The URL can be used to link to this page

03-24-80 PC Agenda , ---__ - - ,..- Golden Valley Planning Commission March 24, 19$0 v�'' 7:30 .m. P (Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road) AGENDA 1. APPROVAL Of MINUTES - MARCH 10, 1980 II. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM ' Rosemary Thorsen, Mayor, City of Golden Valley � Iil . INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING � APPLICANT: Hennepin County � LOCATION: 9300 Naper Street ' REQUEST: Change Zoning from Residential to (I-4) ; Institutional i IV. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING - APPLICANT: L. N. Lundstrom LOCATION: 1725 N. Lilac Drive �y (Copacabana Apts.) ' REQUEST: Change Zoning from M-1 (Multiple Dwelling) to Business � ProfessTonal Office ': V. SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - P.U.D. 28 � � APPLICANT: William S. Peterson Architects ' LOCATION: 5000 Olson Memorial Highway � REQUEST: Request for General Plan Approval for P.U.D. 28 - ; . . Pondwood Office Park VI . PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW APPLICANT: Gittleman Corporation , LOCATION: Gittleman/Neslund Property REQUEST: Approval of Preliminary Plat VII . DISCUSSION AND FINAL REVIEW OF DRAFT ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT i ;`� . Terminal Warehouse District =�,°'�� VI11 . REPORT FROM SUBCOMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT FINANCING Sue Eastes z. Golden Vatley Planning Commission � Agenda ; March 24, 1980 IX. REPORT FROM NOMINATING COMMITTEE FOR 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS � Jody Sehlin � Don Hughes Bill Forster , X. ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION . � ' � i �ti , � , � � i I � - - ----: -_-- • Minutes of the Golden Valley Pianning Commission March 10, 1980 A regular meeting 4f the Planning Commission was held at 7:30 p.m. on March 10, ��980 at the Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chairperson Eastes called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Those present were Commissioners: Eastes, Edstrom, Forster, Hughes, Sehlin, Specktor, and Thompson. Also present were Mike Miller, Planning and Redevelop- rt�nt Coordinator and Martin Farrell , Assistant City Planner. Commissioners Levy and Polachek were absent. I . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 25, 1980. It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Sehlin and carried unanimously to approve the February 25, 1980 Planning Commission Minutes. II . INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING APPLICANT: Calvary Lutheran Church • LOCATION: 810, 820, and 830 Rhode Island Avenue North REQUEST: Change Zoning from Residential to Institutional Mike Miller briefed the Planning Commission as to the current use of the subject property, which is zoned residential and the proposed use of the property by Calvary Lutheran Church as an institutional use. He stated he felt the proposed land use would be compatible with the Valley Square Plan. The HRA retains the right to approve any future development of this property and this is tied in with the Valley Square Plan. He also suggested the Planning Commission recommend that the HRA recommend a 50 foot, landscaped buffer along the north section of the property from the Railroad right-of-way. Mr. Dayton Soby, 10 Hanley Road, President of the Calvary Congregation, addressed the Planning Commission and briefed the Commission about the vacation of Rhode Island and the sale of the property to the Church by the City of Golden Valley. He stated that the HRA has put deed restrictions on the property allowing the Church to use the properfy as an Institutional (I-1) use only. Commissioner Edstrom stated he felt the HRA has already predetermined granting approval to the rezoning. Edstrom then moved that this item be sent to the City Council without a recommendation. The motion died due to a lack of a second. Brent Sorlien, 1001 Quebec Avenue North, stated that his property is directly across from the subject property. He feels that the Calvary Church has been � acting illegally in their use of the land. He also felt that the City of Golden Valley and the Calvary Lutheran Church have been acting without proper notification to the local residents. He suggested that the rezoning be denied. � Page 2 Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 10, 1980 Commissioner Specktor questioned the legality of the HRA's deed restrictions. Commissioner Edstrom stated that he felt the City Council is not in the - position to view the Planning Commission's recommendations objectively. Commissioner Eastes felt that the Planning Commission should look at this issue from strictly a land use standpoint and then make a recommendation. It was then r�ved by Sehlin, seconded by Forster, and carried, to recommend approval of the rezoning from Residential to Institutional (I-1) , based on a predetermined zoning in the deed from the City of Golden Valley to Calvary Lutheran Church. Roll call was then taken. Commissioners Sehlin, Forster, Hughes and Eastes were in favor of the motion. Commissioners Edstrom, Specktor and Thompson voted against the motion. The rr�tion was carried by a vote