07-23-02 BZA Agenda
.
.
.
Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, July 23, 2002
7PM
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chambers
I.
Approval of Minutes - June 25, 2002
II.
The Petitions are:
6620 Olympia Street (Map 15) (02-5-26)
Shaun Graham, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback
. .2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.8 feet for the existing
home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Olympia
Street.
. 30.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 4.9 feet for the existing
deck at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hampshire
Avenue North.
. 19 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 16 feet for the existing
home and the proposed 2-story room addition at its closest point to the
front yard property line along Hampshire Avenue North.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage and 2-story room addition
to the existing home, as well as to bring the existing home and
deck into conformance with building setback requirements.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (B) Rear Yard Setback
. 4.7 feet off the required 28.7 feet to a distance of 24 feet for the
proposed garage and 2-story room addition at its closest point to the
rear yard property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage and room addition to the
existing home.
235 Paisley Lane (Map 12) (02-7-35)
Jerry Kassanchuk, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback
. 10.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 24.6 feet for
the proposed garage and room addition at its closest point to
the front yard property line along Ski Hill Road.
.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage and room addition on the
property.
6500 North Cortlawn Circle (Map 18) (02-7-36)
Ralph Crews, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback
Purpose:
. .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line
along North Cortlawn Circle.
. 4.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 30.9 feet for the
proposed deck addition at its closest point to the front yard
property line along North Cortlawn Circle.
To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard
setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a front
deck addition to the existing home.
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings
.
. 5 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the
existing shed at its closest point to the home.
Purpose:
To bring the existing shed on the property into conformance with
Accessory Building setback requirements.
308 Turnpike Road (Map 9) (02-7-37)
Yuri and Vera Dreizin, Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks
. 7.75 feet off the required 11.25 feet to a distance of 3.5 feet for
the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the north
side yard property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing
home.
.
2
.
130 Edgewood Avenue North (Map 17) (02-7-38)
Marcia Anderson and Gary Berman, Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks
. .04 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.6 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the north side yard property
line.
. 3.9 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 11.1 feet for the
proposed garage addition at its closest point to the south side
yard property line.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback
requirements and to allow for the construction of a garage addition
to the existing home.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings
. 1.1 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 3.9 feet for the
existing gazebo at its closest point to the north side yard
property line.
.
Purpose: To bring the existing gazebo on the property into conformance with
Accessory Building setback requirements.
6420 Golden Valley Road (Map 16) (02-7-39)
Jeffrey Polinchock, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks
. 5.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 9.5 feet for the
existing home and for the proposed room addition at its closest
point to the east side yard property line.
Purpose:
To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback
requirements and to allow for the construction of a room addition to
the existing home.
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings
.
. The applicant is requesting to have the existing detached
garage to the west of the existing home and room addition,
rather than behind the existing home and proposed room
addition.
3
.
Purpose: To bring the existing detached garage on the property into
conformance with Accessory Building setback requirements (as a
result of the construction of the proposed room addition).
7155 Madison Avenue West (Map 14) (02-7-40)
Greg Stotko, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (A) Front Yard Setback
. 18.2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 16.8 feet for
the proposed parking lot at its closest point to the front yard
property line along Madison Avenue West.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed parking lot on the
property.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C) (3) Side Yard Setbacks
.
. 10 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 10 feet for the
proposed building at its closest point to the south side yard
property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed office and warehouse
building on the property.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 7 (A) and (8) Parking
Requirements
The applicant is requesting to reduce the number of required
parking spaces from the required 21 spaces to 16 spaces.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed parking lot on the
property.
7100 Madison Avenue West (Map 14) (02-7-41)
AI Peters, Applicant
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (A) Front Yard Setback
Purpose:
. .1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of34.9 feet for the
existing building at its closest point to the front yard property line
along Madison Avenue West.
To bring the existing building into conformance with front yard
setback requirements.
4
.
.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C) (3) Side Yard Setbacks
. 5 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 15 feet for the
existing building at its closest point to the east and west side
yard property lines.
. 15 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the
proposed dog kennel addition at its closest point to the east
side yard property line.
Purpose: To bring the existing building into conformance with side yard
setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a
proposed dog kennel addition on the property.
4810 Lowry Terrace (Map 3) (02-7-42)
Mary Condon Peters, Applicant
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks
.
. .6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.6 feet for the
existing home and for the proposed room addition at its closest
point to the west side yard property line.
Purpose:
To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback
requirements.
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings
. .6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.6 feet for the
existing detached garage at its closest point to the front yard
property line along Orchard Avenue North.
Purpose: To bring the existing detached garage on the property into
conformance with Accessory Building setback requirements.
5801 Olson Memorial Highway (Map 12) (02-7-43)
David Barton, Applicant
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (B) Rear Yard Setbacks
.
. 5.8 feet off the required 25.7 feet to a distance of 19.9 feet for
the existing home at its closest point to the rear side yard
property line.
5
.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with rear yard setback
requirements.
4915 Dona Lane (Map 4) (02~7~44)
Greg Wiley, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback
. 2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 33 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line
along Dona Lane.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard
setback requirements.
5735 Olson Memorial Highway (Map 12) (02~745)
Greg Balke, Applicant
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks
.
. 8.6 feet off the required 10.9 feet to a distance of 2.3 feet for
the existing home at its closest point to the west side yard
property line.
Purpose:
To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback
requirements.
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings
. 2.2 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 2.8 feet for the
existing shed at its closest point to the front yard property line
along Orchard Avenue North.
Purpose: To bring the existing shed on the property into conformance with
Accessory Building setback requirements.
6498 Westchester Circle (Map 17) (02~746)
Michael Pierson, Applicant
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback
.
. .7 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.3 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line
along Westchester Circle.
6
.
.
.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard
setback requirements.
2360 Lee Avenue North (Map 5) (02-7-47)
Mike and Mary Ellen Schrauth, Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback
. .2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.8 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line
along Lee Avenue North.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard
setback requirements.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks
. .6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.4 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the north side yard property
line.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback
requirements.
III. Other Business
IV. Adjournment
7
~
,
.
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25,2002
A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday,
June 25, 2002, in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley,
Minnesota. Chair McCracken-Hunt called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.
Those present were Chair McCracken-Hunt and members Cera, Sell, Smith and
Planning Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present wer iaison Dan
Olson and Recording Secretary Lisa Wittman.
I. Approval of Minutes - May 29, 2002
II. The Petitions are:
MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carri
May 29,2002 minutes as submitted.
8160 Wesley Drive (Map 20) (02
Steve Susich A Iicant
.
Req uest:
1.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks
required 15 feet to a distance of 13.6 feet for the
t its closest point to the west side yard property
Purpose:
existing home into conformance with side yard setback
ments.
Icants would like to build an addition onto their existing home.
e proposed addition would conform to setback requirements but
e is not in conformance with the side yard setback requirements.
MOVED b , seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the
request for 1.4 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.6 feet for the existing
home at its closest point to the west side yard property line.
1801 Independence Avenue North (Map 20) (02-6-30)
Sandra Gunderson, Applicant
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback
.
. 8.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 26.6 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line
along Independence Avenue North.
~
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2002
Page 2
"
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard
setback requirements.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks
.
MOVED by Smith, seconded by Sell and moti'
request for 8.4 feet off the required 35 f
home at its closest point to the front y
North and 2 feet off the required 6
closest point to the north side y
. 2 feet off the required 6 feet to a distance of 4 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the no 'de yard property
line.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into confor
requirements.
e yard setback
Olson stated that the applicant would like to add a deck
explained that the proposed deck conforms to setba~
existing home is not in conformance with the stgei:a fro
r ting home. He
ements but that the
rd setback requirements.
'C'-
'{,',;
unanimously to approve the
st e of 26.6 feet for the existing
"~;i>,,.Jine along Independence Avenue
istance of 4 feet for the existing home at its
'ne.
5121 Circle Down (
Alfred Minniti A
Request:
Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks
5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.95. feet for
existing home at its closest point to the east side yard
roperty line.
To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback
requirements.
Olson stated that the applicant would like to add a deck to his existing home. He stated
that the proposed deck would conform to setback requirements but that the e~isting
home is not in conformance with the side yard setback requirements.
MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Sell and motion carried unanimously to approve the
request for 1.05 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.95 feet for the existing
home at its closest point to the east side yard property line.
.
2
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2002
Page 3
.
4925 Bassett Creek Drive (Map 5) (02-6-32)
Karen Miller and Alice Ottavi, Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks
ad shown this request to Tom Hovey at the Department of Natural
is main comment was that the proposed new porch should align with
the two adja nt properties. He added that the Engineering Department agrees with
Mr. Hovey's comments.
· .03 feet off the required 15 feet to a distan
the existing home at its closest point to
property line.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into confo
requirements.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.65, S'D
.
. 16 feet off the require
existing home at its cI
Mark (top of cre
the required
porch at its
of creek
o a distance of 34 feet for the
t to the Ordinary High Water
Of! ssett Creek and for 10 feet off
'stance of 40 feet for the proposed
int to the Ordinary High Water Mark (top
sett Creek.
Purpose:
'ng home into conformance with the Shoreland
r ance setback requirements and to allow for the
of a porch addition on the property.
Olson stated that the
requirement is 5dW~r
want to repl
the curren
is request is along Bassett Creek where the setback
the top of the creek bank. He stated that the applicants
g deck, with a porch that would go closer to the creek than
Cera referred to the survey and asked which line denotes the ordinary high water mark.
Olson stated that the ordinary high water mark is shown as the "top of the bank"on the
survey.
.
Karen Miller, applicant, showed the Board photos of the property and construction plans
and discussed the construction of the proposed new porch. Sell asked if the porch
would be cantilevered. Miller stated no, because there are already footings under the
existing deck. Alice Ottavi, applicant, added that that is why they are requesting the
additional two feet for the new porch addition.
3
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2002
Page 4
Shaffer stated if the property were parallel to the creek he would vote against these
variance requests but this property is tilted away from the creek so he doesn't see this
addition as an issue. He stated that the house is really far from the creek, the proposed
porch is on columns, it won't change how the flood plain works and it would have
minimal impact on the neighborhood.
Sell stated he agreed that the request is minimal and tha
condition of approval, Mr. Hovey's request for a 10-foot
creek.
sed porch
Cera stated that the variance request is minimal and added that
would require less of a variance than the existing home waul
to include, as a
area along the
MOVED by Cera, seconded by Smith and mati nimously to approve the
request for .03 feet off the required 15 feet to of 14.97 feet for the existing
home at its closest point to the west side yar ine and 16 feet off the required
50 feet to a distance of 34 feet for the em t its closest point to the Ordinary
High Water Mark (top of creek bank) reek and for 10 feet off the required
50 feet to a distance of 40 feet for sed porch at its closest point to the
. Ordinary High Water Mark (top for Bassett Creek.
1400 Natchez Aven
Quinn and Daon
.i;:;{~ap 10) (02-6-33)
licants
Request:
Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback
.8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 18.2 feet for
existing home at its closest point to the front yard property
ne along Natchez Avenue South. .
To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard
setback requirements.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) Side Yard Setbacks
. .2 feet off the required 12.6 feet to a distance of 12.4 feet for the
proposed room addition at its closest point to the west side yard
property line.
.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a room addition to the existing
home.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(8) Rear Yard Setback
4
.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2002
Page 5
Purpose:
. 19.7 feet off the required 26.4 feet to a distance of 6.7 feet for
the existing greenhouse at its closest point to the rear yard
property line.
. 15.4 feet off the required 28.8 feet to a distance of 13.4 feet for
the proposed entryway at its closest point to the rear yard
property line.
. 4.9 feet off the required 30.6 feet to a di
the existing home at its closest point t
line.
5.7 feet for
rd property
Purpose: To bring the existing home into con
requirements and to allow for the c
addition to the existing home.
rear yard setback
of an entryway
Request: Waiver from Section 11
.
. 25.3 feet off the
existing shed
along Natc
to have
behind
et to a distance of9.7 feet for the
point to the front yard property line
ue South. The applicant is also requesting
fj;le north of the existing home, rather than
xis g shed on the property into conformance with
i1ding setback requirements.
Olson stated that,~os
He stated that the"
existing hom
on the lot,
property wa
was di ult t
corner 10
a taking by
riance requests listed above are for the existing home.
ts would like to build a room and entryway addition on the
hat this property is a corner lot so the home is pushed back
e part of an old farmstead. He explained that when the
,~ted the home ended up where it is on the property. He stated that it
termine the setbacks on this property because it is an odd shaped,
dded that another reason the property is situated as it is is because of
ot for 1-394.
Daon Karpan, applicant, showed the Board pictures of their house and a copy of their
construction plans. She stated that most of the remodeling would be creating more
living space for their family and that they intend to keep the original rock foundation and
barn feel of the house.
.
Quinn Karpan, applicant, stated that the current cantilevered deck would have a shed
roof for the weather conditions. He explained that to do additions to the home
anywhere else would change the flow of the house and wouldn't allow them to keep the
integrity of the house. He stated that they are requesting approximately two inches for
5
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2002
Page 6
.
one corner of the proposed room addition and that the neighbors would appreciate
them fixing the dilapidated green house.
Smith asked what the green house is going to be. Quinn Karpan stated that it would
become a four-season porch. He explained that the shed is not completely behind the
house because there is nowhere else to put it.
.
'i!~equired 28.8 feet to a distance of 13.4 feet for the proposed
closest point to the rear yard property line.
. 4.9 fee e required 30.6 feet to a distance of 25.7 feet for the existing home at
its closest point to the rear yard property line.
d. He stated
t about
proposed
way.
Sell stated that when he drove by the house he couldn't even s~.
that this property is unique and that there had been discussiops<j
tearing the house down. He stated he doesn't see any prolem~
additions and that if the shed were to be moved it would t Aiin t
Shaffer agreed that this is an unusual lot. He stated tha
like this at all. It doesn't fit any zoning criteria, so tne.
is.
as no precedents
to make it work with how it
Smith stated that he also thinks that the histo
important.
.
MOVED Sell, seconded by Shaffer
following requests:
ion carried unanimously to approve the
.
distance of 18.2 feet for the existing home at
perty line along Natchez Avenue South.
et to a distance of 12.4 feet for the proposed room
the west side yard property line.
d 26.4 feet to a distance of 6.7 feet for the existing
st point to the rear yard property line.
. 16.8 feet off the require
its closest point to the
. .2 feet off the requ'
addition at its dos
. 25.3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 9.7 feet for the existing shed at its
closest point to the front yard property line along Natchez Avenue South. The
applicant is also requesting to have the shed to the north of the existing home,
rather than behind the home.
.
115 Ardmore Drive (Map 8) (02-6-34)
Erich Wisiol. Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback
6
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2002
Page 7
.
. .6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.4 feet for the
existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line
along Ardmore Drive.
Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard
setback requirements.
McCracken-Hunt stated that it w
room addition look like a room
explained that the reason f
can't go down stairs to d
that this one seemed to b
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C
d Setbacks
. 11.2 feet off the required 15 feet t
proposed room addition at its cI
yard property line.
f 3.8 feet for the
the north side
Purpose: To allow for the constructi
home.
Olson stated that the applicant would Ii
home and garage, which would not m
m addition between the existing
yard setback requirements.
.
a w the applicant was going to make the
like a third garage stall. Erich Wisiol, applicant
osal is because his wife has severe arthritis and
stated that they looked at several variations and
ost reasonable.
out looking at the property the applicant mentioned
y easement on the north side of the property and that he
e addition back approximately one foot from that property
o f the easement area. McCracken-Hunt stated that moving the
,t'he property line would bring the addition to 10.8 feet in width
posed 12 feet.
Sell asked applicant if he was going to tear down the existing garage to build the
new garage stall. Wisiol stated that he wants to slide the existing garage to the north
and put the proposed laundry in between the house and garage.
Cera asked the applicant if he had thought about putting the laundry room in the
breezeway that is there now. Wisiol stated that the breezeway is too small and that it is
really more of a small mudroom then a breezeway.
.
McCracken-Hunt clarified that because of the five-foot utility easement the new
variance request would be for 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet at
its closest point to the north side yard property line.
7
~
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2002
Page 8
.
Shaffer stated that the lot is unique, the topography is difficult and the applicant couldn't
add on to the back of the house because the slope is too great. He stated that this
proposal wouldn't be doing too much harm because the adjacent house is so far away.
McCracken-Hunt asked if there was a vacant lot between the applicant's house and the
adjacent house. Wisiol stated yes there was a vacant lot between his house and the
house adjacent to him. He explained that the adjacent homeowne s two lots and
that the house is built right on the property line between the two.. ouse would
probably never be built on the lot between them unless he we e n his house.
Cera stated he was concerned because the Board usuall
if the applicant has a single car garage and wants to ma
that this request would be granting a variance for a dou
types variances
car garage, but
age.
.
McCracken-Hunt questioned if a future prope 0 turn the laundry room
addition into a third stall garage because the e wo work for a garage stall. Sell
stated he looks at room additions differentl th~~. gar~; e additions. Smith stated that
the applicant would really be ending up hatheihad in the first place with a double
garage. He stated he understands th f the Board but if Golden Valley
wants to keep people in this City t oing to have to look at and accommodate
some of these issues.
Shaffer stated that if there
line he would vote no on t
that he wouldn't approve
room addition is goin
look of the neighborh
next door that was 15 feet from the property
osa, ut the adjacent house is far away. He stated
Ird stall on a garage, but where this proposed laundry
I1se and that it won't change the characteristics or the
ded by Smith and motion carried unanimously to approve the
required 35 feet to a distance of 34.4 feet for the existing
oint to the front yard property line along Ardmore Drive and 10 feet
feet to a distance of 5 feet for the for the proposed room addition at
the north side yard property line.
III. Other Business
No other business was discussed
IV. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 PM.
.
8
"
":l.
..
.
6620 Olympia Street
02-5-26
.
ShaUD Graham
.
..
.
.
.
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
6620 Olympia Street (Map 15) (02-5-26)
Shaun Graham, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
This item was tabled at the May 29, 2002 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. Attached is the
original request given to BZA members at that time.
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
6620 Olympia Street (Map 15) (02-5-26)
Shaun Graham, Applicant
Date:
May 22,2002
Shaun Graham, with property located at 6620 Olympia Street, is requesting a variance from
the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build
a 2-story room and garage addition onto the existing home. In addition, a survey was
submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home also does not meet
building setback requirements. This project requires variances from the following sections of
City Code.
. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback.
City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property
line. The variance request is for .2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.8 feet at
its closest point to the front yard property line along Olympia Street for the existing home;
for 30.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 4.9 feet at it closest point to the front
yard property line along Hampshire Avenue North for the existing deck; and for 19 feet off
the required 35 feet to a distance of 16 feet at it closest point to the front yard property line
along Hampshire Avenue North for the existing home and for the proposed 2-story room
and garage addition.
. The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(8) Rear Yard Setback.
City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has
determined that the rear setback to be 28.7 feet from the property line to a structure. The
requested variance is for 4.7 feet off the required 28.7 feet to a distance of 24 feet at its
closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed 2-story room and garage
addition.
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in March of 1946 for the
construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
Subject Property: 6620 Olympia Street
Shaun Graham, Applicant
.
~, ~ ~"~"& ...: . "'ll :::::----:::- $ .
~~~, .~~\ s--- '__.. -. "
~.\o. :.; \... II ~ 0 ~ ISO. _____ _~.
I~ "'~ ...~ ~.' 11<, .;:,
." '<e '(' . tAl :: B . . .
~':?~.l \ ~'"..~. ~. ~r-~.'
.:l: __ __IZ \~ ."1Ur .7,.'~'
'J ; ~ !" A-~ 0 L- J r-';,-~ -.." . s 1-5 /"0"
. ,84.. ,. .., .~r.s iZ~ . 6'~:...1t. . .5 :"-. I .
I . .... ~ ... I" ~ iI'~,. '" .: ','/)wl'i. '" ...'1--.. · . '. 1'"
"7.. -:.~ _" ' ~J{f . . .8;'1 ~ . II
I '" ro. -,. .--i -. S : .... ....\'1i.t,.... 'Ii~"~.., '. "'-\I.. - )i~
' I.: I'" .... -- ..,... --.. I ~
D;1 q.. -= ti .. 1Ii~ ~ ...~~# ','0 \ ....... "'" ~ '. ''"' ,:0
, \. ';', '0 '5! ~ \; 4. '. ..~J: '. .~~ "... l- ... ........1"
'- ~ I!' '~~. 8" . ,.' ~ 2V~~-..S .. 6'~/s., ",'" ';..,~: i
!~.Z '.;" . .~\~- %4'04-_ :5 .iS~ ~ 10'.1 . ~ <104 6'''0 ~ ./~::::)1~)
'I" '" t!!!" ~ ~ \1;~ !.. r\:. ~.!lb.~ ~;,- .016'", ~t:'':'' ~;. ~
.~. ~""~'{o" I ~'. , IST~:::'--; .~!:!":-' ., A o:t" ~~. .1' ~
! ~ .1.", ~ ;;: i\-.J~ Z4'.04 2 "~.L~ ~~ . 151.. ...l', ~ ~ . ... . ,.' 0' ':;
~~..~. i . .:.'/:l!! _____ . .-w... z ./' . I ~ t... . ~
2:"n".I...:'"0 '~.-~ ~!. 10 1.... I ~5~~~1 ; ~ .1" .l;i
3 ''1'". ~ i '".... %4'.04 . ~ - ~ .\'ZU ,,, 1R III %'4.~ ,.;
. '.~T'i ': -15D~ ~ ~' ].'",;~' l'~ . 150~ ~ ,.. "l;!i' '~'. -~;':.:~:' "..~50.
:1 Z{;!, Zr~ zJ Z!_: z~ Zr' 1,- lB. 11; " :.~ 14~ I~~ ~Jl~ ":: ~:'; S;! 1.. ,~ S ~4~1 3... t;~I: ....
~~""'J~:~. .i:~ II.:' ~ ~~ .~~ .$:: - -i.t.~. ,.~ .~} "." :t~}. 's; ~
= 6T~067":" 6700 6& ;'6/0 ~"'t'l:;?g ,.:::8 ~ ,.,:'''.6411 6410 tU0$6~32;"~~ S:JOS .It::
~. ..... _~'," :," ,.~~..; ~~p.!! -II.~~ "=.......J!'..I. So.... '~t..'I'i ":;I . ," ~ . I "l! '0 I"I~'I'. '"' S.
.:! - .ff! - ... ~..~ :;, H' .;:l "IaJ I"" jj I i:;i ,wi ~
It. 1/'" 1~ 'r: 14.,:15 C( ~ , .Jl1j, 1'v ,; II..! i9 I~: ,l~ J?l,t: sf 88 :,( '0 l"~ 'Zl ,j:,4 's'i'~
~~ " ~~.:.~! l 'It ~~. , !~: ,1''15. <(llR..tIi:~. .~.; "~:e. ~. n~.~ ..: sj
J :: S I ,.~ ~I ~I ~: : ~II.; ~ ~,: ~ :J~ ~ ='
t~ IU It llltf II': 110 ~ I'J!I IlrJ 114 IIfl ilt : I Ii: 110 : 111'1 ~ iI0,i",,01 10': 1 S: 104 I~~ I]or: lo! 106'1" ~'1.
~. ~I ;:1. T .~. u:i: ::;. - +; 1I;;:e ~ ,t It\! +;:;.
..~.. ..~.. ..~ISo J$ls.~" 16".~f2SII'.;!~ ~ t.o.uSo::! :r. it, i:i s. ~='1.2siS.~" ..~... 50::::
I S7~O .. """'" 6'sqa~8 6S0D 642,,4 6408 6400 6326 (;~/6 63()O ~ ~ ~
..... 6- 71 6"2;:> ""..,.,. ""'I' "4H 6<<>' ""'", ".,. ,,",01' ~~ : I!
'~r'~ "0 "~ '0' 5'0 l'~l~ ~"I2S1 So;.' 'J" : 5<L "'!.p."l:I" '.~' 60... N;E::J ... i":!:I S.
