The URL can be used to link to this page

09-25-01 BZA Agenda . . . I. Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, September 25,2001 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room Approval of Minutes - August 28, 2001 II. The Petitions are: 3235 Kyle Avenue North (Map 3) (01-9-38) Dennis Dienst, Applicant Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks . 1.85 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 33.15 feet for at its closest point to the front yard property line along Adell Avenue. To bring the existing home into conformance with front yard building setback requirements. 1316 Kelly Drive (Map 15) (01-9-39) Joe and Sue Forster, Applicants Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks . 2.2 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 12.8 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the north side yard property line. To allow for the construction of a room addition to the existing home. 6573 Glenwood Avenue (Map 17) (01-9-40) Michael and Judith Stenwick, Applicants Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks . 7.9 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 7.1 feet for the proposed porch addition at its closest point to the south side yard property line. To allow for the construction of a porch addition to the existing home. 1601 Gettysburg Avenue North (Map 20) (01-9-41) Val Levey, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback . 24.24 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 10.76 feet for the proposed room addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Olympia Street. . . . Purpose: Request: Purpose: To allow for the construction of a room addition to the existing home. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12(A) Accessory Buildings . .84 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 4.16 feet for the existing detached garage at its closest point to the north side yard property line. To bring the existing detached garage into conformance with accessory building setback requirements. 4505 Sunset Ridge (Map9) (01-9-42) Deborah Perkins and Rhonda Wiaains. Applicants Request: Purpose: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12(A) Accessory Buildings . 1 foot off the required 10 feet to a distance of 9 feet for the proposed porch addition at its closest point to the swimming pool. To allow for the construction of a porch addition to the existing home. 701 Lilac Drive North (Map 12) (01-9-43) Tennant Company. Applicant Request: Purpose: Request: Purpose: Request: Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(A) Front Yard Requirements . 24.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 10.4 feet for the parking lot at its closest point to the front yard property line along State Highway 100. . 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet for the existing parking lot at its closest point to the front yard property line along State Highway 55. To allow for the construction of a new parking lot and to bring the existing parking lot into conformance with front yard setback requirements. Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(1) Side and Rear Yard Requirements . 15 feet off the required 50 feet to a distance of 35 feet for the existing parking lot at its closest point to the property line along a property in the Residential zoning district. To bring the existing parking lot into conformance with side and rear yard setback requirements. Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 6(C)(2) Side and Rear Yard Requirements . 17.5 feet off the required 25 feet to a distance of 7.5 feet for the existing parking lot at its closest point to the property line along a property at 5738 Olson Memorial Highway. . 17 feet off the required 25 feet to a distance of 8 feet for the existing parking lot at its closest point to the property line along a property at 5730 Olson Memorial Highway. 2 . . . Purpose: Request: Purpose: . 23.6 feet off the required 25 feet to a distance of 1.4 feet for the existing parking lot at its closest point to the property line along a property at 623 Lilac Drive North. To bring the existing parking lots into conformance with side and rear yard setback requirements. Waiver from Section 11.36, Subd. 7(A), (B), and (C) Loading and Parking Requirements . To reduce the parking requirements for this office/warehouse from 778 required parking spaces to 611 parking spaces. To bring the existing site into conformance with parking space requirements. 8100 Wynnwood Road (Map 19) (01-9-44) Craig Halverson, Applicant Request: Purpose: Request: Purpose: Request: Purpose: Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback . 3.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 31.4 feet for the existing garage at its closest point to the front yard property line along Bies Drive. To bring the existing garage into conformance with front yard building setback requirements. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks . 1.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.5 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the west side yard property line. To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setback requirements. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setbacks . 7.75 feet off the required 24.05 feet to a distance of 16.3 feet for the existing garage at its closest point to the rear yard property line. . 3.25 feet off the required 20.8 feet to a distance of 16.3 feet for the proposed porch at its closest point to the rear yard property line. To bring the existing garage into conformance with front yard building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a porch addition to the existing home. Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings . 3.3 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 1.7 feet for the existing shed at its closest point to the west yard property line. . 4 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 6 feet for the existing shed at its closest point to the existing home. 3 . The existing shed is not located completely behind the existing home as is required by the City Code. Purpose: To bring the existing shed into conformance with accessory building requirements. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment e e e , Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2001 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, August 28, 2001, in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Acting Chair Sell called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Those present were members Cera, Sell and Planning Commission Representative Shaffer. Also present were staff liaison Dan Olson and recording tary Lisa Wittman. Absent was member McCracken-Hunt. I. Approval of Minutes - July 24, 2001 Shaffer stated that on page 5, the third paragraph, first stated that typically his answer to variances for new cons "tuld read "Shaffer ould be no," MOVED by Cera, seconded by Shaffer and m July 24, 2001 minutes with the above correcti animously to approve the II. The Petitions are: 1508 Alpine Pass (Map 10 Robert Anderson A Ii Request: on 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setbacks ff the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.9 feet for the entryway addition at its closest point to the front yard line along Alpine Pass. Olson his memo dated August 22,2001 and stated that the applicant thought pplying for this requested variance back in 2000 when he applied for another van ce to build a garage addition onto the side of the home. Olson stated that there was evidence in the file that the applicant did mean to apply for the entryway variance in 2000. Robert Anderson, Applicant, clarified that the drawings and elevations from 2000 did include the front entryway, but that it wasn't indicated on the survey correctly. He stated that he didn't realize the entryway should have been considered a structure. Shaffer stated that in 2000 the Board probably would have approved theentryway and that he had no objections about the entryway now because it has minimal intrusion into the front yard and would blend with the character of the neighborhood. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2001 Page 2 :t MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the variance request for 5.1 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 29.9 feet for the . proposed entryway addition at its closest point to the front yard property line along Alpine Pass. 3940 Glenwood Avenue (Map 8) (01-8-28) Dennis Jordan, Applicant Cera stated that this request was admini Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) ( d Setbacks · 12.5 feet off the required 15 feet t existing home at its closest poi line. 2.5 feet for the ide yard property Purpose: To bring the existing home i building setback require nce with east side yard t he had no concerns with. it. Shaffer stated that since the conditio would recommend approval. g, and the addition is conforming, he MOVED by Shaffer, second variance request for 12.5~,;( existing home at its close_ and motion carried unanimously to approve the uired 15 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet for the to the east side yard property line. e ap 9) (01-8-29) Icant er from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C) (1) Side Yard Setbacks 11.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 3.5 feet for the proposed porch addition at its closest point to the east side yard property line. · 12.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 2.5 feet for the fireplace addition at its closest point to the east side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a porch addition and fireplace to the existing home. Olson referred to his memo dated August 22,2001 and stated that in 1985, a variance was approved for this property so that an attached garage could be built 3.5 feet from the east side yard property line. He stated that the applicant at that time indicated that e he would not be building anything above the garage but sometime after the approval of the garage, a porch addition was built above it without either a building permit or an Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2001 Page 3 e approved variance. He stated that the applicant would like to replace the porch that was added after 1985 and would also like to add a fireplace to the existing home. Shaffer asked for clarification on where the fireplace was going to be. Christy Paulson, Knutson Development Corporation, general contractor, representing the applicant, stated that it would be on the east side of the proposed porch addition. Paulson asked if to the prope close to th roperty line ed that pecific fire code se or if it could go Shaffer stated he is concerned about the fireplace being too cI and that typically five feet is the minimum setback requirem anything built less than three feet from the property line n regulations. Shaffer asked if the fireplace could beinte on a different wall. Scott Knutson, also representing Knutson Devel were trying to use the existing foundation as has a slope and gardens that would make it another reason the applicant wanted the view to the neighbors. oration, stated that they ey could and that the back yard uild there. Olson stated that e east side was to block the e Sell stated he was also concerne line when there are other altern requests in two different pa ireplace being 2.5 feet from the property ommended voting on the variance MOVED by Shaffer, seco variance request for fe proposed porch addit Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the the required 15 feet to a distance of 3.5 feet for the sest point to the east side yard property line. amend the variance request to three feet at its closest point fireplace addition. Shaffer stated concern that that is still too line.- laying the variance request for the fireplace until the contractors had a chance to the applicant who was out of town. Paulson stated that they would like to request a continuance to the September 25, 2001 Board of Zoning AppealS meeting. Olson asked the contactors to submit something in writing letting him know if the applicant decides to come back to the Board, or if she decides to move the fireplace. e MOVED by Cera, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to continue until September 25, 2001, the variance request for 12.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance 2.5 feet for the fireplace addition at its closest point to the east side yard property line. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2001 Page 4 4515 Chatelain Terrace (Map 8) (01-8-30) Ted Lang, Applicant e Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback MOVED by Cera, seconded by Shaffer and moti variance request for 0.18 feet off the required existing home at its closest point to the front . 0.18 feet off the required 35 feet to a dist the existing home at its closest point to line along Chatelain Terrace. Purpose: To bring the existing home into con building setback requirements. animously to approve the a distance of 34.82 feet for the rty line along Chatelain Terrace. 515 Cloverleaf Drive (Map 8) Jim Martens A licant Request: .21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback ,e required 35 feet to a distance of 20.65 feet for g porch at its closest point to the front yard property Cloverleaf Drive. t off the required 35 feet to a distance of23.92 feet for existing home at its closest point to the front yard property along Cloverleaf Drive. e To bring the existing porch and home into conformance with front ard building setback requirements. Sell discu e irregular shape of the lot and how the property may have becorne non-conforming originally. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the requested variance for 14.35 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20.65 feet fore the existing porch at its closest point to the front yard property line along Cloverleaf Drive and 11.08 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 23.92 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Cloverleaf Drive. e e e e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August28,2001 Page 5 1316 Kelly Drive (Map 15) (01-8-32) Joe and Sue Forster, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback . 4.64 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 30.36 feet for the proposed front yard porch at its close to the front yard property line along Kelly Drive. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a fron home. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Side Yard Setbacks . 1.2 feet off the require proposed room additi yard property tin to a distance of 13.8 feet for the sest point to the north side Purpose: To allow for the home. f a room addition to the existing Shaffer asked the applicant t to the drawing that he sub Joe Forster, Applicant, referred Shaffer stated that as n the front yard he doe front porch is open and has a minimal intrusion into y concerns. he could amend his request to 2.2 feet off the required 15 eet from the property line. Shaffer asked why he was ionaI1-foot. Forster stated it would make for a more comfortable MOVED b , seconded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to approve 4.64 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 30.36 feet for the proposed front yard porch at its closest point to the front yard property tine along Kelly Drive. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to approve, with the consent of the City Attorney, the variance request of 2 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13 feet at its closest point to the north side property. If the City Attorney denies the request then the approval reverts back to the 1.2 feet as originally requested and the variance request would be continued to the September 25,2001 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August28,2001 Page 6 7601 Winsdale Street North (Map 15) (01-8-33) David Downs-Reid, Applicant e Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback · .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distan existing home at its closest point to the along Winsdale Street North. · .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a existing home at its closest pain along Quebec Avenue North. .5 feet for the yar roperty line .5 feet for the ard property line Purpose: To bring the existing home int building setback requirem nce with front yard Request: . 12 (A) Accessory Buildings · .5 feet off the proposed propert illilfl;;feet to a distance of 34.5 feet for the rage at its closest point to the front yard lnsdale Street North. Purpose: struction of a detached garage next to the e Shaffer asked if the v accessory buildi h is a corner lot, Q behind the h Id be more than what is being requested because the ehind the existing house. Olson stated that because this onsidered the front so the garage would be completely arage couldn't be moved back .5 feet to eliminate the need for the g variance request. David Downs-Reid stated that originally they were trying to avoid a tree, but that moving the garage back .5 feet would not be a problem. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera to approve the variance request for.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Winsdale Street North and .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Quebec Avenue North to bring the existing home into conformance with front yard building setback requirements. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera to deny the variance request for .5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.5 feet for the proposed detached garage at its closest point to the front yard property line along Winsdale Street North. e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2001 Page 7 e 1815 HiUsboro Avenue North (Map 20) (01-8-34) Thomas and Jane Toleno. Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback e . .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distan existing home at its closest point to the along Hillsboro Avenue North. . 12.3 feet off the required 35 feet t the proposed deck addition at it property line along Hillsboro Av .7 feet for the roperty line 22.7 feet for t to the front yard Purpose: To bring the existing home i building setback require deck add ition to the front nce with front yard to a ow for the construction of a ting home. Request: bd.7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setback . 6.8 feet 0 existing the n d 15 feet to a distance of 8.2 feet for the the proposed deck at its closest point to ard property line. Purpose: xisting home into conformance with side yard building irements and to allow for the construction of a deck e existing home. r from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings . 15 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the existing freestanding deck at its closest pointto the front yard property line along Wheeler Boulevard. . 3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 feet for the existing shed at its closest point to the front yard property line along Wheeler Boulevard. . 7 feet off the required 10 feet to a distance of 3 feet for the distance between the existing freestanding deck and the existing shed. Purpose: To bring the existing freestanding deck and shed into conformance with accessory building setback requirements. e Thomas Toleno, Applicant, stated that the shed was built before the freestanding deck and was originally located behind the house and that when they built the deck behind the house the shed was moved across the property and they didn't realize there had to be 10 feet between the freestanding deck and the shed. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2001 Page 8 Shaffer stated that he had no concerns regarding the existing conditions and the e variances that are being requested for those conditions, but that he did have concerns about the new construction variances that are being requested. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the request for .3 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34.7 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the front yard property line along Hills enue North, 6.8 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 8.2 feet for the e, 15 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 20 feet for the existin deck at its closest point to the front yard property line along Wheeler .eet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 32 feet for the existing sest point to the front yard property line along Wheeler Boulevard and 7 equired 10 feet to a distance of 3 feet for the distance between the exis' g f ng deck and the existing shed. Shaffer stated that the proposed deck is prot typically the City has allowed front porch the deck could be put somewhere else building a patio instead. Hestated th uch into the front yard and that ks. He asked the applicant if , or if they had thought about see a hardship in this case. T oleno stated they would like t deck. lass door off of the living room onto the e Cera agreed that he didn k is protruding too much into the front yard setback. d by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to deny the e required 35 feet to a distance of 22.7 feet for the proposed losest point to the front yard property line along Hillsboro Avenue the required 15 feet to a distance of 8.2 feet fore the proposed point to the north side yard property line. 6837 Winsdale Street North (Map 15) (01-8-35) Nathan and Tess Lilly, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setback · 7.9 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 7.1 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the west side yard property line. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setbacks. e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2001 Page 9 . Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings . The detached garage is not located completely behind the existing home as is required by the City Code. Olson stated that the applicants are requesting variances the existing home and garage. Purpose: To bring an existing detached garage into co Accessory Building setback requirements. Sell asked the applicants if they had anything to d was. Nathan Lilly, applicant, stated that the garage when he bought the house. in the 1970's and it was there e MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Ce request for 7.9 feet off the requir home at its closest point to the from section 11.21, Subd. 1 completely behind the exi carried unanimously to approve the a distance of 7.1 feet for the existing property line and to approve a waiver would allow the garage to not be located er.from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setback 3.17 feet off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 9.58 feet for the proposed garage at its closest point to the north side yard property line. . 2.1 feet off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 10.8 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the south side yard property line. Purpose: To bring the existing home into conformance with side yard building setbacks and to allow for the construction of a new attached garage to the existing home. Olson referred to a letter received from Carol Teal who lives next door to the applicant e at 1323 June Avenue. Donald Herstein, applicant's builder, stated that currently the garage is 17.5 feet wide and that it's difficult to fit two cars in it. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2001 Page 10 Shaffer asked if the proposed garage addition could have a hip roof instead of a gable e roof to be less imposing. Herstein stated that they are trying to match the look of the existing house. Sell stated thatthe City has typically been allowing 20..;foot garages and that he didn't have any concerns about adding 2.5 feet to the garage. f~ere are already bushes and tall hedges along .a property line and that he would like to still be able to e Carol Teal, 1323 June Avenue, asked if the applicant had co garage deeper instead of wider because it would end up b property line. Shaffer stated that the City considers having a one- ar that the existing garage is a substandard 2-car gar proposed would still be smaller than a standar Teal asked if there could be grass or ever to act as a buffer between the properties. Shaffer agreed that plantings, rat halt right up to the property line, would soften the impact to that area n Thomas Deans, applicant, retaining wall and a deck park next to the gara Shaffer stated th they are asking f line. existing house is already into the setback and now that would be a good gesture to put plantings along that property MOVED by onded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to approve the reques r 3. et off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 9.58 feet for the propose at its closest point to the north side yard property line and for 2.1 feet off the required 12.75 feet to a distance of 10.8 feet for the existing home at its closest point to the south side yard property line with the condition that there be some landscaping done on the north side yard property line. 1117 Pennsylvania Avenue North (Map 16) (01-8-37) Jim and Kathy Mancell. Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (C)(1) Side Yard Setback · 8.05 feet off the required 13.05 feet to a distance of 5 feet for the proposed garage at its closest point to the north side yard property line. e . e e ~ .. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2001 Page 11 Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new attached garage to the existing home. Olson clarified that part of the variance request is for the expansion of an existing breezeway, and the other part of the variance is for a new 2-car Jim Mancell, applicant, stated that they would like to add thr so it would be a more useable dining room space and the feet, 2-car garage. e breezeway a 24 feet by 24 Sell stated that 20 feet by 24 feet would be better yard setbacks as much. Kathy Mancell, applicant stated that she thou for a garage. Sell stated that 24 feet by encroaching on any setbacks. Mancel foundation and footings in the back 0 the same in the front of the house by 24 feet was a standard size e standard if it wasn't ere trying to use the existing nd they wanted to keep the sightline Alan and Mary Senander, 12 garage is a hardship, but t to their property line and They stated that they 0 to be 21 feet wide ins instead of the. re Ivania, stated they understand that a single car e cerns about the garage addition being too close t would do to their property value and curb appeal. ore comfortable with the proposal if the garage were eet wide and nine feet away from the property line e et. e variance to 5.05 feet off the required 13.05 feet to a or the proposed garage, which would still allow for a 12-foot dining de less on the side yard setback. Shaffer s agreed with compromising to a 12-foot wide dining room and a 22- foot wide garage to minimally intrude on the side yard setbacks. MOVED by Shaffer, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve 5.05 feet off the required 13.05 feet to a distance of 8 feet for the proposed garage at its closest point to the north side yard property line. III. Other Business No other business was discussed. IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m. ., . 3235 Kyle Avenue North . 01-9-38 Dennis Dienst . . t . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 3235 Kyle Avenue North (Map 3) (01-9-38) Dennis Dienst, Applicant Date: September 19, 2001 Dennis Dienst, with property located at 3235 Kyle Avenue North, is requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build an attached garage. This garage meets building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home does not meet setback requirements. City Staff has allowed the applicant to sign off on a "Hold Harmless" form in order to receive a building permit for the remodeling project. This was done only after the applicant had submitted the required survey and application materials. The Hold Harmless form is attached. · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for 1.85 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 33.15 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Adell Avenue for the existing home. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in February of 1952 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 3235 Kyle Avenue North Dennis Dienst, Applicant , f' r:;;:~~ ~~.~.::;:,~ : g;: J;: ;:.: ,:.~: ::~ 13 ';1t.~6 ~ ';"",,15 ~ &. .:tn.)6 .: -3 , 5 ~o.;", 16 : .; t'MA5 -3 ,,, .:I'Zl.,~6 ~ .:I'n.,15 ~ . A~.E ,f Ie.: ~_ 14 .t, V. 4503 CITY OEo GOLOEN VALLE 4401 .. 31 ~... ii1...... 1/!'~'14~1,-",-~r.,. ''''''../ !:J/ r,20~ "~J;:: '~f ~ 114." "20LiiI ~r'r. 17UZ 't~~~O; 113.~. ~~ .i~;':$ f~4.: ~:a.l i .IJi~-'-l~. _1 )'MI. ';l::'.19~ z-~t.~~ ""~"'':3;;; 2.~~ ,....2l ~ 1J/!.~2.~~~' ,,;.r 2 ""' IZ8.' -;;;;:;,-.. ICZ 4' .... i 1%11" 3 .It "::J ~ F · Z94.'4 ~ , -l::1i ,Z94 lj, 19 3 -'_.. ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 3 ~ ... ' · 18 3. ::' i:l~ · 12 ~ 3 . ~~::c o1l. '" .;; -~". ! Z~4,~ ~ '" IZf ~._ ;'1,41__" l6<>.c ~~ ~,:"" ... ~, ,,, ~J l!~; ,. 18 4. a ;1~94 ~ ~, .17 4. ~ ~'''' 1::.11 4 . ~:;;~ ; ~.w.~ 'Jt.'~" ..l~ 1 Z'7.53 _~<< .. -; ""'z - "'~. i'" ....." ,J . .. ~ l. ... j~ ~. 17 5. ' ~ ~ " i'AII 5~ r'~' .16 5. ':!~ '.10 ~:. !l.;;;~~~~ 141. 'UA Ir., -- - - - - - --i:, ~~ I D' ~~o 1~'S'~;~I-Jlj'i~-.~'~~.16~ ~~ ~ .~~:.t ~f~'!~ '.15, 6.'~ ~.9 ':;~ _6.:<", q,::. 15'~ 11/ .', . T <-ir - fz5 IZ'/.S i4Jr-, ~~1~::: "~ .; ~ ~. 1 "7 SR ~ " _ ,~~ ~ ~'~.15 7 g~ "l ,D1.Z1~ ..' 14' 7. 'fj !.. ~ . 8 : ':;' 7/(1;" !i, 'It ,,1.8 "i.1~ _ ~. '" ~ ~ ... .. .. 1'10 ~- f{;,,,,~ ~~"-. 8 o~ - h"f.s Ito ,. ""'';<.14 :p".:. J;7.85 "- . ~ . .13' e.' "l CROSS'~ANE ~. .!'" /4Z4 - '.: ~~! t;, ~ - i:l .~ J~4'J6" '" ~.. ... 3:41 0 . '~~e-;;,'lJ.~ 13 ~ ~.. ~ ~.'2 ~ 9.... g ~""'!-, '&>4 '''' ...Il ~ 10 .. IZl IZ5" .. ;. .. 'I :\~:: liD ~" :J - . 113 -;+ "'"- . ~ ~ ~ "'.5 1f'-5 e,% ~... , 12"" II... "'-...." ~ 10 lil ---"" lP-.....r. 0\ ., '" ~ "! . 12 ":! 11 .. IDS pto r .. -s:>"... . '? .... \ \.88 :. It. = :J "Ozo ',,40, ~.o '::! 1:) / .<~ -; 0 ~ 1'\ S4.a.1 ,I-r~ ., "~{l.s '. ISIZ .... / ;::,: - '<',o,S "~442 .l I ""' . l'~' /!JI .., '''n, "5 PZo" 4{), d'410.fo' \ b~'f.2;,,,.\i r. "",zrlt' . 'os : I "Ion ~l.J \ 'rlf <..,:' i'" ~ ~zo 1/" : <""/. ...'!:.. · Ia:ll~ .a. '" Q" . 'f- .1' \ ~~ 'r\ 25' .... J' ,,, ..:;: ~ -'.. .. g,i41.. ' ~ -~ \ ~, ..'.i\ :>i. .'4',l ;: '" o_ le III ~ . .. 11.'''~''~f:> ~!;. ~3 ... . ;; I 2.~1l<, 19 ~ 1.~~-~;'&-'!.'4Z.t-4 2.~'" g~.24 011 ."::.. . .. .tZ, ,z., ... 0 'J/,4" I)' _ IYiZ_ --I i7LZ ~~~~ .~ 3.~l fl';'le:~ 2. ~1t~;;'!-22 :! 3 ..~ : 23 -j,)g 2 ! ..!~." .-n:-V.. IZU ~il oz'-l lii }.,.4 I.,. I Z ..~ .., 141.1 ~ "", '~~~y. ~...... "< 131 ---__ J~~~19 ~':"'~!~~!.'7: 3.!~:~~.21 h~ 4e~rg ~~.22! 3 ~ "': c- ,2<" ",- ii<:i" ~ 1iZ:,- - m:r F'--'" ,...r /1;';;' .~ .. iIo.. ... ~ _ ~ . .. flZ~ ""', 6~._ '<18."-___ ~ "'f8 ;;:"' 5' ~ 16! ~ 4 ~ ~ 20 ~ 5 , ;:;; ;-- 21 "! ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~.II -: -T'l.." ~ .. 46/0 ~ 4620 :,lll ~,,.'05 ;1 0 22 j "'"em: ~ ~ 21 ;. 4 -"Z(;Z8.34 Res,- I~ '1'-" I~~ - '* to ""'''''115' .il olt 10 .:jllJo26 -4 '4:~ 0 '2S"~:~: ~ -= L!w.L .~ ~ ~ ,; z, '''''' ~ .. ,:~:; ~' ~17 ~ -;pr" ;:/ ~ ~f5~ 0* :c l' ~ ~Jo . ol!. 16 17 G. ~" 16 ~~. , 18 . " 13 '17 ' ' 14 ,. ", 16 ,*' 15' 14 '1;'413 "L 14 ~!l 15 -li 14 I .:I 30'~3 3 (rz~ 29. 2. 28,zl..: --3 27 4 z ~ (.? z ::J !S Q) \00 ." ,'" ." . . . (Revised 1/9~) Petition Number r)/- 1-.3 fJ Date Received 8/17/0 I ~ Amount Received 1/ 50.~ {') 0 (r.a S~) ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 3).35- v.~~. A-v~.vl/~ ):/o/2nf. _ (; V u,;J . ~~-V~"2 . ~. . .. .'. ,. . 2. BZA Petition Date Petitioner: j:),.e"1 t1 ( \ n f ;-M ~T N3;~~- t:,'/e O-t'VI'W.{LPdldt ,6~V~ Address ~ CitY/State/Zip 7 9.J-iJ-ey3b -k.?~~ "? ,. -:/tb-?-s-,;}.-9-6/d.-O Business Phone Home Phone 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: ifk- 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Lp'r 1-1 13L-pCIL ~ JJbfJU~-6,aou~ , ../ 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: ~gle Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. L/~~ tr .XKkJ~ ~ Il/JiYf- 35 Z~;;/- .~t3~ ... .. y 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the B()llrd of Zoning Appeals Application Fee'lli~ ' . \_ ~ .. o. ..... J1~! . Signature of pplicant ' UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application.forwaiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent tothe subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name Comment I~?~ ~ t.. .~ ~ tfJ~.. 'r~fA- Signature Address tfCf~ MLf ~.. , Print Name_KO\o'te.. tJe... Vl'te.. S <;M l t-",",,- . Comment ~ 'De-\/;V~k- Ac;ldress 3d. ~c Le..e A~ N Signature Print Name Comment 5o~ ^- ~.I4!Z..-t-:::,o ~ ~~ZL Address 3~dS- ~ 0<-<- Signature Print Name Comment Signature Address . 5~3~- Jt,CZe.~.;J c/"l;.J/~ Street Address . "HOLD HARMLESS' ""'- I, DeV1V1 ; ':> K-. b \~Vl ~-;m requesting the City of Golden Valley to allow me to proceed with a(n) {~rl!Z,.;t(;,e eft t>2--z:t<- onto my house. I understand that my existing structure is nonconforming and that I will proceed to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to request a variance(s) for this nonconformity. At this time I submit this "Hold Harmless" letter which would allow me to proceed with my construction plans. I understand that if the variance is not granted I will discontinue what I am doing and put the land back to its original state with no fault to the City of Golden Valley. j)bJrJJ~ L j)let-Jsr- . ~et~~ SijJ~> Dafe )J 6~ O~ City of Golden Valley Staff Signature . ftJVN~ 'DAN ~So,J 0~ f~~ APRil A VE. ........- ...,..-'~~ --ro-"1RC)N- r' , fD ",0>1 108.20 !lET tROW 6 =95'37'1 0" R"-1a,p .-" ...',,' L=30'F5 I , , . b. =00'20'"37" ~","306.90 L=~.84--'-, '-', . . . " I , , . l! :.l i ^ \ SElII\01l , NORTH '<t <Xl ..; <Xl ~ b '<t Q, _'n. 2~ _. I"'l o o z SCALE I" = 20' 1,\ {i~ 0Ll~_. -' \ . {lIJilDINC SEfa.lD( UN[ v' .nuH 35.34 _...on --r , ~ . sa I/lOO ~F )2.~. SET IRfJH S8B'13'25"W 130.48 . SURVEY FOR: DENNIS DIENST PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3235 Kyle Avenue North, Golden Valley. Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1; Block 5, NOBLE-GROVE according to the recorded plot thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby cert.ify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any. thereon, and 011 visible encroochmen ts, if any. from or on said land. Dated this 7th day of May. 1999. Revised this 20th day of May, 1999. by: 6i~ Minnesota License No. 20281 NOTES: 1. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the South line of Lot t, Block 5, NOBLE-GROVE which is o~sumed to have 0 bearing of South 88 degrees 13 minutes 25 seconds West. 2. Area of the property described hereon is 11,367 square feet or 0.2610 acres. . 3. '''0 title work was furnished for the preparation of this survey to verify the existence of any easements or encumbrances. 2605-25 47a5 EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK INC. ~::;. W~~t~:'b"~:Wd SURVEYORS Tole: ('61~ 548-6837 25143Rl . . . . olinw.cigoum~JJ~y . 9-6-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals Valley Road MN 55427-4588 3235 Kyle Avenue North Dennis Dienst, Applicant (fax) (TDIl) Dennis Dienst, with property located at 3235 Kyle Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to build a garage onto the side of the existing home. This proposed garage meets building setback requirements. However, during the construction planning process, it was discovered that the existing home does not meet building setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the fOllowing section of City Code. and Council · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code . states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for 1.85 feet off the required 35 feet.to a distance of33.15 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Adell Avenue for the existing home. Licensing This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, September 25, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. and Zoning Adjacent properties require notification. Parkway MN 55426-1364 (fax) (TDIl) . f . . . 1316 Kelly Drive 01-9-39 . Joe and Sue Forster . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 1316 Kelly Drive (Map 15) (01-9-39) Joe and Sue Forster, Applicants Date: September 19, 2001 Joe and Sue Forster, with property located at 1316 Kelly Drive, are requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). This variance request had originally been heard at the August 28th meeting along with a variance request for a front yard porch. The variance for the porch was approved by the Board, but this variance was continued until the September meeting because. of a change in the original porch variance request. The City Attorney has recommended that since this variance request is different from the original request, adjacent property owners need to be re-notified. Staff has done this. This variance request is for a room addition onto the north side of the existing home. This room addition requires the following variance from building setback requirements: · The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 2.2 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 12.8 feet on its closest point to the north side property line for the proposed room addition. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in September of 1953 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. SubjeciProperty: 1316 Kelly Drive Joe and Sue Forster, Applicants , . . \ -- ~ -. - - "-,, .-. """'" , .I~, ,1 ~ .....'1. z ,'I.LI;;< ~, , -:O~AA't(\"Ht.~i --:or-.i ..,.., 31, I'll ~!e, "'I .,n.! ~ I;::; <> ~" g <> rw :te'r11=:> :::: Pori olLof 4 ~ ~ '"~ I" IU ~Ji'...l' ,.... I ,!(!,!(!:j..13 ~ 12 '~,:t~. . <':~t~ 1.LI::ll:":I"4~N~ :ZMI";~':::a:: t ;~'/nWi!i';.:I).., -3 ;;)"yv,,:.,,~~ b 1"'" .,q." 1 ''''1:;;' - g ~~" a:: '.:: (J)" N"'4'~'W~ '0 ~ JI' '~z:; ~,.,<.;. ,>' ~ I :.Ii 'n,.. ,,~.. r .~FiltJ2-2H' - 4r~.~~oo .",f't\;::~. Ii". "'''''5Tfl ..AD, ". to ~1' \1 U.1 It, ~ ~ : ~ ~1"'.15 I _~= IW.tit _.aoo ~:.; ~~.2~= ~~ ~ IDO' 100 "f ,.u1"SIl~~ ~ . j.~ .,.~P\::;', , '" 0 ISIJ'7';A~ -- ;0.,.. --'--"']$ ...". 12S t?!:.l>r liT ~~: ,.. ~o~.,." 'tS.!4 .po I I \ 40!:: I.... ~ ISo.,\:!i'''' -,.. -, R.:~I.~' ~J: ~ "''fS'~ : FRANSSEL ADD~ 71$) I .o~ II ~ 2. i '", ':il ,: - e14.., I:~ ~.:; '~"'7_ -~~' 3"~ l~g ~:~. II 2uo~=!.'.o';J~;f 7/~0 "'.! ~f.J041~~'45 tit ~ . I ';i 6 \'i~ I ,.".. ." .. 7,['310" 17S." . /11 S05..' .. ~.~~. ~~'HI ~;;. ~ I a: ,~~.I}" t "., -.., ~\~,,;~; .' ,'4J'W. :,..~OI.YMPtA_"'^7 !':T. '-"''''I:/II'iLI,~-..n;;;~~'..ls.I..-.. ~~ '-.S .~..... ~ 12S,,~ ~ '15 <t ~!( I w.'l'" ~ ~"'~ In,' 7205 ...."JPt' ,IID9,~ (fi'.1. ,JC~ ~ VA"_"_,,.,u __. '",el. 1 "'. f'''' n\ :\ " 2 "'Q So ~. 7t 44 "'; I...... 14648. :'tl !;; II1;Z. ... ,~'~.~ ,,( I t! ~ f:::;:'i'. _ _ ~';! .. ".;:.. ~S V""5 :: 3 .,l;~~ :::4 f.),."~,,;,;,,,. "O!. "'., a ~2.:; C'llS61,,~.: '.~.~ ~rQI"".!.!.? ....l. m'" -----~-~~.'2 -',i_:~~~~'l'" ~~~2 g~v ~ i,~~':~I~ -\:2"S'lo(~P::lOS5~ I.LI' II . LJr4---';' "'...."S '~~''S''r", C"\~.I' E SO.. - /4656 '~/46.57 . ::l~'-' ~~ ItS.~ ~ ,'Ill 50 $I"l 52 ;:) ------1I.~-----~~"e4 ..()~", ~ ~3~~" I\.,.V-'2' '~ ~'.3 I"\'=' c. I' <> I'J- ~j; .,.: q. 10 r:..~~ ~~-.v".34i~~ .3g.... - ";~..r 2 ~s~o ~VO 4.~~.~ 3.: 4.g~r"l :t'_; 1..= !!!!j. ' 7!(!-i ,. J'i';;" '7~ - so 10. ~:&' 1".4' '.1 "~,, !lr'I,,'m. ,,!!! ,. ~a"17wl -~. " . 0 _ !!! .. ~. 125. .Na"14''''W t,.. 0~1 ..." 1"'5 If"" u~.. fa Its ~:N" I t;j ;, '.Re ::' ~ - Q tlj- ~ 101.'\11 ~ -. . ~ 10411 10Ul'it :-p ~ ~ <;~---- ~ ;'.2~laJ!,~I;~'!!!'3'i.~T"" en · ..<>~. ii.'~'r.:;;';~ ~1:tir~ ::,~r:;~'~14~:14~14!J'! !!! ~ lOt ~ l.!'.::i 0.. , ,.. ' -a..- ~~ PART OF ~-':ANL R W ~.. I ...::::'~~. ~'.;; . ; I . I · z .~<.J U . I Q) =-,.. '.~ ;' --'.t; ...lli.._ '1 .o'! "'- s. '''' ~'; ~ ..; 1D "'~"" <t!, ~ II "0 N . _" f-1.0'L....6_ :n.It ~ 5 1 . ~.," 7WO I~Q _I 'l'D ... ~2....... 0:: ..~ :!: -I ...~/ "'F,,~I~ ~~. ~~ a "'lKRU ZIG"" ~ '" 70571O.JT <>" 14 ~I " ILl ~..- 0:... padlo.' . - J ", ..' -,j.. A ~,. 1~. Z ;; li:r 4'10.1 ::.L 1"1 ..~. ~ .". ."- ~ lLI . "",_ ... _ .".n .',;1;:: ~!-;-----' -----c; :i ---31Y .~i=~ In IO.D:" ~ I': -v' Itl," JI-$~- ;II~L- ~''- ~,.:~ ~I~ 2~ ~..... '1 3~' -~: '" " ~ ~'~I i ~ 4...., !._,,>- \45" 4,1\ 11\41 ~ill!"-'--- -----~ ti:i...lIJ "~<t · ~ i,,1 ;:..4 :; .3~;; ~ADDI.r10N;i~r .I~~I "1-: ~ . It ... ..- ~ . :a "',' - ,- - ~ ,,_' -", I ,.1 .. ....... ;J · ... ~: r-:. .. -'. f'<l _if /'If If 1'0 '1416 ~ It, i:1; 1.1" )0'\ 4 I tI .. 10 .~""'. :i: ~ U 4 ., 'i I -T.8.i,- ~ . ~1S "Ill.. II Zl MIl'ITZS'lll1l5 /25 !., tl 1,..:\1 ~~~ II J!) 4.~~li"'" --li"~,d"'~~. C I - '" e. iSE ~ t) -=- lr'I ~ .; ~-:t . "'1.:-.---- l;)____~~i..NI'} ,,~:;., 1/ Da~fo'!L~I/()~. ~i:\. ~~PROS!>I ';"~8. ",., ~;; tl'~lW"~J~~:tt~~llrin ~ 0"": ID:f.'O~_,~, 'oJ-Q.J !t\ N'I~"" t-....... ':0'<45 ~"I'" .. "'''tr"!.~=I~; ;:s__{-:- :~ _::~':J.:l 744 'ST.~~:'l';~l~, .~ h~: ~_~;.~ :;~HEIGH S ~-1t~'!5~1'1" ~<>" . i:: 1-0 :<'t-. :lo,N I /80 ~ +.! '-~~ ..... -j; 22"" ~i 7 21 :: ~ 7(J5'I:. 7(" ~~" r ": '-1 ~~ I; - ..J ""4 '!'~:t'.l\ ~ ~.~ - 1;;): .:: .-0 .R ~.711 ~,..... -- -.--.- ~- Z --,~_ ~ . - .; ;r:'\....~ ..... ~ OIlt"z ...- Il~ -.. '" 1iifl;; S"''' S.. ,.. ., ., ~ .... .. '" .. .,.-: ..... 2 "'0 " ADDIT ON "," :r- 1 :: '" 1$ r "' '" u u'" ,!:;;l .. '" 0 c - '1 1:...J . \), '" ~ ~ .. . lll, fI.'i. 4 _752'-754 .:. ~'~02 ..luN::" ""'U' . ;; ~:d ~ ~ .3:i ~ ~t~ ~ ~~~..,,,~~:: 3.;;~., ~ 24ill ~li ItH 14 "':" 7,",:' .7!i0l. - "l) ,2.-~'/SS ..l'. ~ ~ ~ ',,;;. ,-: .,r.:'," .. - 11~ ,,~ I I : '0 l."'O 0 :: NI' 3 '" : : 11001 . -:t.~ m.... rfCH I., 1 S. _c. . - - - l'" ~~"o. "~ ~ l!) -0 ---- ~:;'--'" - ~.4';-~~~~":!f. 4.;;"'~ '7' I _ t;;~.aS 4 .5 Z+'_ z2~CJ)(\J;r:3 2' · !!!! orlo "!l!'~" ..~~'.!; '"""""E''''~ ~ I;;; ~!! -. I <t 3~ - ! -,'s D.'