P~(Ly)'\\l- j\) O-r KNow A f'~VY\l-r WA ~ E~6::UI~--o , \ AM 'l'JoW ~\Jt-S-r/rJ'=1 A VACL\PotJ/..f F"o~ -n-te- Dt:L~ ... \ D\PtJ-r WAN, TO "FINArJLt . R ~Sr~L--r F\) l \./1 Sj-\AV~ Ge.AH~M ,. 5' - f.c, -- 0'2- . -- \ 0 --r+-le: ~Ae.O 01=- 2otJlrS~ tAPft~7ALJ; l t-.JD~ HAve A 900 'SQ,UA~ ~ H~~ ~rn-\ A J-,O I \-J"D~ 'f "'21) .~ G?Ai",ft8 .1 ~Ag.tc:::- '2... \)~I-hu.BS i~ 7t-lg: De\\)€" ANO orJ~ lrJ ,He, S;Teat BEZJa.use- . -r 1-1(; I S NO \ZoOM ~o{L A c..Ae I N [He::: C1 tA !LA" e ' \ \'0 OvL.O U~E LO $..~VV\UVE T~t:: f.;~~6~ y~ Y\'\. -r He \-\O\.6~ ArJ '0 ~Ul GO A ~t;; W IO~ ""1 ~<<B I Dts(? A,IALHeif.) 6At:.-A6€ /\1...)lTW '8>1.0 'f t..-v, L-1VIN~ SfA~ A&>JE. FOiL A MASTDL ~ R-oOM $ U \/6 l ~A M\ \..;-( \<00 (V\ . 1 HA\J~ Loo~ 10 \2€ PCA~ M"1. E'1-SIS/J~b 8o)'V\~. ~\.J1 JA.f7~ 'O\SCl.f:>S)orS..s \.,JI,H ~L~JA~ f\f.~v.J-r~ I AtJ AOOrTI~ lrJu\JL.D 13E AN )j\jU~-rMf1'!7 '"To A l-\oM~ l A&2€t\ r;,€Ob~Y'i-\ILAL\";'""1 JAP'PfALlrJl, I'D VV\-( WD~K- \ C.~t-hL.$S feE5€/07 ~I-\OOLH-J" SlILJA/Il)~ ' ) \,jOVL,1f) G\~8 tU S,/t-1 I r-J Il-H~- Ae8 A : BV1W~ A~ SIM'Pv1 OVl fJ~jr-5l:t. ouve.. : ~<;e;r-A StQUA~ kJu-rAb.e:- ?-E. ~ f'EZ.-r ~ u LL.-'-(' <:; rl-AvrJ b f?-A HAM . 885.B 886.0 Ie I I f I ~-- / N 89042'55"E 79,10 ''''''' ~ ~ f~~ ~ '~ ~' BBB.7 ~ _" ..22.0 <.:J ?i! ttj Mi r GARAGE .tb. 7.7 ~ :<; g.... '" 0. < "ojl,. gt.) ~ ~~I [ J f!T-F ~ B91.2 ,~'.5 Wood Doc. ~ " I e9t.l x N I N 80042'19" E Ie a91.6 . Lor 5 --...., 887.9 )(., \ \ \ ni --j..=-- , .!. , iuJ x 890.4 c liS!'r <0 Oe y- :<; ....0 ojl,.O t.)cl . '" t.)~ ~~ C~ Lor 19 "l )( 891.1 )( 89L9 'B.09 HOUSE ~ .. A.;}Jocent HO~$fJ . ;;; Q 15.0 _~lt ); 891.9,7.96 )( 892.3 ,.. "'" --1-. I (ogress Window Well (with steps) 01 .. .., I I l( 892.8 I / 78.90 / --' x 892.9 OLYMPIA STREET o - Denotes iraQ... monument X 000.0 Denotes existing e/ev. DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS. .INC. 3030 Horbor Lone N9. Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone:(76J) 559~0908 Fox. :(76:5) 559~0479 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 20 and 21, BELMONT, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify thot this survey. pion or report wos prepared by }TIe or under my direct supervision and that I om 0 duly Registered Land SurveY9r under the Lows of the State of Minnesota. tOJX 0 David E. Crook Dote: 9l24/ 0 1 Minn. Reg. Na.~ File No. 11472 B . Book-Page 401-43 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR Scale 1"=20' SHAUN GRAHAM . . . . . . . . . www.ri.goUm-ll~ Y 5-14-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 6620 Olympia Street Shaun Graham. Applicant Shaun Graham, with property located at 6620 Olympia Street, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a 2-story room and garage addition to the existing home. This addition requires variances from building setback requirements. In addition, a survey was submitted for this proposal and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following sections of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request is for .2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.8 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Olympia Street for the existing home; for 30.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 4.9 feet at it closest point to the front yard property line along Hampshire Avenue North for the existing deck; and for 19 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 16 feet at it closest point to the front yard property line along Hampshire Avenue North for the existing home and for the proposed 2-story room and garage addition. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 28.7 feet from the property line to a structure. The requested variance is for 4.7 feet off the required 28.7 feet to a distance of 24 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed 2-story room and garage addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday, May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. " " . 6808 Plymouth Avenue North 02-5-27 . Frederick Jones and Bonita Y urch . ... . . . Hey Memor~ndum Plann i 11~:~.;;jJ;........ 