The URL can be used to link to this page

07-27-87 PC Agenda - � p Golde� Valley Planning C�:�,�;o�ission � Civic C�nter, 7800 Golden Val��v Ko�,� July 27, 1987 7:00 P.M. . ; A � ENDA I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 13, 1987 II. INFORMAL PUBLI� HEARING - PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLAN FOR AMENDMEN7 TO PU[1 #2'� APPL��ANT: Gonyea Company LOCAr"'{��: 1100 through 1200 Boone Avenue North REQUE��; Approval of the Preliminary Design Plan for Amendment to r PUD #24, Midtown III. REPORT ON HRA, BZA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS a ; � IV. REVIEW OF LAND USES FOR EXPANSION OF NORTH WIRTH REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT V. YEAR 2010 PLANNING PROGRAM VI. d'ULI��;H/D��:'�,L�S��1�� E :�TUaY , . _ �� . Br�ng copy p►9��r:d�;�°��r di siri buted) ` VII. REFi�RTS ON 198i �1Pd1 C(1hlFE�EN�;E � � � � � �O �� MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION July 13, 1987 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the City Council Chambers of the Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chairman Prazak called the meeting to order at 7:07 P.M. Those present were Commissioners Kapsner, Lewis, McAleese, McCracken-Hunt and Prazak. Commissioner Russell was not present at the beginning of the meeting. Also present were Alda Wilkinson, City Planner, and Gloria Anderson, Secretary. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1987 It was moved by Commissioner McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Commissioner McAleese and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the June 22, 1987 meeting. II. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: John S. Kozlak and William P. Kozlak LOCATION: 604 Lilac Drive North � REQUEST: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of Valley Village Jax Addition to Adjust the Property Line Shared With Valley Village Apartments Chairman Prazak introduced this agenda item and asked for a review of the staff report. City Planner Alda Wilkinson stated that this request for an adjustment to the property line between Jax Cafe and Valley Village Apartments was in accordance with a court settlement of a property line dispute. Commissioners had several questions regarding the setbacks and staff indicated that the adjustments to the property line did not affect the nonconforming setbacks of the two properties. Ms. Betsy Baker, attorney for the proponents, was present to further clarify their request. Chairman Prazak opened the informal public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one, the informal public hearing was closed. Commissioner Russell arrived at the meeting. It was moved by Commissioner McCracken-Hunt, seconded by Commissioner McAleese and carried unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the Preliminary Plat of Va11ey Village Jax Addition. � R Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission • � July 13, 1987 Page 2 III. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT - APPLICANT: Stanley Kugler LOCATION: 4240 and 4270 Glenwood Avenue REQUEST: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of Gruskin Gardens Second Addition Which Adjusts the Lot Lines of Residences at 4240 and 4270 Glenwood Avenue and the Vacant Lot Located Between the Two Houses Chairman Prazak introduced this agenda item, and City Planner Alda Wilkinson ' reviewed the staff report and stated that staff recommended approval of this request. , Proponent requested that, until the new ]ot was sold, he be allowed to maintain the present driveway along proposed Lots 2 and 3 because of the expense involved in constructing a new driveway and in order to preserve the trees. When the lots are sold he would either construct a new driveway on Lot 1 or obtain an easement over Lot 3 for his present driveway. Commissioners had concerns over location of the access drive to the existing � Kugler house on an easement over the proposed vacant single family residential lot. Staff stated the opinion that reconstruction of the drive on the same lot as the house is not necessary at this time provided space is reserved for the possibility of relocation in the future. The modified lot for the Kugler residence retains street frontage adequate for relocation of the drive entirely on the Kugler lot. Therefore, staff recommended allowing the proponent the option of either relocating the drive or seeking a shared drive arrangement with the buyer of the vacant lot. There were also concerns over the water and sanitary sewer lines and easements through Lots 2 and 3. Staff agreed that the utility easements appear to restrict the type and size of house that could be built on the new proposed Lot 3. Ms. Lisa Kugler, daughter of the proponent, was present to answer questions. She indicated that the sanitary sewer line could be rerouted toward Leber Lane in the future if an easement could be obtained to the north. The Planning Commission concluded that the easements are a private matter between property owners. Chairman Prazak opened the informal public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one, the informal public hearing was closed. It was moved by Commissioner Kapsner, seconded by Commissioner Lewis and carried unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the Preliminary Plat of Gruskin Gardens Second Addition subject to the following conditions: � Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission ' � July 13, 1987 Page 3 1. Reconstruction of the access drive for the residence at 4240 � Glenwood Avenue entirely on proposed Lot 1 and removal of the - - drive from proposed Lot 3, or documentation prior to Final Plat approval of an easement by separate instrument across Lot 3 for the access drive to the residence at 4240 Glenwood Avenue. 2. Documentation prior to Final Plat approval of easements by separate instrument for water and sanitary sewer connections to the residence on proposed Lot 1 over proposed Lots 2 and 3. 3. Provision of standard drainage and utility easements ten feet in width along street right-of-way lines and six feet in width along all other property lines. IV. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING , Commissioner Kapsner stated that he did not attend the City Council meeting of July 7, 1987 as there were no Planning Commission items on the Agenda. Mayor Anderson and Council Member Thompson "joined the meeting. � V. RESPONSE TO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLANNING LETTER Chairman Prazak called on Commissioner McAleese, who suggested Planning Commission discussion of the Metropolitan Council invitation for input into their regional planning program. Commissioner McAleese noted that many of the regional planning issues identified by Metropolitan Council are the same as community issues raised at the City of Golden Ualley Centennial Town meeting and items listed in the Planning Commission Year 2010 Planning Program. Commissioner McAleese suggested that a response to Metropolitan Council to inf�rm them of local interest in these same issues may be appropriate unless a City response has already been made. Mayor Anderson informed the Planning Commission that the City Council provided comment on the Metropolitan Council list of regional planning issues and met with Metropolitan Council Representative Dottie Rietow to discuss City comment on regional planning issues. The Planning Commission concluded that further response is not necessary at this time and expressed interest in receiving any future communications on the Metropolitan planning program. VI. VISIT OF CITY COUNCIL LIAISON COMMITTEE TO PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Anderson and Council Member Thompson explained that they were visiting the Planning Commission for the purpose of providing liaison between the two bodies. Discussion topics included the Planning Commission Comprehensive Planning and Year 2010 Planning Programs, procedure for Planning Commission input into Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) planning and project approval processes, potential upcoming referrals to the Planning Commission, � and scheduling of another town meeting. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission ' � July 13, 1987 Page 4 VII. YEAR 2010 PLANNING PROGRAM The P1'anning Commission decided to address the first two items on the Year 2010 priority planning item list at the next Planning Commission meeting. Staff will prepare worksheets to assist Planning Commissioners in preparing for the work session. ' VIII. RECEIPT OF DULUTH/DOUGLAS LAND USE REPORT Planning Commissioners received the staff land use study on the Duluth/Douglas site and decided to discuss the study at the next Planning Commission meeting after allowing additional time for review. XI. REPORTS ON 1987 NEW YORK APA CONFERENCE Commissioner McAleese provided Planning Commissioners with a report on his participation in the 1987 American Planning Association (APA) Conference in New York. Commissioner McAleese stated that recent Supreme Court decisions have affected information which he received at the APA Conference concerning legal issues and that he will prepare a memorandum for the Planning Commission on these issues. Reports from Commissioner Lewis and City Planner Wilkinson were • deferred until the next meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 P.M. � * July 22, 1987 T0: ' Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Alda Wilkinson, City Planner SUBJECT: Informal Public Hearing - Amendment to PUD #24, Midtown Mr. Dennis Gonyea, Gonyea Company, proposes an amendment to PUD #24, Midtown, an unfinished residential PUD, in order to proceed with completion of the project. The original PUD, approved in June 1980, proposed construction of ten residential units arranged in five duplexes on a parcel 2.37 acres in area. The site location is southeast of the intersection of Boone Avenue North and Plymouth Avenue with unit addresses ranging from 1100 through 1200 Boone Avenue North. The developer, Zappa Development Company, constructed the first duplex, 1100-1110 Boone Avenue North, in 1980 and installed the private access drive and utility lines for the remainder of the PUD at that time. Zappa Development Company has not proceeded further with completion of the PUD, and the remaining portion of the PUD has been available on the market. Attached is a narrative submitted with the amendment application from Dennis Gonyea explaining the program proposed for completion of the project. Dennis � Gonyea requests the option of marketing the four remaining duplex building sites to individual builders. As explained in the narrative, Gonyea has been actively involved in marketing the remaining PUD and has been unsuccessful in finding a builder to undertake construction of the entire project. At the same time, there have been inquiries from builders interested in developing the remaining duplex sites individually. The proposed amendment establishes an enlarged maximum building footprint for each duplex. The new building footprint necessitates minor adjustment of lot lines leading to rep]atting of the property. As noted in the narrative, Dennis Gonyea has secured an option on the property and commits to undertaking the soils correction necessary to prepare each building pad for construction. The amended PUD retains basic elements of the originally approved PUD, which proposed zero lot line division of each duplex for separate ownership of individ- ual units and lots. A low area on the northeast portion of the property is reserved as common open space, and the PUD calls for joint ownership and mainten- ance of the private access drive and common off-street parking areas. The primary changes from the original PUD are enlargement of the building footprint to accommodate upgraded units and provision for flexibility in building plans for each individual dup]ex. Planning staff favors provision for flexibility in future building plans, thus allowing for marketing of individual duplex sites to separate owners. Preliminary building plans and building elevations specifying exterior materials are required as part of the PUD General Plan of Development. However, staff sees no problem � with writing flexibility into the PUD Permit. The maximum