04-22-91 PC Agenda �
#
a
i
�
• ;
GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION �`
Regular Meeting �
�
�
�
GOLDEN VALLEY CITY HALL �
;
Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road h
Golden Valley, Minnesota �:
�.
April 22, 1991 ��
7:OOP.M. 31
�
4
§
i:
AGENDA �:
�.
�
�
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 8, 1991 (Will be mailed Friday, April 19th �
or available the night of the Planning Commission meeting. ) �
�
#
II. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 53 }
�
Applicant: SuperAmerica Group, Inc. ;
�
• Address: 2580 Hillsboro Avenue ::
:�
Request: Allow Gasoline Sales and Storage �
�.
�
a
III. UPDATE OF VALLEY SQUARE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN - REVIEW AND APPROVAL
�
IV. REVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION ATTENDANCE ';
�
V. REPORTS ON MEETINGS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CITY `
COUNCIL AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS �
;
�
i:
VI. OTHER BUSINESS >
;
,
VII. ADJOURNMENT �
�
� �
{
�
�
�
MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION
� April 8, 1991
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden V alley City
H al l , Counci 1 Ch amber, 7800 Gol den V al l ey Road, Gol den V al l ey, Mi nnesota. The
meeting was called to order by Chair McAleese at 7:05p.m.
Those present were: Johnson, Kapsner, Lewis, McAleese, McCracken-Hunt and
Prazak. Also present were Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development;
Beth Knoblauch, City Planner and Mary Dold, Secretary.
I. Approval of Minutes - March 11, 1991
MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, seconded Lewis and motion carried unanimously to
approve the March 11, 1991 minutes as submitted.
II. Informal Public Hearing - Amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 49
Applicant: Airborne Express
Address: 830 Boone Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota
� Request: Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion
of a terminal for package delivery service in the Light
Industrial Zoning District.
Chair McAleese introduced this agenda item and asked Beth Knoblauch, City
Planner, for a brief summary of the request. Ms. Knoblauch stated that when
Airborne came before the Planning Commission late last year, plans were already
on the board for an expansion to the terminal portion of the building, but the
company had not provided sufficient detail at an early enough date to consider
the expansion. Airborne is requesting an amendment to its CUP so that an exten-
sion of almost 55 feet at the east end of the terminal area with a new loading
dock extending about 30 feet east of that. The new loading dock will face
north, away from the nearby Mallard Creek apartments. The expansion appears to
meet all zoning requirements. The ten factors were reviewed and recommendation
for approval was given by staff.
Commissioner McCracken-Hunt asked about the number of handicapped parking spaces
on the site. Chair McAleese asked if the City had received any complaints from
Mallard Creek residents. Beth Knoblauch commented regarding complaints and said
that none had been reported that the Planning Department is aware of.
Roger Johnson, representative for Airborne responded to Commissioner McCracken-
Hunt's question concerning handicapped parking. He stated that when the plan
was reviewed by Jay Ipsen, from Inspections, it was noticed that the plan did
not note the handicapped parking space on the south side of the parking area and
will be put in a revised plan.
� Chair McAleese opened the Informal Public Hearing. Seeing and hearing no one
Chair McAleese closed the Informal Public Hearing.
Minutes of the Golden V alley Planning Commission
April 8, 1991
P age Two
� Beth Knobl auch commented that al l recommendations remained the same except for
No. 1 and No. 2 which stated that the site plan dated March 11, 1991 shall be
made a part of the approved permit along with the floor plan and elevation
sketches.
MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Prazak and motion carried unanimously to
recommend to the City Council approval to amend the Conditional Use Permit,
Airborne Express, Applicant.
III. Informal Public Hearin - Amend Zonin Code/Com rehensive Land Use Plan
�
Applicant: U.S. West NewVector Group, Inc./City of Golden Valley
Address: Southwest Corner of Brookview Park, Golden Valley, MN
Request: Amend zoning code from Institutional I-4 to a Radio and
Television Zoning District and amend the Comprehensive
Land Use P1 an Map
Chair McAleese asked Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development to give a
brief summary of this request. Mr. Grimes stated US West Newl/ector Group, Inc.
approached the City requesting to lease a portion of the southwest corner of the
� Brookview Golf Course to construct a monopole tower for cellular phone trans-
mission and a 36' x 12' building which would house the necessary equipment that
goes along with the tower. The proposed tower and building would not physically
interfere with the operation of the course. Access would be from General Mills
Blvd. and used by golf course vehicles and US West. Mr. Grimes commented US
West designed a building that would "fit in" with the golf course environment
and would do landscaping to screen the building as much as possible. The pole
is proposed to be 90 ft. and would blend in with other light poles along I-394
and the poles holding up the net for the driving range. The area would be
fenced with a security type chain link fence to prevent access from the site.
The City is proposing to lease the property to US West contingent on zoning
approval , which would take place before the lst consideration of the City
Council . The lease is for five years with four - five year extensions (25 years
total ). The funds from the rent will go to the golf course. Staff recommends
approval and noted the five findings found in the staff report dated April 3,
1991.
Commissioner Lewis asked how the City would benefit by US West's request and has
another site been looked at in Golden Valley. Mr. Grimes stated that the City
would not benefit from this rezoning and US West could comment on another site
in Golden Valley.
Commissioner Praz ak asked about the height of the monopole. Mr. Grimes stated
the pole would be approximately 100 ft.
Commissioner Lewis asked about interference with the helicopter at KARE 11 and
• Mr. Grimes stated that the helicopter has a different landing pattern and the
monopole would not interfere.
Chair McAleese asked if the City Council had approved the lease. Mr. Grimes
stated the lease is contingent on the zoning changes.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
April 8, 1991
Page Three
� Commissioner McCracken-Hunt commented on setting a precedent of using park land
for leasing of property. Mr. Grimes commented he couldn't imagine anything else
for use on park land.
David L arson, representative for US West NewVector Group, Inc. , talked about the
increasing demand by customers for cellular phones and in turn the need for
additional monopoles. He talked about the size of the building, roof line, and
the monopole height. There are limited sites available along Hwy. 169 and
going east on I-394. In the search area General Mills has most of the available
land but does not want to tie this land up on a long-term basis.
David Hellerman, Project Manager for US West stated that they are working with
the Department of Transportation but is taking a long time to work things out.
Commissioner Kapsner asked if the Interchange Building would be appropriate to
put a pole -- Mr. Hellerman stated that this would be too high.
Chair McAleese asked about the pole height and Mr. Hellerman stated that it
would be approximately 100' which included a whip antenna that could be lowered.
Chair McAleese also asked if the City turns this request down what alternatives
would they have. Mr. Hellerman stated they would have to look for alternatives
that there are customers to be served.
Chair McAleese asked about break-ins and problems if a tower would f all down.
� Mr. Hellerman stated the building is monitored 24 hrs. a day and there have been
no problems. He has never heard of a tower falling that engineers look at ice
and wind problems.
Chair McAleese opened the Informal Public Hearing.
Mr. Chuck Burmeister, 6038 Golden Valley Road, commented he felt that this use
was not consistent with a park use -- commercial usage does not fit on park
1 and.
Commissioner Lewis asked if the building which was presented at the March 25,
1991 Open space and Recreation Commission meeting was approved. Mr. Burmeister
stated it was not appropriate.
Chair McAleese asked staff if the Park Board would be asked to come forth at the
City Council meeting -- Mr. Grimes stated yes.
Chair McAleese closed the Informal Public Hearing.
Commissioner Prazak commented on establishing a precedent for use of park space.
Commissioner McCracken-Hunt stated there will be pressure put on cities and
those areas where towers must be put on to serve customers. Park land is sacred
-- no objection to cellular phones but not on park land.
Commissioner Kapsner commented that the southeast corner is unique -- with the
• I-394 wall with lights, activity going on 24 hrs. Feels there would be no
visual effect. Looking into the area from Brookview Clubhouse would see a
building with greenery vs. at present, the wall .
Minutes of the Golden V alley Planning Commission
April 8, 1991
P age Four
� Commissioner Johnson agreed with Commissioner Prazak that this land should
remain park land and the request to rezone is not consistent with the present
usea
Commissioner Lewis cannot support the request to use park land for commercial
use.
Chair McAleese is against the proposal but feels that there is a strong possi-
bility that the Planning Commission recommendation will be overlooked when the
proposal comes before the City Council . Feels it is bad City policy to take
park land except for a higher and better purpose.
