01-23-01 BZA Agenda
Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, January 23, 2001
7pm
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chambers
I. Approval of Minutes - December 19,2000
II. The Petitions are:
905 - 965 Decatur Avenue North (Map 21) (01-1-1)
Everest Connections. Applicant .
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 7 (A) and (B) Loading and Parking Requirements
. To reduce the parking requirements for this office/warehouse from 232 required
parking spaces to 180 parking spaces.
Purpose:
To allow for the construction of a satellite dish farm, which reduces the number of parking
spaces on the property.
235 Louisiana Avenue South (Map 18) (01-1-2)
Gree Brink. Applicant
Request:
Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks
. 3 feet off the required 14.75 feet to a distance of 11.75 feet for the proposed deck addition
at its closest point to the north side yard property line.
Purpose:
To allow for the construction of a deck addition onto the north side of the existing home.
III. Other Business
Discussion of re-appointment of BZA Members
IV. Adjournment
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
Tuesday, December 19, 2000
· A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appears was held on Tuesday. December
19,2000, at the Brookview Community Center, 200 Brookview Parkway, Golden Valley, Minnesota
Chair Bob Lang called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
Those present were: Chair Lang, Members Sell, Swedberg, McCracken-Hunt, and Planning
Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were Staff Liaison Mark Grimes arid Recording
Secretary Lisa Wittman
Purpose:
the approval of the
I. Approval of Minutes - November 28, 2000
MOVED by Swedberg, seconded by Sell and motion carried
November 28, 2000 minutes as submitted.
II. The Petitions are:
801 Parkview Terrace (Map 9) {OO-1
Ga B ant- Wolf
Request:
Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback
e
d 35 feet to a distance of 23 feet for the proposed
losest point to the front yard property line.
nstruction of a porch addition on the front of the existing
Chair Lang read the r
backyard. The ex
from the prope
ariance. Grimes stated this property doesn't have much of a
is 20' from the property line and this new addition would be 23'
new addition won't extend further than the garage.
Swedberg a
ryant-Wolf why he thinks this porch addition is necessary.
Mr. Bryant-Wolf stated he would like a foyer entrance to the house. Currently, people do not know
there is a front door to the house and now use the service door next to the garage. He also stated
adding this addition would be an improvement and add value to the house.
Chair Lang asked Mr. Bryant-Wolf if he had any more plans. Mr. Bryant-Wolf showed a more
detailed drawing indicating where he would like to put the addition and showing the existing front
door is hard to notice.
_ Sell asked Mr. Bryant-Wolf if the structure would have a hipped or gabled roof on it. Mr. Bryant-
- Wolf stated it would have a gabled roof.
Swedberg asked if the addition would be covered. Grimes stated it would be a covered, heated
addition.
Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals
December 19, 2000
Page 2
e
McCracken-Hunt asked if there would be an overhang and mentioned she was thinking 30" on the
street side.
Sell asked if Bryant-Wolf would have any problems making the overhang any bigger, but that 30"
is the limit. Mr. Bryant-Wolf stated 30" would be fine. He is also putting in columns along the fornt
of the addition for aesthetics, not for support.
III.
roten (Mr. Bryant-
es if the permit
'foot. Grimes stated
e would have to be
ing obviously tacked on.
Shaffer asked if the columns would be full columns, or just half pil
Wolfs builder) stated they would be full columns. McCraken-H
would require more detail because the dimension could vary
that variances go from the wall or base of the footing. Shaffe
footings under these columns. Sell stated he didn't wa
Mr. Bryant-Wolf stated it would be congruent with the
McCracken-Hunt stated the house has no street p
no backyard and Mr. Bryant-Wolf has made v
stated the backyard is wetland. Shaffer stat
d it's close to the street and there is
e rovements. Grimes agreed and
allenging, but it will balance the house.
MOVED by Sell to grant the variance f
Setback to 22 feet for the proposed
line. (The original request was to
one foot to allow for the column
r from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard
at it's closest point to the front yard property
the front property line. The Board allowed an extra
.n front of the wall.)
e
THE MOTION was second
variance.
cken-Hunt and was carried unanimously to approve the
None
IV.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M.
