The URL can be used to link to this page

08-28-01 BZA Agenda . . . I. Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road City Council Chambers Approval of Minutes - July 24, 2001 II. The Petitions are: 1508 Alpine Pass (Map 10) (01-8-27) Robert Anderson, Applicant Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setbacks . 5.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.9 feet for the proposed entryway addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Alpine Pass. To allow for the construction of an entryway addition to the existing home. 3940 Glenwood Avenue (Map 8) (01-8-28) Dennis Jordan, Applicant Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks . 12.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the east side yard property line. To bring the existing home into conformance with east side yard building setback requirements. 1001 Tyrol Trail North (Map 9) (01-8-29) Irene Bartram, Applicant Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks . 11.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 3.5 feet for the proposed porch addition at its closest point to the east side yard property line. . 12.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet for the fireplace addition at its closest point to the east side yard property line. To allow for the construction of a porch addition and fireplace to the existing home. . . . 4515 Chatelain Terrace (Map 8) (01-8-30) Ted Lana, ~pplicant Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback . 0.18 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.82 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Chatelain Terrace. To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard building setback requirements. 515 Cloverleaf Drive (Map 8) (01-8-31) Jim Martens, Applicant Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback . 14.35 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20.65 feet for the existing porch at its closest point to the front yard property line along Cloverleaf Drive. . 11.08 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 23.92 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Cloverleaf Drive. To bring the existing porch and home into conformance with front yard building setback requirements. 1316 Kelly Drive (Map 15) (01-8-32) Joe and Sue Forster, Applicants Request: Purpose: Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback . 4.64 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 30.36 feet for the porposed front yard porch at its closest point to the front yard property line along Kelly Drive. To allow for the construction of a front yard porch to the existing home. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks . 1.2 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.8 feet for the proposed room addition at its closest point to the north side yard property line. To allow for the construction of a room addition to the existing home. 7601 Winsdale Street North (Map 15) (01-8-33) David Downs-Reid, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback . .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Winsdale Street North. . .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Quebec Avenue North. 2 . . . Purpose: Request: Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard building setback requirements. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12(A) Accessory Buildings . .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet for the proposed detached garage at its closest point to the front yard property line along Winsdale Street North. To allow for the construction of a detached garage next to the existing home. 1815 Hillsboro Avenue North (Map 20) (01-8-34) Thomas and Jane Toleno, Applicants Request: Purpose: Request: Purpose: Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback . .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Avenue North. . 12.3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 22.7 feet for the proposed deck addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Avenue North. To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a deck addition to the front of the existing home. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setback . 6.8 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 8.2 feet for the existing home and for the proposed deck at its closest point to the north side yard property line. To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a deck addition to the existing home. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12(A) Accessory Buildings . 15 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the existing freestanding deck at its closest point to the front yard property line along Wheeler Boulevard. . 3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 feet for the existing shed at its closest point to the front yard property line along Wheeler Boulevard. . 7 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 3 feet for the distance between the existing freestanding deck and the existing shed. To bring the existing freestanding deck and shed into conformance with accessory building setback requirements. 3 6837 Winsdale Street North (Map 15) (01-8-35) Nathan and Tess Lillv, Applicants . Request: Purpose: Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback . 7.9 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 7.1 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the west side yard property line. To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setbacks. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12(A) Accessory Buildings . The detached garage is not located completely behind the existing home as is required by the City Code. To bring an existing detached garage into conformance with Accessory Building setback requirements. 1401 June Avenue South (Map 10) (01-8-36) Thomas and Barbara Deans, Applicants Request: . Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setback . 3.17 feet off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 9.58 feet for the proposed garage at its closest point to the north side yard property line. . 2.1 feet off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 10.8 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the south side yard property line. To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setbacks and to allow for the construction of a new attached garage to the existing home. 1117 Pennsylvania Avenue North (Map 16) (01-8-37) Jim and Kathv Mancell, Applicants Request: Purpose: III. Other Business . IV. Adjournment Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback . 8.05 feet off the required 13.05 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the proposed garage at its closest point to the north side yard property line. To allow for the construction of a new attached garage to the existing home. 4 Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals e July 24, 2001 A regular meeting of the Golden Vally Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, July 24,2001, in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Acting Chair Sell called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Those present were members Cera, Hughes, Lang, Sell and Planning Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were staff liaison Dan Olson recording secretary Lisa Wittman. Absent were members McCracken-Hun edberg II. The Petitions are: I. Approval of Minutes - June 26, 2001 MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Hughes and motion c the June 26, 2001 minutes as submitted. Request: , Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks e e i ed 35 feet to a distance of 28.5 feet for the r and deck addition at its closest point to the rty line along Zealand Avenue North. Purpose: he construction of a dormer and deck addition to the e. dated July 18, 2001 and stated a very similar variance was n 1985 for a garage addition and a room addition. He stated build the garage, but did not build the room addition in the front venue. He stated the applicant now wants to construct a dormer he existing home instead of the previously requested room addition, questing the same setback variance. Terrance Curley, Applicant, stated he has a boring fa9ade on his house and would like to enhance the aesthetics and would also like to protect people who use that entrance from the elements. e Lang asked the applicant if he had a photograph that might show what is being proposed a little more clearly. Curley stated that he did not have a picture, but wanted to point out that the neighbor's home sticks out further than the dormer he's proposing would. Shaffer stated that he noticed that with the proposed addition, the house would line up exactly with the neighbor's house. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals July 24, 2001 Page 2 i' Cera stated that the variance request is identical to the variance requested 16 years . ago. e MOVED by Hughes, seconded by Lang and motion carried unanimously to approve the variance request for 6.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 28.5 feet for the proposed dormer and deck addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Zealand Avenue North. 1935 Xerxes Avenue North (Map 1) (01-7-18) Dan Thvken, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd . .4 feet off the required 35 ~ existing home at its clos along Xerxes Avenue ce of 34.6 feet for the e front yard property line Purpose: To bring the existing building setbacks. forma nee with front yard Req uest: .21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks quired 4.5 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet for the n porch at its closest point to the north side erty line. ff the required 11.4 feet to a distance of 7.5 feet for the stairway/landing at its closest point to the south side property line. e nng the existing 3-season porch into conformance with north ide yard building setback requirements and to allow for the onstruction of a stairwayllanding to the south side of the existing home. Olson referred to his memo dated July 17, 2001 and reiterated that the front and the north side variance requests are for the existing building and the south side variance request is for a stairway/landing addition to the existing home. Dan Thyken, Applicant, stated that he would be replacing the existing staircase located on the south side of the house with new construction. He stated the only changes he would like to make to the stairway is to make it a little wider, so he could incorporate a landing that would provide access to the front of the house. e .. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals July 24, 2001 Page 3 . Shaffer asked if they would still have enough room there if they ever wanted to put a garage in the backyard. Thyken stated that there is a garage in back already but that it is essentially unusable because there's not enough room to turn a car around. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve .4 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.6 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Xerxes Avenue North an et off the required 4.5 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet for the existing 3-seas t its closest point to the north side yard property line and 3.9 feet off the r feet to a distance of 7.5 feet for the proposed stairway/landing at its 0 the south side yard property line. Request: . 7 (A) Front Yard Setback e iwfeet to a distance of 34.6 feet for the sest point to the front yard property line ard Purpose: g home into conformance with front yard Request: ; Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks et off the required 12 feet to a distance of 8 feet for the posed garage and room addition at its closest point to the west side yard property line. . To allow for the construction of a room and garage addition to the existing home. Olson referred to his memo dated July 17, 2001 and stated he had nothing further to add. Lang stated that it seemed like it would be difficult to utilize the proposed garage, as there is a large tree there. Jess Toutges, Applicant, stated that the tree is about three feet from the corner of the house and would probably have to be taken down with the construction of the garage. e Cera asked if the room addition would extend any further than the garage. Toutges stated it would not. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals July 24, 2001 Page 4 . Cera asked what the City's policy is about double garages versus single garages. Shaffer stated that the policy has been that not having a second stall is a hardship, but not having a third stall is not a hardship. . Sell asked about the design of the proposed construction. Toutges stated they haven't designed it yet. Shaffer stated given the minimal intrusion into the side yard setba go along with the proposal. Olson referr currently a right-of-way impro . o approve .4 orne at its closest feet off the required addition at its closest MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.6 feet for point to the front yard property line along Wayzata Boul 12 feet to a distance of 8 feet for the proposed gar e point to the west side yard property line. 1501 June Avenue (Map 10) (01- David Alan A licant Request: .21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback quired 35 feet to a distance .of 15 feet for the at its closest point to the front yard property line ath. e Purpose: he construction of a new home with a porch and deck I Path. o dated July 17, 2001 and stated that this property is lot on a corner. He stated that Bridal Path is a dirt path that is a City ?there are no plans right now by the Public Works Department to Shaffer asked if Bridal Path were to be vacated what the side yard setback requirement would be. Olson stated that he hadn't calculated those setbacks but stated that the path is used to do maintenance on a pump station that is located there. Dave Alan, Applicant, stated that they are still in the process of designing the home and stated that he has been working with AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator, to save as many trees as they can. Sell asked how the driveway was going to work on the north side. Alan stated the driveway would be on the south side and showed the Board a preliminary sketch. e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals .. July 24, 2001 Page 5 e Lang asked the applicant if he had looked at other ways to build the house on this lot that wouldn't require the requested setback variances. Alan stated that he had looked at other options but because the lot curves and because Bridal Path is at an angle it's difficult to get a house to fit there. Donna Huber, 1420 Alpine Pass asked what the distance would be between her house and the proposed new house. Alan stated that there would be a 30 foot setback to the rear yard property line and they are going to save as many trees ible. MOVED by Lang, seconded by Cera request for 20 feet off the require home at its closest point to the Id be hard to pedestrian w the City wants Shaffer stated that typically his answer would be no, but in t . justify a front yard setback along Bridal Path because basi path and it wouldn't be that much of an imposition and i things to look. Hughes asked the neighbor, Ms. Huber, if she was 0 stated she was concerned about the area sta . that she is not opposed to it. Alan stated that at is that he wants it to stay that way. to the proposal. Huber e a the loss of the trees, but at's unique about the area and e 'I€arried unanimously to approve the a distance of 15 feet for the proposed erty line along Bridal Path. 1817 Spring Valley, Tim Johnson A Request: Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks feet off the required 13.8 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the posed garage addition at its closest point to the north side yard property line. To allow for the construction of a garage addition to the existing home. Sell stated that the Board should have received a corrected memo from Olson stating that the applicants request should have been for 8.8 (not 1.6) feet off the required 13.8 feet to a distance of 5 (not 12.2 ) feet to the north side yard property line Olson stated that the variance listed in his memo dated July 17, 2001 actually listed the current setbacks for the existing one car garage. He clarified that the applicant is proposing to add a second stall to his garage, which would reduce the setback to 5 feet e to the north side yard property line. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals July 24, 2001 · Page 6 Tim Johnson, Applicant, stated that his garage is a little over 13 feet wide and 24 feet . deep, which is just a little bit over the typical size of a one car garage. He stated he would like to add 7 feet to the garage because he needs a total of 20 feet for a two stall garage. He stated he looked at building a garage in the back of the house but he didn't want to lose the trees that are there. MOVED by Hughes, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 8.8 feet off the required 13.8 feet to a distance of 5 fe e proposed garage addition at its closest point to the north side property lin Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, . 2 feet off the required existing front yard po property line alon a tance of 33 feet for the osest point to the front yard venue North. Purpose: To bring the exis porch into conformance with front yard building e Request: on 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks the required 15 feet to a distance of 1.3.2 feet for the orne at its closest point to the south side yard property g the existing home into conformance with side yard building ks. Olson referre memo dated July 17, 2001 and stated that the applicants are propos . to b a deck addition onto the back of the house and that the variances requeste for existing conditions. He stated that the applicants have signed a Hold Harmless Agreement in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 2 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 33 feet for the existing front yard porch at its closest point to the front yard property line along Wisconsin Avenue North and the request for 1.8 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.2 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the south side yard property line. e ,~ Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals July 24, 2001 Page 7 e 4812 - 33rd Avenue North (Map 3) (01-7-23) Carolvn Rask. Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings . 7 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 3 feet for the existing gazebo at its closest point to the proposed room addition to the existing home. Purpose: To bring an existing gazebo into confor Building setback requirements. Olson referred to his memo dated July 18, 2001 and sta proposing to build a room ~dition to the rear of th~Jsti construction of the proposed addition would me ali~ tback requirements. However, there is an existing gazebo on the at would have a reduced setback as result of building the proposed ro Sell asked if the gazebo sentimental value an solidly built on the ba d if it could be anywhere else on 'that the addition could not be placed ay. Cera asked if the applicant was n as well. Rask stated that there would nly a crawl space. e Shaffer asked what the purpose of the the house. Mark Rask, the applicant' anywhere else because of trees intending to add a basement u not be a basement under th moved. Rask stated that the gazebo has a lot of pproximately 12 footings underneath, so it is very d be very difficult to move. for the 10 foot setback requirement for accessory buildings orage of flammable materials. Sell stated that the storage of and fire equipment accessibility was the original intent. Shaffer n a 10 foot setback follows the state building code. Lang stat if the applicant connected the house to the gazebo there would be no need for the variance in this situation at all. Rask stated that attaching the gazebo with a deck would be a possibility. Shaffer told the applicant that they would have to talk to the building department about the possibility of adding a deck between the house and the gazebo. MOVED by Lang, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 7 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 3 feet for the existihg gazebo at its closest point to the proposed room addition to the existing home. e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals July 24, 2001 Page 8 .' 1315 Tyrol Trail (Map 10) (01-7-24) Susan Getts and Michael Ackerman. Applicants . Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setback · 8.5 feet off the required 12.6 feet to a distance of 4.1 feet for the proposed garage at its closest point to the side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new g existing home. to the Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd . 14.6 feet off the required the proposed garage a distance of 10.7 feet for the rear yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the con existing home. ew garage addition to the Olson referred to his memo date by the Board at the June 26,2 being requested now is for a 01 and stated that variances were granted in r the existing home and the variance e addition to the existing rear of the home. e Shaffer asked the applic they are proposing. The board studied th regarding place y had any further plans showing the floor plan of what , Applicant, gave members of the board a set of plans. discussed various options with the applicants proposed garage. ncerned about placing the garage so close to the side yard ed the applicants if they would be willing to change their plans. Id be willing to alter their plans a little so they wouldn't need to be perty line. Cera asked why they didn't apply for all the variances they needed at the June meeting. Olson stated that in order for them to continue the remodeling of the existing home they could only sign a hold harmless agreement for the house and not for the addition. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Lang and motion carried unanimously to approve 3.6 feet off the required 12.6 feet to a distance of 9 feet at its closest point to the east side yard property line for the proposed garage addition and 13.3 feet off the required 25.3 feet to a distance of 12 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed garage addition. e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals · July 24, 2001 Page 9 . 1700 North Lilac Drive (Map 6) (01-7-25) Lynn St. John. Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback Purpose: To bring the existing home into conform building setbacks. . 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along North Lilac Drive. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. . .2 feet off the required 1 existing home at its cI . 4.2 feet off the requir existing deck at i istance of 11 feet for the . t to e side yard property line. 1.2 t to a distance of 7 feet for the . to the side yard property line. e Purpose: To bring the ex is yard building . d deck into conformance with side Request: on 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the swimming pool at its closest point to North Lilac Drive. he required 5 feet to a distance of 3 feet for the sting shed at its closest point to the north property line. et off the required 5 feet to a distance of 2 feet for the xisting shed at its closest point to the east property line. o bring a proposed swimming pool and two existing accessory buildings (sheds) into conformance with Accessory Building setback requirements. Olson referred to his memo dated July 18, 2001 and stated that the applicant is proposing the construction of a pool. He stated that during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home, attached deck, and two accessory buildings do not meet the setback requirements. e Shaffer asked if MnDot has done any taking of any of this property because of the Highway 100 project. Lynn St. John, Applicant, stated that they haven't, but that they are planning to build a sound wall around the property. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals July 24, 2001 Page 10 ~ Cera asked if the accessory sheds are movable. St. John stated that MnDot has moved them in the past. . MOVED by Cera, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along North Lilac Drive, and for .2 feet off the required 11.2 feet to a distance of11 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the side yard property line, and 4.2 feet off the required 1 to a distance of 7 feet for the existing deck at its closest point to the side yar 'ne, and 15 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the pr ing pool at its closest point to North Lilac Drive, and 2 feet off the re a distance of 3 feet for the existing shed at its closest point to the north and 3 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 2 feet for the existing sh est point to the east property line with the condition that if the accesso' ever taken down they must conform to all setback requirements if they Request: , ubd. 5 (A) Minimum Yard equired 25 feet to a distance of 10 feet for the . g garage at its closest point to the east property e Purpose: he construction of a parking garage for the proposed Inlum development. Olson referr request ha once i~~ebr develop c. n o dated July 18, 2001 and stated that this same variance ught before the board twice before, once in June of 1987 and 998. After those variances were approved, the condominium not constructed. Cera asked why the construction has never happened. Olson stated he wasn't sure why construction has neverhappened. Arlene Dixon, Highland Management Group, representing the owners of Valley Creek Apartments stated that Valley Creek Apartments has an easement over the back part of the property for drainage and stated concerns about the proposed garages creating a dam. Shaffer stated that the plans that the applicant has submitted are the same plans that were looked at in 1998 and the same concerns about drainage were expressed. He stated that the engineer for the project stated that the project would work and that e the garages are setback enough to allow for the water to flow behind the garages. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals ... July 24, 2001 Page 11 . Hughes asked which way the water flows. Lang stated that the water flows south. Shaffer stated it flows to the creek. MOVED by Hughes, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for 15 feet off the required 25 feet to a distance of 10 feet for the proposed parking garage at its closest point to the east property line. e III. Other Business Olson stated that Mahlon Swedberg has resigned as a mem Appeals effective immediately, due to health concerns. H planning to have a special recognition for him at a Cou let everyone know when that would be. IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:27 p.m. . rd of Zoning e Mayor is d that he would 1508 Alpine Pass 11-8-27 Robert Anderson . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner From: Subject: 1508 Alpine Pass (Map 10) (01-8-27) Robert Anderson, Applicants Date: August 22, 2001 Robert Anderson, with property located at 1508 Alpine Pass, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build an entrywayon the front of the existing home. This entryway requires a variance from the following building setback requirements: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the home is for 5.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.9 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Alpine Pass. Previously, this property received two variances. In August of 1995, a variance was approved for this property to bring the existing home into conformance so that a deck could be built onto the rear of the home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant received variances for the home to be located 31.9 feet to the front yard property line along Alpine Pass and to be located 4.8 feet to the north side yard property line. In July, 2000, the property received another variance to build a garage addition onto the side of the home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant received a variance for the garage to be located 5 feet to the north side yard property line. Now, the applicant indicates that he also meant to apply at that time for an entryway onto the front of the existing home. Although this entryway was not drawn onto the property survey at that time, there is evidence in the 2000 variance file that the applicant was applying for this entryway. Because of this, the City is waiving the $50 variance fee and is using the same application form from 2000 for this current variance request. The City's file on this property does not contain the original building permit for the home, but Hennepin County's property record system states that the home was constructed in 1939. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 1508 Alpine Pass Robert Anderson, Applicant .. Valley I I I tV 1'5020) 's par/( l'St. L4()/ eify Of, 'Ii o!> ~., ~&. ..~.oIi '/"'.., ,,",j>>.'t 4 ^"'.~ __ . OOUlSl.... (55Z,J vewish CDmm Center. Sf. Louis f'arK (55/5) .s ptJr~ st. LOll' Cify of ~ O~'tr1.'t,~ -- -- ~\"'~ -- -- ~ -- -- ~ . . '- . ./vised 1/99) Petition Number Gf)-7 - !~/-1 Date Received 11-7_ 00 Amount Received bu. oD ($50 residential - $150 other) - "), 0/,03'" .f PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: I 1308 Al-PI WE ~-8 I Gol..CEN VA'ViA3Y I f'vl N 5~ fa 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: R~ u, A-N~N Name I?OB ~N6 P!yr~. ~ \f~1 Vl1N ~6 Address . . City/State/Zip q732- q29-.-.:f~ 763 - ~77--3t-31 Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): l.-6\ '7 / Bl-a:\<'tOJ -rYRo~ 11:I.U-? I tiENN\FEJJ (bONTy/ Mti 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: / Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this pe.. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. TANDEM (~BJ~) ~C ACOmd'J, fl1~ ~ ~CCUt, BtTTl-t, OFFf(!E- ~ I ~18\tr ' I . I Subd(s). -'(~\C~) ..." , Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons~ necessity, or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or u~able survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a r~gi~- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota.. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the constructi~n will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge.the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ . ~~t?tJ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~~ Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. Jpplicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes ..: properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this eans across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) }jOU(\L,JTs L.FF !<L-tt\)E Comment i /70k:1 jlJD'-P/ UP-fy#.1/p,./Ui (/MIlder 4.lic1iliaual t,ei~ld/P j4hJe doo/. Signatur~/2I\, Ie::., . .......-:.~ Address / ro., f!~il,4. [IJ." fint Name .s t.. ; = \ e 7 w I ~ "'-.Q Comment L ~,..., k 5:. . 6 u!_n:.g... t Print Name Signature ..2J, ,;JJ d "*7 ~ 0 Print Name Lei~ ~\ ~ws Comment ~,....~ Address j!::>--06 A (Ol~ Pa..s;, S I . Signature~ R,. ~s Address Ib\'1. Alpil\e. PotS"'S Print Name Comment Signature Address ....... . . '.." -""':;:0"::'''1-'' -+... .. ,..-- ~i_.--'~' -_ _..a... 1. "~'_""_ ---,.~ I " "...', "., "" I "t::,c""Ar~.~_ " .... -..'C__ fen:'" -, .'Ja~f4.20 ; iN 1~37''w. " , 0 '.. . ;4aI14956 --. L"I~_ '.., La75.21__. II I If f 'i ~1 ..;;'..t t..~ t' ~.'~.' ",1 VI - t I .I l to i ;; <:>> Z 1.7' ~ ~i 0 "37.6 ,- STORY BRICK WALKPUT DWELLING 1508 ALP'NE PASS ,,I -/ 152.3 ..... ...... -A./).!JJ .-tJ;;(N ...., O;u, ...., O'OWo .~~ i- f./) ....,.m. f ,... I , I .. .....' '-. ..., , '1'.t/( " (. '. .. , ).. .' , I I I'$. 1/ ,0 J . I / C. I / . I I I )/ \ . . ~... "-' I . J. petition was in order and surrounding pr. rty owners were notified of the request for . e v .' nces. Mrs. Glover was present to ans ny questions. Mark Grimes gave a brief s .' mary of the requests commenting on .cumstqnces surrounding the already con . tier deck to the rear of the house. M. G ver talked about replacing the rotting de nd cdL1~tructing a structure that would prev m re security for her. She also explained . seience of events on how the decks . re clstructed before obtaining the building~ ;"ermit arid vaince. Chair Swedberg comment .on the. ifficulty to develop this area in Golde,.? alley. 'MIED by Pentel, seconded by ffer and . tion carried unanimously to apprjge the above re~sted waivers (Section 11.2 ubd. 7(A) .' nt and street setback, Subd. 7~{3) east and we$'f;side setbacks). The grante " waivers mad he existing house and newly 'nstructed decks .... I!I)~ an ( ont platform legally nonc - forming. a:{~utes of the Board of Zoning Appeals wugust 8, 1995 Page Two . . rth (95-8-25) CI Lisa Wichmann qlVer of Section 11.21, S . O. 7(A) front setback rfeet to a distance of 29 fem. o bring the existing house ilconformance s constructed onto the rear of th ouse feet off the required conforming deck may be MOVED after, seconded by Pentel and motion carrie for waive,'. !Variance of Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) for 6 feet of 29 feet . allow for the construction of a conforming de,ck on Imously to approve the request e required 35 feet to a distance the rear of the house. Waiver of Section 11. 