The URL can be used to link to this page

11-28-00 BZA Agenda Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 28, 2000 7pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes - September 26, 2000 and October 24, 2000 II. The Petitions are: 433 Ensign Avenue North (Map 22) (00-10-47) Arlen Turnquist Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. . 1 foot off the required 5 feet to a distance of 4 feet for the proposed shed addition at its closest point to the rear yard property line. . 1 foot off the required 5 feet to a distance of 4 feet for the existing garage at its closest point to the side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a shed addition on the rear ofthe existing garage and to bring the existing garage into conformance with Residential Zoning Code requirements. 2936 Quail Avenue North (Map 4) (00-10-48) Jack Williams Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. . The requested variance is for .5 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 4.5 feet for a proposed garage at its closest point to the rear yard property line. . The requested variance is for .6 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of4.4 feet for a proposed garage at its closest point to the side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage which replaces a non-conforming garage. 8325 - 8459 Tenth Avenue North (Map 21) (00-10-49) Steiner Development Request: Waiver from Section 11.35, Subd. 6 (A) and (B) Loading and Parking Requirements . To reduce the parking requirements for this office/warehouse from 220 required parking spaces to 163 parking spaces. Purpose: To allow for the office/warehouse use to be brought into conformance with Light Industrial parking requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (A) Yard Setbacks Purpose: Request: Purpose: III. Other Business IV. Adjournment . The requested variance is for 13.8 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 21.2 foot at its closest point to the east side yard property line. To allow for the existing office/warehouse building to be brought into conformance with Light Industrial zoning district building setback requirements. Waiver from Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (C) (4) Yard Setbacks . The requested variance is for 4 feet off the required 10 feet with the result that 6 feet of the setback area is landscaped buffer zone. To allow for the existing office/warehouse building to be brought into conformance with Light Industrial zoning district green space requirements. . Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals September 26, 2000 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, September 26,2000, in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Those present were: Sell, Swedberg, Lang, McCracken-Hunt and Planning Commission Representative Robert Shaffer. Also present were Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development and Recording Secretary Donna Gause. I. Approval of Minutes - August 22, 2000 MOVED by Sell, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried unanimously to approve the August 22, 2000 minutes as submitted. II. The Petitions are: 1030 North Tyrol Trail (Map 9) (00-9-42) Doue and Pat Spauldine Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C) Side Yard Setback. 'e . .4 feet offthe required 15 feet to a distance of 14.6 feet for the existing house at its closest point to the side setback line along the east side. Purpose: To allow for the existing home to be brought into conformance with the required Residential zoning district setback requirements. Grimes stated the above request is for a minor setback variance on an existing structure. The request is asking for a 14.6 foot setback from the closest point on the house to the line along the east side instead of the required 15 feet. An addition is currently being added to the back of the home with the signing of a hold harmless agreement. Grimes stated there was no reason that this variance shouldn't be granted because we were dealing with such a small distance. Swedberg stated that this request appeared to be completely administrative and then he moved that they allow the variance as described on the agenda, Sell seconded the motion. Sell noted that the variance should be for.6 ft off the required 15 ft setback. MOVED by Swedberg to grant the variance with a .6 ft off the required closest point, seconded by Sell, and the motion was carried unanimously to approve the variance as stated above. e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals September 26, 2000 Page 2 5790 Westbrook Road (Map 11) (00-9-43) Julie Brown e Request: Waiver from Section 11.65, Subd. 5(A) Standards · 10 feet off the required 50 feet to a distance of 40 feet for the existing house at its closest point to the Ordinary High Water Mark for Bassett Creek; and . 22 feet offthe required 50 feet to a distance of 28 feet for the proppsed deck at its closest point to the Ordinary High Water Mark for Bassett Creek. Purpose: To allow for the existing home to be brought into conformance with the required Bassett Creek building setback requirements and to allow for the construction of a deck on the side of the existing home. Grimes stated the background. This request is for a waiver of lOft off from original subdivision from Section 11.65, which is for Ordinary High Water Mark for Bassett Creek. This setback requires that a setback of 50 ft. is required. The existing home and proposed deck addition is within this setback area. As required, Grimes has talked with Tom Hovey with the Department of Natural Resources and he has no objection to the variance. Grimes stated the existing deck is a ground level deck and the proposed deck will be a second level deck on posts. This type of deck will have less obstructing of the creek if there is a flooding situation. Tom Hovey did state that he would like to see additional shrubbery or non-mowed grasses along the creek area. Grimes suggested that applicant meet with Al Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator for the City, to discuss the types of improvements he could suggest for the area along the creek. Grimes stated the non-mowed grasses along the creek would help e with the run off into the creek and that it would help satisfy the DNR's concern for water quality of the creek. The DNR's current policy is to maintain any non-mowed strip along a creek or lake. Grimes stated the staff is recommending the variance, as it would present an improvement to the area. Swedberg questioned where the high water mark was on the survey. McCracken stated that the high water mark was something they normally saw on the surveys. Grimes explained that on the map they were identifying the high water mark as the survey line. Grimes stated the top of the bank of the creek is the high water mark. Lang stated they were talking about the ordinary high water mark, not the 100-year plain flood markings. Shaffer stated he has worked on various projects on Bassett Creek and the high water mark is different from point to point along the creek. Lang questioned if this is a new way of judging the high water mark distance or if the City has used this method before. Grimes stated it is not a new way and that we have used this way before. Grimes stated Tom Hovey of the DNR reviewed the survey and they had no problem with it. Lang questioned the comment of planting along the creek; he asked if it was a requirement or recommendation. Grimes stated it isa recommendation of the DNR. Grimes stated that we have this same type of request for natural plantings and non- mowed areas along the shoreline of Sweeney Lake. Swedberg suggested that a hold harmless agreement be obtained from the homeowner relieving the City of any responsibility of property damage if there were to be a flood because we allowed this variance. Lang asked Grimes if there were any previous agreements like this. Grimes did think we had done this in the past and wanted to discuss it with the City's attorney. He did not feel that the city would be held liable in this case or on any type of variance. Linda recommended that the city staff discuss this with the city attorney rather than making it a condition. Grimes asked that the City should seek the City attorney's approval of a whole harmless agreement. e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals September 26, 2000 Page 3 e McCracken-Hunt questioned to Grimes how the dimensions were determined because there were no dimensions of the house or deck to the edge of the creek. Grimes stated that they scaled it off based on the scale given on the