Loading...
12-10-64 PC Minutes ��� REGULAR MEETING OF THE - GOLDEN VAL�EY PLANNING COMMISSION December 10, 1964 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission was held on Thursday, December 10, 1964 at 7:30 P.M. at the Golden Valley Civic Center , 7$00 Golden Valley' Road, Golden Valley, Minn. President Brown presided and the fol1owing members were present : Pennock, Van Hauer, Jensen, Senstad, Raugland, Bedwell , Hetman, Straw, tynch, and Discher , Also present were Sorensen , Skar�, Phyltis Jordahl and John Voss. ' It was moved by Jensen and seconded by Van Hauer to approve the minutes as mailed. The motion carried unanimously. PLATS A. Street Vacation ( 19) 2340 Valders Avenue Committee Chairman Bedwetl read the following report. "i�rs . R . C . Bluem requests vacation of Valders Avenue north of Wynwood Road. At the I�ovember , 1964 meeting , the Long Range Committee recommended that this petition be considered by the Plat Committee at its December meeting at which time the owner of Parcel 3400 be present, A plan should be worked out for access ta this property sir�ce one of the remaining access points woutd be eliminated by this vacation. If this can be accompla;shed by way of Jonellen Lane, Valders Avenue shcu ld be vacated. The Plat Committee felt that an adequate turn-around could not be devetoped on the Hollenbeck property . The Plat Committee feels that there isn� t any reason for Valders to go north through this property. The north extension on the A. H. Hallenbeck property (Parcel 3400) was intended to represent the frontage on a public street for this parcel - 12.02 - 20 - should this parcel be divided. The �1at Committee recommends that the proposed vacation - 25 foot strip between Lots il , Block 2, Richland Hi11s Second Addition and Lots 4, 61ock 3, Jone1len Terrace - be approved. 7he Committee was unanimous in its recommendation.�� It was moved by Bedwell and seconded by Raugland that the following be added to the Ptat Cornmittee report : The P1atCing Committee recommends approva1 of the vacation subject to the granting of the utility easement . The motion carried unanimously. It was moved by Hetman and seconded by Raugland to accept the Committee report and recommend approval of this vacation. The motion carried unanimously. B. McInnis Addition (9) Pat McInnis Committee Chairman Bedwell read the following report : �'The petitioner, Pat �1cInnis, was present. fi Mi�utes of the G V Planning Commission 12- 10-64 Page 2 ��;� This plat consists of four lots ranging in size from 12,540 square feet to 79,500 square feet. Lots 1 and 2 have a grade of approximately 54� drop. Lots 3 and 4 have 40� front setback in order to meet the min- imum 100� width required at the front setback line-3.04,3.�5, 3. 11 . These lots are large enough so that this in no way impairs their buitdable areas and furthermore the dweliing to the east is setback more than 60� providing a graduating setback to the dwelling on the west which are setback 35',� The Plat Committee unanimously recommends approval of this plat.�' The petitioner , Pat McInnis , was present . It was moved by Pennock and seconded by Senstad to accept the committee re port and recommend approval of this plat. The motion carried unanimously. C . 7500 Olson Highway ( 17) Skyline Builders Committee Chairman Bedwell read the following report : "Skyline Builders propose a five lot plat called Skyline Plaza. These lots coincide with the bouddaries of the recent rezonings of this area. The proposed ptat shows a 50� right-of-way for Quebec Avenue and 5th Avenue North where the Planning Gommission had recommended a 60� right- of-�ay in October , 19b4. A 50� right-of-way, however , appears adequate for two reasons : a. A 36 ' wide pavement, which is the widest expected on these streets could easily be developed on the 50� right-of-way. b. With a 36� wide pavement , there would be 7 ' of right-of-way on each side which appears adequate. The drainage pattern for this p1at is being worked out between their engineer , Bill Dolan, and t'he Village Engineering Department . The Village Engineer reports that this has been resolved to the extend that action can be taken on the preliminary plat . The Plat committee recommends approval of the Plat providing the praponent petitions for sidewalks along the proposed streets to be constructed at the time the streets are hard-surfaced, The committee was unanimous in its recommendation .