The URL can be used to link to this page

02-25-85 PC Agenda -- - -- - -- �. _ .__ _ ..�_ ... } R_ � .. _ : . � ; i ; i � GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION ; i (Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road) � I ' February 25, 1985 ' � 7:00 P.M. ' � i AGENDA ; i i i i I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1985 i � II. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT � ; I APPLICANT: Church of the Good Shepherd ; i , LOCATION: 145 and 225 Jersey Avenue South and }� 6800 Laurel Avenue � I REQUEST: Approval of Preliminary Plat of the ' j "Church of the Good Shepherd Addition" j i III• INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT i � � APPLICANT: City of Golden Valley `! � � LOCATION: 6500 Laurel Avenue j REQUEST: Approval of Preliminary Plat of "Cortlawn Pond" ' � IV. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT � . � APPLICANT: City of Golden Valley 'I LOCATION: 7000 Laurel Avenue , � ' REQUEST: Approval of Preliminary Plat of "Laurel Pond" ; j V. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF THE PLATTING ORDINANCE ' I I, APPLICANT: Walter Kost and Sylvia Engwall ' I I LOCATION: 1101 and 1107 Orkla Drive `I 'I � REQUEST: Approval of Lot Division to Transfer a Portion ',j of One Lot to Adjacent Lot and Vice Versa � � VI. PROGRESS REPORT ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ZONING CODE RELATED TO � HOME OCCUPATIONS ' i :j � VII. REPORT ON HRA MEETING - FEBRUARY 12, 1985 ; I , ViII. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING - FEBRUARY 19, 1985 ' � � � 'j ; IX. PREPARATION FOR MARCH 25, 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY MEETING I i I � � � •� I � I � L— l` � MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION February 11, 1985 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN. Acting Chairman Prazak called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Those present were Commissioners Kapsner, Leppik, McAleese, McCracken-Hunt, Prazak and Schmidt. Also present were Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development, Alda Peikert, City Planner, and Gloria Anderson, Planning Secretary. � Commissioner Russell was absent. I . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 28, 1985 It was moved by Commissioner Leppik, seconded by Commissioner Kapsner and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the January 28, 1985 Planning Commission meeting pending changes. II . SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT � APPLICANT: Church of the Good Shepherd LOCATION: 145 and 225 Jersey Avenue South and 6800 Laurel Avenue REQUEST: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of Church of the Good Shepherd Addition Acting Chairman Prazak introduced this agenda item and noted the February 25, 1985 informal public hearing date recommended by staff. It was moved by Commissioner Leppik, seconded by Commissioner McAleese and carried unanimously to set an informal public hearing date of February 25, 1985 for consideration of the Preliminary Plat of the Church of the Good Shepherd Addition at 145 and 225 Jersey Avenue South and 6800 Laurel Avenue. III . SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: City of Golden Valley LOCATION: 6500 Laurel Avenue REQUEST: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of "Cortlawn Pond" � , Planning Commission Minutes February il, 1985 Page 2 � IV. SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUB - LIC HEARING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: City of Golden Valley LOCATION: 7000 Laurel Avenue REQUEST: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of "Laurel Pond" Acting Chairman Prazak introduced these agenda items and noted the February 25, 1985 informal public h�aring date recommended by staff. It was moved by Commissioner McAleese, seconded by Commissioner McCracken-Hunt and carried unanimously to set an informal public hearing date of February 25, 1985 for consideration of the Preliminary Plats for "Cortlawn Pond" and "Laurel Pond". V. SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING APPLICANT: Foxboro Corporation LOCATION: 1245, 1315, 1335 and 1411 North Lilac Drive REQUEST: Approval of Rezoning from Residential to Business � and Professional Offices Zoning District Acting Chairman Prazak introduced this agenda item and asked staff to review the proposal . City Planner Alda Peikert reviewed the request for rezoning and gave the staff recommendation. Commissioner Leppik asked if this would come back to the Commission as a PUD and also if there were any plans for closing the Lindsay Street entrance to Highway 100 and, if so, how it would affect traffic. City Planner Alda Peikert explained that this would not be a PUD. She also stated that there were no plans to close Lindsay Street but there were plans to upgrade Duluth Street and the service road in the future which would improve access to Highway 100 north. Acting Chairman Prazak asked if the parking was adequate and how many units there would be. City Planner Alda Peikert said she would let the proponent give answers to those questions. Mr. Lynn Sloat of Sloat Logan Associates, architects, was present to represent the proponent. He stated the building contained a total of 36,700 square feet of which 24,900 square feet were on the first floor and 11 ,700 square feet on the second floor. He explained that the building was U-shaped fronting on � , Planning Commission Minutes February 11, 1985 Page 3 � Highwa 100 for maximum a earance kee in the minimal amount of buildin toward Y PP P 9 9 the residential properties to the rear. The parking requirements for this pro- ject would be 147 spaces and they have provided for 155 parking spaces. Mr. Sloat also explained that they had tried to distribute the parking around the site rather than concentrate it in one area. Mr. Sloat explained that the pro- posed building would have brick walls, cedar shake roof and bronze tinted glass to create an ambiance of a residential a�ea, and that the two-story height keeps the building low to blend in with the area. They have off-set the modules to break up the roof line. Mr. Sloat stated they are looking at various ways to resolve the drainage problem and that it would not be draining from the blacktop surface to the west into the backyards of the residences. Mr. Sloat stated that any drainaye plan would have to be approved by the City and that the construction would comply with all City codes and ordinances. Commissioner Leppik stated that one of her concerns when a piece of property which is zoned from residential to another use such as Business and Professional Offices is whether or not the owners had tried previously to sell it as residen- tial