09-24-84 PC Agenda ' � GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
(Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road)
September 24, 1984
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
I . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 10, 1984
, II. PRESENTATION ON RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES FOR THE CHRONICALLY MENTALLY ILL
III. DISCUSSION AND COMMENT ON GOLDEN HILLS REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
�
IV. REPORT ON BZA MEETING - SEPTEMBER 12, 1984
V. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 18, 1984
�' � VI. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED 1985 OPERATING BUDGET
, �
',
�
�
_ MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 10, 1984
� A regular meeting of the Plartning Comnission was held in the Council chambers of
the Civic Center 7800 Golden Yalley Road, Golden Valley, Np�. Chairman Forster
called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. , .
Those present were Comnissioners Forster, Leppik, McAleese, McCracken-Hunt, '
Prazak and Russell . Comnissioner Singer was absent.
Also present were Alda Peikert, Planner, and Towhid Kazi, Planning Intern.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 1984
It was moved by Comnissioner Leppik, seconded by Commissioner Prazak and carried
unanimously to approve the minutes of the August 27, 1984 Planning Commission
meeting as r�corded.
II. SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: Robert Renneke
LOCATION: 900 Florida Avenue South
REQUEST: Approval of Used Automobile Sales in the Industrial
Zoning District
• Chairman Forster introduced this agenda item and informed the Cor�nissioners that
Mr. Robert Renneke has withdrawn his application.
III. AMENDMENTS TO THE GOLDEN VALLEY ZONING ORDINANCE
A. HELIPORT
Chairman Forster introduced this agenda item and asked Planner Alda Peikert for
additional comments.
Ms. Peikert stated that currently the Golden Va11ey Zoning Ordinance does not
make provision for heliports. The proposed amendment will allow a heliport as a
Conditional Use in Cortenercial, Business and Professional Offices, Light
Industrial , Industrial and Institutional Zoning Districts.
After considerable discussion, the Planning Commission reached a consensus on
the following list of eleven items, not intended to be all inclusive, as guide-
lines for considering specific Conditional Use Permit requests for heliports in
Commercial , Business and Professional Offices, Light Indusrial, Industrial and
Institutional Zoning Districts:
1 . Documentation of approvals required by other agencies including but not
limited to the Federal Aviation Administration, Minnesota Department of
Transportation and Metropolitan Airports Conanission.
2. Documentation of liability insurance secured by the applicant for the
. heliport.
- Planning Conmission Minutes of September 10, 1984 -2-
� �
3. Provision of a safety barrier around helicopter operational areas. The
barrier may take the form of a fence, wall , or a hedge. Any barrier used
should be high enough to present a positive deterrant to persons inadver-
tently entering an operational area and yet be low enough to be Aonhazardous
to helicopter operations. See Minnesota Code of Agency Ru1es (14MCAR)
•1 .3001 - 1 .3029 available upon request at the Planning Department.
4. Fire protection, dependent upon the size and number of helicopters to be
accomnodated, the number of occupants, and the fuel load of the helicopter.
(For details see F.A.A. Advisory Circular AC 150/5390-1B pp 44-e. )
5. Height restrictions: Minimum altitude of 300 feet to be maintained above
ground at the heliport site except for take off and landing. .
6. Landing and take off frequency and hours of operation.
7. Inclusion of maintenance facilities or fuel storage at the heliport site.
8. Limitations on number of users and on number of helicopters stored at the
heliport site.
9. Proximity to residential areas.
10. Type of equipment and documentation of noise levels generated by equipment.
• 11 . Placement of a time limit on the Conditional Use Permit providing an oppor-
tunity for review of the operation and revision of conditions at the time of
renewal after a specified trial period of time.
It was moved by Comrnissioner Prazak, seconded by Commissioner Leppik and carried
unanimously to reconmend City Council approval of the proposed amendment to the
Golden Yalley Zoning Ordinance to provide for heliports as a Conditional Use in
the Commercial , Business and Professional Offices, Light Industrial , Industrial
and Institutional Zoning Districts and to further recomnend that the eleven
items listed be added to the Zoning Ordinance Administrative Manual for review
of specific applications for heliports.
Commissioner McAleese suggested that the City Attorney be asked to review the
list of considerations recortnoended for inclusion in the Administrative Manual
and to research the legal questions of Federal and State preemption and private
nuisance actions.
B. MANUFACTURED HOUSING
Chairman Forster introduced this agenda item and asked Planner Alda Peikert for
additional comrnents.
Ms. Peikert stated that the Golden Yalley Zoning Ordinance requires amendment to
bring it into conformance with recent°state legislation concerning manufactured
� housing. Ms. Peikert added that municipalities may regulate manufactured
r Planning Comnission Minutes of September 10, 1984 -3-
• housing through various performance standards, but cannot prohibit manufactured
housing.
It was moved by Conmissioner Leppik, seconded by Conmissioner Russ�ll and voted
unanimously to reconmend City Council approval of the proposed amendment to the
Zon�ing Ordinance to provide for regulation of manufactured homes in Residential
Districts as recomnended by staff.
C. CONDITIONAL USES IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT
Chairman Forster introduced this agenda item and asked Planner Alda Peikert for
conenents.
Ms. Peikert stated that staff finds no objection to inclusion of conditional
uses currently in the Light Industrial Zoning District as conditional uses in
the Industrial Zoning District.
It was moved by Commissioner Leppik, seconded by Co►rmiissioner McAleese and voted
unanimously to reconmend City Council approval of proposed amendments to Section
7:03 of the Gol den Val l ey Zoni ng Ordi nance as recort�nended by staff.
IV. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 4, 1984:
� Chairman Forster provided the Planning Con�nission with a report on the
September 4, 1984 City Council meeting.
V. REPORT ON HRA MEETING _ SEPTEMBER 10, 1984:
Chairman Forster provided the Plannjng Cort�nission with a report on the
September 10, 1984 meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA).
Chairman Forster reported that Golden Valley HRA has referred the Golden Hills
Redevelopment Plan to the Planning Commission for connnents. Chairman Forster
asked staff to put the Golden Hills Redevelopment Plan on the agenda for the
next meeti ng of the P1 anni ng Con�ni ssi on.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
. . orster, ha rman argaret eppi , ecretary
�
� T0: GOLDEN YALLEY PLANNING CONqNISSION DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 1984
FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, PLANNER
SUBJECT: PRESENTATION ON RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES FOR THE CHRONICALLY- N�NTALLY
ILL
Ms. Eileen Moran, Executive Director of the Northwest Hennepin Human Services
Council, will attend the September 24, 1984 meeting of the Planning Commission
to provide information and answer questions on the issue of residential
faciilties for the chronically mentally ill.
A request for a Conditional Use Permit for a facility of this type may come
before the Planning Co�mnission in the near future. City of Golden Valley
Planning staff has been contacted by a recipient of funding for such a facility
proposed for a Golden Valley location.
Included for your information are background materials complied by Planning
Intern Towhid Kazi on the subject of residential facilities for the chronically
mentally ill .
Attachments:
� 1 . August 21 , 1984 Memorandum from the Mayor
2. June 12, 1984 Letter from Ms. Eileen Moran
3. July 31 , 1984 Memorandum on Residential Facility for Chronically Mentally
I11
4. Community-Based Residential Facilities: Perspectives and Choices (Booklet
enclosed separately)
�
� OATE: August 21, 1984
T0: Bi11 Hobbs. Chair of the Human Rights Commission
Bill Forster, Chair of the Planning Commission .
�FROM: Mayor Mary E. Anderson y�►• _
RE: Residentiai Facilities for Chronicall Mentally I11
The Council has had a presentation on Residential Facilities for the Mentally
I11 by Eileen Moran, Executive Director of the Northwest Hennepin Human Services
Council. We do not now have a specific proposal for such a facility in Golden
Va11ey, but feel it is a sub3ect your Cammissions would be interested in. We
would like you to lnvite Ms. Moran to one of your meetings to share with you the
information presented to the Council .
MEA:pb
cc: Eileen Moran
�
�
W
M NORTHWEST HENNEPIN
� c HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL
7323 - 58th Avenue No. Cryst�l, MN 55428
(612) 536-0327 _-
�L��E,O
R��' �a
� 19
a�,.�
Mayflr Mary Anderson
June 12, 1984 ���,
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Va11ey, 55427
Dear Mayor Anderson:
The issue of residential care for chronically mentally ill
adults has been an important concern of the Legislature,
the Hennepin County Board, the Minneapolis City Council and
some suburban City Councils in recent years.' The difficulties
related to providing residential care are a combined result
• of legislative changes, zoning and site location ordinances,
Department of Human Services rules, stigmas and myths, and
the ever present shortage of funds .
In May of this year, Hennepin County released six Requests
For Proposals, indicating an intent to establish six additional
residential programs for the mentally ill to start up by
November of this year. Clear direction has been given to
potential vendors to seek locations outside of the alread}•
impacted areas of Minneapolis. Legislation passed in this
last session directs counties to establish a moritorium on
new facilities in these areas to relieve over-concentration,
and to implement a dispersal plan that will direct residential
programs to be located in other parts of the County. We are
aware that several of these potential vendors are actively
looking for suitable sites in suburban communities. Perhaps
you have already been contacted in this regard.
The Northwest and West Hennepin Human Service Councils are
prepared to be of assistance to suburban City Councils and
Planning Commissions by providing information that would
� be helpful in the process of working through some of the
steps involved in locating a residential facility in a suburban
community.
• We offer am excellent manual that covers the legal snd regulatory
aspects, provides summarized information on Human Services
rules and good information on mental health clients and programs.
At your request and convenience, a member of our group could
come to a City Council or a Planning Commission meeting,
highlight the manual and leave it with you. We could also
provide you with some information about existing program
�6.5Z�
� Nu: wcst tlenncpin Human Servi � p, �
• and resources and other information that wauld assist you
in working with your ccmmunity.
Even if you are not involved in a conditional use process
right now, we believe that the materials would be useful
for the future. Because of the new State laws and the timing
of the Requests For Proposals, we would like to meet with
you within the next 60 days.
Please call Eileen Moran at 536-0327 to arrange for a convenient
time.
Sincerely,
� .t.4.�,,.. `'I�-�,.�.,,-�
Eileen Moran
Executive Director
• N.W.H.H.S.C.
cc: Planning Commission Chair• G. william Forster
City Manager . Bill Joyne�
�
EM/j d �
•
( ��/
� July 31, 1984
T0: Bill Joynes, City Manager
FROM:. Towhid Kazi , Planning Intern
RE: Residential Facility for Chronically Mentally I11
In response to your inquiry on Residential Facility for Chronically Mentally I11
dated July 3, 1984, I have gathered some information on the subject which is
summarized in the following:
1 . State Law (Ref: Sec. 245.812, Subdivision A pp2 line 7-22) dictates that
licensed residential facilities serving seven (7) throuyh sixteen (16) per-
sons are allowed in the multiple family residential district. Licensed resi-
dential facilities serviny six or fewer mentally retarded or physically
handicapped persons are allowed in sinyle family residential districts.
A municipal zoniny authority may require a Conditional Use Permit in order to
assure proper maintenance and operation of a facility. Copies of Statute
and D.P.W. Rule 36 on state licensiny will be available at your request.
• 2 . The Golden Valley Zoning Ordinance (Ref: Sec. 3A.11 Item 2) provides for
residential facilities serving up to six (6) persons as a permitted use in
Residential Districts. Residential facilities serving more than six persons
may be permitted in the Residential District by majority vote of the City
Council .
Residential facilities are allowed in Multiple Uwelling and Institutional
(I-3) Districts as a Conditional Use. (For further description see attached
Golden Valley Zoning Ordinance.)
The Golden Valley Zoning Ordinance provides for residential facilities for
chronically mentally ill and will not require any ammendment.
3 . Zoning Code provisions are different in different communities. For a com-
parison of other community aoniny codes with Golden Valley reyardiny resi-
dential facilities for mentally ill , the attached chart miyht be helpful .
Our Zoning Code is much more flexible on this matter compared with other
neighboriny communities' zoning ordinances.
4. Most corrmiunities I have talked to had little or no experience with residen-
tial facilities for chronically mentally ill . Wayzata and Bloomington are
.the two suburban cor►miunities which have residential facilities for chroni-
cally mentally ill . Most of the facilities are located in Minneapolis.
This is the first time Hennepin County is trying to decentralize the resi-
dential facilities for chronically mentally ill . Cor�nunity reaction to
�
Bill Joynes, City Manayer
July 31, 1984 �
• Paye 2
residential facilities for chronically mentally ill has been mixed. North
West Residence, Inc, applied to the City of Brooklyn Center for the
establishment of a facility which was denied by the City Council, Currently
there is a lawsuit against the City of Brooklyn Center in the Supreme Court.
Attached you will find a copy of the lawsuit.
If we need any further information, Eileen Moran (NWHSC) would be an
excellent source of information to whom questions may be addressed.
The following background materials are available in our department if you are
interested:
a) Community-Base Residential Facilities: Perspectives and Choices
b) Information on Chronic Mental Illness and Residential Facilities
Thank you.
TK:ga
Enclosures
•
�
. �
Section 3A.10 Con't
• 3. wo ruildins perait shall be i�sned rith �
r�spect to the rin �traeture ior a •ingle I
"� ioil� avellinj �ot 6avin� a �arage tmles�
t6e stji�t�red surny wbaitted at the
tise the appiication fos tbe baildini per- (
tit is rde rsflects tbe �ecessary a�ount _ �
of space tor t6e location of a prage,
thich oill �eet the setbacts and other r
t�qnirraent� of t6i• Section. �
sEClION 3J1_ .11. !he ioiloving provisions shaii apply to sroup
. ��� �
1. the �enc� os o�perator of the =zoup hose
� shall. prior to the �ctual operation of
�. said 6o�e� r�gistet vith the Citr Clerk by �
providiag a statment of intent rith the
iolloviag infori■ation:
a. llise and addre�s of the property ,
owoer;
b. llase of the a,sency or �roup represen- I
tative re�ponsible for the bome;
c. Any other pertinent infor�ation I
• sequired by the City Staff.
Z. Dp to •is per�one thall be permitted to �
occupy a �roup hose provided. however.
tbat • jreater mimber ssy be permitted by
�ajority �rote of the City Council �o long �
. as said sreater number does not e�cceed the
inwber allo�red tinder tbe •tandards and
=egulation� of the Minnesota Departsent of
Velfase and tlut the Croup Hose coatinues �
to be operated in accordanee dth �aid �
•tandards aad ao �uch �reater smDer than
�i: �hall be peraitted. ezcept upon; �
a. !he Iwldin� of a public heasing �
iollorins aotiee �iven to all adjacent
- re�idents or propert� aruers in the l
sase �nner u sequired by laa for •
sazoning of properties;
�
_ l
• L
. `
.
�ection 3A.11. Con't
�. �e �ceipt by the Council of a report
�ros the �dainistrative staff of the
• Cit� wttliniq� !ts rscarendatioa�
•ith tsspect to �ny �nch Sreater
�aber, �ich srport shall be received
�nd �ade pblic �t tbe �foresaid
6saring; �nd
c. !he rsceipt of reports fro' �uch �dvi-
�ory ea�ission �s tbe Council �hall �
��ea �e�irable. �fiich seports sball
litarise be rde public.
. 3. The ageacy os organisation respoaaible for
the �roup Lo�e thall. prior to the ccmmen-
e+:ent of the actual operation of said
� 6ou, ford an advisory committee xith the
advice and consent of the Citq Council�
- for the purpose of resolving problems
ohich �sy arise. The advisory committee
' ahall provide � teans of communication
_ between the agency. the neighDorhood, the
commuaity and the school district, and
. shall l�ave amoag its sembers the
folloving: A responaible sember of the
- agency operating the home. two represen-
tativea from the neighborhood in vhich the
� • home is located, a �ember of the Human
- tights Commission of Colden Valley, a
aember of t�e City Police Departsent.
' and a representative of the school
district in v'hich the home i� located.
. i. �io fo�ter sroup ��e shall be allowed
vithin one �ile of aaother foater sroup
- 6ose. .
` S. Tbe agency or operator of the aroup home
_ shall perait the Duilding Inspector, the
Fire Marshall and the 8ealth Officer to
- inspect tbe interior and aterior of the
prem3ses at aay reasoaable tise and apon
the iiving of reasonabie notice.
. •
., • . e
�ection 3A.11 con t
� 6. !he =+�aideace and wrra�undini preaises
�. oades.�tb� eontroi oi the aaenc� or opera-
, tot of the D�e �hali be riatained in s
el�an� osderi� aod safe e�ndition.
7• Zhe a,�eacy or operator of the lw�e �hall -
� aot per�it any �eti�ities a�sociat�d Mth
. the hose to interf�re �rith the health,
, •aiet�. relfare� eafort, or sspose of the
neighborhood or the City.
. '
•
ZONING CODE COMPARISONS
�
Cit District Permitted Conditional
1. Minnetonka Multiple Family X
(Boardiny House (R-4, R-5) _
for 6 or more) (PUD)
Lodging House
2. St. Louis Park Single Family Residential X �
(Group Home) (R-1) , (R-2)
(6 or less)
Two Family Residence X
District (R-3)
Multiple Family X
Residence District
3. Crystal Medium Density X X
(�oardiny House) Residential (R-3) (limited to (more than
(Multiple Family) not more lU persons)
than 10
persons)
(Nursiny Home or High Density X X
• Group Housing) Residential (R-4) (limited to (more than
(Multiple Family) not more 10 persons)
than 10
persons)
4. Plymouth (FRD) Future Restricted Devel- X
(Residential opment District
Care Facility
in accordance Low Density X
with State Single Family Residential
Statutes) (R-lA)
Low Density Residential X
(R-16)
5. New Hope Single and Two Family Resi- X
(Family Care dential (R-2) (Family Care
Facility 6 or Facility)
less Multi-Family Residential (R-4) X
or (Group Care
Group Care Facility)
Facility 7 or
more)
�
ZONING CODE COMPARISONS
�
City District Permitted Conditional
6. Bloomington Single Family Residential X _
(Residential (R-lA, R-1) (6 persons
Facility) or less)
Multiple-Family Residential X
(R-4) (7-i6 person
amended to
25)
Multiple-Family Residential X
(RM-12) (7-25
persons)
Multiple-Family Residential X
(RM-24) (7-25
persons)
7. Robbinsdale All Residential X X
(less than 6 persons) (if within
1320 ft. of
another
facility)
• Multiple Dwelliny X
8. Golden Valley Residential X �
(Group Home up (more than 6 persons needs the
to six personsj approval of the majority of
the City Council )
Multiple Dwelliny X
Institutional (I-3) X
�
� T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COFM9ISSION DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 1984
FROM: �I..DA PEIKERT, PLANNER
SUBJECT: GOLDEN HILLS REDEYELOPMENT PLAN -
The Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) on September 10,
1984 received the Draft Golden Hills Redevelopment Plan and referred it to the
Planning Commission for review and comment.
Procedure for establishment of a redevelopment district, as outlined in State
Statute, is initiated by means of preparation of a redevelopment plan for HRA
consideration. The HRA refers the redevelopment plan to the Planning Commission
with a request for the written opinion of the Planning Co�rnission on the redeve-
lopment plan. Following Planning Commission review and comment, the plan is
referred to the City Council, which holds a public hearing and makes findings. "
.Following City Council approval by resolution, the HRA has the authority to
undertake redevelopment activities within the established redevelopment
district.
The purpose of the Golden Hills Redevelopment Plan is to es�ablish the Golden
Hills Redevelopment District in accordance with State Statute requirements. A
� redevelopment plan, as defined by State Statute, outlines redevelopment of the
area to be covered by the redevelopment project. and indicates general land uses.
The Draft Golden Hi11s Redevelopment Plan, as directed by Statute, designates
general land uses for each redevelopment area within the proposed Golden Hills
Redevelopment District. The Golden Hills Redevelopment Plan does not provide
detailed concept plans for various areas of the proposed redevelopment
district.
Establishment of the District gives the HRA the authority to purchase property
within the District boundaries for purposes of redevelopment. This authority is
required for HRA conclusion of a �oint acquisition agreement with the Minnesota
Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for joint purchase of properties required
in part for I-394 right-of-way and in part for proposed redevelopment.
Funding of public costs of redevelopment pro3ects, including land acquisition,
requires the additional step of establishing a tax increment financing district.
Following establishment of the redevelopment district, the HRA would propose one
or more tax increment financing districts within the redevelopment district.
Establishment of a tax increment financing district involves HRA preparation of
a tax increment financing plan and City Council approval of the tax increment
financing plan. The City Council is required to hold a public hearing and pass
a resolution making findings.
�
� Golden Valley Planning Commission Page Two
September 19, 1984
The HRA on September 10, 1984 appointed a committee of HRA Co�nissioners, Dave
Thompson and Larry Bakken, to return to the HRA at the October meeting with a
recommendation for procedure for implementation of the Golden Hills
Redevelopment Pro3ect. Property owners within the proposed District have
already approached City staff with redevelopment suggestions for initial phases
of the Golden Hills Redevelopment Project. Procedure is required for handling
of these proposals and for development of nrore detailed plans for other areas.
At this time, it is appropriate for the Planning Commission to comment on the
outline for redevelopment and on the general land uses specified in the Draft
Golden Hills Redevelopment Plan. At the same time, the Planning Commission may
make recomnendations concerning procedure for development of detailed concept
plans, including recommendations for Planning Commission participation in con-
tinued planning for the Golden Hills Redevelopment Project.
Attachment: Draft Golden Hills Redevelopment Plan (Enclosed separately)
�
�
� T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 1984
FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, PLANNER
SUBJECT: PROPOSED 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION BUDGET -
Attached is a copy of the Planning Commission portion of the proposed 1985 City
of Golden Valley Operating Budget. The proposed budget includes conference
funds for attendance of two Planning Commissioners at the National American
Planning Association (APA) Conference, attendance of two Planning Commissioners
at the State APA Conference and attendance of three Planning Commissioners at
the local Land Use Planning Workshop. Also included is $200 for books and
publications listed under Dues and Subscriptions.
A City Council public hearing on the proposed City of Golden Valley 1985
Operating Budget is scheduled for Tuesday, September 25, 1984 at 7:00 P.M. in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center. If the Planning Commission wishes to °
comment on the proposed budget, �t would be appropriate to send a spokesperson
to the hearing.
Attachment: Planning Cort�nission Program of Proposed 1985 Operating Budget
�
�
�
�
• N ��
� �n u a�
°: o�°
t� ca s
o�
c
�
e
c
^ M T O O H'►1L�� � • �!f Op Iff IA '
6 1!f �C "'� �I .r � N N N e A
� � �C N! I�f Nf
01 !� �
� � � M M
6, C
d O O O� .��i 1� � t�0
�' �l O .•a .�r � aT O+
� E .-i .•� .-r
.�w
�
W
M M
CJ
O O O O O O O
�++ v a � .-�i N N c�v a�o
Of O
�'C
4
W W M p
��
J O
a�
>m
� W a r► .+ a u� �n �. �. � v
°�. a^'o � '" '" v v "" '" o o � �
C9� � V � N
IL d a Rf Ih !� 1
O O
�� W M
�..Q�
i..i.�
N �O N N M .� � 1� �,y � O O O
�� N N rl r1 Q
�a
M M
N
W
O�
L
C A
O t
�
V
� �
Vf L N
CW7 � Y �
d! a7 t��i S ~ L t.�.f
w O O L � � y � N '
�
G d N Vf O 7 �0 �r0 d
� W W W N N f�i 9� Y H u a+ ^
C W L L v �C T T > a� O p y a �
� U r0 i0 � O � � � .r. y� L id 9 L 01
O ' �+ L N d a W O 01 �i p Y Y
f..7 � O OO i G a N CY C VIOV� N
OG O�O�N W � 9 O r O � d r •
C C W 61 0! C d N N J N�+ Ci O N � _
O II9pCd'�+++ Q L O W W V► N
R1 1 1 C r` V/ Ol � 01 Z � = I.i r -�
+� J N g� ai y �O N 47 C iO � O. �O Q C� �O O
L � 01 E W E M W N� i� t� W � ++ J 67 a+ �+
• pp?� r Qz
�O ti N �O L�•.L�+ ~ G �1 L ~ �y � 0`) ~ tW.i w Y� ~ ~
'� W S W �+ G y N 01 C N C W
0I W r0 > �Ol � Ot� � ONOi �+ 07
O d 04JOC N O C�d�t7 �C.�O
C
O
r
s u I �^I{A 10 �l�l N fa�f 4N'f r/�
r Y r1 e�1�� N N Af!�f Pf Q
C Q �P V V'V' �t a ��?Q ��t