survey. McCracken-Hunt was uncomfortable with that and Grimes explained that we do a lot of variances that way based on the drawings and the scales on them. Grimes continued to explain that after the footings are poured our inspection department does inspect them to ensure they meet the setbacks and if they don't they have to be redone. Grimes also stated, people need to be careful and ask for exactly what they want when making variance applications. Lang or Shaffer questioned if the surveys were to show the adjacent property. Grimes stated that per city code they are supposed to show where property and buildings were. Swedberg questioned whether on this survey they had actually gone out and found the location ofthe property lines or took the information from the City's inspections files. Lang stated that in the future the City should require more detail on the surveys. Grimes stated each petition is required to submit a survey by a registered land surveyor licensed by the State of Minnesota locating all property lines, buildings, and streets. Grimes stated this survey does show all of that. Grimes went on to say that the City could establish a policy that would request additional information regarding location to buildings, driveways, trees etc be included and he concluded by stating he thought that it was that way on the application form. McCracken-Hunt stated it was in fact stated on the application that the survey was to show approximate location of buildings on adjacent properties relative to the sides. Grimes stated they did that because the surveyors couldn't go onto other property and do the surveys and that this allows them to make estimated calculations. Swedberg presented the question of whether they had enough information on the drawings to make a decision tonight. Shaffer felt based on the plans they did have that he thought they were safe in making a decision tonight and that in the future they should require more detail. Lang suggested that the applicant go back to the surveyors and request the more detailed information of dimensions and have them submit them to the City. McCracken felt that more information would help the inspection department determine if the deck were within the code requirements. Swedberg stated we could go ahead and make a decision without it at this time but that we would request it and make it a requirement of granting the variance. Swedberg stated that the board's actions tonight would be based upon the assumptions from people who are familiar with surveys and scaling. . Lang asked the applicant ifthey had anything they wanted to discuss or ifthey had any questions. They did not. McCracken made the motion to approve the waiver for a replacement deck onto the back ofthe house as written with the 10 feet off the required 50 feet and the 22 feet offtherequired 50 feet with the following conditions: · A more explicit and complete survey with the dimensions noted is supplied. · Per the city attorney we have a hold harmless clause provided by the owner for this variance into the ordinary high water mark area. · A recommendation that the owner meet with the city Environmental Coordinator to discuss appropriate landscaping along the edge of the creek. Swedberg seconded the motion. He also stated with respect to a discussion of the point to be made that the improvement proposed by these people make the situation better than it is right now. Grimes stated the improvement is that they are raising the deck up above the flood way. All agreed. Motion passed. e The applicant asked for clarification on what was needed for the survey. It was determined that the applicant would contact their surveyor and have them call Grimes for what is needed. The applicant then asked who would get a hold harmless agreement? Grimes stated that he would notify the Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals September 26, 2000 Page 4 applicant after talking with the city attorney as to whether it would be needed and that the City would . draw up the agreement if it is necessary and then discuss the agreement with the applicant. III. Other Business A. Review a variance. brought to the board previously. Grimes wanted to discuss a variance that was brought before the board in July regarding a garage at 860 Hampshire Lane. Mrs. Patricia Burretts wanted to add a garage to the side of house. She originally wanted to put the garage 5.5 ft from the house, which would allow a 26 ft wide garage. The variance that was granted was for an 8.5 ft setback allowing a 23 ft wide garage. Mrs. Burretts has now sold the house to her daughter and son- in-law. The son-in-law is a contractor and has two large vehicles. After further investigation by the son-in-law, it was determined that the approved setback would allow only a 21 ft wide garage rather than a 23 ft wide garage. The son-in-law is requesting clarification on the variance. Did the BZA allow a 23 ft wide garage or was the BZA definite with the side yard setback of 8.5 ft.? He stated he could live with a 22.5 ft garage instead of a 23 ft garage. Grimes then read the minutes from the July 25, 2000 minutes. The motion that was carried that night was as follows: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback. · 6.5 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 8.5 feet for the proposed garage addition at its closest point to the side (east) property line. Discussion took place as to what each board member thought the variance was allowing. The outcome of the discussion was that it was to be a 23 ft garage. Grimes stated that if it is a 23 ft garage then the setback would be 7 ft not 8.5 ft. Grimes asked the board if they were okay with that: 23 ft garage with a 7 ft setback. Discussion _ took place and it was determined that the previous variance was granted based on the garage being a 23 ft . garage. Grimes asked the board if they care more about the size of the garage or the amount of the set back. Lang responded that ordinarily the setback is a more accurate dimension and is what they would go with but in this case they have approved a 23 ft garage and if the setback needs to be adjusted slightly they would be in agreement of that. Shaffer made a motion to allow the 23 ft garage with a 7 ft setback. The motion was seconded by Sell. Lang stated that the board would give Grimes approval to allow a 23 ft garage with a 7 ft setback. Grimes will notify the building officials of the approval of a 7 ft setback from the side yard. Shaffer brought up for discussion the fact that they were granting approval on variances for existing houses. He thought that the BZA board should make the recommendation to the Planning Commission to allow the City staff to make these types of decisions as an administrative decision and that only special circumstances should be brought to the board. Shaffer stated that the board could set guidelines for the City staff to follow and anything that would not fall within those guidelines would have to be brought to the board for approval. Grimes stated they applicants would still be required to obtain surveys and conform to all other requirements of a building permit. Sell questioned if the staff had the authority to make judgment decisions. Shaffer stated it would save a lot offrustration on the part of the public. Shaffer recommended that he take this to the Planning Commission and that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the City Council to allow the staff to make administrative decisions regarding variances on existing house with guidelines. Grimes stated other cities do have administrative variances. McCracken-Hunt suggested we look at some of them. Grimes stated he would check with the city attorney regarding what staff could do and what would have to be brought in front of the board. Grimes felt there would have to be concrete numbers to which they could make administrative decisions on or if it would have to be brought to the board. Lang asked Shaffer if he would be willing to work with Grimes on putting a proposal together regarding this issue. Shaffer agreed. All members on the board agreed to have this looked into. e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals September 26, 2000 Page 5 . IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 P.M. Robert Lang, Chair Mark Grimes, Staff Liaison e . '. e e Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2000 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, October 24, 2000, in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Those present were: Sell, Swedberg, Lang, McCracken-Hunt and Planning Commission Representative Robert Shaffer. Also