!r.! of Lol 9 4. P ,< ~ .:' =" Ita. 17' -J 'I 11 13(1H5 1334 n ,. . ^ =.. : ~~ ~ 'i~;:o ""0 ~ ~~ .. T. 10. 7., '~'Ii~:-~ ~~ 4"~~' ":'~{''; ~ ;;~ . ''i~:. . ~ (I) ~..... ,.l\ 4 "'!; . (I) ~ .~ p.r"'I:"'li "",;,... ~;.;.. - ..; ~ 1..",..1'- s. I' - · ?i204,,~.., ::.;, 9 C l!:! ~~, ~.11;1T l.f!.''';;~:'il!V.~LLE),.!!' 7054" 8 , ,^:l ~ ;;Z-'~' ~':J!. .. -:.," -'. -Ltl' 1/)..1. 'Il'" 1 ;'.5' -'0' ~~Lr 't-1l'. .. ..R . I~:~. r,~". ,(1),...,-. ",.jl;!"3~ ~~;~;:;,..~I1!.~ ~n>ol I - · ~~ i:; &: ~..:.=.. CD ~. ~I;, / ~1f7IEWI' ~:;_ "~g ~~. 3 A~l~,ni.\"I; -f-- ,~L '"4\,, , .. _e.- _~:ll ~". .~, R' _ ",;:0 "<( . ~ I ~ ~t>i' . rmiJl-,n",,, " '0 I . ' . ,In!. - .. 1"7 .. - .. oL... i so~, .' I ~"30 ... ''''> -J; ,_".. . -"P/l\;'ii :::\ :;!j 1;. AVE""". . 7'512 7~: ,a "" , , ~.. tlO IJO DIJ. r -.. s~.~ s: . t \) '.' _., ... cf. ..,. :{..aoJ{rli(...l1r.,.roI4I.U~ .. ._...~ PLYMOUTH 7210 TI~O AVE._;~7jio \30 4IU?l_j.:~:.. \"5-1"1" ~8'1'I.nOw \, . 7400 7310:~ .' .- .......::.~ .........._ " .. Zh.ZZ.05Res. .... . .-318..... .. I I . "<>:::" ~~_. ;1. 4. '0 . , yilt. 1\. ">, .c~ 4l~. ,(, ...;' ~ ,~ojo: *i!, ~,." t. ... 'lio'... ,'Ol.", -1- SURVEY FOR: Mr..Joe Forester DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Block 2, PETERSON"S VALLEY ., VIEW ADDITION, City of Golden Valley, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ~otes lion ~onuments ~und & set) , ~ .scALE: 1"~30' J-bn !J(y'tO & 4w(!.ia~ flnc. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS (612) 421-9126 13021 VINEWOODLANE DAVTON. MN 5532:7 NOTE: This property is subject to any and all easements of record. No attempt has been made by tis to locate same. Nbt,...,.,.J - JtJ5:0- / I" I , ./ (' U \/ '\ ~/ loft, .~....~rjJ /~ , l., 1-1.1 , I ,~ ~ III ~ :? ...... ... !XI V) "-.._A f l.u 1'0 <:I ,0 ~u '" o~ I~ III ~ ~:~ "V 40.1>(" - J 05'.0 NOIrr/4 KrLL.Y p~,V~ . I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct sUPervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State inn osta. Dated April 17, 2001. Vv.'fi C{V\ 0-'6 \)0. \" ; QV\ e.. E ( C N<2E"TE c.... , Minnesota License No. 12267 \Q..e~ 1,.,)', >( ed -t 0 n.e.<i'v~ 'f fe\ +0 ~Q'f-t\... <; id$: .=, \. 19 I lve<s+ / f' ro~'\.+ -::. ;. G. Y I \ (Revised 1/99) Date Received o,-~ -1}.. ",.,Il QI-~-3 f/7J 01 Petition Number Amount Received S 5'"0.. oJ ($50 residential- $150. other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY.OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 2. \3\~. ~e\l'f \)R~ BZA Petition Date -F\ \j 9 \j<; + ~~ th )..00\ .........---. Petitioner: ~O~. q. Sue... 'fOrs-k..r Name \ ~i (~ \L.f ~ \'\J lJr, (;n)J~y\ ~ct. \ \~y jM~ S5'i')l Address.. . City/State/Zie... 7lo~- 55<1- ~ ~Go~ J lJ:J~ -- 5LJL)- '/57:2 Business Phone Home Phone 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: t-\.. ) At 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Lo.t- r; , \ilor $ :l. I . ,) \ E \~ ~dJ.: +', 0\1') . '$e-kfsO~< 'JCt\\~y (' ; +'1 ()-f 1i~f\ <"I'" lie y \ V) Y\. e. p; (\ eov {\ -{. "I 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: Ii. Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . 7. . . 8. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in thispe.tition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. (. " A) We., -.:l \ eX l2-e Q -..) ~ -rR.. '\J (-\ '\ j c.. V\t. E. 0 f L I q , S i ;... V\ 'r"\' , :)00 l - J ex Wov 1 c:t (LeQ-..>~1f"L ""eo.6C( V\e..~ cf 2. ~~ 4 ~ctti,o~"\ of . ~ " '. p()\c~, '0'/\ 0'0\1') *-.. . ... ';u -\-vr't C{ild ~ add {hC1YlO-I 2 f 1-07 jo.hteOorJ-i'oh of fo rch (Staff will complete this item) U r Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepar~d by ii regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings, and streets. The distance from the house and all oth~r buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will'beneeded. if in question. Also, the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. - If the survey. is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: ~. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ ....Cf;J. (j() representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ~S(Jl)C'- tn. "pj7~~ Sign~ture of Applicant ' UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOTTAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. Ifon a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning. Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Print Name Comment ~CA.<;Of\ ~ L()rY\~ \~ ff\2<J95c Signature ~~dress 13J-$ ~f\l'f t)~. Print Name_Re i "V"lQ c\- E\j~ i'/ f"\ . ~K {Y\ Ef\ Comment - Sign~ure~J~ Print Name E R.; ~ c:t ?'A -\-+\' A<;Idress \ ~-:;Ll ~)l)J \Jr. lo..r$of'\ Comment Address \~\~ MarY\~V$-l .^~e ~" Signature PrintName-BRev"\-t q. \SCOO\(~ \$~hr) Comment Signatur~-P~____ Address 13eJo~4 2>rt~.{ . :::;::e~~~~tjt Signature .rtt.~t/ijj~ress\ -S~S Mli'Y )a~l Me. ~ \2-0 be ['1- R U tSl)V\ 'I t Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address . Print Name Comment . Signature Address ~ --. . --, _$"T~lJ17?h . I Remodeling Advantage! FRONT PORCH / ADDITION Joe and Sue Forster 1316 Kelly Dr. Golden Valley, MN 55427 763-544-7372 Designed By: Mike Stewart Date; 7/16/01 Revised: Scale: \-'4" = l' Stewart Remodeling Advantage! 8014 Olson Memorial Hwy, #140, Golden Valley, MN 55427 763-497-8582 Office 763-497.8592 Fax Mn Lie. #5204 Member NARl -j I II 'j -" ! -1:- /i-'-L I :.;. I i.. -I' '___._..j__ ,~ -- I -----r i ! --'=t3. ------ L-_____ i I ~___ --J_ I .--J------! _.~_ , I!I '>.I==f /! --, -01 'i i'.___.____, d .~ - > ___ I ~~ Citj of . old:e.Qw.cigourn~!l~y 9-7-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals Valley Road MN 55427c4588 1316 Kelly Drive Joe and Sue Forster (fax) Joe and Sue Forster, with property located 1316 Kelly Drive, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for an additional variance request from the request on August 28th. This is a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to build a room addition onto the existing home. This construction project requires a variance from the following section of City Code. Council · Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side. lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 2.2 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 12.8 feet on the at its closest point to the north side property line for the proposed room addition. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, September 25, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any Zoning questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. MN 55426-1364 (fax) (TDD) . 6573 Glenwood Avenue 01-9-40 . Michael and Judith Stenwick . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 6573.Glenwood Avenue (Map 17) (01-9-40) Michael and Judith Stenwick, Applicants Date: September 19, 2001 Michael and Judith Stenwick, with property located at 6573 Glenwood Avenue, are requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to build a porch onto the existing home. Previously, this property was denied a variance request. In April of 1971, a variance was denied for this property for a proposed home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant was denied a variance for the proposed home to be located 20 feet to the front yard property line along Glenwood Avenue, instead of the required 35 feet. This porch requires the following variance from building setback requirements: . The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or .structureand the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 7.9 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 7.1 feet at it closest point to the side yard property line for the proposed porch. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in December of 1971 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 6573 Glenwood ~venue Michael and Judith Stenwick, ApplIcants . ,;;- () ~~ . o ~~ <::l .S:! .~ () .~ s !O~ ~~ ... In N '.:! 1'1) 77.0 r-; :N r. ...., OQ .... . ~" ,.- .0 I' /53.J". . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number 01- q -tfo Date Received q /41 OJ Amount Received SO. 00 ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: /05 ?,~ G Jenh'QQd iIl't<rHte ;htJ Ideft~llep H tJ BZA Petition Date Sept- ..:2 S ~ GO (~ I Petitioner: MichaeJ OJ'\~ 0udi+h &"Wi2K Name lofSrJ 3 Gle()wood. MertU~ Address City/State/Zip '1 ~ 9> - ~"'>8 t-8llo 1- Wu&'lA) " (0 3 -~9f4.. -qOqio Business Phone . J Home Phone 2. 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this. petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: OWY\FrS 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (foundon survey): Lo+ I l3 \0 ck J ),J a neJ \e. ~d.~h H Cnl\.. f:kr\Ylep'lnCQUory }t1N 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: ~ingle Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office .. Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. u.=cv( 't\(::,((l'::' r"t :2.... ..t. e i~;" ~,r\_,_ (-< ':\ i\./ i \:).>iL e c",,-- h cU \ i 8. (Staff will complete this item) (t ~'$-y't-'e,. \ \ ~1A;;p,,-.hJ it I) C"'lt~ Ui'", . Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- teredland surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines, buildings. and streets. . The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property,lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11"x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ .~l) . v,\> . representing ,the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ,.' /: /~;:'~;,~y.".< .' 'l/~;-:"~;( ..:', f)tJ i,U-,~f') ,it .('f;(;~-tLLII...i~l?/ Srgnature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need ta .obtain the signatures .of all adjacent property .owners. This includes all praperties abutting the applicant's praperty and directly acrass the street. If an a corner, this means acrass bath streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petitian is applicatian far waiver .of Ordinance(s) .of the CityZaning Cade. Please be aware .of any possible effect the granting .of this waiver cauld have an yaur property. All praperty .owners adjacent ta the subject praperty will receive a natice .of the Baard .of Zaning Appeals hearing, atwhich they may present their views. Yaursignature is required only ta verify that yau have been told abaut the request and gives the adjacent property awneroppartunity ta comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the pr.oject, .objecting t.o the project.or other statements regarding the project.) . Print Name ktlitR. Chc<V"'JeswC)rffi -~; kr Comment \1t0~ ~r~ -tf^ .eM Q~#A ~ ~~~ Signature (<)~CD~~~Address ~/O G20_-f,\ukx07tJ. Print Name Comment fiJo ~ flJ-Lv6 ~ !Jr tu' II Ik a1~A' (A.'~, " (fd~ ?/J . ;L~ {) ~ vrtYJ1') ~'" tL. Cc (.\-0'''- ., J ~?~~Address Dp-?1all .~.Jp-f{;,-- / .' ~/tJ M'~ h t?"f;!1 , " lhN2 f/ S;':-GLE: fL I lUJ fJ/vl;t/,L';'- In :=.. U, () t<.<l cd- 'I \ afIJ2.. ~ . Print Name R,cAo..V'D 111, S"E6U~ Camment Signature Address 6633 ~dvl! Ulo.e ~ Print Name Comment cW f-Kqv/ Signature \ "?'J +\fW\f~'IVtA)fit )V Signature ~\ . c:& . .oy/ .' /'1::> ,':c- /g.t~P~. . -- 1/ I Address a & /) {) c;"'4"lf !Uoo/lv-<.... . Signatu~ . ;rdtUt c-~ AddresslOS-crr- (.->~0~ ik"L Print Name Comment /)/fJ us, f3~ ,flVt{ .feel r () 1771',7 r 1a hie aN,;';/!' d 6 Y) 'f Pr}'l}, ~ VI Signature Address 8i,lJ~rr<..tJv.e4 Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . . ~J ). '\. ()' \J 0-.1 I " ~! " ~I . ~ ". .\ ~ I ~ ! \)i.. . , '~~~:.:=,.'~~'~: .~. IJ 16 E.' ....5~tH..,ST~,~0?;;U... ........:\. 3.;~i~i;;f' C.rtiftcat. ~ '~'~~...~ b~' :<r~ 0 . . ..U 0'.;- c. '-, <>___?..., "0 " " <"? . -'" , " ~ f,;:. '..... ... <'.;;. ...-;Y' -i7 o:;y'- / "" '-., '5cale: /,,=a. o Derlj Ie s Ir,1V! ~ -=.E/.iS-lt'r 1 Z3).~ .I, 13.!1 . ./S :; '5 :;.;'-j r-r: 7? j ..... -z..... 0' --;1 1,.-- ~ I' '. ".-""''''- (' , .-.....>~ -4" ""'" ',.........- .../'. .',..> 'l'........~ ", '-'''l ."......., "" I -"'. -"" ~::-.;'-....< ;:q: V ~s... ~""- ..... <:'::'f~"" .:7 """. . 7'~ ,.~~ IJ "'-- I . , fl.. . .'...., ~'" "'-'"", \ \ \ ~I i\; " i ~ I Lot 1 Bloek 1, Janelle Ac:tdi t1on. Honn<~ p1. n (.; 0' m t:r , };~~nnotl otk. As surveyed by rae 16th AY OF_ Apr:11._A.o. THIS_ . _0 1071 A /;.,>/. /,/ . // _.,OJ ..---/ / Board of Zoning Appeals April 13, 1971 page J . "(1-1-5 - 654l,~~W~,~~~ve. 1"18:0 17 ResidentJ.al 'frJ.s,,st, Sub~ Bld.!'s.. Ear'lWilBDn VJ~""''4iwo.~~~~__~,~~~~_ The petition is for the wa~ver of. Section 3.. 07 (1.) foT' 15 ~ off .the reo;u.:tred 35 I of 20' from the Nor'U1 sethac:k t.aa setback line to the proposed !4r. \'\fij~son l:f8,g p:resen.t tom~~kathe requi;;f3t for th.e lfJft2'1.rf3l:.,!:t fie t.hat in his opinion the best 1:1.3e :fol" the subject lot to a.ce facing Fh:'lv<1pshirE:{ ItvE: '" The an.gle of th.e lot. a.long Glem\1C1od hCHt.reiter malrE, t.h:1.8 difficult 'td....iih01Xl:. SOm.e Va.!'lallCe in the sotbaGks off G15m;,.o:)d.~ or i;,lH3 's,:;uth perty line, or a cOTIloination of on the south property' lin;).. i"h-. 1-'J'il S;)E feasible for him to build a house of :U had to fac~e Glemmod Ave. an.tl not th. t,h..9 neigI1bor~hoQ(1_; 1'11e board then eXal'i'iined the survey of the lot. It '("Ifll:> detl,,,rnlined that, thf;;I"S is ample romn for t.he c:oU1:2rtruct.ion of H hOUSE.! Tlir:l.th,Tt,1.t. 2. i~l setbacks. :Ch.e board. llrld6I~irtood llr1r"# F s -r.;rish to fc.~.cG a. 11011se towa:r"d~ I{a:u!J5htr~€~--P~'te~- ~ but t,hey could not. find a hm....ship for 'l:u.~\~ justification of a l'i'a.iyer em 'I;,be subject lot~ Mr~ lrJ:tlson liJ'as a.sked if 11.9 'Nf0111d li~,:f:!. .cr> 1'l8ve t.llin l1et:Ltio11 11eld OVE";l~ L1nt:tl the next, meeting so that he could recolJ.sider his prcpoBal, bu:t h.e expressed his tfish for a. dec:l.sion at the preS6J.rt n:\!3sting. . It ua.s Inoved by Anderso);1, SE,,(:;c'nded tb.e p(;titiof:t as. 1~~qu~est6d..' leo st,. , C8,1er~iad l1J.1.aALL.Tilousl~y todenj;" There being no further business duly seconded, 2djuurned at 9;30 P.M. c::ome bel'ore 'theYIi.eeting, it tiias on mot,ion, ~-""O-~=...~"}1?;:~~'::l;'*:::~...~,m;'....=m:_"""':.~ L'!cllJ..!..Ol1 .../riil6l.U,18.1.. 13, 1.,1U.l1..,d,.Cl.11 . . . . . . . \. \._' r \ ;~~:..