763-S93-809S/763-SY;)-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 6808 Plymouth Avenue North (Map 15) (02-5-27) Frederick Jones and Bonita Yurch, Applicants Date: May 22, 2002 Frederick Jones and Bonita Yurch, with property located at 6808 Plymouth Avenue North, are requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants own three platted lots: lots 318, 319, and 320 of the Belmont subdivision. According to the property survey, the existing home sits on lots 318 and 319. Lot 320 is a 50-foot wide vacant lot. The applicants would like to sell lot 320 so that a new single family home could be built there. In speaking with our City Attorney, Allen Barnard, he said that two conditions would need to be met for this to occur: the applicants would have to receive a variance for the east side of the existing home and the applicants would be required to remove a an enclosed deck on the west side of the home. This project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 6.6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 8.4 feet at it closest point to the east side yard property line for the existing home. As previously stated, if the BZA approves this variance, the applicant would be required to remove the attached enclosed deck on the west side of the home. The removal of the deck would restore a 15 foot building setback on the west side of the home. The removal ofthe deck should be made a condition of the variance approval. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in March of 1950 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 6808 Plymouth Ave N Frederick Jones and Bonita Yurch Applicants ' ~"'''~~^.<,-:-".".,_.__.. ,,,....'-'":~.-;...~-!:.-. ~ . . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number () :; - :5 "),7 Date Received 5/1/ () .l-.. Amount Received .s-v . ov ($50 . residential - $150 other). PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: c~~5c& f'j.,Y/JJ///1'7# /JJ//A/I/).7 #cP/2-/;H 2. BZA Petition Date //Jd Y 09 fi~o r>2- 3. Petitioner: r::e/E'LJr~/('!/j ~-. ~NEs... /,t3/A/'/7/:/ )... YtlltL!# . Name 6~at3 P.I. Y/JJP,//T# ./'1y~ /\'0. ~~7pf.JL;1.,/I//Jj..).$i /J7JL/.$li!;l.;? Address City/State/Zip I?v3'~3'7- /5;/0 /}LPS '"...?~<:?r.,-~.??~ Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is. not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): 6fimpp'-;- I ;t!..pr J/T .?/~ ," J,p{ v 6. Type of property involved in this petition: ReSi~~gle~~OUble DWelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. /. tJ~7~~~~,~~ ~~Z'f~ A~J';i'L)....~~PJ.;7~~. ..... h~,4zf.'~ ~. .~~ /~~~~.~~ ~. 8. (Staff will complete this item) ~ / , il Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings, and streets. Tile distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line Will be needed, if in question. Also. the svrvey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x. 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this a~li~tion are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $d.t?~ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THISWAIYER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means. across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Namey ber Comment OrlYlsPY / Signature Address ;; 8 J7 K"" II 5L. C. v, Print Name Comment /) rn u-n d 5 dl7 Signature f/JVhAF O/1??fM..da,,-- AQdre$S rP8::J.<) ftnIl SItuIj llr.ll ) I Print Name .I()~)/ f/',,qk~t. Comment Signature .4 7 I c, ......, J. Address r.:;/ D..:::7 ( . 11t1JOd~. ,q~.N Print Name <...<Stlt+teoA) M u. ~ Comment Signature 1!f?~ ~.. Address {..12,fi P1rjlffifllh fh}{J, N Print Name . Comment Signature t[ . v ;:.; L), t' If J'1,';- y r< ^ ~ At-P" -" 'f'(. 0J'yul 7 . Signature ~~~ <J ~<<' . Print Name -i ~ +<o~' \ Comment Signature (71''0 1<osJu' PrintName ;;fm'-- Iml1t~ / Comment: Signature Print Name Comment 11111:e-k-COhne I ~ Signature . (}e~v ;?/J? ~UA/T2EL Address ~ 7 JtJ' P/..vn6-':"'~ Ji i!J),'~> /v'.. , :j: Address a f\LV~~ ~/, N (b:; .:t' ~~\ l MN ~ (j t4 <=-'L-C 75 ELL Address b1:{1 f~~'f1c. Address 13lD J.er5Vj. Ave 0 Address Address b 7 tf3 Y)o U ~~ KlVo n ~ J.'rf'p(H.