of 4 in favor of and 3 opposed. Commissioner Specktor and Edstrom stated they felt that the situation seemed contradictory to them and therefore they voted against the motion. . • Commissioner Thompson voted against the rezoning because he would like to see the property rezoned 1-3, rather than I-1 . III . INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - P.U.D. 26 � APPLICANT: Calvary Community Services, Inc. LOCATION: Northeast Quadrant at Golden Va11ey Road and Rhode Island Avenue N. REQUEST: Concept Approval of a two structure complex for elderly residential . Mike Miller elaborated on the Staff Report which recommended approval of the Concept Ptan for the P.U.D. provided the recommendations made by the various City department heads will be recognized by Calvary Community Services. Commissioner Hughes questioned whether Calvary Community Services would pay property taxes and Mr. Miller informed the Commission that they would indeed have to pay property taxes. The proponent, Clyde McCarty, 424 Yosemite Avenue North, explained the background of Calvary Community Services, which was formed in October of 1g77. He then explained the reason for building the elderly high-rise and the Concept Plan � for the P.U.D. � Pa9e 3 Mtnutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commisslon Ma rch 10, 1980 Jay Johnson, the architect of the proposed development addressed the Planning Commission and requested an opportunity to exhibit new changes in the original Concept Plan. The original Concept Plan involved a seven story structure ,while the new concept plan called for an eleven story structure. Commissioner Edstrom expressed concern about the local government becoming too involved with Church activities. Pat Sorlien, 1001 Quebec, stated she would not like to see a building of this height built in the area. Brent Sorlien, 1001 Quebec, also expressed deep concern about the proposed eleven story buitding and he objects to the Concept Plan. Mike Reed, 1008 Quebec Avenue, stated he felt that an eleven story building is too large for the area. David Thatcher, representing C�lvary Community Services, stated that Calvary Community Services has been in contact with Jewish Organizations in St. Louis Park and that the elderly high-rise would be an "open" project. • Commissioner Hughes stated he had �o problem with a seven story structure, but felt eleven stories would be too many for the area. It was then rtroved by Thompson, seconded by Sehlin, and carried to recommend , denial based on the impact of the proposed high density and the height of the structure as proposed iniheir Concept plan. Commissioner Edstrom voted nay. It was then moved by Edstrom, seconded by Specktor, and carried to ask the City Council , if they do ap.prove the Concept Plan, that they also request the Human � Rights Commission to work with Calvary Community Services to develop an affirmative action plan to insure that all persons will be welcome into the project without regard to race, creed, color, or religion. Roll call was taken. Commissioners Edstrom, Hughes, Specktor and Eastes voted in favor of the motion. Commissioners Forster, Sehlin and Thompson opposed the motion. The motion was carried by a vote of 4 in favor of and 3 opposed. It was then moved by Hughes, seconded by Sehlin and carried unanimously to . recommend that the proposed elderly high-rise not be ove� seven stories in height and the density be such that the parking requirements can be met. • Page 4 • Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 10, 1980 Because of the late hour, it was moved by Forster, seconded by Thompson, and carried unanimously to move items VI . SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING, and VII . SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING, up to the next spot on the agenda. VI . SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING APPLICANT: L. N. Lundstrom LOCATION: 1725 N. Lilac Drive REQUEST: Change Zoning from M-1 (Multiple Dwelling) to Business and Professional Ofifice Building It was moved by Sehlin, seconded by Thompson and carried unanimously to set the Informal Public Hearing date for March 24, 1980. VII . SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING APPLICANT: Hennepin County LOCATION: g300 Naper Street � REQUEST: Change Zoning from Residential to I-4 Institutional It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Sehlin and carried unanimously to set the Informal Public Hearing date for March 24, 1g80. IV. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - P.U.D. 27 APPLICANT: Gittleman Corporation LOCATION: Gittleman/Neslund Property - South of Glenwood Avenue REQUEST: Concept Approval of a two structure 108 unit Condominium Development Mike Miller summarized his Staff report and suggested that the Planntng Commission give favorable consideration to the Concept Plan, taking into consideration the comments from the various City department heads. Mr. Gittleman, the proponent, addressed the Planning Commission and suggested that they view the project together with the single family dwelling units. Glen Eides, 345 Brunswick Avenue South, went through a thorough history of the property and requested that the Planning Commission recommend approval of � only one structure, as opposed to the proposed two structures. Page 5 � Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 10, 1980 Diane Asproth, a local resident, questioned the Concept Plan and its connection to the Plat. - , It was then moved by Sehlin, seconded by Thompson and carried unanimously, to recommend approval of the Concept Plan conditioned upon the acceptance of the Plat and the recommendations of the City's department heads. Items V. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW; VIII . DISCUSSION AND FINAL REVIEW 0� DRAFT ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT; IX. REPORT FROM SUBCOMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT FINANCING, and X. PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION REGARDING ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR THE COMING YEAR, were postponed until the March 24, 1980 Planning Commission Meeting. Chairperson Eastes stated she will represent the Planning Commission at the City Council Meeting on March 13, 1980. It was moved by Edstrom, seconded by Hughes and carried unanimously to have Chairperson Eastes draft a letter to A1 DeSautels and Kathy Swanson thanking them for their service on the Planning Commission, Chairperson Eastes named Commissioner Sehlin, Hughes and Thompson to the Nominating Committee. � Nominations for Planning Commission positions will be made at the March 24, 1980 Planning Commission Meeting. Commissioner Edstrom suggested that in the future, minority reports be incorporated into the Minutes. `-, Meeting adjourned at 11 :30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sue Eastes, Chairperson Martin Farrell , Recording Secretary � � March 17, 1980 T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Mike Miller, Planning � Redevelopment Coordinator SUBJECT: Presentation and Discussion of the Proposed Capital Improvements Program The last elert�ent of the new Comprehensive Plan for Golden Valley, the Capital Improvements Program, is now ready for presentation to the Planning Commission. Considerable time and effort has been put into this five year program by the City Council . Therefore, a presentation and discussion of this very important s.egment of the Comprehensive Plan will be given by Mayor Rosemary Thorsen for the benefit of the Pianning � " Commission. Copies of the Capital Improvements Program will be distributed at the March 24, 1980 Planning Commission meeting. � � � March 17, 1980 T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Mike Miller, Ptanning and Redevelopment Coordinator _� SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning - Hennepin County, 9300 Naper Street BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Hennepin County is requesting that the following real property, legally , }described as all of Blocks 7, 8 and 9 and vacated Fries Place adjoining rlsaid Blocks 8 and 9; all being in Lakeview Heights Addition (also knownJy jas the Sheriff's Radio Station) be rezoned from Residential to I-4 f �Institutional . (See attached Area Map) . The site in question is comprised f approximately 10.5 acres of land, and is bordered on the north by Earl Street, on the east by Flag Avenue, on the south by Naper Street, and on �" �the west by Wheeler Boulevard. } The Sheriff's Qadio Station sit_e_was_o�i_ i� nally developed for its resent use in 1947. �The current City Zoning Ordinance'was enacted in 1955, and ,_ or reasons unknown this site was zoned Residential , making the facilit� a non-conforming use. In 1975, Hennepin County was granted a zoning � variance for the purpose of replacing the original radio tower which hea---? 4become unsafe and also obsolete. The tower was subsequently replaced withJ� ��the existing 400 foot tower. Technically, the matter of the site being�, �improperly zoned should have been addressed in 1975 when the variance �for the radio tower was requested. � -ihereJi`s some q�es�iori as to the legality o�-grant-'rng�a-vari-an-ce-for-a-non--conforming use, but for reasons unknown the matter was never addressed. jThe present structure and facility consists of a one-story masonry building iwith a brick veneer exterior which occupies a ground area of 2,149 square s�1 jfeet. �;It is proposed by Hennepin County to add a one-story addition to the � � east and north sides of the existing structure (see attached site plan) that� would increase the overall ground area coverage to a total of 5,244 square '- feet. � --- - - - - - �� Use of the subject facility includes police, fire and emergency medical ' ,radio dispatching services, as well as radio equipment installation and � � �repair services to 46 municipalities within Hennepin County. This is a �24-hour, 365 day per year operation which has a staff complement of approxi- �' jmately ten persons per shift�--fThe purpose and inten e proposed i �addition is simply for the purpose of providing an improved level of service ',to the municipalities requiring radio installation and repair services to � `their vehicles and/or portable transmitting equipment. It shoutd also b� �o-i-n�ted-o�at-tha�t-tt��s s i e a--ll so--conta�i-ns a-pi sfoY sfioot-i ng rang--e