02-27-84 PC Minutes1
MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION
February 27, 1984
A regular meeting of the Planniny Commission was held in the Council Chambers
of the Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota,
Vice Chairman Forster called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Those present were Commissioners Forster, Prazak, Singer and Tubman.
Commissioners Leppik and Polachek were absent.
Also present were Mike Miller, Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator and Alda
Peikert, Assistant Planner,
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 13, 1984
It was moved by Commissioner Prazak, seconded by Commissioner Tubman and
carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the February 13, 1984 Planniny
Commission meeting as recorded.
II. SET DATE FOR INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: Undestad Investment Company
LOCATION: 5530 and 5612 Wayzata Boulevard
REQUEST: Approval of a six-story office building and a
four level parking ramp in a Commercial Zoning
District
Vice Chairman Forster introduced this agenda item and noted the staff recom-
mendation of a March 12, 1984 informal public hearing date.
It was moved by Commissioner Singer, seconded by Commissioner Prazak and
carried unanimously to set an informal public hearing date of March 12, 1984
for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit requested by Undestad Investment
Company to allow construction of a six-story office building at 5530 and 5612
Wayzata Boulevard in a Commercial Zoning District.
Commissioner Tubman asked whether the subject site is within the area recom-
mended at the February 13, 1984 Planning Commission meeting for a development
moratorium. Vice Chairman Forster confirmed that the site is within the
recommended moratorium area and asked how the application should be handled
considering the recommended moratorium. Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator
Mike Miller stated that the application was received February 13, 1984, the
date of the last Planning Commission meeting. The application is in process
prior to adoption of a development moratorium and must, therefore, be allowed
to complete the Conditional Use Permit procedure. Mr. Miller informed
Planning Commissioners that the City Council on February 21, 1984 directed the
City Attorney to draw up a Moratorium Ordinance and set a public hearing date
of March 22, 1984.
~I
Planning Commission Meeting - February 27, 1984 -2-
Commissioner Prazak asked whether the Conditional Use Permit request should be
reviewed as if there were no moratorium pending. Mr. Miller stated that the
Planning Commission and City Council should be aware of the pending moratorium
and that the possible moratorium could enter into consideration of the
Conditional Use Permit request.
Commissioner Tubman asked whether the applicant has been notified of the
possible moratorium. Mr. Miller replied that the applicant was informed of
consideration of a moratorium prior to the February 13, 1984 Planning
Commission meeting at which it was discussed.
III. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT
APPLICANT: Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Company
LOCATION: 7000 Wayzata Boulevard
REQUEST: Approval of an amendment to Conditional Use
Permit No. 82-2 for operation of a car rental
business in an Industrial Zoning District
Vice Chairman Forster introduced this agenda item and requested a staff expla-
nation of this Conditional Use Permit amendment request as one of four related
informal public hearing items all initiated by the same applicant.
Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator Mike Miller used graphics prepared by
the proponent to review the three Conditional Use Permit amendment requests
associated with two sites on the west and east sides of Louisiana Avenue at
Highway 12. The graphics consist of site plans illustrating three phases of
development for the Louisiana Avenue sites: Site Plan I depicting current
conditions, Site Plan II illustrating conditional uses proposed for an interim
period until I-394 construction, and Site Plan III showing changes planned
following I-394 construction. As background explanation of current con-
ditions, Mr. Miller reviewed complaints concerning failure to comply with con-
ditions of the existing Conditional Use Permits. As explanation of the interim
period, Mr. Miller reviewed the second site plan which illustrates proposed
conditional uses for the 6980 and 7000 Wayzata Boulevard sites and also indi-
cates plans for construction of a body shop on Lupient property to the north.
Mr. Miller stated that the proposed body shop is a conditional use and would
require appearance before the Planning Commission as a Conditional Use Permit
application. As explanation of the changes proposed following I-394 construc-
tion, Mr. Miller reviewed the third site plan which indicates removal of the
two structures on the Conditional Use Permit sites, thus illustrating the tem-
porary nature of the requested conditional uses. The ultimate plan includes
construction of an office warehouse on additional Lupient property to the
north, and Mr. Miller noted that this would be a permitted use not requiring
Planning Commission and Council action. Mr. Miller added that there is the
possibility of inclusion of a gas station on the northerly portion of the 6980
Wayzata site following I-394 construction.