building footprint established by the proposed PUD Preliminary Design Plan establishes minimum setbacks. The proponent reports that all interested builders have expressed the desire to build larger units than approved in the original PUD. Therefore, the Golden Valley Planning Commission Page 2 • � July 22, 1987 proponent feels that specification of a minimum building size is not necessary and that specification of the largest possible maximum building pad improves marketability. Staff agrees with the proponent that upgrading the size of units is in the best interest of both the project and the City, both in terms of accomplishing completion of the project and in terms of obtaining more desirable units. Variation in building design may be viewed as an advantage rather than a disadvantage. The homeowner association documents provide for design approval by PUD owners, and Dennis Gonyea will be a major owner until such time as units are completed and sold. Design control exercised by the PUD owners, combined with City Building Code requirements, assures acceptable structures. At the same time, the option .of finding one developer to build the entire remainder of the project remains. The enlarged building footprint proposed by Dennis Gonyea approximates that of a previously proposed amendment to PUD #24, Midtown, which received Preliminary Design Plan approval July 17, 1984. The amendment proposed in 1984 was submitted by Gary Properties, Inc. , and proposed completion of the original PUD using new � building plans for enlarged duplex units. The proponent did not pursue the amendment through General Plan of Development approval to finalization. Lot line adjustments currently proposed by Dennis Gonyea are exactly those previously proposed by Gary Properties in 1984 and granted Preliminary Design Plan approval . Copies of the originally approved PUD and of the 1984 amendment granted Preliminary Design Plan approval are attached for comparison. � Variances from Zoning Ordinance requirements of the Two-Family (R-2) Residential Zoning District, which are incorporated into the proposed PUD amendment an may be approved as part of the PUD approval process, include variances of minimum lot size, lot width, and side yard setback requirements. Minimum lot area required by the R-2 Zoning District for a duplex lot is 12,500 square feet, and minimum lot width at the building setback line is 100 feet. Only the most southerly duplex site, consisting of combined lots 7 and 8, meets the minimum size require- ment. The two end sites, consisting of combined Lots 1 and 2 and combined Lots 7 and 8, meet the width requirement, but the tow interior duplex sites do not meet the 100-foot combined width requirement. All variances of lot size and width in the 1984 proposal and in the curr�nt proposal are similar to those for the originally approved PUD. The only new variance requested in both the 1984 and currently proposed amendments is the reduction to five-foot side yard setbacks resu]ting from the larger building footprints. The reduced side yard was approved at the Preliminary Design Plan stage in 1984. At that time, both the Planning Commission and City Council concurred with the staff conclusion that the variances are warranted in view of the constraints imposed by working within an already approved PUD design and in view of the benefit to be derived by upgrading the size of the units. In order to place the four enlarged duplexes on the building sites, the 1984 and current amendment proposals set the second duplex unit, located on Lots 3 and 4, further back from the private drive than the first duplex unit, located on Lots 1 and 2. The possibility of adjusting units either to the north or to the south in � order to maintain an even setback was thoroughly explored by staff and the Planning Commission in 1984. Due to existing placement of utility lines and the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 22, 1987 ' � Page 3 necessity of maintaining drainage area on Lot 8 at the south end, it is not possible to move the development to the south. It was concluded previously that maintenance of the required 35 foot setback from Boone and Plymouth Avenues on the no�th is more important than maintaining uniform setback from the private access drive. It was also suggested that lack of uniformity in setback has less impact on the curved drive in this PUD than it would have on a straight residential street. Planning staff still feels that the proposed arrangement for accommodating the enlarged units offer the best design solution. The proponent of the amendment, Dennis Gonyea, is developer of the adjacent single family residential area to the east of PUD #24, Midtown. Mr. Gonyea's purpose in proposing to purchase and complete the PUD is to eliminate a detraction adjacent to his development and to replace it with an asset to his development. Therefore, the proponent and the City share similar objectives in wishing to complete the PUD with as attractive units as possible. Based on determination that the proposed PUD amendment would facilitate completion of a problem unfinished residential PUD and would result in upgrading of the buildings over those in the originally approved PUD, staff suggests that the Plannin,g Commission recommend City Council approval of the Preliminary Design Plan submitted by Dennis Gonyea for amendment of PUD #24, Midtown, subject to the following conditions: 1. The owner of the existing unit located at 1100 Boone Avenue North within the � PUD shall participate in the application. 2. Landscape materials shall meet minimum size requirements specified in the City of Golden Valley Landscape Standards. 3. Separate water and sanitary sewer service connections shall be provided to each unit. 4. Building plans shall provide for separation walls in accordance with City Building Department standards. Attachments: 1. Site Location Map 2. Narrative Accompanying Application 3. PUD Preliminary Design Plan Application 4. Existing PUD P]an 5. Previously Submitted PUD Amendment Proposal 6. Amended PUD Preliminary Design Plan (Full sized plan sheet enclosed separately) 7. Landscape Plan (Large plan sheet enclosed separately) � - � 20 ... _.r.. . r, . •_}_ :i-- i�., •'!i 1 i %"j '.