MOVED by McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Lewis and motion carried with a vote of 5
yea and 1 nay to recommend to the City Council denial of the request for an
amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map from Municipal Park to Indus-
trial and an amendment to the Zoning Code from I-4 to Radio and Television.
IV. Informal Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit No. 52
Applicant: Systems Control
Address: Standard Oil 3rd Addition, Golden Valley, Minnesota
O Request: Allow for a motor vehicle emissions testing station in
an Industrial Zoning District
Chair McAleese asked staff for a brief summary of the request. Mark Grimes,
Director of Planning and Development, reviewed his staff report to the Planning
Commission pointing out that this program is to begin July 1, 1991. One area of
concern is the traffic which would be generated looking at 708 cars a day being
served at a maximum waiting time of 15 minutes. If it takes more than 15
minutes, an alternative must be found. Another concern was pollution on the
site -- Systems Control has approval by the PCA noting no problems visible.
Chair McAleese asked about a traffic study at lOth and Boone. Mr. Grimes com-
mented that after talking with the City Engineer, Lowell Odland, the traffic
situation would be okay.
Dennis Palmer, representative from Systems Control , gave a slide presentation
showing the building and how it is used, how cars would come in and out and the
landscaping. He talked about stacking of cars and if a problem develops, it
would be looked at and corrected. We are working with the Department of Trans-
portation on signage so people will know which way to enter from Hwy. 169 and
other roads.
Chair McAleese opened the Informal Public Hearing. Seeing and hearing no one
Chair McAleese closed the Informal Public Hearing.
Planning Commission consensus was that it was a good use for the site and access
� to the site should be good. Chair McAleese agreed with the findings of staff
but is concerned with traffic on lOth and Boone.
Minutes of the Golden V alley Planning Commission
April 8, 1991
Page Five
• MOVED by Kapsner, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to recom-
mend approval to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a
vehicle emission testing station on Lot 2, Block 1, Standard Oil 3rd Addition
noting the seven conditions outlined in the memo to the Planning Commission
dated April 4, 1991.
V. Re orts on Meetin s of the Housin and Redevelo ment Authorit Cit
ounci an Boar o oning ppea s
No reports were given.
VI. Other Business
No other business was presented.
VII. Adjournment
Chair McAleese adjourned the meeting at 9:25p.m.
• Jean Lewis, Secretary
.
,
MEMORANDUM
�
DATE: April 189 1991
T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission
FROM: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
SUBJECTe CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW GASOLINE SALES AT THE SUPERAMERICA
STORE, 2580 HILLSBORO AVENUE, SUPERAMERICA GROUP, INC., APPLICANT
SuperAmerica Group (SA) is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in order
that their existing store at 2580 Hillsboro may sell gasoline. Within the
Commercial Zoning District, gasoline service stations require a Conditional Use
Permit in order to insure that gas sales can work on a particular site.
The SuperAmerica store is located at the north end of the Sunny Hollow Shopping
Center. The SA store was previously a 7-11. (Several years ago, SA bought out
many of the 7-11 stores in the area.) The store is relatively small -- about
2400 sq.ft. SA is now looking at each of its stores in the metro area that do
not sell gas to determine if it is possible to add gas sales. If gas sales is
not possible, the store may be closed. As the attached letter dated 3/28/91
� from SA architect, Michael McDonnell states, "The addition of a one-sided gas
island would increase customer flow by 40q to 840 customers a day." (Currently
they have about 600 customers a day.) He also states in the letter that many
customers have asked for gas sales at that location and that people expect SA to
sell gase
The Sunny Hollow Shopping Center is small . The total building area of the
center is 14,800 sq.ft. or about 2 acres. The site currently has 113 parking
spaces. According to a site plan submitted to the City in 1983, the site
exceeds the retail parking requirement of one space for each 150 sq.ft. of floor
area (99 total space� required). This building is occupied by a number of dif-
ferent uses permitted in the Commercial Zoning District including retail ,
restaurant and office. The most restrictive parking requirement for this site
is to apply the retail parking requirement of one space for each 150 sq.ft. over
the entire building. This allows the owner to use the building for any retail
use at any time.
The building currently meets all setback requirements and landscape require-
mentse The proposed pumps and canopy will also meet setback requirements.
The staff's major concern regarding this proposal is congestion near the gas
pumps. There is the potential for congestion between the pump island and the
parking area in front of the SA store. If it is assured that two cars are
filling up at the pump and one or two cars are waiting north of the pumps, there
is inadequate driveway width between the cars parked in front of the SA and the
• cars(s) stacked behind the cars getting gas. I have calculated that there would
be less than 20 ft. of space for a two-way drive. This is just not enough
space, especially where there are cars pulling in and backing out of parking
spaces in front of the SA. The minimum two-way driveway width is 20 ft, and it
is preferred to be 24 ft. (See attached drawing.)
P age Two
With a one sided pump there will also be cars approaching from the Hillsboro •
driveway from the west and wanting to wait for a pump. This would also cause
problems because of the lack of a stacking area. Most likely cars would stack
in the driveway from Hillsboro Avenuee
The staff has considered suggesting to the center owner a one-way pattern within
the center in order to minimize conflicts. However, it was decided that this
would be difficult to enforce, and, therefore may complicate matters.
I am also concerned about the delivery of gas and other products to the site and
how it can be done without affecting access to and within the site.
Findings
1. Demonstrated Need for the Pro osed Use. SA has identified that there is a
eman or gas sa es at t is ocation. If there is a market for such a
use, the City policy is to then accept that there is a demonstrated needm
2. Consistenc with the Com rehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates
this area or commercia uses. Gas stations are consistent with the com-
mercial designation.
3. Effect U on Pro ert Values in the Nei hborhood. This is a convenience
s opping center whic is suppose to attract customers. There are other
large commercial traffic generators in the area (McOonald's, gas station
and convenience stores). Gas pumps at this site is not out of character �
with the area. Because this use is consistent with the area, I do not
believe it would reduce property values in the area.
The owner of the shopping center told me she discussed the gas pur�p with
the other tenants in the shopping center. The tenants all agree that gas
sales would help the center by increasing traffic.
4. Effect of an Antici ated Traffic Generation u on Current Traffic Flow and
on estion in t e rea. S has estimated t at t is store wit gas wi
increase tra ic from 600 clients to 840 clients per day. This increase
would not adversely affect the local street system. However, the staff
believes that there is not enough room to place the one-sided pumps on this
site. With even minimal stacking of one or two vehicles for the gas pumps,
from cars coming fram either direction, congestion will occuro The two-way
driveway in front of the SA store would be reduced to about 17 ft. in
width with only one car stacked from the north. Cars backing out of the
spaces in front of the store with this narrow space for two-way traffic
would cause difficulties.
The staff is also concerned about the operation of the driveway off
Hillsboro Avenue with the gas pumps. If a driver desires to use the gas
pumps after entering from Hillsboro and the pump island is full , the driver
will likely wait in the driveway causing access problems from Hillsboroo
In addition, there is concern regarding the delivery of gas and other pro� �
ducts to the store with the reduced driveway area in front of the store.
When gas is delivered, access from Medicine Lake Road would be severely
restricted. This may also happen when one or more delivery trucks stops in
front of the store.
i
Page Three
• 5. Increase in Po ulation and Densit u on Surroundin Area. The use will not
increase t e popu ation or density of t e area.
6o Increase in Noise Levels Caused b the Pro osed Use. There would be a
minimal increase in no�se leve s due to more tra ic coming to the site.
7. An� Odors Dust, Smoke, Gas or Vibration to be Caused by the Use. This use
wou�d not cause a signi ic^ant increase in t ese actors. A type stations
• do not cause complaints about these matters.
8. An Increase in Flies, Rates, Vermin and other Animals Caused b the Use.
No increase is expected i proper sanitation aci ities are mainta�ne .
9. Visual Appearance of the Pro osed Structure or Use. The shopping center
wiT c ange y t e construction o t e gas pumps and canopy. Due to the
nature of the commercial area, this construction would, not have a negative
impact in the area.
l0e An Other Effect U on the General Public Health, Safet and Welfare of the
Cit and its Resi ents. T e staff be ieves t at the interna circu ation
of the SA store wit gas pumps will not be able to operate without problems
for the users of the shopping center. Although the tenants of the shopping
center are positive about the increased traffic from gas pumps at SA, the
staff believes that this site is not large enough to handle even a one-side
• pump operatione
Recommendation
The staff does not recommend approval of this Conditional Use Permit to allow
gas pumps at the SA station at 2580 Hillsboro. The staff believes that there is
inadequate room on the site to accommodate the necessary room for access to the
store and stacking for the pumps. There is also a concern about how much room
is available for the delivery of gas and other products to the SA store and
other stores in the shopping center.