and if this were the case with this property. Mr. Sloat did not know if this were the case. � Commissioner Schmidt asked if they had commitments on this property including the small portion to the north. Mr. Sloat said that they did. Commissioner Leppik asked how long the actual construction would take and if they had any ideas on the landscaping. Mr. Sloat stated the construction would take about six or seven months and that the landscapiny would probably consist of shrubs and trees. He explained they would probably use shrubs around the parking areas to keep headlights from shining into the residential area in the winter and would probably use larger trees to break up the landscaping. Commissioner Kapsner asked how high the grade would be between the parking lot . and backya�ds and whether it would be a slope or retaining wall . Mr. Sloat replied it would be roughly 14 feet but at this time they did not know if it would be a slope or retaining wall and that these were things they would have to look at in order to make the project work. Commissioner Schmidt felt that the drainage is the most important part of this project. Mr. Sloat stated that they do not have all the drainage problems solved but that it would be something they would have to work on. � Planning Commission Minutes ' February 11, 1985 � Page 4 � City Planner Alda Peikert asked how the interior was designed and how many units there would be. Mr. Sloat explained that the modules were 35 by 60 feet for a typical unit. There are ten units p]us two corner units and how they would be divided would depend on the owners and how large the companies were that buy the units. Acting Chairman Prazak opened the informal public hearing for public input. Mr. Wally Kovstad, 1220 Welcome Avenue, objected to the rezoning because he would be lookiny at cars whenever he looked out his window and suggested they maybe could put parking to the front rather than the rear of the property. He also objected to the rezoning because it did not follow the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and was concerned about the drainage problem. Mr. R. C. Johnson, 1200 Welcome Avenue, opposed the rezoning because the addi- tional traffic, fumes and noise would make the area intolerable. He too was concerned about the drainage as they already have some water problems. Mr. Pavlos Electris, 1316 Welcome Avenue, said they moved into their home in 1978 and have been trying to upgrade their property since then. He does not want to look at the cars in the parking lot and feels they will lose their pri- vacy. He also was concerned with drainage and does not want the zoning changed. � Mr. George Seiter, 1408 North Lilac Drive, had questions on variances and set- backs which were explained by City Planner Alda Peikert. Mr. Frank Tenczar, 1310 Welcome Avenue, opposed the zoning change. He also was concerned about the drainage situation and said that presently there are children that slide on this hill in the winter. Ms. Betty Ellgen, 1438 North Lilac Drive, stated that she and her husband were • very much opposed to this rezoning because of the traffic and accessibility. Ms. Ellgen and her husband feel more effort should be made to build single f amily residences on these lots. She also read a letter from her neighbor, Mrs. Fae Fay, 1420 North Lilac Drive, who also opposes the rezoning of this property. Mr. Harry Lucas, 1324 Welcome Avenue, opposed the rezoning because of the drainage situation. Mr. A1 Schuler, 1411 North Lilac Drive, was in favor of the rezoning as he does not see any other way to improve this area. He said there is more pollution from traffic on the east side of Highway 100. He also suggested they need signs to reduce the speed on the frontage road. Mrs. Marlys Johnson, 1125 North Lilac Drive, asked if there were plans to upgrade Highway 100 to three lanes each way. City Planner Alda Peikert said there are no plans in the capital improvement plan for the next five years and it is unlikely it would be upgraded in ten years. � . ,. Planning Commission Minutes February 11, 1985 Page 5 � Acting Chairman Prazak questioned whether there had been any attempts to sell the property for senior citizen housing. City Planner Alda Peikert stated there had been two people who had come in during the past two years to talk about senior citizen housing one of which would be combined with a medical clinic. Acting Chairman Prazak closed the informal public hearing. The Planning Commission had various questions on the drainage problems and City Planner Alda Peikert explained that no plans would be approved until the City was satisfied that it would not drain toward the properties to the west. Commissioner Schmidt asked if any efforts had been made to maintain this as single family residential and asked the staff to comment on what would happen in the future if this property would remain zoned for residential use. City Planner Alda Peikert said it could remain residential but it would have to be cost effective for a developer to develop the property. She stated that staff has suggested low-density townhouses, multiple dwelling units or offices as options for development. Director Grimes said a developer would be cautious before constructing residen- � tial units along Nighway 100 because of the fumes and traffic. Commissioner McAleese asked if this property had ever been on the HRA agenda and wondered what types of improvements were proposed for the traffic situation at Duluth Street and Highway 100. City Planner Alda Peikert said it had not been on the HRA agenda and that the improvements planned were for widening of Duluth Street and possible addition of traffic signals. Commissioner Schmidt asked if it were possible to put the parking in the front and Mr. S1oat explained that they tried to keep the buildiny as far as they could from the residential area at the rear. Commissioner Kapsner asked it it was feasible to put berming along the west. Mr. Sloat said this would be possible and is one thing they would have to study along with the drainage. Acting Chairman Prazak asked what would happen if the City Council approved the rezoning and the developer found it was not cost effective and withdrew their plans. City Planner Alda Peikert said that once any property is rezoned there is no guarantee that the developer who presented the rezoning and plans would go ahead with the project. It could very easily change hands and go to someone else. � ' Planning Commission Minutes February 11, 1985 � Page 6 Acting Chairman Prazak had concerns for changing the zoning and the comprehen- sive plan on the basis of not only a tentative development but also with so many unanswered questions. Director Grimes doubted that single homes