Bob Lang, Chair
Mark Grimes, Staff Liaison
e
e
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
From:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
905 - 965 Decatur Avenue North (Map 21) (01-1-1)
Everest Connections, Applicant
Date:
January 16, 2001
Everest Connections, with property located at 905 - 965 Decatur Avenue North, is requesting a variance from
the Industrial zoning code (Section 11.36). The applicant is requesting a variance from the parking
requirements. This variance would allow the applicant to construct a satellite dish farm on several parking
spaces on the site. This would reduce the existing parking spaces.
..This property had previously received one variance. In November, 1968, the property owner received a
.variance to build a loading dock along the street side of the building. The minutes from that meeting are
attached for your review.
The following is the current requested variance:
· The requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.36, Subd. 7 (A) and (B), which relate to parking
requirements. Based on the office square footage of 11,500 square feet, and the warehouse square
footage of 93,000 the total number of required parking spaces is 232. The site currently provides for
146 spaces. After the construction of the satellite dish farm, the applicant will reduce the number of
spaces where the satellite dishes will be constructed, but will also be adding some spaces on other areas
of the property. As a result, the site will have 180 parking spaces. Therefore, the applicant is applying
for a variance to reduce the parking requirement of232 parking spaces to 180 parking spaces. If the
satellite dish farm is removed at some point, the applicant has agreed to provide parking spaces in that
location. They believe that after these parking spaces are installed, the number of spaces on the site
would be 216.
City Staff recommends approval of the variance with the following condition:
· If the satellite dish farm is removed by the applicant, parking will be provided where the satellites were
located. This would bring the total number of parking spaces to 216.
..The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in February of 1969 for the construction of the
.building. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
See Large Size Plans and/or Survey in
Planning Department
Subject Property: 905 - 965 Decatur Ave N
Everest Connections, Applicant
>= ~
3:
:c 'll-
~
~
:r: '"
....
:)
0
N:E
C\J ~
. lL
0:::
.', , ;D" I
\!H H~~ I ro
" .', L' ~,
--'
t-:
..-til.-
rf)
<.5
l.!J
(1) >-
....
0
.~"/~'" ,'\./' / / ^
~').,'l.' 4 \",'>/. /~~.
~9 ~)..\"" / I .~.~.~r. .'~ /
oP'.'1 / ~y.. 5 ~~'V
cl'd! / /' !>I'.;-:q
'1:,0 ,/. / ~.~.,:,> ..,. 587"8'07"# 400.62
"'''00 / / .. 6 / 14t.1
~ / /
"'00/ /
/
/
/
~~,
$"',..:1
.....
.-..
..
V)
part of lof
5
:.."'0 ,
<"'..,..:
~"'o
:"S-.,.
7
.
9000'
9
4.7./0
S/4ND4RD
~
0(
..
..
.
2
~~
~2
1 .
11
..
OIL
3rd
/.l DD,
.
en
::)
720.2
801..41
S.".-.JS'Z'-P.
770
."
.,
~
:z
0
H
E-<
()
(zl
~)
I .:':'. .,~1
\ rl
.J
c
a\~~ PEM I MILLWORI<
.. @~. PAr-lT (i!'" "RA CT I
.s.u.,s/l'U'i!,
it) , 458.8.$ r..;."
,.>18.66' Nal"''' ?~.M'
;, - -iJ~ -- --~~-=-- :;....;"'0.'00:.;.;.;,;;-.
;11I__ _ __ ~~l>'-'
,m.' I
~ . '0'
ItVl. !lc.1\ itlt. iij
Coo. I
,~
~
~
~I~
"'
~
I.i
0:: \'"
::) ...
~ ;!!
(,) N
I.LI
o
II
L ,(
.;'~'~1. ,
S21.113
u.i
~
~
I .
..
"'~
":
...
AI
'l:\;;'
, ..
~ ~.
..
~
4
,'::-..>~,,:,..
r: ..: :~ :::~~ t' l :..:.....: '.': : 1'-.;:...... r\ ..-.~.