~(i liy . MPIN Of-neE 16121 ~).1" 7h19 . k SURVEIDRS. LAND '"'''''' ,,,,, """., I ,. IN<:. SURVEYING & LAND PLANNING . /ID,(,/ .eo""........'" -.ry-,,:-<J ~ ...._-:l " 5905 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD. GOLDEN VMLfY MN ~l5-t22 10860 WEST 175th SlREE1.lAKfVIUt: MN 55044 ~"\ '- <. ~ '- "'\.. .... Ce:RrIFICf1rG' OF "cor,' 8)1ii'4'l1tf,4 ~llt/lJ' .-~C} ?- 3cC> OESCR/PT/OA/ I "- "- lli ~ I ('or$ .:9/8 -.:9C'O, /.vr<</..-/v..-, 8Ft!:MOA/T, #F-<../..............-:z::.............. C'o"-""A..,,-'Y"Y,I- ~A/A/~.ror~ Sc,q~E:./'~ eo' o o...-:.....--C',.....~.~ RC::>,./ 'e hereby certify that this fl a true and correct representation 01 a survey of the bound9r1es of the land described abov Id of Ihe location of all buildings thereon. and all vIsible encroechments, il any. from or on sala land, thatlh.s survey wa 'epared by me or under my direct supervision and thai I am a aulv Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the SIal Minn~s ,.... surveyed by me Ihis /6':"" day Of ,A/"'....._B"""" , 19~ I.. n n (') ill .. , /7740"'- ~_nt: ____n___ __~ ... Mll'Il"llllsola Reo,s'f'II()1'I Ho /~t:#__ ,5"'......7' --- J[~l(.f,Uj ___.___ ClJI'f ~1 i. ._""__ A11I,"MI~.~_~O/.Jf =---~:!_.j?8 - /5""000- . ... ....ec...-;:;, .-""b...,'(-~ \~ I ~ ~ "- I II' I 10 i ~ Ii' t ~ i\ , ) ~ .; { .~ \ \ ~ "\}.t, f'/I(a._____ ~ !n -&V-VML:1L/r-H-----~E ---~-"---------- --~~~- " _~e I .~~" _<!'~ 4'7000/<cOO/ Vif:l"'l .._.-,.________. .____~__ " I I I I I I I I I I ; t I ,l ~ I ,~ r I 'I, " I I (:{,)7- ';/9 (~~)r 3/<"1 .'~'" ,-.... -/:rooo- . -~---, . . . . . . . . . W~'ci'~Mm_vlt~ Y HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 5-14-02 Frederick Jones and Bonita Yurch, with property located at 6808 Plymouth Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicants would like to split off a 50-foot wide lot from their property in order to construct a single family home on that vacant lot. The first step in this lot subdivision process is to request a variance from building setback requirements for the existing home. This construction project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. 6808 Plymouth Avenue North Frederick Jones and Bonita Yurch. Applicants . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part ofa dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 6.6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 8.4 feet at it closest point to the east side yard property line for the existing home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday, May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If ycm have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. , ,. . . 925, 955, and 957 Winnetka Avenue North 02-5-28 . Robert Venne . , . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: From: Subject: Date: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner 925, 955 and 957 Winnetka Avenue North (Map 21) (02-5-28) Robert Venne, Applicant May 22, 2002 Robert Venne, with property located at 925, 955 and 957 Winnetka Avenue North, is requesting variances from the Light Industrial zoning code (Section 11.35). The applicant has approached the City to building additional parking areas on the property. These parking areas require variance from setback requirements. In addition, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing buildings also do not meet building setback requirements. This project requires variances from the following sections of City Code. 925 Winnetka Avenue North: · Section 11.35, Subd. 7(C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots abutting another Light Industrial zoning district, the north side yard setback shall be 20 feet. The requested variance is for 20 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 0 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing building. · Section 11.35, Subd. 7(A) Parking Lot Setback. City Code states that parking lots shall be setback 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed parking lot is for 33 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 2 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Lewis Road. 955-957 Winnetka Avenue North: · Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks. City