.., ~ j ..iF ~. '" 1:1 'iI..l H ! ~ ~ ... !Or ;.>, I I ~
~.'t:"l "8 :1" 110~1~~ ~~~ \l4'1::'~S !11~ 111 118 \1,:.J ~ ~~ill'JI8Z 1.8f!.1~'~4 18511.\ 18f:/lJ". l-ioh'!:i~~
',. l!.. . liNI"'s l~..~. :.I. - Ii. .;' .;JI..l!;!l .~_:~.
~ ..I.. l~"" '0 I~,~s. :ii.. "::'50 i.i_II;,! .. I.. .~J..~ s. '....~ .~. s.,=,U s~S~ .
1(;;." Z~18~ ~1!1~~ ZI01~~" ~~tj~JZls 11~;,i.1Za~ ZoS!tar 10' J~ ~ 4 Zo~ ZO~ lol zoi I~ I'~ 1'~1~ ,,~. I'~ I,i!m ..
);. .~ :t ;:.~... ... · s ';:Jl , ;!I.. 5 . ~ ..c . .~. . e:. . e.~. I ,
"s. ......;; .-i;l;.- 5. I..:'\'.li.. -~. "!!'o ~;~..-...~:':!.. S,;
$ U.J() 67/, LIJ 681t+.., ',JZ 6520 6608 S4S2 ~ 64/8 64QJ.6400S328 6320'63166.$12 6$00.
d , Z"'-:S-fl'.SD "
.~'F'/'8Z. 70
t. ."...,-: 7Z .
(
I
I,
.
... Z(;/5.Z5Res. ..,
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
Petition Number 0).. - )"' - ::l. (."
Date Received
5/8 I 0-;).
Amount Received 5- 0 . OD
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1.
Street address of property involved in this petition:
i~ &)j) Ot-'f Ih PIA
2.
5;T
qj..{,
BZA Petition Date /I1A't:.LI-I U'"
Petitioner: Sf/l4 V~ r:;, tl4#I4,"1
Name I
. . (R ~ W uL---Y;11I'IA
Address
, Il-lJ1-SS"K'3
Business Phone
3.
S7. b~;'L>p../ 1//4-4u1
. City/StatelZip -
'7 &'3 - 5" LS- - 7 1(77
Home Phone
S-sY27
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
_L01 ~O'~;;A l UUvto;Ji
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
/ .
Residential: ..,/ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial
Commercial
Institutional
Other
Bus. & Prof. Office
7. Detailed description of ~~ilding (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site. plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardsbip which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10.
A current or usable survey of the property must be attached~ Proposed
surveys are not accepJable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings, and streets. . The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed.
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount o~,~ representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. 'r, I .
I /--" \ ;'
/ I,.., '- X I
, \J\aJG~il,~_
,~ .,
~Ignature ojApplicant
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
.
.
.
.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly acro~;s the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of .
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project.)
Print Name-;;:1:7 ~ LC2 ..} J t3 e (2..
Comment We H-A- iJ e- Nd f9 (~ .J -I:-c /7 "..~ h
rJh · I . P 12-0 J e-c,. ~ 7 00 (f)/.;y J1.t r I fl- i-t
Signature ..LLq~~ Address
Print Name d;'1 . AUL if
() ~~ ~-I-u.-n ~ -I-v j1,1~
Comment (PoL I-JIt.VL A) ()
-+ ,-
Signature ( f!r~t.~ Address j~O/ /) /I;.I-jlJlh ~ ~. M.
I
Print NameJo IJ n VI 70bak
Comment
SignatureQo ann .y'~Jl Address !5-~S f44Yff~ ~" V
Print Name /n I Lhttv{ L H Gl ~:rs "
c..~ OK.//
Comment"",N 0 (y.RJFJ-7'~ To IHLS:. pRCi:Ja~T -
Signaturefi.~~~~ ;r ~ Address0021 ril;/J1f/1 S+
Print Name-Ni8t_ A. ~~~\O~
...---. I", _ r ' t,
Comment .-L r-ll~ Y1c~ DIOJ.R(jJi1 tJ .-'"\.
J.o JJl1 ~ <-P.ey.fL,.
Signalure--/{a:o..l.~",-=
Print Name '/?:;~, __)./,4 11 c 11,{" Ie lei
Comment }J 0 (91) 'i e c;., TI (1 n -
v .
Address fdc1t;1 OW" c.. 9-:
Signatur~/jwif~AtP If u';fcL,
Address 6<t,/o O~L6- C/~,.
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Print Na~ '
Comment
" r.... III . ~.... .. .....' I' -
.
''"'J
'"
, . .
..:........\.. \-l,r'::" .)'.....'wo ,>.r-.~ .,tt:.~.: .
, -
. ,=,'110
-...~ -\
Signature
Address
Print Name
Comment:
Signature
Address
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
.
Lor 5
BBS.B
--
/
N 89042'55" E
79.10
886.0 x
I
I
f
,
fence
~ BBB.O ;t
~ I
L...:.enc:e --'X-'
~ '~
~
)( 888.L '\)l X B90.4
~ 22.0 iqr
I:>
::0 <0
ttj ~ GARAGE O~
~ 7.7 '<-
11.5 0
~ :<; <.9 c: (,~ "
8..... ~
"''V~ 0,
< cl""'
ot.;j ): 891.9
~ c::)~ 29.8 '8.OS
~..... 1 ST-F HOUSE
"'l
~ 89f.Z )( L .5
::::
Wood "-
Dec. 0;
;,
~ 15.0 ~~
891.1 x II: 891.9,7:96
.
i... _. Egress Window W~I/
(with stf!PS)
..
.;
..,
N
I
N 89042'19" E
78.90
I
J
I
It" 892.8 I
x 891.6
OLYMPIA STREET
0- Denotes_ ;rprt monument
X 000.0 Denotes existing elev.
DEMARS-GABRIEL
ND SURVEYORS, .INC.
3030 Harbor Lone No.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Phone:(76J) 559-0908
Fox :(763) 559-0479
--.....,
887.9 x ,
,
\
\
:<;
.....0
""'~
~~
t.;jol;..'
<:::l~
"'l
Lor 19
x 891.1
'j..:1}acenr
IOlJ$6
x 892.3
-_..../ )( 892.9
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 20 and 21, BELMONT, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this survey. plan or report was prepared by {TIe
or under my direct supervision and that I 'om 0 duly Registered Land
Surveyor under the Lows of the State of Minnesota.
lO.%. 0
David E. Crook
File No.
1 1472 B
Book-Page
401-43
Dote: 9l24/ 0 1
Minn. Reg. No.~
Scale
1"=20'
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR
SHAUN GRAHAM
s~ ~ -/o?-
.
'-~To -THE. \SoA~O O~ "ZONltJG AP~GS
I N R~6 AeOS 'TO fob w OL-'-(vY\ ~ I f-\ ~ T )
Lois 2IJ"t L..l ~ELVV1CN1 ADOtT,cN,
tus to tHE ~(Y\tv\ee. -Wol ~ -l'AVj~&,
V~o,)~-r .~) Tl-'i8 ~T~~7 ElEVA/loN VJAS
~..)E\2:.eD ~ '1 13 11'")(.,, HE:S.. l ~ r€E7 0 r::- A
~1~001 be\\J€vJAl'l-\-AD 10 f>€. RBD.8A(e,1)
fO\Z AN A(_,LEP7A~LE G:tr2.AD€ FR.OM STl2t:--a
.
A ~E-rAIN IrJb WALl..- \ WII~-\ ~ref?S 'FROM
J1-.\e.- Oe\\J\?:y.JA'"1 '"1'0 THe: ~\Ot l):)ofL O~ "lH~
Hous~ )l-\AO """"fa AL-SD ~S ~McveO.. 'B€(AV~E"""
~n-\~ ~/AltJlrJft WAll- \VA~ Noi LOW ENOU~ 14
-rOA~OMA\"JA-r~ '11-48 f0E,lt0 eL-e:vATION.. Or:
(H~ CorJG\Ge16 ~Ag .
H\~~'{) IH'G VA!'l<-aN ~ON(Ae.t:/E c.ofY\IjJAN~
-ro \2.:5MoVE: THe: i2-e/AlrJ}N~ WAL,,- i 8l\S-ftu
t>~\\JEWA'1' I 1'0 1146' GA~f::. A(,\.H:~IVjN fz A
Ut--.H to\2M ~pe- ~or(.. IH~ Di<\ueI,-.)A'-1 J fN'O A
La \rJ8e.. 8LE VA -r I orJ rove. A tJE.~ \<;~,-r AJN} !\J(1 WALL-
, ?-\:S flAL€Y) TH~ ~IAJNlf,-J(:L WAU- J ArJO
'\?,ull7T A DG,-~ O\J8t- -rr\~ WAGL WiTHOUt A
'P~R-y)\Y1- i\JO, ~ow 1\ {?EYZVY\lt WA~ et:lV.Jllf.tl) J
\ AM '\-JaW ~Vt~-r/llj~ 'A VAR-\P.rJtJC fot<.- -n-te Dt:L\C.
~
\ D\DN-r WAN1 TO "F/NANLE
.
R \SS~~(,,-r F LJ L \/1
SAAV~ Ge-AJ-)f\M
,.
,.-- .
':::> - ~ -- OL
.
-\0 II
-r "t"E
\?:i)Aeo o~ L.DtJlrJ~ tA~~
I t-JO\N HAVe A 900 ~&UA~ ~aT1
HO\J~E:' \r-J\7H A t..-o I \Jll[)~ 'f ""2""2) ~
GAlAfct~1 rAelC.- L- \J€I-tIGLES iN 71--le:
I
\)e\\j~ ANO OI\J~ lrJ IH~ <":;T~ 8El.AuS~
-rl-lr; IS ~o ~OM ~o..;L A CAe IN 7He:
CitA u~e '
\ \\,} Ovt...O u~E 'To ~~VV\uVE T+-t€' f7it\\UL\6("",
Yl\l.OVV\. ""T H€ \-\O\.6~ ArJ'D ~U~GO A ~b
I
w IO~ -., 7..fb DE:6(? ;\/IALHE:V-) 6AeAfJ€ )'wrrw
Gfo 'f '1-'1, t)VitJ~ Sf'Al..€ A&>J5. FotL A VV\t\S7C\L
\?;Eo iZ-oOY\'\ sur16 l ~AVV\\\";'1 \ZOOM
.
I HA\Je Loo~ro 10 \2€ fLA~ M'"T ~SIS-rJr0~
)-\oY'n~ ~\Jl JA.f-7~ \r:)\SClhSIDrS~ trJl-rH ~LJ:t'TAn-
f-\b~.v-JlS. ) A-rJ AOOrTIO~ l;-JD\.Ji-D "BE AN )~U~-rM&17
""To A HOMe- 1 AlZo:\ ~€DbveAV'I-\ILAU...,-1 jAf''PCALJrJl7
1"0 Vv\'1 WD~K- \ C..-t--\\\..;\YS f>ee;E:iJ7 'Sc:_,t.-\OOU~"
SiILJAII()td .
) '\IJOVL,1l) l,,\~e tu S/rM 'rJ IH~ ACg-A.
~'V1\rJe A~ 'SIM'PLr1 OVl G,~Ir-5&t OUvL
~<;~..-..A S(QUA~ rou-rA~t
?E. ~ f'EZ-1 ~ u LL-'-(
<:;t-!-AUN G~\-\AM
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~W'd'~Um_vlt~ Y
5-14-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
6620 Olympia Street
Shaun Graham, Applicant
Shaun Graham, with property located at 6620 Olympia Street, has
petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from
the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a
2-story room and garage addition to the existing home. This addition
requires variances from building setback requirements. In addition, a
survey was submitted for this proposal and it was discovered that the
existing home does not meet building setback requirements. This
construction project requires variances from the following sections of City
Code.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code
states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front
yard property line. The variance request is for .2 feet off the
required 35 feet to a distance of 34.8 feet at its closest point to
the front yard property line along Olympia Street for the existing
home; for 30.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 4.9
feet at it closest point to the front yard property line along
Hampshire Avenue North for the existing deck; and for 19 feet off
the required 35 feet to a distance of 16 feet at it closest point to
the front yard property line along Hampshire Avenue North for the
existing home and for the proposed 2-story room and garage
addition.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states
the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth.
Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 28.7 feet from
the property line to a structure. The requested variance is for 4.7
feet off the required 28.7 feet to a distance of 24 feet at its closest
point to the rear yard property line for the proposed 2-story room
and garage addition.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Wednesday,
May 29, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800
Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any
questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the
Planning Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
..
..
.
235 Paisley Lane
02-7-35
.
Jerry Kassanchuk
.
...
.
.
.
Memorandum
Planning
763.593.8095/763.593.8109 (fax)
Hey
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
235 Paisley Lane (Map 12) (02-7-35)
Jerry Kassanchuk, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
Jerry Kassanchuk, with property located at 235 Paisley Lane, is requesting a variance from
the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build
a garage and room addition to the east side of the existing home. This addition requires a
variance from building setback requirements. Below is the requested variance request:
. The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City
Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line.
The variance requested is for 10.4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 24.6 feet at
its closest point to the front property line along Ski Hill Road for the proposed room and
garage addition.
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in July of 1950 for the
construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
Subject Property: 235 Paisley Lane
Jerry Kassanchuk, Applicant
I:
\ ! /US:5
'2.00 110 'Z.lt 'Z.I(
3 f'
2 u;
..s>
~
,s
.
",
......~.......
g I'.
5>
6/00
GLENWOOD
o~o
o '" 0
400
.8
1&
\
\- ....
\,1",
~
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
0)-7--3 '5'
fo /'1/ OJ-
Petition Number
Date Received
Amount Received Sf). DO
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
:l3 5' fa \, '5 1 eJ ~v\'e
2. BZA Petition Date :J u.. ('1 {J.~ / I' 0 ~
3. Petitioner: J e...n- 'j r< Cl-S So V\.c.-k 1A-K'
Na'?L '-t 5 ? d l s Ie '1 L.c-Y\e be~" V.L U"( , AW "'><1 2..2.
A ress .-:1 .. I City/State/Zip
-r (.,."3 5t.t #..2.(,"l 54.
iness Phone orne Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
Lo-f- 5) Glock ::l-} TeA-L~E"
l-\ ~e.r ~'"' Cou..","- \" I )J....)J
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: ~ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office
. Other
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
A-t:~{'~e -lev'cd ad d ~ t-lO"'-\. &"11\. -to eke- ~ot-t,^-~;a.s-t 12..\.'\.d eif' ~e.
~ ~ 5 \-\..'", " ""- t'>u.. S ~ , ~ l " VJ e.. So. t- (e.ve t (" "V\...-e <:;'(- li ., +\'" c: e t' le~l)
L....>cv.....lJ. "G>e.. dV-~ e.- sP.lCe ...\'9 leve SchM.e. ~ eIX;si\.~
ho l.L-5 e. ') t.v c v.... t J io e c.... '^""- ~ 'S -\-.... It-- . 10 e... d ~ --.... .
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposeft
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the hOLJsQ
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed.
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adiacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ :5"0 representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
t\~.~~
of Applicant
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
. GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project)
Print Name E.u ~ 67JG V- jJAJ /.5 eMGf~ewr; eft. /
Comment No IJ E'
Signature ()lfl~, Address 29 (iln5tc( ~rd
.
PrintName Slevl ~ fJ()..f J gh.~o~
tJ,- f~t!-( ;f W Ii! aj~ -h ~
or ~.~~ .
Signature ~ . __
Print Name U) i'a hJL r{. / c ~qr d
Comm~nt Goo/. (lect ~
Comment
t/, (4 -c
Address .22-' h '~ky La. '1.('
Signature ~ UA'c1 ~ 1)
Address. ;U 1- Pais ~ ~
Print Name-IJ-l LL 00 L.{IA/\
~
Comment t W A,.J.J T \~ 01:> .~ ><:2 &1f\!\, Gr .4-. I to/....-. ~
rlX~
Signature _.1<- ., - '.' - . -
Address
2 1/ f A%F}1 uJ
.
.
.
.
June 3, 2002
Statement of reas.ons for requesting waiver of that part of the zoning code relating to
setbacks:
The proposed addition to an existing 1700 square-foot slalron,..grade house would
provide adequate living space for a family of four. The added living space totals just
under 1200 square-feet. There is also garage space large enough for two cars, mower,
snowblower, etc.
The architect for the project recommends a "tower" type of addition at the end of the
house for a number of reasons. Mostly importantly. this end is heavily wooded thereby
causing the addition to be very inconspicuous.
Also, the steep slope of the lot at this end of the house, which makes the space virtually
useless for anything else, allows for a relatively large amount of living and garage space
on a very small amount of land space (approx. 800 sq. ft.).
Finally, locating the addition here allows for access to additional garage space without
the encumbrance of a driveway on a steep hill.
The only slight drawback to putting the addition here is that it requires reducing the
setback on the northeast side of the lot (the old Ski Hill Road side) from 35 feet to 22 feet
and on the northwest side (the property line between 245 and 235) from 35 feet to 27 feet
(after a proposed subdivision which would addtwenty feet of property to the 235
address).
For the reasons cited above I request a waiver of the setback requirements. I also offer
this for your consideration: The addition is on property next to a deadend street. This
street serves only two other houses. The addition would be nearly completely hidden
from occupants of both houses. And since there is no thru traffic on this street, the
addition could not be considered an eyesore even if weren't already hidden by trees,
bushes and shrubs.
Respec~UllZ::
~~.L-k
I
\
"
"
/'~
G
6
/
/
\
"'.
'~
"
, ,
"
'~
lC
S
/ ~
/91' 00
U\. ~ \
. . C~
. \, "
:0":,,
",
"-,, -"--
"-
",
<0
.....
\
\
"
'"
"-.
,
.
'"
it)
"
......-----~
'l>
'J
C>
'(j). --- ................., ::lit
"'- --
'"
i....
'"
"
/ U'
; ~~O
I U'v'
./ .,~,.-
; + ~ ~
~ ..1>.. . ~ .;;?
,~ '..1- ~..
'/0 ~
~,
co
_.P--
<0
'"
"
""
~
'\
'-
, "'-
't
t-c
tI
~
'C
.
/~
~c;,
t
. I;
~
\~--
\
/
/
.
/
~
t"'"'~
II II
l\)t;
~.
. C"\
~
.
.
i
.
.
www.d.goUm_vll~ Y
7 -9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
235 Paisley lane
Jerry Kassanchuk. Applicant
Jerry Kassanchuk, with property located at 235 Paisley Lane, has
petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance
from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a
garage and room addition onto the existing home. These proposed
additions do not meet building setback requirements. Below is the
requested variance:
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code
states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front
yard property line. The variance requested is for 10.4 feet off the
required 35 feet to a distance of 24.6 feet at its closest point to
the front property line along Ski Hill Road for the proposed room
and garage addition.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
'-
~
..
.
6500N orth Cortlawn Circle
02-7 -36
.
Ralph Crews
.
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
6500 North Cortlawn Circle (Map 18) (02-7-36)
Ralph Crews, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
Ralph Crews, with property located at 6500 North Corti awn Circle, is requesting variances
from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to
replace a deck addition to the front of the existing home. This addition requires a variance
from building setback requirements. Also, a survey was submitted for this construction
project and it was discovered that the existing home and shed do not meet building setback
requirements. Below are the requested variances:
. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback.
City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property
line. The variances requested are for .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7
feet at its closest point to the front property line along North Cortlawn Circle for the
existing home and for 4.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 30.9 feet at its
closest point to the front property line along North Cortlawn Circle for the proposed deck
addition.
. The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory
Buildings. City Code states that a shed shall be at least 10 feet any structure. The
property owner is requesting a variance for the shed to be exist at a distance of 5 feet
from the existing home rather than the required 10 feet.
A permit for the deck being replaced was pulled in July of 1977. It is unclear why a variance
was not required at that time. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled
in May of 1959 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in
the file.
.
Subject Property: 6500 North Cortlawn Cir
Ralph Crews, Applicant
.
1.I08.3Z
N87..F$'zD "F
- - - - - - - - - -----; ""ft~.-N0:3i6124777;;DC.~ I~
-~
~
<>
~
. '" ~
1e::( tv
J2
--=~~~l'
... ~fe ; !*
~ .... .:t
PART 0 ~~
~ ___.____ __ \6.
~
.
~ .
.
(Revised 1/99)
.
Date Received
0,') " 7 - 3io
101.2 '3 / o~
Petition Number
Amount Received S- 0, OD
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN'V ALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
6 b-tJCJ Af L~;- f /at.//i C /rc L9
.
2. BZA Petition Date
3. Petitioner: RI//';-/ CrB?J S
Name
6S2'o ~ CorfJqwn C';rcle GJ~ en V;/llJ 411V.sJ;.Jf.J.
Address City/State/Z'
763- S-44 -63?z.....-
Business Phone Home Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
Lo+ 2 /3/c)c-l(..5 Ccrf !q?<.Jn IJJd. 'f2 hd s&c--f"o'r/
.
!lehn e'lnh CO?!'? 7',' /l7H
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: ~_ Double DWelling _ Muttiple Dwelling
Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office
. Other
.
.
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate. .see ..i1/ach m-8hf:
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed.
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ S-O. DO representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
~~/~
Signatur of Applicant
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
t
.
.
.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project)
Print Name
Comment
I ~~SJ.. C~\\~
Go fOr- ,t \
Signature
%9H~~~
~6qYl TA G1'ytJ(),S oY\
I '-'
/l/e..W P (j rc.h. IN; /1
, .
Address .JlD.I I (J r l~r{n (t-<"~ Lk'Jk-
Print Name
Comment
/oo/==.
~
hJc-e..
Signature
Print Name
Comment
~~~
.~
])A: V .t.-..t::). I y;iJ m
/ f/
6S /6 J' Co rlktvlt C/,r
Address
Signature oiJ~;...P -~ Address 6416 II}" &;.o-L-AivA/ C(~
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
~
.
.
9 ~~r ~ ..:-
~ ~;6"~?<J~
~ ~~ ~;d.r
~~~~Jo;iR? ~.-n.
~~~~~
,:t:dA-i b~. ~
~~~~Tk&
7~1~~~
~~~~1~
...,.., :#i.- ~ 2a ~ $
~ Y
. o. _ . ~ ·
.
I
I
~ I
".
( I
~S?j
~O"I.'!-
,OJ
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
"-
'"
""- FLORIDA COURT /
'-.. /
/
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
LOT 2. BLOCK 3.
COURTLAWN ADDITION 2ND SECTION
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN
3
~ ..--
-r
I
N90"OO'OO"E 287.11<>'lo~ meal:!
,...--
2
11lLE INFORMA l10N PROI/lDED BY ClJENT, AGENT
OR COUNTY TAl< INFORMA 110N
NO 11lLE RESEARCH CONDUCTED. UNLESS NOTfJ)
'\
<:p'
"
pp
153.1
134.9
..
~
Cl
(Q
LOT AREA: 19,710:l: S.F.
IMPERIOUS AREA: 3,150:l: S.F.
COVERAGE: 16%
3
""-
""-
""-
"'-
""-
""-
""-
"'-
BEARING SYS~ ASSUMED
SCALE IN F-e:ET
, , . I ...._~ I
N
~
CO&,
~1
-1 ~I\I
0~
~<t
~
RALPH & BETTY CREWS
6500 COURTLAWN CIRCLE N.
GOLDEN VALLEY. MN 55426
763-544-6382 922
o
20
40 "'-
""-
""-
""-
"'-
""-
""-
""-
"'- @ 2002 SURVEY & MAPPING SPECIALISTS
""- REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED
" (Q Cl
"
<>
~.
60
lliElW.
X SPIKE (NAil) SET
. IRON MONUMENT FOUND
o IRON PIPE SET
A NAIL & BRASS DISK SET
X25.0 SPOT ELEVATION
ASSUMED DAruM (EXCEPT WHERE NOTED)
AND STANDARD OF WORK FOR SURVEYOR BASED UPON
"NORMAL" STANDARD OF CARE REQUIRED BY LAW
""- 7.10
-.....;,'{~ "
~"O..