TH'S oLAT IS CCMPllEO Fl('''l~~ .. ..: O(St:i1~?'
" ;:~ -,:.r C01.:1.r!r i\;.l.ji,\,.l;(~. i'f\.(
1.U
-Hr.o..
\N €oS" \J'\€o~
zcus
I
\.,
t;
I:l
I
I
I
3
2
:)1 C€oN"\"€o~
9<
"
"
.
_ ~1
.~~
..
I;;
,'" ....:. I
I'~ O'V~=~
. "<? ~ '"
\~ i~ 6 I ftI
-, "
.
5
l:;
i!!
1~ /'I"'4lli~ :1-
-F-- 20e ~I'"
I 4 ::;
I
o
...
I~ zoo ." ':
.. "1-
.:to ~.,;
",'^
"'
588
--r' ~
.1_TH_ _ _AVE.__
21S _
.
,
B.O
~
~ 9.s.u
"" ~
-...' (3210)
7"'/~ _
~ (1ZlD)
......
I:'
474#
~O.Dl ,/ i..?'
~."31'tz"W ",-". \
~r=i
...... Z62C'.S9 (C.5./969)........
"-
, ~,,:-.
e
e
e
...
N
...
~
..
:!
"
~
...
~
.:
>
0.1""
5
2
"88'Z2'/G"W 376.! 8
U4.1'Z. 17~,'3
I
I .
I...
~
1 ~!~
... I
'::1
z,..~
",,"43',5"C 5'
3
"8840-880,
e
e
nEC-13-2000 13:45
5938109 P.02/05
CITY OF GOLDEN UALLEY
(Revised 1/99)
Petition Number 0 I - 1-
Date Received I! J J I) I
Amount Received -Q> J" (), 0 0
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition;
905-965 Decatur Avenue North
2. BZA Petition Date
January 2, 2001
3. Petitioner: Everest Connections C'./o ~nswersl Jnc.
Name
450 Weidman Road St. Louis, MO 63011
Address
(636) 386-6707
Business Phone
City/statelZip
Home Phone
, 4. If petitioner is not owner of aU property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
e
Continental Develooment- Everest Connections is a 10 year tenant
5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
Lot 1, Block 4, Golden Valley Industrial Park
6. Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: _ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial 1L Commercial
Institutional
Bus. & Prof. Office
Other
.DEC-13-2000 13:45
CITY OF GOLDEN UALLEY
5938109 P.03/05
7.
Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition~..'-
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
(See Attached Sheet)
.:
e
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver, Attach/etter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current 01:. usable survey of tl)e property: must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptil.blll. The suryJIX must be ~t\!pal'Qd b~ a ~i'"
tared land surveyor Ii.censed in the state of Minne ota. ThQ :-urve~ must
show all pa!perty lines, builqjnqs. and stree~, T~dls1an:~";, the j,';;use
and all other bUildings to the (rant and side prop~_ lines ___II b_ shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be Jleede!l.
if in questlQn. Also, th~ I.lU'l/:ey should show ari approXi;w.: I~cati~n=;;t Il~Y
llullqinas on a<\Jqcent propertil!.S relatj'tB to the Sl~~ v;:e _ the C;K=c:zon will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17", th_1Lplicant will_~pl_seven
additiQnal copies of the survey for use by the Board.
e
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 150.00 representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
.~~
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF
GRANTED. IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES.
t
e
7.
.
e
e
The alteration requested in this petition is in regards to the total parking spaces required.
Due to the placement of a satellite farm on the site, 60+ parking spaces are being deleted.
By actual occupancy count by the tenant this does not present a problem.
..
[VEREST~
e
5555 Winghaven Blvd. O'FaUon, Missouri 63366 · 636-625w5700 . www.everestgt.com
RE: EVEREST CONNECTIONS
905-965 oeCA TUR
GOLDEN VALLEY, MN
January 2.2001
Dear Sir:
At the recommendation of our attorney and infrastructure design implementation team I
wanted to relay the following information for your consideration in pursuant of permit.
request filed on November 9,2000. However, prior t-o getting into the details of this
specific site I wanted to provide a brief overview of Everest and its potential impact on
the City of Golden Valley..