Code states that buildings shall be setback at least 35 feet from any front yard property line. The requested variances are for 21 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 14 feet for the existing building at it closest point to the front yard property line along Winnetka . . . Avenue North; and for 15 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the existing building at it closest point to the front yard along 10th Avenue North. . Section 11.35, Subd. 7(C)(3} Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots abutting another Light Industrial zoning district, the north side yard setback shall be 20 feet. The requested variance is for 20 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 0 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing building. . Section 11.35, Subd. 7{A) Parking Lot Setback. City Code states that parking lots shall be setback 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed parking lot is for 34 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 1 foot at its closest point to the front property line along Lewis Road. Additional variance: . Section 11.70, Subd. 7 (F) Loading and Parking Requirements. The requested variance is to reduce the size of the parking spaces from the required 9 feet in width and 20 feet in depth to 9 feet in width and 18 feet in depth. Previous variances: These properties previously received variances. In November of 1967, a variance was approved for 955-957 Winnetka Avenue North to reduce the number of required parking spaces 44 spaces to 25 spaces. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. In December of 1970, a variance was approved for 925 Winnetka Avenue North to reduce required parking lot setback requirement along Lewis Road from 35 feet to 20 feet. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. Because of the current variance request and the changes to the parking areas, these variances would no longer be valid. Finally, in August of 1973, a variance was denied at 925 Winnetka Avenue North. The applicant had applied to allow the property to be used for an "automobile diagnostic and repair shop". The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. Review bv Inspections and Enaineerina: According to City Building Official Gary Johnson, the applicant has submitted a Code Analysis for the building at 955-957 Winnetka Avenue North. A 2-hour fire wall is required for buildings that abut one another. The Code Analysis states that the fire wall is in place between the two buildings. In speaking of this variance request with City Engineer, Jeff Oliver, he stated that the following conditions should be made a part of any variance approval: 2 . . . 1. Concrete curb and gutter be installed for the parking areas, as per City Code Section 11.70, Subd. 7 (C). A Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Permit would be required. If it is found that land disturbing activities result in more than ~ acre being disturbed, the water quality requirements of the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission would need to be met. 2. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in November of 1964 at 925 Winnetka and in 1967 for 955-957 Winnetka for the construction of these buildings. No other pertinent information was found in the file. 3 . Subject Property: 925, 955, 957 Wtka Ave Robert Venne, Applicant .~ I 5 ~ ~I I . aSlo Northern states Powe . . UOf) ,,; .:l 11460 ~n,~ ,JOO on - .... on .... ... .... AV[NU[ 0,1 846'-8341 N, . VALLEY 10 :.:., . .. 8.101 . ~" "t " 0' I I 'i~. :: I ~ I I I,.. ~ . I ~ IIJ!.JO I I I" I : ~ I I I I I 9 ~_ ~'o._, -< \~."" ,..,., \.lIlil . ..o_'~, (~, c.,t."'.\~~\\ tlt.l') ~ C!".:,o"I G.t.1> al . "(~\o/>~. . '\.. ..\., \0" " ~\..\..~~ 'l.~O " ~~E. SQu ~OO' . . '.10- .a~~ rh o . .' j ..""" . e .,. 0, 8 · ,450 ,,00 - . .' .. ... It~.N. .~ '<<~r '''''.0;'- li . '.1'" 0' I 2 jo~.. . ....~ ~" - (Revised 1/99) . . Petition Number 0;). - ., - 'J- ~ Date Received ~. S /7/4) Amount Received J 5'" 0 . CD ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS :;s 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: ?