21, Subd. 7(C)(1) side setback -- 10.2 feet off the requir~d 15 feet to a distance of 4.8 feet. ~QJl~lRl1iiie:i~1(9~ql1f R()6(f}!~~ Request: Waiver of Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) front setback -- 3.1 feet oft the required 35 feet to a distance of 31.9 feet; and Purpose: To bring the existing house into conformance so a conforming deck may be .. constructed onto the rear of the house. The petition was in order and all adjoining property owners were notified of the variance request. Mr. Anderson was present to answer any questions. Staft liaison Mark Grimes gave a brief summary of the staff report pointing out the circumstances regarding the "Hold Harmless" letter. ,. "lutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals ,August 8, 1995 Page Three The Planning Department and Inspections Department had met regarding Mr. Anderson's request for a building permit before the waivers were granted. Staff agreed that because the noncon- formities dealt with the existing hous~ and the proposed deck would be in total conformance and that the applicant had arranged for all the materials to be delivered, the applicant could proceed if a "Hold Harmless" letter was produced. The letter had to state that the applicant would remove the deck if the waivers were not granted. This letter was obtained. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Pentel and motion carried unanimously to approve the request 'for waivers of Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) front setback for 3.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 31.9 feet and Subd. 7(C)(1) side setback for 10.2 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 4.8 feet. ~. Waiver of Section 1" !,t, 1, Subd. 7(A) front setback -- 1.78 feeloff the required 35 feet to i'~;tance of 33.22 feet; and I':; Wai~er of Section~~ .!l~ Subd. 7(8) rear setback -- 19.~5.fe~l1ioff the required 33. 6 fee~io a. stance of 13.64 feet (for the eXIStltOUSe); and Waiver of Seclil11.2 ubd. 7(8) rear setback -- 27.3~et off the required 33.6 feel to a dl nce of 6.25 feet (for the prop ed garage addition); and Purpose: _d. 7(C)(2) side setback ~. ce of 11.42 feet. xisting house i 0 conformance s onto the existing rage. The petition was in 0 er and ~ adjoining property 0 rs were led of the variance request. The applicant was pre '~nt t1swer any questions. ff Liaiso ark Grimes gave a brief summary of the staff ort. '-he Board talked about th " pcatiof the house and neighbor's house in regards to th . roqased addition. They also n th oping terrain. Member Shaffer asked staff if there wa ullty easement along the nort e.. the property. Staff Liaison Grimes commented th . e probably was a utility ease ", or five feet on either side of the property line. The pro addition would not be within t... · e foot utility easement area. MOVED by Pentel, sec ed by Shaffer and motion carried anirTlously to approve the request for waivers as noted ab. (Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) front' setback, Subd. 7(8) rear setback for the existing house and p' posed addition, and Subd. 7(C)(2) side setback to allow for the construction of a garage addition onto the existing garage. . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals July 25, 2000 Page 6 1508 Alpine Pass (Map10)(00-7-29) Robert C. Anderson. Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback. · 10 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 5 feet for a proposed second garage stall. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a second garage stall to be attached to the rear of the existing garage stall on the northeast side of the property. Lang stated the request is to allow for the construction of a second garage stall to be attached to the rear of the existing garage stall on the northeast side of the property. Dold said the existing house is at its maximum width. She noted there is a single-stall garage attached to the house, but the garage is in disrepair and needs work. The applicant would like to construct a second stall, in tandem style, and repair the existing garage. She noted the applicant received a variance in 1995 for the existing house. in order for a deck to be constructed to the rear of the house. Other variances were taken care of at that time. . Robert Anderson, applicant, said he had looked at many different ideas for a second stall garage. He noted the existing house and garage are difficult t~ work with. Anderson told the Board that the proposed garage would not encroach into the side yard setback any further than the existing garage. He believes addition would add value to the house. Lang noted that the applicant has done everything that he can to stay within the City's requirements. MOVED by Polachek, seconded by McCracken-Hunt, and motion carried unanimously to approve the above requested variance. 1711 Rhode.lsland Avenue North Da . and Joan Barnett A licant . Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(2) ---- ---- ./ ./ e Yard Setback. . feet off the required 15 feet distance of 14.8 feet for the t point to the south property line. . To allow for the construction of a k onto the rear of the house. ..~ ~ ~. ~ os il. U,l~ 8~ i . fS .~~ 1'$ .;~ : ;a 1.! jf :l ~I c:> ,; Nl :~\O! ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~-%~i& .~~~. - I Ii I . f'. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. .~ ~.~_. ~. ~I ~ ~ ~ '. '~.I 7.. ~ ~ ~,~ - .. . -* ~ !t ~ , .U\ ;sr~ ~ ~ 3z . ~ lE..ftl__ . . . . . =.ci.goUm_vlt~ Y 8-10-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 1508 Alpine Pass Robert Anderson Robert Anderson, with property located at 1508 Alpine Pass, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for one variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct an entryway onto the front of the existing home. This construction project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance request for the home is for 5.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.9 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Alpine Pass. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. J94.() (;lenwoodAvenue 81-8.28 Denllis Jordan . . . Hey Me orandum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner From: Subject: 3940 Glenwood Avenue (Map 8) (01-8-28) Dennis Jordan, Applicant Date: August 22,2001 Dennis Jordan, with property located at 3940 Glenwood Avenue, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a garage addition onto the existing home. This garage meets all applicable building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicants to sign off on a "HOld Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. . The Hold Harmless form is attached. Mr. Jordan will soon begin construction of the garage. · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 12.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet on the at its closest point to the east side property line for the existing home. The City's file on this property does not contain the original building permit for the home, but Hennepin County's property record system states that the home was constructed in 1950. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 3940 Glenwood Avenue Dennis Jordan, Applicant . . E '" ....:::: !:C 4 ~ J c,. I . 110 4009 . . . ~ ~ 4240 l.aJ +- ~ - . ~~.t'\ 0 . "i~: :::i (/) 0 ~<t;O 7% z (/) .4 Ci C z ~ ~5.5 A\lE .-- "'.0'. y. . ..........- i. ..~. . . . -- (Revised 1/99) " ._~ - ?-''b Petition Number Date Received 7/ltj/o/ Amount Received S/) .OD ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 31 40 &1 en wood Ave. . 2. BZA Petition Date 3. . Petitioner: ')) E"lU 'toJ; 5 Y :JORO A t--J Name 3<1"10 blt\'LwooJ Address c,l2-~5- 33d'i Business Phone A~ Uo'~61 VeAle)' /,141J SS422- City/State/Zip 1G:,'3--2e;1- L 3l ( Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Le-r- ~ ~LOC.i<' I f)6(.\RO\lVALiZ 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: t Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and_drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any . variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity, or hardship whicll provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Propose~ surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- . tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent propertie$ relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. Signature of A, Iicant . I UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice ofthe Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name . mffiTi "rJ \Iv" OR8vt,1-+ Comment 0 +<, C (Y) ~ Signature ~ ~_ . . Address:$ '1:P C)jNW018 ~ Print Name /J d4A-->0 ~.2Z;kd:Pk'/ Comment of:( Signature !~U/- Address tjtJOv~~d:N : Print Name I . '\ Comment ~lL ~Cl hHBrJ:(? X- c;,voPPF{} r??v :5 77~r:{' . I Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . . . . City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals The attached documents are being submitted to conform to my building permit for an attached garage. It's my understanding that the house was built approximately 3 feet from the property line, before the ordinance for the 15-ft. variance. The garage itself is being constructed on the opposite side of the variance issue where I have approximately 70 feet. Dennis P. Jordan 3940 Glenwood Ave. Golden Valley MN 55422 W 612-625-3324 H 763-381-1311 . . . 3'~o ~1~~eA Ave_ Street Address "HOLD HARMLESS' I, DEfJ~1.5 f :SO\'2.I)f!tJ , am requesting thE)} Ci~y of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) b-AtZ-Abc'::: ~\)lnOI\. onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. . -r :J OROA 'P p, Signature -71,,1 01 Date ~ )J~~ City of Golden Valley Staff Signature . ~, .~-~ . J""..... .. . ~ ,'t.' ........-\~ {, " J .. ",; 'I "'~'\. .... , (;, r ll.J J \ ~ "\ ~ ') " <~ i" " I \. \) 'l-- \j Z'\\ .;- - {f) ,. \... .~. ~ " '\: . " "- , t'J -~ :..;.. ......,. ~ "\. " {~ ,---- \ i~ f l\ (\l 'It;. , n.1IliI) r !.~ T II A tt ..,rH1\.\.o 4,J,,-# ~: . " 1 r 8) ,+ ... .~~ "i. v-J-..:)~. t.\". JncLudir...; Re. 7().' ,t ,. ,t ,!'~..~; : \,J I ~_ :f '" ... 2), 79013q . Including r\+ :to:! r llJ. ,'\.; n , , no. ' \ ~\ ~' \~ A ' ~ yLE,N J'YO,/D i'./ V.c- -//0.0 - ,; .. L-~-..""'~ sC'~, -I;; i'~F 'r; e / r1 / r:: r- ,":'d::. /1 . DESCRIP'rr:JN: ?AHCEL "A" That part of the west South 3 Acres of the ] Southeast 1/4 of the : of the Southeast 1/4 \ Township 29, Range 24' County, Mir~~sota9 ly: South 214.3~ feet, as the 'East ..,ancF,We3tliilt lying' South';of.JIU3SELl ADDITION f accord~ng t ( and fi1 E?cmd of recor( of the Register of De. Hennerin County, Minnl Subject'to Roanoke CiJ North 1J feet ~hereof. . PARe EL "B" The Sout.h 211.. 30 feet I along the East'~nc We~ West 1 Acre of the SOt the East 1/2 of the S< the Southeast l/L. of t 1/4 of Section 19, To~ 2L., Hennepin Co~nty, 0 SUbject. to Jlenwoood ; South 33 feet thereof. ~ "- t- ---' -...- C "./ ;;> ,.. ""cvll; .J /--li.:./(;':;. I .,,- I. .--! /4 I .:. 1:. /-1- J ~ .~ ( -I C /2- l'l ......4-.- ~ ' . . . . . . . . . www.ci.goUm.J1~y HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 3940 Glenwood Avenue Dennis Jordan 8-10-01 Dennis Jordan, with property located at 3940 Glenwood Avenue, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a garage addition onto the existing home. This garage addition conforms to applicable building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback requirements. This construction project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 12.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet on the at its closest point to the east side property line for the existing home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. 1001 Tyrol Trail Nortb 01-8-29 Irene Bartram . Bey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 1001 Tyrol Trail North (Map 9) (01-8-29) Irene Bartram, Applicant Date: August 22, 2001 Irene Bartram, with property located at 1001 Tyrol Trail North, is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to replace a porch addition over the existing garage and to build a new fireplace onto the east side of this porch. This. porch addition and fireplace require variances from the following building setback requirements: . . The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part ofa dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 11.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 3.5 feet on the at its closest point to the east side property line for the porch addition and for 12.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet on the at its closest point to the east side property line for the fireplace. Previously, this property received two variances. In September of 1985, a variance was approved for this property so that an attached garage could be built onto the side of the home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant received a variance for the garage to be located 3.5 feet to the east side yard property line. Also, at that time, the applicant indicated that he would not be building anything above the garage. Sometime after this, a porch addition was built above the garage without either a building permit or an approved variance. In August, 1994, the property received another variance to build a room addition onto the rear of the home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. Although this room addition met building setback requirements, a variance was necessary to build this addition since a previous variance had been granted. . The City's file on this property does not contain the original building permit for the home, but Hennepin County's property record system states that the home was constructed in 1'939. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 1001 Tyrol Trail North Irene Bartram, Applicant . " 10 II . . 6 . 3 . z ~ ... <>... 2 au/den 2 "0 . .. .. .... !: .. ~ ... ::; o 0- .. ... z z ii \!; >- .... i:r . II . 17 . IS . 41D2 4D32 _2 . . . . AUG-02-2001 15:28 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 5938109 P.04/06 (Revised 1/99) Petition Number ()I-"-"~q ~. ~/~/ 01 Date Received Amount Received 50_ 0;). ($50 residential. - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 2. 3. --.J 06 I t--JdL+-h TYROL --rAA l"-' BZAPetitionDate ~'"Du~~~ ~I;(.oO I Petitioner; t'R t:"~ E. S. BA~T Ml\I\ Name .J()()l ~o. \Y~()L T~'L A(ddre~s . City/StatelZip _ ct'52:lS:)S-2CcO (1~)311-b~O Business Phone . Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: N/A , 5. legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on surVey): LOT 12 '81...00:.. \0 WEST T't'RQL H \LLS 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: ~gle Fa~ --.,; Double oWe fling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other AUG-02-2001 15:29 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 5938109 P.05/06 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site ptansand drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the bUilding permit issued. \...,L)9Q.> ~CL~ 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statem~nt Of the reasons. necessity, or hardsh~p which pr:ovide groundJS f9r the granting of thi$ waiver. Attach letter. photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of tbQ property must be attached. Proposed lurveys are not a~ceptable. Lhe survey ,,"ust be prepared tw a regis- tered land .uN.yor licensed in the State of Minoesota. Tbe survey must ~bpw all property line., buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the fron~ and side property lines shall be s.,owt). Th~ rear distancl of any buildings froro the property IinQ Will be needed, if in question. Also. the s4rveX should show an ,pproxlmate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relativ~ to the sidets) where the construction will take place. If the survey is I.(gel'.: than 11" x 17", the applicant will supply .even additional copies of the survVy for use by the aoard. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $~. a 0 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. '-~~~ Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, I GRANTED. IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR. THE WAIVER EXPIRES. AUG-02-2001 15:29 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 5938109 P.06/06 . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a comer, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPE~TY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) .. Print Name (;t'.Mf,e~ J. 1J-If<.4c5 Comment T .I1,r. JJ6f1I.Jf> '1H€- Ih"~ 1,.1 tt1e)~~J. r ~(, €'e~.J~ .1JhF fl,cJ.s€. S~naNre ~~~ ~;= &:~ ~'I (;Y. Signature Address /D20c(J. I t ( 7>'. . Print Name Comment Print Name K 0 u ft' (!.Ac MARl A Comment JQ fA,.., f iii d D1, ruj 7~ PrintName .5ile..