Everest Connections a new full service cable telev.ision, Internet and communications
provider that is expanding to Golden Valley. Ultimately our company will have over 400
total employees at multiple locations serving customers to approximately 1.5 minion.
homes. Our financial commitment to our market build will exceed $15 million with over
$10 million being invested over the next 3-year period.
In order to accomplish the above goals we need to begin work on our primary
warehouse and cable head end facilities located at 905 -965 Decatur, After reviewing
multiple locations in the area this site was determined to best suit not only our
technology needs but also our warehousing needs since both these funcUons are the
cornerstone of our community rollout. This facility, which Everest is leasing, is
composed of 105,000 sq. ft. with over 93,000 sq. ft. dedicated to warehouse function
and 11,500 sq. ft. dedicated to office. The building is located on approximately 6.152-
acre site with 146 existing striped parking stalls. The service yard at the building rear is
served by a decommissioned rail spur and is not currently striped for parking. Everest
proposes placing a satellite dish farm over approximately 1/2 of this rear service area
with the balance of the space being resurfaced and striped for additional parking. The
additional parking will increase the total parking to 180 .spaces. This number agrees with
the total requirement referenced by Mark Grimes of the City of Golden Valley per his
interpretation of ordinance Subdivision 7 Loading and Parking Requirements in his
conversation with our attorney last week.
e
Everest and it's outside plant contractor, Spalj Construction will have employment at this
faCility as follows: Spa~ warehousing staff 20, Spalj office staff 3, EverestWarenousing
staff 25, and Everest Office Staff 50. This staff count in conjunction with 1:0 visitor
spaces make for total required parking of 108 thus parking surplus will be 72 spaces.
Everest Connections
Golden Valley, MN
Page 2
,.
"
e
.
e
e
.'
[VEREST~
5555 Winghaven Blvd. O'Fallon, Missouri 63366 . 636-625-5700 . www.everestgtcom
At such time as Everest would relocate from this facility and the building released for
rent to a new tenant the satellite dishes will be removed and the dish farm reclaimed for'
additional parking. This action will add an additional 36 spaces bringing the total parking
to 216. This should address any future concerns on the availability of parking in the
event the future tenant has a higher employee count than EverestlSpalj. Since Everest
has executed a 10-year lease we do not anticipate any changes prior to that time In the
event a change in the, user group does Occur we would of course investigate additional:
parking options available at that time to insure any concerns by Golden Valley are
addressed.
To summarize the Everest commitment, staffing levels will not exceed those indicated
without a user group modification and proper sUbmission of plans for permit. Everest will
remove the'satellite dish farm 'upon vacating ,the premises and install additional parking.
I hope that wHh these commitments in place that the initial permit can be released for the
exterior work and; that we can proceed with development of the site. The final package
on the interior improvements will be submitted later for permit.
Sincerely,
Ronald J Lusk
Director 'CO Systems
Everest Connections
Ii
"
BOARD OF ZtWING APPEALS
November 12, 1968
page ;;
4. for 10 R 02 -rnd[cap'~ to. a side yard landscaped area of
Ot off the out property line. (Required 10e landscapj.ng)
S. tor 108 of J.andacapini to a real' yard landscaped area of
on off the west propert:r l:il1e. (Required 108 landscaping)
Section 1.03. Lot ot Record. 1..'1. all of the zoning districts,
every building-r1er~ter erected or structur.slly .alt.ered
shall be located on a separate lot 014 parcel o:f record, and
in no ease shall there be more than one (1) p14ineipal building
on any crae such lot or parcel.. The words "principal buildL"'lgfl
Bha.]J. be given their common ordinEU.";r meaning, and in the case
ot d01..lbt or in any question of interpretation, the matter
shall be referred to the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals.
.
6.
Mr. Eugene Day appeared barol's the Board and presented the request. They
plan to remove the old garage-type ahedsthat were present when they MOVed
in five years ago.