present were Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development. I. Approval of Minutes - August 22, 2000 MOVED by Sell, seconded by Shaffer and motion carried approval of the September 26, 2000 minutes until the n Request: " ously to postpone meeting II. The Petitions are: 6860 Harold Avenue (Map 17) (00 Lowell and Janice Kleven .21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. required 35 feet to a distance of 34.6 feet for the se at its closest point to the front property line along venue. er from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C} Side Yard Setback. · The requested variance is for .3 feet (east side) and .1 feet (west side) off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14.7 feet on the east side and 14.9 feet on the west side for the existing house at its closest point to the side property line. Purpose: To allow for the existing home to be brought into conformance with the required Residential zoning district setback requirements. Grimes stated there was nothing to add to this petition, the applicant was allowed to go ahead with the work as the petition is for a couple of tenths off the front setback and .3 ft and .1 ft off the side yard setbacks. Sell asked if the lot line had changed when the city reconfigured the street. Grimes stated he did not believe so as the cul-de-sac portion of the street starts west of the Kleven property. Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2000 Page 2 MOVED by Sell to grant the variance as stated above, seconded by Swedberg, and the motion was carried unanimously to approve the variance. . 5940 St. Croix Avenue (Map 11) (00-10-45) Patrick and Kimberley Kane Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Rear Yard Setback. . The requested variance is for 19.6 feet off the required 47.9 feet to a distance of 28.3 feet for a proposed deck to the rear of the house. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a deck on the rear of the existing house Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7( r Yard Setback. . The requested variance isfo to a distance of 39 feet fo house. he required 47.9 feet deck to the rear of the Purpose: To allow for the ex' conformance wi requireme he rear yard to be brought into d Residential zoning district setback e n 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. ested variance is for .4 feet (west side) for the existing ,yhouse off the required 5 feet to a distance of 4.6 feet on the est side for the existing playhouse at the closest point to the side property line. Purpose: To allow for the existing playhouse to be brought into conformance with the required Residential zoning district setback requirements. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. . The requested variance is for 4.2 feet (east side) for the existing shed off the required 5 feet to a distance of .10 feet on the east side for the existing shed at the closest point to the side property line. Purpose: To allow for the existing shed to be brought into conformance with the required Residential zoning district setback requirements. e e e e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2000 Page 3 Grimes stated that this lot is very deep and the home was built on the back of the lot. This presents a problem because the rear setback is based on a percentage, 20% of -the total lot depth. With this lot being approximately 230' to 240' deep anything built on the back of the house would not met the rear setback of approximately 40 feet. There is also a shed on the east side which is .10 ft from the side lot line and a playhouse on the west side which is 4' feet from the side lot line; the variance will also put these into conformance. The current owners did not put on the addition and the cl,Jrrent owners would now like to make an addition to the existing deck for a hot tub. Mr. Kane stated that he did not know the shed or the playhouse was considered structures until they came in for the variance on the deck. He also stated that the owners on both the east on west sides have no objections to the new deck. The lots are very private. Swedberg stated that the reason the houses on this street lots was because of water problems on the front part at is only the unusual location of houses on these lots t Under normal circumstance, the houses would ha street giving them lots along St. Croix with lar ut on the rear of the edberg stated that it need for a variance. structed closer to the Shaffer asked the applicant if he consid of the east side. Mr. Kane replied th the area where the hot tub woul put the hot tub to close to th the house. he hot tub on the west side instead de has overhead power lines above use the deck would be raised up it would . It would also conflict with the rear entrance to MOVED by Swedbe ' motion was carri he waivers as stated above, seconded by Sell, and the usly to approve the variance. 4511 Strawberry Lane (Map 9)(00-10-46) Alexander Nazarenko Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(A) Front Yard Setback. · The requested variance is for the front entry wall and gate which is for 32 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 3 feet at the wall's western most point to the front property line along Strawberry Lane, and 1 foot off the required 35 feet to a distance of 34 feet at the wall's eastern most point to the front property line along Strawberry Lane. Purpose: To allow for the construction of an entry gate and wall in front of the existing house Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2000 Page 4 Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback. · The requested variance is for 14 foot off the required 15 feet to a distance of 1 foot on the west side for the entry wall and gate; 3 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 12 feet on the west side for the deck; and .8 feet off the required 5 feet to a distance of 14.2 feet on the east side for the deck. e Purpose: To allow for the construction of an entry gate and wall, as well as rear yard wooden deck. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(8) Rear Yard Setback. · The requested variance is for 2.4 feet off the required 23.2 feet to a distance of 20.8 feet for a pro eck to the rear of the house. Purpose: Lang stated that this property was be~ st July. Grimes stated a variance was granted previously for an additi attached to the west side of the house and now they would like to put 0 t e rear of the house and to construct a wall with a gate along the front y s Iso indicated that the applicant would be e putting in an escape win e east property line that would encroach into the side setback. Howeve Idered a permitted encroachment because it is needed for safety for more background on the request. Shane Coen and Craig Nelson of Coen and Stumpf Landscape Architects were representatives for Mr. Nazarenko, they brought along a model showing the location of the existing garage and how the wall would be an extension at the front garage wall in to the front yard. The model also showed the deck on the rear of the house.. The front wall would have screening of trees and shrubs all along it for privacy. McCracken-Hunt asked about the fence on the west side of the property. The applicant's representative explained that that fence would be a non-solid wooden fence and they are working with the neighbor to provide plantings along this west fence The applicant's representative stated the wall would be located about 17to 20 feet from the curb to at its closest point. The question was asked if the model represented the lot. The applicant's representative stated it showed the topography of the lot but he wasn't sure of the accuracy of the side e . e e Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2000 Page 5 yard. The model was done 2 years ago and they have been adding to it and changing the design. Lang asked why the wall was needed. The applicant's representative stated it is to be a gateway to the courtyard. It was meant for privacy as well as esthetics. McCracken-Hunt asked what the material of the wall would be. The applicant's ' representative stated it would be stone and limestone similar to the house and g'arage. The stonewall will be 7 feet. McCracken-Hunt stated it would be visible a barrier. The applicant's representative said an artist would design the gate. Lang questioned why need for enclosed courtyard area. The applicant's representative stated it is driven by privacy. The applicant's representative stated they would bring in trees for screening along the west property line. Lang questioned if the applicant's representative's h previous BZA meeting in July 