""-
"-
& SURVEY
If'. SPJ!CIALlSTS
J:iQIE;. THIS SURVEY IS FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF
THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, AND/OR PARTIES NAMED THEREON.
. IN<<)-- SJR\IE'l1NG . LAND DESCRIP110JtS
. CONSlRUC11C>>f STAKlNO . $UBDlWAOH PI.A 15
::-: MH = :--::;: ~~ t=> ~er-o'71
1M WEIRO (7f3) 241-0171 SAUK ~ t.M 5I37t
.~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
www.ci.gOMro.vl1~y
7 -9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
6500 North Corti awn Circle
Ralph Crews, Applicant
Ralph Crews, with property located at 6500 North Corti awn Circle, has
petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from
the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a deck
addition onto the front of the existing home. This proposed addition
does not meet building setback requirements. Also, during the
construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property
and it was discovered that the existing home and shed do not meet
building setback requirements. Below are the requested variances:
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code
states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front
yard property line. The variances requested are for .3 feet off the
required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet at its closest point to
the front property line along North Cortlawn Circle for the existing
home and for 4..1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 30.9
feet at its closest point. to the front property line along North
Cortlawn Circle for the proposed deck addition.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code
states that a shed shall be at least 10 feet any structure. The
property owner is requesting a variance for the shed to be exist at
a distance of5 feet from the existing home rather than the
required 10 feet.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
,
,
....
i;~
.
308 Turnpike Road
02-7-37
.
Yuriand Vera Dreizin
.
'\
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
308 Turnpike Road (Map 9) (02-7-37)
Yuri and Vera Dreizin, Applicants
Date:
July 17, 2002
Yuri and Vera Dreizin, with property located at 308 Turnpike Road, are requesting a variance
from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to
build a second stall garage addition to the side of the existing home. This addition requires a
variance from building setback requirements. Below is the requested variance:
. The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks. City
Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot
lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width
between 70 and 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The
requested variance is for 7.75 feet off the required 11.25 feet to a distance of 3.5 feet at it
closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed garage addition.
According to City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, there are no drainage or utility easements on the
north side of the property where the proposed garage would be located. The City'S file on
this property reveals that a permit was pulled in July of 1950 for the construction of the home.
No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
Subject Property: 308 Turnpike Road
Yuri and Vera Dreizin, Applicants
..
"
I><
" ~
::::
.
-
4
~~ 01'
S
.... 022
"
~. 011 4'
..
.,. OZo
. ..
... 0"
. ;;;
.. Oil
;;;.
...~
:::~
~;
.
r (Revised 1/99)
.
Petition Number 0 'J. -1 -31
Date Received 7/ J./ 0)..
Amount Received SO", l>iJ
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1.
3.
Petitioner:
S3~drS~ If:~ ~r:n this p:i~"J
BZA Petition Date JUM...( I Lt, 2 0 0 ~
~l V ~ rtZ S& ~Z:-t" V\
Name30t> T {A ~ lAM 5)V[
Address 'l({- 0. Q 0 City/State/,Zip
1-63 . j -360 t6~/ ~l(6-?h~b/
Business hone Home Phone l
2.
.
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. Legal Description of proRerty involved in this petition (found on survey): .
L ~ 1, ~ ~ e1- s-. .s PfG fl/ G- c.. R- E E /1/
( . ,
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: y( Single Famil _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial
Commercial
Institutional
Bus. & Prof. Office
. Other
r
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
bt(.~U.;~ ().JL~ottd g~ p-lj~uv1 'i-o. U~Slt'~
cdia.eL) &<<e ,~ru- ~ ~ ~IA &-<< It 'w-I'V'~
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9.
10.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this apE!!cation are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 5 VI ()t)representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
Y:J.h~ ~~~
SignaturSj'of Applicant S
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
r
.
.
.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project)
Print Name Na~s' l~ ,SDfD U ~.e~
Comment l;n"o ~ _
Signature <')'~ .~. ,~
Print Name /;:eo#Le~ ,4 / /er~
Comment /10 f//'LJ' ;~ ::T n7'/1Jc
Signature ~~~'~l>rl Address
~[J9~ .f
Address) I uIV.~ IU.
-!ZJ
/~ U/Ou/d .&e
2U~<h l{~
Print Name
Comment
Signature Address '3 () I r~
PrintName '0~~ . \\1,\\~C'<--. ~ Dc,~
Comment ~~ ~ .~ '5 ~ r \h.::
Signature ~.'~ Address 3 0 ~ 1~1t~k. ~1
r
Print Name
. Comment
Signature ]J~ o1~ Address
Print Name ;,1/111 tJL 0 d U )'-t') ~,
Comment YJ1Mw[ ~, th ~ ~<"
4tiL "5r/s r'
Signature
Print Name
Comment
trOD T:-uev(u1u (L~
Irr~. L~) 11 W~ ~u: Ii- Ih
-f-wo gy fhYe
-rVVV1f~.. ~L
~ Ie;
?l ~
J1q:] S"') t', 'l
(?J!~
Signature~~~CP~Address 31g -j~ ~,J,
. Print Name C-~A L r8 ( {.~
Comment
.
Signature
Print Name
Comment:
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
~
Address
Address
Address
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR Yuri Dreizen
308 Turnpike Road
Golden Valley, MN
.
I
I '1.... 'iJ
L. L.J I 17
.......
-., 890,1-3
I I I/'>
I "'f' I()
..... L,., I """ J
.
I "".1, I 1
L....... I II
.
,
}
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
\
8$~.o
'-
I
..1. "
/ /'. I - '-
.... ~'/, c;....
Legal Description:
Lot 7, Block 5, SPRING
IIn./f
Z.~ oj:. J.,j,"1E
G AP.A r,t:
')...1-
GREEN.
Sf)
l'i,5'
\
~ fa1-?
.3l>
Benchmark: TNH @ 401 Turnpike Road.
N.G.V.D. 1929 adjusted elevation = 888.103 feet.
B~7. 'I II
JI$ffZ- 5'4
.-.-- --
l...1
'I
I
_I
. 8,ff.~~
~
q
~
~
.~
~
~
~
I hereby .certify that this is a true and correct representation
of ~ survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of
the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible
encroachments, if any, from or on said land.
As surveyed by me this 3r~f~~:::
Herb F. Lemire RLS
Minnespta Reg. No~'i3349
4416 Abbott Ave. N
Robbinsdale, MN 55422
Phone: 763.537-0497
-/?~aJ..SB8(}.2(. '/0'''/5-
!: !2~:>~ :~'FlJ
?n~~
"
oftJ
/P.3P'#
C"f/c . :>71>4 '
CPICk
It'! Il~U<-A//
,!./p//5 IE ;;
$3
'-', /d (;dtlCR.$'f.G~
. 1JR!v.~ W .4:y.~ : . :'~. .
~
t
~
~
~
~
J
,I
6' "l4-117
. f.: I
'~ '
..\--' ~: ~
.~ ~,
J( S',"t.~
16
'K.89t>.7
I
I
~,
I
1"t:),o~-AJ88~Z~' /1:) "'W-
"':",.,,, ~ ~ - :-\
I I
I /. 7- If
1.-_ (,,, , ~J
",tn, 3
ZS
I ,)" 'I~~
67t'IVV Jf/,IJ,
11/1/ t$
Scale: 1" = 30'.
o Denotes iron monument
xooo.o = Existing elevation.
Bearings are assumed
.
.
.
.
wwmci.~Um_JJ.~y
7 -9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
308 Turnpike Road
Yuri and Vera Dreizen, Applicants
Yuri and Vera Dreizen, with property at 308 Turnpike Road, have
petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance
from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to
construct a garage addition to the existing home. This garage addition
requires a variance from building setback requirements. The following is
the requested variance:
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) (2) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code
states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or
structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following
requirements: In the case of lots having a width between 70 and
100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The
requested variance is for 7.75 feet off the required 11.25 feet to a
distance of 3.5 feet at it closest point to the north side yard
property line for the proposed garage addition.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
.:
,",
"
.
130 Edgewood Avenue
North
02-7-38
.
Marcia Anderson and Gary
Berman
.
See Large Size Plans and/or Survey in
Planning Department
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/ 763.593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
130 Edgewood Avenue North (Map 17) (02-7-38)
Marcia Anderson and Gary Berman, Applicants
Date:
July 17, 2002
Marcia Anderson and Gary Berman, with property located at 130 Edgewood Avenue North,
are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants
have approached the City to build a room and garage addition to the existing home. This
addition requires a variance from building setback requirements. Also, a survey was
submitted for this construction project and it was discovered that the existing home and
gazebo do not meet building setback requirements. Below are the requested variances:
. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks.
City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side
lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a
width of more than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested
variances are for .4 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.6 feet at it closest point
to the north side yard property line for the existing home and for 3.9 feet off the required
15 feet to a distance of 11.1 feet at it closest point to the south side yard property line for
the proposed garage addition.
. The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory
Buildings. City Code states that the gazebo shall be at least 5 feet from any side lot
line. The property owner is requesting a variance for the existing gazebo to exist a
distance of 3.9 feet from the north side yard property line.
I
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in May of 1951 for the
construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
.
...~~
lr,
if)
1/5
....
1/5
'Z.
n,.
I
""
~
-
~
....
.
.
.
5+
100'
100
100
100
lOa t 100 I IOd
....... t50o.~ ......
lOb
100
-----
.... 'l.~S'
.
>~~
"C=C"
"C .,.....
-n~
_. _. f)
n = .....
=>"'=
..... = .,
f'-I Q. Q
~"C
., ~
~ .,
Qq
= ..
~w
~Q
= l'!'j
~~
~~
., Q
a Q
= =-
= >
". ~
~
~
.
Petition Number: o? "' 7 - J ~
Date Received: ~ /d-/O?-
Amount Received: ~t)"Dv
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street Address of property involved in this petition:
130 Edgewood Avenue North, Golden Valley, MN 55427
. 2. BZA Petition Date: July 23, 2002
3. Petitioners: Marcia Anderson & Gary Berman
130 Edgewood Ave. N., Golden Valley, MN 55427
Business Phone: 612/341-7646 (M-Th)
Home Phone: 763/541-0475
4. Petitioners are property's owners.
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
The south 100.00 feet of the north 900.00 feet of the East Half of the
Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 118,
Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part t~k@n for street,
being part of Lot 3, Auditors Subdivision No. 322. (Provided 1rom most recent
abstract of title, last reviewed May 5, 1993.)
.
6. Type of property involved: Residential, Single Family
.
7. Detailed description of buildings, additions, and alterations involved
this petition:
Petitioners propose to add a kitchen/dining roomlfamily room and entryway
addition to the south side and back of the existing home, as well as a new
attached, two-car garage and covered walkway connecting the house and th~
new garage. Attached site plans show the location of the entry and back
addition, and the new garage proposal.
The addition will also involve remodeling of the existing kitchen and
small entryway, and will require removal of the existing detached,
single-car garage.
Variances are requested for the following portions of the project:
.
a) Existing detached garage is not represented accurately on the
original site plan on file with the city, and does not meet rear
setback requirements for distance behind the existing house. The
new garage would be attached to the house by a covered
walkway.
b) There is an existing gazebo at the far north and rear of the
property, which is not represented on any site plan on file with the
city. It is about one foot short of the required 5" side property line
setback, at about 4 feet (on an angle). The property owner on that
north side property line approves of the location.
c) The new addition will conform to required setback requirements.
.
d) The new garage would require a variance for the south sideline
setback. Instead of the required setback of 15 feet, the garage
wQuld be at 11 feet, one inch from the south property line.
However, the plan maintains a full 14 feet between the petitioners'
proposed new garage and the neighbors' existing garage, to allow
access to both back yards. The property owners to the south have
reviewed the petitioners' plans and signed the review form (see
Signatures section). They have indicated to petitioners that they
are primarily concerned about maintaining the 14 feet of access
space between their existing garage and the proposed garage.
.
e) Petitioners request a stipulation to allow for the main house
addition to be completed this year (Fall 2002), and the new garage
and covered walkway to be completed within two years, rather
than the standard one year term of the variance). Ideally,
petitioners want to do all the proposed construction at once, but for
financial reasons may need to delay construction of the new
garage, pending outcome of final bids and financing. Should only
the addition be built now, a temporary variance would be needed
because the non-conforming existing garage would be closer to
the new side addition than code requires. (NOTE: This clause is
included in the application as of 7/2102, but may become moot by
the time of the hearing, if bidding and financing is finalized
successfully. )
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
.
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Statement of reasons, necessity or hardship which provide
grounds for the granting of this waiver:
The addition and new garage proposed by petitioners will
substantially increase the home's property value. as well as help to
increase property values in the adjoining neighborhood, which has
seen one major remodeling and a new two-story house built in the
last few years. Other neighbors are also planning improvements.
.
The plan brings the property up to date by creating what is now a
standard: a two-car garage that is attached to the house, rather than
a small garage, detached. This plan, however, requires the small
setback variance to fit both the garage and the attached walkway into
the south side section of the property.
.
Because the lot is very long and wide, the proposed addition and
garage still take up a small proportion of the total lot size. The
proposed garage and walkway are designed to provide a visual step-
back to the neighbor's nearby garage, so the plan should improve the
view both from the street. and from the south neighbors' yard.
The requested staging of this variance (two years to construct the
garage), is intended to package all possible variances into one
proposal. with full disclosure of plans and options to the city up front.
Besides giving the petitioners some "breathing space" in terms of
construction and financing arrangements, it should save time for
petitioners, city staff and board members overall instead of possibly
having to go through a second variance request later. Please note,
however, that petitioners will be trying to obtain a building permit to
complete all construction, of both addition and new garage, at once,
beginning this fall.
10. A current survey is attached.
.
10. To the applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application
are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of
$50 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
~~
Signature of Applicant
~/~
Signatu of(pplicant
Date: JJ/y ;;Z I ,)..0 D.::L.
\
.
.
.
.
'The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a comer, this
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project.)
Print Name :r~
Comment
WitseJLbUfSf?_r
Signature r<td~ Address IN @~cd Av~ /J
PrintName SGLl L.)v~6UJt~€r
Comment Ihere 13 (JL dX5CIe pf111('~ ~+wev1 '+fLe su-rve~s.
{,jQ.., LUDuJ,d y\~- ~\-o Y\f\n ; fl1-a 'l~ Q^\ Clrpr()p(~ -k djS111fl e <:
Signature ),'11( iA ~~_{ Address i2Lf 6~\t){J;;;ruA";-'^~-'
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
.
.
.
.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a comer, this
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This. petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project.)
Print Name ~ C) CI i" 5 5:
Comment
Signature
Comment
Signature Address / 07 ~~ /Ill
C;(/!h- tJ~) /11.1"
Print Name S 0.1-. LJ) , f:A;tUL
Comment ~reJ c4 ~U 3 -N,~ .- ho1 ~. h~
~ '*' ~h~ p~i4L ijJJ(~. k~ haa;~
Signature ~~ Address /11 P~/d ~ '-.j..
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
The applicant will need to obtain the signaturesof all adjacent p:operty owners. This inclw
a\l properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the grantin!
this waiver could have on your property. An property owners adjacent to the subject propE
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may pre$ent th
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to theproj
other statements regarding the project)
Print Name l ~~OL CJ.a..rte
comme~i~~~~ WGiLl& incn
Slgnatm -.- - - - · - Clcax-i:e. Address ~ J v=; ~t~
Print Name
Comment
.
Signature
Ac!ldress
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
.
'\,
....
~'
.
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
MQ('K fV\C(OWt b s
aa~J-~ ri ~(~Jed~ .~~)
4~_
-rUJ11f~
~
Address I4hEd~~ Wood ,4ve tJ t;olck"1 tb(ley /vIW
Address
Signature Address
Print Name
. Comment
Signature Address
Print Name
Comment:
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
.
Address
Address
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
From: Scott Newland TO: MarCil. ...", "'..',
.
. ,. -. . '. ...... '.
I
.
~.
.-/
.-'
)
Hatdling indicates new roof
areas over ackIiIOn. Ink and
new garage
>.-..-.
,
. '.
-
lr-e-
~
-
NEWLAND
A'lcAlnCTUlE
t NorN
~4: ." ~ .,'
__ ..._ .~n.lJ!''\!.'. ,10...... So"'"
,Io\o~ iifU.Tf;illi'"
Anderson & Berman Addition
G*tYllrt,......
I
...~
-
J
,........' .,!:.\!t.'!. ..,,1.... lJ!L"l!
,""",,';';;;.;j;.;"'-......'''-
___" , ..~,,_ ..i...1..2.L'!.1~J"'Jl....
....., ._,...... ceiihi..
.
~_.
'.-'.-'-'"
. ~~
~ $>
~;,
-~ ,r
0>t--
~ --
S ~
~ ~
--<Q
~ r
,- V'>
~ -;-
~ t
~
. ~
~
'-, I
'0
t@_.,.
..-....-"
.-'
.... ..
.~
J":..
~
~
.~
'-',
f (
S t
~ ~
.'-~
<- ~ + '~------i
~~, ......<.
Q'~
;-
V'. '" <:"" Jf
~ '.~
~, .
;'ffl
"~
. , . ~5;f;;
"", f;t. .
:,.
'?2
:?" ~
:: :~~ ~,
":!. ::... 1.4
.' '> :z 4;
", ~~, /t,r,,-,";:'
;y ." ;',' J, ~-~
rf' r:'
,". ,-, ,..
~~
~<O
. r s
[
<l "" I
$ ~
\L-
....J-4.-
~r
J
!
,...
~
\
~
-\
~
\'--
.I /
.
'"
,
o
~
CA
.
..'*il. ::~
tt~
~. ~
>1' ,4
1~M
.".~..., f""
'~,,'V
-""-_.4t""
.,~ If.
~ '''':\
~- .'"11/' .
>:-- " '" ~ '\,...1'; c'
~:, "t -,~
..j" ,'.
.;i.,' '~,-
.~"
0_< ,"f"";f ~_~
,'h ~
--*-.~
.--.-------- '" ~
f '. . . ';~:..!, :.>t~
-~ ~
~
~' -e,
r;'). ',$'
--~-
~
v
~
~.
=t). '--
~
~
f-
~
~
~
--'
r
;"r ~
fb i:1
i ~ .~
......
~-s $....
~~.. ~,-
'1 ~/~:~.
~ f ~.. \
'-'''oS
I'
~
c.. -
~ ,.
" \,.. L!
I,. ~
'. '~A
"~~
,..
~
~
,
'.
'.
'\
\
\
\.,.~
( ,
~
S\
...,
~\
t -' ·
.L/..
'" .
"
\
\ . "
\ Y"
\ ,,'"
\. ~ / ""
\ ./
\ "
'.""
,.~
\\ \.
..~~ ///"-~-~\\
.... ...~/ \. ./-'" ... \
~"/.-/ ". j'/ ..,...:-:-u
... "or .....""... -'.'
, , ,"'"- ..' .' \
.' '\ \\ ....-:<::......... .;?' ......:...... "
/' ..~....2~:=~~~,.~>::.;?... \
".
,r \,
\,
... .......,....~:.~_..... ."
",,,~;,r
~~~:>"'''
.;.-:.~;~>-r...
/
I
"
,I
I
..
\
\
\
\
\
--~~...,.
. _.._~ V
/;;,-;.
...;:f""'~
,,~~
,~
~?-:.r
w
~ '
jf
t
~
~
f'
",.,;"'"
'1'
.'"
....;.;..,;.:.,"',,:,...
../'
----
""
~/9
~
.
.
"
~
i;I
I
I
"
Ii
'~
11'4"
IIIlIII
I
i
I
~
I
1
....
--~------------------
,-
I
~-- -- - - - - - -1
...
-,,, = =--'- = ~-"I
[]
L_ I
i
I
--1" :-~ =- :::: .:::: .;-F =
1 II
I'
I I
, I!
I
I'-
"
i
il
",LI,
oM'
, !
-
.a
, I
l \
-4
[ i
I L ._~ ...- ~ -- _.-. ..- -- --
L_ l._ ___ ___ -~ -- ---- -
I
Ii
I ,I
I.'~-:-: ==- -.' = =~,J
I
I
J
1
i\ '
J
I
I,
t(1 J If) 7-
..
wwmci'~Mm"vlt~ Y
7-12-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
****** REVISED ******
130 Edgewood Avenue North
Marcia Anderson and Gary Berman. Applicants
Marcia Anderson and Gary Berman, with property located at 130
Edgewood Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of
Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The
applicants are proposing to build a room and garage addition onto the
existing home. This proposed addition requires a variance from building
setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, a
survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the
existing home and gazebo do not meet building setback requirements.
Below are the requested variances:
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code
states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or
structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following
requirements: In the case of lots having a width of more than 100
feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested
variances are for .4 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of
14.6 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for
the existing home and for 3.9 feet off the required 15 feet to a
distance of 11.1 feet at it closest point to the south side yard
property line for the proposed garage addition.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code
states that the gazebo shall be at least 5 feet from any side lot
line. The property owner is requesting a variance for the existing
gazebo to exist a distance of 3.9 feet from the north side yard
property line.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
.
~
....
..
.
6420 Golden Valley Road
02-7-39
.
Jeffrey Polinchock
.
~..
.
.
.
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
6420 Golden Valley Road (Map 16) (02-7-39)
Jeffrey POlinchock, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
Jeffrey Polinchock, with property located at 6420 Golden Valley Road, is requesting
variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached
the City to build a room addition to the rear of the existing home. This addition requires a
variance from building setback requirements. Also, a survey was submitted for this
construction project and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building
setback requirements. Finally, because of the proposed room addition, the detached garage
would also require a variance from accessory building requirements. Below are the
requested variances:
. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks.
City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side
lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a
width of more than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested
variances are for 5.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 9.5 feet at it closest point
to the east side, yard property line for the existing home and for the proposed addition.
. The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings.
City Code states that the detached garage shall be located completely to the rear of the
existing home. The property owner is requesting a variance for the detached garage for
this requirement.
The City's file on this property does not contain the original building permit for the home, but
Hennepin County's property record system states that the home was constructed in 1938.
No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
.
.
Subject Property: 6420 Golden Valley Road
Jeffrey Polin chock, Applicant
2.3T.S
L-
7n
'1t Pt.....
-K.'" 5t.Kf
'11 0, 411
6 Ds 5121
~
(rqr defails qf Iqls ZSO tq Z'7
~: Dl~~ ;~l:d') . >t- ~.\
::~'~~:i :
~ I~ ~ I~ ~ ~
t,l. 714 't" t"., UI
I Z" I
.~
;:
lo
~
;;
'b
C>
z
..--Soo'
~
!!:
....
!;
~
....
f
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
Petition Number
o ;1--1 '?;, OJ
'1/<7-/ D 'J-
Date Received
Amount Received gO. 00
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
fcL/ZO
j?..[)
i c:, V
I
,(VlN .. S S- --f~ 7
G 0 <... 0 t,~ V q-"L-cY
2. BZA Petition Date
3.
Petitioner: i7?'?~ey S. ~G.mCCfbC-l\
Name
~r~s~ 0 G 0 '- 0 &V vi !rLuY f~la~ i /<1-V Syt~
~2- 3&") - J' 7? ~ ?' 63 - .,2. ()rf ,- 0 V2-L~
Business Phone Home Phone
CE"U- ~rz)L'-{7-Z61J
If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
4.
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
S'rc.T
oS' JILt/' 1;'1
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential:';i Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office
Other
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
s ~ I)--T r t9CffCiV
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed.
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ SO. i?D representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
~PPI~
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
.
.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project.)
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
Print Name ~ <:!j!<Jm~,. .
. Comment t+-1~ -b> LU i ~
- I
.
Signature _~~~
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address Qtt3Z ff v' R~.
tJ 0 fZ- ({j ptlliJ ti
.
Address
/1 L Ie A t9t.J::\04
Address
.
~~~ 0.:2'& $.!.'-~
fF CALC;\J\.JIo.1!D PCSlT\C1"
....A
"'I
J
%,
0\
~-
~~
08
~\
~,
1'i 82'20'15" E
--~-
\
rWCCC ro<c!