1
Planning Commission Meeting - February 27, 1984 -3-
Following explanation of the three site plans illustrating current, interim
and future uses of the Lupient properties in the Louisiana area, Mr. Miller
explained specific amendments proposed to Conditional Use Permit No. 82-2 for
the car leasing operation at 7000 Wayzata Boulevard and reviewed the conditions
of approval recommended by staff. Mr. Miller stated that all recommended con-
ditions were reviewed with the proponent except the condition concerning remo-
val or proper filling of unused gasoline tanks at this time as specified by
City and State Fire Codes.
Vice Chairman Forster recognized Mr. Steve Swartz, Attorney for Jim Lupient,
who spoke for the proponent. Mr. Swartz stated that the history of the matter
as reviewed by the City Planner was essentially accurate and that he wished to
add only a few things. Mr. Swartz stated that there were two uncertainties at
the time of the original Conditional Use Permit approval which have resulted
in changes: I) Plans for a building addition to accommodate a diesel repair
facility were abandoned, and 2) plan adjustments are required in anticipation
of I-394 construction. It was the suggestion of the City Planner that Jim
Lupient prepare new plans for the Louisiana sites to reflect these changes.
In response to that suggestion, Jim Lupient retained Albitz Design to prepare
new plans. Mr. Swartz introduced Mr. Kyle Johnson, Albitz Design, who was
present and available to answer design questions.. Mr. Swartz continued with
the point that the. three Conditional Use Permits requested for amendment will
be only three to five years in duration and that the conditional uses defini-
tely constitute an interim plan. Mr. Swartz concluded with the request that
the recommended condition of approval pertaining to removal or filling of
unused gasoline tanks be stated in terms of compliance with City and State
Fire Codes rather than in terms of specific procedure. This would give the
proponent the opportunity to review Code requirements and alternate means of
compliance.
In response to an inquiry from Vice Chairman Forster, Mr. Miller indicated
that he has no objection to modification of the condition as requested.
Mr. Swartz stated that he also wished to comment on the first recommended con-
dition of approval stipulating landscaping of 35 foot setbacks from streets
unless variances are granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Mr. Swartz
informed Planning Commissioners that the proponent intends to make application
to the BZA for the required variances.
Mr. Swartz introduced Mr. Jim Lupient and Mr. Tom Morris, Jim Lupient
Oldsmobile Company, who were present and available to answer questions.
Commissioner Forster asked Mr. Lupient about final stage plans for use of the
sites following I-394 construction. Mr. Lupient and Mr. Kyle Johnson, Albitz
Design, stated that the plans are based on information received from the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Mr. Johnson added the infor-
mation that all areas shown in grey on the site plans represent new blacktop
for areas currently finished with gravel and that the new blacktop will pro-
vide a cleaner look for the whole property.
1
Planning Commission Meeting - February 27, 1984 -4-
Commissioner Prazak commented that he is pleased to see the access to the
property moved back from the Highway 12 service road.
Vice Chairman Forster opened the informal public hearing for public input.
There was no one present who wished to speak on this item, and Vice Chairman
Forster closed the informal public hearing.
It was moved by Commissioner Prazak, seconded by Commissioner Singer and
carried unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the amendments
requested by Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Company to Conditional Use Permit No. 82-2
for operation of a car rental business at 7000 Wayzata Boulevard in an
Industrial Zoning District subject to the following conditions:
1. That the proponent provide landscaping on all sides of the site
facing a public street or highway to a depth of 35 feet from
the right-of-way line (Front Yard Setback) unless a variance is
granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals (BZA) altering all or
part of the required setback.
2. All existing underground gasoline storage tanks (except the one
serving the remaining gas pump) must be removed or modified in
accordance with City and State Fire Codes.. In addition, all
work done relative to the storage tanks must be inspected by
the City Fire Marshal before and after completion.
3. That the restriction on the number of automobiles parked on the
south and east of the structure be changed from 11 to 15 auto-
mobiles, with all remaining automobiles (rentals) to be parked
to the north of the structure as shown on the site plan.
4. Since an addition to the structure is no longer contemplated,
all references to "exterior building materials" should be
deleted from the permit.
5. All changes in the means of ingress and egress to the site
shall be in accordance with the approved, modified, site plan
made a part of this amended Conditional Use Permit.
IV. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT
APPLICANT: Lupient Leasing, Inc.
LOCATION: 6980 Wayzata Boulevard
REQUEST: Approval of an amendment to Conditional Use
Permit No. 82-3 for operation of a gasoline
service station in an Industrial Zoning District
Vice Chairman Forster introduced this agenda item and opened the meeting to
Commissioner questions of staff.