2000. They stated t was one who stated the site was being over u addition was proposed he felt the site was would make it worst. Shaffer felt the dec stated that per code this site far ex small lot and that they are hittin He felt the 1 st addition was t 0 the applicant was asking or inutes from the Shaffer indicated that he r built. When the earlier '. uilt and now he felt this addition ssue but the wall was. Shaffer it should be and that it was a fairly k and exceeding 3 out of the 4 setbacks. d w they were asking for more. Swedberg felt n what was reasonable. The applicant's repr to discuss the wa tated he didn't understand their point as they were here ence and a deck. Shaffer explained tha the BZA doesn't normally allow structures within 2 ~ to 3 foot of the setback. Grimes asked if there were any utilities on the west side of the lot because the City has a 5-foot utility easement along the west property line. Grimes stated that a structure or wall couldn't be put in a utility or drainage easement area without permission from the City. Discussion took place as to the wall extending into the 5-foot easement area. McCracken-Hunt questioned the height and size of the wall needed to maintain privacy from the neighbors. Lang questioned the signatures of the neighbors on the variance application forms. Grimes stated they represented the neighbor's knowledge of the proposed additions. Lang asked for the names of the people in the audience; Nancy Whitney of 4520 Strawberry La, Joanne Fredsall, west of property, she stated change is not always easy, she like the openness of the neighborhood. David Andreas of 4501 Strawberry Lane felt t Minutes of the Board of Zoning Appeals October 24, 2000 Page 6 f that this would be the only home in the area that had a wall of this type. He questioned the applicant as to whether they looked at minimizing the wall in any way. The applicant's representative stated they had looked at other materials and that they wanted to continue the look of the garage to the wall. IT WAS MOVED to grant the variances for the Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (A) Front Yard Setback and the Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7(C)(1) Side Yard Setback. . MOTION was seconded; the motion was carried with a 4 to 1 vote to deny the variances. IT WAS MOVED to grant the variance for the Waiver from Section 11.21, Subd. 7 (B) Rear Yard Setback. IV. Adjournment to approve the THE MOTION was seconded; the motion was carried u variance. III. Other Business None The meeting was adjourn e Robert Lang, Chair Mark Grimes, Staff Liaison e ,,,;;.0 433 Ensign. Avenue North 00-10-47 Arlen Turnquist . . . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner From: Subject: 433 Ensign Avenue North (Map 22) (00-10-47) Arlen Turnquist, Applicant Date: November 20, 2000 Arlen Turnquist, with property located at 433 Ensign Avenue North, is requesting two variances from the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to build a shed onto the rear of the existing garage. The applicant is also requesting a variance from the side yard setback to bring the existing garage into conformance with Zoning Code requirements. The requested variances are from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the required side yard setback for any accessory building shall be 5 feet from any lot boundary. The property owner is requesting a variance for a shed to be constructed 4 feet from the rear yard property line. In addition, the existing garage is 4 feet from the side yard property line. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in October of 1957 for the construction of the garage. No other pertinent information was found in the file. (:zl "" '" ~i i"":,- -, __, 0 \I' t::\ ~ ~ .j .~) I ~H;o) LW ,to -.- ,~ \; ('31 '2 3 -~ ~ It\ 3;; ~ ~ ~. 588' ClO I (>; N89~43'15"( .t: ~ ,- , Easr ~ ZO' - ~ -~7-TH_ -- -t:y~..- .....,. _ N<2:.~' ~ 2, . &0 W ZOO I ZIB 170'),l'iS'I<t,). . ~ VALLEY I rnJSTRIAL .~I 0; ~ .., 11\ "2. ~ t:f ~ "10; I --+ I I~.' I, 'Z.1.~.7..11'1J2. I ' .".'11 " w ~ "I' ---.. -- - 4&47/ ~ ~ ,--. -"""'-" J' - - . ~ ::i---'~' - - -: - - ;.: -;-.;;-.--- ~-. ~_. ~ : ~, : t:~-1 '~-'''-L... / , : u l-J~_.-"-~T 'P- _ ;.- - - \. --------+-'.; .....-: \.-....... L. . . :: I.", .;- - ." ~ ,Y,_", " I '...: (fi,etf 3-6-70; '--" . UZ0.61 (CSI%?)'" :~ ~ 'C'" I' t...:.'.s:~:{I1~ ____ .. Jill ZO'I1.<;O"" -':':'*_:~~'~~: :..~~_---,~:,. '---.':..or'-j".,- ;..t. "". T I~"S I ! /"'.Z.I ",.,...".,r, 1.- ~. I , ~14.1 '1: "';' '"-reo., ~ it;,)J) j 'ltl' ";;: ~ (1;;.1 (&) (0) en to "8a~51'E) lIB l'lr 1 .'.~ --iGOll}E-H- 5;:.' ;2: ,'/t-L . -V-~l:-\;E't-;- ' ...,,"~ I so ; ~-- ~) :r \k, ... ::l 0 2 ~ Q. b- 0 >= >- ... 3= <3 I~ ;.. :I: J~ (10) _~.\~l~_ ~'>~,." ~1 (j) ~ iO~ 0 ' ,. ; I1A.t V~' '~"r:I!' ~Q ,., " .:: A ~' 110 LLi ~ .:: 'L", I (1151) "ft,")", 3; ~,'l1.'.14' . 0.1'.0'" 1>' "I.' ... z.'-oo' 1(.~ !&'.14' \ I '\ .... __..-~' -..-.-., .0. ~" '" . to'?" ';--=":--'" : f. ..\.~\~~~~'\' _-.\;:::-----.-. ;g : ~'l.i.,;'Y A' --- \ \ 2'i Subject Property: 433 Ensign Avenue N Arlen Turnquist, Applicant \ \ \ --0.J.z' . : V<: ,j;J7i3g!c~O'Jj~~~-' . t" 6.,'zHS'...: ('/-/. O. 35095) ( 1410) " .", I C",) i '" ~ ~ /,;'l ,~ l'''' '" ~p~~,.tA~t'''~'' .:: C!1) p .: .:: (!1~4) ('i) .::. I " '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 i~) _ ~~) I ~. (1) J(~':: ~(1)~ " " ,'I'" . \ I) r" 'a ~o '0 a '1.44. · ~ WALLY T ST. lH~ '1,,) {' ,n I " ~1) _.1:1 to) \",~j G -() ...1 0 0 F E' o! \1'1 ~ ..,. '" ""j - E:: ~"',,~ 0-~f , /OBToPO (t<?) k ., ._.-1 " , ~ (y; -. (I~) .. ::~::~: g .....~. .. r~:;, ~ r'C> 33 :lll! <>:~. ~- .,; '" T 70 LL.I "th.. ',1,', 0-J (I) i . i ! . 6~Oq"'''\E.'' I I " ; COt'OO,,\,,\U I I I~ I ~ " . I' I ~."'O) i \} \ f,\t'J en ...J ...J ::E 1 i il J ~ .. d' ~ i ~ 4!l3J) .. . en ::; 1,,1.i) I..C!l!/A'f.,4 BHfY- , i 'i~, j I . . . . . . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number Date Received Amount Received ($50 residential - $150 other) PETITION FOR pRDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street addressof property involved in this petition: 'I) 3. E H>Ij>N. 4vtt/ &-bl clef!! il/;Yrl1,.v BZA Petition Date /1 .-:2 </ - 1. 6J 00 Petitioner: A~ IEN T 7;; f[N'~tlI5r Name t . eN .- IV If v. .- !. Address 6 /;<- .3 '1:2 - :l.. '). 7-1.. Business Phone ~1 2. 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): 7fl.Act /1. , I? e P l; Ie f{ eel t ft-li/ 5 ull. V E V ,k~. '1 t'/.. ~ I 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: X Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office . Other 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. Jpe- ~-:tI;/CJ~A1_ ~P;:h. C"'~-'rZ~~ \c/.ktUif<-:.,., / 'p' C?JU'i'I<J (Staff will complete this item) . 8. 4-ncf ~~;/ ~ 1/) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by. a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the ,house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. . 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF . GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. . Print Name <;1-<:f?1,. V\ Z", IL-eI ,S: 'S;;<t /1/ ~:fj,~ Comment ;-P'7 dLL h:t'<:'" ,. /" ! Signalu~ Address 4'';'( "'?Qs',<11 au-IV~ Print Name -;:;7 e(:/~ \.) -;; A j1c.fO /) Comment Grc:~1 Signatur~ Address /?'9CJ ~ 6-"-- Print Name ~ ,,~d'(~~~, Comment Off ~'t. nn.~' . Print Name j"F"'r;;~..:::~ 1'0/ ( l l \ 0 . ." .....-; (-:;.1.0[')\") J~~~ h..;1 /~ Signature J: ;.f;(cJ If// (f/,'v!t-vr. \/ f~ V Jfr~ If ~rl.?J-m <M 1"4'1 <W Comment Address q'n ~ I/O (~/l\.J /'-,.1(7/'"1 {...'W ll) G-V, ~=- Print Name Comment: Signature Address Print Name Comment . Signature Address 7. I would like to extend the length of my 22' x 22' garage by ten feet. This would .. be added onto the rear of the garage. The floor would be a 10' x 22' concrete slab. The 2 x 4 walls would rise up to meet the roof line, which would be carried out the same as that of the garage. The back or west wall of the existing garage would remain intact which would make the new area a room in and of itself. There will be a door in the wall between the garage area and the new area. There will be a 7' or 8' door opening in the north wall of the new area. The exterior of the addition will match the existing siding of the garage and the entire building will be repainted one uniform color. 9. We need an area to store our lawn equipment, deck furniture, snowblower, etc. A . 22' x 22' garage with a car and pick up in it does not leave much room for anything else. I considered building a storage shed, but I feel building onto the garage would look much more appealing. It would be an out of sight out of mind area to add storage. The southwest comer of our lot has a 6' high privacy fence OLJ.'