"9\\
~\ .
'"
~
t'i
f/ Ii
~ -
.rv
--
ADVA^TCE SURv'EYLNG & EATGI1VEERIAT:
co.
.
,
.
~~
,co
.
.
.
.
.
24.0
5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 MinnelOnka. M1' 55345 Phone (952) 4747964 Fax (952) 4748267
SURVEY FOR:
JEFFREY POLINCHOCK
III
\
10
--.I
Ul,-"
0-.1
o~
\' 0>,
\{"T1
SURVEYED: July. 2002
DRA.HED: July 2. 2002
r'
~ ......\.J
.rJ
(j
~f/J
.rv
,ouNO I~ON
__'00.03--
S 82'20'57" V4
COLIJEN VALLEY
,
\\~ ,,'OIl
ROA.D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lots 429 and 430. Belmont. Hennepin County. Minnesota.
SCOPE OF WORK:
1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The
scope of our services does not include determining what you own. which is a legal matter.
Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel.
if necessary. to make sure that it is correct. and that any matters of record. such as easements. that
you wish shown on the survey. have been shown.
2. Showing the location of existing improvements ~e deemed important.
3. Setting new rnonuments Or verifying old monuments to mark the comers of the property.
4. While we sho~' proposed improvements to your property. we are nOl as familiar with your
plans as you are nor arc we as familiar with the requirements of governmental agencies as their
employees are. We suggest that you review the survey to continn that the proposals are what you
intend and submit the survey to such governmental agencies as may have jurisdiction over your
project to gain their approvals if you can.
ST A~DARD SYMBOLS & CO~VE~T10!'-:S:
"... Denotes 1'2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235. set, unless
otherwise noted.
I hereby cen:ify that this plan. specification. report or survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supe;'"\"ision and that I am a licensed Profe5sional Engineer and
Profes5ional Survevor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
.~
(0",. , ,o~ ({.....-: "';., '
~1 f\nfl.~" 1" \) r,~: ~r, r;
~..,., H p.,..l'>rD::7 LPS '\ t'.".::;
~.:~~>.> . _. "c:, . ._. 0.. . .. O. '_"_'
GRAPHIC SCALE
~ '~ r
- - -
- -
2,t
.f)ff?;: il'U. OPO?S.!;
( IN" FEET )
~,.J
91ITC.o::lIIA.lnC' o:.OIJ.^DU
~Qn:~T ~n en Tn~
.:z-(b?1 7
6420 Golden Valley Rd, Golden Valley, MN 55427
.
I am requesting a variance for the building of the proposed addition, as illustrated on the
attached survey. My variance is requested due to the fact that I have a nonconforming
building as described to me by the city planners and building inspectors of Golden
Valley.
My non-conforming building was created as a result of a property subdivision that
occurred approximately 3 years ago. I own two parcels of property approximately 50 feet
wide and 150 feet deep. Approximately 3 years ago, my current homestead was located
on 3 parcels with approximately the same dimensions. One of the lots was parceled and
subsequently sold. My homestead is located approximately 9'7" from the NE property
line, on the middle of the 3 parcels. My detached garage is located solely on the south
west parcel. The parceling was done by the previous owner of the homestead.
According to my understanding of the city ordinances my side set back requirement if the
two lots are treated as one lot, with a frontage of 100' is 15'. If I treat the lots
independently, my side setbacks change to 5' and 10' respectively, however city
ordimmce prohibits building a garage. on a separate lot. Therefore my homestead is
nonconforming in that I don't meet the setback requirements with 100 feet of frontage.
Or treating the lots separately my garage is nonconforming.
.
At the time of the parceling of the property my homestead with garage as currently
situated no longer met Golden Valley city ordinances. No variance was requested at the
time of the parceling. My variance request is to add an addition to the back of my home
maintaining the existing 9'7" NE setback of my current home. All other setback
requirements will be adhered to.
Requested by,
Jeffrey S. Polinchock
Owner, 6420 Golden Valley Rd.
.
PATRICIA BURRETS
.
July 16, 2002
Mr. Dan Olson
City of Golden Valley, Inspections Department
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Dear Mr. Olson:
I may be unable to return from a business trip in time to attend the July 23rd hearing to address a
55-foot variance requested by my next-door neighbor Jeff Polinchock for his property at 6420
Golden Valley Road. Therefore I am writing you to express my strong reservations and objections.
Even if the plans for the addition were within the setback required @eaving 20 feet from
foundation to foundation) it would not be desirable. The available light, sun, air circulation, open
space, and privacy would be diminished gready. However if you bring it even closer, by granting a
variance of 55 feet it would be a near disaster for me. I would be virtually cut off from all of the
. light and sun that are vital for me.
The proposed addition would add approximately 1,925 square feet, triple its present size, and
plants it just 145 feet from my foundation. This is to close for comfort. I know it would gready
decrease the value of my property, its desirability, and saleability. I have shown the survey to my
realtor and she agrees.
The structure would create a virtual tunnel effect, 80.7 feet long by 145 feet wide, extending 15
feet beyond the entire west side of my house. If the plan calls for eaves, I calculate the resulting
space between the eaves would be 9.6 feet of open space to the sky above. Again it would literally
have the effect of cutting off the natural light, sun, air circulation, surrounding open spate, and
privacy that my house now offers. These were the most important considerations when planning my
home because I have a condition that causes problems for myself if I am deprived of sun and
natural light for long periods of time.
.
In my home the windows that capture light in three bedrooms, a bath, and a porch face west
andwould direcdy look out to the addition and its roofline. The lower level and family room would
be void of light throughout most of the year. The yard and deck in effect would loose half the
visual open space and most of the sun affecting my landscaping that includes a vegetable garden,
-2-
.
pines, maples, and other plantings. I would look out from these windows and from my yard to a
brush pile within the thirty feet and a run of old fence on the lot line. I would welcome you coming
to see the sight and the inside of my home.
This is not a hardship situation, considering that Jeff has 50 feet to his west in which to
expand. Instead he is asking for a huge variance that will gready impact my property. It is difficult
to lillderstand why he is not utilizing this portion of his property rather than encroaching on the
open space unless he is preserving it to sell. In his enthusiasm maybe he has not considered the
effect it would have on my home, its surroundings, and myself.
I am speaking of aesthetics, light open space etc. because I think they are vital. I believe
preserving and protecting them are the reasons behind the setback regulations the City of Golden
Valley has established and requires. I hope and trust you will continue to do so in this case. 5.5 foot
is a large number when considering the short distance we are dealing with.
.
Thank you for your serious consideration. in this matter. I don't wish to make it difficult for
Jeff by objecting to his requested variance but I believe there are other alternatives. (Jeff mentioned
one; moving his garage behind his house and erecting a fence and building his addition on the
garage site.)
I am simply looking out for my best interests, investment, and the enjoyment I have in my
home.
Sincerely,
~~
Patricia A. Burrets
Golden Valley Homeowner
.
6414 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD. GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA. 763-593.9683
PHONF:: 763-593-9683. FAX: 763-593-9683
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
www.dg.Mm_J1~y
7-9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
6420 Golden Valley Road
Jeffrev Polinchock. Applicant
Jeffrey Polinchock, with property located at 6420 Golden Valley Road,
has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances
from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a
room addition onto the rear of the existing home. This proposed
addition requires a variance from building setback requirements. Also,
during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the
property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet
building setback requirements. Finally, as a result of this addition, the
detached garage would become non-conforming and would also require
a variance from accessory building requirements. Below are the
requested variances:
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code
states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or
structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following
requirements: In the case of lots having a width of more than 100
feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested
variances are for 5.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of
9.5 feet at it closest point to the east side yard property line for the
existing home and for the proposed addition.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code
states that the detached garage shall be located completely to the
rear of the existing home. The property owner is requesting a
variance for the detached garage for this requirement.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
,
..
,
..
.
7155 Madison Avenue West
02-7 -40
.
Greg Stotko
.
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
7155 Madison Avenue West (Map 14) (02-7-40)
Greg Stotko, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
Greg Stotko, representing the property owner with property located at 7155 Madison Avenue
West, is requesting variances from the Industrial zoning code (Section 11.36). The applicant
has approached the City to construct a building and parking lot on this vacant lot. The new
building and parking lot require variances from setback requirements. Below are the
requested variances:
· The first requested variance is from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (A) Front Yard
Setbacks. City Code states that parking areas shall be setback at least 35 feet from
any front yard property line. The requested variance is for 18.2 feet off of the required
35 feet to a distance of 16.8 feet for the proposed parking lot at it closest point to the
front yard property line along Madison Avenue West.
· The second requested variance is from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C)(3) Side Yard
Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a structure and the
side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirement In the case of lots
abutting another Industrial zoning district, the south side yard setback shall be 20 feet.
The requested variance is for 10 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 10 feet at
it closest point to the south side yard property line for the proposed building.
. The third requested variance is from Section 11.36, Subd.7 (A) and (B) Parking
Requirements. City Code states that in the Industrial zoning district, one parking
space is required for each 250 square feet of office space and one parking space for
each 500 square feet of warehouse space. Based on these requirements, staff
estimates that the required number of parking spaces is 21. The variance requested is
to reduce the number of required parking spaces to 16.
Review bv Enaineerina:
. In speaking of this variance request with City Engineer, Jeff Oliver PE, he stated that the
following condition should be made a part of any variance approval:
1. Concrete curb and gutter be installed for the parking areas, as per City Code
Section 11.70, Subd. 7 (C).
The building that stood on this site was demolished in 1998. No other pertinent information
was found in the file.
.
.
2
.
Subject Property: 7155 Madison Avenue W
Greg Stotko, Applicant
l' .l' ..,
F ~,,~' NEW
. ~~,,~'I:j- i 5.!.~
.... ~'~~ € i~.~'j~I"'''. ~ lAo'
~ ~1. ~~ "" lc,. 1J'H~ ,t. ....
~'I"" . \I4'W~\ ·
J7~$'
"'':
I
I
I
I
I
I
, !
,(
I
HOPE
,o-
r/55
tflf~
'f' - I) ..-
20$JROAIlJZ""- '1f"~o "";\ I~"
13
~
w..1
- --- - - -- --Sli's-- ---- - - ---
~..
~~}
~~:!it
12
.
I
I
.~ ~ g
r-'
oC
West
----- - - ---5":0-----------
:;s. t.
~~~
..._~
II
w..f
HI.,'
, ..
10
i
...
~
.
-iIQ ().
",,,,
'"
~7
"3D
~----I
I
.
5 ~~
~
..,
~
4 l~
.
3
~
2
'I!
o
~
lN8".f8'++"W
.
,<)
I"
IIlt.T/)
30
C)
~~
..;
~
'"
'"
oQ
"
"
....
I
3 ~L
I,
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
Petition Number
0')./7- '-(l>
7/">-{ I/?-
Date Received
Amount Received ISo. 00
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
11 '5~ MAt>i5fN Mf.-
BZA Petition Date '7/ ;r} lor
.
2.
3. Petitioner: G(LEb ~o"n<.o
Name
I~03 EU>\)L( 5-r:
Address
~-6l-1-BO -0055
Business Phone
SCcr!{<O /SPtULDLfJJC- r1rJS71_LI t '{ {O JJ
~5nN05IMN. 55033
CityiState/Zip
051 -437 - 2.021
Home Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
tOM I1k41L (OWN.f-/L) ff"(I-noNEIL Iv 6€-NE-Ml- ~TlU'Je-70fL fo~
-It4€-. OWN~
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
Lo,..- 1 At-.U> Tttt. NOi!--rH 351"01( ~'1 or:: Lo-r ft:, I Bi..C~ 3
.
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: _ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial
Commercial _ Institutional _ Bus. & Prof. Office X.
. Other
.
.
.
7.
Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
'f'ltE ~liLl)/~~ WiLL (317..-- A- D"'f.- ~lo{l.H Roc):..-Fttt:-i.- BLoC-t,<- 5?fU,(,l7I.1LL tJ/7/i-
A- vli
tv! ItA- Sfi It- l3t/1 L ,...
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Propos~d
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed,
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. .
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ I 5D representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION AP ICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
.
NOlETO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project)
Print Name
Comment
Su,-L 0 3",~
VlQ fJ'('ohkW\ J~ <{oj kuk
'b8U
~J
tv If?
~
(lAc.. <,
Signature
Address 2 '/ZO A.jw~
/t/e ;J
.
Print Name_Lb~ 17e.vA 11o?;- 9l4'5iOO
Comment fliM..b Wt-1J.t. Pta: fWJb 11/E. ]){D tJ(y{ iJ-A-i/1L PlZt;;fBLG~ IdrrN- ridE..
ftJ:AIC'L/,. tJ;:. CiJuUJ tJWIi/L (...If- { 7f;&~{~ -FelL tJts Sic;.AJIf1t1~
Signature Address 11 So HAf>I.:fVN AUf. w.
Print Name
Comment
S~*- Moss
Signature 7;S;;i~
Print Name_f€-'7~~ (~UJtrJ A~ K 1')( 1~?.... 140- Neo
Comment 4. WIi-Il./L ~AJo/ ABu 76 (';G:r 4-1kU> ~F P~-Z€iL p",~ /iJ JdtM
f3G-J~ tJU'f of -zfJv:;Ai
Address d l{ If S j\J~ ""-- ,{J",
Signature
Address ~135 MAfJ/ SoN Pw,-//,J.iffT
.
.
o
o
o
o
.
o
()
(V)
C)
"
['--. 0
en CD
0> 0; 0
(V) ('J
" II II
(V) 1_' rr
O~
o
1--
en
Lj.J
S
::r --l
.:~ !fl
S' 0.
~
[1Qd]
d
d
[1Qd]
2)
~
tfl c; ~~
\f=J
1'--
Ln
M"Ov/vO oON
i 001
I
I
I
I
: )1\1 r'Y
('1'" IV ....'\,"'1
I
I
~-:l
I
I
I
9Z'50v
i.
in
o
("J
~~.,")J ,,,)
~.I"..W'l", 1
..~t1
I
i , '
---......---,.-'-'-------..-""f----.--., '
lOJ
,(J
iD-
r --_........ -l:. -----
'".
(.)
--")
r--~
j
I '1'1-'
i ! j
1'-1 i1-l
0; I I! ~ ~ 0
0> I r---, !C'J Oi 0
r::. +_ \(0 \ _ '111 I) ----=-...::t N
,/ j, .,,)':
( 1 I; 6: 9
~._",,_.J 0" I.i -.lI'"j (j\
(~ . 6_
I ,"- ,; -r::,()
i "Ij {j;7
'6' fY') ~ I,: ;~:;
o ,O! ..~-
~.",...E", 0 ; I
O'''!J'O :, --
N N 4J,;.".@i....~..u,---....~-
II II _~ II I( .
cr: f- fY') <J I v~
I t-
.1
-,-=--=-:...:..J
: ..::; '-f\ I,'
I ..~ -
:1
: (
ir'J"
I
: r-'---'
I ,
I !
I, rl ~ \
l~!
i
I
I
i
I
I
!
2.4 t,t.)
r'!~Vrt>/\'
~"'''-'l 0
N I ~
!...,
.
i
! . i.'
~.._-;--,,-j
\ j
I t
1 I
I ,
I '
.1" ..-1
- .
t~ ;
!ifl :
~- :
'0 '
001::: '
S.58
.~
-. -- ,---------v-U-v-A,3N-.--.----'-----'--~-.- ---- -- ~~,---,
8S 21.ZI J"OV/vO oOS
~:l/\V
.
d
~
c:::=::J
~
p
@?)
2)
(QJ
~
c:::=::J
001
Lf) C'\J
001
~ OSI
'9)~
OSI
OC~I
vU~ uc. uc. uc..c.",!"
1JUUe; "'!"II:'II:'U ~ ~ lIe;
O,",,~-"'...;;JI-OII....J
!".Co.
.
Stotko/Speedling Construction
Board of Zoning Appeals
City of Golden Valley
To whom it may concern,
The applicant Stotko/Speedling Construction representing the owner Tom Macht,
Minnesota Medical, Inc. is applying for ordinance waiver petitions for the property
located at 7155 Madison Avenue West.
Tom Macht. owner of Minnesota Medical, Inc. 622 Mendelssohn Avenue, Golden Valley
has had his business in the city since 1990. He has been leasing his office space since
1990 and when this property became available last fall he purchased it to build and own.
a new building to operate his business.
Minnesota Medical repairs and calibrates hospital equipment and sells, services
Physical Therapy Equipment in six states. Minnesota Medical is also working with China
on developing their high-tech medical equipment. Tom employees 8 people. of which 5
employees are gone 3 days out of week servicing hospital equipment throughout the
region. The truck traffic for deliveries is van type with an occasional semi-trailer.
.
Due to the size restraints of the property and the economic feasibility of building an
officelwarehouse, the size of the building needs to be in the 7,000 sft range. The building
will be a one story rock.face block structure with a standing seam metal front canopy.
The parking requirements set forth for the City of Golden Valley is 1 parking stall per 250
sft of office space and 1 parking stall per 500 sft of warehouse. The building will be 3500
sft of office or 14 parking stalls and 3500 sft of warehouse or 7 parking stalls for a total of
19 parking stalls.
The first petition is that the parking lot facing Madison Avenue be 16'.9" from North line
of lot 7 in lieu of the 35'.0",
The second petition is for the 19 parking stalls required to be changed to 16 parking
stalls. Due to the restraints of the site 16 parking stalls is the maximum that will fit
comfortably.
The third petition is for the building to be 10 feet from the south line of north 35'.0" lot 6.
This is consistent with the building at 2420 Nevada which is 5'.0" from the same lot 6
line. This will allow for more green space at Madison Avenue side of property,
Sincerely,
.
Greg Stotko
Stotko/Speedling Construction
.
.
.
.
. Be
WWW.ci.gOlden-Va/kj<mn.usY
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
7-9-02
7155 Madison Avenue West
Grea Stotko, Applicant
Greg Stotko of Stotko/Speedling Construction, who is representing the
owner of the property located at 7155 Madison Avenue West, has
petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from
the Industrial zoning district (Section 11.36 of the City Code). The
applicant is proposing to building a new building and parking areas on
this vacant lot. This construction project requires variances from the
following sections of City Code.
. Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (A) Front Yard Setbacks. City Code
states that parking areas shall be setback at least 35 feet from
any front yard property line. The requested variance is for 18.2
feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 16.8 feet for the
proposed parking lot at it closest point to the front yard property
line along Madison Avenue West.
. Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code
states that the distance between any part of a structure and the
side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirement: In
the case of lots abutting another Industrial zoning district, the
south side yard setback shall be 20 feet. The requested variance
is for 10 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 10 feet at it
closest point to the south side yard property line for the proposed
building.
. Section 11.36, Subd. 7 (A) and (B) Parking Requirements.
City Code states that in the Industrial zoning district, one parking
space is required for each 250 square feet of office space and
one parking space for each 500 square feet of warehouse space.
Based on these requirements, staff estimates that the required
number of parking spaces is 21. The variance requested is to
reduce the number of required parking spaces to 16.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be he.ld Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
"
.
7100 Madison Avenue West
02-7-41
.
Al Peters
.
.
'Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
7100 Madison Avenue West (Map 14) (02-7-41)
AI Peters, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
.
AI Peters, of Hearing and Service Dogs of Minnesota, with property located at 7100 Madison
Avenue West, is requesting variances from the Industrial zoning code (Section 11.36). The
applicant has approached the City to construct a dog kennel addition to the existing building.
This kennel addition requires a variance from setback requirements. In addition, a survey
was submitted for this construction project and it was discovered that the existing building
does not meet building setback requirements. Below are the requested variances:
. The first requested variance is from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (A) Front Yard
Setbacks. City Code states that buildings shall be setback at least 35 feet from any
front yard property line. The requested variance is for .1 feet off of the required 35 feet
to a distance of 34.9 feet for the existing building at it closest point to the front yard
property line along Madison Avenue West.
. The second. requested variance is from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C)(3) Side Yard
Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a structure and the
side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirement: In the case of lots
abutting another Industrial zoning district, the side yard setback shall be 20 feet. The
requested variances are for 5 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 15 feet at it
closest point to both the east and west side yard property lines for the existing
building; and for 15 feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 5 feet at it closest point
to the east side yard property line for the proposed dog kennel addition.
Previously, this property was denied for a variance request. In May of 1983, a variance was
denied for this property for a building addition and parking lot. The minutes from that meeting
are attached for your review. -
.
Based on the percentage of office and warehouse square footage within the building, the
Zoning Code would require 24 parking spaces for this property. The applicant has provided
a site plan showing approximately 10 parking spaces in the existing paved area, and room for
an additional 16 parking spaces in the existing gravel area. The applicant has indicated that
these 10 parking spaces are sufficient for the 6 employees on site. If the City determines that
.
.
.
these additional 16 spaces are needed, the City would require the applicant to pave the
gravel area, stripe for the parking spaces, and provide for concrete curb and gutter.
Therefore, the following condition should be made a part of any variance approval:
1. If the City's Planning and Development Director determines that additional parking
is needed, the applicant shall pave and stripe the existing gravel area on the north
part of the site to show this additional parking. Concrete curb and gutter shall be
installed for this parking area, as per City Code Section 11.70, Subd. 7 (C).
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in December of 1964 for the
construction of the building. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
2
.
.
.
Subject Property: 7100 Madison Avenue W
Al Peters, Applicant
.:rOF ;)(, NEW
~;(~il' \ ~.K
.., ~~;~ [ '~~ "!~:I,.:J. ~ o'
"" ~,~. ~. ':v'\o'. 1f'M~ t. ...
?O.&5'T', .. , '\.0, \Wl\'''\'~
'4$37" ~v: " ~.
e~t; ~ 1 r,{ i:t:~.
't]~ I ~:t~:
I r
I
I
I
!o
iJ>
~'Z
i-J>
~9.
.., iJ>
~=;~ ~'Z
O'\u,-b. ";-
I. ~~~ ~
ClD.tI..() ~
"'CD, \ t
I
,~ I
'(
I
y
'J.D, 163
. 'all-
~30~~12
163
"''''S8'IO''t
~..
'"
p~09
~
,\0 2 ~;;'\~
· ..,.__ $3 ~
HOPE
.. '~14'U ..
." ..s,s.''''- l$1I.1I t ..{: 'u' .'f"'~is5
... l_____ ____..u_,;: 11""
6i:~; 17". _.~;~.,.~, 40 ,40 . ~~'
13
~
~.
~~~.
+....r.
~....~
w,,1
- --- -- -- --~lof.~-- - --- - - ---
-
12
. ~
::
,,"
~~::
-::.:..~
or~.
Wtsl
----- - - ---S/,:o-----------
II
Welf
4"",
10
9
Welf
fJ7.SS
8
w..f
I". 77
I.tM'
fa,
18 ~
13
~
. .
100
TI4~.", AV all
o. ..
2'4.'.
~,~
" .~ . . I I
....,
I ~ C~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~OO.
. lQ ~
~ ...., ~
5 ~ Q.: ...
~ ..
- ~ ..;:
~ " ~~
4
....~.
C'..~'D. "
2"."
100
3
_ _ _ _ _ _ _J
I
2 ~: PART
;:1
I
~I 8
""
'"
..;
~
'"
C) '"
...
'"
Z "
'"
-
3 ~ (/)~
.... 2i=~
,.... ~
...'"
."~
~'" 0::.. ::::
~i
'"
IJJ~ -.:
..
... '"
>~ ~~
. '
~:;
0 ......
~ '"
<( ~~
:5.
r..~~~
... ~/...o~ .1r~
I
:>~,
-
.
~
8
N ".4"44 -t!.,. _ _
7
5
4
3
NE'(WELL
-J I".
6909
.
,.".1
,
...
<>
~
,..
()
a
-C) ().
..,....
.....
"a
". ,
~~
~
'Q
~
,~
~
'I!
()
~
I
''''
I"
1-
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
Petition Number () ). - 7 - 'f I
Date Received I /)of O~
.