1'he Board. noted that other requests in this area have come before thamJl and
the proponents. have tried to comply more favol~ab1y with the code. It 'Was
felt in this request that an upgrading of the propm"ty through aesthetics
would coincide mOl-e to other pareels 'Which the Board bas ruled on in this
area. Thane parcels are >730 Wayza.ta Boulevard and 900 Turners Crossroad So..
The Beard. ga.ve particular attention to the East pratian of' this property
along Xenia Avenue. It was .felt by ~he Board the petitioner should comply
more wi t.ti. the Ordinance.
e
MOVED b.Y HOQver, seconded by amah, carried unariimously to deny the proponentoa
request.
(Alternate. Stredberg arrived at I'fl.eating 9:45 P .M..)
68-ll.~ ~~.... Wynnwooq_R~4 J~) ~ld.J:_ Schel!n~~
The petiti~ is for the waiver ot Se~tion j
3.07...(1) for )0 of an ~~~ !!!-i~e~s:!. to a front yard setbac~ of
328 off the Nor'th pl'opert;y lL'le. (Required 350 for b1ulding)
3..07",,(1) for 88 of a F-rC!~?!.!!! tlaub!! 1W~ to a. :front yard setback of
218 of~ the Wor"Gtt pr~pel"~ 1 e. (Required 358 reI" buildi..7lg)
Mr. Scheunemann presented pictures shcrll1ing the proposed garage and breezewa;y- *
MOV~D by Hoover, seconded by Bruch, ca1"l~ied unaninloosly to allow the petitiOl'ler
at 6125 "W;y:mrorood Road to construct his Pl"oposed addition, so tlu;,rl< his front
yard setback \1-:111 not exceed the front yard setback of the closer of the t't-ro
houses adjacen"l; to this parcel, Which are 610S v~ood RO.ad and 2380 Oolorado
Avenue, 5.S measured from the North IM"'operty line 0 Also, the Bu.n1"d directed 'r.he
lil'lgineering Department of Golden Valley to v~i.:f'y the Bhol"'~er dist&"1ce f!'CJtrL
the 11or'fIh propel"'GY line to the existing st.:n:tcrbtu'es. -
~~J 93~ lJacatm:~~-"!~. (lli._Pl:!!~~l\Yan C~t~.C",- .
Tl1e petition .is for the waiver of Section
7.05S "In no case sha.ll loading or unloading bertha or W.~as be situated
on the street side of' a~' building. ff (Erlsting off Decatur Ave.)
t
.
e
e
BOARD OF ZClUNG APPEALS
November 12, 1968
page 6
Bob Branny of Premier Realty and Jim R3ran of Ryan Construction COlllpaDY were
present to explain the request to the Board.. The proponents stated the loading
dock vill be screened .from the street, and thai's will be landscaping through
out the parking areas.
Tbe Board noted that this parcel is a eorner lot which has st-L'eet frontage o..'"'!
two aides" a spur track on the West side, and the building designed for i\1.ture
expansion t.o the South.
MOVED by Bruch, that they approve the waiver of t.l1e Ordinance and that l,l.dditional
considera'tion be given to extenaive green area treat,n;.ent. };!oticn failed for
want of a second.
HOVEn by Swedberg that the request bs denied.. Motion fai.led for 'Want of a
second.
MOVED by Hoover J seconded by Brn:ch, that the Board of Zoning Appea1a at:cep.t
the petit1one~(Is request for the waiver wit..lJ the s"t;ipnlation that m.ar.lmu.J.'l
.foliage be planted in the landsc.aped a.reas with particular emphasis 00 the
area sereel'!:L1Jg' the loading berth. ao that the loa.ding area lu"Ul not show from
the street. '!'he sizeo:! the foliage wUl be afe. height that w.ll provide
soreening now for the loading area arid. retain its foliage thi-E:mghout the seasontD.
change. It was .further stated by the Board that green islands be interspersed
in the parking lot to break up the sea or bJ.B.cktop. All members "!!roted in
favor of the motion e..~cept Alternate Mahlon S't~dberg, who abstained. 1'he motion
carried.
There be:ing no further business the maatirt{;; adjourned at 11:20 P.M.