w�i i cTi`i s not included in the expansion plans. It is t e e and intent of this rezoning petition by Hennepin County � {,to place the subject property in a zoning district that will be compatible� ,w i t h t h e p ro pe r t y s l a n d u s e. �#e-cur ren-t---Eomp-reiietts-r ve--P-l-att-f or-t h e-Lit y Laf-6o-fi-den---Va�1-e�--+x��uda�-th-i-�s i te as a pub 1 i c 1 and use. Ad j acen t an � Page 2 Request for Rezoning - Hennepin County, 9300 Naper Street Memo � �__ — — -- `, uses include mostly single family residential development to the south,� �west and north. These neighborhoods have all developed since the Sheriff'� �facility was established in 1947. The area to the east of the subject � ��property is zoned Industrial , and although undeveloped it is a part of the� — ------ — ��General Mitls Research Center proper�y. — ----- __ --- __ _-- ---_--- Within the Institutional zoning classification there is no one subclassificatZon that addresses itself specifically to this type of government service facility. However, ft e I-4 Institut onal sub-district allows "Viltage offic s , p�,fire stations, ana other lands incidental to the operation of the Village." jConsidering the land use in question, and a broader interpretation of the ;�1 �Zoning Ordinance in this case, -i�—�oti��ppear that the I-4 classification ,� ��would be most appropriate for this particular land use situation.�!, While I �the facility in qnestion is County owned and operated, it does provide � ' Cservices to municipal government, and in a sense does provide the same ? �services that the City would provide if it had to operate the same type o� �facility. �� - . ,,___J_ - Other land uses allowed within the I-4 Institutional sub-district include the following: _ 1 . Golf courses, country clubs and polo fields, excepting those carried on as a business, such as miniature golf courses; � 2. Parks, playgrounds, Village offices, fire stations and other lands incidental to the operation of the Village. 3. Such other uses which, in the opinion of the Village Counci] are compatible with the uses specifically described above. RECOMMENDATION ��tegardless of whether the zoning is c ange or this property, the us_— e ma� `i cont i nue as a legal non-conformi ty. However, as a non-corrf-- -'— � `�facility cannot be altered or expanded. In as much as the land use is �-ecognized as part of the current Comprehensive Plan, and considering th� �act that a rather large residential neighborhood has grown up around this� �facility without any apparent adverse effects, it would appear that the 'rezoning would be compatible with the area. Therefore, I would reco�mend � �that the P 1 ann i nc�C -i-de-r—�a�re�aW�--ac�i^n �r- �___±__h i s_rezon i ng i ` request. �,; �-------- � � - --- - ------ . -� y\�� tio. y�., � ° �i11.38 � OF �LVMOUT�{ . CITY_ OF PLYMOUThY � --- / �� °� �� - � OF GOLOEN VALI " � CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY w __ i3ie.,2 �. ---,c - ,r- --,,--,�--�--r - �.- -� -*°--�,;�:Z T -T2(�D9T2 --�--* --,- ,78 : ��3i14� R , , • �s20 19,2 � �.�;� /6�6 a � pi •60 ��a ' l'��2 i7i6 i720 .�500 �BO? .�BOB l 2 t9/60� � ' � � ` � ,I� : • =,� �' �(JI� i ti W A _..N� s �1 w .�0 p 'N N ti N «--+'A�, �� ry , y • �n � _ •o . p� . � . ' � W • • / O �� 60 N_ �N 0�' I ��r _ w , _.� . 6 � �p . .. . .. T .. .. .. .'� ~ � 60 • - •• , .. o �f. 60 , I Z .'� .'� I e � � ai 4,8 � - - - ., v� o m � �I ' . . ; W - • '!- w ;n W w w 'p ` N ,n�i � b w I, � � �7 � �tfa � 1f ��W I 6V � 6e _N S� ^O t0 m �, �I Of ti ..A o W m� V-� O='� •�' —I � 70 -�` _ w ^� � � � � �' � � � • � I _I Vf t0 i 2009 20/) • I� • �� •;I �N .. ^ .\ r , ., _ / '' 6G. �• �� o ., . . ° �3 /B� � � � C /�25 /70/ /7rJ5 /�09 /,(3•��/7 /72l /BO/ /B05 /809 � �� .�+)w, �E` IF�z tt;t7 ��lE �., o ��/ o ' IV Z Iti7 t�/f �;;-�2 /E�6 /F2. 1629 �628 1E�2 l636 1720 /BOO iB04 /B06 /Bl2 D Z ,� r . � ., - � � •' �F f/.ld o 13�.g� �6�•0� : : :w � � r � � 5 =C0 60 ;�• • � � _�_ _ _ ' � N �- W- w- WNN 5° m � % o`�s � °- PN � w r r � h � o0 � ��? N lA Qf ;,,,�I m "'�p ' O a II' � Y N w � o/B/6 � � ,� 1�7 � O � W . . w a `^ w � "' ! °' y� °o � r' O IV , 6'. �. [e •• ^ ` z . GI Le. ° - _ 60 ,.�,... .. , ., . . .. 6f 19 o u+ , I S �'fi 6e - •• 60 � 60 � , �.^ �"'n Z � � � � 9 �� O �`?' W�'w- q � �� . � '.1 � Of �a ,-�^�"'i A ,:,w - W 3`� D �� ,v � ' � � B w o n) o. �u I°o N� �° - �°� • 'I • � : � H ^' � � � �� ' � 200/ 20O.S c^009 2C�/ � � t' � � �A � �� I � /� � � , I l9 /9/3 � � r0 /E�3 !6l' /B2 f625 �6�9 61 �I.67 m I s. I . 6e 6e � 6 •. - � ►B ° ,8�5 �8,� o � oHILLS RO �. AVE. o _ r , �' /�/_ fflg /F2 1624 i630 iF 6 IV 'f 6. C s 12S-D � 60 . • , .. � ' 3C:ar, =}5 ° ' (� ft.6� _ ,o i ) ° I� � /904 /90B l9'l6 � dcC�k ', �10/1 � � � 8 - s B ..� - „' w' � i � tu�� .n• �..•i. �tO �� 9 C f/ � .,�'n N �' f�1 ` W N i"V+ i � � J �', �i � N �, '"�, � �a, �o ,�o^ _r� ° i4 i ' e ^' Q ° �• • • � � OI �� J�� A i � — 70 � � p� 0�1 ' � 19.n 3Gi4� 61 69. B .a i i�, �: e 4 r- �A .. 64.5 �o °� , .. � � o0 � e So � p� � e 60 .. 1625" 1619 61 °1 //,: fFC• g 6r � �� 4n 7. o S w• • • - •� � � � � �I `1 ..�'�+i !71 �'„CA � �W .n N -:n N I .� q o /� s �`D ^, �° o a,� : � - O� N-J � _ V'� � � = w - I "� p• . � • �n•�` wo8 � � � ,o°I N N � /905 /909 /9/i'� � 2005 2��:�.9 z'Ol � � �E2i 61 66df - - i ..