Loading...
05-22-01 BZA Agenda . . . Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, May 22, 2001 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road City Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - April 24, 2001 II. The Petitions are: 817 North Tyrol Trail (Map 9) (01-5-7) Eric and Nancv Flom, Applicants Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks . To reduce the required setback, which ranges from 9.6 feet to 11.7 feet, to 9 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the north side yard property lines. . To reduce the required setback, which ranges from 9.6 feet to 11.7 feet, to 4 feet for the existing attached garage at its closest point to the south side yard property lines. . To reduce the required setback, which ranges from 9.6 feet to 11.7 feet, to 6 feet for the proposed porch addition at its closest point to the south side yard property lines. To allow for the construction of a porch addition to the east side of the existing home and to bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setback requirements. 2420 Dresden Lane (Map 5) (01-5-8) Michael and Lvnda Rocheford, Applicants Request: Purpose: Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . .7 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.3 feet for the proposed home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Dresden Lane. To allow for the construction of a new home on the existing foundation. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks . 1 foot off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14 feet for the proposed home at its closest point to the south side yard property line. To allow for the construction of a new home on the existing foundation. 708 Westwood Drive South (Map 9) (01-5-9) Michael and Julia Drysdale, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . . Purpose: Request: Purpose: . 2.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32.4 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Westwood Drive South. To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard building setback requirements. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks . .6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.4 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the north side yard property line. To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setback requirements. 110 Maryland Avenue South (Map 18) (01-5-10) Pamela Green. Applicant Request: Purpose: Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks . .7 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.3 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the south side yard property line. To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setback requirements. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings . 5.1 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 4.9 feet for the existing swimming pool at its closest point to the attached deck. To bring the existing swimming pool into conformance with accessory building setback requirements. 6920 Wayzata Boulevard (Map 18) (01-5-11) Perkins Familv Restaurants. Applicant Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C) (4) Yard Requirements . To reduce the parking lot setback requirements for the proposed restaurant for the east side from 35 feet to 6 feet, on the south side from 35 feet to 0 feet, and on the north and west sides from 10 feet to 0 feet. To allow for the construction of a new restaurant building. III. Other Business . IV. A. Clarification of February 27,2001 Meeting Minutes - Variance for 2155 Kelly Drive Adjournment Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals . April 24, 2001 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, April 24, 2001, in the Council Conference Room, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Lang called the meting to order at 7:00 PM. Those present were: Chair Lang, Members McCracken-Hunt, Sell and Planning Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were Director of Planning and Development Mark Grimes, City Planner Dan Olson and Planning Secretary Lisa Wittman Request: . 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks I. Approval of Minutes - February 27,2001 MOVED by Sell, seconded by Shaffer, and motion carried un 27,2001 minutes as submitted. II. The Petitions are: 4505 Heathbrooke Circle (Map 5) (01-4-5 Ivan and Karen Brodsk A . feet to a distance of 14.67 feet for the existing oint to the west side yard property lines Purpose: nstruction of an addition to the west side of the existing Director of Planning a variances granted in the which is 26.4 feet approved the co'ft into the set ck up are requesti room addition setback. ment Mark Grimes stated that this property has had two ne along the east side of the home to construct a room addition, et rather than the required 35 feet. The other variance was . n of a mansard roof addition to the north side of the home, which goes feet rather than the required 35 feet. Grimes stated the variance they is a relatively minor variance along the west side of their home for a dining .33 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.67 feet from the required Shaffer clarified that it is a variance request for the addition and not for the existing home. Olson stated that was correct. Shaffer referred to the survey and stated that the middle projection of the house comes closer to the side property line than 14.67 feet and that the dimension is missing on the survey. Shaffer .recommended that the surveyor provide that dimension. McCracken-Hunt stated it looks like the dimension is approximately 12 feet, which is really 3 feet off the required distance. Shaffer asked if the proposed addition would be a single story addition. Karen Brodsky stated yes. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 24, 2001 Page 2 Lang asked the applicants when they looked at the layout if they looked at a plan that might work within the setback requirement. Ivan Brodsky stated yes, but anything less than a 12-foot addition wouldn't work, because their table wouldn't fit in the space. . Sell stated that if the addition were to be looked at from the Heathbrooke side, the 14.8 feet will look like 15 feet and because of the angled lot it will disappear. He stated the applicant wouldn't gain anything by going through the expense for a 9-foot addition. Request: property lines Ide and the house dimensions. She they can affect change McCracken-Hunt stated the lots to the west have houses that are R whereas this house has a corner condition with an angled side a isn't parallel to the property line which further complicates the stated that having a lot with two front yards they are limited a on. MOVED by Sell, seconded by McCracken-Hunt, an variance request to construct a room addition 3 fe for the addition at its closest point to the west side missing dimension on the survey will be .sub . unanimously to approve the quired 15 feet to a distance of 12 feet rty lines with the condition that the 6731 Golden Valley Road (M Qwest Wireless A Iicant . .46, Subd. 8 Yard Requirements equired 50 feet to a distance of 36 feet for the proposed ts closest point to the rear yard property line. Purpose: the construction of a cellular phone monopole behind the existing Society building. Grimes stat pril 9, 2001 Qwest Wireless appeared before the Planning Commission for recommend a City Council for a Conditional Use Permit that would allow approval to build a cellular tower 0 e Historical Society property. He stated that right now the City does not have an allowance for cell towers in the Institutional Zoning District and that Qwest came to City and indicated they had areas where they were having some coverage problems and that they needed to look at some areas that weren't properly zoned for the construction of the cell tower. He stated that in the Institutional Zoning District structures must be set back 50 feet from the property line and Qwest would like to set the monopole 36 feet from the rear property line along the Chicago Northwest Railroad tracks. Therefore, the variance would be for 14 feet to allow it to be constructed in that location. McCracken-Hunt asked if the monopole would be on a pad or if it would be fenced. John Gannon, . Qwest Wireless stated it would on a pad with hedges and would line up with the NSP power pole that's already on the site. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals April 24, 2001 Page 3 . Sell asked if Owest has had any trouble with anyone climbing the monopoles. Dave Mitchell, Owest Wireless stated that the pole does have climbing pegs, but the first peg is 12 feet off the ground and there has never been any problem. MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Sell, and motion carried unanimously to approve the requested 14 feet off the required 50 feet to a distance of 36 feet for the proposed monopole at its closest point to the rear yard property line. III. Other Business A. Election of Officers MOVED by Sell, seconded by Lang, and motion carried unan' Chair of the Board of Zoning Appeals whose term expir MOVED by Lang, seconded by McCracken-Hunt, Swedberg Vice Chair of the Board of Zoning Ap e IV. Adjournment .The meeting was adjourned at 7:40. . appoint McCracken-Hunt 2002. carried unanimously to appoint term expires April 1, 2002. . 817 North Tyrol Trail . 01-5- 7 Erie and N aney Floro . . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 817 North Tyrol Trail (Map 9) (01-5-7) Eric and Nancy Flom, Applicants Date: May 16, 2001 Eric and Nancy Flom, with property located at 817 North Tyrol Trail, are requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a porch addition onto the north side of the existing home. The building of this addition requires a variance from the side yard setback requirements of the Zoning Code. Also, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet the side yard setback requirements. The parcel to the south of this property, 831 North Tyrol Trail, was a platted vacant lot owned by the same property owner as 817 North Tyrol Trail. In 1997, that property owner sold this vacant lot and a new home was constructed at 831 in 1997. This created a situation whereby the side yard setbacks for 817 became more "apparent", although the distance from the side yard property lines have always been what they are. The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 70, but less than 100 feet, the side setback shall be 15 percent of the lot width. The area of the lot where the home, garage and proposed porch is located is in this width range. On the north side of the home, the required setback ranges from 9.6 feet to 11.7 feet. The applicant is requesting a north side yard variance so that the home is set back 9 feet from the property line. On the south side of the home, the required setback also ranges from 9.6 feet to 11.7 feet. The applicant is requesting a south side yard variance so that the new porch is set back 6 feet from the property line and the existing attached garage is set back 4 feet from the property line. The City's file on this property does not contain the original building permit for the home, but Hennepin County's property record system states the home was constructed in 1939. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . . .. Subject Property: 817 North Tyrol Trail Eric and Nancy Flom, Applicants o o p 2 . Z 21 532 . 3 . z ~ 10 II . 4102 12 . 4042 . !!! Hol,?I1S011 ;;; ., " ~2 · K. Law ~ 6uldcII ~ '3 . I .11 4022 6 +:~ SC.....~ o +.- ". ~ C'\..! ex:: {r:= {~J .. :l "'"' ..,.-.... !:; ".).= N .., .... ('..1 , -.. uJ r;"\ fI) ::::; o ... .. ... z z i IL o >- t- o Industrial . Other . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 01- 5 - 7 Date Received :.t I ~c I 0, Amount Received S"D. OJ ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: &>l::t 1--to~ -r't'~~r~L- 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: -E.~IL- ~..~~'1 FI-o~ Name 81--=t- UOrz...r;H- 0~4--r~L- LroLDe-d y~ Lt-11-.1 Address City/State/Zip l7 S-4l ~ (p 1'2- . "? T-r . 0 4-..:I.j t (p -:? . ? 1-"1-. fIJ -4 "Tc;j Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): .\-.P1- f (, J €>L?~ lO. , ~l~ ---r-Y~~ .J-I.--10L7 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: 1L Single Family -lL Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. 0~ Po~ ~Pl"1lC>~ .(t-Z'.olt,c IZ"OII).CJF:f:- 'Ek:-F- . t!Jf- 4-hu-?E:. t9yr ~1;-~1"'~ ~ ~ ~ 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons, necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. . 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys ar~ nof acceptable. The survey mustbe prep,red by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be sllowo. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construc;tion will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17", the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ e:;o. 0 crepresenting the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~a~---.~.. ~- Signature of Applicant . UNLESS CONSTRUCTION. OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means acrqss both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeiog with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name Comment KAN~~ \>~~~uY~ Signarure % ~~ ""'->' . (\ Address J2Z1 . u. "1'""'-{~~ ~l-l- Print Name . Comment YDU~j Jit le-p Signature ~ ~ k Address ~ I (p u. ---t-'1~k ~l L Print Name i:'(OY\ itJu Anrip,r7:fVL Comment Signature Address ~t:?1 'Ll. -r'l~I-~IL- Signature Address ~ o~ W. ~~"- ~L. . Print Name . Comment Signature ~ ~~~~. ~k ~,r 41,A'E- ..