�� The s�rveyor from Do1en Engineering was;:�.present. It was moved by Lynch and seconded by Pennock to accept the committee� s repor� and to recommend approval of a 14 foot side yard waiver along the proposed 5th Ave. for the dwelling on Lots 7 and 8, Block 1 of the Cottage Grove Addition. The motion carried unanimously. D. 2300 Lee Avenue (5) Robert Hughes - Spruce 3rd Addition Committee Chairman Bedwell read the following report : "The petitioner , Robert Hughes, was present . � ��w ,. Minutes of the G V Planning Commission 12- 10-64 Page 3 This plat has six large lots meeting ali Village Platting Require- ments . The 25 � dedication for Lee Avenue along the east edge of the property is acceptable to the Committee. The Plat Committee unanimously recommends approval of this plat reaffirming its recommendation of May, 1964, The discrepancy along the north boundary of the property has not been resolved but the Committee recommends that tot 1 be held in obeyence and building permit not be issued until the north boundary � iCtE is determined.k' The petitioner , Robert l�ughes, �as present. It was moved by Jensen and seconded by Senstad to accept the committee report and recommend approvat of the plat. The moti�n carried unanimously. ZONING A. 2531 Douglas Drive ( 14) Emelia Johnson Committee Chairman Straw read the following report: , '�The petitioner requests a rezoning from Open Development to Commerciat of the property at 2531 Douglas Drive in order to construct a dairy store and service station on this corner. After a physicat of this property in June of tg64, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that this area be rezoned from Open Development to Residential . Several of the lots in the area were rezoned to Residential at that time. The Zoning Committee unanimously recommends to reaffirm the position taken at that time and recommends denial of this petition, �' The petitioner was represented by Bob Baldwin and her two sons. It was moved by Bedwell and seconded by Raugland to accept the committee report and recommend deniai of this petition. The motion carried with 7 ayes and l nay. B. 595� Golden Valley Road ( 11 ) A1 Fisher Committee Chairman Straw read the following report : "The petitioner requests a rezoning of a two acre parcel west of Oak Grove School from �pen Development to Multip1e Dwelling (M- 1 ) . The petitioner , Mr. Reininger, was present at the committee meetings in November and December . He is proposing a two story 14 unit apartment buildir�g to be located on the high level portion of the lot with access to the proposed Oak Grove Circle. The Zoning Committee unanimously recommends denial of the rezoning . . It was felt that a large apartment building located on the h��gh level area of this lot would not be compatibte with the residential development on Oak Grov� Circle. ���� � Minutes of the G V Planning Commission 12- 10-6� Page 4 The petitioner was represented by Mr . Reininger . It was moved by Netman and seconded by Pennock to accept the Committee report and recommend denial of the rezoning . The motion carried unanimously. C . 8735 Olson Highway (22 ) National Funds The petitioner withdrew, therefore no action was taken on the committee report . �. 7731 Sixth Avenue North ( 17) Dahlberg Electronics The petitioner withdrew, therefore no action was taken on the committee report . ORDINANCE A. 9200 Wayzata Boulevard (23 ) General Mills Committee Chairman Senstad read the following report: �'The petition is for a waiver of Sections 7.04 of the Zoning Code. The petitioner desires a waiver of 91 ' to a height of 131 ' for a ten story building to be erected adjacent and west of the existing General Mills building at the N E quadrant of Co, Rd. 18 and Wayzata Boulevard . Findings or Remarks o ar s � p runs with the land. 2 . The tract in question is approximatel � 90 acres in extent, abut�ing two major highways . 3. Multiple dwellings are now permitted to eight stor�es in height in Golden Valley. 4. Section 4.04 (a-2 ) reads : (For Multiple Dwellings ) That high apartment buildings must have side yards at 1east equal to their height. 5. The Committee feels that this project will be a decided asset to the Village. 6. The Committee feels that the Zoning Code should be re- examined by the Ordinance and Long Range Committees with regard to higher structures. The Ordinance Committee recommends approval of the petition stip- ulating that Village Ordinances and Regulations be complied with . in all other respects. �� General Mills was represented by their Chief Engineer , Mr . Schmelzer . It was� moved by Straw and seconded by Jensen to accept the committee report and recommend approval of the waiver. The motion carried � � unanimQUSly. � B. Revision of Residential District - Chapter 3 - Zoning Code. Committee Chairman Senstad read the following p�oposed revision of Chapter 3 - Residential Zoning District . � 1 �„ Minutes of the G V Planning Commission 12- 10-64 Page 5 3. Residential Zoning District 3. 01 Residentia1 Zoning Districts are hereby established as fo1lows : (See text of Village Code) 3 .02 The following uses and no others sha11 be permitted inthe Residential District : 1 . Country Estates and one-family dwellings : except that two family dwellings shall be permitted on lots which - a. Directly abutt a heavier use district, or b. Are directly across a street from a Commercial , Light Industrial or Industrial District. 