Amount Received / So. 0 u
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
;?/flJ ~ ~ td
2. BZAPetmonDate ~~J-~/Jj.zp2-~
3. Petitioner: /? LAJV J1./~i~l... S"J .AI~~~AJ&-- /)yv/J .r~~)<.6 .I b~f IJFJi/J
Name - I2~J
^ S- J :; ~ S-.xl ,Ill 5'. h IL.r; JI1)V s-rr~
AddreSj, ~ ,roJQ P / ./ City/StatelZip r ?
6'),)..- :1/- ~ /40 oJ;J..- Jll- tA..L>9--'
Business Phone Home Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
_ ~ /1, t.w.M ~ {!tf11;7#.-' JPN6J:f't /snA
S-fi L..~" tJ~ M~~ 7pJf JlAAiJ?j1JQ;B~ Fo~ '" ~ tJ'l>l{ L/J Pl(f<, eJM.ff
~#~ Pl<.otJ~-LT'f.
5. legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
LPT I jj tlJc)(i,/ A1J1/6~r/J/;P'- -C~t;A71v4 ~NT~~
ACdJM/j!)~ 7D 7~6 kC/Ju~~ /LA7 "M~~.
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: _ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple DwelUng
Industrial~commerCial _ Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office
. Other
I.
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
.r6'~ A 17/1Ci1d) p~AbJ)"'6S
8. . (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of thi~ waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared bya regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed,
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is largerthan11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ / ..>t!J. 4trrepresenting th~
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~
Signature of Applicant
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
.
.
'\IOTES:
01:
1..
1 '"
o 1:
1..
'0:::::
N 89"5/'02" E
100.01
.,....
-". !rIM
Adjacent Building
Soutfl Uno oIlo1 12
?ttl"C\.
,;i.~ ~
f
f
f
II
II
iI
U.=~~
~
I.
II
j li
--- " ~----
~~~~=~~~.~': ;~~~~; ();~5:l;~~;:~~.~J~~~~~~-:~~_.-':'-=:~=.._
N 89.55 '55 ',' ,E ... ....
--- ~ --. MADISON AVENUE'":WEST'-~-'- ----
~'::'l;:~ .4~!'C ~ .35.518 5C:;l.!are .~ee' / 1),79 Acres
--.-
---
-""t
I
-!.'~_Cll'ld_~_~......!.. _
y
.'"
'I"~ ..
F
1.-
'il
~
..o.,t..--~
~().... ,
",""
'GIO
(ior'-I
-/f \~.
/ I
'...; -,.,...~ .......-"-'
~
.
~
"
"
) "
:; IPo~
! 0"'"
. '\. j oe-" '"D !
'\ ~ S,,\ i
~,. ~~ d
..
tl
.. ,I
. I
;'0
."'0
.. ,
Oll';)
!,'I'
O~
'"
15.0
I' \
U ~
!
i
i
ONE STORY
OFFICE/rrAREHO,USE
BUILDING
&<1g. AI'__9,lOO Sq. fl.
..~..Z!.PJ?._
~
J:l
~
E'
~
\
\
2.'- S...bject orOOC~i' is C!,.trrentJy sen.'eo by 5cnilory sellte". 'storm sewer, fleetr;c.
Gas. ana re/epIl0ne. <VI of wille'" access fhe DfOper!j' tnrough pI.JOIi(: l'ilJl'll-'of-woy
Ond/or '~C:lrdt!d t'~sel'Oents.
J) ~j above q"Ound ut;/i!y locotions hove been lield, lOCated os sngwl'l.
me 5.."'0'(:)'or /la$ .'101 ohysic:;lly located the ufldergfOCJfld 1;liUtiu. PRlOq TO ANY
'UCAii4fiON. COfWfJ.{:r GOPHf~ sr4TE: Q~( CALL FOR ON SIT( LOCAn(JN (612) 454,-0002
4) P"'opert)" does /Jot lie ",ifhl'fl .1")' flooo heza~ oreo.
TO: Grega'f M, itolO', erai.;; '. .,-"lgst"'o-n, US Bo...i(
one Cr::CGg~ ';:!e '!'!"liFen.:... ComGonj'
CF:RTlP:C.4 r;m'.;
;".'_~~'" to;!
1 2
o 1:
1..
1 1
T~;s =5 to ~t",.t;" rr~c: .'l.'" -lap 0" plat ant: f!'lo!l survei on .;....ich it. ;<;. Oosed we...e.m.Ode f)~ ;;
OCC'O:dc'!'.::!.' ,,,itf, "ui....mum StanCO-ro Detoil ,iieqt.iremencs fer 4l1A...'AC.')U Lena fitl'!: Sr.II1:eys, Jointly
estobli,'i~eCJ "'''Ie <;:jvp!ea 0., 41)'.4/A.CSM in . i!':o99. r::m:J includes /~emsl. 2. J, ~. 6. 7. ~13, 10, " C?nd , J
~~f~b/~'l '\t:;e~~~~' :;~n~;)(;:~~f~~:;~I'l~orOfr,,:~ ~~~~is~t~:;'O::~~II~~~ s~~:;~d 01 AU,,- ACSM on~ In
lfGAL Of.SCRIPT!ON
(as oe' T,'tle ;tj$ura"lceCommilmenr File No. 10021 I :516. dot~ March 25th, 2002,
iss:Jed ~y Chir:C'qo filte Insuro'1C'e Company)
Lo! !J. B~oCk '. ."[)VERtISING - CREATrIfCE:NTER. acC'oro;'IQ' to t.''le rer.:ort!ed ;)lac
the"eaf,. Hp"ttep;f1 COIJ"lty, Minnesota,
.
IEMARS-CABRIEL
D SURVEYORS. INC,
JO Harbor Lone No.
,",outh, MN 55447
~IJ3jj gg::g:~:
I
.-d-
.; I
~ J i
. ~I
~ '
li~
I
i
I ~
Ii;
~~
U
N
I'
r
o'
~
I .,
90 30
~.-
30 50
-"--l
Scale
30/t
Denotes Iron Monumel1t
I !Ie,eoy ~ertl1y thal this' RlI'Ve)'. DlDI! or repOrt __ I)repfNt:rJ OJ me
or ~ "'1 dil'ect ,~siol'l find lhal l.fI",," dilly Ret}Jster~ Lend
Surveyor ullthr the LUlU tII the Stat. of Ultlnestlto.
_ n'IJ(". t-
Dovi~ Y7rook
00" ~~l~
"" No.
11707 C
~ :
L[GEND
o - Denotes Manhole
Denotes Catch Bosin
t( - Denotes Hydrant
C .. Denotes Telephone SO~
'0' .' Denotes Gas Meter
.0- - Denotes Utility Pole
"OJ-6J
Scale '
'..30'
ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY I
' I
I
R<<J. "'0, -U!.!.L
0...., _ 6/12."10:2
~,t...".
[)ovid E. Croal!
Reg.'ster-ed loml SUTlI#!yor
Slate of Afir,''lesoto license No,22414
(seal)
C~\f.P\DRAW\ "640a.dw!;
PREPARtO F"OR:
Gregory M, Wold
.
.
.Jul 02 02 02:29F
Total Heatincr;
(763)535-0931
F. 1
7t1' .0.12:::;:: wi! :::'::ain tile. signatures:n 8djacortprope1ly owners. no::;...
aD properties abutting the applicanfs property and directly across the Itreet. If on a corner. this
means scron both ..ets.
NOTE TO ADJA.CENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
. Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Plea$e be aware of anv possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. An property owners 3djacent to the subject property
will receiVe 8 notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the 8dja~t property owner opportunity to comment
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project. objecting to the project or
other ...taments regarding the project)
.
.
.
P.81
PAGE: 0J
10=7635418223
13'34 HOSHAL ADVERTISING HSPM
87'~~~2~~~~"LYV' ~/;.~ b~~(~~~~14
~':\'- ,~' The applicant wiU oeed to obtain the- signatures of, all aQjacent -prop~rty owners; This .includes
all propertiEls 'abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street If on Ii corner, this
means eCfO$S both streets. _
NOTE TQ ~01~CE;q PROPERTY OWNE~~: This petitioflls appli~~ion for ~ivet of
- Ordinance(s) of th~ City Zoning Code. Pleal?e be aware of any possibte effect the gtanting of
- this walv~r could have on your property. Altproperty owners adjaoent to the subject property
: will recelv~ a notice of the B&std of Zoning Appeals hearing, at ~hich they m$Y present thefr
views. Your signature Is required onry to verify that you haVe been told about the request and
gives the adja~nt property owner opportunity to comment. .: .
, .
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project,. obJ.~ng to' the project or
othe.. .fatGmenfs r.gardintl tfle proJect) . .
.
~rint Neme .c~A/f/...4 #t1J s~ t-..
Comment _ .
SfgnahJre ~.~~*~~,\llDI+ AddreosL7' ;~ 0. ':
' '" ~~/
FrintName r;J.l40slc..' ,.
Comment
~~'~,=:J
signaiure dJ. 7j~ . 'AQdtess
-' ' -:.
~~, ~....;...;l~.,n.L..~.~k' n~ ~ ~'11
Print Name.
. '
Comment
Signature ~~
. Address
.
II' L
. .~
Prlrlt Name
Comment
.. ...
" ,,'
..
SfS':1sture _
Address
"
ffY
;;'
.
.
.
UI(U~!~UU~ lUD1~;Ol ~A4 loa 04"'4~~u~eN~~elN LU~1~11~~
\(g UUUUU;:
etG/27/20e2 17:29 6127295914 HSDM
The applicant wiJl need .to obtain the'signatures of, aU adjacent 'prop~rty Qwners~ ~is .includes
aJl properties 'abutting the applicant's property and directly across the streef. If on a corner, this
means across both streets. '
F'AGE 63
. .
NOTE TO AD,J~C~NT PROPERTY OWNEFt!;: This petitio~ is appDcation for w~ivet of
. Ordinance{s) of th~ City Zoning Code. Plefl~e be aware of any possib!e' effect the granting of
. this walv~r could have on your proparty'. All prOperty owners adjacent to the subject property
.. will receiv~ a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at whioh they may present their
views. Your signature Is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
giv~ the adja~nt property owner opportunity to comment. \ "
(Coltlments can contaIn language of agreeing with the project,. objecting to" the project or
other .tatem.nta r.;arding the project.) 7 _ t. ""0 J.-
~rintName~c...E- b H'OC.J)lM,' .. .
c~menl~~~~~...... ..
Print Name", 5'SlfJ.. 7 ~
Comment
Signature
Ac;ldress
Print Name._
. '
Comment
Signature .... .
, Address .. .
Print Name
Comment
'f .,
Signature
Address
"
FROM : N0RTHRIDGE PLUMBING C0. PHONE NO.
~".<'2'" ";3' "2"959'4
.
.
.
763 591 1550
1-51>>1
Jul. 02 2002 11:04RM Pi
PAGE 03
The applicent wUi need tel obtain the signatures of an adJecentproPlrty own....; Thla includes
.11 PrQperties .butting the apptieant's property and directly across the s1reet. If on IS comet. thle
m.... acrou. bQ~ ....
~(')~ TC ADJ'CENT !)ROPERl'Y.tJWN!RS: This PetittO('! Is apS)llcatlon for waJver f.lf
Ordtnance(e) o~ihe City ZQning Code. PI.... be aware of'''Y Si<*ibl,e' effeetthe grantlng.of
this W8l1Y~r could have on yO\lr property. All property owners 3djaoent to the aubje<:t property
wID receIv.. . notice of the Board of Zonlng Appeals hearing I at which iney may pl'888nt their
VIews. Your eignature Is TGquJred only to verlfy that yQU hive been toklllbout 1M request end \
glv.. the .d1~nt property owner opportunJty to comment.
, . (Commenta caneontaln languag. of .'....ln9 with the proj-=t, objecting to the prvJeot or I
other _temen.- regarding the projec:t.) ,
.--- '"b
Print Name . V~,~ ~ "'r.c.."- "
, -
Comment Jl~ ,
Si~ntdufe ~~::b-:~4- "- Address ~~1l.c10 Q'1ec.cl~~tJ I\;ve W ~,o
Print Name
Comment -
SI8f18ture A<ldress
Prfnt Name -. T
Comment
.
"
,
....
Signature' "., .
. .. Add.....
,
.. , . ,
,.'1
Print fqme .. ...,
" "
Comment .
.. ...
. - -
Slgnattn Addre.. .,
.,
.
.
.
e 17245880315
M.Eo SIEVERT CO.
l~'
POI
HSf1.1 PAGf 03
r('i:~:"":-"~~,; ,.:i::.;;';1~~iii-;lc9d to obtain the signatures of, all adiacent property owners. ,This includes "
~. : ," . " ! ";f;l~~ ri!: !.Mlng the applicant's property and directly across the street If on a corner, this
; ;1'ifr;:~~i~l ::!CfCiSS hr.J1h streets.
"; I '.. I 'I, 1 <
hI',: 12'J5'J 14
, " I I.::G~::NI..ER.OPE.RTY OWNERS: This petition Is application for waiver of
,I; '. "'J'~ ,; ~I'~ City Zoning Code, Plee$e be aw~re of any possible effect the granting of
.' ,t': .}..,:",,'?f ;:;'.:;.u:3 !'I<lve on YlJur property. All property owner~ 'JdjaCAnt to the subject prop.,rty
\, will J'CGeiv~ ::l ndice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
,\,IfC\\I"~', Your si~ln<:\ture i$ required only to verify that you havo been told about the reque$t and
I Dive;. thE' Adji:i(;~:,nt property owner opportunity to comment.
\
! (GtF';'I::-jjanU', ':;~il' contain language of .greelng with the project. objecting to the project or
; ~.liJ 1<1/11' Su.tel1'IEH1ts r.garding the proJect.)
!
M~E. SIEVERi' CO.
6960 Madison Ave. W.
MhmeapoU_. MN :55421
Ph.n. &12 $&4.1111
. , :' I~ I : , :'T".',~
.. //It> c> 13 J~ <:- r, c}./,
.. . ";'i, j :.' " l.
....
I , :::;--"'.' ,..
! (;'1"'1'1'."" "...... J11
i ~ , Hq:;f~"f~ r:'. /../.''.(-'..
AddrsSl
. I ;,l.:i~'ne___........__._
":"1"'-"":' "1\1
...._~..._.... .".. ..-------- ..-_..._~...~.
,..-............ . . .---_... ....
J'. '";':.'" ~ I ;:;.
Address
. . \,1 ~. " lh:':~
I
i.,
J I ,,',':o!Y1! ;':- ;';'1'1 ....."" ......."......
.:: . ::: ; ;~! : " .t .r:."
_. _."_ Address
-........-
; "j: "':,l.1.'"
i
IC,1r:"lfi;(;;lli .__......_.."_.
--.....
:":;~ .: it'!;; ti ~ I" !:'
.._ Addres~ _... .......
_" .~--O
1}1
I ;'1: ' ~:
REC~lVEti YRO~:b127?~591~
p. 9~1
JUL-Ol-02 09:03AM FROM-^ERO~IX SYSTEMS
.
.
763 746 8408
T-Ol1 P.002/002 F-444
HQTE TO AQ.JACEt,lT PROPEBTV OWNERS: This petitiQtl is application for waiver of
. Ordinance(s) of th, City Zo.nin9 Code. Plesfjle be aware of any pO$sib!e' effect the granting of
. this waiver could have on your property. All property owners 3dJacent to the subjeQt property
. wUI rec:eiv, a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing. at which th~y may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the reque$t and
gives theadj~ property owner opportunity to comment. : .
. .
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the prcJect. objecting tci the projeot or
other statements ...,_n:ting the project) .
.
/ AE~W1 tX
, ~
~: Add-. 7\ ~ ~ A1nt~~. ~
G.\ \J4C ~II, MtJ
"'-l S541.-'
Print Name_. 'Pa.\-e..- f.=,fp~~
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
....
Print Name",,-
Comment
Signature ....
.,,\
Print Name
Comment
Signature
A/L".
....
Ac;tdress ..:....
-..
Address
f' ----,..
J.-
_ Address '.
'..
.,.
I...... I 1\..'.... ...1 ,
.
.
.
07/01/2002 07:15 7538479019 VEl PAGE 01
~~ll:::;;;e wi. =:W~takllhe s~nalUr8s ~:.-~jaCentProper\y crMIlIrS; Th::"':.
I ell propertiel abutting the IPplicanf, property and directly Icrop the street. If on a comer, this
m..n. actO" both *"18.
riPI! :tQ &D.,JACENl: f'ROf.ERTY OyiM!RS: This petition i$ .pptic:atJon for waiver of
Ordinance(a) of th, Chy Z~nfng Code. PIe.,e be aware of any po"a;'e effect ,he oranting of
this waIVer could have on your property. All property owners Jdjacent to the eubject property
. wfll receive I notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they fT'NIy pr.-ent their
views. Your signature's required only to verify that you have been told .bout the request end
giv.. the 8dj.~ property owner opportunity to comment '
(Comments can contain t.nguaGe of ."r..lng with the proj,ct. obJ~tlng to .... project or
ether etatemenCS ,e,.rdlng .... proJ.ct.)
Print Name
Comment
J .d
L~6~T ~~~
_ ftP'"
S~natwe ~~'
~dreu ~tf:a ~,M;:;~a~
Print Name
Comment
Signet,ure ......-
........
Addre..
Print Name
Comment
Signature ;'
Addr..
Print Nama
--
Comment
- .. r J:..
Signature
Addr...
OJ/C)I'.....j''l'' II.!I"'II "1,t.J",,",""'''''~('1 .
rm!{,:\~:,. JUL 01 '02 02:29PI'1 ~TIVAR INC 941 4781 H:-:iJ.JM ,p.2iE 03
~:. The applicant wi. ~ to obtain the signatures ofall aQJacentpr~ owners. This Includes
all prope~s'abutting the applicant's property and directty across the street. If on a comer. this
means across both streets. '
.
~OTE TO ADJ.6CENT pROeER'N O~EBS: This petition is application for: waiver of
, Ordinance(s) of the City Z~ning ~ode. Plea~e be aware of'rttJ possibl,e' effect the granting of
this waiver could have' on your property. An property owners sdjacent to the subject property
, will receive a notice of the Board 01 Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjac~nt property owner opportunity to comment. "
(Comnlems can contain language of agreeing with the project,' objecting to the project or
other statements reg.rdlng the project.) ,
r'
Print Nam~ .4cTI fJ 14- J1-,. p~() H::/<- T J ~S
Comment W~ W(:?<.It,J L J K:....()
. ........
)lpC. .
"'~~
pJ2..eS I 0..4-7
lOt. dr' C hClitPf'& qn:r=
:J
Address -:' / l/'/) A4d..dll LJ/L/ J1..v.p {.d!:tf
eOt.r/..eN .1/(f)I(oRr/ ~
Print Name
....4
Comment
. Signature
Print Name_
Comment
Signature ~:~' ,
Print Name
Comment
Signature
AQdress
Address
Address
.
. .
'. ......\.... . J. . ....
;':. 1\'-; .,~} :.,;; , .'.,J";~;::::';>~\l~':~:':~"';':::(:;"~"'~';;;{':' -::':'\:\::\i.:~:.:'~.::~; ~:: -'. ';::':,: :;~:\;~.; .>:.'.:;-:;:'.: :;:."^" ;'.;;" .,:> .' .' .
.
." ,. "............. ...... .... _...... _ .. ..; .. ... _ '" _ _ _ _ _'_.-. _ _ .. _ ... .. .. ~ 'r...... _ _... _'.. _ _... _... _ _.... _ .. _ .. .. ... ..'....................... ... _......... ...... ..... _'_ ... _. _..... ... .... v...... '....... _ ..... ., _ ,_ ri .. ....1. ... ~.
'". 07/131/2002 15:22 612n95914
~,.~~:~..r.,~i~,':..i...~.\ I".. ~
~ ."_..._.,,...__."::"'~~'I<lIlali~"'-~~"''I'""_.'''''''''''--'''---"-"''''..''' ~ i ",.,..,.__...._..._........"..vI.....~_.......__""..._---___...""'.."_......,~;;.."'llauIil_.;..~~'H.":~"....,..
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This inc'\Jde~
all ptopertiesabutling the applicant's pro~erty and directly across the street. If 011 a cotner, t'hi~
means across both $treets. .
.
.
HS,DM
F'i':\GE U':-:
t~tC:)I.E..J.QApJACf;.N.l eROPJ.;RlY OWNERS.: This petition is application for waiver Qf
. Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Plea~e be awafe of any pO~$ible' effect th(J granting 'of
. this Waiv~.. could have on your property. All prOptHty owners ')djaoent to the subject propel.t~'
. will receiV$ a m)tice of the Board of Zoning Appeala hearing, at which they may pre$entthfF.~k
vIews. Your signature fs required only to verify that you have been told about the request ~~nrf
gives the adja:c~tnt property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments oan contain language of agreeing with the projec~ objecting to' the proJe:(l,t OJ
other statements regarding the projeot.)
F>rlntN"n'lEl~J?_~__.___~_._~__"_
GClinrnent
_1".........,.._~.....~.ao.I,._.......,.._............___..........._........ ,....._.~...._....__~.~..__......,.....__,....,_~...',."..........-_....._.......'....-......r....~--....-..,...........................;.....,"~.~. "-.-.~".........,.,...""""""......,'",....-.
Signature ~~J:_~~.~d~~~~
Print Narn$. (%g..lit~".."....~,';)i.~ b €,!?"......_ Vo'" ..."'...____...._"'....._.,.....~...."._,~.~"~......".._".,.,."".
Comment
1IIN.lllIlhll'lli.W:'I/I"...._..~.......It...""".._"""J...<'I"'.""....'I.""""'It-...''''''''''''o\ol'''''W;:'O......."""'~".......,~"'",...._""""""""''\IIlA.~..l>O.#'.,'',.,~''I',.\I'''"....~..,r'........._....oIlWIfl1I_.'''_,_"'_"'_"__"_'""__":"""""~"",__"-___,""",,,,,",-,,.,.....
. --C.---..----.....---~~ .
Signature ~3J;;I)-;~~~~-~--;-~--;;;-
. S u..." T '" .3........... .~"'..............:'~h.'.'..
Print Name
_.'"'~~w......,,'''''"''......y~.........'''.'..'"'''......,.,''''.~.'........,............\-_.........._._........'___,_~_ .b.l>..
--.,.-..-..,......._, <I'I'I,t. _ """""......"tI_""""~'IIIIW'IIIl.IIIo"alW.o\iIIIlo...............,"...
. Cornrnent
~.""".......W.~_'OfI..."""'....".....,."............................._.."'..__.__....._...__ ____ ____..~.._,_.____JN..........._. __., An. "'. ."........___".................'"....."".....
. .. y. -......-..-.,..-.. .." ~......... -,...._--'"""............. ~..~......_.. ..___.,...,_...~...~<<...........~.~...~~JY ""'_." .. _....~......"'''''''''''''.'''.~'\.''''''.......~
Signature"" . ~--"_...-._--_.
....._..............._..__.._---... Address
..,....~~........_.......__...,___ _''t'
... _arLM .......ll.__._,.-....-...._._............,.~..oIo.~~,.~..I.'#II............
'.
Print Name . . ,
---_...._...._.~.__...................~......,..,.._....-...._.._""..._._..__...<..._......_-----......._...,......_.,,--_..........,~...---............._...
Comment ,-~-~_."'~._-
~...~_.....d........,.,~ .-,,_......""'....~..,............"'.'I\I'_...,...,.......llI-......__,_...__,__...,...."... N'..... .......""'fl...__".........,.........""'..lill............,.,..."'~""".,~ .".....,...................-.-__......_......,.._......_.."_,...
....."'III"---."._<-....._w;_....__.._..or>....~iI
IIlIIII "'".,~......",................"_____. ....:/'oo."^"".' ,...,..,.~WY~~o\""'---""...............................-._'w-_......--......_.....-.-;...;u~~~.......
Signature
. .._."",.,__ Address
............. .,...."-.-.,..;.........-.-.--.."...............i>-
__..,~...................... ,,__ ... ~.._............III.,....Lj" .....ilftl,.......-................_...._,.,......~......."..
