The URL can be used to link to this page

11-26-02 BZA Agenda . . . Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7PM 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - October 22, 2002 II. The Petitions are: 3114 Orchard Avenue North (02-11-67) Daniel and Debbie Kubes. Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback .4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 31 feet for the proposed front entryway at its closest point to the front yard property line along Orchard Avenue North. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a proposed entryway addition to the existing home. 2140 Kelly Drive (02-9-59) George and Helen Peterson. Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 9 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 26 feet for the proposed room addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Kelly Drive. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a room addition to the existing home. 9015 Elgin Place (02-11-68) Paula and Michael Watkins. Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 9.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25.5 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Elgin Place. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. . . .. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (B) Rear Yard Setback . 9.5 feet off the required 16 feet to a distance of 6.5 feet for the proposed deck at its closest point to the rear yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a deck addition to the existing home. 2485 Regent Avenue North (02-11-69) Sandy and Mark Bartel, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Regent Avenue North. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks . .7 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.3 feet at its closest point to the south side yard property line for the existing home. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard setback requirements. 2560 Kyle Avenue North (02-11-70) Gary Hansen, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks . 5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 10 feet at its closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed deck. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a deck addition to the existing home. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment 2 . . . Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 22, 2002 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, October 22,2002, in the Council Conference Room, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Sell called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Those present were Chair Sell, members Cera, McCracken-Hunt Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were Staff L' Recording Secretary Lisa Wittman. I. Approval of Minutes - August 27 and Septemb MOVED by Smith, seconded by Shaffer and motio~ nanimously to approve the August 27,2002 minutes as submitted. Smith stated he was absent at the Septe meeting, but the minutes didn't reflect that. MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, sec approve the September 24, 200 era and motion carried unanimously to h the above noted change. II. The Petitions are: 1808 York Avenu Ricardo and r from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback eet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 33.4 feet for the xisting home at its closest point to the front yard property line along York Avenue North. . 10.2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 24.8 feet for the existing deck at its closest point to the front yard property line along York Avenue North. Purpose: To bring the existing home and front porch into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(3) Side Yard Setbacks . 10.25 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 3.75 feet at its closest point to the east side yard property line for the existing home. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 22, 2002 Page 2 . . 8.25 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 5.75 feet at its closest point to the east side yard property line for the proposed dormer window addition. . 9 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 5 feet at its closest point to the east side yard property line for the existing front deck. Smith asked what the pro property line. Olson state Purpose: To bring the existing home and front deck into side yard setback requirements and to allo a proposed dormer window addition to th ormance with nstruction of e. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. · .2 feet off the required 5 feet to a dis existing detached garage at it .8 feet for the oint rear yard property line. Purpose: To bring the existing det accessory building requir . Olson stated that the applicants are p second floor of the rear of the home requirements. He added that the garage also require variances. uild a dormer window addition on the es a variance from setback e, the front yard decks and the detached e is between the dormer addition and the would be 5.75 feet to the east property line. McCracken-Huntask cond itions had b because of the I licant would still need a variance if all of the existing It . Olson stated that they would still need a variance he house on the lot. rred to the survey and stated that part of the neighbor's shed was perty. Daria Pardo, applicant stated that the neighbor's shed had Shaffer asked the applicant what the neighbor to the south thinks about the proposed addition. Pardo stated thattheir house is closer to her property line than hers is to theirs and that they have said they have no concerns regarding the addition. McCracken-Hunt stated that most of the requests are for existing conditions and that the dormer window would be a good addition. MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Smith and motion carried unanimously to . approve the following variance requests: 2 Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 22,2002 Page 3 . · 1.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 33.4 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along York Avenue North. · 10.2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 24.8 feet for the existing deck at its closest point to the front yard property line along York Avenue North. · 10.25 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 3.75 feet at its closest point to the east side yard property line for the existing home. . 8.25 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 5.75 feet at its east side yard property line for the proposed dormer window · 9 feet off the required 14 feet to a distance of 5 feet at its 10 0 the east side yard property line for the existing front deck. · .2 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 4.8 feet f, garage at its closest point rear yard property line. 1810 Major Drive (02-10-66) Celeste Shahidi A Iicant Request: . 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . . .5 feet off the req existing hom along Majo ~to a distance of 34.5 feet for the st point to the front yard property line Purpose: { g home into conformance with front yard irements. Request: Section 11.65, Subd. 5 (A) Standards . t off the required 75 feet to a distance of 15 feet for the g attached deck at its closest point to the Ordinary High ater Mark of Sweeney Lake. 0.5 feet off the required 75 feet to a distance of 4.5 feet for the existing freestanding deck at its closest point to the Ordinary High Water Mark of Sweeney Lake. . 54 feet off the required 75 feet to a distance of 21 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the Ordinary High Water Mark of Sweeney Lake. . 70 feet off the required 75 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the proposed gazebo at its closest point to the Ordinary High Water Mark of Sweeney Lake. Purpose: To bring the existing home, attached deck, and freestanding deck into conformance with Shoreland Regulations setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a gazebo on the property . 3 . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 22,2002 Page 4 Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings .2 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 8 feet for the proposed gazebo at its closest point to the principal structure. The gazebo would also not be located completely behind the home. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a gazebo 0 Olson stated that the applicant is proposing to build a gaze behind the existing home and does not meet the building Sweeney Lake. He stated that the existing home, attac also do not meet setback requirements for the Residenti Sweeney Lake. ompletely rements from freestanding deck cHstrict and for Smith asked how the applicant received a bui applicant wasn't aware she needed a permit the applicant has agreed to move the g that be made a condition of approval. it. Olson stated that the the pr osed gazebo. He stated that e flood plain and suggested that Smith asked Olson for some his the Shoreland Ordinance was i that a permit was pulled in attached deck but that it i operty. Olson stated that he didn't think hen the house was originally built. He added 973 for the construction of the home and the freestanding deck was built. McCracken-Hunt ask Natural Resources. all of the varianc e had spoken to Tom Hovey from the Department of dthat Mr. Hovey and the City Engineer have reviewed and that both of them recommended denying the proposal. Celeste S t stated that her house was .built in 1973 and that she has lived in this a little over one year. She stated that she wants to preserve the shorel d an he has received approval from the City for boulders and rip rap to be insta stated that they have no back yard and that it is her goal to create an outdoor livl pace. She stated that the height of the gazebo is 7.4 feet and that it wouldn't block her neighbor's view. She explained that the gazebo would be dry laid on gravel. Cera asked the applicant what she thinks the hardship is on her lot. Shahidi stated that the hardship is not having outdoor living space and that there is a drop off in the back. McCracken-Hunt stated that the applicant could choose to put the proposed gazebo in the front. Shahidi stated there isn't any room in the front and that she wants to be by the lake. Sell opened the public hearing. 