Loading...
06-11-84 PC Agenda • GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION {Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road) June 11 , 1984 7:00 P.M. AGENDA I . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 29, 1984 II. SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIG HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: Clarence Volp LOCATION: 765-775 and 875 Colorado Avenue South REQUEST: Preliminary P1at Approval of "Merchant's Industrial Park 2nd Addition° III. SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Renaissance of Golden Valley, Inc. � LOCATION: 2445 Winnetka Avenue North REQUEST: Approval of an Outpatient Adolescent Chemical` Dependency Treatment Center in a Business and Professional Offices Zoning District IV. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PUD AMENDMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLAT APPLICANT: Gary Properties, Inc. LOCATION: 1100 through 1200 Boone Avenue North REQUEST: Preliminary Design Plan Approval of Amendment to PUD #24, Midtown V. REPORTS ON CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - MAY 15 AND JUNE 5, 19$4 VI. CONTINUATION OF REPORTS ON APA CONFERENCE SESSIONS � �' MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY P�ANNING COMMISSION May 29, 1984 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Valley Room of the Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Vice Chair Tubman called the meeting to order at 7:OU p.m. Those present were Commissioners Leppik, Prazak, Russell , Sinyer and Tubman. Commissioners Forster and McAleese were absent. Also present was Alda Peikert, Assistant Planner. I . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 14, 1984 It was moved by Commissioner Leppik, seconded by Commissioner Sinyer and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the May 14, 1984 Planning Commission meeting as recorded. II . SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PUD AMENDMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLAN APPLICANT: Gary Properties, Inc. • LOCATION: 1100 through 1200 Boone Avenue North REQUEST: Preliminary Design Plan Approval of Amendment to PUD #24, Midtown Vice Chair Tubman introduced this agenda item and noted the staff recommen- ` dation of a June 11, 1984 informal public hearing date. It was moved by Commissioner Leppik, seconded by Commissioner Prazak and carried unanimously to set an informal public heariny date of June 11 , 1984 for consideration of the Preliminary Design Plan for an amendment to PUD #24, Midtown. III . INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Teacher Federations Credit Union LOCATION: 6500 O1son Memorial Highway REQUEST: Approval of a Drive Up Banking f acility in a Business and Professional Offices Zoning District Vice Chair Tubman introduced this ayenda item and called on Assistant Planner Alda Peikert to provide a staff report. � Planniny Comnission Minutes May 29, 1984 � Paye 2 Commissioner Russell questioned impact of the proposal on existing traffic conyestion on Country C1ub Drive near the intersection with Douglas Drive and Highway 55. Ms. Peikert stated that City staff recognizes that traffic congestion exists at the three way intersection of Country Club Drive with Douylas Drive and Highway 55, but that the Teacher Federations proposal would not have a negative impact on the traffic situation. The proposed plan in- cludes three curb cuts, which is the same number as currently exist at the site. The drive through facility directs traffic in one direction limiting one curb cut to an entrance and another to an exit, which may have a sliyht beneficial effect on the traffic situation. Commissioner Leppik asked why staff did not suggest removal of the row of ten parking spaces encroaching into the required landscaped setback on the south side of the property in view of the fact that parking provided is substan- tially more than required by Ordinance. Ms. Peikert answered that parking space required by Ordinance is a minimum and may not meet actual demand of a specific user. Staff encourayes provision of additional parkiny space if a proponent anticipates need for more space than required by Ordinance. Vice Chair Tubman expressed concern over potential conyestion in the drive through lanes caused by cars stacking up at the exit drive waiting to turn both left and right onto Country Club Drive. • Vice Chair Tubman recognized Mr. Paul Horgen, President of the Teacher Federations Credit Union, who was present to represent the proponent. Mr. Horgen offered background on the Teacher Federations Credit Union and the current proposal and then answered questions from Commissioners. Mr. Horgen stated that the Teacher Federations Credit Union is unique in that it does not serve the general community. A portion of the Teacher Federations Credit Union clientele is within the immediate eight county metropolitan area, but a substantial portion of the clientele is outside the metropolitan area. The Teacher Federations Credit Union has one other office located in St. Paul , and it would be the intent of the Credit Union to open an additional satellite office at another location rather than to expand operations on the 6500 Olson Memorial Highway site. Mr. Norgen described the Teacher Federations Credit Union facility at 6500 Olson Memorial Hiyhway as resembliny a home office with half of the business at that location home office type business and half of the business involving client transactions. Mr. Horyen stated that the Teacher Federations Credit Union has 5,000 members within a four mile radius of the Golden Valley office and therefore wishes to provide personal service to these people. According to Mr. Horyen, the current proposal for upgrading of the site is motivated by parkiny problems. The design for the current proposal was pre- pared from the outside in beginning with the best parking arranyement outside and adapting the inside spaces to accommodate the outside parking arrangement. � Planning Commission Minutes May 29, 1984 � Page 3 Mr. Horgen addressed earlier Planning Commissioner questions beginning with the question of parkiny within the landscaped yard on the south side of the