I~":IIII
., .... -...
'7":'
" ,
t.:.
'11
I
I
? roo? j''''''FF'M
PARAW\I'~'T 0 "AROW I NDS
No 0965
p 1
:..1
!:
.. ' L <- (, ,.;.) , , t v) I~ :) V , " I 'I,.I --'
The aoobnf win need to octaln tie eignaturea of all a~]8centprop.tty ownel1l~ ~",jnclucf8..
a" pro~. *buttlt'\G the apftficanfl property end directly IcrOSS theltreet., If em a ccmet,ttns
rne.n. acre.. both.n.ts. ! " . ",' ,,", ,," -', ..." ,.. ," ",-,1"'""<,",,,,,",,,,'''1 "~t.,,,,I~~~'. * .
.
HOlE IP AQJA.CeWf PROPERTY QYVNERS: This petiti~ II IpPucatlon for waiver of
Ordinance(l) of '" City Zoning Code. Pie.." be aware of any pOs.ib~e' effect the gtanting Of
. thle w.lv~r could have on your property. All J:)ruperty owners ~djlSlcent to the eubJect property
will ,.ce~ . notice of the B".rrl of Zoning Appear. hearing, at which they may pr..nt their
views. Your 8J;nature is required only to VOl"lfy that you h.ve been tokf about ~ requeet and
gives the ad~nt property owner opportunity to comment.
(Commentl Gan contllin language of 88ree1n; with u.. project,' objecting to' the project or
other ..tem.". regardlne ~. proJut.) ,
""... ~rJ.~l N~ . "'T~~ G,,~~ ,'...
, ,.. .._........_~.--'"..,~,.,.... ,.
Comment ~: . ~~~~~-.~T'1)J-.J:-.'
Signature ~-ft ~. Add~8 Y1b7v ~Mi ~
~,~ ~ \\, \t...
Print Name w lA,ol)~~'~. v~~:'N\~' '''''''' '
Comment
-
-
.-...------..-... - ~!.__...
SlgnltUr. -
Addlwt
. ..,
Print Name
Comment
-
Slgnlture ' ~, ' . " Addres8
.
, ,
. ."
Print Hem. .. .. .,
.'
TT
ComrNnt .
, . ,
..
,.
Slg~.tu... _ ' Add.... "
.....
..
"
....,'1"".
\..:...1.-,......;1,1
.
i "
.
. , . ~ l,\1.~~~l~
~
Jul 02 02 10:42a Crai~ Brenner
e7/e~/28a2 10:40 612i~95914 HSDM
~.,'1'~;Y' The applicant wID need'" obtain the' $ignatures Of an acl/acanl'properly _, This ,inclUdeS
'/ an properties abutting the appracant's property and directly across the street. If on a camer, this
means across both st:reet&. .
7635959152
p. 1
p~ e3
.
NOTE '(Q AD.J~CENT PROPERTY OWNt;BS: This p"tition is application for. ~ver of
. Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possib~ effect the granting 'of
. this waiver could ha'll! on your property. All property owners 3djacent to the subject property
, win receh;~ a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeats hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your slgna1ure is required only to lJertfy that you have been told about 1I1e request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. ; .
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project; objecting to the project or
ott:ler statemen. regarding the project.) .
Print Name
Comment
~ . 13
~~I J--eIJAet-
Slgnature~~-
<--- .
Print Name
Comment
Address ~9t'O /)f4;/~ A,~ tJ-#(:,
Signature
Addreu
. Print Name_
Comment
Signature .",
Address
Print Name
Comment
Sig~ature
Address
.
P.Ol
Jul-02-02 11:59A Ol'<:/"";;J':lJ.'i HSl)lIl PA$E 83
;,p.""/" ".. ";;':";pl;';;': wiD """d to obtain thestgnatures of .hdjacenl'property owners. this Inciu<le$
I. all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly acrOS$ the street If on a corner. this
means across both streets.
.
NOTe TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petltio~ is application for waiver of
Ordlnance(s) of the City Zoning Code. P&e.~e be aware of any pos.ible effect the granting of
thia waiver could ha"e Qn YOUI' property. All property owners ':ldjacent to the subjeQ property
will receiVe a notice of the BSllrd of Zon~ng Appeais hearlng/ at which they may present their
vteww. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comm.nts can contain I.n;uage of ."....inSiJ with the project" objecting to the project or
other atiatem.n. ,.sanSing the projeet.)
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Nlme__..
Comment
. Slgnlture
Print Name
Comment
Sign_1Q ".
Print Name ..
Comment
Signature __"'__
~,-< '," < sL
'-...~ \~ '---e...
Address ", ~ ~ Sa- ~'\ (. ..e~~ ~..... ". S,-t:'::.
Cc.....' &,y t> -_. \../ <_" \ "', \;
LJ
...--
A(1dress
.......
Address __.m
Address _
.
.
PETITION FOR ORDIANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN V ALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
ATTACHMENT TO PETITION FOR 7100 MADISON AVENUE WEST
ITEM 9
Hearing and Service Dogs of Minnesota is dedicated to helping Minnesotans who are deaf
hard-of -hearing or disabled to become more independent and self confident by pairing the]
with specially trained assistance dogs. The program carefully selects homeless dogs, often
from local animal shelters, and trains them during a training period that lasts four months
for Hearing Dogs and six months or more for Service Dogs. The dog, professional training
and interpreting services, obedience instruction, medical care, food and supplies are given
to qualified applicants at no charge.
The dogs reside at our training facility for approximately six months. They receive
intensive training on campus and in general public settings like restaurants, shopping
centers and conveyances.
.
While the dogs live with us, they live in an indoor kennel. The purpose of the
variance is to allow us to extend the indoor kennels into an outdoor exercise kennel
of approximately four feet by ten feet for each dog. The kennel area will include a
roof overhang to shed the elements.
The indoor/outdoor run accommodation is critical to the operation of our business.
The dogs all remain completely housebroken while they are with us and are taught to
only "go potty" when outside. We would use these outdoor runs as exercise and
potty areas while the indoor runs are being cleaned, morning and night, and while the
dog's food is being prepared and served in their indoor run.
The dogs would be outside for relatively short periods of time and only when staff is
present to supervise them. Barking is strongly discouraged as part of our training
process. Feces are removed immediately and pavement areas are regularly washed.
The dogs will never be permitted outside without a staff person in the vicinity and
will not have the ability to go outside at will.
The design of the structure is very suitable for our needs, but there is no place, other
than the areas designated in this variance request, where the outdoor runs can attach
. to the building and give us suitable interior space for kennels.
.
S\
~
ff:t
.(t)
~
t;
't
~
E
j
"'-
...c:--
.
\
~
-
\.... ~
~~
~
-c. \)-
~ ~~-
'^ 1<-
$:;. ~
~
V\
""""'-
-
~U\
~ ~
~ls.
.
'\
Ii;
I f)o.
,<2
- ......
"'t-b
'1=~
C1\
~
V\
---f
~
~
t'-
r
~
1't
~
~
~
~
~
t::>
"-
'""
~
<..
))
~
t:
.
~~
~ '=>
~ 0\
't ~
'1' .......
~
~~
()
~
~
.
.....;...
.
.'e;\"!..'
.
I .
~ ~-i~)
\lJ
-~.
."
, ( c..p..;>-~
. ~(l..I"Nt't..,
....;.;l, )
"-- ~(J. r-...\nlf0\. .I~I
_MM._-"-
"'2..0' ,..z..6'
. i "j..(
""y
\ <; r::-oL.- rut~.
"?&'
, '
\
_ ._!II~I1~ /'~(?~i-f:
vff1~ ;~~..f-
... I
~~"\vW&.r.
1,1l70.t;;p
i
I.
I
i
I
4
101
'1
\
~Cf-...~ ~.~
~ tl'....~~O"O'1 .
....:.
'\'".
~
.t.
.1
. .
I
..
-~-
, ...
ffl~Nb ~
~IL.~ 2t&Ol1,<7o--11?
~~~~~~;t...~
'~I~)b pP-v-/ '2. t. '
'j\~>. .., . . f .
:~i:;,.
..!f.
.~~::
;.g,
;:~~
.~
-~;
';ft:
.,t...._- ~~.
~.
.,
-:~
.r.';
,'<:~
"~
;-~f
:;J~:'
/jJ
.:j:
l.
]i! '
,ii.
.
.
.
Board of Zoning Appeals
Page 5
May 10, 1983
lot 15, Block I, Golden Valley Estates
Hennepi n County, Mi nnesota.
W S, all persons present were given the opport
to be hear, OW THEREFORE
BE IT RESOl V by the
City of Golden Valley t the following
3A.06(3) is hereby grant
. the adoption of the foregoing resolution w
by Herb Po1ac and upon vote being taken thereon the following d in
favor the : carried unanimously and the following voted against th
none. ereupon said resolution was declared dUly passed and adopted,
by e Chariman and his signature attested by the Secretary.
83-5-9 (Map 14) Indu stri a1
lot 12 and those parts of 10 and 11 1y i ng Northerly of the Westerly
Extension of the North line of lot 9, All in Block 1, Advertising
Creative Center and lot 13, Block 1, Advertising Creative Center
7100 Madison Avenue West and
7105 Medicine lake Road (the proposal includes the two properties
to be combined as one parcel)
Michael B. Pierce and Jerry Baskfie1d
The Petition is for waiver of Sections
1.03
(lot of record) to provide for two structures on
one parcel of land,
and waiver of Section
7.05(3)c
rear setback for 7105 Medicine lake Road Bldg.
for 9.8 feet off the required 20 feet setback
to a distance of 10.4 feet from the lot line to the
the proposed addition to the rear of 7105 Medicine
lake Road.
For waiver of Section
7.05(3)d
landscape for 40 feet off the required 50 feet
of landscape along the west lot line of 7105
Medicine lake Road to a landscape area of 10
feet in width (50 feet required because it abuts
a residential zoning).
Board of Zoning Appeals
Page 6
May 1 0 , 1983
.
For waiver of Section
7.05(3)d
landscape for 10 feet off the required 10 feet
green area, at the north lot line of 7100
Madison Avenue to a green area of 0 feet as it
now exi sts as black top park ing area.
For waiver of Section
7.05(3)d
landscape for 10 feet off the required 10 feet
of landscape along the west lot line of 7100
Madison Avenue to a landscape Area of 0 feet
as it now exists as blacktop driveway and
park ing area.
.
Total parking required for both sites is 99 spaces.
Total provided is 99 spaces.
The petition was in order. Consent had been obtained from adjacent properties
except for Lucille M. Gregerson, the adjacent property owner abutting the west
lot line of 7105 Medicine Lake Road. Ms. Gregerson resides at 7125 Medicine
Lake Road and her property is zoned residential. Ms. Gregerson was present
a t the meeti ng.
Mr. Michael B. Pierce, owner of 7105 Medicine Lake Road, was present and with
him was his architect, Mr. Charles Novak. Mr. Pierce exlained he had an
option to purchase 7100 Madison Avenue Building subject to approval of the
w ai vers proposed.
.
He described his present business, explained that it has been very successful
and that he needed the additional room that he has proposed to add to his
building at 7105 Medicine Lake Road. He said if he purchased the Madison
Avenue property, it woul d be used as an investment property. However, he
later explained it could be used in part for some tool room storage for his
own facil ity. For manufacturing processes and continuity, it was best to
house all production facilities in one building.
The architect described the two levels of the proposed addition to the rear
of the Medicine Lake Building. He also reviewed the drainage on both sites
and surrounding property and said if the waivers were approved, they would
correct the storm water drainage problems and clean up the sites.
Mahlon Swedberg expressed his concerns about eventually havi ng this lower level
garage door area being used as a loading dock with the Madison Avenue property
to the rear provi di ng access for truck s to the door of the Medici ne Lake Road
Building.
Mr. Pi erce sai d hi s intent woul d be a door approxi ma te ly 8 feet by 8 feet and
pr.obably use the area to store his boat. Mr. Pierce said he doesn't use or
need all the parking that he is required by ordinance to have.
Board of Zoning Appeals
Page 7
May 10, 1983
.
Glen Christiansen said the buildings have to stand on their own and that owners
and occupants change and the purpos~ of the Zoning Code is to insure they can
meet adequate parking, setbacks, etc., no matter who is the owner or occupant.
Art Flannagan said it appears to him to be a proposed over-utilization of the
site and while it is desirable to see a successful business, it cannot be to
the detri ment of the ci ty and its codes.
Herb Polachek said his best description of what could happen is the same
situation that occurred on Lilac Drive when Flower City took over a previous
,church administration building and created parking problems because they had
different requirements.
.
Mah10n Swedberg said he feels the proposal is not in the best interest of
Golden Valley and it goes beyond what is prudent development for both existing
sites and is contrary to the intent and good usage of the surrounding property
when the IICreative Industrial Parkll was platted.
Ms. Gregerson spoke an~ said the rentention of the required 50 feet of green
area adjacent to her house was essential to her. She said when the original
building was built she approved of it based on the requirement by the Board of
Zoning Appeal that the 50 feet of green be there as the code requires. She '
noted she has had offers to sell her home as it is the only residential parcel
The Board noted what considerations constitute hardship.
Mike Sell described how he saw the two properties could be used and speculated
that the two owners could agree to cross over the Madison Avenue property and
use a lower level of the Medicine Lake Road Building.
The proposed addition would require waivers, however, and no lower level could
be constructed without Board of Zoning Appeals approval.
Art Flannagan moved to deny the waivers as requested. Second by Glen Christiansen.
Mah10n Swedberg called for further discussion. There being no further comments,
Swedberg called the vote and it was unanimous to deny the waivers as requested.
The Board informed Mr. Pierce of the appeal process to the City Council that is
available.
Swedberg reviewed several administrative matter oard. He
exp1aine mationa1 materials he om Mayor Thorsen and the
Board completed the, orms may be forwarded to the Mayor.
urther business to come be
to adjourn at 9:40 P.M.
ard, it was upon motion,
.
Mah10n Swedberg, Chai rman
Lloyd G. Becker, Secretary
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~.ci~Mm_vll~ Y
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
7-9-02
7100 Madison Avenue West
Alan Peters. Applicant
Alan Peters, of Hearing and Service Dogs of Minnesota, with property
located at7100 Madison Avenue West, has petitioned the Golden Valley
Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Industrial zoning district
(Section 11.36 of the City Code). The applicant is proposing to build a
dog kennel addition to the existing building. This kennel requires
variances from building setback requirements. In addition, a survey was
submitted for the property, and it was discovered that the existing
building does not meet building setback requirements. This construction
project requires variances from the following sections of City Code.
. Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (A) Front Yard Setbacks. City Code
states that buildings shall be setback at least 35 feet from any
front yard property line. The requested variance is for .1 feet off
of the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.9 feet for the existing
building at it closest point to the front yard property line along
Madison Avenue West.
. Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code
states that the distance between any part of a structure and the
side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirement: In
the case of lots abutting another Industrial zoning district, the side
yard setback shall be 20 feet. The requested variances are for 5
feet off the required 20 feet to a distance of 15 feet at it closest
point to both the east and west side yard property lines for the
existing building; and for 15 feet off the required 20 feet to a
distance of 5 feet at it closest point to the east side yard property
line for the proposed dog kennel addition.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
"
.
4810 Lowry Terrace
02-7-42
.
Mary Condon Peters
.
.
.
.
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
Hey
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
4810 Lowry Terrace (Map 3) (02-7-42)
Mary Condon Peters, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
Mary Condon Peters, with property located at 4810 Lowry Terrace, is requesting variances
from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to
build a deck addition to the existing home. This addition conforms to the building setback
requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted
for the property and it was discovered that the existing home and detached garage do not
meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold
Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done
only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The
Hold Harmless form is attached.
. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback.
City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side
lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a
width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested
variance is for .6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.4 feet at it closest point to
the west side yard property line for the existing home.
The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory
Buildings. City Code states that a detached garage shall be at least 35 feet from any lot
line which is also a street line. The property owner is requesting a variance for the garage
to be located at a distance of 34.4 feet from the front yard property line along Orchard
Avenue North rather than the required 35 feet.
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in July of 1958 for the
construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
.
VI' ,'~
. __ ..... re'" .~- 114.'~ ~
S9..SP " /11-7.,1',,7 .- :.'1 ....J.
Ii. . t;1~J.~
Q \.,
I
. - 147.8.3 _ J -l:>.
I
. -.,..~
~ 0 ,:,
t O~~I
, - ~ I
I - "
'.. ()/ 8-" ~ .,'
I> _ I o it'
,... I~ :
o II
4 7 I!
/iI .0 . ~
III
<:l
.... .
1Z,5
,"'c
~ 6= _ 91. S' J"~
o 0 = I t
.. . II.S t.:
: .! ,I 10
I ~ ~U
_.a ;
3341 ~ I:_'_~
- "" '
3312 3316 3336 3340 3344.... .
if) ..... .... 85 1HL r
t . .,. ~. ........ ~ J" Jo ~
~ ~ ~ ~. '_ , C;; ~;: - I - I _ . _ N I\) = ;
()()",,- - (l)"" Q) co 0
(,o /"0 S .... ..... 85 _ l
..~
- 0 ~ - 5::
~_V') "'5 ~CD 't'D'~ ~ ~
. ~ ~.... (
6i> r ., 6<>, 8f ., "
3235 3301 3309 3313 4
'"
o
o . ~
~I ~ Q N
o () .
(j) , b (h I> (
~ ~,~
t... ~ r7., 85.JZ 4
.. ~ 1> -
~I '" .t'~ Z _ _ 0 "(4:
~ r.- ()/ ~ '" .,..b rr1 &':;:> ~~ f'1 Ifi
~. .... . 0_ ~ ~ ~ I\) _ .,.":0 r.> .
10"
,,,.,
-;s,
.
a:~
= C'
~ 'rD"
~~
~ "'C
= "'l
=-~
~"Cl
= ttl
~:4.
ttl':=
~
ttl
"'l
Y'
...
00
""'"
>=
"Clt""'
"Cl ~
=~
S~
a~
ttl
"'l
"'l
=
n
ttl
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
Petition Number 0)-,- 'f ?-
Date Received 6' / 13 /02-
,
Amount Received so.oo
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
J/glO l..pwry Uffcne N. 6-Dldu-..\/cd {~ ~54Z2.
2. BZA Petition Date
3. Petitioner: M.a Yl1 Cone( ~ P ...eJ- ..e4'S .'
NameJ' ~
Ad~!:P lbw'j-lfA"lf.f j D CRyIState~PlJJss<(.
U,(2-- <?~ct. [oLIn J 7~3,S2.q .23 bl
Business Phone Home Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
toT I ) Blo~k- 1) Low{jTl'JYt<-Le.AJditJ~
+t.e-~Ul i' p~ ~ ~ I tv1 N
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: ~ingle Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial
Commercial
Institutional
Bus. & Prof. Office
Other
."
I-
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
E't,' /s,-tib, ' n .1'''^., '/'
12~_un& _ d ~ r1 tJ,1J.ftJ.~ ().
~' ~ \~S-tf ()
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
~vidence.ifapprOPriate. E)(h,t-I~~ \4.+ I ~p~
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear dista(lce of any buildings from the property line will be'needed.
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate IQcation of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. 'fthe survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 51).00 representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
.
.
.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project)
r
Print Name
Comment
Sfal1 w.JId^au~
.:1' AlW~ I1/) ~11 r~chlYr\ -It> '#tis {)nPrJsM ~
v , ,
Print Name \) OU5\o..5 f\l\u \1 et
Comment No O\oje..c...,or;Ofl"j
Signature ~ ~
Print Name J;t \ ~l:e t ( e... ~Ct
Address 32.1.\0 Ofch(A<,d f\ve. Noc.y),
Comment
Signature
.
.
.
Print Name
Comment
J"h\~ ~ ~ :r Yn ~)d ~
(2 ~j- ~ d ~
Signature r'O~, /(/. l' ~.
PrintNa~<S lVtLS~
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment:
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
L. Fo tl ows
Address 6~bO (9~~ ~I
3 ~v~. ..~ +0
C~--~OfL'L.' !
Address Lt'?? i) U ~ -r..e..lY'a/~
Address
Address
Address
Address
.
/r ,
-4 :/ ;/')
, 7; IL
Street Address
"HOLD HARMLESS'
I, III ~ C07vI;,jJf.L6 , am requesting the City of Golden
Valley to allo' me to proceed with a(n) "St'VI.a.(( at' ct onto
my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that
I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a
variance(s) for this nonconformity.
At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me
to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is
not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its
original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley.
/lilt! l'
Print Na
')1tel
Signatur
Iv .- J 3 - () d--
Date
;S--
.
City of Golden Valley
Staff Signature
.
.
.
.
f\
o
o
t"..
tv
(~) t/I' -.
(I) " I '
II \ d /I
\- ./
( ,
( ,
1V"'-""'V'-t.{
~
t N K L" rAJ al-d y:rd.:iJ.". <: -
"fJ.....
p.~K#~.0~'.
c' ~f:v1~. ~..
/ ptJt-- lYl }yttP ·
('r .j, pt. -'" "
I!> I ?'1>I.U"", j ,l(~' .J!;'->>"
I YO pa~./'" <\-':'J}{j6 ~
~----~;:-,t~..~.......~ "
r Jf.~'() ~
/' '2
I
fJ
\,
...
""'I
AJ
I-I
1'-'1 c S
\./ .'
je..<
\. yAfi
~'
'VA,
tr
I'
,
'-
'J..f>.+ -
I
\
I ",.;......~
~ / I.-
i2 r~' " ~\
I) .'
......--
i
iu-
'-t
,
it
,- ~-
17
\
\ \5
(l)
~ i &..i
~ '.', I ;. ri
'" 1 ......
-::~i - \
~ l'- !
~ \ lA'/( _\
~ IV'.' "I r't--~'\
~~~\ 4.8 ~: <~q~ - \> <-
-- """ ~-...,.. -..,. \..-'
+ . -- - -. ( 1 ' 'I .-
_ 1 .>^J' 4."
_ 'j' ';n-tt CC.!)
!t- {) '-'
\ ;.. "oV"'--D I ~ >r
\ t>
1 \
!
\~
l~
II
\
" \j
'~ i ...-'
--+-~
-::::c~:~~~~":-::7:::c:c:==:=:::::::::c::::::::-_c::-:-::==if:':'-:'::::-::::'c'::=':=::.:':C'::='
~
t.l.)
/
/
".~
" I.iI
" ./
'2 4 I ?,..
() Il...
~ {;,c!J) ,~ r'
/ f,7:l ,,,,t<.. -'-
J \J / ' l:::r-" . :.' - '\ >$'-
_ I ~ ,.,fl G {r-,",
I. 0 \\~rl
(l I ~ e:.L
N, - \
1 ~~!w \\
.\1, V'
F~ ,,,'(
1'1 I:! xy \ ~
~I \\1
"L(" '- ~ \ \". t
'.\ u
d
/
/:
.....'
-.,
.,'
:'\
l_:
01
tA-,'"
\,
\\
'~ \
~,
.c' /./
(.~~
v
\'
~)
,~:?:;;/
iD4-l't4-r
>'
.). ~ yj, /~
~~. ~/ \J
''-!~U.kL tg~Vj<J.)
La W Q. Y
T"E' k. R AC E.
elf
~
i
,
I
I
!
j
)
(:j
(po
.
(l lBVOICE FOR LAND SURVEYING SERVICES PERFORMED
~ ~ l/J
OWHER/OCCUPAn ~~ ~
ADDRESS . 11;0 . . .=~ no,. ..lAJ V~
LEGAL DESCRIPTX01l '-;i ~ (, 7fJI7 # I / ~ .~ f'LJ.
WO~.. . PROJ. ECT DETAIL~ (~SO SEE KE~CH I
~;.J w.. -,~ a-.4/
~) ~ LOCATE LOT CORNERS (NUMBER FOUND]
\lJ 'fJ- SET LOT CORNERS (NUMBER SET)
U) !-t-STAKE PROPERTY LINES FOR FENCE (WITH 1/2 INCH WOOD STAKES)
STAKE HOUSE AND/OR BUILDING CORNERS WITH ELEVATIONS
LOT SPLIT (TOWNHOUSES...ETC.)