4 Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 22, 2002 Page 5 . Hugh Maynard, 1420 Spring Valley Road stated that he is opposed to this proposal and that the proposed gazebo and the existing home are too close to the lake. He stated that the lot is too small for all the applicants want to do and that the hardshipwas created by the former owners not, by the lot itself. He said that the height of the gazebo is 13' 9" according to the plans provided by the applicant. He stated that this proposal has no hardships according to the Zoning Code. Shahidi clarified t gazebo, but contractor uilding the d that his III be even n Sweeney ryone would be destroy his property n tent, which wouldn't Robert Meller, 1800 Major Drive stated that the applicant iIIegall proposed gazebo and that city inspectors made her stop buil 'n view would be ruined and the lights being proposed around worse. He stated that there is no hardship and that ther Lake that has a gazebo and if this proposal were to be lining up for variances. He stated that the proposed gaz value and suggested to the applicant that she put interfere with his view and could be put away i Chris Meller, 1800 Major Drive showed the B window facing the applicant's house. S structure and that the gardens on the from the sun. es she took from her kitchen b he gazebo would be a massive Shahidi's property would be blocked . Delores DeFore, 1820 Major Dr gazebo. Shahidi stated th pictures shown by her ne' gazebo would be. Chris from her kitchen win d for clarification on the height of the proposed t it was 7 % feet tall. She referred to the ted that they show a view that is not where the ated that she would be looking right at the gazebo spectors did not stop the work that was being done on the to the City voluntarily to check on the work that her ajor Drive stated that granting this variance request would be anyone else along the shore line. Shahidi stated that her house is unique and that it is the only one on the lake like it. She stated that the request for variances for the existing home should be grandfathered in and that the home conformed to setback regulations when it was built. . Pete Helseth, 1805 Major stated he wasn't aware of what the applicant was proposing at the time he signed her application. He stated that he is opposed to the gazebo now that he has seen the plans and that he agrees that it would interfere with the Meller's view. 5 Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 22, 2002 Page 6 . Shahidi stated that the proposed gazebo could be made smaller. She suggested making it 14 feet wide instead of the requested 18 feet. Maynard referred to the survey and stated that it still wouldn't work and the lot is simply too small. Meller said that regardless of the size of the gazebo there is no hardship and no other house on the lakeshore has a gazebo. Sell closed the public hearing. Shaffer stated that the existing house does have hardships, but approve the variance requests regarding the existing freestan I Hunt clarified by stating that when that deck deteriorates a 0 without a variance. Shaffer added that he is not in favor · built in the shoreland area. Cera stated it's important built are different today, s 'dn't want to cCracken- n't be built d gazebo being Smith stated that building the proposed gazebo in compounding the existing problems with the pr deny all of the requested variances. lain would be t he would be voting to . McCracken-Hunt stated that she has tri could be set back from the lake far e stated that it would have to be a 1 far as a resultthat it would not w there is a location for it that wo if there was anyway the gazebo t the setback requirements. She eter gazebo and that it would be back so gazebo. She said that she doesn't think t environmental concerns when the house was portant not to compound the existing problems. MOVED by Cera, following varianc haffer and motion carried unanimously to approve the 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet for the existing home at its e front yard property line along Major Drive. required 75 feet to a distance of 15 feet for the existing attached deck t point to the Ordinary High Water Mark of Sweeney Lake. . 54 feet off the required 75 feet to a distance of 21 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the Ordinary High Water Mark of Sweeney Lake. The following variance requests were denied in the same motion. . . 70.5 feet off the required 75 feet to a distance of 4.5 feet for the existing freestanding deck at its closest point to the Ordinary High Water Mark of Sweeney Lake. 6 . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 22, 2002 Page 7 . 70 feet off the required 75 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the proposed gazebo at its closest point to the Ordinary High Water Mark of Sweeney Lake. · 2 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 8 feet for the proposed gazebo at its closest point to the principal structure. The gazebo would also not be located completely behind the home. Sell reiterated that the Board approved the variance requests fo attached deck, but denied the variance requests for the frees n proposed gazebo. inghome and and for the III. Other Business Olson asked the Board to clarify a motion made at ' the property located at 2495 Quail Avenue No the variance requests and it was unclear if th for the existing home. mber 24, 2002 meeting for was for denial of all of ended to approve the requests MOVED by Cera, .seconded by McCr approve the following requests for nd motion carried unanimously to y located at 2495 Quail Avenue North: . .7 feet off the required 35 fe closest point to the front istance of 34.3 feet for the existing home at its ~rty line along Quail Avenue North. . 1 foot off the required closest point to th to a distance of 14 feet for the existing home at its yard property line. McCracken-Hunt 2002 where at 7105 D Council dis consi the directed requiremen t she attended the City Council meeting on October 15, ing Appeals decision was appealed. The property is located quest was for a garage addition. She stated that the City ird stall garages and told the Board of Zoning Appeals not to ng the variance appeal request as setting a precedent. They the Planning Commission to discuss current side yard setback nd third stall garages. Sell suggested having the December BZA meeting on December 17, 2002 instead of December 24. The Board Members were all in agreement to change the December meeting date to the 17th. IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 PM. 7 . ~ -.. I . . 3114 Orchard Avenue North 02-11-67 . Daniel and Debbie Kubes . . . . Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) alley To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 3114 Orchard Avenue North (02-11-67) Daniel and Debbie Kubes, Applicants Date: November 20,2002 Daniel and Debbie Kubes, with property located at 3114 Orchard Avenue North, are requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a room, garage and front entryway addition to the existing home. The room and garage additions meet building setback requirements. However, the front entryway addition requires a variance from setback requirements. The following is the requested variance: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the. front yard property line. The requested variances are for 4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 31 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Orchard Avenue North for the proposed entryway addition. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in June of 1948 for the construction of the home No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 3114 Orchard Avenue N Daniel and Debbie Kubes, Applicants . .71 ..71S . '0. 100 . aPe';l)' P.Jlf;i~/7e . 100 100 too' "" 101.. I 10L14 . ~ /33,.5 .. ~4L ... .. ~ ;;1I\i. li&_-e:;: ....~!. ~..J) 133.': ~ .~~ a~.'" ! -~,.. . \1 . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0').- "- " Date Received III <flo }- Amount Received ~{)-'OO ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN V ALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property. involved in this petition: 311~ C),eu~ 4h Ad BZA Petnion Date 10Vb>l~l:A ~/.)OO). Petitioner: ~ltL Ant) IItM'l N:d~j ~{/r ()~t.~ ~ /10. (jOU1t.-~ /fl....S!l/,)).- 0,/, ~dress City/State/zip 'IS-)-9)1/~,J./:;o(J . . 7b3 $"8J..6111 Business Phone Home Phone 2. 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Lpgal D.escriPtion of property involved in this petition (found on survey): . }ILL ().I LOib, t!.;<cl;I'r 71J.4.r jJlIV LYI/" MW t:J~ A (tn.t "L.,-'/t.J;.- t.,AIUc/..LJ:A.. J ~ ~/~tIr tJ.J 4~ AA 1l~J.nJU'1 UI'l1:. ~O". i lY4r~ 6/0 lbr s- Lt'/"~ 114w OJ A {.-t,.~ f)iAw~AIIA~~ ~ Iks~r ~?;ltJ:r ~t; I AfM:Ut.U4 /}r R.1'I/r ~'US, tbt- .ouw.'1li/l~ 1'JJt.u.o,l. exl . {AJ(01)(..~...... ,4. Type of property involved in this petition: I I 6. Residential: ~ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other .. . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved. in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. $t1l,~4lm,;" ~t. AtJIJ~fl~ at A /J(J,tcJ 1lJ~(J~ I . .. ~ .. _ - - , lJa. st.. .lY ~ ~ 0< 31' c{. /itJt?; ;'11>- 1\ f tA1t DtlJUIf //t.r.J 6.4rt.~ , - i 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this aeplication are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the am unt of $ :i).cJO representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST,IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. 11 . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting Of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the requesland gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) PrintName 1l/c:>f?MA/V E Comment 490r.r- <:5-00./) . RuD To /""; /:2 I '" Signature ~~ ~ Address 3 I L)?> eJf<c#4RJ) AvE. . Print Name ..fJrMy &rr%Ylt1rrd.er Comment .A~<\ rrear I Signature 1fJ~. &,yrnrdA Print Name ,8ro..d ~~ rve ( Comment Lx>v.s~('eN~' A<;idress 3//5 /foh/e. Jj.vf; .. Signature ? ~ . V~~ Print Name ~5A . ?dzer' Comment '&7-)- W/~ &:-: I Address 3\&'-\ ~ .4~ At, Signatu~ Address (3/tt5' O~d~ Mg. . . . Comment Print Name R ~ be" f t l"hFo6a.(4 . . Signature /Zr~~~ - --- Print Name --1mJL '-r6/G 1"2- / C) Comment Address s{ of 0 a/H." J IIV( 11 Signature Address ..2/ :5 7 Oi&tL.h,4,t.b 4vG AI, Print Name fI7 ~A Y V A,S/f- /J ~ Y Comment Signature . &n~~~- Address 3(/Z?' cDJrcJ1YrJ .