- blocking the view from ettt- neighbor to the south and a lilac hedge on the west ow-'- side. There are no buildings on the lot west of 0Ht lot behind the garage. Right now there is a small metal shed behind the garage which will be disposed of. . v~n~~r~vftln U~. ~UKVEY 'CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ARLEN TURNQUIST 433 Ensign Ave. Golden Valley, MN #~ Me M, r' /" ,-SON. .' .. o Leg Description: R~ . "F 811-I'mll1/> Tract .M, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 30. ~" . uzj'SIP "If - 5_1./17 _ /53. Z. I I . Scale: 1" =.20' I o penates iron monument_ xooo.o = EXistinglelevation Be~rings are assu~ed t1 I ,~ I I r TRACT M 4((CA=I7,fOZ.l359-t:1.1 37 _ .x"lOO.1 IN /-iII -.. ~t: Jf ,. ,-' ( ~ \;:, (. "- <--' II.; '--=' ~~ { ~ 4+ -----4j-- ---------- -~; ...J.....\~ . t-~.~.~ . . J 2.2... . - , D "-, - ''1-- +; "'pl.&- to %,,/1 ~JZ(J r-e'l7Cc.. ~AJh7~~Tt. "/~ lL'iI-.Jc/.=!~5:" 1/ /lnDUE/.: 'JotJ.t.2. ~~._._- ..,-..- - i '. 13t1.l10-);8c9-Y9oitiJ r- .-g:~.l .' ," _ . ,- _" I "'! ;t. . '" ..' "',l,m'~,~, Qg,~~" . .1 ~__rl4I"'" '.., . ".,-L--:ii----l.,~ " ,to.S +'2- Im~ ~ 511e-o #0.42/ . TWe, S'n:>kZy ;=,<Z4N 7e AI........Q'" . I , l , -..... " I ~ ..... I \~) ~ ~r- t-0 ~ ... ", ~ I', I tV.? 4133 ?he> $?My:>7YCCCl ~ ~v.f$ I ~ $0 900.7 8,," r- I I -. , t'-. ~ ~ " I .(,..,. ( \- ..'11 ::- - rr;1I. ~-r II \;-,(.... I Benchmark: TNH SW @ Ensign and service drive. N.G.V~D. 1929 adjusted elevation = 896.83 feet. I hereby. certify that .this isa true and correct representation of a. survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of the location of all bUildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me this 26~9 d~y Of~ctober, 2000. ~~.~~ Herb F. Lemire RLS Minnesota Reg. No. 13349 4416 Abbott Ave. N Robbinsdale, MN 55422 Phone: 763/537~0497 . G ~ ! i I I I , i Lr''-''" I i ! I ! i ! ! ~ I ! ~l ~ I ~ ~ ~ w I i I I I I I I i I I ~ r:.~$n-~ r 12./ ~ - ,I It- ~ I I L, ~.~. j . '~ /~ /\.4.I'.,r..a.~ ...t.-'k. ~. ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ / ./ I ,""./ cu~t/t..e;9,L, (Ml-t."1.- / fl" ?, o~~ 1 T ,-1 t f ~ T I f - ~ . ... ~ I i I I I , I i I ! I J. I\'{ . ~ I@ ! I 1 I ! i g . f i ! I I I I ! /"iJvt I I ./ ( ~t~~ I , I ! . . 1 . t, , 2. . . 3 . .Lf . . . ley 11-15-00 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 433 Ensign Avenue North Arlen Turnquist Arlen Turnquist, with property located at 433 Ensign Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for two variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a new shed onto the rear of the existing garage. In addition, the applicant would also like to request a variance for the existing garage because it is less than 5 feet from the side yard property line. These construction projects require variances from the following section of City. Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the required side yard setback for any accessory building shall be 5 feet from any lot boundary. The property owner is requesting a variance for a shed to be constructed 4 feet from the rear yard property line. In addition, the existing garage is 4 feet from the side yard property line. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, November 28, 2000, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Adjacent properties require notification. :i .:t.l "..".:.;,~ '1 ~936 Quail A venueNQrth 00-10-48 Jack Williams . Hey Memorandum Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) To: From: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 2936 Quail Avenue North (Map 4) (00-10-48) Jack Williams, Applicant Date: November 20,2000 Jack Williams, with property located at 2936 Quail Avenue North, is requesting two variances froIp the Residential zoning code (Section 11.21). The applicant has approached the City to demolish the existing garage, with the exception of the foundation, and replace it with a new garage. The applicant is requesting variances to build the new garage on the same foundation, which does not meet the . current setbacks of the Zoning Code. When the applicant submitted the survey of the property it was noted that the shed on the property infringes on the rear yard property line. As a condition of the granting of the variances for the garages, staff recommends that this shed be moved to conform with the accessory structure setback of 5 feet from the rear and side yard property lines. The requested variances are from Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the required yard setback for any accessory building shall be 5 feet from any lot boundary. The property owner is requesting a variance for a garage to be constructed 4.5 feet from the rear yard property line and 4.4 feet from the side yard property line. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in January of 1948 for the construction of the home and in December of 1950 for the garage. No other pertinent information was found in the file. . #061C ""E S'" li LI:r- UJU- , . DOl< 'oOE "OE OOOE' .-l.i'" 58 I -: I -. I'"' ,- I./~'::""I"~~ .'C-'- ~ _~LE~L'!1f ,0'E./: I UE-if''io,,'- 00.0 ..ifo "00.0 NE6" "~o ..;62~ i8'~' Z~"'~-;'_'",,~r-' -3T'.~-'r-'~~:,~". (Il\l' \re=~ - ':\""ti{H.lltl..u. --:; -'1 ~--~.-'.L<!.E~_!9gf..-~&j'/~'iZ.I -'~~v'ZVF3ftN-=tNrlOO6~::; s..::: 'E8Z DZBZ Z, z, ~W.8 1,.1'" -. -~ .~ ,- "-1" j 1'''''1 ~ <~ "4:' 0, ",," 9< ~ - - - -_'PIi.il.__JLU__'.IR $1..1 :::;;.. .1 IPSZ . ,f'I"-Lj1;Y-.'?'~Z ""'J~ \ 'd."1z _Sl'L' 'S'U ;:}, .. i'i;!: '<$"";:; :'_.; ~ :\.,.:. .".... N,,,, ....~W;.. . -;L ---O.O~'~' Ii : ,.' 0.9;! om . _, i'- :N: ,lar....:._:.!. '2;.:.~~~..\OI~" :~~'..;bO'~ ,~ . /~.~.o, ,Iz ~:;::: ., II ,~ I ~:;: ", "".... ~ . : :'$: ~:.....~ ~ i 2 - O!E ~._.;...... ~;.... ~Iiii..,. ~ ..fZ....o"S .ZI 00..' !:" ~ u ,BE oe se ... " . '. .'CJ6a - Ot.tz!>! !3':: ".~~. " ~'!! .~I'........ ;~ =~~;. NO: ..... : : : .... r: I >L L"i'Ir . , =---- ~'"-- 08 .;.~il ~"S,'!f DUZ ~ ~f;~." ~;J.: 1:: :.. . oS. N: - I ~ I.! I '0 I I _...0 0 .~.,~ .ON. .. 001 "":f.. ~'Ot ~.t' u' . 'r.' ., .. '.-:-!!:'.J.":t !!.';l!::!;;'i:2. ~~-e;;",::: .l:3^,;J~O~VH'"I~0..,:-.,.~~..t .: ~ 9~O~' U ;J. I ./.SIUIICIW'ft"~.J.': . . .s.;;~" e~ CI.~ -of"L:t~" .... .... ~.~i;~.S CE'E 9Z' .'iT IOIE ., ",or- DoC 90.< ZOc' 0" .. , 1 r,.;q ~ ~ ~.o . . rj ., ~~;' ,;II:.. ~ 11,". u.~~, .ZOE"OE 'ODE - ..;! OU2Sfl^,~'.ZOO6--' ,0 ~o' ~::?-! ::.~.b~. - ...~:r,"li'O;.;l:. ,'/1" '~<j~""'il ,;:,".'" I ~ ,"I::~~<::.Z 10.Z -,'i',YI1~~V ~ !!r "'. .' ..~'l~. - ....,:.:;:~w~......:; -1!, ... ".....' '<$".1'.: w ;"f~; . ': . ,"''''I'U~':'' "I '" :::Z~s;. · t-.- V' 011 II · 011 · Z,~ '," .: ~I := >!:! -......... I' '<I' :. n. !D :.... I' I', ~'" ;:;= -T-o ~;> , 011 <t .0' ~ .8 _'fl "' .I../. <: .28 0:: - : A: : :" :. - :. "" . !! ~ ~~i::.: ~ "" .. ii:::...!. !::! ~ ~ ~ S!ON ::;:. .-{i!l. ~ ~_.N ppz ... 0 "'L ; :0" : : :, - - li! . Z . ~- "'("" .- · 1LI - g.. "s..- """ L . _ ~o ~ 9~.u 8 ., i -'-- -- lJ _ _ ..... ,:~.__ '___... :: BE,S"-,'S :--z>.... . ~ -'" Z . ~ "~-~ H~' ~~ ~~~~: ....O!.~j.J'!!i,-i.~i.~:.... ~L..::'Ej~~. i .....ta'.~.~. !!"!..;t.", N.'~~. _ r-I ... .~.... I.' Ia - .. -' ~ r:::.;: L G Y.I ~ ~ ~") :;E. . ~ 0 ... '" ~,,-":'6n"L ~.c: 'vu'e ,,"'..- -OJ=. -..... -'-- <.> .'L' i '~-::;. - v'rir--I~ .: ovt, ~'VI(_ ....e....."'" ';:-,1 ! -.... - ~~.- . ~ '" ... "I ~c>" '3^~E 6" ~ ",~;" "".~.:r.l :;;..0f4 ,.,. ,. r- '<t ;;; . .i 61'- _ r-_-~fl:iI'C-. () \V ~_ ~D'lPtf[j.3FI6Z 0 ~ \O..~ ~ -...~ .411"- o. lai - I .~,___I ~ ~~~,~.,~--" .., _, ~ ~~Z .;! ~~~, CL, r _ . ..... ~..~ :I!:I' ... ~~.... ~~ ~It::~ ~ IA:~ ,.... ,"- ~ ~!_~ lI) ~ '4 :~: ~~. ~:? 1~8.l.:76:1 f~.' ~s : o~ LI~~t~. f. -; . ~ t- _. .., ",' (2, .. ~ - ~ .f.1. ; ~. =' \ ,,' 4 '. _ : . , , J. C . . ~ .::1 '" ~,. ~~. 0"-' :\0 . ~ ~::: ,.." I~~~--....tii-- 'V"l'i":'. .~:. -;;:... ~ J- ~J ~'<$";: '"' ~ ",f::'" 0'..... ..;!:..... !:;..~~..<; II) .~..~5~~~~. :..~U~ ~'. _. = 0 ~ ~ ~ .. r-.; ~ ~ ~ . .-; :!: -:: '. = -'-- ' ,~. ~ . ;< !!..-<I;"'~'lI:./~lt~.>-,N.:. '3 .~ . '~I " rN... ...~..! .' , '0' Cl 'C = ., . . "'--"';/ " 'I ~ f' ~ ~ ~ l ~'i~ ~-,'j,.i~-~- ~ ""':;-, ;J- ~''I''N' ~ '~i ::L:~~., ".. <t I- l'f').~ 'It . ~ ~,...... \ll ~~ .. Oil f ..r.~~;;~.., ...j . ~ = ~ ~ to..... _ ".. _ \<.~ ,.... .,~"p~ 'i '" 0 <='I _ . .". -. .....".... '" j' - '" t:- it'I>s."G .~W;l~1 "I">>.....~ .... ~ ~,=i o! ."'i~: II a;' M ~I~ ~ .... 9~' - - ll, :' . - -;r ,_- __-' ~...r;i'--- ..!:"f€I'=-~-- - _ - - ~ "" ZI6Z '~:..frj '"'l c. .- '.0'6_i~ . .., ~{ . _, .,... " ,." 4' . ,,,~ "', . ,~\" .. ~,' r h....0f4 <> ! . lI.J. ~ .I ,nor ~ slt,,, ("fe" ,.:.../ or. ~ ::\ :,..... _ "'...... ~ 'J'.,..' 01" m>\' '"DDS;! ~., ~...... ......:;:!. 'It- .... " ~!'''"