• : ..r i_.::. _i�.. � � . � 1�� i �•..L._1 Aescrip�ion vacafin� . .... Z�j 6?. � ., � S�rCC!r10f G/C2-�see �; _ -- Bk;uM�sc.,.�� `�•°�', �qo�.26 M _ . :0 � ... ' ... � _.. . �` ��..• Y_- L.1� -------- , t74.99 ��0.01; iTfof " 8f,s9 1 ioo.tr o�Ge:oi: o/3t.99 q •p e : ' ZSZ.O�g� ♦ 1>� `�tal 6q.99 h q� �o�o oq� °o 'P°�••,� � o , a� -�� e0sb � 0 5 ' o�' 14 r 13 ao ory � . s . ►��' a ;\l �' � 4 � • � g �^''��'� �•,L,�b�E .' �•��+� ♦ 2 3 O eo. .�"'+ a• r. Q' tia• „ • �• a �, �� • � '►m � �b�•��p ,��-� �, .I G 2 �. A �w ma IS e 12 Nm�� N 2 � - . � a � `799 ,�� 6N� � /l�.99 ON i2f.a � '� •�10 Ilf.B'l � f.16 �� w: Q � �•O�i v U ..� ^m' ' �. 7o h I i 'V: '�"^.� +� �a m �� °�' 0 3 � �� b � s � G � DEN � � � �. `- `��ss� � �zs •- � e o �2 V�L E Y � , v v a� ,s� : Z��:2,�, 3 � .r � :. � . a w. � ~ � 09 a-' 60' ° 1 /293 9�.� b '� q `w N � Q o `r 4 �� ,,.� .1k .n \�' �0 29/ 9�.��i.4� �Z� 11 Q'►• �N �7 o n �;0 ofB6 '..Y i.'� //9 i2 1� . //7.0t N . /1/ ?B 2 .-'' � N r e ,.` ♦ R:�2 ' 947/ �S.fn;7� 5p •ie �� : o fO+`� .P �� ° , (98/D� _ � N��. C/�� T� a �1° , e �:�S ti ,,� a�� o , : - o � m t ,� /PB2 �� 'a � � ' ti o 5 � Q� 1e J` � / �v `� `R's i ' c,rr � .� e � v. 9 - p �y �i�LLEY � 4 �5!l.�?e p'�,4�j4.77 gp 7e.90:�+1'� �� ;� �� + 29 �� j �soL E �: 30 �� 5�: �6 n �e° � �A� �28� �9 � ' ��r ` ' � 'k�� I.� ��E ATES '2 nd ` 21 N� 20 v 19 ti� r.cs � � ` : ` e �' 6 �� .. /I�3B / 80 � � , _ l73.46 ��a SO /l9 p `�i eS� � 7 �_' ; : ^ i _ ui�g�. . .��P«P ..s,. �c u. �6�J- 35/46 � .�,t - ; i -a, 100. 'n°e- � .._..�,.�r:.--�.��4�•'iPy4 � ;3 159.4 0 � 4 l00.4 lao.4 a'd ; , � o� IS r.) _) I 18 . , ��.3(j � � � � - 6 °=� =� 4 .�I 3 ,n� Z o li a�eR S 512) ^ o � � I I " I _ � N � � u+ 158.8 �•� loo.o � � loo.o � te2.6 �4'� � 1 � M Q ^ N � Y�4C. �1i81.1J _ `° 158.8 � .o �'� 322.6 �7 ,,; o �� i� s ° T -°j �1 � I • � __ £ost 350 � � �o•o _J � � � /85 l65 � �------ o I� ( � �. : o � .� � � v°. 2 °v • o o�,. � a= ° � Q ;Vm � �M 8 ��.,> I N 1 4 ` 65 t i i 1T 1.47 � � � � zp 3 0 � I • • � � B360 830C ` � � '`'� 519.4 , s Bg'° ,65 , 681•4 , , _� .� ,s�T _ei^��2a°w , : .st _ �n th _ - ,� �,�.-•. �- o ea�� Q' ` '" . 66'S.3� 591• • : DOG.N0.3769972 °��' 8�59-B30/ ,, (1ao5) � � N R{ � O `t' 3 � � 1� � N N � � � �., �a � � • � G OLDEN s VALLEY z M � �o 0.16••: ,.East 245.25 - �� a' ieb.L9 .. 2�2.4� - 33 '� v 9 z5 :o: NQ. . ��NTY - 01TC... �----- •. 1�. � ' E•i9'i4'20" h � tq�•6 R,,a�.�� N .. �.�zB.s� 35 ° � I o "�+ wA-.:o � _.;��..••;�.. HW r�t,ts}Do ie �o m � ��; `� ` /.... ,e. (No�E'�D' ��a�+No � Z � o ��- .W`.01 d•,tch �'s�O. � . � • ~° � \��qy��o c • '� .30 "' 6.38 2►i.s6 r 516.0 - -- - -._. ` 1 _ n�r_ � GONYEA COMPANY FIFTY GROVELAND TERRACE• MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403•TELEPHONE (612) 377-019t � MIDTOWN - PUD #24 PROPOSED AMENDh1ENT TO PUD ADDITIONAL CONiMENTS The Gonyea Company has been agressively marketing Lots 1 through �, Block 1, Midtown for more than five years .on behalf of the owners. � In that time there have been two atter�pts by contingent Buyers to amend the existing PUD on subject. In each case the attempts were abandoned prior to gaining final approval from the City of Golden Valley. In addition, there have been numerous inquiries of City Staff by prospective ourchasers. None of the attempts to date have succeeded. Over time the site has been used as a dumping ground for a variety of soil types, tree trimmings and grass clippings. 14s a result the site took on a • very cluttered appearance from the dumping and subsequent growth of volunteer trees, brush and weeds. The marketing efforts historically have concentrated on sale of all lots to one Buyer. That aoproach has been mandated by the building elevation requirement. That is, that a specific style building be built on all lots. The proposed amendments to the PUD in the past dealt with changing the building elevation covered by the existing PUD. Since those efforts failed, and the site was becoming less attractive daily, a new approach was needed. The new approach dictated t4vo basic steps for a prosnective Buyer: 1. Clean up the site 2. Seek an amendment to the PUD that included approval of a building footprint only, not a specific building elevation. The petitioner has optioned the property. The property has been cleaned up substantially and even now has significantly greater appeal . � . �,.�., ��.�.�...«�.�a��.�.� �nOONK�VMi � The next task is to ain a roval of the amendment to the PUD. The 9 PP building pad size of 50' x 72' wi7i accomodate a wide design range of duplexes. Thus individual Buyers will be able to design an attractive 'duplex for each of the four (4) building pads. The control of the design is already in place as the By-Laws of Midtown Homeowners Association, Article IX, Section 2, C requires appointment of an Architectual Control Committee. Thus individual Buyers will now be able to design a duplex with a footprint up to the �0' x 72' size pad as petitioned for with control on design by the now contingent Buyer of the entire site to insure a quality development for all lot Buyers as well as the City of Golden Valley. The petitioner will , following approval of the proposed amendments, cause the necessary soil correction to allow for construction of a duplex with a footprint up to the 50' x 72' size pad. • �e respectfuliy request our favorable consideration of the Amendments. The Y Gonyea Addition, contiguous to this �ro�erty, is full evidence that the requested changes and proceedures will generate, finally, a completed development that will be compatible in the existing neiahborhood. � � � P.U.D. NUMBER: 24 CI7Y OF GOLDEN VALLEY . APPLICA7ION FOR CONSIDERATION OF � � PLANNED UNI� DEVELOPMENT ORDIIVANCE PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLAN DATE OF APPLICATION: July 13, 1987 *FEE PAID RECEIPT N0. ' 140.Q0 - ' n • _ ;�' r. APPLICANT NAME: Dennis D. Gonyea PHONE N0.