2. Inconspicuous real estate signs and "for-sale�� signs, relating to the property upon which they are located, and of not more than 4 square feet in area; 3. Rental of rooms to not more than two people for todging � purposes only. 4. Name Plates not exceeding 1 square foot in area. 5. Accessory bui1dings , such as defined in Section 12 .02 of the Zoning Code, 3,03 No land shall be platted or subdivided nereafter so as to create any lot of a width less than 100 feet, at the minimum required front building setback line, and an area of less than 12 ,500 square feet; provided, however , that in cases of unusual topography or the unusual curving of the street fronting any lot , or the unusual shape of lots, the Vil1age Councit may, in its d�i:scretion, approve a plat or subdivision containing 1ots of greater or less width or a gre�ter or less width or a greater or smaller area. a. The provisions of Section 3 . 03 hereof shall have no application to plats dedicated to the Viltage and accepted by the Villa�ev.Council prior to April 4, 195�. 3. 04 In the Open Development and Residential Zoning Districts a lot or premises of a rninimum area of 12,500 square feet (and a minimum width of 100 feet at the minimum requireel front setbac� � line) shall be required for on�: family housed in one building. 3 .0�� �ra the Open Development and Residentia1 Zoning Districts a 1ot or premises of a nimimum area of 18, 750 square feet (and a minimum width of 150 feet at the minimum required front building setback line) shall be r�quired for two families housed in or�e building. No more than two kitchen areas shall be permitted in any two-family dwelling. Minutes of the G V Planning Commission 12- 10-b4 Page 6 * ��� �� 3 . 042 Whenever from and after February 1 , 1956, the title to any lot or premises not compiying with the above minimum requirements, becomes merged with the title to a contiguous lot or premises, whether the tenancy be joint , individual , or in common, and such merger creates a lot or premises complying with the above requirements, or creates a tot or premises more nearly comply- ing with the above requirements, after such merger of title, no building permit shall be grant�d to any person who requests a building permit for a sma1ler lot or premises than that created by the merger of title. This section s��11 not apply to land conveyed or property described by metes and bounds; the provisions of Section 14 of the Platting Regulations shall apply to such land, Land conveyed or described by reference to all or part of an Auditor ' s Subdivision or all or part of a Registered Land Survey shall be deemed to be conveyed or described by metes and bounds . When, in the opinion of the Building Inspector , the applicant for a building permit for a lot or premises covered by the provisions of this section shall agree to comply with plans or conditions designed to effectively achieve the objectives of this Section, the Building Inspector may, with the written approval of the Vi1lage Manager and of the Village Engineer , issue a bui1ding permit without reference of the applic ation to the Planning Commission or Village Counci1 . Every application for a building permit for premises which may be subject to the provisions 6f this Section shall be accompanied by an up-to-date Abstract of Title, Registered Property Abstract, or Certificate or Memorandum of Tit1e containing sufficient information to indicate whether or not said premises are subject to the provisions of this Section. 3.�5 Unplatted Property: The fol1owing provi�ons shall apply to unp1atted property: 1 . No dwelling or accessory building shall be erected for use or occupancy as a residential dwelling on any tract of unp1atted land which does not conform �ith the requirements of Section 3.04 of the Zoning Code. 2. Where land is platted into building lots, no building shall be erected on the adjoining unplatted land nearer than 75 feet; and in no case shall any building be erected on a tract of unplatted land, whether adjoin�ng platted land or not, closer than 15 feet to the side lot line or closer than 5 feet to the rear lot line of the tract on which said building is to be 1ocated except as this Chapter otherwise provides �or accessory buildi�gs . 3.06 CHANGE OF AREAS RESTRICTED: The open space surrounding any building now existing or hereafter erected� shall not be so reduced or �minished by either enlarging the structures or by disposing of land, that either the setbacks, the lot width or the lot area sha11 be smaller than required by the provisions of this ordinance, �iLr �^ Minutes of the G V Planning Commission 12- 10-64 Page 7 3. 07 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: The following building setbacks sha11 be required in the Residential Zoning District: 1 . Front Setback : The requir�ci front setback shall be 35 feet from the front property line and 35 feet from any side property 1ine which is also a street line, but this require- ment shall not reduce the bui1ding width of any corner 1ot to less than 20 feet at the ground story level . 2. Rear Setback : The required rear setback shall be 20% of the lot depth; 3. Side Setback: The distance between any part of a dwelling or structure and the side lot lines sha11 be gaverned by the foilowing requirements : - a. In the case of lots having a width of 100 feet or greater , the side setback shail be 15 f�et. - b. In the case of lots having a width greater than 70 f�et and less than 100 feet , the side setbaek shall be 15% of the lot width. c. In the case of tots having a width of 70 feet or less, the North or West side setback shall be 10% of the lot width, and the South or East side setback sk�all be 20% of the 1ot width. 