would be built if the property remained residential and that multiple family use would probably create more traffic in the area. Commissioner McCracken-Hunt agreed that single family character is not feasible and that multiple residential units would create some of the same problems such as traffic. Commissioner McAleese stated he would like additional information on traffic and drainage and would like to hold off making a decision at this time. Commissioner Leppik stated she liked the plan, that it was very good use of the property with modifications for drainage. She complimented the developer on the presentation of a plan sensitive to the neighborhood. Commissioner McCracken-Hunt had concerns for the car lights shining into the properties and the drainage. Mr. Sloat said if the drainage situation could not be worked out, it would not � be in their best interest to complete the project they are trying to develop. He asked if there was a way to tie the rezoning in with this project? Acting Chairman Prazak said there was not. Commissioner Leppik said if it were not for the neighborhood opposition she would be for the project and that there are ocassions when you can bypass the comprehensive plan. Commissioner Leppik stated it was a very good plan though it has flaws and that eventually it would be rezoned. The neighbors should consider this plan or winding up with something else. It was moved by Commissioner Leppik, seconded by Commissioner McAleese and unanimously agreed to recommend City Council denial of the requst for rezoning of 1245, 1315, 1335 and 1411 North Lilac Drive from Residential to Business and Professional Offices Zoning District. VI. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED TO HOME OCCUPATIONS There was general discussion on the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance ' �elated to home occupations. Director Grimes will continue to work out the details and forward to the City Attorney. � , Planning Commission Meeting � February 11, 1985 Page 7 � VII. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING - FEBRUARY 5,1985 Commissioner McAleese gave a �eport on the City Council meeting held February 5, 1985. VIII. DISCUSSION OF ATTENDANCE AT APA CONFERENCE It was decided that Acting Chairman Prazak and Commissioner Kapsner would attend the APA Conference in Montreal April , 1985. IX. NON-BUSINESS MEETING It was decided to schedule the March 25, 1985 Planniny Commission meeting as a non-business meeting. Meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � Gary Prazak, Acting Chairman Margaret Leppik, Secretary � MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY � PLANNING COMMISSION January 28, 1985 A regular meeting of the Planniny Commission was held in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center,,7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN. Acting Chairman Prazak called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Those present were Commissioners Kapsner, McAleese, Prazak, Russell and Schmidt. Also present were Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development, Alda Peikert, City Planner, and Gloria Anderson, Planning Secretary. Commissioner Leppik was not present at the beginning of the meeting. Commissioner McCracken-Hunt was absent. I . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1985 It was moved by Commissioner Kapsner, seconded by Commissioner McAleese and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the January 14, 1985 Planning Commission meetiny as recorded. II . SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Foxboro Corporation � LOCATION: 1245, 1315, 1335 and 1411 North Lilac Drive REQUEST: Approval of Rezoning from Residential to Business and Professional Offices Acting Chairman Prazak introduced this agenda item and noted the February 11 , 1985 informal public hearing date recommended by staff. It was moved by Commissioner Schmidt, seconded by Commissioner Russell and carried unanimously to set an informal public heariny date of February 11 , 1985 for consideration of the request �eceived from Foxboro Corporation for rezoniny of the property at 1245, 1315, 1335 and 1411 North Lilac Drive from the Residential Zoning District to the Business and Professional Offices Zoning District. Commissioner Leppik arrived at the meeting. III . INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING APPLICANT: General Mills, Inc. LOCATION: 8800 and 9300 Betty Crocker Drive REQUEST: Approval of Rezoning from Open Development to � Business and Professional Offices . Planning Commission Minutes . January 28, 1985 Page 2 . Acting Chairman Prazak introduced this agenda item and asked staff to review the proposal . Director Grimes reviewed the request for rezoning and gave the staff recorr�nnendation. He stated that the request for rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation. He also said that the construction of the building and the platting of the property would require General Mills to appear before the Planning Commission and City Council again in the future. Acting Chairman Prazak wanted to know when the Comprehensive Land Use Plan first designated this area as Business and Professional Offices and if the east or west half of the property might be preferred for office construction by the City Engineering Department in regard to drainage. City Planner Alda Peikert stated it was first designated in 1976. Director Grimes stated that the Engineering Department did not express any preference but that the west half might be more accessible for traffic and have better visibility. Commissioner Schmidt questioned if it was intended that there would eventually be two buildings and Director Grimes stated that General Mills indicated there would only be one building. Acting Chairman Prazak asked if there were any other questions of staff. There were none. Acting Chairman Prazak recognized the proponents Mr. David Latvaaho, Real Estate Representative for General Mills, and Mr. John Schevenius, P.E. of the Engineering Policy Group of General Mills. � Mr. Latvaaho stated that they were at the meeting for the rezoniny only and that General Mills has no immediate plans to develop the property, only conceptual plans, and that they understand they would have to come back to the Planning Commission in order to pursue any further plans. Commissioner Kapsner wanted to know if there was going to be two buildings. Mr. Latvaaho stated that their plans were to build only one building but as yet have not decided on which half of the parcel they will build. Commissioner Leppik wanted to know what kind of drainaye plans had been deve- loped for the site. Mr. Schevenius said they had discussed a number of different kinds of