... ~. I ..,-f--- "I-:".7"'~~$oii'.",_ ~!!i:. .-r= ..." 1d=-1'i~ i ~~....;r.~ ~~;:'''''l'';M'~' t- .. ~. · -.'~, ~g'" ..~.ti'!r~~. 0 , ,_ ,.......,."","..r) Fit \~. 'o_1.~::!...;l;r~.:'7. '~zli'':.l. ~ ~ . ;........ t I..P.....~ - . -'r .'~..., .....,./ "~.- r..-.~", .L .-.,':;'0:..., "...,'t, .,.-1".,,'. r ' f.t. t. Jt' ",,", ..1'" -: .," '..e:~ . 3-r. ~.!' ~:- ~ 'i ~\.", ..; CD ,L ~- ;:- '" ~ 1........--;; , .~;- ~ ':. -;" ""'l'l ,." Nr :::"'31 I, I ~~ -, r is/ .!~~. ;~ .'~"p... '<,~) ~~~~J; :',~. ~ ~...~- ~~ ~ ~= --J.:~~ ..~._. ~ ~.'::'~ ~~o '<.,~~;. \'d'I.;;'!!!!,.~; ~i' , _ ,.., z.~... "" ~ , '", -' "-- .~,..' -I C"j .... ," ".- -- " ....' ..:- ......' .... - · ~ "" oPe_' s. ~. su;; '" -;;-' .... ~...... ,." ':' ~t~~"\\ ~~ :--.l <Ll I~ ~ ~ ~ - ..-:~ ". ~ ':-~...,~ 'oil - ... ~. _ 1'01-- I 2~ "'S 2 . tf.o: tf,. . 0 ,. - '\ ~t .-....:lC: 1"-.--: ::;~~ ~i!J"of;: ~ ....::l '0 ~I r- I' ..../ o}":'-e;" /",/ ;tdi ~ ,~~. :' ~ ~,.Q C"j .2.J 0" oi:.';~;;; Y;~, l! ;,..::.:,.. ~... . z.:!1 1..0 ! . /' :i1iV ,../1- ~ ___5I/"D. ,0262,,\'\ I ,;:::1 = 00'7 :/,.- to ;, ~ ~ !!! '. >'l~... "'l6i#~ . PI ~ .si /f .. _, .3 - ~ )... ~S'rl l' 'f;'.O~~~f.? 9f6!. ~O\ g16Z. 10.",1! ~ ~ rJj ~ -if ~ : \.~~e6.c,1. ....0 r," ~~1s \ '" ,-e. ~ t.Q ~ ~ I i (' R\h. !, ~~ ....."., '"":1::1 ~ l~' ><.'~., E<5T" L" .~<- ..... ~ .( ~""....'." ~''i~' . .~. E .",,'SI. !>! ~ ."~r,s /1 ~.:;-...l ;~ . t'J;J}"i'5L.';'-"~'~ ,,4-.... l';:-"'" .~l!''f.:Ot2Zl~.~.ii. 'l;~ '/o~~'" "'....(~!,~ itI.:-. 'OOZ "0 '(J~2 'OIF 1 A ~ ..n, l." 1 r-' ~ ~ a to. . "C:t'''' oz, ':t'~~'- gj./'Z ~~~. .~'t:; TI..,(e.'" -r- ..'Jl,'Z.i'" , ll"/~J N s/'.r, ~ .!:' .....J/ "S'. ;;, O....I"~~- \ O\l;.fh<dl -.... ..., ~ : C'I\. c....~.. ~ IOl~,' !!.. ~\~o 0 ~ 1-,"'0 ~ ."$,;~~~.;~ f ' . '''. r ' '"It .. ~ '-"..- :. N '" ,. . . .' .,: - ...' r- ..",' . . 995 . ,\.~~"t~-! --j-..._.. . ....: S( "S; ~ .." OD/ lIt _ ~~;i, .....~ -, ~ & ~ $l ~'tp.. f'~JiCl~Ct:~ iii' ".' ~ ... "0' ~~. ~ : ~ 's \.,~.." :.. . ,,~. _ 0;:-;/ '. : -: C "'-: ,." "'....- .ll 0 ....,;- '" ~~ ,.~~. . '. . ,", '0 "';' .,;' '.' '*'. .. /; .Z, I' /~._ "...... .__ c>' li'Jt. '" ,'I>~ - - - , ~C) .,~'.:r. ~ ~ o~'t".;c~~''v ' .."" z;~r.. .,'. . '. ti....r..11'J. "'O~tl~ro.-:;' :j~' "oil"~":~.j ...."'/;{ . ~~.!~ ': ~~~ oP. ~~/ ~U' "n \ " ""...." .. re · '" ~ ~ "1:. ~ - --: ..... - .r. ?~ t W I _ ';-..:.0 ."~~ ~.~. '1.' .,. . : ,I\.. =..;~ t.~ "'Z 0" .<>:o;.-'t"'i"~:it-' . t-~ ,0~.A. -Z ""'. '.'.L 1:","> ~ ;r; i{'",..iI~, + " ~ q;..~~ / ... ., 1 .) "'"., .'; . ";' I ., .::; !!;~:! c <> ~.~, . ~ ~ · ;:. <t L I <Z' :lC: itf.r4lf!i~li1.:.'o?'" y;'N. ,~O f','?. - of ~::JI ~~~~l- ~\ ~.\ O,ql_1~~-:- ~i-~4i1:~tri:t~8~~\~$ ,,~;,~~'~O. ~\...,. ~. rl~BOr-- ~I :; ~.;" ...;~~ ~ ..:s-'#!CS'cJo~ . .~b . I ~: .l~tl. "'~'UI I SOl Jt COI 2.- ....~~!cf\'."!~!t' ~ ,oo\~,\'!i rs:1...J It) - ..J __:.. ,-\,>\.~ ~+~.~ ",."tJ1/1'1I1 . +r\I\~~ -0.$\".:- _II,.01".~ ~.t'J,.\.t'4' ~~"'~ U) ... Or_ LI-n, I- Q:;.,~-::, 'F{~ '" 0'" _. ~s "_"~. c,,~t,6~ ~ -~ a a ,'iI"'" i;; J;.......!CO: o. 0 ~ 1c5;".!!~'" ~<> _~ . "'r-l r--.....::- ...., .. ~."\' ,~l! . oo'.-"'.r. ....~...~ci~ ~ ~'lr- I..i <( 2~ 00 ;'1_ t " '.:_ .~__ .:::~... :--~~A'''''' S .-'''/1 ~ usz ,,~~~J.,~"OI ..,<I,::' J"! . :;;_'S":-~...."T ...:; >i' ::E" '0 000"" -,;;'~ll m.'''....:!;.. ~ J~."" "o.'I~:f -":\'I>e~'"'~''' III 10 ,...';- ...; " -r:;:!'."-' ..;~ ~ ...~I "li' V ." .~~)I l.Jw..... 0> ~. .,'!!'l ..,.Zt).' 'iI. - ~,.Q -10" - !:! ~ -..I;.~~" ;~',(,G g -...,"-"': 0 ..'.....~ . ..i ~~.~::- "" ~ ,.!;- :J Vgh:' ,:::1\...10:'-'" >!I_ _'.;:; It.'co ~ : 0 _ ~ "'"t '" ....." ~:;: j"," :~.. ! ':o;:~, :5' .~,~.,. · 2 i .~,,\;!;...;;....,:;lo -'! ~ co!'l:' i'ilU'\l . ,0.1'",' "/.'511 ........ ~ ~ .-!, /.. .'-i'''' o~ 0' ..' Iol~ L/'Io{ , ~~V:~"'.\ i~\;.'.'''''I;c'... ~ ~ .~ Q!;;; N . ~~U!:: dl OZI ;;; 2 ~ =='\.... -"<........:,...... '''E<.i6'N '3N' ""''''ilIC.CW' "m '{('''II 1-';'~.t~~~":' ~::.. ~:I." 00' 0'1,:.t""'U1:-!rH'~~ !2?:..1 ;j ,,0:-%. ~ . ~ ::'.iI ~~;o .:. ., 1:".,::;':1 o.~m .......Z ~-.. O:)! ." ._.~: N 3 '3^ . 'ff"~ . ~.'~.. """" - ~ . il:;:- - ~ ..... <: ;;~ ,. '(~"'I"''' · .' 2 8: .~~~ ~/ j '"~. ::.'1)-"1 2ml "':' .ODE 21 'f/ ~....i(/,~~:OO~lit~~ (::.j-~~ l-V: - ~ I ~'- ~.!:! ~ ,~ t- ~~ "":! '" ~I ,~:1 ~ ._ .....~ ~i$..~ ' .'~\, 0 C8>i'\;.,,'" ~ .J: 0' . ~f~i" ....1.~'5-',~ -".2._ 011 "." ;'~'.~r,"s/I ~ ~.,;' ""~,sz.' o 110Z _:;:! ~;; _. ~ :'1,1\ ~ ~', ~.~ ~i :"7;.'1s:'~~\1'" -;.~,,:!:o~~s.~~z ::,~ ~~~ '\: " 00' 001 /""'<8 .., ~ If) ..e~1l\I ;.'. ,,. -.;; I~..... ~ .:.~ - .. .,0 ". -*J)" Lt ~ ~,' ..... ". i:: '~E'" ..,~~..., 'Ii . :'>'A," , / 'z ,.ZU ~~ ~.. . U\ . ,-~-- ~ ..1~ ~~... ~.- ~ N:./: .. If "'ON.o - '\~~ O"'~ J!..' 0)".' ~'-., ~;-:: ~ '~<:/"'r---...~V 0../ ~ .,.", .... 0 ~~. .N.." ".::IS,. 0', R'P r.~ ?~ ;'" -:-;. ,+ \\~ ~ · ~ >~ 11 .ir:;' ~. ~~ . .\" '!Jo 4j~~. ~ .; r- \a-~ pr- 0, CftIG1~'l. / ? ~'O't' ~". ~ ~..... 6'1,' :~:.l ~ ..t>,_~ .t~;o M;P ; / ~. \. V:l't.., /'i"'S~l'? ~~,~~,.; Ji.l.~~'''<'/' '0'0".;;' ~~t::.~ '" s: , /..... 1-~ -S co... 3qW.0G"'.€ o. / Q v. _ ~:;I "0--'. -, ...."'4 ~<> 0, ~ ..,., .'. ......~ . ,,' \.. "..... ~ '0' " ~, ...... ~, <l: - :1-~':l..... \;t065: '00"(1'. ."" 0 000 ~=:"o:: - ".:-,.; '" 'b ~ ~ ,~~ ~ 'XTJ',,, r.J~.~..~, Ui . ~~ ~I L" ~ ".oz" _m. " g ~ -'--1-~ ~ ~ '" i- ..." I 10,,::' '" "'. i Ii! :- .'! ~ Z.:i!" .s-..-.V "'^ ~ ~,j V~Jnd ,-',.-- tJ.... " '" 0 -"jv..;>'JY 5" ~ ",. ~ ..:2;. In ", '. .... ~ (! ~!!' ,... I,-%-...v'.m ~. __' 9 0 .0' ".. I'I'f'Y1f$i. .' '. ~ ~... ~ "S ~V-" ... oj -_.. ::N ~ W. ~'I>:... '''.' :ill . ~~ ~fo::-.,.p.::!: .0 !:!:':; .. I g >. .-/" ,~, t, Sl&o 3. ';-~, ~ r, ". ,_ 0 0 ..::J. ~ _'l'~ . DO'E 0' r1" \ iLl 021 . "~'i'- !:! '-J.D,~,- ::> N. r- ... '~".;"~ ~ i Ol' ,,' .. C>.l-~ ..,..:<~.j \~ : OS62 O~6Z zZ~i'6Z z.ot, ~ ~ .1 0' 06 ~/)r: ...Jy. ~ 1:2,. 006Z ~ F--- ' ,:. , .p - ~ .... \o.3"",^ N30109 ~O All) ''''J.SA~O ~O U/) 'E~ 0: it "0 .. ~.,. ~ ~.V'.... "'.. ~ ~ ~ ~. I, " ... _.Z.y!J/I_n 1 , C p,' -, -%"1 I _.' "'\"~ OY . ..... 's;~'tllfiZ2 .-... ..i 7.'.... }.'.{ .. '.~:"'.~ :,' ,i. ....,j. l"t ~ .. ~..~ ~ - . - ~; (~ .'.~:: ~:j ~') .~~ ~ 00/ 'eN '//1 . 31 :o-l_ 12 ~ '111i 'tZ ~:>S ;;;j /J~ '" 'P.;1.J' f I, OSy .S'!h"'t'r.'."'L,'";:;~. :"~:-~:"'--~",".-~ ..~.,>~-~--..,.",:!,:,,"-, ,..~~-~-~ ;":~-~"'-"'i.F-~'~~':i:~~.~...........i_~-'~'~':":~_~~"?C.:--;c;~,"",~.mo~"'!:~"",~.~",,,,~.,;,~,,~~,..~,.~,. . -.~;,'-':::-~~n'~;,:~'.~, (Revised 1/99) Petition Number Date Received ...'~.., " :~. Amount Received. ($50 residential - $150 other) '.. PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 2'\ 3lo Q~ \ ~e. )\J Dr-tVl 2. BZA Petition Date 3. TAVA W4WillrkrV\s Name .k9~ fD ~J.JJ:Ai , Iw e. Address (P/;).-7'1 J -03Q, Business Phone No . L:cld~ \)~ ~~ City/State/Zip . .. ?/~3 - S";'&J-q~97 Home Phone Petitioner: 4. If petitioner is not owner otall property involved in this petition, please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: X Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . . . . 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. ~e. tlt't (611 of pf()f"€lt\{ &Pdoett- ~~~h P,.~(-t4 Lil\Je ~~l'l\q &~c:.e IsMb ot\\\I 31 fv'"eM LA~e.. &.f~ ~~-e. M~g" . 0; I ""t 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). . . " Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship-which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. . .'~ ' . 10. . . of, . ' , -". , ." A' current or usable survey of the property mustbe attached.' jPr~sed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- . '. . '.' " . '.. '.' . . '.' ~ tered'-Iclnd surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota., The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the surv,ey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. . UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. The applicant will need to obtain t e signatures of all adjacent property owners. This includes all properties abutting the applicant's property and directly across the street. If on a corner, this . means across both streets. NOTE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:. This petition is application for waiver of Ordinance(s) of the City Zoning Code. Please be aware of any possible effect the granting of this waiver could have on your property. All property owners adjacent to the subject property will receive a notice of the Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, at which they may present their views. Your signature is required only to verify that you have been told about the request and gives the adjacent property owner opportunity to comment. (Comments can contain language of agreeing with the project, objecting to the project or other statements regarding the project.) Signature ~ ~.t:/ Print Name IflIlI!.K. Ai 0-01<.D$ Y . Address ;;Zqo 7 ~ ?...L'. . Comment Signature Address .. /L- IWblJlJ.i )..1of(,pf Comment Address ea -r Spo--r11c,0 wO((IC / AJ @w5rflUC((Q,.) /WtJv$#Y I Loo 1:5 ANt- TD uS ' "' Signature b/~1ft.