BENCH LEVELS AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEYS...ETC.
.
BOUNDARY SURVEYS (METES AND BOUNDS)
~ESEARCH CITY, COUNTY OR STATE RECORDS
__INTERPRET AND/OR WRITE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
The charge for
& FINAL)
_ALTA/ACSM (AS-BUILT) SURVEYS
SUBDIVISION PLAT PREPARATION
Dai:e l~ III /~ z,
, I
Paid: Cash/Check
.
paymeni: is due upon
complei:ion of surveyor wii:hin i:en
Paid in full ~ fA ~
Thankyou, G
days.
.
Make Check oui: i:o:
Gary L. Backer,
6917 - 83rd Ave. No.
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota
55445
Tele: 612-425-6427
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
wwmd.goMm_vlt~ Y
7-9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
4810 Lowry Terrace
Mary Condon Peters, Applicant
Mary Condon Peters, with property located at 4810 Lowry Terrace, has
petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from
the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a deck
addition onto the rear of existing home. This proposed addition meets
building setback requirements. However, during the construction
planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was
discovered that the existing home and detached garage do not meet
building setback requirements. Below are the requested variances:
· Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback. City Code
states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or
structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following
requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100
feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested
variance is for .6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.4
feet at it closest point to the west side yard property line for the
existing home.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code
states that a detached garage shall be at least 35 feet from any
lot line which is also a street line. The property owner is
requesting a variance for the garage to be located at a distance of
34.4 feet from the front yard property line along Orchard Avenue
North rather than the required 35 feet.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
.
5801 Olson Memorial
Highway
02-7 -43
.
David Barton
.
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
5801 Olson Memorial Highway (Map 12) (02-7-43)
David Barton, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
David Barton, with property located at 5801 Olson Memorial Highway, is requesting a
variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached
the City to build a deck addition to the existing home. This addition conforms to the building
setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was
submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet
setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold Harmless"
form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after
the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold
Harmless form is attached.
. The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City
Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has
determined that the rear setback to be 25.7 feet from the property line to a structure. The
requested variance is for 5.8 feet off the required 25.7 feet to a distance of 19.9 feetat its
closest point to the rear yard property line for the existing attached garage.
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in October of 1954 for the
construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
Subject Property: 4801 Olson Memorial
Hwy
David Barton, Applicant
.
~
,.
..
.
.
"
~
I~
1;;1
~
:;
.:.,
~
.--
5.J~
56/
.
.
I
I
, " ;:..--
JL>l '::: I,:, ._ '"....,-"",
MEMORIAL H Y. ) \ I ,~~
I ..:1 ~~ I ot
I II ~ \ I .
li....h-~
"US -.u. Il, ',. ," .,r.=--
I '-<or------
__ ~.i.1:::..'"'-_ __ __"""""
- I .
o I
I
57SS.bll
$7$0
.
, ~
I:i
'"
,+
~
6125
~
~
11:
5".)1~ - -
3DI.9J
(P;r/ "f 18J5)
L ulh. /3ibll! In5/dull!
"7.18
10.
4 3 'Z
Ie . .
~700 5660 5620
4101 smAVE'561'
10.0
:;;
'"
"
"
~1.
/AfS'.S
11.
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
Petition Number 0 ~ - I - t.f]
Date Received ~ J J J I 0 ~
,
Amount Received 50, 00
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
5 f () I ()L ('0 IV Jv1&'ntJ~JAL 1../ Y
.. w
2. BZA Petition Date
3. Petitioner: OA (vi I.f) L ()~ /lrIJN
Name
Ir ~ tJ J CJ L!.r p N jYJ E'/1 /-1 Y
Address . Gity/StatelZip
1t:3~3:j-o/q ?3
Business Phone Home Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: ~ingle Family ~oUble Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office
. Other
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
i_ () e-A -1; ~ AI '-tf? P a A/f.J ~ ?
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed,
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 5o.~ representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
(J4<4-P ;t-()~
Signature of Applicant
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
)
,..
.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project)
Print Name GrtC.{ Be; /ke
Comment No (\ 10 j .{2 L .!-;, ~ k
Signature a~ IBd $
Print Name rtrk.L. /ltur(l b/DfVl
. Comment t0~ 'O.\a ""&-Jre r-..
/J
pd.Ai~'
Address 0' ;1,r- 0/ s"" V>i. ~'" /1,..1/"
Signature
Address 520 yo~.1c-- Itvc- tv.
Print Name ,,~bM(.J<; r OA..-'t t\ d (Fr
Comment tJo () 6---SC CT\O~
s~na~~-1i: ~ Address 51? yo~m~f\~ .1J
."" . ..._-~._,-'
Print Name
Comment
-r~ ff €/J .r tA) / C I;;
No 0 ^' k IJ. i1 h,,'C
Signature
Address ri~JS- Vn 5/EJ'1 /1t~ kv
.
.
.
S 9 6/ (!Ii Ji?" 1/ Ii/Yl J-/ Y
Street Address .
"HOLD HARMLESS'
I, ~ VI/J L t3A I( r IJ J.! I am requesting the City of Golden
Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) JOA Z I {) I'? E <:: I( onto
my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that
I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a
variance(s) for this nonconformity.
At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me
to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is
not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its
original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley.
.
/JA, ill/) L. 6A ~ ~ fit
Print Name
~.-j)4~
.,gnature
tIJa/{),;L
Date f
rjJ O/Y\ O~
City of Golden Valley
Staff Signature
.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR David Barton
5801 Olson Memorial Highway
Golden Valley, MN 55422
.
.
.
j
/ //";'/''''/(1 V
H/ 1..~7 /'IfIY'H __ ..
r------ --. OL5.~~Uk.;I~;:~jfP/J!L
JfHS;-tI/
S'? 'Me
~
~
'l-
"
~
~~'f3.'ftJ
\J
t
'II/'
r ~N.~
~ /Yd.'? J~
(....,1 .~)~,c~~I-6~$G'
'\. z.. S .t'9'o z. (.
Scale: 1" = 30'
o Denotr iron monument
xooo.o = Existing elevation
Bearings are assumed
" ,
X~9'~.6'?
1M IUJrfh 1';'fL 0 I Cb'; I ~T 3
- / ;lB. ?t:1- .589'%::'" '<~'('//E -
Y;:::6~7\ Ct!JNI"4E/,f; W/llr<
,"'.
Il>I
--l:
"-
'-\.
'"
~
Il<:>
~.
.....~
'\..,..
'~'1
~-,j
'It"J.
" '"
-~ 1\
'1>~
~ "l
.lI;:.....
..::: ~
~~
~~
"
~,
)''''l
I A~I:I::: IZI890 s~;f,-I ~:
I
I
I
I
~',,",
. ~. ~
~: .~,
1-: 1;,'
~' t,,'
.... 'I~,:.
.' , . ;., '\.,
, '1' 7.{..>< ,~;
.d .". ....- ,lI::'
f'l1 '2.q' ..(V,:
I N':'~ ':
I 04A116E~ : ~ '
1 ,>,11,
"
~
<>Ii.....
~~~
",~"".
~" ~'
~ ~;.')~
~ :f~~
'1o~N)
~ ".....
, .1!~J
S) ,~-\.
t'\ "'t-......::.
:x "'1\<1
~ ~~\3
~ ,,\l~
" ~ ~ ,
\
~
~,
~
~
~
,
~
~
~
"
I
/6 .~
La
C'17.~X
./
20
NO, j-80 I
(~
2.0 "I L__
/
~
/.
2.1./
T,11113./7.? af'c..I<
,([if' 7, "/
....
X 1i'9'9. 7
7'1C-1'" tiN Q CK<-'
(#;rI~,.<Je:;l.. ,
]2
,.vb. fZo
t1#t: ST,Rtj
8~/~ t(J,tJ, I
ltptl5E
the east 128.90 feet of the west
of Government Lot 3 lying south
..>
Legal Description:
~he north 100.00 feet of
317.8D feet of that part
of State Highway No. 55.
Benchmark: TNH at 500 Yosemite Ave. No.
N.G.V.D. 1929 adjusted elevation = 896.780 ~eet.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation
of a survey of the bopndaries of the above described land and of
the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible
encroachments, if any, from or on said land.
As surveyed by me th~s 1st Day of J~ 2002.
~/t ~~
Herb F. Lem1re R
Minnesota Reg. NO. 13349
4416 Abbott Ave. N
Robbinsdale, MN 55422
Phone: 763.537-0497
I
.
.
.
.
www.ri.goUm_vll~ Y
7 -9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
5801 Olson Memorial Highway
David Barton. Applicant
David Barton, with property located at 5801 Olson Memorial Highway,
has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance
from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to
construct a deck addition to the existing home. This addition meets
building setback requirements. However, a survey was submitted for
this proposal and it was discovered that the existing attached garage
does not meet building setback requirements. This construction project
requires a variance from the following section of City Code.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states
the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth.
Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 25.7 feet from
the property line to a structure. The requested variance is for 5.8
feet off the required 25.7 feet to a distance of 19.9 feet at its
closest point to the rear yard property line for the existing attached
garage.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
it
,
.
4915 Dona Lane
02-7-44
.
Greg Wiley
.
.
.
.
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax)
Hey
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
4915 Dona Lane (Map 4) (02-7-44)
Greg Wiley, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
Greg Wiley, with property located at 4915 Dona Lane, is requesting a variance from the
Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a
deck and gazebo addition to the existing home. This addition conforms to the building
setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was
submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet
setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold Harmless"
form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after
the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold
Harmless form is attached.
. The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City
Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line.
The variance requested is for 2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 33 feet at its
closest point to the front property line along Dona Lane for the existing home.
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in January of 1956 for the
construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
.
.
Subject Property: 4915 Dona Lane
Greg Wiley, Applicant
'+ .":)i,.jf:!~' /.l." ~-~.z,.~ '-\, /~ I. ~ ~ . ~ 1 ;.~ '" -~\..r.. ~I ...."\ -... -- - I ' I ~ "\ I '5.:aL.1.
...~. ~ rL~: ~ '"'l': '0 IIS.I% ,t 1& '~';%' - T:
;;~-';.~;"O'~f<~\,~." ". %O,?/$/,~'(,,;; ~ml' -h~~l~/~ 'O,S~. ~ ~~_~~____ _____~~_~~ ~~_~-~o-j--t~ r! ELM DALE \ 0:1.';"
~ ~~ " '., ,. '. ~. ~. !.. .. .~, .!~ I I "~'" ,1.ll
"~q,,~ ~.h~\ <-, ',' "w:~~;,;.~o\~ S' :......~t ';\ 8 !! 7 'o! f, ~ " ~[3- 4 t;:I ~~ I' ~I" 4 ~ ~I;I :,;;i.to 'f4 : "", f'1.O;
.' ~~. ..'~ I. ' ','s"'-'-' ., '. ~ .., 10;;\; , "':",." J IK"'-':' ,..._,_u_ u.,_..... !> _.,-__J.___... <'*\0:1 ~;;i.'IL.' · 0<4.< ~
l S>O ". /1i/ ~ 'tr .., , ." ;;. I . ~ '.~'~.D 14900 C ~ ~ ~ t\j .. =: ~ .. I ~:I. is.<K"':'
' .:t:~~'.(r, ~~, ~;'.4 } S~ O~ ;.r~"'~ : ~~. to. ...1.....~\'N "\S~',2?"'i,. ~:, ~'~__~ m_~.,~~ ~ ~_.~~__~ _ __,. ~ tl~' ~~. 13" ~ Z.y' :
~..."" -.:;! ,00 '" ~ . 'tj. 6' 49 t'" "J:~'."; ". :T,ili:~ ~ IG~' .. I:~ c-.~ ~ 15 I 148.1 "5.6S.~ 01):
,w:- " '6 ,...",0,... S.. ......;.004. '%H;'~ \ . \1.".:.:-6 I ..l?0) ;--'II-'~ _ I' 'I) _ -. I I I ,,"..~'
. 'f ., I ". 1'14 -, . a "i'15' ...~ ...t\j 1'1 " -... -,., "I ~ l_i .,Z .
; 15/- ~~:iol~~'~!;~~~';:1"Il'l\ ~~~~:~ !!":~--,:!~-:~ ~~..~~~_~__m~_._~~ ~~-.~;--~~ M=' '3"1 ,:.,.':.:
~....zQQ,&. ". ,L. ~IIOA" . " . .1L~:;;; 10 ~ u--t.----NIS "---,--- ----~----- ---<;:-- 1'1: i ~ . II -:: 4. J.~-:
~ '____!-"_lu~ ~-, ..--... \jI-;'\.. ;<--J-..!'I"'". ~ . .. 0 I:! S ,-~;:l .. '<A'
14 .0,'7 ..~'#.ot<t. ",_ ~.''II.''.'2' ~ ", ~ ;' 15 . "'0:' 1 ,,~t!l~. 2S . ..
'-!1!.5___~'\\J"SI4t__";;:"~~'~"'~--"i'! ~-' ;;<"$l9:---":'.L"'~\(:~'--"--~--~--~~,,,_ . ~w::,~..'O ::125.~~<I;~
I~~rb",-,--t:.:- \\'~_~-:: 8 ':~ = '..?::. ,\'1'''''' .el~t!_'4 ~ ,.~ (.)' 14 ,., $::>'" 125 ',,,, ",::l,..
~ '-- -.~ I ":~-"1~ ,~.,~- -:>.::' - .'~~ff"'---'!11n- 41'. 0:,. -:"'Z · J
-~ JI1~- - ~'O\.~ ~ 1I'" -' ~ n ,... . ~I~'. , ....,_~
~~ 11 ,.., \ ",-:1 ~"h \ - . 7 ..". -:'~8 ~;,~:. 5. .:-~:<. 13 l' 10. ~'1t;! .'3 ,'~ ;e ~>~.. 12S" IA"O"~ ~
~--:.~~., . ~ So ~~. r .n' . '" ,.... l' . ~ 'n. "" '" " , '''_ l"'c;t,I--.
---- '- ~\,\...---- ..- .-.~'-' ., ~i'lt.....,., -- '" I ~ &~ . ~~; I ~~,~ 8 7 ...
~ II '0. '--'\-- ....'~'k".' .-...:..-,,;!;.;: ,.~"" ",,'. Z:; II. <>,~"'.'Z :-" II~.... lll'lr-"p,' ! ,.
· "-. ~( . .!~ I ~"'Ii,.., , '...' . .... .. ,.,. .,~ ....,,, . ..... .' '."" ,,;' . "~\.. '"." ,~, . ,
~t~0:03:~7 $:27 ":/$ .~OO, Tl:~ 7~~L~ R '92~ ~e~A[L.I~.'901 ~~'7'~~4"f<" '::~~"'~7.7' ~~$; .i~.I_;'-_ 0 '"
JL - ~".'l 78....1 80 . '3" ".'l',l.~~ "'~Uj ~ ~ 87 .'0. .'0. .'00 100" '..'S:!6-" 38 ~l::;: 1'32.3/.1 /32.3. ::; ,.
N N..ll ,'..!,' '. _ ."",,,_ '0 -r'lo.ll , N, ;; . -, ," , .. <&.1 1 .", "
c~:::,: ;e~ 1'1::> · " ~.~ i ~:; _ ..~ +.. '-..,
-; I" Z :c.j- ~ 4 ~ '" ; I t! t! 3 ~~, 4 ~ 5 ~ ,;:; 7 ~e.LOf./i5 0,0",11)' P.M~."I1~ · ;: ::r;::-=--W-'2---..111
O!So'" 7,2 "I~' 77'''1 '1 " 100 100 100 00 ..../.t:7.L..<iI..~ '\l... _z: ~ ....
- IOJ.lj IOJ.5 10t.'1 ~ 101 " I' IGZ S4 ~ ...... - _1'r4~~ - ... ~
i ~ g , 0 'S.,rS7'Zo.W. . . ...... .:::'.27.2" f 13Z,t$ ~ ~ S
~. -." N Z ~ 23. 4 ~ I ~ ~ .s 3 4 5 63 7 B f' 10, If ~ ~ ,~~ ~
;..",,0' , .- .("'~ h;..".".~. -. , . , , . , . . ~ '~"6~~.
':,~, .r: 101 I" ':" :; -' T'" ";:" '0'" """ 13\." ,:r,.. i :: II ' Z, .JS'" ~ <;
) . 5040 5030 5020 5010 --"950 49 4920 4"0 4900 -~~A, . ~O 4800" liI.....'- 4160-UOcr '- -'Cl).--Jf~-'" ~ ~
:C~:;:tc~1t l~~fs.'ZQ~fY. ,..t':j~~l 4935 .P" 491$ 490-. .'" TEf18.!,"CE 4.... _~!f/.f;" ~.~ 1.":4f .: ~ ~ Of ~;_:;~ '" ~
~:'~'~:li.JIO. l:'L_j;"l:_!~"~I"l". . '. '. ", -. ..,-'f.\.....~~'.'.d:.~.Z.., "'w J.~.::z--.-..~
.e~~;....10~ II ~IZ"~~~..r-".1 ~ Z 3 4 5 , 7:.Jt" ,", ~ 10 JlZ~",1 ~ :;;... "i~M ~~~
~~~.;;:."'<..~,:\ -e'i:-:....,,~!t.,;, 10'." . , , .-, - "V .. .1l>L.iL So I--..JIUL ~~. l;)~~i
" "-"'~" "~~:"~",'~" ,lot.! 'l('lo" " " ill Ii w o,;~~, ~-~--1~L~~~-'~.':"
l'\\" Q' ~ ~ '" "!<>~. "~"''''' {,','..', 0 18 I; 16, IS ,'14 13 IZ .. ," ~ ~~'" . 8.
:.".~;~ - 14..',"":~1~'" ~ 0 .."i"';..; '0'..< '_ ~ ~ ~ '. ~o,..,- B"'," ~!!4." -~O~--~~
"'w'~-<;"O'~ "r., 1/ .S60it950 0 _;~W.~J'\ON^...O::'lANE.'"" :::f f"'~.~-3"'" ",,':j.'" ~ci''''':::'~
I'_'~ '" ~ . 8 ~ 4." 1"'1; ~ Tt l.~~" ....._.~ """861 48<<' 480l..T. L,I~ .. . ~ - IJB 95 1 /2$ , J ~'o
,~~O '1'&' IB.n;:" I 1;"'''' 1-"';':""." )*.~ ~ "', .SOI... it "~ . ". 0:: "~,'." :1..... :o-_o..~--A'
t. - ~--....- - IS ~?J...., " -\.. \" 1', .. ~ 5 . 4 . 3 Z" I <( "". II r--:::-- Co I III uu 7'\Vt
.~ ,"I.: "''''-0 -~..;.... 1 't.;:~ 0 ;.\).',.... ~...-r=-....:v..} 8' _ - J!. :J:~;;:: 4! .f~ 1I'Z'-",,01 ..\IIIZ.0~."~_
~.o"""'(~ . 4'.J...... ~~:.#,~ . 1~I.a 10 n .0". n n 110 U '::...... ~ a. T,Zo . ofo~ '0
.. 4- ~, -::,;: I~'.,%~. 1r. ,,---.., -. ~"'".' "3 0: -1oU~ " ;, 06>. 11 0 !II ~~"iJ ';;;
'. ~~. ~ \ . >>- .:.1.....~ ,q' .. " GOOf:.... !P..a.~.i - ;",.;.YJ"" t6
,0 ''''.:'''~ 'J;:-""" ,'~:: 17'~i~0~,q'~I~ai.8 ^...\~~:;'g Zo 71. 22 ~'NO': s. ~t~~,i:; "10_"!I.;l>' ~.,,;1. ..
2'!> ~Y'''<V-'.. ..... ......:~,.~.u. ',.' , . . ,..,.n. ~'''.'t~~-:Mt~:'}blllS:-
. '!. " .. "l ,,-,r-:. <:.0;. .... 111l~ I.';:'~ ~ 12'.8' ~ ~ II.. I.. '0."'/ <,.,'. 0'.:;: < - '" :\'njl ~ '"
'--!ill.." . 17,,';~'.f(. :,\:;:. .~ lPZl"~": t.a'Jf,;'" '--:l ,\t~,;:.. ; ; 18 !<;N . '820E .::"'~' o,RIE:8OO, ANE .,~o'l'::' II.."", ~ ~ I /,>..... ~ t.!-
AARI....fO'LAUlt~7Z.W. ~~58N .-:eN'.> 01 ~.~ ~ ...."IVI. .sol'- '~76_":>'. ..~.~ ""~,,,.,.:l
1:... ~4J;:'''~ IS;' h' ~\ J ,-f.4. ~/.- 14 1(, Tl4 ,I'. ~~7;'" ;,~ _._ 'u
'0. '00 ~147 '" !l.,,1Z'~- 12<.~. 2~ '" ,.~ ;t--,J[:Il' Uj'S"... \:. ':"1.11 ".."-..., 0 ;::. ":' ~:;i::i:<
$12'.~ -.,=tel ~'t.~_!;.. /'Q:;:. o' ,.. 8 2 7",~~,;o". t! a~.:~.7i~ 3"\.,:;:;,
8::j 7 ~ Ii"!.: "3."i!:;....,1~.;~ 4:':: I' ::e ~g.,O. 17~!:2::; 'UII "0 '20 14 . ""'1 3'.. ? J''-;'''' -__,
- -II" (,41 '" ........~...... . 10 !Ii - ... s. s, '-: ~.
~ -. #"'}4'!J :e .12S.I. ":- . .~".' ,'- 3 "H . _ .4111;~-.'-'
. '0. __.1.2.2...... ~ S ."', ,,;-.. ~" lI.I, W ~.,. c' & ~'2 ::--'.'J",,: ~::2
-~... <l:/:l ..... 3" ,,> ",. :: > N1:11 ~ " .,. 1 ~"Q:''';;"
Z 3. -~.. lil.:::":'~..' %o:g. <{.;: II '& ...~<{ -.. 25..' .. ....!'i
. ~ .~~'4 '-:c!..~ :e..'J~" ."'~. fI,i .'\1 ~O.3 ;:/0).'\",: .
$"0 "! "T7lo',. ~~., <~:"Jo . II . '. L"~.O ol/'),s' I ".' ?'4 <; ~ . 8 l S :':r~ ~ ~
0:' f 0 11"'.' I;)IQ. >- ~tlo ".0. 0 vL.O ~ IY'~' . o~ ",g :-t" 1.S';\~-u
~M.\.:O.NI.:~; RQ ~;.?} 2, ~,.~, ~. ~~Z IS.~.! g~,~:.;g::>, ,/:. F--.r-" 2~~;: l2:ii':'.~~~
.,06_., ""i."'<r>, 2.Z L () g. " a.:::. <!o,;.". \ ~ of'.\e- . 14;_~
. Z ~. 3 '" 4 . 'o~ o. I ~~ "'~ J. g.. 13 j 14 ~8 So :i~ 13 .2 (-f-:!:-,... l3, \.3 "l'::~o \AfJ1l3~.51 .:!.'I
~ tV~ r.5i~'S7"z1)'I4'. -"'4 . - -f\I '';f!l~ L"'- j ".~ 4620.
' 110 100.. ",'41 ",,' j;,;; ,.ZI II' 12" ..ZI IU"I_~..J,"~~ Mp:f{}N-
... Zo.J4C,;s. (jcr)'. ....'
I!.
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
..
Petition Number 0 J-... 7 - '-I Y
Date Received h ( ~ u/ 0 ~
Amount Received So. 00
($50 residential - $150 other)
.
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
4 q /5 Do UA. t..allft'~
2. BZA Petition Date
3.