drainage possibilities for the property. Flood storage could be on either half of the site as there is adequate space and that they could also put flood storage to the south of Betty Crocker Drive. Mr. Schevenius stated that they have worked with the Bassett Creek Flood Control Commission's engineers and there are a number of ways it could be done. Acting Chairman Prazak wanted to know the year General Mills could best estimate when construction would begin. � � Planning Commission Minutes . January 28, 1985 Page 3 � Mr. Latvaaho said they estimated it would be two to five years before develop- ment of the property would begin. Commissioner Leppik asked if the larye piece of property sticking down into the General Mills property was going to create a problem or if General Mills would possibly be buying and developing this property. Director Grimes said the property is part of the density calculations for Brookview Condominiums and that General Mills has no plans to obtain this pro- perty. Commissioner McAleese asked why General Mills was coming to the Planning Commission at this time for rezoning. Mr. Latvaaho stated it was so that when they are ready to develop this property the zoning would be in place. Acting Chairman Prazak asked if the office development would be for General Mills use exclusively and Mr. Latvaaho replied yes. Actiny Chairman Prazak opened the informal public hearing for public input. Mr. Thomas McChesney, 432 Decatur Avenue North, was concerned about sewer assessments and traffic. He stated he already had a sewer system at the �ear and to the front of his property that he has paid for and does not see why he . should subsidize General Mills. He questioned who owns Betty Crocker Drive and that they should abide by the laws and provide stop signs at their exits. He stated that it is very difficult to get on Boone Avenue from the service road when people are leaving General Mills in the afternoon. Acting Chairman Prazak assured him that the Planning Commission would look at the traffic issue when a specific plan comes before the Planning Commission. Michelle Poirier, 8925 Wally Street is concerned if the residents would have any input before General Mills started building on the property and that she would prefer they rezone the west half of the property to build on. Acting Chairman Prazak stated the area was one parcel and the entire area would be rezoned. He also stated that the residents would be notified when plans were more definite. Mr. Andrew Grega, 9145 West Highway 55, opposed rezoning. He was concerned about the traffic and what would happen to Boone Avenue traffic when they are working on I-394. Mr. Schevenius stated that the plans for upgrading Highway 12 to I-394 include plans for an interchange at I-394 and Boone Avenue. • r Planning Commission Minutes , January 28, 1985 Page 4 � Commissioner Kapsner noted that the new interchange would probably lessen the traffic on Boone Avenue. Mr. Art Mills, 416 Decatur Avenue North, was represented by his daughter. She stated that this area has been used by her father and other relatives for walking for many years and that he would prefer the west side for building construction. She asked that General Mills at least leave some of the woods. Mr. Mark Poirier, 8925 Wally Street, asked why General Mills could not build on the south side of Betty Crocke� Drive instead of the north side. Mr. Latvaaho stated he could not answer this question. Mrs. Grega of the Brookview Condominiums wanted to know if this plan calls for doing anything to Bassetts Creek. Mr. Schevenius stated they have no intentions to alter Bassetts Creek. Acting Chairman Prazak closed the public heariny. Commissioner Russell asked if the Boone Avenue/I-394 interchange would take pro- perty from General Mills or the Brookview property. Staff stated both. Commissioner Kapsner asked if the interchange is designed to alleviate some of the General Mills traffic. Staff stated that it would and questioned if it was to be a full interchange. Mr. Schevenius stated that it would be a full inter- � chanye. Commissioner Leppik asked who does own Betty Crocker Drive. Staff indicated it was a dedicated right-of-way on the street map and is maintained by the City. Commissioner Leppik said she can see no reason not to rezone this property but that there would be more input on what General Mills does with the property. Commissioner McAleese questioned how we have the discrepency between the General Plan and the existing residential development directly west of the WTCN building. The General Plan designates the entire area south of Highway 55 as Business and Professional Offices. Director Grimes stated that the homes were probably there before General Mills. Mr. Schevenius stated the homes were built soon after World War II . General Mills purchased the property beginniny in the mid 1950' s. Commissioner McAleese opposed the rezoning. He said it is a major step and gives General Mills some legal rights to the property that they don't have if it is not rezoned and that we would have more control over the development of the property under its current status. He would like to have more time to think about this and to defer the Planning Commission's decision to a future date. Commissioner Leppik asked what more information Commissioner McAleese would want before voting on it. • � Planning Commission Minutes , January 28, 1985 Page 5 � Commissioner McAleese feels that the Planning Commission needs to get a better handle on the planning aspect of their jobs and that the City would benefit from taking time to make the decision. He would like more information on the sewer system, the traffic problems that exist now and what might exist if a building were to go in on one of these parcels. If the property were rezoned, he believes that the City has less control of the development of the site. He said that the Conditional Use Permit procedure and PUD procedure does not give the City the same amount of control over development as does a rezoniny. Acting Chairman Prazak asked if he was suggesting they plat the property into two components first and then rezone. Commissioner McAleese stated that it would be a reasonable alternative and that rezoniny is a major step and gives them legal rights they currently do not now have. He stated that the Planning Commission should revaew the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and be looking ahead as to how it will affect the community ten years down the }ine. Commissioner Schmidt asked how long General Mills has owned property and if it had been zoned Open Development since that time. Director Grimes stated they had owned it since 1956 and that it probably had been zoned Qpen Development