Loading...
09-23-85 PC Minutes16~ MINUTES OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION September 23, 1985 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Manager's Conference Room of the Civic Center, .7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Vice Chairman Leppik called the meeting to order at 7:15 P.M. Those present were Commissioners Leppik, Lewis and McAleese. Those absent were Commissioners Kapsner, McCracken-Hunt, Prazak and Russell. Also present was Alda Peikert, City Planner. Vice Chairman Leppik deferred approval of the minutes of the September 9, 1985 Planning Commission meeting due to lack. of a quorum. I. REPORT ON BZA MEETING - SEPTEMBER 10, 1985 Commissioner Leppik provided the Planning Commission with a report on the September 10, 1985 meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). II. REPORT ON HOUSING SURVEY - LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Vice Chairman Leppik introduced Ms. .Virginia Levy, Golden Valley League of Women Voters, who presented a final report on the results of the League of Women Voters Housing Survey and on League recommendations. Following the presentation, Planning Commissioners discussed the survey results and Planning Commission consideration of the accessory housing issue. Commissioner McAleese asked that the next Planning Commission agenda include. preparation of a schedule for Planning Commission action on accessory housing, and Commissioner Leppik suggested that the agenda item include a review of the survey results and League recommendations by the fu11 Planning Commission. In the course of discussion of residential neighborhood acceptance of accessory apartments, Commissioners noted the availability of mediation services as a resource for settling neighborhood disputes. Commissioner McAleese reported on a mediation service to which he volunteers his time, and Commissioner Leppik reported that the League of Women Voters is sponsoring an October seminar on mediation services. Commissioner Leppik agreed to have literature on the League seminar sent to staff .for distribution to both Planning Commission and Human Rights Commission members. III. DISCUSSION - TURNER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Vice Chairman Leppik introduced this agenda item, and Planning Commissioners discussed both the proposed preliminary site plan for the project and portions of the text of the draft development agreement. The Planning Commissioners reached consensus on the following comments on the proposed preliminary site plan: Planning Commission Minutes September 23, 1985 Page 2 1. Two access points to the parking ramp are advisable in order to accommodate the number of cars. Rather than eliminating the access onto Turners Crossroad as recommended by staff, it is suggested that the Turners Crossroad drive be designated an exit only with a median strip to prohibit turns north toward the residential area. The exit should be located as far as feasible to the south away from the residential neighborhood. 2. Circulation between the parking ramp and a hotel entrance point for dropping off passengers and luggage appears cumbersome and requires clarification. 3. Provision for pedestrian crossings is essential from the hotel and office complex across both Xenia Avenue South and Turners Crossroad. Planning Commissioners made the following comments on the text of the draft agreement: 1. Section 3.12 of the draft development agreement guaranteeing the developer that the HRA will not subsidize another similar type project in the Golden Hills Area for a specified length of time could be clarified by stipulating that the HRA will not subsidize any office project other than-the one covered by the development agreement. 2. The definition of "Unavoidable Delays" in Section 1.1 includes administrative orders which could be interpreted to mean orders of a City building official resulting from deficiencies due to failure of the developer to perform .according to code and regulation. The concern is that deadline extensions not be granted for delays caused by actions or omissions on the part of the developer. 16~ It was suggested that the draft development agreement be placed on the agenda of the next Planning Commission meeting scheduled for October 14, 1985 in order to afford other Planning Commissioners the opportunity to comment. Staff informed Commissioners that the developer is currently. in the process of preparing a revised site plan for inclusion in the final development agreement and that the revised plan should be available for the next Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner McAleese requested that scheduling of information and study sessions also be included on the agenda for discussion at the next Planning Commission meeting.. The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret Leppik, Vice Chairman