~umrpr.t)'tem. Abderson-' ,
~secietaryJOn we;tIaIte - ----.
1-5-01
I
.
HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zoning Appeals
905 - 965 Decatur Avenue North
Everest Connections
Everest Connections, with property located at 905 - 965 Decatur
Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning
Appeals for a variance from the Industrial zoning district. The applicant
is proposing to build a satellite dish farm on the property, which would
reduce the available number of parking spaces on the property. The
construction requires a variance from the following section of City Code.
· The requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.36,
Subd. 7 (A) and (B), which relates to parking requirements. The
applicant would like to reduce the parking requirement of 232
parking spaces to 180 parking spaces so that a satellite dish farm _
can be installed on the property. _
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday,
January 23,2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers,
7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota.
Adjacent properties require notification.
e
l
.
e
e
Hey
Memorandum
Planning
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
To:
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
From:
Dan Olson, City Planner
Subject:
235 Louisiana Avenue South (Map 18) (01-1-2)
Greg Brink, Applicant
Date:
January 16, 2001
Greg Brink, with property. located at 235 Louisiana Avenue South, is requesting a variance from the
Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a deck onto
the north side of the existing home.
· The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code
states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be
governed by the following requirement: in the case of lots having a width between 70 and 100 feet,
the side yard setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for 3 feet off the
required 14.75 feet to a distance of 11.75 feet on the north side for the proposed deck.
The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in December of 1976 for the
construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file.
\\i
l\:
~
:;;;
~
.
l'l.t7t..~
"-'
~
~
~
~
",\ A... ~v 0
:.\ $"S"'$E
'"
~I O~ c,f.
'"
~I
I
"" ..J~ f:J~ O~
"" - ~\
. ...
~ ~I ~~ ,,0
I .
I f:Jf. .
"" ,.,
"" I J ,. ~,~,,".' S
..... "3m
~Y./
:--
'" ~ 0;
"'
~ ..
~\O 0- k-
.. ! ~
..,
i;; ~
~\ ... <f)
.. .."
.. ~ Q
't~ ..
l:l ~
. ~ e
JI..&c.,r.1 ~/G
~
..
~
..
..
~
'"
...
""
e
00
~
<
=
=
=
...
G')
'S
c:>
~....
I(') =
~ =
N ~
...
-
.. c..
n c.. --
1:..< .... 'Sij)J 24'\1
~ "' '1
c:>~
- =
~ ...
.... -
~=
.20 ~
,Q~
= -
me
""
""
.....
~
...
...
'"
~
.
~;c.
~
4!L
~
~
~
.~
Q
\.
~
~ ~
':: ...
.
.
(\I,
q' 10.
(\j
....
lq
lq
ll..
t)1'-
t)
t\j
r\;'
\..:....
".
co
i-'"
~
t ~!~\\~~ ~)f lit;
.., .,
;;;
.. ....
'"
Ii ~
~09
~".i
0.1
r<)
"
c5
i: i
(})
:t:
~
~
.....
::
~
.. ~
~
'>!.
!l!
-ti
.....
'.
lq
.....
"'t
(..)
(/')
<I'
t;
<>
e
\,
i
..
~.
~
...
')l;
.~
..
~
-;;;
'"
~
.;,
~
~
$.
~
>-
lLI
..J
..J
--
(Revised 1/99)
e
Petition Number 1)/- J ~ ")....
Date Received
,/ SlOt
Amount Received If, so. 00
($50 residential - $150 other)
PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
1. Street address of property involved in this petition:
2Jj Lc....u.~6-~G\ I+velt\./A.. St~ I &-clJt", Utt.t~.7 ( MH :Jf42 &.
2. BZA Petition Date
3. Petitioner:
& ~G- 'f J'trN fi '7 7SjUMK
N~.?j- [o,,\urt1~6. ~z i,a.-...Jt,,- ( l~...l/( MJ./ J('fl,b
Address ,r p ':7 ......, 1 7'h i J 2 CiwlState/Zip
I~]- ,j 0 2-- 0 L l.> /II::''>-U l: (0'- ~ l.T
Business Phone Home Phone
e
4.