If the Planning Commission so chooses to recommend approval of gas pumps at this
location, the staff recommends the following conditions:
1. The plan for gas pumps and tanks be approved by the Fire Marshalo
2. The canopy over the pumps cannot extend into any required building set-
backs.
3. The parkirrg area for two employee parking spaces north of the pumps must be
clearly marked for "employees only" in order to minimize the use of those
spaces.
4. The shopping center owner and SA shall provide a signage plan to guide cars
and trucks in the area to minimize conflictse
� 5o The use shall meet all applicable City, State and Federal regulationso
.
P age Four
6. Failure to comply with any of the terms of this permit may be cause for its
revocation. •
MWG:mkd
attachmentse Location Map
Site Plans
Letter from Mr. Michael 0'Donnell dated 3/28/91
Letter from Jean & Anthony Ouellette dated 4/1/91
�
i
` 1�,'" � '
CITY OF G�LDEN VALLEY
�
•�=:. 266.72 .., '.669.10- ..Zo ch.Gev�. - ...•• Z6lb.4i Res.-..
... N89°S7 11"E 26 R o 730
� ' ......
� j _ 9co.s a_ � 93/S Z��iR. • �;".. 2Gg R. T
,. �' , .. �7S •.' �09 � ' 9/43 S i 9 05... 910�iC_
� . b `an',3 Q e�'9 p � I
�'s, .W�. ` ^N p °'� O o � � f PROPOSED SITE
c�, h� ;'Y o Q 0. � t' '�'
o r�ry �M1 y � • � • m � � • � I � � �
� N
'� 22Y7J � � � I �
� �°n w Y�r .vo J ' � i
� O1 ' � -�'Z ' r '� o
C� � - W �aI M
� a�Z 2 ,� 3 � q a� � i � .
a J�`r q^' :,� '
G Q n�O v � '
ryh�a�R 278.879~ =a g'1^r►
q• �L=239.06 V
� ti� • '�11/OB6Y?��? . ���� S89°36�45��E ', - Z6 �.
ICS a�n e•9y {1�1% 4 �I4.86 i6L50 10 R.
a � s° �o � �9�' S89°8C'S6'�E 591.99
: ��o s� �."' OD�I�PpT10 � �N :u
h o i /3a.z ; � T 2a _"n �: a� o �.°, M� �� �
�°�N � Q � '� °� D � OUTLOT 2 �
� 2 Zo� � a°. h 7 '► 2345�6 3 � �o
�5 A
� _^132�4• . . • 2373-85 ' ° 2i5.34 tCwN� p *0� oi 0 q y,�
.+���: c,- I � y � 6 a to NR9° 0'S6"W
� O, •��V�t ti� 2 a �O � 4��4 ry � � � � _ 312.lB ,..� ♦
_ti � Vo � r 2a � a� �j�-0 OL. I o�^ `
� N �� � ; .�'�. 2J59-7/ vp� C P�S-J �p � x 6i4.q` 6 °•-°�b
� t� z h � � �f` H)5�32 b 2°� <. ��7.9 4
� ! :
� ' � MED.LeEY �yo� N M M �o.f ?42B'32 � OUTLOT A O - .�
N • �o„ • m �_ � LANEM PU.Do ���' PA R K
d F, .re 2420-P �'N I �:
w PJtS-ST t� 233Z-68 .� ��
��1 N i Z4/?-1B 2 � K
^� N� � • —� W
3b6.4B 26030_� •v
' �. /79.99 �
"' g� 1 2 � N89 59�.. t°�iso��'� `z9%�i
, � , q 5 6 ° SoE
��.. � � 3�-/6�GLIJ c�RC� ,� K 1 N O S ° � �h��
:.'�: . +� 3/7-/5 23/3-// OJ°(�'� �I1O
'�_i :
��_'. R .� 14 3 12 11 0 9 �� 26 21 28 19 » iso .�N����
..�` ; � � N 0 '�� 58A '6 38
__....__ ri �' KINGS 19 �� 2 22 ?,�?q Zg\N�$ �'� � ;�,;p,�c
� _a �
�.: e`�c a f ••,;.�ZS �4�`F !j� �R 56 a`Y� �� 51.i1 ���$ a.
�•. vi 8 .i4G4 NO°230Z`W j° „�Fq �0 ti `� v. c�`L � sw W .rsye
ir.... � ._ ' ,�4 . 16 QN 99 9 0� S� 7 �cio y� O N 9043
�� � 8 , T \ y •'tioo
�'.' N ��M; fs� 1 5 N h pp 9 � 58 5 3 o�d° N° t-t.
�: �� . IS �5� . Iq �o � Kin:�s o� s9 �go O°` � �r
. y2 p qp � 5 y�
.o �� ? 1 Z T S�QO 1�.� ryti 22r� r. r py (i s ��' m� 36 N � n
. . .Z�:; ' `�i �5� F'y�,Z0.5 �42 0 ° ° � 9 � . q�l 2 �� o� c,a � "
� � � 6 , w s ����� 6 lla�' y N 3� : �
0
� � /l7.tl
3� 1. ;`�. 1, 141 �v�' 0 1 5 S �� 5 � N a o 7� P r
� � � ^ =�
Z N 14 p ob,a���-o0 1 � � N � �//a�.��Y 9� ,�,�o� 34 �9 � a 34° � o� o�
0 13 N Z'�� o .0 1 8 N 8 �x � � 4� , N � 1��
� 9 5
� h ,_ � 0 6 � a 3 o'l a- u
` 1 3 '°� .'�, 1 2 0 � �1 2 1 8 1 tiN '�y, 9 0 , o o+s,.o s•, ���
_ c� �1�.o �LGIM:
, � -� ' � h. ��V t
�i � 3
i � �� ' ' ' �
� q � ;. � � t � ��.,����������� ����� � ! �~�
! ���f�
<•, � � ' � � � ' ���E�� �.�!
�; _ '�e#�a ���• • i �w.
' � : tt?! ;
i . L4`�' �.=z•..:�_ \
�_ ' .... S? r+�.�JE �'�t F
t
' � t ;�•�{� t . � � f
"r� t.r.- .� 4
� � ut:.� ' ` �9 f ¢�'• °'� �. .. +
i � ���i.i��!" ??'r:.
�a �� •�.+ •�:� �'. .>� � LS: � C� ` iiTj . " �—'-' ..'.... � -•--^rv___���..�_' ._�t._...1,
' Q :� � H� ��'"Y.,���; `.'i �� �...y...ti......_...._..._._........._.._ ___... _.._._....�_. � ............_....__....,.,. _.__�._..._.___�^ .. . . ��_._.�.�__._ _
i
� � � '.t..,M.w- .ot a
� .... � � ' ; � .
_. � ` !i :
.: �. � '�t . . i E •
... ..._ _ . �i't f't s� ! t ' ���g ���� �'
ril �" � � ' 2........ .......�,. � �,.�� `� �. ... • _3,�
� •
� . ;T ,F°` � '����• T 4D.�t` � ;R� �{i�it%� ;
��... � �: , �
_...._�_._._ _ : °� ...__. ':�-�-:' ` ��._. `m...�.�.� _ ._ �``,__ --_-__ __MM__._�_._.._....w__._._�......M.�___�__._--------.'.__
� � �. ..
:;��; ; �
:,� .. �
'� � :{i f t�., �� 1� i /j��� . r� �
� , � ,�'#o�p��
� � ��� ' .
;.� �; �., � ��f' �
Y, � , , / gra � I
�► � ' :z:� -� �y �// °� !
pyZ � �, iyw t�j �, {` �^','.�.YSaAFBYk'9. ' l T f /
i y, ,� ����l�f� 1C f�1�fia � �i��� �
' *��-�� i ; �� 1
i.. �t f ��^.w��V���� ���•; �f/ , `
, ' `;? , ' ; ` �MPL YEE . —B"
�. �z�; ; ,�'
- `� '' '`r.�` PAR INQ
�4Z"' �..i_
� i � !!�,f �,��'- � .
� ` . :....�;_,-g ,�' . � `C
t9 /` /.� ;
• +i . .....�.. -'�� .._._._._ �I� _.....
�i. e. �b� ; • �--�,_
��� ; fit 7��+�'��/��� ........._. � .