�612) 377-0191 AODRESS: 50 Groveland Terrace Minneapolis Minnesota 55403 � Number_ & Street City State Zip PROPERTY OWNER: Anthony M. Zappa, Jr. & Dorothy P�. Zappa PHONE N0. �612) 588-1542 ADDRESS: 4850 Dona Lane Golden Valley Minnesota 55427 Number & Street City State Zip STREET LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION: Southeast corner of Boone Avenue North and Plymouth Avenue �EGAL DESCRIPTION (Attach separate sheet if necessary): Lots 1 through 8, Block 1, Outlot A and Outlot B, Midtown NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE PROPER7Y IN QUESTION: (Attach to Application along with an area Half-Section Map.) TYPE OF PROPOSAL: SMALL AREA: LARGE OR COMPLEX AREA: RESIDENTIAL: X COMMERCIAL: INDUSTRIAL: BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL OFFICE: INSTITUTIONAL: MIXED USE: REDEVELOPMENT AREA: PRESENT ZONING OF PROPERTY: P��nned B�nit Development PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY• Subdivided for zero lot line dup7exes, four (4) duplexes on - *Fee for PUD Amendment $75:00. � � _. � PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY (Attach additional pages if necessary.) The proposed use of property will continue to be four (4) duplex buildings. No replatting is ro osed. It is roposed that building pads with a footprint of 50' x 72' be approved and t at a revise an scape p an e approve . ese approva s to e in t e orm o an amen ment to the PUD. The nrop.osal is that there be no specific building elevations as a part of the approva . It is propose t at up ex u� ings up to t e size o t e x �prin-E be allowed, subject to architectual approval by petitioner. STRUCTURES: NUMBER; 4 TYPE: Duplexes � HEIGHT: NUMBER OF STORIES: AMENITIES AND/OR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES (i.e. Tennis Court, Pool , etc. ): ' _ ___ __ _ NUMBER OF PEOPLE IIVTENDED TO LIVE OR WORK ON PREMISES: ADULTS: CHILDREN: NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES PROPOSED: ENCLOSED (Garage or ��K��t�X��d4�) up to 16 Driveway: 16 NON-ENCLOSED Parking areas: 8 TOTAL ACRES OF LAND IN P.U.D. 2.37 � � Total : 24 DENSITY: (Number of Units Per Acre) 4.2 INDICATE THE FOLLOWING DATA BY PERCENTAGES: AREA COVERED BY STRUCTURES: 15.87 q AREA COVERED BY OUTSIDE PARKING: 7.32 i� �AREA COVERED BY INTERIOR STREETS: 5.86 % AREA LANDSCAPED: 30.52 9� NATURAL AREA AND/OR OPEN SPACE: 40.43 °6 PONDING AREA: None ZONING VARIANCES: List below all variances from the standard zoning requirements that will be requested as part of this P.U.D. , and the justification for granting said variances (attach additional sheets if needed). The amendment to the PUD includes the following variances: Lot 1; Frontyard set back of 21'± and rear yard set back 29'±, Lots 7 & 8; rear yard set back of 26'±, side yard set backs, between buildings of 5'±. I HEREBY DECLARE THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS REQUEST, AND ON ADDITIONAL MATERIAL, ARE TRUE. q� ' / �1 Signature of Applicant Date � . ��7',�, s /3 c�� . S�gnature of ope wner Date �� -t�� ' F ^ r •, •• j fj rt��4 ' �p ��}Y•r:�'� f w.�t • ' ` ��r i'�� `l .��•' ��•�� ':�' )d � , ,_.i, . .i r�'� ��.0 C�3",',��.��'.,,,. P J�,��l � i 9°y� aA'+. /'" ;.�+''��„I N; � ��'� ..� . . � q'( � . . •?-� �••' •J`�`'�?�:5:£•':'� f�. ....�' ,� ,'.: � ��,g�w .��p,�,cfz��.f>`?:=?':w • �✓ � .'� � "o � Yfy:: 3y� .✓x .J'� �. � "W ♦$ ::::i�ff .��{i�S . J� y �q YS� . ��,"',f f�.�`�t r r �� .�'CS:.�i,,..J' ..•' � ��•• !� �. Z .:�.'� �' ,F'�'� i,�:in . y.°"J �,r� ••.....�� ,�o"'.�.�.�.- .3 , . ' ,:� . w` �'�� ✓'✓J'� J �Z t .:,�,.`�.`� � ;Y::.:'��,,+ `��a"' ,� .'. d ��W° � !:. ��y�f,�° {`,.. J`�:'•: �.+`` ��p,+a•"� ... . �� ':"'o`.,... :. . r.` t�. � "F'�f .`6� F°'� . `� ..+`� e'��P' �t#P>,�X,.<,' d"" ; . � ,� ,�s✓�'% ci,;,. � ��'. ,��@''��, � . . . '�, �.. '`�r�"•:'...„�%y.`: } EXISTING ORIGINAL PUD � '�^' ��.'� .�::�^ y.' :�$`� �' �•, rJ,, � +, . D ; �'�°%!i::::�.": �.: �rr� 'i (� y $ `�/�•;•�.''?i:.,•?.' � Appraved by the C�ty Counci 1 .,�°�`��'�'��r�. � ,f� ' ��t..�'� r' � � June 2�, 1980 �`�.,,_��,..�r'f �4�``�� ...�..€�� ;�� ,3 �`d��! �,.��;...�, � `�� , � +t�i�'�.'�,�7 ��`��.n'...�.-. �..-i � .�;� �� !!/� � '`1 � � � f+ .� �. �7�+`��j,� ei•', \. ��yy�..�.��•....�..�..... �p��A 3 .-�','�f � � ��,�_•'`.,>: aL� -z�.,,,,,.�..._ � ` .• ............ •�f' `.�:��J''��J ` � �� ' .��. �,� .,' ,�;i'•:••:�'' .r.,. • •�"•.•'`"�^�;3 .w...,. ,•f �� , ,b. -� �° "�' '�+"•.`' � .. . �„; s f,, ,.:. :�.. � : •.. �+ r'�•+ . '•-.� r,f'r�JJJY' � '...��'` !��r'��,,'.s"•"° :$'"a„'�,� } \ . *. ........ , . � �� .�- ,,s�• ; �, ,�,�,'..'.'•' :�V ° � n -'° ��," ��` �:� ^;:��.:�s�°'` � OUT�OT 6...... . : .�, ':� . p�g@ ,s. :. �-�.. ��yd"l.?°' � ��;C..'n y^•r'`� : 44 � � '+�� r�`1 .. ^ ' � . .� +.��' • . t �� (r ��.�.'.3�.•�.�� :,, �N V�,,:...:•,+`•^... .d. � F'`";F,.e < � �'+ �r '3�:: ��,tt s,•. . j'l✓,`.�::�,::��Y � ` �; %a . . ':3'� £.°�� .'�` s �r..� S N�. r',:y.;�:,� ''.: . i`. .3;`� r r p g..M.".;��.'��`,�,iurt� , i w`,f �x' `:* ,,,�; `e`. { ��-<.�`?�C;'i'�'� � :', a ,iv,.Zl.�,� � �i��+ •• . � �', �`� T� w'�� ::�;,��;�a�' .+� �_ � • x� xs c j �� •-�:` '_�u ,,;� <� �`3 $� ,S :R 44 d.7 N . ♦ .3 .-'��a , �y�" a�'�T. +�J N '`.�'S.I�� Sx.'� x.� � x.� '`.,� . e�"`�;'�,f�°� � I/- ' $ 8:>`• � �o .p � �..>. '�f\�' ''�+ . �' ,`. k.. ' � e� f;�?.,.: v; �y . .e` � '� . ( (05.Lt' �'�f =�.�:�: ., .. � .. I �p :� ,?, � ., °' .,�:: ,�:° �'`��,Y �c �a ... ��- r?: :c' , r 6'14 `� .f.... --• � a'. ? .+�,,`�< �.' a. F �� ~' ' .�:? � y. • , ?; i � � �� £ ``�..�� `�., o `� 896 �' � � �� : ;< :�3 � � ° �,.. � ' � _� �`� . �$ ��-2<. ; � ° { �:aa. 9 � � •.� � . ....�.ci � € ° +i. . � p� , .e r; � �� ' - 3 0 4 °° . � �sg�.� .. �� , � � �' r` fj 9�l.� ��` , � � `�P ��• - t� � :: qw�,` F" .! `i 3 j M x>,, :�. 1. �4.L \ � ` �' ::� ; �a,�'`�,'>`�, . ' �• ` i a''s; �(, � � �� s:. t "'V \ � ; ` # �w:.�� q ��•.\M.. .�: '�� ' ''•, • � ` ,`- .2 \ a.. ��.. :. � . : ; �5 . � , . .:�..: : s. :�a�., . , : � ` :.. . . <>:?c: � ' N' �. `14.6 '+ f�9A. 81410 38A' � :-•w'. � ��. \)3,.':�l �t �tb�1�<�'I' STCi' � 3G;� 4 y .b `,1� �. P �� , t ' ,...._.-� E��,, "�.,, �� ,a. - . °o" " ',�.'' . ; ' E��T. cb 1of t �kx�t&. �.8 Z.Z4;: 94.7st+� �': �'y'�:.1�.583.D� '� w;:'.�. � ..9j/�� .. - 1`,ib� � , H ?.�.�'. 1�`�.,E; . 4A, xF:;>,.., �'�;�s •$ �SIw � ';�• . a/s 1 ' �� ,"�,� i� 4 W.o' 9n4.b °!3. �O a �o �� ^y F � .'e, `' �°' � 35 4 `�� 4 9 l�Z , ��, TLOT � � �.