04-12-82 PC Agenda GOLDE�J VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 12, 1q82
(Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road)
� 7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
I . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 11ARCH 22, 1982
II . SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - P.U.D. #35, BUSCH SITE
OFFICE WAREHOUSE
APPLICANT: Kraus-Anderson Realty Company
LOCATION: Northeast Quadrant of the intersection
of lOth Avenue North and Boone Avenue North
REQUEST: Approval of General Plan of Development
without Concept Plan Approval for P.U.D. #35
III . CONSIDERATION OF P.U.D. #34, GOLDEPJ VALLEY LUTHERAP� COLLEGE
APPLICANT: Golden Valley Lutheran College
,
� LOCATION: 6125 Olson Memorial Highway
REQUEST: Approval of General Plan of Development
without Concept Plan Approval for P.U.D. #34
1 V. I NFORP�AL PUBL I C HEAR I NG - REZOPJ I NG
APpLICANT: 6681 Group Partnership
LOCATION: 6681 Country Club Drive
REQUEST: Change Zoning from Institutional (i -3) to '
Business and Professional Offices
V. COPJS I DERAT I ON OF PROPOS ED REV I S I O�dS TO COPIMERC I AL ZOtJ I NG D I STR I CT
SECTION OF ZONING ORDINAPJCE
UI . REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING - APRIL 6, 1982
•
�
•
Minutes of the Golden Valley
Planning Commission
March 22, 1982
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council
Chambers of the Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN.
Chairman Thompson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
. Those present were Commissioners Forster, Leppik, Prazak and Thompson.
Commissioner Polachek was not present at the beginning of the meeting.
Commissioners Eastes and Singer were absent.
Also present were Mike Miller, Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator, and
Alda Peikert, Assistant Planner. �
I. Annual Election of Officers
Chairman Thompson deferred the annual election of Planning Commission offi-
cers until later in the meeting due to the fact that he expected Commissioner
Polachek to arrive late.
, II. Approval of Minutes - March 8, 1982
It was moved by Commissioner Leppik, seconded by Commissioner Forster and
carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the March 8, 1982 Planning
Commission meeting as recorded.
III. Reschedule Informal Public Hearing for P.U.D. #35,
Busc ite Of �ce Ware ouse
APPLICANT: Kraus-Anderson Realty Company
LOCATION: Northeast Quadrant of Intersection of lOth
Avenue North and Boone Avenue North
REQUEST: Approval of General Plan of Development
without Concept Plan Approval
Chairman Thompson introduced this agenda item and requested a recommen-
dation from Planning and Redevelopment Director Mike Miller as to a new
date for the informal public hearing. Mr. Miller recommended that the
Planning Commission defer until the next meeting on April 12, 1982 the
setting of an informal public hearing date. Mr. Miller reported that he
did not yet have new plans for distribution to the Planning Commissioners
but shauld receive new plans by the next meeting.
� Chairman Thompson requested that the setting of a new informal public
hearing date for consideration of the General Plan of Development for PUD
#35, Busch Office Warehouse, be placed on the agenda of the next meeting.
� °lanning Commission Minutes of March 22, 1982 Page 2
4 IV. Informal Public Hearing - P.U.D. #34,
o en a ey ut eran o ege
APPLICANT: Golden Valley Lutheran College
LOCATION: 6125 Olson Memorial Highway (T.H. #55)
REQUEST: Approval of General Plan of Development
without Concept Plan Approval ,
Chairman Thompson introduced this agenda item, and the proponents, Dr. Bernt
C. Opsal , President of Golden Valley Lutheran College, and Mr. Jim Husnik,
Architect with Hammel Green and Abrahamson, Inc. , introduced themselves to
the Planning Commission.
Assistant Planner Alda Peikert distributed to Planning Commissioners a list
of variances incorporated into the General Plan of Development for PUD #34,
Golden Valley Lutheran College. Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator
Mike Miller informed Planning Commissioners that staff would be providing
lists of variances involved in all PUD applications in order to fully
i nform Cormni ssioners of vari ances requested with PUD approval s.
Commissioner Forster asked a question concerning treatment of a continually
evolving PUD such as PUD #34, Golden Valley Lutheran College. Mr. Miller
verified that the College as an institution is constantly evolving and
explained that future additions or changes would be treated as amendments
� to PUD #34, Golden Valley Lutheran College.