~.5 - /3--S- - <7.s'-? W/n1J1/ef /ef' 4t/e 11/0 2. BZA Petition Date /}fa yd.?, ;;J.. 00 J.- ( 3. Petitioner: Rt!l ;:, -e r f . tiE Ye /l/ /f./ ~ Name ? J I ~ Ifu!- L, S r /Vc-' ;-"';,'c/~y //tv Address . City/State/Zip 53""l./.J J... 'J:<;;J: :fr:' ') (PJ -.!>"'l.fl/ ~3 9' /b ;; d j> - ;> rYy - all 0 Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: IJs~;C'/al<?/ SerJ/,'c e~ - jJ~rfuer~1, /4 - /? 'r'? C7rkLq /Jr'. 55''1,,)) f) jJ e /V /1r IL.r ;r jJ r~~ IlfJb-e i" t E V..e..-vye.. 0 e;A/ fLerq" r!:z.t-I/f/'t'-I-' 11.1/ M /'cttf? ~/ /? r~~ / 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): See Il-T/t1lcJecY 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: _ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial 1>( rnr- "tp.r-cial . . (Jtlic:r !:'.:titl dirl-~ I AIlS. 8, Prof. OfriCp. / . / 7. h' e e / Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. J/ /l/ ~ f .?.s~ ( c; r..(!..eAJ .4r..e/( 0 A.J jew/Is 1fJ' 5' /~~ ::' f 8. {}rlfRriJ' ec; 7d-S-- ~S5-- 9s-i W;'/VtY.,2f"fa /Jve To d ~ r.ee/l/ /fy-.e/-c... ?--;".;6 L. p<ll/ ~vO tf- tU arK cj f 9 r f ~ r K r' 7' cg ;0 /1 C! -< s (Staff will complete this item) . 5/J/J e v Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons, necessity. or hardship which provide grolJnds f9r the granting of this waiver. Attach letter. photographs. or other evidence. if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land survey~r licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must sh9W all pr9P~rty lines. buildings. and streets. The distal)ce from ttle house a"ci ,1I9th~r buildings to the front and side prop~rty lines ~tlall b~ shown. Th4lt r~ardi~tance of any buildings from the property line W~II be n"ded, if in qu~stJon. Also. the survey should show an approxim;ate location 9f any b4i'c1ing~ 00 adjace"t properties relative to the side(s) where th, ~On~~r\l(:tJon wiJl ~l<e p'"ce. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant wiU supply seven ac:JditjoPill ~9pie~ of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. , . 1, J . . iJJ~{)~ Si9nature of Applicant ; t. ~ ': i .-., ( l ~, . ' . e!\ I I : ~ t~ . t' ;r',c" !\IFf{ FEClTC";. ~! , . :'" . : _ L ~ .:,. i. +, ; :t-, i ~ .. ','. j . . . ~ r~"_ The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a comer, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property . will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. ~J (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name 'Ph.'! K()~ - Comment -' I., , "II.. .~ ~U~4 V"I"'''IIII U ::t-..... 0 /~ Signature .f-t. ~..._ ~.4 Address f/) stj ~'.5 M. Print Name Comment Signature A<;tdress Print Name \ Comment . Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature ,A.0drp~s I ____'._'o -. _._, ---. ..- \ \ Board of Zoning Appeals November 141 1967 ' p;;sge 3 '-. ~ 11 -35 95 5 ~Ji ""atka Aven':!e North (21) S i dnei'Shap_~r,2.. The petition is for the waiver of Sec. 13.02 (D) or 20' to a front yard setbBck of 15 J off 10th Avenue North-from the rear or the pi"opos:':id build"irlg to 15' East of the Eastright-o'r--tlay of-f Le\rJis Road, and a t'nd vcr of ?Cf to a front yard setback of i 5: off Lel;.d s l1o,;;d frcm 15' so~th of the south right-of-way line of 10th Avenue North to the south property line for proposed parking Jot. Also a waiver of 13.01 of 6 parking spaces fora total bf~3B parkingspaces~ i.lOVr~D by Anderson, secOI'lded by Velz;I unanimotlsly cat-ried,tc approvl..:S the vJr:.dver of Section 13.01 on1.x. of 19 parking spr.;;ces fOI-s to~:,,'jl .of 25 park-jng spaces based en-foe 250 square foot requi l"emei1't, t~,dth the stipulation that al1'the required setback areas.be landscaped in 6<,?cor-dance \,rJi th the Zani ng Cade. . 715 Colorado Avenue So6ih113) B J Schwartz "..' '....- ,.'. "-..;.,.-.) is for the \,'Ja'iver of Section 5..06 ,of 1.~7; :to 8 f'"cnt- yard setbCl_' of 28' for bi tuminous parking and access in manel..lVer.." ai1ersfor loading andunioading of goods., Aftel- considerab',e ~ssiolj, the pet'itioner \-Jithdre\\I '_ s request~ and is gOl rag to IfJork ou!. ... 