property. Mr. Horgen stated that Ordinance parking requirements are minimal and that they are slim for the needs of the Teacher f ederations Credit Union. The Teacher Federations Credit Union desires a lony term solution to parkiny problems and therefore provides parking above Ordinance requirements. Mr. Horgen added that the location of parking on the south side results also from a design consideration in that the parkiny lot extends the line of the building which is located at the same setback point. Mr. Horyen stated that the three drive throuyh lanes proposed include two lanes manned by human tellers located in an elevated extension off the northeast corner of the buildiny ahead of the drive up lanes. The outside lane is an automated tel1er (ATM) lane which will elongate service hours with 24 hour availability and relieve peak hour traffic. The ATM lane will receive less use than the human teller lanes duriny open hours. It is estimated that one car per minute will exit the drive through facility during the busiest peak periods, and site planners hired by the Teacher Federations Credit Union do not anticipate any congestion problems associated with exiting the drive throuyh lanes. Mr. Horgen states that there are at present no problems observed with exiting the site and that current problems are with gettiny onto the site and findiny parking. Mr. Horyen emphasized need for the ATM lane in order to relieve parking congestion by elongating hours. � Commissioner Leppik asked whether the proponent considered installation of an automatic teller without a separate drive up lane. Mr. Horgen stated that it would be possible to use ATM through the wall on another part of the buildiny, but that the Teacher Federations Credit Union prefers use of the drive through to accomplish what they wish to achieve with the ATM. The Teacher Federations Credit Union anticipates a trend toward greater automation in the future. Younyer clients are more likely to choose use of the ATM. Use of the night deposit facility within an entrance has increased, and it is felt that use of the ATM would increase to a greater extent if combined with the drive throuyh feature. The designers chose use of the outside lane for the ATM drive throuyh in order to achieve maximum visibility. The Teacher Federations Credit Union does not anticipate phased installation of the drive throuyh lanes as indicated in the design consultant letter. Although the design con- sultants recommended initial installation of the two human teller lanes, the Teacher Federations Credit Union plans a more aggressive proyram with initial installation of all three lanes including the ATM lane provided the budyet allows construction of all three. Vice Chair Tubman asked for clarification of the charter limitation on the Teacher Federations Credit Union. Mr. Horyen stated that membership is limited to the State of Minnesota. Mr. Horgen added that the Teacner Federations Credit Union is dedicated to providing service to all members without the necessity for visiting the facility. . Commissioner Russell stated that she feels the proposal represents an improve- ment to the site. Planning Commission Minutes May 29, 1984 � Paye 4 Commissioner Prazak asked for clarification of his understanding that the pro- posal will actually increase the landscaped setback from Country Club Drive over what exists on the site at this time. Ms. Peikert confirmed that the landscaped setback would be increased. Vice Chair Tubman opened the informal public hearing for public input. There was no one present who wished to speak on this agenda item, and Vice Chair Tubman closed the informal public hearing. Mr. Horgen stated that he reviewed the conditions of approval recommended in the staff report and requested a change in the fourth recommended condition prohibiting future expansion of the buildiny and parkiny lot beyond that shown in the site plan submitted with the Conditional Use Permit application. Mr. Horyen stated that the proponent desires to preserve the opportunity to round off the proposed building addition with an additional 960 square feet of space in the northwest corner. Mr. Noryen stated that this option would be exer- cised only in the event the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) does not yrant the variance required for three drive through lanes. Vice Chair Tubman questioned whether a condition prohibitiny future expansion would be enforceable in view of the fact that a proponent has the riyht to request amendment of a Conditional Use Permit. Vice Chair Tubman suyyested that the Planniny Commission opinion that the current expansion program is the • maximum desirable development of the site be included in the minutes but not be included as a condition of the Permit. Ms. Peikert cautioned that inclu- sion in the Conditional Use Permit is the best way to assure preservation of the action for future reference. Commissioner Singer stated that he would recommend approval of the proposed three drive throuyh lanes due to the fact that the site location is across from Pako and from the Golden Valley Country Club Go1f Course and due to the fact that no residents attended the hearing to object to the proposal . Commissioner Singer suygested that provision for a larger building addition would not be necessary if the Planning Commis$ion recommends favorable con- sideration of the three lane drive throuyh proposal . Commissioner Prazak also expressed support for the three lane drive throuyh facility, especially in view of the fact that green space under the proposal will exceed what currently exists along the Country Club street frontaye. Commissioner Leppik stated that she would like to see a commitment to landscaping and screening both on Country Club Drive and along the Hiyhway 55 frontaye. Commissioner Prazak asked whether signage, particularly directional signs for use and separation of the drive through facility, would be addressed. Ms. Peikert replied that signaye would be examined by the City Building Inspector and by the Building Board of Review. Commissioner Prazak asked that note be • made in the minutes to alert the Building Inspector and Buildiny Board of ReView to direct particular