# �� r�}'
� :; . ... ��,'y
;...., � ,�' >� �
�.?4 ! jt,i f7 !��d�� • ��
;'.
r .
�'b � � ,,�% p �1F`> .r�.,� ,.. � ... k. � iX':t�t
• . .
:
�_
� � .,: � .S .... � � _ _ } , .
� ,, ,a .....�, .%f� •.•�� �' _:�:a�:_��.��'ie'.^ �i �
�`�' FA,� '� 'i �- '.�15'�[ S � i3�'�S• f � t:7 ti ir yij t.il�'5���• ;�W�47.::H � T'- `�, �
"� � w i �"^ ':;; : . + 1 ,
� � ��' . j� .�,. �t �^?#.IrSh4 'r.�'d;SF'•V%�_Fti ! :P,�e°i t '� .� � ii
r
L� ;t S .� pZ¢:Y �"ZUi1�rt'. . ,` ,� :r .
' � +d�t�? j � �{'Y�. C:T" �"�!3..�..�'Y�f,�1�1['�6„S'.. ���L: WS...� �•� �! '� .
: 1 4�• '� � �' , �
:'.!'' •. ; � 1... tj, • - � �+
�. .: . .;,.:.. {..w�.:i : �: �y� .�t'j!•,j ...._ _ 4�S �G��..1
�
. . . wi ;'�� , ..r.:. S��,t _ ._ '- ................... . �, - .. .
.... •. . � ` . .
, � � `�,{....b,�;.F�m a..mc..�ue�'..
. �q
��'}'� t.t,.-�� 'i�':}-fD(l.»_.�.��e.,,,: �} �7��$'�. .
�...�.5���'f i j i .,..:.....,:•`'•: i't '�^.� .�.,t,w'..�" 7 ;`" j:: :rL %.. �.... �.`.At:...����F[!'... . . . . ... ,.j'�� y�:i'^ MS
lY"i!
, ., . , _ ... � .
.
�� .. �.......i-. . �__,f ._.�_..._«....,.. .. . ...aE. . ........ .. . . . ':' . �.. ��
+�-:��-� . . .
..�
i �'}� i i-�'-�'a�� • i : � {^!r� t t,^
?_�.t..�w�i �-� i f� � C. F;.� •y 1.� `°� �� ..' r J .. . .
�S . F j` � i. �-�. � .i � ....Kt. ' � ... . .i„k /-fl�e .... .�+`. . ... .1�. b.,i.0:��`.,� , .
'� �...�..
n; � , : . i Y • '
' ...• :
, ''....f�.... ............. .-�� ....� �•
� i� . ....�, _. $ ,
� �ci -L::�;. 'i
�... �'� �
'�•' :u ! `i@�T Ef:t:7a
} �a � �
� ' i
'M1 ' . � �
� ' , ' � � � � �1&SIRa
.S : '; ,', . � . .f
x. . . �. . t�3 . ; �
i
i i :ji (�rM.q"���'(i r �!Y �.r�i.; 4:.}
. . �
j h-
�
� • �
• (
t �
��f� .�.. w_.___._._... .:._..::;a.�. .��.__.w,..�,..._,_............,.�....�.. .........,,.a.�,.W.w..�.,...,._..._.._._ _.M...._.�...�..._.__._._._.__._...
,f�f �. ,
j , ,
SuperAmerica Group, Inc.
� R E C�E I t�F� 1240 West 98th Street
—
�
�'"a"` MAR 2 7 '991 Bloomington, MN 55431
� SUPERAMERICA� (612) 887-6100
(612) 887-6158 FAX
March 28, 1991
City of Golden Valley
Planning and Development
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Va11ey, NQT 55427
Re: Golden Valley SuperAffierica Store #4389
Dear Sirse
Our present SuperAmerica store does not have gasoline
facilities. We are proposing adding a "one-sided" gas
island, which would result in installing two underground
storage tanks, two gas dispensers, a canopy, a new checkout
and some additional exterior lighting. There would be a
� loss of four parking stalls and an increase in green area.
We expect about a 40% increase in customer flow to
approximately 840 per day. The number of employees would
probably increase by two to a total of six. The overall
appearance of the proposed site plan would be similar to a
small scale SuperAmerica store using state-of-the-art
equipment. According to our store manager, many of our
customers and tenants in the strip mall have asked for gas
facilitiese We hope to provide these serviceso
Sincerely,
O
Michael O�Donnell
Regional Architect/Engineer
�
SUBSIDIARY OF ASHLAND OIL, INC.
�
5ixTer �meric� Crr��.�r, Inc.
rronert,y A�ress: ^5�?� Hi17.sboro rl
Golc3en V�tle,y, P�II� . S'���?�
We �vant �0 1et you know in writin;, th�t Fve wi.11_ do
�+n,ythinn we can to he.l� ,you in obtainin� :� conditional_
use nermit from the City Of Go1_den V�tl_e,y.
4Ye also ��rant you to knoc�� tha.t a.s this is a restruction
in use of the Pronerty, it witl be our intention to
modify the 1.ease if ,you decide to nroceed .
Arril 1, t991_ '
-� � ;
• �''' ��
�
Jean -?; Anthony Ouel1 ette
•
,
MEMORANDUM
�
DATE: April 15, 1991
T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission
FROM: Elizabeth Ao Knoblauch, City Planner
SUBJECT: UPDATE OF VALLEY SQUARE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Golden Valley HRA has determined that there is a need to proceed with the
upgrading of Winnetka Avenue in the Valley Square Redevelopment Area, even
though the former Ron Clark project for Area C will not take place and generate
tax increment to cover the costs. Don T�ylor, City Finance Director, has
reviewed the City's financing options and has concluded that the best option is
to pay for Winnetka Avenue by issuing bonds, which the HRA hopes to do in May.
The City's Bond Counsel has directed the City to update the Valley Square
Redevelopment Plan -- which will be used to support the case for a bond issue --
so that it reflects recent activity and current policies regarding the Redevel�
opment Areae The last plan revision was in 1982.
A draft update (attached) has been prepared by staff and approved by the HRA.
• While noticeably shorter than before, the revised plan contains a good deal of
information that was not included in earlier editions. The draft is organized
into three sections: 1) an overview, which identifies the area, presents the
justification for establishing a redevelopment district, and outlines goals and
objectives; 2) a closer look at redevelopment plan components, which focuses on
completed and planned activities within each subarea of Valley Square, including
a newly designated Winnetka Avenue Overlay Area; and 3) a finance plan, which
concentrates on financing needs for Winnetka Avenue and for land acquisition in
Area C. The draft also contains improved maps of area boundaries.
Overall goals and objectives of the plan have not been changed in content,
though there has been some reorganization of the statements. Redevelopment
plans within each subarea are consistent with the currently adopted plan, except
for a softening of the redevelopment concepts for Areas A-1 and C.
Action requested at this time is Planning Commission review and approval of the
revised plan. Because this is not a direct component of the City's Comprehen-
sive Plan, there will be no informal public hearing, but approval would still be
in the form of a motion by the Commission. The City Council is scheduled to
hold a public hearing on the revised plan on May 7, 1991.
EAK:mkd
Attachment: Draft Revision of the Valley Square Redevelopment Plan
•
! •
` DRAFT
Finance Control
VALLEY SQUARE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
ADOPTED JULY 10, 1978
REVISEO MAY 14, 1979
REVISED APRIL 6, 1982
• REVISED AUGUST 10, 1982
REVISED APRIL , 1991
•
f �
POLICY ON PLAN REVISION
•
This Redevelopment Plan will require many years to implement completely and will
have a major impact on the community during that period. In order to assure
that this plan remains consistent with changing community needs and objectives,
further review must be provided.
The Redevelopment Plan may be modified at any time before or after the lease or
sale of the project area or any parts contained therein, provided that modifica-
tion shall be accomplished in accordance with the requirements of applicable
1 aW e
•
•
•
PART I: OVERVIEW
Introduction
Located in West Central Golden Valley (Exhibit 1), the Valley Square area was
the site of some of the earliest business development in the City. A primary
impetus in the creation of the V alley Square Redevelopment Area and TIF District
was the desire to revitalize this aging business area, centering on Winnetka
Avenue north of highway 55. With the main City offices also located in the
area, the intent has been to establish a full-service, mixed-use district that
will provide a renewed sense of focus for a community divided by two school
districts, three major highways, three railroads, and three metropolitan
districts.