Commissioner Leppik asked how far into the future the Commission could
reasonabl� expect the proponents to project their PUD plans and whether the
cost of preparing a complete plan for future improvements would be prohibi-
tive. Commissioner Leppik stated that she would like assurance that the
College is making provision for future needs in drawing up plans for
current improvements. Mr. Miller agreed that he would like to see a plan
for future development in general but cautioned that the Planning
Commission would have to deal with such a plan as something which could
change drastically. Mr. Miller suggested that planning for future improve-
ments could be required as part of the City Council approval and made the
point that such planning would be beneficial to both the City and the
College.
In response to questions from Commissioners, Ms. Peikert pointed out loca-
tions of requested variances from yard requirements and staff discussed the
purpose of platting in conjunction with PUD approval . Chairman Thompson
recognized the proponents, Dr. Opsal and Mr. Husnik, and offered them the
opportunity to present their proposal . Mr. Husnik stated that he wished to
clarify for Commissioners comments about future development possibilities
on the College campus and that the College does not at this time have
existing plans for future additions. Mr. Husnik also explained the
rationale for placement of proposed lot lines requiring setback variances,
which lot lines he said were located to accomodate existing buildings and
� to preserve existing trees.
Planning Commission Minutes of March 22, 1982 Page 3
,i Commissioner Leppik asked the proponents whether they had given con-
, sideraton to space for recreational needs. Dr. Opsal replied that the
College currently has a gymnasium within the Classroom Building and is
thinking about construction of a new gymnasium in the northeast corner of
the campus. Other future improvements which have been considered include
academic and science additions to the Classroom Building and cons�ruction
of a chapel south of the east end of the Classroom Building. Dr. Opsal
confirmed that the College intends to remain a two year school and expects
future size to be 700 to 800 students.
Commissioner Prazak asked what impact the increased enrollment would have
on College staff. Dr. Opsal explained that the College retains certain
staff in order to offer a basic curriculum and that a 30 percent increase
in the student body could be accommodated without a proportionate staff
increase.
Commissioner Forster asked when the College expects to experience the pro-
posed 30 percent increase in enrollment. Dr. Opsal replied that the
increase would take place in the fall of 1982 or the fall of 1983.
Commissioner Forster asked whether a 30 percent growth rate was typical of
junior colleges. Dr. Opsal replied that a 30 percent increase in
enrollment would be high for a larger junior college, but that starting
with the relatively small student body at Golden Valley Lutheran College,
30 percent does not constitute an unusual increase.
� Commissioner Polachek arrived at the meeting.
Chairman Thompson opened the informal public hearing for public input.
Mrs. Lois Lee, 250 Paisley Lane, stated objections to the proximity of the
new dormitory and proposed connecting road to the back yard of her home.
Mrs. Lee stated that she and her husband have lived at their present loca-
tion for 20 years and that they were attracted to the area originally
because of the large lots and surrounding trees. Mrs. Lee expressed con-
cern over removal for the road construction of trees which presently form a
buffer between their property and the College and over noise generated by
the young people on campus and their stereos. Mrs. Lee added that she and
her husband have constructed a swimming pool in their back yard and are
concerned over loss of back yard privacy and lowering of property values.
Mr. Walter Lee, 250 Paisley Lane, said he believed that his wife also spoke
for their neighbors, the Hetlands and the Flannagans, in expressing her
concerns.
Dr. Opsal informed Commissioners and residents that the proposed connecting
road, required by the City Fire Marshal , would be 33 feet from the College
property line. In response to a question from Commissioner Prazak, Dr.
Opsal stated that the current buffer area between the property line and
buildings is approximately 90 feet.
�
Planning Commission Minutes of March 22, 1982 Page 4
• Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator Mike Miller suggested that the road
could be blocked with break away chain for emergency vehicle use only to
eliminate daily traffic on the road.
Dr. Kenneth Valentas, 401 Edgewood Avenue North, observed that there is
presently such a chain on the access road into the College from Edgewood
Avenue and stated that he would favor use of such a chain on the proposed
connecting road.
Mrs. Lois Lee, 250 Paisley Lane, suggested that the College utilize vacant
land in the northern area of the College property for expansion rather than
ruining the residential neighborhood to the south.
Chairman Thompson suggested the planting of evergreens as a buffer from
residential property.
Mr. Husnik explained that topography and poor soils preclude use of pro-
perty to the north. Mr. Husnik expressed willingness to consider use of
evergreen plantings as a buffer and also noted that the proposed new dor-
mitory is oriented with the narrow end toward the residential neighborhood
to minimize exposure and to preserve existing trees to the east.
In response to a question from Chairman Thompson, Dr. Kenneth Valentas, 401
Edgewood Avenue North, stated that noise from the campus is a problem.
Mrs. Kathryn Valentas offered that there are minor noise problems in the
spring and fall which are aggravating.
• Mr. J ohn Paulson, 320 Edgewood Avenue North, suggested that the connecting
road be cut or blocked to prevent racing and that speed bumps be installed
on the existing west access road. Mr. Paulson stated he was in favor of
the use of evergreen plantings as buffer from surrounding residential
neighborhoods.
Mr. Juel Svenkerud, 6421 Westchester Circle, stated an objection to
building of the connecting road. He explained that he lives on the west
side of the campus near the small dormitories and is disturbed by the west
access road noise.
Commissioner Leppik asked the extent to which trees would be cut for the
road. Mr. Husnik replied that the proposed road width requires a 24 foot
wide cut through existing trees. Mr. Husnik suggested that the road width
could be reduced to 12 feet requiring the cutting of fewer trees if the
road were restricted to emergency vehicles and constructed as one lane for
one way only.
Chairmain Thompson asked whether the College would be willing to plant
evergreens, and Dr. Opsal replied that the College would be willing to take
this measure.
�
Planning Commission Minutes of March 22, 1982 Page 5
� Mrs. Lois Paulson, 320 Edgewood Avenue North, asked if there was any record
available of the number of false alarm calls to the Fire Department
� generated by the College due to the fact that she has observed numerous
fire equipment trips to the College. Dr. Opsal said that the College has
recently addressed the problem of a high rate of false alarms from the
College and has instituted a fine system.
Mrs. Kathryn Valentas, 401 Edgewood Avenue North, asked whether the College
has any long range plans to develop the west side of the College property.
Dr. Opsal replied that the College has no plans for development of the west
area and noted that the College agreed not to put parking in that area at
the time of their last expansion in response to neighborhood objections.
Dr. Maynard Nelson, Chairman of the Board of Regents, Golden Valley
Lutheran College, offered the information that the College plans to limit
enrollment and has a master plan for development available for examination
in the College foyer. Dr. Nelson stated that the College wishes to be a
good neighbor and that the Board of Regents is willing to do what it can to
minimize problems for neighboring residents.
Mr. J erry Kassanchuk, 245 Paisley Lane, stated that his home is located in
the vicinity of the southwest dormitory and that he is bothered by loud
rock music and traffic. He stated that he wished there were a way to make
addition of the new dormitory more palatable to neighboring residents.
• Mr. Husnik pointed out that the new dormitory will have no windows on the
south side.
Mrs. Kathryn Valentas, 401 Edgewood Avenue North, suggested that Planning
Commissioners visit the site to assess the effects on the neighboring resi-
dences before taking action.
Mrs. Lois Paulson, 320 Edgewood Avenue North, suggested the use of an
exterior building color which would blend with the surrounding environment
rather than use of white cement as an exterior finish.
Mrs. Kathryn Valentas, 401 Edgewood Avenue North, suggested the planting of
ivy as an alternative in order to minimize visual impact of College
buildings.
Mr. Jerry Kassanchuk, 245 Paisley Lane, stated his objection to a through
road and to increased traffic on the west access road. Mr. Kassanchuk
suggested moving the new dormitory building to the east with access to the
building from the east access road.
�
Planning Commission Minutes of March 22, 1982 Page 6
• Dr. Kenneth Valentas, 401 Edgewood Avenue North, asked whether the College
had considered parking space needs for possible future addition of a �yrm-
nasium building. Dr. Opsal explained that the College currently hosts
games in the existing gymnasium in the Classroom Building and would
construct additional parking area along with construction of a new gym-
nasium.
Commissioner Leppik suggested elimination of the parking lot on the west
side of the campus, provision of additional parking space in another
parking area and restriction of road access on the west road except for
specified times when students are moving in and out of dormitories in the
f al l and spri ng.
Mr. Miller cautioned against the reduction of parking space.
Mr. Jerry Kassanchuk, 245 Paisley Lane, stated that the parking lot on the
west side of the campus generates considerable traffic on the west access
road due to people driving in to look for space even when the lot is full.
Dr. Opsal stated that the College does not wish to concentrate all parking
to the north along Highway 55 due to the unattractive front appearance that
would present from the highway.
Mrs. Lois Paulson, 320 Edgewood Avenue North, suggested parking to the
south of the athletic track. Mr. Husnik stated that the soils in the area
� are peat suitable only for athletic field use and not adequate to support a
parking lot.
Mr. J erry Kassanchuk, 245 Paisley Lane, suggested moving the parking to the
east of the two small dormitories on the west side of the campus.
Chairman Thompson closed the informal public hearing.