If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property
owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property:
5.
Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey):
4+ l ( ft DC K 5 ,lLl ~ )" Cot D ~r~ t' \7..,..~ ..IJ-& J\J-:--l)~
6.
Type of property involved in this petition:
Residential: 'j:..' Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling
Industrial
Commercial
Institutional
Bus. & Prof. Office
e Other
7.
Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition.
The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any
variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building
permit issued.
.
b .e ..-fC-
O~
^ /\A j'.f1frL. () f. h t' V\ te
o ~" ",..a J -<I '"
6eJClJ f) Lr, {t7IY1 UJer' 'fe-&C-1Jt' 0 \
off-
8. (Staff will complete this item)
Waiver of Section
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Subd(s).
Waiver of Section
Waiver of Section
9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which
provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or
other evidence, if appropriate.
10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed
surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- _
tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must .
show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house
and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown.
The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed,
if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any
buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will
take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the ap~licant will supply seven
additional copies of the survey for use by the Board.
11. To the Applicant:
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and.
correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ SO\lV representing the
Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee.
SignatUre of Applicant
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF _
GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. .
The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes
all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this
means across both streets.
.
NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of
Ordinance(s)of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of
this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property
will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their
views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and
gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment.
'\ ",,----
(Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or
other statements regarding the project.)
/- '+/1 I
, . I , /
/ ':n:"-1"" j l (J'. L.
I __ V I .. "~ ?
_.- .'
Print Name ,,' =-;--\.f GfJ/)
Comment
e
/.1
A /1 4 1//1
Signature /"'~7t:./<:!;/t2zCt;:I?J/ Address 2-10 1-0(...0>'4'-,,> ,T~--e.J
/ -.' < (..... .
\" ~~\ h"...> 3f;,v-i do:'"~: .:^ :J'IJt.. ,So. c1c
Print Name J (;, 't1 ~, J.. ~
Comment (.k t-' .1... ./.... '" f..; I ,t( ." ,........, Fe.!'/
( {
Signature
/1 i'1. -~ - _
It.'d' \J /' \1
''''~'-'f/'z:.-.~
~ j:' -
(
Address
'") .., J
-'- :> i I::-...."'-..""t... c: ; l.
I
. 1..", s
Print Name .!\ LI..>.ltl ''Ju
Comment
/ ...,.., "
\ . I i.
:f~J'
,,' I
.
)
Signature..
.</ .' \. !
Y''x,' -'::/:'-"'," '-il
_ \.-.l......u... ~-.;:. ..
\ rl
. ~J}i:Jdj-'~? 0/7/ck
?K.
Address ",,:'!jC . Il~"J ri.~~ Ie.'
(
,
,:/(;/
.::"
-r;J:::J.
Print Name
Comment
25:5' LOt:.'l../5/cu'/(<,4'vt. '> .
e
~,.I \'_ _,1/1
]/, (,..L.,;J~>\.._w./ />rvf' \ .:fJ'vII\) Lr
1-\ ~- 'CD'" IS I b ~
'OR:
M
.
~.
.~
~
~~
I ~ J
~
~
t?
,
~
.()
~
~
~
~
~
~~
, ,-
CERTIFICATE OF SURVIT
_A~I;(,;4.NP4~ .so~s
{ <Iv
"".\ ~.s
.. "\---
~,,~. ~....
~"':~ ~
'" ~a e;.
n-"t'; ~ ~
I
;
t
.
~" ~
~. \
t\
,
&
t
e
D pe:"",'s /'rtJ" ,h70~u.. ,,,;
~ .LJe/1t1 ""oS . e.1'/~/~;,.!!J . sA f/oh~,I?
...7_/, . 4/ F<<J~JM~ (J 11(,~il- 8''''*3
~qrq9e. /.,- B/"yq~~.D '. ~. t'4~~ .,'
,18 7~
G
9066
~
.. ~,.,.
I" ...':" 3S,.tJ-..
I ~ . 'h'-I" .
; r-- ~_-:il: .~-
/0 : -,. !~It .,;, .
j %Z,.J.J " .