since then. Commissioner Leppik stated she could see no reason the Commission should not . make a decision at this time as the rezoning was in conformance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Commissioner McAleese moved that the Planning Commission defer the decision one meeting to afford him the opportunity to write a brief as to why the Commission should delay the decision. The motion died for lack of a second. Acting Chairman Prazak noted there were considerable questions raised by both the Commission and members of the community about specific potential aspects of the plan that will be presented to the Commission at a later time. At that time General Mills can expect there to be a very intensive look at the specifics of that plan and how it will affect traffic and the neighbors. Commissioner Russell stated she agreed with the process but felt the Commission would not be right in denyiny General Mills what they had every right to expect. It was moved by Commissioner Russell and seconded by Commissioner Leppik to recommend City Council approval of the rezoning of 8800 and 9300 Betty Crocker Drive from the Open Development Zoning District to the Business and Professional Offices Zoning District. The motion passed by a vote of 5 to 1 with Commissioner McAleese opposed. IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED TO RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES After discussion it was moved by Commissioner Schmidt, seconded by Commissioner • Russell and carried unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the pro- posed ordinance changes related to residential facilities. P1 anni ng Corrmii ssi on Mi nutes January 28, 1985 ' Page 6 � V. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JANUARY 15, 1985 Staff gave a report on the City Council Meeting held January 15, 1985. VI. ZONING AUTHORITY RESPONSIBILITIES PROCEDURES SEMINAR - JANUARY 22, 1985 Commissioner McAleese gave a report on the Zoning Authority Responsibilities Procedures Seminar which he attended. He felt the key point that was made was that cities need to do more planning rather than react to Conditional Use Permits, PUD' s and rezonings. He also stated that the Planning Commission should more carefully evaluate testimony given by the public. Meeting was adjourned at 8:40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Gary Prazak, Acting Chairman Margaret Leppik, Secretary � � February 20, 1985 i T0: Golden Valley Planning Co�ission FROM: Ma.rk W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development 0 SUBJECT: Informal Public Hearing on the Preliminary Plat of the "Church of the Good Shepherd Addition" The Church of the Good Shepherd at 145 Jersey Avenue South has presented the preliminary plat of the "Church of the Good Shepherd Addition". The 16.61 acre subdivision is located on the east side of Jersey Avenue South between Western Avenue and Laurel Avenue. The purpose of the subdivision is to divide the church property into two lots. The north lot, or Lot 1, is the location of the existing church, convent and school. The south lot, or Lot 2, is a vacant parcel. Lot 1 is 9.82 acres in size and Lot 2 is 6.3 acres in size. The proposed preliminary plat complies with the requirements of the Zoning Code. This property is currently zoned I-1 Institutional. Within this district, churches and schools are the permitted uses. The existing use of Lot 1 meets � all requirements for lot size, setbacks and parking. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates this area for schools and semi-public facilities as the property is now being used. � Adequate utility services are available to Lot 2. A sanitary sewer line is available along Laurel Avenue, Jersey Avenue and the east property line of the lot. Public water is available in Jersey Avenue and Laurel Avenue. Drain- age to Lot 2 will have to be provided by an internal storm sewer system that will be drained to the City ponding area directly east of Lot 2. Any drainage , plan for the development of the site must be approved by the City Engineer. As part of the platting procedure, the Church of the Good Shepherd will be required to dedicate an addition of 40 feet of right-of-way for Laurel Avenue. This additional 40 feet will provide a 100-foot right-of-way for Laurel which will be used for an expanded street. In addition, the subdivision regulations require a public dedication of property for park and open spaces. The amount to be dedicated is a minimum of ten per- cent of the subdivision or a cash dedication equal to ten percent of the land value. In this case, the staff is recommending the dedication of a 50-foot greenbelt easement running parallel with Laurel Avenue. (This easement is in addition to the required 40-foot dedication for Laurel Avenue.) This Laurel Greenbelt has been recommended by the Parks and Open Spaces Commission to help provide a buffer between the intensely used properties along Highway 12 and the residential neighborhood north of Laurel. It is hoped that such a green- belt will run along Laurel from Pennsylvania Avenue to Florida Avenue. When a building permit is issued on Lot 2, the landscaping of the greenbelt must be considered. The Park and Open Spaces Commission has made suggestions� re- • garding the landscaping. Golden Valiey Planning Commission � February 20, 1985 Page 2 The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. An additional 40 feet of right-of-way be dedicated for Laurel Avenue along the south property line. � 2. Prior to final plat approval, the City receive an easement for a 50-foot wide greenbelt along Laurel Avenue. This easement is to be considered the park dedication for this plat. MWG:ga Enclosures � h • .• � � • Revised : Ja 100 0 100 400 scale feet :eJee0RB5. 5 �d'' G8�7S NB8'14�� 'E �� R� ��-300,5 12 . S ' °yyESTE STERN AVE. s \6;�f;��.5- .�,.,',�b5� bby - ov ��c�l IU. 1 Q, �0 4 7 �� o` Z 'L�i w -CORTL�WII�I. e� W 4 r::� co ��0 Ni "'�'� coo � � ' •v� C � �..��g o�. �•�O ~ � A�'ll•�o o �'O 'Z a • � �c /� � T�;o m '�', � �' � .G� i � o°bF g,29i•o �� c,:• •�' 'R6530 `� J...i: �oe. a , a.s6) i�qa.. 3J^� � o � • �s o� O� o '�'e • 66 R�H °�'' :,�s � �=o g g °' ° °'�' �°NO ° RT , a,� .� � e �' C `'9•<< - - o ., < � r e i6 iro �Q�` .:� i -��l9ia 2 . � �oo , oo f•9. � W — 'a to i q+�°' �•�9.Sj^ p ^ � T�•1 48 N •'„ N 65 • •_e�•j es a s-t., > � • a ao r 5 4 _ �j � a • 14� 3 , � ~ � ��D/�,0� � C "r � ' � _ 5'��;9i /R � � 14I.�f�_�— �42.GG �, Q • _. 2 ^ C� V�ti io3'�� iaa �05 g—'_ - 'jj� � S? t �� I � � ; � 63b0 '� � 6 � ` �H., "'oi � 4 �i• a ;' 6 � _ �50." , : ;; V� �;- �� N �� 9 � Q m �' 14L 19 6F74 -' 66l0 .$' , o3't:�i 'O�i�_ _ � T.:o 5: ' I 'v. ['i1 Q`1O �.o �o 'io : . � ° � 12 �� =� � '�o io ,,�; UTH �.