~ AI Print Name Comment ':f Mv,stI;J ~o-f nJo 'P;bJJ~ ,-I /tW ~ Signature A60. /J!Mf S!vMA ~ 3l$O-Z7r:l!:~J Print Name Comment: Signature Print Name Comment Signature Address Address . . . November 4, 2002 To City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals My wife Debbie Kubes and I are the home owners at 3114 Orchard Ave. No. Weare requesting a variance for the front of our home. Currently our home has a design flaw. Our front entrance is indented approximately 6 feet by 6 feet, into the foundation of the house. Even though this area is covered by a roof it is open to the elements. From time to time we have had problems with water in the entry way. The cement slab covering this area leaks on to our ceiling of the basement. It was part of our strategic plan to create a solution to our problem in which our house had a special area to become open and inviting to our neighbors Our solution was to enclose the indented entry way and place a small open porch on the front of the house. The porch will cover an existing well room and extend out from the front of the house four feet. With a roof width of 17 feet 6 inches. The open porch will help to foster a friendly neighborliness and a civic commitment to enhance my neighborhood. We believe porches are a place to extend our hospitality, to make friends and greet neighbors. The project we are proposing shows we have great pride and respect for our community. Weare making a conscious choice to make Golden Valley our lifelong home. Daniel and Debbie Kubes 14- 1AII,r .srtMl/f rlZlll!lt 11,,1/5& ~. ~JIJ() umefit xooO.o = Existing elevation Bearings are assumed 1-;- - - - - J$" I . - .;O~ el I-~-- J 'R'~ G/. ~ 8P~."S/ - - - - - - 1$' I It.J ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ '" I'- I ./~IfOCC;t:tJ , . / 1.0b;i"/~ft/ t'.::,~..-/{ " , ST':"''';.J/~ eXlsi;'? c.,,ycrek 67Np 3/ \ ..) ~ l 1CY92.7 I' ",,,,,,,,I IR",,"" 41. = 8'+, 22. ) - ~ JS CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: Daniel C. Kubes 3114 Orchard Ave. Golden Valley, MN N 55422 NP.3/24 plY'/! 511W'7' F=/b!hl'c #iHl5e: 2..$ 1'Itf.2. " r 7' -,' I I'__c....J ~ :;:. \,'v I f F/lA/PG 1 I \ /)' AIL. . t.';'8 .. I L",r,: " &:4R~e ,/ _ _~-.!..3c.()O-AfS9"'t?ri:'SNE_-_~'~~' _:_fS'~-~___ I EXCI'"pr/i"v .... . I ,If,,,, E/,al9'}.. H "- ~ \ 0- I I ,>-I ... I 8'1(,,(, ;I; C' ~fj17./ ? >t_ ~"'/'1 LtA',/(' P.....CG /.D '~ " 2'f \, '? ,,'\ \ J \ ' ./ !/p. "/1- IJNE /- L.~I 6 Al.€4 =III;IW ~ff, I <~ ~ ~ I I( I>:l "- "- 1 ::; ~ 57UJU( FPAQIE " d()f{)C x?97.5 -------- 8"7.., ~ I I I... . .'" "dN'''''/~'f l?;!'tVCK/'N/ \ I -1-- ---- ri) 2,/ 2.2" '" F"Q4mb- 'i.: .... t:;;,.e4::E ,;Z .. '" :I: , ~ - ----.-..- I ",. : - /12.~o- ..s R'1(;(J/'ZS"W - 1"'- .... j I "".~ ~ ~ )' V\ \ ",,'/(,.$ / r -~ r 'nL) I .I I Legal Description: All of Lot 6, except that part lying North of a line drawn parallel to and distant 3 feet Southerly, measured at right ngles from the Northerly line thereof; that part of Lot 5 lying North of a line drawn parallel to and distant 3 feet Southerly, measured at right angles, from the Northerly line thereof, Block 1, WOODLAWN PARK. Benchmark: TNH, SW, intersection Orchard Ave N. with Triton Drive. N.G.V.D. 1929 adjusted elevation = 897.90 feet. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me this e 13349 35'-0' NSU OPEN ~POfilCIl JO'-l1' ~ ~ ~~) ~~2:'~~,N . NSU GAAAGl! GENERAL NOTES I. AU.. PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL TO FACE OF /I'WJ.. U.N,o. - /I'WJ.. THICKNESSES ARE NOMINAL. 2. AU.. 611"SUM 60ARD (6.6) PARTITIONS ARE SHOHN AS NOMINAL HIDTH HITH 112' 6Y1'. eD.. SCREH FASTENED.lINl..ESS O'f"HERHISE NOTED. 6. FIELD VERIPI' LOCATIONS AND GlJANTITIES OF AU.. MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EGlJIPMENT 4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RiLL RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIPI' ALL EXISTINq DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SJl3MITTIN6 BIDS ANY DISCREPANCY I3ETi'IEEN THE DRAHIN6S AND THE EXISTIN6 CONDITIONS SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE 8ROIJ6HT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHI1j:CT PRIOR TO PROCEEDIN6 H1TH THE HORK 5. COMPLY HITH ALL CODES. LAViS AND ORDINAl'GES 6OVERN1N6 THE HORK FOR THIS PROJECT. 6. LUMBER SHALL BE HEM-FIR OR DOU6LAS FIR No. 2 OR BETTER USE TREATED I'I?OD HHERE APPLICABLE. 1. THE PROTECTION OF EXISTINe MATERIALS AND SPACES SHAU.. BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. e. AU.. CONTRACTORS SHAU.. 6UARANTEE THE HORK A6AINST DEFECTS IN MATERIALS . HORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER HORK IS SJl3STANTIAU..T' COMPLETE. 'I. AU.. DEBRI5ITAA5H SHALL BE REMOVED IN A TIMELY MANNER. 10. AU.. DOOR. H1NDOH . 0PENIN6 HEADER5 SHALL f3E AS FOLLOHS. BEARIN6 /l'WJ..S 0-5'-0' OPENIN65 2-2xes 5'-0'-6'-6' OPENIN65 2-2xl25 NON-BEARIN6 HAU..5 0-5'-0' OPENIN65 2-2x6s 5'-O'-e'-o' OPENIN6S 2-2xl25 II. HHERE USIN6 DOUBLE MICROLAM BEAMS. FASTEN T06ETHER H1TH MIN. 2 ROHS 16 PENNY NAILS. 12'oc IN STA66ERED PATTERN. 12. FIELD VERIFY SITE 6RADIN6, LOCATIONS OF ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL ELEMENTS. 16. AT AU.. PERPENDICULAR TJI CONNECTIONS, USE APPROPRIATE METAL JOIST HAN6ER5 AND BLOCKIN6 AS REGlJIRED BY THE MFR. 14. FOLLOH TJI MAJllJFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STANDARD FRAMIN6 INSTALLATION. 15. SECURE PROJECT SITE AT THE END OF EACH HORK DAY. 16. PROVIDEOHNER HITH HAlVERS OF LIEN UPON RECEIPT OF PAYMENT. UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT PROVIDE AU.. FINAL LIEN HAlVERS, KEYS, INSTALLATION MANUALS AND HARRANTlES PRIOR TO FINAL PAYMENT. 11. NUMBERS INDICATED AT H1NDOHS RELATE TO MARVIN HINDOH NUMBERS. H1NDOHS SHALL BE MARVIN H1NDOH, CLAD, LOH E 6LA55, AR60N FILLED, HITH SCREEN , HARDHARE. PROVIDE /'tINTINS IF INDICA TED. HINDOH UNITS SHALL BE OPERABLE. EXCEPT FIXED TRANSOM UNITS. EXT. COLOR SHAU..BE SELECTED. HARDHARE FINISH SHALL BE SELECTED. Ie. ROOF MEMBRANE lAIIDERLAYMENT SHALL BE CARLISLE 040 MIL "DRI-5TART 'A' 5ELF~ADHERlN6 ROOFIN6 UNDERLAT'MENT' OR APPROVED EGlJAL. 1'1. FLOOR FINISH SELECTIONS SHALL BE BY OHNER - PROVIDE AU..OHANCE COSTS FOR INDICATED MATERIALS IN PROPOSALS. 20. SCHEDULE HORK TO MINIMIZE DISRUPTION OF EXISTIN6 SPACES. 21. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE HVAC SYSTEM. INSTALLATION . ASSOCIATED COSTS. 22. RELOCATE UNDER6ROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF HORK. 5'-0' ~ N INDEX TO A-~ GENE A-I EXISTI!N . DEMOLITION PLAN A-2 NEW FL OR PLAN A-3 EXTERI R ELEVATIONS A-4 INTERJO ELEVATIONS A~5 WALL S CTION . DETAILS A.6 -"D GARAGE PLAN' "LEVAri"'" . . 11 THE FOUNDA' Architects / Consultanu 2J2 T/Jird Avenue North. Mjnf.~oIjs. Mifl"UoIQ plume. 611.340.5430 faJ..6/1J40J43/ l~ftltlltthi'pllln.,peci"ClI~1 rlpoMwl."relHlrotdbymlor... .~I.uplt\'is'on&tlWtllrlllc regls~""""'" . underlhel~oiIltIIst81.OI .!!!!!!!!! ............... OIW_ Rill. No.....1!! ~ 10 (,) C 01) ~ ,S "r;;"i) 10"8 ~ e ..8 10 ::ll:l:: :.::: ~ 1 ::; & :8 ~ " 1 o g ~ . a Cl- Copy tight 2002 GeERAL NOTES & DRAWHG If)E Dale 8/281 Project No. 02- A-( ~TE EXleT WW -BEE f'UlN& Iffi , I fiEMOYl! EXIeT Ie' -=-.;.11..., I I DOCM~:.r,.l' I r=' I IflIIAl'1E. I I I. , _.J EXIeT~~"""\fii ~ 1 ~ 1;,01 r 'irlfv/l i "'.,. OED"""" EXleT Ir~ 111 EX. U-. ::Ell 4 ~ IllcLoe. I ~~ IL_JIS~ EXlsr. KITCHEN ~..JSX x. ~?= .,..... ~ -l.J ,.. .... - IOEMOYE ElCIeT WAU.. TTl" IlII;Lac:ATE EXleT IlPW -BEE I'l..AN& VA-2 II!El1O'rl: ElCleT POOR . FRAI1I! THE FOUNDATION Art;hitcctl / Consultanrs P. A. 212 Third A~1t Norrh, Suitlt 460 MiMCDpOIi.s, . Min.NUoto $54(}J pi>4M.6I2J4IH41O flU. 6J2J40.$4J/ EXIST. MASTEFol BEDFolOOM lCtr1fyIniltVlISplan,SPedftCllcn,cr repOl1wlIpreperedby me crlIldcrmy dirK! sup""'lIon" Ntl am.liit re;il1ered~ unoII' thelewl oI'h ....d ~... :-'~ Reg. No. 20803 EXIST. DINING AFolOOM = LIVING ~ EXleT ~ . FRAI1I! ="" El<l&T IlII;HOYE EXleT \ TTl". IIJALL 'I-=-=-~-=_ ,-_ -- _-'I - "'\ IIEX. I ----P!Il..:.~ -- \ CLOe. Ii~ I i 'Ii ---:'-=F~~ fiEMOYl! EXleT Ii!~ I I Jrll J .=::.~ 11 I I _T. """'" I =~. ___7 ': f.; I (TO BE DEMOLISHED) I II . flIIAl'1E. TTI" ~ El<l&T I I ~ fiEMOYl! EXIeT 1 II I', 1 L IIJALL TTl". I I 'h IIL~-----.J I,ll IS = _ _ IMl _ ~ :.d.; 'I fiEMOYl! El<l&T ____==---=- _II 1"ClRClof~~ ___=:::!.o &LI.I!4~G $ tli:lIl::5J I. REMOVE EXI5T1N6 51DIN6 . ~"'IR. EXI5TIN6 5rEA1lfIN6 AS !oI:EDED .., u :: Cll .g .5 wt; 7) ~~ .B 4.l ::l~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~ < ~ .<> 1l~ Q ~~ ~ . ~ Ii ':0 Q CopytrJhl2OO2 Q) EXISTING FLOOR FLAN AND DEMOLITION FLAN CAN A-I SCALE: 3/16" = 11-0" . EXlSTWG I ~ PLAN Date 8/28/02 Project No. 02-10 A-I . . . Nel1 PORGH GONc.REre SLAa a'-ai' S1.A6 (I<ESl.RFAGE TO M,", TCoH IEl'tl _ GONGIlE1l! STOOP TO MY!: FlOOST FOOTINISS Master 6edrm Pl'lE-EH6ltEERED ROOF 'TRJS6eS M!JO'Vf! .1,IOC 1'-6 6'-11" ROOF UN!: ~ ROOF 'TRUSs SllPPORT E!E.!oH!; FlELOG,",TeD ~ se: PEt'lO Pl.NI v ~ ... o[J "1 (2)2'-0' Ciao. /" 6'-6' -/ - "f3edrm -....l t 01 ~r TILE FLOOR FlEl.OGA TeD i'C>W, see DEHO Pl.NI ~ in 6edrm "M:>Teo P,",TGIf i'IOOD FLOOR TO HI. TGIf EXlS11N6 m , a Dlnfne Livlngroom INS1: ^'-L snu:; T. B&.MON am; 10I!2 OF EXIST. STIWCoT. BOTTOM OF B&.M F\JJSH ::~:~s::::~ + ~~-":~L_ __"'_ IIC.IO I,---~~~-~-. -II I EXlS11N6. I I TRII'lZ 2Xb POST - A ......16H B:16e OF ~ j I ~~ I '" w.u.. I I~PeAK OF SL.OPe I = - ~ ~ = ili" , ... = r;:' ill r '3'_12)' 12'-2' ~ I. . 1/2' 6YP5UM I'f.AoU. eoAAD ON I'oI..L. I'f.AoU.S & 510' ONI'oI..L. GEILIN6S. 5/0' TYPE 'X' 61'B ON 6AA.'6E I'f.AoU.S AD..l.'oGEIfT TO LMN6 SPI'a:5. 2. 6 MIL Y,",POR B.'IRRIER oN K'.RM SIDE OF I'oI..L. EXl6il.10Ia K'.LLS. FLOoRS & GEILIN6S. 3. PROVIDE PC>i'ER & GABLE GONNEGTION FOR RJ1U'lE TYIHEDIN.-.uDIO GJooBINETS. NElo'\l r..1 n9!!T .Nl)"TE5. FLOOR STRlJc:;rlA~E TO ee, I. OBI.. MIGROLAM llE"'M ON NoRTH I'f.AoU. & G_ OF SPo'doI. EXreNDED INTO 11-E HOUSE MIN. 4'-0' & BOLTeD TO EXIST FLOOR JoiSTS. 2. Dfll.. HICfiOl...AH llE"'M AL.ON6 EMT K'.LL TO SIT ON _ FOl.tID... 110N & fW.l5ER FROM NORTH flEH15. 3. INFILL ElETi"eEN flEH15 1'1/2)0'5 .,6' DC. 4. IN5TI'oI..L. PL Yi'IOOD FLOOR & FINISH TO MA TGIf EXlS11N6. 5. INTI'oI..L. YN'OF/. BAFlRIER _ PL Yi'IOOD FLOOR WF\A.L ~Y1'lY e.o. IT 1N5U1.A11ON & 'I'1'lEI\ TED PL Yi'IOOD lJNDER51DE. ; a 31'-4' ~ FLOOR FLAN EBN A-2 SCALE: 3/16" = 11-0" . . THE FOUNDATION ArchilfCtllCOfUulranr3 P.A. 212 TJu',d A\lfIW~ Nonlt, SWIft 160 MinMCpOli8, MlntlUOfQ ~40J p/toM.612.J40.$4JO JilL 612.340.j431 I '''''Y hlllnis plsn. spedl\c:atcn, r:s repon was preplred Dr mealllde-my ClI~$Upllf"iiIiGrl'I\ItI~.OAy l'flSliSlerM ---=r unCleflhl'IWloIlne5tltar;l -.. ~Re;. No. .20803 , 0.11_ ~ o u J:: 0/) .g .5 "'U; U 0'8 ': e .s 0 ;:I~ ~ .8 ~ U ~ H .0 < ~ Q I. ~ .l5:: !ii ;!~ Q ;;Q Copylight 2002 flOOR FUN Date Project No. 8/28/02 02-02 A-2 . .I'fNDOl'6 "" TRANSOM HNDOI'6 PAII/'ICI) 1RJH TO HATCH l'lINDOI'lS TRlH S1Z1!1$TYL.E TO HATCH exJSTlN6 Tl1"1~ 6AeU!-&D. _ TRIM HDTH TO HATCH EXI5TlN6 . ~ FA5GI.... LoI'ER lRlH I'lIDTH TO BE l' I EAST ELEvATION A-~ SCALE: V8" . 1'.0" Tl1"1~ - EXISTlN6 ROOF VENT Tl1"1~ - EXISTlN6 ROOF lYPI~ - NEl'l ASf'HAI. T SHIN6LE5 TO HATCH EXlSTlN6. 