1 andscap~ og plan. ! t thnt Tilt: veaetatioil:shouid be or certain size to Q lde screening no\'\!,lI ana rnai ntai n i t~ sCi-eeni ng ef)" ~. throughou' . e seasona i change.. 67 - 11 - 37 The petition is for the waiver in \'1i tl1 of Sec. -------------------------- Chairman Christiansen 1', ~ , December 8, 1970 page 2 til the necessary signat'ur e was seconded by Mort Silverman and carr~e unan 925 Winnetka Averme North (map 21) Minnesota Woodworking Inc. The petition is for the waiver of Section 13.02 for 101 off the required sideyard landscaped area of 101 to a landscaped area of 0' along the North property line at the location of the existing building only. 5.05 B for 201 off the required sideyard setback of 201 to a sideyard setback of 0', from the North property line to the existing building only. 13.01 for the absence of 11 parking spaces from the required rnimber of 52 (1/400 SF) to the remainder of 41 parking spaces. 6.025 to allow one (1) loading dock on the Southwest side of the proposed addition. 13.02 D for 151 off the required front yard landscaped area of 351 to a landscaped area of 201 along the West property line on Lewis Road. Present to request the waivers were Mr. Robert Brenny and Mr. Melvin RockIer. " 'Mr. Brenny and the owner, Mr. Melvin RockIer, explained that the required ~ount of parking space is more than the present operation needs; and even hough there is space for the parking, they would rather landscape the area- especially the area along Bassetts Creek. The Board questioned theappealantand discussed all the requests. It was noted that the existing building was built before the present code in effect. : Board member Silverman moved to accept the waiver of Sections 13.02 and ?05 B as requested, ,on the North side of the existing structure only. Don Franzen seconded the motion and it carried unanimOUSly. The Board then discussed the request for a variance in off street parking. Mr. Brown mov,ed to make it the opinion of the Board that the site has (adeguate space available for the required rmmber of off street parking spaces, ,and therefore, a waiver is unnecessary. Seconded by Mr. Franzen and carried ,llnanimously. The Board then discussed the proposed loading dock and also the green area required along Lewis Road. , The Board and the appealant agreed that it may be possible to re-design the" dock and the green area to eliminate the need for a waiver. Joe Brown moved to defer a decision on the loading dock and the Lewis Road , landscaped area until the next meeting. It was seconded by LeRoy Anderson, ,': and it carried unanimously . . Board of Zoning Appeals January 12, 1971 " 178 LeRoy An est for the waivers. . It was wn and carried with 4 yea and 1 nay. 70-12-42 925 Winnetka Avenue North (map 21) Minnesota Woodworking Inc. The petition is for the waiver of Section 13.02 D for 15' off the required front yard landscaped area of 35"" to a landscaped area of 20' along the West property line on Lewis Road. Mr. Brenny presented the request for the waiver and showed the revised layout for the proposed addition. The Board discussed the space requirements for a truck turnaround subject propert,y. The Board was also aware of the existing waivers on neighboring proper to the North and West. LeRoy Anderson moved to accept the waiver as requested. It was by Franzen, and carried unanimously. (map 9) RobertW. Reitz (REVIEW) ition is for the waiver of Section 3. 2) for 8.2' off the required rear yard setback d" 9.4' to a rear yard setback distance of property line to the proposed 1970 Joe Brown moved the Board's feelings carried unanimously. ------ Dr. Chair:nan . -3- . Anderson roov~d to gr.mt the Halvor as req17.ested t.o allot.1 t bul1d:J.ng to uilt up 'to an elevation ot 867' assh<,mn in tho . sed plans. It Was se d by Mary Anderson, and carried unQni y. 73-8-21 (Map 21) In~. At the pet and carrie Septa era request, this item lias, on trotion, duly sccon ~ erred l1nti 1 tho next regular meeting of the Do ord in . . 13-8-28 (Map 21) / 925 Winnetka Ave: No. Ligl:rt Industrial, Minn. \-Jood'i.wrlcors Sii~f;Iy'.