~~ ::..+ Address ~~ H~~w...- ~~ Print Name -?/~-1'-1r'~-- ~0r- ~S Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment: Signature Print Name Comment Signature Address .=1-1 {p l..-1f-~.IA- ~i= Address Address Address Address CERTIFICATE OF . FOR ERIC & NANCY FLOM 817 North Tyrol Trail Golden Valley, MN I J. I I"'ll __ '"" I SURVEY '7 I I Legal Description: Lot 16, Block 10, WEST TYROL HILLlsl I 172.0tJ - II S:5'''e' , h 0- ~I I I L_:,,)"r ~ I,' qR'f.; ~. i8 -$ .... r1. dP1/( \ ;~!"i~.I7~Ft.\ : O.~5 Ac.s... ~ NO.f/1 "" ~ , ./- n !...CJj + / / . ,;, Benchmark: t\11V- . \"J oW> TNH, iIlt_ersectiqn.RCl.v:i,n~ Trail , S?I with North Tyrol Trail..: N.G.V.D. 1929 adjusted elevation' = 888 ;91 f~~.~;~.'~'. /' ,~. / /' "- /.f"-" b'^ '''~o..o .1- I C- \ /', I \ I I ..... ,,' Jd,tL~ Herb. F. Lemire RLS Minnesota Reg. NO. 13349 4416 Abbott Ave. N Robbinsdale, MN 55422 Phone: 763/537-0497 / / , r1o.e!> I ~~ '3 -STolt'( f/llln'/6- H,,,4~ Scale: 1" = 20' o Denotes iron monument xooo.o = Existing elevatio Bearings are assumed ~...11 '1$ . " I hereb1~6~rt~y that this is a true and correct representation 'of,a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of '.the 10C, ation of all bUildingS" if any, ther, eon, and. I visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me this 28th day of April, 2001. . , / , / / . . . Eric and Nancy Flom of 817 North Tyrol Trail are applying for a variance to build a screen porch. Our house sits approximately 5' from the lot line on the side where we would like to build the screen porch. (See survey) Originally there was a deck at this location which rotted and had to be removed last year. Our house needed patching where the deck was attached due to the rotting and the animals that had entered our home and were living in our floor. We will be proposing a 12 x 12 screen porch built pergola style with screens from floor to ceiling and 2 screen doors to the outside (one toward our patio, one toward our neighbors deck). The previous owners of our home owned our lot (Lot 16) and the lot common to the lot line 5' from where we want to build the screen porch (Lot 15). They sold off Lot 15 approximately two years before we purchased our home. Lot 15 was built on 2-3 years ago abiding by the 15' setback rule. (see survey) Upon purchase of our home (10/97), this was not brought to our attention and at that time the clearing of the adjacent lot had not started so we never questioned the lot line location. We are on very good terms with our neighbors and they are very aware of our plans and plan to enjoy this porch almost as much as we enjoy their deck. I attempted to notify (6) properties of our application for the variance to build the screen porch per recommendation of the City of Golden Valley. Three attempts were made on the properties further away from our home and they either were not home or did not come to the door. I have never met the people who live at two of these three homes and our backyard is not visible to them. The (3) properties I successfully notified are the homes closet to us. Please let me know if you need anything further. Thank you for your consideration. Nancy Nelsen-Flom 817 North Tyrol Trail Golden Valley, MN 55416 . . . . . . . . . . . . I I .J B --, I L www.d.goUm_vlt~ Y 5-2-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 817 North Tyrol Trail Eric and Nancy Flom Eric and Nancy Flom, with property located at 817 North Tyrol Trail, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for two variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct a porch addition onto the rear of the existing home. As a result of this construction, it was discovered that the existing home, attached garage and the new porch addition meets current side yard setback requirements. The home, garage and porch requires variances from the following sections of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 70, but less than 100 feet, the side setback shall be 15 percent of the lot width. The area of the lot where the home, garage and proposed porch is located is in this width range. On the north side of the home, the required setback ranges from 9.6 feet to 11.7 feet. The applicant is requesting a north side yard variance so that the home is set back 9 feet from the property line. On the south side of the home, the required setback also ranges from 9.6 feet to 11.7 feet. The applicant is requesting a south side yard variance so that the new porch is set back 6 feet from the property line and the existing attached garage is set back 4 feet from the property line. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, May 22, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . 2420 Dresden Lane . 01-5-8 Michael and Lynda Rocheford . . Hey Memorandu Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2420 Dresden Lane (Map 5) (01-5-8) Michael and Lynda Rocheford, Applicants Date: May 16, 2001 Michael and Lynda Rocheford, with property located at 2420 Dresden Lane, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants had approached the City to demolish the existing home down to the foundation and construct a new home on this foundation. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home foundation does not meet the front and south side yard setback of 15 feet. . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states the front setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the home is for.7 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.3 feet to the front property line along Dresden Lane. The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case oflots having a width of 100 feet or greater, the side setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 1 foot off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14 feet at its closet point to the south side of the home. As you can see from the property survey, a portion of the property lies within a Floodzone. The City Engineer, Jeff Oliver, PE is recommending that the following two conditions be made part of any variance approval: · The lowest floor of the new home be one foot about the 100 year high water level. · The applicant provide a legal description of the floodzone area. The City Engineer would like to dedicate a drainage and utility easement around the floodzone so that the City can legally store storm water runoff there (this is merely legalizing what is already happening). Also, this would prevent the property from building any permanent structure in the floodzone area. . The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in May of 1962 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. No other variance requests have been approved for this property. . Subject Property: 2420 Dresden Lane Michael and Lynda Rocheford, Applicants ~... (::) "l ~Qi::! .ct~ ...z, .571('85.....