'Tl1".- EXIST.I'llNDOl'6 (jAr> SHIN6LJ:S OYER RI06E VENT lYPI~ - EXlSTlN6 ROoP BE'roNl> lYPI~ - NEl'l A5PHAl.T SHIN6LE5 TO HATc.H EXISTlN6. T'I'PI~ - N&I RAl:E TRIHIO'IIB<HAN6 TO HATGH EXIST. EXTl!IO ROOF CM!R N&I Gl..OSET ADDtTlOIl - F'IOOV'lllE CoOImN.l<llJS Arne, va<l1I..ATlON 'Tl1".- EXIST. I'll_ rrP1(jAl.. - NEl'l SHAKe 51t11N6 - I'IHOU! HClUSe Tl1"1(jAi.. - -4' CORlel ElOARDiS . BOlTOH aose TRIM - I'+lQU! HCU5l!! ElOTTOM ED6E OF SItIIN6 UN!: 6RAr>e - VERI"" IN Flat> ElOlCI!D OUT c.eDAR BEAM ElOlCI!D OUT c.eDAR P'I'1OAHItlAI.: GOI.l.t1N - !lEI! 3/A.." 'INSTALL STOHl! \IEhEBl ON c:otJ.MN BASe 2 NORTI-I ELEvATION A-~ SCALE, 1/8" . 1'-0" 3 SOUTI-I ELEVATION -3 SCALE: 1/8" . 1'-0' ROOF GIOIGI<E!T ElE'T'I'e!N 6AeU!5 TO Al..LOI'l FROPB< WATER DRAINA6e 6 WEST ELEVATION A-3 SCALE: 1/8' . 1'-0" . . THE FOUNDATION Archil.etl / COnJullonl.J P. A. 212 Third Avcnue NOI'tn. Sui" i/6O Mi/lllUlpc1lI.r. MillM.JOIQ j54f)/ phoM. 612.J40.5430 fax. 6J2,J40,Sm 1C81fy'lhI1IhISPIln,Spedftca1icn,cr repOl'lw..prlpateclbymecrlnOlSmy d1rec supervlslon & lI1It 1_. QlIy regia... ~ undttll'll.awsafhllllted ~ ...4...... 011. -.-,;.. Re;. Na. 20803 ~ '" U c: 0.0 '" r:: '0 .~ 'U; "0 "''B ~ s .B '" .,>z:: ::4 .8 " l< " :g A <I/J a h I~ ri ii ~ . :!i ;:;0 CopYt9ht 2002 EXTERIOR B.EV A T10NS Dale Project No. 8/28/02 02-10 A-3 . ~ LIGHTII<; DO FlAN6E ~4) ~;e~~,~,,_;LEV A TION (KITC~EN SIDE) o OU1'ER ED6E OF UPPER GTOP 0 4'-1" RADIUS OUl'ER ED6E OF BASE GAB . 3'-1" RADIUS ~. :;e~v~~,,_;LEVATION (LIVING ROOM SIDE) ~ ~t ;JI~;J UEJE3 III II III III III II DI5HI'lASHER ~4) ~e~/~7~~}EAST) ELEVATION .~ ~B Ra=Rl6EfV,T~ ~ ~~~v~7~".(SOUT~) ELEVATION e e TIlE FOUNDATION . ArehiteCUI COlUultant,s P. A. 212 Third AWIJlIC North, Suite 460 MIMt4pOIU. MinnaDla SS40J p/oDM. 612340.5430 flU. 6J2.340.543J ICer1tyhltlllplll\,specl.calcn,cr NpOf1_. prllllr.dby me<< U'lOl!rmy dIr~suptll'YlSion & I'IIl 11m IdUy r~flerecl~ WlCterll.l~ - MIii A...... DlIe _ Reg. No. 20803 ~ V M ~ CO ~ l~ "0 .5 u I", ...... 13 :8 f ;; ~ ~ ~ jf .8 V oll:!:j ::s ~ Ii;:; ::.:: Q Copy",,'" 2002 MERIOR 8.EVA l10NS Dme 8/28/02 Project No. 02-10 eA-4 NOTE, SEE 3/A-5 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION INFILL 2x4 FRAMIN6 UP TO ROOF NEJ;II BEAM, coNTRAGTOR TO SIZE BEAM,BOL T t HAN6ER CONNECTIONS BASED UPON EXIST. LOADS 4 NEJ;II LOADS. SET ON TRIPLE 2x4 POST., EACH END. SET STL HAN6ER5 INTO EXIST ROOF FRAMIN6 5/8' 6"fP. BD. JillR.AP___ . AROUND "BEAMS" 1f<I/. ~ CORNER BEADS~L I EXIST OYERHAN6 4 . -, EXTERIOR JiIIALL TO BE REMOVED - SEE I/A-2 I EXIST CEILlN6 I I Q;) ~'~~I~"E3EAM DETAIL %' CEDAR PL YI^lOOD t 2x BLOCKING 4x4 STI<lJc..1URAL POST - TREATED '0 I ... 1'-2 15/32' ~ %. CEDAR PL YI^lOOD t 2x BLOCKING Y'lOOD CAP - SLOPED FOR ADEGUA TE Y'lA TER DRAINAGE W . Y'lA TERPROOF MEMBRANE Y'lRAPPEDOVER TOP OF STONE VENEER BASE TREATED 2x4'S W ~. TREATED PL YI^lOOD, 3011 FELT HISTONE VENEER POST BASE '!.rl~ ;;;-~ ! ~ ~Ii ."l' ~ ..... u: s ... LUMN DETAIL I~ ---;;.- --I ASPHALT SHINGLES OVER 30 LB FELT ~/ 40 MIL Y'lATERPROOF'G MEMBRANE MIN. 36" EAVE (BEYOND Y'lALL LINE) ~ 24. EA. Y'lAY, YALLEY PROTECTION 5/e" MIN. ROOF SHEATHING PRE-ENGINEERED SCISSOR TRUSSES 024' OG. - MATCH EXISTING SLOPE OF ROOF R-32 MIN. ROOF INSUL. 5/e" .G"fP. BD. CEILING OYER 6 MIL POLY YAPOR BARRIER VENT PATH INSUL. HOLD-BACK BETY'l. EA. TRUSS FASCIA ~/ DRIP EDGE TO MATCH EXIST. ~ CONTINUOUS VENTED SOFFIT TO MATCH EXISTING Y'lINDOY'l UNIT Y'lRAP MEMBRANE Y'lATERPROOF'G ON SILL DOY'lN OYER TYVEK t UP EACH JAMB 4' EXTERIORI'lALL, €'I I - SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING - TYVEK HOUSEJi'lRAP - 1/2" 0513 SHEATHING - 2x6 Y'lOOD S1UDS ill 16" OG W RIGID INSUL - 6 MIL POL'l" YAPOR BARRIER - 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD 1^100D FLOORING TO MATCH EXIST 112" RIGID EXTRUDED POL'l"STYRENE INSUL. 2x2 TREATED SLEEPERS 0 16'oG YAPOR BARRIER AS REG'D B'l" I^lOQ SILL SEALER 4" REINFORCED CONc.. SLAB PROTECTIVE MEMBRANE 1/2" DIA. ANCHOR BOLTS 0 62" 0. DAMPPROOFING BOTH SIDES OF CMU FDN BOND BEAM ~ No.5 CONT, GRADE-YARIES, YIF. 2' PERIMETER INSUL. e' CMU FOUNDATION Y'lALLS 12'xl6' CONc.. FOOTING w./ 2 - No.4 CONT, t KE'l"Y'lAY. STEP FOOTING DOJ.^jN TO EXISTING BASEMENT FOOTING TO NOT IMPOSE LOAD ON EXI~' ""'- L. 3 TYP WALL SECTION A.S> 5CALE: 112" , ".0" ~ NOTE SET TOP OF CONC. SLAB HEIGHT TO ALLOY'l FOR FLOOR FINISHES TO BE FLUSH Y'lITH TOP OF EXISTING 1^100D FLOO G MFR GRANULAR COMPACTED FILL THE FOUNDATION Archtrects / Consultants P. A. 211 Third A\o'l!'rw~ Nor'lI, Suj,/! 460 MiMeapoll4. MinMJOID 53401 pMM.612,340.543O lax. 6J2,J4I),j4Jl lc:e1fy1hettli1.pllll, sped_calen, Cf I1IPCIl"lwIsprep.r.dby ll'Iecrt.rderrny llIrr.z supvo1l1on & IhIII 1m' G.Iy reg!l1f.,.O ..l!!!!!!E!.... unclerlhel.wIGft-.e....rJ -. ~Reg.NO. 20803 0I1e_ $ '" <J t: OJ) '" t: -0.- .~ Q3 "'''8 ': e ll'" ::I1::'l:: ~ ~ ~~ ~ h ..J:) <.::. .D i" ~ ~~ "'.j ~~ fi ;;0 CI Copyrt,;hl2002 WAll seCTION l DETALS Date 8/28/02 Project No. 02-10 A-5 . ~rrPIGAL - NEJ.1 ASPHALT .. SHINe:.LE5 TO MATGH EXI5TINe:.. - -60XED OUT GEDAR 6EAM .~.. MIN 6EAD OOARD ON PORGH GEIL/Ne:. OOXED OUT CEDAR P'1'RAMIDAL GOLUMN - SEE 3/A-5 IN5TALL STONE VENEER ON GOLUMN 6ASE Q , iQ I WEST ELEVATION -6 SCALE: V8" " 1'.". ~ 28'-"" t- r----- I "I I, ~ I' " I I ... " I I " I r- -------7 I I . ,/ I I I ,/ I I I / , I I / I I L~':",I-_( I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ r. .... Q . 51: U~j,~~~~~~~LA:~ _" . -- OVERHEAD e:.ARAe:.E DOOR THE FOUNDATION ArchitectslColfJultonts P.A. 212 Third ^~nue Nonn. 5uiu 460 Minlleapoli8. Minnaolll 55401 e:.RADE - VERIFY IN FIELD phoM.6J2.J40.54JO fu 612.340.5431 I certfy thai tIIs plan, speaacafCll, ct repan WI' preplll'ed by m. or InIW my d1recf1\lPeNllion& bllem IGJy regl.erecI~ unclerlrl. l.w. or...... of - ............... No....l!!QL 0.11_ Reg. ~ F'RE-ENe.INEERED ROOF TRU55E5 AeoVE 016" OG '" t) ijco "0.5 -in 13 ~"8 ~! ~ ~ !~ ~ Ii :c <.:;. ! J~ ~ .,v lii ;;~ Q LINE OF ROOF AeoVE GONe-RETE 5LA6 ROOF TRUSS SUPPORT eEAM5 Cep"",.'2002 PROPOSED GARAGe PLAN &. a.EV ATION Date 8/28/02 Project No. 02-10 ~-6 . . , . . . He wwu<ci.golden-valley. mn. us Y 11-8-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 3114 Orchard Avenue North Daniel and Debbie Kubes. Applicants Daniel and Debbie Kubes, with property at 3114 Orchard Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct an entryway addition to the front of the existing home. This addition requires the following variance from the building setback requirements: . Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The requested variances are for 4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 31 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Orchard Avenue North for the proposed entrywayaddition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, November 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. '\ ., ..... . 2140 Kelly Drive 02-9-59 . George and Helen Peterson . . . . Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax) alley To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2140 Kelly Drive (02-9-59) George and Helen Peterson, Applicants Date: November 20, 2002 At the September 24, 2002 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting, George and Helen Peterson, with property located at 2140 Kelly Drive, requested variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants had approached the City to build a new garage, workshop, mudroom, deck, and bedroom and bathroom addition onto the existing home. These additions required variances from the building setback requirements in the front yard of the property. At the BZA meeting, the applicants were asked to revise their site plans to reduce the number of front yard variances. Attached are these revised plans. The following is the new requested variance: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance requested is for 9 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 26 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Kelly Drive for the proposed room addition. Attached for your review is the packet of information that you received at the September 24th meeting. . . M:!lIA:Ia liO.B: ::I ::I ::I ^8 Z# u6!S80 e6BJBE) \lBlS P~E IIBM JO~8lX3 UOlld!J:>saa l.ZtSS 'NW 'Aan8^ uaPIO~ 9A!JO A1I9}1 at ~z UOSJ9l9d U919H ~ 96Joa~ r:: ~ ~ Ji ~ .., .. ~ .~ e .!! ca UJ Co ca oc"5~~ .ohlC I ,...on I r-Y--"~-=l ~ 1 ~:11 ~ ''; oIIIle-." ZOlZOI~ a .^"~ ZOIE ~ .^"~ r-I .ZOIW8 a .",,~ 91ea '^a~ M &'" 0 ~o 0 N o g ~ a:: t;> ~ F :> ~ z .. ~J -< ll!= ~ -< If Ie. (!)~ ~~ ~ -'" 1m UlZ .,::;; ~~~ C).!l!jl 013 . ~.ll~ gIAml liO.! :l u u6!S90 ZOlZOl~ a'l\lI~ :l e6eJeEl RIllS P~& ZO/f.'lI ::> .^"~ N :l neM JO!J9lX3 ZOI8Z19 8''<f!~ ...... ,(8 uond!Josea elea '^e~ G) 0 Ole') as.. 0 0.0 lZtSS 'NIN '~alle^ uaploD N 0 aA!JO ~lIa)l Ot ~Z 0 I-) 'C uOSJaJad ualaH ~ a6JOaD Gl ~ .~ e.!! ~ co Cl)Q. as It: Ci~~~ ~ .. <l .e ~ ii o c: .!!! i Ji ~ S] cog ('\') Zu.. . M:!IIA:nI 1I0.![ :I Z# ufl!sea ZOIZOI~ a'^a~ :I a6eJe€) ue4S P~E ZOIEZI O'A9~ ('i) :I I"'M JopalX3 ZOIllZ/9 a'A9~ ,{8 UOlld!Y.lseo e~eo '^e~ Ql 0><') ~'15 \ \ \ \ \ ,. \ 6,<:5 \./" \ \ ,. ~,<:5 ('V \ ,. \ \ ...r~l,6 ,'-...... 'l- '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,/ 1\~r;) ~,\) \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \, , , \ \ '\ \ \ i)~ ~'" lIlZ ~~'" i .!ilil oJll~ ldu ~w:::i L~t9S 'HIN ',{8118^ U8PIO~ 8AIJC ,{1I8}1 Ot~~ UOSJ8J8d U818H ~ 86J08~ \ \ \ \ / '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / '\ . en / Z / o ...../ E / Cl / Cl II <( / Cl I W I (/) I 0 I 0- I 0 I c::: , 0- I , I 'en .' f- I Z I W I :2 I W , c::: I 5 I 0 , W I c::: , ~ I U I <( I co f- I W I en -o-.Ot I 1 I (: " I ~ I I / I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \,,',' .9 l?J L L -o-.Ot J \ \ ~\ ?,S'-O~ \ \ \ \ \ \ , ,( " '\ .0. ~ .6t '~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ).' , \ \ \ \ \ 'C II caEiQ) ~':l~~ oo<((/) o rI o o N o I-) :> Ql 0:: ~ Ql Q. e Q. c: o '0 .e B ..2 <II 1 en f- Z W ::?; W c::: 5 o W c::: ~ U <( co f- W en " (/) f- Z W ::?; W c::: :5 o W c::: ~ U <( co f- W en Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals September 24, 2002 Page 4 . d porch at its . Se ted that this is a problem 10 applican utting in a tandem with other additl in the area an respectful to their nel or. .2140 Kelly Drive (02-9-59) Geor e and Helen Peterson A Request: b . 