- The petition 6.02 1s for the t,laiver ot Section. to allow the aubject property to be uscd as an auto- mobile diagnostic and repair mlop as would not other~ wiso be allowed in .,he light industrial zono. Present to request the VCln.mco tfasHr. Robo.rt Branny and 111'. Ray t{uck:i la. They described their prposed uoaror the bUilding Qt 925 Winnetka Ava. No. . Also present 'WllS Mr. Fritz, the property.owner to tho South of the subject, and Mr. Raiersgord, attorney representing Nortronico. They were in genoral opposition to the proposal for an auto service garaeo in this 10ca.~ion. lfdlry Anderson stated that she c01xld nO"G see a clear hardship thnt wou1djustif'y <II variance of the cod., i.n tbis situiltion. J1ary J.\I1del~BOl1 moved to (kmy the uaivor au l'equoated, Qnd it WlllfJ s()condod by LeRoy Anderson, limd no c~rl"i()d ul1animously. 1114 Zane Ave. No. Idght InduDtriB 1, SchU1'lL!lche:r ~.Jbo l~~';'d 10 -..- ~. ,. . -- -., . XIe@:t,'s:' - . for the Ha:i. ver of Section , off tho r.equirod 20' rear yard setb dis'lame Bet/back of 10' from the propnrl:.y line to tho p d addition onl th'.) nr. S!.:humachor oxplained rcqu1;Hrl.;ed val'iance.' addi tioD ~nd the . 1121 a1l1d 1125 Welcomo Circle "teJl~O Pl":.'Wi''i; tbny gave Bome general objc~~tionG 'i..1} t.ll;' . . . . . . . . =d.gOMm~v1l~ Y 5-14-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 925, 955 and 957 Winnetka Avenue North Robert Venne. Applicant Robert Venne, with property located at 925, 955 and 957 Winnetka Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Light Industrial zoning district. The applicant is proposing to provide new paved parking lots at these properties. These new parking lots require variances from Zoning Code requirements. Also, as a result of this construction, it was discovered that the existing buildings do not meet current setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following sections of City Code. 925 Winnetka Avenue North: . Section 11.35, Subd. 7{C){3) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots abutting another Light Industrial zoning district, the north side yard setback shall be 20 feet. The requested variance is for 20 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 0 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing building. . Section 11.35, Subd. 7{A) Parking Lot Setback. City Code states that parking lots shall be setback 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed parking lot is for 33 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 2 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Lewis Road. 955-957 Winnetka Avenue North: . Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks. City Code states that buildings shall be setback at least 35 feet from any front yard property line. The requested variances are for 21 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 14 feet for the existing building at it closest point to the front yard property line along Winnetka Avenue North; and for 15 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the existing building at it closest point to the front yard along 10th Avenue North. . . Section 11.35, Subd. 7(C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots abutting another Light Industrial zoning district, the north side yard setback shall be 20 feet. The requested variance is for 20 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 0 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the existing building. . Section 11.35, Subd. 7(A) Parking Lot Setback. City Code states that parking lots shall be setback 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the proposed parking lot is for 33 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 1 foot at its closest point to the front property line along Lewis Road. Additional variance: . Section 11.70, Subd. 7 (F) Loading and Parking Requirements. The requested variance is to reduce the size of the parking spaces from the required 9 feet in width and 20 feet in depth to 9 feet in width and 18 feet in depth. . This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday, May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-3992. Adjacent properties require notification. .