` . , s o� '� � � 6op .. � "o i6�� 6/' �633 763Tv,. l3 4 � � l Y � • t,. � � I• �GE°;-TYS�UR A`'�. is/a /EI6 e�a l6 /632 i - - -- p- � 0 � r...^, %s I . 61 ° _ .,. � � '� i 6o i , bo a �� • �• � � �• - - - i i �' _ q , ''°�� ° i,�_ ��i9oa isos i9iz � i9�� ?c�� z,�o.� zci /62►� � � � .,. - �o� (� � �� s � Q.,,�_ �� v. ,� lp v`: � _ °° : `° • : ^'°D � ++� � � �, '� - o , iw'° J• • • • • �oc� �.` � � I � ti� w 61 - - - I b � � `\ s+.� 60 6 0 _ .. . - 61 68.39 � _ I i i so , �r�' �\ - ,� ' 60 �. .. ° I 60 o I� � � I. L�b � ' w �w 'I ' � �� i N - 1 ' -' w-J Ja W N � � � �n �• ti � w �„ W - d� - : - N i� Np� NN A -""W !vN w� � _ _ _ � � m " ,: ' t'iO� I� I 1 i • �/� �°»• � A• o • i', • � � � .� a 15; � • . ', � 6 70.29 SO g o � i � r i25 bO i � 60 ..� 6P ,�sz9 �r�� l637 �Z ' o�--r.l:'.. o FLAG _e6a. AVE._ _ tVA. � 'AV E. �°.134,8,6... o �----o — —T (fi�ed /0-6-65) /�//9�J' iFi:ec l�-h 65) i I i I O � � o� i �� ' � � � � ` I — i N � ��. � ---�-W �--___ . -.- I I - i G � I { ,\ I I ' F , � . zo9 � ! �_.; i I cn` � + �� N � ; � . ,_ - - . � � O o O �� .. . � �O� �� o � a RAD�4 DISPATCH FACILITY � � GOLDEt� �(ALLEL(, MINNESDJA `, �\ � � ��` �� _ � � � ��``� ��74°� __" —`` �\ t�,e �\ �� \\ ��.� �__ '�1 �� •� � � � � � � \�\ `__ `'_` `� �� _ �_ .� �� —�� . �`` �� _� � �� —� `� �`� -457--�_��_ 1��_ � D'--- =�=��9-____—=_ —'�� bZ � �� --�� ^1�� \ �� / y�• �� _` ♦ '� / � �.- •�g>>��i � �� ,�__�-------� �' —— ,��"`_— _ '`� �� i —__a� '�_____ �� _= —� � � / p� �' i��q�0 � ��`�``\�� t _ \ � �_ � � � \ '� �� '�—8+1 ---_� `'� `�\��`� �� \ \ `\ \ �. / �� q�b-'— __— �`��\ � � �\\\ � � \� \ � � \ .n A�� `\�� \ �� `� � ��\\\�\\ \\ \ � \ �S -�� \ �� \� \ \ \ \ � \ Z� ` '/ � 4 •p Y'_a� '• ��\�.�\ \\\ ��\ \ � \� � \ `� \\ � 1 � + o �. ?'-O� \ ��\� •�\� � \ � � �` � � �� \ �°-- �_'�—�-� �� b �J �� _ i 11 ( � , �� ` \`\ _ \ \ .\ \ �\ .\ I � y� . I � � � i' .'` ,\\ ��\\�\ t� � \\ \ \ ' �\ �'� � i �� ' F /•��l �� 1� 4 .� ��` � � �\�� \ � �� ;� ; ' T�:.: � _ . ~--�--; , � ; �, � � � � , �, �, \ � tir I " ' �� : �� ' � I j i i I i j � \� � � � '�. I ��I I � ��;- :� : ;> , � � I � � I � I � � �' i : , : � I I � I 1 1 � I �N i � �� l w, �� i �� J�� ; � `� ` ��j �i % -, ; 1 1 j � l �� j � i �� .{ _ ! '� $� ; �' , �; �� ►� � ' , e; �� ; ;I i i ! �� i � i � ' , i � � ; � � I � � �� ''�' � � �,�/ i I/ / / i/ i � � i �� '� \\ ---- - �' � �. / / � / / / / / .�--. 1 1 � . ...�..'_ g � j�i , �j%/ � i�%/� � % � _� \� I� ,� ��\�� \ � / ' ,� � � '� � � � �i i � i � � �/ � � � 1 � �\ \� .' .: T , � � / �' e � \ ` ' � � � ��: �� .�.. '�� -- :T ��/��i y�'j �`i� / � � l � �-- � -\ 1� i �'�Y� ,: �� /�F'� � 1 , '( � 1 � . � 1 �'—°°— �--'------' i / �� /� � � � � �� . � � �� \\_� i ��\�,�\,� 1 � � \ _—�� — �.. �� \ ; t 1\ � \ \ I . o F 1 � � "°� ° � �4� '''' .�� . /�° � �� `� �� \ � �� , � s� ' ` ;�� \� ` ' � ��1 � �� \�� \� \� \\ \\ \� o � � 1 � " ' � � � �'$° � 1\ \\ \ \\ � la� �—anuw / `�� .�� \\�� \�\� \� `� \� \\� �� MMWw� .`� � � � \ \ � \ `� �f Z �-� � �� \ * �� db' '� '�� \ �\. �\ �� \ � \ J- %•� a�� I � \ -', �; ' �� \ � \\ �� ; � / ° ° ' \ \ � � ' �� ,` ,,# � ��` �� i� � I \ \ �� \ � � �a� °—�e`a� '� � 1 1 � � � \ �s'� � I � \ � �� d• �----- °�o'T• ___� i i I � \ �� f o \�\�\�� \=------------��--------- � ' � ' i �� i� .� p �\\ ��------------ -----�� / � � �� \� �� —_ '�� \ �� IY (�p I � ,�� —_�� – � , �;� \ OO ! � ��\\ `�` ��- _�� _ � ��'�"� / 1 �� ,��/ ~ —'— �� _` —_ -�'�--- i �, \� �� ` ��`_ �_�� \�` — ==``__ —__ —� � �� L � � �.� ��_. ._� - - __ �._--�._� ,� _—� v'� � �``` '----�—�— � ��.��.�� S� .��T �i'�'�'- � •v IS�Dt � ��.�..��.��' � ' �� . Dc:'�� I/ — —�� ----- : —' � ---------- \ ��.. -��,--•._...— ,,,�t�s`�� / • ��'�y��"'��.��+�� =4;� '--.-.-- -' E�ECTRIC/ �'�� ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL �°�. � . pr�t�� . ��.� �n-rrr�'�T � � March 18, 1980 T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Martin Farrell , Assistant City Planner SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning - 1725 N. Lilac Drive BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS , This request arises on the aa_r_t of L_N. Lundstrom, owner of the sub�e_c� ,�ro ep rtY_� The basic request is for the rezoning of approximately 2.94 '!acres of land currently zoned M-1 (Multiple Dwelling) to Business and � �Professional Office Zoning District. The address of the subject property�I `�is 1725 North Lilac Drive. It is situated just west of T.He 100 and north� �f St. Croix Avenue. ) — The Copacabana Apartments �re the current use of the subject property anc} iprovide thirty one rental apartments units. It is Staff' s understanding �that Mr. Lundstrom intends on converting the apartment structure into an; '�off i ce bu i 1 d i ng�-'fC�e ex�st i ng garage on t-he property-- woul3�e remove i n o`r�e--r-�o provide the necessary parking-required in the ordinance. The zoning ordinance requires one parking space for every 150 sq. ft. of offi.ce � area. According to the facts provided thus far, Staff is not aware of the total square footage that will be used for office space. Therefore, parking requirements are not determined as of yet. 4The subject property is located south of Byerly's Shopping Center which is �zoned