� CORTL AWN F 65��CI RC l � ^+ ?> 6E°� 6El5 .sr �p�. L�1. M ��'�� ;5� 00 � �`• 6 �• 5 �° � 4 .�.ao o � • a:�a.e • .� � � S;ECT/l3N D ; �y v, • �� •I � h•�3 '�� o.ass•�o$ � ` 24 i 15T 24 �I� (SS/5! o�o' � n a�9.i5 t--- -- �o e ry � Y � oi •�o zi� N C.hurc� ot ��e �io�� 4 ��: ' o � a w gi � ti g � 5,'ie�a.za � F- i5L.16 ISG-': � Z � o g HM �� 9 a m L•2o 6O 5:20 � i�o,4dT�20 )LONIAL ROAD � ; . C�� 6 5.1� N. •t 'i "E r::o- '��•tA�►tJ /A�'tG. OUTLOT 2 � � c.ry . ��, e I I ibp ' 190 .6 �:3.0 N. 'O5 �IS E _., .: o : i8c 5� „[o sa _..— _ 948`,f6.. Ss ��E. � < �AV E� $, �� ;_ ,ed F-.:-54� � �i•� � � °� s cg4�ao iyE - Z�,, s _ SB4't �r, �� I�/r"�/'�� ],S � February 20, 1985 � T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Alda Peikert, City Planner SUBJECT: Informal Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat of "Cortlawn Pond" Cortlawn Pond is one of two City owned properties which the City of Golden Valley proposes to plat at this time for purposes of property recording. The City intends to gradually accomplish platting of all unplatted City owned properties in order to clarify boundaries, clear title, and establish required street right-of-way and easements. The Golden Valley Planning Commission in May 1984 reviewed the first three properties platted under this program: Mary Hills Park, Rice Lake Park Reserve, and Schaper Natural Area. Platting of City owned properties does not affect use of the properties. Cortlawn Pond is a rectangular parcel 17.37 acres in area located on the north side of Laurel Avenue to the east of the Church of the Good Shepherd property northeast of Laurel and Jersey Avenue South. The approximate street address would be 6500 Laurel Avenue. The property was purchased by the City in 1976 for use as storm water holding area. City construction of a storm water holding pond on the site is anticipated in the near future. However, curre�tly pro- � posed platting of the property is not related to the pond construction. The City Engineering Department is planning to hold a neighborhood meeting in the spring of 1985 to inform neighboring property owners of pond construction plans and to provide an opportunity for neighborhood input into the planning process. Mailed notice of that meeting will be sent to surrounding property owners. The proposed plat of "Cortlawn Pond" is presented in Final Plat form rather than Preliminary Plat form. The entire property is platted as a single lot, and a drainage easement over the entire lot establishes use exclusively for storm water holding purposes. In addition, the plat establishes dedication of 40 feet of street right-of-way required for Laurel Avenue. Net area of the lot after dedication of street right-of-way is 16.17 acres. Preliminary Plat requirements necessary in the case of property scheduled for development are not applicable in the case of City owned property designated as open space. These usual Preliminary Plat requirements include detailed lot lines, building setback lines, street plans, utility plans, grading plans and detailed topo- graphic data. The City Platting Regulations make provision for City Council waiver of re- quirements of the Platting Ordinance provided there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that strict application of the Ordinance would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the land, provided the variance is necessary for preservation of a substantial property right of the petitioner, and provided granting of a variance will not adversely affect neighboring properties or the public welfare. The unusual condition in the � case of City owned properties proposed for platting is intent to preserve the properties as natural area or open space for the long term future. The cost of satisfying all of the Preliminary Plat requirements, which are designed for development property, would limit capability to plat property never intended � Golden Valley Planning Commission February 20, 1985 � Page 2 for development. Waiver of Preliminary Plat requirements for City owned open space would not in any way affect neighboring properties and would be beneficial to the community, which would otherwise share the cost of collecting unnecessary information. City of Golden Valley platting procedure calls for Planning Commission review of the Preliminary Plat only. Following City Council approval of the Preliminary Plat, the Final Plat is returned directly to the Council for action. In the case of currently proposed platting of City owned properties, the plats will be referred to the City Council once only for action on waiver of Preliminary Plat requirements and for approval of Final Plats. Staff suggests that the Planning Commission recommend City Gouncil waiver of Preliminary Plat requirements and approval of the Final Plat of "Cortlawn Pond". � AP:ga Attachments: l. Site Location Map 2. Plat of "Cortlawn Pond" (Full sized plan sheet enclosed separately.) � . ^ . _ g 0 . � O � � - v , � � _'' ''_ : ' , : .. Q . .�� ..a _... . . _I_. ........ ... .. ...•i ^"h'u� �•��... ...... •ca?1f9f1S2 ... .; � � � o o i 'Of��•' ' .efl�diY -•/rw�. �LiZ �o / OH- Lii \ `e T�— � �• F �h - '�p I '�� /�� 9 ~'^ � � � ~ � + / / , � , . N `_ �. N �` N � NJ I V� { • i ' ,/,-: � �^' �f T �� ^ � � � � s~ 'J /.� 'i %'./ �•�� m « ~� �� •,.�s � f � = �"e �„ N� %.'� Cdi �� w .i � /� /� ,�� : . . _ �+ =_� SC/ N . • - �eoi l�4S•. f► �i•oq Li/ i; f� � ' / �/�' `�j�, � �n d� �'{�I :.. -- � - ° �� - ; ,. d �� 0 �°* ; "��%�/�, /�'�/� " a s IM�`�03s � ,,_ . .t�N `' . ^ 1 S c5'M 5�o � •�.y,- �`°8 S �� , � ��-��, ° � - '7. .15 � Ot� �i-• �lb fl . �/ / � �� :' � +i M �'a.e2At S� 0l;�e, �..°�� .n ' � 1)'ri• i / � i � - ^ "'� e �; • �`I • ,��r�- o' e:�r-\��f ' � �'' N .Ni i b � • �.°.. O � - � �_ � 4^0 0" f,.'�. � ` . ner, . C s_ v '•�' o I /` � F- '� 9fnotll •O�' '4 � - � ' /� � %� 'n . ✓ 001 � OOf 011 �� g� � `'' •' / � � j c °9��0 01' oo� M ! i ,9, j` ,,�' �� . z aoN w�; _ : .o` � e � �i� _ o , ._ ` o a � � . M ��J �. — .n �Q � � N_;� ^� �6� e :�:�r N �rJ '� / / m � �o � �� j�r C � � ♦ � • % f � !f� m �1 �n ' SO/ :�i �.� y�,'o� q� ,'� ' . � � z � E' • � i' �- •' / �ppy' r ...o} i. sN N 6 � / . ' � � ��2 M.Cf. y 1 , 1 •.4d^•, j . r/�/ �t � �^va�ao��...�' = :r N W : � /i�� ' / � . ,..a �� W aa s � o�� r � j _ ^ �... � .�•,., � � •`v � ,J �-�j / �, � � ' � � N 3��0'J� '°h Q� ,� ~� �r a �,� / j� . ' ��'oe, �. ti �.^:. - �� 09 .� �+1 G •:�r • � i` '` _ _ oq � 5i� b� _ V � '%' ; v •�oy b9Z ti5 2 � T • _ � .'�.� � i i � •. ,' , ° � � z� a ^ !� P T � ♦� � � .� � ' N •o� n� rw v � �` N . � / ' .- I N � �ns o~ � ' 9, �. r- :� ; ,;,��n H • �A Z • � �. S�'�/w� /; . _ / i m •e` s�wZ '� a.°'�"` � _ ; ' / / o ��'9i •M$ ��o C / � Q � / /�'� .