The URL can be used to link to this page

11-28-88 PC Agenda 1�. . . � . . � . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . � �. . . . . . . . . . � .. � .. � ♦ . . � � . . . . � � .. � �. . . � � .. � Golden ValTey Planning Commi'ssion Civic Center, 7800 Golden VaTley Road Monday, November 28, 1988 7:00 P.M. AGENDA I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 14, 1988 II . INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN APPLICANT:: Parker & Associates LOCATION: 1950 Douglas Drive REQUEST: Amendment of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map to Change the Land Use Designation from Medium Density Residential and Semi-Public to the Commercial Zoning District Designation � III . INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING APPLICANT: Parker & Associates LOCATION: 1950 Douglas Drive REQUEST: Rezoning from Single Family Residential and Institutional Zoning Districts to the Commercial Zoning District IV. INFORMAL PUBLIC MEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Parker & Associates LOCATION: 1950 Douglas Drive REQUEST: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Gasoline Dispensing in a Commercial Zoning District V. INfORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - I-394 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ORDINANCE VI . REPORT ON NOVEMBER 15, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MEETING � MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION ♦ � November 14, 1988 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair McAleese at 8: 18 P.M. Those present were Commissioners Kapsner, Leppik, Lewis, McAleese, and Russell . Commissioners McCracken-Hunt and Prazak were absent. Also present were Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development, Beth Knoblauch, City Planner, and Gloria Anderson, Planning Secretary. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 10, 1988 It was moved by Commissioner Leppik, seconded by Commissioner Kapsner, and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the October 10, 1988 Planning Commission meeting. II . INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLAN FOR PUD APPLICANT; Public Storage, Inc. LOCATION: 2300 Winnetka Avenue North REQUEST: Approval of the Preliminary Design Plan for a PUD to Allow Construction of Three Mini Storage Warehouses � With an Apartment and Manager's Office Rttached to One of the Structures Vice Chair McAleese introduced this agenda item and asked for a review of th� staff report. City Planner Beth Knoblauch provided a short review and suggested they hear from the proponent. Mr. Don Jenson, Development Coordinator for the project, and Dan Rooney, Real Estate Manager, were present to represent Public Storage, Inc. Mr. Jenson gave a detailed review of the project showing drawings, site plans, etc. He stated that they had a high quality type of storage business which included fencing for security, computerized gates, attractive landscaping and building finishes. Mr. Jenson noted tfiat the,y would allow no toxic materials or explosives to be stored in the complex. �f �ut�+mobiles, such as classic cars, etc. , were stored there, they would have to be drair�ed af a�� gas and other liquids. Also that there were no electrical outlets provided that would allow people to come in and work on automobiles or other projects. It was also mentioned that this would be a low traffic business with approximately 40 trips per day and 5 to 10 trips during any peak hours. The hours of operation would be 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. and there would be a resident manager on the site. � ' Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 14, 1988 Page 2 . � Commissioner Leppik asked how hi h the securit fence would be what t e of 9 Y � Yp exterior lighting would be installed, and whether or not the buildings would be sprinklered. The proponents said the fence would be six feet in height and the iighting system would be directed downward so that people using the facility could see; it would not be directed off the site. They also stated that only the two-story building would be sprinklered in compliance with the building code, and it was not required in the other buildings. Commissioner Russe]1 asked if there were other mini-storage facilities in Golden Valley and also what type of signage would be used on the property. Proponents stated there would be a 4'x 8' illuminated monument type sign in front of the building on Winnetka Avenue and lighted identifying signs on each side of the the building at the corner of Winnetka and 23rd Avenues. Mr. Rooney indicated they were not aware of any mini-storage facilities in Golden Valley at the present time. Commissioner Lewis asked what type of landscaping there would be. Mr. Jenson said there is an existing row of large trees a7ong the north side of the property that would remain in place and that other landscaping on the property would be attractive and meet the City' s landscaping standards. Vice Chair