-- Address ~q]-'S Ci{fl~tL fJUtc~ . ; . . . ~ 4Ww' l.W. WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC. JACK W. WILLIAMS 2936 Quail ALienue North. Golden Valley, MN 55422 E-mail. Jwwill@2z.nct 7.) Using existing slab of garage. The slab of the existing garage is in great condition and I do not want the expense of removing and replacing it. At the inspection department, there is a permit from 1950, which allowed the original garage to be built. 9.) The hardships below are my reasons to grant a waiver to build on the existing slab: Mature apple tree in my yard will not allow me to move the driveway to line up with the garage. Driveway will not line up with garage door. Landscape that exists along with a shed that would have to be moved and redesigned in order to accommodate restructuring the yard for a new garage. My yard is one of the smallest yards on my block because of the curve in the street. The rear lot width is 12- feet less than the front lot width. The utilities (cable, phone, NSP) were buried in my yard, along north lot line to my house. No other utility work should be needed on my property. Jack Williams 2936 Quail Avenue N Golden Valley, MN 55422 Minneapolis license '06159 State License #20125107 . I ~ LO o ~ I 0> I / Co ~ - LO ~ I II I ~j- I II I II I II I II / I If~-'-""'- I I ~ I - ~ I .' CD . I 14 0> I it> C\I b , 0> 7.0 x 9-0 9'-7 1/8" .'-9 1/4' Garage 716 sq ft Jack W. Williams 2936 Quail Ave N. Golden Valley, MN 55422 J.W. Williams Const, Inc. 2936 Quail Ave N. Golden Valley, MN 55422 Lic. # 20125107 64" x 54" 18'-2 1/8" =l 48" x 54" fI ~t '{ ~o II II II Iii CD I ! .' o I'.' i ~ il' II I I I II I I I -L~ I II I I, ~ i.......... -II~ I ~ II I :' ~ CD II I ;; I ~ II I 6 II I I II I I I I om. ---'n I ~ 48" x 54"------1 m i / ; ---t-...-...- :.. i I ~ I ('I) Ii ..- i ..- I ..- I I I I 7 1 I .J _-1____1-:' I 7"4" x 9-0 . i I I i -' ~ ..- I _._ _ _ I I / ,,; 7' 4" X 9-0 --- ///0' / / / 3-0 x 6-8 ( " . . . \ \ \ . . . ~~ ~ ~ ~ . . . ~~ ~ ~ ~ . . . v\ ~. t ; ~\ ~ ~ . . . omG. ~ Owner I ',. At"'ite~~_ _ _ . '. . '.. '..~ j. Offi.e 01 the B,wding Inspector. .BuUde' W ~ ~ .j)~ ~ Golden Valley, Minn. PROPOSED LOCATION OF BUILDING BUIl~DI~ l>E ltl\ 11'1' VILLAGE OF~OLDEN V ALLEY N'!. 995 .':ft;~:(1 ~~~~~.\ f\.Z W.U-~Z:::;s~~~ ' 1 '~:.~;J. q 3~ . DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING I ,;.] 1~K"'.: ..-'~' ~,,, rd'" I s~" I M.._mCoM~' "'VUllO "'.""'61", To Be Completed \ . &"~"d ..., No. Cu. Ft. I Fee ..',/> g/ /(; //1. ~ / !'IS' ./)..,~h1~ I~ J?/ /~, Hl / ,NumberolCk.wte !t~tfJ~;J ELECfRICAL . Number of Outlets' .., , Motor. . . N~berolFmm'.. !f~.t,",'. :.:J'BlNG Type .1 Sew"'g' Insp...l ~. , '. Remarks J . 1.ff: /~ ' tP-r.I Pennission is hereby granted t . to .. M ~ the building oundation described in the above etatement. This permit is granted upon t Ie express condition tlllLt the pcrson to wholll it is granted, and his agents, cllIl,loyces and workmen, in all thc work e in,around and UJlon said building, or any part thereo(, shall con(orm in all respects to the ordinances o( the Village o( Golden Valley, regarding the construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and removal buildings within the Village limits; and this permit lDay be revoked at any time upon violation o( allY of the provisions o( said ordinances. , . ....j AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT" cl In consideration of the issue and delivery to me by the ViI1age Building Inspector. of the Village of Golden Valley of the above permit, I hereby agree to do the proposed .r , work in accordance with th. e description above set f?rth ~n~ according to t!le provisions of th.e ordinances of the Village. of Golflen V~rJ' being first duly sworn, I hereby' . ,j state and Slty that the facts stated by me and con tamed In the above permit are true as herem. stated. .. . ~-- '/)j '" '. -) . , " Subscribed and sworn to before me at Golden Valley, Minn'esota, this .. ,/ t day of. . ~ ViII.g. Cll" i . . j 1 , I I j j " . This permit is issued subject ~ the approval of the ., . plans and specifications. Do not~tart cOfstruction until . your plans h8Y6'been approved - \ Approve '4..t... Building Inspector. I " . . . BJII.Dli~G PEa.o:T W1lko:vp, Inc. DaC6111ber 29) 19$0 :Pd'~ ~ 'a. ~ -=:5- ~ -~ h :.~ _d?_~ -e?~ ,-<<'~~ -/. / ./ Fr'.I1D8 GaNge $700.00 W. A. VUkinspn (Signat.ll1"e) See ;\>25 }Joble Avenue North tor original permit #l88Z. ley . 11-15-00 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 2936 Quail Avenue North Jack Williams Jack Williams, with property located at 2936 Quail Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for two variances from the Residential zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a new garage in the same location as the existing garage, which will be demolished. This construction project will require variances from the following section of City Code. . Section 11.21, Subd. 12 (A) Accessory Buildings. City Code states that the required yard setback for any accessory building . shall be 5 feet from any lot boundary. The property owner is requesting a variance for a garage to be constructed 4.5 feet from the rear yard property line and 4.4 feet from the side yard property line. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, November 28, 2000, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Adjacent properties require notification. . r - - - -30- - --l I f THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 3 FEET OF LOT 10-""\ , , S B'\ 02f22" \H __"44.76-- I (\\ L_V I - - - - ;.... /TfOU@Y\~ l.Q!0R~ I --- \ ~ ~ ~ I -- I 10 ICi ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C!! -- , , , .... - THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOU TH ERL Y 3 FEET. OF LOT 9 p..pp\.E. iRE.E. - _ _ _ - -38.7- - - - -- 5 ~ Q.. ..-(" \ G \ \..' \ 6.6" ~ \ CI'. ..., 'i \ ...,. t- ~ \ ..._'47.52-'" -- __ ~ 77"'1't5,;' E. . . II Ii --- r - CORNER OF SHED 1.7' I NORTHEAST OF PROPERTY LINE I I () .J ,,- FOUND PINCH- TOP IRON ; 1.3' NORTH AND 2.0' EASl OF PROPERTY CORNER ------ \ " \ trEND OF WOOD FENCE \ ,--,. " ,/ I' .... '--' . 8325 - 8459'Tenth Avenue North 00-10-49 Steiner Development . Hey Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) To: \ Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Dan Olson, City Planner Subject: 8325 - 8459 Tenth Avenue North (Map 21) (00-10-49) Steiner Development, Applicant Date: November 20,2000 Steiner Development, with property located at 8325 - 8459 Tenth Avenue North, is requesting three variances from the Light Industrial zoning code (Section 11.35). The applicant is requesting variances from the parking requirements, east side yard building setback requirements, and the west side green space requirements. These variances would bring the existing building site into conformance with current Zoning Code requirements. The eOllOwing are the requested variances: . · The first requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.35, Subd. 6 (A) and (B), which relate to parking requirements. Based on the office square footage of 15,970 square feet, and the warehouse square footage of77, 990 the total number of required parking spaces is 220. The site currently provides for 163 spaces. The applicant is applying for a variance to reduce the parking requirement of 220 parking spaces to 163 parking spaces. · The second requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (A), which requires a building setback of 35 feet along Wisconsin Avenue and also requires this setback area to be landscaped green area. The applicant is requesting to reduce this 35- foot building setback requirement to 21.2 feet. · The third requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (C) (4), which requires one-half (1/2) ofthe required side yard setback area to be landscaped, planted, and maintained as a buffer zone. The required building setback is 20 feet. Therefore, 10 feet of this area is to be landscaped as a buffer zone. The applicant is requesting to reduce this required landscaped buffer zone to 6 feet. According to the property survey submitted by the applicant, the building lies 105 feet from the "edge of the water" for Bassett Creek. Zoning Code Section 11.65, Subd. 5 (A) requires buildings to be set back 50 feet from the "Ordinary High Water Mark" (OHWM) of the Creek. Although the OHWM is not marked on the survey, staff is satisfied that the building meets the setback from the Creek. The City's file on this property reveals that a permit was pulled in November of 1970 for the construction of the .building. No other pertinent information was found in the file. 