The Valley Square Commission was appointed in 1976, after a decade of periodic
studies and recommendations had failed to result in any significant upgrading of
the area. The Commission was charged with producing a coordinated study of land
use, traffic, and physical appearance issues within the Valley Square area,
including recommendations for improvements. A draft report was completed and
submitted to the City Council in J anuary of 1978. Following an approval process
that incorporated formal and informal reviews by local residents and business
owners, various local interest groups, the Planning Commission, the HRA, and the
• City Council , the Valley Square Redevelopment Plan was adopted in July of 1978e
It has been revised several times.
Redevelopment Area Boundaries
Historically, the limits of the Valley Square area tended to depend on who was
looking at it, and for what reason. With the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan
in 1978, an official Tax Increment District was created for financing purposes,
and was certified by the State Auditor' s Office. The boundaries of the Tax
Increment District then became the permanent boundaries of the Valley Square
Redevelopment Area (Exhibit 2). A set of subareas identifies locations within
the Redevelopment Area where specific projects are planned or have now been
completed. The various subareas will be discussed in Part II of this Plan.
Justification for Redevelopment Area
State law requires that certain findings be made regarding blight and
deteriorating conditions in areas to be certified as Tax Increment Districts.
The findings for Valley Square were established by resolution of the City
Council in 1978 (Resolution #96; July 17, 1978). Initially formulated during
the redevelopment planning process, the findings cover seven bases as follows:
le BLIGHTING CONDITIONS - the Valley Square area exhibits clear symptoms of
• blight in the form of
-2-
EXHIBIT 1 :
VALLEY SQUARE LOCATION MAP
e
, ,
, i. ',� :� — "- "% , .
` y_ � ��� j�� '° - /x•���.'� •. ,>,„m,
��.`. 1`} .: 'f:.;,�. ��, . i� „ ��� �. r�fj.,.
. I� �n;���� t�d+! ,�, .<
.'} .;� �� c,�.�Y w
W i'Y s�': 1� �i S•.' i
�.�w ' � `��.�'. . ,,. �.r..,W , 3k�'1^��t y�•. . r� ..�
:�: �
3 '/ �.� 'f '� '' •i� `n •'a' ' � %'�'�.i��� � a
� ���
/� •' :.�� �:i,`,•�� %°.?�,
i ��� �' .
��,�:w`L� .� 1/ d �ik.�+�`ai `,',�� _ �� �� ��-- �I
��� ,�.;, , ;r :����,�;;� � ..
.:5+; �� � ;� ��ty� i ;� 'i����__ ,•
' � J
xn
� ,
• yg� � a ,iy� �dy�y ��'��'Y4t �� �+� '� � .`�: � • i �
� 7 �� . � ^�g O �'
-�- r.,.� f 4 __ , ��� I
e �zz*�a'�J •. �` ',.
-- --� � ` `{ � ' � \-
.� ' � � � �
i ��� ,� : .
ru� 1 �'�ppp�. �u \ ,,3N3��j ` , I �o�`�' � `\
�_i_ � •4L L' � � \ s !j� ` �� � — � � r I \�
c— �, `�' °�"■ �`�-�� ( �' � / � I
�::: � � i� " � �a?�.'".a �,;_ ;�r `'�- ,1�, I
( � �o..�__?�� n fr � Gor � J ,
' fl � •J% c `V' �' ���il �_.�' 0 � � �
_�1—�����,.`—_„_�= � ^"1�<- ,�..1 • - i
. � ��� C 1� �,� �� �
� � ��- -- � �
� � � L
r � � ;.s=i. .
�_� � � I—s+—f �r:.._
� � I � �
�i�I I� • —; �I a
I I�, I I�
�== 1
' ,�� ��
s • .` � �
i ' � '
�'t � _ � � . � _
� �. ii �° �
�n
� � :• � ti.,,�� , %�...,�
s- ,o'; :� -1 ;: ; � � �., �J� �' ' � i.
�� � � '� � � ��� a � �I
,
� � r�i'�iy
�F /'�"� ,� i 9� � �� I ��' �L '�•��� i
�� S Iti� I �� :
� ;
��''° � -`� � �, I� � � � � C� �; �
!�# �_�
� � - L �r t� I ��' �
_ �,.�.
�.'''° �� _ L �^'—It_� � .�,i t ....x;��,,�( - � - ( t
�� N � — 1,`4�`,�j�'�g'L�'.L � r
,■� � � :. ,'c�,�; �R�.' _
�I�l, W a � " +'��� aiR��•�`• • � '.
L( 2 :,f,`, ' a3'h '\;�l�ti:f:; .�:3" .�
� - • £ . •i u i• �.:
= J � .:.).•ii l��L•.'t'.Y�'.;�:�t�,.�°�[,•�:��in a
'� ��..o�.. . �,:�;�'+' S .•:vl.�:.:ai:r
'+L��w°h'+a .��:3��yA„D, .
� � �yV i:}�� .q�:r �9 t�� �
�- �� , � . � I
,
�
� 4 ��
S � I 8
i
. r _ $ � ,� a
. ��� -�r _ � �` #
9l�1 � �, -
'�r nr,nr l •
�3—
�. EXHIBIT 2: _ ��
UALLEY SQUARE AND ACTIVITY AREAS � ` �' -1•13 �' �O�
Cn �.
'�
,J
e� Z .
�����s�r■��
�- . �
. �
��y i i
. �
n LL �, �
� � ���, -- -
� . �� � 'tST 300 �
I J 3 a ...4��-...�11�.• o
x • ,�• �' o
z , �� � -�
2�31W , � o
o , I -. �-� ♦ oc
a
� - Z L—, � _
� ..... :3nd..-�:d�1 y3 N Ni nn �
� r,_-� .� ,� ��� �
� - o
� � �
Q ( 0 / w r a°z
Z � R i-=- °°°z°z t,u
� �z °° F-�a�
�� N~3 Wm • W
OO 3 �-�
� � WWWJ �-QQ
=SF-J WJ3
� � F--F-Q O S OC I �
� t�4. F-W=1i O
F-OOJN � 1 3
� � W � � � � � N �04 OCF-Z
y � W O.av�7
1 0 3Z JC •�ZC=7J
� Q l_ � � ZQ2Qla] tn �t7
O � � � ..� .wnmy �_� ,e
' / /�y J O�Q WNNZN�.7 Q~Q�--•
�/ Gr- Q �WCW72CW,')O t3=7mC�
(7 ta.�Zl--Z �=�r
O Q Q O =1-�Q W
� � e �O�Z�4 WO�Z
I �� ������ �4 w 1--L Z W
l =.tuCO 00 • Q C y
r�� �i. �_,-�''°.-�►-Q- H x►-a
Z N~C" G.NC.N >-~Wa
O Or--�Q►-� W mZ3Z
►-+ WzZ=W=Z zOSQ
Q � O~,. F-W Z F-Z►�-� F-- �w C J
� ' A '"� =3�3F_ �SO�- �
� I � 00~�0�- y00ZW
l�1 f'`
� o �O W NZ •W w�... WZZW'
N /� � � OaMF=-C7 � �Wa��
\.d O �C F--�?LL.ZC�3 ZZC�7m�
� l.7 �F-�000 OWa �-
� W O vf rr rr,Z ?C�F-J
+-� � �3t~7�V� W�SQ W
� W=W=W W O W t,)W]�
� �� O N I--�In F-N Z Z Z
OOC � Z �O W W p
� U �ZOt�O= O�Om��aC
oN nd Noos a�dn3�no�
� � Q ,
� • .+� °4� 1 �
A. undeveloped or underdeveloped parcels that fail to contribute to
the local tax base to their full potential ;
B. obsolete, unattractive, and/or worn out structures, site lay- �
outs, and amenities;
C. unnecessary clutter such as above-ground utilities, a profusion
of signs, poorly screened outdoor service or delivery areas, and
poorly maintained or nonexistent green areas;
D. a multitude of vehicular and pedestrian circulation hazards; and
E. an adverse image in the eyes of local residents, the business
community, and realtors.
2. NEED FOR IMMEDIATE INTERVENTION - without prompt action as recommended by
the Redevelopment Plan, the area may deteriorate beyond any hope of
saving.
3. NEED FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION - the area has already deteriorated
beyond the point where the private sector can be relied upon to turn it
around without government assistance.
4e SUPPORT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT EFFORTS - the Redevelopment Plan is
designed to foster optimum conditions for private participation in the
redevelopment effort.
5. ADEQUACY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN - the Redevelopment Plan adequately •
defines development goals and standards for the area, and provides suf-
ficient guidance as to appropriate land uses.