1
5
Planning Commission Meeting - February 27, 1984 -5-
Commissioner Prazak asked the reason for a condition stipulating location of
the propane tank considering the fact that the proponent is not required to
move the tank. Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator Mike Miller explained
that the propane tank was installed clandestinely and that the Conditional Use
Permit should have been amended to allow the installation. The recommended
condition recognizes the existing propane tank as a legitimate use under the
amended Conditional Use Permit.
Mr. Miller added that he recommends addition of a fifth condition of approval
identical to the first condition on the previous Conditional Use Permit amend-
ment specifying landscaping of 35 foot setbacks from the streets unless
variances are granted by the BZA.
Commissioner Prazak commented that the change in access included in proposed
amendments to this Conditional .Use Permit also seems to be an improvement.
Commissioner Singer noted that nothing has been done on landscaping in the two
years since issuance of the original Conditional Use Permit and asked whether
a time limit could be placed on installation of landscaping. Mr. Miller
stated that when building construction requiring Building Board of Review (BBR)
approval occurs, the BBR requires a bond to insure completion of landscaping
and that a bond could be required in this case as a condition of approval.
However, in the case of a Conditional Use Permit all improvements shown on the
site plan become a part of the Conditional Use Permit, and if improvements are
not completed within six months to one year, the City has the option of
revoking the Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Miller added that he was instructed
by the Acting City Manager to inform the proponent that whatever is stipulated
in the Conditional Use Permit must materialize and that it will be necessary
in the case of the amended Conditional Use Permits to take harsher action than
has been taken to date in dealing with noncompliance.
Vice Chairman Forster called on the proponent represented by Mr. Steve Swartz,
Attorney for Jim Lupient. Mr. Swartz stated that he has only one comment to
add and that it concerned the propane tank. Mr. Swartz stated that the pro-
pane tank was installed prior to the time Lupient Leasing took control of the
property. According to Mr. Swartz, the proponent considered moving the tank,
but after consultation with the City Fire Marshal, it was decided that the
current location is best.
Vice Chairman Forster asked the proponent the time frame for proposed improve-
ments to the property. Mr. Swartz stated that work will begin this spring.
Vice Chairman Forster opened the informal public hearing for public input.
There as no one present who wished to speak on this item, and Vice Chairman
Forster closed the informal public hearing.
Commissioner Prazak commented that in view of the limited life span of the
proposed conditional use, he is pleased to see the proposed improvements.
Commissioner Singer agreed that it would be a shame to make further additions
for the few years prior to I-394 construction.
1
Planning Commission Meeting - February 27, 1984
-6-
It was moved by Commissioner Singer, seconded by Commissioner Tubman and
carried unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the amendments
requested by Lupient Leasing, Inc. to Conditional Use Permit No. 82-3 for
operation of a gasoline service station at 6980 Wayzata Boulevard in an
Industrial Zoning District subject to the following conditions:
1. Vehicle parking on site shall be restricted to those areas
designated for parking on the amended approved site plan only.
2. The westernmost entrance on the south side of the property
shall be closed and filled with proper landscaping materials
so that it could in no way be reopened unless otherwise
approved as a further amendment to this permit.
3. The propane storage tank shall be allowed to remain where it
is presently located on the site plan along the south boundary
of the property in a location that is preferred by the City
Fire Marshal.
4. Violation of any condition placed on this permit or any other
subsequent violations of the Zoning Ordinance relative to this
property shall be grounds for the City Council to consider
revocation of this Conditional Use Permit.
5. That the proponent provide landscaping on all sides of the
site facing a public street or highway to a depth of 35 feet
from the right-of-way line (Front Yard Setback) unless a
variance is granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA)
altering all or part of the required setback.
V. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT
APPLICANT: Lupient Leasing, Inc.
LOCATION: 6980 Wayzata Boulevard
REQUEST: Approval of an amendment to Conditional Use
Permit No. 82-4 for operation of a "U-Haul"
truck and trailer rental business in an Industrial
Zoning District
Vice Chairman Forster introduced this agenda item and opened the meeting to
Commissioner questions of staff.