- .. � i � ~ ''2f 3N a-.. ,� '^� 911 � � �� ' ', i� / �' � I ( - ~ �o°� O IN o / ',i'" = �� 't�• � ari'� '��a„ � _ � �' ; ",�` �,� r-' � •.ta'ol a �� " o - --�o � � �n •r , . ;; ,i� �. no a � V o . - _�� !, c •� eI i Z o'�' ° / � � w� `. �� f & �� /'� / �� '` W , ,�_ �_ , • ��j.. e � O � ,— e � = cs� � / ,,r` / �' .- - "—` �a �+—� �YI O 52 0 � b o ?„ /�r� � � i/� �/ � � �i . O�„� b o :i ,�^ � i • a^o • O � �'�.^�[ b� ~n� �^ �O�~w b ..°.iq..'^� . c1 � �'� � � ;�,' T �✓d�, r r►`^ _ = b..� �it11 � / 90 05; � /. ,' n o' � LS foi Zf'►c. � ---- � So'vL� � � � .. ouc '�, sf.r�� o� .,.�,��> .2 a� *0 1 , , '�� y ��°�' 'nN d'iltlp5 :• ��> �� .., , , R� � E� . � �/. o ; ' _.�z�`-_ 'ti�'��:ti' �..K: . -- �' _.1-/----- o� _ J . � N � W , ' � i � � � • °� d . � r � b � Y {h i � �t � ��V `� r � Y ` � � p .� �� ` � t � i � � , � � � • � �` February 20, 1985 � T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Alda Peikert, City Planner SUBJECT: Informal Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat of "Lauxel Pond" The second of the two City owned properties proposed for platting at this time is Laurel Pond, which consists of four contiguous parcels with a total area of 16.3 acres located to the northwest of the intersection of Laurel Avenue and Jersey Avenue South. The approximate street address of the total parcel is 7000 Laurel Avenue. The properties included in, Laurel Pond were acquired by the City of Golden Valley both by means of dedication and by means of purchase for drainage and storm water holding purposes. All four properties were acquired from the same developer in 1976 at the time of platting of residential development properties to the north. The westerly of the two rectangular parcels fronting on Laurel Avenue was purchased by the City. The easterly rectangular parcel fronting on Laurel Avenue was previously platted as Outlot 2 of Rings Colonial Addition � and was purchased by the City at the time of platting. Outlot A of Rings Second Addition was dedicated to the City for public use at the time of plat- ting, and Outlot A of Rings Colonial Third Addition also was acquired by dedication on the plat. Storm sewer is in place on the long narrow portion of the property to the north previously Outlot A, and construction of two storm water holding ponds on the two large rectangular parcels is already complete. No further storm sewer construction work is contemplated on the properties. The proposed plat of "Laurel Pond", like that of "Cortlawn Pond", is present- ed as a Final Plat. The entire parcel is again platted as a single lot covered in its entirety with a drainage easement. In this case, approximately 50 feet of right-of-way is dedicated as required for Laurel Avenue. Net area of the lot remaining after street right-of-way dedication is 14.53 acres. Al1 applic- able Preliminary Plat requirements are fulfilled on the Final Plat except for detailed topographic data. It is suggested that waiver of Preliminary Plat requirements is appropriate in this case, as in the case of the plat of "Cortlawn Pond", due to intent to preserve the property as open space. Staff suggests that the Planning Commission recommend City Council waiver of Preliminary Plat requirements and City Council approval of the Final Plat of "Laurel Pond". AP:ga � Attachments: 1. Site Location Map 2. Plat of "Laurel Pond" (Full sized plan sheet enclosed separately.) • ��n � s, � ` N � � N � � � m • ' � � ` I v O� � � , • � ��v � r„ srs .. Eo�:�i -- �'0� r z�' � ' $ �^d �+..rt. s.t�r�S1N o9 i . `tio a� e• �o•ooi cs� c�t t°'a �°'9/ � , =o of � o�� aa� cra ort � o� // e . � -,-� � � • .-i _'y� �N � �� _ �p �� i �� O Q % , � i 9C00� . � O� � I � Q � , te�a z000r »� • - •� zo•av, t••e� �/:'/ , W . �, � � , � �! a = s .. o+ � • ' .. r -$ � - � - � � N _ /��'�' = � Z � si oo� � 7 • O' � � • • � ' �•. • Q i ,•�" r J I �y � �/..� � � v sOE OS •�AY 6ll FFi � f0 � � - v ..r 00 K S � F � ,,, d W sr ooi '� zF, o ,z ��I.�I�1N �� Z % V.� ' ' ;'� ° °��' v F- � . .. . oo p / ,;'`; " .r ` �; --•�� 3 � • �N � � a o � � _ • F o ; ;.j � - � _ � ,,P •I � �• � U ,� ' i � -•:-•- s So; eoi ., � o� 'w � ' ,. rs�o.. " �• oor �;'� '' ' S£ °� £6'7./ ti so/ FC c: • .. Sol ('•s ' `•'� : BG CO/ �' • '•�-` •. � N o � 9bFe 1azoi o .o `• ::-.- ; !�m • ; n'• ":�'^ �.a a � • h M•� •� , m � w ��/J��. ' � ;_...: l z ig C�rt s7 Bc foi ` � � � : M . �. ,�� „S !S;z3 sr• ii �� bl.c D r ? : � � �a,e r ��Pr �� SFisz9oe , oJ/ FEB6 � £42� ' � � � .LOx! ( ' �� OF. Otr � �I.�I _� SFZ�y /' ,/.. �� ; � '�I .oBlf No� � Bc og ov�Q ,., � �� eb '„� ',.p�f/� o �8f • ', � � 80.' fC � m � � s EoQ% szn oo. ' '..: " os - o I �� '�i Z` r •= N M• M1•� �' .� o Q��(V OrT. v�<FF � � - '^�'� z�� 7 , < J • s• � � N �J I L`LI � �� e.,�o.� t[�x, !o ec�� N r, � � �O � � ° � � �, � ' , ' �� to�o ' � ` '� / . . ' £06F/ .fi<<"/ SFtci �87t�c90/ 'f f c! Q \/OESS ._ � /� �.°�/,-�J .� apQ � I 4 � ��oae ^�� , � � � oaiH o"' F T:- ��s` 3• �� F �� ^ � � ; � ti �� h sii N sr� ,r ^ • ti� / / s' ^�i ' ; +�° s� a r 1 e s• � a z•,w� . .,''r,c�+v ` � ,, �'' , , a . , � I fiie �'d 9s� s96o Q •. �- Q . OF i � o /r �� M f ,% s' .'l�/`�' � � �/i W o� I -- C�T��/99(s� q y� p�yii�yWrt L v.� • ` ,O / ' j i'� � • • I� N I ^ OL�� 1=B'i0' V�Y�V Y R' O Q� � / Y�1 „� . C w li Z£; � /;'' ,? Y/6 f B� 7I fC'• 97A► 09 OS/��4 V e�, �`,F-.� �/l ,'�`j�� lawe 09 i I�; SE Pre ;i Oii�.10 °f,�rOfi ,�'. rita � /' J M s►. / / �uu0? cg • I : �D P F. ti�O�ON p, N1• �.I/(�f�� '� N %, ^/ �, ,l � ' 11 Q {` � � - � `�� I� � �tb/zi h soS6 �' p, .n � � � i� , � � �: ' ?,- � sB[E o«�S��NJ �ie�'S �r ' '��, � .,� �' � ` � � � % ,�a o `��'� 6�"�., s / �% a eT�; s z r •�o ;o � � �oi � e�� , •N s�t / � ,=" o If h o M � ,��N •� :°� 1968 B � � qo �t � r ',/ % � ,�►I+ : M C� 01 w 'o� �� fZ'fC' \�+ � � . �; , '%' �i . 98Fg co� �n Z � � a�: '— :.o�a. s�z� :'e�N ,v� ,��.•• - ;." , r _ � �o I�,1lo= �9 „ � / , � � a. � , io I .r /N•SS Ov/ /2208 ��5«�(J/ p �. �/ �� "�. I '� �� F�� i ,9G42�.. , � ti1. Oii � . /` %� , � �I° 4��' g �0i�� Ooi �O i Rf14�9�9 �r�, hp�� ! /% � �I1: �'� ms � � OFI O O/ �87 i00.�2� � �°.plfY � N v �:. �� /. °� � ,� i � O � r� � a i/'to d�2'So�.�� r. . � : :�� ` , ` ~ � � N !1 � M � �N � /O/ Q}p0/ �� ry • � N. r. N� 9Zl'£1 S�fB �: �,`` � ��fLii s�� 2tls i![t s[•oti� 9�� Z` � 3Oipi�£',v � , �� i °� J �; o?�1 j � �� Q��, o zl 9g eFi M bz Z ,, i ---�. W ( `� •"� ro� �S' � •g � �"—' �' �, O : � �� ►Pi� Gi� .�, : r tt� � V, o . � ; �' �trq;Og'r� Ss y�b.i'�6;ti.1s�t.P ��D+ �,''1�� `N� � M � Q � � � C. I ` � � �� :�y69ni • t �r ��9�r � ito.o :�� I � o J r N A ;,,��l v -rr��; � .El� � h� _ b � \. � � w � v i �e �'t/ ' • F�j; ii /Sp� i \ N I .:i°• �� v .f�v� el.80 � 7B.i�'4 6fop~ � � n v oE'ST/ f,�. I� �� V f•�}I= �OS/ ' �pt�FN ' w N I � .� : Ot � � � �i f.�.irl0(,� •fst/ ' o • .i�� I � i .,_ . ..... 