6. AVAILABILITY OF RELOCATION OPTIONS - the City has reviewed available
resources and guarantees to follow all applicable federal or state guide-
lines and requirements regarding the relocation of displaced residents and
businesses.
7. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - the goals, objectives, and general
intent of the Redevelopment Plan are in conformance with the City's
currently adopted Comprehensive Plan.
These findings show that the Valley Square area is in need of a government-
assisted redevelopment program, and that the City of Golden Valley has laid the
groundwork to properly direct such a program.
Redevelopment Goals and Objectives
To direct the course of redevelopment in the Valley Square area, the City has
established a set of broad, philosophical goals for the area as a whole, and
three sets of more narrowly focused goals and objectives relating to certain
development aspects of the area.
.
-5-
OVERALL GOALS
� 1. Stimulate and coordinate an aggressive revitalization effort that no
si'ngle business, developer, or governmental agency has the capacity to
undertake.
2. Establish a unified commercial and civic center that is a distinctive
source of identity for Golden Valley.
3. Strengthen and increase the tax base of the area.
4. Reverse deteriorating conditions by providing opportunities for private
investment and reinvestment.
5. Provide for the orderly physical and economic growth of the area through
controlled development and redevelopment.
6. Work toward a 1 and use pattern within the project area which results in
more functional and complementary relationships.
INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
1. Maximize trade area accessibility and circulation safety by creating a
more organized traffic pattern.
A. Identify, and augment as necessary, an arterial and collector
• street system serving the area.
B. Identify and correct traffic safety hazards.
C. Provide for safe and convenient pedestrian movement.
2. Upgrade the appearance and amenity-level of public rights-of-way.
A. Provide pedestrian-oriented benches, litter containers, attrac�
tive lighting, and plantings.
B. Relocate utilities through underground constructione
LAND USE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
1. Create an atmosphere conducive to increased levels of economic activityo
A. Replace old deteriorating structures with new development, or
rehabilitate structurally sound buildings.
B. Remove and relocate conflicting or non-complementary uses.
C. Encourage participation by owners and tenants in private renova-
tion of existing commercial buildings.
� -6-
2. Promote redevelopment that is diversified, but coordinated.
A. Increase the amount of office space. �
Be Provide the commercial core with support from high density
housing.
C. Encourage new development to be organized in a planned environ-
ment.
SOCIAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
1. Create a community focus and sense of area identity.
Am Improve the physical appearance of the government center and its
environs.
B. Improve the physical appearance of the commercial coree
2. Minimize potential hardships in the acquisition and relocation of
conflicting or non-complementary uses.
3. Achieve a balance in the variety of commercial businesses and services to
satisfy the needs of the neighboring residents and larger market area.
Specific action plan components, whether already completed or still in the plan-
ning stages, will be discussed in part II of this Plan.
PART II: REDEVELOPMENT PLAN COMPONENTS S
Initially, the Valley Square Redevelopment Plan was organized into phases of
development that bore a general relation to geographic location within the
Valley Square area, but were not specifically location-based. Over time, it has
been discovered that redevelopment activities are easier to stage and to track
based on geographic subareas within the overall district. Therefore, this revi-
sion of the plan, which summarizes activities completed to-date as well as
outlining future redevelopment components, will deal with development staging
within each subarea identified back in Part I of the plan (Exhibit 2, page 4).
At this time, the most critical element of the plan is considered to be the
Winnetka Avenue Improvement Project, and the coordination of Area C redevelop-
ment with that project. Previously, Area C redevelopment was expected to pre-
cede and act as a trigger for the street improvements. However, a reanalysis of
the situation, including such elements as the local and regional redevelopment
climate, traffic congestion occurring in the area, and the financial prospects
for the City and the County, has caused the City to reorder its priorities. In
the following pages, the "Winnetka Avenue Overlay Area" has its own summary of
activities, and cross-references are made within the summaries for other areas
as appropriate.
Area "A"
Location: Bounded on the north and west by curve of Bassett Creek; on the south �
by Highway 55; on the east by Wisconsin Avenue -- Overall size - 17 acres
-7�
1978 Characteristics: Large portion of area occupied by Reiss Greenhouse, a
commercial grower; also included two single-family homes occupied by Reiss
family; no other uses.
� Plan Characteristics: Improved traffic circulation; high density residential
development along creek, large office site fronting on Highway 55.
Redevelopment Activities Completed to-Date:
° Acquisition and clearance of all property in area .
° Extension of Wisconsin Avenue northward to intersect lOth Avenue
° Opening of Wisconsin Avenue access onto Highway 55
° Realignment of Golden Valley Road from location adjacent to highway to a
more northerly, curving route across area, subdividing the site in to two
parcels identified as "A-1" and "A-2"
° Construction of 3-story, 122 unit apartment complex, mostly market rate
but including low-income set-aside, on A-2 site adjacent to Bassett Creek
° Bassett Creek walking path
Current Action Plan Components:
° Preparation for and attraction of large-scale development, preferably
office, to the A-1 site
� Area "B'"
Location: North of Highway 55, extending up to Bassett Creek; West of Winnetka
Avenue, extending to Wisconsin Avenue -- Overall size - 29 acres
1978 Characteristics: Mid-size commercial strip center with three outlying
buildings along Highway 55; two small-size commercial strip centers along
Winnetka Avenue; a super-market and miscellaneous other small commercial
operations; two single-family homes along Creek.
Plan Characteristics: Improved traffic circulation; generally mixed uses with
emphasis on commercial ; no residential uses.
Redevelopment Activities Completed to-Date:
° Acquisition and removal of one of the two houses
° Acquisition and removal of Hennepin Co-op building (business relocated
within Valley Square, on Lewis Road) for street realignment purposes
° Vacation of Vermont Avenue adjacent to street realignment
° Realignment of Golden Valley Road to a more northerly location, beginning
just west of supermarket and continuing through Area A
� ° Former Golden Valley Road alignment west of the Vermont Street alignment
closed to thru traffic but retained for local access and to protect
underlying utilities
_g_
Current Action Plan Components: "
° Commercial redevelopment of sites cleared for Winnetka Avenue improvement
{see Winnetka Avenue Overlay Area)
° Acquisition and removal of remaining single family residence �
° Sassett Creek amenities
Area "C"
Location: North of Highway 55, extending up to Golden Valley Road, East of
Winnetka Avenue, extending to Rhode Island Avenue -- Overall size - 11
acres.
1978 Characteristics: Mid-size commercial strip center along Highway 55,
D ahlberg, Inc. (hearing aid manuf acturer), small office building, and
miscellaneous small commercial operations located behind strip center to
the north; two single-family residences along Rhode Island; triangle of
vacant publicly owned land between Golden V alley Road and Country Club
Drive.
Plan Characteristics: Improved traffic circulation; unified mixed-use develop-
ment over entire site; high-density residential component desirable but
not mandatory.
Redevelopment Activities Completed to-Date:
° Both Residences acquired and removed
° Gas station at Winnetka and Golden V alley Road acquired and leased out .
pending future removal
° Small office building acquired and temporarily being used by the Golden
Valley Public Safety Department Drug Force Task pending completion of
improvements to the Public Safety Building, located in the Government
Center Block
° Dahlberg, Inc. acquired (business relocated to North Wirth Redevelopment
District)
° All other miscellaneous small properties acquired, with leases to be con-
tinued pending future removal
Current Action Plan Components:
° Acquisition of commercial strip center (Krelitz property); HRA plans to
acquire property in 1991 even without a development agreement
° Coordination of redevelopment site with Winnetka Avenue improvement (see
Winnetka Avenue Overlay Area)
° Vacation of Country Club Drive to improve configuration of redevelopment
site (underground utilities must be preserved)
° Establishment of large-scale, mixed use development to fill area �
° Widening of Rhode Island Avenue at approach to Highway 55
_g_
� Area "D"
�
Location: West half of block bounded by Highway 55, Rhode Island Avenue,
Country Club Drive, Glenwood Avenue, and Kelly Drive -- Overall size -
� 7 acres.
1978 Characteristics: Trevilla Nursing Home, largest land use; gas station at
Rhode Island and Highway 55 with adjacent wet area to east; five single
family residences along Rhode Island.
Plan Characteristics: Area to be shared by Trevilla Nursing Home and mid-size
office development.