--. 154.7 nus . LAKE PARK C/7Y ., ~ VA.u.Jy RESERVE OUTLOT A . . . 'l"~ .. . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number D I - f' - 3 Date Received 4/3::.1vf Amount Received S IJ. 0.) ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: ~Y?() OIt'ts.d-ef'J \-ANL- 2. BZA Petition Date mA I di:;t....p j.oJ I Petitioner: (Y\ lc:..\-\4-e \ f. Rc C ..-\~i1.O Name _ .;) "l '-(C) .~ (:i iL ~_ Aue-. (\J~')\'t_(l t Address <1:'5') - q cS"' - ~Lr?<; Business Phone .~Lt ).J- 3. .- L-1'''OA- 'rzQ\...t~'W "'7,. IL.J hb I N ~/) 1\"1 <- v11;.J City/State/Zip '1 ~3 .-. ~2> j- CeLt ~ I Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): L6T 'S;; 'is{~(.lc3-,, CiJmbe.d.t~.Jn 1-t,1I~ 1'~t\ ~Orf\~N ;-h~rt\lep l<~ C) vr-r'11 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: XSingle Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other 7. . Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. Sf:i::. ~\.~ 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines sh,1I be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. . 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacentto the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name H, ~fI L 5 ,t3t-- PH Comment Signatu~~(dt/~r- Print Name lj C"~~ ~'-/ . Comment ' Address ;R11'1O@{'f/tIqt 1f41~. Signature Address '2 12/ D('~ 5>j<~ J-.~ <-- Print Name Comment /-1 e; 1 <, cj, -t' I Print Name Comment Signature Address :)..;~D ~)NS--\.' '- ('-Ql\ e . Print Name ~Sf-t\/'e-" -t-SCCi>{\.. Gab.e-l . Comment Signature . Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature . Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment: Signature Print Name Comment Ar~.~J)(l~J~ Address ~() () '~{?'Jcl~,~ ~\-,-\.e. -, J \./ i . i fj ~ J..; JJ Y u e. , '.;c(%", .. , 0' .-<-j :J 4.jAddress iQ. LJ It." l) )y:@',~:' Jf"~ Ln Address Address Address Address , . 1~ . .. .. .: <.; . SURVEY FOR: MIKE ROCKFORD I PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2420 Dresden Lane. Golden Valley. Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIP1l0N: Lot 5. Block 2. CUMBERLAND HILLS 3RD APPI1l0N, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I h~eby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the ~~ boundaries of the land above descrlb. ed and of the location of all .buildings, if any, <!/,o;;. thereon. and all visible encroachments, If any. from or on said land. ~~ \ Dated this18th day of July, 2000. ~ bY.~. '" Jack Boike Innesota License No. 20281 ~ ~ ~ \J) ~/ .~ ~.<& ~. ~ O.~ ~ ~J \ \ NOTES: 1. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the northwest line of Lot 5. Block 2. CUMBERLAND HILLS 3RD ADDI1lON which is assumed to have a bearing of North 66 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds East. 2. The area of the prop~ty described hereon is 15,750 square feet or 0.3615 acres. 3. No title work was furnished for the preparation of this survey to verify the existence of any easements or encumbrances. LEGEND 'Q POWER POLE -RE-OVERHEAD WIRES ~ ~ \ \ \ 60 SCALE IN FEET EGAN FIELD & NOWAK SURVEYORS INC. 7415 WAVZATA BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA TELE: (612) 546-6837 2689-8 - 5865 ?"7""~ . . . . . . . . . ......... :.....:. .:. :.. :.:. .~ RYAN RYAN COMPANY, INC. 3361 Republic Ave. . St. Louis Park, MN 55426 Telephone (952) 915.6475 . Fax (952) 915-6480 E-mail: ryan@ryancompanyinc.com Web Site: www.ryancompanyinc.com BOILERS/HEATING SYSTEM COMPONENTS Monday, April 30,2001 City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Re: Petition for Ordinance Waiver The reason we are asking for the waiver is that the existing foundation that we are planning on utilizing was placed on the property to conform to the curve of the street and also the existing houses. The best guess is that this was done with the intention of making all the houses uniform and matching the street curve. The one end of the house is right where the curve of the street starts. The existing foundation is in good shape and the grading and landscaping has been in place for over 36 years and it would be a waste to disturb this, just to move the foundation a few inches. Our intention was to use the existing foundation and add to the back of the house to add living space for our family and also our parents who will be living with us and have been the owners for 36 years. =ci.goUm_vll~ Y 5-2-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 2420 Dresden Lane Michael and Lynda Rocheford Michael and Lynda Rocheford, who are buying the property located at 2420 Dresden Lane, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for two variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to demolish the existing home down to the foundation and build a new home. As a result of this construction, it was discovered that the existing home foundation does not meet current setback requirements. The home requires variances from the following sections of City Code. Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states the front setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the home is for.7 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.3 feet to the front property line along Dresden Lane. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or greater, the side setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 1 foot off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14 feet at its closet point to the south side of the home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, May 22,2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . 708 Westwood Drive South . 01-5-9 Michael and Julia Drysdale . . . . Hey Me rand m Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 708 Westwood Drive South (Map 9) (01-5-9) Michael and Julia Drysdale, Applicants Date: May 16, 2001 Michael and Julia Drysdale, with property located at 708 Westwood Drive South, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants had approached the City to demolish the existing attached garage and construct a new garage in its place. This addition will conform to all setback requirements for the Residential zoning district. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet the front setback requirement of 35 feet and the north side yard setback requirement of 15 feet. City Staff has allowed the applicants to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the new garage. This was done only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless form is attached. The Drysdales will soon begin construction of the garage. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states the front setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. . The variance request for the home is for 2.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32.4 feet to the front property line along Westwood Drive South. The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or greater, the side setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for .6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.4 feet at its closet point to the north side of the home. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in September of 1940 for the construction ofthe house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. No other variance requests have been approved for this property. . Subject Property: 708 Westwood Drive S Michael and Julia Drysdale, Applicants . (..5//.5) - ( 1500) _ 6erma/n ; ~ ~~ ., .., !: ~ . ~I 3 2 815 s. 0 JI ~16 :2 = (Z400) j W/cKs 'S 7'1) fall 25 m '7ZSJ 'Ie/nman 23~ 'Jl3 (6'z) ~ . t 529 /lZ L~ . ~ 5 !o\ 4 ~ 3(} ,.. 150 . 7Dg (;J~s.wrob D (L. S. Street Address "HOLD HARMLESS' I, fVtCc(~~L (l... VI-~s.f)NJ: ,am requesting the City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) C:.Af!.AG.e A-b~,J onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. " . ~j..\A~ fL Df2-tJSMLc- Pn~ ~~ Signature V/3C/O' Date rJJ ~ ()~ City of Golden Valley Staff Signature . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number Date Received Amount Received ~- (), uv ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 70g 1tJ~~LJ~ ~.;!.. 5, 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: yv\:I::CJ~ A. ;Jot (}JdSruCCt) Address . C fa i ?-J .> 4 tI - S-~ S"" 2- Business Phone S'P-I Ii:. Name DR. S- ~ G l)l U'b"rJ tlML ~ (j) City/State/Zip , 7Ca.>. 3'irt - b"3::.7f. Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): LCYr III AN!) Au.. -r~ PkP-T of <"C!l to, f3.(.J.':)CiL i:tj ~,..J~Tr{'S If,.)lrS'"/ l'I~cL u.- . . . L'-l . ~. . CJl.ll\-~L'i o'F A LLJ \f: 'M'L~WN' 'YP-CiIV\ p~ eN' ~ U-S~ St,fl'LU-I Lars€" t1F- SA;xD L-o'l ~irI:'DL~T' B~~Q:(J 'f\'t€ .s~ I ":t1lX.\.: A,1'tf) 'TI+(;- "rot..G-lWEf.t'lfltt:..1 ccp...~R..r 7(,+C(l...~F: 7b It- po.J).rr cfJ' <OkC Gltsrl51lc..'{ C.DJ1r ~~Of- / I ~G:LVJ.:.:c\1J>tif'C BcftWtrlfN 'ClAii::. SC\l~1b'YL~'1 jl({'~ "'O/l!t~~~\.f Cb(J.....Jlt.1LS ~F; 6. Type of property involved in this petition:HcrrJ(u~1JI./ COUN"tt./ j fVl:rrrflf~Si)7A Residential: K Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance. that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. GM-AGrt: AbO$~ 4\:) G)l-.t:gr$iS6 ~wcrC,.-u(itft.. '-)l'!:S~6 8. (Staff will complete this item) I .3. (:'CNS~\Jq~~ " .J\Db,tT (3..~ C~....,) Fe ~DJ Go .. Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered .Iand surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x .17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ Sb representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. l UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If ona corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACt;NT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing,at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name Comment -r P..AC Y ISRAEL Signalu~~ . \ ~ ) Address go g GSb5r(,rtlll) Ilt.,. $, Print Name M~tL'" fJbAJJ . Comment Signature I ~~ '\ Address ,11 wEsrlJDo~ 1) it , S. C'-'.c t:~. 61'/11 / Print Name Comment Signature Address ,,~() Wl:f:VrtJlC\:)\ t)L. s: . Print Name Comment Signature Address . . . . . . . . www.n.goUm_vlt~ Y 5-2-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 708 Westwood Drive South Michael and Julia Drysdale Michael and Julia Drysdale, who own the property located at 708 Westwood Drive South, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for two variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to tear down the existing attached garage and replace it with a new garage. As a result of this construction, it was discovered that the existing home does not meet current setback requirements. The home requires variances from the following sections of City Code. · Section 11.21 J Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states the front setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the home is for 2.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32.4 feet to the front property line along Westwood Drive South. · Section 11.21J Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or greater, the side setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for .6 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.4 feet at its closet point to the north side of the home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, May 22, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . 110 Maryland Avenue South . 01-5-10 Pamela Green . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 110 Maryland Avenue South (Map 18) (01-5-10) Pamela Green, Applicant Date: May 16, 2001 Pamela Green, with property located at 110 Maryland Avenue South, is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to replace an existing deck onto the west side of the existing home. During the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home and swimming pool do not meet the side yard setback requirements and setbacks for accessory structures. The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7{C) (I) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or greater, the side setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for .7 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.3 feet at its closet point to the south side of the home. The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. A swimming pool is considered an accessory structure. City Code states that the pool shall be located at least 10 feet from the deck. The property owner is requesting variances for the pool to be located at a distance of 4.9 feet from the deck. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in October of 1977 for the construction of the house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 110 Maryland Avenue S Pamela Green, Applicant S C ALE: I INCH = 200 FEET 17 S~E:~C.:. 2:c~~ 1'.' 11 8: f-~. 2\ . ;: __<=J "',us . I (r-p ;;. I I N I N.#7-q'ltJ .. . . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number () I - 5"- (C Date Received 5'/,10 , Amount Received f]{)~ (fi) ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: -Uf) mhJ\.