66 .M.. �l4►� _ � Febriaru 20, 1985 T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Mark W. Grimes, Director of Planning and Development SUBJECT: Request for Waiver of the Platting Ordinance - 1101 and 1107 Orkla Drive Walter Kost, owner of the house and lot at 1101 Orkla Drive and his neighbor to the north, Sylvia Engwall, 1107 Orkla Drive, have requested a waiver from the Platting Ordinance in order to change the lot line between their two homes. . In reality, Mr. Kost and Mrs. Engwall want to go back to the original lot line between Lots 9 and 10, Block 3, "Golden Oaks". (The Kost lot is Lot 9 and the Engwall lot is Lot 10.) The original lot line was main- tained until the early 1950's. At that time, Mr. Kost wanted to build an addition to his garage on the north side of the house that would have come 12 feet from the side lot line. The Zoning Code at that time required a 15-foot sideyard setback. Mr. Kost consulted with the City Manager in � order to determine how he could build closer to the line. The suggestion given was to purchase property from the then vacant parcel to the north (1107 Orkla Drive) owned by the Engwalls. A land trade was made between the Kosts and the Engwalls that gave the Kost lot three feet of additional width to a point about 85 feet back from Orkla Drive. In return, the Engwall lot was made three feet wider in the rear portion of their lot. Since the land trade was made, the Zoning Ordinance has been changed to . reflect a different sideyard setback. The current ordinance requires a 12-foot setback (157 of the width of the lot) in the Residential District. �, Mr. Kost and Mrs. Engwall would like to go back to the original description of their property to eliminate the awkward land descriptions and to acknow- ledge what they consider the "real" property line. In addition, the three-foot strips are no longer necessary to meet setback requirements. Recommendation I recommend approval of the request for waiver of the Platting Ordinance in order that the two three-foot strips of property may be transferred. The change is logical and will be beneficial to both landowners. � Attachments: 1. Site Location Map 2. Surveys • Revised � Jan. , 1964 � �� a�5 .. . ...1285 ib ..s___ � �:. r—.. . .d'° ; . ti�•,; e��s e��s e�o� B��s � �:`•�. 29139 jo , .. . .. b0 30��o a 13ry 65 0 ,� Hi� � .+,' ' `. 30� �.42 80 24 � •.♦ ,/o .� � � � � � � � � � •�j8.G2 G2 ��ti° � � ;� 2 �i 3 : 4 = 5 =� 6 :; � o. . I y� o �, 3 — —; ' I �$�23 �°o Z• o , � "� ,� �7 .ozl o �� •• •• I o I'� .5 13'.59 e . ,ti�, 4«oZ � as. . ,�� 1 22 3 '� ' t I d e n �� ;�.« �3z.:� � , Q , fio , „ �,� I N 2i � a• : .� � ` �,�16 �'' ��i � P '0 R A- ' ,r i�5 c' ►j •, �+ '^ / � i 6 �� s S - - ' . :� o , ` / - -�' `��20 r. 5� . 0 93 �J �' ,�, �♦ 13 �12• � �� N � - 3G.31 f34"� ` 0 0 �, o J°i `�T B �� ''� �w. r�'e � .S� ~ �^ �19 0 �46• ' o � n� ' y ia �� • � r ��, �� I 5� ' • ° ��3G 3�. ��_ , � )S' �� s�le� �t `' r; °` '6 � „o�J �„-*'.� � 3.4 ^,��o T �� a-- � _ --�� 5 � � �' '-• t �it �� • I6 15 .o I.. o • s � . �p 13 ina�L7.)1 t o��n t , �. • ,�- ,r 16 �V �.°S 62�o� i3i u1� �� \ ry ''°�C '�°j\p /�9 •�^ 8 • : � �N �,� � .., u,� � 1.`' 1' �a �d � �` • I Ilo.Gb 15 � � � � �.'�/'g�'�i�: 4v; 17 �1.1? 9 `� I1f � • �� • �S(,; 14 ,;; 13 � � " o� .. ��16 �''� �9s ,� I Z ' c: ..� ,,, '1� \ 5P1�P��•' ��", \ '�. � 're. �j� • i. Af �� 10 � � . �� '� � 2Zo.� �'- � .;; �1 j.3.. o ' � 65 ��.,, �� •dS d � � - `°o ��. �i4 1.74 ,n �. C � � �°3a , f \'' �o0 8,��1�0 � sO �f�t•j o'� �� •12 � 11 ~ 'o,�.�CY `�•SOV Ye�'�R. �",••. �te.o � )5 � �� y�,� o�O 'O'� � ��- .� �/,�� s ��' � o. o .a. O► � v�,p z, 6. ,�e� "''�E, - -- _ � s W . �' � / O / /5 � � o , 3�f jI n,..?l• '�ff •s � �G?d� G 41.11 1 � o � ^� <t r�,, �s ,^` 00 , � � /OOT 3 v / 4,)"'J V4 / � � 3 � � ' ' ,�62G� '^:� , . �oo • 2 . w�` ^ M^� `�� •! : /!p � � � — 3; e Northern States Power z. �n, o � ��: i0'Cu.� j � ,.... �. �E�'�� e•�:t�'�°'ltRi � ...,-. � ��n.) � � � ':'..� � M '�. � .. BPOO ! � `��' ..... � � u (4•C D. to V�l. I � � ~ ,,: . 3,6�, � , .r; �6 - • e �.c... w.s " � ��';> �' � • t �";� ,,, ,�� • � 33;�L� N . �' � R" „";�N ,�,° ,� �'.i �°`„��,�v- >T N • �<osT' Ld�' •� � I - 3� . 3 . o u -4- � N � � �ons placed on original line between Lots 9 and � � as shown per request of client. \� t- ,='� ° � _ .t.o O .'°"`' � ' � °� '� � �t O��S1�"pr �IM'� ti !v ��`�=Q`�, . � -7� ��`` �O I� �� C,��11� \ 1 ` • � / / \\ � �'� �,° \ � "�.��:r%i �J�/ " �� . �j �S�1w5 � . � �� Q �� . ��ht �� " � j�� d°�� \ � L� � � � . o �;� ►, p - � (�� , 7� i l �° \ / �. ��, � . o �h � ZZ.h � . � �� k '_s , � Lor , � �o� . 2 � DESCRIPTION: � That part of Lots 9 and 10, Block 3 ,"Golden Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota" described as follows: Beginnicig at a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 3.00 feet from the most easterly corner thereof; thence southwesterly parallel with the southeasterly line of said Lot 10 a di�tanr_P nf �5_nn fAt�t� thanep seuth— LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC� INVOICE N0 13390 F.B.N0. 2L.7—�t, LAND 3LTRVEYOS4 SCALE I" 30' � 0—DENOTES IRON REG[STERED UNDER LAWS OF 6TATE OF MINNESOTA MO S��I� 7801-7Srd Avenue North 6848093 �� Minneapolie,Mimeaota 66428 ��'t� $uroe�01'� �t�['�f�t WALTER KOST 3 0 v -k- �h N u Note: Irons placed on original line between Lots 9 and � 10 as shown per request of client. \T � � ' -fu �� O r w� � `� � KosT � � � � � 5° '� v �S' � 2`°`' �° � ° � - /Cos T �� d Z�. � LoT �? �� s o s., � � �� ,. 9 ' � �^L1 \ I � i �p��' � \ � � ' � � 22.� iA Oe�k s ; 0��1 rr, � �\ -' 6� � - 2� ,, -� W/tI� � �, 0 , , , DESCRIPTION: � That part oS Lots 9 and 10, Block 3,"Golden Oaks, Hennepin � County� Nltnnesota" described as follows: Beginning at a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 3.00 Seet from the most easterly corner thereof; thence southwesterly parallel with the southeasterly line of said Lot 10 a distance oS �5.Q0 febt; thence south— easterly parallel with the northeasterly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 3.00 feet; thence aoutheasterly parallel with the southwesterly line of said Lot 9 a distance of 3.00 feet; ' thence southwesterly parallel with the northwesterly line of s said Lot 9 Lo the southwesterly line thereot; thence southeast— . ly to the southwesterly corner of said Lot 9: thence north— easterly to the most easterly corner thereof; thence north— westerly to the point of beginning. The only easements shown ere from plats of record or Informetion provitled by client. 1Ne hereby certify that this is e true and cortect representation of a survey o1 the � boundaries of the ebove deacribed land end the location oi ell buildings entl vis- I ' ible encroachments,if any,from or on said land. Signed (�� Surveyed by us this—l4th day of May te_84 mond A.Pratch,Minn.Reg.No.8743 