McAleese had concerns as to whether the lighting would be turned off at 9:00 p.m. when the business closes or left on longer. The proponent stated that some of the lighting would be turned off but some would have to remain on � for security purposes. Vice Chair McAleese opened the Informal Public Hearing for public input. Mr. Marko Mrkonick, 2320 Valders, stated he was speaking for himself and three of his neighbors and that they were a] ] opposed to the mini-storage facility. He noted that although he appreciated the work the proponent had put into the proposal he had concerns regarding environment and the fact that Winnetka was already a busy street. He had fears that the people using the facility would misuse the park area adjacent to the property. Mr. Leland Frankman, 7831 - 23rd Avenue North, does not want a mini-storage facility in a residential district nor anywhere in Golden Valley. He felt that it draws a transient group of people and that people using the storage would misuse the adjacent park area. The Informal Public Hearing was closed. Vice Chair McAleese asked staff if there was a need for an EIS and/or an EAW and whether there would be any drainage problems connected with the proposals. Director Grimes stated it did not meet any of the thresholds for requiring an EIS or EAW and assured Commissioners that the City Engineer indicated that the drainage could be handled with existing facilities. � • Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 14, 1988 Page 3 � Vice Chair McAleese asked the proponents what the market is for this type of facility and how it would benefit Golden Valley. He also asked what type of history their other facilities had regarding police being called to the property. Mr. Rooney stated that generally a business of this type would attract residen- tial users from a two-mile area and commercial users from a larger area. Mr. Jenson stated they have had very few cases of police having to be called to a facility for security reasons. Vice Chair McAleese also asked what efforts had been made to sell the property for business and professional offices which is the present zoning of the property. The proponents stated it had been for sale a number of years and that other proposals had beer� made but dropped. There are some soil conditions on the property that make building on the site more costly tfian normal . It was moved by Commissioner Leppik and seconded by Commissioner McAleese to recommend City Council denial of the request for approval of the Preliminary Design Plan for the Planned United Development proposed by Public Storage, Inc. at 2300 Winnetka Avenue North. The motion was opened to discussion. Commissioner Leppik questioned the need for a mini-storage facility in a resi- dential area. She commended the proponents for their first class proposal but stated that the property has residential areas on two sides and was such a large � block building that it was not an appropriate use for the site but may be the most optimal . Commissioner Kapsner stated he agreed that this was not the perfect use but there may not be a "more perfect" use. Hennepin County will not allow access to the property from Winnetka Avenue so the traffic will have to use 23rd Avenue. Commissioner Kapsner feels this proposal would create a lot less traffic and would be a quieter use than an office development. Commissioner Russell indicated she agreed with Commissioner Kapsner that there would be less traffic and the visual impact would be lower and more conservative than an office development. Commissioner Lewis stated she was leaning taward approval of this facility and she felt it would be the best and highest use for this site. Commissioner McAleese said this may be the best use but that there were still too many items for the project that were negotiable and that he was concerned with the signage on the building if it were lighted. Director Grimes suggested that the Planning Commission could table their decision until more information was available. The motion to recommend City Council denial of the proposed PUD failed on a vote of2to3. � ' Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 14, 1988 Page 4 � It was moved by Commissioner Ka sner seconded b Commissioner Lewis to recom- P � Y mend City Council approval of the request for approval of the Preliminary Design Plan for Public Storage, Inc. , 2300 Winnetka Avenue North. Commissioner Leppik offered suggestions for several conditions of approval if the Commission decided to recommend approval of the PUD. They are as follows: 1. Suggested all electrical sign lighting be turned off at 9:00 p.m. and that there be no ligtated signs on the buildings themselves. 2. That evergreens be added to the south side of the property so that the building will be shielded throughout the year. Upon vote taken, the vote was 4 to 1 to recommend City Council approval of the Preliminary Design Plan for a PUD at 2300 Winnetka Avenue North requested by Public Storage, Inc, subject to the following conditions: 1. All electrical sign lighting be turned off at 9:00 p.m. and that there be no lighted signs on the buildings. 