Redevelopment Activities Completed to-Date:
° Acquisition and removal of all five residences
° Acquisition and removal of gas station
° Drainage improved
° Construction of 81,000 sq.ft. Valley Square Corporate Center
Current Action Plan Components:
° None; public sector redevelopment activity in Area D is considered
substantially complete
• Area "E"
Location: North of Golden Valley Road, between Winnetka and Rhode Island
Avenues; also known as the Government Center Block -- Overall size -
16 acres
1978 Characteristics: Golden Valley City offices on most of block; public
library and post office along Winnetka; McDonald's and another small
commercial building also along �Jinnetka; original block was wider, with
rova of single family residences along Rhode Island, but street relocation
marks current boundary with all residences counted in Area F (see).
Plan Characteristics: City offices in a campus setting; Library and McDonald's
to be only other uses.
Redevelopment Activities Completed to-Date:
° Construction of new street segment along northern boundary, connecting
Rhode Island to Winnetka
° Acquisition and removal of small commercial building
° Reconfiguration and redevelopment of McDonald's operation
° Reconfiguration of City parking areas and access, and partial landscaping
• of campus area
-10-
Current Action Plan Components: '
° Completion of landscaping, including a walkway between City offices and
library
° Redevelopment of post office site after taking for Winnetka Avenue o
improvement (see Winnetka Avenue Overlay Area); relocation of post office
within Valley Square preferred but not mandatory
Area "F"
Location: North of Country Club Drive, between Pennsylvania and Winnetka
Avenues -- Overall size - 17 acres.
1978 Characteristics: Calvary Lutheran Church; 19 single-family residences
along both sides of former Rhode Island Avenue alignment; small office
building south of Golden Valley Road at Pennyslvania.
Plan Characteristics: Calvary Lutheran Church, including associated outo
buildings, and high density residential north of Golden Valley Road; mixed
office uses south of Golden Valley Road.
Redevelopment Activities Completed to-Date:
° Acquisition and removal of all residences along old Rhode Island
° Construction of realigned Rhode Island Avenue
° Construction of high-rise senior housing complex including 80 subsidized
rental units and 120 market-rate co-op units �
° Construction of small , multi-tenant office building adjacent to existing
office building
Current Action Plan Components:
° None; public sector redevelopment activity in Area F is considered sub-
stantially complete
Winnetka Avenue Overlay Area
Location: Winnetka Avenue right-of-way and abutting properties on east and
west, extending from just north of Orkla Drive on the North to Harold
Avenue on the South (Exhibit 3).
Note. In order to provide the full improvements as necessary within the
Vajley Square Area, this overlay area must extend slightly beyond the
Valley Square boundaries on its north and south ends.
1978 Characteristics: Lack of capacity at peak periods, inadequate channelizam
tion, proliferation of driveways, and high accident rate.
Plan Characteristics: Added lanes for improved channelization, reduction and
coordination of driveways, center mediane .
-11�
EXHIBIT 3:
• � WIP�NETKA AVENUE OVERLAY AREA �
\o
��
<
DRj�f
C � .
� NW ..
Rq j�Roqo � v
�
W
�
Z
W
�
' a
. a
Y
• �
W
Z
Z
►-r
3
�ii
� .
i
HIGHWA Y 5S '
. � �
�
�
� �
�
N '
� .
�
�
� �
� HAROLD AVEIVUE
�],'Z e e ,
Redevelopment Activities Completed to-Date: °
° Redevelopment activities in Area E (Government Center Block) have reduced
the number of driveways accessing onto Winnetka Avenue, have created
better spacing between remaining driveways, and have reserved necessary �
right-of-way expansion area across all but the post office property
° Two of the affected properties in Area C have been purchased and are being
leased out to businesses that will vacate as the actual construction
period approaches
Current Action Plan Components:
° Acquisition of additional right-of-way across 12 residential and 5 busim
ness properties
° Acquisition and potential removal of 2 residential and 7 business proper-
ties that may no longer remain viable due to road widening needs (in some
instances, simple right-of-way acquisition may still be possible)
PART III: FINANCE PLAN
The objective of the Finance Plan for the V alley Square Redevelopment Area and
Tax Increment District is to indicate the ability of the City to finance public
redevelopment activities as described in Part II of this report. Since the
inception of the Valley Square Redevelopment Plan in 1978, much has been done
and the City is well on its way to completing its planned activities before the
tax increment finance funding source ends in 2001. •
The public improvements that have already been completed in V alley Square,
including the rerouting of Golden Valley Road, Rhode Island Avenue, Wisconsin
Avenue, and the clearing and sale of land in Areas A, D and E for private devel-
opment, have all been financed by previous bond issues now being paid back by
tax increment financing (Exhibit 4); projections clearly indicate that the
City can continue to meet its obligation on these bond payments.
Projects Remaining to be Financed
There are two planned activities for which City must sell bonds before the Tax
Increment Finance District ends in 2001. These two activities are key to the
original intent of the Valley Square Redevelopment Plan. Since these two prom
jects are costly, the only way they can be financed is through the issuance of
bonds. Unless these bonds are issued within the next two years, the projects
may become financially infeasible. The projects are:
A. U radin of Winnetka Avenue from Harold Avenue on the south to Orkla
venue on t e nort - T e upgrading of Winnet a venue Co. Rd. 5
has been a ey e ement of the Valley Square Redevelopment Plan since
1978. The road now has four narrow lanes without turn lanes. Inter-
section improvements are needed at both Golden Valley Road and lOth
Avenue. In addition, the road carries over 20,000 vehicles per day.
This section of Winnetka Avenue has a very high accident rate in com�
parison to other Hennepin County Roads. �
-13-
o �n �n o
to �n �n �o
. � w � a' :
N t0 „
N Lfl �
O O l0 i� 1� t0 O
N N N M M N 1
•--� � v �
� 64 b9
H
G1
• o o t� �C'f O O O O v
I� O� O O t0 O
I M O Op �p O O � O
N�--I
N O
M N O O Ln O OJ
�N � �, M 1� O O lD 1� N N
v � ef N N � O 7
� � ..M.. v •--� r-1 /+f L N
!R �A 7 r
G.
'O
� 0 O � O O O O L O
� o � O O O M O ++�
01� O
^ w w w w w
N L
Q1 O O
e�-i t�0 O tt� ^ t[I � 01
� � O v GO v M M d' 3 9y
N � �
� 64 64 L 3
O i�
H-
�n o '°
�r o
� � o � rn o o rn o v�i o
�
rn a"`o o° `.-.° �rn °v ° °o n � o v
'~ 'a' '"'d N 00 t� M et 00 O Ol
N ... .... � o o v
m" � .-� o 0
.s�r o �
�n n.
0 0 �n o 0 0 �n o �.c
O O M t0 O O � O ��
� eh O
.$
01 CO O I� M O O I� t.[9 .
01 ra O N OD � M � N CI 0J
~ � w
N v .-. v N E C
� W .� � �O
64 C C
O O ��
O O O O O O O O .0 GJ
eF O O� �--� O O tt O Of C
'.T'
� � o °o "'' a o o ao �n s ro
OO .--o N 00 00 � t0 lD Rt t0
�1-� (V � .i v w -p
•r � fR .�-1 C N
,Q 64 �O.�
• 'r � �-. � .-. �
s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �v
X � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c
w i ch � � o 0 o v o �o �o
rn o 0
o v� o ui o o ui ��.+
� �,�, � O ct N .� l0 O f� � C
v 00 v N r-� 00 CD 01 N
,...� cV H E
<,q � � r . .
b4 .�i N �O L L
rsr � n �o ro
a a n
N o 0 0 0 0 0 �3 a�+u
0 0
z � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o �o
� N 0 N l27 O O lCl O �'O � �
►� N
F- 01 tD O 00 N O � O Ln • d S4
� °� ° ° a+ v N o a O c 3 0 �,a
W .--I O w v OD v M �' In O�11'1 �O r0
7
O N N v �--� t0 +�d �O r r--
d �' rq .� ro ia io
� O N}�i C.1 V
� i-..-. .-. .-. i-. � r y��e-
V O o o O O o o O O O O C) C7 3 O OOi O^1 O
� 0o O O O O O O O O O O L N O \\O
� � � O O O O O O M u'7 N O II.'II O+��--��-e O
'C X N U\\
�--� 01 � O O M 00 tn � O� th O O t0 � � � 0 N N N O
C e-� � � M �.�.� N ..~.. � � O � +a t0 O O C C O
N tp O O� �' O O
z � N � w
W
.--� h- U 4- a fR a Of CfbR
.� d D 46i +� d
W f6 e0 T�r- OJ 1--a N¢�� V!