Commissioner Prazak asked why the two Conditional Use Permits for the 6980
Wayzata Boulevard location are not handled as a single Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Prazak speculated that it might be due to the possibility of a
split decision on the two uses. Planning and Redevelopment Coordinator Mike
Miller stated that it is preferable to issue separate Conditional Use Permits
1
Planning Commission Meeting - February 27, 1984
so that if the gasoline station s
business, separate conditions for
cable. Mr. Miller added that the
storage area recommended by staff
prepared by the proponent.
-7-
Would decide to discontinue the "U-Haul"
the gasoline station would remain appli-
change in location of the rental equipment
is incorporated into the revised site plan
Vice Chairman Forster recognized Mr. Steve Swartz, Attorney for Jim Lupient,
who was present to represent the proponent. Mr. Swartz stated that the
Conditional Use Permit amendment request is for the most part self explanatory.
Mr. Swartz informed the Planning Commission that at the time of the original
Conditional Use Permit approval, operators of the "U-Haul" rental business
intended to store equipment at another site and transfer rental equipment back
and forth as needed, but that this procedure proved to be impractical.
Therefore, Lupient Leasing now wishes to proceed with provision of a screened
storage area.
Commissioner Tubman commented that she can see the need for two parking stalls
for display purposes but agrees that all other rental equipment should be
screened.
It was moved by Commissioner Tubman, seconded by Commissioner Prazak and
carried unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve amendments
requested by Lupient Leasing, Inc. to Conditional Use Permit No. 82-4 for
operation of a "U-Haul" truck and trailer rental business at 6980 Wayzata
Boulevard in an Industrial Zoning District subject to the following conditions:
1. The operators of said business understand and agree not to
park any rental trucks and/or trailers within any parking area
designated for required off-street parking to be provided for
the service station use. only as quoted by the City Zoning
Ordinance and in accordance with the approved site plan.
2. Two parking stalls as shown on the approved site plan in the
southeast corner of the site may be reserved for U-Haul trucks
and/or trailers as a minimal display type situation. However,
all other rental trucks, trailers and any other equipment must
be placed at a location on the site and properly screened from
view from all sides. Note according to the site plan such a
screened storage area is proposed in the northeast corner of
the site. Staff would recommend that this U-Haul storage area
be moved down to the approximate east center of the property
north of the service station and in an area designated to be
paved asphalt for the parking of vehicles. This would move it
further away from the commercial restaurants up on the inter-
section of Market Street and Louisiana and would make it
closer with better access to the actual rental operation,
inasmuch as the remainder of that blacktop parking area is
designated to carry vehicles belonging to Jim Lupient
Oldsmobile Company.
1
Planniny Commission Meeting - February 27, 1984 -8-
3. Violation of any of the above conditions or any other appli-
cable requirements of the City Zoning Code shall be grounds
for revocation of the Conditional Use Permit.
VI. INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Company
LOCATION: 704 Pennsylvania Avenue South
REQUEST: Approval of an auto refinishing and recondi-
tioning facility within an Industrial Zoning
District
Vice Chairman Forster introduced this agenda item and asked for a report from
staff. Planniny and Redevelopment Coordinator Mike Miller pointed out that
this request is not an amendment of a previously granted Conditional Use
Permit as were the first three informal public hearing items, but is a request
for a new Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Miller stated that he had discussions
with a representative of the building owner, Possis Corporation, concerning
screening from residential development north of Laurel Avenue by means of
replacement of existing Russian Olive trees with evergreens and that addi-
tional smaller evergreens will be installed along Pennsylvania Avenue. Mr.
Miller said there is a possibility the City will acquire additional right of
way for widening of Laurel Avenue but that if any screening is removed, repla-
cement would be required. Mr. Miller stated that the proponent has agreed to
parking only on the asphalt and not on the grass. Mr. Miller reported that
the subject site was used for machinery repair in the past so that the propo-
sal does not represent a change in use. Mr. Miller concluded that if the pro-
ponent keeps the place.-clean and does not store an unusually large number of
cars on the site, the proposed use will be acceptable.
Commissioner Prazak asked the distance of the building from the south property
line. Mr. Miller replied that the building is one to-two feet from the pro-
perty line at the closest point and angles up to approximately eight feet from
the property line.