Chairman Thompson suggested that the Planning Commission defer action to
allow time for Planning Commissioners to visit the site and view the master
plan on display at the College and to allow time for the architect to work
with neighboring residents on plan revisions designed to alleviate their
concerns.
Dr. Opsal stated that the College is on a tight time schedule required for
the tax exempt bond issue which will finance the expansion and that a two
week postponement could postpone use of the new dormitory an entire year.
Dr. Opsal expressed willingness to make desired adjustments in the plans
but stated that delay would present problems for the College.
• °
Planning Commission Minutes of March 22, 1982 Page 7
� Mr. Miller stated that he felt the Chairman's suggestion that Planning
Commissioners visit the neighborhood was a good one, but that he understood
the proponent's problem of a time line involving serious financial matters.
Mr. Miller suggested that there were two alternatives opened to the
Planning Commission. The first was to delay action to allow for a visit to
the site. The second was to incorporate into an approval recommendation
suggestions made for minimizing effects of the proposed development on
neighboring residents. Mr. Miller pointed out that the plan ad3ustments
would have to be extremely well documented and would have to be incor-
porated into a revised plan, which would be referred directly to the City
Council and would not be seen by the Planning Commission. Mr. Miller
stated that the choice involved three parties: The College faced with a
time problem, the neighbors who have concerns and suggestions, and the
Planning Commission. Mr. Miller expressed disappointment that the College
had not worked out plans with the neighbors prior to the informal Planning
Commission hearing and reported that this suggestion had been made to
College representatives by staff on several occasions. Mr. Miller
. concluded that the Chairman's suggestion was probably the best alternative.
On the other hand, he recognized the College as a good institution which
should be encouraged and expressed the wish that something could be done to
assist their situation.
Commissioner Leppik expressed support for the Chairman's suggestion,
stating that she understands the pressures on the College, but that the
� neighboring residents also have financial concerns.
It was moved by Commissioner Leppik, seconded by Commissioner Forster and
carried unanimously to defer action on the General Plan of Development for
PUD #34, Golden Valley Lutheran College, until the next Planning Commission
meeting and in the interim to visit the site. Commissioner Leppik
requested that neighbors draw up a list of concerns and suggestions and
that the College prepare alternative plan revisions to meet the concerns of
the neighboring residents.
Mr. J ohn Paulson, 320 Edgewood Avenue North, suggested that the College
stake the locations of the proposed new dormitory building and road. Mr.
Husnik agreed that this could be done.
Planning Commissioners, residents and College representatives agreed to
meet at the main College building at 11:00 a.m. on Saturday, April 3, 1982
to review the proposed plans and effects on neighboring residents together
at the site.
V. Consideration of Proposed Revisions to City Zoning Ordinance
1. Commercial Zoning District
2. Open Development Zoning District
3. P.U.D. Ordinance
�
Planning Commission Minutes of March 22, 1982 Page 8
� Chairman Thompson introduced this agenda item and asked Planning and
Redevelopment Coordinator Mike Miller for his comments. Mr. Miller
reviewed revisions to the PUD Ordinance, discussed the role of the Planning
Commission in the proposed revision of the PUD Ordinance, and answered
questions from Commissioners on the PUD Ordinance.
It was moved by Commissioner Forster, seconded by Commissioner Leppik and
carried unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the revised PUD
Ordinance.
Mr. Miller offered comments on changes proposed for the Commercial Zoning
District Section of the Ordinance. It was the consensus of the Planning
Commission to defer action on the Commercial Zoning District Section of the
Zoning Ordinance for research of retail use parking needs involving a sur-
vey of parking space provision and use in existing retail centers in Golden
Valley.
Mr. Miller answered questions from Planning Commissioners on revisions to
the Open Development Zoning District Section of the Zoning Ordinance.
Planning Commissioners suggested two amendments to the proposed revised
Open Development Section of the Ordinance:
1. Renumbering of Sections 2.06 through 2.08 to 2.05 through 2.07.
• 2. A wording change in Section 2.04 Para. 1 f rom "sporting events"
to "sporting activities".
It was moved by Commissioner Forster, seconded by Commissioner Polachek and
carried unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the revised Open
Development Section of the City Zoning Ordinance as amended.
VI. Annual Election of Officers
It was moved by Commissioner Polachek and seconded by Commissioner Leppik
to nominate David Thompson for the office of Chairman of the Planning
Commission.
It was moved by Commissioner Forster and seconded by Commissioner Leppik to
nominate Herb Polachek for the office of Vice Chairman of the Planning
Commission.
It was moved by Commissioner Forster and seconded by Commissioner Prazak to
nominate Peggy Leppik for the office of Secretary of the Planning
Commission.