2. Evergreens be added to the landscaping on the south side of the property to shield the building throughout the year. III . I-394 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ORDINANCE � City Attorney Allen Barnard attended the meeting to discuss the I-394 Overlay Zoning District Ordinance. The Planning Commission was informed that this Ordinance wi11 be before the Planning Commission for an Informai Public Hearing on November 28, 1988. IV. REPORTS ON HRA, BZA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS Commissioners provided reports on the October 11 and November 9, 1988 HRA meetings, the October 11 and November 9, 1988 BZA meetings and the October 18 and November 1, 1988 City Council meetings. U. ATTENDANCE AT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS Planning Director Grimes said that he was concerned regarding attendance at Planning Commission meetings. (The October 24 meeting was cancelled due to a lack of a quorum. ) It was agreed that Mr. Grimes will write a memo concerning the need to inform Planning staff a week before the meetings regarding attendance. A policy regarding attendance wil] also be addressed in the memo. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 P. M. i . � November 23, 1988 T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development SUBJECT: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map Amendment, Amendment to the Zoning Map and Conditional Use Permit for Proposed Convenience Shopping Center at the Northeast Corner of Duluth and Douglas, P�rker & Associates, Applicant Parker & Associates have requested thre� planning actions in order to allow the constructior� of a 21,235 square foot ��er�ce shopping center at the North- east corner af Auautl� a�d Douglas. The 3.16 acre �ite is currently occupied by a church and three single family homes. The three planning actions are: 1. Amendment of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map from Semi-Public and Medium Density Housing to Commercial . 2. Amendment to the Zoning Map from Institutional (I-1) and Residential to Go�rrrrerci al . � 3. Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in order that gasoline may be dispensed at t�e proposed convenience store. (An additional CUP will have to be issued on this site if a day care center occupies the building as proposed in the site plan. Day care centers are allowed in the Commercial District only by CUP. At this time, there is not enough information about the proposed day care center in order to issue a CUP. ) (In addition, the site will have to be consolidated into one lot through the subdivision process. ) Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment Currently, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map indicates that the 3.16 acre site is designated for Semi-Public Facilities and Medium Density Housing. The property is currently occupied by two land uses. A church is }ocated at the south end of the site. The church occupies a 1.4 acre parcel (198'x304' ) . The remaining 1.8 acres is made up of three single family lots. The lots are each 66 feet wide and 360 to 400 feet deep. The Comprehensive Land Use P1an Map indicates that the land to the east along Brunswick remain single family. To the north along Douglas Drive the property is designated for multiple family for an additional 400 feet or so north of the proposed Commercial Zoning. � Golden Ualley Planning Commission November 23, 1988 � Page 2 � Over the years this site has been considered for reuse. The last proposal was for an expanded site at Duluth and Douglas that was about 7 acres in size and included frontage on Brunswick. This proposai was for the construction of 120 units of townhomes. This would have been an HRA subsidized development. In order to put housing on the site, a large subsidy using tax increment financing is necessary. The developer who was interested did a lot of work on the project but finally dropped the �ar��ect. One of the concerns was the high cost of the land. ��s sit� l�as be�n disc�s�ed as a site for multiple housing over the past ten years. However, no developer has b�en able to put a proposal together. The City has suggested this site for housing t� �he other developers but with no takers. The proposed commercial center would eliminate the corner for housing. However, the other land des�gnated for medium densit� housing north of the center could be considered at a future �ate. One of the concerns of the neighborhood has been the effect of any development on Brunswick Avenue. The last housing proposal received neighborhood opposition because it was felt traffic on Brunswick would increase. The proposed commer- cial center would not increase traffic on Brunswick. The estabiished land use pattern of single family homes on Brunswick would remain. It appears �hat the �c�se of this areafor multiple family dwellings is not � likely witt�out