\
tv I I T' (/
II
~ &-o/A~ I/~Il~t twill ~S'f2L
ity/State/Zip
ry'1-'.i{"47 -o1(~
Home Phone
Petitioner:
C /''"'--(/ {)ry -r;
Name
l-{ q /5 po Vt-<.,
Address
C 12- &t'i ~- C; 57{6 C4tl
Business Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
J)..wW\. Pr-tr-"'A ~/I-~dlN I
LIP + -, /5 lIP e, Ie.. f'l)
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: ~gle Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial
Commercial
Institutional
Bus. & Prof. Office
Other
'.
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
if c11J'J ctl\.t ~ --tIt' ~t. k;{./ ~Ctf
~tJu{'e-
.
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed,
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 50 representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
-.
~~~~~
Signat e of Applica .
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
t
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, thi:
means across both streets.
.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
- -
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project 01
other statements regarding the project.)
t'
Print Name Z. rN,^N cf\- -y:;:.~ ~ of L
Comment
Signature ? --r-~~__~
J(v
Address d--{ DO Qvd.t \ Ql )(I> f\ 6
Print Name
Comment
))On h 1-+\1rl ~
(/a-o~
Signature r;;)'t!f-- tf.~ Ac;Idress lfct-'6<J ~ If 1,-,.(
Print Name (Lhn.<,,\-i I1C mt d t,-iJ
Comment -Y()1.{ ~t.
Signature ~,~
Print Name
Comment
- ....l 541 ~ E \.-
~ l <:....
\-EAI:=-
1Sf::
Signat~re ~8~~~
J
Address ~(o{51:l0N.~ l-rJ
VEYING & ENGINEERING CO.
53()() S, Hwy, No, 101 Minnetonka. MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 79114 Fax (952) 474 H267
SURVEY FOR:
GREG
WILEY
SURVEYED: May 2()()2 DRAFTED: May 13. 2()U2
REVISED: June 17. 2(u12 to show minimum building setback lines and to adjust deck/add
gazebo.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 7. Btock 10. DAWN ACRES FIRST ADDITION. Hennep;n County. Minnnexota,
SCOPE OF WORK:
1. Showing the length and direction of h(lUndary lines of the above legal description. -The
scope or our services does not include determining what you own, which ili a legal maUer.
Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal- coun.<i,el.
if necessary, to make sure that it is correct. and that ~ny matters of record. such as easements. thut
you wish shown on the survey. have been shown.
2. Showing the: location of existing imrrovemcnt~ we deemed important.
3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monument'\ to mark the comer:-; of the property.
4. While we show proposed improVemCnl"i to your property, we arc not as Huniliar with
your ptans a.... you arc nor arc we as famitiarwith the requirements of govemmcntal agcncic::; a::;
their employees arc. We suggest that you review the survey to confirm that the proposals art: what
you inlend and spbmit the survey to such governmental agencies a..'i may have jurisdiclion over
your project to gain their approvals if you can.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
"e" D~nUles 112" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set. unless
otherwise noted.
GRAPHIC
SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
~~ I
( IN FEET )
\
\\~
\
~6
'y
\
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and
Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
~,."" 1:1 6?"~no
am s H. Parker r.E. & r.s. No. 9235
-<t
DONA
LANE
N
'"
'HALT
~
C)
~
9
I
I
I
I
,
'"
'"
I
I
I
I
I
@
,....
,.;
'"
,
,
,
,
,
MINIMUM BUilDING ~ -- - -
SETBACK LINE (TYP)
7.'"
\
\
\
L07
8
\
\~
~
EXISTING
HOUSE
~,
~
""""
D we NO. 020364
.
..
4 q '-5" DoV\.q L",,^<-
Street Address
"HOLD HARMLESS'
I, ~r-<f/}" Y 7: LA J ,'(-( 'Y I am requesting the City of Golden
Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) ~~C Ie. { &A.2..<=-b onto
my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that
I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a
variance(s) for this nonconformity.
At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me
to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is
not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its
original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley.
.
LI' <-t/ I' Y
Print ame
-r- W//~l/
,
~
~:ffr7/~ 4tJ44~
Signa ur
C - 11.A:JZ
Date
JJ Cw\ ()~
City of Golden Valley
Staff Signature
.
.
.
.
.
WWW'ri.goUm.vll~ Y
7-9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
4915 Dona Lane
Grea Wiley, Applicant
Greg Wiley, with property located at 4915 Dona Lane, has petitioned the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the
Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a deck
and gazebo addition onto the rear of the existing home. These proposed
additions meet building setback requirements. However, during the
construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property
and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building
setback requirements. Below is the requested variance:
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code
states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front
yard property line. The variance requested is for 2 feet off the
required 35 feet to a distance of 33 feet at its closest point to the
front property line along Dona Lane for the existing home.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
,"It
....
t_~:
.
5735 Olso'o Memorial ,
Highway
02- 7 -4.5
.
Greg Balke
.
'"
.
.
.
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax)
.Uey
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
5735 Olson Memorial Highway (Map 12) (02-7-45)
Greg Balke, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
Greg Balke, with property located at 5735 Olson Memorial Highway, is requesting variances
from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to
build a deck addition to the existing home. This addition conforms to the building setback
requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted
for the property and it was discovered that the existing home and shed do not meet setback
requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in
order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after the
applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless
form is attached.
. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7{C){2) Side Yard Setback.
City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side
lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a
width greater than 70 feet and less than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of
the lot width. The requested variance is for 8.6 feet off the required 10.9 feet to a distance
of 2.3 feet at it closest point to the west side yard property line for the existing home.
. The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory
Buildings. City Code states that the shed shall be at least 5 feet from any side lot line.
The property owner is requesting a variance for the existing shed to be located to a
distance of 2.8 feet from the west side yard property.
The City's file on this property does not contain the original building permit for the home, but
Hennepin County's property record system states that the home was constructed in 1945.
No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
Subject Property: 5735 Olson Memorial
Hwy
Greg Balke, Applicant
22
BPI
.~~M _M_
~--....~.J!..~ ~--
.. .... ....... ,. .
-; """::"~ ;,=t~. :.."
- -_...:'._.:-:..-"~'
y
~
;;;
!!:
I~
56
..
.
'I
I:i
/l.
,+
\:
6125
~
~
~
".>T~ _ _
.
301.9J
(P;rI of /6}5)
[/Jfh. Bib/<! /n5Iiluf<!
;or '.,r.z#
100
4 3 'Z
I- - -
5700 $650 5620
$701 5O.AVE'.5t
,.c
- 2- :;
,
~,o
'.ldS:S
'"
g 1_6~.
5~~O ~- tJ;
-~;:+-:t,.
570$ $625 ',d~
130 -US I
5 ~.pl.
_ l'
14o.JZ :
Us
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99).
.
Petition Number 0;) - 7 - y>
Date Received " I~{;I I)).
.
Amount Received its-a, CO
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
57 3 S- 0 I -S Clvt In e .. : J.
.. "11. ffUJ 7 .
2. BZA Petition Date
3. Petitioner. G:-lc-P "7 /3 ~ / k e
Name
6:) S ~ n / c, ''''' 1M.f'... U '<, t f) ,,- </ a-.J..
Address ' . ity/State/Zip
'7" 3- 5"7 :~-o /ff7
Business Phone Home Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition. please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
L~D..t '3 5-e ~ 1-:0. 33
S-'? -e CL (h c~ rf ~
~ I.U l-t ~ L. . . /;)
/
(A r ~ e 1
11~; f2v,L? ~ :2 I
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: X Single Family LS;. Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial
Commercial
Institutional
Bus. & Prof. Office
. Other
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
/< -e... 0 v'--<>. I it '^ j Y ~ 10 "- ; Ie!; h 'I 0 +- e x ;>.-1/ "7
r:-r <M+- '€- ,,-1'7 !J e Co t-
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed.
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 50.()O representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
.
.
.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project)
Print Name (:) A. V 1 I.:' 1- ;;; A.. R 70r-1
Comment /'t~'t. 0 () J l~ CI r 7 t' 'V -( /J I /YJ ~ /? I) t- Pi /i] 1:'-/\/"
Signature
11.- J ~4t:!4-..
Address S~6 / ()L>()~1 fl-1 /i..- ~ )1 Y
Print Name L orr,' moserna V1
Comment -11/(') r') tJ / e('h(}'~
\J
~
SignatureC/)~.I- ~~A~
Address ;5'-7.:)9 (l:;,,,,, /J1~nJ. fIr'lf
~(cleH. va. tCe!"; mn(:S-W;2~R.-
PrintName~ ~-P-^-M~L-
Comment /t~ QCjjCi!~(,
signature~@&rZh~-ff Address~ ~ft ~ /(,
Print Name (YJ " /(c Ih U.r ^ biD m
Comment No D.bf\<-C/~"'bl1
Signature -;;n:l ~ Address 5';zb 'jO.y:-.,../.J.c t4v<- fJ
l.
Print Name
. Comment
.
.
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Print Name
Comment:
Signature
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Ar-+-~~~' L
Address
Address
Address
Address
Address
centerline
STA TE
55
r-
I
~
"
~
~I
~
<;,
~,
~
~I
~
f
317. 80
N 89:58'07" If'
N
~
o Oenoles Iron monvmenl
l2l Oenoles vlllily pole
Parcel Area = 2/.776.5 sq. fl.
(0.5 acres)
H/CHWA Y
-/~
I
I
NO
l\
I
7 J. 30
N 89:58'07" If'
,I
/
/
I
/
f
I
\
\
\
\
~I
~
())
I~
f~
())
\
\
\
\
S 89 J'8V7N E
73.30 "~
/'
""-
Exisllng / st. ~
Hse. /580/"
19.2
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPERTY OESCRIP170N (os proVided by client)
/hat part 01 government Lot J. Section 3J.
Townslup //8, Range 21, descnoed as beglil17hg at
a poht on tile center/he 01 State Higllway No. 55
distont 3/7.8 leet east 01 the west line 01 said
Coyernment Lot J.' tllence eost on said centerline 0
dislance 01 7J.3 leel; tllence sovlll parallel willl
sa/d west /l'7c 01' CovcYnment Lot J a dlsIQnceo;....
J86.tl4 /eel; II~ence wesl 0 distance 01 7J.J /eet to
a pohl 387.34 leet sovlll or Ille po/nl 01
beg/n17lng; Illence nortll a distonce or J87..J4 reet
to Ihe po/nl 01 begh17lng. svbject 10 rigl1tsol tile
public oyer tile lIortll 90 leet tI1er~ol for higllway
purposes.
.
\
/
/
I
\
\
\
-18.8-
2.
"-
III
'" 7.1 . "-
<:i (;)'"
'4.iJ ~
.I - " \fl
1),"
~ ~ fti
::j .~~
~
~
f'.,,:
~
~
" ~
"
~~ ~ "
"
~'" l2l \ .~~ ~
s::s~ II
'I ~.~ ~
~~ ~
2- Q sileo' ~
~
.J. 1.1)
.J.l
I
\
\
\ \ ~
" \~
",,-"
.S 8958;?6N W
73.30- _____
"-
05
~
~
/
/ /
/ /
/'
,,/
....
....
lence
....--y
.,
...
....
File No.
11732 - B
PREPARED FOR:
DEMARS-GABRIEL
LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
3Q3Q Harbor Lane No.
Plymouth. JlN 55447
Pbone:(763) 559-Q9Q8
Fax:(763) 559-Q479
I hereby certify that this survey plan or report ...as prepared b..v me
or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Relistered Land
Surve)'Or under the JSJrB of the State of MiDDesota.
As surveyed by me this 5th day of June. 2QQ2.
Mr. Greg
Balke
~(,. v
Book-Page
400-49
MO. U4'.
Scale ''''30'
.
!; 7 35 () !,s0Vl t1l e>q 1-1",,'-7,
Street Address /
"HOLD HARMLESS'
I, G y.e~ h" Lk.Q ,am requesting the City of Golden
Valley to allow me t proceed with a(n) ~r UY1 + E"vr-!-Yt [)..p c k onto
my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonco~forming and that
I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a
variance( s) for this nonconformity.
At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me
to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is
not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its
original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley.
.
C V-€)i 13c,/K-e
Print Name
~17-B'I/~
Signature
Datec' /'1/ 0 :L
JJ~ O~
City of Golden Valley
Staff Signature
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
wwmci.goUm_vlt~y
7 -9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of ZoninaAppeals
5735 Olson Memorial Highway
Grea Balke, Applicant
Greg Balke, with property located at 5735 Olson Memorial Highway, has
petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from
the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a deck
addition onto the existing home. This proposed addition meets building
setback requirements. However, during the construction planning
process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered
that the existing home and shed do not meet building setback
requirements. Below are the requested variances:
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) Side Yard Setback. City Code
states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or
structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following
requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 70
feet and less than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15% of
the lot width. The requested variance is for 8.6 feet off the
required 10.9 feet to a distance of 2.3 feet at it closest point to the
west side yard property line for the existing home.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code
states that the shed shall be at least 5 feet from any side lot line.
The property owner is requesting a variance for the existing shed
to be located to a distance of 2.8 feet from the west side yard
property.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
...'
'J
~.~
.
6498 Westchester Circle
02-7 -46
.
Michael Pierson
.
v
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
6498 Westchester Circle (Map 17)(02-7-46)
Michael Pierson, Applicant
Date:
July 17, 2002
Michael Pierson, with property located at 6498 Westchester Circle, is requesting a variance
from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to
build a room addition to the existing home. This addition conforms to the building setback
requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted
for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback
requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in
order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after the
applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless
form is attached.
. The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City
Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line.
The variance requested is for .7 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.3 feet at
its closest point to the front property line along Olson Memorial Highway for the existing
home.
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in June of 1967 for the
construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
.
.
Subject Property: 6498 Westchester Circle
Michael Pierson, Applicant
.
I
I
, I
.
Q
~.
~ ~
~~ ~ '"
'" . 6
'" ~
~! ~~ !:! ...
.
}~C) "
r::~ !:!
~
.. <>
"l !:!
.."\ N ~
~~
'"
'^ l1
..
"'!.
0
~ Q
7 0 .N
r- ,.('"
. t
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
Petition Number 0 d -7 -"( '"
Date Received b I J. ~ / 0 ?-.
Amount Received S b.. ib
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
2.
& J..[ 9~ W f6IcHe]~ (i/Li 1(. f ~I ~;J
BZA Petition Date -? / 2. '3 / 0 )-.
Petitioner: IY)I [;jfteL . (J;enfON
Name '
&Lf9,f' iPerktk~/!
~dress
~tlCl:) 99,f ~>, 99
Business Phone
lk/lev
(
3.
.. IA 5"~427
C/~cl-P Go/J)f!rl 'It/ley. Jf1A/.
City/State/Zip , .
7/,;?-~?J- {9bP
-
Home Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: ~ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office
Other
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
V ~\f'ri\IL€ rl9ft ~X S',-h'v) {jAIL4]t
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acc~ptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed,
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ s-o,OD representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
~~
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
t
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This. includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project)
PliotName 44"J1 ~I/~,)K,y/ FoiJ<<~;/- g~,/::'115KY
Comment
Signature Address
4~
Print Name
. Comment ,
Signature Address
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address -4 tt '1~ We5fcHep~r a,;;!
Print Name
Comment
Signature
Address
.
'31~IV~d N303 3^I~a an01~ ~NI^ 1.:1 01>1>9
Jo^aAJns <J[[fUpp.rfl:J 02{ J[uPJd
pUD1 \IM
. \W
3:Jti3/d
73VH:J/W
A 311 tins .:10
31 V:J/.:I/1 ti3:J
'.
55, I-
W
W
LL
o
"<t
z~
o
N
W
--.I
<(
o
, 0 (f)
\' - -
I\-- - - - -",A
~t \'
~"
~
.
..............
a
1O<t.
lOGo
ex:.
G
Zw
~\.U
)- <t. m
<t.\-~
s2:.~
xGz
~Ct:.
_LL
X'-
.
/.;$. \
0(2 .1{:
Oo.'6'~ """";>
o~""""\
~
z
w
z 0
z' 0 <0:
Z
0 i= :;{
i= <0: a:: w
<0: > Cl Z U
> w ::; Z <0:
w -' w
-' W U >- 2 N
W I- <0: I- Z r<)
I- 0 4- ::; ci
0 lL a:: i= ON ~
=>
lL (/) (/) => i= I- "-
(/) 4-
Cl Z Cl a...~ Z (/)
0 w 0 <0: -Oo:::=>
Z (/) i= w O:::OWO ll)
i= 0 :c N
(/) lL U a:: -.0S~ O..JI-O to
0 W w (/)CO(/) r<)
X a:: a:: >
w lL is 0 '-(.0 w wz
:\ <{?- O..f:CO::: \I
II \s ..J,,-Ow <0:
<( I-z w
a::
C)I-(/)Z <0:
wOWw I-
..J..J~:C 0
-'
5 12041'
t
1
'Z""'Cf p
0\", \
o \
\
1
01
~\
\
1
\
~. .;. . ::
a
c::)
l")
3:
0)
2".'
\
\
\
\
\
\
0')
~\
\
\
\
\
\
_-1------
COliC cR
"pROll EsT c::.
W[ST~~CL[
o
<D
o
<D
I
\
I
\
----
--
--
.
.
6'-1 9r f/"er~~ C/~-{'lLe
Street Address .
"HOLD HARMLESS'
. I, I/YJ ,c!lrrtL- Pret:ib>J , am requesting the City of G?ld~n
Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) hlA-Sfer BtI)r~ K{;>~~ onto
my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that
I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a
variance(s) for this nonconformity.
At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me
to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is
not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its
original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley.
.
;J1tc ;/;U?L!d& JoJJ
~~
Ig au e
r,J7/0Z,
Date I
aJ~ O~
City of Golden Valley
Staff Signature
.
.
.
.
.
WWW.Ci.~Um_vll~ Y
7-9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
6498 Westchester Circle
Michael Pierson, Applicant
Michael Pierson, with property located at 6498 Westchester Circle, has
petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance
from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a
room addition onto the rear of the existing home. This proposed addition
meets building setback requirements. However, during the construction
planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was
discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback
requirements. Below is the requested variance:
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code
states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front
yard property line. The variance requested is for .7 feet off the
required 35 feet to a distance of 34.3 feet at its closest point to
the front property line along Olson Memorial Highway for the
existing home.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.
.
'lo
...
.
2360 Lee Avenue North
02-7-47
.
Mike and Mary Ellen
Schrauth
.
.
.
.
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
2360 Lee Avenue North (Map 5) (02-7-47)
Mike and Mary Ellen Schrauth, Applicants
Date:
July 17, 2002
Mike and Mary Ellen Schrauth, with property located at 2360 Lee Avenue North, are
requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have
approached the City to build a deck addition to the existing home. This addition conforms to
the building setback requirements. However; during the construction planning process, a
survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not
meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold
Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done
only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The
Hold Harmless form is attached.
. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback.
City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property
line. The variance requested is for .2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.8 feet
at its closest point to the front property line along Lee Avenue North for the existing home.
. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks.
City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side
lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a
width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance
is for.6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.4 feet at it closest point to the north
side yard property line for the existing home.
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in July of 1966 for the
construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
"
.
Subject Property: 2360 Lee Avenue North
Mike and Mary Ellen Schrauth, Applicants
CITY OF
CITY
RICE
LAKE
PARK
CITY ., ~~ V,AL4$y
RESERVE
OUTLOT A
-0
~
'.if-
4
s
'.11/
6
EJ.'"
"A"
;;;",.6
___..Ll.1_.
.
.
.
.
(Revised 1/99)
Petition Number 0 :i-. "'1 - <f 1
Date Received -; - S- (() L
Amount Received ~O _ C/O
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
r:2 3 to 0 LEE.Il t/ E. /!If};( 7'i-/
2. BZA Petition Date ..:JUL1;2 3 j ~oo d-
3. Petitioner: /J2iXE /J;v'D /J1.4,evf N/E~ 5CHRJClurf!
Na';t3&J LiE ArE- Nt) JJN 5512.. 2-
Address . City/State/Zip
b;;;2--5:29-77'-/5" ~7~3- S;?8~b19~~
Business Phone Home Phone
4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: X. Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial
Commercial
Institutional
Bus. & Prof. Office
Other
..
.
.
.
7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
SC-IfEEN'ED ~~cl-l
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis-
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must
show all property lines. buildings, and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed,
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this aRQlication are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $...)ti pC) representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
~ 14' .
/ iture of Applicant
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
..
.
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project.)
Signature ~~
Print Name ~i 55)"-
((kb,~
Address o1.q-ov I-c /f AC/d A..J&.
cr. v, /'YlN .:$- .:s-'7'~
. Comment
.
Signature
/tJL
Address 2.. ~t..1 ~ I...
~-t:;;'t z.. 'L
Print Name 1,'RtJ/lVi'lf HUM
Comment
Signature ~, ~
Print NameJ,)AN lAJA-s..(1D~
Comment
Address ::l ?~t? ~ -?L-
Signature :h~~ bi~"h* _
Address :;'.4~( L~_
~V ~~~<~
(
."
.
.
.,.....-...-............. .~
,JIll 11114 P-lIJ ...
~ ---
.......,J1!!~IU. _W_ lU
~.-~j'--::;r'- ..'." .-- ....
-:~-
JJ
IT
UROWN LAND SURVEYING,. INC.
, :,.1.11 Avenue South Suite 228 WOODROW A.. BROWN, R.LS.
i Il...tnington, MN 55425 President
c'l.....", (952) 854-4055 Survey. For: NORTH
I '... (952) 854-4268
Mike Schrauth Scale: 1"=30'
I {'IT #2400
L.V I
I. ~//2S.{/ ~
r -35:0- I...... .1
tri cO
1- -I
" -'11
30
I . Ii
II
..;.1
Goil
-* ,
~.~
.
(f.I
o 34.B
(l) +1- -
E 0
Cl. LOT
I, ,I
i'll
,
,
to
00
,
L()lO
00
or- ,-.
30
I ',e;, 7
r-- ~ ---
I t",T
LVi
""-1
L- I
. Denotes lron
Monument Found
o Denotes iron
Monument Set
I
1 54.57 meas.
155.0 plat
.
en
-+-I 0
0 Q)
a. E
0 IX)
. .
I{) .q-
0 0
'l""" ,...
ti: 20
~r As: /1
~~~l
<:J 0
\!', N 155.0 plat
155.04 meos.
.,-
I~
PROPERT'f' DESCRIPTION
NOTE: No$eorch Was
Made For Any
Easements.
1 ..1- 20, Block 2, MER1BEE HILLS 3RD ADDiTION. Hennipen County, Minnesota
',....~by certify ~h~t this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under
. llrect supervlsKm and that I am 0 duly Register-ed Land Surveyor under the
I . '<:, of the State of Minnesota.
O~OWN LAND SURVEYING, INC.
..-<// / ~
"''-,<~.
___~ Dded: July 3, 2002
.
.
.
.
023 feD L~E AVE. !\Ib,
Street Address
"HOLD HARMLESS'
I, tniK~ cf-/I1f}r<fEJJEJ5:J+~m requesting the City of Golden
Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) C::;CrGI5UED PoRcH onto
my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that
I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a
variance(s) for this nonconformity.
At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me
to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is
not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its
original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley.
M~
4trl1rS~
(J~ IJ ~
City of Golden Valley
Staff Signature
/Il1,.( ~E// e dYfl/f/lU'7Jf
Prim ~~
~ure
7-3- tJ 2-
Date
.
.
.
.
~dgdUm_vll~ Y
7-9-02
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
2360 Lee Avenue North
Mike and Mary Ellen Schrauth. Applicants
Mike and Mary Ellen Schrauth, with property located at 2360 Lee
Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning
Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The
applicants are proposing to build a porch addition onto the rear of the
existing home. This proposed addition meets building setback
requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a
survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the
existing home does not meet building setback requirements. Below are
the requested variances:
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code
states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front
yard property line. The variance requested is for .2 feet off the
required 35 feet to a distance of 34.8 feet at its closest point to
the front property line along Lee Avenue North for the existing
home.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code
states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or
structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following
requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or
more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested
variance is for .6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.4
feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the
existing home.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, July
23,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden
Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or
comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning
Department at 763/593-3992.
Adjacent properties require notification.