�� Z �Z r� �� .�y � � ' t� � � • �\ `� � �f; . «�-.. °'�`. �� , r �Z ' •: �:'�'�' ;j' � �y ::i.. 9 ` . � � t � I �,;. 9;.} ��Z.S" : ,.,.,�e.,:_ „�,,;...., � �z ', . 95•8 :F � ,� .j�. . �•>.'s: � �5 W p : ;i' '`� � '�',>e :•i•: '�N � B�S• `) ■ I � ; i: t',.C� {I1 t .p ' t�Y'��: �; �l�C• N� �Q '..i � a��'�: �> ° s r��1 � ` �h � �'�l Q ol baw.U+v�3 S o3 —— a . I . � f ! r r G \'� ,L,y,; o• ..IH.t4 ; �" $ _ ' � . : p . �3 � � ` �. yfqt,��i .,F,........: �QH a1 ¢ � 2�l:M4':.;} 1c7p .•^+ . .D�N O �. `i�. '. ��4 L.�'2,�''i,�,o, x ..:��!• � T� (.�°•`' Q'O'O` E • ' . � � � , 898 . '4 �:• . . ,�vw.w.... wwao::�`� : � ��:,.. � �� 4+�.45 a'', . �,' `� ` ._ ,;... . , , � :. , .., � � b. I � t �r' ' w^"w,':,r � `�;� ��: E� �{ s` � � S9 ; ,,�,�.,�. r�?'i„b t4a . .:., .�� . ' N+ �`? .,::�•.:;.`�.�„'.'�':.;;� .. z, �J '3100 .a.• ¢ o`�Y��.�.�: "� g� �x•3� � ! {�J• �� ''�A� ��P 6 0'; � y •M ...??:, .��f°�° �'r 4�_ �:'. �,�` i �.•�:�" ti"` .. j� ��' .V�►'A' - r f,F:`.:.:.."�� . ' ..., : �... ^r.... � . �� '�:: 96�L.°` ". •�^.•;;:;'Y„ "" "::± � �� J � �3 ' : '?�^�• .� ,, ...�• . : ..,• : � :M w,M. ..•�' �p,, a�� ,.� I ' V\ �' ' � ,\^wrt.r,.� ... • . ..�,. ... . .: ..::,. .:� � �y+S .. . �s+a,.`�'`' .° �e 1 Z GP1P(�('.� �� f��' :. �a . .:• e � � ,, '`. ��`.. �' �x, " "�...r , ..,... ..;�... _ ��, ' ,,,aroo� � � �an.y�$ �roca '2 :� } � ! .�'�,",'..,..x. � ��T`�" �rJ;.. ' � ... ' • i �....�' .x� .aZ `�,,.,,..:. ^�wv,w a�q � . ' + �� `�,0.''•�t ,'" py.b"'• «>,.`f, aj.,.,t.j "�^R..^'�,.,,�"�� ..• �„a`� I I � .� -j� `�... .� �;Y.�'� I r� }�� ....��, 'w.� Y:Y.��i,�5':;i� = y�"� i.:af `�<Y+ � . '9'• ,M�m,,.�e ��' +'�row � . 3........,.,. ... � �'y � '�wv�•. • � r...�...' `N � "4`u?t� w i ....w...�. •, . . + ��'�t� . . . �.: "'"�' .� Ci1 v.t•�'° ....-- ��• . , facisr-.tuV, 6$tfs6( — . "^° �'�TI� . . � � �� r•►NV.ag�'� � �� .... �, � .�,,.,...,,... .....,. � � � . ,,.,........... .... �' •w.. � � �u �.�.,..,..,,,., ...«................... .._„�: �r�`°�°,s�' ",•�.."..�,. .�;�'r�.J� kl�D"""�,�. """°""" "ro"°ro°° �• ,�,,,-., „ Ex�sr INV.884.3z . • . , .. . . .. .....�T�-H ' . ... M . ....,,.. . ..,.....:. - � �,.�,...... . . ..,,.,.,..,,...�,.,,,:,,,..,�,y,�„V„� .................... � '��' �"'iv,� A�P�ee�:�Y�„i�t : . . � .. ::• . � � ��°°� �° .�""""`.�"�.°M°a'.°�::�;:��::�:".:�:�.:::::.�.�.�::��:��:�:�="��.,.�.�.::��.�.��::..:�w:.:�..... ... :��. m .. . � . ;. � .M. . . .. .. .. . .. � � ,�� 4:�� .�... w.._.�..V....w.�.:�.:�.:: �� ;. ' .,.�a9 �,,,,�^� � ��.„�,. ... ,.�°- S . ► -• - ..� ��i -,'`.: <�,,�..��1•d' . ', ,`,'•�' .-'��:: '� �£�� ;;��;s'z.�� ,..� � . .. ,�� ,� , �t .� : � �� .�.. �'a:;,,,.:- � • •�,,, •,;� �,..• /' �gvc• ' P y�'.f'c';f��.• .. ,. i .�:.s r , l ,.. 'v'� ,.. �:`•f`,�.$��;� . •.�` � �'` '� �..��f�,• c.�.•^'° , '� ,s'-� �.., d:. . ,� ��" �.�` ,.�'' a �... , �,•% �' �` •:✓• jy, �;. •• •� L�'3 � !� � ' .i�Y� �. �:J}�4:' _j �� •�.`'�+�� :" J•" • .0 s�� .'�� : ...+.^"' • f �qza�",�r d'�� p C"J.l,�i r�y } ...�:: r�� • �f ,y��+ .N �,!`�'+�, t.:�: .'�tJ' y�3. � ` ��y� ' . i � � i�... .,.., y F . fi;iC ✓ ,,/� y'�.M ��7:'Y�> ✓`�` 4 : ' a� y� .R� 'r .£" f'. Le �`F,'y,.J'' �`�t?� S, i +��i✓' i.•`>'+.+ � � �,�:��i/�r+` ,�. ...v..,, : � ,.,, `''%r•::+•SS'q'.1�; � PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED PUD AMENDMENT :::.�•� ,.� �''"� �"'"~•, ;. � '; ��>;;+•�;:, �•�r+ .. .�y� �`y .� � ,��'��`s�✓•ja ' Preliminary Design Plan approved b �'`� • : � : Y ��,;:�.��.... '�'E.�''�„1 :..�•,� ,� i � _. the Ci t� Counci l July 17, 1984 ,.�� ' f �� : ;,� ` �,� � : , i .,�''''� ��:.:�� .....� .� ,� � � ,,,,,, ;:,.��.::.:�::., ., , 4j. ,,,. "., �rs ,,,.. > ��; �,✓' '�ar' � x ,r ��'`�y�9'�"f�';;�'eF�' `\ . ; '�:d'l^t.:��`` •.......+ f� ��.,'`. g `"'2�t �c ° .F'"f ,.-°' � • ,�t�,�.�s�"',,;,.'�• ,,. aL• i •,,;�;�...... ;ts�. �:.'�:::`:::.v:�:.::. � c;, ,.� 7i """,� ' � ,�..-.p_ �� ' J✓J ..i � ,,y��; �„ ,f, � �,�\, 4 4. StlE�p�i�'...�.+.... v^rc"" � l 4 1''� � . .J'�i�+• � CI.?+� V' � ` ` 1.,� '1,�..�oY`......... .. � (/�1J � C L� ff+~` `�+�� J � � � � ,�Y � �r`�J .:� 'A`�rJ.l��f l��.�,.�,✓�� iv� � . : ,\ . . :".. � � pF: ,,•' � � 4 �� '^,., '•�, ,,,,.J° � r,.. , t �:>�s° ;...� > > OUT OT B..........�. � :� 'S -,.. �r' i:;��'yti`.;�:^'�ro�1j �.�3 � 1'� �'� ....- =.�%;�> � # 'e% 1 9 U�Sf � `" . �, .;�'` ��,•t-a�^" � f� �a � •. �N ..""" r{. t �j i� �,�.�'oF�.. �J"'' �`^f..i �.^' 2 + /� ` -'�g`. �°'-,f''r � ^,,ye.='`N;:^'��' � +,� ✓ PP�R'I�� E':•^— ; ; �r,,g�• .¢ , r i; r�..^rf .+�-'� E �,,... I�� i idjj,y;�;ya, 9• i `.? .';4 "C� �a:5 A,g,r �`"�d' ��' < •^�r � �a , t , �3 r�. �,., ' � �r :` . � :..�.J,�.•;., . ��wf�,..,� :r � � �.� �� . �� ; : �� . :.��,,� _ • ,�.�,,.�� .: � .,� ��.. ,� �..'d" r�— ' 'k � t�; `a,°. t'��- i��;��' �,,�.,�..�� z3..-'e , 4Z.V� a � � �,�°. ; �,� ,it : '�. �,�. :�>. . ;� �o .a.�c .d:p� S'o `14' b •^' �� .; �.`� .�. y � ' 1'0°)6��`+�i� _ Irte'PS:o � QriC�Q'tSP � 6 —� � •t � . ..t�,��'R',�:�. m � A,�t,c� �; L ��io S� � ?l a: � _�,�__ ;`�.% 8°14" �; ;s <`'.�: � ;'8�;,"'�° `+�£', � �.� r � 1 ../ � .«: �. . � g ,+��z @.° .iQ. �".�.w✓ �.' F.� -�� L ��:�:.A.., 1 ��; ti. ., � '*y. ''� f� �` •.q�.: \ : i� ` $�{`,' � a�` � ' ' t• � � � ' ?� t % } f'S•'�'s �''� � ' F \ ♦ � O £,'+ ' ' � �s.. � 1 j • '' g ,4'S80 tSE S3 Z .: • , ''�,. �. 3 �`;,� ,� • ''o �`�' a�:�' � . 4 A � � x�.,rj: � t�..�? � �. � o °�,;, ; : >. ; � ? .�„� �� .� �. ` ,,�,�,� �'� t '`°�•�` �,�� t \� "'�� ; �� s'� ` � �... t.�r,,,r. ''. 6�95:�., ,'.I �7 b�S;T �!,� 89jC 4 ?� ,� ;`€ c �° '` . . �# �.: � � i � S�v. i � �,, � ,troj,. h� :�:.c:. :� ,, .; . : ' I � �. � �t` � ,� ..�• """', � :�� '�., � ;��•'.� '��'k�,6� `'.1I�3 .�.... i,.... �� •� l �, µ ' � � „ �� Y • £ '* �►. � N °' '*, ��s'�,,�''f+ �jZd�J1 9s.6'�'• '11 �i 41 �i �:,. q � ` •.,,. '� . - 3 � '��` ' r•S�, �,6.:li,e' ,Y�: �.S C . `GQ �jp 8� �' \'l1�1J� d...,.,�n TEi[r•� .n� : ::" � ' =7 a'1r 89 i� . G�'yT � �-1 x a 5.6 Z.Z4�-� 94.7A't� D��'��'�'1NV.F��3.0 :��:;�`a� <t��'� r_�i q� ' ,, t` �i / � �9''''�� ,.'�,t'�� e , �4ra0; � '�.�, • ' � ,$"8�+�,!• 2 36 ,h5 d s d , �� $ ..�. ,b�� -b1.o a14.4 93. �o.e.. �° � q,��'� � ` � I; � ':< ` ��TLOT 95� ; `'� � � � s,`' 'p4 r�°°*,y � . � �. 1t 2 � , � ~ . � �� " �' ';Oi `,� ,1 �ir'.