>:J\~^-tQ ft~~ltl ~0\1~_ 2. BZA Petition Date Petitioner: p{~ 'fiJ... Q (f).... C~ f>e.li'- -' Name '. .,'. ,.35Lfa 4l (') rN\ rL~ \ Q N...-{) L{\ '-)-\~,. F.C, I ~ .J1\ "- Th(l~Q\.( , rn ~) Address.. City/State/Zip (, <c ~) 5Yd _c1~~ ( '1 (0 ~~ J ~Lf r-~<r" , Business Phone Home Phone 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): L r-+ r?) g ~L<: ~L,-t<, ~S C () \rt,~ 0 .:<,~~& \~~ ) \~ I~ "- Q r 1 v-..... C Cc~ ~ ~, \ rr, \ () ru:v::{~ Type of property involved in this petition: / Residential: X Single Family _ Double DWelling _ M~iJ DwelliOg Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office 6. Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), add ition(s) , and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. \'\.. - (".J.J.;~~~ ~~~.....Ni;'~ ~WV.J:.dl '-~~l.f...k ~~'-\S~ ~ ~\~~\.ei fOG\. -{h{~~,- u.:~' ~tLe~) tV\ l q ~ d...... 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s)-. Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ ;so,()) representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Applicatio ee. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property'owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adja~nt property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) //'; . /) \ Print Name (./itl/IJ It USe",) Comment //.'...'.:. '.....). L ,f i I ji : J Signatur &t(fl" . . ...L: I Address 7 D '0'\ 0 ~~ \0, AQQtAL~ ~ Print Name . Comment crtA~-+t~ P~t Signature ~~. Print Name fi; vIr f1c/,t,.!c{ ~ It::: \I Address ...lJ~ (Y\~~ \_c~Q t1v~ &J Comment Signature /~~ Address , 3 (')lI~OL\J. 0 \p,~Q ~.l ~ ~) Print Name R! C/-J fft f( Le 6-0 vJ Comment Signature ~f:if4--- / _4 I Address f 15 t-\.Q l ~ rI0 f:'J... tf\ \:~ 2rc, . . I'Jt-n-l::>-d:talO.1 10':10 t:lla IJIIJ.LIII :l/lllI.L1 HJJVHI'fL,~ ~vc. T J l'fl.::l 1'I.I"ANl~LA bJ.'::::4rqc:s,b( r'.la'::::/IO":) ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 4747964 Fax (952) 4748267 SURVEY FOR: PAMELA GREEN SURV.EYED: April, 2001 DRAFTED: April 23, 2001 REVISED: May 16,2001 Show water. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Block 1, Rings Colonial3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK: I. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of our services does not include detennining what you own, which is a legal maller. Please cbeck the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, sucb as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important. 3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the corners of the property. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: .. · " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, unless otherwise noted. ~G2 F'OUND . . ~oo ~.! ((21 . d 1\:1101 . UI'lAINAGE: ANO Ul1l/ry EASEMENT '" Cl ~W r----------------_____'i :i!II>~j S I I _ ~o~ ~ -O~o 9 I I . ~~~ I " ~~~ , I ,"~ I t" g~Vij 0 I OlJ ji\ f" ~ I .' i ~, ~ ~ ~ I' ~ I ..,1 ~ 21 > ~~ ~, " c I 1;\ Ell t: ~I I~ I 9~L I I 2~ '. x I I ~ !: I I ~ II> I ~ ~I !'II ''''7 _+ ~ I 'L.~ 6'S~ I g-gt I 9 1 I 1 I i I I I I ;. I I I I '~I IV< I 9 !Xl I I I~ i 10 --' I 11>> I I ___- I ,0 -----1"----_ L__~_----__ . ~I ~~~ 0 , - J.N3"3S"'3 .l.J.l1lJ.n o I I (J) ; I !XlI t;:XJ.... (.:iUl v<U) c.ri":"" .j>.0l . , I , 1111 bo ~~ g!!l ~!il 0.... ~~ ~~I'" f ~ I g I e ~ , \ \ .t~ ;:v-;,. 'V g~ 'so L=l 99 'O?:~ l=~ . "'- - ~""g 0"';0 ;ll~i!ii "'en'" :!....o o~..., ~:i!~ I"'l~n '" I"'l iii ,Z 1 !Xl ~o> ~~ Nt.i No> I . I..., MARYLAND I IN A VENUE 1'" so. I .l. ~ . . . We wish to replace our existing deck. We are changing neither the design nor the dimensions. The prior owners added the existing deck and the swimming pool in 1982. The landscaping at the time we purchased the home was designed around the current deck configuration and pool placement. We have since that time re-Iandscaped (once extensively), again using the existing deck and pool placement as the focal points. It is my understanding that the current deck does not meet the setback requirements now in place for proximity to a swimming pool. It is further my understanding that the current setback is 10 feet from any point of the pool. As the survey illustrates, given the placement of the swimming pool, together with the space limitations and configuration of our backyard, any other deck design will drastically reduce the size and substantially compromise the practical use of a replacement deck. An additional consideration is the substantially increased cost of any other design. Aside from meeting our family's particular use, the current deck design and dimensions will allow use of some (it may be all) of the existing footings. Given the clay soil on which our home rests, new footings would have to be drilled deeper and provided with additional support, which comes at much greater cost than we are reasonably able to afford. Our deck is at least 19 years old (we assume it was built with the pool and addition in 1982). It is in the middle to late stages of deterioration. We have been unable to complete the project because a variance is needed. We hope you will agree that our request for a variance is reasonable. Thank you. . . . . . . . www.cigoUm_vI1~ Y 5-8-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 110 Maryland Avenue South Pamela Green Pamela Green, who owns the property located at 110 Maryland Avenue South, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for four variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing deck and replace it with a new deck. As a result of this construction, it was discovered that the existing home and existing pool do not meet current setback requirements. The home and pool require variances from the following sections of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or greater, the side setback shall be 15 feet. The req uested variance is for .7 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.3 feet at its closet point to the south side of the home. . Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. A swimming pool is considered an accessory structure. City Code states that the pool shall be located at least 10 feet from the deck, and be located at least 5 feet from any lot boundary. The property owner is requesting variances for the pool to be located at a distance of .6 feet from the deck, 4 feet from the rear yard property line, and 3 feet from the south side yard property line. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, May 22,2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . 6920 Wayzata Boulevard . 