- (._ ' ;~ t/"~ ~t- ft ( i"\ (:\ j\S '"~.(.,.' (' ~\--\:: (-} ,j\ ". '", \. \, \ t t\'C ,~. ,.1 ( 't 1~ c.....'" , C..\ E f\d :2. f J.\ ,-'"") 1 i\ I r' i \ (it ',,/< "'l ~' J,\ 1:1 l L,.' )c !" ".J U' c (-"'~-., \- r I i'-mp'e: \.. r\. 3' 'c.. \.i'.J C '~i. (0 -) '~)"Z{t ;~>~J-Y---\ n.. -.' -v- -. \_) r"-'" ....., i" ~vl :.:'\ \ l . '" (...., + . . . , r Old'~dgo:~[t~,y Road 55427"4588 Zoning Parkway MN 55426"1364 (fax) (TDD) 9-6-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 6573 Glenwood Avenue Michael and Judith Stenwick, Applicants Michael and JUdithStenwick, with property located at 6573 Glenwood Avenue, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to build a porch onto the side of the existing home. This proposed porch requires a variance from building setback requirements: . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 7.9 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 7.1 feet at it closest point to the side yard property line for the proposed porch. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, September 25, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . 1601 Gettysburg Avenue North . 01-9-41 Val Levey . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax} To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 1601 Gettysburg Avenue North (Map 20) (01-9-41) Val Levey, Applicant Date: September 19, 2001 Val Levey, with property located at 1601 Gettysburg Avenue North, is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a room addition onto the existing home. This room addition requires a variance from the building setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, it was discovered that the detached garage does not meet building setback requirements. . Previously, this property received a variance. In December of 1961, a variance was approved for this property for a proposed home. The minutes from that meeting are attached for your review. At that time, the applicant received a variance for the proposed home to be located 22 feet to the front yard property line along Olympia Street, instead of the required 35 feet. This room addition and existing garage require the following variances from building setback requirements: . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the room addition shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line along Olympia Street. The variance requested is for 24.24 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 10.76 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Olympia Street for the proposed room addition. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the detached garage shall be located at least 5 feet from a property line. The variance requested is for 0.84 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 4.16 feet for the detached garage at its closet pointto the north side yard property line. . The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in December of 1961 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 1601 GettysburgAve N Val Levey, Applicant . ::: f :lI9'., , ... 6.' 2'~ """;';:Sl~~VA- ~~ 7 . ~, ~[~...."-.". - - 1 ~I,,~ "'." , ,,,., :~'~~,~~.....~. '~~, . -1J.1-.[_:::' ''__~6. "-, '.-_1.141___.' :J: z I 2 IBe. 7 · . ~ ~ tt., . ,;;;( -- ~Iii - "" 8 ~ .' III - _ . . II , 1-...1 !:: ,,'.Ot . /Jr.l' ... ~.,u~.,.<;~ ~__iU~_ __'!..L..J.__ ---~'--.dI __LI'f'___ ~ ~: ~ I~!,' , ",~,. .tr-i" f' ~ Al7 .:- ~ ,.~. '.': 2.'4 1 ~l' t.,6 .: I ~ ~ ~ r - '.' '9 . ' ..,.,:: ~ - SJ.("'-..Ji . r, 1 .. TSC ~. <4.1 ss sssf:rr '0 ," .. '" _ . Go 'I 16., ~ s. ._ . { . . \". ';. , "'L'~..I11U I>I.U' "j. , , I ,''': 'I "~. 't .~. , , , :,~ ,-.;;~ "'0' 1:;15" '0..", ~15~I4.?rl3~IZ511~IO~ ;13~ 12 "."IO"9"8"?'"'I~"~ o ~ .~'IU ISI.66 ~ M ,'~4 ., /" !.,' : '4 ! '!H .~. ,:.),:.. '" .;j ~ ~ ;:' ~ I ~ I~!' '{".~...:~ :.. 9300" NAPER'L a ST. ". .1\. '11 <; I 9 13.~ ' 12:.\~~ ~ "I<,.. "'C'l;'" "Il!" ",.7 _ ;1' Il>". 1:! $: IUI ~... r ~ .. I.<~-;</o~- !!!::..zo .~ ;~~I~:~ :.2 if:; I.::;' ;."ZO ~.:: I.~~r- __ .. ", ~ "...." 9 "". ...,..... "H".." ... ",04.. In04 ~ · ,~ · ..:j: h.,~.., ,:::" !.."~ \ , :..., il ,. :_" ~_._~ -;' "167'~~ t,'.!~&Oi'. .~~,,' '..3,...... So , ~~8" . ~~. ~ ,. I ~ " ";.,~ ~ .. .. I. -, . "..., - . -.!J!.~ ' ... . "'." "1.'-" " -[; 'i: IILU . "'" .l\l ~ - - - III ' :.. ~. ~I .,. ! r ~.~ ~;~.. ;; "~,,,.,~~ ~. ~.~7.. IJ~"':!!" I~r, ..' ~':!!.~1'!it ~'- '. I~~.II ' , .,in.'~ ~ SD-_ ': I 'It 14..:. ..~..., ~I~' .16 '.. 5.~. ~ '. 16 '5.~, ~~a 16. II . .;:; ~ .J !l ."'" - - -- _" .. - 11':'4 "1.>4 - ~ ,., U "J<<4-." r'lL' IlU' m.II!!! ~f-: ~~." 4.,~!'.'5. 6.~. ~..15 . .'6 .....!!!(~15,. 6.~.~, " .;~" /JUf - ~ I''''f' 11<." ~ - IJ." ,,~,. 1i! ':!!(- ,""""IIU. "z. YO-' ( :1J~,~i ir .~,~.~. ~ . ~..cI4;. ~ ~ 1?c~.tJ~' ~. .,:~.. i J' 1".' ~ ~(!::::;.; '. A!. ';. . ..r .~ ." -----1 . l' ,. ~I Ci)1 ~.~{" '. 6.'~l..L3 ~ 8.~' t.13 ,.~ '_.~ .13. . ,'V8."~ - l ILlI - "'1" .... I' LJ ..... _11 UJ IIZ." ,.'....- ! . ~J IQ.. 7,~' h, .,Z .~.~. ~ .~.IZ , ~ '~IZ. " 9.,~ \fj C) ,...... lOt" ,. is !!! "." IJ>.II - .... ~ 'I~" _ lJVle _ ' "'." ....., -- I ' ~ '. .. ['~~r9 '" ;; .~., t~ ;;.11 ..;; .10 ~;; ;0 II'... ~ 10 ."s.':!!;;. II ;; ,"lo'1~....C; j" ~ ',' ;., .. - m. ,., 0 ,,<, 'I.", S. '<.' JZ.<T "'.sd _. , '<f . ,::-~II. 9450 " "'. J-MPI^ ....IUU.22OO'S,. __ _~' "'....1 ~ 1':. . ~ 94"D5 ......,- n . T. 914$ ...- 01 t\i r: r e. f "';l. 111.01,.. 5' ~ 1~4I.'7:l 141.01" So to 141.07..' 141..1::i s.~ :::."1.17 r"~7\, ~,. ~ ~~ ~-k ~.,,18~ '",.Z;; ~ .~! 5 1'41.ot I;l ~ _~l4!r_~: "41..Z:: ~ ~ 18"8.51 I \..L.:: .; './7131..., Z.~ - '7 -2--- ,17 2 ,7 ,"8i'~~1 ; - /J.., "H'" ' '40." . _ ~'1 _ _l~"L __'4<>'''.. ~. . !Jt4L ..u,.' ':!! . ~ "II 161 3 .... . . ~! WI 'l.~ · --, '. .. ' , 1;l16 ,3 . 16, 3. 16, 3 . '::: I.'''''' ,,,,.t W - ,...... l~'l_ _ ..J4P-,t ''''''z "i4Z "'4'- :~ .r:~"~. ,.~~~,~. 15 .~ 4-"':; ~-I.ll 4. 1~S7.'~!..'5 ,r 4.,fi/ ~~;j ~._. :1- ;~~. ~ '~-'~~:I.;:t;'1:: , ' - 'tJt: Il.~ '::_ -.; 'l;tij '",u; "II. ...':~.. ~ ;;-; i",....,.. I'L': z ~ 14... iljJ#5Jn-~""_~~I...:,B~I;!I.I. "I....... Z~I ~ .13, 6.i1!'~'~13. 6. 13, 6..~':!!..: , 6.~'< J. HL7C .",,- W '...... _..J~7.f~", __IPJ~ 140.7S _~ -';;'1 I...."~ ~ ~ ~~ · .J?, 7.... 'z 0 '~I? ~ .0 7 ~" IZ 'I 7 , _, .,~ 1~~~ +l 7 . . ~ C r.., C l. "" _'l'hr::g. 'I4o.J ~l49:t, --I4J!.'L_~._14.!'t_. _ I<IZt~;7 18" , :ill, ~I!j 11. , 8 ~~i '. II , 8 ....~) 1/ " 8 , ",.11 ,. . 8 . ,I!:I .- -' .'... "u< _11~15 ., .':....(5 ,.(~" ., _ J4#.~_J" _'~'.-'L ~ Ill" l1il'!!! ;;; I ~ "'O,~ 9.~~h.10':: 9.1... ~ 10 ~: 9 ~ g~. 10 ~ 9.'iiilZ '. ,~g9_ .t.': ...!!!~;; 14..,'" '40.< "'!! :: ,~.,::' 4d'" !! :::.";u. 5 . '->8.1 :;!!!.. ~ ,~~ ..... . W'NSDALE -~ T. Vdt:'4.".7IAu~ ,...... .". ~ l. ''.. .'587.'4'35'[940' S . ,....., . _ ~;; .., .; !tr"'7'~'''i I31'S.., .. ~.. .14:-J4 ~ /40-S4!!l ~ '" ,,,-.S4.. '4<>~S4;"~ <:) .. .:",.~ ..ll'04._ .. ~ ii: '- ~,'\~. ,,~<' ~ -;;. ,;:". '" 1 '" 0 ;: ~ :;,~~;:; ,l.'~'" 0: ::; ~ ~,~~:;; .1..':' ~ 0..; :- r-:ie..--- - -'~!e~ 0: - " .. ;:)... J.. ,.... ~~~~i6~ I~A~~n::.'~4' ~ .L:~~~~21.~ z.~~m~~'J ~ 2.~~1 ~ '.. I,-~-......~'" .. . 4 ,g) I...... " -"")eo ..~ "'.4<;;: "7."" : Li5 ~~O I~L'.' ~~, ..z0 3 .'lW' ~ 20.' 3.~' 1-, ~~O, 3., ~ ! '-'---p ,='" I - I""" "'~4 'oJ -;4;4" ,....~ I- _ ,i:;:. ';;"'_, I 'i!';'o 4. is l:l ..I<;::;:..'.a UJ ll~ :: L~~__ "J.. ,.. .;~~ ~ ~'~,'1t!,,14. I~.U ,r ,,~ ,,!.,!,, :...} , <:) , ~ 1;~'4 i. I~'.' ~ L I 13 . r' ' 5.. l\l . ''Y,' '" 5 .. ~ : . . 18, 5. ,1:t1 ~, . 18 5.::: I '! ~ " i-I;::~ _J;',j 1 ,'!I ot i~'ir.. ,:.:..z~ ,,- E -IW~~'.... ~'~o.;. 11f.! -., -';!.17' T"S"'; ': ~ ~ ~/l . r---- ~ -.!'_o.Pf,' .,~. .11:1 ~~Z4 '!I ~..U '..~ S., !' · ~ i I <! . · ~ ':: - .!~~ 14 Ilh.lf:.... .. "!-74 /17.14' '12 [ .; !:\ ~--~_L~ ~1{1"'':'!I ~. .'lolI ' I~_".' 0; ii' .16 .' 7.0 ~ _ .16., 7 ,~~ il j ~ '" ,~"> "'." '''oJ' -, IH(I I'." I~ So 'I,; i I II) "\"~L:l::\~' ~}4:/;,1"..gg'.L~ 8, ~.. III ,8 ___"\~ ~ I----;i .' ':54 1 .. D" _ J"-~!J. .. - I.;.U I'''Z.,.. ; ~-b';~ ~~":I';i.. .. "_4_.9 ~. . ~ ~. 14. ,9 .~.. ,./i4J14.~.: 9 ~ ~~.1 ~. ~~ "> ' 140.01 "... - 14 01 , ill . ,,,. I '" ~ :",.. - ~ .., e - - ... _ _ = "llJ.J7.l..' UHl II /:! ... ; ..~ ~;:::; . ~'..~". · 13 10. ... - , 13. 070.11,. '3 ' '10. __ ~ ~ ~ ',.. f- ~...- - ,ort" I"->..t '44'" 'h,.z 'i> ' . J ... '- \: I L .~il ~:.",~ ---""'!I", , ~.-I!.!h...<> -".(:~,t-f J11.,5t ~:" ,. L', '(liP ^f. I, '!I,. 12 ': II ; '" ~. I? ~ .:: "> <>, 87.-t:Jie. _ ___ ~ .. \ ")'I'''~''' fi----- . (I ';:," 3'.97 01 ';.:" .t 5." ~ ,i...,,~ :~IO 11.7- ~ l.~ ~ ,,~~ ~ "~ S "" .>'I.~~ ."i S/l604"'4X-. .~..;' . ." .41..::;'< Inl/ ":~..i_:"., PL~_" -A"r__ _ _. ,....""9.10-22 I!' "'7~1 ~~,-~..~... "'Yoo;, _ ~_ _. _. . I~ iH- .~ '.. " ~ ~.. . ~A Industrial . Other . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number !} /-- 7 - 'I- I .. Date Received q 1'1/0/ Amount Received ~ o..OD ($50 residential-$150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: /101 C;e.I?A5.bo~ Lf!p/ e 4" 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: f/Jr./ Name .',..' '/!. C!) / Address Lel/e,/ J""Y G'::;1o./c.le -t.,.I t1P'4":A V /j ,I :-/?/ ' /"i/.' ~/'1/ ...~7-~""t'? City/State/Zip Business. Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: .,........_~~....,~."_._---_.,,-..._._~ 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Le> f' ../C) If-./:fe c5,t<;..,-~h /.-::; ~,f /c~7'.... .l?/6C~ )), t? ~ ffI7"€ l-,f I 'eLJ ,c;-~k-' ~ .6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: X Single Family Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office 7. Detailed description of building (S), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. /~;;) . - c.; (#7- ,?-r-;',? '~e5' )___:t;.~-_: ',/Ji ~) 1-0 (;;:' :;Ii+: "" "'::::? ~6>-'7cA.., ~4e .. /Z(''1L'~.f-l 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- teredland surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey.must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this apPlica~ are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ /50 , { representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. e .' lu~/.n YCt~~ Si I ature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . . . . The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. Ifon a corner, this means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application" for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effectthe granting of this waiver could have on your property. AU property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the, project.) Print Name rn 6 {Y;fJ-T'-/ . .r Comment Address {{ZOO O!\I!11iP.l8, ,I Comment Signature -1 Y\<1iJ(\ , , J . .-, "JSJ..f~~t~. Address I ~()~I ---------- /' __/I-;' . i','~ ,J 1 . . " L~""",r;,tfl~ ;.. i; ~.,/ Print Name \.Tit c (;~ ,b .& e..<e.ll e Comment ''/ Signature (/ J~ ",P'" , t:~'/ 1'<'0-1-+<<> 1.. /1-. I, ";'L\.J: CA<jW' (/--f (J, J t i \- ' /< J' / L . "i'" ,". ;" ..'c '. ("1'1. '5- v U i. ( , " ." ,::r ! /~., 1 .-2. r4" " f/. b~' !I.--~_-" Address I toD t-f ;~ "", , Print Name Comment '''''''~'. ./ ' (, I\; " t}, . I . ~.., I < ") /-. ~ . ,1-. .,.-' ""........, ., .'.( i -'(! L 1\ ,-) <\ \.....<. , -.;..' ..~, ~ 1 > .,,"- . ~. ,," /;'" Signature: '1.c.~", }>;(I!'~h"",: "'~ Address iV' . , L,.i '....;v '. \-'\,..--" Print Name :.::re Vi-If 4- /'-7 1>"1 / , Comment f7~' Signature... .\0...~ {7 / . . Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment: Signature Print Name Comment Signature L. e"~ c:.. h ~ ;eI If:. t- Address ./~!o 0 ('r~tLtIAIxIC( .1i/{!1i.! ..... '.oJ Address Address Address Address Address . . . . VAL & CINDY LEVEY 1601 GETTYSBURG AVE. N. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN55427 July 24, 2001 City of Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 7 80.0 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 To Whom It Hay Concern: lam writing to express our desperate need for approval to enlarge our master bedroom and add a ~ master bathroom. We currently occupy our SE corner bedroom, which is barely able to accommodate our queen size bed and a dresser. Even this leaves us little room to move around, and the closet is so tiny it can't hold the cloths fOD two people. By adding only twelve feet to the south side of the house we can create an average. size comfortable master bedroom. We can back up a new ~ bath to the current bath common wall, which sits directly over the waste and vent access. By expanding to the south vle require very little excavation, minimal foundation, only six trusses, and standard 2x6 framing, all of which keeps the project simple and financially feasible. Even tnough this addition may leave us a bit "overbuilt" for our neighborhood, we love our neighbors and Golden Valley, and feel the investment is worth it by allowing us to remain where we are. We also feel this might very w~ll encourage others to follow suit, which can only enhance the entire area and generate additional value and taxes for the city. We request your earliest possible approval s:: that we car' 'in the project ASAP. Sincerely, Val & Cindy Levey . . CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY For: Val Levey 12 r --- ~.'~ - ---- .- -- -, I + I \~~: + NORTH LINE OF SOUTH 1/2 Fl~GSTONE J'L " jf25,O ~ I II ' O I : i p I~ IW o Ii I=> "', ,10 i,l ,2 ~ (J)li IUJ ~~, 0; I> --~ - LO, I,. ~ <( . II "i-1;25 0 Ii I (!) J I, 0:: ' J'~' j, ,'!:!! I=> - - _. -.-~.= .1 135.00 S86051'38"E ~ - . / I ffi =.~..~. _.... ~- - -,-..-.._=.~-='=.~,._-~~'=-~~.=-".=.-.=.._=~=--==~-=.. ! ~ o 0 i g g I J 1 l~ ------. "., - .~~..- -'" --------.. . ~ - --~--..! (!) OLYMPIA STREET ...... '0 a" o o (J) o LO \ G\ \.. "r' \,-) 22. 