1 ~ it-:'
I It., 'ZJ"~1
J~"7 \,. ~
, t\~
: .~ 't
,-'::111\ " \IS
~ 1:;' ~ ~~.
i!i~ \l ~ ~~
,,- ~ ~.3J ~~
l~" 41 ."
,0 ~tt: ii .. ' ...1
. . 0' -tt
_t,,-.;2~_=1
.- I':' ..
,,":- . 50.",., .....
~ - -- /~~,2J"--
t\
-
.,
"
L ~67A~ L>.eScR / P /"/O;V'
L#r Z .8k:t:K "3
/5//'/65 CO.k.a~/.. k ADD~r/ON
.
I hereby cenitv 'ChIt II\is it a true _ COITKI ra.........' Ion of I n:tvey of Job No.
the boui\darles of the above de!cribed .1II\d ",d of Ihe of all but'.'"
if any. thereon~ and all visible tncroec:hmaftts. if .ny ~ t or on said land.
"
, ,DF.MARS" GA6RIB.
I.AHD SURVEYORS tHe.
';-':8030 Hnar La...
. Plr-adt. MN . ~.5iKl .
~
~
~
..s
-; 1, \
~ \
.~
~.
'-1. "
~~
:i:.b
~ll
l~' :
,
-
".. ----., . .
71.1
look - 1''9
//..-
$cal.
1~~':St
I
~ Bonestroo
~
II:.lII Anderiik &
1\J1 Associates
~,,'" Ard'litect$
Client: i Page;
Project: I proj. No:
Cakufatiol'ls For: Prepared By: I Date:
Reviewed By: ! Oate:
I
e
~~
Q..~ 1
>J~~V}
~ ~ \n ~ ~
~~ ':( 0
, j J ~ ~ ~
~ <'i~ :s::~
y\)O x. ~~
f ~,~ {is
~
1
Vl
L ~
-
-s:
V)
e
.J,I~
0'11
~llll
,/J, ,. I! I I
I. 11: I
; l f 1 l
r/ll! !1
/11:!1 II ! I ; I
Ii I ; I ! i lLl ,
j( 11 j I' ' \ III r--
/ t] Ill! \11
/ 11 II, I f II U-~--
/ 11 II' I I I I
-J i II I 'I 1 III
\ II 1 I I',
\ ! I!! II
, \ I i I /111 II
j j : j I
\1 I I I I"
\~, i I! '1111
\'~' i' I i
\ \ >, I!' I,' '\ !I
\ ~ I I \
i~~\ \ jl 1 1 I
LL ~\1! I ! I
~I' I
~\ I
\ \ 1
e
-
-+
A
,~
, '- ~
. ~~
~ v-<
J'I ~L \
I -o~d.,J
,..-'\) ~
~ s., a.-
~~~~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
;>I \:-' -9 J. "t-
""'6 Q y... -I- ~
,\~ iff; 0>
~. · B 11
lj , I -I, jj
Il~ ' i '!i H
l~ -Leol Ii
j~~l~i :i
H / ~ r=+=l, ;!
, I ,11
II Ill' L
" I'
/I 1 j 1
~____ l. :;.j,
'"
o
I.
.J
~ ~
_ d
>-~
C ~
-:tz.0
I
I
I
i
i
':.
l)<>
i
;
i
i
I
"f
I
I
i
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
~
~
\?
~
;::::".
\.ij
-.\.
Lv
J:'
'0
~
ley HEARING NOTICE
Board of Zonina Appeals
e
1-9-01
I
235 Louisiana Avenue South
Grea Brink
Greg Brink, with property located at 235 Louisiana Avenue South, has
petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance
from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to
construct a deck addition onto the north side of the existing house. This
construction requires a variance from the following section of City Code.
. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states
that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the
side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirement: In the
case of lots having a width between 70 and 100 feet, the side yard
setback shall be 15% of the lot width. The requested variance is for
3 feet off the required 14.75 feet to a distance of 11.75 feet on the
north side for the proposed deck.
This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday,
January 23,2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers,
7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota.
e
Adjacent properties require notification.
e