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . · 17 .8 feet off th ed 35 feet to a distance of 17.2 feet for the proposed nd mudroom at its closest point to the front yard property Iy Drive. · 14.4 fee required 35 feet to a distance of 20.6 feet forthe pro at its closest point to the front yard property line alon e. · the required 35 feet to a distance of 28 feet for the proposed "tion at its closest point to the front yard property line along ve. feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25.3 feet for the posed room addition at its closest point to the front yard property ine along Kelly Drive. Purpose: To allow for the construction of several additions to the existing home. Olson stated that the applicants want to build a new garage, workshop, mudroom, deck, bedroom and bathroom addition onto their existing home. All of which require variances. . Pentel asked if the existing garage would be used for something else. Olson stated he believed the applicants were going to use the existing garage space for a workshop. 4 . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals September 24, 2002 Page 5 . McCracken-Hunt asked if the proposed new garage were a double garage, instead of the triple garage being proposed would it still need variances. Olson stated that building a double garage instead of a triple would be three feet further away from the property line but that the applicants would still need several variances. Helen Peterson told the Board she has another plan that would move the third stall of the garage back so it would line up with the variances in the front ould look and function better. She stated that the lot is pie shaped and that th t about building up but the foundation would need a lot of work and g uld require a lot of re-plumbing. She said that the addition would help w' Cera stated that he thinks requested are too much. lot but that she would be added that she does granted variance d questioned what d that they would e thinks that her additions Cera explained that the Board needs to find some sort that would be in this case. Peterson stated it's a pie sh have nowhere else to build the additions. She ad~ would enhance the area. . Pentel stated that she doesn't think the odd s encroachment into the front yard setba noticeably different from the other ho back doesn't really change much b addition. n this case really justifies the ated that the additions would be I-de-sac and that pushing the garage ould be the least seen part of the and the amount of the variances being - unt stated that she realizes it is an odd. shaped mfortable seeing encroachments to the back. She osed front porch and that the Board has in the past es. e request and having the applicants come back with with no third stall or a deeper garage. Peters instead suggested a they had thought about building the addition to the side yard t but there is a room underneath that would get blocked. Sell applicant extend the basement under the addition area. MOVED by Pentel, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to table this request to allow the applicant time to redesign their plans. . .Cle Yard Setbacks Request: Waiver f wwm~~Mm_Mtt~ Y 11-6-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 2140 Kelly Drive Georae and Helen Peterson, Applicants Recently, George and Helen Peterson, with property located. at 2140 Kelly Drive, had petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct a new garage, workshop, mudroom, deck, and bedroom and bathroom attached to the front of the existing home. At the September 24, 2002 Board or Zoning Appeals meeting, the Board requested that the applicants revise their plans to reduce the number of variances requested. The following is the new requested variance: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance requested is for 9 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 26 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Kelly Drive for the proposed room addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, November 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2140 Kelly Drive (02-9-59) George and Helen Peterson, Applicants Date: September 18, 2002 George and Helen Peterson, with property located at 2140 Kelly Drive, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21 ). The applicants have approached the City to build a new garage, workshop, mudroom, deck, and bedroom and bathroom addition onto the existing home. These additions require variances from the building setback requirements. The following are the requested variances: . The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for 17.8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 17.2 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Kelly Drive for the proposed workshop and mudroom addition; for 14.4 off of the required 35 feet to a distance at its closest point of 20.6 for the proposed garage along Kelly Drive; for 7 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance at its closest point to the front yard property line along Kelly Drive to a distance of 28 feet for the proposed deck addition; and for 9.7 off of the required 35 feet to a distance at its closest point of 25.3 for the proposed room addition at it closest point to the property line along Kelly Drive. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in December of 1967 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . . Subject Property: 2140 Kelly Drive George and Helen Peterson, Applicants . =-0 h,. ~Z ill" }O "iQbl i:~ ~:;'t ~~ % ..."".tl. ':;. I :1~ ~ <>"',' i I '11 ! '~ ')/.7 !cUI I /.. ~-: 200 "^' ~~;: 12 . ,:! 0 18 ~ Sl ....... '&. .. .. w..f - - - - -5;',"-- --- --- --- .." :1-~~. !:~\!- "'r~s II w"f H'," I"" . 13 I'''' tHe I~," ,~ #:J,OI : It!' I t: ;;:1- II .....; 10,~1": 9 ~l~ . :.QI~ ~, ,~ 1 I I I .:. : 6S6l): 2%i 69.<>' I '4 7 H'1 . .. 100 1140 A."E!:OOE6fl --;;;S-14lI . --'Jo.'3- .,..,. .. 7/Dl ht>.#fr ... 10 lVelt ---- --4sifu ------- . . I I I ~ Ct ~ ~. ~ ~ 00' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C(;: ::::l ~ ~~ ~ 9 '7 Well ofl7.SS .. ::: :0: ... 8 w"l 5{;',17 4 :s~';... ;...-=--:: \"~ 'i. 2"." 100 \ 3 .: _ _ _ _ _ _ _J I o' PART ,EY . I'" ,L..i -../ :"if. ~ J..::. . ~l ~ !l~"-t; . . i> . :;: t; .. .. .. ,.,. ~ fa"'06 """'.1' "',8' t! LISL+I, ISO I 1;0 "'Z.74 . '" ~ '" C) '" Oo:l 4 " " Z '" - I (f)" 3 H ... ..... -'" ~I"" 21- 1;'" .~... 0::.. IJJ~ ". >i ~I ~ . . . . . (Revised 1/9~) Petition Number tJ ~ - 'f -$1#_ Date Received ~ I ~ I 0 ~ . Amount Received SO. 0> ($50 residential- $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: ;;< I LlQJicl/ d '\) ~ 2. BZA Petition Date (..-,o\dc.YI V ~llC~ rY\ () 3. Petitioner. G, ~1A~C oV\d \~c.-b~ Name ~ \ q 0 \'< e-Ll:::r tx Address (~D\deV\ Va-I\CM ;i\n ~7 Gity/StatelZip ~ 1 L.3. ;)O'K- I d ~<j? Home Phone -p ~T,r--~ ~\r1. Business Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): LOT , f13\ol:...l~ "3 1/eCc>la~ wIldwood E<:.:t:a:tt:.<; 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: xSingle Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling I nd ustrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other ~ , . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s}, and alteration(s} involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. ~u .~.. ~D~ ~ A .~ ~ ..~ ~+cr 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s}. Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ ,5'0. ()O representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. g . . iLJQ~ Signa ure of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. -. " . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Plea:se be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice ofthe Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name {hflr'$~ Comment ~~ A:&cle- Signature f!jJ/iriL aJnlt Print Name /fl.. &1" f M. ~ :lp~ Is ,; Comment hoc> K-$ i.U~~ Address 11-r; ~tt.; Signature~~~ Address ,9/l>')-*-1 /:)".. Signatur Print Name (1ane.;t ~Sbendif Comment Signature ~~ Address ~ /35 i(tng fJ"., . Print Name ~~~~y~{t ~ -- W't~SW " . Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment: ,fl., Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . . . . To the Members of the Zoning Board We are requesting a variance in order to make the current property more livable. We feel these additions will not only make our home more livable, but will increase its value, and make it more attractive and competitive with new housing stock. Re: The additions to the garage portion of the house. I. The addition of a third garage bay will provide shelter for our truck, as well giving us room for a snow~blower, lawnmower and a variety of other typical homeowner items. 2. By moving the current garage forward, we will be able to provide a workshop on the ground floor. This workshop will be insulated and heated, and will allow George to work on the wooden furniture and cabinets. 3. The design will include a much needed back door and mudroom entrance, which the current house does not have. At this time, the only entrance into the house in by way of the front door. Re: The additions to the private area of the house. 1. Adding 10 feet to the private area will enable us to have a much more livable master bedroom, as well as providing space for a master bath, a large closet, and a first floor laundry space. 2. This same addition will provide an entrance foyer, and help us develop a usable deck between garage and the bedroom additions. We are including a landscape plan which we are following, although the landscape was developed prior to the additions of the bedroom addition. We have already installed a very attractive fence and arbor and have developed the landscape area next to the fence on the south side. Weare also including a picture from a magazine to give you an idea of the total overall impression for which we are striving. We would love to give the current little 60's rambler the style and livability that would make the next family desire to live in Golden Valley instead of some of the newer areas of the suburbs. If you have any questions prior to the meeting on Sept. 24, please feel free to contact either us or our designer/builder Sass Construction. Thank you for your consideration. SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka. MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 Fax (952) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: GEORGE PETERSON SURVEYED: June, 2002 DRAFTED: June 10,2002 REVISED: July 24, 2002 to show addition. REVISED: September 3, 2002 to show addition. adjustment. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 3, De Colas Wildwood Estates, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK: I. Showip.g the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal. description. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, ifnecessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important. 3. Setting new monuments or verifYing old monuments to mark the corners of the property. 4. While we show proposed improvements to your property, we not as familiar with your plans as you are nor are we as familiar with the requirements of governmental agencies as their employees are. We suggest that you review the survey to confirm that the proposals are what you intend and submit the survey to such governmental agencies as may have jurisdiction over your project to gain their approvals if you can. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " . " Denotes 112" ill pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, unlesr otherwise noted. \ I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or \ under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and \ Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. @.." 11 (Q^~O^ am s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 / ./ // ",,0 /< <3" / '''::;0 , , / / ./ f\G8 " 1'18 01f1 Ill' ,rJ' I / I I k" 0" " ,":Jo73,~ '" /' 6()() ~<:J \ \ \ \ \ 7' ./' ~ --j- Dwg. No. 020581 I G: :---. : I h: I \41--J I L____ . QZD = 0 ~ ~.. i 5 = II:: ~ Q olI -t:! ;I ~ !:g e iil U1.~~", .. 0 ~.2lil i ~ Cl~~ Q :l! ~.ll~ . . M.~I^ml "tIo.a: :I~ A8 ReM JO!J'llX3 UO!ldlDSaO LZt99 'NW '~alle^ uaplOf) aA!JQ ~lIa)l at ~Z uOSJalad ualaH '8 a6Joaf) lii o b ;:. .n ~ ." .. i~eJ!! caCf) D.ca '-lDOou 00<(00 1 i 1 , ~ , ~ it ) I ., lIiit ;:- I J Il n ~ J D ~ ~ _I 11 ; ~ 9 ~ ; , . t ) U / I , i Ii I I l I It II .\ - 11 : i: I ~ 5 i .......... L._, ~ I ,q /.~'.. 1~..LI :(~)7 ~ ~ u ) I " /. , l1' L. .. L__J ...~." I m~" I I t. _ ....... rl WIllZ/9 8 .'V~ a.eo '^e~ 1""'t 8,.... 0 ~o 0 N o co I-) :> .. a:: . . 3D Overviews Not to Scale Foundation walls not shown for clarity s~ ss construct_on._nc REMODELING & RESTORATION 160 George Strest Iml Excelsior, MN 55331 II - Lie, #3505 c ..... o N t!! ~ S II) :;; CI) - r_' 0.. Z .... c CI) :iE H CI) > - > 'G)"C >- ::tC~ .~ -.III >- ca ~=> &~ c ~ ~ 0 CI) 0 o~:E Ilq CI) ''t- 0 C)NC) Drawn Design Approved I dil~ Scale c: !~ ~ I Q)!'" 10 ~ o III 'I'" 6) -t' 0:: 0:: Rev, 8 I Page 2 ~ J02001 . . . . . . . . . . wwmd.goUm_vlt~ Y 9-6-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 2140 Kelly Drive Georae and Helen Peterson. Applicants George and Helen Peterson, with property located at 2140 Kelly Drive, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appealsfor variances from the Residential zoning district.. The applicants are proposing to construct a new garage, workshop, mudroom, deck, and bedroom and bathroom attached to the front of the existing home. These additions require variances from building setback requirements. The following are the requested variances: . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for. 17.8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 17.2 feet at its closest point to the front yard property line along Kelly Drive for the proposed workshop and mudroom addition; for 14.4 off of the required 35 feet to a distance at its closest point of 20.6 for the proposed garage along Kelly Drive; for 7 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance at its closest point to the front yard property line along Kelly Drive to a distance of 28 feet for the proposed deck addition; and for 9.7 off of the required 35 feet to a distance at its closest point of 25.3 for the proposed room addition at it closest point to the property line along Kelly Drive. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, September 24,2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. '" . . . 9015 Elgin Place 02-11-68 Paula and Michael Watkins See Large Size Plans and/or Survey in Planning Department . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 9015 Elgin Place (02-11-68) Paula and Michael Watkins, Applicants Date: November 20, 2002 Paula and Michael Watkins, with property located at 9015 Elgin Place, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a room and deck addition to the rear of existing home. This addition requires a variance from building setback requirements. Also,a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback requirements. The following are the requested variances: . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The requested variance is for 9.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25.5 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Elgin Place for the existing home. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(8) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined the rear setback requirement to be 16 feet for any structure to the rear year property line. The requested variance is for 9.5 feet off the required 16 feet to a distance of 6.5 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed room addition and deck. Previously, this property received a variance. In May of 1980, the BZA approved a variance for a rear yard deck to be located to a distance of 9 feet to the property line. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. Since the current variance request is to replace the deck to a closer distance to the rear yard property line than was previously granted, the applicant is required to request a new variance. A review of the plat for this property shows a 5-foot drainage and utility easement along the rear yard property line. Therefore, the proposed deck would not be located in the easement area. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in November of 1968 for the construction of the home No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 9015 Elgin Place Paula and Michael Watkins, Applicants . I I 21 f ,I"Y'; i ~Sn'l 14 . rNl.1f . G~. , ,"IV~-i>: / / ~ 4(, '0 .,q 4tq . . (Revised 1/9~). Petition Number b 3- " I' - " a Date Received 11/5/0)" Amount Received So ,()I) ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: q()/5 15-lglVl Place, )J~ 2. BZA Petition Date N6VeVYl ber zt, I 1-.DeJ 2- f 3. Petitioner: :Pau~ M'lct1~~IVl.~ Nameq D 15 · I0 di IVI r la c,e- A1 DYl11 GrJl:;t~ v' a!~/MtJ Address ZJ City/StatelZip 5SL{;'2- '1 (elz..-2--LD-'1781 . 7107:J-5'-15-3ee7 . Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: . 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Lor 1} Bto~ 2- Me DDU~~ I' - Juri? AM,t1~ 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: X Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other .' ." . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. 8. . . :[h;J; reh-hOvl lMch,tcte~ t\ r~ ut~.for t.\ \/tt-YlaVlCe.- -b rel2lace OitA'" CUWi . . btUt- ttWt.w~ thva-~ pYD~ &W\ll~ VOOYY\e-xfGvl~~l\V1d cte&-~kN\SI t'6 ~ \}'.\et,r 0\~ * tt.t-e- hou~. w;~ tlte~) upMkd .p1'O~ ?u.we~ we (Staff will complete this item) cure.- ~ltn> ~~h~ &\ VCLV'lO.,VlCO foiM\G ~\:;,h ~ 1wt.t Waiver of Section Subd(s). UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or tlardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 50 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~Nt,~ Signature of Applicant . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This. includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Signa~~.a ~/<J Address y}:;k::J 7)/JL.L/7# ~. ~~ (/AZ-u-CY; JI'1;.j..c-C <.,?27 Print Name Ji/a..J--'l~r- //arl an I Comment Signature /~t/~ Address 9rJ2.rE/r)~ ;0/ . v ~ I/attv /YJ/V S-S-V.2? -.....,- . Print Name -J 1Yh. Comment ----...-- -<.. 7 Gro b.\IA/\ ...... Signature 2)-- '1:5^ PrintName il /; p IC~'y/o) I Comment Address <}ool ~1.V\ PIau..., jJ ~ Vcd~ 55427 rJ1krt1~~ Address 9~30 ...Dt:?~-rA >r- //&k;';,~ i4//t7Yr /J1V SS-</-Y Signature . . November 5, 2002 PclnwnfurilidmaooeWIDv~ City of Golden Valley Board of Zonfug Appeals Supplemental document, item #9 RE: 9015 EIgm Place North Before we purchased this home m the fall of 1997 we had an inspection done that revealed the deck on the back, north side of the house was not up to current safety standards. Per the mspector's report, the deck had not been properly attached to the house, the lumber had not been properly treated, and the beams and joist tops were rottmg. The condnion of the deck has worsened and is mcreasmgly unsafe. Removal and replacement of this deck has become our top home mamtenance priority. The last survey on record with the City of Golden Valley for the property located at 9015 EIgm Place North was completed on Apri130, 1980 and ftled related to a variance request for a proposed back deck by one of the former homeowners. With the enclosed updated survey, and our petition for a proposed expansion to our current family room and deck extension, we are also requesting a variance for the existing house. We appreciate your thoughtful consideration of our petition and variance request and look forward to reviewfug our petition with the Board of Zonfug Appeals on November 26, 2002. Respectfully submttted, ~~ Paula Watkins Tn\~~ \}j~. Michael Watkfus . . . . Board of Zoning Appeals May 13, 1980 Page li ing house is placed at an angle on the lot and the proposed not be any than what now exists. The required 201 separation house and the detac age would be maintained. Mahlon Swedberg moved to , noting in doing so, that corner lots with the 35' setback most cases, an inherent handi- cap for any further construction e motion was seconded by Art Flannagan. During d' Ion on the motion, Mike Se that the minutes reflect that the re ouse to garage separation be retained an pro- posed struc I I not be beyond the line of the existing house at its close poi ormandy Place. Upon vote, motion to approve carried unanimously. 80-5-17 (Map 19) Residential 9015 Elgin Place Thomas M. Rootness The petition is for waiver of Section 3.07(2) of the Zoning Code, rear setback, for 91 off the required rear setback to a distance of 91 from the rear lot line to the proposed deck at its closest point. Mr. and Mrs. Rootness were present; consent had been obtained from all adjacent property owners. No others were present to be heard on this proposal. Mr. Rootness explained the proposed deck at the rear of his house. The Board noted the configuration of his Jot which was wide but a minimum in depth and Jot lines that were angled both front and back. Mahlon Swedberg called attention to the low profile of this deck, that it was designed to parallel the angled lot line and that it was not asignlficant intrusion into the required yard area. Upon further discussion of alternatives, Mahlon Swedberg moved to approve the deck as proposed. It was seconded by Art Flannagan and, upon vote, motion carried unani- mously. (Map 18) Industrial oulevard The petition is 7.051 of the Zoning Co areas, for required 351 yard requJ t alo Avenue to a yard area of 151 Present for the meeting was Mr. adjacent property owners had b All This request is f bui Iding and area on the east side of Louisiana Avenue at W Boulevard. This is the former service station which was recently grant aiver of the moratorium to allow construction of a temporary addition . . . . . . . . WWW"igoUm_olt~ Y 11-8-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 9015 Elgin Place Paula and Michael Watkins, Applicants Paula and Michael Watkins, with property at 9015 Elgin Place, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct a room and deck addition to the rear of the existing home. This addition requires a variance from building setback requirements. Also, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback requirements. The following are the requested variances: . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The requested variance is for 9.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25.5 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Elgin Place for the existing home. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined the rear setback requirement to be 16 feet for any structur~ to the rear year property line. The requested variance is for 9.5 feet off the required 16 feet to a distance of 6.5 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed room addition and deck. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, November 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . ". , . 2485 Regent Avenue North 02-11-69 . Sandy and Mark Bartel . .. . alley Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/ 763-593-8109 (fax) To: From: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Pla-nner Subject: 2485 Regent Avenue North (02-11-69) Sandy and Mark Bartel, Applicants Date: November 20,2002 . Sandy and Mark Bartel, with property located at 2485 Regent Avenue North, are requesting a variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a room addition to the rear of the existing home. The room and garage additions meet building setback requirements. However, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meeting building setback requirements. The applicants have signed a "Hold Harmless" agreement so that they can proceed with their building project. The following is the requested variance: · The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The requested variances are for .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Regent Avenue North for the existing home. · The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for .7 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.3 feet at it closest point to the south side yard property line for the existing home. As can be seen on the survey, a shed exists just west of the rear yard property line. This shed is owned by the applicants and is located in the City's Briarwood Bird Sanctuary. As a condition of approval of the above variance requests, staff requests the following: . 1. Before a final building inspection is completed, the shed in the Briarwood Bird Sanctuary be moved to conform with the City's requirements for accessory buildings. This shed shall not be placed in the floodplain area of the property. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in April of 1960 for the construction of the home No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 2485 Regent Avenue N Sandy and Mark Bartel, Applicants !J.~ .! . "'f-i4' us : ~/: -)5 ... . ~.... ): ....~:t . . J ! t~.a ~'l; F '/~. . s '''U' 'w. k " -' ~I 11,"" _ ~ii/;: I~'~, . 115 ,..",' E~t.F5",~7tt~'1' - - - - --:::.?.r .1 ~ ,- l:Ib'~, ,I~ .~ _ .. , So t'....~ . ~ G...~ 'P ~. :<6~' \~ ~ ~~.~.~~ ~ I ~ 't~,...: ,:-;.~1I. . 6\\lV Ii .J JS. IU.?~"~b--:;;;~..:- ".,,~"'~ .t::r.~,..~<..'j opo'>)''-..... ~T~:t-~~. 2-::h" 7l: ".:: - ~~. "~i:: - .'~ ~~;r. ";:-:J~~'" ~ ~ -"a..~'" 10 ..... ~ .1#'''__ 1'-.11"" ._ C\i ....1.. "'06 u., "d..'- ....." ~..a ,'"_, -:: ,. ~ ,. r. :I..... I ~i~~-~ 3-~i~~ii: ~ ~ ti;~~i:<~9~~Ji r~ ~6~ · ~ '" "''''/U.. /)1./' -- , ~,,~. 1Z7."..... lil ,"~~..... ~ UL.. : ~ ~ 0 ! 12-~ 4-~~~;~."")!'f14:~~~ ~1"';''t.,~ School Dlst No 24 I ,~MEI ;, "':ce :t.. : -,~. ~.,.~ ~ t'!i ...~.1t...: _ ,;. ,... Ii..' lZI/ .. -,..;,-10' _ ;:0 II ~ It ~., ~ ~,! .. ~... '2. I.... ~ ,~"!", . ",., -r'6 i:.; ::;.~ ~ . .. v ~ .& 9...~1',.~1J .... ~.~ ~I.~. . I" '" ..~s '.. II ... s_ 't == ~.:; -... "".~ >'.. 7 ,! 5."'u~'w f" In ~lfl'" - - Co 5 <II 0::: a.. . . ~.tJ 'l1 ..,,, <( F.1 ".... = 0: . ....~ IZt7i 1/_ ,.. 1/. 1>1.1$' I '" ,,;> -.f. .IO~ C . :-:'. " .:~ w--""-~ ~ \L '" 'i r.. ;I~6..; -..,...........-'.. OJ~,~:~8 't Q.~ 69; .;; 4.' , =, 2~' I~" }3 Inu.n7 ',,,-,,,,iti l':; I'S'lZ It" ~ 6 rl -.. BS,11.-- ~. 6. :; ~ ~ Z',,! '.I'l'~. - . = .. = .' .;- ~ :~: ... :1.....,.. _ ~ ilt 2. '~/ft,% .c. :--;e ..~$ft;l"'41' ~l' ~U':f IZ1US ....~4' '0- liD ,~ Il~ - 4640 . :&7 ~;~~~'!!.~ 9. ~.. ..1,41 ..~~~~ Roll.' 4680 4840 jQ 4800 4780 4740 4700 . ~ ""7.0) i' ~..u-'!':.~.., 14 :'! .. ~l r"" ~~~(bll",,",' 48.5 .~ DRIVE .: '. ,ill.,.., ,A,' ,...n \" ., 7. .. r 4 , I '\ C;RF.1:." 4'" "7~5 e.., ...~. ...~B4SSETT.. ' - ~l . i-n'." 9" 30 \ t' ,'~' .. I ,-.SJ ...~ Jut 100 I I H ,,,. ~ _ :..~ ~.~~' '~':I 4911\6.4.....' 11.1'- :~: I I I ~ <., \\." 8.~,,"/ . ~'''':,-11 ooo~~".. " ..~J>;\ \:,/;" ~ .4i" III f'1{'.~: 5: . I~: ' >;~ ~ t", "~,, ,,~I:-:~ <~~ '....'at' ~ . IV. ~ \~ti9\ ~ 8 ~ :~lJ';" ~I 4 s: ~ ~ 2 ~ I ~ ~2~'N.5'D~ '1' ~...~ ,- ~Ft~' ", 10.'J.O} \!:.... 7 "/\>,"'6 .~ tIAN::' "'l 1 1- ~"i. 9 ~:, -.~ ',.". .. .~.. 0-" ... '.' .:l \11 .: 1 I ,4' ~)JI, ,.".i'':J..... " Il,"'" ..;,t..... II h,./', ." 1 I. ,'1<"" L~ ~ ltf{.:o...; . ..6- .". ~C) ~L '-- 'A.ri~.4J"~ 00.'5"-. 44,4" St.&~'U~ ftlj "'~-%.'1 : _ \..~..:<3 '12 ~... CIT,..., <4U>I<K IlAUJr !J.I''/.~~ Z,',5"" 14#" .' -;;' ',:;1 J~ 101<. ... j~ IYh <l~~ t OUTLOT Vi No. j // J - ~ )?,::.,,~ ~"f ~ '$~'ZL. .!jl~ "", ?J~:~ 1"5 IU..'$4'44'4. Ilfl.fJ ~ _~ i ~* " 8 j5,00A tI'l:' ~ -" ..114" ~ /75 IJ_ J /44 ~A~ z'" \ '. .....--. 'O,~ 46,r....3.t.14~- ~ ~);'7il.~.,.'s.. "./3/41>>--.. !;. I \:"'~~ '~ -.1/ ",. ~~,,~~I r: w' 'W() # 21. ":. 2: ~ : if! 18 '" ..~. "';,o~ l"J', "I'~~ !i~ ~ ~ \~ ..~~ \~ ~~36J /, 9,0 4S00 4.60 . ~ 17~' ,. 2.;~:. I ,~~'IO~ "Qo! A. !Ii ~~ ~/~.. 'Q.\\ 1000.fit. 51./ "~iI: ~ ~\Jl~ ---? ~. ;= '~cI1P . C)IMARKAy"~....."t!.~ 1&'.' (;:)! . l,t ." C:~!I.' ~', ~ 22 _ ~ :.' Vi I_ '. /,.4j _ ~6~ '., ..... !l ~. \1 .e ,. , '~ ... ~ ~ '$~'_.~ j 17.8 1"5 :~~/1:~~f!/ 1fe.?D . ," .... .....:.. ~ ~., '. ~. ...= .B.~ft '''':1.:~ " ~ t~Q '" v...~.-: ~48~5:""-e ~.1 IZOos "'9", p' .~:3 51 ~I L~"'.i1..~ - ~ ~~~ ,,/ ,dl. ,II ';'" 'm._ . - . j;~. /...~. '" OJ.. · .JZ5..' I' ~.!-c.~ ~ +. ~,.. " :--:" -Qr- --~ ~roJ . 0 . _ .""b ~_ :_-bd;:~&.'i8_ 19 :.$ V. '" - · Q 23 . ~ ;: ;!::: _!: '44 s. '\,,:t:r. ~~i.;;'!i~'" l 4." 1';-, \\" ~z.: : t....'U I ~ Uc t'\,j "" : 0 ~:::t ... 11(., . ~i;'" be. ' fit.! oJ I,'fl. ; ~.J tI .. a. ~4D - 2 Jl:l ~ .... 'ItS,ellS ,..: ~';;?( =: I; i,Z',S4 ...., ".",'\',\: & .. · - .~).! ~._. - It "1 ~ . _ I i ./'~~._A B"~H.' ~"~. 140 2 I .'Ii - ,. ~$1' .-~~;:!'D. I; a~_'~'~.'6 -" 30!~,;!~.:., 8h,} .~~14_' s_,~:.~ ..y. to, ~ Vc;... . " ... <(~ ~. W> 'HJJ!"" <.; 1~" C e'" .~ 33 : 25'.~~~! .15 ~ \ G "'0 .~ 13. .... 1(1~ i, ,J. ~. ~ ~ ~ tit a. = 4.: ';';.3 :! 2 ~~ <( ... 6., ~(Q ~_ ~Q, \;' r/# UI'l1 ......, .. '4_ '" ti .. _..M4 "~"-,,_ t. ... /'/," - f-5' ~,. . . '''OJ'' _ 3 ; ~! 4_~ S'~ 320,4 26 ~~,~g .146..... ...'1;; ."'~. 3~' '~12_ ."--1ill'- ~ ,=t . . ::f/!fJjjY;';~~J ~~ (j~.giil .!~~,~2 ~ ... ..:! I. "~:',~~"~l/ "'.~ ..~~' ..:- .,t;~~~~,'J~~f,,~ ~ 6~",~~~g~~'~!..;.11 _:: ';lj,!,. :'.~:,:~~.O~.4~ ~. ,"''''';' '" .. ~~'" ". ~ 13S a: IZ~ I<~ "I;.... ,~ . ~~.--'-- ,2 -.1 - ~~ Q I~... 1'$I.:i- _ 0 ,10 9 /p. ~ ~..x ~.~ "<,'" -. ~ ~.. 30 . 2~.~. ~ a~: -Ii' .:: ""'b ~.. 5..~ ~t,'~"'J4' ~ ..",./o,..\t":Fj~"~J .~ \, So 111.1< ""5 ",....i!i' ''Ii a -.7..'.' <: >'J;ii. I,: ... ;;;- So r'ts.-I T<15., j;l. ~ ~~. ~ E!:l> lit ~"l"J.' iJf; ---;., , I4z ~ "" '('f.:' :Y.. '''I 10 . L'- 1>4.3 'N i... y /_ 2100 ~.. ~9$>'%...1 ~;.iTzZ' u..'....:::J2:. ~ ~ .. h... ",7. ......... ' ;"t... . , 2 TY Tl . . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0 1- -II - ~ 'q Date Received IIlt/l>?-- Amount Received SO. OJ ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: ?L\~ 'Re~e~~ f\ ve \Jcv~ BZA Petition Date \ \ ,.... L\ - O~ ~av\&'-(r- (\~O\v \C ~v ~-€- \ Nam~_\\ ~~ 'R ~ t '" +- 1\ ~ \J l Go \ck VI\[" 1I1"1lV\ t--l Address City/State/Zip SSl1L L ,,",ut<.. lnl:l- 3-1d>-~"1~~ 'l ~ ~-s-;;)d--,-~'-tK - Business Phone Home Phone 2. 3. Petitioner: 4. PClX '(2-J7~ ,7787 If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: ~.~- 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): 1 \ o-\-- L\ ~ luc k- L\ ~UJ,^, vicY-e) '"). \NJ Acbi\'-h ifvJ \-\ e V\ \AO \;t V\ (0 4 v'\- i-, M .~ V\ ~ CI -\c\ , 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: 'i Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial J nstitutionaJ Bus. & Prof. Office . Other ~ . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. 12oov\/"\ 'CAdd'l~ 0 f--f- \0 CA-C L (\N-es-\-<) '-~0 0 f- s\ de + \{'eC/\.r VLV\AQ..:k rS del VlC;-\- e Le€cl S lctP -T- V'e<A V Se '10 CAe \c') 0 Lo + L ~ V\.k'S 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposec:l surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared ~y a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needect, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $, 5D.()O representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. o , ~ ~l/V\(J;~ ',' Signature of App lcant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. ~ . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application' for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Signature ~ &1 fj;:i A<;jdress Z '-16 D ~ A-\llt- ND- Signatu~.Jc,p~~ ~dress 25oS~,'4 Ch A Print Name Comment Signature Address 1 . ". it ~~ !q( ~! ! ': .,. .;/ j:: :>1 ... .... fl t/ Sf '~l ' .. ~ ...~ I , ".. "..,~'" ~ :7. l,)Z -Jtf 1,9 r ~... 'II .....,. I '" ... !II...... f) ... }1.l.. tI" t/I- ..... ,.. " 0" ~l ,,'" \..J .....,. . ..""l'''' ....,~... ~ '~I i...! . :4 , I~:.~ .c., ,," '4. ..~. ! +-' 4. ~,. " ..,? ...' DA'W I HU~ tJLf U":' CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (MEASUREMENTS SHOWN IN FEET AND DECIMALS OF A Foon o 20 I L--"I SC^LE IN FEEl "^LK0Ln' · 842.5 '-2:505 ORIVe"AY ~,. ....~ " ..,,') " N 89054140"E q~ t-c'125.00 ~ ~~> '''ot \ , Q o o ~ .... -t-~~ct .> "8.) ~ .." . " 21.' " ..... ..<0' G "R. ~~ OR1ve,,^y 0 ..... ..~'). eO Iti ~ ~ ~ "2485 I-S-F . :lJ'-00R . &so.s 0 n ('If eO ClOT. '*.. ~ ., ....