76~ GRAVEL SURFACE D EXISTING BUILDING 3cale: 1"=30' Page 2 of 2 James R. Hill, Inc. . N ~ o 1;: r:i .., ~ <:> '" o ... o to . CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY For: __ Val Levey PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 10. & the South 1/2 of Lot 9 Block 11, LAKEVIEW ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota We hereby certify that this is a true and correct survey of the above described property and that it was performed by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. That this survey does not purport to show all improvements, easements or encroachments, to the property except as shown thereon. ' Signed this 5 t h doy of June ~~~~~ By; Horold C. Peterson, Minnesoto L.S. No. 12294 Notes: 8 Denotes set iron monument . Denotes fOund iron monument @ Cotch Basin Bearings are on assumed datum Scale: 1'=30' i:J )> -oN GJ ",0 rrl t:5 2 b' ~ _ ~ ~ (.oJ 0 o 0 --10 ~ ." v" a :E. r,; .GJ N "'1m I 0 "', '" ';;0 0<:..." (J)_)>c...~ o,;;1S:::Z 20 OJ Vl ~ -< ~ James R. Hill, Inc. .', . PLANNERS! E, N, GIN EERS / SURVEYORS . 2500 W. ClY. Ro. 42, StIlE 120, IlUlNS\tlE, UN 55337 PHONE: (952)890-6044 FAX: (952)890-6244 . . . glU,=H" f\1,s6ting of thE~ Golde;l1 Van.:sy Piamrinfj Cornmisslern, De,cQ ll~., 1961 The ;:'"'ni rag and Orai nance COfmn.ittees at thei r j oi nt meeti ilg felt t'i,,~i~ the oermittedusG:s in any area should be c:ontr~'-ed by 20!1"ing. Th1S arrangement has ~-Jorked\'Jetifor the .; ,iage in the pastE'll. anwnding the Zoning Ordinance to at .OV! spec'is} uses,. not pre$en~.v al1o\Pif:d~ ina category t%Ld ~ undesirable and sho "0 be discouraged. ~~1 r ., Th.z Zoning COlT~ITrittee; VJ'ltn liiBf'iJber lync ck:n i a i of th i s reques t ..II rlf:;C<Xi'I.11ends Iph~ri0'8C.I~' ViP DAA~ Mp~~~~~r .....,_....,.~....,,~.y ..,....1).. .e-\'f-'_~,?' i.u ~'.\~~~P"'.l;f~fi an:;\:'!~2::n;;d th0. CCmml SS'IOnfS . . Jim Ha~':fks "~Jef'e preri6i1t re~...' ive to the applications., arld Not i (;n by ,}z:n sen 1i seconde 0, Oedv.;re t 1 that' the Pl Commi s S lOfl ,8CC~1pt th<2' t;oornittee r ort and recc.'T\menddenhal of l: 'is applicat'joi1 to the t>,)tmciL riio ;on carried l"dth member Lynch abst~H .ng.. ,~'.. ..' .r:: 1~ .. d . """"1" f b · n.!r"ci'1;::f' rHsCU"-",lon ro" 10i,'JfH:! Hi regar' to tne 'POSSHH Ilty c. r' aen- h'if4 thE" toailow additional uses, ocyi; presentlyaliOit.fedt> in the Yndustr",H Zone. it was agreed that no action t'\lSS needed at this t'ime Q~ni.NANCE' WAIVERS _'''=~=.z--:::~--.u:r-~'Itr'iI~~'''.... ..' ~O" ~,'"".,. ~il'''''"' ".!-..".~ ..""',~.. 'I..", &.,,'. "', Hit'., f.'!.~' ~." \1', ;\r! "" j .~, ~~ .'~ _-J...,~~ ,~...'+.~u';!;,;.,,, "'...~u.U;or'....'I."".......\l''iJv'....-ta "-'=1'=-~;,.~,!:~"-,"~""",,h'''''_'...e:o-..n''''<-','.~~..:::o.'''-e:roi...:~I~~'>>&'''U='.~~''''''' ~. ,J~jcob Li ss Ordi nan(:(2; !:';~1rl1rtr1 tte.9 Ch8irli1~n ~J(Bn~;en gave t~1e fol i o\..;i ng repol-t: n t is for t'Jafver ,::if Se,;;~ 3" 1 i Leming Code C3S 'ft. set back) ft. to a 22 ft. ::et bae;..;: from 0 i ympi a St.. rhe 22 'ft... set bad:; \tJ~:JU 1 d ;a 1 ! O\iJ a 26 ii~t. h(j;'i1~ On a 60 ft. corrH~:lr 1 {';'It arKJ \iJOU t d . . -, t .. .. I ' ~. Th'" a E::S l':.f:l[;::d 1 sn trn s set oaCi'C t.::m O! ymt1H:! St 4, '. e ....CiTo1iil ttee t.:i(Jr~~es tlH31t thi'~; :g;<:mld confcwm to otl~l,~t S(~t' backs in this area and ~'l1ould be bt::1St irltt;:;rests 'of; tf:H3 Villa(se: The'Cornrnittee reCCXff(ieneJs ,J 1.H \1'(::.1 Z f' s,ecc'nded by trftan that the P 1 allrri nq GOl"rmi 55 i on acc.ept d_~. -~ "'l"'t -'''l...!l ""A"" ~l - ~" nf' ~.h';~ ~ ",""""t'<"I:l:',.C" ~'u'. 1'1..",," . ~~~~~t,:~~; ....-iei)iL;~... :ttd,J; ~.~;~,j',J:If~r~v~:;.rie~ 0T~~pr~:J'\lGl 'i --dl: (..~i t ,=' r. i,;q'\-_~t..!............, t.. ~. t"li.~ ~~.orl ~Jnan1rnp.:~t~S.fy tf"1ed.... Gcit.~rtcl1 :~ [:c~r~p,or,.C:1t.1 Oti ~ i ~,.". ..... .... i"'~ .'" ,'"' 1 ......~ .f.....!:. . _ __ f fc1'"~ ,."'........ ~,.... _''''~ -. r- .. ~e:-~ Vtry 1~-t~-;()aJSd~!'on \f:....\.....)t&Vt.~ycH~~L.e o ~~~r.1 ~~ ~~~~.~~ -~nAr~~ 'i,.~ to/(.,.:l.) ~st,.,:.l ii. r...,i'Y lj,.,~il..." o. .,,; __to ~~t""""Jt. Ii",,} After much discussion anti ~~~~~ut ~S ~2~ .~ti.}e ~~. C'fnrn ~i t t e:~ :C~ f:~ f- Ii;;?; C~ d~~r~v~~nrq. ..t~~;'i.s 1..1'i;;at.~ Rega;lE,? Meet:l~g i;j)jf 1:he VHlnge CounQ;Utl Dc<<:embe~ l~o 1~61 llage 3". Rf:?9t!,8?r~ f9.ii= Qf:.\.iir.;.~!(?,(') t~a:ive.! co 1601 Ge.~~$bttr~A"t7e" N@l"f;h!l ~~e!.,.""".E.~~':>Y._.",....~,_'--~::::Y.l~,::l!;""-I"'~~~~~~~_ . --"'-~__~_;.~"'I " ~=~c: .:............;'""~ MEoJoe'L~ Erc~~1v ~c~~m~e~dation of Vi@\1:: 11'>1:€'$itieri'!; @( the Plfu'1nirsgCoImRil\;sinno pl'e$ented the the 'Pl2:nninrg Ct111'llIUissionto Oltpi'rOVe thertE!Cjuei;t fer an. (~ec minutes of 1~~14~1961)" o~c1inan~e _t~ai,veI"o MOVED !:IV Te~e5i seemlded bV Se:he:le~ carried to a\,'}pr@ve the requel:iit fox tllfi ordill~1~e waive~ at 1601 Ge~tys~urg Avenue Northt) u~n .te~omn~ndation of the ~lr~ning Cnm~i~$i~n" 11.~ nest rozr O~c:Hn::u;'l~eW'ai'vei"'" 115Dou,re':i.a~ Drive i\lcu:th 4~m~ ~ -~~~~~~~~._~~~ M.r" j !L o~l'O'lJ,,1.10 r,:e~G~li1iel\'ilD..eiQli of ordinM~e ';G(l,iver" 0 Vi~~ ~~e$!de~t of the Planning Oornmi~$ion0 pre$ent the Plf~~ningCom~i~$ion to ~~p~o~e the request! (~ee mi~ute$ ~f 12014=1~61>>o at 6480 . . ~uVED by Plnn ~an se~@nded ~V T~~e~! ~a~~ied to a~p~o~ethe G~d!~~&ee ~t 115 D~~gla~ ~rive No~th~ p~o Coipo~ati mtncl~tio~ @f the ;lan~i~g CGmmi$~L~no ~;S~~!=t~.wi\{~,L . t = 6~3Q".~r~.!..!!~~,.;~r!. ..;J!J~~)Jilp~n1J, TI]~ BuilC!iniZ In5r>>e@t~J: ~,. $l!mt(!!(il a rC€;JlUes.t ffJt: W~\~~ta ~o~levnrd- forVeli, MOVED by Eies sc@,on6ed t'lie~:~i t at: .64~O WaV2fl'ta cle~v the reqlUest for asi~ ~ale$ Company 0 ~ee(u~$t fo~ Si~n P~xmit = 9400 = 6t ~~~:li".;1!.~:turu~~P.l.O.l'i:.~~...'lilWM.:o:.t"~~~t'~ aower T:I!wl!!'Tli$g. Ttj<;!' Bat3.1cHng !1I1spe<Gtoi' J1:!i!',~s,:e.n1;eCl III ~tb Aven~e North for the ~tfflrw Ta "'" g",;aVED by ~laZl~la,gf4"1 $ee;cmded by ie$ carried t . api'Ji'Gwe the request f@Jf: a signpe~~it at 9400= 6tb Ave sue" No li." th fer the 'S't~C': Btdldiing Y.ns{:ie~to~ preserrted l\l. li."equest for El'n~'\i: ~~Ou$e MO~JeZ:$" ~@e~$e = Er~st Ho~se ::;:!B~~~t Lil{;en~e for MC1i1.iD by Jtllefm~g n. self;;C'Hfl.[~ed by Texe$i <r;1ilt:c:ied to nl:ilp!'(l!Ve tb Reque~t for a Eou$e ~bvin~ i~ense fo& ~rnst H@use Y~ver5 effeetive Janu~ y Ie 196~o Di5ii:,:,&"g~ion ~f ~eiG!mimen(\a:Hon (llf 'Pltmr;.in~ Commtirs~i'Zili1 ileg Adding :iStl.l.I.ll:!:'~illtS ~...:e'4."l'5.:~:il~";:.~.r::GJ.""...i!i~~"'an:ll!Z:'::'~~~~""""~::o..~~"&.1~W~~~~~~~..::::=m~~ ..::.t'1:-1;::~==:.l~ ~_!~~C?Jl~'i.. COt:!eg ~!b: <= j'.2 Br:ot;r:u V~..ee P~e$iden'Q; off the Pl~11IljJng CO~fiii$~ignQ p~'e$eiiated t t. l1.'/)tE!i:"lF:fl~::~dCin of th.(;~ Flafl.J?il1g Cml'JSaiS2ion to cie~:l'i1 ~aid ze~(Uie$t. _ /Ji1.l':" l1J,:';I:1~;1t,",$ RiGc;:; l:tf->pc:azea to li:12(JU1est the Zoning CCfdl! be amended by It!.cUiing /' ~&:st"'.~t: ~,n.ts 1m th~ In(iii8tdal Zo~:iil1g CtiH.1e 9 and to :i;l!]gga$t a €:cmm1ttee be rtt;;l5i1t'}ii'ite~l ~;'~;'$t~jdif ~;i1etmfb~teii:' fe.i~~;[:!fe~: ~ . .. . . . . . " oli_~c,goUmg!~~y Council (fax) (fax) Licensing MN 55426-]364 (fax) (TDD) 9-6-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of. Zoning Appeals 1601 Gettysburg Avenue North Val Levey, Applicant Val Levey, with property located at 1601 Gettysburg Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to build a room addition onto the existing home. This room addition requires variances from building setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process, it was discovered that the existing detached garage does not conform to setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the room addition shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line along Olympia Street. The variance requested is for 24.24 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 10.76 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Olympia Street for the proposed room addition. . Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the detached garage shall be located at least 5 feet from a. property line. The variance requested is for 0.84 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 4.16 feet for the detached garage at its closet point to the north side yard property line. This petition will. be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, September 25, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the . Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. . . . 4505 Sunset Ridge 01-9-42 . Deborah Perkins and Rhonda Wiggins . . . . Hey Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 4505 Sunset Ridge (Map 9) (01-9-42) Deborah Perkins and Rhonda Wiggins, Applicants Date: September 19, 2001 Deborah Perkins and Rhonda Wiggins, with property located at 4505 Sunset Ridge, are requesting a variance from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicants have approached the City to replace a deck onto the south side of the existing home. The replacement of this deck requires variances from the City's Zoning Code. The requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. A swimming pool is considered an accessory structure. City Code states that the pool shall be located at least 10 feet from the deck. The property owner is requesting variances for the pool to be located at a distance of 9 foot from the deck. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in April of 1977 for the construction of the house. No other pertinent information was found in the file. Subject Property: 4505 Sunset Ridge Deborah Perkins & Rhonda Wiggins, Applicants . . oq(' ... t ...: c ... ..... ... r ... ::: ~ ~L _ _ ill ~ _ 7 id il I ~.~:...f.!-~' 00. \ I:" '00 ( 00 ~~.,I"! ~rO \" ~-..:~~! - ....;,...:::..::.:=. ............~... '.-.. I I ~ I l .250 ~ ~" WAVZATA eOtJlEVARD ........ Zf . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number I}I- q.-.lf.J- Date Received qlvlo I , , Amount' Received -If ;; 0,. Oil ($50 residential - $150. other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 450$ St.LV1sci R;d~t2- I (;-c,lde" Vwl{ey f>'SLfltp 2. BZA Petition. Date 3. Petitioner: ~J, Name 4sc:s Address C4>ld e," Vcd ( e v fV"v'.l ~'s-Lfl & City/State/Zip '74 ).. 371 ~ 5"")74 Home Phone 1'efKll) '). . R H.o I~ D1\. WI G6iN.5 SL'."\seJ RiJl1 e.. Business Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): Lc+ I ,g\ \< l~/\(f'Vl"'eJ/.s Wr~4- T1 \rd I I-hll~ AotcL4 \ trIA 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: 7J- Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. f?c.pl~'\V\jd cc.,k iN;-f-h sm~d ley c1 ed< +h4L-f woll bt!--c-bscr .J-~\a,V\ 10' '+0 o.y.:ooJ. +er . 4l::>py~ l\~ whe'l'"/ts +k ("ev-fou.sdnJ<, "vas cl"';<W-Ulltf\ ID; fw +J..e- (,,;tf~(~ 32.' cf deck::. 8. (Sfaff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of th~ reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are 110t acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in Question. Also, the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. 4~.~ Signature of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across both streets. . NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance{s) ofthe City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the requestand gives the adjacent property ow~er opportunity tocomment. (Camments can cantainlanguage .of agreeing with the praject, .objecting t.o the project .or ather statements regarding the pl"oject.) Print Name .0{ ~ll\ W feJeVl C'1I) Comment 11'!L prux,' rl'1i'''-f O~~ 1V-e decl-:-- 10 1ku- pr:ol is no! oFQ)f'-Cc::;tV1 <hJ VY'li. .. I&~i~, Address Lf<;IS S'Ctfl~{'? .eJc)C:- , ~ .' G,oldJ2A1 VDllt'.~l. VVlAJ E;$ltlt Print Name .V/c-}Lt UC&ltV.~ . ..comment M-SPe~l& +U ct~~dk r ~ce-rneC0t- .. M- ...{L 'VO-& dv yVLe-v ~ CJ1rttu,C1.~(Jvf,ili t~ s: Signature U Address L-f GOO. S Li ft5-e;t dq ., v Print Name Comment Signatur D CJ CJC:<.G Q t?,-)S,Oh a. \'e-- Address <!<j 1/ x:It~u4 e~&~ v , Address 7/ l!o 0/ Sir /t/ '5 r 1-' /JIc, i rJbl'e/Jtllfl(~ u . CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY For: Ronda Wiggins/Debra Perkins 4505 Sunset Ridge Golden Valley, Mn LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1. Block 16. Kennedy's West Tyrol Hills Addition. . LEGEND: Scale: 1 inch = 40 feet Bearings shown are asswned datum ,. Denbtes Iron Monwnent Found [ 2 ] o DenoteS Iron Monwnent Set [ 2 ] (Capped byR.L.S. No. 10948) Note: Distances as shown are in feet, hundredths & tenths ofa foot. /\ o \; 'V J' " (- ,<r r;-" 0'O~ ,~ ~ '" . '-Q ~ 'b-::t " "" 'Q<J". f" 'l'.. * ti-;:!. I __ ..... 1) -- D <::) .'./ DG E ~ /I ,I I . ~ 1\ \) V - )7: . /fwy " J>-"8:,z"" - I I "\ I <;) / \., J No. _ .-1__ \ ~ "1l" <:; ~ I I \ j -3 9-4. ~ - - -.1_ - _--.J' . \ (Sfdk:~fd/T/in9 Wall \...... ("1. Yvy, SOLIn'" 5..1 r-r'e,.) 0/-7,2-22_9,:;__ \ mRVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: hereby ce. that this CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY was prepared by me and that I am a duly Registered Land yor laws of the State of Minnesota. As surveyed by me this 4 ~ day of 2001. !ftd-.~. Surveyor. Mn. Licence No. 10948 . . . 4" We- Wt/Yfj 11-01- CL/lAJtt4e.- +~fovv brA-,.UN httcl nof ,V\clvdeJ -+he-. "PPol "'n +he pl~>'l he, subrn;.Hcd .-k...Hc C'.l'iy, We,bdlC'vcd We.- '\fAd.~ v41iJ rO,.rn;+ tD..ye-p{iftC6 Olly deGk. UroVl $uJ, beLc -fWc -bre.. o~f +he- t're i/lOUS 10' ~ 52,,' d eLk. \Ale. WCvld h k e- -b r( ((Xl $trv cA ~ deeJ ..f-.A~ f rslD' ~ II' ~Yld gen drops l,.,-b ~ Lf''VifCi/Kwti.Y ~ -t-'-' e. Y'C/'y\?1. t,.. in J .2 2-/ ~ Ovv: 1,.0 V 5 e. i 5 C~f't ~ k-v cirJ Wi i-h 3~. G ' 'f'''''}''o d ~or5 ~+ arC $'~rfl't'~l by -U. \ $ d ec..k. We hell ~ \r~ 1+;' S ( '" avv' hesf [I-> .h<E..J ~ Y'c.k>vil d -l-J.<.. dea< ,{;,r}Re.. saCcI,! fbfevcv Ion ~ .. . . . . . . oll~~WdgoWm~JJ~,y 9-7 -01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 5')427-4')88 .763-593-8000 763-593-8109 (fax) 763-593-3968 (TDD) 4505 Sunset Ridge Deborah Perkins and Rhonda Wiggins, Applicants Mayor and Council 763-593-8006 Deborah Perkins and RhondaWiggins, with property located at 4505 Sunset Ridge, have petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Residential zoning district. The applicants are proposing to replace a deck addition onto the rear of the existing home. This construction project requires a vc:;lriance from the following sections of City Code. City Manager 763-593-8002 . Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. A swimming pool is considered an accessory structure. City Code states that the pool shall be located at least 10 feet from the deck. The property owners are requesting a variance for the pool to be located at a distance of 9 feet from the deck. Public Safety - Police: 763-')93-8079 Fire: 763-593-8055 7.-8098 (fax) Public Works 763-593-8030 763-593-3988 (fax) Inspections 763- 593-8090 763.593-3997 (fax) This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, September 25, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. -If you have any questions .or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Motor Vehicle Licensing 763-593-8101 Adjacent properties require notification. Planning and Zoning 763-593-8095 Finance 763-593-8013 Assessing 763-593-8020 Park and Recreation 200 Brookview Parkway Golden Valley, MN 55426-] 364 763-512-2345 763-5] 2-2344 (fax) 7.,-3968 (TDD) .It . 701 Lilac Drive North 01-9-43 . Tennant Company . See Large Size Plans and/or Survey in Planning Department . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 701 Lilac Drive North (Map 12) (01-9-43) Tennant Company, Applicant Date: September 19, 2001 Tennant Company, with property located at 701 Lilac Drive North, is requesting variances from the Industrial zoning code (Section 11.36). The applicant is proposing to construct 2 new parking lots: the first along Zane Avenue North,which does not require variances, and the second in the southeast corner of the site, which does require a variance. Also, during the construction planning process, a Aurvey was submitted for the site and it was discovered that the some of the existing parking lots do ~ot meet setback requirements. Finally, the applicant is applying for a variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces for the site. The following are the requested variances: . The first requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (A) Front Yard Requirements. City Code states that the setback for a parking lot along a street right-of-way shall be 35 feet. The variance request for the proposed parking lot is for 24.6 feet off the required 35 feet toa distance of 10.4 feet at its closet point to the property line along State Highway 100 and for 10 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 25 feet at its closet point to the property line along State Highway 55 (Olson Memorial Highway) for the existing parking lot. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C) (1) Side and Rear Yard Requirements. City Code states that the setback for parking lots adjoining the Residential zoning district shall be 50 feet. The variance request for the existing parking lot is for 15 feet off the required 50 feet to a distance of 35 feet at its closet point to the property line for the properties in the Residential zoning district. . The third requested variance is from Section 11.36, Subd. 6 (C) (2) Side and Rear Yard Requirements. City Code states that the setback for parking lots adjoining the Business and Professional Offices zoning district and the Institutional zoning district shall be 25 feet. The variances requested for the existing parking lot are for 17.5 feet off the required 25 feet to .a distance of 7.5 feet at its closet point to the property at 5738 Olson Memorial Highway (zoned . Business and Professional Offices) and for 17 feet off the required 25 feet to a distance of 8 feet at its closet point to the property ay 5730 Olson Memorial Highway (zoned Institutional) and for 23.6 feet off the required 25 feet to a distance of 1.4 feet at its closest point to the property at 623 Lilac Drive North (zoned Business and Professional Offices). · The fourth requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.36, Subd. 7 (A) (B) and (, Loading and Parking R.equirements. Based on the office square footage of 59,515 square fee , and the warehouse and. manufacturing space square footage of 270,185 the total number of required parking spaces is 778. The site currently provides for 512 spaces. After the construction of the proposed parking lot, which will add 99 parking spaces, the applicant will increase the number of spaces to 611. Therefore, the applicant is applying for a variance to reduce the parking requirement of 778 parking spaces to 611 parking spaces. City Staff recommends approval of th~ variances with the fol/owing condition: · The recommendations of Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal/,.asfound in his memo dated September 10, 2001 become a part of this approval. Hennepin County's property record system states that the building was constructed in 1956. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . . . Subject Property: 701 Lilac Drive North Tennant-Company, Applicant . . A (:~(.~/': ~. c ~~ d 'f>'\'tog ....IO.O;....~. .0 .~.~ ~ ~. " (" l/ 1-' LI'fI,. 1 I I I I 1 I.... ; I~ ~ I. .1 -~ Pt'~_1 JLf'l~! . .. [",." "'I"~.' . . {II ~:~,1..,~. ~ I .._1It. I ~l i ,..,.,,- -I..;.. .~ -:...~ f ,. .. 7$ ';.".~....." ......... J~ ',~. ,?"" \ I ~.;/~~~.~ ",')~l4.~.... .4 .. ~.tf ~ -"4'4 ..../.- ; \ ~~.~~.1/4 eOI .ll~ . ..." ..~.;: · ~(d{,~ · .~ I ,-..... 6. H. Tenn.;nr Co. . No/e: Pis/ance! aM bear/n9.s perfaininJ. to G.1f. Tenndnf Co.ane! atf/lIcenf pllrce!s tire taken from Piifricf Coar! "Memorial PIal CasB No. 13'0'1.'. - ,-~<... t. ) . ~'v'';'~ 0. ai: ;:i" ~;:i :;- ~... "'... o~ :t- ~ ~ ~ ~ -0 ~ ?' JL" ,.,' .1"t M ~\ (\. /....\"-~ <2iqj .. . . ~. , ~ I! ... I , '" ... ~ i!l ,- ;\ ~ ... I .- . 6738-" $730 : :- JLM ~ "4 (FLOV~ e. OLSOr,1 MEMOR'IAl. I I I 1 I I I I ....j.-.. . I; I:> ~ ,.. ~ ({) (Revised 1/99) Petition Number . () 1 "1 - <-t ] Date Received II /-f/fJ I Amount Received .$/5'D. OJ ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER . CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 701 North Lilac Drive 2. BZA Petition Date September 25, .2001 3. Petitioner: John PI ifka for Tennant Company Name 701 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Address City/State/Zip (612) 540-1200 (business) Business Phone Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: Not applicable 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): See attached property boundary survey for property legal descripti n. 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: _Single Family __ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial x Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before orafter the building permit issued. See.attachment. 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons, necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. See attachment. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regi~- tered land surveyor Ii~ensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also, the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant wiUsupply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 10. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ 150. 00 representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. A~,Y~ sj8'n'atut!lOf APPlica7' .... UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST,<IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. -...-.... ...-....... .. -- . -- __..., ~....v.... v~.r~.L\..u. .....,...\,;f.Ll...a.;,.a.;,J,\,.LJ,,\.;I' 19,) UV..:: .' '..- ,. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this means across. both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effectthegranting of this waiver could have on your property. AU property owners adjacent to the sUbject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacef!t property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project) Print Name CL~ GN,~lN~JN,h ~no,J Comment Sign"ture .~ t:.....)'yJ1; ~ Addres$ &z./ Lllk PelVG- No Print Name-.J'] A/v\A.-::Lu S tV A'i Comment ~w~ , :.g' f't;:'D:!Ifl.7" NO C. 0 JOY I Signature ~~ Print.Name CA.~r-^- . ~<"L Comment Address 5730 {j)/,;;r:;Nl'-iff J1 H wi - L~~~s~~/ B",-,tJ "'3 d~ d. .^* rd-~~ IM-'j ec.U.. . Signature Address Print Name Comment Signature Address . . PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Attachment September 4,2001 7. Two. additions are involved in this petition and both are shown on. the attached property boundary survey. The first addition consists ofa 34 stall parking lot (approximately 60-feet by 180-feet) located near the southeast property comer. The second addition consists of a drive lane widening (approximately 6-feet wide.by 300- feet long) to serve a planned tnick turnaround area located near the center of the south property boundary. . 9. A setback waiver is requested for the parking lot proposed near the southeast property comer. Recent growth of the Tennant Company has resulted in the need for additional parking to serve their clients and employees. There are limited areas on the Tennant property that can provide the needed parking to meet long term goals, with the southeast property comer being the most desirable. The recent reconstruction of Lilac Drive has shifted the road to the west and reduced much of the previously available area for parking at this location that was. once within the City setback limits. In addition, existing parking areas near the southeast property boundary currently encroach on the south property boundary setback and the proposed parking lot will not exceed current encroach limits. A setback wavier is also requested for the proposed drive lane. widening serving planned truck turnaround area located near the center of the south property boundary. The. truck turnaround area is necessary to improve the efficiency of shipping and delivery operations at the Tennant Company plant. The current drive lane to the planned truck turnaround is narrow (approximately 24-feet) and is situated directly against current parking areas. Widening the drive lane to 30-feet is needed to improve safety. in this.areaby providing a buffer between parked and moving vehicles (that include tractor-trailers). In addition, the existing drive lane to the planned truck parking area currently encroaches on the south property boundary setbacks. . Memorandum To: Dan Olson, City Planner From: Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal Date: September 10,2001 Re: Plan review comments variance request for 70 1 N Lilac I have reviewed the site plan for the variance request for 701 N.Lilac Drive. Listed below .are my comments for the site. I) Provide "No Parking Fire Lanes" signs on the main East to West driveways. The signs shall be posted on both side of the driveway. The installation shall be in accordance with the City of Qolden Valley Ordinance and in conjunction with Golden Valley Fire Department Installation Standards. 2) The turning radius for the fire apparatus should be 45 foot inside turning radius. 3) Does the existing fire hydrant and valve assembly for the sprinkler system located near the new parking lot does it need to be relocated? If you have any questions, please call me at 763-593-8065 . . . 1 olig~:"goUrn~!(~Y Valley Road MN 55427-4588 (fax) (TDD) Licensing Zoning HEARING NOTICE Board of Zonina Appeals 701 Lilac Drive North Tennant CompanV,Applicant 9-7 -01 Tennant Company, with property located at701 Lilac Drive North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for variances from the I ndustrial zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct two additional parking lots and truck turnaround areas on the property. The construction requires variances from . the parking lot setback requirements of Section 11.36 of the City Code. In addition, City staff will be reviewing existing buildings, parking lots, lot coverage, and the number of parking spaces on the property to verify that they meet current setback requirements. The parking lots are to be constructed in the northwest area (near the railroad tracks) of the property and also in the southeast corner of the property (near 621 North Lilac Drive). The truck turnaroundsare to be located along the southern property line which separates Tennant Companies from several office and institutional land uses. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, September 25, .2001, beginning at 7:00 P .M.in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095. Adjacent properties require notification. .l . 8100 Wynnwood Road 01-9-44 . Craig Halvorson . . . . Hey e 0 Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 8100 Wynnwood Road (Map 19)(01-9-44) Craig Halvorson, Applicant Date: September 19, 2001 Craig Halvorson, with property located at 8100 Wynnwood Road, is requesting variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to replace a porch onto the existing home. This proposed porch requires variances from. building setback requirements. Also, during the construction planning process a survey was submitted for the property and it was discovered that the existing home, garage, and shed do not meet setback requirements. The following are the variances requested: . The first requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variance requested is for 3.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 31.4 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Bies Drive for the existing garage. . The second requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd.7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than 100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 1.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.5 feet at its closest point to the west side property line for the existing home. . The third requested variances are from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setbacks. City Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 24.05 feet from the property line to a structure. The requested variances are for 7.75 feet off the required 24.05 feet to a distance of 16.3. feet for the existing garage at its closest point to the rear yard property line and for 3.25 feet off the required 24.05 feet to a distance of20.8 feet for the proposed porch at its closest point to the rear yard property line. . The fourth requested variance is from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the existing shed shall be located at least 5 feet from a lot line, be at least 10 feet from the home, and be located completely to the rear of the home. The variances requested are for 3.3 feet off the required 5 feet toa distance of 1.7 feet for the existing shed at its closest point to the west side yard property line. Also, the shed is 6 feet from the home instead. of the required 10 feet. Finally, the shed is not located completely to the rear of the home. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in February of 1965 for the construction of the existing house. No other pertinent information was fownd in the file. Subject Property: 8100 Wynnwood Road Craig Halvorson, Applicant , . . o !~.... gl---'.~ 'IG'61' Uo.l ..- Z5nAUes.-_ "P"~ e..t lIS 11 - - _.;~. _ u_,. 14>.4& ...., .. " 82211 "-4', - ...' 81-711 RI311 8101 _:. 8025 fi\'" '0.. ..) "": ~ 6 114.44 ItLl1 ~ =:'1. 'B." \,> '00 .10'" - "\ ..~ . . 14~.~$~i 0 ~.',J ~~ 15.;~..~~t I.~,,~~ , 1 .; . ,..&~ 42 '"~ lto.. If "-'':, -;. ~\""...-,." I~ 4 - .< {;-">: ",.; _ll'J.t"'.; '1. 1# 00 I u.".. ~ ~ · t ~ ~ 0 2;' -. ~"""J'll.", 1l"'2d B'.o~ " ~ "'u"~u.l ~.~ "" 15..1l - !! ;.,;-:; ":;,; .00 ~.. ~ ~,.~ ;;; "IU '!'oJ ~~ ~ Ill,', 'C.. ';14.:0\ ',."'.:,.' ~{.. 1 oil j;.4;....!l ~~o i Ceme}...y i .: . =0 - '';~, ~-'"' , ." " \)"~ '~9, ",/'ft. Zo Ito.A< . '" ... ' - -1 .."" ~ ~2. ~ ,-.- ,~ 'Ason. 9_.' - . >;: ~::1 ;; g~l ~::. .,. ~ "~~' '~~'''''<f', <>Il:.th AVE, ~o:: ~ _ IMD I..... ---;:: _ '0 _ 4!\' 14~.o" ~" _:oj -,...,.... \$. J No', r.r.~ f r!r,~'Jlq".6"". ~ "".WJ}.1f 11'.23 1'15. ,'_ I -. .- - . ~ - 5.".\1....-,;. it'~';' ./~ AI", 111.10 _l~ 2J;'20rzuz 1'l'1.t- L, c.a~ _~f::J 2 ~ilt~+Z~ I.~ --' 0 14 ~ . ~j:~ L ~ ~J ,,\~ ",... --:-~1l-. ~ .. ,!Ii r."" ", ~ I . t~ --;:-- ~--::~."'i~~4~ .'s n.......~~ ~.s.'fo. ~ ell ~ h;'.7 t .t".1#~~2::~-. _ ;r''''';'JS'lt~~~ ~ IOl3 "-, ~ 4IL" .-.e; :::-o~. c;: IZ.'1:~'t 1;. - II~"""" ... 14S.1I lAD .s.1~~' ::i',Zz3- t~!11.-,- ~li ;.. 'I',,~~.l:-.f::,~z'.a ...-?2i..'40 '114- -{:_h_~~ ! .._ ~ .2,14t-~~ ;GRE.GO~Y';SI L:il ~~>..... .~?S '0 ~~;.~ . ij~~"Z ./1 i:o~ ~~ 6 . -"'" ~.;:.. ~. ,Q'i' . .... ~oQ"."'''~ I eo _-~t"4f'..~ JI.~~t\I-.Z -= ....'45.'Z"l14"~-~::~x:.~."7./Zr;:;;l_1t.1!!._I::i- . .. ll~, ,,";. ..,."~. - "..1 - Q: ii. 11\'4~ ".1% ~ ~ ... . ~~.. .:.. ~ "'., "'14.1>,... '.,--&oU. J ;.,.4 0 \. ._ ,. -..;" l\t1 3 ADO TTc;~ .' ~ ~ · . ",'" I "l-"';~ . '-~.3 y . ~ . . ~ ~. 2 - 1..2.:>.: . . 3.4., ;.. l .,.)/"'':' .' ,10': ~ ~'r=-.A'~ \._ -;"01 ~ i,e: 5.; 4.4 'rI . --= ;..~ 1Ir1"" Z7.12 11.11._ . '.io ; 8450 .... ~ '.~:~ III I .. :,.. '" ' ,. 3; ~3T !"~ ,""/1 '" /80.2.3 _ ..'" r::..' ":: o' ~ ~ 1. ~ ~:...:- ~%......;v- I 1_ . I IIC.c' :- - BOZO':;. I.,.." So'~ ,C!"a1D2 ...... -.. ..-:~.. ~ iii... .- _ ---.. "'1~.""'71. .~ Ea ~ ~ \ .' 8.I'A"',.S',w.. Q~&Vl. ...:.... ___ __., . J: -;:! n .e -r ! :"1'" """20 .".",,~ ...1.~. ~ I:"" ~ .,." ;to( ---- ~1-1'.~ ~ .I ~ . . _ ...;. ~ ~ . . f . Ie) ~ ~. 7'.13 . ,So. 74.1". ~ t\f ~ r: .. AVE:~'"'~''':''' I ~ ILl> :Ii m:_ IZI g.4 ;' ,~ ' z 804:)ONELLEN.l LANE~' I$.. t :.-:;. . . ~ "'.S". ~::r_ - .. ,-. ... II> " r:- .:: 'M1Ji 1'.., ~.! ~"""'" :: · 1 "'~ " :~J 1.1. ;-'t:,:~ ~';bI5 8~' / f~. 'M '....i.. 'i'~~ _!!b~; 1~i.~~~l!-~. ~~~' ~ ;;Itl. -, ~~. Sg~i t ~.T"':~~r.; ~.ti~~"'.7;'It "t,"." 'l~\ ~~::::i' 144.4 ....'6:':'t;l .,..~ II' . 10ua",0,0iII lot ..' ~ ~ . ","~ ~b~ IS. .:i" '16." ~,!~q; '" " ~ .:: o~g e1 0 It.o'o1\oO. ~ ;:: J.~,; ~;:...;.., ~'_o_21~_.. .. . ~~ 80208000 -... . _- ~ t\i - -...~ ' J ~ -...,. ;1"--- .-lj1~,,' 7- c ~ 60 5 4::: IOS _ - 2.07.2.3 __ _ \ ~ """ ~1:l. ':::,.... .,-!Jlll V"," !!l ~.~s. - ~" "~'"i N " . N . ~~ '" /OHJ.., '4j --- r..~a~o!t, ~~. ~ ~. ,~~. ~ ~. _::,r- ,.& · '''~ . J ".1' ...~i - ~~ 87.1 J ~:in'w.. '0% "L..... . It... 'j4.''i. . ~ ~ ; ~!~I~\",o~L-"'~.~.-;;..4..:iO{~ If~. '/.to~. WY:'M~n3 ~"~.'jS,#JZ N.'..'4'W~Dr\J;.I.~ .fl....:!'::=1. ~.'i1~.. ",: · '--~:;.{~:- ---- ,'\.\L- 5'~ t.. '<5 8IHw".';;{j,!!J5 ,- 1l.c.D"-'l''''/' oint;! .. .... _ ..., . ~...,:., '70" - . <;-t:. l}o.1or': ~ n .110 'DO.'1 10" ill' ~ jD'.l . .. &;.. 'Z ~ ....J 8045 80/5 · dr" ;:.: It1.11H1J t."-It7 , S!. 4 ~ti~'l':t"':; Cii .~.. S. ~ .\ " N t.,,;~.;; : ~ ~ RP HLj N3 ~~~~.. 2 ~ .~ ~g~: ~~ "U'~, ~r'" - -- ." 2'-~ 11.1'" ~ n~44.4 ~4.4-"""~ . (1.\\ ~ 5 :~;' . ". I..... n,., '\. IH>~" .. '00 ~ -: . a:: '1 .2 '" _ ~ I : :;: ",.::;; ,. m3 r ~! '.. '. ,.. 101-4. ~ '; ~ ''''ON' :~ ~~.S;; '~7:1~A1 , ~ 1 f 8 ~ ~ ~ ,:~~S:-.sf"CO~D4 ~ -;i f-/{O ~ 4 ~ .. no lot ",." ~T, 8200 -. . 5l; "'.. '" .... ..; -UljJ So.to.c.... I)"I!, 8.J4Q. 5..61825~o,08 00 10,) 100 110,1.1 OD.. .100 lib 'nJ#- t -,r.'tIJIO,."., 101 T:or:.. :J (t:3"'~- .Z1s.I'B3";':~;i'~.I11- _S89'14'"j~~8.ZI 6IJlP. 8140 _,/100",,/,_"040 8020 BO(JlJ" "I., s....... 0 Yo: ~ ...). ~ ";.SZ jl"Q - '5,.,. ,J...- "Z"" 10$1 18225 Bo' ~'f~-~r.t. rs':-oI .".: :5tJ.., f,.N.,.W40."jSSS ...1"..,.....;:' :'.i- ._ -~ -- :.-. ~. <> .. iftl '-.i;' "8' '.'01 '_. . _' "'.01 10' ".. '/5" '" ~ 'j.... I. :-2-. . ,~ 't3...... .n't &Pll._a _::. 1'''' r~......; _ 79ZS. It 1'.1"" N ~,;';r1;.41 - ':~. ':a :.~ 1 ~ ~~~I.~ ., re~ ~e 4.~:::3 ~~. 'S . t:_~ . .." f . /\-r.:;..... "4. ~mr "m!' ..,./r,;:... ~;; 1JI -'! "'<0'1 "5..... . w... 'S' _ B 50 I z ~: ' ;';. ~ '\ 9,,\s.!';- .3 .. 'I/~.. ~?r .~?<7' '5 ,.." o. ,,-...... ") ~ ;;;I'f ~N~ '.... _.~ E ~.., - _ . . Industrial . Other . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number (; 1- q - 't '1 Date Received q 1'1 I {) j Amount Received qQ. LA) ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 81 r.' ( tJ (. /' i / V () ~i/v vi t-r w t.' ("? !") c 4. c .. i)~ t, { A~. (-y I ) l/" lie -/ 1'1/1./. :;--5 9- 2 .7 "" . , 2. BZA Petition Date 3. Petitioner: [r-t., <', ld. /le.: f//e.r 50~. Name .... . t, ( I.J C' IF,,1 V';"1 l"{ l.<..? c.' t' ,.f Add ress / 7I-fe~TJ,,,,o- lIZ-.33 ().-tI3l Business Phone it" 0(, ?( {.:.;.. LJe '1 U../le v /'-1 IV5-C;;-j-27 " City/State/Zip 7 t. 3-5-4S--Z- c) :;; I Home Phone 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): , . 7 P I I. /L ! '7 I I I ,Lor .I) /J,ve-l".. 4-/ ,1ie-h ciVJ" I J. / I "-'I (!... .. , , . f _) .F He.I1J1 e. /J.VI , i) .- l.- Q(.( "'fry or, /' fV1 ; u ,"'" p .c: '.. .1- " t' - f ~ -.' ,'"I _,,...7~.~ -, 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: X Single Family Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. J10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota~ The survey mu~t show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed, if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x · 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies.ofthe survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my cheCk in the amount of $ /yO . representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. ;; /) ~UI ~. ,- ....... ~ '. .. ..~e~ Sign 'ure of Applicant UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain the signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this . means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: This, petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) oftheCity Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. 'All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the projector other statements regarding the project.) Print Name :3" l'. fV\ (t~~\ () ~ Comment f\!)C)l/'\(j Signaturen~ .' )J~ ~ 77ZdLPW . ~:::::e Ztn.~;;;1 ti^-0 A Signature Address ~/3S- G~/nhl.-lrtd,. f'L., R.{ Idee {( I Address--21~()(J)/Li{.lGZ I' t ' Print Name Comment 'T~ll jf/vl cy- Y)dV/ f (JIJ flr/tatl Address <(lo.P t~Yt'1HueoI ;te' ~ f :5ll~if~~~ Address &)0~) lV'I/7n t<."lcJO';:;( .I::;{. / Signature Print Name A..arr1 v Lv. "'t Comment Signature I' v . ~::;:: ~ g~T ~~hl A~ I6A-OU( Signature a~6~ ... ~l~_ Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment: Signature . Print Name Comment Signature . t8 1-<. ;etl ..H4.-;7, . [\ Address. -t3 YS-Ji':~-'-~::J AVA't.A.~i' Address Address Address Address Address PROPERTY CORNER FALLs-l~ IN WOOD FENCE POST L> REVISED: September 12, 2001 0\ ] I l$4 301l1l$/2\ L YERSON. CRAIG "SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 10] Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 Fax (952) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: CRAIG HALVERSON SURVEYED: August,2001 DRAFTED: August29,200] to show shed. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, RICHLAND HILLS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of our services does not include detemlining . what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary. to "make sure that it is correct, and that any matters ofrecord. such as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deeme<i important. 3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the comers of the property. 4. While we show proposed improvements to your property, we are not as familiar with your plans as you are nor are we as familiar with the requirements of govemmental agencies as their employees are. We suggest that you review the survey to confirm that the proposals are what you intend and submit the survey to such governmental agencies as may have jurisdiction over your project to gain their approvals if you can. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "e" Denotes 1/2" lD pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, unless otherwise noted. 1 hereby celtify that this plan, specification. report or survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Or. Moo A Jj 6L ~n " ~er P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 GRAPHIC SCALE 2~.~ i ( IN FEET ) LOT 8 ~ -SET IRON ON UNE 0.46' " EAST OF PROPERTY CORNER " 5 89'42'17" E , --109.58-- r -CORNER FENCE IS 0..2 " NORTH o.F PRo.PERTY LINE 1 ----~31.4n---- WI . 1 ~CX) ......N 1'). 00 'N o.~ 01 zl 2-STORY FRAME DWELUNG #8100 WYNN WOOD ROAD 42.2_ L-O\ I I I I I I N ,..: '? I I I I I I I I \ '. - FOUNO--',_ PINCH- TOP IRON --110.70-- 5 89'52'26" W o ,.., fl7YJVJVfI700./J .I?OAlJ CENTERUNE --, --~ o ,.., 25 FOUND 1/2" IRON , , \ IW I . 00:= '<t- .'" "'N :=0 10 I(/} ~ ~ ~I ~I ~I 25 I / FOUND PINCH- TOP IRON ~ Dire. NO, (J.1.1.184 Craig D. Halverson 8100 Wynnwood Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 763 545-2931 . I propose to replace an existing unattached deck with a screened porch on the north side of my house behind the garage. The garage, which existed when I bought the property, was apparently built as though the property had two side setbacks of 15 feet. However, according to my recent survey it also appears to be only 31.4feet from the property line along Bies. The screened porch that! propose to build is set back about 5 feet from the north side of the garage, but at approximately 20feet this would be less than the 24 feet that is required for a rear setback. Separate from the addition of the screened porch I propose to replace several windows, which are beginning to show their age. In this process I propose to add 9 1/2 inches of insulation to several of the walls by building a secondary exterior wall. I have done this in the past to two of my walls with very good results from a heating and cooling perspective. I have included a detailed drawing of the support box that I have used in the past and propose to use again to support the secondary walls. See the building floor plan for the locations of these walls. . . . . . . .. . . . . . 'all wwmci.go/dm-valky.mn uY 9-6-01 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 8100 Wynnwood Road Craig Halvorson, Applicant Council Craig Halvorson, with property located at 8100 Wynnwood Road, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals forvariancEls from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to replace a porch onto the side of the existing home. This proposed porch requires a variance from building setback requirements. Also. during the construction planning process, it was discovered that the existing garage, home and shed do not meet building setback requirements. This construction project requires variances from the following section of City Code. Licensing . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. City Code states that the front yard setback shall be 35 feet from the front yard property line. The variances requested are for 3.6 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 31.4 feet at its closet point to the front property line along Bies Drive for the existing garage. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setbacks. City Code states that the distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines shall. be governed by the following requirements: In the case of lots having a width greater than .100 feet, the side yard setback shall be 15 feet. The requested variance is for 1.5 feet off the required 15 feet. to a distance of 13.5 feet at it closest point to the west side yard property line for the existing home. . Section 11.21, Subd. 7(B) Rear Yard Setback. City. Code states the required rear setback shall be 20 percent of the lot depth. Staff has determined that the rear setback to be 24.05 feet from the property line to a structure. The requested variance is for 7.75 feet off the required 24.05 feet to a distance of 16.3 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the existing garage and for 3.25 feet off the required 24.05 feet to a distance of 20.8 feet at its closest point to the rear yard property line for the proposed porch. . Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code. states that the shed shall be located at least 5 feet from a property line. The variance requested is for 5 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 0 feet for the shed at its closet point to the west side yard property line. Also, City Code states that that the shed be located at least 10 feet from the home. The property owner is requesting a variance for the shed to be located 5.5 feet from the existing home. Parkway MN 55426-1364 (fax) (TDD) This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, September 25, 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. If you have any questions or comments about this variance request, you may contact the Planning Department at 763/593-8095.. Adjacent properties require notification.