'eM I ;nn-" , :;; I ~ =- .~ .: .' ~ I on Q :j Cl:l .1 ZIl.8& :0;---' 2 · on ~ 1..005 IIV.'H 1~.04' 100.4 -~ ._.~~ .,~,... S!f loo.~ II 100.+ I 4~13~\ I I 6 .. ~. =. I- r" I~ ... i~ ACIRES 9 \ 11'.2 - - II '.i'l~ ~~ ~~. fr-r_.~ ~lc *'}, ",. J._ - -~.: 'f"oor- N J1Q .....: I.. . . .. .. .~ ~ '" ?2 . Subject Property: 8325 10'" Avenue North Steiner Development, Applicant . .- . .ll''& ~h,. ... .__._._-~ "1"- ~ --," \ !MID . VALLEY 10 110. Zl> ~1I"l1 OI"lC. "'.~- C ~.. .. '.. ' 1.1\'\." . A.l"l"'l~~ .., ..... A' "1.'1 tc.f~ \0\\\\\ ..o'1.',t.Cio (llo,t,'. to.~..~.~~.\\ ,w.'.' 6\\.\1 It ...1l . sQU ~~~ ~I I I' ~ I ~ v ''I; "~J 1\ 2 .t'''l"~_. . 3f : .._ I "0.. ,. R iJ '~ ~'H;"~' I ~ .'J': ; .'*~I \ ' I I 2 z 0 (.) m.t' '2.~\O ~ pr.oO\~\O~ ,_ _ _ ~J!.- -,'--- . tW' i 110 I B E' C 3 ~I 2 ~\~ I .....,Jt :'C',;~:- I't' . . ""I ~, I' 't.o V' . ~i~ ,.-. .. ....~~~i\ ...,e,f:',-,..,I "~"'.: 'r-' :..,... I iY ,; '. .... ..., I.... U' ,. . .. , : '- - Ji ,..--..,..... ~r . . Steiner Development, Inc. 3610 County Road 101 Wayzata, MN 55391 (952)473-5650 Fax (952)473-7058 November 9,2000 Mark Grimes Director of Planning and Development City of Golden Valley Golden Valley MN 55426 RE: 8325 - 8459 Tenth Avenue North Dear Mark: . As an attachment to our Board of Zoning Appeals variance request enclosed is the Note to Adjacent Property Owners. Steiner Development is requesting an East property line building setback variance and a West property line green space variance. Weare requesting these variances as part of our due diligence in purchasing the building. The creation of Wisconsin Avenue after the building was built and improvements to the parking lot have created a need for these requests. The creation of these variances will allow the title work and mortgage placement to occur in a timely manner. Thank you for your cooperation. Copy: Dave Distad . (Revised 1/99) Petition Number . Date Received Amount Received ($50 r'esidential - $150 other) PETITION FOR ORDINANCE WAIVER CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1. Street address of property involved in this petition: 6pj-:J:- f;~!J-~ 1F#17 $e- III BZA Petition Date / / / g; /c:J CJ Petitioner: -::5/&/!;u-- ZJ#1/.e,.& p/#ew T N / amjtb/~ .5. a ~ /0/ 4/;/le-.J;;//kz /f;/~3?jf Address City/State/Zip 4r14;?-3 - ~27 . Business Phone Home Phone 2. 3. 4. If petitioner is not owner of all property involved in this petition. please name property owner and describe petitioner's interest (legal and other) in this property: &Y/&l W~J7 Uo 5. Legal Description of property involved in this petition (found on survey): UJTN/ g'~~W~tWd?~ ~H l:' '--,' ----<"r ,,";' G ,\ -7 \.-'7:....>-f-~- ,-...::.. \\. '- 1 L- \-.- ...~ -.' -l \ 6. Type of property involved in this petition: Residential: _ Single Family _ Double Dwelling _ Multiple Dwelling Industrial K Commercial Institutional Bus. & Prof. Office Other . e e 7. Detailed description of building (s), addition(s), and alteration(s) involved in this petition. The site plans and drawings submitted with this petition will be the basis of any variance that may be approved and cannot be changed before or after the building permit issued. ~ff~/I4~ BtIi'~~-~~fi ~e q)pmrldJ~ ~/~/J .puo~ ~ ~iMce 8. (Staff will complete this item) Waiver of Section Subd(s). Subd(s). Subd(s). Waiver of Section Waiver of Section 9. Please attach a brief statement of the reasons. necessity. or hardship which provide grounds for the granting of this waiver. Attach letter, photographs, or other evidence, if appropriate. 10. A current or usable survey of the property must be attached. Proposed surveys are not acceptable. The survey must be prepared by a regis- tered land surveyor licensed in the State of Minnesota. The survey must show all property lines. buildings. and streets. The distance from the house and all other buildings to the front and side property lines shall be shown. The rear distance of any buildings from the property line will be needed. if in question. Also. the survey should show an approximate location of any buildings on adjacent properties relative to the side(s) where the construction will take place. If the survey is larger than 11" x 17". the applicant will supply seven additional copies of the survey for use by the Board. 11. To the Applicant: To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. Attached herewith is my check in the amount of $ representing the Board of Zoning Appeals Application Fee. e. UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OR THE: ACTION APPLICABLE TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST, IF GRANTED, IS NOT TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAR, THE WAIVER EXPIRES. 'k2c :i:~::: c~~ Address \ Print Name AlAN 1:>b{)~J ON Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment Signature Print Name Comment: Signature Print Name Comment Signature ~ 7 j- L,z'-n r ~JR 0 ~w Address tsll 1% Itvi.- {U. ~ ~U'1"..#f:Y~/~; Address t5~6:t .?tJ~ ~./~ ./U ~<flk:P/ IU~ p~ ~ ~Ut/0?~4Y~~ Address -G31t::J/tJ~ ~t/t: /V Address Address . . . . - - - - ~ -- - . .... - ... .......... ........... "2 . U . v u u ~u"uu~.n J)nvnLVr~l'\ll 11'\lL;. ~005 .' ~ Date: September 18, 2000 To: Dave Distad Jerry Steiner FAX: 952 938 7670 ...iif "'! RE: Prudential Industrial Purchase Parking Requirements From: Fred Richter ~ .,......----................. .---' . ... . .."""'...-....:........."-":... ..............~ ........._.."*"jIoLl'....- ......, ......... ..~,~'....,-,._,. ........... 8325 - 845-~~enth Ave North. Golden Valley ~ '" The survey indicates a total parking count of 152. The City of Golden Valley Code for Light Industrial Zoning requires 4/1000 for office and 2/1000 for warehouse, storage and light manufacturing. Based on 93.960SF of occupied/gross area of which 17% is office the required parking is: " \ Office 15,970 SF = 64 Warehouse 77,990 SF =,156 Total Required = 220 -- 6815 Shady Oak Road, Eden Prairie The survey indicates a total parking count of 152. The City of Eden Prairie for Industrial Zoning requires 5/1000 for office .5/1000 for warehouse and 3/1 000 for manufacturing. Based on 90,000SF of occupied/gross area of which 16,306SF is office and 73,694SF warehouse the required parking is: Office 16,306 = 82 Warehouse 73,694 = 37 Total Required = 119 6820 - 6840 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center The survey indicates a total of342 spaces at 6820 and 269 spaces at6840. The City of Brooklyn Center I - 1 Zoning requires 5/1000 for office and 1.25/1000 for manufacturing and warehouse. Based on 146,870 SF of-occupied / gross area for 6820 and 112,748 SF'occupied I gross area for 6840 the required parking is: 6820 Office 15,638SF = 78 Warehouse 131 ,232SF = 164 Total Required = 242 6840 Office 10,890 SF = 55 Warehouse 101,858 SF = 127 Total Required = 182 ley . 11-17 -00 HEARING NOTICE Board of Zoning Appeals 8325 - 8459 Tenth Avenue North Steiner Development Steiner Development, with property located at 8325 - 8459 Tenth Avenue North, has petitioned the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals for three variances from the Light Industrial zoning district. The applicant is proposing to bring the existing office/warehouse building into conformance with Zoning Code regulations. The building requires variances from the following section of City Code. · The first requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.35, Subd. 6 (A) and (B), which relate to parking requirements. The applicant would like to reduce the parking requirement of 220 parking spaces to 163 parking spaces, which now exist on the . property. · The second requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (A), which requires a building setback of 35 feet along Wisconsin Avenue and also requires this setback area to be landscaped green area. The applicant is requesting to reduce this 35-foot building setback requirement to 21.2 feet. · The third requested variance is from Zoning Code Section 11.35, Subd. 7 (C) (4), which requires one-half (1/2) of the required side yard setback area to be landscaped, planted, and maintained as a buffer zone. The required building setback is 20 feet. Therefore, 10 feet of this area is to be landscaped as a buffer zone. The applicant is requesting to reduce this required landscaped buffer zone to 6 feet. This petition will be heard at a regular meeting to be held Tuesday, November 28, 2000, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. . Adjacent properties require notification.