attention to signaye at this site. P1 anni ng Corr�ni ssi on Mi nutes May 29, 1984 � Page 5 Commissioner Russell questioned the availability of snow removal storaye space under the proposed site plan. It was agreed that removal of snow from the site, if necessary, would be the responsibility of the proponent. It was moved by Commissioner Sinyer and seconded by Commissioner Prazak to recorr�nend City Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit reyuested by the Teacher Federations Credit Union for addition of a drive up banking facility to the existing building located at 6500 Olson Memorial Highway in a Business and Professional Offices Zoning District subject to the following conditions and highlighting the second condition requiring intensified landscapiny: � 1 . Grantiny by the Board of Zoniny Appeals (BZA) of waiver necessary for construction of the drive up facility, construction of the buildiny addition and expansion of the parking lot. 2. Intensified landscaping treatment of the front yards along Country Club Drive and along Olson Memorial Highway in accordance with direction and requirements provided by the Building Board of Review. 3. Combination into one parcel for tax purposes and for resale purposes of the two original parcels comprisiny the Teacher Federations Credit Union • site. 4. No future construction of additional buildiny or parking beyond that indicated on the site plan dated April 23, 1984 and revised May 2, 1984, submitted in support of the Conditional Use Permit application. 5. No stackiny of cars for the drive up facility onto Country Club Drive. 6. No customer parking off site on Count�y Club Drive. - 7 . Failure to comply with one or more of the above conditions shall be grounds for revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Peikert asked for clarification of Planning Commission intent reyarding the fourth condition prohibitiny future expansion. It was the general consen- sus of the Planning Commission that the condition should remain as a caution to future decision makers and that provision for a laryer addition at this time would not be appropriate in view of Planniny Commission endorsement of the proposed three drive through lanes. A vote was taken, and the motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Russell stated for the record that she is opposed to inclusion of the fourth condition prohibiting future expansion but that she chose not to vote against the motion based on inclusion of that one condition. � Planning Commission Minutes May 29, 1984 • Page 6 IV. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING - MAY 15, 1984 Vice Chair Tubman directed that the report on the May 15, 1984 City Council meeting be deferred to the next Planning Commission meeting agenda due to the absence of Commissioner McAleese who attended the meetiny. V. REPORTS ON APA CONFERENCE SESSIONS Vice Chair Tubman informed Commissioners that Commissioner Forster requested deferral of American Planning Association (APA) Conference reports until the next meeting when he would be present. It was decided to proceed with some of the reports and to hold those of more general interest until the next Planning Commission meetiny. Commissioners Leppik and Russell reported on a session entitled "Redesiyniny the American Dream", which they described as a futuristic session dealiny with housiny and neighborhood redesign to accommodate chanyes in household com- position. Commissioner Leppik reported on a session entitled "The Electronic Cottage° dealiny with the rapid yrowth in home businesses based on computer use and with zoning techniques for handling the new home businesses. The recommended approach to regulation of home businesses is to concentrate on the impacts • which cause problems, such as parkiny, traffic, commercial deliveries, and employees, and not to regulate aspects of the home business which do not create problems. Planning Commissioners discussed the City of Golden Valley Zoniny O�dinance which prohibits nome businesses and recalled a request received in 1981 for a Zoning Ordinance amendment to allow home businesses. Planniny Commissioners agreed that both based on awareness of numerous home businesses in existence in Golden Valley and based on expectation that home businesses will increase, the Planning Commission should initiate study of the home business question. The Planniny Corrnnission reyuested collection of backyround materials on the subject of home business regulation as a starting point for study of the issue. Commissioner Leppik reported on a Conference session entitled "Women and Housiny" which provided statistical data on female heads of households, income levels and housing needs. The session discussed zoniny provisions which impact on the ability of women heads of households to obtain adequate housing. Commissioner Russell reported on a similar session on the status of women heads of households and reported that 40 percent of households in this cate- gory are located in the suburbs. Commissioner Russell observed that the sub- ject of female heads of households and their housing needs correlates with the home businesses topic due to the increased need for home businesses in house- holds of this type. � Planning Commission Minutes May 29, 1984 . Page 7 Commissioner Russell reported on a session entitled ''Meeting Elderly Housiny Needs in Metropolitan Areas", which pointed out that a planner's objective assessment of elderly housing may differ substantially from the elderly person's own subjective assessment of his or her housing. Elderly persons may favor familiar housiny in neighborhoods where they have friends and may not be in a mood to accept the housing marketed to the elde�ly. The point made in the session is that early marketing of elderly housing options is necessary. Several Commissioners reported attendiny a Planniny Commissioners Workshop entitled "Reasoning Together" and receiving excerpts from a recently published book written by the leader of the session. Commissioner Prazak suygested purchase of copies of the book for Planning Commissioners and use of available meeting time to review and discuss selected sections of the book as background