substantial assistance from the City. In addition, it would be necessary to assemble properties along Brunswick to create a large enough site for a multiple family site. The commercial center does not require a City subsidy and it does not require the elimination of single family homes on Brunswick and does not increase traffic on Brunswick as has been feared by the neighborhood. Because of the high traffic volumes at this intersection, this corner has been proposed for reuse. If the Planning Commission and City Council chooses not to actively market this area for medium density housing and subsidize its develop- ment, the small convenience center concept fits in with the area and fulfills a need for retail space in this area. At this time it would make more sense to look for places for multiple family housing on less valuable land that would require less or no City subsidy. Development of multiple family housing in this areais likely to raise neighborhood opposition due to the need to develop the property off Brunswick. I am recommending the change in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map to allow the rezoning of the property to Commercial . Rezoning of Property from Institutional and Residential to Commercial The property is currently zoned Institutional and Residential . The church is on a 1.4 acre site and the three single family homes are on three lots totalling about 1.8 acres. The zoning of the adjacent properties is as follows: north - Business and Professional Office and Residential ; east - Residential ; west - Industrial ; and south - Commercial and Business and Professional Offices. � Golden Valley Planning Commission . November 23, 1988 � Page 3 The site is located at the heavily travelled intersection of Duluth Street and Douglas Drive. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Duluth is 18,000 and on Douglas is 13,000. The proposed site plan includes the layout of the 21,000 square foot convenience center. The center is proposed to meet all setback requirements for a commer- cial structure. It is not anticipated that any variances will be requested from the BZA. There are several concerns that should be considered with this rezoning. First, is there adequate ingress and egress? The plan has been submitted to the County for their review of access points. City staff believes that the proposed site does a good job keeping the driveways to the center as far as possible from the intersection. The driveway on Douglas Drive would be moved to the north if the County believes additional distance is needed from the intersection. A small convenience center does not create a high volume of traffic due to its size and tenant mix. I do not anticipate that the convenience center would cause a traffic problem with the proposed layout. The proposed plan indicates that they will be providing a six foot fence or landscape screening along the east property line. This would have to be review- ed by the Building Board of Review. The developer said that this fencing and � screening could be done in combination with the neighbors to the east. I suggest that the six foot high fence along the east property line be established as a part of the CUP for the gas dispensing in order to screen the homes to the east from the cars going in and out of the convenience center. Along the north side the developer proposes landscaping rather than a fence. This appears acceptable because there is an office building to the north and there is no parking at the north end of the site. If the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map is changed to allow Commercial development in this area, the proposed convenience center appears to provide a good use for the area that would not have a significant impact on the residential area to the east and north. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Operation of Gas Pumps at Convenience Center The Zoning Code allows service stations or gas dispensing in the Commercial Zoning District only with a CUP. The proposed pumps are to be operated by the convenience store as is now typical . The proposal is to have ten pumps as shown on the plan. The location of the pump island on site plan would create a good traffic pattern. Cars entering or exiting the center and not getting gas would use the driveway south of the pumps. Therefore, access to the center from Duluth Street would not be hindered by cars filling their tanks. � Golden Valley Planning Commission November 23, T988 � � Page 4 The Planning Commission is asked to make findings and recommendations on ten factors. The factors and my comments are as follows: 1. Demonstrated need for the proposed use: The type �� c��venience store ��t �s pla��d �equires gas in order to operate at a reasonable profit. The ��spensin� of ga� at a convenience store also allows the customer a con��nience to combine a shopping trip for food and gas. There are t�a gas stat�ons across the street south of Duluth. These are typical service stations without convenience goods for sale. The applicant believes that there is a market for additional gas sales even with the two stations across the street. 2. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: If the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map is amended, the proposed gas pumps are consistent with a Commercial area. 3. Effect on property values in the area: With proper screening, the gas ��mps should not have a negative impact on property valu�s. � 4. Effect of �s� on anticipated traffic generation in the area: The gas pumps will not significantly increase traffic in the area. Trips to the convenience center will be ones that normally use the same route. 5. Effect of increase of population due to use: The prop�sed us� �ill not increase population in the area. 6. Increase in noise levels caused by use: There may be a slight increase due to cars starting and gas being delivered. 7. Any odors, dust, smoke, gas or vibration caused by use: There �� s��e odors caused by gas. However, there is a gas station across the str�et that has not caused odor problems. 8. Any increase in animal pests due to use: It is not anticipated that animal pests would increase due to the gas pumps. � Goiden Valley Pianning Commission November 23, 1988 . Page 5 � 9. Effect of the visual appearance of the use: With proper screening from the property to the east, the pumps should not have a significant negative visual impact. 10. Other effects caused by the use: I cannot see any other effects of the pumps other than those normally a part of a retail business. I recommend approval of the dispensing of gas at a convenience store. The gas pumps are now typical of such stores and provide the public with a convenient service. The following conditions should be attached to the approval : 1. The pumps shall be located as shown on the plan prepared for Parker & Associates by Tom Loucks & Associates, Inc. dated August 30, T988 and on file with the City of Golden Valley. 2. There shall be no more than ten (10) pumps. 3. A six foot high fence and landscaping shall be constructed along the east property line as shown on the plan referred to above. � 4. The pump plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Fire Marshal . 5. Failure to comply with one or more of the above conditions of approval shall be grounds for revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. Attachments: 1. Site Plan 2. Copy of Application for Rezoning 3. Zoning Map Showing Site Area 4. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 5. Fuli Size Site Plan (enclosed separately) � . . . u'�[J "' . . , � _ . � .. �y • :.�L' �0�1� .., (j ` . L / - � � ,. J •..: T 3e .. Q S ".�: J , : ••'i�' � H Et JJ�� rF�1.. (,16 '�I �• �C : ��:��) �(dx) N _, �T � ) � �� ' "r'iL% �"J_�J� ... ° �� G� � ,� � � , f1= ' t: •se u •:,!: . . ` � ,s' s,M � s J � 3i ` wt� ,; o . ce� �� -. NEST#F91lf- ��' � •,•s• ' � �J � �l " -�, y ' -MI'A/- ^ .� • _-� s�°1— 1 -——-- - 4, `SEC ►iID /��' ° �� f O � r � Vr r • �y.,I�• ' . � �^ �� H� hl�a j � ') �+1 ° °'• °- ' I�� • � � 7 J � � a ^ro� � �� + � �� ;�J� � ��/. � 9 �- _--�4 � /'rrc� 'r- /;�9) 'D,Z � ".3�. ` .-� - .��.e� �'. �J �s'�• ^� �' �sJ f — J_ ' '-F,,� �� 0��3qu�,s�. K' sG.��° �� •�° _ . ,, •t� .. ,��.�� CAURT': <�).c ��'�y � -� I rn� -3 : '�' ` , al: �° ,,:�.:�.{ d"'�.y � •• ` �►•., ...;� : :� � �� . ^�NN rr+ � w�r .. . . :' . � . � �` 3ri �� i (� . iM_ �j� — '`.'. ,.' � . i.'A', i J: a �f� . . � I �te� j• �sJ � •n ..;�,. � ` u (. • .1 �_ . .... �� r, . . � �.�1�� O � P � �ITE ��•�._ ... ,. , , a Z ,�; , :; ,�;, _ 1) � C s:�� _•�J '� W • ��2� � � r- �: i �j► Q ° ' � � • �� J� w �� i:f.:-r a�r•��t� ^ r J :�,.,;��, �� - ' - f G�`.. . e,� � ,. Fi. . `c,. ; , :s,± � �,. `�. �� I J �� i'• �..Y�ip' r�6U_ �'4i' `.�`��L�e . � , , . t:'l�oTw ►. -•-- -�-- � � . . , �aw�. .; . � �p;�• )�� SI�•�Cect 1 -flU��H� ee•3�e�n �: - ' t:.... � .:u�.- . t '�6,i' � � C��' :)l��.R� �'> � S, ' to� ./7._��S' JKL�.� ••} � .t h'��! . . . �('J' iR,-p � J+,. � �K �yr''�• ��• 1 l �, ' .•! � .e. ~ L[0 r ' ,� /H 'e: f� b', !�� rS�. � � S� _. '�"' ;I �� G I rR� 4��.�OF �'• ,;•,, �R�,,, .�l`�� I -:�=:, „ ;�� i _—I E--o� ' � �sa .� ' co��T e��.S �cK�;�'��'' ;Sr L. $• l� Y`al .. /—� � �j _ . . � ' ` I 1 1 �� L . �?'.,�� . .. � � � „�[ �Y� �, '.�� • +...� �� .. ' . �+ -4 .is� i:. n. �,�,' F _ ' � "�� : '� �C��Fl S T � � `�:'q'' ` ,,; �•_-. :,� �� '3 � _� =s� ; pp ,�•,,�� . Q . - . r.e. �N �s.7l� c � .:.) . �!-� t�rt'Sj'L ; —�-- �,�� _._ ,z �� R N WSCK y '��'�:,o. , , � _ �,�,� ,�. - OF (/ � � ,^ � . . . S4, .t� � �m � �3• T! � `�� 6�°-., � x �c<i! � V• � ry-•� � . '1 DULUTH. .;'� � N � �^ �=I •� 'O�`I��/ !�,lV��'(��yl '��S'�r Q�','yl Z�� . . �� . - � ,..�. �� ' (:� ', ' - = C �JR �,a.`a�..+ •� p '� �! ; \ < �q N ur �� ir!tt= ±n ��i- - N. !_ _ S� _ �. � :.� � rr _ '�.t l�'s (:�� . 0 2 ) � � .. /�i�jJ� �'fo �`(`,� r � �) r.n �• � �,�. ) .�). �� Y �'^ i. �� ^ � � � .,, � •Z �.� R� XSF�. � , _ �f� 3� � �- � �� R � � ry �� 4��t. ,� I,o ',',:�;� ` ."_I�-!;� 9 = �/F a. . � »WOLFBERRY .' ' .,,• � N ,r`• � .. ��qp • a r e»..,�s •.