3. 08 No building or other structure shali be used, erected or maintained within 75 feet of the North line of Sections 29 � 3�, Township 118, Range 21 (commonly known as the center line of Medicine Lake Road, between Douglas Drive � Co. Rd. 18) . 3 . �9 CORNER VISIBILITY: Between the right-of-way lines of inter- secting streets and a tine joining points on such lines 25 ft. distant from their point of inter�ection , or in the case of a rounded corner, the point of intersecti�n of the tangents, no building or structure may be erected and no vegetation, other than shade trees trimed up a distance of at least 10 feet above the curb line, may be maintained above a height of three feet above the plane through their curb grades , far the purpose of corner visibility. 3. 10 CORNICES AND EAVES : Cflrnices and eaves may not project more than thirty inches into a required open space or setback. 3. 11 HEIGHT LIMITATIONS : t�o building shall be erected in the Residential Zoning District to exceed 22 stories i� height. 3. 12 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS : Accessory buildings as defined in Section 12.02 of the Zoning Code sha11 be governed by the foliowing requirements : 1 , Detached accessory buildings shall be located wholly to the rear of the house or main bui1ding to which it is incidental , with at least 20 fe�t of separation between the main building and the accessory building or buildings . Minutes of the G V Planning Commission 12- 10-64 Fage 8 ��•� Whe� so p1aced, the accessory building or bui1dings shall be no less than 5 feet distant from any lot boundary line other than s street line and no tess than 35 feet distant from a lot boundary tine which is also a street line. 2. Garages or other accessory structures which are attached to the house or main structure shall be governed by setback require- ments of this ordinance which pertain to the main structure a�d not the setback requirements of Section 3. 141 as shown above. 3 , No bailding permit sha11 be issued with respect to the main .structure for a single family dwelling, not having a garage unless the registered survey submitted at the time of the application for the building permit is made ref1ects the necessary amount of space for the location of a garage, which will meet the setbacks and other requirements of this section. ' 4. Garaging for at least two or more �utomobites shall be constru�ted and provided at the time that a two famiiy dwelling is constructed. The Ordinance Committee unanimously recommends the preceeding revision of Chapter 3 - Residential Zon�ng District. " It was moved by Pennock and seconded by Senstad to accept the Ordinance Committee report. The motion carried unanimously. LONG RANGE A. Street Vacation (8) 4216 Poplar Drive - Ardmore Drive Committee ChaciRman Pennock read the following report: �'The ptitioner , Raymond Lesch was presenfi. The p@t1tlOCt is for a vacation� of Poplar Drive from the east tine of the west one-half of �.ot 2, Glenwood Addition to Ardmore Drive. The vacation of this area woutd not alter the existing situation since Poplar Drive is developed only up to this point from Meadow Lane. It would be difficult to extend poplar Dri�: to Ardmore because of the 20% grade over the area to be vacated. A turn around is not provided for at the end of Poptar Drive at the present time. This could not be accomplished on the area to be vacated because of the steep grade. A turn around could be developed on Lot C of RLS 929 by way of condemnation but it would not be practical due to the 1ocation of the structures on this lot. The Long Range Committee unanimousty recommends approval provided a 10' easem+�nt for the watermain located through the vacated property is given to the Viltage.+� The Petitioner , Mr . Lesch was present. It was moved by Lunch and seconded by Raugland to accept the committee report and recommend approval of the vacation. The motion carried unanimously. 2��a Minutes of the G V Planning Commission 12- 10-64 Page 9 ADMINISTRATIVE A. Lot Divisions Approved by the Staff 16. Joe Pazandak 2130 Douglas Drive It was moved by Jensen and seconded by Hetman to recommend approval of a lot division at 2130 Douglas Drive and to waiver the Platting Regulations by resotution of the P1anning Commission. The motion carried unanimous1y. B. Review of Planning Commission By-Laws It was moved by Jensen and seconded by Senstad to accept the proposed changes in the Plann���g Commission By-Laws as mailed in the December Agenda. The motion carried unanimousty. C . 1965 Program Chairman Brown read the program made by the Ptanner for 1965. D. Appointment Qf Nominating Committee It was moved by Pennock and seconded by Hetman to have the Ptanning Commission President , Joe Brown, select a nominating committee for the offices of President and Vice President of the Planning Commission for 1965 . The motion carried unanimously. A motion was entertained for adjournm�nt at 10:45 P.M. � �. �--° J n S . Voss P anning Director ��,r � Dz:��'�s� ' �_ � 6`� Jo L. Brown, President 1