�
Planning Corronission Minutes of March 22, 1982 Page 9
� It was passed unanimously to elect David Thom son as Chairman, Herb
P
Polachek as Vice Chairman and Peggy Leppik as Secretary of the Planning
Commission.
VII. Report on HRA Meeting - March 9, 1982
In the absence of Commissioner Eastes who attended the March 9, 1982 HRA
meeting, Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator Mike Miller provided the
Planning Commission with a report on the HRA meeting.
VIII. Report on City Council Meeting - March 16, 1982
Commissioner Polachek provided the Planning Commission with a report on the
March 16, 1982 City Council meeting.
IX. Progress Report on Valley Square Redevelopment Project
Chairman Thompson presented to the Planning Commission the plan for the
Valley Square Redevelopment Project recently finalized by the Yalley Square
Commission.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
�
Respectfully submitted,
avi ompson, airman argaret eppi , ecretary
�
•
T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: ARRIL 7, 19a2
FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, ASSISTAtdT PLANNER
SUBJECT: SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARI�dG - P.U.D. #35, BUSCH SITE
OFFICE WAREHOUSE
Kraus-Anderson Realty Company has submitted revised plans in application
for General Plan of Development approval without Concept Plan approval for
P.U.D. #35, Busch Site Office Warehouse. The P.U.D. site is the Busch
Greenhouse property consisting of 10.04 acres northeast of the intersection
of Boone Avenue North with lOth l�venue North. The new plans propose
two office warehouse buildings rather than the three previously proposed.
Total building area is approximately the same at 118,988 square feet.
Staff suggests that the Planning Commission set an informal public hearing
date of April 26, 1982 for consideration of the General Plan of Development
for P.U.D. #35, Busch Site Office Warehouse.
•
AP:kjm
�
� T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANN I PdG C0�1��1 SS I ON DATE: APRI L 7, 1982
FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT: PUD GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL -
PUD #34, GOLDEN VALLEY LUTHERAN COLLEGE
The Golden Valley Planning Commission at the last Planning Commission meeting
on Plarch 22, 1982 deferred action until the April 12, 1982 meeting on
the General Plan of Development for PUD #34, Golden Valley Lutheran College,
in order to allow time both for Planning Commissioners to visit the site
and for the architect to prepare plan revisions designed to alleviate
concerns of neighboring residents.
Golden Valley Lutheran College has not submitted a revised General Plan
of Development for PUD #34, Golden Vatley Lutheran College. Following
a meeting with neighboring residents and subsequent meeting with the City
Fire Marshal , College representatives determined that further plan modif-
ications are necessary.
Staff suggests that the Planning Commission defer action on the General
Plan of Development for PUD #34, Golden Valley Lutheran College, until
• the April 26, 1982 Planning Commission meeting in order to allow additional
time for plan revisions designed to alleviate neighboring resident concerns
and satisfy safety requirements of the City Fire Marshal .
/1P:kjm
•
• T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: APRIL 7, 1982
FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, ASSISTANT PLAN�JER
SUBJECT: INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING FROM INSTITUTIONAL (I-3) TO
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICES ZONING DISTRICT - 6681 COUNTRY
CLUB DRIVE
The 6681 Group Partnership, owners of the existing building located at 66�1
Country Club Drive, the former Elks Club, request rezoning of the property from
the Institutional (I-3) to the Business and Professional Offices Zoning District.
Permitted uses in the I-3 Zoning District under the current Institutional Section
of the Zoning Ordinance include the lodge hall or private club use formerly applicable
to this property, along with hospital , nursing home and clinic type uses. The
proposed revised Institutional Section of the Zoning Ordinance restricts permitted
uses in the I-3 Zoning District to the nursing home and clinic categories. The
building is currently used as a clinic for doctors and dentists. The 66�1 Group
Partnership proposes general office use of the building to include offices for
doctors and dentists excluding the laboratory facilities associated with a clinic.
The proposed rezoning to the Business and Professional Offices Zoning District is
in conformance with the Golden Valley Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which stipulates
• ultimate land use for this site as Business and Professional Offices. The rezoning
would serve to implement the City Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
Surrounding zoning and land uses include the Teacher Federations Credit Union,
which is zoned Business and Professional Offices, adjacent to the east and an
attractive single family residential neighborhood on the west. To the north
across Country Club Drive from the subject site and from the residential neighbor-
hood on the west is the Golden Valley Country Club zoned Institutional (I-4) .
To the northeast across Country Club Drive from the Teacher Federations site is
the Pako Corporation facility zoned Industrial . The south boundary of the subject
site is Olson Memorial Highway, T.H. #55, which forms a barrier from single family
residential land uses on the south side of the highway.