01-5-11 Perkins Family Restaurant . . Hey Mem randum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 6920 Wayzata Boulevard (Map 18) (01-5-11) Perkins Family Restaurants, Applicant Date: May 16, 2001 Perkins Family Restaurants, with property located at 6920 Wayzata Boulevard, is requesting variances from the Industrial zoning code (Section 11.36). The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing restaurant building and build a new building on the site. Because of this construction, the applicant is requesting variances from the parking lot setback requirements. .his property had previously received several variances. In September, 1977, the property owner received variances for the existing building and site so that exterior improvements could be made to the building. Since the existing building is being demolished, these variances would be considered null and void. The variances that were received at that time were as follows. A copy of the meeting minutes are attached for your review. · Reduce the required 35 foot building setback along Wayzata Boulevard to 25 feet. · Reduce the 10 foot green space requirement along the east side to 4 feet. · Reduce the 10 foot green space requirement along the west side to 3.5 feet. · Reduce the 20 foot building setback requirement along the west side to 18.4 feet. The following is the current requested variance: · The requested variances are from Zoning Code Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C)(4), which relates to parking lot requirements. The applicant would like to reduce the parking lot setback for the east side from 35 feet to 6 feet; on the south side from 35 feet to 0 feet, and on the north and west sides from 10 feet to 0 feet. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in November of 1962 for the construction of the building. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . . Subject Property: 6920 Wayzata Blvd Perkins Family Restaurant, Applicant ;c-~' :L '\: -=--: i I =-=---::::;-- - ----=" . I ~I ;, 8$4.23 1I(,,.-q'ztJ -IF .. , -.-:-- ~~ "!t.: 1fI~ . _--= ~___ .."....6;: t J:: ..~ ~.: -", 531.8" SB'-3"3I*r -:.2~.-! - -'- -- - _ ,48.;6=" - .. ~ . (Filed ,.2/.5') ~...... ~ 04- ~ ,,: ~ ~;;n . . : d" .,' -.J.... (I) . '" .:~~~2.::!"_~__ S ~ 291.06 Ii: J.;;. · ~ {I;) ~ ;;:s 291.0J; ~ <:3 MARKET <) ''-0 ~ '0 6 ~I 29t% I : I I I ...''':: I : .':~:. : ,NI :.f.! I I- -.._:_ - .:..I ....... I I "':jU I , I~l'" '66 .&.;..- I y"':::- I~::~. __a: : . ~ I \ ".' 7000 :s 4.o~8~'1 J'I1.3/'Z2" 140 "I ! 110.43 ....~ ';D. . J -1,m?;,'3"D"e 4: fii'50'li5:r- I ~ R,5654.58 ao8.32 ... i7 . .1~ ~..- ;1-g'1""S9'IO'E 33:;'SA\lE i~' i a , I~ :i ~ MY . I!! Z9l.iH . ." ~40 ~ ~~ .. ,- ~ '" I.~ ~ ---=. -JJo- 58r4D",E 60. fJ} I ~ "i'. .~ '" . .. . .; ~ ' PART C ; REGISTEREI 'l SURVE) NO. 64: E .s~S:4f- ~ .. .. .. "! .Ie. 2 ~ .~\)~\\ S~, 11.,~ +~ 4'4~ ;~~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~.\)~. I . . J 4b..q .4 'Il '" ~ : 111 . I~.! ~ ~ ..,J s\fflsl, .;. · 1- (!) In34' 100.05 .;........ " . 1 "'~\ GOtDeN /AZ.'i....' 6. :~>~...... ~ ~ TAco 8 VAttey ,\ :. ~~" . ~." I Ett AD "t ~! .:~.~,.., 6700-68$0 ,1.II'.~ ('-.I 2 ~ .. I .. .i'~'i ~ I r..\ .. . . ~l 6660 ,.,'"1.... .., ". ~ I", "'.. : ,,;1.",,'1" 1.-:3''''''71. Lc"U.to -':,-. . 66a1,.(;1II'" ~ "",l ~ '~,~ fI(.W, I a~8 4S "II : 6d L______ "......',,4,1 ~.. ::::}t~ _51.5~_____ __'.l.-=-'~3 .!t."fO;;:--~--;......__~"~'77 ~-=------uaz -r.1N1u"l' -- - -~~ 3~~. --- , \ ---~ ----------:..----.fi!4'!!4..LN.l~'Litl{..~--.- -----__ ~___ =- ":;'7-'1#0- li';;o \ -r- .~_~... .s,fnd',,~;, 1!1'~~ I 4.1' 4' I .4 0'1'31'- ... . ' \: 0.,';0' :L~'JSO,O__",_ . \: 1~ l. ~~:1~~ . Le' 11",11 , : , , . 4'q '<:>J~ . '~4 ~ ~ :;t ~ ~ '>$ L I~" L ~,~ :::0 c.;. F-'l" 1'1 l-----'-"---,!/~-- - --,-, -. '--\.:9.-r~a \l._ easf !!J138 ., ", CITY OF GOLDEN VALL Y CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK __I"I.~ WIST-- "" ,..~ -.-.- 1'27.41 ~eS." . .r2(1lBl 11;57 CITY OF GOLDEN I&:..EY S9JB16S P.05~0B ,Revised 1/99) Petition Number . Date Received Amount Received (SSO residential - $150 other) - PEnTlON FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD Of ZONING APPEALS 1. Street acIdreas of property involved in this petition: (,,120 WAYLA~ 13L'-'t::J 2. BZA Petttion Date . ---l2>" MA'( 72......J MEEm JJ ~ 3. Petitioner: P~~tJS.1i..M\~ RF~T~\}~TS ~6~" .FbPl-A1? 4/<;;. #&0. MliMAMSTt.J '3~J1'.~CJ'i Address/ J,. Cily/stateizip ~- ~ill:d Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all properly involved in lhia petition. please name property owner and describe petitioner"s interest (legal and. other) In this property: . $Ee- AssoJE:. 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): s.jRJE'f ATTALHED B. Type of property involved in Ihis petition: Residential: _ Single Family _ Double OweUing _ Multiple Dwelling Ind\Jstrial t... Commercial _ lnstibJUonal _ Bus. & Prof. Office _ Other }{ - Ct-A.rJ;..:r 'R'E5\~~1 I.., l....PJ::,.~t:.L- '"i:' O~ . . , 7 . . t:;Q"'" OI~ P V'..,.,.~ -- --' --.. ...... -., 5'3381B9 P. B&"aa .*)-200L 11= 57 C 1 TV CF W...DEH VAlLEY 8. Detailed description ofbuiding (s)..addition(s). and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petibon will be the baSis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be c;hanged before or after the building permit issued. ~1<:j1~(_ '~\~~~,...~lW\tI'~ ~_V~S~t:":l.. NElAI ~~~ .~~,- ~S'aA'~ SIZI!': -r: ,&--) ~~Of~I\--r6~~l~~(. S f\~ . See. A T"\Ac..>>eb D~Au-l".) ~- (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Waiver of Section SUbd(S). Subd(s). Wa;.,er of section 9. Please attaGn a brief abtemeM tJf the reaSDns. neceaity. or hardship whieh 1R9vide grounds far the grantin9 of this waiver. Attach letter. photographs, or other evidence. if appropriate. 10. ~~:sn::: ::::18 survey of the proDeftY must be .~Ch.d.p"O~f;ed :::~ CC8Dt:abi~ Th~ .urvey mUAt be preD,red. ill 1'e9'~- :;= :ft; ;~;~~~r I~;~ed in the Stat!! af Minn_~The .urv~ muat :~;: :~~=~i,,;_ builcfin911a and K~_tJ;; The 4.~tiInce from the house Ib: :: ~d . _u _In to the frOnt llI"d aide prope,. lanas _hall bA ~hown. ~: ;8. ~:bA~ of~~ huildiftas from the pl'Qnertv line witl be needed. ; ;~~u;..o,,;;:~::~: :;:-:y ahoul~ show an .p~fft.hn" Jaealioft of a"!l . :_-::: ~.~;; _ n "!tin pIo_ to ~ s~ -- - o-""c!illn ...\1 ke I ~ I I: ;~;:;; ~ la'ger than 11" Jt 17". 'ho aqplicant will auppJv to.ven additional cD1)iH of the surv.y for usl bv the Bo,rd.. 11. To the Applicant To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this attiOn are true and correct. Attached herewith is my chec:k in the amOUf\t of $ 1)0 representing the Board of Zoning Appeab Application Fee. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR 'THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST. IF GRANTeD, lS 140T TAKEN WITHIN ONe YeAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comrnents can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) r\~~"7c... $ A Print Name 1ft:! L Gi-ovL'::' Comment S"'pczr"" ~e...:.<:..o.... //-; Signaturei~ ~~.... Address 61$5 n.,v-kcf 5f. G. V. Print Name p~",", Q~./2 ::::..-l \. . Comment G6 It::- ~ ...... . Signature .~ Ji-^ - Address be:::;; tr '( Lu(1J/<.~,- 0 ~ Print Name S--e.v..t\ (fA {(C,11 ~ Comment ~ ~~ L h If<.." Signature ~~ /4tf-, Address (.;, 1 z <;- ft1~ ~ j"".)- )f & I Print Name Comment ~~-t/~. ~5 (;;,2,42,:= /1ft'?1/rtn-o.s ,(jS,'1~ /95r;t(- ~~ fHa-/t. ~ Address 6Ytt; W-+y'Z/fI"'~ ~ Signature . ~ . Vanney Associates architects Designers Following is a response to item #9 of the Petition of Ordinance Waiver, City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals: The site has an existing Perkins Restaurant building and parking lot, which will be demolished and replaced with a new Perkins Restaurant building and parking lot. The existing restaurant building is 5587 square feet with 186 seats. The existing parking lot contains 82 parking stalls as required when the existing building was constructed. The site is a comer lot with building and parking setbacks as follows; Building & Parking Setbacks - Building & Parking Setbacks - South & East Sides - North & West Sides - 35 feet 20 feet A variance to the set back to parking was granted to the site when the existing building was built. The new restaurant building will be 5800 square feet with 172 seats. The new parking lot is designed with 115 parking stalls as required by the current zoning ordinance. The following is a comparison between the existing building and parking and the new building and parking; Existing Building Size - New Building Size - 5587 Sq. Ft. 5800 Sq. Ft. . Existing Seat Count - New Seat Count - 186 Seats 172 Seats Existing Parking Stalls - New Parking Stalls - 82 spaces 115 spaces You will note the new restaurant has 14 less seats than the existing restaurant but is required have 33 more parking stalls. The fact the site is on a comer lot with two 35 foot setbacks and the fact the ordinance setbacks are same for both building and parking at 35 and 20 feet presents a hardship to improving the site by building a new building and parking lot. Therefore, we are requesting a variance to the setbacks to parking as follows; East Side - South Side - North & West Sides - Reduce the Setback from 35 feet to 6 feet. Reduce the Setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. Reduce the Setback from 20 feet to 0 feet. The setbacks prescribed in the current zoning laws would not allow the existing parking lot to be built to its current configuration or allow the new parking lot design required for the construction of the new restaurant building. There is a survey by Rehder & Associates and the proposed new site plan prepared by Vanney Associates attached to this petition for your review. . J()O North Robert street. Suite 201 (651)222-464~ FAX(651)222-3034 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 . . . " Board of Zoning Appeals September 13, 1977 page 6 nnegasco, felt the Church has been a good neighbor in the area an felt Mr. er had made every effort to cooperate "lith adjacent proper \'mers. ~1rs. Anne .lson asked what assurances the proposal for the benn landscaping would have. Board Secretary noted that, if approved, thi oposal must go to the Building rd of Review next, at which time all ne. ors will again be notified, including landscaping, etc. is approved. Robert {..ragman asked ~1r. Richt Mike Sell moved to grant the ~ Glen Christiansen seconded request n the amended agenda. Discussion s called on the motion. Robert Wagman stated t, based on past actions of the d and as alternatives do exist, he felt e peoplels wishes should be acknowledge d could not support the mot"ion. " Sell stated he favored the proposal, noting t roponent's efforts an at the area had been platted for many years for this "'. and rezoned from Op evelopment approximately 6 years ago. Mahlon Swedberg note he only reas this \'/aiver is for more parking in front to suit the tenant. C airman Kost called the vote on the motion. Upon vote it \'/O.s4 aye votes to approve the request on the amended agenda and 1 nay vote (Hagman opposed). Z7.-~-40 (Map 18) Industrial 6920 Hayzata Boulevard Perkins Cake & Steak Inc. The petition is for the waiver of Sections 5.05 & 5.06 of the Zoning Code as the building now exists. for 251 off the required 351 green area along the front lot line, and for 6' off the required 101 green area along the East lot line, and for 7.5' off the required 101 green area along the Hest lot line, and for 1.61 off the required 20' building side yard setback along the West lot line to a distance of 18.4' as the building now exists. The Chairman reviewed the petition and found it in order, noting no response from adjacent property owners. The requests are for the building as it now exists to allow for exterior remodeling and upgrading of the site and parki ng. The Secretary noted that Perkins Ca ke & Steak staff had met with the City staff several times to upgrade the existing building and area as much as possible. A green area has been estab1 ished in the rear and further efforts along the side lot lines and front are proposed. Mr. John Redman was present for Perkins Cake & Steak Inc. and reviewed the plans with the Board. Glen Christiansen moved to approve the \'/aivers as requested. Mahlon Swedberg seconded the motion. Upon vote it wa$ unanimous to approve. WWW.CigOMm_vl1~ Y 5-7 -01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 6920 Wayzata Boulevard Perkins Family Restaurants Perkins Family Restaurants, with property located at 6920 Wayzata Boulevard, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for four variances from the Industrial zoning district. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing restaurant building and replace it with a new restaurant building on the property. The applicant is requesting variances to reduce the parking lot setback requirements for the property. This construction requires variances from the following section of City Code. · The requested variances are from Zoning Code Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C)(4), which relates to parking lot requirements. The applicant would like to reduce the parking lot setback for the east side from 35 feet to 6 feet; on the south side from 35 feet to 0 feet, and on the north and west sides from 10 feet to 0 feet. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, May 22,2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Adjacent properties require notification.