Commercial . The area to the south of the subject property is zoned `�Residential and directly west of the subject property is the Covenant Manor� �iSite. ;; One hundred and two elderly housing units are presently under constructio ; on the 3.5 acre, Covenant Manor Site. Completion of that project i.s scheduled J S for Fa 1 1 , 1g80. � — -- — — — — I�-------- A major concern 'rn this particular area of Golden Valley has been traffi¢ generation and access. Depending on the size and number of offices thatl ill be tocated on the proposed site, a Business and Professional use woul^'d, �rr�st like1y increase the amount of traffic generated. T.H. 100 is accessabte_ � for both north and south travel at Duluth Street and there is accessibilityl `' �� for southbound traffic at Lindsay Street. Both of these access points have� �been a major concern for the the City of Golden Valley`s Engineering Departmen�, �as well as the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Westbound traffi� � on St. Croix would also create traffic congestion through a residentialr �eighborhood and increase the already existing traffic load at the intersectio �f St. Croix Avenue and Douglas Drive. ,i — — — — — � — — — �ovenant Manor submitted to the City of Golden Valley (previous to their , ��receiving general plan approval of their P.U.D.) a parking usage and traff�c jgeneration report.�T_his report wes�repared or t em �y�Crown Research;a � co-nsurt�in`�_��r-m.--iTh i s type of report proved useful and benef i cial to the �ity when reviewing Covenant Manors ' P.U.D., March 18, 1980 Request for Rezoning - 1725 N. Ltlac Drive Page 2 � RECOMMENDATION {The rezoning of this property is not substantialty inconsistent with `isurrounding land uses. At this time, the City feels that traffic flow in� -�this area is a de�inite problem. This problem will be magnified as the �� traffic generation will be increased, once the 102 unit Covenant Manor �� Project is completed. A change in zoning from Multiple Dwelling to Business;: ��nd Professional Office would also increase the amount of traffic generated� �n the area. I would recommend that the Planning Commission request that �the proponent provide a traffic study prepared by a competent Transportation� `�Planning Consultant before they take any action with regard to the requested �,rezoning. In view of the aforementioned considerations, I would further , � �recommend that the Planning Commission defer any action until a traffic �� ____--�_____— — `�� study has been presen___ tedJj � � �r= ��t�. f . �►a'"� . • . . � • j 1� .. � � • � ',f�C`C`Q,� ` ' �s 1 � ` , � �e�. � .-�:,� i •`-�'� --• �Z71¢.'.E� lt �" • _ .� ' � �� , � �_ _ aa••-------.''d`•'"J:::. -----� .+�,.' r 33s . Ko Q3T . �l� J��— �T45.i /a{__ �g�� '' �� ' . �o. . . �y��,4"�' o . `� � - �r� �' � , �p,� 6 � ��' i � �: i� ��. L. . �H . 331 - �.�' � �'� sf�►`�.^�� t � • , , � : - �n � ` � � � � 1 � � � �� ' � • �� ' • . � __.___......_3�0_,_..•---- ' ... g�J P'�RT OF E I f�••: � ' � �r' � . �-„� �' --•- -;,, ' °�` -�' �,�-�� :�� T 1e �4; l7637 � ' �---�+r--- ypF 'K ; �a°i ;w �.fi3�g' 'I � �.7I9-,tb � ' � � � . � '�� p � ��,� �a l3a.t4 -• 3�4.69' $� N ��.: �, o�� ? Ta �; i �, s,m�-��, e�a��s' �e o � �:o. � � r� �� p_: o � � �r a N �a� � o "' yq•s�aa"�' r a {:= � � �� . . � ! :� . • � � • ,� � 183. 5 f � ' �i , � _ � ,. r s = • ; � �`,� . � �rtt acT. �,• A � ., � � � --w�� », . ' �� . � Y99°5149'E ZZ2.13 � v : _�.s. ; � a' j �i� ��' � •� � ' W �� . FI o�� .'3� -" ;�, • «a � ' n v� '^- ,�. i`6 ) I = . a o �. fI A�1t�8"IY 738 ... b — Q � ��, � / � — � ° `.°° Ma!'S7�g-E Zi2.52 = � � �I� � �''�'� � � i • �'`� _ �_sa aa.unr sr. sa 'b�'zs'E .. __._.� ` � ' •/� � .i �.- � � � ;" ' "Zio� i a +� .,�.,,, e • r . i �� ; . �:..�f �'�' � �. RqC�. m ; �� /�-?V�O. / ' ` • . � N i �. � A � � O• 8 0 � � 6 ` � o � � � o _-�� ' '�` . N ID ° ?s.. �, � .W � :� � .; ; �u w. sr�oo�,,� � o o z�a�� '�, ., � •� ! �J 5630 S� CRO/X • ° � ' = • Y $ P = � 1i88�2'155"E 389.74 � t. ' • �_ . '� 3 e.2 � � . . . . �` �" . 'i�: i +{'E' � S�B�Z��SS�Yd ,__..._.14... ..7�7� �� s �� _ � a iME'1f123�R' 7 � A I � 4 �� " � � I�A.S3 -, � '� v t s:.r: •' .. . `' � ��-• � . �ySiN 350.Z9 "` a 8 .o,�-"' j I , -= z� °'- :n� �,�„r� . I�o2. '�° '�,• 1 / '° � � .� �. ! � � ir� '� e:� l� o� I t �,. • �,_ gr,.a�.-..ilt . � 3 �/ .p � +� � � �` z � 4o:Q? ' � ; �_ �K� � � � 1 _ ,_ �:- 'Sf.2 41 . � --; : �w . �:.�_ �►�.t_ s-w „�.4e � A��V�� a�oi --s;-�� r"3.�t� �`' ' tt�+�i�ie� �� ae�s ia.i -�. ro�.�� X13810) �'� oe � ,?��• „ . :3°.:•' o� �• ��.,^ �;'39r.Z; •�.35 rk. ('�951) 0.36 Ac.+: f � •X' o� o� �I :a• 33t � •�. _ -..., ~ --= sr ,U(�55 a:� p .o � oc � �n —'4'�-y�;,�. ...... f � �'� 9'ilP3 �i+ ��° I ,^ '� ° �n � 'n � �'�. � � cM�+ ' � �'-:��I�', '� � � o• � ��y ��+1 M v � t �pJ• • �89�� rr� "�"v.�y�� . 2E3�E /I2 �v � . �. ' .� ..�'-'�"' -. "�'� '� �; co��►�A� �ee,�s ._� � ,f . �. � �� 2�p. � ; � '�----- � -- � . - ; � 1,`- /►�� m ��y , t1•:�� r,�o5 2� � S` " �_'r388 �{� - ��.�._ �:M".': �'[F.�(�"rt�' l_f'�c�G a e .0 n � e 16Y�Q 3 � 16N M + � •n S� �� _ M1 `.r. '-`'� ' �_a' G ir d S., 4 �+ � �- /6 �y� . � . � . n - �sa «.: �s l,�- i9 ' �I.S oe m.M� LDTy� AUD. ' 'a� �a SU6. .346 • � M � � �wEL�OME ;��f� ��s�.sl (�e�eJ o� o �E. .,,�o. . .. �; • _ �D. � �. - • G.7d .a " � ioo. :'s ° •::� ':'�.. �� • � = � ,,..