The proposed rezoning of the site from the Institutional ( I-3) to the Business
and Professional Offices Zoning District would improve compatibility with surrounding
land uses. Actual use of the building following rezoning would be similar to the
current clinic use except that office use may be expected to generate less traffic
than clinic use. Reduced traffic in and out of the parking lot throughout the
day would reduce adverse noise and visual impacts on the residences adjacent to
the parking lot on the west side. Other surrounding land uses would not be appreciably
affected by the proposed rezoning.
• �
Golden Valley Planning Commission
Rezoning 6681 Country Club Drive April 7, tg32
. Page 2
Existing building and parking area setbacks meet yard requirements of the Business
and Professional Offices Zoning District, and existing parking space on the site is
more than sufficient to meet Business and Professional Offices District parking
requirements. Required parking for the total building area of 21 ,960 square feet,
figured at one stall per 250 square feet of gross floor area, is 88 parking spaces.
Existing parking on site includes 198 spaces in the upper parking lot on the west
side and an additional 22 parking spaces in the lower rear parking lot on the
east side of the building.
� Based on conformance with the Golden Valley Comprehensive Land Use Pian and
compatibility with surrounding land uses, staff suggests that the Planning Commission
recommend appr.oval of the request from the 6681 Group Partnership for rezoning of
6681 Country Club Drive from the Institutional (I-3) to the Business and Professional
Offices Zoning District. The proponent should be aware that laboratory facilities
associated with medical or dental clinic use are not permitted in the Business
and Professional Offices Zoning District.
•
AP:kjm
Attachments:
l . Site location map
2. Site plan
.
• �� ice��� �'��as -� ""' �II :'��� v"0�1( \ ` :,�I�J�C1 .�
�, Irlu �;l m . . �`� ,:.ays _ ol 50.. 5.8� , , 1
i: a ,,�._ . .
o'Lb �y�„� "r' (a�° �=�jZl:a, � ^o v
a
a °' a�,y �9�o,' - :'yl�: :�:� ao B .,. o+ .., 4 — �T �-
o N � �_���c ,-o9j"" ; � e�, —� o
• F„ � � a-�� � ' o� . �S•yot 5oi oi tio'Llt �ti�.te �
� Q � � � 1; �� , ' 1 00l b� ,�o. •� �e,,.o O
Z J I u f ,f I �� j 'ii a� . __• � � � F o?� .
� d a! d! i � e_-A ' �p y� N � � , "'
p 3 ' �69}pl'�1• i � � � `!�.':� /L DS' - 1•�a9•~s•',;, Sif9 .Q �a�1
� 'D - I -- �- - it�. i`,•�'k-:- '0�� � '• .oS 69l..•° .w'vtbi,p ..�.�tOS � �'
r N ra � , •�l•F/: � f�1 �
_ °" I� ;; �1 : � � �:91r3—��-3-- s e .o ��,a h� �
�o I fE . , ,s. °�,J �,.y, 9 \�°' , .
�i p F � N � � ?j:,�°LS 459"'" 5'421 bb� biy p � .1i;E,� !:
� Y • b5 Z,�9 ..t►6�� o� �F, ;��y. N e
cn Q H I � ' � � P� ' �B 1i. % �' . a"0 �
(V 7 a N � '! ; _ �� ' .lo. '� f ° �•
� -� ' • , /, o` `t ��;, � ,�c. °�+a9 P/,B c. �� �/ !.� .�;°f
� _ � ; ,� `:�1 � . � d�,•' jl
V !o a�„ � , •,o . � ��1•`' `.~a' ��y � r g:9'. ��P
��,�,;,� -' i � '1 � �; ti : ,.�e9 �',v?_y:�g � s�o
w ^+o , ` �.. Q� ° `s ' ,'�9gya
2 a�F-� � 1 �, o tp � AF,s�j .,�� p�
�. v
� _ � � i 0 � � . ` p '�.O� � .•c , . o�s. O
v , o
� � `,�Ff � � o w_ a. �� �a�o �"�
.�i S � � , °a%6. � 'l!i
n
__ V • c �� ��o� \5ti / �p �� �'� ,.
. . •p_ �� � :. ��,.•e.°� e
� � � �-' po N � , � �06 �,n � ^ °,�so, ^�'3'as
� � I o : ' � o � e6as � v Fr �. '
N � � �
r� -p o ° °S'7t.82: v N ` e �d'A'�c
' U T r
� ^ � ��p Q p � � 8605� 9 � n D ..��epy • \1e
/y � L � �Q•- J•- � � '' �'��.�,/ °'i 10 � � .G�i a•o
�i 1 � (� V1�V1 L �+ . �.1'Y' ' 01 a '�S�6E'I - � o
G M` h N vf N N � <� � j \? <'-• �
� 7 ,� 3 °� C N s L � � �� . ..: ��D s. a g � [�• l l.e
�- - 4- c) � - - 1 � •_f(•t�. ,.h •g .o ' f�b
�0 U w'. •7 � N N � . ��gSb79 af,�� ° ' ' ° �'h 5 �
C 7� � � a, 1 t .f)�
��F G] d F- La. � �', � ��•�. � --��fi -
� � � �' ...'�1'lat�••�-- -- 1 - Oti ••� f •p 1\,,,� 0
, c • � .. � •n� . 1 "�s'' ..,� �
y � 6
� � �.-� � :� - �j i.� '` � o a"� � �� a • �r �� , �°�:�, "o�'-
+� c ^ 0 1 .'�°. � ' It f ri o y�� � B
UI N c' � ,°\', s �o,�y i1 ( '
c -v c� r � 9y� � i • °s �r
_ e� o • • o � /.. •
�O ✓ � ' Q �o N ° o � ,lj.Qf o°�•l�i�
7
C � b `D l 1 � o.�y +lay�k'� _�S•Cfi4l'C
N � I '° ° J1 ^ �' �'• F.:sa
e°� v�°' � �1• � o • ,,: �• � �r m�
• I ..�.�lo ° .-+
�o i .�t .. ••�15��°t`• S�L21 ' � Olj �olf
M,6
� a ... _ �
°° �.:' - - - - - - - - •�1'�4�... � 805f1 28 a r Z51 :� . S6
N �9+I1� ' 44' i ± oGS6 °o �D`�o rCFb� •N ,��.
(r4� • , .r� P'�'�Y o N �d�• �S�OZ�OE�oe�►'0'M
'^ o ,i '.'�n �,^+\,q�o(-( =� �b � f��86 ^p0 Ol�
o ' o -r .O, � �, , 054�0 �`y s h �i� t
M N f ; ��/ em �r •• 6'�• 99'Z8 ���C9�-�! I'll� 8FS'
�"' 1= L'C'9�'' ) ti':- ,r 0,6 s b�: �14!•, �
:�:ti -r.r,'1ct� y�>;ait�9•es�,�,� = ° a
-- -- :d- �.-4� `��7,:t:E. ��,�t�� :s n .°•:�
l+ '• ��' :c sE�'� i' 9 ..�
4b - - �°1•�I tM}oZL�� •!� � 51 y •i,t�.7. bl'l' ..�lb2o •D
5�+421 ; � �;.��4";'�0 � 'j¢�e5i-��'°�"'� 'sib
_ �
'i o°'��1@!'���.�V•� o°o �196�''�� to
� �EE - - - -':•.. _�"• _6590:'0�_ �0 3�t�t„S �?6 �
� � ..:.�.- (�•21S £a� � :i: ' �$: `'� S� i ,,. . . fo6sb v
u'� �
,° �7 ,( n � � � �y � � a LZ.4Ea�:C�a�S: �rdo� �fi d��c
7�= 'L4 b . y� � °o �.!N,cD o Ns"b �`; d.
; ;� :.�.- �►y - - , -... : 5s ^_ N '°�, � �" �.,LC.54,85 '
r ' o • ° ` • � ;.�t.�� ?� ^�� :
� ; �, � h m'� '' �
�s � bl+�il e _ � •° � s �• o�v os � a:e `�•c-►� e;
� d S�ZI : _ .r � h� .o s c, 65. b�S •a
�t� '^ '�" ,� 'LS ��21 Si�(� � °`.�wy4L56fl� ,R;� �'���e.3 e4.,9k. o;Q
� ;�'" ' � � 0 ° Cii�--�`-o�� =�'<y'fR.�'l" S s G1t0�a s` v
� € i �4 'eo+�i N �FS �� e e f ::a .�-: ��,�.4 �,a
3 or .r'1 '• ..