-/le'i-L -\ }6.1\! l..Ai\\ h~vn2:>lv) , . Comment )1111- ~c.(t'Q/\ po rch i.tvo~IA be ct. h.f'CIIAf:1(:;,./ ordJ't-l-1Cv-\..:\.Ne. ml~ -Jk . Pcelij(;~J ~)L\<~1 ff?~h tiY\~. ~~A- nc p~hb WI:n.. -Ii ~1l' Signature .~ '\1AlJJ~ [Ul~CW.d.L~Address /()]5 I\J .j\/((::.I. .~?\\ I 9"1'0 ~ f~ / I d ~~ Address 9/~ R: Tyr&f T',.. Signature . 1 __ , -' , ... ~-" VPETERS, PRICE & SAMSON LAND SURVEYORS, LTD. 12400 PRINCETON AVENUE SOUTH. SAVAGE. MINNESOTA 55378. 612-890-9201 Certificate Of Survey For JERRY McCABE d'" , ----D ~ ) <:>t. C. .>- ~ J"" I 1 , , , , , I . N /~= 30' o Denotes iron monument set . Denotes iron monument found w. tlereoy certify ~t thlt it . true and COfreet representation of a survey of t/'le boundaries ~ !he above deScribed land. and ~ 1M location of all t)ulJdil'lljlllhereon. and all visible encroachments. if any. from or on said land. . 7 d f .._IYt....m.3/!:.rdayo, ,)r/(y 19Mf~/. ,JJd~ LS. 12 9 -85' Mit1M$Ota Uceose No. /4 g <1 C> 48.05 ~T)f) t 1\0 N \JJ I plL,K "'0 M"'" Np:a..IN I S" Sf,~ ,Vl '<:J ~~ ~~ ~\() .~ ~ ();j , ~t'C) '- --- rzl -<:. ...- I. " 10.0' ~ ~ /(0:..34.3.0 c"'9~ o/'B;1. -'" ------ NORTH TYROL ,f--.- '" ,3.1; I , "'- "" ~ I \ 50 L7 -......... 1f,.O 29. r. / Z9. 95M. I () ~ \ ' ,~. . -- - TRAIL LOT 12, BLOCK: 10 WEST TYROL HILLS . . . Board of Zoning Appeals City of Golden Valley August 1, 2001 Dear Committee Members, June, 1998 I purchased a home located at 1001 North Tyrol Trail. During the past winter of2000-2001 the roof of the attached garage developed a number ofleaks creating a mold condition. After significant research and an $18,000 investment I contracted with Knutson Construction to remove the decking located on top of the garage and replace the rusted tin roof underneath it. Upon further investigation, it was determined that the existing screen porch was sitting on top of the decking and therefore also needed to be demolished to replace the garage roof. The presence of the screened in area was a significant factor in the selection of this home as it offered an outside space on a lot with virtually no level backyard. After an additional commitment of considerable dollars I contracted for the screen structure to be restored as it was at the time of my purchase. The contractor filed for the necessary permits with the city. Upon doing so we requested a site visit from the Planning Department as I am desirous of constructing a stone frreplace on the East wall of the porch. This would not only enhance my use of the property but also screen me from my neighbor, as the existing porch and garage, are located only 3 ~ feet from the property line because of a previously granted variance. It was at this time that I learned that a variance had been granted in 1985 for the construction of the garage, however the screened area above it, which shares the same footprint had not ever been brought to the city for approval. It is for this reason that I am respectfully requesting that you allow the rebuilding of the screen porch, which I originally had and permit me to add a fireplace, which would require one additional foot leaving 2 ~ feet from the property line and provide necessary screening from the neighbor to the East. Regretably,.due to previous plans. I will be out of the country for the August 28 meeting but will be represented by my contractor. I am however, available until August 23 to answer any questions you may have or assist you in any site visit you might wish to do. I may be reached at (952)525-2000 days or (763)377-6300 evenings. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. ,S;),JUA_9.J~~~~ Irene S. Bartram . Board of Zoning Appeals City of Golden Valley August 2nd, 2001 Dear Committee Members, We are writing this letter to address the construction of a screen porch on Irene Bartram's property at 1001 N Tyrol Trail. We have been neighbors of Ms. Bartram for the past three years. We both have screen porches facing each other. Because the city granted variances in the past for these two structures, it allowed for the transfer of sound and a fireplace would act as a buffer of the sound that passed between each structure. We really enjoy being on our porch during the summer and understand how Irene would want to continue using her porch as well. Allowing her to rebuild the screen porch would allow her the same enjoyment as we do. In addition the screen porch adds to the beautification of the neighborhood. . We are very supportive and are in favor of the addition. &~tfully, . . . m<:i C. . W J2t1 ".:"....,.... p} U-rvv;t~ Anthony and Shelleye Williamson 1015 N Tyrol Trail Golden Valley, MN 55416 763-381-0899 . Board of Zoning Appeals Page 2 September 10, 1985 . WH on the sidered a (25 feet). from every appearance this side would appear to be a side lot line based nfiguration of the lot as it relates to the Zoning Code, it is c r lot line and requires 20 percent of the lot depth for sack esent kitchen This addition ; therefore, there is a rd where the addition is fence and it would not be very addition would add some room to th and dining area and the r onder is a three-season. por faces the rear yard of the a nt neighbor to the considerable distance between hou The entir proposed is enclosed in a board-on~bo riv visible to adjacent neighbors. Mr. Conley provided the Board with s proposed and also the waivers for the se as it now exists. Mike Sell n as part of his motion that t' is a corner lot with two 35 foot setbacks uired, that if thesetba as a sideyard, 15 feet would be required and the p1eted is 22 feet and Sell also noted the topography an her space on the lot. t leppik seconded the motion and upon vote carried unanimously. . 85-9~2 (Map 10) Residential !9P1 North Tyrol Trail ~era1d A. McCabe The Petition is for waiver of Section 3A.06(3)a side setback, for 11.5 feet off the required 15 foot side setback-to a distance of 3.5 feet from the ~ast lot line to the proposed garage addition. Mr. McCabe was present. Consent had been obtained from all adjacent properties. No others were in attendance. Mr. McCabe had photographs of his home and he described the existing house and the lot topography. The lot is an extreme example of difficult topography and typical of this area. It slopes up steeply to the rear and side and the present tuck-under garage is entered from the side of the house. A large retaining wall at the rear and the side provides for entry to the garage at a sharp right angle to the street. Mr. McCabe descri bed to the Board, in detail, the use of the present retai ni ng wall in conjunction with new footings and foundation to enclose the new garage addition, which would be entered directly from the street. . Board of Zoning Appeals Page 3 September 10, 1985 . Margaret Leppik asked if any construction would take place above the garage and Mr. McCabe said IInoll, but there will be a facade to match the existing roof of the house to retain the present architectural character.istics. The Board also was provided with detailed plans which were examined and discussed thoroughly. Mahlon Swedberg expressed his concern about the width of the garage. Mr. McCabe said it was proposed to be built in the area within the retaining wall and because of the extreme topography, it was needed to meet the structural requirements. The garage was described as not actually having an interior dimension in width of 26 feet as the retaining wall and foundation are approximately two feet thick and additional construction where added to the existing house, leaves an interior of about 23 feet. Mr. McCabe noted the extreme topography up toward his neighbor to the east. He noted that if the lot were flat the proposed garage addition may have some impact but in this case the garage is tucked into the embankment and because of the hill has relatively no effect on the neighbor and they approve of the proposal. The Board noted that at the very east edge of the garage it would also require a waiver of 4.3 feet from the required 35 foot front setback because of the curve of the front lot 'line. Mahlon Swedberg questioned the use of two doors rather than one large door. Mr. . McCabe responded the purpose of two doors was for esthetics to preserve the English Tudor characteristics of the home and the neighborhood. At the close of discussion, Mike Sell moved to approve the waiver as requested and in addition the 4.3 feet off the required 35 foot front setback at the corner of the east lot line to the garage at its closest point. In his motion, Mike Sell noted the extreme topography at the rear and sides and no other reasonable alternative. Sell's motion was seconded by Margaret Leppik and upon vote carried unanimously. The Petition is 3A.06(1) front setbac , 35 foot setback to from the to The petitio n order, consent had been obtained from all adjac pro No adjacent owners were present. Mr. and Mrs. Herchenbach re present to explain their proposed garage addition. . . . . Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August 9, 1994 Page Eight Th tition was in order and, consent obtained from the adjacent property owners. Mr. oer was present to anSwer any questions. No other interested persons were in att \ ance. Mr. Ounder/-explained that the proposeed addiiton would be con- formi ng . that he ahd bien here once before for a vari ance so he was requi red to come a for this ryew addition. Durign the course of applying for this waiver he d overed that he needed a second waiver for the existing structures front setback MOVED by tkCrack approve the petit -Hnt, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to of Section 11.90, Subd. 4(C)(4) and Subd. 7(A). 1001 No. Tryol Trai 1 (94...8..39) Dr. Bruce Meese/Maureen Murphy Request: Waiver of Section 11.90, Subd. 4(C)(40 which states that a new variance must be granted for an addition to a structure whe.n a previous variance has been granted. Purpose: To construct a conforming two-story addition onto the home. The petition was in order and consent obtained from adjacent owners. Dr. Meese was present to answer questions. No other interested persons were in attendance. Dr. Meese started with explaining that his proposal was to put a conforming addi- tion onto the rear of the house but that since a previous variance was given in 1985 for a sideyard setback, he was required to request another waiver. Member Johnson asked Dr. Meese tfhe was aware that during the 1985 waiver discussion tt was stated that nothing would be built on the roof of the garage. During the visit to the site for this petition it was noted that a screened porch is now on the roof. This screened porch was built without a permit. Dr. Meese stated that the 1985 petition was made by the previous owner. Dr. Meese was not told when he bought the house that he could not build a porch on the garage. He was also unaware that a screened porch would require a butlding permit. He built the porch himself. Member r~cCracken-Hunt stated that as far as the waiver on the petition goes, there has been 9 previous waiver granted and now a conforming addition is being proposed. MOVED by Johnson, seconded by Swedberg and motion carried unanimously to approve the petition for a waiver of Section 11.90, Subd. 4(C)(4) Which states that a new variance must be granted for an addition to a structure when a pre- vious variance has been granted. 905 Hampshire Avenue South (94-8-40) BLR, Inc. -- Cactus Creek Saloon & Steak Outfitters Request: 6, Subd. 6(A) which requires a 35 foot front for 2 feet off the required 35 foot front setback feet; and 11.36, Subd. 6(A) which requires 35 feet of front ed green area -- variance for 4 feet off the required 35 stance of 31 feet; and . . . . . . WWW.ci.goUro-JI~ Y 8-10-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 1001 Tyrol Trail North Irene Bartram Irene Bartram, with property located at 1001 Tyrol Trail North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for 2 variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a porch addition and fireplace onto the existing home. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 11.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 3.5 feet on the at its closest point to the east side property line for the porch addition and for 12.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet on the at its closest point to the east side property line for the fireplace. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. - 4515i .El1.atelainTerrace 01-8-30 Ted Lang . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: From: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 4515 Chatelain Terrace (Map 8) (01-8-30) Ted Lang, Applicant Date: August 22,2001 Ted Lang, with property located at 4515 Chatelain Terrace, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant had approached the City to build a porch and room addition onto the existing home. This porch and room addition meets all building ~etback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was. submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet . setback requirements. The following is the variance requested: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code. states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance requested is for 0.18 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.82 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Chatelain Terrace for the existing home. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in January of 1951 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . Subject Property: 4515 Chatelain Terrace Ted Lang, Applicant . 8Z5 .......... ..4';0.. ( FLOYD B. OLSON ----~---~--~------~-- :t . . . 1 , -------1------- 4725 ,'.S I" ."" . /f5 : 4949 . 1~(J.9Z '\ 41-'7 /zS". 4901 . 2.7S 4825 , . , , . . . (Revised 1/9~) Petition Number Date Received ~ Amount Received 5""0,00 ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: '15"/~ Ctf-4-reZ-~4tV T6-?-~ 2. BZA Petition Date f! / l /0 I , 3. Petitioner: 7 e;1) L~c- NmS- Cif-~ ~ r;. 1/ MIJ 5"~7"L<- A dress ""> "J . City/State/Zip 2- S~g-. ///~ ~5, 3 ~ .~Lr3' Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): '-IS-I/) CflA751-A-IJU Te:7~- 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: X Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling I nd ustrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s} involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. E)( ($ r I A.J €r Sl!l-l.{(... TU l2e: H Jr\ OIJIZ" c.ojl.-AJ e:1L-- T /fAr r / S 34 , g-~ Far FRo~ fiZoAJr rR~pe12--n L{J.JC S/B 3S-f'~ . 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- . tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be slJown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the surVey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this apQlication are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in.the amount of $ 60.00 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~a::~v~ UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED,IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about th.e request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name~ - \ 0- " "Q:... ~, L'\ cia... Comment Signatur<~~ Address <-{::)G \ C ~~'("'..,\~~ (C. Print Name ~VNA.J 0H;v.5 D JJ . Comment . Signatul!l h~---. A(ldl!lss '160) cJ4de...-:. ~ PrintName !A)pljJ~'~. c!YV+~c_V T\ ( Comment , Signa1ur[3~_ ~dI!lSS. 'J (.------.., '~~~ Sign're- / ~~ Address .339 b~~fI /)t!. Print Name Comment .-.., f"'7"1 ' 1 >.4-11+ votJ~H 1>(TW Signature c:-- ~... ;> \--~ Address U 5~L' c?,y..j4~.4, Print Name (J:.J....lL--r---.~.. ~~'~.7-z e _ A--~ (!) ~ <J 7' Comment Signature~~.. ~ I~ ,~ ~Addres9:::3 Y-/ / '--- Print Name Comment ~Id t ~(J -\,IIfJLl vrttJuMtL ~~. fig tJ. Signature Address S.~5 .~~ ~ Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Add ress . . . -- --- ~ /'" "0 / ,,/ , , , , , FENCE CORNER 0.32 fEET " EAST OF PROPERTY UNE- J - DAN-BAR HOMES, LTD. SURVEY FOR: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4515 Chatelain Terrace. Golden Valley, Minnesota. CHATELA//11 TERRACE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ii Lot 18, Block 4. GLENDALE, according to the recorded plat thereof and situate In Hennepin County, Minnesota. I I I :\11 :z I I I NOTES: 1. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the north line of Lot 18, Block 4, GLENDALE, which is assumed to have a bearing of North 87 degrees 52 minutes 08 seconds West. 2. The area of the property shown hereon is 15,464 square feet or 0.3550 acres. III -', FOUND IRON CERTIFlCA TION: I hereby certify that this map was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 9th day af July, 2001. '!/>..z'..- "........ I>-fq~" 29.2.. .,/~,. ;; EXISTING 1-STORY ;" WOOD BUILDING ;0; ,<4515 CHATELAIN TERRACE;. ~ , /' ///// 32.0'/ /~'//. 2S.6/// o N Iii - by: Jackf Bo'1ke,. Minnesota License No. 20281 7415 Wayzata Boulevard, Minneapolis, Mn. Telephpne: (952) 546-6837 t9~31 E~:~l~=.._j'-~ :' (TO BE RElOCATED) ~ : I, PROPOSED 'I BUILDING.. ~ ADDITION , , " " " . ... - PROPOSED SCREENEll PORCH ('o.Ox'O.O) 3. No tile work was furnished for the preparation of this survey to verify the legal description or the existence of any easement or encumbrances. 65.00 \ S87'41'46-E \0. -FENCE CORNER 0.21 FEET SOUlH OF PROPERTY UN[ FENCE CORNER 0.08 fEET , NORlH OF PROPERTY UNE- J , , , FENCE CORNER 0.85 FEET " /. <.. V. h EAST OF PROPERTY UNE- -, _ ~ \.. '- w~~ l' -- ~Jj FOUND , ~ IRON '\ '" -FENCE CCANER 0.83 FEET SOUlH OF PROPERTY UNE 131 DENOTES GAS METER IS DENOTES ELECTRIC METER III DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX "0. DENOTES POWER POLE )f--Ot-l( DENOTES FENCE -\\lRE- DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE .lECEH.D 2542 - 61 4782 . o 30 60 90 SCALE IN FEET EGAN FIELD & NOWAK SURVEYORS INC 7415 WAYlATA BOULEVARD . IoIINNEAPOUS, MINNESOTA mE: (952) 546-6B37 30116R . . . . . . . . . . wwmd.gOMm.vlt~ Y . 8-1 0-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 4515 Chatelain Terrace Ted Lang Ted Lang, with property located 4515 Chatelain Terrace, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a porch and room addition onto the existing home. This proposed porch and room addition meets building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback requirements. This CO!1struction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code . states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance requested is for 0.18 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.82 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Chatelain Terrace for the existing home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . SlS.....Cloverleaf..J)rive 01~8-31 .Jim Martens . . . Hey Mem randum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 515 Cloverleaf Drive (Map 8) (01-8-31) Jim Martens, Applicant Date: August 22, 2001 Jim Martens, with property located at 515 Cloverleaf Drive is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a deck addition onto the existing home. This deck meets all applicable building setback. requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicants to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless form is attached. Mr. Martens will soon begin construction of the deck. . The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for 14.35 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20.65 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Cloverleaf Drive for the existing porch and for 11.08 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 23.92 feet at its closest point to the front property line along Cloverleaf Drive for the existing home. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in January of 1956 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 515 Cloverleaf Drive Jim Martens, Applicant . ;!:;~:: ~... " 844.4 (na!)" 5211 5201 'il: . I~ " - -, .~-. ~''l~J:l.. " \~'It~~ . ~.'o . ~ do 11: r i ~. 'Db' z TE . . . (Revised 1/99) . . Petition Number l) , - 8 - 3- t Date Received 8/7 /01 . Amount Received 6 50 ~ ex, ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 515CJ6\J~ DQ..l0~ 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: J, ~'\ Nam,e. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: s'-\r.. '\E=- . 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): loT \ I ~O(.t 3 C\u)B2-\~TffettcC 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: L Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional . Other Bus. & Prof. Office 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. . J~f: Cc)e.~eJG 'O~ hoJ~ {-:jOtS \N-to ~()~Tf.;\' ~, 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached.' Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regi~- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must. show all property lines. buildings, and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, . if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to ,the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. , . UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION'~ LlCABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this . means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s} of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told abouUhe request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name De h n I ;, LV ..~ ')vJ t It y4;- Comment "/ Signature ~'r~ Addres$ 532~~Jk. f , ~~L'Le7' rt~"J Print Name-Df Ii" Ia. F: P:Ct~ e (.l ~ . . Comment . Signature Ah-dt.=f./lttu Address g~(il~L/i-fr~+"F ,V?-- 'Go /clJiwt>/ ti~lt~ t ?~~ J~~e~<~) ?eo~e~ ,A- .TO i-L:) ~fI(? Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment ?~ 73 fr'vlf/L I' Signature rp~, 7?~ , Address ~,) "'f C.c.ov~ r')tL (pJ\&" v~lL, MJJ 5J'-t2-2 . Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment SyL V //1 ~/ S ff J~1 /) J/ . ~-o 0 CLc Vi; ){? . Signature o/~C1YZ~<'Address 000 - Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment: Signature Print Name Comment Signature . ~. Address Address Address Address . . . BOUNDARY SURVEY OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3, CLOVER LEAF TERRACE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA (515 CLOVERLEAF DRiVE) o~ ..,. '-----~~_ ~J;~D)" Ol_eifl.z'J~'" -_ Po "eJ fro JecK- -~- - - ~M {s 0J ~<v<l;- 'va G ::-..ur L_____~----- s_w2tll.1lI1Ml . LEGEND SE18ACK INFORWAlION I PllIOIllDAtNEXCAV"'1IClN0'IINER,fCOlIIItACttIltTO'tIENJ"YUNDERCftOUND u1LlllE:s 'MtK GOPfIOl STAlt CItE CAll. 5~1_4!i"'lIlXl2 M., _0 u .. m' .. -,- M .. ... '"""'" SNtfARYSElIEIt MNIHCI.C WIolERVAI.\E -.... """" ..... ....."" O\'ERHlIDU1IJtyUNES tlENOTES UEASUllElI DINEMSION PEfllI6 $UR\€Y 0EN0tt$ RECORDQIMl"..NSlON ASPER THE PlAT OF Ct.<NDIUN'1tllFlACE Sf;TSUftIlET..OMUMlNr....vtKm"KEVf'Sl184l17" """""" ...... UlNEO:!iINGlEFAMIl."'.IlE5IDEH'lIAl FRONT J5FErr REM ISFIET ..'" RESlDDlCIS fIa' PDMOUS to 0JRIlENT ztNNG ~ WOl,lU) IE C:CiN!lDOlQ) ORRlDF'A'IHEREO .. .. LEO.lot1.1' NON CONFOIUNG. SE18ACXlMFtIbIA1IllN PEJlc:nvOFGOL.IlEMVAUEY I'tMNIC DEPT. --- (l[ffTAC1PSlSON,OAN ~o r:"'"l ~ LJ OENOlESeotcRE1ESVRF"ACE D!MOlES~SlJRF"'C[ "'"" PfllORtoNfYCOHStIlUC1JOHO'MfEJIfC(lN1RACTORlO CO!m.y IIlH IHE OTY Of 0CIl.lIEN V.ll1LY DEOC PEl'lIliT f1tllUlRDlENf$. ..............""""" 7tOO GOI.OEN YAUn ROAO =~H~=7 PllEPAfltDFOII: """"'-< """" $Tlla.ovutlUl'llRI'€ OOUlENVALlEl'.~'" PHtlIfE: 183-54&-7797 KEMPER & ASSOCIATE LAND SURVEYING. ENGINEERIN( ?ZIOUl._y...... MIll" IIlICUltOlt,_Auue 1IlI.-al-cll111 Fn.l-e3....... CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY . A". (If ()/o1az/E71F Ik,/~ Street Address . "HOLD HARMLESS' I, jp,,~JlIl...f , am requesting the City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) (JOrC/(,., "'- dd (fi o~ onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. . ( I nature ?lIt /ell Da / J.) tJvr- 0 ~ City of Golden Valley Staff Signature . '> . . " . . =w.d.goMm_vlt~ Y 8-1 0-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 515 Cloverleaf Drive Jim Martens Jim Martens, with property located 515 Cloverleaf Drive, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for 2 variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a deck onto the rear of the existing home. This proposed deck meets building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, it was discovered that the existing home and front porch do not meet building setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for 14.35 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20.65 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Cloverleaf Drive for the existing porch and for 11.08 feet off the required 35 feet toa distance of 23.92 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Cloverleaf Drive for the existing home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28,2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. 1316 Kelly Drive ()1-8~32 Joeal1dSuelorster . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner From: Subject: 1316 Kelly Drive (Map 15) (01-8-32) Joe and Sue Forster, Applicants Date: August 22, 2001 Joe and Sue Forster, with property located at 1316 Kelly Drive, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants had approached the City to build a front porch and room addition onto the existing home. This porch and room addition requires the following variances from building setback requirements: . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance requested is for 4.64 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 30.36 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Kelly Drive for the proposed porch addition. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 1.2 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.8 feet at its closest point to the north side property line for the proposed room addition. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in September of 1953 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 1316 Kelly Drive Joe and Sue Forster, Applicants .' . :.~ I' _M...,....... QI - , ~,,~~i ~~l · 1-" ZI~'5" I "."......... ~.., -Ii! 'i Ii ". 100 I,,,. rrI.,,,,~ ei: i ~~.~ ... "\::. J!O l...I! ,"'f;~ L "INt!~ · !<:l!':.ANssELl n~~!?:~ ~ I ~ i~ z -." lD;~ ~8!41t~. : j "i"i-: "'~=T"'~r" \ ~~ t .".~ '-6/~~ a i ~1 !~. 1 ~-, ~~.~ '. \ .. ',,(310 !:!:.r ""~71, l/~:""'" .t! !(J~I ~~~ u"l ~ ~ft41~ "'_: 4~4~: 4"'i 4t...14~ 40 I ~ >> : 5l"!',: ~.!31; 3~ !4' 33 : 3 31J :'...1 Z7 Z~ :Z~~; ~," .'''''4''.0 :,.'!'>OLYMPlA"..'!;' ...,,7. ,,". "'..' lit: at ::,t' 1 ~ 1 ~' I~: ~~!... ;;f. d. ~. a:.. .. ~ . I 931. ~ "'0 SIU/' "K." S1,Z-II'k".4.ll."~ on ~o:..-. .._I. 1.._ . I._I - ,. 50 r~ '" .8.15 ~;, ....... .~!. .~;. . s. ;uii , ' 'v ..,' _ 7205 ~""'P' ,. ,'1JH.fI 1'," '" . i,,' 12M' ~ "'; ,.... 14(,.4,:iit ..' ' ~....".,..,,~ ~..." ~ Ol ,,..ft'A6824 6800 6746 67$8 61.30 ~ 4 J'5-51"Zo. 'I) d. .... Q Jl. . /.~J-..'~. '~~(J ~ ~ ., ~G,.;''''\t 69Q..S "IIi ~ ~..., y;'"J 681T 6801 674$ 613' 672 ~;::o ,I r~~~.1 lL.(J'Z ;l"."fti .~.t.S~~4ulra. -...t..\-.... ..~ '1"...j"IO;--;'''' rn.1~ ~ .". ':~' I~;:' I'''' ....- 'n.. r/;rl SD~ 14'5& .1'V_,465 ~, I~'{~ Z -:: .... :Sf"';;it :;1! ._~ :;l1..il! I. ;. ;; I 1 = I:; ~ ! 34 ~~~2~'1~~' ~.3 0"'0 " ..'\. ~ ~"Il;" -.it .~~, 4'~ 50 5'. 52,,!,~ ,1.. S~ ~:~ Sl~~ E.!-ENA I a"'tS,~ ,~~ '4J' ""l" '8)'~ ~ 11'" ~ Ill. 4li~' ,,,,4, '~r .~" ~~ r1rN.,.J4 ; ~\ t ~ 3 ~~ 4. ~ ~\. 4", : ~o~ I.~ : ;;. .r. ~~ V"EW'll!~~ ~~. .~. ;. S,. ;:. .~' .. ~ . '. ~~I i'" ..", ,..If II iIi ~rslr1l:1 126 ~- : ,0 ...., ~ . ~.. "::: .. ~"Z ;; ~ 0 . N" . 0" -..' . " " .. ~ . /00 177'" ~ 060, ,.. ~ <.. hit'" "'.w : -; I Q l:!l I .Jpl : ~ L- ~I J, I;;; i:l! .: ~I .:! -13.' 'T _~-'- ~n PA:T ,1.'Ii~'/; ~~ R~ ~wt:~:r ~ \::.J'.y:~. t 14~;l43_ 14{\1 t.\14; 1~'~:~.r::"!Ja< '" ,..- "l~~l'.i" "iim J:". ""Ill"l" . t Q) <> OF, _, I"" '.-\ I .~... ~r;-"3 . ~. ~ .........' t~. ,"'>F-.' ~. .::: .1i · 'q .'. ; I\/~ N . ~.. I--L01:_JS_1-"- [';u 1.\ It I ! 'n_ ~';9 r..:! ,."" .. 'tsl~ so .'!' .~~. ~'!!' . l~ c( - ., , i:~ ..' .'!t - "'.; .. 1'; . i.-';' . , qrl~'" ~I ~ " "" .. .., .. 1 ~ :: K 5 + 1 . ~.. 0 ' 7OS0 7/120 Tlf(J8 6!1$B Ji9J6 6906 6B 68/2 6800 6742 6730 P ',.. FOR ... ~ ....... ",,";; 1 ~.I z;; RU", ZIG :; ~ '" ?057 7OS7 70/9 ;000/ 695/ 69$5 692/ 6905 6809 6747 6743 87S 6, m ...:.... II. +. , ,^ c 1'I.~i' '" l-~I .! -'~~' '-' -;j 1.L",!:,1 - .~t~. ~8,'5 "-!'N . I 's - 1~~1E "~. ._. ..~l L""I! . ~'; ~ .;-~: ~ ~AD4.0~1~IO'~N.:~~~ \4?\ i~' ;:;4 114~~ ~i5.lrt:li!~~'''~~II~;j4iIS~bS' ~IS1~ IS!.!,J '~J"fl,;r-T,r.~"4\'~~.' "~,,f I '. ~. 1~"1.f'''' _ _- - ~' " a. .~~"I-Nl ".Ii"'''.::;Y'~ ~ ... .~I;;<" .,,: . J;;i. . ~;o .~ -+ '., :it ". "\.1' 1'1 ~ ","q.;-', 14Q,;'.aSl ..~I! ~'il. iI.;5!~ '.. '.al50-~ ~~05 .il. "~. .5: ,.ift riio.1 . .. 0 ) ~,/75 In,II...! ""12'/S'W15 TZO ,', . i, ..:.: i I 'AI..! i "" ..J - ij-- N'" '1! .-]1 L · ',. .,~.~...~ ~ .,~;; !!., _ .,1 ~ al~31 hil~~. ~~ a~' . ~ a:' ~ ~I - io ~..ro-Jrll1'f t;; /0 ~ "'~~ ...... ~ F:.; ~..9S ~~:.,..:~;; ~1' ~ 'l4ol~:~U!:tt~~~\IZllitl~IZ~t'15if\ ~~It ~.~I Z)ol l' ~Zf! ,27.,,1 :Z'1115 zZ4lm Z21'121!-. Zlotl~1'a.... I 01.--.. '.~!::: ~ <> "E, r~ ",' '.,:11 I'" ~ "'.......\ 1 l:!I. ~ ~ . I 2 ...:; . 'iG ...:I. e:.':: I':' "180'~ T..':~~;;:- -t .2~ '~HEIGH S 1 il.tt:5"'!"~~' ";j~I.~. ..". 1''l.I~I,.'' ,'I".::!' , 1.:3.,,3. ~,,;.::! ~ :a .!..~ ~l!:i:ll .... ~~~ Z ;;; Is Q 7. _ zl :;: ,'" ... __ 7w4 7V04 6!J50 6SS4 6B2O "U...",.,,"[Z4 680ft 6800 6742 sns6?30 ~ . ,,:.\ ~:>-., ..... ~lt'''' I~" I2S ".. ~ '" _. ~.. _,~, -- ~.- ..~ '!i 6BOB 680/ 6739 6733 ~.~. ~ .]';:..J:.. Ii 2ND ~... ~ ADD. IT ON4'U~f'l"j 'b ,. t l!; so "":::r1", s.~ "'-1"'. ~~ >- ~,.1~1 ~ "I~ 'o,,~: .~. -~I' .~ io=Jutr._- ,+. ,...I. "..<l... ;; 3:- _!!!!!!:; 6' ...~'.~_H:. 'i'. .~j. ~ .1 s. l1Ju~, ':.!f.'';' t:t.';I. e, , ..,s,..,- . s~' -..~~. ~2S.;..!'~~.....\.;; ..~.", ",141IZ'11%0 Z4~15:Z4;t47It~'Z4'Z5olt5iI25~~(/)BI~i 2~1';~1~Z51i15!25;'12'l1z'T1IZ'3Z" .' ;; ..... . . ..) : I3U --: ~.~ ", la" s ,1';1 2 I, ~ ~ I ~ g ::iI i'''; t:; I:; ,; ! "! _. _ _ _.. !:l:l; __ "~.J :l.4.....~~ ~J - 4.!:!~:I 4.._ I.; I,. ,.r.....1 s.'" s. !.ol:;!!... ..."'i..i.,; 50'" ., 1"<:07< ~~~ ::. i"'''' . I . ~ .. I.' . ; ..,..1JarforL~'9 1:partofJifW"" ~';;~ "'''''''E~:i;B 5' 1 ~ I ':-:J ~ 1;, ,~ .. 683f ~ ~..: J \~1:1 i ..!;r 'u, ~ 1. lo""t. I'. I",I.~" ~~w...~~~Elil~!.3ij3 l334"'m:sI:~~~5~5si,:~]'lbu~1~'j1~tS<g:~~1<f-;t~];~11;1i'.';I'lI~ta~I1I'11'i;I~;' if;~ . Q) ~. . ~';, .I.,.~_.' \~4.';; 1,(" is'- =. .~ .... · !ll. .~ ..;!!!!:1~. ~ ..;;1 . ~ E..:. ?}J ~q"9 c. !l!.. ~~~PE.I_'ER ON's "VALLEY!!!' t......J!..;!I.. ..."'<...I.....s.l "'Is. s,~"z,ls. ".l~ SI1-......;.":!. .I.~. ..~zs.ls.;'" !> -:"n",.. Q)~. ...~' ,4 'f .!!! oR 70547024 m04 695() 6934- 6920 PLYMOUTH68OB 6746 67$8 ;: . , ,_'"' -rrr1/~ _I "-5. --t.,~.. ::, 61'41 61 ~~~:.; .... Q) '" . 8~.4""~,,:5~ 2~" ~~. ...2 .;~ li~31lfol' i "'" l:fi" I~::l' I':\>~ ,So. ".,Sj5.,O..l' ,....., "'iii" ,-~' .I.'~' 1;'.<= ~ ~!!!_~ fEW,.'! >-,.\,3Arip..\\ Hz~' l:;;l I Q 1:;1 I=' 'j 1:3 1"iJ 11;1 Ij ..j ~ ~~.~' .~.. so .r I.' : mo. ~? =.1 '.~" . ~c~~'t: ~~. ~n!I~40134.\.J341i3431~44:54!J~.g-:341~48 ~4~3S6iS!;(\'5Zi5S;J~54:5S5Im ,s'!.lm ~ .. ~. _ ' ~ '" p ... 00;;'0 So.- i . 'il . ~ ; F-< '"1 i;!1:;ll 1:;1 ,;!;l ':;II :;;iI F- ~ I "!I 1 ;;J I ~ ~ .....7400 73/0 /__ ..---1,!MOUTH 71SO AVE. Ifl.ll/O \ 10 4'AiL 1.:';\.:..1 :.~:.l :.~:.l:.~.: J :..':!l~ J.22.. '~.~.i.~ l:'~:' t:...'i:.J...:"'J...:'" L..:5....:... ...311.0." ..;:.... . . (Revised 1/99) . Date Received of-~-11.. S /1/ 01 Petition Number Amount Received S ,0.. .,v ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 2. \~\la \L-.e)\~'j \)\Z- BZA Petition Date A \J 9 \) <; -t ~ ~O~ <r SUe FO\S~r Name , ~ ~ (0 \L, f A \ '\) Dr , Address *7~~-S5q- J ~~ \ Business Phone ~~th J-ao \ 3. Petitioner: . c;o lcky" 'JCj \ \~Y.1 M ~ S5~)l . city/StatelZi~ ~~~-SLJL)- ~72 Home Phone 4. If petitio'ner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: ~J~ 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): L(r~- r; I 'B \ 0 (~ ';).! -.:J \ E \u Ad~~+~oV) 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: ~ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling \>e -krs()n ~ \\ Q \ \ ~" ~ ; +1' ()-f ~J..e 1\ "Ie, 1 \ vi \ Y)~~~;V\ ~Ovf\4."I Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building . permit issued. ( . . ft \ \. \..wQv~c...\ lLeQ-..) ~ 'f~ '0(\'\; c..V\c. E. () f ~"l q ,) ) S j 7\ ") A . \l"\ r-, \ Ii' Joo \ - Jcx.) '2 We> v' I ~ (LeQ",~ V"t.. --vc"",; ~ V\ e..~ of :2. lo '1 J /i f\~tt .\.I~,f,\ of 'X _~ }>o\-eJ, 0'" fY'OI/1-t- ~ ~u .\-0r~ 0t(\d ~ add (hOV10-! ? I "ell jo..hte OG>r't-Z6n cife; rdj (Staff will complete this item) () r 8. Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A c;urrent or usable survey of the property must be atta(flled. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a' regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must . show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shQwn. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey, is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the s4rvey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ ...'95. C0 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. C'-SLl~)C'- fJl. M~~ Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this . means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name Comment ~(),.<;o f\ ~ L.()r\n\~ \~ ff' \LoSS C Signature ~ ~@dress 13 1:S IA.d I 'f \) ~. . Print Name_Rf' i VlO <:.t E\)e.I. ,/" . ~ K I V\ Fil Comment . Si9nmure~ J~ Print Name E Q. ; ~<i- ? t,A -t +- ~ Comment Address \ -:s ~Ll ~ ll-y Dr. \ L4r$o1"'\ Signature Address \ ~ \~ Mary \C\V\cl . A:~e ~" Print Name-BR-cvl-+ ~ \Scoo\L-.e. B.e hlf") Comment Signatur~k~~_. Address /3oc} ~4 .1;n~-( Print Name \ ~e ~J. '/ ~ \2-0 ~e f'1- R. fS' 'f ~ , \..) )V"\, ~ Comment r0r) ct~ I JO:i1 Signature~~ lIkn IJ!