traininy for the Planning Commissioner role. It was ayreed that remaininy reports on APA Conference sessions would be pre- sented at the next Planning Commission meeting. The meetiny was adjourned at 8:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � Lloyd Tubman, Vice Chair Gary Prazak, Secretary � • T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JUNE 6, 1984 FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "MERCHANT'S INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION° The proponent, Mr. Clarence R. Volp, owner of an office warehouse building located at 775 Colorado Avenue South in an Industrial Zoning District, in 1972 purchased a 20 foot strip of land from the adjoining property at 875 Colorado Avenue South. The adjoining property, site of the Phillippi Equipment Company, was owned by Charles W. Merchant at the time of the purchase and remains in the ownership of his estate. A title examination conducted in connection with intended sale of Mr. Volp's property in late 1983 revealed that Hennepin County never transferred the 20 foot strip of land to Mr. Volp`s ownership for tax pur- poses due to the fact that Mr. Volp never obtained City approval of the property � division. Mr. Volp now requests City approval of the property division in order to clear title and conclude the sale of his property. The properties involved, those at 775 and 875 Colorado Avenue South, have not previously been platted except for the northerly part of Mr. Volp's property, which is Lot l0, Block 1 , Merchant's Industrial Park. The properties are described by means of complicated metes and � bounds land descriptions. The City therefore, requires platting of both proper- ties in order to transfer the subject 20 foot strip of land to the Volp property. Mr. Volp has obtained concurrence of the present owner of the adjacent property, Mrs. Mary Merchant, to platting of the two properties with incorporation of the 20 foot strip of land into the Yolp property. Staff suggests that the Planning Commission set an informal public hearing date of June 24, 1984 for con- sideration of the Preliminary Plat of "Merchant's Industrial Park 2nd Addition". Attachment: Site Location Map � � I a: '� .. ,'�� � .� o.::.r; '' � �V�'� ' 2 �2� �. 2 0 O � 2� A � • � �� y � �. � "� � �� "� ti =° 3 � oo a° �3 $ 300 � � �� 0 3 /C � sc 3 _ w E �r� �� � < �' Ntl J !4G f !4�lB . »c.aJ W� �4�e u� •. t� ; a w z "'�'�EAST • �' a h O � 4 � `0�; °j u`_ � - {� � a N I7 '� � � � b� �f O � '. ,��, �� �' .0 .�IKAf .ytia--- yt� L `r o O .y • s i,�e� . S �� '!` �0 14 a M � � � °s , / i.1k 1 • � �c,,��S/�fit! 7 ' � • ~��r � ouT�oTr� " � '�a.33 � o;w a s;AS^'��� ,� � r �,�;5, _�' • � D� .�'". �;)f =9 � J „� 6051 �'.". +1� � C/T � ` -+ � rOF . � '� ' � C�fr 6µ•�✓A�x� GOLlJE.v v c[ �,� 7oS.Gi � � '� ,... �j er3t'W ;�1.20 q Ey v' .' r..'"' ,__''_'- pr � -------- q '�AJ�fG._ N8'�46 44'f 5;998 AVC -- _� --- AUR - --— - � � ' 34'3� 22o i�E �.E �:Z9& �� ---- ---- � � 'N � � � + 4 � 3 � � 1 2 20 v� :a • . _�_ J ' O. � �I . � ^ � • � � V \' W u� 5 w �/, ' � a ��o _,�.__ -a�'}�s ,� A � � °° � 4 u� 232C� N8:'6644 f � 1 ,�,1`,y, � 6 ��-- _� , , _ � 8 Gs65) � � . r,�� c 1, � ,R �e��o f:y� � ti� � � Bury� Co.r/son ! ..,,�1r�l4�Ji�L04.i $....�4.IC i�l� 0�"F' o � ... �,�.j..�, c $� ° NQ?4�44�( °n�44326�f�g,`N�� =N 6DOe � � ���a�o caoaac�� �:. E�.33 �� �. . f . . � g ` �� �° °°`� s : o. � � � ;, ����'- '�� �; ��y ,���,.g3 � � �iTt4i��� V d� ��+ g �.. �;��� � ' ��1 \ .�,��r.�.� ` �s��' ? � '' � � � o ,b> ` � � `," � ,�' � ` ��'�° 7f `� m � � i� �\%kr��` �`�� \��� j�R;`°9e�` �`-� D a ,� ` � \ �\ \ ',��� . o`�'v :s d� 9 � _ � � a n�i a � �t \,\�\, �` ., ,,\�-�x�"�..�'� �5�'na�o.. _ � ,� 4 t �,�.__L_.�.. �. m i \ �'0'�5+ ', \ t ,.V /p2 t5 `:05 �ps �p , ---- � : � \� � � ; � , .�,��' �s�o) � rr ��� � y � `� � e . � � C° � � �\` O. V � � � ---3�--�- � a .� ����'�� �`,� �i���'` `�`i c�x,� � o �� � v,: �� Bo�� ;� a :�, \ ,\ `� �, �� ,,���_... � � � � � � � ti \ n� o o `� , , , `t � , �, � v O w �.. �i \ ` � \ �� \� �\ , a (536? b a � , , `� , 1 � ,t�``� � I /� o • °o� � � 'ti ���_� ` �\'\`�I � � / ; ,, �` ' , . 30L : SO:, 4 �. ,100 � , ^��01,` 99 95� /12 4S /OS /05 *0 7 ' 1 � :. ` ..,�. + ti e t 3�e9 � .- : �_•.j � �. � �j ` w-- � j �- � t � -� i� �, � ��"..A 1 -1 ( ,,,� � �„ � !f0 � ' � w v j y � �l w $ � a t"�i�a,`�r ��'i, w t�i� :?j i2S0 j ��,,, � i � `" a b�Iw �' �� � � � �w � ' �' � �- r ! � + ^ h � r � �' i -� I w, �' 6!?I �it/O I�. � . W b v� j � '�� �I' • �� � v, ^ w � � + � '� � y ..._ .�tii+.° � � � � � '� • � � � ! � � ,j � �9�0 �.�. j � �•� ���,-. _ � S2 . �30 6/60 6/50-f0 6/00 6'p30 +S�r �� • � ��. � + 'jp r`�„i /00 It 0 79�6 59P0`.,,���'` �:� CITY pF GOI�DEN A�,�EY ��,i ��.a�'_ 306.f -•.� � . ' � . �,� --,- ------- _ 31 - •� . .. CITr Of aT. l U 1 g .°P�R 947' f:y; , 1! • y. � ; � ; , � � � ' f o • �' • ..._ ' � .�� ' ��: , 2 ��11 '. 7 �, s � j, , !'�'9 � ��fto+c) �� � � � E� � ` ' t ; � . ti ,W 9 s O i 1 1 1 g 3 I e2 ! \ � � � :7'�3 � , ,s...r''� ! � ; i, ; � � pr t) 'I , '_ --�- - -� - �--' "'� � � �- -� ' ' , �Jl�o) Q. . + -,� ° Y �r_'r--t u :: l� �'SO t�4/y � �. , "�� �� - ; -il.f l// 'i •". �'i . a �* � . .+ ' .� - 'J�r __ • 'j` w:jf � 4 �� �_; " �j M � ` � t-- - - ' �� ' ' -�''^-��'1 ; � � . '�•'• : �� ° '► 20 : :� , j �E �i�+K�i ' � �,, `�"?-�--3sa0�' •:�--� s �so�"�s"�-►� : _ � , : � . . � �+ T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JUNE 6, 1984 • FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OUTPATIENT ADOLESCENT CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY TREATMENT CENTER IN A BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICES ZONING DISTRICT - 2445 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH The proponent, Renaissance of Golden Valley, Inc. , requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow location of an outpatient adolescent chemical dependency treat- � ment center in an existing building located at 2445 Winnetka Avenue North in a Business and Professional Offices Zoning District. Renaissance of Golden Valley is currently located in the lower level of a building located at 1710 Douglas Drive North, also in a Business and Professional Offices Zoning District. The Golden Valley City Council , at the recommendation of the Planning Commission, on August 17, 1982 approved a Conditional Use Permit for the 1710 Douglas location. The Conditional Use Permit was issued under a Zoning Code provision for conditional uses which the City Council determined to be compatible with other uses in the Business and Professional Offices Zoning District. Staff suggests that the Planning Commission set an informal public hearing date � of June 25, 1984 for consideration of the Conditional Use Permit requested by Renaissance of Golden Valley for location of an outpatient chemcial dependency treatment center at 2445 Winnetka Avenue North in a Business and Professional Offices Zoning District. Attachment: Site Location Map � ... =5,:.atRcs -.._ - - _ . �� _ Eas� _ . - - - ---- --- � - . . -- -- - -- - ,s - ----�, c�.;t �26.17._ _ I.o a.� 9 S/39 B/O% � '' BG75 t 1i4.44 !2{.it �+ = III.}C �oe loo �oa , 4� 'r r 'i' -- �= . • �: � .� ` � O i ��`,Q� . `" =:. is� � "� �� � N z � ; N a N , � � +1 �J Y h �. . -� � ' . {Z�.�G � .� r• h � ' � . ., , '�_ � • � }3i.2��R o � �� � _10o L_ loo. j i1o.68 o y4Q1 r...+� ip�4 p �� o '� p - - � r,PIG).2� E�S�� Ii1.?� � 11�.03 r+ � N;-- � , p- . . . , z� � e � �. ^i 3 �H � M�r�2. � ° `°° :"g ••°.� ��� ; e�4o� ,°•. �5 � : - __��2 � ���o'� :'N� .tr � .M.tl'45 C "�1 alDC � .�!�'1e-�.i � o . g ' ,,` ,g�.ty o,4 ,. o IZo l2� ' � 3 � �r, � .. as�,. h "'� m r. �; A (�� �cr f c ce �� � o� '� N y`ly' y �rl, ��� I���B/ �0~ 1 .' ��35 k ��• C , L y . . ^ ` G :1 ! �• �.,�1.;� 112.�0 :5�0 ..._.� b.0 --r-�.�S.G?�It�t I t �� � N ���io .S. . ^ 3 �t•�^ ^� `6J 1�, i iQ"�I. • . •t �'. .1G o .,��`� �� � \ 't�'. =h ...v�� � �j�f'�-� �S.N''�� � o�°o � .e', ���'L. � � ", ° •' �+,y„r eF •� ' ' �c`N � . • qr a o� �,r �•-" e S. -° - � � � $ 'O:3 _�S� ';3 p�~I� /•�3 �� f� • .r'�N _i�G.? .._.__- II �e 45.8 ' 0 1 t1.'lT i � " � .Z �, .a �-�_ LLi ."' -.��'^� �° ;� ,.ia- _-___- _' e-� h • �RC�! ~�00 � r __-._ � p- t • ° 2 � o Rh +i '`CVO s ♦- � `•'4 ` � 10 '=`- vf- 1 I •° °Q s V ° e" ''�• °;, ' � �) � �':. °. • Ho - c.. "he ,. ;t�11 P•:�- � Y� •o� ��-� ?,���-.:�°o � o � • � _ '45.81 �ic� - � . �,�}'. ' o. .._`o . ���� � ♦EiSt _ II 115! s a � �i • � - „�h � ta•,�b + � --�----�-- 4 i ,5.81 05 05 a � �,5e '(1.1 t1.c t' . � h: v 3 Q�� - � �}Z P ,, f C, i\ O ^�\/O ..��.00R'e`? � � e •� �� � . ;i.� s P • � � ;;� .IB�....y�2:%2`� i� �' � . y" � �� . � il! �` � v,� �i 3 ' :- �.� �� , ;sC z3 L. ;. - ��, i� 8�,, „ . ,. �oz ! r •� � 0 4 Z � '.o � -.-+-..-�4�. �I� r��1.ii . .,Ic2o 5C� 1.g �� M �^ . �o__Z8_ __<o e _�� r •�� o� _R7o wll�'�r.i �. e . oV �-, blwg oe .'.� _ �t ,r ��- �1 � , ,' .3 � °5 - 7<� . '� �.�y r. '4 i- . � '". • -. 4J Y o i Z � e b =;eo4 e� �..68'7 � 53 9 : ; "6° -,�� _.. r - � ` '4 ti ' � gONELIEN� LANE` . �: � • " - , > _ • -. , � � c �C? �c2 .5�� '^ O• P � Q ---�-- �___,IB_.q_ ' E c- °. . � b �6 p° J � t..<9045 2BGi5 yLb5m �S /IC z� j .n o.". ti Z ol- _ �. ::It .n 3�l Zl i' �� 5.69 .n :1° � 'o o N � 2 N � ^ n�•c� ' s . •� _, Y �.� E � _ �,�.a M_�zr -- �•5 �, a `o o � �. • _ " �y�s �� � `n � t2t 1 � -, /E35t H= � 3 �y�°°+ a _ __ � �t ,,,,C ��b ' f �Ij.56 � �6 88 c� 3 0: ..3430 �, 3w4� o ,� 1- . ',,;n� o I. 1 7„~ �2:.i 4 T -'o"� .r. • N .n ,Z��`p,, � o ,, 2� o�r e� H`OD ° _ N9G4; BC?0 R000 � ' e _a;. 7 ,,,,�- r• � 0 7�° � 6 �i s a ��t y�,� � N � / M � ° + '.. S'_!` --? .s h °� � ..i IZS ,,,e.O � ^_' o.�. 2S �0�1? ,G� . � h et°� ___ -- .. ,�-a � .9 J' � .R•k� � -e8Y � � '� A���dh . . f� � 9; �� ✓• N -"�1• .� oir � lo� ?jo .`T91 I�WOC�.J�V 2 �o_ .jr S�� ,�p9.i4�,M::_�Z ' �I N . . �,v �_ e m .., .�.�. .� 5G� c _ ! ,1Qr . K J r � J '�.. s � �3_.� w^ ,P- .�., .'�. °�. - w..� � Cv r e . � . � �� �� � _1i61j _ 5 0: �. ; 5 c;5 •� e�. ; � } � � •�° S� � _ ` ` \•°. _ r� 1': !1 no 90491 � io• o T =c9:. i2, ,r t , Z + o �:2.235' ; • � ' I 3GiF � b � � o';'N�` ,� � �1� ! � �� • • • �� N: y •N� N �O � � ND � � .2 �: S .�0 32 _ . - �n 5 � E�„ �i �� _ RIcH �, 3 e� , �o 0 2 '. � , � '"ce-5 a r' Z , ��:i*_ ` � �.o i�cz „�- ,��!� o�� ° � �`' t3 - � �j O _ -�---T-----�T---� ,0 • ; • !� io.z: " ioo ioo ,00 0 4a W � � r-' _ � � ! � �; � `_ _ � �:: ' ;: ' �' ! � • �,p • s �4 0 o A p pl l0 N_ o - L 1 �• 8 , � io � ,2 �ECD a = 3 = � ac _ � at no.,+ So 6, :io.o , 8200 �o� � o� --, !,,.2- i � �t.70 ^T:2C ' r:j� � __ �' � .Y �B15C � OC ♦ . DO 0 H ;�` } ��'� . K _64•,.i b�;&: '4G / ,y� .1✓ 5 . y- t�^�3 ''3 .�.p� _ � 't�. - isro� n�'�`_-. _V-- 44$-1-- 5 4°��_ _ __^. � '' -. � .4� r.t. � �.t. �.,�„ e.r.l, :� :M. i: ..�955 .fP ,r o - }r r- � . . .-�--=-�-- � �: _ .� � _ . : . . I4 re, . rE ��o, I. ot roa 4 •� �. xqAya c.� r+ � •;1{�' 30;:0 T��S o o -.Y tI� •.� • 79�5 W /2. .`� ? r� '�2 1� � = �3�j.. ; i► i�a` ,� ;;Jry��� .. •i ry . � . � 4�^� 3 ` q: ,, � �y!t,� ;` r� ti� �C � - a� � �, - C,j� S p . � V . qfs �rt1Yt.� Y c �lL +� :t1'Sfil, �yS� .s ��«,�. 1 utlr J25 ws� I V e� . ` ,� eo 1 "S 1�.1��_ " ,,,� -- -�' �� ' ' � � - _ . y <.a4 � ~�� j;+G S 5: 4, ,g,. o e o•• 2 2 ^�!G► S� o�0' '-' ��o . e .7♦.. .. .. - . . '! '^ �,, �n c NJf . �o�� c °e E � •- .� � 1,;:. T.h io�s .. Jb]>. r v Z ��� b.�•4 � 'be..�: ..N. ��1 "�.^`- O - � ,h�o W(fi I;G � � . -15^. o � p �1��� ^ ...y► �:t... �Ir_li � ..Nhe QS'v �p _ ++� � � � �4 � - > �� , - p � _�II._ � �� �., p � ry 6��s O � \y ti �� •� 4 `� �;: �3 3 - •3 �:, � ,.�, �;A t�oT � _.����+ ,� •`� � � O �� . �Lr •a a • � � - �G Oi � � .e ` . � � M1�y Sti � Q s4 i w 2�7: 'Si5 : M �/�'.��j'F �.a � e e --- N � ��SH 3u � .�:� � MI}°;:5: N 50 w1C � ;i , - + • v ' G 0�0 � O ��� w� ^r� h.� � �� •.° i j..}:� J. � N ICZ i ` ��i���` n�•� � � ; • 7 �.�i5` •. Z ' / b e o �4 � [ �� � I K�121 : 5 7 • �� � y ! �Y=y , 41�5 �Z�� � I h � �"D f p ���7�1� b �l . " �+ _ . O� t t �1 Q• p _-. � i, �tj 1�� :h.�. + ��t Of K�.�b i��» l��:�ID� � �.D . . O �J N���Y� � . . � g ° 3 ,2. " s i3 >..;, � :5� �� 2z�o_. C 3:s ,zz� �.�t�.�[ + � h �i ., a-- ���.�"`` e °" �z °..^�: •6 �^' aH'�o'S2-w /� i� ;. . Q f o 5 • ` � 7 � " �•• !Y •� j V i1��.s �/°25 2G"M 2 V ,M17��0 ON2� { � °,�,2 .. 2 2�t �Q n�7� 4 dG f , �_.� , a� �� � � .: _ _ � . �� �3C �ao w��"M/71020�W _ T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JUNE 5, 1984 � FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLAN FOR AMENDMENT TO PUD #24, MIDTOWN Gary Properties, Inc. proposes an amendment to PUD #24, Midtown, an unfinished residential PUD, in order to proceed with completion of the project. The origi- nal PUD, approved in June 1980, proposed construction of ten residential units arranged in five duplexes on a parcel 2.37 acres in area. The site location is southeast of the intersection of Boone Avenue North and Plymouth Avenue with unit addresses ranging from 1100 through 1200 Boone Avenue North. The develper, Zappa Development Company, constructed the first duplex, 1100-1110 Boone Avenue North, in 1980 and installed the private access drive and utility lines for the remainder of the PUD at that time. Zappa Development Company has not proceeded further with completion of the PUD and proposes sale of the unfinished portion of the PUD to another developer. Gary Properties, Inc. has submitted a PUD Preliminary Design Plan for an amend- ment to PUD #24, Midtown, which involves relatively minor adjustments of building size and lot lines. The amended PUD retains basic elements of the ori- ginally approved PUD, which proposed zero lot line division of each duplex for separate ownership of individual units and lots. A low area on the northeast portion of the property is reserved as common open space, and the PUD calls for � joint ownership and maintenance of the private access drive and common off street parking areas. The primary change from the original PUD is use of new building plans for the remaining duplexes which result in different and larger building footprints on the lots. The new building footprints necessitate minor adjustment of lot lines leading to replatting of the property. Variances from Zoning Ordinance requirements of the Residential (Single Family) Zoning District, which are incorporated into the PUD and may be approved as part of the PUD approval process, include variances of minimum lot size, lot width, and side yard setback requirements. All lot sizes are under the 10,000 square foot minimum lot size requirement for a lot in the Residential Zoning District, ranging from 4200 to 7570 square feet in area. All lot widths also are less than the 80 foot minimum width required in the Residential Zoning District sec- tion of the City Zoning Code, ranging from 41 to 71 feet in width. Examiniation of combined lots for each double in view of the Two Family (R-2) Residential Zoning District requirements, which are 12,400 square feet in area and 100 feet in width for a duplex lot, reveals that only the combined lots for the southerly building provide adequate area and width. Combined lots for the northerly building meet width but not area requirements. Side yard setbacks are reduced to zero for zero lot line division of the units and to only five feet on oppo- site sides for a total of ten feet between buildings. All variances are similar to those for the originally approved PUD except for the reduction to five foot � Golden Valley Planning Commission -2- June 5, 1984 � side yard setbacks resulting from the larger buildings. In view of the constraints imposed by working within an already approved PUD design, staff feels that the proposed variances are warranted. It is in the best interests of the City to have the project completed and to have the remaining buildings upgraded. Staff suggests that the proponent consider repositioning of the riortherly four duplexes in order to achieve continuity of setback from the private access drive. The northerly duplex is located in such a manner as to meet the 35 foot minimum setback requirement from both Plymouth Avenue and Boone Avenue North right-of-way lines. This allows a setback from the pri�ate access drive of only 21 feet, compared with a 35 foot front setback for all other units. Reduced setback from a private drive does not constitute a variance, but the placement is undesirable from an aesthetic standpoint. The northerly building gives the appearance of placement in front of the adjacent building, and this effect is accentuated by the close proximity of the buildings and the angle of the adja- cent building. The proponent explains in the application cover memorandum that it is not possible to adjust all buildings to the south due to the location of utilities already in place. The City Engineer also cautions against �ving the southerly building further to the south due to the fact that space for surface water � drainage is required along the south property line and due to the fact that the City desires access to a major storm sewer line along the railroad track on the south. The only alternative is variance of the setback requirement from Plymouth Avenue right-of-way. The property across Plymouth Avenue from the Midtown PUD site is . zoned Residential , but the area adjacent to Plymouth Avenue is extended lower level yard of a house located at a higher elevation. It is suggested that the Planning Commission consider exploring with the proponent adjustment of the Plymouth Avenue setback to allow placement of the northerly duplex in line with the other buildings in the PUD. A second staff concern is integration of the existing duplex into the finished Midtown PUD. It appears from the PUD application that the proponent intends to purchase only the remaining building sites and that the existing duplex will remain in separate ownership. Nowever, all owners of property within the PUD site area are required to participate as parties to the PUD. It is suggested that specific plans for integration of the existing duplex into the PUD be required with the PUD General Plan of Development. � Golden Valley Planning Commission -3- June 5, 1984 � Based on determination that the proposed PUD amendment would facilitate comple- tion of a problem unfinished residential PUD and would result in upgrading of the buildings over those in the originally approved PUD, staff suggests that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Preliminary Design Plan submitted by Gary Properties, Inc. for amendment of PUD #24, Midtown, sub- ject to the following conditions: 1 . Relocation of the northerly duplex to bring it into line with the other buildings in terms of setback from the private access drive. 2. Provision for integration of the existing duplex into the finished PUD. 3. Submittal with the PUD General Plan of Development of appropriate homeowner association and easement documents for review by the City Attorney. 4. Provision in the building plans for separate sewer and water services for each unit. 5. Provision in the building plans for separation walls in accordance with required Code and City Building Department standards. � Attachments: 1 . Site Location Map 2. Application Cover Memorandum 3. Originally approved PUD Plan 4. Proposed Revised PUD Preliminary Design Plan (Full sized plan sheet enclosed separately) � � zj � ti� �tie,�' N � � =� _ \o � � t�;=,;-� w l� P ^Q � . .y e . �w � � . . O ��s o�`2, o \ ' Q �., -..� '2f1 ,^ , c � '' ,, ' "" � f• ,o � �_' � � � d R I n so. �\ �`ri . • � . � ` �• . . � . . a . � ! . \ : �F , � . �. ` �.. �O � � h �" O � "'�h fy ' /f�,; �— .�n � � '� Z � T IF _\ l� �R •^P ��'�,� s � ,� • ( , a' �+,1' �` -� _ Q� � � ..._�D ?ry" av $ � � N�3 6�i� y ��. : � ; -r 6 '' g .�� �.�• »ej uN I � d' � "` � � � � ."•�^ I � ; � - lp ' o : I ;.^ .... 4�'294 ...L9't��... o I f:t4i �....x ES ..... �e(����, cQ�b�► ..... °� �f o�� I r N �4 ' r. o�. zo��i — o zsl\ ... 5 9 4 ;4 °4 ... 5 . h � � � ~ • (+�'e . . o ._ N�o M '^ . � w . M � . . . . � � . � h ~ Y � , � � � . . . . i6l/. 96d!�' ;,� ���,xu �, y �g1.7� --• 00/ � JI F8 ��.:LZ"t1 a. S � e� �N . � . �w�' !o fIi .. �pytE-b ��N "r � � v!►M In 0 �e lbn0� rvo�n�;c � y � � 'Y. �s S62i � , • 4 ` � h m � � m 00/ .ti o i!I�S:. y " � � • .. . . �ez� . ; ,e, ' �ti..f j . a � � � �`k�s rj�! ,� r� t0 � . � � . � ' N � ,�, � 0° ,� � . f� � r— � n p 0" g M � �n .n h �, �• Q '^ w+ �O - i'6l/ : � 7� � � ' �. .�o . . Q�F[ .:�+ v � . . 4 '• f0 a- � � r6�� ��i°'� � issi> �t t� - ' i ± � : � � � w -- - - - ro � "` g^ z6t�a ^�` � i 96Z/ ` '�. 7�� 06Z/ .� L. -= � �O v� � OG/ SB IfYS�..'�. �i)yt �O F i� w.� .� . � � � � . . ��r I�'IFl "' !/�/!- �m _ � '� • . 0 �� lan0� '�� : }<<a ��ZES � � �z� LN dCI,�.°v� '•- ot o'fti e o Ea" ���I • o � o � � � � �� �` O o < tic-9•5 �en ° � ° �e'' s J�� • N ` o! o tl4 ` ` � : f-- �t szi ozi � �•: �/� � e�� ; je��j ; � e a ° N "' Vf V♦ ,, Q. . ... Q i�J + _ � �� `, ^ si� � � �,o/ . � � v ^ ' � J . . • � ; K, N�� W ti'+��' ^ �c� ° « ,,, O ,.�c Ii� �. ,� N "' � • ' ° „� J � oa, _.._ szi � m p�(A {I o S � ZQ o r �� v, cv� ^pa ��+�'h�4l � � S45 � o'VS � s S Q ,� 8 M o � ,, '$ s . � °a. 'r� � — r a — � o a . � t * � C9 � ti � � ao ' 13�..M1ti�f, r �� �orz� oor�r Wt, : l I m �. • , � + , � � ' �S. ,,, , — o W ,�:,, 9 � � •x � " ,g '•',_` �' " oli ° �•3S � ' � � J.� � .r p N . ::'., '�� s . - � . m _ ' .,►.- , $ a � $ ° ,_.: ;� � �,,. � . _ — _ :..�... � i:`,�'f � • . s C� 0'90l fi s ..- ` 4 0 � N .� .f, � �`� � -' `� ~' � ._._ � o � o � �� `, '�� + m � � ..�.... �`� �1 J \� e o ,.. � �tA � � �s . F..� L V N �•.�,11 L ,�. '� ,v "( V c, V v .rv� > `� � � s • ^ �i�i ao \ 'lj �oI f6 1 �'1 0 2(� °4 °4 4._' �` 9ii - \ ; t�2l.,�3.. .tt � � --�s . n�'� . . ,� .... � '�� M ,LM ..� �' — � �/� �N 1I0/ t/6 ��t�4 i•�: � µ, � � � LS 9t'�5E �� �l ^ � : � � � N O"J � . > � ,N v M Z' V o . • I � �- � ` • T � o ry r V �y, r � Qit 0�1 �`� �► X , .�i r; � «� O i t y/��N b I T WI O � � e �i� L'It2 . I �N � • e � v. � � '� � .,.,N g I � � � LZ'£8E � 0!2 �0 � � td'E�! 4�foN ( c � f � , � � � ir � May 21 1984 � MEMORANDUM T0: Mike Miller City of Golden Valley RE: Midtown PUD Amendment Boone Avenue & Plymouth Road Midtown is an existing PUD approved for 5 two-unit structures .(10 units total). To date, utility services and the private driveWay are in but only one structure (2 units) has been built. The proposal is to amend the exist- ing PUD by a re-subdivision of Block 1, Lots 1-8 into 8 new lots. The changes will be mi�or lot-line adjustments to accommodate an upgraded building both in appearance and size (4 bedrooms and double garage}. Total units (10) and land use (2-family dwellings) will remain the same. Justification for the requested amendment and for the variances �o typical R-1 standards is that the proposed changes are adjustments within the exist- � ing PUD for which variances have already been approved. Standards will remain similar to those previously approved. Setbacks to public road right- of-ways will remain at 35 feet. Front setbacks to the private drive will be 35 feet, except for one structure which will be 21± feet due to the rear setback to a public street. This 21 foot setback will accommodate open parking in front of the double garages completely off the common driveway. This front setback should be more than adequate since the driveway is private and because of the low number of units within the project. Interior side yard setbacks will be 5 feet minimum. This is due to: (1) the larger proposed building and (2) the building on lots 7-8 cannot shift to the south because it is at the end of the private drive and also due to the depth and location of existing utility services. Rear yard setbacks will be+35 feet to the public right-of-way for the building on lots 1-2, 21± +o 24- feet to the private open space for the buildings on lots 3-6, and 32- feet to Golden Valiey Estates for the building on lots 7-8. The rear set- backs are a result of maintaining front and side yard setbacks. Proposed lot areas will remain similar to existing. � • May 21, 1984 MIDTO�JN GOLDEN UALLEY, MN Lot Areas Existing Proposed Block 1, lot 1 6788 s.f. 6988± s.f. lot 2 4133 s.f. 4200± s.f. lot 3 4225 s.f. 4500± s.f. lot 4 4736 s.f� 4700± s.f. lot 5 4725 s.f. 4580± s.f. lot 6 5309 s.f. 4800± s.f. lot 7 5631 s.f. �300± s.f. lot 8 7573 s.f. 7570t s.f. � , . f • . � . � � � I ..._� . � . I BEARINGS SHOWN ARE A ' �- ` SSUMED �DENOTES IRON MONUMENT I ��-� ���: I t,, I ,,�,�'x- � � . �fc��+� �/ �Q6��'�J�S ' ,,�.�, SCAIE IN FEET , � � �' i � � .� �� . �:���wtn I 0� 50 100 150 200 250 • �D'�a� �: - �'. ��'� � . % �,A�' :: ; � _II� . . ... �,, •' w •� � . � . 1 . . , � � /� � 1 / . _.. ... " ../ �0 p•O . / - >- - - � -. �`���,, - , .. - � 0 ,,�a�.:_s I -' . � 4�4 �f=,� ��,....� .t ,Sa� �r i �,.,.f � " / ...«'":'S•M� �� E.ts- ---�� . �¢ ".W .g�E ��'��f r � :y�,•••, �2q 1 �� :,��3 �•��c[ _ ��� O� ��`;y9���;� �R��� � - / , ` �(� �Rtf) i.,...;0' i ..::'•, � � �/�� ?�,, � • v` g��I['a�' �- / � "�_�_s � a.0� �R ,,�' .�"�` �' : I "`— -. � � �v� � �g[i��./` �. � v ,... �: '* � � ! •:?� : ��x �NB9'l13:a T � .: 0 �, a � ��?.� .: ��r�, . ..,.�,�,�. .... T � � � � ^ • " . �•rd13 Jf:7 •• IB��' "��9 ls� . .� . t � � � - s w ; �1;�� � �.{� � .L3J � 1 '^ � ;"��: � F � ( �/ 2 ' 2 0 . � � � ! i . `. ' `� � � � i ' � . . � . i 4y � �� � � './ GJ ! &�` .. �.h �\ �� • �0 � � b� e' ti \ �� i s •i � p.\�. / � .�; r' Z �2 ;+ .3 �. A '�� 1 �,;, , � � `,^ . � � ' � �` : �a 4 '� j °�' � y, a � y � i . ,,-.o�, �'••.. �- 4 �'�; �� 1 ! ° Z b -. � . `"^.n�.».�c i . ; � � � / � .;v � - c9.�---1---- -_so ` �n'�..- 5 l6`tt+ -�'r 1. � 2 w • � � 1BA0 36, ��-�'_ fi...r �S, y_ .�_ ,��. �.. iqp7J0 I ••- r9li �.•• '." 1S � . Q :;'0�. ?'s'rr+"�i!.YB9'37li:✓i: '¢� �,... riSe. �'.. . : 5M� ... • . . I � �?h �F /1�3f1 � -. �OijO;,,•." . re , ��i. .� ', n' i3:' .�SeJ ,K'�.� ��r` � �1��.�0 6 �� y' W j �' --�--' --•.- ' �-- �7• �G �.r 3�. �19 �art��� b � a� � IZ i • � �... i0� T i. � :+J+�� . � � ` `v . . W �" i ������ � i�� -��Nlt:'f3f� �'c ia . � ��V� � �� �� �-�-�.i �.+� �''' ••� /iGb 7 ,� �Z I � �3 �� .�F.S�Ap'�I!'.f y!G17liq Ela+r � .� .; �� � i �� � t� n� ' �'� 2 ..`1'p A :� 'r8'C ///;6 �� '-W ti . � �= � � �p � :.-M '1�.�' �. �� Sd9J'3G'E i � . . . � . � � ♦ : ��I —_ � A '. X_'N �;.. �"'�•�7�.;h.C.rAGf i .. = . . ,' . `K t �`r - � �. //J:i�i�AfE.vfr'-- � �j � TZp'. - ---__� A!B93%�'!G._. '' � $ � -. ' � � . — .. ► i97B OA.;:v.oG�r _".�� ��-!.� �-.`• + ( � � — --- � .rs` a..r,r� Z -------- _; � ; � ' 9 �� . E.ofl,rrEr�.,. '� , . � 'f^"�i L�✓.ei{do��r' _ �//61 .'-i . .�. � � . f'�'��'4.r�i: -3J6�7;ra:-- ' - 'd84'I�SO'f""-.�'__"�-- . - , _ d1i93l�i,c,..wJC✓��SJAIi✓nL•.Ifj) � � . . . . .r.. ._ . . . . CGU1:Tf �ECO�DCR, Menn��in County, <<,i�nesota � ._ _ . -- ,, ., . _ _ . . . ...__. .... ... . . . ... . . -- ...., f! � �;E�' ?��� ., : . �.:. � �r-''� ����; ���� �, ����?'£ i .;'' • ''_ ¢ i � .. .. r �s !, '"�.c•£ H , . . '�a , � � �gv� �✓ �'+;,-"y,�2�!t�S�`�.y`;'� . ..,. ,� . � ,� "+d" "o . ;;' .�""' .tl1a.�y�+q�J�. r �' �.�¢'.. ',r,,.� , �', : ���� �p,�� � / '' .:w„M"�°'°"'. � � 2 �J`f�,��'�S ��lAlji F' , �.�'�,:9 W' f. Z r �,e.�B'/�� � . � .J° A`�� 'Jf� /� �'0 e: ','��*Yy��,i✓ef' .'y"' �. . ,�, � .IFJ '' � • ,� �� ,,,` �..�` ���,�� � f �F� M \ � � .��(.�n� . i•• � �'d �, " . . i . . f: f � ! . �� ��`"(�+: r ����� f, t � b"�;,�t'� � :•r`' .� �/� � 4� �%:`vc AT? . . .�.,� �f-�'� :� , �e .w � Y"�3�; ��,. •� ,/I� 't } 2 : � '�'�t f '�f� �. �'� � L . s''F� '�� �,,�" �`�� F `1�t ''' ,'.� �� � ...�� ''2 �� ' ��;� � � � r �� ��� s`.� �T' � �`�� .''j! � � .... S � f 1 � �: r . � � � '��,xti� "�`` .O ;� �� •�,����+, .rr�f �� . �, {3.. •'�r'�{;�.�'°'�, �\ � �`.�, .,, �:� �`;�, .. r' '� � ,�3s:��� r : ocL ,,�,M.�;,��, i:`�_ . ,y� ! � �"e.p�:��^c 4. .1'� ,��0D� � \ � +{F + ' � �.:' f"^3;��' +bC' � . � ��t",. ' L fl�f � ¢4 . y � . ; . . 1✓, `i.'' . '"^�$. � � �.' '�.�'yf:-0_.::����.2 � . •k '•.\ f � � 8 � f '� .:i'� r.+,... � . ��'� . t � !'� � 8 � � � s.� r g� .�'t �,,✓ .: ✓'�:` �.47•� ' T R •�L � : ``�\`� �� .,r,•rf �0.N`" ..''� � .� � y'o'• � O����O• Y-•.. .. ♦ �. U1 � . Jt � i ''�rf `r! � 1„�.'. � ��'�.+'���, : ?� 5,�; � �` '.` �N .. ,, 3� .. . �^ � � �'i h�����t�,b,• �,.�,;��- �,��'�.< < 3 \ �� � �a, ' t �``1:;,�, �,,,�....., F ��?�.f ', � s .,r ..� .� �s•,� > ; x :*r � � ��. � �j0 q � �. : .1'�� �N�` ��� t0 ��r`�dM�• ,� .�,� � ���:/.� ^` ���``y✓-fo -�`� � � � ���� \ • � ,����,*` ,��� +. e 4�,t.1 m �,,..,� �` � A€,�• � ,� ���. .. '� '�f� � � ��$.l� `�.x�� k� � �� � 4r.`�: `�: y'l' �� �o ..., � o � �� (051";�� �'� `�S', �Y� ..:. � �. � \ LL �� �e �. :�' t f m � 1 ,o �L � f �. �� \. , � �. �' �. �� g�l� "� ; e�a � .. -�•� _ yp, :t� t'�,a� � .<Hi � � ,�.� ¢ ;,� \ � Y � � � \ _ ��i t � � � ��.� � . ) b , i . ♦ � . � .. .: � 0 �v { � � \ �!lr6t di , � t V` � � � , i 1 9 L ,�� � E � o a ` �� r� �C�•5 � � u� � � r �, 14.� 4 :.;�� � ;�� ��` 1.� � `'14.L � ` � `�8,.: �.��;�a�" `�, "� _ .t .� V 1 , , \ ` ' .i: �� ,, � � �y!� `' � `, . ,'� � �� � � � � 5 "� �j :t _:` M'J � -�.�` �� � / r rc..:: 2 �83 + i� 9s.a �.9.o E�t� 3a.o � :�:^ a,,. �`:� �,•,�° � � � _ } ..� � .� o: M �- , ` ��+ c � r t.i .........�� E�, :;., . 3G,,r� Sp�y o,ry �r �� . . � G1K�1'r t .��� ?� L.li���c �5.3 Z.Z4y: 94.1lr+� x '�i�iNV.b�3.0 '�G ><�: > 9j '``�. ti , ..��/°'�� � .. � x �:,. < $ 'SIW 3 i� ��/S : 2 =. , o�€ a�. � ' .a V1,o �A4.4 '►3. �O a ��° ``� ^a � �� , ;Z� z 35.6 �'r• 4 i°t , �� TLOT �' ,_� � '� / � ,}y � �� ��< ` � � ��, z. a� :'� 1� f ;.9 �... .�: � ,,, �, � � `. � I � �s.Z � �1 ,,., e � -0 } � ::�.. �� '°�c.�'i •�. �tl � � '1L.5 ,1 . .�„,� .�... G�. '� i c,r� ,58 ' ' + �� �:�' 'a�`ti^, }3 ,�; o �:i� �i. 'n°p' >'i,?:,,; .�"- E� .65� � 7 Y I � �. � : �� , ��� � � � a � � i �'< . ,�� .;t. O � ^...N t a . ?. ^\� b �. 3� � ��IJ� ' �. „�� � ( � f- �t �tj �� � 50.0 _ '� __ °. NY.zr '� � � .^a3s� � .��;e�•:;,;<:F.� x��� `� 5:: , y'�w�O s ��:.a�r�t�,. � X. ..8 ;s i • '.i � . r r � � r�. �.�,. 898 '. .� � E wi.45 = �..., $.po:• ; ''�. $� `� 896;� Y .� — � � < ° �....: , .,�. , �:� � $ s � � ; ...�� :''��'.�• =4.0' - � fi p...: M �t ,�". ,.,�� �;� i a..,,�,� � Ak � +�G8-�i�p►�'lioo 'o �,,,wf' �'` � i=¢� . -' S : .,,,., � ,� TbP 89i.d>. —�► � n„ ar: S f ��� �<,. �,,,.:.% : INY. p� J �' +�` ',.,.... „��.`. ..�k ��f'`� �� ^' ... !�m� � � t� 1 ; t 3 `s��, �.'� . %'..�1 Zh�P @ .� —�1 � � �I .� ,{� � ��`�4"�8 ` . ... .._ e `� ''"��� r - 1. �� q � . � ,•wh.o.o .pp,� ' .' ....�'�6eo°'... ,J Q �^e0<�(� � �' � '^��.+ ��� ��� p� .:iw..n° ����;.4Z�\^.v`� :.� ` � : � �� $� z - 7 �i '�j��. . ��0� <„"°°«. '"" 3�`'i ' .. � 8' ' �1 ,, ..�.`.,.,,�.� '^^ � . .., .. � s1�2 y�.< : , . . ,, .,, f �✓.. ,�} �s/ �" - r �,..�.. -- „ow,..ee n",wo,,,, , AiR< �.,,.% 1"F A' � � °a»+�zo • . . ..-„„�„H C^%�`�"1' �.e>....a .�w�... .. _....... ...... �i ' '..y�..�'<.�.�� ' ^�„`""". . •r�'� t +� � ' '.�°M° �---- "`�," ,.... ,..�,.� ...,�,.....,... � f.:u��sT;..tMV, E$��lE�(3 p� �,�`.� �, ��� E��ar t�,�+,� � � �� . ......... ..w. � �.�,., T�IE K £xtyT � .., , .... . < � ,Mw�,�.. ..-... ���„�d�'` ... H kt�►flr�J ��.,�. w, „„ .µ. A . _..M„.... ....�.,...... � .... .�.,�,. .. , : ..,,....,,.,�.y.,,.;,;�...,.� ... ..... � Tt ` ._ �j"`,,��."" y�„�PF°P�FT'(L.�Ne.. � . . ...... �. � �����'� � -�� .. ��. .�.......�.....w: � :� M ��. �.. :..� � . �� �� � �.�..�...w... � ����� ���� � ��