�T , ,zz � � s.l ,� ... _ u ;. f �» .s 'auu `s�3-1 - .."/�` "� ti�°'� .21 .3i � s�'�1�,�•8 � �M�. e, �ro 3 � ' �, • ` . ' �� . � ;F.LOT 2 AUOa� � � �4G• 1 �c;, o � �� •h • * _ o U8. . 346 �� ►4G• ,� g •�`� ` � .� e "�� 1 � � ��1 � " • t,., •- . -� �` � o � . � vj=i ifeC�D-b� Io � w v��i 6 e� � M • pa�, -e� � Y.?��, .1 e� � • � �o � �� ?° r � 140. Z y��3 �o` J 1 ' �p0 . � ' '� � �'�LOT AUD!s� -" -;,,�, � a`� �+ ,� � ' :'�;' ,. � ' �5�. I�t .s46 til �: ��4; .i4�.�K W �, ' s3o �.� i t.sn .o �'x-. � i`o:'1 3 � o. s � �. .. � � ' `•' I. t�.� �� t.o. �4 .�� /��e� r' ` 7!._ 1 �4 � � .g �i y • P., _ �� •� _�O}� SO 1 C�i¢' ��•�1{7� `�:� " 4 � i R I I � � I , ` _ ... 267.Bo ......_ E ' — � oe H . N ' • V � I..� � C.�� t11 . ' �� t` v �`\8�S ' • �•� -W 3i .,, l7.0 (l� ` w'.��\�\��: � ; � � � --- -�4�5- - 2e.2 ��`\� ��. �` �e.Z -- - --- \ � \�`' �� `� ' . ' ' ��.\�' `:� � `�� I . \\\\ \\� \ .\. ' � .J \\\\;'•\� s � � '� .\��•.:� ! �'�a /'� . � .\ ' .`� \��` � � :s' � � `� `.� � �'•,�� I � �yQ� ., �' �� \, \�� . .� c a_ � \-4��j�,� \ �`�'�"\-.1 .� `� V ��. ( , j\ ` \ ..` �"i I .1:. IN i � � w \ . . �•,.,:� \ .. ! � � � � �� '� � : � `� \ n \\ � '`� �� : \\. :��\ � , . �.. o ti �� ti`' \ N ' \ �\ �� \ \ ` , � 1 $ � �i ia �\\�� t\ �� i� Sr x�' '. = �. ,�.� �. \ i . � t'��5 1 � ,\ ,\� �\: :\ .' e,,r �. 9E: �`� `� '� . ��• .\\Yai _ I__ � . I 8�; � a � _ : --�555 --- \- \ .;.'�\ -- -� - � . �� p ' W\ � W . � • �� r�M Qfr �6A � \ '��\- a" I . � � o � v �' 835� � . � o�+ r .+ ..� f: i' ., e a n m / . /C N W �n f1 ` "L� I V O � O \ : . 1.. �W O Z � � • O J M+ � o e+ a : � . � �� : ---�77 ` \\, /6�.y \ . — `..;—;' `/' . \.\�� \\ \ p�§y Q 9 Y � r, L � N � \\�\\'\\ \\\\ , P � m 1 \ � \Q/��9e. � � \N N �� O � R � � � \�' \��\ � O O � � oi � n S �+ �\ 7p '__'�085- - �\ /b/4 \� \ _ _- � � . �A + m : � y � � , � �H n� � G O N M (a2 v 7c r. � � O � ' �y s� .. a � � .. M .T �j. • p0 �� C r �J W e� \ �n -0 f=� , > > , Z 3 •�� , g � ; ^' �;" �.A � � � y q 7 e► . Oi � •a r. � ,tZ� s� e�, a '••'` 33 .. — �c s c n � 6. 4 eC a r p S \:'` � ■O e►O � �$ � ; q 7 �t er 7 � w t0 � ~ � R y ^ . `'•O7i Z..... _ W +� s0 w � ^ w � ' � � . 9 �I;� II . ?) M� p � S 1�: j. �� w.+ p � . . � ,� ,'T ►r. M� A � < " � � '^ ` STATE �--//C-,I�YqY lUO. !oo � oe o � :� +� " Y 7 4 � O' ^ ' C O � � '�° � � U ff .�.A �_ 1 = O � � � •O �� p�1 Q N ' � �/� � � v.T C V• • - N! M ` � n • w. •°c �- � 0 • • a- O � , r + i� y !► . � � ` \ i � March 17, 1980 T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Mike Milter, Planning and Redevelopr�nt Coordinator SUBJECT: Set Date for lnformal Public Hearing -� P.U.D. 28 � Pondwood Office Park The firm of Witliam S. Petersen, Architects, have made application for "General Plan without Concept Plan Approval" for a Planned Un�t Develop- ment locafed on a parcel of land 3.71 acres in area at 50Q0 Olson Memortal Highway. Pians call for development of an offlce p�rk on the stte in question. Due to the fact that the City Council has requested a meeting with the Planning Commission on Monday, April 14, 1g80, I would suggest that . the Planning Commission set a date of April 28, 1980 for an tnformal public hearing on this matter. • � March 18, 1980 T0: Golden Valley Planning Commission FROM: Mike Miller, Planning � Redevelopment Coordinator SUBJECT: Preliminary Ptat Review - Golden Valley Development BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The Gittleman Corporation is proposing to subdivide and plat 23.8 acres of land between 6000 and 6100 Glenwood Avenue. The property is bounded on the north by Glenwood Avenue, pn the east by the MN � S Railroad, on the south by Laurel Avenue, and on the west by a single family neighborhood that f ronts on Brunswick Avenue South. Part of the proposed plat, Lots 1 and 2, Block l , has already been proposed for developrr�nt of a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D. 27) involving the eventual development of 108 �ondominium units on approximately 11 .3 acres - of land. This proposal was reviewed by the Planning Commission for Concept Approval on March 10, 1980, and subsequently recommended for approval by the City Council . • The remainder of the land to be platted will be subdivided into 17 individual single family lots. According to the facts provided to this office, it is the intent of Gerald Nesland to develop the streets, utilities, and single family lots within the northerly portion of the plat. In turn, the Gittleman Corporation will be responsible for developing the P.U.D. portion of the plat. The proponent has also indicated that they are willi� to dedicate to the City a strip of land 50 feet in depth from the center Qf the creek which traverses the prpperty in a northeasterly direction. This would provide a strip of land 100 feet in width along the course of the creek which could be used for part of the City trail system, as well as natural protection for this important drainage system. The single family lot portion of the proposed plat has been revised from the general concept design displayed at the March 10, 1980 Planning Commission meeting. Due to certain grading and drainage problems, the