/;)~~ress \ ~ -;tS [Vb ('{) QY\cl !\\)e.. ~ Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . Print Name Comment , Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address - . . . SURVE~ FOR: Mr..Joe Forester , DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Block 2, PETERSON"S VALLEY VIEW ADDITION, City of Golden Valley, Hennepin County, Minnesora. Jim !XY'I.O 5 dfuo(!.la.~ fine. PROFES~LLANDSURVEVORS AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS (61~) 4~1-91~6 13821 VINEWOOD LANE CAYTON. MNS5321 o tes Iron Monuments (found & set) NOTE: This property is subject to any and all easements of record. No attempt has been made by us to locate same. NIJt"T ,.J -105'".0 - '<..,;' :' ~.,<t.' ....".."...~ .... ~v" \ @> tf"".--.....,.... / Ir. I , ../ ;'" c:(." '" \/ '\ .j; i l , \..--f (~ J I.;] , I ,~ <:I III ~ :;> "- ~ ) Vl "'j I.lI \'0 ~ ,f) ~I.JI " Q"" )~ 11\ I I "'~" 1 ~;~..... I I I I ~ ~... "V . ~ .sCALE: 1"=<30' ( I ~ ~ 40 ;~(, - 105.0- NOnH COIU.IE-rE Cu I., --'--", /(~LL.Y P~'VF: . - I supervision of the State , Minnesota License No. 12267 \J~'fi ctv\ 0..E \.la. '\ ; "V'\ e. E '(LeQI.,)',(cc1. fo fle.w,",; 'f ('cl +0 ~C'f-\\- s id~ .=,1.19 I We'S-t I'f'roll'\+ -::. ?G.l..{ I As 14 year residents of Golden Valley, we have committed ourselves to staying in . this community and raising our children here. We realized some time ago that our small house would not be sufficient to fulfill the lifestyle we desire. Rather than move to a larger house and start over, we feel we can accomplish our ideals by improving and adding on to our existing home. After 5 years of exploration, we have come up with a plan that we believe fits our needs. As the first phase of our remodeling, we believe an addition to the north side of our home offers the most economical method to achieve the desired added living space. Our ideal is to create a functional dining/great room area upstairs and 3 bedrooms on one floor downstairs. To the east, we have a mature backyard with many beautiful trees as well as a view of the golf course. Our plan allows us to preserve those special attributes. At this time, all utilities have entrance on the northwest corner. Our plan allows us to invest more in the structure by avoiding major utility changes. As the first part of our Petition For Ordinance Waiver, we are requesting permission to build within 13.8' of the property line versus the 15' outlined by city ordinance. The location of our existing chimney on the north side of our property will decrease the amount of usable finished space on the inside of the addition by 2'. Without the variance, that area would be constricted. A full 15' exterior would allow us to . create a reasonable dining room area. We believe the full 1 5' addition offers the most value for our investment both now and in the future. The second phase of our remodeling involves the addition of a front porch which we, and our neighbors, feel will add to the appeal of our neighborhood. In order to be usable, we believe the porch needs to be 8' deep. The entrance/gable portion of the porch would be 10' deep. As the second p,art of our Petition for Ordinance Waiver, we are requesting permission to build within 32.36' of the property line for the porch and within 30.36' for the porch entrance versus the 35' outlined by city ordinance. Joe and Sue Forster 1 31 6 Kelly Drive Golden Valley, MN 55427 August 7, 2001 . "\ - '> l~lJ17Al Remodeling Advantage! FRONT PORCH / ADDITION Joe and Sue Forster 1316 Kelly Dr. Golden Valley, MN 55427 763-544-7372 Designed By: Mike Stewart Date: 7/16/01 Revised: Scale: \14" = l' Stewart Remodeling Advantage! 8014 Olson Memorial Hwy, #140, Golden Valley, MN 55427 763-497.8'82 Office 763-497.~92 Fax Mil Lie. #'204 MemberNARI , " t==I~ t==1,'1 ' k-.... ,- I I ..... -r I i '. '_ t-=.I~___. ~--__... 'tir' 'i:J~~=-....~! "', .."1"--'-'''-'' - .. i ..-' . --, ~ /::< .. , ----==:-~ _llfj ,# .;;, .",' , ../~ . , ;./; 4' " :r ""--. ',. f .. --_._-..- :..- ... i~~. -r . . . . . . . . . www.cigQUm_vll~ Y 8-13-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 1316 Kelly Drive Joe and Sue Forster Joe and Sue Forster, with property located 1316 Kelly Drive, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for two variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to build a front porch and a room addition onto the existing home. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance requested is for 4.64 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 30.36 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Kelly Drive for the proposed porch addition. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 1.2 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.8 feet on the at its closest point.to the north side property line for the proposed room addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28,2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. 7601 Winsdale Street North 01-8-33 David Downs-Reid . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 7601 Winsdale Street North (Map 15) (01-8-33) David Downs-Reid, Applicant Date: August 22, 2001 David Downs-Reid, with property located at 7601 Winsdale Street North, is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a detached garage. This garage requires a variance from building setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. The f~lIowing are the requested variances: · The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet at its closet point to the front property lines along Winsdale Street North and along Quebec Avenue North for the existing home. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the detached garage shall be located at least 35 feet from a lot line which is also a street line. The property owner is requesting a variance for the detached garage for this requirement. The variance requested is for .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet at its closet point to the front property lines along WinsdaleStreet North for the proposed detached garage. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in September of 1961 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 7601 Winsdale Street N David Downs-Reid, Applicant . Clf.- - -.. ~ ~ ~ -;, 7e '~I ~,el~ '\ """''''~ ~;- .'8 is 7. ~1;;.1 ~ ~ 18 : .7.~~ :;~ \', I. I. . '. ~" ..,.1.' . ; 0 ... i "c:i I,.!!>~~e. II ~ 8e:~' a II ~ 8e:~1 . <IN. _ ._.."-; - :::I~-e !!!5..!;!;.17:: 8 ~~.~! 17! e ~:!... '" ' t'!~ 1\- ' ~ .,,\ ,.. ,~ . ::: I .' /JJ.&~ ~ ~ :helo i ge~~.j,,~o-i. ~~i2. -<'LoI)'Il.. - ~'" ';;-. 1".2 ,..... ~. ~..!'l.I1j ~ .." 16 9. 1" ~6 9~'l:1 0 e.. ,.",n oo~n I '.. W ~ 8 ~ I ., bJ . ': 'I .1.1 "'.1' i:i: oJ ''''W'll, ~l - -" - ~ l:l?J:i "::-.,-:""'-- ">'--"- L.> ... ~~~:R~~~ v1~ ,;r:.~~.... ~ - ~ ~. ~. e15' 10. . ~ ' e~~ .~O~ ~. r+:::" , ?ti "'.7Z ~. I 1121. '... Lot I) J;!,.'I "5 : e'. . ::i2e, ~e6 ! 3e~~ ~~e6 3'~ '~':.14;: 1I.~l!:~~eI4 ~ 1I.~:::::!i! .:;.,). C) "'11 "I.n '31'1 '11" - IJU4 ouu' !! I ..... ."...!!! ~;.!! ~~_. ~ c):: ~E-:.;.:. ~ ~~~p~ 'J~~~~J :_,:.. IZ _.;~ i h e'3; IZ .~~ ~ ~ e : t\C orr"'. ,t ~ZA' _: """.... !.1il.lt ~ Tllo' 0 fD '" b"." !i ...._ ~ 1O;Jo ..",a ii"-'I Jco:: '- . ~ '''.'Z 'II.n C' ~,' "'." .11.... C ; :I. 'u... .., c. .:1 If'" ",." r :: M,dI-lH'. ::;! ikM!.850 "'4'U'CZ'~, "t, nl :YUDIA I ~_:. \ f11...ST. iJ 1Z1.., ~ ~ ;~.. ~"5..~.f. ~ 33 .,n'.... n... OQ"'~. /4 .,.10 ... 144.. ~ 4\ ~~. ". 'l; 40.... .I~" ~ lSo4..\. ~ .;~ . ~'Z'tz.~ let; ~e14 ~ Ie ~.~..:.. f:! . I.;:!' ~el4 ~. ..~~ ~.:; ( ...fhi~ 'f e.:i.~ ~ el5 "," .7e ~"'.~ ~ ~ <l '~~ _ t~ ii.:-:ell ~t e~'~ \- ,,,' - .. .. --- ----- <( ~ - ---"'!i!. ll/zSi'" i!i!; IZ~S' 3.. ,ell . ~3---t~~/t ~5-,--; o,~elt '3.~:'-o\)5' 2' II ,4 4., ,,-3'--1'1';:~~~~ >---:t;~,' " .~4~T:~ , ... _,/',L_ :) ll----- 0 ' :) ------"'::!-----"' 084' " IZ~4' 5.. ,'./0. 5.., ~ ~ 1Il ~ ~::,. .10 .5.~~. j;o ~('fiif;.i :Z~1 ~~ i--:-~~a:ll~-J.t --.....tl! . ~ ' 125- ~'~~~:!. ~ I~'.~';; ~ ;~.. ~ Li~-~ i~~~- ~~~~;~.~-~ I~;::~~U' ~ 7""Q WINSDALE :::~ T7()().. .;;~ .: Q'm; '.. "!';,". "If /44p 1f4.'., I~j" 01 ''F.".I 159-' ... _~<{ ~~~J1. ~. _!.....~.ll:. ~~..'4'~ ~....~~p.", ~ ____.'! ~~_~~__,__..!_~~ ~~ li'TJ.~<' 1 ,\''-.~__.~!~~;, e13' Z. t;~=r:::-~~~~.~ffi ~~.I.~:' 3. \a-i1Ii.INI~~il'~lll~ A.3.,lhll I 3e:,~~ . _J11__,.. 0.._ c ~~_'1rt.~~__~._;~' '~e'~I~~_." . r-j, "1I~~I"\4.., ~~~___~_J~__~~l~ !"~~~i<~ 't. I l.!l .J! IA ~~;;; ... ,.". ~~L!--c~-;3~ 10., ___5__.: l' elo" .'1;' I!:'"-J-: :---'7'~~~~~ ~._~ , ~ '.t" " ,.~l,.,. '."bp.~. 1;~:ol-~: ll~!ji! ~-- < -..--- ---....-' ., ........- -. --.;., . - Z.' :tl~.l~l ~ "",?".~ ~ '4~," ~ 1... .:i J -.2 -:4t ~ 141.0.e. ~~ ~T~ i T.r.:i u . TS~ . ~~.. .. - KNOLL ST 75H 75/4... .. . ,180 'q'" 782/ T8/~ ms 7705]fiST 7629 7613" ~ r<<", -';"..v ""'" :... -~... 2 1'" '" ,. 10 '4 ~' ' , . . "I~".S "'. .... '-4 '.". ..' O:;c .; ~.. · .. 7.r" 772/ . . . . ~ .'1 . . .....'. .. .. l ~ 0". .. ~~~~3 Z. I~~ ::IO~' ~ 1 , 54! It: I~ R~S 4 3 2+J- z2~cnC\ , . . ., :~ ! I > ' e ":.l ~ ;....<t~~~ .Jll.;'..1 :.... i-1L 1,4 I" .. , . 1_. .,t ..!., 1 ,4-' ,... I ^.. I,. Ui ~ ~ ': e ., r 11\01 : : I I"". ~ 204, r; ~~ e.,. I. w ~l6.tl \ . ~ ~5-t: .1 8 ~l5q~u 12 13 14 15 " 111 I II" : ZO;:~!l:l'l .1 , I~ ~ ~ '\~ . ! '--' . ". ~t:!!(- 1T~8 7!,I77t · I. .! . I- t:~f!F::.;& - . liI~ ~,: ff>~: '. ~3133 ,~,z '0 ,. 10 40 '4 " ' ~.!nl_!../ 1'4 40 ,,, . . . 17'.:,1:=.;f9 \_~ 71120'76/2 .... PLYMOUTH77Of7U2 1624 T6/2AVE';W75/2 ~ !:.ail ~"~.al "'>.1..13Jf"."no;.. . 'Nzu i ' ~'.IZ Q:' - . . (Revised 1/99) . Date Received ol-T>--311? ~/~! oJ Petition Number Amount Received Jj 50, cO ($50 residential - $150 other) ~ . ,- ". ".. ~ PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WA'IVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1, Street address of property involved in this petition: . 7tOI_lA/il\sJgle ~~t North 2. BZA Petition Date AIA~ 1 ~,) ). 00 \ 3. . Petitioner: Da.\J~ J Downf\.o f(e,o\ Name 7601 Wih\~lej ~t. GD\ob VaHe"MtJ 5~ill. Address City/Slate/Zip 7b '5- SD '"t.:.!:I::t 0 2. 763 - S-'tb" ~CfOq Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): ~\ ~V\d 2 J Block 1) ~rlnnetkq ~er\r'\ep,C\: County J M N 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: .L Single Family ..:.- Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. New :22~.21 cktlAC.heJ ~e w~th &" w"lIs .)1')(7 overkeaL ~OO( With (),et\cr : vinyl s~it\~ J a.\L\~&\M sof11 ~ fG\sc.i~ p' eJe(itM~ .f )tD-<l'6h;~ & 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). .Subd(s). Subg(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this wa,iver. Attach letter;. photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attachec,J. Proposed . surveys are not acceptable. The survey must,be prepared by a regis- tered la'nd surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the surVey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: < ' To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this apQlication are true and correct. Attache9 herewith is my check in the amount of $ SO, ' representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. /1;J j ~~~ Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION ORTHE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. .If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver cQ~ld have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that yc;>u have been,told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. . (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) ;, . /Yl;~ JJ::; X (l f/L/ /?i~E 1(1) (Jrl)}l~ ,AAA71 ~/M Print Name Comment Signature~~~ Address fS-O / C(~JeL- ~-A! Print Name Sh-ri'(}MJ Ho;x~~c;S. . Comment Signatu~~.. . Print Name ~ IJS'.IJ:iI Comment Address J "-tift; ~c:-( / fh./e, 1\1 Signature ~.t .~~ Print Name '-ifJdq Svenss- OYJ Comment Address Its;2 4)ltehfr JfVt"ll . -.... Signature ~_h~ Address Io/'Ir ?A~d~ .41 J/w./;t./ Print Name_~e(rl An..c1e(5D(I Comment Signature ~l.(Z;j-hv --tJ/1. Address I'I!J f IGhocle. .ts. ziv<. JJ Print Name W{) II ~ e- f1 at'.I1.. Jlayes Comment Signature 44~, ~;,.mfress 14351t{,(Ix{./_I/-~.17. Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment . Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address . Print Name Comment Signature Address . . . . Ordinance Waiver Petition -7601 Winsdale Street We have contracted Ray Erickson Construction Co. to build a detached two-car garage. According to the contractor, the City of Golden Valley requires that the garage be built even with the back of our existing house and garage. If it were built at that spot, we would need to destroy a large tree (30" maple, as shown on the survey). We are asking that we be allowed to build the garage 8' closer to Winsdale St. This would leave the garage the same distance from Winsdale as our existing house and garage. By moving the garage forward, we would be able to save the maple tree. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. (;)(Tl }>x :;0 Vi }>-l (;) (Tl . -,------1 I 1 I I I I '" I I '" en I I I I cf;', (;)(Tl }>x :;0 Vi }>-l (;) (Tl 32.8 55.5 O~, - - - - - - - - i-x------....-....'"i- T ............ r ~~ ~~ Len <::::lo) +0 <:::l r:!i ~~ "'~CD T::; Ati1 P'~ i~ 'ib -,.. L" (i) L!;! I 0 I r'" r :r:(Tl I ox fj5Vi + (Tl-l r 5.7 r 0 o '"b, -l N . ~ I I '" I I I I \ \ <)"0 1. " , o '" o ^ I I I I (TJ ,==II:::"""TJX -..J::OV) I ~:c-l I --" ~ --" I (f) (f) . (TJ-l I I I Q-1?> -1~ -0.:- - 'b_~ 'b\ c>>11~..,'i o '3....~i 15 12.0 I I I I '"bP I I '" ... 0. CONC CURB - -120.00- - - QUEBEC :r::E" (Tl-0(Tl ZZ-l(;) - - - - ~~~~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --' Z^)>CJ }>Z(Tl () CJUl o () c N2!1 Z . -0 -l ro-l -< .6 . Oz s:: ().. ?!'- ^ .:-J . PROJECT NO'R200169 BOOK OATE JULY 22, 2001 PAGE REViSiONS A VENUE CERTIFICA TE OF SURVEY ERICSON CONSTRUCTION ~ L I ~'\ ~ i~ I' - -x - J.(?< - - 0 \ ... 34.5 )> ~ i5'J' O~ j\ \ OCD 7t-, ~ -o~ ~ ,.. ~ I CT>I ~I I 34.5 -------- "'S,oft"'lr DIi'/I-'~ -0. .;, r o ----I P'~ ~~ O~ O. N (f) o )> r ('Tl o o o 2 o > -0 '" o .2 o o 2 o o ~ CD / C"Tl ZO o 1'1~ ^', '" ~ : -1'0 ^' 1'1 1'1 Of:i~ ----;"C -0 I I I I ...... ~ ~ <::::l 9 ~ ~ ~ r- fIj z N o , I-c: I -l'>- o V) ~ ~ --; I I I 10., 1<'<, "'c J)1- 'Y z 1\ Land Frank R. Cardarelle Surveyor 6440 FL YING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, ." ('Tl ('Tl ~ ()) o . . . . . . ..oIIl . . iii.. ='Ci.~Mm_vll~ Y 8-13-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 7601 Winsdale Street North David Downs - Reid David Downs-Reid, with property located at 7601 Winsdale Street North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for three variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a new detached garage. The c~nstruction of this garage requires variances from the City Code requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, it was discovered that the existing home does not meet front and side yard setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet at its closet point to the front property lines along Winsdale Street North and along Quebec Avenue North for the existing home. · Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the detached garage shall be located at least 35 feet from a lot line which is also a street line. The property owner is requesting a variance for the detached garage for this requirement. The variance requested is for .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet at its closet point to the front property lines along Winsdale Street North for the proposed detached garage. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. .... 18.15 Hillsboro Avenue North 01-8-34 Thomas and Jane Toleno . . . Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Bey To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 1815 Hillsboro Avenue North (Map 20) (01-8-34) Thomas and Jane Toleno, Applicants Date: August 22, 2001 Thomas and Jane Toleno, with property located at 1815 Hillsboro Avenue North, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a deck addition onto the existing home. This deck requires variances from building setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home, freestanding deck, and shed do not meet setback requirements. The following are the variances requested: . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Hillsboro Avenue North for the existing home and for 12.3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 22.7 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Hillsboro Avenue North for the proposed deck. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variances are for 6.8 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 8.2 feet at its closest point to the north side property line for the existing home and for the proposed deck. . The third requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12. (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the freestanding deck and shed shall be located at least 35 feet from a lot line which is also a street line and be at least 10 feet from each other. The variances requested are for 15 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the freestanding deck and for 3 feet off the required 35 feet for the shed at their closet point to the front property lines along Wheeler Boulevard. The freestanding deck and shed are 3 feet from each other instead of the required 10 feet. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in November of 1968 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 1815 Hillsboro Ave N Thomas and.... Jane Toleno, Applicants ...,'--..- - - --. -. - . 5D 01 II J.7( ~~19( ; ~ ~: '~ "'r JJ ",' .. -- '" ... '" \- , - \ , ~ 12 , . 4 - _IY.~__- 5 __.111:.'_ __ 6 t.! . \It ~ . ~ 1S3.1 ~ "" IJ~.:';. ~ \- 2. I:l f1Z." '- 1!! ~ 3.. .. Il. ~ ... " . . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0 I - S - ~ Date Received ! /6 I DI Amount Received ' Yo. d:J ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: /8/<5' II//i> .borcy Jlf./ 2. BZA Petition Date f)Vj ~t',';U;{) I 3. . Petitioner: 91 'ThDP7I}.5 J..:f'n ne Name . /; '15' 1/; / Is he ftJ Address Ul. rP1{Jt8'/J Business Phone 1/ {;;/enu . 4, C-c/Jen ~ ~. City/Statel ip 7t3 511-/~9 Home Phone ss'l~J 4. I~ petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioners interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): te.; :3 +1 . JJ.k.l ,:, LIlKeLliew IjC:ii~tt5. IIcnneolr. C:;~ flJn- I . / .:::J I r 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: 0Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial ~ Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. I . ro n-f 0..( h 1)\J set (See 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Pleasecrttach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- . tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey m~st show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate lo~ation of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. It the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ .~O.{)O representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. .,A~~(/~ Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . c NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board otZoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to' comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the projector other statements regarding the project) Print Name . /1ndretN/J'. (~e~e-r +-. V..ck;c Ge;e..-- Comment r fhl,.\ (<, +Ge... dRCI< Lv ;'D i)f. 0- 9re~ -r c{cfd,,'hov,- -f,-.;.\ -/-L.JL- no !/"t1f! CiA'\~~ fA-r) I { NJ.f--- 6 c a. l-~ e '1 e J <-i!r-Z." Signature O;V'-1ftv- {} ~.,t..Js - Address J~ () () Tt1ctfJPft1 rtfHc e Avt .;J I t Print Name_lAk-trel I3llk'nUU'~- ~ J I i / P )UhM~/' . Comment We- I.l/pj~~ ~ ~~ ~ J~ ~ ~ u/e-- k~/yt! ~#~ /~1'~ /-<.1 , , ~~a$~ eA A t. J 7f dl ~ ~ ~ 4U..J lvl' -;r.L,ih Signature~~~K..VJ Address 1~r7 f-/;t/sfdrvo Ave. Print Name ,)e,{l~ 2) lo~llLhd . ., Comment trv .rI ill j( - I VlJ/l R.d (hILt Cj-:Yf OJ 1- vf1 ApiA /1tJYL tpfu ofw 0(./tLbtH YrJ!f)tL'l Signature ~),kAD~\ Address -9 3Ll S-' 8CU l 8: +- , C5D \C\w V l'A,l \ t\j I mn 5f:14:n Print Name Comment Signature Address . . :/1 \ I ~ ~ i ,'s , I ~ IliI I 1"""'1 111 I r...., '\Il(}/ ~ .I;)c;),~ ~ \)~ "1) ~ I ~ ~ II~ I " ,~ DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lone No. Plymouth. MN 55447 Phane:(763) 559-0908 Fox :(763) 559-0479 . /8ITvMlNQV~ N ~!i- 2e. >O~......- !-VIZI'J/(:e; ./ /35.8$ M.M. l~b./)8 P(~!__. .. ~4-.b -- ----~l . 2 J ~o6rl IA~ I Adjacent House , I I '" ..' 1 ~ .. to., :}D.I ~ ::! Io.t> .... '" '" HOUSE '" vi 'I 2.4-.Z ( \ \ '7(1, t;o MEAl. t,b.7 ptAr . ~ ~1J'2f G9"e 1 / I hereby certify that this survey. plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of the Stote of Minnesofa. File No. 114058 Book-Page File Scaie 1"=20' 1~.0 David E:. Crook Dote:~ Minn. Reo. No. ~ ~~. ~\> ~~ ~~% 27.7 .. ... .. ~2.7 ~ ~~ K. . <:I ~~ \1\" ~ ~ 3 Z~:I s-~ / . ~o I 0 ~ ~I / f;J · V ~~ ~ ~ So ~~ / / / / ~ / / / / o - Denotes iron monument Property Description Lot 3 and 4, Block 6, LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS, Hennepin County, Mn. CERTlFICA TE OF SURVEY FOR: S Thomas & Jane L Toleno 1815 Hillsboro Avenue North Golden Valley, Mn 55427 . . . . . . . . . . Ul ~~ i=ti ~t- l5ifi ) . n( ~ 'J/. IIVI G-,Il I ~=~ ~ : :~- =========JIIIII ~Il~ . ~lUt d)1Ud) ========= III ~?~ ~ ---~-----~II ~~5o --------- I t1~~ -~=~~~=~=~ ~'Il?~ ~ ':":10.91 .~.,........ ~ = ~ r HI"'''' : : : : ::l - III :_: . :_:_:jl~ ~ = ~,Q>1xt ,.;' ~ 1= ~ ~II ar==t-1I1 ~ \r= - I ~ "VI Z:-,9 "L-,'C: z II VI G-,Il tn . co r I z '<[ ~ ~ z () - Q I- '<[ I . Z ~ ::J ill -J () -c{ 0 JL cD If\ .. co Toleno Reeldenc:e - Dsc:k. 18& I-IIlIllbGro Ava K. CiQ.DEN VALLEY. M/NEIQTA NG1 Dats: tD611212e01 1 ~( <t1D ~~ i=~ ~1- XZ UJUJ ) IICZ'-' C=l I; H II i, I I II U t1 II Ii , I I~ r1 II II II II ~ I Q I C Z . ~ '- ~ 8 .UJ o II <t o ~ ~ ~ Il'\ -1 ~ II <t"" on.: ~~ . '- 11ld) '<t-1 ~i Z <{ . If I Till] i I II I I I i I I I I I I I I I II I ! I ~-L-L~--L.--L_--L.-_~ '....I--- gO'7'3C!U "II . ~1'7'.ig e IIY-,L lICZ'-,V 0_ ZQ <{~ . ~~ Ow w...t ~ ~ . IICZ'-,~l Toteno ~&'dence - Dec:Ic. I&S I4JIIMx:Iro AYlL No GOLDEN VALLE'T'.I'1IN'E6OTA 5&G1 Dals: 06/t2I2tDtDl 2 . r I ! I~ I I l~ 11- I i~ I. I I i . I It JI ll-,- _I . z o t- o<{ >= Q I Toteno Reeldence - Deck _J.lfI~Av&M. GOI.J:)EN VALLEY.I'1INE8QTA Me, Date: tD&12212~1 3 r ,}:=- If ::l . z o t- '<1 > lU~ . . Tolsno ~eldenc::e - Deck. 18& ..rt1ebGro Ava N. CiQLE;)EN VALLEY. MItfE80TA ~ Dat.s: tDS122120tD1 4 . . tr;----3' . ,I IL_~.______!i It==--====- It== . z () t-- <[ > & I . t--= ~ I-: ~W _<J. o cD Toleno Realdence - Deck. IeI& J.IllIebGro Av-. N. GOI...PEN VAI..I.ET. MNE80TA MoG1 Dat.s: lZ612212fDlZ)t 5 www.n.gOMro~lt~ Y . 8-13-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 1815 Hillsboro Avenue North Thomas and Jane Toleno Thomas and Jane Toleno, with property located at 1815 Hillsboro Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for several variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to build a deck onto the front of the existing home. The construction of this deck requires variances from the City Code. Also, during the construction planning process, it was discovered that the existing home, freestanding deck, and shed do not meet setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Hillsboro Avenue North for the existing home and for 12.3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 22.7 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Hillsboro Avenue North for . the proposed deck. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variances are for 6.8 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 8.2 feet at its closest point to the north side property line for the existing home and for the proposed deck. · Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the freestanding deck and shed shall be located at least 35 feet from a lot line which is also a street line and be at least 10 feet from each other. The variances requested are for 15 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the freestanding deck and for 3 feet off the required 35 feet for the shed at their closet point to the front property lines along Wheeler Boulevard. The freestanding deck and shed are 3 feet from each other instead of the required 10 feet. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. . Adjacent properties require notification. 6837 Winsdale Street North 01-8..3 S Natban and res$iLilly . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner From: Subject: 6837 Winsdale Street North (Map 15) (01-8-35) Nathan and Tess Lilly, Applicants Date: August 22, 2001 Nathan and Tess Lilly, with property located at 6837 Winsdale Street North, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a deck addition onto the existing home. This deck meets all building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home and detached garage do not meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicants to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless form is attached. The Lilly's will soon begin construction of the ~eck. The following are the variances requested: · The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 7.9 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 7.1 feet on the at its closest point to the west side property line for the existing home. · The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the detached garage shall be located completely to the rear of the existing home. The property owner is requesting a variance for the detached garage for this requirement. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in May of 1948 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 6837 Winsdale Street N Nathan and Tess Lilly, Applicants . .. .... S I ~ I' ~ I~' I Q I Q I ~ I ~I I 34W 34fl54l' ~4~ 3~ 34': 341J348 :;lI I o:!l I r-tl 1;;iI ",",. I ~I I.;;' I . ..., . :.-.!..:. .l:"'"'1..:'.J.. :.~.: 1 :'-.L~ So . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number D I.... i - 3 J Date Received g' / , I >:J.f Amount Received !;-I.). otJ ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: (, &37 W'l1sJ'Lfe .sf. fJ, BZA Petition Date 8/1 r/o , Petitioner: NqR~1'\ .J. lesS L.'/{, Name _foR'1 W'l\s.J~A/ Address (7'~) Sl.S-. Ii.?)"( Business Phone 2. 3. 'olJell VClII~ /l1N .cSYl.) City/StatelZip (7~')) S'ttr, O'~) Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property invoJved in this petition (found on survey): Lo+~ I ~ ~ ~I1J 1~-1, 8ELNtOlv, . 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: X. Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other, 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any . variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. Oed\" ref/~(e f"1cr/"~ be ~vee,'\ e.lC:;si-,'." hc;.;'S( a.,,,J "ja/"., (. 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings, and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in Question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ ~ 0 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~X$- Signature of Applican UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name M'I ) ~rje J La. r-.s: 0-\1 Comment ~ It A -J~ ~- Lf .JA-AL/ , ;- Signature ~~J1' ~_ Address ~J>~J: )r~./!i Print Name -C 7" e ~ ~ N cr/d Comment A/n F ')' I? h J W!--n1 \9A tL. I!) -/ 11t~ . . . I Signature Address 6 g"~4 ti:t (/ II 'Sf- II Print Name-41lhe.l G/ ~ Comment tto j A../~ . Signature n~~~ Address G rf' fLdJ U//Jv s'./l4-k:- S-r: . Print Name 1\ It- i f) L r rt1 4- tV ;t/ Comment /}J/lS. / ~ j2A~ ~~___~ Signature ~ ~~~~'- ~/ .~ Address bP7 y ~~. -5'7; . . . Print Name L11l1nfl c; Ch I Ids Comment Signaturec#e'~47-' . "7". ef~d0 Address ;; g :2~' L~) hzoel~ S-r: Print Name Il. f f'ry~ lJ'lgf/l/ ~ Comment 0D f<,o\:'\-Crl Signature ''-f>~ ~.~~Address .?,fV(' !t)lIA/~~ dnt .fIR Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name .. Comment Signature Address . . . .ERTIFICA TE OF SURVEY For: NA THAN & TESS L1LL Y CERTIFICA TE OF SURV. For: NA THAN & TESS LILL Y Winsdale Street (Subgrode only. no curb). 100.00 Plot 589'44' 45.E 99.80 Meos. DESCRIPTION: Lots 158 and 159, BELMONT, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, -, " '. ~;:. \ 100.00 Plot Ii '~.! .ad I 5j.6 /jj NOTES TO SURVEY: Orientation of this bearing system is based on the north line at an assumed bearing of S 89044'45" EofLots 158 and 159, BELMONT. o.~~_ OlD ::IlL '~"'N 1////.f7~7Y',"'/~1. "": ~ '19.8 . 0.,.,,., ~;! ,. :,; 10 .... ~ This survey has been prepared without benefit of a title commitment policy or tItle opinion, therefore only easements from the record plat have been shown as a part of thIs survey. o Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe monument set. . Denotes 1/2 Inch iron pIpe monument found and verified. . Denotes 1 Inch iron pipe monument found and verified. CERTIFICA nON: .6 Chain Unk Fence - 1-1 /- 1. .0 100.10 Meas. 100.00 Plot -e We hereby certify that this is a true and correct survey of the above described property and that it was performed by me or under my direct supervisIon and that I am a duly licensed Land' Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. That this survey does not purport to show all improvements, easements, or encroachments to the property, except as shown hereon. 69.05 Meal. 69~ .9 , ......,;", N89'20'Ol.W 99.55 Meas. 100.00 Plot PROJECT NO.: 1059.10-102 CAD FILE: BASE.dwg i 'eyor, License No. 12282 ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 8401 73RO A VENUE NORTH, SUfTE 63, BROOKL YN ,PARK, MN PHONE: 763-533-7595 FAX: 763-533-1931 Scale: 1 inch = 30 feet . ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 8401 73RD A VENUE NORTH, SUITE 63, BROOKL YN PARK, MN PHONE: 763-533-7595 FAX: 763.533-1937 REVISIONS: DRAWN BY: !5!t!L- PROJECT NO: ~ CAD FILE: BASE.dwg Merila - Oliver & Associates Bearings a/'8 based on an assumed datum. Merila - Oliver & Associates PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES Nathan and Tess Lilly 6837 Winsdale St. N. Golden Valley, MN 55427 . August 6, 2001 City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 To Whom It May Concem: This letter is to serve as a declaration regarding a request for waiver of a city ordinance. The ordinance in question requires a side setback of 15 feet for our home. The distance of our home to the side property line is 7.1 feet at its closest. We desire this waiver so that we may obtain a permit for the replacement of our deck. The prior deck, which existed when the home was purchased, was in a state of severe disrepair and had to be removed. The new deck, if built, will be an integral part of the property. It will offer a walkway between the differing elevations of the side door of the home, the garage, the front walk and the backyard. In addition to providing leisure, it will also enhance the appearance of the home. Thank you for your time and attention in this matter. Sincerely, ~fi7 Nathan Lilly . . . (j~3) IIJI~sJ~/( sf -1L- Street Address "HOLD HARMLESS' I.~ fhan Llt~ ' am reJuesting the City of Golden Valley to allow me to proc ed with a(n) ( ed( onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. . ;U,Jho~ L f'/I, Print Name ~~ S~n~~e j rA/o1 Date ~cvno ~ City 0 Golden Valley Staff Signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~CLgoUm_J1~ Y . 8-10-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 6837 Winsdale Street North Nathan and Tess Lilly Nathan and Tess Lilly, with property located at 6837 Winsdale Street North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for two variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to replace a deck on the side of the existing home. During the construction planning process, it was discovered that the existing home does not meet side yard setback requirements and that the existing detached garage does not meet accessory structure requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 7.9 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 7.1 feet on the at its closest point to the west side property line for the existing home. · Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. ~ity Code states that the detached garage shall be located completely to the rear of the existing home. The property owner is requesting a variance for the detached garage for this requirement. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. . Adjacent properties require notification. 1.401 .Ju.oie Avenue .SOlltll 01-8-36 Thomas and Barbara Deans . . . Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner From: Subject: 1401 June Avenue South (Map 10) (01-8-36) Thomas and Barbara Deans, Applicants Date: August 22, 2001 Thomas and Barbara Deans, with property located at. 1401 June Avenue South, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11,21). The applicants had approached the City to build a new attached garage. This garage requires a variance from building setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. The following are the requested variances: · The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater. than 70 feet and less than 100 feet, the side setback shall be 15% of lot width. The requested variances are for 3.17 feet off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 9.58 feet on the at its closest point to the north side property line for the proposed new garage and for 2.1 feet off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 10.8 feet on the at its closest point to the south side property line for the existing home. The City's file on this property does not contain the original building permit for the home, but Hennepin County's property record system states that the home was constructed in 1941. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 1401 June Avenue South Thomas and Barbara Deans, Applicants 304 DOUGLA Cast .57.. . . ~tween :>t. LoUIS Par f Golden Valley ~ ~ O. ~ I I I ;y (55 Z!J) r.lewish Comm. Cenfer, SI. Louis Park i j A _""",'0 .-:-- --- . . . Industrial . Other . . (Revised 1/99) DI-8...~6 8/,101 Petition Number Date Received Amount Received S-o . 00 . ($50 residential- $15(}other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: JL..fC) 1 -:J C) V\E ~u.q, ~ ~[ckV\ LJQ l ~ I W1 ~ 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: ~W\^"" _C:; ~ ~",.rn vn... '"';S ~'" S Name t"-t::), ~~\I\-E' ~ ~ Address G::, S" \ :!;;}(;) S (j ~ r t- Business Phone . C-o~V\ CQ(~I WiAJ ~I G:, City/Statel Ip . . J <03 ~'")? "fQ;)feB'" Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): J ~.-r / 1 15,,~Cf(c.{. 'l'rRdl HI! ~.s I JfEvAJefJ/iJ {};OJJ7Y I tlU1J1E$CTA I 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: 'A Single Family ~ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. ""~~...\~,'W\,'\ a.\N\. Q."1l..~""~~'" ~ ~Q.~ +- c\..~~. '- 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. . . 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey l11ust be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings..and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the ~ide(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. . 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ OfP,190 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~~~ ~j,~V Signature of APGHcant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name ~a '(" b a yo 4. 1] i e c1 ~; c.. ~ Comment Signature*~/i2/J~~ Address f-3/5 hF ~ Print NamC~ -re::.l . . Comment ~ . ~_~ Signatur~ _(1d1~:f Address /323 C) --rJ (j>>e~. Print Name~~ ~rJlff?-- Comment Signature Address t-; -=to ALPtftff 1A$5 Print Name Afaf}~Io~ Comment Signature Address . e ...~,.,M....'e_Lf~~~k~ ..A .~l?t.~~~~~tQ.e.~~..~.'.~..~...u_- ,. -7 . / ~ .Uh......t~d!~"7~~~...?'~~, ....~~...~.........m~uuu__.__u_..uu_. :~. .. '~ ~~ .~ AH.., '''T- .. ....~.~ .~.nu ..u.... . .....n .~~ .... ...~~ __uUu..__u_,,___ ......-l~~bA~ftbh~~~~~~ . ' ~ L _1_ . ~. . - + b!.. - .TM-~~~~#~-.dE-"iHJ?-dU(.I&~~~.QIU../~"... ..... . -J'f1R~A1J~~d.~/L:~~~~~j/ff'..~7Kf .u.._..._...."~~~~~~._ ~- . .~ ~. ~~ e eq t;l'.':> -.~..: - ..=; '9 Cerf/r/cole Of Su/'vC>Y tor: 7homa.s Deans lAND SURVEYORS I1'JC:. ~t.;'-P:f y '''''1 i { ~ J....tLj . I',. .:.' ~.... .' ~I_J Scale: j/~30' Oe/7ole.s Iro/7 N I , ").. I " 1.......- .. .... ~ ( '. . 'J) 3- V) i I I ~ i I ~ ~ ') i0 ~ ~ ~ ! ! ~ " ,"- "$70-. ~ . '\..- -- /.;,.~~? \../0-:> - ~ -~ " \ 1 " "'"T' . . ...... t:h . (:: ~ ..;: \It ."" ~ ~~ ~':"'. :'~~:~ ~l '. ". . .,,,,j~1o . ...~ l,~'l" ",- --.".1" .. ..:-....)'1 " , ;:~J "... Ii' ~ ~ 2~; . .. r.. " I \5 ~. ~ ,j ~ ,) " '<. '" r-.: '. o:'h ~ /5'.-3 ~ '" ') "'.' !" --/500:..J - --"'" ?:~G,qL Oc~~If~~TION.. !. 0 I II: b/~~clr c1 He/}/7ep/~'/ COUI7/~;,,~ TYROL H/!..i5 ) M/;r;/lcsola. ~d l~crll.'~Y Ct~rtl:l t:~d.~ ~.::~S ~s .) ':.:::';~.l.",:'l C.-,:";':'~':. :Ci!tCSu:-.':..l~:":..n :>! ~ s_:-".'e":" t~tJ ~G\':a~.l:":'C:J ':)! t:-;e loll;.! dl!:J~r~~-..:~~ ,,:.,.......! it:'".! -:! ..~lll loca:.:.")n o! A~~ 't:.::.:.~:':'" t~f.:t'CC:1. a~.J a~l '1~51b:"! ~nr:roa'.:~.:nuntq. ~! an: !rctn ..:>r on "tdt.! :.1.r~..!. ~;"';.3: ::-: 8..:r....U'/ ~;.s!t. rt',,:pl'1t"cd tr,o !!'II) Ot :.111 ~(:t" ,,-,. -lite!"' ~ .i_.~:."13:.cn ar.d t~..at 1 IS"": a ~'* Rcql..stercd L.3r.d SU:-':':YL'l un~cr t::\; 1.'.....5 'If :':,.' :;..a:e u! !"!.lI'U~CSC:lS..:\S s....:-...ei bi' "'Q thl,' ff..ddiltc of A(./1f(.'~-":"_------ ")?.;:.::'u' ~ ,/ )) - '\.fr1.a...<Cr_G I.----=-~~__ '''""u...,ta ""'Il.trfttlor> No. /7?OS Jc:: Nc 76'0/10/ 43 30 P:Jgf' 40 Boe.,. See T e9 R cC: 0,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~mdgoUm_v11~ Y . 8-13-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 1401 June Avenue South Thomas and Barbara Deans Thomas and Barbara Deans, with property located at 1401 June Avenue South, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for two variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to construct a new garage onto the side of the existing home. This addition requires a variance from side yard setback requirements. During the construction planning process, it was also discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. This construction project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. . · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 70 feet and less than 100 feet, the side setback shall be 15% of lot width. The requested variances are for 3.17 feet off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 9.58 feet on the at its closest point to the north side property line for the proposed new garage and for 2.1 feet off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 10.8 feet on the at its closest point to the south side property line for the existing home. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . 1117 Pennsylvania Avenue North 01-8.37 .J~. and Kathy Man,,,ll . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner From: Subject: 1117 Pennsylvania Avenue North (Map 16) (01-8-37) Jim and Kathy Mancell, Applicants Date: August 22, 2001 Jim and Kathy Mancell, with property located at 1117 Pennsylvania Avenue North, are requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21); The applicants had approached the City to build a new attached garage. This garage requires a variance from the following building setback requirements: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 70 feet and less than 100 feet, the side setback shall be 15% of lot width. The requested variance is for 8.05 feet off the required 13.05 feet to a distance of 5 feet on the at its closest point to the north side property line for the proposed garage addition. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in June of 1941 for the construction of the home. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 1117 Penn Avenue N Jim and Kathy Mancell, Applicants .---- l' Zl. 05 ~es. .....- 4 8 ... on (D c. 3823 "11'~) .. 16 . 15 t" iii .....-- ~ 14 .... . .~II. _.10 144 I~ 9 ~t!1J';1 - . . ::::;;; . . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 0 , - i . - 3 '-1 Date Received 1/ J ,,/ 0 I , . Amount Received $fso, 00 ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: I \\ 1 ?E'N V'\$l Y U A 'N.i \0- 2. BZA Petition Date l\\J~ (\\ 3. . Petitioner: ....J\IiV\ '\- kA-\\-\v VV\\A\f\.\C.\;..LL. Name :') _ I \\\l -\:'\iN"'\SU'(VAV'\U~ V\Vf.1 r\i &cLCHtV'i VALLey M~ 55"(/27 Address City/State/Zip I 6\L ,~\ l/o~ 763 -5L(2- 934 c., Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): . kit( 0;: L6\ {5 f\.I....L OF L.~l- (, '1l...0(.", 15 uj,*"t'\'~\ \('A 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: t,/"Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any . variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship Which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed . surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepare~ by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also, the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ ~-().OO representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver.could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name Comment J~a ,I'" ~ Signature /;;<0;;- ~'-sr.e7lU< ' -- -.J I) .( J \--! i ! ~/I" 011 f Print Name . Comment . Signature-=, ~--r7/;f Yl~/ Address c::::;:-/ v /' ;// Print Name h J. f\ 6-) E ;;::_SO /V' . "-,-' I'] j Ll II A r.; \ .! k' 0"; t . ,J( IV~ Comment Signature ) . . A In" .oti . ) I J2--Ix~~t'1-r1- Address // [/ / r'/I )IV 'it Print Name Comment ui/v il tJ t. if --z: 0 . Lt-J'Z7' HC'i-- D CJ /- IlZfl'O ",-, c...::5 "71 tl-'llL:.5 Signature Address i I f f., CSJ '-'\ Ii-bil(._ I~ j\.if{ N -<\0)' t./ '~9; , J. I /. '-" u Y7 To Whom It May Concern . We are interested in building a two-stall garage on to our 1940's home. We are looking to do this to allow both cars to be parked inside the garage. As it stands now, we store one car and our riding lawn mower outside. We chose to add the garage onto the North side of our existing garage, as it would allow a side-by-side presentation from the street. In our plans, we have allotted for a 23-foot wide garage. Additionally, we are looking to expand our breezeway from 10x13 breezeway to 13X13. Our goal in doing this is to make this room more useable as the only dining area in our home. Currently it does not hold a table for 6 and a china hutch without having the chairs butt up against the hutch. We chose to build those three feet toward the garage instead of back to preserve the balance of the back yard and to save money in new footings and foundation. In actuality, we would have doubled the cost of our project had we expanded the room to the back. The main focus of this project is to create a more convenient home that is comparable to the new homes built today, yet maintain the charm of a post war home from the outside. In addition, we hope to increase the property value of our lot as well as the homes in our neighborhood. . ?~ James Jr. and Kathy Mancell 1117 Pennsylvania Ave N Golden Valley, MN 55427 . 1"-- 1~/3.s- ' / / ----~J II , I ~I I - -_ \1 I ~ <o:j( ~Oy J. HANSEN Land Surveyor AND Civil Eneineer . OF PROPERTY OF 1117 PLAT OF SURVEY Er H ng R.. Moe LOCATION Pennsylv,'lnia Ave., Golden Valley, Minnesota The SQuth 4 feet of Lot .5, all of Lot. 6, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS Block 1 riinnetka r I I~ I~ II ---- / /'i ri U /9' 3. !T 5:'tr \ \ I ! f . ;'rl' . 1:-- - I \ f '\ - . ---~ '"""- - ~ ~': \; Y' Of. V,R/vewAy . ~ ~ - -- ." '\- i, '~,,'1' l)~,J ".t \~ :1 '(- '--:r-- --- . '~l 2 +! 3__....J ~ '", 0- " - ~, /~ .\ I ~ "- \)... ./ \ ~ \ \ ,1 t--- "( I I 'i.t I / / I~ rr I. Ii \ ~/ u -------- / ~I I ---l Scale:' / //7.d;"'" .y'/J /ed'7'" o PC""-'f"ore..!' /r,:7,;;' ,??='y>h::'r . CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that on---' 3. ~.. . ..19./ .~.. I surveyed the property described above and that the. above plat is a correct representation of said survey. . . I hereby certify that on__.___._-,-~___.__~--,19_ I made a ~urvey of the location of the buiI4ing(s) on the abov~ described property and .that the localion. of saidbuilding(s). is correctly ~hown on the above plat. ROY':', HANSEN, REGISTERED SURVEYOR '14;;'~ ~,; NO. 6274 - . . . J, -....'c..- . . . . . . . . , , 3068 ~ RemovelReplace front stoop . Power Jim & Kathy Mancell 1117 Pennsilvania Ave N Golden Valle~. MN 55427 763-542-9349 - - - ~ ::'- - ~ ~t -3068"- ;;- - - - I 2~ - - - -- - - _. - -1 PORCH .2x4 studs 16" oc, 7/16 OSB sheathing, vinyl siding, aluminun soffit facia 6112 pilch roof trusses 24" O.C., 112" OSS rook sheathing v ,-----------1------------, 'I I -.( \ I I' I 'I , co I \ I I ~ I io I \ 1 I , ~ !P LL. . "I WMe steel raised panel insulated , I \ 1 door ." 1 2-2x14 header . I ..... I ----1c I 11'3 'I, -. '. '. 26' _.' . u_ 3030 Extend porch 3' towards garage " - - - ..". -"-'J."'--''''''''',- - /.--'" .r,;'/ Nj:W "y GARAGE ....-....> I I I 2830 2830 ,- APPROVAl. . DATE " I I <or N . . ,~""~." \.': . '~*i' I; ~,;,." , -:r.o ,i' -,- "'". ~o..1.f~cj .) .~~ --- I i i I ~ I'.;" ' \~'''' ti~- \ilg~ ~~~~. 11< i'~ ~r~''1' d: ( I ~ . ~I.'. iI ill 'J . , " '- tJ'cw 'Z"'Cf\<" [E . , ) '5' Adc:\-tt! 1""0 6ree'A,.. ~ ... ::J \ RemovelReplace front stoop I' 2030 20:' l 3068 ~~ 24'3 'I ,------------------------ I I I (D \ I ~ I '" \ I l'3 !!' L... \ I White steel raised panel Insulated \ I door . . \ I 2-2x14 header 1--1 I' 'Y , , 16070 I I - "- 26' .-' I 11'3 '- "- __... .. Jim & Kathy Mancell 1117 Pennsilvania Ave N Golden Vallev. MN 55427 763-542-9349 POWllr NEW GARAGE PORCH . --.- ..---.. ----- Extend poroh 3' towards garage ,Y -.....-..- 2830 2830 3030 APPROVAL . . 2x4 studs 16" 00,7/16 OSS sheathing, vinyl siding, aluminun soffit faoia 6/12 pitch roof trusses 24" O. C., 1/2" OSS rook sheathing y ~ DATE . /)"/.. II /f2. oS)? S^~\-~-.".) /<:,#peJ r 25" 'I" S-~,""SI.Q . . I i . I I i .--".::'-'\! , '2. 21< Ii.{ HWer I I I Z:Kc' Fly~^~~ \ X. 6 - Ff>IC'-A \ ~ "$- ""Dr.:? Sclse.., ? x.c{ W'ct\ \ S-- /(../(' O. c. /,h, oS \S 5~-\\.~ 1'2" L f',~ c;~d~^~ . ----p--.-~:i=----,!r-.---.-~:-i a., -.--,.--....~ . ~~.7.: .'-., ;,..... .'.' ".~ '~-~~..:::..:.. I\la\ \-;;;:::)11 --_.~.---- \\\:=l1L .::'\~il 1\ d\\- . .: \1... t'..t. 1,,':"- ~ " . s', de.. c (t?o ~ S' S""ec.1- <>r--.- l CR (01(, 011 ~( c. Q 'l /6r:: BI/ ~.::ofcJ1; wwmcigQMm_vll~ Y . 8-10-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 1117 Pennsylvania Avenue North Jim and Kathy Mancell Jim and Kathy Mancell, with property located at 1117 Pennsylvania Avenue North, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for one variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition onto the side of the existing home. This construction project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code . states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 70 feet and less than 100 feet, the side setback shall be 15% of lot width. The requested variance is for 8.05 feet off the required 13.05 feet to a distance of 5 feet on the at its closest point to the north side property line for the proposed garage addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M.. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . . August 25, 2001 We have lived at 1205 Pennsylvania Avenue North since July 1972. We love our community and have been blessed with fine neighbors, including Jim and Kathy Mancell. We've been asked to approve a variance to build an extra large double garage. Ordinance says it should be 13.05 feet. The request is build five (5) feet from the lot line, a variation of 8.05 feet. . We oppose this variance. Weare willing to compromise. We understand the Mancell's want and need to add garage space. However, we also have wants and needs. We've made a significant investment in our house and property, maintaining them through the years so as to maximize this investment. Space between houses protects not only privacy, but also the appearance and desirability of a piece of real estate. This is true not only for our property for every property. This is why the City requires a setback of 15% of lot width. Without it, the feel is constricted: urban, not suburban. The proposed addition simply will impose too close to our lot line. We treasure our space. We've paid for this space. There is safety in space - for example, in case of fire. . Furthermore, our house is elevated. We would look out at, and down on, a massive roof that extends even beyond the wall of the garage. These changes will impact the curb appeal of our home, important especially in a competitive market, and affect the way we feel about our property and space. We have already suffered a dramatic blow when the City permitted the Golden Valley Golf Course - without input from adjacent taxpaying property owners - to ignore ordinance and grow weeds and scrub trees. This resulted in total loss of our spectacular view of the City of Minneapolis skyline - which was the primary reason why we bought and built on our lot. According to conversations with city assessors over the years, we are taxed for that view. While that phony "bird sanctuary" is not the issue tonight, it is a factor in our decision. .. . . . .. Page 2 of 2 We hope Kathy and Jim and Jim's father are our next-door neighbors for a very long time. But lef s face it: people do move. The Mancells are the fourth family to live next door since we've been here. Structures stay. We are willing to compromise, permitting the garage to come to nine (9.0) feet from our mutual property line. While a larger garage may be more desirable (we'd like one, ourselves), it can not be considered a hardship to have a standard double garage. We use a lawn shed in our back yard and also rent two garages off-site for our collector vehicles. The 1117 property easily permits extra square footage by building a narrower, deeper garage. An extended section to the rear would create an interesting, private nook for a patio or garden. The porch (and while it may be used as a dining room, it is still a porch) also could be remodeled, in conjunction with the garage, into more practical space. With this concession, we request that we be included in discussions about architectural landscaping (i.e., grading, retaining wall, etc.) between properties, so as to optimize a smooth and attractive transition between lots. Respectfully submitted, &-~ Alan Senander rn~~~ Mary Senander