� u.. � ��' � � .�� i � "��+ - �' �� i�� ' �}� �:/�!. r w� . '. �E�4�O�'J � G,'`r /s'97,G�� Il� �(�►� � 1�,.,. •n�..:� �.r'�' t'�"�.. '�ti�. ��L�f W �. � , �. � ^ i�.��. ` e� �._ .t�h�!�4��. � �PS � �, � L o� f • �' i11e! '� S� �f��0 �GIIO�f � ' �� ( �l � /F! �',. "/R ' �1 �" T � � ��+ :i , . }_ „- • GR � VE. �+�= •t' �,,.o i� •�f � �' I'�� d �� .`��6' �-lr`2 � Ci) •�� nt 1t.,� 'N�.e� � ��0 7 l7. . �� . Nl.... fft �0�• yo J el � ��^. 5 `` , =pY,y �� i .i ��11 U �h 4�• . , . A� �I , ({) � J , t�I1�; ;�« ` �, , M ,�/ �`. AR Ll' GO D•N f,I^e' C � "8 � � l �_) .-. �� • �° '' ;•s • � : , . � •d^, _ r � �1� i 7 A t�e�r'� � q q If � � � •�i (�v (lO�. �,�.. Q�y ' �1 .. �}-` AD�D ,J'.�,. �4C ''� Z ' ., �1 ., , ,:- � �L Y80 T/LOT ; �� . N�, �. � i ff.' L \� V� ~ �1j � � � ��e '� N' . !'�J �� 3 , �J � l" ,K� � :� �c $r ��{.�=�(S�' / � • t �, • 'j�� ! � � �!!t Z �� v�p, ��t �'�' � ' �.��s ��• i�loS � �S) � k� �.� '�t ° °�t}� : M ��`� - . o,�.�r,�r� CROlX : s � �� _ 0 1N . �w . 33 .�.i � 4 �,� �: ^ /� ��'�s l Y[OitiM[� l�tE • :l1N1 ' � ' ' ' ' � . .}'w • I�J �N 7( ��: � � ' � 1 • ; tl� O : M) �t j� ..lL i` ZOl.�l� �� 1D!!!�� .A - .`.. �` _ ��• Z !•s.�7)�O,0!lr.� . � �p� �•� t' S�I�r 3 S 1 : �(y) °. �� _ �1'1� 1 • � �� ! v l �.. � �l� t I ):s�f� �,:l. ' (r) � l�zl �� sti� � �.� N. (�� : �,u ' ` .`•� � 'Ra" s°`'• '(=')B �=0 F � � �s°�, • j�y,� � W � ��t� +�t�/ �� x�1 � � ) � " ��o� .ir�� • � i��J �� zO �^" � Q 1�� _I'l j�i l?"!o;0 1t �1 1� zS''!L 7S i �� . �hA) V ��t�l' 2 � r ). � `(S�), (�� . I�- � . �At.�^l'� � _. __ -{ i:�� 4 u!i , u..,�'• . t,r f • �1 20 t} r I � �f? (�`�' � � � ; jj�1) � e�rl� N , (+;�� (� .�; �� `�y,,) ,e s{ ,�„ u ��f�o�Y1?pili�f�w� los�!!�!i'�!1 20 ' � Z � � N • � '` ��r!•., � �.� i,i, . y�.r:sc'- �') � y�� "7 �± �! 3� � st� ——— � �•�-� V � a a ` �P�e '+ /�� ' AUa �, �'�'� ' �'` ' �y b J dIV � 10 �, . , M �.. .. .• �o � �,� ,a - , s.�� , '�) `,� , '/� j �_ � 'f'�� (i�� o• S 's.�a (..r t : ��,1� '�'�' �9) • . � t 112�qf d! t �'IKI 1�N1 7.� r t ��y) , y lo �� !t� ��)' �1J �.��. — . � � � „ .•� �38��,�� r iS 16 � 17 I ��—1�-� � � . 2(�,+�Z, u , y' '' e) . -�' � z � i � _� .. � __e�.�7/` \ \_ .� � � �. �� ./ 5 f CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT w REZONING PETITION � GENERAL INFORMATION - READ CAREFULLY A11 requests for rezoning must follow established City procedure, which includes consider- ation by the Planning Commission and the City Council . The petition must be brought or mailed to the Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Va11ey, MN 55427 along with the supplementary information indicated below. All requests will be presented to the Pla�ning Cortanission unless directed otherwise by the petitioner. The Commission meets at 7:00 P.M. on the second and fourth Monday of each month (unless otherwise indicated) at the Civic Center,7800 Golden Valley Road. If the properly executed petition, with supplementary information, is received by the City Planning Director at least ten (10) working days prior to the Planning Commission meeting date, it will be submitted to the Commission for study and recommendation. The applicant must be available to meet with the Co�nission on short notice. If the petition, with necessary supplementary information, is received too late or is deemed by the Planner to be inadequate, the petition will not appear on the Commission Agenda. Should the appli- cant fail to appear before the Planning Commission, or subsequent Council meetings, action may be deferred. Regardless of Flanning Commission recommendations for approval or denial , the applicant and/or the Planning Commission may take the petition to the City Council for consideration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION � 1. Enclosed herewith is my check in the amount of $200.00, or $100.00 if in connection with Platting or three (3) single family lots or less, required for filing of the petition. I understand that NO portion of this amount will be refunded to me. 2. NAME OF APPLICANT Parker & Associates PHONE 829-5276 individual , corporation, etc. 3. ADDRESS OF APPLICANT 11200 West 78th St. , Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Church Site - 1950 Douglas Drive 4. STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY IN THIS PETITION Residential Sites - 2000 Douglas Drive 2010 Douglas Drive 2020 Douglas Drive 5. EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND INVOLVED IN THIS PETITION (Use extra sheet and attach to this petition. � See attached sheet. , 6. PRESENT ZONING CATE60RY OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY I-1 churches and schools; Residential PROPOSED ZONING CATEGORY OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY Commercial 7. DO YOU OWN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS PETITION (See Section 10) Yes x No $. PROPOSED USE OF THE PROPERTY, SHOULD IT BE REZONED (be spe�ifi�) The property will be � � converted from a church and 3 single family dwellings to 21,000 sq. ft. neighborhood service center. Anchor tenants include a