cul-de-sac street in the southwesterly portion of the single family portion of the subdivision has been eliminated. With a minor realignment of the street system, the plat will still provide the same number of single family lots. The proposed plat, as revised, has been reviewed by the City Engineer, and he has recommended approval . Since the proposed plat borders on a County-State Aid Highway (No. 40 - Glenwood Avenue) State law requPres that Hennepin County review and approve the plat. The Hennepin County Department of Transportation has reviewed the plat � and found it acceptable with consideration of certain conditions which are listed in the attached letter. March 18, 1980 � Prelimina ry Plat Review - Golden Valley Development Page 2 Access to the southern portion of the plat (P.U.D. 27) will be via Laurel Avenue. The proponent has agreed to dedicate the additional land needed for right-of-way for construction of Laurel Avenue along the south boundary of the proposed ptat. It is the intent of the Engineering Department to . construct Laurel Avenue west from Turner's Crossroad to Colorada Avenue during the 1982 construction season. Design work for the street, railroad crossing, and storm sewer system associated with this project is currently underway. Laurel Avenue will be constructed with a standard 44 foot width including curb and gutter. The area proposed for p1atting is currently zoned Residential , and has been suggested for medium to low density residentiat development. RECOMMENDATION A careful review of the preliminary plat of Golden Valley Development by both the City Engineering Departrt�nt and the Planning Staff indicates that the proposed plat is in conformance with the City Subdivision Platting Ordinance. The suggested lot and street tayout provides for a reasonabte land use development for a single family neighborhood, Therefore, I would recommend that the Planning Commission;give favorable consideration to the preliminary plat of Golden Valley Development, subject to the conditions • � recommended by the Hennepin County Department of Transportation. The Planning Commission should also take into consideration the land dedication along the creek, and the necessary right-of-way for Laurel Avenue. . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIC�N ��"'"��°�� 320 Washington Av. South =� - � � � � :- ��P Hopkins, Minn¢sota 55343 A'NeS� HENNEPIN 935-3381 February 28, 1980 Mr. Michael Miller Planning & Development Coordinator City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Dear Mr. Miller: RE Proposed Plat - "Golden Valley Development" CSAH 40 LJest of MN & S RR Section 4, Township 117, Range 21 • Hennepin County Plat No 812 Review and Recorranendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found it acceptable with consideration of these conditions: - The developer should dedicate an additional 7 ft. of right of way making the right of way 40 ft. from the center of CSAH 40 (Glenwood Avenue). - The existing access near the N.E. corner of the plat must be closed. - The �►rofiosed street access points must receive formal ap�roval in the form of an approved Hennepin County entrance permit. See our Traffic Division for entrance permit forms. - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our _ Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. • Sincerely, � �� i.- ames M. wo�d, P.E. HENNEPIN COUNTY Chi ef, P1 anni ng & Programmi ng an equal opportunity¢mployer JMW/LDW:de � --��ENw�000 AvEN�.t � � � - � -- - 689 .o t m °° ; s° � �- ess � � � —�� n-I �� ,, � , B 3 ,� x � ; m -. � � ; z � � � _ p � � , T � C � � ----; W 1 p � � � � i � _� � o E � ` � �i a ; � � Q �" i � i Q .�j '' -- � � _ _--;� � � -- � a /' �� , � � ' � Q $ �,� � � � � � Q � ; ° �, ; __ N �, , ��, e � .. --- ' , y � i �i r y �� ,, �b� i 80 � � � eti v � C P � »� � �$ •' i r{--� � .t i Id ' '� / � i� m �✓ / 4f �% G C � � � � �i� N' � .� 46` /� I � i I �� / 1 � � � /� �� i / , �-;� a- �,� �. ,� ,p � .- ,. � � , , '� � _\ 4 �i � �� / � � i1 /�'//' �Z � 2 p � R7 � ;' �,/ t'E+ � � • n, ''/ / � � �i� �/ � •O� ' /' . � O � �1 � f � ' 1 1 . �� ,,\ � j � 1 � .{� i �. ,,� %�' ' 1 . M 0. �� \� ( ts � '' � , "�� '� � ! a � � v W r'` � � � � �° �� : � �� , . � � . � i �� " � � r : i . ,_,.r JI � � �� O`J � � �� / � W � � /� I I j / � , � ' / / � ;' � � � � � � / � � � � � i � � � ' � . % C � � / / �' / / � � � N / . � i - / . • ' / � � `' I i �� 1 i �� 7� �4�5 � a � AVENUE _ ; ; s LAURE� � __ __ _ _ -- — � March 17, 1980 T0: Golden Val.ley Ptanning Commission FROM: Mike Miller, Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator SUBJECT: Oiscussion and Final Review of Draft Zoning Ordinance Arr�ndment Since this item was postponed from the March 10, 1980 Planning Commission meeting, you will have an additional period of time to review the draft for the Terminal Warehouse District. A copy of the draft was included with your March 10 Planning Commission Agenda. If any Commission member should need an additional copy of the draft amendment please contact my office prior to the March 24 Planning Commission Meeting. It would be appreciated if the Planning Cort�nission could complete its review of this ordinance amendrr�nt on March 24. � �