� 3 �-.._}'� €} � � 6qq�L �,..,., ,o / -0 q:' � ' : i� I ' •Y'e.c, `- �� , �i7.t E `�, ; ,..� . 3 �j""t`39�,} •'} t�l �', :�J ;�1� j •F � : ft � �,p�. 95.6 ;% �e i ; Sn � �� .� f , � p ! h :� �;x u+ g7 .65 !� �� e`' Q > �i � � # a � �i.",� s` s: �"'�s".;> 9 y �''a V : �' '^ ; ` ,� o �1 N ` :i �: -�y �::�' �,,,,;�s3,� � ; `,,,, �, �� - , '` . .. �� ' P(lS7�N ; ' �,: \ i Soo �,� '�` -- �..:'��I_ m y�q �, ;,�w �� ,�� .,.,� � . . , ��.... ;. � / ! ,. �" �` ��'�` g`18 : � '^ f A W�.QS � :�...� / ' C 1 � �'�. .• .~�i'""" � � �f 896; I��Q'1�SP� , .:�: �;.� ;:� £ ... .:•-:µ .. :. � g '/ ��'�'��'av�;;' `\�a�iD�E°�'� ' i ..;�'� ��'�s},�, z4.o :... ,r' i��^ , �; �, �- ,�' ,s'3'�i:�� ;,�..' ,.��Oc �G8-��3ioo 'o� .c�3� ��: t � }: � i � t ��„«.., � ,i A J�� T� Q� I.O`'i �1 S� M � i�2 � t� �$`,:.w.._� ��. �' 3tu �j ,'`'r,N".�,��ae� �^, ..� ��'- (NY. �.0 � pl �`� �' ��4 • �' � q $Z � '�.�. � :�`y;�: �O w.�'w.. ,.,��:,sa�:�,y t`....�Zi� a•, I �` l`� i`d� O�'� 3' E.� ..�..,,,F�. :�: �, ,,,,,,,, .., . ' ..., A ',�� . . . ' ' .. . ,. . _..... .. .,.�... �@ � e • 1570��JF: � �0 , .,. . ' �y.fi.��` '''��jp �� ,,,a,�, �.� ...�„��...::.,. Q:: "•• ...,✓� Qm°°°°°�.. �� !:,�'..��{ ��a '�" '� - ,� :.�.. ��i�Sz: `M- �. ��;;rM •�t �4' � ' 7�'.�i t'�,. ,. �s�: ,�, Y' : ".:.,...;.:' . ,.�•M�' A „ , f �, .c�y�y e:. v,n' ��.'�'"�� y;•y.�, �+�?.�..! ,� �J'F��,�JI : .� �•� uoawoee .�y,,.00,�. �....�,......_. ....,...,�....:................ • � ��,�� eo„v,p� �ww. "'"'M"" �°'�,�. lS v,00 r � , ,>"�"�� _== .�m..w� �.,�p� .•,., �£x�.��(att'E��pd'�''�Y��`� '�'+,��a � �:�,�" Exiar��,b84•4�„�" '�"°" , „�"„�;;�: .. .,�..,�........ .... . .. ... ...... '��°e�� . ";°°N°�.°"°""`YE,,,,,,'�{"'r -p �`v �,"'"'" ,�,� �,,,°�„� ,m,,,�, ,.,�,Ex�sT INV�8B4.3z.�'To-, .. . .. �....r. .. . � .,,......�. ......y ., ��.�.,.�,..,�.,.,�.,y� ,,. . . �,�,., .� A...,�.,�. ...... � . .........�.�, ��rn,p . f��"°' ''� ��„�F�P .�....�..._,.r . - .... .�..... ..,. .. . :�rf� �T aFTYI.�NC. .. ., ,�, . ._, .,,.�..„ .. ............. ...:.... � � ..,�...... . ....._.. .. � . ..v.......... ......... .:... .� . . ........_...,....,,........., . .. . ....:::.... � .:..�................�. ... ._..,..... � � �°�' .,�- i .��°°., � �` �� `�,...�...�..�...�, .�.�..�:Y:::w...�:.:�-.V.:.:::-.::..:...�_.M.�.w.._....�..:�..�..�::..::. . �� . � �� ;� �� July 22, 1987 T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development SUBJECT: Planning Commission Review of Land Uses for Expansion of North Wirth Redevelopment District I am enclosing a copy of a letter from Mayor Anderson to Gary Prazak regarding a request by the City Council for the Planning Commission to review and comment on current and future land uses for an expanded North Wirth Redevelopment District. The HRA is now considering the expansion of the North Wirth District to the west to include all the area bounded by Highway 100, North Wirth Parkway, Highway 55 and the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad tracks. The HRA is considering the expansion of the District in order to assist in the redevelopment of areas west of the existing North Wirth Redevelopment Area. Areas of particular concern, where City assistance may be needed to get the highest and best land use, are the area around the old Holiday House Motel and the area near the White House/Golden Valley House. There may be other areas that may also be appropriate for redevelopment. � I would like to suggest that the Planning Commission respond to the HRA on this issue by October 1, 1987. The Planning staff will be preparing a proposed work plan for this �and use study and have it to the Planning Commission at the August 10, 1987 meeting. If you have any comments or suggestions, please contact Alda or me. Enclosures � - ,.A<7�-'.°'y • , � t +i;� � "�:.T `i E' R `:.�} i%aF�:i�Y..�-'.��>��L City of Golden Valley July 22, 1987 Mr. Gary Prazak, Chair Golden Valley Planning Commission c/o 2016 Ensign Ave. North Golden Yalley, NDd 55427 Dear Gary: The Golden Valley City Council is requesting the Planning Commission to review and comment on current and future land use in the area north of Highway 55 between Highway 100 and Wirth Parkway. We would like you to submit the comments to the HRA and the HRA staff. The HRA has ' requested the staff prepare a proposed redevelopment plan which would � expand the North Wirth Redevelopment district to the west. It would be helpful to have the Planning Commission input as they are working on this. If the HRA ultimately decides to recommend to the Council an expansion of that district, the Planning Commission would again have the oppor- tunity to comment on the proposed plan before the Cauncil would take action. We would appreciate your attention to this review in time for staff consideration as they prepare the proposal . Mark Grimes and Alda Wilkinson are prepared to work with you on this matter. Cordially, � �`��,�� i Mary A Anderson Ma,yor MEA:pb .• cc: Mark Grimes � Civic Center, 7800 Goiden Valiey Rd., Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427, (612) 593-8000 •��.•('/'�� .�. �— •Z�• .-c -. � ( :.:( ' ('� .�'(� ' ' �i � ,� �� ' ��J 't�r.i j.�,,- l �, •,• : � -- a / .i • �jr'� r ` , j' .,c•(T•..f. �.. �•:��' - f ') �`• :';\:�! .. i �. ' ..� �.;. �:' :..!' ,�' .I.r ;�r. .`•/ � . ,r =`• � �� -(" '•� ''.� : •. .� � . ry�t'i�b� � ,-.� < <..: I, ,;.,;, .-- •. �,.,; . .j�� ,� :. . _�C r, ,"r� •� <-. 1h)1 c";a t'' �. . �..: � •�• _.i; �.�,�� s�;r�.��. t. "t��:•:•�t k� • f''��:.�,.t•• .�`!bd ,.•, ;., r.• F.^� � r, f �. ..�i.,. � ��, . ,. .,:; ./ , �{f��l:.t"•.`( ��'� r �t'l!'� �/V�t••�' ..•r.��' � 1 ifir:'.r��1:.''�. 1r' �i.F�:i- -� `�(��'1 H1� � (� �'� � �}�J� '�.^�; il, ��•�{Y.!�. �r'1r�"��i.�.L�„s'Y�,r.`/~�•Y�• �*" `�/+.��b:t.��a � �i.4••i' i1�� .f.• � FI ��JJ�i�,�•�,�/1� •� ��5�,-��1.,� . �f-;>� ��:;�•��r:�-Y ' :..�r ,.•; �, . `� �: 'L�:�,��.�•.� t ` ` 3�tvda� � -��—'�'w/' �s1;',.�(�?.!�;.: M.�•�•_•�;• ` I �— -. - ' ' :`•'., ';�'%:•.'`• � � .� ' �- � I ,�.NN.- � 1'�"��'., ' •^:''" z '%,;); � a-' 'a � �--3Ntl�—?�j`��. �`..�';..� '::1�' �.'��`'i:"3•, ;-r s' s°'. � � ;, .. ,,'.•�.�t..j;�;�.�' ::;1..� .�� g,¢ (�J � O � �i�� ; �••� .�1 •- ��'�\.�,�^• ��r�, � , >_T—_ a ;.'.^.�:�• :',:�.�;�{.Z.