convenience food store with gasoline dispen- sing and day care facility. Other anticipated uses include a beauty shop, barbershop, laundry, deli, card/gift shop and similar neighborhood convenience services. � Continued--See attached sheet. (SEE OTHER SIDE) ,� 8. CC�NTiNliE��. Existing zoning of adjacent p:operties include singie £aa;ily rESidential to the east, business and professional of£ices to the north, industrial to the west across Douglas Drive and commercial/business to the south across Duluth Street . The three residential sites that will be removed do not lenc? themselves to long term utilization for single family purposes because of traffic volumes on Douglas Drive and the direct interface with office use to the north and industrial use to the west . The non-tax producing church sit.e is similarly inundated by high traffic volumes on Duluth Street, and Do�i�las Drive and cc>mmercial/industrial developmec,t acro�s the street: which cannc�t be miti,ated . ThereFore, the significant F>lannin�3 iscue relative to these site� i� the questior3 of highest anca best use . ?t is CE�I talt'1 t��at a properly designed and managed 21 , OC'':� sq�.,are foo*._ neig}-,borhood service center i:= a reasonable transition betwe�n single family residents c>n E:unswic�. Avenue and heavily trave�e� arterials ( Douglas Drive anr_? Duluth Street ) arf�v adjacent commercial/industrial deveJo;-�- � ment . ThE� at.tachE�d site plan pro��o::�.s ta rrovide an E'. foot t�riva�y f�nct- ( if �esired by residents ) and vegetativE� scre�r��nc� �>atw�r�t=�r� the low profile neigh��orhoc�d servicF� cent.ei �r,,: ad;;acer,t single family residential propertie:a . In aodition , tht� t_•�ui] ding is orier�t.ed on the site so that rrta:ii activiti�.�. ir.terface wit.!� commerciai use to th�_� sout}, ar�d �nc3�Ctr.ial use t� the west . ^'r�,F�it c��r,e;atian i� negligibl� because such c�nte�rw• rt :y u�.on neighbc�rhood utilization and capture of existing traffic on Dulutf� Street and Douglas Drive. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Part of Lot 12, YARNALL'S GOLDEN VALLEY OUTLOTS, Hennepin County, consisting of Parcels 41 , 42, 45 and 46 . Tracts contain 3 . 16 acres, more or less . � 9. GENERAL AREA MAP: � Attach an accurate, dimensioned, general area map of the area to be rezoned showing � the location of the property in respect to existing streets, railroads, drainage ways, public utility easements, buildings and nearby properties which might be affected by the granting of this petition. Show names and mailing addresses of property owners within 500 feet of the perimeter of ':he proposed change. Show in a distinct manner, the location of the proposed buildings and all proposed streets, driveways, and railroad spurs which would be required. The scale of the general area map should be 1" = 200' or larger. Up to date half-sections of appraximately this scale are suitable for this purpose. 10. DETAILED PLOT PLAN: • Attach a detailed plot plan (15 copies) of the property, drawn to a scale of 1" = 50' or larger, showing boundary dimens�ans, �xact location and size of proposed structures, setbacks, parking areas, driveways, streets, railroad spurs, drainage ways, buffer zones and any other pertinent items. Indicate type or types of�exterior wall construc- tion on each building (i .e. , warehouse, office, showroom, etc. ). Show area of each building in square feet and the percentage of total land area covered by the buildings. 11. The undersigned below own the property which is to be rezoned and have been Tully appraised and acquainted with the uses to which the area to be rezoned may be put if the rezoning takes place: SIGl�ED ADDRESS PHONE /— G 7�5� 3/�� r � Gow� Va��-, Cr�.�G o� J JA ' �?�v�S�F S i3 �45 ��C��A:� S�3 -C�8?� p , -54/� �C n � a- 9�f s- �-�--�-� � � �o�o �.� •� �� -�-�-f- I Q o � 12. To the best of my knowledge, the statements contained in this petition are true and correct. gna ure o P titioner FOR CITY USE ONLY: The following information to be filled in by staff: Petition Received on Rlanning Corr�nission on �Council Action on y��'�'' � , �� . .. .. '.+. � "T' �.Y ,�, 1 �� .,�r.y,. J. T , ' ,.-.�. , ; , .. � i ♦r 1'•� �� 'f i . Z . , .Y. � •�� r,ywf i j r.� � � , s . . _� IV •�� ,r^".p'a++l�E►.4.{�� _ .w•7��. ..r+' O � r • ,� ` . . . O .• '•• , �• J •• � •• �� •� ,�,�,�•�• .' •►�•' �••• J �• � • •�. :�!T'� :ti.• 7-:�.. y�.� ::: • '�. ��:;:�: .�. I•�� 'i�� • . �. .I'�. 'A. •` � .�• �i±. ,..:. ,.,� --- :�� '1� ,�.:' ''y,_~�-n�,S%�- . ..^' ^. :. �•: �I�� '�.: �., -.,; ..••'" �. ; -'»- �,. `�' � �� •io � _,� :..,�;.:',.�^%�'�., _�� .'.,' . t'w '. . •. r �.• h^r� ;C „o ��'1 '� ` �^'1 , .ti�`• 1� 'r +'s, '� f �1(t ).� �.r� i � �.\ �/ �, � � �^ . y � � . W L � , w��w . :' ^ •r�� + , ..... �'�::4... �', •,', •�� , .. , .: ;,� .;•, •,. :r.: > ... ZC� ��hi' r �.J � ��..�/""�•'� �1 _��. �'•� -' 1w.t,. •• ,w •,r �,; .�,i,�.:'� !• .; --*�.•'" ] ' :•::•• .� .-��",�F�fG; �'" �: �i ; �^Ai.• ,./,� ',+��. ` /� 7FJ •Y y, r •; ^1• • . � � ,�A �.�r�� ! . .�•. '� �z k��e.