Vice Chairman Forster recognized Mr. Steve Swartz, Attorney for Jim Lupient,
who spoke on behalf of the proponent. Mr. Swartz pointed out that unlike the
locations of the previous Conditional Use Permit amendment requests, the sub-
ject property is not owned by the Lupient Companies, but is leased from Possis
Corporation. Concerning the recommended condition of approval stipulating
relocation of the blacktop parking area a minimum of 10 feet from the south
property line unless a variance is granted by the BZA, Mr. Swartz explained
that the proponent is adding only four paved parking stalls, all of which will
be located outside the required setback area. Mr. Swartz stated that the pro-
ponent does not wish to be responsible for removal of asphalt paving already
located within the required setback due to the fact that the proponent is only a
tenant in the building and plans to be there only temporarily until construction
1
1
1
9
Planning Commission Meeting - February 27, 1984
-9-
of a new body shop proposed for a different site is completed. Mr. Miller
stated that w henever a new use or new construction is proposed for a noncon-
forming site, the site should be brought up to Code. Mr. Miller agreed that
it would not be practical to tear up existing blacktop for the proposed use
and suggested that the matter sho uld properly be referred to the BZA.
Vice Chairman Forster opened the informal public hearing for public input.
Mr. Gordon Prchal, 421 Quebec Avenue South, asked the proposed use of the site
and whether the operation would include painting. Mr. Lupient stated that
there would be no body work or painting done at the subject site. The pro-
posed operation is motor mechanical reconditioning, not refinishing.
Commissioner Prazak added that there is the possibility of subleasing of some
office space. Mr. Swartz stated that Mr. Leo Martin of Anderson Cadillac is
expected to make application for use of the office space and that the proposed
office use would be a three person operation.
Commissioner Tubman asked whether notice was sent to surrounding property
owners. Mr. Miller confirmed that notice was sent to all property owners
within 5U0 feet of the subject property.
Vice Chairman Forster closed the informal public hearing.
Commissioner Prazak asked what is in the space between the building and Laurel
Avenue. Mr. Miller replied that the area is grass and provides a nice separa-
tion between the building and the residential properties to the north. Mr.
Miller added that the building owners are concerned with. maintaining an image.
Commissioner- Forster asked who would install the landscaping. Mr. Lupient
answered that Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Company would install the landscaping.
It was moved by Commissioner Prazak, seconded by Commissioner Singer and
carried unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the Conditional Use
Permit requested by Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Company for an automobile mechani-
cal reconditioning facility at 7U4 Pennsylvania Avenue South within an
Industrial Zoning District subject to the following conditions:
1. That the site be properly landscaped and maintained par-
ticularly with respect to the required screening along the
north property line separating the Industrial Zoning District
from the Residential Zoning District all in accordance with
the City Zoning Ordinance and City Landscape Standards.
2. The paved asphalt parking lot shall be the only location where
motor vehicles of any type can be parked whether they are
visiting or there for a lengthly stay and absolutely no parking
shall be allowed on any grass or sodded landscaped area.
1
~0
Planning Commission Meeting - February 27, 1984 -10-
3. If some of the smaller areas in the building should be
subleased for office space, the required parking for such
office space must be made up from the paved parking lot in
front of the building.
4. The parking lot must be moved to a point lU feet from the
nearest site lot line or a variance obtained from the Golden
Valley Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA).
5. Violation of any of the above conditions or any other provision
of the City Zoniny Code shall be grounds for the City Council
to consider revocation or suspension of this Conditional Use
Permit.
Following the action, Mr. Swartz and Mr. Lupient informed the Planning
Commission that neighboring residents attending the meeting but not speaking
during the public hearing asked them directly if the Russian Olive trees on
the site could be retained as pheasants feed in them in the winter. Mr.
Swartz and Mr. Lupient asked whether the Russian Olives could remain if the
proposed evergreen screening is also added. It was the consensus of the
Planning Commission that the proposed evergreen trees could be installed in
addition to the existing Russian Olive trees rather than as a replacement of
the Russian Olives so that the Russian Olives could be retained.
VII. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING - FEBRUARY 21, 1984
Commissioner Prazak provided the Planning Commission with a report on the
February 21, 1984 City Council meeting.
VIII. REPORT ON HRA MEETING - FEBRUARY 14, 1984
Assistant Planner Alda Peikert provided the Planning Commission with a report
on the February 14, 1984 meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(hRA).
IX. DISCUSSION OF NATIONAL APA CONFERENCE
Staff distributed to Planning Commissioners materials on the National American
Planning Association Conference scheduled for May 5-9, 1984 in the Twin Cities.
Planning Commissioners were informed that since the conference requires no
travel this year, the City would be able to pay for registration by all
Planning Commissioners wishing to attend.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Bill Forster, Vice Chairman Margaret Leppik, Secretary