�'��,.,.I•1?,� ' � '�'> C Q 0 Q (f� � i`,�-�':�:� •,.�; �'i �•�., ` '� \ i N I -- �- � ` _ -.�. �..• ',.� �'` ,' �•��; �1'ti >��:�'� OE I_'l --) '`� ,,� �1• � �' Z 0. r � �----- s J '; .,� . , :; ;.:�,. . � �3Nd1 --� Z a, '� '� ;,;,:,�•.• � :�s .; .��'':�,•:,'�!; Q,� i ��, � � � 7► �I OC W = � ':•�, ,;`,�}. �'�-'•"„4'�3+�';��'?,' ^ � ;I � ! i �--"--� Y I' Q J :�••;, �. J � . • ; •,�^' ;;;!•:•^:��,:... ,-v -:,, +� a, � L J O � �:: ..�.,:. .• �; �.�- r• ��;�� • � �,-� NdlaNi�o ' }- 1► a Uf = � �. } 1 • 'i'�j ',Y. ,n�1! . 1,'!^��'� .r, � i� � ..Z.��7�r.�' '�f�„� •.��y�,1'��•�ir~~ � X � „ j 1 � �� I 'O �•i� '.. !�. ;;1� �•;j .n/�. . ��•.�' W ti-I�. � '^�� f la •• •��•i;-.�.� :" .'f.��' w a��•..+s � � I ,.I, I �.�''� I� �.�� ','`�.�w.•,�.'�`�:��7� � � � �� Ja O L W 1�.�-� � � •.. � •��. .�; ;1 ,. .. L a � ',;�=j'�Y;�:;� .,,;.; ,..; ?;� �2�' .;�. � ,!�(;� p W � �•` ' •' � ! �:�j• �� . ,,1, ,w, � ' � � ��, .� • !'3'�...�!�..' .� '.1 • .,y ' 1`Y-'�.?' ' : +� ;,�.... .,': �� '�: �.. '•' ti� � �� ' . s �i,. -��.. .'�;y .. �.�l�s�� ; i � f"1.'';i 7. . i , ^ , 1.,��,..,�;;;;,•�;...�,;;, ,;�,'n.�'�' ;,; r •ao_� `},�, � \ ` ` ` 1'� "�:"..: •. �1 ,� . .J�� /^t;. , � •-' VO A,.��^.��7^.� '�•.1.�'"'�..,�li��1 �� ♦ �L � 1I �� W b, �.- . . -;. ..: �* � �.�. ,� • 1. . .,,•.� �,*�,��'`"; i. ; 0 � ,,., ...-..��, .^:- .,. , ►.-. . �' ,l pc ,-� �,'•�•. .•'�, �.ti. i ��, �„ .+* '-'� ��.� -, - . ,��,�:^.,,..:�.-„;:n~.s.� I � —c!� Jf�– '► .'R•T ,;*.�•s`.:J•''�!.: � I � �I �\_ �/ ` �:��?�:jy�•�yr�.. .�. , - �l\ ��^'� �''��y'-?� � � c� �' e ----'2�a Z�OI '� � � �". �.I�'�''�':`'�'� � d�� O �`=^^� �,�;` .; � : ' .�'�.,'� r;� \t_ J . � .,;,:,• j -rJ ,^. , � �=.�.;• �•,.,'.;• :,.. •.:� � .r�:' . — _ �,;�:?��',;�,�,� ��;';�.�,.�:":• ;. �: �� (� �N �/�'G►_ 3' :;�_ '� � \1�•�:: i;� � � '' � -- - -' = 7� ' . - J � � �d I \ \ , . ,. ti�- � �, .\ � a, � � `� �`�,. � � o s�- �� ' ' � zd J , _ "r`� \ � , � �+- +� <t, � , �. o cJ � �, o � /� _ � Z _�/ �� c E '! � .(�� , � V �� \ �. \ O Q i I � � ` � � •r O O i �� . � _ _ /� N� S . � . - �_ // t0 > / ` � `J / X� W �,�2 ,:� �_ W � Nd _or __ .aQ __ �ti, h .� � � � _ _ -.-- ��;'� - - Q1� � �'� NI13W � o � U !� `� �� O Q-'r Q_ � �I `� , _ W — G1 �,3 � � �� I W _ o�-� �. !� OC�d-��' `�/Vb � o.. � J �,]r- �'d, ; . �/ V-' � ' � �j �,�� 0 N a�3 � L Oa3�01� � p��, I� � �, � 0 ,/� � G/�--�W �o� OJ �; —_4.i1 � � �i , \`� �Z Q1�" V -J��d - � Jll�Nn-��' N ' %� �`��°� 10 W' p � /. � , � �3 � �= r / ` � � '+ ----J~ _ . ' � \ _ ' � ----7� --- r— __-- - � � \� � ,'%� zi .�� I � ,Q �i �n ►- Z \ � �/ 1 X � � : Y �'2 '"13 jV� 2 W ��;, I � � V / ..� _..�n'� ,--�..� � _ F- v / �, - � ��- � �u�y 22, i98� T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Alda Wilkinson, City Planner SUBJECT: Year 2010 Planning Program Attached are wo.rksheets for use in preparation for discussion of the first two items on the Year 2010 Planning Item priority listing. The purpose of the discussion is to provide staff with further direction for preparation of the Year 2010 Vision narrative, which will describe how the Planning Com�nission wants Golden Valley to look and to be in the Year 2010. The worksheets offer questions for assistance in further definition of the � planning items and incorporate answers already provided at the May 9, 1987 Saturday morning workshop. � Attachments: Worksheets (2) . � � YEAR 2010 PLANNING PROGRAM PRIORITY ITEM WORKSHEET 1. City-wide beautificati�n pro�ram QUESTION: What would City-wide beautification consist of? ANSWERS: C1ean up (including along highways Planting (including along highways Addition of benches QUESTIONS: What is the perceived need? � What is missin� at the present time? What would be missing in 201Q without action? ANSWERS: � a. Beautification of Valley Square QUESTION: What would beautification consist of in Valley Square? ANSWERS: QUESTIONS: What is the perceived need? What is missing at the present time? What is missing in the Valley Square Plan? What would be missing in 2010 without action? ANSWERS: � YEAR 2010 PLANNING PROGRAM PRIORITY ITEM WORKSHEET (Item #1 Continued) � b. Beautification of Bassett Creek QUESTION: What would beautificati�n of Bassett Creek involve? ANSWERS: . QUESTIONS: What is the perceived need? What is missing at the present time? What is missing in the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans? . What would be missing in 2010 without action? ANSWERS: ' c. Neighborhood beautification � QUESTION: What does neighborhood beautification consist of? ANSWE.RS: Tree lined streets Trash off streets , Care for public spaces QUESTIONS: What is the perceived need? What is missing at the present time? What would be missing in 2010 without action? ANSWERS: � 0 YEAR 2010 PLANNING PROGRAM PRIORITY ITEM WORKSHEET (Item #1 Continued) � d. Beautification of corrrnnnercial properties QUESTION: What would be invol�ed in beautification of commercial properties? ANSWERS: QUESTIONS: What is the perceived need? What are the problems at the present time? What would be missing in 2010 without action? ANSWERS: � e. Beautification of public properties QUESTION: What would be involved in beautification of public properties? ANSWERS: QUESTIONS: What is the perceived need? What is missing at the present time? What would be missing in 2010 without action? ANSWERS: � � � � YEAR 2010 Pi.ANNING PROGRAM PRIURITY ITEt�1 WORKSHEET 2. Full ran e of convenience sho in and services in Golden Valle nei hborhoods as station auto re air, dr eleaners, rocer � sho in , etc. QUESTION: What is included in a full range of neighborhood convenience shopping and services? ANSWERS: QUESTION: How should geographical service areas for neighborhood shopping and service be delineated? What is the maximum distance residents should � have to drive to reach convenience shopping and services? APISWERS: � QUESTIONS: What is the perceived need? Where are convenience shopping and services lacking? Where are convenience shopping and services being lost? Where will convenience shopping and services be lacking in 2010 without action? ANSWERS: Services including gas stations and low-rent small service establishments are being eliminated in Valley Square and Golden Ni11s Redevelopment Areas �