��.i i�., '..:�� , � � .�,,. � • ,:,�� _ .: i-s �< �'i• .� ��1; .i '.:+. �.:� .,�� i �. �• � . i... e :� ��„�" •CL�M •}�• \ w `1 �_,; �,1\\. �• •� • "� ~'^'!� '•� ••� . - � �� 1 '� � '. •� 1 '� • •��• s�� •V `. '1•,, /�� ' ••'• •. •.. � M 'S . :••%::;•�' • S �1 . ci�_""�.s-,.�. •��•�� •� • •` nl � �••\,',','�•. � � . ••�.�"��i �"� •• � � ' ••�', ��•�� .. � • � • ••i7r i:'�ti•,�. ►' •.• \� I . , \I � O� :: �:•: �� ;=�'. � � �� s .v �� •��-• ," .��•,';��: � �• \ • �. r .• \ , 1 .��:., � •��• .�...�r• ► �. . �•• �r. �•� �'�!'� ♦ •��• •��.�� •.�• •�� ,1 � � 'i-�.±r• � � • • • �• `'' �� ; P.U.D. 1-B� :. ...,,,. ;. a' .�. �-,�' �-' • :��%''�� vc I {� „c .. ''+''�' ��: '' �' —: _ :r!-1..�� ; •,: -;', __— , - ":; . •;' .'��' �' �;; ,�.: t—==_ ,• ,�,.::'. .I . .�. %��;. t-= — '" � I,I . .� •;N• ' •' • �, ' �,►_—_. ''. • .'• '.�'' •,'� ~_..- � I�� • . .'. � '�'�' • .�• (� .�' •�• � ,� .��;.• '�__ '.'.'.'. ~ I� .. . ,•, • .• �.. ',• •� '. �'.':..`_ '':.-.T—• ;s' .. , r. ., 4 �.•.�� ,y� .. ...,..,i' •,•.•. = ..... I � . ;��.• :. . � �..��;: " :�.�.�•� .r+-��- .�'.. �+�►�,�+' I: . . .. ... ,�,: .�. .;' !'��;; �` :;•� �• .•.•.•:.•.�� f ':, .,'. ..:• 'I� . .;.�; • :� �....•• , .....:. . •• • � • � �.. ...... ..... � . .. . ",' .. I �, • � ;,....• . . .¢""��•..'.'.',' .. ..' .. . 'ti' '� O �:��• � ��• •• tr�Tyl. ••�.. �• � ' � ' • :��• :� � •�• O��• e J�•'•'•'•',• • W •. :�. ��`` •��• .�",••.�"�• •• •� ':� O\ '• •: v.—{••:• . N`�• •�:.....�-r�� • .�� • •. f�� ., 1��•,,.. h � ..•.I..._...•.•.� g; ..� ; ,.: : . •. . : .... .=• • . ;•• '�'� _I ..: •,:.�. � " •,•;� ;:•. � ;�:, ,� • : �.�. :..�; ,.`. .1, .�.,.'. < `�"��.} s«•w.+•. •' [ � ��:�'..' �2+-r. � .i`� 'z, •�•� �• •• `••� •* �• ,�'^: I ��: ,:�:"�• :�'. . 1.1. �',��„ •i' �1 ' '"F.�+'",� .:•. � �... ... I � .��• f ----'�• •�E , �' ,'.':�•.•.�•,.,•.��..�.-:' .�. i ..• •��•V�J`E•• � � •�� • i •�� •• M •�•••• ��• � > • • �t ��•a• O �• / •��•• .�rrr� r�� _ :.� ••�.��•�• u/� ,.:. .•.• .�. �• r:�.. •��•� •�• .\/ .r � . \' .•.••.�••.• . . � �� /4 �{•. �r � �.��. �t+. ':�r MESrER ��.�-. �'.�•, M � :!.c:�r'''' 'U'D �'i-y,i: I .�+1..��t .'' i` 1 (�( �:.r, � 1'� �C%��/,� .•.- - - '( \\\ $ $ 8 8 8 $ 8 3 $ $ °o ^ o o M - - S 8 8 °_ °0 8 S °0 8 � W � � i j � � i i i i , � � � i i i i i i i i i MAP 1 ' � � Z�w oo�c-- -�w�Tf�r^��--�rr ,�---- � .. ; oo:c- yr��, `. �.��'a��=�� . . . oac-� - `�., . � � oo.c-� ~�' ~4 . ooct- '� .� . ziro«i��o• oat_. � 8888888yQ�°8� 8 8 8 oo.a-� / ;i I i i i i � I i i t i I I I .o �-, , ' � . oM[-` / �r __—'_._'_r-.•e.�'°lu� -ooa. . al�� DOft- 1!� � . .�� .1�V'_ �'Ypl'�.±� _004� , �._ , '.. -�,r J� _ �.F, � -�a,. o p - � • �� 8 8 g o 8 i goa�- / I I ' � Ml� � � ��; �'�� -oo:r � ! x I. I . loo:•- _ `7�j, i ��_.� �I r� � ooc. . � . ox�- - aT- {I, 1 , �.� �- K��-�` . I �l �� -oo.. . . .oo��-. � �>� �., ' �� r-o� �+r _� -ooc. :oocr- � �� ` '��r ��_�� . � ��.. -w• � . t \ -s �m�.- - - � I � _ +� � !�-- •.� ..uaw -wu . . oo�r- - � � � �,V �l ' ,� I "°�� .� � �.� oon oe..- � �'`�j � ` t,� , I � s d,o� •f- � � _-oo.. J ( � �� i,-{- _aooc . e owr . � '�r � � �.� OOOF -ooi�. .a,�- " e =�`"'� f� � � � -oo�� f�«- � �:� � '( � ) -o� � � Q�„�._ � �I <�, � oo.�- .i(j{)� - _� t!� -°a° (!! •T; __�_ �+'� OV �M F . � � _�.� Q .�.,_, ::� — ,c.�.� � ` <.;^:: _o� : " , '� : = Q ,,,E_ i . . -�.� :� , - �- � , t;: ;'_oa� } . • � � ',� '' '�� `' r-�' � - �.- �. �,. � � oo�r- � i t_ C�'�`" :F ��-a+z. ' . . w�r s :•. '�. � -oa.� F � 0 � Opt�- _ . /� � . oor� /A . � � 00��- � _ {I� . . OOi�- � � -W9f � . � � 00��- /� i � I -OOa� _ . � . � yDl�- . I �-a'.��'r� . I -WR . i• . OME�.. � � � i -OOf9 � :..v. OYtf- //� � ��.�� I -(vil� � � � '. �T �� r�:� ' �`'I��= d -ou„ � �1 �' --oou /II.• ji � �. � . r � • ,� s —oo:. �� = t -� oo+.- � � 'f- � � ,y� � .r -oou ttl = a . �.- •- �. `3 �J _�., � ! Fi o�ow- �� i -ooc, . # I`'' �'�°� ` �`�"1 � �� —�.. � '` � `'� ' � , �. , J —�., �;,, � �� .._ . ��. ,�� .::::: 1 ,� ,j _�.� :i� y� �.� z °°"- ��lf� �;�� —J —«,., �y o �_ -- ��Q;'; —�,,. . . � Z � fi .°°N � �. � �� .t. i/�f �✓ -w.. � � W � �n- .a ��,V� , . r. � -uoc. .00b- � -mr� o �- r �»- 1 j Y � �� a �a' .� _ � � -W�Y �� . . . . . , �,- •; -OOI• f ' -WY� «�- _�. � a �- _�o. �.- j -o�,. �»- . -�<. _ ' „ �,.- ; _w,. � c°`a- _ �a` � �i;�.. -uo.. �- '�:r' , - -f�.-. -ooc. �—�'rwr7=�ri�n�Ai��i�"v��sns' —'.a Y�—�a - —7 _- [ _.}�-- � I 1 I. I I I I I i i I i � i i I ! I I I I �I I� I ` i i i I 1 I I i�l I I I = � $ � l8 � 1 � 8 ! ! l � f8 � sass � l � � 8 i88��$g��aa .. MiM1UL /O . �11� p. COMPF�EHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN PUBLIC 8 8EMf-PUBLIC F�ESIDENTIAL � : MUNICIPAL - VARKS, NATURAL AREAS O SINGLE FIWILY (LOW DENSITV) � S EN i-PUBL I C FAC I U T 1 E S �'��.�''��'.'��'.�'�.�'.'��'��'�.�'�'��'�'�.�'� ME D 1 UM DE N 5 I TY � SCNOOlS, MICHMAY DEPT. � HIGH DENSITY � 1Q0 iT (APPROXJ GREENBELT N. OF INDUSTFt1AL � lAUREL, E. OF PENNSYLVANIA b M. � �NDUSTRIAL, TERMINAL OF TURNERS CROSSROAD MAREHOUSE ANO RADIO � NATURAL AREAS � LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMMEFiC1AL BLSINESS AND � PROFESSIONAL OFFICES � l—3