� � +� U+� +� C�.G f..)n- G) C C��-
U
Z L C�� � O C� N I-+�01 7 Q+�+� 7
~ d a4 C^ U CCO • � p1 M 1A N VI
x +1 G 1�1 Y l0 • �O •r+i N r1 1/1 E�1�l Yf
O 7 7•'-
� cl d � aUi o m e 3asO° a�i 3as ro aio �,�e"_ L o 0
� ��- � 'O m �� 1 O 1 � I O M d U O 01'O 4- �
} w-O t0 01 C f/f VI C
1 ti.. rf L C) t 1/1 C N� N d Vl t0 \ L >�--1 O N'O'O O
� c ""' * io a � c. a � -e � � v c� -o c� r- ao a� e c.c
d a� c� c c c .-. � c ai o 0
++}+ �+ •� +� �+ o a o+.� o rn o+� ,-e ¢ a��as�,-v- a�m m�
S N +� C�r t0 L �--� C �O C 00 Q_' CC �/I C O� 1A 1-� f+I Vl � O U O
� � � � � �"�a d N d W W b \ L �M+�N O O I�
L a CY� CY� +�++ +�v+� O. +�.� N O t fH U� � L CO 00 Gl
d d C� a4�� N N d fO C C C C G C N �--i w U �O CC N O.C1 01 N
!- U U L �O 0.--1 � Of.i Rt�� d N Gl+� G! O^� OJ+�1 U L d� +- e-1 ra�.-
w c c c�Q c� rr.c� c++ E E�E c� E.cc� E c� c +� v � �o++a.+ ui v vr
J �-+ i0 C�.-. Ol Yl i6�r-e-r OJ C N Gl D�4 N N Gl t/1�� N Ol r0 Rf
Q X I r0 "�S1n Q YI 1-1�! 0�Q E Gl L L� L'.7 L L'�'7 N �'O Cl C1'C O O O'C
d' t0 L C.Y d' C E C.1 fJ O� C) O U N 8s U O rtf Of � N OJ�'r'f OJ.G OJ
� � 00 � E'C S t � Ol O C= L y •• C C • C L C+�O C L CC C N Vl�F O�a
Z � 0 C (.1 a.0 L G) N > GJ ►-�r-i L[')►+C r-�•� •r-�a +a 'O�- OJ L �O N tCf O R7
1- � � oL a-��nEO > o u ... ao .c v c � ro �aErnao� E
p i rt3 �LL. +� 7 O !��.1 O L • X X X Ol X G1 X d UI C Cl L M- G/C7 ln�
• U OJ L+� L� �h-i�1 O.L� G > �O Id VI f0 � ,O L M11 7 �tl R1 E U G i� 01 Y U � w�
J t0 E L F-1--'O F- C F Y+� C C� �V C7 C d O 01 Yl X.�t0 t/l
O � d-1 GJ U N 1 Q �r C GJ 1 r-i N C OJ VI OJ 41 L nw Q C(n W W fAlR W
C7 V R W" � 4" C� 3 4- N O I� O.--� >�--i 4-W N > � +� U
H Gl � tn v--� N�.-i ; GJ O Yi� N 00 00 OD O�4 O� O v O�e O/ � C
LL i-� C O C C eD O L C C C�1 +� O�01 01 01 61 .1-1 O �--a �..-. r..e
O U �-�1 R3 L t0 7�G]G ttl 7•�- � .�.y .y ..a �-a U •• �--i N !'7'�7 tl'f t0 1�CO
Gl N •• tA L O.. •• L.LL L LL N Gl Gl tA rr 4f
� � ,O =W F N� � Q � � � �I v�s vvvvvv
�y jp � O C pl +�
L O N O
C> > O. d J d 00 �[ Z
-14-
The City and County plan is to upgrade Winnetka Avenue in 1992. The '
upgrading will include wider lanes, turn lanes, a center median,
sidewalks, streetscape features and new traffic signals and intersection
improvements at Golden Valley Road and lOth Avenue. The upgraded road
will reduce accidents, carry the traffic more smoothly, and generally t
enhance the area.
Recommended Financin - The upgrading of Winnetka Avenue is a joint
project wit Hennepin County. Since it is a County road, the County is
the lead agency. Both the County and City Capital Improvement Plans
call for its upgrading in 1992. In order to fund the project, the County
has asked for significant City participation including 50J of the con-
struction costs and 100% of the right-of-way acquisition needed to widen
L-he roadw ay. The City plans to fund its share by the issuance in 1991 of
$4,000,000 of tax exempt, general obligation tax increment bonds. These
funds will be used to acquire the necessary right-of-way during late 1991
and early 1992. In 1992, the City anticipates the need to issue another°
$2,000,000 in tax exempt, general obligation tax increment bonds to pay
for the City's share of the construction. Both bond issues would run
until the year 2001 when the Tax Increment Financing District expires.
B. Area C Land Ac gu�isition - As described in P art II, the City plans to rede�
ve op t e entire�rea C block. The City has yet to negotiate a private
development agreement for its redevelopment. However, it is anticipated
that a developer will soon come forward.
The City, through the HRA, plans to complete the acquisition of all par-
cels in Area C. Currently, the HRA owns five parcels on the block. The
Valley Plaza Shopping Center and adjacent property owned by Phillip �
Krelitz are the only parcels left in the area for which the HRA has not
negotiated a purchase agreemente
The HRA is going ahead with the acquisitions in Area C without a developer
in order to better influence and control the development of this Area,
which is the key development area in the Valley Square Redevelopment Plan
due to i ts prime 1 ocati on at the NE corner of Wi nnetka and TH 55. Si nce
the V alley Square Tax Increment Fund has the funding available, the City
believes it is in its best interest to go ahead with the acquisition of
al l parcel s i n Area C before the abi 1 i ty to fi nance the project ends i n
2001.
Recommended Financing
The City has programmed the financing of the acquisition of the remaining
parcels in Area C partly through available excess increment in the Valley
Square Ta�c Increment Fund. The acquisitions of the M&I building at
$230,000 and the Down in the Valley building at $185,000 in the
Spring of 1991 were financed in this manner.
The acquisition, including relocation and demolition, of the Valley Plaza
Shopping Center is estimated to cost $4,500,000 for budgetary purposes.
Fifty percent (50%) or $2,250,000 is to be paid from available excess
increment in the Valley Square Ta�c Increment Fund and the remaining 50� by
the issuance of a short term, (two-year), $2,250,000 general obligation
tax increment bond issue. This issue will be a tax exempt issue. �
-15-
' Financial Projections
The financial projections for the Valley Square Tax Increment Fund are shown on
Exhibit 4, including the funding of the two proposed projects described above.
� The projections indicate that the City is able to finance these new and past
obligations.
The projections shown are conservative in several ways. First, they do not
include as revenue any interest earnings. Second, the interest rate used for
future bond issues is higher than the City will probably pay due to the City's
Aa-1 bond rating and market conditions. Third, the City has not indicated any
proceeds from the sale of land that the HRA owns or will own in Area A-1, B or
C. Fourth, the City has not indicated any tax increment proceeds from the
future development that is sure to take place in these areas.
The future projects outlined in this plan, upgrading of Winnetka Avenue and Area
C Land Acquisition, are essentially the last major projects that will be needed
in the Valley Square Redevelopment Area in order to provide for all of the
future redevelopment anticipated for this area.
•
�
-16-
�. a
• M E M 0 R A N D U P�
,
DATE: April 18, 1991
T0: Chair McAleese and Planning Commission
FROM: Mary Dold, Planning Secretary
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF ATTENDANCE
Attached please find a report of Planning Commission
attendance to monthly meetings (reviewing 1990 & 1991).
According to the By-Laws of the Planning Commission,.
under "Duties of the Chair", attendance shall be reviewed
every six months in February and August.
Due to the busy past two months in the Planning Depart-
ment and Commission agenda, review of the attendance was
del ayed.
• � If you have any questions, please feel free to call .
mkd
1
•
t
PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENCES
# of McCracken
�r Mtgs. Kapsner Leppik Lewis McAleese -Hunt Prazak Russell
1986 20 1 4 7 0 2 4 5
1987 19 5 2 7 1 2 2 6
�
1988 20 2 3 5 1 5 8 5
1989 18 1 2 4 0 3 3 5
1990 14 3 1 6 2 2 1 1
McCracken
# of Johnson Kapsner Lewis McAleese Hunt Prazak Russell
Mtgs.
1991 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 --
•
�
•