~... ~ ",....,. ., 3".7t It) ...... 0 0." It) -+ ....~ 30.7 CIJ " " " "1~ 14.J* < " .I.t- , 125.00 :+-"f: ~" S 89054'40"W "~" ..) .. ..,,\. . "246=:1 "'AlKAA · 8411 Iff: (" ACRES 2ND ADDITION. HENNEf ,- . .. .;, 1" .~- to- - . j .. -. I . w""" .... -........ .....- -..- ......... . ........ ............................-........................................;........................ -.... ... .. . ...... - . . ?'--\ f;~ \\ eC1 eV\+ ,~~ W Street Address "HOLD HARMLESS' I.~'I\J -r &. <'+ I . am reques~nlllhe City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) .0 ctd \t "- cF'v1 onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am.doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. ~< City of Golden Valley ,4Atti!. CXIH~S Staff Signature Vir. tPflw...I1""J-rP~ ~ 30\V\d'i &,-k I p~J.~ Signature \ \ - L\ -OL . Date . . . . . . . . . ~d~Mmlt~y 11-11-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 2485 Regent Avenue North Sandy and Mark Bartel. Applicants Sandy and Mark Bartel, with property at 2485 Regent Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct a room addition to the rear of the existing home. This addition meets building setback requirements. However, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback requirements. The following are the requested variances: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The requested variances are for .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Regent Avenue North for the existing home. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements,: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for .7 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.3 feet at it closest point to the south side yard property line for the existing home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, November 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. " " " .. . 2560 Kyle Avenue North 02-11-70 . Gary Hansen . . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2560 Kyle Avenue North (02-11-70) Gary Hansen, Applicant Date: November 20, 2002 Gary Hansen, representing George and Leni Wilcox with property located at 2560 Kyle Avenue North, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a room and deck addition to the existing home. With the exception of the proposed deck on the north side of the home, the building additions meet building setback requirements. The following is the requested variance: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 10 feet at it closest point to the north side yard . property line for the proposed deck. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in October of 1976 for the construction of the home No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 2560 Kyle Avenue N Gary Hansen, Applicant 4 " lo\~'-t,\ .. :~~ 5 . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0)..,. J 1- 7 0 Date Received J I J ~ J D/- , Amount Received~ 5c..~. ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 25ton k,/ Lf AVE N. 2. BZA Petition Date l Y 5 10 'Z. 3. Petitioner: b-AR-Y \-\1\"'S~N W / Hl\tJS'E-tJ ~I'v\.ET~\-\ tuG. Name 7Cfzo K~~R t3L:l>. r.O "'Box l(X')q LHf\,vNfflSlJI MIJ 55? l? Address City/State/Zip Cj5Z-"'Cf3~-b~s, qS2.-qCfo-'l7~3 Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: bO~f: a L~.., \ W \\"'L(')X- 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): I, " T Rf\GT ~ 1< Eb. l..t\r-Jb c, lJ ~\i '1:'1 $;: l "2.. 9 g . . 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: )( Single Family ~ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial : Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. Tg'IE1\~ \')~~ \}..:l \\\-t 'S""'G'I~~ l<.~l...(~ "t9J -po:5T FOoTlN6S. 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. ifin question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ '50 ,eorepresenting the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~~ ? ~O~~ Signature 0 pplicant . UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. ~~I~O/~~~~ ~O.~~ :J'-l~-:J~~-~O~~ rl-ll.:l!:. ~~ FROM : THERMAL DEUlCES INC FAX NO. : 6125884450 ..'~~' ~uv~ ~~;~w ~~4 ~J~ ~VUJ . . . Nov. 05 2082 08:36PM P2 I"l.\\Z l:.Il.I The applicant win need to obtain the signatures of alls.djaC@Otproperty owners. This,includes an properties abuttCng the app\ioan1'~ propeftj and dlreetly across the str~t If on i4 comer. this means acrose both streets. t.<<m: TO ADJACeNT PROPERTY OWNERS: . This pe'tttlon is apPlication for Waiver of Ordinance{s) of th~ City Zqning Code. PI~~~e be aware of any possib~e'effect thegtanti.ng of this walVerCOtlIc1 have on your property. All properly owners adjacent to the subject property . will receive. a notice, of the Boord of Zoning APpeals hearing, at which they may present their vieW'S. Your,signature is required only to verify that you have been told about fuerequest and gIVes the adjacent property owne~ apportWlity to comment., ,.'. ,. . . (Comments ~n :Coribilllanguage of agreeing with the prbjec:t..objecting to th. -project or other statemen1a regardIn9 the project) " . . PrinlNarne 9 h'j r J e..y /VI. Me. L o,uq)J!, ~ ' Comment No cfc. o'""j;1e ~ I J I . , . .. Slgn~"~e.;,'P, ~o.....~.oo Ry/(. hk .N.. t{ ~_.. . C<:?/oIc:. r^I Val/~/ MN ''I'-<.:a. Pr.int Name ;:Jo -If ~ ~ /He l.. 4-lf. G fI. G-I ~. Comment sJgn~.I3"Lf ~piJ-"ddrm ~60~ ~r"c: 4vGAJ ' ,~ '~ G.:fclc.J "'""lley M~ f'sy<< Print Narne~l'" l, . S ,. 'E, D ~ A h J y .i<.... , ' .T::" J L Comment.-'f: I '^ e..- . ,Si9nam~.~~ o~ Addre~;Z~D/J1kAJ~L0 _ , ~~~'d--~I-l'-bl - Slgnaw", J(aM.V; (ttrth Address 2.'5~ ~ 'f - . I' . Hardship for the property at 2560 Kyle Ave North. Owners propose a deck attached to a conforming addition that they would like to encroach five feet into the 15 foot side yard setback. A variance is felt to be necessary for the following reasons: 1) The extra five feet creates a more usable structure 2) Allows for an entrance to the north side of addition 3) Because lot line is angled, it creates a hardship to design a conforming deck. 4) A dense line of trees on the property line will provide ample privacy for neighboring homeowners. 5) The existing dwelling is on approx. 32 pilings up to 35 ft. deep, due to poor ground conditions. My Customer will be paying for "screw jacks" foundations supports to ensure the proper foundation and to comply with the City of Golden Valley Codes for both the new addition and the new deck addition. ThankYOU,. n \~. ..7- ~ . J3'1j . ADVANCE MlVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 WLonka. MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 79~ Fa. (952) 474 82~7 ~ I SURVEY FOR: HANSEN HOMETECH, INC. Ll... SURVEYED: November, 2002 DRAFTED: November IS, 2002 LEGAL DESCRIPTIO)!' Trl<ll A, Roai..ered Land Su,,'''}' No. 1298, Hennepin County, Minnesola. LIMIT A TIONS &. NOTES: I. Showing Ihelength and direction of boundary line. of the abo"e legal description. The scope of .. out ser.;ees doesl!l!!. include determin;n, ",tlal you OWII, which is a leaa' mailer. Please che.k the D leaaJ description wilh your record. or consult wilh compelenl 'eaa' tOllnsel, if necessary, to make \I surelhat il is t_I, and thai any mailers of reco/d, such u euemen/I, !hili you wish shown on the D SIln'e)',llave blleIl sOO,,1\. I 2. ShOVlms thelo.alion of existing imptOvements w. deemed importenl. t J. Selling new lllOIIumonts or verifying old monuments to mark the comers ofllle property. .. 4. Showing ele.ations on lhe site al selecled 'oclllion. to give some indication oflhetopography of t Ih. site. The elevlllions shown relat. only to lhe benchmark ptOvided on this su"'ey, Use thai bcnchmark 8/Id cheek al'easI one other (elllote shown on tile map when determining olher elevarions for use on this ,ile. \II S. We make no representation lIlallhe easement shown is in ./Tecl. () DOS11NO 1 n STANDARD SYMBOLS &. CONVENTIONS: OWEWNO o .0 ....... ,no ,....... .~;'.... ........ "... N~" .m. ... OOl _ otherv.isenoled. Ii)')')' ".J'''''),'/'''/),),), I3U J bcrel>y ecr/i(y wt IbiJ P.... sptdfiulioD, JOpOJ1 01 ....ey .... psepuod by me 01 1lIlder my cr..... llIptl'\Wo. and WI I om . Ilcnsed Prnressi"",,1 Eogineer and ProfeaslOllAl Sun-.yot!Pler the Iowe of the S..... ofMiMtlCllA. x.... xu.a . - c-I__tw__ ..,., 111M .",..... _...-. ,,., .".", ,. .. - .... 0ilI' ., - -, S 89';11'.1'- W - \ --29309$-- .. " -~-\.-----r-- ----'---~. .. Ii .. 'S. -~ ~" .. 1O x.&' ... J) >> ) J " >> J o )1 J: C .. II :l... " ;) I t....~h \ ~I I \ I \ XMa )(13M XII1" r;-- , , x~J JII )(M.' ~ ~ ... ;) J ;) ., ... XNIA r" ~"L' f' ";~' , OWEUJtlO X'Ou .. ) ;) I \ _ ...a...- - -\- \ l!l - --216-58-- S 8721'52- W .. l2 .""." ..;;.---:. -=- ~ .. .. .. .. I I _ -L - - ~ -....~ ... ... GRAPHIC SCALE ~~~ T (_..) .. I I .../ .. " n ... .. . .. .. .. ".. .. I~ ~I , ICI) .. I .. .. .. Dwg. No. 021430 ',., :01 E\ '-' I.A... Dolled line is ..1. II. the existing I ;I /1 house P' {. . 1 If, I I I I f: I,Nl': i ,': I I . "" "~ ~ ~DP'*" -7: 1 /[; 'T · ,JGI<J<.vJ '"" g / "'~ )" // b. t ,._,Ne . / ~_/"{S I ~ ' M . ..Z-' I ~~ 7lt"i, , i"I(/ 'rrt" -- . . .... .' - . i~'" . ,..Iov,".c ! o . " A' A" ., ~ 0' . ,. / "y .., 5. ..,- \' I ",,,,,,., ,\, . \,. ..! ' · ,2'" < . .1 ,~'. '" ,'> I . ,I .>ce.~w. .' ' er ",;.-' fC .......... ; . ~ I I' / . I ' P"""" . I ,I, ' /.,' ,,' \ ,. I' ,0-...--- <.,.. ".' J1 Phone: 95~~934-0854 · I... I 1/4" 'n.\, IS Ij..J', IA...- p~)fb(~~ BE v'.Jr/,,"p,. \).l-E\t_t.~. ~ DECK 't,i.J1,1.:D. =--~r:'I'V\ ;' Cl.-t\\L'v{ H.t''', N S IE N "2') ~"'ecl'E ( ,~ ' .......,.,...... / / (;:)D~q ",......-/ senhometech.com · 7920 Kerber Boulevard · P.O. Box 1009 · CJUnhas~en, MN 55317 b :i , C "1 ,r.. k' ';if: /'17 " .J; ";r c:.1 ~ ~ I '\ f ! i 'I I II ~ .' ~ UP j 6'\6 i'\1m,l't'SS ~.' George & Elainy WilcoxJ2560 Kyle Ave N "Wilcox 8a" (-:::\<::, ....."t:>t':j>,j V f\l...L.{ . (NbT 'T'O '2.<:,,1'\ (_~....) 71M1:l1/A" . . . . . . . . . . wwmd.pUm~vll~ Y 11-15-02 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 2560 Kyle Avenue North Gary Hansen, Applicants Gary Hansen, representing George and Leni Wilcox with property located at 2560 Kyle Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a room and deck addition to the north side of the existing home. The following is the requested variance: · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code. states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or more, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 10 feet at it closest point to the north side yard property line for the proposed deck. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, November 26, 2002, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification.