08-08-83 PC Agenda GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
(Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road)
Au9ust 8, 1983
� 7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
I . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 25, 1983
II . CONTINUATION. OF INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
' "TOLG" ADDITION
APPLICANT: Courey, Schwinn, Kodadek and McRoberts, P.A.
LOCATION: 206 Sunnyridge Lane
REQUEST: Approval of Preliminary Plat of "Tolg
Addition"
II1 . MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE
IV. REPORT ON CITY COI�NCiL MEETING - AUGUST 2, 1983
� V. REPORT ON PACAC MEETING - JULY 26, 1g83
VI . NOTIFICATION OF SEMINAR ON THE BASICS OF ZONING ADMINISTRATION
�
� MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 25, 1983
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chambers
of the Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota.
Chairman Thompson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
Those present were Commissioners Polachek, Prazak, Singer, Thompson and
Tubman. Cormnissioner Leppik was not present at the beginning of the meeting.
Commissioner Forster was absent.
Also present were Mike Miller, Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator, and
Alda Peikert, Assistant Planner.
I . Approval of Minutes - July 11, 1983
It was moved by Commissioner Prazak, seconded by Commissioner Singer and
carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the July 11, 1983 Planning
Commission meeting as recorded.
II. Informal Public Hearing - Rezoning
APPLICANT: International Development, Inc.
� LOCATION: 7700 Wayzata Boulevard
REQUEST: Change Zoning from Residential to Business
and Professional Offices Zoning District
Chairman Thompson introduced this agenda item and referred Planning
Commissioners to copies of a letter from the proponent requesting that the
P`lanning Commission defer consideration of the proposed rezoning until the
August 22, 1983 Planning Commission meeting. The letter was distributed to
Planning Commissioners along with a staff recommendation for postponement of
this agenda item until the September 12, 1983 Planning Commission meeting.
Commissioner Leppik arrived at the meeting.
Chairman Thompson recognized Mr. A1 Stobbe, who was present to represent the
proponent. Mr. Stobbe stated that the proponent desires a postponement until
after the August 1, 1983 date given by the Minnesota Department of �
Transportation (MnDOT) for finalization of I-394 right of way requirements.
For the benefit of residents attending for the scheduled informal pub1ic
hearing, Chairman Thompson reviewed the staff recommendation for denial of the
rezoning request at this time and stated agreement with the requested post-
ponement as the best course of action. Chairman Thompson informed residents
that neighboring property owners will be renotified by mail when the rezoning
� comes before the Planning Commission again.
Planning Commission Meeting - July 25, 1983 Page 2
�
It was moved by Co�nissioner Singer, seconded by Correnissioner Polachek and
carried unanimously to defer consideration of rezoning of 7700 Wayzata
Boulevard and to reset the informal public hearing on the proposed rezoning
for September 12, 1983.
III. Informal Public Hearing - PUD #41 Preliminary Design Plan �
APPLICANT: Robert Sanko
LOCATION: 5615-5625 Olson Memorial Highway
REQUEST: Approval of Preliminary Design Plan for
PUD #41, Valley Wood
Chairman Thompson introduced this agenda item and recognized the proponent,
Mr. Robert Sanko.
Commissioner Tubman asked the proponent whether he intends to sell both units
of the subyect double bungalow. Mr. Sanko replied that he intends to sell one
unit and to continue to reside in the other unit himself.
Commissioner Leppik asked whether approval of the subject PUD would set a pre-
cedent for zero lot line division of other existing double bungalows.
Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator Mike Miller stated that approval of PUD
� #36, Lakeview Terrace, which provided for zero lot line division of four
existing double bungalows located southeast of 23rd and Winnetka Avenues
North, already set a precedent for zero lot line division using the PUD pro-
cess. Mr. Miller stated that existing double bungalows proposed for zero lot .
line division must meet specific criteria for division and that the PUD process
is the cleanest method available at this time for zero lot line division.
Commissioner Tubman asked about information given in the staff report that the
subject double bungalow was constructed in such a manner as to make it
suitable for division. Mr. Miller explained that the City Inspection
Department encourages construction of all new double bungalows in this manner.
Commissioner Prazak asked whether there are any significant costs to the City
in use of the PUD process for zero lot line division. Mr. Miller replied that
the proponent pays all costs associated with the process.
Chairman Thompson called on Mr. Sanko and asked whether he had any information
to add to the staff report and discussion. Mr. Sanko stated that he wished to
add only that he is in the process of constructing fencing which will almost
entirely surround the subject property when complete.
Commissioner Tubman asked how long there has been a tenant in the second unit,
considering the building permit was issued as recently as October 1981, and
whether Mr. Sanko wished to sell the second unit due to problems with renting.
Mr. Sanko replied that there has been a renter in the second unit since
� September 1982. Mr. Sanko stated that he has had no problems with the tenant
in the second unit but that in general he would find sale of the unit pre-
ferable to the caretaker role.
Planning Commission Meeting - July 25, 1983 Page 3
�
Chairman Thompson opened the informal public hearing for public input. There
was no one present who wished to speak on this agenda item, and Chairman
Thompson closed the informal public hearing.
It was moved by Commissioner Tubman, seconded by Coimnissioner Leppik and
carried unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the Preliminary
Design Plan for PUD #41, Valley Wood, which proposes zero lot line division of
an existing double bungalow located at 5615-5625 Olson Memorial Highway, sub-
ject to submittal with the PUD General Plan of Development of �oint owner
maintenance agreement and utility line easement documents for review and
approval by the City Attorney.
IV. Report on City Council Meeting - July 19, 1983
Commissioner Prazak provided the Planning Commission with a report on the
Ju1y 19, 1983 City Council meeting.
V. Report on HRA Meeting - July 12, 1983
Chairman Thompson provided the Planning Commission with a report on the July 12,
1983 meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA).
VI. Report on BZA Meeting - �July 12, 1983
� Commissioner Polachek provided the Planning Commission with a report on the
July 12, 1983 meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA).
VII. Update on Valley Squar2 Redevelopment Project
Chairman Thompson provided the Planning Commission with a report on the
progress of the Valley Square Redevelopment Project.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:55 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
avid hompson,, hairman argaret eppi , Secretary
.
� •
T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COM�ISSION DATE: AUGUST 3, 1983
FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT: CONTINUATIUN OF INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF "TOLG ADDITlON"
The Golden Valley Planning Commission on July 11 , 1983 continued to August 8,
1983 an informal public hearing on the Preliminary Plat of "Tolg Addition" to
allow the proponent time to .prepare a revised Preliminary Plat utilizing a cul-
de-sac design rather than a through street deslgn.
The subject parcel of land, located at 206 Sunnyri:dge Lane, is approximately two
and one half acres in size. The proponent, the law firm of Courey, Schwinn,
Kodadek and McRoberts acting on behalf of the property owners , proposes division
of the property into six lots. One lot encompasses a single fami.ly residence
currently existing on the property, and the remalning five newly creafied vacant
lots would be available for single family residential development.
The Preliminary Plat submitted with the original application proposes extension of
Roanoke Circle through the subject property to Sunnyridge Lane: The proRosed
street layout completes a loop of Roanoke Circle previously planned at the time
� of approval of Russell 's Wirth Park Addition directly to the south.
The revised Preliminary Plat submitted in response to Planning Commission direction
proposes a cul-de-sac with access off of Sunnyridge Lane.. This design leaves Roanoke
Circle as it currently exists with a cul-de�sac directly to tfi.e south of t6.e cul-
de-sac proposed .for "Tolg Addition'r.
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat of "To1g Addition" utClizi.ng
the original through street design. Reasons .for recommendation of the through
street design inctude �the following:
1 . Creation of nonconforming lots
2. Deficienci.es in terms of Minimum Subdi.vislon Design Standards for Streets
and Cui-de-sacs
3• Life safety concerns
4. Street maintenance problems
5. Inefficient watermain design
6. Drainage problems
•
Golden Vailey Planning Commission -2- August 3, 1983
• ' �
These items of concern are expanded in the following paragraphs. The City.
Engineer will be present at the August 8, 1983 Planning Commission meeting to
further explain staff concerns and answer questions. �
1 . Creation of nonconforming lots
The revised Preliminary Plat of "Tolg Addition" which proposes a cul-de-sac
design creates two �ots which are nonconforming in terms of lot width. Lots
3 and 4 are 75 feet in width at the buiiding setback line, which is 5 feet
less than the minimum 80 foot lot width required by Ordinance. Lots in the
revised plat are otherwise conforming in terms of lot size and width. On
the other hand, all six lots in the original Preliminary Plat for "Tolg
Addi.tion" utilizing a through street design exceed minimum lot size and width
requirements.
2. Deficiencies in terms of Minimum Subdivision Design Standards for Streets
and Cul-de-sacs
The existing Roanoke Circle. cul-de-sac, which would remain in the event a
through street is not completed, is deficinet in terms of the Minimum
Subdivision Design Standards contained in the City Subdivision Regulations.
Section 440.:70. (2) (a) of the City Code specifies a mi�nimum street right-
� ..:of-way:wi�th :of 60 feet for a cul-de-sac street and a minimum diameter .of
120 feet for the right-of-way for a cul-de-sac. A 50 foot street width .�
and 100 foot diameter cul-de-sac were allowed in the case of Roanoke Circle
with the understanding that the cul-de-sac situation would be temporary
and that the street would be completed through to Sunnyridge� Lane at t.�e time
of development of the subject Tolg property. fn addition, the. existZng
Roanoke Circle cul-de-sac exceeda tfis maximum allowa6.le- length. fo� a cul-d�-
sac. Section 440:70 (2) (.j� of the City �ode provides for a maxi:mum cu.l�de��sac
length of 500 feet measured along the centerline of the cu1-�e-sac street from
the point of .intersection or origin to the ertd of the right-of-way. The
existing temporary Roanoke Circle cul-de-sac is over 600 feet in length.
3. Life safety concerns
The through street design is preferable to cul-de-sac design for emergency
vehicle access and .is promoted by the Public Safety Department including
the Fire Marshal : Attached for information is a memorandum provided to the
Ci•ty �ngineer by the City of Eden Prairie explaining the advantages of through
street over cul-de-sac design from the standpoint of life safety. t
4. Street maintenance problems
The cul-de-sac design presents street maintenance problems particularly in
terms of snow plowing. in addition to providing inadequate maneuvering
space for snow plows, the cul-de-sac design is deficient in snow storage space
due ta minimal street frontage left after driveways.
•
Golden Valley Planning Commission -3- August 3. 1983
•
5• Inefficient watermain design
Looping of watermain is required for efficient operation. The watermain in
Roanoke Circle currently terminates in the existing temporary cul-de-sac
in anticipation of eventual street extenslon. In the event the street is
not connected at the time of development of the Tolg property, the watermain
s�ould nevertheless be carried through to Sunnyridge Lane. Watermain
construction through the reserved street right-of-way beyond the Roanoke
Circle cul-de-sac would take place even w.ithout street construction. A
watermain easement should be provided for connection to the proposed new
"Tolg Addition" cul-de-sac. Construction of watermain �in street right-of-
way is preferable to construction in easements over private property from
the standpeint of access for maintenance purposes:
6. Drainage probl`ems
The proposed Grading Plan for Tolg Addition presents drainage problems in
two areas: �
First, the plan calls for drainage around the cul-de-sac gutter from the
north side of the cul-de-sac to the soutih side of the cul-de-sac and onto
Sunnyridge Lane. However, the grade provided alang the gutter is i.nadequate.
The City Engineer specifies a minimum .8i grade in order to avoid standing
• water in the cul-de-sac, and the proposed Grading Plan does not provide that
minimum grade.
Secondly, the proposed cul-de-sac plan directs a large portion of the
surface water drainage to the southwest "of the subject property where a drainage
problem already exists. Drainage in that direction enters an open ditch
whi�ch has insufficient grade and tends :.to beEOme obstructed. According to the
City Engineer, one house in th� area wi.th a walkout :basement design �has exper-
ienced recurring problems .du� to the existfng drainage si:tuation. The through
street design carries a greater portton of the surface water drainage down the
street and alleviates the situation created by runoff to the southwest.
In conclusion, staff confirms the recommendation presented in the July 6, 1983 staff
report for conditional approval of the original .through street design. Recommended
conditions of approv�l ihclude completion of a drainage plen satisfactory to the
� City Engineer, addition of utility easements, and payment of park dedication. fees.
As noted in the previous staff report, the drainage plan submitted with the original
through street design Preliminary Plat was incomp]ete. The City Engineering Depart-
ment requires information on drainage of the northeasterly portion of the proposed
subdivision. A complete drainage plan satisfactory to the City Engineer should
be provided prior to City Council consideration of the Preliminary Plat.
•
Golden Valley Planning Commissian -4- August 3� 1983
�
Secondly, Section 440:70 (4) (a) of the Subdivision Regulations requires utility
easements at least 12 feet wide centered on lot lines. The standard six foot
drainage and utility easements required along side and rear property lines should
be added on the Final Plat.
Finally, Section 440-:80 (2) of the City Subdivision Regulations provides for dedication
of ten percent of the area subdivided for parks, playgrounds, public open space or
storm"water holding area or for payment of a cash amount equivalent to ten percent
of the fair market value of the undeve}oped land in the proposed subdivision. It
� is recommended that the proponent be required to pay cash in lieu of an amount
equal to ten percent of the faiK market value of the subject undeveloped property.
A fair market value figure will be �determined by the Hennepin County Principte
Appraiser assigned to the City of Golden Valley prior to consideration of the
Preliminary Plat by the City Council .
Staff suggests that the Planning Commission recommend. Ctt.y Council approval of
the original Pretiminary Plat of "Tolg Addition" utilizing a through street design
subject to the following conditions : '
l . Provision of a complete drainage plan satisfactory to the City Engineer prior
to City Council consideration of the Preliminary Plat.
2. Addition on the Final Plat of standard six foot drainage and utility easements
• along side and rear property lines.
3• PaymeRt of cash in lieu of land in an amount equivalent to ten percent of the
fair market value of the undeveloped ]and included in the Preliminary Plat.
Attachments:
l . Site Location Map
2. July 11 , 1983 Planning Commission Minutes
3. Preliminary Plat with Through Street Design
4. Preliminary Plat with Cut-de-sac Desi�gn (Full si.zed sheet enclosed separately�
5. Drainage Plan for Cul=de-sac Design .
6. City of Eden Prairie Memorandum dealing with Life Safety Aspects of Cul�de�sacs
�
• t=1i�� -"' •• , w. ." �� • i�r . �vt !
.I O' ,t�►t __� 1ul�L�`�� � � , �L� �7 [ � �; r � V� r 3Z�` � ' Z r �
O a ` •
�� . �1 � �� � �' � �
(r0 h t� � � � S �O�
`?°° w000�sTOCK �
, ; $ts �,� ,�,,� ,�os <,P9 , AVE. s
; � . _ � _ . . _ _ . . _ � � n � h
. �r° ' L- � • � .o� � � _z�_, • 1 a 31y� ,o4i �n
`� .iSB 5�� t55 S4�S3 bt 51 �So 4y� t i41 �4G o ` ytlo� � ` _ltt�l�• � �316 = ' � a .
1
I � � ' '� Q� � , :i , .I ��4 .� � _�t�uZ a ' � �'i ' 1 � � - :
. , .
.. . � : � t93�• ' � ;
�� - �� - - '.. � �s - ' �a_� 'u.t�'llfi _• �1d11' f
: � 3r� » � r� ^ Y; ~ r � �=:� � �� � to1 . . �t94 � $ � � ��5��� `_�u�!
• o *3t ��� ��3� �1 '33 3��40 4i �4 43 44'�49 "
� ;1 :,,�z ��o � r� , �; � '�n?0� ' ' t95�- � � a�4 : � �r ;
� , �
� ' r , �1 `� ��� + � � = to5 ,° t?6u� • , � b���i� � _4b�,
� '"�'�'r ' �?zo � ' ° a ," � o 't 204 �i91 � '�" ��I2 t MI •
:s'► �V� LYnr,.�� �� ' ' � at s �--- ---- w
y�'�� 4�t 4P34 I/° 4. "� � t0 19611Z�� '��JI� �' � b
1 1 v 1 Moi. i .o� � _ ' p • • � ♦. � .
3o t9 i tb '���t " � � � �
'� � , � �~ t1 . i9� ,91 �I � " �0Z ' �t.��� - Z '�,,,3♦ ° ',�M3♦= a
� ,S� i��,� °� r� si j�� �°' �Z01 ° � �Jpp�� ��, �JO� ` 4� , �f
���a c� � p� � .. "' too _` i.u�°� a o`�c�°� ` '�.i�415 ` a �}
5 0 ���� �� 4 i 5 6 � =;�g� �� • x' °�u� �� s��'i9 ' � 30�, �lol � Ili� ° Ct:
1 • lo t� IZ 1 14;15 Z
�1 � . : ��'�
��so 3,� �� ^ �30 ��4 a� � �t�i�!1b� � `ttttb°j♦` tL•it� _' `u�n . � �.i.
, "1" — — 4e . � ° �91 '�04 z '�^60 ° �o Itbt '
^ ;Lbc •I-ie'+� ^/? n ` • ° _ _ . .. �
n 1 3o t'�
� T���T�` - .�"J .� IOi6 39/O � � t )
� � f,ia4,TT�)�'~ - - - - �°�t' S S�vwt.-n�t•$�1 , •. :.=�---- � �fiSld- _�� --- M` �'.i
�B� ���.yo a�;�.6- ��. 4l25 ' w• ;e.s. 2 !.S 'a l:� .� .at...�. N . '«
��`�'.:� �p9 � • � A Z � R 4 =. '' ig�� I o �
; o�,, ;, E r- h . .� ..
.ti ,� , a :- � ILoB'- �^ .
� � �CJ. C i ~ � 2 o q� � \�' �j o 2 �`,
w � f
� t � • : X �
ler� ° (4d 7S . �O � \\ \ '� �'.i
��Z ��°%bs;+, =Gi��ea`'x , 1� �` o �a� ;-� ° o � '1 0 . :t
^ �f,' f!L //0/�'iS�r �OiO �yj��r B a VJ O J 5` � 3' J ti � � � I.�.:
„ ♦ ,► � � �.
�� " �h � �M� • � '.�
����� \•`` i .Z�� °�^'� Z!o L'%
o .► :��,�'.t •• r ., i . b � � �`, , �,
(ry�0 7�`iye,�l• � �09•• �� ►•-ts�s 'nq, Z00. ti'L �'
J �° �5 � � `j.•%;`^;''•,1���'�g C •a o ~' :\
L .
=
`15'2 !j�� 2� o P� ` �~ 6�
'• •4.` � \'�
N� J V, H4d L � N•p9 34 W. . `' a$ • ; A��� �° .iI
,� � `r 1 \ \
�• '^ � W , � � � � � �r .� 1 t
� ti q.
' � � ? h�� o N � B � �t � �200 _� `►�� � ''r � \\ \
• a � • � \ �
� Nd 9�3%ii") •m��� � • a I r+ 9 � � � \
i
� z 1 �304.5 ,' � .4 �o �� s6 �4 �`�,\���
235 519•2T20'E A•39 - o . ,�.o
, T q � o V� ---=�0.02 's �v°� � .`� �500� ... r��a 4•�� ^pp �58943 E
.� � _ . PQ Ka9 ii io-c � m �� N-
� ai�0 � r�,, �, � R . 'Tt W N: � o���� ° p -o � T
' SC4�0'11'� �o==° - •e.e . �� • - . `f.
3 • � = J
Easf �'/ v . Q� �ao.." �� 5 a p �
' 154 • -�r5}� 5�5/���7'/7�y- N _�Bo ti`" , ` 589°13'E �SO;� tz�4�p-
N-�:.�' ,,, 3 ,q +l7 S 6"'. � - ---- -- �� 1�9.64 Sd91148' 149.65
:tc1 No•M W � 2 'rW� 89•13'W
^ (�� �. :s:.� z o 9j�o ~ C3 : NTREMBL TT 2• � '° t'r�� �o m 2 W
: Q P °! o�-� �' 1 O� � ... 40?0 �'� S 40/a •eN ��9y6 Q '�-^ M O 2 N
�V�.L�ri. ° \ /j�, �'..r . Q "`106.6? �^��.�2�' f�� i0i.11°� `� 114.40'�/. � o+o Q• N
. �/ ��s�!`�;... 19• ,°fr��s•'j °DI S b!'21'QE o s �, 9`'roct�•. � <•.rS .r g z "' QQ� �"°o_
e°'���i�jlZ9�fYB .��� IO00� ��i �NOIEE-�,-M .5tt•e�^�'��9t�1�i9) N89°i3W IS3.66 �
�r � r,. t� �-4/?3 {Sj � 1120'N . :r � •., t49.64:••4.•, , it0 .io
�� 200 �. N8724'46"N . � � ��� �� � t0e.03 7'R� ,a[B .�
, �os tps � E.� � �o2�'S� �,��iois o 4oiJ �On �
/ 3�5 ..�,.` ^ '..`fh�'�RACE 22� . . o .
�v ��`v s �_ k@� I49.e� NB9°!1� 48��w ►;c.c'� ��;
x W � 15 iso � `'
a
�.. � � �Ns�as Q � „� ' �
er•` �0 ��;N ol � �.�uc. ��o h
"� � ,a„ i 'Z�^ � ° �i o;� � � ;�-----
Q M a,+ � �+ y .�
o � � � I �� "` Io �
• � z .o
. ` j i • ry ,� .N N • +
' f� 4P�0 � r� a � 305.5 �' �'3e ' io � �y0
��"" ,`C •L(�Id• en 1 � � 1 � 39?D
�� " � _ � w�
�1.�O�i. . • ... •
Planning Comnission Minutes - July 11, 1983 page, 2
� I t was moved by Comni ssioner Polachek, seconded by Corr�i ssioner Singer and
carried unanimously to set an informal public hearing date of July 25, 1983
for consideration of the Preliminary Design Plan of PUD #41, Valley Wood.
IV. Informal Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat
APPLICANT: Courey, Schwinn, Kodadek and McRoberts, P.A.
L OCATION: 206 Sunny ridge Lane
REQUEST: Approval of Preliminary Plat of "Tolg Addition"
C hairman Thompson introduced this agenda item and recognized Mr. John Waldron
f rom Courey, Schwinn, Kodadek and McRoberts, P.A., who was present to repre-
__ sent the proponents.
C hairman Thompson asked whether there were questions of staff, and Comnissioner'
P razak asked whether the proposal was the same as originally submitted or
w hether it had been changed in response to staff direction. Assistant Planner
Alda Peikert stated that the proposal was as received with the formal applica-
tion, but that she understood that previous inquiries had been made to the
Engineering Department and that the proposal was drawn to correspond to
E ngineering direction.
C hairman Thompson called on Mr. Waldron to make a presentation for the propo-
nents. Mr. Waldron described the proposed plat and the background for pre-
• p aration af the proposal. Mr. Waldron stated that the proponents originally
p repared a cul-de-sac design and would prefer a cul-de-sac to a through street,
but that the Ci ty Engi neeri ng Department di rected development of a through
s treet connecting Roanoke Circle to Sunnyridge Lane.
Comni ssioner Leppik asked Mr. Waldron whether Roanoke Ci rcle currently ends
with a cul-de-sac considering the half section map which shows an extension
f rom the cul-de-sac to the subject property. Mr. Waldron explained that the
p avement ends with the cul-de-sac but that right of way is reserved for �
possible street extension.
Mr. Bill Webster, 4007 Roanoke Circle, offered a drawing which he had prepared
showing the existing cul-de-sac. Mr. Webster explained that the reserved
right of way is currently maintained as lawn by the two homeowners on each
s i de of the ri ght of way.
Comnissioner Leppik asked whether the cul-d'e-sac right of way would revert to
the ac�joining property awners if the cul-de-sac were abandoned. Ms. Peikert
replied that the cul-de-sac would remain right of way as platted but that it
could be used as lawn in the same manner as the right of way reserved for
s treet extension is currently maintained as lawn.
�
Planning Comnission Minutes - July 11, 1983 � Page 3
• Comnissioner Forster asked the rationale for completion of a loop street
extending Roanoke Circle to Sunnyridge Lane. Ms. Peikert replied that the two
main considerations ar� street maintenance and emergency vehicle access. Ms.
P eikert added that the street extension conforms to plans for a through street
p rovi ded for by means of reservation of ri ght of way at the time of approval
of the plat,to the south of the sub3ect property, Russell 's Wirth Park Addition.
Comnissione�r Forster asked when Russell 's Wirth Park Addition was approved.
M r. Robert Russell, developer of Russell 's Wirth Park Addition, was present
a nd informed the Camnission that his plat was approved in 1972. Mr. Russell
confirmed that a through street to Sunnyridge Lane was contemplated at that
t ime.
Chairman Thompson opened the informal public hearing for public input.
M r. Bill Webster, 4007 Roanoke Circle, stated that the main point is that all
of the neighbors would much prefer a cul-de-sac off of Sunny ridge Lane to a
through street extended from Roanoke Circle. Mr. Webster st�ted that the
through street design would be nwre costly and that it would be a poor choice
aesthetically. Concerning cost, Mr. Webster listed the following points:
1 . Th e expense of removing the existing cul-de-sac at the end of
Roanoke Circle and extending the driveways of the two homeawners
on the cul-de-sac.
� 2. The necessity for relocation of a fire hydrant at a cost of
approximately $2500.
3. Necessity for an eight foot high retaining wall along a distance
of approximately 100 feet due to differencs in grade.
4. Creation of an unmarketable low lot which will be 14 feet lower
than the street.
- 5. The possibility of creating a greater number of lots with a c�l-
de-sac des9gn rather than a through street design.
6. The expense of construction of a street on poor soi ls.
M r. Webster concluded his remarks on expenses with the statement that the
through street design would cost three to four times construction of a cul-de-
sac design. Mr. Webster added that the through street design is aesthetically
inferior due to the steeper grades and due to the removal of trees.
Dr. Matol Lysyj, 4004 Roanoke Circle, stated that he is opposed to the
through street for the following reasons:
1 . Dr. Ly sy� understands that the grade change would require a
c hange in the elevation of the street in front of his house and
that this would put his garage at a different elevation in
relation to the street.
�
Planning Comnission Mir�utes - July 11, 1983 Page 4
• 2. Snowplowing inconvenience is not reason enough to eliminate a
cul-de-sac. Dr. Lysyj states that he pa�ys taxes which support
in part the Engineering Department and road maintenance. Dr.
Lysyj offered his driveway for turnaround space for snowplows �
i f needed.
3. Dr. Lysyj stated that he is frequently awa�y at ni ght and that
his wife feels safer from robbery or intrusion on a cul-de-sac
than on a through street.
.
4. Dr. Ly sy3 stated that the through street would destroy a part
of his property and lower the property value.
Dr. Lysy3 concluded that all the neighbors in the area prefer a cul-de-sac
- design for the proposed development and that he sees no use in having this
n umber of unhappy Golden Yalley citizens.
Mr. James Garfunkel, 200 Sunnyridge Lane, questioned whether the proposed lot
widths meet zoning requirements. It was confirmed that all lots in the pro-
posed subdivision meet zoning requirements for size and width. Mr. Garfunkel
s tated that his concerns include the loss of huge trees unique to the area and
p roblems with drainage in the area.
� M r. Ron Balazs, 4011 Roanoke Circle, stated that his concern is for the visual
aspect of the area which is beautiful. Mr. Balazs questioned the need for a
• loop street.
Mr. Dave Morley, 4006 Roanoke Ci rcle, stated that his background is in archi-
tecture and planning and that Mr. Webster made some excellent points concerning
s oils and elevations. Mr. Morley added the following points in support of a
c ul-de-sac rather than a through street design:
1 . The change in elevation will add to developer and builder problems
a nd possibly to drainage problems. Several neighbors in the area
a 1 rea�y have probl ems wi th water i n thei r basements.
. 2 . The cul-de-sac design woul d increase property values and therefore
p roperty taxes, which would pa�y the increased maintenance expenses.
3 . Ease of street designation or maintenance is not adequate reason
t o insist on a through street design.
Mrs. Daria Lysyj, 4004 Roanoke Circle, stated that the City required a large
size cul-de-sac at the end of existing Roanoke Circle specifically for the
accomnodation of snowplows and that it should be adequate.
M s. Mary Gooderl, 4015 Roanoke Circle, stated that one reason given for the
through street design is the need for two entries for public safety purposes.
On the other hand, it has been noted that there is a higher probability of
robbery where there are two access points.
�
Planning Comnission Minutes - July 11, 1983 Page 5
� Mrs. Betty Pedersen, 4013 Roanoke Circle, stated that the subject property is
visually very steep and that it would clearly be e�ensive to construct a
through street. Mrs. Pedersen stated that it seems a simple solu tion to build
a cul-de-sac.
Mr. Richard Morley, 4006 Roanoke Circle, made the point that there are alrea�jr
many other existing cul-de-sacs in the City at this time. Mr. Morley stated
that those who choose to live on a cul-de-sac do so for the quiet area and
1 ack of traffic.
M r. Ray Pedersen, 4013 Roanoke Circle, stated that the proposed development is
the new enterprise going in and that 3t is the one which must be disrupted.
The current residents are the old enterprise and wish to maintain the area as
i t is.
Chairman Thompson closed the �nformal public hearing.
Comnissioner Forster asked for confirmation that the cost of street construc-_
tion is paid by the developer. Ms. Peikert stated that the expense of street
c onstruction is paid by the developer or assessed to the new property owners
a nd that it is not a cost to the Ci�y.
C hairman Thompson asked the proponent whether cost estimates have been done on
the street construction. Mr. Waldron replied that he assumes estimates have
been made but that he did not have that information.
. C omnissioner Singer stated that with the City of Golden Valley completely
developed, this could be the last cul-de-sac approved. Co mnissioner Singer
recomnended that the proposal be sent back to the developer for preparation of
a new plan with a cul-de-sac design.
Comnissioner Polachek expressed concern over the steep grade of the proposed
through street and stated that the grade would constitute a good basic
planning reason for turning down the proposed through street design.
I t was moved by Comni ssi oner Si nger, seconded by Comni ssi oner Pol achek and
c arried unanimously to continue the informal public hearing to allow the pro-
p onent time to coordinate with the City Engineering Department on preparation
of a preliminary plat design utilizing a cul-de-sac based on the f ollowing
findings:
1. A through street would result in poor land use.
� 2. A through street would ill serve the property to be developed
as well as the surrounding property.
3. The cul-de-sac option is preferable to the through street
option based on both aesthetic and engineering considerations.
�
Planning Comnission Minutes - July 11, 1983 Page 6
� Mr. Waldron asked about timing of a return to the Planning Comnission and
whether it would be necessary for the Planning Conmission to take action to
set a new hearing date before the proposal is heard again.
I t was moved by Comni ssioner Forster, seconded by Cortmi ssi oner Leppik and �
carried unanimously to amend the motion to continue the informal public
hearing until the August 8, 1983 Planning Comnission meeting.
.
APPLICANT: Coto Corporation
L OCATION: 812 Lilac Drive North
EQUEST: Approval of Prelimi nary sign Plan for .
P UD #42, North Lilac Dr' e Addition
C hai rman Thomp so i ntroduced thi s agenda i tem a recognized Mr. Ka�ye
W esterlund, The Bu lders Studio, Inc. , who was resent to represent the propo-
nents.
C hairman Thompson calle , on Assistant Pla er Alda Peikert to expand on the
s taff recommendation. M Peikert revie d the staff recornmendation for con-
tinuance based on parking , d drainage oncerns and answered questions from
C omni ss i oners.
� C omnissioner Leppik questioned� het er the Planning Cortmission has options
o ther than acceptance of the pro� ed reuse of the former Holiday Motor Hotel
facilities short of forcing remo ��of buildings. Chairman Thompson stated
that the Planning Comnission al ays �as the option of der�ying a proposal.
C hairman Thompson called on . Westerl' nd to speak for the proponent. Mr.
W esterlund described the pr posal and th specifically addressed the issues of
p arking and the proposed gional trail. . Westerlund explained that the
p arking located to the b ck of the restaura � on the north side of the site
w ould primarily suppor the banquet facilitie�and would be required on
banquet occasions onl . Mr. Westerlund informe the Comnission that the north
property line of th sub�ect site is 50 feet fro�the centerline of the
railroad track and hat the proposal therefore doe not eliminate the trail
p ossibility. In sponse to Comnissioner questions'�,oncerning proposed resi-
dential condomi um use in conjunction with the offic+�,�condominium use, Mr.
W esterlund exp ined that the residential use is conter�lated in association
with office u e only. A drop down type bed arrangement wpuld be added to
• office unit where desired to provide sleeping accommodati ns for office con-
dominium ers maintaining offices in the Twin Cities but ving their prin-
cipal off ces and residences in another city. �
C omnis oner Prazak asked whether the staff concerns could be ha led as con-
d�iti s of an approval recommendation. Ms. Peikert stated that th drainage
que ion could be handled as a condition requiring preparation of a rainage
p 1 n acceptabl e to the Ci ty Engi neer prior to Ci ty Counci 1 action on e
� P eliminary Design Plan. Ms. Peikert added that although the extent o �
arking deficiencies is unclear due to use by the proponent of incomplet `
square footage figures, it is clear that parking is deficient on all three
� w
P � � Q N a�N . i
�o '
o�'
z
�.
L
m
s
"' „ ,,.
4 i' � •• :.� a
p,�. � � s,..: !r� ;.�• O
� N
�°� . ; •';� s•� � ��•• • ��
a 4. . :.. . N� '�t
h�� ;��•�1 : `: ' � (r
:
k!��f S,.S 5..� � Q
1 c'',,2
� 1 h�y .. ., � t.y .'1� �
.:: , 3 `�i �v. v r,y 1 ��' 3 � p'
. +
.��.,� � _40A! C o� .� � ; ' �
N 4
� �� � m� ^ � -0 t Q :i�j�, v
� ,•'•,•y�`"1 �3 '�� ���� V
������ �0\p `- � ` v1
41
J��,�' Qi \� 0vi Z'4_Ot �°2 vi � o
�,'���� �aPO� (V "�'`'' $ � �ti° �.BO�ng-Residential � ; a`�-
�''� p�,�t� � C?�n oH i��: �_ *B4B.20 � ri
�: • ��"� � y�• �� ��849.20 .�1w99°IZ'�f}"1�;��.61 B41.617 4� �_
�-�,�� .-.�t Q.y� m � , , - 221.98 --=��: � Q i � •
��
oc� a`° ��` ��'` ' � : ���A98 •- � `- _�-
t� ? � y � `�/ h' � .� � e5�.zo ., � s o � ' sas.o 9.00 'L�.843.7r � " ti •»•.
q ? � . � o�h' ,�b�pt �ess.3o N i °' ° •
� 9 �8 5.10 �o�BS1.60 - 844.41 � o
� ��J �� x� � � . yh� / O� � �- -- -� m '�,� � a �v��•
�2�`� Q�a y�y�0`o�` `. m �.o�`.b �cj e 7p r�� �852.50 � $ i ' `� �.i
� / y a� :.:..
ya0 Q � Q. a �C �0�� 1�;�� � � /3�440 d'T. � `. � -e�b�i� _ `' � 4m �
c�• st -1. � �
i,;�.� o Kra. �G���?�,����C�Op ��/ry�"� � �y�B65.� r - ���s /s{ �860.7C ` B5 2..29� � �. m
Y•• `�C�`5C \ �_� `� o ��/o'"ya: i '�S �i968.60 / ��/ . �860.70 l � 1+ -- o
'•. � c �t`a �3` /y0•0� v� . , �974.0 0 85 .20� N
,...,'.••`�.� F� tc o�0�` /� y� ` #��E^ t�79/.�64 �'�9.64 '2¢��OSQ.i1,! 36 al �a' P L
� •,� k�vp, y�� ,��A ��0a• / r4% ha �.`C,86e.2 ae. �874.zo ��' g�4•, , 2 . 65�.99� N W
�lC G // �•�y^'y' 0 �i' �r �c •?4 . Z
�'� Q` V•� 0 ��fiJ ` 864.6tf ` 8 3.44 • . y� ��*� t873.82 t�59.B0 r..�
�;� `�p�` / `/ f ��' `O�� • 8� . � { � �
� O`� a p) � �i 866.66'� � . o � 674.82 � I
oC �` �'�.� f�� �� �a;o gag� � �v ,•�i��u=
ti , / b•�� ��b.. e 'a� �'� ��e 6 8��'32 ' � � ° D E
. i a. ���,�.�af��� �\� �� .i4.1��� ` 8,46..+B�3B ��'j , �'873B-r� �62.90 o m
�!``/o��I � 0. \� .� �Y� .e �?ip � � 0. T{�
h/,�b � "�g�i / 6s Power�e .19"�x �,N C 1 1� �
���e .��` 56 �� � / e�C4 �, �� -- h /�68.80 __ 3cij .� �' .
. bc• klr 3,� � �sr � `� �pow T0�
-` /a i pJ meei.as � a C 6i.16d ?� ``�� S,s �'��o� °1h�2Z ��f�r_ a� � ..
�V �, ,,�3,,{{yo�` �. �oY ,�2 9, � 'r�o s m �" � ` 47 '� W ;., t h E
/ J:j�( `. � fo ` � � i :w.
s.�/-'{Sp �o � � (q�
�0�^`�,-' �/b �to�tp ,Y'� ��` V �y i $bI 0 66 1`,�O ' 86 •96 �3,yf866.60 �= m� _.
� ��o•'�� 0�0���,� y9 m`D '�, 3 0� *o--� � �r 'E--- � . ''i1Wei1 � � - r F.. _ � ''�•
a S 0' 0 �0,�� �•� a O i � `I� 88&74 '� � Bs9.i �J` 866. �1 N �•,, Z Q
r''Q 0y 6' . � ��,� � � � ,i� p 36 c 857.�9'� �� 3 .
to , � �'A��� 0 � �N� a��s� , 2s �.859.94 G �S � 865.66 • •�669 90' M� � � .«�
�� �'���p' @59.36 � �ca,•�41 \ ���_ _.� � +Sr�L'T �869.46 855.99� V1 o'O �.»`.
�.�P\ s�0� 2 °a�i+-, ^s D� 'esa. �`` ��' �s.�6 � ��� ���ot e66.a6 �v. �` � h
0 0 � 8�.,6 ,� � 3 I a
' h�t�, � Z � {�� I 12,800SV.Fr.i� ` � � • Bsq e � !6 2d05 , � .. � �
� � � , O.Ff.l. ��J
tU � S� �"` a� o ; �� .96� $ ��6 �- �..� � �� D a t
~ W � b 86B.Z6 �i � �3 i �
�Q �,c x �- - -r-,c- , � 86 .49 . �o
.,.:'t� c�N �59.46�� r i. � _ � 6'
� "•�,-x CY1 '� ` �;85 .�u � ��oy � .La�
.a�' • ,' W lV�� . � �' �f. •o B67,B9 d�t �
�.:; �n M
��f ` °N 119.00., : o � 3����'
•.?"•.•,^,•• •� . � u �o I ao N ��E�a.Bo`' - - -$-i e;J� e�� O 8Ia9.29��B 9.09 �, � �m 4i W
�
• ''�' '� '• °� � y n�9 � � ,��, �- --as�,ay .-i �vi
� �• x es o ,
�;;i_�' • .!��;••� �'o �� x � � �897.2G IC\�Ca�° �9 � h� 1�� � 866.99 �27.2 � ��
' }}{``` � Q 0 O 8�5.29 869.09
� '� W �N ��B 97 `y�\� � B 7.29 ��
� �:•• �•�_�-_, f►x a 20p�J�5y e\5 o Z ' � � �" 869.f5 � � �i ° �
� C I /2�7�iS FT.7 2�L �B57.1� rB57. �f ` �� 4 +Q�9.49 I �'� ���I
I m � Q� . �y B6B. 5 -riPOQS�B.F�!'{, f i W p�:
' , � � 4 I � �`�35 . i � .ss� Lgrg . . �B7o.as 87.85 � � O v1�,••� n{ �
� �" B51B.07 _._� � ��'" 87437 � u. v� .
33�.�� ' � � �+ � *'857. 6� � �� ., .. ZI' 1 .� er :.;
; n\ � T3� , r. � i 6� i 35'�'1'�-- �F/'a'3.95 � �.h.
W
ff�---�_X�� �' /RON _„ ���¢� �' 863.r0 � 66� B'� 65 `�75.Ib��.7.'9� �.' �676.70 � - h o o��" N�
� BS 67 ; -. - # ----- .
1 �B56.77 .� %'`859.77 3�'.37 �"-=��
� I � ,es�»'' ..�..eE,o.�o �'N.89°08'S1"W, ; � o
`� 63�.T� � '�e6e.ao �Fence partly down o I�`
"South line o�' fi 1��'��
he I�E. � of S.E, / oF ihe S.E.� 'I i•3.: ;,; 2oning-Resid�ntial �I
of Sec. l9 I Zoning-Residsntral : �.- a:.: I ., . ;, ..« . ;
�".,i� '�-: t:' F� f . � +G;' .a. -�; r 7�:.'. %��%
Ir . .%•.:�..% .». :... i... •.� I =•:� �'•� ' ' . � ,
J , N ' , •� I
x;,� :�;� '..t � _�: ��: I , �;;:j;l� ���i•.:i K
. � ;.
. .. .;..} :•g
i+� -~
. �• - - • i i-`7 • -
• .FW�� ���� ���� ��� � �
` 6.2 ...' ' �
..
` W ''t ��•a lV
..c; ��4j ••;' _ �•� ' P
.� 3 � t�'4 � ,,.., ; � 1
��ii. ` �� C7�� r 'r�i 4 � • . • �
��y��' ►L � •C d4 � i' �j i ��� ,
� • � � f11.L O r�N� � � V
�����S �t 1� �� � �
�'� ••� q�� �� -3D- �;��`� �n
y. 4
4• �• /d �O l." O O W O
•�•. � �� 24.0* �2h . i � \
�.���; ��OQ� �� J o Zon r n g-Residenfial � i `�
� .,. � ti
�� i
•,�.�j v�, 1,. h �� � �y �847.8o 848.20 � � 4i
�:' , �<ir �� °p c�m �� '� � .:_ " -N.89°12'24"W.�'sa�.6i, . e4�.ei� � h
a �, � 849.zo .
� � v) �---- • �.r b
' t�Q i � � �� , . 221.98 -- �_r_.� � �
c-� �' � Q' � � , �--- � � � �
hJ�� a� ��1��` " h, ,�y! � 51.2p O��Ba�� � _� 11l3. e �'�'3• �• d,r o
�
o hJ� �t���i �� \ �.��yo'�� /oti�a ,�8ss.��- _ _ 855.�o �es�.,60es2.so s4a.a1-� � ; a `
. / , . o p 1 0
y � ��
c¢�o a'� �� ��� �� � C?o��N�b �.� f'-� - -�-- � � �a'
��,� � Lj� � �Qi � � y'9'0� /�� �,/ ��_ ��6Z.7 __ `�. ` �_ 84G 3!' - � � o� v)
`Q Q• Q �h c0 �0�1 �p� / " N /.�-fS�� � .' •� � 52 . 1 0��
�\_�G• �• . � Q�"00� h' � .�/ l865.8 �` f860.70 ' \� 52.�2�9 , ,�,
, ---- , * '�j_ -►-
(p �' � [��o� �j• � ��. /, : . ��- , �.. � •� k
L�`< i��C.,�(rj��M ah� � � - 68.60 �t�' 1� . �860.70 � � � -� o
� -�;, `�.��� ,,�,s� yq 59' �4.�4 i /�+� � ,. , e z.zo �•
��3 � /�h `f/ � �5 IZ '�� 0�e73.6400-� - ft�'f�. . ,. �'� , I� -a
A� � �l�-r .• . X �' ��--&68.6 �7 64 ��� 2��g7�59' ._. � 52. ;y- � �, u,i
/ �� ���' � OV ' �`.� ;'�66.20 ` �87 .20 `^M 8�4;?4_h-. �_� ` I �Q Z
� ���.�� ���ij0 0`��� �B6a.6 �� \�7 314� � �sti�, �g73.82 / 65 %-► a
` � ��o`p �� . 8 .�4• \ � � (9 4.3Zr�``00 i �• +
/� � � I .
�( �/ �`� � .. � _�___ � \ �,� e y � � c
• �j `� j�1q��`� � �4- ,1'4 d�� ,� ��''�b �he� ,32�0 ..\ t 1 , ` ��-1
\/
�` / at�, �; 6 f' --'L•¢'�gb�.14.F-�! -� • • 6�,�, � 1��J 8 „f'8 8 .� �\862.810 �� �
�.��to��?• �. �c�•� �, � q� � es e� � � p er ole �854�. 9�'� L� =
0� �
1 ��/ �',�0f°��L$fo2'S� 863. 6S, ?.��`,a`- s�;�0 8.80 3,Po er'� o� v
a�' �� � . . •�r � �F �;� m. 4� #•i�- � �w rt
�
'/.06 � G�PJ�m 6 •� .84 B6►.�6J 2�� � ��m ��',:� /' Ce�3,�� --, �, �
o. ' �. � „� � _ S6�•9� '� : 0 ''J _ l4,l2'$ z�•f t• 24.0 -_-__'
�J�'�aq� � y � � 65, �('873. -
,,��co�,����� �ti �� �`� � O� 866666 ` _ � . :�' , � ,�866.6 . t11= C�
a.c� - r � �, • ��''�6 '+� --- , � We�1�� ,���' : � � '�' -- �
• �' � � nl� 'p� ��� �85,8.74 859.16 ' 866.46 O�B6fd.3r'o G: 857.9 � �j� � '�
��y 0� 0tp\ � tj��� �S� � � 859.34 � .� 8 A �1 ""s�-B69,90, �p 5.99 �h Qa
1 � 869.46� ' '
/659.36� �N �� � �41 , yQ0 � : ''` tt`'q �• i � nJ=
� �s. n� � � ,.�, •.�,'_' �-�
I. r
/ 2 �� � � se.� se.sa �s9.i� 1r-� a�i .; ` �--`�J�` • � m �
/20 0 ` � '� `L
o c0 0 •� 8� �' • � •
� � J
� � �
1�- � � � � 858.26 1 '�8 8.96 O 0 BS,g� - - \ �`�
,bW � � I � , ,•�0 0 � �8@7.49 • �a
'•.4 •�'r � � � -- �'p; � i � ��'+6� � ���Q1
.,..,, �oN ` 9.� o �\ �;8�8.�6 � �• N � 9 eb� 9`X . 3� ��-��
: :�:�W N �dl'�t � 859.5o k t�- �� � - /sj0� J�q. .�6 .89� '��°� �
.,. �, �o o � �'�� � J p� , e6s.z9 , 3J.00 � �i 4i
V �o i °CpN I x 858.60 �q� ���B3i56 ' � �866 9^y` �-- J 2 h
\� '�.
x ,.CO'"L �9 6�,� �tO�, �1�?..(b '�. ;.' � ` 1.50 %866.99 O �r�..
� [ � X ���/ �5��� / � 5.29 869.09 �
I N � BSQ.37 ,y�� a�"--��`� � 8 6 ?9� � �+-O
1 � �
W i � , ��J` � ./2�75Q� Q.f�� � � B69.t5 �69.49 1 i'
�'` Q I "� J5 57.15, � �0� `s�6` Op . , ,_ \�t
� i � � (8, 7,60 � � �\ �7r ' � 4i
I( . '}
� 1 x ID�'�57.30 � , }„ . � �G'� . �' �� '"f, , `870.45� 0.85 ; O N c
(� " �� �
� 1 � L./ 868� 668.1 ._ f.37 � u �
� d' � .07 �c� L a.Ip ,i�" r^-- _ _ � �Y
, i cv ioi 5��5 -- --� � $i -1/"873.9b j ' 'y-�"`
� � . � � - - -- . � W
_ ---_1' ��`� ��/4 66�37 � ?- -�s3� R� 1�Q�Ji3.65' , f876-r5� --`'; .�G'I,�y6a� � � v)0`
_ �_ �- �aC'�r
-es 6�� -- - -- ,4,. 304.37 , - ---- - •-�.�
��856.77 / -'" ., 859.77 � � Z
�$57.J7 r� ��N.89�Q8 'S�pw i � O
1 �`B5� � � "„eb°.90 '�-e6s.so . I �Fence partly down o I�
B6� �� I ,,;� zoning-Resi�en+ia: r
outh line a� the NE, y4 af S.E. % o�' the S.E.% z,,.._ : ; • f "I
f Sec. 19 � Zon�na -Resident►a! _ . "•�� ( • • '% �':: "s" :..s
.�.
' ' -r:�^� � ►•� � • �
•�, : ►
. t ` �.r,+`c`. ,..' � ;
� � W '' • �,� ''� '� i
� � i � .�a .
. r ► !
�Z <e`!`` •} ���G. t� ♦��� i ie: • �
�. � �! ti! �. � • � �+,�{4 � � �
.;.3. 4 : • 'i�,��"'� ...{ alg,�,,'. >"��e : s '
�.f��+. ' jw Sr.��.^'" ' ,C �� • i� i i :••' ' E
. . ? ' 6j ` � �`% "'� �
e ! ,�' $`$ . . '�1:�� ►i
e �������� �� � � � � . ` � � � _ . .
...e . ��.�. �� �.:_�� ..:� ��..� :
•, • ; ��. . •_aa� ; : . �:;: E
o ,
� •'`` ��.` ;du+:: • •^•.'�,�� s t�:�n•; i
a „��L' _ . '�+1i-• :r,1 • f
s�•��`��' .>J►a� '��J' ; .,ti��. !�ri r�r.^.lP'SC.4'^Si.�3��i��1°I�j • .
T i� i � �f,i��' ���i�'i/ � rA,
�.�`•r` � iN• s.= s sE�.ZC • '
� �.� Y �� �� ;' t?: r.+.� �0 . 3 ,. .. • �' �r
• � ��� � `�y, ��.6: �a�.�:-
,� �,3� ti ; �,. ��;, � .��.c�;,zo , . 9�'#S s �.` ,�. : s
.���� � � ,�, .•',�«' ; °•''�". ��10�� __.::,ks..;;;,,e r� °
^ `(: '�,'is ,%. :* ' ;. �� . .. '"
��.,, •C, Rs�. s ��: �� � ..... _ � ,�, , � `B49 .
�^?�� r�J; �vr ••X 4� ,' ;` .•'i� i 'ii.=� �..�T`` .dbe�u3�'%3�$ ' '��9��� `°�'•�.. 4
7+.se., �
,. ��, wL ��,�; . �i . ;�,��'�J'���� �•�f353.:��; ,�; �'sri.�.t� �S:if..�'i� �F4�.�2;.��.. •} �
^ ,' + �?/ "`.. ..(` ` ��y� !�;��'�t'Al' � ' ° $1 :"�s4,�f1 � �• 1 , ��
4•`. > ,"� �` e,9'. J '�....i, � �SS e, 7<� v.1tl ...... �8 ,�, e °� ; i
'. :i M � •„a` � .��!:.y�.�de q,� � � .. ...� ...�4.i%. ....��-.+.-.::y..��« ,i,�'f,':•.'.f�'i:..s:d ��`; t �"`�
% va • ,/ � t
,;;`'� (�, rv; : �,`�., °FY,',.� �y, �IL .�.K.: 1 ��� '"� .f......�•.d�.3 4' � � ' 8 ��"w
M° • C.!• ��y ;�A�gs�` 'a . !''�''f �A .f""d ...,..�........°'� i , . �'• t ��py���yy/:y p •��r,�
�, •V, .�n• /A���i io` �y..• i;. •..�£ `p'�'i! GT�sF� .� . .[iL"1Jvr:� . '`.. „�' 'z'�id2� �'M«�
��'1. �y .,E' 7y� +� ��Cj,�i ' i''!,' r� ' .• , ' ..�,��.... ,� � ' :.�'w�.an.�� e'�'8
. a `� t .` .` , .� 'F / "'"n.. `: .9 �
y. ♦ /� ! ,��� !.�'f n y .�i� � � � 's . P
.!•.' � ��.. ,, •.`r �' yw"°y � �� ,�j,!'' 'R• . `'�Oi�. �.. '�. .
,� •� �.' ��t�,�,^ t�'f,f ��E�`�✓ ,e„ ,���.�� R�s`. � 7 ,t4,4�1 k ..\ �' `.�.,��'� •
k,° , `.,t'=.z� �.. `�'' �:� �4'i �y� L a• • . �� ,�!'�3�.x:�ClQ•_. e�,'�, �t •. ..�z
� ,���''� � �1 :d� '�'ii .�'!d4 f � ♦
p^ • �. .�y �"a � � aS .S...�✓�:l.i'i °� � ro
�.... , �,J�,,.�•%'�Q . .. � ,��. ��s�'J�.��9 , .�'r,�. �. � ..
� ��:.. :�o: �` �� �F ' ` '�kr.�:.ln � ..M'. .. F+�,:yy '"6`?� - ' � ' � � �
. ' t.. ��..< • � �'�- ' '�..'s r ,�^ L'Y, o�t •?qt'•..r, .. •.
'� � �, f�.-' � a�� �: .�s3•., q�».. �• \. y��`�.�v� +'' °pa;to+;;�,. 4i�n,�,y st�'7�.�'',•:�� .f'i5, x�..:
'�y �yoy�s, ;t
�,��`�pt .'�1 sti•,.f��a�• 'iJ �" � �F�'..,y .�i �. �� '1',�, '.[�y- �.A���,�.'�' � � ' .
���T7� . �.�� �� i�.��'``` � •�.,�'��'�.p'�g�,•���% ���. 'Y�`��.�C V��+`�'� ��� , . �
�. .�,� �����:� . '�,` .. _ .�,""'� •i,� �s,�F'� �YT'Y°`�C� Y.� s. .
.'� �, '��!1��,< .,9 1 ,;� �,...y4..` �c,'�i�f _�s..=�yj ' /� � p '!^ .�t
' `y I. '�_"' ~'! V> !Y' "w. �'g ".+f : . �. �` .J�4b�.9,��f�.. T�O� •���~.� J t! � J-7 `�tiw,tAV p�J
' � i.�'��.i '�f0 l •�l�� ' • 6d'• ��`.`�: ^�'� ' '/>�•��q,'A'J-'�� K.�`Y �.F `ir . .';. • ` `w.
_�� ': ,'�.. .- ,. . -Y.x' "o` . 'r ~ � • 9'��
:�,?'?�''�.',5n' �' ,Y�" .,�.. '. .`N... ° ,'y �4,r'. "' '�� `:�[dr'C� .+". '�P' i:?�� ✓SSi. � 3,�
i �^ ,r_,. �y,� ., s.,.�.. .�`. `` '� ikfht
/59. �" , �: `�'.. ''� r' .�2 ..�� '"'r . >1-� g t � �.�� n •
:,, ' • . n�•.:. -t;i:9�"�. �!:i..�.+�i �-.. ,'.. •c, w.. • Cr�:`v � '�'�• �",4 �'�.�
� !""'�' ,�ge:.`4t' :��0'.•�� 8('�,7 1$'�- .°'.M.. 'w.� �.'+ �� ,�Y n,,,� � '"--�...,.,,,.�O6'r or� C�tS'?
:'^c /;. . .. � Y' �� O '� S>f5%,e Kz. '�" Z'�'� FY'-• •�� L w'�, ° �� f"".�
c�` E.`)' '��„' .�:, � ,.".;�7 ••-... �
�� ,�". 'i`'� <%.,'A� c v�"y,,,,'�„ � ��,.i.•�.'�, �y :Z D a� it �rA 9 ...
�;.. � �cti• . '� ....l�j i&•� ��o�••� L°P.4 • ........
. ,:. .�6;.r�� � � � � , �^,+*c'<'° , 'i%'�.r»fyz� �'?':3.2 ; •. � .f,t .
�::.
�j. � `'�;w:;:: ,,.,. ��t. ' f� '�. A��;,f.�:` `�Ss.M' B63 ! �[����p' . r �-�F�:.i; � :��f��� as p
���wNy�i\� �n• �e�trF; •� f."� w t1 � �i �t ';S i.y�..'. .�, 'LT7�L���j 'C��•.. l, n S�'° C +�.
, .�r, .�.��' .�'o'��f '�•.,��,..�x :�?f:C:k .�r'.:iS'3.SE � �ti�,y.�-�..�;,.^..�;/ � :o£'ot'✓'^ `� �L��^,:� ,•�, �� �
• J.`yr,. .• , w�, J �w{.v'.���� : f�.... K ` D��S � Y� � 9�5�'., �.'�S ;R� ''��, +�+.jp�('��D��t:�U: �� ���/@ 4 �
•. � �� "�X 4�:.� � • 7C 1. � „4•:]�'�i^�d'1"� y. �3; � .�'"a� ,�!�i�p,�,�. t'�t�?�/!•r'!.• °d ��
�.q, .�'�,:�.A+.i.:�/��. �� < b `S�o, � '7�� � � �IF.'��'S,:3�^lzJa��'�. ; � ��� �� �
�`. �� � � �^ >�•� ' �i :.: ��,. ��.. � �� • � . �u � � �Z
q'a . � �a., , � ' { `'3"r•,, ����'�,y,� . � f.
�'f� „ : �t�.• ,'a�.. �^�iC �' ��""...�w tt• °i��•'t: ��;: �/f°'^."'�M...... ,w,,�,.�::.: � �
{" � : � �: .��?�� ,�: �� i� �.,. a ��.O�i�. �j . ":� �.;,, £:.
... +�.. �' . �;g, ; 3e� �,� � :i ` `��.i�,�°.t. � -�64�'•
. —�.�,
;~, c � A °�, .�S?.��%� t.;°x;y.tj,r�,•. �. �n� �r�� �`':a� . ...� - Ar
�' `° u ��� �3 � 'i'::
<:�� .�y... ,p„ . �..... .�i _.�'.......,,f---�-�•• �•^, f:�;:"��.... � `•�
•,YM1�. .�� :.. _ �,� 862 � �� ���" s t�, ;:�;�':�� � �-
.,«�, • N'��3 �.. .:.�F•,, �,� ,�rq • . - •- . � '�:.•A. .�..+�:
i°� 3�..'t""'"""•i��6� �: �.. �t �'1.3 �' p�y..�J• � �, !Y�ob �e3'iu�-�.�.>J�1 i 63`C} «.''�.
poi s�°~, �i ~"•t ���° . °"�.��..�5' S� � `�...� avr. ,/' �' ��L3'y�`• �a.��e Xf�+�if�' ,+YY.^.��;� ' a�t��Si
� ` � �,,; � �'� �"3 � .. �.r�.E3�: s�� �`�a,�''.!'����r��� � i �ia .a.`.r � .x� 'Q�. E ��� 1 '�
t {•.Y� t �e .y. ,u 1.4 tt� �„� ,�`„�.y.o ` � .�W� � � �
� � •-,� .�� ti : tr yr, A'` . �;i+ • , y .:lo.'`,�;3 �: � `- ;,t
t � .. ..m' i5 � .�;
� � V� a .��s, d�r� ' .�. 6• _...i�-~"..--P'� 't ��%", £�.'��,�,z��� � �� „�'
�" �` � ' ' ��o�.���xxx� ,�,�- �,
~"' .. � ,� f B .i` n��.Q V�� ��`�'�' ���, ..�, �/� f���°:.a �, w,&i ��
�.,�� ' S�Y�'t' .�'' �$�.��� '+� �(�o ti �° s �� , ,tB�"r,�,�r�+ ! a,,."
� , ,�a-�,. ; .;' � •'.13�'✓7 b.^. �` s 1��`+ .;, � E �:
�� �.,�, �,y x.�,,lel '�� .v •.'�" • ;' •,��t.i�� t �-
�4 # a, —� f i-' '�' �''E � '� t 8%'S•°'sw� t C�
• � f f� .'^a&,.��� •°>s�s..�rA"A: a.C�y,Y,c_ �a-x 7^ � R ie
. �� . i� �� — . ���_�.o_..."°• �� lg �. � 3
.. ..
;^ � . ' � � ' � •.. ' � . �t ��• �� � .
. „���(�,± , . � tT �p�q,p� • ... � . ..._ �!
�• .. '"�.',�..o . w"'......�... t � d B��r �,S��Yy:y '�`� '�'Yr iG• ..�' ' r `�,J,f�`i
••• •• -• '.�r... �r.e� :"'�°;L.°" ✓.�,"'"'""'�"� �R � �� .��,. ¢S .i
....i_...••••V�.f,�`��:.. 8s6.77 '".e:... 8.59 rz�a 77y :. �`°�� ' . 6.S ,... „a........... f,�`�-_.
A.. `���,,.:? ...� ..� � �: tl.�l.' a� <0�`�'�8��i�����; ; ' es
i:�r�„"•'. �$6%.F' � � •�fc6..� � ;..s'g,i:(:� �'to!'�iy 1��1b�t� ���
;�,.,;�•� :;.,A .�.�, �,�.::. .� c�r 5.�:, s� � �:.• � : t.;.� � „ Zar.s�g-�'�.:���,��f;�:' ��
r �� sa. $�'s� .� , . �
1'�+"S' J�:i:. � � �v.�`lf6,,� ""?�`�sC�£4:'�'C.�•' � �: 1 'A. ... , :.*';+i :..� rv• �..: .
, _ _ . � _ Zs_ �•. � _ . +t•a ! ! . i .
_ �C 2� ��3
� �
August 18. 1982
T0: � Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM:� Sgt. James Clark
SUBJECT: Joint City Council - Planning Commission '
As you are aware, on 8/17/82, phil Mathiowetz and I represented the Public
Safety Department at the City Council/Planning Commission meeting. We were
asked to address the issue of dead end through streets and cul-de-sacs,
specifically their impact on our service to the community.
Speaking on behalf of the Police Division, I pointed out that our number one
priority in serving the community is life safety. Second in priority is pro-
tection of property. The addition of any future cul-de-sacs and the failure
to connect neighborhoods by through streets, would have a serious affect on
Public Safety response to emergency calls including medical emergencies. The
added time needed to drive around one neighborhood to respond to another
neighborhood can mean the difference between saving someone's life and not.
� A condition already exists in our city where streets dead end and then begin
in another neighborhood. This creates additional confusion when rFSponding
to emergency calls.
The Public Safety Department would recommend that the city attempt to con�ect
through streets and eliminate cul-de-sacs in future development. This opinion
is based on priority concerns for life safety and our ability to provide the
quickest emergency service to our community. Protection of property can be
influenced by the construction of cul-de-sacs. Cul-de-sacs lend themselves
as a crime prevention tool when dealing with burglary and theft prevention.
However, life safety signif icantly outweighs any gain that we may make in the
area of crime prevention. We are prepared to explore alternative methods of
crime prevention.
Feel free to contact us if we can be of further help with this concern.
. �
• T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISStON DATE: AUGUST 3, 1983
FROM: MIKE MILLER, PLANNING AND REDEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE
Attached you will find copies of proposed amendments to the revised City
Zoning•Ordinance for your review. These proposed amendments include
items left out previously as well as items that have since shown their need
in our ordinance.
Adoption of these amendments by the City Council will complete the reviston
of the City Zoning Ordinance. Following adoption of these amendments,
the City will print the revised zoning ordinance in book form along with
an official City Zoning Map. �
MHM:kjm
�
•
ZONING CODE
OF THE
i CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Chapters Title
1 • Zoning Code and Districts
2• Open Development Zoning District
' 3A. Residential Zoning District
3g• Two-Family R-2 Zoning District
4. Multiple Dwelling Zoning District
5• Commercial Zoning District
6• Light Industrial Zoning District
7. Industrial Zoning District
8• Radio Zoning District
9• Railroad Zoning District
• 10. Business and Professional Office Zoning District
11 . Institutional Zoning District
12. Zoning Code Definitions �
13. � Off Street Parking Requirements and Regulations
14. Administration Under Zoning Code
15. Planned Unit Development
16. Flood Plain Management and Zoning District
17• Moratorium on Development in Valley Square Area
18• Moratorium on Development in Trunk Highway #12 Area
19• Terminal Warehouse Zoning District
20. Conditional Uses
•
CHAPTER ONE; ZONING CODE AND DISTRICTS
• SECTION 1 .01 . Purposes. It is the purpose of this ordi.nance to regulate: land
use within the City of Golden Valley, includi:ng location, size, use and hei.ght
of buildings, the arrangement of buildings on lots and the density of population
within the City, and for the purpose of promoting the helath, safety, order,
convenience and general welfare for all citizens of the Community.
SECTION 1 .02. Zoning Districts. For the purpose of thts Zoning Code, the City
of Golden Valley is divided into the Zoning DiStricts named in this Section:
Open Development
Residential
Two-Family R-2 Residential
Multiple Dwelling
Commercial
� Light Industrial
Industrial
Radio
Railroad
Business and Professional Office
Institutional
Terminal Warehouse
The districts and their boundaries are hereby established. No building,
premises, or land use shall be erected, established, or used for any purpose that
• does not comply with all applicable regulations of the district in which such
building, premises, or land use, is located.
SECTION 1 .025. Official Zoning Ma .
(a) The Official Zoning Map together with all explanatory matter thereon is
adopted hereby by reference and decla.red to be a part of the Zoning Code.
The Officiat Zoning Map shall show the division of the Ci:ty i:nto zoning
districts� and shall be identified 6y the signature of the Mayor, attested
to by the City Clerk and bear the seal of the City under th.e words: '�This
is to certify that this is the Official Zoning Map referred to in Section
1 .025 of the Zoning Code of t�e City of Golden Valley", together with the
date of adoption of this ordinance.
(b) If changes are made in district boundaries or other matter portrayed
on the Official Zoning Map, such changes shall be inscribed on the Official
Zoning Map promptly after the amendment has been approved (or the permit
has been issued) by the C1ty Council together with an entry on the Official
Zoning Map reflecting the number and date of enactment of the amending
ordinance or resolution which effected the change.
{c) Any unauthorized change of the Official Zoning Map of whatever kind by a
person or persons shalt be considered a violation of the Golden Valley
City Code �and punishable as a misdemeanor.
i
Section 1 .025 (cont)
• (d) Whenever any street, a]ley or other public way is vacated by official
action of the City Council , the zoning districts adjoining each side of
such street, alley or public way shall be automatically extended to the
center of such vacation and all area included in the vacation shall then
and heretofore be subject to all appropriate regulations of the extended
districts; provided, hawever, that if 1n the Judgement of the City Attorney
the vacated street, altey, or public way does not become property of the
adjoining landowners, then such automatic extension does not take place.
SECTION 1 .03• Lot of Record. In alt. of the zoning districts, every building
hereafter erected and structu.rally altered shall be located on a separate lot
or p3rcel of record, and in no case shall there be more than one (1) principal
building (as defined in Chapter 12 of the City Zoning Code) on any one such
lot or parcel . In case of doubt or in any question of interpretation, the matter
shall be referred to the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals.
�
�
� �
� GENERAL ZONING ORDINANCE REVISIONS
REVISE SECTIONS 3A.01 , 36.01 , 4.01 , 6.01 , 7.01 , 8.01 , 9.01 , 10.01 , and
19.01 , AT THE BEGINNING OF ZONING DIST�ICT CHAPTERS TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
(Note: This section number is used in Ordinances rezoning tracts of land
to this Zoning District. As to any specific tract or district reference
is made to the 1955 Uillage Code and subsequent rezoning ordinances as they
appear in the City Ordinance Book.)
•
.
CHAPTER 2: OPEN DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS
• Revlse Section 2.04. Conditional Uses. paragraph 2. to read as foll�rs:
2. Horticultural (an/or agricultural) private (Noncommercial) nurseries and
greenhouses.
SECTION 2.05• Yard Requirements. In the case of buildings abutting a Residential
or R-2 Residential Zoning District, side and rear yard setbacks shall not be
less than 50 feet in width or depth, of which at least 25 feet adjacent to the
property line shall be landscaped, planted, and maintained as a buffer zone.
in the case of buildtngs abutting a Zoning District other than Residential or
R-2 Residential , side and rear yards shall not be less than 30 feet in width
and depth, of which at least 15 feet adjacent to the property line shall be -
landscaped, planted, and maintained as a buffer zone.
SECTION 2.06. Front Yards. No building in the Open Development Zoning District
Shall be located less than 35 feet from the property line along an abutting
public street. All portions of a parcel of land abutting a public street shall
be regarded as front yards.
� SECTION 2.08. Lot Covera e. No building or structure, or group thereof shall
occupy more than Twenty-five (25 ) percent of the total land area of any lot
or parcel of land in an Open Development Zoning District.
�
CHAPTER 3A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT
•
SECTIQN 3A. 02. Uses Permitted.
8. Home day care for not more than ten (10) children including the family'�s
awn children (in accordance with M.S. 245.812�..
SECTION 3A. 11 . '
2. Up to six persons shall be permitted to occupy a group home provided,
. however, that a greater number may be permitted by majority vote of the
- City Council so long as said greater number does not exceed the number
� ailowed under the standards and regulations of the Minnesota Department of
Welfare and that the Group Home continues to be operated in accordance
with said standards and no such greater �umber than six shall be permitted,
except upon;
•
a
�
�CHAPTER 5: COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT
� SECTION 5.02 Permitted Uses.
' 29• Tanning Parlors. •
30. Theaters.
a a
31 • Trade or industrial tr.aining schools, both public o.r private.
32• General retail services and/or sales not otherwise listed as a Conditional
Use fn Section 5.03 of this Ordinance. °
SECTION 5.03. Conditional Uses.
1 . Animal hospitals, veterinary clinics, and/or pet grooming facilities.
2. Auto repair shops, including tire and auto accessory repair and installation.
3. Car wash.
4. Convenience food stores.
11 . Pool Hal )s.
12. Class II restaurants (drive-in, fast food, etc.) .
� 13. Sales, or show rooms (auto, machinery, boats, etc.) .
14. Unattended business operations, such as vending machines, coin or token
operated machines and equipment, and other similar uses.
15• Vfdeo Game Arcades.
SECTION 5.07. Lot Coverage.. No Iwi:lding or structurea or group th.s-renf�
shall occupy more than Fifty (50� percent of the. total land area of any lot
or parcel in a Commerci:al Zoning Dsitri�ct.
SECTION 5.08. Height Restrictions. No building or structure, other than water
tanks, water towers, and lighting fixtures, shall be erected to exceed a height
of three (3) stories in the Commercial Zoning District, unless a Conditional Use
Permit has been granted by the City Council for a larger structure. Al1
necessary mechanical equipment and elevator penthouses will not be included in
computation of building height.
�
CHAPTER 6: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT
�
SEC�IdN 6:07. Yard Requirements.
3. . . .
C. in the case of premises adjoining a Commercial , Light Industrial ,
Industrial , Radio or Railroad Zoning District, required side and rear
yard setbacks shall be not less than 20 feet in depth.
SECTION 6.09. Building Height. No building or structure, other than water
tanks,water towers and lighting fixtures, shall be erected to exceed a height of forty-five
(45) feet in the Light Industrial Zoning District. All mechanical equipment
and elevator penthouses will not be included in computation of building
height.
� SECTION 6. 10. Lot Covera e. No buildin or structure or
9 g , group thereof,
shall occupy more than Fifty (50) percent of the total land area of any lot
or parcel in a Light Industrial Zoning District.
�
CHAPTER 7: INDUSTRIAL ZON[NG DISTRICT .
� SECTIQN 7.04. Building Height. No buflding or structure, other than water tanks,
water towers and lighting fixtures, shall be erected to exceed a height of
forty-five (45) feet in the industrial Zoning District. All necessary mechanical
equipment and elevator penthouses will not be included in computation of building
height.
SECTIDN 7.09. Lot Coverage. No building or strucfure, or group thereof,
shall occupy more than Fifty (50) percent of the total land area of any lot
or parcel in an Industrial Zoning District.
�
�
CHAPTER 10: BuSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT
�
CHANGE SECTION 10.03, PARKING REQUIREMENTS TO READ AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION 10.03. Parking Requirements. All land uses and structures permitted
under this zoning district shall provide off-street parking at the ratio of
one (1) parking space for every 250 square feet of gross floor area.
�
. �
CHAPTER ll : INSTITUTIONAL ZONING DISTRICT
� SECTION 11 .04. Height. No building or structure other than water tanks, water
tank towers and lighting fixtures, shall be erected to exceed three (3) stories
in height in the institutional Zoning District. Church spires, belfries, chimneys
and architectural finials may be permitted to exceed the maximum provtsions of
this Section when .erected in accordance with the Ordinance of the City of Golden
Valley.
CHANGE SECTION 11 .07. YARD REQUIREMENTS. OF THE INSTITUTIONAL zONING DISTRICT �
TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 11 .07. Yard Requirements. Side and rear yards in the Institutional
Zoning District shall not be less than 50 feet in width and depth, of which
at least 25 feet adjacent to the property line shall be landscaped and maintained
as a buffer zone.
•
�
CHAPTER 12. ZONING CODE DEFINITIONS
•
DAY CARE - GROUP NURSERY: A service provided to the public in which more than
ten 10 children of school or pre-school age are cared for during established
business hours. No overnight facilities are provided. The children are delivered
and removed daily.
Add after VETERINARY CLINIC and before ZONING ADMINISTRATOR on last page:
VIDEO" GAME ARCAUE: Any premises, building, or structure containing more than
eight (8) video games for use by the general public, customers, patrons, or
employees of such premises, building, or structure.
.
•
CHAPTER 20: CONDITIONAL USES
�
.
ADD THE FOLLOWING NEW SUBSECTION TO CHAPTER 20 CONDITIONAL USES,
SECTION 20.03. PROCEDURE:
0. The City Council shall have the right to revoke, or suspend, any Conditional
iUse permft whenever the terms or conditions of such permit have been violated
or broken. All such action by the City Council to revoke, or suspend, a
Conditional Use Permit shall be by means of a two-thirds affirmative vote.