v+� ,;;. ..S_LSf:� . � : . � !�1._° f°,�P,+.�'%�' . ;�^'aL; o°
��,.� �,A� �— ��JS�l3f'� � -- — — '� q;�90 , ���L,r ��ba.ti �t
• � `"Q�M, � o .. �*: oor—;�- 4cioos zE•5�a .y�a; �,�
• a.r sbs .a F"� ' es� f
"i `.��^+ o � h � r 1F4 SdS � i i.,� � 144''�. � or °°
d �`, °- + : .o a • � o� � � o �� � 1 ^o N o a�• 3 00/bj�
� � �P O P// o� o V �O ;N r4+ e� �y M o�b \ ��u�
• ���'_° �' N N � N a � ``•.,� `� 4 1° O ° °�°-a o- 0�! �
} � �u tA o�v � � �o i P-` ,n �y `�b c,�,
z e o • � a � . � ' y a ^�'w oii i�j4oE�:
r 04t 001 �1 ` 001 � _�d .... cr 3..C460.:M r� �
• -A'f�-- •9!'0(Z M,OI�ONa Il9Zl 76'SU `Q�°�b�tIZ�C�•-'• � � ' e�'� 141I N_��.��
�•� '� m �1!I � b�yoi ^M N ��.. r ���_� . � •'1.a��L���� mb�
i/� A'/�� �/ o OI5�191*�7 a�; _ .a o� g'�°_ , er� ,�p`� �oo .F•i; �ic�o�f
we r1�V1�QQ Y `�'0'10� o�'': �� `° •�gq5�.4� ', " .... o
.'�; f L'l42 '0N ti�:��_f6j��8Z ZO'60I �`�-�c=-�', s 1 -a�,,�, m 1(L ; o0
�
� /`� ' -
, �FE
. I v til _ - —_. 2t6 9'S�/i°Y 7/l7;•••.%l�'Y[ —
l 3 .Pi,ll./S 62872..._
�I !�- i •r..�aa��w/�n1+a�nM
�( 1' 1 3 �1 ,•�
� i � \ � ! I
i I
r ;ry !I �� � I •
�t 1 �
I � °r • � �
� ' / _ � I i �
� � � f -� � ' �
I N � �
e i i � � !1 i i F L IQ �',
' � � � a 8' � � 9 �Z . �
� i � � i� F- � � ',
W - �
r : � I
� ` �-�1 � " �
� � �
, r , � ,sw�� ,� , i =
i � , � I I i
r ' ir 3 �-'�''� so ,; tF! I' _.. t
� � 36 •<n,;.,; ,;,,,c::;,
a \�♦ \7l/ \
� ; r ,� � \ \ ':.\ `\\\\;'�\ on �.
S ' N � �` \\ . � \ \\ . �` DO��!'
. j, I ! � \ ��\\F\� \•\\ :; °dY�y
Z � �
�� ,� � ' �� \N\!~/f\�\�`�\°s�'�
� � ' � ' � ��-` \�� N\\��N\ �:
1 S I �! v \ .�`,\\\�\�\\\�``\
I I '�
1
i �j:7�
� ' j y..,9� y �
� ' � r � �1� �
• ' i (:1 �# '� 41M"o Ym7 t '�'� �7m+�+�+q �1 0
�� Q,7�
J � ��
� �E �.
I s I � -- -_ 22f o"5'P•6 JI/I/ ip7'""F+0+-7 w,fni0� -- -- � �Z
I � � \ . w
� i � � 3 ��
i � � �? . � � ��
� i a$� � ''�- � � ��.
! -; �� ,� '" ;:
I I w�
y
3 i � ' p e�p
� v Q
� '�� N � o � \�
I a � a �
. ,� � Z F '' �
! �..� � � .. � g ��
; ,W{' •"'�R m 'YF a `e
I ( t � 1 � � �o
� I � �N =.� _. 1
' � � � � �.J �,�
I �
� � � a
I J I � �
i cs ; '�` �.*, #�
I 'f
I �-- - ��-�;` --
� `$ �-.
� , �
� S � o�� � " �'�
� , � .
g �+vt I• 3 ,� d�, �
I � Vt 1 � '� �'`�' •
I � ,�'.I�� .� 0 4�O
J I ��� � �
I �y� �-
I I � If I ~ _...M.rZ.cD.IN Z%tE4..._ �, 1� _
cE ��� �f` � 22F f°i '�!f"d ii r'71a w/ �t�m,�i_ N, �'
• � I ,
�
• T0: GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: APRIL 7, 1982
FROM: ALDA PEIKERT, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT: PARKING SURVEY FOR CONSIDERATtON OF REVISIOPdS TO COMMERCIAL
ZONING DISTRICT SECTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE
Staff is in the process of completing a parking survey of existing retail
center parking tots in Golden Valley, as requested by the Planning
Commission at the last meeting, for use in considering retail parking
requirements for the revised Commercial Zoning District Section of the
Zoning Ordinance. A staff report on the parking survey will be forwarded
to Planning Commissioners as soon as completed or will be made available
at the April 12, 1982 Planning Commission meeting.
AP:kjm
•
•